WEBVTT - Help, My ETF Got Hijacked by an Internet Flash Mob

0:00:06.200 --> 0:00:08.440
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Trillions. I'm Joel Webber and I'm Eric bel

0:00:08.520 --> 0:00:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Tunis Eric. The past weekend change has been a pretty

0:00:16.280 --> 0:00:18.680
<v Speaker 1>interesting one in the market, to say the least. Uh,

0:00:18.840 --> 0:00:22.640
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about Reddit, game Stop Silver, don't forget a

0:00:22.800 --> 0:00:27.040
<v Speaker 1>m C the movie Theater. Yeah, totally it was. You know,

0:00:27.320 --> 0:00:31.880
<v Speaker 1>we've been watching all year how commission free trading plus

0:00:31.880 --> 0:00:35.280
<v Speaker 1>a lockdown plus the FED, which has helped stocks just

0:00:35.320 --> 0:00:38.960
<v Speaker 1>go up relentlessly, has created this sort of perfect storm

0:00:38.960 --> 0:00:41.199
<v Speaker 1>where you've got all these retail traders and then you

0:00:41.240 --> 0:00:47.040
<v Speaker 1>throw in stemmy checks and and yeah, and it's just

0:00:47.120 --> 0:00:50.440
<v Speaker 1>getting crazy. It's like a big gambling casino. And what

0:00:50.560 --> 0:00:53.560
<v Speaker 1>happened this week, in my opinion, is that overall trend

0:00:54.280 --> 0:00:57.240
<v Speaker 1>had like a strain that took a more angry approach,

0:00:57.280 --> 0:00:59.360
<v Speaker 1>which is, hey, let's let's use this to get back

0:00:59.400 --> 0:01:02.040
<v Speaker 1>at Wall Street. And I'll tell you I've never been

0:01:02.080 --> 0:01:05.120
<v Speaker 1>called suits so many times, um as I was last

0:01:05.120 --> 0:01:07.600
<v Speaker 1>week on Twitter and I started to get offended, but

0:01:07.600 --> 0:01:09.759
<v Speaker 1>then I realized my profile picture I'm wearing a suit,

0:01:09.920 --> 0:01:13.360
<v Speaker 1>so I couldn't really complain. But that's who the Reddit

0:01:13.440 --> 0:01:15.800
<v Speaker 1>people are trying to get back at, the suits. Who

0:01:15.840 --> 0:01:18.679
<v Speaker 1>they you know obviously Wall Street hedge funds, and it

0:01:18.720 --> 0:01:22.440
<v Speaker 1>became this fascinating national news story, and to help us

0:01:22.920 --> 0:01:25.160
<v Speaker 1>walk through how e t f s fit into it,

0:01:25.200 --> 0:01:28.760
<v Speaker 1>we brought in a couple other non suits Katherine Greifield

0:01:29.080 --> 0:01:32.600
<v Speaker 1>and Claire Valentine of Bloomberg News Um were their reporters

0:01:32.600 --> 0:01:34.600
<v Speaker 1>on e t f s and we're gonna talk to

0:01:34.640 --> 0:01:37.120
<v Speaker 1>them about what they witnessed and what it all meant

0:01:43.720 --> 0:01:47.560
<v Speaker 1>this time on Trillions. Help my e t f got hijacked,

0:01:50.680 --> 0:01:54.480
<v Speaker 1>Katie Claire, Welcome to Trillions. Thanks for having us, Yes,

0:01:54.560 --> 0:01:57.480
<v Speaker 1>thank you. Okay, I have to ask how did e

0:01:57.640 --> 0:02:01.200
<v Speaker 1>t f s figure into the the game Stop rebellion

0:02:01.240 --> 0:02:05.720
<v Speaker 1>because obviously game Stop the stock was a major target,

0:02:05.720 --> 0:02:07.800
<v Speaker 1>and all of this on on Robin Hood E t

0:02:08.000 --> 0:02:10.639
<v Speaker 1>f s, though not, didn't seem as obvious at least

0:02:10.639 --> 0:02:13.399
<v Speaker 1>at the beginning. Clear. Yeah, I thought it was interesting

0:02:13.440 --> 0:02:15.640
<v Speaker 1>because I spent a lot of time on Reddit this

0:02:15.680 --> 0:02:18.720
<v Speaker 1>week and just looking at the chat rooms and things

0:02:18.760 --> 0:02:21.120
<v Speaker 1>like that. No one's talking about e t f s.

0:02:21.160 --> 0:02:23.799
<v Speaker 1>They they want to really pump up game Stop. It's

0:02:23.840 --> 0:02:27.520
<v Speaker 1>these individual stocks, as we've seen retail investors really be

0:02:27.600 --> 0:02:31.000
<v Speaker 1>interested in. But yet, you know, game Stop is part

0:02:31.040 --> 0:02:33.600
<v Speaker 1>of E t F, so it undoubtedly had an impact

0:02:33.680 --> 0:02:36.920
<v Speaker 1>on it. And what was most striking, at least initially,

0:02:37.120 --> 0:02:41.320
<v Speaker 1>is just how game stops um price increase caused it

0:02:41.360 --> 0:02:43.440
<v Speaker 1>to have an oversized waiting and a lot of these

0:02:43.440 --> 0:02:46.120
<v Speaker 1>e t F s and what e t F s

0:02:46.480 --> 0:02:49.399
<v Speaker 1>were of particular interest Katie. Yeah, I was gonna say

0:02:49.400 --> 0:02:51.240
<v Speaker 1>it took a while to find an e t F angle,

0:02:51.320 --> 0:02:56.240
<v Speaker 1>but one emerged in the Spider SMP retail et F.

0:02:56.600 --> 0:03:00.560
<v Speaker 1>That's ticker x RT, and I mean it wasn't x RT.

0:03:00.720 --> 0:03:03.799
<v Speaker 1>You also saw it in Gamer the g A m

0:03:04.040 --> 0:03:08.560
<v Speaker 1>R and also r w J, but it's felt particularly dramatic.

0:03:08.600 --> 0:03:11.480
<v Speaker 1>And x RT, I mean game stops wait. This is

0:03:11.520 --> 0:03:13.840
<v Speaker 1>an equal weight E t F for it's supposed to be,

0:03:14.200 --> 0:03:17.480
<v Speaker 1>but game stops waiting surged as high as twenty per cent,

0:03:17.880 --> 0:03:21.360
<v Speaker 1>which felt super dramatic, and you actually saw the fund's

0:03:21.400 --> 0:03:25.800
<v Speaker 1>biggest single day outflow ever as people tried to I mean,

0:03:25.840 --> 0:03:28.639
<v Speaker 1>there's multiple theories. I spoke to Eric about it too

0:03:28.639 --> 0:03:30.600
<v Speaker 1>as I was trying to figure it out. There's multiple

0:03:30.639 --> 0:03:33.280
<v Speaker 1>theories as to why that happens. Uh. It could have

0:03:33.360 --> 0:03:34.760
<v Speaker 1>to do with the fact that people were just so

0:03:34.840 --> 0:03:37.840
<v Speaker 1>desperate to get ahold of game Stop shares, or simply

0:03:37.840 --> 0:03:41.000
<v Speaker 1>that the people who allocated to x RT for you know,

0:03:41.120 --> 0:03:44.600
<v Speaker 1>core retail sector exposure were like, I didn't set up

0:03:44.600 --> 0:03:47.360
<v Speaker 1>for this. I'm getting out. But it did shake up

0:03:47.400 --> 0:03:50.680
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of passive index tracking e t f s eventually,

0:03:50.720 --> 0:03:54.080
<v Speaker 1>which was super interesting. A couple of notes on this

0:03:54.160 --> 0:03:57.080
<v Speaker 1>was gamer the video game et F. There's like four

0:03:57.120 --> 0:03:59.320
<v Speaker 1>of them, but only one held Game Stop, and that's

0:03:59.400 --> 0:04:02.000
<v Speaker 1>g A MR. And at one point that e t

0:04:02.160 --> 0:04:04.800
<v Speaker 1>F was up like eighteen percent just on game stock alone.

0:04:04.800 --> 0:04:07.920
<v Speaker 1>The others were down and then it Now that's reversed obviously,

0:04:08.320 --> 0:04:10.560
<v Speaker 1>but at one point I think Game Stop was a

0:04:10.600 --> 0:04:13.800
<v Speaker 1>thirty two or thirty three percent waiting, and I believe

0:04:13.880 --> 0:04:15.600
<v Speaker 1>that at the time, for like I don't know, a

0:04:15.640 --> 0:04:18.240
<v Speaker 1>couple hours there, it was the biggest weight in any

0:04:18.279 --> 0:04:21.440
<v Speaker 1>e t F in the world. Um at thirty something percent.

0:04:21.520 --> 0:04:24.520
<v Speaker 1>You just don't see that. Um. The one that it

0:04:24.560 --> 0:04:26.880
<v Speaker 1>beat I think was an Argentina. Argentina et F for

0:04:27.040 --> 0:04:29.160
<v Speaker 1>like one stock there like runs the whole country, and

0:04:29.440 --> 0:04:31.440
<v Speaker 1>so it's more it makes sense they're not in a

0:04:31.520 --> 0:04:33.920
<v Speaker 1>video game et F, but then in like big ones

0:04:33.960 --> 0:04:36.719
<v Speaker 1>like v t I where you have, like most of

0:04:36.760 --> 0:04:40.000
<v Speaker 1>America is in these big broad market ones. I looked

0:04:40.040 --> 0:04:43.039
<v Speaker 1>at the performance and game Stop is a point two

0:04:43.040 --> 0:04:48.360
<v Speaker 1>percent waiting and it and it contributed point four percent

0:04:48.680 --> 0:04:51.840
<v Speaker 1>of the return that week, so you barely felt it.

0:04:51.880 --> 0:04:56.279
<v Speaker 1>Although there's indirect consequences as game Stop became as the

0:04:56.320 --> 0:04:58.960
<v Speaker 1>better game Stop did the worst the market did, So

0:04:59.000 --> 0:05:02.560
<v Speaker 1>you could argue that there is an indirect consequence on

0:05:02.760 --> 0:05:07.320
<v Speaker 1>the bigger whole of mainstream broad indexes. But inside the

0:05:07.360 --> 0:05:09.719
<v Speaker 1>index games that meant nothing outside of a couple of

0:05:09.720 --> 0:05:12.720
<v Speaker 1>these sort of more niche plays that we just discussed

0:05:12.880 --> 0:05:15.279
<v Speaker 1>Katie brought up. But but I think that that's a

0:05:15.360 --> 0:05:17.680
<v Speaker 1>significant thing for us to spend a little bit more

0:05:17.720 --> 0:05:19.599
<v Speaker 1>time on, because we we do talk a lot about

0:05:19.640 --> 0:05:23.240
<v Speaker 1>thematic e t F s here on trillions um and

0:05:23.320 --> 0:05:25.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, take your pick of the ones that we've

0:05:25.000 --> 0:05:27.920
<v Speaker 1>talked about, so even video games. Right, So all of

0:05:27.960 --> 0:05:31.440
<v Speaker 1>a sudden, a video game e t F gets hijacked

0:05:31.560 --> 0:05:34.440
<v Speaker 1>by something that's that most people might not even think

0:05:34.520 --> 0:05:37.640
<v Speaker 1>was in the in the e t F. How significant

0:05:37.880 --> 0:05:41.080
<v Speaker 1>is that? I mean to see something go from you know,

0:05:41.440 --> 0:05:45.039
<v Speaker 1>uh An also ran in the index to something of

0:05:45.040 --> 0:05:46.800
<v Speaker 1>an e t F is that really supposed to happen

0:05:46.839 --> 0:05:50.320
<v Speaker 1>that way? So what I think is interesting in this

0:05:50.440 --> 0:05:53.280
<v Speaker 1>is that, uh, you know, I I spoke to State

0:05:53.360 --> 0:05:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Street about s RT in particular, was like, what what

0:05:56.120 --> 0:05:58.760
<v Speaker 1>are you gonna do? It's a it's a passive fund.

0:05:58.839 --> 0:06:02.120
<v Speaker 1>It rebalances court of A is there any scenario in

0:06:02.160 --> 0:06:05.000
<v Speaker 1>which you would rebalance early? And the answer was no.

0:06:05.600 --> 0:06:09.160
<v Speaker 1>So basically until March, it's it feels like x RT

0:06:09.279 --> 0:06:11.680
<v Speaker 1>and these other funds that rebalance on a schedule or

0:06:11.760 --> 0:06:15.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of held hostage to game stops swings. I mean

0:06:15.560 --> 0:06:18.359
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned that it was as high as twenty percent,

0:06:18.440 --> 0:06:20.440
<v Speaker 1>and x ART Eric mentioned it was as high as

0:06:20.480 --> 0:06:24.080
<v Speaker 1>thirty percent, and gamer and now in x RT it's

0:06:24.120 --> 0:06:27.320
<v Speaker 1>down to six percent, which is still a very sizeable

0:06:27.440 --> 0:06:30.120
<v Speaker 1>waiting when you consider that it should be closer to

0:06:30.200 --> 0:06:33.160
<v Speaker 1>one percent. You know, again, this is an equal weight

0:06:33.200 --> 0:06:37.320
<v Speaker 1>at e t F that holds securities. But until March

0:06:37.400 --> 0:06:41.159
<v Speaker 1>it's really just again held hostage to the whims of

0:06:41.200 --> 0:06:43.720
<v Speaker 1>game stop And I guess read it to some extent,

0:06:44.839 --> 0:06:47.200
<v Speaker 1>and let me jump in here on the fact this

0:06:47.279 --> 0:06:49.360
<v Speaker 1>is I find this fascinating. If you look at the

0:06:49.360 --> 0:06:52.040
<v Speaker 1>e t s that hold game stop and have the

0:06:52.040 --> 0:06:53.920
<v Speaker 1>biggest allocation. One of them shows up in the top

0:06:53.960 --> 0:06:58.039
<v Speaker 1>twenties the micro CAPYTF. And this is fascinating because game

0:06:58.080 --> 0:07:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Stop we went from like basic small micro to large

0:07:01.960 --> 0:07:04.280
<v Speaker 1>cap and a big large cap. I think at one

0:07:04.279 --> 0:07:07.359
<v Speaker 1>point it was the three biggest company or in the ballpark.

0:07:08.160 --> 0:07:11.880
<v Speaker 1>I've never seen that. I mean, that's unprecedented that here

0:07:11.920 --> 0:07:15.520
<v Speaker 1>you have like the two seventy biggest stock and it's

0:07:15.560 --> 0:07:18.840
<v Speaker 1>in a microcap BTF. That so, I think it spoke

0:07:18.880 --> 0:07:21.480
<v Speaker 1>to the quickness of the rise and the idea that

0:07:21.560 --> 0:07:25.000
<v Speaker 1>the herd could lift the stock that quickly. And that's

0:07:25.040 --> 0:07:28.120
<v Speaker 1>what got national news I think is just how fast

0:07:28.200 --> 0:07:30.680
<v Speaker 1>and how quick and how intense it happened. I mean

0:07:30.720 --> 0:07:34.600
<v Speaker 1>game Stop one day traded more than Tesla and nothing

0:07:34.680 --> 0:07:37.160
<v Speaker 1>trades more than Tesla, and all week it traded over

0:07:37.200 --> 0:07:40.119
<v Speaker 1>a hundred billion. That is it's now all falling apart

0:07:40.240 --> 0:07:43.840
<v Speaker 1>and it's petering out. But it was I don't know,

0:07:43.880 --> 0:07:46.240
<v Speaker 1>like breath it was. I was breathless and my mind

0:07:46.320 --> 0:07:49.000
<v Speaker 1>was blown all week, I gotta be honest. Plus the

0:07:49.080 --> 0:07:51.200
<v Speaker 1>narrative of the little guy in the hedge fund, I mean,

0:07:51.240 --> 0:07:53.120
<v Speaker 1>it was just there was so much going on all

0:07:53.160 --> 0:07:56.640
<v Speaker 1>these different people from um, you know, celebrities were coming

0:07:56.680 --> 0:07:58.880
<v Speaker 1>in and weighing in on it. I mean, it was wild,

0:07:59.480 --> 0:08:02.480
<v Speaker 1>but again we're not We've never seen anything like that.

0:08:02.920 --> 0:08:06.760
<v Speaker 1>And it also raises just questions about, especially with e

0:08:06.840 --> 0:08:10.160
<v Speaker 1>t f s, of like these unintended consequences of a

0:08:10.160 --> 0:08:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Reddit phenomenon that's suddenly hijacks something that's maybe not supposed

0:08:14.960 --> 0:08:18.440
<v Speaker 1>to get hijacked. Clear, how have you been making sense

0:08:18.440 --> 0:08:21.280
<v Speaker 1>of that? I mean, the main takeaway for me this

0:08:21.320 --> 0:08:24.160
<v Speaker 1>week was just how weird it was. And that's everyone

0:08:24.160 --> 0:08:27.400
<v Speaker 1>that I talked to, regular fund managers were just so

0:08:27.560 --> 0:08:30.000
<v Speaker 1>baffled by this. And I think Eric kind of really

0:08:30.120 --> 0:08:32.400
<v Speaker 1>I loved his title of a note that he had

0:08:32.440 --> 0:08:35.160
<v Speaker 1>and it said Wall Street Bets is hijacking some e

0:08:35.280 --> 0:08:37.680
<v Speaker 1>t f s, but they can handle it. And I

0:08:37.720 --> 0:08:39.360
<v Speaker 1>think to me that sort of the takeaway. You know,

0:08:39.400 --> 0:08:42.959
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing game stops price come down. Now, these funds

0:08:42.960 --> 0:08:45.200
<v Speaker 1>can handle it. You know, x RT is going to

0:08:45.240 --> 0:08:47.840
<v Speaker 1>be fine. But along the way, it's really weird and

0:08:47.880 --> 0:08:50.959
<v Speaker 1>it's really throwing investors I'm sure for a loop who

0:08:50.960 --> 0:08:53.040
<v Speaker 1>have invested in some of these e t f s

0:08:53.080 --> 0:08:55.120
<v Speaker 1>thinking they're were getting one thing and now they're getting

0:08:55.120 --> 0:08:57.560
<v Speaker 1>another the Joel. Let me push back on that a

0:08:57.559 --> 0:09:00.520
<v Speaker 1>little bit, because one of the worries E t S

0:09:00.640 --> 0:09:04.400
<v Speaker 1>was that they were going to actually kill any movement

0:09:04.440 --> 0:09:07.080
<v Speaker 1>in stocks because it just this big blob that owned

0:09:07.120 --> 0:09:09.280
<v Speaker 1>everything and nothing could ever move or there would be

0:09:09.320 --> 0:09:12.679
<v Speaker 1>no price discovery. Um. I think this shows that the

0:09:12.720 --> 0:09:15.880
<v Speaker 1>e t F is in the backseat and active is

0:09:15.920 --> 0:09:18.320
<v Speaker 1>in control, and I would think that would be reassuring.

0:09:18.800 --> 0:09:21.600
<v Speaker 1>The problem is the driver in this case was out

0:09:21.600 --> 0:09:24.160
<v Speaker 1>of their mind, and I think that's the new question

0:09:24.280 --> 0:09:27.400
<v Speaker 1>is what if the driver is crazy? But that's I

0:09:27.440 --> 0:09:31.040
<v Speaker 1>think would be would maybe satiate some of those concerns

0:09:31.040 --> 0:09:32.960
<v Speaker 1>that the E t F the tailwagon the dog. Clearly,

0:09:33.520 --> 0:09:35.640
<v Speaker 1>if that were the case, then this wouldn't have happened

0:09:35.679 --> 0:09:38.360
<v Speaker 1>because some of those E t f s would have been,

0:09:38.400 --> 0:09:40.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, the passive blob would have been too much

0:09:40.280 --> 0:09:48.800
<v Speaker 1>for this to happen. But it clearly wasn't. Another takeaway.

0:09:48.800 --> 0:09:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Another a story that we're watching is the relationship with ARC.

0:09:53.040 --> 0:09:55.360
<v Speaker 1>Ten days ago on a Saturday, I remember tweeting out

0:09:55.360 --> 0:09:58.959
<v Speaker 1>that there are people selling ARC merchandise. That's how red

0:09:59.040 --> 0:10:02.199
<v Speaker 1>hot ARC was and then it just boom, game stop.

0:10:02.320 --> 0:10:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Came along. Claire had a very time capsulely headline that

0:10:05.600 --> 0:10:09.240
<v Speaker 1>said something like game stop so big, nobody's thinking about

0:10:09.280 --> 0:10:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Cathy Wood right now, or something like that, and I thought,

0:10:11.760 --> 0:10:14.360
<v Speaker 1>what a what a crazy world we're in, and it's weird.

0:10:14.480 --> 0:10:18.480
<v Speaker 1>ARCS flows went away for a week, and then as

0:10:18.559 --> 0:10:21.960
<v Speaker 1>game stops, volume and performance stopped, you know, start coming down.

0:10:21.960 --> 0:10:24.720
<v Speaker 1>The volume petered out, the flows came back, and I'm like,

0:10:25.120 --> 0:10:28.840
<v Speaker 1>it's really interesting. Perhaps there's a battle for which object

0:10:28.840 --> 0:10:30.960
<v Speaker 1>can be shinier. I don't know, Claire, what were you

0:10:31.000 --> 0:10:32.319
<v Speaker 1>seeing with this? What do you make in this sort

0:10:32.360 --> 0:10:35.480
<v Speaker 1>of tango they're doing. Yeah, I was fascinated by kind

0:10:35.480 --> 0:10:39.880
<v Speaker 1>of that inverse um between arc and game Stop, and

0:10:40.320 --> 0:10:43.480
<v Speaker 1>it highlighted to me, I mean, we knew from anecdotal evidence, um,

0:10:43.480 --> 0:10:45.200
<v Speaker 1>but it's hard to get a read on how much

0:10:45.240 --> 0:10:50.160
<v Speaker 1>of these crazes are retail driven versus institutional for funds

0:10:50.200 --> 0:10:52.800
<v Speaker 1>like ARC and you know, to me, I had talked

0:10:52.800 --> 0:10:56.480
<v Speaker 1>with fund managers professionals who were super into arc um,

0:10:56.520 --> 0:10:59.120
<v Speaker 1>but sort of this inverse and this tango highlighted to

0:10:59.160 --> 0:11:02.000
<v Speaker 1>me that there is a big portion of ARCS popularity

0:11:02.040 --> 0:11:05.360
<v Speaker 1>that is due to m retail more small time investors,

0:11:05.360 --> 0:11:07.920
<v Speaker 1>the ones who are you know, wearing ARC spreadshirts and

0:11:08.320 --> 0:11:11.360
<v Speaker 1>when they were, um, you know, sort of blindsided by

0:11:11.400 --> 0:11:15.240
<v Speaker 1>game stops rise, that distracted them or you know, caused

0:11:15.320 --> 0:11:18.920
<v Speaker 1>them to put money elsewhere, and those funds um inflows

0:11:18.920 --> 0:11:22.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, suffered as a result. Also, the other thing

0:11:22.920 --> 0:11:25.640
<v Speaker 1>about this is that, like I said, game Stop became

0:11:25.679 --> 0:11:27.480
<v Speaker 1>a bit of a vix for a minute, because if

0:11:27.480 --> 0:11:30.440
<v Speaker 1>game stock went up, the rest of the market suffered. Katie,

0:11:30.480 --> 0:11:32.520
<v Speaker 1>did you look into this all the idea that hedge

0:11:32.520 --> 0:11:37.240
<v Speaker 1>funds that were short game Stop had to sell growth

0:11:37.280 --> 0:11:40.559
<v Speaker 1>stocks to cover and was that why there was this

0:11:41.080 --> 0:11:43.600
<v Speaker 1>selling off of the market, which arguably hurt ARC because

0:11:43.600 --> 0:11:46.280
<v Speaker 1>they're long growth stocks. So this is another reason I

0:11:46.280 --> 0:11:48.680
<v Speaker 1>think ARC probably took a hit last week, or you know,

0:11:48.720 --> 0:11:53.000
<v Speaker 1>at least the their shine with their flows were diminished

0:11:53.000 --> 0:11:55.280
<v Speaker 1>a bit. Yeah. I think that's the point where this

0:11:55.440 --> 0:11:59.560
<v Speaker 1>turned from sort of a sideshow into we can't ignore this.

0:11:59.640 --> 0:12:02.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, you have the SMP, the NAZAC one hundred

0:12:02.040 --> 0:12:05.520
<v Speaker 1>are falling as well. And the theory that was raised

0:12:05.520 --> 0:12:09.280
<v Speaker 1>was that hedge funds are basically having to degross and

0:12:09.320 --> 0:12:12.800
<v Speaker 1>cut their risk exposure because they're being burned so badly

0:12:12.840 --> 0:12:15.920
<v Speaker 1>on their short bets. Goldman actually has a basket of

0:12:15.960 --> 0:12:18.480
<v Speaker 1>the most shorted stocks in the market. I think at

0:12:18.600 --> 0:12:22.320
<v Speaker 1>January was up over which is by far the best

0:12:22.360 --> 0:12:26.040
<v Speaker 1>month ever. So you have these heavily shorted stocks, and

0:12:26.040 --> 0:12:28.480
<v Speaker 1>this was exactly what Wall Street Bets was trying to do.

0:12:28.559 --> 0:12:31.040
<v Speaker 1>It was trying to engineer a short squeeze. So you

0:12:31.080 --> 0:12:34.680
<v Speaker 1>have those shots are stocks rallying like crazy, So it

0:12:34.720 --> 0:12:37.480
<v Speaker 1>makes sense that, you know, the hedge funds that were

0:12:37.520 --> 0:12:40.800
<v Speaker 1>heavily short those stocks would have to cut their positions,

0:12:40.840 --> 0:12:43.679
<v Speaker 1>and that did. We did see that bleed into the

0:12:43.720 --> 0:12:47.000
<v Speaker 1>major benchmarks, and obviously ARC was caught up in that

0:12:47.080 --> 0:12:49.960
<v Speaker 1>as well. I agree the market story was a shyde

0:12:49.960 --> 0:12:52.440
<v Speaker 1>show for a while until growth stocks started selling off.

0:12:52.440 --> 0:12:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Then it's everybody's problem and Tesla starts going down. Um.

0:12:56.640 --> 0:12:58.960
<v Speaker 1>But what was fascinating and I think, you know, if

0:12:59.000 --> 0:13:00.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm the hedge fund industry, I have to do some

0:13:01.000 --> 0:13:05.240
<v Speaker 1>I have to do some internal introspection here. They picked

0:13:05.320 --> 0:13:08.000
<v Speaker 1>hedge funds as their opponent, hedge funds that were shorting,

0:13:08.040 --> 0:13:11.200
<v Speaker 1>like these fun names that do things you love, movie theaters,

0:13:11.280 --> 0:13:14.600
<v Speaker 1>video games, And it was amazing how much of society

0:13:15.080 --> 0:13:19.520
<v Speaker 1>rallied around these Internet people just because they were against

0:13:19.520 --> 0:13:22.400
<v Speaker 1>hedge funds. When you have AOC and Ted Cruz agreeing

0:13:22.400 --> 0:13:25.960
<v Speaker 1>and uniting, that's how bad people like. That's how much

0:13:26.000 --> 0:13:29.280
<v Speaker 1>hate there is for hedge funds. I honestly they have

0:13:29.320 --> 0:13:31.080
<v Speaker 1>some image work to do, in my opinion, and Wall

0:13:31.080 --> 0:13:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Street in general, I think some people just feel like

0:13:33.080 --> 0:13:37.719
<v Speaker 1>maybe there wasn't enough balancing out after two tho eight

0:13:37.760 --> 0:13:39.480
<v Speaker 1>of some of these Wall Street firms. I think they

0:13:39.559 --> 0:13:41.640
<v Speaker 1>just hedge funds. You don't really they don't see a

0:13:41.640 --> 0:13:43.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of outreach from them. People don't know what they do,

0:13:43.559 --> 0:13:45.040
<v Speaker 1>why they do it. They just have the image. They

0:13:45.080 --> 0:13:47.880
<v Speaker 1>get stuck. But I thought that was a fascinating one,

0:13:47.920 --> 0:13:50.199
<v Speaker 1>and I don't know arguably one that I think should

0:13:50.200 --> 0:13:51.880
<v Speaker 1>be somewhat of a wake up call to the financial

0:13:51.880 --> 0:13:55.040
<v Speaker 1>industry well, and especially after the pandemic to just only

0:13:55.080 --> 0:13:57.280
<v Speaker 1>accelerated that. I mean, you saw the stock market go

0:13:57.400 --> 0:13:59.640
<v Speaker 1>up so much and yet unemployment that started Jane and

0:13:59.679 --> 0:14:01.960
<v Speaker 1>regular people are suffering. So I think I think that

0:14:02.080 --> 0:14:05.360
<v Speaker 1>just sort of exacerbated at all. I do think it's

0:14:05.360 --> 0:14:09.040
<v Speaker 1>crazy to see politicians across the aisle hopping on trying

0:14:09.040 --> 0:14:10.920
<v Speaker 1>to get a sound bite hating on hedge funds. I

0:14:10.920 --> 0:14:14.440
<v Speaker 1>think Senator Elizabeth Warren actually said that she wants to

0:14:14.480 --> 0:14:18.920
<v Speaker 1>see more day traders. It's just weird to see politicians

0:14:19.040 --> 0:14:22.840
<v Speaker 1>encouraging what is that. It's heart kind of reckless impulse

0:14:22.960 --> 0:14:25.880
<v Speaker 1>to pile into Game Stop, you know, boosted by over

0:14:25.960 --> 0:14:30.280
<v Speaker 1>sixt percent in January alone. I mean, that's going to

0:14:30.400 --> 0:14:34.040
<v Speaker 1>end painfully for a portion of people. Well. At the

0:14:34.080 --> 0:14:37.800
<v Speaker 1>same time, though, there is chatter about a transaction tax,

0:14:38.280 --> 0:14:42.640
<v Speaker 1>which could also you know, be at least a moderate

0:14:42.640 --> 0:14:45.840
<v Speaker 1>speed bump on some of this activity. Okay, so we

0:14:45.880 --> 0:14:49.120
<v Speaker 1>haven't talked about another angle in the e t F

0:14:49.240 --> 0:14:53.160
<v Speaker 1>saga that was the last week, which was exclusively an

0:14:53.160 --> 0:14:57.640
<v Speaker 1>et F story, which was silber Um s LV became

0:14:57.720 --> 0:15:00.640
<v Speaker 1>with the horde, the reddit Wall Street Bet horde moved

0:15:00.680 --> 0:15:06.560
<v Speaker 1>on too after Game Stop. Why SLV well? Silver is

0:15:06.560 --> 0:15:09.800
<v Speaker 1>an interesting case because there's a lot of sort of

0:15:09.880 --> 0:15:13.760
<v Speaker 1>dueling on Wall Street Bets about where the silver squeeze started.

0:15:14.080 --> 0:15:17.800
<v Speaker 1>It started trending on Twitter, and uh, you know, everyone

0:15:17.920 --> 0:15:19.800
<v Speaker 1>was quick to say this is Wall Street bets, and

0:15:19.840 --> 0:15:22.600
<v Speaker 1>there were a few posts on Wall Street Bets about silver.

0:15:23.000 --> 0:15:26.360
<v Speaker 1>But then you saw people say, oh my gosh, Citadel

0:15:26.440 --> 0:15:29.600
<v Speaker 1>is the sixth largest holder of SLV. We're helping the

0:15:29.680 --> 0:15:33.640
<v Speaker 1>hedge funds. This isn't Wall Street Bets. So there is

0:15:33.880 --> 0:15:38.480
<v Speaker 1>some debate as to where the short silver movement started,

0:15:39.360 --> 0:15:41.920
<v Speaker 1>and that really highlights just the whole narrative of all

0:15:41.960 --> 0:15:44.200
<v Speaker 1>this happening. It's like who knows where these sorts of

0:15:44.240 --> 0:15:46.240
<v Speaker 1>things start, but yet they do start, and they kind

0:15:46.240 --> 0:15:49.000
<v Speaker 1>of take on a life of their own. Yeah, when

0:15:49.040 --> 0:15:51.600
<v Speaker 1>I was talking about so, I camera how it came up.

0:15:51.600 --> 0:15:54.080
<v Speaker 1>But first of all, I've picked up a lot of

0:15:54.120 --> 0:15:57.920
<v Speaker 1>new Wall Street Bets followers. So now I'm getting like

0:15:58.040 --> 0:16:00.280
<v Speaker 1>information and I'm either getting helpful in from ma sure

0:16:00.600 --> 0:16:03.600
<v Speaker 1>being called a suit right and left now. But one

0:16:03.640 --> 0:16:06.760
<v Speaker 1>of them was like basically saying that. Then they had

0:16:06.760 --> 0:16:08.960
<v Speaker 1>this diagram you ever see Star Wars where they meet

0:16:09.040 --> 0:16:10.920
<v Speaker 1>to go and they look at the Death Star map

0:16:10.960 --> 0:16:13.280
<v Speaker 1>and they're like, there's this one exhaust port that's a

0:16:13.320 --> 0:16:15.040
<v Speaker 1>flaw in the Death Star, and if we can get

0:16:15.040 --> 0:16:16.640
<v Speaker 1>a shot in there, the whole thing will blow up.

0:16:17.600 --> 0:16:19.760
<v Speaker 1>That's kind of how they thought silver was there, Like

0:16:19.800 --> 0:16:22.400
<v Speaker 1>if you can just rack up the cost of silver,

0:16:22.880 --> 0:16:26.040
<v Speaker 1>all of these big banks are short silver for inflation purposes.

0:16:26.040 --> 0:16:29.520
<v Speaker 1>And whatnot, and all the dominoes will fall, the whole

0:16:29.560 --> 0:16:32.520
<v Speaker 1>structure will blow up, will get revenge for two tho eight. Finally,

0:16:33.120 --> 0:16:35.560
<v Speaker 1>it was ambitious and it was laid up by somebody

0:16:35.600 --> 0:16:37.240
<v Speaker 1>who looked like they were knowing what they were doing

0:16:37.320 --> 0:16:40.040
<v Speaker 1>with the silver market. They had a lot of information, um,

0:16:40.200 --> 0:16:42.800
<v Speaker 1>but it was just a week shot. I mean still

0:16:43.040 --> 0:16:46.840
<v Speaker 1>SLV traded seven billion. They definitely rose it about eight percent.

0:16:47.120 --> 0:16:49.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean they moved the needle. But to do what

0:16:49.320 --> 0:16:51.840
<v Speaker 1>they wanted to do, Uh, plus what the in fighting

0:16:52.240 --> 0:16:54.840
<v Speaker 1>they all had to go in because the game stop

0:16:54.960 --> 0:16:58.480
<v Speaker 1>traded about the same amount as SLV, so they were split.

0:16:58.720 --> 0:17:00.480
<v Speaker 1>And that's the thing with this move, and you kind

0:17:00.480 --> 0:17:01.880
<v Speaker 1>of have to all be in the same spot. And

0:17:01.880 --> 0:17:03.240
<v Speaker 1>that's what they were able to do with game stuff

0:17:03.240 --> 0:17:06.080
<v Speaker 1>on Wednesday last Wednesday, but they were unable to do

0:17:06.119 --> 0:17:07.960
<v Speaker 1>with silver because of what Katie said. There was some

0:17:08.040 --> 0:17:12.120
<v Speaker 1>infighting and also this is a giganic pool of money

0:17:12.160 --> 0:17:14.840
<v Speaker 1>that exists. I don't know if I think they basically

0:17:14.840 --> 0:17:16.600
<v Speaker 1>bit off more than they could chew on the silver.

0:17:17.119 --> 0:17:20.160
<v Speaker 1>On the silver situation. And and you know, the other

0:17:20.200 --> 0:17:23.800
<v Speaker 1>element here is that we go from a micro cap

0:17:24.280 --> 0:17:28.920
<v Speaker 1>stock which they inflate into something else temporarily at least

0:17:29.840 --> 0:17:33.720
<v Speaker 1>and jump over to the commodity land. And you know,

0:17:33.920 --> 0:17:36.320
<v Speaker 1>the other thing, Eric, that we've talked about with commodity

0:17:36.359 --> 0:17:38.399
<v Speaker 1>e t f s is that this stuff is, you know,

0:17:38.440 --> 0:17:42.720
<v Speaker 1>there's actually underlying hard goods that back this stuff up.

0:17:43.720 --> 0:17:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Has anybody tried to actually redeem the silver? How much

0:17:47.160 --> 0:17:49.600
<v Speaker 1>of the play was about that? I don't think you've

0:17:49.640 --> 0:17:53.600
<v Speaker 1>seen that yet. I mean, so SLV uh, it's t

0:17:53.800 --> 0:17:57.440
<v Speaker 1>plus zero, so we should be getting real time inflows

0:17:57.560 --> 0:18:00.840
<v Speaker 1>like inflows for the data we see on Wednesday should

0:18:00.880 --> 0:18:04.000
<v Speaker 1>reflect Tuesday inflows. But maybe Eric can chime in here.

0:18:04.040 --> 0:18:07.879
<v Speaker 1>I think there's some weirdness about how physical silver has

0:18:08.080 --> 0:18:11.840
<v Speaker 1>traded that it doesn't quite reflect the previous day. But

0:18:12.160 --> 0:18:15.040
<v Speaker 1>if you look at shares outstanding on SLV, it doesn't

0:18:15.080 --> 0:18:19.040
<v Speaker 1>seem that anything has been redeemed so far at this

0:18:19.080 --> 0:18:22.040
<v Speaker 1>point in time, which is interesting. But I mean, it's

0:18:22.040 --> 0:18:26.840
<v Speaker 1>seen incredible inflows, just record inflows, so I would imagine

0:18:26.840 --> 0:18:29.399
<v Speaker 1>that some of that would come out, especially now that

0:18:29.480 --> 0:18:33.920
<v Speaker 1>the squeeze silver movement seems to have Peter doubt. Yeah,

0:18:33.960 --> 0:18:37.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean SLV took in one point five. I'm doing

0:18:37.200 --> 0:18:39.760
<v Speaker 1>the math he about about three billion in three days.

0:18:40.320 --> 0:18:42.200
<v Speaker 1>That is a lot. I mean, that blows away their

0:18:42.240 --> 0:18:44.879
<v Speaker 1>record and that makes it the fifth most inflows of

0:18:44.920 --> 0:18:47.359
<v Speaker 1>any et F this year, just like that. So again

0:18:47.400 --> 0:18:50.240
<v Speaker 1>they can make a difference. But the problem is compared

0:18:50.240 --> 0:18:51.600
<v Speaker 1>to the amount of silver in the world, it's just

0:18:51.640 --> 0:18:54.080
<v Speaker 1>not that much. But the creations just mean that there's

0:18:54.080 --> 0:18:56.520
<v Speaker 1>going to be You could argue that the vault where

0:18:56.520 --> 0:18:58.679
<v Speaker 1>they keep the silver, which by the way, JP Morgan's

0:18:58.720 --> 0:19:02.000
<v Speaker 1>the custodian, some of these were like Keystone cop plans

0:19:02.000 --> 0:19:03.840
<v Speaker 1>where they just didn't quite think it all the way through.

0:19:04.480 --> 0:19:06.359
<v Speaker 1>Then there was a theory that JP Morgan was actually

0:19:06.400 --> 0:19:09.120
<v Speaker 1>very long silver and so all you're doing is helping them.

0:19:09.119 --> 0:19:10.639
<v Speaker 1>And then I'd see these people arguing with you do

0:19:10.640 --> 0:19:13.880
<v Speaker 1>with each other, like we're helping them. Stop. The whole

0:19:13.920 --> 0:19:17.440
<v Speaker 1>thing was it got game stop was more like whoa

0:19:17.920 --> 0:19:20.600
<v Speaker 1>silver was more like a funny like one was a

0:19:20.720 --> 0:19:23.359
<v Speaker 1>drama action and the next one was a comedy. I thought.

0:19:24.560 --> 0:19:26.960
<v Speaker 1>What I thought was interesting is there are questions too

0:19:27.040 --> 0:19:30.840
<v Speaker 1>about how the silver's stored in London and then how

0:19:30.880 --> 0:19:34.320
<v Speaker 1>to transport it during a lockdown, and just these wild

0:19:34.400 --> 0:19:37.840
<v Speaker 1>things that these Reddit traders are impacting. I mean, it's

0:19:37.840 --> 0:19:41.800
<v Speaker 1>just it's just so strange. How do you do how

0:19:41.840 --> 0:19:45.200
<v Speaker 1>do you transport silver during a pandemic in a lockdown?

0:19:46.280 --> 0:19:51.399
<v Speaker 1>I think I think you asked for more time. Another thing,

0:19:51.440 --> 0:19:53.920
<v Speaker 1>with these silver and gold ets that are physically back,

0:19:53.960 --> 0:19:57.320
<v Speaker 1>there's always been a sort of conspiracy wing of people

0:19:57.359 --> 0:19:59.920
<v Speaker 1>who don't believe the goals there. The silver's there. Um

0:20:00.119 --> 0:20:01.639
<v Speaker 1>that said, there's been a couple of ts that have

0:20:01.680 --> 0:20:05.960
<v Speaker 1>popped up that will let a retail investor gets the

0:20:05.960 --> 0:20:08.600
<v Speaker 1>precious metals sent to their house, and that's where some

0:20:08.680 --> 0:20:11.280
<v Speaker 1>of them wanted to go to these alternative ets, but

0:20:11.640 --> 0:20:13.439
<v Speaker 1>those don't have too much money. I mean, there's not

0:20:13.480 --> 0:20:17.560
<v Speaker 1>that many people that paranoid. Most people are fine trusting

0:20:17.640 --> 0:20:20.639
<v Speaker 1>black Rock and whoever else to store the silver in

0:20:20.640 --> 0:20:23.320
<v Speaker 1>a vault. But that's always been a concern, and that

0:20:23.400 --> 0:20:25.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of I guess came out here a little bit

0:20:25.200 --> 0:20:28.480
<v Speaker 1>with their arguing again because their goal was to try to,

0:20:28.880 --> 0:20:31.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, not let Wall Street benefit at all.

0:20:32.000 --> 0:20:34.359
<v Speaker 1>Compared to what we saw with the USO in the spring,

0:20:34.400 --> 0:20:37.040
<v Speaker 1>where you know the prospect of having oil delivered to

0:20:37.119 --> 0:20:41.600
<v Speaker 1>your house, I'd rather have silver delivered personally, no doubt,

0:20:42.600 --> 0:20:45.040
<v Speaker 1>but you know, for the record, Eric and I have

0:20:45.400 --> 0:20:48.200
<v Speaker 1>I think pitched in the in the course of doing

0:20:48.240 --> 0:20:53.280
<v Speaker 1>trillions every uh issuer in the Silver Actually, I don't

0:20:53.280 --> 0:20:55.080
<v Speaker 1>know about the Silver game. Eric, we should double back

0:20:55.119 --> 0:20:58.520
<v Speaker 1>on our on our first But in the Gold World,

0:20:59.080 --> 0:21:01.680
<v Speaker 1>we've asked everything person to take us to their vaults

0:21:01.680 --> 0:21:04.680
<v Speaker 1>so that we can see the underlying asset. Um. I

0:21:05.080 --> 0:21:07.280
<v Speaker 1>asked repeatedly for a bag to be put over my

0:21:07.359 --> 0:21:09.199
<v Speaker 1>head so that, you know, we could actually really have

0:21:09.640 --> 0:21:12.440
<v Speaker 1>the drama and they could maintain their secrecy. But so

0:21:12.480 --> 0:21:15.119
<v Speaker 1>far everyone has declined. But that remains an open invite

0:21:15.119 --> 0:21:17.480
<v Speaker 1>if if anybody wants to put a bag over my head. Yeah,

0:21:17.480 --> 0:21:19.680
<v Speaker 1>anybody listening who has access to one of those vaults,

0:21:19.720 --> 0:21:22.359
<v Speaker 1>we would love to do an episode from there. I

0:21:22.359 --> 0:21:25.720
<v Speaker 1>think Bob Pissani from CNBC actually got into the vault

0:21:25.720 --> 0:21:28.720
<v Speaker 1>one time and he held up the bar. But then

0:21:28.720 --> 0:21:31.040
<v Speaker 1>there was a message board that claimed that was all

0:21:31.080 --> 0:21:35.240
<v Speaker 1>like fake. I mean, I don't know. Look the when

0:21:35.320 --> 0:21:37.040
<v Speaker 1>when when you get into the Gold world and I've

0:21:37.040 --> 0:21:41.040
<v Speaker 1>I've dove down there many times, there's like goldbugs and

0:21:41.040 --> 0:21:43.680
<v Speaker 1>then there's truly paranoid and some of the truly paranoid,

0:21:43.720 --> 0:21:45.119
<v Speaker 1>some of the stuff they come up with is h

0:21:45.280 --> 0:21:47.359
<v Speaker 1>is fascinating. That's why you know. There was an E

0:21:47.440 --> 0:21:49.960
<v Speaker 1>t F that came out. I think it changed strategies,

0:21:50.000 --> 0:21:53.960
<v Speaker 1>but it stored the gold in Switzerland. That was its

0:21:53.960 --> 0:21:56.480
<v Speaker 1>only difference. Everything else is the same as j LD,

0:21:56.600 --> 0:21:58.320
<v Speaker 1>but it stored it in Switzerland, and it had a

0:21:58.359 --> 0:22:00.639
<v Speaker 1>It got a billion dollars just for that one feature.

0:22:01.119 --> 0:22:03.359
<v Speaker 1>That's how much people are you know, I guess assume

0:22:03.440 --> 0:22:06.399
<v Speaker 1>that the West may confiscate your gold. Just on the

0:22:06.440 --> 0:22:09.879
<v Speaker 1>gold angle. I just want to quickly add when Gold

0:22:10.080 --> 0:22:12.320
<v Speaker 1>g l D particularly was like at the height of

0:22:12.359 --> 0:22:15.840
<v Speaker 1>its inflows in May, I spoke to George milling Stanley,

0:22:15.880 --> 0:22:18.600
<v Speaker 1>who's now the chief gold strategist at Streight State Street

0:22:18.600 --> 0:22:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Global Advisors, but while he was with the World Gold

0:22:21.520 --> 0:22:23.920
<v Speaker 1>Council he helped create the fun back in two thousand four,

0:22:24.480 --> 0:22:27.440
<v Speaker 1>And I mean I was interviewing him about gold, but

0:22:27.480 --> 0:22:30.479
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't get off the gold vault theme. And he

0:22:30.560 --> 0:22:33.359
<v Speaker 1>was telling me obviously he's been in the vault, and

0:22:33.720 --> 0:22:35.840
<v Speaker 1>I was like, how do you fit all the gold

0:22:35.880 --> 0:22:38.239
<v Speaker 1>in the vault? That's crazy? He was like, what are

0:22:38.240 --> 0:22:40.159
<v Speaker 1>you talking about. It's a gold bar. It takes up

0:22:40.200 --> 0:22:43.320
<v Speaker 1>like one corner. Like even fifty two billion dollars worth

0:22:43.320 --> 0:22:46.160
<v Speaker 1>of gold bars only take up a corner of the vault.

0:22:46.240 --> 0:22:48.280
<v Speaker 1>So I'm dying to see it one day. If you

0:22:48.320 --> 0:22:51.959
<v Speaker 1>guys ever get into it, I think it would be

0:22:51.960 --> 0:22:55.879
<v Speaker 1>pretty underwhelming. Yeah, I mean, isn't there that isn't there

0:22:55.920 --> 0:22:58.400
<v Speaker 1>that stat that like all the gold above ground would

0:22:58.440 --> 0:23:01.840
<v Speaker 1>fit into a swing pool or a couple of lin pools. Yeah,

0:23:01.920 --> 0:23:04.200
<v Speaker 1>this is just you're just like reading off reddit right now.

0:23:14.960 --> 0:23:20.840
<v Speaker 1>So what other causes of concern did you guys witness

0:23:21.640 --> 0:23:23.359
<v Speaker 1>in all of this as it relates to E T

0:23:23.520 --> 0:23:28.199
<v Speaker 1>F or markets in general. I mean, Katie and I

0:23:28.240 --> 0:23:31.240
<v Speaker 1>worked together on an article um that came out over

0:23:31.240 --> 0:23:35.080
<v Speaker 1>the weekend, and it looked at sort of the craze Um.

0:23:35.119 --> 0:23:37.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's the angle that Eric was talking about

0:23:37.680 --> 0:23:39.719
<v Speaker 1>how these people are mad at Wall Street, and then

0:23:39.720 --> 0:23:43.000
<v Speaker 1>there's sort of another aspect possibly about this sort of

0:23:43.040 --> 0:23:47.080
<v Speaker 1>gambling mindset and how people are bored at home. They're

0:23:47.119 --> 0:23:49.560
<v Speaker 1>looking for a sense of community. Um, they want to

0:23:49.640 --> 0:23:53.200
<v Speaker 1>feel something, and so they're sort of gaining that through

0:23:53.560 --> 0:23:57.040
<v Speaker 1>this gambling mentality, and you know that could end up

0:23:57.080 --> 0:24:00.000
<v Speaker 1>really badly for a lot of people. Yeah, It's weird

0:24:00.160 --> 0:24:05.600
<v Speaker 1>to see this movement as being compared to in virtual

0:24:05.720 --> 0:24:09.840
<v Speaker 1>occupy Wall Street. You know, the David and Goliath theme. Uh,

0:24:10.160 --> 0:24:13.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, I've seen that bandied about many times. Um,

0:24:13.720 --> 0:24:16.960
<v Speaker 1>And I mean there's obviously an element of truth there, uh,

0:24:17.000 --> 0:24:18.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, the big guy or the little guys trying

0:24:18.840 --> 0:24:21.200
<v Speaker 1>to take on the hedge funds. But I think like

0:24:21.280 --> 0:24:23.479
<v Speaker 1>in that search for a deeper meaning, it kind of

0:24:23.480 --> 0:24:26.680
<v Speaker 1>obscures that this is just fun. You know, people are

0:24:27.119 --> 0:24:30.800
<v Speaker 1>using this as entertainment. We saw this in penny Stocks,

0:24:30.840 --> 0:24:34.080
<v Speaker 1>people punting around penny stocks, and you know, like Claire

0:24:34.119 --> 0:24:36.560
<v Speaker 1>was saying, that's what our article got at, that this

0:24:36.640 --> 0:24:40.320
<v Speaker 1>is at its root, this is gambling, and that wasn't

0:24:40.359 --> 0:24:43.880
<v Speaker 1>too well received online. One guy actually made a forty

0:24:43.960 --> 0:24:46.879
<v Speaker 1>minute YouTube video about it, which was interesting. But I

0:24:46.880 --> 0:24:50.520
<v Speaker 1>think that's an important point here that there's risks here

0:24:50.680 --> 0:24:54.960
<v Speaker 1>inherent in any gambling situation. Well, and it's not always

0:24:54.960 --> 0:24:56.680
<v Speaker 1>a bad thing, you know, So what if some people

0:24:56.720 --> 0:25:00.560
<v Speaker 1>want to, you know, gamble on stocks. I mean, you great,

0:25:00.440 --> 0:25:02.360
<v Speaker 1>it does sound kind of fun. I mean I spent

0:25:02.359 --> 0:25:04.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of time on Reddit this week, and some

0:25:04.440 --> 0:25:07.600
<v Speaker 1>of it's kind of you know, it seems like fun. Yeah,

0:25:08.320 --> 0:25:10.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm in that camp too. I don't judge, And I

0:25:10.920 --> 0:25:13.440
<v Speaker 1>think that this is also just the product of a

0:25:13.480 --> 0:25:15.960
<v Speaker 1>late cyclable market. Again, this just goes back to the

0:25:15.960 --> 0:25:19.560
<v Speaker 1>whole theme of the TikTok videos and the Robin hood

0:25:19.600 --> 0:25:21.760
<v Speaker 1>and everything going up. It's a nice time to gamble

0:25:22.040 --> 0:25:25.680
<v Speaker 1>when the stock market's got this nice bullish base. Um.

0:25:25.760 --> 0:25:28.400
<v Speaker 1>So my theory is most of these people will learn

0:25:28.440 --> 0:25:30.560
<v Speaker 1>the hard way that they gotta you know, buy and

0:25:30.640 --> 0:25:33.600
<v Speaker 1>hold and do something a little more thoughtful after a correction.

0:25:34.280 --> 0:25:36.000
<v Speaker 1>I went back and look at articles from the like,

0:25:38.160 --> 0:25:40.080
<v Speaker 1>and there was a lot of these quote mobs that

0:25:40.160 --> 0:25:43.080
<v Speaker 1>were all, you know, they just were using different forms,

0:25:43.119 --> 0:25:45.439
<v Speaker 1>but they were making tons of money in the market,

0:25:45.520 --> 0:25:46.879
<v Speaker 1>and then it blew up in their face and a

0:25:46.880 --> 0:25:50.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of them were this is my generation converted to passive.

0:25:50.880 --> 0:25:53.359
<v Speaker 1>And also another thing on the passive thing is, you know,

0:25:53.440 --> 0:25:55.119
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of people who are watching this

0:25:55.240 --> 0:25:58.320
<v Speaker 1>and I put myself in that boat, we think, like,

0:25:58.680 --> 0:26:00.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you're a passive investor and you first

0:26:00.480 --> 0:26:03.760
<v Speaker 1>subscribe the Vanguard way and whatnot, um, that is the

0:26:03.840 --> 0:26:06.040
<v Speaker 1>way to sort of get back, not get back at

0:26:06.080 --> 0:26:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street, but it keeps Wall Streets, hands off your

0:26:08.560 --> 0:26:11.480
<v Speaker 1>money for the most part, and you build wealth. So

0:26:11.720 --> 0:26:13.560
<v Speaker 1>I do think, like you know, there's a phrase in

0:26:13.600 --> 0:26:16.359
<v Speaker 1>the movie Wargames that the only winning move is to

0:26:16.440 --> 0:26:19.040
<v Speaker 1>not play, because not only are there gonna be tons

0:26:19.040 --> 0:26:20.960
<v Speaker 1>of bag holders and tears at the end of this,

0:26:21.560 --> 0:26:23.560
<v Speaker 1>but they're racking up trading costs. I mean, I did

0:26:23.560 --> 0:26:25.600
<v Speaker 1>the math, and if you look at the bit ast

0:26:25.640 --> 0:26:27.359
<v Speaker 1>spread of some of these stocks are is pretty wide.

0:26:27.680 --> 0:26:30.760
<v Speaker 1>We're looking at about, you know, five hundred million is

0:26:31.600 --> 0:26:34.919
<v Speaker 1>in trade in trading costs. Now, obviously that's as a group,

0:26:35.640 --> 0:26:39.880
<v Speaker 1>but that is is counter and productive if your goal

0:26:39.960 --> 0:26:42.239
<v Speaker 1>is to sort of starve Wall Street. So I do

0:26:42.359 --> 0:26:44.440
<v Speaker 1>think it comes back to, as Dave nade It called it,

0:26:44.520 --> 0:26:47.400
<v Speaker 1>the Vogel hack um. That's the only way I've seen

0:26:47.480 --> 0:26:50.800
<v Speaker 1>to solve this puzzle and build wealth and nobody gets

0:26:50.840 --> 0:26:53.560
<v Speaker 1>hurt um is to just buy and hold a cheap

0:26:53.560 --> 0:26:56.800
<v Speaker 1>index fun and not trade it. But I agree, it's

0:26:56.800 --> 0:26:58.440
<v Speaker 1>fun to trade, and I think if you just admit

0:26:58.480 --> 0:27:00.960
<v Speaker 1>that to yourself, I said, just in joy yourself. I

0:27:00.960 --> 0:27:03.480
<v Speaker 1>think we see a lot of portfolios being very cheap

0:27:03.880 --> 0:27:07.159
<v Speaker 1>beta in the core, and then they go crazy on

0:27:07.200 --> 0:27:11.119
<v Speaker 1>the outside with stock trading or options or arc and

0:27:11.200 --> 0:27:13.320
<v Speaker 1>that hot sauce level. If it can keep you from

0:27:13.359 --> 0:27:17.639
<v Speaker 1>like messing with great, it's actually a good behavioral tactic

0:27:17.680 --> 0:27:21.719
<v Speaker 1>as well. Okay, I have one more thing that we

0:27:21.760 --> 0:27:24.520
<v Speaker 1>want to we want to talk about and and Katie,

0:27:24.520 --> 0:27:28.119
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna troll your your Twitter Twitter feed. Here. Eric's

0:27:28.119 --> 0:27:30.520
<v Speaker 1>pulling it up so he can I like to read it.

0:27:31.880 --> 0:27:33.760
<v Speaker 1>I've tweeted a lot of dumb things this week, so

0:27:33.800 --> 0:27:38.159
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna have to scroll. Okay, here we go. This

0:27:38.240 --> 0:27:40.840
<v Speaker 1>is good because this is this is like right in

0:27:40.880 --> 0:27:43.479
<v Speaker 1>the middle of the frenzy. It's sort of like throwing

0:27:43.520 --> 0:27:47.360
<v Speaker 1>like chum in the middle of like already shark infested waters.

0:27:49.000 --> 0:27:52.080
<v Speaker 1>Here it is ready. What would the FED do if

0:27:52.080 --> 0:27:55.560
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street bets engineered a short squeeze on long term treasuries?

0:27:56.160 --> 0:28:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Good question, Yeah, I mean fifty replies is pretty good.

0:28:02.080 --> 0:28:05.000
<v Speaker 1>And then she did a quick, qualifying second treat that

0:28:05.080 --> 0:28:08.600
<v Speaker 1>just said this is a joke. And even even after

0:28:08.720 --> 0:28:11.560
<v Speaker 1>that tweet, I mean, I got so many serious, like

0:28:11.800 --> 0:28:14.359
<v Speaker 1>thought out replies, and I just I don't know what

0:28:14.440 --> 0:28:17.920
<v Speaker 1>to say, Like it's it's a joke. Someone did say that.

0:28:18.359 --> 0:28:20.639
<v Speaker 1>Isn't the FED trying to do that already. Aren't they

0:28:20.680 --> 0:28:23.320
<v Speaker 1>trying to engineer a short squeeze? Which I thought was

0:28:23.359 --> 0:28:27.239
<v Speaker 1>a pretty good reply. I saw like I saw one

0:28:27.280 --> 0:28:28.960
<v Speaker 1>of the tweets right aft the bat just said I'm

0:28:29.000 --> 0:28:31.760
<v Speaker 1>here for the ratio. That's when you know someone said

0:28:31.840 --> 0:28:35.159
<v Speaker 1>something that's just you know, outrageous and uh, people just

0:28:35.200 --> 0:28:37.960
<v Speaker 1>hanging the replies just to see everybody go wild. I

0:28:38.040 --> 0:28:41.080
<v Speaker 1>hung in there though. Let the record show, Yeah, you

0:28:41.080 --> 0:28:43.080
<v Speaker 1>didn't delete it. You hung in there. That's I give

0:28:43.120 --> 0:28:45.120
<v Speaker 1>you credit. It's tough to take that much heat on Twitter,

0:28:45.240 --> 0:28:49.320
<v Speaker 1>especially in this kind of a scenario. Katie with those

0:28:49.360 --> 0:28:53.400
<v Speaker 1>diamond hands, Katie Claire, thanks for joining us and jillions.

0:28:53.760 --> 0:29:05.280
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, thank you, Thanks for listening to Trillions until

0:29:05.320 --> 0:29:07.440
<v Speaker 1>next time. You can find us on the Bloomberg Terminal,

0:29:07.640 --> 0:29:11.880
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com, Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and wherever else you

0:29:12.000 --> 0:29:14.400
<v Speaker 1>like to listen. We'd love to hear from you. We're

0:29:14.400 --> 0:29:18.200
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter, I'm at Joel Webber Show, He's at Eric Baltunos.

0:29:18.480 --> 0:29:21.560
<v Speaker 1>You can find Katie at k Griidfeld and Claire at

0:29:21.800 --> 0:29:26.080
<v Speaker 1>CFB Underscore eighteen. This episode of Trillions was produced by

0:29:26.080 --> 0:29:29.840
<v Speaker 1>Magnus Hendrickson Francesca Levie is the head of Bloomberg podcast

0:29:30.440 --> 0:29:31.400
<v Speaker 1>Bye