1 00:00:03,040 --> 00:00:05,600 Speaker 1: It's a big take from Bloomberg News and iHeart Radio. 2 00:00:05,880 --> 00:00:10,120 Speaker 1: I'm west Coasova today helping countries get rid of debt 3 00:00:10,760 --> 00:00:26,840 Speaker 1: in exchange for cleaning up the water. A few weeks 4 00:00:26,840 --> 00:00:31,080 Speaker 1: ago on the podcast, we talked about green bonds. That's 5 00:00:31,160 --> 00:00:34,920 Speaker 1: this increasingly popular investment where you help a government or 6 00:00:35,000 --> 00:00:40,159 Speaker 1: company fund an environmentally friendly initiative like a solar project, 7 00:00:40,600 --> 00:00:42,720 Speaker 1: and you get your money back with interest. Like any 8 00:00:42,720 --> 00:00:45,720 Speaker 1: other kind of bond you might buy. Green bonds are 9 00:00:45,800 --> 00:00:49,920 Speaker 1: upwards of a trillion dollar market. Now today we're talking 10 00:00:49,960 --> 00:00:52,879 Speaker 1: about a different kind of eco friendly deal that's starting 11 00:00:52,920 --> 00:00:56,000 Speaker 1: to take off. It's called a blue bond, as in 12 00:00:56,040 --> 00:00:59,720 Speaker 1: blue like water. The U S environmental group, the Nature 13 00:00:59,720 --> 00:01:03,280 Speaker 1: can Servancy, has teamed up with banks to offer certain 14 00:01:03,280 --> 00:01:06,440 Speaker 1: countries a deal. They'll help them get out from under 15 00:01:06,520 --> 00:01:10,440 Speaker 1: crippling debt if they agree to tackle polluted coral reefs 16 00:01:10,480 --> 00:01:13,880 Speaker 1: and other dirty water systems. These kind of agreements are 17 00:01:13,880 --> 00:01:17,000 Speaker 1: also called debt for nature swaps, and they've been around 18 00:01:17,000 --> 00:01:21,240 Speaker 1: for decades. The Nature Conservancy's Blue bond model, which focuses 19 00:01:21,280 --> 00:01:24,280 Speaker 1: on water, is just one way to do it. So far, 20 00:01:24,440 --> 00:01:27,240 Speaker 1: a handful of countries have signed up, including the Sayshells 21 00:01:27,560 --> 00:01:33,120 Speaker 1: Barbados and belize they are really complicated deals and it's 22 00:01:33,240 --> 00:01:38,399 Speaker 1: not always clear who benefits the most. My colleague Sydney 23 00:01:38,480 --> 00:01:41,480 Speaker 1: Mackie in New York has been digging into them, and 24 00:01:41,520 --> 00:01:47,800 Speaker 1: she joins me now to tell us how it works. Sydney, 25 00:01:47,840 --> 00:01:51,440 Speaker 1: thanks for being here. Happy to be here. Blue bunds 26 00:01:51,520 --> 00:01:55,120 Speaker 1: can be a little bit intimidating to try to understand. 27 00:01:55,240 --> 00:01:59,840 Speaker 1: Can you give us a simple explanation of what they are? Yeah. So, 28 00:02:00,080 --> 00:02:02,960 Speaker 1: oftentimes when a government is trying to find ways to 29 00:02:04,200 --> 00:02:06,800 Speaker 1: raise money very quickly in order to prop up their 30 00:02:06,840 --> 00:02:11,440 Speaker 1: economy run projects that are important to the nation, they 31 00:02:11,480 --> 00:02:13,919 Speaker 1: will turn to Wall Street in order to do that, 32 00:02:14,280 --> 00:02:18,240 Speaker 1: and they'll essentially sell bonds and raise debt in order 33 00:02:18,280 --> 00:02:21,320 Speaker 1: to very quickly get US dollars. But that tends to 34 00:02:21,320 --> 00:02:24,800 Speaker 1: be pretty expensive, and so after a while, if a 35 00:02:24,919 --> 00:02:27,680 Speaker 1: very large sum of debt has piled up, just like 36 00:02:27,720 --> 00:02:30,120 Speaker 1: you or me and our credit card bills, it can 37 00:02:30,160 --> 00:02:33,800 Speaker 1: get unwieldy, and so a government will sometimes try to 38 00:02:33,840 --> 00:02:37,359 Speaker 1: find some kind of alternative solution to pay back its 39 00:02:37,400 --> 00:02:40,040 Speaker 1: debt if it's too much um and that's where blue 40 00:02:40,040 --> 00:02:43,440 Speaker 1: bonds come in. So for certain countries, especially those that 41 00:02:43,480 --> 00:02:47,360 Speaker 1: have really high debt loads but also are located along 42 00:02:47,360 --> 00:02:51,079 Speaker 1: the coast or have very ocean dependent economies that run 43 00:02:51,080 --> 00:02:54,720 Speaker 1: on tourism or fishing. That's where we're seeing opportunities for 44 00:02:54,760 --> 00:02:58,520 Speaker 1: these new investment vehicles called blue bonds, and essentially for 45 00:02:58,600 --> 00:03:02,120 Speaker 1: these governments, they're opportunity to take some of this very 46 00:03:02,160 --> 00:03:05,560 Speaker 1: expensive debt that they've borrowed from Wall Street and swap 47 00:03:05,600 --> 00:03:10,040 Speaker 1: it for what is theoretically a more affordable loan through 48 00:03:10,200 --> 00:03:13,639 Speaker 1: a US based charity called the Nature Conservancy, which is 49 00:03:13,680 --> 00:03:16,360 Speaker 1: working with a headful of other banks, including Credits SWEEZ 50 00:03:17,520 --> 00:03:20,600 Speaker 1: and the upshot of all of this is essentially that 51 00:03:20,720 --> 00:03:23,560 Speaker 1: the savings between the more expensive debt and this new 52 00:03:23,680 --> 00:03:27,840 Speaker 1: or less expensive quote unquote blue debt will be used 53 00:03:27,880 --> 00:03:33,560 Speaker 1: to fund certain nature saving measures, so ocean conservation, new 54 00:03:33,600 --> 00:03:38,320 Speaker 1: phishing laws, things that theoretically will help to offset pollution 55 00:03:38,400 --> 00:03:44,720 Speaker 1: and climate change in those ocean based economies. So essentially, 56 00:03:44,800 --> 00:03:47,880 Speaker 1: what they're sort of doing is refinancing their debt and 57 00:03:47,920 --> 00:03:51,240 Speaker 1: then keeping the amount that they saved to fund the 58 00:03:51,240 --> 00:03:56,520 Speaker 1: projects that they need to fund. Yes, exactly, so best 59 00:03:56,560 --> 00:04:00,040 Speaker 1: case scenario, a country is able to lower their a 60 00:04:00,200 --> 00:04:03,440 Speaker 1: load o les to Wall Street of this very expensive debt, 61 00:04:03,960 --> 00:04:06,160 Speaker 1: and at the same time that they're saving money, they're 62 00:04:06,200 --> 00:04:10,360 Speaker 1: able to funnel some of those funds into environmental measures, 63 00:04:10,360 --> 00:04:14,240 Speaker 1: which of course have become so important worldwide. But also 64 00:04:14,320 --> 00:04:18,520 Speaker 1: on Wall Street we've seen similar investment ideas pop up, 65 00:04:18,600 --> 00:04:22,120 Speaker 1: like green bonds. So this is just another part of 66 00:04:22,160 --> 00:04:27,000 Speaker 1: this environmental and social focused investing rainbow. So I can 67 00:04:27,040 --> 00:04:29,520 Speaker 1: see why one of these countries would find a blue 68 00:04:29,560 --> 00:04:33,360 Speaker 1: bond attractive. They lower their debt and they get found money. 69 00:04:33,400 --> 00:04:37,320 Speaker 1: What is the incentive for a bank and for this 70 00:04:37,839 --> 00:04:41,200 Speaker 1: environmental group, the Nature Conservancy to do this, what do 71 00:04:41,320 --> 00:04:44,599 Speaker 1: they get out of it? Well, for the Nuture Conservancy 72 00:04:44,680 --> 00:04:50,480 Speaker 1: in particular, their US based charity focused on environmental protection conservation, 73 00:04:51,120 --> 00:04:54,640 Speaker 1: and they've found this way to use money in in 74 00:04:54,640 --> 00:04:59,159 Speaker 1: innovative ways to do this, so they're effectively able to 75 00:04:59,520 --> 00:05:03,799 Speaker 1: further our mission, further their goals by working with governments 76 00:05:03,920 --> 00:05:07,559 Speaker 1: to have very specific pathways for how the money will work. 77 00:05:08,320 --> 00:05:10,480 Speaker 1: It's also sort of nice because they're able to set 78 00:05:10,480 --> 00:05:13,800 Speaker 1: it up where they're able to then step back and 79 00:05:13,880 --> 00:05:16,279 Speaker 1: let the money and the program do its work for 80 00:05:16,279 --> 00:05:19,159 Speaker 1: a long period of time. So I think for the banks, 81 00:05:19,240 --> 00:05:22,039 Speaker 1: of course, everyone likes to be a part of something 82 00:05:22,120 --> 00:05:25,280 Speaker 1: that is seen as on the right side of history, 83 00:05:25,320 --> 00:05:27,600 Speaker 1: pushing from these environmental measures. But of course I think 84 00:05:27,600 --> 00:05:30,760 Speaker 1: there's opportunity there if you're able to be involved in 85 00:05:30,839 --> 00:05:34,400 Speaker 1: some kind of innovative financing plan like the blue bonds initiative, 86 00:05:34,680 --> 00:05:37,200 Speaker 1: I'm sure they're making money off of it. There would 87 00:05:37,200 --> 00:05:41,880 Speaker 1: be little sense in becoming heavily involved in a program 88 00:05:41,920 --> 00:05:45,880 Speaker 1: that is purely charitable without being a charitable organization. And banks, 89 00:05:45,880 --> 00:05:48,360 Speaker 1: of course, are still trying to make money. So I'm 90 00:05:48,400 --> 00:05:51,039 Speaker 1: sure that although we don't have great insight into the 91 00:05:51,080 --> 00:05:54,240 Speaker 1: exact fee structures and the exact ways the banks are 92 00:05:54,279 --> 00:05:57,160 Speaker 1: profiting off of some of these deals, it's a safe 93 00:05:57,160 --> 00:06:00,200 Speaker 1: assumption to make that they are in fact making any 94 00:06:00,200 --> 00:06:07,440 Speaker 1: off of it. So when you think about the worldwide 95 00:06:07,839 --> 00:06:12,880 Speaker 1: bond market, which is trillions and trillions of dollars, how 96 00:06:13,000 --> 00:06:15,359 Speaker 1: much are blue bonds right now? How much of that? 97 00:06:15,560 --> 00:06:20,039 Speaker 1: Does that represent? A very tiny portion. These deals have 98 00:06:20,080 --> 00:06:22,560 Speaker 1: only been done a halful of times. Seychelles was the first, 99 00:06:22,600 --> 00:06:25,440 Speaker 1: As you mentioned, there was a larger one done in Beliefe, 100 00:06:25,520 --> 00:06:28,440 Speaker 1: which is a fascinating story of its own. That government 101 00:06:28,480 --> 00:06:32,000 Speaker 1: has had a bit of an infamous history in terms 102 00:06:32,000 --> 00:06:35,200 Speaker 1: of its relationship with Wall Street and its ability or 103 00:06:35,320 --> 00:06:38,400 Speaker 1: rather an ability to be able to pay its debt 104 00:06:38,520 --> 00:06:44,280 Speaker 1: back over time. How does a financial institution that creates 105 00:06:44,680 --> 00:06:48,120 Speaker 1: this investment make money off of it if they've made 106 00:06:48,160 --> 00:06:53,320 Speaker 1: it less profitable, So that's the question. The fee structures 107 00:06:53,520 --> 00:06:57,039 Speaker 1: in debt deals are not always the most transparent. In 108 00:06:57,080 --> 00:07:00,440 Speaker 1: a deal like this, especially a structure that's o new, 109 00:07:00,760 --> 00:07:05,160 Speaker 1: so novel, it's hard to really dig in and see 110 00:07:05,200 --> 00:07:09,200 Speaker 1: exactly how the cut of the proceeds is trickling out. 111 00:07:09,560 --> 00:07:11,280 Speaker 1: Now that we've seen a few of these deals, I 112 00:07:11,280 --> 00:07:14,000 Speaker 1: think there's going to be more focus on who is 113 00:07:14,040 --> 00:07:16,440 Speaker 1: making money here, But of course a bank is a 114 00:07:16,440 --> 00:07:19,880 Speaker 1: business and they have to make money. So as nice 115 00:07:19,960 --> 00:07:23,600 Speaker 1: and as good as some of these environmental pushes are, 116 00:07:24,240 --> 00:07:26,440 Speaker 1: they are also doing it for a profit. And that's 117 00:07:26,480 --> 00:07:29,680 Speaker 1: something to keep in mind. Is every person involved in 118 00:07:29,720 --> 00:07:32,680 Speaker 1: a deal like this has a motive, and they can 119 00:07:32,720 --> 00:07:35,880 Speaker 1: be two fold. They can be a motive toward having 120 00:07:35,920 --> 00:07:39,120 Speaker 1: a greener, more sustainable future, but also folks want to 121 00:07:39,120 --> 00:07:42,960 Speaker 1: get paid. So that's a good point. I mean, am 122 00:07:42,960 --> 00:07:47,120 Speaker 1: I cynical to think that maybe a small country that 123 00:07:47,240 --> 00:07:49,320 Speaker 1: has a lot of debt and is turning to big 124 00:07:49,360 --> 00:07:52,400 Speaker 1: financial institution might not be getting the best deal here. 125 00:07:52,800 --> 00:07:55,400 Speaker 1: I think it totally depends on the country and the situation. 126 00:07:55,920 --> 00:07:58,720 Speaker 1: You might have an example like Beliefs where they have 127 00:07:58,840 --> 00:08:02,400 Speaker 1: had trouble repaying their for years and years. Their debt 128 00:08:02,400 --> 00:08:05,120 Speaker 1: has already been restructured, so essentially they've had to go 129 00:08:05,200 --> 00:08:08,400 Speaker 1: back to their creditors on Walla Street and beyond and 130 00:08:08,440 --> 00:08:11,280 Speaker 1: say we can't pay. Let's come up with a deal 131 00:08:11,400 --> 00:08:14,840 Speaker 1: to you know, hopefully lower the amount we owe or 132 00:08:14,920 --> 00:08:18,080 Speaker 1: come up with a new payment schedule, and it hasn't worked. 133 00:08:18,280 --> 00:08:20,520 Speaker 1: So for a country like Beliefs trying to find an 134 00:08:20,520 --> 00:08:24,880 Speaker 1: alternative like this blue bond exchange program where they can 135 00:08:24,920 --> 00:08:28,120 Speaker 1: go down a new avenue and try something different, that 136 00:08:28,280 --> 00:08:30,920 Speaker 1: is an opportunity and it might not necessarily matter what 137 00:08:31,000 --> 00:08:33,520 Speaker 1: the fees are, what the structure is, if it's a 138 00:08:33,559 --> 00:08:36,320 Speaker 1: better option than what they've been trying to do. And 139 00:08:36,320 --> 00:08:40,559 Speaker 1: we're going to hear more about Beliezes experience with blue 140 00:08:40,559 --> 00:08:45,080 Speaker 1: bonds in just a little bit Sydney. Typically, a country 141 00:08:45,160 --> 00:08:47,880 Speaker 1: that finds itself into situation like this might go to 142 00:08:48,800 --> 00:08:52,720 Speaker 1: UH the International Monetary Fund, an organization that helps countries 143 00:08:53,240 --> 00:08:57,760 Speaker 1: in this sort of situation, Why don't they go there 144 00:08:57,800 --> 00:09:03,000 Speaker 1: instead of turning to the sure currentservancy and financial institutions 145 00:09:03,000 --> 00:09:05,839 Speaker 1: for these blue bonds. That's a really good question, and 146 00:09:06,040 --> 00:09:09,080 Speaker 1: I think again it depends on the government, who the 147 00:09:09,160 --> 00:09:12,240 Speaker 1: leadership is and what their goals are. Working with one 148 00:09:12,240 --> 00:09:15,920 Speaker 1: of these large multilateral lenders like the i m F 149 00:09:16,000 --> 00:09:18,480 Speaker 1: can be a good option, but it often comes with 150 00:09:18,520 --> 00:09:20,800 Speaker 1: different caveats that a government has to keep in mind. 151 00:09:21,200 --> 00:09:24,480 Speaker 1: The i m F might ask a government to go 152 00:09:24,679 --> 00:09:28,720 Speaker 1: through different economic or political reforms, things that the i 153 00:09:28,840 --> 00:09:31,720 Speaker 1: m F sees as really important for long term sustainability 154 00:09:31,760 --> 00:09:34,920 Speaker 1: for the country. But also they could come with measures 155 00:09:34,920 --> 00:09:38,280 Speaker 1: that are painful, austerity measures that are tough to stomach 156 00:09:38,400 --> 00:09:42,480 Speaker 1: for a country, especially one where people are already suffering 157 00:09:42,559 --> 00:09:46,240 Speaker 1: under the weight of high inflation, higher prices, or other 158 00:09:46,280 --> 00:09:52,280 Speaker 1: economic challenges. So under those terms, governments have to agree 159 00:09:52,320 --> 00:09:56,000 Speaker 1: to a lot of different conditions. Are their conditions put 160 00:09:56,000 --> 00:09:58,360 Speaker 1: on blue bonds? But I say the nature conservancy where 161 00:09:58,360 --> 00:10:01,680 Speaker 1: they have to meet certain targets. Yeah, So in that way, 162 00:10:01,720 --> 00:10:04,480 Speaker 1: it's it's a little bit similar, except instead of having 163 00:10:04,520 --> 00:10:09,079 Speaker 1: these targets be focused primarily on economic initiatives, the blue 164 00:10:09,120 --> 00:10:13,400 Speaker 1: bond program is focused on ocean and marine conservation. So 165 00:10:13,520 --> 00:10:15,320 Speaker 1: I think for most of the deals that we've seen 166 00:10:15,360 --> 00:10:19,280 Speaker 1: so far, the goal is for about thirty marine conservation 167 00:10:19,520 --> 00:10:22,880 Speaker 1: over a period of time. So that could include a 168 00:10:22,920 --> 00:10:27,880 Speaker 1: lot of different things, potentially passing legislation that formally designates 169 00:10:27,880 --> 00:10:32,520 Speaker 1: protected areas. It could be changing phishing laws or implementing 170 00:10:33,120 --> 00:10:36,680 Speaker 1: different programs to crack down on illegal fishing or other 171 00:10:36,760 --> 00:10:41,240 Speaker 1: illegal operations that can harm the environment. So it's a 172 00:10:41,240 --> 00:10:44,920 Speaker 1: different goal set, but with the blue bond scenario, it's 173 00:10:44,920 --> 00:10:47,199 Speaker 1: one that is very much focused on trying to make 174 00:10:47,240 --> 00:10:52,320 Speaker 1: the oceans a cleaner, safer and protected place. Sydney Maggie, 175 00:10:52,480 --> 00:10:55,000 Speaker 1: thanks so much for speaking with me today. It was 176 00:10:55,040 --> 00:10:58,640 Speaker 1: a pleasure. Thank you. After the break, we'll see what 177 00:10:58,760 --> 00:11:09,520 Speaker 1: a blue band deal looks like in real life. We've 178 00:11:09,520 --> 00:11:12,320 Speaker 1: been hearing about how these blue bands, these debt for 179 00:11:12,480 --> 00:11:16,440 Speaker 1: nature swaps, how these deals work. Now let's see what 180 00:11:16,480 --> 00:11:20,240 Speaker 1: they look like in real life. My colleague Natasha White 181 00:11:20,280 --> 00:11:24,080 Speaker 1: covers environmental investing and she's written a story about a 182 00:11:24,160 --> 00:11:28,319 Speaker 1: blue band deal and belies it's one of the first. Natasha, 183 00:11:28,440 --> 00:11:31,360 Speaker 1: thanks for coming on the show. Hi, thanks very much 184 00:11:31,360 --> 00:11:34,240 Speaker 1: for having me. Tell us first, just a little bit 185 00:11:34,280 --> 00:11:39,920 Speaker 1: about Belies and why they wanted to get into blue bands. 186 00:11:41,000 --> 00:11:42,800 Speaker 1: I guess if we if we go back to late 187 00:11:44,400 --> 00:11:46,959 Speaker 1: the country, which is highly dependent on tourism as a 188 00:11:47,000 --> 00:11:49,880 Speaker 1: main source of revenue, was was really struggling as the 189 00:11:50,240 --> 00:11:53,160 Speaker 1: COVID nineteen pandemic had had shut that off. People were 190 00:11:53,200 --> 00:11:55,280 Speaker 1: no longer able to visit the country, and that sort 191 00:11:55,360 --> 00:11:58,960 Speaker 1: of revenue had kind of dried up. And what it 192 00:11:59,000 --> 00:12:02,000 Speaker 1: meant was the country really struggling to pay back what 193 00:12:02,160 --> 00:12:04,640 Speaker 1: it had borrowed. So it had what's called a euro 194 00:12:04,679 --> 00:12:07,560 Speaker 1: bond in the market and it was looking unlikely that 195 00:12:07,600 --> 00:12:09,920 Speaker 1: the country was going to pay that back. So it 196 00:12:09,960 --> 00:12:12,120 Speaker 1: was it wasn't doing well in the market and it 197 00:12:12,160 --> 00:12:14,800 Speaker 1: was eating up its foreign currency. There was an option 198 00:12:14,800 --> 00:12:17,040 Speaker 1: on the table. It was an IMF deal. The i 199 00:12:17,200 --> 00:12:19,040 Speaker 1: m F is a typical kind of lender of last 200 00:12:19,080 --> 00:12:23,120 Speaker 1: resort for countries that are struggling with unsustainable debt burdens. 201 00:12:23,160 --> 00:12:26,240 Speaker 1: But I m F programs typically come with conditions, and 202 00:12:26,240 --> 00:12:30,480 Speaker 1: those types of conditions often make government's bulk. And so 203 00:12:30,600 --> 00:12:34,280 Speaker 1: Beliez was already struggling because they've lost so much income 204 00:12:34,440 --> 00:12:37,280 Speaker 1: from the loss of tourism, and so those conditions were 205 00:12:37,280 --> 00:12:39,520 Speaker 1: going to be a bitter pill the swallow if they 206 00:12:39,559 --> 00:12:42,640 Speaker 1: went along with them. Yeah, so Belize has been kind 207 00:12:42,640 --> 00:12:46,040 Speaker 1: of labeled a serial that defaultered. This wasn't the first 208 00:12:46,040 --> 00:12:48,360 Speaker 1: time that they were struggling with their debt, and the 209 00:12:48,360 --> 00:12:50,680 Speaker 1: option on the table for them was an IMF program, 210 00:12:50,760 --> 00:12:53,120 Speaker 1: but that came with these conditions and these kind of 211 00:12:53,160 --> 00:12:57,120 Speaker 1: austerity conditions which the government effectively found unpalatable. But they 212 00:12:57,160 --> 00:12:59,560 Speaker 1: also then had the second offer on the table, which 213 00:12:59,640 --> 00:13:02,640 Speaker 1: was the h Conservants here, you know, US based conservation 214 00:13:02,720 --> 00:13:05,360 Speaker 1: organization that has a long history and Belize, and that 215 00:13:05,480 --> 00:13:07,439 Speaker 1: had done a kind of what's called a debt for 216 00:13:07,520 --> 00:13:09,560 Speaker 1: nature swap in the stay Shells a few years earlier, 217 00:13:09,559 --> 00:13:12,240 Speaker 1: a much smaller deal, but nonetheless kind of piloted one 218 00:13:12,240 --> 00:13:14,520 Speaker 1: of these deals which have been around since the eighties, 219 00:13:14,600 --> 00:13:16,920 Speaker 1: but in a kind of new form. And so they 220 00:13:16,960 --> 00:13:19,520 Speaker 1: approached Beliefe and the Belize government were excited by the 221 00:13:19,559 --> 00:13:22,120 Speaker 1: prospect that, you know, they could pursue this avenue of 222 00:13:22,160 --> 00:13:24,840 Speaker 1: restructuring their debt without the kinds of conditions that would 223 00:13:24,840 --> 00:13:26,439 Speaker 1: have been imposed on them by the I m F. 224 00:13:27,080 --> 00:13:30,000 Speaker 1: And what did the Nature Conservancy approach and with what 225 00:13:30,080 --> 00:13:33,040 Speaker 1: were the details of the deal in the kind of 226 00:13:33,160 --> 00:13:36,880 Speaker 1: bigger picture sense. What the Nature Conservancy proposed what's called 227 00:13:36,880 --> 00:13:40,199 Speaker 1: a debt for nature swap, and that is a restructuring 228 00:13:40,240 --> 00:13:43,360 Speaker 1: of the debts and in return, some of the money 229 00:13:43,400 --> 00:13:46,319 Speaker 1: freed up from that restructuring would be allocated to nature 230 00:13:46,320 --> 00:13:50,200 Speaker 1: conservation projects. So in this instance, Belize had a five 231 00:13:50,640 --> 00:13:53,440 Speaker 1: fifty three million dollar bond in the market that, as 232 00:13:53,440 --> 00:13:56,480 Speaker 1: I said, wasn't doing well, and the Nature Conservancy came 233 00:13:56,520 --> 00:13:58,840 Speaker 1: in and said, you know, we can help you negotiate. 234 00:13:58,840 --> 00:14:02,559 Speaker 1: We will lend you money to back this bond, and 235 00:14:02,640 --> 00:14:04,760 Speaker 1: in return you need to allocate some of that money 236 00:14:04,760 --> 00:14:10,199 Speaker 1: towards specific marine conservation projects. Now, how exactly does this 237 00:14:10,280 --> 00:14:13,079 Speaker 1: work and the financial side, because the Nature Conservancy is 238 00:14:13,120 --> 00:14:16,080 Speaker 1: an environmental group, it's not a bank and a lending institution, 239 00:14:16,440 --> 00:14:19,920 Speaker 1: so who put up the money? Effectively, it's a kind 240 00:14:19,920 --> 00:14:24,400 Speaker 1: of tears crediting structure. So Belieze had to first buy 241 00:14:24,440 --> 00:14:28,680 Speaker 1: back this three million dollar euro bond from the market. 242 00:14:29,120 --> 00:14:31,680 Speaker 1: It negotiated you to a discount, but nonetheless had to 243 00:14:31,720 --> 00:14:34,840 Speaker 1: find the money to do that. So the Nature Conservancy 244 00:14:34,880 --> 00:14:38,720 Speaker 1: set up a subsidiary and that subsidiary lent believes the 245 00:14:38,760 --> 00:14:42,200 Speaker 1: money to buy back the eurobond. The Nature Conservancy is 246 00:14:42,200 --> 00:14:44,640 Speaker 1: a conservation NGA, it's not a bank. So they in 247 00:14:44,720 --> 00:14:47,360 Speaker 1: turn raised the money from credit suites or a special 248 00:14:47,360 --> 00:14:50,520 Speaker 1: purpose vehicle set up by credit suites and Credit Suite 249 00:14:50,560 --> 00:14:52,880 Speaker 1: and turn raised that money from the market, so from 250 00:14:52,920 --> 00:14:56,800 Speaker 1: institution investors, pension funds and credit suites did so in 251 00:14:56,840 --> 00:15:00,480 Speaker 1: the form of issuing bonds, and these have been called 252 00:15:00,520 --> 00:15:02,840 Speaker 1: blue bonds in the sense that they are connected to 253 00:15:02,920 --> 00:15:06,360 Speaker 1: Beliezes marine conservation projects that are an outcome of this deal. 254 00:15:07,000 --> 00:15:09,680 Speaker 1: So this tiered money for structure, where at the top 255 00:15:09,680 --> 00:15:12,880 Speaker 1: of the chain you've got institutional investors which have lent 256 00:15:12,920 --> 00:15:14,760 Speaker 1: money to Credit Sweeze, which has lent money to the 257 00:15:14,840 --> 00:15:17,480 Speaker 1: Nature Conservancy, which has lent money to Belieze, which it 258 00:15:17,520 --> 00:15:20,320 Speaker 1: has used to buy back this ailing europe one from 259 00:15:20,360 --> 00:15:23,680 Speaker 1: the markets. So I can imagine the heads of a 260 00:15:23,720 --> 00:15:25,560 Speaker 1: lot of our listeners are spinning with the details. I 261 00:15:25,560 --> 00:15:27,480 Speaker 1: gotta say my head is spinning a little bit too. 262 00:15:27,640 --> 00:15:31,320 Speaker 1: This is a really complicated structure. So is the Nature 263 00:15:31,360 --> 00:15:36,440 Speaker 1: Conservancy sort of the broker here between bellies and credit 264 00:15:36,480 --> 00:15:39,640 Speaker 1: suites the money behind this, and that it's the good 265 00:15:39,760 --> 00:15:43,400 Speaker 1: name of the Nature Conservancy that persuades people that this 266 00:15:43,440 --> 00:15:46,760 Speaker 1: is a good investment. To make debt for nature swaps 267 00:15:47,000 --> 00:15:50,240 Speaker 1: have been around since the nineteen eighties, but what I 268 00:15:50,280 --> 00:15:53,400 Speaker 1: think is new in this round of recent swaps, of 269 00:15:53,400 --> 00:15:56,680 Speaker 1: which believes is the biggest, which the Nature Conservancy has spearheaded, 270 00:15:57,560 --> 00:16:00,680 Speaker 1: is the involvement of, for example, in an investment bank, 271 00:16:00,840 --> 00:16:03,480 Speaker 1: credit swees, and that credit speece is able to raise 272 00:16:03,560 --> 00:16:06,560 Speaker 1: money to fund these deals from the market, so from 273 00:16:06,600 --> 00:16:09,400 Speaker 1: institutional investors, and that's a huge source of funds that 274 00:16:09,440 --> 00:16:13,000 Speaker 1: have previously been largely untapped, and someone's termed them kind 275 00:16:13,000 --> 00:16:15,720 Speaker 1: of turbo charged that for nature swaps in the sense 276 00:16:15,760 --> 00:16:19,520 Speaker 1: that there's now this unlimited, effectively unlimited pool of institutional 277 00:16:19,560 --> 00:16:22,520 Speaker 1: funds flowing, whereas in the past it was more kind 278 00:16:22,560 --> 00:16:27,000 Speaker 1: of deals done with bilateral enders, so governments that have 279 00:16:27,120 --> 00:16:33,320 Speaker 1: limited funds. So the band that the les head out 280 00:16:33,400 --> 00:16:37,000 Speaker 1: was not doing well, they bought it back Credit Sweees then, 281 00:16:37,040 --> 00:16:40,600 Speaker 1: in partnership with the Nature Conservancy, cut their dead and 282 00:16:41,560 --> 00:16:44,560 Speaker 1: reissued it for others to buy. Why is it that 283 00:16:44,600 --> 00:16:47,600 Speaker 1: people are willing to buy this version of it when 284 00:16:47,640 --> 00:16:51,320 Speaker 1: they weren't willing to buy the previous version. Critically important 285 00:16:51,360 --> 00:16:53,680 Speaker 1: to this deal was a kind of insurance policy from 286 00:16:53,720 --> 00:16:59,000 Speaker 1: the US International Development Finance corporation, which effectively de risked 287 00:16:59,080 --> 00:17:01,600 Speaker 1: the deal for invest stars and effectively put the U. 288 00:17:01,720 --> 00:17:04,240 Speaker 1: S Government on the hook if Belize failed to pay. 289 00:17:04,680 --> 00:17:06,639 Speaker 1: So people invest in it. They can feel good about 290 00:17:06,640 --> 00:17:09,919 Speaker 1: it because they see that this is going towards cleaning 291 00:17:09,960 --> 00:17:12,360 Speaker 1: up coral we reefs and other other things like that, 292 00:17:12,440 --> 00:17:15,040 Speaker 1: and they don't have any risk that Believes, which you 293 00:17:15,520 --> 00:17:19,720 Speaker 1: describe as a serial defaulter, will default again. Right. So yeah, 294 00:17:19,720 --> 00:17:22,399 Speaker 1: I suppoke to one of the pension funds invested in 295 00:17:22,440 --> 00:17:25,359 Speaker 1: the blue bonds and they were excited by them because 296 00:17:25,359 --> 00:17:28,439 Speaker 1: they know they were low risks, compared them to effectively U. S. 297 00:17:28,440 --> 00:17:31,720 Speaker 1: Treasuries in the sense they've got US government well something 298 00:17:31,800 --> 00:17:34,720 Speaker 1: similar to a US government guarantee. And at the same 299 00:17:34,760 --> 00:17:38,480 Speaker 1: time they are linked to marine conservation, so they have 300 00:17:38,520 --> 00:17:42,399 Speaker 1: a kind of E. S G label on them. Up next, 301 00:17:42,920 --> 00:17:52,480 Speaker 1: what are the future of blue bands? So they made 302 00:17:52,480 --> 00:17:54,520 Speaker 1: this deal? How's it going? How did it work out? 303 00:17:55,240 --> 00:17:57,960 Speaker 1: It cut believe is debt by twelve percent of g 304 00:17:58,080 --> 00:18:00,879 Speaker 1: d P. It reopened its access to financial markets, and 305 00:18:00,920 --> 00:18:04,560 Speaker 1: it redirected money that was once destined for foreign creditors 306 00:18:04,560 --> 00:18:07,360 Speaker 1: into the local economy. And at the same time Belize 307 00:18:07,400 --> 00:18:11,639 Speaker 1: promised too final millions to protect its oceans and nature. 308 00:18:12,280 --> 00:18:15,640 Speaker 1: I think regarding the long term impacts, only time will tell. 309 00:18:15,920 --> 00:18:19,640 Speaker 1: Believes that remains unsustainable. So while it helped cut Beliezes 310 00:18:19,680 --> 00:18:22,480 Speaker 1: debt burden, it hasn't put the country back on a 311 00:18:22,760 --> 00:18:26,880 Speaker 1: fully sustainable path. And while the new terms of the 312 00:18:26,920 --> 00:18:29,919 Speaker 1: deal offer a lower interest rate than the europe one 313 00:18:30,000 --> 00:18:31,920 Speaker 1: that was in the market, and on a lower amount, 314 00:18:32,080 --> 00:18:34,240 Speaker 1: that interest steps back up over the next few years. 315 00:18:34,359 --> 00:18:36,520 Speaker 1: They've got a bit of breathing room, but they'll know 316 00:18:36,560 --> 00:18:40,160 Speaker 1: that interest does step back up. And yeah, in December, 317 00:18:40,200 --> 00:18:42,240 Speaker 1: the first ones will dispersed to some of the marine 318 00:18:42,280 --> 00:18:44,840 Speaker 1: conservation projects, but again it remains to see how those 319 00:18:44,840 --> 00:18:47,680 Speaker 1: will be managed and implemented over time. That is an unknown. 320 00:18:48,280 --> 00:18:50,160 Speaker 1: It sounds like a pretty good deal they were able 321 00:18:50,200 --> 00:18:52,760 Speaker 1: to get from underneath a dead burden, as you describe it. 322 00:18:52,800 --> 00:18:55,760 Speaker 1: But was this the best deal that Beliefs could have gotten? 323 00:18:56,200 --> 00:18:59,240 Speaker 1: Was this a good deal for them? Right? So believes 324 00:18:59,280 --> 00:19:02,960 Speaker 1: our adamant that they have secured the best deal they could. 325 00:19:03,480 --> 00:19:06,200 Speaker 1: But I've spoken to a number of debt experts who 326 00:19:06,200 --> 00:19:07,960 Speaker 1: have looked at the conditions of the deal and have 327 00:19:08,040 --> 00:19:12,080 Speaker 1: concluded that it's extremely expensive for what it is? What 328 00:19:12,119 --> 00:19:14,159 Speaker 1: do you mean by that? One key element as I 329 00:19:14,240 --> 00:19:18,080 Speaker 1: as I described the credit structure. So credit spees lends 330 00:19:18,080 --> 00:19:20,439 Speaker 1: money to the Nature Conservancy, which lends money to Believe, 331 00:19:21,080 --> 00:19:24,040 Speaker 1: and those interest rates on those those loan structures are different. 332 00:19:24,119 --> 00:19:26,840 Speaker 1: So credit Spies is borrowing money and the Nature Conservancy 333 00:19:26,920 --> 00:19:29,439 Speaker 1: is borrowing money at a different rate to which Believes 334 00:19:29,560 --> 00:19:32,479 Speaker 1: is borrowing money a lower rate. They are borrowing at 335 00:19:32,480 --> 00:19:35,480 Speaker 1: a lower rate than they are offering Beliez. And so 336 00:19:35,800 --> 00:19:38,679 Speaker 1: we've taken a closer look at that what's called spread 337 00:19:38,720 --> 00:19:41,480 Speaker 1: the difference in the interest rates, and questioned it, why 338 00:19:41,520 --> 00:19:44,400 Speaker 1: aren't those lower borrowing costs being passed down to belieze? 339 00:19:44,800 --> 00:19:47,399 Speaker 1: And the response from credits recent from the Nature Conservancy 340 00:19:47,480 --> 00:19:49,680 Speaker 1: is that the lower borrowing costs have been passed down 341 00:19:49,760 --> 00:19:52,359 Speaker 1: and actually the reason for the difference in our interest 342 00:19:52,480 --> 00:19:55,080 Speaker 1: rate is actually a number that it covers a number 343 00:19:55,080 --> 00:19:58,760 Speaker 1: of costs. And so critics are saying, why are we 344 00:19:58,800 --> 00:20:01,119 Speaker 1: just finding out about the is costs now? Why weren't 345 00:20:01,119 --> 00:20:03,639 Speaker 1: those costs fully disclosed in the first place. This is 346 00:20:03,680 --> 00:20:06,280 Speaker 1: public money that we're talking about, both from beliefs but 347 00:20:06,320 --> 00:20:09,280 Speaker 1: also from the u s. Taxpayers are guaranteing the offering 348 00:20:09,280 --> 00:20:13,199 Speaker 1: the insurance policy and everything needs to be fully transparent. 349 00:20:13,240 --> 00:20:15,760 Speaker 1: And it's both important for beliefs, but it's also important 350 00:20:15,800 --> 00:20:18,240 Speaker 1: for other countries that are looking to negotiate these deals 351 00:20:18,240 --> 00:20:20,679 Speaker 1: in the future. They should know what it is that 352 00:20:20,760 --> 00:20:23,439 Speaker 1: they're upper gates when there negotiating with these organizations and 353 00:20:23,440 --> 00:20:29,280 Speaker 1: these investment banks to put these deals in place. And 354 00:20:29,320 --> 00:20:31,679 Speaker 1: do you think that these dead for nature swabs in 355 00:20:31,720 --> 00:20:35,840 Speaker 1: particular blue bands are going to become more popular, that 356 00:20:35,920 --> 00:20:39,440 Speaker 1: will start to see more of these deals in the future. Yeah, 357 00:20:39,480 --> 00:20:41,600 Speaker 1: so I think three will be a big year for 358 00:20:41,640 --> 00:20:44,120 Speaker 1: Death for Nature swaps. These deals are attracting a lot 359 00:20:44,119 --> 00:20:47,280 Speaker 1: of interest. Gabon signal plans for a seven hundred million 360 00:20:47,280 --> 00:20:50,440 Speaker 1: dollar restructuring in October, Ecuadora said to be working on 361 00:20:50,520 --> 00:20:53,520 Speaker 1: an eight hundred million dollar transaction, and Sri Lanka is 362 00:20:53,560 --> 00:20:56,440 Speaker 1: considering a one billion dollar deal. So we're seeing both 363 00:20:56,520 --> 00:20:59,320 Speaker 1: increasing levels of interests as well as an increasing size 364 00:20:59,359 --> 00:21:03,640 Speaker 1: of the transit action on the negotiation. Natasha White, thanks 365 00:21:03,680 --> 00:21:06,119 Speaker 1: so much for talking to me today. Thanks very much 366 00:21:06,119 --> 00:21:08,919 Speaker 1: for having me. You could read more about blue bonds 367 00:21:08,960 --> 00:21:13,800 Speaker 1: from Natasha White and Sydney Mackie at Bloomberg dot com. 368 00:21:13,800 --> 00:21:15,560 Speaker 1: Thanks for listening to us here at The Big Take, 369 00:21:15,920 --> 00:21:18,960 Speaker 1: the daily podcast from Bloomberg and I Heart Radio. For 370 00:21:19,040 --> 00:21:21,840 Speaker 1: more shows from my heart Radio, visit the heart Radio app, 371 00:21:22,080 --> 00:21:25,560 Speaker 1: Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen. Read Today story and 372 00:21:25,640 --> 00:21:28,840 Speaker 1: subscribe to our daily newsletter at Bloomberg dot com slash 373 00:21:28,880 --> 00:21:31,719 Speaker 1: Big Take, and we'd love to hear from you. Email 374 00:21:31,840 --> 00:21:34,600 Speaker 1: us with questions or comments to Big Take at Bloomberg 375 00:21:34,680 --> 00:21:38,879 Speaker 1: dot net. The supervising producer of The Big Take is 376 00:21:39,160 --> 00:21:44,120 Speaker 1: Vicky Burgalina. Our senior producer is Katherine Pink, Our producer 377 00:21:44,240 --> 00:21:51,720 Speaker 1: is and associate producer is Rafael lum Seeley is our engineer. 378 00:21:52,240 --> 00:21:56,480 Speaker 1: Original music by Leo Sidrin. I'm West Kasova. We'll be 379 00:21:56,520 --> 00:22:04,439 Speaker 1: back tomorrow with another Big Take, The Punk and Put 380 00:22:04,800 --> 00:22:08,680 Speaker 1: and Burn, the don Own the