WEBVTT - What's Gone Wrong at Thames Water and What Could Be Next

0:00:03.520 --> 0:00:09.320
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:10.760 --> 0:00:12.680
<v Speaker 2>If you think about the consequences that we've all been

0:00:12.720 --> 0:00:14.880
<v Speaker 2>living with, it's such a unique story, isn't it. You've

0:00:14.880 --> 0:00:18.480
<v Speaker 2>got on the one hand, it's about a company in distress,

0:00:18.520 --> 0:00:21.239
<v Speaker 2>so far, so normal, but it's also about you know,

0:00:21.360 --> 0:00:23.799
<v Speaker 2>we use its water. You've got the boat race the

0:00:23.800 --> 0:00:26.239
<v Speaker 2>other day where the rowers were all some of them

0:00:26.239 --> 0:00:28.200
<v Speaker 2>were real. They were told not to go in the water,

0:00:28.280 --> 0:00:32.280
<v Speaker 2>which is very, very unusual. When I send my kids

0:00:32.280 --> 0:00:34.640
<v Speaker 2>into the sea, I do wonder if they'll get sick.

0:00:35.000 --> 0:00:37.080
<v Speaker 2>And I remember being in government and saying to someone

0:00:37.840 --> 0:00:41.199
<v Speaker 2>speed now two years ago, you know, would you swim

0:00:41.840 --> 0:00:43.280
<v Speaker 2>and they said, I'd be very careful.

0:00:43.920 --> 0:00:44.880
<v Speaker 1>This is the thing.

0:00:44.920 --> 0:00:47.400
<v Speaker 3>You've kind of got the public side of it, which

0:00:47.440 --> 0:00:51.800
<v Speaker 3>is sewage and leaks and people literally having sewage spills

0:00:51.800 --> 0:00:53.519
<v Speaker 3>in their kitchens and being told it's because they put

0:00:53.600 --> 0:00:55.920
<v Speaker 3>nappies in the toilet and they don't even have children.

0:00:56.920 --> 0:00:58.160
<v Speaker 1>And then you've got this.

0:00:59.680 --> 0:01:04.840
<v Speaker 3>Very very complicated financial structures and extremely complicated regulation because

0:01:04.880 --> 0:01:07.160
<v Speaker 3>these are privatized monopolies.

0:01:09.400 --> 0:01:12.000
<v Speaker 2>From Bloomberg Studios in the heart of the square mile.

0:01:12.120 --> 0:01:13.039
<v Speaker 4>This is in the city.

0:01:13.240 --> 0:01:17.520
<v Speaker 2>Our weekly look at the conversations motivating powerbrokers, policymakers and

0:01:17.600 --> 0:01:22.040
<v Speaker 2>financiers the world over. I'm alegra Stratton. Francine and Dave

0:01:22.080 --> 0:01:24.720
<v Speaker 2>are both away on holiday this week. I'm not bitter,

0:01:25.360 --> 0:01:29.680
<v Speaker 2>so I've instead asked my fellow associate editor and Readout

0:01:29.680 --> 0:01:33.640
<v Speaker 2>author Alva Ray to make her podcast debut this morning. Alva,

0:01:33.720 --> 0:01:35.480
<v Speaker 2>you were writing yesterday, what did you do in the

0:01:35.520 --> 0:01:35.959
<v Speaker 2>read app?

0:01:36.400 --> 0:01:36.919
<v Speaker 4>I did?

0:01:37.600 --> 0:01:40.320
<v Speaker 5>Rachel Reeves in Lightintinhart. She's going to fund some of

0:01:40.360 --> 0:01:44.119
<v Speaker 5>her manifesto pledges after Jeremy Hunt nicked there.

0:01:43.959 --> 0:01:45.280
<v Speaker 1>In Nondo holicy.

0:01:45.480 --> 0:01:46.200
<v Speaker 4>What's the answer.

0:01:47.120 --> 0:01:51.200
<v Speaker 5>I Cracking down on tax dodgers is the plan. Whether

0:01:51.200 --> 0:01:54.080
<v Speaker 5>that will actually work is less certain, but they're hoping

0:01:54.120 --> 0:01:57.080
<v Speaker 5>that they can squeeze an extra five billion by doing that.

0:01:57.680 --> 0:01:59.720
<v Speaker 2>But both of us have written about Thames Water. I

0:01:59.760 --> 0:02:02.880
<v Speaker 2>think I did it last week. I can't remember all.

0:02:02.800 --> 0:02:05.680
<v Speaker 4>Me sinto one your pieces too.

0:02:05.840 --> 0:02:10.600
<v Speaker 2>So we're joined by Jess Shankleman, who is Pillenberg's guru

0:02:10.880 --> 0:02:13.520
<v Speaker 2>on all things Thames Water. Jess, you were given the

0:02:13.560 --> 0:02:15.680
<v Speaker 2>beat about six months ago when he came back from

0:02:15.680 --> 0:02:16.920
<v Speaker 2>Matt leave, won't you Yes?

0:02:17.320 --> 0:02:19.480
<v Speaker 3>I came back from Matt leave and was told yeah,

0:02:19.560 --> 0:02:21.400
<v Speaker 3>you know you're going to be covering Thames water now.

0:02:21.440 --> 0:02:23.560
<v Speaker 3>But prior to that, I was doing a lot on climate,

0:02:23.600 --> 0:02:27.080
<v Speaker 3>which I still do when I have a second And

0:02:27.120 --> 0:02:28.919
<v Speaker 3>it was kind of a weird moment because I came

0:02:28.919 --> 0:02:32.120
<v Speaker 3>back around August September and the crisis from last year.

0:02:32.160 --> 0:02:34.880
<v Speaker 3>There's Thames water crisis last year where they almost went

0:02:34.880 --> 0:02:40.520
<v Speaker 3>into special administration was subsiding and I just thought it

0:02:40.639 --> 0:02:43.079
<v Speaker 3>was really quiet, and Rachel Morrison, my boss, was saying, no,

0:02:43.120 --> 0:02:43.880
<v Speaker 3>it's going to blow up again.

0:02:43.880 --> 0:02:44.679
<v Speaker 1>It's going to blowup again.

0:02:44.760 --> 0:02:46.119
<v Speaker 4>You didn't think it was a big assignment.

0:02:47.760 --> 0:02:50.560
<v Speaker 3>I was kind of like, Oh, I'm writing about rest

0:02:50.880 --> 0:02:52.880
<v Speaker 3>what's going on with these reservoirs in Oxfordshire?

0:02:53.000 --> 0:02:56.960
<v Speaker 1>And they kept talking about debt and gearing and I

0:02:57.040 --> 0:03:00.359
<v Speaker 1>was like, oh God, I don't know all this stuffed too.

0:03:01.360 --> 0:03:03.000
<v Speaker 3>And then I so sort of spent the last six

0:03:03.040 --> 0:03:05.200
<v Speaker 3>months going to conferences and trying to embed myself in

0:03:05.240 --> 0:03:07.680
<v Speaker 3>the water industry, which is very small and.

0:03:07.760 --> 0:03:09.120
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of revolving doors.

0:03:09.120 --> 0:03:12.400
<v Speaker 3>Everyone's worked everywhere and just trying to work out what

0:03:12.560 --> 0:03:14.880
<v Speaker 3>is going to happen with Thames. At the end of November,

0:03:14.919 --> 0:03:18.760
<v Speaker 3>my colleague Phil Oldrich wrote story saying Kemball, which is

0:03:18.760 --> 0:03:20.520
<v Speaker 3>a parent company of Thames, might run out of.

0:03:20.919 --> 0:03:24.720
<v Speaker 1>Run out of money, not run out of water and loan.

0:03:24.800 --> 0:03:27.400
<v Speaker 2>Behold they have So that was the key moment November

0:03:27.560 --> 0:03:28.120
<v Speaker 2>four months ago.

0:03:28.320 --> 0:03:29.079
<v Speaker 1>Well it was there.

0:03:29.400 --> 0:03:31.760
<v Speaker 3>It was the end of their annual report which came late,

0:03:32.680 --> 0:03:34.920
<v Speaker 3>and the auditors warned that there was a possibility they

0:03:34.960 --> 0:03:37.200
<v Speaker 3>might run out of money in April, which is where

0:03:37.240 --> 0:03:37.480
<v Speaker 3>we are.

0:03:38.400 --> 0:03:40.240
<v Speaker 2>So yes, give us, give us the sort of most

0:03:40.240 --> 0:03:41.560
<v Speaker 2>relevant aspects of the story.

0:03:41.720 --> 0:03:43.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so, I mean I just to go back a

0:03:43.240 --> 0:03:44.400
<v Speaker 1>couple of days. That is what happened.

0:03:44.400 --> 0:03:47.000
<v Speaker 3>At the end of last week. Kemball effectively defaulted on

0:03:47.040 --> 0:03:50.240
<v Speaker 3>its loans. So Kemball is the parent company of Thames Water.

0:03:50.640 --> 0:03:53.320
<v Speaker 3>That doesn't mean that Thames is defaulted on its loans.

0:03:53.360 --> 0:03:59.920
<v Speaker 3>Thames is still operating. We reported that Kemble's owners, that

0:04:00.440 --> 0:04:04.040
<v Speaker 3>nine different shareholders of this company, which is basically an

0:04:04.040 --> 0:04:09.760
<v Speaker 3>investment vehicle, begged Steve Barkley, the Environment Secretary, please step

0:04:09.800 --> 0:04:13.280
<v Speaker 3>in and help with this process with the regulator. They're

0:04:13.320 --> 0:04:15.560
<v Speaker 3>not giving us what we want. And he came back

0:04:15.600 --> 0:04:18.640
<v Speaker 3>and said nope, this is not for me to deal with.

0:04:19.480 --> 0:04:20.360
<v Speaker 1>So we.

0:04:21.600 --> 0:04:24.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well, the government do not want to step in

0:04:24.360 --> 0:04:26.680
<v Speaker 3>and have this on their hands. It's a massive depth

0:04:26.720 --> 0:04:28.080
<v Speaker 3>pole that they have to deal with, if so.

0:04:28.680 --> 0:04:31.919
<v Speaker 5>And that's what our government team has really been reporting

0:04:31.920 --> 0:04:34.560
<v Speaker 5>for the past few weeks that Richie Sunak just you know,

0:04:34.600 --> 0:04:37.400
<v Speaker 5>wants to wash his hands off this. But until you

0:04:37.600 --> 0:04:41.440
<v Speaker 5>reported that, you know, Steve Barkley formally rejected this plea

0:04:41.520 --> 0:04:43.320
<v Speaker 5>for help. I suppose it was just vibes that we

0:04:43.320 --> 0:04:44.000
<v Speaker 5>were reporting.

0:04:44.120 --> 0:04:48.440
<v Speaker 3>Yes, so the government has updated it's special administration legislation

0:04:48.520 --> 0:04:50.400
<v Speaker 3>for water companies, so they did that at the beginning

0:04:50.400 --> 0:04:54.480
<v Speaker 3>of this year, and basically having done that, they hope

0:04:54.520 --> 0:04:56.520
<v Speaker 3>to be able to sit back and just let this

0:04:56.640 --> 0:04:59.120
<v Speaker 3>play out. If terms was brought into special administration, it

0:04:59.200 --> 0:05:02.000
<v Speaker 3>kind of creates like a repackage off the shelf model

0:05:02.000 --> 0:05:03.680
<v Speaker 3>that you can then break them up and sell them

0:05:03.800 --> 0:05:06.640
<v Speaker 3>if you need to, whereas prior to that, it was

0:05:06.680 --> 0:05:09.040
<v Speaker 3>all this kind of old nineteen nineties legislation that made

0:05:09.080 --> 0:05:10.240
<v Speaker 3>everything very complicated.

0:05:10.320 --> 0:05:12.479
<v Speaker 1>So they've just got their ducks in a row.

0:05:12.920 --> 0:05:14.440
<v Speaker 4>But just let's just look at that for a second.

0:05:14.440 --> 0:05:16.520
<v Speaker 2>You said the government sort wants to let this play out,

0:05:16.520 --> 0:05:17.840
<v Speaker 2>but what does that actually mean.

0:05:18.000 --> 0:05:19.720
<v Speaker 3>At the moment, we are in the middle of a

0:05:19.760 --> 0:05:21.720
<v Speaker 3>crucial point in the regulation process.

0:05:21.760 --> 0:05:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Off what is the regulator.

0:05:23.240 --> 0:05:25.800
<v Speaker 3>Every five years, every single water company has to say,

0:05:25.800 --> 0:05:28.320
<v Speaker 3>this is our five year business plan of what we're

0:05:28.320 --> 0:05:30.000
<v Speaker 3>going to do, the investments we're going to make. So

0:05:30.040 --> 0:05:32.360
<v Speaker 3>at the moment they are all trying to work out

0:05:32.360 --> 0:05:33.880
<v Speaker 3>what they're going to do from twenty twenty five to

0:05:33.920 --> 0:05:36.000
<v Speaker 3>twenty thirty. They put the business plans in at the

0:05:36.040 --> 0:05:37.720
<v Speaker 3>end of last year, and off What spends a year

0:05:37.800 --> 0:05:40.320
<v Speaker 3>reviewing them. So this is really crucial at the moment

0:05:40.320 --> 0:05:42.920
<v Speaker 3>because they're in negotiations and that's what's been happening between

0:05:42.920 --> 0:05:47.000
<v Speaker 3>Thames and off What and it's become very politicized because

0:05:47.880 --> 0:05:51.120
<v Speaker 3>spalled back to COVID people started swimming in rivers, they

0:05:51.160 --> 0:05:54.599
<v Speaker 3>realized that they were swimming in poo. Water companies would

0:05:54.600 --> 0:05:58.200
<v Speaker 3>which is shocking. Yeah, water companies were told you have

0:05:58.240 --> 0:06:02.440
<v Speaker 3>to make massive investments in stopping sewage bills and stopping leaks,

0:06:02.440 --> 0:06:04.520
<v Speaker 3>and water companies were saying, but up until now we've

0:06:04.520 --> 0:06:07.039
<v Speaker 3>been told that the main focus has been to keep

0:06:07.040 --> 0:06:10.760
<v Speaker 3>bills low, which is still a focus, but you also

0:06:10.800 --> 0:06:12.479
<v Speaker 3>have to now fix all the sewage bills and all

0:06:12.480 --> 0:06:15.080
<v Speaker 3>the leaks, and Thames is appalling for sewage bills and

0:06:15.120 --> 0:06:17.600
<v Speaker 3>it has the worst leaks of all the water companies.

0:06:17.760 --> 0:06:19.960
<v Speaker 3>The other thing that was happening was there was concerns

0:06:20.000 --> 0:06:23.240
<v Speaker 3>about dividends and off what started cracking down on dividends,

0:06:23.880 --> 0:06:28.119
<v Speaker 3>and Thames's whole business model is basically built on paying

0:06:28.160 --> 0:06:31.960
<v Speaker 3>dividends to its parent company, and off what has stopped that,

0:06:32.040 --> 0:06:34.320
<v Speaker 3>which means that its parent company now has no source

0:06:34.360 --> 0:06:34.840
<v Speaker 3>of income.

0:06:35.240 --> 0:06:36.920
<v Speaker 1>So if we just go back to how this is going.

0:06:36.839 --> 0:06:40.520
<v Speaker 3>To play out, all of these negotiations that have been

0:06:40.520 --> 0:06:42.480
<v Speaker 3>happening between Thames and off Whats so far have been

0:06:43.080 --> 0:06:45.600
<v Speaker 3>behind the scenes, and what's been announced is based on

0:06:45.760 --> 0:06:48.960
<v Speaker 3>conversations that we don't really know the details of. But

0:06:49.120 --> 0:06:51.480
<v Speaker 3>in June, off what has to come out with its

0:06:51.560 --> 0:06:54.120
<v Speaker 3>draft determinations on all the business plans. That's going to

0:06:54.160 --> 0:06:55.880
<v Speaker 3>be the next sort of big moment for Thames. They

0:06:55.920 --> 0:06:57.760
<v Speaker 3>have said, we're going to go back to our parent

0:06:57.760 --> 0:07:00.479
<v Speaker 3>company at this stage and ask again, please you give

0:07:00.560 --> 0:07:02.560
<v Speaker 3>us the money we need. So they need about three

0:07:02.600 --> 0:07:06.640
<v Speaker 3>billion out to the end of twenty thirty. But as

0:07:06.680 --> 0:07:10.080
<v Speaker 3>it stands with Kemble defaulting on its loans, that's very unlikely.

0:07:10.720 --> 0:07:13.240
<v Speaker 3>So then Chris West and the CEO said, well, we

0:07:13.280 --> 0:07:15.200
<v Speaker 3>might go to the market, So what does that mean

0:07:15.280 --> 0:07:15.800
<v Speaker 3>an IPO?

0:07:18.240 --> 0:07:18.880
<v Speaker 1>Which will you.

0:07:18.920 --> 0:07:20.679
<v Speaker 3>Know, A lot of people have laughed at the idea

0:07:20.720 --> 0:07:23.000
<v Speaker 3>of that. Terms would probably do very badly in an IPO.

0:07:23.200 --> 0:07:27.360
<v Speaker 3>But listed water companies perform much much better than all

0:07:27.360 --> 0:07:29.440
<v Speaker 3>the other water companies that are run by private equity.

0:07:29.440 --> 0:07:32.640
<v Speaker 3>There are so much more transparency and accountability, and you

0:07:32.720 --> 0:07:35.760
<v Speaker 3>have kind of easier access to to shareholders and investors

0:07:35.760 --> 0:07:36.480
<v Speaker 3>if you did it that way.

0:07:36.520 --> 0:07:37.960
<v Speaker 1>So that is a possible, That's.

0:07:37.920 --> 0:07:40.720
<v Speaker 4>Exactly I think that would be a good.

0:07:40.480 --> 0:07:42.440
<v Speaker 1>I really don't know. I was talking to dta Helm

0:07:42.600 --> 0:07:43.400
<v Speaker 1>on Friday.

0:07:43.120 --> 0:07:44.240
<v Speaker 4>About an energy expert.

0:07:45.040 --> 0:07:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and he thinks he thinks it's a good idea.

0:07:47.560 --> 0:07:49.440
<v Speaker 3>But other people I spoke to they just laughed in

0:07:49.480 --> 0:07:51.520
<v Speaker 3>my face when I suggested it and said no, you know,

0:07:52.480 --> 0:07:54.080
<v Speaker 3>like when when was the last time I was trying

0:07:54.120 --> 0:07:56.160
<v Speaker 3>to think back to it. When was the last time

0:07:56.160 --> 0:07:57.880
<v Speaker 3>we had a big sort of IPO, Like was it

0:07:58.000 --> 0:07:59.720
<v Speaker 3>Royal Mail Company?

0:07:59.720 --> 0:08:02.920
<v Speaker 4>And yeah, Alva, how does that play out?

0:08:03.080 --> 0:08:06.080
<v Speaker 5>But people will always need water, which is why people

0:08:06.160 --> 0:08:08.760
<v Speaker 5>have sort of pension funds invest in it in the

0:08:08.800 --> 0:08:12.200
<v Speaker 5>first place. So maybe in the longer terme jest. Do

0:08:12.200 --> 0:08:14.600
<v Speaker 5>you think that that that could work?

0:08:14.760 --> 0:08:17.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I wonder whether it could be quite bumpy to start,

0:08:17.320 --> 0:08:19.880
<v Speaker 3>but as you say, that's that's the whole reason that

0:08:20.320 --> 0:08:23.360
<v Speaker 3>people invested in water in the first place. And Tames

0:08:23.360 --> 0:08:25.200
<v Speaker 3>Water is too big to fail at the moment, it

0:08:25.200 --> 0:08:25.720
<v Speaker 3>could get.

0:08:25.560 --> 0:08:31.600
<v Speaker 1>Broken up, and I think, I think it's I think it's.

0:08:31.440 --> 0:08:33.760
<v Speaker 3>Possible, and times have said yeah, all options are on

0:08:33.800 --> 0:08:35.040
<v Speaker 3>the table at the moment.

0:08:35.280 --> 0:08:38.120
<v Speaker 5>Thames wanted to put up bills by forty percent. This

0:08:38.200 --> 0:08:41.200
<v Speaker 5>is sort of where the latest crisis has come from.

0:08:41.240 --> 0:08:43.079
<v Speaker 5>They had a five year plan to put up bills

0:08:43.080 --> 0:08:44.800
<v Speaker 5>by forty percent to pay off some of the s debt,

0:08:45.040 --> 0:08:48.640
<v Speaker 5>to invest in infrastructure. Can you take us through what

0:08:48.760 --> 0:08:53.040
<v Speaker 5>has happened since and quite how dramatic things are at

0:08:53.040 --> 0:08:53.480
<v Speaker 5>this point.

0:08:54.360 --> 0:08:57.000
<v Speaker 3>Tames has been asking off what for leeway on a

0:08:57.000 --> 0:08:59.959
<v Speaker 3>couple of things, and from my reporting speaking to people

0:09:00.280 --> 0:09:03.080
<v Speaker 3>on all sides of everything, there's a couple of things

0:09:03.160 --> 0:09:06.280
<v Speaker 3>that Thames want and I think it's very natural for

0:09:06.520 --> 0:09:10.600
<v Speaker 3>in this like extremely complicated environment for people to focus

0:09:10.600 --> 0:09:13.000
<v Speaker 3>on bills. All the water companies want to want to

0:09:13.000 --> 0:09:14.640
<v Speaker 3>put up bills, and Thames is looking to put up

0:09:14.640 --> 0:09:16.840
<v Speaker 3>bills by forty percent by the end of twenty thirty.

0:09:17.600 --> 0:09:21.320
<v Speaker 3>I think probably what's more significant is there's something called

0:09:21.360 --> 0:09:23.840
<v Speaker 3>the whack. So over the last six months I've been

0:09:23.880 --> 0:09:24.320
<v Speaker 3>doing a lot.

0:09:24.200 --> 0:09:25.280
<v Speaker 4>Of learning about the whack.

0:09:25.360 --> 0:09:29.000
<v Speaker 3>Tell us about the wack jargon wa WA double C

0:09:29.520 --> 0:09:31.880
<v Speaker 3>the weighted cost of capital, and that's kind of really

0:09:31.920 --> 0:09:35.400
<v Speaker 3>crucial to all these negotiations. So that says like, this

0:09:35.440 --> 0:09:37.160
<v Speaker 3>is how much it's going to cost Thames Water to

0:09:37.200 --> 0:09:40.680
<v Speaker 3>dig up the road outside of Bloomberg HQ to fix

0:09:40.760 --> 0:09:44.120
<v Speaker 3>that leaky pipe, and Thames is saying, look, you know,

0:09:44.160 --> 0:09:46.760
<v Speaker 3>it's going to cost us one hundred pounds a day.

0:09:47.000 --> 0:09:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Obviously a lot more than that.

0:09:48.640 --> 0:09:51.760
<v Speaker 3>And of what is saying, well, you know, up in

0:09:52.600 --> 0:09:54.520
<v Speaker 3>you know, another part of the country, it's costing seven

0:09:54.840 --> 0:09:56.760
<v Speaker 3>only seventy pounds a day, so I don't see why

0:09:56.800 --> 0:09:59.840
<v Speaker 3>it should cost you anymore. So Tames are saying, you know,

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:02.360
<v Speaker 3>effectively it's London waiting, right, it costs more to do

0:10:02.360 --> 0:10:05.720
<v Speaker 3>stuff in London because there's skyscrapers and a lot of people.

0:10:06.200 --> 0:10:10.079
<v Speaker 3>And off, what's not bending on that off, what's argument

0:10:10.240 --> 0:10:14.040
<v Speaker 3>is this company has been financially engineered over the years.

0:10:14.200 --> 0:10:20.320
<v Speaker 3>It's failing on sewage it's failing on leakage, why should

0:10:20.360 --> 0:10:24.040
<v Speaker 3>we give this company any leeway and off what is

0:10:24.080 --> 0:10:26.880
<v Speaker 3>fighting for its life as well of what needs to

0:10:26.920 --> 0:10:29.120
<v Speaker 3>prove that it's cracking down.

0:10:29.240 --> 0:10:32.240
<v Speaker 5>So just what are the other options? We've sort of

0:10:32.360 --> 0:10:34.640
<v Speaker 5>hinted at it, But yeah, how likely is it that

0:10:34.679 --> 0:10:38.480
<v Speaker 5>the government steps in? And what are the other options

0:10:38.480 --> 0:10:38.959
<v Speaker 5>on the table?

0:10:38.960 --> 0:10:40.679
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, So as I think we we sort of

0:10:40.679 --> 0:10:43.040
<v Speaker 3>reference earlier, the government wants this to play out. So

0:10:43.280 --> 0:10:46.080
<v Speaker 3>I think this government does not want to step in.

0:10:46.120 --> 0:10:48.920
<v Speaker 3>I mean, we've got an election in a couple of

0:10:48.960 --> 0:10:51.960
<v Speaker 3>weeks time, mayoral elections in London and obviously Terms is

0:10:52.000 --> 0:10:55.360
<v Speaker 3>the supplier of London water. Then we've got a general

0:10:55.400 --> 0:10:57.400
<v Speaker 3>election coming up, and they do not want to make

0:10:57.440 --> 0:11:03.120
<v Speaker 3>this an election about water. Anyone who takes ownership of Thames,

0:11:03.160 --> 0:11:05.520
<v Speaker 3>I mean, as far as I know, no one would

0:11:05.520 --> 0:11:09.680
<v Speaker 3>buy Thames as it stands. But if say you decide

0:11:09.679 --> 0:11:11.240
<v Speaker 3>to buy it for a pound, you would then have

0:11:11.280 --> 0:11:14.920
<v Speaker 3>to invest three billion pounds in fixing chronic leak, sewage spills,

0:11:15.240 --> 0:11:19.079
<v Speaker 3>terrible customer service, everything. So the government does not want

0:11:19.120 --> 0:11:22.880
<v Speaker 3>to spend three billion pounds on sorting this out, particularly

0:11:23.080 --> 0:11:26.280
<v Speaker 3>if you think about why they got into this mess.

0:11:26.559 --> 0:11:31.120
<v Speaker 3>Is it really the responsibility of the taxpayer to fund

0:11:31.160 --> 0:11:34.200
<v Speaker 3>that investment that should have been happening over the last

0:11:34.400 --> 0:11:35.040
<v Speaker 3>decade or so?

0:11:35.280 --> 0:11:38.439
<v Speaker 2>Alva, what's the Labor perspective on all of this? Clearly

0:11:39.120 --> 0:11:42.520
<v Speaker 2>recesting that Prime Minister and Steve Barkley are wanting the

0:11:42.679 --> 0:11:45.320
<v Speaker 2>company to sort this out, but this is a central

0:11:45.360 --> 0:11:48.280
<v Speaker 2>issue for a possible next government if Labor win the

0:11:48.320 --> 0:11:48.840
<v Speaker 2>next election.

0:11:49.640 --> 0:11:52.280
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I think so. I mean, especially because it looks

0:11:52.320 --> 0:11:55.480
<v Speaker 5>as though the government are hoping that they will be

0:11:55.520 --> 0:11:58.000
<v Speaker 5>able to wash their hands off this and ess as

0:11:58.040 --> 0:12:01.360
<v Speaker 5>reported that Thames should have enough money to last until

0:12:01.679 --> 0:12:03.800
<v Speaker 5>next year so they could just kick the cant on

0:12:03.800 --> 0:12:06.720
<v Speaker 5>the road. Labor would have to potentially step in and

0:12:07.160 --> 0:12:11.319
<v Speaker 5>bail terms out essentially, which they desperately don't want to do.

0:12:11.800 --> 0:12:14.040
<v Speaker 5>I think they're not saying terribly much about it, even

0:12:14.080 --> 0:12:16.840
<v Speaker 5>off the record. I think that they are probably actually

0:12:16.840 --> 0:12:18.640
<v Speaker 5>more aligned with the government on this than they would

0:12:18.640 --> 0:12:20.679
<v Speaker 5>like to admit. If there are potential avenues for the

0:12:20.720 --> 0:12:23.520
<v Speaker 5>government to never get involved, I think Labor would favor that,

0:12:23.600 --> 0:12:24.160
<v Speaker 5>which is true.

0:12:24.480 --> 0:12:26.360
<v Speaker 3>I was talking to an investor who was saying, they're

0:12:26.400 --> 0:12:29.120
<v Speaker 3>wondering the size of Labour's majority, because if they have

0:12:29.200 --> 0:12:32.000
<v Speaker 3>a very large majority, Kirstama will be able to avoid

0:12:32.360 --> 0:12:35.600
<v Speaker 3>special administration. But if they have a smaller majority, and

0:12:35.640 --> 0:12:37.960
<v Speaker 3>you know, John McDonnell and some of the people on

0:12:38.000 --> 0:12:40.120
<v Speaker 3>the hard left have been calling for nationalization, it would

0:12:40.120 --> 0:12:41.560
<v Speaker 3>be harder for him to avoid that.

0:12:41.880 --> 0:12:45.400
<v Speaker 5>Jess you reported last week that OFF what has to

0:12:45.440 --> 0:12:49.960
<v Speaker 5>make a decision about whether to find terms for some

0:12:50.080 --> 0:12:55.080
<v Speaker 5>of this mismanagement, and my read of that was that

0:12:55.080 --> 0:12:57.679
<v Speaker 5>that could be decisive and whether the government does need

0:12:57.720 --> 0:13:01.280
<v Speaker 5>to step in sooner rather than later. What's happening with

0:13:01.360 --> 0:13:01.839
<v Speaker 5>that fine?

0:13:01.960 --> 0:13:02.960
<v Speaker 4>Would it change things?

0:13:03.120 --> 0:13:03.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:13:03.360 --> 0:13:06.520
<v Speaker 3>I think that has broader implications for the whole industry really,

0:13:06.600 --> 0:13:10.720
<v Speaker 3>because the way that a lot of these businesses are

0:13:10.720 --> 0:13:15.360
<v Speaker 3>structured is you've got the utility, which is regulated and

0:13:15.440 --> 0:13:21.440
<v Speaker 3>ring fenced, paying dividends to the unregulated parent company to

0:13:21.600 --> 0:13:24.960
<v Speaker 3>service the parent company's debt. And that is of what

0:13:25.080 --> 0:13:28.120
<v Speaker 3>is not happy with OFF. What it's saying, particularly if

0:13:28.160 --> 0:13:31.680
<v Speaker 3>you're a poorly performing company, you should not be paying

0:13:31.720 --> 0:13:34.439
<v Speaker 3>dividends to service someone else's debt. All the money should

0:13:34.440 --> 0:13:37.960
<v Speaker 3>be going to fixing sewage spills and leaks. And Thames

0:13:38.000 --> 0:13:40.520
<v Speaker 3>was basically just the test case because that rule was

0:13:40.559 --> 0:13:42.880
<v Speaker 3>introduced around this time last year in Thames was the

0:13:42.880 --> 0:13:44.960
<v Speaker 3>first one to announce that it had paid the dividends.

0:13:45.080 --> 0:13:48.160
<v Speaker 3>My question is whether this could have a domino effect

0:13:48.640 --> 0:13:51.480
<v Speaker 3>and when other companies start getting blocked from paying these

0:13:51.520 --> 0:13:56.120
<v Speaker 3>dividends as well, their parent companies would also say that

0:13:56.200 --> 0:13:58.679
<v Speaker 3>this structure is no longer sustainable.

0:13:59.400 --> 0:14:02.280
<v Speaker 2>Unless we're for all these big infrastructure upgrades that you

0:14:02.320 --> 0:14:05.880
<v Speaker 2>can see across lots of different policy areas, private money

0:14:05.880 --> 0:14:08.480
<v Speaker 2>will be needed. And is there a concern that the

0:14:08.559 --> 0:14:11.000
<v Speaker 2>regulator may have gone too far the other way? And

0:14:11.040 --> 0:14:14.240
<v Speaker 2>for private money around the world looking at the UK

0:14:14.360 --> 0:14:16.560
<v Speaker 2>and thinking do I invest in its utilities?

0:14:16.960 --> 0:14:18.400
<v Speaker 4>Is that going to become too risky?

0:14:18.559 --> 0:14:18.719
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:14:18.720 --> 0:14:19.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean I understand.

0:14:19.600 --> 0:14:22.680
<v Speaker 3>I've just been told from conversations with investors that the

0:14:22.680 --> 0:14:25.880
<v Speaker 3>Treasury is quite worried about the signal this sends to

0:14:26.160 --> 0:14:28.680
<v Speaker 3>investors globally. And I think the question is is Tames

0:14:28.760 --> 0:14:31.200
<v Speaker 3>a bad apple. Is it just a very very badly

0:14:31.280 --> 0:14:36.000
<v Speaker 3>run utility, or is this the UK saying we've got

0:14:36.080 --> 0:14:39.000
<v Speaker 3>very complicated and difficult regulation and you shouldn't come here.

0:14:39.600 --> 0:14:42.600
<v Speaker 1>I think it's probably the former. I think Thames has

0:14:42.680 --> 0:14:43.120
<v Speaker 1>just been.

0:14:43.000 --> 0:14:45.920
<v Speaker 3>A right old mess and off what is in a

0:14:46.080 --> 0:14:49.960
<v Speaker 3>very very difficult situation politically. The investors have been very

0:14:50.000 --> 0:14:52.680
<v Speaker 3>critical off what but if you push them they kind

0:14:52.720 --> 0:14:55.480
<v Speaker 3>of admit that, like what else can they do? I

0:14:55.520 --> 0:14:59.040
<v Speaker 3>think the noise around it makes this sector completely uninvestable

0:14:59.120 --> 0:15:01.520
<v Speaker 3>at the moment, and that is something that really has

0:15:01.560 --> 0:15:05.400
<v Speaker 3>to be tackled because there's so much negativity in the

0:15:05.400 --> 0:15:09.240
<v Speaker 3>media and around the politics of it that no one

0:15:09.520 --> 0:15:11.040
<v Speaker 3>in their right mind just want to go near it.

0:15:11.960 --> 0:15:16.200
<v Speaker 5>So we haven't formally heard from off what it makes

0:15:16.240 --> 0:15:20.720
<v Speaker 5>of Thames's planned but we've had reporting that it doesn't

0:15:20.720 --> 0:15:25.440
<v Speaker 5>support the current plans, and then shareholders have said that

0:15:25.600 --> 0:15:28.080
<v Speaker 5>Thames is uninvestable they refuse to put the money in,

0:15:28.480 --> 0:15:33.760
<v Speaker 5>and then last week the parent company defaulted on its debt.

0:15:34.760 --> 0:15:40.240
<v Speaker 5>So it seems like this crisis has ratcheted up quite

0:15:40.240 --> 0:15:42.160
<v Speaker 5>a few notches, yes, and.

0:15:43.040 --> 0:15:44.800
<v Speaker 1>Quite dramatically in the last two weeks.

0:15:44.880 --> 0:15:48.720
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, So what happens in the immediate term? What should

0:15:48.720 --> 0:15:49.800
<v Speaker 5>we look for next?

0:15:49.840 --> 0:15:52.760
<v Speaker 3>Who's going to blink? I think is it a question?

0:15:53.000 --> 0:15:55.360
<v Speaker 3>Is this a game of brinkmanship? And I think that's

0:15:55.400 --> 0:15:57.200
<v Speaker 3>what a lot of people think. A lot of the

0:15:57.240 --> 0:16:02.240
<v Speaker 3>newspapers are reporting that the parent company has said, like,

0:16:02.280 --> 0:16:05.320
<v Speaker 3>we're not even waiting for off What's an official determination.

0:16:05.560 --> 0:16:08.040
<v Speaker 3>We've had enough conversations with off What to know that

0:16:08.080 --> 0:16:10.360
<v Speaker 3>this is not going to work. This plan is uninvestable,

0:16:10.920 --> 0:16:13.280
<v Speaker 3>and therefore you deal with it.

0:16:13.320 --> 0:16:17.040
<v Speaker 1>We're done, so you know.

0:16:17.160 --> 0:16:20.240
<v Speaker 3>One option could be that one of the larger shareholders,

0:16:20.320 --> 0:16:24.880
<v Speaker 3>say Omer's, which is the Canadian or USS, says Okay,

0:16:25.080 --> 0:16:27.760
<v Speaker 3>we've put all this money into Thames already, we still

0:16:27.800 --> 0:16:30.360
<v Speaker 3>haven't got a penny out. Why don't we just gamble again.

0:16:30.720 --> 0:16:33.600
<v Speaker 3>We'll put the three billion in and we'll wipe out

0:16:33.600 --> 0:16:37.080
<v Speaker 3>all the other investors and we'll take this on and

0:16:37.120 --> 0:16:40.320
<v Speaker 3>eventually Thames will get turned around and we will make money.

0:16:42.080 --> 0:16:44.440
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if that is going to happen, because

0:16:44.760 --> 0:16:52.080
<v Speaker 3>having had conversations with people around this, it seems quite terminal,

0:16:52.200 --> 0:16:54.720
<v Speaker 3>and the fact that Kemball has defaulted on its loans

0:16:55.280 --> 0:16:57.800
<v Speaker 3>suggests that they really have thrown in the towel.

0:16:58.360 --> 0:17:01.080
<v Speaker 5>Jess, thank you so much for coming in and explaining

0:17:01.120 --> 0:17:04.639
<v Speaker 5>all of this to us. Is markey business, No worries anytime.

0:17:05.320 --> 0:17:06.760
<v Speaker 5>I fear you'll be back quite soon.

0:17:06.840 --> 0:17:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Oh no, it's true. For the next year.

0:17:08.680 --> 0:17:11.920
<v Speaker 3>This is gonna This is a very slowly imploding company.

0:17:12.000 --> 0:17:12.600
<v Speaker 1>I think it's.

0:17:15.760 --> 0:17:18.040
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for listening to this week's In the City from Bloomberg.

0:17:18.119 --> 0:17:21.320
<v Speaker 2>This episode was hosted by me alegra Stratton with Alva Ray,

0:17:21.600 --> 0:17:24.760
<v Speaker 2>and it was produced by Somersadi additional editing by Blake

0:17:24.800 --> 0:17:29.159
<v Speaker 2>Maple's Brendan Newnham is our executive producer. Sage Bauman is

0:17:29.200 --> 0:17:32.080
<v Speaker 2>Head of Podcasts and special thanks to Jess Shankleman.

0:17:32.520 --> 0:17:36.560
<v Speaker 4>Please subscribe, rate, and review wherever you listen to your podcasts.