WEBVTT - Put on Your Jetpacks and Let's Fly!

0:00:04.480 --> 0:00:12.639
<v Speaker 1>Technology with tech Stuff from hastaff works dot com. Hey there,

0:00:12.640 --> 0:00:16.400
<v Speaker 1>and welcome to tech Stuff. I am your host, Jonathan Strickland,

0:00:16.680 --> 0:00:19.440
<v Speaker 1>lover of all things tech, and today I thought i'd

0:00:19.440 --> 0:00:22.720
<v Speaker 1>talked about the technology that has often been associated with

0:00:22.760 --> 0:00:26.720
<v Speaker 1>our general concept of the future. When you hear the

0:00:26.800 --> 0:00:30.920
<v Speaker 1>terms the future, there's certain things that tend to pop

0:00:31.000 --> 0:00:33.319
<v Speaker 1>up over and over again in people's minds. Now, when

0:00:33.320 --> 0:00:35.440
<v Speaker 1>I think of the future, I think of stuff like

0:00:35.920 --> 0:00:40.720
<v Speaker 1>artificially intelligent computers or robots. I think about meals and

0:00:40.800 --> 0:00:42.960
<v Speaker 1>pill form because you know, I was a kid of

0:00:42.960 --> 0:00:45.240
<v Speaker 1>the seventies and eighties, and that was, for some reason,

0:00:45.640 --> 0:00:47.960
<v Speaker 1>the concept of how we were all going to survive

0:00:48.000 --> 0:00:50.680
<v Speaker 1>in the future was have these these meals that would

0:00:50.720 --> 0:00:53.280
<v Speaker 1>just be in a pill and uh, if you're really lucky,

0:00:53.320 --> 0:00:56.440
<v Speaker 1>you turn into a giant blueberry. But I also would

0:00:56.440 --> 0:00:58.320
<v Speaker 1>think of something else that's going to be the subject

0:00:58.320 --> 0:01:01.560
<v Speaker 1>for today's episode, jet pack x Uh. I've talked about

0:01:01.560 --> 0:01:04.280
<v Speaker 1>flying cars in the past, so that's off the table.

0:01:04.280 --> 0:01:07.200
<v Speaker 1>But jet packs are totally something I can tackle. They

0:01:07.240 --> 0:01:10.480
<v Speaker 1>are prominent in pop culture, and there are a few

0:01:10.560 --> 0:01:15.440
<v Speaker 1>real world examples of jet packs or variations on the theme.

0:01:15.560 --> 0:01:18.720
<v Speaker 1>In some cases it's not a jet pack. It might

0:01:18.760 --> 0:01:22.520
<v Speaker 1>be more like a jet hoverboard, and in some cases

0:01:22.560 --> 0:01:24.800
<v Speaker 1>it might be more of a rocket pack than a

0:01:24.880 --> 0:01:28.600
<v Speaker 1>jet pack. But we're going to cover all of that today, uh,

0:01:28.640 --> 0:01:30.480
<v Speaker 1>and I want to talk about some of the gadgets,

0:01:30.560 --> 0:01:33.720
<v Speaker 1>how they work, and what their limitations are, and also

0:01:33.760 --> 0:01:36.280
<v Speaker 1>explain why I think jet packs will never become a

0:01:36.319 --> 0:01:41.800
<v Speaker 1>real consumer technology. Now, first, let's define a few things.

0:01:41.880 --> 0:01:44.839
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to talk about several different types of technology

0:01:44.880 --> 0:01:47.960
<v Speaker 1>today that tend to get lumped under the general category

0:01:47.960 --> 0:01:50.080
<v Speaker 1>of jet pack. But as I said, not all of

0:01:50.080 --> 0:01:54.120
<v Speaker 1>them use jet engine technology. Some of them are more

0:01:54.160 --> 0:01:57.320
<v Speaker 1>like rocket packs rocket belts because they use a type

0:01:57.320 --> 0:02:00.960
<v Speaker 1>of combustible fuel to generate thrust. And at least one

0:02:01.000 --> 0:02:02.520
<v Speaker 1>of the ones I want to talk about isn't a

0:02:02.560 --> 0:02:05.320
<v Speaker 1>pack at all. It's a platform you would stand on,

0:02:05.480 --> 0:02:08.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of like a quad copter or a drone, but

0:02:08.800 --> 0:02:11.240
<v Speaker 1>souped up to the point where it's powerful enough to

0:02:11.360 --> 0:02:15.480
<v Speaker 1>carry a human being standing on top of it, and

0:02:15.639 --> 0:02:17.560
<v Speaker 1>all of it I think can kind of sort of

0:02:17.600 --> 0:02:22.280
<v Speaker 1>be generously lumped under the term jet pack, even in

0:02:22.360 --> 0:02:25.720
<v Speaker 1>though in some cases you're not wearing a pack at all. Now,

0:02:25.760 --> 0:02:29.560
<v Speaker 1>the concept of strapping jets or rockets to your back

0:02:29.639 --> 0:02:33.280
<v Speaker 1>so that you can achieve flight is pretty old. In

0:02:33.400 --> 0:02:37.679
<v Speaker 1>the October second issue of Scientific American, all the way

0:02:37.720 --> 0:02:41.200
<v Speaker 1>back in nineteen o nine, there was a piece that

0:02:41.240 --> 0:02:45.320
<v Speaker 1>was written by a guy named John Elfrith Watkins, and

0:02:45.400 --> 0:02:49.600
<v Speaker 1>it relayed the story of a supposed ancient Chinese astronaut.

0:02:50.280 --> 0:02:56.000
<v Speaker 1>In his story, this astronaut's name was Wong two. Watkins

0:02:56.160 --> 0:02:59.160
<v Speaker 1>said that according to legend, Wong to set upon a

0:02:59.240 --> 0:03:02.000
<v Speaker 1>chair moult to do on a platform and attached to

0:03:02.040 --> 0:03:07.480
<v Speaker 1>that platform where forty seven rockets. Forty seven attendants lit

0:03:07.520 --> 0:03:11.359
<v Speaker 1>these rockets which were meant to all ignite simultaneously and

0:03:11.480 --> 0:03:16.600
<v Speaker 1>lift Wong two to the heavens in a glorious demonstration

0:03:16.800 --> 0:03:21.400
<v Speaker 1>for the Emperor of China. But Watkins explained, one of

0:03:21.440 --> 0:03:28.079
<v Speaker 1>those rockets exploded and the explosion badly burned Wong too.

0:03:28.360 --> 0:03:31.000
<v Speaker 1>On top of that, the Chinese emperor was quite unhappy

0:03:31.080 --> 0:03:35.280
<v Speaker 1>about the whole thing, And supposedly this event happened all

0:03:35.320 --> 0:03:39.480
<v Speaker 1>the way back in two thousand b c. E. Now,

0:03:39.480 --> 0:03:42.080
<v Speaker 1>there's a very good chance that this whole piece was

0:03:42.160 --> 0:03:45.960
<v Speaker 1>just a tongue in cheek take on the idea and

0:03:46.080 --> 0:03:48.960
<v Speaker 1>a figment of watkins imagination that it was not meant

0:03:48.960 --> 0:03:53.120
<v Speaker 1>to actually relay a real Chinese legend, but it's still meant.

0:03:53.120 --> 0:03:55.560
<v Speaker 1>You've got a precursor to jet packs described in a

0:03:55.680 --> 0:04:00.160
<v Speaker 1>nineteen o nine periodical, which is still fairly early. In

0:04:00.240 --> 0:04:03.760
<v Speaker 1>nineteen forty five, Herbert s. Zem would tell a very

0:04:03.800 --> 0:04:08.040
<v Speaker 1>similar story to Watkins, except in his story the protagonist

0:04:08.320 --> 0:04:11.200
<v Speaker 1>was named Wan Who, and it took place in the

0:04:11.280 --> 0:04:16.120
<v Speaker 1>sixteenth century Common era, so well nearly three thousand, what

0:04:16.240 --> 0:04:18.960
<v Speaker 1>three thousand, six hundred years later it was crazy. In

0:04:19.000 --> 0:04:21.360
<v Speaker 1>any case, we still think the story is probably bunk

0:04:21.520 --> 0:04:24.560
<v Speaker 1>and was invented in the twentieth century, not an ancient

0:04:24.680 --> 0:04:28.000
<v Speaker 1>or medieval China. Also, this was one of the stories

0:04:28.040 --> 0:04:31.760
<v Speaker 1>that would later be tested on the series MythBusters, where

0:04:31.800 --> 0:04:35.240
<v Speaker 1>they would attempt to create a rocket powered chair and

0:04:35.560 --> 0:04:38.280
<v Speaker 1>things went about as well as you would expect. So

0:04:39.000 --> 0:04:41.600
<v Speaker 1>if you haven't seen that episode, you should probably dig

0:04:41.640 --> 0:04:43.599
<v Speaker 1>it up see if you can watch and see what

0:04:43.600 --> 0:04:45.599
<v Speaker 1>happens when someone tries to light a whole bunch of

0:04:45.680 --> 0:04:50.039
<v Speaker 1>rockets mounted underneath the chair. Now, between the accounts of

0:04:50.120 --> 0:04:53.719
<v Speaker 1>Wong two in nineteen o nine and Wan Who in

0:04:53.839 --> 0:04:58.080
<v Speaker 1>nineteen forty five falls. Another early depiction of jet packs,

0:04:58.400 --> 0:05:01.159
<v Speaker 1>and this was an illustration on the cover of the

0:05:01.320 --> 0:05:07.040
<v Speaker 1>short story periodical Amazing Stories. And man, did I love

0:05:07.160 --> 0:05:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Amazing Stories. Not that I was around when it was

0:05:09.560 --> 0:05:11.520
<v Speaker 1>first being published, but I've read several of the stories

0:05:11.560 --> 0:05:14.600
<v Speaker 1>that were that were originally published in Amazing Stories. And

0:05:14.680 --> 0:05:18.240
<v Speaker 1>I even enjoyed to some extent the television series that

0:05:18.279 --> 0:05:21.200
<v Speaker 1>was inspired by it, the TV series that was produced

0:05:21.200 --> 0:05:24.240
<v Speaker 1>by Steven Spielberg in the nineteen eighties. Uh, if you've

0:05:24.279 --> 0:05:26.440
<v Speaker 1>ever had a chance to watch it, it's pretty terrible,

0:05:26.520 --> 0:05:30.880
<v Speaker 1>but I still enjoyed it anyway. Frank R. Paul created

0:05:30.920 --> 0:05:35.200
<v Speaker 1>the illustration for the cover of that issue of Amazing Stories,

0:05:35.560 --> 0:05:38.360
<v Speaker 1>and there is a man wearing a jet pack flying around.

0:05:38.400 --> 0:05:43.000
<v Speaker 1>He's got a hand hold control, uh, the handheld control rather,

0:05:43.120 --> 0:05:46.919
<v Speaker 1>and it's tethered to his harness, So it's clearly the

0:05:46.960 --> 0:05:51.160
<v Speaker 1>control for the jet pack. There's no visible signs of

0:05:51.200 --> 0:05:54.880
<v Speaker 1>what is creating the levitation effect, like there's no exhaust

0:05:55.000 --> 0:05:58.080
<v Speaker 1>or any other designs of what might be creating the thrust.

0:05:58.200 --> 0:06:00.640
<v Speaker 1>So it's not clear what Paul had in my mind

0:06:00.960 --> 0:06:04.640
<v Speaker 1>that would keep this guy up there, but it is

0:06:04.680 --> 0:06:09.599
<v Speaker 1>an evocative image, and it's it's certainly illustrating a certain

0:06:09.600 --> 0:06:11.720
<v Speaker 1>sense of wonder that a lot of people have had

0:06:11.760 --> 0:06:14.880
<v Speaker 1>at the thought of soaring through the skies without you know,

0:06:15.400 --> 0:06:20.000
<v Speaker 1>a plane around you. Now. In that issue of Amazing Stories,

0:06:20.320 --> 0:06:25.320
<v Speaker 1>there was also a tale titled Armageddon twenty four nineteen

0:06:25.440 --> 0:06:29.960
<v Speaker 1>a d and it featured a protagonist called Anthony Rogers,

0:06:30.279 --> 0:06:33.920
<v Speaker 1>or Buck to his friends. The world of Buck Rogers

0:06:34.000 --> 0:06:37.920
<v Speaker 1>featured many science fiction technologies, including those that ran on

0:06:38.040 --> 0:06:42.520
<v Speaker 1>the fictional substance inner Ton or inner Ton if you

0:06:42.600 --> 0:06:45.960
<v Speaker 1>prefer I N E R T O N. This was

0:06:46.000 --> 0:06:49.360
<v Speaker 1>supposedly the densest substance in the universe. It was completely

0:06:49.440 --> 0:06:52.240
<v Speaker 1>fictional for the purposes of the story, and the author

0:06:52.320 --> 0:06:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Philip Nolan, described how that particular substance would allow scientists

0:06:56.560 --> 0:07:00.599
<v Speaker 1>to create magnificent technologies, including a belt. I would allow

0:07:00.600 --> 0:07:04.440
<v Speaker 1>you to adjust the effect that gravity would have on yourself,

0:07:04.960 --> 0:07:07.800
<v Speaker 1>so you could reduce the effects of gravity to the

0:07:07.839 --> 0:07:09.840
<v Speaker 1>point where you could, you know, kind of kind of

0:07:09.880 --> 0:07:12.160
<v Speaker 1>float around a little bit, and if you paired it

0:07:12.200 --> 0:07:15.840
<v Speaker 1>with some rockets, you could even fly, or at least

0:07:16.400 --> 0:07:19.320
<v Speaker 1>float with some sort of sense of direction. As for

0:07:19.400 --> 0:07:22.360
<v Speaker 1>working devices in the real world. One of the earliest

0:07:22.600 --> 0:07:28.000
<v Speaker 1>supposed jet pack precursors was the himmel Stummer. Now, this

0:07:28.040 --> 0:07:31.520
<v Speaker 1>was a mythical flight pack that supposedly was created by

0:07:31.640 --> 0:07:35.560
<v Speaker 1>Nazi scientists during World War Two, and it has been

0:07:35.600 --> 0:07:38.800
<v Speaker 1>widely reported as being an actual thing, but I'm here

0:07:38.800 --> 0:07:44.520
<v Speaker 1>to tell you that's likely not to be the case anyway.

0:07:44.600 --> 0:07:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Himil Schemer literally means sky stormer or heaven stormer, and

0:07:49.720 --> 0:07:52.840
<v Speaker 1>legend would have you believe that the himmel Schemer jet

0:07:52.840 --> 0:07:56.280
<v Speaker 1>pack used what's called a pulse engine, which is a

0:07:56.320 --> 0:07:59.320
<v Speaker 1>real thing, and actually it was supposedly using multiple jet

0:07:59.360 --> 0:08:03.200
<v Speaker 1>pulse and and that these would create enough thrust for

0:08:03.280 --> 0:08:06.000
<v Speaker 1>a soldier to make a really powerful leap, so they

0:08:06.000 --> 0:08:08.480
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't really fly so much as they would jump really

0:08:08.560 --> 0:08:11.800
<v Speaker 1>high and really far, kind of like how Superman originally

0:08:11.840 --> 0:08:14.840
<v Speaker 1>couldn't fly, but he could leap tall buildings in a

0:08:14.920 --> 0:08:18.960
<v Speaker 1>single bound. It's true, like the original Superman didn't fly around,

0:08:19.040 --> 0:08:22.120
<v Speaker 1>he just jumped around a lot. Well we're talking jumps

0:08:22.120 --> 0:08:25.239
<v Speaker 1>that would be around a hundred eighty feet in length

0:08:25.280 --> 0:08:30.160
<v Speaker 1>and fifty feet high, so it's pretty spectacular. And supposedly

0:08:30.600 --> 0:08:33.960
<v Speaker 1>it would allow soldiers to clear entire mine fields or

0:08:34.000 --> 0:08:38.199
<v Speaker 1>other obstacles. But as the story goes, the war ended

0:08:38.240 --> 0:08:41.560
<v Speaker 1>before any of these left the prototype phase and got

0:08:41.600 --> 0:08:45.160
<v Speaker 1>deployed in the field, and that the units that were

0:08:45.200 --> 0:08:49.840
<v Speaker 1>created were either destroyed or, as French theory advocates argue,

0:08:50.160 --> 0:08:52.960
<v Speaker 1>they were confiscated by the United States as part of

0:08:53.040 --> 0:08:57.720
<v Speaker 1>Operation paper Clip. Operation paper Clip was this super secret,

0:08:57.920 --> 0:09:01.680
<v Speaker 1>real operation that the US had. This part is absolutely true,

0:09:02.200 --> 0:09:07.320
<v Speaker 1>where they brought over science and scientists from the Nazi

0:09:07.840 --> 0:09:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Germany area and put them to work for the United States.

0:09:11.840 --> 0:09:14.800
<v Speaker 1>So a lot of the early rocketry program in the

0:09:14.920 --> 0:09:19.720
<v Speaker 1>US was courtesy of scientists who had previously been working

0:09:19.760 --> 0:09:23.720
<v Speaker 1>for the Nazis, So that part has some truth to it,

0:09:24.000 --> 0:09:27.000
<v Speaker 1>although there's no evidence that the himmel Schemmer was ever

0:09:27.200 --> 0:09:31.800
<v Speaker 1>part of this real operation. Now, supposedly these engines would

0:09:31.800 --> 0:09:35.040
<v Speaker 1>burn at temperatures low enough that soldiers would not need

0:09:35.160 --> 0:09:39.920
<v Speaker 1>special protective clothing. Only here's the thing, like I said,

0:09:39.960 --> 0:09:42.880
<v Speaker 1>there is no evidence that any of this ever existed,

0:09:43.120 --> 0:09:46.160
<v Speaker 1>that any jet packs were ever made. There are no photographs,

0:09:46.440 --> 0:09:50.280
<v Speaker 1>there's no documentation, and you know, it's impossible to prove

0:09:50.320 --> 0:09:53.280
<v Speaker 1>a negative. It's impossible to say there's absolutely no way

0:09:53.280 --> 0:09:55.840
<v Speaker 1>these existed, because you know, what you have to do

0:09:55.880 --> 0:09:59.520
<v Speaker 1>is find evidence to actually support the existence, but there's

0:09:59.520 --> 0:10:02.559
<v Speaker 1>no such evidence around. There are photos of a soldier

0:10:02.600 --> 0:10:05.600
<v Speaker 1>supposedly using the heimmel Strmer jet pack, but those are

0:10:05.640 --> 0:10:09.480
<v Speaker 1>just of a toy model that was photoshop to look

0:10:09.520 --> 0:10:12.880
<v Speaker 1>like it was a vintage photograph circa ninety four. If

0:10:12.880 --> 0:10:15.160
<v Speaker 1>you look at the original picture, it's a full color

0:10:15.200 --> 0:10:17.520
<v Speaker 1>picture of a toy with some rockets strap to it.

0:10:17.960 --> 0:10:21.000
<v Speaker 1>The earliest account of any sort of jet pack attributed

0:10:21.080 --> 0:10:24.320
<v Speaker 1>to the Nazis appears to be from a book titled

0:10:24.679 --> 0:10:28.800
<v Speaker 1>German Secret Weapons and Wonder Weapons of World War Two,

0:10:29.080 --> 0:10:32.280
<v Speaker 1>which was written in nineteen seventy six, and it was

0:10:32.320 --> 0:10:35.280
<v Speaker 1>written by a guy who was essentially a Nazi sympathizer

0:10:35.320 --> 0:10:40.600
<v Speaker 1>living in Toronto, Canada, so not exactly an unbiased source,

0:10:41.679 --> 0:10:43.280
<v Speaker 1>and as far as we can tell, it was the

0:10:43.360 --> 0:10:46.920
<v Speaker 1>first and only appearance of well first appearance of this

0:10:47.000 --> 0:10:50.319
<v Speaker 1>jet pack idea that nothing predated that, and the same

0:10:50.360 --> 0:10:54.480
<v Speaker 1>author wrote lots of other stuff, including some Holocaust denial

0:10:55.080 --> 0:11:00.880
<v Speaker 1>uh literature, which is pretty awful, so devinly not a

0:11:00.960 --> 0:11:05.040
<v Speaker 1>reliable source. However, you'll find information on the Internet that

0:11:05.040 --> 0:11:08.720
<v Speaker 1>treats it like the Himmel Schemer was definitely a gadget

0:11:08.760 --> 0:11:12.000
<v Speaker 1>that existed in history, despite the fact that there is

0:11:12.040 --> 0:11:14.920
<v Speaker 1>no evidence that such a thing happened, and the person

0:11:15.000 --> 0:11:20.120
<v Speaker 1>who who first started sharing the story has no credibility whatsoever.

0:11:20.800 --> 0:11:23.480
<v Speaker 1>The first personal flying device, a real note that actually

0:11:23.559 --> 0:11:26.120
<v Speaker 1>did exist that I can really talk about it is

0:11:26.160 --> 0:11:29.600
<v Speaker 1>probably the Hiller VZ one, which was built in the

0:11:29.600 --> 0:11:32.520
<v Speaker 1>early nineteen fifties, And this was not a jet pack,

0:11:32.920 --> 0:11:36.400
<v Speaker 1>but rather a platform upon which the pilot would stand,

0:11:36.800 --> 0:11:42.040
<v Speaker 1>so kind of similar to that that apocryphal Chinese legend

0:11:42.040 --> 0:11:45.560
<v Speaker 1>in a way, except it wasn't powered by rockets. It

0:11:45.640 --> 0:11:49.000
<v Speaker 1>was powered by an enormous ducted fan that had a

0:11:49.040 --> 0:11:53.920
<v Speaker 1>pair of counter rotating coaxial propellers to generate the thrust

0:11:53.960 --> 0:11:57.120
<v Speaker 1>needed to lift the whole thing, pilot and all off

0:11:57.160 --> 0:11:59.679
<v Speaker 1>the ground, and to steer it you actually had to

0:11:59.720 --> 0:12:02.559
<v Speaker 1>shift your weight, which, as it turns out, is not

0:12:02.679 --> 0:12:06.080
<v Speaker 1>the most precise way to conduct maneuvers. And some folks

0:12:06.080 --> 0:12:08.640
<v Speaker 1>in the Navy had a real fun little nickname for

0:12:08.679 --> 0:12:11.560
<v Speaker 1>this setup, and they called it the flying pie pan.

0:12:12.880 --> 0:12:17.520
<v Speaker 1>A December nine issue of Popular Science described some other

0:12:17.640 --> 0:12:20.720
<v Speaker 1>real world attempts at jet pack technology, or at least

0:12:20.760 --> 0:12:24.280
<v Speaker 1>ancestors to jet packs. These were rocket belts also known

0:12:24.360 --> 0:12:28.200
<v Speaker 1>as jump belts, so like the fictional Himmel Schemer, the

0:12:28.280 --> 0:12:31.400
<v Speaker 1>concept was these belts would use rocket power to give

0:12:31.480 --> 0:12:34.120
<v Speaker 1>a boost to a soldier needing to clear an obstacle

0:12:34.559 --> 0:12:38.439
<v Speaker 1>or jump over hazardous terrain. There were some that were

0:12:38.440 --> 0:12:43.520
<v Speaker 1>created by the thecal Chemical Corporation Theicle and I'm probably

0:12:44.240 --> 0:12:47.719
<v Speaker 1>mispronouncing their name, it's th h I O K O L.

0:12:48.559 --> 0:12:52.160
<v Speaker 1>They created the coal jump belts. Uh. These were solid

0:12:52.320 --> 0:12:57.000
<v Speaker 1>fuel rockets strapped to a belt. Uh. There is include

0:12:57.080 --> 0:12:59.560
<v Speaker 1>rockets that would be part of the early Space program

0:12:59.559 --> 0:13:03.120
<v Speaker 1>projects like Gemini and Mercury or Jiminy. If you prefer

0:13:03.679 --> 0:13:06.840
<v Speaker 1>I do not. I prefer Gemini. But the jump belt

0:13:07.480 --> 0:13:11.240
<v Speaker 1>ended up earning a nickname called Grasshopper. The whole idea

0:13:11.280 --> 0:13:14.200
<v Speaker 1>being that again gives a boost to someone who's trying

0:13:14.240 --> 0:13:17.960
<v Speaker 1>to jump over, say, an obstacle. But the project never

0:13:17.960 --> 0:13:22.520
<v Speaker 1>received any funding beyond some early prototypes, so it ultimately

0:13:23.080 --> 0:13:25.280
<v Speaker 1>ended up fading away. It did not go beyond the

0:13:25.280 --> 0:13:28.760
<v Speaker 1>prototype phase. And then there was the flying belt from

0:13:28.840 --> 0:13:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Reaction Motors, which was detailed in that same issue of

0:13:32.160 --> 0:13:35.839
<v Speaker 1>popular Science that talked about the vehicle jump belts. Uh.

0:13:35.880 --> 0:13:38.480
<v Speaker 1>This prototype look like an actual jet pack. It included

0:13:38.520 --> 0:13:42.000
<v Speaker 1>thrusters that you would then extend to either side, so

0:13:42.160 --> 0:13:46.600
<v Speaker 1>they kind of would go behind and uh and beyond

0:13:46.679 --> 0:13:49.280
<v Speaker 1>your shoulders and stick out to the sides a little

0:13:49.280 --> 0:13:53.880
<v Speaker 1>bit pointing downward, obviously, And it also had a couple

0:13:53.920 --> 0:13:55.920
<v Speaker 1>of large canisters on the back and or to hold

0:13:55.960 --> 0:13:59.280
<v Speaker 1>the fuel, because you need fuel to use. These rocket

0:13:59.280 --> 0:14:02.880
<v Speaker 1>thrusters had a hand control that was mounted by an

0:14:03.040 --> 0:14:05.440
<v Speaker 1>arm to the jet pack harness, so it kind of

0:14:05.480 --> 0:14:09.200
<v Speaker 1>came up over one shoulder and then the arm came

0:14:09.280 --> 0:14:12.120
<v Speaker 1>down so that the handle would be right at arm

0:14:12.240 --> 0:14:14.800
<v Speaker 1>level and you would be able to use that to control, say,

0:14:14.840 --> 0:14:17.800
<v Speaker 1>the throttle. But this was a model of the concept

0:14:17.920 --> 0:14:19.840
<v Speaker 1>in Popular Science. It was just a kind of a

0:14:19.920 --> 0:14:22.280
<v Speaker 1>mock up, and it wasn't indicative of an actual working

0:14:22.360 --> 0:14:24.880
<v Speaker 1>jet pack. In fact, the piece said that we were

0:14:24.920 --> 0:14:27.240
<v Speaker 1>at least a couple of years away from a working

0:14:27.320 --> 0:14:29.520
<v Speaker 1>one that would allow you to fly several miles. As

0:14:29.560 --> 0:14:32.760
<v Speaker 1>it turns out, it would take three years before we

0:14:32.800 --> 0:14:35.200
<v Speaker 1>had a working jet pack, and the first one, i'll

0:14:35.280 --> 0:14:37.760
<v Speaker 1>let you go a couple of feet, uh, turns out,

0:14:37.800 --> 0:14:40.240
<v Speaker 1>if you're gonna strap rocket steer back, you tend to

0:14:40.280 --> 0:14:42.360
<v Speaker 1>be a little cautious the first time you take it

0:14:42.360 --> 0:14:45.960
<v Speaker 1>out for a spin. Now, before I jump into the

0:14:46.080 --> 0:14:50.160
<v Speaker 1>jet packs, that really worked figuratively speaking, um, not really

0:14:50.200 --> 0:14:52.120
<v Speaker 1>going to jump into any jet packs at all in

0:14:52.120 --> 0:14:55.640
<v Speaker 1>this episode, sad to say, Let's talk about the problems

0:14:55.640 --> 0:14:58.080
<v Speaker 1>the jet pack has to overcome in order to allow

0:14:58.080 --> 0:14:59.920
<v Speaker 1>a human being to take flight in the first place.

0:15:00.200 --> 0:15:03.320
<v Speaker 1>And these are not trivial problems. The first is that

0:15:03.400 --> 0:15:06.840
<v Speaker 1>we've got this pesky concept called gravity, and we've got

0:15:06.840 --> 0:15:09.440
<v Speaker 1>to deal with that. Gravity is one of the four

0:15:09.720 --> 0:15:13.360
<v Speaker 1>fundamental forces of the universe. It's the weakest of the four.

0:15:13.760 --> 0:15:16.160
<v Speaker 1>A's the one that we aren't really able to incorporate

0:15:16.200 --> 0:15:19.040
<v Speaker 1>into our standard model in a way that makes nice

0:15:19.240 --> 0:15:22.840
<v Speaker 1>clear sense. The other three fundamental forces are the strong

0:15:22.920 --> 0:15:27.480
<v Speaker 1>nuclear force, the weak nuclear force, and electromagnetism. Gravity is

0:15:27.520 --> 0:15:31.280
<v Speaker 1>the force that describes the attraction between any two objects

0:15:31.280 --> 0:15:33.960
<v Speaker 1>that have mass, and I'm talking about any two objects

0:15:34.000 --> 0:15:37.240
<v Speaker 1>in the universe. That's the interesting thing about gravity, because

0:15:37.240 --> 0:15:41.280
<v Speaker 1>technically speaking, you have a gravitational pull on everything else

0:15:41.280 --> 0:15:45.240
<v Speaker 1>in the universe around you that has mass, But gravity

0:15:45.280 --> 0:15:48.840
<v Speaker 1>is a force dependent upon two things, the mass of

0:15:48.880 --> 0:15:52.800
<v Speaker 1>the two respective objects, and then the distance between them.

0:15:52.840 --> 0:15:55.920
<v Speaker 1>The formula to determine the gravitational attraction between any two

0:15:55.920 --> 0:15:59.320
<v Speaker 1>objects goes like this. First, you take the mass of

0:15:59.360 --> 0:16:03.920
<v Speaker 1>the two object x, and you multiply those figures together. So,

0:16:04.280 --> 0:16:06.280
<v Speaker 1>if you're talking about two people, you've been taking the

0:16:06.280 --> 0:16:08.480
<v Speaker 1>mass of two people and multiplying that together and you

0:16:08.520 --> 0:16:11.720
<v Speaker 1>get a figure. Next, you would divide that number by

0:16:11.760 --> 0:16:15.680
<v Speaker 1>the distance between the two masses squared. So if the

0:16:15.720 --> 0:16:18.400
<v Speaker 1>two people are a thousand kilometers apart, you would take

0:16:18.400 --> 0:16:21.240
<v Speaker 1>a thousand kilometers and you would square that. You would

0:16:21.240 --> 0:16:24.920
<v Speaker 1>then divide the product of the two masses by that,

0:16:25.520 --> 0:16:27.920
<v Speaker 1>and that that a result you've got, which I think

0:16:27.960 --> 0:16:30.800
<v Speaker 1>would be what one million kilometers. That's so you end

0:16:30.880 --> 0:16:34.720
<v Speaker 1>up with a very small number. Uh So, the this

0:16:35.440 --> 0:16:38.640
<v Speaker 1>part of the formula already tells us that the greater

0:16:38.720 --> 0:16:42.800
<v Speaker 1>the distance between the two masses, the smaller the gravitational

0:16:42.800 --> 0:16:46.680
<v Speaker 1>effect is going to be between them. Finally, there's a

0:16:46.720 --> 0:16:50.360
<v Speaker 1>gravitational constant that you have to multiply against this number.

0:16:50.840 --> 0:16:54.120
<v Speaker 1>This was determined by Newton's law of universal gravitation, and

0:16:54.120 --> 0:16:57.400
<v Speaker 1>the constant in case you're curious, is six point six

0:16:57.560 --> 0:17:00.760
<v Speaker 1>seven four times ten to the minus a leventh power

0:17:01.240 --> 0:17:05.679
<v Speaker 1>meters cubed per kilogram per second squared. Now, the important

0:17:05.680 --> 0:17:08.400
<v Speaker 1>thing to remember is you need this constant to make

0:17:08.400 --> 0:17:10.439
<v Speaker 1>the math work out properly. We're not going to go

0:17:10.480 --> 0:17:14.320
<v Speaker 1>into greater detail of where this constant came from because

0:17:14.760 --> 0:17:17.720
<v Speaker 1>it gets super complicated, but we multiply this times the

0:17:17.760 --> 0:17:20.200
<v Speaker 1>result we got before, and what you end up with

0:17:20.480 --> 0:17:23.280
<v Speaker 1>is a figure that describes the force of gravitational attraction

0:17:23.320 --> 0:17:27.520
<v Speaker 1>between those two masses. So for relatively small masses, this

0:17:27.640 --> 0:17:30.359
<v Speaker 1>attraction is so weak that we can ignore it. So

0:17:30.400 --> 0:17:32.840
<v Speaker 1>while it is true that I have a gravitational pull

0:17:32.920 --> 0:17:36.240
<v Speaker 1>on all of you listening right now, it's so weak

0:17:36.520 --> 0:17:40.399
<v Speaker 1>that you can just ignore that. It's it's the gravitational

0:17:40.440 --> 0:17:42.680
<v Speaker 1>pull to a pencil that is close to you is

0:17:42.720 --> 0:17:45.560
<v Speaker 1>greater than the gravitational pull I have on you, unless

0:17:45.560 --> 0:17:47.480
<v Speaker 1>you're sitting really really close to me right now, in

0:17:47.480 --> 0:17:52.239
<v Speaker 1>which case back off, man. I'm a scientist. But if

0:17:52.280 --> 0:17:55.560
<v Speaker 1>one of those masses is considerably large and the distance

0:17:55.760 --> 0:17:59.920
<v Speaker 1>is relatively small between the two masses, that gravitational attraction

0:18:00.000 --> 0:18:04.000
<v Speaker 1>can be significant, such as the attraction between Earth, and

0:18:04.480 --> 0:18:09.600
<v Speaker 1>you know people on Earth. Now we're gonna talk more

0:18:09.640 --> 0:18:12.320
<v Speaker 1>about gravity and how we can overcome it in just

0:18:12.440 --> 0:18:15.159
<v Speaker 1>a second. But before I do that, let's take a

0:18:15.280 --> 0:18:25.760
<v Speaker 1>quick break to thank our sponsor. So, here on Earth,

0:18:26.080 --> 0:18:29.440
<v Speaker 1>the acceleration of gravity is nine point eight meters per

0:18:29.440 --> 0:18:32.240
<v Speaker 1>second per second. At least that's the value of the

0:18:32.280 --> 0:18:35.520
<v Speaker 1>acceleration of gravity at sea level here on Earth. Because

0:18:35.560 --> 0:18:37.800
<v Speaker 1>remember I talked about how the force of gravity is

0:18:37.840 --> 0:18:42.840
<v Speaker 1>dependent upon partly upon the distance between two centers of mass. Uh,

0:18:43.040 --> 0:18:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Since that magnitude depends upon that distance, the acceleration of

0:18:46.960 --> 0:18:52.720
<v Speaker 1>gravity decreases as you climb in elevation. It's actually lower.

0:18:53.480 --> 0:18:56.160
<v Speaker 1>But for most practical applications, it's fine to say nine

0:18:56.160 --> 0:18:58.800
<v Speaker 1>point eight meters per second per second, because the difference

0:18:58.880 --> 0:19:02.120
<v Speaker 1>is for again, for most practical applications are so small

0:19:02.160 --> 0:19:05.199
<v Speaker 1>as to not really be that that important. They're not

0:19:05.200 --> 0:19:07.680
<v Speaker 1>going to make a world of difference for what we're

0:19:07.680 --> 0:19:10.800
<v Speaker 1>talking about. So if you want to slip the surly

0:19:10.920 --> 0:19:14.680
<v Speaker 1>bonds of Earth and dance the skies on laughter, silvered

0:19:14.720 --> 0:19:17.800
<v Speaker 1>wings points to whomever can tell me what that's a

0:19:17.840 --> 0:19:21.280
<v Speaker 1>reference to. You need to create enough force to counteract

0:19:21.280 --> 0:19:25.560
<v Speaker 1>the gravitational pull you experience here on the ground. So

0:19:25.640 --> 0:19:29.600
<v Speaker 1>you need something has a good thrust to weight ratio,

0:19:29.800 --> 0:19:32.720
<v Speaker 1>meaning you need a mechanism that can provide enough thrust

0:19:32.960 --> 0:19:36.600
<v Speaker 1>downwards to nullify the effects of gravity and allow you

0:19:36.640 --> 0:19:39.000
<v Speaker 1>to climb into the air. This ratio has to be

0:19:39.080 --> 0:19:41.720
<v Speaker 1>greater than one, and it means that the thrust must

0:19:41.760 --> 0:19:44.080
<v Speaker 1>be more than the mass of the object you want

0:19:44.119 --> 0:19:47.120
<v Speaker 1>to send into the air, namely, you plus your jet

0:19:47.119 --> 0:19:52.520
<v Speaker 1>pack multiplied by nine point eight one. Now, let's complicate

0:19:52.600 --> 0:19:55.919
<v Speaker 1>things a little bit. In popular culture, you'll see characters

0:19:56.000 --> 0:20:00.480
<v Speaker 1>use jetbacks to do amazing aerobatics and maneuvers. Characters like

0:20:00.480 --> 0:20:03.200
<v Speaker 1>the Rocketeer can fly like a bullet to another location,

0:20:03.280 --> 0:20:07.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of like Superman. This, unfortunately, is not realistic, and

0:20:07.000 --> 0:20:10.720
<v Speaker 1>that's because we humans don't have bodies that can really

0:20:10.800 --> 0:20:15.000
<v Speaker 1>generate lift. Now, for aircraft, lift is the force that

0:20:15.040 --> 0:20:18.720
<v Speaker 1>opposes the weight of an airplane or a helicopter. Clearly,

0:20:18.760 --> 0:20:22.320
<v Speaker 1>they're not shooting any kind of thrust straight down in

0:20:22.440 --> 0:20:24.840
<v Speaker 1>order to maintain height, unless it's a vt O L.

0:20:25.520 --> 0:20:28.919
<v Speaker 1>Helicopter kind of is, but an airplane's not. So. For

0:20:28.960 --> 0:20:31.720
<v Speaker 1>a plane, the wings generate the bulk of lift. Although

0:20:31.760 --> 0:20:34.560
<v Speaker 1>the entire body is responsible for lift, it's the wings

0:20:34.560 --> 0:20:37.200
<v Speaker 1>that have the majority of this. And this is an

0:20:37.200 --> 0:20:41.359
<v Speaker 1>aerodynamic force is dependent upon the atmosphere. If we didn't

0:20:41.359 --> 0:20:43.800
<v Speaker 1>have an atmosphere, lift would not be a factor. You

0:20:43.840 --> 0:20:47.159
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be able to fly. So this is one of

0:20:47.200 --> 0:20:50.080
<v Speaker 1>the reasons why places like Mars, which has a very

0:20:50.080 --> 0:20:53.080
<v Speaker 1>thin atmosphere, it would be very difficult to fly through

0:20:53.400 --> 0:20:56.280
<v Speaker 1>mars atmosphere just because there's not a whole lot of

0:20:56.320 --> 0:20:59.879
<v Speaker 1>density there. Now Earth has a nice dense atmosphere. Flight

0:21:00.040 --> 0:21:04.320
<v Speaker 1>means you're flying through a fluid because the gas typically

0:21:04.400 --> 0:21:08.440
<v Speaker 1>is described as fluid. We would say fluid dynamics play

0:21:08.480 --> 0:21:13.040
<v Speaker 1>apart here. Lift is directed perpendicular to the flow direction.

0:21:13.520 --> 0:21:16.280
<v Speaker 1>So think of an airplane wing. UH an airplane wing

0:21:16.320 --> 0:21:18.640
<v Speaker 1>as it's flying through the air, the flow of atmosphere

0:21:19.119 --> 0:21:22.520
<v Speaker 1>is across the wing, both above and below it. The

0:21:22.560 --> 0:21:25.160
<v Speaker 1>direction of lift is up. It's a ninety degree angle

0:21:25.280 --> 0:21:28.800
<v Speaker 1>from the flow direction. Lift is generated when a fluid

0:21:28.920 --> 0:21:31.639
<v Speaker 1>is turned by a solid object, and lift is a

0:21:31.680 --> 0:21:35.439
<v Speaker 1>force that's in opposite direction to that turn. Now, this

0:21:35.520 --> 0:21:38.399
<v Speaker 1>is in line with Newton's third law of action and reaction.

0:21:38.480 --> 0:21:41.080
<v Speaker 1>There has to be a motion between the object and

0:21:41.119 --> 0:21:43.199
<v Speaker 1>the fluid. So in other words, the wing has to

0:21:43.240 --> 0:21:46.760
<v Speaker 1>travel at a different speed than the air it's moving through.

0:21:47.119 --> 0:21:49.800
<v Speaker 1>If you had incredibly strong winds, I mean, like super

0:21:49.840 --> 0:21:52.640
<v Speaker 1>strong blowing in the same direction as a plane that's

0:21:52.680 --> 0:21:55.320
<v Speaker 1>trying to take off, the plane would not be able

0:21:55.359 --> 0:21:57.280
<v Speaker 1>to get off the ground because the air and the

0:21:57.320 --> 0:21:59.560
<v Speaker 1>wings would be moving at the same speed. You have

0:21:59.640 --> 0:22:03.280
<v Speaker 1>to have a difference in velocity in order to generate lift. Now,

0:22:03.320 --> 0:22:06.479
<v Speaker 1>to go deeply into the concept of lift would require

0:22:06.480 --> 0:22:10.320
<v Speaker 1>a discussion of the work of Danielle Bernowley and Isaac Newton,

0:22:10.560 --> 0:22:12.399
<v Speaker 1>and it would take a long time because there are

0:22:12.400 --> 0:22:15.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of misconceptions about lift. There are a lot

0:22:15.440 --> 0:22:18.800
<v Speaker 1>of of uh hypotheses that have been talked about that

0:22:18.920 --> 0:22:22.040
<v Speaker 1>are kind of correct but not really correct, and it

0:22:22.200 --> 0:22:24.600
<v Speaker 1>just that's a whole episode on itself. So let's just

0:22:24.640 --> 0:22:27.240
<v Speaker 1>cut to the chase. The human body does not have

0:22:27.320 --> 0:22:31.000
<v Speaker 1>a shape conducive to generating lift, So to stay up

0:22:31.040 --> 0:22:35.440
<v Speaker 1>in the air, you have to consistently apply thrust downwards

0:22:35.480 --> 0:22:39.440
<v Speaker 1>to counteract gravity. You can't just turn the thrusters directly

0:22:39.520 --> 0:22:43.400
<v Speaker 1>behind you and then shoot off into the distance. Otherwise

0:22:43.520 --> 0:22:46.919
<v Speaker 1>you would just come crashing down. The only way you

0:22:46.960 --> 0:22:50.399
<v Speaker 1>could avoid this is if you were moving forward fast

0:22:50.480 --> 0:22:53.199
<v Speaker 1>enough so that as you fall, you're falling at the

0:22:53.240 --> 0:22:57.360
<v Speaker 1>same rate as the Earth's surface is curving away from you.

0:22:57.720 --> 0:23:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Because you're moving forward that fast. Uh, the Earth is

0:23:01.040 --> 0:23:05.520
<v Speaker 1>a sphere. Just news flashed any out there who were

0:23:05.560 --> 0:23:07.960
<v Speaker 1>not aware of this, So you'd have to be going

0:23:08.000 --> 0:23:10.200
<v Speaker 1>wicked fast. You'd have to be going just as fast

0:23:10.400 --> 0:23:12.439
<v Speaker 1>as the Earth is falling away from you. There's actually

0:23:12.440 --> 0:23:17.040
<v Speaker 1>a name for this particular type of falling. It's called orbit.

0:23:17.880 --> 0:23:20.119
<v Speaker 1>But there's no way you would ever achieve a speed

0:23:20.280 --> 0:23:23.439
<v Speaker 1>that incredible using a jet pack. And still, you know,

0:23:24.440 --> 0:23:27.320
<v Speaker 1>keep all your skin on you. So even if you

0:23:27.359 --> 0:23:29.760
<v Speaker 1>had an incredible jet pack in the classic design we

0:23:29.800 --> 0:23:31.640
<v Speaker 1>all think of, you would not be able to fly

0:23:31.760 --> 0:23:34.400
<v Speaker 1>like Superman, because you would steadily fall to the Earth

0:23:34.480 --> 0:23:37.760
<v Speaker 1>until you crashed or you managed to maneuver to apply

0:23:37.840 --> 0:23:40.160
<v Speaker 1>your thrust to counteract gravity. So, in other words, you're

0:23:40.200 --> 0:23:43.320
<v Speaker 1>back in a standing position. If you watched people use

0:23:43.440 --> 0:23:45.679
<v Speaker 1>various types of jet packs, you've probably seen people in

0:23:45.720 --> 0:23:48.520
<v Speaker 1>more or less this upright position, almost as if they

0:23:48.520 --> 0:23:51.919
<v Speaker 1>are standing on solid ground and moving slowly around that way,

0:23:52.240 --> 0:23:56.000
<v Speaker 1>and the limitations around lift are the reason for this. Now,

0:23:56.000 --> 0:24:00.080
<v Speaker 1>there are exceptions. There are wings suits that incorporate a

0:24:00.200 --> 0:24:03.439
<v Speaker 1>jet pack or rocket pack design that can provide lift

0:24:03.520 --> 0:24:06.639
<v Speaker 1>due to their designs. Uh. These are like souped up

0:24:06.680 --> 0:24:10.080
<v Speaker 1>hang gliders almost, and that's a little bit different than

0:24:10.119 --> 0:24:13.440
<v Speaker 1>the jet packs, say Moba set wears in the Star

0:24:13.480 --> 0:24:15.959
<v Speaker 1>Wars series. But there are people who have pulled off

0:24:16.000 --> 0:24:19.399
<v Speaker 1>some amazing stunts using jet packs with a wing design,

0:24:19.480 --> 0:24:22.000
<v Speaker 1>so we'll get to those a little bit later. Now,

0:24:22.040 --> 0:24:25.440
<v Speaker 1>another big limitation with jet packs is where they get

0:24:25.480 --> 0:24:28.919
<v Speaker 1>the energy to create all that thrust. Jet Packs need

0:24:29.000 --> 0:24:33.920
<v Speaker 1>fuel or potentially some other energy source like batteries. But honestly,

0:24:34.000 --> 0:24:36.040
<v Speaker 1>to get the power they need, fuel tends to be

0:24:36.080 --> 0:24:39.720
<v Speaker 1>the way, so fuel or batteries doesn't really matter. That

0:24:39.800 --> 0:24:42.960
<v Speaker 1>represents more weight, so that adds to the overall weight

0:24:43.000 --> 0:24:46.040
<v Speaker 1>that you need to get off the ground. This is

0:24:46.080 --> 0:24:49.160
<v Speaker 1>the sort of stuff that rocket scientists deal with all

0:24:49.200 --> 0:24:51.560
<v Speaker 1>the time. It's one thing to calculate the thrust you

0:24:51.600 --> 0:24:54.760
<v Speaker 1>need to get an empty rocket off the launchpad, but

0:24:54.800 --> 0:24:57.000
<v Speaker 1>then you start adding that fuel in there, and suddenly

0:24:57.000 --> 0:24:59.119
<v Speaker 1>the rocket is much heavier. It's not just the rocket,

0:24:59.200 --> 0:25:01.439
<v Speaker 1>is the rocket plus the fuel. That means you have

0:25:01.480 --> 0:25:04.640
<v Speaker 1>to have even more thrust to lift the full rocket

0:25:05.280 --> 0:25:09.200
<v Speaker 1>filled up completely with fuel. While a human being obviously

0:25:09.240 --> 0:25:12.280
<v Speaker 1>ways significantly less than a rocket, you still have to

0:25:12.320 --> 0:25:15.160
<v Speaker 1>factor in things like fuel weight or battery weight when

0:25:15.200 --> 0:25:18.000
<v Speaker 1>calculating the amount of thrust you'll need to get someone airborne,

0:25:18.640 --> 0:25:21.000
<v Speaker 1>and you want enough thrust to have a nice, smooth

0:25:21.080 --> 0:25:24.600
<v Speaker 1>lunch rather than you know, shooting someone off dozens of

0:25:24.640 --> 0:25:27.000
<v Speaker 1>feet into the air with little warning. At least I

0:25:27.320 --> 0:25:31.840
<v Speaker 1>hope that's what you want. Finding a good balance between

0:25:32.119 --> 0:25:35.480
<v Speaker 1>fuel weight and flight time is also tricky. For a

0:25:35.520 --> 0:25:37.800
<v Speaker 1>long time, a lot of jet packs had a maximum

0:25:37.840 --> 0:25:41.320
<v Speaker 1>flight time of around thirty seconds maybe a minute, which

0:25:41.359 --> 0:25:44.560
<v Speaker 1>isn't really that great, but it's because a longer flight

0:25:44.600 --> 0:25:47.560
<v Speaker 1>time would require more fuel, which again, as we know,

0:25:47.680 --> 0:25:51.280
<v Speaker 1>adds more weight, which means you need more powerful thrusters

0:25:51.280 --> 0:25:54.160
<v Speaker 1>which are going to burn fuel through fuel faster, and

0:25:54.240 --> 0:25:57.560
<v Speaker 1>so you can keep chasing these equations. Now these days,

0:25:57.960 --> 0:26:00.320
<v Speaker 1>you can find jet packs that have a much longer

0:26:00.400 --> 0:26:03.880
<v Speaker 1>flight time, up to maybe ten or twelve minutes, which

0:26:03.920 --> 0:26:07.879
<v Speaker 1>is pretty impressive considering that before the maximum was about

0:26:07.880 --> 0:26:11.760
<v Speaker 1>thirty seconds. It's still not a long time to be

0:26:11.800 --> 0:26:13.960
<v Speaker 1>able to fly around, but it's much better than it

0:26:14.080 --> 0:26:17.240
<v Speaker 1>used to be. So if you're using a device that

0:26:17.280 --> 0:26:20.439
<v Speaker 1>consumes fuel, then the safety of that fuel also becomes

0:26:20.440 --> 0:26:23.679
<v Speaker 1>a big concern. After all, we get energy from fuel

0:26:24.280 --> 0:26:27.280
<v Speaker 1>by burning it, you know, combustible fuel. So if you

0:26:27.280 --> 0:26:29.680
<v Speaker 1>put on a backpack that's going to shoot you into

0:26:29.680 --> 0:26:34.040
<v Speaker 1>the air while simultaneously combusting a flammable fuel source, that's

0:26:34.080 --> 0:26:37.080
<v Speaker 1>a little intimidating. It's something you have to take into consideration.

0:26:37.119 --> 0:26:39.960
<v Speaker 1>You have to have safety measures there, which also adds

0:26:40.080 --> 0:26:44.280
<v Speaker 1>typically more weight. There are other limitations to jet packs

0:26:44.280 --> 0:26:46.520
<v Speaker 1>are loud. If you want to strap one on, you

0:26:46.680 --> 0:26:49.600
<v Speaker 1>probably also want to wear some sort of ear protection

0:26:50.119 --> 0:26:52.960
<v Speaker 1>or you're gonna risk damaging your hearing. And you want

0:26:52.960 --> 0:26:55.560
<v Speaker 1>to keep your distance from other people, not just because

0:26:55.560 --> 0:26:58.919
<v Speaker 1>your thrusters might be shooting out hot exhaust or winds

0:26:58.960 --> 0:27:01.320
<v Speaker 1>at high speeds, but also because you wouldn't want to

0:27:01.359 --> 0:27:05.600
<v Speaker 1>harm anyone with all that noise you're generating. So why

0:27:05.600 --> 0:27:09.320
<v Speaker 1>haven't we seen more work to make jet packs quieters, safer,

0:27:09.359 --> 0:27:12.760
<v Speaker 1>and more efficient. Why why are they so far behind

0:27:13.200 --> 0:27:16.520
<v Speaker 1>compared to some other technologies. One large part is because

0:27:16.520 --> 0:27:19.000
<v Speaker 1>there's not really a market for jet packs not a

0:27:19.040 --> 0:27:21.960
<v Speaker 1>big one anyway, and that means there's very little money

0:27:22.000 --> 0:27:24.400
<v Speaker 1>to continue the R and D work on a large scale.

0:27:24.800 --> 0:27:26.879
<v Speaker 1>A lot of the prototypes that have come out have

0:27:26.960 --> 0:27:30.480
<v Speaker 1>been sort of passion projects by eccentrics who happen to

0:27:30.480 --> 0:27:33.800
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of money and a desire to have

0:27:34.280 --> 0:27:37.440
<v Speaker 1>uh an engine strapped to their back that will push

0:27:37.520 --> 0:27:40.520
<v Speaker 1>them through the air like a maniac. Uh what. I'm

0:27:40.520 --> 0:27:44.360
<v Speaker 1>thankful for them, but they are kind of crazy. The

0:27:44.400 --> 0:27:48.160
<v Speaker 1>other source tends to be things like the Defense Department

0:27:48.240 --> 0:27:51.480
<v Speaker 1>that might have some money set aside for these sorts

0:27:51.480 --> 0:27:53.760
<v Speaker 1>of projects, but otherwise you don't really have a market

0:27:53.800 --> 0:27:58.240
<v Speaker 1>for them. Consumer market for jet packs has only recently

0:27:58.880 --> 0:28:02.400
<v Speaker 1>become a possible, and even then just for people who

0:28:02.400 --> 0:28:07.760
<v Speaker 1>are phil they rich not grubby little podcast here like myself,

0:28:09.320 --> 0:28:11.840
<v Speaker 1>And considering how challenging it must be to keep a

0:28:11.920 --> 0:28:14.200
<v Speaker 1>jet pack in the air and keep the pilot safe,

0:28:14.240 --> 0:28:17.480
<v Speaker 1>it's probably for the best, all right. So let's talk

0:28:17.480 --> 0:28:19.880
<v Speaker 1>about some of the early attempts to make jet packs

0:28:19.960 --> 0:28:23.359
<v Speaker 1>leading up to the kinds that are being developed today.

0:28:23.400 --> 0:28:27.520
<v Speaker 1>So here's another dive into the history of jet packs

0:28:27.560 --> 0:28:32.080
<v Speaker 1>that actually we're working and we're real windle more of

0:28:32.160 --> 0:28:36.400
<v Speaker 1>Bell Arrow Systems created the Bell Rocket Belt, which used

0:28:36.480 --> 0:28:40.240
<v Speaker 1>hydrogen peroxide as rocket fuel, which is useful and that

0:28:40.520 --> 0:28:44.600
<v Speaker 1>it's not explosive, so you don't have to worry about that. Uh,

0:28:44.640 --> 0:28:47.160
<v Speaker 1>And it's safe for a jet pack where to carry around.

0:28:47.680 --> 0:28:51.760
<v Speaker 1>And it was impressive for its time. It worked, it

0:28:51.800 --> 0:28:54.720
<v Speaker 1>did not work for very long. The maximum flight time

0:28:54.760 --> 0:28:57.959
<v Speaker 1>was about twenty one seconds. The belt had three tanks

0:28:58.000 --> 0:29:01.600
<v Speaker 1>mounted on a fiberglass course, which I'm sure was very slimming.

0:29:02.480 --> 0:29:05.760
<v Speaker 1>And they called it a belt instead of a corset,

0:29:06.240 --> 0:29:09.040
<v Speaker 1>I assume because maybe they thought that otherwise it would

0:29:09.120 --> 0:29:12.120
<v Speaker 1>be bad pr The left and right tanks had a

0:29:13.040 --> 0:29:17.479
<v Speaker 1>hydrogen peroxide mix and the center tank contained nitrogen gas.

0:29:17.840 --> 0:29:20.920
<v Speaker 1>So the nitrogen was used to force the hydrogen peroxide

0:29:20.960 --> 0:29:24.800
<v Speaker 1>into a catalyst and that would end up creating this

0:29:24.960 --> 0:29:30.040
<v Speaker 1>chemical mixture of water oxygen and generate a lot of heat.

0:29:30.080 --> 0:29:32.000
<v Speaker 1>And it was all under a great deal of pressure.

0:29:32.560 --> 0:29:36.680
<v Speaker 1>The belt created two hundred eighty pounds of thrust. The

0:29:36.720 --> 0:29:40.520
<v Speaker 1>first successful untethered test flight of the Bell Rocket Belt

0:29:41.080 --> 0:29:44.360
<v Speaker 1>was in the nineteen sixties. The flight lasted for fourteen

0:29:44.440 --> 0:29:47.760
<v Speaker 1>seconds and Harold Graham, the pilot, hit a top speed

0:29:47.800 --> 0:29:51.840
<v Speaker 1>of six miles per hour, a blistering speed, and traveled

0:29:51.880 --> 0:29:56.040
<v Speaker 1>thirty ft. A public demonstration saw him fly for ten seconds,

0:29:56.280 --> 0:29:59.000
<v Speaker 1>flying over a truck at about fifteen feet and traveling

0:29:59.000 --> 0:30:01.560
<v Speaker 1>a hundred fifty ft in distance at about ten miles

0:30:01.560 --> 0:30:04.680
<v Speaker 1>per hour, and more tests revealed that on a typical flight,

0:30:05.080 --> 0:30:08.480
<v Speaker 1>about ten seconds would be required to make a safe landing.

0:30:09.000 --> 0:30:11.960
<v Speaker 1>So if you need ten seconds to land and you've

0:30:11.960 --> 0:30:14.880
<v Speaker 1>got a maximum flight time about twenty one seconds, it

0:30:15.000 --> 0:30:17.640
<v Speaker 1>really limited how much you could actually do and a go.

0:30:18.280 --> 0:30:21.880
<v Speaker 1>So when ten seconds of fuel remained, the pilot's helmet

0:30:21.880 --> 0:30:24.720
<v Speaker 1>would begin to beep, so it would be an alert saying, hey,

0:30:24.760 --> 0:30:28.160
<v Speaker 1>you better start your landing procedure now, because in a

0:30:28.280 --> 0:30:30.880
<v Speaker 1>very short time you will not have that option, and

0:30:30.920 --> 0:30:34.440
<v Speaker 1>we're coming down whether you're ready or not. One of

0:30:34.480 --> 0:30:36.480
<v Speaker 1>the test pilots for the Bell Rocket Belt was a

0:30:36.480 --> 0:30:39.520
<v Speaker 1>guy named Bill Suitor. Suitor would go on to fly

0:30:39.640 --> 0:30:42.760
<v Speaker 1>the jet pack as a stunt double for Sean Connery

0:30:42.880 --> 0:30:47.200
<v Speaker 1>in a little movie called Thunderball. Gordon Yeager was also

0:30:47.200 --> 0:30:49.719
<v Speaker 1>a stunt pilot of the Belt in some shots, so

0:30:49.760 --> 0:30:54.080
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't just Bill Suitor. H Then you also have

0:30:54.200 --> 0:30:58.720
<v Speaker 1>Robert Quarter who also worked on the jet flying belt,

0:30:59.280 --> 0:31:02.880
<v Speaker 1>which used a w R nineteen fan jet engine from

0:31:02.920 --> 0:31:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Williams International. That would make this a true jet pack,

0:31:07.360 --> 0:31:09.360
<v Speaker 1>but they still called it a belt at the time,

0:31:10.240 --> 0:31:13.160
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to a courset. This was a project funded

0:31:13.200 --> 0:31:17.240
<v Speaker 1>by the Advanced Research Projects Agency, also known as ARPA.

0:31:17.840 --> 0:31:21.640
<v Speaker 1>That's the same agency that funded the development of technologies

0:31:21.680 --> 0:31:25.680
<v Speaker 1>that would later become the underlying tech of the Internet itself.

0:31:25.800 --> 0:31:29.280
<v Speaker 1>So the reason we have the Internet largely is because

0:31:29.600 --> 0:31:33.920
<v Speaker 1>of ARPA. They funded a project called Arpanet, which some

0:31:34.040 --> 0:31:36.960
<v Speaker 1>call the grandfather to the Internet. It's definitely true that

0:31:37.200 --> 0:31:40.080
<v Speaker 1>the people who worked on Arpanet started to develop the

0:31:40.080 --> 0:31:43.200
<v Speaker 1>protocols that would end up being the backbone of the

0:31:43.240 --> 0:31:47.600
<v Speaker 1>Internet itself. Now, this jet flying belt was the product

0:31:47.720 --> 0:31:51.520
<v Speaker 1>of John K. Hilbert and Wendell F. Moore. So we're

0:31:51.560 --> 0:31:56.040
<v Speaker 1>back to talking about more again. Now More had worked

0:31:56.120 --> 0:32:00.320
<v Speaker 1>on the rocket belt that bell Aero Systems was looking

0:32:00.360 --> 0:32:03.240
<v Speaker 1>at a few years earlier. Now they were looking at

0:32:03.280 --> 0:32:07.680
<v Speaker 1>a fan based belt, a fan jet engine belt, so

0:32:07.720 --> 0:32:11.479
<v Speaker 1>they're moving away from rockets to jet engines um And

0:32:11.520 --> 0:32:14.120
<v Speaker 1>it definitely looked like a jet pack. It was large

0:32:14.160 --> 0:32:16.880
<v Speaker 1>and bulky with thrusters that would extend out to the sides.

0:32:17.200 --> 0:32:20.160
<v Speaker 1>It kind of looked like oversized shoulders behind the pilot

0:32:20.680 --> 0:32:23.640
<v Speaker 1>um or a little bit like exhaust pipes that you

0:32:23.640 --> 0:32:26.720
<v Speaker 1>would see like the exhaust hose that you see out

0:32:26.720 --> 0:32:28.280
<v Speaker 1>of the back of a of a dryer and a

0:32:28.320 --> 0:32:31.520
<v Speaker 1>washer dryer, but or you know, just some ducting. That's

0:32:31.520 --> 0:32:33.640
<v Speaker 1>what kind of what it looked like. Quarter was able

0:32:33.640 --> 0:32:36.479
<v Speaker 1>to fly to an altitude of about seven meters and

0:32:36.520 --> 0:32:39.080
<v Speaker 1>he hit top speeds of forty five kilometers an hour.

0:32:39.480 --> 0:32:42.360
<v Speaker 1>And the big events here was that it was in

0:32:42.440 --> 0:32:44.960
<v Speaker 1>fact a jet belt, not a rocket belt, So I

0:32:45.040 --> 0:32:47.680
<v Speaker 1>was using that real jet engine to generate thrust rather

0:32:47.720 --> 0:32:50.080
<v Speaker 1>than busting rocket fuel, which meant that you didn't have

0:32:50.120 --> 0:32:53.680
<v Speaker 1>that super hot exhaust like you did with the rocket belts,

0:32:53.720 --> 0:32:57.040
<v Speaker 1>and that could make it a little safer to operate,

0:32:57.400 --> 0:32:59.160
<v Speaker 1>at least in the sense that you're not likely to

0:32:59.200 --> 0:33:05.160
<v Speaker 1>set yourself on fire right away. Brad Barker partnered with

0:33:05.360 --> 0:33:08.120
<v Speaker 1>a guy named Joe Wright and another guy named Larry

0:33:08.160 --> 0:33:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Stanley to build a new rocket belt, and they based

0:33:11.560 --> 0:33:15.280
<v Speaker 1>it off of Wendell Moore's design, but this time they

0:33:15.280 --> 0:33:17.800
<v Speaker 1>were using lighter components and they were using more fuel

0:33:18.000 --> 0:33:20.640
<v Speaker 1>and in this way, they were able to create a

0:33:20.800 --> 0:33:24.080
<v Speaker 1>jet belt that would uh actually or a rocket belt

0:33:24.120 --> 0:33:26.959
<v Speaker 1>I should say, that would actually allow for longer flying

0:33:27.000 --> 0:33:30.160
<v Speaker 1>times because it was less weight and more fuel. They

0:33:30.200 --> 0:33:32.320
<v Speaker 1>even got Bill Suitor to test fly it, so the

0:33:32.320 --> 0:33:35.520
<v Speaker 1>same guy who test flew the previous rocket belt that

0:33:35.520 --> 0:33:40.000
<v Speaker 1>William Moore had made. But this story it ends up

0:33:40.040 --> 0:33:44.720
<v Speaker 1>getting very kind of crazy and tragic. It's one of

0:33:44.760 --> 0:33:47.600
<v Speaker 1>those stories that when you read it, it seems impossible

0:33:47.640 --> 0:33:52.000
<v Speaker 1>to believe it first because it's so unusual. So you

0:33:52.080 --> 0:33:56.440
<v Speaker 1>have Brad Barker and Larry Stanley. They have a disagreement

0:33:56.760 --> 0:34:01.200
<v Speaker 1>that escalated, and then it escalated to the point of violence.

0:34:01.440 --> 0:34:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Brad Barker actually attacked Larry Stanley with a hammer, so

0:34:06.160 --> 0:34:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Barker was arrested for assault and Stanley in the lawsuit

0:34:10.400 --> 0:34:13.400
<v Speaker 1>one ownership of the rocket belt, which was called the

0:34:13.560 --> 0:34:17.200
<v Speaker 1>RB two thousand. So Larry Stanley goes to claim the

0:34:17.239 --> 0:34:21.080
<v Speaker 1>device from Barker's shop, but he finds that when he

0:34:21.120 --> 0:34:26.120
<v Speaker 1>gets there, both Brad Barker and the device have gone missing.

0:34:26.719 --> 0:34:30.200
<v Speaker 1>So Larry Stanley tracks down the other partner, Joe Right,

0:34:30.840 --> 0:34:33.760
<v Speaker 1>to find out if Joe Wright knows where Brad Barker

0:34:33.960 --> 0:34:38.359
<v Speaker 1>had gone off to but when he finds Joe right,

0:34:38.440 --> 0:34:41.520
<v Speaker 1>Joe Wright is dead. He had been beaten to death.

0:34:42.120 --> 0:34:45.839
<v Speaker 1>Larry Stanley eventually would find Brad Barker, would take him

0:34:45.840 --> 0:34:51.240
<v Speaker 1>to court and win a ten million dollar UH reward.

0:34:51.280 --> 0:34:54.200
<v Speaker 1>I guess or or you know. Barker was fined ten

0:34:54.239 --> 0:34:56.759
<v Speaker 1>million dollars by the judge and was supposed to be

0:34:56.760 --> 0:35:00.440
<v Speaker 1>paid to Stanley, but Barker refused to pay Stanley. So

0:35:00.520 --> 0:35:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Stanley goes finds Barker, grabs him, shoves him in a box,

0:35:06.320 --> 0:35:10.840
<v Speaker 1>and holds him for eight days until Barker managed to escape.

0:35:11.160 --> 0:35:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Police would then arrest Larry Stanley on kidnapping charges, and

0:35:15.560 --> 0:35:20.880
<v Speaker 1>the RB two thousand never turned up. It was lost. Uh.

0:35:22.000 --> 0:35:25.320
<v Speaker 1>Who knows where it is? Maybe Brad Barker. Who's to say?

0:35:25.680 --> 0:35:29.680
<v Speaker 1>That's a pretty crazy story. Now there are other jet

0:35:29.680 --> 0:35:32.720
<v Speaker 1>packs we can talk about some that that really aren't

0:35:32.760 --> 0:35:35.560
<v Speaker 1>jet packs, their rocket packs, because jets wouldn't work in

0:35:35.600 --> 0:35:37.960
<v Speaker 1>the situations that were used in like e v A

0:35:38.160 --> 0:35:42.800
<v Speaker 1>jet packs. These are rocket packs or rocket belts uh,

0:35:42.840 --> 0:35:45.800
<v Speaker 1>and they're meant for extra vehicular activities e v A

0:35:46.000 --> 0:35:49.920
<v Speaker 1>s for space vehicles, so spacewalks is what we're talking

0:35:49.920 --> 0:35:54.000
<v Speaker 1>about here. So clearly jets would not work in space.

0:35:54.040 --> 0:35:57.200
<v Speaker 1>There's no air for you to use to create thrust,

0:35:57.800 --> 0:36:00.759
<v Speaker 1>so you would need to have rockets instead. There was

0:36:00.800 --> 0:36:06.080
<v Speaker 1>an early such rocket pack meant for astronauts. It was

0:36:06.160 --> 0:36:10.320
<v Speaker 1>referred to as the Manned Maneuvering Unit or m m U,

0:36:11.160 --> 0:36:14.200
<v Speaker 1>developed by NASA in the nineteen eighties, specifically for Space

0:36:14.200 --> 0:36:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Shuttle missions UH. It was the descendant of a previous

0:36:18.400 --> 0:36:20.960
<v Speaker 1>project that the US Air Force had been working on

0:36:21.080 --> 0:36:24.160
<v Speaker 1>that was known as the Astronaut Maneuvering Unit or a

0:36:24.400 --> 0:36:28.360
<v Speaker 1>m U. Later on, NASA would develop a smaller system

0:36:28.400 --> 0:36:32.239
<v Speaker 1>called the Simplified AID for e V A Rescue, which

0:36:32.280 --> 0:36:36.759
<v Speaker 1>had the acronym SAFER, and that intended use was for

0:36:36.840 --> 0:36:40.560
<v Speaker 1>emergency rescue of astronauts during spacewalks, rather than as a

0:36:40.600 --> 0:36:44.080
<v Speaker 1>means of propulsion. In general, the mm us were only

0:36:44.160 --> 0:36:47.600
<v Speaker 1>used on three missions. NASA determined that there are alternative

0:36:47.600 --> 0:36:51.160
<v Speaker 1>means of allowing astronauts to perform spacewalks that are safer

0:36:51.200 --> 0:36:57.319
<v Speaker 1>and less complicated. Typically tethering the astronauts to the various spacecraft,

0:36:57.320 --> 0:36:59.680
<v Speaker 1>whether it was the space station or a shuttle or

0:36:59.680 --> 0:37:04.680
<v Speaker 1>whatever was the preferred method, because operating one of these

0:37:04.719 --> 0:37:08.640
<v Speaker 1>in space is hard, and it would be very easy

0:37:08.760 --> 0:37:12.480
<v Speaker 1>to give a command that could make the situation worse

0:37:12.600 --> 0:37:16.160
<v Speaker 1>rather than improve it. So despite films like Gravity where

0:37:16.160 --> 0:37:18.319
<v Speaker 1>you see folks using it all over the place and

0:37:18.400 --> 0:37:21.600
<v Speaker 1>shooting all over, it's very rare that any one would

0:37:21.640 --> 0:37:24.760
<v Speaker 1>actually use one of those in the In outer space,

0:37:24.800 --> 0:37:28.760
<v Speaker 1>they would more likely use robotic arms and tethers to

0:37:28.880 --> 0:37:32.840
<v Speaker 1>help astronauts get around in spacewalks, and not the actual

0:37:32.920 --> 0:37:35.840
<v Speaker 1>rocket packs. We got a little bit more to talk about,

0:37:36.080 --> 0:37:38.239
<v Speaker 1>but before I jump into the final section, let's take

0:37:38.280 --> 0:37:48.280
<v Speaker 1>another quick break to thank our sponsor. All right, let's

0:37:48.280 --> 0:37:51.120
<v Speaker 1>get back into terrestrial jet jet packs. Since we just

0:37:51.120 --> 0:37:53.399
<v Speaker 1>talked about the space one. So besides the ones I've

0:37:53.400 --> 0:37:56.080
<v Speaker 1>already mentioned, there are a few more that I can

0:37:56.160 --> 0:38:00.600
<v Speaker 1>chat about. There's a group called Jet Machines Extreme. They

0:38:00.640 --> 0:38:04.680
<v Speaker 1>created a project called the jet Vest and they claimed

0:38:04.719 --> 0:38:07.920
<v Speaker 1>it was the world's smallest jet turbine flying belt, so

0:38:08.000 --> 0:38:10.680
<v Speaker 1>it's really more of a jet pack. Their design would

0:38:10.719 --> 0:38:13.280
<v Speaker 1>allow for flights of up to three or four minutes,

0:38:13.680 --> 0:38:16.680
<v Speaker 1>so much longer than those hydrogen peroxide based units. In

0:38:16.680 --> 0:38:19.560
<v Speaker 1>two thousand twelve, they decided to hold a kickstart a

0:38:19.600 --> 0:38:23.000
<v Speaker 1>campaign to try and raise thirty dollars to fund the project,

0:38:23.600 --> 0:38:27.240
<v Speaker 1>but the campaign failed with less than two thousand dollars

0:38:27.360 --> 0:38:30.040
<v Speaker 1>raised by the end of it, which is that's an

0:38:30.040 --> 0:38:33.560
<v Speaker 1>ouch where you were twenty eight thousand dollars short of

0:38:33.600 --> 0:38:36.960
<v Speaker 1>your goal. Uh and I feel you guys, I know

0:38:37.000 --> 0:38:40.719
<v Speaker 1>what that feels like. So there are several companies that

0:38:40.800 --> 0:38:43.359
<v Speaker 1>make jet packs that were based off that old more

0:38:43.520 --> 0:38:49.359
<v Speaker 1>design from Bell Aeronautics, obviously updated ones that include a

0:38:49.360 --> 0:38:51.799
<v Speaker 1>company called t AM or TAM, There was another one

0:38:51.840 --> 0:38:54.960
<v Speaker 1>called Go Fast and one called Thunderbolt Arrow Systems. They

0:38:54.960 --> 0:38:58.520
<v Speaker 1>all kind of created variations off that same theme. Um

0:38:58.640 --> 0:39:02.160
<v Speaker 1>Eve's ROSSI that was a person who created one of

0:39:02.160 --> 0:39:06.680
<v Speaker 1>the winged jet packs, demonstrated his in two thousand six.

0:39:06.920 --> 0:39:09.759
<v Speaker 1>He leapt out of a hot air balloon went into

0:39:09.760 --> 0:39:12.920
<v Speaker 1>a free fall. He then ignited his engines and flew

0:39:12.960 --> 0:39:17.080
<v Speaker 1>around for more than six minutes before activating his parachute. Uh.

0:39:17.239 --> 0:39:19.400
<v Speaker 1>He said he didn't have any plans to market that

0:39:19.520 --> 0:39:21.880
<v Speaker 1>version of the jet pack. He has since done several

0:39:21.920 --> 0:39:26.080
<v Speaker 1>stunts using this design, including flying alongside other aircraft like

0:39:26.120 --> 0:39:29.680
<v Speaker 1>a Boeing uh jet. So it's kind of cool. They's

0:39:29.719 --> 0:39:34.000
<v Speaker 1>been managed to do that also, because his design largely

0:39:34.080 --> 0:39:37.840
<v Speaker 1>meant that you were already h igniting engines while you

0:39:37.880 --> 0:39:39.360
<v Speaker 1>were in the air, meant you no longer had to

0:39:39.400 --> 0:39:42.040
<v Speaker 1>take off from the ground. And that wing design also

0:39:42.080 --> 0:39:46.319
<v Speaker 1>means that flying forward he could generate lift. Uh, those

0:39:46.320 --> 0:39:48.720
<v Speaker 1>wings would help him generate lift unlike just the normal

0:39:48.800 --> 0:39:52.719
<v Speaker 1>human body, so that also helped him. He meant that

0:39:52.760 --> 0:39:56.040
<v Speaker 1>he could do crazier maneuvers and not just kind of

0:39:56.080 --> 0:39:59.680
<v Speaker 1>be in this upright standing position and slowly drift around

0:39:59.760 --> 0:40:02.400
<v Speaker 1>left or write or forward or backward or up or

0:40:02.400 --> 0:40:05.080
<v Speaker 1>down as the case. Maybe. Uh. There's a guy named

0:40:05.080 --> 0:40:09.320
<v Speaker 1>Frankie Zapata who recently showed off a hoverboard, which obviously

0:40:09.440 --> 0:40:12.040
<v Speaker 1>isn't quite the same thing as a jet pack, but

0:40:12.320 --> 0:40:15.520
<v Speaker 1>it is similar to that old flying pie pan design

0:40:15.560 --> 0:40:18.600
<v Speaker 1>I talked about previously in this episode, only it's way

0:40:18.640 --> 0:40:22.120
<v Speaker 1>more compact. It looks kind of like a quad copter

0:40:22.360 --> 0:40:25.680
<v Speaker 1>or drone, and according to Zapata, it can fly autonomously

0:40:26.200 --> 0:40:29.440
<v Speaker 1>up to ten thousand feet at a top speed of

0:40:29.480 --> 0:40:32.800
<v Speaker 1>a hundred fifty kilometers perer or ninety three miles pour,

0:40:33.320 --> 0:40:36.040
<v Speaker 1>and it can fly for ten minutes. It's powered by

0:40:36.160 --> 0:40:41.080
<v Speaker 1>kerosene jet fuel, so you know, yikes. It has four

0:40:41.920 --> 0:40:45.600
<v Speaker 1>fifty horsepower engines in it, and it contains a microcomputer

0:40:45.719 --> 0:40:49.120
<v Speaker 1>that calculates how much thrust each engine should generate in

0:40:49.239 --> 0:40:51.600
<v Speaker 1>order to stabilize the platform and allow you to make

0:40:51.760 --> 0:40:54.759
<v Speaker 1>turns and go in certain directions so that way, it's

0:40:54.760 --> 0:40:58.160
<v Speaker 1>not entirely up to the pilot's balance. So the previous

0:40:58.280 --> 0:41:01.480
<v Speaker 1>flying pie pan design meant that you had to shift

0:41:01.520 --> 0:41:05.560
<v Speaker 1>your weight in order to make the hovercraft essentially go

0:41:05.680 --> 0:41:09.000
<v Speaker 1>in whatever direction you wanted. With this high tech version,

0:41:09.280 --> 0:41:12.840
<v Speaker 1>you have a micro controller in that quad copter design

0:41:12.880 --> 0:41:14.440
<v Speaker 1>that does it for you. So what it does is

0:41:14.480 --> 0:41:18.239
<v Speaker 1>it tells each engine how how frequently to turn a

0:41:18.280 --> 0:41:21.920
<v Speaker 1>propeller essentially or a fan in order to generate the

0:41:22.000 --> 0:41:25.920
<v Speaker 1>right amount of thrust to keep the platform relatively stable,

0:41:26.000 --> 0:41:29.960
<v Speaker 1>or to introduce planned instability in order for you to

0:41:30.040 --> 0:41:32.760
<v Speaker 1>go in a specific direction. It's actually a really clever design,

0:41:32.760 --> 0:41:35.360
<v Speaker 1>and it's one that is based off of drones and

0:41:35.440 --> 0:41:38.359
<v Speaker 1>quad copters. That's how those are able to fly at

0:41:38.360 --> 0:41:43.719
<v Speaker 1>a level uh out attitude without you constantly having to

0:41:43.760 --> 0:41:46.799
<v Speaker 1>adjust things on a controller. They'll just kind of most

0:41:46.800 --> 0:41:49.440
<v Speaker 1>of these level out naturally on their own and by naturally,

0:41:49.440 --> 0:41:52.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's all controlled by a tiny computer that's

0:41:52.640 --> 0:41:55.960
<v Speaker 1>making very quick decisions as to how much thrust each

0:41:56.040 --> 0:42:02.200
<v Speaker 1>quad or each copter, each propeller should generate. Um, it's

0:42:02.200 --> 0:42:07.799
<v Speaker 1>pretty interesting. Uh. I think we should be glad that

0:42:08.360 --> 0:42:10.320
<v Speaker 1>this is the case, because otherwise, if you were to

0:42:10.360 --> 0:42:13.320
<v Speaker 1>over balance, if you're traveling at that speed, the crash

0:42:13.400 --> 0:42:19.040
<v Speaker 1>would be catastrophic at best, possibly fatal. On Zapata's website,

0:42:19.080 --> 0:42:21.600
<v Speaker 1>he says the flyboard, which is what he calls it,

0:42:21.640 --> 0:42:24.239
<v Speaker 1>is not for sale. If it were for sale, it

0:42:24.239 --> 0:42:28.479
<v Speaker 1>would cost you about two thou dollars. He does offer

0:42:28.560 --> 0:42:31.160
<v Speaker 1>other products, so it's not like this is the one

0:42:31.239 --> 0:42:33.680
<v Speaker 1>thing he's ever done. He's created a bunch of water

0:42:33.840 --> 0:42:36.879
<v Speaker 1>based hoverboards. I'll talk a little bit more about those

0:42:36.880 --> 0:42:42.080
<v Speaker 1>in a second, but these are essentially uh jet engines

0:42:42.120 --> 0:42:44.560
<v Speaker 1>that shoot out water, not air. So you have a

0:42:44.600 --> 0:42:47.720
<v Speaker 1>tether that goes down into the water, a hose essentially

0:42:47.800 --> 0:42:49.520
<v Speaker 1>that goes down into a body of water like a

0:42:49.640 --> 0:42:54.160
<v Speaker 1>lake or river or something like that pulls water up,

0:42:54.600 --> 0:42:58.080
<v Speaker 1>and then the engines shoot the water out at high velocity,

0:42:58.200 --> 0:43:02.799
<v Speaker 1>thus creating the thrust you need to altitude. Ramsey is

0:43:02.840 --> 0:43:05.160
<v Speaker 1>determined to get me into one of these things on

0:43:05.280 --> 0:43:07.399
<v Speaker 1>Lake Lanier and have me fly around. And I am,

0:43:07.680 --> 0:43:09.879
<v Speaker 1>for the record, fully in favor of it. I don't

0:43:09.920 --> 0:43:12.759
<v Speaker 1>want you to think that I'm saying Ramsey had this

0:43:12.840 --> 0:43:16.000
<v Speaker 1>idea and I'm terrified of Ramsey. I am terrified of Ramsey,

0:43:16.160 --> 0:43:19.720
<v Speaker 1>but for totally different reasons. I do want to strap

0:43:19.760 --> 0:43:23.279
<v Speaker 1>on one of these water jet packs. And um apparently

0:43:23.400 --> 0:43:28.240
<v Speaker 1>Lake Lanier, which is not too far from Atlanta, has them.

0:43:28.280 --> 0:43:30.800
<v Speaker 1>So keep an eye out for a potential tech stuff

0:43:30.880 --> 0:43:37.600
<v Speaker 1>video summer of possibly Jonathan Swan song. We'll see. It

0:43:37.640 --> 0:43:43.080
<v Speaker 1>really depends upon a few factors like budget and insurance. Anyway,

0:43:43.160 --> 0:43:46.239
<v Speaker 1>moving on, there was a company called actually there is

0:43:46.280 --> 0:43:49.360
<v Speaker 1>a company called Gravity who was founded by Richard Browning,

0:43:49.960 --> 0:43:53.480
<v Speaker 1>and it broke records in late with a jet engine

0:43:53.520 --> 0:43:56.279
<v Speaker 1>body suit called, and this is a great name for

0:43:56.320 --> 0:44:00.680
<v Speaker 1>a flying body suit, the Dadalus. At least it's not

0:44:00.719 --> 0:44:03.240
<v Speaker 1>the Icarus. If it were the Icarus, I would definitely

0:44:03.239 --> 0:44:06.279
<v Speaker 1>be raising some eyebrows. But the Dadalists. The record he

0:44:06.360 --> 0:44:08.880
<v Speaker 1>set was a speed record. He topped out at fifty

0:44:08.920 --> 0:44:12.120
<v Speaker 1>one point fifty three kilometers per hour or about thirty

0:44:12.160 --> 0:44:15.560
<v Speaker 1>two miles per hour. Now, that's slower than a lot

0:44:15.600 --> 0:44:18.040
<v Speaker 1>of the other devices I've talked about on here. But

0:44:18.239 --> 0:44:21.600
<v Speaker 1>the specific record he broke was for the fastest speed

0:44:21.680 --> 0:44:25.520
<v Speaker 1>in a body controlled jet engine power suit, which is

0:44:25.560 --> 0:44:27.399
<v Speaker 1>such a cool sentence to say that, I'm pretty sure

0:44:27.400 --> 0:44:31.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm iron Man now. Browning estimates that customizing a suit

0:44:31.600 --> 0:44:35.239
<v Speaker 1>costs about two fifty thousand dollars, so very similar to

0:44:35.239 --> 0:44:39.160
<v Speaker 1>the Zapota flyboard. His suit includes thrusters that are mounted

0:44:39.200 --> 0:44:41.960
<v Speaker 1>to the arms, meaning you can fly around kind of

0:44:42.000 --> 0:44:44.520
<v Speaker 1>like Iron Man does when he's in his standing position

0:44:44.560 --> 0:44:47.200
<v Speaker 1>and he's using his repulsors to sort of hover in place.

0:44:47.560 --> 0:44:49.640
<v Speaker 1>That's kind of what it looks like when Browning is

0:44:49.760 --> 0:44:53.879
<v Speaker 1>using his jet suit. There are also thrusters that are

0:44:53.960 --> 0:44:57.320
<v Speaker 1>on the base of the backpack itself that are providing

0:44:57.400 --> 0:45:00.720
<v Speaker 1>enough downward thrust to keep you elevated above the ground.

0:45:00.760 --> 0:45:02.960
<v Speaker 1>And you can use the thrusters on the arms to

0:45:03.040 --> 0:45:06.239
<v Speaker 1>sort of guide yourself around and and uh and sort

0:45:06.239 --> 0:45:10.080
<v Speaker 1>of direct your your motion. Um, but it looks a

0:45:10.120 --> 0:45:13.719
<v Speaker 1>lot like the pose that Iron Man has when he's

0:45:14.360 --> 0:45:17.200
<v Speaker 1>hovering in the air. It's kind of cool. And there

0:45:17.200 --> 0:45:20.360
<v Speaker 1>are videos online so you can look at Richard Browning

0:45:20.520 --> 0:45:23.920
<v Speaker 1>and the Dadalists jet Engine body suit and see this

0:45:24.000 --> 0:45:27.280
<v Speaker 1>in action. He also did a TED talk in seventeen

0:45:27.560 --> 0:45:31.440
<v Speaker 1>talking about his journey about deciding to build such a

0:45:31.520 --> 0:45:33.879
<v Speaker 1>thing and what it took to do it and kind

0:45:33.880 --> 0:45:36.319
<v Speaker 1>of the challenges he had to overcome, as well as

0:45:36.360 --> 0:45:40.359
<v Speaker 1>footage of him testing the thing. It's pretty cool. There's

0:45:40.360 --> 0:45:43.480
<v Speaker 1>another company called jet Pack Aviation that has built several

0:45:43.680 --> 0:45:47.680
<v Speaker 1>jet pack models, including one that an actual civilian got

0:45:47.719 --> 0:45:51.080
<v Speaker 1>to fly. Someone who wasn't working for jet Pack Aviation

0:45:51.480 --> 0:45:54.560
<v Speaker 1>was chosen to be a test pilot for one. Uh

0:45:54.680 --> 0:45:58.239
<v Speaker 1>it was a YouTuber named Misha Pollock who flew a

0:45:58.360 --> 0:46:02.120
<v Speaker 1>JB ten jet pack and with no training, he was

0:46:02.160 --> 0:46:05.280
<v Speaker 1>able to hover around. He was tethered to a safety line,

0:46:05.320 --> 0:46:09.880
<v Speaker 1>but he was flying actually in an avocado orchard. So lovely.

0:46:10.480 --> 0:46:13.640
<v Speaker 1>If Jetback Aviation would like a podcaster to do the

0:46:13.680 --> 0:46:17.480
<v Speaker 1>same sort of thing, I happily volunteer. The JB ten

0:46:17.680 --> 0:46:21.239
<v Speaker 1>was announced as a consumer product in two sixteen. They

0:46:21.239 --> 0:46:24.560
<v Speaker 1>said that it would start to be available in uh

0:46:24.719 --> 0:46:28.080
<v Speaker 1>the spring or summer of seventeen. And if you have

0:46:28.120 --> 0:46:30.960
<v Speaker 1>to ask how much it costs, apparently you can't afford it,

0:46:31.320 --> 0:46:33.759
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know how much it costs, but that

0:46:33.800 --> 0:46:37.800
<v Speaker 1>means I can't afford it. At CS eighteen, they showed

0:46:37.840 --> 0:46:41.239
<v Speaker 1>up at the Consumer Electronics Show, so Jetpack Aviation was

0:46:41.280 --> 0:46:44.200
<v Speaker 1>there and they showed off a prototype of the JB eleven,

0:46:45.000 --> 0:46:48.120
<v Speaker 1>the next model in their series. That one is supposed

0:46:48.160 --> 0:46:51.000
<v Speaker 1>to be able to fly up to altitudes of fifteen

0:46:51.120 --> 0:46:54.120
<v Speaker 1>thousand feet for up to twelve minutes with a top

0:46:54.160 --> 0:46:57.520
<v Speaker 1>speed of two hundred miles per hour, which is mind boggling.

0:46:57.960 --> 0:47:00.000
<v Speaker 1>According to the company, you can manage to find your

0:47:00.040 --> 0:47:02.880
<v Speaker 1>self as far away as twenty miles from your starting

0:47:02.920 --> 0:47:05.560
<v Speaker 1>point if you were determined to do so. The weight

0:47:05.640 --> 0:47:10.360
<v Speaker 1>limit for those jet packs is two sixty pounds. It

0:47:10.840 --> 0:47:14.960
<v Speaker 1>is able to fly through courtesy of six turbo jet engines,

0:47:15.800 --> 0:47:19.200
<v Speaker 1>and the pack can carry of fuel as part of

0:47:19.200 --> 0:47:22.759
<v Speaker 1>the setup. Uh. Then there's the Martin jet pack that's

0:47:22.800 --> 0:47:26.200
<v Speaker 1>marketed as the world's first practical jet pack. It's another

0:47:26.320 --> 0:47:30.040
<v Speaker 1>ducted fan approach similar to the platform I mentioned earlier,

0:47:30.160 --> 0:47:32.600
<v Speaker 1>but this one's in backpack form and has a range

0:47:32.600 --> 0:47:35.839
<v Speaker 1>of thirty kilometers or thirty minutes of flight time, and

0:47:35.960 --> 0:47:39.279
<v Speaker 1>it runs on gasoline, so the fuel is actually quite

0:47:39.280 --> 0:47:42.680
<v Speaker 1>easy to get hold of in that case, there's the

0:47:42.760 --> 0:47:44.960
<v Speaker 1>jet level flyer. This is where we start to move

0:47:45.000 --> 0:47:48.040
<v Speaker 1>into the water based jet packs. So you could call

0:47:48.040 --> 0:47:51.640
<v Speaker 1>it a uh jet in the sense that a jet

0:47:51.680 --> 0:47:54.880
<v Speaker 1>ski is called a jet. So they're using water or

0:47:54.880 --> 0:47:57.319
<v Speaker 1>not air. But you put on your bathing suit, you

0:47:57.320 --> 0:47:59.160
<v Speaker 1>put on your sun screen, you put on your pool shoes.

0:47:59.160 --> 0:48:01.319
<v Speaker 1>You strap on this backpack with a big old y

0:48:01.480 --> 0:48:04.719
<v Speaker 1>shaped pipe that's right behind your head and it kind

0:48:04.719 --> 0:48:07.279
<v Speaker 1>of follows the contours of your shoulders, the ends of

0:48:07.280 --> 0:48:09.399
<v Speaker 1>the y shape turned down towards your feet, with two

0:48:09.400 --> 0:48:13.200
<v Speaker 1>nozzles that spray water at an incredible rate, and it

0:48:13.200 --> 0:48:15.640
<v Speaker 1>looks basically like you've got to fire hoses strapped to

0:48:15.640 --> 0:48:18.960
<v Speaker 1>your back, spraying toward the ground. There's a promo video

0:48:19.000 --> 0:48:22.240
<v Speaker 1>that has a disclaimer that says doc takeoff and landing

0:48:22.239 --> 0:48:25.760
<v Speaker 1>our high risk maneuvers. Expert training required. So that fills

0:48:25.800 --> 0:48:28.600
<v Speaker 1>me with confidence. And from their marketing materials they say

0:48:28.640 --> 0:48:31.120
<v Speaker 1>you don't buy only a jet pack add on kit,

0:48:31.239 --> 0:48:35.160
<v Speaker 1>you will buy a new way of happiness, which involves

0:48:35.160 --> 0:48:39.080
<v Speaker 1>being propelled at high speeds above bodies of water. Apparently

0:48:40.080 --> 0:48:42.439
<v Speaker 1>there's some really cool stuff about this approach. The water

0:48:42.560 --> 0:48:44.600
<v Speaker 1>does not have to escape at the same velocity as

0:48:44.640 --> 0:48:47.319
<v Speaker 1>gas wood in a typical jet pack, because water is

0:48:47.360 --> 0:48:50.680
<v Speaker 1>a higher density and us can provide more thrust at

0:48:50.680 --> 0:48:54.160
<v Speaker 1>lower velocities than a gas would, so you're not shooting

0:48:54.200 --> 0:48:55.880
<v Speaker 1>water out at the same speed that you would have

0:48:55.880 --> 0:48:57.960
<v Speaker 1>to shoot out air in order to get that amount

0:48:57.960 --> 0:49:00.520
<v Speaker 1>of thrust. Also, the engine and the fuel system are

0:49:00.520 --> 0:49:03.640
<v Speaker 1>on a separate floating platform, so the jet pack doesn't

0:49:03.680 --> 0:49:06.200
<v Speaker 1>have to take that weight into account. You are tethered

0:49:06.480 --> 0:49:09.680
<v Speaker 1>both to a floating platform and to the water itself

0:49:09.719 --> 0:49:12.480
<v Speaker 1>in order to have that constant supply of water, and

0:49:12.560 --> 0:49:16.600
<v Speaker 1>that offloads some of the actual weight that you would

0:49:16.600 --> 0:49:20.080
<v Speaker 1>have to carry otherwise for a fully self contained system.

0:49:20.320 --> 0:49:22.000
<v Speaker 1>On the other hand, this does mean that you are

0:49:22.080 --> 0:49:26.680
<v Speaker 1>actually tethered to a surface um and it's really a

0:49:26.680 --> 0:49:28.799
<v Speaker 1>machine on the surface of the water that supplies the

0:49:28.800 --> 0:49:31.160
<v Speaker 1>water pressure for your fire hose jet pack. It's not

0:49:31.200 --> 0:49:34.640
<v Speaker 1>like your fire hose jet pack has a vacuum that's

0:49:34.680 --> 0:49:38.240
<v Speaker 1>sucking up water. You've actually got that on that mounted

0:49:38.239 --> 0:49:41.600
<v Speaker 1>platform as well, but you are still tethered down by

0:49:41.600 --> 0:49:44.919
<v Speaker 1>that water supply hose. And it looks like you could

0:49:45.040 --> 0:49:47.880
<v Speaker 1>attach the jet pack add on to jet skis if

0:49:47.880 --> 0:49:51.279
<v Speaker 1>you wanted to and be really super crazy. And there

0:49:51.280 --> 0:49:53.120
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of different variations of this. I've actually

0:49:53.120 --> 0:49:55.920
<v Speaker 1>seen them in action in various places that I've gone to.

0:49:56.040 --> 0:49:58.680
<v Speaker 1>I've just never been brave enough to strap one on.

0:49:58.760 --> 0:50:03.080
<v Speaker 1>But as I say, perhaps you will get a chance

0:50:03.120 --> 0:50:08.040
<v Speaker 1>to see your beloved podcaster Jonathan Strickland in a very

0:50:08.200 --> 0:50:14.760
<v Speaker 1>not flattering tight wetsuit kind of outfit being tossed around

0:50:14.760 --> 0:50:18.200
<v Speaker 1>in the air by giant torrents of water. And if

0:50:18.239 --> 0:50:20.799
<v Speaker 1>you have never wanted to see that, I bet you

0:50:20.840 --> 0:50:25.360
<v Speaker 1>do now, because I mean, come on laughing at others misfortune,

0:50:25.400 --> 0:50:28.440
<v Speaker 1>it's it's part of life. Well, that kind of wraps

0:50:28.560 --> 0:50:31.680
<v Speaker 1>up this discussion about jet packs. There are other examples

0:50:31.680 --> 0:50:34.359
<v Speaker 1>I could have talked about, both fictional and real, but

0:50:34.960 --> 0:50:38.480
<v Speaker 1>these I felt gave a good overview of the technology

0:50:38.520 --> 0:50:41.000
<v Speaker 1>and what is necessary in order for you to be

0:50:41.120 --> 0:50:43.600
<v Speaker 1>able to actually have a working jet pack. It also

0:50:43.680 --> 0:50:45.800
<v Speaker 1>is kind of a wake up call to say, hey,

0:50:46.440 --> 0:50:49.200
<v Speaker 1>if you want to fly around like Superman, uh, we

0:50:49.320 --> 0:50:51.239
<v Speaker 1>just don't really have the tech for that unless you're

0:50:51.280 --> 0:50:53.959
<v Speaker 1>going to put on one of those winged suits um

0:50:54.040 --> 0:50:57.120
<v Speaker 1>and and launch from the air already. And even in

0:50:57.120 --> 0:51:01.040
<v Speaker 1>that case, it requires incredible amounts of skill on athleticism

0:51:01.040 --> 0:51:03.600
<v Speaker 1>in order to do it properly. And that kind of

0:51:03.680 --> 0:51:06.600
<v Speaker 1>leads me into that final point about how I don't

0:51:06.640 --> 0:51:08.200
<v Speaker 1>think jet packs are ever going to be a real

0:51:08.239 --> 0:51:13.440
<v Speaker 1>consumer technology, largely because they're just so difficult to control

0:51:13.480 --> 0:51:16.200
<v Speaker 1>and they're so expensive. Those two barriers I think are

0:51:16.200 --> 0:51:20.239
<v Speaker 1>going to be constant. I don't see them getting any

0:51:20.320 --> 0:51:22.680
<v Speaker 1>different anytime in the near future. I don't think we're

0:51:22.680 --> 0:51:26.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna have a breakthrough in the cost of jet packs.

0:51:26.800 --> 0:51:30.120
<v Speaker 1>It's going to be a really expensive plaything for a

0:51:30.160 --> 0:51:32.439
<v Speaker 1>few people who can afford it and are crazy enough

0:51:32.480 --> 0:51:35.320
<v Speaker 1>to do it. And then on top of that comes

0:51:35.400 --> 0:51:39.160
<v Speaker 1>the necessity for expertise to be able to operate them safely.

0:51:39.200 --> 0:51:41.120
<v Speaker 1>Most of us don't have that. If you want to

0:51:41.120 --> 0:51:43.919
<v Speaker 1>see what I think a future filled with jet packs

0:51:43.960 --> 0:51:46.439
<v Speaker 1>would look like, you need to look up the jet

0:51:46.480 --> 0:51:49.399
<v Speaker 1>packs sketch from that Mitchell and Web look because I'm

0:51:49.440 --> 0:51:54.080
<v Speaker 1>pretty sure it's incredibly accurate to how a real future

0:51:54.080 --> 0:51:57.479
<v Speaker 1>filled with jet packs would go, which mostly means people

0:51:57.480 --> 0:52:01.160
<v Speaker 1>would be turned into projectiles and uncontrollably being hurled into

0:52:01.239 --> 0:52:05.880
<v Speaker 1>various surfaces and obstacles. And I don't think that's the

0:52:05.920 --> 0:52:08.640
<v Speaker 1>future we all want, at least not for most of us.

0:52:09.520 --> 0:52:12.319
<v Speaker 1>But it is a fascinating thing to think about. It's

0:52:12.360 --> 0:52:16.200
<v Speaker 1>this enduring idea and enduring enough for people to actually

0:52:16.239 --> 0:52:18.720
<v Speaker 1>have gone through and made some of the darn things.

0:52:19.200 --> 0:52:22.200
<v Speaker 1>And to me, that is really impressive. Maybe not practical,

0:52:22.600 --> 0:52:27.080
<v Speaker 1>but still a really impressive testament to human achievement. And

0:52:27.239 --> 0:52:29.800
<v Speaker 1>I think that's worth talking about now. If you guys

0:52:29.840 --> 0:52:32.120
<v Speaker 1>have any topics you would like me to cover in

0:52:32.160 --> 0:52:34.520
<v Speaker 1>future episodes of tech Stuff, or maybe there's a guest

0:52:34.560 --> 0:52:37.400
<v Speaker 1>you would like for me to interview on the show,

0:52:37.600 --> 0:52:40.080
<v Speaker 1>or a guest host you would like to have here

0:52:40.120 --> 0:52:42.600
<v Speaker 1>to talk about a specific topic, you should let me

0:52:42.640 --> 0:52:45.279
<v Speaker 1>know send me a message. The email address for this

0:52:45.280 --> 0:52:48.560
<v Speaker 1>show is tech Stuff at how stuff works dot com,

0:52:48.680 --> 0:52:51.280
<v Speaker 1>or you can drop me a line on Facebook or Twitter.

0:52:51.400 --> 0:52:53.600
<v Speaker 1>The handle at both of those is tech Stuff hs W.

0:52:54.040 --> 0:52:57.439
<v Speaker 1>You can go follow us on Instagram crystals sharing lots

0:52:57.440 --> 0:52:59.799
<v Speaker 1>of cool stuff over there, so check that out. And

0:53:00.160 --> 0:53:03.200
<v Speaker 1>remember you can tune in on Wednesdays and Fridays over

0:53:03.239 --> 0:53:05.960
<v Speaker 1>at twitch dot tv slash tech Stuff. You can actually

0:53:05.960 --> 0:53:08.560
<v Speaker 1>watch me record this show live. There are people doing

0:53:08.600 --> 0:53:12.200
<v Speaker 1>that right now. They're filling up the chat room with funny,

0:53:12.239 --> 0:53:14.520
<v Speaker 1>insightful things that I haven't been able to read yet

0:53:14.560 --> 0:53:16.680
<v Speaker 1>because I've been going over my notes, but I'll be

0:53:16.719 --> 0:53:19.560
<v Speaker 1>reading them shortly and interacting with them. If you ever

0:53:19.600 --> 0:53:21.719
<v Speaker 1>want to get into a conversation with me and say

0:53:21.840 --> 0:53:24.680
<v Speaker 1>nice things to me, preferably, please go to twitch dot

0:53:24.719 --> 0:53:27.560
<v Speaker 1>tv slash tech stuff. You'll see the schedule there and

0:53:27.760 --> 0:53:29.440
<v Speaker 1>maybe you can tune in the next time I do

0:53:29.440 --> 0:53:32.279
<v Speaker 1>one of these shows and be part of the conversation.

0:53:32.400 --> 0:53:34.279
<v Speaker 1>I would love to see you there, and I'll talk

0:53:34.280 --> 0:53:42.520
<v Speaker 1>to you guys again really soon. For more on this

0:53:42.680 --> 0:53:45.200
<v Speaker 1>and fathoms of other topics because it has to works

0:53:45.200 --> 0:53:55.400
<v Speaker 1>dot com