1 00:00:02,520 --> 00:00:07,040 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News. 2 00:00:10,480 --> 00:00:13,800 Speaker 2: Welcome to the Bloomberg Daybreak Asia Podcast. I'm Dan Schwartzman. 3 00:00:14,000 --> 00:00:16,919 Speaker 2: Doug Chrisner is off this week. Coming up, we'll preview 4 00:00:16,960 --> 00:00:20,000 Speaker 2: earnings this week from Japanese auto giants Toyota and Honda. 5 00:00:20,120 --> 00:00:22,919 Speaker 2: We'll hear from Kota Yasawa, head of Asia Auto research 6 00:00:22,920 --> 00:00:25,680 Speaker 2: at Goldman Sachs. But we begin this morning with trade. 7 00:00:25,800 --> 00:00:28,639 Speaker 2: The August first tariff deadline imposed by President Donald Trump 8 00:00:28,720 --> 00:00:31,200 Speaker 2: has coming gone, with Levy's set to go into effect 9 00:00:31,320 --> 00:00:35,240 Speaker 2: later this week. US Trade Representative Jamison Greer says tariffrates 10 00:00:35,240 --> 00:00:38,200 Speaker 2: are quote pretty much set and unlikely to change, even 11 00:00:38,240 --> 00:00:41,000 Speaker 2: amid ongoing trade talks to the likes of Canada and China. 12 00:00:41,360 --> 00:00:43,680 Speaker 2: Greer spoke Sunday to CBS's Face the Nation. 13 00:00:44,280 --> 00:00:46,000 Speaker 3: I think a lot of these well I know a 14 00:00:46,000 --> 00:00:48,479 Speaker 3: lot of these are set rates pursue it to deals. 15 00:00:49,040 --> 00:00:51,720 Speaker 3: Some of these deals are announced, some are not. Others 16 00:00:51,760 --> 00:00:54,200 Speaker 3: depend on the level of the trade deficit or surplus 17 00:00:54,200 --> 00:00:58,160 Speaker 3: we may have with the country. So these teriffrates are 18 00:00:58,200 --> 00:00:59,040 Speaker 3: pretty much set. 19 00:00:59,200 --> 00:01:02,400 Speaker 2: That's US Trade presentative of Jamison Greer speaking to CBS. 20 00:01:02,760 --> 00:01:05,680 Speaker 2: He also described the US China trade negotiations as quote 21 00:01:05,760 --> 00:01:10,040 Speaker 2: very positive, citing progress on critical mineral supply chains. Meantime, 22 00:01:10,080 --> 00:01:12,560 Speaker 2: President Trump had this to say before boarding Air Force 23 00:01:12,600 --> 00:01:13,480 Speaker 2: one late Sunday. 24 00:01:13,800 --> 00:01:16,399 Speaker 4: Yeah, I'm not looking for leverage. I'm looking for fairness. 25 00:01:17,280 --> 00:01:21,640 Speaker 4: We want reciprocal as much as possible. Sometimes reciprocal would 26 00:01:21,640 --> 00:01:24,200 Speaker 4: be too much for them to handle because it's it 27 00:01:24,240 --> 00:01:27,560 Speaker 4: would be a much bigger number. But we want to 28 00:01:27,600 --> 00:01:31,800 Speaker 4: see some reciprocity. We want to see reciprocal wherever we can. 29 00:01:32,000 --> 00:01:34,479 Speaker 2: From more we hear from Sharon O'Halleran professor of political 30 00:01:34,560 --> 00:01:38,280 Speaker 2: economy and international and public affairs at Columbia University. She 31 00:01:38,360 --> 00:01:40,880 Speaker 2: spoke at Bloomberg's Heidi Stroud, Watts, and Paul Allen on 32 00:01:40,880 --> 00:01:42,040 Speaker 2: the Asia trade. 33 00:01:42,520 --> 00:01:45,440 Speaker 5: Sharon, really great to have you with us. Nothing's ever 34 00:01:45,440 --> 00:01:47,240 Speaker 5: really set in the stone when it comes to President 35 00:01:47,280 --> 00:01:50,160 Speaker 5: Trump and this White House policies, Right, do you think 36 00:01:50,160 --> 00:01:52,440 Speaker 5: there is still we room, particularly when it comes to 37 00:01:53,000 --> 00:01:55,160 Speaker 5: some of these nations that have been hard to hit 38 00:01:55,160 --> 00:01:58,240 Speaker 5: than others, for example the sort of extension that we 39 00:01:58,280 --> 00:02:00,000 Speaker 5: saw when it comes to tirephrights on Kindada. 40 00:02:01,320 --> 00:02:05,280 Speaker 1: Right. So yes, no, I don't think anything is ever 41 00:02:05,520 --> 00:02:11,679 Speaker 1: set in stone with President Trump. Is the ultimate negotiator, 42 00:02:11,760 --> 00:02:15,639 Speaker 1: and these are moves to negotiate. They're being done under 43 00:02:15,680 --> 00:02:20,239 Speaker 1: three oh one executive authority, which is done in case 44 00:02:20,400 --> 00:02:25,560 Speaker 1: is used in cases where they're seen unaffair or discriminatory 45 00:02:25,600 --> 00:02:28,200 Speaker 1: types of policies that are being posed on the US 46 00:02:28,200 --> 00:02:33,600 Speaker 1: that have damage to both the markets or a particular sector. 47 00:02:34,600 --> 00:02:37,440 Speaker 1: That being the case, what we've seen is when you 48 00:02:37,480 --> 00:02:40,920 Speaker 1: look at the patterns of those countries that are being 49 00:02:40,960 --> 00:02:44,320 Speaker 1: subject to three oh one decisions and these types of 50 00:02:44,360 --> 00:02:49,600 Speaker 1: executive orders, that there are the countries where they receive 51 00:02:49,639 --> 00:02:55,200 Speaker 1: the largest surpluses intrate, that is, where the US has 52 00:02:55,240 --> 00:02:58,040 Speaker 1: a deficit with them, or in the case of Canada, 53 00:02:58,080 --> 00:03:01,400 Speaker 1: it has a large surplus with that particular with the 54 00:03:01,520 --> 00:03:05,600 Speaker 1: United States. We've seen this across a number of different countries, 55 00:03:05,639 --> 00:03:08,400 Speaker 1: and it's not just the size of the country or 56 00:03:08,480 --> 00:03:11,800 Speaker 1: the complexity of the trade relations. It seems to be 57 00:03:12,160 --> 00:03:17,280 Speaker 1: just if there is a surplus, for example, Cambodia and 58 00:03:19,360 --> 00:03:23,040 Speaker 1: other types of smaller countries which do have a trade surplus, 59 00:03:23,080 --> 00:03:25,240 Speaker 1: but it's very small relative to the size of the 60 00:03:25,360 --> 00:03:29,320 Speaker 1: US economy, so it's hard to claim that's their material damage. 61 00:03:29,720 --> 00:03:35,800 Speaker 1: So I think these are very much negotiating pillars. I 62 00:03:35,840 --> 00:03:38,839 Speaker 1: do think that there is attempt by the Trumpet administration 63 00:03:39,040 --> 00:03:43,200 Speaker 1: to link these tariffs to different types of side deals. 64 00:03:43,720 --> 00:03:47,440 Speaker 1: So while there may be they're set in stone for now, 65 00:03:47,960 --> 00:03:49,559 Speaker 1: there's still room for negotiation. 66 00:03:50,920 --> 00:03:53,440 Speaker 5: It's interesting to me that when it comes to probably 67 00:03:53,440 --> 00:03:57,400 Speaker 5: the toughest and obviously the most implications coming from the 68 00:03:57,440 --> 00:04:00,520 Speaker 5: set of negotiations between the US and China, is this 69 00:04:00,560 --> 00:04:02,440 Speaker 5: a kicking of the can down the road, that they're 70 00:04:02,480 --> 00:04:05,760 Speaker 5: just going to do another extension Because fundamentally, you know, 71 00:04:06,000 --> 00:04:09,840 Speaker 5: there are very complex and structural issues in these talks. 72 00:04:10,680 --> 00:04:14,240 Speaker 1: So China is very difficult to manage given them what 73 00:04:14,280 --> 00:04:18,240 Speaker 1: the supply chain linkages and what the implications are for 74 00:04:18,400 --> 00:04:24,160 Speaker 1: many of you large US companies. And consequently, there is 75 00:04:24,839 --> 00:04:28,720 Speaker 1: a there is a sense by just put and posing 76 00:04:28,720 --> 00:04:32,479 Speaker 1: a particular tariff, it's not going to actually solve the problem. 77 00:04:33,000 --> 00:04:35,760 Speaker 1: Apple isn't going to remove all of its production that's 78 00:04:35,800 --> 00:04:38,680 Speaker 1: in China to the US. It's just not a feasible 79 00:04:39,240 --> 00:04:42,280 Speaker 1: action to take in order to anticipate. And so the 80 00:04:42,400 --> 00:04:46,040 Speaker 1: question is, how does the Trump administration manage what they 81 00:04:46,080 --> 00:04:52,800 Speaker 1: perceive as discriminatory or unfair trade practices by raising the 82 00:04:53,120 --> 00:04:55,799 Speaker 1: by using just such a blunt instrument as the tariff, 83 00:04:56,360 --> 00:04:59,159 Speaker 1: or are they going to have to think more systematically 84 00:04:59,240 --> 00:05:03,400 Speaker 1: or holistically about what the actual trade relations are and 85 00:05:03,440 --> 00:05:05,640 Speaker 1: why they exist as they do. 86 00:05:06,560 --> 00:05:08,760 Speaker 6: Y ieaf fearing that out. It's not always easy though, 87 00:05:08,760 --> 00:05:10,919 Speaker 6: And give you the case of Australia where we are 88 00:05:11,000 --> 00:05:14,000 Speaker 6: a ten percent tariff and Australia has a trade surplus 89 00:05:14,000 --> 00:05:17,080 Speaker 6: with the US, so it doesn't make a huge amount 90 00:05:17,120 --> 00:05:19,919 Speaker 6: of sense. Yet there's no US ambassador in Australia to 91 00:05:19,960 --> 00:05:22,000 Speaker 6: even raise this with, and a lot of other countries 92 00:05:22,000 --> 00:05:24,440 Speaker 6: are in the same boat. So in terms of trying 93 00:05:24,440 --> 00:05:26,600 Speaker 6: to negotiate a bit of deal, I mean, who do 94 00:05:26,640 --> 00:05:28,400 Speaker 6: you even pick up the phones of at this point? 95 00:05:29,240 --> 00:05:34,320 Speaker 1: That's a wonderful question. I would suggest Australia is in 96 00:05:34,400 --> 00:05:36,839 Speaker 1: the I don't know, I don't call it envis but 97 00:05:37,200 --> 00:05:39,760 Speaker 1: they're not on the hit list in the sense is 98 00:05:39,800 --> 00:05:44,920 Speaker 1: that they do not have a trade deficit, a tree 99 00:05:44,920 --> 00:05:48,719 Speaker 1: deficit with from the US perspective, and consequently they are 100 00:05:48,760 --> 00:05:53,560 Speaker 1: not going to be part of these complex negotiations as 101 00:05:53,560 --> 00:05:57,120 Speaker 1: we're seeing with China and other countries like Brazil and India, 102 00:05:57,160 --> 00:06:01,200 Speaker 1: which actually do have interesting patterns of trade, some of 103 00:06:01,240 --> 00:06:04,800 Speaker 1: which are very complementary to the United States and necessary 104 00:06:05,000 --> 00:06:09,240 Speaker 1: given what our production process is. Other times it's just 105 00:06:10,839 --> 00:06:13,479 Speaker 1: they're just a comparative advantage. It makes much more sense 106 00:06:13,600 --> 00:06:18,839 Speaker 1: for the labor intensive country like India to be producing 107 00:06:19,040 --> 00:06:22,200 Speaker 1: textiles or more labor intensive goods. This is sort of 108 00:06:22,200 --> 00:06:26,320 Speaker 1: the theory of comparative vantage. So we can go on 109 00:06:26,560 --> 00:06:30,960 Speaker 1: about each of these individual cases. Unfortunately, what's going to 110 00:06:31,040 --> 00:06:34,840 Speaker 1: happen in the end is that there'll be significant pushbacks 111 00:06:34,880 --> 00:06:39,240 Speaker 1: from partners and what we'll find is that there'll be 112 00:06:39,320 --> 00:06:43,160 Speaker 1: segmentation of the global market. And that's what we're slowly 113 00:06:43,200 --> 00:06:47,679 Speaker 1: starting to see with Europe, with these of the Asian 114 00:06:47,760 --> 00:06:52,039 Speaker 1: countries start developing their own sort of regional trading patterns. 115 00:06:52,920 --> 00:06:54,920 Speaker 6: Yeah, I wanted to pick up on that point as well. 116 00:06:55,200 --> 00:06:58,960 Speaker 6: Is that something you see more of, is that countries 117 00:06:58,960 --> 00:07:01,880 Speaker 6: that are still interested in free and open trade starting 118 00:07:01,880 --> 00:07:04,680 Speaker 6: to film packs and relationships with each other and put 119 00:07:04,680 --> 00:07:07,120 Speaker 6: it to you, perhaps potentially with China at the standup. 120 00:07:08,040 --> 00:07:13,040 Speaker 1: Absolutely, Europe is a good point and example. They are 121 00:07:13,320 --> 00:07:16,680 Speaker 1: definitely trying to build up their own types of trade relations. 122 00:07:17,640 --> 00:07:21,080 Speaker 1: They too, have found themselves in the situation where they 123 00:07:21,160 --> 00:07:25,800 Speaker 1: have an imbalance in trade between themselves in China, and 124 00:07:25,880 --> 00:07:28,840 Speaker 1: so what does that look like. But building up different 125 00:07:28,880 --> 00:07:34,720 Speaker 1: types of scale and markets within the regional trading partners 126 00:07:34,800 --> 00:07:37,600 Speaker 1: is going to be a strategy that we're going to 127 00:07:37,600 --> 00:07:44,040 Speaker 1: be seeing both in Europe, both in Asia, Australia, all 128 00:07:44,080 --> 00:07:47,880 Speaker 1: of those types of large trading partners. The US has 129 00:07:47,920 --> 00:07:53,120 Speaker 1: trading partners with Mexico, Canada. It's other large partner is 130 00:07:53,320 --> 00:07:55,920 Speaker 1: the European Union, which really is its largest partner. But 131 00:07:56,040 --> 00:07:59,560 Speaker 1: I think that transatlantic trade is going to come under 132 00:07:59,600 --> 00:08:01,400 Speaker 1: a lot of all right. 133 00:08:01,440 --> 00:08:05,840 Speaker 6: Sharon O'Halloran, Professor of Political economy and International and Public 134 00:08:05,840 --> 00:08:08,600 Speaker 6: Affairs at Columbia University, Thanks so much for joining us. 135 00:08:15,720 --> 00:08:18,720 Speaker 2: Welcome back to the Daybreak Asia podcast. I'm Dan Schwartzman. 136 00:08:19,040 --> 00:08:21,520 Speaker 2: Doug Prisner is off this week. We'll get earnings in 137 00:08:21,560 --> 00:08:24,480 Speaker 2: the coming week from Japanese auto giants Toyota and Honda. 138 00:08:24,560 --> 00:08:26,760 Speaker 2: The reports will offer a fresh look at the automaker's 139 00:08:26,840 --> 00:08:29,680 Speaker 2: businesses and the impact US terrifs have had so far. 140 00:08:29,880 --> 00:08:32,160 Speaker 2: From more, we hear from Kota Yazawa, head of Asia 141 00:08:32,160 --> 00:08:34,920 Speaker 2: Auto Research at gold min Sachs. He spoke at Bloomberg's 142 00:08:34,920 --> 00:08:38,000 Speaker 2: Heidi Shroud Watts and Paul Allen on the Asia trade. 143 00:08:37,920 --> 00:08:40,600 Speaker 6: COOTA, thanks so much for joining us today. So looking 144 00:08:40,600 --> 00:08:43,319 Speaker 6: ahead to the earnings from Honda and Toyer to this week, 145 00:08:44,000 --> 00:08:46,760 Speaker 6: what sort of impact do you expect to see from 146 00:08:46,800 --> 00:08:49,160 Speaker 6: tariff's in the trade environment on the outlook? 147 00:08:49,880 --> 00:08:53,120 Speaker 7: Thank you for having me. Yes, we do expect the 148 00:08:53,440 --> 00:08:56,960 Speaker 7: type impact to be quite big for most of the 149 00:08:57,160 --> 00:09:00,560 Speaker 7: Japanese order, but it's probably less than feared. Based on 150 00:09:00,600 --> 00:09:03,559 Speaker 7: twenty five percent tariff over Japanese med vehicle, we were 151 00:09:03,600 --> 00:09:06,840 Speaker 7: expecting three point five three and negative impact across the 152 00:09:06,880 --> 00:09:10,240 Speaker 7: board for automotive sector in Japan, but now we can 153 00:09:10,360 --> 00:09:13,160 Speaker 7: probably see around the two three in en type of 154 00:09:13,360 --> 00:09:16,520 Speaker 7: negative impact, still a big number, but the relatively to 155 00:09:16,559 --> 00:09:20,200 Speaker 7: the twenty five percent a very recent type update was 156 00:09:20,280 --> 00:09:23,760 Speaker 7: a positive event and the lesson feared. 157 00:09:24,760 --> 00:09:27,640 Speaker 6: Yeah, in terms of the quarter that predated the trade 158 00:09:27,640 --> 00:09:30,800 Speaker 6: agreement between the US and Japan, what are you expecting 159 00:09:30,800 --> 00:09:32,920 Speaker 6: to see in terms of that impact on endings? You 160 00:09:32,960 --> 00:09:34,480 Speaker 6: know when it comes to front loading. 161 00:09:35,920 --> 00:09:39,360 Speaker 7: Well, I think we probably have to closely monitor the 162 00:09:39,400 --> 00:09:43,480 Speaker 7: situation over Mexico and Canada and the rest of the division. 163 00:09:44,120 --> 00:09:48,920 Speaker 7: Japan US trade negotiating went okay, So I think there 164 00:09:48,920 --> 00:09:51,559 Speaker 7: a should be a sertain you know, newmaker update from 165 00:09:51,679 --> 00:09:55,640 Speaker 7: the company management such as tot and Honda. At the 166 00:09:55,720 --> 00:10:00,000 Speaker 7: same time, we said that twotoring en type of negative impact, 167 00:10:00,120 --> 00:10:04,400 Speaker 7: there should be a mitigation effort that the Automaica will 168 00:10:04,400 --> 00:10:08,280 Speaker 7: probably try, including the price hike action in the United 169 00:10:08,320 --> 00:10:12,000 Speaker 7: States starting from September. So we're coustantly monitoring the situation 170 00:10:12,360 --> 00:10:16,080 Speaker 7: how much they could actually recover from the negative impact 171 00:10:16,120 --> 00:10:16,600 Speaker 7: of tariff. 172 00:10:17,720 --> 00:10:19,720 Speaker 5: Is the outlook when it comes to evs and hybrid 173 00:10:19,800 --> 00:10:22,240 Speaker 5: vehicles looking a little like it's going to gain a 174 00:10:22,240 --> 00:10:23,760 Speaker 5: bit more momentum. 175 00:10:24,920 --> 00:10:28,199 Speaker 7: I do think that the hybrid momentum will probably accelerate. 176 00:10:28,679 --> 00:10:33,199 Speaker 7: It's not directlyated to the tariff argument. I think it's 177 00:10:33,240 --> 00:10:39,000 Speaker 7: more like a milder environmental regulation from US government ACC 178 00:10:39,120 --> 00:10:44,120 Speaker 7: two councelation and also the milder mapro gallon regulation in 179 00:10:44,160 --> 00:10:47,720 Speaker 7: the United States. So starting from October, I do believe 180 00:10:47,760 --> 00:10:52,199 Speaker 7: that hybrid sales momentum would even accelerate in the United 181 00:10:52,200 --> 00:10:55,480 Speaker 7: States market on the back of the On the other hand, 182 00:10:55,559 --> 00:10:59,200 Speaker 7: probably battery to vehicle sales may probably potentially slow down. 183 00:10:59,440 --> 00:11:02,920 Speaker 7: For Japanese makers having a large exposure to hybrid sales, 184 00:11:03,360 --> 00:11:05,640 Speaker 7: les probably get benefit. In the second half of the year, 185 00:11:06,800 --> 00:11:07,280 Speaker 7: we've seen. 186 00:11:07,240 --> 00:11:09,800 Speaker 5: Japanese ought to make a sacrificing margin to an extent 187 00:11:09,880 --> 00:11:12,200 Speaker 5: to try and stay competitive, particularly when it comes to 188 00:11:12,200 --> 00:11:15,959 Speaker 5: the US market. Do you think this will change if 189 00:11:16,000 --> 00:11:19,559 Speaker 5: we start to see major suppliers passing through tarff costs, 190 00:11:19,840 --> 00:11:23,480 Speaker 5: logistics costs, and is that going to sort of alter 191 00:11:23,640 --> 00:11:24,840 Speaker 5: the pricing dynamic. 192 00:11:26,480 --> 00:11:29,400 Speaker 7: Well, I think not only Japanese makers but also all 193 00:11:29,559 --> 00:11:33,320 Speaker 7: you automaker operating in US probably have to think about 194 00:11:33,360 --> 00:11:38,599 Speaker 7: the price cycle at any case, and we expect a 195 00:11:38,679 --> 00:11:42,000 Speaker 7: model year change sometimes in September could be the one 196 00:11:42,040 --> 00:11:46,040 Speaker 7: trigger that all automaker will probably try and raise price 197 00:11:46,440 --> 00:11:48,679 Speaker 7: in order to mitigate some of the negative impact of 198 00:11:48,760 --> 00:11:52,640 Speaker 7: the tariffs and also the negative impact from the informational 199 00:11:52,720 --> 00:11:56,480 Speaker 7: pressure in the United States. Super U, one of the company, 200 00:11:57,280 --> 00:12:00,480 Speaker 7: already announced four point five percent price syking US back 201 00:12:00,480 --> 00:12:04,000 Speaker 7: in May twentieth, and so far the situation of the 202 00:12:04,040 --> 00:12:07,959 Speaker 7: sales momentum for that company not really deteriorating that much. 203 00:12:08,280 --> 00:12:12,160 Speaker 7: So I think if the price hike action would probably 204 00:12:13,120 --> 00:12:16,320 Speaker 7: happen all together, there could be a certain you know, 205 00:12:16,760 --> 00:12:20,920 Speaker 7: acceptance among japan among in the US consumers for this 206 00:12:21,280 --> 00:12:22,120 Speaker 7: kind of price hike. 207 00:12:23,800 --> 00:12:27,079 Speaker 6: Well, all Japanese automakers now facing tariffs in the US 208 00:12:27,120 --> 00:12:31,160 Speaker 6: that weren't there a year ago. To what degree can 209 00:12:31,400 --> 00:12:34,080 Speaker 6: Japanese automakers go to other markets that are now so 210 00:12:34,160 --> 00:12:36,679 Speaker 6: heavily protected to make up the gap. 211 00:12:38,480 --> 00:12:45,439 Speaker 7: Well, we see increasing competition in the Southeast Asia, Australia 212 00:12:45,520 --> 00:12:49,760 Speaker 7: and also the Latin America. Clearly competition is get intensified 213 00:12:50,440 --> 00:12:54,120 Speaker 7: based on this type of argument, not only Japanese makers 214 00:12:54,120 --> 00:12:57,440 Speaker 7: but also other Asian players. OEM would probably try to 215 00:12:57,679 --> 00:13:00,960 Speaker 7: gain market share in those countries in order to mitigate 216 00:13:01,000 --> 00:13:03,679 Speaker 7: the negative impact of the US. Having said that, as 217 00:13:03,720 --> 00:13:06,760 Speaker 7: I mentioned, if the incremental type of a Japanese may 218 00:13:06,760 --> 00:13:10,439 Speaker 7: be goals a twelve point five percent that's already determined, 219 00:13:10,800 --> 00:13:15,360 Speaker 7: then it is not easy, but it's manageable for almost 220 00:13:15,360 --> 00:13:19,520 Speaker 7: all Japanese maker to make up certain price action while 221 00:13:19,600 --> 00:13:22,079 Speaker 7: keeping market share in the US. So Japanese makers US 222 00:13:22,120 --> 00:13:25,680 Speaker 7: situation could be okay, then the rest of the country. Yes, 223 00:13:25,760 --> 00:13:28,840 Speaker 7: it's a competition, but all in all, I think Japanese 224 00:13:28,920 --> 00:13:32,160 Speaker 7: maker could probably maintain okay type of margin into the 225 00:13:32,200 --> 00:13:33,080 Speaker 7: second half of the year. 226 00:13:34,640 --> 00:13:36,760 Speaker 5: Do you expect that japan will have much success in 227 00:13:36,760 --> 00:13:39,360 Speaker 5: trying to push for lower towers and autos with the. 228 00:13:39,440 --> 00:13:44,760 Speaker 7: US, I do not think so. They're not really trying 229 00:13:44,800 --> 00:13:50,280 Speaker 7: to achieve volume or market share. They're clearly focusing on profitability. 230 00:13:50,840 --> 00:13:54,160 Speaker 7: And you know, with this price cycle there could be 231 00:13:54,200 --> 00:13:57,880 Speaker 7: a certain negative impact based on price aestheticity. But I 232 00:13:57,920 --> 00:14:02,280 Speaker 7: think the non no the Japanese maker would try, you know, 233 00:14:02,679 --> 00:14:05,280 Speaker 7: doing a massive promotion in it to just gain market 234 00:14:05,320 --> 00:14:07,800 Speaker 7: shia by sacrificing their margin. I don't really think so, 235 00:14:08,160 --> 00:14:11,840 Speaker 7: and quite nicely inclemental to one five percent not going 236 00:14:11,880 --> 00:14:16,360 Speaker 7: to make any automaka in a critically difficult situation. As 237 00:14:16,400 --> 00:14:18,920 Speaker 7: I mentioned, twelve or five percent is something manageable for 238 00:14:19,000 --> 00:14:19,840 Speaker 7: Japanese or to makers. 239 00:14:22,120 --> 00:14:24,640 Speaker 5: Cotch really great to have you with us. Kotter Zawa, 240 00:14:24,680 --> 00:14:27,360 Speaker 5: the head of Asia Auto Research at Gompen sax Journey, 241 00:14:27,400 --> 00:14:28,040 Speaker 5: is from Tokyo. 242 00:14:30,280 --> 00:14:33,640 Speaker 1: Thanks for listening to today's episode of the Bloomberg Daybreak 243 00:14:33,800 --> 00:14:37,200 Speaker 1: Asia Edition podcast. Each weekday, we look at the story 244 00:14:37,240 --> 00:14:41,280 Speaker 1: shaping markets, finance, and geopolitics in the Asia Pacific. 245 00:14:41,520 --> 00:14:44,800 Speaker 2: You can find us on Apple, Spotify, the Bloomberg Podcast 246 00:14:44,880 --> 00:14:47,200 Speaker 2: YouTube channel, or anywhere else you listen. 247 00:14:47,600 --> 00:14:50,520 Speaker 1: Join us again tomorrow for insight on the market moves 248 00:14:50,560 --> 00:14:55,080 Speaker 1: from Hong Kong to Singapore and Australia. I'm dereg prisoner, 249 00:14:55,280 --> 00:14:56,680 Speaker 1: and this is Bloomberg