1 00:00:02,520 --> 00:00:07,040 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. 2 00:00:07,800 --> 00:00:11,160 Speaker 2: Geta Gopenath has been Deputy Managing Director of the International 3 00:00:11,160 --> 00:00:14,280 Speaker 2: Monetary Fund during one of the most transformative economic periods 4 00:00:14,280 --> 00:00:17,360 Speaker 2: in modern history, including the pandemic, inflation shock, and the 5 00:00:17,400 --> 00:00:20,000 Speaker 2: push to deglobalized. After seven years at the IMF, she's 6 00:00:20,000 --> 00:00:23,320 Speaker 2: stepping down tomorrow and joined us now for a final conversation. 7 00:00:23,520 --> 00:00:23,840 Speaker 3: Geta. 8 00:00:23,960 --> 00:00:26,480 Speaker 2: Welcome back to Bloomberg Surveillance, and thank you for sharing 9 00:00:26,480 --> 00:00:27,520 Speaker 2: your time with us this morning. 10 00:00:27,760 --> 00:00:29,840 Speaker 3: Let's start there. Let's look at your. 11 00:00:29,720 --> 00:00:32,120 Speaker 2: Time at the International Monetary Fund. Just how much has 12 00:00:32,240 --> 00:00:34,280 Speaker 2: changed over almost a decade. 13 00:00:36,159 --> 00:00:38,839 Speaker 4: Hi, I'm a pleasure to join you. Pretty much. I 14 00:00:38,840 --> 00:00:43,040 Speaker 4: think everything has changed. I started at the IMF in 15 00:00:43,120 --> 00:00:46,440 Speaker 4: twenty nineteen, and that feels like that was the calm 16 00:00:46,479 --> 00:00:49,120 Speaker 4: before the storm, and you had the pandemic, you had 17 00:00:49,240 --> 00:00:53,120 Speaker 4: warn Ukraine, and now geoeconomic fragmentation. I think the global 18 00:00:53,159 --> 00:00:57,920 Speaker 4: economic order is transforming in ways we haven't seen in decades, 19 00:00:58,160 --> 00:01:03,240 Speaker 4: and it's still highly unclear where the global economy will settle. 20 00:01:03,640 --> 00:01:06,280 Speaker 4: I think the second big difference between twenty nineteen and 21 00:01:06,319 --> 00:01:10,080 Speaker 4: now is on the fiscal front. Death levels are incredibly high, 22 00:01:10,200 --> 00:01:12,800 Speaker 4: they are ever increasing and while in the past you 23 00:01:12,880 --> 00:01:15,920 Speaker 4: might have said, so what markets will take it, that's 24 00:01:15,959 --> 00:01:18,360 Speaker 4: not the case anymore, even in advanced economies. You see 25 00:01:18,400 --> 00:01:20,760 Speaker 4: that in France, the UK, and also in terms of 26 00:01:20,800 --> 00:01:23,720 Speaker 4: long yields in the US. And I say that third 27 00:01:23,720 --> 00:01:27,520 Speaker 4: big change is on technology. AI over the last few 28 00:01:27,560 --> 00:01:30,920 Speaker 4: years has certainly cut the imagination of everybody. Huge promise 29 00:01:31,160 --> 00:01:32,400 Speaker 4: but also huge risks. 30 00:01:32,920 --> 00:01:35,440 Speaker 1: How has the IMF's for all changed during this period, 31 00:01:35,600 --> 00:01:38,959 Speaker 1: given that it was set up under a very different 32 00:01:38,959 --> 00:01:40,640 Speaker 1: infrastructure at a time, and a lot of people are 33 00:01:40,680 --> 00:01:43,959 Speaker 1: saying we're now in the post Breton Woods. 34 00:01:43,640 --> 00:01:51,200 Speaker 4: Era, the IMF has great experience dealing with turbulence. You know, 35 00:01:51,240 --> 00:01:52,920 Speaker 4: there was a period when you had the end of 36 00:01:53,000 --> 00:01:57,600 Speaker 4: Breton Woods going off the fixed exchange rate to the 37 00:01:57,680 --> 00:02:00,960 Speaker 4: dollar and the dollar to gold. That change happened and 38 00:02:01,600 --> 00:02:04,880 Speaker 4: the IMF adapted, and we are obviously now in a 39 00:02:04,920 --> 00:02:08,120 Speaker 4: world with big shifts in terms of how countries work 40 00:02:08,200 --> 00:02:12,080 Speaker 4: with each other. The IMF has always functioned as trying 41 00:02:12,080 --> 00:02:14,240 Speaker 4: to do the art of the possible, which is due 42 00:02:14,440 --> 00:02:16,800 Speaker 4: the best you can given the constraints, and done it 43 00:02:16,880 --> 00:02:19,880 Speaker 4: very successfully. So if ever there was a time for 44 00:02:19,919 --> 00:02:24,119 Speaker 4: this institution, it's super important now it has the ability 45 00:02:24,160 --> 00:02:27,799 Speaker 4: to bring different countries together around the table, good discussions 46 00:02:27,800 --> 00:02:31,400 Speaker 4: to happen in the economy. On the outlook, again, a 47 00:02:31,639 --> 00:02:33,560 Speaker 4: very vital institution for the world. 48 00:02:33,720 --> 00:02:35,760 Speaker 1: Do you see a risk that it doesn't survive though 49 00:02:35,840 --> 00:02:39,200 Speaker 1: at a time when funding is really in question with 50 00:02:39,280 --> 00:02:42,320 Speaker 1: a lot of major economies, we've seen China go it alone. 51 00:02:42,400 --> 00:02:44,400 Speaker 1: There have been questions about the United States. 52 00:02:46,280 --> 00:02:50,160 Speaker 4: Firstly, the IMFs funding structure doesn't rely on any budgetary 53 00:02:50,160 --> 00:02:53,440 Speaker 4: support from any country, so it's in a very strong 54 00:02:53,560 --> 00:02:57,320 Speaker 4: place because of that, and everything we've seen so far 55 00:02:57,760 --> 00:03:01,639 Speaker 4: points to all the members wanting the IMF to continue 56 00:03:01,639 --> 00:03:04,120 Speaker 4: functioning as it has. We work very closely with the 57 00:03:04,200 --> 00:03:09,680 Speaker 4: US administration. That engagement is going extremely well, but also 58 00:03:09,800 --> 00:03:12,840 Speaker 4: the other one hundred and ninety member countries that we 59 00:03:12,960 --> 00:03:16,760 Speaker 4: have so as of now, lots of support. Of course, 60 00:03:16,800 --> 00:03:18,640 Speaker 4: the environment has changed and the IMF is going to 61 00:03:18,680 --> 00:03:21,639 Speaker 4: adapt to it in this new geopolitical environment that we have, 62 00:03:22,120 --> 00:03:24,280 Speaker 4: but it has a lot of experience dealing with these 63 00:03:24,360 --> 00:03:25,239 Speaker 4: kinds of events. 64 00:03:25,400 --> 00:03:27,480 Speaker 1: One thing that you've done during your tenure at the 65 00:03:27,520 --> 00:03:30,519 Speaker 1: IMF is really study the change in the geopolitical relationship. 66 00:03:30,600 --> 00:03:33,480 Speaker 1: You've talked a lot about that including the reliance on 67 00:03:33,520 --> 00:03:35,800 Speaker 1: the dollar, and that's been a point of big speculation 68 00:03:35,960 --> 00:03:39,160 Speaker 1: of late in markets as well. How much you actually 69 00:03:39,240 --> 00:03:44,240 Speaker 1: seeing worldwide nations try to shift to alternatives from the 70 00:03:44,280 --> 00:03:47,240 Speaker 1: green back, this idea of insulating themselves from some of 71 00:03:47,240 --> 00:03:49,680 Speaker 1: the policy uncertainty that have made a lot of headlines 72 00:03:49,720 --> 00:03:50,080 Speaker 1: this year. 73 00:03:52,120 --> 00:03:55,880 Speaker 4: So we do see small shifts on the margin. We 74 00:03:55,960 --> 00:03:59,760 Speaker 4: are seeing countries diversifying out of the US, but again 75 00:03:59,840 --> 00:04:03,080 Speaker 4: on the margin because they were so exposed to the 76 00:04:03,160 --> 00:04:05,280 Speaker 4: US averal of them are hedging against dollar risk. 77 00:04:05,320 --> 00:04:06,720 Speaker 5: We're seeing some of that too. 78 00:04:06,840 --> 00:04:10,000 Speaker 4: But I think the narrative that somehow something is dramatically 79 00:04:10,080 --> 00:04:13,160 Speaker 4: changed about the behavior of the dollar, it's really too early. 80 00:04:13,320 --> 00:04:16,240 Speaker 4: People point to the correlation between what's happening with long 81 00:04:16,320 --> 00:04:19,680 Speaker 4: term bond eels and the strength of the dollar and saying, well, 82 00:04:19,680 --> 00:04:22,200 Speaker 4: that's changed, and therefore something has changed dramatically. 83 00:04:22,279 --> 00:04:24,360 Speaker 5: That's not the case. We take long enough period. 84 00:04:24,640 --> 00:04:28,720 Speaker 4: The relationship between the dollar and borrowing costs is you know, 85 00:04:29,320 --> 00:04:31,960 Speaker 4: it can move in different ways, so there's nothing unprecedented. 86 00:04:32,560 --> 00:04:35,120 Speaker 4: But of course these are still early days. We shall 87 00:04:35,160 --> 00:04:38,160 Speaker 4: see where all of the shifts in the global economic 88 00:04:38,279 --> 00:04:41,039 Speaker 4: order are headed. And I think that's the source of 89 00:04:41,080 --> 00:04:43,720 Speaker 4: tremendous uncertainty that's still weighing on the world economy. 90 00:04:43,800 --> 00:04:46,880 Speaker 1: How much has any perceived loss of FED independence changed that? 91 00:04:47,200 --> 00:04:50,000 Speaker 1: And we've been talking about how there's this dissonance between 92 00:04:50,279 --> 00:04:54,640 Speaker 1: the commentary by a lot of analysts and economists about 93 00:04:54,640 --> 00:04:56,960 Speaker 1: the fear of some sort of loss of independence and 94 00:04:56,960 --> 00:04:58,720 Speaker 1: then a lack of market reaction that you would kind 95 00:04:58,720 --> 00:05:00,840 Speaker 1: of expect on the other side. Are you seeing any 96 00:05:00,920 --> 00:05:03,239 Speaker 1: shifts that maybe are less visible. 97 00:05:05,640 --> 00:05:08,919 Speaker 4: I think everybody agrees, and this would be markets and 98 00:05:09,839 --> 00:05:15,440 Speaker 4: economic professionals, policymakers. Everybody agrees that central bank independence is critical, 99 00:05:15,520 --> 00:05:18,880 Speaker 4: launetary policy independence is critical. So if we are not 100 00:05:18,920 --> 00:05:21,760 Speaker 4: seeing much market reaction, it must be that people think 101 00:05:21,760 --> 00:05:26,840 Speaker 4: that well, that independence is still intact, that independence has 102 00:05:26,839 --> 00:05:30,000 Speaker 4: been critical to bring down inflation from the high levels 103 00:05:30,040 --> 00:05:34,040 Speaker 4: we saw post pandemic inflation. Expectations were anchored because of that, 104 00:05:34,080 --> 00:05:34,960 Speaker 4: inflation came down. 105 00:05:35,000 --> 00:05:37,640 Speaker 5: So I don't think there's any ibsen butts about that. 106 00:05:38,279 --> 00:05:42,680 Speaker 4: It must be that everybody still believes that independence, especially 107 00:05:42,680 --> 00:05:45,600 Speaker 4: operational independence in terms of setting luntary policy rates, will 108 00:05:45,640 --> 00:05:46,200 Speaker 4: be maintained. 109 00:05:46,720 --> 00:05:49,000 Speaker 1: So you reject the idea that the market's just somehow 110 00:05:49,279 --> 00:05:51,520 Speaker 1: ignoring a reality or something like that. You think the 111 00:05:51,560 --> 00:05:53,480 Speaker 1: market's speaking and that we should listen to the market. 112 00:05:54,680 --> 00:05:56,960 Speaker 4: Oh, I just think that everybody at this point is 113 00:05:57,360 --> 00:06:01,840 Speaker 4: functioning on the fog of uncertainty. There's really a lot 114 00:06:01,880 --> 00:06:04,840 Speaker 4: of information thrown out there. 115 00:06:04,880 --> 00:06:06,360 Speaker 5: Separating the week from the chef. 116 00:06:06,480 --> 00:06:08,919 Speaker 4: It's not that easy, and so I think everybody is 117 00:06:08,920 --> 00:06:12,240 Speaker 4: on wait and see mode. And right now, at least, 118 00:06:12,279 --> 00:06:15,440 Speaker 4: of course, I think that the markets are putting very 119 00:06:15,520 --> 00:06:19,080 Speaker 4: very low probability on any big negative event that may 120 00:06:19,080 --> 00:06:22,120 Speaker 4: be excessive. I think is more to worry about than 121 00:06:22,160 --> 00:06:25,320 Speaker 4: what the markets are showing right now. But again, we 122 00:06:25,360 --> 00:06:26,320 Speaker 4: should have to wait and see. 123 00:06:26,560 --> 00:06:28,320 Speaker 3: GATA. Let's put some of these things together. 124 00:06:28,400 --> 00:06:30,960 Speaker 2: If you look at developments in the UK, in France, 125 00:06:31,040 --> 00:06:34,080 Speaker 2: the inability to address fiscal concerns and find that additional 126 00:06:34,080 --> 00:06:37,279 Speaker 2: fiscal space, the latest developments here in America as well, 127 00:06:37,520 --> 00:06:39,919 Speaker 2: are you witnessing Do you think we're witnessing a convergence 128 00:06:39,960 --> 00:06:42,359 Speaker 2: between the kind of dynamics we typically see an EM 129 00:06:42,760 --> 00:06:46,600 Speaker 2: with DM and do you think those terms are useful anymore? 130 00:06:46,760 --> 00:06:47,960 Speaker 3: In quite the same way. 131 00:06:50,279 --> 00:06:53,359 Speaker 4: I think we have certainly moved away from the case 132 00:06:53,440 --> 00:06:58,600 Speaker 4: of advanced economies rich economies can keep increasing their debt, 133 00:06:58,640 --> 00:07:01,880 Speaker 4: which is what's projected to happen, and there's not much 134 00:07:01,920 --> 00:07:05,120 Speaker 4: to worry about. I think we certainly pass that major 135 00:07:05,720 --> 00:07:09,200 Speaker 4: economies are beginning to worry about what's happening to their eels. 136 00:07:09,240 --> 00:07:11,560 Speaker 4: You're seeing that it's a major concern in France right 137 00:07:11,560 --> 00:07:15,360 Speaker 4: now as we speak. But even in the US long 138 00:07:15,440 --> 00:07:18,280 Speaker 4: term meals are basically back to pre GFC level. We 139 00:07:18,320 --> 00:07:21,240 Speaker 4: are away from that world of a big global savings glucked, 140 00:07:21,320 --> 00:07:24,200 Speaker 4: away from that world of central banks buying large amounts 141 00:07:24,240 --> 00:07:25,280 Speaker 4: of government assets. 142 00:07:25,560 --> 00:07:27,600 Speaker 5: So I think it would be really. 143 00:07:29,040 --> 00:07:34,240 Speaker 4: Complacent for any government, rich or poor to say that, well, no, 144 00:07:34,720 --> 00:07:37,280 Speaker 4: our debt will always be bought. And I think one 145 00:07:37,320 --> 00:07:39,040 Speaker 4: point I want to make is that we talk about 146 00:07:39,080 --> 00:07:42,840 Speaker 4: resilience for the global economy, which has been really the 147 00:07:42,840 --> 00:07:46,360 Speaker 4: the positive of these last many years, despite all these shocks. 148 00:07:46,840 --> 00:07:50,160 Speaker 5: But we should recognize that the reason we've seen resilience. 149 00:07:49,720 --> 00:07:53,480 Speaker 4: Is because we haven't had a financial crisis. Despite the pandemic, 150 00:07:53,560 --> 00:07:58,160 Speaker 4: despite wards, despite geoeconomic fragmentation, despite FED rates going up 151 00:07:58,280 --> 00:08:01,360 Speaker 4: very sharply, we've not had a financial crisis. That doesn't 152 00:08:01,440 --> 00:08:03,960 Speaker 4: mean that that will never happen. We have very high 153 00:08:04,080 --> 00:08:06,400 Speaker 4: levels of debt around the world. I think bond markets 154 00:08:06,400 --> 00:08:08,880 Speaker 4: are in. 155 00:08:08,520 --> 00:08:09,480 Speaker 5: A fragile place. 156 00:08:10,160 --> 00:08:14,080 Speaker 4: You have valuations in equity markets that are sky high. 157 00:08:14,520 --> 00:08:16,920 Speaker 4: So I would say trede carefully because if you do 158 00:08:16,960 --> 00:08:19,960 Speaker 4: have a financial crisis, we know those the scarring that 159 00:08:20,040 --> 00:08:21,880 Speaker 4: comes from that is long lasting. 160 00:08:22,280 --> 00:08:24,600 Speaker 1: And when you talk about a financial crisis, some people 161 00:08:24,640 --> 00:08:27,040 Speaker 1: are wondering what can potentially trigger it. Are you saying 162 00:08:27,040 --> 00:08:30,040 Speaker 1: that the sovereign debt market of developed markets is of 163 00:08:30,080 --> 00:08:31,440 Speaker 1: the greatest concern at this point? 164 00:08:32,600 --> 00:08:34,600 Speaker 4: I mean, usually when you get a financial crisis, it's 165 00:08:34,640 --> 00:08:38,440 Speaker 4: a combination of events that can trigger it, right, And 166 00:08:38,480 --> 00:08:41,200 Speaker 4: so if you have multiple markets that seem to be 167 00:08:41,200 --> 00:08:44,640 Speaker 4: in a vulnerable position, you could end up with a 168 00:08:44,640 --> 00:08:45,679 Speaker 4: negative event, right. 169 00:08:45,720 --> 00:08:46,640 Speaker 5: And so the bond. 170 00:08:46,440 --> 00:08:48,480 Speaker 4: Markets what you're seeing with very high levels of debt 171 00:08:49,960 --> 00:08:55,199 Speaker 4: fragility associated with that equity valuations that are very high. Yes, 172 00:08:55,240 --> 00:08:58,880 Speaker 4: there's the promise that maybe AI will truly transform the world, 173 00:08:58,880 --> 00:09:01,080 Speaker 4: but as we know from the dot com even a 174 00:09:01,160 --> 00:09:03,719 Speaker 4: technology like the Internet that did transform the world went 175 00:09:03,760 --> 00:09:07,960 Speaker 4: through a boombus cycle. So that combination non bank financial 176 00:09:07,960 --> 00:09:12,480 Speaker 4: institutions we've never had a crisis, well, they've been as 177 00:09:12,600 --> 00:09:15,880 Speaker 4: large as they are right now. The amount of corporate 178 00:09:15,880 --> 00:09:21,440 Speaker 4: borrowing that's happening with nbfis much higher than pre twenty nineteen. 179 00:09:21,960 --> 00:09:24,880 Speaker 4: So there's a lot that looks stretched at this moment. 180 00:09:25,440 --> 00:09:27,920 Speaker 4: And at the same time, I think the world economy 181 00:09:27,960 --> 00:09:31,520 Speaker 4: is gambling with all kinds of new policies. So I 182 00:09:31,559 --> 00:09:36,720 Speaker 4: would say treade carefully make sure that financial supervision and 183 00:09:36,760 --> 00:09:41,280 Speaker 4: regulation is continued. See what needs to be done with 184 00:09:41,440 --> 00:09:44,559 Speaker 4: nbfis what's the appropriate level of supervision and regulation that's 185 00:09:44,600 --> 00:09:45,600 Speaker 4: required over there? 186 00:09:45,840 --> 00:09:47,480 Speaker 5: All of that is going to be very important. 187 00:09:47,840 --> 00:09:50,840 Speaker 1: So you're leaving the IMF and you're going back to Harvard, 188 00:09:50,920 --> 00:09:54,160 Speaker 1: a university that you've known very well. What are you 189 00:09:54,240 --> 00:09:57,120 Speaker 1: going to be doing there and how important is it 190 00:09:57,320 --> 00:10:00,640 Speaker 1: for you to really get this sense back in the 191 00:10:00,679 --> 00:10:06,280 Speaker 1: economics profession of pure research and true rigor versus some 192 00:10:06,320 --> 00:10:08,320 Speaker 1: of the politicization that we've seen recently. 193 00:10:10,400 --> 00:10:14,720 Speaker 4: So I think the reason that the economics profession has 194 00:10:14,720 --> 00:10:17,120 Speaker 4: been able to contribute so well over these last few 195 00:10:17,200 --> 00:10:20,080 Speaker 4: years is because in the phase of unprecedented shocks, you 196 00:10:20,200 --> 00:10:22,360 Speaker 4: really need to go back to some of your training 197 00:10:22,360 --> 00:10:24,320 Speaker 4: to figure out how you're going to respond to a 198 00:10:24,360 --> 00:10:26,760 Speaker 4: pandemic that you haven't seen in one hundred years or 199 00:10:26,800 --> 00:10:30,200 Speaker 4: war in Europe, right, So having that base of knowledge 200 00:10:30,240 --> 00:10:31,840 Speaker 4: is very important. But at the same time, I think 201 00:10:31,840 --> 00:10:34,600 Speaker 4: the economics profession has to recognize that there is something 202 00:10:34,640 --> 00:10:39,520 Speaker 4: of a trust deficit, especially with mainstream economists, and how 203 00:10:39,520 --> 00:10:42,480 Speaker 4: do we get over that. There's broad consensus in the 204 00:10:42,520 --> 00:10:48,640 Speaker 4: economics profession that open trade, central bank independence super important. 205 00:10:48,679 --> 00:10:52,120 Speaker 4: Those are the crown jewels for good economic policy, and 206 00:10:52,240 --> 00:10:54,360 Speaker 4: yet the policy direction is away from that. 207 00:10:54,640 --> 00:10:56,760 Speaker 5: So I think there is absolutely. 208 00:10:56,240 --> 00:10:59,240 Speaker 4: Some bit of soul searching, some bit of stepping back 209 00:10:59,240 --> 00:11:01,880 Speaker 4: and asking yourself, how do you solve this trust episode? 210 00:11:02,320 --> 00:11:04,120 Speaker 4: How do you make sure this in this new world 211 00:11:04,120 --> 00:11:06,600 Speaker 4: of communication, that the good ideas still come through? 212 00:11:06,880 --> 00:11:07,160 Speaker 3: GETA. 213 00:11:07,240 --> 00:11:09,440 Speaker 2: You've always been generous with your time. We appreciate it 214 00:11:09,440 --> 00:11:11,040 Speaker 2: and we wish you the best of luck. Thanks for 215 00:11:11,120 --> 00:11:12,440 Speaker 2: sharing your time with us this morning. 216 00:11:12,480 --> 00:11:15,040 Speaker 3: Thank you. Good to go open at the IMF