WEBVTT - How Did Roe v Wade Work?

0:00:01.800 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to brain Stuff, a production of iHeart Radio, Hey

0:00:07.000 --> 0:00:12.120
<v Speaker 1>brain Stuff Lauren vogebam here. The United States Supreme Court

0:00:12.240 --> 0:00:16.320
<v Speaker 1>recently overturned its N three decision in Roe v. Wade,

0:00:16.760 --> 0:00:20.680
<v Speaker 1>thus ending national rights to access some types of abortions.

0:00:21.560 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 1>This news has kicked off protests and calls to codify

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:29.479
<v Speaker 1>abortion access in law across the country. Today, let's look

0:00:29.480 --> 0:00:32.000
<v Speaker 1>at the case of Roe v. Wade, what it decided

0:00:32.200 --> 0:00:37.360
<v Speaker 1>and how it was overturned. Jane Rowe was a pseudonym

0:00:37.560 --> 0:00:41.440
<v Speaker 1>for Norma McCorvey, a pregnant single woman in Texas who

0:00:41.479 --> 0:00:44.560
<v Speaker 1>was unable to get an abortion because state law barred

0:00:44.560 --> 0:00:47.920
<v Speaker 1>abortion in most instances except when a woman's life was

0:00:47.960 --> 0:00:51.760
<v Speaker 1>at risk. McCorvey's life was not in danger, but she

0:00:52.040 --> 0:00:55.040
<v Speaker 1>also couldn't afford to travel outside of Texas to have

0:00:55.160 --> 0:00:59.400
<v Speaker 1>an abortion. She claimed that the Texas law violated her

0:00:59.440 --> 0:01:03.720
<v Speaker 1>constitutional right to privacy. The Wade in the case refers

0:01:03.760 --> 0:01:08.960
<v Speaker 1>to Henry Wade, a Dallas County District attorney. Rowe, who

0:01:08.959 --> 0:01:12.120
<v Speaker 1>remained anonymous throughout the lawsuit was joined by a Texas

0:01:12.200 --> 0:01:14.920
<v Speaker 1>physician who argued that the laws were too vague for

0:01:15.120 --> 0:01:18.520
<v Speaker 1>care providers to follow. Previously, he had been arrested for

0:01:18.640 --> 0:01:22.480
<v Speaker 1>violating the laws. The lawsuit argued that Rowe had a

0:01:22.600 --> 0:01:25.760
<v Speaker 1>right to obtain an abortion. A federal court in Texas

0:01:25.840 --> 0:01:29.520
<v Speaker 1>agreed with her, ruling that the Texas ban was unconstitutional,

0:01:30.920 --> 0:01:33.840
<v Speaker 1>but once the case reached the Supreme Court, the issues

0:01:33.880 --> 0:01:37.360
<v Speaker 1>involved seemed so complex that the court actually had both

0:01:37.400 --> 0:01:41.400
<v Speaker 1>sides present arguments twice, in December of nineteen seventy one

0:01:41.600 --> 0:01:45.760
<v Speaker 1>and again in October of nineteen seventy two. The Court

0:01:45.800 --> 0:01:49.840
<v Speaker 1>reviewed the case for two full years, weighing biological, ethical,

0:01:50.000 --> 0:01:55.600
<v Speaker 1>and religious arguments in addition to constitutional issues. Ultimately, the

0:01:55.720 --> 0:01:59.600
<v Speaker 1>justices ruled seven to two in favor of Row. All

0:01:59.600 --> 0:02:02.040
<v Speaker 1>the justice as were men. The first woman wouldn't be

0:02:02.040 --> 0:02:04.880
<v Speaker 1>appointed to the Supreme Court until Sandra Day O'Connor began

0:02:04.960 --> 0:02:09.920
<v Speaker 1>serving almost a decade later. In four Roe v. Wade,

0:02:10.080 --> 0:02:13.880
<v Speaker 1>Justice Harry Blackman wrote the majority opinion, which argued that

0:02:13.960 --> 0:02:17.919
<v Speaker 1>five of the constitutional amendments combined to create a zone

0:02:17.960 --> 0:02:22.480
<v Speaker 1>of privacy around certain personal decisions like marriage and contraception,

0:02:23.120 --> 0:02:26.799
<v Speaker 1>and that banning all abortions violated that right to make

0:02:26.880 --> 0:02:30.000
<v Speaker 1>a personal and private decision about whether or not to

0:02:30.040 --> 0:02:34.360
<v Speaker 1>have a child. Those amendments that he referenced were the

0:02:34.480 --> 0:02:38.720
<v Speaker 1>First Amendment, which guarantees personal freedoms, the fourth, which protects

0:02:38.720 --> 0:02:43.040
<v Speaker 1>citizens from unreasonable surge and seizure, the fifth, which guarantees

0:02:43.120 --> 0:02:45.720
<v Speaker 1>due process of the law before any citizen may be

0:02:45.800 --> 0:02:49.840
<v Speaker 1>deprived of life or liberty, the ninth, which specifically doesn't

0:02:49.880 --> 0:02:52.920
<v Speaker 1>limit a person's rights to what's in the Constitution, and

0:02:53.240 --> 0:02:57.560
<v Speaker 1>the fourteenth, which prevents individual states from infringing on American

0:02:57.600 --> 0:03:01.040
<v Speaker 1>citizens rights to due process and their stuff like equal

0:03:01.040 --> 0:03:06.760
<v Speaker 1>protection under the law. However, Blackman also wrote that the

0:03:06.880 --> 0:03:09.800
<v Speaker 1>right to privacy had to be balanced with the government's

0:03:09.840 --> 0:03:14.079
<v Speaker 1>interest in protecting potential human life, and to strike that balance,

0:03:14.280 --> 0:03:16.200
<v Speaker 1>the Court decided that it was up to a woman

0:03:16.200 --> 0:03:18.200
<v Speaker 1>and her doctor to choose whether or not to do

0:03:18.200 --> 0:03:22.920
<v Speaker 1>an abortion in the first trimester of pregnancy. This barred

0:03:23.000 --> 0:03:25.919
<v Speaker 1>states from provoking a woman's right to terminate a pregnancy

0:03:25.919 --> 0:03:30.280
<v Speaker 1>in the first trimester for any reason. In the second trimester,

0:03:30.720 --> 0:03:35.320
<v Speaker 1>states had the authority to regulate abortions. During the third trimester,

0:03:35.560 --> 0:03:38.640
<v Speaker 1>a once a fetus reached the point of viability, that is,

0:03:38.680 --> 0:03:41.800
<v Speaker 1>the ability to survive outside of the womb, the state

0:03:41.840 --> 0:03:45.240
<v Speaker 1>could restrict or ban abortion, except in instances where it

0:03:45.280 --> 0:03:50.440
<v Speaker 1>was necessary to protect a woman's life and health. Because

0:03:50.480 --> 0:03:53.680
<v Speaker 1>the case took years to decide. Before the verdict came down,

0:03:53.840 --> 0:03:56.840
<v Speaker 1>mccorby gave birth and put her child up for adoption.

0:03:57.880 --> 0:04:00.480
<v Speaker 1>She later changed her views on abortion and joined the

0:04:00.520 --> 0:04:05.120
<v Speaker 1>pro life side, though in a documentary released mccorby says

0:04:05.160 --> 0:04:08.280
<v Speaker 1>she only did so for the money. She died before

0:04:08.280 --> 0:04:13.440
<v Speaker 1>the documentary was released in but back to the court

0:04:14.400 --> 0:04:18.839
<v Speaker 1>in a second Supreme Court decision, a Planned Parenthood of

0:04:18.839 --> 0:04:23.560
<v Speaker 1>Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, narrowly upheld Row by a five

0:04:23.600 --> 0:04:27.760
<v Speaker 1>to four decision, but the court also scrapped the trimester

0:04:27.800 --> 0:04:31.960
<v Speaker 1>framework and found that legal restrictions on abortion were acceptable

0:04:32.240 --> 0:04:35.800
<v Speaker 1>as long as they didn't place an undue burden upon women.

0:04:38.320 --> 0:04:40.839
<v Speaker 1>Rowe remained the law of the land for nearly half

0:04:40.839 --> 0:04:44.200
<v Speaker 1>a century, but the balance of the Supreme Court began

0:04:44.240 --> 0:04:48.600
<v Speaker 1>to change when Senate Republicans blocked Democratic President Barack Obama's

0:04:48.640 --> 0:04:51.800
<v Speaker 1>nomination of Merrick Garland to the Court and held open

0:04:51.920 --> 0:04:56.080
<v Speaker 1>the seat, thus enabling Obama's successor, Republican Donald Trump, to

0:04:56.120 --> 0:05:00.760
<v Speaker 1>dominate Neil Gorrish for the seat. In republic Kins approved

0:05:00.839 --> 0:05:04.719
<v Speaker 1>to other Trump appointees, giving conservatives a six to three

0:05:04.760 --> 0:05:09.839
<v Speaker 1>control of the Court. Then, in early May of two,

0:05:10.080 --> 0:05:13.440
<v Speaker 1>a leaked draft of an opinion by Justice Samuel Alito

0:05:13.600 --> 0:05:16.880
<v Speaker 1>in a case called Dabbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization

0:05:17.400 --> 0:05:21.320
<v Speaker 1>indicated that this conservative majority was ready to overturn Roe

0:05:21.400 --> 0:05:26.120
<v Speaker 1>and Casey. This new case concerned Mississippi's ban on abortion

0:05:26.200 --> 0:05:29.280
<v Speaker 1>after fifteen weeks. Dabbs is the name of a state

0:05:29.320 --> 0:05:35.400
<v Speaker 1>health officer. Two months after the leaked draft, on June two,

0:05:35.720 --> 0:05:39.039
<v Speaker 1>the Court officially affirmed Mississippi's ban on abortion by a

0:05:39.120 --> 0:05:42.000
<v Speaker 1>six to three vote in the Dabbs case, and it

0:05:42.120 --> 0:05:48.040
<v Speaker 1>furthermore overturned Row by narrower five to four margin. Justice Alito,

0:05:48.279 --> 0:05:52.080
<v Speaker 1>writing on behalf of Justice's Gorge Clarence Thomas, Brett Covana

0:05:52.279 --> 0:05:55.560
<v Speaker 1>and Amy Coney Barrett, found that Rowe had been quote

0:05:55.680 --> 0:05:59.880
<v Speaker 1>egregiously wrong and deeply damaging, and that abortion was not

0:06:00.040 --> 0:06:04.000
<v Speaker 1>to right protected either explicitly or implicitly in the Constitution.

0:06:05.839 --> 0:06:09.280
<v Speaker 1>That due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, he wrote,

0:06:09.560 --> 0:06:12.440
<v Speaker 1>has been held to guarantee some rights that are not

0:06:12.520 --> 0:06:15.800
<v Speaker 1>mentioned in the Constitution, but any such right must be

0:06:15.960 --> 0:06:19.880
<v Speaker 1>deeply rooted in this nation's history and tradition. And implicit

0:06:19.960 --> 0:06:23.200
<v Speaker 1>in the concept of ordered liberty. The right to abortion

0:06:23.279 --> 0:06:29.000
<v Speaker 1>does not fall within this category. Whether that's historically correct

0:06:29.120 --> 0:06:31.359
<v Speaker 1>is a matter of research that's out of the scope

0:06:31.360 --> 0:06:34.640
<v Speaker 1>of this episode. Because our understanding of the human body

0:06:34.680 --> 0:06:37.320
<v Speaker 1>and reproduction has advanced so much in the past few

0:06:37.400 --> 0:06:41.560
<v Speaker 1>hundred years. We only started to understand how sperm and eggs,

0:06:41.560 --> 0:06:43.920
<v Speaker 1>and conception and the growth of a baby all work

0:06:44.279 --> 0:06:48.039
<v Speaker 1>when researchers first proposed cell theory in the late eighteen thirties,

0:06:48.360 --> 0:06:53.000
<v Speaker 1>a full fifty years after the Constitution was written. But

0:06:53.279 --> 0:06:56.600
<v Speaker 1>this ruling means that each state can set its own

0:06:56.640 --> 0:06:59.919
<v Speaker 1>abortion laws, and almost half the states in the Union

0:07:00.080 --> 0:07:03.640
<v Speaker 1>are likely to restrict or outlaw abortion under their current

0:07:03.680 --> 0:07:09.560
<v Speaker 1>elected officials. The end of Row has provoked a political firestorm,

0:07:09.600 --> 0:07:11.600
<v Speaker 1>but it could be just the start of an even

0:07:11.600 --> 0:07:16.440
<v Speaker 1>more bitter battle. Justice Thomas, in his concurring opinion, indicated

0:07:16.480 --> 0:07:18.920
<v Speaker 1>that the Court should use their reasoning from Dabbs to

0:07:19.000 --> 0:07:23.360
<v Speaker 1>re examine other precedents, including the right to access contraception

0:07:23.520 --> 0:07:27.360
<v Speaker 1>from Griswold v. Connecticut, the freedom to engage in consensual

0:07:27.400 --> 0:07:31.000
<v Speaker 1>sexual intimacy from Lawrence v. Texas, and the right to

0:07:31.040 --> 0:07:39.560
<v Speaker 1>same sex marriage from a Burghafel v. Hodges. Today's episode

0:07:39.600 --> 0:07:42.240
<v Speaker 1>is based on the articles you know these seven Supreme

0:07:42.280 --> 0:07:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Court cases by name, But what did they decide? Written

0:07:44.960 --> 0:07:49.160
<v Speaker 1>by Dave Rus and Thirteen Overturned Supreme Court Cases written

0:07:49.160 --> 0:07:52.640
<v Speaker 1>by Ed Grebanowski and Melanie red Seki McManus, both appearing

0:07:52.640 --> 0:07:55.160
<v Speaker 1>on House to works dot Com. The brain Stuff is

0:07:55.160 --> 0:07:57.520
<v Speaker 1>production by Heart Radio in partnership with how stuff works

0:07:57.520 --> 0:08:00.360
<v Speaker 1>dot Com and is produced by Tyler klang F. More

0:08:00.400 --> 0:08:03.040
<v Speaker 1>podcasts my Heart Radio, visit the I heart Radio app,

0:08:03.120 --> 0:08:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.

0:08:17.120 --> 0:08:17.160
<v Speaker 1>H