WEBVTT - DOJ's Apple Lawsuit and the IPO Ecosystem

0:00:02.600 --> 0:00:09.120
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news, from.

0:00:09.000 --> 0:00:13.080
<v Speaker 2>The heart where innovations, money and power, Collie in Silicon

0:00:13.200 --> 0:00:14.160
<v Speaker 2>Valley and beyond.

0:00:14.400 --> 0:00:18.440
<v Speaker 3>This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and Ed Ludlow.

0:00:32.280 --> 0:00:35.280
<v Speaker 4>I'm Caroline Heidet Bloomberg's World headquarters in New York, and

0:00:35.360 --> 0:00:35.840
<v Speaker 4>I met.

0:00:35.680 --> 0:00:40.040
<v Speaker 5>Lover in San Francisco. Happy Friday. This is Bloomberg Technology Long.

0:00:39.880 --> 0:00:40.559
<v Speaker 6>Week coming up.

0:00:40.600 --> 0:00:43.040
<v Speaker 4>We'll discuss the regulatory overhang for Apple, I mean the

0:00:43.159 --> 0:00:46.560
<v Speaker 4>Justice Department's sweeping lawsuit against the iPhone maker.

0:00:46.600 --> 0:00:49.040
<v Speaker 6>Full analysis ahead, Plus we'll.

0:00:48.880 --> 0:00:51.800
<v Speaker 5>Get to read on the IPO ecosystem after a Steri

0:00:51.880 --> 0:00:56.240
<v Speaker 5>Labs and Reddit went public this week with strong debuts.

0:00:56.200 --> 0:00:57.560
<v Speaker 6>And talking of the big week.

0:00:57.600 --> 0:00:59.760
<v Speaker 4>Bitcoin actually set for one of his worst weeks of

0:00:59.760 --> 0:01:01.800
<v Speaker 4>the year, as ETF demand that slows.

0:01:02.000 --> 0:01:04.759
<v Speaker 6>We'll discuss that and so much more throughout this hour.

0:01:04.800 --> 0:01:09.800
<v Speaker 5>Of Apple doj antitrust lawsuit against them and on Thursday

0:01:09.920 --> 0:01:13.319
<v Speaker 5>session it had a real material impact on the stock.

0:01:13.680 --> 0:01:16.240
<v Speaker 5>You can see actually we're sort of recovering up four

0:01:16.240 --> 0:01:18.800
<v Speaker 5>ten to percent in the session, but I still think

0:01:18.840 --> 0:01:21.679
<v Speaker 5>it was notable that finally there was a headline about

0:01:21.680 --> 0:01:24.639
<v Speaker 5>antitrust relating to Apple, and there was a clear stock

0:01:24.680 --> 0:01:28.280
<v Speaker 5>reaction in that session Thursday. What happens next is the

0:01:28.280 --> 0:01:31.199
<v Speaker 5>big question from all. Let's bring in Bloomberg's Mark German,

0:01:31.280 --> 0:01:35.319
<v Speaker 5>chief correspondent covering Apple. What's changed in the last twenty

0:01:35.319 --> 0:01:37.160
<v Speaker 5>four hours since we last spoke. Do we have any

0:01:37.160 --> 0:01:40.280
<v Speaker 5>signals from how Apple's going to respond to this suit?

0:01:40.720 --> 0:01:43.399
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? I think reading through the lawsuit reveals a lot.

0:01:43.520 --> 0:01:47.000
<v Speaker 3>It reveals that the Department of Justice had been working

0:01:47.040 --> 0:01:50.000
<v Speaker 3>on the case for so long that I would say

0:01:50.040 --> 0:01:53.600
<v Speaker 3>about sixty to seventy percent of their major points are

0:01:53.680 --> 0:01:58.040
<v Speaker 3>things that have already been resolved. Apple doesn't believe, of course,

0:01:58.240 --> 0:02:01.280
<v Speaker 3>they would say this that the case holds much water.

0:02:01.400 --> 0:02:04.680
<v Speaker 3>They don't believe that they're a monopoly. They seem to

0:02:04.720 --> 0:02:08.200
<v Speaker 3>find it perplexing that the government is trying to position

0:02:08.240 --> 0:02:10.919
<v Speaker 3>them a monopoly, whereas they believe they only have about

0:02:10.960 --> 0:02:15.639
<v Speaker 3>twenty percent global smartphone market share. I think that Apple

0:02:15.720 --> 0:02:18.400
<v Speaker 3>is prepared for a fight here. I doubt they're going

0:02:18.480 --> 0:02:21.280
<v Speaker 3>to settle. They've settled in some cases, but I don't

0:02:21.320 --> 0:02:24.400
<v Speaker 3>think that Tim Cook has shown a willingness to settle.

0:02:24.480 --> 0:02:28.360
<v Speaker 3>I think Apple believes and based on my read of

0:02:28.360 --> 0:02:32.680
<v Speaker 3>the lawsuit, I'm not seeing much harm towards consumers. I'm

0:02:32.720 --> 0:02:36.120
<v Speaker 3>seeing a lot of harm towards developers. I'm seeing harm

0:02:36.200 --> 0:02:41.120
<v Speaker 3>towards partners and some rivals. But again, here are their

0:02:41.200 --> 0:02:44.360
<v Speaker 3>top five issues the Department of Justice. A lack of

0:02:44.520 --> 0:02:49.520
<v Speaker 3>cloud gaming support, allowed of message interoperability, a lack of

0:02:49.720 --> 0:02:53.240
<v Speaker 3>super apps, which are things like we Chat, a lack

0:02:53.520 --> 0:02:57.519
<v Speaker 3>of support for third party smart watches to the same

0:02:57.560 --> 0:03:00.359
<v Speaker 3>degree as the Apple Watch, and a lack of support

0:03:00.880 --> 0:03:04.560
<v Speaker 3>for Apple Pay the NFC chip on third party applications.

0:03:05.280 --> 0:03:07.959
<v Speaker 3>I think of those five items, at least three, I

0:03:07.960 --> 0:03:09.960
<v Speaker 3>would say even three and a half of those items

0:03:10.160 --> 0:03:15.040
<v Speaker 3>have already been resolved. I expect the messages situation and

0:03:15.080 --> 0:03:18.600
<v Speaker 3>the NFC situations to be resolved as well. But taking

0:03:18.600 --> 0:03:21.040
<v Speaker 3>a step back here, you know, despite that, I don't

0:03:21.040 --> 0:03:24.640
<v Speaker 3>think the DJ is making great arguments given the resolutions

0:03:24.680 --> 0:03:28.040
<v Speaker 3>already in place. You have to be honest here. A

0:03:28.080 --> 0:03:30.760
<v Speaker 3>lot of these resolutions are in place because Apple has

0:03:30.840 --> 0:03:34.680
<v Speaker 3>been afraid of this impending DOJ lawsuit for several years,

0:03:34.920 --> 0:03:37.400
<v Speaker 3>and they knew these were where they would be attacked,

0:03:37.440 --> 0:03:39.360
<v Speaker 3>and so they knew they had to fix them. It

0:03:39.640 --> 0:03:43.240
<v Speaker 3>just for some reason, Apple implementing the fixes didn't stop

0:03:43.280 --> 0:03:45.960
<v Speaker 3>the DOJ from moving forward anyways, This is.

0:03:45.960 --> 0:03:46.840
<v Speaker 6>A global company.

0:03:47.120 --> 0:03:50.640
<v Speaker 4>Tim Cook in China at the moment seemingly all smiles

0:03:50.720 --> 0:03:55.440
<v Speaker 4>and some conversations happening with Baydoo around potential generative AI.

0:03:55.520 --> 0:03:57.800
<v Speaker 4>Of course, as many would say, as expected, that was

0:03:57.800 --> 0:04:01.080
<v Speaker 4>all street journal reporting, Mark. But what seems to be

0:04:01.160 --> 0:04:06.000
<v Speaker 4>at stake here is a philosophical difference. Philosophy driving Apple

0:04:06.040 --> 0:04:09.120
<v Speaker 4>and the way in which wants its own ecosystem to work,

0:04:09.160 --> 0:04:09.360
<v Speaker 4>and a.

0:04:09.360 --> 0:04:10.760
<v Speaker 6>Philosophy that seems to be changing.

0:04:10.840 --> 0:04:13.200
<v Speaker 4>Tach among regulators in the US and Europe is still

0:04:13.200 --> 0:04:17.120
<v Speaker 4>looking at Apple as a whole, not just individual places that

0:04:17.160 --> 0:04:18.440
<v Speaker 4>they act monopolistically.

0:04:19.760 --> 0:04:21.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, a few things. Well, of course Tim Cook is

0:04:21.800 --> 0:04:25.200
<v Speaker 3>going to be all smiles in China. He really has

0:04:25.720 --> 0:04:29.320
<v Speaker 3>no other option. China is a very important market and

0:04:29.400 --> 0:04:32.880
<v Speaker 3>Tim Cook is a poker player. He's not going to

0:04:33.120 --> 0:04:36.760
<v Speaker 3>show his true feelings about this DOJ lawsuit, certainly not

0:04:36.839 --> 0:04:39.120
<v Speaker 3>in front of the press and in a public setting

0:04:39.800 --> 0:04:43.040
<v Speaker 3>as China is. You know, Apple stock took a big

0:04:43.120 --> 0:04:46.080
<v Speaker 3>hit yesterday. I could think of ten better reasons for

0:04:46.160 --> 0:04:48.479
<v Speaker 3>you to sell your Apple stock than what's in this

0:04:48.560 --> 0:04:52.400
<v Speaker 3>DOJ lawsuit. Apple will certainly have to implement changes. I

0:04:52.480 --> 0:04:55.400
<v Speaker 3>would imagine that what you've saw in the European Union

0:04:55.720 --> 0:04:59.240
<v Speaker 3>regarding the digital market, sac changes, appside loading, opening up

0:04:59.240 --> 0:05:00.839
<v Speaker 3>the NFC chip, You're going to see a lot of

0:05:00.839 --> 0:05:03.760
<v Speaker 3>those changes over the next years occur in the US.

0:05:04.080 --> 0:05:05.640
<v Speaker 3>But I don't think that's going to do much to

0:05:05.760 --> 0:05:09.200
<v Speaker 3>change the fundamental situation with Apple. They're making a lot

0:05:09.200 --> 0:05:12.040
<v Speaker 3>of money from the app store. They need to figure

0:05:12.040 --> 0:05:14.960
<v Speaker 3>out a way to bring a next big hardware category

0:05:15.000 --> 0:05:18.440
<v Speaker 3>to market. Everyone thought that was the car. That's probably

0:05:18.520 --> 0:05:20.839
<v Speaker 3>what could have added fifty to one hundred billion or

0:05:20.880 --> 0:05:24.320
<v Speaker 3>more to Apple's bottom line on an annual basis. That's

0:05:24.360 --> 0:05:27.559
<v Speaker 3>what I could have doubled Apple's market cap to several

0:05:27.600 --> 0:05:30.760
<v Speaker 3>more trillion over time. That's no longer happening, and so

0:05:30.920 --> 0:05:34.279
<v Speaker 3>now I think the biggest issue for Apple is not regulation.

0:05:34.760 --> 0:05:36.839
<v Speaker 3>It's not how the app store is going to be impacted.

0:05:37.160 --> 0:05:38.960
<v Speaker 3>It's how Apple is going to continue to grow its

0:05:38.960 --> 0:05:41.679
<v Speaker 3>hardware business. And don't forget, seventy five percent of Apple

0:05:41.680 --> 0:05:44.919
<v Speaker 3>revenue is still hardware. Fundamentally, they are a hardware company,

0:05:45.160 --> 0:05:47.400
<v Speaker 3>and so they really need to figure out how they

0:05:47.520 --> 0:05:51.040
<v Speaker 3>expand there. But still AI, that's another important component, and

0:05:51.080 --> 0:05:52.719
<v Speaker 3>they need to figure out that situation too.

0:05:53.040 --> 0:05:55.599
<v Speaker 4>Need the next catalyst, Mark German, We thank you for

0:05:55.680 --> 0:05:57.000
<v Speaker 4>really breaking that all down, and we.

0:05:56.960 --> 0:05:59.360
<v Speaker 6>Want to just delve into the overhand from.

0:05:59.200 --> 0:06:01.159
<v Speaker 4>A regulatory perspect to go a little bit more and

0:06:01.160 --> 0:06:02.080
<v Speaker 4>the nuances around it.

0:06:02.120 --> 0:06:03.080
<v Speaker 6>William Cover chitches with.

0:06:03.120 --> 0:06:05.880
<v Speaker 4>Us George Washington Law School, Global Competition Professor of Law

0:06:05.920 --> 0:06:08.080
<v Speaker 4>and Policy work at the CMO of and UK at

0:06:08.080 --> 0:06:11.160
<v Speaker 4>one point, and William to that, and we all know

0:06:11.440 --> 0:06:14.280
<v Speaker 4>that these sorts of legal wranglings are distraction. How much

0:06:14.320 --> 0:06:16.080
<v Speaker 4>impact do you think you will have on a business model.

0:06:16.600 --> 0:06:18.960
<v Speaker 7>I think the distraction comes from the number of people

0:06:19.000 --> 0:06:21.800
<v Speaker 7>inside the company you have to commit to support the litigation.

0:06:22.400 --> 0:06:25.159
<v Speaker 7>We don't know what that number is, but the experience

0:06:25.200 --> 0:06:27.720
<v Speaker 7>in other major cases is that this can be a

0:06:27.760 --> 0:06:31.680
<v Speaker 7>significant drag on the company. You have also the inhibition

0:06:31.760 --> 0:06:34.440
<v Speaker 7>that comes from the pending lawsuits. Companies don't want to

0:06:34.520 --> 0:06:38.880
<v Speaker 7>provide additional ammunition for prosecutors. It means that they're not

0:06:38.960 --> 0:06:42.400
<v Speaker 7>quite as agile, not quite as adroit in developing business programs.

0:06:42.839 --> 0:06:47.520
<v Speaker 7>I realize these are somewhat intangible consequences, but then cumulatively,

0:06:47.760 --> 0:06:49.800
<v Speaker 7>when you take all of the developments we've just been

0:06:49.880 --> 0:06:53.400
<v Speaker 7>talking about, in the United States and abroad. It's an

0:06:53.440 --> 0:06:57.240
<v Speaker 7>avalanche of regulatory oversight that has to sap to some

0:06:57.400 --> 0:06:59.640
<v Speaker 7>extent the creative energy of the company.

0:07:01.000 --> 0:07:05.000
<v Speaker 5>Mister Kovachich, we sometimes talk about in this program regulating

0:07:05.120 --> 0:07:08.320
<v Speaker 5>through the courts, you know, a legal action to get

0:07:08.360 --> 0:07:11.440
<v Speaker 5>a result, that's the bigger picture. Is there an avenue

0:07:11.480 --> 0:07:14.000
<v Speaker 5>where Apple and the DOJ can just work this out

0:07:14.080 --> 0:07:15.000
<v Speaker 5>outside of court?

0:07:15.520 --> 0:07:18.600
<v Speaker 7>I would think there's always the possibility of reaching a solution.

0:07:19.280 --> 0:07:21.440
<v Speaker 7>The solution, though, is going to have to be one

0:07:21.480 --> 0:07:25.760
<v Speaker 7>that persuades the just This Department that the overall aim

0:07:26.080 --> 0:07:30.120
<v Speaker 7>of any specific settlement is not subject to evasion by

0:07:30.120 --> 0:07:31.280
<v Speaker 7>additional adjustments in.

0:07:31.280 --> 0:07:32.160
<v Speaker 3>The business model.

0:07:32.520 --> 0:07:34.680
<v Speaker 7>They'll have to be confident that the solution is one

0:07:34.720 --> 0:07:37.840
<v Speaker 7>that they can monitor and oversee effectively. I think that

0:07:38.000 --> 0:07:40.880
<v Speaker 7>there would be a willingness to discuss settlements. But a

0:07:40.960 --> 0:07:45.040
<v Speaker 7>major message that has come from the age agencies in

0:07:45.080 --> 0:07:48.160
<v Speaker 7>the US in recent years is a great deal of

0:07:48.160 --> 0:07:51.960
<v Speaker 7>skepticism about the efficacy of many settlement arrangements and doubts

0:07:52.000 --> 0:07:54.840
<v Speaker 7>about how readily you can implement them and be effective.

0:07:56.080 --> 0:07:59.520
<v Speaker 5>In your reading of the suit itself, do you think

0:07:59.560 --> 0:08:00.560
<v Speaker 5>the JAY.

0:08:00.840 --> 0:08:01.720
<v Speaker 8>Has a point here?

0:08:02.600 --> 0:08:05.160
<v Speaker 7>They do have a point, and the point is one

0:08:05.200 --> 0:08:10.120
<v Speaker 7>that in a sense involves again a collection of intangible considerations.

0:08:10.480 --> 0:08:14.400
<v Speaker 7>But there's anxiety about the possibility that incumbent firms that

0:08:14.480 --> 0:08:19.160
<v Speaker 7>have a significant market position, will, through a variety of tactics,

0:08:19.240 --> 0:08:23.040
<v Speaker 7>diminish the emergence of alternative technologies and.

0:08:23.040 --> 0:08:24.080
<v Speaker 3>New business models.

0:08:24.960 --> 0:08:28.160
<v Speaker 7>That concern might be very much the feeling that anti

0:08:28.240 --> 0:08:31.560
<v Speaker 7>trust law failed in the last thirty years to deal

0:08:31.560 --> 0:08:35.080
<v Speaker 7>effectively with the emergence of new tech. And I believe

0:08:35.160 --> 0:08:37.960
<v Speaker 7>a state of mind and perspective that has a tight

0:08:38.000 --> 0:08:40.560
<v Speaker 7>grip on the agencies is that they're not going to

0:08:40.600 --> 0:08:44.960
<v Speaker 7>allow the permissiveness of the past to continue. And it

0:08:45.000 --> 0:08:46.959
<v Speaker 7>means that they're going to dig in and look carefully

0:08:47.160 --> 0:08:50.439
<v Speaker 7>at anything that appears to be an effort by an

0:08:50.440 --> 0:08:55.240
<v Speaker 7>incumbent to see that new technologies, new business approaches do

0:08:55.360 --> 0:08:56.040
<v Speaker 7>not emerge.

0:08:56.840 --> 0:08:57.959
<v Speaker 6>This is dj action.

0:08:58.360 --> 0:09:03.520
<v Speaker 4>We've seen FTC have a similar focus. But sometimes this

0:09:03.640 --> 0:09:07.199
<v Speaker 4>is political. In an election year, does this sort of continue.

0:09:07.679 --> 0:09:09.960
<v Speaker 7>I'm going to give you a bit of speculation that

0:09:10.000 --> 0:09:13.280
<v Speaker 7>I could never prove in a rigorous way, but I

0:09:13.400 --> 0:09:18.079
<v Speaker 7>noticed that President Biden's opponent in many instances has been

0:09:18.120 --> 0:09:21.240
<v Speaker 7>skeptical of tech. Now that skepticism has been focused in

0:09:21.280 --> 0:09:26.440
<v Speaker 7>particular on the information services platforms that are involved in

0:09:26.440 --> 0:09:29.080
<v Speaker 7>involved in advertising, involved in social messaging.

0:09:29.360 --> 0:09:31.400
<v Speaker 3>But it was Donald Trump's Justice.

0:09:31.080 --> 0:09:35.320
<v Speaker 7>Department that initiated the Google search monopolization case. It was

0:09:35.360 --> 0:09:39.080
<v Speaker 7>Donald Trump's Federal Trade Commission that began the lawsuit against

0:09:39.120 --> 0:09:42.960
<v Speaker 7>Meta for its acquisition of Instagram. It could entirely be

0:09:43.080 --> 0:09:46.240
<v Speaker 7>possible that, at least for tech, given the way their

0:09:46.240 --> 0:09:50.400
<v Speaker 7>political contributions go, given his concern about the role they've

0:09:50.440 --> 0:09:53.600
<v Speaker 7>played in his own electoral process in the past, that

0:09:53.720 --> 0:09:55.720
<v Speaker 7>he may look at the FTC in the Department of

0:09:55.880 --> 0:09:57.800
<v Speaker 7>Justice and say, keep up the good work.

0:09:58.640 --> 0:10:01.840
<v Speaker 4>It was a Trump as well when this was first

0:10:01.840 --> 0:10:04.480
<v Speaker 4>initiated to Apple back in twenty nineteen, William cover Chich,

0:10:04.520 --> 0:10:05.199
<v Speaker 4>we thank you so much.

0:10:05.200 --> 0:10:07.439
<v Speaker 6>George Washington Law School, absolutely brilliant to get his take.

0:10:07.520 --> 0:10:09.600
<v Speaker 4>Mean while coming up, Look, we're going to be chatting

0:10:09.640 --> 0:10:12.880
<v Speaker 4>to a head moderator of Reddit forum all street bets.

0:10:12.960 --> 0:10:15.040
<v Speaker 4>You know you know it, well, I's going to be

0:10:15.120 --> 0:10:18.040
<v Speaker 4>joining us find out how reddits ipo, how much the

0:10:18.040 --> 0:10:35.720
<v Speaker 4>effect to the user base there's in Bloomberg Technology.

0:10:34.000 --> 0:10:37.480
<v Speaker 5>The fourth largest IPO of the year, Reddit climbed forty

0:10:37.520 --> 0:10:40.640
<v Speaker 5>eight percent on its first day of trading yesterday, after

0:10:40.679 --> 0:10:44.120
<v Speaker 5>pricing at the top of its marketed range, raising seven

0:10:44.200 --> 0:10:47.920
<v Speaker 5>hundred and forty eight million dollars. Let's bring in Bloombo's

0:10:48.000 --> 0:10:51.360
<v Speaker 5>Katie Ruth, who has lived and breathed reddits ipo this week.

0:10:52.679 --> 0:10:54.600
<v Speaker 5>That's true. I mean for many people, I would say

0:10:54.600 --> 0:10:55.440
<v Speaker 5>this went well.

0:10:55.440 --> 0:10:56.040
<v Speaker 8>This ipo.

0:10:56.559 --> 0:10:58.000
<v Speaker 6>So it did the first day.

0:10:58.200 --> 0:11:01.680
<v Speaker 9>Right now it's trading down, although yes, technically it's still

0:11:01.720 --> 0:11:05.240
<v Speaker 9>above well above the IPO price, it's not really much

0:11:05.280 --> 0:11:08.360
<v Speaker 9>above where it opened yesterday. And so I think there's

0:11:08.400 --> 0:11:10.800
<v Speaker 9>two numbers to watch here. It's the thirty four dollars

0:11:10.880 --> 0:11:12.959
<v Speaker 9>where priced at the top of the range, and that's

0:11:13.000 --> 0:11:16.400
<v Speaker 9>where the insiders, you could say, the institutional investors that

0:11:16.480 --> 0:11:19.120
<v Speaker 9>have banker connections, that's where they bought. And then some

0:11:19.520 --> 0:11:22.640
<v Speaker 9>some of Reddit's top users were able to buy at

0:11:22.640 --> 0:11:25.320
<v Speaker 9>that price. And then there's everybody else which bought it

0:11:25.400 --> 0:11:28.320
<v Speaker 9>that forty seven dollars a share where it opened yesterday,

0:11:28.520 --> 0:11:30.320
<v Speaker 9>and right now it's trading at.

0:11:30.200 --> 0:11:31.400
<v Speaker 8>Forty seven ish.

0:11:31.600 --> 0:11:35.000
<v Speaker 9>So and it was actually dipped below that opening price

0:11:35.080 --> 0:11:37.199
<v Speaker 9>this morning for a little bit, so some people could

0:11:37.240 --> 0:11:40.160
<v Speaker 9>have already lost some money on Reddit. But you know,

0:11:40.600 --> 0:11:41.920
<v Speaker 9>most are making money.

0:11:42.280 --> 0:11:46.240
<v Speaker 4>And certainly long term investors have cashed in here potentially, Katie,

0:11:46.280 --> 0:11:50.520
<v Speaker 4>I'm interested as to what this means for ongoing IPOs,

0:11:50.600 --> 0:11:53.480
<v Speaker 4>what this means more broadly, for money left on the table.

0:11:53.880 --> 0:11:55.360
<v Speaker 6>We want IPOs to do well.

0:11:55.520 --> 0:11:58.400
<v Speaker 4>Bankers certainly do, but the people raising the money don't

0:11:58.400 --> 0:11:59.640
<v Speaker 4>want them to go too well and feel that they

0:11:59.640 --> 0:12:02.480
<v Speaker 4>could have rais Yeah, the money left on.

0:12:02.440 --> 0:12:05.240
<v Speaker 9>The table argument is an interesting one. It sounds like

0:12:05.280 --> 0:12:08.079
<v Speaker 9>what you're referencing is where they could have raised even

0:12:08.120 --> 0:12:10.719
<v Speaker 9>more money and had less of a pop. I think

0:12:10.760 --> 0:12:14.040
<v Speaker 9>it's too early to tell whether Reddit allowed for too

0:12:14.120 --> 0:12:15.880
<v Speaker 9>much of a pop. You know, as I noted, it's

0:12:15.920 --> 0:12:18.679
<v Speaker 9>already trading lower today, and you know, we'll see what

0:12:18.760 --> 0:12:21.720
<v Speaker 9>happens next week. But you know, it depends on what

0:12:21.760 --> 0:12:24.360
<v Speaker 9>they're optimizing for. If they if they're just optimizing for

0:12:24.440 --> 0:12:27.360
<v Speaker 9>raising a little bit more cash, then you want to

0:12:27.480 --> 0:12:29.920
<v Speaker 9>price it high. But you don't want to make a

0:12:29.960 --> 0:12:32.360
<v Speaker 9>bad first impression on the stock market because it could

0:12:32.400 --> 0:12:36.040
<v Speaker 9>be really hard to recover from that. And so that's

0:12:36.160 --> 0:12:38.480
<v Speaker 9>you know, the argument that the bankers will make about

0:12:38.520 --> 0:12:42.719
<v Speaker 9>why they price it to pop. They also want these insiders,

0:12:42.760 --> 0:12:48.240
<v Speaker 9>these large anchor investors to keep buying more shares you know,

0:12:48.360 --> 0:12:50.720
<v Speaker 9>in this IPO and ips to come, and they're not

0:12:50.760 --> 0:12:52.240
<v Speaker 9>going to do that. They're not going to take that

0:12:52.440 --> 0:12:55.600
<v Speaker 9>risk on a new listing on the first day unless

0:12:55.640 --> 0:12:57.760
<v Speaker 9>they feel like they're getting some sort of discount.

0:12:58.360 --> 0:13:01.720
<v Speaker 4>Katie with go get some thank you so much as

0:13:01.760 --> 0:13:03.600
<v Speaker 4>we brace for more IPOs to come in the next

0:13:03.640 --> 0:13:06.040
<v Speaker 4>few weeks, I'm sure, but well, we want to get

0:13:06.080 --> 0:13:06.559
<v Speaker 4>a take.

0:13:06.400 --> 0:13:09.400
<v Speaker 6>On how the users, those redditors are.

0:13:09.360 --> 0:13:11.640
<v Speaker 4>Feeling about the company's IPO. They had a chance to

0:13:11.679 --> 0:13:13.640
<v Speaker 4>buy in, and of course we know the a vocal bunch.

0:13:13.960 --> 0:13:15.960
<v Speaker 4>Nor ours with us as a senior analyst and private

0:13:16.000 --> 0:13:18.320
<v Speaker 4>equity back to healthcare company. There's also been a Reddit

0:13:18.400 --> 0:13:21.160
<v Speaker 4>user for more than ten years, a moderator for the.

0:13:21.120 --> 0:13:22.719
<v Speaker 6>Forum Wall Street Bets for.

0:13:22.760 --> 0:13:26.439
<v Speaker 4>Nine, spending the most recent three years as a head moderator.

0:13:26.640 --> 0:13:28.880
<v Speaker 4>He joins us now to tell us more well basically

0:13:28.920 --> 0:13:32.000
<v Speaker 4>about Reddit's debut. How has Wall Street bets, How has

0:13:32.000 --> 0:13:33.240
<v Speaker 4>your community reacted?

0:13:33.360 --> 0:13:35.319
<v Speaker 6>Have you been positive on it?

0:13:35.320 --> 0:13:36.480
<v Speaker 3>It's really been a mixed bag.

0:13:36.720 --> 0:13:39.120
<v Speaker 10>There's a ton of positivity but also a lot of

0:13:39.160 --> 0:13:43.560
<v Speaker 10>people excited to short byputs. But Paul and all, they're

0:13:43.559 --> 0:13:46.079
<v Speaker 10>just excited for the volatility, and that's absolutely what we're

0:13:46.080 --> 0:13:46.880
<v Speaker 10>seeing here today.

0:13:47.400 --> 0:13:50.280
<v Speaker 5>Nor last week on the show, we reported on the

0:13:50.920 --> 0:13:53.559
<v Speaker 5>post that Reddit made itself saying we're going to do

0:13:53.600 --> 0:13:58.120
<v Speaker 5>an AMA and we will answer the questions in video format,

0:13:58.720 --> 0:14:01.920
<v Speaker 5>selecting the most up to posts. At the time that

0:14:01.960 --> 0:14:04.560
<v Speaker 5>we reported it on this program, the most upvoted post

0:14:04.640 --> 0:14:06.720
<v Speaker 5>is why are you even going public? It's not a

0:14:06.760 --> 0:14:10.000
<v Speaker 5>great vibe right now. Just give me your reaction to that.

0:14:10.080 --> 0:14:14.800
<v Speaker 5>I mean, it's the function of Reddit ironically pushing the

0:14:15.000 --> 0:14:16.200
<v Speaker 5>management to think again.

0:14:16.760 --> 0:14:20.160
<v Speaker 10>Absolutely, yeah, I think this is actually a great time

0:14:20.160 --> 0:14:23.480
<v Speaker 10>for Reddit to IPOs I'm surprised. Certainly there was a

0:14:23.520 --> 0:14:26.080
<v Speaker 10>lot of turmoil over the past year, but if you

0:14:26.120 --> 0:14:28.640
<v Speaker 10>look at what came out of that from a business perspective,

0:14:28.640 --> 0:14:31.120
<v Speaker 10>it's actually been very positive. We saw with the Reddit

0:14:31.200 --> 0:14:36.280
<v Speaker 10>protests that actually people found Reddit completely indispensable. There was

0:14:36.360 --> 0:14:39.760
<v Speaker 10>so much opportunity for a competitor to take reddits place,

0:14:40.200 --> 0:14:42.920
<v Speaker 10>and nothing came out of it. So this just goes

0:14:42.960 --> 0:14:46.080
<v Speaker 10>to show how deeply ingrained Reddit is in the zeitgeist

0:14:46.280 --> 0:14:47.960
<v Speaker 10>and that it's here to stay.

0:14:48.480 --> 0:14:51.440
<v Speaker 5>Nor there are many redditors and indeed moderators that have

0:14:51.600 --> 0:14:56.520
<v Speaker 5>big concerns on reddits plan to license user and platform

0:14:56.640 --> 0:15:00.520
<v Speaker 5>data to AI companies to use it to train la lens.

0:15:00.960 --> 0:15:02.960
<v Speaker 5>What's your position on it from.

0:15:02.720 --> 0:15:05.240
<v Speaker 10>A business perspective, It's definitely a risk. We're seeing that

0:15:05.320 --> 0:15:08.920
<v Speaker 10>the FTC is also looking into this, but it is

0:15:08.960 --> 0:15:13.360
<v Speaker 10>a huge opportunity and Reddit owns something that is very

0:15:13.400 --> 0:15:16.920
<v Speaker 10>special for lllms, and that is real time user reactions

0:15:17.280 --> 0:15:19.400
<v Speaker 10>to what's going on in the world around us, and

0:15:19.440 --> 0:15:22.120
<v Speaker 10>that's something that I think no other platform has. So

0:15:23.080 --> 0:15:25.560
<v Speaker 10>it's a great opportunity for Reddit to make money off

0:15:25.560 --> 0:15:28.200
<v Speaker 10>of that and then turn around and invest that money

0:15:28.280 --> 0:15:29.840
<v Speaker 10>in improving the user experience.

0:15:30.600 --> 0:15:33.160
<v Speaker 4>No, I want to ask about the evolution of moderation,

0:15:33.680 --> 0:15:37.320
<v Speaker 4>because money would say in anticipation in the IPO, reditor

0:15:37.440 --> 0:15:41.160
<v Speaker 4>really read it, really got ahead of ensuring that this

0:15:41.240 --> 0:15:43.240
<v Speaker 4>became a safer space to.

0:15:43.200 --> 0:15:46.040
<v Speaker 6>Be able to comment. Does that stand?

0:15:46.320 --> 0:15:49.040
<v Speaker 4>How has anything been lost in the focus of needing

0:15:49.080 --> 0:15:50.280
<v Speaker 4>to clean up the platform.

0:15:50.600 --> 0:15:53.200
<v Speaker 10>We've definitely lost a little bit of the chaos and

0:15:53.680 --> 0:15:57.280
<v Speaker 10>grit that you would have seen on Reddit ten fifteen

0:15:57.360 --> 0:16:01.080
<v Speaker 10>years ago. And although that lose some of its charm,

0:16:01.160 --> 0:16:03.640
<v Speaker 10>I think it's more reflective of the state of the

0:16:03.720 --> 0:16:07.160
<v Speaker 10>Internet rather than Reddit as a platform itself. We're seeing

0:16:07.600 --> 0:16:14.880
<v Speaker 10>all platforms, social media platforms censor in response to government

0:16:14.960 --> 0:16:18.640
<v Speaker 10>regulations and laws that have been placed on hate speech

0:16:18.680 --> 0:16:19.840
<v Speaker 10>and other types of speech.

0:16:20.240 --> 0:16:24.400
<v Speaker 3>So Reddit is actually maintaining.

0:16:23.920 --> 0:16:26.120
<v Speaker 10>Its position as the front page of the Internet and

0:16:26.160 --> 0:16:29.840
<v Speaker 10>simply reflecting what is on the Internet through these policy changes.

0:16:30.920 --> 0:16:35.040
<v Speaker 4>Wall streetbats was what we talked about day in, day

0:16:35.120 --> 0:16:38.960
<v Speaker 4>out in twenty twenty one through twenty twenty two name

0:16:39.040 --> 0:16:43.200
<v Speaker 4>being made around GameStop, the power that reditors had in

0:16:43.280 --> 0:16:46.040
<v Speaker 4>that moment. What do you think the powers of redditors

0:16:46.080 --> 0:16:47.320
<v Speaker 4>around the Reddit stock itself.

0:16:48.000 --> 0:16:50.360
<v Speaker 10>It'll be interesting to see It'll be interesting to see

0:16:50.400 --> 0:16:53.400
<v Speaker 10>you when redditors feel empowered that the actions they take

0:16:53.480 --> 0:16:57.360
<v Speaker 10>on the platform can make a meaningful impact on the

0:16:57.400 --> 0:17:02.280
<v Speaker 10>stock price of Reddit itself. Like with the game Stop debacle,

0:17:02.320 --> 0:17:04.760
<v Speaker 10>we saw over a billion page views in a very

0:17:04.840 --> 0:17:07.199
<v Speaker 10>very short period of time in a month, and we

0:17:07.200 --> 0:17:10.160
<v Speaker 10>saw that continue for several months. So to think that

0:17:10.640 --> 0:17:14.040
<v Speaker 10>redditors now who are might be investors themselves, can have

0:17:14.080 --> 0:17:17.240
<v Speaker 10>a positive impact on the stock will simply deepen their

0:17:17.280 --> 0:17:20.240
<v Speaker 10>relationship with the company and with the platform.

0:17:20.520 --> 0:17:22.920
<v Speaker 5>No, we just have thirty seconds for someone that has

0:17:22.960 --> 0:17:26.040
<v Speaker 5>no idea what Reddit is what's your pitch for them

0:17:26.040 --> 0:17:27.320
<v Speaker 5>to get onto the platform.

0:17:27.720 --> 0:17:30.800
<v Speaker 10>Reddit is a city that is incredibly deep, with countless

0:17:30.800 --> 0:17:35.200
<v Speaker 10>communities to fill every need that you knew or didn't

0:17:35.240 --> 0:17:37.399
<v Speaker 10>know that you are interested in learning more about. If

0:17:37.440 --> 0:17:41.159
<v Speaker 10>you've got an intellectual curiosity that can't be satisfied, Reddit

0:17:41.240 --> 0:17:41.879
<v Speaker 10>is the place for you.

0:17:42.640 --> 0:17:45.320
<v Speaker 5>Head moderator for and Wall Street bets on Reddit, and

0:17:45.320 --> 0:17:49.000
<v Speaker 5>I point out that moderators are volunteers to all intents

0:17:49.040 --> 0:17:51.119
<v Speaker 5>and purposes and are how great to have you on

0:17:51.160 --> 0:18:06.680
<v Speaker 5>the program.

0:17:59.200 --> 0:18:02.280
<v Speaker 4>Time Now tech first Up mayto one's quarterly revenue, it

0:18:02.320 --> 0:18:05.080
<v Speaker 4>climbed better than expected twenty three percent. Now that's a

0:18:05.119 --> 0:18:07.119
<v Speaker 4>sign that the company is actually making some headway in

0:18:07.160 --> 0:18:09.520
<v Speaker 4>its efforts to fend off a challenge from Byte Dances

0:18:09.640 --> 0:18:12.919
<v Speaker 4>Doyen in China's meal delivery arena. Now shares in the

0:18:12.920 --> 0:18:15.480
<v Speaker 4>company are up this year after losing more than half

0:18:15.560 --> 0:18:18.800
<v Speaker 4>of their value in twenty twenty three. Plus Wawei and

0:18:18.840 --> 0:18:21.760
<v Speaker 4>a secretive chip making partner in China, Well, they file

0:18:21.800 --> 0:18:24.439
<v Speaker 4>patterns for a lower tech but potentially effective way to

0:18:24.560 --> 0:18:26.359
<v Speaker 4>make advanced semiconductors.

0:18:26.520 --> 0:18:30.280
<v Speaker 6>And we're talking about self aligned quadruple patterning here or SAQP.

0:18:30.720 --> 0:18:33.800
<v Speaker 4>Basically, it's raising the prospect that China could improve chip

0:18:33.840 --> 0:18:36.000
<v Speaker 4>production techniques despite.

0:18:35.720 --> 0:18:37.320
<v Speaker 6>US efforts to hold its progress.

0:18:37.920 --> 0:18:40.520
<v Speaker 4>And lastly, Tesla, we'll go chick with steck with China

0:18:40.520 --> 0:18:43.440
<v Speaker 4>here because it's reduced production at its plants over there

0:18:43.480 --> 0:18:46.200
<v Speaker 4>amid us some sluggish growth and EV sales and intense

0:18:46.200 --> 0:18:46.760
<v Speaker 4>competition in the.

0:18:46.720 --> 0:18:48.200
<v Speaker 6>World's biggest all code auto market.

0:18:48.200 --> 0:18:50.959
<v Speaker 4>Now the car maker has instructed employees at its Shanghai

0:18:51.040 --> 0:18:54.480
<v Speaker 4>facility to lower production of the Model Y and Model three.

0:18:54.680 --> 0:18:57.040
<v Speaker 4>That's two vehicles that Tesla actually makes over there in

0:18:57.080 --> 0:18:59.240
<v Speaker 4>China by working just five days a week instead of

0:18:59.320 --> 0:19:00.520
<v Speaker 4>usual six and a half half days.

0:19:00.960 --> 0:19:02.640
<v Speaker 6>All of this, according to sources.

0:19:03.960 --> 0:19:08.719
<v Speaker 5>British audience in the UK pay attention. Vodaphone and Three's

0:19:08.840 --> 0:19:12.520
<v Speaker 5>UK combination is facing a deep check by the UK

0:19:12.640 --> 0:19:16.520
<v Speaker 5>Competition Markets Authority, the CMA, the regulator. They issued a

0:19:16.560 --> 0:19:20.240
<v Speaker 5>statement Friday saying they're concerned and they don't buy the

0:19:20.480 --> 0:19:25.520
<v Speaker 5>argument from Vodafone and three that combining the two would

0:19:25.560 --> 0:19:30.200
<v Speaker 5>mean better deals for customers. Vodaphones London listed shares actually

0:19:30.200 --> 0:19:32.880
<v Speaker 5>at one point eight percent with a little to go,

0:19:33.680 --> 0:19:37.919
<v Speaker 5>but it's an interesting story about consolidation in that market.

0:19:37.960 --> 0:19:38.680
<v Speaker 8>This is Bloomberg.

0:19:46.560 --> 0:19:48.439
<v Speaker 6>Welcome back to me new MEOT technology. I'm Caroline Hid

0:19:48.480 --> 0:19:48.720
<v Speaker 6>in New.

0:19:48.720 --> 0:19:51.200
<v Speaker 8>York and I'm Ed Ludlow in San Francisco.

0:19:51.440 --> 0:19:54.600
<v Speaker 4>Let's talk about this whole new wave of IPO names.

0:19:54.640 --> 0:19:57.359
<v Speaker 4>Read at Asteri Labs debuting this week and just whether

0:19:57.440 --> 0:19:58.960
<v Speaker 4>or not that's going to open up the pipeline. A

0:19:59.000 --> 0:20:02.160
<v Speaker 4>little bit more broadly, eyipa Practice Co had richual Garings

0:20:02.160 --> 0:20:05.920
<v Speaker 4>here to take basically on the feel good factor right now.

0:20:06.160 --> 0:20:09.840
<v Speaker 4>Thus far these companies have come to the market and come.

0:20:09.680 --> 0:20:11.880
<v Speaker 6>Well, does that mean suddenly the.

0:20:11.840 --> 0:20:13.560
<v Speaker 4>Yours the other names that we've been waiting for for

0:20:13.600 --> 0:20:15.200
<v Speaker 4>a long time, I'm gonna be galvanized.

0:20:15.240 --> 0:20:16.280
<v Speaker 6>Do you think it.

0:20:16.280 --> 0:20:20.080
<v Speaker 1>Definitely helps the momentum for what we're expecting in the

0:20:20.160 --> 0:20:22.080
<v Speaker 1>IPO market, the pipeline that.

0:20:22.040 --> 0:20:25.320
<v Speaker 11>We're seeing come through. As you all, we're noting.

0:20:25.080 --> 0:20:28.280
<v Speaker 1>Though, the post IPO performance of these companies that even

0:20:28.320 --> 0:20:31.480
<v Speaker 1>the ones before them, will really help continue setting the

0:20:31.520 --> 0:20:35.120
<v Speaker 1>stage and help influence what will continue coming to market

0:20:35.160 --> 0:20:37.320
<v Speaker 1>over these next several months and throughout the remainder of

0:20:37.400 --> 0:20:39.240
<v Speaker 1>twenty four We've got.

0:20:39.119 --> 0:20:41.040
<v Speaker 11>You know, positive momentum.

0:20:41.080 --> 0:20:43.159
<v Speaker 1>The trends are all going in the right way, but

0:20:43.520 --> 0:20:46.560
<v Speaker 1>not without its challenges. We're in a political you know cycle,

0:20:46.800 --> 0:20:49.720
<v Speaker 1>a political election cycle this year, so you know there's

0:20:49.760 --> 0:20:52.680
<v Speaker 1>going to continue to be elements and dynamics.

0:20:52.160 --> 0:20:56.280
<v Speaker 4>That everyone's going to have to navigate, dynamics being also

0:20:56.359 --> 0:20:58.960
<v Speaker 4>that the market is hungered for hungry for AI names.

0:20:59.520 --> 0:21:02.119
<v Speaker 4>When you're advising these companies, when that are coming to

0:21:02.160 --> 0:21:04.280
<v Speaker 4>you saying I want to navigate the quidity events, I

0:21:04.280 --> 0:21:05.640
<v Speaker 4>want to analyze the market.

0:21:05.960 --> 0:21:07.440
<v Speaker 6>Do you think about.

0:21:07.320 --> 0:21:10.359
<v Speaker 4>Basically where they need to be dining out on AI

0:21:10.480 --> 0:21:11.880
<v Speaker 4>for example, Well.

0:21:11.720 --> 0:21:16.399
<v Speaker 1>A AI is certainly something drawing a lot of focus interests,

0:21:16.440 --> 0:21:19.760
<v Speaker 1>particularly from investors, and when we think about AI, I

0:21:19.800 --> 0:21:20.760
<v Speaker 1>think about it in kind.

0:21:20.680 --> 0:21:23.280
<v Speaker 11>Of a few different buckets. You got the pure play.

0:21:23.400 --> 0:21:27.320
<v Speaker 1>AI companies, those that are developing the technology. There is

0:21:27.359 --> 0:21:30.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot of continued interest in this area, particularly in.

0:21:30.720 --> 0:21:32.080
<v Speaker 11>The private financing space.

0:21:32.240 --> 0:21:35.439
<v Speaker 1>So these companies are generally getting funded and where we

0:21:35.480 --> 0:21:38.720
<v Speaker 1>start seeing a flood of you know, ideos from them

0:21:38.840 --> 0:21:42.400
<v Speaker 1>over the coming months, and ye're meeting at onesie twosies,

0:21:42.440 --> 0:21:45.800
<v Speaker 1>but they're getting the financing they need, they're developing the technology.

0:21:46.320 --> 0:21:49.000
<v Speaker 1>But then I also look at other companies and how

0:21:49.040 --> 0:21:52.600
<v Speaker 1>they're employing AI within their companies and relative.

0:21:52.200 --> 0:21:54.360
<v Speaker 11>To their strategy. We're seeing that play out.

0:21:54.440 --> 0:21:58.400
<v Speaker 1>We're going to continue, not without skepticism from investors, kind

0:21:58.400 --> 0:22:00.800
<v Speaker 1>of proving it to me. And you've got those kind

0:22:00.800 --> 0:22:02.720
<v Speaker 1>of in the broader ecosystem that we're seeing right now

0:22:03.040 --> 0:22:06.000
<v Speaker 1>and how they're contributing to the A to AI in

0:22:06.080 --> 0:22:08.520
<v Speaker 1>that broader ecosystem, and we're going to continue seeing those

0:22:08.560 --> 0:22:09.400
<v Speaker 1>come to market as well.

0:22:10.200 --> 0:22:12.119
<v Speaker 5>Rachel, this is exactly what I was writing about in

0:22:12.200 --> 0:22:15.760
<v Speaker 5>my column in Tech Daily this morning, that Reddit, for example,

0:22:15.920 --> 0:22:20.040
<v Speaker 5>got its AI story right going into the IPO, you know,

0:22:20.160 --> 0:22:23.520
<v Speaker 5>the data licensing business. I think what would be interesting

0:22:23.600 --> 0:22:26.200
<v Speaker 5>to learn from you is what's more important that in

0:22:26.320 --> 0:22:29.359
<v Speaker 5>the S one process and the road show you sell

0:22:29.440 --> 0:22:32.879
<v Speaker 5>your AI story or is it more important that actually,

0:22:33.320 --> 0:22:36.440
<v Speaker 5>now a company like Reddit is listed, they can prove

0:22:36.920 --> 0:22:39.560
<v Speaker 5>they have an AI business, you know, after the fact

0:22:39.600 --> 0:22:40.560
<v Speaker 5>that it's actually real.

0:22:41.160 --> 0:22:44.280
<v Speaker 11>I think both are critical for obvious reasons.

0:22:44.359 --> 0:22:47.399
<v Speaker 1>But where we're seeing, you know, even when you're putting

0:22:47.400 --> 0:22:50.080
<v Speaker 1>that into your S one, going through your road shows,

0:22:50.920 --> 0:22:54.600
<v Speaker 1>investors asking you know, to prove it. So it's that

0:22:54.760 --> 0:22:58.200
<v Speaker 1>more it's not just about writing about the possibility and

0:22:58.520 --> 0:22:59.520
<v Speaker 1>the idea.

0:22:59.400 --> 0:23:02.639
<v Speaker 11>But what have you done even up to this point to.

0:23:02.720 --> 0:23:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Share with investors how you're proving this out, how you

0:23:05.920 --> 0:23:10.040
<v Speaker 1>truly have a strong plan that you're then now executing on.

0:23:10.480 --> 0:23:12.520
<v Speaker 1>And then proof will be in the putting post IPO,

0:23:12.960 --> 0:23:15.360
<v Speaker 1>how you're coming out and continuing to execute.

0:23:14.960 --> 0:23:17.239
<v Speaker 11>And perform to back all of that up.

0:23:18.040 --> 0:23:20.680
<v Speaker 1>And so as we continue to watch the performance of

0:23:20.760 --> 0:23:23.320
<v Speaker 1>these stocks, you know, two months from now, three months

0:23:23.359 --> 0:23:26.200
<v Speaker 1>from now so forth, they've got to continue demonstrating that

0:23:26.320 --> 0:23:29.320
<v Speaker 1>performance and stay good on the promises and commitments they made.

0:23:29.920 --> 0:23:33.639
<v Speaker 5>Rachel, how do you assess this week, this week's IPO window.

0:23:33.840 --> 0:23:36.159
<v Speaker 5>I don't even know if we call it window versus

0:23:36.400 --> 0:23:37.679
<v Speaker 5>what we saw in September.

0:23:38.880 --> 0:23:42.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, this is to me demonstrating, you know, we've

0:23:42.680 --> 0:23:47.680
<v Speaker 1>got investor interest around IPOs. The companies that are coming

0:23:47.720 --> 0:23:50.240
<v Speaker 1>to market right now is what we've expected. They're stilled,

0:23:50.320 --> 0:23:52.760
<v Speaker 1>they're large, they have a name, they have some history,

0:23:52.880 --> 0:23:56.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, performance history behind them as well. So the

0:23:56.680 --> 0:24:00.360
<v Speaker 1>risk profile is one of an appetite that's attracting investors.

0:24:00.680 --> 0:24:01.600
<v Speaker 6>As they continue to.

0:24:01.600 --> 0:24:04.359
<v Speaker 1>Perform, hopefully that starts to open up opportunity for more

0:24:04.400 --> 0:24:07.440
<v Speaker 1>the growth oriented companies to start coming to market and

0:24:07.560 --> 0:24:10.720
<v Speaker 1>really help drive some momentum and valumes over time getting

0:24:10.720 --> 0:24:12.200
<v Speaker 1>inspect to those historical norms.

0:24:12.520 --> 0:24:15.160
<v Speaker 11>But this is it's going to be instead a steady recovery.

0:24:15.320 --> 0:24:18.520
<v Speaker 1>We're not expecting a big, you know, balloon if you will,

0:24:19.160 --> 0:24:22.480
<v Speaker 1>or huge kind of spike. A steady recovery is what

0:24:22.560 --> 0:24:24.840
<v Speaker 1>we've continued to expect throughout twenty twenty four.

0:24:24.920 --> 0:24:26.960
<v Speaker 11>As we continue to see the market rebound.

0:24:27.320 --> 0:24:30.800
<v Speaker 4>I'm chure what's the motivating factor here? Med It wanted

0:24:30.920 --> 0:24:32.840
<v Speaker 4>IPO for years.

0:24:32.640 --> 0:24:35.000
<v Speaker 6>Says twenty twenty one. It was about a liquidity event.

0:24:34.840 --> 0:24:38.000
<v Speaker 4>For employees largely, but I'm sure time for investors to

0:24:38.520 --> 0:24:39.360
<v Speaker 4>have some money back.

0:24:39.680 --> 0:24:40.800
<v Speaker 6>What's driving other names?

0:24:42.560 --> 0:24:44.400
<v Speaker 11>Everyone had their facts and circumstances.

0:24:44.480 --> 0:24:45.840
<v Speaker 1>Some's going to be you know, they're going to be

0:24:45.880 --> 0:24:48.640
<v Speaker 1>anchoring around valuations and are they getting to a valuation

0:24:48.840 --> 0:24:54.080
<v Speaker 1>that they're expecting liquidity for employees, for other founders a

0:24:54.160 --> 0:24:56.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of PE right, we're going to start seeing how

0:24:56.560 --> 0:24:58.919
<v Speaker 1>how is PE going to start driving valuume. They've been

0:24:59.000 --> 0:25:01.840
<v Speaker 1>having some companies they've been holding for quite some time.

0:25:02.200 --> 0:25:03.920
<v Speaker 1>They want to start entering back into the M and

0:25:04.000 --> 0:25:07.320
<v Speaker 1>A market. As we see rates coming down, hopefully we'll

0:25:07.359 --> 0:25:10.480
<v Speaker 1>see more M and A activity even more from pe.

0:25:10.920 --> 0:25:13.880
<v Speaker 1>I think that's going to start influencing some exit from

0:25:14.200 --> 0:25:15.120
<v Speaker 1>their stage as well.

0:25:16.080 --> 0:25:18.800
<v Speaker 4>We want to thank you ey IPO Practice cohad Rachel

0:25:18.840 --> 0:25:21.760
<v Speaker 4>goering there on the IPO landscape where we just want

0:25:21.760 --> 0:25:24.480
<v Speaker 4>to stick with well companies going public none all of

0:25:24.520 --> 0:25:26.639
<v Speaker 4>them do IPOs, some of them do SPACs.

0:25:26.720 --> 0:25:28.840
<v Speaker 6>And former President Donald Trump's.

0:25:28.440 --> 0:25:31.520
<v Speaker 4>Media startup is likely to debut as a public company.

0:25:31.320 --> 0:25:34.080
<v Speaker 6>In coming days. Having voted today on whether.

0:25:34.000 --> 0:25:37.560
<v Speaker 4>Blank Check Company Digital World acquisition can proceed with taking

0:25:37.600 --> 0:25:40.520
<v Speaker 4>Trump Media and Technology Group public. It runs, of course

0:25:40.600 --> 0:25:44.080
<v Speaker 4>truth Social the platform, and it's been a long delayed

0:25:44.119 --> 0:25:46.480
<v Speaker 4>deal and seemingly has now approved. And a number of

0:25:46.520 --> 0:25:49.680
<v Speaker 4>insiders from management to sponsors and even former associates who

0:25:49.800 --> 0:25:52.399
<v Speaker 4>soone to stall or block the deal stand to pocket

0:25:52.760 --> 0:25:55.000
<v Speaker 4>millions of dollars and what have you got?

0:25:55.840 --> 0:25:57.400
<v Speaker 5>Okay, Coming up on the program, we're going to dive

0:25:57.440 --> 0:26:00.520
<v Speaker 5>into the world of climate investing AI. What on earth

0:26:00.600 --> 0:26:03.800
<v Speaker 5>happened this week in IPOs, everything and anything that we've

0:26:03.840 --> 0:26:07.560
<v Speaker 5>spoken about this week with Initialized Capital partner Kim Mai Cutler.

0:26:08.119 --> 0:26:10.120
<v Speaker 5>Really looking forward to that conversation. Next, this has Bloom

0:26:10.160 --> 0:26:30.320
<v Speaker 5>their technology. This is the Blackwell GPU or graphics processing

0:26:30.440 --> 0:26:34.200
<v Speaker 5>unit in Vidia's next generation AI accelerator, and it's the

0:26:34.320 --> 0:26:38.080
<v Speaker 5>star of GtC in Vidia's annual developers conference, which has

0:26:38.119 --> 0:26:39.840
<v Speaker 5>been dubbed the Woodstock for AI.

0:26:40.200 --> 0:26:42.800
<v Speaker 8>The B two hundred is more powerful than the H

0:26:42.920 --> 0:26:43.840
<v Speaker 8>one hundred.

0:26:43.600 --> 0:26:46.960
<v Speaker 5>The prior generation AI accelerator that's driven in video to

0:26:47.040 --> 0:26:50.160
<v Speaker 5>be the world's third most valuable company compared to Hopper.

0:26:50.359 --> 0:26:54.040
<v Speaker 5>Blackwell offers two point five times the performance for training

0:26:54.200 --> 0:26:57.920
<v Speaker 5>large language models and five times performance for running the model,

0:26:57.960 --> 0:27:01.600
<v Speaker 5>a process known as inference. In offer Blackwell in different forms,

0:27:01.680 --> 0:27:04.760
<v Speaker 5>including is the GB two hundred super chip, two Blackwell

0:27:04.880 --> 0:27:09.000
<v Speaker 5>GPUs and one Grace CPU in combination. Trays and trays

0:27:09.000 --> 0:27:11.840
<v Speaker 5>of GB two hundred go into liquid called rack scale

0:27:11.920 --> 0:27:14.960
<v Speaker 5>systems like this and ship to server companies and cloud

0:27:15.000 --> 0:27:18.480
<v Speaker 5>providers for their data centers. It's a market that Nvidia's

0:27:18.520 --> 0:27:21.040
<v Speaker 5>CEO says will start at two hundred and fifty billion

0:27:21.040 --> 0:27:24.399
<v Speaker 5>dollars annually and grow from there. The technology is capable

0:27:24.440 --> 0:27:29.639
<v Speaker 5>of processing AI models with one trillion parameters. GtC crowds

0:27:29.760 --> 0:27:33.280
<v Speaker 5>literally circled around the single demo server rak in droves.

0:27:33.359 --> 0:27:39.000
<v Speaker 8>The real thing start shipping in late twenty twenty four, so.

0:27:39.080 --> 0:27:43.119
<v Speaker 5>Among everything else, GtC ended last night, Caro, and you

0:27:43.200 --> 0:27:45.840
<v Speaker 5>know it was all about bow down to Blackwell.

0:27:45.760 --> 0:27:46.760
<v Speaker 8>And the deity.

0:27:46.880 --> 0:27:49.680
<v Speaker 5>Whether you're an AI startup founder or you are ADEL

0:27:49.800 --> 0:27:53.159
<v Speaker 5>or an infrastructure company, bow down to Jensen Wang and

0:27:53.280 --> 0:27:56.000
<v Speaker 5>in that might sound extreme, but trust me, they're on

0:27:56.040 --> 0:27:56.440
<v Speaker 5>the ground.

0:27:57.040 --> 0:27:57.960
<v Speaker 3>It was true.

0:27:58.480 --> 0:28:01.000
<v Speaker 4>And share prices really read benefit as well, not so

0:28:01.119 --> 0:28:03.600
<v Speaker 4>much of Nvidio, but sort of those that he anointed

0:28:03.680 --> 0:28:05.840
<v Speaker 4>the synopsis of this world, you say, Dell as well,

0:28:05.920 --> 0:28:08.800
<v Speaker 4>some of these companies managing to push on higher because

0:28:08.880 --> 0:28:11.600
<v Speaker 4>we are starting to see how they're able to tap

0:28:11.680 --> 0:28:14.840
<v Speaker 4>into this ecosystem that basically is the driving force from

0:28:14.840 --> 0:28:17.879
<v Speaker 4>an infrastructure perspective of everything that we now talk from

0:28:17.920 --> 0:28:20.800
<v Speaker 4>a value perspective in well public.

0:28:20.560 --> 0:28:21.480
<v Speaker 6>And private markets.

0:28:22.200 --> 0:28:24.840
<v Speaker 5>And as we've been saying, the show, get the AI

0:28:25.040 --> 0:28:27.119
<v Speaker 5>story right, because AI was also a big part of

0:28:27.160 --> 0:28:31.639
<v Speaker 5>the story. Yesterday, for Reddits public listing Day, Initialized Capitals

0:28:31.680 --> 0:28:35.200
<v Speaker 5>celebrated the IPO of its portfolio company, which is banking

0:28:35.400 --> 0:28:39.280
<v Speaker 5>on licensing its users data to builders of large language

0:28:39.320 --> 0:28:43.360
<v Speaker 5>models to fuel reddits growth. Let's bringing Initialized Capital partner

0:28:43.440 --> 0:28:44.760
<v Speaker 5>k in my cutler for more.

0:28:44.960 --> 0:28:46.800
<v Speaker 8>In today's VC Spotlight.

0:28:47.600 --> 0:28:51.640
<v Speaker 5>I wrote in my column today Reddit got the AI story, right,

0:28:51.760 --> 0:28:54.960
<v Speaker 5>I just thought it was really interesting that they went

0:28:55.040 --> 0:28:55.520
<v Speaker 5>there with that.

0:28:56.200 --> 0:28:57.320
<v Speaker 8>What did you make of it?

0:28:57.680 --> 0:29:00.240
<v Speaker 12>I mean, I think it's a tremendous day or the

0:29:00.280 --> 0:29:04.280
<v Speaker 12>whole team there for Steve, for Alexis. You know, that

0:29:04.680 --> 0:29:07.320
<v Speaker 12>company in particular has a long history and close ties

0:29:07.400 --> 0:29:10.920
<v Speaker 12>obviously with Sam Altman who runs openings, and so I

0:29:11.000 --> 0:29:14.320
<v Speaker 12>think that relationship over the last decade and more really

0:29:14.360 --> 0:29:19.400
<v Speaker 12>benefited their ability to ride this wave and rend itself

0:29:19.400 --> 0:29:22.160
<v Speaker 12>as an incredible consumer internet property. I mean, I'm a

0:29:22.280 --> 0:29:24.720
<v Speaker 12>user multiple times a day every day. I mean the

0:29:24.760 --> 0:29:26.840
<v Speaker 12>wealth of information that I have in all the different

0:29:27.000 --> 0:29:29.640
<v Speaker 12>like subcommunities, and the way that people talk honestly and

0:29:29.720 --> 0:29:32.280
<v Speaker 12>openly and freely about.

0:29:32.000 --> 0:29:32.520
<v Speaker 6>What they think.

0:29:33.400 --> 0:29:36.480
<v Speaker 12>You know, it's just an incredible data source and training set.

0:29:36.600 --> 0:29:39.080
<v Speaker 5>So what I find so interesting, particularly in the context

0:29:39.120 --> 0:29:41.920
<v Speaker 5>of where Initialized will deploy capital, right, the types of

0:29:42.000 --> 0:29:45.280
<v Speaker 5>startups that you'd invest in is redd It's an example

0:29:45.440 --> 0:29:47.680
<v Speaker 5>of where you don't need to be a builder of

0:29:47.800 --> 0:29:50.840
<v Speaker 5>large language models or an infrastructure play to be a

0:29:50.960 --> 0:29:54.240
<v Speaker 5>participant in what's happening in AI. Do you have any

0:29:54.280 --> 0:29:57.760
<v Speaker 5>parallel examples of companies you think will benefit from the

0:29:57.920 --> 0:29:59.440
<v Speaker 5>infrastructure investment that's happening.

0:30:00.080 --> 0:30:03.720
<v Speaker 12>I think for us, you know, we've long done many,

0:30:03.800 --> 0:30:07.560
<v Speaker 12>many different deals that have you know, very specific applications

0:30:07.680 --> 0:30:11.840
<v Speaker 12>to different workflows and different industries. So for example, you know,

0:30:11.960 --> 0:30:14.280
<v Speaker 12>you could think about the healthcare use case. We have

0:30:14.320 --> 0:30:17.840
<v Speaker 12>a company called glass Health that supports medical professionals and diagnoses.

0:30:18.240 --> 0:30:20.560
<v Speaker 12>We have another company called Parta that you know serves

0:30:20.560 --> 0:30:24.400
<v Speaker 12>as an AI copilot for financial compliance. And so there's

0:30:24.400 --> 0:30:28.680
<v Speaker 12>all these different specific industries with specific like legal requirements,

0:30:28.760 --> 0:30:32.600
<v Speaker 12>workflows and ways that people work that will need you know,

0:30:33.440 --> 0:30:36.720
<v Speaker 12>very very honed and refined applications of these foundational.

0:30:36.320 --> 0:30:37.760
<v Speaker 6>Models and kill.

0:30:38.240 --> 0:30:40.360
<v Speaker 4>It's a long way coming for some of these checks

0:30:40.400 --> 0:30:43.800
<v Speaker 4>that you've made into the Glass Health that you mentioned,

0:30:43.920 --> 0:30:47.080
<v Speaker 4>pano arenas, some of these other AI adjacent names that

0:30:47.120 --> 0:30:47.840
<v Speaker 4>you've invested in.

0:30:48.760 --> 0:30:50.400
<v Speaker 6>How are you thinking about exit strategy?

0:30:50.440 --> 0:30:50.560
<v Speaker 1>Though?

0:30:50.600 --> 0:30:52.880
<v Speaker 4>Longer term, what's been so interesting about this week was

0:30:52.960 --> 0:30:58.200
<v Speaker 4>also the Microsoft basically acqua hire of Inflection Stuff assum

0:30:58.320 --> 0:31:00.720
<v Speaker 4>when originally of DeepMind go Mean to be the head

0:31:00.760 --> 0:31:03.960
<v Speaker 4>of consumer AI from Microsoft. It feels as though big

0:31:04.080 --> 0:31:05.720
<v Speaker 4>tech juggernals are partnering in.

0:31:05.800 --> 0:31:08.040
<v Speaker 6>More and more innovative ways to some of the larger

0:31:08.120 --> 0:31:10.520
<v Speaker 6>language model companies. But how cool does that go for

0:31:10.600 --> 0:31:11.880
<v Speaker 6>the entire ecosystem here?

0:31:13.240 --> 0:31:15.120
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, I mean, I think some of the developments that

0:31:15.160 --> 0:31:19.200
<v Speaker 12>we've seen this week are reflection of consolidation in players

0:31:19.240 --> 0:31:22.800
<v Speaker 12>in the foundational market, the foundational model market. So obviously

0:31:22.920 --> 0:31:24.920
<v Speaker 12>they're there are companies that are far at a way

0:31:25.480 --> 0:31:28.920
<v Speaker 12>you know, have tremendous you know, revenue you know, like

0:31:29.000 --> 0:31:33.960
<v Speaker 12>revenue run rates and thinking like Shatgypt and Nanthropic, and

0:31:34.000 --> 0:31:36.440
<v Speaker 12>then companies that aren't quite at that level or don't

0:31:36.480 --> 0:31:40.200
<v Speaker 12>have that same level of revenue growth are having to

0:31:40.240 --> 0:31:42.520
<v Speaker 12>make different decisions about you know, what they need to

0:31:42.600 --> 0:31:45.000
<v Speaker 12>do given the cost of compute and the cost of

0:31:45.080 --> 0:31:48.880
<v Speaker 12>going forward. You know, I think, you know, as a

0:31:48.920 --> 0:31:51.920
<v Speaker 12>seat stage investor, we have companies that we're working with

0:31:52.520 --> 0:31:54.840
<v Speaker 12>for you know, we might be working with them for

0:31:54.960 --> 0:31:57.719
<v Speaker 12>five to ten ten years before we go you know public.

0:31:58.520 --> 0:32:00.560
<v Speaker 12>And you know, if I look at the early you know,

0:32:00.680 --> 0:32:04.560
<v Speaker 12>some of the earlier friends, our previous IPOs like Instacurrent,

0:32:04.640 --> 0:32:09.640
<v Speaker 12>Coybats have also had you know, a very positive momentum

0:32:09.680 --> 0:32:12.400
<v Speaker 12>over the last six six months, two a year. And

0:32:12.480 --> 0:32:15.320
<v Speaker 12>then going forward, we're going to have companies that perhaps

0:32:15.360 --> 0:32:17.280
<v Speaker 12>you and I will be talking about in five, seven

0:32:17.480 --> 0:32:17.960
<v Speaker 12>or ten years.

0:32:18.680 --> 0:32:22.760
<v Speaker 4>What's been interesting this week in the context of AI,

0:32:23.000 --> 0:32:25.720
<v Speaker 4>whether it's US China relations, but there's also a context

0:32:25.800 --> 0:32:28.120
<v Speaker 4>more broadly of where the government plays with this.

0:32:28.360 --> 0:32:30.400
<v Speaker 6>We had or cause, the big announcement from.

0:32:30.400 --> 0:32:33.160
<v Speaker 4>Intel getting more subsidies to be able to be building

0:32:33.240 --> 0:32:35.240
<v Speaker 4>here in the United States, and I know that's something

0:32:35.280 --> 0:32:36.240
<v Speaker 4>that you're thinking a lot about.

0:32:36.280 --> 0:32:37.720
<v Speaker 6>In the context of climate.

0:32:37.440 --> 0:32:41.240
<v Speaker 4>Technology as well, we have money being pushed from the

0:32:41.320 --> 0:32:44.400
<v Speaker 4>EV perspective this week, regulation being pushed from an EV

0:32:44.520 --> 0:32:48.400
<v Speaker 4>perspective to really perhaps enhance electric vehicle manufacturing here in

0:32:48.440 --> 0:32:51.280
<v Speaker 4>the US. Can I when you're thinking about the opportunity

0:32:51.440 --> 0:32:55.040
<v Speaker 4>IRA or another way of investing in climate tech, does

0:32:55.080 --> 0:32:55.800
<v Speaker 4>that stick.

0:32:57.080 --> 0:32:57.680
<v Speaker 8>Absolutely?

0:32:57.840 --> 0:33:02.560
<v Speaker 12>I mean, you know, the government, the IRA has provided

0:33:02.600 --> 0:33:05.760
<v Speaker 12>a number of you know, carrots and sticks, predominantly carrots

0:33:06.440 --> 0:33:09.040
<v Speaker 12>that have tremendously expanded the market for some of our companies. So,

0:33:09.200 --> 0:33:14.120
<v Speaker 12>for example, having more punitive measures around methane emissions is

0:33:14.160 --> 0:33:16.520
<v Speaker 12>a is a real benefit to one of our company's, Orbio,

0:33:16.560 --> 0:33:21.280
<v Speaker 12>which is using satellite imagery to really pinpoint methane leaks

0:33:21.320 --> 0:33:25.320
<v Speaker 12>from specific facilities. You know, the incentives and the IRA

0:33:25.680 --> 0:33:31.080
<v Speaker 12>around you know, revenue or purchase. Government purchases of carbon

0:33:31.160 --> 0:33:34.480
<v Speaker 12>removal are also helping to mature that market. And we

0:33:34.560 --> 0:33:37.840
<v Speaker 12>have another company in southern California from a former SpaceX

0:33:37.880 --> 0:33:42.160
<v Speaker 12>engineer called Clarity that is doing carbon dioxide removal at uh,

0:33:42.560 --> 0:33:45.600
<v Speaker 12>you know, with lower energy intensity and usage and costs.

0:33:45.680 --> 0:33:47.600
<v Speaker 5>I'm sure because right at the top of your blog

0:33:47.680 --> 0:33:50.080
<v Speaker 5>post which I read this morning, you were talking about

0:33:50.120 --> 0:33:50.800
<v Speaker 5>the Chips Act.

0:33:51.240 --> 0:33:54.080
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, at lower down at the early stage. Is there

0:33:54.120 --> 0:33:56.960
<v Speaker 8>any benefit felt by the Chips Act in terms of

0:33:57.120 --> 0:33:58.080
<v Speaker 8>inflation Reduction Act?

0:33:58.200 --> 0:33:58.280
<v Speaker 1>Right?

0:33:58.280 --> 0:34:00.640
<v Speaker 12>Inflation reduction? That's right, I mean, there's there's there's obviously

0:34:00.720 --> 0:34:03.560
<v Speaker 12>benefits from both. But like if we're talking about you know,

0:34:04.440 --> 0:34:08.400
<v Speaker 12>a long term investment in you know, the United States

0:34:08.600 --> 0:34:14.279
<v Speaker 12>ability around manufacturing and deep tech, I think that's you know,

0:34:14.480 --> 0:34:17.239
<v Speaker 12>bringing in a lot of like tax rep you know,

0:34:17.360 --> 0:34:20.600
<v Speaker 12>tax credits and tax incentives around building facilities here in

0:34:20.680 --> 0:34:23.399
<v Speaker 12>this country. So for example, you know, to to really

0:34:23.520 --> 0:34:26.480
<v Speaker 12>get carbon removal to the next stage, we're going to

0:34:26.520 --> 0:34:29.600
<v Speaker 12>have to see facilities all over you know, the United States,

0:34:30.280 --> 0:34:33.719
<v Speaker 12>particularly in you know, in the Southwest where Clarity is

0:34:33.760 --> 0:34:35.960
<v Speaker 12>looking to do its first production facility and its first

0:34:35.960 --> 0:34:38.280
<v Speaker 12>facility as well. And that's going to create a tremendous

0:34:38.280 --> 0:34:40.160
<v Speaker 12>amount of jobs for all kinds of Americans.

0:34:40.600 --> 0:34:43.200
<v Speaker 5>Innationalist capital partner, can I cut look great to have

0:34:43.320 --> 0:34:44.840
<v Speaker 5>you here on set in San Francisco.

0:34:44.960 --> 0:34:45.200
<v Speaker 8>Thank you.

0:34:53.440 --> 0:34:54.839
<v Speaker 3>I love playing just there.

0:34:54.960 --> 0:34:56.799
<v Speaker 11>So this is one of the things that we all

0:34:56.920 --> 0:35:00.440
<v Speaker 11>have enabled me to do something that I wasn't able to.

0:35:00.840 --> 0:35:04.440
<v Speaker 12>Really do much the last few years, especially not like this.

0:35:06.040 --> 0:35:07.840
<v Speaker 3>I had to use like a mouth stick and suffer.

0:35:08.080 --> 0:35:11.160
<v Speaker 3>Now it's well, it's all being done with my brain.

0:35:12.320 --> 0:35:15.080
<v Speaker 4>Just part of a live stream with Neuralink's first brain

0:35:15.239 --> 0:35:19.040
<v Speaker 4>implant patient, showing a quadriplegic man who was able to

0:35:19.080 --> 0:35:21.440
<v Speaker 4>play video games and online.

0:35:21.120 --> 0:35:22.520
<v Speaker 6>Chess using just his mind.

0:35:22.840 --> 0:35:25.440
<v Speaker 4>Neuralink, of course, is a brain technology startup founded by

0:35:25.480 --> 0:35:28.919
<v Speaker 4>Elon musk Is. Implant allows a patient to use their.

0:35:28.920 --> 0:35:30.680
<v Speaker 6>Thoughts to control a computer.

0:35:31.440 --> 0:35:31.480
<v Speaker 7>Ed.

0:35:32.719 --> 0:35:35.160
<v Speaker 5>Bitcoin has peeled back more than ten percent from its

0:35:35.239 --> 0:35:37.160
<v Speaker 5>all time high and maybe headed for one of its

0:35:37.239 --> 0:35:40.160
<v Speaker 5>worst weeks of twenty twenty four. This is the appetite

0:35:40.560 --> 0:35:43.560
<v Speaker 5>the spot Bitcoin ETF seems to be slowing down. Big

0:35:43.600 --> 0:35:47.000
<v Speaker 5>Go CEO Mike Belshe joins us, Now that was the intro.

0:35:47.800 --> 0:35:50.200
<v Speaker 5>What do you think is happening right now? With Bitcoin.

0:35:50.480 --> 0:35:53.520
<v Speaker 13>Well, usually I do not like to predict price, but

0:35:53.640 --> 0:35:55.919
<v Speaker 13>I think we're at a very very good time. Of course,

0:35:55.920 --> 0:35:58.800
<v Speaker 13>there's some consolidation, as saying, I guess in the space

0:35:58.880 --> 0:36:01.560
<v Speaker 13>that hey, if you're not ready for my twenty percent drops,

0:36:01.560 --> 0:36:03.840
<v Speaker 13>you're certainly not ready for my six hundred percent increases.

0:36:04.719 --> 0:36:06.520
<v Speaker 2>But overall, what we're seeing some consolidation.

0:36:06.760 --> 0:36:09.040
<v Speaker 13>The ETFs just launched, we've seen tremendous run up in

0:36:09.080 --> 0:36:11.480
<v Speaker 13>a very short period of time. A little bit of

0:36:11.520 --> 0:36:14.560
<v Speaker 13>pullback is happening, but you know, all of the macro

0:36:14.640 --> 0:36:19.400
<v Speaker 13>climate remains extremely bullish for bitcoin, primarily due to what

0:36:19.480 --> 0:36:21.719
<v Speaker 13>people know about the long term just what we care

0:36:21.760 --> 0:36:25.959
<v Speaker 13>about most at bitco, which is look term macro looks

0:36:26.000 --> 0:36:27.879
<v Speaker 13>like we're still going to be very solid with having

0:36:27.920 --> 0:36:30.480
<v Speaker 13>a static supply of bitcoin being something that you can

0:36:30.560 --> 0:36:33.239
<v Speaker 13>count on that doesn't get eroded. And of course, you

0:36:33.280 --> 0:36:37.600
<v Speaker 13>know fiat currencies continuing to do massive changes with debt

0:36:37.840 --> 0:36:40.839
<v Speaker 13>and deficits and no sign of change for that front.

0:36:41.600 --> 0:36:42.040
<v Speaker 3>Bitcoin.

0:36:42.160 --> 0:36:44.200
<v Speaker 4>We've got the Harbing coming up as well, potentially another

0:36:44.680 --> 0:36:48.160
<v Speaker 4>underpinning of price. But who's been getting into these ETFs

0:36:48.160 --> 0:36:48.800
<v Speaker 4>and we've been able.

0:36:48.680 --> 0:36:49.560
<v Speaker 6>To manage flow his mine.

0:36:49.880 --> 0:36:50.719
<v Speaker 2>We have a little bit.

0:36:51.040 --> 0:36:53.640
<v Speaker 13>Actually, so far, I think it's been mostly the smaller

0:36:53.680 --> 0:36:58.000
<v Speaker 13>ticket sizes. So remember, institutions move pretty slowly, pretty glacially. Frankly,

0:36:58.680 --> 0:37:00.880
<v Speaker 13>I think we've seen a wave of retail here over

0:37:00.920 --> 0:37:03.160
<v Speaker 13>the last two and a half months. I think it's

0:37:03.200 --> 0:37:05.920
<v Speaker 13>getting a little bit bigger. But the institutions, you know,

0:37:06.000 --> 0:37:08.200
<v Speaker 13>we've seen some smaller hedge funds come in, Larger hedge

0:37:08.200 --> 0:37:11.719
<v Speaker 13>funds will come in. Pension funds are coming, endowments are

0:37:11.719 --> 0:37:15.200
<v Speaker 13>already here. So now that we have an ETF available,

0:37:15.239 --> 0:37:17.439
<v Speaker 13>which is the distribution channel, which makes it super easy

0:37:17.480 --> 0:37:20.000
<v Speaker 13>for everybody to participate. It takes a little bit of

0:37:20.040 --> 0:37:22.080
<v Speaker 13>time to go through investment committees, but I think that

0:37:22.360 --> 0:37:24.759
<v Speaker 13>we're starting to see that run up happen now all

0:37:24.800 --> 0:37:26.560
<v Speaker 13>through the summer at rhymes.

0:37:26.560 --> 0:37:28.040
<v Speaker 2>So you should say it eightyk by May.

0:37:29.040 --> 0:37:32.480
<v Speaker 8>In the moment the calendar its and the harving, what happens?

0:37:32.560 --> 0:37:33.040
<v Speaker 8>Do you think?

0:37:34.560 --> 0:37:34.600
<v Speaker 3>So?

0:37:34.719 --> 0:37:37.440
<v Speaker 13>The having is an interesting pattern that people look at,

0:37:37.960 --> 0:37:40.680
<v Speaker 13>but I think really the most interesting part is the

0:37:40.800 --> 0:37:44.680
<v Speaker 13>long term meaning of the having. So bitcoin has a

0:37:44.800 --> 0:37:47.719
<v Speaker 13>monetary policy which was set in motion back in two

0:37:47.760 --> 0:37:50.600
<v Speaker 13>thousand and nine, and it has remained completely unchanged since

0:37:50.640 --> 0:37:53.719
<v Speaker 13>that time. It's the longest standing unchanged monetary policy in

0:37:53.760 --> 0:37:56.680
<v Speaker 13>the history of mankind, and this having is a demonstration

0:37:57.160 --> 0:38:00.840
<v Speaker 13>that bitcoin has a solid commitment, unchangeable commitment to that policy,

0:38:00.840 --> 0:38:03.840
<v Speaker 13>which we'll keep going. So with the having the supply

0:38:04.040 --> 0:38:07.440
<v Speaker 13>decreases on a block by block basis, which means that

0:38:07.480 --> 0:38:09.880
<v Speaker 13>we see a lower rate of inflation. Some measure this

0:38:10.040 --> 0:38:12.400
<v Speaker 13>stock to flow and other measurements of how you compare

0:38:12.480 --> 0:38:13.280
<v Speaker 13>that to other assets?

0:38:13.360 --> 0:38:13.440
<v Speaker 7>Right?

0:38:13.480 --> 0:38:16.439
<v Speaker 2>How they but bitcoins in a very good stead is one.

0:38:16.320 --> 0:38:20.120
<v Speaker 13>Of the most static supply assets on the planet, him

0:38:20.160 --> 0:38:21.800
<v Speaker 13>will she It's been great to catch up with you.

0:38:22.000 --> 0:38:24.759
<v Speaker 4>Thank you so much bitco ceo. As we have seen,

0:38:24.840 --> 0:38:27.960
<v Speaker 4>of course, one of the worst weeks for bitcoin this year.

0:38:28.320 --> 0:38:30.560
<v Speaker 4>That does it for this though edition of BlueBag Technology.

0:38:30.640 --> 0:38:33.320
<v Speaker 5>Yet what a week has been. What an ends of

0:38:33.320 --> 0:38:35.200
<v Speaker 5>the week? Check out the podcast. So many of you

0:38:35.360 --> 0:38:38.520
<v Speaker 5>are listening to the podcast. The platforms are Apple, Spotify,

0:38:38.719 --> 0:38:41.239
<v Speaker 5>iHeart and of course we publish to all of our

0:38:41.280 --> 0:38:45.040
<v Speaker 5>own platforms here at Bloomberg from San Francisco and New

0:38:45.120 --> 0:38:45.640
<v Speaker 5>York City.

0:38:46.320 --> 0:38:48.000
<v Speaker 8>This is Bloomberg Technology