WEBVTT - The NFL Draft with Nate Tice

0:00:02.160 --> 0:00:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the solid verbal hell that.

0:00:05.320 --> 0:00:08.160
<v Speaker 2>For me, I'm a man, I'm forty.

0:00:08.240 --> 0:00:10.119
<v Speaker 3>I've heard so many players say, well, I want to

0:00:10.119 --> 0:00:12.080
<v Speaker 3>be happy. You want to be happy for a day?

0:00:12.520 --> 0:00:14.800
<v Speaker 2>Da steak? Is that woo woom?

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:20.439
<v Speaker 1>And Dan and Tye, welcome back to the solid verbal

0:00:20.520 --> 0:00:23.000
<v Speaker 1>boys and girls. My name is ty hilden Brandt. That

0:00:23.079 --> 0:00:25.920
<v Speaker 1>fine gentleman over there, the so called monster of the Midway,

0:00:26.000 --> 0:00:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Dan Rubinstein in the heart of the Midwest, Chicago, Illinois, Sir,

0:00:30.080 --> 0:00:30.520
<v Speaker 1>how are you?

0:00:31.240 --> 0:00:34.280
<v Speaker 3>I'm terrific, Ty, I'm terrific. There's no rain, there's no snow,

0:00:34.320 --> 0:00:36.640
<v Speaker 3>there's nothing happening. I had a nice weekend, had a

0:00:36.640 --> 0:00:38.320
<v Speaker 3>good pizza bake, yes, Shay go, and to make some

0:00:38.360 --> 0:00:41.479
<v Speaker 3>more today, which is always always fun for me. So

0:00:42.080 --> 0:00:45.240
<v Speaker 3>this is so. We're doing an NFL Draft show today. Yes,

0:00:45.520 --> 0:00:48.280
<v Speaker 3>and as always we're driven by Geico. Yes, Convermi, you

0:00:48.320 --> 0:00:50.560
<v Speaker 3>are driven by our friends of Geico. Yes, yes, Okay,

0:00:51.040 --> 0:00:53.360
<v Speaker 3>just wanted to make sure because I'm I'm feeling like

0:00:53.400 --> 0:00:56.160
<v Speaker 3>the wind in my hair as we drive down the

0:00:56.200 --> 0:00:59.040
<v Speaker 3>content road here. That's right. I love the NFL Draft.

0:00:59.200 --> 0:01:04.080
<v Speaker 3>I basically watch no NFL games before the before the playoffs,

0:01:04.120 --> 0:01:06.000
<v Speaker 3>just because life is so busy, and work is so

0:01:06.040 --> 0:01:09.479
<v Speaker 3>busy doing soliverbal and college football things during the fall

0:01:09.560 --> 0:01:12.639
<v Speaker 3>time on the weekends. But I love the NFL Draft.

0:01:12.680 --> 0:01:16.440
<v Speaker 3>I love the strategy of it. I love taking players

0:01:16.480 --> 0:01:18.720
<v Speaker 3>that we watched a ton of in college and seeing

0:01:18.720 --> 0:01:22.280
<v Speaker 3>how another group of people evaluate what their futures and

0:01:22.319 --> 0:01:24.880
<v Speaker 3>how good they are or were or seemed but warrant

0:01:24.959 --> 0:01:28.320
<v Speaker 3>or didn't seem but are those kinds of things and love.

0:01:29.360 --> 0:01:33.080
<v Speaker 3>I love the mechanics of the NFL Draft, And that's

0:01:33.080 --> 0:01:35.360
<v Speaker 3>why I'm especially excited because this is a first time

0:01:35.360 --> 0:01:37.160
<v Speaker 3>guest that we're having on today, Nate Tice from the

0:01:37.160 --> 0:01:40.240
<v Speaker 3>Athletic I love all of the brains that go into it,

0:01:40.360 --> 0:01:43.560
<v Speaker 3>and it's such an inexact science. There's so much guesswork

0:01:43.640 --> 0:01:47.240
<v Speaker 3>to it, but I think that's what makes it incredibly

0:01:47.280 --> 0:01:51.280
<v Speaker 3>fun and interesting. Oh, I'm quite excited for today's show.

0:01:51.480 --> 0:01:56.400
<v Speaker 1>It is also the hardest sporting event to convince your

0:01:56.440 --> 0:02:00.840
<v Speaker 1>spouse and or significant other to like watch, Yeah, because

0:02:00.920 --> 0:02:04.480
<v Speaker 1>when you describe to them what it is, HM, you're

0:02:04.480 --> 0:02:10.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna wait fifteen minutes, ten minutes in between picks and

0:02:10.040 --> 0:02:13.600
<v Speaker 1>they're going to call someone to a podium and in

0:02:13.680 --> 0:02:17.920
<v Speaker 1>between it's all filler, Dan m hm. And it goes

0:02:17.960 --> 0:02:22.360
<v Speaker 1>on for hours, three days, yes, four days, however long

0:02:22.400 --> 0:02:25.440
<v Speaker 1>it is. Yeah, three yeah. This is where we're at

0:02:25.480 --> 0:02:27.000
<v Speaker 1>with the NFL Draft. But I love it too.

0:02:27.040 --> 0:02:27.640
<v Speaker 3>It's awesome.

0:02:28.080 --> 0:02:30.760
<v Speaker 1>It is great. It is one of those points of

0:02:31.280 --> 0:02:34.240
<v Speaker 1>overlap between college and pro. If you're a college fan,

0:02:34.280 --> 0:02:36.200
<v Speaker 1>you want to see how your favorite college stars do,

0:02:36.680 --> 0:02:39.440
<v Speaker 1>where they get drafted, how they translate to the next level.

0:02:39.720 --> 0:02:41.840
<v Speaker 1>If you're an NFL fan, in a lot of cases,

0:02:42.360 --> 0:02:44.960
<v Speaker 1>it may be your introduction into the previous year of

0:02:44.960 --> 0:02:47.560
<v Speaker 1>college football. Right you don't you watch it, but you

0:02:47.600 --> 0:02:49.360
<v Speaker 1>care about who your team's gonna get. You start reading

0:02:49.400 --> 0:02:51.520
<v Speaker 1>up on these guys looking back to see how they

0:02:51.520 --> 0:02:53.880
<v Speaker 1>did in college. So one of those cool moments for

0:02:53.960 --> 0:02:56.280
<v Speaker 1>us where we get to talk to NFL people. Talk

0:02:56.360 --> 0:02:59.560
<v Speaker 1>to Robert Mays of The Athletic Football Show. Last year,

0:03:00.040 --> 0:03:02.320
<v Speaker 1>we're talking to his co host, Nate Tice. Don't forget

0:03:02.440 --> 0:03:05.120
<v Speaker 1>Verballers dot Com is where you can go if you

0:03:05.120 --> 0:03:07.360
<v Speaker 1>want to get access to this show, all our shows.

0:03:07.400 --> 0:03:10.240
<v Speaker 1>A little bit early. We've got bonus content out there

0:03:10.280 --> 0:03:13.160
<v Speaker 1>as well. A discord server that continues to pop off

0:03:13.600 --> 0:03:17.160
<v Speaker 1>in these deep, dark, cold days of the college football offseason.

0:03:17.639 --> 0:03:19.600
<v Speaker 1>You can also go on out there and listen to

0:03:19.639 --> 0:03:21.920
<v Speaker 1>our limited run of Extra Nuggets, the show that my

0:03:22.080 --> 0:03:25.400
<v Speaker 1>beloved co host d Andrew is with longtime friend of

0:03:25.440 --> 0:03:28.280
<v Speaker 1>the show and voice of the Chicago Bulls Adam.

0:03:28.080 --> 0:03:33.440
<v Speaker 3>Ameme, center around Jeopardy correct responses with additional context verballers

0:03:33.480 --> 0:03:35.680
<v Speaker 3>dot com one verballers dot com. He has v E

0:03:35.800 --> 0:03:37.680
<v Speaker 3>R B A L L E r s dot com.

0:03:38.200 --> 0:03:40.400
<v Speaker 3>And also, I know we've been reminding.

0:03:40.000 --> 0:03:42.840
<v Speaker 1>Folks, but Solid Giveaway dot Com is where you can

0:03:42.880 --> 0:03:44.960
<v Speaker 1>go and through your name in the hat if you

0:03:45.000 --> 0:03:48.120
<v Speaker 1>want to win an AJ Brown signed ole miss any

0:03:48.160 --> 0:03:51.680
<v Speaker 1>helmet you've got Until April the twenty third, it's about

0:03:51.680 --> 0:03:54.120
<v Speaker 1>two more weeks before we draw the winner and then

0:03:54.120 --> 0:03:56.720
<v Speaker 1>we'll do it all over again with somebody different. But

0:03:56.960 --> 0:04:02.520
<v Speaker 1>AJ Brown is up for the drawing. Now you're name

0:04:02.560 --> 0:04:02.880
<v Speaker 1>in the hat.

0:04:03.600 --> 0:04:07.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. In the college football universe, before we get into

0:04:07.960 --> 0:04:10.280
<v Speaker 3>to Nate and all sorts of draft things, there have

0:04:10.320 --> 0:04:12.360
<v Speaker 3>been spring games. I don't know if you watched any

0:04:13.160 --> 0:04:16.200
<v Speaker 3>highlights news anything. I saw Clemson there were a lot

0:04:16.240 --> 0:04:18.719
<v Speaker 3>of struggles, but maybe it's because they have such strong

0:04:18.760 --> 0:04:22.000
<v Speaker 3>defensive linemen. I don't know. I watched some clips of.

0:04:21.960 --> 0:04:25.560
<v Speaker 1>Michigan Club nick Man, my boy, your guy, my boy.

0:04:26.760 --> 0:04:31.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. I didn't see a terrible amount of news regarding

0:04:31.480 --> 0:04:35.240
<v Speaker 3>spring game stuff outside of that, but we do absolutely

0:04:35.279 --> 0:04:41.000
<v Speaker 3>need to mention Dwayne Haskins. Dwayne Haskins, the tragedy twenty four,

0:04:41.279 --> 0:04:49.960
<v Speaker 3>twenty four years old, and just those who spent significant

0:04:50.000 --> 0:04:54.000
<v Speaker 3>around time around Dwayne Haskins. Obviously, we watched him from

0:04:54.000 --> 0:04:57.760
<v Speaker 3>Afar and were thrilled to see how prolific a player

0:04:57.760 --> 0:05:00.000
<v Speaker 3>and successful a player he was at Ohio State and

0:05:00.160 --> 0:05:03.039
<v Speaker 3>his brief time as a starting quarterback there. But you

0:05:03.120 --> 0:05:05.560
<v Speaker 3>read the stories and the experiences of the people who

0:05:05.640 --> 0:05:07.240
<v Speaker 3>spend a lot of time around him, and it's just

0:05:07.400 --> 0:05:11.800
<v Speaker 3>absolutely heartbreaking to lose somebody like that who had so

0:05:11.880 --> 0:05:15.600
<v Speaker 3>much meaning, well so much meaning for so many people.

0:05:15.680 --> 0:05:19.080
<v Speaker 3>And so it's just just a brutal bit of news

0:05:19.120 --> 0:05:20.000
<v Speaker 3>from over the weekend.

0:05:20.160 --> 0:05:23.479
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely devastating to hear that news. I sent it to

0:05:23.520 --> 0:05:24.200
<v Speaker 1>you and I saw it.

0:05:24.320 --> 0:05:28.360
<v Speaker 3>We were both bored. So yeah, and especially painful reminder,

0:05:28.400 --> 0:05:30.600
<v Speaker 3>as you know, we're talking about draft stuff, and we're

0:05:30.600 --> 0:05:33.120
<v Speaker 3>talking about, you know, the strengths and weaknesses of a

0:05:33.120 --> 0:05:36.520
<v Speaker 3>player or of a program, or like talking about humans.

0:05:36.800 --> 0:05:40.000
<v Speaker 3>We're talking about human beings who are doing their absolute

0:05:40.000 --> 0:05:45.359
<v Speaker 3>best to further their place professionally. But man just gutted

0:05:45.600 --> 0:05:46.480
<v Speaker 3>to see what happened.

0:05:46.560 --> 0:05:50.640
<v Speaker 1>Well, on that tragic note, Dan, we will segue here

0:05:50.720 --> 0:05:54.520
<v Speaker 1>to the topic dujor on the show. Yes, it is

0:05:54.560 --> 0:05:59.240
<v Speaker 1>the NFL Draft. It is Nat Tice. I don't know, like,

0:05:59.320 --> 0:06:03.440
<v Speaker 1>do you have any preference when it comes to the

0:06:03.560 --> 0:06:06.320
<v Speaker 1>NFL Draft with respect to the guys that you like,

0:06:06.480 --> 0:06:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Because I've talked about this before on our show. I

0:06:09.600 --> 0:06:13.159
<v Speaker 1>am a sucker for pretty much every wide receiver. Yeah,

0:06:13.160 --> 0:06:16.760
<v Speaker 1>every wide receiver, every standout wide receiver that's ever come

0:06:16.800 --> 0:06:19.880
<v Speaker 1>out of college. I have been utterly convinced that they're

0:06:19.920 --> 0:06:22.360
<v Speaker 1>going to pop at the next level, to the extent

0:06:22.400 --> 0:06:25.640
<v Speaker 1>where I'm playing in fantasy football leagues, dynasty leagues where

0:06:25.680 --> 0:06:29.640
<v Speaker 1>you're required to draft some of these young draft prospects,

0:06:30.200 --> 0:06:33.679
<v Speaker 1>and I pick them all and most of them never pop.

0:06:33.720 --> 0:06:35.880
<v Speaker 1>I got Tyler Lockett, right, it took them a little

0:06:35.880 --> 0:06:38.120
<v Speaker 1>bit to get there. I've gotten a couple other guy.

0:06:38.160 --> 0:06:40.680
<v Speaker 1>I got Odell Beckham, right, I've gotten a couple guys

0:06:40.760 --> 0:06:42.040
<v Speaker 1>right along the way.

0:06:42.240 --> 0:06:43.640
<v Speaker 3>What a brave stand you took.

0:06:44.000 --> 0:06:48.120
<v Speaker 1>But player exactly like, you're not going to confuse me

0:06:48.240 --> 0:06:50.680
<v Speaker 1>with Nate Tice, who actually knows what he's looking at.

0:06:50.960 --> 0:06:53.160
<v Speaker 1>Do you have any guys like that or any position

0:06:53.240 --> 0:06:56.760
<v Speaker 1>groups like that where you're just hook line and sinker

0:06:56.800 --> 0:06:59.080
<v Speaker 1>for whoever the names are in that given year.

0:06:59.720 --> 0:07:04.840
<v Speaker 3>I'm always rooting for not just the players, but the destinations.

0:07:04.960 --> 0:07:08.880
<v Speaker 3>For the Swiss Army knife speed types d Anthony Thomas,

0:07:09.000 --> 0:07:12.960
<v Speaker 3>Tyreek Hill, Percy Harvin, most recently Deebo Samuel who landed

0:07:13.000 --> 0:07:17.679
<v Speaker 3>in the absolute perfect system and situation Taevon Austin. Guys

0:07:17.680 --> 0:07:20.160
<v Speaker 3>who are just so fast and so talented and so

0:07:20.240 --> 0:07:22.440
<v Speaker 3>good with the ball. They're not a pure receiver, they're

0:07:22.480 --> 0:07:25.120
<v Speaker 3>not a pure running back, they're not a flanker per se.

0:07:25.160 --> 0:07:27.720
<v Speaker 3>They're not an outside guy per se. Where they're the

0:07:28.320 --> 0:07:33.880
<v Speaker 3>sort of at best that interchangeable talent that is lightning

0:07:33.880 --> 0:07:36.320
<v Speaker 3>in a bottle, but at worst they end up somewhere

0:07:36.320 --> 0:07:38.720
<v Speaker 3>that tries to put the circle in the square peg.

0:07:39.040 --> 0:07:43.040
<v Speaker 3>So I'm always rooting for those guys who are inside

0:07:43.040 --> 0:07:47.000
<v Speaker 3>outside players who have that ability to land somewhere that

0:07:47.760 --> 0:07:50.920
<v Speaker 3>sees the beauty in their specific talents. That's what I

0:07:51.000 --> 0:07:53.760
<v Speaker 3>root for. Shall we dive right in I'm ready.

0:07:53.800 --> 0:07:56.120
<v Speaker 1>Let's do it already Dan joining us now from the

0:07:56.200 --> 0:07:59.400
<v Speaker 1>Athletic The Athletic Football Show with our friend Robert Mays,

0:07:59.400 --> 0:08:02.160
<v Speaker 1>who actually did this interview with us a year ago.

0:08:03.320 --> 0:08:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Please to welcome Nate Tice to the Solid Verbals. Sir,

0:08:06.160 --> 0:08:06.560
<v Speaker 1>how are you?

0:08:07.120 --> 0:08:10.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm doing well? Yeah? Now you got both of us.

0:08:09.840 --> 0:08:12.560
<v Speaker 2>That's good. Complete completely the set. Now you need Lindsey

0:08:12.640 --> 0:08:14.840
<v Speaker 2>Jones and Chokapatia if you work.

0:08:14.840 --> 0:08:17.480
<v Speaker 1>Our way, yeah, work away through the mount rushmore.

0:08:17.720 --> 0:08:20.480
<v Speaker 2>So. Yeah, you did the reverse Mortal Kombat. You started

0:08:20.520 --> 0:08:23.880
<v Speaker 2>with Shao Khan. Whoa. Now you're on the goro. I

0:08:23.880 --> 0:08:24.559
<v Speaker 2>guess I'm goro.

0:08:26.840 --> 0:08:30.640
<v Speaker 3>That's true, a natural goro. Yeah, Tice, we'll use that.

0:08:31.640 --> 0:08:34.120
<v Speaker 2>I appreciate that. No, thanks for having me all guys,

0:08:34.120 --> 0:08:36.200
<v Speaker 2>this is perfect. I know our appre show. I feel

0:08:36.240 --> 0:08:38.160
<v Speaker 2>like I've used up all my good bits. So I

0:08:38.200 --> 0:08:38.880
<v Speaker 2>have a couple more.

0:08:39.080 --> 0:08:42.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, if we can harvest those yeahs as we go

0:08:42.559 --> 0:08:45.680
<v Speaker 1>through here. So look, how how are you right? You've

0:08:45.720 --> 0:08:49.800
<v Speaker 1>been intimately involved with all things football for a good

0:08:49.840 --> 0:08:52.480
<v Speaker 1>long time now, you know, sort of in this role

0:08:52.520 --> 0:08:55.160
<v Speaker 1>now with the Athletic you're making the rest of us smarter,

0:08:55.240 --> 0:08:57.000
<v Speaker 1>and that's why we wanted to bring you on because

0:08:57.040 --> 0:09:01.080
<v Speaker 1>the NFL Draft happens a few weeks from now. The

0:09:01.160 --> 0:09:04.040
<v Speaker 1>draft is one of those points of intersect between college

0:09:04.040 --> 0:09:07.480
<v Speaker 1>football fans, hardcore college football fans, and the NFL, and

0:09:07.520 --> 0:09:10.920
<v Speaker 1>there's always that gray area, right, like the translation from

0:09:11.000 --> 0:09:16.240
<v Speaker 1>college to pro. How have you been spending your time

0:09:16.360 --> 0:09:18.960
<v Speaker 1>now as you're trying to suss out the NFL draft,

0:09:18.960 --> 0:09:20.680
<v Speaker 1>Like what can you give us a sense for what

0:09:20.720 --> 0:09:23.000
<v Speaker 1>that looks like for you as you're evaluating talent?

0:09:23.600 --> 0:09:25.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, right now, it's kind of the calm period, which

0:09:25.920 --> 0:09:27.880
<v Speaker 2>is kind of funny. The closer it gets, the callmber

0:09:27.920 --> 0:09:31.400
<v Speaker 2>it gets. But I would say when I'm starting out

0:09:31.600 --> 0:09:34.120
<v Speaker 2>and this is this is my first year doing this

0:09:34.200 --> 0:09:36.720
<v Speaker 2>on the media side, where during the season I'm covering

0:09:36.840 --> 0:09:40.040
<v Speaker 2>the NFL stuff with Robert doing the shows right and

0:09:40.080 --> 0:09:42.559
<v Speaker 2>stuff up, you know what I see, and then also

0:09:42.840 --> 0:09:46.280
<v Speaker 2>having to keep tabs on college guys. So this is

0:09:46.320 --> 0:09:48.559
<v Speaker 2>my first experience to doing this stuff from the media world,

0:09:48.800 --> 0:09:51.079
<v Speaker 2>and really you're just starting out, Okay, who are the

0:09:51.120 --> 0:09:54.199
<v Speaker 2>draft eligible guys and going like, okay, all right, who

0:09:54.240 --> 0:09:56.520
<v Speaker 2>are your seniors? And now that's actually becoming even dicier.

0:09:56.600 --> 0:09:58.120
<v Speaker 2>That's what actually went through this year with all the

0:09:58.120 --> 0:10:01.160
<v Speaker 2>COVID stuff and everybody getting those extra years. How how

0:10:01.240 --> 0:10:06.079
<v Speaker 2>teams listed their guys on websites was all inconsistent. Already

0:10:06.120 --> 0:10:08.600
<v Speaker 2>Notre Dame and Stanford do something screwy because they don't

0:10:08.600 --> 0:10:10.440
<v Speaker 2>say red shirt and stuff. So that always is like,

0:10:10.480 --> 0:10:12.800
<v Speaker 2>oh God, and now we got the COVID year. And

0:10:12.840 --> 0:10:16.040
<v Speaker 2>so you got like this guy Tyler Algiere from from BYU.

0:10:16.280 --> 0:10:17.840
<v Speaker 2>There was one side that had him as a sophomore,

0:10:17.920 --> 0:10:19.520
<v Speaker 2>one side had him as junior, one side had him

0:10:19.559 --> 0:10:21.880
<v Speaker 2>as a redcher at senior, and like it was just like, okay,

0:10:21.920 --> 0:10:24.439
<v Speaker 2>what are you? But that's just part of the fun.

0:10:24.880 --> 0:10:26.839
<v Speaker 2>But figuring all these out, you're really hoping for these

0:10:26.840 --> 0:10:29.120
<v Speaker 2>guys to pop. You know of some guys like before

0:10:29.120 --> 0:10:31.480
<v Speaker 2>going into this year, I knew who John Matchi was.

0:10:31.640 --> 0:10:33.800
<v Speaker 2>I know who he is. I've watched DeVante Smith, I

0:10:33.800 --> 0:10:36.319
<v Speaker 2>watched Jerry Judy. But like a guy like James and

0:10:36.360 --> 0:10:39.240
<v Speaker 2>Williams just stepping up out of nowhere. That's what's fun.

0:10:39.440 --> 0:10:42.120
<v Speaker 2>Like with the scouting processes, these guys pops, it's the

0:10:42.200 --> 0:10:45.400
<v Speaker 2>Joe Burrows come out of nowhere. Then. But then there's

0:10:45.440 --> 0:10:47.360
<v Speaker 2>guys that you've heard about for years and years and years,

0:10:47.360 --> 0:10:50.040
<v Speaker 2>the Thibadeau's of the world that you know about since

0:10:50.280 --> 0:10:52.640
<v Speaker 2>senior year of high school. And so that's what's fun

0:10:52.679 --> 0:10:56.040
<v Speaker 2>about scouting is that just getting to like see these

0:10:56.080 --> 0:10:59.400
<v Speaker 2>guys reveal themselves and once I really like to wait

0:10:59.480 --> 0:11:02.240
<v Speaker 2>until about the December or so, like to really get

0:11:02.240 --> 0:11:03.640
<v Speaker 2>a feel for these guys when you have a full

0:11:03.640 --> 0:11:06.480
<v Speaker 2>season of tape and you're trying to watch these guys

0:11:07.000 --> 0:11:09.280
<v Speaker 2>against the best competition. I also like to watch these

0:11:09.280 --> 0:11:12.320
<v Speaker 2>guys against maybe lesser competition to see them actually dominate,

0:11:12.720 --> 0:11:15.600
<v Speaker 2>like see like, hey, in perfect circumstances, what did you do?

0:11:15.880 --> 0:11:18.000
<v Speaker 2>Like how did you do it? As well as the

0:11:18.000 --> 0:11:20.160
<v Speaker 2>big games you know against when they go against the

0:11:20.160 --> 0:11:22.480
<v Speaker 2>Alabamas into Georgia's and the Ohio States of the world.

0:11:22.760 --> 0:11:25.440
<v Speaker 2>But really long winded answer to say, scouting is just

0:11:25.480 --> 0:11:28.360
<v Speaker 2>letting it wash over you and just hoping that someone

0:11:28.400 --> 0:11:30.920
<v Speaker 2>pops and then you're just like okay, or that guy's notable,

0:11:31.080 --> 0:11:32.640
<v Speaker 2>and then checking the lists to see, you know, other

0:11:32.640 --> 0:11:33.760
<v Speaker 2>people are seeing the same thing.

0:11:34.600 --> 0:11:36.760
<v Speaker 1>Nate, you mentioned guys that come out of nowhere. I

0:11:36.760 --> 0:11:38.600
<v Speaker 1>want to bring up Kenny Pickett for a second if

0:11:38.640 --> 0:11:43.000
<v Speaker 1>I could, I know in some of the analysis you've done.

0:11:43.120 --> 0:11:45.920
<v Speaker 1>You have some commentary about his progressions, how he needs

0:11:45.960 --> 0:11:49.480
<v Speaker 1>to develop on that front. Obviously, the talking point going

0:11:49.480 --> 0:11:51.600
<v Speaker 1>into the draft and after the combine has been the

0:11:51.640 --> 0:11:54.480
<v Speaker 1>eight and a half inch hands, which another data point.

0:11:54.960 --> 0:11:58.079
<v Speaker 1>But you hit on something with the guys who come

0:11:58.120 --> 0:12:00.360
<v Speaker 1>out of nowhere that I've always thought, and I'm not

0:12:00.440 --> 0:12:04.839
<v Speaker 1>an analyst, I'm not a scout, but my untrained eye

0:12:04.920 --> 0:12:07.000
<v Speaker 1>is always a little bit concerned when a guy like

0:12:07.080 --> 0:12:11.480
<v Speaker 1>a Kenny Pickett has just a meteoric rise in the

0:12:11.480 --> 0:12:15.200
<v Speaker 1>course of one season. Kenny Pickett threw more touchdowns this

0:12:15.240 --> 0:12:17.680
<v Speaker 1>past season than he had in the previous three combined.

0:12:18.000 --> 0:12:20.440
<v Speaker 1>It was an incredible year by any stretch. But I

0:12:20.559 --> 0:12:24.240
<v Speaker 1>always worry that guys like that are fools gold. Now counterpoint,

0:12:24.360 --> 0:12:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Joe Burrow not fools gold, and he fits a similar template.

0:12:27.920 --> 0:12:31.800
<v Speaker 1>But give us your sense of Kenny Pickett. How worried

0:12:31.840 --> 0:12:35.520
<v Speaker 1>should folks be? How high should he go on draft Day?

0:12:35.559 --> 0:12:38.160
<v Speaker 1>What is his status as a pro quarterback moving forward?

0:12:38.760 --> 0:12:42.839
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, with Picket is and people are compared these two

0:12:42.880 --> 0:12:45.040
<v Speaker 2>is Burrow and Pickett just because of that meteoric rise.

0:12:46.040 --> 0:12:49.000
<v Speaker 2>A lot of this is going into process and going

0:12:49.040 --> 0:12:52.000
<v Speaker 2>what they do as a snap's going pre and post snap,

0:12:52.080 --> 0:12:54.320
<v Speaker 2>so just discerning what the defense is, if they have

0:12:54.360 --> 0:12:56.760
<v Speaker 2>any protection stuff, and then after snap, seeing where their

0:12:56.760 --> 0:12:59.320
<v Speaker 2>eyes go. And why I'm bringing that up is even

0:12:59.320 --> 0:13:03.120
<v Speaker 2>before Burrow's huge year, I I I'm not gonna say

0:13:03.120 --> 0:13:05.160
<v Speaker 2>like I have heard a Burrow before that big year,

0:13:05.240 --> 0:13:07.360
<v Speaker 2>but when you would watch him and then watch the

0:13:07.440 --> 0:13:10.640
<v Speaker 2>previous season before he blew up, you could still see

0:13:10.640 --> 0:13:12.720
<v Speaker 2>some of the processing stuff. You could still see some

0:13:12.720 --> 0:13:15.200
<v Speaker 2>of the flashes of going, okay, you get it, like

0:13:15.280 --> 0:13:18.720
<v Speaker 2>you get how to play the quarterback position. The offense

0:13:18.800 --> 0:13:21.680
<v Speaker 2>wasn't great. You weren't great either, but you at least, like,

0:13:22.040 --> 0:13:23.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, you looked like a Day three pick. Like

0:13:24.040 --> 0:13:25.920
<v Speaker 2>at the time he really looked like a fifth, sixth,

0:13:26.040 --> 0:13:30.200
<v Speaker 2>seventh rounder type. And then he just exploded that now

0:13:30.240 --> 0:13:31.679
<v Speaker 2>we're all gonna know who Joe Burrow is for the

0:13:31.720 --> 0:13:35.600
<v Speaker 2>rest of our lives. With Pickett is yes, all he

0:13:35.679 --> 0:13:38.040
<v Speaker 2>is an older prospect and all that, And why I

0:13:38.040 --> 0:13:39.920
<v Speaker 2>bring that up is that is what's more than more

0:13:39.960 --> 0:13:41.680
<v Speaker 2>than the hand size, more than any of that stuff

0:13:41.800 --> 0:13:43.920
<v Speaker 2>is for a guy that's an older guy in an

0:13:43.960 --> 0:13:46.600
<v Speaker 2>offense that he's been in before, he doesn't really stand

0:13:46.679 --> 0:13:49.080
<v Speaker 2>the pocket and process how I thought he would. I

0:13:49.120 --> 0:13:50.840
<v Speaker 2>thought he would be a one to two to three

0:13:50.880 --> 0:13:54.120
<v Speaker 2>to four machine, just a vet, you know, just sitting

0:13:54.120 --> 0:13:56.520
<v Speaker 2>in there knifing and you know, dicing guys up from

0:13:56.520 --> 0:13:58.560
<v Speaker 2>the pocket. And really he's a one and done guy,

0:13:58.720 --> 0:14:01.440
<v Speaker 2>which is also his strength. And when I mean one

0:14:01.480 --> 0:14:03.840
<v Speaker 2>and done, it's I'm going to read a that's not

0:14:03.960 --> 0:14:07.160
<v Speaker 2>open scramble time. Let's make go make a play happen.

0:14:07.559 --> 0:14:10.120
<v Speaker 2>And that's his best asset is he can create, which

0:14:10.160 --> 0:14:12.200
<v Speaker 2>is needed at the quarterback position in the NFL. Now,

0:14:12.240 --> 0:14:14.800
<v Speaker 2>you can't just be a bled cell. You can't be

0:14:15.000 --> 0:14:17.280
<v Speaker 2>just you can be Tom Brady, but you also need

0:14:17.320 --> 0:14:19.400
<v Speaker 2>about ten years of experience to get to that level

0:14:19.480 --> 0:14:21.600
<v Speaker 2>of sitting in the pocket and not creating with your legs.

0:14:21.640 --> 0:14:23.520
<v Speaker 2>You need to be able to create, especially early in

0:14:23.520 --> 0:14:25.800
<v Speaker 2>your career so you can get the mental reps. So

0:14:25.840 --> 0:14:28.680
<v Speaker 2>the fact that he's a guy that's been an offense

0:14:28.680 --> 0:14:31.080
<v Speaker 2>for years, for a couple of years, he's an older prospect,

0:14:31.080 --> 0:14:33.560
<v Speaker 2>he's going against less younger guys, and the fact that

0:14:33.600 --> 0:14:35.840
<v Speaker 2>he's still mentally is more like a one and done

0:14:35.880 --> 0:14:39.720
<v Speaker 2>freshman sophomore type. That's that's my cost for concern with him.

0:14:39.840 --> 0:14:41.800
<v Speaker 2>I have him as a late second early third round

0:14:41.800 --> 0:14:45.720
<v Speaker 2>grade I and this is not like it's kind of

0:14:45.720 --> 0:14:47.200
<v Speaker 2>a joke, but I don't mean it to be about

0:14:47.200 --> 0:14:50.280
<v Speaker 2>compared with Tyra Hanikey from Washington and the fact that

0:14:50.360 --> 0:14:52.520
<v Speaker 2>I think he's a better version of that and how

0:14:52.720 --> 0:14:54.520
<v Speaker 2>Picket wins. How all these guys you have to figure

0:14:54.520 --> 0:14:56.760
<v Speaker 2>out how they win, and how Picket wins is creation

0:14:57.000 --> 0:15:00.640
<v Speaker 2>and accuracy, and if his mental process is from the pocket,

0:15:00.680 --> 0:15:02.120
<v Speaker 2>he can get to a system. It's a little more

0:15:02.120 --> 0:15:03.760
<v Speaker 2>patient with him. I think he needs more time than

0:15:03.760 --> 0:15:05.960
<v Speaker 2>people realize. I think people are like, oh, plug and play,

0:15:06.200 --> 0:15:08.520
<v Speaker 2>he's pro ready. I think he still needs some time

0:15:08.520 --> 0:15:10.920
<v Speaker 2>as far as mentally to like calm himself down in

0:15:10.960 --> 0:15:12.800
<v Speaker 2>the pocket and really like process from there.

0:15:13.440 --> 0:15:17.560
<v Speaker 1>You've also made a similar comment about Matt Corral from

0:15:17.560 --> 0:15:22.880
<v Speaker 1>Olbyss and Sam Howell from North Carolina. Now different context.

0:15:23.280 --> 0:15:25.480
<v Speaker 1>I think you focus in a little bit more on

0:15:25.520 --> 0:15:28.680
<v Speaker 1>the systems that Corral and how have run, But the

0:15:28.920 --> 0:15:31.680
<v Speaker 1>criticism is sort of in the same vein with regard

0:15:31.720 --> 0:15:35.840
<v Speaker 1>to processing. When you get to this stage in your career, Nate,

0:15:36.040 --> 0:15:38.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you obviously are pretty familiar with the NFL

0:15:38.560 --> 0:15:41.360
<v Speaker 1>and how things work on that level. Can you coach

0:15:41.400 --> 0:15:43.960
<v Speaker 1>a guy up to the point where that processing gets

0:15:44.000 --> 0:15:46.120
<v Speaker 1>to where it needs to be, where the read progression

0:15:46.120 --> 0:15:48.600
<v Speaker 1>can get to where it needs to be, or is

0:15:48.680 --> 0:15:51.520
<v Speaker 1>the concern that it's too little, too late at this point?

0:15:52.200 --> 0:15:56.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you can, and that's why it's a guy. I'm

0:15:56.400 --> 0:15:58.560
<v Speaker 2>going to tire all both sides of my mouth. You can.

0:15:58.800 --> 0:16:01.600
<v Speaker 2>But the thing is, it takes time. And also you

0:16:01.640 --> 0:16:04.080
<v Speaker 2>want to see the flashes of it when they're in college,

0:16:04.400 --> 0:16:06.320
<v Speaker 2>because then it's a it's a can or won't thing?

0:16:06.760 --> 0:16:09.000
<v Speaker 2>A right are they doing that? Because you can't do

0:16:09.080 --> 0:16:11.240
<v Speaker 2>it or you won't do it? We can teach it

0:16:11.280 --> 0:16:13.320
<v Speaker 2>into you, you know, like it's that's what you're trying

0:16:13.360 --> 0:16:16.080
<v Speaker 2>to figure out. Like that's why so at corral Is

0:16:16.280 --> 0:16:19.280
<v Speaker 2>lane Kiff and I have seen run various versions of offense,

0:16:19.440 --> 0:16:23.120
<v Speaker 2>r PO heavy pro style mix in pistol, like just

0:16:23.120 --> 0:16:24.680
<v Speaker 2>a little bit of everything. He changes it up all

0:16:24.720 --> 0:16:29.920
<v Speaker 2>the time, seeing him in situations where the quarterback is

0:16:30.000 --> 0:16:32.080
<v Speaker 2>usually has to be the most valuable guy at third

0:16:32.080 --> 0:16:34.120
<v Speaker 2>and six, At third and seven, Hey, what's drop back

0:16:34.160 --> 0:16:35.880
<v Speaker 2>and pass? And you have to find the right throw

0:16:36.680 --> 0:16:38.800
<v Speaker 2>they Lane Kiffin would choose to just run like a

0:16:38.880 --> 0:16:41.600
<v Speaker 2>QB counter, which just choose to run a screen. And

0:16:41.640 --> 0:16:44.400
<v Speaker 2>that's where my red awords go off. And so that's

0:16:44.400 --> 0:16:46.280
<v Speaker 2>why each guy a guy can come from an RPO

0:16:46.320 --> 0:16:49.440
<v Speaker 2>heavy system. Matt Jones perfect example. Like everyone wants to

0:16:49.480 --> 0:16:52.280
<v Speaker 2>think Alabama as his pro style, it's not his RPO's

0:16:52.360 --> 0:16:56.600
<v Speaker 2>RPOs get his processing in. It was so it was magical.

0:16:56.720 --> 0:16:58.760
<v Speaker 2>It was just how quick he went what you like,

0:16:58.840 --> 0:17:00.480
<v Speaker 2>he would just in the ball, just go to the

0:17:00.480 --> 0:17:02.480
<v Speaker 2>perfect spot every time. So that was one of those

0:17:02.520 --> 0:17:04.240
<v Speaker 2>where it's like, Okay, you didn't run a lot of

0:17:04.240 --> 0:17:07.640
<v Speaker 2>pro style stuff quote unquote pro style, but I think

0:17:07.760 --> 0:17:09.520
<v Speaker 2>you can. I'm in make a bet that you can

0:17:09.560 --> 0:17:12.080
<v Speaker 2>handle it. When you watch a Matt corral is, anytime

0:17:12.119 --> 0:17:14.280
<v Speaker 2>he has to go one to two, they do run

0:17:14.280 --> 0:17:16.760
<v Speaker 2>a drop back. It's like hold onto your hat. Sometimes

0:17:16.800 --> 0:17:18.440
<v Speaker 2>he can do it. Sometimes it's all over the place.

0:17:18.560 --> 0:17:20.600
<v Speaker 2>A lot of times he's looking to run. You never

0:17:20.640 --> 0:17:22.280
<v Speaker 2>really want to see these guys. And both of these

0:17:22.320 --> 0:17:23.960
<v Speaker 2>guys do a crow and howe is they look to

0:17:24.040 --> 0:17:26.760
<v Speaker 2>run and pick it. They all look to run right away.

0:17:26.960 --> 0:17:29.439
<v Speaker 2>And why that matters is you have to do damage

0:17:29.440 --> 0:17:32.040
<v Speaker 2>from the pocket. You have to because defense is just

0:17:32.040 --> 0:17:34.360
<v Speaker 2>too fast and good. You can't just keep scrambling. You're

0:17:34.359 --> 0:17:37.000
<v Speaker 2>gonna get whacked over it and you just can't. It's

0:17:37.000 --> 0:17:39.120
<v Speaker 2>a three yard game where you just took a shot

0:17:39.240 --> 0:17:41.880
<v Speaker 2>and that's not worth it to the offense. Yes, using

0:17:41.880 --> 0:17:43.760
<v Speaker 2>your legs on like a third down getting it is good,

0:17:43.760 --> 0:17:46.880
<v Speaker 2>but not living that way, making a living that way.

0:17:47.240 --> 0:17:48.959
<v Speaker 2>And so that's where my concerns with Carral and how

0:17:49.000 --> 0:17:50.639
<v Speaker 2>Will come is that when they were asked to do

0:17:50.680 --> 0:17:53.000
<v Speaker 2>the drop X stuff, it was it was a grab bag.

0:17:53.200 --> 0:17:55.880
<v Speaker 2>There's no consistency to their game. And it's like, yes,

0:17:56.000 --> 0:17:57.920
<v Speaker 2>you can get on these guys on the whiteboard and

0:17:58.600 --> 0:18:00.840
<v Speaker 2>at the combine and go, okay, maybe they can handle it.

0:18:01.200 --> 0:18:03.320
<v Speaker 2>But when you're seeing just maybe those three or four

0:18:03.400 --> 0:18:05.240
<v Speaker 2>or five snaps a game and they can't really do

0:18:05.280 --> 0:18:07.639
<v Speaker 2>it consistently, that's where you're concerned. Is that, Well, if

0:18:07.680 --> 0:18:09.720
<v Speaker 2>they can't do it for five snaps, now I'm asking

0:18:09.760 --> 0:18:12.640
<v Speaker 2>them doing it for fifteen twenty five snaps. That's that's

0:18:12.680 --> 0:18:13.359
<v Speaker 2>a little scary.

0:18:14.040 --> 0:18:17.480
<v Speaker 3>Every year, quarterback classes are basically always looked at as

0:18:17.560 --> 0:18:20.639
<v Speaker 3>wild cards. You know, everybody's playing different competition, everybody's running

0:18:20.640 --> 0:18:23.600
<v Speaker 3>different schemes, and everybody's going to enter into different situations.

0:18:24.080 --> 0:18:28.119
<v Speaker 3>So if you are able to use your captain hindsight

0:18:28.160 --> 0:18:31.680
<v Speaker 3>of the past three, four or five years and say, Okay,

0:18:32.119 --> 0:18:35.159
<v Speaker 3>these were all wild cards. These guys kind of worked

0:18:35.200 --> 0:18:37.720
<v Speaker 3>out and it wasn't obvious that they would, and these

0:18:37.760 --> 0:18:41.000
<v Speaker 3>guys didn't and it seemed obvious that they would. What

0:18:41.160 --> 0:18:45.080
<v Speaker 3>are there any lessons you can apply to the past three,

0:18:45.160 --> 0:18:47.879
<v Speaker 3>four or five years of quarterback classes looking at this

0:18:47.960 --> 0:18:50.560
<v Speaker 3>class who are like, Okay, I could see it working

0:18:50.640 --> 0:18:53.560
<v Speaker 3>out even though this guy seems like, Man, I don't

0:18:53.560 --> 0:18:56.479
<v Speaker 3>know if it's all. There are there examples that you

0:18:56.520 --> 0:18:58.919
<v Speaker 3>can you can pull from your your memory banks.

0:18:58.960 --> 0:19:01.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm sure a lot of people will probably say

0:19:01.280 --> 0:19:03.159
<v Speaker 2>Josh Allen because but Josh Allen is gonna be the

0:19:03.160 --> 0:19:06.840
<v Speaker 2>outlier of all outliers in life. I'm not even just

0:19:06.840 --> 0:19:10.000
<v Speaker 2>talking about football scouting. I'm talking about data points in life.

0:19:10.960 --> 0:19:13.280
<v Speaker 2>Stocks like you want to compare to. That's what Josh,

0:19:13.400 --> 0:19:17.199
<v Speaker 2>I mean anything a baseball card that also becomes you know,

0:19:17.359 --> 0:19:20.640
<v Speaker 2>a Honus Wagner. No, I would say more is justin

0:19:20.680 --> 0:19:23.359
<v Speaker 2>Herbert And that's where I've taken a ton of lessons

0:19:23.359 --> 0:19:26.920
<v Speaker 2>from it. Actually really that whole class Burrow to and Herbert,

0:19:27.320 --> 0:19:31.240
<v Speaker 2>because with Herbert it was there's he was the guy

0:19:31.280 --> 0:19:33.000
<v Speaker 2>that more than anything, and I think I did an

0:19:33.000 --> 0:19:34.440
<v Speaker 2>interview once where I was just like, I wish I

0:19:34.480 --> 0:19:36.760
<v Speaker 2>could just talk with him and see how smart he is,

0:19:36.800 --> 0:19:40.200
<v Speaker 2>because there's flashes of him handling it. But the offense

0:19:40.200 --> 0:19:44.120
<v Speaker 2>he ran was the most basic, like passing game you'll

0:19:44.160 --> 0:19:47.360
<v Speaker 2>ever see. Tons of sprintouts, tons of like just two

0:19:47.440 --> 0:19:51.320
<v Speaker 2>man routes to receivers wearing like thirty eight and twenty seven.

0:19:51.440 --> 0:19:53.199
<v Speaker 2>Like you never want to see a receiver wearing a

0:19:53.240 --> 0:19:56.720
<v Speaker 2>thirty number. That is, that is not a good sign

0:19:56.840 --> 0:20:00.000
<v Speaker 2>for your offense. So that is a big lesson I've learned.

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:02.240
<v Speaker 2>It was that he was playing with garbage skill guys,

0:20:02.320 --> 0:20:04.840
<v Speaker 2>and I'm sorry if any of them became anything out.

0:20:04.680 --> 0:20:06.640
<v Speaker 3>Of I'm an Oregon fan and a lot I can

0:20:06.720 --> 0:20:10.159
<v Speaker 3>tell you it was extremely frustrating to watch that offense.

0:20:10.400 --> 0:20:12.879
<v Speaker 2>It was, and even watching it at Herbert I was

0:20:12.920 --> 0:20:14.520
<v Speaker 2>I would say it was high on Herbert, but I

0:20:14.560 --> 0:20:16.359
<v Speaker 2>had like a fair first round great on him, I

0:20:16.680 --> 0:20:19.000
<v Speaker 2>trust me. I was not expecting this, No one was.

0:20:19.720 --> 0:20:21.800
<v Speaker 2>But I loved him in college. But then that was

0:20:21.840 --> 0:20:23.280
<v Speaker 2>the thing when you're watching is that was the can

0:20:23.359 --> 0:20:25.720
<v Speaker 2>or won't? Thing? Is that can you handle the harder stuff?

0:20:25.800 --> 0:20:27.439
<v Speaker 2>Or is he just like this is just you know,

0:20:27.800 --> 0:20:29.600
<v Speaker 2>like this is what they have to do to get

0:20:29.640 --> 0:20:32.440
<v Speaker 2>an offense, a tangible offense, a whole bunch of OC's,

0:20:32.640 --> 0:20:34.560
<v Speaker 2>you know, a whole bunch of changes. He was the

0:20:34.600 --> 0:20:37.160
<v Speaker 2>steady presence and all that. Those are things I would

0:20:37.160 --> 0:20:39.359
<v Speaker 2>have given more tips of the you know, feathers in

0:20:39.400 --> 0:20:41.520
<v Speaker 2>his cap coming as a prospect and say the flip

0:20:41.520 --> 0:20:44.480
<v Speaker 2>side Tua running all those RPOs. It turns out that's

0:20:44.480 --> 0:20:47.959
<v Speaker 2>probably what he needs to run. And there's nothing against RPOs.

0:20:48.000 --> 0:20:49.600
<v Speaker 2>Like every even in the NFL, you still have to

0:20:49.640 --> 0:20:52.000
<v Speaker 2>have a sprinkling of them, but you just can't major

0:20:52.000 --> 0:20:54.560
<v Speaker 2>in them. It's just defenses are just too good what

0:20:54.640 --> 0:20:56.159
<v Speaker 2>they just are. But you can get once in a

0:20:56.160 --> 0:20:57.960
<v Speaker 2>while sprinkle in a make it easy on your offense,

0:20:58.000 --> 0:20:59.480
<v Speaker 2>but it's just really hard to major in them. And

0:20:59.520 --> 0:21:01.320
<v Speaker 2>I think that's what I've learned from two is like

0:21:02.359 --> 0:21:04.720
<v Speaker 2>we've given it a chance. The Dolphins gave it a

0:21:04.800 --> 0:21:06.880
<v Speaker 2>chance to run that heavy RPO system. I don't think

0:21:06.920 --> 0:21:08.359
<v Speaker 2>it's it's tangible in the NFL.

0:21:08.800 --> 0:21:10.680
<v Speaker 3>Is there something you can glean from that because I've

0:21:10.680 --> 0:21:14.360
<v Speaker 3>actually seen data points of like, okay, RPOs removed, this

0:21:14.440 --> 0:21:17.080
<v Speaker 3>is what a quarterback does or can't do. Is there

0:21:17.080 --> 0:21:20.840
<v Speaker 3>something you can take from like the ability to decide quickly,

0:21:20.880 --> 0:21:23.399
<v Speaker 3>the ability to read a defense quickly, because that is

0:21:23.440 --> 0:21:27.040
<v Speaker 3>what an RPO demands a quarterback do. Is there something

0:21:27.080 --> 0:21:29.640
<v Speaker 3>that you can take from that element of I mean

0:21:29.680 --> 0:21:31.600
<v Speaker 3>all of these guys have run it to a certain extent.

0:21:31.640 --> 0:21:32.760
<v Speaker 3>Is something you can take from that?

0:21:33.119 --> 0:21:36.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? And it's processing is did they make the give

0:21:36.280 --> 0:21:39.440
<v Speaker 2>or take read properly? And that's really is they asked

0:21:39.520 --> 0:21:41.520
<v Speaker 2>him to do this, Did he execute it properly or

0:21:41.600 --> 0:21:43.679
<v Speaker 2>did he just pull it to call his own number?

0:21:43.760 --> 0:21:46.159
<v Speaker 2>And they've just made it to a terrible situation. And

0:21:46.200 --> 0:21:50.640
<v Speaker 2>also just trace wise accuracy. That's mac Row's best strength

0:21:50.720 --> 0:21:53.320
<v Speaker 2>really is his how how quick of a trigger? He asked?

0:21:53.400 --> 0:21:56.160
<v Speaker 2>Like how quick he It's like a shortstop. That's actually

0:21:56.200 --> 0:21:58.560
<v Speaker 2>his biggest positive. And that's what you look at too.

0:21:58.600 --> 0:22:00.240
<v Speaker 2>It's just like are you able to squeez in the

0:22:00.240 --> 0:22:02.840
<v Speaker 2>tight spaces? Are you able to change arm angles? That's

0:22:02.880 --> 0:22:05.919
<v Speaker 2>another skill that these guys have to have. Everything's not

0:22:05.920 --> 0:22:08.880
<v Speaker 2>with drill work. You just catch it. Everything's perfect throw,

0:22:09.359 --> 0:22:11.960
<v Speaker 2>you have to change it down below, over the top,

0:22:12.000 --> 0:22:14.720
<v Speaker 2>put touch on it. So those are a little trait

0:22:14.760 --> 0:22:15.800
<v Speaker 2>things that you look at for those.

0:22:16.960 --> 0:22:21.320
<v Speaker 3>Is anything appear to you jump off the videotape as

0:22:21.320 --> 0:22:25.320
<v Speaker 3>it were about practice time limitation right? That these guys

0:22:25.920 --> 0:22:27.640
<v Speaker 3>are limited. I mean they can watch as much tape

0:22:27.640 --> 0:22:29.080
<v Speaker 3>as they want to do. They can do walk through

0:22:29.080 --> 0:22:31.439
<v Speaker 3>as they have summer throwing sessions, things of that nature.

0:22:31.920 --> 0:22:34.359
<v Speaker 3>But you are limited as a college player that you

0:22:34.359 --> 0:22:36.879
<v Speaker 3>can only practice so much. That you can look at

0:22:36.920 --> 0:22:40.359
<v Speaker 3>a quarterback and say, man, it seems that by all accounts,

0:22:40.400 --> 0:22:42.919
<v Speaker 3>he is very coachable. He is very eager to like

0:22:43.000 --> 0:22:45.520
<v Speaker 3>grind it out on the practice field. But you can

0:22:45.560 --> 0:22:48.320
<v Speaker 3>tell that for whatever reason, the system that they're running,

0:22:48.320 --> 0:22:50.280
<v Speaker 3>as you mentioned with Justin Herbert for example, is pretty

0:22:50.280 --> 0:22:52.560
<v Speaker 3>simplistic and is not asking a lot of him. Is

0:22:52.600 --> 0:22:54.840
<v Speaker 3>there a guy in this year's quarterback class that you

0:22:54.880 --> 0:22:58.280
<v Speaker 3>can say, I see the potential jumping off the page

0:22:58.280 --> 0:22:59.480
<v Speaker 3>if he gets to the right.

0:22:59.359 --> 0:23:03.679
<v Speaker 2>Place, Well, Malik Willis, That's yeah, that's the easy answer.

0:23:04.240 --> 0:23:06.399
<v Speaker 2>I would say Desmond Ritter for this, But Desmond, I

0:23:06.480 --> 0:23:08.560
<v Speaker 2>think is more of a he can go into a

0:23:08.640 --> 0:23:11.040
<v Speaker 2>lot of systems and be okay in I think he

0:23:11.080 --> 0:23:13.560
<v Speaker 2>can mentally handle that. I would saying Milik willis though,

0:23:13.640 --> 0:23:16.520
<v Speaker 2>going to a system and just taking time it. Really

0:23:17.040 --> 0:23:19.720
<v Speaker 2>I could see him kind of like fitting in in

0:23:19.800 --> 0:23:22.240
<v Speaker 2>different like what you want to ask him, Boot game,

0:23:22.640 --> 0:23:24.840
<v Speaker 2>sprint out game, a lot of you know, drop back,

0:23:24.960 --> 0:23:27.240
<v Speaker 2>launched the ball. I don't think quick game would be

0:23:27.320 --> 0:23:30.520
<v Speaker 2>his his his forte ever, but I think Malik willis

0:23:30.520 --> 0:23:33.840
<v Speaker 2>getting into a Shanahan type offense where they let him

0:23:33.840 --> 0:23:35.560
<v Speaker 2>move out of the pocket a whole bunch of times,

0:23:35.800 --> 0:23:38.480
<v Speaker 2>but also having someone he can sit behind where he

0:23:38.520 --> 0:23:41.040
<v Speaker 2>doesn't have to be the guy, and so that narrows

0:23:41.080 --> 0:23:43.760
<v Speaker 2>down where he could fit in even more specifically, But

0:23:43.840 --> 0:23:46.160
<v Speaker 2>that would be an idealistic situation for him. From Milik

0:23:46.200 --> 0:23:48.520
<v Speaker 2>willis from liberty because he just needs a little He

0:23:48.560 --> 0:23:51.200
<v Speaker 2>needs time. It's just not even just the offense he's running,

0:23:51.240 --> 0:23:53.760
<v Speaker 2>because it's just burbage. Because going from Hugh Freees offense

0:23:53.760 --> 0:23:58.480
<v Speaker 2>which is very simple, to reading defenses, that's where I

0:23:58.520 --> 0:24:01.080
<v Speaker 2>actually think his biggest growing pains will happen. He can

0:24:01.080 --> 0:24:03.400
<v Speaker 2>figure out everyone, He's smart enough, he can figure out

0:24:03.400 --> 0:24:05.919
<v Speaker 2>the terms and blah blah blah. It's just rope memorization,

0:24:06.400 --> 0:24:08.959
<v Speaker 2>but figuring out how the defenses are and what they

0:24:08.960 --> 0:24:11.560
<v Speaker 2>can do, and what they looks are, where the pressure's

0:24:11.560 --> 0:24:14.200
<v Speaker 2>coming from. That's going to take the most time for him.

0:24:14.240 --> 0:24:16.199
<v Speaker 2>So I think being in a system that makes it

0:24:16.240 --> 0:24:17.640
<v Speaker 2>easier on him would be the best.

0:24:17.880 --> 0:24:20.800
<v Speaker 1>I saw an observation Nate from Max Brown of the

0:24:20.840 --> 0:24:23.720
<v Speaker 1>PAC twelve network who pointed out that when he watched

0:24:23.720 --> 0:24:26.320
<v Speaker 1>tape on the leak Willis, he noticed that he padded

0:24:26.320 --> 0:24:29.639
<v Speaker 1>the ball before all of his throws, And you know,

0:24:29.680 --> 0:24:31.119
<v Speaker 1>he went into a little bit of detail as to

0:24:31.200 --> 0:24:33.040
<v Speaker 1>why that's not a good thing and how at this

0:24:33.080 --> 0:24:35.359
<v Speaker 1>stage in his career, maybe that's something you can coach

0:24:35.359 --> 0:24:37.600
<v Speaker 1>out of him. Maybe it isn't, But you know, there's

0:24:37.680 --> 0:24:41.080
<v Speaker 1>such level of detail that goes into these scouting grades.

0:24:41.800 --> 0:24:44.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, is there any way to quantify how big

0:24:44.320 --> 0:24:46.480
<v Speaker 1>of a project the guy like a Malik Willis is

0:24:46.960 --> 0:24:48.960
<v Speaker 1>versus a guy like I mean, frankly, all of these

0:24:49.040 --> 0:24:51.679
<v Speaker 1>quarterbacks are a project on some level, right, But is

0:24:51.680 --> 0:24:53.879
<v Speaker 1>there any way to quantify that in your mind? Like

0:24:54.320 --> 0:24:57.560
<v Speaker 1>who comes with the greatest risk but potentially the greatest reward?

0:24:58.359 --> 0:25:00.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? I how I have gone about it, and I've

0:25:00.680 --> 0:25:04.320
<v Speaker 2>stolen this from basketball like a so tim I'm a

0:25:04.320 --> 0:25:07.600
<v Speaker 2>misso Timberwolves fan and they're playing the playing game this week.

0:25:07.640 --> 0:25:11.679
<v Speaker 2>So yeah. Also yeah, but there there there's a blog

0:25:11.760 --> 0:25:13.440
<v Speaker 2>that's be a nation blog for them that's actually pretty

0:25:13.480 --> 0:25:16.160
<v Speaker 2>great called canus hoopis. But in there a guy that

0:25:16.440 --> 0:25:18.679
<v Speaker 2>he was just a commentator that ended up now he

0:25:18.720 --> 0:25:21.680
<v Speaker 2>works for the Nuggets. Uh, he would just do star, starter,

0:25:21.960 --> 0:25:24.879
<v Speaker 2>bench or bust, and just how to discern these guys.

0:25:24.920 --> 0:25:27.880
<v Speaker 2>And ever since I've stolen that when I'm breaking prospects,

0:25:28.000 --> 0:25:29.760
<v Speaker 2>is what's his likelihood of being a star, what's his

0:25:29.840 --> 0:25:32.320
<v Speaker 2>like Gohood being starter, bench or bust, you know, role

0:25:32.359 --> 0:25:36.600
<v Speaker 2>player bust. And that's looking at Willis and just trying

0:25:36.600 --> 0:25:38.359
<v Speaker 2>to give you an answer on this is quantifying that

0:25:38.520 --> 0:25:41.119
<v Speaker 2>is that he has the highest star potential of these guys.

0:25:41.200 --> 0:25:43.840
<v Speaker 2>He has the if we put it twelve percent, you know,

0:25:44.240 --> 0:25:48.160
<v Speaker 2>or eight percent something like that, but he has maybe

0:25:48.200 --> 0:25:50.560
<v Speaker 2>the lower starter potential where it's just like, hey, he's

0:25:50.600 --> 0:25:53.240
<v Speaker 2>just the guy. Or and he also has the highest

0:25:53.280 --> 0:25:56.320
<v Speaker 2>bunch of bus potential as well, because it's just like

0:25:56.400 --> 0:25:58.560
<v Speaker 2>he could just totally flame out and all that. So

0:25:58.600 --> 0:26:00.639
<v Speaker 2>when you're right, when you go with these guys. And

0:26:00.640 --> 0:26:02.560
<v Speaker 2>that's what's so crazy for me is I have a

0:26:02.960 --> 0:26:05.720
<v Speaker 2>same kind of a year grade with Picket as Willis,

0:26:06.440 --> 0:26:09.520
<v Speaker 2>but kind of that middle late second, early third is

0:26:09.920 --> 0:26:12.000
<v Speaker 2>you're kind of like you give a half round inflation

0:26:12.040 --> 0:26:13.600
<v Speaker 2>for a quarterback, So if I have a mid second

0:26:13.680 --> 0:26:15.840
<v Speaker 2>round grade, you take them in the late first Like

0:26:15.880 --> 0:26:18.159
<v Speaker 2>that kind of is how it goes, like a little bit.

0:26:18.200 --> 0:26:21.280
<v Speaker 2>That's why Trevor Lawrence and these guys last year, it's like, no,

0:26:21.359 --> 0:26:23.480
<v Speaker 2>I have a top five grade on them, Well let's

0:26:23.480 --> 0:26:26.199
<v Speaker 2>take them number one. That's pretty easy. But like with

0:26:26.280 --> 0:26:28.720
<v Speaker 2>these guys, it's you have that half ground inflation and

0:26:28.760 --> 0:26:30.880
<v Speaker 2>now it's now you get into the risk reward game.

0:26:31.080 --> 0:26:33.280
<v Speaker 2>Is how high do you take a guy like Willis?

0:26:33.320 --> 0:26:35.600
<v Speaker 2>Like I would never take them, like at the highest

0:26:35.600 --> 0:26:37.439
<v Speaker 2>I would take him as like the thirties, you know,

0:26:37.520 --> 0:26:39.920
<v Speaker 2>thirties or forties. But teams are sounding starting to take

0:26:39.960 --> 0:26:42.199
<v Speaker 2>sound like they take them to the lottery because of that

0:26:42.240 --> 0:26:45.080
<v Speaker 2>percentage of the star. That's what you're you're I think

0:26:45.119 --> 0:26:48.200
<v Speaker 2>the Josh Allen Patrick Mahomes playoff game broke people's brains

0:26:48.520 --> 0:26:51.320
<v Speaker 2>and now everyone's just like we need that, we need

0:26:51.359 --> 0:26:53.679
<v Speaker 2>that and it's like, yes, you do need that, but

0:26:53.720 --> 0:26:55.880
<v Speaker 2>you also need these guys to operate from the pocket

0:26:56.119 --> 0:26:58.640
<v Speaker 2>as well with the creation stuff. You need both now

0:26:58.800 --> 0:27:00.719
<v Speaker 2>like you need these guys need to be so superheroes. Now,

0:27:00.760 --> 0:27:03.800
<v Speaker 2>it's ridiculous what these quarterbacks can do, this new age

0:27:03.800 --> 0:27:06.159
<v Speaker 2>and these these mid twenties guys. But I don't know

0:27:06.200 --> 0:27:07.760
<v Speaker 2>if this is a long winded answer to say, like

0:27:07.800 --> 0:27:09.320
<v Speaker 2>you you have to take in the risk of where

0:27:09.320 --> 0:27:11.520
<v Speaker 2>you're taking the pick and understand what your situation is.

0:27:11.600 --> 0:27:15.320
<v Speaker 2>But I think everybody has that percentage that that bench,

0:27:15.440 --> 0:27:17.960
<v Speaker 2>that star, that started percent percentage different with each of

0:27:18.000 --> 0:27:19.680
<v Speaker 2>these guys. But that's just how I look at them.

0:27:19.960 --> 0:27:21.600
<v Speaker 2>Well and answer your question.

0:27:21.480 --> 0:27:23.280
<v Speaker 1>No, no, you did.

0:27:23.440 --> 0:27:23.720
<v Speaker 3>You did.

0:27:23.760 --> 0:27:26.119
<v Speaker 1>And I think you're you're sort of pushing up against

0:27:26.160 --> 0:27:29.720
<v Speaker 1>something else that you've been saying that really the consensus

0:27:29.760 --> 0:27:31.760
<v Speaker 1>for this draft that there is no consensus.

0:27:32.240 --> 0:27:33.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, at a lot of.

0:27:33.119 --> 0:27:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Positions, quarterback chief among them. We can talk about des Ritter.

0:27:37.320 --> 0:27:39.159
<v Speaker 1>You're really high on Deserritter. You' ranked him as your

0:27:39.200 --> 0:27:41.840
<v Speaker 1>top quarterback. And you know, this is one of those

0:27:41.880 --> 0:27:44.479
<v Speaker 1>things where I think for dumb dums like Dan and

0:27:44.520 --> 0:27:47.119
<v Speaker 1>I who aren't in the weeds we're not looking at

0:27:47.119 --> 0:27:49.399
<v Speaker 1>the video. We see what we see on Saturdays and

0:27:49.440 --> 0:27:51.720
<v Speaker 1>we kind of break it down from our chair here.

0:27:51.760 --> 0:27:54.720
<v Speaker 1>But we see des ridder and we say, Okay, there's

0:27:54.720 --> 0:27:57.560
<v Speaker 1>been an inconsistency in his game. We see desert to

0:27:57.560 --> 0:28:02.000
<v Speaker 1>throw behind guys, particularly games, as you rightfully pointed out,

0:28:02.320 --> 0:28:04.560
<v Speaker 1>you look at the tape and you say, well, in

0:28:04.600 --> 0:28:07.320
<v Speaker 1>some cases he's trying to throw behind him. In other cases,

0:28:07.359 --> 0:28:11.399
<v Speaker 1>maybe he's just jacked up early in the game. Desmond

0:28:11.440 --> 0:28:12.760
<v Speaker 1>Ritter is a guy that we've had her eye on

0:28:12.840 --> 0:28:15.040
<v Speaker 1>for quite some time. Obviously made the playoff this year,

0:28:15.080 --> 0:28:17.800
<v Speaker 1>had a really good season, really good career with Cincinnati.

0:28:18.000 --> 0:28:21.959
<v Speaker 1>What makes him your top quarterback prospect in twenty twenty two.

0:28:22.640 --> 0:28:25.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I've kind of called him the comedians comedian, Like

0:28:25.400 --> 0:28:29.159
<v Speaker 2>that's kind of what he's been, I'm telling you, Like

0:28:29.359 --> 0:28:31.600
<v Speaker 2>how you described him a little bit is what I

0:28:31.720 --> 0:28:34.119
<v Speaker 2>went into him as I barely watched him in twenty twenty,

0:28:34.760 --> 0:28:37.399
<v Speaker 2>Like I watched, you know, the game against Georgia, and

0:28:37.480 --> 0:28:39.920
<v Speaker 2>that was kind of like, oh, okay, he's fun. That's

0:28:39.920 --> 0:28:42.080
<v Speaker 2>how I looked at him. He's fun. There's difference between

0:28:42.120 --> 0:28:44.760
<v Speaker 2>good and fun though, and then when I watched him

0:28:44.800 --> 0:28:47.320
<v Speaker 2>in October, I would say October and November for the

0:28:47.320 --> 0:28:50.600
<v Speaker 2>first time on actual tape film all twenty two whatever

0:28:50.600 --> 0:28:54.719
<v Speaker 2>you want to call it, the cloud, thunder, exos, whatever,

0:28:54.840 --> 0:28:57.479
<v Speaker 2>whatever term I want to use for it. When I

0:28:57.520 --> 0:29:00.360
<v Speaker 2>watched him Alston, I was like, Oh shit, you actually

0:29:00.400 --> 0:29:03.000
<v Speaker 2>like process and you actually like do all the little

0:29:03.040 --> 0:29:05.520
<v Speaker 2>things that is needed in the NFL. We talk about

0:29:05.520 --> 0:29:07.200
<v Speaker 2>all the creation stuff you need that you need to

0:29:07.200 --> 0:29:08.640
<v Speaker 2>be able to create. Go get a bucket as the

0:29:08.680 --> 0:29:10.920
<v Speaker 2>term I use, but also you need to be able

0:29:10.960 --> 0:29:13.160
<v Speaker 2>to do the stuff in the pocket. And the fact

0:29:13.200 --> 0:29:15.640
<v Speaker 2>that I've seen him create throughout his career, that was

0:29:15.680 --> 0:29:18.000
<v Speaker 2>what I knew him as as an athlete, as a

0:29:18.000 --> 0:29:20.000
<v Speaker 2>guy that can go. I mean like, I was not

0:29:20.040 --> 0:29:22.160
<v Speaker 2>surprised by his forty time because I've seen this guy

0:29:22.160 --> 0:29:24.760
<v Speaker 2>turn on the jets and pull away from everybody, and

0:29:24.800 --> 0:29:27.160
<v Speaker 2>then all of a sudden, I'm watching him against Indiana.

0:29:27.200 --> 0:29:30.400
<v Speaker 2>The's point protections out and he's moving guys and not

0:29:30.600 --> 0:29:32.640
<v Speaker 2>just like killing a play where they go from run

0:29:32.680 --> 0:29:35.040
<v Speaker 2>to pass play, but actually telling the center, Hey you

0:29:35.040 --> 0:29:37.760
<v Speaker 2>have the point over there. I'm switching the point over here. Hey,

0:29:37.800 --> 0:29:40.160
<v Speaker 2>Jerome Ford running back, you got that guy and then

0:29:40.200 --> 0:29:42.600
<v Speaker 2>snap the ball and deliver a pass. And that's what

0:29:42.800 --> 0:29:45.040
<v Speaker 2>it kind of perked me up. I seeing him do

0:29:45.120 --> 0:29:46.800
<v Speaker 2>that over and over. This is all theory. You talk

0:29:46.800 --> 0:29:48.080
<v Speaker 2>to a lot of these quarterbacks. They got on the

0:29:48.080 --> 0:29:50.560
<v Speaker 2>whiteboard and they can draw it up then go oh,

0:29:50.560 --> 0:29:52.680
<v Speaker 2>I changed the protection and I do all that, and

0:29:52.720 --> 0:29:54.680
<v Speaker 2>as soon as the bullets start flying, they do not

0:29:54.760 --> 0:29:58.400
<v Speaker 2>do that. They just go ready, go snap, I'm throwing

0:29:58.400 --> 0:30:00.760
<v Speaker 2>the ball. Like. But with Ritter, he was so calm

0:30:00.800 --> 0:30:03.640
<v Speaker 2>in this processing, post pre am, post snap that I

0:30:03.720 --> 0:30:05.920
<v Speaker 2>was like, That's what really turned me on to him.

0:30:06.640 --> 0:30:09.280
<v Speaker 2>I know. That's my theory is I's so amped up.

0:30:09.280 --> 0:30:10.880
<v Speaker 2>That's also about why I liked him, though, is that

0:30:10.920 --> 0:30:13.400
<v Speaker 2>he's so competitive and I can tell that he is

0:30:13.480 --> 0:30:16.160
<v Speaker 2>just how he everything, Like when a ball gets badded

0:30:16.160 --> 0:30:17.720
<v Speaker 2>down or he misses a throat, you could see him

0:30:17.720 --> 0:30:19.440
<v Speaker 2>just kind of go like he's not blaming the receiver

0:30:19.520 --> 0:30:21.480
<v Speaker 2>or anything. I've seen the receivers drop balls for him

0:30:21.600 --> 0:30:23.360
<v Speaker 2>and he's mad at himself because he's like, oh, I

0:30:23.360 --> 0:30:25.239
<v Speaker 2>should put it perfect. I was like, okay, that's kind

0:30:25.240 --> 0:30:27.160
<v Speaker 2>of cool. Like and I've seen something with you where

0:30:27.160 --> 0:30:29.680
<v Speaker 2>he's miked up and he's he was running away from

0:30:29.680 --> 0:30:31.080
<v Speaker 2>a teammate and the team was like, oh, I would

0:30:31.080 --> 0:30:33.160
<v Speaker 2>have caught you. And then he's like muttering to himself

0:30:33.160 --> 0:30:34.600
<v Speaker 2>back He's like, no, you wouldn't have No, you want

0:30:34.600 --> 0:30:36.960
<v Speaker 2>to And I was like, okay, this, this psycho robot

0:30:37.080 --> 0:30:39.360
<v Speaker 2>is my guy. Like I like this. So a lot

0:30:39.360 --> 0:30:42.040
<v Speaker 2>of the mentality that he has, the fact that he

0:30:42.160 --> 0:30:44.920
<v Speaker 2>is has improved, much like a Joe Burrow has where

0:30:44.920 --> 0:30:46.920
<v Speaker 2>they just took a huge leap from one year to

0:30:47.000 --> 0:30:49.080
<v Speaker 2>the next, as far as how he works in the pocket,

0:30:49.440 --> 0:30:51.720
<v Speaker 2>how he is processing. Decides like, okay, so you have

0:30:51.760 --> 0:30:53.640
<v Speaker 2>a you want to get better. That's what you have

0:30:53.760 --> 0:30:56.440
<v Speaker 2>as a pro. You are your own coach. You want

0:30:56.480 --> 0:30:59.240
<v Speaker 2>to make yourself better. That's what all the best of

0:30:59.280 --> 0:31:01.320
<v Speaker 2>the best, they just the Dak Prescott's of the world.

0:31:01.360 --> 0:31:03.720
<v Speaker 2>They are psychos. All right, I'm gonna spend this much

0:31:03.720 --> 0:31:05.480
<v Speaker 2>money to like make sure I can do you know,

0:31:05.520 --> 0:31:07.800
<v Speaker 2>the hit movements right and get the footwork right. I

0:31:07.800 --> 0:31:09.760
<v Speaker 2>can already see that kind of wiring with Ritter, and

0:31:09.800 --> 0:31:12.240
<v Speaker 2>so that's why I really liked him. The accuracy stuff

0:31:12.440 --> 0:31:14.320
<v Speaker 2>you brought it up. I do think the early stuff

0:31:14.400 --> 0:31:17.320
<v Speaker 2>is because he's amped up, but also his foot work

0:31:17.360 --> 0:31:19.720
<v Speaker 2>stuffs still little bit inconsistent, so he can, you know,

0:31:19.800 --> 0:31:22.760
<v Speaker 2>overstride and he'll miss high and the ball just zooms.

0:31:22.760 --> 0:31:25.360
<v Speaker 2>And that's the thing. His misses are bad, like they

0:31:26.400 --> 0:31:28.200
<v Speaker 2>go ten yards over a guy's head and it's like,

0:31:28.200 --> 0:31:30.480
<v Speaker 2>oh boy, Desman, come on, come on, come on, hone in,

0:31:30.640 --> 0:31:33.440
<v Speaker 2>hone in. We're good. But I do like that he's

0:31:33.480 --> 0:31:35.160
<v Speaker 2>able to attack all three levels of the field. He

0:31:35.240 --> 0:31:39.320
<v Speaker 2>runs true drop back concepts, which is rare at the

0:31:39.320 --> 0:31:41.960
<v Speaker 2>college level to see him that run that well, he's

0:31:42.000 --> 0:31:44.240
<v Speaker 2>sitting deep passes like he's doing a lot of same

0:31:44.240 --> 0:31:46.360
<v Speaker 2>throws that like Stafford was not like to that level

0:31:46.360 --> 0:31:48.520
<v Speaker 2>where he's doing trick shots and stuff. But as far

0:31:48.560 --> 0:31:51.400
<v Speaker 2>as like as he's processing, he's getting to backside reads.

0:31:51.840 --> 0:31:54.760
<v Speaker 2>That stuff is tangible, That stuff translates, and so that's

0:31:54.760 --> 0:31:58.280
<v Speaker 2>why we do the star starter stuff. His star percentage

0:31:58.520 --> 0:32:01.040
<v Speaker 2>might be as high, but a starter percentage is a

0:32:01.120 --> 0:32:03.520
<v Speaker 2>huge chunk, bigger than I think a lot of these

0:32:03.520 --> 0:32:04.520
<v Speaker 2>other guys in this class.

0:32:05.520 --> 0:32:07.480
<v Speaker 3>I want to stick with concepts. And I don't know

0:32:07.480 --> 0:32:11.560
<v Speaker 3>if this is specifically draft related, but because you're watching

0:32:11.640 --> 0:32:15.320
<v Speaker 3>so much, and because you're watching so many varied styles

0:32:15.880 --> 0:32:18.560
<v Speaker 3>and because we know on a certain level, scheme and

0:32:18.640 --> 0:32:21.320
<v Speaker 3>concept sometimes trickles up high school level to college to

0:32:21.400 --> 0:32:24.160
<v Speaker 3>pro whether it's you know, jet motion or RPOs, things

0:32:24.200 --> 0:32:27.200
<v Speaker 3>tend to go in that direction at least sometimes are

0:32:27.240 --> 0:32:30.920
<v Speaker 3>there specific schools? Are there, specific systems? Are there specific concepts?

0:32:31.240 --> 0:32:35.160
<v Speaker 3>Are there specific coaches that do things that you're like, Hey,

0:32:35.200 --> 0:32:38.240
<v Speaker 3>that's a fun and weird thing that this team is doing. Hey,

0:32:38.320 --> 0:32:41.000
<v Speaker 3>it's interesting how they stack the plays on this drive

0:32:41.080 --> 0:32:43.360
<v Speaker 3>to like work off of each other. Or it's interesting

0:32:43.360 --> 0:32:45.760
<v Speaker 3>how they used this sort of h BAC or this

0:32:45.800 --> 0:32:48.160
<v Speaker 3>sort of you know, guy in the slot. Is there

0:32:48.240 --> 0:32:51.280
<v Speaker 3>that team or those or are there those coaches that

0:32:51.320 --> 0:32:53.520
<v Speaker 3>you're like, I don't know, this is kind of like

0:32:53.560 --> 0:32:55.520
<v Speaker 3>a fun little situation brewing here.

0:32:55.960 --> 0:32:58.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. One of the most fun watches from me was

0:32:58.720 --> 0:33:02.560
<v Speaker 2>South Dakota State, Okay, and I believe that OC went

0:33:02.600 --> 0:33:05.400
<v Speaker 2>to Idaho. I think he did or something of that sort.

0:33:05.480 --> 0:33:08.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure, but that offense was like a fever dream,

0:33:08.920 --> 0:33:11.760
<v Speaker 2>like they had like six different versions of QB sneaks

0:33:11.800 --> 0:33:13.880
<v Speaker 2>and like fake TV snakes. I know it was. I

0:33:14.080 --> 0:33:15.800
<v Speaker 2>had to watch the running back Pierce Straw and I

0:33:15.840 --> 0:33:17.880
<v Speaker 2>was watching that offense. I was like, this is kind

0:33:17.880 --> 0:33:21.920
<v Speaker 2>of fun. Coastal Carolina does a lot of goofy fun stuff. Yeah,

0:33:21.960 --> 0:33:24.160
<v Speaker 2>and that one again, that one's like a fever dream.

0:33:24.160 --> 0:33:26.280
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna use the same the same adage for that

0:33:26.320 --> 0:33:29.120
<v Speaker 2>because that one is like they it's almost like a

0:33:29.160 --> 0:33:32.600
<v Speaker 2>triple option offense, but it's not. It's like it's it's weird.

0:33:32.920 --> 0:33:35.880
<v Speaker 2>They just do everything, but they do like but it

0:33:35.920 --> 0:33:38.280
<v Speaker 2>makes sense. Like their guys are really well coached. That's what.

0:33:38.440 --> 0:33:41.120
<v Speaker 2>They're a very fun unit to watch. I get they're winning,

0:33:41.160 --> 0:33:42.959
<v Speaker 2>so obviously that he was, but they do a lot

0:33:43.000 --> 0:33:47.120
<v Speaker 2>of fun stuff. Also Louisiana Lafayette, which is just also

0:33:47.160 --> 0:33:49.520
<v Speaker 2>they just do a lot of sound stuff. I would

0:33:49.560 --> 0:33:52.880
<v Speaker 2>say on the defensive front, what Derek Mason did at

0:33:52.840 --> 0:33:56.440
<v Speaker 2>Aupera and actually like flash some like really uh like

0:33:56.480 --> 0:33:59.520
<v Speaker 2>some cool stuff. He was the defense coordinator left right, Yeah,

0:33:59.560 --> 0:34:01.080
<v Speaker 2>and that was kind of and that's just me as

0:34:01.200 --> 0:34:03.600
<v Speaker 2>like watching I was watching offensive guys, but I would

0:34:03.600 --> 0:34:06.600
<v Speaker 2>watch them go against aubres defense and I realized that

0:34:06.600 --> 0:34:08.879
<v Speaker 2>their defense was up and down, so I maybe caught

0:34:08.920 --> 0:34:10.920
<v Speaker 2>three good games of it. But he was doing some

0:34:10.920 --> 0:34:13.200
<v Speaker 2>sweet stuff on defense and just more again this is

0:34:13.239 --> 0:34:15.920
<v Speaker 2>more just soundness and and and there's a couple of

0:34:15.920 --> 0:34:18.920
<v Speaker 2>plays that have been stolen already, So I wish I

0:34:18.920 --> 0:34:20.759
<v Speaker 2>could be like, oh, yeah, we're gonna steal I could

0:34:20.760 --> 0:34:22.719
<v Speaker 2>see this one coming into the NFL. I would say

0:34:22.760 --> 0:34:26.040
<v Speaker 2>some of the stuff that might be matriculating to the

0:34:26.160 --> 0:34:28.960
<v Speaker 2>NFL is some of the motion stuff with RPOs where

0:34:29.000 --> 0:34:31.799
<v Speaker 2>people just more grab back stuff that they can pull

0:34:31.840 --> 0:34:34.480
<v Speaker 2>from in the NFL level where they just maybe have

0:34:34.560 --> 0:34:37.680
<v Speaker 2>a guy in motion and reading the flat there. Cincinnati

0:34:37.719 --> 0:34:40.080
<v Speaker 2>doesn't play. I've seen the Texans run this when when

0:34:40.120 --> 0:34:43.440
<v Speaker 2>Deshaun Watson and Bill O'Brien were there. I don't even

0:34:43.440 --> 0:34:46.200
<v Speaker 2>if I could say Deshaun Watson's name, but they run this.

0:34:46.440 --> 0:34:50.479
<v Speaker 2>They run this just this RPO where it's it's zone read,

0:34:50.719 --> 0:34:54.200
<v Speaker 2>but then the tight end is what in a run sense,

0:34:54.200 --> 0:34:56.160
<v Speaker 2>it's called split zone where they kick out the backside

0:34:56.200 --> 0:34:58.279
<v Speaker 2>d N but they don't block him and he just

0:34:58.360 --> 0:35:01.640
<v Speaker 2>runs to the flat. And it's such a simple play.

0:35:02.040 --> 0:35:05.600
<v Speaker 2>So basically you're creating as a naked bootleg as well

0:35:05.640 --> 0:35:08.879
<v Speaker 2>with the zone read all in one play. And I'm

0:35:09.080 --> 0:35:11.800
<v Speaker 2>shocked teams haven't stolen this because at the end of

0:35:11.880 --> 0:35:14.920
<v Speaker 2>NFL you can do this because the offensive line can't

0:35:14.920 --> 0:35:18.120
<v Speaker 2>get downfield on this one. So I've only seen one

0:35:18.239 --> 0:35:20.160
<v Speaker 2>NFL team really run it. I've seen the Chiefs run

0:35:20.200 --> 0:35:22.440
<v Speaker 2>it maybe once. But I'm wait for teams to run

0:35:22.440 --> 0:35:25.080
<v Speaker 2>that more because that thing is stealing. Like the Cincinnati

0:35:25.200 --> 0:35:27.240
<v Speaker 2>ran that like twelve times a game. It was awesome.

0:35:27.320 --> 0:35:29.520
<v Speaker 2>It was just like run his zone, drone forward going

0:35:29.520 --> 0:35:31.800
<v Speaker 2>for fifteen yards, or we're just gonna throw it to

0:35:31.840 --> 0:35:34.359
<v Speaker 2>the tight end in the flat for an eight yard since. Yeah,

0:35:34.400 --> 0:35:36.480
<v Speaker 2>it was like the easiest play. But wait for that

0:35:36.520 --> 0:35:39.440
<v Speaker 2>one to get maybe proliferate more throughout the league.

0:35:39.800 --> 0:35:42.239
<v Speaker 3>Did you have any at least to your eyes, accidental

0:35:42.239 --> 0:35:45.719
<v Speaker 3>discoveries along the way as you were watching player, a quarterback,

0:35:45.760 --> 0:35:48.399
<v Speaker 3>a and You're like, who is this receiver or who

0:35:48.480 --> 0:35:51.120
<v Speaker 3>is this right tackle? Who is just smothering dudes? Like

0:35:51.280 --> 0:35:53.160
<v Speaker 3>I guess it's the old Aaron Rodgers story, right. Jeff

0:35:53.200 --> 0:35:55.799
<v Speaker 3>Tedford went to the JC to look at a tight

0:35:55.880 --> 0:35:56.360
<v Speaker 3>end and he was.

0:35:56.360 --> 0:35:58.880
<v Speaker 2>Like, who is this quarterback in there?

0:35:59.160 --> 0:36:02.080
<v Speaker 3>Who is? Yeah? Do have any like surprise pops really

0:36:02.320 --> 0:36:04.080
<v Speaker 3>either side of the ball? You know, if the safety

0:36:04.080 --> 0:36:06.279
<v Speaker 3>pops or a right tackle or a receiver, who are you?

0:36:06.520 --> 0:36:08.480
<v Speaker 3>Who are your surprise, pops, and they don't even have

0:36:08.520 --> 0:36:10.520
<v Speaker 3>to be in this year's draft class. But don't jumped

0:36:10.520 --> 0:36:10.960
<v Speaker 3>out to you.

0:36:11.239 --> 0:36:14.000
<v Speaker 2>Oh easily, it's Will Levis or Leavis. I'm not making

0:36:14.040 --> 0:36:14.520
<v Speaker 2>sure it was safe.

0:36:15.200 --> 0:36:18.160
<v Speaker 3>I have a question about Will left Levis curiosity.

0:36:18.200 --> 0:36:20.000
<v Speaker 1>I went down to Will Levis question continue.

0:36:20.040 --> 0:36:22.880
<v Speaker 2>I'm sorry, yeah, no, no, it's uh. I'm excited to

0:36:22.880 --> 0:36:25.239
<v Speaker 2>talk about him, and I kind of dropped drop hints

0:36:25.280 --> 0:36:27.680
<v Speaker 2>on him. Yeah, I was stunned. I was watching Wendelle

0:36:27.719 --> 0:36:31.520
<v Speaker 2>Robinson the receiver, and I liked him. I compared him

0:36:31.520 --> 0:36:34.680
<v Speaker 2>to Cole Beasley, which I was pretty proud of. So

0:36:34.880 --> 0:36:36.400
<v Speaker 2>watching him and all of a sudden, I'm seeing this

0:36:36.440 --> 0:36:38.440
<v Speaker 2>quarterback and it was it was the Georgia game. It

0:36:38.440 --> 0:36:41.719
<v Speaker 2>was the first my first exposure to him and ball

0:36:41.880 --> 0:36:44.120
<v Speaker 2>just popping out of his hand and I was like, okay,

0:36:44.120 --> 0:36:46.200
<v Speaker 2>that's pretty interesting. You throw it kind of funky because

0:36:46.239 --> 0:36:48.560
<v Speaker 2>he like he does everything really quick, like it's just

0:36:49.040 --> 0:36:50.960
<v Speaker 2>like its just the ball just comes out. And I

0:36:51.080 --> 0:36:53.960
<v Speaker 2>was really surprising me. But he was big, he was

0:36:54.000 --> 0:36:57.120
<v Speaker 2>scrambled around, he was running over guys. I was stunned

0:36:57.120 --> 0:36:58.960
<v Speaker 2>how much I liked him. I watched a couple other games.

0:36:59.000 --> 0:37:00.879
<v Speaker 2>Iguinst Iowa. I think it the Bowl game, I think

0:37:00.920 --> 0:37:03.680
<v Speaker 2>another game in between there, and I was like, okay,

0:37:03.800 --> 0:37:05.759
<v Speaker 2>like there's something to this guy. It's one of those

0:37:05.760 --> 0:37:07.399
<v Speaker 2>where I'm like, I'm gonna keep a tab on you

0:37:07.719 --> 0:37:10.200
<v Speaker 2>see how you grow this next year. But he was

0:37:10.280 --> 0:37:12.759
<v Speaker 2>one that shocked me. I actually was like, are you

0:37:12.840 --> 0:37:15.279
<v Speaker 2>draft eligible? What's what's double check? Make sure? But he's

0:37:15.280 --> 0:37:17.319
<v Speaker 2>coming back for another year. So but yeah, that one

0:37:17.360 --> 0:37:19.360
<v Speaker 2>was out of nowhere. I couldn't believe how much I

0:37:19.440 --> 0:37:19.759
<v Speaker 2>liked him.

0:37:20.200 --> 0:37:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I so I'm a pen stater. I don't have

0:37:22.160 --> 0:37:22.440
<v Speaker 1>your f oh.

0:37:22.440 --> 0:37:25.520
<v Speaker 2>Okay, yes, I don't have a free person always just

0:37:25.560 --> 0:37:27.600
<v Speaker 2>does this. I want to have this.

0:37:27.680 --> 0:37:30.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm a pen stater. I'm familiar with Will's early discography,

0:37:31.440 --> 0:37:34.640
<v Speaker 1>and needless to say, it was a little underwhelming. Part

0:37:34.680 --> 0:37:36.120
<v Speaker 1>of that could have been the system he was in.

0:37:36.160 --> 0:37:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Obviously a lot better under Liam Cohen and Kentucky, and

0:37:39.480 --> 0:37:42.919
<v Speaker 1>plenty of room to grow this year. But I will admit, Nate,

0:37:43.080 --> 0:37:45.480
<v Speaker 1>when I saw you had some first round steam on

0:37:45.560 --> 0:37:48.600
<v Speaker 1>him on your Twitter, I was like, Ooh, I need

0:37:48.640 --> 0:37:50.640
<v Speaker 1>to make sure I'm fastened to this chair right now.

0:37:50.800 --> 0:37:52.000
<v Speaker 1>I did not see that coming.

0:37:52.560 --> 0:37:54.200
<v Speaker 2>This and this is where I'm telling you, I get

0:37:54.200 --> 0:37:56.120
<v Speaker 2>this exposure to guys like this is the same thing

0:37:56.120 --> 0:37:58.160
<v Speaker 2>with happening me with Ritter. I was like, I, I've

0:37:58.160 --> 0:38:00.200
<v Speaker 2>never heard of this guy, Like I watched him play

0:38:00.200 --> 0:38:02.319
<v Speaker 2>once and then, so it's kind of fun. So some

0:38:02.400 --> 0:38:05.239
<v Speaker 2>of that, like like you said the early discography, like

0:38:05.320 --> 0:38:07.160
<v Speaker 2>I didn't, I don't. I didn't. I didn't hear that.

0:38:07.080 --> 0:38:08.759
<v Speaker 1>Album Ate Baggage though.

0:38:08.920 --> 0:38:11.279
<v Speaker 2>No, I just heard the mixtape and I was like, hey,

0:38:11.360 --> 0:38:14.040
<v Speaker 2>he was featured on this song and it was pretty good.

0:38:14.239 --> 0:38:16.120
<v Speaker 2>Like I liked him on that feature, So maybe I'm

0:38:16.120 --> 0:38:18.680
<v Speaker 2>gonna check out his his whole album. And that's that's

0:38:19.480 --> 0:38:21.000
<v Speaker 2>and I could see him like even if you look

0:38:21.000 --> 0:38:23.320
<v Speaker 2>at his stats, he's like I think, like twenty four touchdowns,

0:38:23.320 --> 0:38:25.839
<v Speaker 2>he still had twelve picks and you can still see

0:38:25.840 --> 0:38:28.120
<v Speaker 2>some dummy in them. So that's why he's not perfect.

0:38:28.120 --> 0:38:30.160
<v Speaker 2>But it was like, that's it's the flashes of him.

0:38:30.320 --> 0:38:32.160
<v Speaker 2>So I but every Penn State person I've talked to

0:38:32.320 --> 0:38:35.160
<v Speaker 2>has just gone, man, he he was like Taysom Hill

0:38:35.239 --> 0:38:37.000
<v Speaker 2>when we had him, Like he was just some run

0:38:37.040 --> 0:38:39.040
<v Speaker 2>he was just some run around gadget guy. And so

0:38:39.200 --> 0:38:41.600
<v Speaker 2>that's that's what's interesting. That he's I've heard that he's

0:38:41.600 --> 0:38:43.800
<v Speaker 2>worked with a coach just like Ritter has, where he's

0:38:44.040 --> 0:38:46.000
<v Speaker 2>really like a private coach where he's really worked on

0:38:46.040 --> 0:38:47.960
<v Speaker 2>his all of his pocket stuff. So maybe some of

0:38:48.000 --> 0:38:50.439
<v Speaker 2>that stuff's coming to fruition with him. He might drop

0:38:50.480 --> 0:38:52.600
<v Speaker 2>off the face of the ear who knows it doesn't

0:38:52.760 --> 0:38:54.279
<v Speaker 2>stuff so hard, But you.

0:38:54.280 --> 0:38:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Know you bring that up, right, so you know, I'm

0:38:56.000 --> 0:38:58.319
<v Speaker 1>sure you've gotten the commentary from Penn State people. And

0:38:58.400 --> 0:39:02.120
<v Speaker 1>if we expanded out not just Will Levis, but like

0:39:03.360 --> 0:39:06.719
<v Speaker 1>draft time, when you're evaluating talent, it's got to be

0:39:06.880 --> 0:39:11.600
<v Speaker 1>a massive exercise in avoiding group think because, especially now

0:39:11.680 --> 0:39:13.719
<v Speaker 1>in the media world, everybody's trying to get clicks. You

0:39:13.760 --> 0:39:15.960
<v Speaker 1>know this now, right like everybody's trying to get clicks.

0:39:15.960 --> 0:39:19.359
<v Speaker 1>Everyone's trying to have the hot take that makes their

0:39:19.400 --> 0:39:23.040
<v Speaker 1>stuff pop, makes their star rise a little bit. For

0:39:23.160 --> 0:39:26.640
<v Speaker 1>lack of better terms, like, how do you avoid those

0:39:26.680 --> 0:39:30.200
<v Speaker 1>pitfalls and sort of come to your own conclusion when

0:39:30.239 --> 0:39:32.680
<v Speaker 1>there is so much out there I saw today, I

0:39:32.760 --> 0:39:35.520
<v Speaker 1>mean I looked at a couple different mock drafts even

0:39:35.560 --> 0:39:39.080
<v Speaker 1>before this interview. There really is no consensus. People think

0:39:39.080 --> 0:39:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Aiden Hutchinson's the number one pick. But there's like fifteen

0:39:42.560 --> 0:39:46.000
<v Speaker 1>other opinions out there. How difficult is it? Give voice

0:39:46.000 --> 0:39:49.120
<v Speaker 1>to how difficult it might be to kind of formulate

0:39:49.200 --> 0:39:51.360
<v Speaker 1>your own opinion in this time where there are so

0:39:51.480 --> 0:39:52.360
<v Speaker 1>many to go around.

0:39:52.800 --> 0:39:55.200
<v Speaker 2>No, And that's a great point to make, or a

0:39:55.640 --> 0:39:58.799
<v Speaker 2>great question run is just do the work and come

0:39:58.840 --> 0:40:01.560
<v Speaker 2>to your own come to your own conclusions, like yes,

0:40:02.080 --> 0:40:03.879
<v Speaker 2>and I'll be a liar if I said I don't.

0:40:04.040 --> 0:40:06.000
<v Speaker 2>If I ignore the noise and I don't look at

0:40:06.040 --> 0:40:08.279
<v Speaker 2>what other people are saying that, I'm not going to

0:40:08.440 --> 0:40:10.240
<v Speaker 2>sit here and lie to you and say I don't.

0:40:10.440 --> 0:40:12.920
<v Speaker 2>I say, for me, is you kind of go okay,

0:40:12.960 --> 0:40:14.600
<v Speaker 2>this is where these guys are kind of in the

0:40:14.680 --> 0:40:17.439
<v Speaker 2>area that they're in. Okay, people are kind of talking

0:40:17.440 --> 0:40:19.120
<v Speaker 2>about this guy as the first rounder. But for me,

0:40:19.800 --> 0:40:21.520
<v Speaker 2>how I just go about it is yeah, just doing

0:40:21.560 --> 0:40:24.399
<v Speaker 2>the work and that kind of leads to its own

0:40:24.440 --> 0:40:27.200
<v Speaker 2>conclusions and that this is just for me and just

0:40:27.239 --> 0:40:31.040
<v Speaker 2>like having my own statement on something. That's why I

0:40:31.040 --> 0:40:32.840
<v Speaker 2>think I was I was really early my love for

0:40:32.960 --> 0:40:35.200
<v Speaker 2>Desmond Ridder was I just wanted to be like, hey,

0:40:35.520 --> 0:40:37.399
<v Speaker 2>this is funny that I say I'm going to I'll

0:40:37.400 --> 0:40:41.000
<v Speaker 2>admit to trying to form that internet dopamine as well,

0:40:41.400 --> 0:40:44.239
<v Speaker 2>is going like, hey, this is my guy that I'm

0:40:44.280 --> 0:40:46.360
<v Speaker 2>playing my flag on, Desmond Ridder because I wanted to

0:40:46.400 --> 0:40:48.720
<v Speaker 2>just go I'm not a Johnny come Lately. I'm watching

0:40:48.760 --> 0:40:50.759
<v Speaker 2>him and this is what I think after watching all

0:40:50.760 --> 0:40:53.160
<v Speaker 2>these top guys. And so there's a little bit that

0:40:53.200 --> 0:40:55.200
<v Speaker 2>where you have to do that to stand out. Otherwise

0:40:55.200 --> 0:40:57.799
<v Speaker 2>people just go, oh, you just you're you're just crowdsourcing.

0:40:57.960 --> 0:40:59.879
<v Speaker 2>You know, You're you're just taking what everybody else.

0:41:00.200 --> 0:41:01.400
<v Speaker 1>No situation for you.

0:41:01.480 --> 0:41:04.560
<v Speaker 2>It really is, it really is. And but that's for

0:41:04.680 --> 0:41:07.080
<v Speaker 2>me is just trying to do the work and watch

0:41:07.200 --> 0:41:09.319
<v Speaker 2>actually watching these guys and taking the notes and just

0:41:09.360 --> 0:41:12.160
<v Speaker 2>going like this is what how I feel like I

0:41:12.360 --> 0:41:15.680
<v Speaker 2>everybody's gonna have their own personal biases, you know, with

0:41:15.680 --> 0:41:18.360
<v Speaker 2>with these guys and going like, I have a certain

0:41:18.400 --> 0:41:20.880
<v Speaker 2>like a receiver. I love big ball winners like I

0:41:21.000 --> 0:41:23.320
<v Speaker 2>just do. I I like size at my at the

0:41:23.360 --> 0:41:26.520
<v Speaker 2>receiver position, actually really every position. That's just what I

0:41:26.560 --> 0:41:28.680
<v Speaker 2>have liked. That's a In the NFL, a lot of

0:41:28.680 --> 0:41:32.480
<v Speaker 2>stuff becomes durability question marks. Like that's why people always go, wow,

0:41:32.480 --> 0:41:34.520
<v Speaker 2>why did this guy making the NFL? Well he's probably

0:41:34.520 --> 0:41:37.320
<v Speaker 2>five nine one eight, Like you know that that doesn't

0:41:37.320 --> 0:41:39.680
<v Speaker 2>hold off in the NFL once you're a freak. But

0:41:39.800 --> 0:41:42.279
<v Speaker 2>that's where I I that's why I'm gonna have my

0:41:42.320 --> 0:41:44.719
<v Speaker 2>own personal biases. But I'm always going to just go like, well,

0:41:45.000 --> 0:41:47.480
<v Speaker 2>you know, the stat people really like this guy. All Right,

0:41:47.480 --> 0:41:49.279
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna take him. I'm gonna give him a second look.

0:41:49.480 --> 0:41:51.920
<v Speaker 2>Oh this guy ran a four three eight at the combine.

0:41:51.960 --> 0:41:53.600
<v Speaker 2>Well you know I have a second round grade on him.

0:41:53.719 --> 0:41:55.759
<v Speaker 2>All right, I'll take a second look. So that's really

0:41:55.760 --> 0:41:57.719
<v Speaker 2>it's just we're all going to have our own processes

0:41:57.760 --> 0:42:00.279
<v Speaker 2>for it. But that's just mine doing the work. He's

0:42:00.360 --> 0:42:02.960
<v Speaker 2>just taken all the data points. But also real quick

0:42:03.040 --> 0:42:05.120
<v Speaker 2>is that you're saying there's no consensus. I actually think

0:42:05.120 --> 0:42:07.120
<v Speaker 2>that's what makes it so fun for this draft class.

0:42:07.120 --> 0:42:09.520
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, because it's going like, all right, what do

0:42:09.560 --> 0:42:12.880
<v Speaker 2>you see? Like what everybody's it's eye of the beholder always.

0:42:13.120 --> 0:42:14.920
<v Speaker 2>But now as opposed to like last year we had

0:42:14.960 --> 0:42:17.640
<v Speaker 2>so many blue chip, true blue chip guys, this year

0:42:17.680 --> 0:42:19.600
<v Speaker 2>it's more going like a right, who's seeing the right

0:42:19.680 --> 0:42:22.200
<v Speaker 2>things or is making the best educated guesses?

0:42:23.040 --> 0:42:26.080
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned your own kind of bias towards size in

0:42:26.120 --> 0:42:28.799
<v Speaker 1>the NFL, I want to talk about some of the

0:42:28.840 --> 0:42:31.239
<v Speaker 1>other skill positions if they could quickly before we.

0:42:31.239 --> 0:42:31.640
<v Speaker 3>Let you go.

0:42:31.719 --> 0:42:34.880
<v Speaker 1>But especially on the receiver side. I heard a recent

0:42:34.880 --> 0:42:38.200
<v Speaker 1>show you did with Robert and you talk about Drake

0:42:38.280 --> 0:42:40.719
<v Speaker 1>London as your top receiver and you like him because

0:42:40.719 --> 0:42:43.440
<v Speaker 1>he's got the size. He won what was it, nineteen

0:42:44.200 --> 0:42:48.120
<v Speaker 1>fifty to fifty balls, some ridiculous percentage, right, He's clearly

0:42:48.120 --> 0:42:50.000
<v Speaker 1>a freak. On the flip side, you've got a guy

0:42:50.040 --> 0:42:52.520
<v Speaker 1>like a Chris a Lave who is smaller but seems

0:42:52.560 --> 0:42:54.520
<v Speaker 1>to be a really gifted root runner, could find his

0:42:55.160 --> 0:42:57.920
<v Speaker 1>place in the NFL because of that. I'm curious to

0:42:57.920 --> 0:43:00.239
<v Speaker 1>get more of a breakdown of that wide receiver possition

0:43:00.360 --> 0:43:03.360
<v Speaker 1>because you know, when it comes to draft day, it

0:43:03.440 --> 0:43:06.200
<v Speaker 1>is a position that is much talked about. We see

0:43:06.200 --> 0:43:10.799
<v Speaker 1>these guys out there on game day every Saturday. How

0:43:10.840 --> 0:43:13.279
<v Speaker 1>that game translates to the NFL, at least for me

0:43:13.440 --> 0:43:16.160
<v Speaker 1>personally as a college football fan, I've always had a

0:43:16.200 --> 0:43:18.520
<v Speaker 1>really hard time figuring out who's gonna pop at the

0:43:18.600 --> 0:43:20.799
<v Speaker 1>next level and who isn't. How do you kind of

0:43:20.840 --> 0:43:22.320
<v Speaker 1>do that calculus from your side?

0:43:22.719 --> 0:43:24.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and a lot of it is. This is where

0:43:24.880 --> 0:43:27.839
<v Speaker 2>tape because receivers is some of these guys get six

0:43:27.920 --> 0:43:30.799
<v Speaker 2>targets in a game, and if you only watch those

0:43:30.800 --> 0:43:34.479
<v Speaker 2>six targets, you're missing out on sixty other plays where

0:43:34.920 --> 0:43:36.719
<v Speaker 2>you can get something from these guys where they're just

0:43:36.800 --> 0:43:39.040
<v Speaker 2>running a route but not getting to target. And you

0:43:39.040 --> 0:43:41.920
<v Speaker 2>can see them working against press or working a route

0:43:41.920 --> 0:43:43.680
<v Speaker 2>that they haven't gotten the ball on, but you can

0:43:43.719 --> 0:43:46.360
<v Speaker 2>see them running that type of route of the route tree.

0:43:47.200 --> 0:43:49.480
<v Speaker 2>So that's where you know, watching these guys really comes

0:43:49.560 --> 0:43:52.239
<v Speaker 2>up also seeing their effort and blocking. And I know

0:43:52.280 --> 0:43:55.360
<v Speaker 2>that sounds like, Oh, I think I've won some people

0:43:55.400 --> 0:43:57.759
<v Speaker 2>over on it on our show because they thought it

0:43:57.800 --> 0:43:59.520
<v Speaker 2>was just like oh coaching, Like, ah, you're just an

0:43:59.560 --> 0:44:02.200
<v Speaker 2>old coach. I talks about it matters. It really matters

0:44:02.239 --> 0:44:04.480
<v Speaker 2>because if you want to be in three wide receivers

0:44:05.000 --> 0:44:07.200
<v Speaker 2>and run the ball, those receivers have to block, like

0:44:07.280 --> 0:44:09.399
<v Speaker 2>if you're taking off tight ends and fullbacks like that's

0:44:09.400 --> 0:44:10.960
<v Speaker 2>what they have to do. It's just part of the

0:44:10.960 --> 0:44:13.719
<v Speaker 2>position now. And so watch that's where some of the

0:44:13.719 --> 0:44:16.239
<v Speaker 2>size stuff comes in and more of just toughness. And

0:44:16.239 --> 0:44:18.880
<v Speaker 2>that's what's so funny is that I'll start with him

0:44:18.920 --> 0:44:21.799
<v Speaker 2>is Chris olave Is. He's not usually the guys I like,

0:44:21.880 --> 0:44:24.040
<v Speaker 2>I like. I love his route running. He is advanced,

0:44:24.040 --> 0:44:25.839
<v Speaker 2>as one of the most advanced route runners I've ever

0:44:25.840 --> 0:44:29.160
<v Speaker 2>seen come out of the college level. On top of that,

0:44:29.200 --> 0:44:32.080
<v Speaker 2>he has speed, legit speed that he uses. It's not

0:44:32.200 --> 0:44:34.600
<v Speaker 2>just a theory thing where it's like, oh, you ran

0:44:34.640 --> 0:44:35.800
<v Speaker 2>a four to three eight, I thought you're gonna be

0:44:35.840 --> 0:44:37.960
<v Speaker 2>a four or five guy. It's actually he uses that

0:44:38.000 --> 0:44:41.080
<v Speaker 2>speed to his advantage. I like his ball scales, his

0:44:41.080 --> 0:44:43.359
<v Speaker 2>his My negatives with him is he is smaller as

0:44:43.400 --> 0:44:47.479
<v Speaker 2>far as play strength. He's not a good blocker. He

0:44:47.520 --> 0:44:50.279
<v Speaker 2>can get pushed around more physical guys, but how he

0:44:50.280 --> 0:44:53.160
<v Speaker 2>can overcome it because he's so skilled. So that's why

0:44:53.239 --> 0:44:55.360
<v Speaker 2>I'm okay with him as opposed to usual with the

0:44:55.400 --> 0:44:58.440
<v Speaker 2>smaller guys or skinnier guys, I should say, because it's

0:44:58.440 --> 0:45:01.800
<v Speaker 2>not smallly six foot U. There's just skinny. He's just skinny,

0:45:02.320 --> 0:45:04.839
<v Speaker 2>and that always matters with durability stuff. But then Drake

0:45:04.880 --> 0:45:08.440
<v Speaker 2>london Is, I went in that's what I thought. I

0:45:08.480 --> 0:45:10.240
<v Speaker 2>thought it was just gonna be some big dude, almost

0:45:10.239 --> 0:45:12.200
<v Speaker 2>like one of the Clemson guys that's come through the years.

0:45:12.200 --> 0:45:15.840
<v Speaker 2>Mike Williams the t Higgins of the world. He's just big, big,

0:45:16.160 --> 0:45:20.080
<v Speaker 2>almost stiff, but just like snatch everything. And why I

0:45:20.120 --> 0:45:22.800
<v Speaker 2>loved London so much was he was sinking on routes.

0:45:22.960 --> 0:45:25.480
<v Speaker 2>He was you could see the athleticism. Even if his

0:45:25.560 --> 0:45:28.480
<v Speaker 2>long speed's not there, his one through ten speed was

0:45:28.520 --> 0:45:32.000
<v Speaker 2>actually pretty good. And also being able to like like

0:45:32.239 --> 0:45:34.520
<v Speaker 2>actually like run a full rout tree even if that

0:45:34.640 --> 0:45:36.400
<v Speaker 2>was an a it's a true air raid offense that

0:45:36.440 --> 0:45:38.920
<v Speaker 2>they ran. And oh my god, so many screens. I

0:45:38.920 --> 0:45:39.719
<v Speaker 2>couldn't believe how many.

0:45:40.760 --> 0:45:42.960
<v Speaker 3>Oh my god, Hey, you have Drake London and you're

0:45:43.000 --> 0:45:45.360
<v Speaker 3>throwing him short balls all the time.

0:45:45.280 --> 0:45:47.919
<v Speaker 2>All over and over. And also the quarterback was late

0:45:47.960 --> 0:45:50.200
<v Speaker 2>all the time, and that's where some of the separation

0:45:50.520 --> 0:45:52.600
<v Speaker 2>like arguments came from. Well we can't separate. It's like, no,

0:45:52.640 --> 0:45:55.400
<v Speaker 2>he separated. The quarterback was three seconds late, so he

0:45:55.440 --> 0:45:56.719
<v Speaker 2>had to play in his foot and go up and

0:45:56.719 --> 0:45:59.719
<v Speaker 2>get it. Against Oregon State, I watched him and he

0:45:59.760 --> 0:46:03.000
<v Speaker 2>had he legitimately drew five penalties in that game or more.

0:46:03.360 --> 0:46:05.040
<v Speaker 2>That's just off the top of my head I can remember.

0:46:05.440 --> 0:46:08.640
<v Speaker 2>So it's like he's dominating like he is dominating as

0:46:08.719 --> 0:46:10.480
<v Speaker 2>much as you can see a receiver dominate at the

0:46:10.480 --> 0:46:13.400
<v Speaker 2>college level. And the versatility that he brings. He can

0:46:13.440 --> 0:46:15.759
<v Speaker 2>work from the slot, he can block like they have

0:46:15.840 --> 0:46:18.680
<v Speaker 2>him running like tight end blocking stuff. So it's like,

0:46:18.719 --> 0:46:20.360
<v Speaker 2>this guy, no matter what I think, it could just

0:46:20.400 --> 0:46:23.920
<v Speaker 2>be useful, like and if the upside, he still has upside.

0:46:23.920 --> 0:46:27.080
<v Speaker 2>Though he's super young, he's just become like finally becoming

0:46:27.080 --> 0:46:28.759
<v Speaker 2>a full time football player for the first time in

0:46:28.760 --> 0:46:31.800
<v Speaker 2>his life. I just like, I just like the package

0:46:31.920 --> 0:46:36.279
<v Speaker 2>of him, size, ball skills, route running, just all the

0:46:36.440 --> 0:46:39.160
<v Speaker 2>like polishes already shown. And he's so young at such

0:46:39.160 --> 0:46:41.400
<v Speaker 2>a young age. So that's why I really really like him.

0:46:41.440 --> 0:46:43.399
<v Speaker 2>There's and there's a couple other guys, like bigger guys

0:46:43.440 --> 0:46:47.000
<v Speaker 2>that I always gravitude towards, Like I'm high on Justin

0:46:47.080 --> 0:46:51.120
<v Speaker 2>Ross from Clenson. Sure, really it's And what's funny is

0:46:51.160 --> 0:46:53.160
<v Speaker 2>I remember as a freshman, but really my grade off

0:46:53.200 --> 0:46:55.520
<v Speaker 2>of him, I have early second grade on him, and

0:46:55.640 --> 0:46:57.279
<v Speaker 2>medicals are going to be a train wreck for him.

0:46:57.719 --> 0:46:59.759
<v Speaker 2>But is this past year I was watching him and

0:46:59.760 --> 0:47:01.400
<v Speaker 2>I was like, this guy's a stud. It's just that

0:47:01.440 --> 0:47:05.319
<v Speaker 2>the quarterback was hitting the stands on the throws. So

0:47:05.400 --> 0:47:07.560
<v Speaker 2>this poor guy's bringing guys off on routes and then

0:47:07.640 --> 0:47:09.480
<v Speaker 2>seeing the ball like go over his head. He looks like,

0:47:09.520 --> 0:47:11.000
<v Speaker 2>you know, like a pitcher that gives up a home

0:47:11.080 --> 0:47:13.000
<v Speaker 2>run and the ball and they just look at the

0:47:13.000 --> 0:47:15.319
<v Speaker 2>ball go over. That's that was justin ross running routes

0:47:15.960 --> 0:47:17.440
<v Speaker 2>and then but what I liked about him was that

0:47:17.480 --> 0:47:20.480
<v Speaker 2>he would he would still compete as a blocker. He

0:47:20.560 --> 0:47:23.560
<v Speaker 2>was still into the game even though the targets weren't coming,

0:47:23.640 --> 0:47:26.399
<v Speaker 2>the stats weren't coming, So that really maybe I was like, okay,

0:47:26.440 --> 0:47:28.920
<v Speaker 2>you're you get it, like you want to compete, and

0:47:29.080 --> 0:47:32.880
<v Speaker 2>receivers can be come and go with their competition levels.

0:47:32.920 --> 0:47:35.120
<v Speaker 2>So that's those are always positives that you want to see,

0:47:35.840 --> 0:47:37.439
<v Speaker 2>you know, and then you want to just talk about

0:47:37.440 --> 0:47:39.759
<v Speaker 2>the rest of the first round guys, I have go

0:47:39.880 --> 0:47:43.840
<v Speaker 2>for it. Yeah, but my number three is Jameson Williams,

0:47:44.000 --> 0:47:47.359
<v Speaker 2>and I think everybody's watched college football or now knows

0:47:47.360 --> 0:47:49.800
<v Speaker 2>about the draft knows what his game is. Speed, speed, speed.

0:47:50.239 --> 0:47:52.000
<v Speaker 2>But what I liked about him is he was more

0:47:52.040 --> 0:47:54.080
<v Speaker 2>of a real receiver than I thought he would be.

0:47:54.120 --> 0:47:56.239
<v Speaker 2>He actually knows how to run routes and actually knows

0:47:56.239 --> 0:47:58.920
<v Speaker 2>how to tempo his stuff a bit of a body catcher,

0:47:58.960 --> 0:48:00.719
<v Speaker 2>which I didn't like, but I I still like him

0:48:00.760 --> 0:48:03.200
<v Speaker 2>as like he's useful, like no matter which team he

0:48:03.239 --> 0:48:05.720
<v Speaker 2>goes to, they're gonna you always have a use for speed.

0:48:06.760 --> 0:48:09.440
<v Speaker 2>And then next I really like Johan Dotson. I'm from

0:48:09.480 --> 0:48:12.839
<v Speaker 2>Penn State. I know that that preaching to acquire probably here,

0:48:12.880 --> 0:48:15.880
<v Speaker 2>but I think he's just a ballplayer. I think he

0:48:15.920 --> 0:48:18.439
<v Speaker 2>played with bad quarterback play, or if he quarterback play

0:48:18.520 --> 0:48:20.160
<v Speaker 2>and he is, I think he's just a hell of

0:48:20.160 --> 0:48:22.879
<v Speaker 2>a football player, plays big. I compared him to Tyler

0:48:22.960 --> 0:48:26.359
<v Speaker 2>Lockett and then Traylon Burks from Arkansas, which is one

0:48:26.360 --> 0:48:29.200
<v Speaker 2>of the weirdest studies I've ever had for the receiver position,

0:48:29.320 --> 0:48:31.120
<v Speaker 2>just how they use him. I think he's a big

0:48:31.160 --> 0:48:33.640
<v Speaker 2>boomer bust candidate. But if he gets to the right

0:48:33.719 --> 0:48:36.400
<v Speaker 2>system that guides him along, I think he still has

0:48:36.440 --> 0:48:38.880
<v Speaker 2>to learn how to play football. I don't think his

0:48:38.360 --> 0:48:41.600
<v Speaker 2>understanding of the playbooks all the way there. That's why

0:48:41.600 --> 0:48:43.839
<v Speaker 2>they motioned them so many times. They have to tag

0:48:43.920 --> 0:48:45.680
<v Speaker 2>them and tell him, hey, Traylon moved to the right,

0:48:46.000 --> 0:48:48.640
<v Speaker 2>run this route. So I do think there's part of that.

0:48:48.680 --> 0:48:50.799
<v Speaker 2>So his learning curves can be a little steeper, but

0:48:50.840 --> 0:48:54.319
<v Speaker 2>if he hits, he'll he'll hit pretty well because he's

0:48:54.360 --> 0:48:56.480
<v Speaker 2>just so has so many cool traits. And the last

0:48:56.520 --> 0:48:59.600
<v Speaker 2>one's Garrett Wilson from Ohio State, which I'm a little

0:48:59.600 --> 0:49:01.759
<v Speaker 2>I have some concerns with his route running, how he

0:49:01.760 --> 0:49:04.200
<v Speaker 2>plays against press, but when you just get the ball

0:49:04.239 --> 0:49:05.880
<v Speaker 2>in his hands and it's just like, go do stuff

0:49:06.080 --> 0:49:08.680
<v Speaker 2>because he's so dynamic. I couldpare it him to Brandon

0:49:08.719 --> 0:49:10.920
<v Speaker 2>Ayuk from who's with the forty nine ers now, where

0:49:10.920 --> 0:49:13.320
<v Speaker 2>it's it's a little bit more boom busty, but it's like,

0:49:13.400 --> 0:49:14.560
<v Speaker 2>just get the ball in his hands and let him

0:49:14.560 --> 0:49:15.120
<v Speaker 2>go make plays.

0:49:15.800 --> 0:49:20.000
<v Speaker 3>Who is the highest star potential guy on your board,

0:49:20.080 --> 0:49:22.600
<v Speaker 3>either any position, any side of the ball, whatever you mentioned.

0:49:22.640 --> 0:49:25.560
<v Speaker 3>Malik Willis has the highest star potential of any of

0:49:25.560 --> 0:49:28.000
<v Speaker 3>the quarterbacks. But just in terms of like, look, you're

0:49:28.000 --> 0:49:30.040
<v Speaker 3>in Vegas. If you're betting ten thousand of your own

0:49:30.040 --> 0:49:32.880
<v Speaker 3>American dollars that this person will be a pro bowler,

0:49:33.000 --> 0:49:33.840
<v Speaker 3>who is that person?

0:49:34.360 --> 0:49:38.640
<v Speaker 2>Drake London? I do I think that if he I'm

0:49:38.640 --> 0:49:40.160
<v Speaker 2>not as concerned about as long speed. I know he

0:49:40.160 --> 0:49:42.239
<v Speaker 2>hasn't run and he keeps putting off his pro day.

0:49:42.760 --> 0:49:44.879
<v Speaker 2>But I'm not as concerned as other people are because

0:49:44.880 --> 0:49:47.920
<v Speaker 2>he just win. Like it's just a useful NFL player,

0:49:48.040 --> 0:49:51.520
<v Speaker 2>NFL receiver, and I think that if he does take

0:49:51.520 --> 0:49:53.759
<v Speaker 2>a next step that it's like, oh, who's going to

0:49:53.800 --> 0:49:56.799
<v Speaker 2>guard him? Like it's I've seen, I've seen now for

0:49:56.960 --> 0:49:59.760
<v Speaker 2>seven years. No one could guard Mike Evans once unless

0:49:59.760 --> 0:50:02.560
<v Speaker 2>you just double team on basically every play. I don't.

0:50:02.680 --> 0:50:05.399
<v Speaker 2>I think he's not as big or as truly as

0:50:05.400 --> 0:50:07.720
<v Speaker 2>explosive as Mike Evans is, but I think he's more skilled.

0:50:08.200 --> 0:50:10.160
<v Speaker 2>So it's kind of like a fun match. I know

0:50:10.200 --> 0:50:12.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm super high on them. I feel right crazy. I

0:50:12.680 --> 0:50:14.480
<v Speaker 2>go crazy on him, but then I just watch. Every

0:50:14.520 --> 0:50:17.239
<v Speaker 2>time I rewatch them, I'm like, yeah, I double down

0:50:17.280 --> 0:50:19.360
<v Speaker 2>on that. But I do think he has some of

0:50:19.360 --> 0:50:21.719
<v Speaker 2>the most star potential, especially of this crops. It's a

0:50:21.719 --> 0:50:22.880
<v Speaker 2>good cropper receivers, it really is.

0:50:23.040 --> 0:50:24.600
<v Speaker 3>It must be by the way, it must be maddening,

0:50:24.680 --> 0:50:27.120
<v Speaker 3>and you know, it's it's easy to dig on where

0:50:27.239 --> 0:50:30.439
<v Speaker 3>USC has been these past couple of years. To look

0:50:30.480 --> 0:50:33.480
<v Speaker 3>at players. You're like, he's definitely getting the ball, like

0:50:33.520 --> 0:50:36.080
<v Speaker 3>he's to everybody knows he's getting the ball or everybody

0:50:36.120 --> 0:50:38.359
<v Speaker 3>knows this running back is getting the ball, everybody knows

0:50:38.360 --> 0:50:40.840
<v Speaker 3>where this this team has to go because there's so

0:50:41.000 --> 0:50:44.560
<v Speaker 3>little talent or organization, and yet the guy still succeeds.

0:50:44.719 --> 0:50:46.239
<v Speaker 3>And there are examples of that up and down. The

0:50:46.360 --> 0:50:48.480
<v Speaker 3>NFL guys who were taking the lower rounds were just

0:50:48.480 --> 0:50:51.680
<v Speaker 3>like they somehow always got open. They somehow and so

0:50:52.160 --> 0:50:55.560
<v Speaker 3>it's got to be infuriating to you to to have

0:50:55.640 --> 0:50:59.200
<v Speaker 3>to watch these bad football teams with these like lone

0:50:59.280 --> 0:51:02.960
<v Speaker 3>shining stuff who are not maximizing their winning potential.

0:51:03.280 --> 0:51:07.640
<v Speaker 2>It's rough. It's rough when you I've realized every time

0:51:07.680 --> 0:51:09.480
<v Speaker 2>I do this, I'm like, oh, I've been spoiled with

0:51:09.600 --> 0:51:12.719
<v Speaker 2>NFL play. You're just like even the quote unquote bad

0:51:12.840 --> 0:51:15.120
<v Speaker 2>NFL teams, it's like you still watch them. You're like

0:51:15.120 --> 0:51:18.560
<v Speaker 2>they're still doing cool stuff or this player is fricking awesome. Like,

0:51:18.920 --> 0:51:22.400
<v Speaker 2>but yeah, you watch these college games and it's I've

0:51:22.480 --> 0:51:25.360
<v Speaker 2>gotten spoiled. Not we just play, but just quarterback play.

0:51:25.719 --> 0:51:28.840
<v Speaker 2>Because USC was one of them. I'm watching these guys

0:51:28.880 --> 0:51:30.640
<v Speaker 2>take forever to get rid of the ball, and I'm like,

0:51:30.640 --> 0:51:33.560
<v Speaker 2>the throws there, just throw it, just please, for the

0:51:33.600 --> 0:51:36.680
<v Speaker 2>love of God, just hit them and or watching Clemson

0:51:36.719 --> 0:51:38.319
<v Speaker 2>and seeing like I was like, man, this guy is

0:51:38.320 --> 0:51:41.719
<v Speaker 2>taking the long wind up and the balls over. That's yeah,

0:51:41.840 --> 0:51:44.880
<v Speaker 2>that's h yeah. After receiver positions where that crops up

0:51:44.920 --> 0:51:46.799
<v Speaker 2>the most, because you'll go fifty snaps where they don't

0:51:46.800 --> 0:51:49.279
<v Speaker 2>even get a target, and so you get a little

0:51:49.280 --> 0:51:51.040
<v Speaker 2>bit bit bored watching them.

0:51:51.280 --> 0:51:53.160
<v Speaker 3>On the flip side, though, I mean, and we'll let

0:51:53.200 --> 0:51:54.520
<v Speaker 3>you out of here in a couple of minutes, but

0:51:54.640 --> 0:51:56.120
<v Speaker 3>you've been terrific, so I'm just going to keep you

0:51:56.160 --> 0:51:58.720
<v Speaker 3>as long as we possibly can. On the flip side,

0:51:58.840 --> 0:52:01.240
<v Speaker 3>you'll watch teams who are so deep and so talented

0:52:01.239 --> 0:52:03.520
<v Speaker 3>and so much more talented than the competition. And you

0:52:03.520 --> 0:52:05.440
<v Speaker 3>mentioned this a little bit with Tua, like he has

0:52:05.480 --> 0:52:08.360
<v Speaker 3>to run the RPO stuff. But on a certain level,

0:52:08.520 --> 0:52:11.560
<v Speaker 3>whether it's Alabama or Ohio State or what Clemson was

0:52:11.920 --> 0:52:14.040
<v Speaker 3>or some of the better teams in the country, are

0:52:14.080 --> 0:52:16.799
<v Speaker 3>you like, yeah, but it's a little bit easier for

0:52:16.840 --> 0:52:20.760
<v Speaker 3>them because this guy's the number three receiver and numbers

0:52:20.760 --> 0:52:23.520
<v Speaker 3>one and two are getting so much attention. So he's drawing,

0:52:23.680 --> 0:52:26.000
<v Speaker 3>you know, a worse corner or a worse nickel or whatever,

0:52:26.440 --> 0:52:29.759
<v Speaker 3>or this offensive lineman is drawing you know or is

0:52:30.800 --> 0:52:33.960
<v Speaker 3>surrounded by other crazy talented guys. So this defensive lineman

0:52:34.080 --> 0:52:36.359
<v Speaker 3>is playing with another guy who's getting double teams all

0:52:36.400 --> 0:52:39.919
<v Speaker 3>the time. Like, how is it difficult to sift through

0:52:41.000 --> 0:52:42.200
<v Speaker 3>a more advantaged player.

0:52:42.280 --> 0:52:45.800
<v Speaker 2>I guess yeah, yeah, yes, and no, it's especially for quarterbacks.

0:52:45.800 --> 0:52:48.839
<v Speaker 2>It's the offensive line. Yeah, and what they have to

0:52:48.920 --> 0:52:51.920
<v Speaker 2>deal with, Like that was that speaks to Ritter a

0:52:51.960 --> 0:52:53.960
<v Speaker 2>little bit more? Was no one really brought up the

0:52:54.000 --> 0:52:57.880
<v Speaker 2>Cincinnati offensive line. They were not good, right, they were

0:52:57.920 --> 0:53:00.000
<v Speaker 2>like below I would say average. I'll put them at average,

0:53:00.200 --> 0:53:04.480
<v Speaker 2>but they they watching them and that's like it speaks

0:53:04.520 --> 0:53:07.600
<v Speaker 2>more to Ritter. But then you watch another guy I'm

0:53:07.600 --> 0:53:09.640
<v Speaker 2>trying to think of, like one of the past, maybe

0:53:09.680 --> 0:53:11.279
<v Speaker 2>Mac Jones last year. I was just bring him up,

0:53:11.280 --> 0:53:12.719
<v Speaker 2>but like just sitting there and they just get to

0:53:12.760 --> 0:53:15.959
<v Speaker 2>hang out. And just or Russell Wilson when I played

0:53:15.960 --> 0:53:17.919
<v Speaker 2>with him at Wisconsin where it's just he just hung

0:53:17.920 --> 0:53:19.560
<v Speaker 2>out in the pocket. It was just like one, you know,

0:53:19.640 --> 0:53:22.759
<v Speaker 2>one Mississippy two Mississippi kind of like all right, I'm

0:53:22.760 --> 0:53:25.400
<v Speaker 2>gonna go scramble, just go make something happen. So you

0:53:25.480 --> 0:53:28.560
<v Speaker 2>always have to take that into account. You also get

0:53:28.640 --> 0:53:32.840
<v Speaker 2>kind of a good litmus test kind of going like seeing,

0:53:33.160 --> 0:53:35.800
<v Speaker 2>especially like running back, this will happen a lot. Okay,

0:53:35.960 --> 0:53:37.920
<v Speaker 2>this running back goes, he gets three carries. Okay, it

0:53:37.920 --> 0:53:40.640
<v Speaker 2>looks okay. How does his backup look getting behind the

0:53:40.680 --> 0:53:45.359
<v Speaker 2>same offensive line, same play, same situation. That was That's

0:53:45.400 --> 0:53:47.680
<v Speaker 2>the position I think more than others, you can really

0:53:48.080 --> 0:53:50.400
<v Speaker 2>get a tell for a situation and based on how

0:53:50.440 --> 0:53:52.840
<v Speaker 2>their backup does. Like That's one of the reasons I

0:53:52.880 --> 0:53:54.759
<v Speaker 2>was kind of lower on Isaiah Spiller a textas a

0:53:54.840 --> 0:53:57.160
<v Speaker 2>and m I'd watch his backup go in and get

0:53:57.560 --> 0:53:59.560
<v Speaker 2>break off and explosive play, and then he goes and

0:53:59.600 --> 0:54:01.959
<v Speaker 2>he gets fars and I was like, man, this one

0:54:01.960 --> 0:54:04.279
<v Speaker 2>was actually blocked better, Like you got to you got to,

0:54:04.280 --> 0:54:06.319
<v Speaker 2>you know, make something happen with it. So I would

0:54:06.320 --> 0:54:08.520
<v Speaker 2>say that position, more than others, you can really see stuff.

0:54:08.560 --> 0:54:10.840
<v Speaker 2>I would say, quarterback, Yeah, you have to take that

0:54:10.840 --> 0:54:13.400
<v Speaker 2>into account. This is like I was watch Ritter and

0:54:13.480 --> 0:54:15.920
<v Speaker 2>this is again I'm mister optimist on him, but you

0:54:15.960 --> 0:54:19.239
<v Speaker 2>watch him unless he's thrown to Alec Pierce, who I

0:54:19.239 --> 0:54:23.280
<v Speaker 2>also like the receiver or the tight end Wiley. Everybody

0:54:23.280 --> 0:54:25.719
<v Speaker 2>else was dropping the ball every like every other time.

0:54:25.760 --> 0:54:27.520
<v Speaker 2>It would him right the chest and drop it. So

0:54:27.560 --> 0:54:28.920
<v Speaker 2>you take that into the count You're like, well, I'm

0:54:28.920 --> 0:54:31.600
<v Speaker 2>going to watch the process at this guy. Yeah, don't

0:54:31.640 --> 0:54:33.600
<v Speaker 2>look at the result, look at the process leading up

0:54:33.640 --> 0:54:36.640
<v Speaker 2>to that. Especially all these guys, it's process, process, process,

0:54:36.680 --> 0:54:39.040
<v Speaker 2>and then it leads to good results. If you're on

0:54:39.080 --> 0:54:41.440
<v Speaker 2>a good team, the good results happen all the time.

0:54:41.719 --> 0:54:43.359
<v Speaker 2>If you're on a bad team, it's like, wow, that

0:54:43.360 --> 0:54:46.640
<v Speaker 2>process was good. Another drop, All that process was good.

0:54:46.719 --> 0:54:49.399
<v Speaker 2>Left guard got beat. You know, you know that those

0:54:49.440 --> 0:54:51.400
<v Speaker 2>things start adding up. I think that's a big difference.

0:54:51.480 --> 0:54:54.200
<v Speaker 2>Is the good teams get the results more, which makes

0:54:54.239 --> 0:54:55.160
<v Speaker 2>sense with all the wins.

0:54:55.719 --> 0:54:58.480
<v Speaker 1>Yes, Nate, I know we've asked you about, you know,

0:54:58.560 --> 0:55:02.160
<v Speaker 1>some very specific draft things here, but who are just

0:55:02.440 --> 0:55:05.520
<v Speaker 1>some other names guys that you came across, Maybe not

0:55:05.600 --> 0:55:09.160
<v Speaker 1>the accidental discovery is Dan description earlier, but just guys

0:55:09.160 --> 0:55:11.680
<v Speaker 1>that you like, Guys that you enjoyed watching on tape,

0:55:11.680 --> 0:55:13.600
<v Speaker 1>who you were rooting for on draft day.

0:55:14.040 --> 0:55:17.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Khalil Shakir from Boise State is probably one of

0:55:17.440 --> 0:55:20.520
<v Speaker 2>my favorite watches of any position. I have a high

0:55:20.560 --> 0:55:24.360
<v Speaker 2>second round grade on him. I'm shocked, like I'm waiting

0:55:24.400 --> 0:55:26.640
<v Speaker 2>for people to catch people like him, but I thought

0:55:26.680 --> 0:55:29.160
<v Speaker 2>kind of maybe he ran pretty well at the combine.

0:55:29.160 --> 0:55:30.880
<v Speaker 2>I thought maybe he'd get another little bump. But I

0:55:31.239 --> 0:55:33.080
<v Speaker 2>love him. I think he's a returner. I think he's

0:55:33.080 --> 0:55:35.040
<v Speaker 2>gonna be a very useful and early in his career.

0:55:35.160 --> 0:55:38.360
<v Speaker 2>Number two can play slot and play outside. Good route runner,

0:55:38.360 --> 0:55:41.040
<v Speaker 2>he's just got short arms, but good returner, like just

0:55:41.080 --> 0:55:46.160
<v Speaker 2>a ballplayer. I really like him. Other guys like Sky Moore.

0:55:46.840 --> 0:55:49.800
<v Speaker 2>I'm not the first person to say that they like him.

0:55:49.880 --> 0:55:52.440
<v Speaker 2>I've already brought up I've already brought up Justin Ross,

0:55:52.440 --> 0:55:56.320
<v Speaker 2>who I'm super high on that. You know, the injury

0:55:56.360 --> 0:55:58.560
<v Speaker 2>concerns is what's gonna what's gonna make him drop a

0:55:58.600 --> 0:56:00.600
<v Speaker 2>little bit? That's our receiver. I would sy tight end

0:56:00.960 --> 0:56:04.040
<v Speaker 2>Greg Dolcic from u c l A. Yeah, I really.

0:56:04.040 --> 0:56:06.080
<v Speaker 2>He's been a late rise. He was a declare. That's

0:56:06.120 --> 0:56:08.799
<v Speaker 2>where we're talking about, Oh wow, this guy's eligible, had

0:56:08.800 --> 0:56:10.320
<v Speaker 2>no idea and they need declare And I was like,

0:56:10.360 --> 0:56:11.960
<v Speaker 2>oh God, I gotta watch him real quick. And I

0:56:12.000 --> 0:56:15.279
<v Speaker 2>was like, oh man, he's pretty damn good. Runs like

0:56:15.320 --> 0:56:17.719
<v Speaker 2>a deer like he is. I compared him actually to

0:56:17.840 --> 0:56:20.600
<v Speaker 2>Jared Cook, which is like so funny because he's really

0:56:20.960 --> 0:56:23.760
<v Speaker 2>high cut, really long legged, so it kind of actually

0:56:23.800 --> 0:56:26.000
<v Speaker 2>hurts him blocking because he can't get low and this

0:56:26.040 --> 0:56:28.160
<v Speaker 2>is a detailed like this is just ran this as

0:56:28.160 --> 0:56:30.399
<v Speaker 2>I is. But then but he can run and take

0:56:30.600 --> 0:56:32.760
<v Speaker 2>like a true vertical threat or at the tight end position.

0:56:32.840 --> 0:56:36.880
<v Speaker 2>I really like him. Kate Otten from Washington, good blocking

0:56:36.880 --> 0:56:39.239
<v Speaker 2>tight end, kind of does everything well. Really like him.

0:56:39.960 --> 0:56:42.799
<v Speaker 2>Another Derek D's from San Jose State. He's like a

0:56:42.880 --> 0:56:44.879
<v Speaker 2>Day three guy, but I really like him as well.

0:56:44.960 --> 0:56:46.680
<v Speaker 2>He didn't run or anything, so I'm a little I

0:56:46.719 --> 0:56:48.719
<v Speaker 2>always hate that. Like I went to the Shrine game,

0:56:48.760 --> 0:56:49.880
<v Speaker 2>I was waiting for him. I was like, this is

0:56:49.960 --> 0:56:51.759
<v Speaker 2>kind of my baby, like my little dark horse. And

0:56:51.800 --> 0:56:54.319
<v Speaker 2>then he didn't He got he got he like got

0:56:54.320 --> 0:56:57.920
<v Speaker 2>an ankle, rolled, rolled an ankle, sprained ankle, like individual

0:56:58.000 --> 0:57:00.600
<v Speaker 2>first first practice and he didn't practice. I like dropped

0:57:00.640 --> 0:57:02.440
<v Speaker 2>him around because I was so frustrated with them. But

0:57:04.280 --> 0:57:07.239
<v Speaker 2>I would give him a chance. I would say, even

0:57:07.360 --> 0:57:10.400
<v Speaker 2>if we're going running backs. I really like Rashad White

0:57:10.440 --> 0:57:13.000
<v Speaker 2>of Arizona's statement, that's kind of like my little he

0:57:13.040 --> 0:57:16.920
<v Speaker 2>was their offense dude. He is I like I was

0:57:17.120 --> 0:57:20.400
<v Speaker 2>because I saw Richard senior with him and I was like, Okay,

0:57:20.440 --> 0:57:22.400
<v Speaker 2>that's running back. You don't really want to see that.

0:57:22.680 --> 0:57:24.800
<v Speaker 2>And then you watch him and he is talented. He

0:57:24.920 --> 0:57:28.440
<v Speaker 2>is such a fun player. Tyler al Jeer, I like him.

0:57:28.480 --> 0:57:31.800
<v Speaker 2>For BYU compared him with James Connor type. I like

0:57:31.920 --> 0:57:36.240
<v Speaker 2>Jerome Ford from Cincinnati. Those guys, I really like all

0:57:36.280 --> 0:57:38.600
<v Speaker 2>of them. I got one other guy and it's like

0:57:38.840 --> 0:57:40.000
<v Speaker 2>it's on the tip of my tongue and now I

0:57:40.040 --> 0:57:42.640
<v Speaker 2>can't think of his name. But anyways, those guys are

0:57:42.680 --> 0:57:44.800
<v Speaker 2>oh ty Chandler from North Carolina. I like him as

0:57:44.800 --> 0:57:47.240
<v Speaker 2>a Day three guy, a little long legged, but I

0:57:47.760 --> 0:57:49.840
<v Speaker 2>think he's usfual. I think someone's going to gonna like

0:57:49.920 --> 0:57:51.800
<v Speaker 2>him a little bit. But yeah, I really like this

0:57:51.840 --> 0:57:53.720
<v Speaker 2>running back class. There's a lot of like round three,

0:57:53.840 --> 0:57:56.200
<v Speaker 2>round four types that a couple of them are going

0:57:56.240 --> 0:57:57.000
<v Speaker 2>to hit for somebody.

0:57:57.600 --> 0:58:01.200
<v Speaker 3>Final question. You're in Vegas. You've talked about preferring size

0:58:01.200 --> 0:58:05.600
<v Speaker 3>from your NFL draft prospects. My co host Tye does

0:58:05.800 --> 0:58:08.160
<v Speaker 3>is a five tool player. But if there's something that

0:58:08.240 --> 0:58:11.640
<v Speaker 3>Tie does not bring to the table, it is elite size.

0:58:11.640 --> 0:58:14.280
<v Speaker 3>About five to nine? What buck sixty, buck fifty five?

0:58:14.520 --> 0:58:15.400
<v Speaker 3>Where are you at right now.

0:58:15.480 --> 0:58:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm not starting in the league.

0:58:17.600 --> 0:58:20.439
<v Speaker 3>You're not starting in the league. But my question to you,

0:58:20.720 --> 0:58:23.040
<v Speaker 3>as somebody who prefers and has been around size, you're

0:58:23.080 --> 0:58:26.320
<v Speaker 3>in Vegas. If TIE is in Vegas and you can't

0:58:26.360 --> 0:58:29.800
<v Speaker 3>answer buffet or anything like that. We're building quality mass

0:58:30.120 --> 0:58:33.760
<v Speaker 3>on Tie via a series of meals. What is your

0:58:33.800 --> 0:58:39.360
<v Speaker 3>itinerary for TIE building quality mass in restaurants in Las Vegas.

0:58:39.760 --> 0:58:43.160
<v Speaker 2>I would start with lunch at Good Pie, which is

0:58:43.200 --> 0:58:46.479
<v Speaker 2>a great call. Yeah, pizza joint in downtown Vegas, which

0:58:46.520 --> 0:58:50.080
<v Speaker 2>is it's area called It's on Main Streets the Arts District,

0:58:50.120 --> 0:58:52.160
<v Speaker 2>which is which is basically they threw a bunch of

0:58:52.240 --> 0:58:54.680
<v Speaker 2>hipsters at it and it became a spot and it's great.

0:58:54.680 --> 0:58:57.680
<v Speaker 2>It's great though, by the Yeah Good Pie. I would

0:58:57.680 --> 0:59:01.520
<v Speaker 2>start with lunch there, dinner it would be all, my god, dinner.

0:59:01.560 --> 0:59:04.120
<v Speaker 2>You go a million places. I like Al Mafi at

0:59:04.200 --> 0:59:07.480
<v Speaker 2>freaking at Caesar's, trying to run my brain here. That's

0:59:07.480 --> 0:59:10.560
<v Speaker 2>my my terranean style. There's a place out here in

0:59:10.600 --> 0:59:13.880
<v Speaker 2>the suburbs in Summerlin called Harlow's, which is a steakhouse

0:59:13.880 --> 0:59:17.280
<v Speaker 2>at I adore I look, it's by Rob mary Neelli,

0:59:18.000 --> 0:59:22.400
<v Speaker 2>the former coaches his daughter. She's she's a chef, she's awesome,

0:59:22.800 --> 0:59:25.000
<v Speaker 2>But Harlow's out here. I would also go to Italy,

0:59:25.040 --> 0:59:27.520
<v Speaker 2>which is a multiple places. There's one work, there's other,

0:59:27.760 --> 0:59:30.160
<v Speaker 2>but there's a sandwich there. I would also get, so

0:59:30.200 --> 0:59:32.479
<v Speaker 2>if you're going in between lunch and dinner, I would

0:59:32.480 --> 0:59:35.439
<v Speaker 2>get a sandwich there. There's a it's like a it's

0:59:35.440 --> 0:59:37.440
<v Speaker 2>super simple. It's just a really good bread. They put

0:59:37.480 --> 0:59:39.240
<v Speaker 2>all of oil, salt, pepper, and just like a little

0:59:39.240 --> 0:59:40.440
<v Speaker 2>wolf some meat on there.

0:59:40.880 --> 0:59:41.480
<v Speaker 3>I think I had.

0:59:41.760 --> 0:59:44.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's so freaking good. And I'm trying to think

0:59:44.920 --> 0:59:47.080
<v Speaker 2>of other dinner places. I kind of like I'm kind

0:59:47.080 --> 0:59:49.000
<v Speaker 2>of a grab back because there's like seven places I

0:59:49.040 --> 0:59:51.480
<v Speaker 2>like buy them all the same rating. So really dinner

0:59:51.520 --> 0:59:53.320
<v Speaker 2>you can kind of what you choose where you want

0:59:53.320 --> 0:59:53.920
<v Speaker 2>to bulk up there.

0:59:53.960 --> 0:59:55.760
<v Speaker 3>Have you done? Have you done Carbone?

0:59:56.120 --> 1:00:00.640
<v Speaker 2>Oh? Yes, I did it last week actually with my parents. Yeah,

1:00:00.680 --> 1:00:02.960
<v Speaker 2>that's a good spot. That's actually really good.

1:00:03.360 --> 1:00:06.960
<v Speaker 3>Well, it's it's a it's like elevated red sauce Italian

1:00:07.000 --> 1:00:09.439
<v Speaker 3>tie and you're gonna do real well, Like you can

1:00:09.480 --> 1:00:14.040
<v Speaker 3>stuff yourself with the bread that they they'll bring you

1:00:14.080 --> 1:00:16.240
<v Speaker 3>like a basket. The size of your torso of bread

1:00:16.280 --> 1:00:18.280
<v Speaker 3>with soapro soada and parmesan cheese.

1:00:18.320 --> 1:00:20.320
<v Speaker 1>And but what about the vodka sauce, Dan, You know

1:00:20.320 --> 1:00:24.120
<v Speaker 1>that's mine. So that's that's their strength. Tie they have

1:00:24.240 --> 1:00:28.360
<v Speaker 1>like the rigatoni and spicy vodka sauce. That's all right,

1:00:28.440 --> 1:00:33.080
<v Speaker 1>it's we're coming out to Vegas. Yeah, coming out.

1:00:33.120 --> 1:00:35.080
<v Speaker 3>We got to do this, Dan, Yeah done.

1:00:35.120 --> 1:00:36.840
<v Speaker 2>I think I think it'll be the first tourists ever

1:00:36.880 --> 1:00:43.840
<v Speaker 2>to come to Vegas. I don't know, but I guess

1:00:43.880 --> 1:00:44.560
<v Speaker 2>you would. Yeah.

1:00:45.040 --> 1:00:45.800
<v Speaker 3>Fair enough.

1:00:48.320 --> 1:00:51.479
<v Speaker 1>Of The Athletic The Athletic Football Show. We appreciate your time,

1:00:51.520 --> 1:00:54.640
<v Speaker 1>We appreciate you making us a little bit smarter. Hope

1:00:54.640 --> 1:00:56.360
<v Speaker 1>you get some sleep over the next couple of weeks.

1:00:56.400 --> 1:00:58.320
<v Speaker 1>I know, I know it can be kind of crazy

1:00:58.800 --> 1:01:01.120
<v Speaker 1>leading up to the draft and in the immediate aftermath.

1:01:01.160 --> 1:01:03.960
<v Speaker 1>But thank you so much for hopping on with us here.

1:01:04.320 --> 1:01:05.240
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for having me, guys.

1:01:05.240 --> 1:01:08.360
<v Speaker 1>This is a lot of fun, all right. There you go, Yeah,

1:01:08.560 --> 1:01:11.360
<v Speaker 1>Tice the Athletic Go check him out on The Athletic

1:01:11.360 --> 1:01:13.680
<v Speaker 1>Football Show. He and Robert May is doing an awesome

1:01:13.760 --> 1:01:16.880
<v Speaker 1>job breaking down all things NFL right now. Of course,

1:01:17.680 --> 1:01:21.040
<v Speaker 1>the big topic is the upcoming NFL draft, Daniel.

1:01:21.200 --> 1:01:24.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'm excited to watch. My very specific watch plan

1:01:24.120 --> 1:01:26.919
<v Speaker 3>is the same thing every year. It's Thursday night. I say,

1:01:27.040 --> 1:01:29.800
<v Speaker 3>oh man, here's the NFL Draft. I watch the first

1:01:29.800 --> 1:01:32.800
<v Speaker 3>seventeen picks. I go to bed, and then I wake

1:01:32.880 --> 1:01:36.200
<v Speaker 3>up the next morning and I say, WHOA, Okay, interesting.

1:01:36.600 --> 1:01:38.520
<v Speaker 3>And then I watched the first three picks of the

1:01:38.560 --> 1:01:40.640
<v Speaker 3>second round, and then I go do something else, and

1:01:40.680 --> 1:01:43.280
<v Speaker 3>I just keep checking my phone and I say whoa.

1:01:44.200 --> 1:01:46.760
<v Speaker 3>And I just keep doing that, and then I'll tune

1:01:46.840 --> 1:01:50.520
<v Speaker 3>back in and I'm always I always like seeing the

1:01:50.840 --> 1:01:53.000
<v Speaker 3>like the swap in and out of analysts on the

1:01:53.240 --> 1:01:56.800
<v Speaker 3>ESPN or NFL network set or whatever, and then them

1:01:56.920 --> 1:01:59.400
<v Speaker 3>start to get loopy deep into the draft where they

1:01:59.440 --> 1:02:01.400
<v Speaker 3>have to go to the back through. They're hungry, they're thirsty,

1:02:01.440 --> 1:02:05.200
<v Speaker 3>they're glassy eyed, they haven't slept in seventeen days. I

1:02:05.200 --> 1:02:08.880
<v Speaker 3>always like the wild card element of that. So I'm

1:02:08.920 --> 1:02:11.320
<v Speaker 3>in for all sorts of different amounts of fun with

1:02:11.360 --> 1:02:12.280
<v Speaker 3>the draft. I love it.

1:02:12.760 --> 1:02:16.520
<v Speaker 1>My best draft memory was back in twenty thirteen. I

1:02:16.560 --> 1:02:18.320
<v Speaker 1>can't tell you who was picked, but that was the

1:02:18.440 --> 1:02:22.720
<v Speaker 1>year I had my reconstructive shoulder surgery. Okay, and you

1:02:22.800 --> 1:02:24.760
<v Speaker 1>just I mean, you can't do anything. I watched all

1:02:24.800 --> 1:02:27.480
<v Speaker 1>of the Wire and all of the NFL Draft in

1:02:27.520 --> 1:02:29.480
<v Speaker 1>the span of like two weeks.

1:02:29.840 --> 1:02:30.560
<v Speaker 3>Weird combo.

1:02:30.960 --> 1:02:33.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's true. They do get loopy after a while

1:02:34.240 --> 1:02:36.479
<v Speaker 1>because it's all filler. And you know from doing this show,

1:02:36.480 --> 1:02:39.680
<v Speaker 1>we do what an hour hour and fifteen minute show

1:02:39.720 --> 1:02:42.560
<v Speaker 1>here a couple times a week. Even within the span

1:02:42.600 --> 1:02:45.080
<v Speaker 1>of this show. We try to limit the amount of

1:02:45.120 --> 1:02:50.040
<v Speaker 1>filler that we have, but it happens. It's inevitable. Those guys,

1:02:51.240 --> 1:02:53.880
<v Speaker 1>those guys have to deal with it. I can't imagine

1:02:53.880 --> 1:02:56.240
<v Speaker 1>what it's like to try and host that coverage, what

1:02:56.280 --> 1:02:59.120
<v Speaker 1>it's like to try and provide a different slant when

1:02:59.160 --> 1:03:02.600
<v Speaker 1>you're on day talking about guys. No one's ever heard

1:03:02.640 --> 1:03:06.720
<v Speaker 1>of doing interviews trying to move the coverage seven hours

1:03:06.800 --> 1:03:11.520
<v Speaker 1>day here, it's it. I'm equally as impressed by the

1:03:11.720 --> 1:03:15.000
<v Speaker 1>level of analysis as I am by just the production

1:03:15.360 --> 1:03:17.360
<v Speaker 1>behind the scenes of keeping the thing afloat.

1:03:17.840 --> 1:03:19.920
<v Speaker 3>Have you ever watched it from the other side, where

1:03:19.960 --> 1:03:23.960
<v Speaker 3>like the Cults or the Bengals or the Cowboys, you

1:03:24.000 --> 1:03:27.400
<v Speaker 3>get to see the behind the scenes show. Whether it's

1:03:27.640 --> 1:03:30.240
<v Speaker 3>I mean, there's a hard Knocks in season now, there's

1:03:30.240 --> 1:03:32.600
<v Speaker 3>all sorts of behind the are some teams just film

1:03:32.600 --> 1:03:35.480
<v Speaker 3>it themselves. And of course it's the very serious.

1:03:35.240 --> 1:03:37.840
<v Speaker 2>War room, right, it's the draft war room.

1:03:38.240 --> 1:03:42.280
<v Speaker 3>They're like they're doing something extremely internationally important. And there's

1:03:42.360 --> 1:03:44.920
<v Speaker 3>thirty seven people in a room and they're all pumping

1:03:44.960 --> 1:03:47.560
<v Speaker 3>their fists because they got their like number seven linebacker

1:03:47.560 --> 1:03:50.200
<v Speaker 3>in the fourth round. And I know this is their lives.

1:03:50.240 --> 1:03:52.200
<v Speaker 3>I know this is their jobs. I know all of

1:03:52.240 --> 1:03:55.400
<v Speaker 3>the seriousness that goes with like making the correct or

1:03:55.440 --> 1:04:00.360
<v Speaker 3>indirect indirect decision. But the seriousness with which those shows

1:04:00.440 --> 1:04:05.240
<v Speaker 3>are edited and the compounds, the facilities are laid out,

1:04:05.280 --> 1:04:08.160
<v Speaker 3>and the giant whiteboards and the moving pieces, it does

1:04:08.280 --> 1:04:08.960
<v Speaker 3>make me giggle.

1:04:09.000 --> 1:04:09.360
<v Speaker 2>Tie.

1:04:09.400 --> 1:04:12.600
<v Speaker 1>It makes me giggle that it's.

1:04:11.760 --> 1:04:16.080
<v Speaker 3>This industry and this war room and like the phone

1:04:16.080 --> 1:04:20.280
<v Speaker 3>calls all right, let's do it. Yeah, it's great. It's

1:04:20.400 --> 1:04:22.439
<v Speaker 3>I love the theater of it all. And I don't

1:04:22.480 --> 1:04:24.960
<v Speaker 3>know how if you're a football fan you can't appreciate

1:04:25.000 --> 1:04:29.720
<v Speaker 3>how lovingly ridiculous it can all seem. Well, and on

1:04:29.800 --> 1:04:33.080
<v Speaker 3>top of it, the drafts in Vegas. Yep, the drafts

1:04:33.080 --> 1:04:34.840
<v Speaker 3>in Vegas. It was supposed to be in Vegas.

1:04:34.880 --> 1:04:37.000
<v Speaker 1>I think a couple of years ago, right, and yeah

1:04:37.080 --> 1:04:40.840
<v Speaker 1>when virtual Yeah, so I'm I'm curious to see the

1:04:41.000 --> 1:04:45.600
<v Speaker 1>pomp and circumstance, particularly as it relates to the first round,

1:04:45.720 --> 1:04:50.280
<v Speaker 1>because I have heard varying accounts of what that will

1:04:50.320 --> 1:04:53.800
<v Speaker 1>look like from a TV standpoint, and I'm excited for it.

1:04:54.080 --> 1:04:56.640
<v Speaker 3>Wait, do you have a song pick, like the song

1:04:56.720 --> 1:05:00.520
<v Speaker 3>of the year, the commercial bumper where it was like,

1:05:00.840 --> 1:05:03.680
<v Speaker 3>oh no, that's all Like, remember we called that like

1:05:03.720 --> 1:05:06.200
<v Speaker 3>in twenty sixteen or twenty thirteen or whatever year it

1:05:06.280 --> 1:05:08.880
<v Speaker 3>was we got it that one year. Yeah, well it's

1:05:09.080 --> 1:05:12.160
<v Speaker 3>there because you pay attention. I douse.

1:05:12.240 --> 1:05:13.840
<v Speaker 1>I need to think a little bit more about this.

1:05:14.280 --> 1:05:16.120
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it's something we could talk about on Thursday.

1:05:16.160 --> 1:05:17.439
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to have much more time.

1:05:17.520 --> 1:05:20.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm gonna come armed with a list of five songs.

1:05:20.520 --> 1:05:21.400
<v Speaker 3>I'm not going to look it up.

1:05:21.440 --> 1:05:23.560
<v Speaker 1>I think they may actually publicize it. I won't look

1:05:23.600 --> 1:05:25.840
<v Speaker 1>it up. Okay, that that spoils the fun.

1:05:25.920 --> 1:05:26.640
<v Speaker 3>I don't want to do that.

1:05:27.240 --> 1:05:30.520
<v Speaker 1>I will try to. I will comb through the top

1:05:30.560 --> 1:05:32.840
<v Speaker 1>forty list and see what pop songs I can come

1:05:32.920 --> 1:05:35.440
<v Speaker 1>up with that seemed like they would work. I have

1:05:35.480 --> 1:05:36.760
<v Speaker 1>a few off the top of my head, but I

1:05:36.800 --> 1:05:38.960
<v Speaker 1>need to. I need to actually put some research into

1:05:39.000 --> 1:05:39.400
<v Speaker 1>this one.

1:05:39.480 --> 1:05:42.200
<v Speaker 3>Are you a Vegas person, by the way, I'm a

1:05:42.280 --> 1:05:47.240
<v Speaker 3>Vegas person for forty eight hours max? Yeah, anything more

1:05:47.320 --> 1:05:50.520
<v Speaker 3>than that, and uh, you know, maybe it's different if

1:05:50.520 --> 1:05:51.040
<v Speaker 3>you live there.

1:05:51.080 --> 1:05:51.960
<v Speaker 1>If it you know, you kind of.

1:05:51.920 --> 1:05:52.560
<v Speaker 3>Put roots down.

1:05:52.600 --> 1:05:55.600
<v Speaker 1>It's a full on city. Yeah, that's different. But as

1:05:55.640 --> 1:06:01.200
<v Speaker 1>for a tourist destination, I forty eight hours, maybe seventy

1:06:01.240 --> 1:06:02.760
<v Speaker 1>two hours tops, but after.

1:06:02.560 --> 1:06:03.360
<v Speaker 2>That, it's time.

1:06:03.520 --> 1:06:04.640
<v Speaker 3>What are your priorities there?

1:06:05.520 --> 1:06:07.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean the priorities use Well, I've been out there

1:06:07.920 --> 1:06:10.680
<v Speaker 1>for the NCAA tournament, which is awesome. Yeah, it's a

1:06:10.720 --> 1:06:14.600
<v Speaker 1>great time on Incidemat tournament, and the priority was hard

1:06:14.640 --> 1:06:16.760
<v Speaker 1>gambling when I was there.

1:06:16.560 --> 1:06:19.480
<v Speaker 3>On basketball, on table games.

1:06:19.080 --> 1:06:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Well on what well, I was there for college basketball,

1:06:21.040 --> 1:06:23.800
<v Speaker 1>so it was it was basically wagering on as many

1:06:23.840 --> 1:06:27.040
<v Speaker 1>games as possible, okay, and then playing blackjack. But that

1:06:27.200 --> 1:06:31.040
<v Speaker 1>was also before all of these things became more mainstream

1:06:31.360 --> 1:06:34.120
<v Speaker 1>and more prevalent pretty much anywhere you live. Sure, so

1:06:34.200 --> 1:06:35.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure what the preference would be if I

1:06:35.840 --> 1:06:38.000
<v Speaker 1>went back, but at least the time I was there,

1:06:38.040 --> 1:06:41.440
<v Speaker 1>the one time I was in Vegas, it was pretty much,

1:06:41.520 --> 1:06:43.040
<v Speaker 1>let's watch as much basketball as we can.

1:06:43.080 --> 1:06:45.160
<v Speaker 3>Oh, that's the only time. That was the Loane visit

1:06:45.200 --> 1:06:48.720
<v Speaker 3>to Vegas, Okay, the only time. Yeah, Yeah, Vegas is

1:06:48.720 --> 1:06:50.760
<v Speaker 3>pretty good. I'm not a gambler, I'm not a drinker.

1:06:50.800 --> 1:06:53.760
<v Speaker 3>I'm not a clubber. I'm not a strip club person.

1:06:53.960 --> 1:06:58.400
<v Speaker 3>But man, in my old age, do I just want

1:06:58.440 --> 1:07:00.600
<v Speaker 3>to go and eat all of the food. It is

1:07:00.680 --> 1:07:03.320
<v Speaker 3>such a great restaurant city, not even just the strip,

1:07:03.320 --> 1:07:06.320
<v Speaker 3>even beyond that that. That's to me why I would

1:07:06.400 --> 1:07:09.480
<v Speaker 3>return to just and you know, go to a comedy

1:07:09.480 --> 1:07:11.320
<v Speaker 3>show or two or something like that. But man, so

1:07:11.400 --> 1:07:13.920
<v Speaker 3>many restaurants I want to try out in the desert.

1:07:14.040 --> 1:07:16.400
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, that's all I have to contribute to that.

1:07:16.600 --> 1:07:19.880
<v Speaker 3>And oh, man, Vegas, Yeah, I haven't been in a

1:07:19.920 --> 1:07:22.600
<v Speaker 3>long time, long long time. Yeah, I would like to

1:07:22.600 --> 1:07:25.680
<v Speaker 3>go back. All right, that's all. I think. That's all

1:07:25.720 --> 1:07:30.080
<v Speaker 3>I have. I would be remiss on another level, though, Tie.

1:07:30.280 --> 1:07:33.760
<v Speaker 3>Maybe somebody found our show through Nate or through the

1:07:33.840 --> 1:07:36.080
<v Speaker 3>Draft or something like that, or just found it recently,

1:07:36.520 --> 1:07:40.000
<v Speaker 3>and I imagine somebody says to themselves, you know, the

1:07:40.040 --> 1:07:43.600
<v Speaker 3>content's okay, but damn, do Dan and Tie sound good?

1:07:43.920 --> 1:07:46.959
<v Speaker 3>We've gotten that note? Like, man, you guys sound good,

1:07:47.320 --> 1:07:48.920
<v Speaker 3>and I want I got to tell you just in

1:07:48.960 --> 1:07:51.920
<v Speaker 3>the light of in light of I guess these past

1:07:51.920 --> 1:07:56.040
<v Speaker 3>few days, it's definitely Tie. It's definitely Tie. Who makes

1:07:56.080 --> 1:07:58.920
<v Speaker 3>this show sound as good as it does. I've gotten better,

1:07:59.440 --> 1:08:02.200
<v Speaker 3>but it's definitely Tie. And so I just want to

1:08:02.200 --> 1:08:04.360
<v Speaker 3>give you a bit of a background after these past

1:08:04.360 --> 1:08:09.320
<v Speaker 3>few days, if you'd like to know why our show

1:08:09.480 --> 1:08:15.200
<v Speaker 3>sounds so good and so legendary. It's from the majestic

1:08:16.240 --> 1:08:19.519
<v Speaker 3>heights of the Steel Stacks. What is this to the

1:08:19.560 --> 1:08:23.519
<v Speaker 3>insight of the National Museum of Industrial History, the whispering

1:08:23.560 --> 1:08:26.680
<v Speaker 3>winds of Klein Farms, Tie, the wonder of the Da

1:08:26.760 --> 1:08:31.480
<v Speaker 3>Vinci Science Center, and up to the peaks and vistas

1:08:31.479 --> 1:08:34.040
<v Speaker 3>of Hawk Mountain and the Wildlands Conservancy.

1:08:34.320 --> 1:08:36.240
<v Speaker 1>I hear the birds. I hear the birds. Those are

1:08:36.240 --> 1:08:38.200
<v Speaker 1>not real birds. They sound like they're right next door.

1:08:38.520 --> 1:08:44.200
<v Speaker 3>It's the crisp compression, the legendarily unforgiving noise gates, an

1:08:44.280 --> 1:08:52.120
<v Speaker 3>unmatched EQ Welcome to the mesmerizing digital audio landscape of

1:08:52.320 --> 1:08:54.000
<v Speaker 3>tay Gusta National.

1:08:53.840 --> 1:08:56.599
<v Speaker 1>This is the dumbest thing you've ever done.

1:08:57.000 --> 1:09:02.920
<v Speaker 3>I love it. It's pretty good, right is great? I

1:09:03.640 --> 1:09:06.400
<v Speaker 3>heard it yesterday and I was like, I don't know,

1:09:06.439 --> 1:09:08.559
<v Speaker 3>I got to make this a stupid podcast thing because

1:09:08.600 --> 1:09:12.920
<v Speaker 3>that's how my brain is has been shattered into uh

1:09:13.840 --> 1:09:17.040
<v Speaker 3>what a track? And I did throw in fake bird sounds. Ty,

1:09:17.560 --> 1:09:22.200
<v Speaker 3>you got some goldfinches, some robins, and there I did.

1:09:22.840 --> 1:09:25.760
<v Speaker 3>I found, I found the track. And then I said, well,

1:09:25.800 --> 1:09:28.439
<v Speaker 3>I've heard you know, CBS and the Masters they pipe

1:09:28.479 --> 1:09:30.519
<v Speaker 3>in the bird sounds, and who would I be not

1:09:30.560 --> 1:09:31.240
<v Speaker 3>to do the same.

1:09:32.160 --> 1:09:34.400
<v Speaker 1>They've got like a cardinal micd up. You can hear

1:09:34.400 --> 1:09:35.120
<v Speaker 1>it on some holes.

1:09:35.120 --> 1:09:37.840
<v Speaker 3>It's very it's pretty I looked up bird sounds you

1:09:37.880 --> 1:09:43.960
<v Speaker 3>can hear right. Yeah, how's the mix to you? It's good.

1:09:44.280 --> 1:09:46.640
<v Speaker 3>You did. You're pretty good to you.

1:09:46.640 --> 1:09:47.679
<v Speaker 1>Give yourself a little.

1:09:47.439 --> 1:09:47.920
<v Speaker 3>Bit of credit.

1:09:47.920 --> 1:09:49.439
<v Speaker 1>You've done all the nuggets. You've done a lot of

1:09:49.439 --> 1:09:49.920
<v Speaker 1>our shows.

1:09:49.920 --> 1:09:51.760
<v Speaker 3>You know what you're doing. I know, I know. It's

1:09:52.040 --> 1:10:01.200
<v Speaker 3>just Tygusta National and hello friends. Oh so I took

1:10:01.240 --> 1:10:04.440
<v Speaker 3>such a good nap yesterday. It's so good.

1:10:05.160 --> 1:10:10.240
<v Speaker 1>Congratulations Scotti, Scheffler. Yeah, hook them Texas Texas grad. Yeah,

1:10:10.280 --> 1:10:13.880
<v Speaker 1>Texas finally wins something. Yeah, good on him ran away

1:10:13.920 --> 1:10:16.160
<v Speaker 1>with it in the end. Yeah, I mean Texas in

1:10:16.240 --> 1:10:20.040
<v Speaker 1>their lone huge football win. Beat Georgia, and so there's

1:10:20.040 --> 1:10:23.080
<v Speaker 1>some sort of alignment there of Scotty chef Jordan Spi

1:10:23.360 --> 1:10:27.320
<v Speaker 1>has won the Masters. Also a ut guy, Scotti Scheffler,

1:10:27.320 --> 1:10:31.080
<v Speaker 1>originally from I think Ridgeway, New Jersey, which is fairly

1:10:31.080 --> 1:10:32.840
<v Speaker 1>close to me, but moved down to Texas. More of

1:10:32.880 --> 1:10:37.599
<v Speaker 1>a Texas guy golf school. Yeah. Absolutely, so, well, look,

1:10:37.840 --> 1:10:40.080
<v Speaker 1>this has been a fun show. Nate Tice. Go check

1:10:40.160 --> 1:10:43.599
<v Speaker 1>him out. We're huge fans of Nate's work. The show

1:10:43.640 --> 1:10:46.000
<v Speaker 1>that he does with Robert Mays is awesome. If you're

1:10:46.000 --> 1:10:49.960
<v Speaker 1>into all things pro football, go check out the Athletic

1:10:50.120 --> 1:10:54.040
<v Speaker 1>NFL Show. We'll be back on Thursday. I'm going to

1:10:54.120 --> 1:10:56.439
<v Speaker 1>talk a little bit more about basically what's going on

1:10:56.520 --> 1:10:58.280
<v Speaker 1>in college football. I know that's what we do here.

1:10:58.479 --> 1:10:59.760
<v Speaker 3>It is a college football show.

1:10:59.800 --> 1:11:02.679
<v Speaker 1>But now that we actually have some things to discuss,

1:11:03.360 --> 1:11:07.360
<v Speaker 1>albeit scant with spring games just kind of starting up

1:11:07.360 --> 1:11:09.439
<v Speaker 1>here in the month of April, we'll do our best

1:11:09.439 --> 1:11:11.840
<v Speaker 1>to provide a recap of that. And are we doing

1:11:11.880 --> 1:11:12.599
<v Speaker 1>the Q and A show?

1:11:12.640 --> 1:11:13.880
<v Speaker 3>Is that is that the Yeah? I think we're gonna

1:11:13.880 --> 1:11:14.640
<v Speaker 3>do a MEGAQ and A.

1:11:15.080 --> 1:11:18.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. So if you've got questions, if you've got things

1:11:18.280 --> 1:11:20.280
<v Speaker 1>that are pressing that you want to talk more about,

1:11:20.680 --> 1:11:22.920
<v Speaker 1>hit us up Solidverbal at gmail dot com. Of course,

1:11:22.960 --> 1:11:25.759
<v Speaker 1>if you are on the Patreon at verbowlers dot com,

1:11:26.040 --> 1:11:29.120
<v Speaker 1>you can always send us in your thoughts via discord

1:11:29.240 --> 1:11:32.559
<v Speaker 1>via Patreon itself. We'd love to get your thoughts on

1:11:33.000 --> 1:11:35.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, what's going on in college football and what

1:11:35.200 --> 1:11:37.120
<v Speaker 1>types of things we should address next, but we'll do

1:11:37.200 --> 1:11:40.160
<v Speaker 1>that on Thursday. Don't forget in the meantime if you

1:11:40.200 --> 1:11:42.679
<v Speaker 1>did happen upon this show, didn't know about us before,

1:11:42.760 --> 1:11:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Welcome on in Everybody's welcome. Thank you to ty Gustin

1:11:48.360 --> 1:11:52.639
<v Speaker 1>National whatever we're calling this. Yeah, hit the subscriber follow button.

1:11:52.640 --> 1:11:55.840
<v Speaker 1>We'd love to have you back for another show. And last,

1:11:55.840 --> 1:11:57.760
<v Speaker 1>but not least, go to solid giveaway dot com. We

1:11:57.800 --> 1:12:00.880
<v Speaker 1>are giving away free signed aj Brown Minnie helmet. You

1:12:00.880 --> 1:12:02.400
<v Speaker 1>got a couple of weeks to get your name in.

1:12:02.400 --> 1:12:05.920
<v Speaker 3>That hat, all right? So I got notable who's a

1:12:05.960 --> 1:12:12.479
<v Speaker 3>notable Butler? Welcome like welcome to Darius Butler Cabin. I'm

1:12:12.479 --> 1:12:15.960
<v Speaker 3>so sorry for that guy over there, my good friend

1:12:16.040 --> 1:12:18.320
<v Speaker 3>Dan Rubinstein, form myself Tie Hill in the brand. Thanks

1:12:18.360 --> 1:12:21.000
<v Speaker 3>so much for downloading, listening and playing along with our badness.

1:12:21.000 --> 1:12:21.400
<v Speaker 3>At home.

1:12:21.840 --> 1:12:23.519
<v Speaker 1>We'll talk to you all in a few days, and meantime,

1:12:23.560 --> 1:12:24.880
<v Speaker 1>stay solid, peace,