WEBVTT - Beating The Book: Guessing Lines Week 7

0:00:03.440 --> 0:00:12.799
<v Speaker 1>Check it down man now down Man, Good Monday morning

0:00:12.840 --> 0:00:15.160
<v Speaker 1>to you a numbers game right here at visav Sports

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:17.759
<v Speaker 1>Betting that work Serious Extempt Channel two four, Visa dot Com,

0:00:17.800 --> 0:00:20.960
<v Speaker 1>the Visa app, Fubo Slinging Game Plus, How are you doing?

0:00:20.960 --> 0:00:24.560
<v Speaker 1>How was your weekend betting wise and otherwise? Jason conn

0:00:24.600 --> 0:00:26.480
<v Speaker 1>is here as well. How you doing, Jason Good? Good?

0:00:26.520 --> 0:00:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Good morning, Um. Guessing lines today. Guessing lines in the

0:00:30.280 --> 0:00:34.080
<v Speaker 1>National Football leg for week number seven. Wow, we're moving along.

0:00:34.520 --> 0:00:37.400
<v Speaker 1>H Plus we'll talk about baseball the Dodgers game last night.

0:00:37.720 --> 0:00:43.680
<v Speaker 1>Interesting non pitching move that wasn't mentioned during the broadcast

0:00:43.760 --> 0:00:46.120
<v Speaker 1>last night, and I'm curious what people think about that.

0:00:46.600 --> 0:00:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Uh Loma, Chenko and Lopez got to talk about the

0:00:49.680 --> 0:00:52.519
<v Speaker 1>judging there, but let us talk week seven of the

0:00:52.600 --> 0:00:54.520
<v Speaker 1>National Football League. It has always for those who are

0:00:54.520 --> 0:00:55.920
<v Speaker 1>just landing on this show for the first time on

0:00:55.920 --> 0:00:58.520
<v Speaker 1>Monday's during football season, You're like, what's this guessing line stuff?

0:00:58.920 --> 0:01:01.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm in a cocoons it's yesterday. This is a tribute

0:01:01.640 --> 0:01:04.720
<v Speaker 1>to the old Stardust radio show that Roxy Roxborough was

0:01:04.760 --> 0:01:07.440
<v Speaker 1>involved in back in the day. Chrissie Andrews comes on

0:01:07.560 --> 0:01:09.880
<v Speaker 1>tells me, after my guess what the line is that

0:01:09.920 --> 0:01:11.480
<v Speaker 1>he's going to post right after the show at the

0:01:11.480 --> 0:01:14.800
<v Speaker 1>south Point Hotel Casino, and hopefully within that exercise we

0:01:14.840 --> 0:01:18.920
<v Speaker 1>find ourselves, uh the we extract some value, I should say,

0:01:18.920 --> 0:01:21.479
<v Speaker 1>from the exercise itself. Let us bring in the star

0:01:21.560 --> 0:01:23.600
<v Speaker 1>of the show. He is the south Point Hotel Casino

0:01:23.640 --> 0:01:26.800
<v Speaker 1>sports book director my mishka Chrissie Andrews. Good morning, Chris.

0:01:28.200 --> 0:01:31.240
<v Speaker 1>What's going on flew leafing through pages? What are you

0:01:31.319 --> 0:01:37.480
<v Speaker 1>doing over there? No? I'm getting my notes. Words like it.

0:01:37.600 --> 0:01:42.080
<v Speaker 1>I like show prep. H. Let's start with let me

0:01:42.120 --> 0:01:46.480
<v Speaker 1>just real quick, uh, Survivor over at Circa Jason. Four

0:01:46.560 --> 0:01:50.200
<v Speaker 1>hundred nine people submitted supposed before ten, but I think

0:01:50.200 --> 0:01:54.760
<v Speaker 1>somebody forgot again. Four nine fifty six went out yesterday,

0:01:54.800 --> 0:01:57.840
<v Speaker 1>fifty one of which were with the Patriots. So we

0:01:57.920 --> 0:02:02.320
<v Speaker 1>are down to, by my count, three hundred fifty one, um,

0:02:02.360 --> 0:02:05.040
<v Speaker 1>with the Dolphins and Colts being the big winners yesterday

0:02:05.120 --> 0:02:09.080
<v Speaker 1>for survivors. Colts obviously put a scare into people, but

0:02:09.320 --> 0:02:12.519
<v Speaker 1>so three left heading into tonight. I don't think anybody does.

0:02:12.639 --> 0:02:15.760
<v Speaker 1>One person who has the chiefs tonight. But that's about it. Chrissy.

0:02:15.840 --> 0:02:17.760
<v Speaker 1>How was your weekend as a book here at the

0:02:17.760 --> 0:02:25.359
<v Speaker 1>South Point. Um, it was pretty incredible. Uh yeah, we're

0:02:25.360 --> 0:02:30.240
<v Speaker 1>talking like super Bowl type winds for Sunday and Saturday

0:02:30.320 --> 0:02:32.880
<v Speaker 1>was great too, pretty much one on everything. What was

0:02:32.919 --> 0:02:38.079
<v Speaker 1>your biggest winner? Our biggest winner? Oh? Probably? Oh yeah,

0:02:38.080 --> 0:02:40.320
<v Speaker 1>it had to be the Green Bay Campa game last night.

0:02:40.560 --> 0:02:43.040
<v Speaker 1>That was the biggest game, all right. That was I

0:02:43.040 --> 0:02:45.160
<v Speaker 1>went three and two in the contest three and two.

0:02:45.840 --> 0:02:48.760
<v Speaker 1>Who let me down was the Ravens, which had no

0:02:48.840 --> 0:02:52.040
<v Speaker 1>business losing that. That was just ridiculous. That's that's why

0:02:52.080 --> 0:02:54.919
<v Speaker 1>the NFL is plink oh pre flop a t s.

0:02:55.560 --> 0:02:57.120
<v Speaker 1>And then the other one that I lost on was

0:02:57.200 --> 0:02:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Caroline who let me down? That was just a bad pick.

0:02:59.400 --> 0:03:01.400
<v Speaker 1>But those are only those are the only two. So

0:03:01.520 --> 0:03:04.040
<v Speaker 1>interesting that that was the game because I had Tampa Bay,

0:03:04.240 --> 0:03:06.280
<v Speaker 1>but interesting that that was the game that was the

0:03:06.320 --> 0:03:10.799
<v Speaker 1>big winner for you. Shall we begin with Thursday Night Football, Sir,

0:03:12.680 --> 0:03:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Thursday Night Football Giants and the Eagles. Giants in the Eagles,

0:03:18.639 --> 0:03:20.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't get any better than this kind of does

0:03:20.880 --> 0:03:24.920
<v Speaker 1>Actually Giants win yesterday twenty to nineteen. Well, we're gonna

0:03:24.960 --> 0:03:29.040
<v Speaker 1>talk about coaching decisions today on this show. Let's start

0:03:29.040 --> 0:03:32.000
<v Speaker 1>with the Washington football team Giants beat the Washington football

0:03:32.040 --> 0:03:36.360
<v Speaker 1>team twenty to nineteen when Riverboat Ron Rivera elected to

0:03:36.400 --> 0:03:40.680
<v Speaker 1>go for two after the football teamers cut it to

0:03:40.760 --> 0:03:44.280
<v Speaker 1>twenty to nineteen on a Kyle Allen two Simms touchdown

0:03:44.320 --> 0:03:47.280
<v Speaker 1>pass with thirty six seconds left. So I don't know

0:03:47.280 --> 0:03:50.480
<v Speaker 1>if this is one of these situations where Riverboat Ron

0:03:50.560 --> 0:03:53.160
<v Speaker 1>felt the need to live up to his name. You know,

0:03:53.320 --> 0:03:55.920
<v Speaker 1>that's that's always something that that you wonder about. You're like,

0:03:56.000 --> 0:03:58.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, you don't have to be a riverboat every time.

0:03:58.760 --> 0:04:01.480
<v Speaker 1>But he decided we're going for the win, even though

0:04:01.560 --> 0:04:03.960
<v Speaker 1>really the only reason the Giants were up was because

0:04:04.000 --> 0:04:08.000
<v Speaker 1>of an offensive turnover on the football teams part, and

0:04:08.040 --> 0:04:09.440
<v Speaker 1>so it looked like they were in control of the game.

0:04:09.440 --> 0:04:11.360
<v Speaker 1>But yet they went for didn't get it, and so

0:04:11.720 --> 0:04:14.120
<v Speaker 1>the New York Giants off the Schneide get their first

0:04:14.120 --> 0:04:17.160
<v Speaker 1>win of the year. Daniel Jones just to illustrate how

0:04:17.680 --> 0:04:21.839
<v Speaker 1>you know Washington really had this game. Uh, probably the

0:04:21.839 --> 0:04:24.880
<v Speaker 1>advantage in this game. Daniel Jones twelve of nineteen for

0:04:25.040 --> 0:04:28.960
<v Speaker 1>one hundred twelve yards passing. He gained seventy four yards

0:04:28.960 --> 0:04:31.960
<v Speaker 1>on the ground. I don't know that I recall saying

0:04:31.960 --> 0:04:34.600
<v Speaker 1>a stat line like that too often. Two hundred and

0:04:34.640 --> 0:04:37.960
<v Speaker 1>forty total yards for the Giants in their win against Washington.

0:04:38.080 --> 0:04:40.760
<v Speaker 1>They were seven eleven on seven four eleven on third downs.

0:04:40.760 --> 0:04:43.200
<v Speaker 1>At least they did that right. And then there's Philadelphia.

0:04:43.240 --> 0:04:45.680
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned for those of us who had Baltimore against

0:04:45.680 --> 0:04:50.279
<v Speaker 1>the spread yesterday, My goodness, what a rough, rough outcome

0:04:50.360 --> 0:04:55.000
<v Speaker 1>that was. Carson Wentz was two touchdowns, note picks. He

0:04:55.080 --> 0:04:59.760
<v Speaker 1>was sacked six times, but that's his final line. He

0:04:59.760 --> 0:05:04.200
<v Speaker 1>would two of seven for three yards with under five

0:05:04.320 --> 0:05:06.719
<v Speaker 1>minutes left in the first half, two of seven for

0:05:06.800 --> 0:05:10.039
<v Speaker 1>three yards, no touchdowns, no pick, sack three times with

0:05:10.160 --> 0:05:12.320
<v Speaker 1>under five minutes left in the first half. Then seven

0:05:12.320 --> 0:05:14.520
<v Speaker 1>of fourteen for fifty four yards of a half. By

0:05:14.520 --> 0:05:17.640
<v Speaker 1>the way, it's Gill Alexander Chrissie Andrews guessing lines right

0:05:17.680 --> 0:05:20.480
<v Speaker 1>here on a numbers game at Visa the Sports betting Network.

0:05:20.720 --> 0:05:24.560
<v Speaker 1>No first downs for the Eagles on their first six

0:05:24.720 --> 0:05:27.240
<v Speaker 1>drives of the game. Miles Sanders did fill up the

0:05:27.240 --> 0:05:29.160
<v Speaker 1>box score nine of one, eighteen had that one big

0:05:29.240 --> 0:05:31.520
<v Speaker 1>run Travis Fulgum six or seventy five and a touchdown.

0:05:31.680 --> 0:05:35.159
<v Speaker 1>It's the Eagles worst start since so it's the one

0:05:35.200 --> 0:05:39.000
<v Speaker 1>in five Giants against the one four and one Eagles,

0:05:40.480 --> 0:05:42.400
<v Speaker 1>and with an Eagles win and the Cowboys lost, the

0:05:42.400 --> 0:05:51.600
<v Speaker 1>Eagles could be leading the division did points they are, Yeah, which,

0:05:51.680 --> 0:05:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Chrissy is another real reason. What you just said right

0:05:54.080 --> 0:05:57.560
<v Speaker 1>there to me is why Washington probably shouldn't go for

0:05:57.640 --> 0:06:00.640
<v Speaker 1>two there. Also, it's not like your season's over, trying

0:06:00.640 --> 0:06:04.200
<v Speaker 1>to just push it in overtime. I'll say, Philly minus

0:06:04.240 --> 0:06:09.680
<v Speaker 1>seven against the Giant, you're a little high. It's six

0:06:09.760 --> 0:06:14.520
<v Speaker 1>and a half, which my power. Actually, I'm sorry, there's

0:06:14.560 --> 0:06:17.360
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of six and almost all six, um,

0:06:17.600 --> 0:06:19.599
<v Speaker 1>which is what I'm gonna open it my power. Raidings

0:06:19.640 --> 0:06:23.919
<v Speaker 1>come to Eagles three without the home field advantage, and

0:06:23.960 --> 0:06:26.400
<v Speaker 1>I guess we're starting to see that home field is

0:06:26.440 --> 0:06:28.840
<v Speaker 1>meaning a little something. So I have no beef with

0:06:28.920 --> 0:06:31.520
<v Speaker 1>the six. But two things I want to comment on.

0:06:31.960 --> 0:06:35.119
<v Speaker 1>You know, what I didn't understand was the first time

0:06:35.200 --> 0:06:39.520
<v Speaker 1>the Eagles went for two, they're down seven, seventeen nothing,

0:06:39.520 --> 0:06:43.960
<v Speaker 1>they score, making seventeen six go for two to cut

0:06:43.960 --> 0:06:47.599
<v Speaker 1>it to nine. I didn't understand that. Uh, And it

0:06:47.640 --> 0:06:50.200
<v Speaker 1>seemed like they were then chasing that point the rest

0:06:50.200 --> 0:06:53.320
<v Speaker 1>of the way, you know, And uh, yeah, you know,

0:06:53.400 --> 0:06:56.520
<v Speaker 1>listen that I go. I know the two points, you know,

0:06:56.640 --> 0:07:00.480
<v Speaker 1>evangelicals that are out there, and uh, you know it's better.

0:07:00.839 --> 0:07:02.599
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure it's better always. And I think we

0:07:02.640 --> 0:07:05.039
<v Speaker 1>saw some examples of it yesterday the other day. I

0:07:05.080 --> 0:07:07.880
<v Speaker 1>just want to say, and I started thinking about this yesterday.

0:07:08.000 --> 0:07:10.040
<v Speaker 1>And I know I watched college football probably a lot

0:07:10.080 --> 0:07:12.960
<v Speaker 1>more than you do, but I was sinking between Daniel

0:07:13.080 --> 0:07:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Jones and Mitchell Trabinsky, you know, watching these guys. There

0:07:17.960 --> 0:07:20.680
<v Speaker 1>was never a moment when I was in, oh my god,

0:07:20.720 --> 0:07:23.400
<v Speaker 1>these guys are really going to be stars in the NFL.

0:07:24.480 --> 0:07:27.320
<v Speaker 1>I gotta go after these Yet, you know, I don't

0:07:27.320 --> 0:07:30.480
<v Speaker 1>know if they wiled them in the you know, in

0:07:30.520 --> 0:07:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Indianapolis and you know that camp and stuff. I guess

0:07:34.160 --> 0:07:37.720
<v Speaker 1>they did, but never watching them play football, were you

0:07:37.880 --> 0:07:43.240
<v Speaker 1>just blown away by their incredible talents. So I don't

0:07:43.280 --> 0:07:45.400
<v Speaker 1>know that that was my thought as I watching Jones

0:07:45.520 --> 0:07:47.640
<v Speaker 1>yesterday with regard to your bisky, I mean, I said,

0:07:47.880 --> 0:07:50.400
<v Speaker 1>I've said it a hundred times where it's like Deshaun

0:07:50.480 --> 0:07:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Watson is there on display for the entire country to see,

0:07:53.880 --> 0:07:57.040
<v Speaker 1>right and beats Alabama, the vaunted Alabama defense when their

0:07:57.080 --> 0:08:00.880
<v Speaker 1>defense was spectacular right beats them in the National Championship.

0:08:01.120 --> 0:08:03.560
<v Speaker 1>But yet you're enamored by this guy who had thirteen

0:08:03.600 --> 0:08:06.040
<v Speaker 1>starts at North Carolina. Like it's the strange, it's the

0:08:06.120 --> 0:08:08.880
<v Speaker 1>strangest thing in the world what people convince them of

0:08:09.400 --> 0:08:12.280
<v Speaker 1>themselves of. And here's Daniel Jones, a really high draft

0:08:12.280 --> 0:08:14.280
<v Speaker 1>pick for the Giants. I don't know if we're at

0:08:14.360 --> 0:08:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Donald level level yet in terms of thinking to go elsewhere,

0:08:18.600 --> 0:08:23.960
<v Speaker 1>but soon enough we will be if this continues. Yeah,

0:08:24.040 --> 0:08:26.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we're a Darnald level yet, you know,

0:08:26.880 --> 0:08:29.800
<v Speaker 1>but you know we need to see some improvement. I

0:08:29.840 --> 0:08:31.680
<v Speaker 1>can tell you that. Yeah, so six and a half

0:08:31.840 --> 0:08:36.360
<v Speaker 1>and I haven't seen any signs of it. Six six, Okay,

0:08:36.480 --> 0:08:38.960
<v Speaker 1>I haven't seen any signs either. And I'm with you.

0:08:39.160 --> 0:08:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Just to comment on your on your remark about, you know,

0:08:42.000 --> 0:08:46.240
<v Speaker 1>the Eagles going for going for two early. I just think,

0:08:46.280 --> 0:08:48.440
<v Speaker 1>and I've said this on this show before too, which is,

0:08:49.720 --> 0:08:53.360
<v Speaker 1>coaches seem with the exception of one or two of them,

0:08:53.360 --> 0:08:56.520
<v Speaker 1>which will talk about later, because they're just so leaps

0:08:56.559 --> 0:08:59.480
<v Speaker 1>and bounds above the rest of their coaching cohorts. But

0:08:59.679 --> 0:09:02.280
<v Speaker 1>most of these coaches seem to now it's it's gotten

0:09:02.280 --> 0:09:04.840
<v Speaker 1>into their brain. It's almost like they're like, okay, am

0:09:04.840 --> 0:09:06.520
<v Speaker 1>I supposed to do? What if I do? What do

0:09:06.559 --> 0:09:08.960
<v Speaker 1>I do here? I know I want to sound smart,

0:09:09.000 --> 0:09:10.480
<v Speaker 1>I want to look smart. I don't want to be,

0:09:10.880 --> 0:09:13.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, skewered in the press tomorrow. So I think

0:09:13.360 --> 0:09:14.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm supposed to go for two here. So that's what

0:09:14.920 --> 0:09:17.360
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna do. Like it just seems that arbitrary. Sometimes

0:09:17.640 --> 0:09:20.720
<v Speaker 1>it's like the black jack player was, you know, It's

0:09:20.720 --> 0:09:22.640
<v Speaker 1>like if you have the sixteen, you know how some

0:09:22.920 --> 0:09:25.080
<v Speaker 1>there are some black jack players who are like, this

0:09:25.120 --> 0:09:27.320
<v Speaker 1>time I'm gonna hit. This time, I'm gonna just you know,

0:09:27.360 --> 0:09:29.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna sit on it. It's like, at least be

0:09:29.880 --> 0:09:34.040
<v Speaker 1>consistent through, right, Like just give me that much. But

0:09:34.040 --> 0:09:36.400
<v Speaker 1>you don't see that with these coaches. They'll they'll just

0:09:36.400 --> 0:09:39.360
<v Speaker 1>sort of do what they want to on a whim. Um.

0:09:39.400 --> 0:09:41.560
<v Speaker 1>So I didn't think, yeah, I'm I didn't think that

0:09:41.559 --> 0:09:44.160
<v Speaker 1>that was necessarily the way to play it. And I

0:09:44.200 --> 0:09:46.640
<v Speaker 1>certainly didn't think Riverboat Ron should have gone for it there.

0:09:46.800 --> 0:09:49.600
<v Speaker 1>But eagles six is what you're gonna put up. I

0:09:49.679 --> 0:09:53.600
<v Speaker 1>had seven, Yeah, you know, I wouldn't want to go

0:09:53.640 --> 0:09:55.800
<v Speaker 1>too high with anything on either one of these teams.

0:09:55.840 --> 0:09:58.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, it just looks all right. I don't know,

0:09:58.559 --> 0:10:02.040
<v Speaker 1>but seven would be a out. It's Chris Andrew's at

0:10:02.080 --> 0:10:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Andrew's Sports. By the way, we rarely say your Twitter

0:10:04.360 --> 0:10:08.199
<v Speaker 1>Crizzy at Andrew's Sports, author of then one Day available

0:10:08.200 --> 0:10:11.480
<v Speaker 1>where all books are sold, including Amazon of course. How Sunday,

0:10:11.520 --> 0:10:13.680
<v Speaker 1>how many afternoon games are we doing the two afternoon

0:10:13.720 --> 0:10:17.800
<v Speaker 1>game thing again this week? Uh? To? We have three

0:10:18.160 --> 0:10:21.520
<v Speaker 1>one to three yellow three afternoon games. Jason four, Jason's

0:10:21.559 --> 0:10:24.840
<v Speaker 1>have four to so yeah, I'm sorry, Jason's right, it

0:10:24.920 --> 0:10:27.000
<v Speaker 1>is four. I missed the CRDS, all right. I like

0:10:27.120 --> 0:10:32.400
<v Speaker 1>that distribution, all right? What's first on Sunday morning? Cleveland

0:10:32.559 --> 0:10:36.599
<v Speaker 1>at Cincinnati. Cleveland at Cincinnati and FS excuse me a

0:10:36.720 --> 0:10:39.920
<v Speaker 1>f C North. Cleveland loses, and I do mean lose

0:10:40.120 --> 0:10:44.840
<v Speaker 1>badly to the Pittsburgh Steelers. Cleveland loses that game by

0:10:44.880 --> 0:10:49.680
<v Speaker 1>the score of thirty eight to seven as three point dogs.

0:10:49.720 --> 0:10:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Money came in on Cleveland as game time approach. They

0:10:52.440 --> 0:10:56.080
<v Speaker 1>lose thirty eight to seven. Baker Mayfield ten of eighteen

0:10:56.160 --> 0:11:00.000
<v Speaker 1>for one nineteen, one touchdown, two picks at four times

0:11:00.000 --> 0:11:03.040
<v Speaker 1>times he was taken out of the game for case Keenum.

0:11:03.080 --> 0:11:05.199
<v Speaker 1>In this one case Keenum was five for ten for

0:11:05.200 --> 0:11:08.040
<v Speaker 1>forty six, but the Browns were one of twelve on

0:11:08.240 --> 0:11:11.480
<v Speaker 1>third downs, they were oh for three on fourth down.

0:11:11.520 --> 0:11:14.600
<v Speaker 1>They only had two hundred twenty total yards of offense.

0:11:14.920 --> 0:11:17.240
<v Speaker 1>They were minus two in turnovers. Just a recipe for

0:11:17.320 --> 0:11:21.240
<v Speaker 1>disaster h Pittsburgh was one of mine. Yesterday, Sitton Senata

0:11:21.880 --> 0:11:24.560
<v Speaker 1>was up on the Colts twenty one to nothing. And

0:11:24.600 --> 0:11:26.400
<v Speaker 1>for those of us who have the Dolphins and Survivor,

0:11:26.520 --> 0:11:28.520
<v Speaker 1>this was a tough one to watch the Colts come

0:11:28.520 --> 0:11:30.280
<v Speaker 1>back because a lot of people have the Colts and Survivor.

0:11:30.559 --> 0:11:33.640
<v Speaker 1>Joe Burrow future Hall of Famer, twenty five thirty nine,

0:11:33.640 --> 0:11:36.120
<v Speaker 1>that's my buddy. Matt Brown calls him uh on Primetime

0:11:36.160 --> 0:11:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Action twenty five of thirty nine for three thirteen, no touchdowns,

0:11:39.080 --> 0:11:42.559
<v Speaker 1>one pick, two sacks. Uh Tee Higgins biggest target once again,

0:11:42.600 --> 0:11:45.079
<v Speaker 1>six for one twenty five. Bengals were eight of seventeen

0:11:45.120 --> 0:11:48.040
<v Speaker 1>on third down, two of two on fourth down. They're

0:11:48.040 --> 0:11:51.160
<v Speaker 1>O sixteen and one in their last seventeen road games.

0:11:51.200 --> 0:11:54.120
<v Speaker 1>For those who like UH longer stats from even before

0:11:54.200 --> 0:11:56.240
<v Speaker 1>Joe Burrow was around with the Bengals, Oh sixteen and

0:11:56.240 --> 0:11:59.920
<v Speaker 1>one last seventeen road games. That's their third loss this season.

0:12:00.160 --> 0:12:03.400
<v Speaker 1>The Bengals third loss this season by five points are

0:12:03.520 --> 0:12:07.800
<v Speaker 1>fewer and under Zach Taylor. Now they're three eighteen and one,

0:12:09.200 --> 0:12:12.360
<v Speaker 1>three eighteen and one, outscored by the Colts thirty one

0:12:12.360 --> 0:12:14.199
<v Speaker 1>to six after leading twenty one and nothing. As I

0:12:14.240 --> 0:12:18.040
<v Speaker 1>said yesterday, I will say Cleveland is a It's not

0:12:18.080 --> 0:12:21.679
<v Speaker 1>going to be that high. I'll say Cleveland minus three.

0:12:22.000 --> 0:12:28.400
<v Speaker 1>At Cincinnati, it's three and a half. See two places

0:12:28.480 --> 0:12:33.280
<v Speaker 1>three with juice on the Browns. I'm gonna open three

0:12:33.320 --> 0:12:34.960
<v Speaker 1>and after. You know, Gil, if you remember at the

0:12:35.000 --> 0:12:37.319
<v Speaker 1>beginning of the year, I said not that Cincinnati is

0:12:37.320 --> 0:12:38.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna win a lot of games, but they're going to

0:12:38.960 --> 0:12:41.040
<v Speaker 1>cover a lot of numbers as a dog. And they

0:12:41.040 --> 0:12:44.400
<v Speaker 1>did yesterday. That staff that you threw out earlier about

0:12:44.440 --> 0:12:47.640
<v Speaker 1>their losses by five points or less, I think that

0:12:47.720 --> 0:12:50.800
<v Speaker 1>goes to prove it. Uh, my power ratings come to

0:12:51.080 --> 0:12:56.120
<v Speaker 1>five on Cleveland again without the home field advantage. Um,

0:12:56.280 --> 0:12:58.880
<v Speaker 1>how give sense much? But you know, I think three

0:12:58.880 --> 0:13:01.240
<v Speaker 1>and a half like folk hat to start with. But

0:13:01.320 --> 0:13:04.559
<v Speaker 1>you know, you look back at Baker Mayfield, still incredibly

0:13:04.640 --> 0:13:09.960
<v Speaker 1>inconsistent and Joe Burrow at seventy nine point three was

0:13:10.000 --> 0:13:13.160
<v Speaker 1>his qb R yesterday. So you know, they blew that game.

0:13:13.960 --> 0:13:16.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, I'm still not sure a boy Taylor as

0:13:16.160 --> 0:13:19.640
<v Speaker 1>a coach, but they blew that game. But it was

0:13:19.720 --> 0:13:22.560
<v Speaker 1>not Joe Burrow's fault in anyway he played. I thought

0:13:22.600 --> 0:13:26.199
<v Speaker 1>he played really well, certainly enough well enough for them

0:13:26.200 --> 0:13:29.640
<v Speaker 1>to win that game. Three and a half. I think

0:13:29.640 --> 0:13:31.880
<v Speaker 1>I'd probably be looking at dog in this game. But

0:13:31.960 --> 0:13:33.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, I know if I opened three, they'll just

0:13:34.440 --> 0:13:36.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, flood me with the minus streets. I'm an

0:13:36.360 --> 0:13:37.800
<v Speaker 1>open three and half to keep an eye on it.

0:13:38.200 --> 0:13:39.880
<v Speaker 1>I think three is probably a little bit of a

0:13:39.880 --> 0:13:41.640
<v Speaker 1>better number in this game. Three and a half to

0:13:41.720 --> 0:13:44.800
<v Speaker 1>me would be uh take or pass for sure? With

0:13:45.160 --> 0:13:48.920
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland cincinematic. Yeah, so I see it. Were you surprised

0:13:48.960 --> 0:13:54.079
<v Speaker 1>by your Steelers yesterday? Yeah? You know what you gave

0:13:54.160 --> 0:13:56.480
<v Speaker 1>the staff? What was Cleveland on third down? And you know,

0:13:56.520 --> 0:13:58.439
<v Speaker 1>I board did I hear it from Steeler fans this

0:13:58.559 --> 0:14:01.600
<v Speaker 1>last week? If I'm not a defense that I didn't

0:14:01.600 --> 0:14:03.640
<v Speaker 1>like the way they're playing, and the guys have given

0:14:03.679 --> 0:14:06.360
<v Speaker 1>me all these statistics, but I know what I was seeing.

0:14:06.400 --> 0:14:08.719
<v Speaker 1>They weren't making a lot of big plays when they

0:14:08.720 --> 0:14:11.080
<v Speaker 1>needed to. And I don't have the number right in

0:14:11.080 --> 0:14:14.000
<v Speaker 1>front of me, but their third down conversion rate as

0:14:14.040 --> 0:14:16.440
<v Speaker 1>the defense was not very good, and that's probably what

0:14:16.600 --> 0:14:19.280
<v Speaker 1>they came into my mind. I'm looking to get them

0:14:19.680 --> 0:14:22.160
<v Speaker 1>get the opposition off the field. They weren't always doing that,

0:14:22.200 --> 0:14:25.560
<v Speaker 1>but they certainly did that yesterday. You know, mankup Fitzpatrick,

0:14:25.640 --> 0:14:27.800
<v Speaker 1>which I never had much doubt, but like a lot

0:14:27.800 --> 0:14:30.000
<v Speaker 1>of guys were saying, he wasn't playing that well this year,

0:14:30.000 --> 0:14:33.280
<v Speaker 1>and he had the big interception returned for a touchdown

0:14:33.560 --> 0:14:36.040
<v Speaker 1>that really kind of set the tone for the game.

0:14:36.680 --> 0:14:40.240
<v Speaker 1>And I didn't make as terrific myself, so I think

0:14:40.240 --> 0:14:42.880
<v Speaker 1>he was well worth trading a number one draft choice for.

0:14:43.120 --> 0:14:46.240
<v Speaker 1>So I heard it by by a lot of steel offense.

0:14:46.320 --> 0:14:48.680
<v Speaker 1>But they did shut down Cleveland on third down and

0:14:48.720 --> 0:14:51.920
<v Speaker 1>that was the most impressive thing about that about their

0:14:51.920 --> 0:14:55.320
<v Speaker 1>defense yesterday, Very very consistent, and they really bottled up

0:14:55.320 --> 0:14:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Mayfield pretty good. Did Minka turned his career around like

0:14:58.760 --> 0:15:00.880
<v Speaker 1>immediately after that, right as soon as he put on

0:15:00.920 --> 0:15:04.320
<v Speaker 1>a Steeler's uniform one for just to repeat Cleveland one

0:15:04.360 --> 0:15:06.800
<v Speaker 1>of twelve on third downs yesterday, and oh for three

0:15:06.800 --> 0:15:09.800
<v Speaker 1>on fourth and again third down conversion rates both offensively.

0:15:09.840 --> 0:15:13.600
<v Speaker 1>In terms of defensive prevention of it probably more a

0:15:13.680 --> 0:15:17.280
<v Speaker 1>thing that regresses to a mean than necessarily predictive. By

0:15:17.280 --> 0:15:20.640
<v Speaker 1>the way, Cincinnati just repeat their stat third loss this

0:15:20.720 --> 0:15:23.600
<v Speaker 1>season by five points are fewer there, one, four, and one,

0:15:23.800 --> 0:15:26.480
<v Speaker 1>but three of those four losses by five points are fewer.

0:15:26.520 --> 0:15:29.760
<v Speaker 1>And then obviously the tie as well. Let's do one

0:15:29.760 --> 0:15:36.600
<v Speaker 1>more here, one more Dallas against your Washington football team,

0:15:36.840 --> 0:15:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Dallas at Washington. Dallas hasn't played, uh, and they will

0:15:39.840 --> 0:15:42.200
<v Speaker 1>play tonight. By the way, two games tonight, of course,

0:15:42.240 --> 0:15:46.320
<v Speaker 1>I should say one game this afternoon, really uh Pacific time.

0:15:46.760 --> 0:15:50.280
<v Speaker 1>It's a It's a five pm Eastern two pm Pacific

0:15:50.360 --> 0:15:54.040
<v Speaker 1>start between the Chiefs and the Bills. What an awkward time.

0:15:54.520 --> 0:15:56.680
<v Speaker 1>Awkward just in terms of a time. We're not used

0:15:56.720 --> 0:15:59.600
<v Speaker 1>to having a game start on a Monday, five pm Eastern,

0:15:59.600 --> 0:16:02.440
<v Speaker 1>two pm Pacific between Kansas City and Buffalo. The Chiefs

0:16:02.480 --> 0:16:04.720
<v Speaker 1>are five and a half point favorites in the first

0:16:04.720 --> 0:16:06.600
<v Speaker 1>of two tonight in the National Football need to close

0:16:06.600 --> 0:16:09.920
<v Speaker 1>out Week six, and then it's Arizona Dallas. Uh. The

0:16:09.960 --> 0:16:14.160
<v Speaker 1>originally scheduled Monday night I remember Kansas City Buffalo postponed

0:16:14.200 --> 0:16:18.920
<v Speaker 1>because Buffalo Tennessee UM had to get postponed. And then

0:16:18.920 --> 0:16:22.480
<v Speaker 1>it's just the whole Domino effect UM Arizona Dallas tonight.

0:16:22.560 --> 0:16:24.720
<v Speaker 1>Dallas is a one and a half point favorite. So

0:16:24.800 --> 0:16:26.880
<v Speaker 1>we get to see Andy Dalton start here. Not we

0:16:26.960 --> 0:16:29.760
<v Speaker 1>get to but sadly we see Andy Dalton start because

0:16:29.760 --> 0:16:33.120
<v Speaker 1>of Dak Prescott's season ending injury. So we don't know

0:16:33.160 --> 0:16:35.880
<v Speaker 1>about Dallas. We do know, as we just mentioned about

0:16:36.120 --> 0:16:40.760
<v Speaker 1>Washington yesterday, losing to the Giants, had the chance to

0:16:40.960 --> 0:16:44.200
<v Speaker 1>tie it and force what probably would have been overtime. Instead,

0:16:44.240 --> 0:16:46.200
<v Speaker 1>they go for two and they miss, and so Washington's

0:16:46.200 --> 0:16:49.480
<v Speaker 1>one in five. Dallas leads the NFCS that two and

0:16:49.680 --> 0:16:52.520
<v Speaker 1>three headed into tonight's game. By the way, Kyle Allen

0:16:52.600 --> 0:16:55.400
<v Speaker 1>yesterday for Washington thirty one of forty two for two,

0:16:55.400 --> 0:16:59.240
<v Speaker 1>eighty two touchdowns, one pick, sack three times. Terry McLaurin

0:16:59.440 --> 0:17:02.520
<v Speaker 1>always need to mention for any Washington box score, seven catches,

0:17:02.560 --> 0:17:05.520
<v Speaker 1>seventy four yards, I'll say a site unseen for the

0:17:05.520 --> 0:17:12.040
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys tonight, I'll say it's Dallas minus four. Chrissie. There

0:17:12.080 --> 0:17:15.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of numbers out there, a low of three

0:17:15.480 --> 0:17:18.359
<v Speaker 1>with some juice on the favorite and a high of four.

0:17:19.280 --> 0:17:21.240
<v Speaker 1>I see it all over the place now, you know,

0:17:21.560 --> 0:17:24.399
<v Speaker 1>if anybody was listening last week, I told everybody I

0:17:24.440 --> 0:17:27.400
<v Speaker 1>loved the Cowboys this week, Uh they were a two

0:17:27.440 --> 0:17:30.880
<v Speaker 1>point dog. They've not one. I'm still running one at

0:17:30.920 --> 0:17:33.960
<v Speaker 1>the south point, just one or one and a half.

0:17:34.640 --> 0:17:36.680
<v Speaker 1>So pretty big turnaround as far as the number goes.

0:17:36.920 --> 0:17:40.680
<v Speaker 1>But I expect Dallas to play well tonight. But still

0:17:40.800 --> 0:17:45.480
<v Speaker 1>my numbers only come to a four point differential, again

0:17:45.520 --> 0:17:48.119
<v Speaker 1>with no home field advantage, and I'm not sure Washington

0:17:48.800 --> 0:17:52.359
<v Speaker 1>has ever had a home field hand with that new stage. Yeah,

0:17:52.400 --> 0:17:55.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean their their home field is essentially zero. But

0:17:56.119 --> 0:17:58.320
<v Speaker 1>as a placeholder, I'm gonna open it three and a half.

0:17:58.359 --> 0:18:01.560
<v Speaker 1>See how that goes. Um. I think that that's an

0:18:01.560 --> 0:18:04.800
<v Speaker 1>okay starting point. But we'll see how Dallas plays that.

0:18:04.840 --> 0:18:06.760
<v Speaker 1>But like I said, I expect Dallas to play Weldon Man.

0:18:06.840 --> 0:18:10.520
<v Speaker 1>I think Andy Dalton is gonna be a very capable

0:18:10.600 --> 0:18:14.200
<v Speaker 1>substitute for Dak Prescott. I can't imagine. Again, we don't

0:18:14.240 --> 0:18:16.280
<v Speaker 1>know what's gonna happen with the Cowboys tonight. God forbid,

0:18:16.320 --> 0:18:18.040
<v Speaker 1>there's any more injuries for them. But I'm just saying

0:18:18.119 --> 0:18:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Dallas minus three. If that's what some have out there

0:18:21.480 --> 0:18:25.480
<v Speaker 1>against Washington, seems like an auto auto play on Dallas.

0:18:25.520 --> 0:18:28.040
<v Speaker 1>To man, I know, Dallas's defense is terrible, but it's

0:18:28.080 --> 0:18:30.560
<v Speaker 1>not like that's the thing. It's not like Washington has

0:18:30.600 --> 0:18:33.960
<v Speaker 1>the offense to exploit that though, you know. So it's

0:18:34.000 --> 0:18:37.000
<v Speaker 1>it's sort of weakness against weakness. And then if you

0:18:37.040 --> 0:18:38.680
<v Speaker 1>look at the other side of the ball, I'll take

0:18:38.960 --> 0:18:43.720
<v Speaker 1>I'll take Dallas's offense, despite how good Washington's defensive front

0:18:43.760 --> 0:18:47.000
<v Speaker 1>can be. I'll take Dallas's offense, and that so Dallas

0:18:47.680 --> 0:18:49.400
<v Speaker 1>you're putting up minus three and a half, he said,

0:18:50.760 --> 0:18:52.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm using three and a half, but I would I

0:18:52.920 --> 0:18:54.679
<v Speaker 1>would take a little bit of issue with Dad. I

0:18:54.720 --> 0:18:59.560
<v Speaker 1>think Dallas's defense is just so bad and Washington, you know,

0:18:59.600 --> 0:19:02.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, these guys are still professional athletes that were

0:19:02.800 --> 0:19:05.840
<v Speaker 1>stars through high school and college. You know, his face

0:19:05.920 --> 0:19:08.840
<v Speaker 1>and defense as bad as Dallas has been, and it's

0:19:08.880 --> 0:19:11.320
<v Speaker 1>been bad, I think they can put up some points.

0:19:11.320 --> 0:19:14.359
<v Speaker 1>So I'm not sure I automatically laid three, but the

0:19:14.400 --> 0:19:18.520
<v Speaker 1>public might, especially if Dallas looks good tonight. Um, let's

0:19:18.520 --> 0:19:26.000
<v Speaker 1>try one more here, Okay, Detroit and Atlanta. Detroit at Atlanta.

0:19:26.480 --> 0:19:29.320
<v Speaker 1>Detroit beats Jacksonville yesterday at the game that I probably

0:19:29.359 --> 0:19:33.080
<v Speaker 1>saw three plays of, Detroit beat some thirty four to sixteen.

0:19:33.080 --> 0:19:35.280
<v Speaker 1>They crushed him as three point favorites. A lot of

0:19:35.320 --> 0:19:38.080
<v Speaker 1>turnovers for Jacksonville. Are a lot of big turnovers in

0:19:38.119 --> 0:19:43.440
<v Speaker 1>that game. Um, let's see here. Detroit at Jacksonville detroited

0:19:43.480 --> 0:19:48.800
<v Speaker 1>Atlanta is the so Detroit yesterday. Stafford Stafford nineteen twenty three,

0:19:48.800 --> 0:19:53.160
<v Speaker 1>one touchdown, one pick, sacked zero times. DeAndre Swift greatest

0:19:53.240 --> 0:19:57.160
<v Speaker 1>name ever fourteen for one, sixteen on the ground, two touchdowns,

0:19:57.200 --> 0:19:59.800
<v Speaker 1>Golladay four for one oh five. Detroit's time of his

0:20:00.080 --> 0:20:03.240
<v Speaker 1>in advantage over Jacksonville thirty five fifty seven to twenty

0:20:03.240 --> 0:20:05.760
<v Speaker 1>four oh three. Consecutive road wins for the first time

0:20:05.760 --> 0:20:11.000
<v Speaker 1>since November twenty seventeen for the Detroit Lions. Congratulations to them.

0:20:11.240 --> 0:20:13.320
<v Speaker 1>And then there's Atlanta, which got off the schnight. Atlanta

0:20:13.359 --> 0:20:15.960
<v Speaker 1>with their first win of the year. They crushed Minnesota

0:20:16.000 --> 0:20:19.359
<v Speaker 1>forty to twenty three. Uh Matt Ryan thirty of forty

0:20:19.520 --> 0:20:22.320
<v Speaker 1>three seventy one, four touchdowns, no picks, sack two times,

0:20:22.359 --> 0:20:25.199
<v Speaker 1>Julio Jones eight for one, thirty seven, two touchdowns. They

0:20:25.200 --> 0:20:27.320
<v Speaker 1>were nine of seventeen on third down, three for three

0:20:27.359 --> 0:20:30.000
<v Speaker 1>on four four sixty two total yards. They were plus

0:20:30.000 --> 0:20:32.440
<v Speaker 1>two in turnovers, and they had the ball for over

0:20:32.520 --> 0:20:36.040
<v Speaker 1>forty minutes versus the Vikings forty oh seven to nineteen

0:20:36.119 --> 0:20:41.680
<v Speaker 1>fifty three. And I said, Atlanta minus four, what say you,

0:20:41.680 --> 0:20:45.399
<v Speaker 1>you're a little high. It's almost a blanket three. I

0:20:45.400 --> 0:20:47.119
<v Speaker 1>see it a little bit of three with some juice

0:20:47.160 --> 0:20:49.840
<v Speaker 1>on the favorite. I gotta say I like that number better.

0:20:50.000 --> 0:20:53.679
<v Speaker 1>My my, my numbers have these two teams at exactly

0:20:53.760 --> 0:20:56.840
<v Speaker 1>even if we're gonna look at yesterday's game, you know,

0:20:56.880 --> 0:20:59.000
<v Speaker 1>I thought Stafford looked really good. In a matter of fact,

0:20:59.000 --> 0:21:02.840
<v Speaker 1>the whole deep the Detroit teams, particularly their offense, I

0:21:02.920 --> 0:21:06.080
<v Speaker 1>thought look really good. But they played a very bad

0:21:06.240 --> 0:21:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Jacksonville team I think all of us had earmarked is

0:21:10.280 --> 0:21:13.320
<v Speaker 1>the worst team in the league before the season started.

0:21:13.400 --> 0:21:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Of course, the Jets of blowing them away as far

0:21:15.600 --> 0:21:18.240
<v Speaker 1>as that goes. But I think you also look at

0:21:18.240 --> 0:21:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Atlanta against Minnesota, and again their offense looked great, but

0:21:22.840 --> 0:21:25.320
<v Speaker 1>it's looked great pretty much all year. First game of

0:21:25.440 --> 0:21:27.760
<v Speaker 1>the Raheem Morris is their head coach, so I think

0:21:27.800 --> 0:21:30.720
<v Speaker 1>that probably gave him a little bit of a psychological edge.

0:21:30.920 --> 0:21:34.840
<v Speaker 1>But also as Minnesota any good, I think we're conditioned

0:21:34.840 --> 0:21:36.920
<v Speaker 1>to think that they are, but I don't. I don't

0:21:36.960 --> 0:21:40.199
<v Speaker 1>think they aren't. I think that's been certainly one of

0:21:40.280 --> 0:21:43.800
<v Speaker 1>the big disappointments so far this year. So I think

0:21:43.840 --> 0:21:48.320
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing two teams that came off impressive wins against

0:21:48.920 --> 0:21:54.800
<v Speaker 1>highly unimpressive opponents. And I think we're just conditioned to

0:21:54.800 --> 0:21:57.120
<v Speaker 1>think Atlanta is a little better because their offensive been

0:21:57.160 --> 0:22:00.919
<v Speaker 1>so much better for so much longer that Uh. I

0:22:00.960 --> 0:22:03.159
<v Speaker 1>think the public probably will lay the three, but I'm

0:22:03.200 --> 0:22:05.160
<v Speaker 1>anna open three, and I'm willing to take a bet there.

0:22:05.200 --> 0:22:08.240
<v Speaker 1>And I think the lines are very live in this spot.

0:22:09.000 --> 0:22:10.960
<v Speaker 1>They laid me too. Three. I think that's gonna be fine.

0:22:11.000 --> 0:22:13.159
<v Speaker 1>I'm certainly willing to take a bet there. These are

0:22:13.160 --> 0:22:16.359
<v Speaker 1>pretty logical lines, like the guests is so far have

0:22:16.440 --> 0:22:18.880
<v Speaker 1>not been far off on these, And your point about

0:22:18.920 --> 0:22:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota's well taken. Kirk Cousins yesterday thirty six for three,

0:22:22.600 --> 0:22:26.200
<v Speaker 1>forty three, three touchdowns, three picks, but those three picks

0:22:26.240 --> 0:22:28.840
<v Speaker 1>were all in the first half. It's the first time

0:22:28.880 --> 0:22:32.520
<v Speaker 1>he's ever in his illustrious interception throwing career, and he

0:22:32.640 --> 0:22:35.800
<v Speaker 1>was on epically historical pace. People who forget his early

0:22:35.880 --> 0:22:42.280
<v Speaker 1>days with Washington, epically historical interception pace before the you

0:22:42.359 --> 0:22:45.280
<v Speaker 1>like that game against the Buccaneers which sort of just

0:22:45.320 --> 0:22:47.880
<v Speaker 1>flipped his career. Uh, this is the first time he's

0:22:47.880 --> 0:22:50.480
<v Speaker 1>ever thrown three interceptions in the first half. Ever. He

0:22:50.560 --> 0:22:55.560
<v Speaker 1>has had twenty multiple interception games in his career. His

0:22:55.720 --> 0:22:59.679
<v Speaker 1>teams in those twenty multiple interception games, oh and twenty

0:23:00.720 --> 0:23:04.359
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, and then you know the rushing yards for

0:23:04.400 --> 0:23:09.720
<v Speaker 1>the Vikings yesterday, thirty two total rushing yards. Again no Dalvin, right,

0:23:10.040 --> 0:23:12.240
<v Speaker 1>but thirty two total rushing yards. That ain't gonna get

0:23:12.240 --> 0:23:15.960
<v Speaker 1>it done. So, um, falcons are the beneficiaries. I mean,

0:23:16.040 --> 0:23:18.000
<v Speaker 1>take nothing away from the Falcons. They will probably do

0:23:18.800 --> 0:23:20.760
<v Speaker 1>between now that we have the Falcons and the Giants,

0:23:20.800 --> 0:23:24.160
<v Speaker 1>who we've already talked about winning, it's only the Jets

0:23:24.200 --> 0:23:26.280
<v Speaker 1>who are winless now in the National Football League. So

0:23:26.280 --> 0:23:30.800
<v Speaker 1>you're opening detroited Atlanta what number again? I'm opening three?

0:23:30.880 --> 0:23:32.960
<v Speaker 1>And like I said, I'm pretty sure the public is

0:23:33.000 --> 0:23:34.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna lay this. I'm not sure which way. Why do

0:23:34.720 --> 0:23:36.119
<v Speaker 1>you guys are gonna go? But I think the public

0:23:36.160 --> 0:23:39.080
<v Speaker 1>is gonna lay this, and like I said, I'm certainly

0:23:39.080 --> 0:23:41.479
<v Speaker 1>willing to take a bet at the three. But I

0:23:41.520 --> 0:23:44.000
<v Speaker 1>think I think this will go to three and a

0:23:44.040 --> 0:23:47.600
<v Speaker 1>half sooner probably rather than later, and then we'll see

0:23:47.600 --> 0:23:49.400
<v Speaker 1>what the wise guys want to do. I think they'll

0:23:49.400 --> 0:23:51.680
<v Speaker 1>probably come in on the lines, but that's just a hunch.

0:23:51.760 --> 0:23:53.640
<v Speaker 1>But I think three is a good place to start.

0:23:53.840 --> 0:23:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Let's continue with guessing lines in week number seven. What's next,

0:23:59.600 --> 0:24:04.840
<v Speaker 1>ok it? We have Carolina at New Orleans. Carolina at

0:24:04.880 --> 0:24:07.800
<v Speaker 1>New Orleans. New Orleans will be coming off of by

0:24:08.000 --> 0:24:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Carolina loses. That was one of my two losses in

0:24:10.560 --> 0:24:14.439
<v Speaker 1>the contents. Yesterday Carolina loses to the Bears. So the

0:24:14.480 --> 0:24:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Bears go to five and one. We'll get to them,

0:24:17.040 --> 0:24:19.880
<v Speaker 1>but Carolina drops the three and three. Teddy Bridgewater yesterday

0:24:19.920 --> 0:24:23.119
<v Speaker 1>sixteen to sixteen, no touchdowns, two picks. He was sacked

0:24:23.119 --> 0:24:25.600
<v Speaker 1>four times. D J. Moore got the most of it

0:24:25.760 --> 0:24:29.520
<v Speaker 1>from him, five for ninety three. The Panthers out gained

0:24:29.520 --> 0:24:32.720
<v Speaker 1>the Bears three oh three to two sixty one, but

0:24:32.760 --> 0:24:35.320
<v Speaker 1>they were minus two in turnovers and that's usually the dilio.

0:24:35.600 --> 0:24:37.720
<v Speaker 1>By the way, you know I mentioned this with the

0:24:37.760 --> 0:24:41.240
<v Speaker 1>Bears against the Bucks on that Thursday night game, how

0:24:41.280 --> 0:24:44.800
<v Speaker 1>Matt Naggy, you know, the Bucks had one time out

0:24:44.880 --> 0:24:48.439
<v Speaker 1>left and they decided the Bears did to throw a

0:24:48.480 --> 0:24:50.640
<v Speaker 1>pass play, which of course went in completes of Tom

0:24:50.640 --> 0:24:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Brady ended up getting the ball with way more time

0:24:53.840 --> 0:24:55.879
<v Speaker 1>after the Bears go ahead field goal late than he

0:24:55.960 --> 0:24:58.720
<v Speaker 1>should have, and it ended up working out for the

0:24:58.760 --> 0:25:01.960
<v Speaker 1>Bears because Tom Brady had the senior moment, among other things,

0:25:01.960 --> 0:25:04.920
<v Speaker 1>and the Bears won the football game twenty to nineteen. Yesterday,

0:25:05.080 --> 0:25:07.640
<v Speaker 1>same same thing. The Bears left the time out on

0:25:07.680 --> 0:25:10.800
<v Speaker 1>the board for Carolina late when they threw a pass

0:25:10.920 --> 0:25:12.960
<v Speaker 1>when they shouldn't have right should have just bled the

0:25:13.000 --> 0:25:16.680
<v Speaker 1>clock made Carolina use their final time out. So Carolina

0:25:16.800 --> 0:25:18.480
<v Speaker 1>ends up with the ball a chance to tie the

0:25:18.560 --> 0:25:21.520
<v Speaker 1>game with the time out. UM, and it still worked

0:25:21.520 --> 0:25:23.760
<v Speaker 1>out for the Bears, so they get away with it

0:25:23.840 --> 0:25:26.720
<v Speaker 1>yet again. But Carolina loses to the Bears by the

0:25:26.720 --> 0:25:31.399
<v Speaker 1>final score yesterday. UM. Of of, let's make sure you

0:25:31.400 --> 0:25:34.840
<v Speaker 1>know that three to sixteen, and UM get it done

0:25:34.960 --> 0:25:37.400
<v Speaker 1>as a two point dog to the Bear. So this

0:25:37.440 --> 0:25:40.880
<v Speaker 1>one here, in this particular situation, though, I will take

0:25:41.040 --> 0:25:47.280
<v Speaker 1>New Orleans minus seven off of by Okay, they are

0:25:49.440 --> 0:25:52.359
<v Speaker 1>seven and a half pretty much everywhere I see seven's

0:25:53.240 --> 0:25:56.560
<v Speaker 1>with some juice on the favorite, but mostly seven a half,

0:25:56.560 --> 0:25:58.800
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of seven half little juice on the

0:25:58.960 --> 0:26:03.359
<v Speaker 1>dun I'm opening seven. The first thing I'm saying is,

0:26:03.840 --> 0:26:07.240
<v Speaker 1>at least you're in New Orleans? Is any good? And

0:26:07.640 --> 0:26:10.400
<v Speaker 1>my answer is no, I'm not sure they're any good

0:26:10.440 --> 0:26:13.560
<v Speaker 1>at all. And I just had them here they want.

0:26:13.600 --> 0:26:16.560
<v Speaker 1>They beat the Bucks opening week, okay, with Brady's first

0:26:16.560 --> 0:26:19.600
<v Speaker 1>game loss to the Raiders, lost to the Packers, Okay,

0:26:19.640 --> 0:26:23.480
<v Speaker 1>no disgrace there, beat the Lions by six, beat the

0:26:23.560 --> 0:26:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Chargers by three, so they even covered a seventh Okay,

0:26:26.880 --> 0:26:30.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry they did against the Buckets. Uh. In Carolina,

0:26:30.680 --> 0:26:33.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm not downgrading them after yesterday's win. And the more

0:26:33.760 --> 0:26:36.960
<v Speaker 1>I look at this Bearer's team, I think that listen,

0:26:37.000 --> 0:26:38.720
<v Speaker 1>they're five and one. How they're five and one, I

0:26:38.720 --> 0:26:42.399
<v Speaker 1>have no idea, but their defense is very, very good.

0:26:42.720 --> 0:26:45.360
<v Speaker 1>And I said it going into yesterday's game. I kind

0:26:45.359 --> 0:26:48.879
<v Speaker 1>of like Carolina Myselfiah, but I think Gridgewater is getting

0:26:48.920 --> 0:26:52.119
<v Speaker 1>better and better and better since that horrific injury had

0:26:52.160 --> 0:26:54.960
<v Speaker 1>a couple of years ago. He did not play well yesterday.

0:26:54.960 --> 0:26:56.959
<v Speaker 1>There's no doubt didn't play well at all, But like

0:26:57.000 --> 0:26:58.960
<v Speaker 1>I said, I think he was born to get a

0:26:59.080 --> 0:27:02.199
<v Speaker 1>very tough defense. You know, my numbers come more to

0:27:02.280 --> 0:27:06.439
<v Speaker 1>like six in this game, uh than seven and a half.

0:27:07.200 --> 0:27:09.800
<v Speaker 1>And the seven and a half seems like an awfully

0:27:09.880 --> 0:27:13.159
<v Speaker 1>high number for a team that I'm just not sure

0:27:13.200 --> 0:27:15.400
<v Speaker 1>of at all. And I think Caroline is getting better

0:27:15.440 --> 0:27:18.360
<v Speaker 1>and better as the year has gone on. So I'm

0:27:18.359 --> 0:27:21.119
<v Speaker 1>opening seven. I'm sure they'll lay it to me. That's fine.

0:27:21.359 --> 0:27:24.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm willing to take a bet there, But seven and

0:27:24.520 --> 0:27:26.159
<v Speaker 1>a half to me too high, and I have a

0:27:26.200 --> 0:27:28.240
<v Speaker 1>feeling the wise guys are gonna come in on Caroline

0:27:28.280 --> 0:27:32.240
<v Speaker 1>on this one. Possible that Christian McCaffrey will not return

0:27:32.480 --> 0:27:36.080
<v Speaker 1>until the November eighth game at Kansas City, pardon me,

0:27:36.520 --> 0:27:39.200
<v Speaker 1>which would mean he would miss six six games altogether.

0:27:39.720 --> 0:27:42.600
<v Speaker 1>So help is eventually on the way, but not really

0:27:43.240 --> 0:27:46.520
<v Speaker 1>anytime soon for the Carolina Panthers. So you are opening seven,

0:27:46.520 --> 0:27:50.679
<v Speaker 1>You're opening the number that I guessed on that. All right,

0:27:50.720 --> 0:27:55.000
<v Speaker 1>let's do one more here. Buffalo at the New York Jets.

0:27:55.080 --> 0:28:00.679
<v Speaker 1>Buffalo at the Jets. Buffalo again plays today. Buffalo's got

0:28:00.760 --> 0:28:03.040
<v Speaker 1>that game against Kansas City it's the early game, the

0:28:03.040 --> 0:28:06.199
<v Speaker 1>five pm Eastern two pm Pacific game. Buffalo five and

0:28:06.200 --> 0:28:09.520
<v Speaker 1>a half point Dogs hosting Kansas City today, Buffaloes four

0:28:09.560 --> 0:28:12.719
<v Speaker 1>and one. As far as the Jets, UH, the Jets

0:28:12.720 --> 0:28:14.880
<v Speaker 1>are now oh and six. They're the only winless team

0:28:14.920 --> 0:28:17.680
<v Speaker 1>in the National Football League. They got past their own

0:28:17.800 --> 0:28:21.440
<v Speaker 1>thirty three yard line yesterday in a just a absolute

0:28:21.800 --> 0:28:24.560
<v Speaker 1>destruction by the Dolphins. Dolphins beat him twenty four to nothing.

0:28:24.800 --> 0:28:27.000
<v Speaker 1>Jets got past their own thirty three yard line on

0:28:27.000 --> 0:28:30.200
<v Speaker 1>one drive in the first half. Only four drives in

0:28:30.240 --> 0:28:32.520
<v Speaker 1>the entire game did they get past their own thirty

0:28:32.520 --> 0:28:34.920
<v Speaker 1>three yard line, and two of those were in garbage time.

0:28:35.880 --> 0:28:37.720
<v Speaker 1>With under ten minutes left in the second half, the

0:28:37.800 --> 0:28:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Jets were down twenty one and nothing. I don't know

0:28:39.360 --> 0:28:41.600
<v Speaker 1>if anybody noticed this, but this is when you know

0:28:41.720 --> 0:28:45.560
<v Speaker 1>you're a really bad football team. Under ten minutes left

0:28:45.560 --> 0:28:48.120
<v Speaker 1>in the UH. This is in the third quarter, now

0:28:48.160 --> 0:28:50.040
<v Speaker 1>what I'm talking. Under ten minutes left in the third quarter.

0:28:50.400 --> 0:28:54.400
<v Speaker 1>Jets are down twenty one and nothing in Miami unsuccessfully

0:28:54.480 --> 0:28:56.840
<v Speaker 1>tries to draw the Jets off sides. I think it

0:28:56.880 --> 0:29:00.320
<v Speaker 1>was a fourth and short near midfield. Brian fitz Patrick

0:29:00.360 --> 0:29:03.760
<v Speaker 1>does the hard count, they unsuccessfully. The Dolphins unsuccessfully try

0:29:03.800 --> 0:29:06.880
<v Speaker 1>to draw the Jets off side about two seconds after

0:29:06.960 --> 0:29:09.640
<v Speaker 1>the whistle blows to indicate that it's a delay of

0:29:09.680 --> 0:29:12.680
<v Speaker 1>game in the five yard penalty. Ryan Fitzpatrick just sort

0:29:12.680 --> 0:29:16.760
<v Speaker 1>of comically stays behind center in a crouch and keeps

0:29:16.840 --> 0:29:20.760
<v Speaker 1>yelling things and then just laughs, just smiles, because he's

0:29:20.760 --> 0:29:22.920
<v Speaker 1>just having such a gay old time out there right

0:29:22.960 --> 0:29:25.280
<v Speaker 1>that he's just like, this is ridiculous. But that's when

0:29:25.320 --> 0:29:27.720
<v Speaker 1>you know your football team is a joke. When the

0:29:27.720 --> 0:29:30.520
<v Speaker 1>other player just doesn't care anymore. By the way, Flacco

0:29:30.640 --> 0:29:35.200
<v Speaker 1>yesterday forty four for one, no touchdowns, one pick, three sacks,

0:29:35.240 --> 0:29:37.800
<v Speaker 1>one of which was comical. The Jets were two of

0:29:38.000 --> 0:29:41.680
<v Speaker 1>seventeen on third down. They didn't convert a third down

0:29:41.680 --> 0:29:44.160
<v Speaker 1>till the fourth quarter. Miami wasn't good on third downs either.

0:29:44.480 --> 0:29:46.600
<v Speaker 1>They're the only wins winless team, as I mentioned in

0:29:46.640 --> 0:29:50.000
<v Speaker 1>the NFL three losses by twenty plus points. It's their

0:29:50.040 --> 0:29:53.920
<v Speaker 1>first o and six starts since when Rich co Tight

0:29:54.040 --> 0:29:56.640
<v Speaker 1>was their coach. Whenever you invoke co Tight, it's bad.

0:29:57.440 --> 0:30:01.720
<v Speaker 1>And they've been outscored one fourteen to twenty nine in

0:30:01.760 --> 0:30:04.640
<v Speaker 1>the first half this season. They were outscored one fourteen

0:30:04.680 --> 0:30:07.320
<v Speaker 1>to nine in the first half this season, including twenty

0:30:07.320 --> 0:30:12.120
<v Speaker 1>one to nothing yesterday. Chrissie, we gotta go to break

0:30:12.120 --> 0:30:13.760
<v Speaker 1>because I'm gonna get your number after I guess mine

0:30:13.840 --> 0:30:18.320
<v Speaker 1>right here. But they are they are really bad, like

0:30:19.240 --> 0:30:21.680
<v Speaker 1>so bad. I mentioned this last week on the show.

0:30:22.440 --> 0:30:25.920
<v Speaker 1>One of the probably best Survivor strategies this year is

0:30:26.280 --> 0:30:28.640
<v Speaker 1>just take the team that plays the Jets, like if

0:30:28.680 --> 0:30:31.240
<v Speaker 1>you you can't do it every week because you're obviously

0:30:31.240 --> 0:30:34.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna play teams in their division twice. But man, are

0:30:34.800 --> 0:30:38.080
<v Speaker 1>they bad? And Sam Donald now trade rumors uh starting

0:30:38.120 --> 0:30:40.280
<v Speaker 1>to fly about him getting traded indeed, so we shall

0:30:40.280 --> 0:30:42.480
<v Speaker 1>see there. I'll say Buffalo minus ten at the Jets

0:30:42.520 --> 0:30:44.280
<v Speaker 1>will find out what the number is coming back on

0:30:44.280 --> 0:30:47.840
<v Speaker 1>a numbers game at vicent these sports betting network. We

0:30:48.280 --> 0:30:51.920
<v Speaker 1>haven't gone over your Bills and Jets number. Oh, I said,

0:30:51.920 --> 0:30:54.239
<v Speaker 1>Bills minus ten. That's right, go ahead, what's what do you?

0:30:54.280 --> 0:30:59.000
<v Speaker 1>What do you no? We have not I apologize? Yes, Okay.

0:30:59.280 --> 0:31:04.000
<v Speaker 1>First of all, uh, my freend Barry who's from Miami

0:31:04.080 --> 0:31:06.880
<v Speaker 1>is probably listening right now, and it doesn't have a

0:31:06.960 --> 0:31:11.240
<v Speaker 1>high opinion of coach Gaze. Let's just say the first

0:31:11.240 --> 0:31:14.760
<v Speaker 1>time Gaze went to half time and as a head

0:31:14.760 --> 0:31:18.800
<v Speaker 1>coach in Miami and saw Miami up by twenty one point.

0:31:19.240 --> 0:31:24.520
<v Speaker 1>That was pretty good twist, you know, Uh yeah, this,

0:31:25.000 --> 0:31:26.960
<v Speaker 1>you know. And during the break, I was looking for

0:31:27.000 --> 0:31:29.920
<v Speaker 1>this chart, so I don't it's not a candlestick chart.

0:31:29.960 --> 0:31:31.680
<v Speaker 1>I forget what they call this chart. It's kind of

0:31:31.720 --> 0:31:35.840
<v Speaker 1>like a plus minus chart of games with their final outcome.

0:31:36.280 --> 0:31:40.680
<v Speaker 1>And it's so bad for Adam Gays. It's unbelievably horrible.

0:31:41.600 --> 0:31:44.080
<v Speaker 1>On how many games he's lost to buy you know,

0:31:44.120 --> 0:31:46.000
<v Speaker 1>a certain number of points, and how many games he's won.

0:31:46.240 --> 0:31:49.440
<v Speaker 1>The wins obviously are very few, and four between. My

0:31:49.600 --> 0:31:54.720
<v Speaker 1>numbers come to eighteen on this game. My first mention

0:31:54.800 --> 0:32:00.040
<v Speaker 1>of diminishing returns because you know, I don't think of

0:32:00.120 --> 0:32:03.600
<v Speaker 1>a road favorite eighteen points in the NFL. But anyway,

0:32:03.640 --> 0:32:08.160
<v Speaker 1>the number is eleven, and I'm gonna open eleven. But

0:32:08.200 --> 0:32:10.360
<v Speaker 1>if I because I do see one Tan out there,

0:32:10.840 --> 0:32:13.400
<v Speaker 1>if I see this trending higher in any way, shape

0:32:13.480 --> 0:32:19.120
<v Speaker 1>or form, I'm going high. This team is historically bad

0:32:19.200 --> 0:32:23.880
<v Speaker 1>as far as my methodology of keeping power ratings. This

0:32:23.960 --> 0:32:27.920
<v Speaker 1>is the worst I have ever had, I believe for

0:32:27.960 --> 0:32:30.440
<v Speaker 1>the Jets, and they're playing a very good team, by

0:32:30.480 --> 0:32:32.360
<v Speaker 1>the way, and I know they've got trounced last week,

0:32:32.640 --> 0:32:34.680
<v Speaker 1>but I expect them the show tonight. And I don't

0:32:34.720 --> 0:32:36.680
<v Speaker 1>know if they beat Kansas City, but I think this

0:32:36.720 --> 0:32:39.360
<v Speaker 1>will be a very very close game. So I'm gonna

0:32:39.400 --> 0:32:41.600
<v Speaker 1>open at eleven. But if I see a trending higher

0:32:41.600 --> 0:32:43.920
<v Speaker 1>in any way, I'm going to higher myself. Yeah. And

0:32:43.960 --> 0:32:45.840
<v Speaker 1>Sam Donald, by the way, who suffered an a C

0:32:46.080 --> 0:32:48.680
<v Speaker 1>joint sprain in his throwing shoulder during that Thursday Night

0:32:48.720 --> 0:32:51.400
<v Speaker 1>lost to the Broncos, hasn't played in two weeks, and

0:32:51.440 --> 0:32:54.720
<v Speaker 1>now it seems to have drifted into if you believe

0:32:54.720 --> 0:32:59.080
<v Speaker 1>reports they're trying to trade Sam Donald, Joe Flacco looks

0:32:59.160 --> 0:33:01.600
<v Speaker 1>like he care is as much about a football game

0:33:02.240 --> 0:33:04.480
<v Speaker 1>as I do about the opera that's taking place in

0:33:04.720 --> 0:33:08.400
<v Speaker 1>uh elsewhere tonight. I don't know where. I care as little,

0:33:08.720 --> 0:33:10.800
<v Speaker 1>no matter where it is, But he just doesn't look

0:33:10.840 --> 0:33:13.560
<v Speaker 1>like he cares at all. And that might just be

0:33:13.640 --> 0:33:15.600
<v Speaker 1>his face, might just be the Flacco face. Maybe he

0:33:15.640 --> 0:33:18.520
<v Speaker 1>cares deeply, but I just don't. I just don't get

0:33:18.520 --> 0:33:21.040
<v Speaker 1>that that feeling about it when you watch him at

0:33:21.080 --> 0:33:25.440
<v Speaker 1>a game. Uh. And the Dolphins for your friend the Dolphins. Uh,

0:33:25.480 --> 0:33:27.360
<v Speaker 1>they were one of nine on third downs. We got

0:33:27.360 --> 0:33:29.080
<v Speaker 1>to see two of for two passes two it was

0:33:29.160 --> 0:33:32.600
<v Speaker 1>two of two for nine yards um. Consecutive wins by

0:33:32.600 --> 0:33:34.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty plus points for the first time for the Dolphins,

0:33:35.280 --> 0:33:39.080
<v Speaker 1>the first time the Miami Dolphins have been ahead of

0:33:39.120 --> 0:33:41.240
<v Speaker 1>the New England Patriots in the a f C East

0:33:41.240 --> 0:33:44.320
<v Speaker 1>and Week six or later since two thousand and eight.

0:33:44.840 --> 0:33:47.560
<v Speaker 1>First time week six or later since two thousand and

0:33:47.560 --> 0:33:50.280
<v Speaker 1>eight that they've been ahead of the Patriots. Take that

0:33:50.360 --> 0:33:52.320
<v Speaker 1>for what it's worth, But what are you posting? Then?

0:33:52.400 --> 0:33:58.800
<v Speaker 1>What's the final number? That's the highest water market I see.

0:33:58.840 --> 0:34:00.680
<v Speaker 1>So that's where I'm gonna go with. I see a

0:34:00.720 --> 0:34:02.800
<v Speaker 1>little bit lower in some spots, but I'm gonna stay

0:34:02.880 --> 0:34:05.800
<v Speaker 1>high on this one. These guesses have been spot on,

0:34:06.520 --> 0:34:12.000
<v Speaker 1>spot on, all right, give me one more Packers at

0:34:12.000 --> 0:34:16.600
<v Speaker 1>the Texas Packers at the Texans. Okay, Green Bay loses

0:34:16.600 --> 0:34:19.040
<v Speaker 1>the Tampa Bay. Yesterday, Green Bay loses the Tampa Bay

0:34:19.080 --> 0:34:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Rodgers was sixteen of thirty five or one sixty no touchdowns,

0:34:22.040 --> 0:34:25.600
<v Speaker 1>two picks. He was sacked four times, only two hundred

0:34:25.600 --> 0:34:28.280
<v Speaker 1>and one total yards of offense for the Packers. Yesterday

0:34:28.440 --> 0:34:31.200
<v Speaker 1>they were minus two in turnovers, but those two turnovers

0:34:31.239 --> 0:34:34.080
<v Speaker 1>because it was zero versus two, those two turn two

0:34:34.120 --> 0:34:36.840
<v Speaker 1>turnovers were two Aaron Rodgers picks. The Packers were up

0:34:36.840 --> 0:34:39.120
<v Speaker 1>in this game ten to nothing, and it looked like

0:34:39.160 --> 0:34:42.080
<v Speaker 1>they were going to dominate this football game, really and

0:34:42.080 --> 0:34:45.160
<v Speaker 1>then a pick six to Jamal Dean thirty two yards

0:34:45.160 --> 0:34:47.520
<v Speaker 1>to the house made it ten to seven. Then three

0:34:47.560 --> 0:34:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Packers offensive plays later on the ensuing drive, Mike Edwards

0:34:50.920 --> 0:34:53.960
<v Speaker 1>returns to pick thirty seven yards to the Green Bay

0:34:53.960 --> 0:34:57.880
<v Speaker 1>to next play touchdown. Green Bay never scored again, thirty

0:34:58.040 --> 0:35:00.960
<v Speaker 1>eight straight for the Tampa Bay Buck and years and

0:35:01.040 --> 0:35:03.080
<v Speaker 1>green Bay falls from the ranks of the unbeaten. So

0:35:03.080 --> 0:35:07.240
<v Speaker 1>now we have three unbeaten Tennessee, Pittsburgh in Seattle. Houston

0:35:07.920 --> 0:35:12.600
<v Speaker 1>loses to Tennessee. Uh, we should probably talk about that.

0:35:12.880 --> 0:35:16.400
<v Speaker 1>Houston loses to Tennessee forty two to thirty six at overtime.

0:35:16.600 --> 0:35:19.960
<v Speaker 1>Deshaun Watson thirty seven for three thirty five, four touchdowns,

0:35:19.960 --> 0:35:23.760
<v Speaker 1>no picks. He was sacked twice fuller six for to touchdown.

0:35:23.760 --> 0:35:27.040
<v Speaker 1>It's Houston's worst start at one in five since two

0:35:27.040 --> 0:35:34.040
<v Speaker 1>thousand five. Okay, let's talk about Romeo Crennell. First, Romeo Crenell,

0:35:34.520 --> 0:35:36.600
<v Speaker 1>let's do the one that everybody's talking about. Then we'll

0:35:36.640 --> 0:35:38.960
<v Speaker 1>do the part that that no one's talking about, or

0:35:39.040 --> 0:35:42.040
<v Speaker 1>very few people are talking about. But Derrick Stevens Wash

0:35:42.480 --> 0:35:44.880
<v Speaker 1>was smart enough to talk about this morning on Follow

0:35:44.960 --> 0:35:49.799
<v Speaker 1>the Money. Uh. First of all, Romeo Crenell Houston got

0:35:49.880 --> 0:35:51.960
<v Speaker 1>decides to go for it on fourth and goal at

0:35:52.000 --> 0:35:55.120
<v Speaker 1>the Tennessee one up thirty to twenty nine with one

0:35:55.200 --> 0:35:58.120
<v Speaker 1>fifty three left. Okay, that's the right play Watson to

0:35:58.200 --> 0:36:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Cook's touchdown, But then they're up thirty six to twenty nine,

0:36:03.200 --> 0:36:06.480
<v Speaker 1>and instead of kicking an extra point to go up eight,

0:36:06.880 --> 0:36:09.480
<v Speaker 1>they go for two to try to go up nine

0:36:09.800 --> 0:36:13.120
<v Speaker 1>and seal the deal. At least that's Romeo Cornell's thinking.

0:36:13.920 --> 0:36:17.120
<v Speaker 1>They fail, because, of course they do. Watson to Cobb

0:36:17.560 --> 0:36:20.560
<v Speaker 1>was the intended pass, so that, of course then means

0:36:20.560 --> 0:36:22.799
<v Speaker 1>they're only up thirty six to twenty nine instead of

0:36:22.840 --> 0:36:24.719
<v Speaker 1>just kicking the extra point and going up thirty seven.

0:36:25.719 --> 0:36:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Of course, it leads to an eleven play, seventy six

0:36:29.640 --> 0:36:33.160
<v Speaker 1>yard drive that with one forty five left in the game,

0:36:33.160 --> 0:36:37.520
<v Speaker 1>took one forty one. Uh Tannehill to Brown seven yard

0:36:37.560 --> 0:36:40.000
<v Speaker 1>touchdown pass to win it, or excuse me, to tie

0:36:40.040 --> 0:36:43.359
<v Speaker 1>the game. Once they hit the extra point four seconds left, then,

0:36:43.400 --> 0:36:46.520
<v Speaker 1>of course Tennessee wins the coin flip in overtime, and

0:36:46.560 --> 0:36:49.160
<v Speaker 1>on the second play of overtime, Tannehill to Henry Little

0:36:49.160 --> 0:36:52.520
<v Speaker 1>pass goes fifty three yards. Four plays later, Henry crashes

0:36:52.560 --> 0:36:55.560
<v Speaker 1>in from the five ball game forty two to thirty six. Uh.

0:36:55.600 --> 0:36:59.880
<v Speaker 1>That's Tennessee's fourth win this season by six points or fewer.

0:37:00.080 --> 0:37:02.640
<v Speaker 1>But enough about Tennessee. Let's get back to Crinell for

0:37:02.680 --> 0:37:05.120
<v Speaker 1>a second. We'll get to Tennessee in a minute. Crenell

0:37:05.320 --> 0:37:10.680
<v Speaker 1>deciding Chrissy to go up nine, try to go up nine,

0:37:10.920 --> 0:37:13.719
<v Speaker 1>up seven with one forty five left in the game,

0:37:13.760 --> 0:37:16.239
<v Speaker 1>instead of just kicking the extra point again, getting back

0:37:16.280 --> 0:37:21.759
<v Speaker 1>to our discussion earlier, just stop overthinking it. Kick the

0:37:21.840 --> 0:37:25.160
<v Speaker 1>extra point because it makes the other team have to

0:37:25.239 --> 0:37:29.480
<v Speaker 1>successfully do two things, not one two, because we're again

0:37:29.480 --> 0:37:33.000
<v Speaker 1>we're assuming the Uh. If you get a touchdown, you're

0:37:33.080 --> 0:37:35.920
<v Speaker 1>expected point value of a two point conversion is around

0:37:36.360 --> 0:37:39.440
<v Speaker 1>is just around one, meaning it's a fifty fifty proposition.

0:37:39.719 --> 0:37:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Whereas with extra points, you know it's still much closer

0:37:43.120 --> 0:37:47.760
<v Speaker 1>to to getting the point converted, you're expected point values

0:37:47.840 --> 0:37:49.759
<v Speaker 1>just shy of one. You're gonna miss some, but you're

0:37:49.800 --> 0:37:53.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna make most of them. I just don't understand. I

0:37:53.640 --> 0:37:55.520
<v Speaker 1>get what. I get that. The thinking is, oh, we'll

0:37:55.560 --> 0:37:57.399
<v Speaker 1>go up nine in the game will be over. Yeah,

0:37:57.440 --> 0:38:00.879
<v Speaker 1>But if you don't and it's a fifty position, because

0:38:00.920 --> 0:38:02.960
<v Speaker 1>you're not the team with Derrick Henry, you're the team

0:38:03.000 --> 0:38:07.239
<v Speaker 1>that always goes and shotgun anyway in those situations, what

0:38:07.320 --> 0:38:12.040
<v Speaker 1>are you doing? And am I wrong? Oh no, I

0:38:12.040 --> 0:38:14.400
<v Speaker 1>think you're right. And the other thing that you know

0:38:15.040 --> 0:38:18.400
<v Speaker 1>is always part of the equation and I don't think

0:38:18.400 --> 0:38:24.040
<v Speaker 1>it's discussed enough is once, once you're you complete, whatever

0:38:24.080 --> 0:38:26.520
<v Speaker 1>it is, whether you kick or go for to make

0:38:26.680 --> 0:38:31.480
<v Speaker 1>miss whatever, the other team gets the ball. And right now,

0:38:31.800 --> 0:38:34.879
<v Speaker 1>like you said, the other team gets the ball, Okay,

0:38:35.040 --> 0:38:40.000
<v Speaker 1>they have to do two things just to tie you. Okay,

0:38:40.040 --> 0:38:42.560
<v Speaker 1>But then after that, well, I mean, you know, it

0:38:42.560 --> 0:38:45.400
<v Speaker 1>gets a little theoretical because we're getting into overtime. But

0:38:45.440 --> 0:38:47.239
<v Speaker 1>then you have a chance to get the ball, you know,

0:38:47.360 --> 0:38:51.440
<v Speaker 1>so you know, I mean, I thought like if you

0:38:51.520 --> 0:38:55.359
<v Speaker 1>just follow the dogs, you know, kicking and going up

0:38:55.440 --> 0:38:58.880
<v Speaker 1>a was absolutely the right choice. And there may be

0:38:58.960 --> 0:39:03.520
<v Speaker 1>some mathematical up out there that would indicate otherwise. But uh,

0:39:03.920 --> 0:39:07.520
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a psychology to it as well. Your

0:39:07.520 --> 0:39:11.680
<v Speaker 1>team has not one too many games this year. Uh,

0:39:11.719 --> 0:39:13.960
<v Speaker 1>and you have a chance to beat a very very

0:39:14.040 --> 0:39:18.480
<v Speaker 1>good team on the road by again by going up

0:39:18.520 --> 0:39:20.880
<v Speaker 1>eight and forcing them to do two different things just

0:39:20.920 --> 0:39:23.560
<v Speaker 1>to tie you. I think you know you had to

0:39:23.560 --> 0:39:25.520
<v Speaker 1>go for one there and go up bait. I think

0:39:25.560 --> 0:39:27.440
<v Speaker 1>you just had to. And you know I don't. I

0:39:27.480 --> 0:39:29.120
<v Speaker 1>don't want to second guess because we were in the

0:39:29.200 --> 0:39:31.359
<v Speaker 1>office at the time saying will you do this? And

0:39:31.640 --> 0:39:33.279
<v Speaker 1>none of us would. Oh, there was there was no

0:39:33.400 --> 0:39:36.040
<v Speaker 1>armchair quarterbacking with that. That was right at the moment.

0:39:36.120 --> 0:39:37.880
<v Speaker 1>What is he doing? What is he doing? And the

0:39:37.880 --> 0:39:40.759
<v Speaker 1>other way to say it is what you're doing up

0:39:40.840 --> 0:39:44.000
<v Speaker 1>seven right there is you're you're basically saying, you know what,

0:39:44.120 --> 0:39:46.960
<v Speaker 1>let's put the burden of converting the two point conversion

0:39:47.000 --> 0:39:50.200
<v Speaker 1>on us rather than on the other team. That sounds

0:39:50.239 --> 0:39:52.080
<v Speaker 1>like a smart thing to do instead of the other

0:39:52.120 --> 0:39:55.120
<v Speaker 1>way around. And just if that sentence alone doesn't drive

0:39:55.160 --> 0:39:57.640
<v Speaker 1>it home, I don't know what else does. Uh. It's

0:39:57.680 --> 0:40:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Green Bay at Houston. Getting back to the point, I'll

0:40:00.000 --> 0:40:03.880
<v Speaker 1>say Green Bay. I don't know. I'll say minus three

0:40:04.000 --> 0:40:09.440
<v Speaker 1>is that too short? My numbers come to three, uh,

0:40:09.719 --> 0:40:12.839
<v Speaker 1>but it's mostly three and a half. I do see

0:40:12.880 --> 0:40:14.759
<v Speaker 1>some threes out there with juice on the favorite, but

0:40:14.920 --> 0:40:17.000
<v Speaker 1>my numbers come to the three and halfs I said,

0:40:17.040 --> 0:40:19.360
<v Speaker 1>even though it's a little higher than what my power

0:40:19.440 --> 0:40:22.640
<v Speaker 1>ratings would be. I think the Packers coming off a

0:40:22.719 --> 0:40:26.320
<v Speaker 1>loss like that, I think you're really going to be

0:40:26.400 --> 0:40:29.880
<v Speaker 1>tremendously focused on this game and make amends. Where Houston

0:40:30.000 --> 0:40:32.399
<v Speaker 1>coming off a loss like that, I see it kind

0:40:32.400 --> 0:40:34.080
<v Speaker 1>of the other way. So I like three and a

0:40:34.120 --> 0:40:36.320
<v Speaker 1>half much better in this spot, even though my numbers

0:40:36.360 --> 0:40:38.560
<v Speaker 1>few a little bit lower. All right, when we come back,

0:40:39.120 --> 0:40:43.520
<v Speaker 1>everybody's talking about the Romeo Canal decision, the Romeo Crenell

0:40:43.600 --> 0:40:46.160
<v Speaker 1>decision to go for two, But we got to talk

0:40:46.160 --> 0:40:50.279
<v Speaker 1>about something that Mike Rabel did before that final sequence

0:40:50.560 --> 0:40:54.000
<v Speaker 1>on that same drive. That is the difference between winning

0:40:54.040 --> 0:40:59.240
<v Speaker 1>and losing football. Unbelievable what Mike Rabel did, and shout

0:40:59.239 --> 0:41:02.759
<v Speaker 1>out to him put him up there top tier, if

0:41:02.760 --> 0:41:05.240
<v Speaker 1>not at the top, right behind Belichick of NFL coaches.

0:41:05.280 --> 0:41:07.360
<v Speaker 1>We'll discuss it next. Guessing lines right here on the

0:41:07.400 --> 0:41:09.360
<v Speaker 1>Numbers game at Visa. These our number two of the

0:41:09.440 --> 0:41:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Numbers game right here at Visa, these boards Betting Network

0:41:11.440 --> 0:41:13.239
<v Speaker 1>series except Channel two or four, Visa dot Com, the

0:41:13.320 --> 0:41:16.480
<v Speaker 1>Visa that Food bos link A Game plus Skill Alexander,

0:41:16.480 --> 0:41:18.759
<v Speaker 1>How you doing? Jason Conn is here. Chrissie Andrews from

0:41:18.760 --> 0:41:21.719
<v Speaker 1>the South Point Hotel Casino sports Book guessing lines for

0:41:21.760 --> 0:41:23.759
<v Speaker 1>week number seven in the NFL. I don't think our

0:41:23.880 --> 0:41:26.680
<v Speaker 1>one turned up anything really like that was pretty ho

0:41:26.920 --> 0:41:31.279
<v Speaker 1>hum guessing slate of the of half the schedule thus far.

0:41:31.760 --> 0:41:33.400
<v Speaker 1>But what I want to get into here because we

0:41:33.520 --> 0:41:37.240
<v Speaker 1>just talked about the Houston side, because Green Bay at Houston,

0:41:37.640 --> 0:41:39.759
<v Speaker 1>Chrissy just throughout as a game next week. So we

0:41:39.800 --> 0:41:42.279
<v Speaker 1>talked about the Romeo Crennell thing. Chrissie, do you know

0:41:42.320 --> 0:41:44.239
<v Speaker 1>what I'm about to talk about with Mike Rabel or

0:41:44.280 --> 0:41:47.120
<v Speaker 1>you hip to what he did yesterday? Yeah? It was

0:41:47.160 --> 0:41:50.040
<v Speaker 1>the Xtra man on the field. Okay, but go ahead,

0:41:50.040 --> 0:41:51.640
<v Speaker 1>I'll let you say and then I have a comment

0:41:51.680 --> 0:41:54.520
<v Speaker 1>about it team Yeah, So okay. One of the staples

0:41:54.560 --> 0:41:56.640
<v Speaker 1>of of this show a numbers game at Visa through

0:41:56.680 --> 0:42:00.280
<v Speaker 1>the years talking football. You may remember my converse stations

0:42:00.320 --> 0:42:03.720
<v Speaker 1>with Todd wishnev about the rules and the NFL about

0:42:03.760 --> 0:42:06.520
<v Speaker 1>two point conversions and how you can manipulate it, how

0:42:06.560 --> 0:42:08.400
<v Speaker 1>the not how you can manipulate it, but how the

0:42:08.480 --> 0:42:11.080
<v Speaker 1>rules are really skewed in favor of the offensive team

0:42:11.120 --> 0:42:13.440
<v Speaker 1>at that point. Uh and you and we've talked on

0:42:13.480 --> 0:42:16.360
<v Speaker 1>this show about all the different little loopholes that coaches

0:42:16.920 --> 0:42:18.840
<v Speaker 1>there very few of them, but coaches in the NFL

0:42:19.320 --> 0:42:21.759
<v Speaker 1>can exploit. And one of the big ones we used

0:42:21.760 --> 0:42:25.360
<v Speaker 1>to talk about was when the clock was north of

0:42:25.440 --> 0:42:27.160
<v Speaker 1>five minutes. In other words, when there was more than

0:42:27.200 --> 0:42:30.680
<v Speaker 1>five minutes left in a football game and a team

0:42:30.760 --> 0:42:33.719
<v Speaker 1>was nursing a lead. Bill Belichick used to do it

0:42:33.760 --> 0:42:36.640
<v Speaker 1>all the time. He used to take multiple delay of

0:42:36.719 --> 0:42:39.359
<v Speaker 1>game penalties and as long as you were had more

0:42:39.400 --> 0:42:41.799
<v Speaker 1>than five minutes on the clock, and no matter how

0:42:41.800 --> 0:42:43.120
<v Speaker 1>many you know, you did it. When you were in

0:42:43.160 --> 0:42:46.319
<v Speaker 1>an advantageous position up late in the game, you could

0:42:46.360 --> 0:42:50.240
<v Speaker 1>take multiple delay of games and the clock would keep restarting.

0:42:50.920 --> 0:42:53.040
<v Speaker 1>I think you could do it about three times and

0:42:53.120 --> 0:42:55.200
<v Speaker 1>then they'd probably say, all right, we know what you're doing,

0:42:55.280 --> 0:42:57.160
<v Speaker 1>and you you'll get a flag if you do it again.

0:42:57.680 --> 0:43:00.520
<v Speaker 1>But Belichick did it a lot and Mike Rabel, who

0:43:00.520 --> 0:43:04.280
<v Speaker 1>of course played for Belichick, started doing this with the Titans,

0:43:04.360 --> 0:43:07.399
<v Speaker 1>and most famously last year, and we we just were

0:43:07.440 --> 0:43:10.040
<v Speaker 1>tickled by this. If you remember, in the playoff game

0:43:10.080 --> 0:43:14.280
<v Speaker 1>against the Patriots themselves, Vrabel and the and the Titans

0:43:14.320 --> 0:43:17.879
<v Speaker 1>were up fourteen to thirteen last year. Late and during

0:43:17.880 --> 0:43:21.759
<v Speaker 1>the fourth quarter he exploited that same loophole in the

0:43:21.840 --> 0:43:25.319
<v Speaker 1>rule book that allowed Tennessee to rule to run one

0:43:25.400 --> 0:43:28.720
<v Speaker 1>minute and forty nine seconds off the clock without running

0:43:28.719 --> 0:43:31.200
<v Speaker 1>a single play. And it was fitting because again, as

0:43:31.200 --> 0:43:33.440
<v Speaker 1>I said, it was the same strategy that Belichick, for instance,

0:43:33.520 --> 0:43:35.480
<v Speaker 1>used all the time. He used it during a thirty

0:43:35.480 --> 0:43:37.520
<v Speaker 1>three to nothing went over the Jets in October of

0:43:37.600 --> 0:43:40.279
<v Speaker 1>last year. So in that game in the playoffs, the

0:43:40.320 --> 0:43:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Titans had a fourth and five from the Patriots thirty

0:43:42.800 --> 0:43:46.520
<v Speaker 1>six yard line with just six thirty three left to play,

0:43:46.680 --> 0:43:49.399
<v Speaker 1>and uh Vrabel didn't want to kick a field goal

0:43:49.400 --> 0:43:52.400
<v Speaker 1>because the weather was was in clement, so he decided

0:43:52.440 --> 0:43:55.480
<v Speaker 1>to punt the ball, but not until his team took

0:43:55.480 --> 0:43:57.399
<v Speaker 1>a delay of game penalty, which took the clock down

0:43:57.400 --> 0:44:00.520
<v Speaker 1>to five fifty two left. Following that penalty, Titans got

0:44:00.520 --> 0:44:02.640
<v Speaker 1>a fresh twenty five second blay clock. They let the

0:44:02.680 --> 0:44:05.200
<v Speaker 1>new clock tick down to zero before taking a false

0:44:05.200 --> 0:44:08.400
<v Speaker 1>start penalty, which didn't sit well with Belichick. Belichick was

0:44:08.440 --> 0:44:10.600
<v Speaker 1>going nuts on the sideline because he's like, here's my

0:44:10.719 --> 0:44:13.560
<v Speaker 1>guy using my thing against me. It was awesome. At

0:44:13.640 --> 0:44:16.160
<v Speaker 1>that point, the clock was down to five after being

0:44:16.160 --> 0:44:18.680
<v Speaker 1>called for two penalties, the Titans were finally going upon it,

0:44:18.840 --> 0:44:21.080
<v Speaker 1>but then the Patriots, if you remember, jumped off sides,

0:44:21.320 --> 0:44:23.760
<v Speaker 1>which allowed the Titans. They clocked down to five thirteen,

0:44:24.320 --> 0:44:26.479
<v Speaker 1>and then after that penalty, the Titans got another fresh

0:44:26.520 --> 0:44:28.319
<v Speaker 1>twenty five second clock, and by the time they finally

0:44:28.320 --> 0:44:30.520
<v Speaker 1>snapped it, there was just four fifty left to play,

0:44:30.600 --> 0:44:32.640
<v Speaker 1>including the pun itself. The clock actually tick down to

0:44:32.680 --> 0:44:34.680
<v Speaker 1>four or forty four, which mean the Titans ran a

0:44:34.680 --> 0:44:36.719
<v Speaker 1>total of one minute and forty nine seconds off the

0:44:36.719 --> 0:44:39.400
<v Speaker 1>clock before the Patriots took possession. You may recall the

0:44:39.400 --> 0:44:44.279
<v Speaker 1>Titans end up winning it twenty thirteen. Um. Okay, So

0:44:45.120 --> 0:44:48.840
<v Speaker 1>that was that, and they changed that rule. By the way,

0:44:48.920 --> 0:44:51.399
<v Speaker 1>they changed the rule this offseason because they're like, oh, well,

0:44:51.440 --> 0:44:53.279
<v Speaker 1>you did it. They finally noticed it when it was

0:44:53.280 --> 0:44:56.080
<v Speaker 1>done on a big playoff stage and they're like, okay,

0:44:56.120 --> 0:44:58.000
<v Speaker 1>we know what you're up to buddy, then enough of

0:44:58.000 --> 0:45:00.160
<v Speaker 1>that rule Bill Belichick and Mike Rabel. But this was

0:45:00.200 --> 0:45:03.920
<v Speaker 1>the first sign that Mike Vrabel was smarter than the

0:45:03.960 --> 0:45:07.560
<v Speaker 1>average NFL coach, right, he was a Belichick design So

0:45:07.760 --> 0:45:10.200
<v Speaker 1>yesterday and again shout out to Derrick Stevens who picked

0:45:10.239 --> 0:45:12.000
<v Speaker 1>up on this. Also he mentioned it on Follow the

0:45:12.040 --> 0:45:16.799
<v Speaker 1>Money this morning. Yesterday, the same drive we're talking about,

0:45:16.960 --> 0:45:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Romeo Crenell ultimately decided we're going for two up seven

0:45:20.200 --> 0:45:21.520
<v Speaker 1>and we know how the rest of that went out.

0:45:21.520 --> 0:45:23.960
<v Speaker 1>We just talked about it. The Titans matriculated down the

0:45:24.000 --> 0:45:26.560
<v Speaker 1>field the force overtime. They win in overtime, by the way,

0:45:26.880 --> 0:45:30.320
<v Speaker 1>win for betters too. Just a tough beat for Houston

0:45:30.400 --> 0:45:34.160
<v Speaker 1>Texans betters. So yesterday Vrabel with it's got to be

0:45:34.200 --> 0:45:37.640
<v Speaker 1>the best decision of Week six and props. The real

0:45:37.719 --> 0:45:40.319
<v Speaker 1>people whom who talked about it the most is like

0:45:40.320 --> 0:45:43.600
<v Speaker 1>it are in a Titan sub reddit group, like that's how.

0:45:43.640 --> 0:45:47.160
<v Speaker 1>That's how because the announcers, of course said nothing, They

0:45:47.200 --> 0:45:49.040
<v Speaker 1>had no idea what was going on in this. So

0:45:49.080 --> 0:45:51.960
<v Speaker 1>the Titans trailed Texans thirty to twenty nine. They had

0:45:52.040 --> 0:45:55.600
<v Speaker 1>just turned over the ball on a Ryan Tannehill interception.

0:45:56.160 --> 0:45:59.480
<v Speaker 1>So Houston up thirty to twenty, up thirty to twenty

0:45:59.560 --> 0:46:02.920
<v Speaker 1>nine had a second and one at the Titans twenty

0:46:02.960 --> 0:46:06.200
<v Speaker 1>five yard line with three forty nine remaining on a

0:46:06.320 --> 0:46:09.840
<v Speaker 1>running clock. Uh now, follow me here, and let me

0:46:09.880 --> 0:46:13.000
<v Speaker 1>just pause to say it's kill Alexander and Chris Andrews

0:46:13.040 --> 0:46:14.440
<v Speaker 1>right here on a numbers game at Visa in these

0:46:14.440 --> 0:46:18.360
<v Speaker 1>sports betting network. Uh serious, except Channel two four guessing lines.

0:46:18.400 --> 0:46:20.920
<v Speaker 1>But also talking about this amazing thing that Mike Frabel

0:46:20.960 --> 0:46:25.000
<v Speaker 1>did yesterday, the difference between winning coaches and losing coaches

0:46:25.000 --> 0:46:26.800
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL. So second in one of the Titans

0:46:26.840 --> 0:46:29.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty five, three forty nine remaining on a running clock,

0:46:29.640 --> 0:46:31.560
<v Speaker 1>so you know they got a second and the third down,

0:46:31.600 --> 0:46:33.919
<v Speaker 1>they only need one one yard. The odds of them

0:46:33.920 --> 0:46:37.080
<v Speaker 1>converting that the Texans that is very high. But if

0:46:37.120 --> 0:46:41.680
<v Speaker 1>the Titans were penalized five yards, the clock would stop

0:46:42.400 --> 0:46:44.800
<v Speaker 1>and it would become a first down for the Texans,

0:46:45.160 --> 0:46:48.920
<v Speaker 1>and it would save approximately forty seconds of clock time.

0:46:49.320 --> 0:46:51.520
<v Speaker 1>And again, while it cost them the second down conversion,

0:46:52.160 --> 0:46:55.200
<v Speaker 1>they were likely to give it up anyway. So very so,

0:46:55.400 --> 0:46:59.719
<v Speaker 1>Mike Vrabel sent on an extra defender, putting twelve men

0:46:59.760 --> 0:47:03.520
<v Speaker 1>on the field on purpose and setting up the penalty.

0:47:03.560 --> 0:47:05.400
<v Speaker 1>And if you watch the video and shout out to

0:47:05.840 --> 0:47:08.399
<v Speaker 1>Mike Herndon at Mike Miracles on Twitter if you want

0:47:08.400 --> 0:47:12.880
<v Speaker 1>to see this, Mike Herndon at Mike Miracles. The video

0:47:13.040 --> 0:47:20.279
<v Speaker 1>shows cornerback Jonathan Joseph looking really confused, like coach, I'm

0:47:20.280 --> 0:47:23.719
<v Speaker 1>not supposed to be out here kind of expression, and

0:47:23.920 --> 0:47:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Rabel sort of telling him through his mask because we

0:47:27.080 --> 0:47:29.520
<v Speaker 1>can't see what he's actually saying, but basically saying, hey,

0:47:29.520 --> 0:47:32.640
<v Speaker 1>don't worry about it, everything's okay, just stay out just

0:47:32.680 --> 0:47:34.840
<v Speaker 1>stay out there kind of thing. He does a great

0:47:34.840 --> 0:47:38.359
<v Speaker 1>cell job and gets the penalty, and so in the end, yeah,

0:47:38.440 --> 0:47:40.440
<v Speaker 1>they matriculated it down to the one yard line, they

0:47:40.480 --> 0:47:42.359
<v Speaker 1>ended up getting the touchdown and then they then they

0:47:42.440 --> 0:47:44.800
<v Speaker 1>shot themselves in the foot with a terrible decision to

0:47:44.920 --> 0:47:47.319
<v Speaker 1>go for two, and again the rest is history. But

0:47:47.560 --> 0:47:50.839
<v Speaker 1>those they wouldn't have had one minute and forty five

0:47:50.880 --> 0:47:55.359
<v Speaker 1>seconds to work with the Titans had Vrabel not exploited

0:47:55.440 --> 0:47:59.200
<v Speaker 1>yet another thing in the rule books where he's like, well,

0:47:59.360 --> 0:48:02.839
<v Speaker 1>it's not even avoiding, it's you know what, um, it's

0:48:02.880 --> 0:48:07.919
<v Speaker 1>a positive e V. It is a wind probability plus

0:48:08.080 --> 0:48:10.719
<v Speaker 1>for him to do this right now, to throw out

0:48:10.719 --> 0:48:13.280
<v Speaker 1>a twelve min and take a penalty, stop the clock,

0:48:13.680 --> 0:48:18.279
<v Speaker 1>give them another set of downs. Genius, Chrissie, genius. That's

0:48:18.280 --> 0:48:22.640
<v Speaker 1>the difference between their win and their loss. Okay, one

0:48:22.719 --> 0:48:28.200
<v Speaker 1>thing you said. The announcer was in saying, said, well

0:48:28.440 --> 0:48:35.560
<v Speaker 1>there's another there's a mental mistake by Mirabel on the field. Yeah,

0:48:35.920 --> 0:48:40.440
<v Speaker 1>they said the opposite. Warren sharp on hit House. He

0:48:40.640 --> 0:48:45.240
<v Speaker 1>did the exact same thing. In ten they were playing

0:48:45.239 --> 0:48:49.879
<v Speaker 1>the Jets. The announcer again was Risk Annon, and Rich

0:48:49.960 --> 0:48:53.520
<v Speaker 1>Cannon again said this, well, yeah, he said at first,

0:48:54.480 --> 0:48:59.000
<v Speaker 1>obviously that another mistake by Mike Grabel, a mental error

0:48:59.080 --> 0:49:02.440
<v Speaker 1>by Mike Grabel by having twelve men on the field.

0:49:03.080 --> 0:49:07.239
<v Speaker 1>And both times obviously Brabel did it on purpose to

0:49:07.280 --> 0:49:11.160
<v Speaker 1>save the time, and it went past Rich Scannon twice.

0:49:11.560 --> 0:49:13.640
<v Speaker 1>I gotta say it would have gone past me too

0:49:13.760 --> 0:49:17.080
<v Speaker 1>had somebody not explained it to me. So I think Brabel.

0:49:17.320 --> 0:49:19.120
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, just to remind people out there,

0:49:19.239 --> 0:49:22.560
<v Speaker 1>he was originally a Steeler and I can't remember if

0:49:22.560 --> 0:49:24.479
<v Speaker 1>they cut him or traded him for some late draft

0:49:24.560 --> 0:49:26.080
<v Speaker 1>choice to get him over to New England. And I

0:49:26.120 --> 0:49:30.000
<v Speaker 1>remember at the time they get they crazy. This guy

0:49:30.320 --> 0:49:32.359
<v Speaker 1>is a terrific player, and he's had a great career.

0:49:32.400 --> 0:49:34.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how many Super Bowl rings he had,

0:49:34.400 --> 0:49:37.120
<v Speaker 1>and he's gonna be a terrific coach and he's already

0:49:37.160 --> 0:49:40.120
<v Speaker 1>in certain I'm not gonna put him up with Billichick yet,

0:49:40.160 --> 0:49:42.759
<v Speaker 1>but he's certainly in that upright. And the guy really

0:49:42.760 --> 0:49:47.680
<v Speaker 1>shows a lot of high level thinking, higher than most

0:49:47.680 --> 0:49:50.480
<v Speaker 1>of these coaches. Service he joined the Patriots as a

0:49:50.480 --> 0:49:54.880
<v Speaker 1>free agent. By the way, two, I think that Steelers

0:49:54.960 --> 0:49:58.040
<v Speaker 1>might have just cut him. Yeah, it could be. Uh,

0:49:58.040 --> 0:50:02.600
<v Speaker 1>it's it's just a amazing play, amazing heads up play

0:50:02.680 --> 0:50:05.200
<v Speaker 1>or heads up coaching decision by Mike Vrabel. And again

0:50:05.239 --> 0:50:09.200
<v Speaker 1>that's the difference between winning and losing. And certainly Romeo

0:50:09.320 --> 0:50:12.440
<v Speaker 1>Crennell then helped out as well after that, but they

0:50:12.440 --> 0:50:15.399
<v Speaker 1>don't get there without that decision from Rabel. So the

0:50:15.440 --> 0:50:20.440
<v Speaker 1>Titans remain undefeated. I'm guessing, because Jason kind of tipped

0:50:20.440 --> 0:50:22.279
<v Speaker 1>me off on this, that the Titans is the next game.

0:50:24.719 --> 0:50:27.560
<v Speaker 1>H No, I think that's Seahawks and Cardinals next. Seahawks

0:50:27.600 --> 0:50:30.879
<v Speaker 1>and Cardinals. Pardon me, Seahawks and Cardinals. Seahawks are coming

0:50:30.880 --> 0:50:33.320
<v Speaker 1>off of buy and the Cardinals haven't played yet. Cardinals

0:50:33.320 --> 0:50:36.440
<v Speaker 1>played the Cowboys again tonight in the second of the

0:50:36.440 --> 0:50:38.960
<v Speaker 1>two Monday Night games, the originally scheduled Monday Night game

0:50:39.480 --> 0:50:42.600
<v Speaker 1>between the Cardinals and the Cowboys, where the Cardinals are

0:50:42.640 --> 0:50:47.439
<v Speaker 1>now one and a half point dogs in this game, Um,

0:50:47.480 --> 0:50:51.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, Seattle shouldn't be three points. The other thing,

0:50:51.520 --> 0:50:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Seattle is undefeated, but good lord, I mean it's Russell

0:50:54.200 --> 0:50:58.480
<v Speaker 1>Wilson escape jobs as per usual, I'll say it's a

0:50:58.560 --> 0:51:01.760
<v Speaker 1>I'll split the difference between three in pick. I'll say Seattle,

0:51:01.800 --> 0:51:07.840
<v Speaker 1>mindus one and a half. Well, it's three with Juice

0:51:07.880 --> 0:51:10.520
<v Speaker 1>on the favorite, Sea Dogs being the favorite, and I

0:51:10.600 --> 0:51:13.440
<v Speaker 1>haven't hired net. You know my opinion of Russell Wilson,

0:51:13.719 --> 0:51:15.520
<v Speaker 1>and I do not want to go into Sunday's game

0:51:15.600 --> 0:51:18.080
<v Speaker 1>rooting against Russell Wilson because, first of all, I think

0:51:18.080 --> 0:51:21.440
<v Speaker 1>they I think the Cardinals lose tonight. So I mean,

0:51:21.480 --> 0:51:23.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm opening three and a half on this one. They

0:51:23.760 --> 0:51:25.759
<v Speaker 1>might jump in and take it because it's three with

0:51:26.760 --> 0:51:29.000
<v Speaker 1>Juice on the favorite. But I'm opening three and a half.

0:51:29.200 --> 0:51:31.920
<v Speaker 1>And uh, you know what you want to bet against? Run?

0:51:32.920 --> 0:51:35.560
<v Speaker 1>Please do that? Please? Because I'm so tired of rooting

0:51:35.600 --> 0:51:39.319
<v Speaker 1>against the sky every single week and usually getting my

0:51:39.840 --> 0:51:42.239
<v Speaker 1>handed to me at the end of the day. Well,

0:51:42.440 --> 0:51:45.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm with you. I like Seattle. I've said it many times.

0:51:45.440 --> 0:51:47.399
<v Speaker 1>I hate betting against Russell Wilson, but you know who else?

0:51:47.400 --> 0:51:50.080
<v Speaker 1>I hate betting against Kyler Murray too. That might be

0:51:50.120 --> 0:51:51.840
<v Speaker 1>my first play. That might be the first one I like.

0:51:51.920 --> 0:51:54.919
<v Speaker 1>Here on guessing lines Arizona against Sight unseen and played

0:51:55.000 --> 0:51:57.840
<v Speaker 1>yet they played tonight. But if it's more than three,

0:51:58.400 --> 0:52:01.560
<v Speaker 1>I'll grab the Cardinals for sure. In that one. They

0:52:01.560 --> 0:52:03.800
<v Speaker 1>will be on short rest though, as they played tonight.

0:52:04.000 --> 0:52:10.080
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's do one more here. Uh at the

0:52:10.160 --> 0:52:14.919
<v Speaker 1>Patriots the forty Niners. At the Patriots. Forty Niners win

0:52:15.040 --> 0:52:18.480
<v Speaker 1>last night. Uh. They beat the Rams by the score

0:52:18.480 --> 0:52:21.400
<v Speaker 1>of twenty four to sixteen as two point home dogs.

0:52:21.480 --> 0:52:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy g u gets in the game twenty three of

0:52:24.560 --> 0:52:29.200
<v Speaker 1>thirty three, three touchdowns, no picks, uh, no sacks, Kittle,

0:52:29.280 --> 0:52:31.680
<v Speaker 1>no surprise as biggest target seven for one O nine

0:52:31.680 --> 0:52:35.160
<v Speaker 1>and a touchdown. So San Francisco beats the Rams, probably

0:52:35.200 --> 0:52:39.360
<v Speaker 1>the fewest plays of a prime time NFL game I've watched,

0:52:39.520 --> 0:52:43.600
<v Speaker 1>quite frankly yet this year because the Dodgers and the

0:52:43.719 --> 0:52:46.160
<v Speaker 1>uh The Dodgers and the Braves had their Game seven

0:52:46.200 --> 0:52:48.480
<v Speaker 1>going last night, and I was far more invested in

0:52:48.560 --> 0:52:51.000
<v Speaker 1>that affair that I that I was in this football game,

0:52:51.080 --> 0:52:53.279
<v Speaker 1>if I'm just being honest. But I saw enough and

0:52:53.360 --> 0:52:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Jason was telling me, you saw the right play, which

0:52:55.080 --> 0:52:57.600
<v Speaker 1>was that Jared golf pick in the end zone when

0:52:57.600 --> 0:52:59.440
<v Speaker 1>it was twenty one to nine and the Rams had

0:52:59.440 --> 0:53:01.600
<v Speaker 1>a shot, and then he threw that pass in the

0:53:01.680 --> 0:53:04.520
<v Speaker 1>end zone. New England yesterday, this was the big one.

0:53:04.680 --> 0:53:07.920
<v Speaker 1>This is the biggest survivor lost yesterday. New England loses

0:53:07.960 --> 0:53:11.040
<v Speaker 1>to Denver and they lose to Denver by the score

0:53:11.200 --> 0:53:16.879
<v Speaker 1>of eighteen to twelve. Denver scored on their first six possessions,

0:53:17.520 --> 0:53:21.680
<v Speaker 1>all six Brandon McManus field goals, and those points held up.

0:53:22.480 --> 0:53:25.320
<v Speaker 1>New England ended up Cam's numbers. Cam was seventeen to

0:53:25.400 --> 0:53:28.080
<v Speaker 1>twenty five in the end for one fifty seven, but

0:53:28.120 --> 0:53:30.120
<v Speaker 1>he had gained seventy six yards on the ground on

0:53:30.160 --> 0:53:32.600
<v Speaker 1>ten carries with a touchdown, but he only threw, so

0:53:32.760 --> 0:53:34.920
<v Speaker 1>he ran for seventy six. He only threw for one

0:53:35.000 --> 0:53:40.479
<v Speaker 1>fifty seven. Edelman threw two passes on this final drift,

0:53:40.480 --> 0:53:42.640
<v Speaker 1>so here's the thing. In this game, it was eighteen

0:53:42.680 --> 0:53:45.200
<v Speaker 1>to twelve, and it was well, first of all, was

0:53:45.239 --> 0:53:47.800
<v Speaker 1>eighteen to nine, and then all of a sudden Drew

0:53:47.840 --> 0:53:50.280
<v Speaker 1>Lock and the Broncos decided, you know what, we're gonna

0:53:50.320 --> 0:53:53.080
<v Speaker 1>throw down field because that's what that's what you do.

0:53:53.320 --> 0:53:55.160
<v Speaker 1>Like if you had told me, are you the team

0:53:55.160 --> 0:53:56.919
<v Speaker 1>that's up eighteen and nine or the team that's down

0:53:56.960 --> 0:54:00.920
<v Speaker 1>eighteen to nine. So Lock throws two cans secutive picks

0:54:01.360 --> 0:54:04.240
<v Speaker 1>deep downfield. The first one leads to a New England

0:54:04.239 --> 0:54:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Patriots uh field goal that makes it eighteen to twelve.

0:54:06.800 --> 0:54:08.960
<v Speaker 1>The second one, you're like, are you kidding me? What

0:54:09.000 --> 0:54:11.840
<v Speaker 1>are you doing? Milk the clock? Make the mus their

0:54:11.880 --> 0:54:14.440
<v Speaker 1>time mounts win this. So the Patriots end up with

0:54:14.520 --> 0:54:16.920
<v Speaker 1>the ball and a chance to win, and you're like,

0:54:17.320 --> 0:54:19.760
<v Speaker 1>I can't believe this is happening. They go to two

0:54:19.920 --> 0:54:23.120
<v Speaker 1>Edelman trick plays. Edelman ends up two for two for

0:54:23.200 --> 0:54:26.359
<v Speaker 1>thirty eight yards, but in the end, the Broncos get

0:54:26.360 --> 0:54:29.640
<v Speaker 1>the stop and the Patriots lose three turnovers for the

0:54:29.640 --> 0:54:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Patriots in this game, so that we're minus one in

0:54:32.040 --> 0:54:35.000
<v Speaker 1>that department. Despite the Drew Lock picks late, it's the

0:54:35.040 --> 0:54:39.279
<v Speaker 1>Patriots worst start at two and three since two thousand one,

0:54:39.400 --> 0:54:43.480
<v Speaker 1>and get this, the first loss under Bill Belichick when

0:54:43.600 --> 0:54:49.800
<v Speaker 1>not allowing a touchdown? How about that um San Francisco

0:54:49.840 --> 0:54:51.840
<v Speaker 1>at in New England. Now this is gonna be interesting.

0:54:52.840 --> 0:54:54.439
<v Speaker 1>I was gonna say the first hour of this show

0:54:54.480 --> 0:54:57.640
<v Speaker 1>there wasn't much in terms of a line discrepancy. But

0:54:58.000 --> 0:54:59.759
<v Speaker 1>we've started out with a bang here in this one,

0:55:00.040 --> 0:55:04.800
<v Speaker 1>I'll say, I'll say New England minus three just because

0:55:04.840 --> 0:55:12.279
<v Speaker 1>they're the Patriots. Yeah, it's it's a little higher. I

0:55:12.320 --> 0:55:14.240
<v Speaker 1>see one, three and a half. A lot of juice

0:55:14.280 --> 0:55:18.000
<v Speaker 1>on the dog, mostly three juice on the favorite. So

0:55:18.040 --> 0:55:19.920
<v Speaker 1>you know at the south Point we open or we

0:55:20.040 --> 0:55:22.080
<v Speaker 1>do everything in eleven and tent, not just open, we

0:55:22.120 --> 0:55:24.800
<v Speaker 1>do everything in the eleven and tent. I'm opening three

0:55:24.920 --> 0:55:29.400
<v Speaker 1>flat and I again, well, first of all, my my

0:55:29.480 --> 0:55:31.520
<v Speaker 1>point of rings on the Niners have been like all

0:55:31.600 --> 0:55:34.880
<v Speaker 1>over the place because all the injuries they've had, including

0:55:34.880 --> 0:55:39.359
<v Speaker 1>Garoppolo but also a myriad of other players. But are

0:55:39.360 --> 0:55:44.480
<v Speaker 1>we sure the Patriots are any good? Yeah? And are

0:55:44.520 --> 0:55:48.839
<v Speaker 1>we now wondering? Are we now saying ourselves? Oh, this

0:55:48.920 --> 0:55:52.400
<v Speaker 1>is why nobody wanted to sign Cam Newton to an

0:55:52.440 --> 0:55:56.440
<v Speaker 1>exorbitant contract in the off season because he has not

0:55:56.520 --> 0:55:59.040
<v Speaker 1>looked good. He had one good game and when the opener,

0:55:59.080 --> 0:56:02.239
<v Speaker 1>and we thought it was the second coming, but he

0:56:02.280 --> 0:56:06.400
<v Speaker 1>has not looked very good since then. Uh to me, three,

0:56:07.400 --> 0:56:09.560
<v Speaker 1>three to me is a take. I would take three

0:56:09.560 --> 0:56:13.440
<v Speaker 1>with the forty Niners. I think this New England team

0:56:13.480 --> 0:56:16.360
<v Speaker 1>they're suffering from the same exact thing that they suffered

0:56:16.440 --> 0:56:19.799
<v Speaker 1>from last year. No skill position players to help a quarterback.

0:56:20.800 --> 0:56:24.560
<v Speaker 1>And last year they had Brady. This year, Uh, this

0:56:24.760 --> 0:56:28.920
<v Speaker 1>year they don't. They have Newton, who I think maybe

0:56:29.000 --> 0:56:31.759
<v Speaker 1>it's just a shell of themselves. So I think I

0:56:31.840 --> 0:56:33.759
<v Speaker 1>think three to me is a definite take for the

0:56:33.880 --> 0:56:37.560
<v Speaker 1>forty Niners. And I'm gonna open three, but it's it's

0:56:37.640 --> 0:56:39.560
<v Speaker 1>three with juice, so they'll probably lay it to me

0:56:39.600 --> 0:56:42.080
<v Speaker 1>and have that it. You're welcome to it. I was

0:56:42.160 --> 0:56:43.920
<v Speaker 1>really hoping you were going to tell me New England

0:56:43.960 --> 0:56:46.240
<v Speaker 1>was like a four and a half point favorite, because

0:56:46.280 --> 0:56:49.000
<v Speaker 1>that I just wanted there to be a New England bump.

0:56:49.120 --> 0:56:51.960
<v Speaker 1>But maybe there isn't one anymore after seeing that yesterday.

0:56:52.400 --> 0:56:55.640
<v Speaker 1>So three it is. By the way, it's it interesting

0:56:55.719 --> 0:56:57.600
<v Speaker 1>you keep saying, you know, are we sure this team

0:56:57.640 --> 0:56:59.440
<v Speaker 1>is good? Are we sure that team is good. That's

0:56:59.440 --> 0:57:02.800
<v Speaker 1>sort of been a theme on MSG plus on Primetime Action,

0:57:02.840 --> 0:57:05.200
<v Speaker 1>the show that I do UM with Matt Brown and

0:57:05.280 --> 0:57:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Danielle Ovary and Kelly Bidlin, where we do in game betting.

0:57:09.200 --> 0:57:11.120
<v Speaker 1>We talk now specifically in the a f C. We

0:57:11.160 --> 0:57:13.799
<v Speaker 1>get who's good. Kansas City is good, Baltimore is good,

0:57:14.280 --> 0:57:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Buffalo and Tennessee Pittsburgh as well. You can't really deny

0:57:17.040 --> 0:57:19.200
<v Speaker 1>that those are good football teams. Maybe maybe there's a

0:57:19.240 --> 0:57:21.000
<v Speaker 1>flaw here and there with them. Okay, none of them

0:57:21.000 --> 0:57:23.760
<v Speaker 1>are perfect, but those are good football teams. Can we

0:57:23.840 --> 0:57:26.800
<v Speaker 1>say there isn't a glaring flaw in any of the

0:57:26.960 --> 0:57:31.200
<v Speaker 1>NFC teams? Maybe Tampa Bay, maybe Tampa Bay's the best

0:57:31.240 --> 0:57:34.320
<v Speaker 1>of the bunch after what we saw yesterday, might be,

0:57:34.880 --> 0:57:36.680
<v Speaker 1>but like the rest of them, I just don't know

0:57:36.920 --> 0:57:39.960
<v Speaker 1>Green Bay's defense and that good. Certainly going back to

0:57:39.960 --> 0:57:43.439
<v Speaker 1>the a f C, certainly New England. Uh No, they're

0:57:43.440 --> 0:57:45.560
<v Speaker 1>not good at all. There's a lot of teams that are.

0:57:45.680 --> 0:57:47.400
<v Speaker 1>First of all, there's a lot of bad teams, right.

0:57:47.480 --> 0:57:49.360
<v Speaker 1>I used say this about baseball. The last three years,

0:57:49.480 --> 0:57:51.440
<v Speaker 1>the chasm between the halvens and the have nots have

0:57:51.600 --> 0:57:55.160
<v Speaker 1>widened increasingly every year. You're seeing guys you know who

0:57:55.160 --> 0:57:58.680
<v Speaker 1>aren't aces at minus two seventy and minus two eight

0:57:58.840 --> 0:58:02.280
<v Speaker 1>in games. We didn't see that three or four years ago. Football. Man,

0:58:02.280 --> 0:58:05.720
<v Speaker 1>there's so many bad teams. Um, I'm not saying New

0:58:05.720 --> 0:58:08.760
<v Speaker 1>England's one of them, but they're not good. So San

0:58:08.800 --> 0:58:11.360
<v Speaker 1>Francisco at New England, New England favored by three, and

0:58:11.400 --> 0:58:12.800
<v Speaker 1>I might be with you it might be a take

0:58:12.840 --> 0:58:15.520
<v Speaker 1>on the Niners from even at that number. What is next, sir?

0:58:15.560 --> 0:58:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Are we in the afternoon yet that game was? The

0:58:18.800 --> 0:58:21.120
<v Speaker 1>game was the afternoon? Sorry, I mean to skip. The

0:58:21.120 --> 0:58:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Titans game is in the morning, so it must be

0:58:23.240 --> 0:58:26.120
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the rotation because something Okay, that

0:58:26.240 --> 0:58:31.120
<v Speaker 1>no problem. What's next, Chris? This is an afternoon game,

0:58:31.400 --> 0:58:34.640
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City at Denver. Alright, Kansas City, we haven't seen

0:58:34.680 --> 0:58:37.800
<v Speaker 1>them play. They're playing Buffalo again this afternoon. Don't forget

0:58:38.280 --> 0:58:42.240
<v Speaker 1>five pm Eastern two pm Pacific for the Bills Chiefs

0:58:42.320 --> 0:58:44.600
<v Speaker 1>game today, and the Chiefs are five and a half

0:58:44.640 --> 0:58:46.920
<v Speaker 1>point favorites there. But as far as the Chiefs at

0:58:46.920 --> 0:58:50.440
<v Speaker 1>the Broncos, the Broncos in that win over the Patriots.

0:58:50.440 --> 0:58:56.520
<v Speaker 1>True luck ten of twenty No touchdowns. The two picks

0:58:56.560 --> 0:59:00.640
<v Speaker 1>I just mentioned sacked twice. So it wasn't that last

0:59:00.680 --> 0:59:03.080
<v Speaker 1>those last couple of sequences of of you know, those

0:59:03.120 --> 0:59:06.280
<v Speaker 1>last drives, he would have had a pretty you know,

0:59:06.680 --> 0:59:09.920
<v Speaker 1>clean game at least in terms of the turnovers, for sure,

0:59:09.960 --> 0:59:12.479
<v Speaker 1>at the very least. But he had picks with five

0:59:12.640 --> 0:59:14.640
<v Speaker 1>fifteen left in the game, up eighteen to nine, which

0:59:14.720 --> 0:59:16.400
<v Speaker 1>led to a field goal as I mentioned, and then

0:59:16.400 --> 0:59:20.280
<v Speaker 1>at eighteen to twelve another the next play from scrimmage

0:59:20.280 --> 0:59:24.280
<v Speaker 1>with three fourteen left, and then the defense holds up

0:59:24.320 --> 0:59:27.280
<v Speaker 1>with fifty eight seconds left, they finally stopped the Patriots.

0:59:27.640 --> 0:59:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Good Lord, Lindsay one oh one Tim Patrick four catches

0:59:32.000 --> 0:59:35.280
<v Speaker 1>for one oh one. The other thing about that game, Chrissie,

0:59:35.320 --> 0:59:38.760
<v Speaker 1>one other last note about Denver and New England, besides

0:59:39.000 --> 0:59:41.320
<v Speaker 1>the ridiculous lock picks, like, what are the Broncos doing?

0:59:41.520 --> 0:59:43.120
<v Speaker 1>Do you know how any penalties were called in that

0:59:43.120 --> 0:59:48.720
<v Speaker 1>whole game? Three three penalties? New England had one penalty

0:59:48.800 --> 0:59:53.120
<v Speaker 1>for four yards ned in that game. It's just amazing.

0:59:53.880 --> 0:59:56.680
<v Speaker 1>They really are just holding these uh these flags in

0:59:56.960 --> 0:59:59.440
<v Speaker 1>their pockets. And as I mentioned, the Broncos scored on

0:59:59.480 --> 1:00:02.160
<v Speaker 1>their first six possessions, but all were field goals. All

1:00:02.280 --> 1:00:05.360
<v Speaker 1>that said, again, barrying anything unforeseen tonight with the Chiefs.

1:00:05.640 --> 1:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs have got to be ten point favorites here, right,

1:00:09.840 --> 1:00:12.080
<v Speaker 1>I've seen anywhere between eight and a half and nine

1:00:12.080 --> 1:00:15.280
<v Speaker 1>and a half. My numbers come to eight and a half,

1:00:16.040 --> 1:00:17.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, Gil, I was looking through some of my

1:00:17.800 --> 1:00:21.520
<v Speaker 1>notes and when the Puncos were oh and three, let

1:00:21.520 --> 1:00:23.880
<v Speaker 1>me see who did they lose to. They lost to

1:00:24.920 --> 1:00:28.120
<v Speaker 1>the Titans, the Steelers in the Bucks. So all pretty

1:00:28.120 --> 1:00:31.800
<v Speaker 1>good teams. And really again except for the Buccaneers, had

1:00:31.800 --> 1:00:34.200
<v Speaker 1>really a pretty good showing against the other two I

1:00:34.240 --> 1:00:36.520
<v Speaker 1>had in my notes. I said, watch out for this team,

1:00:36.560 --> 1:00:38.560
<v Speaker 1>not that they are any good, but kind of the

1:00:38.560 --> 1:00:41.520
<v Speaker 1>way I thought about Cincinnati, a team that could be

1:00:41.560 --> 1:00:45.200
<v Speaker 1>a live dog covering a lot of numbers, and I'm

1:00:45.240 --> 1:00:48.200
<v Speaker 1>going to stick with that. Um Now, I don't want

1:00:48.200 --> 1:00:50.280
<v Speaker 1>to go too far off the number here because Kansas

1:00:50.280 --> 1:00:52.400
<v Speaker 1>City's always going to attract a lot of money. But

1:00:52.560 --> 1:00:54.480
<v Speaker 1>like I said, I see anywhere from eight half to

1:00:54.600 --> 1:00:56.400
<v Speaker 1>nine and a half. I'm not going in the middle

1:00:56.440 --> 1:01:01.200
<v Speaker 1>with a nine. Uh. And even though Kansas City it's

1:01:01.280 --> 1:01:03.880
<v Speaker 1>probably still the best team in the league, they're certainly

1:01:03.960 --> 1:01:05.760
<v Speaker 1>right up there. But I think Denver is going to

1:01:05.840 --> 1:01:08.760
<v Speaker 1>be that kind of team. Look out for them covering

1:01:08.840 --> 1:01:11.400
<v Speaker 1>some big numbers, and this is you know, nine, certainly

1:01:11.400 --> 1:01:15.160
<v Speaker 1>a big number, especially for home team, and I kind

1:01:15.200 --> 1:01:19.840
<v Speaker 1>of I'm not circling Kansas City yet, I mean Denver yet,

1:01:20.040 --> 1:01:22.280
<v Speaker 1>but I would keep an eye on them and watch

1:01:22.320 --> 1:01:24.360
<v Speaker 1>for them from here on in. Like I said, much

1:01:24.440 --> 1:01:28.280
<v Speaker 1>situation like Cincinnati. If you see him catching a big number,

1:01:28.640 --> 1:01:30.560
<v Speaker 1>take a second look at them, because I think they

1:01:30.640 --> 1:01:32.120
<v Speaker 1>might be worth a play and that, but they might

1:01:32.160 --> 1:01:33.760
<v Speaker 1>be worth a play in the spot too. You know

1:01:33.760 --> 1:01:36.320
<v Speaker 1>what my relationship with Drew lock is. I think I

1:01:36.480 --> 1:01:38.840
<v Speaker 1>underrated him to begin with, criminally, and now I think

1:01:38.880 --> 1:01:42.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm overrating him. I think that's I think that might

1:01:42.200 --> 1:01:45.720
<v Speaker 1>be the case with him. Well there's another guy can

1:01:45.800 --> 1:01:47.760
<v Speaker 1>use some good coaching, and I'm not sure he's getting

1:01:47.800 --> 1:01:51.520
<v Speaker 1>that in Denver. Yeah, yeah, you're right. That's gonna hold

1:01:51.560 --> 1:01:53.280
<v Speaker 1>them back. And I don't know what they were thinking.

1:01:53.280 --> 1:01:55.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, on a day when we're talking about Romeo

1:01:55.160 --> 1:01:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Crenell and Ron Rivera, I do not know what the

1:01:57.800 --> 1:02:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Broncos were thinking in the last stretch of that game

1:02:00.680 --> 1:02:04.600
<v Speaker 1>play to win. My goodness. We'll get to some more

1:02:04.920 --> 1:02:08.200
<v Speaker 1>lines to guess Week seven in the National Football League,

1:02:08.880 --> 1:02:11.280
<v Speaker 1>a whole bunch more to get to, including uh, the

1:02:11.320 --> 1:02:15.720
<v Speaker 1>primetime games as well. Well, we're jumping ahead here at

1:02:15.720 --> 1:02:19.320
<v Speaker 1>a prime time Okay, they're all over the place here,

1:02:19.440 --> 1:02:22.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, so you know, but we want to go

1:02:22.280 --> 1:02:24.800
<v Speaker 1>in rotation order and my correct Okay, sure we can

1:02:24.840 --> 1:02:28.200
<v Speaker 1>do it that way. Okay, al right. The Sunday night

1:02:28.240 --> 1:02:32.800
<v Speaker 1>came Tampa Bay at Las Vegas. All right, we talked

1:02:32.840 --> 1:02:35.960
<v Speaker 1>about Tampa Bay, big win for those of us who

1:02:35.960 --> 1:02:38.560
<v Speaker 1>had Tampa Bay. But they really they got players back,

1:02:38.600 --> 1:02:42.560
<v Speaker 1>They got Godwin back, specifically Tom Brady. Yesterday seventeen of

1:02:42.640 --> 1:02:45.640
<v Speaker 1>twenty seven for one sixty six. Didn't have to do

1:02:45.760 --> 1:02:48.600
<v Speaker 1>much once the defense got them under way. As as

1:02:48.600 --> 1:02:51.160
<v Speaker 1>we talked about earlier, the two the one pick six

1:02:51.720 --> 1:02:55.720
<v Speaker 1>and then the other interception consecutive consecutive drives for the Packers.

1:02:56.240 --> 1:02:59.160
<v Speaker 1>Four plays is all it took to have the two interceptions.

1:02:59.160 --> 1:03:00.560
<v Speaker 1>The next one was returned all the way to the

1:03:00.560 --> 1:03:03.040
<v Speaker 1>two yard line, and a ten to nothing Packers lead

1:03:03.520 --> 1:03:07.040
<v Speaker 1>was immediately reversed into a fourteen to ten Buccaneers lead.

1:03:07.480 --> 1:03:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Thirty eight straight for the Bucks. They went at thirty

1:03:10.360 --> 1:03:15.120
<v Speaker 1>eight to ten Ronald Jones second one thirteen with two touchdowns,

1:03:15.480 --> 1:03:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Gronk five for seventy eight and his first touchdown as

1:03:18.600 --> 1:03:24.520
<v Speaker 1>a Buccaneer. Good for Gronk. Tampa Bay no penalties for

1:03:24.640 --> 1:03:27.919
<v Speaker 1>no yards. How about that? You don't see that very often?

1:03:28.040 --> 1:03:31.680
<v Speaker 1>Zero penalties, zero yards for the Tampa Bay Buccaneers. We're

1:03:31.680 --> 1:03:33.640
<v Speaker 1>talking about only three penalties were called in the New

1:03:33.640 --> 1:03:36.640
<v Speaker 1>England uh Denver game, with New England getting one. Well,

1:03:36.640 --> 1:03:38.960
<v Speaker 1>how about a clean sheet from the Buccaneers and they're

1:03:38.960 --> 1:03:41.880
<v Speaker 1>playing the Raiders. The Raiders will come off a a

1:03:41.880 --> 1:03:43.920
<v Speaker 1>week of rest. They have a bye week this week.

1:03:44.280 --> 1:03:46.280
<v Speaker 1>We know that because Brent traveled all the way to

1:03:46.320 --> 1:03:48.200
<v Speaker 1>Montana for the bye week. He's like, I'm taking the

1:03:48.200 --> 1:03:50.760
<v Speaker 1>week off. Kind enough of Brent to do the megapod though,

1:03:50.960 --> 1:03:53.080
<v Speaker 1>So it'll be Tampa Bay at the at the Raiders

1:03:53.200 --> 1:03:56.360
<v Speaker 1>here at what is just that's listen the year of

1:03:57.080 --> 1:04:00.919
<v Speaker 1>and COVID what ah, What a sad for Raiders fans.

1:04:00.960 --> 1:04:03.120
<v Speaker 1>It would have loved to have had Tom Brady to

1:04:03.200 --> 1:04:07.040
<v Speaker 1>see at the brand new stadium. I'll say Tampa Bay,

1:04:07.080 --> 1:04:08.840
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be more than three. I'll say three and

1:04:08.840 --> 1:04:12.640
<v Speaker 1>a half Tampa Bay minus three and a half. Now

1:04:12.720 --> 1:04:16.560
<v Speaker 1>it's three with juice on the dog. So three is

1:04:17.200 --> 1:04:22.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna open three. My numbers four and a half

1:04:23.600 --> 1:04:25.040
<v Speaker 1>and my numbers are four and a half and no

1:04:25.200 --> 1:04:26.960
<v Speaker 1>home field. I think you have to give him a

1:04:27.000 --> 1:04:29.720
<v Speaker 1>little home field here, So I think the three sounds fine.

1:04:30.880 --> 1:04:32.640
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, a lot of respect for the Raiders. Like

1:04:32.680 --> 1:04:36.120
<v Speaker 1>I said, there's we do everything flat at the south point,

1:04:36.800 --> 1:04:38.880
<v Speaker 1>so we'll open it three flat. I'll probably bet me

1:04:38.920 --> 1:04:41.040
<v Speaker 1>the Raiders because I see it all three with juice

1:04:41.080 --> 1:04:43.240
<v Speaker 1>on the dog. Explain that to people who are tuning

1:04:43.280 --> 1:04:44.840
<v Speaker 1>in for the first time, Christie, Explain what you mean

1:04:44.880 --> 1:04:46.200
<v Speaker 1>by because they're like flat, What do you mean he

1:04:46.200 --> 1:04:49.080
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have half points? That's not what you mean. No,

1:04:49.200 --> 1:04:53.080
<v Speaker 1>we have that point. But we we do everything at

1:04:53.080 --> 1:04:55.440
<v Speaker 1>minus one ten or eleven at ten, however we want

1:04:55.480 --> 1:04:57.760
<v Speaker 1>to phrase that, we don't. We don't put you. We

1:04:57.800 --> 1:05:00.200
<v Speaker 1>don't use like three minus a ball or twenty or

1:05:00.080 --> 1:05:02.919
<v Speaker 1>or seven minus a dollar twenty or you know any

1:05:02.960 --> 1:05:05.960
<v Speaker 1>of that stuff. Everything is minus one tent, you know,

1:05:06.000 --> 1:05:09.000
<v Speaker 1>on the board for sides and totals. Now, first half,

1:05:09.040 --> 1:05:13.280
<v Speaker 1>second half, those we do some fanagal in there. But

1:05:13.320 --> 1:05:16.400
<v Speaker 1>as far as like the games themselves. No, everything is

1:05:16.440 --> 1:05:19.560
<v Speaker 1>minus one tent, everything, everything, everything, Keep making it as

1:05:19.600 --> 1:05:24.240
<v Speaker 1>simple as possible. And uh, Michael Gone and Frank Todi

1:05:24.320 --> 1:05:26.560
<v Speaker 1>has a longtime partner of insistent on it. And the

1:05:26.600 --> 1:05:30.440
<v Speaker 1>thing was, I don't resist it at all. And when

1:05:30.480 --> 1:05:32.880
<v Speaker 1>I was in Kelneva for twenty two years, I did

1:05:32.880 --> 1:05:35.160
<v Speaker 1>the exact same thing, you know. I mean they're re

1:05:35.320 --> 1:05:38.479
<v Speaker 1>used minus one tent. That's what the number is. And

1:05:40.000 --> 1:05:43.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, I know there's probably places where it fits

1:05:43.080 --> 1:05:45.919
<v Speaker 1>better or I don't blame them for doing that, but

1:05:46.280 --> 1:05:48.000
<v Speaker 1>for us, this is what we want to do because

1:05:48.040 --> 1:05:50.960
<v Speaker 1>we want to bring in you know, your everyday customer.

1:05:51.120 --> 1:05:55.160
<v Speaker 1>And it's very you know, it's not that complex. You know,

1:05:55.160 --> 1:05:57.160
<v Speaker 1>a game might go from three to three and a half,

1:05:57.160 --> 1:05:59.320
<v Speaker 1>but you are going to lay minus one tent. That

1:05:59.600 --> 1:06:02.480
<v Speaker 1>is a promise that we have here at the out point.

1:06:03.000 --> 1:06:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Say a couple of tweets here at beating the book.

1:06:04.560 --> 1:06:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Always appreciate the tweets. Adam Rosenberg Vrabel is absolutely the

1:06:09.040 --> 1:06:11.360
<v Speaker 1>best coach in the NFL. Remember how shrewd he was

1:06:11.400 --> 1:06:13.280
<v Speaker 1>on that delay of game penalty last year against the

1:06:13.280 --> 1:06:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Bats in the playoffs. Yeah, we discussed it this morning.

1:06:15.040 --> 1:06:18.840
<v Speaker 1>Adam uh, I Evan love this guy. This sort of

1:06:18.880 --> 1:06:21.200
<v Speaker 1>thing isn't happening without analytics. Yeah, well no, we went

1:06:21.200 --> 1:06:22.720
<v Speaker 1>through the whole delay of game thing and now it's

1:06:22.760 --> 1:06:27.520
<v Speaker 1>no longer permitted. Talking about Vrabel's intentional twelve men on

1:06:27.560 --> 1:06:30.680
<v Speaker 1>the field yesterday, which is the lesser of the two

1:06:30.720 --> 1:06:34.440
<v Speaker 1>things discussed from that game, the more discussing obviously being

1:06:34.560 --> 1:06:37.680
<v Speaker 1>Romeo Crenell's decision to go for two ups seven late

1:06:37.760 --> 1:06:41.320
<v Speaker 1>thirty six to twenty nine. Bainbridge DeWeese has this to

1:06:41.400 --> 1:06:45.400
<v Speaker 1>say about that, similar to Chrissy's question last week about

1:06:45.440 --> 1:06:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Russell Wilson. Do the analytics take into account that Derrick

1:06:49.080 --> 1:06:51.840
<v Speaker 1>Henry is on the other team. I think this is

1:06:51.840 --> 1:06:55.920
<v Speaker 1>Brainbridge talking. I think Romeo knew that if the Titans

1:06:55.960 --> 1:06:58.880
<v Speaker 1>did get the touchdown, the two point would be much

1:06:58.960 --> 1:07:04.280
<v Speaker 1>higher than fifty fifty. That's an interesting tweet. My response,

1:07:04.280 --> 1:07:06.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious what yours would be, Chrissy. My my response is,

1:07:07.480 --> 1:07:12.800
<v Speaker 1>I think we're giving Romeo too much credit with that. Bainbridge,

1:07:13.160 --> 1:07:14.960
<v Speaker 1>I know we mentioned him last. I think it was

1:07:15.040 --> 1:07:16.280
<v Speaker 1>last week on this show. It might have been two

1:07:16.320 --> 1:07:19.760
<v Speaker 1>weeks ago. I had a pretty observant tweet in that

1:07:19.920 --> 1:07:22.160
<v Speaker 1>regard to so that that's a pretty good one. But

1:07:22.200 --> 1:07:26.080
<v Speaker 1>I still think, yeah, listen, we're not ready to score

1:07:26.120 --> 1:07:27.640
<v Speaker 1>the two yet, he's still got to go down and

1:07:27.680 --> 1:07:30.280
<v Speaker 1>get a touchdown in the first place. That's right, you know.

1:07:30.320 --> 1:07:33.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm still yeah, yeah, we we aren't in a position

1:07:33.480 --> 1:07:36.680
<v Speaker 1>we're not automatically giving them six and then telling them

1:07:36.680 --> 1:07:38.920
<v Speaker 1>to go for two. And Romeo would have said that

1:07:38.960 --> 1:07:41.160
<v Speaker 1>because he was questioned on this after the game and

1:07:41.160 --> 1:07:42.680
<v Speaker 1>he said, no, I was just trying to put him

1:07:42.680 --> 1:07:44.520
<v Speaker 1>away basically, right, if you get to if you get

1:07:44.520 --> 1:07:48.800
<v Speaker 1>it to nine, you know, game set, match. Um, he

1:07:48.840 --> 1:07:50.600
<v Speaker 1>would have said. On top of that, at that moment,

1:07:50.640 --> 1:07:52.560
<v Speaker 1>he would have said, like, well, because I also thought that,

1:07:52.680 --> 1:07:55.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, Derrick Henry blah blah blah more than fifty

1:07:55.440 --> 1:07:57.480
<v Speaker 1>on two points. But it is an interesting tweet, Bainbridge,

1:07:57.480 --> 1:08:00.720
<v Speaker 1>and we thank you for bringing that up. Um, all right,

1:08:00.920 --> 1:08:02.560
<v Speaker 1>give me the matchup. I won't we won't have time

1:08:02.560 --> 1:08:03.960
<v Speaker 1>because we're gonna go to break. But what are the

1:08:04.000 --> 1:08:10.240
<v Speaker 1>matchups that are left. Jaguars at the Chargers, Steelers at

1:08:10.240 --> 1:08:15.000
<v Speaker 1>the Titans, Bears at the Rams on Monday night. That's like,

1:08:15.000 --> 1:08:16.519
<v Speaker 1>there's a couple of good ones at the end there,

1:08:17.160 --> 1:08:19.799
<v Speaker 1>including a battle of undefeateds between the Steelers and the Titans.

1:08:19.800 --> 1:08:21.639
<v Speaker 1>All right, we'll guess those lines and we'll talk about

1:08:21.680 --> 1:08:27.360
<v Speaker 1>what we like so far. I'm thinking Arizona. Oh, let's

1:08:27.360 --> 1:08:30.800
<v Speaker 1>see here, Arizona and San Francisco. I think I like

1:08:30.880 --> 1:08:32.920
<v Speaker 1>the best. Will will review all of it, Chris, He'll

1:08:32.960 --> 1:08:40.479
<v Speaker 1>give what he likes. Welcome back to a numbers game

1:08:40.760 --> 1:08:44.680
<v Speaker 1>with Jill Alexander Jason. I have a confession to make,

1:08:44.720 --> 1:08:46.679
<v Speaker 1>and I know that everybody's been waiting for this confession

1:08:46.720 --> 1:08:49.679
<v Speaker 1>for me. I love that Justin Bieber song on Saturday

1:08:49.720 --> 1:08:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Night Live. I think I like Justin Bieber, but it's

1:08:52.960 --> 1:08:54.720
<v Speaker 1>more Chance the Rapper. I think that wrote that song

1:08:54.840 --> 1:08:57.080
<v Speaker 1>Holy that he performed on Saturday Night Live. It's awesome.

1:08:57.120 --> 1:08:59.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna have to find it. Reminds me a chance

1:08:59.280 --> 1:09:01.360
<v Speaker 1>the Rappers us on Day Candy. I'm telling you, man,

1:09:02.320 --> 1:09:06.800
<v Speaker 1>good song. Chrissie. What do you know about Justin Bieber? Anything? Nothing? Nothing.

1:09:07.760 --> 1:09:09.679
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure you and I could be friends anymore.

1:09:09.680 --> 1:09:15.479
<v Speaker 1>I thought that might have some impact. Do you think

1:09:15.479 --> 1:09:17.040
<v Speaker 1>of all the things that have gone on in this

1:09:17.120 --> 1:09:19.040
<v Speaker 1>last week, that would be the thing that would send

1:09:19.040 --> 1:09:26.960
<v Speaker 1>it over that the it's awesome. Alright, three board games

1:09:27.000 --> 1:09:33.599
<v Speaker 1>to get to what you got. We all had a

1:09:33.640 --> 1:09:41.120
<v Speaker 1>good laugh. Yeah, Jaguars at the Chargers. Jaguars are one

1:09:41.120 --> 1:09:44.639
<v Speaker 1>in five. Jaguars lose to the Allions. As we talked about,

1:09:44.640 --> 1:09:49.160
<v Speaker 1>thirty four to sixteen minshoot four to forty three, one touchdown,

1:09:49.240 --> 1:09:51.880
<v Speaker 1>one pick, he was sacked once, Keelan Cole six catches

1:09:51.880 --> 1:09:55.160
<v Speaker 1>for one forty three. Jaguars only had forty four rushing yards,

1:09:55.479 --> 1:09:57.680
<v Speaker 1>only had the ball for twenty four oh three. It's

1:09:57.760 --> 1:10:00.360
<v Speaker 1>their worst start. That's saying something with the jack Wars.

1:10:00.960 --> 1:10:04.760
<v Speaker 1>One in five is the Jaguars worst start since they've

1:10:04.800 --> 1:10:08.800
<v Speaker 1>allowed thirty plus points in five straight games? Is that good?

1:10:09.920 --> 1:10:11.720
<v Speaker 1>And they're playing the Charges? Charges coming off a by

1:10:11.760 --> 1:10:13.679
<v Speaker 1>I'll say Chargers, who are one in four of themselves,

1:10:13.720 --> 1:10:15.559
<v Speaker 1>by the way, but we think of them quite differently

1:10:15.560 --> 1:10:17.960
<v Speaker 1>because they probably should have beaten the Saints, so they

1:10:18.000 --> 1:10:21.880
<v Speaker 1>should have beaten the Buccaneers. I'll say Chargers minus seven.

1:10:23.040 --> 1:10:27.439
<v Speaker 1>Am I low? You are low? It's anywhere from seven

1:10:27.479 --> 1:10:30.559
<v Speaker 1>and a half to eight and a half. I'm gonna

1:10:30.600 --> 1:10:32.519
<v Speaker 1>be at the eight and a half, you know, And

1:10:32.600 --> 1:10:35.960
<v Speaker 1>I know the Charges lost a couple of close games,

1:10:36.000 --> 1:10:39.040
<v Speaker 1>But justin Herbert, I think is just ready to explode.

1:10:39.840 --> 1:10:42.519
<v Speaker 1>And I think Jacksonville is ready to sink like a

1:10:42.640 --> 1:10:44.720
<v Speaker 1>rock the way we kind of thought they were in

1:10:44.760 --> 1:10:47.920
<v Speaker 1>the off season, and we let that first game out

1:10:47.960 --> 1:10:49.920
<v Speaker 1>of the blocks. We let that kind of change our

1:10:49.960 --> 1:10:53.479
<v Speaker 1>opinion on them. Uh. You know, the only reason when

1:10:53.479 --> 1:10:56.280
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about them more is because of the Jets

1:10:56.840 --> 1:10:59.320
<v Speaker 1>being as bad as they are. But I think Jacksonville

1:10:59.479 --> 1:11:02.200
<v Speaker 1>was in a race to the bottom. They'll probably finished

1:11:02.200 --> 1:11:03.840
<v Speaker 1>second of the Jets, but they're in a race to

1:11:03.880 --> 1:11:06.960
<v Speaker 1>the bottom. And I think this Charger team, you know,

1:11:07.000 --> 1:11:09.880
<v Speaker 1>I question they're coaching at times, but not the talent,

1:11:10.000 --> 1:11:11.639
<v Speaker 1>and I think this is the kind of game where

1:11:11.640 --> 1:11:15.800
<v Speaker 1>they could just absolutely explode, and I think they will. Uh.

1:11:15.960 --> 1:11:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Like I said, I see it anywhere from seven a

1:11:17.600 --> 1:11:19.120
<v Speaker 1>half to eight and a half. I'm using the eight

1:11:19.120 --> 1:11:21.240
<v Speaker 1>and a half. I like the highest number of possible. Yeah,

1:11:21.280 --> 1:11:23.479
<v Speaker 1>And you know what, you know how usually you often

1:11:23.520 --> 1:11:25.599
<v Speaker 1>say I like your number better than than this one.

1:11:25.920 --> 1:11:27.880
<v Speaker 1>I like your better number than mine. As soon as

1:11:27.920 --> 1:11:29.080
<v Speaker 1>it came out of my mouth, I was like, I

1:11:29.080 --> 1:11:31.599
<v Speaker 1>think I'm low because I think you're right. It should

1:11:31.600 --> 1:11:33.200
<v Speaker 1>be more than seven. So eight and a half from

1:11:33.240 --> 1:11:38.960
<v Speaker 1>Christie Chargers verus Jacksonville. All right, next, Okay, a good one,

1:11:39.040 --> 1:11:41.600
<v Speaker 1>maybe the best game of the week. Steelers at the

1:11:41.640 --> 1:11:46.080
<v Speaker 1>Titans five and oh versus five and oh Big Ben

1:11:46.280 --> 1:11:49.280
<v Speaker 1>in the Steelers route of the Browns yesterday, fourteen of

1:11:49.320 --> 1:11:51.920
<v Speaker 1>twenty two for one sixty two, one touchdown. Note Pixie

1:11:51.920 --> 1:11:54.800
<v Speaker 1>was sacked twice. James Conner carries one on one in

1:11:54.840 --> 1:11:58.400
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown. Claypool four for seventy four, also carried one

1:11:58.400 --> 1:12:01.320
<v Speaker 1>in the end zone on the ground. James Washington four

1:12:01.360 --> 1:12:04.160
<v Speaker 1>for six eight a touchdown. Bad news for the Steelers

1:12:04.160 --> 1:12:08.040
<v Speaker 1>though with Devin Bush their standout line yeah, feared to

1:12:08.080 --> 1:12:10.920
<v Speaker 1>have a significant knee injury. We will get the official

1:12:11.000 --> 1:12:13.920
<v Speaker 1>update here today And as far as Tennessee, we talked

1:12:13.920 --> 1:12:17.599
<v Speaker 1>about it ad nauseum, not only the Romeo Crenell decision

1:12:17.640 --> 1:12:19.720
<v Speaker 1>to go for two up thirty six to twenty nine,

1:12:19.760 --> 1:12:23.960
<v Speaker 1>but prior to that, Mike Vrabel with an intentional twelve

1:12:23.960 --> 1:12:27.320
<v Speaker 1>men on the field to basically save his team forty seconds,

1:12:28.400 --> 1:12:30.400
<v Speaker 1>so fourth and goal at the one and then fourth

1:12:30.400 --> 1:12:33.240
<v Speaker 1>and goal at the one. Uh. Again, we talked about

1:12:33.240 --> 1:12:35.000
<v Speaker 1>a Houston decides to go for it. That was the

1:12:35.000 --> 1:12:37.559
<v Speaker 1>proper move with one fifty three left Watson to Cook's touchdown,

1:12:37.600 --> 1:12:39.280
<v Speaker 1>but then they failed to get the two point conversion.

1:12:39.720 --> 1:12:43.280
<v Speaker 1>Eleven place seventies six yard, one minute, forty one second

1:12:43.360 --> 1:12:45.880
<v Speaker 1>drive for the Titans that ended with tanneh Hill to

1:12:45.960 --> 1:12:48.680
<v Speaker 1>Brown seven yard score. They win the coin flipp in

1:12:48.800 --> 1:12:51.080
<v Speaker 1>overtime because of course they do, and then on the

1:12:51.120 --> 1:12:53.800
<v Speaker 1>second play tanne Hill to Henry fifty three yards four

1:12:53.800 --> 1:12:57.120
<v Speaker 1>plays later, Henry crashes in from the five ballgame forty

1:12:57.360 --> 1:13:00.920
<v Speaker 1>to thirty six. Fourth win this season by the Titans,

1:13:01.840 --> 1:13:08.000
<v Speaker 1>Chrissy by six points or fewer. They're living right. Tannehill

1:13:08.040 --> 1:13:10.920
<v Speaker 1>thirty of forty one for three sixty four, four touchdowns,

1:13:10.920 --> 1:13:14.839
<v Speaker 1>one pick, two sacks, Henry twenty two for two twelve

1:13:14.920 --> 1:13:17.879
<v Speaker 1>and two touchdowns and then two catches for fifty two

1:13:18.200 --> 1:13:21.639
<v Speaker 1>included in that two d twelve yards rushing a ninety

1:13:21.760 --> 1:13:26.240
<v Speaker 1>four yards signature Derrick Henry touchdown scamper with nine thirty

1:13:26.280 --> 1:13:28.280
<v Speaker 1>seven left in the fourth quarter to put Tennessee up

1:13:28.320 --> 1:13:30.839
<v Speaker 1>twenty seven and twenty three in what was a topsy

1:13:30.880 --> 1:13:34.400
<v Speaker 1>turvy fourth quarter. Anthony Firkser eight catches for one thirteen

1:13:34.439 --> 1:13:38.959
<v Speaker 1>and touchdown six hundred and one total yards of offense

1:13:39.000 --> 1:13:42.160
<v Speaker 1>for the Titans. It's a franchise record, including to sixty

1:13:42.200 --> 1:13:44.759
<v Speaker 1>three on the ground. You know, Houston had four twelve

1:13:45.120 --> 1:13:47.400
<v Speaker 1>and they got out gained by almost two hundred yards.

1:13:47.640 --> 1:13:50.200
<v Speaker 1>It's the second five and oh starting franchise history for

1:13:50.240 --> 1:13:52.400
<v Speaker 1>the Titans. Two thousand eight was the last time. They

1:13:52.479 --> 1:13:55.639
<v Speaker 1>also may have some bad news. We have that tweet

1:13:55.920 --> 1:14:00.439
<v Speaker 1>Jason Dewey Taylor Luanne uh, their standout left tackle. He

1:14:01.560 --> 1:14:05.720
<v Speaker 1>uh could have a major, major injury as well. Here

1:14:05.720 --> 1:14:07.880
<v Speaker 1>it is from Chris Mortenson, the mort Report Titans starting

1:14:07.960 --> 1:14:09.920
<v Speaker 1>left tackle Taylor Win. We'll have an m R I

1:14:10.040 --> 1:14:12.280
<v Speaker 1>on Monday morning to determine if he indeed suffered to

1:14:12.280 --> 1:14:14.880
<v Speaker 1>torn a c L that team physicians diagnosed early in

1:14:14.880 --> 1:14:18.320
<v Speaker 1>the Titans Texans game, as Jay Glazer reported earlier this evening.

1:14:18.320 --> 1:14:21.800
<v Speaker 1>This is from More yesterday. So um wins for both

1:14:21.800 --> 1:14:24.080
<v Speaker 1>the Steelers and the Titans, but both teams might have

1:14:24.120 --> 1:14:28.519
<v Speaker 1>lost somebody key. I'll tell you, I don't know how you.

1:14:29.680 --> 1:14:31.960
<v Speaker 1>I never have guessed pick ums this year, but this

1:14:32.000 --> 1:14:34.240
<v Speaker 1>is kind of a pick um to me. I'll say,

1:14:34.240 --> 1:14:39.320
<v Speaker 1>pick them. Well, I like your number better. I see it,

1:14:39.400 --> 1:14:43.320
<v Speaker 1>I see the Pittsburgh I see Pittsburgh favorite anywhere from

1:14:43.320 --> 1:14:45.519
<v Speaker 1>one and a half to two and a half. I

1:14:45.520 --> 1:14:49.360
<v Speaker 1>gotta tell you, I my numbers, come to pick them myself,

1:14:49.640 --> 1:14:52.320
<v Speaker 1>and uh, I'm sure all you're from the Black and

1:14:52.360 --> 1:14:57.759
<v Speaker 1>goal out there. Tell me the power of negative thinking. Chris,

1:14:57.760 --> 1:15:00.600
<v Speaker 1>thanks a lot, you know, but think this game is

1:15:00.600 --> 1:15:02.840
<v Speaker 1>a real legitimate pick. That that's a big injury though

1:15:02.840 --> 1:15:05.639
<v Speaker 1>it left tackle for the Titans because you know they're

1:15:05.640 --> 1:15:08.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna they're gonna have to pressure Tannehill and they're gonna

1:15:08.760 --> 1:15:11.720
<v Speaker 1>have to obviously stop their wrong with Derrick Henry. I

1:15:11.760 --> 1:15:13.720
<v Speaker 1>made a little note here for guys. Some of you

1:15:13.800 --> 1:15:17.439
<v Speaker 1>young guys out there might not remember Eric Dickerson. Uh,

1:15:17.600 --> 1:15:19.559
<v Speaker 1>kind of a forgotten running back, but a guy who

1:15:19.600 --> 1:15:22.120
<v Speaker 1>had two thousand yards one year, you know, a Hall

1:15:22.160 --> 1:15:24.760
<v Speaker 1>of Fame running back. Derrick Henry reminds me a little

1:15:24.800 --> 1:15:26.800
<v Speaker 1>bit of Eric Dickerson. So if you want to get

1:15:26.800 --> 1:15:29.040
<v Speaker 1>some film equips that Eric Dickerson, go take a look

1:15:29.040 --> 1:15:32.519
<v Speaker 1>at him. I'm not ready to put Henry above Dickerson yet,

1:15:32.560 --> 1:15:34.559
<v Speaker 1>but it's kind of that style of the running back

1:15:34.800 --> 1:15:38.640
<v Speaker 1>and I'm both are terrific, but I uh this to

1:15:38.680 --> 1:15:40.280
<v Speaker 1>me to pick the games, So I'm gonna open one

1:15:40.280 --> 1:15:42.160
<v Speaker 1>and a half just because I see it as high

1:15:42.200 --> 1:15:44.679
<v Speaker 1>as two and a half out there, So I'm gonna

1:15:44.720 --> 1:15:46.760
<v Speaker 1>open one and a half. And they'll probably been to

1:15:46.800 --> 1:15:49.519
<v Speaker 1>the Steelers and puts some come Sunday morning, I'm sure

1:15:49.520 --> 1:15:52.280
<v Speaker 1>I'll be rooting for the Steelers, But money wise, I

1:15:52.320 --> 1:15:55.000
<v Speaker 1>think this game should be a pick. I hope people

1:15:55.000 --> 1:15:57.160
<v Speaker 1>haven't forgotten about Eric Dickerson. But you know what, that's

1:15:57.160 --> 1:16:02.840
<v Speaker 1>a great comparison. Derrick Henry is a bigger version of

1:16:02.920 --> 1:16:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Dickerson in the sense that they both ran upright right.

1:16:07.400 --> 1:16:11.720
<v Speaker 1>They both ran up tall and have a surprisingly unbelievable

1:16:11.840 --> 1:16:15.600
<v Speaker 1>north south speed. Not not guys who will who go

1:16:15.640 --> 1:16:18.160
<v Speaker 1>in different directions quickly, but when they get out in

1:16:18.200 --> 1:16:20.080
<v Speaker 1>the field and you're like, oh, this guy will get caught.

1:16:20.439 --> 1:16:22.840
<v Speaker 1>And it was amazing how they would never get caught.

1:16:22.880 --> 1:16:24.559
<v Speaker 1>Both of these guys. You're like, how is Derrick Henry

1:16:24.560 --> 1:16:26.240
<v Speaker 1>going to get to the house at that size? It

1:16:26.320 --> 1:16:28.280
<v Speaker 1>was the same with Dickerson, except for that time that

1:16:28.360 --> 1:16:30.639
<v Speaker 1>Darryl Green ran him down, But he ran down everybody,

1:16:30.680 --> 1:16:36.320
<v Speaker 1>all right. One more, what do you got? Bears at

1:16:36.360 --> 1:16:38.960
<v Speaker 1>the Rams? Bears at the Rams five and one, Verses

1:16:38.960 --> 1:16:42.400
<v Speaker 1>four and two. The Bears are five and one. Payer Tiger,

1:16:42.439 --> 1:16:44.719
<v Speaker 1>I guess, but man, there's still five and one folds

1:16:44.800 --> 1:16:46.760
<v Speaker 1>yesterday and the win against the Panthers twenty three or

1:16:46.800 --> 1:16:51.200
<v Speaker 1>thirty nine, one touchdown to pick sacked zero times, only

1:16:51.200 --> 1:16:53.960
<v Speaker 1>two d sixty one total yards of offense for the Bears,

1:16:54.640 --> 1:16:57.080
<v Speaker 1>UH ten penalties for ninety two yards. They got to

1:16:57.080 --> 1:16:59.200
<v Speaker 1>clean that up, but they were plus two in turnovers

1:16:59.400 --> 1:17:01.080
<v Speaker 1>and at five and one, that's the best start for

1:17:01.080 --> 1:17:05.280
<v Speaker 1>the Chicago Bears. Brent Musburger said it on our podcast

1:17:05.280 --> 1:17:07.000
<v Speaker 1>on the megapod the other day. He was like, because

1:17:07.000 --> 1:17:08.559
<v Speaker 1>a couple of us had the Panthers, he was like,

1:17:08.640 --> 1:17:10.960
<v Speaker 1>be aware of that Bears defense. And he did it

1:17:11.000 --> 1:17:13.560
<v Speaker 1>in that Brent voice, so it had much more gravitas

1:17:13.600 --> 1:17:17.160
<v Speaker 1>than it otherwise would have the Rams yesterday lose. As

1:17:17.160 --> 1:17:20.840
<v Speaker 1>we mentioned to the to the Niners golf nineteen thirty eight,

1:17:21.680 --> 1:17:26.080
<v Speaker 1>two touchdowns a pick, uh sacked zero times. But again

1:17:26.080 --> 1:17:28.280
<v Speaker 1>when they were down twenty one to nine, they were

1:17:28.360 --> 1:17:30.120
<v Speaker 1>knocking at the door and then he threw that pick

1:17:30.120 --> 1:17:32.160
<v Speaker 1>on fourth down, and that was kind of it for

1:17:32.320 --> 1:17:36.639
<v Speaker 1>the Rams. That was their most credible chance in that

1:17:36.680 --> 1:17:38.880
<v Speaker 1>ball game yesterday. I will say the Rams will be

1:17:38.960 --> 1:17:41.320
<v Speaker 1>favored here though for all the reasons we stated about

1:17:41.320 --> 1:17:43.160
<v Speaker 1>the Bears time and time again, how so many of

1:17:43.160 --> 1:17:45.479
<v Speaker 1>those wins could have just as easily been lost as

1:17:45.760 --> 1:17:48.840
<v Speaker 1>though not yesterday. So I'll say the Rams, and I'll

1:17:48.880 --> 1:17:53.679
<v Speaker 1>make it as high as six. How about that it's

1:17:53.840 --> 1:17:57.320
<v Speaker 1>five and a half and six a little more five

1:17:57.400 --> 1:17:59.240
<v Speaker 1>and a half. I like the five and a half

1:17:59.280 --> 1:18:02.360
<v Speaker 1>a little better. The total here we're looking at his

1:18:02.479 --> 1:18:05.280
<v Speaker 1>forty six, which a decade ago would have been a

1:18:05.360 --> 1:18:07.880
<v Speaker 1>high total. Now it's one of the lowest totals on

1:18:07.920 --> 1:18:11.639
<v Speaker 1>the board for the Sunday's games. I'm trying to think.

1:18:11.680 --> 1:18:16.200
<v Speaker 1>I think it's the second lowest total. Uh So I

1:18:16.240 --> 1:18:19.000
<v Speaker 1>think that this should be a pretty close game. So

1:18:19.000 --> 1:18:20.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna stick with the five and a half here.

1:18:22.080 --> 1:18:24.600
<v Speaker 1>But I you know, what Brent says is true that

1:18:24.760 --> 1:18:28.040
<v Speaker 1>bare defense is really really good now the Rams. I

1:18:28.040 --> 1:18:29.839
<v Speaker 1>know you've talked a couple of times about that interception

1:18:29.840 --> 1:18:32.759
<v Speaker 1>in the end zone. That kid for San Francisco actually

1:18:32.760 --> 1:18:34.639
<v Speaker 1>had his name. I know he's bounced around a little bit.

1:18:35.240 --> 1:18:39.360
<v Speaker 1>He made an unbelievable play. That was a great interception.

1:18:40.000 --> 1:18:42.360
<v Speaker 1>So I mean, I'm the one to not fallt Golf

1:18:42.360 --> 1:18:44.320
<v Speaker 1>because he should have read the defense a little bit better.

1:18:44.479 --> 1:18:46.600
<v Speaker 1>But that kid made a fantastic play. But it was

1:18:46.640 --> 1:18:49.200
<v Speaker 1>fourth down. I mean, golf had to throw the ball

1:18:49.200 --> 1:18:51.400
<v Speaker 1>in the end zone. I mean, you know, no sense

1:18:51.439 --> 1:18:55.400
<v Speaker 1>in uh throwing it away or anything else, and he

1:18:55.439 --> 1:18:58.280
<v Speaker 1>didn't have a safe place to go. But I think

1:18:58.280 --> 1:19:00.160
<v Speaker 1>the Rams still look pretty good. I think they do.

1:19:00.240 --> 1:19:01.840
<v Speaker 1>But I like the lower number here just because I

1:19:01.880 --> 1:19:04.920
<v Speaker 1>think it's going to be a fairly low scoring game. Yeah,

1:19:04.920 --> 1:19:07.000
<v Speaker 1>I think you're talking about Jason Varette also the Niners.

1:19:07.040 --> 1:19:09.720
<v Speaker 1>That's who it was, Jason Jason Barrett. I'm sorry, Yeah, no,

1:19:09.760 --> 1:19:11.880
<v Speaker 1>that's okay. So what I like best in the end

1:19:11.920 --> 1:19:15.240
<v Speaker 1>is I think I like San Francisco at New England.

1:19:16.120 --> 1:19:20.439
<v Speaker 1>What was your number there again? Three? Yeah, I think

1:19:20.439 --> 1:19:23.680
<v Speaker 1>I like, if you give me the hook, I like

1:19:23.720 --> 1:19:27.280
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco. I think I like Arizona against Seattle. And

1:19:27.360 --> 1:19:30.080
<v Speaker 1>you know what, Chrissie, if Buffaloes only ten against the Jets,

1:19:30.200 --> 1:19:33.840
<v Speaker 1>I may lay the ten. How about you? Well, what's

1:19:33.880 --> 1:19:35.880
<v Speaker 1>the leven in my place? I can tell you that

1:19:36.120 --> 1:19:41.040
<v Speaker 1>I like Carolina getting over seven. I like San Francisco

1:19:41.520 --> 1:19:43.439
<v Speaker 1>and we're going to head to head. I like Seattle

1:19:43.479 --> 1:19:48.200
<v Speaker 1>over Abo. That's why we do this. Chrissie, thank you

1:19:48.240 --> 1:19:53.040
<v Speaker 1>as always, I appreciate it, my pleasure. Chris Andrew's, everybody

1:19:53.040 --> 1:19:55.720
<v Speaker 1>at Andrews Sports, thanks for listening. Good luck with all

1:19:55.720 --> 1:19:57.960
<v Speaker 1>your bets, Enjoy the double header and football tonight. From

1:19:57.960 --> 1:20:00.719
<v Speaker 1>all of us at BESA, the Sports Betting Network book

1:20:01.800 --> 1:20:10.719
<v Speaker 1>Dababa ba baba bot ban dababaa baba