WEBVTT - Beating The Book: 2019 NFL MegaPod Week 15 Preview

0:00:03.400 --> 0:00:13.360
<v Speaker 1>Check it on Man No Down Man Thursday morning, December twelve, nineteen,

0:00:13.800 --> 0:00:16.720
<v Speaker 1>Reading of the book podcast It's the Megapod for a

0:00:16.840 --> 0:00:21.000
<v Speaker 1>week number fifteen in the National Football League MAN regular

0:00:21.040 --> 0:00:24.599
<v Speaker 1>season winding down. As always, we got a rotating guest

0:00:24.640 --> 0:00:27.320
<v Speaker 1>coming up. But first our staples on my right from

0:00:27.320 --> 0:00:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Circuits Sports, Derek Stephen's conciliary, also the vice president of operations,

0:00:30.920 --> 0:00:34.400
<v Speaker 1>most importantly at Circuits Sports building the Big Shangri La

0:00:34.600 --> 0:00:38.360
<v Speaker 1>Sports book, destined to be open December at the new

0:00:38.400 --> 0:00:42.280
<v Speaker 1>Circuit Casino. It's Michael Palm. Hello, Michael, good morning. We're

0:00:42.280 --> 0:00:45.640
<v Speaker 1>halfway there, as Derek did his press event on Monday,

0:00:46.040 --> 0:00:51.360
<v Speaker 1>just one year out from Circle Wow. On schedule, on schedule,

0:00:51.560 --> 0:00:54.480
<v Speaker 1>on budget, on schedule. When do you expect the contractor

0:00:54.520 --> 0:00:56.600
<v Speaker 1>to be like, we can't get it in December twenty.

0:00:56.800 --> 0:00:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Is that gonna happen? Well, they have. They have a

0:01:00.080 --> 0:01:03.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of incentives not only to get it done on time,

0:01:03.120 --> 0:01:05.000
<v Speaker 1>but incentives to get it done early. So I think

0:01:05.040 --> 0:01:07.680
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna happen. Okay, alright, And on my left, uh,

0:01:07.760 --> 0:01:09.479
<v Speaker 1>the one of the stars I shouldn't say these star,

0:01:09.640 --> 0:01:12.720
<v Speaker 1>but one of the stars of show times. Uh. Four

0:01:12.840 --> 0:01:18.080
<v Speaker 1>Part docuseries, Action Ladies and gentlemen. Everybody's lovable South Point resident.

0:01:18.360 --> 0:01:22.080
<v Speaker 1>It's Todd Wishing. Hello Toddy. Hi, Dr Alexander. How are you.

0:01:22.280 --> 0:01:24.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm doing very well. Um. You know, if you give

0:01:24.520 --> 0:01:26.920
<v Speaker 1>me fourteen weeks of football, I will get you a

0:01:26.920 --> 0:01:30.000
<v Speaker 1>clean sheet. That's what I did last week. Fourteen weeks.

0:01:30.000 --> 0:01:31.600
<v Speaker 1>I promise you I will do it for it. It's

0:01:31.640 --> 0:01:33.920
<v Speaker 1>all it took for me. And our guest today is

0:01:34.120 --> 0:01:36.320
<v Speaker 1>back for the second time this year. He's always the

0:01:36.400 --> 0:01:38.760
<v Speaker 1>leadoff hitter on the megapod. Every year he always does

0:01:38.760 --> 0:01:41.760
<v Speaker 1>our first show. He's always back for another, and Week

0:01:41.840 --> 0:01:45.960
<v Speaker 1>fifteen is his calling. It is Las Vegas Hilton Super

0:01:45.959 --> 0:01:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Contest winner from the San Susi team that year. It's

0:01:49.560 --> 0:01:52.360
<v Speaker 1>Brady Cannon. Hello, Brady, I am good. How are you?

0:01:52.520 --> 0:01:53.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm doing very well. I think I might have asked

0:01:54.000 --> 0:01:56.040
<v Speaker 1>you this last time. Do you like me to say

0:01:55.760 --> 0:01:58.160
<v Speaker 1>twenty eleven anymore? You just like just say former, dude,

0:01:58.240 --> 0:02:00.760
<v Speaker 1>just say former at this point. No, No, I mean

0:02:01.320 --> 0:02:04.360
<v Speaker 1>that that was a fantastic year for me, so I'll

0:02:04.400 --> 0:02:07.520
<v Speaker 1>never let it go. I mean it was. It's starting

0:02:07.520 --> 0:02:10.040
<v Speaker 1>to get longer and longer ago. But hey, you're you

0:02:10.160 --> 0:02:13.480
<v Speaker 1>still got the title. I remember back in the day,

0:02:13.560 --> 0:02:15.799
<v Speaker 1>you know, when you first had me on after that

0:02:16.280 --> 0:02:19.880
<v Speaker 1>contest victory, we were talking about, you know, the money

0:02:19.960 --> 0:02:23.360
<v Speaker 1>is really nice, um, but it's really all about the title.

0:02:23.919 --> 0:02:26.600
<v Speaker 1>And as the years have gone on, that is more

0:02:26.639 --> 0:02:29.840
<v Speaker 1>and more rings true. It's about having that title. They

0:02:29.840 --> 0:02:31.440
<v Speaker 1>can never take it away from you. Are you in

0:02:31.480 --> 0:02:33.320
<v Speaker 1>the rings? Do they have a ring of fame there

0:02:33.360 --> 0:02:35.519
<v Speaker 1>at the Westgate now with the former title holders. I

0:02:35.680 --> 0:02:37.560
<v Speaker 1>don't think they have a ring of fame, but I

0:02:37.600 --> 0:02:43.120
<v Speaker 1>do have a ring. There's a ring ceremony in all right. Yeah,

0:02:43.160 --> 0:02:46.480
<v Speaker 1>they had that, Uh, I think they had that before

0:02:46.520 --> 0:02:50.280
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of last year's contest. They invited all the

0:02:50.320 --> 0:02:53.160
<v Speaker 1>former winners and handed out rings and stuff, so that

0:02:53.160 --> 0:02:55.040
<v Speaker 1>that was very cool. All right. How are you doing

0:02:55.080 --> 0:02:57.520
<v Speaker 1>this year? Uh? Five hundred? Not so good. We were

0:02:57.560 --> 0:03:01.280
<v Speaker 1>actually uh doing pretty well and sir and you know

0:03:01.360 --> 0:03:05.000
<v Speaker 1>had a chance and then uh craft the bed last week.

0:03:05.080 --> 0:03:08.200
<v Speaker 1>So we're done there too. It's onto the mini contest,

0:03:08.280 --> 0:03:12.639
<v Speaker 1>as I say, which begins this week. Yeah, circa I'm

0:03:13.120 --> 0:03:16.880
<v Speaker 1>I guess I'm alive in the final circle quarterly, Michael,

0:03:17.200 --> 0:03:19.800
<v Speaker 1>what is the update on the uh the last of

0:03:19.840 --> 0:03:23.040
<v Speaker 1>the four quarter prizes. Well, remember everyone, this is a

0:03:23.080 --> 0:03:26.760
<v Speaker 1>five week quarter, because there are seventeen weeks in the

0:03:26.880 --> 0:03:29.760
<v Speaker 1>NFL season with buys. We have two entries, and it

0:03:29.840 --> 0:03:32.200
<v Speaker 1>happened to be by the same gentleman that are at

0:03:32.280 --> 0:03:35.640
<v Speaker 1>ten and old. Wow. For him, the good news is

0:03:35.640 --> 0:03:37.440
<v Speaker 1>he's in good shape. But for him, the bad news

0:03:37.480 --> 0:03:42.040
<v Speaker 1>is he's got three weeks to go, not to one

0:03:42.240 --> 0:03:44.920
<v Speaker 1>entry at nine and a half points, and then another

0:03:45.040 --> 0:03:48.920
<v Speaker 1>fourteen at nine overall, you know, overall for the season.

0:03:49.440 --> 0:03:52.440
<v Speaker 1>Our friend the booty blockers UH is still in the

0:03:52.520 --> 0:03:55.480
<v Speaker 1>league at forty nine and a half points. He leads

0:03:55.880 --> 0:03:59.480
<v Speaker 1>m J Tad by one point and Live Odds by

0:03:59.520 --> 0:04:02.160
<v Speaker 1>a point and a half, and then it's another Uh

0:04:02.280 --> 0:04:04.640
<v Speaker 1>point and a half back to the next three. So uh,

0:04:05.280 --> 0:04:08.880
<v Speaker 1>only only three people within actually two and a half

0:04:08.920 --> 0:04:12.640
<v Speaker 1>points in the league. Those three people's lives right now

0:04:13.080 --> 0:04:17.239
<v Speaker 1>are obsessed with this, like they can think of nothing

0:04:17.279 --> 0:04:19.480
<v Speaker 1>else at this time of year. Well, but if your

0:04:19.560 --> 0:04:22.599
<v Speaker 1>name was booty blocker, you might be thinking of other things,

0:04:22.800 --> 0:04:26.000
<v Speaker 1>don't you think? Not? For for at least three weeks

0:04:26.000 --> 0:04:27.760
<v Speaker 1>you're not gonna be speaking about You're not gonna be

0:04:27.800 --> 0:04:30.720
<v Speaker 1>thinking about booty blog. Todd how did you do last week? Crappy?

0:04:30.800 --> 0:04:32.400
<v Speaker 1>I think I think I was either three and two

0:04:32.440 --> 0:04:34.520
<v Speaker 1>or two and three. I think two and three. Three

0:04:34.520 --> 0:04:36.160
<v Speaker 1>and two is not crapy. So I'm three and a

0:04:36.200 --> 0:04:37.840
<v Speaker 1>half back because I went two and three and then

0:04:37.839 --> 0:04:41.440
<v Speaker 1>I went four oh and one last week, So many

0:04:41.520 --> 0:04:45.240
<v Speaker 1>people between me and the two. Tenan knows which again

0:04:45.320 --> 0:04:47.160
<v Speaker 1>he's got to. Tennan knows if he's able to keep

0:04:47.200 --> 0:04:49.520
<v Speaker 1>this up for another couple of weeks, he'll come up

0:04:49.560 --> 0:04:52.919
<v Speaker 1>with the strategy of those two entries to be able

0:04:52.920 --> 0:04:56.080
<v Speaker 1>to ensure himself not maybe not to ensure himself victory,

0:04:56.120 --> 0:05:00.240
<v Speaker 1>but to maximize his chances for winning the quarterly. That's sure.

0:05:00.279 --> 0:05:03.720
<v Speaker 1>The quarterly prize that circle one thousand plus and of

0:05:03.760 --> 0:05:06.200
<v Speaker 1>course the prize to win it all is right in

0:05:06.240 --> 0:05:09.080
<v Speaker 1>the name of the contest, the circumillion. Before we get

0:05:09.120 --> 0:05:12.279
<v Speaker 1>into our best bets boys and our final two questions

0:05:12.320 --> 0:05:14.280
<v Speaker 1>at the end of course, and our teasers of the week,

0:05:14.760 --> 0:05:16.479
<v Speaker 1>we always want to talk about the Thursday night game

0:05:16.520 --> 0:05:19.680
<v Speaker 1>first tonight, not exactly a barn Bird. It's the Jets

0:05:19.680 --> 0:05:21.960
<v Speaker 1>at the Ravens right now as we speak. By the way,

0:05:22.200 --> 0:05:25.480
<v Speaker 1>the Christmas tree is lighting up and seventeens are appearing

0:05:25.480 --> 0:05:29.240
<v Speaker 1>in multiple locations. Uh this was fifteen when the news

0:05:29.279 --> 0:05:31.839
<v Speaker 1>came down from John Harbor that Lamar Jackson earlier in

0:05:31.839 --> 0:05:33.920
<v Speaker 1>the week was day to day with a quad injury

0:05:33.960 --> 0:05:37.680
<v Speaker 1>that he suffered this past weekend. But as it turns out,

0:05:37.720 --> 0:05:40.400
<v Speaker 1>and by the way, it was taken down in many locations,

0:05:40.200 --> 0:05:42.760
<v Speaker 1>the point spread was but now it's back up because

0:05:42.839 --> 0:05:45.880
<v Speaker 1>Lamar said yesterday I'm playing and it's all the way

0:05:45.880 --> 0:05:50.000
<v Speaker 1>to seventeen now. Any thoughts on this game, Brady Thursday night?

0:05:50.040 --> 0:05:53.760
<v Speaker 1>Not exactly a marquee matchup. I made the number sixteen

0:05:53.800 --> 0:05:56.880
<v Speaker 1>and a half originally, and that was on the assumption

0:05:56.960 --> 0:06:01.839
<v Speaker 1>that uh uh Jackson was going to play. I think

0:06:01.839 --> 0:06:05.480
<v Speaker 1>everybody's felt all along that he was going to play. UM,

0:06:05.520 --> 0:06:08.960
<v Speaker 1>but I think it's too many points. I actually played

0:06:08.960 --> 0:06:12.000
<v Speaker 1>the Jets on a teaser um when it was like

0:06:12.120 --> 0:06:14.160
<v Speaker 1>fifteen and a half or something took it all the

0:06:14.200 --> 0:06:17.160
<v Speaker 1>way to twenty one and a half. The Ravens have

0:06:17.240 --> 0:06:19.719
<v Speaker 1>been off a couple of pretty good tests in a

0:06:19.839 --> 0:06:23.400
<v Speaker 1>row against San Francisco and Buffalo, and then they've got

0:06:23.440 --> 0:06:26.600
<v Speaker 1>two division games coming up, so I think this is

0:06:26.640 --> 0:06:28.599
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of a hole in the schedule forum

0:06:28.800 --> 0:06:31.799
<v Speaker 1>off of a short week, I see the Jets stand

0:06:31.839 --> 0:06:34.039
<v Speaker 1>within the number. Mike, here, you scared it all that

0:06:34.160 --> 0:06:36.560
<v Speaker 1>because of that Lamar Jackson injury. Like this could be

0:06:36.600 --> 0:06:39.240
<v Speaker 1>the game where if the Ravens went up a bunch

0:06:39.960 --> 0:06:41.920
<v Speaker 1>that they might just say at some point, all right,

0:06:41.960 --> 0:06:44.400
<v Speaker 1>you've done enough here, Lamar, let's not mess around with

0:06:44.440 --> 0:06:46.800
<v Speaker 1>the quad r G three have at it, and this

0:06:46.880 --> 0:06:50.240
<v Speaker 1>could be the Todd wishnev back door special. I I

0:06:50.279 --> 0:06:52.000
<v Speaker 1>actually want to go. I'm gonna use this as a

0:06:52.080 --> 0:06:56.839
<v Speaker 1>best bet at seventeen. I'm gonna take Let's not forget

0:06:57.240 --> 0:06:59.520
<v Speaker 1>it's not just the last two games, but it's four

0:06:59.520 --> 0:07:03.920
<v Speaker 1>in a row for the Ravens Houston Big Spots, the Rams,

0:07:04.640 --> 0:07:09.040
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco and then traveling to Buffalo short week, and

0:07:09.120 --> 0:07:13.040
<v Speaker 1>remember the Jets are the number two rush defense, two

0:07:13.080 --> 0:07:17.560
<v Speaker 1>in rushing yards per carry. I think that I think

0:07:17.640 --> 0:07:20.560
<v Speaker 1>that that the Ravens are not going to be able

0:07:20.560 --> 0:07:22.280
<v Speaker 1>to move the ball up and down the field that

0:07:22.400 --> 0:07:25.520
<v Speaker 1>will as some may think, and this number is inflated.

0:07:25.560 --> 0:07:28.200
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't really make this number much closer to fourteen

0:07:28.200 --> 0:07:31.840
<v Speaker 1>than seventeen. I think with the questions about his quad,

0:07:31.960 --> 0:07:33.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't think you're gonna see him if the game

0:07:34.040 --> 0:07:37.480
<v Speaker 1>is it is a two touchdown game, where a seventeen

0:07:37.520 --> 0:07:40.120
<v Speaker 1>point game in the in in late in the third quarter,

0:07:40.240 --> 0:07:42.720
<v Speaker 1>you may see hardball pull him out for the fourth quarter.

0:07:42.880 --> 0:07:44.840
<v Speaker 1>I just think there's a lot of reasons here why

0:07:44.840 --> 0:07:46.800
<v Speaker 1>this number is is too high, and I'll make it

0:07:46.880 --> 0:07:50.360
<v Speaker 1>my first best bet Jets first best bet for Mike Phone.

0:07:50.360 --> 0:07:52.720
<v Speaker 1>By the way, my number on guessing lines was Ravens

0:07:52.760 --> 0:07:56.280
<v Speaker 1>minus fourteen on the button. Uh so I made a

0:07:56.320 --> 0:07:59.200
<v Speaker 1>bet before. When the Lamar Jackson news came down, I

0:07:59.200 --> 0:08:02.200
<v Speaker 1>immediately grabbed Jets a plus fifteen, thinking I can either

0:08:02.240 --> 0:08:04.720
<v Speaker 1>get off it if Lamar plays, or it'll be this

0:08:04.760 --> 0:08:07.120
<v Speaker 1>massive middle for me if he ends up not playing

0:08:07.120 --> 0:08:09.560
<v Speaker 1>that I could that I could make IM not so sure.

0:08:09.640 --> 0:08:11.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't like the Jets plus fifteen to be not

0:08:11.640 --> 0:08:13.360
<v Speaker 1>a best bet for me, but that's what I have

0:08:13.440 --> 0:08:16.480
<v Speaker 1>in pocket. Anyway, Todd, any thoughts here tonight. I just

0:08:16.520 --> 0:08:19.480
<v Speaker 1>want to say, historically, something happened here on the Megapod

0:08:19.560 --> 0:08:22.680
<v Speaker 1>this morning that has never happened before, and that is

0:08:23.440 --> 0:08:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Mike Palm actually gave a pick with the correct line

0:08:27.440 --> 0:08:30.480
<v Speaker 1>without having to say Todd and Gil is that the

0:08:30.560 --> 0:08:33.080
<v Speaker 1>right line and getting an extra half a point? No,

0:08:33.240 --> 0:08:36.559
<v Speaker 1>he actually got the seventeen. Didn't have to ask about

0:08:36.600 --> 0:08:39.520
<v Speaker 1>it right, didn't try to chisel or anything. She's just

0:08:39.720 --> 0:08:44.040
<v Speaker 1>gotten correct line. I gotta get a hand. I gotta

0:08:44.040 --> 0:08:46.360
<v Speaker 1>give him a hand for actually coming and being a

0:08:46.400 --> 0:08:50.960
<v Speaker 1>reasonable sports better. Thank you, Mikey. It's only because Gil

0:08:51.000 --> 0:08:53.280
<v Speaker 1>said it touched seventeen. I didn't know. I would have

0:08:53.280 --> 0:08:55.600
<v Speaker 1>had him asked, but Gill gave it away. Oh, I'm

0:08:55.640 --> 0:08:57.400
<v Speaker 1>sure you would have been like he. I'm sure he

0:08:57.400 --> 0:08:59.880
<v Speaker 1>would have been like Jets plus seventeen and a half.

0:09:00.800 --> 0:09:05.959
<v Speaker 1>Uh Okay. I will take as far as this game.

0:09:06.000 --> 0:09:08.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't want any part of it. I don't know.

0:09:08.160 --> 0:09:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Maybe i'll in game it. Who knows what you're gonna

0:09:10.800 --> 0:09:13.199
<v Speaker 1>get in these ridiculously large spreads. I will say that

0:09:13.240 --> 0:09:16.480
<v Speaker 1>you better be up within three late because this has

0:09:16.559 --> 0:09:20.920
<v Speaker 1>backdoor smelling all over it, smelling um. Maybe I'll get

0:09:20.960 --> 0:09:22.880
<v Speaker 1>involved in the total. I don't know. I don't I

0:09:22.880 --> 0:09:24.600
<v Speaker 1>don't have a real good feel in this game at all.

0:09:24.920 --> 0:09:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Ravens nine wins in a row, longest regular season win

0:09:27.320 --> 0:09:29.840
<v Speaker 1>streaking franchise history. They already clinched a playoff berth. Now

0:09:29.840 --> 0:09:32.720
<v Speaker 1>they're playing for seating. They want that number one position

0:09:33.160 --> 0:09:35.160
<v Speaker 1>and home field advantaged throughout the a f C playoffs.

0:09:35.200 --> 0:09:37.360
<v Speaker 1>Right now they are in the number one spot. They've

0:09:37.360 --> 0:09:40.000
<v Speaker 1>held eight straight opponents to twenty points or fewer. That

0:09:40.120 --> 0:09:45.319
<v Speaker 1>also ties the franchise record. Last week, first nine drives,

0:09:46.200 --> 0:09:48.680
<v Speaker 1>they held Buffalo to seven punts of fumble in a

0:09:48.760 --> 0:09:52.760
<v Speaker 1>field goal, So that's not bad Jackson. By the way,

0:09:52.840 --> 0:09:56.960
<v Speaker 1>last six games, twenty one touchdowns, one pick. Is that good?

0:09:57.520 --> 0:09:59.920
<v Speaker 1>And of course, while Baltimore came off the win against Buffalo,

0:10:00.000 --> 0:10:03.080
<v Speaker 1>I touchdown. Jets coming off a game where they beat

0:10:03.120 --> 0:10:05.840
<v Speaker 1>the Dolphins thanks to the refs helping them out at

0:10:05.880 --> 0:10:08.679
<v Speaker 1>the end, a game where ten field goals were kicked,

0:10:08.920 --> 0:10:12.760
<v Speaker 1>seven by Miami's Jason Sanders, but the Jets wanted one

0:10:12.760 --> 0:10:15.640
<v Speaker 1>on a forty four yarder from Sam Kicking ficking as

0:10:15.640 --> 0:10:19.760
<v Speaker 1>time expired. Brady best bet number one. My friend, Hey,

0:10:19.800 --> 0:10:22.640
<v Speaker 1>I want to first say I've realized something here. First

0:10:22.640 --> 0:10:26.480
<v Speaker 1>of all, it's always fun and educational and an honor

0:10:26.520 --> 0:10:28.720
<v Speaker 1>to be a part of the megapod, But this time around,

0:10:29.480 --> 0:10:31.400
<v Speaker 1>I am in the company of the winner of the

0:10:31.440 --> 0:10:35.760
<v Speaker 1>Twitter Parody Account Awards Best Supporting casino guests Mike Palm,

0:10:36.000 --> 0:10:39.200
<v Speaker 1>the runner up for Best Morning Host, Jil Alexander, and

0:10:39.280 --> 0:10:42.720
<v Speaker 1>a nominee for Best Supporting non casino guest Todd Wishnav.

0:10:43.040 --> 0:10:46.079
<v Speaker 1>This is Beast and Royalty here, gentlemen, Mike. Mike takes

0:10:46.120 --> 0:10:48.880
<v Speaker 1>these polls very seriously, don't you, Mike Brady. I'm gonna

0:10:48.920 --> 0:10:51.680
<v Speaker 1>win my second Golden Mike today is Derrick Stevens and

0:10:51.720 --> 0:10:55.000
<v Speaker 1>I are over as best. My guys in the Desert

0:10:55.120 --> 0:11:03.240
<v Speaker 1>side Piece. Oh my goodness. I thought side Pieces was

0:11:03.280 --> 0:11:06.760
<v Speaker 1>like a sexual thing. That's exactly what it is. Taught. Yes,

0:11:07.040 --> 0:11:09.200
<v Speaker 1>I know that it's a joke. I was making a

0:11:09.280 --> 0:11:11.480
<v Speaker 1>joke as well. Thank you, Gil. It sounded like you

0:11:11.480 --> 0:11:14.200
<v Speaker 1>were actually for actual clarification, That's what it sounds like.

0:11:14.400 --> 0:11:17.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm pretty stoked to be uh in the presence of

0:11:17.400 --> 0:11:20.720
<v Speaker 1>you award winning folks. Thank you, Thank you so much.

0:11:21.120 --> 0:11:23.120
<v Speaker 1>Only Mikey can really say that he took the crown

0:11:23.280 --> 0:11:26.080
<v Speaker 1>on these pools. Let's not. Let's not gloss over the

0:11:26.120 --> 0:11:29.160
<v Speaker 1>margin of victory over John Murray, who gets much more

0:11:29.280 --> 0:11:33.360
<v Speaker 1>visa airtime. John Murray is co hosting with Parles on

0:11:33.440 --> 0:11:36.160
<v Speaker 1>Monday and Tuesday. He gets to go on Brent Show

0:11:36.280 --> 0:11:39.120
<v Speaker 1>for half hour on Wednesday. He has his own show

0:11:39.160 --> 0:11:41.560
<v Speaker 1>with j VT and Humans on Sunday night, and I

0:11:41.600 --> 0:11:43.920
<v Speaker 1>can barely get on the freaking network. And I took

0:11:44.000 --> 0:11:47.320
<v Speaker 1>him out in a body bag. Okay, what do you

0:11:47.320 --> 0:11:49.320
<v Speaker 1>what do you think is the most impressive result on that?

0:11:49.360 --> 0:11:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Do you think if it was a parody account for

0:11:51.440 --> 0:11:55.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, Mike me, how much percent do you

0:11:55.040 --> 0:11:57.559
<v Speaker 1>think I would get over the other candidates in my category?

0:11:57.720 --> 0:11:59.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, but I think that I think Gil,

0:12:00.040 --> 0:12:02.839
<v Speaker 1>that you would have had a real live shot of

0:12:03.240 --> 0:12:07.480
<v Speaker 1>winning that category, except I think your power raiding went

0:12:07.480 --> 0:12:11.880
<v Speaker 1>down with these Wednesday shows. I'll be honest. I think

0:12:11.920 --> 0:12:14.959
<v Speaker 1>Bill could have Bill could have totally. That's hysterical, Mike,

0:12:14.960 --> 0:12:18.200
<v Speaker 1>you just hysterically. UM, I would have. I would have

0:12:18.240 --> 0:12:21.000
<v Speaker 1>thought that Gil could definitely beat the racing car show

0:12:21.040 --> 0:12:24.920
<v Speaker 1>guy for sure. He was I don't believe he was

0:12:24.960 --> 0:12:28.880
<v Speaker 1>mentioned in the poll. Probably could have been him. All right, Brady,

0:12:28.920 --> 0:12:32.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, We're just we went all right now. I

0:12:32.280 --> 0:12:36.440
<v Speaker 1>I started that. I apologize. My first play. Gil is

0:12:36.480 --> 0:12:38.760
<v Speaker 1>going to be on the Atlanta Falcons getting ten and

0:12:38.800 --> 0:12:42.400
<v Speaker 1>a half or eleven points at San Francisco. Um, this

0:12:42.440 --> 0:12:45.959
<v Speaker 1>is similar to the situation the Texans faced last week.

0:12:46.400 --> 0:12:48.760
<v Speaker 1>They came off of games against the Ravens and the

0:12:48.840 --> 0:12:52.800
<v Speaker 1>Colts and the Patriots with a division opponent in Tennessee

0:12:52.840 --> 0:12:56.959
<v Speaker 1>on deck. The forty Niners are coming off of Green Bay,

0:12:57.240 --> 0:13:00.240
<v Speaker 1>Baltimore and New Orleans, and of course that last one

0:13:00.280 --> 0:13:03.000
<v Speaker 1>was a huge victory over the Saints, just like Houston

0:13:03.600 --> 0:13:06.040
<v Speaker 1>had a huge win in their last game at that

0:13:06.160 --> 0:13:09.720
<v Speaker 1>Trio over New England. And then big division tests on

0:13:09.840 --> 0:13:13.199
<v Speaker 1>deck for the Niners too with the Rams and the Seahawks.

0:13:13.280 --> 0:13:16.400
<v Speaker 1>So just like Denver was a little hole in the

0:13:16.440 --> 0:13:19.240
<v Speaker 1>schedule for the Texans last week, so are the Falcons

0:13:19.280 --> 0:13:23.160
<v Speaker 1>for the Niners. And not only are these two setups

0:13:23.280 --> 0:13:27.920
<v Speaker 1>very similar, but it was also two straight grueling weeks

0:13:27.960 --> 0:13:31.200
<v Speaker 1>against the Ravens and the Saints for the Niners. And

0:13:31.280 --> 0:13:34.440
<v Speaker 1>now to come back home off of that and after

0:13:34.720 --> 0:13:38.120
<v Speaker 1>and have to cover eleven points, I just think it's

0:13:38.160 --> 0:13:41.319
<v Speaker 1>too much to ask. And the Falcons on their side,

0:13:41.320 --> 0:13:43.560
<v Speaker 1>they come into this game having gone three and two

0:13:43.559 --> 0:13:47.280
<v Speaker 1>in their last five and they've outyarded their opponent in

0:13:47.400 --> 0:13:50.720
<v Speaker 1>four out of the last five. I also like you

0:13:50.760 --> 0:13:52.679
<v Speaker 1>have to go back a little ways on this one.

0:13:52.760 --> 0:13:55.760
<v Speaker 1>But I like that these organizations are pretty familiar with

0:13:55.800 --> 0:14:00.000
<v Speaker 1>one another. They were division opponents for over thirty years,

0:14:00.960 --> 0:14:04.600
<v Speaker 1>and more recently you have the Shanahan connection. They've met

0:14:04.600 --> 0:14:07.640
<v Speaker 1>in the playoffs a couple of times. Um. I think

0:14:07.679 --> 0:14:11.080
<v Speaker 1>the fact that they have that close knit history, I

0:14:11.120 --> 0:14:14.160
<v Speaker 1>think that also helps Atlanta. It's kind of like their

0:14:14.360 --> 0:14:19.640
<v Speaker 1>quasi division opponents. Now. I know San Francisco has success

0:14:19.640 --> 0:14:22.880
<v Speaker 1>against non mobile quarterbacks, and certainly Matt Ryan is that.

0:14:23.640 --> 0:14:25.720
<v Speaker 1>But again, I think the number of points is a

0:14:25.800 --> 0:14:28.960
<v Speaker 1>little strong. I made it eight, so I'll gladly take

0:14:29.000 --> 0:14:31.520
<v Speaker 1>it on the other side of a key number like ten. Yeah,

0:14:31.560 --> 0:14:34.080
<v Speaker 1>and uh, but they beat the They beat the Saints

0:14:34.080 --> 0:14:35.640
<v Speaker 1>a couple of weeks ago, so you know they could

0:14:35.800 --> 0:14:37.920
<v Speaker 1>beat a good team. Yeah, we'll give you eleven here

0:14:38.120 --> 0:14:40.760
<v Speaker 1>to Brady. Eleven, I think is the consensus on this now,

0:14:40.800 --> 0:14:43.880
<v Speaker 1>so you get the full eleven on the Falcons. Falcons

0:14:43.920 --> 0:14:46.720
<v Speaker 1>coming off win where they beat the Panthers, they doubled

0:14:46.760 --> 0:14:49.920
<v Speaker 1>them up for sixty one total yards of offense in

0:14:49.960 --> 0:14:52.640
<v Speaker 1>that game. Of course, the Niners the much more more

0:14:52.720 --> 0:14:56.280
<v Speaker 1>key forty six win over the Saints, where they amassed

0:14:56.320 --> 0:14:59.480
<v Speaker 1>five hundred sixty and total yards of offense Niners like

0:14:59.560 --> 0:15:02.200
<v Speaker 1>the rave Ends in the previous example, trying to get

0:15:02.240 --> 0:15:06.360
<v Speaker 1>home field throughout the NFC playoffs in their case eleven

0:15:06.400 --> 0:15:08.720
<v Speaker 1>and two right now. But eleven points is eleven points,

0:15:08.720 --> 0:15:12.040
<v Speaker 1>so you're banking on the Falcons covering that number. Mikey,

0:15:12.080 --> 0:15:17.000
<v Speaker 1>we already have yours. You're on the Jets plus seventeen Yes, yes, correct, alright,

0:15:17.040 --> 0:15:20.080
<v Speaker 1>And Todd, he's the seventeen and a half. Seen it

0:15:20.160 --> 0:15:22.320
<v Speaker 1>might change by the end of the show, Todd, can

0:15:22.360 --> 0:15:24.320
<v Speaker 1>I can I tell people what your best bet is

0:15:24.360 --> 0:15:27.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna be? I can almost guess it. Go ahead, Tampa

0:15:27.040 --> 0:15:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Bay over Gilly Alexander coming up big. That's why they

0:15:32.000 --> 0:15:36.160
<v Speaker 1>call him Gilly. I Tampa Bay over. I believe I

0:15:36.200 --> 0:15:38.160
<v Speaker 1>can get forty five and a half or forty six?

0:15:38.200 --> 0:15:41.560
<v Speaker 1>Which do you? Which do you say, sir? Forty six? Sorry, okay,

0:15:41.640 --> 0:15:46.040
<v Speaker 1>I'll take Tampa Bay over. I don't know if you've

0:15:46.040 --> 0:15:49.040
<v Speaker 1>ever heard me talk about the Tampa Bay Buccaneers before,

0:15:49.560 --> 0:15:54.760
<v Speaker 1>but you've listened to any megapod or any fantastic Wednesdays

0:15:54.760 --> 0:15:57.400
<v Speaker 1>on a numbers game. Even though Mike likes Monday, Tuesday,

0:15:57.440 --> 0:16:01.440
<v Speaker 1>Thursday and Friday better, um, I talk a lot about

0:16:01.480 --> 0:16:06.200
<v Speaker 1>the Tampa Bay Buccaneers being the overbetter's dream team. They're

0:16:06.200 --> 0:16:10.280
<v Speaker 1>the um you know, they're the They're just the best.

0:16:10.520 --> 0:16:13.440
<v Speaker 1>What can I say? They don't play defense, they are

0:16:13.600 --> 0:16:17.360
<v Speaker 1>very explosive offensively, and Jamis can always throw you a

0:16:17.400 --> 0:16:20.400
<v Speaker 1>pick six in for good measure. Last week and and

0:16:20.440 --> 0:16:23.080
<v Speaker 1>you know what, tell the Sharps to go jam it

0:16:23.160 --> 0:16:28.040
<v Speaker 1>up their sharp asses because they bet they betted down

0:16:28.560 --> 0:16:31.120
<v Speaker 1>from like fifty down to forty six and a half

0:16:31.120 --> 0:16:33.520
<v Speaker 1>in the indie game. And I said, are these people

0:16:33.560 --> 0:16:36.840
<v Speaker 1>out of their effing minds? This game is going over,

0:16:36.880 --> 0:16:39.680
<v Speaker 1>and it's going over huge it. I think it almost

0:16:39.680 --> 0:16:42.280
<v Speaker 1>went over in the first half. It was ridiculous. It

0:16:42.360 --> 0:16:45.120
<v Speaker 1>was the same old story. The other team, if they're

0:16:45.160 --> 0:16:47.880
<v Speaker 1>halfway decent, can move it on Tampa. Tampa can move

0:16:47.880 --> 0:16:50.480
<v Speaker 1>it on them. And then you even had a Jamis pixix.

0:16:50.600 --> 0:16:53.280
<v Speaker 1>You had everything you want in a Tampa Bay over

0:16:53.360 --> 0:16:57.080
<v Speaker 1>final score. Now, I know Mr Mike Evans is not out,

0:16:57.520 --> 0:16:59.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean is out for the season, but they still

0:16:59.760 --> 0:17:01.520
<v Speaker 1>have an off weapons, so I'm not worried about that.

0:17:01.760 --> 0:17:04.320
<v Speaker 1>I know Detroit has a backup quarterback, but he's gonna

0:17:04.320 --> 0:17:06.360
<v Speaker 1>be at home, so it's gonna be easier for him

0:17:06.359 --> 0:17:09.239
<v Speaker 1>to move the ball, So I'm not worried. Give me

0:17:09.320 --> 0:17:14.080
<v Speaker 1>the forty six over, and if it ain't broke, fix it.

0:17:14.320 --> 0:17:16.280
<v Speaker 1>The one week I told you not to bet it,

0:17:16.280 --> 0:17:19.760
<v Speaker 1>it went under. So let's go over, baby over forty

0:17:19.840 --> 0:17:22.480
<v Speaker 1>six Tampa Bay, Thank you, Hey Todd. What's the difference

0:17:22.520 --> 0:17:27.040
<v Speaker 1>between jam and jelly? Oh? Boy? Did I tell you

0:17:27.080 --> 0:17:30.160
<v Speaker 1>that one? Gil? No, I've heard this long ago Todd answer.

0:17:30.760 --> 0:17:34.280
<v Speaker 1>You can't jelly it up their sharp passes. Well, well,

0:17:34.640 --> 0:17:41.480
<v Speaker 1>well maybe you can. Tampa Bay winners of Todd the

0:17:41.600 --> 0:17:44.399
<v Speaker 1>arbiter of humor, does not get that. Tampa Bay winners

0:17:44.440 --> 0:17:46.080
<v Speaker 1>of three in a row, four of their last five.

0:17:46.400 --> 0:17:48.280
<v Speaker 1>And you're right. It was the most jamis of all

0:17:48.359 --> 0:17:50.560
<v Speaker 1>jamis games. Last week they were down fourteen where the

0:17:50.560 --> 0:17:53.399
<v Speaker 1>Bucks late in the third quarter they come back storm

0:17:53.440 --> 0:17:56.720
<v Speaker 1>back against the Colts Winston the most jamis of all

0:17:56.840 --> 0:18:00.600
<v Speaker 1>lines thirty three or forty five for four fifty six,

0:18:01.240 --> 0:18:06.440
<v Speaker 1>four touchdowns, three picks, God love it, two total yards

0:18:06.440 --> 0:18:09.119
<v Speaker 1>of offense for the Bucks, a game they won while

0:18:09.160 --> 0:18:13.159
<v Speaker 1>being minus three in turnovers. So Bucks Lions, by the

0:18:13.200 --> 0:18:17.560
<v Speaker 1>way six game losing streak were starts. First game last

0:18:17.560 --> 0:18:19.520
<v Speaker 1>week where they didn't hold a lead against the Vikings,

0:18:19.920 --> 0:18:22.600
<v Speaker 1>but the numbers forty six, Todd's going over. It's the Buccaneers.

0:18:22.640 --> 0:18:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Just a reflex, now, Todd, do you tell everybody what

0:18:24.720 --> 0:18:28.560
<v Speaker 1>my first best bet is gonna be? The Myami Dolphins?

0:18:29.119 --> 0:18:35.480
<v Speaker 1>My mom it dophens mymmon Dolphins plus three and a half.

0:18:35.880 --> 0:18:37.879
<v Speaker 1>That's exactly right. You know what bothers me about that?

0:18:37.920 --> 0:18:40.360
<v Speaker 1>You never go for the high notes on that line though,

0:18:40.520 --> 0:18:42.560
<v Speaker 1>You always chintz out at the end to use your

0:18:42.600 --> 0:18:47.240
<v Speaker 1>expressions because I'm not. I'm not really a talent um musically.

0:18:47.280 --> 0:18:50.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm more of a just a cerebral type of guy.

0:18:50.640 --> 0:18:58.280
<v Speaker 1>Mathematics and charisma, Oh, math and charisma. What can I

0:18:58.320 --> 0:19:02.000
<v Speaker 1>tell you, Mike, He's Ready's right. Charismatics, I believe we

0:19:02.040 --> 0:19:04.080
<v Speaker 1>call that when we put them both together. I think

0:19:04.160 --> 0:19:07.520
<v Speaker 1>also I've proven to be athletically inclined as well. Some

0:19:07.560 --> 0:19:11.200
<v Speaker 1>tennis matches might say something to that effect. Here we go.

0:19:12.040 --> 0:19:14.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm taking the Dolphins every week for guessing lines. For

0:19:14.880 --> 0:19:17.359
<v Speaker 1>those who listen to guessing lines, you know my story

0:19:17.400 --> 0:19:20.720
<v Speaker 1>with the Dolphins ever since that Miami Pittsburgh game, which

0:19:20.760 --> 0:19:24.040
<v Speaker 1>was the farthest off guests in guessing lines history, I

0:19:24.080 --> 0:19:27.400
<v Speaker 1>guessed seven and a half. It ended up being fourteen

0:19:27.480 --> 0:19:30.440
<v Speaker 1>or fourteen and a half in favor of the Steelers Dolphins,

0:19:30.440 --> 0:19:32.560
<v Speaker 1>by the way, proving me right. It's been the case

0:19:32.600 --> 0:19:34.399
<v Speaker 1>with the Dolphins every week, with the exception of one

0:19:34.440 --> 0:19:36.560
<v Speaker 1>game a couple of weeks ago. Every week I have

0:19:36.680 --> 0:19:39.280
<v Speaker 1>to tell him in guessing lines, I make a line

0:19:39.320 --> 0:19:41.760
<v Speaker 1>for what I believe it should be versus what I

0:19:41.920 --> 0:19:45.600
<v Speaker 1>know now. The market will probably make it. And in

0:19:45.600 --> 0:19:48.320
<v Speaker 1>this particular case, I said, this should be a pick

0:19:48.400 --> 0:19:51.280
<v Speaker 1>um to me Miami at the Giants. But knowing what

0:19:51.359 --> 0:19:53.520
<v Speaker 1>I know about the market and how it treats the Dolphins,

0:19:53.680 --> 0:19:56.160
<v Speaker 1>I'll say it's the Giants two and a half or three.

0:19:56.600 --> 0:19:58.600
<v Speaker 1>And Chrissie comes back and he told and he tells me,

0:19:59.040 --> 0:20:01.360
<v Speaker 1>guess what, it's three and a half in some spots,

0:20:01.560 --> 0:20:03.720
<v Speaker 1>and it's three and a half everywhere. Why did the

0:20:03.760 --> 0:20:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Giants get a hook in this? Are you kidding me?

0:20:06.640 --> 0:20:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Auto play the Dolphins with Ryan Fitzpatrick. We've said it

0:20:10.040 --> 0:20:14.960
<v Speaker 1>a thousand times. They're not horrible when Ryan Fitzpatrick is

0:20:14.960 --> 0:20:17.520
<v Speaker 1>the starting quarterback. What have the Giants done? By the way,

0:20:17.560 --> 0:20:20.119
<v Speaker 1>Eli was good for a half last week Monday Night

0:20:20.119 --> 0:20:23.320
<v Speaker 1>against the Eagles and then nothing after that. But the

0:20:23.440 --> 0:20:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Giants shouldn't be three and a hook against I don't know,

0:20:26.640 --> 0:20:30.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe anybody give me the Dolphins, rinse and repeat second verse,

0:20:31.000 --> 0:20:33.720
<v Speaker 1>same as the first Dolphins plus the three and a half,

0:20:33.760 --> 0:20:35.879
<v Speaker 1>Thank you very much. By the way, they should have

0:20:35.880 --> 0:20:38.359
<v Speaker 1>won out right against the Jets last week. Dolphins, my

0:20:38.440 --> 0:20:40.919
<v Speaker 1>first best been so todd and I broken records. But

0:20:40.960 --> 0:20:42.480
<v Speaker 1>it keeps working for us. By the way, did I

0:20:42.480 --> 0:20:44.560
<v Speaker 1>mention I was three and oh finally last week with

0:20:44.600 --> 0:20:47.080
<v Speaker 1>a teaser that actually won. I don't know if I

0:20:47.119 --> 0:20:50.879
<v Speaker 1>mentioned that, Brady your number two. Hey, I gotta mention

0:20:50.960 --> 0:20:53.760
<v Speaker 1>real quick here on the Dolphins, I actually guess the

0:20:53.880 --> 0:20:56.520
<v Speaker 1>same number as you. That week with the Steelers, I

0:20:56.520 --> 0:20:58.600
<v Speaker 1>I guess seven and a half as well. That was

0:20:58.640 --> 0:21:01.680
<v Speaker 1>the line I made, unbelieve, and this week I make Yeah,

0:21:01.720 --> 0:21:04.480
<v Speaker 1>And this week I make the line Giants minus one.

0:21:05.080 --> 0:21:07.919
<v Speaker 1>So I agree with you. I I do have a

0:21:07.960 --> 0:21:11.280
<v Speaker 1>play on the Dolphins. My best bet though, I am

0:21:11.320 --> 0:21:13.879
<v Speaker 1>going with the Denver Broncos getting nine or nine and

0:21:13.880 --> 0:21:16.479
<v Speaker 1>a half and it was Atlanta. Yeah, didn't you want

0:21:16.560 --> 0:21:19.840
<v Speaker 1>my second second one? Oh? He's calling it second best.

0:21:19.880 --> 0:21:22.120
<v Speaker 1>I didn't understand. Sorry, Todd, is this your first podcast

0:21:22.119 --> 0:21:26.600
<v Speaker 1>with us? No? I didn't hear him say second best bet?

0:21:26.640 --> 0:21:29.680
<v Speaker 1>My fault. Sorry, Brady, I apologize. Well, you did ask

0:21:29.760 --> 0:21:32.720
<v Speaker 1>me for my second correct host Gilt, Yes I did, Yes,

0:21:32.720 --> 0:21:34.760
<v Speaker 1>I did. Todd doesn't listen. He just thinks about the

0:21:34.800 --> 0:21:37.119
<v Speaker 1>next thing he's going to say. I am going with

0:21:37.160 --> 0:21:40.000
<v Speaker 1>the Denver Broncos getting nine or nine and a half

0:21:40.000 --> 0:21:44.000
<v Speaker 1>of Kansas City and uh, the last two. The last

0:21:44.040 --> 0:21:47.320
<v Speaker 1>time these two teams met, the Chiefs one in Denver

0:21:47.680 --> 0:21:52.560
<v Speaker 1>thirty to six. And I believe that that, plus the

0:21:52.600 --> 0:21:55.399
<v Speaker 1>way Kansas City comes into this game, has inflated the

0:21:55.400 --> 0:21:58.880
<v Speaker 1>point spread. The Chiefs have won three games in a row,

0:21:59.520 --> 0:22:02.360
<v Speaker 1>they hammer of the Raiders and they one at Foxborough,

0:22:02.400 --> 0:22:05.399
<v Speaker 1>which is a very big deal. And in that game,

0:22:05.920 --> 0:22:09.680
<v Speaker 1>the general betting public was all over Kansas City. So

0:22:09.840 --> 0:22:12.359
<v Speaker 1>I think it's possible that the books have bumped this

0:22:12.440 --> 0:22:15.120
<v Speaker 1>up a little bit because they know that the masses

0:22:15.359 --> 0:22:19.280
<v Speaker 1>are in love with Kansas City again. Now the Broncos,

0:22:19.560 --> 0:22:22.080
<v Speaker 1>they have won two in a row, they've covered three

0:22:22.080 --> 0:22:25.720
<v Speaker 1>out of their last four. I like the rushing attack

0:22:25.880 --> 0:22:28.919
<v Speaker 1>of Royce Freeman and Philip Lindsay and they will be

0:22:28.960 --> 0:22:32.200
<v Speaker 1>facing the twenty eight ranked rushing defense in the league.

0:22:32.960 --> 0:22:36.000
<v Speaker 1>And I gotta tell you, guys, I like Drew Lock

0:22:36.160 --> 0:22:38.600
<v Speaker 1>what I've seen out of this guy. I think he

0:22:38.640 --> 0:22:41.359
<v Speaker 1>has really looked sharp and he's made some very big

0:22:41.440 --> 0:22:45.280
<v Speaker 1>boy NFL throws in his two games. Um, the Chiefs

0:22:45.800 --> 0:22:49.600
<v Speaker 1>past defense is solid, but if Denver can establish success

0:22:49.600 --> 0:22:51.320
<v Speaker 1>on the ground, I think Locks should be able to

0:22:51.359 --> 0:22:54.479
<v Speaker 1>make a few throws. Now, obviously this is also a

0:22:54.520 --> 0:22:58.399
<v Speaker 1>division game, uh, Denver. You know, if you go back

0:22:58.560 --> 0:23:02.080
<v Speaker 1>and look through the alls of point spread history, they

0:23:02.119 --> 0:23:05.359
<v Speaker 1>haven't been catching this uh, this many points against the

0:23:05.440 --> 0:23:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs in this series in over forty years, and they've

0:23:08.800 --> 0:23:12.480
<v Speaker 1>never been a double digit underdog to Kansas City. Uh,

0:23:12.520 --> 0:23:15.639
<v Speaker 1>it's very difficult to sweep the season series against the

0:23:15.680 --> 0:23:19.359
<v Speaker 1>division opponent. So the Broncos, of course, they're looking to

0:23:19.400 --> 0:23:21.960
<v Speaker 1>avenge that loss they took to Kansas City earlier this

0:23:22.000 --> 0:23:26.560
<v Speaker 1>season at home. Mind you, Um, I made this number

0:23:26.640 --> 0:23:29.080
<v Speaker 1>seven and it opened up ten and a half and

0:23:29.080 --> 0:23:33.399
<v Speaker 1>there were even some elevens. And let's also remember the

0:23:33.520 --> 0:23:36.880
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs have lost three out of their last four home games,

0:23:37.680 --> 0:23:40.720
<v Speaker 1>so maybe there's too much home field advantage being built

0:23:40.760 --> 0:23:44.199
<v Speaker 1>into this line here as well. I don't know, but

0:23:44.320 --> 0:23:46.440
<v Speaker 1>I just think it's too many points to give the Broncos.

0:23:46.720 --> 0:23:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Nine and a half is what you get. The Broncos

0:23:48.640 --> 0:23:51.359
<v Speaker 1>at Broncos thirty one points in the first half last week.

0:23:51.600 --> 0:23:53.720
<v Speaker 1>They hadn't had a game with twenty five all year

0:23:53.800 --> 0:23:56.680
<v Speaker 1>thirty one in the first half. Drew Lock twenty two

0:23:57.119 --> 0:24:00.320
<v Speaker 1>of twenty seven for three oh nine three touchdowns pick

0:24:00.800 --> 0:24:03.360
<v Speaker 1>He was sacked once. Kansas City did clinch their fourth

0:24:03.440 --> 0:24:06.960
<v Speaker 1>straight a f C West title, nine plus wins now

0:24:07.000 --> 0:24:10.920
<v Speaker 1>in all seven seasons under Andy Reid for the Chiefs.

0:24:10.960 --> 0:24:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Brady on the Broncos and Todd you started off wishing

0:24:14.080 --> 0:24:17.160
<v Speaker 1>to have Wednesday grievances by saying, maybe we owe Vic

0:24:17.200 --> 0:24:20.679
<v Speaker 1>Fangio and apology. Huh. Yes. I was shocked that Mr

0:24:20.800 --> 0:24:24.600
<v Speaker 1>vic Flaccio Fangio was actually getting his team in order

0:24:24.640 --> 0:24:27.440
<v Speaker 1>after burning all my money early in the season, and

0:24:27.720 --> 0:24:29.879
<v Speaker 1>he's been much better. I mean, you know, they almost

0:24:29.880 --> 0:24:32.760
<v Speaker 1>had Minnesota beat on the road and then they thrashed

0:24:32.960 --> 0:24:35.480
<v Speaker 1>uh Houston on the road. Now, Drew Lock, by the way,

0:24:35.520 --> 0:24:38.280
<v Speaker 1>he in college, he reminded me of Jeff George, an

0:24:38.280 --> 0:24:41.520
<v Speaker 1>amazing talent at arm not exactly a talent at head,

0:24:41.600 --> 0:24:46.000
<v Speaker 1>So I'll have to, you know, be proven wrong before

0:24:46.040 --> 0:24:48.159
<v Speaker 1>I get too excited about Drew lock. But I have

0:24:48.240 --> 0:24:50.439
<v Speaker 1>to agree with with Brady's pick because you know that

0:24:50.520 --> 0:24:54.639
<v Speaker 1>can't be defense aimed special anyways, not exactly a talented head.

0:24:55.240 --> 0:24:59.320
<v Speaker 1>Mike number two. I agree with you, Gil, Uh, this

0:24:59.480 --> 0:25:01.320
<v Speaker 1>is actually best bet, but I had to give the

0:25:01.400 --> 0:25:04.760
<v Speaker 1>Jets first because of the chronology of the show. Dolphins

0:25:04.800 --> 0:25:07.040
<v Speaker 1>plus three and a half. I've actually taken them plus

0:25:07.040 --> 0:25:11.000
<v Speaker 1>one sixty five on the money line here. Uh, let's

0:25:11.119 --> 0:25:16.199
<v Speaker 1>be honest. You know, if Todd Wish Division two Basketball

0:25:16.280 --> 0:25:19.399
<v Speaker 1>never was was covering Darius Slayton Monday Night instead of

0:25:19.480 --> 0:25:22.480
<v Speaker 1>Ronald Darby. I think the Giants come away with six

0:25:22.520 --> 0:25:26.080
<v Speaker 1>points max in that game. All Right, we are all

0:25:26.119 --> 0:25:28.800
<v Speaker 1>in love with the ELI storyline, and maybe that affects

0:25:28.840 --> 0:25:31.280
<v Speaker 1>this point spread. The Dolphins are a better team than

0:25:31.320 --> 0:25:35.440
<v Speaker 1>the Giants. They're better coach, they have a better quarterback,

0:25:35.920 --> 0:25:40.000
<v Speaker 1>and they've been outside of one game, they've been at

0:25:40.280 --> 0:25:43.920
<v Speaker 1>worst a mediocre NFL team the last seven weeks. I'll

0:25:43.920 --> 0:25:45.800
<v Speaker 1>take three and a half all day. Is that gonna

0:25:45.840 --> 0:25:47.240
<v Speaker 1>be three and a half? In circle? You think you

0:25:47.240 --> 0:25:49.240
<v Speaker 1>think they're gonna Shade. Well, I don't know. It doesn't

0:25:49.240 --> 0:25:51.160
<v Speaker 1>seem to be coming off this number, so I don't

0:25:51.160 --> 0:25:54.119
<v Speaker 1>think we want to try to avoid the flat threes

0:25:54.160 --> 0:25:56.160
<v Speaker 1>because of all the pushes. So I think they'll stay

0:25:56.160 --> 0:25:57.840
<v Speaker 1>with three and a half. Yeah, that's gonna I think

0:25:57.840 --> 0:25:59.919
<v Speaker 1>that's gonna be the number one pick. That would be

0:26:00.000 --> 0:26:04.120
<v Speaker 1>I guess I have Mikey down. Is Miami plus four? Yes? Yes,

0:26:05.080 --> 0:26:09.080
<v Speaker 1>my death for whatever number you want to concoct, Todd,

0:26:09.080 --> 0:26:11.879
<v Speaker 1>what's your number two? Man? Well, I was gonna go

0:26:11.960 --> 0:26:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Miami too. I'm getting a little nervous that everybody likes

0:26:15.000 --> 0:26:17.800
<v Speaker 1>Miami so much, so I'll give you my my third

0:26:17.800 --> 0:26:20.360
<v Speaker 1>pick before my second pick, which was gonna be Miami.

0:26:20.960 --> 0:26:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Um wait wait, so is Miami your second pick? No,

0:26:26.280 --> 0:26:28.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm deciding whether I want to make it my third

0:26:28.640 --> 0:26:31.040
<v Speaker 1>pick now, and I have another ten minutes to decide.

0:26:31.080 --> 0:26:35.359
<v Speaker 1>So calm down. I won't take the Bears. I'll be

0:26:35.359 --> 0:26:39.399
<v Speaker 1>sure to relax. Yes, Chicago Bears, you've heard of this.

0:26:40.240 --> 0:26:44.240
<v Speaker 1>You're Chicago Bears with Mitchell Trabisky at the quarterback position

0:26:44.600 --> 0:26:47.040
<v Speaker 1>plus the four. Now I know people are staying to

0:26:47.080 --> 0:26:52.560
<v Speaker 1>themselves right now, Are you crazy? Mitchell Trabisky are you

0:26:52.600 --> 0:26:56.440
<v Speaker 1>out of your mind. Uh maybe maybe I am out

0:26:56.440 --> 0:26:59.040
<v Speaker 1>of my mind, but that's probably for other reasons. The

0:26:59.080 --> 0:27:03.240
<v Speaker 1>Mitchell Tropis Ski has sort of and I don't want

0:27:03.240 --> 0:27:06.479
<v Speaker 1>to go too crazy here, but has sort of gone

0:27:06.960 --> 0:27:09.360
<v Speaker 1>back to the road of last year a little bit,

0:27:09.680 --> 0:27:13.320
<v Speaker 1>using his legs a little more somehow, actually doing something

0:27:13.359 --> 0:27:16.879
<v Speaker 1>good offensively every once in a while, and not making

0:27:16.920 --> 0:27:20.639
<v Speaker 1>too many mistakes. The Green Bay Packers, on the other hand,

0:27:21.080 --> 0:27:24.600
<v Speaker 1>have not shown me anything special for five weeks. They

0:27:24.640 --> 0:27:28.080
<v Speaker 1>got blown out in San Diego or l A or

0:27:28.080 --> 0:27:31.480
<v Speaker 1>wherever those games are played. They got blown out over there.

0:27:31.760 --> 0:27:35.560
<v Speaker 1>They played a couple of other teams. That one team

0:27:35.560 --> 0:27:37.560
<v Speaker 1>that they beat the big deal. So they beat the Giants,

0:27:37.600 --> 0:27:39.960
<v Speaker 1>Give me a break that that doesn't impress me at all.

0:27:40.440 --> 0:27:43.200
<v Speaker 1>And there are other win was against Clem Haskins where

0:27:43.240 --> 0:27:45.679
<v Speaker 1>they barely were able to squeak out a win in

0:27:45.720 --> 0:27:48.800
<v Speaker 1>that one. So give me a break. What's wrong with

0:27:48.840 --> 0:27:52.320
<v Speaker 1>the Green Bay Packers don't look like a healthy you

0:27:52.359 --> 0:27:55.040
<v Speaker 1>know juggernaut. Oh they got blown out against San Francisco.

0:27:55.359 --> 0:27:57.600
<v Speaker 1>They barely beat Caroline in a in a in a

0:27:57.760 --> 0:28:01.000
<v Speaker 1>in a winter storm. I mean agreement to Packers don't

0:28:01.000 --> 0:28:04.119
<v Speaker 1>impress me. It's a division game, as Brady has said,

0:28:04.359 --> 0:28:07.480
<v Speaker 1>and he is right on. It's a division game. That's

0:28:07.520 --> 0:28:10.720
<v Speaker 1>another reason. And I'm getting four points in an NFL

0:28:10.760 --> 0:28:14.480
<v Speaker 1>football game if Mitchell Robinski doesn't blow up as he

0:28:14.920 --> 0:28:18.119
<v Speaker 1>is so wont to do. Often times, I think somehow

0:28:18.400 --> 0:28:21.880
<v Speaker 1>I squeak out to win plus four. Aaron Jones last

0:28:21.920 --> 0:28:24.840
<v Speaker 1>week sixteen carries one thirty four to touchdown six catches

0:28:24.880 --> 0:28:29.120
<v Speaker 1>for fifty eight against Dwayne Haskins Jr. And the Redskins.

0:28:29.119 --> 0:28:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Todd refuses to call him Dayne Haskins. He calls him

0:28:31.000 --> 0:28:35.160
<v Speaker 1>Clem Haskins, former Washington Bullet, former Golden Gophers head coach

0:28:35.480 --> 0:28:39.040
<v Speaker 1>in the basketball arena um and Matt Lafleur first Packers

0:28:39.080 --> 0:28:41.240
<v Speaker 1>coach ever to win ten plus games in the first season.

0:28:41.680 --> 0:28:45.320
<v Speaker 1>Not Vince Lombardi, not Bart Star, not Forest greg not

0:28:45.400 --> 0:28:50.360
<v Speaker 1>Mike McCarthy. Matt Lafleur formerly on the staffs four teen

0:28:50.400 --> 0:28:53.440
<v Speaker 1>game schedule, Right, that is correct in the case of

0:28:53.480 --> 0:28:55.720
<v Speaker 1>the Lombardies in the Forest Gregg's and the bart Stars

0:28:55.720 --> 0:28:57.720
<v Speaker 1>of the world. Yes, that would be true. That is

0:28:57.760 --> 0:29:01.000
<v Speaker 1>a very good point, young Todd. My number two pick

0:29:01.160 --> 0:29:04.200
<v Speaker 1>would be, you know, it's a low total in that

0:29:04.280 --> 0:29:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Green Bay game. It's uh, it's fourty and a half.

0:29:06.680 --> 0:29:08.760
<v Speaker 1>But there's one game that's lower than that. In fact,

0:29:09.320 --> 0:29:12.440
<v Speaker 1>it's the lowest total in any NFL game this season,

0:29:12.920 --> 0:29:16.120
<v Speaker 1>Buffalo in Pittsburgh Sunday Night Football. And I'm not playing

0:29:16.120 --> 0:29:20.800
<v Speaker 1>the total. I'm playing the Buffalo Bills catching one and

0:29:20.840 --> 0:29:23.760
<v Speaker 1>a half. Buffalo Bills catching one and a half against

0:29:23.800 --> 0:29:26.480
<v Speaker 1>the Pittsburgh Steelers. This is more of a fate of

0:29:26.520 --> 0:29:28.720
<v Speaker 1>the Steelers than it is a backing of the Bills.

0:29:28.760 --> 0:29:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Quite frankly, I like the Bills. Um. They did allow

0:29:31.480 --> 0:29:33.720
<v Speaker 1>a season high six sacks to the Ravens last week,

0:29:33.880 --> 0:29:36.440
<v Speaker 1>when they had only allowed four in the previous four games.

0:29:36.520 --> 0:29:38.880
<v Speaker 1>But this is about Pittsburgh to me. Pittsburgh, who give

0:29:38.960 --> 0:29:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Mike Tomlin all the credit in the world, started one

0:29:40.960 --> 0:29:43.640
<v Speaker 1>and four. They've won seven of eight since. By the way,

0:29:43.760 --> 0:29:47.479
<v Speaker 1>we just talked about Matt lafloor Stad eight plus wins

0:29:47.480 --> 0:29:52.240
<v Speaker 1>in all thirteen seasons under Mike Tomlin. That's impressive, dude, Like,

0:29:52.280 --> 0:29:54.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't I don't think people think of Mike Tomlin

0:29:54.520 --> 0:29:56.360
<v Speaker 1>that way. Yes, he's had big bend the whole way,

0:29:56.400 --> 0:29:59.200
<v Speaker 1>and he's had stars like Levian Bell, and Antonio Brown.

0:29:59.480 --> 0:30:02.080
<v Speaker 1>This is his best job ever. Eight wins already for

0:30:02.120 --> 0:30:04.720
<v Speaker 1>the Steelers, they're eight and five now. But here's the deal.

0:30:05.160 --> 0:30:08.360
<v Speaker 1>They have won two of their last three games on

0:30:08.480 --> 0:30:11.959
<v Speaker 1>basically one big James Washington play, and both of them

0:30:12.040 --> 0:30:14.920
<v Speaker 1>were kind of flukey in both of those games. And

0:30:14.920 --> 0:30:17.520
<v Speaker 1>then last week against the Cardinals they went in large

0:30:17.560 --> 0:30:20.320
<v Speaker 1>part because Deante Johnson returns a punt to the house.

0:30:21.120 --> 0:30:22.840
<v Speaker 1>By the way, he was good uh as a pass

0:30:22.880 --> 0:30:25.400
<v Speaker 1>catcher two six or sixty from Duck Hodges for a touchdown.

0:30:25.760 --> 0:30:29.320
<v Speaker 1>I think this Buffalo Bills defense if they can't stop

0:30:29.520 --> 0:30:34.400
<v Speaker 1>Duck Hodges and the Pittsburgh Steelers, who have really no

0:30:34.760 --> 0:30:37.120
<v Speaker 1>reliable don't. Here's the deal. The Steelers are getting James

0:30:37.120 --> 0:30:40.120
<v Speaker 1>Conner and ju Ju back, so Duck will have them

0:30:40.120 --> 0:30:44.240
<v Speaker 1>at his disposal. However, Duck was what sixteen of nineteen

0:30:44.360 --> 0:30:47.360
<v Speaker 1>last week in the game against the Cardinals, the Bills

0:30:47.360 --> 0:30:49.840
<v Speaker 1>defense rears its head. The totals thirty six. This is

0:30:49.840 --> 0:30:52.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a fun defensive struggle to watch. But give

0:30:52.720 --> 0:30:56.000
<v Speaker 1>me the Bills at Pittsburgh on Sunday night catching the

0:30:56.040 --> 0:30:58.640
<v Speaker 1>one and a half. The Bills and Steelers both in

0:30:58.720 --> 0:31:01.560
<v Speaker 1>playoff position, in right now, but the Steelers right now

0:31:01.640 --> 0:31:04.680
<v Speaker 1>teetering there in the number six spot. So uh, the

0:31:04.680 --> 0:31:07.760
<v Speaker 1>proverbial must win situation, not really it must win, but

0:31:07.840 --> 0:31:10.600
<v Speaker 1>big game for both ball clubs. Buffalo chasing the Patriots

0:31:10.600 --> 0:31:12.760
<v Speaker 1>still in the a f C East. Just one back there,

0:31:13.000 --> 0:31:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Buffalo pick number two US. The injurs don't like you

0:31:16.000 --> 0:31:18.760
<v Speaker 1>picking against the Pittsburgh Stolers because we got a great

0:31:18.760 --> 0:31:22.120
<v Speaker 1>coach and we got a quarterback from that quarterback machine

0:31:22.520 --> 0:31:26.440
<v Speaker 1>Sandford Dot Hodges. That's where all your great quarterbacks come from, Sandford.

0:31:26.480 --> 0:31:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Don't you know anything, gil Go Stollers As a Steelers fan,

0:31:30.320 --> 0:31:33.680
<v Speaker 1>how do you feel about that game? I'm worried. Okay,

0:31:33.920 --> 0:31:36.640
<v Speaker 1>that's all I needed. Brady pick number three the Monday

0:31:36.720 --> 0:31:40.880
<v Speaker 1>Night Er. I like the Indianapolis Colts getting nine points

0:31:40.880 --> 0:31:44.280
<v Speaker 1>at New Orleans against the Saints. The natural reaction here,

0:31:44.360 --> 0:31:46.640
<v Speaker 1>guys might be to think that the Saints will bounce

0:31:46.680 --> 0:31:49.760
<v Speaker 1>back after that tough loss to San Francisco last week.

0:31:50.240 --> 0:31:52.600
<v Speaker 1>But I actually think that loss was so tough on

0:31:52.640 --> 0:31:55.280
<v Speaker 1>the Saints, you know, to have lost that back and

0:31:55.400 --> 0:31:59.080
<v Speaker 1>forth shootout game in the final seconds, I think it

0:31:59.160 --> 0:32:02.040
<v Speaker 1>was more than tough. I think that was brutal, and

0:32:02.160 --> 0:32:04.480
<v Speaker 1>to ask them to get back up off the mat

0:32:04.760 --> 0:32:09.720
<v Speaker 1>and lay nearly double digits under the right Monday night lights,

0:32:10.320 --> 0:32:13.680
<v Speaker 1>I think that is a very tall task. And look

0:32:13.680 --> 0:32:18.240
<v Speaker 1>at this trend here. New Orleans is seven and seventeen

0:32:18.880 --> 0:32:22.680
<v Speaker 1>against the spread as a home favorite coming off of

0:32:22.680 --> 0:32:26.760
<v Speaker 1>a home loss. Okay, and they are oh and seven

0:32:27.400 --> 0:32:30.400
<v Speaker 1>against the spread when laying more than a touchdown in

0:32:30.440 --> 0:32:33.720
<v Speaker 1>that same scenario. So that speaks exactly to what I'm

0:32:33.760 --> 0:32:37.360
<v Speaker 1>saying here. When you suffer a heartbreaking loss at home,

0:32:37.960 --> 0:32:40.200
<v Speaker 1>I think it's even tougher to come back at home

0:32:40.280 --> 0:32:44.080
<v Speaker 1>again and have to rise above and beyond the occasion,

0:32:44.200 --> 0:32:47.040
<v Speaker 1>in other words, to have to cover a very large spread.

0:32:48.040 --> 0:32:49.760
<v Speaker 1>I think it would be better for the Saints that

0:32:49.760 --> 0:32:52.320
<v Speaker 1>that loss had been suffered on the road, or if

0:32:52.360 --> 0:32:54.880
<v Speaker 1>they were getting out on the road this week. I

0:32:54.920 --> 0:32:56.920
<v Speaker 1>think that would be more likely of a bounce back

0:32:57.040 --> 0:33:00.480
<v Speaker 1>spot then. But this having all gone down in their

0:33:00.480 --> 0:33:04.040
<v Speaker 1>own building, I think it's tough for them to get

0:33:04.040 --> 0:33:07.480
<v Speaker 1>back up for this game. Now. Both teams run and

0:33:07.520 --> 0:33:11.240
<v Speaker 1>defend the ball very well. Um, the Saints are clearly

0:33:11.280 --> 0:33:15.000
<v Speaker 1>the better passing offense, but defending the past is the

0:33:15.040 --> 0:33:19.320
<v Speaker 1>strength of the Colts defense, Uh, Indianapolis. They blew that

0:33:19.360 --> 0:33:22.400
<v Speaker 1>game last week in Tampa Bay. But I think getting

0:33:22.440 --> 0:33:24.840
<v Speaker 1>the national spotlight will be something that will be a

0:33:24.880 --> 0:33:27.040
<v Speaker 1>boost for them. I think they'll be fired up for

0:33:27.080 --> 0:33:30.040
<v Speaker 1>this game. And let's remember the last time we saw

0:33:30.080 --> 0:33:33.680
<v Speaker 1>the Colts on prime time they upset the Chiefs, winning

0:33:33.680 --> 0:33:38.120
<v Speaker 1>outright as eleven point dogs and guys. That was off

0:33:38.160 --> 0:33:42.080
<v Speaker 1>of a loss too. I made this line seven. It's

0:33:42.120 --> 0:33:45.200
<v Speaker 1>now nine. I think it might close at seven or

0:33:45.200 --> 0:33:47.320
<v Speaker 1>seven and a half. I am seeing some eight and

0:33:47.320 --> 0:33:50.680
<v Speaker 1>a half now. The Super Contest I know, came out

0:33:50.720 --> 0:33:54.200
<v Speaker 1>with eight for their static line. I think the Colts

0:33:54.200 --> 0:33:55.920
<v Speaker 1>at eight and a half are better. Is a good play.

0:33:56.120 --> 0:33:57.840
<v Speaker 1>I made it eight and a half. It is nine.

0:33:58.240 --> 0:34:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Nine is the number you will get, sir, h You'll

0:34:00.640 --> 0:34:03.320
<v Speaker 1>get the Colts plus nine here. Uh, Saints coming off

0:34:03.360 --> 0:34:06.640
<v Speaker 1>that forty to forty six heartbreaker for them. They've scored

0:34:06.680 --> 0:34:09.080
<v Speaker 1>thirty plus points in eight different games this season. That's

0:34:09.120 --> 0:34:10.880
<v Speaker 1>the most in the NFL. They had four hundred sixty

0:34:10.880 --> 0:34:13.840
<v Speaker 1>five total yards of offense and defeat. But they couldn't

0:34:13.880 --> 0:34:18.640
<v Speaker 1>double cover George Kittle apparently, um that was their big mistake,

0:34:18.680 --> 0:34:20.360
<v Speaker 1>and Kittle in one of the big plays of the

0:34:20.440 --> 0:34:24.040
<v Speaker 1>NFL season while his face mask was getting tugged at

0:34:24.040 --> 0:34:26.520
<v Speaker 1>all the way downfield converts a fourth and two and

0:34:26.560 --> 0:34:29.440
<v Speaker 1>puts the Niners in field goal position, and the Niners

0:34:29.520 --> 0:34:34.360
<v Speaker 1>end up kicking the game winner and win it. Robbie Gould, Niners,

0:34:34.560 --> 0:34:37.160
<v Speaker 1>you'll get the full nine there, young Brady for the Colts,

0:34:37.200 --> 0:34:40.240
<v Speaker 1>who are now two games out behind both the Titans

0:34:40.280 --> 0:34:43.040
<v Speaker 1>and the Texans in the a f C South. Six

0:34:43.080 --> 0:34:45.880
<v Speaker 1>and seven are the Colts, Mikey number three. All right,

0:34:45.920 --> 0:34:48.520
<v Speaker 1>let me give you a couple of pieces of information

0:34:48.560 --> 0:34:53.760
<v Speaker 1>here please uh it's circuit numbers are out, okay, Dolphins

0:34:53.760 --> 0:34:56.520
<v Speaker 1>are getting three and a half. Love it, thank you,

0:34:56.520 --> 0:34:58.640
<v Speaker 1>you love it. Also, the Colts are getting eight and

0:34:58.640 --> 0:35:02.080
<v Speaker 1>a half, not eight it like the west Gate and

0:35:02.480 --> 0:35:04.520
<v Speaker 1>the Bears Todd are getting four and a half in

0:35:04.560 --> 0:35:06.719
<v Speaker 1>the concast. So you'll like that. Thank you for that.

0:35:06.840 --> 0:35:10.480
<v Speaker 1>On the spot up my final best bet and I

0:35:10.600 --> 0:35:12.919
<v Speaker 1>bet this plus one and a half. Sunday, it's gone

0:35:12.960 --> 0:35:15.680
<v Speaker 1>the other way. I'm gonna play against the Cowboys and

0:35:15.719 --> 0:35:19.360
<v Speaker 1>take the Los Angeles Rayams laying one and a half.

0:35:19.400 --> 0:35:23.120
<v Speaker 1>I think this. You know, none of these games mean

0:35:23.200 --> 0:35:25.800
<v Speaker 1>anything for Dallas if you look at this race, because

0:35:25.840 --> 0:35:29.040
<v Speaker 1>they're they're they're four no in conference. They just have

0:35:29.120 --> 0:35:32.040
<v Speaker 1>to beat Philadelphia and Washington the last two weeks, which

0:35:32.040 --> 0:35:36.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm not convinced they're gonna do. But uh, this team

0:35:36.160 --> 0:35:40.360
<v Speaker 1>is totally quit. That effort on Thursday night in Chicago

0:35:40.520 --> 0:35:43.440
<v Speaker 1>was amongst the worst I've seen. The tackling. They know

0:35:43.600 --> 0:35:46.759
<v Speaker 1>this coach is a lane duck. He's gone. Jerry won't

0:35:46.760 --> 0:35:49.239
<v Speaker 1>make the change till after the season, and he will

0:35:49.320 --> 0:35:51.759
<v Speaker 1>because they're not going anywhere. If they do make the playoffs,

0:35:51.960 --> 0:35:54.319
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna get beat by Seattle or San Francisco in

0:35:54.320 --> 0:35:58.839
<v Speaker 1>the first round. Hosting a game, I just I'm very

0:35:58.840 --> 0:36:01.319
<v Speaker 1>impressed at the bounce. If you looked at that game,

0:36:01.360 --> 0:36:03.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, we all, we all kicked dirt on mcvain

0:36:03.560 --> 0:36:07.160
<v Speaker 1>and the Rams after Baltimore winning there and scored touchdowns

0:36:07.160 --> 0:36:10.840
<v Speaker 1>their first seven drives. But they really bounced back nicely,

0:36:10.880 --> 0:36:14.520
<v Speaker 1>really shutting down Kyler Murray and Arizona giving them no

0:36:14.680 --> 0:36:17.319
<v Speaker 1>breath at all in that game and then that and

0:36:17.360 --> 0:36:20.200
<v Speaker 1>really controlling Russell Wilson. I think their d line has

0:36:20.560 --> 0:36:23.120
<v Speaker 1>really played well. They put a lot of pressure on

0:36:23.160 --> 0:36:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Will since Seattle really wasn't able to run the ball

0:36:25.880 --> 0:36:28.400
<v Speaker 1>as they had been so so well against the Eagles

0:36:28.440 --> 0:36:31.920
<v Speaker 1>and and against Minnesota on Monday night. I think you're

0:36:31.920 --> 0:36:34.600
<v Speaker 1>getting the better team in the better mental spot. They

0:36:34.640 --> 0:36:37.279
<v Speaker 1>have to continue to win to have a shot. And hey, look,

0:36:37.320 --> 0:36:39.640
<v Speaker 1>the Vikings are going on the road to play the Chargers,

0:36:39.840 --> 0:36:42.239
<v Speaker 1>and we know Kirk Cousins struggles on the road. So

0:36:42.600 --> 0:36:45.040
<v Speaker 1>Rams still alive for a playoff spot. I think they

0:36:45.040 --> 0:36:47.719
<v Speaker 1>win this game, and they win it rather convincingly. Yeah,

0:36:47.800 --> 0:36:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Rams are one game behind those Vikings for the NFC's

0:36:50.760 --> 0:36:53.880
<v Speaker 1>sixth playoff position. You're right about the Cowboys. I had

0:36:53.960 --> 0:36:56.239
<v Speaker 1>him against the Bears. Not an official pick, but I

0:36:56.520 --> 0:36:59.239
<v Speaker 1>played them. And you know, Aaron Shots was on a

0:36:59.320 --> 0:37:02.000
<v Speaker 1>numbers game at Easton on the show this week, began

0:37:02.000 --> 0:37:05.319
<v Speaker 1>analytics guy obviously from Football Outsiders, and he was like, yeah,

0:37:05.320 --> 0:37:07.520
<v Speaker 1>all the numbers point to the Cowboys and all of

0:37:07.560 --> 0:37:11.440
<v Speaker 1>these games, but they just don't get it done. And

0:37:11.480 --> 0:37:14.320
<v Speaker 1>they were awful that night. Rams, and they win against

0:37:14.320 --> 0:37:17.320
<v Speaker 1>the Seahawks on Sunday night. Fo total yards of offense?

0:37:17.480 --> 0:37:19.799
<v Speaker 1>What do you make of a Todd Girley thing? Though? Mike, Like,

0:37:19.840 --> 0:37:22.000
<v Speaker 1>do you think we've ever gotten a real explanation on this,

0:37:22.120 --> 0:37:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Like all of a sudden, now girls back in everything

0:37:25.120 --> 0:37:27.640
<v Speaker 1>that he always was. What happened, Well, I don't know.

0:37:27.760 --> 0:37:29.960
<v Speaker 1>Mcvais says, you know, I messed it up. I didn't

0:37:30.000 --> 0:37:32.719
<v Speaker 1>use girly, I didn't establish girly, and then golf comes on.

0:37:33.320 --> 0:37:36.000
<v Speaker 1>We're a different tame when we run girly. First. Well,

0:37:36.080 --> 0:37:37.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean I thought he was injured, that's why they

0:37:37.960 --> 0:37:40.760
<v Speaker 1>weren't trying to feature five times the game. But apparently

0:37:40.800 --> 0:37:43.759
<v Speaker 1>he's been healthy all along. The weirdest thing, one of

0:37:43.800 --> 0:37:46.240
<v Speaker 1>the one of the least like, it's just not explained.

0:37:46.239 --> 0:37:48.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we ever got an explanation on it.

0:37:48.520 --> 0:37:51.160
<v Speaker 1>Todd number three. I just like to give a little

0:37:51.480 --> 0:37:53.360
<v Speaker 1>shout out to people who use what I call the

0:37:53.440 --> 0:37:58.880
<v Speaker 1>gohou Losh model because that the Dallas Cowboys. I believe

0:37:59.000 --> 0:38:01.440
<v Speaker 1>people keep saying that Dallas Cowboys have the number one

0:38:01.480 --> 0:38:04.319
<v Speaker 1>yards per play in the NFL. Is that correct? Yes?

0:38:04.400 --> 0:38:08.320
<v Speaker 1>For the season? That is correct? Yeah? Okay, So so folks,

0:38:08.600 --> 0:38:11.840
<v Speaker 1>if you're just doing a numbers model with no googlesh

0:38:12.080 --> 0:38:14.880
<v Speaker 1>of watching games and and putting in a little eye test,

0:38:15.480 --> 0:38:17.840
<v Speaker 1>you're not going to be right. You better mix in

0:38:18.160 --> 0:38:21.800
<v Speaker 1>some google losh and it cannot be just numbers based.

0:38:22.000 --> 0:38:24.680
<v Speaker 1>I love the numbers. I'm not against the modeling, but

0:38:24.800 --> 0:38:27.719
<v Speaker 1>you cannot be only numbers based and modeling. This is

0:38:27.760 --> 0:38:30.680
<v Speaker 1>a perfect example. The Patriots have been a perfect example

0:38:30.719 --> 0:38:33.359
<v Speaker 1>over the years. Do not look good at analytics wise,

0:38:33.400 --> 0:38:36.279
<v Speaker 1>but cover spread after spread after spread. The Cowboys are

0:38:36.280 --> 0:38:39.359
<v Speaker 1>the opposite. They look great on the analytics, but of

0:38:39.400 --> 0:38:42.560
<v Speaker 1>course they cannot cover a damn game. Have you ever

0:38:42.600 --> 0:38:45.480
<v Speaker 1>eaten a goolash for real? Yes, I've had googlosh. I

0:38:45.480 --> 0:38:47.960
<v Speaker 1>believe googlesh is like a stew right. I believe. I

0:38:47.960 --> 0:38:50.080
<v Speaker 1>was gonna ask you what exactly what does one find

0:38:50.120 --> 0:38:53.000
<v Speaker 1>in a goulash? Well, you've got some analytics numbers and

0:38:53.080 --> 0:38:55.520
<v Speaker 1>a googlesh, and then you've also got some watching games

0:38:55.520 --> 0:38:56.960
<v Speaker 1>and a googlash. You mix it all up with some

0:38:57.000 --> 0:39:00.560
<v Speaker 1>tomato sauce. You got yourself a still. I thought it

0:39:00.640 --> 0:39:03.439
<v Speaker 1>was a Russian prison. Oh yeah, it could be that too.

0:39:04.239 --> 0:39:13.440
<v Speaker 1>My third pick love I love Gorky Park. That's the

0:39:13.440 --> 0:39:15.719
<v Speaker 1>difference between having Mike Palm on the show and and

0:39:15.880 --> 0:39:18.440
<v Speaker 1>just a mere mortal Mike can go with anything. Well,

0:39:18.480 --> 0:39:21.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm just I'm just making a point that art and

0:39:21.080 --> 0:39:24.280
<v Speaker 1>science have to be mix together in sports betting because

0:39:24.280 --> 0:39:27.720
<v Speaker 1>it's not purely a numbers game, even though the show

0:39:28.320 --> 0:39:32.239
<v Speaker 1>is called a numbers game. Thank you. Um Now, I

0:39:32.280 --> 0:39:35.319
<v Speaker 1>would like to make my third pick. I unfortunately like

0:39:35.440 --> 0:39:38.520
<v Speaker 1>the Miami Dolphins too, which means we're all going down

0:39:38.560 --> 0:39:42.640
<v Speaker 1>in a a in a heap. Uh yeah, it's going

0:39:42.680 --> 0:39:46.839
<v Speaker 1>to be a horrible mess. But I have to take

0:39:46.880 --> 0:39:49.719
<v Speaker 1>the Dolphins. I mean we've gone ad nauseum over this.

0:39:50.160 --> 0:39:53.279
<v Speaker 1>It's a different team with Mr Fitzpatrick. I love the

0:39:53.320 --> 0:39:56.400
<v Speaker 1>coach doing the little fancy trick play to get the

0:39:56.440 --> 0:39:59.600
<v Speaker 1>touchdown the other day. You know, we've talked enough about this.

0:40:00.040 --> 0:40:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Just give me Miami plus three and a half against

0:40:03.120 --> 0:40:07.680
<v Speaker 1>the most floundering of floundering organizations. Then New York g Men,

0:40:08.440 --> 0:40:11.480
<v Speaker 1>and hopefully I can get a w Yeah. Pat Shermer

0:40:11.600 --> 0:40:14.000
<v Speaker 1>on his last couple of weeks, here's a Giant's coach,

0:40:14.040 --> 0:40:17.440
<v Speaker 1>Matt Rule from Baylor, rumored to UH to have that

0:40:17.600 --> 0:40:21.120
<v Speaker 1>job if he wants it in New York. I hate

0:40:21.120 --> 0:40:23.319
<v Speaker 1>my third pick. Can I just preface it by saying

0:40:23.360 --> 0:40:25.799
<v Speaker 1>I hate my third pick, but yet it has to

0:40:25.800 --> 0:40:28.279
<v Speaker 1>be my pick. I have a season long thing that

0:40:28.320 --> 0:40:30.520
<v Speaker 1>I do off the grids sort of like a stock thing.

0:40:30.520 --> 0:40:32.879
<v Speaker 1>If people have listened to this show long enough, they

0:40:32.920 --> 0:40:35.000
<v Speaker 1>know my secret off the grid stock market thing that

0:40:35.040 --> 0:40:37.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm involved in with football teams, and I'm I'm a

0:40:37.600 --> 0:40:41.600
<v Speaker 1>big seller of the Oakland Raiders. However, I have to

0:40:41.640 --> 0:40:44.640
<v Speaker 1>play Oakland here giving six and a half against Jacksonville.

0:40:45.040 --> 0:40:50.080
<v Speaker 1>This is the final game at the Oakland Alameda County Colisseum.

0:40:50.200 --> 0:40:52.759
<v Speaker 1>You've heard that before. We have We heard that before

0:40:52.840 --> 0:40:54.640
<v Speaker 1>last year. That's right, we have heard it before. But this,

0:40:54.680 --> 0:40:58.000
<v Speaker 1>for real is the last game at the Oakland Alameda

0:40:58.040 --> 0:41:00.759
<v Speaker 1>County Coliseum. Because if you've driven on the freeway here

0:41:00.760 --> 0:41:03.239
<v Speaker 1>in Las Vegas, you see that that stadium will absolutely

0:41:03.280 --> 0:41:07.040
<v Speaker 1>be ready. But the reason that I'm playing the Raiders

0:41:07.040 --> 0:41:09.160
<v Speaker 1>here is because it's it's south of seven points, it's

0:41:09.200 --> 0:41:11.640
<v Speaker 1>just six and a half, and it's against Jacksonville. And

0:41:11.680 --> 0:41:16.200
<v Speaker 1>as bad as the Raiders have played, the Jacksonville Jaguars

0:41:16.239 --> 0:41:22.160
<v Speaker 1>have five straight losses by seventeen plus points. Five straight

0:41:22.160 --> 0:41:25.320
<v Speaker 1>losses by seventeen plus points. That ties the longest streak

0:41:25.360 --> 0:41:27.560
<v Speaker 1>in franchise history. Of that nine plus losses, by the

0:41:27.560 --> 0:41:30.960
<v Speaker 1>way for the Jaguars franchise for the eighth time in

0:41:31.080 --> 0:41:33.399
<v Speaker 1>nine seasons. Think about that they have that one year

0:41:33.600 --> 0:41:35.560
<v Speaker 1>where they almost beat the Patriots in the playoffs. Every

0:41:35.600 --> 0:41:39.520
<v Speaker 1>other year they suck ass and they're really sucking now.

0:41:39.640 --> 0:41:42.320
<v Speaker 1>And it doesn't matter that it's Gardner Minshew. So Jacksonville

0:41:42.360 --> 0:41:45.520
<v Speaker 1>is just playing awful football. And although it goes against

0:41:45.520 --> 0:41:47.480
<v Speaker 1>my every instinct and other things that I'm involved in,

0:41:47.880 --> 0:41:50.560
<v Speaker 1>And although Oakland has been outscored themselves one s thirty

0:41:50.600 --> 0:41:52.960
<v Speaker 1>three the last three weeks, each by twenty plus points,

0:41:53.000 --> 0:41:55.520
<v Speaker 1>by the way in those games outscored twenty one nothing

0:41:55.520 --> 0:41:57.879
<v Speaker 1>in the second half against the Titans at home last week,

0:41:57.920 --> 0:42:00.919
<v Speaker 1>they gave up five fifty to total yards of the Titans.

0:42:00.960 --> 0:42:02.839
<v Speaker 1>I'll give the six and a half here and I'll

0:42:02.840 --> 0:42:05.680
<v Speaker 1>take a big swallow. And uh, I don't know. I

0:42:05.719 --> 0:42:09.480
<v Speaker 1>have competing interests here financially, but Oakland is by the number,

0:42:09.520 --> 0:42:12.919
<v Speaker 1>my number three pick here in week fifteen. As always, guys,

0:42:12.960 --> 0:42:15.799
<v Speaker 1>support for today's show comes from bookmaker dot eu and

0:42:15.920 --> 0:42:19.320
<v Speaker 1>industry leader for close to thirty years. Pro players consider

0:42:19.400 --> 0:42:21.400
<v Speaker 1>them a musk because their first post odds take the

0:42:21.440 --> 0:42:24.759
<v Speaker 1>highest limits and pride themselves on never having kicked out

0:42:25.120 --> 0:42:28.399
<v Speaker 1>a winning player. Bookmakers a hig volume sports book best

0:42:28.400 --> 0:42:32.480
<v Speaker 1>suited for the sophisticated player, also caters to large recreational players,

0:42:32.719 --> 0:42:35.440
<v Speaker 1>and their motto is always is where the lines originate,

0:42:35.440 --> 0:42:38.160
<v Speaker 1>because chances are the sports book at which you've been

0:42:38.160 --> 0:42:41.319
<v Speaker 1>betting follows their lines. And right now, if you visit

0:42:41.360 --> 0:42:45.040
<v Speaker 1>Bookmaker dot eu slash gill, that's Bookmaker dot U slash

0:42:45.120 --> 0:42:48.640
<v Speaker 1>g I l L, you'll claim your exclusive welcome botus

0:42:48.640 --> 0:42:51.200
<v Speaker 1>of up to three hundred dollars. That's Bookmaker dot eu

0:42:51.280 --> 0:42:53.799
<v Speaker 1>slash gill. To join and claim your welcome bonus of

0:42:53.880 --> 0:42:57.239
<v Speaker 1>up to three hundred dollars right now, you will not

0:42:57.520 --> 0:43:01.360
<v Speaker 1>regret it betting the only way I know how, the

0:43:01.440 --> 0:43:06.880
<v Speaker 1>indispensable Bookmaker dot eu. Teaser time, Boys, I'm playing through

0:43:07.239 --> 0:43:11.000
<v Speaker 1>teaser victory last week, Brady, what's your two teams six

0:43:11.040 --> 0:43:14.520
<v Speaker 1>point teaser the week? I like taking the Bills. You

0:43:14.800 --> 0:43:17.319
<v Speaker 1>obviously have a best bet on the Bills. I like

0:43:17.440 --> 0:43:19.960
<v Speaker 1>taking them up to eight or eight and a half

0:43:20.080 --> 0:43:23.560
<v Speaker 1>with the UH Redskins up to ten and a half.

0:43:24.280 --> 0:43:27.560
<v Speaker 1>I actually have the Bills teased with the Rams, one

0:43:27.640 --> 0:43:30.640
<v Speaker 1>of Mike Palm's best bets, but that was before the

0:43:30.760 --> 0:43:33.600
<v Speaker 1>Rams moved to the favorite. And I don't like teasing

0:43:33.640 --> 0:43:37.480
<v Speaker 1>through the zero. So I'm gonna pair the Bills with Washington.

0:43:38.480 --> 0:43:41.400
<v Speaker 1>I made the Bills a one point favorite at Pittsburgh

0:43:41.480 --> 0:43:44.040
<v Speaker 1>and I make the Redskins a three point dog at

0:43:44.080 --> 0:43:47.680
<v Speaker 1>home to Philly. So you're getting through some key numbers

0:43:47.680 --> 0:43:50.520
<v Speaker 1>on both of these and I'm getting a touchdown more

0:43:50.560 --> 0:43:53.680
<v Speaker 1>than what I made my line. So I like it.

0:43:53.719 --> 0:43:57.120
<v Speaker 1>That's my teaser Bills and Skins bill seven and a

0:43:57.200 --> 0:44:00.279
<v Speaker 1>half for a bookkeeping purposes. For young Brady, they're getting six.

0:44:00.280 --> 0:44:03.240
<v Speaker 1>And what about Washington? What number we're giving him in Washington?

0:44:03.440 --> 0:44:06.640
<v Speaker 1>Give him even maybe a ten, because I mean it

0:44:06.719 --> 0:44:08.439
<v Speaker 1>depends on where you look. I don't know if there's

0:44:08.440 --> 0:44:10.600
<v Speaker 1>any four and a half's left out there that there are.

0:44:10.760 --> 0:44:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Some of these numbers have just changed this morning. Yeah,

0:44:13.520 --> 0:44:15.319
<v Speaker 1>Penny's still got a four and a half and been

0:44:15.400 --> 0:44:19.720
<v Speaker 1>online does, but mostly fours everywhere. So ten for young problem,

0:44:19.800 --> 0:44:22.520
<v Speaker 1>I'll take seven and a half and ten. That's just fine.

0:44:23.920 --> 0:44:26.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm with Brady with the Bills. I think they're actually

0:44:26.360 --> 0:44:29.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna win that game. Hey, they defended Lamar Jackson as

0:44:29.400 --> 0:44:32.480
<v Speaker 1>well as anybody has all year. We've sin they're actually

0:44:32.480 --> 0:44:35.359
<v Speaker 1>their defense is actually better on the road we've seen

0:44:35.400 --> 0:44:37.799
<v Speaker 1>them be very, very good on the road. I know

0:44:37.920 --> 0:44:40.960
<v Speaker 1>that the Duck Hodges is in there because he's not

0:44:41.000 --> 0:44:43.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna ask Tomins said, he's not going to kill us, right,

0:44:44.000 --> 0:44:45.799
<v Speaker 1>He's not going to make the big mistakes and and

0:44:45.800 --> 0:44:48.440
<v Speaker 1>throw the interceptions. He's going to manage the game. But

0:44:48.520 --> 0:44:51.560
<v Speaker 1>I think this plays right into the Bill's hands. I

0:44:52.239 --> 0:44:54.600
<v Speaker 1>like Allan's ability to run the ball when he needs to,

0:44:54.960 --> 0:44:56.960
<v Speaker 1>So we'll take that up to seven and a half.

0:44:57.800 --> 0:45:00.600
<v Speaker 1>And then I'm torn on this. I'm really horn on this.

0:45:01.600 --> 0:45:04.040
<v Speaker 1>The other one here, Uh you're by the way, you're

0:45:04.040 --> 0:45:08.080
<v Speaker 1>mimicking exactly my thoughts. Bills are absolutely one leg. And

0:45:08.120 --> 0:45:10.239
<v Speaker 1>then it's like a it's a it's a choice on

0:45:10.320 --> 0:45:13.879
<v Speaker 1>number two. I think I gotta take a take. Uh well, boy,

0:45:13.920 --> 0:45:16.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't know I'm gonna be. I'm gonna be with

0:45:16.160 --> 0:45:19.560
<v Speaker 1>Brady's pick and I'm gonna take I'm gonna take the

0:45:19.080 --> 0:45:22.080
<v Speaker 1>uh the Broncos up the fifteen and a half. I

0:45:22.120 --> 0:45:24.480
<v Speaker 1>know it's not the you know, it's not the Stanford

0:45:24.520 --> 0:45:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Long model, but I think that Derek, they could keep

0:45:26.640 --> 0:45:29.200
<v Speaker 1>this game with it too. They've played awfully well. I mean,

0:45:29.760 --> 0:45:32.600
<v Speaker 1>look at the bad beats they've had and the games

0:45:32.640 --> 0:45:34.160
<v Speaker 1>they blew, and I mean, this could have been a

0:45:34.160 --> 0:45:36.960
<v Speaker 1>playoff team when we when we all said, oh, how right,

0:45:37.040 --> 0:45:39.640
<v Speaker 1>we all said how awful Bangio was and they had

0:45:39.640 --> 0:45:42.120
<v Speaker 1>no quarterback and their defense was a fraud and all

0:45:42.160 --> 0:45:46.160
<v Speaker 1>of that. So I'll take Bill's Broncos, Bills Broncos, So

0:45:46.280 --> 0:45:51.520
<v Speaker 1>Bill's Redskins followed by Bill's Broncos. Todd, I'm taking Bills too,

0:45:52.640 --> 0:45:57.239
<v Speaker 1>and um the other one, I'm gonna go with the

0:45:57.280 --> 0:46:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Dolphins because I just don't see Giants beating anybody by

0:46:01.600 --> 0:46:03.960
<v Speaker 1>more than nine and a half points. I know, again

0:46:03.960 --> 0:46:07.040
<v Speaker 1>it's probably not the best, umatically, but I'll just take

0:46:07.080 --> 0:46:11.080
<v Speaker 1>the Dolphins the nine and a half and Buffalo plus

0:46:11.120 --> 0:46:12.960
<v Speaker 1>the seven and a half. Well, it makes perfect sense

0:46:13.000 --> 0:46:15.120
<v Speaker 1>for me to take Bills Dolphins too, because after all,

0:46:15.120 --> 0:46:18.160
<v Speaker 1>those were my two, uh my first two best bets.

0:46:18.160 --> 0:46:20.000
<v Speaker 1>So it is Bills Dolphins for me. I will tell

0:46:20.000 --> 0:46:22.319
<v Speaker 1>you that the other ones I was considering to pair

0:46:22.440 --> 0:46:25.959
<v Speaker 1>with the Bills. One of them was Tonight's New York

0:46:26.080 --> 0:46:29.279
<v Speaker 1>Jets catching twenty three Like that was that was in

0:46:29.320 --> 0:46:32.799
<v Speaker 1>a consideration because, for God's sakes, it's twenty three for

0:46:32.880 --> 0:46:35.520
<v Speaker 1>no other reason, Uh, then that's just a mess of points.

0:46:35.560 --> 0:46:37.400
<v Speaker 1>But for my for me, officially, it's the Bills and

0:46:37.440 --> 0:46:39.719
<v Speaker 1>the Dolphins of Todd. We end up landing on the

0:46:39.760 --> 0:46:41.760
<v Speaker 1>exact same teaser. So I can't pick up any ground

0:46:41.760 --> 0:46:44.319
<v Speaker 1>on you there this week. But that's what I will

0:46:44.360 --> 0:46:48.000
<v Speaker 1>go with some guys to give my ten point teaser

0:46:48.000 --> 0:46:51.439
<v Speaker 1>because I've been hitting these three team ten point teasers. Lease,

0:46:51.760 --> 0:46:54.399
<v Speaker 1>you don't have them ready until Sunday morning, but I'm

0:46:54.480 --> 0:46:58.640
<v Speaker 1>considering New England just to win the game, Buffalo plus

0:46:58.640 --> 0:47:00.840
<v Speaker 1>eleven and a half and Lands just to win the

0:47:00.880 --> 0:47:04.840
<v Speaker 1>game for people who are interested in the ten point users,

0:47:04.920 --> 0:47:08.040
<v Speaker 1>not the Jets plus twenty seven. No, I'm just worried

0:47:08.040 --> 0:47:11.840
<v Speaker 1>they might lose. Uh, you know, I understand. It's a

0:47:11.880 --> 0:47:14.120
<v Speaker 1>definitely consideration. You know. I want to tip my hat

0:47:14.200 --> 0:47:17.239
<v Speaker 1>to Todd for actually letting the public know something he's

0:47:17.280 --> 0:47:19.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna play right other than the Tampa Bay over everything

0:47:20.000 --> 0:47:23.120
<v Speaker 1>else is in this supposition, here's actually something to eat bets,

0:47:23.160 --> 0:47:25.560
<v Speaker 1>So good for you. Well, you know what, that's really funny.

0:47:26.120 --> 0:47:28.120
<v Speaker 1>That's funny that you say that, Mikey, because I've been

0:47:28.120 --> 0:47:31.320
<v Speaker 1>putting up my in game picks every day on Twitter

0:47:31.440 --> 0:47:34.600
<v Speaker 1>and bashing the hell out of college basketball. So there,

0:47:35.120 --> 0:47:44.239
<v Speaker 1>Mr Palmist. These people are given enough for their life

0:47:44.239 --> 0:47:50.080
<v Speaker 1>to listen. Oh on the megapod, Paterson, don't be Paterson. Well,

0:47:50.120 --> 0:47:52.839
<v Speaker 1>here's the if I could get an extra half point,

0:47:52.920 --> 0:47:55.719
<v Speaker 1>it's not available anywhere in any market. Of course, I'd

0:47:55.760 --> 0:47:58.040
<v Speaker 1>be betting all these NFL games as well like you.

0:47:58.560 --> 0:48:04.520
<v Speaker 1>But um, yeah, the NFL, the NFL pregames are very difficult,

0:48:04.800 --> 0:48:07.560
<v Speaker 1>and I say you better be careful and play it

0:48:07.560 --> 0:48:09.839
<v Speaker 1>in game because they're just dangerous. We all know that.

0:48:10.239 --> 0:48:12.479
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I don't think I'm saying anything that's out

0:48:12.480 --> 0:48:15.000
<v Speaker 1>of line, am I. Gil. The correct word is pre flop.

0:48:15.160 --> 0:48:17.120
<v Speaker 1>That was what you were most out of line about, Todd,

0:48:17.400 --> 0:48:22.640
<v Speaker 1>correct word? Alright, Final two questions, boys, Final two questions,

0:48:22.640 --> 0:48:25.440
<v Speaker 1>And no, Todd, you weren't out of line. Final two questions.

0:48:25.440 --> 0:48:28.120
<v Speaker 1>I have been playing Tampa Bay over so, Mike. You know,

0:48:28.160 --> 0:48:29.759
<v Speaker 1>I know you ran out of the picture. But I

0:48:29.760 --> 0:48:35.000
<v Speaker 1>have been playing Tampa Bay over so go to hell, Mike. Derrick.

0:48:35.160 --> 0:48:37.680
<v Speaker 1>Derrick came in. He thought, Derek thought I read it

0:48:37.760 --> 0:48:39.560
<v Speaker 1>might be in trouble. He heard all the screaming and

0:48:39.640 --> 0:48:43.480
<v Speaker 1>he didn't know what was going on. So I I

0:48:43.560 --> 0:48:46.960
<v Speaker 1>love when we have actual casino moguls reacting to the

0:48:47.080 --> 0:48:52.479
<v Speaker 1>screaming on our podcast. Um Alright, final two questions, boys,

0:48:52.560 --> 0:48:54.279
<v Speaker 1>These have been the final two questions for years they

0:48:54.360 --> 0:48:56.680
<v Speaker 1>remain so. First one, which of the big favorites do

0:48:56.680 --> 0:48:58.319
<v Speaker 1>you believe is the most likely to lose? Out right?

0:48:58.400 --> 0:49:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Here are your candidates, Kamala Harris, no kidding. Baltimore minus

0:49:03.480 --> 0:49:06.880
<v Speaker 1>seventeen against the Jets Thursday night. That's the biggest spread

0:49:06.920 --> 0:49:09.200
<v Speaker 1>on the board. Kansas City nine and a half point

0:49:09.320 --> 0:49:16.240
<v Speaker 1>favorites against division rivals the Denver Broncos Um New England

0:49:16.880 --> 0:49:19.800
<v Speaker 1>nine and a half point favorites on the road against Cincinnata.

0:49:20.560 --> 0:49:22.920
<v Speaker 1>Should I put the two? Well, San Francisco ten and

0:49:22.920 --> 0:49:25.920
<v Speaker 1>a half point favorites or eleven eleven? It is at

0:49:25.960 --> 0:49:29.640
<v Speaker 1>home against Atlanta. God, these are big numbers. And then

0:49:29.680 --> 0:49:31.880
<v Speaker 1>there's New Orleans nine point favorites. All call it eight

0:49:31.880 --> 0:49:34.839
<v Speaker 1>and a half nine it's nine nine point favorites at

0:49:34.840 --> 0:49:37.840
<v Speaker 1>home against Indianapolis. I guess I don't have to include these, uh,

0:49:37.920 --> 0:49:39.440
<v Speaker 1>six and six and a half. So those are all

0:49:39.480 --> 0:49:42.400
<v Speaker 1>double digits, which is the most likely of all of

0:49:42.400 --> 0:49:44.480
<v Speaker 1>those who lose. Outright, There's a nine and a half

0:49:44.480 --> 0:49:46.880
<v Speaker 1>in there too, But which of those, Brady, Well, you know,

0:49:47.000 --> 0:49:50.920
<v Speaker 1>these are two of my bets, the Broncos and the Colts,

0:49:51.400 --> 0:49:54.759
<v Speaker 1>and I really think they both have opponents that come

0:49:54.840 --> 0:49:58.520
<v Speaker 1>into these games with tough situations, and I think both

0:49:58.560 --> 0:50:01.680
<v Speaker 1>could be beaten out right. I think one of the

0:50:01.719 --> 0:50:04.040
<v Speaker 1>two will hit, and I wouldn't be surprised if they

0:50:04.080 --> 0:50:07.200
<v Speaker 1>both did. Broncos and Colts, both of them. For me, Wow,

0:50:07.239 --> 0:50:10.440
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be surprised if both the Chiefs and the Saints

0:50:10.440 --> 0:50:13.640
<v Speaker 1>went down. Yeah, those are both a tick below double digits. Mike,

0:50:13.760 --> 0:50:18.120
<v Speaker 1>same question. Yeah, I gotta land on the Broncos here. Um,

0:50:18.160 --> 0:50:22.239
<v Speaker 1>they've played much better tough spot, Chiefs, Chez. If we

0:50:22.280 --> 0:50:23.960
<v Speaker 1>had told ourselves and like, if we go back to

0:50:23.960 --> 0:50:26.000
<v Speaker 1>our week four selves and tell us we'll be saying

0:50:26.000 --> 0:50:28.319
<v Speaker 1>these things about the Broncos, we would laugh at our

0:50:28.400 --> 0:50:30.120
<v Speaker 1>at ourselves today. But yet that's where we are with

0:50:30.160 --> 0:50:34.279
<v Speaker 1>the Broncos. Todd. I like Brady's Atlanta story. Atlanta went

0:50:34.320 --> 0:50:37.239
<v Speaker 1>into New Orleans and won that shocker. They still have

0:50:37.320 --> 0:50:39.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of talent. They are Gilly Ice, I mean,

0:50:39.680 --> 0:50:42.799
<v Speaker 1>Maddie Ice, a team with no mental fortitude. But you

0:50:42.880 --> 0:50:45.759
<v Speaker 1>never know. Once in a while, you know they could,

0:50:45.880 --> 0:50:48.320
<v Speaker 1>they could win one. I wouldn't be shocked if Atlanta

0:50:48.920 --> 0:50:51.759
<v Speaker 1>UH beat San Francisco. I happen to have a Colts

0:50:51.800 --> 0:50:56.640
<v Speaker 1>season under eight games winning ticket, and I'm very nervous

0:50:56.640 --> 0:50:59.120
<v Speaker 1>about the Colts beating New Orleans as well as I

0:50:59.120 --> 0:51:01.680
<v Speaker 1>think Brady's onto something there as well. It makes me

0:51:01.800 --> 0:51:03.840
<v Speaker 1>very nervous. I think it's the Colts. I think I

0:51:03.840 --> 0:51:06.560
<v Speaker 1>think it's the Saints. I think that's the one for me,

0:51:06.719 --> 0:51:09.600
<v Speaker 1>because all the others, like Baltimore is not losing to

0:51:09.680 --> 0:51:13.480
<v Speaker 1>the Jets. Listen, I get it about Denver, it's division rivals,

0:51:13.480 --> 0:51:15.960
<v Speaker 1>but it's still Drew Lock. And in Kansas City is

0:51:16.000 --> 0:51:19.120
<v Speaker 1>just there's too much offense there for the Broncos. In

0:51:19.120 --> 0:51:21.720
<v Speaker 1>my humble opinion, New England is not going to lose

0:51:21.760 --> 0:51:24.160
<v Speaker 1>to the Bengals. They're just not, whether they're on the

0:51:24.239 --> 0:51:26.200
<v Speaker 1>road or not. And then San Francisco to me, is

0:51:26.200 --> 0:51:28.239
<v Speaker 1>too good. I think it's the Colts. I think that's

0:51:28.280 --> 0:51:30.600
<v Speaker 1>the one sort of sneaky team. It's a very by low,

0:51:31.040 --> 0:51:32.800
<v Speaker 1>as we like to say on the Colts. They haven't

0:51:32.840 --> 0:51:36.160
<v Speaker 1>looked that good, but they squandered that fourteen point lead

0:51:36.280 --> 0:51:39.359
<v Speaker 1>at Tampa Bay. UH they've got it in them. And

0:51:39.400 --> 0:51:41.439
<v Speaker 1>I think, uh, you know a lot of these teams

0:51:41.480 --> 0:51:43.560
<v Speaker 1>in the NFC, which we've alluded to, the Packers being

0:51:43.560 --> 0:51:45.520
<v Speaker 1>one of them at ten and three, I think some

0:51:45.600 --> 0:51:48.160
<v Speaker 1>of these records are a little more gaudy than is

0:51:48.200 --> 0:51:50.120
<v Speaker 1>actually reflected in the skill set. So for me, it

0:51:50.120 --> 0:51:52.239
<v Speaker 1>would be New Orleans most likely the big favorites to

0:51:52.280 --> 0:51:54.200
<v Speaker 1>lose outright. That's a Monday night game and then the

0:51:54.200 --> 0:51:56.640
<v Speaker 1>final questions. We live in a bizarro world. No buys

0:51:56.680 --> 0:51:59.719
<v Speaker 1>their sixteen games. You're forced to bet aside Brady on

0:51:59.760 --> 0:52:02.280
<v Speaker 1>every single one of these, but you're allowed one free

0:52:02.280 --> 0:52:04.080
<v Speaker 1>pass on the side. What's the game you want? No

0:52:04.160 --> 0:52:09.000
<v Speaker 1>part of the Vikings at the Chargers. My friend I made.

0:52:09.160 --> 0:52:12.640
<v Speaker 1>I made Minnesota three point favorite, and I know it's

0:52:12.680 --> 0:52:15.400
<v Speaker 1>two and a half now, um, but I don't know

0:52:15.400 --> 0:52:18.160
<v Speaker 1>which team is gonna show up for either side. I

0:52:18.520 --> 0:52:21.480
<v Speaker 1>really like the Vikings against Seattle two weeks ago, and

0:52:21.520 --> 0:52:25.600
<v Speaker 1>their defense was awful in that game. Um, I think

0:52:25.640 --> 0:52:28.240
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota is the better team here. But we saw the

0:52:28.600 --> 0:52:32.600
<v Speaker 1>Chargers explode last week. Like Todd mentioned, we saw them

0:52:32.680 --> 0:52:36.800
<v Speaker 1>completely dominate Green Day. I could easily see Los Angeles

0:52:36.800 --> 0:52:39.400
<v Speaker 1>winning this game. I could easily see the Vikings just

0:52:39.600 --> 0:52:42.479
<v Speaker 1>rolling this team. I have no idea what's gonna happen.

0:52:42.520 --> 0:52:45.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm not getting involved. Yeah, we should almost name this question.

0:52:46.040 --> 0:52:49.920
<v Speaker 1>We should be sponsored by the Chargers. It's almost like

0:52:50.160 --> 0:52:52.880
<v Speaker 1>it's almost like they're the short list of possible answers

0:52:52.920 --> 0:52:55.960
<v Speaker 1>every week. Mikey, I'm gonna go with the fighting Kitchens

0:52:56.040 --> 0:52:59.320
<v Speaker 1>against the fighting Kingsbury's. I don't know what to make it.

0:52:59.400 --> 0:53:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland we the week. I don't know if the Cardinals

0:53:02.080 --> 0:53:04.880
<v Speaker 1>are we might have overvalued them a little bit because

0:53:04.880 --> 0:53:07.040
<v Speaker 1>of their run in the middle. No interested betting, no

0:53:07.160 --> 0:53:10.080
<v Speaker 1>interested in watching it. That is my answer to if

0:53:10.080 --> 0:53:13.080
<v Speaker 1>I may step in Cleveland, Arizona, I have no clue.

0:53:13.320 --> 0:53:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Kyler Murray scares me just enough, and Freddy Kitchens is

0:53:16.600 --> 0:53:20.759
<v Speaker 1>a buffoon. Dodd Dallas and the Rams. I don't know

0:53:20.840 --> 0:53:23.520
<v Speaker 1>what's going on with this Dallas team. Are they the

0:53:23.560 --> 0:53:26.560
<v Speaker 1>analytic Darling? Are they the garbage team we've seen the

0:53:26.640 --> 0:53:29.799
<v Speaker 1>last couple of weeks. The Rams played really well the

0:53:29.840 --> 0:53:32.440
<v Speaker 1>last couple of weeks, but prior to that they were horrible.

0:53:32.800 --> 0:53:35.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know about this these teams, so you know,

0:53:35.960 --> 0:53:37.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't want any part of it. I'm sure I'll

0:53:37.680 --> 0:53:39.759
<v Speaker 1>bet it in game. Alright, boys, we've done all we

0:53:39.760 --> 0:53:42.520
<v Speaker 1>can do. What is the distance in our overall records?

0:53:42.560 --> 0:53:45.680
<v Speaker 1>How far behind you guys? Am? I? Well, here you go.

0:53:45.760 --> 0:53:49.040
<v Speaker 1>You've got coming in. You've got Gil at eighteen twenty

0:53:49.160 --> 0:53:52.880
<v Speaker 1>three and one with a three and eleven teasers mark,

0:53:53.320 --> 0:53:57.120
<v Speaker 1>mikey eighteen and three in the lead with a five

0:53:57.160 --> 0:54:00.200
<v Speaker 1>eight and one teaser mark, and me at ninth teen

0:54:00.280 --> 0:54:03.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty two and one with a five and nine teaser marks.

0:54:03.080 --> 0:54:05.960
<v Speaker 1>So we're quite far behind Mr Michael with not many

0:54:06.000 --> 0:54:08.080
<v Speaker 1>weeks left, girls, so we have to make it up. Well,

0:54:08.080 --> 0:54:10.480
<v Speaker 1>no we're not. We're only like I'm the distance between

0:54:10.480 --> 0:54:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Mike and me is what three and a half games

0:54:12.960 --> 0:54:18.080
<v Speaker 1>in the whole thing on the lost column? But but

0:54:18.080 --> 0:54:20.320
<v Speaker 1>but three and a half overall? Yeah, he went lost

0:54:20.360 --> 0:54:23.280
<v Speaker 1>column on me? And what again? What are your teaser numbers? Again?

0:54:24.520 --> 0:54:27.640
<v Speaker 1>The teasers are five eight and one from Mike, five

0:54:27.680 --> 0:54:30.440
<v Speaker 1>and nine for me and three and eleven for you. God,

0:54:30.480 --> 0:54:32.960
<v Speaker 1>our teasers have been horrible, like the one thing that

0:54:33.080 --> 0:54:36.440
<v Speaker 1>is usually just the easiest. What a year for Stanford

0:54:36.480 --> 0:54:38.160
<v Speaker 1>while and teasers? All right, that's still very much in

0:54:38.160 --> 0:54:40.640
<v Speaker 1>contention to three weeks left in the regular season and

0:54:40.680 --> 0:54:44.040
<v Speaker 1>then the playoffs. Can't wait for that. Brady, Thank you.

0:54:44.080 --> 0:54:47.240
<v Speaker 1>Brady Cannon staple on the megapod year after year, always

0:54:47.239 --> 0:54:51.320
<v Speaker 1>the leadoff guy and the twenty eleven Las Vegas Hilton

0:54:51.440 --> 0:54:54.400
<v Speaker 1>Super Contest winner with Santacy. Thank you as always Brady

0:54:54.400 --> 0:54:58.880
<v Speaker 1>appreciated man. By the way, how many people were thank you? Uh?

0:54:58.880 --> 0:55:02.239
<v Speaker 1>Five hundred and seven and team It was kind of

0:55:02.280 --> 0:55:06.320
<v Speaker 1>the first year todd of of like a decent amount

0:55:06.320 --> 0:55:10.000
<v Speaker 1>of people. Uh, it's really kind of when the the

0:55:10.280 --> 0:55:13.719
<v Speaker 1>Contest really started to gain some popularity. Prior to that,

0:55:13.800 --> 0:55:16.480
<v Speaker 1>it was in the three hundreds and stuff. We got

0:55:16.520 --> 0:55:19.759
<v Speaker 1>up to five hundred and seventeen. And it was right

0:55:19.800 --> 0:55:24.200
<v Speaker 1>after that Contest victory that we had that Jake Cornegie

0:55:24.280 --> 0:55:27.320
<v Speaker 1>and I put our heads together and started Super Contest

0:55:27.400 --> 0:55:30.879
<v Speaker 1>Weekend and that's been running for like eight years now

0:55:30.960 --> 0:55:35.920
<v Speaker 1>or whatever, and the Contest has just grown exponentially ever since.

0:55:36.000 --> 0:55:37.920
<v Speaker 1>I think the next year it went to about seven

0:55:38.040 --> 0:55:40.920
<v Speaker 1>fifty and then it was eleven hundred and bang, here

0:55:40.960 --> 0:55:42.800
<v Speaker 1>we are at what what is it this year? Thirty

0:55:43.480 --> 0:55:45.800
<v Speaker 1>or something like that. Wow, do you miss the panels

0:55:45.840 --> 0:55:47.920
<v Speaker 1>for Super Contest Weekend? Brady, do you wish we had

0:55:47.960 --> 0:55:51.600
<v Speaker 1>those bas I do, yeah. I I think Decon should

0:55:51.640 --> 0:55:57.000
<v Speaker 1>be uh more involved, like largely more involved. I think,

0:55:57.160 --> 0:55:59.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, they should be there like around the clock

0:55:59.400 --> 0:56:03.000
<v Speaker 1>with program amming it, you know, the Saturday of Super

0:56:03.000 --> 0:56:06.279
<v Speaker 1>Contest weekend. And again, I'm sure I'll get with Jake

0:56:06.320 --> 0:56:09.360
<v Speaker 1>Hornegie here pretty soon and start talking about our plans

0:56:09.400 --> 0:56:12.440
<v Speaker 1>for next year. The Saturdays is good. You have the

0:56:12.440 --> 0:56:14.720
<v Speaker 1>golf tournament and then all the giveaways and the raffles

0:56:14.760 --> 0:56:17.520
<v Speaker 1>and all that stuff. That's fun, but the Friday has

0:56:17.560 --> 0:56:22.120
<v Speaker 1>started to die down, and I really enjoy the get

0:56:22.160 --> 0:56:24.800
<v Speaker 1>together in the camaraderie and seeing all these people that

0:56:24.920 --> 0:56:28.520
<v Speaker 1>I typically only see once a year that weekend around

0:56:28.520 --> 0:56:31.239
<v Speaker 1>the bar there at the Westgate and whatnot. But there

0:56:31.239 --> 0:56:33.640
<v Speaker 1>needs to be more. There needs to be a draw,

0:56:34.280 --> 0:56:37.480
<v Speaker 1>and that draw used to be the panel. Uh it

0:56:37.520 --> 0:56:40.120
<v Speaker 1>doesn't necessarily have to be a panel, but I think

0:56:40.239 --> 0:56:42.719
<v Speaker 1>Visa it needs to get involved in this discussion and

0:56:43.640 --> 0:56:46.319
<v Speaker 1>we need to throw, uh, you know, an event in

0:56:46.440 --> 0:56:49.680
<v Speaker 1>that Friday that makes it more attractive. We always talk

0:56:49.719 --> 0:56:52.120
<v Speaker 1>about you winning the Westgates Super Contest or the or

0:56:52.160 --> 0:56:55.920
<v Speaker 1>the Hilton Supercontess at the time Brady, and that obviously

0:56:55.920 --> 0:56:59.319
<v Speaker 1>I bury the headline. You are a visa host as well.

0:56:59.360 --> 0:57:01.680
<v Speaker 1>People should know you host the Green Zone on Sirius

0:57:01.800 --> 0:57:04.399
<v Speaker 1>XM channel two oh four. Uh. And you do so

0:57:04.920 --> 0:57:10.360
<v Speaker 1>six pm Pacific, nine pm Eastern. What days are you on, Brady?

0:57:10.440 --> 0:57:13.120
<v Speaker 1>I will be on there tonight. My week starts tonight.

0:57:13.280 --> 0:57:17.880
<v Speaker 1>I am Thursday and Friday at six pm. Saturday and

0:57:17.920 --> 0:57:21.160
<v Speaker 1>Sundays I do midday around two pm, and these are

0:57:21.200 --> 0:57:24.200
<v Speaker 1>Pacific times, and then I wrap around and come back

0:57:24.240 --> 0:57:27.520
<v Speaker 1>on Monday at six pm. So I'm off on Tuesdays

0:57:27.520 --> 0:57:30.920
<v Speaker 1>and Thursdays. Excuse me Tuesdays and Wednesdays. Forgive me for

0:57:30.960 --> 0:57:32.640
<v Speaker 1>having buried that headline. And of course for all your

0:57:32.680 --> 0:57:34.960
<v Speaker 1>golf needs in Las Vegas. For you and your buddies

0:57:34.960 --> 0:57:37.800
<v Speaker 1>are your bachelor parties. Brady's your guy at Tea Times USA.

0:57:37.840 --> 0:57:39.680
<v Speaker 1>How about that, Brady, We got that in there too. Yeah.

0:57:39.760 --> 0:57:42.520
<v Speaker 1>When I'm not, you know, babbling on visa and I'm

0:57:42.520 --> 0:57:44.959
<v Speaker 1>booking Tea Times. I try to hold down a couple

0:57:45.000 --> 0:57:47.680
<v Speaker 1>of jobs these days, babbling and booking Brady, That's what

0:57:47.720 --> 0:57:51.320
<v Speaker 1>we call him. Thank you, Brady, appreciate it. Man, Mikey Todd,

0:57:51.400 --> 0:57:53.600
<v Speaker 1>thank you. Thank you guys talking with all you guys.

0:57:53.640 --> 0:57:55.680
<v Speaker 1>Thank you guys for holding off the bickering to the

0:57:55.720 --> 0:57:57.680
<v Speaker 1>forty five minute mark but then really getting into it.

0:57:57.720 --> 0:58:00.760
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate that that's the hallmark this show this year.

0:58:01.080 --> 0:58:03.680
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, gentlemen. I was thinking that, you know, Brady

0:58:03.720 --> 0:58:06.120
<v Speaker 1>said he wants to make Fridays bigger at the weekend.

0:58:06.120 --> 0:58:08.360
<v Speaker 1>Maybe they could do a segment like an hour and

0:58:08.400 --> 0:58:11.240
<v Speaker 1>a half where Mike explains how to change the TV

0:58:11.440 --> 0:58:14.040
<v Speaker 1>channel as an active content manager at the bar at

0:58:14.040 --> 0:58:16.840
<v Speaker 1>the d So that would be very interesting. Here we go.

0:58:17.080 --> 0:58:19.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna vote for Pocahontas. You're not going to

0:58:19.920 --> 0:58:29.200
<v Speaker 1>vote for the wild tax. And on that note, thank

0:58:29.200 --> 0:58:33.320
<v Speaker 1>you Orange, Mike Palm, thank you Orange Pom. Good luck

0:58:33.360 --> 0:58:35.400
<v Speaker 1>with all your Week fifteen pets in the NFL.