WEBVTT - Zandi: we're not measuring GDP correctly

0:00:02.480 --> 0:00:05.840
<v Speaker 1>Global business news twenty four hours a day. That's Bloomberg

0:00:05.920 --> 0:00:09.000
<v Speaker 1>dot Com, the radio plus mobile LAPP and on your radio,

0:00:09.280 --> 0:00:13.360
<v Speaker 1>this is a Bloomberg Business flash and I'm Cameron Moscow.

0:00:13.440 --> 0:00:17.640
<v Speaker 1>Global stocks are well, they're little change to lower now

0:00:17.680 --> 0:00:20.200
<v Speaker 1>as slump and Chinese exports were dragging metals lower and

0:00:20.200 --> 0:00:23.319
<v Speaker 1>brought equities to a five day winning streak. Brought that

0:00:23.400 --> 0:00:26.320
<v Speaker 1>winning streak to a halt. Right now. The decks in Germany,

0:00:26.320 --> 0:00:28.520
<v Speaker 1>though it is little change. The cat embarrass is down

0:00:28.560 --> 0:00:30.560
<v Speaker 1>a tenth of upper set, and the FT one hundred

0:00:30.640 --> 0:00:34.040
<v Speaker 1>is down two tenths per cent. SNP EVENI futures are

0:00:34.080 --> 0:00:36.680
<v Speaker 1>down six points DOWNI Mini futures down thirty seven, and

0:00:36.800 --> 0:00:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Nasdaki mini futures are down about fourteen and your treasury

0:00:40.120 --> 0:00:42.360
<v Speaker 1>U sixteen thirty seconds. The yield one point eight four

0:00:42.440 --> 0:00:44.839
<v Speaker 1>per set nine x screwed oil up nine tenths per

0:00:44.840 --> 0:00:47.240
<v Speaker 1>cent or thirty five cents to thirty twenty four. A

0:00:47.320 --> 0:00:50.640
<v Speaker 1>barrel comes gold is up seven tenths per center eight

0:00:50.640 --> 0:00:53.480
<v Speaker 1>dollar sixty cents to twelve seventy two seventy and ounce

0:00:53.800 --> 0:00:56.520
<v Speaker 1>the euros at a dollar ten nineteen again one thirteen

0:00:56.560 --> 0:00:59.560
<v Speaker 1>point oh nine sena Fee and Mark planning to end

0:00:59.600 --> 0:01:02.200
<v Speaker 1>a two day aca long joint venture to sell vaccines

0:01:02.200 --> 0:01:05.520
<v Speaker 1>in Europe as revenue from the product's dwindles. Small business

0:01:05.560 --> 0:01:08.920
<v Speaker 1>optimism declining in February, according to the National Federation of

0:01:08.959 --> 0:01:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Independent Business. The organization's monthly Small Business Optimism Index felt

0:01:13.080 --> 0:01:15.640
<v Speaker 1>the Naughty two point nine last month, compared to ninety

0:01:15.720 --> 0:01:18.920
<v Speaker 1>three point nine in January, and Dick Sporting Goods down

0:01:19.000 --> 0:01:22.160
<v Speaker 1>almost five percent in early trading after posting disappointing fourth

0:01:22.240 --> 0:01:25.160
<v Speaker 1>quarter results and providing a forecast for the current year

0:01:25.240 --> 0:01:28.600
<v Speaker 1>that trailed analysts estimates. That's a Bloomberg business flash, Tom

0:01:28.640 --> 0:01:33.600
<v Speaker 1>and Mike Karen, thanks so much. It is on Wall Street.

0:01:34.880 --> 0:01:38.400
<v Speaker 1>The following is from Bloomberg View. Opinions and commentary from

0:01:38.440 --> 0:01:42.400
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg columnists. I'm justin Fox, a columnist from Bloomberg View.

0:01:42.720 --> 0:01:44.840
<v Speaker 1>Wouldn't it be fun to work at a company where

0:01:44.880 --> 0:01:48.000
<v Speaker 1>nobody is the boss? For lots of people? Apparently not.

0:01:48.400 --> 0:01:52.680
<v Speaker 1>Online shoe retailer Zappos fell off of Fortune magazines hundred

0:01:52.680 --> 0:01:55.840
<v Speaker 1>Best Companies To Work For list last week after switching

0:01:55.880 --> 0:01:59.720
<v Speaker 1>over to a hierarchy free management system called Holocracy, and

0:02:00.000 --> 0:02:03.600
<v Speaker 1>digital publisher Medium announced Friday that has decided to ditch

0:02:03.600 --> 0:02:07.400
<v Speaker 1>holocracy because quote, the system had begun to exert a

0:02:07.480 --> 0:02:12.280
<v Speaker 1>small but persistent tax on our effectiveness unquote. In holocricy,

0:02:12.560 --> 0:02:15.919
<v Speaker 1>employees inhabit roles that give them full responsibility for some

0:02:16.000 --> 0:02:19.000
<v Speaker 1>slice of what an organization does. There's a process for

0:02:19.040 --> 0:02:22.160
<v Speaker 1>resolving conflicts and a framework for meetings to keep things

0:02:22.160 --> 0:02:25.080
<v Speaker 1>moving along, But there aren't supposed to be our managers

0:02:25.160 --> 0:02:28.840
<v Speaker 1>or hierarchies. It all sounds very democratic, except that it's

0:02:28.880 --> 0:02:32.600
<v Speaker 1>the bosses such as Zappos CEO Tony Say, who usually

0:02:32.639 --> 0:02:35.600
<v Speaker 1>pushed their companies to adopt delocracy, and it's the rank

0:02:35.680 --> 0:02:39.440
<v Speaker 1>and file who complain and resist. Why is that? Well,

0:02:39.480 --> 0:02:41.880
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's because being a boss is hard. There are

0:02:41.880 --> 0:02:45.160
<v Speaker 1>lots of tough decisions and often little credit. Really, who'd

0:02:45.160 --> 0:02:48.000
<v Speaker 1>want to do that? I'm Justin Fox, a columnist for

0:02:48.040 --> 0:02:51.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg View. For more Bloomberg opinion and commentary, please go

0:02:51.680 --> 0:02:54.200
<v Speaker 1>to Bloomberg View dot com or view go on the

0:02:54.200 --> 0:02:58.840
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg terminal. This has been Bloomberg View and Bloomberg View commentary.

0:02:58.880 --> 0:03:02.919
<v Speaker 1>It could be heard our weekdays. I'm Bloomberg Radio. March

0:03:03.000 --> 0:03:06.320
<v Speaker 1>sixteenth an important date. Michael brings us up to speed

0:03:06.320 --> 0:03:08.680
<v Speaker 1>on where we stand with our good guest. Federal But

0:03:08.760 --> 0:03:11.480
<v Speaker 1>Market Committee holds its next meeting in At one point,

0:03:11.520 --> 0:03:13.880
<v Speaker 1>people were fairly convinced it was going to be the

0:03:13.960 --> 0:03:17.680
<v Speaker 1>next date for a rate increase in the United States.

0:03:17.720 --> 0:03:20.799
<v Speaker 1>Now looks like that's off the table from what we're

0:03:20.800 --> 0:03:25.680
<v Speaker 1>hearing from Fed officials. But uh, Marks Andy from Moody's Analytics,

0:03:25.720 --> 0:03:27.280
<v Speaker 1>he's the chief economist there. Let me ask you this.

0:03:27.680 --> 0:03:34.080
<v Speaker 1>In December, the FED put out its survey of economic projections.

0:03:34.200 --> 0:03:36.840
<v Speaker 1>What they suggested was going to happen to the economy

0:03:36.880 --> 0:03:40.120
<v Speaker 1>by the fourth quarter of this year growth of about

0:03:40.160 --> 0:03:45.440
<v Speaker 1>two percent, unemployment rate of four point seven percent, and inflation,

0:03:45.920 --> 0:03:49.400
<v Speaker 1>uh core inflation of one point six percent. Well, we've

0:03:49.440 --> 0:03:54.000
<v Speaker 1>got inflation above that number. Unemployment is just above four

0:03:54.040 --> 0:03:56.640
<v Speaker 1>point seven percent at four point nine and we've got

0:03:56.640 --> 0:04:00.520
<v Speaker 1>growth of about two percent. So uh, first fall. Those

0:04:00.520 --> 0:04:03.800
<v Speaker 1>who said the FED was crazy and making those forecasts

0:04:04.200 --> 0:04:06.760
<v Speaker 1>don't seem to be correct. What about those who say

0:04:06.760 --> 0:04:10.800
<v Speaker 1>the Fed should not be raising rates. Well, I think

0:04:10.800 --> 0:04:13.720
<v Speaker 1>they'll pause in at this upcoming meeting just because of

0:04:13.760 --> 0:04:16.680
<v Speaker 1>the turmoil and financial markets since the beginning of the year,

0:04:16.720 --> 0:04:18.640
<v Speaker 1>and they'll want to see what the fallout on the

0:04:18.640 --> 0:04:20.880
<v Speaker 1>economy of that has been. I mean, it looks like

0:04:20.960 --> 0:04:24.479
<v Speaker 1>the fallout at least from the data is very modest.

0:04:24.560 --> 0:04:27.120
<v Speaker 1>Can't can't really see it. But it's still too early

0:04:27.160 --> 0:04:29.320
<v Speaker 1>to conclude that there won't be some impacts. I think

0:04:29.320 --> 0:04:32.720
<v Speaker 1>they'll wait, but you know, by the June meeting, and

0:04:32.839 --> 0:04:34.760
<v Speaker 1>I think they'll have all the evidence they need that

0:04:35.400 --> 0:04:38.800
<v Speaker 1>it's time to raise rates and continue to normalize policy.

0:04:38.880 --> 0:04:42.320
<v Speaker 1>The the economy is still creating, lots of jobs, unemployees

0:04:42.360 --> 0:04:47.000
<v Speaker 1>still declining, and inflation is uh, you know, actual inflation

0:04:47.200 --> 0:04:50.440
<v Speaker 1>has actually picked has picked up, and there's one point,

0:04:50.440 --> 0:04:52.320
<v Speaker 1>as you said, one point seven percent, which isn't too

0:04:52.320 --> 0:04:54.840
<v Speaker 1>far away from their targets. So I think we're in

0:04:54.839 --> 0:04:57.080
<v Speaker 1>for a series of rate hikes late this year going

0:04:57.120 --> 0:05:00.880
<v Speaker 1>into Well if that's the case, then doesn't the market

0:05:00.920 --> 0:05:03.840
<v Speaker 1>have a heart attack over that idea? Yeah, they have

0:05:03.920 --> 0:05:08.000
<v Speaker 1>some adjustments to do. Yeah, because the markets last I look,

0:05:08.080 --> 0:05:11.920
<v Speaker 1>they're pricing and maybe one great hike this year one

0:05:12.000 --> 0:05:15.880
<v Speaker 1>and a half. I would expect three and the series

0:05:15.920 --> 0:05:17.960
<v Speaker 1>next year. So yeah, I think the markets will have

0:05:18.000 --> 0:05:21.080
<v Speaker 1>to adjust and there will be more volatility and financial markets.

0:05:21.279 --> 0:05:24.000
<v Speaker 1>I think what we've seen so far this year is

0:05:24.320 --> 0:05:26.080
<v Speaker 1>is going to continue on and something we will have

0:05:26.120 --> 0:05:29.240
<v Speaker 1>to get used. Doesn't that then pulls a conundrum for

0:05:29.240 --> 0:05:31.520
<v Speaker 1>the Fed. They don't want to raise rates now because

0:05:31.520 --> 0:05:34.000
<v Speaker 1>of volatility, which means they have to raise rates more

0:05:34.160 --> 0:05:38.040
<v Speaker 1>later which will cause volatility. Doesn't that cause them must

0:05:38.080 --> 0:05:42.039
<v Speaker 1>be talking to Mark Sandy to have a question like that. No,

0:05:42.600 --> 0:05:45.400
<v Speaker 1>because I don't think as we will see that it's

0:05:45.400 --> 0:05:47.599
<v Speaker 1>going to have a major impact on the economy. You know,

0:05:47.640 --> 0:05:52.160
<v Speaker 1>markets go up down all around sideways, and you know,

0:05:52.880 --> 0:05:54.880
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the day, we're still creating two

0:05:54.920 --> 0:05:57.839
<v Speaker 1>hundreds thousand jobs per months. The economy is moving forward.

0:05:57.920 --> 0:06:01.560
<v Speaker 1>So uh, you know, the finance terminal is very uncomfortable,

0:06:01.640 --> 0:06:04.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, particularly for people on Wall Street who observing this,

0:06:05.040 --> 0:06:08.320
<v Speaker 1>and you know, wealthy individuals watching their their screen. But

0:06:08.480 --> 0:06:12.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, for most Americans, I think it's you know, sideshow. Mark,

0:06:12.279 --> 0:06:15.080
<v Speaker 1>we call the screen of Bloomberg terminal. You're supposed to

0:06:16.480 --> 0:06:19.560
<v Speaker 1>yeah I should, yeah, you know, and well versed with

0:06:19.560 --> 0:06:22.320
<v Speaker 1>that Bloomberg terminal as you know. But but guys like

0:06:22.400 --> 0:06:24.680
<v Speaker 1>you now were the unemployment rate, as you mentioned the

0:06:24.760 --> 0:06:27.120
<v Speaker 1>U six earlier, were at an extraordian important I did

0:06:27.120 --> 0:06:30.599
<v Speaker 1>a chart yesterday showing how rare sub four point zero

0:06:30.680 --> 0:06:34.800
<v Speaker 1>percent unemployment is. Jonathan tweets out to us this morning,

0:06:34.880 --> 0:06:38.160
<v Speaker 1>Dr Zany and he says, drs Andy is ignoring the

0:06:38.200 --> 0:06:42.080
<v Speaker 1>fact that most new jobs are minimum wage. And secondly,

0:06:43.120 --> 0:06:46.359
<v Speaker 1>excuse me, over ninety million people have quit looking for

0:06:46.400 --> 0:06:50.080
<v Speaker 1>a job. Give us an update on this real belief

0:06:50.200 --> 0:06:53.799
<v Speaker 1>in America that most of the new jobs aren't quote

0:06:53.880 --> 0:06:57.400
<v Speaker 1>unquote full time good jobs. Help us that. Yeah, that's

0:06:57.440 --> 0:07:00.240
<v Speaker 1>just you know, I'm perplexed by it. It's just wrong.

0:07:00.520 --> 0:07:03.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, when you create jobs per month, and again

0:07:04.040 --> 0:07:07.200
<v Speaker 1>that's we've been doing that. Plus you create all kinds

0:07:07.240 --> 0:07:11.840
<v Speaker 1>of jobs, yes, low paying retail, leisure, hospitality, but construction

0:07:11.920 --> 0:07:14.200
<v Speaker 1>jobs were creating a lots of them. They're they're all

0:07:14.280 --> 0:07:17.600
<v Speaker 1>middle paying, you know, K three twelve, education jobs, lots

0:07:17.600 --> 0:07:19.800
<v Speaker 1>of those their middle paying, and a lot of high

0:07:19.800 --> 0:07:24.920
<v Speaker 1>paying jobs and professional services, services, healthcare. So it's all okay.

0:07:24.960 --> 0:07:31.880
<v Speaker 1>Is the distinction the perceived or expected mobility among those

0:07:31.920 --> 0:07:35.000
<v Speaker 1>groups that a lot of America things they can advance

0:07:35.080 --> 0:07:38.560
<v Speaker 1>or their kids can advance to that better place. Yeah,

0:07:38.600 --> 0:07:40.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm on board with that. I think that's exactly right.

0:07:40.680 --> 0:07:43.240
<v Speaker 1>And it goes to the inks that we're being expressed politically,

0:07:43.280 --> 0:07:45.760
<v Speaker 1>going back to our father Coughlin discussion, I think that's

0:07:45.760 --> 0:07:49.480
<v Speaker 1>exactly right, but I would make I would suggest that

0:07:49.760 --> 0:07:52.960
<v Speaker 1>as the economy titans and in a year from now,

0:07:53.000 --> 0:07:54.840
<v Speaker 1>our problem isn't gonna be unemployment. It's going to be

0:07:54.880 --> 0:07:57.680
<v Speaker 1>a lack of labor. And at that point we're gonna

0:07:57.720 --> 0:08:00.840
<v Speaker 1>see wage growth pick up for folks at all parts

0:08:00.840 --> 0:08:03.000
<v Speaker 1>of the income distribution. It's a long time in coming,

0:08:03.480 --> 0:08:04.880
<v Speaker 1>and we should be doing a lot of things to

0:08:04.880 --> 0:08:08.480
<v Speaker 1>address this issue from a policy perspective, but the economy

0:08:08.560 --> 0:08:10.680
<v Speaker 1>is going to be right in in a good enough

0:08:10.680 --> 0:08:13.680
<v Speaker 1>place that everyone more people are going to benefit, even

0:08:13.720 --> 0:08:15.560
<v Speaker 1>though it's at the bottom part of the income distribution.

0:08:15.960 --> 0:08:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Well as the argument that Stanley Fisher was making yesterday

0:08:18.600 --> 0:08:23.000
<v Speaker 1>that the Phillips curve isn't broken, it's just slow. It's

0:08:23.000 --> 0:08:25.120
<v Speaker 1>alive and well, it's very obvious. It's very clear. You

0:08:25.120 --> 0:08:27.800
<v Speaker 1>can look at you know, wage growth across the industry

0:08:27.800 --> 0:08:30.080
<v Speaker 1>relative to the strength of those industries. You can see.

0:08:30.160 --> 0:08:32.160
<v Speaker 1>You can look at it regionally, look at which parts

0:08:32.160 --> 0:08:34.120
<v Speaker 1>of the country are doing well and not. You can

0:08:34.120 --> 0:08:36.319
<v Speaker 1>see in wage what you can see the internationally. The

0:08:36.400 --> 0:08:39.200
<v Speaker 1>Phillips curve works and has always worked in it is

0:08:39.240 --> 0:08:41.280
<v Speaker 1>working now and we'll we'll see it, you know, it's

0:08:41.280 --> 0:08:47.720
<v Speaker 1>already happening well in in that case by the end

0:08:47.760 --> 0:08:51.120
<v Speaker 1>of the year, and this will will come full circle

0:08:51.160 --> 0:08:53.760
<v Speaker 1>on Father Coughlin when it comes time for people to vote.

0:08:53.800 --> 0:08:55.600
<v Speaker 1>What are they going to be thinking about the economy

0:08:55.679 --> 0:08:59.320
<v Speaker 1>the second Tuesday in November. Well, you know, I do

0:08:59.400 --> 0:09:04.880
<v Speaker 1>think that people will uh. I think in general that

0:09:05.040 --> 0:09:09.120
<v Speaker 1>the establishment, the political middle will hold. I'd be surprised.

0:09:09.200 --> 0:09:11.760
<v Speaker 1>That's what happened in the thirties and the depression when

0:09:11.760 --> 0:09:13.800
<v Speaker 1>we have Father Coffin. I think that's what's gonna happen.

0:09:14.240 --> 0:09:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Just go around. But you know, I'm sure it's going

0:09:17.200 --> 0:09:20.240
<v Speaker 1>to be a close election no matter who's running. But

0:09:20.720 --> 0:09:23.360
<v Speaker 1>a year or two from now, I think the economy

0:09:23.440 --> 0:09:26.920
<v Speaker 1>and the political environment and backdrop will will be very different.

0:09:27.160 --> 0:09:29.320
<v Speaker 1>Dr Sandy thank you so much. Mark Sandy Wood. He's

0:09:29.320 --> 0:09:32.120
<v Speaker 1>analytic and he has been a resilient optimists on the

0:09:32.120 --> 0:09:37.400
<v Speaker 1>American economic experience. Mike, I think it's fascinating. You know,

0:09:37.440 --> 0:09:40.520
<v Speaker 1>you talk about Chris with with Nancy Reagan dying, you

0:09:40.600 --> 0:09:44.079
<v Speaker 1>talk about the the arch ring and concept of mourning

0:09:44.160 --> 0:09:48.040
<v Speaker 1>in America. When we have people talking about a new

0:09:48.080 --> 0:09:53.680
<v Speaker 1>morning in America, the mail just lights up. Yeah, you know,

0:09:53.679 --> 0:09:55.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't have an opinion, folks, I do, but I

0:09:55.800 --> 0:09:58.600
<v Speaker 1>don't let it out. The mail just lights up. That's

0:09:58.600 --> 0:10:02.120
<v Speaker 1>a fact. That's a fact. Well, um, there are a

0:10:02.160 --> 0:10:05.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of people who don't feel that we're there yet. Yeah. Also,

0:10:05.760 --> 0:10:10.120
<v Speaker 1>which explains the politics. There's politics is pretty ugly. But

0:10:10.120 --> 0:10:14.040
<v Speaker 1>I think Mark maybe right, and there's an awful lot

0:10:14.080 --> 0:10:19.679
<v Speaker 1>of weight to the political system and to upend it totally.

0:10:19.679 --> 0:10:26.599
<v Speaker 1>I mean we saw remember um uh back in and

0:10:26.679 --> 0:10:30.199
<v Speaker 1>Russ Parole was leading in the polls at one point

0:10:30.240 --> 0:10:32.720
<v Speaker 1>and he was a non factor by the end. So

0:10:32.800 --> 0:10:34.840
<v Speaker 1>let's see what happens. We got to get down the road.

0:10:34.880 --> 0:10:38.560
<v Speaker 1>We think uh Brett bare and uh Chuck God for

0:10:38.600 --> 0:10:41.640
<v Speaker 1>their perspective as well. Of course, a lot of this

0:10:42.559 --> 0:10:46.760
<v Speaker 1>what we do economics, finance, investment, international relations, filtering in

0:10:47.120 --> 0:10:52.160
<v Speaker 1>to your weekend reading and your political consideration as we

0:10:52.240 --> 0:10:55.760
<v Speaker 1>moved through the election cycle. I'm Bloomberg Radio. We do that.

0:10:55.960 --> 0:10:58.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm really proud of what we do. Starting eleven a m.

0:10:58.520 --> 0:11:01.959
<v Speaker 1>Sunday morning and going through Sunday afternoon, where You can

0:11:02.000 --> 0:11:05.640
<v Speaker 1>hear the political dialogue of this nation with good people

0:11:05.760 --> 0:11:10.080
<v Speaker 1>like Fox Do Sunday and meet the press from New York.

0:11:10.320 --> 0:11:11.920
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Radio.