1 00:00:00,800 --> 00:00:04,040 Speaker 1: Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney alongside 2 00:00:04,040 --> 00:00:06,920 Speaker 1: my co host Matt Miller. Every business day we bring 3 00:00:06,960 --> 00:00:11,520 Speaker 1: you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along 4 00:00:11,560 --> 00:00:15,600 Speaker 1: with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast 5 00:00:15,600 --> 00:00:18,479 Speaker 1: on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and 6 00:00:18,480 --> 00:00:22,080 Speaker 1: at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. All right, I think 7 00:00:22,079 --> 00:00:26,480 Speaker 1: the topic of the day, slash week, slash month is inflation. 8 00:00:26,960 --> 00:00:30,640 Speaker 1: I think the transitory arguments kind of halfway out the window, 9 00:00:30,680 --> 00:00:32,919 Speaker 1: all the way out of the window, but the investors 10 00:00:32,960 --> 00:00:34,920 Speaker 1: are still trying to get a handle on that. Let's 11 00:00:34,960 --> 00:00:37,279 Speaker 1: check in with the professional, get his thoughts on Esta 12 00:00:37,360 --> 00:00:41,600 Speaker 1: Ramo's Chief investment Officer b MO Global Asset Management in 13 00:00:41,640 --> 00:00:43,680 Speaker 1: the US or now. So, thanks so much for joining 14 00:00:43,760 --> 00:00:46,760 Speaker 1: us here. Let's start with inflation because it's everywhere and 15 00:00:46,800 --> 00:00:48,720 Speaker 1: we we just got through a big earning season where 16 00:00:49,080 --> 00:00:51,519 Speaker 1: it was certainly one of the most talked about topics 17 00:00:51,560 --> 00:00:54,320 Speaker 1: on the conference calls. How do you think about the 18 00:00:54,360 --> 00:00:57,000 Speaker 1: inflationary environment we're in today and how does that color 19 00:00:57,120 --> 00:01:02,280 Speaker 1: your investment look? Thank you for having me um inflation 20 00:01:02,800 --> 00:01:06,680 Speaker 1: we believe might actually not be as persistent as some 21 00:01:06,720 --> 00:01:10,440 Speaker 1: people expect. There's a couple of reasons for that. Number One, 22 00:01:10,480 --> 00:01:13,360 Speaker 1: you have strong base effects. In other words, once you 23 00:01:13,400 --> 00:01:17,880 Speaker 1: have inflation ramping up as much as it has by now, 24 00:01:18,520 --> 00:01:22,160 Speaker 1: but compares get easier, you can't have I mean you could, 25 00:01:22,360 --> 00:01:24,080 Speaker 1: we saw it in the seventies. You can't at ten 26 00:01:24,480 --> 00:01:28,160 Speaker 1: temper cent temper cent stacking up year over year unless 27 00:01:28,200 --> 00:01:31,960 Speaker 1: something dramatic has changed the economy. We think a lot 28 00:01:32,040 --> 00:01:35,120 Speaker 1: of the inflationary pressures we see right now are derived 29 00:01:35,120 --> 00:01:39,560 Speaker 1: from COVID and COVID after effects, supply chain disruptions that 30 00:01:39,600 --> 00:01:42,720 Speaker 1: are the result of COVID lockdowns, and other things like that, 31 00:01:43,120 --> 00:01:46,000 Speaker 1: and all of those will be in the process or 32 00:01:46,080 --> 00:01:49,000 Speaker 1: are already in the process of resolving themselves. So I 33 00:01:49,000 --> 00:01:52,640 Speaker 1: wouldn't be surprised if we start to see inflation come 34 00:01:52,760 --> 00:01:57,080 Speaker 1: off of these high levels and perhaps into two end 35 00:01:57,160 --> 00:02:01,040 Speaker 1: up in the maybe two to four range, which is 36 00:02:01,040 --> 00:02:04,000 Speaker 1: a lot lower than received right now. So it actually 37 00:02:04,080 --> 00:02:07,440 Speaker 1: might turn out to be maybe the word is not transitory, 38 00:02:07,560 --> 00:02:11,799 Speaker 1: but not a permanent six going forward for the next 39 00:02:11,840 --> 00:02:14,240 Speaker 1: couple of years to speak, well, it was, I mean 40 00:02:14,240 --> 00:02:17,480 Speaker 1: the seventies inflation was transitory. Was just that one decade 41 00:02:17,480 --> 00:02:22,720 Speaker 1: pretty much. I'm curious. I'm curious um ernesto to hear 42 00:02:23,040 --> 00:02:26,359 Speaker 1: what you think about transitory. I mean, you did UM 43 00:02:26,400 --> 00:02:28,880 Speaker 1: your undergrad and something, Matthew, I think at M I T. 44 00:02:29,120 --> 00:02:33,200 Speaker 1: And then you studied UM statistics for your PhD at Harvard. 45 00:02:33,440 --> 00:02:37,040 Speaker 1: You get PhD in statistics. Well, I think that's pretty cool. 46 00:02:37,320 --> 00:02:39,560 Speaker 1: You do well. I had one semester that in business. 47 00:02:39,560 --> 00:02:42,400 Speaker 1: One was enough. I loved I loved it. But you don't. 48 00:02:42,440 --> 00:02:45,160 Speaker 1: I'm assuming you don't really use words as vague as 49 00:02:45,200 --> 00:02:47,680 Speaker 1: transitory or do they mean something different to you than 50 00:02:47,720 --> 00:02:49,240 Speaker 1: they mean to the rest of us. What do you 51 00:02:49,240 --> 00:02:53,760 Speaker 1: what do you think about? Well, the idea, I think 52 00:02:53,800 --> 00:02:57,079 Speaker 1: positial people thought transitory was one or two months or 53 00:02:57,120 --> 00:03:02,160 Speaker 1: maybe three months of high print. Uh. I think inflation 54 00:03:02,400 --> 00:03:06,480 Speaker 1: as a as a compounding mechanism is not gonna last 55 00:03:06,520 --> 00:03:10,920 Speaker 1: more than a few months. Uh. And that's that's basically 56 00:03:10,919 --> 00:03:13,840 Speaker 1: our base case. And look, the important thing here is 57 00:03:13,880 --> 00:03:16,360 Speaker 1: not so much that inflation is going to be here 58 00:03:16,400 --> 00:03:19,760 Speaker 1: forever or not. Is the fact that nobody really knows. 59 00:03:20,080 --> 00:03:22,400 Speaker 1: There's so many things right now that nobody really knows 60 00:03:22,400 --> 00:03:25,040 Speaker 1: what it's going to look like, inflation being one of them. 61 00:03:25,280 --> 00:03:28,800 Speaker 1: Do you have a huge, a very big distribution around 62 00:03:28,960 --> 00:03:34,000 Speaker 1: the potential inflation outcomes, supply chain disruptions, fiscal policy and 63 00:03:34,080 --> 00:03:37,760 Speaker 1: monetary policy, economic growth, earnings growth, all of these things 64 00:03:37,840 --> 00:03:41,640 Speaker 1: that normally people understand or are able to forecast with 65 00:03:41,800 --> 00:03:45,000 Speaker 1: some sense of accuracy. Right now, the outcomes are all 66 00:03:45,040 --> 00:03:47,680 Speaker 1: over the place. So so what do we tell investors 67 00:03:47,760 --> 00:03:50,840 Speaker 1: right now given all of the uncertainties around all of 68 00:03:50,880 --> 00:03:56,200 Speaker 1: these potential UH disruptures or positive forces for the for 69 00:03:56,240 --> 00:03:59,880 Speaker 1: the markets. The one thing you know is that stocks 70 00:04:00,040 --> 00:04:04,120 Speaker 1: are the safest place to be, even though they're richly valued, 71 00:04:04,200 --> 00:04:08,400 Speaker 1: because everywhere else you look things are even more expensively valued, 72 00:04:08,480 --> 00:04:12,080 Speaker 1: especially bonds and let alone are more speculative assets like 73 00:04:12,120 --> 00:04:14,360 Speaker 1: cryptos and so on. So so, at the end of 74 00:04:14,360 --> 00:04:17,080 Speaker 1: the day, the one place where you can find refuges 75 00:04:17,080 --> 00:04:20,480 Speaker 1: in stocks and within stocks, do you go growth, do 76 00:04:20,600 --> 00:04:22,760 Speaker 1: you go value? To use go small cap, do you 77 00:04:23,040 --> 00:04:26,520 Speaker 1: go large gap. We're thinking that right now the sweet 78 00:04:26,520 --> 00:04:30,760 Speaker 1: spot is quality stocks, and by quality I mean low leverage, 79 00:04:30,800 --> 00:04:35,279 Speaker 1: stable learning, profitable companies that are not necessarily your highest growers, 80 00:04:35,320 --> 00:04:38,880 Speaker 1: not necessarily your your cyclical place, but companies that are 81 00:04:38,920 --> 00:04:42,360 Speaker 1: relatively immune to the to the to the cyclical forces 82 00:04:42,720 --> 00:04:46,719 Speaker 1: also relatively immune to interest rates, but will provide some 83 00:04:46,920 --> 00:04:50,360 Speaker 1: decent return given all of the uncertainties that I just mentioned, 84 00:04:50,360 --> 00:04:53,440 Speaker 1: because the world is really murky right now and we 85 00:04:53,480 --> 00:04:57,679 Speaker 1: don't know how all of these forces will resolve themselves. Na, 86 00:04:57,680 --> 00:05:00,000 Speaker 1: how do you feel about the valuation in this mark 87 00:05:00,000 --> 00:05:01,599 Speaker 1: could place? A lot of people are raising that as 88 00:05:01,640 --> 00:05:03,279 Speaker 1: a as a red flag. Yet we just had some 89 00:05:03,360 --> 00:05:06,400 Speaker 1: really strong earning, So how do you think about that? Well? Also, 90 00:05:06,600 --> 00:05:09,240 Speaker 1: if stocks are the only place to be, do you care? 91 00:05:09,320 --> 00:05:12,480 Speaker 1: Do you care? Right? Well, that's the thing. I mean. 92 00:05:12,680 --> 00:05:16,200 Speaker 1: Valuations for stocks are rich, but valuation for bonds are 93 00:05:16,279 --> 00:05:18,760 Speaker 1: we been richer, So you have to put your money somewhere. 94 00:05:18,760 --> 00:05:21,359 Speaker 1: You can't leave it in cash because of the because 95 00:05:21,400 --> 00:05:24,240 Speaker 1: of inflation. You have to put it either in bonds 96 00:05:24,320 --> 00:05:27,600 Speaker 1: or stocks. And right now stocks seem to be the 97 00:05:27,720 --> 00:05:33,359 Speaker 1: least richly values of of these highly valued areas. But 98 00:05:33,360 --> 00:05:35,880 Speaker 1: but yeah, that is the biggest risk to see in 99 00:05:35,880 --> 00:05:39,240 Speaker 1: in in in the market, in the stock market, and 100 00:05:39,240 --> 00:05:41,800 Speaker 1: in fact, I wouldn't be surprised to see some kind 101 00:05:41,800 --> 00:05:44,520 Speaker 1: of a correction here of five to tem per said move, 102 00:05:44,600 --> 00:05:47,080 Speaker 1: because we haven't had one for for quite a while. 103 00:05:47,120 --> 00:05:49,520 Speaker 1: So but that is part of investing in the stock market. 104 00:05:49,560 --> 00:05:51,560 Speaker 1: You have to put your money there, and and and 105 00:05:51,680 --> 00:05:55,520 Speaker 1: put up with occasional correction. But over the next couple 106 00:05:55,600 --> 00:05:58,560 Speaker 1: of years, we think you will be much more highly 107 00:05:58,600 --> 00:06:02,240 Speaker 1: rewarded for being stocks that for being in bonds. At 108 00:06:02,279 --> 00:06:08,040 Speaker 1: this point, what about Westchester? Real estate? Is that safe place? Well? 109 00:06:09,120 --> 00:06:13,440 Speaker 1: Real estate, food and anything you talk about has been 110 00:06:13,520 --> 00:06:17,479 Speaker 1: so inflated by by your very loose monetary conditions, which, 111 00:06:17,520 --> 00:06:20,680 Speaker 1: by the way, we think will persist because whether you 112 00:06:20,760 --> 00:06:25,400 Speaker 1: get power or or brainer, you're gonna have loose monetary policy. 113 00:06:25,680 --> 00:06:28,479 Speaker 1: So so so that part of the question is good. 114 00:06:28,600 --> 00:06:32,720 Speaker 1: But real estate is up through the roof. Alright, thank 115 00:06:32,760 --> 00:06:35,359 Speaker 1: you so much. We really appreciate our rama's chief investment officer, 116 00:06:35,680 --> 00:06:43,640 Speaker 1: BEMO Global Asset Management. Let's bring she's gonna talk rates 117 00:06:43,640 --> 00:06:45,839 Speaker 1: with his managing director and global head of rate strategy 118 00:06:45,839 --> 00:06:50,320 Speaker 1: at TV Securities. We had Bill Dudley, former New York 119 00:06:50,320 --> 00:06:52,800 Speaker 1: Fed President in current Bloomberg opinion columns. He was on 120 00:06:52,839 --> 00:06:55,960 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Television this morning kind of suggesting that maybe the 121 00:06:56,000 --> 00:07:00,240 Speaker 1: Fed is falling behind the market. Here's that really late 122 00:07:00,360 --> 00:07:04,279 Speaker 1: to rates? How do you think about that? So I 123 00:07:04,320 --> 00:07:07,400 Speaker 1: think it all comes down to the expectation of will 124 00:07:07,480 --> 00:07:10,800 Speaker 1: inflation slow down or is a being a new normal 125 00:07:10,880 --> 00:07:13,320 Speaker 1: of high inflation and labor markets lack going the way 126 00:07:13,920 --> 00:07:18,240 Speaker 1: I think Dudley's comments suggests that inflation his expectation as 127 00:07:18,280 --> 00:07:20,720 Speaker 1: inflation states high, and so the FED will have to 128 00:07:20,760 --> 00:07:24,200 Speaker 1: play catch up because they would start hiking in his 129 00:07:24,360 --> 00:07:27,320 Speaker 1: view late. We're actually taking the other side of the 130 00:07:27,520 --> 00:07:31,200 Speaker 1: argument that inflation is likely to decelerate, that there's still 131 00:07:31,280 --> 00:07:34,000 Speaker 1: plenty of labor market slack. We're dealing with the frictions 132 00:07:34,000 --> 00:07:36,120 Speaker 1: of the labor market where people have left and they 133 00:07:36,120 --> 00:07:38,680 Speaker 1: have to come back, and and so our views of 134 00:07:38,760 --> 00:07:42,200 Speaker 1: the FED hikes only in two thousand twenty three. So 135 00:07:42,600 --> 00:07:44,720 Speaker 1: the market is pretty split. I think we have a 136 00:07:44,720 --> 00:07:48,280 Speaker 1: bimodal distribution in terms of you know what what what 137 00:07:48,600 --> 00:07:51,640 Speaker 1: are the inflation dynamics the labor market dynamics, And so 138 00:07:51,720 --> 00:07:53,880 Speaker 1: you've got views of those who say that the FED 139 00:07:54,000 --> 00:07:57,640 Speaker 1: is too slow, which is Dudley's argument. We actually think 140 00:07:57,680 --> 00:08:00,560 Speaker 1: the markets pricing into early of a FED high first 141 00:08:00,640 --> 00:08:03,240 Speaker 1: hike is being priced for July twenty two, right after 142 00:08:03,720 --> 00:08:06,880 Speaker 1: tapering in. But we think by then the fiscal drag 143 00:08:07,120 --> 00:08:10,600 Speaker 1: will actually start to show up. Both with decelerating inflation 144 00:08:10,640 --> 00:08:12,960 Speaker 1: as well as growth, and think that the FED won't 145 00:08:12,960 --> 00:08:15,200 Speaker 1: be able to hike next year. So well, it's a 146 00:08:15,240 --> 00:08:19,200 Speaker 1: pretty split market right now. I mean, because the economy 147 00:08:19,240 --> 00:08:21,640 Speaker 1: doesn't look that strong enough, doesn't look strong enough to 148 00:08:21,680 --> 00:08:23,400 Speaker 1: hike into Is that what you're saying. I mean, if 149 00:08:23,400 --> 00:08:26,200 Speaker 1: they hike just to stop inflation, that's not great. They 150 00:08:26,240 --> 00:08:29,000 Speaker 1: need to have a healthy enough economy in which into 151 00:08:29,000 --> 00:08:33,280 Speaker 1: which to do it exactly, And if it's just inflation written, um, 152 00:08:33,400 --> 00:08:37,200 Speaker 1: it's not even clear that inflation will decelerate based on 153 00:08:37,280 --> 00:08:39,760 Speaker 1: Fed hikes. I mean, the way it would have to work, 154 00:08:39,760 --> 00:08:42,760 Speaker 1: if the FED would have to hike, tighten financial conditions, 155 00:08:42,760 --> 00:08:45,560 Speaker 1: slow the cormy down, and then bring inflation so through 156 00:08:45,600 --> 00:08:48,040 Speaker 1: the demand channel. But there's a lot of evidence that 157 00:08:48,080 --> 00:08:50,720 Speaker 1: this is not a demand lead inflation, this is supply lead. 158 00:08:50,880 --> 00:08:53,640 Speaker 1: So it's not even clear that FED hikes help. And 159 00:08:53,679 --> 00:08:55,760 Speaker 1: to your point, yes, if growth is starting to slow 160 00:08:55,800 --> 00:08:58,400 Speaker 1: and we think the market is underestimating the extent of 161 00:08:58,440 --> 00:09:01,280 Speaker 1: fiscal drag, go to have been so strong this year 162 00:09:01,280 --> 00:09:04,120 Speaker 1: because of massive fiscal stimulus, and even though we expect 163 00:09:04,160 --> 00:09:06,400 Speaker 1: the one and three quarters TRILLI and build back better 164 00:09:06,400 --> 00:09:09,280 Speaker 1: plan to go through. That's not a next year stimulus, 165 00:09:09,320 --> 00:09:12,000 Speaker 1: that's over the next ten years, and so there's going 166 00:09:12,040 --> 00:09:14,360 Speaker 1: to be a drag from the fiscal side, which will 167 00:09:14,400 --> 00:09:17,960 Speaker 1: start to decelerate GDP. We've got GDP decelerating to two 168 00:09:17,960 --> 00:09:19,800 Speaker 1: percent by the end of next year. So it's a 169 00:09:19,880 --> 00:09:23,600 Speaker 1: very hard environment for the FED to hike as growth 170 00:09:23,640 --> 00:09:26,280 Speaker 1: is slowing and if there's evidence that inflation seems to 171 00:09:26,280 --> 00:09:29,160 Speaker 1: have beat. So as we think about inflation, a lot 172 00:09:29,200 --> 00:09:31,200 Speaker 1: of folks are saying, you're not going to really see 173 00:09:31,440 --> 00:09:36,560 Speaker 1: long term inflation until you get wage inflation. Is wage 174 00:09:36,559 --> 00:09:40,800 Speaker 1: inflation something that we need to be on the lookout for, absolutely, 175 00:09:40,920 --> 00:09:43,400 Speaker 1: But I think we have to really dig into the 176 00:09:43,440 --> 00:09:46,360 Speaker 1: details of the wage inflation numbers. They're high right now. 177 00:09:46,679 --> 00:09:50,360 Speaker 1: But we don't think this is indicative of the labor 178 00:09:50,400 --> 00:09:52,920 Speaker 1: market slack having gone away. We think this is the 179 00:09:53,000 --> 00:09:55,120 Speaker 1: function of the fact that a lot of people left 180 00:09:55,120 --> 00:09:59,320 Speaker 1: the labor market because of COVID, because of child care reasons, 181 00:09:59,320 --> 00:10:02,200 Speaker 1: summer time ins in there as well immigration. There's a 182 00:10:02,240 --> 00:10:06,600 Speaker 1: bunch of factors that are responsible for a small labor market, 183 00:10:07,160 --> 00:10:09,680 Speaker 1: smaller labor market than it would have been. But as 184 00:10:10,280 --> 00:10:13,360 Speaker 1: the economy recovered, as we moved towards the from goods 185 00:10:13,360 --> 00:10:16,880 Speaker 1: consumption to service consumption. We think people return, and so 186 00:10:17,000 --> 00:10:19,679 Speaker 1: wage inflation numbers we actually think are going to decelerate 187 00:10:19,800 --> 00:10:22,920 Speaker 1: as more people enter the labor force, and that's what 188 00:10:23,080 --> 00:10:26,480 Speaker 1: prevents the wage price spiders. So there's a key assumption 189 00:10:26,520 --> 00:10:28,120 Speaker 1: to our call that the FED won't be able to 190 00:10:28,160 --> 00:10:31,000 Speaker 1: hight next year is that we just start to decelerate 191 00:10:31,040 --> 00:10:33,760 Speaker 1: because people return. Now that's making an assumption that there's 192 00:10:33,800 --> 00:10:38,600 Speaker 1: no further COVID spike or another variant. But yeah, so 193 00:10:38,960 --> 00:10:42,760 Speaker 1: you're right, the wage component cannot be underestimated here well, 194 00:10:43,040 --> 00:10:45,520 Speaker 1: and the wage growth that we've seen of late hasn't 195 00:10:45,600 --> 00:10:48,040 Speaker 1: kept up with the inflation that we've seen of late. 196 00:10:48,120 --> 00:10:50,440 Speaker 1: Of course, there is a time when wage growth was 197 00:10:50,520 --> 00:10:54,080 Speaker 1: far ahead of inflation, and it needs to be even 198 00:10:54,120 --> 00:10:56,400 Speaker 1: out of bit. What do you think the overall picture 199 00:10:56,480 --> 00:10:58,040 Speaker 1: is when we get to the end of this thing 200 00:10:58,080 --> 00:11:00,680 Speaker 1: pre two, people make enough more to keep up with 201 00:11:00,679 --> 00:11:04,840 Speaker 1: the games and prices. I think in the near term, um, 202 00:11:05,400 --> 00:11:09,160 Speaker 1: the real wage growth is negative and and low, but 203 00:11:09,240 --> 00:11:12,080 Speaker 1: they've got a buffer through savings. The savings rate has 204 00:11:12,120 --> 00:11:15,240 Speaker 1: gone up significantly as well. Now there's a question of 205 00:11:15,320 --> 00:11:17,480 Speaker 1: do people really run down their savings. We think there 206 00:11:17,480 --> 00:11:20,120 Speaker 1: will be some component of that next year, and so 207 00:11:20,320 --> 00:11:23,679 Speaker 1: consumption might hold up okay, even though we just will 208 00:11:23,720 --> 00:11:26,080 Speaker 1: not be able to keep up with prices. But once 209 00:11:26,280 --> 00:11:29,120 Speaker 1: the savings rate comes back down to a more normal level, 210 00:11:29,559 --> 00:11:32,200 Speaker 1: then I think we'll have to settle down into you know, 211 00:11:32,280 --> 00:11:35,120 Speaker 1: real wages having to go up. Otherwise consumption is going 212 00:11:35,160 --> 00:11:37,720 Speaker 1: to get hit, which might be a twenty three stories 213 00:11:38,120 --> 00:11:39,720 Speaker 1: PREA thank you so much for joining us. We always 214 00:11:39,720 --> 00:11:43,400 Speaker 1: appreciate getting your thoughts here. Pre A Misra, Managing Director 215 00:11:43,440 --> 00:11:47,160 Speaker 1: and global head of Rates Strategy for TV Securities. Taking 216 00:11:47,200 --> 00:11:50,800 Speaker 1: more the transitory call as it relates to inflation, and 217 00:11:50,800 --> 00:11:52,640 Speaker 1: that is becoming I think a little bit out of 218 00:11:52,760 --> 00:11:58,520 Speaker 1: consensus the farther we get into this. Alright, man, I 219 00:11:58,520 --> 00:12:01,320 Speaker 1: went away for vacation and the ten years trading right 220 00:12:01,360 --> 00:12:03,840 Speaker 1: around one point six percent, and come back a week 221 00:12:03,960 --> 00:12:06,920 Speaker 1: later and it's still trading around one point six percent. 222 00:12:07,000 --> 00:12:10,400 Speaker 1: But I've got a FED that's tapering its bond purchases. 223 00:12:10,640 --> 00:12:13,160 Speaker 1: I've got a FED that's talking about raising rates maybe 224 00:12:13,440 --> 00:12:16,600 Speaker 1: next year, Yet not much movement here in the bond market. 225 00:12:16,640 --> 00:12:18,920 Speaker 1: Let's check in with somebody who does this for a living. 226 00:12:19,000 --> 00:12:22,640 Speaker 1: R J. Gallows, senior portfolio manager for Federator Hermes. R J. 227 00:12:22,800 --> 00:12:25,040 Speaker 1: Give us a sense of kind of how you think 228 00:12:25,280 --> 00:12:28,680 Speaker 1: the FED is kind of going about its business these 229 00:12:28,760 --> 00:12:32,319 Speaker 1: days in terms of tapering, in terms of disclosing, maybe 230 00:12:32,320 --> 00:12:35,800 Speaker 1: how it views the in strate structure maybe mid next year, 231 00:12:35,800 --> 00:12:42,080 Speaker 1: how do you view their performance? I think they probably 232 00:12:42,080 --> 00:12:44,040 Speaker 1: wanted to try to find a way to rewrite the 233 00:12:44,160 --> 00:12:48,679 Speaker 1: dictionary definitions of transitory. Right, there's almost no other way 234 00:12:48,720 --> 00:12:52,000 Speaker 1: to put it. Um. You know, to the point of 235 00:12:52,000 --> 00:12:55,720 Speaker 1: the tenure being at one sixty probably should be higher. Um. 236 00:12:55,840 --> 00:12:58,160 Speaker 1: We when it comes to duration, we like to look 237 00:12:58,200 --> 00:13:00,480 Speaker 1: at the average yield on market way to average yield 238 00:13:00,520 --> 00:13:04,480 Speaker 1: on the Bloomberg US Treasury Index. Now that started the 239 00:13:04,600 --> 00:13:08,560 Speaker 1: year at started this calendar year at fifty seven basis points. 240 00:13:08,600 --> 00:13:12,040 Speaker 1: It's now a hundred and nineteen hundred nineteen is the 241 00:13:13,000 --> 00:13:17,640 Speaker 1: highest it's been since pre covid um. And that's because 242 00:13:17,800 --> 00:13:21,080 Speaker 1: the most FED sensitive parts of the YOK curb are 243 00:13:21,160 --> 00:13:23,280 Speaker 1: very heavily weighted. If you look at the overall treasury 244 00:13:23,280 --> 00:13:27,160 Speaker 1: market to three five, your securities a lot of focus 245 00:13:27,200 --> 00:13:29,760 Speaker 1: on the tenure, but they may have actually obscure what's 246 00:13:29,800 --> 00:13:32,160 Speaker 1: going on here the Fed has had to inflect because 247 00:13:32,160 --> 00:13:35,559 Speaker 1: transitory proved to be an inapt inappropriate description of the 248 00:13:35,600 --> 00:13:39,480 Speaker 1: inflation problem. Uh, They're gonna have to tighten more. Uh, 249 00:13:39,600 --> 00:13:42,319 Speaker 1: So the short ends moved up quite a bit intermediate 250 00:13:42,400 --> 00:13:46,320 Speaker 1: to hang on, do you think they're gonna have to tighten? 251 00:13:46,920 --> 00:13:48,959 Speaker 1: Do you think they're gonna have to raise rates? Or 252 00:13:49,360 --> 00:13:52,120 Speaker 1: are you saying they're gonna have to um speed up 253 00:13:52,200 --> 00:13:59,520 Speaker 1: their UM taper? I think that the probably both To 254 00:13:59,600 --> 00:14:02,760 Speaker 1: me eightening tapering may not be tightening, no, but it's 255 00:14:02,760 --> 00:14:05,840 Speaker 1: pulling your foot off the gas. Uh. It's a precondition 256 00:14:05,960 --> 00:14:08,360 Speaker 1: to getting to the more traditional method of tightening, which 257 00:14:08,400 --> 00:14:12,240 Speaker 1: would be raising interest rates. And the market has come 258 00:14:12,240 --> 00:14:16,640 Speaker 1: to the realization fairly quickly recently that the inflation problem 259 00:14:16,720 --> 00:14:20,520 Speaker 1: isn't transitory. It's it's it's at least problematic if it 260 00:14:20,560 --> 00:14:24,120 Speaker 1: may be temporary, but it's not short lived. Um. And 261 00:14:24,200 --> 00:14:27,240 Speaker 1: as a result, the Fed will be doing both. The 262 00:14:27,240 --> 00:14:29,120 Speaker 1: taper may in fact need to speed up. I don't 263 00:14:29,120 --> 00:14:31,000 Speaker 1: think it would be too difficult for them to do 264 00:14:31,160 --> 00:14:34,160 Speaker 1: to do that, Uh. And then the liftoff will will 265 00:14:34,200 --> 00:14:38,280 Speaker 1: certainly come in two and maybe in multiple steps. Is 266 00:14:38,280 --> 00:14:40,960 Speaker 1: there we had pre a miserable on from TV Securities 267 00:14:40,960 --> 00:14:42,920 Speaker 1: on earlier r J, and she was kind of suggesting 268 00:14:42,960 --> 00:14:46,200 Speaker 1: that a rate increases is not event that it can 269 00:14:46,200 --> 00:14:49,040 Speaker 1: be can effect be pushed out there, but you're suggesting 270 00:14:49,440 --> 00:14:53,040 Speaker 1: something sooner. I don't think that's very likely. I think 271 00:14:53,080 --> 00:14:55,640 Speaker 1: that the Feds, uh, you know, we we have we 272 00:14:55,680 --> 00:14:58,760 Speaker 1: now have real interest rates at record lows and economy 273 00:14:58,800 --> 00:15:02,240 Speaker 1: that's apt to continue to expand. Um. Yes, there are 274 00:15:02,320 --> 00:15:05,640 Speaker 1: problems that are apt to be temporary in terms of 275 00:15:05,720 --> 00:15:08,680 Speaker 1: supply chain that are helping to fuel the inflation story. 276 00:15:08,720 --> 00:15:12,080 Speaker 1: But the problem for the central bank uh becomes more 277 00:15:12,160 --> 00:15:18,400 Speaker 1: complicated if they allow those those temporary inflation bottlenecks to 278 00:15:18,640 --> 00:15:23,200 Speaker 1: be reinforced in wage, salary and price expectations. And that's 279 00:15:23,240 --> 00:15:27,240 Speaker 1: where we're getting. You're seeing break even north of three. Uh. 280 00:15:27,480 --> 00:15:32,440 Speaker 1: The there are wage and salary increases all over the newspapers. Uh. 281 00:15:32,480 --> 00:15:35,520 Speaker 1: You can you feel it. The inflation story is starting 282 00:15:35,520 --> 00:15:38,320 Speaker 1: to heat up. I don't think this is seventy six, 283 00:15:38,440 --> 00:15:41,280 Speaker 1: you know, we're going on our way to nineteen seventy nine. UM. 284 00:15:41,400 --> 00:15:44,200 Speaker 1: I do think the Fed, though, has to inflect back, 285 00:15:44,640 --> 00:15:47,320 Speaker 1: you know, in a traditional method, which is they have 286 00:15:47,440 --> 00:15:50,200 Speaker 1: to raise interest rates they're probably gonna have to get 287 00:15:50,240 --> 00:15:53,160 Speaker 1: the FED funds rate, you know, materially above one and 288 00:15:53,160 --> 00:15:56,880 Speaker 1: a half, maybe two, maybe even more, they say, to fifty. 289 00:15:56,960 --> 00:15:59,200 Speaker 1: The market seems to doubt that the flattening of the 290 00:15:59,280 --> 00:16:02,440 Speaker 1: curve is the confusion in the market. Does the Fed 291 00:16:02,480 --> 00:16:05,560 Speaker 1: really have to go that much higher in order to 292 00:16:05,800 --> 00:16:08,840 Speaker 1: restrain the inflation problem? If they do, then they run 293 00:16:09,040 --> 00:16:11,680 Speaker 1: setting off a recession and you get that sort of 294 00:16:11,760 --> 00:16:14,800 Speaker 1: twist flattening of the curve. Hence the tenure isn't rising 295 00:16:14,840 --> 00:16:17,280 Speaker 1: as much in basis points as we've seen on other 296 00:16:17,280 --> 00:16:19,600 Speaker 1: parts of the curve. Yeah, but we do see real 297 00:16:19,720 --> 00:16:23,640 Speaker 1: yields down at one negative one twenty right, um, And 298 00:16:23,720 --> 00:16:27,440 Speaker 1: that's basically the lowest they've been, right exactly. And and 299 00:16:27,760 --> 00:16:30,360 Speaker 1: I don't think real yields would behave would be behaving 300 00:16:30,400 --> 00:16:34,280 Speaker 1: that way if people felt that greater Fed restraint to 301 00:16:34,360 --> 00:16:37,040 Speaker 1: come in the in the in the future. Here tapering tightening, 302 00:16:37,480 --> 00:16:41,640 Speaker 1: um uh comes without risk. It does come with risk. 303 00:16:42,000 --> 00:16:44,400 Speaker 1: People aren't sure how high the FED can go without 304 00:16:45,200 --> 00:16:48,200 Speaker 1: suppressing growth, and that's why really yields are not coming 305 00:16:48,200 --> 00:16:50,680 Speaker 1: off the floor. Um. I think if people had more 306 00:16:50,720 --> 00:16:54,400 Speaker 1: confidence about longer term growth trajectories than really yields would 307 00:16:54,400 --> 00:16:57,600 Speaker 1: be going up with nominally yields, and that's really not happening. R. J. 308 00:16:58,240 --> 00:17:00,640 Speaker 1: Morgan Stanley is out with a piece today saying steer 309 00:17:00,760 --> 00:17:04,760 Speaker 1: clear of US stocks and bonds. Is that something you 310 00:17:04,960 --> 00:17:09,400 Speaker 1: ascribed to? Um? Well, the chief investment officer of fixed 311 00:17:09,440 --> 00:17:11,040 Speaker 1: income of my company, and I have talked about this 312 00:17:11,040 --> 00:17:14,919 Speaker 1: for a long time. When inflation finally comes, it's going 313 00:17:14,960 --> 00:17:17,880 Speaker 1: to be tough for all financial assets. It's been striking 314 00:17:17,880 --> 00:17:21,040 Speaker 1: how the stock market has bucked the inflation concerns. I 315 00:17:21,119 --> 00:17:24,400 Speaker 1: think because transitory, temporary, whatever would you want to pick um? 316 00:17:24,800 --> 00:17:26,679 Speaker 1: You know, people have bought into that to some degree. 317 00:17:26,720 --> 00:17:30,240 Speaker 1: As that becomes more questionable, you wonder when does the 318 00:17:30,240 --> 00:17:32,760 Speaker 1: stock markets start to struggle to Right now, there's a 319 00:17:32,800 --> 00:17:34,880 Speaker 1: great front page story in the Wall Street Journal about 320 00:17:34,880 --> 00:17:37,159 Speaker 1: companies are benefiting from the inflation sturge. They're doing this 321 00:17:37,320 --> 00:17:40,440 Speaker 1: like once in a generation price increases. That's all great, 322 00:17:40,480 --> 00:17:43,240 Speaker 1: but you can't keep doing that. So a lot depends 323 00:17:43,240 --> 00:17:46,520 Speaker 1: in both markets, stocks and bonds on the timing of 324 00:17:46,600 --> 00:17:50,360 Speaker 1: inflations return to some more tolerable level. And since that's 325 00:17:50,560 --> 00:17:52,680 Speaker 1: yet unknown, I would think risk premiums need to be 326 00:17:52,760 --> 00:17:55,320 Speaker 1: installed in bond yields and they should keep going up 327 00:17:55,880 --> 00:17:58,840 Speaker 1: the stock market. You know, it seems to be bullethrough 328 00:17:58,920 --> 00:18:01,720 Speaker 1: right now. Of surprising, all right, r J, thank you 329 00:18:01,800 --> 00:18:04,040 Speaker 1: so much for joining us. We always appreciate getting your 330 00:18:04,040 --> 00:18:07,800 Speaker 1: thoughts and perspective. R J. Gallos, Senior portfolio manager manager 331 00:18:07,840 --> 00:18:10,320 Speaker 1: for a federator whom he's giving us his thoughts on 332 00:18:10,359 --> 00:18:12,960 Speaker 1: these markets. He thinks we're going to get, in fact, 333 00:18:13,320 --> 00:18:20,640 Speaker 1: a rate increase from the subtle reserve in two when 334 00:18:20,640 --> 00:18:23,680 Speaker 1: Matt Miller can't fill up his Ford F one fifty 335 00:18:23,720 --> 00:18:27,879 Speaker 1: truck with a hundred and fifty dollar prepaid card, that inflation, 336 00:18:28,440 --> 00:18:30,439 Speaker 1: uh questions is that transitory is not going to be 337 00:18:30,480 --> 00:18:31,920 Speaker 1: around for a while. Does he have to think about 338 00:18:31,920 --> 00:18:34,960 Speaker 1: going electric? Let's bring in Steve Wyatt, chief investment strategist 339 00:18:35,000 --> 00:18:38,480 Speaker 1: for b Okay Financial. Steve, let's start with the inflation question. 340 00:18:38,520 --> 00:18:41,520 Speaker 1: It is topic to you're here, uh, in the market 341 00:18:41,560 --> 00:18:44,639 Speaker 1: places here today? How do you think about inflation and 342 00:18:44,680 --> 00:18:46,760 Speaker 1: how does that impact how do you put money to 343 00:18:46,800 --> 00:18:49,800 Speaker 1: work these days? Yeah, thank you, good morning. I appreciate 344 00:18:49,800 --> 00:18:52,240 Speaker 1: the opportunity to be back on your show today. It's 345 00:18:52,320 --> 00:18:54,959 Speaker 1: the it's the sixty four dollar question for all of us, 346 00:18:55,000 --> 00:18:58,440 Speaker 1: and even as we think about the markets and we're investing, 347 00:18:58,520 --> 00:19:01,080 Speaker 1: if we're we're going to shift our thoughts on inflation, 348 00:19:01,160 --> 00:19:05,040 Speaker 1: which we would say that in the beginning we felt 349 00:19:05,080 --> 00:19:08,560 Speaker 1: like the cyclical inflationary pressures would be subsiding a little 350 00:19:08,560 --> 00:19:12,120 Speaker 1: bit more quickly than they are now. Uh. But as 351 00:19:12,119 --> 00:19:15,240 Speaker 1: we think about if that becomes longer term and the 352 00:19:15,240 --> 00:19:18,600 Speaker 1: implications in the capital markets around the bond market, what 353 00:19:18,760 --> 00:19:22,280 Speaker 1: that means from a pricing and a yield standpoint there 354 00:19:23,080 --> 00:19:26,199 Speaker 1: really make it when you think about managing risk a 355 00:19:26,200 --> 00:19:29,760 Speaker 1: little bit difficult, the downside risk and longer term bonds. 356 00:19:29,840 --> 00:19:32,440 Speaker 1: If Rache, you're going to move up to any material 357 00:19:32,440 --> 00:19:37,320 Speaker 1: amount or almost equity alike at the present time, I will, 358 00:19:37,359 --> 00:19:40,000 Speaker 1: first of all, I'll tell you, Paul that I want 359 00:19:40,320 --> 00:19:43,159 Speaker 1: an electric truck. But if I put an order in 360 00:19:43,240 --> 00:19:45,560 Speaker 1: now for the F one fifty Lightning, or if I 361 00:19:45,560 --> 00:19:48,199 Speaker 1: put it in order now for the Rivan or the 362 00:19:48,240 --> 00:19:51,119 Speaker 1: cyber truck from Tesla, no matter what, I'll be waiting 363 00:19:51,280 --> 00:19:54,160 Speaker 1: years before I get one of those. Your player, I'm 364 00:19:54,160 --> 00:19:56,280 Speaker 1: treating which get to the front of the line. So now, 365 00:19:56,440 --> 00:19:59,840 Speaker 1: which which kind of which kind of um? I think 366 00:20:00,040 --> 00:20:02,800 Speaker 1: reinforces the point that inflation is going to be here 367 00:20:02,840 --> 00:20:05,320 Speaker 1: for a while because I'm not going to get my 368 00:20:05,400 --> 00:20:09,359 Speaker 1: lightning that I ordered today until three, so I have 369 00:20:09,560 --> 00:20:14,520 Speaker 1: to buy you know, uh six point two leaders supercharged 370 00:20:14,920 --> 00:20:18,720 Speaker 1: ram t r X. Now UM when you when you 371 00:20:18,840 --> 00:20:23,879 Speaker 1: said Steve that it's um. It looks different compared with 372 00:20:23,720 --> 00:20:26,000 Speaker 1: the with the fixed income versus the equity market. I 373 00:20:26,000 --> 00:20:29,600 Speaker 1: wonder we were talking earlier with PhD from Harvard who 374 00:20:29,600 --> 00:20:31,560 Speaker 1: said the equity market is the only game in town 375 00:20:31,640 --> 00:20:34,640 Speaker 1: right now. Do you see it the same way? Well, 376 00:20:34,640 --> 00:20:37,760 Speaker 1: I would say this look a longer term if sharply, 377 00:20:37,840 --> 00:20:41,640 Speaker 1: higher interest rates or inflation are not necessarily good for equities. 378 00:20:42,080 --> 00:20:44,080 Speaker 1: But if you're looking for the asset class that at 379 00:20:44,119 --> 00:20:47,960 Speaker 1: least has the ability to respond to inflationary pressure and 380 00:20:48,000 --> 00:20:51,840 Speaker 1: protect investors capital at least in the short run, that's 381 00:20:51,880 --> 00:20:55,040 Speaker 1: that's the equity markets. If you're looking at cash or 382 00:20:55,040 --> 00:20:58,639 Speaker 1: fixed income, we just think the downside risk there is 383 00:20:59,640 --> 00:21:02,320 Speaker 1: even higher. Now within the equity markets, maybe there's some 384 00:21:02,400 --> 00:21:04,680 Speaker 1: parts of the market that certainly do better than others, 385 00:21:04,800 --> 00:21:10,240 Speaker 1: the cyclicals, energy materials. The problem is is that after 386 00:21:10,520 --> 00:21:14,240 Speaker 1: twenty years a plus of disinflation, they become such a 387 00:21:14,320 --> 00:21:17,919 Speaker 1: smaller part of the SMP five hundred that it's a 388 00:21:18,119 --> 00:21:21,240 Speaker 1: very narrow beat, to be honest with you, because those 389 00:21:21,359 --> 00:21:24,240 Speaker 1: those sectors that benefit from lower inflation have become so 390 00:21:24,320 --> 00:21:27,240 Speaker 1: much larger, but they can act as an inflation hedge. 391 00:21:27,600 --> 00:21:32,240 Speaker 1: Um is your point. I bought two thousand, fourteen f 392 00:21:32,359 --> 00:21:37,040 Speaker 1: one fifty raptor then for fifty eight thousand dollars fully loaded. 393 00:21:37,480 --> 00:21:40,920 Speaker 1: I'm ordering a new one now for eight five thousand 394 00:21:40,960 --> 00:21:45,040 Speaker 1: dollars fully loaded, and it's only been it's a seven years. 395 00:21:45,640 --> 00:21:49,719 Speaker 1: I'm just telling you the same product basically, um, although 396 00:21:49,760 --> 00:21:51,919 Speaker 1: frankly not as good because the old one had a 397 00:21:51,920 --> 00:21:54,240 Speaker 1: six point two leader narse aspected V eight and the 398 00:21:54,280 --> 00:21:56,440 Speaker 1: new one has a three and a half. The same 399 00:21:56,520 --> 00:21:59,840 Speaker 1: product costs more a lot more seven years later. So 400 00:22:00,080 --> 00:22:03,200 Speaker 1: we do see that inflation, Paul, We do, And so Steve, 401 00:22:03,280 --> 00:22:06,359 Speaker 1: if I'm if I'm an investor here, I mean, should 402 00:22:06,400 --> 00:22:08,919 Speaker 1: I be surprised that the ten years still at one 403 00:22:08,960 --> 00:22:11,119 Speaker 1: point six percent? I thought I would have seen it 404 00:22:11,680 --> 00:22:14,600 Speaker 1: much higher, given the taper, given the fact that we're 405 00:22:14,640 --> 00:22:18,480 Speaker 1: talking about rate increases next year. Yeah, So here's kind 406 00:22:18,480 --> 00:22:20,400 Speaker 1: of how we view this, And I've got to tell 407 00:22:20,400 --> 00:22:23,480 Speaker 1: you guys, the fact that the tenure note is remaining 408 00:22:23,760 --> 00:22:27,040 Speaker 1: as low as it is from Marlins is really kind 409 00:22:27,080 --> 00:22:31,440 Speaker 1: of a really negative message from the standpoint that we 410 00:22:31,600 --> 00:22:34,200 Speaker 1: entered this year thinking longer term rates could float higher 411 00:22:34,200 --> 00:22:37,680 Speaker 1: as we saw better economic activity and be we're able 412 00:22:37,720 --> 00:22:41,080 Speaker 1: to move to a scenario where the economy can operate 413 00:22:41,160 --> 00:22:45,159 Speaker 1: without this extraordinary amount of monetary accommodation. Be a quantitative 414 00:22:45,200 --> 00:22:46,840 Speaker 1: eas in which I'm glad to see the Fed get 415 00:22:46,880 --> 00:22:49,520 Speaker 1: out of that. The concept of throwing liquidity at a 416 00:22:49,560 --> 00:22:53,840 Speaker 1: supply constrained economy makes less and less sense over time. 417 00:22:54,359 --> 00:22:56,119 Speaker 1: But even as we think about the Fed trying to 418 00:22:56,240 --> 00:23:01,000 Speaker 1: raise interest rates off of zero percent, uh, we would 419 00:23:01,000 --> 00:23:03,200 Speaker 1: have hoped that the market could move to that, to 420 00:23:03,359 --> 00:23:07,640 Speaker 1: that type of an outlook. But as we've seen inflationary 421 00:23:07,680 --> 00:23:10,600 Speaker 1: pressures increase as we've as the Fed talks about tapering, 422 00:23:10,680 --> 00:23:13,240 Speaker 1: now the long end of the market, the flattening of 423 00:23:13,320 --> 00:23:15,480 Speaker 1: the yield curve, it's almost like the long end is 424 00:23:15,560 --> 00:23:19,520 Speaker 1: saying the worst inflation is now the lower it's going 425 00:23:19,560 --> 00:23:22,159 Speaker 1: to be longer term, because it's going to destroy so 426 00:23:22,320 --> 00:23:25,600 Speaker 1: much demand and make growth harder to come by as 427 00:23:25,680 --> 00:23:27,600 Speaker 1: we move a longer term. To me, it's just a 428 00:23:27,720 --> 00:23:30,800 Speaker 1: really negative message out of the bond market and something 429 00:23:30,840 --> 00:23:34,920 Speaker 1: we are kind of worried about. Why, uh do we 430 00:23:35,040 --> 00:23:38,920 Speaker 1: see consumer confidence hit so hard? Last week we saw 431 00:23:39,000 --> 00:23:41,960 Speaker 1: the U mission numbers at a low ten. You're low, 432 00:23:42,040 --> 00:23:46,320 Speaker 1: I think, so good time to buy a car, all 433 00:23:46,440 --> 00:23:48,840 Speaker 1: time lows, good time to buy a house, all time low. 434 00:23:48,880 --> 00:23:51,520 Speaker 1: It's all price driven. And look, I think you can 435 00:23:51,560 --> 00:23:53,280 Speaker 1: come back to kind of the old saw in the 436 00:23:53,359 --> 00:23:56,280 Speaker 1: commodities markets over time is the cure for high prices 437 00:23:56,320 --> 00:23:59,399 Speaker 1: as high prices. But the downside of that is is 438 00:23:59,480 --> 00:24:03,520 Speaker 1: it's becas of that demand destruction that uh that it's 439 00:24:03,560 --> 00:24:06,520 Speaker 1: not necessarily good from an economic growth standpoint. Look, we're 440 00:24:06,560 --> 00:24:11,000 Speaker 1: still optimistic on economic growth going into next year. We 441 00:24:11,119 --> 00:24:14,000 Speaker 1: think the labor market holds a huge key to how 442 00:24:14,119 --> 00:24:17,960 Speaker 1: this unfolds. The ability to get labor back into the 443 00:24:18,040 --> 00:24:23,119 Speaker 1: labor market one two, increase the productive capacity of the 444 00:24:23,200 --> 00:24:26,760 Speaker 1: economy to meet some of this demand that's there, uh, 445 00:24:26,880 --> 00:24:30,160 Speaker 1: to help untangle some of the supply change and get 446 00:24:30,440 --> 00:24:33,040 Speaker 1: some of the goods that are trapped in transit to 447 00:24:33,280 --> 00:24:38,000 Speaker 1: be distributed. But in a in an almost counterintuitive way 448 00:24:38,440 --> 00:24:41,200 Speaker 1: that's going to help cap if you will, the amount 449 00:24:41,240 --> 00:24:44,359 Speaker 1: of inflationary pressure that we're seeing from kind of what 450 00:24:44,520 --> 00:24:46,480 Speaker 1: you were talking about in your comments, and that is 451 00:24:46,600 --> 00:24:51,159 Speaker 1: demand that cannot be met. So prices just keep going higher, UH, 452 00:24:51,240 --> 00:24:53,600 Speaker 1: and look like they're gonna go higher. It looks like 453 00:24:53,640 --> 00:24:55,640 Speaker 1: it's gonna get a little worse before it gets better. 454 00:24:56,080 --> 00:24:59,119 Speaker 1: But if the labor market will untangle a little bit, 455 00:24:59,240 --> 00:25:02,440 Speaker 1: we start seeing UH people coming back into the labor 456 00:25:02,480 --> 00:25:04,880 Speaker 1: force right now, there is no fear of missing out. 457 00:25:05,480 --> 00:25:07,680 Speaker 1: You look at the number of quits and the jolts data. 458 00:25:08,040 --> 00:25:11,480 Speaker 1: It's almost unbelievable, isn't it so? But when you've got 459 00:25:11,600 --> 00:25:14,639 Speaker 1: help wanted signs everywhere you look, if you feel like 460 00:25:14,800 --> 00:25:16,800 Speaker 1: the job, Durana, I don't like this. I don't like 461 00:25:16,920 --> 00:25:19,880 Speaker 1: this job. Today you quit knowing that you can get 462 00:25:19,880 --> 00:25:23,320 Speaker 1: another job somewhere else. But we hope the labor market 463 00:25:24,080 --> 00:25:26,240 Speaker 1: unfolds from here in a way that it helps us 464 00:25:26,480 --> 00:25:32,240 Speaker 1: UH improve capacity for output and also help cap inflationary 465 00:25:32,280 --> 00:25:34,960 Speaker 1: pressure a little bit. All right, Steve, thanks so much 466 00:25:35,000 --> 00:25:37,720 Speaker 1: for joining us. We appreciate getting your thoughts here on 467 00:25:37,800 --> 00:25:40,639 Speaker 1: this economy rates UH in this market. Steve Why a 468 00:25:40,760 --> 00:25:44,119 Speaker 1: chief investment strategist for b o K Financial, and I 469 00:25:44,160 --> 00:25:47,359 Speaker 1: guess again, uh as Steve was mentioning, the job market 470 00:25:47,480 --> 00:25:50,040 Speaker 1: is certainly fascinating. We look at the jobs claims every Thursday. 471 00:25:50,080 --> 00:25:52,480 Speaker 1: We look at the jobs number on a monthly basis, 472 00:25:52,720 --> 00:25:55,159 Speaker 1: very very closely here, and the question is will we 473 00:25:55,320 --> 00:25:57,920 Speaker 1: get some of those five or six million people back 474 00:25:58,040 --> 00:26:02,800 Speaker 1: into the workforce. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcast. 475 00:26:03,200 --> 00:26:06,360 Speaker 1: You can subscribe and listen to interviews of Apple Podcasts 476 00:26:06,560 --> 00:26:10,440 Speaker 1: or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm 477 00:26:10,480 --> 00:26:13,879 Speaker 1: on Twitter at Matt Miller nineteen seventy three. Pet On 478 00:26:14,000 --> 00:26:16,400 Speaker 1: False Swoeney, I'm on Twitter at p T. Sweeney. Before 479 00:26:16,480 --> 00:26:19,280 Speaker 1: the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg 480 00:26:19,359 --> 00:26:19,600 Speaker 1: Radio