WEBVTT - What is the dark flow?

0:00:08.480 --> 0:00:11.800
<v Speaker 1>Hey, Orge, do you think stuff in science is typically

0:00:11.920 --> 0:00:14.560
<v Speaker 1>well named or sometimes misleading?

0:00:15.160 --> 0:00:17.599
<v Speaker 2>Depends on which science. Do you mean physics? Then no?

0:00:20.079 --> 0:00:21.919
<v Speaker 1>I mean sometimes we do a good job, right, like

0:00:21.960 --> 0:00:22.520
<v Speaker 1>black hole?

0:00:22.800 --> 0:00:25.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? Yeah, those are black and their holes in space.

0:00:25.600 --> 0:00:27.479
<v Speaker 2>So I guess you did good on that one.

0:00:27.880 --> 0:00:30.200
<v Speaker 1>But in other cases you're saying we didn't do as well.

0:00:30.400 --> 0:00:34.320
<v Speaker 2>Well, let's see, how about quark flavors which don't have flavor,

0:00:34.320 --> 0:00:36.960
<v Speaker 2>how about quantum colors which don't have colored?

0:00:37.600 --> 0:00:40.960
<v Speaker 1>All right, that's fair, So let's do a little experiment.

0:00:41.080 --> 0:00:42.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to give you a physics name, and you're

0:00:42.800 --> 0:00:44.919
<v Speaker 1>gonna guess what it means. All right, go for it.

0:00:44.920 --> 0:00:46.400
<v Speaker 1>It's called the dark flow.

0:00:46.640 --> 0:00:49.479
<v Speaker 2>That sounds like maybe a plumbing product to get your

0:00:49.560 --> 0:00:50.440
<v Speaker 2>toilet moving again?

0:00:52.280 --> 0:00:52.560
<v Speaker 1>Nice?

0:00:52.720 --> 0:00:55.240
<v Speaker 2>Did I get that right? Stay tuned and find out

0:00:55.440 --> 0:00:56.680
<v Speaker 2>you have to go with the flow. Is that what

0:00:56.720 --> 0:00:57.120
<v Speaker 2>you're saying?

0:01:12.240 --> 0:01:12.399
<v Speaker 1>Hi?

0:01:12.400 --> 0:01:15.880
<v Speaker 2>I'm Horia mccartoonist and the author of Oliver's Great Big Universe.

0:01:16.040 --> 0:01:18.760
<v Speaker 1>Hi, I'm Daniel. I'm a particle physicist and a professor

0:01:18.760 --> 0:01:21.320
<v Speaker 1>at U see erline, and I hate plumbing projects.

0:01:21.600 --> 0:01:23.800
<v Speaker 2>Who loves plumbing projects? I guess plumbers?

0:01:24.280 --> 0:01:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? Maybe, I mean I hope they love plumbing projects.

0:01:28.400 --> 0:01:29.440
<v Speaker 1>Otherwise it's kind of sad.

0:01:29.520 --> 0:01:31.959
<v Speaker 2>It's probably interesting to them. Sure, But how many plumbing

0:01:31.959 --> 0:01:33.319
<v Speaker 2>projects have you worked on recently?

0:01:33.480 --> 0:01:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Oh? Too many? You know, anytime you have a plumbing project,

0:01:36.319 --> 0:01:40.240
<v Speaker 1>that means bad news. Something's leaking somewhere, something's broken somewhere.

0:01:40.440 --> 0:01:42.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, the joys of home ownership.

0:01:42.319 --> 0:01:43.480
<v Speaker 2>What did you call a plumber?

0:01:43.600 --> 0:01:45.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's like paying somebody to deliver the bad news

0:01:45.800 --> 0:01:46.080
<v Speaker 1>to you.

0:01:46.720 --> 0:01:49.520
<v Speaker 2>Hey, yeah, and then then hopefully they fix it for you.

0:01:49.680 --> 0:01:51.000
<v Speaker 2>What kind of plumbers are you calling?

0:01:52.320 --> 0:01:53.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, they fix it. We had a leak in our

0:01:54.040 --> 0:01:57.160
<v Speaker 1>upstairs bathroom recently and had to tear out and rehab

0:01:57.280 --> 0:01:59.080
<v Speaker 1>all the walls in our garage. It was a big

0:01:59.120 --> 0:01:59.760
<v Speaker 1>pain in the butt.

0:01:59.800 --> 0:02:02.960
<v Speaker 2>Oh boy, what happened? The tub overfluid or something?

0:02:03.040 --> 0:02:04.080
<v Speaker 1>It was a dark flow.

0:02:04.320 --> 0:02:06.640
<v Speaker 2>You took too long of a bath there thinking about physics.

0:02:06.720 --> 0:02:08.760
<v Speaker 1>I was dunking stuff in the bathtub hoping for a

0:02:08.840 --> 0:02:10.639
<v Speaker 1>Eureka moment, and it just didn't happen.

0:02:10.840 --> 0:02:13.680
<v Speaker 2>It just didn't happen. You didn't figure out how bullyiancy works.

0:02:15.240 --> 0:02:17.280
<v Speaker 1>No, it's too complicated for a particle physicists.

0:02:18.080 --> 0:02:21.040
<v Speaker 2>Too many particles in a tub of water. But anyways,

0:02:21.080 --> 0:02:23.600
<v Speaker 2>welcome to our podcast Daniel and Jorge Explain the Universe,

0:02:23.639 --> 0:02:26.079
<v Speaker 2>a production of iHeartRadio.

0:02:25.400 --> 0:02:27.800
<v Speaker 1>In which we teach you to think like a physicist

0:02:27.840 --> 0:02:30.480
<v Speaker 1>instead of a plumber. Don't dunk stuff in a tub

0:02:30.520 --> 0:02:33.560
<v Speaker 1>of water, but immerse your brain in the mysteries of

0:02:33.680 --> 0:02:36.320
<v Speaker 1>the universe and try to learn how the universe works.

0:02:36.320 --> 0:02:38.440
<v Speaker 1>By Oz most is hanging out with us as we

0:02:38.480 --> 0:02:41.120
<v Speaker 1>talk and joke about everything that's out there in the

0:02:41.200 --> 0:02:43.679
<v Speaker 1>universe and try to explain all of it to you.

0:02:43.880 --> 0:02:45.640
<v Speaker 2>That's right. We try to fill the tub in your

0:02:45.680 --> 0:02:49.440
<v Speaker 2>mind of knowledge and wonder until it overflows and hopefully

0:02:50.200 --> 0:02:51.919
<v Speaker 2>maybe leaks into your garage a little bit.

0:02:53.720 --> 0:02:55.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, in that scenario, maybe a plumbing project is

0:02:55.840 --> 0:02:57.880
<v Speaker 1>good news because you got to rip everything out and

0:02:57.919 --> 0:03:00.400
<v Speaker 1>build up a new understanding of the universe. That's what

0:03:00.440 --> 0:03:02.079
<v Speaker 1>I'm always saying I want to do. Wait.

0:03:02.080 --> 0:03:04.160
<v Speaker 2>Wait, you're saying the universe is plumbing.

0:03:05.120 --> 0:03:07.959
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying, our mental understanding of how the universe works

0:03:08.200 --> 0:03:10.399
<v Speaker 1>has plumbing. When you got to tear all that out

0:03:10.440 --> 0:03:12.320
<v Speaker 1>and rebuild it, that means you're coming up with a

0:03:12.400 --> 0:03:16.079
<v Speaker 1>new idea about how the universe works, and that's a revolution.

0:03:15.800 --> 0:03:19.240
<v Speaker 2>Oh wait, what's the plumbing for ideas? Also, what do

0:03:19.240 --> 0:03:20.880
<v Speaker 2>you flush down the toilet of physics?

0:03:21.160 --> 0:03:23.720
<v Speaker 1>Imagine the inside of a physicist mind and model it

0:03:23.760 --> 0:03:26.600
<v Speaker 1>as a bunch of pipes with ideas flushing and flowing

0:03:26.639 --> 0:03:27.320
<v Speaker 1>and swirling.

0:03:28.560 --> 0:03:32.000
<v Speaker 2>I see. I always love physicists sticky pipes themselves in

0:03:32.080 --> 0:03:35.040
<v Speaker 2>their brains. But aren't physicists sort of the plumbers of

0:03:35.040 --> 0:03:37.200
<v Speaker 2>the universe? Kind of you're trying to figure out how

0:03:37.200 --> 0:03:38.760
<v Speaker 2>the plumbing of the universe works.

0:03:39.000 --> 0:03:42.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, everything in the universe is out there, sloshing around,

0:03:42.240 --> 0:03:45.440
<v Speaker 1>banging it into itself. It's not like a stable situation.

0:03:45.600 --> 0:03:47.360
<v Speaker 1>You look up at the night sky and you might think, Hi,

0:03:47.360 --> 0:03:49.400
<v Speaker 1>everything's just sort of hanging it out. But that's just

0:03:49.440 --> 0:03:53.040
<v Speaker 1>because we live for such brief moments. On cosmic scales,

0:03:53.200 --> 0:03:55.760
<v Speaker 1>if you look at the universe over millions or billions

0:03:55.760 --> 0:03:58.640
<v Speaker 1>of years, you would see things expanding and exploding and

0:03:58.680 --> 0:04:00.160
<v Speaker 1>smashing and flowing.

0:04:00.320 --> 0:04:03.840
<v Speaker 2>Well, usually pipes expanding is not a good sign. Like,

0:04:03.880 --> 0:04:06.360
<v Speaker 2>if your pipe expands, it's probably going to burst.

0:04:06.480 --> 0:04:09.480
<v Speaker 1>M Yes, that's true. Dark energy would be bad news

0:04:09.480 --> 0:04:10.120
<v Speaker 1>for your plumbing.

0:04:10.240 --> 0:04:12.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, better flush it down the toilet or call a

0:04:12.280 --> 0:04:13.560
<v Speaker 2>real professional.

0:04:14.400 --> 0:04:16.520
<v Speaker 1>Someone who has actually useful skills you mean.

0:04:16.520 --> 0:04:20.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, someone who can fix a leak, someone who knows

0:04:20.560 --> 0:04:21.360
<v Speaker 2>how to use a wrench.

0:04:22.160 --> 0:04:24.919
<v Speaker 1>You mean not a physicist and not a cartoonist.

0:04:24.440 --> 0:04:26.719
<v Speaker 2>No, but an engineer. Maybe I'm also an engineer. I

0:04:26.760 --> 0:04:27.360
<v Speaker 2>have that skill.

0:04:27.720 --> 0:04:29.640
<v Speaker 1>So you tackle the plumbing projects in your house to

0:04:29.680 --> 0:04:30.640
<v Speaker 1>do you call it professional?

0:04:30.839 --> 0:04:33.280
<v Speaker 2>Sometimes I do fix it. Yeah, I fix my washing

0:04:33.320 --> 0:04:36.280
<v Speaker 2>machine the other day. I was pretty proud of myself.

0:04:36.200 --> 0:04:37.599
<v Speaker 1>My kicking it and swearing at it.

0:04:38.200 --> 0:04:41.000
<v Speaker 2>No, but looking it up on YouTube and looking at

0:04:41.000 --> 0:04:44.120
<v Speaker 2>a video of how to replace the little valve there inside.

0:04:44.279 --> 0:04:45.520
<v Speaker 2>We're all YouTube engineers.

0:04:45.560 --> 0:04:47.520
<v Speaker 1>Did you type how to replace that little valve there

0:04:47.560 --> 0:04:49.160
<v Speaker 1>into Google and just follow the instructions?

0:04:49.520 --> 0:04:49.599
<v Speaker 3>No?

0:04:49.680 --> 0:04:51.800
<v Speaker 2>I think I just typed the model of my dishwasher,

0:04:51.839 --> 0:04:54.320
<v Speaker 2>and then, you know, helpfully, a lot of people out

0:04:54.320 --> 0:04:57.360
<v Speaker 2>there have posted videos about it. I had to order apart,

0:04:57.720 --> 0:05:02.760
<v Speaker 2>pulled it apart. Surprisingly, nothing exploded.

0:05:02.960 --> 0:05:03.400
<v Speaker 1>So far.

0:05:03.640 --> 0:05:04.080
<v Speaker 2>That's right.

0:05:04.120 --> 0:05:07.040
<v Speaker 1>So far the Jorge has mastered his washing machine and

0:05:07.080 --> 0:05:09.400
<v Speaker 1>the plumbing of his house. Physicists are still trying to

0:05:09.400 --> 0:05:11.480
<v Speaker 1>figure out how the universe out there works.

0:05:11.720 --> 0:05:14.039
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, because it is an amazing universe full of what

0:05:14.200 --> 0:05:18.240
<v Speaker 2>seems like internal plumbing where forces and things like particles

0:05:18.279 --> 0:05:21.080
<v Speaker 2>and quantum fields all flow around and flush together and

0:05:21.080 --> 0:05:23.240
<v Speaker 2>get mixed up and flow from one side to the other.

0:05:23.400 --> 0:05:25.800
<v Speaker 1>There's all sorts of stuff involved. There's normal matter, there's

0:05:25.880 --> 0:05:29.640
<v Speaker 1>dark matter, there's dark energy. There's the expansion of the universe.

0:05:29.680 --> 0:05:32.080
<v Speaker 1>There's the shape of the universe, in the size of

0:05:32.120 --> 0:05:34.760
<v Speaker 1>the universe, all of which play a role in what's

0:05:34.800 --> 0:05:35.800
<v Speaker 1>going on out there.

0:05:35.920 --> 0:05:37.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we've learned a lot about the universe, but there's

0:05:37.760 --> 0:05:41.200
<v Speaker 2>still a lot we don't know, big giant concepts that

0:05:41.279 --> 0:05:43.800
<v Speaker 2>are still a big mystery. So today on the podcast,

0:05:43.880 --> 0:05:53.440
<v Speaker 2>we'll be tackling the question what is the dark flow? Now,

0:05:53.480 --> 0:05:55.400
<v Speaker 2>this is not related to on flow, is it.

0:05:55.480 --> 0:05:58.080
<v Speaker 1>Well, there are a lot of bodily functions that do flow,

0:05:58.279 --> 0:06:01.400
<v Speaker 1>but we are strictly a physics podcast asked not biology.

0:06:01.960 --> 0:06:04.040
<v Speaker 2>Although putting the word dark in front of it it

0:06:04.080 --> 0:06:06.520
<v Speaker 2>does make me think of toilet functions.

0:06:07.640 --> 0:06:09.719
<v Speaker 1>There are a lot of dark matters that get flushed

0:06:09.720 --> 0:06:10.640
<v Speaker 1>down the toilet, that's true.

0:06:10.720 --> 0:06:12.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, a lot of dark matter that requires a lot

0:06:12.440 --> 0:06:15.320
<v Speaker 2>of dark energy. Especially if you haven't been eating fiber.

0:06:16.880 --> 0:06:18.720
<v Speaker 1>When your plumber is telling you you need a new diet,

0:06:18.800 --> 0:06:20.320
<v Speaker 1>then you definitely have a problem.

0:06:20.920 --> 0:06:24.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, aren't doctors sort of like body plumbers?

0:06:24.680 --> 0:06:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Hmmm, yeah, exactly. Yeah, the digestive system sometimes needs a

0:06:28.480 --> 0:06:29.080
<v Speaker 1>new valves.

0:06:29.120 --> 0:06:31.800
<v Speaker 2>But this is an intriguing name for a concept, that

0:06:31.960 --> 0:06:35.240
<v Speaker 2>dark flow. And so as usual, we were wondering how

0:06:35.240 --> 0:06:38.360
<v Speaker 2>many people out there had heard of this concept or

0:06:38.640 --> 0:06:40.560
<v Speaker 2>have any idea what it could meet.

0:06:40.640 --> 0:06:42.920
<v Speaker 1>Thanks to all the volunteers who answered this question. If

0:06:42.920 --> 0:06:45.560
<v Speaker 1>it sounds like fun to you to get a dose

0:06:45.600 --> 0:06:48.440
<v Speaker 1>of random physics questions in your inbox every week, right

0:06:48.520 --> 0:06:51.320
<v Speaker 1>to me too, questions at Danielandhorghey dot com.

0:06:51.360 --> 0:06:52.960
<v Speaker 2>So think about it for a second. What do you

0:06:53.000 --> 0:06:56.280
<v Speaker 2>think is the dark flow? Here's what people have to say.

0:06:56.440 --> 0:06:59.600
<v Speaker 3>That sounds like it has to do with dark energy

0:07:00.200 --> 0:07:05.520
<v Speaker 3>and or dark matter and it's relative distribution through the

0:07:05.600 --> 0:07:07.080
<v Speaker 3>cosmos over time.

0:07:07.520 --> 0:07:09.080
<v Speaker 1>I want to say, has something to do with like

0:07:09.360 --> 0:07:14.360
<v Speaker 1>dark matter flowing between stars or galaxies, or like how

0:07:14.360 --> 0:07:17.040
<v Speaker 1>we have a solar wind, so like a dark matter wind.

0:07:17.320 --> 0:07:19.680
<v Speaker 2>All right, I'm going to go with Batman as well.

0:07:20.840 --> 0:07:23.800
<v Speaker 2>It's like when Batman's in a state where he's totally

0:07:23.840 --> 0:07:26.880
<v Speaker 2>concentrated in his crime fighting, it's just you know, having

0:07:27.200 --> 0:07:29.120
<v Speaker 2>the artistic flow of fighting crime.

0:07:29.200 --> 0:07:31.480
<v Speaker 1>At least it would be something new in the Batman story.

0:07:31.520 --> 0:07:33.800
<v Speaker 1>I feel like Batman is just the same story over

0:07:33.880 --> 0:07:34.600
<v Speaker 1>and over again.

0:07:34.720 --> 0:07:37.040
<v Speaker 2>Oh boy, are we're going to get into Batman in

0:07:37.080 --> 0:07:41.120
<v Speaker 2>this episode? How long is this episode? It sounds like

0:07:41.160 --> 0:07:42.400
<v Speaker 2>you've thought about Batman a lot.

0:07:42.480 --> 0:07:45.120
<v Speaker 1>I just saw like Batman Year one rebooted. It's like,

0:07:45.160 --> 0:07:46.760
<v Speaker 1>how many times can you go back and tell the

0:07:46.760 --> 0:07:49.840
<v Speaker 1>same story about his parents getting shot and he's a

0:07:49.920 --> 0:07:53.280
<v Speaker 1>dark soul? Dot dot dot, Like, come up with something new, people, Well,

0:07:53.240 --> 0:07:54.880
<v Speaker 1>do you mean like change his origin story?

0:07:54.920 --> 0:07:55.840
<v Speaker 2>Then he wouldn't be Batman.

0:07:56.360 --> 0:08:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Tell us a story about somebody else. Don't just keep

0:08:01.000 --> 0:08:02.080
<v Speaker 1>rehashing the same.

0:08:01.880 --> 0:08:05.400
<v Speaker 2>Ipedi tell us about possum Man.

0:08:05.600 --> 0:08:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly, And squirrel Man squirrel girl is a thing, right.

0:08:09.840 --> 0:08:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Ryan North writes that it's great.

0:08:11.480 --> 0:08:17.119
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, But anyways, without getting too dark here about

0:08:17.160 --> 0:08:21.239
<v Speaker 2>comic books, this is apparently a real physics concept, dark flow.

0:08:21.400 --> 0:08:24.440
<v Speaker 1>It is a real physics concept, and it's kind of

0:08:24.480 --> 0:08:27.520
<v Speaker 1>connected to dark matter and dark energy, but it's neither

0:08:27.720 --> 0:08:31.600
<v Speaker 1>of those things. It's more related to the overall expansion

0:08:31.640 --> 0:08:33.760
<v Speaker 1>and flow of galaxies in the universe.

0:08:34.600 --> 0:08:37.960
<v Speaker 2>I wonder if maybe you've overused the word dark in

0:08:38.000 --> 0:08:40.560
<v Speaker 2>physics that's a dark thought, yeah, because people think it's

0:08:40.600 --> 0:08:42.680
<v Speaker 2>just all connected. If you use the same word for

0:08:42.760 --> 0:08:44.160
<v Speaker 2>the set for different things.

0:08:44.040 --> 0:08:46.720
<v Speaker 1>You're absolutely right. People confuse dark matter and dark energy

0:08:46.840 --> 0:08:49.320
<v Speaker 1>all the time because they're both called dark. Really, what

0:08:49.360 --> 0:08:51.719
<v Speaker 1>we mean by dark is we don't understand this. It's

0:08:51.840 --> 0:08:53.920
<v Speaker 1>mysterious and unknown.

0:08:53.720 --> 0:08:56.360
<v Speaker 2>And invisible, right that you can't see it in space.

0:08:56.440 --> 0:08:59.600
<v Speaker 2>M hmm, yeah, exactly, all right, Well, Daniel step us

0:08:59.600 --> 0:09:03.320
<v Speaker 2>through this. So what is the dark flow? What's exactly

0:09:03.480 --> 0:09:06.160
<v Speaker 2>flowing in the universe and where is it flowing too

0:09:06.400 --> 0:09:07.000
<v Speaker 2>or down too?

0:09:07.160 --> 0:09:09.320
<v Speaker 1>That's part of the question. How is the universe flowing

0:09:09.360 --> 0:09:12.480
<v Speaker 1>and where is it flowing to? So to understand the

0:09:12.559 --> 0:09:15.280
<v Speaker 1>dark flow, we have to think about the expansion of

0:09:15.320 --> 0:09:18.440
<v Speaker 1>the universe, like where all the galaxies are going, because

0:09:18.440 --> 0:09:20.079
<v Speaker 1>the dark flow is a mystery that sort of sits

0:09:20.160 --> 0:09:23.040
<v Speaker 1>on top of our current understanding of the expansion of

0:09:23.080 --> 0:09:25.880
<v Speaker 1>the universe, how all the galaxies are moving away from

0:09:25.920 --> 0:09:26.320
<v Speaker 1>each other.

0:09:26.440 --> 0:09:29.360
<v Speaker 2>And like expansion, you mean, like the expansion of space itself,

0:09:29.440 --> 0:09:32.560
<v Speaker 2>Like the space where all the galaxies sit in is expanding,

0:09:32.559 --> 0:09:33.720
<v Speaker 2>It's getting bigger and bigger.

0:09:33.840 --> 0:09:38.760
<v Speaker 1>Exactly, space is being created between galaxies, which effectively increases

0:09:38.880 --> 0:09:42.680
<v Speaker 1>the distance between those galaxies, and that's the expansion of

0:09:42.720 --> 0:09:46.400
<v Speaker 1>the universe, which is a really interesting and fascinating history. Right.

0:09:46.400 --> 0:09:49.600
<v Speaker 1>We know that the universe expanded very quickly early.

0:09:49.360 --> 0:09:51.640
<v Speaker 2>On, that's the Big Bang, right, and inflation.

0:09:52.000 --> 0:09:54.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, loosely speaking, though we don't understand what caused that

0:09:54.840 --> 0:09:58.600
<v Speaker 1>initial expansion. And then after that period things were still expanding,

0:09:58.880 --> 0:10:01.400
<v Speaker 1>but the signs sort of flow. The universe took its

0:10:01.400 --> 0:10:04.040
<v Speaker 1>foot off the gas and started hitting the brake. So

0:10:04.240 --> 0:10:07.280
<v Speaker 1>still expanding, but now it was decelerating. There's all this

0:10:07.400 --> 0:10:09.720
<v Speaker 1>mass in the universe that was starting to slow down

0:10:09.760 --> 0:10:13.200
<v Speaker 1>the expansion. So universe still getting bigger, space still getting

0:10:13.200 --> 0:10:15.920
<v Speaker 1>created between the galaxies, but at a lower.

0:10:15.720 --> 0:10:19.400
<v Speaker 2>Rate now, meaning like the mass of the stuff in

0:10:19.440 --> 0:10:22.959
<v Speaker 2>the universe was somehow slowing down the expansion. Why was that?

0:10:23.200 --> 0:10:26.320
<v Speaker 2>Was it like the gravity of the stuff or just

0:10:26.440 --> 0:10:29.880
<v Speaker 2>the having stuff in space makes it not expand.

0:10:29.679 --> 0:10:32.960
<v Speaker 1>That's just the gravity, right. What determines whether space is

0:10:33.040 --> 0:10:37.360
<v Speaker 1>expanding or contracting, and whether it's accelerating or decelerating is

0:10:37.400 --> 0:10:39.760
<v Speaker 1>the amount of stuff in space, like the matter density,

0:10:39.840 --> 0:10:42.439
<v Speaker 1>and that sends to pull stuff together. And then also

0:10:42.480 --> 0:10:45.040
<v Speaker 1>the shape of the universe, is it flat, is it negative?

0:10:45.120 --> 0:10:48.120
<v Speaker 1>Is it open? And the amount of dark energy which

0:10:48.160 --> 0:10:50.880
<v Speaker 1>is pushing things out and accelerating things. Early on in

0:10:50.920 --> 0:10:53.400
<v Speaker 1>the universe, there really wasn't a whole lot of dark energy,

0:10:53.440 --> 0:10:57.079
<v Speaker 1>and so matter dominated and it was slowing down that expansion.

0:10:57.760 --> 0:11:01.480
<v Speaker 1>But because it was still expanding, and as the universe expands,

0:11:01.520 --> 0:11:04.920
<v Speaker 1>it makes more dark energy because dark energy doesn't get diluted,

0:11:05.000 --> 0:11:08.000
<v Speaker 1>and then dark energy makes the universe expand more. That

0:11:08.040 --> 0:11:12.240
<v Speaker 1>continuing expansion, even though it was decelerating, made more dark energy,

0:11:12.480 --> 0:11:16.520
<v Speaker 1>which turned things around again back to acceleration. So we

0:11:16.559 --> 0:11:20.800
<v Speaker 1>had constant expansion, but we had like initial acceleration, then deceleration,

0:11:21.200 --> 0:11:23.640
<v Speaker 1>and now for the last five or six billion years

0:11:23.920 --> 0:11:27.000
<v Speaker 1>we've had acceleration. Again that's dark energy.

0:11:27.559 --> 0:11:29.680
<v Speaker 2>So it's been sort of a roller coaster ride for

0:11:29.720 --> 0:11:33.120
<v Speaker 2>the universe, right, Like it stressed out really fast and

0:11:33.160 --> 0:11:35.880
<v Speaker 2>then its slowed down and now it's picking up speed

0:11:35.880 --> 0:11:39.040
<v Speaker 2>again and potentially it's going to keep picking up speed

0:11:39.080 --> 0:11:42.040
<v Speaker 2>until it grows it and super duper fast rate.

0:11:42.280 --> 0:11:44.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we don't know what the future holds because we

0:11:44.200 --> 0:11:47.640
<v Speaker 1>don't really understand dark energy like at all. If this

0:11:47.760 --> 0:11:50.760
<v Speaker 1>simple model of dark energy is just like some energy

0:11:50.800 --> 0:11:54.320
<v Speaker 1>that permeates space and causes the expansion of the universe

0:11:54.360 --> 0:11:57.320
<v Speaker 1>to accelerate. Is valid, then yeah, I'll just keep going

0:11:57.360 --> 0:11:59.760
<v Speaker 1>forever and things will get more and more distant. Space

0:11:59.800 --> 0:12:04.560
<v Speaker 1>will continue to expand between galaxies, creating vaster and vaster

0:12:04.679 --> 0:12:09.000
<v Speaker 1>distances between superclusters which will collapse into supermassive black holes.

0:12:09.400 --> 0:12:11.640
<v Speaker 1>And that's sort of the far future of the universe.

0:12:11.760 --> 0:12:14.440
<v Speaker 1>And we're talking about this today because this expansion of

0:12:14.480 --> 0:12:17.959
<v Speaker 1>the universe, this creation of space between galaxies, is sometimes

0:12:18.000 --> 0:12:20.320
<v Speaker 1>called by astronomers the Hubble flow.

0:12:20.720 --> 0:12:23.520
<v Speaker 2>Now, first of all, I guess this expansion of space

0:12:23.600 --> 0:12:27.120
<v Speaker 2>is happening everywhere, all at once, the same everywhere, or

0:12:27.160 --> 0:12:29.040
<v Speaker 2>does it happen more in certain spots.

0:12:29.440 --> 0:12:31.839
<v Speaker 1>We think it happens the same everywhere.

0:12:31.400 --> 0:12:33.520
<v Speaker 2>Even the spots with lots of stuff in it.

0:12:33.640 --> 0:12:35.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's the current idea, and it's sort of a

0:12:35.640 --> 0:12:38.439
<v Speaker 1>theory and an observation. It's sort of the simplest idea

0:12:38.440 --> 0:12:40.160
<v Speaker 1>you could have if you don't know what dark energy is.

0:12:40.559 --> 0:12:43.720
<v Speaker 1>Possibly it's something like a cosmological constant, some energy in

0:12:43.800 --> 0:12:46.480
<v Speaker 1>space that causes this to happen. The simplest thing to

0:12:46.480 --> 0:12:48.600
<v Speaker 1>do is to say, oh, that's just a number it's

0:12:48.600 --> 0:12:51.200
<v Speaker 1>the same everywhere. We don't see any evidence for it

0:12:51.240 --> 0:12:54.680
<v Speaker 1>being different in different parts of the universe. But you know,

0:12:54.760 --> 0:12:57.040
<v Speaker 1>that's a tricky because we can't see it in different

0:12:57.040 --> 0:12:59.160
<v Speaker 1>parts of the universe. At the same time, we can

0:12:59.200 --> 0:13:02.320
<v Speaker 1>see the expansion happening locally now ish we can see

0:13:02.320 --> 0:13:06.080
<v Speaker 1>the expansion happening far away, like a billion years ago.

0:13:06.400 --> 0:13:08.080
<v Speaker 1>It's hard to compare point to point.

0:13:08.480 --> 0:13:10.760
<v Speaker 2>But didn't you say stuff slows down the expansion of

0:13:10.760 --> 0:13:13.360
<v Speaker 2>the universe. So I wonder if in this bus, where

0:13:13.360 --> 0:13:16.000
<v Speaker 2>there's a lot of stuff in it, maybe it's expanding

0:13:17.320 --> 0:13:17.880
<v Speaker 2>less fast.

0:13:18.280 --> 0:13:20.840
<v Speaker 1>Stuff does slow down the expansion of the universe. That

0:13:20.880 --> 0:13:23.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of contributes overall, but everything is actually balanced so

0:13:24.000 --> 0:13:27.240
<v Speaker 1>that overall the universe is flat. But yeah, we don't

0:13:27.360 --> 0:13:30.199
<v Speaker 1>know how stuff and dark energy interact with each other.

0:13:30.320 --> 0:13:33.680
<v Speaker 1>Dark energy is so dilute and so actually weak that

0:13:33.800 --> 0:13:36.360
<v Speaker 1>anywhere there is stuff, you can basically just ignore the

0:13:36.480 --> 0:13:38.839
<v Speaker 1>dark energy and just treat it as if there was

0:13:38.920 --> 0:13:40.920
<v Speaker 1>gravity there, just like from its stuff.

0:13:41.720 --> 0:13:44.440
<v Speaker 2>But I guess as we look around, we see the

0:13:44.480 --> 0:13:46.800
<v Speaker 2>whole of the universe expanding evenly in all.

0:13:46.640 --> 0:13:49.199
<v Speaker 1>Directions exactly, And the idea of the Hubble flow, I

0:13:49.240 --> 0:13:51.559
<v Speaker 1>think It's kind of helpful visually for you to think

0:13:51.600 --> 0:13:53.800
<v Speaker 1>about this because we tend to think about this in

0:13:53.920 --> 0:13:58.320
<v Speaker 1>terms of velocities, Like those galaxies are moving away from

0:13:58.400 --> 0:14:01.319
<v Speaker 1>us at some speed, and we measure those velocities in

0:14:01.400 --> 0:14:04.359
<v Speaker 1>terms of red shift. How the light from those galaxies

0:14:04.440 --> 0:14:07.120
<v Speaker 1>is getting stretched out because those galaxies are moving away

0:14:07.120 --> 0:14:10.160
<v Speaker 1>from us. This is how Hubble sort of initially described it.

0:14:10.400 --> 0:14:13.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, the velocity of these galaxies. It makes more sense,

0:14:13.200 --> 0:14:14.880
<v Speaker 1>it's sort of more natural to think about it in

0:14:15.000 --> 0:14:19.200
<v Speaker 1>terms of general relativity. Has expansion of space itself, That

0:14:19.280 --> 0:14:22.280
<v Speaker 1>those galaxies aren't accelerating away from us, but space is

0:14:22.320 --> 0:14:25.280
<v Speaker 1>being created between us, and so like, there is an

0:14:25.280 --> 0:14:28.040
<v Speaker 1>increased distance between us and those galaxies, but you're not

0:14:28.080 --> 0:14:29.560
<v Speaker 1>feeling any acceleration.

0:14:30.520 --> 0:14:33.200
<v Speaker 2>And you said, this motion is called the Hubble flow.

0:14:33.440 --> 0:14:35.680
<v Speaker 2>What do you mean motion? And why is it called

0:14:35.920 --> 0:14:36.320
<v Speaker 2>a flow?

0:14:36.520 --> 0:14:39.280
<v Speaker 1>So motion there is a bit misleading. The distance between

0:14:39.320 --> 0:14:43.920
<v Speaker 1>the galaxies is increasing, and so for nearby galaxies, you

0:14:43.960 --> 0:14:46.840
<v Speaker 1>can like measure their velocity and say that galaxy has

0:14:46.880 --> 0:14:50.040
<v Speaker 1>a certain velocity in our reference frame. But across really

0:14:50.080 --> 0:14:52.560
<v Speaker 1>really big distances, it doesn't make sense to talk about

0:14:52.800 --> 0:14:55.680
<v Speaker 1>relative velocity for objects that are super far away from

0:14:55.680 --> 0:14:59.520
<v Speaker 1>each other and have different non inertial frames. So astronomers

0:14:59.520 --> 0:15:02.520
<v Speaker 1>sometimes use velocities as a sort of way to talk

0:15:02.560 --> 0:15:05.720
<v Speaker 1>about those objects. But it doesn't actually make any sense

0:15:05.800 --> 0:15:08.080
<v Speaker 1>in terms of general relativity. And why it's called the

0:15:08.120 --> 0:15:10.040
<v Speaker 1>hubble flow. Yeah, it's a good question. I think it

0:15:10.120 --> 0:15:12.640
<v Speaker 1>just helps you visualize how like space is being created

0:15:12.680 --> 0:15:16.000
<v Speaker 1>everywhere and things are being carried along by that stream.

0:15:16.000 --> 0:15:18.600
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so the hubble flow. And then I guess maybe

0:15:18.600 --> 0:15:21.040
<v Speaker 2>it's sort of like the flow of space being created

0:15:21.400 --> 0:15:23.280
<v Speaker 2>pushing everything apart in the universe.

0:15:23.560 --> 0:15:26.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly, And so you can think about those galaxies

0:15:26.280 --> 0:15:28.760
<v Speaker 1>as sort of like sitting in that hubble flow. Space

0:15:28.840 --> 0:15:31.280
<v Speaker 1>is being created, everything is moving further and further apart.

0:15:31.520 --> 0:15:33.880
<v Speaker 1>But there's a wrinkle on top of that motion. Right,

0:15:33.880 --> 0:15:36.360
<v Speaker 1>the hubble flow is not the only thing that's happening

0:15:36.440 --> 0:15:38.920
<v Speaker 1>in the universe. Each of these galaxies is also moving

0:15:39.280 --> 0:15:42.560
<v Speaker 1>relative to the hubble flow. Like people often write in

0:15:42.600 --> 0:15:45.680
<v Speaker 1>and ask, hey, if galaxies are being pushed apart because

0:15:45.680 --> 0:15:47.920
<v Speaker 1>of dark energy, why is the Milky Way going to

0:15:47.960 --> 0:15:50.720
<v Speaker 1>slam into Andromeda? And the answer is that these things

0:15:50.760 --> 0:15:53.280
<v Speaker 1>are moving because of gravity. Right, we talked earlier about

0:15:53.320 --> 0:15:56.479
<v Speaker 1>how dark energy sort of wins over really large distances,

0:15:56.800 --> 0:15:59.760
<v Speaker 1>but for short distances it's too weak. Well, gravity is

0:15:59.800 --> 0:16:03.120
<v Speaker 1>the opposite. Gravity gets really weak at large distances, so

0:16:03.200 --> 0:16:06.600
<v Speaker 1>like between superclusters you hardly feel anything. But short distances,

0:16:06.640 --> 0:16:09.160
<v Speaker 1>like just between two galaxies or between the Sun and

0:16:09.200 --> 0:16:12.560
<v Speaker 1>the Earth, gravity totally dominates dark energy right like.

0:16:12.600 --> 0:16:15.920
<v Speaker 2>Right now, even where I'm sitting, space is expanding, right like,

0:16:15.920 --> 0:16:17.280
<v Speaker 2>if I look at my hand in front of me,

0:16:17.560 --> 0:16:20.240
<v Speaker 2>the space that my hand is in is technically expanding,

0:16:20.280 --> 0:16:22.280
<v Speaker 2>just like the rest of the universe is just expanding

0:16:22.400 --> 0:16:24.800
<v Speaker 2>so little that the force is keeping my hand together

0:16:25.440 --> 0:16:28.520
<v Speaker 2>when over the expansion of the space.

0:16:28.720 --> 0:16:31.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's exactly right. And in the case of your

0:16:31.240 --> 0:16:34.680
<v Speaker 1>body and your hand, the forces are electromagnetic, those chemical

0:16:34.720 --> 0:16:37.600
<v Speaker 1>bonds are tying everything together, So the hubble flow is

0:16:37.640 --> 0:16:40.280
<v Speaker 1>like the gentless little current that your body can overpower.

0:16:40.400 --> 0:16:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Even on the scale of the Solar System, gravity winds

0:16:42.880 --> 0:16:44.960
<v Speaker 1>and the motion of the Earth around the Sun is

0:16:45.040 --> 0:16:47.760
<v Speaker 1>totally dominated just by gravity. Like if it wasn't, we

0:16:47.800 --> 0:16:50.640
<v Speaker 1>might have discovered dark energy much much earlier, because we

0:16:50.640 --> 0:16:53.080
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't have understood the orbits of the planets without it,

0:16:53.120 --> 0:16:55.480
<v Speaker 1>and we have very precise measurements of things happening in

0:16:55.520 --> 0:16:58.600
<v Speaker 1>the Solar System. Any little deviation from gravity we would

0:16:58.640 --> 0:17:01.280
<v Speaker 1>have noticed if it was at all measurable. But dark

0:17:01.400 --> 0:17:03.360
<v Speaker 1>energy is not even measurable on the scale of our

0:17:03.400 --> 0:17:06.200
<v Speaker 1>Solar System. You have to go out to between clusters

0:17:06.240 --> 0:17:08.159
<v Speaker 1>of galaxy in order to see it. So on the

0:17:08.200 --> 0:17:11.360
<v Speaker 1>local scale, dark energy is basically irrelevant, and it's gravity

0:17:11.400 --> 0:17:13.840
<v Speaker 1>that winds over and so these galaxies are moving in

0:17:13.920 --> 0:17:16.440
<v Speaker 1>random directions and feeling tugs from gravity and having all

0:17:16.440 --> 0:17:19.280
<v Speaker 1>sorts of dynamics. We talked about how galaxies merge and

0:17:19.320 --> 0:17:23.240
<v Speaker 1>form together and make superclusters. So this motion relative to

0:17:23.280 --> 0:17:26.639
<v Speaker 1>the hubble flow, that's called the peculiar motion of a galaxy.

0:17:26.920 --> 0:17:29.720
<v Speaker 1>It just means how it's moving relative to the flow

0:17:30.040 --> 0:17:30.440
<v Speaker 1>I see.

0:17:30.520 --> 0:17:33.080
<v Speaker 2>So like, for example, in our Solar System, the space

0:17:33.160 --> 0:17:35.600
<v Speaker 2>is expanding, but our planet is tied to the Sun,

0:17:35.720 --> 0:17:37.560
<v Speaker 2>just like we're tied to the Earth. So like me

0:17:37.680 --> 0:17:40.960
<v Speaker 2>sitting here on Earth and not moving relative to the Earth,

0:17:41.000 --> 0:17:43.960
<v Speaker 2>there is sort of almost like space flowing through me

0:17:44.040 --> 0:17:46.440
<v Speaker 2>as it expands through.

0:17:46.200 --> 0:17:50.320
<v Speaker 1>Me exactly, So your peculiar motion is towards the Earth,

0:17:50.320 --> 0:17:53.360
<v Speaker 1>and the Earth's peculiar motion is towards you. And then

0:17:53.400 --> 0:17:56.320
<v Speaker 1>on the scale of galaxies, like the Milky Way's peculiar

0:17:56.359 --> 0:17:59.639
<v Speaker 1>motion is relative to Andromeda, and Andromeda's peculiar motion is

0:17:59.640 --> 0:18:02.560
<v Speaker 1>relative to the Milky Way. If we only were following

0:18:02.560 --> 0:18:05.040
<v Speaker 1>the Hubble flow and had no peculiar motion, then the

0:18:05.080 --> 0:18:07.760
<v Speaker 1>space between us would be expanding, right, the distance would

0:18:07.760 --> 0:18:10.320
<v Speaker 1>be growing. But it's not. Milky Way Andromeda are coming

0:18:10.359 --> 0:18:13.200
<v Speaker 1>towards each other. And that's the case for lots of galaxies,

0:18:13.400 --> 0:18:15.320
<v Speaker 1>even the ones that aren't going to smash into each other.

0:18:15.440 --> 0:18:18.040
<v Speaker 1>They're all basically pointing in random directions. Very few are

0:18:18.080 --> 0:18:20.359
<v Speaker 1>like at rest relative to the Hubble flow.

0:18:20.640 --> 0:18:23.960
<v Speaker 2>So like our galaxy and Andromena galaxy are moving relative

0:18:24.000 --> 0:18:27.359
<v Speaker 2>to each other. And there's two components to that. You're saying, right, like,

0:18:27.400 --> 0:18:31.800
<v Speaker 2>there's how much we're moving because the space is expanding

0:18:31.840 --> 0:18:35.080
<v Speaker 2>between us, and there's also how much we're moving if

0:18:35.080 --> 0:18:37.119
<v Speaker 2>the space wasn't expanding between us.

0:18:37.240 --> 0:18:39.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's exactly right. You can think about it either

0:18:39.760 --> 0:18:42.160
<v Speaker 1>just from the reference frame of the Milky Way and say, look,

0:18:42.200 --> 0:18:44.879
<v Speaker 1>everything is moving away from us, and then just break

0:18:44.920 --> 0:18:47.520
<v Speaker 1>that motion into two components. Say one of that is

0:18:47.600 --> 0:18:50.119
<v Speaker 1>due to dark energy and the other is everything else

0:18:50.280 --> 0:18:52.359
<v Speaker 1>relative to that, And then a more natural way to

0:18:52.400 --> 0:18:54.639
<v Speaker 1>think about it is, instead of just having one reference

0:18:54.680 --> 0:18:57.600
<v Speaker 1>frame centered at our heads, think about dark energy is

0:18:57.680 --> 0:19:00.880
<v Speaker 1>just creating this like expanding frame, and then think about

0:19:00.880 --> 0:19:03.960
<v Speaker 1>the motion relative to those frames. The hubble flow is

0:19:03.960 --> 0:19:05.879
<v Speaker 1>sort of the most natural way to think about the

0:19:05.880 --> 0:19:09.480
<v Speaker 1>expanding universe. And in that frame they're called co moving frames.

0:19:09.640 --> 0:19:12.600
<v Speaker 1>The only motion is the peculiar motion, because you just

0:19:12.640 --> 0:19:14.679
<v Speaker 1>sort of set the expansion of the universe as like

0:19:14.760 --> 0:19:15.800
<v Speaker 1>the baseline thing.

0:19:16.119 --> 0:19:18.320
<v Speaker 2>Right, It's sort of like maybe like the river analogies

0:19:18.359 --> 0:19:21.119
<v Speaker 2>you just brought up earlier, like we're all moving in

0:19:21.200 --> 0:19:24.400
<v Speaker 2>a river, and the flow of the river is the

0:19:24.520 --> 0:19:27.159
<v Speaker 2>hubble flow, or like the expansion of the universe. But

0:19:27.240 --> 0:19:29.760
<v Speaker 2>you know, within my little raft, I can have something

0:19:29.800 --> 0:19:32.080
<v Speaker 2>moving relative to each other, or I can try like

0:19:32.240 --> 0:19:34.520
<v Speaker 2>rowing towards your raft, and then there would be some

0:19:34.560 --> 0:19:36.240
<v Speaker 2>peculiar motion between our rafts.

0:19:36.400 --> 0:19:38.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly right. Maybe we have engines and we're trying

0:19:38.720 --> 0:19:41.480
<v Speaker 1>to push towards each other against the current, or we're

0:19:41.480 --> 0:19:43.800
<v Speaker 1>trying to get away from each other or whatever, so

0:19:43.840 --> 0:19:45.119
<v Speaker 1>that's our peculiar motion.

0:19:45.240 --> 0:19:48.680
<v Speaker 2>All right, Well, these are peculiar concepts. And so let's

0:19:48.680 --> 0:19:52.760
<v Speaker 2>dig into Now, what is the dark flow of the universe?

0:19:52.960 --> 0:19:55.119
<v Speaker 2>Why is it dark? Where is it flowing? And is

0:19:55.160 --> 0:19:57.760
<v Speaker 2>it something we want to touch or take a bath in.

0:19:57.960 --> 0:19:59.720
<v Speaker 2>So let's dig into that. But first let's take a

0:19:59.760 --> 0:20:14.879
<v Speaker 2>qu break. All right, we're talking about the dark flow

0:20:14.960 --> 0:20:17.959
<v Speaker 2>of the universe, which sounds a little bit sinister. I

0:20:18.000 --> 0:20:22.280
<v Speaker 2>feel like there's something going on under the surface.

0:20:22.160 --> 0:20:24.879
<v Speaker 1>That is not light, sort of like a Batman tinged

0:20:25.080 --> 0:20:27.160
<v Speaker 1>story the Dark Knights of Gotham.

0:20:27.480 --> 0:20:31.960
<v Speaker 2>I can underplot you like, there's something going on in

0:20:32.000 --> 0:20:32.800
<v Speaker 2>the streets.

0:20:32.440 --> 0:20:33.920
<v Speaker 1>Of Gotham exactly.

0:20:34.720 --> 0:20:37.240
<v Speaker 2>There's a flow of villainy in the sewers.

0:20:37.520 --> 0:20:40.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, or maybe it's financial plumbing, right, it's a flow

0:20:40.200 --> 0:20:41.919
<v Speaker 1>of dark money through politics.

0:20:42.320 --> 0:20:44.840
<v Speaker 2>Oh there you go. Well again, maybe you should have

0:20:44.840 --> 0:20:48.640
<v Speaker 2>called it something different and not dark and confuse everybody.

0:20:48.800 --> 0:20:51.280
<v Speaker 1>You there means the entire physics community, right, because I

0:20:51.359 --> 0:20:52.960
<v Speaker 1>certainly didn't call this dark flow.

0:20:53.040 --> 0:20:55.960
<v Speaker 2>But you keep using it though, so you're complicit.

0:20:56.440 --> 0:21:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Yes, I am complicit. Admit to that. Toss me in

0:21:01.040 --> 0:21:03.080
<v Speaker 1>physical naming jail and throw away the key.

0:21:03.960 --> 0:21:05.920
<v Speaker 2>Yes, we'll lock you up an archem asylum with the

0:21:05.960 --> 0:21:09.240
<v Speaker 2>rest of the Batman villains. All right, we're talking about

0:21:09.240 --> 0:21:12.480
<v Speaker 2>the dark flow of the universe, and we talked about

0:21:12.480 --> 0:21:17.040
<v Speaker 2>how the universe is expanding, and it's because space is expanding.

0:21:17.080 --> 0:21:20.720
<v Speaker 2>All of space in the universe is expanding. And that flow,

0:21:20.760 --> 0:21:23.680
<v Speaker 2>that flow of new space flowing everywhere, being created everywhere,

0:21:24.000 --> 0:21:26.840
<v Speaker 2>stretching things out they're in space. We call that the

0:21:26.920 --> 0:21:29.920
<v Speaker 2>hubble flow. Now is that the same as the dark flow?

0:21:30.080 --> 0:21:32.840
<v Speaker 1>So that's the Hubble flow. The dark flow is a

0:21:32.920 --> 0:21:37.520
<v Speaker 1>question about this peculiar motion. Are there any patterns in

0:21:37.560 --> 0:21:40.919
<v Speaker 1>the peculiar motion? Like we expect that the universe is

0:21:40.960 --> 0:21:44.520
<v Speaker 1>the same everywhere and it's all just random, there's nothing special,

0:21:45.080 --> 0:21:47.479
<v Speaker 1>and so that if you look at the directions and

0:21:47.520 --> 0:21:51.280
<v Speaker 1>the magnitudes of these peculiar motions, like where's every galaxy going,

0:21:51.480 --> 0:21:53.680
<v Speaker 1>and you add them all up, they should basically add

0:21:53.760 --> 0:21:56.440
<v Speaker 1>up to zero, right, there should be no preferred direction

0:21:56.680 --> 0:21:57.960
<v Speaker 1>in the universe.

0:21:57.800 --> 0:22:02.560
<v Speaker 2>Meaning like like let's say we ignore the expansion of

0:22:02.600 --> 0:22:06.199
<v Speaker 2>the universe, or like take that into account, or you

0:22:06.240 --> 0:22:09.960
<v Speaker 2>substract the expansion of the universe from the motion of everything.

0:22:10.119 --> 0:22:12.639
<v Speaker 2>How is everything moving? How are all those superclusters of

0:22:12.680 --> 0:22:16.119
<v Speaker 2>galaxies on those galaxies and stars? How's it all moving?

0:22:16.480 --> 0:22:18.600
<v Speaker 2>If the universe wasn't expanding, that's what you mean?

0:22:18.840 --> 0:22:22.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, essentially relative to the expansion. How is everything moving?

0:22:22.359 --> 0:22:24.800
<v Speaker 1>Does it point in some particular direction? Does it average

0:22:24.800 --> 0:22:28.200
<v Speaker 1>out to zero? We expect, based on like very simple,

0:22:28.359 --> 0:22:31.679
<v Speaker 1>kind of naive but powerful arguments, that it should average

0:22:31.680 --> 0:22:34.879
<v Speaker 1>out to zero. We think the universe is the same everywhere,

0:22:35.200 --> 0:22:37.200
<v Speaker 1>and the Big Bang happened at every point in the

0:22:37.280 --> 0:22:40.000
<v Speaker 1>universe the same time, and there was no global over

0:22:40.080 --> 0:22:43.040
<v Speaker 1>density anywhere, and so we expect it to basically average

0:22:43.080 --> 0:22:43.560
<v Speaker 1>out to zero.

0:22:43.760 --> 0:22:45.560
<v Speaker 2>Now, what do you mean by average out to zero?

0:22:45.680 --> 0:22:48.440
<v Speaker 2>Like why should that be the case? Like the motion

0:22:48.560 --> 0:22:50.440
<v Speaker 2>of our solar system does it add up to zero?

0:22:50.720 --> 0:22:53.600
<v Speaker 1>So our solar system reflects the spin of the initial

0:22:53.640 --> 0:22:56.280
<v Speaker 1>blob of gas that formed it. Right, that blob of

0:22:56.320 --> 0:22:59.000
<v Speaker 1>gas had a bunch of particles heading and render directions,

0:22:59.000 --> 0:23:01.400
<v Speaker 1>and it was a regularly shape. Then it was spinning,

0:23:01.480 --> 0:23:03.760
<v Speaker 1>and so the spinning, the motion of our solar system,

0:23:03.880 --> 0:23:05.920
<v Speaker 1>including the motion of the Solar system around the center

0:23:05.920 --> 0:23:09.600
<v Speaker 1>of the galaxy, does reflect the motion of that initial blob.

0:23:10.160 --> 0:23:13.520
<v Speaker 1>And we expect all those blobs were basically created equal,

0:23:13.600 --> 0:23:15.440
<v Speaker 1>and so you'll get some spinning one way and some

0:23:15.440 --> 0:23:17.600
<v Speaker 1>spinning another way, and some moving this way and some

0:23:17.680 --> 0:23:20.320
<v Speaker 1>moving that way, and you do see a big variation

0:23:20.440 --> 0:23:22.840
<v Speaker 1>of like directions of stars, et cetera.

0:23:23.520 --> 0:23:24.960
<v Speaker 2>I see, it's sort of like maybe if you had

0:23:25.000 --> 0:23:27.880
<v Speaker 2>like a gas canister full of gas molecules, you sort

0:23:27.880 --> 0:23:30.639
<v Speaker 2>of expect all the gas molecules, all the motions of

0:23:30.960 --> 0:23:34.240
<v Speaker 2>all those particles and molecules to average out to zero, right,

0:23:34.280 --> 0:23:37.840
<v Speaker 2>because it's all sort of random. The canister's not going anywhere,

0:23:38.080 --> 0:23:40.760
<v Speaker 2>and it's had some time to like diffuse and even.

0:23:40.600 --> 0:23:44.040
<v Speaker 1>Out exactly unless there was something outside that cannister pulling

0:23:44.080 --> 0:23:46.399
<v Speaker 1>on them, or something pushing on the whole canister, or

0:23:46.440 --> 0:23:49.120
<v Speaker 1>something else acting that you weren't aware of, the motion

0:23:49.200 --> 0:23:51.479
<v Speaker 1>of all the molecules should add up to zero. So

0:23:51.520 --> 0:23:52.200
<v Speaker 1>that's the question.

0:23:52.480 --> 0:23:54.159
<v Speaker 2>And so that's kind of what you were saying we

0:23:54.160 --> 0:23:56.639
<v Speaker 2>should expect from the universe. Like if you subtract the

0:23:56.760 --> 0:23:59.679
<v Speaker 2>expansion of the unverse from the motion of everything, then

0:24:00.080 --> 0:24:02.520
<v Speaker 2>basically all the stars and galaxies out there shots sort

0:24:02.520 --> 0:24:05.359
<v Speaker 2>of look like a canister of gas where everything's just

0:24:05.400 --> 0:24:07.760
<v Speaker 2>moving in random directions, but it should all add up to.

0:24:07.800 --> 0:24:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Zero, exactly. And there's one more little bit of trickiness

0:24:11.520 --> 0:24:13.439
<v Speaker 1>that we need to think about before we're ready to

0:24:13.560 --> 0:24:17.159
<v Speaker 1>actually look at those galaxies and answer the question. And

0:24:17.200 --> 0:24:20.360
<v Speaker 1>that's the frame of reference when we talked about subtracting

0:24:20.400 --> 0:24:23.080
<v Speaker 1>out the expansion of the universe, and that's helpful for

0:24:23.160 --> 0:24:26.480
<v Speaker 1>like removing something we already understand that's causing everything to

0:24:26.520 --> 0:24:28.520
<v Speaker 1>get away from each other. But we still need to

0:24:28.560 --> 0:24:30.960
<v Speaker 1>pick a frame of reference in order to calculate the

0:24:31.040 --> 0:24:34.480
<v Speaker 1>velocity of a galaxy, because galaxies don't have velocity relative

0:24:34.520 --> 0:24:37.480
<v Speaker 1>to space, they only have velocity in some reference frame.

0:24:37.600 --> 0:24:40.040
<v Speaker 1>Like put a reference frame on one galaxy, measure the

0:24:40.080 --> 0:24:43.440
<v Speaker 1>velocity of another one relative to that or your spaceship

0:24:43.560 --> 0:24:46.960
<v Speaker 1>or something. Right, velocities are not a property of objects.

0:24:47.000 --> 0:24:50.159
<v Speaker 1>There are properties of pairs of objects. So basically have

0:24:50.280 --> 0:24:52.359
<v Speaker 1>to pick a reference frame in which you're going to

0:24:52.400 --> 0:24:54.440
<v Speaker 1>measure the velocity of all these objects.

0:24:54.680 --> 0:24:56.600
<v Speaker 2>And is it going to change if you changed the

0:24:56.960 --> 0:24:58.960
<v Speaker 2>point of reference, like it shouldn't it add up to

0:24:59.080 --> 0:24:59.840
<v Speaker 2>zero no matter what?

0:25:00.240 --> 0:25:02.359
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, this is a really interesting and subtle point, like

0:25:02.440 --> 0:25:05.840
<v Speaker 1>space itself has no frame of reference, doesn't prefer any

0:25:05.880 --> 0:25:07.960
<v Speaker 1>frame of reference, and so it's often said like the

0:25:08.080 --> 0:25:11.199
<v Speaker 1>universe has no preferred frame, and that's mostly true, But

0:25:11.320 --> 0:25:14.359
<v Speaker 1>the stuff in the universe definitely does have a frame

0:25:14.400 --> 0:25:17.240
<v Speaker 1>of reference. Like if you add up the velocities of

0:25:17.280 --> 0:25:19.960
<v Speaker 1>all the stuff in the universe, that has a frame

0:25:20.000 --> 0:25:22.359
<v Speaker 1>of reference, right, that has a location that has an

0:25:22.400 --> 0:25:25.800
<v Speaker 1>average velocity, and so the stuff in the universe has

0:25:25.800 --> 0:25:27.600
<v Speaker 1>a frame and you can sort of pick that frame

0:25:27.640 --> 0:25:31.320
<v Speaker 1>of reference just by looking at the cosmic microwave background radiation.

0:25:31.520 --> 0:25:33.800
<v Speaker 2>But wait, I thought every other motion of the other

0:25:33.840 --> 0:25:35.960
<v Speaker 2>stuff out there should add up to zero. Are you

0:25:36.000 --> 0:25:38.439
<v Speaker 2>saying it doesn't or it may not. Like if you

0:25:38.560 --> 0:25:40.639
<v Speaker 2>calculate the average velocity of all the galaxies in the

0:25:40.720 --> 0:25:43.920
<v Speaker 2>universe observable universe, shouldn't that be zero?

0:25:44.160 --> 0:25:46.600
<v Speaker 1>It should be if you pick the right reference frame, right,

0:25:46.640 --> 0:25:49.560
<v Speaker 1>and you understand everything that's happening. So that's why the

0:25:49.560 --> 0:25:52.400
<v Speaker 1>answer depends a little bit on the reference frame. So

0:25:52.440 --> 0:25:54.640
<v Speaker 1>we go back to the very early universe and say, well,

0:25:54.680 --> 0:25:56.840
<v Speaker 1>what was the reference frame of all the stuff in

0:25:56.880 --> 0:25:59.399
<v Speaker 1>the early universe, like when things were still hot and

0:25:59.480 --> 0:26:02.720
<v Speaker 1>dense and a big plasma. We can actually measure that

0:26:02.760 --> 0:26:05.439
<v Speaker 1>because we can look at the cosmic microwave background radiation

0:26:05.720 --> 0:26:07.920
<v Speaker 1>the life from that plasma, and we can look at

0:26:07.920 --> 0:26:10.639
<v Speaker 1>like whether it's bluer or redder in one direction. So

0:26:10.680 --> 0:26:14.280
<v Speaker 1>we can measure our motion through this cosmic microwave background

0:26:14.359 --> 0:26:16.439
<v Speaker 1>radiation and that tells us what the frame of the

0:26:16.520 --> 0:26:19.080
<v Speaker 1>universe was like fourteen billion years ago, and so it

0:26:19.119 --> 0:26:20.840
<v Speaker 1>gives us a frame. Then we can ask, like, are

0:26:20.880 --> 0:26:25.880
<v Speaker 1>the galaxies now moving relative to the cosmic microwave background radiation?

0:26:26.440 --> 0:26:28.280
<v Speaker 1>We expect that to be no, because we think the

0:26:28.280 --> 0:26:31.440
<v Speaker 1>galaxies came from the same stuff that formed the CMB,

0:26:32.040 --> 0:26:35.119
<v Speaker 1>so it'd be weird if that stuff was moving relative

0:26:35.200 --> 0:26:36.080
<v Speaker 1>to the CMB.

0:26:36.359 --> 0:26:38.880
<v Speaker 2>Wait wait, wait, wait, are you saying the cosmic microwave

0:26:38.920 --> 0:26:42.159
<v Speaker 2>background radiation is not the same in all directions? You're saying, like,

0:26:42.160 --> 0:26:44.240
<v Speaker 2>it's redder to the right than to our left.

0:26:44.400 --> 0:26:46.800
<v Speaker 1>Kind of yeah, because we're moving through the CMB, we

0:26:46.880 --> 0:26:50.600
<v Speaker 1>have a non zero velocity relative to the CMB. If

0:26:50.600 --> 0:26:53.440
<v Speaker 1>you just measure the CMB overall is very obviously redder

0:26:53.520 --> 0:26:56.000
<v Speaker 1>in one direction and bluer in the other. And then

0:26:56.040 --> 0:26:58.240
<v Speaker 1>typically you see these maps of the CNB, but they've

0:26:58.280 --> 0:27:01.440
<v Speaker 1>already subtracted that out. They've already measured our overall motion

0:27:01.600 --> 0:27:04.239
<v Speaker 1>relative to the CMB and subtracted that out, and then

0:27:04.240 --> 0:27:07.320
<v Speaker 1>they're looking for like tiny little wiggles in the CMB

0:27:07.760 --> 0:27:08.480
<v Speaker 1>on top of that.

0:27:09.240 --> 0:27:11.159
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I see what it's saying. So like, if you

0:27:11.160 --> 0:27:14.640
<v Speaker 2>look at the cosmic microwrate background, it has a certain

0:27:14.720 --> 0:27:18.600
<v Speaker 2>velocity or motion to it, and so you have to

0:27:18.680 --> 0:27:21.399
<v Speaker 2>sort of assume that's like the motion of the universe

0:27:21.480 --> 0:27:24.560
<v Speaker 2>kind of, that's like the home base of the universe.

0:27:24.680 --> 0:27:27.640
<v Speaker 1>Yes, the zero of the universe. That's really the only

0:27:27.680 --> 0:27:30.160
<v Speaker 1>thing we can compare two. Right, You can't just measure

0:27:30.240 --> 0:27:33.280
<v Speaker 1>velocities relative to space. That doesn't have any meaning. You

0:27:33.320 --> 0:27:35.760
<v Speaker 1>have to measure relative to something. So you need like

0:27:35.760 --> 0:27:38.600
<v Speaker 1>a baseline. So we go back to the early universe

0:27:38.720 --> 0:27:41.399
<v Speaker 1>and take the frame of the CMB and say, our

0:27:41.520 --> 0:27:45.920
<v Speaker 1>galaxies overall moving in some direction relative to the motion

0:27:46.040 --> 0:27:48.400
<v Speaker 1>of the CNB. That would be weird. It's not weird

0:27:48.440 --> 0:27:50.960
<v Speaker 1>for one galaxy to be moving relative to the CNB

0:27:51.320 --> 0:27:53.640
<v Speaker 1>or like stuff happens, it gets pulled in some direction.

0:27:53.920 --> 0:27:56.400
<v Speaker 1>The Earth is moving relative to the CNB. No big deal.

0:27:56.680 --> 0:27:59.080
<v Speaker 1>But if you add up everything relative to the CMB

0:27:59.320 --> 0:28:03.320
<v Speaker 1>after subtract the expansion also, then the question is where

0:28:03.359 --> 0:28:04.200
<v Speaker 1>is everything going?

0:28:04.680 --> 0:28:06.840
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I see, so we've measured the velocities of all

0:28:06.880 --> 0:28:09.600
<v Speaker 2>the galaxies and superclusters and stars out there in space,

0:28:09.720 --> 0:28:11.760
<v Speaker 2>and we've measured how they move relative to the cosmic

0:28:11.800 --> 0:28:14.720
<v Speaker 2>microrerate background radiation. And you're saying it should be zero

0:28:14.880 --> 0:28:17.280
<v Speaker 2>if you think about it, because it should average out,

0:28:17.400 --> 0:28:18.280
<v Speaker 2>but is it.

0:28:18.280 --> 0:28:21.159
<v Speaker 1>It does not average out to zero. And that's the

0:28:21.280 --> 0:28:26.120
<v Speaker 1>dark flow. The dark flow is this extra unexplained velocity

0:28:26.160 --> 0:28:29.679
<v Speaker 1>of all of these galaxies relative to the CMB. After

0:28:29.800 --> 0:28:33.680
<v Speaker 1>subtracting out the expansion, turns out the galaxies are pointing

0:28:33.760 --> 0:28:34.719
<v Speaker 1>in a certain direction.

0:28:35.000 --> 0:28:36.520
<v Speaker 2>Wait, what where are they going?

0:28:38.360 --> 0:28:40.680
<v Speaker 1>So they did this really cool study where they measured

0:28:40.720 --> 0:28:43.160
<v Speaker 1>the velocities of a bunch of different galaxies.

0:28:43.480 --> 0:28:45.880
<v Speaker 2>And this is you've measured like everything like the whole

0:28:45.920 --> 0:28:47.480
<v Speaker 2>observable universe that we can see.

0:28:47.920 --> 0:28:50.600
<v Speaker 1>No, definitely not. That would take way too long. What

0:28:50.640 --> 0:28:53.640
<v Speaker 1>they did is they found like seven hundred clusters out

0:28:53.680 --> 0:28:56.560
<v Speaker 1>there in the universe and they measure the velocities of those.

0:28:56.920 --> 0:29:00.720
<v Speaker 1>So again, not even individual galaxies like galaxy cluster. They

0:29:00.720 --> 0:29:03.120
<v Speaker 1>wanted to like scan as far as they could across

0:29:03.160 --> 0:29:06.440
<v Speaker 1>the observable universe. But you know there's zillions and zillions

0:29:06.480 --> 0:29:08.600
<v Speaker 1>of galaxies. If you did the whole project, it would

0:29:08.600 --> 0:29:09.120
<v Speaker 1>take forever.

0:29:09.400 --> 0:29:12.320
<v Speaker 2>So then isn't that a really tiny sample of the

0:29:12.360 --> 0:29:13.120
<v Speaker 2>whole universe.

0:29:13.600 --> 0:29:16.840
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, it's a tiny sample, but they measured it across

0:29:16.880 --> 0:29:20.320
<v Speaker 1>the universe, so they hope there's no bias. And they

0:29:20.480 --> 0:29:22.760
<v Speaker 1>know how much data they have, so they can measure

0:29:22.760 --> 0:29:25.960
<v Speaker 1>the statistical uncertainty there. So if they measure a velocity

0:29:25.960 --> 0:29:28.280
<v Speaker 1>that's smaller than their uncertainty, then they say, okay, it's

0:29:28.320 --> 0:29:31.560
<v Speaker 1>consistent with zero. If they measure something much bigger than

0:29:31.560 --> 0:29:34.760
<v Speaker 1>their uncertainty, they can still tell that it's happening. Like

0:29:34.800 --> 0:29:37.040
<v Speaker 1>if you only measure the speed of two cars zooming

0:29:37.040 --> 0:29:39.480
<v Speaker 1>biber they're going one hundred miles an hour, then that's

0:29:39.560 --> 0:29:42.520
<v Speaker 1>very likely the average speed of your road is not zero,

0:29:42.640 --> 0:29:44.040
<v Speaker 1>it's closer to one hundred.

0:29:44.880 --> 0:29:48.280
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so that's a big mystery. Like you've measured the

0:29:48.320 --> 0:29:50.800
<v Speaker 2>velocity of while the superclusters out there, or at least

0:29:50.800 --> 0:29:53.440
<v Speaker 2>a sample of them, and they don't seem to be

0:29:53.520 --> 0:29:57.000
<v Speaker 2>standing still relative to the background of the universe.

0:29:57.760 --> 0:30:00.160
<v Speaker 1>And they use this very cool technique to measure the

0:30:00.200 --> 0:30:03.200
<v Speaker 1>velocities of these galaxies because these clusters can be hard

0:30:03.240 --> 0:30:05.440
<v Speaker 1>to see. And so what they did is they looked

0:30:05.480 --> 0:30:09.240
<v Speaker 1>at CMB photons passing through these clouds of hot gas.

0:30:09.360 --> 0:30:11.880
<v Speaker 1>As the CMB photons passed through them, they get a

0:30:11.920 --> 0:30:15.000
<v Speaker 1>little bit of boost of energy from interacting with these clouds.

0:30:15.240 --> 0:30:18.000
<v Speaker 1>You can use this to see distant galaxies just by

0:30:18.040 --> 0:30:21.200
<v Speaker 1>like their effect on the CMB, Like if those photons

0:30:21.240 --> 0:30:24.000
<v Speaker 1>have passed through the blob of gas, then you can

0:30:24.040 --> 0:30:26.480
<v Speaker 1>tell and you can tell the velocity of that blob

0:30:26.520 --> 0:30:29.200
<v Speaker 1>of gas. It's like an extra little Doppler shift there.

0:30:29.440 --> 0:30:32.440
<v Speaker 2>M Okay, So everything seems to be moving relative to

0:30:32.440 --> 0:30:34.680
<v Speaker 2>the background of the universe by a lot or is

0:30:34.720 --> 0:30:36.200
<v Speaker 2>it like a little tiny drift.

0:30:36.320 --> 0:30:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Well, it depends on your scale of reference. But like

0:30:38.360 --> 0:30:42.200
<v Speaker 1>it's moving an eight hundred to one thousand kilometers per second.

0:30:42.600 --> 0:30:45.400
<v Speaker 1>You add it all up, it's really a non zero number.

0:30:45.520 --> 0:30:48.360
<v Speaker 1>It's pointing sort of in the direction of the Centaurus

0:30:48.360 --> 0:30:52.520
<v Speaker 1>and Hydra constellations, which listeners might remember is sort of

0:30:52.560 --> 0:30:55.520
<v Speaker 1>in the same direction as what we call the great attractor,

0:30:56.040 --> 0:30:59.040
<v Speaker 1>which is behind the zone of avoidance in our galaxy.

0:30:59.120 --> 0:31:01.280
<v Speaker 1>Like our galaxy is a big disc, right, and so

0:31:01.320 --> 0:31:03.520
<v Speaker 1>you can look up above the disc, or down below

0:31:03.560 --> 0:31:05.960
<v Speaker 1>the disc, or sort of out away from the center

0:31:06.000 --> 0:31:08.400
<v Speaker 1>of the galaxy. Those directions are pretty easy to see

0:31:08.400 --> 0:31:10.720
<v Speaker 1>because you're not looking through a lot of dense galaxy.

0:31:10.760 --> 0:31:12.600
<v Speaker 1>But if you try to look through the center of

0:31:12.640 --> 0:31:15.200
<v Speaker 1>the disc itself, or even through the center of the galaxy,

0:31:15.320 --> 0:31:17.240
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of stuff there, a lot of gas

0:31:17.280 --> 0:31:19.680
<v Speaker 1>and dust and other stars and black holes that block

0:31:19.720 --> 0:31:22.840
<v Speaker 1>our view. And in that direction there also tends to

0:31:22.880 --> 0:31:26.200
<v Speaker 1>be like a lot of gravitational motion within the observable universe.

0:31:26.600 --> 0:31:28.640
<v Speaker 1>So it's called the Great Attractor. We don't know what's

0:31:28.680 --> 0:31:31.480
<v Speaker 1>there exactly, because we can't see in that direction very well,

0:31:31.720 --> 0:31:34.320
<v Speaker 1>but they're already We thought there was a lot of

0:31:34.400 --> 0:31:37.560
<v Speaker 1>local gravitational motion in that direction towards sort of the

0:31:37.560 --> 0:31:40.960
<v Speaker 1>center of the Linikia supercluster, and now it looks like

0:31:41.040 --> 0:31:44.560
<v Speaker 1>the whole universe is also moving in that direction. Like

0:31:44.600 --> 0:31:47.520
<v Speaker 1>you add up all the galaxies in the universe, their

0:31:47.640 --> 0:31:51.320
<v Speaker 1>velocity on average points in the same direction as our

0:31:51.400 --> 0:31:53.000
<v Speaker 1>motion towards the Great Attractor.

0:31:53.120 --> 0:31:55.120
<v Speaker 2>And by all the galaxies in the universe, you mean

0:31:55.160 --> 0:31:56.760
<v Speaker 2>all the galaxies we can see.

0:31:56.680 --> 0:31:59.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean only these seven hundred clusters that were measured

0:31:59.240 --> 0:32:00.320
<v Speaker 1>by this one study.

0:32:01.040 --> 0:32:03.520
<v Speaker 2>Right right, Well, a zero sample of all of them.

0:32:03.840 --> 0:32:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly, a tiny, tiny sample, but yes, statistically significant

0:32:08.240 --> 0:32:10.560
<v Speaker 1>sample of all of them, and they measured a big velocity.

0:32:10.560 --> 0:32:12.280
<v Speaker 1>This is a really surprising result.

0:32:12.560 --> 0:32:15.280
<v Speaker 2>So they've measured how things are moving, and you're saying

0:32:15.280 --> 0:32:18.120
<v Speaker 2>they're moving in a particular direction, which seems to be

0:32:18.160 --> 0:32:22.080
<v Speaker 2>in the direction of something really really extra big compared

0:32:22.160 --> 0:32:24.120
<v Speaker 2>to the size of the observable universe.

0:32:24.280 --> 0:32:25.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And I don't want to confuse people, because there's

0:32:25.960 --> 0:32:28.600
<v Speaker 1>two different motions we're talking about here. Like one is

0:32:28.680 --> 0:32:32.080
<v Speaker 1>our particular peculiar motion, the motion of Andromeda and the

0:32:32.080 --> 0:32:35.160
<v Speaker 1>milky way in our little cluster is being pulled towards

0:32:35.160 --> 0:32:38.120
<v Speaker 1>the center of the Lina Kia Clue supercluster by some

0:32:38.280 --> 0:32:42.200
<v Speaker 1>big mass that's within our universe. Right, that's our sort

0:32:42.200 --> 0:32:44.720
<v Speaker 1>of local peculiar motion. But then you add up all

0:32:44.720 --> 0:32:47.360
<v Speaker 1>the peculiar motion of the whole universe, and that also

0:32:47.480 --> 0:32:50.560
<v Speaker 1>seems to be headed coincidentally, maybe I don't know, in

0:32:50.640 --> 0:32:54.240
<v Speaker 1>the same direction. So like, the whole universe is also

0:32:54.320 --> 0:32:56.880
<v Speaker 1>moving and its arrow is in the same direction as

0:32:56.960 --> 0:33:00.480
<v Speaker 1>our local motion towards the great attractor. So sort of

0:33:00.560 --> 0:33:02.520
<v Speaker 1>like back to the analogy of boats in the river,

0:33:02.720 --> 0:33:05.240
<v Speaker 1>we discover that, oh, our boat is moving in some

0:33:05.360 --> 0:33:07.680
<v Speaker 1>direction relative to the river, and then we add of

0:33:07.760 --> 0:33:10.040
<v Speaker 1>all the boats and like, oh my gosh, everybody's moving

0:33:10.040 --> 0:33:12.760
<v Speaker 1>in that direction. What's going on? It's this as something

0:33:12.840 --> 0:33:14.920
<v Speaker 1>much bigger than just the Great Attractor.

0:33:15.040 --> 0:33:18.040
<v Speaker 2>The Great Attractor is within our supercluster of galaxies, or

0:33:18.080 --> 0:33:19.040
<v Speaker 2>it's outside of it.

0:33:19.080 --> 0:33:20.920
<v Speaker 1>We don't know what the Great Attractor is. We think

0:33:20.920 --> 0:33:23.120
<v Speaker 1>it might be something super massive at the core of

0:33:23.160 --> 0:33:27.720
<v Speaker 1>our supercluster. So yeah, probably it's within our supercluster. But

0:33:27.840 --> 0:33:30.800
<v Speaker 1>the dark flow is the motion of everything in the universe,

0:33:31.080 --> 0:33:33.880
<v Speaker 1>coincidentally or not, I don't know, in the same direction

0:33:34.280 --> 0:33:36.560
<v Speaker 1>as our motion towards our supercluster.

0:33:37.120 --> 0:33:39.760
<v Speaker 2>Well, like, we're next to this great attractor and we're

0:33:39.760 --> 0:33:42.320
<v Speaker 2>moving towards it. Are you saying then that when you

0:33:42.360 --> 0:33:44.880
<v Speaker 2>measure out the whole universe, even the stuff behind the

0:33:44.880 --> 0:33:49.040
<v Speaker 2>Great Attractor is moving towards the Great Attractor, meaning towards us.

0:33:49.240 --> 0:33:51.240
<v Speaker 1>No, the stuff behind the Great Attractor is moving in

0:33:51.280 --> 0:33:54.880
<v Speaker 1>the same direction as us, meaning away from the Great Attractor.

0:33:55.400 --> 0:33:58.280
<v Speaker 1>So the overall motion is in the same direction, not

0:33:58.320 --> 0:34:00.400
<v Speaker 1>towards the Great Attractor, but in the same direct is

0:34:00.440 --> 0:34:02.240
<v Speaker 1>our motion towards as a great attractor.

0:34:02.440 --> 0:34:05.600
<v Speaker 2>Oh so the Great Attractor is just maybe a red herring,

0:34:05.880 --> 0:34:07.800
<v Speaker 2>it's not really doing anything.

0:34:08.040 --> 0:34:09.920
<v Speaker 1>Maybe, I don't know. It's sort of weird that it

0:34:09.920 --> 0:34:12.160
<v Speaker 1>would be a coincidence, but it might just be Yes.

0:34:12.680 --> 0:34:15.279
<v Speaker 2>All right, well, let's dig into what that could mean,

0:34:15.320 --> 0:34:18.000
<v Speaker 2>what could be causing the dark flow of the universe,

0:34:18.040 --> 0:34:19.680
<v Speaker 2>and whether or not we do have to call the

0:34:19.680 --> 0:34:22.799
<v Speaker 2>plumbers to fix it or not. So let's dig into that.

0:34:22.960 --> 0:34:38.080
<v Speaker 2>But first let's take another quick break. All right, we're

0:34:38.080 --> 0:34:40.279
<v Speaker 2>talking about the dark flow of the universe, which is

0:34:40.440 --> 0:34:42.960
<v Speaker 2>this idea that it seems like everything in the universe

0:34:43.080 --> 0:34:46.400
<v Speaker 2>is moving in a particular direction and we don't know why.

0:34:46.520 --> 0:34:49.320
<v Speaker 1>We definitely don't know why, which is why we slapped

0:34:49.360 --> 0:34:51.799
<v Speaker 1>our familiar dark label on this thing.

0:34:52.200 --> 0:34:55.360
<v Speaker 2>Or I guess it's moving relative to the cosmic microwave background.

0:34:55.440 --> 0:34:57.359
<v Speaker 2>Could it be a the microwave background is the one

0:34:57.360 --> 0:34:58.880
<v Speaker 2>that's moving or has a bias.

0:34:59.280 --> 0:35:01.799
<v Speaker 1>Well, the motion is relative, so I'm not sure what

0:35:01.880 --> 0:35:03.799
<v Speaker 1>it means to say the CNB is the one that's

0:35:03.840 --> 0:35:07.360
<v Speaker 1>moving like relative to what relative to all the galaxies? Yes,

0:35:07.480 --> 0:35:09.279
<v Speaker 1>but the motion is relative, so you can't just like

0:35:09.320 --> 0:35:12.000
<v Speaker 1>ascribe it to one and not the other. But it's

0:35:12.040 --> 0:35:15.399
<v Speaker 1>the relative motion that's curious, right, because we think that

0:35:15.440 --> 0:35:18.080
<v Speaker 1>the stuff that made the galaxies, it's the same stuff

0:35:18.200 --> 0:35:21.040
<v Speaker 1>that made that CMB light. So that plasma that made

0:35:21.040 --> 0:35:24.040
<v Speaker 1>the CMB light, its overall motion should be the same

0:35:24.320 --> 0:35:27.200
<v Speaker 1>as the galaxies, because the plasma is what turned into

0:35:27.239 --> 0:35:31.200
<v Speaker 1>the galaxies, unless there was something else involved, unless there's

0:35:31.239 --> 0:35:35.040
<v Speaker 1>something else pulling on these galaxies that didn't pull on

0:35:35.080 --> 0:35:35.600
<v Speaker 1>the CMB.

0:35:36.080 --> 0:35:38.520
<v Speaker 2>I mean, like, if you zoom out of where we

0:35:38.600 --> 0:35:42.520
<v Speaker 2>are our supercluster, our galaxies are superclusters, maybe we're orbiting

0:35:42.560 --> 0:35:46.719
<v Speaker 2>around something bigger then, maybe even the bigger than the

0:35:46.719 --> 0:35:48.320
<v Speaker 2>observable universe exactly.

0:35:48.360 --> 0:35:50.799
<v Speaker 1>And we often talk about the observable universe as our

0:35:50.880 --> 0:35:53.799
<v Speaker 1>limit of the things that we can see, But there's

0:35:53.800 --> 0:35:56.960
<v Speaker 1>an important subtlety there. The observable universe is what we

0:35:56.960 --> 0:35:59.840
<v Speaker 1>can see now, what we can interact with now. The

0:36:00.080 --> 0:36:03.080
<v Speaker 1>universe is expanding, right, and things used to be closer

0:36:03.120 --> 0:36:05.480
<v Speaker 1>to us. So there are things that used to be

0:36:05.560 --> 0:36:07.880
<v Speaker 1>in our observable universe that we used to be able

0:36:07.880 --> 0:36:09.680
<v Speaker 1>to interact with us, that used to be able to

0:36:09.760 --> 0:36:12.960
<v Speaker 1>affect us, which no longer can. So it might be

0:36:13.040 --> 0:36:16.279
<v Speaker 1>that by looking deep into our past and understanding how

0:36:16.320 --> 0:36:19.279
<v Speaker 1>the universe has been affected, we can see hints of

0:36:19.360 --> 0:36:22.840
<v Speaker 1>things that affected us which have now left our observable universe.

0:36:22.960 --> 0:36:25.600
<v Speaker 1>It's sort of like a way to sneak into seeing

0:36:25.680 --> 0:36:28.800
<v Speaker 1>things that are now outside the observable universe.

0:36:29.120 --> 0:36:33.879
<v Speaker 2>Wait, what because of this motion, like, maybe it tells

0:36:33.960 --> 0:36:35.160
<v Speaker 2>us where it's been.

0:36:35.480 --> 0:36:39.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly. What if there was something really massive, something

0:36:39.400 --> 0:36:43.800
<v Speaker 1>crazy massive, in our universe early on, and it created

0:36:43.840 --> 0:36:47.160
<v Speaker 1>this gravitational tug towards it, and now it's left our

0:36:47.200 --> 0:36:50.399
<v Speaker 1>observable universe, so it's not in our universe anymore. If

0:36:50.440 --> 0:36:52.800
<v Speaker 1>you then looked at the motion of just the stuff

0:36:52.800 --> 0:36:56.000
<v Speaker 1>in our observable universe, you would see it all moving

0:36:56.040 --> 0:37:00.440
<v Speaker 1>towards this mysterious source of gravity and attraction, even though

0:37:00.480 --> 0:37:03.080
<v Speaker 1>you wouldn't see that thing itself because it's now left

0:37:03.160 --> 0:37:06.960
<v Speaker 1>our observable universe. So something that's now outside of our

0:37:07.040 --> 0:37:10.799
<v Speaker 1>observable universe was once inside of it, right then it

0:37:10.920 --> 0:37:14.319
<v Speaker 1>might have still left an imprint on the motion of galaxies.

0:37:14.640 --> 0:37:17.160
<v Speaker 2>Meaning like maybe we could deduce where the Sun is

0:37:17.200 --> 0:37:19.040
<v Speaker 2>and what the sun is just by looking at the

0:37:19.160 --> 0:37:21.520
<v Speaker 2>orbit of the Earth without having to actually look at

0:37:21.560 --> 0:37:21.759
<v Speaker 2>the Sun.

0:37:21.840 --> 0:37:23.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly. You don't need to see the Sun in

0:37:23.600 --> 0:37:26.759
<v Speaker 1>order to know that the Sun is there, and so

0:37:26.960 --> 0:37:29.919
<v Speaker 1>even though this thing is outside our observable universe, it's

0:37:29.960 --> 0:37:33.279
<v Speaker 1>within our past light cone. Our past light cone is

0:37:33.320 --> 0:37:35.560
<v Speaker 1>all the stuff that we have interacted with in the

0:37:35.600 --> 0:37:38.719
<v Speaker 1>past that could have affected us in the past. And

0:37:38.760 --> 0:37:41.239
<v Speaker 1>the expansion of the universe is pulling things outside of

0:37:41.239 --> 0:37:43.799
<v Speaker 1>our light cone, making it impossible to interact with that

0:37:43.840 --> 0:37:46.600
<v Speaker 1>stuff because space is expanding faster than the speed of light.

0:37:46.719 --> 0:37:50.280
<v Speaker 1>But it is possible that there was once something very dense,

0:37:50.400 --> 0:37:54.800
<v Speaker 1>some intense mass, some source of incredible gravity that affected

0:37:54.800 --> 0:37:58.360
<v Speaker 1>the formation of the whole universe that we now can't see.

0:37:59.320 --> 0:38:01.759
<v Speaker 2>I see it like you know, how we found out

0:38:01.800 --> 0:38:04.719
<v Speaker 2>that the Earth is just orbiting around the Sun, and

0:38:04.760 --> 0:38:07.640
<v Speaker 2>then eventually we just find out that the Solar system,

0:38:07.680 --> 0:38:10.080
<v Speaker 2>the Sun is just kind of in a corner of

0:38:10.080 --> 0:38:12.360
<v Speaker 2>the Milky Way galaxy, orbiting around the center of the

0:38:12.360 --> 0:38:15.440
<v Speaker 2>Milky Way galaxy, not even close to the center of it.

0:38:15.480 --> 0:38:18.960
<v Speaker 2>And now maybe we're finding out that our whole observable universe,

0:38:19.080 --> 0:38:22.120
<v Speaker 2>everything that we can see, all those bazillions of stars,

0:38:22.120 --> 0:38:24.279
<v Speaker 2>maybe we're just like at the corner or at the

0:38:24.400 --> 0:38:29.560
<v Speaker 2>edge of some sort of a bigger massive of stuff

0:38:29.600 --> 0:38:30.200
<v Speaker 2>in the universe.

0:38:30.360 --> 0:38:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Exactly. And we like to imagine that the whole universe,

0:38:32.960 --> 0:38:35.360
<v Speaker 1>if it's infinite, is filled with the same kind of stuff,

0:38:35.719 --> 0:38:38.200
<v Speaker 1>and that our chunk and the observable universe we happen

0:38:38.200 --> 0:38:40.439
<v Speaker 1>to live in is probably an average chunk, and any

0:38:40.520 --> 0:38:42.640
<v Speaker 1>chunk you would all average out to zero. But it

0:38:42.719 --> 0:38:44.440
<v Speaker 1>might not be the case, right. It might be that

0:38:44.480 --> 0:38:47.279
<v Speaker 1>there is some larger structure. There are like things that

0:38:47.320 --> 0:38:49.520
<v Speaker 1>are denser and heavier and chance so that if you

0:38:49.600 --> 0:38:52.880
<v Speaker 1>take a random slice of the universe, you don't on

0:38:52.960 --> 0:38:55.600
<v Speaker 1>average get zero. It gives you a picture as to like,

0:38:55.640 --> 0:38:58.880
<v Speaker 1>what is that nearby larger structure. I think it's super

0:38:58.920 --> 0:39:02.040
<v Speaker 1>cool that we could like make measturements in our observable universe.

0:39:02.360 --> 0:39:06.080
<v Speaker 1>It get glimpses for what's beyond, right, which sometimes felt

0:39:06.080 --> 0:39:09.200
<v Speaker 1>like an impenetrable wall, like a dark wall beyond which

0:39:09.239 --> 0:39:11.879
<v Speaker 1>we couldn't see. But we can dig out clues from

0:39:11.920 --> 0:39:14.359
<v Speaker 1>the history of the universe to figure out what has

0:39:14.400 --> 0:39:16.400
<v Speaker 1>happened that we can no longer see.

0:39:16.520 --> 0:39:18.640
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's a little bit sort of like the picture

0:39:18.640 --> 0:39:20.560
<v Speaker 2>we have of the Milky Way galaxy where we live,

0:39:20.680 --> 0:39:22.480
<v Speaker 2>like we really can't see it. We're in the middle

0:39:22.520 --> 0:39:24.319
<v Speaker 2>of it. But we can sort of reconstruct what it

0:39:24.400 --> 0:39:26.759
<v Speaker 2>might be or what it is, just by looking at

0:39:26.760 --> 0:39:28.160
<v Speaker 2>the immediate things around us.

0:39:28.280 --> 0:39:30.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's true. The things that are obscuring our vision

0:39:30.719 --> 0:39:32.880
<v Speaker 1>are different. In the case of the Milky Way galaxy,

0:39:32.880 --> 0:39:34.799
<v Speaker 1>it's like the gas and the dust and other sort

0:39:34.840 --> 0:39:37.720
<v Speaker 1>of practical stuff, and in the case of the observable universe,

0:39:37.800 --> 0:39:40.600
<v Speaker 1>it's the speed of light. But yeah, it's a good analogy. However,

0:39:40.640 --> 0:39:42.359
<v Speaker 1>of course there's controversy about this.

0:39:42.520 --> 0:39:46.240
<v Speaker 2>Is it about the name beyond it? A dark flow

0:39:46.520 --> 0:39:49.200
<v Speaker 2>was maybe a terrible idea because it's not really dark.

0:39:51.360 --> 0:39:54.800
<v Speaker 1>It does kind of flow, though, the controversy is about

0:39:54.800 --> 0:39:57.759
<v Speaker 1>whether it exists. So this measurement was made originally with

0:39:57.800 --> 0:40:00.960
<v Speaker 1>like CMB data from the w MAP satellite, sort of

0:40:00.960 --> 0:40:04.200
<v Speaker 1>an intermediate satellite, not the most precise data we have

0:40:04.280 --> 0:40:06.240
<v Speaker 1>about the cosmic microwave background radiation.

0:40:06.480 --> 0:40:08.320
<v Speaker 2>Wait, wait, what is the WMAP.

0:40:08.400 --> 0:40:10.960
<v Speaker 1>I think it's named after Wilkinson. It's a satellite out

0:40:10.960 --> 0:40:14.839
<v Speaker 1>in space that picks up these CMB photons. They're very

0:40:14.920 --> 0:40:18.040
<v Speaker 1>very low energy photons, super long wavelengths. You need a

0:40:18.120 --> 0:40:20.520
<v Speaker 1>very sort of specialized equipment to pick them up. The

0:40:20.680 --> 0:40:22.920
<v Speaker 1>w MAP satellite is part of a long history of

0:40:22.960 --> 0:40:25.480
<v Speaker 1>these satellites. It was Kobe was the first one, then

0:40:25.680 --> 0:40:28.800
<v Speaker 1>w MAP and then PLANK these more and more precise

0:40:29.120 --> 0:40:31.880
<v Speaker 1>based telescope. Yeah, it's a space telescope. It's an instrument

0:40:31.960 --> 0:40:33.719
<v Speaker 1>out in space that picks up these photons.

0:40:34.320 --> 0:40:37.480
<v Speaker 2>And this one who specialize on the CMB and then

0:40:37.480 --> 0:40:40.520
<v Speaker 2>what we also used to measure the expansion and the

0:40:40.560 --> 0:40:42.560
<v Speaker 2>motion of these galaxies.

0:40:42.680 --> 0:40:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you can learn so much from the CMB. Absolutely,

0:40:45.920 --> 0:40:49.000
<v Speaker 1>very very general, very powerful. That's why WMAP is such

0:40:49.040 --> 0:40:51.880
<v Speaker 1>an important thing, and why Kobe won, why the Kobe

0:40:51.920 --> 0:40:55.160
<v Speaker 1>satellite folks won a Nobel prize, and why PLANK was

0:40:55.160 --> 0:40:58.280
<v Speaker 1>such an important thing. Plank is the follow up to WMAP. Anyway,

0:40:58.280 --> 0:41:01.240
<v Speaker 1>these results came from an analysis of seven hundred clusters

0:41:01.320 --> 0:41:03.719
<v Speaker 1>with the w MAP data, and then they reanalyze this

0:41:03.920 --> 0:41:06.480
<v Speaker 1>using the PLANK data, so more precise, more recent data,

0:41:06.600 --> 0:41:09.719
<v Speaker 1>larger data set. And there's a disagreement about the results there.

0:41:09.760 --> 0:41:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Like one group says, yes, we see the dark flow

0:41:12.040 --> 0:41:14.720
<v Speaker 1>in the PLANK data. Another group says, no, we analyze

0:41:14.760 --> 0:41:16.440
<v Speaker 1>that same data, we don't see anything.

0:41:16.760 --> 0:41:20.000
<v Speaker 2>What cann't They just crosscheck and figure out why they're different.

0:41:20.280 --> 0:41:22.719
<v Speaker 1>They're working on that but it's complicated because when you

0:41:22.800 --> 0:41:26.040
<v Speaker 1>do these analysis, there's so many assumptions, and two different

0:41:26.080 --> 0:41:28.920
<v Speaker 1>groups are going to make different assumptions, and those assumptions

0:41:28.960 --> 0:41:30.200
<v Speaker 1>are sometimes hard.

0:41:29.920 --> 0:41:31.960
<v Speaker 2>To spot, like what kind of assumptions.

0:41:32.200 --> 0:41:34.240
<v Speaker 1>Well, there's all sorts of details you need to understand

0:41:34.280 --> 0:41:37.560
<v Speaker 1>about how the CMB photons are boosted as they pass

0:41:37.640 --> 0:41:40.120
<v Speaker 1>through this hot gas, so people have a model of that.

0:41:40.160 --> 0:41:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Nobody's modeling all of the details of every individual photon

0:41:43.800 --> 0:41:47.040
<v Speaker 1>down to all the microphysics. It's always a simplification, and

0:41:47.120 --> 0:41:50.160
<v Speaker 1>how those simplifications are made, and whether they're valid, and

0:41:50.200 --> 0:41:53.719
<v Speaker 1>whether the simplifications introduce errors, and whether those errors are important.

0:41:53.840 --> 0:41:56.239
<v Speaker 1>There's a long series of decisions people make when they

0:41:56.239 --> 0:41:58.640
<v Speaker 1>analyze these data. That's why it's important to have cross

0:41:58.719 --> 0:42:02.239
<v Speaker 1>checks because helps you reveal where those decisions could be

0:42:02.280 --> 0:42:04.600
<v Speaker 1>biasing your results. So what that tells us is like,

0:42:04.640 --> 0:42:06.719
<v Speaker 1>there's something funky in one of these analyzes, and you're right,

0:42:06.719 --> 0:42:08.640
<v Speaker 1>they need to cross check and drill down. But it's

0:42:08.680 --> 0:42:10.799
<v Speaker 1>not trivial. It's not like they're doing the same calculation

0:42:11.080 --> 0:42:14.200
<v Speaker 1>and expect to get exactly the same number. They're probing

0:42:14.239 --> 0:42:16.520
<v Speaker 1>the same physical thing, but they're doing the calculation in

0:42:16.600 --> 0:42:17.360
<v Speaker 1>very different ways.

0:42:17.960 --> 0:42:21.239
<v Speaker 2>M I mean, couldn't they just like go to a

0:42:21.280 --> 0:42:25.520
<v Speaker 2>meeting together and figure it out, like I'm doing this,

0:42:25.719 --> 0:42:27.040
<v Speaker 2>what are you doing? Or are you doing that?

0:42:27.080 --> 0:42:27.239
<v Speaker 1>Oh?

0:42:27.239 --> 0:42:29.640
<v Speaker 2>Wait, that doesn't make any sense. What if you tried that?

0:42:30.480 --> 0:42:32.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? I think they are working on that. But I

0:42:32.280 --> 0:42:35.439
<v Speaker 1>think there's also a little bit of acrimony between these

0:42:35.480 --> 0:42:38.760
<v Speaker 1>two groups. I'm not sure it's always a friendly disagreement. Yes,

0:42:38.800 --> 0:42:43.840
<v Speaker 1>exactly is it dark drama? I mean, nobody's like murdering

0:42:43.880 --> 0:42:45.880
<v Speaker 1>other people's parents in the alleyway and leading them to

0:42:45.880 --> 0:42:48.400
<v Speaker 1>become the dark Knight of Justice or anything. It's not that.

0:42:48.320 --> 0:42:53.080
<v Speaker 2>Dark, but not yet apparently, stay tuned. Maybe there's a

0:42:53.080 --> 0:42:55.640
<v Speaker 2>Nobel prize at stake. Things will get ugly.

0:42:56.840 --> 0:42:59.600
<v Speaker 1>But what lies in the future is a deeper analysis

0:42:59.640 --> 0:43:02.160
<v Speaker 1>of this same data, and we hope maybe even more

0:43:02.200 --> 0:43:05.000
<v Speaker 1>refined data. Future measurements of the CNB can give us

0:43:05.000 --> 0:43:07.719
<v Speaker 1>an even clearer picture of what's out there, the motion

0:43:07.840 --> 0:43:10.640
<v Speaker 1>of the CMB and the motion of all these blobs

0:43:10.680 --> 0:43:13.480
<v Speaker 1>of gas and galaxies relative to the CMB.

0:43:13.760 --> 0:43:16.240
<v Speaker 2>So these folks are talking, and what are they saying

0:43:16.320 --> 0:43:19.680
<v Speaker 2>is maybe the probable cause if if there is a

0:43:19.719 --> 0:43:23.000
<v Speaker 2>relative motion to all these stars and galaxies around us.

0:43:23.040 --> 0:43:24.120
<v Speaker 2>What could be the cause of it?

0:43:24.360 --> 0:43:26.600
<v Speaker 1>So the only idea that's out there, if this thing

0:43:26.680 --> 0:43:29.640
<v Speaker 1>is real, is what we talked about earlier, some big

0:43:29.800 --> 0:43:33.320
<v Speaker 1>blob of stuff that's out there beyond our observable universe,

0:43:33.440 --> 0:43:37.239
<v Speaker 1>past our horizon, something very dense that once pulled on

0:43:37.360 --> 0:43:39.680
<v Speaker 1>all of us. So we all have this overall bias

0:43:39.719 --> 0:43:43.320
<v Speaker 1>in our peculiar motion. What that could be, nobody knows.

0:43:43.520 --> 0:43:46.560
<v Speaker 2>Wait, are you saying that maybe there was something bigger

0:43:46.560 --> 0:43:49.480
<v Speaker 2>than the observable universe that was pulling on all of

0:43:49.480 --> 0:43:52.359
<v Speaker 2>our galaxies that we can see, but now that it's

0:43:52.719 --> 0:43:55.240
<v Speaker 2>so far away from us, it doesn't affect us anymore,

0:43:55.400 --> 0:43:56.400
<v Speaker 2>or can't affect us.

0:43:56.680 --> 0:43:59.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's exactly right. Because the expansion of the universe

0:44:00.200 --> 0:44:03.560
<v Speaker 1>is faster than light. This expansion increases as distance grows,

0:44:03.880 --> 0:44:06.880
<v Speaker 1>and so things fall off the edge of our horizon.

0:44:07.280 --> 0:44:09.480
<v Speaker 1>There are some things which could interact with us, could

0:44:09.520 --> 0:44:12.839
<v Speaker 1>send us photons or pull on us, which now can

0:44:12.920 --> 0:44:16.360
<v Speaker 1>no longer. Like things near the edge of the observable universe.

0:44:16.360 --> 0:44:18.920
<v Speaker 1>We see photons from them, but some of them are

0:44:18.960 --> 0:44:21.839
<v Speaker 1>now past the edge of the observable universe, and if

0:44:21.840 --> 0:44:25.000
<v Speaker 1>they send us photons, those photons will never arrive because

0:44:25.000 --> 0:44:28.640
<v Speaker 1>space is expanding between us and those galaxies faster than

0:44:28.640 --> 0:44:31.719
<v Speaker 1>the speed of light. Sort of mind boggling to think about, right.

0:44:31.640 --> 0:44:34.440
<v Speaker 2>This thin gravity can only go as fast as the

0:44:34.440 --> 0:44:37.319
<v Speaker 2>speed of light. Right, so if something's moving or being

0:44:37.360 --> 0:44:39.759
<v Speaker 2>expanded away from most faster than the speed of light,

0:44:39.800 --> 0:44:41.680
<v Speaker 2>then even where we'll never feel it's gravity.

0:44:41.800 --> 0:44:44.359
<v Speaker 1>Exactly. Like if they shine a flashlight at you, you'll

0:44:44.400 --> 0:44:46.839
<v Speaker 1>never see it no matter how long you wait, which

0:44:46.880 --> 0:44:50.000
<v Speaker 1>also means you'll never feel its gravity. You might have

0:44:50.040 --> 0:44:52.560
<v Speaker 1>seen that flashlight earlier on, you might have felt their

0:44:52.600 --> 0:44:56.040
<v Speaker 1>gravity early on, but no longer. So again, this is

0:44:56.080 --> 0:44:57.920
<v Speaker 1>like a way to probe things that we might have

0:44:58.000 --> 0:45:01.000
<v Speaker 1>interacted with earlier in the history the universe that we

0:45:01.040 --> 0:45:02.120
<v Speaker 1>can no longer see.

0:45:02.320 --> 0:45:04.719
<v Speaker 2>You're saying, we'll see it like the spin it gave

0:45:04.840 --> 0:45:07.359
<v Speaker 2>us or the orbit it gave us.

0:45:07.480 --> 0:45:09.799
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly. It's sort of like what happens if you

0:45:09.840 --> 0:45:13.520
<v Speaker 1>walk into a party five seconds after some celebrity does right,

0:45:13.560 --> 0:45:15.759
<v Speaker 1>and everybody's looking in the same direction, and you're like,

0:45:15.760 --> 0:45:17.239
<v Speaker 1>what's going on? Who was just here?

0:45:17.440 --> 0:45:18.560
<v Speaker 2>Who was that? Was that badman?

0:45:20.560 --> 0:45:23.520
<v Speaker 1>Or was that Kim Kardashian or is Kim Kardashian actually batman?

0:45:24.400 --> 0:45:26.760
<v Speaker 1>And you see the effect on the conversations. In everybody's

0:45:26.800 --> 0:45:28.880
<v Speaker 1>head is pointing in some direction. You don't see the person,

0:45:28.920 --> 0:45:30.839
<v Speaker 1>but you see the effect they left on.

0:45:30.800 --> 0:45:33.279
<v Speaker 2>The room, or so we think, right, we still have

0:45:33.360 --> 0:45:34.520
<v Speaker 2>to confirm these measurements.

0:45:34.719 --> 0:45:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly. These are very difficult measurements to make. And

0:45:37.520 --> 0:45:39.920
<v Speaker 1>as you hear, there's not a consensus about whether the

0:45:40.000 --> 0:45:41.319
<v Speaker 1>dark flow is even a thing.

0:45:41.560 --> 0:45:45.000
<v Speaker 2>Well, boy, maybe should give it a different name. Would

0:45:45.000 --> 0:45:45.480
<v Speaker 2>you call it?

0:45:45.520 --> 0:45:47.520
<v Speaker 1>What would you call it? The dark Kardashian?

0:45:48.120 --> 0:45:50.600
<v Speaker 2>Well, I feel like the word dark didn't that originate

0:45:50.640 --> 0:45:53.160
<v Speaker 2>from the being invisible? Like dark matter. You can't see

0:45:53.160 --> 0:45:55.959
<v Speaker 2>it because it doesn't interact with the electromagnetic light. Because

0:45:56.040 --> 0:45:58.600
<v Speaker 2>if you're going to call anything that's mysterious dark, then

0:45:58.640 --> 0:45:59.719
<v Speaker 2>that's everything, isn't it.

0:46:00.080 --> 0:46:02.920
<v Speaker 1>The whole universe is kind of mysterious. I think that

0:46:03.040 --> 0:46:05.920
<v Speaker 1>dark means mysterious. It doesn't mean invisible because dark it

0:46:05.920 --> 0:46:08.800
<v Speaker 1>doesn't actually mean invisible, right, You can have invisible things

0:46:08.800 --> 0:46:12.239
<v Speaker 1>in bright light. Also, dark corners mean dark corners are

0:46:12.280 --> 0:46:14.200
<v Speaker 1>things that are like obscured, right, right.

0:46:14.239 --> 0:46:15.920
<v Speaker 2>But I guess what I mean is if you start

0:46:15.920 --> 0:46:19.160
<v Speaker 2>calling everything that's mysterious dark, then that's just going to

0:46:19.200 --> 0:46:20.080
<v Speaker 2>confuse everybody.

0:46:20.200 --> 0:46:21.359
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's probably true. Dark.

0:46:21.400 --> 0:46:24.760
<v Speaker 2>There's dark particles, there's you know, dark things in my fridge.

0:46:25.719 --> 0:46:29.080
<v Speaker 2>They're going to think people are thinking they're related to

0:46:29.160 --> 0:46:31.000
<v Speaker 2>dark matter and dark energy in the dark night.

0:46:31.280 --> 0:46:33.919
<v Speaker 1>Well, they're all mysterious, so they are all related in

0:46:33.920 --> 0:46:36.719
<v Speaker 1>that sense, the dark in the dark minds of physicists.

0:46:37.320 --> 0:46:39.759
<v Speaker 2>Maybe not in the physical in the physics sense, right.

0:46:39.719 --> 0:46:43.319
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, no, absolutely, they could have completely different physical explanations.

0:46:43.520 --> 0:46:45.400
<v Speaker 1>They're just currently not understood.

0:46:45.480 --> 0:46:47.080
<v Speaker 2>All right, Well, maybe you should just call it the

0:46:47.160 --> 0:46:49.239
<v Speaker 2>hubble flow and then just follow it up with we

0:46:49.280 --> 0:46:51.920
<v Speaker 2>don't know what the hubble flow is or what's causing.

0:46:51.760 --> 0:46:54.759
<v Speaker 1>It, but this is an addition to the hubble flow, Like,

0:46:55.200 --> 0:46:57.400
<v Speaker 1>what on top of the hubble flow is happening in

0:46:57.400 --> 0:46:58.880
<v Speaker 1>the universe? Is really the question?

0:46:59.320 --> 0:47:01.919
<v Speaker 2>All right? Well, it sounds like the answer once again

0:47:02.040 --> 0:47:05.880
<v Speaker 2>is stay tuned. There are mysterious workings in the universe,

0:47:05.920 --> 0:47:08.960
<v Speaker 2>mysterious flows plumbing that we can't yet see out there

0:47:09.000 --> 0:47:12.319
<v Speaker 2>in the universe that is hopefully leaking a little bit

0:47:12.360 --> 0:47:14.640
<v Speaker 2>so that we know and we can to study.

0:47:14.360 --> 0:47:16.400
<v Speaker 1>It, and we'd love to understand the universe, and so

0:47:16.440 --> 0:47:18.560
<v Speaker 1>we're looking out there into the nice sky and trying

0:47:18.560 --> 0:47:22.000
<v Speaker 1>to squeeze every tiny little drop of information out of

0:47:22.000 --> 0:47:24.920
<v Speaker 1>the photons that do arrive to us. And it's incredible

0:47:24.960 --> 0:47:26.719
<v Speaker 1>that we can even figure out that the universe is

0:47:26.760 --> 0:47:29.319
<v Speaker 1>out there and what it's doing, and maybe even get

0:47:29.320 --> 0:47:32.600
<v Speaker 1>a glimpse of what's past the edge of the observable universe.

0:47:32.800 --> 0:47:34.920
<v Speaker 2>I wonder if physicists are like Batman. You know, you're

0:47:34.920 --> 0:47:37.640
<v Speaker 2>looking up at the sky, you see a bad signal

0:47:37.760 --> 0:47:40.880
<v Speaker 2>in the motion of the stars, and you're like duty calls.

0:47:41.120 --> 0:47:45.879
<v Speaker 1>We're all totally ripped, just like Batman. Ripped. That wasn't

0:47:45.920 --> 0:47:47.080
<v Speaker 1>a joke, man, Why are you laughing?

0:47:48.200 --> 0:47:50.440
<v Speaker 2>Ripped in your minds and the abs of your minds

0:47:50.880 --> 0:47:56.640
<v Speaker 2>and in the biceps of your typing fingers. Well, in

0:47:56.680 --> 0:47:59.879
<v Speaker 2>any case, we hope you enjoyed that. Thanks for joining

0:47:59.920 --> 0:48:01.960
<v Speaker 2>us us see you next time.

0:48:06.360 --> 0:48:09.240
<v Speaker 1>For more science and curiosity, come find us on social

0:48:09.280 --> 0:48:14.160
<v Speaker 1>media where we answer questions and post videos. We're on Twitter, Disborg, Insta,

0:48:14.280 --> 0:48:17.720
<v Speaker 1>and now TikTok. Thanks for listening, and remember that Daniel

0:48:17.760 --> 0:48:21.200
<v Speaker 1>and Jorge Explain the Universe is a production of iHeartRadio.

0:48:21.480 --> 0:48:26.640
<v Speaker 1>For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple podcasts,

0:48:26.760 --> 0:48:29.120
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.