1 00:00:03,800 --> 00:00:06,440 Speaker 1: It's the big take from Bloomberg News and I Heart Radio. 2 00:00:06,800 --> 00:00:11,959 Speaker 1: I'm West Gasova today. Why are billionaires parking piles of 3 00:00:12,000 --> 00:00:21,119 Speaker 1: money intended for charity instead of giving it to charity? 4 00:00:26,079 --> 00:00:29,440 Speaker 1: You know that old f Scott Fitzgerald expression, The rich 5 00:00:29,480 --> 00:00:32,040 Speaker 1: are different from you and me. That might as well 6 00:00:32,120 --> 00:00:36,239 Speaker 1: be the title of today's show. For several years, prominent 7 00:00:36,400 --> 00:00:39,640 Speaker 1: billionaires have been joining the Giving pledge. That's where they 8 00:00:39,720 --> 00:00:43,040 Speaker 1: publicly promised to give away. Some are all over their fortunes. 9 00:00:43,640 --> 00:00:46,200 Speaker 1: But unlike the rest of us, we drop a dollar 10 00:00:46,240 --> 00:00:48,520 Speaker 1: in the jar right at check for charities we care about. 11 00:00:48,880 --> 00:00:52,599 Speaker 1: The super rich do it differently. One way is by 12 00:00:52,680 --> 00:00:56,080 Speaker 1: using a thing called a donor advised fund that lets 13 00:00:56,120 --> 00:00:59,920 Speaker 1: them set aside money to give away without saying when 14 00:01:00,080 --> 00:01:02,880 Speaker 1: they'll give it away or who's going to get it. 15 00:01:03,920 --> 00:01:06,280 Speaker 1: You might ask why would they want to do this? 16 00:01:06,920 --> 00:01:11,560 Speaker 1: Bloomberger reporters Noah Boo Hire, Sophie Alexander and Ben Steveman 17 00:01:11,680 --> 00:01:14,520 Speaker 1: delve deep into the world of donor advised funds, and 18 00:01:14,680 --> 00:01:19,000 Speaker 1: they are here with answers. No, let's start with you. 19 00:01:19,280 --> 00:01:25,120 Speaker 1: How exactly is using a donor advised fund different from 20 00:01:25,120 --> 00:01:27,640 Speaker 1: giving an annual contribution to a charity at the end 21 00:01:27,640 --> 00:01:30,279 Speaker 1: of the year. Yeah, it is, it is, and it isn't. 22 00:01:30,520 --> 00:01:33,280 Speaker 1: One of the things that's so interesting is that you 23 00:01:33,319 --> 00:01:36,080 Speaker 1: get the tax break up front, so when you're going 24 00:01:36,160 --> 00:01:39,039 Speaker 1: to file your tax return, it's effectively the same thing. 25 00:01:39,400 --> 00:01:41,679 Speaker 1: But the money is sitting there. It's it's there for 26 00:01:41,760 --> 00:01:45,120 Speaker 1: charitable purposes. You can't pull it back, but it actually 27 00:01:45,160 --> 00:01:48,080 Speaker 1: hasn't made its way to a working charity yet. They 28 00:01:48,120 --> 00:01:51,600 Speaker 1: can sit there indefinitely. And there's a variety of reasons 29 00:01:51,600 --> 00:01:54,000 Speaker 1: why you might want to do that. There's tax reasons, 30 00:01:54,040 --> 00:01:57,040 Speaker 1: of course, and that's the big one. There's also, you know, 31 00:01:57,120 --> 00:02:00,000 Speaker 1: like family purposes, similar reasons to why people set up 32 00:02:00,080 --> 00:02:03,040 Speaker 1: a private foundation. Is that you you want to get 33 00:02:03,040 --> 00:02:05,880 Speaker 1: the family together and say, Okay, we're gonna start focusing 34 00:02:06,000 --> 00:02:09,080 Speaker 1: on these charitable causes. Let's talk about it. We have 35 00:02:09,200 --> 00:02:12,480 Speaker 1: this money that's dedicated, but there is, like we've said, 36 00:02:12,520 --> 00:02:14,880 Speaker 1: no deadline for one, that money actually has to go 37 00:02:14,919 --> 00:02:19,280 Speaker 1: out to working charities like food banks, home letch shelters, etcetera. 38 00:02:19,360 --> 00:02:21,880 Speaker 1: All right, so let's take this apart just a bit. 39 00:02:22,240 --> 00:02:25,440 Speaker 1: So then we've heard private foundations, and we've heard donor 40 00:02:25,480 --> 00:02:28,440 Speaker 1: advised funds. What are the difference between those two things. 41 00:02:29,040 --> 00:02:32,560 Speaker 1: A private foundation is a charity that's set up basically 42 00:02:32,600 --> 00:02:36,320 Speaker 1: by one person, by one family to give their money away. 43 00:02:36,480 --> 00:02:40,240 Speaker 1: In practice, they're both pools of money yourmark for charity, 44 00:02:40,280 --> 00:02:44,440 Speaker 1: but the private foundation, because of some controversies in the 45 00:02:44,520 --> 00:02:49,080 Speaker 1: nineties sixties, basically there are much stricter rules on what 46 00:02:49,360 --> 00:02:52,520 Speaker 1: a wealthy family can do with their private foundation, like 47 00:02:52,600 --> 00:02:55,959 Speaker 1: what well they have to disclose what they do every year, 48 00:02:56,040 --> 00:02:58,760 Speaker 1: where the money goes, and where's the money is coming from, 49 00:02:59,040 --> 00:03:01,639 Speaker 1: and also what they're invested in, and they have very 50 00:03:01,680 --> 00:03:04,160 Speaker 1: strict rules on where that money can go in terms 51 00:03:04,160 --> 00:03:07,160 Speaker 1: of can it be invested in a family business generally 52 00:03:07,240 --> 00:03:10,680 Speaker 1: know and and also the key thing is they have 53 00:03:10,880 --> 00:03:14,919 Speaker 1: to pay out basically five percent of their assets every year. 54 00:03:15,240 --> 00:03:17,359 Speaker 1: So you can't just set these things up and let 55 00:03:17,400 --> 00:03:20,520 Speaker 1: them sit The money that you've got the tax aduction 56 00:03:20,560 --> 00:03:24,000 Speaker 1: for that money needs to go out to charity every 57 00:03:24,080 --> 00:03:27,880 Speaker 1: year on a regular basis. What we're talking about in 58 00:03:27,919 --> 00:03:29,680 Speaker 1: this story and what we've been doing a lot of 59 00:03:29,680 --> 00:03:34,080 Speaker 1: reporting on is not just donor advised funds, but specifically 60 00:03:34,240 --> 00:03:37,960 Speaker 1: private foundations which have all these rules around them. Giving 61 00:03:38,000 --> 00:03:40,839 Speaker 1: to donor advised funds, which don't have very many rules 62 00:03:40,880 --> 00:03:46,080 Speaker 1: around them, and so what we're seeing is that it's 63 00:03:46,120 --> 00:03:49,480 Speaker 1: not just the accumulation of money and donor advised funds, 64 00:03:49,520 --> 00:03:54,840 Speaker 1: but the money that coming from private foundations going into 65 00:03:54,880 --> 00:03:58,560 Speaker 1: donnor advised funds also seems to be rising. A big 66 00:03:58,600 --> 00:04:03,040 Speaker 1: part of this reporting was going out and scraping hundreds 67 00:04:03,040 --> 00:04:06,040 Speaker 1: of thousands of files that the i r S has 68 00:04:06,080 --> 00:04:12,320 Speaker 1: released publicly on the activities of private foundations. And every year, 69 00:04:12,600 --> 00:04:16,080 Speaker 1: private foundations are required to put out a filing that 70 00:04:16,200 --> 00:04:20,840 Speaker 1: lists the grants that they made. So what we did was, 71 00:04:21,320 --> 00:04:24,880 Speaker 1: through the magic of computers, assemble a database of more 72 00:04:24,880 --> 00:04:28,240 Speaker 1: than four million grants that private foundations have made in 73 00:04:28,279 --> 00:04:32,239 Speaker 1: the past several years, and then we sifted through them 74 00:04:32,520 --> 00:04:35,760 Speaker 1: to look for grants that were made specifically to the 75 00:04:35,880 --> 00:04:40,040 Speaker 1: major sponsors of donor advised funds. And then we added 76 00:04:40,080 --> 00:04:43,400 Speaker 1: all of that up and found that more than four 77 00:04:43,520 --> 00:04:48,080 Speaker 1: billion dollars has moved through this pipeline, which is a 78 00:04:48,160 --> 00:04:51,440 Speaker 1: staggering amount of money. It's you know, private foundations by 79 00:04:51,480 --> 00:04:54,200 Speaker 1: and large are giving to other things. This is a 80 00:04:54,279 --> 00:04:59,200 Speaker 1: small niche activity for private foundations. But when you drilled 81 00:04:59,240 --> 00:05:02,920 Speaker 1: down into the trull filings. You see that some private 82 00:05:02,960 --> 00:05:07,080 Speaker 1: foundations are employing this as their main strategy for giving 83 00:05:07,080 --> 00:05:10,719 Speaker 1: away money or the only way that they're giving away money. Literally, 84 00:05:10,760 --> 00:05:13,440 Speaker 1: a hundred of the dollars that is leaving the private 85 00:05:13,480 --> 00:05:18,120 Speaker 1: foundation is ending up with a death. And that that 86 00:05:18,200 --> 00:05:21,599 Speaker 1: four billion dollars is a conservative estimate because we're only 87 00:05:21,600 --> 00:05:24,960 Speaker 1: looking at digital filings, and no, it could speak better 88 00:05:25,000 --> 00:05:27,640 Speaker 1: to that. But for example, who was it Larry Page, 89 00:05:28,120 --> 00:05:31,320 Speaker 1: one of the co founders of Google. Right, he filed 90 00:05:31,360 --> 00:05:34,080 Speaker 1: on paper, and so that's not included in this analysis, 91 00:05:34,600 --> 00:05:36,800 Speaker 1: and if it had been, that would be what another 92 00:05:36,839 --> 00:05:40,600 Speaker 1: half a billion dollars something like that, right, yeah, correct, 93 00:05:40,920 --> 00:05:43,960 Speaker 1: This is just the tip of the iceberg. And the 94 00:05:44,000 --> 00:05:47,000 Speaker 1: fact of the matter is when these transfers happened, the 95 00:05:47,040 --> 00:05:50,359 Speaker 1: paper trail and the transparency about where the money is 96 00:05:50,400 --> 00:05:53,800 Speaker 1: going really dries up, and it requires the work of 97 00:05:53,880 --> 00:05:56,600 Speaker 1: journalists and others to really dig into what's going on, 98 00:05:56,760 --> 00:05:59,960 Speaker 1: which defies the intent of a law that Congress paths 99 00:06:00,160 --> 00:06:03,640 Speaker 1: more than fifty years ago to provide some accountability around 100 00:06:03,640 --> 00:06:07,479 Speaker 1: how philanthropic dollars are spent. I would add that one 101 00:06:07,520 --> 00:06:09,599 Speaker 1: of the concerns here is that this is going to 102 00:06:09,640 --> 00:06:14,719 Speaker 1: become standard operating procedure for more and more wealthy families 103 00:06:14,760 --> 00:06:18,119 Speaker 1: that have these foundations. They're busy, they don't have time. 104 00:06:18,480 --> 00:06:20,600 Speaker 1: Let's just put the money in a daff and let 105 00:06:20,640 --> 00:06:23,720 Speaker 1: it sit there. And this used to be something that 106 00:06:23,960 --> 00:06:28,320 Speaker 1: was definitely frowned upon. Now it's become something that your 107 00:06:28,360 --> 00:06:30,440 Speaker 1: advisor might tell you to do at the end of 108 00:06:30,440 --> 00:06:32,600 Speaker 1: the year so that you make sure you follow the rules, 109 00:06:32,800 --> 00:06:35,160 Speaker 1: and you might not think about it. So it deserves 110 00:06:35,160 --> 00:06:39,280 Speaker 1: some attention as something that really does bypass the spirit 111 00:06:39,520 --> 00:06:42,200 Speaker 1: of the rules that we put in place when we 112 00:06:42,279 --> 00:06:46,479 Speaker 1: give people text advantages for charitable giving. I suppose it's 113 00:06:46,480 --> 00:06:49,040 Speaker 1: important to note that when we're talking about viotling the spirit. 114 00:06:49,120 --> 00:06:51,320 Speaker 1: None of this is illegal. It doesn't violate any laws. 115 00:06:51,320 --> 00:06:54,240 Speaker 1: Are actually doing what these things were set up to do, 116 00:06:54,400 --> 00:06:57,600 Speaker 1: and all of it is legal. It's all legal. It's 117 00:06:57,640 --> 00:07:00,920 Speaker 1: all above board. No one is us seeing anything other 118 00:07:00,960 --> 00:07:05,359 Speaker 1: than that. Yeah, So so he who's giving money into 119 00:07:05,400 --> 00:07:07,680 Speaker 1: these funds, because it sounds like they're being used for 120 00:07:07,960 --> 00:07:11,920 Speaker 1: our purpose. Sometimes that's not really about charity. Yeah, A 121 00:07:12,000 --> 00:07:15,160 Speaker 1: variety of people use these funds. You know, Fidelity is 122 00:07:15,200 --> 00:07:18,760 Speaker 1: the biggest provider of donor advised funds in the US, 123 00:07:19,040 --> 00:07:22,760 Speaker 1: and they really market themselves as for the everyman. So 124 00:07:22,880 --> 00:07:25,840 Speaker 1: you know, their median account size is under twenty five 125 00:07:25,880 --> 00:07:29,120 Speaker 1: thousand dollars, So you could just be an average Joe 126 00:07:29,320 --> 00:07:31,880 Speaker 1: who is, you know, retired and looking to give away 127 00:07:31,920 --> 00:07:34,400 Speaker 1: some money. But we also have a lot of billionaires 128 00:07:34,440 --> 00:07:37,320 Speaker 1: who use these things. In our reporting, we came across 129 00:07:37,400 --> 00:07:40,400 Speaker 1: a lot of hedge fund billionaires because what we were 130 00:07:40,400 --> 00:07:44,239 Speaker 1: looking at was specifically people sending money to donnor advised 131 00:07:44,280 --> 00:07:47,720 Speaker 1: funds from private foundations, and so a lot of hedge 132 00:07:47,720 --> 00:07:51,000 Speaker 1: fund managers set up private foundations and then they're able 133 00:07:51,040 --> 00:07:53,960 Speaker 1: to invest in their own funds, and then to meet 134 00:07:53,960 --> 00:07:56,240 Speaker 1: the five percent minimum, they send the money to a 135 00:07:56,240 --> 00:07:59,800 Speaker 1: donor advice fund where they don't have any deadline, but 136 00:08:00,320 --> 00:08:03,680 Speaker 1: they meet the five percent requirement. So it's really just 137 00:08:03,720 --> 00:08:06,680 Speaker 1: for people who are looking to get tax benefits. It's 138 00:08:06,720 --> 00:08:10,000 Speaker 1: also for people who are looking to use technology to 139 00:08:10,160 --> 00:08:16,840 Speaker 1: give away money more easily. And so if you have 140 00:08:17,200 --> 00:08:20,400 Speaker 1: your own private foundation, it has to pay out five 141 00:08:20,400 --> 00:08:22,640 Speaker 1: percent of a year, but you can then take that 142 00:08:22,720 --> 00:08:26,440 Speaker 1: money instead and put it into a donor advised fund 143 00:08:26,600 --> 00:08:28,400 Speaker 1: and tell them not to spend it. And therefore you 144 00:08:28,440 --> 00:08:31,760 Speaker 1: just kind of keep your money exactly. You know, this 145 00:08:31,840 --> 00:08:35,520 Speaker 1: is unintentional. Really, the idea of them dates back decades 146 00:08:35,559 --> 00:08:38,960 Speaker 1: and decades, but they really became popular when financial companies 147 00:08:39,000 --> 00:08:43,520 Speaker 1: embraced the idea of offering these accounts and they became 148 00:08:43,760 --> 00:08:47,360 Speaker 1: a marketing thing. Basically, financial companies started marketing them to 149 00:08:47,920 --> 00:08:51,640 Speaker 1: wealthy people, people with money, and that really started a 150 00:08:51,640 --> 00:08:54,280 Speaker 1: flow of billions of dollars into them starting in the 151 00:08:54,360 --> 00:08:58,240 Speaker 1: nineties and early two thousand's why were donor advised funds 152 00:08:58,280 --> 00:09:01,040 Speaker 1: created in the first place, what was there original purpose. 153 00:09:01,720 --> 00:09:04,120 Speaker 1: One of the advantages of donor advised funds is that 154 00:09:04,240 --> 00:09:06,640 Speaker 1: you can take a private investment that you own and 155 00:09:06,679 --> 00:09:08,880 Speaker 1: you can put it in a donor advice fund, and 156 00:09:08,880 --> 00:09:11,240 Speaker 1: then the donor advice fund will sell it and then 157 00:09:11,280 --> 00:09:13,400 Speaker 1: that money can go to charity. You might not be 158 00:09:13,480 --> 00:09:17,480 Speaker 1: able to give a stock or a piece of a 159 00:09:17,520 --> 00:09:19,240 Speaker 1: private business or a piece of real estate to your 160 00:09:19,280 --> 00:09:21,720 Speaker 1: local food bank, for example. They're not going to know 161 00:09:21,760 --> 00:09:24,120 Speaker 1: what to do with that asset. So there are some 162 00:09:24,160 --> 00:09:26,920 Speaker 1: things like that about donor advice funds that just make 163 00:09:26,960 --> 00:09:29,480 Speaker 1: it more convenient to give money away. So that's sort 164 00:09:29,520 --> 00:09:32,720 Speaker 1: of like the positive argument I guess for donor advice 165 00:09:32,800 --> 00:09:36,240 Speaker 1: funds and why they should exist. But again, there's these 166 00:09:36,400 --> 00:09:39,679 Speaker 1: other issues with donor advised funds that have really created 167 00:09:39,679 --> 00:09:42,040 Speaker 1: a lot of controversy. So now we have a pretty 168 00:09:42,080 --> 00:09:46,280 Speaker 1: good understanding of what donor advice fund is. In your story, 169 00:09:46,360 --> 00:09:49,920 Speaker 1: you write about how some of the best known investors 170 00:09:49,920 --> 00:09:53,719 Speaker 1: from some prominent names are using these. No, what are 171 00:09:53,840 --> 00:09:55,640 Speaker 1: some of the examples of the big names who are 172 00:09:55,720 --> 00:10:00,559 Speaker 1: taking advantage of this investment vehicle. We documented that people 173 00:10:00,600 --> 00:10:05,520 Speaker 1: like Elon Musk, the founders of Google, hedge fund, billionaires, 174 00:10:05,559 --> 00:10:09,920 Speaker 1: people like Robert Mercer have employed daffs as a way 175 00:10:10,200 --> 00:10:14,160 Speaker 1: of meeting their required giving from their private foundations, but 176 00:10:14,280 --> 00:10:17,080 Speaker 1: also on some level of securing what they're doing with 177 00:10:17,120 --> 00:10:21,280 Speaker 1: their these philanthropic dollars. Well, let's use Elon Musk as 178 00:10:21,280 --> 00:10:23,760 Speaker 1: an example. He's in the news everywhere, so might as 179 00:10:23,760 --> 00:10:27,319 Speaker 1: well talk about him. Amore, How has he used these 180 00:10:27,360 --> 00:10:31,160 Speaker 1: donor advised funds? Yeah, So what you see when you 181 00:10:31,200 --> 00:10:33,920 Speaker 1: look at the tax filings for the Musk Foundation, which 182 00:10:34,080 --> 00:10:35,960 Speaker 1: you can get from the I R S or from 183 00:10:35,960 --> 00:10:38,200 Speaker 1: his his folks, is he has something. Sophie correct me 184 00:10:38,200 --> 00:10:40,880 Speaker 1: if I'm wrong, but about three billion dollars amassed in 185 00:10:40,920 --> 00:10:43,600 Speaker 1: the Musk Foundation. It's probably down quite a bit because 186 00:10:43,600 --> 00:10:46,040 Speaker 1: of Tesla, but yes, and if you look over the 187 00:10:46,080 --> 00:10:50,160 Speaker 1: past several years, about three quarters of the money that 188 00:10:50,320 --> 00:10:53,280 Speaker 1: the foundation has given out has ended up at two 189 00:10:53,440 --> 00:10:56,240 Speaker 1: sponsors of donor advised fund the one that was set 190 00:10:56,320 --> 00:10:58,240 Speaker 1: up by Vanguard and the one that was set up 191 00:10:58,280 --> 00:11:01,840 Speaker 1: by Fidelity and one the money makes it to those dats, 192 00:11:02,120 --> 00:11:06,360 Speaker 1: we really have very very little idea whether it's even 193 00:11:06,400 --> 00:11:09,680 Speaker 1: going onto a working charity and what it's doing from there. 194 00:11:09,760 --> 00:11:12,520 Speaker 1: It's it's sort of a black box. That's what I 195 00:11:12,559 --> 00:11:15,000 Speaker 1: think critics of daff's would point out as one of 196 00:11:15,000 --> 00:11:17,640 Speaker 1: the big issues with these funds. And you know, the 197 00:11:17,720 --> 00:11:21,760 Speaker 1: little that we do know about Musk's giving has come 198 00:11:21,840 --> 00:11:26,599 Speaker 1: up in really weird forums. We know from the defamation 199 00:11:26,679 --> 00:11:30,840 Speaker 1: trial between Amber Heard and Johnny Depp that at least 200 00:11:30,920 --> 00:11:34,160 Speaker 1: some of the money that Musk put into his Vanguard 201 00:11:34,240 --> 00:11:36,439 Speaker 1: DAFF had made its way to the a c l 202 00:11:36,559 --> 00:11:40,160 Speaker 1: U but that was only because Musk had been dating 203 00:11:40,320 --> 00:11:44,760 Speaker 1: Amber Heard and during the trial the representative for the 204 00:11:44,760 --> 00:11:47,679 Speaker 1: a c l U was on the stand and they 205 00:11:47,679 --> 00:11:51,520 Speaker 1: were trying to figure out whether a pledged donation had 206 00:11:51,559 --> 00:11:53,880 Speaker 1: actually made its way from Amber Heard to the a 207 00:11:54,000 --> 00:11:55,840 Speaker 1: C l U, and it came out that some of 208 00:11:55,840 --> 00:11:58,800 Speaker 1: that money came from Musk's Vanguard DAFF. I mean, that's 209 00:11:58,800 --> 00:12:01,600 Speaker 1: a very conval did story to try and figure out 210 00:12:01,679 --> 00:12:05,360 Speaker 1: where one of the world's richest people is spreading his 211 00:12:05,640 --> 00:12:09,960 Speaker 1: charitable dollars, and and that's a consequence of this black 212 00:12:10,000 --> 00:12:14,160 Speaker 1: box structure that he's employing to give away money. I 213 00:12:14,280 --> 00:12:17,280 Speaker 1: just really quickly want to add on Elon Musk. You know, 214 00:12:17,360 --> 00:12:21,120 Speaker 1: we can't guess what his intentions are with setting up 215 00:12:21,120 --> 00:12:24,280 Speaker 1: a private foundation that gives most of its money to 216 00:12:24,320 --> 00:12:27,280 Speaker 1: a donor advised fund, but in talking to you know, 217 00:12:27,360 --> 00:12:30,320 Speaker 1: people who do research in this space, it seems like 218 00:12:30,440 --> 00:12:32,760 Speaker 1: one of the reasons that we see this happening over 219 00:12:32,800 --> 00:12:35,520 Speaker 1: and over again is that someone like Elon Musk sets 220 00:12:35,600 --> 00:12:38,880 Speaker 1: up a foundation twenty years ago, he you know, may 221 00:12:39,000 --> 00:12:42,360 Speaker 1: have some philanthropic intentions, doesn't really know exactly what he 222 00:12:42,400 --> 00:12:45,120 Speaker 1: wants to do yet, and then he becomes really busy 223 00:12:45,280 --> 00:12:48,520 Speaker 1: running several companies and he doesn't have the time to 224 00:12:48,679 --> 00:12:52,120 Speaker 1: actually commit himself to philanthropy. So in the meantime, that 225 00:12:52,160 --> 00:12:54,400 Speaker 1: money can make its way to a DAFF and then 226 00:12:54,440 --> 00:12:56,840 Speaker 1: something that we've also talked about in the story is 227 00:12:56,880 --> 00:12:59,400 Speaker 1: that as that money piles up in a daff people 228 00:12:59,440 --> 00:13:02,719 Speaker 1: sort of become paralyzed and it might just sit there 229 00:13:02,760 --> 00:13:04,600 Speaker 1: longer and longer the more you have in it, because 230 00:13:04,640 --> 00:13:06,400 Speaker 1: it's like, oh my God, look at all this money 231 00:13:06,440 --> 00:13:10,440 Speaker 1: that I have to spend down. My conversation with Sophie, 232 00:13:10,520 --> 00:13:20,960 Speaker 1: Ben and Noah continues after the break. So there's Ellen Musk. 233 00:13:21,000 --> 00:13:25,640 Speaker 1: Who's another person who uses these funds. Yeah. Another one 234 00:13:25,960 --> 00:13:29,480 Speaker 1: we looked at was Robert Mercer, the former co CEO 235 00:13:29,600 --> 00:13:33,800 Speaker 1: of Renaissance Technologies and prolific donor to Republican causes. He 236 00:13:34,160 --> 00:13:37,480 Speaker 1: and his family attracted a lot of scrutiny after Donald 237 00:13:37,520 --> 00:13:41,120 Speaker 1: Trump was elected for where their charitable dollars were going 238 00:13:41,160 --> 00:13:44,080 Speaker 1: from the Mercer Family Foundation, and what you see in 239 00:13:44,120 --> 00:13:47,040 Speaker 1: the tax filings is that, I believe it was two 240 00:13:47,120 --> 00:13:50,480 Speaker 1: thousand and eighteen they started giving the lion share of 241 00:13:50,520 --> 00:13:54,360 Speaker 1: their money to a daft sponsor called Donors Trust. They 242 00:13:54,360 --> 00:13:58,760 Speaker 1: called themselves the Community Foundation for Liberty. They've attracted some 243 00:13:58,840 --> 00:14:03,640 Speaker 1: people with moreservative ideas, and you basically ended up in 244 00:14:03,679 --> 00:14:06,400 Speaker 1: a situation where the Mercer Family Foundation, which had been 245 00:14:06,400 --> 00:14:09,560 Speaker 1: getting all this scrutiny for these donations they were making 246 00:14:09,559 --> 00:14:12,800 Speaker 1: out of their private foundation. Suddenly, you know, we just 247 00:14:12,880 --> 00:14:15,839 Speaker 1: don't know where the money is going because the bulk 248 00:14:15,880 --> 00:14:18,079 Speaker 1: of it ends up at donor's trust, and then it's 249 00:14:18,120 --> 00:14:20,200 Speaker 1: hard to tell once it ends up at donor's trust 250 00:14:20,600 --> 00:14:24,280 Speaker 1: where or whether the mercers are giving out that money. 251 00:14:24,720 --> 00:14:28,720 Speaker 1: So it's not just that you don't know necessarily when 252 00:14:28,760 --> 00:14:30,920 Speaker 1: they're giving it out, just trying to find out where 253 00:14:30,920 --> 00:14:34,000 Speaker 1: it ultimately goes and whether it's really going to charity, 254 00:14:34,080 --> 00:14:37,080 Speaker 1: if they ever found instances where money was dispersed to 255 00:14:37,480 --> 00:14:40,880 Speaker 1: places where it shouldn't have been the problem is that 256 00:14:41,320 --> 00:14:44,400 Speaker 1: when you give to a Fidelity staff, your money is 257 00:14:44,480 --> 00:14:48,480 Speaker 1: for public reporting purposes, is commingled with all the other donors. 258 00:14:48,560 --> 00:14:50,960 Speaker 1: It's like a giant pool of fifty billion dollars at 259 00:14:50,960 --> 00:14:53,960 Speaker 1: this point, you just can't tell. So you had mentioned 260 00:14:53,960 --> 00:14:58,000 Speaker 1: earlier that Fidelity other financial institutions has set up these 261 00:14:58,040 --> 00:15:00,440 Speaker 1: funds have an incentive to keep it there. How do 262 00:15:00,520 --> 00:15:02,400 Speaker 1: they make money off of the money that's sitting in 263 00:15:02,440 --> 00:15:05,880 Speaker 1: these funds. They're basically two sources of revenue coming in 264 00:15:05,920 --> 00:15:08,480 Speaker 1: the door. You've got investment fees. So a lot of 265 00:15:08,480 --> 00:15:13,400 Speaker 1: times the donor advice funds sponsor the Fidelity or Vanguard 266 00:15:13,480 --> 00:15:17,040 Speaker 1: or Schwab, they will help you allocate the money and 267 00:15:17,120 --> 00:15:21,240 Speaker 1: your DAFF to mutual funds or various other investment products 268 00:15:21,240 --> 00:15:24,280 Speaker 1: that they earn investment fees on the big sponsors. They 269 00:15:24,280 --> 00:15:26,800 Speaker 1: tend to be pretty low cost things. But you know, 270 00:15:26,800 --> 00:15:29,600 Speaker 1: we're talking about hundreds of billions and dollars of assets 271 00:15:29,600 --> 00:15:32,440 Speaker 1: spread across daffs at this point, so it's real money. 272 00:15:32,600 --> 00:15:35,560 Speaker 1: The other source of revenue for the daft sponsors are 273 00:15:35,680 --> 00:15:39,680 Speaker 1: administrative fees, and this is basically the cost of running 274 00:15:39,880 --> 00:15:43,160 Speaker 1: the entity, the charitable entity that that houses all the daffs. 275 00:15:43,320 --> 00:15:45,880 Speaker 1: So they charged essentially management fee the way they would 276 00:15:45,880 --> 00:15:49,320 Speaker 1: for other kinds of funds. Correct and again for the 277 00:15:49,440 --> 00:15:53,400 Speaker 1: big national sponsors like Fidelity and Vanguard and Schwab, these 278 00:15:53,400 --> 00:15:57,160 Speaker 1: tend to be relatively low. It's part of the reason 279 00:15:57,560 --> 00:16:01,720 Speaker 1: that daffs are so popular because these financial services firms 280 00:16:01,720 --> 00:16:05,400 Speaker 1: have really made it cost effective for people to set 281 00:16:05,440 --> 00:16:08,440 Speaker 1: these things up. The benefit for the financial services firms 282 00:16:08,480 --> 00:16:11,040 Speaker 1: as they've aggregated so many dollars at this point that 283 00:16:11,120 --> 00:16:14,800 Speaker 1: it's real money. Now. If you talk with the big sponsors, 284 00:16:14,840 --> 00:16:19,440 Speaker 1: they'll say that they're offering these services at cost, or 285 00:16:19,520 --> 00:16:21,880 Speaker 1: at least what you would have to pay to get 286 00:16:21,920 --> 00:16:24,520 Speaker 1: these services in the private market. And I will just 287 00:16:24,600 --> 00:16:27,440 Speaker 1: add here like for some people, you know, if you 288 00:16:27,480 --> 00:16:30,120 Speaker 1: had a smaller amount of money to give away, setting 289 00:16:30,200 --> 00:16:33,800 Speaker 1: up and administering a private foundation is not free. So 290 00:16:34,000 --> 00:16:38,680 Speaker 1: for certain size wealth, if you use a DAFT as intended, 291 00:16:38,760 --> 00:16:42,280 Speaker 1: and you're distributing your money regularly, a dat can actually 292 00:16:42,360 --> 00:16:45,520 Speaker 1: be a more cost effective way to give I was 293 00:16:45,560 --> 00:16:47,800 Speaker 1: just gonna add it on top of the fees that 294 00:16:47,840 --> 00:16:51,720 Speaker 1: they're actually collecting. It's also a really good relationship building tool. 295 00:16:51,800 --> 00:16:53,760 Speaker 1: When you're setting up a donor advise fund with a 296 00:16:53,800 --> 00:16:56,680 Speaker 1: place for like Fidelity, you now have a relationship with 297 00:16:56,680 --> 00:16:59,760 Speaker 1: that financial institution and they can leverage that. Like financial 298 00:16:59,800 --> 00:17:03,560 Speaker 1: advisors are obsessed with the next generation because often they're 299 00:17:03,680 --> 00:17:06,520 Speaker 1: working with the patriarch and matriarch of a family who 300 00:17:06,520 --> 00:17:08,719 Speaker 1: are aging, and they want to make sure that they 301 00:17:08,720 --> 00:17:11,040 Speaker 1: have a good relationship with the next generation and the 302 00:17:11,080 --> 00:17:15,000 Speaker 1: grandkids as well. And philanthropy becomes part of that strategy, 303 00:17:15,040 --> 00:17:17,720 Speaker 1: and there's a lot of discussion about that among the advisors. 304 00:17:21,800 --> 00:17:24,920 Speaker 1: So if I'm a billionaire and I want to meet 305 00:17:24,960 --> 00:17:27,440 Speaker 1: the requirements of giving away the money from my foundation. 306 00:17:27,560 --> 00:17:31,160 Speaker 1: Is there anything I'm gaining other than meeting that requirement 307 00:17:31,160 --> 00:17:33,439 Speaker 1: and not having to give that money away immediately? Are 308 00:17:33,480 --> 00:17:36,520 Speaker 1: their tax benefits for giving it to a donor advice 309 00:17:36,600 --> 00:17:40,960 Speaker 1: fund as opposed to just dispersing it. Basically, the main 310 00:17:41,080 --> 00:17:45,080 Speaker 1: motives are either you don't want to disclose what you're doing, 311 00:17:45,400 --> 00:17:47,640 Speaker 1: or you don't have a plan for what you're doing. 312 00:17:48,440 --> 00:17:52,040 Speaker 1: So once you put your money in the donor advice fund, 313 00:17:52,160 --> 00:17:54,280 Speaker 1: can you ever pull it out? Or is it in 314 00:17:54,320 --> 00:17:57,240 Speaker 1: there for good? No, it's in there for good. You 315 00:17:57,240 --> 00:18:00,479 Speaker 1: can't take it back. Ben, Are we seeing any movement 316 00:18:00,560 --> 00:18:03,120 Speaker 1: at all in Congress by the I R S other 317 00:18:03,200 --> 00:18:07,480 Speaker 1: agencies that oversee financial institutions to maybe get a little 318 00:18:07,480 --> 00:18:09,960 Speaker 1: more transparency about how this money is being spent or 319 00:18:10,160 --> 00:18:14,560 Speaker 1: not spent. A couple of years ago, a coalition kind 320 00:18:14,560 --> 00:18:18,560 Speaker 1: of an odd coalition of billionaires and academics came together 321 00:18:19,000 --> 00:18:23,920 Speaker 1: and proposed a law that would end this practice. Their 322 00:18:23,920 --> 00:18:26,880 Speaker 1: idea was, let's accelerate charitable giving by putting some new 323 00:18:26,960 --> 00:18:29,600 Speaker 1: rules on the on these things. And that was actually 324 00:18:29,600 --> 00:18:33,720 Speaker 1: taken up by Charles Grassley, the Iowa Republican Senator and 325 00:18:34,000 --> 00:18:37,440 Speaker 1: Angus King, a senator from Maine who is an independent 326 00:18:37,480 --> 00:18:40,240 Speaker 1: but caucuses with Democrats, and they proposed the law that 327 00:18:40,320 --> 00:18:43,080 Speaker 1: was introduced in the House as well, and it would 328 00:18:43,080 --> 00:18:46,920 Speaker 1: basically mean that if you put money in a DAFF 329 00:18:47,119 --> 00:18:50,919 Speaker 1: and got an upfront tax break, you would have fifteen 330 00:18:51,000 --> 00:18:55,240 Speaker 1: years to distribute that money. And that law has sort 331 00:18:55,280 --> 00:18:58,280 Speaker 1: of been sitting in the past Congress, uh and not 332 00:18:58,400 --> 00:19:01,720 Speaker 1: going very far. It did spark a lot of pushback 333 00:19:01,840 --> 00:19:05,760 Speaker 1: from the daft industry, from community foundations that offer these 334 00:19:05,960 --> 00:19:10,639 Speaker 1: dafts as well, And we'll see what happens next. The 335 00:19:10,680 --> 00:19:14,640 Speaker 1: Biden administration has also proposed a rule change that would 336 00:19:14,680 --> 00:19:17,680 Speaker 1: prevent foundations from using daffs in the way that we've 337 00:19:17,720 --> 00:19:21,800 Speaker 1: been talking about. Ultimately, the comprehensive solution is a law, 338 00:19:21,920 --> 00:19:24,000 Speaker 1: but the I R s could maybe tweak the rules 339 00:19:24,000 --> 00:19:31,040 Speaker 1: a little bit and change disclosure rules a little bit. No, 340 00:19:31,400 --> 00:19:33,800 Speaker 1: when you look down the road, where do you see 341 00:19:33,800 --> 00:19:36,320 Speaker 1: this going? Do you think that just billions and billions 342 00:19:36,320 --> 00:19:39,119 Speaker 1: more dollars that can keep piling up in these funds 343 00:19:39,320 --> 00:19:41,119 Speaker 1: or at some point the damn is going to bust 344 00:19:41,119 --> 00:19:43,760 Speaker 1: and that money is going to be called upon to 345 00:19:43,920 --> 00:19:46,280 Speaker 1: be released. Well, I mean, if you look at the 346 00:19:46,400 --> 00:19:49,280 Speaker 1: data The trend is definitely for more and more money 347 00:19:49,320 --> 00:19:52,679 Speaker 1: to pile up. When we published our first story on this, 348 00:19:52,880 --> 00:19:54,919 Speaker 1: it was I think it was a hundred and sixty 349 00:19:54,960 --> 00:19:58,439 Speaker 1: billion dollars across all dafts in the US, and that 350 00:19:58,480 --> 00:20:03,400 Speaker 1: climbed at two and thirty rebellion. For a lot of donors, 351 00:20:03,560 --> 00:20:08,600 Speaker 1: it's just a very very convenient structure to organize their giving. 352 00:20:09,000 --> 00:20:12,000 Speaker 1: But yeah, overall, I think the trend very much is 353 00:20:12,040 --> 00:20:14,679 Speaker 1: that we're going to see ever greater sums go into daffs. 354 00:20:15,359 --> 00:20:18,560 Speaker 1: Noah bu Hire, Sophia Alexander, Ben, Steve Berman, thanks so 355 00:20:18,600 --> 00:20:20,800 Speaker 1: much for talking to me, Thanks for having us, Thanks, 356 00:20:21,160 --> 00:20:24,040 Speaker 1: thank you when we come back. What does all this 357 00:20:24,200 --> 00:20:28,760 Speaker 1: stockpiled cash mean for the charities who are waiting for it? 358 00:20:34,720 --> 00:20:37,720 Speaker 1: A lot of charities and nonprofits of all kinds depend 359 00:20:37,800 --> 00:20:41,240 Speaker 1: to one degree or another on contributions, So what does 360 00:20:41,280 --> 00:20:44,160 Speaker 1: the rise of donor advised funds mean for the people 361 00:20:44,200 --> 00:20:48,119 Speaker 1: on the receiving end. One person who definitely knows is 362 00:20:48,240 --> 00:20:52,800 Speaker 1: jan massa Oka. She's the CEO of the California Association 363 00:20:53,000 --> 00:20:56,320 Speaker 1: of Nonprofits and she joins me now from San Francisco. 364 00:20:56,840 --> 00:20:59,480 Speaker 1: Jan massa Oka, thanks so much for talking to me today. 365 00:20:59,480 --> 00:21:02,680 Speaker 1: Thank you, Jim. Can you tell me first, what does 366 00:21:02,720 --> 00:21:08,720 Speaker 1: the California Association of Nonprofits do well? Count nonprofits? We say, 367 00:21:08,760 --> 00:21:12,320 Speaker 1: for short, is a chamber of commerce for nonprofit organizations 368 00:21:12,800 --> 00:21:17,280 Speaker 1: in California. There are ninety two thousand registered nonprofit organizations, 369 00:21:17,280 --> 00:21:20,440 Speaker 1: but two thirds of them are all volunteer organizations, so 370 00:21:20,720 --> 00:21:22,760 Speaker 1: there are twenty two thousand with staff. But we have 371 00:21:22,960 --> 00:21:26,320 Speaker 1: just under ten thousand members, including both all volunteer and 372 00:21:26,359 --> 00:21:30,399 Speaker 1: staffed organizations. So we take on regulatory, economic issues, the 373 00:21:30,480 --> 00:21:33,080 Speaker 1: kinds of things that affect all nonprofits, just not one 374 00:21:33,119 --> 00:21:36,800 Speaker 1: segment of them. And what kind of nonprofits does your 375 00:21:36,920 --> 00:21:41,080 Speaker 1: organization represent well? We like to say we represent as 376 00:21:41,119 --> 00:21:43,440 Speaker 1: many as can or as many kinds. I would say 377 00:21:43,440 --> 00:21:45,760 Speaker 1: that kind of the best part of our membership our 378 00:21:45,840 --> 00:21:49,080 Speaker 1: health and human service organizations that are community based, in 379 00:21:49,160 --> 00:21:55,480 Speaker 1: community oriented. We certainly have a large number of foundations, schools, universities, etcetera, 380 00:21:56,080 --> 00:21:59,199 Speaker 1: arts organizations, theaters, but I would say kind of the 381 00:21:59,240 --> 00:22:01,440 Speaker 1: heart of our member ship with the community based health 382 00:22:01,480 --> 00:22:06,320 Speaker 1: and human services. And so I imagine a lot of 383 00:22:06,320 --> 00:22:11,760 Speaker 1: your members depend to one degree or another on philanthropic contributions. Well, 384 00:22:11,760 --> 00:22:14,000 Speaker 1: you know, it's interesting if you look at the total 385 00:22:14,160 --> 00:22:18,439 Speaker 1: income of California's nonprofit community, less than five percent of 386 00:22:18,480 --> 00:22:21,919 Speaker 1: it comes from foundations and individuals, so they get a 387 00:22:21,960 --> 00:22:24,520 Speaker 1: lot of attention, but it's not where most of our 388 00:22:24,560 --> 00:22:28,240 Speaker 1: money comes from. Actually, we're talking today a lot about 389 00:22:28,320 --> 00:22:32,280 Speaker 1: donor advised funds and the effect that these funds have 390 00:22:32,440 --> 00:22:38,080 Speaker 1: had on how much money is actually going from different philanthropies, 391 00:22:38,440 --> 00:22:44,720 Speaker 1: different organizations into charitable organizations and nonprofits. Have you seen 392 00:22:44,800 --> 00:22:48,359 Speaker 1: an effect from the rise in the use of these 393 00:22:48,400 --> 00:22:51,080 Speaker 1: donor advised funds in the amount of money that's just 394 00:22:51,400 --> 00:22:54,760 Speaker 1: flowing out. Well, let me tell you a story that 395 00:22:54,840 --> 00:22:57,320 Speaker 1: tells you a little bit about why this issue is 396 00:22:57,400 --> 00:23:00,960 Speaker 1: such an emotional important one to our First one of 397 00:23:01,000 --> 00:23:03,919 Speaker 1: our members is an African American woman who learned the 398 00:23:03,960 --> 00:23:06,600 Speaker 1: hard way that when you get released from prison, you 399 00:23:06,640 --> 00:23:09,600 Speaker 1: can't get your children back until you have a permanent address. 400 00:23:10,119 --> 00:23:12,119 Speaker 1: And of course, if you are such a woman, you 401 00:23:12,160 --> 00:23:14,480 Speaker 1: feel like you can't really do anything until you have 402 00:23:14,560 --> 00:23:18,080 Speaker 1: your children back. So, after she got her life back together, 403 00:23:18,160 --> 00:23:21,040 Speaker 1: she started a nonprofit to help women have a permanent 404 00:23:21,040 --> 00:23:23,439 Speaker 1: address so that they can be housed for a period 405 00:23:23,480 --> 00:23:25,800 Speaker 1: of time so that they can get their children back 406 00:23:25,840 --> 00:23:29,119 Speaker 1: as soon as possible, and over the last twenty years 407 00:23:29,119 --> 00:23:31,840 Speaker 1: she scraped and saved and worked hard so that she 408 00:23:31,880 --> 00:23:35,040 Speaker 1: now has two shelters that have women and children able 409 00:23:35,080 --> 00:23:38,680 Speaker 1: to stay there. She told me that within fifty miles 410 00:23:38,880 --> 00:23:41,920 Speaker 1: of her there are two organizations that have more than 411 00:23:41,960 --> 00:23:46,280 Speaker 1: one billion dollars in donor advice fund assets. But there's 412 00:23:46,320 --> 00:23:49,320 Speaker 1: no access to any of those donor advice funds, and 413 00:23:49,400 --> 00:23:52,240 Speaker 1: so there might as well be as well spargo. They're 414 00:23:52,280 --> 00:23:54,480 Speaker 1: held up in the checking accounts, and so she has 415 00:23:54,520 --> 00:23:58,000 Speaker 1: no access to them, and it's infuriating. Frankly, if you 416 00:23:58,040 --> 00:24:01,280 Speaker 1: were in that kind of situation and these big amounts 417 00:24:01,280 --> 00:24:05,000 Speaker 1: of foundation dollars for which people have gotten tax deductions 418 00:24:05,000 --> 00:24:07,840 Speaker 1: were three thousand miles away, you might not feel it 419 00:24:07,880 --> 00:24:10,240 Speaker 1: as keenly as you do when they're right next door 420 00:24:10,280 --> 00:24:13,119 Speaker 1: to you. We also know that the Attorney General of 421 00:24:13,160 --> 00:24:16,760 Speaker 1: California has released a very important report showing more about 422 00:24:16,760 --> 00:24:19,240 Speaker 1: donor advice funds, and one of the things that points 423 00:24:19,240 --> 00:24:23,280 Speaker 1: out is that giving overall is actually very flat. We're 424 00:24:23,359 --> 00:24:26,200 Speaker 1: not seeing increases in giving in the last several years, 425 00:24:26,560 --> 00:24:28,920 Speaker 1: but the amount of money that goes to donor advised 426 00:24:29,000 --> 00:24:31,919 Speaker 1: funds is now over ten percent of total giving, So 427 00:24:32,000 --> 00:24:35,160 Speaker 1: that means that there's actually less money that's going directly 428 00:24:35,200 --> 00:24:42,200 Speaker 1: to nonprofits that are operational, and how has that affected 429 00:24:42,280 --> 00:24:46,520 Speaker 1: the ability of nonprofits to function well? For some nonprofits 430 00:24:46,520 --> 00:24:50,200 Speaker 1: it's the majority of the even of their funding, but overall, 431 00:24:50,560 --> 00:24:54,680 Speaker 1: colanthropic dollars are under five of nonprofit income. I think 432 00:24:54,720 --> 00:24:57,399 Speaker 1: that one of the things that we've seen happen is 433 00:24:57,480 --> 00:25:00,119 Speaker 1: that for a long time, the way that individual well 434 00:25:00,200 --> 00:25:02,879 Speaker 1: giving has worked for nonprofits is that you have small 435 00:25:02,960 --> 00:25:05,400 Speaker 1: donors and you gradually work with them so that they 436 00:25:05,440 --> 00:25:08,440 Speaker 1: increase their giving over time. And what we're seeing right 437 00:25:08,440 --> 00:25:11,480 Speaker 1: now where I've heard from so many nonprofit fundraising directors, 438 00:25:12,320 --> 00:25:15,560 Speaker 1: is that they've lost their middle class of donors. Right 439 00:25:15,600 --> 00:25:17,879 Speaker 1: They've got still got the small donors that are giving 440 00:25:17,880 --> 00:25:20,879 Speaker 1: ten fifteen dollars, and they have mega donors now that 441 00:25:20,960 --> 00:25:23,520 Speaker 1: might be giving a million dollars or two million dollars, 442 00:25:23,520 --> 00:25:26,479 Speaker 1: but they've lost their middle set of donors. I believe 443 00:25:26,560 --> 00:25:28,520 Speaker 1: that part of this is kind of the shrinking of 444 00:25:28,520 --> 00:25:32,080 Speaker 1: the American middle class in general, but it's also really 445 00:25:32,080 --> 00:25:35,560 Speaker 1: an indication I think of how it's turning nonprofit attention 446 00:25:35,640 --> 00:25:39,199 Speaker 1: in general to seeking donations from mega donors. And not 447 00:25:39,320 --> 00:25:42,359 Speaker 1: from the main streams of the communities in which they're embedded. 448 00:25:43,119 --> 00:25:47,959 Speaker 1: What kind of nonprofits are most affected by fewer dollars 449 00:25:48,000 --> 00:25:51,000 Speaker 1: coming out of the donor advice funds that once may 450 00:25:51,080 --> 00:25:55,480 Speaker 1: have flowed into their coffers. They depends on what you 451 00:25:55,520 --> 00:25:58,199 Speaker 1: mean by affected. I think that you know because foundations 452 00:25:58,200 --> 00:26:00,959 Speaker 1: are the majority of funding, for example, and think tanks. 453 00:26:01,440 --> 00:26:04,160 Speaker 1: Think tanks are less likely to get some of that money. 454 00:26:04,200 --> 00:26:06,840 Speaker 1: But I think that where people feel it the most 455 00:26:06,920 --> 00:26:09,880 Speaker 1: is people that are working with vulnerable communities. When you're 456 00:26:09,880 --> 00:26:13,280 Speaker 1: working with children with disabilities, you know, elder people that 457 00:26:13,320 --> 00:26:16,639 Speaker 1: are in crisis. These kinds of people really feel it 458 00:26:16,720 --> 00:26:18,919 Speaker 1: in their guts and their hearts when they don't have 459 00:26:18,960 --> 00:26:21,200 Speaker 1: as much money as they need to to be able 460 00:26:21,240 --> 00:26:23,960 Speaker 1: to serve those kinds of people. Do you see any 461 00:26:24,080 --> 00:26:26,840 Speaker 1: upside to donor advice funds? There's anything good about them 462 00:26:26,880 --> 00:26:31,440 Speaker 1: from your perspective? Well, we yes, we support the idea 463 00:26:31,480 --> 00:26:33,920 Speaker 1: of donor advice funds. The core idea of a donor 464 00:26:33,960 --> 00:26:36,240 Speaker 1: advice fund is that I could put let's say ten 465 00:26:36,240 --> 00:26:39,439 Speaker 1: million dollars into a donor advice fund today and I 466 00:26:39,480 --> 00:26:42,400 Speaker 1: could get a tax break immediately, but I will only 467 00:26:42,440 --> 00:26:45,240 Speaker 1: have to give away that money to an active nonprofit 468 00:26:45,359 --> 00:26:48,480 Speaker 1: sometime between now and infinity. So we think if people 469 00:26:48,520 --> 00:26:51,280 Speaker 1: are doing it relatively quickly, that's a good idea, but 470 00:26:51,359 --> 00:26:53,359 Speaker 1: we think there should be a legal limit that's a 471 00:26:53,400 --> 00:26:57,399 Speaker 1: little bit closer than infinity. Our number one concern is 472 00:26:57,440 --> 00:27:03,080 Speaker 1: about transparency, because we can't identify these problems given how secretive, 473 00:27:03,359 --> 00:27:06,120 Speaker 1: it's just a wrap of secrecy around them. And that's 474 00:27:06,160 --> 00:27:08,879 Speaker 1: one of the reasons we have co sponsored legislation in 475 00:27:08,920 --> 00:27:12,639 Speaker 1: California to bring some transparency to these issues. We know 476 00:27:12,800 --> 00:27:15,800 Speaker 1: most owner advised funds people are great. They mean, well, 477 00:27:16,160 --> 00:27:18,160 Speaker 1: they want to put off the giving till next year 478 00:27:18,240 --> 00:27:19,840 Speaker 1: when they have a little bit more time to think 479 00:27:19,840 --> 00:27:23,760 Speaker 1: about it, for example. But we also feel like, well, 480 00:27:23,800 --> 00:27:27,040 Speaker 1: just because almost nobody murders anybody, it doesn't mean we 481 00:27:27,040 --> 00:27:32,160 Speaker 1: shouldn't have laws against murder. You mentioned a bill that 482 00:27:32,200 --> 00:27:35,080 Speaker 1: you are pressing to have passed. What exactly would it 483 00:27:35,119 --> 00:27:39,160 Speaker 1: do well, right now, we're in between legislative sessions, so 484 00:27:39,600 --> 00:27:41,720 Speaker 1: we don't have a bill right now, but we're expecting 485 00:27:41,720 --> 00:27:44,880 Speaker 1: to in January. We're working with Assembly Member Buffy Wicks, 486 00:27:44,920 --> 00:27:48,160 Speaker 1: who's very committed to this issue and very concerned about 487 00:27:48,160 --> 00:27:50,560 Speaker 1: seeing that people in her district are getting the funds 488 00:27:50,600 --> 00:27:54,359 Speaker 1: that they need. Jan Mos Okay, thanks so much for 489 00:27:54,520 --> 00:27:57,880 Speaker 1: taking the time to talk to me today. Thank you. 490 00:27:57,880 --> 00:28:00,000 Speaker 1: You can read the story no A Boo Hire, Sophie 491 00:28:00,000 --> 00:28:03,200 Speaker 1: Alexander and Ben Steve Berman wrote about Toner advice funds. 492 00:28:03,600 --> 00:28:06,680 Speaker 1: I'm Bloomberg dot com. Thanks for listening to us here 493 00:28:06,760 --> 00:28:10,199 Speaker 1: at The Big Take. It's the daily podcast from Bloomberg 494 00:28:10,359 --> 00:28:13,960 Speaker 1: and I Heart Radio. For more shows from my Heart Radio, 495 00:28:14,280 --> 00:28:18,680 Speaker 1: visit the I Heart Radio app podcast or wherever you listen. 496 00:28:19,320 --> 00:28:22,800 Speaker 1: Read today's story and subscribe to our daily newsletter at 497 00:28:22,880 --> 00:28:26,879 Speaker 1: Bloomberg dot com. Slash Big Take, and we'd love to 498 00:28:26,920 --> 00:28:30,520 Speaker 1: hear from you. Email us with questions or comments to 499 00:28:30,680 --> 00:28:35,080 Speaker 1: Big Take at Bloomberg dot net. The supervising producer of 500 00:28:35,119 --> 00:28:38,440 Speaker 1: The Big Take is Vicky Burgalina. Our senior producer is 501 00:28:38,560 --> 00:28:43,240 Speaker 1: Katherine Fink. Our producer is Rebecca Chasson. Our associate producer 502 00:28:43,360 --> 00:28:48,480 Speaker 1: is Sam Gobauer. Raphael M. Seelee is our engineer. Original 503 00:28:48,560 --> 00:28:53,040 Speaker 1: music by Leo Sidrin. I'm west Kasova. We'll be back 504 00:28:53,080 --> 00:29:01,840 Speaker 1: tomorrow with another Big Take down the broad to burn 505 00:29:01,960 --> 00:29:03,600 Speaker 1: the Ball Tottle Bar