WEBVTT - Trade War Impact on Consumers 

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. This is the Bloomberg

0:00:13.840 --> 0:00:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Surveillance Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at seven am Eastern

0:00:18.200 --> 0:00:22.000
<v Speaker 1>on Apple CarPlay or Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app.

0:00:22.360 --> 0:00:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts, or watch

0:00:25.760 --> 0:00:27.000
<v Speaker 1>us live on YouTube.

0:00:27.160 --> 0:00:30.240
<v Speaker 2>Themandalignum with us here right now, peat a credit research

0:00:30.320 --> 0:00:32.280
<v Speaker 2>black Rock. We're thrilled that she's with us. We do

0:00:32.320 --> 0:00:35.440
<v Speaker 2>an audible at right now, long ago and far away,

0:00:35.720 --> 0:00:39.920
<v Speaker 2>like think eighteen forty two, there was the Augustinian College

0:00:40.000 --> 0:00:43.960
<v Speaker 2>of Villanova. Wander forward to the class of seventy seven

0:00:44.000 --> 0:00:46.560
<v Speaker 2>and the math guy got out of it and ended

0:00:46.640 --> 0:00:49.960
<v Speaker 2>up the other day becoming Pope Leo. I believe the

0:00:50.040 --> 0:00:54.440
<v Speaker 2>fourteenth Amandolinum. Are you going to move? I mean, I

0:00:54.560 --> 0:00:57.040
<v Speaker 2>know that mister Fink would let he would let you go.

0:00:57.520 --> 0:01:00.000
<v Speaker 2>Do we look for you to do a Bloomberg Surveillance

0:01:00.120 --> 0:01:04.560
<v Speaker 2>interview from the Administration of the Patrimony of the Apostolic

0:01:04.720 --> 0:01:06.120
<v Speaker 2>See anytime soon.

0:01:06.240 --> 0:01:06.960
<v Speaker 3>I would welcome it.

0:01:07.040 --> 0:01:09.760
<v Speaker 4>I'm a massive supporter of the school. Was hoping for

0:01:09.840 --> 0:01:13.200
<v Speaker 4>some divine intervention last night, but it didn't didn't work

0:01:13.200 --> 0:01:13.680
<v Speaker 4>out that way.

0:01:13.720 --> 0:01:15.240
<v Speaker 3>But I love Villanova.

0:01:15.440 --> 0:01:18.039
<v Speaker 2>What I have to ask what was I mean, I

0:01:18.120 --> 0:01:21.520
<v Speaker 2>was watching with missus Keane like everyone at else. What

0:01:21.720 --> 0:01:24.880
<v Speaker 2>was it like when he stepped out on that belt.

0:01:25.520 --> 0:01:27.520
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I've been a massive supporter of the school,

0:01:27.560 --> 0:01:28.840
<v Speaker 4>but it was just so wonderful to see I was

0:01:28.880 --> 0:01:30.800
<v Speaker 4>actually quite surprised. I think others of the school said

0:01:30.840 --> 0:01:32.520
<v Speaker 4>the same thing, even those who were in the loop.

0:01:33.200 --> 0:01:35.440
<v Speaker 3>But it's it's super exciting for all of us.

0:01:35.680 --> 0:01:38.240
<v Speaker 2>Very good. Well, we look forward to speaking to you

0:01:38.319 --> 0:01:43.240
<v Speaker 2>from the administration of the Patrimony of the Apostolics, the Pope.

0:01:43.319 --> 0:01:44.559
<v Speaker 2>What's his favorite chief steak?

0:01:44.640 --> 0:01:46.800
<v Speaker 3>I mean, that's got to be one of the most

0:01:46.840 --> 0:01:47.800
<v Speaker 3>support thing.

0:01:47.880 --> 0:01:51.360
<v Speaker 2>What's what's the most important advice to the Administration of

0:01:51.400 --> 0:01:55.360
<v Speaker 2>the Patrimony of the Apostolic see and their bond portfolio?

0:01:55.400 --> 0:01:57.080
<v Speaker 2>Will it be price up eeled out?

0:01:57.200 --> 0:01:59.120
<v Speaker 3>Good morning? I should say thank you for having me.

0:01:59.640 --> 0:02:02.800
<v Speaker 4>I think one of the most important things I would

0:02:02.800 --> 0:02:06.640
<v Speaker 4>emphasize is maybe the concept of two sided risks has

0:02:06.720 --> 0:02:07.920
<v Speaker 4>really come into focus.

0:02:08.480 --> 0:02:10.400
<v Speaker 3>I would say more over the past few weeks.

0:02:10.440 --> 0:02:15.320
<v Speaker 4>It actually started before the US China trade paused tensions

0:02:15.600 --> 0:02:17.679
<v Speaker 4>of a couple of weeks ago. But I think when

0:02:17.680 --> 0:02:20.800
<v Speaker 4>we're talking to investors there's also a focus on what

0:02:20.919 --> 0:02:24.440
<v Speaker 4>could go right, and I think the fact pattern over

0:02:24.480 --> 0:02:26.440
<v Speaker 4>the past few days was case in point Friday, we

0:02:26.520 --> 0:02:27.919
<v Speaker 4>left it was a bit of a risk on tone.

0:02:27.960 --> 0:02:30.960
<v Speaker 4>We came in yesterday, quite a risk on tone. Corporates

0:02:30.960 --> 0:02:33.160
<v Speaker 4>investors alike don't want to be caught off sides, and

0:02:33.200 --> 0:02:35.160
<v Speaker 4>so I think there's just a recognition of the two

0:02:35.200 --> 0:02:38.480
<v Speaker 4>sided risks. We are actually comfortable selectively moving down in

0:02:38.520 --> 0:02:40.639
<v Speaker 4>credit quality. That's a view that we've had for a while,

0:02:41.400 --> 0:02:43.960
<v Speaker 4>and I think that is actually we're an investor that

0:02:44.080 --> 0:02:46.480
<v Speaker 4>is taking a bit of a longer term perspective. Compounding

0:02:46.480 --> 0:02:48.880
<v Speaker 4>these spreads and yields. I think it's a pretty attractive opportunity.

0:02:49.000 --> 0:02:50.840
<v Speaker 5>So I'm looking at just at the end go function

0:02:50.919 --> 0:02:53.000
<v Speaker 5>of Bloombergate next browser, just kind of look ato where

0:02:53.120 --> 0:02:56.919
<v Speaker 5>things are going in fixed income here. Corporate high yield

0:02:56.919 --> 0:02:59.200
<v Speaker 5>has been like the best performer two point four to

0:02:59.200 --> 0:03:00.919
<v Speaker 5>six percent total return year to date.

0:03:01.120 --> 0:03:01.320
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:03:01.520 --> 0:03:04.639
<v Speaker 5>I mean again, it seems like the market's willing to

0:03:04.680 --> 0:03:05.360
<v Speaker 5>take credit risks.

0:03:05.400 --> 0:03:07.880
<v Speaker 4>Yes, and I think it's notable on a few fronts

0:03:08.000 --> 0:03:11.600
<v Speaker 4>high yield out performing IG in an environment like this

0:03:11.639 --> 0:03:14.800
<v Speaker 4>where there are some residual concerns about growth downside risks,

0:03:14.840 --> 0:03:16.960
<v Speaker 4>and also an expectation that we are slowing from an

0:03:16.960 --> 0:03:17.720
<v Speaker 4>above trend pace.

0:03:17.840 --> 0:03:20.840
<v Speaker 3>I think that's really twofold Paul. One is you're still.

0:03:20.639 --> 0:03:24.600
<v Speaker 4>Able to capture a pretty attractive incremental spread in high yield.

0:03:24.840 --> 0:03:28.440
<v Speaker 4>You don't have as much duration exposure, so when treasure

0:03:28.480 --> 0:03:31.160
<v Speaker 4>yields sell off, you're less impacted in the high old space.

0:03:31.360 --> 0:03:34.560
<v Speaker 4>And then two, importantly, fundamentals between a lot of these

0:03:34.600 --> 0:03:36.040
<v Speaker 4>pockets of the market have converged.

0:03:36.080 --> 0:03:37.800
<v Speaker 3>Actually, if you look at leverage for.

0:03:37.800 --> 0:03:39.840
<v Speaker 4>Double b's, which is the high end of high yield,

0:03:40.200 --> 0:03:42.960
<v Speaker 4>and leverage for triple b's, the low end of investment grade, they're.

0:03:42.760 --> 0:03:45.200
<v Speaker 3>Actually the same. You can see that on the Bloomberg terminal, So.

0:03:45.160 --> 0:03:47.200
<v Speaker 4>That you're not giving up a ton of credit quality

0:03:47.240 --> 0:03:49.560
<v Speaker 4>to move down. They're not giving up a ton in

0:03:49.760 --> 0:03:51.720
<v Speaker 4>fundamental quality to move down in credit quality.

0:03:51.720 --> 0:03:52.200
<v Speaker 6>And we like that.

0:03:52.320 --> 0:03:55.200
<v Speaker 2>See how she pitched the Bloomberg terminal. Let's have her back.

0:03:55.240 --> 0:03:58.760
<v Speaker 5>She knows who listens here. So what's the thought here

0:03:58.800 --> 0:04:01.320
<v Speaker 5>about this Federal Reserve? Again on earlier doesn't think there's

0:04:01.320 --> 0:04:02.400
<v Speaker 5>gonna be a rake cut this year.

0:04:02.600 --> 0:04:05.360
<v Speaker 4>It seems like the Fed officials are priming the market

0:04:05.520 --> 0:04:08.480
<v Speaker 4>to expect really nothing until September at the earliest.

0:04:09.120 --> 0:04:10.520
<v Speaker 3>That the commentary from the.

0:04:10.520 --> 0:04:13.080
<v Speaker 4>Past, I would say several days suggests that I think

0:04:13.120 --> 0:04:16.440
<v Speaker 4>that makes sense if you remove some of the downside

0:04:16.520 --> 0:04:18.960
<v Speaker 4>risks to growth. So we take kind of that left

0:04:18.960 --> 0:04:21.560
<v Speaker 4>tail recessionary case off the table, which we believe we've done,

0:04:21.560 --> 0:04:24.479
<v Speaker 4>and really we weren't expecting a recession anyway, and you

0:04:24.520 --> 0:04:25.719
<v Speaker 4>have above target inflation.

0:04:26.440 --> 0:04:27.160
<v Speaker 3>The urgency and.

0:04:27.080 --> 0:04:29.279
<v Speaker 4>The impetus for the Fed to act preemptively, we think

0:04:29.360 --> 0:04:30.120
<v Speaker 4>is pretty low.

0:04:30.360 --> 0:04:33.479
<v Speaker 2>Fold In we just had Jordan Rochester. I'm brilliant at

0:04:33.520 --> 0:04:40.159
<v Speaker 2>Missoul fold in what the Japanese angst and the indications

0:04:40.360 --> 0:04:44.960
<v Speaker 2>of Pacific rim week dollar angst, what it means for

0:04:45.120 --> 0:04:48.720
<v Speaker 2>full faith and credit investors in the United States. Are

0:04:48.720 --> 0:04:50.440
<v Speaker 2>they linked or are they separate?

0:04:50.680 --> 0:04:52.320
<v Speaker 3>Well, they are linked in some ways.

0:04:52.320 --> 0:04:56.200
<v Speaker 4>That foreign investors own around twenty plus twenty five percent

0:04:56.279 --> 0:04:57.000
<v Speaker 4>of the US.

0:04:56.760 --> 0:04:59.320
<v Speaker 3>Corporate bond market. Does walk away from that, no, I

0:04:59.320 --> 0:04:59.920
<v Speaker 3>think they are.

0:05:00.120 --> 0:05:03.200
<v Speaker 4>Conversations suggest that actually it's just the marginal dollar that

0:05:03.240 --> 0:05:05.640
<v Speaker 4>has a better chance of being deployed at home in

0:05:05.680 --> 0:05:09.080
<v Speaker 4>some of these markets where we're expecting either in Europe,

0:05:09.080 --> 0:05:12.760
<v Speaker 4>for example, fiscal to result in increased sovereign issue ines

0:05:13.000 --> 0:05:15.680
<v Speaker 4>higher yields that maybe weren't available in some of these

0:05:15.720 --> 0:05:17.200
<v Speaker 4>regions for the past several years.

0:05:17.240 --> 0:05:18.200
<v Speaker 3>They're now on offer.

0:05:18.440 --> 0:05:21.680
<v Speaker 4>And so I think corporates, for the incremental dollar are saying, Okay,

0:05:21.960 --> 0:05:24.520
<v Speaker 4>should I be a bit more geographically diversified. That's what

0:05:24.560 --> 0:05:27.680
<v Speaker 4>we're sensing in our conversations, not a wholesale reallocation, but

0:05:27.720 --> 0:05:29.680
<v Speaker 4>for the marginal dollars, should I deploy that at home?

0:05:30.400 --> 0:05:34.120
<v Speaker 5>So again the credit quality outlook here, I mean, if

0:05:34.120 --> 0:05:36.839
<v Speaker 5>we're not heading for a recession, do we have to

0:05:36.839 --> 0:05:38.760
<v Speaker 5>worry about credit quality in general?

0:05:38.760 --> 0:05:38.920
<v Speaker 2>Though?

0:05:38.960 --> 0:05:42.560
<v Speaker 5>Because it seems like, you know, the teriff rights are

0:05:42.720 --> 0:05:45.120
<v Speaker 5>materially higher than they were at the start the year.

0:05:45.160 --> 0:05:47.320
<v Speaker 5>It's got to impact growth from a lot of companies.

0:05:47.360 --> 0:05:48.719
<v Speaker 3>It's a great point. I think we are.

0:05:48.960 --> 0:05:52.000
<v Speaker 4>We are watching pockets of the various asset classes that

0:05:52.040 --> 0:05:54.960
<v Speaker 4>we track that we're under pressure even when growth was

0:05:55.000 --> 0:05:57.560
<v Speaker 4>above trend. So for example, parts of commercial real estate,

0:05:57.720 --> 0:05:59.960
<v Speaker 4>parts of corporate credit, both on the liquid and private

0:06:00.040 --> 0:06:03.360
<v Speaker 4>credit side, parts of the consumer right subprime. These were

0:06:03.400 --> 0:06:06.480
<v Speaker 4>areas that were already under pressure when growth was above trend.

0:06:06.839 --> 0:06:09.240
<v Speaker 4>Now that we're expecting a more challenging growth inflation mix.

0:06:09.279 --> 0:06:12.279
<v Speaker 4>There's really nothing on the horizon that expects us to

0:06:12.360 --> 0:06:14.920
<v Speaker 4>see those companies kind of reverse their fortunes and kind

0:06:14.960 --> 0:06:18.520
<v Speaker 4>of really improve those fundamentals. So that's where we are focused.

0:06:18.520 --> 0:06:22.599
<v Speaker 4>It's more dispersion, not widespread market disruption, So those tales

0:06:22.640 --> 0:06:24.800
<v Speaker 4>of the market are really where we're focused. It really

0:06:24.920 --> 0:06:26.640
<v Speaker 4>underscores the importance of granularity.

0:06:27.320 --> 0:06:29.680
<v Speaker 2>This is a way from your remit, but the ETF

0:06:30.640 --> 0:06:32.920
<v Speaker 2>you know, and of course led by black Rock. Obviously,

0:06:33.400 --> 0:06:36.359
<v Speaker 2>the flows into ETFs I think have surprised me and

0:06:36.400 --> 0:06:40.080
<v Speaker 2>Paul both inequities advance. Are you surprised that money needs

0:06:40.120 --> 0:06:43.320
<v Speaker 2>to find a warm place here given all the political.

0:06:42.800 --> 0:06:45.159
<v Speaker 3>Diversion, I would say yes.

0:06:45.200 --> 0:06:47.760
<v Speaker 4>The flows even in if you look at just regular

0:06:47.839 --> 0:06:50.240
<v Speaker 4>mutual fund flows, even in high yield, over the past

0:06:50.240 --> 0:06:52.680
<v Speaker 4>few weeks, they've rebounded pretty nicely. Keep in mind, though

0:06:52.720 --> 0:06:55.480
<v Speaker 4>those fun flows only capture a portion of the market.

0:06:55.520 --> 0:06:59.359
<v Speaker 4>They're not capturing the entire investor base that's in corporate credit.

0:06:59.400 --> 0:07:01.760
<v Speaker 4>And actually you can see it in the spread reactions

0:07:02.200 --> 0:07:04.839
<v Speaker 4>that there is these white These moments of widening have

0:07:04.920 --> 0:07:06.960
<v Speaker 4>been short lived because that money is coming in.

0:07:07.320 --> 0:07:11.280
<v Speaker 2>Did you watch Jalen Brunson at Villanova of course like Arena.

0:07:11.920 --> 0:07:12.880
<v Speaker 3>No, no, we were.

0:07:12.880 --> 0:07:14.800
<v Speaker 4>We were not there at the same time, but I

0:07:14.880 --> 0:07:17.440
<v Speaker 4>watched him when he was at Villanova when I was out.

0:07:18.120 --> 0:07:20.760
<v Speaker 4>Was he yeah, the whole Yeah, I mean the whole

0:07:20.760 --> 0:07:24.600
<v Speaker 4>team is just like, I think, a masterclass in execution

0:07:24.680 --> 0:07:27.360
<v Speaker 4>when they were at Villanova and Jay Wright was wonderful obviously,

0:07:27.520 --> 0:07:29.320
<v Speaker 4>and that's the thing, and they were all together.

0:07:29.600 --> 0:07:32.680
<v Speaker 5>Coach, I'm gonna call my relatively young coach, middle aged

0:07:32.720 --> 0:07:35.600
<v Speaker 5>coach this whole nil thing the transfer portal, he said,

0:07:35.600 --> 0:07:37.800
<v Speaker 5>I'm at it.

0:07:37.040 --> 0:07:40.080
<v Speaker 2>The one year, two years Brunson played three or four years.

0:07:40.080 --> 0:07:42.720
<v Speaker 5>I see, yeah, So, I mean that's Jay Writ's one

0:07:42.760 --> 0:07:44.520
<v Speaker 5>of a handful of great, great coaches.

0:07:44.800 --> 0:07:47.240
<v Speaker 2>I'm not I lift up Shack today just because I

0:07:47.240 --> 0:07:50.559
<v Speaker 2>thought he was hilarious just today doing the bicep curl

0:07:50.600 --> 0:07:52.920
<v Speaker 2>with a guy. You know, he picked up a guy

0:07:53.360 --> 0:07:56.160
<v Speaker 2>and was doing a bicep curl. And again Shack played

0:07:56.160 --> 0:07:59.240
<v Speaker 2>three four years. Yep, I know they ruined the game.

0:07:59.320 --> 0:07:59.480
<v Speaker 6>Huh.

0:08:00.120 --> 0:08:03.000
<v Speaker 2>It's it's okay. They ruin the game, Miss Wyman.

0:08:03.520 --> 0:08:06.480
<v Speaker 4>I enjoyed it even I enjoyed watching them, even though

0:08:06.520 --> 0:08:07.840
<v Speaker 4>they come wasn't what we wanted.

0:08:08.160 --> 0:08:11.240
<v Speaker 2>Whose Whose tickets do you get for tomorrow night?

0:08:11.680 --> 0:08:13.040
<v Speaker 3>Nobody's tickets. I just.

0:08:15.760 --> 0:08:17.200
<v Speaker 5>Salesperson.

0:08:17.240 --> 0:08:19.040
<v Speaker 2>I've got to take golden tickets somewhere.

0:08:19.400 --> 0:08:22.160
<v Speaker 3>Takes Maybe after today, maybe I'll have something.

0:08:22.160 --> 0:08:22.560
<v Speaker 7>I don't know.

0:08:23.360 --> 0:08:27.000
<v Speaker 2>She's available in New York Wall Street for tomorrow, Amanda

0:08:27.080 --> 0:08:29.720
<v Speaker 2>Light And thank you, Thank you, particularly thank you for

0:08:29.800 --> 0:08:34.640
<v Speaker 2>those comments on the Augustitian College of the Villanova. Greatly

0:08:34.679 --> 0:08:35.439
<v Speaker 2>appreciate that.

0:08:41.280 --> 0:08:44.840
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Catch us live

0:08:44.920 --> 0:08:48.080
<v Speaker 1>weekday afternoons from seven to ten am Eastern. Listen on

0:08:48.160 --> 0:08:51.840
<v Speaker 1>Applecarplay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app, or

0:08:51.960 --> 0:08:53.520
<v Speaker 1>watch us live on YouTube.

0:08:53.640 --> 0:08:56.520
<v Speaker 2>He's really something. He's at Missouli with Dom Constant and

0:08:56.520 --> 0:09:00.840
<v Speaker 2>Steve Hudo, Jordan Rochester Holtz Court in London, and all

0:09:00.880 --> 0:09:03.720
<v Speaker 2>I can say is there's sort of these distant articles

0:09:03.880 --> 0:09:07.199
<v Speaker 2>of people from the West writing about Japan and they

0:09:07.240 --> 0:09:10.439
<v Speaker 2>cite the numbers and there's real anks. It's priced down,

0:09:10.600 --> 0:09:14.679
<v Speaker 2>yield up and then out on LinkedIn, where he's brilliant.

0:09:14.760 --> 0:09:17.120
<v Speaker 2>And also of course all of his research from a zoo.

0:09:18.000 --> 0:09:22.800
<v Speaker 2>There's this absolute authority from Jordan Rochester of what it

0:09:22.920 --> 0:09:29.480
<v Speaker 2>means when long term Japanese paper goes lower price, higher yield,

0:09:29.600 --> 0:09:33.160
<v Speaker 2>including the forty year piece Jordan. Let's start with a

0:09:33.240 --> 0:09:37.920
<v Speaker 2>why why is it priced down yield up for Japanese

0:09:38.000 --> 0:09:38.840
<v Speaker 2>long term debt?

0:09:39.800 --> 0:09:42.120
<v Speaker 8>Well, it's a mixture of things, Tom good Morning. The

0:09:42.160 --> 0:09:44.520
<v Speaker 8>main thing is because the Bank Japan is in a

0:09:44.600 --> 0:09:47.680
<v Speaker 8>hiking cycle. So typically at the very start of a

0:09:47.760 --> 0:09:49.920
<v Speaker 8>rate hiking cycle, when you're leaving the.

0:09:50.000 --> 0:09:52.240
<v Speaker 6>Zero lower bounds is what Japan's been doing.

0:09:52.679 --> 0:09:55.240
<v Speaker 8>The long end does sell off as markets price in

0:09:55.360 --> 0:09:58.400
<v Speaker 8>a higher risk of higher rates for longer and that's

0:09:58.440 --> 0:10:01.360
<v Speaker 8>what happened with the ECB's example, when they escaped Qi

0:10:02.040 --> 0:10:04.560
<v Speaker 8>in twenty seventeen. When they did that, you saw a

0:10:04.600 --> 0:10:07.560
<v Speaker 8>big steepening in the curve in Europe, and that's been

0:10:07.600 --> 0:10:10.160
<v Speaker 8>what's happening in Japan. The other part of it as well,

0:10:10.320 --> 0:10:13.560
<v Speaker 8>is because of the life insurance and pension funds demand

0:10:13.600 --> 0:10:17.599
<v Speaker 8>for the long end being softer. That's because their liabilities

0:10:17.640 --> 0:10:20.240
<v Speaker 8>are getting smaller as interstrates a rising this kind of

0:10:20.280 --> 0:10:22.720
<v Speaker 8>the mathematics of a pension fund. And the third reason

0:10:23.280 --> 0:10:26.959
<v Speaker 8>is much more higher foreign participation in Japan's long end,

0:10:27.080 --> 0:10:30.400
<v Speaker 8>which isn't great to see because it does invite more

0:10:30.480 --> 0:10:34.000
<v Speaker 8>qualtity and speculation than previously, which was more of a

0:10:34.040 --> 0:10:36.439
<v Speaker 8>domestically owned market. We've actually seen a lot of hedge

0:10:36.440 --> 0:10:39.440
<v Speaker 8>funds and foreign real money move into that space.

0:10:40.320 --> 0:10:42.920
<v Speaker 2>I look sure Damian SSR has been a huge value

0:10:43.000 --> 0:10:48.720
<v Speaker 2>add weak Taiwan dollar, Singapore dollar even rolling over in others.

0:10:49.320 --> 0:10:53.880
<v Speaker 2>Measure the contagion of the Japanese challenge and what it

0:10:53.960 --> 0:10:57.200
<v Speaker 2>means for other Pacific room countries, and of course what

0:10:57.240 --> 0:11:00.000
<v Speaker 2>it means for the United States.

0:11:00.000 --> 0:11:01.920
<v Speaker 8>Sometimes when we talk about the US or Europe, we

0:11:01.920 --> 0:11:04.040
<v Speaker 8>talk about the bubble. We don't think about what's happening

0:11:04.040 --> 0:11:06.240
<v Speaker 8>outside that will feed through, and Japan is a clear

0:11:06.280 --> 0:11:08.920
<v Speaker 8>one for that. The yen has been the carry trade

0:11:08.920 --> 0:11:12.800
<v Speaker 8>funder of the past two decades, and that applies to

0:11:12.880 --> 0:11:15.640
<v Speaker 8>the front end and also the long end. Borrowing in

0:11:15.720 --> 0:11:18.319
<v Speaker 8>Japan at low rates and investing that in the US

0:11:18.800 --> 0:11:22.400
<v Speaker 8>at higher rates of return. Well, now domestic rates are

0:11:22.480 --> 0:11:24.800
<v Speaker 8>rising in Japan. You have to have either a higher

0:11:24.880 --> 0:11:27.240
<v Speaker 8>rate of return through investment in the US. So therefore

0:11:27.240 --> 0:11:30.200
<v Speaker 8>it means US fixed income will underperform and rates will

0:11:30.240 --> 0:11:33.280
<v Speaker 8>go higher in the US, or you need essentially to

0:11:33.360 --> 0:11:35.800
<v Speaker 8>move that money back to Japan, and you're having a

0:11:35.800 --> 0:11:38.680
<v Speaker 8>mixture of both, and that's leading to the yen strength.

0:11:38.679 --> 0:11:40.800
<v Speaker 8>We're looking for one thirty eight in dollar end by

0:11:40.840 --> 0:11:43.600
<v Speaker 8>the year end, down towards one thirty six or lower

0:11:43.720 --> 0:11:45.320
<v Speaker 8>when we get to March, and that's because of the

0:11:45.320 --> 0:11:48.760
<v Speaker 8>Boj's hiking cycle mainly, but it's also because of this

0:11:48.960 --> 0:11:50.560
<v Speaker 8>de dollarization.

0:11:49.960 --> 0:11:51.520
<v Speaker 6>Story as well as playing in the background.

0:11:51.679 --> 0:11:54.880
<v Speaker 8>I don't want to overemphasize that the dollarization story, it's

0:11:54.880 --> 0:11:58.360
<v Speaker 8>not sell America. But what we are talking about is

0:11:58.400 --> 0:12:00.599
<v Speaker 8>the rest of the world outperforming the US and the

0:12:00.640 --> 0:12:01.560
<v Speaker 8>second half this year.

0:12:02.240 --> 0:12:05.559
<v Speaker 5>So again you mentioned the dollar and the Bloomberg Dollar

0:12:05.640 --> 0:12:08.760
<v Speaker 5>indexes down, you know, almost eight percent from its recent high.

0:12:08.760 --> 0:12:12.079
<v Speaker 5>Here cannot seem to find a bid. While US equities

0:12:12.080 --> 0:12:15.480
<v Speaker 5>have rebounded most of the sell off they saw earlier

0:12:15.640 --> 0:12:18.800
<v Speaker 5>this year. What's your six to twelve month view of

0:12:18.840 --> 0:12:19.480
<v Speaker 5>the US dollar.

0:12:20.920 --> 0:12:22.840
<v Speaker 8>In the short term, I'll actually be a buyer of

0:12:22.840 --> 0:12:25.600
<v Speaker 8>the dollar because I think that the trade has got

0:12:25.640 --> 0:12:27.800
<v Speaker 8>a little bit ahead of itself. We're looking for one

0:12:27.960 --> 0:12:30.600
<v Speaker 8>twenty euro dollars, so there's still more room to go,

0:12:30.960 --> 0:12:33.480
<v Speaker 8>but we've already rallied quite significantly, and in cable we're

0:12:33.480 --> 0:12:36.760
<v Speaker 8>already out one thirty six to for year end, for example.

0:12:37.080 --> 0:12:39.600
<v Speaker 8>But long term it's I think what we're going to

0:12:39.640 --> 0:12:42.040
<v Speaker 8>see is a reaction to the tariffs in Q three

0:12:42.040 --> 0:12:44.520
<v Speaker 8>and Q four from Japan, from Europe and the rest

0:12:44.559 --> 0:12:47.679
<v Speaker 8>of the world, including China, fiscal STEAMNUS will come down

0:12:47.720 --> 0:12:51.679
<v Speaker 8>the pipeline reform in an effort to boost growth. Because

0:12:51.679 --> 0:12:53.920
<v Speaker 8>the US tariffs will hit the rest of the world growth,

0:12:54.280 --> 0:12:56.680
<v Speaker 8>those countries will have to respond in their own way,

0:12:57.000 --> 0:12:59.760
<v Speaker 8>and that will lead to expectations of growth picking up

0:12:59.760 --> 0:13:01.760
<v Speaker 8>for next year. So it's kind of a down and

0:13:01.840 --> 0:13:04.160
<v Speaker 8>up for the growth outlook, I think for the rest

0:13:04.160 --> 0:13:05.960
<v Speaker 8>of the world, and that's why we have the dollar

0:13:06.040 --> 0:13:07.920
<v Speaker 8>un performing because typically when the rest of the world

0:13:07.960 --> 0:13:11.240
<v Speaker 8>does fiscal reforms and picks up, the dollar weekends in

0:13:11.280 --> 0:13:13.960
<v Speaker 8>that environment. But short term, I think everybody short the dollar.

0:13:13.960 --> 0:13:15.560
<v Speaker 8>I think every guest on here will probably tell you

0:13:15.600 --> 0:13:17.520
<v Speaker 8>that there's very few out there pushing.

0:13:17.240 --> 0:13:17.840
<v Speaker 6>For long dollar.

0:13:18.080 --> 0:13:20.920
<v Speaker 8>And we are starting to see the normal correlations of

0:13:21.040 --> 0:13:23.920
<v Speaker 8>foreign exchange to interest rates picking back up, and at

0:13:23.920 --> 0:13:26.040
<v Speaker 8>the moment they say the dollar's fair value, and I

0:13:26.160 --> 0:13:27.959
<v Speaker 8>just worry that everyone's got the same trade on.

0:13:28.640 --> 0:13:31.840
<v Speaker 5>Rest of world what's the best rest of world trade

0:13:31.920 --> 0:13:33.640
<v Speaker 5>right here visa VI the dollar.

0:13:33.679 --> 0:13:37.480
<v Speaker 8>Do you think, well, the euro is the one which

0:13:37.520 --> 0:13:38.840
<v Speaker 8>stands out because of Germany.

0:13:38.840 --> 0:13:40.640
<v Speaker 6>I mean, just look at their defense sector.

0:13:40.720 --> 0:13:44.120
<v Speaker 8>Ryan Metal and a few other names just extremely outperforming

0:13:44.920 --> 0:13:47.160
<v Speaker 8>of our names within their sector. And that's because the

0:13:47.200 --> 0:13:50.160
<v Speaker 8>German fiscal taps have been turned on, the debt break

0:13:50.200 --> 0:13:53.280
<v Speaker 8>has been reformed. So that's where I'd be looking for Sterling.

0:13:53.280 --> 0:13:56.000
<v Speaker 8>I'm less interested in and the Yen. Of course, we're

0:13:56.160 --> 0:13:58.720
<v Speaker 8>bigger players of rates and we think that the yen

0:13:58.760 --> 0:13:59.800
<v Speaker 8>will strengthen.

0:14:00.160 --> 0:14:02.960
<v Speaker 2>Ester with us in London with Missoul can't say enough

0:14:03.000 --> 0:14:06.000
<v Speaker 2>about their research improvement over the last four or five

0:14:06.080 --> 0:14:10.080
<v Speaker 2>six years. Stephen Rushudo guide in the ship, dom constant

0:14:11.120 --> 0:14:14.719
<v Speaker 2>writing brilliant research in Jordan Rochester with them as well.

0:14:14.800 --> 0:14:19.080
<v Speaker 2>Jordan's a film in here, fold in here, excuse me, Jordan.

0:14:19.120 --> 0:14:22.120
<v Speaker 2>There's this basketball team called the New York Knicks, and

0:14:22.160 --> 0:14:24.840
<v Speaker 2>I can't think this morning. It's sort of like the

0:14:24.880 --> 0:14:30.360
<v Speaker 2>Tots before the europe will win Jordan, but we're praying Jordan.

0:14:30.520 --> 0:14:36.400
<v Speaker 2>Fold in here, the Rashudo GDP call and Dominic's brilliant work.

0:14:37.000 --> 0:14:40.880
<v Speaker 2>And now you get to know fed rate increases this year.

0:14:41.840 --> 0:14:43.920
<v Speaker 8>At least a good trade as well, because what we

0:14:43.960 --> 0:14:45.920
<v Speaker 8>think is there's going to be no Fed cuts this year.

0:14:46.400 --> 0:14:48.800
<v Speaker 8>Steve's got one and a half percent GDP forecast but

0:14:48.840 --> 0:14:51.200
<v Speaker 8>a three and a half percent inflation, So your nominal's

0:14:51.200 --> 0:14:53.800
<v Speaker 8>at five and the Fed's going to be looking at

0:14:53.800 --> 0:14:56.720
<v Speaker 8>three and a half inflation. That's not an environment where

0:14:56.720 --> 0:14:59.400
<v Speaker 8>you're cutting rates. You need to have really big weakness

0:14:59.440 --> 0:15:02.120
<v Speaker 8>in the labor mind to do so. However, what Constant

0:15:02.120 --> 0:15:04.280
<v Speaker 8>would point out, and what I point out too, is

0:15:04.320 --> 0:15:06.960
<v Speaker 8>that this market is very much inclined to say that

0:15:07.000 --> 0:15:08.920
<v Speaker 8>there's a very high bar to get to get this

0:15:09.040 --> 0:15:11.280
<v Speaker 8>market to think hikes are the next move by the Fed,

0:15:11.640 --> 0:15:14.400
<v Speaker 8>the market will continue to think that cuts the next move,

0:15:14.720 --> 0:15:16.760
<v Speaker 8>but we are of the view it won't happen this year.

0:15:17.120 --> 0:15:19.400
<v Speaker 8>So what that means for trades is we like front

0:15:19.520 --> 0:15:22.640
<v Speaker 8>end flatteners. So price out the rate cuts for this year,

0:15:22.880 --> 0:15:24.960
<v Speaker 8>pricing more cuts for next year, because that's how this

0:15:25.040 --> 0:15:25.880
<v Speaker 8>market is biased.

0:15:25.960 --> 0:15:27.240
<v Speaker 6>So we have a steep we can have.

0:15:27.200 --> 0:15:29.520
<v Speaker 8>A flattening of the curve. More cuts, price for twenty

0:15:29.520 --> 0:15:31.120
<v Speaker 8>twenty six, less for twenty five.

0:15:31.280 --> 0:15:34.680
<v Speaker 2>Global Wall Street brands that what you just heard whether

0:15:34.720 --> 0:15:37.760
<v Speaker 2>you agree or disagree. The heart of the matter is

0:15:37.840 --> 0:15:43.800
<v Speaker 2>Missoul gets to a pop in five percent nominal gdp Jordan.

0:15:43.960 --> 0:15:49.680
<v Speaker 2>It's a completely different nominal GDP than a normal nominal gdp.

0:15:50.280 --> 0:15:53.320
<v Speaker 2>How does the litmus paper your world? How does the

0:15:53.360 --> 0:15:57.640
<v Speaker 2>litmus paper of the system FX deal with this weird

0:15:57.880 --> 0:16:00.680
<v Speaker 2>wacko five percent nominal GDP.

0:16:02.200 --> 0:16:04.720
<v Speaker 8>It's not too whacko, Tom, But what it does mean

0:16:04.800 --> 0:16:08.120
<v Speaker 8>is that the equity earning space, for example, will be

0:16:08.120 --> 0:16:10.240
<v Speaker 8>in a healthy spot even though the real GDP is

0:16:10.320 --> 0:16:12.600
<v Speaker 8>low because real GDP has been roughly around two to

0:16:12.680 --> 0:16:15.960
<v Speaker 8>three in the US for some time, their earnings potential

0:16:16.040 --> 0:16:19.760
<v Speaker 8>will be inflation adjusted with the tariffs and so forth.

0:16:19.920 --> 0:16:22.600
<v Speaker 8>We've still got five percent nomenal GDP growth. This is

0:16:22.640 --> 0:16:25.920
<v Speaker 8>an environment where it's not us outperformance on a real

0:16:25.920 --> 0:16:28.880
<v Speaker 8>GDP perspective, but you will see the equity market hold up.

0:16:29.080 --> 0:16:30.880
<v Speaker 8>So we're not looking for a big risk off in

0:16:30.920 --> 0:16:32.960
<v Speaker 8>the equity market as a result of that, and that

0:16:33.080 --> 0:16:36.000
<v Speaker 8>means the dollar can weaken. That's the sort of story

0:16:36.040 --> 0:16:37.880
<v Speaker 8>that we have that helps us get that one twenty

0:16:37.880 --> 0:16:38.480
<v Speaker 8>by year end.

0:16:38.760 --> 0:16:40.840
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's a narrative, you know, I mean, I mean,

0:16:41.000 --> 0:16:42.240
<v Speaker 2>you know, I don't know if he's going to be

0:16:42.320 --> 0:16:45.880
<v Speaker 2>right or wrong, but I would suggest Paul, very few

0:16:45.960 --> 0:16:52.440
<v Speaker 2>people are guessing now stocks higher within the sixteen hundred

0:16:52.440 --> 0:16:54.680
<v Speaker 2>Pennsylvania Avenue news flow.

0:16:54.840 --> 0:16:58.080
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, exactly, it's a lot of noise out there. Jordan.

0:16:58.720 --> 0:17:01.840
<v Speaker 5>We saw Germany's several months ago really step up their

0:17:01.840 --> 0:17:04.800
<v Speaker 5>commitment to spending more on their infrastructure on their defense.

0:17:05.920 --> 0:17:08.400
<v Speaker 5>Can the rest of Europe do that as well? Or

0:17:09.119 --> 0:17:10.400
<v Speaker 5>is that just a flash in the pan.

0:17:11.720 --> 0:17:13.800
<v Speaker 6>I wish they could, but the answers no.

0:17:14.000 --> 0:17:16.480
<v Speaker 8>I mean, look at France, they really struggled to pass

0:17:16.480 --> 0:17:18.719
<v Speaker 8>a budget just last year, they had to hold an

0:17:18.760 --> 0:17:22.440
<v Speaker 8>election over it and everything, so they're fisically constrained running

0:17:22.480 --> 0:17:25.639
<v Speaker 8>up against the buffers. Italy has been much more well behaved,

0:17:26.000 --> 0:17:28.280
<v Speaker 8>but it also would be running up against the buffers

0:17:28.720 --> 0:17:31.040
<v Speaker 8>of the rules, even though the rules have been suspended.

0:17:31.760 --> 0:17:34.760
<v Speaker 8>There's only so much the market will will take before

0:17:34.960 --> 0:17:37.560
<v Speaker 8>punishing them as well in their bond market. And then

0:17:37.600 --> 0:17:40.600
<v Speaker 8>the same for the UK, where the Chancellor is really

0:17:40.640 --> 0:17:45.200
<v Speaker 8>struggling to tinker around with spending and tax pledges that

0:17:45.240 --> 0:17:48.080
<v Speaker 8>she's made without breaking her own fiscal rules, and we

0:17:48.280 --> 0:17:50.800
<v Speaker 8>actually could see a bit more spending on the government

0:17:50.880 --> 0:17:53.480
<v Speaker 8>side in the UK, but higher taxes at the next

0:17:53.480 --> 0:17:57.000
<v Speaker 8>October budget. So it really boils down to can the

0:17:57.080 --> 0:18:00.439
<v Speaker 8>EU get around this by doing joint tissue, and I

0:18:00.480 --> 0:18:02.560
<v Speaker 8>think that's what we might see. There's a big summit

0:18:02.600 --> 0:18:04.000
<v Speaker 8>coming up in June. We've got a few dates in

0:18:04.080 --> 0:18:06.439
<v Speaker 8>June at the G seven middle of June, fifteenth to

0:18:06.440 --> 0:18:09.200
<v Speaker 8>the seventeenth, there's a NATO summit, and there's an EU

0:18:09.280 --> 0:18:11.920
<v Speaker 8>Defense summit towards the end of June. If we get

0:18:11.960 --> 0:18:16.000
<v Speaker 8>one of those leading to joint issuance becoming a story

0:18:16.359 --> 0:18:18.879
<v Speaker 8>that could help the Europeans out of this because that

0:18:18.880 --> 0:18:21.560
<v Speaker 8>would be triple A rated. It wouldn't have any of

0:18:21.600 --> 0:18:23.800
<v Speaker 8>the problems of France and Italy involved.

0:18:23.520 --> 0:18:25.480
<v Speaker 2>Out six months even to the end of the year.

0:18:25.520 --> 0:18:29.639
<v Speaker 2>What is the Jordan in Rochester big figure currency pair

0:18:30.359 --> 0:18:32.520
<v Speaker 2>where Lisa Matteo may profit.

0:18:34.119 --> 0:18:36.280
<v Speaker 8>I think essentially your holidays to Europe will get a

0:18:36.280 --> 0:18:37.000
<v Speaker 8>bit more expensive.

0:18:37.080 --> 0:18:39.879
<v Speaker 6>Tom. The one twenty call we've made on euro is

0:18:40.280 --> 0:18:40.880
<v Speaker 6>the key one.

0:18:41.119 --> 0:18:44.480
<v Speaker 8>The one thirty eight on Dolly n Sterling is where

0:18:44.520 --> 0:18:47.400
<v Speaker 8>it all but less benign with actually our target now.

0:18:47.480 --> 0:18:49.680
<v Speaker 8>So I think there's if I was biased to sell something,

0:18:49.720 --> 0:18:50.879
<v Speaker 8>it would be starling.

0:18:50.520 --> 0:18:53.720
<v Speaker 2>Because as euro came at one sixteen, you're going to

0:18:53.760 --> 0:18:57.320
<v Speaker 2>one twenty, a little bit above the historic set. Fine,

0:18:57.600 --> 0:19:00.040
<v Speaker 2>at what level euro do we begin to say the

0:19:00.480 --> 0:19:04.240
<v Speaker 2>export angst for Europe? Is it at one twenty or

0:19:04.280 --> 0:19:06.320
<v Speaker 2>is it a higher unimaginable number.

0:19:07.160 --> 0:19:08.760
<v Speaker 8>No, As we get to that level, that's going to

0:19:08.760 --> 0:19:10.440
<v Speaker 8>be where people start to talk about that we've already

0:19:10.480 --> 0:19:13.120
<v Speaker 8>got export We've already got export angs with the tariffs.

0:19:13.119 --> 0:19:16.359
<v Speaker 8>At the moment, the data looks fine because everybody's front running.

0:19:16.359 --> 0:19:19.040
<v Speaker 8>If you're in Chicago, if you're in Philadelphia, you're importing

0:19:19.080 --> 0:19:22.360
<v Speaker 8>as many cars as you can before those tariffs came

0:19:22.359 --> 0:19:24.760
<v Speaker 8>in at the higher levels. When we get to July,

0:19:24.960 --> 0:19:28.240
<v Speaker 8>that's when the reciprocal tariffs kick in, and that's when

0:19:28.280 --> 0:19:30.199
<v Speaker 8>we might see the data starts to slow down. So

0:19:30.240 --> 0:19:32.040
<v Speaker 8>I am worried over the summer that a lot of

0:19:32.080 --> 0:19:34.080
<v Speaker 8>this good news in the data leads to a more

0:19:34.160 --> 0:19:36.880
<v Speaker 8>doubsh GCB over the summer. But then in Q four

0:19:36.920 --> 0:19:39.320
<v Speaker 8>we'll see the issuance in Germany really pick up and

0:19:39.359 --> 0:19:41.080
<v Speaker 8>we'll talk about that higher level for Europe.

0:19:41.400 --> 0:19:43.760
<v Speaker 2>What a clinic, John Ranch, to thank you so much, greatly,

0:19:43.800 --> 0:19:47.520
<v Speaker 2>greatly appreciated with miszoom folding in the research there from

0:19:47.520 --> 0:19:51.280
<v Speaker 2>mister Rashudo and Doctor Constant as well.

0:19:51.640 --> 0:19:55.520
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Listen live each weekday

0:19:55.560 --> 0:19:58.840
<v Speaker 1>starting at seven am Eastern on Applecarplay and Android Otto

0:19:59.000 --> 0:20:01.960
<v Speaker 1>with the Bloomberg This Up. You can also listen live

0:20:02.040 --> 0:20:05.600
<v Speaker 1>on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station, Just

0:20:05.640 --> 0:20:08.200
<v Speaker 1>say Alexa Play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:20:08.520 --> 0:20:11.320
<v Speaker 2>Jennifer Jennsen, It's thrilled to have you with us. You've

0:20:11.359 --> 0:20:16.719
<v Speaker 2>got Stockton, Detroit, in Puerto Rico, cred Are you going

0:20:16.800 --> 0:20:22.000
<v Speaker 2>to be adding to those names? Harvard, Penn, Brown and

0:20:22.080 --> 0:20:25.040
<v Speaker 2>the rest? Is it really that bad for the rich

0:20:25.119 --> 0:20:26.880
<v Speaker 2>and mine at the private schools?

0:20:27.040 --> 0:20:29.040
<v Speaker 7>It is not, I'm happy to inform you.

0:20:29.960 --> 0:20:30.920
<v Speaker 3>Luckily, it's radio.

0:20:30.920 --> 0:20:33.119
<v Speaker 2>You got to talk more than that. It's early in

0:20:33.119 --> 0:20:35.040
<v Speaker 2>the morning, you gotta talk more than that.

0:20:35.920 --> 0:20:38.840
<v Speaker 7>So no, the good news is no. And here's why

0:20:39.240 --> 0:20:43.600
<v Speaker 7>we think that the market for the private higher education

0:20:43.720 --> 0:20:48.240
<v Speaker 7>universe is bifurcated. You have your really strong institutions Harvard, Yale, Stanford,

0:20:48.280 --> 0:20:51.399
<v Speaker 7>those guys, and then you have these small liberal arts

0:20:51.480 --> 0:20:54.600
<v Speaker 7>private schools that are maybe not in your city centers.

0:20:54.840 --> 0:20:57.120
<v Speaker 7>So we see a very bifurcated market. You have your

0:20:57.119 --> 0:20:59.520
<v Speaker 7>really really healthy balance sheet schools, and then you have

0:20:59.680 --> 0:21:01.760
<v Speaker 7>the small all are liberal arts schools that are really

0:21:01.880 --> 0:21:04.720
<v Speaker 7>challenged by the demographics that are out there. Fewer kids

0:21:04.720 --> 0:21:07.320
<v Speaker 7>are graduating from high school every year, fewer kids going

0:21:07.359 --> 0:21:10.320
<v Speaker 7>to college. How do you recruit them. The policies that

0:21:10.400 --> 0:21:13.480
<v Speaker 7>are coming out of DC, whether you're talking about federal aid,

0:21:13.520 --> 0:21:17.320
<v Speaker 7>whether you're talking about tax exemption, these are all targeted

0:21:17.560 --> 0:21:22.360
<v Speaker 7>at the high end, a really healthy part of the market.

0:21:22.680 --> 0:21:26.439
<v Speaker 7>So is this going to hurt the Harvards of the world. Sure,

0:21:26.520 --> 0:21:28.720
<v Speaker 7>it's going to be less money to them. They're going

0:21:28.800 --> 0:21:32.080
<v Speaker 7>to have less research programs going on. They might see

0:21:32.400 --> 0:21:36.800
<v Speaker 7>some different student mix if international students are truly eliminated

0:21:36.840 --> 0:21:40.680
<v Speaker 7>from their classes. But at the end of the day,

0:21:40.840 --> 0:21:44.840
<v Speaker 7>they've got strong balance sheets, incredible reputations. We're not going

0:21:44.880 --> 0:21:48.719
<v Speaker 7>to see even significant downgrades of these institutions, let alone

0:21:48.840 --> 0:21:50.600
<v Speaker 7>worrying about anything like a DeVault.

0:21:50.760 --> 0:21:54.040
<v Speaker 5>Jennifer, I think for your municipal bond market, the issue

0:21:54.040 --> 0:21:57.159
<v Speaker 5>front and center is the basis for your market, is

0:21:57.160 --> 0:22:02.679
<v Speaker 5>the tax deductibility of municipal bond interest payments. Is that

0:22:02.720 --> 0:22:05.040
<v Speaker 5>at risk here with some of the legislation. Sure.

0:22:05.080 --> 0:22:06.800
<v Speaker 7>So the thing that we have to keep in mind

0:22:06.920 --> 0:22:10.400
<v Speaker 7>is that the question over tax exemption comes up every administration.

0:22:10.560 --> 0:22:14.040
<v Speaker 7>Every time there's a new administration, this topic comes up. Now, Admittedly,

0:22:14.440 --> 0:22:17.960
<v Speaker 7>the conversation is far more robust this time around because

0:22:17.960 --> 0:22:20.040
<v Speaker 7>it's being you or being talked about is being used

0:22:20.080 --> 0:22:25.080
<v Speaker 7>as a way to help pay for the tax TCJA

0:22:25.200 --> 0:22:28.439
<v Speaker 7>tax exceptions. Now, the good news is that there's been

0:22:28.440 --> 0:22:31.760
<v Speaker 7>a huge lobbying effort amongst everybody in the municipal bond

0:22:31.760 --> 0:22:36.960
<v Speaker 7>industry reminding Congress that municipal bonds are the key tool

0:22:37.040 --> 0:22:39.640
<v Speaker 7>that we use to build infrastructure in this country. That's

0:22:39.680 --> 0:22:41.639
<v Speaker 7>how we do it here. The federal government does not

0:22:41.720 --> 0:22:44.480
<v Speaker 7>pay for infrastructure, so municipal bonds are a key component

0:22:44.520 --> 0:22:47.440
<v Speaker 7>of that. Now, who pays the debt service on municipal

0:22:47.480 --> 0:22:51.280
<v Speaker 7>bonds taxpayers. So if you take the tax exemption away,

0:22:51.359 --> 0:22:54.879
<v Speaker 7>it's going to raise borrowing costs for all municipalities and

0:22:55.040 --> 0:22:57.959
<v Speaker 7>increase what taxpayers have to pay to support that debt service.

0:22:58.000 --> 0:23:01.160
<v Speaker 2>If someone in a double triple tex extra state, look

0:23:01.280 --> 0:23:05.960
<v Speaker 2>outside outside of state municipal bunds right now.

0:23:06.080 --> 0:23:09.280
<v Speaker 7>So you definitely can do that, and we I mean,

0:23:09.320 --> 0:23:12.520
<v Speaker 7>we run national funds, so anybody invested in a national fund,

0:23:12.560 --> 0:23:14.960
<v Speaker 7>but of course have exposure throughout the country.

0:23:15.000 --> 0:23:17.960
<v Speaker 2>New York and California. You got to go fourporal tech free.

0:23:17.800 --> 0:23:20.199
<v Speaker 7>Right, Yeah, and you're going to do that because just

0:23:20.240 --> 0:23:22.560
<v Speaker 7>the taxes are so high here that for you to

0:23:22.640 --> 0:23:26.400
<v Speaker 7>have a tax yeah hamp for California, so I could

0:23:26.400 --> 0:23:29.120
<v Speaker 7>feel that too. So to have that in your portfolio

0:23:29.240 --> 0:23:31.840
<v Speaker 7>is definitely going to make sense. But there are definitely

0:23:32.000 --> 0:23:34.159
<v Speaker 7>other states out there where you just don't have the

0:23:34.240 --> 0:23:37.160
<v Speaker 7>ability to have as much municipal debt as you're lucky

0:23:37.160 --> 0:23:41.320
<v Speaker 7>to be able to get in New York, Massachusetts, New Jersey, California.

0:23:40.880 --> 0:23:42.479
<v Speaker 2>Were musciple supply.

0:23:43.240 --> 0:23:45.240
<v Speaker 3>I know, we're so lucky with the high taxes.

0:23:46.320 --> 0:23:48.720
<v Speaker 5>Tons of municipal bonds came into the market in twenty

0:23:48.720 --> 0:23:50.200
<v Speaker 5>two or four. I think it's like a record year

0:23:51.720 --> 0:23:54.040
<v Speaker 5>when rates are hired. That's what I learned, miss bond

0:23:54.080 --> 0:23:56.919
<v Speaker 5>market issue is issue when they need the money, not

0:23:56.960 --> 0:23:57.800
<v Speaker 5>when rates are low.

0:23:58.119 --> 0:23:59.719
<v Speaker 7>Exactly. It goes back to supply.

0:24:00.200 --> 0:24:01.800
<v Speaker 3>Look like this year yeah, so believe.

0:24:01.560 --> 0:24:03.119
<v Speaker 7>It or not, we actually think supply is going to

0:24:03.200 --> 0:24:06.080
<v Speaker 7>top last year's numbers. We're seeing that so far. This year,

0:24:06.520 --> 0:24:08.000
<v Speaker 7>and this is the time of the year where we

0:24:08.119 --> 0:24:10.639
<v Speaker 7>usually start to see supply numbers slow down a little bit.

0:24:10.680 --> 0:24:14.920
<v Speaker 7>You know, the summer comes on. Typically people stop issuing, dead,

0:24:14.960 --> 0:24:17.280
<v Speaker 7>people are on vacation, that whole thing. That is not

0:24:17.440 --> 0:24:20.560
<v Speaker 7>the case. We're still seeing ten plus billion dollar weeks

0:24:20.960 --> 0:24:23.760
<v Speaker 7>of issuance. We're seeing bonds get done well as well,

0:24:23.800 --> 0:24:27.320
<v Speaker 7>I mean oversubscribed, and the market's taking them well.

0:24:27.320 --> 0:24:30.159
<v Speaker 2>You so we're thrilled to have you here. What's the

0:24:30.280 --> 0:24:34.280
<v Speaker 2>number one mistake people make when investing in UNI bonds.

0:24:34.480 --> 0:24:37.239
<v Speaker 7>Not investing in meuning bonds. I think people think that

0:24:37.359 --> 0:24:42.200
<v Speaker 7>municipal bonds are for old retired people, and that's absolutely

0:24:41.520 --> 0:24:47.640
<v Speaker 7>not and that's absolutely not the case. And there's other

0:24:47.680 --> 0:24:50.080
<v Speaker 7>things than the tax exemption that municipal bonds can bring

0:24:50.080 --> 0:24:53.119
<v Speaker 7>your portfolio well, strong fundamentals.

0:24:52.760 --> 0:24:54.520
<v Speaker 3>And historically low default rates.

0:24:54.640 --> 0:24:57.119
<v Speaker 7>So one of the big comparisons we like to use

0:24:57.200 --> 0:24:59.760
<v Speaker 7>right now when we talk about why muni's now is

0:25:00.040 --> 0:25:02.040
<v Speaker 7>hering it to corporate bonds. We have a lot of

0:25:02.040 --> 0:25:04.040
<v Speaker 7>people still in cash who probably should get out of

0:25:04.040 --> 0:25:06.560
<v Speaker 7>that cash and get it invested. You come into the

0:25:06.640 --> 0:25:10.360
<v Speaker 7>MUNI market on a taxable equivalent equivalent yield. You can

0:25:10.440 --> 0:25:13.960
<v Speaker 7>still make hundreds of basis points over a corporate bond

0:25:14.200 --> 0:25:19.560
<v Speaker 7>with a significantly safer fundamental picture and with historically lower

0:25:19.600 --> 0:25:21.719
<v Speaker 7>default rates, so you can without having to take too

0:25:21.760 --> 0:25:25.000
<v Speaker 7>much risk. You can add, well, yes, I'm there, Jennifer.

0:25:25.040 --> 0:25:27.159
<v Speaker 2>Thank you so much, Jennifer Johnson, whether she is with

0:25:27.280 --> 0:25:28.880
<v Speaker 2>Franklin Templeton.

0:25:34.400 --> 0:25:38.280
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Listen live each weekday

0:25:38.320 --> 0:25:41.320
<v Speaker 1>starting at seven am Eastern on Apple, Cocklay and Android

0:25:41.359 --> 0:25:44.399
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business up. You can also watch

0:25:44.440 --> 0:25:47.399
<v Speaker 1>us live every weekday on YouTube and always on the

0:25:47.400 --> 0:25:48.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg terminal.

0:25:48.960 --> 0:25:51.320
<v Speaker 2>And she's been up to three am working on this.

0:25:51.520 --> 0:25:54.800
<v Speaker 2>She's in a full tilt newspaper season. Here Lisa Mantao

0:25:55.359 --> 0:25:58.040
<v Speaker 2>with a wide view of twenty newspapers. So what do

0:25:58.040 --> 0:25:58.680
<v Speaker 2>you got this morning?

0:25:58.800 --> 0:26:01.280
<v Speaker 9>Okay, this one's in the wall st Journal. So Jeopardy

0:26:01.320 --> 0:26:04.560
<v Speaker 9>is starting this new dream job for men. It's called

0:26:04.600 --> 0:26:08.360
<v Speaker 9>a stay at home son. Okay, it's the champion there.

0:26:08.480 --> 0:26:11.480
<v Speaker 9>It's Brendon Leao. He's twenty seven, has a master's degree

0:26:11.560 --> 0:26:14.080
<v Speaker 9>right political science. He was studying for the ELSATS, got

0:26:14.080 --> 0:26:16.200
<v Speaker 9>the call for the show. He went on. He won

0:26:16.280 --> 0:26:19.919
<v Speaker 9>nearly sixty thousand dollars in three contests. He's unemployed. He

0:26:19.960 --> 0:26:22.280
<v Speaker 9>lives in moms and Dad's house. You know, he's twenty seven,

0:26:22.359 --> 0:26:24.399
<v Speaker 9>but he doesn't live in the basement playing video games.

0:26:24.480 --> 0:26:26.280
<v Speaker 7>No, he's still looking for a job.

0:26:26.840 --> 0:26:29.200
<v Speaker 9>But what it did is that, you know, they introduce

0:26:29.320 --> 0:26:32.200
<v Speaker 9>him as that, you know, here's this stay at home son,

0:26:32.359 --> 0:26:35.480
<v Speaker 9>and it sparked this talk on social media that people

0:26:35.480 --> 0:26:37.399
<v Speaker 9>are saying, hey, I want to be one of those

0:26:38.280 --> 0:26:39.959
<v Speaker 9>I want to do that. So it went from this

0:26:40.080 --> 0:26:43.760
<v Speaker 9>like negative turn right to a positive turn because of

0:26:43.800 --> 0:26:45.120
<v Speaker 9>the labor market right.

0:26:45.000 --> 0:26:49.000
<v Speaker 2>Here, yeash debate and what I've learned, it's ginormous in Europe.

0:26:49.840 --> 0:26:54.240
<v Speaker 5>It's way huge in Italy.

0:26:54.560 --> 0:26:58.200
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, so they stay at home longer, Yeah, forever, sahole.

0:26:58.440 --> 0:27:01.600
<v Speaker 9>It's like it's a cultural know in Latino community. Like me,

0:27:01.720 --> 0:27:03.800
<v Speaker 9>I like my kids to like stay home as long

0:27:03.840 --> 0:27:07.200
<v Speaker 9>as you can and say you know that, yes, I do.

0:27:07.320 --> 0:27:07.680
<v Speaker 5>I know.

0:27:08.720 --> 0:27:11.520
<v Speaker 2>Clock in the living room, folks, we've got a countdown

0:27:11.640 --> 0:27:16.320
<v Speaker 2>clock right now. You've got to guitars ready to move

0:27:16.359 --> 0:27:19.600
<v Speaker 2>in there me seven days out or one hundred and

0:27:19.600 --> 0:27:22.280
<v Speaker 2>twelve days out, I don't know whatever, but it is.

0:27:22.359 --> 0:27:24.320
<v Speaker 7>So he's warking this new trend.

0:27:24.400 --> 0:27:27.879
<v Speaker 9>Okay, okay, so those who can't find a job to

0:27:27.880 --> 0:27:30.120
<v Speaker 9>those who have won some good news for New York

0:27:30.160 --> 0:27:33.440
<v Speaker 9>City possibly have Today, former New York Company Andrew Cuomo

0:27:33.560 --> 0:27:35.840
<v Speaker 9>running for mayor. He's going to announce a plan to

0:27:36.000 --> 0:27:38.480
<v Speaker 9>raise the city's minimum wage to twenty dollars an hour

0:27:38.520 --> 0:27:41.159
<v Speaker 9>by twenty twenty seven, and that would put it among

0:27:41.160 --> 0:27:44.359
<v Speaker 9>the highest in the nation. He's also suggesting, because you're saying,

0:27:44.359 --> 0:27:47.080
<v Speaker 9>what about the businesses, to create this tax credit for

0:27:47.200 --> 0:27:50.240
<v Speaker 9>small businesses to help them adjust to the higher wage.

0:27:50.640 --> 0:27:53.000
<v Speaker 9>But he's appearing at a rally today, He's going to

0:27:53.040 --> 0:27:54.679
<v Speaker 9>be there with several unions that were backing in.

0:27:54.720 --> 0:27:56.439
<v Speaker 2>It was like, well, I think you're better tune on this.

0:27:56.600 --> 0:27:58.159
<v Speaker 2>I am because of all the work out in New

0:27:58.240 --> 0:28:01.320
<v Speaker 2>Jersey of the big box people. Is the is the

0:28:01.359 --> 0:28:04.639
<v Speaker 2>wage setter for minimum wage? Amazon?

0:28:05.080 --> 0:28:07.520
<v Speaker 5>I think so, And I think it's I don't think

0:28:07.520 --> 0:28:10.480
<v Speaker 5>it's the government. I kind of jokingly always say it's not.

0:28:10.560 --> 0:28:12.280
<v Speaker 5>I don't care what the government says in minimum wages

0:28:12.359 --> 0:28:15.920
<v Speaker 5>is whatever Amazon's paying in the work and most of America,

0:28:16.000 --> 0:28:18.040
<v Speaker 5>that just feels to me like you got to compete

0:28:18.040 --> 0:28:18.439
<v Speaker 5>against that.

0:28:18.480 --> 0:28:21.679
<v Speaker 2>It's like seventeen is right, Yeah, I think so.

0:28:21.840 --> 0:28:25.679
<v Speaker 5>I mean here in the state, Governor Kathy Hochel in

0:28:25.720 --> 0:28:28.480
<v Speaker 5>New York raised the minimum wages is sixteen dollars and

0:28:28.520 --> 0:28:31.240
<v Speaker 5>fifty cents an hour in New York City, so.

0:28:31.320 --> 0:28:34.080
<v Speaker 9>I think DC has the highest minium wage, like seventeen fifty.

0:28:34.160 --> 0:28:37.400
<v Speaker 5>Okay, So it's getting and again I think it's that's

0:28:37.400 --> 0:28:39.000
<v Speaker 5>the Nember we've heard from Amazon.

0:28:38.680 --> 0:28:42.880
<v Speaker 2>Two or three years ago. So okay, okay, today is

0:28:42.880 --> 0:28:43.240
<v Speaker 2>a day.

0:28:43.360 --> 0:28:46.480
<v Speaker 9>It's when New Yorkers they gather in the streets around sunset,

0:28:46.480 --> 0:28:49.200
<v Speaker 9>they take out their phones and there and their cameras

0:28:49.200 --> 0:28:51.640
<v Speaker 9>and they take a picture of the best sunset ever.

0:28:51.760 --> 0:28:52.880
<v Speaker 3>It's Manhattan headge.

0:28:52.920 --> 0:28:55.920
<v Speaker 9>Okay, but the first night, yes, it is tonight. But

0:28:56.000 --> 0:28:59.000
<v Speaker 9>the problem is, look at the outside. I know the

0:28:59.040 --> 0:29:01.360
<v Speaker 9>clouds are coming in and it's going to be cloudy.

0:29:01.600 --> 0:29:04.280
<v Speaker 9>It's supposed to be a full effect at eight thirteen pm.

0:29:04.360 --> 0:29:06.560
<v Speaker 9>So if you see people huddled outside of the Mill Street,

0:29:06.560 --> 0:29:09.080
<v Speaker 9>you know what it is. But if you can't see

0:29:09.160 --> 0:29:12.280
<v Speaker 9>it today, there's another chance tomorrow. But tomorrow is going

0:29:12.320 --> 0:29:13.240
<v Speaker 9>to be cloudy too.

0:29:14.160 --> 0:29:16.920
<v Speaker 5>It's the wettest spring everything. Yes, but if you stand

0:29:16.960 --> 0:29:18.440
<v Speaker 5>on and for people don't live in New York City.

0:29:18.600 --> 0:29:21.440
<v Speaker 5>You stand in any cross street. Correct, We're here at

0:29:21.440 --> 0:29:23.720
<v Speaker 5>fifty eighth Street. Just walk out on fifty eighth street.

0:29:23.760 --> 0:29:26.600
<v Speaker 5>Don't get run over. Look West, you can in theory

0:29:26.640 --> 0:29:28.160
<v Speaker 5>have this phenomenal sunset. Now.

0:29:28.200 --> 0:29:28.560
<v Speaker 2>I'll tell you.

0:29:28.560 --> 0:29:30.720
<v Speaker 5>We got a great sun rise this morning driving in

0:29:30.960 --> 0:29:33.000
<v Speaker 5>oh Okay. It was actually a little bit clear on

0:29:33.040 --> 0:29:35.400
<v Speaker 5>the eastern horizon, so it was a great sunrise over

0:29:35.400 --> 0:29:36.200
<v Speaker 5>the Atlantic Ocean.

0:29:36.240 --> 0:29:38.320
<v Speaker 9>But the sunset, I don't know if the sunset's good.

0:29:38.680 --> 0:29:40.840
<v Speaker 9>If you can't do it again, there's another chance you

0:29:40.880 --> 0:29:44.120
<v Speaker 9>have July eleventh and July twelfth, it's going to happen again.

0:29:44.200 --> 0:29:46.480
<v Speaker 9>And that's kind of the summertime, less chance of a

0:29:46.560 --> 0:29:48.720
<v Speaker 9>chance for Yeah, that's to be out there.

0:29:48.960 --> 0:29:50.480
<v Speaker 3>But it's a huge thing in New York City.

0:29:50.800 --> 0:29:55.160
<v Speaker 2>Very good, Lisa, I thank you. I did not really yep. Okay,

0:29:55.240 --> 0:29:58.040
<v Speaker 2>thank you, Lisa Totao there with the newspapers.

0:29:58.080 --> 0:30:03.120
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance, available on Apple, Spotify, and

0:30:03.280 --> 0:30:07.320
<v Speaker 1>anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each weekday

0:30:07.440 --> 0:30:10.920
<v Speaker 1>seven to ten am Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com, the

0:30:11.000 --> 0:30:15.040
<v Speaker 1>iHeartRadio app, tune in, and the Bloomberg Business app. You

0:30:15.080 --> 0:30:18.440
<v Speaker 1>can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube and

0:30:18.640 --> 0:30:20.360
<v Speaker 1>always on the Bloomberg terminal