WEBVTT - Ask Us Anything

0:00:00.360 --> 0:00:03.400
<v Speaker 1>The Senator has been back in DC all week. There

0:00:03.480 --> 0:00:05.960
<v Speaker 1>is some bombshell news that's just come out about Mike

0:00:06.000 --> 0:00:09.640
<v Speaker 1>Flynn and the Russia investigation. But best of all, we're

0:00:09.640 --> 0:00:13.040
<v Speaker 1>going to be taking your questions live on this special

0:00:13.160 --> 0:00:16.720
<v Speaker 1>Ask Us Anything episode a Verdict, So send your questions

0:00:16.760 --> 0:00:18.960
<v Speaker 1>in now. We're gonna be taking them from Twitter using

0:00:19.040 --> 0:00:29.640
<v Speaker 1>the hashtag verdict. This is Verdict with Ted Cruz. Welcome

0:00:29.640 --> 0:00:31.520
<v Speaker 1>back to Verdict. How many times can I say verdict

0:00:31.520 --> 0:00:33.760
<v Speaker 1>in one minute? I guess we'll find out. I'm Michael Knowles.

0:00:33.840 --> 0:00:37.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm joined as ever by the Senator. Senator. Before we begin,

0:00:37.320 --> 0:00:42.000
<v Speaker 1>I gotta tell you your hair today looks excellent. Have

0:00:42.080 --> 0:00:45.239
<v Speaker 1>you have you done something new with it? Well? As

0:00:45.240 --> 0:00:47.960
<v Speaker 1>it so happens, I got a haircut this morning. I

0:00:48.080 --> 0:00:51.159
<v Speaker 1>got on a plane first thing this morning, and it

0:00:51.280 --> 0:00:54.960
<v Speaker 1>flew to Dallas and went to Shelley Luther, who, as

0:00:55.000 --> 0:00:58.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, she has a hair salon, and she was

0:00:58.160 --> 0:01:03.640
<v Speaker 1>sentenced insanely to seven days in jail for daring to

0:01:03.720 --> 0:01:07.679
<v Speaker 1>open a hair salon during the coronavirus crisis, and she

0:01:07.840 --> 0:01:11.800
<v Speaker 1>spent two nights in jail and then yesterday, thankfully, the

0:01:11.840 --> 0:01:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Texas Supreme Court unanimously ruled that she'd be released, and

0:01:16.280 --> 0:01:17.880
<v Speaker 1>so I got on a plane and flew up there

0:01:17.920 --> 0:01:20.400
<v Speaker 1>today to get a haircut. Well, she obviously did a

0:01:20.480 --> 0:01:23.120
<v Speaker 1>very good job. The hair looks good, and more importantly,

0:01:23.360 --> 0:01:26.360
<v Speaker 1>I think it's good to send that message out. There

0:01:26.400 --> 0:01:28.839
<v Speaker 1>have been a lot of oversteps during this whole lockdown,

0:01:29.160 --> 0:01:32.039
<v Speaker 1>pastors getting arrested and things like that. But I think

0:01:32.080 --> 0:01:34.800
<v Speaker 1>Shelley Luther she might take the cake. You know, she's

0:01:34.840 --> 0:01:37.319
<v Speaker 1>just dares to try to put some food on the

0:01:37.360 --> 0:01:41.040
<v Speaker 1>table for her kids, and some judge in Dallas decides

0:01:41.080 --> 0:01:44.920
<v Speaker 1>she's got to go to the slammer for seven days. Well,

0:01:44.959 --> 0:01:47.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, it really was outrageous, and if you haven't

0:01:47.640 --> 0:01:51.080
<v Speaker 1>seen it, i'd encourage folks watch the video of her sentencing.

0:01:51.760 --> 0:01:54.760
<v Speaker 1>I watched that when it came down, and the judge,

0:01:54.800 --> 0:01:58.840
<v Speaker 1>who was an elected Democrat in Dallas, he demands of her.

0:01:59.440 --> 0:02:04.560
<v Speaker 1>He says, apologize to the elected officials who issued these edicts,

0:02:04.560 --> 0:02:07.160
<v Speaker 1>and if you apologize to them, I won't send you

0:02:07.240 --> 0:02:11.399
<v Speaker 1>to jail. And to her credit, she says, I can't apologize.

0:02:11.440 --> 0:02:14.880
<v Speaker 1>I can't apologize for wanting people, wanting the people who

0:02:14.880 --> 0:02:16.480
<v Speaker 1>worked for me to be able to feed their kids.

0:02:16.680 --> 0:02:19.960
<v Speaker 1>I can't apologize for that. And you know, it was impressive.

0:02:20.880 --> 0:02:24.640
<v Speaker 1>She was not angry, she wasn't disrespectful, she was just

0:02:24.800 --> 0:02:28.320
<v Speaker 1>very matter of fact saying, look, these folks, they need

0:02:28.320 --> 0:02:32.800
<v Speaker 1>to feed their kids. They're hurting. And I gotta say

0:02:32.919 --> 0:02:37.560
<v Speaker 1>it is ridiculous. Elected officials don't have the right to

0:02:37.639 --> 0:02:41.120
<v Speaker 1>demand to the people apologize to me, that's not the

0:02:41.160 --> 0:02:44.400
<v Speaker 1>way it works in the United States. We work for

0:02:44.440 --> 0:02:47.280
<v Speaker 1>the people, not the other way around. And the arrogance

0:02:48.280 --> 0:02:52.720
<v Speaker 1>of our benevolent overlords demanding an apology from the citizenry,

0:02:53.520 --> 0:02:56.040
<v Speaker 1>it was ridiculous. I tweeted that out a couple of

0:02:56.120 --> 0:02:59.119
<v Speaker 1>days ago, how absurd it was. And I was really

0:02:59.160 --> 0:03:01.880
<v Speaker 1>glad to get a chance to meet her in person.

0:03:01.919 --> 0:03:05.400
<v Speaker 1>I'd never met her um and uh now now, my

0:03:05.560 --> 0:03:07.960
<v Speaker 1>dad and my cousin they had spoken to her boyfriend

0:03:07.960 --> 0:03:10.200
<v Speaker 1>on the phone when she was in jail. They had

0:03:10.240 --> 0:03:13.480
<v Speaker 1>actually prayed with with him on the phone, and my

0:03:13.520 --> 0:03:16.200
<v Speaker 1>cousin talked with Shelley just right when she got out

0:03:16.200 --> 0:03:20.399
<v Speaker 1>of jail. But I wanted to be there just to say, look,

0:03:20.400 --> 0:03:23.440
<v Speaker 1>we stand with you, and and and it is wrong

0:03:24.880 --> 0:03:28.400
<v Speaker 1>particularly you know what, you've got local officials that are

0:03:28.440 --> 0:03:31.959
<v Speaker 1>releasing violent criminals from jail because they say coronavirus, we

0:03:32.000 --> 0:03:34.720
<v Speaker 1>don't want it to spread. So they're releasing murderers, they're

0:03:34.920 --> 0:03:38.480
<v Speaker 1>they're releasing rapists and child molesters. But god forbid, you

0:03:38.520 --> 0:03:41.160
<v Speaker 1>have a hairdresser, Well, we need to lock her up

0:03:41.240 --> 0:03:45.280
<v Speaker 1>because she's not properly kissing the asses of the politicians

0:03:45.320 --> 0:03:49.880
<v Speaker 1>that that that that are issuing decrees. I was a

0:03:49.920 --> 0:03:52.000
<v Speaker 1>little pissed off. You can tell fair enough. I think

0:03:52.040 --> 0:03:53.920
<v Speaker 1>you should be. And I think it sends a great statement.

0:03:53.920 --> 0:03:56.040
<v Speaker 1>If we had a whole country full of Shelley Luther's,

0:03:56.080 --> 0:03:58.280
<v Speaker 1>I think probably the culture would be a whole lot healthier.

0:03:58.480 --> 0:04:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of unfair sentencing, there's another. And actually, hold on,

0:04:02.960 --> 0:04:04.800
<v Speaker 1>before we shifted that, I want to make one other

0:04:04.840 --> 0:04:09.280
<v Speaker 1>point that I made. We did a press conference afterwards,

0:04:09.320 --> 0:04:11.040
<v Speaker 1>and it's a point I made, but I haven't seen

0:04:11.120 --> 0:04:14.280
<v Speaker 1>in any of the coverage and it doesn't strike me

0:04:14.320 --> 0:04:19.520
<v Speaker 1>as entirely accidental. Which is listen, I hadn't had a haircut,

0:04:19.520 --> 0:04:20.720
<v Speaker 1>as you know we've been doing this. I'd had a

0:04:20.760 --> 0:04:22.400
<v Speaker 1>haircut in three months. Yeah, I was getting to be

0:04:22.440 --> 0:04:27.279
<v Speaker 1>that Smalls kind of tiger king. It was, Heidi said,

0:04:27.320 --> 0:04:30.320
<v Speaker 1>I was bringing mullets back, and you know, look, I

0:04:30.680 --> 0:04:33.320
<v Speaker 1>was going more for a BG's thing, but but Joe

0:04:33.360 --> 0:04:37.440
<v Speaker 1>dirt is an underappreciated look, so I'll go either way

0:04:37.480 --> 0:04:40.599
<v Speaker 1>on that. But you know, it was interesting this week

0:04:40.680 --> 0:04:44.640
<v Speaker 1>we were back in DC in the Senate, and I

0:04:44.680 --> 0:04:48.320
<v Speaker 1>couldn't help but look around at my colleagues, and it

0:04:48.480 --> 0:04:51.839
<v Speaker 1>sure looked like most of them had gotten a haircut.

0:04:54.320 --> 0:04:57.840
<v Speaker 1>And it's just kind of interesting for those who are

0:04:57.920 --> 0:05:03.560
<v Speaker 1>defending people's freedom. Fine, but we're seeing some politicians posture

0:05:03.640 --> 0:05:06.240
<v Speaker 1>how to how terrible it is, and and and and

0:05:06.240 --> 0:05:07.919
<v Speaker 1>and and it was a good thing that she should

0:05:07.960 --> 0:05:11.920
<v Speaker 1>be locked up. Well, it's just an interesting question who's

0:05:12.000 --> 0:05:16.359
<v Speaker 1>gotten a haircut? And how right haircuts? For me? But

0:05:16.440 --> 0:05:19.800
<v Speaker 1>not for thee as the prevailing wisdom, I think, Well,

0:05:19.800 --> 0:05:21.720
<v Speaker 1>what was it Bill de Blasio said when he went

0:05:21.760 --> 0:05:23.840
<v Speaker 1>to the gym after shutting down the gyms, Well, I've

0:05:23.880 --> 0:05:28.080
<v Speaker 1>got to stay healthy, like like, oh okay, not not

0:05:28.160 --> 0:05:32.120
<v Speaker 1>the people and and and look, it's also easy to

0:05:32.160 --> 0:05:36.200
<v Speaker 1>mischaracterize this. Nobody is saying that that that that that

0:05:36.400 --> 0:05:40.800
<v Speaker 1>everyone should just behave business as usual and ignore ignore

0:05:40.839 --> 0:05:44.320
<v Speaker 1>the epidemic, ignore the crisis. You know, Shelley at her

0:05:44.320 --> 0:05:46.279
<v Speaker 1>hair salon when when I got my hair cut, I

0:05:46.320 --> 0:05:48.440
<v Speaker 1>was wearing a mask. I was wearing gloves. She was

0:05:48.480 --> 0:05:51.320
<v Speaker 1>wearing a mask. All of the stylists that worked for

0:05:51.480 --> 0:05:54.640
<v Speaker 1>were wearing masks. They use disinfectant. They wipe down the

0:05:54.680 --> 0:05:58.800
<v Speaker 1>seat before I sat down. The stylists used disinfectant on

0:05:58.800 --> 0:06:00.680
<v Speaker 1>her hand. They're trying to be sad if they're trying

0:06:00.720 --> 0:06:04.919
<v Speaker 1>to use common sense measures to mitigate the spread of

0:06:04.920 --> 0:06:07.880
<v Speaker 1>the virus, but they're also trying to trying to let

0:06:08.520 --> 0:06:11.360
<v Speaker 1>these stylists be able to feed their kids, right right, Yeah,

0:06:11.520 --> 0:06:14.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, being able to feed your family is important

0:06:14.000 --> 0:06:17.120
<v Speaker 1>to public health as well. And you know, you have

0:06:17.160 --> 0:06:20.560
<v Speaker 1>the Shelley Luther case that was obviously this gross miscarriage

0:06:20.560 --> 0:06:23.280
<v Speaker 1>of justice and then luckily got overturned yet another one

0:06:23.320 --> 0:06:26.080
<v Speaker 1>on the national level, which just came out yesterday. This

0:06:26.160 --> 0:06:28.840
<v Speaker 1>was the case of Michael Flynn. He was selected by

0:06:28.880 --> 0:06:32.160
<v Speaker 1>President Trump to become the National Security Advisor. He was

0:06:32.240 --> 0:06:35.120
<v Speaker 1>then we were told, a traitor to his country, he

0:06:35.240 --> 0:06:37.480
<v Speaker 1>colluded with Russia. He was going to go to jail,

0:06:37.640 --> 0:06:41.239
<v Speaker 1>people told us. And then the dj dropped the case

0:06:41.400 --> 0:06:45.720
<v Speaker 1>yesterday and Michael Flynn, from what we can tell totally exonerated. Well,

0:06:46.160 --> 0:06:49.280
<v Speaker 1>obviously don't have a law degree. What was going on here?

0:06:49.320 --> 0:06:52.479
<v Speaker 1>What does this mean for the DOJ, for the Obama administration,

0:06:52.560 --> 0:06:55.880
<v Speaker 1>for politics? Look that there are a couple of things

0:06:55.920 --> 0:06:58.960
<v Speaker 1>at play here. One, Michael Flynn is a decorated general

0:06:59.000 --> 0:07:03.200
<v Speaker 1>and he as a leader until he was fired by

0:07:03.200 --> 0:07:07.760
<v Speaker 1>the Obama administration because he had the courage to resist

0:07:08.080 --> 0:07:12.600
<v Speaker 1>some of their willingness to just whitewash and and and

0:07:12.880 --> 0:07:19.120
<v Speaker 1>cover up radical Islamic terrorists and be apologists for Islamism.

0:07:19.160 --> 0:07:21.720
<v Speaker 1>He lost his job for that. But but it's interesting

0:07:21.760 --> 0:07:24.720
<v Speaker 1>that you know, there's been a lot said about the

0:07:24.720 --> 0:07:28.880
<v Speaker 1>deep state. The deep state despises him for that, and

0:07:29.960 --> 0:07:34.400
<v Speaker 1>what has come out recently about the prosecution has really

0:07:34.440 --> 0:07:38.480
<v Speaker 1>been disgraceful. How the Department of Justice, the FBI. I mean,

0:07:38.520 --> 0:07:42.000
<v Speaker 1>they were politicized at a level under Barack Obama that's

0:07:42.000 --> 0:07:46.360
<v Speaker 1>never happened before. They were turned into political weapons. And

0:07:46.760 --> 0:07:49.080
<v Speaker 1>I got to say the notes that have been released

0:07:49.120 --> 0:07:53.160
<v Speaker 1>of the senior folks going after Flynn, where they say

0:07:52.920 --> 0:07:57.440
<v Speaker 1>say the objective was to get him to lie h

0:07:58.760 --> 0:08:01.120
<v Speaker 1>that so that we can either convict him for lying

0:08:01.680 --> 0:08:05.440
<v Speaker 1>or get him fired. Right, get him fired. I mean

0:08:05.520 --> 0:08:09.480
<v Speaker 1>it was I gotta say, I commend Bill Barr. What

0:08:09.600 --> 0:08:13.680
<v Speaker 1>Bill Barr has done, frankly takes backbone because the media

0:08:13.800 --> 0:08:18.320
<v Speaker 1>is savaging because he came in as Attorney General and

0:08:18.480 --> 0:08:20.920
<v Speaker 1>said he was going to follow the law and there

0:08:21.000 --> 0:08:23.840
<v Speaker 1>was going to be accountability, and he directed a US

0:08:23.880 --> 0:08:27.200
<v Speaker 1>attorney to review this case, and all of these records

0:08:27.240 --> 0:08:30.440
<v Speaker 1>that had been hidden were suddenly made public, and and

0:08:30.440 --> 0:08:33.760
<v Speaker 1>and and Barr made the determination, DIOJ made the determination

0:08:34.040 --> 0:08:37.640
<v Speaker 1>that there was not sufficient evidence. What this was was

0:08:37.679 --> 0:08:41.319
<v Speaker 1>a phishing expedition. Yeah, where they wanted to get rid

0:08:41.360 --> 0:08:44.400
<v Speaker 1>of Flynn. And you know, they were getting ready to

0:08:44.440 --> 0:08:48.440
<v Speaker 1>close the case until Peter Struck, this hard partisan dam

0:08:48.760 --> 0:08:52.319
<v Speaker 1>who as all of these you know, nasty partisan text

0:08:52.400 --> 0:08:54.400
<v Speaker 1>back and forth with with a woman with whom he

0:08:54.440 --> 0:09:00.040
<v Speaker 1>was having an affair. Peter Struck said, keep keep the

0:09:00.080 --> 0:09:03.440
<v Speaker 1>case open. And what's interesting about it when they went

0:09:03.520 --> 0:09:07.560
<v Speaker 1>to interview Michael Flynn. You know, Komey has been bragging

0:09:07.600 --> 0:09:09.679
<v Speaker 1>about how he convinced them. I don't know, you don't

0:09:09.720 --> 0:09:11.160
<v Speaker 1>need a lawyer, You don't need a lawyer, you don't

0:09:11.160 --> 0:09:14.760
<v Speaker 1>need to tell the White House counts. No, we're just chatting. No, big,

0:09:15.400 --> 0:09:19.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, just hanging out and it was an old

0:09:19.880 --> 0:09:24.239
<v Speaker 1>fashioned game of entrapment. And by the way, the alleged

0:09:24.320 --> 0:09:29.120
<v Speaker 1>predicate for this is the Logan Act. Now look, most

0:09:29.120 --> 0:09:31.320
<v Speaker 1>people don't know what the Logan Act is. I'll tell you.

0:09:31.360 --> 0:09:34.760
<v Speaker 1>The Logan Act is uttering complete garbage. It is a

0:09:34.760 --> 0:09:37.640
<v Speaker 1>bill that is ostensibly in the US Code that that

0:09:38.200 --> 0:09:41.439
<v Speaker 1>makes it a crime for a private citizen to interact

0:09:41.440 --> 0:09:46.480
<v Speaker 1>and conduct foreign policy with with with foreign leaders. Here's

0:09:46.480 --> 0:09:52.320
<v Speaker 1>the problem. In two centuries, it has been enforced zero times,

0:09:53.679 --> 0:09:56.640
<v Speaker 1>and there's a reason for it. There's no constitutional basis

0:09:56.679 --> 0:10:00.760
<v Speaker 1>for it, and it is something that that is routine.

0:10:01.000 --> 0:10:05.640
<v Speaker 1>I guarantee you today, Michael, I guarantee you John Kerry

0:10:05.720 --> 0:10:08.720
<v Speaker 1>violated the Logan Gact. Certainly he did by the Logan

0:10:08.760 --> 0:10:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Act as a crime. Because John Kerry runs around bragging

0:10:13.440 --> 0:10:16.880
<v Speaker 1>about how he's telling the Iranians, don't worry, we'll come

0:10:16.920 --> 0:10:21.559
<v Speaker 1>back to the deal. Ignore. Ignore President Trump's foreign policy.

0:10:22.160 --> 0:10:24.959
<v Speaker 1>You have Democrats all the time who run around and

0:10:25.320 --> 0:10:27.880
<v Speaker 1>engage in foreign policy in folks out of office. And

0:10:28.240 --> 0:10:32.560
<v Speaker 1>let's be clear. So the alleged violation for Flynn, it's

0:10:32.600 --> 0:10:37.199
<v Speaker 1>important to understand this. He's a retired general. He's just

0:10:37.320 --> 0:10:41.840
<v Speaker 1>been named the incoming national security advisor for the new president.

0:10:41.880 --> 0:10:44.760
<v Speaker 1>This is after the presidential election, so the incoming national

0:10:44.760 --> 0:10:47.240
<v Speaker 1>security advisor is putting his team together to come in

0:10:47.559 --> 0:10:53.040
<v Speaker 1>and lead the president's national security team. And what they

0:10:53.040 --> 0:10:55.439
<v Speaker 1>were allegedly investigating him is that he talked to the

0:10:55.520 --> 0:10:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Russian ambassador. I guarantee you every single national security advice

0:11:00.559 --> 0:11:05.280
<v Speaker 1>going back to the staff of George Washington, was talking

0:11:06.360 --> 0:11:09.520
<v Speaker 1>to our allies and our enemies that that's actually what

0:11:09.640 --> 0:11:13.839
<v Speaker 1>you want leaders in government to do. And so it

0:11:14.559 --> 0:11:20.960
<v Speaker 1>was an assinine phishing expedition based on a laughable claim,

0:11:22.080 --> 0:11:26.000
<v Speaker 1>and it was all the entire game was, well, let's

0:11:26.040 --> 0:11:29.400
<v Speaker 1>get him on tape and then let's interview him and

0:11:29.440 --> 0:11:31.480
<v Speaker 1>see if he says something that contradicts what he says

0:11:31.480 --> 0:11:34.280
<v Speaker 1>on tape. And and I got to say, look, prosecutors

0:11:34.320 --> 0:11:36.559
<v Speaker 1>have played that game all the time. There's a reason

0:11:36.600 --> 0:11:39.720
<v Speaker 1>in trapment is not allowed because because you're just trying

0:11:39.720 --> 0:11:42.120
<v Speaker 1>to you're trying to set up what's called a perjury trap.

0:11:42.720 --> 0:11:48.320
<v Speaker 1>And it was obvious that that these partisan, these partisans

0:11:48.320 --> 0:11:51.800
<v Speaker 1>who who were at the helm of DJ and FBI,

0:11:52.040 --> 0:11:54.280
<v Speaker 1>that that was the game they were playing. And it

0:11:54.320 --> 0:11:58.000
<v Speaker 1>wasn't law enforcement. And I think Bill Barr showed a

0:11:58.000 --> 0:12:00.439
<v Speaker 1>lot of courage for saying we're going to follow the

0:12:00.520 --> 0:12:03.959
<v Speaker 1>law and not let this be just just a a

0:12:04.360 --> 0:12:07.640
<v Speaker 1>partisan hammer. Right the way you can tell in the

0:12:07.720 --> 0:12:10.320
<v Speaker 1>notes that were released from the FBI, the way you

0:12:10.320 --> 0:12:13.840
<v Speaker 1>can tell that this wasn't even just a regular you know,

0:12:14.040 --> 0:12:18.680
<v Speaker 1>investigation or entrapment is that phrase, or get him fired.

0:12:18.840 --> 0:12:20.400
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't just we're gonna see if we catch him

0:12:20.400 --> 0:12:21.960
<v Speaker 1>in a lie, or we'll get him to admit it

0:12:22.040 --> 0:12:24.160
<v Speaker 1>was that, or get him fired. They had a political

0:12:24.200 --> 0:12:28.320
<v Speaker 1>interest in getting this appointee removed. So it's great that

0:12:28.360 --> 0:12:30.280
<v Speaker 1>this is coming to light, I know that. And there's

0:12:30.280 --> 0:12:32.360
<v Speaker 1>an old crudge, there's I mean, remember he had been

0:12:32.360 --> 0:12:35.959
<v Speaker 1>fired from the Obama administration. They didn't like that he

0:12:36.040 --> 0:12:39.440
<v Speaker 1>was outing what the administration was doing, and they were

0:12:39.600 --> 0:12:41.679
<v Speaker 1>they were mad at him, and and and that that

0:12:41.800 --> 0:12:45.040
<v Speaker 1>was evidenced by by the partisan attack. That's right. So

0:12:45.160 --> 0:12:48.520
<v Speaker 1>we're and of course the irony of all of this

0:12:50.280 --> 0:12:53.440
<v Speaker 1>is that the media and the Democrats are savaging bar

0:12:53.840 --> 0:12:56.959
<v Speaker 1>yeah for being partisan. I mean, I mean, it is

0:12:57.000 --> 0:13:00.440
<v Speaker 1>the biggest case of projection because he says that Apartment

0:13:00.440 --> 0:13:03.120
<v Speaker 1>of Justice is not going to be a partisan cudgel.

0:13:03.800 --> 0:13:07.000
<v Speaker 1>They accuse him of being partisan, and it's it's it's

0:13:07.040 --> 0:13:09.280
<v Speaker 1>a game, and I think a lot of people are

0:13:09.320 --> 0:13:11.599
<v Speaker 1>sick of that game. Absolutely. So we've got about a

0:13:11.640 --> 0:13:14.880
<v Speaker 1>million questions here from the viewers. Obviously this is live,

0:13:15.160 --> 0:13:17.880
<v Speaker 1>so send your questions in now on Twitter with the

0:13:17.920 --> 0:13:21.480
<v Speaker 1>hashtag verdict. First one is from Rhino Dino. I don't

0:13:21.520 --> 0:13:23.720
<v Speaker 1>think that's his name at birth. I think that's the

0:13:23.720 --> 0:13:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Twitter name. When does an executive's emergency power? Yeah, there's

0:13:27.480 --> 0:13:29.880
<v Speaker 1>some colleagues of mine that go by that. From Rhino

0:13:29.960 --> 0:13:33.400
<v Speaker 1>Dinah's that is true. It's a little long in the

0:13:33.400 --> 0:13:37.080
<v Speaker 1>tooth in that institution. When does an executive's emergency power

0:13:37.240 --> 0:13:41.320
<v Speaker 1>overstep the constitution? Are there any rights that are absolute

0:13:41.440 --> 0:13:44.680
<v Speaker 1>regardless of circumstance. Should there be a way for the

0:13:44.800 --> 0:13:48.360
<v Speaker 1>legislature of the state or federal government to end a

0:13:48.400 --> 0:13:53.480
<v Speaker 1>state of emergency or a lockdown? I suppose. So. Look,

0:13:53.480 --> 0:13:56.120
<v Speaker 1>that's a that's a complicated question, and even the question

0:13:56.160 --> 0:14:00.480
<v Speaker 1>an executive there's a difference between the president, a governor,

0:14:00.920 --> 0:14:09.280
<v Speaker 1>a mayor in times of emergency. The constitutional law has

0:14:09.320 --> 0:14:13.120
<v Speaker 1>always given some degree of discretion and some degree of

0:14:13.280 --> 0:14:17.640
<v Speaker 1>deference to emergency powers that are short term, that are temporary,

0:14:17.840 --> 0:14:20.960
<v Speaker 1>that are designed to address the emergency. Now you can

0:14:21.040 --> 0:14:24.280
<v Speaker 1>go too far. So for example, there's the famous steel

0:14:24.320 --> 0:14:29.320
<v Speaker 1>seizure cases where the federal government tried to seize steel mills.

0:14:29.320 --> 0:14:31.120
<v Speaker 1>In the Supreme Court said, no, you can't do that.

0:14:31.120 --> 0:14:36.040
<v Speaker 1>That's going too far. You know, when it comes to pandemics,

0:14:36.880 --> 0:14:39.880
<v Speaker 1>there is the authority to quarantine people, and that's that's

0:14:39.880 --> 0:14:43.200
<v Speaker 1>actually got a long history and pedigree. Now you think

0:14:43.200 --> 0:14:45.840
<v Speaker 1>about it. In an ordinary case, the government can't come

0:14:45.880 --> 0:14:47.480
<v Speaker 1>along and say, Michael, we're going to lock you in

0:14:47.520 --> 0:14:50.040
<v Speaker 1>one place and not let you go for something that

0:14:50.080 --> 0:14:52.840
<v Speaker 1>you didn't do. Like normally, to be locked up, you

0:14:52.920 --> 0:14:54.760
<v Speaker 1>got to do something, You got to break the law

0:14:55.040 --> 0:15:00.200
<v Speaker 1>to be locked up. Quarantines are an accepted exception into

0:15:00.320 --> 0:15:03.360
<v Speaker 1>that if you have a contagious disease and or a

0:15:03.400 --> 0:15:06.960
<v Speaker 1>threat to others. But you know what we're seeing where

0:15:06.960 --> 0:15:09.440
<v Speaker 1>it crosses the line. We're seeing it every day in

0:15:09.480 --> 0:15:11.960
<v Speaker 1>the course of this crisis. We're seeing it was Shelley

0:15:12.040 --> 0:15:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Luthor locking someone up seven days in jail for cutting hair.

0:15:15.880 --> 0:15:20.640
<v Speaker 1>That's ridiculous. We're seeing it in Colorado with the dad

0:15:20.720 --> 0:15:22.880
<v Speaker 1>who was who was playing softball with a six year

0:15:22.920 --> 0:15:25.240
<v Speaker 1>old daughter in a public park and they threatened to

0:15:25.280 --> 0:15:29.200
<v Speaker 1>give him a ticket. There Pennsylvania, where they gave a

0:15:29.240 --> 0:15:32.680
<v Speaker 1>woman a ticket for driving a car. She didn't violate

0:15:32.680 --> 0:15:34.680
<v Speaker 1>any laws by the way, she was driving a car alone,

0:15:35.080 --> 0:15:37.360
<v Speaker 1>She posed no public health threat to anyone, and yet

0:15:37.360 --> 0:15:39.920
<v Speaker 1>she got a ticket. We saw the governor of New Jersey,

0:15:39.960 --> 0:15:46.600
<v Speaker 1>a Democrat, who said, well, figuring out the constitution, that

0:15:46.600 --> 0:15:49.520
<v Speaker 1>that's above my pay grade. Well, no, actually, as governor

0:15:49.520 --> 0:15:51.920
<v Speaker 1>of New Jersey, the oath you take is an oath

0:15:51.960 --> 0:15:55.040
<v Speaker 1>to uphold the Constitution. It's not above your pay grade.

0:15:55.360 --> 0:16:00.480
<v Speaker 1>So are there are exceptions and for example, in times

0:16:00.520 --> 0:16:03.640
<v Speaker 1>of war a president it can suspend habeas corpus, but

0:16:03.720 --> 0:16:07.280
<v Speaker 1>in limited circumstances. And what the Supreme Court has said

0:16:08.200 --> 0:16:12.480
<v Speaker 1>is that the power of the government is at its

0:16:12.520 --> 0:16:16.360
<v Speaker 1>height when the executive and the legislature are joined together,

0:16:16.440 --> 0:16:18.720
<v Speaker 1>because they're a check on each other, right, And so

0:16:18.800 --> 0:16:21.200
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't mean it's unlimited, but it is at its

0:16:21.280 --> 0:16:24.480
<v Speaker 1>highest point when they are working together, and you have

0:16:25.000 --> 0:16:28.480
<v Speaker 1>multiple branches of government together. They are at the lowest

0:16:28.520 --> 0:16:30.600
<v Speaker 1>point at the federal level, where the executive is on

0:16:30.480 --> 0:16:32.760
<v Speaker 1>one side and the legislature is on the other because

0:16:32.800 --> 0:16:38.680
<v Speaker 1>those two are in conflict. And what's interesting, Look, this

0:16:39.040 --> 0:16:44.760
<v Speaker 1>crisis reveals character and they're just a lot of petty

0:16:44.800 --> 0:16:49.000
<v Speaker 1>authoritarians running around, right. Many of them are Democrats, but

0:16:49.080 --> 0:16:56.440
<v Speaker 1>not all. And they just like power. You know, California,

0:16:56.480 --> 0:16:57.960
<v Speaker 1>I sent out a video of that. You know, they

0:16:58.000 --> 0:17:02.200
<v Speaker 1>pulled out bulldozers and filled a skate park with sand

0:17:03.120 --> 0:17:06.200
<v Speaker 1>to stop teenagers from skating. And I took the chance

0:17:06.200 --> 0:17:08.840
<v Speaker 1>to tweet out and said, okay, skaters, this this is

0:17:08.880 --> 0:17:11.159
<v Speaker 1>what big government lefties want to do. They want to

0:17:11.160 --> 0:17:13.879
<v Speaker 1>take away your freedom and this is stupid. And by

0:17:13.920 --> 0:17:17.000
<v Speaker 1>the way, it would have been perfectly fine for them

0:17:17.040 --> 0:17:19.879
<v Speaker 1>to insist on social distancing. Say, listen, we're in the

0:17:19.920 --> 0:17:22.679
<v Speaker 1>middle of a public health crisis. You need to spread

0:17:22.680 --> 0:17:25.840
<v Speaker 1>out a little bit. But the idea that you can't

0:17:25.880 --> 0:17:28.040
<v Speaker 1>go outside, that you can't go to the beach, that

0:17:28.119 --> 0:17:31.560
<v Speaker 1>you can't paddleboard, that you can't go jogging, all of

0:17:31.600 --> 0:17:35.040
<v Speaker 1>that is an overreach. And it's an overreach because people

0:17:35.160 --> 0:17:39.560
<v Speaker 1>are statists, are gonna status that's what they do, and

0:17:40.200 --> 0:17:42.280
<v Speaker 1>that's not right. And there's I guess the question a

0:17:42.320 --> 0:17:44.359
<v Speaker 1>lot of people are asking is is there some hard

0:17:44.359 --> 0:17:47.040
<v Speaker 1>and fast rules. So you know, the government is allowed

0:17:47.080 --> 0:17:49.399
<v Speaker 1>to fill the skate park with sand, but it's not

0:17:49.440 --> 0:17:51.720
<v Speaker 1>allowed to stop the paddle boarder. I mean, obviously there's

0:17:51.760 --> 0:17:54.960
<v Speaker 1>no way you could control for all of these details.

0:17:55.200 --> 0:17:57.800
<v Speaker 1>So how do we know when the government's gone too far?

0:17:59.320 --> 0:18:02.560
<v Speaker 1>It listened. There is no magic rule on it. You've

0:18:02.600 --> 0:18:06.040
<v Speaker 1>got the Bill of Rights and so for example, all right,

0:18:06.119 --> 0:18:09.119
<v Speaker 1>let's take religious liberty. Yeah, religious liberty is a hard

0:18:09.280 --> 0:18:15.879
<v Speaker 1>question in this circumstance because, for example, churches, Um, Heidi

0:18:15.960 --> 0:18:18.320
<v Speaker 1>and I go to First Baptist Church in Houston. It's

0:18:18.320 --> 0:18:22.120
<v Speaker 1>a big church. My pastor is a good friend. Our

0:18:22.240 --> 0:18:24.920
<v Speaker 1>church hasn't met in person for two months. Yeah, it's

0:18:24.920 --> 0:18:27.760
<v Speaker 1>really strange. I mean, we do our family. We do

0:18:27.880 --> 0:18:30.480
<v Speaker 1>church on Sunday mornings where we I log on on

0:18:30.600 --> 0:18:32.840
<v Speaker 1>my phone and and and put it on the TV

0:18:33.000 --> 0:18:35.560
<v Speaker 1>and we watch it in our living room. Hum. Now,

0:18:35.560 --> 0:18:37.520
<v Speaker 1>the church is planning to start meeting at the end

0:18:37.560 --> 0:18:39.879
<v Speaker 1>of the month, and I've talked with with our pastor

0:18:39.880 --> 0:18:42.439
<v Speaker 1>about it. He doesn't want to spread the disease. He

0:18:42.480 --> 0:18:45.480
<v Speaker 1>doesn't want to contribute to people getting sick or losing

0:18:45.480 --> 0:18:49.040
<v Speaker 1>their lives. That's I think that's a reasonable common sense

0:18:49.640 --> 0:18:55.400
<v Speaker 1>judgment for pastors to make. We've seen Bill de Blasio

0:18:56.240 --> 0:18:59.680
<v Speaker 1>where he threatened if a church or synagogue dares meet,

0:19:00.800 --> 0:19:05.800
<v Speaker 1>I will shut you down permanently. Yeah. Who the hell

0:19:05.840 --> 0:19:08.639
<v Speaker 1>are you to shut a church or synagogue down permanently?

0:19:08.680 --> 0:19:11.840
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, Nablasio also, you know he showed

0:19:11.920 --> 0:19:16.000
<v Speaker 1>up at the funeral of a revered rabbi to personally

0:19:16.080 --> 0:19:19.919
<v Speaker 1>disburse the crowd and then send out this tweet threatening

0:19:19.960 --> 0:19:23.639
<v Speaker 1>the Jewish community. You know why exactly is he singling

0:19:23.680 --> 0:19:27.000
<v Speaker 1>out the Jewish community again? I mean that you start

0:19:27.080 --> 0:19:32.400
<v Speaker 1>to reveal the willingness to persecute people because of faith. Yes,

0:19:32.440 --> 0:19:37.320
<v Speaker 1>you can, you can work to protect public safety. But

0:19:37.359 --> 0:19:42.240
<v Speaker 1>when you start signaling it, singling out faith and religious

0:19:42.280 --> 0:19:45.760
<v Speaker 1>exercise or speech and punishing what you don't like, that's

0:19:45.800 --> 0:19:48.359
<v Speaker 1>when you clearly cross the line. Right now, speaking of

0:19:48.400 --> 0:19:51.000
<v Speaker 1>some maybe clearer steps we could be taking, this comes

0:19:51.000 --> 0:19:53.960
<v Speaker 1>in from Aunt Betty. What actions are being taken right

0:19:54.000 --> 0:19:58.520
<v Speaker 1>now to remove Chinese Communist Party sponsored programs in higher

0:19:58.600 --> 0:20:02.640
<v Speaker 1>education and public school rules, Confucius schools and jong Su.

0:20:02.720 --> 0:20:04.959
<v Speaker 1>I don't even know what those are. I do know

0:20:05.000 --> 0:20:08.639
<v Speaker 1>that the Chinese government has infiltrated some educational institutions. There

0:20:08.680 --> 0:20:12.280
<v Speaker 1>are there steps to remove them. So there are so

0:20:12.359 --> 0:20:15.879
<v Speaker 1>Confucius institutes have been established at universities all over the country,

0:20:15.920 --> 0:20:19.520
<v Speaker 1>and they're typically funded by the Chinese government, and they

0:20:19.640 --> 0:20:23.840
<v Speaker 1>serve as propaganda arms that they serve as efforts that

0:20:23.960 --> 0:20:30.000
<v Speaker 1>they offer universities help on Chinese language instruction. Yeah. And

0:20:29.800 --> 0:20:34.879
<v Speaker 1>and China's approach is they use their vast economic resources

0:20:35.040 --> 0:20:38.159
<v Speaker 1>a little bit like a drug dealer going to a

0:20:38.240 --> 0:20:40.880
<v Speaker 1>junior or high where they say, you know, hey, kid,

0:20:41.000 --> 0:20:44.400
<v Speaker 1>let me give you a free sample. Yeah. So Chinese

0:20:44.440 --> 0:20:47.080
<v Speaker 1>communists go to universities and say the same thing. Hey,

0:20:47.080 --> 0:20:50.720
<v Speaker 1>we'll give you really cheap or even free Chinese language instruction.

0:20:50.760 --> 0:20:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Isn't this great? And all you have to do is

0:20:53.160 --> 0:20:56.159
<v Speaker 1>let us conduct espionage on your campus and and let

0:20:56.280 --> 0:20:59.159
<v Speaker 1>us let us push propaganda. So Tianamen Square, Nope, never

0:20:59.200 --> 0:21:02.080
<v Speaker 1>heard of it. There is no Eneman Square. So the

0:21:02.160 --> 0:21:05.760
<v Speaker 1>question is is there anything we can do? Yes. So

0:21:05.800 --> 0:21:09.600
<v Speaker 1>several years ago I introduced and passed legislation on the

0:21:09.640 --> 0:21:13.199
<v Speaker 1>Senate Armed Services Committee, got bipartisan support, and got it

0:21:13.240 --> 0:21:18.040
<v Speaker 1>written into law, a restriction and a prohibition on Department

0:21:18.080 --> 0:21:22.480
<v Speaker 1>of Defense funding if a university has a Confucius institute

0:21:23.200 --> 0:21:25.399
<v Speaker 1>on campus, and it was like, look, we're not going

0:21:25.480 --> 0:21:28.520
<v Speaker 1>to send your d D money if you've got an

0:21:28.520 --> 0:21:32.480
<v Speaker 1>outlet for the Chinese government right there. And that legislation

0:21:32.520 --> 0:21:34.919
<v Speaker 1>that I authored and passed into law has resulted in

0:21:34.960 --> 0:21:39.800
<v Speaker 1>over a dozen of those confucious institutes shutting down. I'll

0:21:39.800 --> 0:21:42.920
<v Speaker 1>give you another example is actually legislation I just introduced

0:21:42.960 --> 0:21:48.040
<v Speaker 1>this week. Phoenix TV. It is a TV station owned

0:21:48.080 --> 0:21:51.040
<v Speaker 1>by the Chinese government. Do you remember the exchange. It

0:21:51.119 --> 0:21:52.720
<v Speaker 1>was a couple of weeks ago at a White House

0:21:52.720 --> 0:21:56.800
<v Speaker 1>press conference. There was that report, this reporter and she

0:21:56.960 --> 0:22:00.439
<v Speaker 1>was questioning the president and I got to give President

0:22:00.440 --> 0:22:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Trump credit here. He said, you know who do you

0:22:02.040 --> 0:22:05.080
<v Speaker 1>work for? China? She goes, no, no, no, Hong Kong.

0:22:05.640 --> 0:22:08.119
<v Speaker 1>And I don't know if he had been brief beforehand

0:22:08.240 --> 0:22:11.480
<v Speaker 1>or if he just had good instincts on the moment,

0:22:11.560 --> 0:22:14.879
<v Speaker 1>But it turns out yes, in their name it's Hong Kong,

0:22:14.920 --> 0:22:17.679
<v Speaker 1>but it's controlled by the Chinese government and it is

0:22:17.760 --> 0:22:25.960
<v Speaker 1>a propaganda outlet. And in the US, so that same company,

0:22:26.000 --> 0:22:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Phoenix TV, purchased a radio station in Mexico which has

0:22:31.359 --> 0:22:34.959
<v Speaker 1>a huge transmitter pointed north, pointed at the United States,

0:22:35.440 --> 0:22:38.800
<v Speaker 1>and they changed it from a Spanish language station to

0:22:38.880 --> 0:22:43.040
<v Speaker 1>a Chinese language station, and they put in an application

0:22:43.119 --> 0:22:47.000
<v Speaker 1>at the FCC to broadcast into the US. Now, two

0:22:47.119 --> 0:22:49.159
<v Speaker 1>years ago, in twenty eighteen, I sent a letter to

0:22:49.160 --> 0:22:54.280
<v Speaker 1>the FCC saying, don't let a propaganda station owned by

0:22:54.280 --> 0:22:57.480
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese government broadcast propaganda into the US, and the

0:22:57.520 --> 0:23:02.159
<v Speaker 1>FCC denied them their license. Now, unfortunately, the way it

0:23:02.200 --> 0:23:05.560
<v Speaker 1>works under the FCC is they even though they'd been denied,

0:23:05.600 --> 0:23:08.480
<v Speaker 1>they appealed and they got a provisional license while the

0:23:08.520 --> 0:23:13.560
<v Speaker 1>appeals pending. So right now you're in California. This TV

0:23:13.760 --> 0:23:18.080
<v Speaker 1>station is broadcasting, saturating southern California. At times it makes

0:23:18.080 --> 0:23:22.760
<v Speaker 1>it all the way up to northern California Chinese language

0:23:22.800 --> 0:23:30.760
<v Speaker 1>propaganda through the radio waves. And so I introduce legislation

0:23:31.480 --> 0:23:34.120
<v Speaker 1>to eliminate the provisional appeal and say, look, if it's

0:23:34.160 --> 0:23:37.520
<v Speaker 1>if it's controlled by a foreign government broadcasting in a

0:23:37.560 --> 0:23:40.159
<v Speaker 1>foreign language, we're not going to be simple patsies and

0:23:40.280 --> 0:23:43.440
<v Speaker 1>let them pump propaganda into our country. And so that's

0:23:43.560 --> 0:23:47.400
<v Speaker 1>legislation I just filed this week. Right, that's actually some

0:23:47.480 --> 0:23:50.760
<v Speaker 1>concrete work that's being done it. You know, sometimes everything's

0:23:50.760 --> 0:23:53.560
<v Speaker 1>been so vague in this lockdown. Those are real steps

0:23:53.560 --> 0:23:55.879
<v Speaker 1>that are being taken, and hopefully there's more on the horizon.

0:23:56.040 --> 0:24:00.959
<v Speaker 1>This question from Magoo asks about another concrete step. Do

0:24:01.040 --> 0:24:03.760
<v Speaker 1>you think there will be another stimulus to help those

0:24:03.800 --> 0:24:07.439
<v Speaker 1>who are waiting for unemployment? I'd much rather be working

0:24:07.480 --> 0:24:10.520
<v Speaker 1>though hashtag verdict. Do you think there's another going to

0:24:10.560 --> 0:24:17.440
<v Speaker 1>be another infusion of cash and people's bank accounts? Maybe? So.

0:24:17.520 --> 0:24:21.320
<v Speaker 1>We've passed a total of four different bills in response

0:24:21.400 --> 0:24:26.760
<v Speaker 1>to this major bills in response to this crisis. They

0:24:26.760 --> 0:24:30.560
<v Speaker 1>were numbered Bill one, Bill two, Bill three, and then

0:24:30.640 --> 0:24:33.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of Bill three point five that was supplementing the

0:24:33.480 --> 0:24:38.199
<v Speaker 1>paycheck Protection Plan. The big one was Bill three, the

0:24:38.240 --> 0:24:41.800
<v Speaker 1>Cares Act. All told, all four of those bills have

0:24:41.920 --> 0:24:44.920
<v Speaker 1>been nearly three trillion dollars, a whole lot of money. Well,

0:24:46.640 --> 0:24:49.600
<v Speaker 1>we're now back in session. The Senator is back in session.

0:24:49.640 --> 0:24:51.480
<v Speaker 1>We were back this week. I was in DC all

0:24:51.480 --> 0:24:56.359
<v Speaker 1>week and it is being vigorously debated what Congress should

0:24:56.359 --> 0:24:59.200
<v Speaker 1>do next. And I got to say, they're wildly different views.

0:24:59.359 --> 0:25:02.280
<v Speaker 1>So the Democra crats want to spend trillions more, and

0:25:02.920 --> 0:25:05.960
<v Speaker 1>they've got a couple of things they're pushing to do. One,

0:25:06.119 --> 0:25:08.600
<v Speaker 1>they're trying to do their whole partisan wish list that

0:25:08.640 --> 0:25:10.879
<v Speaker 1>they tried to do on all the past legislation, things

0:25:10.920 --> 0:25:15.040
<v Speaker 1>like codifying the Green New Deal, things like um like

0:25:15.160 --> 0:25:20.359
<v Speaker 1>changing election standards nationally to benefit Democrats at the polls.

0:25:20.400 --> 0:25:24.119
<v Speaker 1>They're pushing that hard. But their biggest priority seems to

0:25:24.160 --> 0:25:28.640
<v Speaker 1>be bailouts for big blue states that have huge pension

0:25:28.760 --> 0:25:32.919
<v Speaker 1>liabilities that long preceded this crisis. Have nothing to do

0:25:32.960 --> 0:25:36.400
<v Speaker 1>with coronavirus, but but the Democrats want to use that

0:25:36.480 --> 0:25:40.760
<v Speaker 1>to bail the states out. Anyway, what I've been arguing,

0:25:40.760 --> 0:25:42.600
<v Speaker 1>and what a fair number of Republicans have been saying,

0:25:42.640 --> 0:25:46.480
<v Speaker 1>is slow down here. We've spent three trillion dollars. And

0:25:46.520 --> 0:25:48.800
<v Speaker 1>by the way, it's not like the money sitting there

0:25:48.800 --> 0:25:52.040
<v Speaker 1>an evolved. We're just borrowing it, right, We're borrowing it

0:25:52.119 --> 0:25:54.760
<v Speaker 1>and racking up the credit card. We're not going to

0:25:54.840 --> 0:25:58.199
<v Speaker 1>get out of this crisis through debt. We're not going

0:25:58.200 --> 0:26:00.560
<v Speaker 1>to get out through borrowing. The only way to get

0:26:00.560 --> 0:26:02.720
<v Speaker 1>out it's to restart the economy, and to do so,

0:26:02.800 --> 0:26:05.640
<v Speaker 1>I think the next bill should be a recovery bill.

0:26:05.680 --> 0:26:09.840
<v Speaker 1>It should focus on tax reform and regulatory reform. As

0:26:09.880 --> 0:26:14.280
<v Speaker 1>small businesses are starting to open up, small businesses like

0:26:14.359 --> 0:26:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Cherry Loo hair salon, we ought to be lessening the

0:26:17.880 --> 0:26:21.320
<v Speaker 1>tax burden, the regulatory burden, making it easier for those

0:26:21.359 --> 0:26:25.399
<v Speaker 1>businesses to survive and thrive. That's the only thing powerful

0:26:25.520 --> 0:26:30.160
<v Speaker 1>enough to actually turn this around. We can't borrow enough

0:26:30.200 --> 0:26:32.560
<v Speaker 1>money in Washington and spend enough money to get there,

0:26:32.960 --> 0:26:36.400
<v Speaker 1>and so at this point, I think it's very much

0:26:36.400 --> 0:26:39.359
<v Speaker 1>in flux what Congress will do. But this debate is

0:26:39.480 --> 0:26:42.680
<v Speaker 1>live and raging right now. Well, especially because the country

0:26:42.720 --> 0:26:45.800
<v Speaker 1>that we most often borrow from happens to be China.

0:26:46.040 --> 0:26:49.200
<v Speaker 1>And one of the consequences of this pandemic is we're

0:26:49.240 --> 0:26:51.520
<v Speaker 1>now trying to decouple ourselves a little bit from China.

0:26:51.720 --> 0:26:54.080
<v Speaker 1>You can't do that if you keep taking all of

0:26:54.119 --> 0:26:55.600
<v Speaker 1>their money, you know. I also want to take a

0:26:55.840 --> 0:26:58.320
<v Speaker 1>moment just to thank all of the listeners. I just

0:26:58.359 --> 0:27:01.480
<v Speaker 1>saw this number come across the screen. We have now

0:27:01.560 --> 0:27:06.240
<v Speaker 1>had five million, more than five million audio downloads alone,

0:27:06.320 --> 0:27:09.280
<v Speaker 1>just the audio from the podcast. I don't think Senator

0:27:09.400 --> 0:27:11.800
<v Speaker 1>I felt confident going in, but I didn't feel that confident.

0:27:11.840 --> 0:27:14.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't think either of us thought that the show

0:27:14.080 --> 0:27:17.440
<v Speaker 1>would would go that big and be listened to by

0:27:17.440 --> 0:27:19.239
<v Speaker 1>that many people. So thank you so much. You can

0:27:19.240 --> 0:27:23.080
<v Speaker 1>always subscribe at Apple Podcasts or Google Play or Stitcher

0:27:23.480 --> 0:27:25.160
<v Speaker 1>or I don't If you ask us nicely, we'll send

0:27:25.200 --> 0:27:27.920
<v Speaker 1>an audio casset with a carrier pigeon to your house,

0:27:27.960 --> 0:27:30.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, get it anywhere on the internet, and please

0:27:30.840 --> 0:27:34.800
<v Speaker 1>send your questions in with hashtag verdict. This question comes

0:27:34.840 --> 0:27:38.800
<v Speaker 1>in from Mahi. Is that like the Hawaiian fish? I

0:27:38.800 --> 0:27:41.840
<v Speaker 1>don't know. How do you feel about Andrew Cuomo's handling

0:27:41.880 --> 0:27:44.679
<v Speaker 1>of the situation. It seems to me like other states

0:27:45.240 --> 0:27:48.480
<v Speaker 1>suffered as a result of Cuomo's into Blasio's handling, And

0:27:48.600 --> 0:27:54.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm from the Bronx by the way, Look, I don't

0:27:54.080 --> 0:27:57.880
<v Speaker 1>know Cuomo personally. I do think New York has had

0:27:57.920 --> 0:28:01.359
<v Speaker 1>a incredibly hard run of it. What's happening in New

0:28:01.440 --> 0:28:06.920
<v Speaker 1>York City is horrific. I think Cuomo has been markedly

0:28:06.960 --> 0:28:09.920
<v Speaker 1>better than Deblasio. That's not a very high bar. But

0:28:10.119 --> 0:28:14.600
<v Speaker 1>de Blasio has been so overeager, so willing to put

0:28:14.600 --> 0:28:21.240
<v Speaker 1>the jack boot on, that has really been dismaying. I've

0:28:21.240 --> 0:28:24.840
<v Speaker 1>seen a fair amount written about Cuomo's decision to send

0:28:24.840 --> 0:28:28.160
<v Speaker 1>people to nursing homes and to force nursing homes to

0:28:28.160 --> 0:28:32.960
<v Speaker 1>take people with coronavirus. And obviously many of the deaths

0:28:32.960 --> 0:28:39.720
<v Speaker 1>that have occurred nationally have occurred in nursing homes. More

0:28:39.760 --> 0:28:42.080
<v Speaker 1>than half of the deaths in the US from COVID

0:28:42.160 --> 0:28:44.520
<v Speaker 1>nineteen have occurred in New York and New Jersey, and

0:28:44.560 --> 0:28:47.239
<v Speaker 1>so that that really is the locus of that, and

0:28:47.320 --> 0:28:52.720
<v Speaker 1>it's horrific. I don't want to throw rocks at Cuomo

0:28:52.880 --> 0:28:55.600
<v Speaker 1>in the midst of a crisis like this. I do

0:28:55.680 --> 0:28:58.640
<v Speaker 1>think there will be serious questions asked, especially about the

0:28:58.720 --> 0:29:04.640
<v Speaker 1>nursing home issue. But in a time of crisis, we

0:29:04.680 --> 0:29:09.920
<v Speaker 1>ought to be coming together and solving the public health

0:29:09.960 --> 0:29:14.560
<v Speaker 1>crisis and also solving the economic catastrophe that has come

0:29:14.640 --> 0:29:16.520
<v Speaker 1>hand in hand with that. Yeah, I agree. I think

0:29:16.560 --> 0:29:19.360
<v Speaker 1>that's probably a good impulse to try to bring people together.

0:29:19.400 --> 0:29:21.440
<v Speaker 1>I just think a lot of people it's not even

0:29:21.440 --> 0:29:24.600
<v Speaker 1>that they're upset with Andrew Cuomo specifically, it's that they're

0:29:24.680 --> 0:29:28.400
<v Speaker 1>upset at the double standard, the hypocrisy. You know, Andrew Cuomo,

0:29:28.480 --> 0:29:30.800
<v Speaker 1>who maybe he did an okay job, maybe he didn't.

0:29:30.800 --> 0:29:33.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. There's some evidence that he didn't. He's

0:29:33.160 --> 0:29:36.120
<v Speaker 1>being hailed as the great hero of coronavirus, and yet

0:29:36.120 --> 0:29:38.960
<v Speaker 1>other governors or the president who have done at least

0:29:39.000 --> 0:29:41.800
<v Speaker 1>as good a job as Cuomo did are being pilloried for,

0:29:41.880 --> 0:29:43.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, just destroying the whole country. It's it's that

0:29:44.000 --> 0:29:49.240
<v Speaker 1>double standard. I think it's very difficult for people to swallow. Well, listen,

0:29:49.280 --> 0:29:52.520
<v Speaker 1>I think one of the biggest shifts in the age

0:29:52.520 --> 0:29:57.080
<v Speaker 1>of Trump is the utter fraud of the media has

0:29:57.080 --> 0:30:02.000
<v Speaker 1>been exposed. Yeah, you remember three, three or four years ago,

0:30:02.080 --> 0:30:05.640
<v Speaker 1>people used to argue, oh, the media isn't biased, and

0:30:05.760 --> 0:30:13.280
<v Speaker 1>somebody argues that even lefties you can't watch the media.

0:30:14.000 --> 0:30:19.440
<v Speaker 1>They hate Trump so much. I mean Trump derangement syndrome.

0:30:19.440 --> 0:30:21.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean they twitch and foam at the mouth and

0:30:21.800 --> 0:30:24.840
<v Speaker 1>anything he does. Look, there are things that Trump does

0:30:24.880 --> 0:30:26.600
<v Speaker 1>that I wish he didn't do. The things he says

0:30:26.760 --> 0:30:30.120
<v Speaker 1>I wish you didn't say. But when the media is

0:30:30.200 --> 0:30:33.360
<v Speaker 1>just the only thing they can do is scream orange

0:30:33.360 --> 0:30:37.840
<v Speaker 1>man bad, Orange man bad, it starts to get ludicrous.

0:30:37.920 --> 0:30:43.720
<v Speaker 1>And when the media is just a willing shill for

0:30:43.920 --> 0:30:51.360
<v Speaker 1>Chinese communist propaganda, so I it pisses me off every

0:30:51.360 --> 0:30:54.120
<v Speaker 1>time I see the media saying, oh, so and so

0:30:54.280 --> 0:30:57.760
<v Speaker 1>country has has has a worst case of coronavirus than China.

0:30:57.960 --> 0:30:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Well that's only because they're doctoring their numbers of the

0:31:00.080 --> 0:31:02.960
<v Speaker 1>lying to us. And the story that was the most

0:31:03.040 --> 0:31:07.840
<v Speaker 1>ridiculous was was CNN did a story so the Chinese government,

0:31:07.880 --> 0:31:11.920
<v Speaker 1>their military propaganda site put out a story that says

0:31:12.240 --> 0:31:16.440
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese military is dealing with coronavirus much better than

0:31:16.480 --> 0:31:22.160
<v Speaker 1>the American military. And CNN wrote a whole story saying

0:31:22.200 --> 0:31:24.480
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese military is doing a better job than the

0:31:24.480 --> 0:31:29.760
<v Speaker 1>American military with coronavirus. Source the government website from the

0:31:29.840 --> 0:31:34.360
<v Speaker 1>Chinese Communist government, and it was literally they're repeating Chinese

0:31:34.400 --> 0:31:41.640
<v Speaker 1>communist propaganda and it so of course the media bestill

0:31:41.840 --> 0:31:46.560
<v Speaker 1>my beating heart. These democratic governors are wonderful, and every

0:31:46.720 --> 0:31:51.680
<v Speaker 1>Republican governor, the president, you know, apparently they were all

0:31:51.720 --> 0:31:54.920
<v Speaker 1>in the wet market in Wuhan, and Donald Trump is

0:31:54.960 --> 0:31:58.520
<v Speaker 1>personally responsible for this virus, as the media tells. Look,

0:31:58.520 --> 0:32:02.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's it's the double standard and hypocrisy is

0:32:02.280 --> 0:32:04.640
<v Speaker 1>a little ridiculous. Sure, and I think you're probably right.

0:32:04.680 --> 0:32:06.680
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of people are tuning them out.

0:32:06.960 --> 0:32:09.560
<v Speaker 1>This from Cheyenne the Wolf, who I think as a person,

0:32:09.600 --> 0:32:12.160
<v Speaker 1>but that's the Twitter name. How do we get the

0:32:12.240 --> 0:32:16.520
<v Speaker 1>churches open again? I think that frankly, from my perspective,

0:32:16.520 --> 0:32:18.120
<v Speaker 1>that's the question on top of my mind. I think

0:32:18.160 --> 0:32:22.240
<v Speaker 1>that's true for a lot of people. So I did

0:32:24.960 --> 0:32:27.920
<v Speaker 1>last weekend. I went and did an interview, did a

0:32:27.960 --> 0:32:30.760
<v Speaker 1>podcast with my pastor. And I actually feel kind of bad, Michael.

0:32:30.760 --> 0:32:33.040
<v Speaker 1>I feel like I'm confessing infidelity to you. Yeah, what

0:32:33.120 --> 0:32:38.560
<v Speaker 1>the heckcast I you know, so I hadn't admitted that

0:32:38.600 --> 0:32:41.120
<v Speaker 1>to you that But anyway, the pastor said, come to

0:32:41.120 --> 0:32:44.280
<v Speaker 1>the church, and we did. We did, Uh said, it's

0:32:44.320 --> 0:32:46.800
<v Speaker 1>probably forty five minutes an hour. We talked back and forth,

0:32:46.840 --> 0:32:50.200
<v Speaker 1>and you know, it's interesting in our church. What the

0:32:50.240 --> 0:32:52.160
<v Speaker 1>pastor did. He sent out an email to all the

0:32:52.200 --> 0:32:54.680
<v Speaker 1>members and said, what do you think where what's the

0:32:54.800 --> 0:33:02.560
<v Speaker 1>right balance of when are you comfortable coming back? Look,

0:33:03.000 --> 0:33:09.240
<v Speaker 1>we've seen I think it will vary geographically. It needs

0:33:09.280 --> 0:33:13.000
<v Speaker 1>to be based on sound science and medicine. So, for example,

0:33:13.040 --> 0:33:17.320
<v Speaker 1>New York City, the infection rate and the fatalities there

0:33:17.120 --> 0:33:20.880
<v Speaker 1>are are horrific, and I think it makes sense for

0:33:21.000 --> 0:33:24.560
<v Speaker 1>people to be have much more rigorous standards trying to

0:33:24.640 --> 0:33:27.160
<v Speaker 1>enforce social distancing in New York City right now. There

0:33:27.160 --> 0:33:29.680
<v Speaker 1>are other parts of the country with the numbers are

0:33:30.160 --> 0:33:35.239
<v Speaker 1>much less. We've seen local officials abusing their power. So

0:33:35.360 --> 0:33:39.640
<v Speaker 1>Tennessee and Mississippi, both instances you had people that are

0:33:39.640 --> 0:33:43.120
<v Speaker 1>actually Kentucky and Mississippi. Both instances you had people who

0:33:44.960 --> 0:33:47.960
<v Speaker 1>went to church, went to church in their cars, were

0:33:48.040 --> 0:33:50.160
<v Speaker 1>listening to the pastor over the radio, so they didn't

0:33:50.160 --> 0:33:51.800
<v Speaker 1>get out of their cars. They were all parked together

0:33:51.840 --> 0:33:54.640
<v Speaker 1>in the parking lot listening to the service over the radio.

0:33:54.720 --> 0:33:57.400
<v Speaker 1>But they wanted to be parked together, and and and

0:33:58.160 --> 0:34:00.680
<v Speaker 1>the politicians sent in police to ticke at them all.

0:34:01.400 --> 0:34:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Now that's just absurd, that's just abusive. But let me

0:34:05.960 --> 0:34:14.360
<v Speaker 1>give a different encouragement, which is the church is not

0:34:14.440 --> 0:34:18.560
<v Speaker 1>a building. The church is not bricks or mortis one

0:34:18.560 --> 0:34:20.880
<v Speaker 1>of the things when I did the podcast with my

0:34:20.880 --> 0:34:23.080
<v Speaker 1>pastor last week, I was saying, look, this is an

0:34:23.080 --> 0:34:25.680
<v Speaker 1>opportunity for the church, an opportunity for the church to

0:34:26.160 --> 0:34:37.120
<v Speaker 1>show show the love of Jesus, show to show care

0:34:37.200 --> 0:34:41.279
<v Speaker 1>and concern and to help others, to help you know,

0:34:41.960 --> 0:34:45.480
<v Speaker 1>elderly people who are alone, who are isolated, they need love,

0:34:45.600 --> 0:34:48.160
<v Speaker 1>they need people to reach out to them. Maybe not physically,

0:34:48.520 --> 0:34:51.120
<v Speaker 1>but they need to not feel alone and scared. There's

0:34:51.160 --> 0:34:55.879
<v Speaker 1>so many people who are understandably scared of their own mortality,

0:34:56.440 --> 0:35:02.839
<v Speaker 1>and this is an opportunity for the church, I think,

0:35:03.000 --> 0:35:06.520
<v Speaker 1>not to worry about the physical building, but to worry

0:35:06.560 --> 0:35:10.080
<v Speaker 1>about the community we're in and to be the church,

0:35:10.160 --> 0:35:12.800
<v Speaker 1>to be the body of Christ and show that love

0:35:15.280 --> 0:35:20.759
<v Speaker 1>that I think is is much much more important than

0:35:23.040 --> 0:35:26.000
<v Speaker 1>the exact date and time we're able to gather in

0:35:26.080 --> 0:35:28.719
<v Speaker 1>large groups. Again, sure that's true, and that date and

0:35:28.760 --> 0:35:31.200
<v Speaker 1>time will be different, you know, as you say, for

0:35:31.360 --> 0:35:34.520
<v Speaker 1>different places, and as it should be. Maybe if if

0:35:34.520 --> 0:35:36.399
<v Speaker 1>we could all take a little note of federalism out

0:35:36.400 --> 0:35:38.319
<v Speaker 1>of this pandemic, that wouldn't be the worst thing in

0:35:38.320 --> 0:35:42.160
<v Speaker 1>the world. Absolutely from the seer, this might be the

0:35:42.200 --> 0:35:46.040
<v Speaker 1>most important question yet, what number guard do you use

0:35:46.520 --> 0:35:48.680
<v Speaker 1>for your beard? I assume that question is to you,

0:35:48.800 --> 0:35:54.760
<v Speaker 1>not to me. I don't know, is the short answer.

0:35:54.840 --> 0:35:57.640
<v Speaker 1>So I bought this this beard tremor right. So I

0:35:57.680 --> 0:36:03.279
<v Speaker 1>first grew the beard Thanksgiving, not last Thanksgiving, but Thanksgiving before,

0:36:03.280 --> 0:36:05.680
<v Speaker 1>and I just went on Thanksgiving break and I usually

0:36:05.719 --> 0:36:09.520
<v Speaker 1>on holiday don't shave, and at the end of vacation

0:36:09.560 --> 0:36:13.120
<v Speaker 1>I usually shave and I just came back and decide,

0:36:13.120 --> 0:36:15.080
<v Speaker 1>all right, what the heck I'm not going to And

0:36:15.400 --> 0:36:19.200
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to say it was some profound statement or

0:36:19.200 --> 0:36:21.000
<v Speaker 1>and it was just kind of a hadn't grown a

0:36:21.080 --> 0:36:22.920
<v Speaker 1>beard since law school, and I figured, all right, this

0:36:22.920 --> 0:36:31.080
<v Speaker 1>would be fun. And I gotta say. My campaign manager

0:36:31.640 --> 0:36:35.239
<v Speaker 1>sends me this email when he sees this picture of

0:36:35.280 --> 0:36:38.120
<v Speaker 1>me circulating around with sort of the whispy beginnings of

0:36:38.120 --> 0:36:44.040
<v Speaker 1>a beard, and he's just like, worst decision. Really. He

0:36:44.600 --> 0:36:49.239
<v Speaker 1>was anti beard, hard anti beard, and so I kind

0:36:49.239 --> 0:36:54.200
<v Speaker 1>of taunted him and we I am not surrounded by

0:36:54.280 --> 0:36:58.680
<v Speaker 1>yes man, let me say that it is. It is.

0:36:58.719 --> 0:37:02.160
<v Speaker 1>We all hold our own well. So the beard started

0:37:02.200 --> 0:37:07.000
<v Speaker 1>growing in and then it started getting fairly unruly, and

0:37:07.600 --> 0:37:11.480
<v Speaker 1>I was doing some some press interview. It was a

0:37:11.600 --> 0:37:14.799
<v Speaker 1>Sunday show at my house, and like like, the team

0:37:14.840 --> 0:37:17.640
<v Speaker 1>started getting upset that the beard was a little too

0:37:17.719 --> 0:37:22.439
<v Speaker 1>duck dynasty for their taste, and so they they asked

0:37:22.480 --> 0:37:24.600
<v Speaker 1>a young guy to run over to the house and

0:37:24.760 --> 0:37:27.400
<v Speaker 1>buy a beard trimmer and be like, here, trimmed that

0:37:27.480 --> 0:37:31.239
<v Speaker 1>damn thing. And I'd never trimmed a beard. I'm like,

0:37:31.400 --> 0:37:34.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, So I just I got a beard trimmer,

0:37:34.000 --> 0:37:36.439
<v Speaker 1>And they have different clips that you clip on the thing,

0:37:36.840 --> 0:37:39.880
<v Speaker 1>and so I just clipped on whatever the biggest one is,

0:37:39.920 --> 0:37:43.319
<v Speaker 1>So the long ish whatever the longest clip is that

0:37:43.360 --> 0:37:45.560
<v Speaker 1>fits on the beard trimmer, that's the one I used

0:37:45.600 --> 0:37:50.520
<v Speaker 1>and cut it down some. And you know, I'm imagining

0:37:50.560 --> 0:37:53.040
<v Speaker 1>so so I don't know what number is the short age.

0:37:53.080 --> 0:37:55.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm imagining if you hadn't trimmed it by now, you'd

0:37:55.440 --> 0:37:58.560
<v Speaker 1>you'd look like one of those Russian Orthodox priests. And

0:37:58.600 --> 0:38:01.160
<v Speaker 1>then some crook at the FBI might accuse you of

0:38:01.160 --> 0:38:02.920
<v Speaker 1>colluding or something. I don't know. I mean, I think

0:38:02.960 --> 0:38:05.280
<v Speaker 1>it's probably lucky that you were able to trim that beard.

0:38:06.360 --> 0:38:09.520
<v Speaker 1>So I've I ever told you. A good friend of

0:38:09.520 --> 0:38:13.200
<v Speaker 1>mine who was used to be on my senate staff,

0:38:13.520 --> 0:38:16.080
<v Speaker 1>um he had right about when I grew the beard.

0:38:16.120 --> 0:38:20.920
<v Speaker 1>He had left and was living in Jerusalem, and was

0:38:20.920 --> 0:38:24.040
<v Speaker 1>was it was it yeshiva yea? And he sent me

0:38:24.080 --> 0:38:26.520
<v Speaker 1>an email he said a friend of his was a

0:38:26.640 --> 0:38:30.399
<v Speaker 1>rabbi who had seen a picture of the beard. He said,

0:38:30.480 --> 0:38:35.120
<v Speaker 1>the beard has a Rabbinical and Talmudic look to it

0:38:36.680 --> 0:38:40.560
<v Speaker 1>that will bring peace to the Middle East and put

0:38:40.600 --> 0:38:45.279
<v Speaker 1>the fear of God in the enemies of Israel I

0:38:45.600 --> 0:38:47.880
<v Speaker 1>like cracked up. There's a real email, And so I

0:38:47.920 --> 0:38:50.480
<v Speaker 1>actually literally cut and pasted it and I tweeted it out.

0:38:50.560 --> 0:38:53.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, Okay, this may be a bit much. I'm

0:38:53.080 --> 0:38:56.520
<v Speaker 1>not sure about I'm glad you're like the beard, but

0:38:56.640 --> 0:38:59.160
<v Speaker 1>but it did at least make me laugh. Wow, that's great.

0:38:59.200 --> 0:39:01.320
<v Speaker 1>I would probably at that line in my Twitter bio.

0:39:01.520 --> 0:39:06.280
<v Speaker 1>That's a very very good feedback. Nevertheless, from John James.

0:39:06.880 --> 0:39:10.360
<v Speaker 1>With thirty trillion dollars in debt, two hundred trillion dollars

0:39:10.360 --> 0:39:13.799
<v Speaker 1>in obligations, and one hundred trillion dollars in state debts,

0:39:13.880 --> 0:39:17.360
<v Speaker 1>how will we ever get our finances in order when

0:39:17.400 --> 0:39:20.520
<v Speaker 1>the GOP as well as the Democrats keep kicking the

0:39:20.600 --> 0:39:24.160
<v Speaker 1>can down the road. Look at it. It is a

0:39:24.239 --> 0:39:27.719
<v Speaker 1>massive problem. It was a massive problem three months ago,

0:39:27.920 --> 0:39:33.760
<v Speaker 1>and now it's even worse. We've spent three trillion dollars

0:39:33.760 --> 0:39:38.000
<v Speaker 1>in just a couple of months. And the problem is

0:39:38.000 --> 0:39:42.840
<v Speaker 1>it's a bipartisan problem in the Senate. For in ordinary times,

0:39:42.880 --> 0:39:47.319
<v Speaker 1>for any trillion dollars spending bill, you get all the Democrats,

0:39:47.320 --> 0:39:49.799
<v Speaker 1>and you get half to two thirds of the Republicans.

0:39:50.440 --> 0:39:54.239
<v Speaker 1>There maybe twenty of us that try to hold a

0:39:54.280 --> 0:39:56.640
<v Speaker 1>lot and try to push back, but but those votes

0:39:56.680 --> 0:40:02.799
<v Speaker 1>are usually about eighty twenty. The only way you will

0:40:02.840 --> 0:40:08.720
<v Speaker 1>get that is with presidential leadership. And there are areas

0:40:08.760 --> 0:40:12.439
<v Speaker 1>where the president has been vigorous and aggressive. He didn't

0:40:12.520 --> 0:40:16.160
<v Speaker 1>run in twenty sixteen promising to cut spending. He didn't

0:40:16.239 --> 0:40:21.920
<v Speaker 1>run campaigning against debt, and so when the president is

0:40:21.960 --> 0:40:24.200
<v Speaker 1>supporting it, that makes it easy for a whole bunch

0:40:24.200 --> 0:40:26.560
<v Speaker 1>of Republicans to support it, and all the Democrats always

0:40:26.560 --> 0:40:30.960
<v Speaker 1>support spending. The answer in terms of how we turn

0:40:31.000 --> 0:40:33.920
<v Speaker 1>it around, I'd say a couple of things. One you

0:40:33.960 --> 0:40:36.560
<v Speaker 1>need presidential leadership that's willing to take it on. But two,

0:40:36.600 --> 0:40:39.439
<v Speaker 1>you've got to have economic growth. So if you look

0:40:39.480 --> 0:40:43.719
<v Speaker 1>at the numbers, you look at all the variables that

0:40:43.800 --> 0:40:48.400
<v Speaker 1>go into our federal budget, there is only one first

0:40:48.560 --> 0:40:51.880
<v Speaker 1>order variable, which is there's only one variable that has

0:40:51.920 --> 0:40:56.240
<v Speaker 1>just just a dramatic impact, and it is economic growth.

0:40:57.640 --> 0:41:01.440
<v Speaker 1>If we're at anemic level of growth, if we're at

0:41:01.719 --> 0:41:03.839
<v Speaker 1>one and two percent growth, which is what we had

0:41:03.920 --> 0:41:08.400
<v Speaker 1>for the Obama administration for eight years, with anemic growth,

0:41:08.480 --> 0:41:14.399
<v Speaker 1>you can't solve this problem with robust growth, three four

0:41:14.600 --> 0:41:18.640
<v Speaker 1>five percent growth. The debt becomes much easier to solve.

0:41:18.680 --> 0:41:22.880
<v Speaker 1>If you look at the last time the federal deficit

0:41:22.920 --> 0:41:25.560
<v Speaker 1>went to zero and we actually had a surplus. It

0:41:25.640 --> 0:41:28.920
<v Speaker 1>was after twelve years of Reagan Bush. It was after

0:41:28.960 --> 0:41:32.680
<v Speaker 1>twelve years of cutting taxes, reducing regulations, and the economic

0:41:32.719 --> 0:41:35.160
<v Speaker 1>growth was such that when it got to Bill Clinton,

0:41:35.239 --> 0:41:39.800
<v Speaker 1>Bill Clinton inherited a four trillion dollars surplus that wasn't

0:41:39.840 --> 0:41:44.440
<v Speaker 1>that long ago. And it was the incredible economic growth

0:41:44.840 --> 0:41:48.479
<v Speaker 1>that came from tax reform and reg reform. A little

0:41:48.480 --> 0:41:51.840
<v Speaker 1>bit of a Johnny one note, growth, growth, growth, and

0:41:51.960 --> 0:41:54.600
<v Speaker 1>you get it from tax reform and reg reform. Now

0:41:55.960 --> 0:42:00.879
<v Speaker 1>we're in we're in a situation economic this country hasn't

0:42:00.880 --> 0:42:06.080
<v Speaker 1>seen since the Great Depression. It's frightening is this is

0:42:07.400 --> 0:42:10.080
<v Speaker 1>thirty three million Americans have lost their job in two months.

0:42:10.360 --> 0:42:14.919
<v Speaker 1>We had we had strong growth until three months ago. Yeah,

0:42:16.120 --> 0:42:18.359
<v Speaker 1>we've got to turn it around. I will say as

0:42:18.400 --> 0:42:23.719
<v Speaker 1>we start shifting the conversation into a growth conversation. Look,

0:42:23.719 --> 0:42:27.160
<v Speaker 1>when you're shoveling cash out the door by the trillions,

0:42:28.280 --> 0:42:34.319
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of naturally the democrats playing field. If you're

0:42:34.360 --> 0:42:37.839
<v Speaker 1>a status if you're a socialist, shoveling cash, you'd love

0:42:37.960 --> 0:42:42.080
<v Speaker 1>to do if we start shifting into the recovery debate,

0:42:42.120 --> 0:42:44.080
<v Speaker 1>which is where I think we should be. How do

0:42:44.160 --> 0:42:47.080
<v Speaker 1>we bring growth back? How do we bring those jobs back?

0:42:47.600 --> 0:42:51.120
<v Speaker 1>That then is a conservative or a libertarian's battlefield where

0:42:51.160 --> 0:42:53.279
<v Speaker 1>the only way to do it is tax reform and

0:42:53.320 --> 0:42:56.200
<v Speaker 1>reag reform. And so if we can get growth up,

0:42:57.719 --> 0:43:03.279
<v Speaker 1>and for someone who says, well it seems hopeless, I mean,

0:43:03.320 --> 0:43:05.960
<v Speaker 1>things are so bad as is it? Just are we doomed?

0:43:08.040 --> 0:43:13.640
<v Speaker 1>From World War Two to the present, GDP growth has

0:43:13.680 --> 0:43:18.279
<v Speaker 1>averaged about three point three percent a year from two

0:43:18.320 --> 0:43:20.960
<v Speaker 1>thousand and eight to twenty twelve. Under Barack Obama it

0:43:21.080 --> 0:43:23.879
<v Speaker 1>averaged zero point nine percent a year, less than one

0:43:23.920 --> 0:43:28.920
<v Speaker 1>percent over four years. The last four year period before

0:43:29.000 --> 0:43:33.160
<v Speaker 1>that we're GDP growth average less than one percent was

0:43:33.200 --> 0:43:35.240
<v Speaker 1>seventy eight to eighty two. Is coming out of Jimmy

0:43:35.239 --> 0:43:39.920
<v Speaker 1>Carter YEP. And what happened then? What happened then, and

0:43:40.040 --> 0:43:42.080
<v Speaker 1>by the way, what produced it in both instances was

0:43:42.120 --> 0:43:46.160
<v Speaker 1>high taxes, high regulation, strangly small businesses, and growth becomes anemic.

0:43:46.840 --> 0:43:50.839
<v Speaker 1>Now Reagan comes in in eighty one, cuts taxes, simplifies

0:43:50.880 --> 0:43:55.640
<v Speaker 1>the tax code, repeals job killing regulations. We go from

0:43:56.360 --> 0:44:00.120
<v Speaker 1>four years of GDP growth less than one percent. Do

0:44:00.120 --> 0:44:02.839
<v Speaker 1>you know what GDP growth was in nineteen eighty four?

0:44:03.800 --> 0:44:12.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't remember. Seven point two percent. Man, those are

0:44:12.840 --> 0:44:17.160
<v Speaker 1>crazy numbers, and we did that. That's what fueled the

0:44:17.280 --> 0:44:21.879
<v Speaker 1>incredible growth. By the way, JFK. JFK campaigned on five

0:44:21.920 --> 0:44:25.400
<v Speaker 1>percent GDP growth and then he cut taxes and repealed regulations,

0:44:25.400 --> 0:44:28.319
<v Speaker 1>and we got five percent GDP growth. You want to

0:44:28.320 --> 0:44:30.960
<v Speaker 1>turn the debt around, the only thing strong enough to

0:44:31.040 --> 0:44:34.040
<v Speaker 1>do it is the incredible engine of the American free

0:44:34.120 --> 0:44:37.360
<v Speaker 1>enterprise system and its growth. Growth. Growth has got to

0:44:37.400 --> 0:44:39.480
<v Speaker 1>be our fun right, and we're not going to be

0:44:39.520 --> 0:44:41.520
<v Speaker 1>able to get there if we're a lockdown for two years.

0:44:41.520 --> 0:44:44.200
<v Speaker 1>So I think that's another reason to be eager to

0:44:44.280 --> 0:44:48.239
<v Speaker 1>start to lift some of these lockdowns from Joe. Joe

0:44:48.280 --> 0:44:52.360
<v Speaker 1>wants to know do you think central banks issuing digital

0:44:52.400 --> 0:44:56.600
<v Speaker 1>cryptocurrency will lead to the government keeping us from buying

0:44:56.640 --> 0:45:02.959
<v Speaker 1>and selling? It's a question. I know absolutely nothing about it. Yeah,

0:45:03.000 --> 0:45:07.279
<v Speaker 1>I gotta admit I don't know much about that question either. Look,

0:45:07.320 --> 0:45:11.360
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to the FED, I am nervous about

0:45:11.400 --> 0:45:14.839
<v Speaker 1>the FED. I'm nervous about unchecked power I've long been

0:45:15.320 --> 0:45:18.319
<v Speaker 1>a co sponsor of audit the FED legislation. I think

0:45:18.360 --> 0:45:24.880
<v Speaker 1>we need to audit the FED. Right now, the FED

0:45:25.040 --> 0:45:28.440
<v Speaker 1>is doing a lot to provide liquidity to all sorts

0:45:28.440 --> 0:45:32.240
<v Speaker 1>of players in the economy. I'm glad if that helps

0:45:32.280 --> 0:45:35.719
<v Speaker 1>our helps our economy make it through this. But I

0:45:35.760 --> 0:45:39.040
<v Speaker 1>suspect they're going to be some ugly components there that

0:45:39.080 --> 0:45:49.080
<v Speaker 1>will come out later. And so the cryptocurrency world, you know, bitcoin,

0:45:50.120 --> 0:45:52.280
<v Speaker 1>I have to admit, I like, I have some friends

0:45:52.320 --> 0:45:55.319
<v Speaker 1>that have gotten into the bitcoin world, and I'm all,

0:45:55.360 --> 0:45:59.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm quite libertarian, so I'm like, great, knock yourself out.

0:46:00.000 --> 0:46:01.560
<v Speaker 1>A couple who are like, hey, you know, you ought

0:46:01.560 --> 0:46:05.200
<v Speaker 1>to put a thousand dollars into this, and I don't

0:46:05.400 --> 0:46:10.080
<v Speaker 1>entirely understand it. Yeah, Like I just they've tried to

0:46:10.120 --> 0:46:13.000
<v Speaker 1>explain it to me, and I'm like, okay, I'm not sure.

0:46:13.080 --> 0:46:15.319
<v Speaker 1>And so I don't, like, I don't have that much

0:46:15.360 --> 0:46:17.399
<v Speaker 1>money to invest to begin with, but but I don't

0:46:17.440 --> 0:46:19.680
<v Speaker 1>like to put put money I have in something that

0:46:19.719 --> 0:46:22.799
<v Speaker 1>I don't don't fundamentally understand. And it seems to be

0:46:23.040 --> 0:46:25.680
<v Speaker 1>very volatile and some people it's gone way up, and

0:46:25.719 --> 0:46:28.640
<v Speaker 1>then usually things that can go way up really fast.

0:46:28.640 --> 0:46:34.840
<v Speaker 1>You can go way down really fast. So I don't know.

0:46:35.000 --> 0:46:42.320
<v Speaker 1>I will say, when it comes to policy makers regulating

0:46:42.400 --> 0:46:46.240
<v Speaker 1>things like cryptocurrency, I think most of the federal government

0:46:46.239 --> 0:46:51.040
<v Speaker 1>doesn't know what it's doing yet is not sure Yeah,

0:46:51.080 --> 0:46:53.799
<v Speaker 1>what the right answer is. I don't doubt there's some

0:46:53.840 --> 0:46:58.360
<v Speaker 1>big government folks that want to take over everything with it.

0:46:58.440 --> 0:47:05.120
<v Speaker 1>Is there a role for combating fraud and money laundering?

0:47:05.239 --> 0:47:10.359
<v Speaker 1>And sure? But I don't know, is the short sure? Well,

0:47:10.640 --> 0:47:14.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm basically with youth senator, including on the investment front.

0:47:14.200 --> 0:47:16.960
<v Speaker 1>I spoke to George Gilder, who I think he was

0:47:17.280 --> 0:47:21.040
<v Speaker 1>the most cited writer by Ronald Reagan during his entire presidency.

0:47:21.040 --> 0:47:23.759
<v Speaker 1>George Guilder, very very insightful guy, and he wrote this

0:47:23.760 --> 0:47:27.040
<v Speaker 1>whole book about how blockchain, you know, the essence of

0:47:27.400 --> 0:47:30.520
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin and cryptocurrency. Blockchain is the future of the Internet.

0:47:30.680 --> 0:47:33.680
<v Speaker 1>And I have no doubt that he's He's right, But

0:47:34.160 --> 0:47:36.759
<v Speaker 1>I don't understand it either. It certainly doesn't appear to

0:47:36.800 --> 0:47:39.600
<v Speaker 1>be happening right now. And so obviously the government is

0:47:39.600 --> 0:47:41.719
<v Speaker 1>going to weigh in on this more as it develops,

0:47:41.800 --> 0:47:46.840
<v Speaker 1>and in the meantime, there's a tendency you know the

0:47:46.880 --> 0:47:50.160
<v Speaker 1>famous story of the Emperor's new clothes, where the Emperor's

0:47:50.280 --> 0:47:55.040
<v Speaker 1>riding naked down the street because because some unscrupulous tailors

0:47:55.080 --> 0:48:00.920
<v Speaker 1>convinced him they had invisible thread, and everyone was afraid

0:48:00.960 --> 0:48:03.239
<v Speaker 1>to say, this guy's naked, he's not wearing anything. Like

0:48:03.320 --> 0:48:07.160
<v Speaker 1>groupthink can be really dangerous. And you look at like

0:48:07.320 --> 0:48:12.160
<v Speaker 1>Hollands the tulip bulbs that like there was an investment

0:48:12.239 --> 0:48:15.560
<v Speaker 1>mania where everyone wanted tulip bulbs, and so happens. I

0:48:15.640 --> 0:48:18.560
<v Speaker 1>bought Heidi some purple tulips yesterday, and I don't know

0:48:18.560 --> 0:48:21.120
<v Speaker 1>why I thought of the tulip bulbs, but they became

0:48:21.160 --> 0:48:25.239
<v Speaker 1>incredibly valuable, like like flower bulbs, Like why would you

0:48:25.320 --> 0:48:28.439
<v Speaker 1>be spending tons of money on flower bulls? I don't

0:48:28.480 --> 0:48:31.640
<v Speaker 1>get it, but it became everyone was afraid to say

0:48:31.680 --> 0:48:34.400
<v Speaker 1>the emperor has no clothes, and everyone wanted tullibubs. And

0:48:34.440 --> 0:48:36.879
<v Speaker 1>then they went way up and then they collapsed. And

0:48:36.920 --> 0:48:40.320
<v Speaker 1>I do think there are tendencies people are scared to

0:48:40.360 --> 0:48:43.840
<v Speaker 1>say they don't understand something, and that that can be

0:48:43.880 --> 0:48:47.400
<v Speaker 1>a very dangerous place to get involved. I'm still waiting

0:48:47.400 --> 0:48:49.759
<v Speaker 1>for my beanie babies to shoot right back up through

0:48:49.760 --> 0:48:52.239
<v Speaker 1>the roof I'm going to be a wealthy man when

0:48:52.280 --> 0:48:54.560
<v Speaker 1>that happens. It's probably just right around the corner. And

0:48:54.680 --> 0:48:59.440
<v Speaker 1>that in the Tulips as well. This question from Cbe.

0:49:00.480 --> 0:49:03.840
<v Speaker 1>I am a waitress. My governor's orders are a slap

0:49:03.880 --> 0:49:06.880
<v Speaker 1>in the face to me. Mister Cruz, what is the

0:49:06.920 --> 0:49:10.359
<v Speaker 1>most effective way, in your opinion, to end these restrictions.

0:49:10.640 --> 0:49:14.160
<v Speaker 1>I've heard people say called the doj the Supreme Court

0:49:14.200 --> 0:49:16.839
<v Speaker 1>refused to hear the Pennsylvania case. I'm not quite sure

0:49:16.880 --> 0:49:21.160
<v Speaker 1>what that's referring to. For people who can't work at all,

0:49:21.239 --> 0:49:23.799
<v Speaker 1>you know, like a waitress simply cannot work during this

0:49:24.440 --> 0:49:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Obviously it's much more urgent to restart the economy than

0:49:27.640 --> 0:49:30.839
<v Speaker 1>for people who can work from home. Should they write

0:49:30.840 --> 0:49:33.080
<v Speaker 1>to their congressmen? I mean, what is best for them

0:49:33.120 --> 0:49:37.560
<v Speaker 1>to do right now? So did c me say where

0:49:37.600 --> 0:49:42.640
<v Speaker 1>she was? No? Okay, Look, I mean it's it's harder

0:49:42.680 --> 0:49:45.080
<v Speaker 1>because it's varying state by state, and some of it

0:49:45.200 --> 0:49:49.680
<v Speaker 1>is depending on the facts and circumstances. If the infection

0:49:49.840 --> 0:49:54.120
<v Speaker 1>is really bad and widespread, then then the restrictions will

0:49:54.160 --> 0:49:56.839
<v Speaker 1>probably be around for a while. I think there's also

0:49:56.880 --> 0:50:00.319
<v Speaker 1>a pretty sharp difference here between Republicans and democra rats.

0:50:00.320 --> 0:50:03.480
<v Speaker 1>So if you're in she mentioned Pennsylvania. Look, if she's

0:50:03.520 --> 0:50:07.080
<v Speaker 1>in Pennsylvania, they have a democratic governor. Yeah, and you're seeing.

0:50:08.320 --> 0:50:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Part of the messed up thing about where we are

0:50:11.239 --> 0:50:17.720
<v Speaker 1>today is everything in life seems to be defined based

0:50:17.760 --> 0:50:21.640
<v Speaker 1>on what you think about Donald Trump. And it's it's weird.

0:50:22.000 --> 0:50:25.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I mean it's so so. For Democrats who

0:50:25.080 --> 0:50:31.399
<v Speaker 1>hate Trump, everything is about Trump and it's just and

0:50:31.400 --> 0:50:36.200
<v Speaker 1>and so this virus, this pandemic, it's all his fault.

0:50:36.520 --> 0:50:39.440
<v Speaker 1>And their view is everything's got to stay shut down forever.

0:50:39.640 --> 0:50:44.320
<v Speaker 1>And we're seeing democratic politicians that are saying, until there's

0:50:44.360 --> 0:50:48.560
<v Speaker 1>not one case, yeah, right, we'll just shut down everyone forever. Look,

0:50:49.520 --> 0:50:51.759
<v Speaker 1>that's a little nuney and Okay, I'm sorry you don't

0:50:51.800 --> 0:50:54.000
<v Speaker 1>like Trump, but but that's that doesn't make any it's

0:50:54.000 --> 0:50:57.400
<v Speaker 1>just impossible. Look to be fair. On the flip side,

0:50:58.400 --> 0:51:01.399
<v Speaker 1>there are folks who loved Trump who I think are

0:51:01.480 --> 0:51:05.040
<v Speaker 1>too quick to dismiss this pandemic as it's a hoax.

0:51:05.080 --> 0:51:09.319
<v Speaker 1>It's not real. This thing's real. It's dangerous. People are

0:51:09.400 --> 0:51:12.440
<v Speaker 1>dying and we need to treat it seriously. And I

0:51:12.480 --> 0:51:14.600
<v Speaker 1>gotta say where I am and where I think most

0:51:14.680 --> 0:51:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Texans are is let's use common sense, Let's treat it seriously.

0:51:20.280 --> 0:51:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Let's let's do what we can to slow and stop

0:51:24.520 --> 0:51:26.880
<v Speaker 1>the spread of the virus. But let's not at the

0:51:26.960 --> 0:51:32.719
<v Speaker 1>same time strangle small businesses and destroy people's livelihood. So Texas,

0:51:32.840 --> 0:51:36.640
<v Speaker 1>we we just rolled out. So for example, CB said

0:51:36.640 --> 0:51:41.000
<v Speaker 1>she's a waitress. We've now Texas has laid out guidelines

0:51:41.000 --> 0:51:43.480
<v Speaker 1>that has allowed restaurants to reopen. Now they're reopening at

0:51:43.480 --> 0:51:48.440
<v Speaker 1>twenty five percent capacity. So Sunday night, Heidi and I

0:51:48.520 --> 0:51:49.840
<v Speaker 1>and the girls we went out to dinner for the

0:51:49.880 --> 0:51:51.480
<v Speaker 1>first time. We hadn't been out to dinner and I

0:51:51.520 --> 0:51:54.279
<v Speaker 1>don't know two three months, and so we went out.

0:51:54.320 --> 0:51:59.840
<v Speaker 1>We went out to sushi, which the girls love. Heidi,

0:52:00.280 --> 0:52:02.759
<v Speaker 1>I actually like sushi too, although Fred of mine was laughing,

0:52:02.840 --> 0:52:05.440
<v Speaker 1>went your first meal, you went out for bait. But

0:52:05.719 --> 0:52:10.000
<v Speaker 1>well yeah, um, but now look, we we wore masks

0:52:10.040 --> 0:52:12.080
<v Speaker 1>into the restaurant. You had to take them off. You

0:52:12.080 --> 0:52:15.840
<v Speaker 1>obviously can't eat with a mask on. But all the

0:52:15.960 --> 0:52:19.960
<v Speaker 1>tables were spread apart, pretty far apart um. And it's

0:52:20.000 --> 0:52:23.680
<v Speaker 1>at twenty five percent capacity. And the plan hopefully if if,

0:52:23.719 --> 0:52:27.080
<v Speaker 1>if the numbers supported in Texas. What the governor's laid

0:52:27.120 --> 0:52:30.000
<v Speaker 1>out is to shift to fifty percent capacity and then

0:52:30.120 --> 0:52:33.839
<v Speaker 1>keep keep going to you till you get up that

0:52:34.000 --> 0:52:36.680
<v Speaker 1>very state by state. I gotta say, if if if

0:52:36.719 --> 0:52:40.040
<v Speaker 1>CB is in a blue state with a Democratic governor

0:52:40.080 --> 0:52:42.040
<v Speaker 1>who is focused on I hate Trump and want to

0:52:42.040 --> 0:52:45.640
<v Speaker 1>stay shut down forever, you know, my advice might be

0:52:46.640 --> 0:52:51.279
<v Speaker 1>moved somewhere. Yeah, right where where you don't have politicians

0:52:51.280 --> 0:52:53.920
<v Speaker 1>who are as crazy. I've been thinking about that everyday.

0:52:53.960 --> 0:52:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Senator from Quentin, do you think that China should just

0:52:58.560 --> 0:53:01.240
<v Speaker 1>cancel the debt that we owe them since they've cost

0:53:01.480 --> 0:53:03.680
<v Speaker 1>the US trillions? That seems like a simple answer to

0:53:03.719 --> 0:53:07.760
<v Speaker 1>the debt one? Why can't we do that? Oh? Look,

0:53:08.000 --> 0:53:14.719
<v Speaker 1>if I had a magic wand sure, um, they're not

0:53:14.800 --> 0:53:19.200
<v Speaker 1>going to Um. We need to deal with them seriously.

0:53:19.320 --> 0:53:23.920
<v Speaker 1>But there's some folks saying, okay, let's seize Chinese assets. Okay,

0:53:24.760 --> 0:53:27.480
<v Speaker 1>but look, when you're dealing with foreign policy, right we

0:53:27.520 --> 0:53:29.239
<v Speaker 1>seize a bunch of Chinese assets, you know what they're

0:53:29.280 --> 0:53:31.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna do. They're gonna see a bunch of American assets

0:53:31.200 --> 0:53:35.520
<v Speaker 1>like you know, you know that that's that is a

0:53:35.640 --> 0:53:38.920
<v Speaker 1>dangerous road to go down. So would I love it.

0:53:39.040 --> 0:53:41.440
<v Speaker 1>You know if if I'd also love it, if my

0:53:41.480 --> 0:53:44.600
<v Speaker 1>mortgage company forgave my death, that'd be nice. So yes,

0:53:45.040 --> 0:53:49.240
<v Speaker 1>But would it would I love it? Of course I would.

0:53:49.320 --> 0:53:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Do I really have any ability to make it happen? No, um.

0:53:54.239 --> 0:53:56.279
<v Speaker 1>When it comes to China, I think of it in

0:53:56.320 --> 0:53:59.719
<v Speaker 1>phases number one. We need a real accounting. We need

0:53:59.760 --> 0:54:02.200
<v Speaker 1>a real accounting of their responsibility. You and I have

0:54:02.239 --> 0:54:04.680
<v Speaker 1>talked at length on this podcast. We were among the

0:54:04.719 --> 0:54:08.560
<v Speaker 1>first to talk about how the preponderance of the evidence

0:54:08.680 --> 0:54:11.560
<v Speaker 1>is this virus likely came from one of the two

0:54:11.640 --> 0:54:17.360
<v Speaker 1>Chinese labs in Wuhan that was studying coronaviruses derived from bats.

0:54:17.960 --> 0:54:20.759
<v Speaker 1>One of those labs was three hundred yards from the

0:54:20.800 --> 0:54:25.319
<v Speaker 1>wet market in Wuhan where this outbreak occurred. By the way,

0:54:25.400 --> 0:54:29.000
<v Speaker 1>the nearest bats we know of that have have comparable

0:54:29.080 --> 0:54:33.200
<v Speaker 1>viruses are a thousand miles away in caves in China. Right.

0:54:33.760 --> 0:54:39.200
<v Speaker 1>Not only that, we know that the Chinese government demanded

0:54:39.239 --> 0:54:45.040
<v Speaker 1>of these labs they destroy their samples. Now, when you destroy,

0:54:45.080 --> 0:54:48.080
<v Speaker 1>you when you destroy evidence that raises an inference, and

0:54:48.080 --> 0:54:50.480
<v Speaker 1>by the way, courts do this all the time. If

0:54:50.520 --> 0:54:53.000
<v Speaker 1>you destroy avidace, you're in litigation, you go destroy adace,

0:54:54.239 --> 0:54:57.640
<v Speaker 1>that raises an inference that the evidence would have revealed

0:54:57.719 --> 0:55:02.319
<v Speaker 1>something damning to use something that shows your responsibility. The

0:55:02.320 --> 0:55:05.600
<v Speaker 1>fact that they destroyed those samples does a lot. And

0:55:05.840 --> 0:55:08.960
<v Speaker 1>let me say something also, So there are lots of

0:55:09.600 --> 0:55:12.320
<v Speaker 1>people pretending to be learned saying, oh, the evidence is

0:55:12.360 --> 0:55:17.560
<v Speaker 1>all circumstantial. Yea, that's actually true. Most people, Michael, who

0:55:17.560 --> 0:55:20.160
<v Speaker 1>are not lawyers, don't know the difference between circumstantial and

0:55:20.160 --> 0:55:27.040
<v Speaker 1>direct evidence. Direct evidence is let's say an eyewitness, if

0:55:27.160 --> 0:55:30.759
<v Speaker 1>I see you point a gun at somebody and shoot them,

0:55:30.760 --> 0:55:34.000
<v Speaker 1>and I testify I saw Michael shoot so and so

0:55:34.160 --> 0:55:38.840
<v Speaker 1>that's direct evidence. Circumstantial evidence. Let's say you've gone to

0:55:38.880 --> 0:55:43.360
<v Speaker 1>the opera and you're watching the opera and suddenly you

0:55:43.480 --> 0:55:45.839
<v Speaker 1>see an you hear a gunshot, you see a man

0:55:46.000 --> 0:55:50.080
<v Speaker 1>leap from the balcony holding a gun saying six semper

0:55:50.120 --> 0:55:56.000
<v Speaker 1>turannis and run off. Now that's all circumstantial evidence that

0:55:56.040 --> 0:55:58.560
<v Speaker 1>you just saw John Wilkes Booth shoot Abraham Lincoln. But

0:55:58.600 --> 0:56:02.600
<v Speaker 1>if you didn't see it, that is circumstantial. By the way,

0:56:02.640 --> 0:56:06.960
<v Speaker 1>people get convicted on circumstantial evidence all the time. It

0:56:07.080 --> 0:56:11.719
<v Speaker 1>is simply looking to the circumstances and drawing reasonable inferences

0:56:13.040 --> 0:56:20.400
<v Speaker 1>the evidence we have, and it suggests the most rational

0:56:20.560 --> 0:56:24.840
<v Speaker 1>assessment is this lab, one of these two labs or

0:56:24.920 --> 0:56:30.640
<v Speaker 1>both was studying this virus and presumably it escaped accidentally.

0:56:31.880 --> 0:56:34.880
<v Speaker 1>And the media fact checkers that try to refute this,

0:56:34.920 --> 0:56:37.640
<v Speaker 1>what they keep saying is there's no evidence this was

0:56:37.640 --> 0:56:43.279
<v Speaker 1>a bioweapon released deliberately. Well do even as bad as

0:56:43.320 --> 0:56:47.600
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese are, right, Okay, maybe look at anything's possible.

0:56:47.640 --> 0:56:50.680
<v Speaker 1>But I agree that there is not evidence that they

0:56:50.880 --> 0:56:56.319
<v Speaker 1>released a bioweapon to kill their own own people. But

0:56:56.440 --> 0:56:59.400
<v Speaker 1>we do know that they were studying bat coronaviruses in

0:56:59.640 --> 0:57:04.560
<v Speaker 1>these labs right there where the outbreak occurred. Let's start

0:57:04.560 --> 0:57:09.440
<v Speaker 1>with a real accounting was the novel coronavirus in those labs?

0:57:09.480 --> 0:57:11.719
<v Speaker 1>What were the safety protocols? We know also the State

0:57:11.760 --> 0:57:17.320
<v Speaker 1>Department had two internal wires before this crisis, raising concerns

0:57:17.360 --> 0:57:21.160
<v Speaker 1>about the shoddy security protocols and actually warning that the

0:57:21.760 --> 0:57:24.200
<v Speaker 1>security was so shoddy it could lead to a global

0:57:24.240 --> 0:57:30.120
<v Speaker 1>pandemic of coronavirus. That sounds kind of relevant. Yeah, we

0:57:30.240 --> 0:57:34.800
<v Speaker 1>also know for a fact that the Chinese government covered

0:57:34.800 --> 0:57:36.680
<v Speaker 1>it up, that they suppressed it, that they hit it,

0:57:37.200 --> 0:57:41.520
<v Speaker 1>and so I think we should start with a serious accounting,

0:57:41.640 --> 0:57:44.800
<v Speaker 1>driven by US, driven by third parties, driven by other countries,

0:57:45.040 --> 0:57:48.720
<v Speaker 1>to ascertain it's clear China's directly responsible. We need to

0:57:48.720 --> 0:57:52.960
<v Speaker 1>get the facts. The harder question will be then, therefore, what,

0:57:55.440 --> 0:57:59.280
<v Speaker 1>yes they should pay, how they should pay? To be honest,

0:57:59.320 --> 0:58:01.160
<v Speaker 1>we're going to be addling with them. I don't think

0:58:01.200 --> 0:58:03.959
<v Speaker 1>they're going to pull out a checkbook willingly anytime soon.

0:58:04.560 --> 0:58:06.439
<v Speaker 1>So we're going to have to figure that out back

0:58:06.440 --> 0:58:09.200
<v Speaker 1>and forth. And one of the things that will make

0:58:09.280 --> 0:58:13.440
<v Speaker 1>us more able to be vigorous in solving that is

0:58:13.520 --> 0:58:16.360
<v Speaker 1>decoupling from China. So much of our supply chain right

0:58:16.360 --> 0:58:19.200
<v Speaker 1>now is dependent on China. So many of our life

0:58:19.200 --> 0:58:23.480
<v Speaker 1>saving medicines are manufactured in China. I am fighting hard

0:58:23.760 --> 0:58:27.360
<v Speaker 1>to bring that manufacturing back to the US so that

0:58:27.400 --> 0:58:29.560
<v Speaker 1>they don't have the ability to do what they threatened

0:58:29.600 --> 0:58:32.160
<v Speaker 1>to do during this crisis, which has cut off life

0:58:32.240 --> 0:58:37.120
<v Speaker 1>saving medicines and kill Americans. As long as we're intertwined

0:58:37.160 --> 0:58:42.920
<v Speaker 1>with them, the ability to lean in is constrained and dangerous.

0:58:43.480 --> 0:58:45.720
<v Speaker 1>But let's start with a full accounting, and at the

0:58:45.760 --> 0:58:49.160
<v Speaker 1>same time, let's be decoupling. That's such an important point.

0:58:49.160 --> 0:58:52.040
<v Speaker 1>It seems like common sense. There's no such thing as

0:58:52.040 --> 0:58:55.280
<v Speaker 1>a free lunch. Right, So I've lost audio. You've lost me.

0:58:56.280 --> 0:58:58.760
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if the rest of the audience can hear me.

0:58:58.920 --> 0:59:01.440
<v Speaker 1>But it's a good thing that, Michael, you're such a

0:59:01.440 --> 0:59:05.280
<v Speaker 1>good actor, because the next question is going to have

0:59:05.360 --> 0:59:08.640
<v Speaker 1>to be mine. See. I don't know if you can

0:59:08.680 --> 0:59:11.080
<v Speaker 1>hear me, but can you do a box? Yes, I

0:59:11.120 --> 0:59:15.160
<v Speaker 1>would say for the next question. Okab still I have

0:59:15.280 --> 0:59:18.600
<v Speaker 1>zero audio. I'll, i'll, I will learn sign language before

0:59:18.680 --> 0:59:21.560
<v Speaker 1>the next episode. But until then, I will take that

0:59:21.840 --> 0:59:26.880
<v Speaker 1>as a providential sign, either from the heavens above or

0:59:27.320 --> 0:59:30.560
<v Speaker 1>from the Chinese government you know that's tapping into our

0:59:30.720 --> 0:59:33.440
<v Speaker 1>streams or anything in the middle, that that will have

0:59:33.440 --> 0:59:35.480
<v Speaker 1>to be the end of this episode. Almost at one

0:59:35.480 --> 0:59:38.520
<v Speaker 1>hour by the dot, I'm back, Senator, you're back. You know.

0:59:38.720 --> 0:59:41.320
<v Speaker 1>I have a theory that it was the Chinese government

0:59:41.360 --> 0:59:43.880
<v Speaker 1>hacking into our streamline because they didn't like all the

0:59:43.880 --> 0:59:46.880
<v Speaker 1>things that you were saying. I think that's right. By

0:59:46.920 --> 0:59:49.440
<v Speaker 1>the way, could you hear me? Yes, I could hear you,

0:59:49.600 --> 0:59:52.600
<v Speaker 1>and I guess you couldn't understand my sign language. In

0:59:52.640 --> 0:59:56.960
<v Speaker 1>my miming, I must say you know, for someone that

0:59:57.040 --> 1:00:01.200
<v Speaker 1>makes a living in Hollywood as an actor, an exceptionally

1:00:01.320 --> 1:00:06.520
<v Speaker 1>poor box. You know. I'm just listen, Senator. You say

1:00:06.560 --> 1:00:09.080
<v Speaker 1>you don't surround yourself with yes men. Clearly I don't

1:00:09.120 --> 1:00:13.360
<v Speaker 1>surround myself with yes men either. I take your constructive criticism.

1:00:13.960 --> 1:00:16.439
<v Speaker 1>You know, though, what's amazing is that audio cut out

1:00:16.760 --> 1:00:20.320
<v Speaker 1>almost exactly at one hour, so we I think we've

1:00:21.120 --> 1:00:24.160
<v Speaker 1>exhausted not even one tenth of the questions, but we'll

1:00:24.200 --> 1:00:27.080
<v Speaker 1>have to save the rest for the next episode. In

1:00:27.080 --> 1:00:30.480
<v Speaker 1>the meantime, Senator, I look forward to hopefully seeing you

1:00:30.520 --> 1:00:33.400
<v Speaker 1>in person one of these days sometime soon. We'll have

1:00:33.400 --> 1:00:35.840
<v Speaker 1>to wait and see as we reopen. I'm Michael Knowles.

1:00:35.880 --> 1:00:37.680
<v Speaker 1>This is verdict with Ted Cruz.