1 00:00:00,080 --> 00:00:04,000 Speaker 1: Bruce Richards, co founder and CEO of Marathon Asset Management, 2 00:00:04,280 --> 00:00:06,560 Speaker 1: and Bruce All the talk last week, of course was 3 00:00:06,559 --> 00:00:08,760 Speaker 1: about the FED, what they didn't do, but more importantly 4 00:00:08,760 --> 00:00:11,559 Speaker 1: what they're telegraphing and a market. When you look at 5 00:00:11,560 --> 00:00:13,960 Speaker 1: what's happening in treasuries and you look what's happening inequities 6 00:00:14,040 --> 00:00:16,279 Speaker 1: right now, it doesn't seem to think the Fed is 7 00:00:16,280 --> 00:00:18,360 Speaker 1: going to hold rates as high as they seem to 8 00:00:18,400 --> 00:00:18,919 Speaker 1: say they are. 9 00:00:19,239 --> 00:00:21,959 Speaker 2: Well, you could say that, or then you can just 10 00:00:22,040 --> 00:00:23,720 Speaker 2: listen to what the man had to say at the 11 00:00:23,720 --> 00:00:28,040 Speaker 2: pressure last week when FED Chairman Palell showed us the 12 00:00:28,080 --> 00:00:30,960 Speaker 2: dots and share with us that there will be only 13 00:00:31,000 --> 00:00:34,159 Speaker 2: one easing this year, it's a very far cry from 14 00:00:34,440 --> 00:00:36,920 Speaker 2: you know, six that was expected by the market coming 15 00:00:36,920 --> 00:00:40,200 Speaker 2: into the year. So, yes, the inflation number is getting 16 00:00:40,240 --> 00:00:43,560 Speaker 2: softer and trending down towards that you know two percent 17 00:00:43,600 --> 00:00:46,400 Speaker 2: goal that everyone wants to see, and it's really good news. 18 00:00:46,680 --> 00:00:49,760 Speaker 2: But here's the thing that I'm thinking about. If you're 19 00:00:50,400 --> 00:00:53,559 Speaker 2: FED chairman Pale, are you going to ease so quickly 20 00:00:53,960 --> 00:00:58,040 Speaker 2: when EPI markets are all time highs, job markets are 21 00:00:58,720 --> 00:01:01,800 Speaker 2: incredibly strong and rob lost and economy is strong because 22 00:01:01,840 --> 00:01:05,280 Speaker 2: if you were to ease, might it just inflate a 23 00:01:05,280 --> 00:01:11,039 Speaker 2: little bit more the economy, equity markets and cause these 24 00:01:11,040 --> 00:01:13,400 Speaker 2: animal spirits to come back and inflation to come back. 25 00:01:13,440 --> 00:01:15,440 Speaker 2: And so they're going to go I think, very very 26 00:01:15,480 --> 00:01:18,640 Speaker 2: slowly and very very cautiously. So you might expect one 27 00:01:18,680 --> 00:01:21,080 Speaker 2: ease or two eases and then a long pause to 28 00:01:21,120 --> 00:01:24,200 Speaker 2: see did it do anything to reinflate inflation? 29 00:01:24,880 --> 00:01:27,000 Speaker 1: Yeah, but it is all this ends up being academic 30 00:01:27,080 --> 00:01:29,360 Speaker 1: to a certain extent because we keep talking about what 31 00:01:29,720 --> 00:01:31,480 Speaker 1: the Fed may or may not do. And the question 32 00:01:31,520 --> 00:01:34,119 Speaker 1: I really I guess I really have is does it matter, 33 00:01:34,600 --> 00:01:36,680 Speaker 1: right at least in the hearing now for the economy 34 00:01:36,720 --> 00:01:38,880 Speaker 1: and the markets. I mean, twenty five basis points, even 35 00:01:38,880 --> 00:01:40,160 Speaker 1: fifty basis points are easing. 36 00:01:40,319 --> 00:01:43,000 Speaker 2: Does that have a material us? Economy is so strong, 37 00:01:43,200 --> 00:01:45,440 Speaker 2: And the reason why it doesn't have a material impact 38 00:01:45,720 --> 00:01:49,240 Speaker 2: is because the Fed really doesn't matter. That's really hard 39 00:01:49,280 --> 00:01:51,480 Speaker 2: to say. No, they don't want to matter, given the 40 00:01:51,480 --> 00:01:54,880 Speaker 2: amount of fiscal stimulus has happened, and the fiscal stimuluss 41 00:01:54,880 --> 00:02:00,120 Speaker 2: has been so exorbit so huge, never before seen in 42 00:02:00,200 --> 00:02:02,920 Speaker 2: a growth market like we've had, and yet it came 43 00:02:03,000 --> 00:02:05,440 Speaker 2: through in trillions and trillions and trillions. We're talking about 44 00:02:05,440 --> 00:02:09,240 Speaker 2: Infrastructure Act, the Chips Acted, and many other acts that 45 00:02:09,480 --> 00:02:13,200 Speaker 2: at trillions of stimulus at the time the FED was tightening. 46 00:02:13,240 --> 00:02:16,280 Speaker 2: So I would say that you're right about that. It 47 00:02:16,320 --> 00:02:18,880 Speaker 2: is a bit academic because here we are at higher 48 00:02:18,960 --> 00:02:21,680 Speaker 2: rates and economy is just fine. You have to stay 49 00:02:21,720 --> 00:02:26,799 Speaker 2: bullish because the economy is strong, jobs are strong, stock market. 50 00:02:26,800 --> 00:02:28,320 Speaker 2: We're going to see what's going to happen with second 51 00:02:28,560 --> 00:02:31,560 Speaker 2: half earnings, and we're going to have record earnings in 52 00:02:31,600 --> 00:02:34,800 Speaker 2: the third and fourth quarter. So i'd say stay bullish 53 00:02:35,040 --> 00:02:38,680 Speaker 2: for equities and stay bullsh for credit as well, because 54 00:02:38,720 --> 00:02:41,600 Speaker 2: a higher rate environment that we're seeing is really really 55 00:02:41,600 --> 00:02:44,760 Speaker 2: bullsh for the bomb market. So let's get to that. 56 00:02:44,880 --> 00:02:48,440 Speaker 3: Okay, So the higher equity market, economy is really good. 57 00:02:49,280 --> 00:02:50,679 Speaker 2: What's the bankruptcy situation? 58 00:02:50,919 --> 00:02:52,280 Speaker 3: Like, I mean, are we going to see the kind 59 00:02:52,320 --> 00:02:55,400 Speaker 3: of bankruptcies that everyone was quort of anticipating or the 60 00:02:55,400 --> 00:02:57,919 Speaker 3: weakness that we've been anticipating. What do you think? 61 00:02:58,080 --> 00:02:59,600 Speaker 2: Well, first of all, I'd start with the faultrates. The 62 00:02:59,600 --> 00:03:03,880 Speaker 2: faultrates are trending around four percent, and today about three 63 00:03:03,960 --> 00:03:07,680 Speaker 2: quarters of these defaults don't come from bankruptcies. Don't come 64 00:03:07,720 --> 00:03:12,079 Speaker 2: from Chapter eleven's They come from these LMA, these liability 65 00:03:12,120 --> 00:03:15,160 Speaker 2: management exercises or what the rating agencies referred to as 66 00:03:15,200 --> 00:03:17,960 Speaker 2: distrusted exchanges, where the creditors are crammed down they have 67 00:03:18,040 --> 00:03:22,000 Speaker 2: to receive a lower interest, payment less principle or termed 68 00:03:22,000 --> 00:03:25,240 Speaker 2: out debt, something that's adverse to them. Private equity is 69 00:03:25,360 --> 00:03:28,480 Speaker 2: very smart. They're very smart to start with in buying 70 00:03:28,480 --> 00:03:31,600 Speaker 2: companies and very smart when it comes to financial engineering. 71 00:03:31,800 --> 00:03:34,760 Speaker 2: And what they figured out is it's really costly to 72 00:03:34,800 --> 00:03:37,960 Speaker 2: put a company in bankruptcy, the business interruption cost, all 73 00:03:38,000 --> 00:03:40,080 Speaker 2: the legal costs that you go through when the company's 74 00:03:40,080 --> 00:03:42,240 Speaker 2: in bankruptcy for a year to two years, it's much 75 00:03:42,280 --> 00:03:45,800 Speaker 2: better to extract a pound of flesh from the creditors. 76 00:03:46,040 --> 00:03:48,400 Speaker 2: And with ninety percent of the brotherly syndicating loan market 77 00:03:48,560 --> 00:03:52,200 Speaker 2: being covenant light, they can do that quite efficiently by 78 00:03:52,680 --> 00:03:56,600 Speaker 2: taking assets, moving over to an unrestricted SOB, coming up 79 00:03:56,640 --> 00:03:59,760 Speaker 2: with new money solutions from folks like Marathon, who will 80 00:03:59,760 --> 00:04:04,040 Speaker 2: give the company, the private equity company, additional dollars right 81 00:04:04,560 --> 00:04:08,840 Speaker 2: to make it through and at the expense of existing creditors. 82 00:04:09,000 --> 00:04:12,080 Speaker 2: So what I would say is this is a very 83 00:04:12,120 --> 00:04:16,839 Speaker 2: favorable environment for the credit markets because while ninety to 84 00:04:16,920 --> 00:04:19,680 Speaker 2: ninety five percent of the markets can sustain these higher 85 00:04:19,800 --> 00:04:23,480 Speaker 2: rates and you're getting paid the best yields in the generation, 86 00:04:23,839 --> 00:04:26,400 Speaker 2: those other five to ten percent there's also a lot 87 00:04:26,440 --> 00:04:29,719 Speaker 2: to do for us opportunities and credit managers that are 88 00:04:30,200 --> 00:04:34,440 Speaker 2: providing capital solutions and these solutions for these distress exchanges. 89 00:04:34,520 --> 00:04:35,880 Speaker 3: It's part of that going to be in commercial real 90 00:04:36,000 --> 00:04:38,840 Speaker 3: estate because we haven't had that disaster that we've been 91 00:04:38,839 --> 00:04:39,240 Speaker 3: waiting for. 92 00:04:39,400 --> 00:04:43,640 Speaker 2: Commercial real estate is again like the pig for the python. 93 00:04:43,680 --> 00:04:48,240 Speaker 2: It's a slow process that's being worked through. So the 94 00:04:48,279 --> 00:04:51,799 Speaker 2: commercial real estate debt markets around six trillion dollars. About 95 00:04:51,800 --> 00:04:55,159 Speaker 2: half of that is held within the banks, and about 96 00:04:55,400 --> 00:04:57,839 Speaker 2: half of that is in the private credit sector between 97 00:04:57,920 --> 00:05:00,960 Speaker 2: the reads and the CMBs markets and so forth. So 98 00:05:01,000 --> 00:05:03,719 Speaker 2: the good news for commercial real estate is, and there's 99 00:05:03,800 --> 00:05:07,640 Speaker 2: very good news, is valuations are stabilized. It's a big market, 100 00:05:07,640 --> 00:05:10,320 Speaker 2: and there's lots of really attractive deals to do. That's 101 00:05:10,360 --> 00:05:12,880 Speaker 2: the good news. The bad news is that there's about 102 00:05:12,880 --> 00:05:16,600 Speaker 2: a trillion of this debt that's upside down where there's 103 00:05:16,600 --> 00:05:20,719 Speaker 2: no value left and the creditors have to work through 104 00:05:20,760 --> 00:05:24,719 Speaker 2: this process of workout, and so there's a big, huge 105 00:05:24,720 --> 00:05:25,360 Speaker 2: maturity wall. 106 00:05:25,839 --> 00:05:28,560 Speaker 1: I see the advantage of sort of doing these kind 107 00:05:28,560 --> 00:05:31,719 Speaker 1: of non bankruptcies whatever we want to call them, refinancings 108 00:05:31,800 --> 00:05:35,000 Speaker 1: or recapitalizations, if you will. Are we just kicking the 109 00:05:35,000 --> 00:05:37,520 Speaker 1: can down the road? Are we actually making these companies 110 00:05:37,839 --> 00:05:40,279 Speaker 1: healthier and in theory more sustainable. 111 00:05:40,480 --> 00:05:43,560 Speaker 2: They're more sustainable because in that process there's going to 112 00:05:43,560 --> 00:05:47,039 Speaker 2: be less debt, and the cram down itself usually relates 113 00:05:47,080 --> 00:05:50,719 Speaker 2: to less debt in certain cases. In other cases, you're right, 114 00:05:50,960 --> 00:05:53,480 Speaker 2: you're just kicking the can down the road and waiting 115 00:05:53,520 --> 00:05:56,320 Speaker 2: for a day out in the future. But if the 116 00:05:56,360 --> 00:05:59,720 Speaker 2: companies can then grow into those capital structures, that's a 117 00:05:59,800 --> 00:06:03,200 Speaker 2: very positive thing. And so quite often with these exercises 118 00:06:04,040 --> 00:06:07,680 Speaker 2: they actually can and sometimes you're right, they probably can't, 119 00:06:07,960 --> 00:06:10,760 Speaker 2: and then the bankruptcy waits down the line a year 120 00:06:10,839 --> 00:06:13,000 Speaker 2: or two years, you know, out in the future. But 121 00:06:13,040 --> 00:06:17,719 Speaker 2: in most cases, these new money solutions have the colatteral 122 00:06:17,760 --> 00:06:21,599 Speaker 2: that protects them, and so they're senior, they're secured, and 123 00:06:21,600 --> 00:06:24,039 Speaker 2: they have the colatter with the covenants in place, and 124 00:06:24,080 --> 00:06:27,800 Speaker 2: so it's really a good attractive way to put out money. 125 00:06:28,200 --> 00:06:30,720 Speaker 2: And I look across Marathon's book of all these capital 126 00:06:30,760 --> 00:06:34,440 Speaker 2: solutions are done and across industries, because private equity is 127 00:06:34,480 --> 00:06:39,120 Speaker 2: invested across industries, and you're seeing this high debt burden 128 00:06:40,000 --> 00:06:43,479 Speaker 2: not impact just one or two sectors, but really all industries. 129 00:06:43,680 --> 00:06:45,520 Speaker 3: Bruce, how do you think about the election? How do 130 00:06:45,560 --> 00:06:47,039 Speaker 3: you think about election risk right now? 131 00:06:47,120 --> 00:06:49,720 Speaker 2: Well, look at the election risks we just saw in France, right, 132 00:06:49,720 --> 00:06:53,440 Speaker 2: We're Macron called for an earlier election and he's still 133 00:06:53,480 --> 00:06:56,360 Speaker 2: going to remain president, but you know, the parliament is 134 00:06:56,440 --> 00:06:59,200 Speaker 2: up for grabs and it looks like his party's going 135 00:06:59,240 --> 00:07:00,640 Speaker 2: to lose a bunch of votes, and votes you are 136 00:07:00,640 --> 00:07:02,239 Speaker 2: going to go to the far right and far left. 137 00:07:02,600 --> 00:07:05,960 Speaker 2: And what did the stock market vote for? Well, the 138 00:07:06,080 --> 00:07:09,039 Speaker 2: CAC forty, which is the French stock market, was down 139 00:07:09,080 --> 00:07:12,320 Speaker 2: six point two percent on that news, and French bonds, 140 00:07:12,320 --> 00:07:15,360 Speaker 2: which are the odes, widen out twenty eight bases points 141 00:07:15,600 --> 00:07:18,960 Speaker 2: relative to buns. That's the biggest gap in debt versus 142 00:07:19,040 --> 00:07:22,880 Speaker 2: you know, our versus debt markets and equen markets versus 143 00:07:22,880 --> 00:07:25,000 Speaker 2: our eque marketers is up that we've seen in like 144 00:07:25,040 --> 00:07:28,120 Speaker 2: fifteen twenty years. So elections do matter, and we saw 145 00:07:28,160 --> 00:07:31,520 Speaker 2: that right there, right, And so six of the seven 146 00:07:31,640 --> 00:07:35,640 Speaker 2: G seven countries are up for election this year, and 147 00:07:35,720 --> 00:07:37,440 Speaker 2: so it's a big year. You're right, it's a year 148 00:07:37,480 --> 00:07:40,200 Speaker 2: of the election. Here in the United States, we have 149 00:07:40,240 --> 00:07:43,960 Speaker 2: a big election and although we try to stay away 150 00:07:44,000 --> 00:07:47,640 Speaker 2: from politics, this is going to affect markets in a 151 00:07:47,760 --> 00:07:51,760 Speaker 2: very big way. So think about several things. Number one, 152 00:07:52,560 --> 00:07:55,520 Speaker 2: the border itself. That's probably one of the top issues. 153 00:07:56,200 --> 00:07:58,960 Speaker 2: And people don't want to talk about border because it 154 00:07:58,960 --> 00:08:01,640 Speaker 2: doesn't relate to the comm me. Well, yes it does. 155 00:08:01,960 --> 00:08:05,480 Speaker 2: The number one driver of employment over the last three 156 00:08:05,560 --> 00:08:09,640 Speaker 2: years has been immigration. You take immigration out, jobs are flat, 157 00:08:10,480 --> 00:08:13,480 Speaker 2: and meanwhile they've been growing by leaps and bounds, hundreds 158 00:08:13,520 --> 00:08:16,480 Speaker 2: of thousands a month, you know, month after month for 159 00:08:16,560 --> 00:08:21,200 Speaker 2: three years now. We've had this great employment growth and 160 00:08:21,200 --> 00:08:24,600 Speaker 2: it's because of immigration. That's one factor. The second factor 161 00:08:25,080 --> 00:08:29,360 Speaker 2: is regulatory and regulatory capture and everything related to you know, 162 00:08:29,600 --> 00:08:33,800 Speaker 2: big government versus kind of pro business right. And so 163 00:08:34,679 --> 00:08:38,200 Speaker 2: when you think about the former president who wanted to 164 00:08:38,320 --> 00:08:42,240 Speaker 2: take a hands off approach to business versus the current administration, 165 00:08:42,320 --> 00:08:45,520 Speaker 2: President Biden and FTC, which has been kind of anti 166 00:08:45,600 --> 00:08:48,600 Speaker 2: these big M and A transactions, you'll see a very 167 00:08:48,600 --> 00:08:53,680 Speaker 2: different outcome. The investment bankers and corporate CEOs are probably 168 00:08:53,679 --> 00:08:57,920 Speaker 2: in lining up if the former president were elected to 169 00:08:58,000 --> 00:09:01,800 Speaker 2: announce deals sometime going into next year, versus kind of 170 00:09:01,840 --> 00:09:04,480 Speaker 2: hands off right now with certain these companies. And finally, 171 00:09:04,480 --> 00:09:08,600 Speaker 2: what I'd say is taxes. It's a very different tax 172 00:09:08,640 --> 00:09:13,360 Speaker 2: stand that President Bible would have versus versus the former 173 00:09:13,440 --> 00:09:16,920 Speaker 2: president with respective corporate taxes as we all know, and 174 00:09:16,960 --> 00:09:20,320 Speaker 2: what implications are there for companies as well as the 175 00:09:20,480 --> 00:09:24,160 Speaker 2: impact to higher taxes for the wealthy. So very different 176 00:09:24,160 --> 00:09:25,880 Speaker 2: policies and a lot on the line. 177 00:09:26,160 --> 00:09:28,440 Speaker 1: A lot of people would say very different policies, But 178 00:09:28,559 --> 00:09:30,520 Speaker 1: when you look at history, at some point it kind 179 00:09:30,559 --> 00:09:33,000 Speaker 1: of balance itself out, at least from an investment perspective. 180 00:09:33,280 --> 00:09:36,240 Speaker 1: Is there a point in time in this election cycle 181 00:09:36,559 --> 00:09:39,640 Speaker 1: where it is appropriate to actually act on the potential 182 00:09:39,720 --> 00:09:42,400 Speaker 1: for what could happen? Do you wait till after the election, 183 00:09:42,720 --> 00:09:44,640 Speaker 1: do you front run it, what do you do well? 184 00:09:44,720 --> 00:09:47,640 Speaker 2: One of the greatest trades of this last fifteen twenty 185 00:09:47,720 --> 00:09:50,720 Speaker 2: years is when President Obama was elected and knowing his 186 00:09:50,800 --> 00:09:54,760 Speaker 2: stance on healthcare and buying into healthcare companies in advance 187 00:09:55,160 --> 00:09:58,400 Speaker 2: of him taking office, and that had legs that took 188 00:09:58,480 --> 00:10:00,800 Speaker 2: us from years and years and years on and it's 189 00:10:00,840 --> 00:10:04,280 Speaker 2: still working to today based upon Obamacare and all the 190 00:10:04,280 --> 00:10:07,320 Speaker 2: policies and measures that we're put in place. So so yes, 191 00:10:07,400 --> 00:10:11,760 Speaker 2: I think these implications of what one administration, our current 192 00:10:11,760 --> 00:10:15,600 Speaker 2: administration might take versus the former administration might take is 193 00:10:15,720 --> 00:10:18,960 Speaker 2: very different, and we'll have implications for for sectors and 194 00:10:19,040 --> 00:10:20,119 Speaker 2: for companies specifically. 195 00:10:20,200 --> 00:10:21,560 Speaker 3: One thing that seems to stay the same in all 196 00:10:21,559 --> 00:10:23,280 Speaker 3: the research that I read is that the budget deficit, 197 00:10:23,360 --> 00:10:25,640 Speaker 3: the physcal deficit's going to grow, like no matter who's 198 00:10:25,679 --> 00:10:28,000 Speaker 3: in the White House, there's me more money in different 199 00:10:28,000 --> 00:10:28,760 Speaker 3: ways coming in. 200 00:10:29,760 --> 00:10:30,760 Speaker 2: Do you think that's that effect? 201 00:10:31,000 --> 00:10:31,559 Speaker 1: Is that true? 202 00:10:31,640 --> 00:10:32,600 Speaker 2: Do you look at it like that? 203 00:10:32,880 --> 00:10:34,640 Speaker 3: Is there a long term behind your place? 204 00:10:34,679 --> 00:10:36,960 Speaker 2: It didn't used to be the case, but now I 205 00:10:37,000 --> 00:10:39,559 Speaker 2: think it more is the case and what's baked in, 206 00:10:40,480 --> 00:10:42,480 Speaker 2: and so I wouldn't disagree with that at all. Now, 207 00:10:42,600 --> 00:10:44,960 Speaker 2: is you know, rather disappointed, you know to see how 208 00:10:45,040 --> 00:10:48,559 Speaker 2: much the deficit grew during the Republican administration because I'm 209 00:10:48,559 --> 00:10:51,520 Speaker 2: all for you know, fiscal austerity or or you know, 210 00:10:51,600 --> 00:10:56,760 Speaker 2: fiscal strength and how it's you know, been relatively indifferent. 211 00:10:56,920 --> 00:10:58,480 Speaker 2: But what I would say is I think we'd have 212 00:10:58,720 --> 00:11:03,920 Speaker 2: slightly bigger depths with the current administration that we would 213 00:11:04,120 --> 00:11:07,959 Speaker 2: with the form administration, because I think the former administrations 214 00:11:08,040 --> 00:11:11,760 Speaker 2: learned from that and wants to downsize government and wants 215 00:11:11,760 --> 00:11:15,240 Speaker 2: to downsize a lot of the benefits that so many 216 00:11:15,240 --> 00:11:18,320 Speaker 2: folks have enjoyed in these last four years. And I 217 00:11:18,320 --> 00:11:22,040 Speaker 2: think there actually might be a little greater than what 218 00:11:22,120 --> 00:11:25,640 Speaker 2: the commentators are stating and versus what you've seen in 219 00:11:25,679 --> 00:11:26,800 Speaker 2: these last few years. 220 00:11:26,840 --> 00:11:28,959 Speaker 1: We'll only have about thirty seconds left. But on that point, though, 221 00:11:29,000 --> 00:11:32,120 Speaker 1: are we focusing too much on the president himself? I mean, 222 00:11:32,120 --> 00:11:34,280 Speaker 1: I think about the elections that we just had overseas 223 00:11:34,480 --> 00:11:36,560 Speaker 1: that was less about the man at the top and 224 00:11:36,600 --> 00:11:39,080 Speaker 1: more about the legislatures or the parliaments, And I wonder 225 00:11:39,080 --> 00:11:40,880 Speaker 1: if we're going to find ourselves in the same situation 226 00:11:40,920 --> 00:11:42,920 Speaker 1: here in the US, where who's in the White House 227 00:11:43,040 --> 00:11:45,240 Speaker 1: is going to matter less than what the complexion. 228 00:11:44,840 --> 00:11:48,680 Speaker 2: Of conquers point. Executive order will be the order of 229 00:11:48,720 --> 00:11:51,079 Speaker 2: the day, more executive or more executive order than that 230 00:11:51,120 --> 00:11:56,040 Speaker 2: we've ever seen going forward, because that rubicon has already 231 00:11:56,040 --> 00:11:56,559 Speaker 2: been crossing. 232 00:11:56,720 --> 00:11:59,679 Speaker 1: Okay, all right, there's a great conversation. Always great to 233 00:11:59,720 --> 00:12:02,920 Speaker 1: have you, Richards. He's the CEO of Marathon Asset Management,