WEBVTT - NBA Weekend Winners & Losers | When Will Steph Pass Ray On NBA's All-Time 3PM List?

0:00:04.760 --> 0:00:05.400
<v Speaker 1>A luxury.

0:00:05.440 --> 0:00:10.280
<v Speaker 2>You can't live without a luxury. I can't live without coffee.

0:00:10.640 --> 0:00:11.400
<v Speaker 2>I really like it.

0:00:11.760 --> 0:00:12.320
<v Speaker 3>A luxury.

0:00:12.360 --> 0:00:13.280
<v Speaker 4>You can get it anywhere.

0:00:14.320 --> 0:00:16.400
<v Speaker 3>I guess yeah, I like good coffee.

0:00:16.800 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 5>I love coffee.

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:18.919
<v Speaker 2>I like my socks.

0:00:19.480 --> 0:00:23.239
<v Speaker 4>Socks. Your socks would you put in your shoes?

0:00:23.360 --> 0:00:24.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I really love them.

0:00:24.440 --> 0:00:26.800
<v Speaker 2>I like kind of like, you know, cozy feet.

0:00:27.600 --> 0:00:29.000
<v Speaker 4>You're attracting to yourself.

0:00:29.120 --> 0:00:31.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm attracted to really nice running socks, like I'm always

0:00:31.520 --> 0:00:34.800
<v Speaker 2>looking for good running. That's not a luxury, though. Coffee

0:00:34.840 --> 0:00:37.519
<v Speaker 2>and socks not a luxury. Give me a luxury. What

0:00:37.600 --> 0:00:42.200
<v Speaker 2>luxury should I have? Private plane? Larry, I'm on Ducktails.

0:00:50.840 --> 0:00:55.440
<v Speaker 2>Good Mornings, superld the Welcome to the Now Dunks podcast

0:00:55.560 --> 0:01:00.080
<v Speaker 2>on the Athletic Network. It's Monday, January twenty fifth. E

0:01:00.240 --> 0:01:03.160
<v Speaker 2>Skeets rolling this morning with mister what you need to Know,

0:01:03.240 --> 0:01:05.880
<v Speaker 2>tast Mellie. Hey everybody, Hey Tassy, we got the bass

0:01:05.920 --> 0:01:10.760
<v Speaker 2>Master ripping them lips. Trey Kirby, Hey, hey yo, the

0:01:10.800 --> 0:01:14.039
<v Speaker 2>international Man of Mystery taking it to the max, giggling

0:01:14.080 --> 0:01:15.960
<v Speaker 2>from that cold open Lee Ellis.

0:01:16.120 --> 0:01:19.000
<v Speaker 6>That was hilarious, wasn't it?

0:01:19.040 --> 0:01:22.759
<v Speaker 2>At last, but not least making the magic happen is JD. Hello,

0:01:23.280 --> 0:01:26.000
<v Speaker 2>there is and here we are before we get into it.

0:01:26.120 --> 0:01:29.800
<v Speaker 2>Sorry about the bills, they are tassy. It looked good

0:01:29.840 --> 0:01:31.319
<v Speaker 2>for I don't know, five minutes.

0:01:32.800 --> 0:01:35.880
<v Speaker 5>It's a better storyline Mahomes versus Brady, isn't it? The

0:01:36.040 --> 0:01:38.919
<v Speaker 5>next one versus the one that's supposed to be gone.

0:01:39.959 --> 0:01:41.080
<v Speaker 5>It's pretty incredible.

0:01:41.520 --> 0:01:44.520
<v Speaker 2>It's unreal. You saw the stat I'm sure going around

0:01:44.600 --> 0:01:49.960
<v Speaker 2>last night. No, No, Tom is in well now being

0:01:49.960 --> 0:01:53.160
<v Speaker 2>a have appeared in eighteen percent of all Super Bowls

0:01:53.880 --> 0:01:59.760
<v Speaker 2>because he's going to his stupid, stupid, ridiculous Bucks Cheese super.

0:02:00.200 --> 0:02:02.400
<v Speaker 5>Hope the Raptors get some tickets because it's down there

0:02:02.440 --> 0:02:04.400
<v Speaker 5>in Tampa where they're playing. That's all I care.

0:02:04.520 --> 0:02:05.840
<v Speaker 2>But well, I hadn't thought of it that. I think

0:02:05.840 --> 0:02:07.800
<v Speaker 2>they're doing a big thing with the healthcare workers if

0:02:07.840 --> 0:02:09.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm not mistaking, which is good, Which is good. They're

0:02:09.840 --> 0:02:11.840
<v Speaker 2>gonna allow them into the stadium. Anyway. Congrats to the

0:02:11.919 --> 0:02:13.720
<v Speaker 2>chiefs in the Bucks going to the Super Bowl. Are

0:02:13.720 --> 0:02:16.679
<v Speaker 2>they still doing the whole week off in between things? Trade?

0:02:16.720 --> 0:02:19.960
<v Speaker 5>You bet you? Oh man, I saw that, Sorry Trey

0:02:20.000 --> 0:02:21.720
<v Speaker 5>to take your thunder? What were you going to say?

0:02:21.760 --> 0:02:21.919
<v Speaker 3>Oh?

0:02:21.960 --> 0:02:24.200
<v Speaker 4>I had some hot takes ready about the Pro Bowl.

0:02:24.240 --> 0:02:27.200
<v Speaker 4>Tassie can't wait to see him stream it and simulate

0:02:27.240 --> 0:02:28.960
<v Speaker 4>it and Madden or whatever they're going to do. I

0:02:28.960 --> 0:02:31.280
<v Speaker 4>can't imagine they're flying to Hawaii and playing a game.

0:02:31.360 --> 0:02:34.720
<v Speaker 4>But uh, I don't know who's your third best cornerback

0:02:34.760 --> 0:02:38.960
<v Speaker 4>in the league this year? Is it Dontonio Wingfield Pro?

0:02:39.560 --> 0:02:41.680
<v Speaker 5>If I could name two, then I'd give you a

0:02:42.560 --> 0:02:42.960
<v Speaker 5>I can't.

0:02:43.800 --> 0:02:45.720
<v Speaker 2>All right, shout out to the stream team joining us

0:02:45.800 --> 0:02:48.000
<v Speaker 2>live right now on YouTube. Make sure you guys like

0:02:48.040 --> 0:02:50.400
<v Speaker 2>and your comment and you subscribe. Email us your questions

0:02:50.400 --> 0:02:53.960
<v Speaker 2>and comments for this week's new beach step in podcasts

0:02:54.400 --> 0:02:56.560
<v Speaker 2>No Dunks at the Athletic dot com. You can always

0:02:56.600 --> 0:02:58.320
<v Speaker 2>drop a question in the YouTube comments as well well.

0:02:58.360 --> 0:03:01.480
<v Speaker 2>Hit us up on Twitter at no dunks Think immaculate

0:03:01.600 --> 0:03:05.480
<v Speaker 2>items always available for sale at no dunks dot com.

0:03:05.520 --> 0:03:07.359
<v Speaker 2>Go get your T shirts and your hoodies and your

0:03:07.360 --> 0:03:08.880
<v Speaker 2>shorts and your mugs and all that. And finally, if

0:03:08.919 --> 0:03:10.919
<v Speaker 2>you haven't already grab an athletic subscription, go to the

0:03:10.960 --> 0:03:13.040
<v Speaker 2>Athletic dot com slash no dunks, but you can sign

0:03:13.120 --> 0:03:16.640
<v Speaker 2>up for just three ninety nine a month. Ley, I

0:03:16.680 --> 0:03:18.680
<v Speaker 2>know you like everything free in your life. But even

0:03:18.720 --> 0:03:20.799
<v Speaker 2>you would have to admit three ninety nine a month

0:03:20.840 --> 0:03:22.640
<v Speaker 2>for the best dance sports right in the world. It's

0:03:22.639 --> 0:03:23.320
<v Speaker 2>the hell of a deal.

0:03:23.760 --> 0:03:26.040
<v Speaker 3>How can you afford not to have a subscription at

0:03:26.040 --> 0:03:28.200
<v Speaker 3>three ninety nine a month. I mean, they're basically giving

0:03:28.240 --> 0:03:31.080
<v Speaker 3>it away, so go and get yourself one. They're great, great,

0:03:31.240 --> 0:03:32.799
<v Speaker 3>I will say. I will say this as well. What's

0:03:32.800 --> 0:03:35.160
<v Speaker 3>great about the Athletic is some of the writing if

0:03:35.160 --> 0:03:38.400
<v Speaker 3>you're into other sports like soccer or whatever, is great.

0:03:38.400 --> 0:03:40.560
<v Speaker 3>And there's a really really good couple of articles up

0:03:40.560 --> 0:03:42.840
<v Speaker 3>recently from our our friends on the other side of

0:03:42.880 --> 0:03:44.960
<v Speaker 3>the pond, as they'd like to say here about the

0:03:44.960 --> 0:03:47.160
<v Speaker 3>soccer world. Because I used to be a big soccer guy,

0:03:47.720 --> 0:03:49.000
<v Speaker 3>kind of left it for a while and now I'm

0:03:49.000 --> 0:03:51.680
<v Speaker 3>getting back into it. So that's what the Athletic does.

0:03:51.720 --> 0:03:53.240
<v Speaker 3>It gives you a little taste of everything.

0:03:53.520 --> 0:03:56.680
<v Speaker 2>Awesome. How's the cricket coverage on the Athletic.

0:03:57.480 --> 0:04:02.560
<v Speaker 3>Scars, I would say, Scars write some articles or.

0:04:02.560 --> 0:04:03.160
<v Speaker 5>Something like that.

0:04:03.280 --> 0:04:06.280
<v Speaker 3>I may have to do that. Yes, yes, so.

0:04:06.280 --> 0:04:09.720
<v Speaker 2>The Athletic it's awesome unless you're a cricket fan. For now.

0:04:10.000 --> 0:04:12.760
<v Speaker 2>For now, did you get.

0:04:12.600 --> 0:04:14.160
<v Speaker 3>In the graft that was going around the other day

0:04:14.160 --> 0:04:17.040
<v Speaker 3>about the most you know, sports with the biggest audience.

0:04:17.480 --> 0:04:18.000
<v Speaker 2>No, I didn't.

0:04:18.320 --> 0:04:20.560
<v Speaker 3>Soccer was obviously number one. Guess what was number two?

0:04:20.760 --> 0:04:23.160
<v Speaker 3>Tom Brady.

0:04:24.040 --> 0:04:24.440
<v Speaker 2>Cricket.

0:04:24.520 --> 0:04:28.039
<v Speaker 3>Cricket, Yeah, cricket. There's a market there. Maybe I should

0:04:28.040 --> 0:04:29.520
<v Speaker 3>get back into the cricket guy.

0:04:29.720 --> 0:04:30.679
<v Speaker 4>Get that music ready?

0:04:30.800 --> 0:04:34.279
<v Speaker 2>Oh you could, uh yeah, you could start like a

0:04:34.279 --> 0:04:41.360
<v Speaker 2>cricket show or article called hand Ice Lee Ellis cricket

0:04:43.560 --> 0:04:47.080
<v Speaker 2>cut the cricket story from Lee a couple of weeks ago,

0:04:47.160 --> 0:04:51.039
<v Speaker 2>probably who knows. Yeah, Okay, so Monday having some fun

0:04:51.040 --> 0:04:53.680
<v Speaker 2>already here we do NBA weekend winners and losers. Let's

0:04:53.680 --> 0:04:55.680
<v Speaker 2>start with the winners here on Monday task. Why do

0:04:55.760 --> 0:04:58.920
<v Speaker 2>you get it started? Who's your big NBA winner of

0:04:58.960 --> 0:04:59.400
<v Speaker 2>the weekend?

0:05:00.320 --> 0:05:03.000
<v Speaker 5>Well, it's Steph Curry because he almost has a record

0:05:03.040 --> 0:05:06.920
<v Speaker 5>that definitely belongs to him. Only Ray Allen now has

0:05:06.960 --> 0:05:09.400
<v Speaker 5>more threes made than Steph. Because it was a very

0:05:09.480 --> 0:05:13.239
<v Speaker 5>nice moment on Saturday night when he tied Reggie Miller

0:05:13.520 --> 0:05:15.520
<v Speaker 5>with his four to three and he threw up the

0:05:15.560 --> 0:05:18.640
<v Speaker 5>thirty one for Reg. Respect to Reg because he loved

0:05:18.680 --> 0:05:20.760
<v Speaker 5>him as a kid going up against Dell Hiss Dad

0:05:21.400 --> 0:05:25.720
<v Speaker 5>and it's fitting. The next one that he hit was

0:05:25.760 --> 0:05:29.160
<v Speaker 5>a very Reggie like three moving off the ball. It's

0:05:29.279 --> 0:05:32.440
<v Speaker 5>just trademark Steph. When he passed Reggie Miller, gave up

0:05:32.480 --> 0:05:34.520
<v Speaker 5>the ball to Draymond and then flew to the corner

0:05:34.920 --> 0:05:37.760
<v Speaker 5>and hit it and now has you know, just a

0:05:37.760 --> 0:05:40.200
<v Speaker 5>few more hundred to go, which which sounds like a

0:05:40.200 --> 0:05:42.440
<v Speaker 5>lot to catch up to Ray Allen, but for him,

0:05:42.440 --> 0:05:45.840
<v Speaker 5>it's absolutely nothing. And not only is he going to

0:05:45.920 --> 0:05:49.600
<v Speaker 5>catch ray Allen next season, but after he gets to

0:05:49.680 --> 0:05:52.240
<v Speaker 5>twenty nine to seventy three, he's only going to be

0:05:52.279 --> 0:05:54.200
<v Speaker 5>thirty three or he's going to be thirty four years

0:05:54.200 --> 0:05:56.440
<v Speaker 5>of age. So he can pad that number because that

0:05:57.000 --> 0:06:00.240
<v Speaker 5>record belongs to him and he should have to have

0:06:00.320 --> 0:06:04.080
<v Speaker 5>it by hundreds and hundreds and hundreds, and so this

0:06:04.160 --> 0:06:08.240
<v Speaker 5>is it's a nice time to celebrate Steph because you know,

0:06:08.360 --> 0:06:11.440
<v Speaker 5>he's just kind of he's kind of battered around the

0:06:11.480 --> 0:06:14.080
<v Speaker 5>Twitter sphere at times, right because he you know, he's

0:06:14.200 --> 0:06:17.359
<v Speaker 5>thrown into the hay. He didn't win, you know, only

0:06:17.400 --> 0:06:20.480
<v Speaker 5>one without KD and all that. So I just want

0:06:20.560 --> 0:06:23.520
<v Speaker 5>him to have this title that is most definitely his.

0:06:24.040 --> 0:06:26.599
<v Speaker 5>And I love this chart from Kirk Goldsberry that was

0:06:26.640 --> 0:06:30.880
<v Speaker 5>going around. That shows that Steph Curry, among all guys

0:06:30.880 --> 0:06:34.359
<v Speaker 5>who have hit one thousand three pointers, Steph Curry the

0:06:34.400 --> 0:06:38.279
<v Speaker 5>most efficient of all of them. So he's number two

0:06:38.279 --> 0:06:41.279
<v Speaker 5>in mad threes, but he's number one in efficiency, and

0:06:41.320 --> 0:06:44.320
<v Speaker 5>that's what makes him so special. He's going to be

0:06:44.440 --> 0:06:46.960
<v Speaker 5>the guy who gets you the most points per possession

0:06:47.279 --> 0:06:49.839
<v Speaker 5>in the history of the league at some point. So

0:06:51.160 --> 0:06:52.800
<v Speaker 5>you know, you see iverson way at the bottom, the

0:06:52.880 --> 0:06:55.360
<v Speaker 5>least efficient, and Stuff's going to be at the absolute

0:06:55.440 --> 0:06:59.240
<v Speaker 5>opposite end, which is crazy that he shoots a percentage

0:06:59.279 --> 0:07:03.760
<v Speaker 5>like Kyle but even better than Kyle Korver. So it's

0:07:04.200 --> 0:07:06.000
<v Speaker 5>you know, that's that's the numbers part of the game.

0:07:06.040 --> 0:07:08.440
<v Speaker 5>And that's why I think he isn't celebrated as much

0:07:09.160 --> 0:07:13.040
<v Speaker 5>as some of the dominant players in NBA history is

0:07:13.120 --> 0:07:15.360
<v Speaker 5>just because you know, it's it is a little bit

0:07:15.360 --> 0:07:18.120
<v Speaker 5>more about analytics and so it's a little less sexy.

0:07:18.840 --> 0:07:21.360
<v Speaker 5>But it was a nice moment to see him celebrate

0:07:21.480 --> 0:07:24.000
<v Speaker 5>reg And then after the game, Reggie joined the Zoom

0:07:24.040 --> 0:07:27.080
<v Speaker 5>call with his son Riker talked to staff a little

0:07:27.080 --> 0:07:29.600
<v Speaker 5>bit and uh, yeah, I learned a new name. I

0:07:29.600 --> 0:07:32.280
<v Speaker 5>didn't know that kids could be named Riker or I've

0:07:32.280 --> 0:07:33.960
<v Speaker 5>never I've just never heard the name. So that was

0:07:34.000 --> 0:07:35.480
<v Speaker 5>cool for me. That was great, and it was a

0:07:35.480 --> 0:07:36.000
<v Speaker 5>great moment.

0:07:36.240 --> 0:07:36.480
<v Speaker 7>Lee.

0:07:36.480 --> 0:07:39.520
<v Speaker 2>One of your like famous predictions, I would say, over

0:07:39.560 --> 0:07:41.680
<v Speaker 2>the course of this show, back when we were the starters,

0:07:41.800 --> 0:07:44.160
<v Speaker 2>grab me if I'm wrong, but you predicted that Curry

0:07:44.200 --> 0:07:47.000
<v Speaker 2>would be a guy to hit four hundred threes once

0:07:47.800 --> 0:07:49.600
<v Speaker 2>in a season. I remember we were like, there's no

0:07:49.680 --> 0:07:51.760
<v Speaker 2>way because it was talk like three hundred and stuff

0:07:51.760 --> 0:07:53.600
<v Speaker 2>like that. You're like, I think you do four hundred.

0:07:54.000 --> 0:07:56.760
<v Speaker 3>I was like, no, that's wrong. I actually predicted three

0:07:56.840 --> 0:07:58.640
<v Speaker 3>hundred because no one had even done three hundred.

0:07:58.760 --> 0:08:00.320
<v Speaker 2>Oh, okay, okay, And then he went and did.

0:08:00.280 --> 0:08:03.200
<v Speaker 3>Four hundred and he smashed that. He smashed it because

0:08:03.240 --> 0:08:04.960
<v Speaker 3>I think on the show I predicted three hundred and

0:08:05.000 --> 0:08:07.200
<v Speaker 3>fifteen and I think his record prior to that was

0:08:07.240 --> 0:08:09.880
<v Speaker 3>around two hundred and eighty five or something, and I

0:08:09.880 --> 0:08:11.280
<v Speaker 3>was like, he's going to break three hundred, He's going

0:08:11.320 --> 0:08:14.200
<v Speaker 3>to go three fifteen. And then after about five games

0:08:14.200 --> 0:08:15.880
<v Speaker 3>into the season, he was on track for about three

0:08:15.960 --> 0:08:17.760
<v Speaker 3>hundred and ninety or four hundred, and I thought, oh

0:08:17.800 --> 0:08:19.520
<v Speaker 3>my god, he's going to like blitz this. But you

0:08:19.600 --> 0:08:21.440
<v Speaker 3>just sort of felt he's going to come back to

0:08:21.440 --> 0:08:23.320
<v Speaker 3>Worth at some point. No one can smash a record

0:08:23.320 --> 0:08:24.880
<v Speaker 3>that no one's even made three hundred, no one's going

0:08:24.880 --> 0:08:26.760
<v Speaker 3>to make four hundred and one season, and he went

0:08:26.800 --> 0:08:28.840
<v Speaker 3>out and did that and did that pretty easily. He

0:08:28.880 --> 0:08:30.760
<v Speaker 3>also missed a couple of games to that season, but

0:08:30.800 --> 0:08:33.720
<v Speaker 3>he needed I believe he needed six on the last

0:08:33.800 --> 0:08:35.640
<v Speaker 3>night of the season against the Grizzlies, and he ended

0:08:35.720 --> 0:08:37.200
<v Speaker 3>up hitting eight. I think he had five in the

0:08:37.200 --> 0:08:39.960
<v Speaker 3>first half as well. So once he got to that point.

0:08:39.960 --> 0:08:41.600
<v Speaker 3>Of course, that was the seventy three and nine season.

0:08:41.600 --> 0:08:43.640
<v Speaker 3>That was Kobe's last regular season game, as well as

0:08:43.679 --> 0:08:46.040
<v Speaker 3>so much going on. But Steph went out there and

0:08:46.320 --> 0:08:49.719
<v Speaker 3>set a record that hasn't been broken yet, but it

0:08:49.760 --> 0:08:51.760
<v Speaker 3>will be broken one day. I think four hundred threes

0:08:51.800 --> 0:08:53.720
<v Speaker 3>in a season, it's just a matter of time before

0:08:53.720 --> 0:08:57.120
<v Speaker 3>someone comes along and does that. And you know, it

0:08:57.200 --> 0:08:59.760
<v Speaker 3>seems it seems like at the time that record is like, wow,

0:08:59.800 --> 0:09:02.160
<v Speaker 3>that's out of reach. But the way guys shoot threes

0:09:02.240 --> 0:09:04.760
<v Speaker 3>these days, I can see someone maybe hitting five or

0:09:04.760 --> 0:09:06.640
<v Speaker 3>six hundred in the season at some point down the track.

0:09:06.679 --> 0:09:09.280
<v Speaker 3>Made not for a few years, but guys just come

0:09:09.280 --> 0:09:12.600
<v Speaker 3>into league these days, just firing away. So that's what's

0:09:12.600 --> 0:09:13.040
<v Speaker 3>going to happen.

0:09:13.160 --> 0:09:14.679
<v Speaker 2>Well, the reason I brought it up is I wanted

0:09:14.720 --> 0:09:16.720
<v Speaker 2>you to tell us how many three is Steph Cree

0:09:16.760 --> 0:09:18.600
<v Speaker 2>will end his basketball career with.

0:09:18.880 --> 0:09:21.079
<v Speaker 3>Well, I'm glad you asked that's Steve as kids, because

0:09:21.280 --> 0:09:25.880
<v Speaker 3>I actually I've actually been I've actually done well, I've

0:09:25.920 --> 0:09:28.880
<v Speaker 3>done the projected how many threes I think he's going

0:09:28.920 --> 0:09:32.120
<v Speaker 3>to make from this point on? Roughly? Okay, I think

0:09:32.160 --> 0:09:34.760
<v Speaker 3>he's got seven seasons left in him where he's going

0:09:34.840 --> 0:09:37.920
<v Speaker 3>to be about thirty nine. I've roughed it, averaged it

0:09:37.920 --> 0:09:40.840
<v Speaker 3>out to be about seventy five games per seven seasons

0:09:40.880 --> 0:09:42.920
<v Speaker 3>at three and a half threes per game. So I

0:09:42.960 --> 0:09:46.880
<v Speaker 3>think he's got another eighteen hundred threese left in him. Wow,

0:09:47.000 --> 0:09:51.160
<v Speaker 3>starting now, eighteen hundred regular season threes. Yes, yes, So

0:09:52.760 --> 0:09:55.760
<v Speaker 3>I don't have the record here, but yeah, So he

0:09:55.880 --> 0:09:58.520
<v Speaker 3>just passed Ray Allen. He's just passed Reggie Miller. He's

0:09:58.559 --> 0:10:00.240
<v Speaker 3>got four hundred to get Ray Allen. So I think

0:10:00.280 --> 0:10:03.080
<v Speaker 3>he's going to be around fifteen hundred ahead of rayl

0:10:03.120 --> 0:10:05.560
<v Speaker 3>and about four and a half thousand threes when his

0:10:05.679 --> 0:10:06.520
<v Speaker 3>career is done.

0:10:06.640 --> 0:10:09.800
<v Speaker 2>Okay, calling it four thousand, five hundred and made threes.

0:10:09.960 --> 0:10:12.079
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think so, because I mean he's going to

0:10:12.120 --> 0:10:14.679
<v Speaker 3>become you know, guys like him become a better shooter

0:10:14.720 --> 0:10:16.920
<v Speaker 3>as they get older. But of course he's not going

0:10:17.000 --> 0:10:18.559
<v Speaker 3>to play as heavy minutes, but he's still going to

0:10:18.600 --> 0:10:20.440
<v Speaker 3>be able to hit those threes. So I think that's

0:10:20.480 --> 0:10:22.840
<v Speaker 3>a reasonable sort of target. He can make eighteen hundred,

0:10:23.840 --> 0:10:26.040
<v Speaker 3>you know, seventy five games a season for seven seasons.

0:10:26.040 --> 0:10:26.840
<v Speaker 3>I think that's him play.

0:10:27.200 --> 0:10:29.760
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, and then the question will be can anyone

0:10:29.840 --> 0:10:32.040
<v Speaker 2>catch him? Tray like, you know, can a Trey Young

0:10:32.160 --> 0:10:34.959
<v Speaker 2>moving forward, like, you know, fifteen years down the line,

0:10:35.800 --> 0:10:37.840
<v Speaker 2>you know, flirt with something like over four thousand mad

0:10:37.920 --> 0:10:39.520
<v Speaker 2>threes or something like that wherever Curry ends up.

0:10:39.600 --> 0:10:43.200
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, the question to me is not can somebody catch him?

0:10:43.240 --> 0:10:45.520
<v Speaker 4>How soon will somebody catch him? Because, like lie saying,

0:10:45.600 --> 0:10:49.040
<v Speaker 4>people come in chucking nowadays, it took Steph Curry a

0:10:49.080 --> 0:10:51.880
<v Speaker 4>few seasons before he was the fire thrower we know,

0:10:52.240 --> 0:10:54.160
<v Speaker 4>and who's ready to just pull up from half court.

0:10:54.320 --> 0:10:56.200
<v Speaker 4>You know, it took a while till anybody had the

0:10:56.200 --> 0:10:58.320
<v Speaker 4>confidence to do that. But now you see Trey Young

0:10:58.360 --> 0:11:01.480
<v Speaker 4>come in doing it. His rookie year. So yeah, I

0:11:01.480 --> 0:11:04.320
<v Speaker 4>think it'll happen eventually. It'll be basically ten years after

0:11:04.400 --> 0:11:06.600
<v Speaker 4>Ray or wait, I guess that seven years after Ray

0:11:06.600 --> 0:11:10.520
<v Speaker 4>Allen retired. He retired, like nine years after Reggie Miller retired.

0:11:10.840 --> 0:11:13.199
<v Speaker 4>In the next decade, will somebody pass Steph Curry? Will

0:11:13.200 --> 0:11:15.079
<v Speaker 4>we have to wait until his son makes it to

0:11:15.120 --> 0:11:17.400
<v Speaker 4>the NBA. And he's the greatest three point shooter of

0:11:17.400 --> 0:11:19.679
<v Speaker 4>all time. That's how it seems to go. Dell Curry

0:11:19.760 --> 0:11:21.720
<v Speaker 4>was one of the best of all time. Now Steph

0:11:21.800 --> 0:11:24.360
<v Speaker 4>Curry is the best of all time. What's the third

0:11:24.440 --> 0:11:27.920
<v Speaker 4>generation gonna be the third three point shooter? We're talking

0:11:27.960 --> 0:11:30.720
<v Speaker 4>about eight nine a game, like Li saying maybe five

0:11:30.760 --> 0:11:31.880
<v Speaker 4>hundred and six hundred a season.

0:11:32.440 --> 0:11:35.679
<v Speaker 2>Incredible, So congrats to Curry. Yeah, eclipsing Reggie Miller. That

0:11:35.880 --> 0:11:37.559
<v Speaker 2>was a cool moment. By the way, we should slip

0:11:37.559 --> 0:11:39.480
<v Speaker 2>in there. The Jazz won that game, right, Tassie and

0:11:39.679 --> 0:11:41.800
<v Speaker 2>continue to get their win streak up to eight. I know,

0:11:41.880 --> 0:11:43.600
<v Speaker 2>Jazz fans, come on, why we won the game? We

0:11:43.640 --> 0:11:45.400
<v Speaker 2>won the game? Yep, you won the game. You Tod

0:11:45.440 --> 0:11:47.680
<v Speaker 2>Jess continuing to play great basketball. We talked about them

0:11:47.760 --> 0:11:49.680
<v Speaker 2>at the end of last week and they were you know,

0:11:49.679 --> 0:11:51.720
<v Speaker 2>a little many of the mini winner of the weekend

0:11:51.720 --> 0:11:53.920
<v Speaker 2>for sure, them continuing to keep the streak going them

0:11:53.920 --> 0:11:56.199
<v Speaker 2>and the Clippers are on a nice winning streak right now. Okay,

0:11:56.200 --> 0:11:58.480
<v Speaker 2>so Curry, he gets one lee. Where are you going man?

0:11:59.080 --> 0:12:02.400
<v Speaker 3>Well skeeze, I'm going with your Raptors yesterday? Can one

0:12:02.520 --> 0:12:06.760
<v Speaker 3>single game make you a winner of the weekend? What

0:12:06.840 --> 0:12:09.120
<v Speaker 3>an incredible performance because the Raptors went into this one

0:12:09.160 --> 0:12:11.880
<v Speaker 3>shorthanded two of their starters not playing here, Pascal and

0:12:11.920 --> 0:12:15.640
<v Speaker 3>Kyle Lowry. So this was actually sort of in Nick

0:12:15.720 --> 0:12:17.800
<v Speaker 3>Nurse's playbook. Here he had to call on some of

0:12:17.800 --> 0:12:19.640
<v Speaker 3>the guys who don't play as many minutes to go

0:12:19.679 --> 0:12:21.720
<v Speaker 3>out there and play heavy minutes, and they pretty much

0:12:21.760 --> 0:12:24.440
<v Speaker 3>all delivered. I thought og Ananobi maybe had his best

0:12:24.480 --> 0:12:26.960
<v Speaker 3>game ever as a Raptor. He was fantastic on both

0:12:27.000 --> 0:12:29.960
<v Speaker 3>ends of floor, hitting three's, playing great defense, super efficient,

0:12:30.280 --> 0:12:32.400
<v Speaker 3>but when the game had to be won, it came

0:12:32.440 --> 0:12:35.920
<v Speaker 3>down to free throws and defense. Fred van Vliet especially,

0:12:36.000 --> 0:12:38.600
<v Speaker 3>his defense is stoped on Malcolm Brogden at the end there.

0:12:38.679 --> 0:12:41.079
<v Speaker 3>I've watched this over and over and over again, and

0:12:41.720 --> 0:12:44.160
<v Speaker 3>it looks like he gets his hand all over Brogden's

0:12:44.240 --> 0:12:46.600
<v Speaker 3>sort of arm hand wrist area, but nothing was called

0:12:46.600 --> 0:12:50.040
<v Speaker 3>and no one from the Pacers complained, so it's like

0:12:50.120 --> 0:12:52.240
<v Speaker 3>they were like, he didn't found me. That was just

0:12:52.320 --> 0:12:56.679
<v Speaker 3>incredible defense. And then on the next possession, the Raptors

0:12:56.720 --> 0:13:02.319
<v Speaker 3>defense inside Stanley Johnson and boucheting de Monte Sabonis at

0:13:02.320 --> 0:13:04.360
<v Speaker 3>the rim like he could not even get a shot off,

0:13:04.360 --> 0:13:06.080
<v Speaker 3>which was incredible. Well he got the shot off, of course,

0:13:06.120 --> 0:13:09.600
<v Speaker 3>but they contested it. Just incredible stuff. And the Raptors,

0:13:09.880 --> 0:13:11.960
<v Speaker 3>who have started to play a lot better basketball too

0:13:12.000 --> 0:13:14.840
<v Speaker 3>after their very slow start, got it together. But what

0:13:14.920 --> 0:13:17.240
<v Speaker 3>a great performance. Norm Power was very good yesterday fred

0:13:17.400 --> 0:13:19.520
<v Speaker 3>as I mentioned. I mean, he's been great for most

0:13:19.559 --> 0:13:23.520
<v Speaker 3>of this season, but OG's stepping up there and just

0:13:23.559 --> 0:13:26.120
<v Speaker 3>giving the Raptors a very very important win. They can

0:13:26.120 --> 0:13:28.200
<v Speaker 3>face the Paces again here tonight, but you know, when

0:13:28.240 --> 0:13:30.320
<v Speaker 3>you lose two starters and for a team that's desperate

0:13:30.320 --> 0:13:31.760
<v Speaker 3>for wins to go out and get that sort of

0:13:31.800 --> 0:13:34.000
<v Speaker 3>a victory against a team that's just very hard to

0:13:34.040 --> 0:13:36.319
<v Speaker 3>play against in the Indiana Paces, I thought was excellent,

0:13:36.440 --> 0:13:38.720
<v Speaker 3>and I just thought that was I think I think

0:13:38.760 --> 0:13:40.360
<v Speaker 3>a lot of the result for this was from Nick

0:13:40.440 --> 0:13:43.200
<v Speaker 3>Nurse's coaching record there with the Raptors isn't that he

0:13:43.280 --> 0:13:45.920
<v Speaker 3>does trust those guys even if they don't play heavy minutes.

0:13:45.920 --> 0:13:48.240
<v Speaker 3>DeAndre Bembery played the most minutes he's ever played as

0:13:48.240 --> 0:13:50.520
<v Speaker 3>a rapt yesterday, and he came out and delivered. You know,

0:13:50.520 --> 0:13:52.640
<v Speaker 3>he's not out there scoring and shooting the ball out

0:13:52.640 --> 0:13:55.320
<v Speaker 3>that much, but playing the right way and the offense

0:13:55.320 --> 0:13:57.840
<v Speaker 3>and setting up guys. And I think that just shows

0:13:57.840 --> 0:14:00.560
<v Speaker 3>that Nick Nurse, when you're on his team, it's like

0:14:00.920 --> 0:14:02.800
<v Speaker 3>you will get an opportunity. I don't know when, I

0:14:02.800 --> 0:14:04.839
<v Speaker 3>don't know how, but when you get that opportunity, I'm

0:14:04.840 --> 0:14:06.400
<v Speaker 3>going to put trust in you to go out there

0:14:06.400 --> 0:14:08.400
<v Speaker 3>and perform. And I thought that's what they did. So

0:14:08.480 --> 0:14:09.920
<v Speaker 3>I think this is a very good sign for the

0:14:09.960 --> 0:14:13.160
<v Speaker 3>Raptors that they are starting to get it together and

0:14:13.240 --> 0:14:15.360
<v Speaker 3>toughing out these wins. Earlier in the season, these were

0:14:15.360 --> 0:14:17.880
<v Speaker 3>the sort of games that they would lose, but instead

0:14:17.920 --> 0:14:20.160
<v Speaker 3>they're on the right side of the victory. Here. Great

0:14:20.200 --> 0:14:23.280
<v Speaker 3>great game, great performance, and really they closed down to

0:14:23.360 --> 0:14:25.520
<v Speaker 3>Mantess Bonus in that second half as well. I mean,

0:14:25.720 --> 0:14:28.080
<v Speaker 3>he had one of his worst offensive games of the season.

0:14:28.480 --> 0:14:30.480
<v Speaker 3>Just thought it was a great all round performance from

0:14:30.480 --> 0:14:31.000
<v Speaker 3>the Raptors.

0:14:31.160 --> 0:14:33.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Raps now five and one since starting two and

0:14:33.320 --> 0:14:36.480
<v Speaker 2>eight and tass you know on football Sunday there. This

0:14:36.600 --> 0:14:38.800
<v Speaker 2>was the rare like one o'clock start, so there was

0:14:38.840 --> 0:14:41.320
<v Speaker 2>nothing happening yet, none of the football games had started.

0:14:41.360 --> 0:14:42.880
<v Speaker 2>So maybe if some my balls were on this one

0:14:42.880 --> 0:14:45.680
<v Speaker 2>between two pretty good teams obviously, and like lisaid, Raps,

0:14:45.920 --> 0:14:47.720
<v Speaker 2>Raps pulled it out. How are you feeling as a

0:14:47.800 --> 0:14:51.840
<v Speaker 2>Raps fan, you know, with this team rebounding after a

0:14:51.880 --> 0:14:55.280
<v Speaker 2>brutal start as we talked about a couple of weeks ago.

0:14:55.200 --> 0:14:57.840
<v Speaker 5>Well, I feel good to have Nick Nurse in my

0:14:58.000 --> 0:15:01.160
<v Speaker 5>corner because what he did to my Sabonis there, just

0:15:01.200 --> 0:15:03.680
<v Speaker 5>taking him out of the game was the key to

0:15:03.720 --> 0:15:06.680
<v Speaker 5>this one. That's that's Nick Nurse's m o. You see

0:15:06.680 --> 0:15:09.120
<v Speaker 5>a star on the other side, make everybody else beat you.

0:15:09.360 --> 0:15:12.760
<v Speaker 5>And oj Anonobi he was the one and one a

0:15:12.960 --> 0:15:15.520
<v Speaker 5>defender on him, but they kept doubling Sabonis and Sabonis

0:15:15.560 --> 0:15:17.720
<v Speaker 5>just wasn't ready for all that. And so when he

0:15:17.760 --> 0:15:19.600
<v Speaker 5>was blocked twice at the end of the game, you

0:15:19.600 --> 0:15:22.640
<v Speaker 5>could see him shaking those beautiful locks, like what how

0:15:23.000 --> 0:15:26.560
<v Speaker 5>how did this happen. He was just he was, he

0:15:26.720 --> 0:15:29.280
<v Speaker 5>was He just couldn't believe the forty eight minutes that

0:15:29.320 --> 0:15:32.160
<v Speaker 5>preceded that. So Nurse really threw him off. They took

0:15:32.200 --> 0:15:37.000
<v Speaker 5>away Brogden's right hand, and they're just ready, Nick, Nurse

0:15:37.080 --> 0:15:39.440
<v Speaker 5>is ready. Yeah, and how he has everybody up and

0:15:39.480 --> 0:15:42.760
<v Speaker 5>down that roster. Yeah, they're feeling, they're feeling like they

0:15:42.760 --> 0:15:46.480
<v Speaker 5>can get to five hundred one day. And that's in

0:15:46.520 --> 0:15:50.040
<v Speaker 5>the Eastern Conference. There's a billion teams, you know, six

0:15:50.160 --> 0:15:53.360
<v Speaker 5>through thirteen. Well, I guess there's not a billion, but

0:15:54.200 --> 0:15:57.600
<v Speaker 5>you know there's there's there's eight teams right there, six

0:15:57.640 --> 0:16:01.920
<v Speaker 5>through thirteen that if anybody wants to make a move,

0:16:02.040 --> 0:16:04.280
<v Speaker 5>it's six and seven are right there for them. And

0:16:04.720 --> 0:16:07.760
<v Speaker 5>when the Heat get their guys back, you assume they're

0:16:07.760 --> 0:16:09.240
<v Speaker 5>going to make a move in the raps as well.

0:16:09.240 --> 0:16:11.960
<v Speaker 5>But og An andob uh It was a boss man.

0:16:12.160 --> 0:16:15.040
<v Speaker 5>He was a boss in that game. And it's it

0:16:15.120 --> 0:16:17.480
<v Speaker 5>was cool to see him take that number one roll

0:16:17.560 --> 0:16:20.320
<v Speaker 5>and roll with it for one night. And the rematch

0:16:20.360 --> 0:16:24.920
<v Speaker 5>tonight should be a blast between Nurse and protege Nate Bjorkrin.

0:16:25.280 --> 0:16:28.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. The Iowa Bowl, as some people were calling it,

0:16:28.160 --> 0:16:30.720
<v Speaker 2>is that where they last saw each other, I think,

0:16:30.840 --> 0:16:32.680
<v Speaker 2>or last coached against each other when they were me

0:16:32.760 --> 0:16:35.960
<v Speaker 2>and Iowa. Yeah, exactly. Yeah. The question for me with

0:16:36.000 --> 0:16:37.840
<v Speaker 2>the Raps is, like you said it there tasks and

0:16:37.880 --> 0:16:39.720
<v Speaker 2>I'll throw it at you, Trey, like, can the Raps

0:16:39.720 --> 0:16:42.440
<v Speaker 2>sort of like you know, that was a victory that

0:16:42.480 --> 0:16:44.800
<v Speaker 2>they won last night or yesterday I should say afternoon.

0:16:44.800 --> 0:16:47.200
<v Speaker 2>That was reminiscent of last year, right, that was sort

0:16:47.240 --> 0:16:48.760
<v Speaker 2>of like how the Raps won a lot of games

0:16:48.800 --> 0:16:50.920
<v Speaker 2>last year, I think, especially down their their star players

0:16:50.920 --> 0:16:53.600
<v Speaker 2>in Lowry and Siakam. But can they barge their way

0:16:53.640 --> 0:16:56.520
<v Speaker 2>into like the top of the east conversation, you know,

0:16:56.800 --> 0:16:59.320
<v Speaker 2>like the Sixers and the Bucks and the Celtics I

0:16:59.360 --> 0:17:01.080
<v Speaker 2>think are all there, the Nets are in the mix.

0:17:01.120 --> 0:17:03.680
<v Speaker 2>And then and then it's like the next tier of

0:17:03.720 --> 0:17:06.040
<v Speaker 2>your Pacers, Heat and Raptors. Can one of those three?

0:17:06.119 --> 0:17:09.320
<v Speaker 2>Can all of them who or none get into that

0:17:09.359 --> 0:17:10.760
<v Speaker 2>sort of upper etchelong conversation?

0:17:11.200 --> 0:17:13.760
<v Speaker 4>Well, unfortunately, I do think the Raptors are going to

0:17:13.800 --> 0:17:17.000
<v Speaker 4>make it into the top six, into the guaranteed playoff spots.

0:17:17.200 --> 0:17:19.520
<v Speaker 4>This seems to me to be the long con from

0:17:19.560 --> 0:17:22.160
<v Speaker 4>the Raptors, come out, struggle, make it look like you're

0:17:22.200 --> 0:17:24.240
<v Speaker 4>not the same championship team you used to be, and

0:17:24.280 --> 0:17:27.280
<v Speaker 4>then you got everybody sit in fat, feeling good, and

0:17:27.320 --> 0:17:29.320
<v Speaker 4>you're able to pull off victories like you'd were last

0:17:29.320 --> 0:17:31.439
<v Speaker 4>season when you were the can't say die Raptors. But

0:17:31.720 --> 0:17:33.160
<v Speaker 4>it's too bad they're going to get into the top

0:17:33.200 --> 0:17:36.520
<v Speaker 4>six because right now seven through ten goes Hawks, Nicks,

0:17:36.520 --> 0:17:39.280
<v Speaker 4>Bowls Raptors. That would be absolutely perfect for us in

0:17:39.320 --> 0:17:41.919
<v Speaker 4>the Eastern Conference play and tournament. The Raptors are just

0:17:41.960 --> 0:17:43.840
<v Speaker 4>too good. They had a bad couple of weeks to

0:17:43.880 --> 0:17:45.960
<v Speaker 4>start the season, and it happened to come at the

0:17:46.000 --> 0:17:48.119
<v Speaker 4>start of the season, which is when everybody's eyes are

0:17:48.119 --> 0:17:49.280
<v Speaker 4>going to be on them. If you have a bad

0:17:49.320 --> 0:17:51.200
<v Speaker 4>couple of weeks in the middle of March, it probably

0:17:51.200 --> 0:17:53.520
<v Speaker 4>slides under the radar. But the Raptors seem to have

0:17:53.520 --> 0:17:55.600
<v Speaker 4>found their footing down there in Florida and they're playing

0:17:55.640 --> 0:17:56.439
<v Speaker 4>some good basketball. Now.

0:17:56.640 --> 0:18:00.199
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, og Man, like he is a he's not going

0:18:00.240 --> 0:18:02.080
<v Speaker 2>to be in any sort of most improved conversation. I

0:18:02.080 --> 0:18:03.800
<v Speaker 2>don't think. I think, guys, we've talked about some of

0:18:03.800 --> 0:18:05.920
<v Speaker 2>the candidates or just sort of leaps and bounds ahead

0:18:05.920 --> 0:18:08.000
<v Speaker 2>of some of the other guys trailing them, but he'd

0:18:08.000 --> 0:18:10.760
<v Speaker 2>better be a Dan lock Lely for an all defensive nod,

0:18:10.880 --> 0:18:12.360
<v Speaker 2>Like he has to be on one of those two

0:18:12.359 --> 0:18:14.600
<v Speaker 2>teams because like he is given the best guy on

0:18:14.640 --> 0:18:17.040
<v Speaker 2>the other team. He's given that you know role, and

0:18:17.400 --> 0:18:19.280
<v Speaker 2>he's more times than nut shuts them down or at

0:18:19.320 --> 0:18:21.200
<v Speaker 2>least contains them. And then for him what he was

0:18:21.240 --> 0:18:24.639
<v Speaker 2>doing offensively, he does not have the tightest handle, I

0:18:24.640 --> 0:18:27.160
<v Speaker 2>would say Og, but man, it's getting a little better.

0:18:27.160 --> 0:18:29.440
<v Speaker 2>He's getting a little more confident and he's just barging

0:18:29.520 --> 0:18:32.240
<v Speaker 2>through guys like attacking, and then he's also hitting the

0:18:32.280 --> 0:18:34.280
<v Speaker 2>three pointer, which we know he can do for stretches.

0:18:34.320 --> 0:18:36.480
<v Speaker 2>So it's like, you know, you know, you hear Raps

0:18:36.520 --> 0:18:39.560
<v Speaker 2>fans going, hold on, is Og already the Raptor's best player?

0:18:39.640 --> 0:18:43.080
<v Speaker 2>Like is he going to eclipse here very shortly? Like

0:18:43.119 --> 0:18:45.600
<v Speaker 2>a siakam If you still believe that, you know, Lowry

0:18:45.680 --> 0:18:48.320
<v Speaker 2>is Lowryly he's the groat, the greatest Raptor of all time,

0:18:48.359 --> 0:18:50.159
<v Speaker 2>but you know he's obviously lost a little bit of

0:18:50.160 --> 0:18:53.679
<v Speaker 2>a step. I think you could start convincing me that

0:18:53.720 --> 0:18:56.080
<v Speaker 2>it wouldn't be long for Og to be the best

0:18:56.080 --> 0:18:58.080
<v Speaker 2>player on this team. Because what he does both ends.

0:18:58.080 --> 0:19:00.320
<v Speaker 3>I think, yeah, well, he got the big contract just

0:19:00.359 --> 0:19:03.399
<v Speaker 3>coming into the season, so certainly massage Jerry believes that

0:19:03.480 --> 0:19:05.639
<v Speaker 3>he has a big future here. But can we please

0:19:05.680 --> 0:19:07.480
<v Speaker 3>not talk all defense. I don't want to get into that.

0:19:07.560 --> 0:19:13.240
<v Speaker 2>After for you and your plus and all that, ye

0:19:13.560 --> 0:19:17.439
<v Speaker 2>forget of that debacle. I think you can play them

0:19:17.440 --> 0:19:18.399
<v Speaker 2>on one of these two teams.

0:19:18.760 --> 0:19:22.359
<v Speaker 3>Well yeah, yeah, I mean the second team. There are

0:19:22.400 --> 0:19:24.359
<v Speaker 3>sometimes players who bob up on that who no one

0:19:24.440 --> 0:19:27.320
<v Speaker 3>really expects. But look, he's out there and he's playing tough.

0:19:27.400 --> 0:19:29.280
<v Speaker 3>That's what I like about it is he plays tough

0:19:29.480 --> 0:19:31.920
<v Speaker 3>and then he hits those shots. And he has been

0:19:31.960 --> 0:19:33.920
<v Speaker 3>someone who rapped his fans have turned on from time

0:19:33.960 --> 0:19:35.760
<v Speaker 3>to time. So you know, he's playing great right now.

0:19:35.800 --> 0:19:37.800
<v Speaker 3>Everyone's in love with him. But we'll see what happens

0:19:37.840 --> 0:19:39.320
<v Speaker 3>if he hits another bit of a rough patch at

0:19:39.359 --> 0:19:42.359
<v Speaker 3>some point during the season, because he's someone who people

0:19:42.480 --> 0:19:44.639
<v Speaker 3>like to like to jump on pretty quickly when he

0:19:44.680 --> 0:19:45.760
<v Speaker 3>has a couple of bad games.

0:19:46.040 --> 0:19:49.000
<v Speaker 5>He's not a number one offensive player though, like that's key.

0:19:49.080 --> 0:19:51.240
<v Speaker 5>I think the worst part about the worst thing for

0:19:51.320 --> 0:19:53.560
<v Speaker 5>him is that Pascal Siakam plays beside him and they

0:19:53.600 --> 0:19:57.720
<v Speaker 5>just say whoa he can turn into Pascal Siakam offensively. Defensively,

0:19:57.760 --> 0:20:01.439
<v Speaker 5>obviously he's a bus But the a four year, seventy

0:20:01.480 --> 0:20:04.800
<v Speaker 5>two million dollar contract is his pennies on the dollar

0:20:04.840 --> 0:20:06.760
<v Speaker 5>because of what he does defensively and how he can

0:20:06.800 --> 0:20:11.160
<v Speaker 5>contribute offensively. And somebody would probably given him even more

0:20:11.200 --> 0:20:15.040
<v Speaker 5>than that this offseason, considering the free agency class and

0:20:15.040 --> 0:20:19.080
<v Speaker 5>how weak it is. But just because you see one game,

0:20:19.119 --> 0:20:20.640
<v Speaker 5>you can't just throw him into Hey, he's a number

0:20:20.680 --> 0:20:22.080
<v Speaker 5>one guy and he's gonna all start. I mean, he

0:20:22.080 --> 0:20:23.080
<v Speaker 5>hasn't even.

0:20:22.960 --> 0:20:25.280
<v Speaker 4>No, no, I'm not even scratched that maybe he's one

0:20:25.320 --> 0:20:26.160
<v Speaker 4>B A, two A.

0:20:27.720 --> 0:20:30.359
<v Speaker 2>He's I have way more confidence in an OG shot

0:20:30.400 --> 0:20:33.119
<v Speaker 2>though than I do a Sam shot from outside Buchan

0:20:33.480 --> 0:20:35.720
<v Speaker 2>and everything like. It's just, yeah, way more faith in

0:20:35.880 --> 0:20:37.840
<v Speaker 2>him being a little more consistent with that. But yeah,

0:20:38.160 --> 0:20:40.359
<v Speaker 2>it was his best game probably as a Raptors. As

0:20:40.440 --> 0:20:42.840
<v Speaker 2>Lee said, I'd probably agree with that on both ends.

0:20:43.280 --> 0:20:44.200
<v Speaker 2>Let's keep it going here.

0:20:45.000 --> 0:20:47.760
<v Speaker 4>What do you got, Trey, Well, the Fixers still look

0:20:47.880 --> 0:20:49.639
<v Speaker 4>like the best team in the Eastern Conference. They had

0:20:49.640 --> 0:20:52.880
<v Speaker 4>a great wakeound on Friday, they beat the Celtics. Embiid

0:20:53.000 --> 0:20:55.960
<v Speaker 4>had thirty eight and eleven, looking like an MVP again,

0:20:56.000 --> 0:20:58.680
<v Speaker 4>eleven points in the fourth quarter. But the big news

0:20:58.760 --> 0:21:00.720
<v Speaker 4>I thought from this one was the best Simmons had

0:21:00.760 --> 0:21:03.679
<v Speaker 4>a huge fourth quarter. He had eleven points and he

0:21:03.800 --> 0:21:06.119
<v Speaker 4>basically just took down, took over down the stretch against

0:21:06.119 --> 0:21:08.800
<v Speaker 4>the Celtics. You know, it's gonna be very interesting. I

0:21:08.800 --> 0:21:10.480
<v Speaker 4>think we should see these couple of teams in the

0:21:10.480 --> 0:21:13.080
<v Speaker 4>playoffs because they love beefing with each other. We got

0:21:13.080 --> 0:21:17.240
<v Speaker 4>Embiid versus Marcus Smart. Marcus Smart was flopping like crazy

0:21:17.320 --> 0:21:20.560
<v Speaker 4>in this game. Embiid versus Tys Tye was flopping like crazy.

0:21:20.560 --> 0:21:23.360
<v Speaker 4>Obviously they had the beef last week about who flops

0:21:23.359 --> 0:21:25.160
<v Speaker 4>the most. But that was a fun one. And then

0:21:25.200 --> 0:21:27.800
<v Speaker 4>on Saturday the Sixers kept it rolling. They beat the

0:21:27.800 --> 0:21:30.520
<v Speaker 4>Pistons thirty three and fourteen. For Embiid, he was making

0:21:30.800 --> 0:21:33.560
<v Speaker 4>big defensive plays. He had some huge rebounds. But again,

0:21:33.880 --> 0:21:35.840
<v Speaker 4>the story to me is that Ben Simmons had his

0:21:35.880 --> 0:21:38.520
<v Speaker 4>first twenty point game of the year twenty nine and seven.

0:21:38.560 --> 0:21:40.639
<v Speaker 4>For Ben Simmons, they just need him to be aggressive,

0:21:40.920 --> 0:21:43.680
<v Speaker 4>play downhill and get in the lane, because I mean,

0:21:43.720 --> 0:21:47.000
<v Speaker 4>he's scoring like twelve points a game. Everybody wants Ben

0:21:47.000 --> 0:21:48.760
<v Speaker 4>Simmons to be a shooter. That doesn't seem to be

0:21:48.840 --> 0:21:50.920
<v Speaker 4>the case right now, but he can still score more

0:21:50.920 --> 0:21:52.760
<v Speaker 4>than twelve points a game. He just needs to take shots.

0:21:52.760 --> 0:21:54.760
<v Speaker 4>He needs to be aggressive looking to score because if

0:21:54.760 --> 0:21:57.320
<v Speaker 4>he's collapsing the defense, if he's in the lane, he's

0:21:57.320 --> 0:21:59.480
<v Speaker 4>so tall that he's still got the kickout passes there.

0:21:59.520 --> 0:22:01.560
<v Speaker 4>But they need to go to the hoop and actually

0:22:01.600 --> 0:22:03.920
<v Speaker 4>try and get some layups here. He had a huge

0:22:04.000 --> 0:22:07.159
<v Speaker 4>drive to the hoop to get to get free throws

0:22:07.240 --> 0:22:10.720
<v Speaker 4>down the stretch against the Pistons. He's a special defensive

0:22:10.720 --> 0:22:14.000
<v Speaker 4>player already. It feels like Doc Rivers is getting everything

0:22:14.000 --> 0:22:16.440
<v Speaker 4>out of Embiid and Harris to start the season. Now,

0:22:16.520 --> 0:22:19.600
<v Speaker 4>if Ben Simmons is running rounding into form, the Sixers

0:22:19.600 --> 0:22:22.560
<v Speaker 4>are gonna look even scarier. It's tough to always believe

0:22:22.600 --> 0:22:24.639
<v Speaker 4>in the Sixers because they have these high highs, They

0:22:24.640 --> 0:22:26.960
<v Speaker 4>have these huge peaks, and it seems that most of

0:22:26.960 --> 0:22:29.000
<v Speaker 4>these are coming at home right now, which is also

0:22:29.040 --> 0:22:33.000
<v Speaker 4>a classics fixers thing to do. But it feels like

0:22:33.080 --> 0:22:35.400
<v Speaker 4>the vibes are better in Philadelphia. It feels like they're

0:22:35.400 --> 0:22:38.119
<v Speaker 4>confident and they're playing the right style of ball without

0:22:38.440 --> 0:22:40.520
<v Speaker 4>the constant question of should we break these guys up

0:22:40.560 --> 0:22:41.639
<v Speaker 4>over the top of their heads.

0:22:41.800 --> 0:22:44.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, especially like the timing of it all coming off

0:22:44.480 --> 0:22:47.639
<v Speaker 2>the heels of the Harden trade and them not getting hardened,

0:22:47.720 --> 0:22:50.119
<v Speaker 2>but Simmons' name being thrown around and like you kept

0:22:50.160 --> 0:22:52.120
<v Speaker 2>bringing it up, Lee, like ooh, that could be bad,

0:22:52.160 --> 0:22:54.080
<v Speaker 2>Like it'll be interesting to see how Simmons bounces back

0:22:54.119 --> 0:22:55.760
<v Speaker 2>from that, how the team deals with that, and like

0:22:56.200 --> 0:22:58.360
<v Speaker 2>they just continue to, you know, get these wins under

0:22:58.400 --> 0:23:00.920
<v Speaker 2>their belt. So that's that's fantastic, even if it means,

0:23:00.960 --> 0:23:03.040
<v Speaker 2>you know, you need Simmons to score twenty five and eight.

0:23:03.280 --> 0:23:05.119
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And he's gotten to the free throw line double

0:23:05.119 --> 0:23:07.359
<v Speaker 3>digits times two of the last three games, which I

0:23:07.359 --> 0:23:09.560
<v Speaker 3>think is important. He's making those free throws two, seven

0:23:09.600 --> 0:23:11.440
<v Speaker 3>to ten and then ten for twelve, So I think

0:23:11.440 --> 0:23:13.680
<v Speaker 3>that is Doc Rivers saying to him, like, yeah, don't worry,

0:23:13.720 --> 0:23:16.080
<v Speaker 3>we don't care if you're not shooting, but you have

0:23:16.160 --> 0:23:18.359
<v Speaker 3>to still be aggressive and get inside. Because once he

0:23:18.400 --> 0:23:20.679
<v Speaker 3>gets inside at six, nine, sixty ten, whatever he is,

0:23:21.359 --> 0:23:23.320
<v Speaker 3>there's not many guards who can really get up there

0:23:23.359 --> 0:23:24.760
<v Speaker 3>and can test the shot. So he just has to

0:23:24.760 --> 0:23:26.359
<v Speaker 3>take the ball strong and he's going to get the

0:23:26.400 --> 0:23:28.440
<v Speaker 3>free throw calls, and he's going to get to the line.

0:23:28.480 --> 0:23:29.639
<v Speaker 3>So I think that's what it is.

0:23:29.720 --> 0:23:31.080
<v Speaker 2>But overall, I.

0:23:31.040 --> 0:23:33.760
<v Speaker 3>Think his response to that trade has been good. I

0:23:33.800 --> 0:23:36.119
<v Speaker 3>think his attitude has been in the right place because

0:23:36.400 --> 0:23:38.639
<v Speaker 3>on the night where it looked like he was being traded,

0:23:38.640 --> 0:23:41.280
<v Speaker 3>apparently his agent was told he was being traded, he

0:23:41.359 --> 0:23:43.080
<v Speaker 3>had a bad game and it looked like it. But

0:23:43.119 --> 0:23:45.520
<v Speaker 3>then the trade happened and he wasn't included, and he

0:23:45.600 --> 0:23:47.399
<v Speaker 3>seemed to be able to get over that pretty quickly.

0:23:47.440 --> 0:23:50.359
<v Speaker 3>So I think that's very important for him, because again,

0:23:50.400 --> 0:23:53.680
<v Speaker 3>if he and Embiid reach their potential with all their

0:23:53.720 --> 0:23:57.119
<v Speaker 3>sort of surrounding players, their role players, the sky for

0:23:57.160 --> 0:23:59.680
<v Speaker 3>the Sixers really is I think conference finals. I think

0:23:59.680 --> 0:24:02.240
<v Speaker 3>that's in play. But when they can't play together, and

0:24:02.280 --> 0:24:04.960
<v Speaker 3>when they play at their worst, it's like first round

0:24:04.960 --> 0:24:06.879
<v Speaker 3>fodder like they were last season in the Bubble. I

0:24:06.880 --> 0:24:10.240
<v Speaker 3>know Simmons didn't play in that series, but they do

0:24:10.320 --> 0:24:13.640
<v Speaker 3>have quite a variance between their absolute best and their

0:24:13.640 --> 0:24:16.080
<v Speaker 3>absolute worst, and so much of it just comes down

0:24:16.440 --> 0:24:18.600
<v Speaker 3>to their two star players, which which is often the

0:24:18.600 --> 0:24:20.200
<v Speaker 3>case in the NBA. If you get the burst out

0:24:20.240 --> 0:24:22.360
<v Speaker 3>of those guys, then you can be great. But if

0:24:22.520 --> 0:24:24.879
<v Speaker 3>if one guy is not functioning or they can't work together,

0:24:25.320 --> 0:24:27.760
<v Speaker 3>then they don't really intimidate or scare any of those

0:24:27.760 --> 0:24:28.400
<v Speaker 3>other teams.

0:24:28.600 --> 0:24:30.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so good weekend for the Sixers. I'll keep it

0:24:30.520 --> 0:24:33.840
<v Speaker 2>rolling here. A winner of the weekend the Nuggets for

0:24:33.960 --> 0:24:37.040
<v Speaker 2>going back to back wins over the Suns. It was

0:24:37.040 --> 0:24:39.480
<v Speaker 2>the all beat ball series, both of them in overtime,

0:24:39.920 --> 0:24:41.800
<v Speaker 2>but they got it done. So on Friday, the Nuggets

0:24:41.920 --> 0:24:45.080
<v Speaker 2>rallied to force overtime before getting the one thirty to

0:24:45.119 --> 0:24:47.159
<v Speaker 2>one to twenty six win. Now, Yolkisch was a monster

0:24:47.240 --> 0:24:49.239
<v Speaker 2>again in this. You know, he is of course at

0:24:49.280 --> 0:24:51.520
<v Speaker 2>the top with embiid and a couple other guys of

0:24:51.560 --> 0:24:54.080
<v Speaker 2>the MVP leader board thirty one points, ten boards. Eat

0:24:54.080 --> 0:24:57.080
<v Speaker 2>assess Jamal Murray, though he hit a big shot like

0:24:57.119 --> 0:25:00.320
<v Speaker 2>thirteen foot jumper to put Denver up three ice the game,

0:25:00.359 --> 0:25:02.240
<v Speaker 2>there was like thirty seconds left and he had a

0:25:02.280 --> 0:25:04.680
<v Speaker 2>good game, you know, a decent game eighteen ninety seven,

0:25:04.720 --> 0:25:06.040
<v Speaker 2>you know, not a ton of points, not a ton

0:25:06.040 --> 0:25:08.760
<v Speaker 2>of scoring, but helping across the board there in the system.

0:25:08.800 --> 0:25:10.720
<v Speaker 2>Rebounds lost in the shuffle of that game too a

0:25:10.720 --> 0:25:12.840
<v Speaker 2>little bit. Michael Porter Junior returned for the first time

0:25:12.880 --> 0:25:15.240
<v Speaker 2>since late December after he missed ten games in the

0:25:15.280 --> 0:25:17.720
<v Speaker 2>league's COVID nineteen health and safety protocols. And you know,

0:25:17.800 --> 0:25:19.840
<v Speaker 2>he had seven points six boards in twenty minutes coming

0:25:19.880 --> 0:25:22.399
<v Speaker 2>off the bench in his first one. Nuggets followed that

0:25:22.480 --> 0:25:25.159
<v Speaker 2>up on Saturday against the Suns. Again, like I said,

0:25:25.480 --> 0:25:27.640
<v Speaker 2>in another overtime game. This one went to double overtime.

0:25:27.720 --> 0:25:30.800
<v Speaker 2>Jokich once again awesome, twenty nine points. He ate some

0:25:30.880 --> 0:25:33.199
<v Speaker 2>roast beef which we'll get to in a second, but

0:25:33.240 --> 0:25:35.600
<v Speaker 2>they got the eight point victory one twenty to one.

0:25:35.680 --> 0:25:39.000
<v Speaker 2>Twelve Sons were without Booker got hamstring issues, So I

0:25:39.000 --> 0:25:40.600
<v Speaker 2>could we could very easily just sort of give the

0:25:40.640 --> 0:25:42.520
<v Speaker 2>Suns a loser the weekend for losing back to back

0:25:42.520 --> 0:25:44.359
<v Speaker 2>against the Nuggets and then this injury to Booker. But

0:25:44.720 --> 0:25:47.160
<v Speaker 2>we'll keep it positive here with the Nuggets. Murray though

0:25:47.680 --> 0:25:50.119
<v Speaker 2>in this one, in this second game, I'm sure you

0:25:50.119 --> 0:25:54.679
<v Speaker 2>guys saw this, that difficult off balance three at the

0:25:54.760 --> 0:25:58.159
<v Speaker 2>end of regulation to force overtime. He ended with twenty

0:25:58.200 --> 0:26:02.240
<v Speaker 2>six points. Yeah, Trey is dropping the traveling call out there,

0:26:02.240 --> 0:26:04.679
<v Speaker 2>definitely probably got away with a walk, probably a foul

0:26:04.720 --> 0:26:06.399
<v Speaker 2>on the play. Though too, if we're being honest, So

0:26:06.440 --> 0:26:09.639
<v Speaker 2>maybe cancel each other out. But a very big shot,

0:26:10.320 --> 0:26:12.120
<v Speaker 2>moving the feet a little bit on the side, and

0:26:12.680 --> 0:26:13.800
<v Speaker 2>they got the victory in the end.

0:26:13.800 --> 0:26:14.160
<v Speaker 5>They roll.

0:26:14.200 --> 0:26:16.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean again, it's Jokic, it's Murray having a decent game,

0:26:16.600 --> 0:26:19.639
<v Speaker 2>hitting the huge shot, and Porter in this one fourteen points,

0:26:19.640 --> 0:26:23.359
<v Speaker 2>eleven boards. So here come the Nuggets, maybe tass you know,

0:26:23.440 --> 0:26:26.680
<v Speaker 2>they started slow, just like the Raptors, but getting the victories.

0:26:26.680 --> 0:26:26.840
<v Speaker 5>Now.

0:26:26.880 --> 0:26:29.679
<v Speaker 2>I think they're nine and seven overall, and Jokic has

0:26:29.680 --> 0:26:32.240
<v Speaker 2>been a rock the entire season. Murray's getting it going,

0:26:32.240 --> 0:26:33.880
<v Speaker 2>and they're just getting some of these other bodies back

0:26:33.880 --> 0:26:35.639
<v Speaker 2>where their bench is starting to look like, oh, that's

0:26:35.680 --> 0:26:36.680
<v Speaker 2>the Nuggets bench of old.

0:26:37.280 --> 0:26:40.280
<v Speaker 5>What a doubleheader this was that this weekend, those two

0:26:40.359 --> 0:26:45.320
<v Speaker 5>teams going back and forth. Unlike the Sixers and Celtics,

0:26:45.320 --> 0:26:47.760
<v Speaker 5>which was a lot of floppy beef, just flop after

0:26:47.840 --> 0:26:51.800
<v Speaker 5>flop after flop, these two teams it was just good

0:26:51.840 --> 0:26:54.480
<v Speaker 5>basketball going back and forth, and Jokic versus eight and

0:26:54.560 --> 0:26:57.320
<v Speaker 5>eight and was doing such a great job of taking

0:26:57.359 --> 0:27:00.320
<v Speaker 5>away Jokic's spots. Even though Yokic had a real good game,

0:27:00.320 --> 0:27:03.159
<v Speaker 5>because he's a friggin superstar. He's an MVP candidate. I

0:27:03.200 --> 0:27:06.000
<v Speaker 5>was really impressed with DeAndre Ayton and how they fought

0:27:06.080 --> 0:27:09.439
<v Speaker 5>on a second night without Devin Booker. That was that

0:27:09.520 --> 0:27:12.640
<v Speaker 5>was a blest And if that's any sort of indication

0:27:12.680 --> 0:27:14.600
<v Speaker 5>of what we're going to get in the postseason, I

0:27:14.640 --> 0:27:17.280
<v Speaker 5>can't wait because I would love to see the Suns.

0:27:17.600 --> 0:27:21.000
<v Speaker 5>I'm not so sure if I want to see Celtics

0:27:21.240 --> 0:27:24.479
<v Speaker 5>and Sixers. In terms of flop, oh, man, it's too

0:27:24.560 --> 0:27:28.040
<v Speaker 5>many flops. That's like flop per minute rate. That's a lot, man,

0:27:28.520 --> 0:27:32.600
<v Speaker 5>Like it's lower. It lowers, for sure, you know, but

0:27:32.680 --> 0:27:33.520
<v Speaker 5>you'd be on board.

0:27:33.800 --> 0:27:36.480
<v Speaker 2>You'd be on board with the Sun's Nuggets series like

0:27:36.520 --> 0:27:38.560
<v Speaker 2>a four five or three six or something like that.

0:27:38.600 --> 0:27:41.840
<v Speaker 5>Great stories, great stories throughout throughout the both those rosters.

0:27:42.040 --> 0:27:42.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it was.

0:27:42.600 --> 0:27:43.000
<v Speaker 5>It was good.

0:27:43.040 --> 0:27:44.800
<v Speaker 2>Anything to add, I mean, you thought it was a

0:27:44.800 --> 0:27:47.639
<v Speaker 2>travel trey. I actually think you're right there with Murray.

0:27:47.960 --> 0:27:49.879
<v Speaker 4>So did the last two minute report they said it

0:27:49.960 --> 0:27:52.119
<v Speaker 4>was a travel He did that. He did the smart

0:27:52.160 --> 0:27:54.679
<v Speaker 4>move though he took a shot from right underneath the

0:27:54.720 --> 0:27:56.880
<v Speaker 4>score bug. You couldn't really see what his feet were doing,

0:27:56.880 --> 0:27:58.800
<v Speaker 4>but he called the ball there. But if they don't

0:27:58.800 --> 0:28:00.760
<v Speaker 4>call it, it counts. That was a crazy shot with

0:28:00.960 --> 0:28:03.520
<v Speaker 4>zero reaction because there was nobody there, But I was like,

0:28:03.520 --> 0:28:06.800
<v Speaker 4>oh wow, that went in. Incredible stuff. But the Nuggets

0:28:06.840 --> 0:28:09.000
<v Speaker 4>are looking good, and I think that Yokic would be

0:28:09.000 --> 0:28:11.560
<v Speaker 4>even higher in the MVP conversation if we were seeing

0:28:11.560 --> 0:28:14.639
<v Speaker 4>these kind of performances from Jamal Murray all season, because

0:28:14.680 --> 0:28:17.280
<v Speaker 4>the Nuggets have been very close in winning the games

0:28:17.280 --> 0:28:19.560
<v Speaker 4>that they lost. They're nine and seven. The defense has

0:28:19.600 --> 0:28:22.040
<v Speaker 4>not been very good at all, but Jokic has been

0:28:22.080 --> 0:28:24.160
<v Speaker 4>straight up ball, and if he had the secondary guy

0:28:24.200 --> 0:28:26.360
<v Speaker 4>there every single night, they're probably a little bit better

0:28:26.359 --> 0:28:28.080
<v Speaker 4>than nine and seven. Good to see Murray get going.

0:28:28.119 --> 0:28:30.600
<v Speaker 4>He looked like he was in total control of this game.

0:28:30.640 --> 0:28:33.040
<v Speaker 4>So yeah, I'm with Tassi. Sign me up for Nuggets

0:28:33.119 --> 0:28:35.400
<v Speaker 4>Versuns because I think their first game was the one

0:28:35.400 --> 0:28:38.280
<v Speaker 4>where Chris Paul hit that really big baseline jumper and

0:28:38.280 --> 0:28:40.080
<v Speaker 4>then one of his teammates stepped on his shoe, So

0:28:40.120 --> 0:28:43.640
<v Speaker 4>they've played three classics already. Would be fun in the playoffs,

0:28:43.640 --> 0:28:45.440
<v Speaker 4>no doubt about it. But of course, for me, the

0:28:45.440 --> 0:28:48.080
<v Speaker 4>biggest news out of this one twenty two rebounds from

0:28:48.160 --> 0:28:50.280
<v Speaker 4>Nikolea Jokic, So you know, we got to.

0:28:50.240 --> 0:29:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Do it to him, skeets.

0:29:04.560 --> 0:29:07.960
<v Speaker 7>Nikola Jokic grabbed twenty two rebounds. That's a lot of

0:29:08.040 --> 0:29:40.360
<v Speaker 7>roast beef. He's on Denver. That's mile hide, no duks.

0:29:40.800 --> 0:29:45.640
<v Speaker 7>We love roast beef, which is rebounds.

0:29:46.480 --> 0:29:50.240
<v Speaker 2>When you see it cut together like that, you really

0:29:50.400 --> 0:29:53.360
<v Speaker 2>realize that Jokic never grabs a rebound with two hands.

0:29:53.560 --> 0:29:57.200
<v Speaker 4>Oh my good, this is hilarious to watch this guy rebounding,

0:29:57.720 --> 0:30:00.320
<v Speaker 4>never grabs a rebound with two hands. Barely he jumps

0:30:00.360 --> 0:30:01.800
<v Speaker 4>off the court. Look at how many of those are

0:30:01.840 --> 0:30:05.640
<v Speaker 4>just him worming his way around DeAndre Ayton wearing an

0:30:05.720 --> 0:30:08.920
<v Speaker 4>ironic number twenty two. Just a little tiny tip that

0:30:09.000 --> 0:30:10.840
<v Speaker 4>one rebound right off the top where he grabs it

0:30:10.840 --> 0:30:12.800
<v Speaker 4>with one hand. It just chucks it down the court.

0:30:13.160 --> 0:30:16.000
<v Speaker 4>They didn't score on it, but he's throwing the outlet pass. Anyways,

0:30:16.280 --> 0:30:19.040
<v Speaker 4>This was a lot different than watching Clint Capella's sloppy

0:30:19.080 --> 0:30:22.360
<v Speaker 4>beef was. This was an interesting beef to watch, but

0:30:22.400 --> 0:30:25.480
<v Speaker 4>the beef watch continues. That's our fifth twenty rebound game

0:30:25.560 --> 0:30:28.400
<v Speaker 4>so far the season. Two for Drummond, one now for

0:30:28.480 --> 0:30:32.240
<v Speaker 4>sabonas Clint Cappella and Nicola Jokic. Cappella he got pretty

0:30:32.520 --> 0:30:35.240
<v Speaker 4>close over the weekend. Nineteen rebounds is looking like back

0:30:35.280 --> 0:30:37.400
<v Speaker 4>to back beef. But this is how you inspire people.

0:30:37.800 --> 0:30:40.680
<v Speaker 4>Big Beef exists for one week and now we got

0:30:40.680 --> 0:30:42.719
<v Speaker 4>five twenty rebound games. You don't need to go out

0:30:42.760 --> 0:30:44.880
<v Speaker 4>there and trash people. You gotta lift them up. Say

0:30:44.920 --> 0:30:46.680
<v Speaker 4>we want to see those rebounds.

0:30:46.800 --> 0:30:49.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I saw someone on Twitter saying that what's going

0:30:49.200 --> 0:30:51.600
<v Speaker 2>on with all these twenty rebound games? Is it because

0:30:51.600 --> 0:30:53.840
<v Speaker 2>of the Big Beef? I think so everybody wants that

0:30:53.960 --> 0:30:54.600
<v Speaker 2>roast beef.

0:30:54.920 --> 0:30:57.480
<v Speaker 3>What would you call it if Cappella gets the triple

0:30:57.520 --> 0:30:59.200
<v Speaker 3>double with the roast beef because he had the ten

0:30:59.280 --> 0:31:02.720
<v Speaker 3>blocks too, and he had it.

0:31:02.720 --> 0:31:04.920
<v Speaker 2>Oh you're saying, what happens with the triple double and

0:31:05.280 --> 0:31:06.320
<v Speaker 2>roast beef? Exactly?

0:31:06.480 --> 0:31:08.280
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, beef in Swiss. I don't know.

0:31:08.960 --> 0:31:13.720
<v Speaker 5>Triple decker, I think, yeah, yeah, why not? I think

0:31:13.720 --> 0:31:15.720
<v Speaker 5>that's when Nicole Joki is doing with that other hand.

0:31:15.760 --> 0:31:17.880
<v Speaker 5>When he's rebounding with one hand, he's got a roast

0:31:17.920 --> 0:31:20.520
<v Speaker 5>beef sandwich in the other that he's killing.

0:31:20.800 --> 0:31:23.520
<v Speaker 2>It's incredible watching those, though. It really is like you

0:31:23.520 --> 0:31:25.520
<v Speaker 2>don't notice as much when you just see one at

0:31:25.560 --> 0:31:27.520
<v Speaker 2>a time. For some reason, you cut them all together.

0:31:27.560 --> 0:31:29.960
<v Speaker 2>It's like he never ever grabs it with two hands.

0:31:29.960 --> 0:31:30.560
<v Speaker 2>It's always one.

0:31:30.880 --> 0:31:32.680
<v Speaker 5>And that music just guessed me. Hype was that the

0:31:32.680 --> 0:31:36.240
<v Speaker 5>whittler on the ones and twos dropping those beats. That

0:31:36.400 --> 0:31:36.959
<v Speaker 5>was nice.

0:31:37.120 --> 0:31:39.200
<v Speaker 2>Well, let's stick with the nuggets because a couple other

0:31:39.240 --> 0:31:41.120
<v Speaker 2>things here, Jamal Murray back to him. You know, he

0:31:41.120 --> 0:31:43.240
<v Speaker 2>had all those big shots the ice the first game,

0:31:43.280 --> 0:31:45.720
<v Speaker 2>and then he hit the game tying three, which you

0:31:45.760 --> 0:31:47.760
<v Speaker 2>got away with the travel, but he hit the shot anyway.

0:31:48.040 --> 0:31:51.680
<v Speaker 2>He also gave us one of three new wedgies from

0:31:51.720 --> 0:31:54.800
<v Speaker 2>the weekend guys. So on Friday it was Jamal Murray

0:31:54.880 --> 0:31:56.840
<v Speaker 2>Kitchener's finess. Of course, I should have said that earlier.

0:31:57.320 --> 0:32:01.040
<v Speaker 2>Stuck it from the wing a spot, classic spot for

0:32:01.120 --> 0:32:03.640
<v Speaker 2>a ggie, really deep weggie. I'd say that one's really

0:32:03.640 --> 0:32:07.360
<v Speaker 2>in there, so that's nice. Then on Sunday, Lonnie Walker

0:32:07.400 --> 0:32:11.960
<v Speaker 2>the fourth from the exact same spot, basically another leggie.

0:32:12.160 --> 0:32:15.120
<v Speaker 2>Weg you number twelve if you're keeping track here, Marie

0:32:15.240 --> 0:32:19.479
<v Speaker 2>was eleven Walker twelve, and then we weren't done because

0:32:19.520 --> 0:32:22.320
<v Speaker 2>the Blazers, guys, my goodness, I think the Blazers are

0:32:22.320 --> 0:32:25.160
<v Speaker 2>gonna win the championship solely because of how they've contributed

0:32:25.680 --> 0:32:28.160
<v Speaker 2>to the hashtag we are Edgie because we got wedgie

0:32:28.200 --> 0:32:30.840
<v Speaker 2>number thirteen on the season once again in a Blazers game,

0:32:30.880 --> 0:32:33.040
<v Speaker 2>and once again Lamar heard on the.

0:32:32.920 --> 0:32:36.600
<v Speaker 8>Call, Robinson denied by Kempy tenn and what do we

0:32:36.640 --> 0:32:42.400
<v Speaker 8>have portally have a weggie? We've gotten more of those

0:32:42.440 --> 0:32:45.120
<v Speaker 8>over the last three or four gas. We really have

0:32:45.400 --> 0:32:47.680
<v Speaker 8>make that pass, good job and they go up and

0:32:47.800 --> 0:32:48.440
<v Speaker 8>get that in.

0:32:48.520 --> 0:32:51.080
<v Speaker 4>It was that our fourth one fourth. That's the rare

0:32:51.200 --> 0:32:51.800
<v Speaker 4>block wedg.

0:32:51.840 --> 0:32:54.440
<v Speaker 2>You can see those in the wild patients.

0:32:54.720 --> 0:32:57.480
<v Speaker 8>Then I'm join those guys pretty so we're going to

0:32:57.520 --> 0:32:59.640
<v Speaker 8>talk about Yeah.

0:32:59.320 --> 0:33:02.920
<v Speaker 2>Look at that, Lamar heard teasing his appearance coming up

0:33:02.960 --> 0:33:06.800
<v Speaker 2>here on No Dunks incredible and it's like, yeah, what

0:33:06.880 --> 0:33:09.760
<v Speaker 2>is that our fourth Blazer's wedgie? Is that right? That's

0:33:09.840 --> 0:33:13.120
<v Speaker 2>unbelievable this early in the season. Lamar heard, though, Blazer's

0:33:13.080 --> 0:33:15.080
<v Speaker 2>broadcaster is coming on our show later this week. We

0:33:15.080 --> 0:33:17.160
<v Speaker 2>got them penciled in for Wednesday. Got to talk to

0:33:17.240 --> 0:33:20.680
<v Speaker 2>him about weggies. And that's of course his Blazers team

0:33:20.880 --> 0:33:22.440
<v Speaker 2>got a whole lot more incredible.

0:33:22.720 --> 0:33:25.160
<v Speaker 4>That was a crazy wedgie too, That was very soft

0:33:25.160 --> 0:33:27.640
<v Speaker 4>the way it kind of like got just loaded up there.

0:33:27.640 --> 0:33:28.280
<v Speaker 4>It was meant to be.

0:33:28.520 --> 0:33:31.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, very low, I would say too low underneath it

0:33:32.000 --> 0:33:34.600
<v Speaker 2>quite under the rim. So that's fantastic. We're at thirteen

0:33:34.640 --> 0:33:37.320
<v Speaker 2>Wedgies tasks, Okay, we are. I mean, we'd have to

0:33:37.320 --> 0:33:38.880
<v Speaker 2>go back and check, but I'm not sure we've ever

0:33:38.920 --> 0:33:43.440
<v Speaker 2>had a start this hot right thirteen, like, and we're

0:33:43.520 --> 0:33:44.479
<v Speaker 2>month into the season.

0:33:45.680 --> 0:33:49.480
<v Speaker 5>I can confirm no chance we've had such a hot start.

0:33:49.480 --> 0:33:53.200
<v Speaker 5>There's no chance that we're on pace for sixty ish

0:33:53.280 --> 0:33:56.479
<v Speaker 5>to start the season and a seventy two game season.

0:33:56.680 --> 0:33:59.200
<v Speaker 5>Oh and yes, we've taken that into account all those

0:33:59.240 --> 0:34:03.520
<v Speaker 5>asking we include playoffs, but at this rate, layoffs are

0:34:03.560 --> 0:34:07.800
<v Speaker 5>gonna be gravy on the low hanging Weggies. We're gonna

0:34:07.840 --> 0:34:10.400
<v Speaker 5>blow through fifty. It feels like. Yeah, and it the

0:34:10.440 --> 0:34:13.279
<v Speaker 5>man who gives us credit, Lamar Hurd, to have him

0:34:13.280 --> 0:34:15.239
<v Speaker 5>on the call for four of them. This is the

0:34:15.320 --> 0:34:16.000
<v Speaker 5>year of the Wedggie.

0:34:16.480 --> 0:34:20.120
<v Speaker 2>It's truly amazing. And one more Nuggets related thing, Okay,

0:34:20.200 --> 0:34:22.520
<v Speaker 2>to bring it back to the Nuggets, I just wanted

0:34:22.560 --> 0:34:25.360
<v Speaker 2>to bring attention to this Monte Morris nickname on Basketball

0:34:25.360 --> 0:34:27.920
<v Speaker 2>Reference that was making the rounds over the weekend, and

0:34:27.960 --> 0:34:29.840
<v Speaker 2>I pointed out that We had nothing to do with this,

0:34:29.960 --> 0:34:33.600
<v Speaker 2>but I wish we did. One of Monte Morris's nicknames

0:34:34.360 --> 0:34:39.480
<v Speaker 2>is count of Monte assist slash teo. You know for turnover.

0:34:39.560 --> 0:34:42.920
<v Speaker 2>He's got a great assist to turnover ratio Count of

0:34:43.200 --> 0:34:46.719
<v Speaker 2>Monte assist you. I can't believe Task didn't come up

0:34:46.760 --> 0:34:50.000
<v Speaker 2>with this, Orley or me for that matter, because this

0:34:50.080 --> 0:34:52.200
<v Speaker 2>is right in our wheelhouse. But it wasn't us. I

0:34:52.239 --> 0:34:54.560
<v Speaker 2>don't know who did it. Maybe just the people in

0:34:54.640 --> 0:34:57.719
<v Speaker 2>Basketball Reference are having some fun. But what a nickname?

0:34:59.080 --> 0:35:02.600
<v Speaker 4>What a nickname? Honestly though, if Count of Monte Assisto

0:35:02.840 --> 0:35:06.520
<v Speaker 4>can make it, why is Ray Biscuit's dad quest not

0:35:06.760 --> 0:35:08.160
<v Speaker 4>on Basketball Reference?

0:35:08.200 --> 0:35:11.640
<v Speaker 2>Come on for favous bass kids. Yes, that's uh, we

0:35:11.640 --> 0:35:13.960
<v Speaker 2>should get that up there. So what a weekend for

0:35:14.000 --> 0:35:16.520
<v Speaker 2>the Nuggets there? What a weekend overall? I will say

0:35:16.520 --> 0:35:18.839
<v Speaker 2>a mini winner of the weekend Jalen Brown. I mean,

0:35:18.880 --> 0:35:21.160
<v Speaker 2>I know you don't want to watch Celtic Sixers matchup

0:35:21.160 --> 0:35:24.880
<v Speaker 2>in the playoffs, fair enough tests, but Jalen Brown somehow

0:35:25.440 --> 0:35:28.359
<v Speaker 2>scored the most points ever in the shot clock era

0:35:28.400 --> 0:35:30.520
<v Speaker 2>at least, so we're talking since nineteen fifty four to

0:35:30.600 --> 0:35:33.560
<v Speaker 2>fifty five, most points scored in under twenty minutes in

0:35:33.600 --> 0:35:37.320
<v Speaker 2>a game last night yesterday thirty three points, shot thirteen

0:35:37.360 --> 0:35:42.399
<v Speaker 2>to twenty in just nineteen minutes, which is pretty damn

0:35:42.440 --> 0:35:43.240
<v Speaker 2>special there lately.

0:35:43.320 --> 0:35:45.759
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I would have thought someone like staff or Clay

0:35:45.760 --> 0:35:48.080
<v Speaker 3>Thompson would have done better than that at some point.

0:35:48.160 --> 0:35:48.360
<v Speaker 7>You know.

0:35:48.520 --> 0:35:50.600
<v Speaker 3>It just it was weird. I saw that stat as well.

0:35:50.640 --> 0:35:53.959
<v Speaker 3>I'm like, eh, that seems like that's not that many

0:35:53.960 --> 0:35:57.040
<v Speaker 3>points really for the way that the players scored in

0:35:57.080 --> 0:35:58.719
<v Speaker 3>the league these days, you know, or even someone like

0:35:58.760 --> 0:36:01.239
<v Speaker 3>shack back in his day. Maybe in one of those

0:36:01.239 --> 0:36:03.319
<v Speaker 3>blowouts he plays only the first half and he has

0:36:03.400 --> 0:36:07.560
<v Speaker 3>like thirty six points or something. But shit, very very

0:36:07.600 --> 0:36:10.799
<v Speaker 3>weird Mann thinking out all sorts of crazy stats these days.

0:36:10.840 --> 0:36:13.640
<v Speaker 3>It's like the Baseball Baseball they always come up with, oh,

0:36:13.680 --> 0:36:16.080
<v Speaker 3>he's a he's betting six hundred against lefties on a

0:36:16.160 --> 0:36:17.680
<v Speaker 3>Tuesday and the open.

0:36:17.440 --> 0:36:19.120
<v Speaker 4>Roof, you know, and it's like.

0:36:19.280 --> 0:36:20.640
<v Speaker 3>Alright, alright, it cares.

0:36:20.680 --> 0:36:24.319
<v Speaker 4>But maybe that damn I've talking Tampa Tom. I saw

0:36:24.480 --> 0:36:26.360
<v Speaker 4>quite the stat for him over the weekend. He was

0:36:26.360 --> 0:36:29.200
<v Speaker 4>like twenty five and four when games are under twenty

0:36:29.280 --> 0:36:32.680
<v Speaker 4>nine degrees, when you're bringing in the degrees that's a wow.

0:36:33.320 --> 0:36:35.360
<v Speaker 4>But Jaalen, Man, this guy is straight up ball. And

0:36:35.400 --> 0:36:37.160
<v Speaker 4>he had the thirty three and nineteen minutes, like you said,

0:36:37.200 --> 0:36:40.759
<v Speaker 4>also had forty two against the Sixers, and earlier this season, right,

0:36:40.760 --> 0:36:43.319
<v Speaker 4>he had forty two and twenty nine minutes and that

0:36:43.400 --> 0:36:46.719
<v Speaker 4>was like the greatest Celtics performance since Larry Bird at

0:36:46.719 --> 0:36:49.360
<v Speaker 4>the time. So this guy is knocking off legends left and.

0:36:49.400 --> 0:36:51.719
<v Speaker 2>Right here, Oh, Trey, I mean, on Friday's podcast, on

0:36:51.719 --> 0:36:53.960
<v Speaker 2>the Drop podcast, we were doing our one Month in

0:36:54.040 --> 0:36:56.680
<v Speaker 2>awards and like sort of blew my mind when you

0:36:56.719 --> 0:37:00.160
<v Speaker 2>said Jayalen Brown for Most Improved. Man, I mean, I'm

0:37:00.200 --> 0:37:01.839
<v Speaker 2>all on board with this pick. Now. I know there's

0:37:01.880 --> 0:37:04.319
<v Speaker 2>some other great candidates, but he is averaging. Jalen Brown

0:37:04.360 --> 0:37:07.400
<v Speaker 2>is averaging twenty seven point three points per game, six boards,

0:37:07.440 --> 0:37:09.680
<v Speaker 2>three and a half assists. He's shooting fifty three percent

0:37:09.719 --> 0:37:12.920
<v Speaker 2>from the floor, really good numbers across the board. And

0:37:13.000 --> 0:37:15.480
<v Speaker 2>like Tatum's been in the lineup because of COVID nineteen,

0:37:15.560 --> 0:37:17.919
<v Speaker 2>Kemball obviously wasn't there for a good chunk. Celtics still

0:37:17.920 --> 0:37:20.920
<v Speaker 2>of a decent record. I actually was shocked. I went

0:37:20.920 --> 0:37:23.120
<v Speaker 2>to Basketball Reference this morning thinking Jalen Brown may have

0:37:23.200 --> 0:37:28.280
<v Speaker 2>cracked the like their top ten you know NBA MVP

0:37:28.360 --> 0:37:30.600
<v Speaker 2>Award tracker thing. It's all based on numbers and previous

0:37:30.680 --> 0:37:32.480
<v Speaker 2>votes and stuff like that. But he's not in there yet.

0:37:32.480 --> 0:37:35.160
<v Speaker 2>But he's got to be damn close with what he's doing.

0:37:35.200 --> 0:37:38.160
<v Speaker 2>But most improved. He's looking like a looking like a

0:37:38.160 --> 0:37:40.239
<v Speaker 2>great pick. Though I think maybe he'll be too much

0:37:40.239 --> 0:37:42.279
<v Speaker 2>in the MVP conversation if he keeps us up that

0:37:42.280 --> 0:37:45.160
<v Speaker 2>it could hurt him. But crazy stat and a crazy

0:37:45.160 --> 0:37:45.840
<v Speaker 2>new record.

0:37:45.640 --> 0:37:48.319
<v Speaker 4>There, Yeah, that's possible. He looks like the perfect one

0:37:48.400 --> 0:37:50.839
<v Speaker 4>B right now? Am I? Right late? Because he's he's

0:37:50.880 --> 0:37:53.560
<v Speaker 4>fitting along, looking like a number one option playing alongside

0:37:53.600 --> 0:37:56.480
<v Speaker 4>Jason Tatum or playing alongside Kemba Walker. It's the perfect

0:37:56.520 --> 0:37:58.000
<v Speaker 4>one bee? What the one JB?

0:37:58.160 --> 0:38:01.600
<v Speaker 3>If if he was to MVP, surely he would have

0:38:01.640 --> 0:38:04.040
<v Speaker 3>to also in most improved because who would have improved

0:38:04.080 --> 0:38:06.160
<v Speaker 3>more than him to go from a non MVP to

0:38:06.239 --> 0:38:07.200
<v Speaker 3>MVP this season.

0:38:07.239 --> 0:38:09.480
<v Speaker 2>Well, we had that conversation with Steph Curry. I remember

0:38:09.520 --> 0:38:11.080
<v Speaker 2>back in the day people were trying to give it

0:38:11.120 --> 0:38:12.759
<v Speaker 2>to him as well. I just think if you're in

0:38:12.760 --> 0:38:15.399
<v Speaker 2>the MVP conversation or you're winning it for that matter,

0:38:15.560 --> 0:38:17.400
<v Speaker 2>you're you're out of the running.

0:38:17.120 --> 0:38:17.920
<v Speaker 5>For most Improved.

0:38:17.960 --> 0:38:19.640
<v Speaker 2>I feel like it's just a rule that we came up.

0:38:19.680 --> 0:38:24.160
<v Speaker 2>But all right, those are our winners of the weekend.

0:38:24.200 --> 0:38:26.160
<v Speaker 2>Let's get to loser's task at started. What do you got?

0:38:26.719 --> 0:38:29.919
<v Speaker 5>I gotta start with the New Orleans Pelicans because last

0:38:30.000 --> 0:38:33.520
<v Speaker 5>year we went to the bubble thinking the Pelicans were

0:38:33.520 --> 0:38:37.040
<v Speaker 5>put into that situation. They brought in the Pelicans and

0:38:37.080 --> 0:38:40.960
<v Speaker 5>their their record where they were standing. Because everybody wanted

0:38:40.960 --> 0:38:44.320
<v Speaker 5>to see Zion Williamson. They increased the number of teams

0:38:44.360 --> 0:38:46.879
<v Speaker 5>to get Zion there. The hopes were there for them

0:38:46.920 --> 0:38:49.440
<v Speaker 5>to get in. Their defense did not show up for

0:38:49.480 --> 0:38:52.399
<v Speaker 5>Alvin Gentry, so he was acts. After five seasons, stan

0:38:52.480 --> 0:38:55.440
<v Speaker 5>Ban Gundy inserted and after seven games this season it

0:38:55.480 --> 0:38:58.640
<v Speaker 5>looked like the SPG insertion was fantastic. They had the

0:38:58.640 --> 0:39:02.560
<v Speaker 5>fourth rank d but since then they're twenty ninth and

0:39:02.800 --> 0:39:05.440
<v Speaker 5>they now have, you know, the second worst defense. For

0:39:05.480 --> 0:39:07.680
<v Speaker 5>a good stretch of the season, they've lost eight of nine,

0:39:07.719 --> 0:39:10.919
<v Speaker 5>including to the Timberwolves on Saturday, who didn't have Karl

0:39:10.960 --> 0:39:12.719
<v Speaker 5>Anthony Towns it won't for a while, and they didn't

0:39:12.719 --> 0:39:16.280
<v Speaker 5>have Dangel Russell who was resting. Excuse me, d Angel

0:39:16.360 --> 0:39:19.160
<v Speaker 5>Russell resting the fifteenth best team in the Western Conference

0:39:19.480 --> 0:39:24.640
<v Speaker 5>as resting one of their players, Come on, I don't, yeah,

0:39:24.680 --> 0:39:26.920
<v Speaker 5>it absolutely did. Yeah, they played like a team and

0:39:26.960 --> 0:39:30.200
<v Speaker 5>they won. The thing is with the Pels, they've decided

0:39:30.239 --> 0:39:32.160
<v Speaker 5>to play like the Bucks a little bit. Let's shut

0:39:32.160 --> 0:39:35.000
<v Speaker 5>down the lane, not send anybody to free throw line,

0:39:35.920 --> 0:39:40.160
<v Speaker 5>and allow three point shots to happen. The The objective, though,

0:39:40.280 --> 0:39:42.239
<v Speaker 5>is to make the guys who can't shoot all that

0:39:42.280 --> 0:39:44.120
<v Speaker 5>well shoot the three point shots and take away the

0:39:44.160 --> 0:39:48.160
<v Speaker 5>corner threes. And that's just hasn't happened. And Steven Adams

0:39:48.360 --> 0:39:51.120
<v Speaker 5>has been sucking up a lot of those defensive rebounds.

0:39:51.120 --> 0:39:53.759
<v Speaker 5>But Zion Williamson not a great defensive rebounder, and they're

0:39:53.760 --> 0:39:57.279
<v Speaker 5>allowing opponents to shoot seventy percent at the rim. That's

0:39:57.280 --> 0:39:59.439
<v Speaker 5>not good enough. That's you know, one of the worst

0:39:59.440 --> 0:40:02.440
<v Speaker 5>marks in the lead. Stevie Adams that's not his forte

0:40:03.120 --> 0:40:05.560
<v Speaker 5>So they're not playing hard enough. I think that's what

0:40:05.600 --> 0:40:09.120
<v Speaker 5>it comes down to. They're just not a defensive outfit.

0:40:09.719 --> 0:40:12.200
<v Speaker 5>So they have to pick this thing up because they're

0:40:12.239 --> 0:40:15.759
<v Speaker 5>one of those. To me, they're kind of one of

0:40:15.800 --> 0:40:20.680
<v Speaker 5>the interesting teams coming into the season, and the idea was, yeah,

0:40:20.719 --> 0:40:23.640
<v Speaker 5>they're going to be this hard hat team with Stevie

0:40:23.680 --> 0:40:26.560
<v Speaker 5>Adams in the middle. And now people are thinking, well,

0:40:26.600 --> 0:40:30.280
<v Speaker 5>maybe Zion should play the five, and maybe they should

0:40:30.280 --> 0:40:32.400
<v Speaker 5>just throw JJ Reddick in the starting lineup because Eric

0:40:32.440 --> 0:40:35.640
<v Speaker 5>Letso and Lonzo Ball aren't scoring, and so maybe they

0:40:35.640 --> 0:40:37.800
<v Speaker 5>should just go all offense basically because Zion at the

0:40:37.800 --> 0:40:40.920
<v Speaker 5>five is not going to be amazing defensively. Hey, for me,

0:40:41.360 --> 0:40:43.680
<v Speaker 5>that would be fun to watch, but for stan Ban Gundy,

0:40:44.040 --> 0:40:46.480
<v Speaker 5>he'd pull out every single hair he has on his head,

0:40:46.520 --> 0:40:49.040
<v Speaker 5>I think watching that. So Stevie Adams is going to

0:40:49.080 --> 0:40:50.600
<v Speaker 5>stay at the center spot. But they just have to

0:40:50.600 --> 0:40:54.360
<v Speaker 5>get better. And so the Pelicans, although the Western Conference

0:40:54.400 --> 0:40:57.879
<v Speaker 5>is full of good stories, the Pelicans are not one

0:40:57.880 --> 0:40:59.440
<v Speaker 5>of them at this point. They come home and they

0:40:59.440 --> 0:41:01.040
<v Speaker 5>are going to have lots of games at home to

0:41:01.080 --> 0:41:05.280
<v Speaker 5>try and get their defense right. But all those tenets

0:41:06.040 --> 0:41:09.640
<v Speaker 5>that are you know, their defense is based on, is

0:41:09.680 --> 0:41:12.360
<v Speaker 5>just they're just not coming through on them at this point.

0:41:12.400 --> 0:41:14.839
<v Speaker 5>Eight of nine, last eight of nine that they're they're

0:41:14.840 --> 0:41:15.520
<v Speaker 5>too good for that.

0:41:16.000 --> 0:41:19.840
<v Speaker 2>I saw Kendrick Perkins too, tweeting about them over the weekend.

0:41:20.040 --> 0:41:22.360
<v Speaker 2>He said, you all really thought stan Van Gundy was

0:41:22.400 --> 0:41:25.840
<v Speaker 2>the one. Huh, the Pelicans should have hired a young stud.

0:41:25.920 --> 0:41:28.040
<v Speaker 2>But don't mind me though, carry on, And then I

0:41:28.080 --> 0:41:29.719
<v Speaker 2>saw that. I the only reason I think I saw that.

0:41:29.760 --> 0:41:32.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure if I do follow Kendrick Perkins, but

0:41:32.160 --> 0:41:37.000
<v Speaker 2>I saw Baron Davis retweet it basically doubling down agreeing

0:41:37.040 --> 0:41:39.799
<v Speaker 2>with Kendrick Perkins, sort of like, yeah, people, you know,

0:41:40.000 --> 0:41:42.879
<v Speaker 2>young guys, I guess do not really want to buy

0:41:42.880 --> 0:41:46.799
<v Speaker 2>into what SVG is selling. So I don't know some

0:41:46.840 --> 0:41:48.520
<v Speaker 2>former players thinking that, at least I don't know if

0:41:48.520 --> 0:41:50.359
<v Speaker 2>there's any truth to that. But it's not good right now.

0:41:50.440 --> 0:41:52.200
<v Speaker 2>You're gonna make loser of the weekend probably if you

0:41:52.239 --> 0:41:55.040
<v Speaker 2>lose to the Timberwolves without their best guys, because they're

0:41:55.080 --> 0:41:57.400
<v Speaker 2>not a great team either. So yeah, it's rough. I

0:41:57.400 --> 0:41:59.080
<v Speaker 2>don't know if you have anything to add tray about

0:41:59.120 --> 0:41:59.719
<v Speaker 2>the Pelicans.

0:42:00.120 --> 0:42:02.040
<v Speaker 4>Well, A lot of the concern, it feels like, is

0:42:02.080 --> 0:42:04.680
<v Speaker 4>on whether or not Zion plays defense, and there's no

0:42:04.680 --> 0:42:07.000
<v Speaker 4>doubt about it. He could be better better at it.

0:42:07.120 --> 0:42:09.759
<v Speaker 4>He would certainly struggle playing as a small ball five

0:42:09.800 --> 0:42:11.600
<v Speaker 4>on the defensive end, but he's getting buckets on the

0:42:11.640 --> 0:42:14.480
<v Speaker 4>offensive end and I really think the main problem with

0:42:14.520 --> 0:42:18.040
<v Speaker 4>them defensively is their guards guard absolutely nobody, Like Lonzo

0:42:18.120 --> 0:42:20.799
<v Speaker 4>guards nobody. Eric Bledsoe guards nobody, and they're both out

0:42:20.840 --> 0:42:23.759
<v Speaker 4>there for their defensive prowess more than anything. It's a

0:42:23.800 --> 0:42:27.400
<v Speaker 4>walk into the lane before you're encountering either Steven Adams

0:42:27.520 --> 0:42:29.520
<v Speaker 4>or Zion, So I mean they're at a bit of

0:42:29.520 --> 0:42:32.439
<v Speaker 4>a disadvantage here getting head starts. The guards are getting

0:42:32.480 --> 0:42:34.719
<v Speaker 4>head starts to try and attack Zion, who's a short

0:42:34.719 --> 0:42:36.640
<v Speaker 4>guy who can maybe put his hands up at the rim,

0:42:36.640 --> 0:42:38.480
<v Speaker 4>but doesn't exactly know where to be. Or Steven Adams,

0:42:38.520 --> 0:42:41.200
<v Speaker 4>who doesn't have great left isn't a super rim protector,

0:42:41.239 --> 0:42:43.279
<v Speaker 4>or just a big guy who takes up space. It's

0:42:43.280 --> 0:42:46.840
<v Speaker 4>not looking good, especially considering they brought in. It was

0:42:46.920 --> 0:42:49.600
<v Speaker 4>Lonzo and Eric Bledsoe and Steven Adams. You thought this

0:42:49.640 --> 0:42:51.120
<v Speaker 4>is going to be a pretty solid defense. For a

0:42:51.160 --> 0:42:53.720
<v Speaker 4>defensive coach in stan van Gundy. He's got to be sick,

0:42:53.880 --> 0:42:57.640
<v Speaker 4>absolutely sick, watching these guys get completely dusted in the

0:42:57.640 --> 0:42:59.640
<v Speaker 4>pick and role. It's not even close. It's like they

0:42:59.640 --> 0:43:01.879
<v Speaker 4>come aund one thing and maybe it's Josh Hart, maybe

0:43:01.880 --> 0:43:04.080
<v Speaker 4>it's JJ Reddick, whoever it is, it is a bucket

0:43:04.080 --> 0:43:05.560
<v Speaker 4>for whichever guard is out there.

0:43:05.719 --> 0:43:07.560
<v Speaker 2>Is this safe to say they are not forming an

0:43:07.640 --> 0:43:11.160
<v Speaker 2>f and wall for Stammangunny in the post huh no

0:43:11.760 --> 0:43:13.760
<v Speaker 2>chain link fence. You can get through it pretty easily

0:43:13.760 --> 0:43:15.759
<v Speaker 2>there ly, although it is easy to get through a

0:43:15.840 --> 0:43:17.640
<v Speaker 2>chain link fence. Yeah, I guess it sort of is

0:43:17.719 --> 0:43:18.560
<v Speaker 2>if you were a mouse.

0:43:18.560 --> 0:43:18.880
<v Speaker 4>It is.

0:43:19.040 --> 0:43:23.120
<v Speaker 2>Think about that. Anything to add to the Pelicans.

0:43:22.640 --> 0:43:24.960
<v Speaker 3>No, it's I mean there's a lot of expectation and

0:43:24.960 --> 0:43:27.759
<v Speaker 3>hope on Zion Williamson and he's scoring fine, he's doing

0:43:27.800 --> 0:43:30.279
<v Speaker 3>all that, but it takes time to learn how to

0:43:30.320 --> 0:43:32.520
<v Speaker 3>play defense. It looks like he just has never really

0:43:33.000 --> 0:43:36.480
<v Speaker 3>been a big defensive player throughout his career, and now

0:43:36.480 --> 0:43:37.880
<v Speaker 3>he's in the NBA and he missed most of his

0:43:37.920 --> 0:43:40.400
<v Speaker 3>first season and his second season. It's like, you're the

0:43:40.400 --> 0:43:43.759
<v Speaker 3>star player in this team. Fine, is scoring nice, but

0:43:43.840 --> 0:43:45.200
<v Speaker 3>you need to be able to also hold up your

0:43:45.200 --> 0:43:47.439
<v Speaker 3>other end on the defensive side, and he's not able

0:43:47.440 --> 0:43:49.400
<v Speaker 3>to do that. So yeah, it's it's like it's a

0:43:49.400 --> 0:43:51.399
<v Speaker 3>battle between the Pelicans and the Kings or who has

0:43:51.440 --> 0:43:55.560
<v Speaker 3>the weakest defense, and neither of them have a very

0:43:55.560 --> 0:43:56.920
<v Speaker 3>impressed at all to this point.

0:43:57.400 --> 0:44:00.319
<v Speaker 2>Trey who do you have for loser the weekend of

0:44:00.360 --> 0:44:00.880
<v Speaker 2>the weekend.

0:44:00.920 --> 0:44:03.000
<v Speaker 4>I hate to do it. It's the Orlando Magic. They

0:44:03.000 --> 0:44:06.280
<v Speaker 4>had a tough weekend. On Friday, they lost to the Pacers.

0:44:06.320 --> 0:44:08.840
<v Speaker 4>In this game, they led with sixteen seconds left in

0:44:08.920 --> 0:44:12.000
<v Speaker 4>regulation to Monto Sabonis gets a bucket, Aaron Gordon a

0:44:12.040 --> 0:44:14.920
<v Speaker 4>turnover on the other side. Then they're up three with

0:44:15.040 --> 0:44:18.360
<v Speaker 4>forty four seconds left in overtime, and then it's buckets

0:44:18.360 --> 0:44:21.520
<v Speaker 4>for Demanta Sabonis and Malcolm Brogden. Fourty A misses a

0:44:21.560 --> 0:44:23.239
<v Speaker 4>three on the other end. After the game, he said,

0:44:23.239 --> 0:44:25.560
<v Speaker 4>this was painful because I thought we fought really hard,

0:44:25.560 --> 0:44:27.840
<v Speaker 4>and I feel like we had this game twice and

0:44:27.840 --> 0:44:29.520
<v Speaker 4>I feel like they stole it away from us. That's

0:44:29.560 --> 0:44:32.800
<v Speaker 4>exactly what it felt like. It happened again on Sunday

0:44:32.880 --> 0:44:35.840
<v Speaker 4>versus the Hornets, another loss. No Aaron Gordon in this one.

0:44:35.880 --> 0:44:38.560
<v Speaker 4>The ball movement was incredible to start. They were, you know,

0:44:38.840 --> 0:44:41.520
<v Speaker 4>they assisted on like twenty one of twenty five baskets

0:44:41.520 --> 0:44:43.440
<v Speaker 4>through three quarters or something like that. But then at

0:44:43.440 --> 0:44:46.480
<v Speaker 4>the start of the fourth quarter the Magic gave up

0:44:46.480 --> 0:44:49.920
<v Speaker 4>a twenty five to four run. Suddenly they're down three.

0:44:50.360 --> 0:44:52.960
<v Speaker 4>They give up two offensive rebounds, then it somehow gets

0:44:52.960 --> 0:44:55.800
<v Speaker 4>to Biznack Bimbo, they foul him. He misses two free throws,

0:44:56.160 --> 0:44:58.400
<v Speaker 4>having forty eight fans Terrence Ross in the corner for

0:44:58.440 --> 0:45:00.560
<v Speaker 4>a chuck of a three it somehow go But then

0:45:00.600 --> 0:45:02.799
<v Speaker 4>on the other side, Gordon Hayward in the midst of

0:45:02.800 --> 0:45:05.200
<v Speaker 4>a good game, he drives right past Evan fourtyer for

0:45:05.239 --> 0:45:07.920
<v Speaker 4>a layup with basically nobody at the rim than the

0:45:07.920 --> 0:45:10.480
<v Speaker 4>Magic at the ball on offense, a five second violation.

0:45:10.680 --> 0:45:14.080
<v Speaker 4>Two tough losses for the Magic. They've lost seven of eight.

0:45:14.560 --> 0:45:16.680
<v Speaker 4>Are they tanking? Like? Are the Magic tanking? I know

0:45:16.719 --> 0:45:19.640
<v Speaker 4>that they went south once Markel Foltz got hurt, but

0:45:19.680 --> 0:45:21.760
<v Speaker 4>they haven't done anything to replace him. They've been running

0:45:21.800 --> 0:45:24.600
<v Speaker 4>Aaron Gordon as their point guard, which understandable you want

0:45:24.600 --> 0:45:26.600
<v Speaker 4>to get some more out of some of your best players.

0:45:26.640 --> 0:45:28.960
<v Speaker 4>See if he's the guy that you're gonna actually keep around.

0:45:29.000 --> 0:45:31.200
<v Speaker 4>But they could have done something. They could have brought

0:45:31.239 --> 0:45:34.319
<v Speaker 4>somebody in on an exception. They could have made a move.

0:45:34.719 --> 0:45:36.880
<v Speaker 4>Evan fourty eight could be traded. It doesn't feel like

0:45:36.880 --> 0:45:39.680
<v Speaker 4>they're doing anything to actually make their team better right

0:45:39.719 --> 0:45:41.200
<v Speaker 4>now when they're really really struggling.

0:45:41.719 --> 0:45:45.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Obviously, the injury bug has nailed them. They're missing

0:45:45.200 --> 0:45:47.359
<v Speaker 2>a lot of their guys. But that's tough. I don't know,

0:45:47.520 --> 0:45:49.640
<v Speaker 2>are they tanking. I hadn't thought about that sort of

0:45:49.640 --> 0:45:51.680
<v Speaker 2>a sneaky tank job if they are, because they're in

0:45:51.760 --> 0:45:53.760
<v Speaker 2>all these games. They could have won half these games,

0:45:53.800 --> 0:45:55.320
<v Speaker 2>but they keep coming up short.

0:45:55.600 --> 0:45:57.319
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, but they're like they're happy to run out there

0:45:57.320 --> 0:45:59.680
<v Speaker 4>with Cole Anthony as the point guard, which is understandable

0:45:59.680 --> 0:46:02.280
<v Speaker 4>as well. You want to get a young guy some reps,

0:46:02.320 --> 0:46:04.440
<v Speaker 4>see what he can do. But he's shooting under forty percent.

0:46:04.440 --> 0:46:05.799
<v Speaker 4>You're not gonna win a lot of games like that.

0:46:05.800 --> 0:46:07.839
<v Speaker 4>When you're an offensive team that already struggles. The problem

0:46:07.920 --> 0:46:09.920
<v Speaker 4>is they can't get stops defensively. This is a team

0:46:09.960 --> 0:46:11.960
<v Speaker 4>that has made their bones on the defensive end, staying

0:46:12.000 --> 0:46:13.719
<v Speaker 4>in every game and coming through in the clutch when

0:46:13.719 --> 0:46:16.400
<v Speaker 4>they need to, but the execution has not been there,

0:46:16.480 --> 0:46:17.320
<v Speaker 4>especially this weekend.

0:46:17.640 --> 0:46:19.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, for the Magic Team to be like nineteenth or

0:46:19.880 --> 0:46:22.239
<v Speaker 2>twentieth defensive rating is not good because they're never going

0:46:22.320 --> 0:46:24.560
<v Speaker 2>to be a great offensive rating team and they are

0:46:24.600 --> 0:46:28.360
<v Speaker 2>not once again this year. But yeah, you know this

0:46:28.440 --> 0:46:30.040
<v Speaker 2>is just gonna be I hate to say it's just

0:46:30.080 --> 0:46:32.279
<v Speaker 2>gonna be one of these classic magic years where, like

0:46:32.640 --> 0:46:34.960
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, they'll be maybe flirting maybe with the

0:46:35.000 --> 0:46:37.960
<v Speaker 2>play in tournament. I would think i'd picked them. They'll

0:46:37.960 --> 0:46:41.040
<v Speaker 2>be on the outside looking in, just outside. But it's

0:46:41.040 --> 0:46:42.600
<v Speaker 2>not like they're going to be probably the worst team

0:46:42.640 --> 0:46:44.960
<v Speaker 2>in the league either, right lely, like they're just sort

0:46:44.960 --> 0:46:46.799
<v Speaker 2>of stuck in this light little Noman's land.

0:46:46.960 --> 0:46:49.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, guys like forty A and Terrence Rossa

0:46:49.160 --> 0:46:53.000
<v Speaker 3>I would attract some interest on the trademarket, but not much.

0:46:53.080 --> 0:46:54.680
<v Speaker 3>I mean, no one's gonna all of a sudden turn

0:46:54.719 --> 0:46:57.080
<v Speaker 3>around the franchisea So I think they do need to

0:46:57.120 --> 0:47:00.960
<v Speaker 3>tank effect and probably so saught again because you know Vucevich.

0:47:01.000 --> 0:47:03.319
<v Speaker 3>You know, he's one of those guys who he's an

0:47:03.360 --> 0:47:05.360
<v Speaker 3>All Star. He's definitely an Allstar. He was an All

0:47:05.400 --> 0:47:08.080
<v Speaker 3>Star a few years ago. But he just doesn't move

0:47:08.120 --> 0:47:10.000
<v Speaker 3>the needle all that much, even if he's having a

0:47:10.000 --> 0:47:12.839
<v Speaker 3>good season, which he is. But the game last night

0:47:12.840 --> 0:47:15.319
<v Speaker 3>against the Hornets was definitely there. I mean, I know

0:47:15.440 --> 0:47:17.239
<v Speaker 3>you mentioned the Pacers as well, but that was there

0:47:17.280 --> 0:47:19.319
<v Speaker 3>to be won, and in the fourth quarter they got

0:47:19.320 --> 0:47:22.600
<v Speaker 3>the yips and could not finish this game, couldn't score

0:47:22.640 --> 0:47:25.520
<v Speaker 3>down the stretch, whereas Gordon Hayward could. And Gordon Hayward

0:47:25.520 --> 0:47:28.440
<v Speaker 3>I absolutely loved his game winning drive there he went inside,

0:47:28.440 --> 0:47:30.600
<v Speaker 3>he didn't go over the hero ball. Instead, he made

0:47:30.640 --> 0:47:33.279
<v Speaker 3>a solid move, got inside, laid it up, beautiful way

0:47:33.320 --> 0:47:35.919
<v Speaker 3>to finish the game. Had thirty nine points, and this

0:47:36.000 --> 0:47:38.440
<v Speaker 3>was one that was like, You're going to get teams

0:47:38.520 --> 0:47:40.600
<v Speaker 3>like Charlotte who are a little bit up and down themselves,

0:47:40.719 --> 0:47:42.440
<v Speaker 3>and when you're in a position to finish them off,

0:47:42.480 --> 0:47:44.840
<v Speaker 3>you have to do that. And Orlando just couldn't do it.

0:47:44.840 --> 0:47:48.239
<v Speaker 3>And again it's both ends. Couldn't execute defensively and offensively.

0:47:48.239 --> 0:47:51.480
<v Speaker 3>It wasn't any better. So yeah, two and eight in

0:47:51.480 --> 0:47:54.279
<v Speaker 3>their last ten. I think they were probably punching above

0:47:54.320 --> 0:47:56.600
<v Speaker 3>their way at the start of the season, acknowledging they

0:47:56.600 --> 0:47:58.239
<v Speaker 3>have lost some players to injuries. But again, I mean

0:47:58.280 --> 0:48:00.759
<v Speaker 3>Fulks was having a decent season, but not like, oh

0:48:00.760 --> 0:48:03.040
<v Speaker 3>my god, how can they compete now without fults out there?

0:48:03.080 --> 0:48:06.200
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, not sure really what the prospects are for

0:48:06.280 --> 0:48:07.640
<v Speaker 3>the Magic for the rest of the season.

0:48:08.120 --> 0:48:10.560
<v Speaker 5>I loved watching Gordon Hayward's drive, but for a couple

0:48:10.600 --> 0:48:14.080
<v Speaker 5>of different reasons. First, watching Evan Fournier guard him. I

0:48:14.120 --> 0:48:16.920
<v Speaker 5>was shocked, the shock that he was guarding him. I

0:48:16.960 --> 0:48:19.960
<v Speaker 5>thought there must be like sixteen switches that have happened

0:48:20.000 --> 0:48:22.080
<v Speaker 5>to have Evan Fournier gardener because he's not a defensive

0:48:22.120 --> 0:48:24.600
<v Speaker 5>stopp or, he's an offensive guy. And Evan Fournier he

0:48:24.680 --> 0:48:28.040
<v Speaker 5>got cooked. And then at the rim, Yeah, ken Burch

0:48:28.200 --> 0:48:31.319
<v Speaker 5>was super late getting over there to help out, and

0:48:31.360 --> 0:48:36.040
<v Speaker 5>Steve Clifford, Magic's head coach, was leave it and to

0:48:36.120 --> 0:48:39.680
<v Speaker 5>see him get right in ken Birch's face into the

0:48:39.719 --> 0:48:43.120
<v Speaker 5>trees face and get super angry that it was a

0:48:43.120 --> 0:48:46.279
<v Speaker 5>good play. But yeah, Gordon Hayward super pumped for that

0:48:46.400 --> 0:48:49.680
<v Speaker 5>drive to finish it a thirty nine point game. Guy's

0:48:49.719 --> 0:48:52.560
<v Speaker 5>ballin this four to thirty point game of the season.

0:48:53.040 --> 0:48:55.240
<v Speaker 5>The offense is there, and they're one of those Eastern

0:48:55.239 --> 0:48:58.000
<v Speaker 5>Conference teams that are Yeah, they could be good, they

0:48:58.080 --> 0:49:01.319
<v Speaker 5>might not be. It's surprising with him playing so well

0:49:01.360 --> 0:49:04.960
<v Speaker 5>that they're at seven to nine. I believe that that

0:49:05.239 --> 0:49:07.520
<v Speaker 5>popped him up to seven and nine. It should be

0:49:07.520 --> 0:49:10.680
<v Speaker 5>better than that. They should, you know, with with Lonzo Ball,

0:49:11.320 --> 0:49:15.439
<v Speaker 5>not Lonzo the other one, LaMelo Ball playing that well,

0:49:15.640 --> 0:49:17.279
<v Speaker 5>you know that they co'd expect them to be better

0:49:17.280 --> 0:49:19.279
<v Speaker 5>than seven nine, and now they got Cody z back

0:49:19.360 --> 0:49:22.200
<v Speaker 5>as well. But on the other side, yeah, the Magic.

0:49:23.000 --> 0:49:24.920
<v Speaker 5>They would have rather had Mark l Folts on him,

0:49:24.960 --> 0:49:27.479
<v Speaker 5>he's hurt. Rather have Aaron Gordon on him, he's hurt.

0:49:27.880 --> 0:49:30.400
<v Speaker 5>They would rather have Michael Carter Williams on him. Is

0:49:30.440 --> 0:49:32.279
<v Speaker 5>Michael Carter Williams back. I'm not sure they'd rather to

0:49:32.280 --> 0:49:35.239
<v Speaker 5>have Jonathan Isaac on him. Yeah, so, yeah, they are

0:49:35.280 --> 0:49:35.759
<v Speaker 5>banged up.

0:49:36.440 --> 0:49:37.640
<v Speaker 2>Lee. What's your favorite tree?

0:49:39.400 --> 0:49:41.799
<v Speaker 3>Probably the gum tree? Okay, classy gum tree.

0:49:41.840 --> 0:49:43.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I asked you that before.

0:49:44.080 --> 0:49:46.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think so. I think we've talked about trees

0:49:46.960 --> 0:49:50.280
<v Speaker 3>because they were in Athens. Remember that's for the Olympics.

0:49:50.280 --> 0:49:50.640
<v Speaker 3>I remember.

0:49:50.920 --> 0:49:53.879
<v Speaker 2>It's a beautiful I love I love a birch tree, though.

0:49:53.960 --> 0:49:56.239
<v Speaker 2>I do like how a birch tree looks. That's why

0:49:56.280 --> 0:49:59.399
<v Speaker 2>I was papery exactly. Do you have a favorite tree?

0:49:59.640 --> 0:49:59.799
<v Speaker 5>Try?

0:50:00.640 --> 0:50:03.359
<v Speaker 4>My favorite Southern tree is the crape myrtle. I like those.

0:50:03.400 --> 0:50:05.319
<v Speaker 4>I like that smooth look you get on the bark there.

0:50:05.520 --> 0:50:08.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's really nice. Good good tree picks. Test. I mean,

0:50:08.840 --> 0:50:10.360
<v Speaker 2>I'll finish this off. You got a favorite tree?

0:50:10.600 --> 0:50:12.680
<v Speaker 5>We're staying in the South. You know, I have got

0:50:12.719 --> 0:50:15.120
<v Speaker 5>different regions. I like different trees in the South. The

0:50:15.160 --> 0:50:18.160
<v Speaker 5>Spanish moss. It's an amazing tree.

0:50:18.760 --> 0:50:22.600
<v Speaker 2>Remind me what we're talking about. It's like very moss

0:50:22.680 --> 0:50:23.200
<v Speaker 2>like appearance.

0:50:23.239 --> 0:50:27.040
<v Speaker 5>I assume absolutely, it's like it's like a weeping willow.

0:50:27.200 --> 0:50:29.000
<v Speaker 4>Okay, sort of nice.

0:50:29.440 --> 0:50:30.239
<v Speaker 5>It's a unique tree.

0:50:30.320 --> 0:50:32.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, beautiful tree. JD. Do you have a favorite tree?

0:50:33.320 --> 0:50:37.440
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, it's the maple obviously, so.

0:50:37.440 --> 0:50:39.839
<v Speaker 2>You like this, you'd like to tap that? Eh, tap

0:50:39.920 --> 0:50:40.239
<v Speaker 2>that tree?

0:50:40.400 --> 0:50:41.760
<v Speaker 6>Like to tap that tree?

0:50:44.160 --> 0:50:47.080
<v Speaker 2>Kinky son of a bit? All right, my loser of

0:50:47.120 --> 0:50:49.480
<v Speaker 2>the weekend, I'll go with the Wizards. Let's keep this

0:50:49.600 --> 0:50:50.080
<v Speaker 2>very quickly.

0:50:50.360 --> 0:50:50.560
<v Speaker 7>Now.

0:50:50.640 --> 0:50:52.080
<v Speaker 2>The Wizards are sort of in a weird way a

0:50:52.120 --> 0:50:54.160
<v Speaker 2>winter of the weekend because they're actually back playing basketball.

0:50:54.200 --> 0:50:55.960
<v Speaker 2>Do you guys remember the Wizards. They're one of the

0:50:55.960 --> 0:50:58.200
<v Speaker 2>teams in this league. They hadn't played in like two weeks,

0:50:58.200 --> 0:51:00.600
<v Speaker 2>but they did play on Sunday. Thing Is came back

0:51:00.719 --> 0:51:02.440
<v Speaker 2>and they got their ass handed to them in the

0:51:02.440 --> 0:51:04.480
<v Speaker 2>second half by the Spurs. They lost by twenty. They

0:51:04.520 --> 0:51:07.319
<v Speaker 2>had good start and they were spunky to start, but

0:51:07.440 --> 0:51:09.960
<v Speaker 2>then they just got hammered as the game went on.

0:51:10.040 --> 0:51:13.359
<v Speaker 2>They tired. They're short on guys. I mean, they're it's

0:51:13.400 --> 0:51:16.239
<v Speaker 2>getting desperate there. You know, they're signing Alex lenn and

0:51:16.360 --> 0:51:18.920
<v Speaker 2>Jordan Bell. If you got a short last name, you

0:51:18.960 --> 0:51:22.160
<v Speaker 2>can play for this team. They want to save money

0:51:22.160 --> 0:51:23.960
<v Speaker 2>on the letters on the back of their jerseys, right,

0:51:24.320 --> 0:51:26.279
<v Speaker 2>so they going for short names. I think Jeremy Lynn

0:51:26.320 --> 0:51:27.880
<v Speaker 2>might get a call over or it might be in

0:51:27.920 --> 0:51:30.320
<v Speaker 2>the Wizard's uniforms soon. But anyway, Westbrook was back in the lineup.

0:51:30.400 --> 0:51:32.000
<v Speaker 2>I bring this up for a real loser the weekend.

0:51:32.320 --> 0:51:34.320
<v Speaker 2>Did you guys see Westbrook? I mean it is u

0:51:34.680 --> 0:51:37.000
<v Speaker 2>he probably should not even be playing. He is coming

0:51:37.000 --> 0:51:39.160
<v Speaker 2>off of an injury. I think it's that quad injury, right,

0:51:39.239 --> 0:51:41.959
<v Speaker 2>and then playing in a while rough in this one

0:51:41.960 --> 0:51:45.680
<v Speaker 2>man three of eleven four turnovers, he's a minus twenty

0:51:45.760 --> 0:51:48.960
<v Speaker 2>and twenty five minutes. I know it's one of your

0:51:48.960 --> 0:51:53.800
<v Speaker 2>favorite stats. Lee, So Russ, I mean, I hope, I hope.

0:51:53.840 --> 0:51:55.719
<v Speaker 2>I hope he can get back to a little bit

0:51:55.719 --> 0:51:57.799
<v Speaker 2>more of the rust of holds. But I'm worried that

0:51:58.480 --> 0:52:00.920
<v Speaker 2>we'll see that at all this year, maybe especially if

0:52:00.920 --> 0:52:02.560
<v Speaker 2>he has to try and like continue to play through

0:52:02.560 --> 0:52:06.600
<v Speaker 2>these lingering issues, injury issues. It's bad.

0:52:07.360 --> 0:52:10.240
<v Speaker 3>Well, and also what's he playing for in there in Washington.

0:52:10.239 --> 0:52:12.040
<v Speaker 3>They're probably not going to make the playoffs, you know,

0:52:12.080 --> 0:52:13.719
<v Speaker 3>and I think he could sort of see like maybe

0:52:13.760 --> 0:52:16.000
<v Speaker 3>it was the bit of the layoff there. But watching

0:52:16.000 --> 0:52:17.719
<v Speaker 3>that game, I was like, he's just like I wish

0:52:17.800 --> 0:52:20.480
<v Speaker 3>I wasn't here, you know, I think he'd rather be

0:52:20.520 --> 0:52:23.719
<v Speaker 3>anywhere else at the moment, because it just feels like he's,

0:52:23.760 --> 0:52:25.080
<v Speaker 3>you know, at the stage of his career where he

0:52:25.120 --> 0:52:27.040
<v Speaker 3>wants to be at least close to a championship, and

0:52:27.080 --> 0:52:29.080
<v Speaker 3>it's a battle just to get to the playoffs. So

0:52:29.600 --> 0:52:32.400
<v Speaker 3>the only real hope is for Bradley build is you know,

0:52:32.440 --> 0:52:34.160
<v Speaker 3>the only positive would be if he can lead the

0:52:34.200 --> 0:52:36.920
<v Speaker 3>league in scoring for the entire season. That's something.

0:52:38.719 --> 0:52:41.799
<v Speaker 2>Wow, that's the next time you have hammer On ask him,

0:52:41.840 --> 0:52:43.839
<v Speaker 2>would you rather lead the league in scoring and win

0:52:43.960 --> 0:52:46.720
<v Speaker 2>three games all year or would you rather win sixty

0:52:46.760 --> 0:52:49.279
<v Speaker 2>games and you know, score five points for you Yeah,

0:52:49.360 --> 0:52:50.000
<v Speaker 2>it would be the question.

0:52:50.520 --> 0:52:53.279
<v Speaker 3>But they Yeah, the Wizards have to figure out a

0:52:53.280 --> 0:52:54.600
<v Speaker 3>way to move on and rebuild.

0:52:54.680 --> 0:52:56.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean, how long Scutty Brook's going to have this job.

0:52:56.640 --> 0:52:57.319
<v Speaker 2>Let's be honest here.

0:52:57.480 --> 0:52:59.080
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think it's the last Yeah, I think the

0:52:59.160 --> 0:53:01.279
<v Speaker 3>last year of his contented and it's like, well, you

0:53:01.320 --> 0:53:04.400
<v Speaker 3>may as well let him finish this season, I guess,

0:53:04.600 --> 0:53:06.080
<v Speaker 3>because who wants that job?

0:53:06.880 --> 0:53:09.200
<v Speaker 2>I would say, do the opposite. Get someone else in here,

0:53:09.280 --> 0:53:11.320
<v Speaker 2>see if they can shake it up. I get something

0:53:11.360 --> 0:53:11.879
<v Speaker 2>else going.

0:53:12.800 --> 0:53:14.960
<v Speaker 3>They need to. They just need to hit the rebuild button.

0:53:15.160 --> 0:53:17.560
<v Speaker 3>They smash it and see what you can get for Beale,

0:53:17.520 --> 0:53:19.000
<v Speaker 3>and see what you can get for Westbrook. Get some

0:53:19.040 --> 0:53:21.160
<v Speaker 3>picks and start again next season.

0:53:21.160 --> 0:53:26.600
<v Speaker 2>I think that Maple Tree and yeah, yeah, Leally, what

0:53:26.600 --> 0:53:28.560
<v Speaker 2>do you got for loser the weekend? Finish us off here?

0:53:28.680 --> 0:53:31.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? So you remember on Friday Show of course, where

0:53:31.160 --> 0:53:34.480
<v Speaker 3>Shack got worst of the week for calling out Donovan Mitchell.

0:53:34.520 --> 0:53:37.600
<v Speaker 3>Well it got worse for Shack over the weekend because

0:53:38.640 --> 0:53:43.520
<v Speaker 3>an Instagram usic named klso Scooped, who does great work. Actually,

0:53:43.520 --> 0:53:45.840
<v Speaker 3>by the way, great artwork, put up a picture of

0:53:45.920 --> 0:53:50.520
<v Speaker 3>Donovan Mitchell dunking on Miami heat Shack like that, and

0:53:50.680 --> 0:53:53.200
<v Speaker 3>I said, Shaq, don't really want the smoke with the spider,

0:53:53.280 --> 0:53:56.279
<v Speaker 3>beautiful job. You know it's a photoshop. Obviously it's a

0:53:56.280 --> 0:54:00.920
<v Speaker 3>photo shop. Well, Shaq didn't appreciate that too much and

0:54:01.000 --> 0:54:04.720
<v Speaker 3>he slid into kalso Scopes DMS there and he said

0:54:05.000 --> 0:54:09.839
<v Speaker 3>shut Joel Dama Domas up and kalso Scope did the

0:54:09.840 --> 0:54:12.080
<v Speaker 3>worst thing by putting it up there, putting it on

0:54:12.080 --> 0:54:14.640
<v Speaker 3>the Instagram and saying, look, he didn't like it. He

0:54:14.680 --> 0:54:17.839
<v Speaker 3>didn't appreciate that. Now, the reason I bring this up

0:54:17.880 --> 0:54:20.840
<v Speaker 3>is because a lot of people who were defending Shack's

0:54:21.200 --> 0:54:24.160
<v Speaker 3>approach or for what he said to Donovan Mitchell Howse

0:54:24.160 --> 0:54:26.440
<v Speaker 3>so we're like, you know, these young guys can't take criticism. Well,

0:54:27.080 --> 0:54:31.600
<v Speaker 3>oh guys apparently can't take a bit of banter either.

0:54:31.800 --> 0:54:35.279
<v Speaker 3>Shack not happy with that. So I think that just

0:54:35.320 --> 0:54:38.839
<v Speaker 3>makes Shack look a little a little petty and not

0:54:38.880 --> 0:54:42.320
<v Speaker 3>being able to handle a jokey sort of critics. Critic, critic,

0:54:42.840 --> 0:54:44.920
<v Speaker 3>critical attack on himself. I don't know what the hell,

0:54:45.160 --> 0:54:50.520
<v Speaker 3>but you can't slide into anyone's DMS these days because

0:54:50.520 --> 0:54:52.600
<v Speaker 3>if you do, people are just going to light you

0:54:52.719 --> 0:54:57.200
<v Speaker 3>up and say, look, man, you look pasthetic. So, you know, Shack,

0:54:58.000 --> 0:55:00.080
<v Speaker 3>it wasn't good what he said to Donovan how he

0:55:00.120 --> 0:55:02.839
<v Speaker 3>said it, and he could have at least manned up

0:55:02.840 --> 0:55:04.720
<v Speaker 3>and have been like, yeah, you know, maybe I shouldn't

0:55:04.719 --> 0:55:05.080
<v Speaker 3>say that.

0:55:05.360 --> 0:55:08.000
<v Speaker 4>What icy heart with, you.

0:55:07.960 --> 0:55:12.640
<v Speaker 3>Know, Lebron. In the general Lebron and Kevin Durant were

0:55:12.640 --> 0:55:15.680
<v Speaker 3>also also made a few comments about you know, Shak's

0:55:15.680 --> 0:55:18.359
<v Speaker 3>approach there, and I think it was right. So yeah,

0:55:18.520 --> 0:55:20.520
<v Speaker 3>I think in the end, Shack did get dunked on

0:55:20.840 --> 0:55:24.200
<v Speaker 3>in the in the social media sense rather than in

0:55:24.200 --> 0:55:25.440
<v Speaker 3>the en court sense.

0:55:26.000 --> 0:55:28.440
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Yeah, we talked about this in Greek detail on

0:55:28.680 --> 0:55:31.719
<v Speaker 2>Friday's podcast, but Lee pointing out that just great art,

0:55:32.080 --> 0:55:33.759
<v Speaker 2>that critical attack of.

0:55:33.880 --> 0:55:41.440
<v Speaker 4>Art boys got me.

0:55:41.960 --> 0:55:44.000
<v Speaker 3>You know, you know, I was thinking about it because

0:55:44.000 --> 0:55:47.239
<v Speaker 3>he because he posted, you know, Miami Heat Shack, who

0:55:47.280 --> 0:55:49.880
<v Speaker 3>was still decent. You know, he won championship there with

0:55:49.880 --> 0:55:52.080
<v Speaker 3>a Heat. Would it have been better to put up

0:55:52.160 --> 0:55:55.439
<v Speaker 3>like Phoenix Suns or Cleveland Cavaliers or even Celtic Shack,

0:55:56.239 --> 0:55:58.360
<v Speaker 3>you know? Or would you or would you go the

0:55:58.400 --> 0:56:01.279
<v Speaker 3>other way and put Laker's shack Orlando Shack where he

0:56:01.440 --> 0:56:03.719
<v Speaker 3>was being indominant and he's still getting dunked on, like

0:56:04.080 --> 0:56:04.880
<v Speaker 3>is it? Is it more?

0:56:05.080 --> 0:56:07.680
<v Speaker 2>I think the Heat's the perfect sweet spot, that's.

0:56:07.560 --> 0:56:10.040
<v Speaker 3>Why, right, Yeah, so he was still good enough, still

0:56:10.040 --> 0:56:11.600
<v Speaker 3>an old stop. Yeah, I guess he was an old

0:56:11.600 --> 0:56:13.479
<v Speaker 3>start in Phoenix as well. It was his last season,

0:56:13.560 --> 0:56:15.960
<v Speaker 3>but yeah, I was thinking, like, you know, if you

0:56:15.960 --> 0:56:19.200
<v Speaker 3>put him up as Shack, like his shack, it's like, oh,

0:56:19.239 --> 0:56:22.000
<v Speaker 3>he's dunking on in a super prime Shack, you know.

0:56:23.080 --> 0:56:24.719
<v Speaker 3>But then you could also just say you put him

0:56:24.760 --> 0:56:26.279
<v Speaker 3>up as the old man Shack getting dunked on.

0:56:26.480 --> 0:56:28.759
<v Speaker 2>Oh, so you got to find the right photo. Come on, man,

0:56:28.920 --> 0:56:31.439
<v Speaker 2>like the photoshop boys, you can't. You got to hope

0:56:31.480 --> 0:56:34.360
<v Speaker 2>there's a good photo from behind of maybe Shack getting

0:56:34.400 --> 0:56:36.719
<v Speaker 2>dunked on previously, then you can photo shop. But in

0:56:36.840 --> 0:56:37.800
<v Speaker 2>that's how this worked.

0:56:37.960 --> 0:56:40.759
<v Speaker 5>One thing I was wondering about. I was wondering, was

0:56:40.800 --> 0:56:45.360
<v Speaker 5>that Shack because what the artist definitely did was accentuate

0:56:45.440 --> 0:56:47.399
<v Speaker 5>hit the role in the back of his head. Yeah,

0:56:47.440 --> 0:56:50.400
<v Speaker 5>you see that that extra little neck role there, making

0:56:50.400 --> 0:56:52.520
<v Speaker 5>Shack look as chunky as possible.

0:56:52.680 --> 0:56:54.960
<v Speaker 2>So you're saying, so you're saying task, maybe this is

0:56:55.000 --> 0:56:57.560
<v Speaker 2>somebody else, and that he's just done a great job

0:56:57.560 --> 0:56:59.839
<v Speaker 2>on the jersey and putting in O'Neil and stuff like that.

0:57:00.320 --> 0:57:04.760
<v Speaker 5>I don't know. I mean, the level said this critical attack,

0:57:05.080 --> 0:57:08.680
<v Speaker 5>it's you know, I don't know, it looks like Shack.

0:57:09.160 --> 0:57:11.439
<v Speaker 5>It definitely, it definitely looks like Shack. Who else could

0:57:11.440 --> 0:57:11.640
<v Speaker 5>it be?

0:57:12.840 --> 0:57:12.960
<v Speaker 3>Art?

0:57:13.000 --> 0:57:13.719
<v Speaker 2>Attack man.

0:57:13.880 --> 0:57:19.040
<v Speaker 5>Wow, Carso Scope with the Critical Attack doing.

0:57:19.000 --> 0:57:21.840
<v Speaker 2>Emergency podcast for any time there's a critical art attack,

0:57:24.120 --> 0:57:24.720
<v Speaker 2>go and check.

0:57:24.600 --> 0:57:26.480
<v Speaker 3>Him out though on Instagram he's got some good nice

0:57:26.560 --> 0:57:27.000
<v Speaker 3>I never.

0:57:27.320 --> 0:57:29.480
<v Speaker 2>Was actually I was gonna say, I've never heard of this,

0:57:29.480 --> 0:57:31.800
<v Speaker 2>this Instagram account. You seem to be a fan. Do

0:57:31.840 --> 0:57:32.280
<v Speaker 2>you follow?

0:57:32.760 --> 0:57:32.880
<v Speaker 4>No?

0:57:32.960 --> 0:57:36.000
<v Speaker 3>I don't, but I know well only because I saw it.

0:57:36.000 --> 0:57:37.400
<v Speaker 3>It was it was going making the round, so I

0:57:37.560 --> 0:57:39.120
<v Speaker 3>checked it out and I scrolled through.

0:57:39.680 --> 0:57:41.040
<v Speaker 2>What else has he done?

0:57:41.320 --> 0:57:44.000
<v Speaker 3>Well, there's a Loonzo and LaVar not LaVar, Lonzo and

0:57:44.040 --> 0:57:46.240
<v Speaker 3>LaMelo sort of going up against each other. There's a

0:57:46.320 --> 0:57:46.880
<v Speaker 3>nice one there.

0:57:46.920 --> 0:57:49.560
<v Speaker 2>Well, so he does a thing where he's merging past

0:57:49.640 --> 0:57:51.440
<v Speaker 2>and the president. Yeah, very nice.

0:57:51.640 --> 0:57:53.640
<v Speaker 3>But does it really well too? It wouldn't be like

0:57:53.720 --> 0:57:55.360
<v Speaker 3>if I did it where you could clearly just see

0:57:55.520 --> 0:57:58.320
<v Speaker 3>like two photos slap together like he actually blends it in.

0:57:58.400 --> 0:57:59.120
<v Speaker 3>It makes it look good.

0:57:59.520 --> 0:58:01.840
<v Speaker 2>Maybe they do one of like a young le Ls

0:58:02.560 --> 0:58:05.080
<v Speaker 2>and old playing each other like you see that MJ

0:58:05.240 --> 0:58:07.800
<v Speaker 2>one every once in a while, right, Like ye'd be awesome.

0:58:08.160 --> 0:58:12.280
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, reach out Ty Winter in the stream team, says

0:58:12.480 --> 0:58:14.920
<v Speaker 5>Joel Anthony. That's who I was thinking. It does look

0:58:15.000 --> 0:58:19.440
<v Speaker 5>Oh the rear the rear head of Canadian Joel Anthony

0:58:21.920 --> 0:58:22.720
<v Speaker 5>in the rear head.

0:58:24.560 --> 0:58:28.200
<v Speaker 2>Okay, amazing. Well those are our winners and losers of

0:58:28.320 --> 0:58:30.640
<v Speaker 2>the weekend. I'm sure we miss some, so you let

0:58:30.720 --> 0:58:32.320
<v Speaker 2>us know in the YouTube comments. Let us know right

0:58:32.320 --> 0:58:34.600
<v Speaker 2>now if you're the stream teamers or tweet us at

0:58:34.640 --> 0:58:36.919
<v Speaker 2>No dunk stake a little bit of news, guys before

0:58:36.960 --> 0:58:39.160
<v Speaker 2>we start wrapping this up. The Brooklyn Nets will have

0:58:39.240 --> 0:58:42.160
<v Speaker 2>some extra cash to use to try and sign or

0:58:42.240 --> 0:58:44.840
<v Speaker 2>trade for an additional player because the league granted their

0:58:44.920 --> 0:58:49.880
<v Speaker 2>application for a five point seven million disabled player exception

0:58:50.520 --> 0:58:53.480
<v Speaker 2>for Spencer Dinwiddie, who is of course out for the

0:58:53.560 --> 0:58:55.920
<v Speaker 2>rest of the season. Tasks, where are they going to go?

0:58:56.040 --> 0:58:57.080
<v Speaker 2>What are they how are they going to put this

0:58:57.160 --> 0:58:57.800
<v Speaker 2>money to use?

0:58:57.880 --> 0:59:00.720
<v Speaker 5>Man, Well, I'll say first and formal. People want to

0:59:00.760 --> 0:59:03.720
<v Speaker 5>play with the Brooklyn Nets when they see those three

0:59:03.760 --> 0:59:08.240
<v Speaker 5>offensive weapons, go at it. I heard Richard Jefferson, analysts

0:59:08.280 --> 0:59:10.200
<v Speaker 5>for the Brooklyn Nets, right now, talking about, well maybe

0:59:10.240 --> 0:59:11.960
<v Speaker 5>I can get out there for eighteen minutes. And you know,

0:59:12.080 --> 0:59:14.640
<v Speaker 5>Richard Jefferson is a joker, but I think deep down

0:59:14.720 --> 0:59:17.600
<v Speaker 5>he's thinking what a lot of veteran NBA players are thinking.

0:59:17.920 --> 0:59:20.600
<v Speaker 5>I could go play with those dudes. And speaking of

0:59:21.080 --> 0:59:24.240
<v Speaker 5>you know former players that kind of look like Shaquille O'Neil,

0:59:24.320 --> 0:59:26.960
<v Speaker 5>kind of look like Joel Anthony from the back, Dwayne

0:59:27.040 --> 0:59:29.680
<v Speaker 5>Deadman is available. I know he I know, maybe he's

0:59:30.200 --> 0:59:34.480
<v Speaker 5>you know, not your rim alter that you desire. You know,

0:59:34.560 --> 0:59:36.600
<v Speaker 5>he is more of a but he's a tough guy.

0:59:36.880 --> 0:59:40.480
<v Speaker 5>He is very tough. He's willing to lay the hammer

0:59:40.560 --> 0:59:42.640
<v Speaker 5>down when need be. That's what the Brooklyn Nets want.

0:59:42.720 --> 0:59:46.000
<v Speaker 5>That's what Kevin Durant is yelling at Reggie Perry every time.

0:59:46.120 --> 0:59:48.560
<v Speaker 5>Come on that. DeAndre Jordans like he just wants a

0:59:48.920 --> 0:59:51.360
<v Speaker 5>you know, a real physical guy in the lane. So

0:59:51.480 --> 0:59:54.440
<v Speaker 5>Dwayne Deadmon could be a guy. And I'm sure anybody

0:59:54.520 --> 0:59:58.160
<v Speaker 5>would want to play with those guys. I'm not. The

0:59:58.280 --> 1:00:00.120
<v Speaker 5>thing is, you got to go get a big and

1:00:00.240 --> 1:00:04.440
<v Speaker 5>you you probably want another wing defender because Kevin Durant

1:00:04.520 --> 1:00:07.480
<v Speaker 5>is having to do so much against the big wing defenders.

1:00:07.560 --> 1:00:10.680
<v Speaker 5>That seems like every team has there. They got a

1:00:10.720 --> 1:00:11.800
<v Speaker 5>couple of needs out there.

1:00:12.120 --> 1:00:16.200
<v Speaker 2>Well, they recently signed free to forward Norvel Pell right,

1:00:16.560 --> 1:00:19.240
<v Speaker 2>the Nets did to help the front court. But you're

1:00:19.280 --> 1:00:22.680
<v Speaker 2>you're right, I mean, Denman, I think is available. Randy

1:00:22.760 --> 1:00:25.280
<v Speaker 2>Hollis Jefferson is available to right, so he could be had,

1:00:26.080 --> 1:00:28.320
<v Speaker 2>but those guys or yeah, in fact check me on that.

1:00:28.360 --> 1:00:30.680
<v Speaker 2>I think he is though, but those guys could be

1:00:30.760 --> 1:00:33.080
<v Speaker 2>sort of had for I would assume the minimum if

1:00:33.080 --> 1:00:35.960
<v Speaker 2>they're not on a roster. So will they wait with

1:00:36.120 --> 1:00:38.920
<v Speaker 2>this dpe to use that, you know, which is obviously

1:00:39.000 --> 1:00:40.880
<v Speaker 2>a much more good chunk of money to use on

1:00:41.040 --> 1:00:43.200
<v Speaker 2>someone that comes out in the buyout candidate market and

1:00:43.200 --> 1:00:46.040
<v Speaker 2>stuff like that, or in a trade, you know, for

1:00:46.280 --> 1:00:48.560
<v Speaker 2>like a McGee. We talked about JaVale McGee as possibility

1:00:48.680 --> 1:00:50.760
<v Speaker 2>or like, I don't know, can Biambo be in play

1:00:50.840 --> 1:00:52.880
<v Speaker 2>there or something like that, Ed Davis, I know his

1:00:53.000 --> 1:00:55.400
<v Speaker 2>name has been thrown around or maybe, like you said,

1:00:55.440 --> 1:00:56.840
<v Speaker 2>task like a wing guy. I love the idea of

1:00:56.840 --> 1:00:59.120
<v Speaker 2>them getting Rondy Hollis Jefferson back on the nets. I

1:00:59.200 --> 1:01:00.760
<v Speaker 2>think that makes a lot of sense. He'd give you

1:01:01.040 --> 1:01:03.480
<v Speaker 2>some defensive presence. No, Tree, you don't think so a

1:01:03.520 --> 1:01:03.840
<v Speaker 2>little bit.

1:01:04.120 --> 1:01:05.840
<v Speaker 4>I think they're done with him. I think most troubles

1:01:05.840 --> 1:01:07.720
<v Speaker 4>are done with him. If a team wanted him for defense,

1:01:07.760 --> 1:01:09.840
<v Speaker 4>that should have been the Minnesota Timberwolves who had him,

1:01:09.920 --> 1:01:12.240
<v Speaker 4>and they just said no. The worry I would have

1:01:12.800 --> 1:01:14.960
<v Speaker 4>is it seems like Jabealo McGee would be the perfect candidate.

1:01:15.040 --> 1:01:17.040
<v Speaker 4>But are there enough basketballs to go around? Did you

1:01:17.080 --> 1:01:20.560
<v Speaker 4>see Jamiel handling the ball on the fast break this weekend?

1:01:21.080 --> 1:01:23.160
<v Speaker 4>I don't know if Steve Nash is gonna be able

1:01:23.160 --> 1:01:26.080
<v Speaker 4>to find touches for four elite ball handlers out there tray.

1:01:26.400 --> 1:01:27.840
<v Speaker 2>That was Javal McGee.

1:01:27.960 --> 1:01:28.280
<v Speaker 3>What he did.

1:01:28.320 --> 1:01:31.560
<v Speaker 2>This was Trey Kirby at the pickup runs. It took

1:01:31.600 --> 1:01:34.120
<v Speaker 2>me back, It made me long to play hoops agains

1:01:34.240 --> 1:01:37.560
<v Speaker 2>like oh Man every once every Wednesday night. That would

1:01:37.600 --> 1:01:39.760
<v Speaker 2>be a Trey Kirby Jabal McGee like fast freak where

1:01:39.800 --> 1:01:40.720
<v Speaker 2>he's getting fancy with.

1:01:40.800 --> 1:01:44.360
<v Speaker 4>It, rumbling bumbling, stumbling down the court. If you get

1:01:44.480 --> 1:01:46.919
<v Speaker 4>a rebound, is a big guy at the free throw line,

1:01:47.080 --> 1:01:50.480
<v Speaker 4>it is your obligation to take it the full length

1:01:50.520 --> 1:01:52.960
<v Speaker 4>of the clurk coast to coast and finish with a

1:01:53.040 --> 1:01:53.720
<v Speaker 4>ridiculous shot.

1:01:53.800 --> 1:01:56.560
<v Speaker 3>What are resurgence for Javal McGee's career. A couple of

1:01:56.640 --> 1:01:59.320
<v Speaker 3>years ago out of the league, completely wins a couple

1:01:59.360 --> 1:02:01.800
<v Speaker 3>of championship with the Worries, one of the Lakers, and

1:02:01.920 --> 1:02:06.080
<v Speaker 3>now he's a fun uh impactful vet on the Cats.

1:02:06.200 --> 1:02:07.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's just incredible.

1:02:07.640 --> 1:02:09.560
<v Speaker 3>This guy he was he was just a clown there

1:02:09.600 --> 1:02:10.880
<v Speaker 3>for a couple of years, and now it's just like

1:02:11.040 --> 1:02:13.600
<v Speaker 3>he's fun to watch and he plays well and it's

1:02:13.640 --> 1:02:15.640
<v Speaker 3>great for the Nets to have, for the Cats to

1:02:15.680 --> 1:02:16.840
<v Speaker 3>have him on that team.

1:02:17.120 --> 1:02:19.680
<v Speaker 2>And his name comes up on our podcast every second

1:02:19.760 --> 1:02:21.880
<v Speaker 2>day because we keep talking about, like, oh, Juelle McGee

1:02:21.920 --> 1:02:23.920
<v Speaker 2>could be had any I don't wonder who could get him.

1:02:24.240 --> 1:02:26.400
<v Speaker 4>It's like shades of twenty twelve to me. I feel

1:02:26.440 --> 1:02:28.320
<v Speaker 4>like at the trade deadline that year, we talked about

1:02:28.440 --> 1:02:32.200
<v Speaker 4>Ramon Sessions non stop. We're like, oh man, this is

1:02:32.320 --> 1:02:34.240
<v Speaker 4>it for the Lakers, this is what they've needed the

1:02:34.320 --> 1:02:37.080
<v Speaker 4>whole time, somebody to run that second unit. We're talking

1:02:37.120 --> 1:02:40.640
<v Speaker 4>about JaVale McGhee here, the veteran leader, but honestly, he

1:02:40.640 --> 1:02:41.680
<v Speaker 4>would help the Nets the.

1:02:41.720 --> 1:02:43.360
<v Speaker 5>Non Sessions had a twenty assist game.

1:02:43.880 --> 1:02:46.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, he had a forty point game too. I think

1:02:46.680 --> 1:02:49.480
<v Speaker 3>Sessions he was just the hottest thing in fantasy. The

1:02:49.600 --> 1:02:51.440
<v Speaker 3>following season was like get Ramon Session.

1:02:51.520 --> 1:02:51.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

1:02:51.720 --> 1:02:55.120
<v Speaker 5>I was like, Nah, twenty boards is roast beef. What

1:02:55.160 --> 1:02:56.160
<v Speaker 5>would twenty assists be?

1:02:57.680 --> 1:03:00.760
<v Speaker 2>That's a good question, great question saved. Think it over,

1:03:00.880 --> 1:03:02.880
<v Speaker 2>think it over for tray, have something tomorrow.

1:03:03.080 --> 1:03:05.920
<v Speaker 4>I'm not a passer task. There's ale to come up

1:03:05.960 --> 1:03:06.640
<v Speaker 4>with something like this.

1:03:09.640 --> 1:03:11.840
<v Speaker 2>All right, let's get to tweet of the night.

1:03:14.080 --> 1:03:15.080
<v Speaker 5>Tweet of the night.

1:03:15.880 --> 1:03:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Wow.

1:03:19.360 --> 1:03:23.160
<v Speaker 2>JD my man coming through always with the Monday tweet

1:03:23.320 --> 1:03:24.640
<v Speaker 2>of the night. Yet all weekend?

1:03:24.840 --> 1:03:26.160
<v Speaker 6>Which got your hat all weekend?

1:03:26.240 --> 1:03:26.560
<v Speaker 5>It can't.

1:03:26.600 --> 1:03:29.080
<v Speaker 6>It comes from yesterday actually, and it was the big

1:03:29.280 --> 1:03:32.880
<v Speaker 6>story on everyone's mind is that the stage has been

1:03:33.000 --> 1:03:35.480
<v Speaker 6>set for an epic showdown and it's one we've all

1:03:35.560 --> 1:03:39.760
<v Speaker 6>been waiting for. We have a literal clash of titans coming.

1:03:40.160 --> 1:03:43.680
<v Speaker 6>People are comparing it to Lebron versus Jordan in the

1:03:43.840 --> 1:03:47.320
<v Speaker 6>NBA finals. I saw this quote on CNN. It's the

1:03:47.440 --> 1:03:51.160
<v Speaker 6>meeting of the goat and his potential successor, and the

1:03:51.320 --> 1:03:54.400
<v Speaker 6>fans are salivating at the prospect.

1:03:55.200 --> 1:03:55.320
<v Speaker 7>Uh.

1:03:55.920 --> 1:03:59.640
<v Speaker 6>I'm of course talking of God's Illa versus calm Be.

1:04:00.360 --> 1:04:04.160
<v Speaker 6>The trailer dropped this weekend and uh, you know, I

1:04:04.280 --> 1:04:07.480
<v Speaker 6>mean people are pumped. It's the King of Monsters versus

1:04:07.640 --> 1:04:13.720
<v Speaker 6>the King of Kong's I guess King Kong. And there

1:04:13.800 --> 1:04:16.480
<v Speaker 6>is an NBI a tie in here because Kevin Durant

1:04:16.800 --> 1:04:21.280
<v Speaker 6>already calling it. I can't see Godzilla losing this match.

1:04:21.600 --> 1:04:26.200
<v Speaker 2>I mean, yeah, but what did Katie think would Gregor

1:04:26.280 --> 1:04:27.120
<v Speaker 2>fight heading in? Oh?

1:04:27.800 --> 1:04:30.400
<v Speaker 6>Oh, that's a good, good question. I don't know, that's

1:04:30.440 --> 1:04:33.840
<v Speaker 6>a bold prediction. I mean, Rebecca Hall, one of the

1:04:33.880 --> 1:04:35.920
<v Speaker 6>actresses in the film, is she says it right in

1:04:35.960 --> 1:04:37.720
<v Speaker 6>the trailer, Kong bows to know what?

1:04:38.880 --> 1:04:41.160
<v Speaker 5>So, I mean that doesn't mean he's gonna win.

1:04:42.520 --> 1:04:45.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I guess, well, who would you who would you

1:04:45.760 --> 1:04:47.040
<v Speaker 2>favor in this matchup? Oh?

1:04:47.120 --> 1:04:51.520
<v Speaker 6>I know I'm going Kong for sure, going, I'm going Wow.

1:04:51.680 --> 1:04:54.919
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean it makes sense, like not having any

1:04:54.960 --> 1:04:57.880
<v Speaker 2>idea what the actual story is, but like Kong is

1:04:58.000 --> 1:05:03.200
<v Speaker 2>sort of like, oh, like Earth's right, did we make

1:05:03.280 --> 1:05:05.560
<v Speaker 2>cong I don't know, I don't know. Anyway, he feels

1:05:05.600 --> 1:05:08.160
<v Speaker 2>like he's on our side more than Godzilla. This like

1:05:08.600 --> 1:05:10.840
<v Speaker 2>you know, Monster from the Sea.

1:05:10.920 --> 1:05:14.200
<v Speaker 6>I guess you're right right by nuclear weapons, you know.

1:05:14.400 --> 1:05:18.240
<v Speaker 6>But the but Godzilla was sort of a good guy

1:05:18.320 --> 1:05:20.560
<v Speaker 6>in the end, wasn't he in the last film? I

1:05:20.680 --> 1:05:23.960
<v Speaker 6>mean I can't remember. I think he was defending mankind

1:05:24.280 --> 1:05:27.000
<v Speaker 6>and now and now I guess Godzilla is the bad

1:05:27.080 --> 1:05:30.200
<v Speaker 6>guy if you live long enough to be the hero,

1:05:30.440 --> 1:05:31.360
<v Speaker 6>you become the villain.

1:05:31.440 --> 1:05:31.880
<v Speaker 5>Was that?

1:05:32.000 --> 1:05:32.320
<v Speaker 3>How good?

1:05:32.480 --> 1:05:33.040
<v Speaker 7>Something like that?

1:05:33.240 --> 1:05:33.439
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

1:05:34.440 --> 1:05:38.000
<v Speaker 6>And then a quick addition here, since we were taught

1:05:38.000 --> 1:05:41.840
<v Speaker 6>we were talking nicknames earlier and big dumb movies. The

1:05:41.920 --> 1:05:46.600
<v Speaker 6>Athletics own Chris Kirshner with this hot news yesterday, John

1:05:46.680 --> 1:05:50.240
<v Speaker 6>Collins shared that the Hawks training staff has given D'Angelo

1:05:50.400 --> 1:05:53.040
<v Speaker 6>Hunter the nick megatron DeAndre.

1:05:52.760 --> 1:05:54.680
<v Speaker 2>Sorry, what did I say, D'Angelo?

1:05:55.480 --> 1:05:57.880
<v Speaker 6>Did I say D'Angelo? I'm literally reading it and the

1:06:00.280 --> 1:06:05.480
<v Speaker 6>terrible at this I don't anyway, uh, he quickly corrected.

1:06:06.440 --> 1:06:10.800
<v Speaker 6>It's actually he wants to be called optimists, not Megatron,

1:06:11.440 --> 1:06:14.600
<v Speaker 6>So Megatron's better though, No, I mean.

1:06:14.520 --> 1:06:18.479
<v Speaker 2>Well, yeah, but Megatron was the nickname of a wide

1:06:18.480 --> 1:06:22.160
<v Speaker 2>receiver at Calvin Johnson Football, So maybe it's like, has

1:06:22.200 --> 1:06:23.560
<v Speaker 2>there been an Optimist before?

1:06:23.760 --> 1:06:26.640
<v Speaker 6>I don't know there was? There was a Grimes, wasn't

1:06:26.680 --> 1:06:28.880
<v Speaker 6>there optimist? Crime?

1:06:29.040 --> 1:06:29.160
<v Speaker 5>Is that?

1:06:29.360 --> 1:06:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Is that a?

1:06:29.880 --> 1:06:30.840
<v Speaker 6>Is that a basketball player?

1:06:30.840 --> 1:06:34.160
<v Speaker 4>I think John Wall was optimist dime on basketball?

1:06:34.640 --> 1:06:36.480
<v Speaker 7>Oh, yeah, you're right, Yeah.

1:06:36.520 --> 1:06:37.840
<v Speaker 4>Maybe he just doesn't want to be the bad guy

1:06:38.000 --> 1:06:40.920
<v Speaker 4>DeAndre Hunter. Let D'Angelo Hunter be Megatron.

1:06:43.040 --> 1:06:44.800
<v Speaker 2>Well who do you just to circle back? Who do

1:06:44.880 --> 1:06:48.240
<v Speaker 2>you like in the Godzilla versus Calm matchup, lely.

1:06:50.000 --> 1:06:55.240
<v Speaker 3>Well, I mean, if you're talking a crocodile of us

1:06:55.400 --> 1:07:02.200
<v Speaker 3>is as if it's on land, I mean, I guess

1:07:02.280 --> 1:07:04.920
<v Speaker 3>the eight can can get on top of him and

1:07:05.360 --> 1:07:06.240
<v Speaker 3>do the business there.

1:07:06.560 --> 1:07:09.919
<v Speaker 2>Okay, you're like the like calm with a submission what round?

1:07:10.600 --> 1:07:13.200
<v Speaker 3>That's probably what I'm saying. But if it's near the water,

1:07:13.480 --> 1:07:16.280
<v Speaker 3>then the crocodile I think can take care of him,

1:07:16.440 --> 1:07:18.720
<v Speaker 3>you know, So I think it favors which which home

1:07:18.800 --> 1:07:20.120
<v Speaker 3>ground advantage you have there?

1:07:21.080 --> 1:07:21.480
<v Speaker 5>What if?

1:07:21.640 --> 1:07:23.760
<v Speaker 6>What if the crocodile can breathe fire?

1:07:26.920 --> 1:07:30.880
<v Speaker 3>That's that that adds a new element I'll say, Yeah,

1:07:31.160 --> 1:07:33.320
<v Speaker 3>I mean, like, get a hippo in there. Anyway, hippo

1:07:33.360 --> 1:07:37.000
<v Speaker 3>would do the damage on both of those in a second. Hippos,

1:07:37.240 --> 1:07:39.320
<v Speaker 3>you know, quick enough, strong enough can go on land,

1:07:39.360 --> 1:07:42.040
<v Speaker 3>can go on water. So I hope there's a I

1:07:42.120 --> 1:07:44.320
<v Speaker 3>hope whoever wins this in the next in the sequel

1:07:44.360 --> 1:07:45.640
<v Speaker 3>takes on the hippo for the world.

1:07:45.880 --> 1:07:50.400
<v Speaker 2>For the undisputed total. Yeah, the hippo's just waiting training exactly.

1:07:50.880 --> 1:07:53.840
<v Speaker 3>It comes out wipe those two in a second.

1:07:55.400 --> 1:07:57.320
<v Speaker 2>Leave it till Lee for me to ask him, who

1:07:57.360 --> 1:07:59.400
<v Speaker 2>does he like in a God delivers is Calm match

1:07:59.480 --> 1:08:05.920
<v Speaker 2>up to see, I'm like the hippo incredible, always amaze.

1:08:06.440 --> 1:08:08.600
<v Speaker 2>All right, pick the results from Friday night. It was

1:08:08.680 --> 1:08:11.480
<v Speaker 2>the Nets Calves game. The Nets were favored by nine

1:08:11.520 --> 1:08:13.920
<v Speaker 2>and a half, had to win big, but the Calves

1:08:14.000 --> 1:08:16.000
<v Speaker 2>got the victory. We probably would have had the Caves

1:08:16.000 --> 1:08:18.160
<v Speaker 2>as a winner of the weekend if they didn't follow

1:08:18.280 --> 1:08:20.719
<v Speaker 2>up their performance are on Friday Night by getting absolutely

1:08:20.840 --> 1:08:23.240
<v Speaker 2>slacked by Gelen Brown and the Celtics there on Sunday.

1:08:23.439 --> 1:08:26.679
<v Speaker 2>But anyway, good victory for Ley. You're nine and twelve.

1:08:26.680 --> 1:08:28.240
<v Speaker 2>You had the Calves to cover and they got the victory.

1:08:28.280 --> 1:08:30.120
<v Speaker 2>Like I said, so you're nine and twelve. Everybody else

1:08:30.160 --> 1:08:32.519
<v Speaker 2>had the Nets. Everybody else got a loss. Tray's nine

1:08:32.560 --> 1:08:34.840
<v Speaker 2>and twelve. Tass Is eight and thirteen. He's currently in

1:08:34.920 --> 1:08:37.640
<v Speaker 2>last place, and I'm eleven and ten. A lot of

1:08:37.680 --> 1:08:39.479
<v Speaker 2>games on tonight. Tasks which one we pick him from.

1:08:40.479 --> 1:08:44.640
<v Speaker 5>We're going to the Celtics and the Bulls. The Celtics

1:08:44.720 --> 1:08:47.439
<v Speaker 5>won by nearly forty on Sunday against the Calves. Chicago

1:08:47.520 --> 1:08:49.840
<v Speaker 5>has won three of four, though, so you think this

1:08:50.000 --> 1:08:52.160
<v Speaker 5>line would be a little bit smaller than it is

1:08:52.240 --> 1:08:54.719
<v Speaker 5>at seven and a half, but the Bulls are getting

1:08:54.840 --> 1:08:58.200
<v Speaker 5>seven and a half points, can lose by seven or less. Right,

1:08:58.240 --> 1:09:00.599
<v Speaker 5>what do you think about that? You think are coming

1:09:00.640 --> 1:09:01.160
<v Speaker 5>out straw?

1:09:01.720 --> 1:09:01.920
<v Speaker 6>Oh?

1:09:02.240 --> 1:09:05.160
<v Speaker 4>Of course, tassy, that's way too big a line against

1:09:05.240 --> 1:09:08.120
<v Speaker 4>the Chicago Bulls. Who has my good friend Tom Poro

1:09:08.320 --> 1:09:11.960
<v Speaker 4>messaged me over the weekend are one hundred percent back.

1:09:12.200 --> 1:09:13.920
<v Speaker 4>If you've got a yoga mat, you need to roll

1:09:14.000 --> 1:09:17.840
<v Speaker 4>it out, laid down, check out the game with your

1:09:17.960 --> 1:09:21.040
<v Speaker 4>no dunks, immacula items. The Bulls are back. They're keeping

1:09:21.120 --> 1:09:25.320
<v Speaker 4>this one close and they're taking the wh.

1:09:25.120 --> 1:09:27.160
<v Speaker 5>Is that Tommy Porol lying down there beside you?

1:09:27.439 --> 1:09:28.479
<v Speaker 4>That's right, that's right.

1:09:29.000 --> 1:09:31.479
<v Speaker 5>Maybe he should get up and put his Christmas tree away.

1:09:31.520 --> 1:09:34.120
<v Speaker 5>Come on, it's time man.

1:09:34.200 --> 1:09:40.559
<v Speaker 4>Jeez Tommy, he's a festive man, celebrate year round.

1:09:40.920 --> 1:09:42.840
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so you got the Bulls to cover obviously, you

1:09:42.920 --> 1:09:45.320
<v Speaker 2>and Tommy Porol. What do you got, lely?

1:09:46.160 --> 1:09:48.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, the Bulls were back until they ran into the Lakers,

1:09:48.960 --> 1:09:52.560
<v Speaker 3>but they kept that one close enough too. Umm. No

1:09:53.040 --> 1:09:56.320
<v Speaker 3>kemball Walker tonight, but Jason Tatum is back to the Celtics. Ooh,

1:09:56.880 --> 1:10:01.120
<v Speaker 3>I the Bulls can cover though. I give me Chicago, Okay,

1:10:01.360 --> 1:10:02.120
<v Speaker 3>tasks go ahead.

1:10:03.280 --> 1:10:07.400
<v Speaker 5>I'm joining Tommy, joining Trey, I'm joining Lee. Give me

1:10:07.479 --> 1:10:08.040
<v Speaker 5>the bulls.

1:10:09.240 --> 1:10:12.120
<v Speaker 2>I'll swerve. Let's make this interesting. I'll take the Celtics.

1:10:12.360 --> 1:10:15.680
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, dominant performance there on Sunday. Why can't they

1:10:15.720 --> 1:10:17.760
<v Speaker 2>do it again? That's excited to hear Jason Tatums back

1:10:17.760 --> 1:10:19.400
<v Speaker 2>in the mix there too. That could help. So I'll

1:10:19.439 --> 1:10:21.120
<v Speaker 2>take the Celtics to win my eight. It's big line,

1:10:21.200 --> 1:10:23.160
<v Speaker 2>feels a little big. I'm with you on that one.

1:10:23.200 --> 1:10:26.920
<v Speaker 2>But everybody else has the bulls. Tommy poros bulls to cover.

1:10:27.600 --> 1:10:30.400
<v Speaker 2>Put the tree away, Tommy actually put my Christmas stuff

1:10:30.400 --> 1:10:33.040
<v Speaker 2>away yesterday, had already taken it down, but it had

1:10:33.040 --> 1:10:35.559
<v Speaker 2>it all boxed up, just in the spare room, got

1:10:35.640 --> 1:10:38.920
<v Speaker 2>it in the crawl space yesterday. Guys. It's finally out

1:10:38.960 --> 1:10:42.800
<v Speaker 2>of sight, out of mind. But yeah, you're gonna get

1:10:42.800 --> 1:10:44.600
<v Speaker 2>you got your trade down, Lely, I assume you do.

1:10:44.880 --> 1:10:47.800
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah, yeah, it's so much fun putting the tree up.

1:10:47.880 --> 1:10:50.600
<v Speaker 3>But then like by January second with it is like

1:10:50.680 --> 1:10:52.519
<v Speaker 3>get these tree out of my face. I said, I

1:10:52.520 --> 1:10:54.160
<v Speaker 3>want to move on from Christmas right away.

1:10:54.560 --> 1:10:56.120
<v Speaker 5>Wow, what are you moving on too?

1:10:56.240 --> 1:10:56.400
<v Speaker 2>Though?

1:10:56.720 --> 1:10:56.920
<v Speaker 7>Yeah?

1:10:58.280 --> 1:11:04.000
<v Speaker 2>Like no, it's just what you lead us to roxy

1:11:04.080 --> 1:11:05.480
<v Speaker 2>when this January.

1:11:06.439 --> 1:11:08.880
<v Speaker 3>Because it's it feels like sometimes that tree could be

1:11:09.000 --> 1:11:11.439
<v Speaker 3>up until like now, you know, like January twenty or something.

1:11:11.439 --> 1:11:13.519
<v Speaker 2>You're like, oh, we've had friends of kept our tree

1:11:13.560 --> 1:11:16.120
<v Speaker 2>up till like June to the brown.

1:11:17.040 --> 1:11:18.960
<v Speaker 3>Subscribe, move on from it.

1:11:19.080 --> 1:11:22.960
<v Speaker 2>You know that's a nice looking thing though sometimes Okay,

1:11:23.000 --> 1:11:24.840
<v Speaker 2>I guess you're not very festive. That's fine, No, we

1:11:24.920 --> 1:11:25.479
<v Speaker 2>are festive.

1:11:25.600 --> 1:11:28.240
<v Speaker 3>Wallet's Christmas, but after the New Year's once New Years

1:11:28.320 --> 1:11:29.200
<v Speaker 3>hit boom, move on.

1:11:29.640 --> 1:11:33.360
<v Speaker 2>Okay, great, well well let's wrap it up then let's

1:11:33.400 --> 1:11:35.560
<v Speaker 2>move on. No, you know this is like turn it

1:11:35.600 --> 1:11:38.439
<v Speaker 2>into Christmas here on this podcast is keep emailing your

1:11:38.520 --> 1:11:40.160
<v Speaker 2>questions and comments in for our next beach step in

1:11:40.200 --> 1:11:42.840
<v Speaker 2>podcast No Dunks at the Athletic dot com. Like comment,

1:11:42.880 --> 1:11:44.800
<v Speaker 2>subscribe to No Dunks on YouTube, grab your No Dunks

1:11:44.840 --> 1:11:46.479
<v Speaker 2>merchan at no dunks dot com and subscribe to the

1:11:46.520 --> 1:11:49.920
<v Speaker 2>Athletic for three ninety nine a month right now. Go

1:11:50.040 --> 1:11:52.400
<v Speaker 2>to the Athletic dot com slash no dunks to sign

1:11:52.520 --> 1:11:55.400
<v Speaker 2>up so they know that we sent you fun show

1:11:55.439 --> 1:11:58.120
<v Speaker 2>here on a Monday. We'll be back on Tuesday with

1:11:58.640 --> 1:12:00.800
<v Speaker 2>what you need to know from tasking Early in the morning,

1:12:01.040 --> 1:12:03.280
<v Speaker 2>and then the Daily Show. Clipper Bros.

1:12:03.640 --> 1:12:06.240
<v Speaker 4>You heard it here first, have a great time, turn up.

1:12:06.439 --> 1:12:09.680
<v Speaker 5>Love you guys awesome, Thank you so much for joining us.

1:12:09.720 --> 1:12:12.800
<v Speaker 5>And remember the strong maple tree has sat Trey's friend

1:12:12.880 --> 1:12:15.800
<v Speaker 5>has a last name Poro, and I'm thirsty, so I

1:12:15.840 --> 1:12:18.519
<v Speaker 5>would love both those things in a sap porrow.

1:12:21.880 --> 1:12:22.200
<v Speaker 3>Whatever.

1:12:25.479 --> 1:12:28.280
<v Speaker 2>Wow was, Embrace the day, baby.

1:12:28.920 --> 1:12:29.879
<v Speaker 6>You could stay.

1:12:31.720 --> 1:12:32.559
<v Speaker 2>Every day.

1:12:34.200 --> 1:12:36.599
<v Speaker 6>And Aggie happy every minute.

1:12:39.640 --> 1:12:46.360
<v Speaker 2>It's been so long that YO wanna wait, It's happened already.

1:12:47.880 --> 1:12:49.120
<v Speaker 5>It's gonna be grevy