WEBVTT - Engine Explosion Spurring Boeing 777 Groundings

0:00:01.800 --> 0:00:04.400
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Carol Masser and I'm

0:00:04.440 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stanibek. We're here every day bringing

0:00:07.280 --> 0:00:09.799
<v Speaker 1>you the latest news from the world of business and finance,

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 1>plus technology, politics, economics, all harnessing the power of Business

0:00:13.640 --> 0:00:17.119
<v Speaker 1>Week reporters and editors, not to mention our journalists and

0:00:17.120 --> 0:00:19.600
<v Speaker 1>analyst in more than one and twenty countries. You can

0:00:19.640 --> 0:00:23.200
<v Speaker 1>download Bloomberg Business Week and iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot Com.

0:00:23.400 --> 0:00:25.120
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen to our radio show at two

0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:27.840
<v Speaker 1>pm Eastern Time on Bloomberg Radio, or watch us on

0:00:27.880 --> 0:00:34.320
<v Speaker 1>YouTube search Bloomberg Global News. Everyone's talking about those new

0:00:34.320 --> 0:00:36.720
<v Speaker 1>findings in the UK that how the COVID I ten

0:00:36.840 --> 0:00:39.600
<v Speaker 1>vaccines are providing a high level of protection against infection

0:00:39.640 --> 0:00:42.680
<v Speaker 1>and illness after a single dose. I mean, there's implications

0:00:42.680 --> 0:00:45.240
<v Speaker 1>of this, there are, but it's great news that you know. Look,

0:00:45.320 --> 0:00:47.159
<v Speaker 1>this is happening in real time. We've talked about this

0:00:47.159 --> 0:00:50.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot totally. These vaccines are used under emergency use authorization.

0:00:50.560 --> 0:00:53.240
<v Speaker 1>It means they haven't been tested in the same way

0:00:53.240 --> 0:00:55.920
<v Speaker 1>that all vaccines are usually tested over a year's long period.

0:00:56.160 --> 0:00:57.880
<v Speaker 1>So we are learning things now that we didn't know

0:00:57.960 --> 0:01:00.040
<v Speaker 1>yet write the data sets continue to come out, So

0:01:00.120 --> 0:01:03.279
<v Speaker 1>let's get into it with Dr Sandro Galleia. He's back

0:01:03.320 --> 0:01:05.920
<v Speaker 1>with Ustina, professor at Boston University School of Public Health,

0:01:05.959 --> 0:01:08.679
<v Speaker 1>author of the upcoming book The Contagion Next Time that

0:01:08.800 --> 0:01:11.120
<v Speaker 1>is due out in the fall. Dr Galia is so

0:01:11.240 --> 0:01:13.280
<v Speaker 1>nice to have you back with us. Um, how are you.

0:01:14.600 --> 0:01:16.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm wel Carol, thank you for having me to hear

0:01:16.600 --> 0:01:18.440
<v Speaker 1>from you again. Well, it's great to hear from you

0:01:18.520 --> 0:01:20.720
<v Speaker 1>as well. So tell us about this news out of

0:01:20.760 --> 0:01:23.360
<v Speaker 1>the UK, and I think there's you know what this

0:01:23.440 --> 0:01:29.640
<v Speaker 1>might mean in terms of asymptomatic infection and you know,

0:01:29.840 --> 0:01:32.880
<v Speaker 1>transmission of COVID. I mean, these are things that are

0:01:32.920 --> 0:01:35.000
<v Speaker 1>that are coming out. Tell us about the significance of

0:01:35.040 --> 0:01:38.160
<v Speaker 1>this or what you see maybe as a significance. Yeah,

0:01:38.240 --> 0:01:42.039
<v Speaker 1>this vaccine has been consistently remarkable, really vaccine news. I

0:01:42.040 --> 0:01:44.120
<v Speaker 1>mean we have we shouldn't forget as a world that

0:01:44.200 --> 0:01:46.840
<v Speaker 1>we have achieved something extraordinary in terms of vaccines available

0:01:47.040 --> 0:01:49.440
<v Speaker 1>in such a short period of time. The latest news

0:01:49.600 --> 0:01:53.279
<v Speaker 1>shows that the single dose of the vaccine is highly

0:01:53.320 --> 0:01:57.080
<v Speaker 1>efficacious in terms of preventing symptomatic COVID, but also I'll

0:01:57.080 --> 0:02:00.320
<v Speaker 1>get to in a second, preventing severe COVID and really

0:02:00.360 --> 0:02:02.720
<v Speaker 1>makes a difference, right because we have been we have

0:02:02.840 --> 0:02:06.520
<v Speaker 1>been accounting for vaccination rates assuming that everybody is getting

0:02:06.520 --> 0:02:08.679
<v Speaker 1>two vaccines. But if we can have a lot of

0:02:08.720 --> 0:02:11.000
<v Speaker 1>people getting one vaccine, that will allow us to do

0:02:11.080 --> 0:02:14.240
<v Speaker 1>things much faster. On the Fiser vaccine front, news also

0:02:14.280 --> 0:02:16.800
<v Speaker 1>came out that the Fiser vaccine can be kept in

0:02:16.800 --> 0:02:19.080
<v Speaker 1>a regular freezer, doesn't have to be a minus a

0:02:19.120 --> 0:02:22.000
<v Speaker 1>DE freezer, which from a supply chain point of view

0:02:22.000 --> 0:02:26.480
<v Speaker 1>makes a big difference. So this really creates opportunities for

0:02:26.639 --> 0:02:31.880
<v Speaker 1>national governments to stretch the vaccine much further then we

0:02:31.919 --> 0:02:33.799
<v Speaker 1>have done so far, because of course, as you know,

0:02:34.360 --> 0:02:38.080
<v Speaker 1>our limitation has been the manufacturing that we have not

0:02:38.120 --> 0:02:40.360
<v Speaker 1>been able to manufacture and provide as many vaccines as

0:02:40.400 --> 0:02:43.280
<v Speaker 1>we need to vaccinate everybody as quickly as possible. So

0:02:43.520 --> 0:02:46.320
<v Speaker 1>this is really all good. And you also Carrel mentioned

0:02:46.320 --> 0:02:51.240
<v Speaker 1>the variance and the data are that this vaccine appears

0:02:51.240 --> 0:02:54.360
<v Speaker 1>to be explicacious as well against the UK variant. Now

0:02:54.360 --> 0:02:57.320
<v Speaker 1>there's still some questions about the South African variant, but

0:02:57.560 --> 0:03:00.440
<v Speaker 1>this is all this is all positive know. So much

0:03:00.440 --> 0:03:03.200
<v Speaker 1>of the early data that we see come from countries

0:03:03.280 --> 0:03:06.760
<v Speaker 1>using the visor BioNTech vaccine, But we don't see many

0:03:06.760 --> 0:03:10.040
<v Speaker 1>of these early results showing what's going on with the

0:03:10.080 --> 0:03:12.919
<v Speaker 1>MODERNA vaccine, which is the vaccine that so many Americans

0:03:13.520 --> 0:03:17.639
<v Speaker 1>have been getting. Should we expect that we'd see similar

0:03:17.720 --> 0:03:22.040
<v Speaker 1>results because they're both MR and A vaccines, I think so.

0:03:22.160 --> 0:03:24.519
<v Speaker 1>I think I think you can for a variet of reasons.

0:03:24.520 --> 0:03:27.560
<v Speaker 1>One is the very similar mechanism, as you say, and

0:03:27.560 --> 0:03:29.959
<v Speaker 1>and the data that we do have actually showed that

0:03:30.000 --> 0:03:32.160
<v Speaker 1>the two words very similarly. We didn't talk in the

0:03:32.160 --> 0:03:36.240
<v Speaker 1>first round about severe COVID. So what's the most amazing

0:03:36.240 --> 0:03:40.240
<v Speaker 1>thing about these vaccines is that they have essentially reduced

0:03:40.280 --> 0:03:43.720
<v Speaker 1>severe COVID dramatically, even much more dramatic than a sinmtematic COVID.

0:03:43.880 --> 0:03:46.280
<v Speaker 1>And ultimately that's what we want, right, Ultimately we do

0:03:46.360 --> 0:03:50.360
<v Speaker 1>not want COVID to be severe. So all the vaccine

0:03:50.400 --> 0:03:52.760
<v Speaker 1>trials out there, there really has not been a single

0:03:53.120 --> 0:03:55.760
<v Speaker 1>death from COVID in anybody who receives vaccine. And that's

0:03:55.840 --> 0:03:59.200
<v Speaker 1>in all the five vaccines that have been whose trials,

0:03:59.240 --> 0:04:01.960
<v Speaker 1>factory trials, and they're so far so all these vaccines

0:04:02.000 --> 0:04:05.680
<v Speaker 1>really are highly effective against reducing what we want them

0:04:05.720 --> 0:04:08.880
<v Speaker 1>to reduce, which is severe COVID, right, And that's what

0:04:09.000 --> 0:04:14.520
<v Speaker 1>it ultimately is about. Do you have um confidence by

0:04:14.600 --> 0:04:21.080
<v Speaker 1>spring by summer that we will have her immunity. Well,

0:04:21.160 --> 0:04:22.960
<v Speaker 1>confidence is a tough thing to come by and things

0:04:23.000 --> 0:04:27.159
<v Speaker 1>like that these days, I think, I think the best

0:04:27.360 --> 0:04:31.120
<v Speaker 1>models out there, including the cdseas on models, suggests that

0:04:31.200 --> 0:04:36.120
<v Speaker 1>we are will be getting towards towards enough immunity that

0:04:36.240 --> 0:04:39.280
<v Speaker 1>essentially reduces rapid transmission. Of avoiding the term herd immunity

0:04:39.279 --> 0:04:42.600
<v Speaker 1>because it's become bit of a loaded term um by

0:04:42.600 --> 0:04:45.080
<v Speaker 1>by summer. Now, whether or not that means by the

0:04:45.160 --> 0:04:46.760
<v Speaker 1>end of spring, beginning of summer, or by the middle

0:04:46.760 --> 0:04:48.840
<v Speaker 1>of summer, late summer, I think that's very hard to say.

0:04:48.880 --> 0:04:51.520
<v Speaker 1>I think the big caveat that everybody says, when you

0:04:51.560 --> 0:04:54.200
<v Speaker 1>think about this, and all the good models say correctly

0:04:54.880 --> 0:04:58.800
<v Speaker 1>that that assumes the transmissibility of the virus as it

0:04:58.839 --> 0:05:01.680
<v Speaker 1>is now, which means it doesn't take into account if

0:05:01.720 --> 0:05:04.279
<v Speaker 1>any of the variants take over and they're much more transmissible,

0:05:04.279 --> 0:05:06.360
<v Speaker 1>because of course that changes the whole formula. You were

0:05:06.400 --> 0:05:10.400
<v Speaker 1>hesitant about using the word herd immunity. Tell me why well,

0:05:10.440 --> 0:05:12.800
<v Speaker 1>I think that term, like many other terms, as we've

0:05:12.839 --> 0:05:16.279
<v Speaker 1>discussed on the show before, has become politicized. It has somehow.

0:05:16.560 --> 0:05:19.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's a term that has been used in

0:05:19.320 --> 0:05:22.600
<v Speaker 1>um infectiously epitemology for a long time simply to mean

0:05:23.080 --> 0:05:25.040
<v Speaker 1>they wouldn't have a population where there are not enough

0:05:25.080 --> 0:05:28.240
<v Speaker 1>people who are susceptible to the disease that it stops transmission.

0:05:28.440 --> 0:05:31.880
<v Speaker 1>But the terms has acquired these political undertones of well,

0:05:31.920 --> 0:05:35.040
<v Speaker 1>are we letting people get the disease intentionally, which obviously

0:05:35.200 --> 0:05:37.120
<v Speaker 1>is not what it means. And all it means is

0:05:37.560 --> 0:05:39.880
<v Speaker 1>you don't have enough people who are susceptible and the

0:05:40.000 --> 0:05:44.120
<v Speaker 1>virus stops transmitting. Hey, Dr galia Um. Look, these vaccines

0:05:44.160 --> 0:05:45.680
<v Speaker 1>have been out for for more than two months at

0:05:45.760 --> 0:05:47.839
<v Speaker 1>least here in the US. More and more people are

0:05:47.920 --> 0:05:50.920
<v Speaker 1>getting vaccinated. Don't you think that people can start to

0:05:50.960 --> 0:05:54.280
<v Speaker 1>act differently after they've been vaccinated, given how affective these

0:05:54.360 --> 0:05:58.160
<v Speaker 1>vaccines are. Yeah, that's an excellent question, and this has

0:05:58.200 --> 0:06:01.160
<v Speaker 1>been I think controversial lately. You know, I think what

0:06:01.279 --> 0:06:05.000
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing is a lag in our guidance and in

0:06:05.120 --> 0:06:07.640
<v Speaker 1>our systems that are have been put in place to

0:06:07.720 --> 0:06:10.960
<v Speaker 1>protect us with the reality of a post vaccination world.

0:06:11.279 --> 0:06:14.120
<v Speaker 1>And and we've seen some some more and more people writing, well,

0:06:14.320 --> 0:06:17.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, if people are vaccinated, is it not reasonable

0:06:17.240 --> 0:06:19.320
<v Speaker 1>that whence you're vaccine you can expect to re enter

0:06:19.360 --> 0:06:22.160
<v Speaker 1>the world much more fully? The four answer is yes absolutely.

0:06:22.200 --> 0:06:25.120
<v Speaker 1>The short answer is yes absolutely. The problem is the problem.

0:06:25.560 --> 0:06:28.000
<v Speaker 1>The problem is that we don't have enough people vaccinated

0:06:28.120 --> 0:06:30.920
<v Speaker 1>yet to be able to say defectively. All right, I'm

0:06:30.920 --> 0:06:33.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna leave it there. Thank you so much, really appreciate it.

0:06:33.400 --> 0:06:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Dr Sandra Gala doing at the Boston University School of

0:06:36.360 --> 0:06:38.520
<v Speaker 1>Public Health joining us on the phone from Boston. That

0:06:38.560 --> 0:06:40.279
<v Speaker 1>was an important point you made. It's a big question

0:06:40.320 --> 0:06:42.000
<v Speaker 1>that so many of my friends have right now. Right

0:06:42.160 --> 0:06:43.920
<v Speaker 1>it's like our parents are getting vaccinated, when are we

0:06:43.920 --> 0:06:45.159
<v Speaker 1>going to be able to see them? When can our

0:06:45.200 --> 0:06:47.159
<v Speaker 1>kids see their grandparents? Well, and this concern about can

0:06:47.200 --> 0:06:50.280
<v Speaker 1>you get the vaccine but still transmit COVID, it's a key.

0:06:50.480 --> 0:06:54.479
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Masser and Bloomberg

0:06:54.560 --> 0:06:58.720
<v Speaker 1>Quick Takes Tim Stinovic from Bloomberg Radio. This story it

0:06:58.880 --> 0:07:01.440
<v Speaker 1>is still among Burg Business Week, or I should say

0:07:01.440 --> 0:07:03.400
<v Speaker 1>this is still among the most read on the Bloomberg

0:07:03.560 --> 0:07:06.640
<v Speaker 1>terminal and it's by Bloomberg business Week future writer and

0:07:06.960 --> 0:07:10.160
<v Speaker 1>New York Times bestselling author Ashley Vance. He wrote this story.

0:07:10.440 --> 0:07:13.240
<v Speaker 1>He's also host of Hello World and author of Elon Musk,

0:07:13.280 --> 0:07:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Tesla SpaceX, and The Quest for a Fantastic Future. He's

0:07:16.080 --> 0:07:18.760
<v Speaker 1>on the phone from Palo Alto, California. He joins us

0:07:18.760 --> 0:07:21.720
<v Speaker 1>along with Bloomberg business Week nitor Joel Weber, And it's

0:07:21.720 --> 0:07:24.520
<v Speaker 1>about this twenty seven year old who actually, you know,

0:07:24.640 --> 0:07:26.320
<v Speaker 1>living at home with your parents, Joel can be a

0:07:26.360 --> 0:07:30.200
<v Speaker 1>good thing. Yeah, And and Ashley, um, I thought, did

0:07:30.280 --> 0:07:34.680
<v Speaker 1>this amazing job explaining about this twenty seven year old

0:07:34.680 --> 0:07:39.720
<v Speaker 1>who became a COVID nineteen data superstar. And actually, why

0:07:39.720 --> 0:07:42.119
<v Speaker 1>don't you just take us away here? What's his story

0:07:42.160 --> 0:07:46.280
<v Speaker 1>and what's so significant amount? What do you what he's done? Yeah,

0:07:46.640 --> 0:07:48.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is an interesting story that kind of

0:07:48.720 --> 0:07:51.640
<v Speaker 1>pulled me back to the early days of the pandemic.

0:07:51.760 --> 0:07:54.640
<v Speaker 1>But there's a data scientist. His name is Yu Yangu

0:07:55.040 --> 0:07:58.280
<v Speaker 1>and like you mentioned, he was twenty six at the time.

0:07:58.320 --> 0:08:00.320
<v Speaker 1>He's twenty seven now. But you know, if you go

0:08:00.440 --> 0:08:05.000
<v Speaker 1>back to March in April, we were getting all these

0:08:05.080 --> 0:08:08.600
<v Speaker 1>these forecasts for how bad COVID might end up being.

0:08:08.720 --> 0:08:11.920
<v Speaker 1>And there was Imperial College in London that was putting

0:08:11.920 --> 0:08:15.120
<v Speaker 1>out a prominent forecast, and h M E which is

0:08:15.160 --> 0:08:19.040
<v Speaker 1>an institute based in Seattle. And these these forecasts were

0:08:19.040 --> 0:08:21.280
<v Speaker 1>all over the place. One group said, you know, the

0:08:21.400 --> 0:08:24.280
<v Speaker 1>US alone might see two million deaths by the summer.

0:08:24.640 --> 0:08:27.760
<v Speaker 1>H M said fifty thousand deaths, and the pandemic was

0:08:27.760 --> 0:08:30.040
<v Speaker 1>going to wind down quickly. And so there's this kid,

0:08:30.960 --> 0:08:33.160
<v Speaker 1>all these models and the figures all over the place,

0:08:33.240 --> 0:08:36.960
<v Speaker 1>and he decided to get into forecasting death on his own,

0:08:37.080 --> 0:08:39.480
<v Speaker 1>and he turned out to have pretty much the most

0:08:39.559 --> 0:08:43.960
<v Speaker 1>accurate forecast all the way up through about November. All right,

0:08:44.040 --> 0:08:46.520
<v Speaker 1>So Ashley, how did good do it? What? What were

0:08:46.760 --> 0:08:48.640
<v Speaker 1>his data points? I mean, this is a guy who

0:08:48.760 --> 0:08:53.760
<v Speaker 1>understands algorithms and analytic modelings. Yeah, there's kind of two

0:08:53.800 --> 0:08:55.400
<v Speaker 1>things to it. I mean one is he looked at

0:08:55.440 --> 0:08:58.079
<v Speaker 1>the models who were out there and he said, these

0:08:58.520 --> 0:09:01.079
<v Speaker 1>even though these people were sessionals and he had no

0:09:01.280 --> 0:09:03.599
<v Speaker 1>background in this field at all, he said, you know,

0:09:03.640 --> 0:09:05.679
<v Speaker 1>they're putting too many things in their models. So I'm

0:09:05.679 --> 0:09:08.000
<v Speaker 1>going to keep mind really simple. I Am just going

0:09:08.040 --> 0:09:12.239
<v Speaker 1>to look at the death figures being reported by governments.

0:09:12.720 --> 0:09:16.280
<v Speaker 1>And then predict future deaths from that. And then he

0:09:16.960 --> 0:09:21.520
<v Speaker 1>had a skill at machine learning software and basically AI algorithms,

0:09:21.640 --> 0:09:24.160
<v Speaker 1>and so he applied that to his figures, that to

0:09:24.320 --> 0:09:27.400
<v Speaker 1>constantly tune them over time. When the real death figures

0:09:27.400 --> 0:09:29.559
<v Speaker 1>would arrive, he would compare that to his poecast and

0:09:29.640 --> 0:09:32.199
<v Speaker 1>so he kept tuning his model. So he kind of

0:09:32.360 --> 0:09:34.719
<v Speaker 1>kept it simple in some ways, but then added this

0:09:34.920 --> 0:09:38.719
<v Speaker 1>new sophistication that some other people were not using. What

0:09:38.920 --> 0:09:43.720
<v Speaker 1>can we learn about modeling here? Considering that there were

0:09:43.800 --> 0:09:46.880
<v Speaker 1>so many professional organizations actually got that that didn't get

0:09:46.920 --> 0:09:49.800
<v Speaker 1>this right, but this then twenty six year old was

0:09:49.880 --> 0:09:53.440
<v Speaker 1>able to do this much more accurately. Yeah, I mean,

0:09:53.480 --> 0:09:54.960
<v Speaker 1>I guess there are a couple of things I picked

0:09:55.040 --> 0:09:57.880
<v Speaker 1>up from my interviews. You know. One is that I

0:09:58.080 --> 0:10:02.160
<v Speaker 1>was surprised that sort of this field wasn't, you know,

0:10:02.800 --> 0:10:06.199
<v Speaker 1>already dialed in, and that there was are like tried

0:10:06.320 --> 0:10:09.079
<v Speaker 1>and true things that we we knew you could go to.

0:10:09.320 --> 0:10:11.960
<v Speaker 1>And and so you know, his argument and the argument

0:10:12.040 --> 0:10:14.280
<v Speaker 1>that some other people made to me is that is

0:10:14.320 --> 0:10:17.600
<v Speaker 1>that academics, professors, people at some of these institutes, they

0:10:17.720 --> 0:10:21.240
<v Speaker 1>tend to try and make their models more sophisticated and

0:10:21.360 --> 0:10:23.800
<v Speaker 1>nuanced by adding complexity because they're kind of trying to

0:10:23.840 --> 0:10:27.400
<v Speaker 1>show off and do something new that their peers aren't doing.

0:10:27.520 --> 0:10:29.599
<v Speaker 1>And so, you know, he went the simple route. I

0:10:29.679 --> 0:10:32.240
<v Speaker 1>was like, no, this is this is actually how you

0:10:32.320 --> 0:10:35.000
<v Speaker 1>get closer to the truth. And the other thing is that,

0:10:35.200 --> 0:10:39.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, we've seen over time that the individual models

0:10:39.440 --> 0:10:44.199
<v Speaker 1>really do not work as well as taking models together,

0:10:44.360 --> 0:10:47.600
<v Speaker 1>blending them and then looking at what that blended model

0:10:47.679 --> 0:10:50.160
<v Speaker 1>tells you. And so, you know, a big takeaway was

0:10:50.600 --> 0:10:53.559
<v Speaker 1>the next time there's a health crisis, you don't want

0:10:53.600 --> 0:10:57.079
<v Speaker 1>to play too much stock. Maybe in these these individual

0:10:57.160 --> 0:10:59.319
<v Speaker 1>models that come out in the first week or two

0:10:59.360 --> 0:11:02.439
<v Speaker 1>weeks of a crisis, you hopefully we'd be in a

0:11:02.480 --> 0:11:07.000
<v Speaker 1>better situation where there's there's numerous models right from the

0:11:07.040 --> 0:11:08.880
<v Speaker 1>get go that we can kind of blend together and

0:11:09.440 --> 0:11:13.160
<v Speaker 1>get something closer to the truth. So what what's Goog

0:11:13.640 --> 0:11:16.480
<v Speaker 1>doing now? And what what does he uh? What does

0:11:16.520 --> 0:11:18.800
<v Speaker 1>he think he'll crack next? It seems like you know

0:11:19.120 --> 0:11:21.439
<v Speaker 1>this kind of modeling, Uh, you know, you go work

0:11:21.480 --> 0:11:24.040
<v Speaker 1>at a hedge fund and make billions of dollars? Is that?

0:11:24.120 --> 0:11:27.280
<v Speaker 1>What is that in the store? Well, this was the

0:11:27.320 --> 0:11:29.280
<v Speaker 1>funny I mean it's the interesting part of the story.

0:11:29.280 --> 0:11:31.199
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he was, he was in fight it, he

0:11:31.320 --> 0:11:35.280
<v Speaker 1>was doing trading forecast, and then right right when the

0:11:35.280 --> 0:11:37.839
<v Speaker 1>parademics start, right before it started, he had decided to

0:11:38.440 --> 0:11:40.240
<v Speaker 1>do a start up with the buddy. He was going

0:11:40.280 --> 0:11:43.240
<v Speaker 1>to get into sports analytics. He was pretty kg about

0:11:43.280 --> 0:11:45.400
<v Speaker 1>telling me exactly what it was. It sounded like some

0:11:45.600 --> 0:11:49.120
<v Speaker 1>sort of like maybe sports betting thing or something like that.

0:11:49.440 --> 0:11:53.400
<v Speaker 1>And then you know, he volunteered his time during these

0:11:53.880 --> 0:11:57.720
<v Speaker 1>death forecasts and and has been sucked into the public

0:11:57.920 --> 0:12:01.880
<v Speaker 1>health world. And now he's he's getting recruited by um

0:12:02.120 --> 0:12:04.160
<v Speaker 1>all kinds of folks, and I think he's kind of

0:12:04.240 --> 0:12:06.160
<v Speaker 1>like changed the course of his life. I think he

0:12:06.200 --> 0:12:08.760
<v Speaker 1>wants to get into public health now. He's he's sort

0:12:08.800 --> 0:12:12.280
<v Speaker 1>of he's kind of averse to all the politics of

0:12:12.320 --> 0:12:14.280
<v Speaker 1>the money that didn't He just wants to be a pure,

0:12:14.480 --> 0:12:17.959
<v Speaker 1>pure data driven guy. Well, but what actually has happened

0:12:17.960 --> 0:12:19.680
<v Speaker 1>to his data sets now, because from what I understand

0:12:19.720 --> 0:12:23.079
<v Speaker 1>from your story, kind of stopped right yeah, when he

0:12:23.160 --> 0:12:28.800
<v Speaker 1>stopped the deaf forecast around October November, because everybody's numbers

0:12:28.840 --> 0:12:31.839
<v Speaker 1>started to kind of coalesce around a pretty similar place. Now,

0:12:32.080 --> 0:12:36.320
<v Speaker 1>he's forecasting basically kind of herd immunity. He's looking at

0:12:36.720 --> 0:12:40.199
<v Speaker 1>the vaccination rate, the you know, how many people have

0:12:40.320 --> 0:12:43.240
<v Speaker 1>actually caught COVID. He thinks a lot more people have

0:12:43.400 --> 0:12:46.600
<v Speaker 1>caught it than than sort of the official numbers reports.

0:12:46.880 --> 0:12:48.920
<v Speaker 1>And so he's trying to model out kind of where

0:12:49.000 --> 0:12:51.360
<v Speaker 1>we might end up. And so for the US, you know,

0:12:51.520 --> 0:12:54.040
<v Speaker 1>her immunity is kind of like a sort of a

0:12:54.120 --> 0:12:57.640
<v Speaker 1>vague nobody knows exactly what the right number is on that,

0:12:57.800 --> 0:13:00.240
<v Speaker 1>but you know, he has us in the U asked

0:13:00.240 --> 0:13:04.320
<v Speaker 1>about six of the population would either have the vaccine

0:13:04.400 --> 0:13:08.360
<v Speaker 1>or have already caught um the virus and be approaching

0:13:08.640 --> 0:13:12.040
<v Speaker 1>something like her immunity by June. All right, well, time

0:13:12.080 --> 0:13:17.079
<v Speaker 1>stamp it. Yeah, it's impressive. Was he living in the

0:13:17.120 --> 0:13:18.880
<v Speaker 1>parents basement? That's what we all We just want to

0:13:18.920 --> 0:13:21.679
<v Speaker 1>know when he did this. Yeah, he was. He was

0:13:21.760 --> 0:13:24.160
<v Speaker 1>in Santa Clara's I live out here in Silicon Valley.

0:13:24.160 --> 0:13:26.800
<v Speaker 1>We don't really have basements, but it's definitely a living room,

0:13:28.160 --> 0:13:30.679
<v Speaker 1>like a side room. Um, and yeah, so he was

0:13:30.760 --> 0:13:33.720
<v Speaker 1>staying with his parents during there. In the bulk he's

0:13:33.760 --> 0:13:37.160
<v Speaker 1>moved and moved to New York. Well, we look forward

0:13:37.160 --> 0:13:39.679
<v Speaker 1>to see what more on that next chapter. Ashley, Thank

0:13:39.720 --> 0:13:42.400
<v Speaker 1>you so much. Ashley Vance features writer Bloomberg Business Week

0:13:42.440 --> 0:13:44.920
<v Speaker 1>on the phone from Palo Alto, along with Joe Webber,

0:13:45.160 --> 0:13:47.240
<v Speaker 1>editor of Bloomberg buses this week on the remote access

0:13:47.360 --> 0:13:55.440
<v Speaker 1>from Brooklyn. This is Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Masser

0:13:55.679 --> 0:14:00.560
<v Speaker 1>and Bloomberg Quick Takes. Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio. All right,

0:14:00.600 --> 0:14:02.360
<v Speaker 1>you are listening to Bloomberg Business Week. It's brought to

0:14:02.400 --> 0:14:05.200
<v Speaker 1>you by SEI, with an operating platform designed to support

0:14:05.240 --> 0:14:08.880
<v Speaker 1>all major asset classes, diverse strategies, and investment vehicles. SEI

0:14:09.360 --> 0:14:11.599
<v Speaker 1>is redefining wealth management. Learn more at se i C

0:14:11.760 --> 0:14:14.720
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash I m s. Well, there are Tim

0:14:14.840 --> 0:14:17.040
<v Speaker 1>a couple of provocative columns on China to tell you

0:14:17.080 --> 0:14:20.320
<v Speaker 1>about today. One about China's plan for cashless society and

0:14:20.360 --> 0:14:23.440
<v Speaker 1>the goal and implications of such. That's something to come,

0:14:23.960 --> 0:14:26.600
<v Speaker 1>and then something that's already here, China's massive and impressive

0:14:26.640 --> 0:14:29.080
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure and how it's really time for the US to

0:14:29.160 --> 0:14:31.560
<v Speaker 1>get worked up about it. I love these columns. Thought

0:14:31.600 --> 0:14:34.320
<v Speaker 1>provoking and let's get into it with Bloomberg New Economy

0:14:34.440 --> 0:14:37.880
<v Speaker 1>Editorial director Andy Brown. He writes about both a he

0:14:38.080 --> 0:14:40.400
<v Speaker 1>is on the phone in our New York City Bureau. Andy.

0:14:40.440 --> 0:14:42.360
<v Speaker 1>I know you're just around the corner, one floor down,

0:14:42.880 --> 0:14:46.160
<v Speaker 1>but we're all socially distancing. Great columns, And I have

0:14:46.280 --> 0:14:49.480
<v Speaker 1>to say, these two stories remind me in many ways

0:14:49.560 --> 0:14:52.280
<v Speaker 1>how China is way ahead of the US and the

0:14:52.360 --> 0:14:56.880
<v Speaker 1>rest of the world on so much already exactly. I mean,

0:14:57.000 --> 0:15:02.880
<v Speaker 1>these blackouts in Texas illustrate the perless state of US infrastructure.

0:15:02.960 --> 0:15:06.240
<v Speaker 1>And it's it's not just the power grid, it's the

0:15:06.320 --> 0:15:14.800
<v Speaker 1>transportation network. It's highways, it's railways, it's airports, it's telecommunications networks,

0:15:14.840 --> 0:15:17.360
<v Speaker 1>and and and in all these areas, one can't help

0:15:17.440 --> 0:15:21.280
<v Speaker 1>but compare and contrust with China, which is which is

0:15:21.360 --> 0:15:23.960
<v Speaker 1>streets ahead? I mean, this is this is a national

0:15:24.320 --> 0:15:26.040
<v Speaker 1>This has risen to the level I think of a

0:15:26.200 --> 0:15:29.360
<v Speaker 1>national security threat for the United States. I mean it

0:15:29.520 --> 0:15:35.120
<v Speaker 1>goes to the heart of economic competitiveness, military readiness, climate change, resilience,

0:15:35.520 --> 0:15:40.200
<v Speaker 1>innovation capacity. Um, you know, you you've got a situation

0:15:40.400 --> 0:15:45.080
<v Speaker 1>now where China has rolled out a five G network

0:15:45.160 --> 0:15:48.360
<v Speaker 1>in America hasn't really got started, and it's giving China

0:15:48.480 --> 0:15:51.400
<v Speaker 1>a jump on all of the industries of the future

0:15:51.480 --> 0:15:57.240
<v Speaker 1>from smart cities, advanced manufacturing, autonomous vehicles, and so on

0:15:57.400 --> 0:15:59.840
<v Speaker 1>and so forth. This is the way to compete with

0:16:00.240 --> 0:16:02.920
<v Speaker 1>as Joe Biden is trying to say, is we need

0:16:03.040 --> 0:16:05.920
<v Speaker 1>to invest in infrastructure or China is going to come

0:16:06.160 --> 0:16:08.800
<v Speaker 1>and eat a lunch. And actually, an area after area,

0:16:08.920 --> 0:16:12.480
<v Speaker 1>China has already eaten America's lunch. So what's the way

0:16:12.560 --> 0:16:16.440
<v Speaker 1>to do this? In Washington where at this point many

0:16:16.520 --> 0:16:19.560
<v Speaker 1>Republicans will not even acknowledge that there was a free

0:16:19.600 --> 0:16:22.720
<v Speaker 1>and fair election that elected Joe Biden. What I'm saying

0:16:22.840 --> 0:16:26.040
<v Speaker 1>is there's not broad agreement across the challenges that America

0:16:26.120 --> 0:16:29.560
<v Speaker 1>faces or perhaps the solutions to those challenges. Well, I

0:16:29.600 --> 0:16:32.480
<v Speaker 1>guess what I'm saying is is the first step is

0:16:32.560 --> 0:16:36.760
<v Speaker 1>to recognize the threat um you know, and and America

0:16:36.840 --> 0:16:41.000
<v Speaker 1>has been here before. You know, back in nineteen fifty seven,

0:16:41.120 --> 0:16:45.240
<v Speaker 1>there was this spot Nik moment right where Russia launches

0:16:45.400 --> 0:16:49.360
<v Speaker 1>this satellite that you know, that that around around around

0:16:49.400 --> 0:16:54.600
<v Speaker 1>the Earth. And suddenly the Eisenhower administration freaks out and

0:16:54.760 --> 0:16:59.360
<v Speaker 1>realizes that Russia is leaving America behind when it comes

0:16:59.400 --> 0:17:03.200
<v Speaker 1>to space, and he invests, he launches NASA, he makes

0:17:03.360 --> 0:17:08.160
<v Speaker 1>massive investments in science and technology, which ultimately give rise

0:17:08.240 --> 0:17:12.280
<v Speaker 1>to Silicon Valley and spawned the likes of Facebook and Google,

0:17:12.440 --> 0:17:15.720
<v Speaker 1>and and and so on. The danger now, as Eric

0:17:15.800 --> 0:17:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Schmidt pointed out in a in a in a piece

0:17:17.960 --> 0:17:20.800
<v Speaker 1>just the other day in the Financial Times, you know,

0:17:21.240 --> 0:17:25.119
<v Speaker 1>is that the next tech giants and the products and

0:17:25.240 --> 0:17:28.840
<v Speaker 1>the services that they produce are not going to be American.

0:17:28.920 --> 0:17:32.119
<v Speaker 1>They're going to be Chinese. Right. And of course, Eric Schmidt,

0:17:32.160 --> 0:17:34.560
<v Speaker 1>the former chief of Google, andy, you know what, why

0:17:34.640 --> 0:17:39.200
<v Speaker 1>aren't we scared enough as Americans in terms of how

0:17:39.280 --> 0:17:42.000
<v Speaker 1>advanced China is getting on a lot of things. And

0:17:42.080 --> 0:17:44.520
<v Speaker 1>they are very clear about their mission, their long term

0:17:44.600 --> 0:17:48.040
<v Speaker 1>planning to be much more advanced on a lot of

0:17:48.080 --> 0:17:52.080
<v Speaker 1>sophisticated areas and industries. It's it's a really good question.

0:17:52.160 --> 0:17:55.400
<v Speaker 1>And and and maybe it's because there wasn't this one

0:17:55.760 --> 0:17:59.639
<v Speaker 1>big dramatic event, like you know, the launch of Spotnik

0:17:59.720 --> 0:18:03.959
<v Speaker 1>that this has really crept up on on America. I mean,

0:18:04.000 --> 0:18:06.359
<v Speaker 1>I lived there for for more than twenty years, and

0:18:06.760 --> 0:18:08.480
<v Speaker 1>and so this happened. I mean, the build out of

0:18:08.520 --> 0:18:11.719
<v Speaker 1>their high speed rail network was phenomenal. I mean they

0:18:11.800 --> 0:18:15.120
<v Speaker 1>now have the most extensive high speed network in the world.

0:18:15.119 --> 0:18:16.920
<v Speaker 1>In fact, it's it's longer than the rest of the

0:18:16.960 --> 0:18:19.680
<v Speaker 1>world's network combined. And by the way, it's about to

0:18:19.840 --> 0:18:22.399
<v Speaker 1>double a game by two thousand and and and and

0:18:22.560 --> 0:18:25.960
<v Speaker 1>thirty five. And all of this was accomplished in a decade.

0:18:26.080 --> 0:18:28.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, I mean, Joe Biden was was talking to

0:18:28.080 --> 0:18:30.040
<v Speaker 1>senators the other day and was saying, you know, we

0:18:30.200 --> 0:18:33.160
<v Speaker 1>we need to pay attention to to China's railway network.

0:18:33.240 --> 0:18:35.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, well, yes, you know. He's He's a guy

0:18:35.240 --> 0:18:38.760
<v Speaker 1>that used to travel every day on a train track,

0:18:38.880 --> 0:18:41.679
<v Speaker 1>Joe between Delaware and Washington, d C. It took him

0:18:41.760 --> 0:18:44.359
<v Speaker 1>ninety minutes. If it sat on a similar lengths Traine,

0:18:44.640 --> 0:18:46.640
<v Speaker 1>it was about a hundred miles hundred miles in China.

0:18:46.680 --> 0:18:48.240
<v Speaker 1>You do that in half the time. You do it

0:18:48.880 --> 0:18:52.080
<v Speaker 1>minutes and and and it works like clockwork. Hey, Andy,

0:18:52.119 --> 0:18:54.159
<v Speaker 1>I was in Changhai a couple of years ago with

0:18:54.480 --> 0:18:57.600
<v Speaker 1>graduate school classmates, and we were there on a school

0:18:57.640 --> 0:19:00.919
<v Speaker 1>trip and some classmates of mine went to buy something

0:19:01.040 --> 0:19:03.239
<v Speaker 1>in the mall that was close to our hotel. They

0:19:03.280 --> 0:19:06.480
<v Speaker 1>had cash and credit cards, they couldn't buy something because

0:19:06.520 --> 0:19:09.560
<v Speaker 1>they didn't hadn't downloaded the app that so many people

0:19:09.680 --> 0:19:11.879
<v Speaker 1>in China used to actually pay for something so they

0:19:12.040 --> 0:19:15.680
<v Speaker 1>end up coming back empty handed. What's China doing by

0:19:15.720 --> 0:19:20.639
<v Speaker 1>eliminating cash? Right? So? Well, yeah, exactly. So for a

0:19:20.720 --> 0:19:24.359
<v Speaker 1>long time, basically there was no need uh to carry

0:19:24.520 --> 0:19:26.119
<v Speaker 1>cash at all when I when I would go out

0:19:26.160 --> 0:19:28.080
<v Speaker 1>in Shanghai. I mean, it didn't tell to me to

0:19:28.920 --> 0:19:30.720
<v Speaker 1>get to take notes. I mean you, of course you

0:19:30.880 --> 0:19:33.800
<v Speaker 1>it's everything is swiping your bar code, whatever, whatever it

0:19:33.920 --> 0:19:37.240
<v Speaker 1>is you're you're you're buying. What they're now doing is

0:19:37.400 --> 0:19:41.800
<v Speaker 1>launching and in a digital currency. They're going to do

0:19:41.920 --> 0:19:46.000
<v Speaker 1>away with notes all together. And China invented the banknote,

0:19:46.040 --> 0:19:48.920
<v Speaker 1>by the way, about fifteen hundred years ago. It was

0:19:48.960 --> 0:19:51.399
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that Marco Polo marveled about when

0:19:51.440 --> 0:19:53.600
<v Speaker 1>he traveled to China in the thirteenth century. They're going

0:19:53.680 --> 0:19:55.239
<v Speaker 1>to get rid of notes, are going to get rid

0:19:55.240 --> 0:19:59.240
<v Speaker 1>of coins. It's going to be a digital currency. And not,

0:19:59.440 --> 0:20:02.320
<v Speaker 1>by the way, at the bitcoin that that we we've

0:20:02.320 --> 0:20:04.440
<v Speaker 1>been hearing about today. I mean, this is this is

0:20:04.520 --> 0:20:08.720
<v Speaker 1>not your distributed ledger, your anonymous transaction. This is a

0:20:09.040 --> 0:20:12.840
<v Speaker 1>central bank issued currency which is going to give the

0:20:12.920 --> 0:20:19.320
<v Speaker 1>central absolute visibility into every transaction in China, every donation,

0:20:19.960 --> 0:20:23.199
<v Speaker 1>every trade. The state is going to be in your wallet.

0:20:23.280 --> 0:20:25.679
<v Speaker 1>This's this big brother like you've never had it before.

0:20:26.080 --> 0:20:28.960
<v Speaker 1>It's fascinating. And what's interesting is I feel like China

0:20:28.960 --> 0:20:31.680
<v Speaker 1>always wants to be much more part of kind of

0:20:31.960 --> 0:20:34.960
<v Speaker 1>the system, but I feel like this will seclude them potentially. Andy,

0:20:35.000 --> 0:20:37.680
<v Speaker 1>and just got about twenty five seconds. Yeah, they wanted

0:20:37.920 --> 0:20:39.840
<v Speaker 1>they of course, they want to displace the dollar. They

0:20:39.880 --> 0:20:42.000
<v Speaker 1>want to have a global currency. Nobody wants to use

0:20:42.000 --> 0:20:45.119
<v Speaker 1>a digital currency overseas with with with the knowledge that

0:20:45.240 --> 0:20:49.480
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese state has absolute visibility as eyes on it,

0:20:49.600 --> 0:20:51.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't think so. I mean, so it'll work in China,

0:20:52.080 --> 0:20:55.680
<v Speaker 1>but the internationally highly doubtful. It's fascinating. I want to

0:20:55.680 --> 0:20:58.680
<v Speaker 1>do more on this. I love this story, and uh Andy,

0:20:58.760 --> 0:21:01.040
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much. Really appreciate at it. Andy Brown

0:21:01.119 --> 0:21:04.200
<v Speaker 1>he is Bloomberg New Economy Editorial Director. Check out his

0:21:04.400 --> 0:21:06.600
<v Speaker 1>columns on The Bloomberg and at Bloomberg dot Com. We

0:21:06.640 --> 0:21:08.880
<v Speaker 1>have to talk more about this one because I think, um,

0:21:09.480 --> 0:21:11.680
<v Speaker 1>that's a big deal. Yeah, it's a huge deal. That

0:21:11.760 --> 0:21:14.879
<v Speaker 1>kind of access by the government is amazing. This is

0:21:14.960 --> 0:21:18.880
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Messer and Bloomberg Quick Takes.

0:21:19.000 --> 0:21:22.320
<v Speaker 1>Tim Stinovich from Bloomberg Radio. Tim, I have to say

0:21:22.359 --> 0:21:24.080
<v Speaker 1>when I read this story over the weekend, the pictures,

0:21:24.119 --> 0:21:25.879
<v Speaker 1>I had to look at them several times for it

0:21:26.000 --> 0:21:29.160
<v Speaker 1>to register about what had happened. Everybody saw that video.

0:21:29.240 --> 0:21:31.600
<v Speaker 1>I feel like at this point of the engine on

0:21:31.760 --> 0:21:35.240
<v Speaker 1>the Boeing Triple seven on fire just minutes after taking

0:21:35.280 --> 0:21:38.760
<v Speaker 1>off from Denver International Airport, right and then pieces of

0:21:38.920 --> 0:21:42.040
<v Speaker 1>it just in someone's yard, like it was just crazy.

0:21:42.160 --> 0:21:44.440
<v Speaker 1>So let's get into it and find out what's the

0:21:44.520 --> 0:21:46.959
<v Speaker 1>latest and what's going on. Let's get the latest from

0:21:47.000 --> 0:21:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Julie Johnson Aerospace Report at Bloomberg News joining us from Chicago.

0:21:50.000 --> 0:21:51.560
<v Speaker 1>And I want to mention that Boeing shares I know

0:21:51.680 --> 0:21:54.480
<v Speaker 1>we're hired earlier. And I'll take a look at the

0:21:54.560 --> 0:21:57.720
<v Speaker 1>trade raytheon though was seeing some pressure raytheon of course,

0:21:57.760 --> 0:22:00.080
<v Speaker 1>the owner of Pratt and Whitney, Julie, good to have

0:22:00.200 --> 0:22:03.400
<v Speaker 1>you here. So where are we on this story. Well,

0:22:04.840 --> 0:22:08.920
<v Speaker 1>the investigators are starting, you know, to dig into the

0:22:09.359 --> 0:22:14.520
<v Speaker 1>root causes of this and the Triple seven jets around

0:22:14.520 --> 0:22:17.359
<v Speaker 1>the world, and there weren't that many of them that

0:22:17.520 --> 0:22:21.600
<v Speaker 1>had this particular engine on them are are all grounded

0:22:21.720 --> 0:22:25.600
<v Speaker 1>right now, and crews are taking a close look at

0:22:25.640 --> 0:22:28.960
<v Speaker 1>the engines to see if there are other cracking issues.

0:22:29.960 --> 0:22:33.920
<v Speaker 1>How long do you anticipate some type of investigation such

0:22:33.960 --> 0:22:36.320
<v Speaker 1>as this lasts. When will there be some sort of

0:22:36.359 --> 0:22:39.440
<v Speaker 1>answer as to the cause of this engine failure and

0:22:40.240 --> 0:22:44.520
<v Speaker 1>other scares in the past. Oh, you know, that's that's

0:22:44.560 --> 0:22:48.840
<v Speaker 1>really good question. And these um, you know, these investigations

0:22:49.160 --> 0:22:52.840
<v Speaker 1>tend to take a long time. Uh. The f A

0:22:53.400 --> 0:22:57.920
<v Speaker 1>is just super thorough about you know, examining causes and

0:22:58.640 --> 0:23:00.679
<v Speaker 1>and you know I should just add that right now,

0:23:00.800 --> 0:23:04.640
<v Speaker 1>it's very early on UM so it it looks bad

0:23:04.920 --> 0:23:08.959
<v Speaker 1>because there have been a couple of very similar incidents

0:23:09.920 --> 0:23:15.080
<v Speaker 1>with this engine and these really old, very early Triple

0:23:15.160 --> 0:23:20.200
<v Speaker 1>seven models. UM. But yeah, it's early days, early days,

0:23:20.280 --> 0:23:23.840
<v Speaker 1>So stay tuned. Basically, I mean, what are we waiting

0:23:23.920 --> 0:23:27.960
<v Speaker 1>for now, Like what happens next? Well, I think, um,

0:23:28.640 --> 0:23:31.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, we'll we'll have to see, um, you know,

0:23:31.640 --> 0:23:33.560
<v Speaker 1>we'll have to wait for more details to come out

0:23:33.640 --> 0:23:36.840
<v Speaker 1>from the f A A and from Pratt and Whitney,

0:23:36.920 --> 0:23:41.160
<v Speaker 1>which is you know, the raytheon Um subsidiary that made

0:23:41.200 --> 0:23:47.840
<v Speaker 1>the engines and um, and so I don't know if

0:23:47.920 --> 0:23:51.159
<v Speaker 1>you you know how how deep you got into the

0:23:51.280 --> 0:23:54.840
<v Speaker 1>rabbit hole with us. I. You know, I spent a

0:23:55.240 --> 0:23:58.560
<v Speaker 1>huge chunk of my weekend on Twitter looking at you know,

0:23:59.200 --> 0:24:02.960
<v Speaker 1>photos and videos, and what became apparent very early on

0:24:03.880 --> 0:24:08.040
<v Speaker 1>was that two fan blades had broken off, and Um,

0:24:08.480 --> 0:24:10.920
<v Speaker 1>so I think the FAA is going to take a

0:24:11.040 --> 0:24:16.360
<v Speaker 1>really long, hard look at the way that these blades

0:24:16.520 --> 0:24:21.440
<v Speaker 1>are inspected, and um and so Pratt and you know,

0:24:21.520 --> 0:24:24.359
<v Speaker 1>mechanics around the world need to get into, you know,

0:24:24.520 --> 0:24:28.040
<v Speaker 1>the grain of the metal to look for very early

0:24:28.240 --> 0:24:31.320
<v Speaker 1>signs of fatigue that aren't visible to the human eye.

0:24:31.560 --> 0:24:35.560
<v Speaker 1>They use ultrasonic tools for this. It has been a

0:24:35.960 --> 0:24:39.480
<v Speaker 1>very bad few years for Boeing, to to put it mildly,

0:24:39.720 --> 0:24:44.000
<v Speaker 1>with the seven thirty seven Max disaster the subsequent grounding

0:24:44.400 --> 0:24:47.320
<v Speaker 1>of those planes. Um, what does this mean for Boeing

0:24:47.359 --> 0:24:50.600
<v Speaker 1>given that it's actually a relatively small number of planes

0:24:50.680 --> 0:24:52.800
<v Speaker 1>that are affected and seems to be less of an

0:24:52.840 --> 0:24:55.359
<v Speaker 1>issue with the plane and more of an issue with

0:24:55.560 --> 0:24:59.200
<v Speaker 1>the Pratt and Whitney engine. Yes, and I think that's

0:24:59.240 --> 0:25:01.520
<v Speaker 1>one of the reason that's why we saw Boeing sell

0:25:01.600 --> 0:25:04.520
<v Speaker 1>off this morning, and then the market sort of take

0:25:04.720 --> 0:25:07.480
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of a you know, a deep breath

0:25:08.400 --> 0:25:11.439
<v Speaker 1>and so right now, I mean, this does not help Bowing.

0:25:11.800 --> 0:25:15.399
<v Speaker 1>This really this is not great for their reputations that

0:25:15.680 --> 0:25:21.800
<v Speaker 1>the optics are horrendous. But in terms of financial liability,

0:25:22.960 --> 0:25:25.719
<v Speaker 1>at this moment, it doesn't look like this is going

0:25:25.760 --> 0:25:28.840
<v Speaker 1>to be an issue for Boeing and UM we're you know,

0:25:28.960 --> 0:25:32.440
<v Speaker 1>we're talking a very small percentage of the global fleet

0:25:32.600 --> 0:25:37.040
<v Speaker 1>that's affected. And for Pratt, I've seen estimates that maybe

0:25:37.680 --> 0:25:41.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's a few few cents of earnings potentially clipped.

0:25:42.080 --> 0:25:45.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, but bottom line, Julie and I should just update.

0:25:45.640 --> 0:25:49.639
<v Speaker 1>Boeing had traded up about one it's now down about

0:25:49.640 --> 0:25:53.159
<v Speaker 1>one point four percent, and shares of raytheon owner of

0:25:53.200 --> 0:25:56.280
<v Speaker 1>pret and Whitney or down just under one percent. Um

0:25:56.640 --> 0:25:59.879
<v Speaker 1>Who ultimately is responsible though? Is it United and the

0:26:00.000 --> 0:26:03.240
<v Speaker 1>Air Force for checking on the planes? I'm just trying

0:26:03.280 --> 0:26:05.440
<v Speaker 1>to figure out where the fault might lie. Yeah, and

0:26:05.520 --> 0:26:08.200
<v Speaker 1>that's going to be a great question for the you know,

0:26:08.359 --> 0:26:09.840
<v Speaker 1>for the F A A and N T S B

0:26:10.040 --> 0:26:14.240
<v Speaker 1>as well. Now, I'm I don't know if you'll remember,

0:26:14.320 --> 0:26:18.160
<v Speaker 1>but back in another United jet was on its way

0:26:18.200 --> 0:26:21.560
<v Speaker 1>to Hawaii and had just that, you know, as engine

0:26:21.600 --> 0:26:27.200
<v Speaker 1>explode on the wing, and um, and so the root

0:26:27.320 --> 0:26:30.080
<v Speaker 1>cause looks to have been quite similar to what happened

0:26:30.119 --> 0:26:34.399
<v Speaker 1>on Saturday, and Pratt at that point was was asked

0:26:34.400 --> 0:26:37.320
<v Speaker 1>by the f A to go in and inspect all

0:26:37.400 --> 0:26:42.000
<v Speaker 1>of the fan blades um on this particular type of engine.

0:26:42.840 --> 0:26:47.399
<v Speaker 1>And so in very short order, um, we had a

0:26:47.600 --> 0:26:51.000
<v Speaker 1>japan Airlines jet have an engine failure in December that

0:26:51.160 --> 0:26:54.560
<v Speaker 1>was like this in the United plane on Saturday. So

0:26:55.119 --> 0:26:57.240
<v Speaker 1>so um, I think the f A is going to

0:26:57.280 --> 0:27:00.639
<v Speaker 1>be taking a close look at how Pratt but measure

0:27:00.800 --> 0:27:03.720
<v Speaker 1>the damage. All right, We appreciate it, Julie, Thank you

0:27:03.800 --> 0:27:07.119
<v Speaker 1>so much. Julie Johnson, Aerospace report at Bloomberg News on

0:27:07.280 --> 0:27:09.560
<v Speaker 1>the phone from Chicago's I mentioned bowing down about one

0:27:09.560 --> 0:27:13.480
<v Speaker 1>point four percent, raytheon down just under one percent? Is it? Well? What? Well,

0:27:13.640 --> 0:27:15.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's it's so interesting. These planes are designed

0:27:15.600 --> 0:27:17.920
<v Speaker 1>to fly on one engine, but as Alan Levin told

0:27:18.000 --> 0:27:20.280
<v Speaker 1>us on Quick Take earlier today, not when it's the

0:27:20.520 --> 0:27:29.159
<v Speaker 1>aerodynamics change so so significantly. Yeah, exactly, I'm bro Mac Journal.

0:27:30.240 --> 0:27:32.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah but you let me drive? Oh no, no, no, no,

0:27:32.560 --> 0:27:36.880
<v Speaker 1>who's going to drug home? Please? I'll do the riding gravel.

0:27:37.640 --> 0:27:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Lets me. I want to drive, Just drive baby the

0:27:45.800 --> 0:27:56.920
<v Speaker 1>question trying. This is the drive to the Globe community. Thanks,

0:27:56.960 --> 0:28:00.600
<v Speaker 1>we'll dry up. Ja Don on Bloomberg Radio. All right, folks,

0:28:00.680 --> 0:28:03.480
<v Speaker 1>just spent eleven minutes left in today's trading session. Let's

0:28:03.480 --> 0:28:05.440
<v Speaker 1>get to the drive to the close. James chock Mark

0:28:05.600 --> 0:28:08.240
<v Speaker 1>is back with US, partner and portfolio analyst. He focuses

0:28:08.280 --> 0:28:11.199
<v Speaker 1>on tech Stox. He knows this area so well at

0:28:11.240 --> 0:28:13.920
<v Speaker 1>the asset management firm Clockwise Capital, joining us on the

0:28:13.960 --> 0:28:18.720
<v Speaker 1>phone from Miami. So is it warm in Miami? It's

0:28:18.720 --> 0:28:22.520
<v Speaker 1>a bit chilly today about Come on? That really hurts.

0:28:23.640 --> 0:28:25.920
<v Speaker 1>You're a former New Yorker, you know you gotta miss

0:28:25.960 --> 0:28:30.320
<v Speaker 1>the February. Yeah, I don't know what winter is like.

0:28:31.320 --> 0:28:34.440
<v Speaker 1>We had snow earlier. I'll be back. I'll be back,

0:28:34.560 --> 0:28:37.720
<v Speaker 1>all right. So, um, how are you and how do

0:28:37.760 --> 0:28:40.520
<v Speaker 1>you think the technology areas doing? We saw a little

0:28:40.520 --> 0:28:44.240
<v Speaker 1>bit of a pullback, some concerns once again, valuation talk.

0:28:44.320 --> 0:28:49.400
<v Speaker 1>How do you see it? However? Priced? Are we uh? Slightly? Um?

0:28:49.640 --> 0:28:53.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, we anticipated you know, somewhat of a five

0:28:53.240 --> 0:28:56.560
<v Speaker 1>to ten percent pulled back. Um, you know going in

0:28:57.120 --> 0:29:00.560
<v Speaker 1>the recent kind of lows that we've seen. So we

0:29:00.720 --> 0:29:02.960
<v Speaker 1>have been raising cash, you know, in our fund to

0:29:03.280 --> 0:29:07.040
<v Speaker 1>take advantage of any pullbacks that we do see. Because

0:29:07.120 --> 0:29:08.920
<v Speaker 1>right now, if you look at the border markets trading

0:29:08.920 --> 0:29:13.000
<v Speaker 1>about twenty three times earnings fore, you know, which is

0:29:13.200 --> 0:29:16.200
<v Speaker 1>a little lofty by historical standards, but kind of the

0:29:16.200 --> 0:29:18.160
<v Speaker 1>way we look at the border tech sector, you know,

0:29:18.240 --> 0:29:21.640
<v Speaker 1>we still want to be heavily invested because these companies

0:29:22.320 --> 0:29:25.640
<v Speaker 1>have market opportunities far bigger than we ever had before.

0:29:26.080 --> 0:29:30.720
<v Speaker 1>They don't have the barriers on geography, on infrastructure and

0:29:31.040 --> 0:29:34.920
<v Speaker 1>ability to reach consumers, and and those bigger opportunities should

0:29:34.960 --> 0:29:37.560
<v Speaker 1>yield bigger returns as we look out over the next

0:29:37.600 --> 0:29:40.720
<v Speaker 1>couple of years. So we're going to be tactical and

0:29:41.080 --> 0:29:44.520
<v Speaker 1>surgical and opportunistic on pullbacks. On the names was like,

0:29:45.080 --> 0:29:47.040
<v Speaker 1>when do you think there will be a pullback, James?

0:29:47.080 --> 0:29:49.280
<v Speaker 1>And and once there is one and you can deploy

0:29:49.360 --> 0:29:52.880
<v Speaker 1>that cash, where is it going to go? Well, we're

0:29:52.920 --> 0:29:55.440
<v Speaker 1>already seeing it, right, I mean, the nastack was what

0:29:55.760 --> 0:29:58.040
<v Speaker 1>down two percent today to an after percent? You know,

0:29:58.320 --> 0:30:00.880
<v Speaker 1>that's not a little you know, So I think we're

0:30:00.960 --> 0:30:02.920
<v Speaker 1>chipping away at it. I don't. We don't think it's

0:30:02.960 --> 0:30:05.960
<v Speaker 1>going to be a prolonged one um because of the

0:30:06.040 --> 0:30:08.320
<v Speaker 1>fact that or it's going to be any degree of

0:30:08.440 --> 0:30:11.400
<v Speaker 1>severity with what we saw last year because of the

0:30:11.480 --> 0:30:14.200
<v Speaker 1>fact that you know, these are real companies with real learnings. Yes,

0:30:14.520 --> 0:30:17.960
<v Speaker 1>some of the valuations are high, but at the same time,

0:30:18.080 --> 0:30:20.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, these are the fastest growing companies that we've

0:30:20.920 --> 0:30:23.760
<v Speaker 1>seen and you can grow into their evaluation and on

0:30:23.840 --> 0:30:27.000
<v Speaker 1>the relatively quick uh period we think and as far

0:30:27.080 --> 0:30:29.080
<v Speaker 1>as where we're putting our money kind of we put

0:30:29.120 --> 0:30:31.719
<v Speaker 1>it in three buckets. One is what is the absolutely

0:30:31.840 --> 0:30:35.520
<v Speaker 1>essential infrastructure? Those are companies like Amazon and Apple. What

0:30:35.680 --> 0:30:39.000
<v Speaker 1>are the fastest growing companies that are leveraging the cloud

0:30:39.080 --> 0:30:41.920
<v Speaker 1>and that infrastructure. You know, that's company like syntech, like

0:30:42.080 --> 0:30:45.440
<v Speaker 1>Square and a firm you also like the companies more

0:30:45.680 --> 0:30:49.040
<v Speaker 1>established ones like Nvidia. And then you have third bucket,

0:30:49.120 --> 0:30:52.000
<v Speaker 1>which is which are the legacy companies that can benefit

0:30:52.160 --> 0:30:56.720
<v Speaker 1>from added productivity and they're manufacturing and and really taking

0:30:56.720 --> 0:30:59.880
<v Speaker 1>advantage of right sizing. The companies after COVID. You know,

0:31:00.040 --> 0:31:05.880
<v Speaker 1>those are companies like llpool. It's world Pool, mhm, world Pool.

0:31:07.080 --> 0:31:12.000
<v Speaker 1>So it's it's not a traditional you know, tech stock um,

0:31:12.080 --> 0:31:14.880
<v Speaker 1>but you know what we're looking for in that third

0:31:14.960 --> 0:31:19.040
<v Speaker 1>bucket is company the legacy companies that have the opportunity

0:31:19.600 --> 0:31:25.200
<v Speaker 1>to improve their productivity through improving their manufacturing crepibility and

0:31:25.320 --> 0:31:27.800
<v Speaker 1>also coming out of COVID in a much better margin

0:31:27.880 --> 0:31:30.280
<v Speaker 1>profile than Fire. Well, it's interesting because we actually talked

0:31:30.320 --> 0:31:32.000
<v Speaker 1>to the World Pool CEO a few months ago, and

0:31:32.160 --> 0:31:34.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, we talked a lot about consumer habits and

0:31:34.520 --> 0:31:37.640
<v Speaker 1>how you know, his thinking is like, listen, things are

0:31:37.680 --> 0:31:40.200
<v Speaker 1>not going to change. Consumers are not going to change

0:31:40.240 --> 0:31:42.560
<v Speaker 1>what they've been doing for the last year overnight and

0:31:42.640 --> 0:31:45.720
<v Speaker 1>maybe not forever, you know, in terms of the focus

0:31:45.800 --> 0:31:47.800
<v Speaker 1>on home and so on and so forth. So um,

0:31:48.400 --> 0:31:50.080
<v Speaker 1>it was interesting, and I wonder how much of that

0:31:50.720 --> 0:31:52.520
<v Speaker 1>goes into your thinking about some of the names that

0:31:52.560 --> 0:31:56.160
<v Speaker 1>you want to invest in right now. A lot, because

0:31:56.240 --> 0:31:59.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we really think that we will not go

0:31:59.200 --> 0:32:01.480
<v Speaker 1>back to the way things work. And that's the way

0:32:01.800 --> 0:32:04.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of we're looking at the world right now because

0:32:04.440 --> 0:32:08.560
<v Speaker 1>what companies have noticed is and and and employees and

0:32:08.920 --> 0:32:12.040
<v Speaker 1>people in general have noticed that life does go on

0:32:12.360 --> 0:32:15.040
<v Speaker 1>without having to go into the office every single day,

0:32:15.800 --> 0:32:18.600
<v Speaker 1>and and businesses are able to move forward and able

0:32:18.640 --> 0:32:22.720
<v Speaker 1>to do so in a much more um profitable manner.

0:32:22.880 --> 0:32:24.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, when you don't have to say, is on

0:32:24.440 --> 0:32:27.400
<v Speaker 1>office space and whatnot and being able to hire people

0:32:27.480 --> 0:32:30.440
<v Speaker 1>from around the country. Um, if you're not limited to

0:32:30.520 --> 0:32:34.760
<v Speaker 1>geography and and um kind of fixed costs, you know,

0:32:35.200 --> 0:32:37.600
<v Speaker 1>you can still continue to grow your business and potentially

0:32:37.640 --> 0:32:40.080
<v Speaker 1>even get more productivity out of your people since you

0:32:40.160 --> 0:32:42.720
<v Speaker 1>don't have to commute and things of that nature. So,

0:32:43.280 --> 0:32:44.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, we think that we will not go back

0:32:44.960 --> 0:32:47.720
<v Speaker 1>to the way things were. So which companies will allow you,

0:32:48.560 --> 0:32:51.920
<v Speaker 1>uh to help as a company as an individual to

0:32:52.040 --> 0:32:55.239
<v Speaker 1>better navigate this this new life, you know, coming out

0:32:55.320 --> 0:32:58.320
<v Speaker 1>of the pandemic, And we certainly think about businesses that

0:32:58.440 --> 0:33:00.760
<v Speaker 1>we invest in that way. Hey, James, what do you

0:33:00.800 --> 0:33:03.960
<v Speaker 1>think of of Snap the company hitting a hundred billion

0:33:03.960 --> 0:33:07.680
<v Speaker 1>dollars in market value? It's doubled in in four months.

0:33:07.680 --> 0:33:09.239
<v Speaker 1>I know this is a company that you followed very

0:33:09.280 --> 0:33:11.400
<v Speaker 1>closely for years. What do you think of how it's

0:33:11.440 --> 0:33:15.640
<v Speaker 1>doing right now? It's remarkable. I mean, they've they've come

0:33:15.760 --> 0:33:17.960
<v Speaker 1>such a long way. And then you know, initially I

0:33:18.080 --> 0:33:20.720
<v Speaker 1>came out positive on the company when I was on

0:33:21.000 --> 0:33:24.520
<v Speaker 1>the cuth side giving recommendations on these docks, but um,

0:33:24.680 --> 0:33:26.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, it took a while for them to gain

0:33:26.520 --> 0:33:29.280
<v Speaker 1>their traction and obviously you had Facebook company with them,

0:33:29.560 --> 0:33:31.800
<v Speaker 1>but at the end of the day, the whole case

0:33:31.960 --> 0:33:36.719
<v Speaker 1>behind it, and including companies like Interest and whatnot, but UM,

0:33:37.040 --> 0:33:40.000
<v Speaker 1>the case behind it was that you can there's two

0:33:40.040 --> 0:33:42.440
<v Speaker 1>ways to monetize that advertising. You know, you can either

0:33:42.520 --> 0:33:44.680
<v Speaker 1>go super broad with a lot of users and do

0:33:44.800 --> 0:33:47.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of campaigns like that, or you can have

0:33:48.000 --> 0:33:52.000
<v Speaker 1>a niche product with a very very higher engagement rate

0:33:52.400 --> 0:33:56.240
<v Speaker 1>and monetize investments. And that was the direction that's Snap went.

0:33:56.840 --> 0:33:59.080
<v Speaker 1>And you know, they have a they have a good

0:33:59.160 --> 0:34:02.200
<v Speaker 1>user base of grown a user based and and covid

0:34:02.240 --> 0:34:06.680
<v Speaker 1>has also benefited UM then UM from that standpoint, and

0:34:07.320 --> 0:34:08.880
<v Speaker 1>because of the R O I s and are improving

0:34:08.920 --> 0:34:11.839
<v Speaker 1>on the tech platform at platforms. You know that that's

0:34:11.840 --> 0:34:14.719
<v Speaker 1>a company that has certainly sezed on the opportunity that

0:34:14.800 --> 0:34:17.880
<v Speaker 1>they originally had. Following the I P O I got

0:34:17.920 --> 0:34:19.600
<v Speaker 1>two questions and I only have time for once. I'm

0:34:19.640 --> 0:34:21.960
<v Speaker 1>just gonna go with it. We've got the twileto CFO

0:34:22.200 --> 0:34:24.680
<v Speaker 1>coming on later on. This stock has been on a

0:34:24.800 --> 0:34:27.840
<v Speaker 1>tear this year last year. Thirty seconds, what would you

0:34:27.880 --> 0:34:34.919
<v Speaker 1>ask him? UM? I would ask him on the let's

0:34:34.920 --> 0:34:37.680
<v Speaker 1>see on the kind of the analytics and then the

0:34:37.800 --> 0:34:40.719
<v Speaker 1>customer relationship management fronts kind of you know, they made

0:34:40.760 --> 0:34:45.520
<v Speaker 1>some acquisitions to boost UH in that regard beyond just

0:34:45.719 --> 0:34:48.960
<v Speaker 1>their communication capabilities, but also how do I improve the

0:34:49.000 --> 0:34:53.719
<v Speaker 1>productivity in house? UM, and for for the companies that

0:34:53.960 --> 0:34:56.560
<v Speaker 1>are their customers and being able to interact with their

0:34:56.560 --> 0:34:59.200
<v Speaker 1>customers and be smarter about how they interact with the

0:34:59.480 --> 0:35:03.640
<v Speaker 1>customers before. How are they helping their customers leverage the data?

0:35:03.880 --> 0:35:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Cool stuff. UM, I'll tell you the next question, the

0:35:06.920 --> 0:35:09.200
<v Speaker 1>second question next time. When you come back, you gotta

0:35:09.239 --> 0:35:12.520
<v Speaker 1>come back. James, stay warm, enjoy. James Chock Mock partner

0:35:12.560 --> 0:35:14.879
<v Speaker 1>and technology analyst O our Clockwise Capital, on the phone

0:35:14.920 --> 0:35:19.640
<v Speaker 1>from a seventy degrees warmy Bommy with Miami. I'm a

0:35:19.719 --> 0:35:25.720
<v Speaker 1>little bitter. Thanks for listening to Bloomberg Business Week. Download

0:35:25.719 --> 0:35:29.000
<v Speaker 1>the podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot com, and

0:35:29.080 --> 0:35:30.759
<v Speaker 1>you can also listen to our radio show at two

0:35:30.800 --> 0:35:33.680
<v Speaker 1>pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio or watch us on YouTube.

0:35:33.840 --> 0:35:35.279
<v Speaker 1>Search to Bloomberg Global News