WEBVTT - Tech News: The Future of Search is AI

0:00:04.480 --> 0:00:12.479
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Tech Stuff, a production from iHeartRadio. Hey therein

0:00:12.600 --> 0:00:16.079
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Tech Stuff. I'm your host, Jonathan Strickland. I'm

0:00:16.079 --> 0:00:19.639
<v Speaker 1>an executive producer with iHeart Podcasts and how the tech

0:00:19.680 --> 0:00:21.959
<v Speaker 1>are you. It's time for the tech news for the

0:00:22.000 --> 0:00:26.279
<v Speaker 1>week ending on Friday May seventeenth, twenty twenty four. And

0:00:26.400 --> 0:00:30.240
<v Speaker 1>this was a pretty big week in tech news. There

0:00:30.240 --> 0:00:33.879
<v Speaker 1>were a couple of large companies that made major announcements,

0:00:34.120 --> 0:00:36.239
<v Speaker 1>and then there were tons of other things going on.

0:00:36.600 --> 0:00:39.080
<v Speaker 1>So we're going to start off with open ai, the

0:00:39.120 --> 0:00:44.680
<v Speaker 1>company that is behind the chat GPT chatbot, among many

0:00:44.720 --> 0:00:48.920
<v Speaker 1>other things. I mentioned last week that the rumor mill

0:00:49.440 --> 0:00:54.200
<v Speaker 1>said open ai was on the verge of announcing an

0:00:54.240 --> 0:00:57.640
<v Speaker 1>AI powered search tool, which would pretty much be akin

0:00:57.760 --> 0:01:02.040
<v Speaker 1>to putting Google dead in the center of open AI's crosshairs,

0:01:02.200 --> 0:01:05.320
<v Speaker 1>because Google was just about to have it's Google Io

0:01:05.440 --> 0:01:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Developers conference, which we'll talk about in a second. And

0:01:08.160 --> 0:01:11.679
<v Speaker 1>open ai did release an announcement for a new AI

0:01:11.880 --> 0:01:16.400
<v Speaker 1>model that's called GPT four O and I think that's

0:01:16.440 --> 0:01:20.480
<v Speaker 1>the letter oh, not a zero. Anyway, this model is

0:01:20.520 --> 0:01:24.400
<v Speaker 1>meant to allow for actual voice conversations between human and

0:01:24.600 --> 0:01:28.880
<v Speaker 1>AI eventually, and open Ai says it'll also work across

0:01:28.920 --> 0:01:32.039
<v Speaker 1>image and video related tasks. So this is what they

0:01:32.080 --> 0:01:35.520
<v Speaker 1>call a multi modal approach to AI. It's not just

0:01:35.840 --> 0:01:40.960
<v Speaker 1>text based, it's other stuff too, And the concept is

0:01:41.040 --> 0:01:43.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of like you could have an image of something

0:01:43.680 --> 0:01:46.520
<v Speaker 1>or a video of something. You could be looking at

0:01:46.560 --> 0:01:51.520
<v Speaker 1>things through say your camera app on your phone, and

0:01:51.640 --> 0:01:56.720
<v Speaker 1>then talk to the AI assistant and try to get

0:01:56.760 --> 0:01:59.520
<v Speaker 1>information about what it is you're seeing. So we've seen

0:01:59.720 --> 0:02:02.320
<v Speaker 1>stuff like this or related to this in the past,

0:02:02.440 --> 0:02:05.760
<v Speaker 1>like holding your phone up to look at a sign

0:02:05.800 --> 0:02:09.240
<v Speaker 1>that's written in another language and have real time translation

0:02:09.400 --> 0:02:12.519
<v Speaker 1>to translate that into whatever your native language is. We've

0:02:12.520 --> 0:02:15.960
<v Speaker 1>seen that in the past. This would be more advanced,

0:02:16.040 --> 0:02:18.320
<v Speaker 1>much more advanced than that, you know. The example I

0:02:18.320 --> 0:02:21.320
<v Speaker 1>would think of is I would imagine like, say you're

0:02:21.400 --> 0:02:24.519
<v Speaker 1>starting up your car and the engines making a weird noise,

0:02:24.960 --> 0:02:28.400
<v Speaker 1>and so you turn your car off, you pop the

0:02:28.760 --> 0:02:31.960
<v Speaker 1>hood of your engine, and you're turning the car on

0:02:32.040 --> 0:02:33.720
<v Speaker 1>and you're trying to take a look and see what

0:02:33.760 --> 0:02:36.720
<v Speaker 1>it is that's possibly going wrong. Well, if you're like me,

0:02:37.240 --> 0:02:41.520
<v Speaker 1>you may only have a passing familiarity with that particular engine.

0:02:41.639 --> 0:02:46.440
<v Speaker 1>So an app that could hear and see the same

0:02:46.480 --> 0:02:49.840
<v Speaker 1>things that you do, but have access to an entire

0:02:50.440 --> 0:02:53.520
<v Speaker 1>world of information would be really useful. It could tell you, hey,

0:02:53.639 --> 0:02:55.640
<v Speaker 1>this is something you don't need to worry about right now,

0:02:55.800 --> 0:02:57.799
<v Speaker 1>or maybe it would tell you you need to get

0:02:57.840 --> 0:03:00.960
<v Speaker 1>your vehicle checked right away, or maybe even give you

0:03:01.480 --> 0:03:04.960
<v Speaker 1>a quick fix, if such a thing as even possible now.

0:03:05.520 --> 0:03:07.800
<v Speaker 1>In some ways, you could argue open ai is doing

0:03:08.280 --> 0:03:11.799
<v Speaker 1>kind of similar stuff to what we're seeing with other

0:03:11.960 --> 0:03:16.200
<v Speaker 1>personal digital assistants like Google Assistant or Siri or Alexa,

0:03:16.320 --> 0:03:20.080
<v Speaker 1>but just turbocharged. Open Ai did a real time demonstration

0:03:20.639 --> 0:03:26.640
<v Speaker 1>of the model's capabilities, something that would loom over Google

0:03:26.680 --> 0:03:29.520
<v Speaker 1>a little bit for their io event, but we'll get

0:03:29.560 --> 0:03:32.400
<v Speaker 1>to them in a second. Anyway. Chat GPT four oh

0:03:32.520 --> 0:03:35.600
<v Speaker 1>is rolling out now, but not all features are available

0:03:35.680 --> 0:03:38.320
<v Speaker 1>rail of the gate, so for example, it is not

0:03:38.480 --> 0:03:40.320
<v Speaker 1>able to talk to you just yet, or at least

0:03:40.320 --> 0:03:43.120
<v Speaker 1>not to me. I actually check to see if I

0:03:43.240 --> 0:03:46.520
<v Speaker 1>have access to Chat GPT four oh. I have a

0:03:46.960 --> 0:03:50.680
<v Speaker 1>chat GPT account that I never use, and so I

0:03:50.680 --> 0:03:52.680
<v Speaker 1>think I logged onto it for the first time in

0:03:52.920 --> 0:03:55.600
<v Speaker 1>maybe a year and found out that sure enough, I've

0:03:55.640 --> 0:03:59.000
<v Speaker 1>got access to it. But it doesn't talk to me yet.

0:03:59.240 --> 0:04:01.480
<v Speaker 1>The rollout is also going to be happening in batches,

0:04:01.600 --> 0:04:03.840
<v Speaker 1>So if you don't have access to it yet, even

0:04:03.880 --> 0:04:06.800
<v Speaker 1>though you have a chat gpt account, it is coming.

0:04:07.080 --> 0:04:10.400
<v Speaker 1>You can actually sign in now by going to chatgpt

0:04:10.640 --> 0:04:15.280
<v Speaker 1>dot com. They created that URL, so that's where the

0:04:15.360 --> 0:04:18.159
<v Speaker 1>service lives now. I think that kind of is a

0:04:18.200 --> 0:04:22.640
<v Speaker 1>sly indicator that they are transitioning from something that is

0:04:22.760 --> 0:04:25.839
<v Speaker 1>largely talked about as kind of a test product into

0:04:25.880 --> 0:04:30.560
<v Speaker 1>something that's an actual product. Existing chat gpt account holders

0:04:30.560 --> 0:04:33.320
<v Speaker 1>will receive access to four O capabilities over the next

0:04:33.320 --> 0:04:35.560
<v Speaker 1>several days if they don't have it already. And I

0:04:35.680 --> 0:04:38.080
<v Speaker 1>want to echo a warning that I've seen a lot

0:04:38.120 --> 0:04:40.479
<v Speaker 1>of other people make, because I think it's wise to

0:04:40.520 --> 0:04:45.320
<v Speaker 1>remember be careful if in your interactions with chat gpt

0:04:45.560 --> 0:04:49.960
<v Speaker 1>it suggests links to stuff, because apparently at least some

0:04:50.720 --> 0:04:54.919
<v Speaker 1>malicious folks have found ways to get chat gpt to

0:04:55.880 --> 0:05:00.279
<v Speaker 1>suggest links that ultimately lead to malicious website it's and

0:05:00.320 --> 0:05:06.360
<v Speaker 1>malicious software. So don't trust everything Chad Gbt says, particularly

0:05:06.400 --> 0:05:09.040
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to links. I think it's a really

0:05:09.080 --> 0:05:12.360
<v Speaker 1>interesting interaction that you can have with this thing. I

0:05:12.400 --> 0:05:17.960
<v Speaker 1>don't fully like it. I have concerns, and we'll talk

0:05:18.000 --> 0:05:21.800
<v Speaker 1>more about that in just a second. But beyond the

0:05:22.200 --> 0:05:25.880
<v Speaker 1>announcement that open ai made, they also managed to close

0:05:25.960 --> 0:05:29.159
<v Speaker 1>a deal with Reddit, which will give open ai permission

0:05:29.200 --> 0:05:33.800
<v Speaker 1>to train AI models on Reddit and subreddit posts. That's

0:05:33.800 --> 0:05:37.000
<v Speaker 1>something that folks had suspected open ai was already doing,

0:05:37.400 --> 0:05:39.719
<v Speaker 1>just you know, without the part about having permission to

0:05:39.760 --> 0:05:43.200
<v Speaker 1>do so. Reddit will in return get some access to

0:05:43.279 --> 0:05:46.200
<v Speaker 1>AI powered tools that can then be incorporated into the

0:05:46.320 --> 0:05:49.560
<v Speaker 1>platform in various ways. So Reddit is saying, hey, don't worry,

0:05:49.600 --> 0:05:53.159
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna have enhanced ways to interact with Reddit. Though

0:05:53.839 --> 0:05:57.680
<v Speaker 1>what those will actually be haven't, you know, been fully disclosed,

0:05:57.800 --> 0:06:00.680
<v Speaker 1>if you recall. Open Ai similarly sign to deal with

0:06:00.720 --> 0:06:03.760
<v Speaker 1>stack overflow not too long ago, which caused a bit

0:06:03.760 --> 0:06:05.880
<v Speaker 1>of a tiff in that community because a lot of

0:06:05.880 --> 0:06:08.960
<v Speaker 1>folks said they preferred their work not be used for

0:06:09.040 --> 0:06:12.719
<v Speaker 1>training AI. But the terms of service for stack overflow

0:06:12.720 --> 0:06:16.360
<v Speaker 1>are such that essentially, once you post something to the platform,

0:06:16.480 --> 0:06:19.560
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't belong to you anymore. It's the platforms. So

0:06:20.200 --> 0:06:22.880
<v Speaker 1>while you might object to your work being used to

0:06:22.880 --> 0:06:25.800
<v Speaker 1>train AI, you don't have any authority to deny it

0:06:25.839 --> 0:06:30.520
<v Speaker 1>from happening. Some people tried to deface or delete old posts,

0:06:30.560 --> 0:06:33.560
<v Speaker 1>but that's exactly that's against the terms of service on

0:06:33.600 --> 0:06:37.560
<v Speaker 1>stack overflow. So many of those people subsequently found themselves banned,

0:06:37.720 --> 0:06:40.640
<v Speaker 1>at least temporarily from that site. It'll be interesting to

0:06:40.640 --> 0:06:43.120
<v Speaker 1>see if there will be a similar backlash in the

0:06:43.120 --> 0:06:47.839
<v Speaker 1>Reddit community. That community is already kind of predisposed to

0:06:48.080 --> 0:06:52.360
<v Speaker 1>not liking the corporate leadership of Reddit. There's already pretty

0:06:52.400 --> 0:06:56.120
<v Speaker 1>low opinion of the company's leaders, largely because of changes

0:06:56.160 --> 0:06:59.640
<v Speaker 1>that Reddit made to its API like a year ago,

0:06:59.800 --> 0:07:03.600
<v Speaker 1>and apparently that's not the case with investors. Investors on

0:07:03.640 --> 0:07:07.080
<v Speaker 1>the flip side are pretty darn happy. Reuters reported that

0:07:07.160 --> 0:07:11.120
<v Speaker 1>shares were trading fourteen percent higher today than they were

0:07:11.240 --> 0:07:15.120
<v Speaker 1>yesterday in the wake of this news. Not all the

0:07:15.160 --> 0:07:18.840
<v Speaker 1>news is good news for open ai. Between announcements and partnerships,

0:07:18.840 --> 0:07:22.480
<v Speaker 1>two prominent individuals in the organization resigned from the company

0:07:22.520 --> 0:07:26.000
<v Speaker 1>this week. That would be Ilia Sutzkiver, who is a

0:07:26.040 --> 0:07:29.640
<v Speaker 1>co founder of open ai, one of the original members

0:07:29.880 --> 0:07:33.440
<v Speaker 1>of the non profit version of open ai, and the

0:07:33.480 --> 0:07:36.680
<v Speaker 1>other one is Jan Leika, an executive who gave a

0:07:36.720 --> 0:07:41.400
<v Speaker 1>pretty straightforward announcement on x their announcement. Just read quote

0:07:41.840 --> 0:07:45.080
<v Speaker 1>I resigned end quote. Now the alarming thing is both

0:07:45.120 --> 0:07:48.720
<v Speaker 1>Laikah and Sutzkiver worked for a department within open ai

0:07:48.920 --> 0:07:53.280
<v Speaker 1>called super Alignment, and essentially they were assigned a task

0:07:53.720 --> 0:07:56.560
<v Speaker 1>that was the need to make sure AI evolves in

0:07:56.600 --> 0:07:59.440
<v Speaker 1>a way that is helpful but not harmful. This was

0:07:59.520 --> 0:08:04.239
<v Speaker 1>kind of the central premise, the reison deetre of open

0:08:04.280 --> 0:08:07.680
<v Speaker 1>ai when it was first founded as a nonprofit organization.

0:08:07.840 --> 0:08:10.400
<v Speaker 1>The founders wanted to make certain that AI would be

0:08:10.440 --> 0:08:15.240
<v Speaker 1>developed in a responsible and accountable and transparent way in

0:08:15.360 --> 0:08:18.880
<v Speaker 1>order to maximize its benefits to humanity and minimize or

0:08:18.880 --> 0:08:23.640
<v Speaker 1>eliminate any risks. But it turns out AI is really expensive.

0:08:24.000 --> 0:08:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Like it's expensive to develop, it's expensive to implement and

0:08:27.600 --> 0:08:31.600
<v Speaker 1>to run and to maintain, and without a near constant

0:08:31.680 --> 0:08:35.680
<v Speaker 1>cash injection, open ai just wouldn't be around for very long,

0:08:35.880 --> 0:08:38.960
<v Speaker 1>which is why the organization ultimately spun off a for

0:08:39.240 --> 0:08:42.280
<v Speaker 1>profit arm, which is the version of open ai most

0:08:42.320 --> 0:08:46.120
<v Speaker 1>of us talk about today, like, it's not the nonprofit version,

0:08:46.160 --> 0:08:50.520
<v Speaker 1>it's the very aggressive for profit version that makes the

0:08:50.559 --> 0:08:55.680
<v Speaker 1>news and that created conflict within the organization. It led

0:08:55.760 --> 0:08:57.680
<v Speaker 1>up to the brief period in which the board of

0:08:57.720 --> 0:09:02.400
<v Speaker 1>directors removed Sam Altman as CEO of Open Ai, before

0:09:02.400 --> 0:09:04.680
<v Speaker 1>being pressured to turn around and put him right back

0:09:04.679 --> 0:09:08.000
<v Speaker 1>in charge again, and then subsequently the board of directors

0:09:08.320 --> 0:09:12.440
<v Speaker 1>essentially dissolved and reformed with new people. Sutzkever was actually

0:09:12.440 --> 0:09:15.880
<v Speaker 1>part of the effort to remove Altman, although he subsequently

0:09:16.080 --> 0:09:18.679
<v Speaker 1>apologized for that, so I don't think it's really a

0:09:18.679 --> 0:09:21.920
<v Speaker 1>big surprise that he has now left the company. But

0:09:21.960 --> 0:09:24.680
<v Speaker 1>I think anyone who is concerned about ethical approaches to

0:09:24.760 --> 0:09:28.120
<v Speaker 1>AI should really be aware that a lot of red

0:09:28.200 --> 0:09:32.760
<v Speaker 1>flags are going up right now. Okay, with that fun note,

0:09:33.080 --> 0:09:45.520
<v Speaker 1>let's take a quick break to thank our sponsors. We're back,

0:09:45.600 --> 0:09:48.160
<v Speaker 1>and now let us shift to Google, which, as I

0:09:48.240 --> 0:09:52.480
<v Speaker 1>mentioned earlier, held its annual IO Developer conference this week, and,

0:09:52.679 --> 0:09:56.440
<v Speaker 1>to the surprise of literally no one, much of the

0:09:56.480 --> 0:10:00.199
<v Speaker 1>conference touched on artificial intelligence. Now there are do you

0:10:00.240 --> 0:10:04.640
<v Speaker 1>have great headlines out there like Google aio or even

0:10:04.920 --> 0:10:09.720
<v Speaker 1>Google aiaio, et cetera. So there's so many out there,

0:10:09.880 --> 0:10:11.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm kind of sad that none are left for me.

0:10:11.640 --> 0:10:15.200
<v Speaker 1>But enough about that. Google announced an update to its

0:10:15.280 --> 0:10:20.200
<v Speaker 1>AI model Gemini. The company revealed that both the basic version,

0:10:20.280 --> 0:10:23.680
<v Speaker 1>called Gemini one point five Flash and the pro version

0:10:23.760 --> 0:10:27.360
<v Speaker 1>are available for public preview now. The primary function of

0:10:27.400 --> 0:10:31.640
<v Speaker 1>these specific AI models is to help developers create stuff,

0:10:31.920 --> 0:10:34.640
<v Speaker 1>so if a developer is working on an app, they

0:10:34.640 --> 0:10:38.920
<v Speaker 1>can make use of these models to help boost those efforts,

0:10:39.160 --> 0:10:43.679
<v Speaker 1>whether it's encoding or whatever. Google also revealed an updated

0:10:43.760 --> 0:10:47.960
<v Speaker 1>version of its assistant called Project Astra. Google showed a

0:10:48.000 --> 0:10:51.800
<v Speaker 1>pre recorded demonstration of the assistant's ability, and a Googler

0:10:51.960 --> 0:10:54.800
<v Speaker 1>was taking her phone around an office and asking questions

0:10:55.120 --> 0:10:59.320
<v Speaker 1>and having the camera app activated on her phone so

0:10:59.360 --> 0:11:02.320
<v Speaker 1>she could point the camera at something and ask a

0:11:02.480 --> 0:11:05.920
<v Speaker 1>question about the thing that's on screen, and the an

0:11:05.960 --> 0:11:09.160
<v Speaker 1>Astra would answer. So one point, for example, she asks

0:11:09.200 --> 0:11:12.360
<v Speaker 1>the assistant to point out anything that makes sound, and

0:11:12.400 --> 0:11:15.880
<v Speaker 1>she scans a desk, and when she brings the camera

0:11:15.960 --> 0:11:18.800
<v Speaker 1>in view of a speaker, the assistant says, that's a speaker,

0:11:19.080 --> 0:11:22.960
<v Speaker 1>and then she actually uses a markup feature to circle

0:11:23.320 --> 0:11:25.880
<v Speaker 1>the tweeter on the speaker, and she asks a follow

0:11:25.960 --> 0:11:28.240
<v Speaker 1>up question saying what is this part of the speaker called,

0:11:28.520 --> 0:11:31.079
<v Speaker 1>and the assistant says, that's the tweeter. Then it explains

0:11:31.120 --> 0:11:33.520
<v Speaker 1>what the tweeter does, which is to playback you know,

0:11:33.720 --> 0:11:36.960
<v Speaker 1>higher pitched sounds, higher frequency sounds, so it was a

0:11:37.000 --> 0:11:40.280
<v Speaker 1>cool demonstration. She pointed out the window and asked, you know,

0:11:40.360 --> 0:11:43.960
<v Speaker 1>essentially like what's this neighborhood? And the assistant answered, and

0:11:44.520 --> 0:11:47.600
<v Speaker 1>she at one point even said that she had misplaced

0:11:47.640 --> 0:11:50.120
<v Speaker 1>her glasses and asked the assistant if it knew where

0:11:50.160 --> 0:11:53.200
<v Speaker 1>her glasses were, And because she had been walking through

0:11:53.200 --> 0:11:56.280
<v Speaker 1>the office with the camera on, the app was able

0:11:56.320 --> 0:12:00.280
<v Speaker 1>to reference that information and it was able to pick

0:12:00.280 --> 0:12:03.920
<v Speaker 1>out a moment where the camera saw some glasses on

0:12:04.160 --> 0:12:07.520
<v Speaker 1>a desk, and it directed her to those glasses, which,

0:12:07.760 --> 0:12:10.160
<v Speaker 1>from what I understand, that's what got the biggest reaction

0:12:10.360 --> 0:12:12.720
<v Speaker 1>from the crowd, which was kind of cool. I mean,

0:12:12.920 --> 0:12:15.880
<v Speaker 1>goodness knows, I misplaced things all the time, so it'd

0:12:15.880 --> 0:12:19.280
<v Speaker 1>be good to have, you know, an assistant that could

0:12:19.320 --> 0:12:21.400
<v Speaker 1>tell me, yeah, no, that's in your hand. You'd do

0:12:21.559 --> 0:12:26.280
<v Speaker 1>fas anyway. Later on, Googler Michael Chang somewhat cheekily shared

0:12:26.280 --> 0:12:29.439
<v Speaker 1>on X now known as you know X it used

0:12:29.480 --> 0:12:31.720
<v Speaker 1>to be known as Twitter that he had watched the

0:12:31.840 --> 0:12:36.720
<v Speaker 1>Open AI announcement on Monday with Astra, which is kind

0:12:36.760 --> 0:12:38.800
<v Speaker 1>of funny because you know, the whole thing was that

0:12:38.840 --> 0:12:41.640
<v Speaker 1>Open AI was doing this sort of to undermine Google

0:12:41.720 --> 0:12:44.360
<v Speaker 1>and that Michael Chang saying, yeah, I watched it along

0:12:44.360 --> 0:12:48.040
<v Speaker 1>with Project Astra, and Project Astra made a real time

0:12:48.520 --> 0:12:53.240
<v Speaker 1>transcript of that presentation, complete with attributions for each speaker,

0:12:53.360 --> 0:12:57.200
<v Speaker 1>so identifying who was speaking in the transcript as it

0:12:57.280 --> 0:13:00.280
<v Speaker 1>was going on. That's pretty impressive, and also giving some

0:13:00.320 --> 0:13:04.560
<v Speaker 1>commentary about the presentation as it went on. The demonstration

0:13:04.600 --> 0:13:08.000
<v Speaker 1>of the AI interpreting images and giving relevant responses was

0:13:08.120 --> 0:13:10.680
<v Speaker 1>really interesting, but again, it was pre recorded. It wasn't

0:13:10.720 --> 0:13:13.720
<v Speaker 1>like it was a live demo. Google also demonstrate an

0:13:13.800 --> 0:13:18.360
<v Speaker 1>updated image generation AI model called imagen three. On top

0:13:18.400 --> 0:13:22.280
<v Speaker 1>of images, Google showed off a music AI sandbox to

0:13:22.360 --> 0:13:25.360
<v Speaker 1>let folks use AI to put musicians and composers out

0:13:25.360 --> 0:13:28.480
<v Speaker 1>of a job. No, I'm sorry, that's not a messaging

0:13:28.520 --> 0:13:32.199
<v Speaker 1>they wanted. I mean to help artists elevate their creativity

0:13:32.400 --> 0:13:35.320
<v Speaker 1>through the use of AI. I looked at these I

0:13:35.400 --> 0:13:37.920
<v Speaker 1>just got to see demos. I don't have access to

0:13:37.960 --> 0:13:41.320
<v Speaker 1>the tools themselves because I'm not a notable musician. I'm

0:13:41.320 --> 0:13:43.840
<v Speaker 1>not really a musician at all, so I don't have

0:13:43.920 --> 0:13:48.520
<v Speaker 1>access to these things. But it's both fascinating and concerning.

0:13:48.840 --> 0:13:53.120
<v Speaker 1>Because I have a lot of respect for actual musical artists,

0:13:53.160 --> 0:13:57.319
<v Speaker 1>and I don't like the idea of people who are

0:13:57.320 --> 0:14:01.760
<v Speaker 1>really talented and creative potentially getting pushed aside for something

0:14:01.880 --> 0:14:07.120
<v Speaker 1>that is perhaps easier to access and maybe cheaper. That's

0:14:07.160 --> 0:14:10.600
<v Speaker 1>not great. I think people's talent and time is worth money,

0:14:10.880 --> 0:14:13.040
<v Speaker 1>like I think it's worth paying for and that you know,

0:14:13.080 --> 0:14:15.920
<v Speaker 1>you can't just expect something for free, and anything that

0:14:16.000 --> 0:14:19.920
<v Speaker 1>undercuts that really concerns me a lot. Google also announced

0:14:20.000 --> 0:14:23.680
<v Speaker 1>video FX, which you guessed it uses generative AI to

0:14:23.760 --> 0:14:28.120
<v Speaker 1>create video clips, which again raise lots of concerns, like

0:14:28.480 --> 0:14:31.120
<v Speaker 1>the more you're seeing of AI generated content, the more

0:14:31.120 --> 0:14:36.080
<v Speaker 1>you're worried about how reliable is the stuff you are seeing.

0:14:36.600 --> 0:14:40.320
<v Speaker 1>Whether it's you know, a listing for a real estate property,

0:14:40.680 --> 0:14:43.320
<v Speaker 1>like who's to say it wasn't a picture that was

0:14:43.360 --> 0:14:46.840
<v Speaker 1>then enhanced by AI to make the house look way

0:14:47.000 --> 0:14:50.760
<v Speaker 1>nicer than it really is, Or maybe it's something where

0:14:50.880 --> 0:14:53.080
<v Speaker 1>it's a it's a video clip that seems to put

0:14:53.160 --> 0:14:57.640
<v Speaker 1>a public figure in a bad light, and you start wondering, Okay,

0:14:57.640 --> 0:14:59.720
<v Speaker 1>well is this real or is this something that was

0:14:59.760 --> 0:15:02.000
<v Speaker 1>created by someone who just has an axe to grind

0:15:02.040 --> 0:15:04.640
<v Speaker 1>for whatever reason these are things that are getting more

0:15:04.680 --> 0:15:09.280
<v Speaker 1>and more relevant. Arguably they are incredibly relevant right now. Now.

0:15:09.320 --> 0:15:11.880
<v Speaker 1>The thing that is probably going to have the largest impact,

0:15:12.160 --> 0:15:15.520
<v Speaker 1>at least the earliest for most folks, is Google implementing

0:15:15.560 --> 0:15:19.000
<v Speaker 1>more AI into its search tool, which is of course

0:15:19.040 --> 0:15:22.720
<v Speaker 1>what Google is primarily known for, even though it's arguably

0:15:22.760 --> 0:15:26.040
<v Speaker 1>really an advertising company, it's known for search. The company

0:15:26.040 --> 0:15:30.000
<v Speaker 1>announced that AI overviews in search is going to be

0:15:30.480 --> 0:15:32.880
<v Speaker 1>rolling out nationwide in the United States this week, so

0:15:33.040 --> 0:15:35.400
<v Speaker 1>if you live in the United States, you probably have

0:15:35.560 --> 0:15:39.880
<v Speaker 1>this incorporated in your search right now. Google also said

0:15:39.920 --> 0:15:43.560
<v Speaker 1>that multi step reasoning capabilities are coming soon, which means

0:15:43.600 --> 0:15:46.800
<v Speaker 1>that you'll be able to ask more complex questions in

0:15:46.840 --> 0:15:50.360
<v Speaker 1>your search query and to get relevant answers. So, like,

0:15:50.960 --> 0:15:53.360
<v Speaker 1>here's an example I just made up, how do I

0:15:53.400 --> 0:15:56.280
<v Speaker 1>make a lasagna? And what cheese is a good substitute

0:15:56.320 --> 0:15:59.040
<v Speaker 1>if I don't have ricotta? Right, Because that's a two

0:15:59.080 --> 0:16:01.840
<v Speaker 1>part question. It's one asking what are the steps to

0:16:01.840 --> 0:16:04.440
<v Speaker 1>make a lasagna? And I know I already know I

0:16:04.520 --> 0:16:08.560
<v Speaker 1>don't have an ingredient that's in a lot of lasagna recipes,

0:16:08.680 --> 0:16:12.000
<v Speaker 1>So what is a good substitute? That's the sort of

0:16:12.040 --> 0:16:15.040
<v Speaker 1>thing that you can expect to be able to access

0:16:15.160 --> 0:16:17.840
<v Speaker 1>in the not too distant future. The various keynotes and

0:16:17.880 --> 0:16:22.640
<v Speaker 1>presentations stretched across multiple days, so there was so much

0:16:22.680 --> 0:16:25.640
<v Speaker 1>more brought up during the IO event. But I think

0:16:25.680 --> 0:16:27.960
<v Speaker 1>the real message for most of us, the people who

0:16:28.000 --> 0:16:30.720
<v Speaker 1>aren't like actively developers, that we should take home is

0:16:30.840 --> 0:16:32.680
<v Speaker 1>just that AI is going to be all up in

0:16:32.720 --> 0:16:38.960
<v Speaker 1>your business and soon. Google hasn't just been talking to developers, however,

0:16:39.200 --> 0:16:42.040
<v Speaker 1>the company has also been pushing out updates to its browser,

0:16:42.280 --> 0:16:45.800
<v Speaker 1>Google Chrome, and this is not part of its all AI,

0:16:46.080 --> 0:16:50.680
<v Speaker 1>all the time strategy. Instead, Google is addressing some zero

0:16:50.760 --> 0:16:53.600
<v Speaker 1>day vulnerabilities that have come to light over the last

0:16:53.640 --> 0:16:56.600
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks, three of them in fact, recently. These

0:16:56.680 --> 0:17:00.400
<v Speaker 1>vulnerabilities are severe. Potentially hackers would be able to quote

0:17:00.440 --> 0:17:03.560
<v Speaker 1>perform an out of bounds memory right via a crafted

0:17:03.680 --> 0:17:07.399
<v Speaker 1>HTML page end quote that's from Google. That's not good.

0:17:07.680 --> 0:17:11.639
<v Speaker 1>It could mean that you could have a vulnerability activated

0:17:11.680 --> 0:17:14.879
<v Speaker 1>and then you visit a malicious website and then either

0:17:14.920 --> 0:17:18.560
<v Speaker 1>get malware downloaded to your computer or worse. So this

0:17:18.640 --> 0:17:21.920
<v Speaker 1>is a gentle reminder to all of y'all that it's

0:17:22.040 --> 0:17:25.040
<v Speaker 1>never a good idea to just push off installing updates

0:17:25.080 --> 0:17:28.760
<v Speaker 1>on stuff like web browsers and operating systems, because doing

0:17:28.800 --> 0:17:31.520
<v Speaker 1>that puts you at risk for malware or worse. I

0:17:31.560 --> 0:17:34.239
<v Speaker 1>know it's a hassle to have to update, especially if

0:17:34.320 --> 0:17:36.639
<v Speaker 1>you get to your machine and you've got like a

0:17:36.680 --> 0:17:38.480
<v Speaker 1>specific thing you need to do, and then the first

0:17:38.520 --> 0:17:41.080
<v Speaker 1>thing you see is a notification saying that you should

0:17:41.119 --> 0:17:43.320
<v Speaker 1>run an update. I know that's a hassle. It happens

0:17:43.320 --> 0:17:45.480
<v Speaker 1>to me too, and I hate it too, But it's

0:17:45.520 --> 0:17:47.520
<v Speaker 1>a good idea to go ahead and do the update

0:17:48.400 --> 0:17:50.920
<v Speaker 1>ninety nine times out of one hundred. One time out

0:17:50.920 --> 0:17:52.640
<v Speaker 1>of one hundred, it ends up being the wrong thing

0:17:52.680 --> 0:17:55.959
<v Speaker 1>to do, But when it's a ninety nine percent success, right,

0:17:56.000 --> 0:17:58.760
<v Speaker 1>you should probably do it. Also, hey, fun concept AI

0:17:58.840 --> 0:18:03.080
<v Speaker 1>can now help hackers discover and exploit vulnerabilities, So it's

0:18:03.240 --> 0:18:06.119
<v Speaker 1>just gonna get worse. Brave New World and all that

0:18:06.200 --> 0:18:10.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of stuff. Apple iOS beta testers say that iOS

0:18:10.040 --> 0:18:13.600
<v Speaker 1>build seventeen point five has a disturbing habit of bringing

0:18:13.640 --> 0:18:15.800
<v Speaker 1>the dead back to life. And so I'm not talking

0:18:15.840 --> 0:18:21.000
<v Speaker 1>about reanimated goules here. I'm talking about deleted material, like

0:18:21.080 --> 0:18:25.119
<v Speaker 1>deleted photos or deleted voicemails. According to a Reddit thread,

0:18:25.400 --> 0:18:28.960
<v Speaker 1>some users have reported iOS digging up old and sometimes

0:18:29.000 --> 0:18:32.240
<v Speaker 1>deleted photos and then showcasing them as if they are

0:18:32.359 --> 0:18:36.280
<v Speaker 1>recent images. So you pull up your app and say, huh,

0:18:36.520 --> 0:18:40.440
<v Speaker 1>according to this, this picture I took seven years ago

0:18:40.680 --> 0:18:44.560
<v Speaker 1>is a new one. Apparently in some cases this has

0:18:44.680 --> 0:18:48.440
<v Speaker 1>included images that people once took but long since deleted,

0:18:48.560 --> 0:18:55.000
<v Speaker 1>including nudes. Nude photos. That should be a massive concern

0:18:55.119 --> 0:18:59.080
<v Speaker 1>because Apple's stated practice is that once you delete a photo,

0:18:59.680 --> 0:19:02.840
<v Speaker 1>then you have thirty days in which you can recover

0:19:02.960 --> 0:19:06.520
<v Speaker 1>the deleted photo. But after thirty days, that photo is

0:19:06.560 --> 0:19:10.600
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be deleted for good. So if, as some

0:19:10.640 --> 0:19:14.959
<v Speaker 1>people have claimed, some of these photos have reappeared reportedly

0:19:15.160 --> 0:19:19.760
<v Speaker 1>years after they were first deleted, that raises serious privacy questions.

0:19:20.080 --> 0:19:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Right Like, if you took a nude photo seven years ago,

0:19:23.480 --> 0:19:26.520
<v Speaker 1>then like six and a half years ago, you deleted it.

0:19:26.800 --> 0:19:29.199
<v Speaker 1>You do not expect that seven year old photo to

0:19:29.240 --> 0:19:33.240
<v Speaker 1>come bouncing back today. That would be really shocking, and

0:19:33.280 --> 0:19:36.800
<v Speaker 1>it does again raise real questions about data retention and

0:19:36.840 --> 0:19:40.480
<v Speaker 1>privacy and security. At least one Reddit user claimed that

0:19:40.560 --> 0:19:43.520
<v Speaker 1>they had sold an old iPad to a friend of theirs,

0:19:43.680 --> 0:19:47.560
<v Speaker 1>but they had gone through Apple's process to wipe their

0:19:47.600 --> 0:19:51.000
<v Speaker 1>own personal data off of the iPad before selling it. So,

0:19:51.000 --> 0:19:53.880
<v Speaker 1>in other words, just making sure that you're reverting back

0:19:53.920 --> 0:19:57.560
<v Speaker 1>to like factory settings and deleting all personal information, but

0:19:57.720 --> 0:20:02.000
<v Speaker 1>that some of their old not safe for work photographs

0:20:02.040 --> 0:20:05.440
<v Speaker 1>have been popping back up on their friend's device. Now

0:20:05.800 --> 0:20:08.760
<v Speaker 1>surprise friend that you didn't expect to see your buddy

0:20:09.480 --> 0:20:14.240
<v Speaker 1>in their glory. This is not good news at all,

0:20:14.520 --> 0:20:16.720
<v Speaker 1>if in fact it is true. So I have to

0:20:16.800 --> 0:20:19.479
<v Speaker 1>keep on stressing if it is true, because I haven't

0:20:19.520 --> 0:20:24.199
<v Speaker 1>seen confirmation from anyone other than people commenting on Reddit.

0:20:24.400 --> 0:20:26.359
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you know this, but sometimes people

0:20:26.359 --> 0:20:29.040
<v Speaker 1>on Reddit say things that are perhaps not one hundred

0:20:29.040 --> 0:20:33.080
<v Speaker 1>percent true. A lot of subreddits are almost exclusively made

0:20:33.160 --> 0:20:36.840
<v Speaker 1>up of fiction anyway. Wes Davis of The Verge extends

0:20:37.040 --> 0:20:39.880
<v Speaker 1>some grace to Apple and points out that this might

0:20:39.920 --> 0:20:43.639
<v Speaker 1>not be a case of Apple doing something insidious or

0:20:43.680 --> 0:20:48.720
<v Speaker 1>being really negligent. That deleted data is never really gone

0:20:49.000 --> 0:20:52.600
<v Speaker 1>until some other information gets overwritten on top of what

0:20:52.880 --> 0:20:55.960
<v Speaker 1>once was there. And that's true if you delete something

0:20:56.000 --> 0:20:59.080
<v Speaker 1>off your hard drive, but you don't overwrite information on

0:20:59.160 --> 0:21:03.320
<v Speaker 1>top of where that drive was, you know, storing stuff

0:21:03.600 --> 0:21:06.800
<v Speaker 1>it can be possible to recover the deleted information. So

0:21:06.960 --> 0:21:09.959
<v Speaker 1>maybe that's what's happened at Apple, just you know, on

0:21:10.000 --> 0:21:13.000
<v Speaker 1>a much much larger scale. Now, personally, I find that

0:21:13.040 --> 0:21:16.200
<v Speaker 1>a little hard to swallow because the trend has been

0:21:16.280 --> 0:21:19.560
<v Speaker 1>for more folks to use more Apple services over time.

0:21:20.040 --> 0:21:23.159
<v Speaker 1>So you would think if more people are using those services,

0:21:23.400 --> 0:21:27.600
<v Speaker 1>that stuff would be overwritten all the time, because otherwise

0:21:27.640 --> 0:21:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Apple would just have to keep on adding additional servers

0:21:31.160 --> 0:21:34.920
<v Speaker 1>to handle incoming images and voicemails and all the other stuff,

0:21:35.160 --> 0:21:37.760
<v Speaker 1>because you know the otherwise. The implication is that, well,

0:21:37.800 --> 0:21:41.960
<v Speaker 1>we haven't overwritten everything that you know has been freed

0:21:42.040 --> 0:21:44.919
<v Speaker 1>up since people have deleted things. I can't even be

0:21:45.000 --> 0:21:47.360
<v Speaker 1>sure that the claims that are being made are accurate.

0:21:47.480 --> 0:21:50.040
<v Speaker 1>So it's possible that some of these quote unquote deleted

0:21:50.080 --> 0:21:52.919
<v Speaker 1>files weren't really deleted at all. Maybe they were just

0:21:52.960 --> 0:21:56.760
<v Speaker 1>forgotten about, because goodness knows that happens too. But the

0:21:56.880 --> 0:22:00.600
<v Speaker 1>story about the wipe dipad in particular is trouble if

0:22:00.720 --> 0:22:04.800
<v Speaker 1>it is true, So just something to be aware of. Again,

0:22:04.840 --> 0:22:08.040
<v Speaker 1>that's for iOS seventeen point five, and it's in beta,

0:22:08.119 --> 0:22:11.440
<v Speaker 1>so if you're not beta testing, then this isn't likely

0:22:11.520 --> 0:22:15.280
<v Speaker 1>to affect you if you're an iOS user, but I'm

0:22:15.280 --> 0:22:17.800
<v Speaker 1>sure it's something that Apple is looking into to figure

0:22:17.800 --> 0:22:22.600
<v Speaker 1>out before iOS eighteen goes out. All right, we got

0:22:22.840 --> 0:22:25.480
<v Speaker 1>more stories to cover, but before we can get to

0:22:25.520 --> 0:22:37.719
<v Speaker 1>all of those, let's take another quick break. We're back,

0:22:37.960 --> 0:22:42.000
<v Speaker 1>and here's a story that hit like deja vus this

0:22:42.080 --> 0:22:44.880
<v Speaker 1>week at centers around the company game Stop, and it's

0:22:45.080 --> 0:22:48.760
<v Speaker 1>stock price. So you might remember that back in twenty

0:22:48.800 --> 0:22:51.480
<v Speaker 1>twenty one, a collection of folks decided to stick it

0:22:51.520 --> 0:22:55.080
<v Speaker 1>to some hedge funds by investing in game Stop because

0:22:55.119 --> 0:22:58.200
<v Speaker 1>word got out that some massive hedge funds were short

0:22:58.240 --> 0:23:02.040
<v Speaker 1>selling game Stop. By driving the price of the stock up,

0:23:02.119 --> 0:23:04.640
<v Speaker 1>the investors could do two things. One, they could see

0:23:04.640 --> 0:23:06.919
<v Speaker 1>a return on their own investment, right because if the

0:23:06.920 --> 0:23:11.040
<v Speaker 1>stock goes up, then you're making profit. And two, they

0:23:11.040 --> 0:23:15.200
<v Speaker 1>could cause serious financial hardship for these massive hedge funds

0:23:15.200 --> 0:23:18.840
<v Speaker 1>that typically hold a tremendous amount of power in the

0:23:18.880 --> 0:23:21.840
<v Speaker 1>stock market. Now, if you're not familiar with how short

0:23:21.880 --> 0:23:25.440
<v Speaker 1>selling goes, let me give you a very basic description,

0:23:25.600 --> 0:23:28.720
<v Speaker 1>and I'm glossing over a lot of details here. Let's

0:23:28.720 --> 0:23:32.800
<v Speaker 1>say that you believe a particular stock is going to

0:23:32.880 --> 0:23:36.280
<v Speaker 1>decline in value. So you decide, hey, I'm going to

0:23:36.320 --> 0:23:38.560
<v Speaker 1>make some money with stock going down. I'm going to

0:23:38.720 --> 0:23:41.520
<v Speaker 1>sell stock that I don't actually own, and i'm going

0:23:41.560 --> 0:23:44.000
<v Speaker 1>to sell it at what it is currently trading for.

0:23:44.240 --> 0:23:46.959
<v Speaker 1>So let's say that it's currently trading for ten dollars

0:23:46.960 --> 0:23:49.960
<v Speaker 1>per share. So you sell one hundred shares at ten

0:23:50.040 --> 0:23:53.000
<v Speaker 1>dollars per share, but you don't own those shares, So

0:23:53.000 --> 0:23:55.720
<v Speaker 1>you're literally selling stock you do not own, but you

0:23:55.760 --> 0:23:59.439
<v Speaker 1>have the promise of delivering that money, or rather the stock,

0:23:59.720 --> 0:24:02.760
<v Speaker 1>in a certain amount of time. Let's say it's one month. Now,

0:24:02.760 --> 0:24:05.239
<v Speaker 1>a month has gone by, and it's time for you

0:24:05.320 --> 0:24:08.879
<v Speaker 1>to deliver the stock that you've promised. At this point,

0:24:08.920 --> 0:24:11.480
<v Speaker 1>the stock has gone down to one dollar per share.

0:24:11.640 --> 0:24:14.159
<v Speaker 1>Now you previously sold it for ten dollars per share,

0:24:14.480 --> 0:24:18.280
<v Speaker 1>so you get to buy up the amount of stock

0:24:18.320 --> 0:24:21.200
<v Speaker 1>you agreed to handover in the transaction, and you get

0:24:21.200 --> 0:24:24.359
<v Speaker 1>to pocket the difference between the ten dollars that you

0:24:24.520 --> 0:24:27.800
<v Speaker 1>accepted for this sale and the one dollar that you

0:24:27.960 --> 0:24:33.080
<v Speaker 1>actually purchased everything for. So you make money by stock

0:24:33.119 --> 0:24:36.240
<v Speaker 1>going down. But if the stock price doesn't go down,

0:24:36.280 --> 0:24:38.960
<v Speaker 1>if it goes up, that's bad. News for you, because

0:24:39.320 --> 0:24:41.119
<v Speaker 1>now you're gonna have to pay out a pocket the

0:24:41.280 --> 0:24:44.520
<v Speaker 1>difference of that. So let's say that the stock actually

0:24:44.600 --> 0:24:47.080
<v Speaker 1>rose up to twenty dollars per share at the end

0:24:47.119 --> 0:24:49.200
<v Speaker 1>of the month, Well, then you're gonna have to pay

0:24:49.200 --> 0:24:53.280
<v Speaker 1>an extra ten dollars on every share of the stock

0:24:53.320 --> 0:24:56.399
<v Speaker 1>that you sold, So you're gonna lose that money instead

0:24:56.400 --> 0:25:01.560
<v Speaker 1>of gaining extra Well, these investors that ended up driving

0:25:01.640 --> 0:25:03.679
<v Speaker 1>up the price of game Stop were led by a

0:25:03.680 --> 0:25:07.280
<v Speaker 1>guy named Keith Gill, who's better known by his online handle,

0:25:07.280 --> 0:25:12.080
<v Speaker 1>which is Roaring Kitty, and they did a massive screw

0:25:12.200 --> 0:25:15.080
<v Speaker 1>you to major investment companies that are trying to short

0:25:15.119 --> 0:25:18.680
<v Speaker 1>sell game Stop. This is what we call a short squeeze.

0:25:19.040 --> 0:25:24.200
<v Speaker 1>This week, it happened again briefly because on Tuesday, game

0:25:24.240 --> 0:25:27.120
<v Speaker 1>Stop shares rose to a high of sixty four dollars

0:25:27.160 --> 0:25:30.400
<v Speaker 1>eighty three cents per share, and in fact, there were

0:25:30.480 --> 0:25:33.000
<v Speaker 1>companies that were putting on a short sale of game

0:25:33.080 --> 0:25:37.400
<v Speaker 1>Stop stock. However, in this case, the rally didn't last long.

0:25:37.480 --> 0:25:41.320
<v Speaker 1>It has subsequently dropped to around twenty seven dollars per share.

0:25:41.560 --> 0:25:44.880
<v Speaker 1>And this roller coaster followed some posts by the aforementioned

0:25:44.960 --> 0:25:47.199
<v Speaker 1>Roaring Kitty who seemed to be getting back into the

0:25:47.200 --> 0:25:50.520
<v Speaker 1>game after being quiet for a couple of years. But again,

0:25:50.680 --> 0:25:52.920
<v Speaker 1>unlike the first go round when this happened in twenty

0:25:53.000 --> 0:25:56.800
<v Speaker 1>twenty one, this particular boost appeared to just be a blip,

0:25:56.920 --> 0:25:59.680
<v Speaker 1>so we're not seeing a full repeat of the phenomenon.

0:26:00.119 --> 0:26:02.480
<v Speaker 1>So a lot of hedge funds have gotten wise to

0:26:02.560 --> 0:26:07.080
<v Speaker 1>this and have measures in place to limit their liability

0:26:07.160 --> 0:26:10.600
<v Speaker 1>so they're not caught out quite as badly as they

0:26:10.600 --> 0:26:15.639
<v Speaker 1>were the last time. Because boyotty, that was a doozy. Okay,

0:26:15.680 --> 0:26:19.000
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about Meta. They are ending the Workplace app

0:26:19.440 --> 0:26:22.440
<v Speaker 1>for external customers. At the very least, some elements of

0:26:22.480 --> 0:26:26.360
<v Speaker 1>Workplace may remain as internal Facebook systems. So Meta first

0:26:26.440 --> 0:26:31.280
<v Speaker 1>launched Workplace in twenty sixteen. It's a business collaboration tool. Essentially,

0:26:31.320 --> 0:26:35.560
<v Speaker 1>it lets companies make interconnecting page networks with their partners

0:26:35.720 --> 0:26:39.960
<v Speaker 1>and helps with collaborative projects that span different departments or

0:26:39.960 --> 0:26:43.159
<v Speaker 1>different companies entirely. They can have like dedicated message boards,

0:26:43.160 --> 0:26:45.560
<v Speaker 1>that kind of stuff. It's a business to business product.

0:26:46.119 --> 0:26:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Meta charged four dollars per user. That adds up pretty

0:26:49.560 --> 0:26:52.159
<v Speaker 1>quickly if you're talking about a really big company. But

0:26:52.280 --> 0:26:55.760
<v Speaker 1>now Meta is going to sunset the Workplace app and

0:26:55.840 --> 0:26:59.639
<v Speaker 1>shift assets to two other massive projects, which are AI

0:26:59.840 --> 0:27:03.520
<v Speaker 1>and of course the Metaverse. Because Meta is still determined

0:27:03.520 --> 0:27:05.840
<v Speaker 1>to make that happen. I think it's going to be

0:27:05.920 --> 0:27:09.200
<v Speaker 1>like Fetch. It's not gonna happen, but maybe it will.

0:27:09.480 --> 0:27:12.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, maybe people will love it. I still am skeptical,

0:27:12.040 --> 0:27:14.360
<v Speaker 1>but I'm also not a genius and I'm not an entrepreneur.

0:27:14.400 --> 0:27:16.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm just a grouchy guy who talks into a microphone.

0:27:16.960 --> 0:27:19.920
<v Speaker 1>The company says it will work with current Workplace customers

0:27:19.960 --> 0:27:22.679
<v Speaker 1>to transition them over to work Vivo, which is a

0:27:22.720 --> 0:27:25.919
<v Speaker 1>product from Zoom and the one partner they work with

0:27:26.359 --> 0:27:30.040
<v Speaker 1>that makes something similar that they actually recommend. Okay, here's

0:27:30.080 --> 0:27:35.119
<v Speaker 1>an interesting story about suppressing tech. Seven hundred and fifty

0:27:35.160 --> 0:27:38.560
<v Speaker 1>miles to the east of Australia is New Caledonia. In

0:27:38.600 --> 0:27:43.280
<v Speaker 1>the mid nineteenth century, France claimed New Caledonia and has

0:27:43.480 --> 0:27:46.960
<v Speaker 1>remained the ruler of New Caledonia since it is a

0:27:47.000 --> 0:27:50.720
<v Speaker 1>French territory. But recently the government of New Caledonia enacted

0:27:50.800 --> 0:27:55.760
<v Speaker 1>changes to election laws that really sparked protests across the territory,

0:27:56.960 --> 0:28:01.639
<v Speaker 1>mostly in indigenous populations that have been fighting for independence.

0:28:01.720 --> 0:28:05.560
<v Speaker 1>For quite some time, these protests grew and became more chaotic.

0:28:06.040 --> 0:28:11.639
<v Speaker 1>Four deaths have resulted as the protests have grown more violent,

0:28:12.000 --> 0:28:14.680
<v Speaker 1>and since then the government has cracked down on the populace.

0:28:14.840 --> 0:28:19.679
<v Speaker 1>The government has banned public protests and demonstrations and also

0:28:19.880 --> 0:28:23.640
<v Speaker 1>blocked access to TikTok all in an effort to squash

0:28:24.000 --> 0:28:28.000
<v Speaker 1>protests online and off. The government says that people were

0:28:28.080 --> 0:28:32.720
<v Speaker 1>using TikTok in order to organize demonstrations, and since demonstrations

0:28:32.800 --> 0:28:37.440
<v Speaker 1>are now banned, so is TikTok, so people can't use

0:28:37.480 --> 0:28:40.200
<v Speaker 1>it to do that. That's really why I'm including the

0:28:40.240 --> 0:28:42.800
<v Speaker 1>story here, because it's a social and political event that

0:28:42.880 --> 0:28:47.040
<v Speaker 1>has spilled into suppressing access to online platforms. And as

0:28:47.080 --> 0:28:49.040
<v Speaker 1>to the heart of the matter, like what this is

0:28:49.080 --> 0:28:52.640
<v Speaker 1>all about again, it's largely about the question of independence

0:28:52.640 --> 0:28:55.920
<v Speaker 1>for New Caledonia and the recent election laws that were

0:28:56.000 --> 0:29:00.120
<v Speaker 1>changed now allow people who are more recent transplants to

0:29:00.160 --> 0:29:04.120
<v Speaker 1>New Caledonia to vote. Previously, in order to be eligible

0:29:04.160 --> 0:29:08.280
<v Speaker 1>to vote in matters of great import in New Caledonia,

0:29:08.400 --> 0:29:11.800
<v Speaker 1>you had to have a long and deep connection to

0:29:12.360 --> 0:29:15.280
<v Speaker 1>the territory. You couldn't just move there and then influence

0:29:15.320 --> 0:29:18.760
<v Speaker 1>the vote so a lot of people who support independence

0:29:18.800 --> 0:29:23.360
<v Speaker 1>say this is a blatant attempt to dilute their influence

0:29:23.600 --> 0:29:26.840
<v Speaker 1>in public matters, because the people who are moving to

0:29:26.920 --> 0:29:30.880
<v Speaker 1>New Caledonia are largely French citizens, who are of course

0:29:31.040 --> 0:29:36.080
<v Speaker 1>not voting in favor of independence. So that's what's really

0:29:36.080 --> 0:29:38.520
<v Speaker 1>the heart of the conflict. But yeah, like I said,

0:29:38.560 --> 0:29:41.720
<v Speaker 1>it's spilled out now with a ban on TikTok. And

0:29:42.480 --> 0:29:46.000
<v Speaker 1>while there is a twelve day state of emergency currently

0:29:46.000 --> 0:29:48.760
<v Speaker 1>in effect for New Caledonia, it is not yet clear

0:29:49.360 --> 0:29:52.680
<v Speaker 1>if the ban on TikTok will lift once that state

0:29:52.720 --> 0:29:56.960
<v Speaker 1>of emergency expires. A lawsuit targeting Tesla alleging that the

0:29:56.960 --> 0:30:00.320
<v Speaker 1>company made false claims regarding full self driving capability these

0:30:00.400 --> 0:30:03.880
<v Speaker 1>in its car may move forward. Tesla had attempted to

0:30:03.880 --> 0:30:06.760
<v Speaker 1>get the case thrown out. A California resident by the

0:30:06.840 --> 0:30:10.720
<v Speaker 1>name of Thomas Lesavio alleges the company engaged in fraud

0:30:10.960 --> 0:30:14.480
<v Speaker 1>by claiming that its vehicles would have full self driving

0:30:14.520 --> 0:30:18.880
<v Speaker 1>capability and that's why Lasavio purchased a Tesla vehicle, only

0:30:18.920 --> 0:30:23.400
<v Speaker 1>to subsequently find out that those claims were perhaps exaggerated

0:30:23.720 --> 0:30:26.680
<v Speaker 1>or false. The judge overseeing the matter has decided that

0:30:26.680 --> 0:30:29.800
<v Speaker 1>at least some of Lasavio's case has merit and can

0:30:29.880 --> 0:30:32.880
<v Speaker 1>go to trial, but some other parts have been dismissed

0:30:32.920 --> 0:30:36.120
<v Speaker 1>because of the way they were presented. Now, Lasavio originally

0:30:36.160 --> 0:30:38.680
<v Speaker 1>was going to be part of a class action lawsuit,

0:30:39.040 --> 0:30:42.880
<v Speaker 1>but the other plaintiffs of that lawsuit had to drop

0:30:42.920 --> 0:30:46.600
<v Speaker 1>out because they had signed an agreement which would require

0:30:46.640 --> 0:30:49.640
<v Speaker 1>them to go through arbitration with Tesla before they could

0:30:49.680 --> 0:30:53.440
<v Speaker 1>bring a case to court. Losavio did not sign such

0:30:53.440 --> 0:30:56.400
<v Speaker 1>an agreement, so was able to move forward with his

0:30:56.480 --> 0:30:58.560
<v Speaker 1>own lawsuit, and he has opened it up to be

0:30:58.600 --> 0:31:02.040
<v Speaker 1>a class action so other Tesla owners can join if

0:31:02.080 --> 0:31:04.840
<v Speaker 1>they so wish. Now, Lasauvio is going to have until

0:31:04.880 --> 0:31:07.600
<v Speaker 1>June fifth to amend his complaint in order to get

0:31:07.760 --> 0:31:11.720
<v Speaker 1>parts that were dismissed reincorporated into it. Tesla has until

0:31:11.800 --> 0:31:14.840
<v Speaker 1>June nineteenth to respond. So there's still no guarantee that

0:31:14.880 --> 0:31:16.760
<v Speaker 1>this is actually going to go to trial, but it

0:31:16.880 --> 0:31:20.160
<v Speaker 1>is a step closer. Reuters has a piece titled the

0:31:20.240 --> 0:31:25.640
<v Speaker 1>inside story of Elon Musk's mass firings of Tesla's supercharger staff. Obviously,

0:31:25.680 --> 0:31:27.440
<v Speaker 1>this relates to a story I talked about. A couple

0:31:27.480 --> 0:31:29.480
<v Speaker 1>of weeks ago in which the company laid off a

0:31:29.560 --> 0:31:33.320
<v Speaker 1>five hundred person department responsible for the development and deployment

0:31:33.400 --> 0:31:36.960
<v Speaker 1>of supercharger stations, which seemed more than a little weird

0:31:37.000 --> 0:31:40.400
<v Speaker 1>because Tesla has made great strides in establishing its supercharger

0:31:40.440 --> 0:31:43.920
<v Speaker 1>technology as a kind of de facto industry standard. You know,

0:31:44.000 --> 0:31:47.520
<v Speaker 1>other car manufacturers have bought into that, and they've made

0:31:47.520 --> 0:31:50.880
<v Speaker 1>their own vehicles compatible with it. The Reuter's piece tells

0:31:50.960 --> 0:31:54.200
<v Speaker 1>a pretty disturbing tale in my opinion, because the former

0:31:54.280 --> 0:31:58.000
<v Speaker 1>head of the supercharger department, a woman named Rebecca to Nucci,

0:31:58.080 --> 0:32:01.040
<v Speaker 1>had already gone through a round layoffs like she had

0:32:01.040 --> 0:32:03.960
<v Speaker 1>already held layoffs within her division at the direction of

0:32:04.000 --> 0:32:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk, and Musk wanted to do more. But she

0:32:06.800 --> 0:32:10.080
<v Speaker 1>was meeting with Musk to present her vision that involved

0:32:10.080 --> 0:32:15.040
<v Speaker 1>the company expanding the supercharger network. Instead, Musk demanded more layoffs.

0:32:15.200 --> 0:32:17.920
<v Speaker 1>To Nucci reportedly said that if she were to lay

0:32:17.920 --> 0:32:20.760
<v Speaker 1>off anyone else in her department, that would be counterproductive,

0:32:20.760 --> 0:32:24.160
<v Speaker 1>it would hurt their business objectives. And that's when Musk

0:32:24.480 --> 0:32:27.400
<v Speaker 1>just went nuclear. He pulled the trigger and he fired

0:32:27.600 --> 0:32:31.360
<v Speaker 1>everyone or practically everyone in that department. And it's very

0:32:31.400 --> 0:32:34.320
<v Speaker 1>hard for me not to get the feeling that this

0:32:34.640 --> 0:32:37.320
<v Speaker 1>is a leader who, when he perceives a challenge to

0:32:37.440 --> 0:32:42.000
<v Speaker 1>his absolute authority, just goes with that nuclear option. And

0:32:42.040 --> 0:32:44.720
<v Speaker 1>now Tesla's having to deal with the consequences because people

0:32:44.760 --> 0:32:48.560
<v Speaker 1>from other departments, notably the Solar and battery divisions, have

0:32:48.680 --> 0:32:51.320
<v Speaker 1>been given the task to work with the various partners

0:32:51.360 --> 0:32:55.640
<v Speaker 1>and contractors who had been engaged in building out supercharging stations.

0:32:56.040 --> 0:32:58.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, these are folks who already had a lot

0:32:58.240 --> 0:33:00.400
<v Speaker 1>of work on their plate, and now they're to take

0:33:00.440 --> 0:33:03.440
<v Speaker 1>on the work of an entirely different department. It seems

0:33:03.480 --> 0:33:06.040
<v Speaker 1>like the general strategy right now for Tesla is to

0:33:06.120 --> 0:33:09.040
<v Speaker 1>stall for time, which isn't exactly welcome news if you

0:33:09.080 --> 0:33:11.480
<v Speaker 1>happen to be a contractor who's expecting to get paid.

0:33:11.960 --> 0:33:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Musk has said the plan is still to grow the

0:33:14.200 --> 0:33:17.160
<v Speaker 1>supercharger network, but that things are gonna have to happen

0:33:17.200 --> 0:33:20.040
<v Speaker 1>at a more methodical pace, which seems like that's a

0:33:20.080 --> 0:33:23.520
<v Speaker 1>given considering how many people were fired. There have also

0:33:23.520 --> 0:33:26.200
<v Speaker 1>been reports that Tesla has subsequently tried to hire back

0:33:26.240 --> 0:33:29.240
<v Speaker 1>at least some of the staff that were previously laid off.

0:33:29.360 --> 0:33:31.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure for some of those folks coming back is

0:33:31.320 --> 0:33:33.840
<v Speaker 1>a pretty hard decision. I mean, you do need to

0:33:33.880 --> 0:33:37.760
<v Speaker 1>make a living, so there is that element. But if

0:33:37.760 --> 0:33:42.600
<v Speaker 1>you've already been unceremoniously laid off for arguably irrational reasons,

0:33:42.800 --> 0:33:45.360
<v Speaker 1>it's not really great to think about coming back to

0:33:45.400 --> 0:33:47.920
<v Speaker 1>that company. It's also not a great development for electric

0:33:48.000 --> 0:33:50.640
<v Speaker 1>vehicles in general, because if Tesla fizzles out, then some

0:33:50.680 --> 0:33:53.800
<v Speaker 1>other entity or multiple entities will have to step forward

0:33:54.120 --> 0:33:57.440
<v Speaker 1>to provide the infrastructure necessary to support a migration from

0:33:57.480 --> 0:34:01.040
<v Speaker 1>internal combustion engine vehicles to evs. So that's one of

0:34:01.040 --> 0:34:05.200
<v Speaker 1>the big reasons why people say they're they're reluctant to

0:34:05.400 --> 0:34:10.000
<v Speaker 1>adopt evs is that they fear being stranded someplace because

0:34:10.000 --> 0:34:13.200
<v Speaker 1>they weren't able to find a charging station and recharge

0:34:13.200 --> 0:34:17.360
<v Speaker 1>at a reasonable limit and cost. So, yeah, this is

0:34:17.400 --> 0:34:20.319
<v Speaker 1>not great news for the EV industry as a whole. Now,

0:34:20.320 --> 0:34:22.920
<v Speaker 1>when he's not gutting his EV company, Elon Musk is

0:34:22.920 --> 0:34:26.680
<v Speaker 1>sparring with his old nemesis, the US Securities and Exchange Commission,

0:34:26.760 --> 0:34:29.880
<v Speaker 1>or SEC. He's had a few run ins with the SEC,

0:34:30.400 --> 0:34:33.799
<v Speaker 1>one stemming from his inability to not post stuff that

0:34:33.840 --> 0:34:36.880
<v Speaker 1>could be seen as market manipulation. When he intimated that

0:34:36.920 --> 0:34:40.480
<v Speaker 1>he was going to take Tesla private. Anyway, now the

0:34:40.560 --> 0:34:43.640
<v Speaker 1>SEC wants to chat with Musk about his purchase of Twitter,

0:34:43.760 --> 0:34:46.880
<v Speaker 1>of course, now known as X. The SEC did this

0:34:46.960 --> 0:34:50.480
<v Speaker 1>once before. Musk initially told him to pound sand and

0:34:50.520 --> 0:34:52.400
<v Speaker 1>that he wasn't going to listen to all their subpoenas

0:34:52.400 --> 0:34:54.600
<v Speaker 1>because they were just trying to bully him. After that,

0:34:54.760 --> 0:34:57.479
<v Speaker 1>some judges weighed in to say, no, no, no, that's

0:34:57.480 --> 0:35:00.200
<v Speaker 1>not how the law works, and Musk tried again get

0:35:00.200 --> 0:35:02.680
<v Speaker 1>the whole thing swept away because you know, it's such

0:35:02.719 --> 0:35:05.239
<v Speaker 1>a hassle to have to answer for your actions. It

0:35:05.280 --> 0:35:07.600
<v Speaker 1>turns out that's not a good enough reason for judges

0:35:07.640 --> 0:35:11.080
<v Speaker 1>to throw things out, even for billionaires. So it looks

0:35:11.120 --> 0:35:12.799
<v Speaker 1>like Musk is going to have to have a chat

0:35:12.840 --> 0:35:16.400
<v Speaker 1>with the SEC, which says that it came into possession

0:35:16.400 --> 0:35:19.279
<v Speaker 1>of new documents about the purchase of X and it

0:35:19.400 --> 0:35:22.760
<v Speaker 1>raises questions about Musk's involvement with Twitter in the months

0:35:22.840 --> 0:35:25.360
<v Speaker 1>leading up to his announced plans to acquire the company.

0:35:25.680 --> 0:35:29.279
<v Speaker 1>So we'll have to see where that goes. Considering the

0:35:29.520 --> 0:35:34.040
<v Speaker 1>decline of Twitter since Musk's announcement, this feels like it's

0:35:34.200 --> 0:35:38.040
<v Speaker 1>largely a lot of fuss over a rotting corpse. Honestly,

0:35:38.600 --> 0:35:40.880
<v Speaker 1>One story that I don't think I covered before is

0:35:40.920 --> 0:35:44.080
<v Speaker 1>that the first human recipient of a Neurlink implant, which

0:35:44.160 --> 0:35:48.080
<v Speaker 1>is the brain computer interface chip that's made by Neurlink,

0:35:48.120 --> 0:35:51.000
<v Speaker 1>another company owned by Elon Musk It has experienced some

0:35:51.160 --> 0:35:54.600
<v Speaker 1>issues as several of the very thin threads that connected

0:35:54.640 --> 0:35:57.920
<v Speaker 1>to the device have lost contact with the neurons that

0:35:57.960 --> 0:36:01.000
<v Speaker 1>they were previously attached to in this human subject, So

0:36:01.080 --> 0:36:03.680
<v Speaker 1>this affected the chip's ability to serve as a conduit

0:36:03.800 --> 0:36:07.279
<v Speaker 1>between the recipient's brain and the computer systems he was

0:36:07.800 --> 0:36:11.160
<v Speaker 1>interacting with. Engineers addressed the problem by making tweaks to

0:36:11.200 --> 0:36:14.400
<v Speaker 1>the algorithms that run along on the chip, and that

0:36:14.520 --> 0:36:18.360
<v Speaker 1>helped compensate for this issue. But now some unnamed sources

0:36:18.400 --> 0:36:21.440
<v Speaker 1>that are familiar with the testing say that this was

0:36:21.480 --> 0:36:25.799
<v Speaker 1>a known thing that the Neurlink had been observed to

0:36:25.880 --> 0:36:30.120
<v Speaker 1>have wires retracting in animal test subjects as well. Considering

0:36:30.160 --> 0:36:34.200
<v Speaker 1>the fact that this implant requires invasive and potentially dangerous surgery,

0:36:34.600 --> 0:36:37.760
<v Speaker 1>some are now questioning the ethical implications of moving forward

0:36:37.800 --> 0:36:41.520
<v Speaker 1>with a human test subject. While this retraction thing has

0:36:41.560 --> 0:36:44.480
<v Speaker 1>been a known issue, there's a concern that should more

0:36:44.520 --> 0:36:49.400
<v Speaker 1>wires retract, the neurolink will hit a wall with however

0:36:49.520 --> 0:36:52.040
<v Speaker 1>much adjustment you can do to the algorithms to deal

0:36:52.080 --> 0:36:55.319
<v Speaker 1>with it, and that in turn, that'll mean the chip

0:36:55.320 --> 0:37:00.600
<v Speaker 1>will gradually lose functionality and potentially become largely useless, which

0:37:00.680 --> 0:37:03.280
<v Speaker 1>could lead to an eividuality in which it becomes necessary

0:37:03.280 --> 0:37:06.640
<v Speaker 1>to remove the implant entirely. As for finding a way

0:37:06.640 --> 0:37:09.680
<v Speaker 1>to fix this problem in future procedures, that's pretty challenging.

0:37:09.719 --> 0:37:12.800
<v Speaker 1>You could create a system where you have more wires

0:37:12.880 --> 0:37:16.120
<v Speaker 1>or they're more firmly anchored, but that would mean they

0:37:16.120 --> 0:37:19.080
<v Speaker 1>would be harder to dislodge by definition, and if you

0:37:19.200 --> 0:37:21.640
<v Speaker 1>wanted to do something like an upgrade, or if you

0:37:21.680 --> 0:37:25.160
<v Speaker 1>needed to remove the implant, it could cause complications. So

0:37:25.280 --> 0:37:28.359
<v Speaker 1>this is not an easy fix one way or the other.

0:37:28.920 --> 0:37:32.960
<v Speaker 1>And in my mind, it's suggest to me that perhaps

0:37:33.000 --> 0:37:35.759
<v Speaker 1>this was a bit too aggressive for neuralink, but we

0:37:35.800 --> 0:37:38.200
<v Speaker 1>don't know that yet. Like it may turn out that

0:37:38.440 --> 0:37:41.919
<v Speaker 1>some wires retracting is just a normal course of action

0:37:42.040 --> 0:37:44.000
<v Speaker 1>and that the rest of it is fine. And there's

0:37:44.000 --> 0:37:49.240
<v Speaker 1>no denying that the technology does provide an incredible quality

0:37:49.239 --> 0:37:53.359
<v Speaker 1>of life boost to people who otherwise don't have use

0:37:53.400 --> 0:37:56.480
<v Speaker 1>of their limbs. That is something that is really important.

0:37:56.560 --> 0:38:00.759
<v Speaker 1>So if in fact we don't see further degradation of

0:38:00.880 --> 0:38:04.439
<v Speaker 1>the implant, I think that this issue, while it does

0:38:04.520 --> 0:38:07.319
<v Speaker 1>raise concerns and raises questions about why the FDA would

0:38:07.320 --> 0:38:10.120
<v Speaker 1>allow things to move forward, those are questions that I

0:38:10.160 --> 0:38:12.600
<v Speaker 1>think need to be answered. I think ultimately we could

0:38:12.640 --> 0:38:16.879
<v Speaker 1>say it's for the best if the device actually does

0:38:16.920 --> 0:38:19.160
<v Speaker 1>work and doesn't degrade to a point where it must

0:38:19.200 --> 0:38:22.640
<v Speaker 1>be removed. I mean, it's in arguably an improvement to

0:38:22.680 --> 0:38:25.000
<v Speaker 1>the life of the people who have it. Touching back

0:38:25.000 --> 0:38:27.360
<v Speaker 1>on AI for a moment, Sony Music Group has joined

0:38:27.360 --> 0:38:31.000
<v Speaker 1>countless artists, writers, and other creators and expressing concern over

0:38:31.040 --> 0:38:35.040
<v Speaker 1>AI using existing human created works as training material, and

0:38:35.120 --> 0:38:37.799
<v Speaker 1>Sony Music is saying, don't do that. We don't want

0:38:37.840 --> 0:38:40.200
<v Speaker 1>you to do that. So the company has reportedly sent

0:38:40.280 --> 0:38:43.919
<v Speaker 1>out several hundred letters to various AI startups and companies saying, hey,

0:38:44.000 --> 0:38:46.440
<v Speaker 1>don't you dare use our catalog of music without our

0:38:46.480 --> 0:38:49.759
<v Speaker 1>express permission, And at least for some of those recipients,

0:38:49.800 --> 0:38:51.600
<v Speaker 1>the company went on to say, you know, we know

0:38:51.719 --> 0:38:53.359
<v Speaker 1>that you're doing it now, so you've got to knock

0:38:53.400 --> 0:38:56.200
<v Speaker 1>it off Buster, except, of course, they worded it differently.

0:38:56.280 --> 0:39:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Sony specifically said, quote, due to the nature of your

0:39:00.640 --> 0:39:03.719
<v Speaker 1>operations and published information about your AI systems, we have

0:39:03.800 --> 0:39:06.799
<v Speaker 1>reason to believe that you and or your affiliates may

0:39:06.840 --> 0:39:12.000
<v Speaker 1>have already made unauthorized uses, including TDM, of SMG content,

0:39:12.280 --> 0:39:16.240
<v Speaker 1>in relation to the training, development, or commercialization of AI systems.

0:39:16.360 --> 0:39:19.719
<v Speaker 1>End quote. For the record, the initialism TDM stands for

0:39:19.920 --> 0:39:24.320
<v Speaker 1>Text and Data Mining. SMG is Sony Music Group. According

0:39:24.360 --> 0:39:28.040
<v Speaker 1>to jem Oswad of Variety, a recent EU law called

0:39:28.040 --> 0:39:31.440
<v Speaker 1>the AI Act prompted Sony to send these letters, as

0:39:31.480 --> 0:39:35.600
<v Speaker 1>the Act compels AI companies to reveal what their training

0:39:35.680 --> 0:39:38.160
<v Speaker 1>data was like where did they get their data to

0:39:38.200 --> 0:39:41.360
<v Speaker 1>train their AI models? So Sony, at least in part,

0:39:41.400 --> 0:39:45.960
<v Speaker 1>is saying, Hey, you used our information without our permission.

0:39:46.960 --> 0:39:50.720
<v Speaker 1>Don't do that now. I usually hold off on reading

0:39:50.760 --> 0:39:52.680
<v Speaker 1>recommendations to the very end of the episode, but I

0:39:52.719 --> 0:39:56.240
<v Speaker 1>want to mention Ashley Bellinger's incredible piece for Ours Technica

0:39:56.360 --> 0:40:00.440
<v Speaker 1>titled MIT Students stole twenty five million in second by

0:40:00.480 --> 0:40:05.760
<v Speaker 1>exploiting etch blockchain bug. DOJ says, now, as that title implies,

0:40:05.840 --> 0:40:07.440
<v Speaker 1>this is a heck of a story. It's about a

0:40:07.480 --> 0:40:10.720
<v Speaker 1>pair of brothers who learned how blockchains work at MIT.

0:40:11.360 --> 0:40:14.399
<v Speaker 1>They arguably learned a little too well how they work,

0:40:14.840 --> 0:40:17.560
<v Speaker 1>and they took this incredible education that they received at

0:40:17.680 --> 0:40:20.080
<v Speaker 1>MIT and they turned it into kind of an Ocean's

0:40:20.080 --> 0:40:23.920
<v Speaker 1>eleven style heist. Except this heist took less than fifteen seconds,

0:40:24.000 --> 0:40:27.279
<v Speaker 1>and it involved finding a way to access pending transactions

0:40:27.320 --> 0:40:30.160
<v Speaker 1>on the blockchain. So these were transactions that have not

0:40:30.280 --> 0:40:34.640
<v Speaker 1>yet actually been cemented in the Ethereum blockchain, and they

0:40:34.640 --> 0:40:38.360
<v Speaker 1>were able to divert cryptocurrency meant for these transactions to

0:40:38.400 --> 0:40:41.919
<v Speaker 1>go into their own accounts. So the way blockchains work

0:40:42.520 --> 0:40:46.200
<v Speaker 1>is that once a transaction gets added to a block

0:40:46.239 --> 0:40:49.280
<v Speaker 1>and the block is added onto the chain, it's secure

0:40:49.640 --> 0:40:52.640
<v Speaker 1>because going into the history of transactions and making a

0:40:52.719 --> 0:40:57.280
<v Speaker 1>change would cause a ripple effect for every block that follows,

0:40:57.800 --> 0:41:01.480
<v Speaker 1>and so any tampering immediately becomes clear and is reversed

0:41:01.840 --> 0:41:05.240
<v Speaker 1>because the entire network is able to see that someone

0:41:05.600 --> 0:41:08.640
<v Speaker 1>is messing around. The brothers, however, figured out how to

0:41:08.680 --> 0:41:12.040
<v Speaker 1>tap into transactions that had been initiated but not yet

0:41:12.080 --> 0:41:15.479
<v Speaker 1>assimilated into the blockchain, and they would have gotten away

0:41:15.480 --> 0:41:17.319
<v Speaker 1>with it too if it hadn't been for you know

0:41:17.560 --> 0:41:20.200
<v Speaker 1>the fact that their victims made a really big fuss

0:41:20.239 --> 0:41:23.640
<v Speaker 1>about this, and it prompted an investigation from the irs,

0:41:23.719 --> 0:41:28.200
<v Speaker 1>which then they said was incredibly easy to conduct because

0:41:28.200 --> 0:41:30.880
<v Speaker 1>the brothers were not particularly good at covering their tracks.

0:41:31.120 --> 0:41:33.520
<v Speaker 1>They tried to cover their tracks, but they didn't try

0:41:33.560 --> 0:41:36.320
<v Speaker 1>to cover their tracks in a smart way. Apparently the

0:41:36.360 --> 0:41:38.360
<v Speaker 1>brothers spent a lot of time searching for stuff that

0:41:38.480 --> 0:41:42.279
<v Speaker 1>was a little bit suss, like how to create shell companies,

0:41:42.520 --> 0:41:45.399
<v Speaker 1>how to launder money, and you know who's a good

0:41:45.400 --> 0:41:48.920
<v Speaker 1>crypto lawyer, which is all, I guess, arguably circumstantial, but

0:41:48.960 --> 0:41:51.280
<v Speaker 1>it's not a good look. As the kids used to say,

0:41:51.480 --> 0:41:53.600
<v Speaker 1>This is just a gentle reminder for all of y'all

0:41:53.600 --> 0:41:56.120
<v Speaker 1>out there. If you're going to commit a crime, and

0:41:56.160 --> 0:41:59.919
<v Speaker 1>I strongly urge you not to do so, maybe don't

0:42:00.239 --> 0:42:02.840
<v Speaker 1>search stuff while you're logged into a browser on a

0:42:02.840 --> 0:42:06.279
<v Speaker 1>personal device you know, or logged in at all to

0:42:06.400 --> 0:42:09.520
<v Speaker 1>a browser. You want as many layers of obfuscation between

0:42:09.520 --> 0:42:12.200
<v Speaker 1>what you're doing and you as you can manage, and

0:42:12.239 --> 0:42:14.799
<v Speaker 1>your browser history shouldn't be a treasure map that leads

0:42:14.800 --> 0:42:20.480
<v Speaker 1>authorities to your criminal behavior, because you just brought them there. Man. Now,

0:42:20.480 --> 0:42:24.000
<v Speaker 1>I just did some episodes about live service games this week,

0:42:24.040 --> 0:42:26.600
<v Speaker 1>and I mentioned the company rock Star in those shows.

0:42:26.760 --> 0:42:29.280
<v Speaker 1>Rockstar is the video game company behind the Grand Theft

0:42:29.320 --> 0:42:34.720
<v Speaker 1>Auto series. Jennifer Mos of Variety says that that Rockstar

0:42:34.840 --> 0:42:38.680
<v Speaker 1>had a two point nine billion dollar loss last quarter.

0:42:39.080 --> 0:42:42.200
<v Speaker 1>That is a heck of a princely sum to have

0:42:42.280 --> 0:42:45.680
<v Speaker 1>as a loss, and it's a here bit more money

0:42:45.719 --> 0:42:49.480
<v Speaker 1>than what was previously estimated because the original estimate shortfall

0:42:49.520 --> 0:42:51.840
<v Speaker 1>was going to be one hundred and seventy million dollars, So,

0:42:51.960 --> 0:42:56.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, just two point eight billion dollars off. Anyway,

0:42:56.400 --> 0:43:00.000
<v Speaker 1>about two billion of that was a quote unquote goodwill chart.

0:43:00.600 --> 0:43:02.920
<v Speaker 1>That seems like an oxymoron. It's kind of like the

0:43:03.040 --> 0:43:06.960
<v Speaker 1>convenience fees you see on services like Ticketmaster, and you're like,

0:43:07.000 --> 0:43:11.440
<v Speaker 1>who is this convenient for? But no goodwill charge just

0:43:11.480 --> 0:43:14.320
<v Speaker 1>refers to cases in which a company spends more money

0:43:14.680 --> 0:43:18.760
<v Speaker 1>acquiring some other entity than the value of that entity's

0:43:18.800 --> 0:43:22.160
<v Speaker 1>assets and whatnot. So it's like saying, this money represents

0:43:22.200 --> 0:43:24.640
<v Speaker 1>us paying more than what stuff was worth. But in

0:43:24.680 --> 0:43:27.479
<v Speaker 1>good news, gamers now know they can expect the long

0:43:27.520 --> 0:43:30.920
<v Speaker 1>awaited next game in the GTA franchise in the fall

0:43:31.040 --> 0:43:34.759
<v Speaker 1>of twenty twenty five. Okay, I got a couple of

0:43:34.800 --> 0:43:37.359
<v Speaker 1>recommended articles for y'all before I sign off. First up

0:43:37.400 --> 0:43:40.719
<v Speaker 1>is Jacob Stern's piece in The Atlantic. It's titled The

0:43:40.840 --> 0:43:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Dream of Streaming is Dead, and it goes into the

0:43:44.080 --> 0:43:47.680
<v Speaker 1>recent trend of bundling various streaming services together and how

0:43:47.719 --> 0:43:50.640
<v Speaker 1>this is essentially reverting to the older model of cable

0:43:50.680 --> 0:43:54.000
<v Speaker 1>television packages rather than the dream of freeing people from

0:43:54.040 --> 0:43:57.080
<v Speaker 1>that experience with the prospect of streaming. Next up is

0:43:57.120 --> 0:44:00.800
<v Speaker 1>Alex Heath's article in The Verge titled Goo and Open

0:44:00.840 --> 0:44:04.239
<v Speaker 1>AI are racing to rewire the Internet. It goes into

0:44:04.239 --> 0:44:07.880
<v Speaker 1>more detail about how the implementation of AI into search

0:44:08.000 --> 0:44:10.640
<v Speaker 1>can and will have a huge impact on the Web.

0:44:10.719 --> 0:44:13.120
<v Speaker 1>In particular, a lot of content sites out there are

0:44:13.120 --> 0:44:15.600
<v Speaker 1>wondering what the heck is going to happen because of

0:44:15.640 --> 0:44:18.960
<v Speaker 1>all that, So check those out. I hope you are

0:44:19.000 --> 0:44:22.680
<v Speaker 1>all well, and I'll talk to you again really soon.

0:44:28.920 --> 0:44:33.600
<v Speaker 1>Tech Stuff is an iHeartRadio production. For more podcasts from iHeartRadio,

0:44:33.920 --> 0:44:37.640
<v Speaker 1>visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen

0:44:37.640 --> 0:44:42.280
<v Speaker 1>to your favorite shows.