WEBVTT - The World Is Getting Better w/ Marian Tupy #1067

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:03.200
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to had to Money. I'm Joel, and today I'm

0:00:03.279 --> 0:00:06.000
<v Speaker 1>talking about how the world is getting better with Mary

0:00:06.000 --> 0:00:27.600
<v Speaker 1>and Tupy. Okay, so you've heard the phrase this is

0:00:27.600 --> 0:00:30.480
<v Speaker 1>why we can't have nice things. Our modern society has

0:00:30.520 --> 0:00:33.440
<v Speaker 1>produced a slew of nice things, though that would have

0:00:33.479 --> 0:00:35.559
<v Speaker 1>been hard to fathom fifty years ago, much less two

0:00:35.680 --> 0:00:39.320
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifty years ago. PCs and smartphones, gore tex

0:00:39.440 --> 0:00:43.320
<v Speaker 1>and duct tape, GPS and the barcode. All of these things,

0:00:43.360 --> 0:00:45.920
<v Speaker 1>to greater or lesser degrees, have made our lives better.

0:00:46.320 --> 0:00:49.479
<v Speaker 1>But how did those innovations and that abundance come about.

0:00:50.080 --> 0:00:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Why do twenty twenty five look so radically different in

0:00:53.000 --> 0:00:56.480
<v Speaker 1>the developed world than eighteen twenty five. Well, Mary and

0:00:56.520 --> 0:00:59.400
<v Speaker 1>Tupey's book Superabundance was a revelation to me a few

0:00:59.440 --> 0:01:03.120
<v Speaker 1>years ago, showing how far we've come in pretty easy

0:01:03.120 --> 0:01:06.440
<v Speaker 1>to understand language. Maryon Twopy is a senior fellow at

0:01:06.480 --> 0:01:09.319
<v Speaker 1>the Cato Institute. He's also the founder and editor of

0:01:09.400 --> 0:01:12.319
<v Speaker 1>human Progress dot org, a site that seeks to evidence

0:01:12.360 --> 0:01:15.880
<v Speaker 1>these dramatic improvements. With Thanksgiving coming up tomorrow, I couldn't

0:01:15.880 --> 0:01:17.800
<v Speaker 1>think of a better time to cover this topic. So

0:01:18.200 --> 0:01:19.840
<v Speaker 1>Mary and Twopy. Thank you so much for joining me

0:01:19.880 --> 0:01:20.760
<v Speaker 1>today on the podcast.

0:01:21.040 --> 0:01:21.880
<v Speaker 2>Thank you for having me.

0:01:22.200 --> 0:01:25.480
<v Speaker 1>Okay, first question we ask everybody who comes on. I

0:01:25.520 --> 0:01:28.000
<v Speaker 1>like to splorage on craft beer, fancy craft beer. Honestly,

0:01:28.000 --> 0:01:30.760
<v Speaker 1>with Thanksgiving I might pops off really nice tomorrow. What

0:01:31.880 --> 0:01:32.840
<v Speaker 1>is that for you, though? What do you like to

0:01:32.840 --> 0:01:35.280
<v Speaker 1>splurge on while you're still being smart and thoughtful about

0:01:35.280 --> 0:01:36.679
<v Speaker 1>your finances in your future.

0:01:37.760 --> 0:01:40.080
<v Speaker 2>I save a lot of money to be able to travel.

0:01:40.200 --> 0:01:44.360
<v Speaker 2>I really enjoy traveling and exploring different parts of the world,

0:01:44.400 --> 0:01:46.400
<v Speaker 2>so I would say that is my luxury, although I

0:01:46.440 --> 0:01:47.640
<v Speaker 2>do like beer as well.

0:01:47.840 --> 0:01:51.160
<v Speaker 1>Okay, all right, then we can be friends. Then what's

0:01:51.200 --> 0:01:52.800
<v Speaker 1>the last great trip you went on?

0:01:53.000 --> 0:01:55.920
<v Speaker 2>I must say I think my last great trip was

0:01:55.920 --> 0:02:02.120
<v Speaker 2>to Argentina. I think that a discovery of Buenos Aires.

0:02:03.000 --> 0:02:07.160
<v Speaker 2>It is a proper Western, well functioning, beautiful, laid out

0:02:07.160 --> 0:02:09.959
<v Speaker 2>city in Latin America that you wouldn't expect to find,

0:02:10.320 --> 0:02:12.520
<v Speaker 2>and I enjoyed being there very much.

0:02:12.600 --> 0:02:15.639
<v Speaker 1>Okay, all right, after I went a long long time ago.

0:02:15.639 --> 0:02:17.320
<v Speaker 1>It was probably thirty years ago, so I'll have to

0:02:17.360 --> 0:02:18.600
<v Speaker 1>like put it back on my list. I have to

0:02:18.639 --> 0:02:21.440
<v Speaker 1>go as an adult. Let's get to the topic. I'm curious, like,

0:02:22.720 --> 0:02:26.240
<v Speaker 1>have we as a society become too accustomed to our

0:02:26.320 --> 0:02:30.400
<v Speaker 1>current level of wealth without understanding how it's come to be.

0:02:30.639 --> 0:02:33.440
<v Speaker 1>It seems like there's like a disconnect right now, and

0:02:34.800 --> 0:02:37.400
<v Speaker 1>there's like a burn it down sort of mentality without

0:02:37.440 --> 0:02:39.560
<v Speaker 1>really understanding what we're attempting to burn down.

0:02:39.880 --> 0:02:43.440
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I think that is a very good perspective to have.

0:02:44.600 --> 0:02:48.000
<v Speaker 2>We have gotten to where we are by being a

0:02:48.400 --> 0:02:53.480
<v Speaker 2>much more open society to new innovations. New innovations don't

0:02:53.520 --> 0:02:57.680
<v Speaker 2>just have to be technological, medical, scientific innovations. They can

0:02:57.720 --> 0:03:04.320
<v Speaker 2>be also ethical, cultural innovations. And basically, for a variety

0:03:04.639 --> 0:03:09.400
<v Speaker 2>of reasons, Europe in the eighteenth century became much more

0:03:09.440 --> 0:03:14.200
<v Speaker 2>open to new ideas. New ideas flourished, and they brought

0:03:14.240 --> 0:03:19.639
<v Speaker 2>about what the Austrian economist Joseph Schumpeter called creative destruction.

0:03:20.840 --> 0:03:27.160
<v Speaker 2>A lot of old presumptions, dogma's ideas were simply swept away,

0:03:27.840 --> 0:03:32.120
<v Speaker 2>and the society well became much more open to innovation.

0:03:32.280 --> 0:03:36.080
<v Speaker 2>And as a consequence of that, we have unleashed for

0:03:36.120 --> 0:03:39.400
<v Speaker 2>the last two hundred years an era of unprecedented innovation

0:03:39.480 --> 0:03:43.640
<v Speaker 2>and consequently greater economic growth as well as I would

0:03:43.640 --> 0:03:47.760
<v Speaker 2>say improved morality where people treat each other much better

0:03:47.760 --> 0:03:52.320
<v Speaker 2>than they used to. And I think that in certain

0:03:52.360 --> 0:03:58.440
<v Speaker 2>ways we have certainly forgotten about that. The society is

0:03:58.480 --> 0:04:01.880
<v Speaker 2>becoming much more close. You can see it in terms

0:04:01.960 --> 0:04:04.680
<v Speaker 2>of how we treat international trade, which is of course

0:04:04.760 --> 0:04:10.440
<v Speaker 2>very important to to to innovation and to economic growth,

0:04:10.960 --> 0:04:15.120
<v Speaker 2>but also society is becoming much more skeptical about certain

0:04:15.200 --> 0:04:19.000
<v Speaker 2>kinds of innovation. Tacker Carlson, for example, was interviewed by

0:04:19.200 --> 0:04:23.240
<v Speaker 2>Ben Shapiro about two years ago, and Ben Shapiro asked

0:04:23.320 --> 0:04:29.080
<v Speaker 2>him what would he do about autonomous truck trucking autonomous

0:04:29.520 --> 0:04:32.840
<v Speaker 2>you know, trucks, and Tucker said that he would ban

0:04:32.920 --> 0:04:35.440
<v Speaker 2>it in a second because it would put a lot

0:04:35.440 --> 0:04:39.680
<v Speaker 2>of truckers out of work. But if you made the

0:04:39.760 --> 0:04:43.239
<v Speaker 2>same argument two hundred years ago, or even one hundred

0:04:43.279 --> 0:04:47.240
<v Speaker 2>years ago about horse buggy drivers, sure, then we would

0:04:47.240 --> 0:04:52.240
<v Speaker 2>still be, you know, riding horse buggies rather than driving trucks.

0:04:52.720 --> 0:04:54.440
<v Speaker 1>At the bank, right, I mean, there's a million things

0:04:54.440 --> 0:04:54.960
<v Speaker 1>you could point to.

0:04:55.080 --> 0:04:57.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So that's that's a very long answer to your

0:04:57.040 --> 0:04:58.520
<v Speaker 2>short question, but it was a good one.

0:04:59.000 --> 0:05:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that the twenty four hour news cycle

0:05:01.040 --> 0:05:04.000
<v Speaker 1>is part of the problem that it impacts our ability

0:05:04.040 --> 0:05:05.560
<v Speaker 1>to see the good things that are happening in the world.

0:05:05.640 --> 0:05:07.360
<v Speaker 1>I know that these websites for a minute, that we're

0:05:07.360 --> 0:05:10.359
<v Speaker 1>dedicated to only publishing good news, but it does feel

0:05:10.400 --> 0:05:13.599
<v Speaker 1>like the twenty four hour news cycle before it existed,

0:05:13.760 --> 0:05:16.120
<v Speaker 1>we were just less aware of maybe some of the

0:05:16.200 --> 0:05:20.480
<v Speaker 1>negative things happening in our society, and maybe ignorance was bliss,

0:05:20.480 --> 0:05:21.520
<v Speaker 1>at least to a certain extent.

0:05:23.560 --> 0:05:26.039
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure if ignorance is ever bliss, but maybe.

0:05:26.080 --> 0:05:29.120
<v Speaker 2>All right, I will tell you I agree with you

0:05:30.320 --> 0:05:32.919
<v Speaker 2>broadly speaking, but I think that there is something else

0:05:33.000 --> 0:05:39.320
<v Speaker 2>going on, which is a negativity contagion. So it's not

0:05:39.400 --> 0:05:42.159
<v Speaker 2>so much that we have twenty four hour cycle, though

0:05:42.279 --> 0:05:46.159
<v Speaker 2>that's part of it. It's that there's just so many

0:05:46.240 --> 0:05:50.559
<v Speaker 2>more outlets and they're all doing the same things, which

0:05:50.600 --> 0:05:55.520
<v Speaker 2>is presenting negative news. So it's not just that Fox

0:05:55.640 --> 0:06:00.240
<v Speaker 2>has to compete against NBC and CBS and ABC. You

0:06:00.400 --> 0:06:05.599
<v Speaker 2>now have websites where most people get their news, in

0:06:05.640 --> 0:06:10.440
<v Speaker 2>addition to radio and newspapers and so forth, and we

0:06:10.480 --> 0:06:13.960
<v Speaker 2>have evolved to prioritize bad news. And so because you

0:06:14.040 --> 0:06:18.640
<v Speaker 2>have now this hyper competitive environment, the only way that

0:06:18.680 --> 0:06:21.560
<v Speaker 2>you can get people to come back to you. In

0:06:21.600 --> 0:06:25.000
<v Speaker 2>the phase of all of that competition is to present

0:06:25.640 --> 0:06:30.040
<v Speaker 2>the worst news first and repeatedly and in the worst

0:06:30.080 --> 0:06:33.880
<v Speaker 2>possible terms, and there is very little time and space

0:06:34.120 --> 0:06:39.400
<v Speaker 2>for positive news. The hundreds of little innovations that are

0:06:39.400 --> 0:06:43.000
<v Speaker 2>happening every day that are improving people's lives simply do

0:06:43.080 --> 0:06:46.960
<v Speaker 2>not make it on those websites or on those newscasts

0:06:47.080 --> 0:06:51.560
<v Speaker 2>because in order to get those eyeballs, they have to

0:06:51.720 --> 0:06:55.200
<v Speaker 2>focus on the negatives. So the perception that is created

0:06:55.240 --> 0:06:59.480
<v Speaker 2>in the human mind is that everything in the world

0:06:59.560 --> 0:07:04.920
<v Speaker 2>is getting worse, and that is certainly incorrect, it's unrealistic,

0:07:05.120 --> 0:07:08.880
<v Speaker 2>and it is highly damaging. So it's the negative emotional

0:07:08.880 --> 0:07:13.640
<v Speaker 2>contagent which we have to deal with, and there is

0:07:13.640 --> 0:07:15.800
<v Speaker 2>not an easy solution to it, because it's not like

0:07:15.920 --> 0:07:18.600
<v Speaker 2>it's a market failure in a sense of hyper competition

0:07:18.920 --> 0:07:22.480
<v Speaker 2>of of of media only there there is there is

0:07:22.520 --> 0:07:25.440
<v Speaker 2>a there is a human nature at play. We desire

0:07:25.560 --> 0:07:28.640
<v Speaker 2>bad news that because we have evolved to look out

0:07:28.680 --> 0:07:30.080
<v Speaker 2>for bad news in order to survive.

0:07:30.840 --> 0:07:33.680
<v Speaker 1>You you run a site that focuses on a lot

0:07:33.680 --> 0:07:36.000
<v Speaker 1>of good news that highlights the progress that we've made,

0:07:36.400 --> 0:07:39.679
<v Speaker 1>so which is kind of the opposite of what drives

0:07:39.720 --> 0:07:42.720
<v Speaker 1>in the media ecosystem right now, can you share maybe

0:07:42.800 --> 0:07:46.480
<v Speaker 1>a few things, a few recent things from your site

0:07:46.480 --> 0:07:48.040
<v Speaker 1>that you guys have been working on.

0:07:48.480 --> 0:07:52.600
<v Speaker 2>Sure, so, Human progress dot org is specifically intended to

0:07:52.720 --> 0:07:58.280
<v Speaker 2>combat this negativity, emotional bias, or contagion, and people can

0:07:58.480 --> 0:08:01.640
<v Speaker 2>sign up for a week summary of all the good

0:08:01.680 --> 0:08:04.320
<v Speaker 2>things that have taken place. You know, it's just one

0:08:04.360 --> 0:08:06.440
<v Speaker 2>email a week saying hey, you know, this is what

0:08:06.480 --> 0:08:10.280
<v Speaker 2>has happened in the last few weeks. We have seen

0:08:10.880 --> 0:08:15.760
<v Speaker 2>children who were genetically unable to hear regain their hearing.

0:08:16.680 --> 0:08:21.440
<v Speaker 2>We have seen new advances. We have seen new statistics

0:08:21.760 --> 0:08:27.400
<v Speaker 2>showing how certain threatened species of whale are actually expanding

0:08:27.480 --> 0:08:30.240
<v Speaker 2>all over the world. We have seen the discovery of

0:08:30.280 --> 0:08:35.240
<v Speaker 2>a new antibiotic which will which will enable us to

0:08:35.320 --> 0:08:37.679
<v Speaker 2>get around the problem of superbugs, and so on and

0:08:37.720 --> 0:08:41.200
<v Speaker 2>so forth. So again, the good news is out there

0:08:41.200 --> 0:08:43.680
<v Speaker 2>if you just look for it. But I'm afraid that

0:08:43.920 --> 0:08:47.000
<v Speaker 2>you know, our reach is you know, hundreds of thousands

0:08:47.040 --> 0:08:52.040
<v Speaker 2>of people. It is not millions that the doom and

0:08:52.080 --> 0:08:54.240
<v Speaker 2>gloom newscasts get every day.

0:08:54.520 --> 0:08:58.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, okay, let's just talk about progress. Is all progress

0:08:58.320 --> 0:09:01.199
<v Speaker 1>good because it does seem like most of the time,

0:09:01.280 --> 0:09:03.000
<v Speaker 1>much of the time, specially over the past couple hundreds,

0:09:03.040 --> 0:09:05.559
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the progress that we've experienced has been

0:09:05.600 --> 0:09:09.880
<v Speaker 1>to our benefit personally economically. Automation though it can bring

0:09:09.920 --> 0:09:12.320
<v Speaker 1>down prices, but it can also reduce jobs, as we

0:09:12.320 --> 0:09:15.720
<v Speaker 1>were kind of referring to. So how do you square

0:09:15.720 --> 0:09:19.559
<v Speaker 1>that circle on progress, good, bad? Somewhere in the middle.

0:09:20.120 --> 0:09:22.880
<v Speaker 2>I would say that my definition of progress obviously has

0:09:23.160 --> 0:09:26.080
<v Speaker 2>the human in front of it, so you know, it

0:09:26.200 --> 0:09:31.160
<v Speaker 2>is a very humanistic or human centric or entropercentric project,

0:09:31.240 --> 0:09:34.280
<v Speaker 2>if you will. And if there are aspects to progress

0:09:34.760 --> 0:09:39.160
<v Speaker 2>which are damaging to humanity, that then we need to

0:09:39.480 --> 0:09:44.160
<v Speaker 2>we need to we need to talk about it. For example,

0:09:45.800 --> 0:09:49.719
<v Speaker 2>it is an open question whether the fact that we

0:09:49.760 --> 0:09:53.360
<v Speaker 2>have much more free time than people in the past.

0:09:54.280 --> 0:09:56.760
<v Speaker 2>It's just the reality is that as people earn more

0:09:56.800 --> 0:10:00.760
<v Speaker 2>money than number of hours of work is lower or

0:10:01.200 --> 0:10:04.560
<v Speaker 2>goes down, believe it or not. Even though Americans, for example,

0:10:04.640 --> 0:10:07.440
<v Speaker 2>work much more than people in Western Europe, we still

0:10:07.679 --> 0:10:10.080
<v Speaker 2>work about a third less than what we did two

0:10:10.120 --> 0:10:13.040
<v Speaker 2>hundred years ago. Right, So we have all this time

0:10:13.080 --> 0:10:16.600
<v Speaker 2>on our hands, and you know that provides much more

0:10:16.600 --> 0:10:20.600
<v Speaker 2>time for introspection and especially if you are amongst the

0:10:20.720 --> 0:10:24.880
<v Speaker 2>least fortunate people in the United States, say somebody who

0:10:24.880 --> 0:10:27.520
<v Speaker 2>doesn't have a family, maybe you have just lost your job,

0:10:27.559 --> 0:10:31.199
<v Speaker 2>et cetera. Having a lot of time for rumination may

0:10:31.240 --> 0:10:34.520
<v Speaker 2>not be a bad idea, especially if you have access

0:10:34.559 --> 0:10:38.679
<v Speaker 2>to all the bad news. So there's another aspect of it,

0:10:39.240 --> 0:10:43.320
<v Speaker 2>which is social media. I am not putting down social

0:10:43.360 --> 0:10:47.960
<v Speaker 2>media because I think the jury is still out, you know,

0:10:48.040 --> 0:10:50.280
<v Speaker 2>social media, and it enables us to do a lot

0:10:50.280 --> 0:10:54.320
<v Speaker 2>of marvelous things, keeping up with cousins across the you know,

0:10:54.360 --> 0:10:58.040
<v Speaker 2>across the world, speaking to our parents who may not

0:10:58.160 --> 0:11:01.120
<v Speaker 2>live in the United States but in your or elsewhere.

0:11:01.520 --> 0:11:05.920
<v Speaker 2>It allows us to get alerts for tsunamis and things

0:11:06.040 --> 0:11:08.000
<v Speaker 2>like that. So there's a lot of positive to it.

0:11:08.920 --> 0:11:12.280
<v Speaker 2>But maybe, as Jonathan Hyde argues, taking them out of

0:11:12.360 --> 0:11:15.360
<v Speaker 2>high schools is not a bad idea. So we have

0:11:15.559 --> 0:11:19.840
<v Speaker 2>just hired a human progress a young psychologist from Harvard

0:11:20.240 --> 0:11:25.000
<v Speaker 2>who will be researching these issues and hopefully make us

0:11:25.080 --> 0:11:29.640
<v Speaker 2>understand better about the negative aspects of progress.

0:11:30.080 --> 0:11:34.640
<v Speaker 1>Can you talk about what has propelled human economic activity

0:11:34.800 --> 0:11:37.080
<v Speaker 1>to accelerate in such an epic way, especially over the

0:11:37.080 --> 0:11:40.000
<v Speaker 1>past one hundred and fifty years and maybe why it's

0:11:40.040 --> 0:11:44.319
<v Speaker 1>been experienced more in a more heightened way in countries

0:11:44.720 --> 0:11:47.840
<v Speaker 1>like ours then maybe and even a stark difference of

0:11:47.840 --> 0:11:50.880
<v Speaker 1>like North Korea and South Korea, right, like one thriving

0:11:51.200 --> 0:11:54.480
<v Speaker 1>economic hub and one closed off from the world. Is

0:11:54.480 --> 0:11:56.640
<v Speaker 1>it kind of pointing back to what you mentioned earlier,

0:11:56.720 --> 0:12:00.560
<v Speaker 1>being closed off from trade and therefore being closed off

0:12:00.559 --> 0:12:01.080
<v Speaker 1>from innovation.

0:12:01.640 --> 0:12:04.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think that you're basically a right when you

0:12:04.760 --> 0:12:10.000
<v Speaker 2>have two states made up of essentially the same people,

0:12:10.520 --> 0:12:14.679
<v Speaker 2>like East Germany and West Germany and North and South Korea,

0:12:14.960 --> 0:12:20.439
<v Speaker 2>and they are producing fundamentally different economic results, that suggests

0:12:21.080 --> 0:12:26.360
<v Speaker 2>being more open to international trade, have enforceable private property

0:12:26.440 --> 0:12:30.040
<v Speaker 2>rights to give just two examples, maybe a stable currency

0:12:30.559 --> 0:12:34.280
<v Speaker 2>are very important. So Economic Freedom of the World Report,

0:12:34.320 --> 0:12:36.880
<v Speaker 2>which is co published by the Cato Institute and Fraser

0:12:37.960 --> 0:12:42.719
<v Speaker 2>Frasier Institute in Canada, they look at regulatory structure, they

0:12:42.760 --> 0:12:47.680
<v Speaker 2>look at trade openers, they look at they look at

0:12:48.080 --> 0:12:54.080
<v Speaker 2>sound currency trade and basically what they find is that

0:12:54.360 --> 0:12:57.120
<v Speaker 2>the more open you are, the less regulated you are,

0:12:57.160 --> 0:13:01.640
<v Speaker 2>the less overtaxed you are, the better you And what

0:13:01.760 --> 0:13:06.920
<v Speaker 2>has happened was that for a variety of contingent historical reasons.

0:13:07.679 --> 0:13:11.320
<v Speaker 2>Many of these things came together in Northwestern Europe, especially

0:13:11.360 --> 0:13:16.120
<v Speaker 2>in Holland or Netherlands and the United Kingdom in the

0:13:16.120 --> 0:13:21.559
<v Speaker 2>seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, and they were able to grow

0:13:21.679 --> 0:13:24.640
<v Speaker 2>rapidly and show the path to the rest of the world.

0:13:24.800 --> 0:13:28.520
<v Speaker 2>And since the United States is simply a daughter country

0:13:28.960 --> 0:13:34.040
<v Speaker 2>of Great Britain, many of those institutions and very importantly

0:13:34.080 --> 0:13:38.040
<v Speaker 2>cultural values that Britain had had been translated into the

0:13:38.120 --> 0:13:43.480
<v Speaker 2>American context, and America could build upon the British the

0:13:43.520 --> 0:13:47.360
<v Speaker 2>British origin story to become the wealthiest country in the

0:13:47.400 --> 0:13:51.880
<v Speaker 2>world by the year nineteen hundred. So fundamentally it's about institutions,

0:13:51.960 --> 0:13:54.959
<v Speaker 2>but I think that cultural reasons play also a part.

0:13:55.520 --> 0:14:00.400
<v Speaker 2>And it is a highly contentious territory, I would say,

0:14:00.440 --> 0:14:03.720
<v Speaker 2>but I think those two are very important. Yeah.

0:14:03.760 --> 0:14:05.480
<v Speaker 1>I heard you say at one point that the good

0:14:05.480 --> 0:14:08.400
<v Speaker 1>old days were buying large very bad, and I loved

0:14:08.640 --> 0:14:10.439
<v Speaker 1>I love that because so many people like look back

0:14:10.480 --> 0:14:13.400
<v Speaker 1>with nostalgia to a bygone era and they're like, I

0:14:13.480 --> 0:14:17.800
<v Speaker 1>was so great back then. But I don't think if

0:14:17.840 --> 0:14:20.440
<v Speaker 1>most of us were offered a time machine, we'd go back,

0:14:20.720 --> 0:14:24.520
<v Speaker 1>probably even fifteen or twenty years when you ask a youngster, hey,

0:14:24.560 --> 0:14:27.280
<v Speaker 1>would you give up your smartphone for a million dollars? Like,

0:14:27.320 --> 0:14:29.280
<v Speaker 1>they wouldn't do it, you know, they just wouldn't. They

0:14:29.280 --> 0:14:31.720
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't want to be parted from that progress. So how

0:14:31.760 --> 0:14:33.960
<v Speaker 1>do you How bad was life back in the day?

0:14:34.640 --> 0:14:36.760
<v Speaker 1>How great is it? How great do we have it now?

0:14:37.120 --> 0:14:39.200
<v Speaker 2>First of all, I wish we did have time travel,

0:14:39.240 --> 0:14:42.160
<v Speaker 2>because I think that I would love to send every

0:14:43.520 --> 0:14:47.840
<v Speaker 2>college kid or school kid to Pompeii, where I was

0:14:48.960 --> 0:14:51.160
<v Speaker 2>what three or four weeks ago. This is the city

0:14:51.920 --> 0:14:56.440
<v Speaker 2>that was destroyed by volcanic corruptions in seventy nine AD

0:14:57.320 --> 0:15:01.240
<v Speaker 2>and can be visited in a close on Naples today.

0:15:01.760 --> 0:15:05.440
<v Speaker 2>And the fascinating thing that you see in Pompeii is

0:15:05.720 --> 0:15:11.600
<v Speaker 2>that the tile roads have large stones running through them.

0:15:11.640 --> 0:15:14.760
<v Speaker 2>Instead of pedestrian walks, they have these large stepping stones.

0:15:15.760 --> 0:15:18.960
<v Speaker 2>Why do they have them, Well, they have them because

0:15:19.520 --> 0:15:27.040
<v Speaker 2>streets would basically be running with sewer. All the human excrement, urine, awfal,

0:15:28.480 --> 0:15:32.160
<v Speaker 2>blood from slaughtered animals would be simply dumped into the street,

0:15:32.440 --> 0:15:35.640
<v Speaker 2>and then you would have water running down those streets

0:15:35.680 --> 0:15:38.480
<v Speaker 2>in order to flush it into the sea, which is

0:15:38.720 --> 0:15:42.920
<v Speaker 2>partly why Pompeii is on a hill, you know, going

0:15:42.960 --> 0:15:48.160
<v Speaker 2>down to the Mediterranean Sea, and people used to cross

0:15:48.920 --> 0:15:53.480
<v Speaker 2>streets on stilts and things like that because basically, basically

0:15:54.880 --> 0:15:57.320
<v Speaker 2>it was incredibly filthy. That's the first thing that you

0:15:57.360 --> 0:16:00.720
<v Speaker 2>would that you would discover if you went acting time,

0:16:01.560 --> 0:16:05.400
<v Speaker 2>the fils and the stench everywhere. The other thing that

0:16:05.440 --> 0:16:10.720
<v Speaker 2>you would quickly realize is that people lived to about

0:16:10.880 --> 0:16:15.000
<v Speaker 2>thirty Today, life expectancy around the world is about seventy three.

0:16:15.000 --> 0:16:17.320
<v Speaker 2>It's about seventy nine in the United States, so everybody

0:16:17.360 --> 0:16:21.880
<v Speaker 2>has been granted an extra life. Fifty percent of children

0:16:22.560 --> 0:16:30.080
<v Speaker 2>before the age of fifteen died. Okay, murderate in Renaissance

0:16:30.120 --> 0:16:34.080
<v Speaker 2>Italy was about forty per hundred thousand. Today in Italy

0:16:34.160 --> 0:16:38.320
<v Speaker 2>it's zero point three per one hundred thousand. So when

0:16:38.320 --> 0:16:42.560
<v Speaker 2>it comes to violence, life expectancy, child maternal mortality, roughly

0:16:43.120 --> 0:16:48.560
<v Speaker 2>one thousand women per one hundred thousand childbirths would die.

0:16:48.960 --> 0:16:50.800
<v Speaker 2>In the old days to day, it's a fraction of that.

0:16:51.680 --> 0:16:58.280
<v Speaker 2>People were ignorant and illiterate. Our best evidence suggests that

0:16:58.400 --> 0:17:01.320
<v Speaker 2>even the most sophisticated society is roughly ten percent of

0:17:01.360 --> 0:17:05.440
<v Speaker 2>people could read and write. Today it's obviously almost universal,

0:17:06.400 --> 0:17:10.160
<v Speaker 2>so along so many dimensions, life was just so much

0:17:10.200 --> 0:17:12.800
<v Speaker 2>more difficult. And don't forget that we were incredibly poor.

0:17:13.560 --> 0:17:17.399
<v Speaker 2>So GDP per capita per person per day was about

0:17:17.480 --> 0:17:21.639
<v Speaker 2>two to three dollars. Right today globally it's about forty

0:17:21.680 --> 0:17:24.240
<v Speaker 2>dollars adjusted for inflation. So that gives you a sense

0:17:25.000 --> 0:17:26.800
<v Speaker 2>of where we were and where we are today. The

0:17:26.880 --> 0:17:29.800
<v Speaker 2>last two hundred years are really unprecedented in human history

0:17:30.320 --> 0:17:35.639
<v Speaker 2>in terms of the extraordinary flourishing of humanity. And I

0:17:35.680 --> 0:17:40.800
<v Speaker 2>think that it is deeply connected to the increased liberalization,

0:17:42.560 --> 0:17:45.320
<v Speaker 2>not using it in political terms, you know, as in

0:17:45.440 --> 0:17:50.520
<v Speaker 2>liberal in the United States, liberalization of economy and politics.

0:17:50.840 --> 0:17:55.760
<v Speaker 2>Governments became much more responsive, They started enforcing they stopped

0:17:55.800 --> 0:17:59.640
<v Speaker 2>behaving in arbitrary fashion, they started enforcing equality before the law.

0:18:00.280 --> 0:18:03.640
<v Speaker 2>And of course in the economy, we just became much freer.

0:18:04.119 --> 0:18:07.520
<v Speaker 2>In fifteen or sixteenth century England, for example, whether you

0:18:07.560 --> 0:18:10.679
<v Speaker 2>wanted to import something or export something, you need the

0:18:10.680 --> 0:18:12.680
<v Speaker 2>permission of the king, who would give you a monopoly

0:18:12.760 --> 0:18:15.240
<v Speaker 2>on the export of salt or the import of wool

0:18:15.320 --> 0:18:18.399
<v Speaker 2>and whatever else. Today you can pretty much start a

0:18:18.440 --> 0:18:22.200
<v Speaker 2>business anytime you like. You just have to deal with regulations.

0:18:22.280 --> 0:18:26.879
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, is progress something you think of as unavoidable or

0:18:26.920 --> 0:18:29.360
<v Speaker 1>do you think it's something that needs to be safeguarded?

0:18:29.640 --> 0:18:32.919
<v Speaker 1>Like I think about not being able to recreate the

0:18:32.920 --> 0:18:36.719
<v Speaker 1>pyramids right, like almost like that ability has been lost

0:18:37.240 --> 0:18:40.200
<v Speaker 1>and we don't know how right the pyramids were made,

0:18:40.880 --> 0:18:43.080
<v Speaker 1>or rockets. I've heard Elon Must say something along the

0:18:43.080 --> 0:18:46.960
<v Speaker 1>lines of like, if we hadn't started to make rockets again,

0:18:47.560 --> 0:18:49.600
<v Speaker 1>some of that knowledge would would have been lost. What

0:18:49.760 --> 0:18:52.040
<v Speaker 1>would have gone away? Is that how progress is? Can

0:18:52.080 --> 0:18:52.600
<v Speaker 1>it be lost?

0:18:52.880 --> 0:18:55.080
<v Speaker 2>Well? I don't know about the pyramids. I'm pretty sure

0:18:55.080 --> 0:18:57.239
<v Speaker 2>that we could make them with heavy machinery today. I

0:18:57.280 --> 0:19:00.240
<v Speaker 2>think that the question about the pyramids is how did

0:19:00.280 --> 0:19:03.240
<v Speaker 2>the ancients create them without heavy machinery? But we could

0:19:03.320 --> 0:19:07.560
<v Speaker 2>probably do that. No, progress is definitely not guaranteed. When

0:19:07.760 --> 0:19:10.600
<v Speaker 2>people started realizing that the world was improving at a

0:19:10.720 --> 0:19:13.000
<v Speaker 2>very fast click in the nineteenth century, there was an

0:19:13.040 --> 0:19:17.959
<v Speaker 2>emergence of a number of schools of thought. Hegel marks,

0:19:18.160 --> 0:19:21.560
<v Speaker 2>can't people like that who started talking about progress as

0:19:21.560 --> 0:19:26.840
<v Speaker 2>being unavoidable. But that is clearly not true. Progress can regress.

0:19:27.320 --> 0:19:30.240
<v Speaker 2>After the fall of the Roman Empire, for example, Europe

0:19:30.320 --> 0:19:34.200
<v Speaker 2>forgot a lot of the knowledge that the Romans possessed.

0:19:34.280 --> 0:19:36.840
<v Speaker 2>To this day, we don't know how to make Roman concrete,

0:19:36.840 --> 0:19:40.439
<v Speaker 2>for example, even though it has withstood for two thousand

0:19:40.520 --> 0:19:47.720
<v Speaker 2>years and so and people in the dark ages in Europe,

0:19:47.760 --> 0:19:50.439
<v Speaker 2>you know, used to walk amongst the monuments built by

0:19:50.440 --> 0:19:53.920
<v Speaker 2>the Romans, wondering who were these people who created all

0:19:53.960 --> 0:19:56.679
<v Speaker 2>of this? Because they forgot right. So so knowledge can

0:19:56.720 --> 0:20:00.520
<v Speaker 2>be lost, Progress can regress. There is nothing unavoid about it.

0:20:00.560 --> 0:20:04.679
<v Speaker 2>And that's what concerns me is that, as you noted

0:20:04.720 --> 0:20:07.720
<v Speaker 2>at the beginning of the interview, so many people have

0:20:07.760 --> 0:20:13.240
<v Speaker 2>forgotten the reasons why progress has happened. It happens because

0:20:13.800 --> 0:20:18.359
<v Speaker 2>of an open economy tolerant of new ideas. And when

0:20:18.359 --> 0:20:22.120
<v Speaker 2>that goes, or when our institutions change, and you know,

0:20:22.160 --> 0:20:26.400
<v Speaker 2>when we embrace socialism, for example, like the North Koreans

0:20:27.040 --> 0:20:30.240
<v Speaker 2>or the Cubans or the Venezuelans, then I'm afraid progress

0:20:30.240 --> 0:20:32.000
<v Speaker 2>will stall and eventually go into reverse.

0:20:32.400 --> 0:20:35.760
<v Speaker 1>One retort that you might hear from people who think

0:20:35.760 --> 0:20:40.040
<v Speaker 1>of progress as not like an evident, self evidently good thing, is,

0:20:40.080 --> 0:20:44.480
<v Speaker 1>in particular, like some of the environmental ramifications that progress

0:20:45.160 --> 0:20:49.520
<v Speaker 1>the negative harms to our environment, that progress can create

0:20:50.119 --> 0:20:51.080
<v Speaker 1>what would you say to that.

0:20:51.440 --> 0:20:56.119
<v Speaker 2>I would say yes and no. So what tends to

0:20:56.160 --> 0:20:59.439
<v Speaker 2>happen when countries start industrializing, So you go through this

0:20:59.520 --> 0:21:02.800
<v Speaker 2>process of moving from agriculture to industry to services, and

0:21:02.840 --> 0:21:07.200
<v Speaker 2>when countries undertake industrialization, there is a lot of ecological

0:21:07.280 --> 0:21:10.760
<v Speaker 2>harm that takes place. That being said, it's not like

0:21:11.000 --> 0:21:17.360
<v Speaker 2>life in the agricultural society was without its risks. For example,

0:21:17.440 --> 0:21:20.720
<v Speaker 2>food would be contaminated at all times, people were suffering

0:21:20.760 --> 0:21:24.960
<v Speaker 2>from tremendous gustro intestinal problems, riven with parasites and so forth.

0:21:24.960 --> 0:21:27.119
<v Speaker 2>But never mind, let's put that aside. The point is

0:21:27.119 --> 0:21:29.920
<v Speaker 2>that once you move from agriculture to industry, you do

0:21:30.000 --> 0:21:33.080
<v Speaker 2>tend to create a lot of environmental damage. But then

0:21:33.119 --> 0:21:37.320
<v Speaker 2>what happens is that what is called an environmental Kuznetz

0:21:37.400 --> 0:21:40.920
<v Speaker 2>curve kicks in. And this is just a fancy way

0:21:41.040 --> 0:21:43.439
<v Speaker 2>of saying, is that when people become rich enough, they

0:21:43.520 --> 0:21:47.719
<v Speaker 2>start caring about the environment, and they have enough wealth

0:21:48.119 --> 0:21:51.600
<v Speaker 2>to start protecting their environment. So there are a number

0:21:51.600 --> 0:21:53.479
<v Speaker 2>of things that go on. One of them is that

0:21:53.600 --> 0:21:56.359
<v Speaker 2>you simply have more money and more resources human and

0:21:56.440 --> 0:21:59.720
<v Speaker 2>otherwise to clean up your reverse, which is why today

0:22:00.480 --> 0:22:04.600
<v Speaker 2>people are swimming in the Seine, and there are dolphins

0:22:04.640 --> 0:22:07.840
<v Speaker 2>in Thames in London that didn't used to be the

0:22:07.880 --> 0:22:12.560
<v Speaker 2>case during industrialization, so nature naturally rebounds. Another thing that

0:22:12.640 --> 0:22:17.720
<v Speaker 2>happens is urbanization. Basically the most disruptive element on land

0:22:18.280 --> 0:22:22.639
<v Speaker 2>is the human being. And when you take humans of

0:22:22.760 --> 0:22:26.520
<v Speaker 2>the land, in other words, as you move from agriculture

0:22:26.560 --> 0:22:29.119
<v Speaker 2>to industry and re later to services, more and more

0:22:29.119 --> 0:22:31.359
<v Speaker 2>people end up in the cities. By twenty one hundred,

0:22:31.440 --> 0:22:33.679
<v Speaker 2>something like eighty percent of humanity will be in the cities,

0:22:33.840 --> 0:22:37.240
<v Speaker 2>which means that we will depopulate areas in which we

0:22:37.400 --> 0:22:40.719
<v Speaker 2>currently live and where we disrupt the natural flow of

0:22:40.840 --> 0:22:44.960
<v Speaker 2>flora and fauna, and that will bounce back. So the

0:22:45.000 --> 0:22:46.919
<v Speaker 2>best thing that you can do for the environment is

0:22:46.960 --> 0:22:51.240
<v Speaker 2>really to urbanize and to become as agricultural efficient as possible.

0:22:51.600 --> 0:22:56.520
<v Speaker 2>So the Greens, I'm afraid, are riven with contradictions. On

0:22:56.560 --> 0:23:00.399
<v Speaker 2>the one hand, they don't want to build nuclear power

0:23:00.400 --> 0:23:03.680
<v Speaker 2>stations even though they don't emit CO two, and they

0:23:03.720 --> 0:23:07.640
<v Speaker 2>are the best solution that we have currently to reducing

0:23:07.720 --> 0:23:12.240
<v Speaker 2>CO two in the atmosphere. It's more expensive than gas.

0:23:12.280 --> 0:23:15.119
<v Speaker 2>Gas still produces some CO two in the atmosphere, but

0:23:15.200 --> 0:23:17.399
<v Speaker 2>much less so than coal. But you know, if we

0:23:17.440 --> 0:23:20.160
<v Speaker 2>could switch all of humanity to gas and then eventually

0:23:20.200 --> 0:23:22.680
<v Speaker 2>to nuclear, then we would be able to reduce COO

0:23:22.680 --> 0:23:26.480
<v Speaker 2>two dramatically. Another thing which the Greens are against is GMOs.

0:23:27.240 --> 0:23:31.119
<v Speaker 2>But suppose that you can genetically modify some of our

0:23:31.760 --> 0:23:34.840
<v Speaker 2>most important crops such as sweet and corn and soy

0:23:34.920 --> 0:23:37.680
<v Speaker 2>and so forth, so that you can produce much more

0:23:37.720 --> 0:23:42.399
<v Speaker 2>per acre. That means that you can feed growing global

0:23:42.400 --> 0:23:45.720
<v Speaker 2>population on fewer and fewer acres of land, which means

0:23:45.720 --> 0:23:48.359
<v Speaker 2>that you can return more and more acres of land

0:23:48.440 --> 0:23:54.040
<v Speaker 2>back to flora and fauna. So there are solutions for

0:23:54.440 --> 0:24:01.200
<v Speaker 2>environmental comeback that modern society offers, and I if you're

0:24:01.240 --> 0:24:04.439
<v Speaker 2>open minded about it, and the Greens very often aren't.

0:24:05.680 --> 0:24:10.960
<v Speaker 2>And I'm not even talking about like the extinction movement,

0:24:11.440 --> 0:24:14.439
<v Speaker 2>which also holds promise for the future where we'll be

0:24:14.480 --> 0:24:18.680
<v Speaker 2>able to basically use the DNA of dead or extinct

0:24:18.760 --> 0:24:20.200
<v Speaker 2>animals in order to bring them back.

0:24:21.520 --> 0:24:24.639
<v Speaker 1>We got more to get to. Specifically, it takes so

0:24:24.720 --> 0:24:27.800
<v Speaker 1>much less time to buy almost all of the goods

0:24:27.800 --> 0:24:30.679
<v Speaker 1>and services that we enjoy. We'll talk about why that

0:24:30.800 --> 0:24:41.040
<v Speaker 1>is with Mary and Tupe right after this. I'm still

0:24:41.080 --> 0:24:43.440
<v Speaker 1>talking with Mary and twopee and I want Mary and

0:24:43.440 --> 0:24:46.400
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk about specifically your book Superabundance. And

0:24:47.000 --> 0:24:49.919
<v Speaker 1>this was released in twenty twenty two and to me,

0:24:50.160 --> 0:24:53.520
<v Speaker 1>like as I was reading it, it was striking because

0:24:53.560 --> 0:24:55.840
<v Speaker 1>you put things in terms there were so much easier

0:24:55.840 --> 0:24:58.240
<v Speaker 1>to understand. And part of what made it easy to

0:24:58.280 --> 0:25:01.800
<v Speaker 1>comprehend was when you talk about time prices, how long

0:25:02.080 --> 0:25:05.680
<v Speaker 1>specifically people must work to be able to afford every

0:25:05.760 --> 0:25:09.000
<v Speaker 1>day items. Talk about that concept like how does that,

0:25:09.200 --> 0:25:11.480
<v Speaker 1>how can that help maybe us appreciate the progress that

0:25:11.480 --> 0:25:13.360
<v Speaker 1>we've made and what sort of progress have we made

0:25:13.359 --> 0:25:15.560
<v Speaker 1>when we look at the concept of time prices.

0:25:15.920 --> 0:25:18.760
<v Speaker 2>Well, time prices have been implemented in the book by

0:25:18.840 --> 0:25:24.040
<v Speaker 2>necessity because we wanted to see how much cheaper resources

0:25:24.240 --> 0:25:28.880
<v Speaker 2>are today than they used to be before. I mean,

0:25:29.080 --> 0:25:31.840
<v Speaker 2>the idea that most people subscribe to is a zero

0:25:31.960 --> 0:25:34.480
<v Speaker 2>sum idea, which is that the more people you have,

0:25:35.359 --> 0:25:38.480
<v Speaker 2>the more resources they use. Therefore resources are becoming more

0:25:38.520 --> 0:25:42.640
<v Speaker 2>expensive and scarcer. The opposite is true, resources are becoming

0:25:42.800 --> 0:25:45.480
<v Speaker 2>cheaper as you have more people in the world because

0:25:45.480 --> 0:25:50.920
<v Speaker 2>people bring new ideas and they basically grow the resource

0:25:50.960 --> 0:25:55.359
<v Speaker 2>by But since we were going back to eighteen fifty.

0:25:55.600 --> 0:25:58.080
<v Speaker 2>We simply didn't have the currencies, and we didn't have

0:25:58.119 --> 0:26:00.560
<v Speaker 2>the exchange rates, and we didn't have the inflation rates,

0:26:00.600 --> 0:26:03.840
<v Speaker 2>so we couldn't use normal currencies. So we simply what

0:26:03.960 --> 0:26:06.960
<v Speaker 2>we asked ourselves is basically, how long did people have

0:26:07.040 --> 0:26:10.480
<v Speaker 2>to work in order to buy a bag of potatoes

0:26:10.600 --> 0:26:13.600
<v Speaker 2>or a bag of oranges, or a bunch of bananas,

0:26:13.960 --> 0:26:15.920
<v Speaker 2>or a pound of beef or a pound of pork

0:26:15.960 --> 0:26:19.119
<v Speaker 2>and whatever else. And so that was done by necessity,

0:26:19.320 --> 0:26:23.080
<v Speaker 2>but it's also a smart way. I think that everybody

0:26:23.080 --> 0:26:26.560
<v Speaker 2>should do it to measure human well being or rather

0:26:27.000 --> 0:26:33.160
<v Speaker 2>abundance or prosperity, simply because it is a Everybody has

0:26:33.240 --> 0:26:35.679
<v Speaker 2>only twenty four hours in a day. So if you

0:26:35.720 --> 0:26:38.199
<v Speaker 2>are an Indian peasant, for example, and you are spending

0:26:38.200 --> 0:26:40.840
<v Speaker 2>six hours a day to earn enough money to buy

0:26:40.880 --> 0:26:43.920
<v Speaker 2>your food, but an American can do it in ten minutes,

0:26:44.840 --> 0:26:48.280
<v Speaker 2>that makes a difference. So what we really want is

0:26:48.800 --> 0:26:52.840
<v Speaker 2>for people to spend less and less time during their

0:26:52.920 --> 0:27:00.199
<v Speaker 2>work day to spend on necessities clothing, food, housing, that

0:27:00.280 --> 0:27:04.679
<v Speaker 2>sort of thing, and have more time to work to

0:27:04.760 --> 0:27:09.520
<v Speaker 2>earn money for leisure or education or alternatively, just not

0:27:09.640 --> 0:27:12.280
<v Speaker 2>working at all. And you know, have time off and

0:27:12.400 --> 0:27:16.159
<v Speaker 2>enjoy it with your family. So it makes it so

0:27:16.760 --> 0:27:20.200
<v Speaker 2>it made accounting sense for the book, but it also

0:27:20.280 --> 0:27:24.160
<v Speaker 2>makes sense from a moral or ethical standpoint, because what

0:27:24.200 --> 0:27:29.600
<v Speaker 2>you really want to do is a measure how much

0:27:30.680 --> 0:27:36.080
<v Speaker 2>more time we have today? Too? Well, let me put

0:27:36.119 --> 0:27:40.240
<v Speaker 2>it this way, because we work so little time to

0:27:40.280 --> 0:27:43.520
<v Speaker 2>earn the food that we eat, for example, we have

0:27:43.640 --> 0:27:46.720
<v Speaker 2>much more time to earn the money to travel to

0:27:46.880 --> 0:27:51.080
<v Speaker 2>Argentina for example, or you know, or buy a car,

0:27:51.320 --> 0:27:53.879
<v Speaker 2>which which an Indian cannot because most of the time

0:27:54.800 --> 0:27:58.560
<v Speaker 2>he spends working, he's working to provide food for his family.

0:27:59.359 --> 0:27:59.919
<v Speaker 2>So what is it?

0:28:00.080 --> 0:28:02.359
<v Speaker 1>So? Is that what it means then, to be able

0:28:02.400 --> 0:28:04.280
<v Speaker 1>to spend so much less time to buy let's say

0:28:04.280 --> 0:28:07.159
<v Speaker 1>a pound of sugar or an hour of light like

0:28:07.480 --> 0:28:09.520
<v Speaker 1>the light bulbs and the energy that it costs to

0:28:09.600 --> 0:28:13.399
<v Speaker 1>light our homes. It doesn't mean it means more leisure,

0:28:13.480 --> 0:28:18.280
<v Speaker 1>more ability to consume new products that are made Like,

0:28:18.280 --> 0:28:20.520
<v Speaker 1>what else does it really mean that we have such

0:28:20.560 --> 0:28:24.760
<v Speaker 1>an abundance of extra time because it cost us less

0:28:24.760 --> 0:28:28.320
<v Speaker 1>of our working hours, less time of working to get

0:28:28.320 --> 0:28:29.399
<v Speaker 1>the money to buy that stuff.

0:28:29.760 --> 0:28:33.399
<v Speaker 2>Well, essentially, it means abundance. It means prosperity. The reason

0:28:33.440 --> 0:28:37.600
<v Speaker 2>why an American house looks very different from a Brazilian

0:28:37.800 --> 0:28:43.400
<v Speaker 2>favela or an African hut is because because we don't

0:28:43.440 --> 0:28:48.560
<v Speaker 2>have to spend all this time working to buy our food,

0:28:48.640 --> 0:28:53.720
<v Speaker 2>for example, right, you know, we have much more time

0:28:53.960 --> 0:28:57.320
<v Speaker 2>left after we earn enough money to buy our food,

0:28:57.440 --> 0:29:01.600
<v Speaker 2>to buy refrigerator and a tea and two cars in

0:29:01.640 --> 0:29:06.560
<v Speaker 2>a garage, and books and tables and chairs and everything else.

0:29:06.680 --> 0:29:10.680
<v Speaker 2>So if you look at a middle class American house today,

0:29:10.720 --> 0:29:13.040
<v Speaker 2>it looks very different from an African hut or Brazilian

0:29:13.080 --> 0:29:18.080
<v Speaker 2>favela precisely because we can buy so much more with

0:29:18.200 --> 0:29:21.680
<v Speaker 2>our time than Africans or Brazilians can.

0:29:22.520 --> 0:29:25.640
<v Speaker 1>I think about like limited resources like oil, even that

0:29:25.720 --> 0:29:28.040
<v Speaker 1>has gotten cheaper over time, and that seems kind of

0:29:28.160 --> 0:29:32.239
<v Speaker 1>counterintuitive that a scarce resource could get less expensive. And

0:29:32.280 --> 0:29:34.280
<v Speaker 1>when you think about twenty thirty years ago, some of

0:29:34.320 --> 0:29:38.280
<v Speaker 1>the predictions about peak oil, those haven't really come to pass.

0:29:38.760 --> 0:29:42.440
<v Speaker 1>And gas prices are not six dollars a gallon where

0:29:42.440 --> 0:29:42.760
<v Speaker 1>I live.

0:29:43.120 --> 0:29:46.840
<v Speaker 2>So what do you explain that, Well, it's just that

0:29:46.920 --> 0:29:49.720
<v Speaker 2>it's not as scarce as people thought it was. So

0:29:49.800 --> 0:29:55.520
<v Speaker 2>for example, using the old drilling methods. Many American oil

0:29:55.560 --> 0:30:00.160
<v Speaker 2>fields where quote unquote exhausted in the nineteen eight tea,

0:30:00.280 --> 0:30:03.680
<v Speaker 2>in the nineteen nineties, but then somebody again we are

0:30:03.680 --> 0:30:07.320
<v Speaker 2>going to going back to population and ideas. Then somebody

0:30:07.320 --> 0:30:10.120
<v Speaker 2>came up with the idea of fracking. And so what

0:30:10.240 --> 0:30:13.320
<v Speaker 2>you do. You return back to those oil fields which

0:30:13.360 --> 0:30:17.600
<v Speaker 2>are exhausted with the old technology, and you apply this

0:30:17.840 --> 0:30:20.480
<v Speaker 2>new technology, which is fracking, and you are able to

0:30:20.520 --> 0:30:23.760
<v Speaker 2>get so much oil and gas out of those out

0:30:23.760 --> 0:30:28.959
<v Speaker 2>of those same oil fields that America today is the

0:30:28.960 --> 0:30:33.640
<v Speaker 2>world's greatest export of oil and gas. Right, So that

0:30:33.880 --> 0:30:39.280
<v Speaker 2>is one example of how you can how something that

0:30:39.480 --> 0:30:44.920
<v Speaker 2>is supposedly scarce becomes less scarce. And even if at

0:30:44.920 --> 0:30:48.120
<v Speaker 2>some point in the future we run out of oil

0:30:48.200 --> 0:30:51.400
<v Speaker 2>in the ground, you can of course turn coal into oil.

0:30:52.400 --> 0:30:55.320
<v Speaker 2>The Germans during the Second World War and South Africans

0:30:55.400 --> 0:30:58.920
<v Speaker 2>under apartheid were able to do that. We have the

0:30:58.960 --> 0:31:01.880
<v Speaker 2>technology to do that. So you may go through an

0:31:01.920 --> 0:31:06.480
<v Speaker 2>extra step to get to oil, but you can still

0:31:06.520 --> 0:31:09.760
<v Speaker 2>do so. And we have coal deposits lasting us for

0:31:09.800 --> 0:31:11.480
<v Speaker 2>tens of thousands of years, and of course by that

0:31:11.560 --> 0:31:14.240
<v Speaker 2>time will be already switched over to a different kind

0:31:14.280 --> 0:31:14.840
<v Speaker 2>of energy.

0:31:14.960 --> 0:31:17.320
<v Speaker 1>Source and so forth as a human ingenuity.

0:31:18.040 --> 0:31:21.120
<v Speaker 2>Because of human ingenuity, Yes, I mean, eventually we want

0:31:21.120 --> 0:31:23.959
<v Speaker 2>to get to a place where all of our energy

0:31:23.960 --> 0:31:27.800
<v Speaker 2>comes from the sun for example, right, yeah, which you

0:31:27.840 --> 0:31:30.120
<v Speaker 2>know there are there are a lot of sci fi

0:31:30.800 --> 0:31:34.840
<v Speaker 2>sort of ways of doing that. The technology is currently

0:31:34.880 --> 0:31:37.200
<v Speaker 2>not that. And fusion. You know, if we have fusion

0:31:37.240 --> 0:31:42.440
<v Speaker 2>and we have solar and maybe thermal thermal energy, you know,

0:31:42.480 --> 0:31:45.320
<v Speaker 2>we'll be able to get away from from fossil fuels altogether.

0:31:45.600 --> 0:31:47.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to make light of income inequality, and

0:31:47.360 --> 0:31:49.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to make light of people who don't

0:31:49.760 --> 0:31:55.280
<v Speaker 1>have nearly the same resources, whether it's because of their

0:31:55.720 --> 0:31:59.120
<v Speaker 1>familial ancestry. I had a more difficult life than I

0:31:59.200 --> 0:32:01.880
<v Speaker 1>have or and you have. I don't know, But what

0:32:01.920 --> 0:32:04.560
<v Speaker 1>would you say to a US citizen listening to this

0:32:04.640 --> 0:32:08.400
<v Speaker 1>podcast who thinks they're poor? Well, and especially when you

0:32:08.400 --> 0:32:11.480
<v Speaker 1>think about the global context, like, how would you I

0:32:11.480 --> 0:32:14.080
<v Speaker 1>don't know, I'm curious how you would speak to someone

0:32:14.120 --> 0:32:14.440
<v Speaker 1>like that.

0:32:15.120 --> 0:32:19.800
<v Speaker 2>Well, at a metal level, I don't consider inequality to

0:32:19.840 --> 0:32:22.760
<v Speaker 2>be a proper measure of human well being. I consider

0:32:23.040 --> 0:32:25.600
<v Speaker 2>poverty to be or reduction in poverty to be a

0:32:25.640 --> 0:32:28.440
<v Speaker 2>proper measure of human well being. So I don't really

0:32:28.480 --> 0:32:32.640
<v Speaker 2>care that Jeff Bezos is worth three hundred billion dollars

0:32:32.680 --> 0:32:36.080
<v Speaker 2>and Elon Musk is worth five hundred billion dollars. It's

0:32:36.080 --> 0:32:39.440
<v Speaker 2>not a zero sum game. They've grown the economic pie,

0:32:40.280 --> 0:32:43.680
<v Speaker 2>and consequently the fact that they are super rich has

0:32:43.720 --> 0:32:47.480
<v Speaker 2>no negative impact on my life or the lives of

0:32:47.480 --> 0:32:51.000
<v Speaker 2>the fellow Americans. In other words, they didn't take anything

0:32:51.200 --> 0:32:55.640
<v Speaker 2>from fellow Americans. So that is not a proper measure

0:32:55.680 --> 0:32:58.360
<v Speaker 2>of human well being. What is happening at the bottom

0:32:58.400 --> 0:33:01.280
<v Speaker 2>of the income letter is of concern. That is a

0:33:01.280 --> 0:33:04.360
<v Speaker 2>proper measure of well being. What we want to see

0:33:04.960 --> 0:33:08.640
<v Speaker 2>is wages for the bottom ten percent or bottom twenty

0:33:08.680 --> 0:33:13.320
<v Speaker 2>percent to continue to increase, and you can really only

0:33:13.360 --> 0:33:17.000
<v Speaker 2>do that in a growing economy where there's competition for labor.

0:33:17.600 --> 0:33:21.840
<v Speaker 2>And when it comes to Americans specifically, we are of

0:33:21.880 --> 0:33:25.040
<v Speaker 2>course the richest large country in the world. There are

0:33:25.040 --> 0:33:28.080
<v Speaker 2>some countries which are richer per capita. They tend to

0:33:28.120 --> 0:33:31.400
<v Speaker 2>be much smaller, and they tend to be they tend

0:33:31.400 --> 0:33:34.640
<v Speaker 2>to have a specific set of characteristics, like for example,

0:33:34.680 --> 0:33:37.720
<v Speaker 2>Norway has very few people, but it has so much

0:33:37.800 --> 0:33:42.960
<v Speaker 2>oil that basically that basically they have trillions of dollars

0:33:43.000 --> 0:33:47.640
<v Speaker 2>in their sovereign fund. And even then, you know, going

0:33:47.640 --> 0:33:50.200
<v Speaker 2>for dinner in Norway is a nightmare because it's so expensive,

0:33:50.640 --> 0:33:51.240
<v Speaker 2>and you.

0:33:51.200 --> 0:33:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Know it isn't once it was very very expensive.

0:33:53.000 --> 0:33:56.239
<v Speaker 2>I can attest, yeah, because of taxes, and you have

0:33:56.360 --> 0:33:59.960
<v Speaker 2>similar situation in some of the Middle East and cheekdoms

0:34:00.280 --> 0:34:05.080
<v Speaker 2>like United Arab Emerits and so forth. But in terms

0:34:05.160 --> 0:34:12.680
<v Speaker 2>of Americans as such, we are of course living miraculously

0:34:12.760 --> 0:34:18.680
<v Speaker 2>better than our ancestors, and we are living extraordinarily well

0:34:18.719 --> 0:34:22.960
<v Speaker 2>compared to the rest of the world. The Chinese income

0:34:23.000 --> 0:34:27.160
<v Speaker 2>per capita is something like median income per capita is

0:34:27.200 --> 0:34:29.719
<v Speaker 2>something like thirteen or fourteen thousand dollars, so they at

0:34:29.800 --> 0:34:33.799
<v Speaker 2>the same level as Mexico, whereas whereas the United States

0:34:33.880 --> 0:34:37.239
<v Speaker 2>is fifty or sixty thousand dollars per person, so we

0:34:37.320 --> 0:34:40.279
<v Speaker 2>are simply much richer than even our competitors.

0:34:40.760 --> 0:34:42.759
<v Speaker 1>This might not be a question. I don't know if

0:34:42.760 --> 0:34:45.960
<v Speaker 1>you ever gotten asked this question before, but when how

0:34:45.960 --> 0:34:48.799
<v Speaker 1>can understanding human progress change the way that we as

0:34:48.840 --> 0:34:52.160
<v Speaker 1>individuals think about personal finance or long term investing. Because

0:34:52.640 --> 0:34:56.120
<v Speaker 1>with you talking about progress, and especially in an economy

0:34:56.200 --> 0:34:59.440
<v Speaker 1>like ours, man, I want to invest in that progress,

0:34:59.480 --> 0:35:03.080
<v Speaker 1>so I can rea some of the benefit. Yeah, how

0:35:03.080 --> 0:35:05.160
<v Speaker 1>would you talk to somebody who was wondering about their

0:35:05.160 --> 0:35:06.920
<v Speaker 1>personal finances or their investing life.

0:35:07.080 --> 0:35:09.719
<v Speaker 2>Gosh, you know, I'm not an investor, God knows, I've

0:35:09.760 --> 0:35:12.920
<v Speaker 2>made a lot of mistakes in the stock market myself.

0:35:13.840 --> 0:35:19.799
<v Speaker 2>But basically, if anybody is approaching investment thinking, okay, let

0:35:19.840 --> 0:35:24.360
<v Speaker 2>me invest in raw materials. You know, because the population

0:35:24.480 --> 0:35:27.360
<v Speaker 2>is increasing and we are consuming more stuff and consequently

0:35:27.440 --> 0:35:30.240
<v Speaker 2>things must become more expensive. That's not really how it works.

0:35:30.360 --> 0:35:34.080
<v Speaker 2>So it's really a negative investment strategy. I would say

0:35:34.480 --> 0:35:37.759
<v Speaker 2>to invest in raw materials. Now you can chance upon

0:35:38.400 --> 0:35:41.960
<v Speaker 2>a time when raw materials do become more expensive, like,

0:35:42.000 --> 0:35:44.440
<v Speaker 2>for example, the first decade of the twenty first century,

0:35:44.760 --> 0:35:47.719
<v Speaker 2>when China really took off and started growing at a

0:35:47.800 --> 0:35:50.240
<v Speaker 2>very fast click. They were consuming so many raw materials

0:35:50.239 --> 0:35:53.440
<v Speaker 2>that raw materials actually increased in price. But you know,

0:35:53.880 --> 0:35:57.040
<v Speaker 2>at twenty or thirty or forty year strategy, investing in

0:35:57.200 --> 0:36:00.920
<v Speaker 2>raw materials is probably not a good idea. But what

0:36:01.200 --> 0:36:08.680
<v Speaker 2>drives economy forward is technology, really, and so being exposed

0:36:08.760 --> 0:36:13.520
<v Speaker 2>to tech stocks is probably a better idea. Again, this

0:36:13.640 --> 0:36:17.600
<v Speaker 2>is just how I read how I read the lessons

0:36:17.600 --> 0:36:21.800
<v Speaker 2>from our book is that what drives human progress forward

0:36:21.880 --> 0:36:23.279
<v Speaker 2>is really new technology.

0:36:23.960 --> 0:36:27.480
<v Speaker 1>So a recent Pew study found that fifty seven percent

0:36:27.520 --> 0:36:30.279
<v Speaker 1>of people said that their children are going to grow

0:36:30.360 --> 0:36:32.600
<v Speaker 1>up to be worse off financially than their parents. And

0:36:32.640 --> 0:36:35.560
<v Speaker 1>this is a reversal of the American optimism that I

0:36:35.600 --> 0:36:38.799
<v Speaker 1>think has kind of been at the heart of who

0:36:38.840 --> 0:36:41.920
<v Speaker 1>we are as a country. It's gotten down to significantly

0:36:41.960 --> 0:36:44.560
<v Speaker 1>over the years. So how is that possible? Does this

0:36:44.600 --> 0:36:46.920
<v Speaker 1>go back to kind of the beginning of our conversation,

0:36:46.960 --> 0:36:49.480
<v Speaker 1>how is it possible? Given the progress that's been made,

0:36:49.640 --> 0:36:52.600
<v Speaker 1>and specifically in this country that's been keenly felt, why

0:36:52.640 --> 0:36:55.640
<v Speaker 1>are we so pestimistic about the future and the ability

0:36:55.640 --> 0:36:57.400
<v Speaker 1>of our children to do better than we have?

0:36:58.320 --> 0:37:02.280
<v Speaker 2>There is a very strange thing going on whereby people

0:37:02.480 --> 0:37:05.200
<v Speaker 2>in the United States, but other places in the world

0:37:05.239 --> 0:37:08.800
<v Speaker 2>as well, are much more optimistic about the personal lives

0:37:08.840 --> 0:37:13.000
<v Speaker 2>than about the society as a whole. So there is

0:37:13.040 --> 0:37:18.120
<v Speaker 2>about thirty point difference on average if you ask people

0:37:18.840 --> 0:37:21.799
<v Speaker 2>how are you doing financially? Oh, I'm doing okay, you know,

0:37:21.920 --> 0:37:24.680
<v Speaker 2>things are fine. How is America doing? Oh, it's going

0:37:24.719 --> 0:37:29.200
<v Speaker 2>to help. And this is this is a consistent finding

0:37:29.880 --> 0:37:35.319
<v Speaker 2>in in opinion polls, and that I think has to

0:37:35.320 --> 0:37:37.880
<v Speaker 2>do with the fact that you know, when when you

0:37:38.160 --> 0:37:40.600
<v Speaker 2>are looking at your life, you can you can speak

0:37:40.680 --> 0:37:44.560
<v Speaker 2>much more objectively about where you are today as opposed

0:37:44.560 --> 0:37:48.560
<v Speaker 2>to last year, whether your income has grown and so forth,

0:37:48.960 --> 0:37:52.080
<v Speaker 2>Whereas if you are looking at society there is probably

0:37:52.080 --> 0:37:55.959
<v Speaker 2>that negative emotion contagion going on where where you only

0:37:56.000 --> 0:37:59.440
<v Speaker 2>hear bad things about the United States, and so you

0:37:59.440 --> 0:38:01.719
<v Speaker 2>you know, you you internalize that for the country, even

0:38:01.760 --> 0:38:03.799
<v Speaker 2>though you personally are doing well. Now, I don't want

0:38:03.840 --> 0:38:08.400
<v Speaker 2>to be too blase about it. Of course, there are possibilities.

0:38:08.680 --> 0:38:12.840
<v Speaker 2>Of course, there are scenarios under which the future generations

0:38:12.840 --> 0:38:17.680
<v Speaker 2>could be poorer. If, for example, we shut ourselves off

0:38:17.840 --> 0:38:22.520
<v Speaker 2>from global trade, we will be poorer. If we elect

0:38:22.600 --> 0:38:27.960
<v Speaker 2>a socialist to the presidency, we will be poorer. There

0:38:27.960 --> 0:38:31.280
<v Speaker 2>are scenarios as such. Yes, I we shouldn't be too blase.

0:38:31.560 --> 0:38:34.040
<v Speaker 1>In some ways you're pointing to not to I try

0:38:34.040 --> 0:38:35.840
<v Speaker 1>to avoid politics on the show, but you're pointing to

0:38:35.920 --> 0:38:40.080
<v Speaker 1>both parties that could lead, of course to places that

0:38:40.160 --> 0:38:43.560
<v Speaker 1>are not great, and so I just I just want

0:38:43.600 --> 0:38:44.400
<v Speaker 1>to point that out there.

0:38:44.400 --> 0:38:46.520
<v Speaker 2>I don't, of course, but I mean that. That is

0:38:46.520 --> 0:38:49.800
<v Speaker 2>why I've chosen examples from both parties is because both

0:38:49.840 --> 0:38:55.919
<v Speaker 2>parties are have become parties of victimhood, where the politicians,

0:38:56.400 --> 0:39:01.200
<v Speaker 2>both Republican and Democrats, are basically telling their electorates the

0:39:01.239 --> 0:39:05.000
<v Speaker 2>world is set against you. Everybody is exploiting you in

0:39:05.040 --> 0:39:07.480
<v Speaker 2>spite of the fact that you are the most lucky

0:39:07.640 --> 0:39:11.279
<v Speaker 2>generation in global history, in the luckiest one of the

0:39:11.320 --> 0:39:14.480
<v Speaker 2>luckiest places in the world. You know, everything sucks because

0:39:14.520 --> 0:39:17.080
<v Speaker 2>that's how you keep people, That's how you keep your

0:39:17.080 --> 0:39:21.320
<v Speaker 2>troops constantly anxious and constantly voting for you and supporting

0:39:21.320 --> 0:39:25.560
<v Speaker 2>you financially. And it's the wrong way to go about it.

0:39:26.480 --> 0:39:27.680
<v Speaker 2>But both parties are guilty.

0:39:28.520 --> 0:39:31.760
<v Speaker 1>What's one data point about global progress that still blows

0:39:31.760 --> 0:39:34.400
<v Speaker 1>your mind? Maybe something that you found when writing the

0:39:34.400 --> 0:39:37.879
<v Speaker 1>book Super Abundance, or something that you featured recently on

0:39:38.040 --> 0:39:41.480
<v Speaker 1>the website Human Progress. Like, what is something that maybe

0:39:42.400 --> 0:39:44.680
<v Speaker 1>or when people are asking for like a factoid that

0:39:44.840 --> 0:39:47.640
<v Speaker 1>just is like ridiculous of human flourishing.

0:39:47.680 --> 0:39:52.120
<v Speaker 2>What would you point to, Well, look, the obvious things

0:39:52.120 --> 0:39:55.839
<v Speaker 2>would be life expectancy. I enjoy life. I recommend that

0:39:55.920 --> 0:39:59.839
<v Speaker 2>people you know, stop worrying too much and enjoy life.

0:39:59.840 --> 0:40:04.560
<v Speaker 2>To and the fact is that life expectancy, you know,

0:40:04.560 --> 0:40:07.920
<v Speaker 2>two hundred years ago was about thirty years and today

0:40:08.120 --> 0:40:11.560
<v Speaker 2>it's in the United States approaching eighty. So we are

0:40:11.600 --> 0:40:15.640
<v Speaker 2>given an opportunity to enjoy twice almost three times as

0:40:15.680 --> 0:40:17.480
<v Speaker 2>much life as we as we would have had in

0:40:17.480 --> 0:40:20.440
<v Speaker 2>the past. But if you're asking me about the specific statistic,

0:40:21.320 --> 0:40:26.000
<v Speaker 2>given that Thanksgiving is coming up, we wrote an article

0:40:26.400 --> 0:40:29.640
<v Speaker 2>last year and will probably write an article this year

0:40:29.800 --> 0:40:33.560
<v Speaker 2>as well, about the price of Thanksgiving, a time price

0:40:33.600 --> 0:40:41.000
<v Speaker 2>of Thanksgiving, and on our calculation, basically, an American worker

0:40:41.360 --> 0:40:47.160
<v Speaker 2>today can buy one point seven Thanksgiving dinners for the

0:40:47.160 --> 0:40:49.360
<v Speaker 2>same amount of time that he or she would have

0:40:49.400 --> 0:40:52.200
<v Speaker 2>to pay for it in nineteen eighty six. Eighty six

0:40:52.440 --> 0:40:54.440
<v Speaker 2>is Reagan was president.

0:40:54.360 --> 0:40:54.440
<v Speaker 1>But.

0:40:56.200 --> 0:40:59.760
<v Speaker 2>Eighty six is the first year for which we have data. Basically,

0:40:59.800 --> 0:41:04.319
<v Speaker 2>the American Farming Bureau started tracking down the price of

0:41:04.600 --> 0:41:09.960
<v Speaker 2>turkey and cranberry sauce and you know, buns and whatever else,

0:41:10.000 --> 0:41:12.680
<v Speaker 2>and they put it in this basket of commodities. How

0:41:12.760 --> 0:41:15.040
<v Speaker 2>you could, you know, feed a bunch of people for

0:41:15.200 --> 0:41:21.839
<v Speaker 2>Thanksgiving dinner? And then we track that over time all

0:41:21.880 --> 0:41:24.279
<v Speaker 2>the way to twenty twenty four, and I'm sure we

0:41:24.320 --> 0:41:27.840
<v Speaker 2>will do one for twenty twenty five, and basically what

0:41:27.920 --> 0:41:31.000
<v Speaker 2>we find is the relative to human labor or relative

0:41:31.040 --> 0:41:34.080
<v Speaker 2>to time that you have to spend working to earn

0:41:34.160 --> 0:41:39.120
<v Speaker 2>that money to buy Thanksgiving dinner has dropped by has

0:41:39.160 --> 0:41:41.640
<v Speaker 2>dropped so much that now you're getting one point seven

0:41:41.680 --> 0:41:43.600
<v Speaker 2>dinners for the same amount of time that you would

0:41:43.600 --> 0:41:45.279
<v Speaker 2>have gotten one in nineteen eighty six.

0:41:45.719 --> 0:41:48.560
<v Speaker 1>So like deflation in terms of time prices.

0:41:48.520 --> 0:41:52.640
<v Speaker 2>Oh, certainly, And there's deflation going on throughout the economy.

0:41:52.680 --> 0:41:54.960
<v Speaker 2>I mean, if you look at your iPhone and you

0:41:55.000 --> 0:41:59.440
<v Speaker 2>adjust for quality, then deflation is definitely going on, definitely

0:42:00.320 --> 0:42:02.440
<v Speaker 2>going on once you are just for quality when it

0:42:02.480 --> 0:42:04.680
<v Speaker 2>comes to cars and food, et cetera.

0:42:04.360 --> 0:42:07.120
<v Speaker 1>And deflate for all of the things the other gadgets

0:42:07.160 --> 0:42:08.920
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to buy because your iPhone does all

0:42:08.960 --> 0:42:10.359
<v Speaker 1>those things now precisely.

0:42:10.480 --> 0:42:13.680
<v Speaker 2>So, wherever the market is allowed to function properly, wherever

0:42:13.719 --> 0:42:18.160
<v Speaker 2>you have competition, you you know, prices tend to go

0:42:18.239 --> 0:42:21.880
<v Speaker 2>down relative to labor. But that is not true for

0:42:21.960 --> 0:42:26.640
<v Speaker 2>the entire economy. In healthcare, for example, or in education,

0:42:26.840 --> 0:42:29.800
<v Speaker 2>when when you have a lot of government meddling, subsidies

0:42:29.920 --> 0:42:33.000
<v Speaker 2>and restrictions to entry and so forth, you can actually

0:42:33.000 --> 0:42:36.520
<v Speaker 2>have a situation where things become more expensive relative to

0:42:37.120 --> 0:42:43.320
<v Speaker 2>working time. But places where the American economy is quite open,

0:42:44.560 --> 0:42:48.080
<v Speaker 2>you know, where American farmers, for example, can work without

0:42:48.120 --> 0:42:51.799
<v Speaker 2>too many regulations, or we can import stuff that we

0:42:51.840 --> 0:42:54.400
<v Speaker 2>don't grow in the United States, things tend to go

0:42:54.440 --> 0:42:55.080
<v Speaker 2>down in price.

0:42:56.360 --> 0:42:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Man. There's so much good academic knowledge that you've offered. Man,

0:43:00.719 --> 0:43:02.520
<v Speaker 1>I want to get into your personal story a little bit,

0:43:02.600 --> 0:43:06.799
<v Speaker 1>which is fascinating. How and why this is meaningful to

0:43:06.880 --> 0:43:10.080
<v Speaker 1>you because of how you grew up. We'll get to

0:43:10.120 --> 0:43:20.040
<v Speaker 1>that and more right after this. We're still talking with

0:43:20.120 --> 0:43:23.080
<v Speaker 1>Maria to be about how the world is getting better.

0:43:23.320 --> 0:43:25.759
<v Speaker 1>Got a few more questions for you, Marion. I heard

0:43:25.760 --> 0:43:28.680
<v Speaker 1>your co author Gail Pooley of superbund It say the

0:43:28.719 --> 0:43:32.120
<v Speaker 1>difference between rich and poor is five years. What do

0:43:32.120 --> 0:43:32.880
<v Speaker 1>you think he meant when he.

0:43:32.880 --> 0:43:36.000
<v Speaker 2>Said that difference between rich and poor? Well, I don't know.

0:43:36.080 --> 0:43:38.040
<v Speaker 2>By the way, Gail is the one who writes our

0:43:38.160 --> 0:43:42.680
<v Speaker 2>articles on Thanksgiving, so please look out on Human Progress

0:43:42.680 --> 0:43:47.719
<v Speaker 2>website for his latest take on Thanksgiving. But it could be.

0:43:48.160 --> 0:43:51.439
<v Speaker 2>It could be, for example, life expectancy that rich people

0:43:51.480 --> 0:43:55.800
<v Speaker 2>in the United States live longer than poor Americans, partly

0:43:55.840 --> 0:44:01.040
<v Speaker 2>because of bad diet, but are other reasons as well,

0:44:01.160 --> 0:44:02.920
<v Speaker 2>So I don't know specifically what he meant.

0:44:03.080 --> 0:44:04.719
<v Speaker 1>I think one of the things he was referring to

0:44:05.520 --> 0:44:10.359
<v Speaker 1>is the massive price decrease that happens when something new

0:44:10.440 --> 0:44:13.319
<v Speaker 1>comes to the four right, So a new piece of

0:44:13.600 --> 0:44:18.319
<v Speaker 1>some sort of new technology or some sort of new yeah,

0:44:18.440 --> 0:44:21.360
<v Speaker 1>new progress that's made, and it's very expensive, Like early

0:44:21.360 --> 0:44:25.839
<v Speaker 1>adopters end up paying gazillions of dollars sometimes for really

0:44:25.880 --> 0:44:28.960
<v Speaker 1>expensive new things, and because they're willing to fork over

0:44:29.000 --> 0:44:33.160
<v Speaker 1>a ton of money, the price goes down precipitously as

0:44:33.400 --> 0:44:36.759
<v Speaker 1>producers start to make more of those that good for

0:44:36.800 --> 0:44:41.400
<v Speaker 1>the masses. So especially as like a consumer just waiting

0:44:41.600 --> 0:44:43.880
<v Speaker 1>for the price to go down, just waiting five years,

0:44:44.160 --> 0:44:46.399
<v Speaker 1>you can have the same nice thing that the early

0:44:46.440 --> 0:44:48.560
<v Speaker 1>adopter has, but you can pay a fraction of the price.

0:44:49.000 --> 0:44:50.839
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I think that makes a lot of sense. I

0:44:50.960 --> 0:44:54.200
<v Speaker 2>haven't heard Gail say that, but obviously it makes a

0:44:54.200 --> 0:44:57.720
<v Speaker 2>lot of sense. I would recommend that everybody watches Wall

0:44:57.719 --> 0:45:02.560
<v Speaker 2>Street where where the main protagonist walks on the beach

0:45:02.719 --> 0:45:05.239
<v Speaker 2>with an early cell phone. This was in the mid

0:45:05.320 --> 0:45:07.760
<v Speaker 2>nineteen eighties, and it looks like a brick and costs

0:45:08.239 --> 0:45:11.719
<v Speaker 2>thousands of dollars, and basically the battery lasts for a

0:45:11.719 --> 0:45:14.400
<v Speaker 2>couple of hours, and the phone calls are incredibly expensive.

0:45:15.000 --> 0:45:18.439
<v Speaker 2>And today we have this miracle of iPhone, and God

0:45:18.520 --> 0:45:22.080
<v Speaker 2>knows what we will have in the future. Maybe all

0:45:22.160 --> 0:45:25.880
<v Speaker 2>the functionalities of the iPhone will be put into sunglasses

0:45:26.000 --> 0:45:29.560
<v Speaker 2>or something like that, or maybe you know, microchip attached

0:45:29.560 --> 0:45:33.800
<v Speaker 2>to our heads. So I'm very bullish on the future.

0:45:33.840 --> 0:45:39.160
<v Speaker 2>And as Gail says, you know, the rich get there first,

0:45:39.920 --> 0:45:44.360
<v Speaker 2>and they cause a lot of envy and resentment. But

0:45:44.600 --> 0:45:48.360
<v Speaker 2>then things go down in price. Again, going back to

0:45:48.400 --> 0:45:53.200
<v Speaker 2>the Austrian economist Joseph Schumpetter, it is that the beauty

0:45:53.280 --> 0:45:57.400
<v Speaker 2>of capitalism it is that it reduces luxury goods to

0:45:58.719 --> 0:46:01.760
<v Speaker 2>things that an ordinary person. And by my favorite example,

0:46:01.880 --> 0:46:04.520
<v Speaker 2>since you are always interested in examples, is of course,

0:46:04.560 --> 0:46:08.920
<v Speaker 2>what's happening to the price of diamonds now. Artificial diamonds,

0:46:08.920 --> 0:46:11.040
<v Speaker 2>which are not really artificial because they are chemically and

0:46:11.080 --> 0:46:15.640
<v Speaker 2>physically indistinguishable from natural diamonds, are so pervasive and their

0:46:15.680 --> 0:46:18.440
<v Speaker 2>price is dropping so fast that even natural diamonds are

0:46:18.440 --> 0:46:20.719
<v Speaker 2>becoming cheaper and cheaper and cheaper. And so when you

0:46:20.760 --> 0:46:24.000
<v Speaker 2>think about the very definition of luxury, which is a

0:46:24.040 --> 0:46:27.719
<v Speaker 2>diamond necklace for Marie Antoinette or something like that. Even

0:46:27.800 --> 0:46:32.160
<v Speaker 2>those things capitalism can make super abundant for the ordinary

0:46:32.160 --> 0:46:32.880
<v Speaker 2>people like you and I.

0:46:33.320 --> 0:46:36.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, this isn't just academic to you. Can you tell

0:46:36.200 --> 0:46:38.960
<v Speaker 1>me maybe a little bit about growing up for you

0:46:39.080 --> 0:46:43.239
<v Speaker 1>and the reality of growing up in a communist country specifically,

0:46:44.000 --> 0:46:46.799
<v Speaker 1>it feels like this, this is highly academic to you,

0:46:46.800 --> 0:46:47.960
<v Speaker 1>but it's also super personal.

0:46:48.080 --> 0:46:51.360
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's highly academic to me because it's important to

0:46:51.400 --> 0:46:55.600
<v Speaker 2>have facts in one's hands. But yes, it is personal

0:46:55.600 --> 0:46:58.279
<v Speaker 2>to me as well, because I grew up behind the

0:46:58.320 --> 0:47:02.080
<v Speaker 2>Iron Curtain. I grew up in communist Czechoslovakia, where, you know,

0:47:02.160 --> 0:47:07.799
<v Speaker 2>we had constant shortages of basic necessities and not to

0:47:07.880 --> 0:47:12.000
<v Speaker 2>mention lack of political freedom. So I grew up in

0:47:12.040 --> 0:47:16.040
<v Speaker 2>a society which was very poor relative to the United States,

0:47:16.400 --> 0:47:21.160
<v Speaker 2>and coming to the United States was an eye opener,

0:47:21.320 --> 0:47:24.279
<v Speaker 2>you know, to be able to basically get access to

0:47:25.640 --> 0:47:31.960
<v Speaker 2>so much at a relatively affordable cost was Yeah, it

0:47:32.000 --> 0:47:34.520
<v Speaker 2>was a tremendous It was a tremendous improvement in my

0:47:34.640 --> 0:47:39.160
<v Speaker 2>standard of living and also reminded me of the difference

0:47:39.560 --> 0:47:41.439
<v Speaker 2>of what happens when you live in a society which

0:47:41.480 --> 0:47:45.120
<v Speaker 2>doesn't allow the human spirit to flourish and a society

0:47:45.160 --> 0:47:48.920
<v Speaker 2>which does allow human spirit to flourish. So, as an

0:47:48.920 --> 0:47:52.680
<v Speaker 2>intellectual working at a think tank, I tried to it's

0:47:52.719 --> 0:47:55.759
<v Speaker 2>my job to put things in an academic sort of

0:47:55.800 --> 0:48:01.400
<v Speaker 2>way and lead with the evidence and reason. But there

0:48:01.440 --> 0:48:02.759
<v Speaker 2>is a personal story here as well.

0:48:02.920 --> 0:48:06.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, Mary, this has been wonderful. I've really enjoyed

0:48:06.239 --> 0:48:08.360
<v Speaker 1>talking to you. Do you have any like parting words

0:48:08.600 --> 0:48:10.600
<v Speaker 1>or where would you like to send our audience for

0:48:10.680 --> 0:48:15.120
<v Speaker 1>more information and more encouragement about how great the world

0:48:15.239 --> 0:48:17.680
<v Speaker 1>is and how yeah, how do we partake in this

0:48:17.760 --> 0:48:19.279
<v Speaker 1>abundance and enjoy it?

0:48:19.360 --> 0:48:22.400
<v Speaker 2>Well, if I should put my philosophical pants on, what

0:48:22.680 --> 0:48:25.640
<v Speaker 2>I would say to your listeners is the following. You

0:48:25.719 --> 0:48:28.080
<v Speaker 2>are where you are in your life, and there are

0:48:28.080 --> 0:48:30.440
<v Speaker 2>two different perspectives on your life you can take. You

0:48:30.440 --> 0:48:34.160
<v Speaker 2>can compare your life to an idealized version of your

0:48:34.160 --> 0:48:38.880
<v Speaker 2>life where you know everything is perfect, and if you

0:48:38.920 --> 0:48:43.800
<v Speaker 2>do that, then you grow more and more resentful because

0:48:43.880 --> 0:48:47.520
<v Speaker 2>no matter how well off you are compared to the

0:48:47.640 --> 0:48:51.280
<v Speaker 2>ideal state of living, you're always going to come short,

0:48:51.440 --> 0:48:54.680
<v Speaker 2>and so you grow resentful and envious and unhappy. But

0:48:54.719 --> 0:48:57.799
<v Speaker 2>if you compare yourself, so to speak downwards, if you

0:48:57.840 --> 0:49:02.360
<v Speaker 2>compare yourself to thousands of previous generations, and if you

0:49:02.400 --> 0:49:05.560
<v Speaker 2>compare yourself to how people live in other parts of

0:49:05.600 --> 0:49:10.759
<v Speaker 2>the world, then surely the prevalent emotion that you should

0:49:10.840 --> 0:49:13.040
<v Speaker 2>have in your life is one of gratitude that you

0:49:13.160 --> 0:49:17.399
<v Speaker 2>were born in the United States today rather than being

0:49:17.400 --> 0:49:19.520
<v Speaker 2>born in the United States two hundred years ago or

0:49:19.560 --> 0:49:24.000
<v Speaker 2>being born in Nigeria. So I think that having gratitude

0:49:24.040 --> 0:49:27.960
<v Speaker 2>in your life and approach it that way can actually

0:49:28.000 --> 0:49:32.720
<v Speaker 2>make you a happier person. I genuinely believe that happiness

0:49:32.760 --> 0:49:35.040
<v Speaker 2>is a state of mind, and depending on what you

0:49:35.120 --> 0:49:37.200
<v Speaker 2>focus on, you're either going to be miserable or you're

0:49:37.200 --> 0:49:41.040
<v Speaker 2>going to be relatively happy. And that is basically what

0:49:41.680 --> 0:49:44.080
<v Speaker 2>my life's work is devoted to. Please go and check

0:49:44.120 --> 0:49:47.719
<v Speaker 2>out human progress dot org and sign up to our newsletter.

0:49:48.120 --> 0:49:51.799
<v Speaker 2>It's just one email a week that will give you

0:49:52.560 --> 0:49:54.600
<v Speaker 2>all the good news that has happened in the past week.

0:49:54.840 --> 0:49:57.560
<v Speaker 2>And if you don't subscribe, then you will never know

0:49:57.640 --> 0:50:00.680
<v Speaker 2>about it and you will go around breading doom and

0:50:00.680 --> 0:50:05.120
<v Speaker 2>gloom rather than rather than having a much more cheerful disposition.

0:50:05.640 --> 0:50:07.719
<v Speaker 1>Agreed. I think that's a great way to end it.

0:50:07.760 --> 0:50:10.120
<v Speaker 1>And I will put a link to the newsletter sign

0:50:10.239 --> 0:50:13.000
<v Speaker 1>up as well in the show notes up on our website. So,

0:50:13.320 --> 0:50:15.360
<v Speaker 1>Marian Toopy, thank you so much for taking the time today.

0:50:15.560 --> 0:50:16.480
<v Speaker 2>My absolute pleasure.

0:50:17.440 --> 0:50:21.680
<v Speaker 1>Oh Man, what a great conversation. I'm so thankful that

0:50:22.040 --> 0:50:24.839
<v Speaker 1>Marian was able to join me. He's such a busy guy,

0:50:24.920 --> 0:50:29.799
<v Speaker 1>working on such important issues and trying to help us

0:50:29.840 --> 0:50:32.439
<v Speaker 1>all understand a little bit better the world that we're

0:50:32.440 --> 0:50:34.960
<v Speaker 1>living in. And it's one of those things, you know,

0:50:35.000 --> 0:50:38.360
<v Speaker 1>the proverb of the elephants, where someone's holding the trunk,

0:50:38.440 --> 0:50:41.360
<v Speaker 1>someone's holding the center, someone's holding the foot, and you

0:50:41.400 --> 0:50:43.400
<v Speaker 1>don't feel like you're touching the same thing. And I

0:50:43.400 --> 0:50:49.719
<v Speaker 1>think sometimes not knowing right our history, not knowing exactly

0:50:49.880 --> 0:50:52.279
<v Speaker 1>how much progress we've made, not being able to put

0:50:52.280 --> 0:50:56.560
<v Speaker 1>it into digestible terms, that can create more pessimism in

0:50:56.600 --> 0:50:59.200
<v Speaker 1>our lives. And so I think of Mary and Twopy

0:50:59.360 --> 0:51:03.040
<v Speaker 1>as not even an optimist, but as someone who's trying

0:51:03.080 --> 0:51:08.359
<v Speaker 1>to bring real information that does show the good, the

0:51:08.400 --> 0:51:12.640
<v Speaker 1>realistic good that's happening in our country, around the world,

0:51:13.200 --> 0:51:16.560
<v Speaker 1>to he's reporting on it so that we can see

0:51:16.560 --> 0:51:19.160
<v Speaker 1>the reality of the world we're living in more clearly.

0:51:19.840 --> 0:51:23.200
<v Speaker 1>And I guess my big takeaway, I mean, what gosh,

0:51:23.239 --> 0:51:25.279
<v Speaker 1>what better message than what he was saying at the end.

0:51:25.560 --> 0:51:28.440
<v Speaker 1>It makes me think of Charlie Munger when he said

0:51:29.000 --> 0:51:31.360
<v Speaker 1>former Warren Buffett partner. He said, the world is not

0:51:31.480 --> 0:51:34.200
<v Speaker 1>driven by greed, it's driven by envy. And he said

0:51:34.239 --> 0:51:36.799
<v Speaker 1>someone will always be doing better than you. This is

0:51:36.840 --> 0:51:40.879
<v Speaker 1>not a tragedy. And Marian was talking about comparing our

0:51:40.920 --> 0:51:45.360
<v Speaker 1>lives to the ideal and how we're bound to be

0:51:45.520 --> 0:51:49.720
<v Speaker 1>even despite all the progress we make individually, we're bound

0:51:50.120 --> 0:51:55.560
<v Speaker 1>to be not terribly happy if we're constantly comparing ourselves

0:51:55.680 --> 0:51:57.759
<v Speaker 1>to the people around us, or to the ideal life

0:51:57.760 --> 0:51:59.920
<v Speaker 1>we want to have that we don't have right now.

0:52:00.480 --> 0:52:03.800
<v Speaker 1>And he said, stop worrying too much and enjoy life.

0:52:04.320 --> 0:52:08.800
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a really good way to end this episode, where,

0:52:09.480 --> 0:52:13.160
<v Speaker 1>especially this week of Thanksgiving, remember how much we have

0:52:13.200 --> 0:52:17.799
<v Speaker 1>to be thankful for individually, just the non monetary aspects

0:52:17.920 --> 0:52:20.760
<v Speaker 1>of our lives. I know I'll be giving thanks for

0:52:20.960 --> 0:52:24.800
<v Speaker 1>so many things that have nothing to do with money,

0:52:24.880 --> 0:52:27.440
<v Speaker 1>but the fact that I have more time in my

0:52:27.520 --> 0:52:32.359
<v Speaker 1>life because of the abundance that is available to us

0:52:32.960 --> 0:52:37.000
<v Speaker 1>because what he calls superabundance, right, because of all the

0:52:37.040 --> 0:52:42.400
<v Speaker 1>progress that's been made over many decades, a couple of centuries. Really.

0:52:42.920 --> 0:52:47.360
<v Speaker 1>Then this leads to my Thanksgiving meal costing less so

0:52:47.360 --> 0:52:49.879
<v Speaker 1>that I can enjoy work less and enjoy more time

0:52:49.920 --> 0:52:52.399
<v Speaker 1>with my family. So I hope you're able to have

0:52:53.120 --> 0:52:56.839
<v Speaker 1>a wonderful Thanksgiving with people that you love. And I

0:52:56.840 --> 0:52:59.920
<v Speaker 1>hope this episode was helpful to you in terms of

0:53:00.520 --> 0:53:03.000
<v Speaker 1>how you perceive the world around you. Let's go out

0:53:03.080 --> 0:53:06.239
<v Speaker 1>and be super grateful this week. All right, that's going

0:53:06.280 --> 0:53:08.839
<v Speaker 1>to do it for this episode. Until next time, Best

0:53:08.840 --> 0:53:09.319
<v Speaker 1>Friend Out.