WEBVTT - Xtras: The Lighthouse

0:00:00.320 --> 0:00:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Today's episode contains spoilers for The Witch and The Lighthouse,

0:00:05.760 --> 0:00:25.440
<v Speaker 1>so be prepared for that. Hello, my name is Joel Lenique.

0:00:25.680 --> 0:00:28.240
<v Speaker 2>And I am Carmen Laurent and.

0:00:28.200 --> 0:00:30.760
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Xtra Vision Extras, an X ray vision series

0:00:30.760 --> 0:00:34.440
<v Speaker 1>where we dive deep into even more of your favorite shows, movies, comics,

0:00:34.440 --> 0:00:38.040
<v Speaker 1>and pop culture. Every superhero team meets side Quest, and

0:00:38.120 --> 0:00:40.680
<v Speaker 1>our rotating panel of producers and guest hosts will be

0:00:40.720 --> 0:00:43.000
<v Speaker 1>suiting up to help Jason and Rosie cover all of

0:00:43.040 --> 0:00:44.600
<v Speaker 1>the amazing nerd content out there.

0:00:45.040 --> 0:00:49.040
<v Speaker 2>Today in the series of Robert Egger's coverage, we are

0:00:49.080 --> 0:00:55.080
<v Speaker 2>covering the movie from twenty nineteen, The Lighthouse, and in

0:00:55.120 --> 0:00:57.400
<v Speaker 2>our this is all in our lead up to the

0:00:57.600 --> 0:01:00.840
<v Speaker 2>movie coming out on Christmas Day this year No Speratu,

0:01:01.160 --> 0:01:05.119
<v Speaker 2>so get ready for that and like I said, get

0:01:05.160 --> 0:01:06.119
<v Speaker 2>all your gas out now.

0:01:07.280 --> 0:01:12.679
<v Speaker 1>Tired of these damn farts. But first, yes, previously on okay,

0:01:12.760 --> 0:01:15.119
<v Speaker 1>let's try to have you listened to The Witch. Last

0:01:15.120 --> 0:01:16.960
<v Speaker 1>week we had a very chaotic recap. We're going to

0:01:17.000 --> 0:01:20.240
<v Speaker 1>try to duplicate recapping the Stillness Sour. I was thinking

0:01:20.240 --> 0:01:23.880
<v Speaker 1>about Essel's watching and I was like, it's so big

0:01:24.000 --> 0:01:28.840
<v Speaker 1>and nebulous. This movie that it's really hard to beyond

0:01:28.880 --> 0:01:31.280
<v Speaker 1>the basic description, which I think would go something like

0:01:31.319 --> 0:01:35.240
<v Speaker 1>this young man gets hired to go to a lighthouse

0:01:35.520 --> 0:01:42.840
<v Speaker 1>where he meets an over zealous aged lighthouse watcher. Uh huh,

0:01:43.319 --> 0:01:47.440
<v Speaker 1>as he's pushed to the edge of his sanity to

0:01:47.440 --> 0:01:51.120
<v Speaker 1>anyone with an overzealous boss can easily identify with a

0:01:51.200 --> 0:01:55.440
<v Speaker 1>battle ensues between the two of them, centered specifically on

0:01:55.520 --> 0:02:02.240
<v Speaker 1>their masculinity. Over time, power exchanges hands more and more rapidly,

0:02:02.280 --> 0:02:04.800
<v Speaker 1>to the point where sometimes you're talking two minutes of

0:02:04.840 --> 0:02:07.360
<v Speaker 1>a character being in a position of power before somebody

0:02:07.360 --> 0:02:11.560
<v Speaker 1>else overtakes that. Uh. They are driven mad by isolation,

0:02:12.160 --> 0:02:13.359
<v Speaker 1>bad weather.

0:02:13.320 --> 0:02:16.440
<v Speaker 2>And the sea, maybe even the lighthouse.

0:02:16.720 --> 0:02:19.960
<v Speaker 1>Possibly, Oh, we're going to get into Possibly the lighthouse

0:02:20.040 --> 0:02:23.280
<v Speaker 1>is doing it, and they're both driven to a state

0:02:23.280 --> 0:02:26.120
<v Speaker 1>of madness that sort of ends up in a BDSM

0:02:26.240 --> 0:02:31.160
<v Speaker 1>pet play relationships. There are a spackling of great Shakespearean

0:02:31.200 --> 0:02:35.600
<v Speaker 1>monologues where Egres gets to showcase his knowledge of the

0:02:35.639 --> 0:02:39.240
<v Speaker 1>bard An attempt to do some of his own monologue writing,

0:02:40.080 --> 0:02:45.000
<v Speaker 1>and mysterious ending did we do it, didn't we do it?

0:02:45.160 --> 0:02:54.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's very it's very I mean, this is like

0:02:54.680 --> 0:02:57.000
<v Speaker 2>and we're gonna we're gonna talk about it in the

0:02:57.040 --> 0:03:01.040
<v Speaker 2>discussion here, but it's very much like a very cosmic horror,

0:03:01.240 --> 0:03:04.519
<v Speaker 2>and that is what leads to it being kind of,

0:03:04.560 --> 0:03:08.320
<v Speaker 2>I think, so confusing and also fun to watch, or

0:03:08.320 --> 0:03:10.239
<v Speaker 2>all of the cosmic elements of this.

0:03:11.040 --> 0:03:14.240
<v Speaker 1>So glad you said cosmic horror, because the whole time

0:03:14.320 --> 0:03:18.880
<v Speaker 1>I was thinking about space. Hear me out, Yes, like

0:03:19.000 --> 0:03:23.720
<v Speaker 1>the ocean being this vast unknown, the ocean maybe being

0:03:23.760 --> 0:03:27.880
<v Speaker 1>a stand in for women. I had this thought of, like, Okay,

0:03:28.080 --> 0:03:31.600
<v Speaker 1>maybe this film is saying the ocean is like women

0:03:31.680 --> 0:03:34.800
<v Speaker 1>in that they are deep and unknowable, and they are

0:03:34.960 --> 0:03:37.839
<v Speaker 1>a horizon you cannot touch, especially if you're a man

0:03:37.960 --> 0:03:42.200
<v Speaker 1>isolated on an island with another man, which was like,

0:03:42.840 --> 0:03:45.800
<v Speaker 1>that's the the layers of visual artistry we're dealing with.

0:03:46.080 --> 0:03:47.640
<v Speaker 1>Let's go over some of the stats of this film

0:03:47.640 --> 0:03:51.240
<v Speaker 1>before we get too far into a breakdown. So this

0:03:51.280 --> 0:03:54.320
<v Speaker 1>is released May nineteen, twenty nineteen. It can October eighteenth.

0:03:54.400 --> 0:03:56.880
<v Speaker 1>It comes to US theaters. It's got a budget of

0:03:56.920 --> 0:03:59.560
<v Speaker 1>eleven million and does a box office of about eighteen

0:03:59.640 --> 0:04:02.840
<v Speaker 1>point three, which for a sophomore film coming off the

0:04:02.880 --> 0:04:08.400
<v Speaker 1>success of The Witch. Yeah, it's interesting. I think from

0:04:08.560 --> 0:04:12.240
<v Speaker 1>a producer investor perspective, this might have been a little

0:04:12.240 --> 0:04:18.480
<v Speaker 1>bit disappointing. But from an artistic director standpoint, if your

0:04:18.520 --> 0:04:23.520
<v Speaker 1>movie makes money, you did it. We can pay back

0:04:23.560 --> 0:04:26.560
<v Speaker 1>the investors. Everyone got a small percentage. We didn't make

0:04:26.560 --> 0:04:28.080
<v Speaker 1>as much money as we were hoping, but we got

0:04:28.080 --> 0:04:29.520
<v Speaker 1>our percentages off.

0:04:29.800 --> 0:04:33.120
<v Speaker 2>That's a seven million, seven million, you know.

0:04:33.120 --> 0:04:36.440
<v Speaker 1>What, Damn straight seven million is enough to start funding

0:04:36.480 --> 0:04:38.919
<v Speaker 1>the next film. We can put it that way. Jarren

0:04:39.000 --> 0:04:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Blashki is the cinematographer.

0:04:41.480 --> 0:04:45.279
<v Speaker 2>Sorry, also basically the same team he used for The

0:04:45.360 --> 0:04:50.880
<v Speaker 2>Witch Yes music and cinematography, which is great.

0:04:51.000 --> 0:04:54.400
<v Speaker 1>I think I really appreciate a director who's like, this

0:04:54.600 --> 0:04:57.720
<v Speaker 1>is my crew, because if you have spent a lot

0:04:57.720 --> 0:05:00.560
<v Speaker 1>of time on a crew, it's just really good. I'm Carmen.

0:05:00.600 --> 0:05:02.600
<v Speaker 1>You spent your first was that your first time working

0:05:02.640 --> 0:05:05.520
<v Speaker 1>with the film crew when you were down in Texas?

0:05:05.800 --> 0:05:07.640
<v Speaker 2>No, we did it here in Atlanta. We did it

0:05:08.000 --> 0:05:13.120
<v Speaker 2>at the Atlanta Capital. That was with Lisa from The

0:05:13.160 --> 0:05:14.679
<v Speaker 2>Fake Doctor's Real Friends production.

0:05:15.240 --> 0:05:15.400
<v Speaker 1>Yea.

0:05:15.640 --> 0:05:17.400
<v Speaker 2>And of course I've been on I've been on a

0:05:17.440 --> 0:05:21.000
<v Speaker 2>set when we did our Toyota film, our Toyota commercial,

0:05:21.600 --> 0:05:25.479
<v Speaker 2>and I've been on another set with Violet when she

0:05:25.600 --> 0:05:29.600
<v Speaker 2>shot her music video for Fade de Grae, the cover

0:05:29.760 --> 0:05:33.400
<v Speaker 2>of the song Fade Degrae. So I've seen a couple,

0:05:33.680 --> 0:05:35.920
<v Speaker 2>you know, small productions, but that was my first time

0:05:35.960 --> 0:05:38.800
<v Speaker 2>actually working on a production and a lot of fun.

0:05:39.880 --> 0:05:41.920
<v Speaker 1>It is a lot of fun, and I think when

0:05:41.960 --> 0:05:44.560
<v Speaker 1>you're coming back to the same cruise repeatedly, there's a

0:05:44.680 --> 0:05:49.120
<v Speaker 1>level of artistic creativity and pushing one another that you

0:05:49.160 --> 0:05:51.760
<v Speaker 1>get to do. Uh. And he's worked with Giant on

0:05:51.800 --> 0:05:53.680
<v Speaker 1>all of this films. So he also shoots The Northman

0:05:53.839 --> 0:05:54.680
<v Speaker 1>and The Witch.

0:05:55.160 --> 0:05:58.680
<v Speaker 2>Does he shoot the uh, the Nose Frauty movie?

0:05:59.040 --> 0:06:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yep, Wow, that's awesome. Yeah. Well, you know, I'll

0:06:04.000 --> 0:06:06.920
<v Speaker 1>do some deeper research on Jarn's you talk about him

0:06:06.920 --> 0:06:08.400
<v Speaker 1>when we talk about the north film, because I actually

0:06:08.400 --> 0:06:10.160
<v Speaker 1>had a lot of questions and we're going to get

0:06:10.160 --> 0:06:12.960
<v Speaker 1>into some color theory on this black and white film

0:06:13.000 --> 0:06:15.359
<v Speaker 1>because I have a lot of thoughts about that. Okay,

0:06:15.400 --> 0:06:18.400
<v Speaker 1>So Mark Korn does the music. It's got a respectable

0:06:18.480 --> 0:06:20.640
<v Speaker 1>runtime of one hundred and nine minutes. I thought this

0:06:20.680 --> 0:06:24.560
<v Speaker 1>movie was longer. I remember it feeling very long. It

0:06:24.040 --> 0:06:30.240
<v Speaker 1>does because of the stress Hunters. It's really chaotic. How

0:06:30.279 --> 0:06:31.200
<v Speaker 1>do you feel about the run time?

0:06:31.600 --> 0:06:34.760
<v Speaker 2>The tension builds very slowly throughout the movie, just like

0:06:34.800 --> 0:06:38.159
<v Speaker 2>in The Witch. Similarly, there's a lot of similarities between

0:06:38.160 --> 0:06:40.680
<v Speaker 2>this movie and The Witch. I find there and we

0:06:40.720 --> 0:06:43.760
<v Speaker 2>are going to hark. I also wanted to say, Jaron,

0:06:44.040 --> 0:06:48.680
<v Speaker 2>he is the one who pushed Robert Egger's to shoot

0:06:48.720 --> 0:06:52.560
<v Speaker 2>in this almost square aspect ratio. So it's like one

0:06:52.600 --> 0:06:56.919
<v Speaker 2>point one nine to one aspect ratio with black and

0:06:56.960 --> 0:07:00.919
<v Speaker 2>white thirty five millimeter film on these like teak lenses.

0:07:01.480 --> 0:07:04.400
<v Speaker 2>So I think that's where some of the budget went

0:07:04.680 --> 0:07:08.960
<v Speaker 2>in comparison to The Witch. This was also shot in Canada,

0:07:09.040 --> 0:07:13.400
<v Speaker 2>Nova Scotia. It was shot at Cape Horseshoe is what

0:07:13.440 --> 0:07:16.760
<v Speaker 2>it's called, and they built the lighthouse themselves, which I

0:07:16.800 --> 0:07:18.240
<v Speaker 2>found to be very interesting.

0:07:19.040 --> 0:07:23.320
<v Speaker 1>I cannot wait to talk to you about Edgar's dollhouse theory,

0:07:24.040 --> 0:07:26.840
<v Speaker 1>especially when it was so much more prominent in this

0:07:26.920 --> 0:07:29.520
<v Speaker 1>movie than in The Witch, and I thought it was

0:07:29.560 --> 0:07:30.239
<v Speaker 1>used a great effect.

0:07:30.320 --> 0:07:30.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah The Witch.

0:07:30.720 --> 0:07:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so let's talk about first reactions and experiences watching

0:07:34.600 --> 0:07:36.680
<v Speaker 1>this film. Do you remember the first time you saw

0:07:36.720 --> 0:07:37.160
<v Speaker 1>this film?

0:07:38.720 --> 0:07:44.080
<v Speaker 2>Yes? I actually okay, so I just recently watched this

0:07:44.120 --> 0:07:46.360
<v Speaker 2>for the first time. I want to say, back in

0:07:46.600 --> 0:07:52.080
<v Speaker 2>late September early October, and it was around the same

0:07:52.120 --> 0:07:57.320
<v Speaker 2>time I actually watched the first episode of the Uzumaki anime,

0:07:57.360 --> 0:08:00.000
<v Speaker 2>which first episode was great and then it went on

0:08:00.040 --> 0:08:05.840
<v Speaker 2>on a downward spiral. And I remember thinking after I

0:08:05.880 --> 0:08:09.480
<v Speaker 2>watched the Uzamaki first episode and then watching this, I

0:08:09.520 --> 0:08:12.200
<v Speaker 2>remember thinking, Wow, there's a lot of similarities between this

0:08:12.440 --> 0:08:16.320
<v Speaker 2>and Uzumaki. Obviously they're different subject matter, but they are

0:08:16.360 --> 0:08:20.480
<v Speaker 2>both cosmic horrors, and they are both in black and white.

0:08:20.760 --> 0:08:23.360
<v Speaker 2>And the kind of droning, especially at the beginning of

0:08:23.400 --> 0:08:27.640
<v Speaker 2>the movie, you have that like droning horn sound that

0:08:28.040 --> 0:08:31.440
<v Speaker 2>is played throughout all kind of gave me same like

0:08:31.920 --> 0:08:35.520
<v Speaker 2>atmospheric vibes of the Uza Maki and this is just

0:08:35.559 --> 0:08:38.840
<v Speaker 2>like The Witch is another movie that is very much vibes.

0:08:39.160 --> 0:08:41.040
<v Speaker 2>There's a lot of vibes and a lot of atmosphere

0:08:41.080 --> 0:08:41.640
<v Speaker 2>going on here.

0:08:42.040 --> 0:08:45.760
<v Speaker 1>Both get into some weird cerebral body horror as well.

0:08:46.480 --> 0:08:50.440
<v Speaker 1>I consider The Mermaid vagina body horror. I'm just gonna look,

0:08:50.520 --> 0:08:52.040
<v Speaker 1>you guys, it's so weird.

0:08:51.800 --> 0:08:53.440
<v Speaker 2>The tentacles and all of that.

0:08:53.920 --> 0:08:56.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, definitely, you see a lot of reputation there.

0:08:56.880 --> 0:08:57.120
<v Speaker 3>Okay.

0:08:57.160 --> 0:08:59.839
<v Speaker 1>I first saw this at TIFF and there was a

0:08:59.880 --> 0:09:03.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of buzz obviously coming after Can and the question

0:09:03.440 --> 0:09:06.240
<v Speaker 1>was sort of, will general audiences like this like they

0:09:06.400 --> 0:09:09.079
<v Speaker 1>liked The Witch. The answer was for a lot of

0:09:09.160 --> 0:09:13.080
<v Speaker 1>critics was no. I think box office suggests that's true.

0:09:13.440 --> 0:09:17.400
<v Speaker 1>It's not as in my mind accessible as The Witch.

0:09:17.520 --> 0:09:21.360
<v Speaker 1>But I remember leaning back in the theater and being like, oh,

0:09:21.440 --> 0:09:24.920
<v Speaker 1>this is brilliant, like just for I like a movie

0:09:24.960 --> 0:09:28.880
<v Speaker 1>that makes me feel And I think, yeah, that's not

0:09:28.920 --> 0:09:33.360
<v Speaker 1>an experience everyone vibes with, particularly and perhaps I've been

0:09:33.360 --> 0:09:35.160
<v Speaker 1>talking to a lot of folks who don't like horror,

0:09:35.480 --> 0:09:37.920
<v Speaker 1>almost all men, by the way, who were like, I

0:09:37.960 --> 0:09:40.360
<v Speaker 1>am not interested in horror films. I don't want to

0:09:40.400 --> 0:09:44.960
<v Speaker 1>watch Aaron and abou our producers here don't like horror.

0:09:45.040 --> 0:09:48.720
<v Speaker 1>They we were like passes to nostraati. They're like, well, literally,

0:09:48.760 --> 0:09:49.880
<v Speaker 1>pass We're not interested.

0:09:51.120 --> 0:09:53.199
<v Speaker 2>My boyfriend not at all interested.

0:09:53.520 --> 0:09:57.160
<v Speaker 1>Really, Okay, so this is fast. Please write in and

0:09:57.160 --> 0:10:00.000
<v Speaker 1>tell us if you're a man who doesn't enjoy horror

0:10:00.080 --> 0:10:02.679
<v Speaker 1>or why. I just want to hear more about this.

0:10:02.800 --> 0:10:05.560
<v Speaker 1>A lot of the guys I've talked to have an

0:10:05.600 --> 0:10:09.640
<v Speaker 1>issue there, like I don't like the feeling of being terrified.

0:10:09.800 --> 0:10:13.120
<v Speaker 1>It puts me on edge. I can't relax. I don't

0:10:13.200 --> 0:10:17.640
<v Speaker 1>understand why you're having fun with this. I think women

0:10:17.679 --> 0:10:19.920
<v Speaker 1>are always afraid and being.

0:10:19.800 --> 0:10:21.720
<v Speaker 2>Able exactly what I was gonna say.

0:10:22.160 --> 0:10:24.720
<v Speaker 1>Being able to practice it in a safe environment where

0:10:24.760 --> 0:10:28.559
<v Speaker 1>you can't actually be hurt is a wonderful fun bonding

0:10:28.600 --> 0:10:31.280
<v Speaker 1>experience with your galp hoals And because and we sort

0:10:31.320 --> 0:10:32.920
<v Speaker 1>of talked about this before on some of our other

0:10:33.040 --> 0:10:36.280
<v Speaker 1>horror episodes, but having a final girl that you can

0:10:36.320 --> 0:10:38.959
<v Speaker 1>really lean into you and love is such a joy.

0:10:40.120 --> 0:10:42.760
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's what makes horror great. And with

0:10:42.920 --> 0:10:46.800
<v Speaker 1>that thought in mind, I would talk about like the

0:10:47.360 --> 0:10:52.079
<v Speaker 1>gender identity in Egger's films, if we have what He's

0:10:52.120 --> 0:10:54.160
<v Speaker 1>like again. Eggars didn't call it a feminist film, but

0:10:54.200 --> 0:10:56.839
<v Speaker 1>said that he was proud or excited. I can't remember

0:10:56.840 --> 0:10:59.880
<v Speaker 1>his exact adjective. That people felt like The Witch was

0:11:00.120 --> 0:11:04.200
<v Speaker 1>feminist film, and to me, I think you could categorize

0:11:04.240 --> 0:11:07.000
<v Speaker 1>it as that there's some possibly if there aren't that

0:11:07.000 --> 0:11:09.720
<v Speaker 1>many women involved directly in the storytelling, is it feminist.

0:11:10.679 --> 0:11:15.040
<v Speaker 1>I think the narrative I would put is leans heavily

0:11:15.080 --> 0:11:17.320
<v Speaker 1>into a lot of feminist shows. Specifically, if you're looking

0:11:17.400 --> 0:11:21.440
<v Speaker 1>at the wich is an evil entity in America. Okay, great, Absolutely,

0:11:21.520 --> 0:11:25.040
<v Speaker 1>this film is absolutely about toxic masculinity. He said that

0:11:25.080 --> 0:11:27.520
<v Speaker 1>he sort of stumbled upon that as they were writing,

0:11:27.559 --> 0:11:31.320
<v Speaker 1>so not his agenda in starting the project. He saw

0:11:31.440 --> 0:11:34.160
<v Speaker 1>his brother brought him the story, a real story of

0:11:34.160 --> 0:11:38.600
<v Speaker 1>two men who were like abandoned or something in a lighthouse,

0:11:38.600 --> 0:11:40.720
<v Speaker 1>and they were like, oh, that's an interesting story.

0:11:41.120 --> 0:11:44.760
<v Speaker 2>It's called the Smalls Lighthouse Tragedy. It's a real story

0:11:44.800 --> 0:11:48.120
<v Speaker 2>of an accident that happened at a lighthouse in Wales,

0:11:48.280 --> 0:11:51.800
<v Speaker 2>which I found very interesting. And it was partly inspired

0:11:51.800 --> 0:11:55.679
<v Speaker 2>by the Edgar Allan Poe short story of the same

0:11:55.840 --> 0:11:57.880
<v Speaker 2>name that he never got to finish before he died.

0:11:58.000 --> 0:12:00.840
<v Speaker 2>So he started it like months before death, and then

0:12:01.440 --> 0:12:03.000
<v Speaker 2>and yeah, and then die.

0:12:03.080 --> 0:12:06.720
<v Speaker 1>I love say, I love that Edgars is so into

0:12:06.960 --> 0:12:09.960
<v Speaker 1>historical village. He's such a nerd uh. And then there's

0:12:10.000 --> 0:12:13.680
<v Speaker 1>something I really appreciate and vibe with, Like, you know,

0:12:13.679 --> 0:12:15.679
<v Speaker 1>I Greyl and Poe didn't get to finished. I want

0:12:15.720 --> 0:12:17.520
<v Speaker 1>to do a horror in a lighthouse. I wouldn't need

0:12:17.559 --> 0:12:21.959
<v Speaker 1>turned to that as inspiration. That's beautiful. So he was

0:12:22.000 --> 0:12:24.000
<v Speaker 1>like as we're rioting, and if you're dealing with two

0:12:24.000 --> 0:12:27.280
<v Speaker 1>guys who are isolated in a job that is considered

0:12:27.360 --> 0:12:31.720
<v Speaker 1>rather masculine but also requires a lot of feminine tasks, Yep.

0:12:32.280 --> 0:12:34.640
<v Speaker 2>All placed on Robert Pattins's character.

0:12:36.280 --> 0:12:39.760
<v Speaker 1>Because he's the young and new one and less experienced one,

0:12:39.840 --> 0:12:42.600
<v Speaker 1>and therefore is considered the lesser of the men, and

0:12:42.640 --> 0:12:45.720
<v Speaker 1>so he's forced to do women's work, which he finds

0:12:45.760 --> 0:12:50.720
<v Speaker 1>extremely degrading and keeps bringing it up. And then he

0:12:50.840 --> 0:12:54.360
<v Speaker 1>has a reaction like I think many a woman has

0:12:54.440 --> 0:12:57.000
<v Speaker 1>had in her life for someone's like, oh this isn't

0:12:57.000 --> 0:13:00.080
<v Speaker 1>done well. He was like, bitch, what do you I

0:12:59.840 --> 0:13:04.080
<v Speaker 1>have scrubb Queen's maid could come here and not do

0:13:04.320 --> 0:13:07.480
<v Speaker 1>as good a job as I had you. Oh, he

0:13:07.640 --> 0:13:11.960
<v Speaker 1>was angry, he was upset. And because of that you

0:13:11.960 --> 0:13:16.000
<v Speaker 1>get like you do start like stripping away women as

0:13:16.080 --> 0:13:23.120
<v Speaker 1>Alia dog. Yes, yes, the stripping women away. It totally

0:13:23.320 --> 0:13:27.760
<v Speaker 1>is Carmen, And there's like there's it's just such an

0:13:27.800 --> 0:13:31.920
<v Speaker 1>interesting way to explore like what is masculinity? Right? And

0:13:31.960 --> 0:13:34.520
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of times when people try to

0:13:34.559 --> 0:13:38.040
<v Speaker 1>explore toxic masculinity, what you're doing is you're looking at

0:13:38.080 --> 0:13:41.040
<v Speaker 1>the end result of it, which is to say, oh,

0:13:41.240 --> 0:13:46.079
<v Speaker 1>violence against women is like the root of toxic but

0:13:46.200 --> 0:13:49.400
<v Speaker 1>really it's like the root of toxic masculinity is an

0:13:49.400 --> 0:13:52.719
<v Speaker 1>insecurity in men, right, Like it's it's your own insecurities

0:13:54.280 --> 0:13:56.440
<v Speaker 1>of what it means to be a man. These unfair

0:13:57.360 --> 0:13:59.600
<v Speaker 1>societal pressures and been created to put on other men

0:13:59.600 --> 0:14:01.040
<v Speaker 1>of like what does it mean to be a man?

0:14:01.080 --> 0:14:03.280
<v Speaker 1>And throughout the film you get a back and forth

0:14:03.320 --> 0:14:06.520
<v Speaker 1>exchange of that. Okay, so you have younger guy comes

0:14:06.520 --> 0:14:09.440
<v Speaker 1>saying clearly you're inferior. Okay, but I'm physically stronger than

0:14:09.480 --> 0:14:12.800
<v Speaker 1>you are a man, I'm superior. Okay. Well I have more

0:14:13.040 --> 0:14:16.439
<v Speaker 1>experience and I'm more intelligent than you, but I'm more

0:14:16.440 --> 0:14:19.920
<v Speaker 1>modern and I'm more adept at working in these situations. Okay,

0:14:19.960 --> 0:14:22.800
<v Speaker 1>but it's literally my lighthouse line and your boss. I

0:14:22.880 --> 0:14:25.520
<v Speaker 1>have more experience than you. I'm on top. Okay, but

0:14:25.600 --> 0:14:27.800
<v Speaker 1>I could Okay, And then you get a twist, so

0:14:27.840 --> 0:14:29.720
<v Speaker 1>we've run out of things to top each other with.

0:14:30.680 --> 0:14:33.800
<v Speaker 1>So now it's yeah, and I'm lonely and I hate

0:14:33.800 --> 0:14:35.840
<v Speaker 1>this place, and this place is so hard. Now I'm

0:14:35.840 --> 0:14:38.320
<v Speaker 1>codependent on you and I have and Okay, so we're

0:14:38.320 --> 0:14:41.359
<v Speaker 1>sparking up a friendship, but we can only bond.

0:14:41.640 --> 0:14:43.400
<v Speaker 2>Each other while we're drunk and dancing.

0:14:43.720 --> 0:14:46.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we only bond with each other through being super drunk,

0:14:47.520 --> 0:14:50.720
<v Speaker 1>through fighting, and once we reach the depths of that,

0:14:50.800 --> 0:14:54.560
<v Speaker 1>our repression comes out. You know, we're repressed. We're not

0:14:54.600 --> 0:14:56.960
<v Speaker 1>He's not even supposed to masturbate, like, which is crazy.

0:14:57.120 --> 0:14:59.000
<v Speaker 1>It's like, bro, we're alone on an island with no

0:14:59.080 --> 0:15:03.440
<v Speaker 1>TV and apparently enough books, books and teens. Day would

0:15:03.440 --> 0:15:06.280
<v Speaker 1>have been a dream for me. Women would have nailed this.

0:15:06.400 --> 0:15:08.800
<v Speaker 1>I just want to say, if women had been had

0:15:08.880 --> 0:15:10.880
<v Speaker 1>just been women at the Lighthouse, this is a very

0:15:10.920 --> 0:15:16.320
<v Speaker 1>different movie. Last Yeah, totally. It's just quiet and there

0:15:16.320 --> 0:15:19.520
<v Speaker 1>are no men, and it's scenic and beautiful and it's

0:15:19.520 --> 0:15:21.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna storm tonight. I have books and good food. We

0:15:21.960 --> 0:15:22.160
<v Speaker 1>can go.

0:15:22.680 --> 0:15:23.160
<v Speaker 2>We're good.

0:15:23.720 --> 0:15:27.760
<v Speaker 1>We're truly living a blessed life. About your coachy sweater weather,

0:15:28.160 --> 0:15:30.200
<v Speaker 1>stop it. I'm fine. The only thing I'm worried about

0:15:30.240 --> 0:15:32.840
<v Speaker 1>is cleanliness, and we can figure it out. So yeah,

0:15:32.880 --> 0:15:36.520
<v Speaker 1>So I'm really curious to hear your thoughts on both

0:15:36.880 --> 0:15:41.600
<v Speaker 1>the way masculinity is portrayed throughout the film and also

0:15:42.000 --> 0:15:45.800
<v Speaker 1>the way these two specific performers sort of go back

0:15:45.840 --> 0:15:48.600
<v Speaker 1>and forth in there, like it's a really interesting pairing

0:15:49.880 --> 0:15:55.600
<v Speaker 1>Robert Pattinson and Willem Dafoe. Willem Dafoe is, you know,

0:15:55.600 --> 0:15:58.760
<v Speaker 1>known for doing these big, over the top characters. She's

0:15:58.800 --> 0:16:02.720
<v Speaker 1>got this incredible thing, and Robert has, you know, post

0:16:02.760 --> 0:16:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Twilight has been very interesting and sort of the same

0:16:05.200 --> 0:16:10.000
<v Speaker 1>way that Daniel Bradcliffe has been on choosing weird roles

0:16:10.000 --> 0:16:12.840
<v Speaker 1>that just speak to and challenge, and he's not even

0:16:12.880 --> 0:16:16.320
<v Speaker 1>afraid of going into something like a Batman a blockbuster

0:16:16.640 --> 0:16:18.720
<v Speaker 1>as long as he can be weird about it. He's like,

0:16:18.800 --> 0:16:22.360
<v Speaker 1>I'll be there. And so to allow these two really

0:16:22.440 --> 0:16:26.440
<v Speaker 1>incredible performers to be at the peak of weird talking

0:16:26.440 --> 0:16:29.200
<v Speaker 1>about masculinity like, I just think it's a stroke of brilliance.

0:16:29.240 --> 0:16:30.040
<v Speaker 1>How did it touch you?

0:16:30.560 --> 0:16:31.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:16:31.120 --> 0:16:31.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:16:31.360 --> 0:16:34.600
<v Speaker 2>And it's interesting too because they both personally reached out

0:16:34.640 --> 0:16:38.760
<v Speaker 2>to Robert Eggers after they saw The Witch and told

0:16:38.880 --> 0:16:40.880
<v Speaker 2>Robert Eggers that they wanted to be involved in his

0:16:40.960 --> 0:16:41.720
<v Speaker 2>next project.

0:16:42.080 --> 0:16:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Robert, what a dream? What a yeah, right, what a

0:16:46.640 --> 0:16:49.120
<v Speaker 1>dream to get these too? Yeah?

0:16:49.400 --> 0:16:52.200
<v Speaker 2>What a dream to get these two big names in

0:16:52.240 --> 0:16:55.160
<v Speaker 2>Hollywood for your next film that are just like down

0:16:55.200 --> 0:16:59.720
<v Speaker 2>for whatever and super excited to work on your next project.

0:17:00.480 --> 0:17:02.960
<v Speaker 2>You know, I want to tie back the conversation of

0:17:02.960 --> 0:17:07.639
<v Speaker 2>toxic masculinity. And I don't know if this exactly answers

0:17:07.680 --> 0:17:12.359
<v Speaker 2>the question, but the subject of toxic masculinity being like

0:17:12.440 --> 0:17:15.399
<v Speaker 2>the centerpiece of the movie, I think it ties in

0:17:15.800 --> 0:17:19.480
<v Speaker 2>also into how men, just like we were also talking

0:17:19.480 --> 0:17:22.320
<v Speaker 2>about it at the top, how men don't like horror

0:17:22.359 --> 0:17:27.119
<v Speaker 2>movies is because not only because they don't like to

0:17:27.960 --> 0:17:31.600
<v Speaker 2>feel afraid, but feeling afraid is something that I think

0:17:31.720 --> 0:17:34.720
<v Speaker 2>challenges a lot of men's masculinity in a way that

0:17:34.760 --> 0:17:38.080
<v Speaker 2>they're not comfortable with. And I'm not calling anyone out,

0:17:38.280 --> 0:17:39.160
<v Speaker 2>you know, but.

0:17:39.800 --> 0:17:40.960
<v Speaker 1>No, but I think that's fair.

0:17:42.240 --> 0:17:44.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And I you know, another thing I wanted to

0:17:44.840 --> 0:17:46.840
<v Speaker 2>add to that too, is like all of my gay

0:17:47.080 --> 0:17:49.679
<v Speaker 2>male friends love horror.

0:17:49.840 --> 0:17:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Oh my god, that's so true.

0:17:53.200 --> 0:17:57.480
<v Speaker 2>And it's I think because they are not tied to

0:17:59.040 --> 0:18:02.200
<v Speaker 2>masculinity in the same way is that, you know, sis,

0:18:02.240 --> 0:18:03.840
<v Speaker 2>straight men are tied to masculinity.

0:18:03.840 --> 0:18:10.240
<v Speaker 1>They're not asked to perform the ideology of masculinity exact way,

0:18:10.280 --> 0:18:13.040
<v Speaker 1>so our community sort of allows them to you feel

0:18:13.040 --> 0:18:15.280
<v Speaker 1>how you feel, Okay, wow, Okay, go on.

0:18:16.160 --> 0:18:21.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Yeah, So in the movie, I just think that

0:18:21.240 --> 0:18:24.280
<v Speaker 2>they do such a great job, you know, with monologuing

0:18:24.320 --> 0:18:28.040
<v Speaker 2>each other and and kind of you can with each

0:18:28.240 --> 0:18:31.760
<v Speaker 2>thing that Willem Dafoe's character says to Robert Pattins's character,

0:18:32.280 --> 0:18:34.960
<v Speaker 2>you can just see in Robert Pattens's face, like how

0:18:35.000 --> 0:18:38.159
<v Speaker 2>annoyed he's getting with Willem Dafoe, and that tension is

0:18:38.200 --> 0:18:41.320
<v Speaker 2>just slowly and slowly building until they finally, you know,

0:18:41.440 --> 0:18:45.520
<v Speaker 2>have this huge fight which is also during a storm,

0:18:45.760 --> 0:18:48.240
<v Speaker 2>which I think is also a really perfect like symbolism

0:18:48.480 --> 0:18:52.800
<v Speaker 2>of kind of of the anger that men can like

0:18:52.840 --> 0:18:55.719
<v Speaker 2>hold up inside of themselves. It can be very destructive

0:18:56.359 --> 0:18:59.720
<v Speaker 2>and it literally, if I'm not mistaken, it destroys the

0:18:59.760 --> 0:19:03.919
<v Speaker 2>how you know, it destroys where they're where they're staying.

0:19:04.280 --> 0:19:07.159
<v Speaker 2>So there's a lot of like symbolism in the movie

0:19:07.520 --> 0:19:12.560
<v Speaker 2>I find with that and and toxic masculinity, I agree.

0:19:12.800 --> 0:19:16.679
<v Speaker 1>When we come back, we're going to talk about the

0:19:16.680 --> 0:19:23.439
<v Speaker 1>black and white, the aspect ratio, and what does the

0:19:23.520 --> 0:19:28.680
<v Speaker 1>lighthouse mean? What's happening up there? Is it is it real?

0:19:28.840 --> 0:19:31.119
<v Speaker 1>Is it magic? What what's going on?

0:19:31.320 --> 0:19:32.119
<v Speaker 2>Is it dreams?

0:19:32.640 --> 0:19:46.680
<v Speaker 1>Is it dreams? We'll be right back. Okay, and we're

0:19:46.720 --> 0:19:50.480
<v Speaker 1>back all right. So we've been talking about the ways

0:19:50.560 --> 0:19:54.680
<v Speaker 1>toxic masculinity are explored throughout the film. I want to

0:19:54.720 --> 0:19:56.800
<v Speaker 1>talk a little bit about the visual imagery and work

0:19:56.840 --> 0:20:00.440
<v Speaker 1>our way back to this idea. So yeah, I think

0:20:00.480 --> 0:20:04.440
<v Speaker 1>it was an inspired choice to shoot in this aspect ratio.

0:20:04.640 --> 0:20:09.640
<v Speaker 1>It's almost a perfect square. It did make projecting it difficult.

0:20:09.760 --> 0:20:11.399
<v Speaker 1>You had to have a screen of a certain size

0:20:11.400 --> 0:20:12.520
<v Speaker 1>in order to shoot it.

0:20:12.760 --> 0:20:15.960
<v Speaker 2>And I'm also curious what the IMAX experience would have

0:20:15.960 --> 0:20:17.400
<v Speaker 2>been like with this movie.

0:20:18.040 --> 0:20:20.560
<v Speaker 1>I saw it in an Imax projection. I'm pretty sure

0:20:20.600 --> 0:20:23.800
<v Speaker 1>that was an IMAX projected theater. My screening it, the

0:20:23.800 --> 0:20:26.720
<v Speaker 1>screenings at any film festival, but especially one OF's large

0:20:26.720 --> 0:20:30.600
<v Speaker 1>at TIFF is like one of the five Oscar qualifiers. Immaculate,

0:20:30.760 --> 0:20:35.760
<v Speaker 1>like really really gorgeous, deep deep blacks, like stunning, stunning visually,

0:20:36.240 --> 0:20:38.920
<v Speaker 1>and they, you know, found a way to I think

0:20:38.920 --> 0:20:41.760
<v Speaker 1>they used the classic Kurrasawa I believe. I remember reading

0:20:41.800 --> 0:20:44.440
<v Speaker 1>that effect of putting ink in water to make rain

0:20:44.560 --> 0:20:47.720
<v Speaker 1>pop in a black and white film, right, because the

0:20:47.800 --> 0:20:49.720
<v Speaker 1>rain is gorgeous in it. But it's hard to shoot

0:20:49.800 --> 0:20:51.639
<v Speaker 1>rain in black and white because it just kind of

0:20:51.640 --> 0:20:54.280
<v Speaker 1>looks grainy, so you really have to give it a

0:20:54.280 --> 0:20:57.360
<v Speaker 1>different saturation of color. And this really pushes Eggeries as

0:20:57.440 --> 0:21:00.359
<v Speaker 1>a director to shoot in black and white. It's not

0:21:01.920 --> 0:21:05.960
<v Speaker 1>for those of you unfamiliar with like filming processes. The

0:21:06.000 --> 0:21:08.399
<v Speaker 1>best way to explain this is to encourage you to

0:21:08.440 --> 0:21:10.919
<v Speaker 1>look up with picture of the set of the Monsters

0:21:10.960 --> 0:21:13.920
<v Speaker 1>from the nineteen sixties. It is pastel as hell.

0:21:14.280 --> 0:21:16.240
<v Speaker 2>It is light the Monsters.

0:21:16.800 --> 0:21:19.159
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so if you look at the Monsters set photos

0:21:19.520 --> 0:21:22.640
<v Speaker 1>from the sixties and seventies, so the Monsters were shot

0:21:22.640 --> 0:21:26.240
<v Speaker 1>in black and white, but their set is almost pestel.

0:21:26.359 --> 0:21:30.080
<v Speaker 1>You can also do this with looking at old black

0:21:30.119 --> 0:21:34.000
<v Speaker 1>and white makeup tests. In color women wore green lipstick

0:21:34.119 --> 0:21:36.879
<v Speaker 1>to appear red on screen, So you have to be

0:21:37.000 --> 0:21:40.040
<v Speaker 1>so in your bag on your color theory to shoot

0:21:40.080 --> 0:21:42.560
<v Speaker 1>in black and white. Well, it is a challenge a

0:21:42.600 --> 0:21:45.199
<v Speaker 1>lot of directors get excited about, but it's difficult to

0:21:45.280 --> 0:21:48.560
<v Speaker 1>pull off. I thought Eggers did a really great job

0:21:49.040 --> 0:21:52.840
<v Speaker 1>of finding like such a great balance. Everything is very visible,

0:21:53.080 --> 0:21:57.680
<v Speaker 1>the contrasts are like really strong. This is very technically

0:21:57.760 --> 0:22:00.879
<v Speaker 1>difficult work to do, and I thought it was beautiful.

0:22:00.920 --> 0:22:05.600
<v Speaker 1>And the square framing of the film highlights the claustrophobia

0:22:05.720 --> 0:22:07.600
<v Speaker 1>in such a way that it like, I have a

0:22:07.640 --> 0:22:10.240
<v Speaker 1>fear of claustrophobia. I don't like being in small or

0:22:10.320 --> 0:22:14.439
<v Speaker 1>tight spaces. And I think by like, there was a

0:22:14.640 --> 0:22:18.280
<v Speaker 1>there's a shot where Robert is up in the lighthouse

0:22:18.400 --> 0:22:21.399
<v Speaker 1>obviously not touching the light yet because he's not alive,

0:22:23.080 --> 0:22:28.080
<v Speaker 1>and Dafoe is climbing up the ladder, and uh, it's

0:22:28.119 --> 0:22:31.960
<v Speaker 1>two separate shots. So one shot of Dafoe looking down

0:22:32.040 --> 0:22:35.440
<v Speaker 1>on him, Robert is standing above him. At this point

0:22:35.480 --> 0:22:38.280
<v Speaker 1>in the film is still pretty early. I would say

0:22:38.320 --> 0:22:40.639
<v Speaker 1>the film is divided almost into two parts. It's or

0:22:40.680 --> 0:22:43.959
<v Speaker 1>maybe three. It's like his early arrival, and then you

0:22:44.000 --> 0:22:47.600
<v Speaker 1>get this time when they're sort of bonded to the

0:22:47.600 --> 0:22:49.760
<v Speaker 1>time he's supposed to leave, and then you get off

0:22:50.000 --> 0:22:53.840
<v Speaker 1>full hour, which is insane. It's so much time between

0:22:53.800 --> 0:22:55.800
<v Speaker 1>the time he's supposed to leave and doesn't get picked

0:22:55.880 --> 0:22:58.840
<v Speaker 1>up to the end. And that's where really the downward

0:22:58.880 --> 0:23:02.960
<v Speaker 1>spiral just goes completely out of control. So in this shot,

0:23:03.240 --> 0:23:06.159
<v Speaker 1>these two solo shots, you're bouncing back and forth, and

0:23:06.320 --> 0:23:10.520
<v Speaker 1>the eye line is diagonal, it's across the frame. When

0:23:10.560 --> 0:23:13.119
<v Speaker 1>you're cutting between the two of them. They feel like

0:23:13.160 --> 0:23:16.920
<v Speaker 1>they're standing like Robert is standing on top of Defot's shoulders,

0:23:17.320 --> 0:23:20.359
<v Speaker 1>almost because there's such a tight frame that when you

0:23:20.440 --> 0:23:24.680
<v Speaker 1>have someone looking across and down, it like shoots their

0:23:24.720 --> 0:23:29.600
<v Speaker 1>height way up visually, and it really makes you like again,

0:23:29.680 --> 0:23:32.800
<v Speaker 1>it just cramps everything together and makes it so tight.

0:23:32.920 --> 0:23:35.880
<v Speaker 1>You feel like you're in this lighthouse and there's literally

0:23:36.440 --> 0:23:40.160
<v Speaker 1>zero reprieve. It never comes. You are always this tight

0:23:40.640 --> 0:23:43.800
<v Speaker 1>and locked in. And I think shooting that way again

0:23:44.119 --> 0:23:47.119
<v Speaker 1>technically difficult when you're used to having all of this space,

0:23:47.160 --> 0:23:49.000
<v Speaker 1>you have a lot of them. You have to use

0:23:49.040 --> 0:23:51.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of economy of space to pull it off

0:23:51.440 --> 0:23:54.600
<v Speaker 1>and make it look good. And so I think what

0:23:54.760 --> 0:23:58.320
<v Speaker 1>really impresses me. I think sophomore films are such a

0:23:58.440 --> 0:24:01.159
<v Speaker 1>challenge to pull off. And if you think, Okay, I'm

0:24:01.200 --> 0:24:06.080
<v Speaker 1>getting really theoretical here, and there's no proof of anything

0:24:06.080 --> 0:24:07.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm about to say, so I feel free to disregard it.

0:24:08.960 --> 0:24:10.879
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a very interesting subject for Egers to

0:24:10.920 --> 0:24:15.119
<v Speaker 1>go from a film he's excited to have people call feminist.

0:24:15.760 --> 0:24:19.399
<v Speaker 1>Being lauded as an extremely successful early director like this

0:24:19.520 --> 0:24:22.159
<v Speaker 1>is huge. You could do one of two things. You

0:24:22.200 --> 0:24:24.879
<v Speaker 1>could take on a great, big studio project, because I'm

0:24:24.880 --> 0:24:28.040
<v Speaker 1>sure they were offered to him. You could repeat and

0:24:28.200 --> 0:24:32.280
<v Speaker 1>lean into becoming a horror director, or you could turn

0:24:32.320 --> 0:24:34.200
<v Speaker 1>your back on all that and say it was really

0:24:34.280 --> 0:24:38.520
<v Speaker 1>important to me is telling stories I'm excited about period,

0:24:38.560 --> 0:24:40.679
<v Speaker 1>and what excites me is writing my own stories. He

0:24:40.840 --> 0:24:45.679
<v Speaker 1>stayed small when he could have. We've seen directors and

0:24:45.680 --> 0:24:47.879
<v Speaker 1>that was really the era of these. Like if you

0:24:47.920 --> 0:24:51.080
<v Speaker 1>think the guy that did Jurassic Park one hit Steven

0:24:51.080 --> 0:24:52.680
<v Speaker 1>spielg wurds like I love you, He's like, great, I'll

0:24:52.720 --> 0:24:54.760
<v Speaker 1>make I'll direct Jurassic Park. Next.

0:24:56.000 --> 0:24:59.640
<v Speaker 2>I read that Robert Eggers was actually being offered lots

0:24:59.680 --> 0:25:04.280
<v Speaker 2>of studio, big studio projects, but he was not interested

0:25:04.320 --> 0:25:08.240
<v Speaker 2>in any of them, and instead his brother Max brought

0:25:08.240 --> 0:25:10.240
<v Speaker 2>this story to him and that's when he really like

0:25:10.240 --> 0:25:12.840
<v Speaker 2>piqued his interest. So he really is like a director

0:25:12.840 --> 0:25:16.840
<v Speaker 2>who seems to choose things that he's passionate about or

0:25:16.880 --> 0:25:21.400
<v Speaker 2>things that he's really interested in, versus what Hollywood wants

0:25:21.480 --> 0:25:22.639
<v Speaker 2>him to do. You know.

0:25:22.880 --> 0:25:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and we saw that in that era, like with

0:25:25.320 --> 0:25:30.320
<v Speaker 1>Gareth Edwards, who directed the new Directsic Park trilogy, was

0:25:30.359 --> 0:25:33.960
<v Speaker 1>also offered Rogue one. Both of those films not as

0:25:33.960 --> 0:25:36.160
<v Speaker 1>well received. But if you were a white man who

0:25:36.160 --> 0:25:40.320
<v Speaker 1>had a successful indie film Rogue one, Yes, but he's

0:25:40.359 --> 0:25:42.880
<v Speaker 1>replaced his director towards the end and they reshoot most

0:25:42.920 --> 0:25:46.320
<v Speaker 1>of it right before it releases. Yeah, one is my

0:25:46.359 --> 0:25:48.639
<v Speaker 1>favorite Star Wars film. But yeah, behind the scenes a

0:25:48.680 --> 0:25:51.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of issues. And to be truthful and honest, it

0:25:51.640 --> 0:25:53.560
<v Speaker 1>is very, very difficult to go for making an indie

0:25:53.600 --> 0:25:57.040
<v Speaker 1>to doing a big studio project because so much more

0:25:57.160 --> 0:25:59.200
<v Speaker 1>is required of you. There's so much more money, there's

0:25:59.240 --> 0:26:02.639
<v Speaker 1>so much more pressure. Oftentimes you're now dealing with stars

0:26:02.680 --> 0:26:05.040
<v Speaker 1>instead of actors who were just excited to work, and

0:26:05.080 --> 0:26:07.320
<v Speaker 1>that comes with the whole other set of conditions. You

0:26:07.359 --> 0:26:09.159
<v Speaker 1>need to know how to speak with and work with

0:26:09.200 --> 0:26:11.800
<v Speaker 1>those people so that you both have their respect and

0:26:11.880 --> 0:26:16.760
<v Speaker 1>their attention slash devotion. Like, it's a very hard it's

0:26:16.880 --> 0:26:19.600
<v Speaker 1>much more political than people think to make a big

0:26:19.600 --> 0:26:24.600
<v Speaker 1>studio film, and so like it makes sense to and

0:26:24.640 --> 0:26:27.040
<v Speaker 1>who I think it takes a really big person, or

0:26:27.080 --> 0:26:28.280
<v Speaker 1>it feels to me like it would take a really

0:26:28.320 --> 0:26:30.800
<v Speaker 1>big person to turn down all of that money, all

0:26:30.880 --> 0:26:34.720
<v Speaker 1>that opportunity, all of that praise to come do something small,

0:26:35.400 --> 0:26:38.800
<v Speaker 1>but to and especially with your sophomore project to land

0:26:38.880 --> 0:26:41.680
<v Speaker 1>that plane is really really difficult. I think he did

0:26:42.000 --> 0:26:43.960
<v Speaker 1>a great job. He gets his brothers in space to

0:26:44.000 --> 0:26:46.280
<v Speaker 1>work on his writing, which I love, and he comes

0:26:46.359 --> 0:26:49.679
<v Speaker 1>up with this idea of like, okay, if we're if

0:26:49.720 --> 0:26:51.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm turning my back on all of that, let me

0:26:51.600 --> 0:26:53.800
<v Speaker 1>really examine what I'm turning like. I really think a

0:26:53.840 --> 0:26:55.679
<v Speaker 1>lot of there's a lot of toxic masculinity. This is

0:26:55.720 --> 0:26:57.879
<v Speaker 1>me too, Era, It's just lining up for me. And

0:26:57.920 --> 0:27:01.480
<v Speaker 1>whether that's a bunch of coincidences or just how the

0:27:01.560 --> 0:27:04.160
<v Speaker 1>universes were happening to unfold. In other words, all these

0:27:04.160 --> 0:27:06.520
<v Speaker 1>things are around, and so of course you're comparing what's

0:27:06.560 --> 0:27:08.320
<v Speaker 1>coming out of this film where you can't say for

0:27:08.359 --> 0:27:10.639
<v Speaker 1>sure that this is what's Ineggar's heart is. He's working

0:27:10.680 --> 0:27:13.760
<v Speaker 1>on it, but it was I think it came an

0:27:13.800 --> 0:27:16.720
<v Speaker 1>interesting time for me as a viewer, I'll say, to

0:27:16.760 --> 0:27:19.240
<v Speaker 1>be exploring all those things. It was really a felt

0:27:19.480 --> 0:27:22.240
<v Speaker 1>uh difficult as a woman to get into this movie.

0:27:22.280 --> 0:27:30.480
<v Speaker 1>At first, the farts are yes, this is a dirty.

0:27:28.680 --> 0:27:31.000
<v Speaker 2>It really is. They really want you to be annoyed

0:27:31.000 --> 0:27:33.560
<v Speaker 2>with Willem Dafoe and just like damn, this old man

0:27:33.680 --> 0:27:38.959
<v Speaker 2>is so crotchety and disgusting, and he's really effective at that,

0:27:39.280 --> 0:27:42.760
<v Speaker 2>you know. But at the same time he also there

0:27:42.760 --> 0:27:46.000
<v Speaker 2>are times when he earns your respect just with his

0:27:46.240 --> 0:27:50.479
<v Speaker 2>wisdom and like the knowledge that he has of being

0:27:50.520 --> 0:27:54.600
<v Speaker 2>a seafarer somebody who lives on an isolated island, Like

0:27:54.600 --> 0:27:57.600
<v Speaker 2>he knows what he's talking about. But he's also very,

0:27:57.680 --> 0:27:58.560
<v Speaker 2>very hard to deal with.

0:27:59.480 --> 0:28:02.639
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, here's another thing that's interesting. When you're doing two

0:28:02.760 --> 0:28:05.480
<v Speaker 1>actors in a show like this, so there's there's no

0:28:05.640 --> 0:28:08.920
<v Speaker 1>supporting castors. There's excuse me. There is a mermaid who's

0:28:08.920 --> 0:28:12.040
<v Speaker 1>played by a woman who is here and she but

0:28:12.119 --> 0:28:15.000
<v Speaker 1>she's not giving a lot of interaction, right, Like the

0:28:15.160 --> 0:28:17.800
<v Speaker 1>thing she's almost all of her shots are like one shots.

0:28:17.880 --> 0:28:21.320
<v Speaker 1>It's just her, you know, she's isolated, almost like these birds,

0:28:21.359 --> 0:28:25.400
<v Speaker 1>until maybe she's pulled into it's like maybe Robert's hands

0:28:25.400 --> 0:28:26.399
<v Speaker 1>are there or something like that.

0:28:26.480 --> 0:28:30.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but in the sex scene, I.

0:28:30.000 --> 0:28:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Mean, I loved that. The Twilight girlies it Robert's doing

0:28:34.080 --> 0:28:38.239
<v Speaker 1>what in this movie? We'll be there and they were like,

0:28:39.120 --> 0:28:42.560
<v Speaker 1>he is a masturbating a shirtless his asses out a

0:28:42.560 --> 0:28:47.400
<v Speaker 1>little bit. Enjoy Listen. He's beautiful even when he's that filthy.

0:28:47.440 --> 0:28:49.880
<v Speaker 1>I have many Okay, so one, you can smell Robert

0:28:49.880 --> 0:28:53.400
<v Speaker 1>Egger's films, and that's something we're seeing a lot. It's

0:28:53.400 --> 0:28:55.680
<v Speaker 1>things that people who've seen No Satu are already commenting

0:28:55.760 --> 0:28:59.320
<v Speaker 1>on the fact that you can almost smell how dirty

0:28:59.360 --> 0:29:03.960
<v Speaker 1>the film is. When Robert goes just throw the absolutely

0:29:04.040 --> 0:29:06.000
<v Speaker 1>not this is a film my life. I've ever seen

0:29:06.000 --> 0:29:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Aggers's film in forty I don't need to smell it.

0:29:08.240 --> 0:29:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Oh gross. When Robert throws the shit over the side

0:29:11.440 --> 0:29:14.440
<v Speaker 1>and it blows back up into his face, I was like,

0:29:15.240 --> 0:29:18.000
<v Speaker 1>I was having such a hard time. But again, if

0:29:18.040 --> 0:29:19.760
<v Speaker 1>we go back to this core idea of this is

0:29:19.760 --> 0:29:22.840
<v Speaker 1>an exploration of masculinity and what it means to be

0:29:22.880 --> 0:29:26.640
<v Speaker 1>an or what two men thinks it means to be

0:29:26.720 --> 0:29:30.960
<v Speaker 1>a man, and they're going and their ideas are constantly

0:29:31.000 --> 0:29:33.280
<v Speaker 1>a conflict in war with each other. Picking up on

0:29:33.320 --> 0:29:36.800
<v Speaker 1>what you said about Defoe's performance, there are times where

0:29:36.800 --> 0:29:38.600
<v Speaker 1>you're really not sure if this is a guy who's like,

0:29:38.600 --> 0:29:41.160
<v Speaker 1>I need to put you through your paces because this

0:29:41.200 --> 0:29:43.880
<v Speaker 1>is a difficult job and I've been here for a while,

0:29:43.920 --> 0:29:45.400
<v Speaker 1>so screw you. I'm not doing all the story. If

0:29:45.400 --> 0:29:47.680
<v Speaker 1>you're young, you can do it like get to work,

0:29:48.080 --> 0:29:52.080
<v Speaker 1>or it is my intention to drive you literally mad

0:29:52.360 --> 0:29:55.800
<v Speaker 1>because it's fun for me. Right, You cannot tell, and

0:29:55.880 --> 0:29:58.480
<v Speaker 1>it feels like it changes from time to time, which

0:29:58.520 --> 0:30:03.840
<v Speaker 1>is something I learned recently on American Psycho. Defoe in

0:30:03.880 --> 0:30:07.479
<v Speaker 1>that film plays three different versions of his character, so

0:30:07.520 --> 0:30:10.640
<v Speaker 1>they would have him do three takes. Right, So the

0:30:10.680 --> 0:30:15.880
<v Speaker 1>first take it is like he believes everything that Christian

0:30:15.880 --> 0:30:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Bale's character is saying, he doesn't believe anything, and the

0:30:19.960 --> 0:30:22.360
<v Speaker 1>third take he doesn't know what to believe, and then

0:30:22.400 --> 0:30:25.600
<v Speaker 1>they would mix up those takes, so you get a

0:30:25.760 --> 0:30:30.760
<v Speaker 1>very confused, unsure off foot character. I have mixed feelings

0:30:30.800 --> 0:30:35.640
<v Speaker 1>about that As somebody who studied directing, I think, yeah,

0:30:35.680 --> 0:30:37.640
<v Speaker 1>a part of me is like, it feels disrespectful to

0:30:37.680 --> 0:30:39.720
<v Speaker 1>the actor not to give them the space to make

0:30:39.760 --> 0:30:43.480
<v Speaker 1>these choices to create a character. And anybody who's edited

0:30:43.520 --> 0:30:47.120
<v Speaker 1>a film knows you can absolutely make beautiful or destroy

0:30:47.240 --> 0:30:50.360
<v Speaker 1>a performance within an edit. I think they did a

0:30:50.400 --> 0:30:52.880
<v Speaker 1>great job with it. In the end. It turned out

0:30:52.920 --> 0:30:55.400
<v Speaker 1>to be a decision that works for the movie. But

0:30:55.600 --> 0:30:59.400
<v Speaker 1>I imagine Edgar sort of gave him the space to

0:30:59.400 --> 0:31:01.520
<v Speaker 1>make these choices and it works just as well here

0:31:01.560 --> 0:31:04.360
<v Speaker 1>with somebody who is maybe all three of these things

0:31:04.400 --> 0:31:07.920
<v Speaker 1>at different times. And that's also very legit for the character.

0:31:08.640 --> 0:31:10.880
<v Speaker 1>It makes everything Robert gets to do like you are

0:31:11.040 --> 0:31:13.920
<v Speaker 1>so with him in this of like this guy is

0:31:14.040 --> 0:31:16.440
<v Speaker 1>driving me creat When he lets him carry a barrel

0:31:16.480 --> 0:31:18.680
<v Speaker 1>all the way up the spirals in your.

0:31:18.600 --> 0:31:20.920
<v Speaker 2>Case and take it back down, He's.

0:31:20.800 --> 0:31:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Like, catch your breath, Catch your breath, boy, Okay, I

0:31:23.320 --> 0:31:25.840
<v Speaker 1>take that back downstairs. I would kill him right there.

0:31:26.280 --> 0:31:28.680
<v Speaker 1>There'd be no in your sleep for me. I'd be like, well,

0:31:28.760 --> 0:31:31.120
<v Speaker 1>you have to die, because that's like let's but to

0:31:31.160 --> 0:31:33.760
<v Speaker 1>be fair, his next response is, if you don't want

0:31:33.800 --> 0:31:36.480
<v Speaker 1>to set this whole lighthouse on fire, take that back

0:31:36.520 --> 0:31:38.400
<v Speaker 1>down if it's not safe. But why did you let

0:31:38.480 --> 0:31:40.360
<v Speaker 1>me get my ass all the way up here, old man,

0:31:40.520 --> 0:31:45.800
<v Speaker 1>just to teach me a lesson. It's like it's infuriating.

0:31:45.800 --> 0:31:47.480
<v Speaker 2>And it does make you think it that is like

0:31:47.800 --> 0:31:50.200
<v Speaker 2>his goal is to like either teach a lesson, drive

0:31:50.280 --> 0:31:54.760
<v Speaker 2>him insane, or or or just have fun with tormenting

0:31:54.800 --> 0:31:57.280
<v Speaker 2>this poor guy. I wanted to say too, just to

0:31:57.320 --> 0:32:02.040
<v Speaker 2>your point about like if Robert Eggar, if Robert Eggers

0:32:02.040 --> 0:32:05.080
<v Speaker 2>gave Willem Dafoe the space to make that decision. I

0:32:05.080 --> 0:32:07.680
<v Speaker 2>really think he did, because I get the impression just

0:32:07.680 --> 0:32:10.520
<v Speaker 2>from an interview I watched about the lighthouse that I

0:32:10.560 --> 0:32:15.520
<v Speaker 2>think Robert Eggers takes the opinion of his actors to heart.

0:32:16.120 --> 0:32:20.600
<v Speaker 2>Like there is a moment in the interview where he

0:32:20.640 --> 0:32:25.200
<v Speaker 2>talks about the first lighthouse that they scouted for the

0:32:25.320 --> 0:32:28.480
<v Speaker 2>movie was the one that they had decided on, and

0:32:28.560 --> 0:32:32.040
<v Speaker 2>they took the actors the crew there and the actress

0:32:32.040 --> 0:32:36.240
<v Speaker 2>who plays the mermaid, her name is Valeria Karaman, She's Russian,

0:32:36.560 --> 0:32:41.000
<v Speaker 2>and she immediately said, what is this ugly Soviet bullshit?

0:32:41.720 --> 0:32:44.320
<v Speaker 2>You know, like, what is this horrible mids It was

0:32:44.360 --> 0:32:47.920
<v Speaker 2>a mid century designed lighthouse, and that's when Robert Eggers

0:32:47.960 --> 0:32:49.600
<v Speaker 2>was like, yeah, you know what, we can't use this

0:32:49.800 --> 0:32:52.560
<v Speaker 2>because it's it's not right, and she didn't like it,

0:32:52.640 --> 0:32:55.000
<v Speaker 2>So we're going to build our own lighthouse on this cape.

0:32:55.000 --> 0:32:57.680
<v Speaker 2>So I think he does value and that's what I

0:32:57.720 --> 0:33:01.400
<v Speaker 2>think is respectable in a directors, when they actually value

0:33:01.400 --> 0:33:03.640
<v Speaker 2>the opinions of their talent and stuff.

0:33:04.400 --> 0:33:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think there's a balance of trust that needs

0:33:07.640 --> 0:33:12.800
<v Speaker 1>to be established, and not always, but sometimes it bodes

0:33:12.880 --> 0:33:16.800
<v Speaker 1>well when actors frequently return with directors because you understand

0:33:16.800 --> 0:33:21.200
<v Speaker 1>there's a sense of trust and relationship building there that

0:33:21.360 --> 0:33:23.400
<v Speaker 1>brings them back and it makes you feel good. And

0:33:23.440 --> 0:33:25.400
<v Speaker 1>by that I mean I work in this industry and

0:33:25.440 --> 0:33:27.520
<v Speaker 1>I know how toxic and awful it can be. And

0:33:27.560 --> 0:33:30.440
<v Speaker 1>so when there's ever a glimmer of hope that maybe

0:33:30.840 --> 0:33:34.000
<v Speaker 1>this is a director that people, particularly women, seem to

0:33:34.000 --> 0:33:37.200
<v Speaker 1>feel good and safe around and creatively free, like, that's

0:33:37.240 --> 0:33:43.760
<v Speaker 1>always exciting. Yeah, let's talk a little bit about the Light,

0:33:44.040 --> 0:33:46.640
<v Speaker 1>which is something we've sort of speculated on at the

0:33:46.640 --> 0:33:51.680
<v Speaker 1>beginning of this episode. At first, I was like, oh,

0:33:51.800 --> 0:33:53.920
<v Speaker 1>this is a metaphor for when I'm being in my

0:33:54.000 --> 0:33:56.440
<v Speaker 1>most base instinct. Okay, this is a metaphor for a woman.

0:33:56.520 --> 0:33:58.920
<v Speaker 1>It's this thing that they long for that they can't see.

0:33:59.440 --> 0:34:02.960
<v Speaker 1>But then it's like, no, this is our responsibility and

0:34:03.000 --> 0:34:05.720
<v Speaker 1>without women. Okay again, if you're going along the American

0:34:05.760 --> 0:34:08.000
<v Speaker 1>idealized idea of like what a man is this whole

0:34:08.000 --> 0:34:13.600
<v Speaker 1>like Cowboy, rugged, independent, A key factor, a high key factor.

0:34:13.600 --> 0:34:16.000
<v Speaker 1>If you've been watching Cross on Amazon, they talk about

0:34:16.000 --> 0:34:19.239
<v Speaker 1>this a lot, or like, really exploit this idea. If

0:34:19.239 --> 0:34:21.480
<v Speaker 1>you're a man, you're supposed to be a savior or

0:34:21.480 --> 0:34:23.880
<v Speaker 1>a hero or a protector or at the very least

0:34:23.920 --> 0:34:28.480
<v Speaker 1>a provider. At the very least, your responsibility is to

0:34:28.760 --> 0:34:34.200
<v Speaker 1>financially and with like care and taking of the land.

0:34:35.280 --> 0:34:37.960
<v Speaker 1>That is your responsibility. That is the thing that defines

0:34:38.000 --> 0:34:40.080
<v Speaker 1>you as a man. And if there are no women

0:34:40.719 --> 0:34:45.200
<v Speaker 1>to protect, but you have this lighthouse, this responsibility of

0:34:45.239 --> 0:34:49.640
<v Speaker 1>like protecting your fellow man. But it's so offhands right,

0:34:49.640 --> 0:34:51.600
<v Speaker 1>Like you're not actively in it with your fellow man.

0:34:51.640 --> 0:34:55.400
<v Speaker 1>You're literally separated from and from a distance supposed to

0:34:55.440 --> 0:34:57.719
<v Speaker 1>be trying to help them. It's like, so, okay, so

0:34:57.920 --> 0:35:02.040
<v Speaker 1>is the light this idea of their But then they

0:35:02.080 --> 0:35:05.719
<v Speaker 1>literally become like consumed and obsessed over this thing, and

0:35:05.960 --> 0:35:09.600
<v Speaker 1>you think, okay, well maybe that's about like greed.

0:35:10.160 --> 0:35:10.360
<v Speaker 3>You know.

0:35:10.520 --> 0:35:11.719
<v Speaker 1>He's like, I want to take care of les, like

0:35:11.719 --> 0:35:15.000
<v Speaker 1>it's my responsibility. You're not their young buck, I can

0:35:15.200 --> 0:35:17.520
<v Speaker 1>slow your role. He's like, no, okay. Maybe it's a

0:35:17.520 --> 0:35:21.080
<v Speaker 1>metaphor for like when do you lose your manhood? Like

0:35:21.080 --> 0:35:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Willumdafoe's aging, he's older, is he going to age out

0:35:24.480 --> 0:35:26.720
<v Speaker 1>of this job? And what will he do once it happens.

0:35:27.000 --> 0:35:29.080
<v Speaker 1>Robert's trying to make his way, He's trying to get

0:35:29.440 --> 0:35:31.360
<v Speaker 1>enough money to support himself and build this house and

0:35:31.360 --> 0:35:34.000
<v Speaker 1>starts to fan like they're at they're both trying to

0:35:34.120 --> 0:35:38.200
<v Speaker 1>use this pinnacle and they understand inherently one thing that

0:35:38.200 --> 0:35:41.080
<v Speaker 1>they can't do it together, and is that the light.

0:35:41.560 --> 0:35:43.640
<v Speaker 1>I have a lot of maybe the light changes, what

0:35:43.680 --> 0:35:45.399
<v Speaker 1>does it mean for you? How does it come off

0:35:45.440 --> 0:35:47.080
<v Speaker 1>for you?

0:35:45.560 --> 0:35:49.080
<v Speaker 2>You know, I hadn't thought about it like that, but

0:35:49.120 --> 0:35:53.960
<v Speaker 2>I like the idea that the lighthouse is this symbol

0:35:54.000 --> 0:35:56.880
<v Speaker 2>of a woman. And you could even if we're if

0:35:56.880 --> 0:36:00.279
<v Speaker 2>we're going with that analogy, you could even say the

0:36:00.280 --> 0:36:02.279
<v Speaker 2>conflict they have of like, well, when am I going

0:36:02.360 --> 0:36:04.560
<v Speaker 2>to take care of the lighthouse? Is sort of like

0:36:05.719 --> 0:36:09.960
<v Speaker 2>is like when two men are are fighting over a woman,

0:36:10.480 --> 0:36:13.680
<v Speaker 2>you know, and and who gets to be the one

0:36:13.719 --> 0:36:19.080
<v Speaker 2>that cares for and looks after this woman? And you

0:36:19.120 --> 0:36:22.920
<v Speaker 2>can really tell with Robert Pattens through Robert Pattenson's character,

0:36:23.520 --> 0:36:26.000
<v Speaker 2>that is something that he's really consumed with with his

0:36:26.040 --> 0:36:31.080
<v Speaker 2>little soap carving of a mermaid, his dream dreams or

0:36:31.400 --> 0:36:35.720
<v Speaker 2>actual encounters with the mermaid. Who knows what's actually happening there,

0:36:36.680 --> 0:36:38.960
<v Speaker 2>but he is really consumed with this idea of a

0:36:39.040 --> 0:36:42.839
<v Speaker 2>woman when there are no women around, So I think

0:36:42.880 --> 0:36:45.520
<v Speaker 2>it could. I think the analogy of the lighthouse being

0:36:45.560 --> 0:36:48.320
<v Speaker 2>a woman does work for me, But I think it

0:36:48.360 --> 0:36:51.120
<v Speaker 2>could also be fluid in the sense that it at

0:36:51.120 --> 0:36:54.320
<v Speaker 2>different times means different things. But the fact that Willem

0:36:54.360 --> 0:36:57.719
<v Speaker 2>Dafoe like gets naked and like goes up there and

0:36:58.640 --> 0:37:01.880
<v Speaker 2>you know, bathes in the light feels very much like

0:37:01.960 --> 0:37:03.880
<v Speaker 2>you know, a guy like going to a strip club

0:37:04.000 --> 0:37:08.080
<v Speaker 2>and like, you know, enjoying the entertainment of women and

0:37:08.080 --> 0:37:11.640
<v Speaker 2>stuff like that. So I think it's an interesting analogy

0:37:11.680 --> 0:37:12.479
<v Speaker 2>to look at it that way.

0:37:13.560 --> 0:37:18.279
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I love the Again, the nebulousness of it has

0:37:18.560 --> 0:37:22.680
<v Speaker 1>got the uh two thousand and one Space Odyssey vibes

0:37:23.080 --> 0:37:27.400
<v Speaker 1>of like, who is how supposed to like represent or be?

0:37:28.280 --> 0:37:33.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, is how your own enterdemon is. The outreach

0:37:33.719 --> 0:37:37.319
<v Speaker 1>of man trying to explore beyond this whole earth that

0:37:37.320 --> 0:37:41.560
<v Speaker 1>we've been given is a you know more about I

0:37:41.560 --> 0:37:43.759
<v Speaker 1>don't want to break down this movie. I'm sorry, we're

0:37:43.800 --> 0:37:47.440
<v Speaker 1>on the Lighthouse, but that's the idea of just just

0:37:47.480 --> 0:37:51.719
<v Speaker 1>to compare it as a cosmic horror, This idea of

0:37:51.760 --> 0:37:56.799
<v Speaker 1>the unknown and the desire that you can't reach is

0:37:56.880 --> 0:37:59.600
<v Speaker 1>so fascinating, and we talked a lot in The Witch

0:37:59.640 --> 0:38:03.920
<v Speaker 1>about vibes in tone, and this film starts off in

0:38:04.080 --> 0:38:08.840
<v Speaker 1>a fog of cloudy haze, like it's really trying to

0:38:08.920 --> 0:38:12.080
<v Speaker 1>sell you on the idea of not being able to

0:38:12.120 --> 0:38:15.719
<v Speaker 1>see what's directly in front of you. And I think

0:38:15.760 --> 0:38:17.920
<v Speaker 1>that's really interesting because what these two guys are never

0:38:18.000 --> 0:38:22.080
<v Speaker 1>able to do is find a real partnership, right Like

0:38:22.120 --> 0:38:24.440
<v Speaker 1>you're really what's supposed to be happening here is your

0:38:24.480 --> 0:38:27.400
<v Speaker 1>two dudes who are running a lighthouse. This shouldn't be

0:38:27.440 --> 0:38:30.600
<v Speaker 1>that complicate. There's enough food, there's enough drink, there's enough

0:38:30.680 --> 0:38:34.920
<v Speaker 1>jobs for everyone to be doing. But immediately Defoe is like,

0:38:35.000 --> 0:38:38.840
<v Speaker 1>I need to be on top, And immediately Robert's character

0:38:39.000 --> 0:38:43.440
<v Speaker 1>is coming from a place of I need to establish

0:38:43.480 --> 0:38:46.800
<v Speaker 1>myself here in order to go back and make more money,

0:38:46.840 --> 0:38:50.239
<v Speaker 1>like he's he's formally like a logger. They're both coming

0:38:50.239 --> 0:38:54.439
<v Speaker 1>off with some pretty traumatic experiences and neither can give

0:38:54.480 --> 0:38:58.800
<v Speaker 1>each other the space to sort of be their own person.

0:38:59.160 --> 0:39:03.960
<v Speaker 1>There is this need to be the most dominant figure

0:39:04.200 --> 0:39:05.239
<v Speaker 1>in the space.

0:39:05.400 --> 0:39:08.560
<v Speaker 2>And Robert Pattinson's character is also lying about who he

0:39:08.640 --> 0:39:14.840
<v Speaker 2>really is true, and he takes over the place of

0:39:14.880 --> 0:39:18.600
<v Speaker 2>the real Frahim Winslow and pretends to be Frahim Winslow,

0:39:18.640 --> 0:39:21.840
<v Speaker 2>which I think is what also kind of maybe is

0:39:21.920 --> 0:39:26.440
<v Speaker 2>part of because he is trying to conceal something about himself,

0:39:27.080 --> 0:39:33.160
<v Speaker 2>he's unable to actually connect and be genuine and authentic

0:39:33.239 --> 0:39:37.359
<v Speaker 2>with Willem Dafoe's character. Oh man, does that make sense?

0:39:37.960 --> 0:39:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, No, that's definitely. That's definitely was my takeaway as well.

0:39:43.200 --> 0:39:45.480
<v Speaker 1>When we come back, we're gonna talk about the Dollhouse

0:39:46.080 --> 0:39:48.640
<v Speaker 1>and what that means to Eggers and how it impacts

0:39:48.640 --> 0:40:03.440
<v Speaker 1>this film. So stay tuned. Okay, we're back. Last week

0:40:03.440 --> 0:40:09.600
<v Speaker 1>we talked about the Dollhouse. Edgers when he was designing films, right,

0:40:09.719 --> 0:40:12.560
<v Speaker 1>he has a background in production design, that's sort of

0:40:12.600 --> 0:40:15.080
<v Speaker 1>what he was studying in college. He goes on to

0:40:15.120 --> 0:40:19.040
<v Speaker 1>become a filmmaker and when he's staging his films in

0:40:19.040 --> 0:40:21.600
<v Speaker 1>his head and he's writing the scripts. Eggers gave a

0:40:21.640 --> 0:40:25.200
<v Speaker 1>long talk where he was explaining that his films are

0:40:25.239 --> 0:40:28.280
<v Speaker 1>overwritten because he writes them for himself and he wants

0:40:29.120 --> 0:40:33.680
<v Speaker 1>investors and producers and everyone involved to understand what the

0:40:33.719 --> 0:40:38.880
<v Speaker 1>tonality is because they're so reliant on nailing that. So

0:40:39.680 --> 0:40:43.160
<v Speaker 1>part of that is building literally a dollhouse where he's

0:40:43.719 --> 0:40:46.960
<v Speaker 1>sketching out like what happens in each moment, and then

0:40:47.440 --> 0:40:49.520
<v Speaker 1>he was saying that it's really his goal to walk

0:40:49.560 --> 0:40:52.520
<v Speaker 1>people through that dollhouse in his film. The opening of

0:40:52.560 --> 0:40:55.160
<v Speaker 1>his film come off off the foggy water, and then

0:40:55.239 --> 0:40:59.200
<v Speaker 1>it's a slow walk through the lighthouse and exploration of

0:40:59.239 --> 0:41:03.520
<v Speaker 1>this whole space. It is both. I think it's like

0:41:03.880 --> 0:41:07.360
<v Speaker 1>two and a half to three minutes something in there

0:41:07.520 --> 0:41:12.760
<v Speaker 1>of just scenery and looking around. It builds a creep factor,

0:41:12.840 --> 0:41:16.400
<v Speaker 1>to be sure. But what I think it does more

0:41:16.480 --> 0:41:20.279
<v Speaker 1>than that is imbue you to this space as like

0:41:21.280 --> 0:41:25.200
<v Speaker 1>a setting. That's a really poor way of saying it,

0:41:25.400 --> 0:41:30.440
<v Speaker 1>but I just rewatched Young Frankenstein and the Lutro credits.

0:41:30.680 --> 0:41:34.719
<v Speaker 1>It's a great fucking movie. And the introduction of that

0:41:34.800 --> 0:41:39.440
<v Speaker 1>film is classic, right. It's the old world. It's inspired

0:41:39.480 --> 0:41:41.600
<v Speaker 1>by the films of the thirties. In fact, the entire

0:41:41.680 --> 0:41:44.839
<v Speaker 1>set comes from a production designer in the thirties who

0:41:44.840 --> 0:41:46.480
<v Speaker 1>they went to his house and they were like, hey,

0:41:46.480 --> 0:41:47.759
<v Speaker 1>can you tell us how to make this stuff? He's like,

0:41:47.800 --> 0:41:49.399
<v Speaker 1>I actually have all of it in my garage. If

0:41:49.400 --> 0:41:51.319
<v Speaker 1>you want it, you can just piece together and make

0:41:51.320 --> 0:41:53.200
<v Speaker 1>your own set out of all these old set pieces

0:41:53.239 --> 0:41:57.000
<v Speaker 1>I have. I think it was the original Frankenstein film

0:41:57.000 --> 0:41:58.600
<v Speaker 1>that this guy did, and they just took all that

0:41:58.640 --> 0:42:01.239
<v Speaker 1>stuff and read right, reset it up here, which is

0:42:01.360 --> 0:42:04.400
<v Speaker 1>very cool. But the opening of that film is just

0:42:04.440 --> 0:42:07.719
<v Speaker 1>the castle. It's the castle. It's cracks of lightning and

0:42:07.880 --> 0:42:11.120
<v Speaker 1>credits and what it's like. Okay, so you're in this

0:42:11.160 --> 0:42:13.480
<v Speaker 1>old world caped place. You see there's some lights. It

0:42:13.480 --> 0:42:16.280
<v Speaker 1>gets your brain thinking. And we talked a lot about

0:42:16.280 --> 0:42:20.840
<v Speaker 1>this last week as well, the three aspects of Edgar's films.

0:42:21.320 --> 0:42:25.080
<v Speaker 1>I really think that just pacing the floorboards allows you

0:42:25.120 --> 0:42:27.600
<v Speaker 1>to think, how would I survive in this situation? And

0:42:27.600 --> 0:42:30.480
<v Speaker 1>again not a life or desk situation, but I'm isolated.

0:42:30.560 --> 0:42:33.279
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of beautiful. It's a little creepy though, it's

0:42:33.320 --> 0:42:37.600
<v Speaker 1>all like washed out. It's but it seems scenicd but

0:42:37.600 --> 0:42:39.799
<v Speaker 1>it's also what if I get hurt? Who would come?

0:42:39.840 --> 0:42:43.960
<v Speaker 1>How would you get here? It's so isolated and allowing

0:42:44.000 --> 0:42:45.919
<v Speaker 1>you to sort of sink in and settle into that

0:42:46.160 --> 0:42:50.879
<v Speaker 1>space before you meet your main characters. I mean, it's

0:42:50.920 --> 0:42:55.360
<v Speaker 1>putting your setting first. It's saying the story couldn't happen anywhere,

0:42:55.800 --> 0:42:59.160
<v Speaker 1>but here. I think it elevates and makes special everything

0:42:59.200 --> 0:43:01.680
<v Speaker 1>you're about to see because it's like in a mooge

0:43:01.680 --> 0:43:04.920
<v Speaker 1>booth bosh. I don't speak the language. I'm sure I'm

0:43:04.920 --> 0:43:09.920
<v Speaker 1>not French. Likely a palate cleanser.

0:43:10.960 --> 0:43:14.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, no, it really is. And then that first

0:43:14.680 --> 0:43:18.279
<v Speaker 2>shot that we get of Robert Pattenson and Willem Dafoe

0:43:18.400 --> 0:43:20.719
<v Speaker 2>standing next to each other with all their stuff, it's

0:43:20.760 --> 0:43:24.760
<v Speaker 2>just like they just look they just look so grim

0:43:25.000 --> 0:43:28.000
<v Speaker 2>and like like, why the fuck are we here? You know,

0:43:28.280 --> 0:43:30.799
<v Speaker 2>they just don't look happy. They don't look happy. So

0:43:30.880 --> 0:43:32.240
<v Speaker 2>it really also sets the tone.

0:43:32.920 --> 0:43:37.000
<v Speaker 1>It does. It's yeah, it's it's a hell of a movie.

0:43:37.160 --> 0:43:42.840
<v Speaker 1>I guess we should talk about the ending now. Yes, okay,

0:43:43.480 --> 0:43:50.040
<v Speaker 1>so we spent this whole movie watching these two men

0:43:50.080 --> 0:43:53.360
<v Speaker 1>try to one up each other. There is a power

0:43:53.440 --> 0:43:57.680
<v Speaker 1>struggle and it yeah, really I kept going backwards and

0:43:57.719 --> 0:44:02.719
<v Speaker 1>forwards in the last maybe half hour to track the

0:44:03.040 --> 0:44:06.759
<v Speaker 1>exchange of power, and there's I mean literally, if you

0:44:06.800 --> 0:44:09.040
<v Speaker 1>were to just rewind and fast forward through this part

0:44:09.080 --> 0:44:12.319
<v Speaker 1>like I did, it's every two minutes, every three to

0:44:12.360 --> 0:44:16.640
<v Speaker 1>five minutes, and what is changing is not always clear.

0:44:17.040 --> 0:44:18.560
<v Speaker 1>And we talked a little bit about it earlier. My

0:44:18.560 --> 0:44:21.320
<v Speaker 1>big takeaway from watching this film initially was like, Oh,

0:44:21.600 --> 0:44:25.400
<v Speaker 1>it's strange. How if there's only two people in a room,

0:44:25.719 --> 0:44:28.560
<v Speaker 1>you will become what you need to each other. Maybe

0:44:28.600 --> 0:44:31.640
<v Speaker 1>not in a healthy way, but at some point they're

0:44:31.680 --> 0:44:35.680
<v Speaker 1>parenting each other. At some point, they're brothers, at some point,

0:44:35.719 --> 0:44:38.319
<v Speaker 1>they're coworkers, at some point their families, at some point

0:44:38.360 --> 0:44:43.920
<v Speaker 1>their potential lovers. Like they're going through every possible relationship

0:44:44.040 --> 0:44:47.320
<v Speaker 1>you could have with a person through this time frame.

0:44:47.400 --> 0:44:50.160
<v Speaker 1>And if that's the case, then what your characters are

0:44:50.200 --> 0:44:52.760
<v Speaker 1>left with is really they're fighting themselves and their entertainments,

0:44:52.800 --> 0:44:55.640
<v Speaker 1>which again is the core in space of where masculinity,

0:44:56.040 --> 0:45:00.719
<v Speaker 1>any kind of insecurity lives. And it builds to a

0:45:00.760 --> 0:45:07.399
<v Speaker 1>point where Defoe's character is reduced to a dog and

0:45:07.840 --> 0:45:15.560
<v Speaker 1>Pattenson's character is his owner. It is somewhat bondage puppy

0:45:15.600 --> 0:45:21.600
<v Speaker 1>play maybe, but also just a complete psychotic break and

0:45:21.760 --> 0:45:27.239
<v Speaker 1>instead of you know, you might you would expect an

0:45:27.360 --> 0:45:32.239
<v Speaker 1>unwell person to maybe like beat the dog or to

0:45:32.440 --> 0:45:37.640
<v Speaker 1>shun and like abandon the dog. Maybe again an unwell

0:45:37.640 --> 0:45:39.480
<v Speaker 1>person take the dog out and like shoot it. But

0:45:39.560 --> 0:45:45.480
<v Speaker 1>what he does is he buries it alive. Yeah, what

0:45:45.480 --> 0:45:49.960
<v Speaker 1>what what does this this meaning ending mean to you?

0:45:50.280 --> 0:45:55.000
<v Speaker 1>And also if if this is a film about toxic masculine,

0:45:55.000 --> 0:45:58.680
<v Speaker 1>what do you think Edgar's takeaway is with this this

0:45:58.800 --> 0:46:00.800
<v Speaker 1>part of the conclusion it's a conclusion.

0:46:02.120 --> 0:46:04.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you know, I don't even know if I have

0:46:05.120 --> 0:46:09.520
<v Speaker 2>like a fully formed idea yet of what it means

0:46:09.520 --> 0:46:11.240
<v Speaker 2>to me. But I will say the first time I

0:46:11.280 --> 0:46:14.880
<v Speaker 2>watched it, I was like, what the hell is happening?

0:46:15.640 --> 0:46:18.439
<v Speaker 2>What in the hell? Where did how did we get

0:46:18.560 --> 0:46:23.080
<v Speaker 2>to this? But then you do go there is an

0:46:23.239 --> 0:46:26.720
<v Speaker 2>escalation that gets us to that point, and I think,

0:46:27.880 --> 0:46:32.400
<v Speaker 2>you know, I think maybe burying him alive might be

0:46:32.640 --> 0:46:38.440
<v Speaker 2>a symbolism of like him Robert Pattinson's character, burying his shame,

0:46:38.840 --> 0:46:43.600
<v Speaker 2>burying his you know, inadequacyes, those kinds of things. But

0:46:44.640 --> 0:46:46.560
<v Speaker 2>I don't even know if I have like a fully

0:46:46.600 --> 0:46:50.880
<v Speaker 2>formed idea of what exactly it means yet. You know,

0:46:50.920 --> 0:46:52.319
<v Speaker 2>I think I'm gonna have to watch it a few

0:46:52.320 --> 0:46:55.520
<v Speaker 2>more times to really kind of understand it, especially after

0:46:55.560 --> 0:46:58.160
<v Speaker 2>this conversation, because you've really kind of given me a

0:46:58.200 --> 0:47:03.319
<v Speaker 2>new light on on the movie. But yeah, I think,

0:47:04.040 --> 0:47:06.960
<v Speaker 2>if anything, he feels ashamed about a lot of things,

0:47:08.280 --> 0:47:13.640
<v Speaker 2>replacing the actual Frahim winslow lying doing all of this

0:47:13.760 --> 0:47:16.800
<v Speaker 2>like power dynamic stuff, and then it evolves into a

0:47:16.880 --> 0:47:21.160
<v Speaker 2>very homo erotic direction where he is really more attracted

0:47:21.160 --> 0:47:24.279
<v Speaker 2>to women, or supposed to be attracted to women. There

0:47:24.320 --> 0:47:27.520
<v Speaker 2>could be like a bevarying of shame going on there.

0:47:27.560 --> 0:47:28.839
<v Speaker 2>I think, you know, I.

0:47:28.760 --> 0:47:31.680
<v Speaker 1>Really like that read. I want to bring up. I'm

0:47:31.719 --> 0:47:37.200
<v Speaker 1>trying to see if HBO will let me share this

0:47:37.480 --> 0:47:40.680
<v Speaker 1>audio because I think the final speech.

0:47:41.200 --> 0:47:43.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Edgars is.

0:47:43.120 --> 0:47:48.240
<v Speaker 1>A prolific Shakespeare scholar, studied in school at the collegiate level,

0:47:48.440 --> 0:47:50.960
<v Speaker 1>like really really loves Shakespeare. Talked a lot about his

0:47:51.040 --> 0:47:53.400
<v Speaker 1>love of Shakespeare when he was doing The Witch. And

0:47:53.480 --> 0:47:58.239
<v Speaker 1>I think because this movie is predominantly monologues between men

0:47:58.360 --> 0:48:02.160
<v Speaker 1>swinging erratically between emotions, no states of being can really

0:48:02.160 --> 0:48:05.680
<v Speaker 1>get to embrace that idea. And because you're also dealing

0:48:05.719 --> 0:48:10.080
<v Speaker 1>with death and sort of this operatic level of power,

0:48:10.280 --> 0:48:12.279
<v Speaker 1>it works well. And so I just want to play

0:48:12.280 --> 0:48:15.600
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of the speech that Defoe is as

0:48:15.640 --> 0:48:17.319
<v Speaker 1>he's being buried alive.

0:48:21.080 --> 0:48:30.960
<v Speaker 3>Shut up all all ship breastwork, oh right, aproaching arm

0:48:31.160 --> 0:48:34.920
<v Speaker 3>sway him up from men's minds and men and heart

0:48:35.000 --> 0:48:40.760
<v Speaker 3>Promathian plunder stoking eyes with divine shames and horror.

0:48:43.400 --> 0:48:44.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm casting them.

0:48:44.400 --> 0:48:48.840
<v Speaker 1>Down to David jonas he others.

0:48:50.680 --> 0:48:58.840
<v Speaker 4>Stay mind yet in it see oh, the divine passion,

0:49:02.560 --> 0:49:11.200
<v Speaker 4>the fedders green scent, where no man suffered, what toil is.

0:49:13.440 --> 0:49:16.920
<v Speaker 1>Actually flab.

0:49:21.280 --> 0:49:22.120
<v Speaker 3>Dot changing.

0:49:24.320 --> 0:49:29.720
<v Speaker 4>Yes, the sha who gurdles round the globe.

0:49:32.239 --> 0:49:37.520
<v Speaker 3>That's true, go Mesh.

0:49:38.440 --> 0:49:42.160
<v Speaker 2>Very Shakespearean in the sense that I had to google

0:49:42.200 --> 0:49:46.319
<v Speaker 2>a lot of those phrases to actually understand what the

0:49:46.360 --> 0:49:47.680
<v Speaker 2>hell any of it meant.

0:49:47.880 --> 0:49:51.200
<v Speaker 1>I know Davy Jones, but yeah, I was like, okay,

0:49:51.280 --> 0:49:54.200
<v Speaker 1>so sent to Davy Jones is thrown undersea. To me,

0:49:54.560 --> 0:49:57.000
<v Speaker 1>the I was just looking. I actually was in the

0:49:57.000 --> 0:49:59.520
<v Speaker 1>process of looking at Philler's Greeds Afterlife, where there is

0:49:59.600 --> 0:50:03.320
<v Speaker 1>prepa mirth okay, a filler never stops playing, and dancers

0:50:03.360 --> 0:50:06.600
<v Speaker 1>you never tire, okay. So talking about being sent to

0:50:06.640 --> 0:50:10.160
<v Speaker 1>the afterlife. But to me rewatching that scene and re

0:50:10.239 --> 0:50:14.560
<v Speaker 1>listening to the speech now and having had this conversation

0:50:14.640 --> 0:50:18.360
<v Speaker 1>with you, I do wonder if this is about And

0:50:18.440 --> 0:50:21.319
<v Speaker 1>again I don't think Eggars is so literal. I think

0:50:21.520 --> 0:50:26.000
<v Speaker 1>his films are open enough to leave it to your interpretation,

0:50:26.160 --> 0:50:28.520
<v Speaker 1>which is to me one of the best forms of art.

0:50:28.560 --> 0:50:32.320
<v Speaker 1>I really like art that is specific enough that it

0:50:32.360 --> 0:50:35.200
<v Speaker 1>becomes universal. This is a really hard element to achieve.

0:50:35.360 --> 0:50:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Oh God. Mir Kari, who's a Japanese fashion designer, talks

0:50:40.600 --> 0:50:45.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot about this in their approach, which is essentially

0:50:45.200 --> 0:50:50.279
<v Speaker 1>like the simpler, smaller, more unique you can be, the

0:50:50.400 --> 0:50:54.440
<v Speaker 1>more universally people will understand, reflect and be able to

0:50:54.480 --> 0:50:56.759
<v Speaker 1>attach to your artwork. That's a very broad way of

0:50:56.800 --> 0:50:59.920
<v Speaker 1>explaining that, but I think Eggers were a lot of it.

0:51:00.040 --> 0:51:02.240
<v Speaker 1>It's inside of that bubble. And because he's a director

0:51:02.239 --> 0:51:05.120
<v Speaker 1>who doesn't talk too much about his work, he doesn't

0:51:05.200 --> 0:51:08.080
<v Speaker 1>wind up cornering it into a very solid idea. And

0:51:08.160 --> 0:51:11.040
<v Speaker 1>so what I get out of this scene is okay,

0:51:11.200 --> 0:51:14.560
<v Speaker 1>if really like at this is patentson having quote one right.

0:51:14.880 --> 0:51:17.920
<v Speaker 1>The masculinity race is one by the younger, more up

0:51:17.920 --> 0:51:20.680
<v Speaker 1>and coming guy, and this is the old guy being

0:51:21.719 --> 0:51:25.800
<v Speaker 1>accepting his end, accepting that he's no longer sort of

0:51:25.840 --> 0:51:31.000
<v Speaker 1>a masculine dominant, accepting that it is his time to go. Yeah,

0:51:31.080 --> 0:51:34.839
<v Speaker 1>but in a strangely in a merry way. And so

0:51:34.880 --> 0:51:36.719
<v Speaker 1>I don't have to toil anymore. I don't have to

0:51:36.760 --> 0:51:39.960
<v Speaker 1>work hard. I don't have to any longer adhere to

0:51:40.000 --> 0:51:42.319
<v Speaker 1>these ideas of masculinity because I'm going to a place

0:51:42.320 --> 0:51:45.400
<v Speaker 1>where that no longer matters and I can experience genuine

0:51:45.560 --> 0:51:49.799
<v Speaker 1>joy I think I experience with him. Yeah, And I

0:51:49.800 --> 0:51:53.880
<v Speaker 1>think that's a really interesting way, because you see in

0:51:53.960 --> 0:51:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Patentson's performance that his character isn't getting any kind of

0:51:58.920 --> 0:52:02.359
<v Speaker 1>joy out of this, even in the light at the end,

0:52:02.360 --> 0:52:04.040
<v Speaker 1>which where we come to the second ending. Right, So

0:52:04.080 --> 0:52:07.360
<v Speaker 1>the first ending is Defoe's character is literally buried alive,

0:52:08.360 --> 0:52:11.160
<v Speaker 1>perhaps accepting that and being excited to leave this plane

0:52:11.160 --> 0:52:13.279
<v Speaker 1>and don't have to deal with this bullshit anymore. Who

0:52:13.320 --> 0:52:18.680
<v Speaker 1>couldn't identify Robert's Like, finally me and this light get

0:52:18.719 --> 0:52:21.399
<v Speaker 1>to be together, and also I'm gonna burn this whole

0:52:21.400 --> 0:52:25.879
<v Speaker 1>place down because I'm crazy, Okay, cool. So he gets

0:52:25.960 --> 0:52:28.319
<v Speaker 1>up to the light and it sort of radiates and

0:52:28.360 --> 0:52:32.040
<v Speaker 1>takes over everything, and this is sort of the final imagery.

0:52:32.680 --> 0:52:35.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the first the only color we see in the film,

0:52:35.880 --> 0:52:37.759
<v Speaker 2>which I think is really fascinating too.

0:52:39.239 --> 0:52:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Whenever the purple I think of purple hearts, right, like

0:52:42.120 --> 0:52:46.160
<v Speaker 1>the idea of the wounded warrior, the fact that maybe

0:52:46.440 --> 0:52:51.719
<v Speaker 1>no man gets out unscathed by the ideals of masculinity. Again,

0:52:51.760 --> 0:52:54.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't think this is a film that's meant to

0:52:54.600 --> 0:52:56.239
<v Speaker 1>say this is what it is to be a man.

0:52:56.280 --> 0:53:00.440
<v Speaker 1>But it's a film interrogating the ideals of masculine and

0:53:00.480 --> 0:53:04.520
<v Speaker 1>the way that they shape and harm the men who

0:53:04.560 --> 0:53:07.279
<v Speaker 1>have to live under them, which is a profound and

0:53:07.760 --> 0:53:10.520
<v Speaker 1>beautiful and weird and absolutely disgusting thing. You had. It

0:53:10.680 --> 0:53:15.600
<v Speaker 1>was so so FROs but it worked on a lot

0:53:15.680 --> 0:53:18.360
<v Speaker 1>of levels. This is a film that I don't know

0:53:18.440 --> 0:53:21.279
<v Speaker 1>if I'll be visiting again soon, but that I have

0:53:21.360 --> 0:53:25.839
<v Speaker 1>a deep appreciation for. Like I appreciate that everyone here

0:53:25.960 --> 0:53:29.279
<v Speaker 1>was willing to be like weird and uncomfortable. I appreciate

0:53:29.320 --> 0:53:33.200
<v Speaker 1>that this is a film that wanted to interrogate masculinity

0:53:33.239 --> 0:53:37.680
<v Speaker 1>in a way that like Fight Club is similarly trying

0:53:37.719 --> 0:53:42.759
<v Speaker 1>to explore this ideal masculinity, but unfortunately became cool and

0:53:42.800 --> 0:53:44.640
<v Speaker 1>guys were like, yes, this is what I would have liked.

0:53:44.800 --> 0:53:47.120
<v Speaker 1>It completely missed, like many people will miss the point.

0:53:47.920 --> 0:53:50.800
<v Speaker 2>I don't think the light House will do that. I think, yeah,

0:53:51.239 --> 0:53:52.120
<v Speaker 2>stay free of that.

0:53:52.360 --> 0:53:55.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah you may miss the point, but you won't be

0:53:55.520 --> 0:53:57.319
<v Speaker 1>like I want to be like these guys.

0:53:57.400 --> 0:54:01.080
<v Speaker 2>Right, I want to model myself after Yeah, I want to.

0:54:01.080 --> 0:54:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Be as hot and Vicious's Brad pitt You know, none

0:54:05.080 --> 0:54:08.760
<v Speaker 1>of that here, even though Pattinson is bringing the body,

0:54:08.800 --> 0:54:12.200
<v Speaker 1>it's just it's not the same. And so I really

0:54:12.239 --> 0:54:15.239
<v Speaker 1>appreciate that you love the space that I appreciate the

0:54:15.360 --> 0:54:18.480
<v Speaker 1>odd ratio. I appreciate that he went back to working

0:54:18.520 --> 0:54:22.160
<v Speaker 1>with animals despite having a terrible time working with him. Yeah,

0:54:22.160 --> 0:54:25.759
<v Speaker 1>and his first film, he really to mine Eyes has

0:54:25.800 --> 0:54:29.200
<v Speaker 1>pushed himself as a director to get better and try

0:54:29.400 --> 0:54:31.719
<v Speaker 1>new things and get out of his comfort zone. And

0:54:31.760 --> 0:54:35.719
<v Speaker 1>I think that's where great art is made. What is

0:54:36.080 --> 0:54:38.200
<v Speaker 1>the Lighthouse leave you with? And how likely are you

0:54:38.239 --> 0:54:40.040
<v Speaker 1>to watch it again sometime soon?

0:54:40.840 --> 0:54:42.960
<v Speaker 2>Well, this was the second time I watched it in

0:54:43.000 --> 0:54:45.839
<v Speaker 2>one gear. I do think I want to go back

0:54:45.840 --> 0:54:48.680
<v Speaker 2>and watch it again, maybe in the new year, and

0:54:48.800 --> 0:54:52.800
<v Speaker 2>just to kind of again process everything that we talked about,

0:54:53.520 --> 0:54:56.359
<v Speaker 2>because you know, on my first two watches, I was

0:54:56.560 --> 0:55:02.800
<v Speaker 2>a little bit confused as to how what the ending meant,

0:55:03.040 --> 0:55:10.040
<v Speaker 2>you know, but I still respected as like some as

0:55:10.080 --> 0:55:13.040
<v Speaker 2>you said that something that can you can add your

0:55:13.080 --> 0:55:16.000
<v Speaker 2>own interpretation to. I like the fact that he doesn't

0:55:16.040 --> 0:55:17.799
<v Speaker 2>like lay it on thick in the sense like this

0:55:17.880 --> 0:55:21.280
<v Speaker 2>is exactly what it's supposed to mean and that people

0:55:21.320 --> 0:55:26.120
<v Speaker 2>can really add their own, you know, their own thoughts

0:55:26.200 --> 0:55:28.080
<v Speaker 2>and beliefs into it and just kind of see their

0:55:28.080 --> 0:55:31.480
<v Speaker 2>own reflection in it. But yeah, as a woman, it

0:55:31.520 --> 0:55:37.799
<v Speaker 2>doesn't necessarily particularly speak to me because I'm just like,

0:55:38.120 --> 0:55:41.160
<v Speaker 2>you know, can can everybody stop being such guys about

0:55:41.200 --> 0:55:44.719
<v Speaker 2>everything and just you know, actually talk and connect with

0:55:44.800 --> 0:55:50.640
<v Speaker 2>each other and just chill. But you know, it's it's

0:55:50.719 --> 0:55:55.880
<v Speaker 2>It's definitely one that I think probably leaves more men

0:55:56.640 --> 0:55:59.160
<v Speaker 2>with like these thoughts of like, wow, what is my

0:55:59.239 --> 0:56:03.000
<v Speaker 2>masculinity actually mean? And so I would be curious to

0:56:03.080 --> 0:56:06.160
<v Speaker 2>get I would be curious. I tried to get my

0:56:06.200 --> 0:56:07.960
<v Speaker 2>boyfriend to watch this one with me, and he wouldn't

0:56:07.960 --> 0:56:09.520
<v Speaker 2>watch it with me because he was.

0:56:09.480 --> 0:56:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Like, my boyfriend is not that scary. It's more trippy,

0:56:14.120 --> 0:56:15.200
<v Speaker 1>even scary. Come.

0:56:16.320 --> 0:56:18.560
<v Speaker 2>So I really want to get a man's read for

0:56:18.680 --> 0:56:20.799
<v Speaker 2>how they feel about what men.

0:56:21.480 --> 0:56:23.799
<v Speaker 1>Twice we have asked for your opinion, it probably won't

0:56:23.840 --> 0:56:26.680
<v Speaker 1>happen again, so feel free to just really let us

0:56:26.719 --> 0:56:29.560
<v Speaker 1>know how you feel about the horror movies and why,

0:56:29.760 --> 0:56:33.080
<v Speaker 1>and specifically how you feel about this movie before we go.

0:56:33.360 --> 0:56:35.120
<v Speaker 1>I just want to say with the black and white,

0:56:35.160 --> 0:56:36.880
<v Speaker 1>I find it really interesting. I actually, while I was

0:56:36.920 --> 0:56:40.120
<v Speaker 1>watching this, was really thinking about No Serratu, the story

0:56:40.200 --> 0:56:43.319
<v Speaker 1>and what we have already, and I had to go

0:56:43.360 --> 0:56:45.960
<v Speaker 1>and I was like, wait, is it in black and white? Nos? Not,

0:56:46.000 --> 0:56:48.760
<v Speaker 1>It's in color. But if you look at the images

0:56:48.760 --> 0:56:53.719
<v Speaker 1>they've released so far, it is very heavily leaning into grayscale,

0:56:54.080 --> 0:56:56.759
<v Speaker 1>which is a new and fun way. Like again, it's

0:56:56.760 --> 0:57:02.200
<v Speaker 1>like living yeah, not that shitty filtered blue. Like it's

0:57:02.280 --> 0:57:04.320
<v Speaker 1>very exciting to me to be like, oh, you're working

0:57:04.360 --> 0:57:07.319
<v Speaker 1>mostly in black and white, gray scale in it within

0:57:07.360 --> 0:57:09.719
<v Speaker 1>a color film. And then it seems to me to

0:57:09.760 --> 0:57:13.600
<v Speaker 1>be really leaning into fire and light a sort of

0:57:13.600 --> 0:57:16.560
<v Speaker 1>a contrast to that element. And if you watch The Northman,

0:57:16.600 --> 0:57:19.320
<v Speaker 1>which you should because we're gonna cover it next week, Uh,

0:57:19.920 --> 0:57:23.120
<v Speaker 1>they use the blue of the night sky and fire

0:57:23.200 --> 0:57:27.320
<v Speaker 1>as contrasting points of visual color throughout that film in

0:57:27.400 --> 0:57:30.520
<v Speaker 1>a resting way. I cannot wait to talk about The Northman.

0:57:31.000 --> 0:57:31.120
<v Speaker 4>Uh.

0:57:31.680 --> 0:57:34.760
<v Speaker 1>I really love this film, like kind of unapologetically and

0:57:34.960 --> 0:57:38.600
<v Speaker 1>very much into it. This is another film that explores masculinity,

0:57:38.640 --> 0:57:40.720
<v Speaker 1>but in a different kind of way, more in an

0:57:40.760 --> 0:57:45.320
<v Speaker 1>inherited father to son way than a general societal pressure way.

0:57:45.640 --> 0:57:49.120
<v Speaker 1>And also Anya's back in a very fun, different type

0:57:49.120 --> 0:57:51.680
<v Speaker 1>of witchy role, so there can be a lot for

0:57:51.760 --> 0:57:53.160
<v Speaker 1>us to break down in the Northmen.

0:57:53.800 --> 0:57:56.280
<v Speaker 2>And it's the one ager's movie the guys on our

0:57:56.440 --> 0:57:58.080
<v Speaker 2>on our team have watched.

0:57:58.720 --> 0:58:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, Aaron, my peachy, that's gonna be exciting. Yeah.

0:58:04.760 --> 0:58:06.360
<v Speaker 1>Is there anything else you want to say about the

0:58:06.440 --> 0:58:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Lighthouse before we get out of here? No?

0:58:08.800 --> 0:58:11.280
<v Speaker 2>I just love it and it really feels and I

0:58:11.320 --> 0:58:14.680
<v Speaker 2>know that, you know, Lovecraft is a controversial figure, but

0:58:14.880 --> 0:58:18.440
<v Speaker 2>I just I love the use of these there. What

0:58:18.600 --> 0:58:21.000
<v Speaker 2>really captivated me the first time I watched it was

0:58:21.040 --> 0:58:24.320
<v Speaker 2>the use of that ultraviolet kind of purple color, which

0:58:24.320 --> 0:58:26.560
<v Speaker 2>is which is known to be kind of like a

0:58:26.640 --> 0:58:30.600
<v Speaker 2>cosmic horror sort of color. I love the use of

0:58:30.640 --> 0:58:33.200
<v Speaker 2>like the tentacles and all of these things that make

0:58:33.240 --> 0:58:35.880
<v Speaker 2>you think like, is there some sort of like monster,

0:58:36.360 --> 0:58:39.080
<v Speaker 2>Like is there some sort of like unseen monster going

0:58:39.080 --> 0:58:41.840
<v Speaker 2>on here? Because it really adds to all of the

0:58:41.880 --> 0:58:47.240
<v Speaker 2>mystique and the mystery surrounding the movie. So those are

0:58:47.240 --> 0:58:48.960
<v Speaker 2>the things that I think I really enjoyed about. And

0:58:48.960 --> 0:58:52.360
<v Speaker 2>of course the performances from Willem Dafoe and Robert Pattinson.

0:58:52.400 --> 0:58:57.160
<v Speaker 2>Willem Dafoe really nailed. He really nailed his character and

0:58:57.520 --> 0:58:58.240
<v Speaker 2>really might have.

0:58:58.200 --> 0:59:01.480
<v Speaker 1>Been a missed opportunity for Oscars. Too disgusting for the Oscars.

0:59:01.480 --> 0:59:04.400
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I'd love to go back and wait. Let's actually,

0:59:04.440 --> 0:59:07.400
<v Speaker 1>let's see who were the If this movie comes out

0:59:07.400 --> 0:59:11.320
<v Speaker 1>in twenty nineteen, then it's eligible for twenty twenty Oscars.

0:59:12.080 --> 0:59:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Let's see twenty twenty eight Oscars. The other question, do

0:59:15.640 --> 0:59:19.600
<v Speaker 1>you think he would have been best supporting or.

0:59:20.840 --> 0:59:25.480
<v Speaker 2>Lead should have been made? I think Robert Pattinson felt

0:59:25.520 --> 0:59:28.960
<v Speaker 2>more I know that he was kind of the main character,

0:59:29.280 --> 0:59:36.360
<v Speaker 2>but Robert Patson felt more like a supporting character to

0:59:36.480 --> 0:59:39.680
<v Speaker 2>Willem Dafoe's performances because his performances were so big and

0:59:39.720 --> 0:59:43.880
<v Speaker 2>they were so like grand you know. It's funny Parasite

0:59:43.920 --> 0:59:47.640
<v Speaker 2>won Best Picture that year and Joker had eleven nominations.

0:59:48.080 --> 0:59:49.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that was a sad year. It's also the year

0:59:49.960 --> 0:59:52.280
<v Speaker 1>of Jojo Rabbit, which initially I liked and then I

0:59:52.320 --> 0:59:55.040
<v Speaker 1>was like, I'm not quite sure how I feel about it.

0:59:55.440 --> 0:59:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Marriage Story nine seventeen. Once upon a time, we were

0:59:57.880 --> 1:00:00.320
<v Speaker 1>dealing with some great films and I'm not even gonna lie.

1:00:00.560 --> 1:00:03.360
<v Speaker 1>I think was that the year? Oh god, what Best

1:00:03.360 --> 1:00:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Supporting Actor?

1:00:04.760 --> 1:00:08.040
<v Speaker 2>He didn't even get Best Director nomination? What the hell?

1:00:08.160 --> 1:00:12.120
<v Speaker 1>Mm mmm, yeah, it was a strange year. No, to

1:00:12.160 --> 1:00:15.240
<v Speaker 1>your point, Carmenate, don't think that there were any nominations

1:00:15.280 --> 1:00:20.280
<v Speaker 1>for this film. Okay, Best Supporting Actor Brad pitt One

1:00:20.320 --> 1:00:22.280
<v Speaker 1>from Once Point a Time in Hollywood is clipped booth.

1:00:22.560 --> 1:00:26.200
<v Speaker 1>Tom Hanks was nominated for a Beautiful Day in the

1:00:26.200 --> 1:00:29.240
<v Speaker 1>Neighborhood is Fred Rogers? Now, how is he Best Supporting Actor?

1:00:29.440 --> 1:00:32.240
<v Speaker 1>Someone make it makes sense. He's a titular character. But

1:00:32.440 --> 1:00:35.840
<v Speaker 1>oh my god. Anthony Hopkins was nominated for two Popes

1:00:35.840 --> 1:00:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Appacino for The Irishman and Joe Peshy also for The Irishman.

1:00:39.040 --> 1:00:41.520
<v Speaker 1>The Irishman. Yeah, I don't think anyone. Again, I'm not

1:00:41.520 --> 1:00:43.680
<v Speaker 1>sure anybody would have voted for this. It's very disgusting.

1:00:43.720 --> 1:00:45.160
<v Speaker 1>It's not an Oscar winner.

1:00:45.880 --> 1:00:49.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the Oscars are not. As we know, the Oscars

1:00:49.840 --> 1:00:53.520
<v Speaker 2>are not a barometer for what's actually good the culture.

1:00:53.680 --> 1:00:58.920
<v Speaker 1>Necessarily, it gave a keen phoenix his Oscar for playing

1:00:58.960 --> 1:01:04.560
<v Speaker 1>the Joker, which, okay, fine, listen, it's a solid performance

1:01:04.560 --> 1:01:05.840
<v Speaker 1>in a shitty film. To me.

1:01:06.800 --> 1:01:10.760
<v Speaker 2>It had one nomination. Oh they did win for Okay,

1:01:10.800 --> 1:01:14.360
<v Speaker 2>it nominated for was nominated at the Oscars for Best Cinematography,

1:01:14.880 --> 1:01:18.040
<v Speaker 2>which feels okay, Yeah, I mean that's good, but it

1:01:18.080 --> 1:01:22.120
<v Speaker 2>still feels like I feel like Robert Eckers maybe deserved

1:01:22.160 --> 1:01:24.000
<v Speaker 2>Best Director nomination at least.

1:01:24.120 --> 1:01:26.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he's really getting a lot out of these actors.

1:01:26.560 --> 1:01:30.600
<v Speaker 1>And it's an argument I would have heard, Wait a minute,

1:01:30.600 --> 1:01:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Best Directors, Bonking home one for Parasite. He should have

1:01:33.640 --> 1:01:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Sam Mendez nineteen seventeen. That film is a doozy to

1:01:36.720 --> 1:01:40.280
<v Speaker 1>get through, really like emotionally impactful. I agree with that nomination.

1:01:40.320 --> 1:01:42.440
<v Speaker 1>Tarantino for a Once upon a Time in Hollywood, Okay,

1:01:42.800 --> 1:01:47.880
<v Speaker 1>Todd Philips for Joker Again, I say, okay, gets nominated.

1:01:48.600 --> 1:01:51.160
<v Speaker 1>I could kick Todd or Tarantino out of this category

1:01:51.200 --> 1:01:54.200
<v Speaker 1>to make room for Eggers in this I would absolutely

1:01:54.240 --> 1:01:57.600
<v Speaker 1>hear that argument. I didn't think we're gonna get to

1:01:57.600 --> 1:01:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Awards talk. But you know, there's a lot of this

1:02:00.280 --> 1:02:03.080
<v Speaker 1>is again. I really admire the way it's strived to

1:02:03.160 --> 1:02:06.360
<v Speaker 1>achieve and then accomplished a lot of what its drived

1:02:06.360 --> 1:02:09.280
<v Speaker 1>to do. I think it is as disgusting as it

1:02:09.320 --> 1:02:11.760
<v Speaker 1>is it's genuinely beautiful. I do think you're getting some

1:02:12.160 --> 1:02:16.160
<v Speaker 1>truly great performances. The range these guys have to go through,

1:02:16.560 --> 1:02:19.160
<v Speaker 1>the way they're pushing each other, supporting each other too,

1:02:19.480 --> 1:02:22.600
<v Speaker 1>and no one is ever outperforming. They're only sort of

1:02:22.600 --> 1:02:27.960
<v Speaker 1>bolstering each other's performances. The dialogue. I mean, really, someone

1:02:27.960 --> 1:02:31.800
<v Speaker 1>give this man a script writing nod, because the language

1:02:31.840 --> 1:02:33.360
<v Speaker 1>and the way we didn't talk too much about it

1:02:33.360 --> 1:02:36.320
<v Speaker 1>today and we do have to go. But the language

1:02:36.720 --> 1:02:40.680
<v Speaker 1>and the way he manipulates and authenticates language from the

1:02:40.720 --> 1:02:43.720
<v Speaker 1>era in the same way that he's manuscripts and stuff

1:02:43.760 --> 1:02:46.200
<v Speaker 1>to craft the language for it's the wish and use

1:02:46.240 --> 1:02:48.840
<v Speaker 1>the actual words of children who felt they were possessed

1:02:49.560 --> 1:02:52.080
<v Speaker 1>and gave it to his characters. Here he found a

1:02:52.120 --> 1:02:56.440
<v Speaker 1>woman who broke down the lexicon of different dialects along

1:02:56.480 --> 1:02:59.680
<v Speaker 1>the eastern coast of America, and he used her book

1:02:59.720 --> 1:03:02.160
<v Speaker 1>to really to write his own lines. He feels iffy

1:03:02.160 --> 1:03:04.000
<v Speaker 1>about taking the words of other people and putting it

1:03:04.040 --> 1:03:06.720
<v Speaker 1>on characters. He's like he was trying to be respectful

1:03:06.720 --> 1:03:08.520
<v Speaker 1>then he wasn't sure if it was or wasn't. I'm

1:03:08.560 --> 1:03:10.520
<v Speaker 1>not really sure where I fall along that line, but

1:03:10.560 --> 1:03:12.560
<v Speaker 1>I do love that he has put so much effort

1:03:12.600 --> 1:03:16.920
<v Speaker 1>into bringing these languages to life. The you versus ye

1:03:17.120 --> 1:03:21.919
<v Speaker 1>conversations like battle they have yees you ye. Yeah. It's

1:03:21.920 --> 1:03:24.600
<v Speaker 1>magnetic and it exemplifies so much of like they're from

1:03:24.640 --> 1:03:30.080
<v Speaker 1>different spaces, they had different trades like it really livens

1:03:30.440 --> 1:03:33.160
<v Speaker 1>the characters, and there is something to be said for

1:03:33.200 --> 1:03:36.920
<v Speaker 1>being able to write that dialogue and for people who've

1:03:36.920 --> 1:03:39.240
<v Speaker 1>never heard it before to be able to understand it clearly,

1:03:39.840 --> 1:03:42.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, not just in the addiction of the actors,

1:03:42.200 --> 1:03:45.080
<v Speaker 1>but in these words for the most part makes sense.

1:03:45.080 --> 1:03:47.800
<v Speaker 1>And if they don't, I can at least interpret from

1:03:47.800 --> 1:03:51.000
<v Speaker 1>the performance what's happening. Yes, that happens a lot in Shakespeare.

1:03:51.000 --> 1:03:53.600
<v Speaker 1>It's a difficult thing to pull off. I think he

1:03:53.640 --> 1:03:56.400
<v Speaker 1>does beautifully, So yeah, I don't. Should we end by

1:03:56.440 --> 1:03:57.600
<v Speaker 1>ranking the film?

1:03:58.000 --> 1:04:03.280
<v Speaker 2>I still think The Witch remains my favorite, agree, but

1:04:03.400 --> 1:04:08.320
<v Speaker 2>this would be my my close second for sure. Oh,

1:04:08.360 --> 1:04:11.120
<v Speaker 2>to be completely transparent here, I have yet to watch

1:04:11.160 --> 1:04:12.040
<v Speaker 2>The Northmen, I.

1:04:11.960 --> 1:04:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Compose, Oh my God, imply.

1:04:14.680 --> 1:04:16.680
<v Speaker 2>But I am going to watch it on Thanksgiving, so

1:04:16.800 --> 1:04:18.560
<v Speaker 2>it is going to be my Thanksgiving watch.

1:04:19.000 --> 1:04:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I can't wait to hear your thoughts. I think

1:04:21.680 --> 1:04:24.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm with you right now. Since we haven't reviewed The Northmen,

1:04:24.400 --> 1:04:25.960
<v Speaker 1>I will keep it based off of these two. The

1:04:25.960 --> 1:04:27.440
<v Speaker 1>Witch wins slightly ahead.

1:04:27.480 --> 1:04:27.720
<v Speaker 3>For me.

1:04:27.960 --> 1:04:34.600
<v Speaker 1>I think the tension in this is oftentimes as as

1:04:34.640 --> 1:04:37.320
<v Speaker 1>good as the Witch. But to me, the little spaces

1:04:37.320 --> 1:04:41.960
<v Speaker 1>in between the Witch are not as laborious, and by

1:04:42.000 --> 1:04:45.600
<v Speaker 1>that I mean ye beats and I can understand more

1:04:45.680 --> 1:04:50.320
<v Speaker 1>innately myself, like the looks between the parents and the

1:04:50.360 --> 1:04:53.760
<v Speaker 1>looks between the kids, like there's something more happening there

1:04:53.800 --> 1:04:56.200
<v Speaker 1>than for me, Like sometimes we're just looking at like

1:04:56.280 --> 1:04:59.640
<v Speaker 1>house equipment for like thirteen seconds, You're like, oh, Robert,

1:04:59.720 --> 1:05:03.000
<v Speaker 1>what what are we doing here? To the next thing? Please,

1:05:03.000 --> 1:05:06.600
<v Speaker 1>for the love of God. But again, Boody Tony fun

1:05:07.280 --> 1:05:10.120
<v Speaker 1>gets under your skin. Performance is so dynamic you can't

1:05:10.160 --> 1:05:13.640
<v Speaker 1>look away from the scream. A solid film and definitely

1:05:13.680 --> 1:05:15.680
<v Speaker 1>we're checking out. If you somehow got through this podcast

1:05:15.720 --> 1:05:18.280
<v Speaker 1>and have never watched a film and you weren't sure

1:05:18.320 --> 1:05:20.840
<v Speaker 1>about it, I highly suggest watching it. It is not

1:05:21.080 --> 1:05:25.480
<v Speaker 1>very scary. It does sort of mess with your brain. Yeah,

1:05:25.520 --> 1:05:27.720
<v Speaker 1>but it's good. Carmen, we did it. Thank you so

1:05:27.800 --> 1:05:30.240
<v Speaker 1>much again for being here. This was a lot of fun.

1:05:30.280 --> 1:05:32.040
<v Speaker 1>I cannot wait for our next one.

1:05:32.600 --> 1:05:33.840
<v Speaker 2>I know, I'm so excited.

1:05:34.480 --> 1:05:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Thank y'all, So thank you guys for listening. You can

1:05:37.080 --> 1:05:39.959
<v Speaker 1>join us back here tomorrow as we have our first

1:05:40.000 --> 1:05:43.720
<v Speaker 1>roundtable with They Had It Coming, an episode where we

1:05:43.800 --> 1:05:47.320
<v Speaker 1>discussed our favorite deserves death from film and television. That

1:05:47.440 --> 1:05:49.880
<v Speaker 1>on Wednesday, A book is us our next guide of

1:05:50.120 --> 1:05:54.960
<v Speaker 1>Dude Prophecy. Thursday, we're looking back at our favorite video

1:05:54.960 --> 1:05:58.280
<v Speaker 1>games of twenty twenty four. I didn't play many, but

1:05:58.320 --> 1:06:01.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm excited to hear what y'all loved. Thinking him back

1:06:01.240 --> 1:06:03.520
<v Speaker 1>on Monday, where Carmen and are going to break down

1:06:03.520 --> 1:06:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Egger's most recent film, The Norseman. That's the episode. Thanks

1:06:07.640 --> 1:06:16.600
<v Speaker 1>for listening, Bye y'all. X ray Vision is hosted by

1:06:16.680 --> 1:06:17.120
<v Speaker 1>Jason N.

1:06:17.200 --> 1:06:21.600
<v Speaker 5>Supsion and Rosie Knight and is a production of iHeart Podcasts.

1:06:22.240 --> 1:06:26.040
<v Speaker 5>Our executive producers are Joelle Smith and Aaron Kaufman. Our

1:06:26.080 --> 1:06:30.920
<v Speaker 5>supervising producer is a Boo Zafar. Our producers are Carmen

1:06:31.040 --> 1:06:35.800
<v Speaker 5>Laurent and Mia Taylor. Our theme song is by Brian Basquez.

1:06:36.280 --> 1:06:40.560
<v Speaker 5>Special thanks to Soul Rubin and Chris Lord, Kenny Goodman

1:06:40.920 --> 1:06:43.000
<v Speaker 5>and Heidi on Disco Moderata