WEBVTT - Nvidia Tops $2T and Reddit Files for IPO

0:00:02.560 --> 0:00:10.960
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:09.000 --> 0:00:14.240
<v Speaker 2>From Mahart where Innovation, money and power Collie in Silicon Valley, Nbon.

0:00:14.640 --> 0:00:19.160
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and Ed Ludlow.

0:00:32.159 --> 0:00:34.760
<v Speaker 3>And Caroline Heinder Bloomberg's world headquarters in New York. This

0:00:34.880 --> 0:00:37.880
<v Speaker 3>is Bloomberg Technology coming up in Vidio. It tops two

0:00:37.920 --> 0:00:41.120
<v Speaker 3>trillion dollars in market value, becoming the world's fourth most

0:00:41.159 --> 0:00:45.239
<v Speaker 3>valuable company. For coverage, Ahead Plus will break down reddits

0:00:45.280 --> 0:00:48.400
<v Speaker 3>filing to go public, from its AI ambitions to its

0:00:48.440 --> 0:00:50.760
<v Speaker 3>largest shareholders, and Sam Altman.

0:00:50.640 --> 0:00:51.560
<v Speaker 4>Here's Omni present.

0:00:51.800 --> 0:00:55.080
<v Speaker 3>We've got you covered and Calvana shares pop by the

0:00:55.120 --> 0:00:57.720
<v Speaker 3>most of seven months after the used car retailer defied

0:00:57.800 --> 0:01:00.720
<v Speaker 3>challenges of higher interest rates and inflation to actually post

0:01:00.960 --> 0:01:02.840
<v Speaker 3>we kind of solid end to twenty twenty three.

0:01:03.080 --> 0:01:05.520
<v Speaker 4>We sit down with the company's CEO. I mean, while

0:01:05.600 --> 0:01:06.520
<v Speaker 4>not all.

0:01:06.240 --> 0:01:10.400
<v Speaker 3>Earnings are glorious, and Mircado Libre manages to underperformer off

0:01:10.400 --> 0:01:12.960
<v Speaker 3>by thirteen percent, one of the worst performers on the day.

0:01:13.040 --> 0:01:15.640
<v Speaker 3>Not to mention Warner Brothers, which will be digging into

0:01:15.720 --> 0:01:18.280
<v Speaker 3>a little bit later, But first, let's just peel back

0:01:18.560 --> 0:01:20.679
<v Speaker 3>all of these narratives. When it comes to earnings, when

0:01:20.680 --> 0:01:23.000
<v Speaker 3>it comes to the AI boom, and really decide whether

0:01:23.000 --> 0:01:25.240
<v Speaker 3>there's more legs to run on In terms of this market,

0:01:25.280 --> 0:01:27.360
<v Speaker 3>Erica claren Places says, well, that's what folio manager of

0:01:27.360 --> 0:01:30.760
<v Speaker 3>a PGM Jennison Technology Fund her read on tech on

0:01:30.840 --> 0:01:33.200
<v Speaker 3>markets on and video. Of course, I mean, we look

0:01:33.200 --> 0:01:36.039
<v Speaker 3>at the one point nine at seven trillion dollar market capitalization,

0:01:36.080 --> 0:01:38.280
<v Speaker 3>we're clawing our way to the two trillion mark, Erica,

0:01:38.280 --> 0:01:41.720
<v Speaker 3>And I'm interested as to whether you think the hype

0:01:42.000 --> 0:01:45.120
<v Speaker 3>has reality underneath it and ultimately whether we will see

0:01:45.120 --> 0:01:47.520
<v Speaker 3>a leg higher or well we'll see a broadening at

0:01:47.600 --> 0:01:49.880
<v Speaker 3>last in terms of the AI love.

0:01:50.560 --> 0:01:52.640
<v Speaker 5>Well, to answer your question, I think yes to both.

0:01:53.240 --> 0:01:56.040
<v Speaker 5>Jennison has always had a very long term outlook on

0:01:56.640 --> 0:01:59.920
<v Speaker 5>trying to dimension what these opportunities are. We've always been

0:02:00.200 --> 0:02:03.120
<v Speaker 5>very very positive. We were very early in investing in

0:02:03.480 --> 0:02:07.200
<v Speaker 5>Nvidia back in twenty sixteen, and all of our expectations,

0:02:07.320 --> 0:02:10.120
<v Speaker 5>even as ambitious as they were, have been absolutely blown

0:02:10.120 --> 0:02:10.959
<v Speaker 5>out of the water.

0:02:10.760 --> 0:02:14.359
<v Speaker 4>To the upside. I mean, Jensen is an operator.

0:02:14.480 --> 0:02:16.959
<v Speaker 3>He manages to guide and then beat and guide and

0:02:17.000 --> 0:02:21.359
<v Speaker 3>beat each time and still managed to be a global business.

0:02:21.440 --> 0:02:23.639
<v Speaker 3>And I think that's sort of what's been extraordinary that

0:02:23.680 --> 0:02:25.640
<v Speaker 3>this is a company that is finding working with China

0:02:25.680 --> 0:02:29.280
<v Speaker 3>more difficult, largely because of US Chinese geopolitics. How much

0:02:29.320 --> 0:02:30.840
<v Speaker 3>do you have to factor that into some of these

0:02:30.840 --> 0:02:31.919
<v Speaker 3>big tech names.

0:02:32.040 --> 0:02:35.840
<v Speaker 5>Well, certainly the political landscape right now is much more

0:02:35.919 --> 0:02:39.320
<v Speaker 5>challenging for companies as they have restrictions in terms of

0:02:39.360 --> 0:02:41.720
<v Speaker 5>where they can sell what they can sell into China.

0:02:42.160 --> 0:02:45.680
<v Speaker 5>China had risen to about twenty percent of in Nvidia's

0:02:45.720 --> 0:02:48.640
<v Speaker 5>data center revenue. That contracted down to five percent in

0:02:48.680 --> 0:02:51.560
<v Speaker 5>the most recent quarter. But what we're seeing is for

0:02:51.600 --> 0:02:54.919
<v Speaker 5>companies like in Vidia, they've been very nimble, very innovative

0:02:55.120 --> 0:02:57.560
<v Speaker 5>in terms of coming out with products that comply with

0:02:57.600 --> 0:03:00.239
<v Speaker 5>all the export laws. Those will start to ship later

0:03:00.320 --> 0:03:02.959
<v Speaker 5>this year. We believe at Jennison that there's a lot

0:03:02.960 --> 0:03:06.200
<v Speaker 5>of pent up demand from those Chinese customers that will

0:03:06.240 --> 0:03:09.080
<v Speaker 5>contribute to the company's overall performance in the second half.

0:03:09.639 --> 0:03:10.880
<v Speaker 4>Let's broaden out from Nvidia.

0:03:10.960 --> 0:03:14.440
<v Speaker 3>Therefore, is there room market share ability and capability for

0:03:14.520 --> 0:03:16.240
<v Speaker 3>the likes of MD and some of the other rivals

0:03:16.280 --> 0:03:16.680
<v Speaker 3>in the space.

0:03:16.720 --> 0:03:18.400
<v Speaker 4>Should we look to other chip makers?

0:03:19.240 --> 0:03:21.600
<v Speaker 5>Our view is yes, at Jennison, we see that in

0:03:21.680 --> 0:03:25.120
<v Speaker 5>Nvidia in its own process of innovation has opened up

0:03:25.160 --> 0:03:28.360
<v Speaker 5>the doors of opportunity for many other companies, from compute

0:03:28.400 --> 0:03:32.440
<v Speaker 5>companies as you mentioned, like Advanced micro Devices and Broadcom

0:03:32.560 --> 0:03:36.520
<v Speaker 5>which we own in size, to storage companies, to networking companies,

0:03:36.720 --> 0:03:38.840
<v Speaker 5>and of course to software companies that are able to

0:03:38.960 --> 0:03:41.280
<v Speaker 5>harness this incredible compute.

0:03:40.840 --> 0:03:43.000
<v Speaker 4>Power to deliver software.

0:03:42.600 --> 0:03:45.880
<v Speaker 5>That enables tremendous games and productivity and innovation.

0:03:46.960 --> 0:03:49.640
<v Speaker 3>When just going back to Nvidia for a moment, is

0:03:49.720 --> 0:03:53.240
<v Speaker 3>there anything that makes you give pause a two trillion

0:03:53.280 --> 0:03:57.440
<v Speaker 3>dollar market valuation an issue of China or indeed of

0:03:57.520 --> 0:03:59.960
<v Speaker 3>just like running out of road of exuberance, or really

0:04:00.120 --> 0:04:03.440
<v Speaker 3>you have to go back to well forward pe ratios

0:04:03.440 --> 0:04:05.840
<v Speaker 3>that still make the company look really rather attractive and

0:04:05.920 --> 0:04:06.880
<v Speaker 3>not that expensive.

0:04:07.520 --> 0:04:10.440
<v Speaker 5>Well, what we try to do at Jennison is really

0:04:10.520 --> 0:04:13.040
<v Speaker 5>take a longer term view. We've actually written some white

0:04:13.040 --> 0:04:15.680
<v Speaker 5>papers that are on our website about this. But looking

0:04:15.720 --> 0:04:19.960
<v Speaker 5>out over the entire TAM of the installed base of infrastructure,

0:04:20.240 --> 0:04:23.640
<v Speaker 5>we see that as a one trillion dollar opportunity today.

0:04:24.040 --> 0:04:26.640
<v Speaker 5>But the very innovation that Nvidia and others are bringing

0:04:26.680 --> 0:04:30.160
<v Speaker 5>to the table is expanding that TAM and will really

0:04:30.200 --> 0:04:33.880
<v Speaker 5>only maybe ten to fifteen percent penetrated at this point,

0:04:34.040 --> 0:04:37.919
<v Speaker 5>so we see years of opportunity ahead for further penetration

0:04:38.000 --> 0:04:41.160
<v Speaker 5>of those markets, further updating to this brand new way

0:04:41.480 --> 0:04:44.120
<v Speaker 5>of compute, which is known as parallel processism.

0:04:44.560 --> 0:04:47.080
<v Speaker 4>Where else is the slack then, because there is.

0:04:47.160 --> 0:04:50.080
<v Speaker 3>If you talk to the VC community, yes they're looking

0:04:50.120 --> 0:04:52.640
<v Speaker 3>at the underlying compute and the large language models, but

0:04:52.640 --> 0:04:54.560
<v Speaker 3>they're also looking at the applications and the.

0:04:54.480 --> 0:04:55.559
<v Speaker 4>App layer to AI.

0:04:55.960 --> 0:04:58.560
<v Speaker 3>But where are you looking from an industry perspective where

0:04:58.640 --> 0:05:02.960
<v Speaker 3>ultificient intelligence can bring real opportunities for productivity.

0:05:02.279 --> 0:05:05.560
<v Speaker 5>Basic Well, you know, there are, of course the obvious

0:05:05.560 --> 0:05:08.360
<v Speaker 5>places that people talk about, the big hyperscalers being able

0:05:08.400 --> 0:05:12.560
<v Speaker 5>to recommend with much more accuracy and targets companies like

0:05:12.600 --> 0:05:17.719
<v Speaker 5>Amazon Google using these tools to improve their recommenders. However,

0:05:18.320 --> 0:05:21.159
<v Speaker 5>one of the I guess two big new opportunities that

0:05:21.200 --> 0:05:24.520
<v Speaker 5>have emerged in the market unexpectedly in twenty twenty three

0:05:24.520 --> 0:05:27.240
<v Speaker 5>and are accelerating into twenty twenty four. One would be

0:05:27.279 --> 0:05:31.240
<v Speaker 5>the healthcare industry, where companies are using this technology for

0:05:31.480 --> 0:05:34.960
<v Speaker 5>much faster drug development times. And then also we've seen

0:05:35.040 --> 0:05:39.480
<v Speaker 5>an extraordinary interest in sovereigns country's coming in saying we

0:05:39.560 --> 0:05:43.440
<v Speaker 5>want our own version of Chatchibt and our own native language.

0:05:43.560 --> 0:05:45.839
<v Speaker 5>They have their own sets of concerns with regards to

0:05:45.920 --> 0:05:49.160
<v Speaker 5>oversight that they can then control, and they are looking

0:05:49.240 --> 0:05:52.560
<v Speaker 5>for US counterparts to enable them to bring these technologies

0:05:52.600 --> 0:05:53.159
<v Speaker 5>to the market.

0:05:53.839 --> 0:05:56.560
<v Speaker 3>How about the cyber iml of all of this, because

0:05:56.600 --> 0:05:59.680
<v Speaker 3>it felt like that was a real tailwind for syvestalks

0:05:59.680 --> 0:06:01.440
<v Speaker 3>as well. And then you get the awnings of Palo

0:06:01.480 --> 0:06:03.680
<v Speaker 3>outs on networks and everyone's worried and then not going

0:06:03.720 --> 0:06:05.760
<v Speaker 3>to factor in as quickly as people at anticipate. Is

0:06:05.839 --> 0:06:08.320
<v Speaker 3>are there any parts of the technology space that you

0:06:08.400 --> 0:06:11.839
<v Speaker 3>think is overdone? All the valuation's on attractive right now?

0:06:12.320 --> 0:06:15.160
<v Speaker 5>Well, you know, what we're seeing at Jennison is a

0:06:15.360 --> 0:06:19.480
<v Speaker 5>real tale of haves and have not those companies that

0:06:19.560 --> 0:06:23.120
<v Speaker 5>are bringing technologies to the table that are truly disrupting

0:06:23.120 --> 0:06:25.919
<v Speaker 5>the industries that they are in, and those companies that

0:06:26.120 --> 0:06:30.120
<v Speaker 5>may be facing challenges over the longer period, particularly with

0:06:30.160 --> 0:06:34.240
<v Speaker 5>regards to pricing. People talk about, for example, as you mentioned, cybersecurity,

0:06:34.520 --> 0:06:37.520
<v Speaker 5>there's so many different flavors of where cybersecurity exists, whether

0:06:37.520 --> 0:06:39.760
<v Speaker 5>it's in the end market, in your phone or your computer,

0:06:40.080 --> 0:06:44.120
<v Speaker 5>whether it's in your enterprise or even whether it's within

0:06:44.200 --> 0:06:46.880
<v Speaker 5>the internet. So one really has to be very careful

0:06:47.160 --> 0:06:50.279
<v Speaker 5>in looking at the various players where they exist, whether

0:06:50.360 --> 0:06:52.760
<v Speaker 5>or not they have pricing power, and the sustainability of

0:06:52.760 --> 0:06:54.760
<v Speaker 5>that pricing power over a longer period of time.

0:06:56.120 --> 0:07:00.680
<v Speaker 3>Is your focus about the US paying the output FORMERHA

0:07:00.680 --> 0:07:03.960
<v Speaker 3>when it comes. There's been a lot of ongoing narrativists

0:07:04.000 --> 0:07:05.960
<v Speaker 3>whether China is ahead with AI or US, and it

0:07:06.000 --> 0:07:08.040
<v Speaker 3>feels as in the US still is. But where is

0:07:08.080 --> 0:07:10.360
<v Speaker 3>the global opportunity because as we reference at the top

0:07:10.400 --> 0:07:12.440
<v Speaker 3>of the show, European stocks are a record high. On

0:07:12.440 --> 0:07:14.320
<v Speaker 3>the back of this, Japanese docks managed to go on

0:07:14.320 --> 0:07:16.160
<v Speaker 3>the record high, and all of US are factoring in

0:07:16.240 --> 0:07:17.160
<v Speaker 3>AI because of that.

0:07:18.000 --> 0:07:20.640
<v Speaker 5>I think that the answer to this question is that

0:07:21.000 --> 0:07:24.640
<v Speaker 5>the predominance of the opportunities that we see are in

0:07:24.640 --> 0:07:29.559
<v Speaker 5>the United States. However, there are incredible opportunities overseas as well.

0:07:29.920 --> 0:07:34.200
<v Speaker 5>For example, ASM Lithography has a dominating position in the

0:07:34.240 --> 0:07:37.280
<v Speaker 5>area of lithography. This is an essential you cannot get

0:07:37.320 --> 0:07:40.160
<v Speaker 5>around it in using this tool to make the next

0:07:40.200 --> 0:07:44.120
<v Speaker 5>generation of semiconductors as well as the older generation of semiconductors.

0:07:44.600 --> 0:07:48.320
<v Speaker 5>This company is an incredibly innovative company, which is reflected

0:07:48.320 --> 0:07:52.080
<v Speaker 5>in its margin profile, grows profit margins, operating margins, free

0:07:52.080 --> 0:07:56.440
<v Speaker 5>cash flow margins, and so we do find opportunities overseas

0:07:56.560 --> 0:07:59.880
<v Speaker 5>as well, but the majority of the innovation that we're

0:08:00.320 --> 0:08:02.320
<v Speaker 5>and is in the United States today.

0:08:02.880 --> 0:08:05.160
<v Speaker 3>It's just been fantastic having your voice, your expertise on

0:08:05.200 --> 0:08:07.160
<v Speaker 3>the show. Thank You, you will come back, have a

0:08:07.160 --> 0:08:10.200
<v Speaker 3>wonderful weekend. Erika Klaarr, she's portfolio manager for the p

0:08:10.320 --> 0:08:13.640
<v Speaker 3>Jim Jennison Technology Fund, really taking us through all the

0:08:13.640 --> 0:08:14.520
<v Speaker 3>big hitters.

0:08:14.200 --> 0:08:14.520
<v Speaker 4>Of the week.

0:08:14.560 --> 0:08:17.720
<v Speaker 3>Mean while coming up WI another big hitter which eventually

0:08:17.800 --> 0:08:21.000
<v Speaker 3>might become public. Reddit it's filing for its IPO. All

0:08:21.120 --> 0:08:24.280
<v Speaker 3>the details on this company that's long been waiting to

0:08:24.320 --> 0:08:26.240
<v Speaker 3>get into the public markets. Meanwhile, let's go to those

0:08:26.240 --> 0:08:28.400
<v Speaker 3>public markets check in on what's happening with Walmart.

0:08:28.480 --> 0:08:32.160
<v Speaker 4>Up sixtens of percent. We're basically seeing flat.

0:08:31.840 --> 0:08:34.000
<v Speaker 3>Though on the company that it's looking to be acquiring

0:08:34.520 --> 0:08:37.000
<v Speaker 3>a ten spot ninety nine Viseo holdings.

0:08:37.040 --> 0:08:38.360
<v Speaker 4>Of course, Walmart's.

0:08:37.920 --> 0:08:41.240
<v Speaker 3>Acquisition of Video is a warning bell, according to Massachusetts

0:08:41.280 --> 0:08:42.520
<v Speaker 3>Democrat Elizabeth Warren.

0:08:42.840 --> 0:08:44.200
<v Speaker 4>She's putting this in a post on.

0:08:44.160 --> 0:08:47.280
<v Speaker 3>Social media platform x In fact, regulators should scrutinize this

0:08:47.400 --> 0:08:50.040
<v Speaker 3>merger and they will potentially be looking as to whether

0:08:50.040 --> 0:08:52.880
<v Speaker 3>it will extend Walmart's dominance, especially threatened competition.

0:08:52.960 --> 0:08:53.360
<v Speaker 4>She says.

0:08:53.480 --> 0:08:55.920
<v Speaker 3>Remember Walmart also gained on some strong results earlier in

0:08:56.000 --> 0:08:56.280
<v Speaker 3>the week.

0:08:56.559 --> 0:09:10.960
<v Speaker 4>This is Roommate Technology.

0:09:12.040 --> 0:09:15.200
<v Speaker 3>Let's talk about potential IPOs San Francisco, BA social media

0:09:15.200 --> 0:09:18.400
<v Speaker 3>company read it and has publicly filed for that IPO.

0:09:18.559 --> 0:09:19.960
<v Speaker 4>Long waited, and.

0:09:19.960 --> 0:09:21.160
<v Speaker 3>Of course it's going to be a big test for

0:09:21.240 --> 0:09:24.280
<v Speaker 3>VC backtech IPOs for the year. Here to break down

0:09:24.320 --> 0:09:26.240
<v Speaker 3>what we now know from the S one filing for

0:09:26.320 --> 0:09:29.000
<v Speaker 3>New Meg's Katie Rufe, who you've been tracking this closely,

0:09:29.040 --> 0:09:32.600
<v Speaker 3>waiting with baited breath, and we have ultimately got to

0:09:32.600 --> 0:09:34.800
<v Speaker 3>group to the fact that this company is not yet profitable.

0:09:36.440 --> 0:09:39.400
<v Speaker 6>That's true, that's right. They reported they have over eight

0:09:39.520 --> 0:09:42.800
<v Speaker 6>hundred million in annual revenue, but they are not profitable.

0:09:42.960 --> 0:09:46.840
<v Speaker 6>They lost less than one hundred million last year. Their

0:09:46.920 --> 0:09:51.800
<v Speaker 6>losses are shrinking and their revenue is growing, but not profitable.

0:09:52.040 --> 0:09:56.000
<v Speaker 6>They are hoping that this new AI partnership is going

0:09:56.080 --> 0:10:01.000
<v Speaker 6>to be what excites Wall Street, the partnership with Google,

0:10:01.240 --> 0:10:04.439
<v Speaker 6>and they're thinking that this is the time to announce that,

0:10:04.679 --> 0:10:06.880
<v Speaker 6>you know, the Google partnership that's going to scrape some

0:10:06.920 --> 0:10:10.200
<v Speaker 6>of their data from Reddit will excite.

0:10:10.440 --> 0:10:12.520
<v Speaker 3>And we'll see whether, of course that extends to other

0:10:12.600 --> 0:10:15.520
<v Speaker 3>large language models, most notably open Ai, where we understand

0:10:15.559 --> 0:10:17.680
<v Speaker 3>now that sal Maltman, who is a temporary CEO for

0:10:17.760 --> 0:10:20.520
<v Speaker 3>the company, is of course a big shareholder. But Katie

0:10:20.679 --> 0:10:22.079
<v Speaker 3>remind us who is going.

0:10:21.920 --> 0:10:24.000
<v Speaker 4>To be winning, who is whether or not they win.

0:10:24.120 --> 0:10:26.160
<v Speaker 3>Remember, this is kind of a down round compared to

0:10:26.200 --> 0:10:30.000
<v Speaker 3>its last money in from vcs at a ten billion valuation.

0:10:30.240 --> 0:10:34.920
<v Speaker 3>But are we anticipating some good liquidity events for some

0:10:35.040 --> 0:10:36.720
<v Speaker 3>KEYVC names out there.

0:10:38.000 --> 0:10:40.600
<v Speaker 6>Well, so Bloomberg has reported that they might just be

0:10:40.720 --> 0:10:43.800
<v Speaker 6>valued about five billion when they go public, although it

0:10:43.880 --> 0:10:46.800
<v Speaker 6>remains to be seen because a lot of this just

0:10:46.840 --> 0:10:50.000
<v Speaker 6>gets socided the night before based on how the market

0:10:50.120 --> 0:10:54.559
<v Speaker 6>is trading. They have. You know, it's interesting because they've

0:10:54.559 --> 0:10:56.720
<v Speaker 6>been around since two thousand and five, so some of

0:10:56.760 --> 0:11:01.360
<v Speaker 6>their early shareholders are no longer major in vesters, you know,

0:11:01.480 --> 0:11:04.720
<v Speaker 6>Conde Nasts actually they've been a major shareholder and Reddit

0:11:04.800 --> 0:11:07.840
<v Speaker 6>and so this has been a long time coming for

0:11:07.920 --> 0:11:12.239
<v Speaker 6>their investment. But you look at some of the early names,

0:11:12.280 --> 0:11:17.040
<v Speaker 6>like a founder Alexis o'hanian. He wasn't even on the prospectus.

0:11:17.600 --> 0:11:20.760
<v Speaker 6>He did not make the cuite for a five percent shareholder,

0:11:20.800 --> 0:11:22.880
<v Speaker 6>which is what it's required to see in the filing.

0:11:23.040 --> 0:11:26.400
<v Speaker 6>So you know, at this point, since Reddit's been around

0:11:26.559 --> 0:11:29.000
<v Speaker 6>nineteen years, I would imagine a lot of the original

0:11:29.000 --> 0:11:34.040
<v Speaker 6>shareholders actually sold shares on the secondary markets and got

0:11:34.120 --> 0:11:37.439
<v Speaker 6>some early liquidity before the actual liquidity event.

0:11:37.920 --> 0:11:41.480
<v Speaker 3>Advanced Magazine publishes, as you say, the new house family

0:11:41.520 --> 0:11:44.640
<v Speaker 3>behind Conye Nast, and plenty of other publishing set to

0:11:44.679 --> 0:11:47.040
<v Speaker 3>be a Kia and or in this particular event.

0:11:47.200 --> 0:11:48.000
<v Speaker 4>We thank you, Katie.

0:11:48.000 --> 0:11:50.520
<v Speaker 3>We've just breaking down the intricacies of what's going on.

0:11:50.600 --> 0:11:53.280
<v Speaker 3>Let's get into well that secondary market, how active it is,

0:11:53.280 --> 0:11:55.559
<v Speaker 3>how positive is on Reddit getting to any sort of

0:11:55.600 --> 0:11:58.360
<v Speaker 3>whipne it anywhere near a five billion dollar evaluation. We've

0:11:58.360 --> 0:12:01.600
<v Speaker 3>got Brian Lynch with us of Market inside of Equityzen

0:12:01.679 --> 0:12:04.280
<v Speaker 3>which connects to a holders of private companies with invested

0:12:04.360 --> 0:12:07.960
<v Speaker 3>seeking alternative investments, and just how active has read it

0:12:08.000 --> 0:12:09.800
<v Speaker 3>been in the secondary market.

0:12:10.880 --> 0:12:14.240
<v Speaker 7>Redda has definitely been a popular name in the secondary

0:12:14.240 --> 0:12:17.120
<v Speaker 7>market over the years since Katie said, this is a

0:12:17.240 --> 0:12:20.160
<v Speaker 7>nineteen year old company, So there has been a lot

0:12:20.160 --> 0:12:24.720
<v Speaker 7>of demand foreign liquidity from early shareholders over time.

0:12:25.200 --> 0:12:27.320
<v Speaker 8>You know. We know they did a tender offer in

0:12:27.400 --> 0:12:29.000
<v Speaker 8>twenty twenty one, so I think that.

0:12:29.080 --> 0:12:32.480
<v Speaker 7>Helped alleviate maybe some of that liquidity need. But I

0:12:32.520 --> 0:12:35.280
<v Speaker 7>think there's still a lot of demand for a liquidity

0:12:35.360 --> 0:12:38.199
<v Speaker 7>that will come you know, via the IPO. For what

0:12:38.240 --> 0:12:41.880
<v Speaker 7>we've seen from you know, trades that have been reported

0:12:41.920 --> 0:12:44.120
<v Speaker 7>recently in the secondary market is about a four and

0:12:44.120 --> 0:12:46.880
<v Speaker 7>a half for four point eight billion dollar valuation. So

0:12:47.400 --> 0:12:50.160
<v Speaker 7>the fact that they're eyeing a five billion dollar valuation

0:12:50.480 --> 0:12:53.400
<v Speaker 7>kind of makes sense since companies tend to trade at

0:12:53.440 --> 0:12:56.199
<v Speaker 7>a discount in the private markets where you don't have that.

0:12:56.200 --> 0:12:58.520
<v Speaker 8>Same liquidity that you do in the public markets.

0:12:59.040 --> 0:13:01.240
<v Speaker 3>Who if you can on and it's a tool from

0:13:01.280 --> 0:13:02.840
<v Speaker 3>the activity in the secondary market.

0:13:03.320 --> 0:13:04.760
<v Speaker 4>Is this going to be a retail name?

0:13:05.080 --> 0:13:09.160
<v Speaker 3>Given well ready it became synonymous with means stock investing

0:13:09.160 --> 0:13:11.520
<v Speaker 3>because the wool Street bets is it more likely to

0:13:11.520 --> 0:13:14.760
<v Speaker 3>be bought by retail investment? Will institutional players be interested

0:13:14.800 --> 0:13:17.400
<v Speaker 3>in a company that isn't yet posting profits.

0:13:18.880 --> 0:13:22.480
<v Speaker 7>I think they're really betting on there being retail interest

0:13:22.520 --> 0:13:24.760
<v Speaker 7>in this name or you know, in their s one

0:13:24.800 --> 0:13:26.959
<v Speaker 7>they even say as a risk factor, the fact that

0:13:26.960 --> 0:13:30.040
<v Speaker 7>there is retail interest, or they expect retail interest, is

0:13:30.120 --> 0:13:31.240
<v Speaker 7>going to cause.

0:13:31.040 --> 0:13:32.360
<v Speaker 8>Volatility in the stock.

0:13:32.760 --> 0:13:36.680
<v Speaker 7>The fact that they are issuing shares to seventy five

0:13:36.720 --> 0:13:39.880
<v Speaker 7>thousand power users, or allowing those users to buy into

0:13:39.920 --> 0:13:43.560
<v Speaker 7>the IPO, will also create some volatility. Since there's no

0:13:43.679 --> 0:13:45.839
<v Speaker 7>lock up to those shares, they're going to allow those

0:13:45.840 --> 0:13:47.439
<v Speaker 7>shares to trade freely.

0:13:47.600 --> 0:13:49.800
<v Speaker 8>So I think they're expecting a lot of.

0:13:49.760 --> 0:13:53.599
<v Speaker 7>Retail activity, which isn't likely to increase the volatility of

0:13:53.640 --> 0:13:57.679
<v Speaker 7>the stock, especially in its early days. From an institutional

0:13:57.679 --> 0:14:00.640
<v Speaker 7>investor perspective, I think you're right. You know, we've seen

0:14:00.920 --> 0:14:06.440
<v Speaker 7>over time that institutions are less interested in these unprofitable companies.

0:14:06.480 --> 0:14:09.559
<v Speaker 8>And Reddit is interesting because while they are.

0:14:09.440 --> 0:14:12.839
<v Speaker 7>A nineteen year old business, they really didn't start monetizing

0:14:13.000 --> 0:14:15.040
<v Speaker 7>until twenty so their.

0:14:14.880 --> 0:14:17.760
<v Speaker 8>Monetization engine is relatively.

0:14:17.240 --> 0:14:21.360
<v Speaker 7>Young and unproven, and advertising is ninety eight percent of

0:14:21.360 --> 0:14:25.080
<v Speaker 7>that engine now. And there are opportunities for them on

0:14:25.120 --> 0:14:27.920
<v Speaker 7>the data license in front, as Katie mentioned the Google

0:14:27.920 --> 0:14:30.600
<v Speaker 7>partnership they talked about this week, but a lot of

0:14:30.600 --> 0:14:35.320
<v Speaker 7>that is very forward looking and unproven, so I'm curious

0:14:35.360 --> 0:14:37.160
<v Speaker 7>to see how institutions.

0:14:37.280 --> 0:14:39.160
<v Speaker 8>You take that into account.

0:14:38.800 --> 0:14:41.240
<v Speaker 3>And Steve Hoffman, having been there at its birth in

0:14:41.240 --> 0:14:45.280
<v Speaker 3>two thousand and five, still driving that new iteration of Reddit.

0:14:45.640 --> 0:14:48.760
<v Speaker 4>And where is the risk factor in cozying.

0:14:48.400 --> 0:14:52.480
<v Speaker 3>Up with large language model makers, with the big tech

0:14:52.560 --> 0:14:54.400
<v Speaker 3>firms that want to scrape the data?

0:14:55.480 --> 0:14:56.160
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I think.

0:14:56.480 --> 0:14:58.440
<v Speaker 7>I mean, we've heard this from the Reddit community that

0:14:58.840 --> 0:15:02.000
<v Speaker 7>there has been some pushback about this and concern, but

0:15:02.040 --> 0:15:06.400
<v Speaker 7>it really is these human conversations that are needed to

0:15:06.440 --> 0:15:10.600
<v Speaker 7>train these models. And Reddit has, you know, billions of

0:15:10.880 --> 0:15:14.360
<v Speaker 7>posts and comments on its platform that are the exact

0:15:14.360 --> 0:15:16.440
<v Speaker 7>types of posts and comments that will help.

0:15:16.280 --> 0:15:17.120
<v Speaker 8>Train those models.

0:15:17.120 --> 0:15:20.320
<v Speaker 7>So I think there could be a little backlash from

0:15:20.480 --> 0:15:25.680
<v Speaker 7>users on the platform, but it is a huge monetization opportunity.

0:15:26.320 --> 0:15:29.320
<v Speaker 7>At the sixty million dollar contract they're talking about with Google,

0:15:29.400 --> 0:15:31.680
<v Speaker 7>that only makes up about seven and a half percent

0:15:31.680 --> 0:15:33.840
<v Speaker 7>of their current revenue, But if this is something that

0:15:33.880 --> 0:15:36.480
<v Speaker 7>they can replicate with others, it could become a much

0:15:36.480 --> 0:15:39.640
<v Speaker 7>more sizeable part of their business. But an interesting thing

0:15:39.720 --> 0:15:43.240
<v Speaker 7>that they do note is that these language learning models.

0:15:43.000 --> 0:15:44.640
<v Speaker 8>Could also hinder their business.

0:15:44.720 --> 0:15:48.520
<v Speaker 7>So if people go to chat GBT instead of Reddit

0:15:48.600 --> 0:15:51.960
<v Speaker 7>to ask whatever question they'd ask on Reddit, Reddit may

0:15:52.240 --> 0:15:55.080
<v Speaker 7>lose daily active users and that's really going to hurt

0:15:55.120 --> 0:15:56.520
<v Speaker 7>their ad revenue in the end.

0:15:56.600 --> 0:15:57.840
<v Speaker 8>So it's a double edged sword.

0:15:58.400 --> 0:16:03.600
<v Speaker 3>Well said, I'm interested in that advertising focus. Ultimately, when

0:16:03.640 --> 0:16:06.760
<v Speaker 3>analysts go out there and try to decide whose reddits

0:16:06.800 --> 0:16:10.640
<v Speaker 3>competitors are, are they immediately going to be looking to alphabet,

0:16:10.920 --> 0:16:13.440
<v Speaker 3>to meta to other social media platforms.

0:16:14.640 --> 0:16:18.160
<v Speaker 7>I think those are the obvious, you know, competitors in

0:16:18.160 --> 0:16:21.080
<v Speaker 7>the space, and this market has gotten a lot more

0:16:21.080 --> 0:16:25.160
<v Speaker 7>competitive as ad dollars have been pulled back. What Reddit

0:16:25.280 --> 0:16:29.160
<v Speaker 7>is really trying to sell investors on is the fact

0:16:29.200 --> 0:16:32.920
<v Speaker 7>that they can allow advertisers to reach a much more

0:16:33.080 --> 0:16:37.760
<v Speaker 7>niche target audience. So, you know, you're a sleeping bag manufacturer,

0:16:37.840 --> 0:16:39.640
<v Speaker 7>you want to talk to people who are camping. We

0:16:39.720 --> 0:16:43.239
<v Speaker 7>have a conversation of thousands of people who are specifically

0:16:43.280 --> 0:16:46.640
<v Speaker 7>talking about this and their ability to actually convert people.

0:16:47.000 --> 0:16:50.320
<v Speaker 7>From their own research, they've shown that sixty one percent

0:16:50.320 --> 0:16:52.960
<v Speaker 7>of their users say they're more likely to trust an

0:16:52.960 --> 0:16:54.240
<v Speaker 7>ad that comes from Reddit.

0:16:54.560 --> 0:16:55.840
<v Speaker 8>So if that can.

0:16:55.720 --> 0:16:59.560
<v Speaker 7>Be proven in the clicks and the impressions that these

0:16:59.560 --> 0:17:02.160
<v Speaker 7>ads get, they may have a bit of an edge,

0:17:02.200 --> 0:17:05.399
<v Speaker 7>even though their audience is much smaller than these other platforms,

0:17:05.600 --> 0:17:08.000
<v Speaker 7>but I think we're still early improving now.

0:17:08.880 --> 0:17:11.560
<v Speaker 3>Trying to be proving out the niche factor and whether

0:17:11.560 --> 0:17:13.919
<v Speaker 3>that's a drawer. Brian Lynch really great to catch up

0:17:13.960 --> 0:17:14.119
<v Speaker 3>with you.

0:17:14.200 --> 0:17:14.600
<v Speaker 4>Thank you.

0:17:22.160 --> 0:17:25.600
<v Speaker 3>Time now for talking tech. First up, GM's autonomous driving unit, Cruise,

0:17:26.040 --> 0:17:28.399
<v Speaker 3>is nearing the resumption of its robotaxi testing after the

0:17:28.400 --> 0:17:30.879
<v Speaker 3>grounding of its fleet last year. Now, according to sources,

0:17:30.920 --> 0:17:34.600
<v Speaker 3>Cruises in talks as several metro areas Houston Dallas, for example,

0:17:34.800 --> 0:17:37.520
<v Speaker 3>about test driving on public roads with safety drivers, and

0:17:37.600 --> 0:17:39.960
<v Speaker 3>before the suspension of the operations, company had hundreds of

0:17:39.960 --> 0:17:43.160
<v Speaker 3>cars in San Francisco and smaller numbers across Austin, Houston,

0:17:43.240 --> 0:17:46.520
<v Speaker 3>and Phoenix. Meanwhile, the investment firm that manages part of

0:17:46.560 --> 0:17:50.040
<v Speaker 3>the fortune of Ali Baba chairman Joe Zai Bluepool, It's

0:17:50.040 --> 0:17:53.240
<v Speaker 3>called It's all Over thirty four million Blue Owl shares

0:17:53.359 --> 0:17:55.359
<v Speaker 3>for eighty three percent of its remaining holdings in that

0:17:55.480 --> 0:17:56.800
<v Speaker 3>alternative asset Giant.

0:17:57.040 --> 0:17:58.680
<v Speaker 4>Now, the shares would have been worth about.

0:17:58.440 --> 0:18:01.119
<v Speaker 3>One or sixty million dollars in weighted average price at

0:18:01.119 --> 0:18:04.000
<v Speaker 3>the stock over the last three months. Now, let's turn

0:18:04.040 --> 0:18:06.479
<v Speaker 3>our attention to some other shares that are being hit

0:18:06.560 --> 0:18:08.560
<v Speaker 3>at the moment. Warner Brothers Discovery. We were just looking

0:18:08.600 --> 0:18:11.080
<v Speaker 3>at it before the break media company reporting its fourth

0:18:11.119 --> 0:18:13.600
<v Speaker 3>quarter revenue profits. They fell short of estimates, and we're

0:18:13.600 --> 0:18:15.200
<v Speaker 3>seeing the stock at a record low.

0:18:15.600 --> 0:18:17.080
<v Speaker 4>Chris pal Mary joins us.

0:18:16.960 --> 0:18:20.920
<v Speaker 3>Now on basically like weakness in linear television, weakness and

0:18:20.960 --> 0:18:23.480
<v Speaker 3>the advertising spend. I mean, was there any area that

0:18:23.600 --> 0:18:24.080
<v Speaker 3>was good?

0:18:25.920 --> 0:18:28.600
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I guess you could say if things weren't that bad.

0:18:28.840 --> 0:18:33.920
<v Speaker 9>In their direct to consumer the streaming business, it was unprofitable,

0:18:33.960 --> 0:18:37.320
<v Speaker 9>but for the full year it was profitable, and the

0:18:37.400 --> 0:18:40.720
<v Speaker 9>losses were much lower in the fourth quarter, and subscribers

0:18:40.720 --> 0:18:42.439
<v Speaker 9>were a little bit better than they hoped, but not

0:18:42.600 --> 0:18:48.280
<v Speaker 9>dramatic growth. Actually lost subscribers in domestically instilled way behind

0:18:48.320 --> 0:18:50.400
<v Speaker 9>Netflix and Disney in that department.

0:18:51.320 --> 0:18:55.320
<v Speaker 3>And all of this just highlights the dia straits that

0:18:55.359 --> 0:18:58.360
<v Speaker 3>basically the entire ecosystem finds itself in. We are understanding

0:18:58.400 --> 0:18:59.600
<v Speaker 3>there's going to be M and A that's going to

0:18:59.600 --> 0:19:02.440
<v Speaker 3>be consolid because a lot of these companies are struggling

0:19:02.440 --> 0:19:03.480
<v Speaker 3>with the same sort of headwinds.

0:19:03.520 --> 0:19:06.600
<v Speaker 9>Ran Yeah, And one of Brothers CEO, David Savo, is

0:19:06.640 --> 0:19:09.120
<v Speaker 9>pretty candid on the call. He said, this really does

0:19:09.200 --> 0:19:12.280
<v Speaker 9>illustrate all the challenges we're facing. I mean TV, traditional

0:19:12.280 --> 0:19:14.840
<v Speaker 9>TV advertising down at double digits.

0:19:14.960 --> 0:19:17.800
<v Speaker 10>And you know, the strikes really hurt them.

0:19:17.880 --> 0:19:21.520
<v Speaker 9>It turns out hoots last year, actors and writers being

0:19:21.640 --> 0:19:25.879
<v Speaker 9>out of not working, and so that studio business was down.

0:19:26.440 --> 0:19:28.880
<v Speaker 9>You know, Warner Brothers had a big push in December,

0:19:29.000 --> 0:19:31.199
<v Speaker 9>releasing three big movies at once. It was kind of

0:19:31.200 --> 0:19:36.359
<v Speaker 9>bold where revenue theatrically we're up, where profits were down, Aquaman.

0:19:36.320 --> 0:19:37.880
<v Speaker 8>Being the biggest disappointment there.

0:19:38.400 --> 0:19:40.719
<v Speaker 9>So there's a lot of they talked about on the call,

0:19:40.840 --> 0:19:44.359
<v Speaker 9>the superhero fatigue sort of. So there's a lot of

0:19:44.680 --> 0:19:46.639
<v Speaker 9>work to be done in these traditional media companies.

0:19:47.040 --> 0:19:49.560
<v Speaker 3>Sure is. And I know you'll be across at Chris Palmary.

0:19:49.600 --> 0:19:59.399
<v Speaker 3>We really appreciate it. Welcome back to being that technology

0:19:59.440 --> 0:20:01.359
<v Speaker 3>im caindin High in New York. Let's focus in on

0:20:01.400 --> 0:20:04.359
<v Speaker 3>a company that eventually will have its market capitalization for

0:20:04.440 --> 0:20:07.000
<v Speaker 3>all to see on the public markets Reddit. Of course,

0:20:07.040 --> 0:20:10.120
<v Speaker 3>company filing publicly for its IPO just yesterday after the Bell.

0:20:10.040 --> 0:20:12.240
<v Speaker 4>One name in the filing stood out.

0:20:12.440 --> 0:20:15.760
<v Speaker 3>He's everywhere Open AI CEO Sam Altman was listed to

0:20:15.760 --> 0:20:18.800
<v Speaker 3>one of the company's major shareholders, joining us now is

0:20:18.840 --> 0:20:21.480
<v Speaker 3>Bloomgg's Ryan Gould, and.

0:20:20.760 --> 0:20:21.880
<v Speaker 4>We shouldn't be surprised.

0:20:21.880 --> 0:20:24.359
<v Speaker 3>He was a for eight whole days the interim CEO

0:20:24.440 --> 0:20:27.720
<v Speaker 3>of this company. He of course was there at the

0:20:27.720 --> 0:20:31.840
<v Speaker 3>there at the y Combinator alongside the founders of Reddit

0:20:31.920 --> 0:20:35.400
<v Speaker 3>back in two thousands, early two thousands. But why does

0:20:35.400 --> 0:20:37.240
<v Speaker 3>he hold so much in the stock, Like who else

0:20:37.359 --> 0:20:38.880
<v Speaker 3>is also holding a lot of the stock here?

0:20:38.920 --> 0:20:41.919
<v Speaker 11>Well, I mean, you know, he let their series be

0:20:42.119 --> 0:20:46.400
<v Speaker 11>fifty million dollars in twenty fourteen. You know, he's sitting

0:20:46.440 --> 0:20:50.440
<v Speaker 11>alongside the advanced magazine publishers entity that is sort of

0:20:50.520 --> 0:20:53.960
<v Speaker 11>the new House family, the big Conde lost family that

0:20:54.040 --> 0:20:57.360
<v Speaker 11>owns around thirty four percent of the stock there.

0:20:58.200 --> 0:20:59.840
<v Speaker 10>You know, the new House family.

0:20:59.600 --> 0:21:01.640
<v Speaker 11>Sort of bought read it in two thousand and six

0:21:01.720 --> 0:21:04.520
<v Speaker 11>then spun it out in twenty eleven. So you know,

0:21:04.560 --> 0:21:06.719
<v Speaker 11>there's still a lot of Kerry. But I think, Caroline,

0:21:06.720 --> 0:21:09.439
<v Speaker 11>what's interesting is that this is kind of an ipio

0:21:09.480 --> 0:21:12.160
<v Speaker 11>for the moment. It has everything. It has, Ai has

0:21:12.200 --> 0:21:15.639
<v Speaker 11>sam Altman, it has advertising. It's reckoning with you know,

0:21:15.920 --> 0:21:18.320
<v Speaker 11>large language models and what it means for partnerships and

0:21:18.359 --> 0:21:21.560
<v Speaker 11>suddenly with Google and such. So yeah, I mean it's really,

0:21:21.760 --> 0:21:23.640
<v Speaker 11>it's really an ipio for the moment, I would.

0:21:23.440 --> 0:21:26.400
<v Speaker 3>Say, and ipeo that comes at time where markets are

0:21:26.440 --> 0:21:29.320
<v Speaker 3>at record or near record highs. We've had just smp

0:21:29.400 --> 0:21:31.359
<v Speaker 3>A clips a new one we've just had, you know,

0:21:31.480 --> 0:21:34.160
<v Speaker 3>Europeans stock markets are a record high, Japanese stock markets

0:21:34.160 --> 0:21:36.720
<v Speaker 3>are record high. What do you think the narrative has

0:21:36.760 --> 0:21:39.480
<v Speaker 3>to be to ensure that we don't question the market

0:21:39.480 --> 0:21:42.280
<v Speaker 3>cap too much. We're hearing from sources what about a

0:21:42.320 --> 0:21:44.560
<v Speaker 3>five billion dollar level for Reddit.

0:21:44.840 --> 0:21:45.840
<v Speaker 4>But that's a huge.

0:21:45.640 --> 0:21:48.080
<v Speaker 3>Markdown from where it recently, well not recently but a

0:21:48.119 --> 0:21:49.320
<v Speaker 3>few years ago, raised money.

0:21:49.400 --> 0:21:49.719
<v Speaker 4>It is.

0:21:49.800 --> 0:21:52.000
<v Speaker 11>It's a good point, and I think much of the

0:21:52.240 --> 0:21:55.320
<v Speaker 11>sort of talk so far, you know, on the testing, testing,

0:21:55.359 --> 0:21:57.359
<v Speaker 11>the waters meetings has been around. You know, let's not

0:21:57.400 --> 0:22:00.480
<v Speaker 11>get too ahead of ourselves here. Let's be realistic. This

0:22:00.680 --> 0:22:03.520
<v Speaker 11>is probably, you know, the first large venture capital back

0:22:03.600 --> 0:22:06.119
<v Speaker 11>tech alperiod we've had in a while. Obviously Clavier happened

0:22:06.200 --> 0:22:07.840
<v Speaker 11>last year, but this is kind of a different breed.

0:22:08.520 --> 0:22:10.600
<v Speaker 11>It's had a very story journey, and so I think,

0:22:10.640 --> 0:22:12.840
<v Speaker 11>you know, the banks investors are sort of coming together

0:22:12.880 --> 0:22:15.320
<v Speaker 11>and saying, well, you know, let's not really push this

0:22:15.400 --> 0:22:17.960
<v Speaker 11>too hard. Let's not end up in a situation where

0:22:17.960 --> 0:22:20.080
<v Speaker 11>we feel like, you know, we've been of more, we

0:22:20.160 --> 0:22:22.320
<v Speaker 11>can more than we can chew. And I think that

0:22:22.400 --> 0:22:24.360
<v Speaker 11>kind of reflects and how Reddit thinking about it as well.

0:22:24.400 --> 0:22:26.320
<v Speaker 11>It kind of wants to get past this history that

0:22:26.320 --> 0:22:28.119
<v Speaker 11>it's had for the past two years of being a

0:22:28.160 --> 0:22:30.959
<v Speaker 11>company that's just waiting and waiting and waiting to go public,

0:22:31.800 --> 0:22:33.760
<v Speaker 11>and it wants to get on with being a public company.

0:22:34.240 --> 0:22:36.240
<v Speaker 4>Steve Harfman himself wants to get on when.

0:22:36.080 --> 0:22:38.679
<v Speaker 3>Being a public CEO, having helped birst It back in

0:22:38.720 --> 0:22:40.920
<v Speaker 3>two thousand and five and still now he is the

0:22:40.960 --> 0:22:43.760
<v Speaker 3>current CEO. Rangled great to catch up with him as

0:22:43.880 --> 0:22:46.480
<v Speaker 3>IPO markets get a little bit more exciting now. Turning

0:22:46.480 --> 0:22:49.720
<v Speaker 3>from IPOs to the Moon to space more broadly, American

0:22:49.760 --> 0:22:52.240
<v Speaker 3>made lander It touched down on the Moon for the

0:22:52.280 --> 0:22:55.040
<v Speaker 3>first time since the Apollo era, and it happened last night.

0:22:55.200 --> 0:22:57.720
<v Speaker 3>I think a string of what have been pretty obvious

0:22:57.720 --> 0:23:01.199
<v Speaker 3>failures and making it the first prime at spacecraft to

0:23:01.280 --> 0:23:04.719
<v Speaker 3>ever reach the lunar surface. Intact Nalanda, built by Houston

0:23:04.760 --> 0:23:07.960
<v Speaker 3>based Intuitive Machines, reach the Moon at six twenty three

0:23:08.000 --> 0:23:11.440
<v Speaker 3>pm New York time on Thursday is what NASA Administrator

0:23:11.480 --> 0:23:13.160
<v Speaker 3>Bill Nelson had to say about.

0:23:12.920 --> 0:23:19.040
<v Speaker 12>The feet a commercial lander name Odysseus, powered by a

0:23:19.080 --> 0:23:25.960
<v Speaker 12>company called Intuitive Machines, launched upon a SpaceX rocket, carrying

0:23:26.160 --> 0:23:32.520
<v Speaker 12>a bounty of NASA scientific instruments and bearing the dream

0:23:32.560 --> 0:23:33.560
<v Speaker 12>of a new adventure.

0:23:35.760 --> 0:23:37.840
<v Speaker 3>Here to talk us through that dream of a new adventures,

0:23:37.880 --> 0:23:41.600
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg's Lauren Grush and Lauren this shows us not just

0:23:41.640 --> 0:23:43.640
<v Speaker 3>a dream, but the reality of the way in which

0:23:43.760 --> 0:23:47.440
<v Speaker 3>NASA is now working. It is turning to private companies,

0:23:47.600 --> 0:23:50.440
<v Speaker 3>and not just SpaceX anymore, but more start ups, more

0:23:50.480 --> 0:23:55.280
<v Speaker 3>other companies to help it basically make space a bit cheaper, right.

0:23:55.400 --> 0:23:57.640
<v Speaker 1>It's it's you know, NASA does want to go back

0:23:57.680 --> 0:23:58.960
<v Speaker 1>to the Moon, but they want to go back to

0:23:59.000 --> 0:24:01.200
<v Speaker 1>your moon in a very different way where they bring

0:24:01.440 --> 0:24:04.240
<v Speaker 1>many plenty of companies with them. And this was such

0:24:04.280 --> 0:24:06.879
<v Speaker 1>a great example of kind of this new paradigm shift

0:24:06.880 --> 0:24:09.960
<v Speaker 1>that NASA is working with. This was a private company,

0:24:10.040 --> 0:24:12.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean as a publicly traded company, but a private

0:24:12.280 --> 0:24:15.359
<v Speaker 1>sector entity landing on the Moon. They did receive some

0:24:15.520 --> 0:24:18.720
<v Speaker 1>development funding from NASA a little less than one hundred

0:24:18.720 --> 0:24:21.440
<v Speaker 1>and eighteen million dollars. They also had to raise their

0:24:21.440 --> 0:24:24.080
<v Speaker 1>own capital in order to get the rest of the

0:24:24.080 --> 0:24:26.000
<v Speaker 1>funding they needed to make this mission work.

0:24:26.760 --> 0:24:29.199
<v Speaker 3>We now see a market cap of more than a

0:24:29.240 --> 0:24:32.320
<v Speaker 3>billion for intuitive machines, and we've seen it rise about

0:24:32.320 --> 0:24:34.160
<v Speaker 3>two hundred and twenty six million dollars in the day.

0:24:34.200 --> 0:24:38.920
<v Speaker 4>We're twenty eight percent. Where does this all point us next?

0:24:39.040 --> 0:24:42.720
<v Speaker 3>What are we anticipating that is achieved after this? We

0:24:42.800 --> 0:24:46.399
<v Speaker 3>understand about well, south pole, more of the moon, but

0:24:46.720 --> 0:24:48.680
<v Speaker 3>what are the next situations of the space economy?

0:24:49.600 --> 0:24:49.840
<v Speaker 4>Right?

0:24:49.880 --> 0:24:52.400
<v Speaker 1>So there are really two goals with this mission. One

0:24:52.440 --> 0:24:55.960
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned this was the first mission to land closest

0:24:55.960 --> 0:24:58.200
<v Speaker 1>to the south pole of the Moon. India also landing

0:24:58.240 --> 0:25:01.760
<v Speaker 1>near the south pole but an enticing place for NASA

0:25:01.800 --> 0:25:04.199
<v Speaker 1>because it's thought to have water ice, and so they

0:25:04.280 --> 0:25:06.080
<v Speaker 1>are curious to see if we can go there to

0:25:06.160 --> 0:25:08.960
<v Speaker 1>mine that water ice. It's where NASA hopes to land

0:25:09.040 --> 0:25:10.760
<v Speaker 1>future astronauts.

0:25:10.520 --> 0:25:12.000
<v Speaker 8>When they do return to the Moon.

0:25:12.359 --> 0:25:13.679
<v Speaker 10>But the goal is also.

0:25:13.520 --> 0:25:17.560
<v Speaker 1>To spur a commercial lunar economy. So the idea is

0:25:17.600 --> 0:25:21.280
<v Speaker 1>that NASA wanted to trigger the development of this commercial

0:25:21.320 --> 0:25:23.679
<v Speaker 1>lander so that the company could have a way to

0:25:23.720 --> 0:25:27.359
<v Speaker 1>transport NASA payloads, but then also in turn use that

0:25:27.480 --> 0:25:31.760
<v Speaker 1>lander to create and note their own business transporting experiments

0:25:31.760 --> 0:25:35.040
<v Speaker 1>and payloads to the Moon. So that lander had NASA

0:25:35.040 --> 0:25:38.040
<v Speaker 1>payloads on it, but it also had commercial customer payloads

0:25:38.080 --> 0:25:39.879
<v Speaker 1>on it. So the idea is to see, you know,

0:25:39.960 --> 0:25:42.240
<v Speaker 1>can that be a sustainable business moving forward?

0:25:42.560 --> 0:25:45.600
<v Speaker 3>And who knows what Jeff Coon's piece is going to

0:25:45.600 --> 0:25:47.160
<v Speaker 3>be doing rolling around on the Moon.

0:25:47.000 --> 0:25:47.760
<v Speaker 4>After this Lord?

0:25:47.880 --> 0:25:51.200
<v Speaker 3>But who are the other names out there? We put

0:25:51.320 --> 0:25:54.000
<v Speaker 3>so much of our exuberance around the space economy on

0:25:54.080 --> 0:25:56.959
<v Speaker 3>SpaceX call still a private company. We now look at

0:25:57.000 --> 0:25:59.840
<v Speaker 3>Intuitive Machines entering on Lexican, but who else has been

0:25:59.840 --> 0:26:02.080
<v Speaker 3>now them making moves and sometimes failing at that?

0:26:03.440 --> 0:26:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Right, So another company kind of considered Intuitive Machines's rival.

0:26:07.840 --> 0:26:11.280
<v Speaker 1>It was a company called Astrobotic. They actually launch launched

0:26:11.280 --> 0:26:13.960
<v Speaker 1>their lander first. They were another partner with NASA's through

0:26:14.000 --> 0:26:17.040
<v Speaker 1>the same program that Intuitive Machines was a partner with.

0:26:17.359 --> 0:26:20.480
<v Speaker 1>They launched in January, but unfortunately they suffered an engine

0:26:20.480 --> 0:26:24.080
<v Speaker 1>failure right after getting to space and ultimately precluded their

0:26:24.160 --> 0:26:26.600
<v Speaker 1>chances of actually attempting to touch down.

0:26:26.440 --> 0:26:28.400
<v Speaker 8>On the Moon, and they ended up bringing back that.

0:26:28.440 --> 0:26:31.800
<v Speaker 1>Lander to Earth and disposing it in the atmosphere. But

0:26:31.960 --> 0:26:34.760
<v Speaker 1>they're going to try again. They have another mission lined up.

0:26:34.760 --> 0:26:38.320
<v Speaker 1>Intuitive Machines has more missions lined up. There's another company,

0:26:37.840 --> 0:26:42.919
<v Speaker 1>Firefly Aerospace, that is also partnering with NASA. So NASA

0:26:43.000 --> 0:26:45.800
<v Speaker 1>is looking to you know, dole out funding to those

0:26:45.840 --> 0:26:47.919
<v Speaker 1>that really do want to make a business going to

0:26:47.960 --> 0:26:50.760
<v Speaker 1>the Moon. There are plenty of companies that are interested.

0:26:50.920 --> 0:26:53.879
<v Speaker 1>And you know, as this return to the Moon gets

0:26:54.119 --> 0:26:56.600
<v Speaker 1>more mature, I feel like there's going to be even

0:26:56.600 --> 0:26:58.480
<v Speaker 1>more opportunities for companies.

0:26:58.080 --> 0:27:00.359
<v Speaker 4>To get into the game. And long Golash going to

0:27:00.359 --> 0:27:01.560
<v Speaker 4>turn to you in those moments.

0:27:01.600 --> 0:27:04.320
<v Speaker 3>We thank you so much for talking us through well

0:27:04.440 --> 0:27:07.000
<v Speaker 3>really what it was meant by yesterday's landing. Meanwhile, coming

0:27:07.080 --> 0:27:10.640
<v Speaker 3>up we'll have all the details into how disputes within Klana.

0:27:11.000 --> 0:27:13.359
<v Speaker 3>That's of course, the fintech over in Europe has spilled

0:27:13.359 --> 0:27:16.600
<v Speaker 3>over into a high profile VC drama. It's coming up

0:27:16.600 --> 0:27:19.879
<v Speaker 3>next meanwhile, talking a drama. Unfortunately, there is some among

0:27:19.960 --> 0:27:22.560
<v Speaker 3>Rivian shares. Check this out in terms of a long

0:27:22.640 --> 0:27:26.560
<v Speaker 3>term share price chart of Rivian down almost ninety percent.

0:27:27.080 --> 0:27:30.399
<v Speaker 3>Of course, this on the back of some lackluster earnings

0:27:30.440 --> 0:27:32.479
<v Speaker 3>that were just posted after the bell on Wednesday, and

0:27:32.600 --> 0:27:34.320
<v Speaker 3>yesterday the stock fell hard as they said they were

0:27:34.320 --> 0:27:36.080
<v Speaker 3>going to be and letting go of.

0:27:36.000 --> 0:27:38.000
<v Speaker 4>Some staff as well. From New York.

0:27:38.560 --> 0:27:53.920
<v Speaker 3>This will be med technology. We're going to get into

0:27:53.920 --> 0:27:55.840
<v Speaker 3>a bit of a VC drama brewing at the moment.

0:27:55.880 --> 0:28:00.440
<v Speaker 3>Sequoia Capital has named a new board member for fintech Klana. Now,

0:28:00.440 --> 0:28:03.119
<v Speaker 3>this is an effort to a conflict between Well the

0:28:03.200 --> 0:28:06.240
<v Speaker 3>VC firm is from a partner Michael Moritz and Ashley

0:28:06.600 --> 0:28:09.200
<v Speaker 3>Well issues between two of the founders of Klana too,

0:28:09.520 --> 0:28:12.119
<v Speaker 3>Hitch help break it all down. Kind of extraordinary story

0:28:12.320 --> 0:28:15.000
<v Speaker 3>bringing baxst to Sarah McBride. So what's going on? What

0:28:15.119 --> 0:28:18.240
<v Speaker 3>was the spark of the issue that's occurred with Klana?

0:28:19.359 --> 0:28:23.000
<v Speaker 2>Oh, Caroline, it is such a mess. So what happened

0:28:23.080 --> 0:28:25.560
<v Speaker 2>is a little bit unclear, but it seems that there

0:28:25.640 --> 0:28:31.040
<v Speaker 2>was some sort of dispute at Klarna about a governance

0:28:31.240 --> 0:28:38.240
<v Speaker 2>or control issue and Sequoia Capital's partner, who was on

0:28:38.280 --> 0:28:44.560
<v Speaker 2>the board, Matt Miller, saw things one way and Michael Moritz,

0:28:44.640 --> 0:28:48.800
<v Speaker 2>a legendary VC who was until very recently a partner

0:28:48.920 --> 0:28:54.040
<v Speaker 2>at Sequoia, side another way. And the upshot is that

0:28:54.080 --> 0:28:57.600
<v Speaker 2>Michael Morritz still has his board seat. He now represents

0:28:57.680 --> 0:29:04.080
<v Speaker 2>a related firm called Sequoia Heritage and Matthew Miller, the

0:29:04.120 --> 0:29:08.000
<v Speaker 2>board member from Sequoia Capital, is out. I know that's

0:29:08.040 --> 0:29:11.560
<v Speaker 2>a little head spinning, but hopefully it makes a bit

0:29:11.600 --> 0:29:12.000
<v Speaker 2>of sense.

0:29:12.480 --> 0:29:15.440
<v Speaker 3>And so the drama seems to have unfolded between Sebastian Victor,

0:29:15.480 --> 0:29:19.200
<v Speaker 3>the two co founders, people sort of taking side. How

0:29:19.200 --> 0:29:22.840
<v Speaker 3>often or not does sort of drama accursor. It feels

0:29:22.840 --> 0:29:25.719
<v Speaker 3>like it's relatively rare, but of course the money's involved,

0:29:25.760 --> 0:29:27.960
<v Speaker 3>things do get dramatic, right.

0:29:28.200 --> 0:29:33.920
<v Speaker 2>So Klarna is doing very well. It had some hiccups,

0:29:33.960 --> 0:29:37.160
<v Speaker 2>as many companies did over the past couple of years,

0:29:37.200 --> 0:29:42.320
<v Speaker 2>but basically it's a very richly valued company that should

0:29:42.600 --> 0:29:46.600
<v Speaker 2>be headed for an IPO at some point. And when

0:29:46.680 --> 0:29:51.280
<v Speaker 2>this type of drama unfolds, it's usually behind the scenes.

0:29:51.480 --> 0:29:56.280
<v Speaker 2>Whatever disagreements happen at the board level rarely make it

0:29:56.760 --> 0:29:57.840
<v Speaker 2>beyond those doors.

0:29:58.480 --> 0:30:00.120
<v Speaker 4>And then when they do.

0:30:00.320 --> 0:30:05.880
<v Speaker 2>To have two partners affiliated so closely with one firm

0:30:06.200 --> 0:30:09.880
<v Speaker 2>have a dispute like this is almost unheard of. So

0:30:10.400 --> 0:30:14.600
<v Speaker 2>people are surprised it happened, but more than anything, they're

0:30:14.720 --> 0:30:19.000
<v Speaker 2>surprised at how word of it became so public and

0:30:19.200 --> 0:30:22.920
<v Speaker 2>the CEO ended up having to fly to Silicon Valley

0:30:23.400 --> 0:30:27.640
<v Speaker 2>to make amends and smooth things over with Sequoia. Sequoias

0:30:27.720 --> 0:30:31.320
<v Speaker 2>has had to appoint a new board member. It's all

0:30:31.360 --> 0:30:33.080
<v Speaker 2>gotten unusually messy.

0:30:33.200 --> 0:30:36.120
<v Speaker 3>And all of the time, where Sequoia itself is transitioning

0:30:36.200 --> 0:30:39.240
<v Speaker 3>and having new leadership and splitting from its China division,

0:30:39.280 --> 0:30:41.600
<v Speaker 3>there was a whole host of stories going on on

0:30:41.720 --> 0:30:43.920
<v Speaker 3>your side of the world right now, Sarah McBride, we're

0:30:43.920 --> 0:30:45.920
<v Speaker 3>so pleasy you're able to bring it to us, the

0:30:45.960 --> 0:30:49.000
<v Speaker 3>inside trank you. Now, let's stick with VC maybe a

0:30:49.160 --> 0:30:51.680
<v Speaker 3>slightly calmer part of it at the moment, and we're

0:30:51.680 --> 0:30:54.560
<v Speaker 3>pleased to welcome Jet Fine onto the show for VC Spotlight.

0:30:54.600 --> 0:30:56.680
<v Speaker 3>Let's actually talk about the investments being made at the moment.

0:30:56.760 --> 0:30:58.160
<v Speaker 3>Let's talk about the bread and butter of what you

0:30:58.280 --> 0:31:00.360
<v Speaker 3>up to a headline benches. It is wonderful to have

0:31:00.440 --> 0:31:02.400
<v Speaker 3>you with us, Jet, and one I've had time and

0:31:02.440 --> 0:31:05.160
<v Speaker 3>time again, an interestingly quite a lot this week at

0:31:05.200 --> 0:31:08.960
<v Speaker 3>a conference was that consumer tech is dead, don't go

0:31:09.000 --> 0:31:11.560
<v Speaker 3>anywhere near it. That was all twenty ten and onwards.

0:31:11.640 --> 0:31:13.400
<v Speaker 3>And for now we've all got to be in healthcare

0:31:13.480 --> 0:31:17.200
<v Speaker 3>and climate tech and AI of course, but you don't

0:31:17.280 --> 0:31:17.840
<v Speaker 3>think that's the.

0:31:17.800 --> 0:31:20.360
<v Speaker 10>Case, Well, thanks Caroline.

0:31:20.400 --> 0:31:22.440
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, it's a pleasure to be with you this morning.

0:31:22.480 --> 0:31:25.120
<v Speaker 13>Thank you for having me. Yeah, as you mentioned, I'm

0:31:25.120 --> 0:31:28.240
<v Speaker 13>a partner at Headline, and we are a tech enabled

0:31:28.280 --> 0:31:33.560
<v Speaker 13>global mentor capital firm where I focus on consumer oriented investments,

0:31:33.600 --> 0:31:36.560
<v Speaker 13>among other things, and we've had the good fortune over

0:31:36.600 --> 0:31:41.440
<v Speaker 13>the years to lead consumer investments like Go Puff Bumble, Axios,

0:31:41.480 --> 0:31:46.160
<v Speaker 13>The Real Real, Farfetch among others. And listen, you're exactly right,

0:31:46.240 --> 0:31:48.200
<v Speaker 13>you know. To answer your question, I think you have

0:31:48.280 --> 0:31:52.360
<v Speaker 13>to look behind the front page here, a little past

0:31:52.480 --> 0:31:55.160
<v Speaker 13>the rumor mill. You know, if you look at Fang

0:31:55.360 --> 0:31:58.240
<v Speaker 13>for example, Fang is all consumer. In fact, the most

0:31:58.320 --> 0:31:59.680
<v Speaker 13>valuable companies in.

0:31:59.600 --> 0:32:02.000
<v Speaker 4>The world are our.

0:32:01.920 --> 0:32:07.280
<v Speaker 13>Consumer companies, Apple, Amazon, Tesla, Snap, Facebook of course, right,

0:32:07.320 --> 0:32:11.200
<v Speaker 13>and you know, going forward, we think at Headline that

0:32:11.200 --> 0:32:14.840
<v Speaker 13>that will continue to be the case, particularly given this

0:32:15.040 --> 0:32:18.160
<v Speaker 13>generational technology shift with with AI.

0:32:18.880 --> 0:32:22.520
<v Speaker 3>Let's get more specific then, because you mentioned Tesla and Snap,

0:32:22.600 --> 0:32:26.240
<v Speaker 3>but both have faced significant headwinds their own share prices

0:32:26.280 --> 0:32:28.840
<v Speaker 3>and headwinds to ultimately consumer demand for some of their

0:32:28.840 --> 0:32:32.480
<v Speaker 3>products at the moment and stimying growth. When you're looking

0:32:32.480 --> 0:32:34.160
<v Speaker 3>at some of the exits that you've had, I mean,

0:32:34.440 --> 0:32:37.880
<v Speaker 3>really notable companies but Farfetch has had a terrible time

0:32:37.880 --> 0:32:40.680
<v Speaker 3>of it and ultimately sort of big bought out of bankruptcy.

0:32:41.320 --> 0:32:43.440
<v Speaker 4>E commerce may be a hard place to be.

0:32:43.560 --> 0:32:45.400
<v Speaker 3>Where is the place to be when you want to

0:32:45.400 --> 0:32:47.320
<v Speaker 3>have exposure to a consumer that is still out there

0:32:47.320 --> 0:32:48.640
<v Speaker 3>and is still buying some stuff.

0:32:49.760 --> 0:32:53.080
<v Speaker 13>Absolutely, Yeah, it's a great point. Listen, consumer companies that

0:32:53.120 --> 0:32:57.520
<v Speaker 13>have historically relied on paid customer acquisition are facing real headwinds,

0:32:57.520 --> 0:33:00.280
<v Speaker 13>and so you know, what we're quite excited about at

0:33:00.280 --> 0:33:04.760
<v Speaker 13>headline is the opportunity to partner with companies that have

0:33:04.840 --> 0:33:08.440
<v Speaker 13>real distribution advantages. And what I mean by that are

0:33:08.840 --> 0:33:15.840
<v Speaker 13>companies that leverage the benefits of community content, celebrity or creators.

0:33:16.040 --> 0:33:19.040
<v Speaker 13>And we're seeing more and more of those companies come up,

0:33:19.080 --> 0:33:24.400
<v Speaker 13>of course in the world of of TikTok, Timu Shean

0:33:25.000 --> 0:33:30.000
<v Speaker 13>and other companies that leverage those distribution advantages beyond beyond

0:33:30.160 --> 0:33:31.840
<v Speaker 13>solely paid acquisitions.

0:33:32.680 --> 0:33:35.360
<v Speaker 3>So am I anticipating more celebrity beauty brands?

0:33:35.440 --> 0:33:35.600
<v Speaker 9>Is that?

0:33:35.680 --> 0:33:37.000
<v Speaker 3>Is that the way that we're going to be sort

0:33:37.000 --> 0:33:38.920
<v Speaker 3>of seeing this come to life?

0:33:39.600 --> 0:33:42.920
<v Speaker 13>Well, certainly, certainly there will be more. Absolutely, I think

0:33:43.040 --> 0:33:47.080
<v Speaker 13>that's one way that companies can find real distribution is

0:33:47.320 --> 0:33:50.560
<v Speaker 13>utilizing celebrity creators and content and community.

0:33:52.160 --> 0:33:55.360
<v Speaker 3>Well, Jet, we'll see what companies you're backing, watch ones

0:33:55.440 --> 0:33:59.000
<v Speaker 3>manage to find that consumer fit and what celebrities are

0:33:59.080 --> 0:34:01.840
<v Speaker 3>currently bringing things to market headline ventures general partner, Jet

0:34:01.880 --> 0:34:03.320
<v Speaker 3>Fine really great to catch up with you.

0:34:03.520 --> 0:34:04.720
<v Speaker 4>Truly global perspective.

0:34:04.760 --> 0:34:14.120
<v Speaker 3>This company is everywhere in Latin America, Asia, around Europe.

0:34:15.080 --> 0:34:18.680
<v Speaker 3>Let's checking on other earnings today. Carvana shares absolutely rocketing.

0:34:19.040 --> 0:34:22.040
<v Speaker 3>Company reported profits are some past estimates. Managing to avoid

0:34:22.040 --> 0:34:26.080
<v Speaker 3>headwinds from well somewhat circumvent and reduce some of those

0:34:26.080 --> 0:34:28.960
<v Speaker 3>headwinds from high interest rates from inflation. Joining us now

0:34:28.960 --> 0:34:32.440
<v Speaker 3>for more on that earnings report, CEO founder Annie Garcia

0:34:32.560 --> 0:34:36.240
<v Speaker 3>and thirty one percent higher. And you have had to,

0:34:36.320 --> 0:34:39.160
<v Speaker 3>like many in the private market and the public market,

0:34:39.239 --> 0:34:42.080
<v Speaker 3>suddenly shift gears from growth at all costs to profits

0:34:42.080 --> 0:34:44.080
<v Speaker 3>at all costs. What have you been doing to be

0:34:44.120 --> 0:34:46.480
<v Speaker 3>able to prove yourself in this recent report?

0:34:48.160 --> 0:34:50.040
<v Speaker 14>So I think you know it's one of those things

0:34:50.040 --> 0:34:52.160
<v Speaker 14>where you start see results come through pretty quickly, but

0:34:52.200 --> 0:34:53.480
<v Speaker 14>there's a lot of work that goes in for a

0:34:53.480 --> 0:34:56.120
<v Speaker 14>long time before. And so I think you know twenty

0:34:56.120 --> 0:34:58.360
<v Speaker 14>twenty two like it was for so many companies. Was

0:34:58.680 --> 0:35:01.680
<v Speaker 14>a time where the winds shifted pretty quickly for us

0:35:01.719 --> 0:35:04.560
<v Speaker 14>and for everyone else. And I think the team came together,

0:35:04.600 --> 0:35:07.120
<v Speaker 14>we came up with the plan that we thought really

0:35:07.200 --> 0:35:09.719
<v Speaker 14>kind of made sense in that moment with the new

0:35:09.760 --> 0:35:12.400
<v Speaker 14>pressures that were out there in the world. And I

0:35:12.400 --> 0:35:15.080
<v Speaker 14>think the team has just executed incredibly well over the

0:35:15.160 --> 0:35:17.719
<v Speaker 14>last two years, and we're starting to see that now.

0:35:17.920 --> 0:35:20.359
<v Speaker 10>I think the results that we just reported and the results.

0:35:20.000 --> 0:35:21.960
<v Speaker 14>That we see coming in the future are something that

0:35:22.000 --> 0:35:25.319
<v Speaker 14>we're extremely excited about. And it is the result of

0:35:25.360 --> 0:35:27.920
<v Speaker 14>the team coming together and doing incredible work. And so

0:35:28.120 --> 0:35:29.839
<v Speaker 14>thank you to the team. Just cannot thank you enough

0:35:29.880 --> 0:35:30.760
<v Speaker 14>for everything you've done.

0:35:30.880 --> 0:35:33.440
<v Speaker 3>And some of the analysts like William Blair, analysts Sharon

0:35:33.480 --> 0:35:36.240
<v Speaker 3>really talking about the steep increases and profits.

0:35:35.840 --> 0:35:37.720
<v Speaker 4>And the return to unit growth.

0:35:37.920 --> 0:35:40.399
<v Speaker 3>But some more cynical people out there would say, look,

0:35:40.400 --> 0:35:42.399
<v Speaker 3>this thirty percent optic in the stare price is because

0:35:42.440 --> 0:35:44.120
<v Speaker 3>it's just squeezing out some of the shorts and you

0:35:44.160 --> 0:35:46.360
<v Speaker 3>wear a heavily shortened name. What do you say to

0:35:46.360 --> 0:35:48.760
<v Speaker 3>those people who are still standing by betting against your company?

0:35:49.800 --> 0:35:51.880
<v Speaker 14>Oh, well, I think there's room in the world for shorts,

0:35:51.880 --> 0:35:54.400
<v Speaker 14>and I think, you know, it's okay. Skepticism is helpful,

0:35:54.440 --> 0:35:57.360
<v Speaker 14>it creates pressure. I think there was a one of

0:35:57.360 --> 0:36:00.759
<v Speaker 14>the ancient I believe Greek philosophers said, hater's going to

0:36:00.800 --> 0:36:04.240
<v Speaker 14>hate players going to play, But me, I'm just gonna shake, shake, shake.

0:36:04.400 --> 0:36:05.799
<v Speaker 10>Shake it off, shake it off.

0:36:06.120 --> 0:36:08.880
<v Speaker 14>I believe that may have been Aristotle, that may have

0:36:08.920 --> 0:36:10.120
<v Speaker 14>been it could have been Plato too.

0:36:10.120 --> 0:36:10.759
<v Speaker 10>I could be wrong.

0:36:11.280 --> 0:36:12.920
<v Speaker 4>Well, she has a way with words. I will give

0:36:12.920 --> 0:36:13.160
<v Speaker 4>her that.

0:36:13.880 --> 0:36:17.680
<v Speaker 3>I'm interested there and eerie in more seriously, like the

0:36:17.680 --> 0:36:20.920
<v Speaker 3>debt market, that's been a tough space, and we are,

0:36:21.000 --> 0:36:23.360
<v Speaker 3>of course as Bluemberg focused on equity markets.

0:36:23.360 --> 0:36:25.200
<v Speaker 4>We're all focused on bonds in particular.

0:36:25.520 --> 0:36:28.799
<v Speaker 3>How are you thinking about well not having to restructure

0:36:28.960 --> 0:36:31.200
<v Speaker 3>once again, how are you thinking about paying down debt?

0:36:33.160 --> 0:36:34.800
<v Speaker 14>I think, you know, listen, the most important thing that

0:36:34.840 --> 0:36:37.120
<v Speaker 14>we do as companies we deliver great experiences to customers,

0:36:37.160 --> 0:36:38.880
<v Speaker 14>and we grow into this huge opportunity that we have.

0:36:39.960 --> 0:36:42.080
<v Speaker 14>I think it was really hard from the perspective of

0:36:42.080 --> 0:36:44.520
<v Speaker 14>a year ago to see the incredible gains that the

0:36:44.520 --> 0:36:46.960
<v Speaker 14>team has made over the last year. And I think

0:36:46.960 --> 0:36:49.520
<v Speaker 14>that those games were possible because the offering that we

0:36:49.520 --> 0:36:52.040
<v Speaker 14>give to customers is unique. The business that we've built

0:36:52.120 --> 0:36:54.920
<v Speaker 14>is very hard to replicate, and the team that we've

0:36:55.000 --> 0:36:57.480
<v Speaker 14>assembled is incredible. And so I think our job now

0:36:57.560 --> 0:36:58.960
<v Speaker 14>is to take advantage of those things and just keep

0:36:58.960 --> 0:36:59.399
<v Speaker 14>moving forward.

0:36:59.400 --> 0:37:00.760
<v Speaker 10>And I think the rest take care of itself.

0:37:00.880 --> 0:37:02.920
<v Speaker 3>You talk about that team, and I know as a

0:37:02.920 --> 0:37:05.120
<v Speaker 3>business leader, it's incredibly hard to have to think about

0:37:05.160 --> 0:37:07.560
<v Speaker 3>how you scale back or reduce headcount. Is that something

0:37:07.560 --> 0:37:09.600
<v Speaker 3>you're having to think about into the future.

0:37:09.719 --> 0:37:10.719
<v Speaker 4>Is the team where you want it?

0:37:11.880 --> 0:37:12.920
<v Speaker 10>The team's in a great spot.

0:37:13.239 --> 0:37:15.600
<v Speaker 14>I think you know, we, like I said, twenty twenty

0:37:15.640 --> 0:37:17.319
<v Speaker 14>two is a tough time for us, like it was

0:37:17.360 --> 0:37:19.440
<v Speaker 14>for so many companies. We had to make adjustments. The

0:37:19.440 --> 0:37:21.680
<v Speaker 14>team's in a great spot. I think you know. One

0:37:21.719 --> 0:37:24.239
<v Speaker 14>of the things that we did a really I would

0:37:24.320 --> 0:37:26.640
<v Speaker 14>like to say, did a really good job with going

0:37:26.680 --> 0:37:29.080
<v Speaker 14>through that period is we were able to make tough

0:37:29.080 --> 0:37:31.759
<v Speaker 14>decisions and to move forward and to do the hard

0:37:31.760 --> 0:37:33.360
<v Speaker 14>work that had to be done to put ourselves in

0:37:33.400 --> 0:37:35.680
<v Speaker 14>a position to really succeed. And I think this is

0:37:35.680 --> 0:37:38.040
<v Speaker 14>now a team that is battle tested and battle hardened,

0:37:38.760 --> 0:37:40.759
<v Speaker 14>and it's a team that, as I said, I every

0:37:40.760 --> 0:37:42.080
<v Speaker 14>time you bring it up I'm going to just say

0:37:42.080 --> 0:37:43.960
<v Speaker 14>thank you because I could not be more grateful.

0:37:45.040 --> 0:37:48.200
<v Speaker 3>And let's look at ultimately where the consumer is at

0:37:48.239 --> 0:37:51.640
<v Speaker 3>from your perspective, because you have been able to take

0:37:52.040 --> 0:37:54.440
<v Speaker 3>more of a cart for each car that you're shifting,

0:37:54.560 --> 0:37:57.880
<v Speaker 3>but consumers have bought a lot of second hand vehicles

0:37:57.960 --> 0:38:00.960
<v Speaker 3>that we are seeing a more competitive space. How do

0:38:01.080 --> 0:38:03.640
<v Speaker 3>you outperform bill competitors?

0:38:05.400 --> 0:38:07.600
<v Speaker 14>So I think you know, this is a big, mature

0:38:07.600 --> 0:38:10.959
<v Speaker 14>industry right Every year, roughly speaking, there's about forty million

0:38:11.040 --> 0:38:13.359
<v Speaker 14>used cars that are transacted in the US. And that's

0:38:13.360 --> 0:38:15.200
<v Speaker 14>because there's two hundred and seventy million cars out there

0:38:15.280 --> 0:38:17.560
<v Speaker 14>driving around. And as a consumer, all of us, you know,

0:38:17.560 --> 0:38:19.080
<v Speaker 14>we get tired of the car we're driving and we're

0:38:19.080 --> 0:38:20.760
<v Speaker 14>insted in driving a new one.

0:38:21.080 --> 0:38:23.360
<v Speaker 10>And so that pushs us to go do a swap.

0:38:23.520 --> 0:38:25.640
<v Speaker 14>And I think what the entire automotive industry is all

0:38:25.680 --> 0:38:28.320
<v Speaker 14>about is it's about finding those moments where one customer

0:38:28.360 --> 0:38:30.440
<v Speaker 14>wants to switch into the next car and making it

0:38:30.480 --> 0:38:33.680
<v Speaker 14>as simple as possible and is cost efficient as possible

0:38:33.719 --> 0:38:35.880
<v Speaker 14>to get that car from one customer to the next.

0:38:36.520 --> 0:38:38.320
<v Speaker 14>And I think that's what our whole business is designed

0:38:38.320 --> 0:38:40.359
<v Speaker 14>to do. We've built an entirely new supply chain. We've

0:38:40.360 --> 0:38:43.480
<v Speaker 14>built an entirely new transaction capability. It's supported by all

0:38:43.480 --> 0:38:45.360
<v Speaker 14>this technology that we've built to weave it together, so

0:38:45.400 --> 0:38:48.120
<v Speaker 14>it's simple for a customer. And I think as long

0:38:48.160 --> 0:38:51.319
<v Speaker 14>as we keep delivering that experience that gives them the

0:38:51.360 --> 0:38:53.960
<v Speaker 14>best price, the best selection, the best experience, I think

0:38:54.000 --> 0:38:56.120
<v Speaker 14>we're in a really good spot. We grew, you know,

0:38:56.239 --> 0:38:58.840
<v Speaker 14>from a seat of an idea in twenty thirteen to

0:38:58.840 --> 0:39:01.640
<v Speaker 14>where we are today by doing that in a market

0:39:01.640 --> 0:39:02.840
<v Speaker 14>that was relatively flat.

0:39:03.560 --> 0:39:04.399
<v Speaker 10>I think today there.

0:39:04.280 --> 0:39:06.480
<v Speaker 14>Are actually, you know, there have been some tailwinds that

0:39:06.520 --> 0:39:10.080
<v Speaker 14>have been nice, and those tailwinds have been lowering car

0:39:10.120 --> 0:39:12.799
<v Speaker 14>prices which were very high for several year period. That

0:39:12.880 --> 0:39:14.239
<v Speaker 14>was tough for a lot of consumers and made it

0:39:14.239 --> 0:39:15.719
<v Speaker 14>hard for them to switch to that next car they

0:39:15.719 --> 0:39:19.000
<v Speaker 14>may have been excited about. So I think, you know, overall,

0:39:19.080 --> 0:39:21.399
<v Speaker 14>our goal is just to keep executing, keep delivering great

0:39:21.400 --> 0:39:24.680
<v Speaker 14>experiences and take market share. And we think secondarily that

0:39:25.360 --> 0:39:27.920
<v Speaker 14>we think secondarily the market will do its thing.

0:39:28.480 --> 0:39:29.680
<v Speaker 4>Market's going to do its thing.

0:39:30.120 --> 0:39:32.960
<v Speaker 3>Caw Vana CEO, you do your thing on TV with us,

0:39:32.960 --> 0:39:36.040
<v Speaker 3>we can so much. Founder Ernie Garcia. We appreciate you

0:39:36.040 --> 0:39:39.040
<v Speaker 3>being with us. We've got some breaking news Jamie Diamond.

0:39:39.120 --> 0:39:40.719
<v Speaker 3>He's been letting go of some shares, one hundred and

0:39:40.719 --> 0:39:44.120
<v Speaker 3>fifty million dollars worth of JP Morgan shares and what.

0:39:44.280 --> 0:39:45.560
<v Speaker 4>Is a first sale.

0:39:45.600 --> 0:39:48.240
<v Speaker 3>His family is selling that amount of the bank stock

0:39:48.960 --> 0:39:51.200
<v Speaker 3>from New York, from San Francisco. That does it for

0:39:51.200 --> 0:39:54.000
<v Speaker 3>this edition of Blue Meg Technology Don't Forget About Podcast