WEBVTT - 03/05/21 DPS Best Of

0:00:00.760 --> 0:00:03.600
<v Speaker 1>You are listening to the Dan Patrick Show on Fox

0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:08.280
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio. We were curious the number of NFL playoff

0:00:08.320 --> 0:00:12.760
<v Speaker 1>games that have gone into overtime. Since nineteen eighty seven,

0:00:13.520 --> 0:00:16.680
<v Speaker 1>point three percent of playoff games have gone into overtime.

0:00:18.760 --> 0:00:23.880
<v Speaker 1>We are proposing no overtime, no overtime during the regular season.

0:00:24.280 --> 0:00:27.000
<v Speaker 1>We'll see if Florio will write up a little blurb

0:00:27.080 --> 0:00:30.680
<v Speaker 1>on us that the Dan Patrick Show is suggesting no overtime,

0:00:30.760 --> 0:00:33.920
<v Speaker 1>no overtime. We'll find out what the strategy would look

0:00:33.920 --> 0:00:37.519
<v Speaker 1>like with these teams. If there's no overtime there and

0:00:37.560 --> 0:00:41.040
<v Speaker 1>then the postseason we could have overtime. I didn't realize

0:00:41.080 --> 0:00:44.960
<v Speaker 1>that these things were on the docket, just proposals. Here

0:00:45.240 --> 0:00:48.320
<v Speaker 1>roughing the passer, it feels like they always trying to

0:00:48.400 --> 0:00:51.040
<v Speaker 1>sneak sneak it by the goalie here. I don't know.

0:00:51.240 --> 0:00:53.640
<v Speaker 1>At the owner's meeting, like nobody's looking, they go, oh,

0:00:53.720 --> 0:00:57.520
<v Speaker 1>everybody's out, let's vote all in favor, and it passes

0:00:58.080 --> 0:01:01.600
<v Speaker 1>spring in Mike Florio Pro Football Talk Live co host Mike,

0:01:01.720 --> 0:01:04.880
<v Speaker 1>we are proposing no overtime during the regular season. What

0:01:04.880 --> 0:01:09.080
<v Speaker 1>do you think old school pre nineteen seventy four, that's

0:01:09.120 --> 0:01:11.440
<v Speaker 1>how it used to be ties. Do you like ties?

0:01:11.560 --> 0:01:15.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't like ties, and I guess it's on the

0:01:15.000 --> 0:01:17.440
<v Speaker 1>two teams involved to make sure there isn't a tie.

0:01:17.440 --> 0:01:19.560
<v Speaker 1>And with so much more scoring now and the two

0:01:19.600 --> 0:01:23.080
<v Speaker 1>point conversion, it's easier to avoid a tie than it

0:01:23.120 --> 0:01:25.480
<v Speaker 1>would have been back in the early seventies and prior

0:01:25.520 --> 0:01:29.160
<v Speaker 1>to that. And Dan, you're onto something in this respect.

0:01:29.920 --> 0:01:33.320
<v Speaker 1>I believe that this push to go back to true

0:01:33.360 --> 0:01:36.600
<v Speaker 1>sudden death overtime with this spot and choose concept, which

0:01:36.640 --> 0:01:40.039
<v Speaker 1>I actually am intrigued by. Okay, explain that though, Mike, Okay,

0:01:40.360 --> 0:01:47.120
<v Speaker 1>so this is just proposed a new overtime possibility, a

0:01:47.160 --> 0:01:51.080
<v Speaker 1>new overtime possibility proposed by the Ravens. There's two types.

0:01:51.240 --> 0:01:53.760
<v Speaker 1>There's a sudden death and there's a straight seven and

0:01:53.760 --> 0:01:56.480
<v Speaker 1>a half minutes. I'm told Bill Belichick prefers that seven

0:01:56.520 --> 0:01:59.000
<v Speaker 1>and a half minutes of football. Whatever the score is

0:01:59.040 --> 0:02:01.640
<v Speaker 1>at the end, that's the fun score, win, lose, or draw.

0:02:02.160 --> 0:02:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Spot and choose means, in lieu of a coin flip,

0:02:05.560 --> 0:02:09.919
<v Speaker 1>to determine first possession, one team picks where the first

0:02:10.000 --> 0:02:14.280
<v Speaker 1>drive begins, for example, our own twenty yard line, the

0:02:14.880 --> 0:02:17.760
<v Speaker 1>minus twenty, as the football people call it, Your own

0:02:17.800 --> 0:02:21.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty yard line. One team picks the spot, and the

0:02:21.560 --> 0:02:25.240
<v Speaker 1>other team says whether they're going to take the ball

0:02:25.400 --> 0:02:28.119
<v Speaker 1>and play offense or give the other team the ball

0:02:28.160 --> 0:02:31.120
<v Speaker 1>and play defense. It's as equitable as it can be.

0:02:31.320 --> 0:02:33.120
<v Speaker 1>It's as fair as it can be. It reminds me

0:02:33.120 --> 0:02:35.400
<v Speaker 1>of the old Sesame Street sketch where you know, you

0:02:35.520 --> 0:02:37.760
<v Speaker 1>share a cookie by one person breaks it in half

0:02:37.760 --> 0:02:40.720
<v Speaker 1>and the other one chooses which half they want. Totally fair,

0:02:41.400 --> 0:02:43.600
<v Speaker 1>and I think it adds layers and levels of strategy

0:02:44.240 --> 0:02:49.200
<v Speaker 1>that will probably drive coaches and analytics departments crazy, But

0:02:49.280 --> 0:02:51.359
<v Speaker 1>it's so much better if you're going to go back

0:02:51.360 --> 0:02:53.800
<v Speaker 1>to true sudden death, it's so much better than the

0:02:53.840 --> 0:02:56.000
<v Speaker 1>coin flip. Now, the two ways the Ravens are proposing

0:02:56.000 --> 0:02:59.040
<v Speaker 1>it sudden death with up to ten minutes or this

0:02:59.200 --> 0:03:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Belichick preferred seven and a half minutes, play that full amount,

0:03:05.400 --> 0:03:08.080
<v Speaker 1>and whoever's ahead at the end wins, which which creates

0:03:08.080 --> 0:03:12.720
<v Speaker 1>I think an additional strategic angle. If you've only got

0:03:12.800 --> 0:03:15.760
<v Speaker 1>seven and a half minutes, you want to make sure

0:03:15.840 --> 0:03:18.240
<v Speaker 1>that you have enough time to do something with the

0:03:18.280 --> 0:03:22.400
<v Speaker 1>ball when you get it back. So it's just layers

0:03:22.400 --> 0:03:26.840
<v Speaker 1>and levels of strategy that I think would drive coaches crazy,

0:03:26.919 --> 0:03:29.000
<v Speaker 1>but I think it would be fair to both teams.

0:03:29.160 --> 0:03:32.840
<v Speaker 1>Could I have you start on the one yard line? Well,

0:03:33.080 --> 0:03:35.560
<v Speaker 1>you could pick the one yard line, but then then

0:03:35.600 --> 0:03:38.120
<v Speaker 1>the other team gets to choose whether it be offense

0:03:38.200 --> 0:03:41.080
<v Speaker 1>or defense. That's the beauty of it. Okay, okay. And

0:03:41.440 --> 0:03:43.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm told Dan that the analytics people are viewing the

0:03:44.080 --> 0:03:47.560
<v Speaker 1>thirteen the minus thirteen as the break even point. That

0:03:47.960 --> 0:03:51.280
<v Speaker 1>if the team that picks the yard position says twelve

0:03:51.640 --> 0:03:55.080
<v Speaker 1>or less, then that's when you're likely to choose to

0:03:55.120 --> 0:03:58.680
<v Speaker 1>play defense. Fourteen or more, you're likely to choose offense

0:03:58.840 --> 0:04:02.040
<v Speaker 1>in the standard case. Think about it, your quarterback, how

0:04:02.080 --> 0:04:04.400
<v Speaker 1>you feel about your defense, how you feel about whatever

0:04:04.400 --> 0:04:07.120
<v Speaker 1>players you have left in your game plan for the day,

0:04:07.120 --> 0:04:08.760
<v Speaker 1>how do you feel about your kicker, what the weather

0:04:08.760 --> 0:04:10.560
<v Speaker 1>conditions are. So many things are going to go into

0:04:10.600 --> 0:04:12.840
<v Speaker 1>that decision. Are they voting on this? I know it's

0:04:12.840 --> 0:04:16.480
<v Speaker 1>just a proposal. Does it get put up for vote? Well,

0:04:16.600 --> 0:04:19.080
<v Speaker 1>they're presenting it to the competition committee to try to

0:04:19.080 --> 0:04:21.680
<v Speaker 1>get them on board with it. It has more heft,

0:04:22.000 --> 0:04:25.640
<v Speaker 1>has more weight if the competition committee is behind it.

0:04:25.680 --> 0:04:29.920
<v Speaker 1>But the most important person to have behind it is

0:04:29.960 --> 0:04:34.320
<v Speaker 1>the commissioner. And my understanding is the commissioner likes it

0:04:34.520 --> 0:04:37.880
<v Speaker 1>because number one, it makes the game shorter. And this

0:04:37.920 --> 0:04:40.120
<v Speaker 1>gets back to the point you're making with no overtime.

0:04:40.200 --> 0:04:42.280
<v Speaker 1>I think they want the games to be shorter. Dan

0:04:42.400 --> 0:04:45.360
<v Speaker 1>not for this year, but I think it's some year

0:04:45.760 --> 0:04:49.560
<v Speaker 1>down the road, four or five, six, whenever. They're gonna

0:04:49.680 --> 0:04:54.760
<v Speaker 1>start dropping games into more standalone windows. And this Tuesday

0:04:54.880 --> 0:04:57.120
<v Speaker 1>night football that we saw a couple of times this year,

0:04:57.279 --> 0:05:00.760
<v Speaker 1>Wednesday afternoon at three o'clock, they're gonna get creative about

0:05:00.839 --> 0:05:05.919
<v Speaker 1>having more standalone games because is gambling proliferates, and as

0:05:06.760 --> 0:05:10.560
<v Speaker 1>real time in game betting becomes technologically available where you

0:05:10.560 --> 0:05:13.000
<v Speaker 1>can sit at home with your phone and what you

0:05:13.040 --> 0:05:16.599
<v Speaker 1>see at the stadium is what's coming into your home

0:05:16.640 --> 0:05:20.160
<v Speaker 1>at that moment, so there's no latency, it makes more

0:05:20.160 --> 0:05:23.920
<v Speaker 1>sense to have not nine games being played at once,

0:05:24.320 --> 0:05:27.440
<v Speaker 1>as many games as possible that are the only game

0:05:27.440 --> 0:05:32.200
<v Speaker 1>where everyone's watching, everyone's engaged, and everyone's betting one play

0:05:32.200 --> 0:05:34.120
<v Speaker 1>at a time on those games. So you make the

0:05:34.160 --> 0:05:36.320
<v Speaker 1>game shorter. Here's why you make the game shorter, because

0:05:36.320 --> 0:05:38.120
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna have teams that are playing on a five

0:05:38.200 --> 0:05:41.039
<v Speaker 1>day break, four day break six day break. You can't

0:05:41.080 --> 0:05:43.400
<v Speaker 1>be playing for seventy minutes. So I think that's why

0:05:43.440 --> 0:05:45.080
<v Speaker 1>they want to make the game shorter. So your idea

0:05:45.160 --> 0:05:47.840
<v Speaker 1>from that perspective is brilliant, thank you, because every game

0:05:47.920 --> 0:05:50.640
<v Speaker 1>is captain sixty minutes. Could you propose that I don't,

0:05:50.720 --> 0:05:54.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't have the commissioners here. Could you think I do? Oh,

0:05:54.240 --> 0:06:00.560
<v Speaker 1>you don't either? No, no, but but but but I'm

0:06:00.600 --> 0:06:02.760
<v Speaker 1>sure he would not turn up his nose at a

0:06:02.760 --> 0:06:05.919
<v Speaker 1>good idea. I just think that that the idea of

0:06:05.920 --> 0:06:08.280
<v Speaker 1>going back to tie, did we just have to we'd

0:06:08.320 --> 0:06:13.680
<v Speaker 1>have to accept ties. But the strategy of a tie

0:06:13.760 --> 0:06:17.880
<v Speaker 1>in the fourth quarter, I can imagine that. Now it

0:06:18.000 --> 0:06:20.840
<v Speaker 1>changes your philosophy of what you're doing. Instead of how

0:06:20.839 --> 0:06:23.600
<v Speaker 1>many times, well, they're playing for overtime, Now you can't

0:06:23.600 --> 0:06:26.800
<v Speaker 1>play for overtime. Nobody's taken a knee. Now you actually

0:06:26.960 --> 0:06:29.800
<v Speaker 1>are saying, are we comfortable with a tie against this team,

0:06:30.040 --> 0:06:32.200
<v Speaker 1>or do we want to go for a win or

0:06:32.240 --> 0:06:34.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, go for one versus go for two. That

0:06:35.880 --> 0:06:40.520
<v Speaker 1>when when overtime was the rule pre seventy four, you

0:06:40.680 --> 0:06:43.480
<v Speaker 1>didn't have that option. That that see, that's the beauty

0:06:43.480 --> 0:06:44.880
<v Speaker 1>of it, I think, and then here's where I think

0:06:44.880 --> 0:06:50.239
<v Speaker 1>they're onto something. The way the game is today, I

0:06:50.279 --> 0:06:55.719
<v Speaker 1>think that there would be fewer ties and that and that,

0:06:56.200 --> 0:06:59.000
<v Speaker 1>with all the analytics and the and the strategy and

0:06:59.080 --> 0:07:01.719
<v Speaker 1>going for two and all the different things you can do.

0:07:02.200 --> 0:07:04.640
<v Speaker 1>I just think that you would see less just kind

0:07:04.680 --> 0:07:06.520
<v Speaker 1>of shrugging. I think they just used to shrug at

0:07:06.560 --> 0:07:08.600
<v Speaker 1>a tie. Yeah, it's a tie, Okay, we'll get them

0:07:08.640 --> 0:07:11.160
<v Speaker 1>next week. I think it would be far different if

0:07:11.160 --> 0:07:13.280
<v Speaker 1>that were the case. Now, all right, a couple of things.

0:07:13.320 --> 0:07:15.920
<v Speaker 1>I know we're short on time. The roughing the passer

0:07:16.800 --> 0:07:22.440
<v Speaker 1>reviewable that's being proposed correct, Yes, and I don't like it.

0:07:22.440 --> 0:07:24.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't like it one bit. The reason I don't

0:07:24.080 --> 0:07:27.600
<v Speaker 1>like it is twenty nineteen pass interference replay review calls

0:07:27.600 --> 0:07:31.680
<v Speaker 1>and non calls, the standard kept changing. You can watch

0:07:31.840 --> 0:07:35.080
<v Speaker 1>the available angles and you can see a glancing blow

0:07:35.120 --> 0:07:38.040
<v Speaker 1>and if it's framed by frame, is that forcible contact

0:07:38.080 --> 0:07:40.000
<v Speaker 1>with the head of the quarterback? I don't like it.

0:07:40.000 --> 0:07:42.520
<v Speaker 1>And think about it, Dan, every interception, what's going to

0:07:42.600 --> 0:07:44.600
<v Speaker 1>be part of the replay review? Hey, was there contact

0:07:44.640 --> 0:07:48.360
<v Speaker 1>with the quarterback? Was it possibly roughing the passer? I

0:07:48.440 --> 0:07:52.320
<v Speaker 1>like the concept, but I don't like the execution that

0:07:52.440 --> 0:07:55.160
<v Speaker 1>it likely would entail because we saw it two years

0:07:55.160 --> 0:07:58.040
<v Speaker 1>ago and what a disaster pass interference was. I continue

0:07:58.040 --> 0:07:59.640
<v Speaker 1>to be a believer, and the Ravens are proposing this

0:07:59.680 --> 0:08:03.600
<v Speaker 1>as well. The booth umpire, the extra member of the

0:08:03.640 --> 0:08:06.800
<v Speaker 1>crew who sees what we see at home and can

0:08:06.840 --> 0:08:10.600
<v Speaker 1>talk directly to the referee and say, drop a flag.

0:08:10.720 --> 0:08:12.560
<v Speaker 1>Pick up a flag. You guys are making a mistake,

0:08:12.600 --> 0:08:14.560
<v Speaker 1>no different than another member of the crew who runs

0:08:14.640 --> 0:08:16.680
<v Speaker 1>up and talks to the referee and they pick up

0:08:16.720 --> 0:08:20.320
<v Speaker 1>a flag. That's what they need, and they've been reluctant

0:08:20.320 --> 0:08:23.160
<v Speaker 1>to do it, but I think that's the key, because

0:08:23.520 --> 0:08:25.280
<v Speaker 1>what you see when you're on the field and what

0:08:25.360 --> 0:08:27.760
<v Speaker 1>you see at home are two very different things. They

0:08:27.800 --> 0:08:30.600
<v Speaker 1>need a referee, an official who sees what we see

0:08:30.640 --> 0:08:33.000
<v Speaker 1>at home and can talk to the people on the field.

0:08:33.360 --> 0:08:35.920
<v Speaker 1>Mike Florio Pro Football Talk Live co host, of course,

0:08:36.080 --> 0:08:38.760
<v Speaker 1>is a website Pro football Talk dot Com. The fumbling

0:08:38.760 --> 0:08:42.000
<v Speaker 1>the ball out of the end zone. Clark Hunt, the

0:08:42.040 --> 0:08:44.720
<v Speaker 1>owner of the Chiefs, the team that benefited from that

0:08:44.800 --> 0:08:47.480
<v Speaker 1>rule in the Division around of the playoffs, suggested before

0:08:47.480 --> 0:08:50.559
<v Speaker 1>the Super Bowl that that rule would be looked at

0:08:50.600 --> 0:08:54.680
<v Speaker 1>by the Competition Committee. There's no proposal yet on that rule,

0:08:55.000 --> 0:08:57.640
<v Speaker 1>and Dan, I just don't think they're going to change it.

0:08:57.640 --> 0:09:00.000
<v Speaker 1>It's always been there. You know. Once upon a time

0:09:00.240 --> 0:09:03.040
<v Speaker 1>the rule was if you threw an incomplete pass into

0:09:03.080 --> 0:09:05.960
<v Speaker 1>the end zone and it hit the turf, it was

0:09:06.000 --> 0:09:08.199
<v Speaker 1>a touchback and the defense got the ball at its

0:09:08.200 --> 0:09:11.960
<v Speaker 1>own twenty. There's just been this sacred treatment of the

0:09:12.080 --> 0:09:14.400
<v Speaker 1>end zone and that's where this comes from. As unfair

0:09:14.440 --> 0:09:17.080
<v Speaker 1>as it is, here's the reality. It's fair in that

0:09:17.720 --> 0:09:21.079
<v Speaker 1>it affects both teams equally, and you know, it may

0:09:21.240 --> 0:09:23.800
<v Speaker 1>screw you in one game and you may benefit from

0:09:23.840 --> 0:09:25.560
<v Speaker 1>it another game. The thing I don't like about it though,

0:09:25.880 --> 0:09:29.320
<v Speaker 1>it penalizes effort. And you see a guy making maximum

0:09:29.320 --> 0:09:31.680
<v Speaker 1>effort to reach the ball out to the pylon, and

0:09:31.720 --> 0:09:33.520
<v Speaker 1>if the ball slips out of his hands and just

0:09:33.640 --> 0:09:36.679
<v Speaker 1>goes out of the end zone one inchin, you lose

0:09:36.679 --> 0:09:38.760
<v Speaker 1>the ball. If it goes out short of the end zone,

0:09:38.760 --> 0:09:40.600
<v Speaker 1>buy an inch, you keep the ball. If it hits

0:09:40.600 --> 0:09:42.680
<v Speaker 1>that pylon, you lose the ball. That's what I don't

0:09:42.720 --> 0:09:49.880
<v Speaker 1>like about. How about we extend the end zone like CFL. Yeah,

0:09:49.000 --> 0:09:53.840
<v Speaker 1>that would that would make well, you know, you have

0:09:53.880 --> 0:09:55.400
<v Speaker 1>to do. You have to go back and rebuild half

0:09:55.440 --> 0:09:57.680
<v Speaker 1>the stadium, wouldn't you. Yeah, that would be the problem.

0:09:57.720 --> 0:09:59.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm all in. I'm going with that too, like that

0:10:00.200 --> 0:10:04.840
<v Speaker 1>the economy get create some jobs there, anything new, let me.

0:10:05.160 --> 0:10:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Roethlisberger resigning it felt like he had to fall on

0:10:08.280 --> 0:10:10.839
<v Speaker 1>his own sword. Do take less to stay there? But

0:10:12.200 --> 0:10:15.720
<v Speaker 1>your thoughts when Roethlisberger announced he was coming back general

0:10:15.760 --> 0:10:18.760
<v Speaker 1>business advice for anyone out there who's ever negotiating a

0:10:18.880 --> 0:10:23.760
<v Speaker 1>salary with his or her employer. Once you say I

0:10:23.840 --> 0:10:27.280
<v Speaker 1>don't care how much I pad this year, you can't

0:10:27.320 --> 0:10:30.520
<v Speaker 1>take that back Dan. And once he said that he's

0:10:30.559 --> 0:10:32.840
<v Speaker 1>not getting nineteen million this year, the question is what's

0:10:32.840 --> 0:10:34.480
<v Speaker 1>he getting? And that's why it took so long. If

0:10:34.480 --> 0:10:36.680
<v Speaker 1>he's getting nineteen million this year, it's a half hour

0:10:36.760 --> 0:10:39.040
<v Speaker 1>negotiation to figure out how they're going to move the

0:10:39.080 --> 0:10:41.640
<v Speaker 1>money around and reduce his cap number. Once he said

0:10:41.679 --> 0:10:44.880
<v Speaker 1>that he's getting squeezed, and I'm surprised he only got

0:10:44.880 --> 0:10:47.200
<v Speaker 1>squeezed for five million dollars, so it gives him some

0:10:47.280 --> 0:10:51.760
<v Speaker 1>cap space. I just I think they're delusional in thinking

0:10:51.800 --> 0:10:54.400
<v Speaker 1>that they've got a championship team. This isn't two thousand

0:10:54.400 --> 0:10:56.920
<v Speaker 1>and five, Jerome bettis, let's come back for one more

0:10:57.000 --> 0:10:59.520
<v Speaker 1>run and go win a super Bowl. There are some

0:10:59.600 --> 0:11:01.760
<v Speaker 1>great teams in the AFC, and yeah they were eleven

0:11:01.800 --> 0:11:04.319
<v Speaker 1>another last year. Eight of those games could have gone

0:11:04.360 --> 0:11:08.760
<v Speaker 1>either way. I also wondered about Deshaun Watson, the timing

0:11:08.760 --> 0:11:11.480
<v Speaker 1>of when, if you're going to trade him, when do

0:11:11.559 --> 0:11:14.160
<v Speaker 1>you trade him? And I thought, you know, I just

0:11:14.280 --> 0:11:16.320
<v Speaker 1>have a four sales sign or you know, like a

0:11:16.400 --> 0:11:18.080
<v Speaker 1>yard sale and you say, come on in, give me

0:11:18.120 --> 0:11:21.240
<v Speaker 1>your offers like Detroit did. But I'm wondering, is he

0:11:21.320 --> 0:11:24.160
<v Speaker 1>more likely to get traded closer to the draft. Does

0:11:24.160 --> 0:11:28.160
<v Speaker 1>that make more sense? But I don't even know if

0:11:28.160 --> 0:11:30.600
<v Speaker 1>we're there yet. But what do you think about if

0:11:30.600 --> 0:11:33.920
<v Speaker 1>he is traded, what the timing would be for that? Dan,

0:11:34.000 --> 0:11:36.200
<v Speaker 1>I think with all these teams that are looking for

0:11:36.280 --> 0:11:41.280
<v Speaker 1>quarterbacks evaluating their options, the problem is if you wait

0:11:41.400 --> 0:11:45.160
<v Speaker 1>until the draft to trade Deshaun Watson, there are teams

0:11:45.200 --> 0:11:49.480
<v Speaker 1>that will have made other plans at quarterback and then

0:11:49.520 --> 0:11:51.720
<v Speaker 1>they're not at the table, and that could be a

0:11:51.720 --> 0:11:55.440
<v Speaker 1>team that helps drive another team up to a higher price.

0:11:55.640 --> 0:11:58.679
<v Speaker 1>You know. John McClean and the Houston Chronicle echoed something

0:11:58.720 --> 0:12:00.560
<v Speaker 1>that we had said a few weeks ago they should

0:12:00.600 --> 0:12:02.360
<v Speaker 1>get the Jets and the Dolphins in a bidding war.

0:12:02.559 --> 0:12:05.719
<v Speaker 1>Do it now, and hey, if you don't trade for him,

0:12:05.880 --> 0:12:07.760
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna have to deal with him twice per year

0:12:08.080 --> 0:12:11.400
<v Speaker 1>and play them against each other. You know, Russell Wilson's

0:12:11.440 --> 0:12:14.680
<v Speaker 1>agent very artfully got it out there the four teams

0:12:14.679 --> 0:12:17.040
<v Speaker 1>that he'd be willing to accept a trade too. At

0:12:17.080 --> 0:12:20.000
<v Speaker 1>some point, the Texans need to find out where are

0:12:20.000 --> 0:12:23.800
<v Speaker 1>the places Deshaun Watson would play. Let's get those teams

0:12:24.120 --> 0:12:26.400
<v Speaker 1>at the table and let but the first they have

0:12:26.440 --> 0:12:27.920
<v Speaker 1>to come to the conclusion that they're even going to

0:12:28.000 --> 0:12:29.840
<v Speaker 1>do it. I feel like at this point they are

0:12:29.880 --> 0:12:33.080
<v Speaker 1>in the I don't know, anger denial, bargaining, depression, acceptance.

0:12:33.080 --> 0:12:36.720
<v Speaker 1>They're probably still in the denial phase, and they just refuse,

0:12:37.360 --> 0:12:39.440
<v Speaker 1>they refuse to accept the fact that this guy is

0:12:39.480 --> 0:12:41.080
<v Speaker 1>never going to play for them again. And Dan, have

0:12:41.160 --> 0:12:45.400
<v Speaker 1>you seen or heard anything that contradicts the prevailing notion

0:12:45.640 --> 0:12:49.480
<v Speaker 1>that he's never putting that blue helmet on his head again? No?

0:12:50.280 --> 0:12:53.160
<v Speaker 1>And that's why I didn't understand why they just didn't say,

0:12:53.200 --> 0:12:56.480
<v Speaker 1>come on, in compete against each other and hopefully we'll

0:12:56.480 --> 0:12:59.760
<v Speaker 1>get an even bigger treasure trove here the Russell will

0:13:00.120 --> 0:13:01.719
<v Speaker 1>That doesn't feel like there's any real news on the

0:13:01.760 --> 0:13:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Russell Wilson front. We're trying to make news, you know.

0:13:05.800 --> 0:13:09.760
<v Speaker 1>I guess his agent said or somebody said, this is

0:13:09.960 --> 0:13:12.480
<v Speaker 1>the reason why he likes the Bears. That doesn't mean

0:13:12.520 --> 0:13:14.960
<v Speaker 1>he's getting traded because he likes Matt Naggie in the

0:13:15.000 --> 0:13:20.360
<v Speaker 1>offensive line here. But I haven't heard anything more internally

0:13:20.400 --> 0:13:23.960
<v Speaker 1>about this situation. So did Russ accomplish what he wanted

0:13:24.000 --> 0:13:26.720
<v Speaker 1>to accomplish when he came on our show? Well, well,

0:13:27.200 --> 0:13:29.760
<v Speaker 1>and let's think about the timeline. The stuff he said

0:13:29.800 --> 0:13:33.400
<v Speaker 1>on your show was jar and I've never heard a

0:13:33.480 --> 0:13:36.320
<v Speaker 1>quarterback talk that candidly about his situation. I think Tom

0:13:36.360 --> 0:13:38.959
<v Speaker 1>Brady's to blame or credit for all of that, because

0:13:38.960 --> 0:13:41.080
<v Speaker 1>these guys see what happened with Brady. They want to

0:13:41.080 --> 0:13:43.400
<v Speaker 1>flex their muscles. That was great, but then it got

0:13:43.480 --> 0:13:45.760
<v Speaker 1>quiet for a couple of weeks, so you kind of

0:13:45.800 --> 0:13:48.360
<v Speaker 1>start thinking, well, maybe they've worked things out. Well, then

0:13:48.440 --> 0:13:52.320
<v Speaker 1>comes the Athletic article that pulls some scabs off of

0:13:52.360 --> 0:13:55.640
<v Speaker 1>the situation. Mark Rogers says what he says on the record,

0:13:55.720 --> 0:13:58.520
<v Speaker 1>which was as jarring as the comments Russell Wilson made,

0:13:58.679 --> 0:14:02.040
<v Speaker 1>and now it's quiet again. Just because it's quiet doesn't

0:14:02.080 --> 0:14:06.719
<v Speaker 1>mean nothing's happening. I mean Seahawks have to be considering

0:14:06.880 --> 0:14:11.920
<v Speaker 1>their options. And the four teams are identified by Rogers, Raiders, Bears, Saints, Cowboys.

0:14:11.960 --> 0:14:14.599
<v Speaker 1>How do you not, at a minimum, get all the

0:14:15.080 --> 0:14:19.280
<v Speaker 1>decision makers together and say what would we be willing

0:14:19.320 --> 0:14:21.360
<v Speaker 1>to do here? And I've said this about the Saints

0:14:21.440 --> 0:14:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Dan when you look at the cap mess that they're

0:14:23.800 --> 0:14:25.680
<v Speaker 1>in and the guys that they're going to have to

0:14:25.720 --> 0:14:28.120
<v Speaker 1>part ways with, how do you not call the Seahawks

0:14:28.120 --> 0:14:30.640
<v Speaker 1>and say, just tell us who you want, because there's

0:14:30.640 --> 0:14:33.120
<v Speaker 1>a chance they want some guys that you're going to

0:14:33.200 --> 0:14:36.040
<v Speaker 1>cut anyway, or maybe they want a guy that you're

0:14:36.040 --> 0:14:38.760
<v Speaker 1>on the fence about so you can trade him and

0:14:38.920 --> 0:14:40.880
<v Speaker 1>keep one of the guys that you're thinking about cutting.

0:14:40.960 --> 0:14:44.560
<v Speaker 1>So I just think that Russell Wilson is good enough

0:14:44.600 --> 0:14:46.920
<v Speaker 1>that those four teams need to at least at least

0:14:46.960 --> 0:14:49.000
<v Speaker 1>explore it, even if it means calling up the Seahawks

0:14:49.000 --> 0:14:50.960
<v Speaker 1>and saying, tell us what you want and we'll see

0:14:50.960 --> 0:14:52.960
<v Speaker 1>if we can come close to because Russ can't have

0:14:53.040 --> 0:14:56.120
<v Speaker 1>his feelings hurt if you reach out to the Saints,

0:14:56.120 --> 0:15:00.120
<v Speaker 1>whereas Deshaun Watson, you know, maybe that's different or some

0:15:00.160 --> 0:15:02.640
<v Speaker 1>of these other teams where they reach out and you go,

0:15:02.680 --> 0:15:05.120
<v Speaker 1>oh gosh, don't let him find out that you reach down.

0:15:05.560 --> 0:15:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Russell's people will probably go, Okay, you have to do

0:15:08.920 --> 0:15:11.560
<v Speaker 1>your due diligence. If I'm Seattle, I just find out.

0:15:12.160 --> 0:15:16.480
<v Speaker 1>I just want to know. If it gets worse, then

0:15:16.600 --> 0:15:18.600
<v Speaker 1>at least I know. Hey, you know what the Saints

0:15:18.600 --> 0:15:20.600
<v Speaker 1>will give us this? Hey, you know what the Bears

0:15:20.640 --> 0:15:23.440
<v Speaker 1>will give us is this. Put those two. Pick those

0:15:23.440 --> 0:15:25.560
<v Speaker 1>two against each other, and let's see what we have here.

0:15:26.040 --> 0:15:27.760
<v Speaker 1>Here's what it comes down to. And this was my

0:15:27.840 --> 0:15:32.320
<v Speaker 1>takeaway after reading the item in The Athletic. Russell Wilson

0:15:32.400 --> 0:15:34.480
<v Speaker 1>views himself as Patrick Mahomes, and he has every right

0:15:34.520 --> 0:15:37.400
<v Speaker 1>to view that. We haven't seen him in a situation

0:15:37.400 --> 0:15:39.960
<v Speaker 1>where he is of Patrick Mahomes, where the offense runs

0:15:39.960 --> 0:15:42.280
<v Speaker 1>through him and it's orchestrated to get the most out

0:15:42.280 --> 0:15:46.080
<v Speaker 1>of his abilities. That's what he wants. If the Seahawks

0:15:46.160 --> 0:15:50.360
<v Speaker 1>don't view Russell Wilson the way Russell Wilson views Russell Wilson,

0:15:50.400 --> 0:15:53.680
<v Speaker 1>then trade him to a team that does because necessarily,

0:15:53.880 --> 0:15:57.360
<v Speaker 1>whatever that team offers will reflect what they think of

0:15:57.440 --> 0:16:00.280
<v Speaker 1>Russell Wilson and the Seahawks will look at it and say,

0:15:59.800 --> 0:16:03.880
<v Speaker 1>these bastards are crazy. Why are they offering this for

0:16:03.880 --> 0:16:06.240
<v Speaker 1>this guy. Let's take it and low take it and run.

0:16:07.160 --> 0:16:09.280
<v Speaker 1>Have a great way, Ken Mike, always great to talk

0:16:09.320 --> 0:16:11.800
<v Speaker 1>to you, buddy. Thank you, Thanks Dan se Mike Florio,

0:16:11.880 --> 0:16:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Pro Football Talk. Thanks for listening to The Dan Patrick

0:16:14.640 --> 0:16:17.400
<v Speaker 1>Show podcast. Be sure to catch us live every weekday

0:16:17.400 --> 0:16:20.720
<v Speaker 1>morning nine to noon Eastern or six to nine Pacific

0:16:20.760 --> 0:16:23.400
<v Speaker 1>on Fox Sports Radio. Find your local station for The

0:16:23.480 --> 0:16:26.360
<v Speaker 1>Dan Patrick Show at Fox Sports Radio dot com, or

0:16:26.440 --> 0:16:29.600
<v Speaker 1>stream us live every day on the iHeartRadio app by

0:16:29.640 --> 0:16:33.400
<v Speaker 1>searching f s R, or stream us live on the

0:16:33.440 --> 0:16:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Peacock Act. Hey what's up everybody. It's me three time

0:16:37.120 --> 0:16:40.239
<v Speaker 1>pro bowler Le Barrington and I couldn't be more excited

0:16:40.240 --> 0:16:43.600
<v Speaker 1>to announce a new podcast called Up on Game? What

0:16:43.800 --> 0:16:46.400
<v Speaker 1>is Up on Game? You asked, along with my fellow

0:16:46.440 --> 0:16:50.680
<v Speaker 1>pro bowler t J. Hushman Zada and Super Bowl champion Yep,

0:16:50.840 --> 0:16:54.120
<v Speaker 1>that's right, Plexico Burris. You can only name a show

0:16:54.280 --> 0:16:56.920
<v Speaker 1>with that type of talent on it. Up on Game.

0:16:57.080 --> 0:17:00.160
<v Speaker 1>We're going to be sharing our real life experiences. Is

0:17:00.200 --> 0:17:04.040
<v Speaker 1>loaded with teachable moments. Listen to Up on Game with

0:17:04.359 --> 0:17:08.080
<v Speaker 1>me lebar Arrington, TJ. Hutchman's Out of and Plexico Birds

0:17:08.160 --> 0:17:13.280
<v Speaker 1>on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts or wherever you get

0:17:13.320 --> 0:17:19.760
<v Speaker 1>your podcast from. Bringing Tim mcmaan ESPN NBA staff writer

0:17:19.880 --> 0:17:23.879
<v Speaker 1>who joins us on the program. Do you think that

0:17:23.920 --> 0:17:29.280
<v Speaker 1>the Utah Jazz were singled out here by by Lebron

0:17:29.280 --> 0:17:32.159
<v Speaker 1>and company that they were the last two picks Rudy

0:17:32.160 --> 0:17:35.760
<v Speaker 1>Gobert and uh and Mitchell Donovan Mitchell? Yeah, I mean,

0:17:35.800 --> 0:17:38.919
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if Lebron and k D intentionally did this.

0:17:39.040 --> 0:17:41.399
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if they got together on plot of this,

0:17:41.560 --> 0:17:44.600
<v Speaker 1>But is it disrespect to the Jazz, to the team

0:17:44.600 --> 0:17:46.639
<v Speaker 1>that has the best record of the Namba. Will it

0:17:46.720 --> 0:17:51.479
<v Speaker 1>be perceived as disrespect in Utah? Yeah? Absolutely, there's no

0:17:51.600 --> 0:17:55.880
<v Speaker 1>question about it. And I really for Rudy Gobert, especially

0:17:55.920 --> 0:17:58.680
<v Speaker 1>he's obviously the guy who went dead last, so he's

0:17:58.720 --> 0:18:01.480
<v Speaker 1>the guy who felt like he had to wait an

0:18:01.480 --> 0:18:04.919
<v Speaker 1>extra couple of years just to get invited to the

0:18:05.000 --> 0:18:08.840
<v Speaker 1>All Star Game. And really, you know the video game stuff,

0:18:08.880 --> 0:18:10.520
<v Speaker 1>come on, you think was Lebron playing with the New

0:18:10.640 --> 0:18:13.439
<v Speaker 1>Orleans Pelicans growing up. I don't know, I don't know.

0:18:13.760 --> 0:18:15.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that he had too much experience playing

0:18:15.680 --> 0:18:19.280
<v Speaker 1>with the Pelicans growing up, But it kind of felt

0:18:19.880 --> 0:18:23.080
<v Speaker 1>like Lebron and KD again, whether it was intentionally or not,

0:18:23.400 --> 0:18:25.760
<v Speaker 1>we're basically saying, you might have the best record in

0:18:25.760 --> 0:18:28.760
<v Speaker 1>the league, but you really don't belong at the top

0:18:28.880 --> 0:18:33.119
<v Speaker 1>level of the NBA. Yeah, So, using Lebron's logic, if

0:18:33.200 --> 0:18:35.880
<v Speaker 1>Luca don Chick played in Utah, then he wouldn't take

0:18:36.000 --> 0:18:38.760
<v Speaker 1>him because Carl Malone and John Stockton played there, Right,

0:18:38.840 --> 0:18:42.520
<v Speaker 1>that's what he's telling me. Yeah, Black Bron Stockton to

0:18:42.600 --> 0:18:47.360
<v Speaker 1>Malone for sure. Yeah, I like this. I'm not big

0:18:47.400 --> 0:18:49.359
<v Speaker 1>on the All Star weekend, but if it's here and

0:18:49.359 --> 0:18:51.680
<v Speaker 1>they're willing to have some fun with this with the

0:18:51.720 --> 0:18:54.600
<v Speaker 1>slam dunk, so they're cramming the slam dunk contest in

0:18:54.680 --> 0:19:00.000
<v Speaker 1>at halftime, right, Yeah, and not the not the most

0:19:00.080 --> 0:19:02.760
<v Speaker 1>thrilling dunk contest field that I think we've ever seen,

0:19:02.840 --> 0:19:05.880
<v Speaker 1>but such as life and Alex Caruso of the Lakers

0:19:06.160 --> 0:19:12.800
<v Speaker 1>turned down the invitation. Yeah, when when a six foot

0:19:12.880 --> 0:19:16.840
<v Speaker 1>three white dude who's Balding's turning down dunk contest invitation.

0:19:17.720 --> 0:19:21.040
<v Speaker 1>It's it's, uh, you know, we've got some issues, and

0:19:21.160 --> 0:19:23.360
<v Speaker 1>you have the three point contest where you do have

0:19:23.400 --> 0:19:25.640
<v Speaker 1>some you know, you've got great shooters in there. So

0:19:25.680 --> 0:19:28.920
<v Speaker 1>that that and I like watching it, but a three

0:19:28.920 --> 0:19:31.639
<v Speaker 1>point contest has significantly more sizzled than the dunk content.

0:19:31.760 --> 0:19:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Let's be honest, we all wish Zion would have accepted

0:19:34.320 --> 0:19:36.800
<v Speaker 1>a dunk contest invitation. That's what we want to see,

0:19:36.800 --> 0:19:39.920
<v Speaker 1>and then you know, Topping might throw down some nice stuff.

0:19:39.960 --> 0:19:42.480
<v Speaker 1>We wanted to see Zion on that stage, and so

0:19:42.520 --> 0:19:45.000
<v Speaker 1>that's that's a bummer that he didn't take the invitation.

0:19:45.320 --> 0:19:49.440
<v Speaker 1>Caruso we can live without, although I might have been

0:19:49.480 --> 0:19:52.720
<v Speaker 1>interested in seeing Alex Caruso in the duncast. And then

0:19:53.160 --> 0:19:55.560
<v Speaker 1>the man can fly, and especially since you know he's

0:19:55.720 --> 0:19:58.720
<v Speaker 1>he's just kind of acknowledged that, you know, he's got

0:19:58.720 --> 0:20:01.520
<v Speaker 1>a little endorsement deal his knowledge like going full buzz,

0:20:01.520 --> 0:20:04.520
<v Speaker 1>he's all aerodynamic. Now he can really get up. I

0:20:04.560 --> 0:20:06.280
<v Speaker 1>had a couple of things here. I don't know who's

0:20:06.280 --> 0:20:08.680
<v Speaker 1>going to be traded here. It feels like Kyle Lowry's

0:20:08.720 --> 0:20:12.639
<v Speaker 1>available or sort of available. How available is Lowry? And

0:20:12.680 --> 0:20:15.520
<v Speaker 1>where do you see him landing well. And that's the

0:20:15.560 --> 0:20:18.200
<v Speaker 1>big question because at this point it does not look

0:20:18.200 --> 0:20:21.840
<v Speaker 1>like Brad Thibie will be available. So Kyle Lowry would

0:20:21.840 --> 0:20:25.879
<v Speaker 1>then become, you know, the most impactful player potentially on

0:20:25.920 --> 0:20:28.920
<v Speaker 1>the trade market. And you know, when when you look

0:20:28.960 --> 0:20:32.439
<v Speaker 1>at fits for him, the one that really stands out

0:20:32.560 --> 0:20:34.879
<v Speaker 1>is Philly, and not just because he's from there, not

0:20:35.040 --> 0:20:38.199
<v Speaker 1>because he's a Nova guy, although that's a nice little storyline,

0:20:38.600 --> 0:20:41.560
<v Speaker 1>but simply because of how he would fit with the

0:20:41.600 --> 0:20:44.919
<v Speaker 1>seventy six Ers, how he would fit giving a third

0:20:44.960 --> 0:20:47.080
<v Speaker 1>star to a team that obviously has Joel and b

0:20:47.280 --> 0:20:51.560
<v Speaker 1>playing at an MVP level. You know Ben Simmons, and

0:20:51.800 --> 0:20:55.960
<v Speaker 1>also you know Darryl Moorey is as aggressive as any

0:20:56.600 --> 0:20:58.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, personnel executive in the league in terms of

0:20:59.280 --> 0:21:02.800
<v Speaker 1>in season trades. He tried to make the Harden trade happen.

0:21:03.080 --> 0:21:06.080
<v Speaker 1>That didn't you know, Louy would not require to give

0:21:06.119 --> 0:21:08.640
<v Speaker 1>it up Ben Simmons, but I fully expect that Darryl

0:21:08.680 --> 0:21:11.639
<v Speaker 1>Moore will make an aggressive pitch because you know, the

0:21:11.680 --> 0:21:14.240
<v Speaker 1>seventy six Ers are one of these handful of teams

0:21:14.560 --> 0:21:17.520
<v Speaker 1>but obviously have a legitimate shot at winner championship this season.

0:21:18.000 --> 0:21:20.640
<v Speaker 1>NBA analyst Greg Anthony was on the show on Wednesday.

0:21:20.680 --> 0:21:23.160
<v Speaker 1>He disagreed with me, saying that this was a two

0:21:23.200 --> 0:21:26.200
<v Speaker 1>way street with the Rockets, they also quit on James

0:21:26.200 --> 0:21:28.280
<v Speaker 1>Harden and vice. First, I know you did a deep

0:21:28.320 --> 0:21:32.760
<v Speaker 1>dive on this, but separate fact from fiction here with

0:21:32.800 --> 0:21:35.160
<v Speaker 1>what went on. I said, I can't I couldn't vote

0:21:35.200 --> 0:21:37.119
<v Speaker 1>for Harden if I had to vote for MVP because

0:21:37.119 --> 0:21:39.640
<v Speaker 1>he quit on the Rockets. He showed up out of shape,

0:21:39.720 --> 0:21:41.760
<v Speaker 1>he did not want to be there, and this is

0:21:41.760 --> 0:21:44.680
<v Speaker 1>a team that he helped build and deconstruct, and now

0:21:44.720 --> 0:21:46.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to have him as MVP in the same season.

0:21:46.880 --> 0:21:49.080
<v Speaker 1>I can't. I can't see it happening. So what did

0:21:49.119 --> 0:21:52.280
<v Speaker 1>you find out with your deep dive? I mean, look,

0:21:52.320 --> 0:21:54.679
<v Speaker 1>I understand what you're saying, and obviously it was a

0:21:54.720 --> 0:21:58.520
<v Speaker 1>bad looked the way that he gave up on the Rockets.

0:21:58.560 --> 0:22:01.240
<v Speaker 1>But I also think if you haven't VP vote, you

0:22:01.359 --> 0:22:04.600
<v Speaker 1>have to just evaluate based on pure value and his

0:22:04.760 --> 0:22:07.960
<v Speaker 1>value to the Brooklyn Nets. I think you have to

0:22:08.040 --> 0:22:11.080
<v Speaker 1>include James Harden in that conversation. I wouldn't say that

0:22:11.119 --> 0:22:15.439
<v Speaker 1>the Rockets quit on Hardened. I think you can definitely, uh,

0:22:15.720 --> 0:22:17.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, take a look at some of the some

0:22:17.320 --> 0:22:19.080
<v Speaker 1>of the moves they made, some of the moves they

0:22:19.160 --> 0:22:22.000
<v Speaker 1>didn't make, you know, not go into the luxury tax

0:22:22.560 --> 0:22:25.000
<v Speaker 1>his last few years, and you can nip pick it,

0:22:25.080 --> 0:22:27.040
<v Speaker 1>but they were, you know, they were trying, like you know,

0:22:27.160 --> 0:22:29.640
<v Speaker 1>this summer, they were aggressive, trying to kind of remodel

0:22:29.640 --> 0:22:32.679
<v Speaker 1>the roster, getting Christian would hoping they could convince the mistake.

0:22:33.080 --> 0:22:35.120
<v Speaker 1>But obviously there was just no hope. But again, if

0:22:35.119 --> 0:22:38.680
<v Speaker 1>you talk about what really went wrong with the Rockets,

0:22:39.040 --> 0:22:42.280
<v Speaker 1>what was kind of the the move that that you know,

0:22:42.560 --> 0:22:46.560
<v Speaker 1>had this whole thing tumbling down. It was given up

0:22:46.640 --> 0:22:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Chris Paul and a whole bunch of picks for us

0:22:48.560 --> 0:22:51.720
<v Speaker 1>with Westbrook and James Harden not only was on board

0:22:51.760 --> 0:22:54.240
<v Speaker 1>with that, but he was pounding the table wanted it

0:22:54.280 --> 0:22:58.600
<v Speaker 1>to happen. Yeah, that's where I don't have any sympathy.

0:22:58.640 --> 0:23:01.960
<v Speaker 1>Not that hardens looking for, but you wanted these players,

0:23:02.000 --> 0:23:05.480
<v Speaker 1>you wanted to get rid of these players. And so

0:23:06.359 --> 0:23:10.120
<v Speaker 1>is he playing at an All Star MVPLA Absolutely yeah,

0:23:10.160 --> 0:23:13.600
<v Speaker 1>But that doesn't mean he should be the MVP. It

0:23:13.640 --> 0:23:16.280
<v Speaker 1>feels like, you know, earlier and earlier in the season,

0:23:16.359 --> 0:23:18.719
<v Speaker 1>we're looking at MVP candidates to him, and maybe this

0:23:18.800 --> 0:23:23.080
<v Speaker 1>is just sports talk radio. We need content with the NFL.

0:23:23.160 --> 0:23:26.359
<v Speaker 1>We start talking about the MVP usually after the first

0:23:26.400 --> 0:23:32.119
<v Speaker 1>month of the season, you know, trying to handicap this yo.

0:23:32.200 --> 0:23:34.880
<v Speaker 1>Kitch has been wonderful in Denver and beat has been

0:23:34.960 --> 0:23:38.160
<v Speaker 1>great hard and you can throw him in there, Lebron.

0:23:38.240 --> 0:23:41.199
<v Speaker 1>I know it's really important to him, But when it

0:23:41.240 --> 0:23:45.160
<v Speaker 1>comes down to the MVP, what is the This guy

0:23:45.280 --> 0:23:49.160
<v Speaker 1>has to have this to get my MVP vote. Yeah,

0:23:49.200 --> 0:23:51.720
<v Speaker 1>Damian Lillard's the guy you didn't mention you has to

0:23:51.760 --> 0:23:56.199
<v Speaker 1>be in that discussion. Look, this is all ridiculously premature,

0:23:56.680 --> 0:23:59.280
<v Speaker 1>but it's not. It's not media driven, it's player driven

0:23:59.280 --> 0:24:02.200
<v Speaker 1>as well. I mean Lebron started lobbying for this MVP

0:24:02.720 --> 0:24:04.680
<v Speaker 1>when he was still in the bubble complaining about last

0:24:04.760 --> 0:24:07.520
<v Speaker 1>year's boats. So don't blame the media on this one.

0:24:07.680 --> 0:24:10.720
<v Speaker 1>Oh no, we we get blamed for this, tim because

0:24:11.000 --> 0:24:13.240
<v Speaker 1>just because Lebron said it doesn't mean we have to

0:24:13.240 --> 0:24:15.800
<v Speaker 1>pick up the baton and keep running. Then look, look

0:24:15.880 --> 0:24:20.040
<v Speaker 1>we we okay, well we will give them the assist,

0:24:20.240 --> 0:24:22.840
<v Speaker 1>all right, at the minimum. But you know these guys

0:24:22.840 --> 0:24:26.800
<v Speaker 1>are lobbying themselves, so um right A couple of weeks ago,

0:24:26.840 --> 0:24:29.520
<v Speaker 1>I would have said Lebron Anthony Davis went out, Obviously

0:24:29.520 --> 0:24:33.760
<v Speaker 1>the Lakers had taken a dip here. My first half

0:24:33.920 --> 0:24:38.040
<v Speaker 1>MVP would be Joel Embiid. He's averaging thirty and ten.

0:24:38.160 --> 0:24:40.639
<v Speaker 1>He's a major impact player on the defensive band. The

0:24:40.680 --> 0:24:43.280
<v Speaker 1>Sixers have the best record in the league, and his

0:24:43.359 --> 0:24:46.159
<v Speaker 1>last statement going to the All Star Break was forty

0:24:46.160 --> 0:24:49.000
<v Speaker 1>and nineteen against you know, Rudy Gobert and the team

0:24:49.000 --> 0:24:51.280
<v Speaker 1>of the best record in the league, hitting the clutch

0:24:51.400 --> 0:24:53.800
<v Speaker 1>three to send that thing in overtime. And then not

0:24:53.840 --> 0:24:56.240
<v Speaker 1>only has he been the best center in the NBA,

0:24:56.280 --> 0:24:58.040
<v Speaker 1>but he's one of the best referees. He got don

0:24:58.880 --> 0:25:01.520
<v Speaker 1>in that game. You know, how do you not go that?

0:25:01.880 --> 0:25:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Why is it that I look at him bead the

0:25:03.440 --> 0:25:05.679
<v Speaker 1>way I do James Harden And he'll never be in

0:25:05.720 --> 0:25:08.639
<v Speaker 1>as good enough shape as I think he should be.

0:25:09.200 --> 0:25:12.440
<v Speaker 1>But he is still incredible. He might be in great shape, tim,

0:25:12.880 --> 0:25:14.800
<v Speaker 1>I just don't know if he's ever gonna look like

0:25:14.920 --> 0:25:17.800
<v Speaker 1>he's in great shape. Yeah, And it's funny if you

0:25:17.840 --> 0:25:21.520
<v Speaker 1>look at him early in his career, he was definitely leaner.

0:25:21.600 --> 0:25:24.159
<v Speaker 1>And look, the thing with him beat is can he

0:25:25.000 --> 0:25:28.119
<v Speaker 1>play the vast majority of the games, and you know,

0:25:28.200 --> 0:25:30.879
<v Speaker 1>can he finished games strong and so far this season

0:25:30.960 --> 0:25:33.280
<v Speaker 1>that's happened. But you know, when Bead's a guy, you

0:25:33.320 --> 0:25:34.959
<v Speaker 1>know a lot of these guys, he liked to complain

0:25:35.000 --> 0:25:37.680
<v Speaker 1>about the boating of you know, for him in particular,

0:25:37.680 --> 0:25:40.800
<v Speaker 1>it's all NBA last year, how to go bargain over? Dude,

0:25:41.080 --> 0:25:43.760
<v Speaker 1>you missed twenty something games and your team finished six

0:25:43.800 --> 0:25:46.439
<v Speaker 1>and you know in the conference in the seventy sixers

0:25:46.480 --> 0:25:50.480
<v Speaker 1>were disappointing last season. So if MBAT continues producing like

0:25:50.600 --> 0:25:53.399
<v Speaker 1>he is, if the Sixers can fight off the nets

0:25:53.400 --> 0:25:56.119
<v Speaker 1>stay atop the Eastern Conference and he you know, to

0:25:56.200 --> 0:25:58.480
<v Speaker 1>do that, he's going to have to play the vast

0:25:58.480 --> 0:26:00.639
<v Speaker 1>majority of the games. I think right now, you know,

0:26:00.920 --> 0:26:02.960
<v Speaker 1>he would be number one on my ballot. What's the

0:26:03.040 --> 0:26:07.520
<v Speaker 1>update on Anthony Davis? Uh, you know, we will see.

0:26:07.640 --> 0:26:10.880
<v Speaker 1>Obviously that's a situation where, you know what, for the Lakers,

0:26:10.680 --> 0:26:14.480
<v Speaker 1>the seating isn't really important. You know, if they're a three,

0:26:14.640 --> 0:26:17.840
<v Speaker 1>four or five seat even going in the Western Conference playoffs,

0:26:17.800 --> 0:26:20.840
<v Speaker 1>if they have Lebron James and Anthony Davis healthy, they're

0:26:20.840 --> 0:26:22.359
<v Speaker 1>going to feel like they're the team to beat, and

0:26:22.520 --> 0:26:24.919
<v Speaker 1>you know what, I would agree with him. So, you know,

0:26:24.960 --> 0:26:27.119
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what the exact timetable for a D

0:26:27.359 --> 0:26:29.800
<v Speaker 1>is coming back after the All Star break, but I

0:26:29.800 --> 0:26:31.720
<v Speaker 1>do know that the Lakers aren't going to rush him.

0:26:31.760 --> 0:26:34.600
<v Speaker 1>They're they're thinking long term as they should. Yeah, I

0:26:34.680 --> 0:26:37.199
<v Speaker 1>know this isn't headline worthy, but if they don't have

0:26:37.240 --> 0:26:40.280
<v Speaker 1>Anthony Davis, they're not winning the championship this year. And

0:26:40.640 --> 0:26:43.120
<v Speaker 1>you know whatever it is, like, this is true load

0:26:43.200 --> 0:26:46.560
<v Speaker 1>management for somebody who needs load management with Anthony Davis.

0:26:47.080 --> 0:26:51.240
<v Speaker 1>Have the supporting cast? Has the supporting cast for the

0:26:51.320 --> 0:26:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Lakers lived up to its billing? No? I mean, look,

0:26:54.640 --> 0:26:57.320
<v Speaker 1>they've been a disappointment since since a D went down.

0:26:57.400 --> 0:27:01.399
<v Speaker 1>There's you know, there's no question about that. Um, you know,

0:27:01.520 --> 0:27:03.919
<v Speaker 1>there's too much on the bronze play. He hasn't been

0:27:03.960 --> 0:27:06.119
<v Speaker 1>able to you know, this was a chance for lebron

0:27:06.160 --> 0:27:11.000
<v Speaker 1>to kind of, you know, really enhance his MVP case

0:27:11.119 --> 0:27:13.200
<v Speaker 1>that that hasn't happened as well, but just the piece

0:27:13.320 --> 0:27:16.080
<v Speaker 1>or Marcusol has been a disappointment there. You know, Marcus

0:27:16.119 --> 0:27:18.959
<v Speaker 1>all looks like a guy who has had a great career,

0:27:19.000 --> 0:27:21.080
<v Speaker 1>but you know is out of gas at this point.

0:27:21.160 --> 0:27:23.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, we'll see if that changes in the second

0:27:23.320 --> 0:27:25.560
<v Speaker 1>half the season. Mantras, Harold is a guy with warts.

0:27:25.640 --> 0:27:27.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, he's there's a reason that after you got

0:27:27.960 --> 0:27:31.800
<v Speaker 1>six men the year, the Clippers were just fine. Let

0:27:31.840 --> 0:27:34.560
<v Speaker 1>him walk across the hallway. You know, the fact that

0:27:34.600 --> 0:27:38.280
<v Speaker 1>he's playing nineteen minutes in a game where Anthony Davis, uh,

0:27:38.520 --> 0:27:40.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, is wearing sweats on the bench, I think

0:27:40.440 --> 0:27:43.680
<v Speaker 1>that tells you a lot. And so you know they're

0:27:43.720 --> 0:27:46.919
<v Speaker 1>not invincible. But again, if A D and Lebron are healthy,

0:27:47.400 --> 0:27:49.399
<v Speaker 1>they can have some warts for that supporting cast. And

0:27:49.440 --> 0:27:51.199
<v Speaker 1>that's still the team that I would put my money on.

0:27:51.680 --> 0:27:55.000
<v Speaker 1>If they're completely healthy and the Nets are completely healthy,

0:27:55.560 --> 0:27:58.879
<v Speaker 1>you like the Lakers over the Nets. I would, just

0:27:59.000 --> 0:28:04.520
<v Speaker 1>because my general philosophy on the NBA is if Lebron

0:28:04.640 --> 0:28:08.080
<v Speaker 1>has a legitimate All NBA co star, I don't bet

0:28:08.080 --> 0:28:11.200
<v Speaker 1>against him. You know, if he's healthy, that's a legitimate

0:28:11.200 --> 0:28:14.680
<v Speaker 1>All NBA co star. I'm not betting against him. And

0:28:15.040 --> 0:28:20.720
<v Speaker 1>you know the Nets, uh, I mean, offensively, they are unbelievable. Um,

0:28:20.920 --> 0:28:23.200
<v Speaker 1>but you know, we'll see about their health as well.

0:28:23.359 --> 0:28:27.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, KD obviously has been banged up. Kyrie is

0:28:27.080 --> 0:28:31.040
<v Speaker 1>not exactly the most durable star in the league. You know,

0:28:31.080 --> 0:28:33.400
<v Speaker 1>we'll see how they're how they're looking going to playoffs.

0:28:33.400 --> 0:28:36.600
<v Speaker 1>But now the nets obviously are forced to be reckoned

0:28:36.640 --> 0:28:39.320
<v Speaker 1>with and I think, you know, statistically and just by

0:28:39.320 --> 0:28:43.160
<v Speaker 1>the eye test, the best offensive team that we've seen. Tim,

0:28:43.240 --> 0:28:44.840
<v Speaker 1>good to talk to you, have fun at the Old

0:28:44.880 --> 0:28:47.680
<v Speaker 1>Star Weekend. We appreciate your time as always, all right,

0:28:47.720 --> 0:28:50.880
<v Speaker 1>appreciate you having me. That's Tim McMahon, ESPN NBA staff

0:28:50.920 --> 0:28:53.640
<v Speaker 1>writer and did a deep dive on the Rockets divorce

0:28:53.920 --> 0:28:57.000
<v Speaker 1>from James Harden. Thanks for listening to The Dan Patrick

0:28:57.080 --> 0:28:59.800
<v Speaker 1>Show podcast. Be sure to catch us live every weekday

0:28:59.840 --> 0:29:02.640
<v Speaker 1>morning nine until noon eastern six to nine Pacific on

0:29:02.760 --> 0:29:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Fox Sports Radio, and you can find us on the

0:29:05.160 --> 0:29:09.360
<v Speaker 1>iHeartRadio app at FSR or stream us live on the

0:29:09.360 --> 0:29:13.720
<v Speaker 1>Peacock app. Ernie Johnson Junior, By the way, inside the

0:29:13.840 --> 0:29:18.160
<v Speaker 1>NBA Sports Emmy Award winning studio show UM, they have

0:29:18.280 --> 0:29:22.200
<v Speaker 1>a documentary. It's a four part documentary series and it

0:29:22.400 --> 0:29:25.600
<v Speaker 1>first part was last night. First episode aired last night.

0:29:25.640 --> 0:29:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Part two tonight. It's The Role Player at nine Eastern

0:29:29.240 --> 0:29:32.840
<v Speaker 1>and Ernesto Johnson Junior the third joining us on the program.

0:29:33.240 --> 0:29:37.160
<v Speaker 1>Good morning, Ernie, and I think good morning, Dad. I

0:29:37.200 --> 0:29:39.240
<v Speaker 1>think the answer to your question is why do those

0:29:39.360 --> 0:29:42.600
<v Speaker 1>UFOs never land as if if they did see our show,

0:29:43.640 --> 0:29:46.200
<v Speaker 1>they would Joe as it past. That's that's for sure.

0:29:46.240 --> 0:29:48.280
<v Speaker 1>How are you doing this morning. I'm doing great. I'm

0:29:48.320 --> 0:29:50.880
<v Speaker 1>doing great. Paulie brought up a question to me right

0:29:50.960 --> 0:29:53.120
<v Speaker 1>before I turned on the microphone to talk to you,

0:29:53.200 --> 0:29:56.200
<v Speaker 1>and he said, how did Ernie get the job as

0:29:56.200 --> 0:30:00.200
<v Speaker 1>the host of Inside the NBA? How did did you

0:30:00.280 --> 0:30:05.400
<v Speaker 1>get that. I was working in Atlanta at a station

0:30:05.440 --> 0:30:08.040
<v Speaker 1>you remember, at local station there because you were at

0:30:08.040 --> 0:30:10.600
<v Speaker 1>CNN at the time. I was working for WUSB. I

0:30:10.680 --> 0:30:15.200
<v Speaker 1>was the weekend sports anchor, and the folks at Turner

0:30:15.240 --> 0:30:18.160
<v Speaker 1>called one day and said, hey, would you want to

0:30:18.200 --> 0:30:21.920
<v Speaker 1>come and work with us because we have this role

0:30:22.040 --> 0:30:26.600
<v Speaker 1>for you as the host of our wide world of

0:30:26.680 --> 0:30:30.800
<v Speaker 1>sports type show called US Olympic Gold and so we'd

0:30:30.800 --> 0:30:32.920
<v Speaker 1>like you to host that for about a year and

0:30:33.040 --> 0:30:36.080
<v Speaker 1>then and then become the host of the good Will

0:30:36.120 --> 0:30:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Games in Seattle. And I said, that sounds that sounds good.

0:30:40.840 --> 0:30:42.800
<v Speaker 1>I'll do that. There was really not much talk about

0:30:42.800 --> 0:30:46.920
<v Speaker 1>the NBA at that point. As things worked out, there

0:30:47.000 --> 0:30:48.840
<v Speaker 1>was a bit of a power struggle at the top

0:30:48.840 --> 0:30:51.800
<v Speaker 1>of the good Will Games organization in between the time

0:30:51.840 --> 0:30:53.520
<v Speaker 1>I was hired and the time that the good Will

0:30:53.520 --> 0:30:57.360
<v Speaker 1>Games happened. And so Larry King became the host, and

0:30:57.440 --> 0:31:02.680
<v Speaker 1>he had Hannah's Storm and Charles as his co hosts.

0:31:03.280 --> 0:31:06.600
<v Speaker 1>And I was assigned to, uh, to all the sports

0:31:06.640 --> 0:31:09.440
<v Speaker 1>that Bode doesn't know, as I referred to it at

0:31:09.480 --> 0:31:17.240
<v Speaker 1>that point, judo, uh, team handball, um, uh, modern pentathlon.

0:31:17.600 --> 0:31:19.720
<v Speaker 1>I was, uh, that was kind of a jack of

0:31:19.720 --> 0:31:22.000
<v Speaker 1>all trades covering things at the Good World Game. So

0:31:22.360 --> 0:31:24.840
<v Speaker 1>that didn't exactly shake out the way it was supposed to,

0:31:25.000 --> 0:31:28.360
<v Speaker 1>but uh, but certainly in the long run. When when

0:31:28.400 --> 0:31:31.800
<v Speaker 1>they asked me to host the NBA, that was that

0:31:31.880 --> 0:31:34.120
<v Speaker 1>was pretty good career move. What was it like when

0:31:34.160 --> 0:31:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Barkley first came to town. I think we're all pumped.

0:31:39.240 --> 0:31:42.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, who wouldn't be, because this was like landing

0:31:42.240 --> 0:31:45.760
<v Speaker 1>the biggest free agent in history. Uh, this was you know,

0:31:45.880 --> 0:31:51.040
<v Speaker 1>this was um and especially what made it even even

0:31:51.240 --> 0:31:54.600
<v Speaker 1>better in a way was we had kind of resigned

0:31:54.600 --> 0:31:56.280
<v Speaker 1>ourselves to the fact that he was going to go

0:31:56.320 --> 0:31:58.840
<v Speaker 1>to NBC. You know that, you know he'll be over

0:31:58.880 --> 0:32:01.280
<v Speaker 1>there with them, and but will keeps doing our thing,

0:32:01.320 --> 0:32:03.920
<v Speaker 1>and Kenny and I you know, really enjoyed working together.

0:32:04.480 --> 0:32:07.720
<v Speaker 1>But man, when you land that, it's like, oh, this

0:32:07.800 --> 0:32:09.960
<v Speaker 1>is gonna be this is gonna be so much fun.

0:32:10.000 --> 0:32:12.000
<v Speaker 1>And my only question at the time was when the

0:32:12.040 --> 0:32:14.720
<v Speaker 1>novelty wears off, is Charles gonna say, Okay, that's enough

0:32:14.720 --> 0:32:16.800
<v Speaker 1>of this. I've done three shows, Now what else is

0:32:16.800 --> 0:32:21.360
<v Speaker 1>there in my life? So? Um, Fortunately, he's been He's

0:32:21.400 --> 0:32:23.800
<v Speaker 1>been with us for like twenty one years or twenty

0:32:23.880 --> 0:32:28.000
<v Speaker 1>years now, so uh no, it's he's been Dan as

0:32:28.040 --> 0:32:30.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, he's been tremendous and and the whole key

0:32:30.760 --> 0:32:34.680
<v Speaker 1>to that is he hasn't changed from the person he

0:32:34.880 --> 0:32:37.600
<v Speaker 1>was as a player to the person he is on TV.

0:32:38.440 --> 0:32:40.760
<v Speaker 1>And I think that See, that's the danger if you say,

0:32:40.760 --> 0:32:42.680
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden, yeah, I've been kind of this

0:32:42.720 --> 0:32:45.720
<v Speaker 1>outspoken guy and always you know, he's always opinionated. But

0:32:45.720 --> 0:32:47.960
<v Speaker 1>when the red light goes on, now I'm I'm gonna

0:32:48.040 --> 0:32:52.760
<v Speaker 1>hush up. And that's he's been so far over over

0:32:52.800 --> 0:32:55.560
<v Speaker 1>the edge on that it's night and funny and I

0:32:55.640 --> 0:32:58.360
<v Speaker 1>know that. Um, I don't think I mean this literally

0:32:58.360 --> 0:33:01.400
<v Speaker 1>of rehearsing. How much rehearse do you do? But we

0:33:01.520 --> 0:33:04.160
<v Speaker 1>have these meetings before show where you kind of go

0:33:04.200 --> 0:33:06.640
<v Speaker 1>over topics that you're going to bring up, or you

0:33:06.720 --> 0:33:09.400
<v Speaker 1>might clue somebody in on a joke that you might prank,

0:33:09.440 --> 0:33:12.200
<v Speaker 1>you play on somebody else. But how much of what

0:33:12.360 --> 0:33:14.800
<v Speaker 1>is said on the show itself are you aware of

0:33:14.840 --> 0:33:21.720
<v Speaker 1>before the show? None of it really from those guys. No,

0:33:22.000 --> 0:33:24.800
<v Speaker 1>not from them, because because of the production meeting, I'm

0:33:24.800 --> 0:33:27.320
<v Speaker 1>in there with Tim Kylie and Jeremy Levin who's ever

0:33:27.320 --> 0:33:30.080
<v Speaker 1>producing that night? And you know in about twenty twenty

0:33:30.080 --> 0:33:33.200
<v Speaker 1>five other people are on the call now on these

0:33:33.280 --> 0:33:36.400
<v Speaker 1>Zoom production meetings. Oh Shack and Charles and Kenny aren't

0:33:36.840 --> 0:33:39.080
<v Speaker 1>in on no no, no, no, no no no, they've

0:33:39.080 --> 0:33:43.000
<v Speaker 1>never been. And the and the thing is part of

0:33:43.040 --> 0:33:44.680
<v Speaker 1>that was by designed, but part of it was like

0:33:45.160 --> 0:33:47.520
<v Speaker 1>they were like, I'm not gonna sit in a meeting

0:33:47.520 --> 0:33:49.480
<v Speaker 1>for three three hours before we go on the air,

0:33:49.600 --> 0:33:52.200
<v Speaker 1>And it just works out better for us because if

0:33:52.240 --> 0:33:54.400
<v Speaker 1>we do have something we want to spring on Kenny

0:33:54.720 --> 0:33:56.960
<v Speaker 1>in an old piece of video where he gets his

0:33:57.000 --> 0:33:59.760
<v Speaker 1>pocket picked at mid court and somebody dunks, we don't

0:33:59.760 --> 0:34:02.120
<v Speaker 1>want him saying, oh yeah, can he get ready? Because

0:34:02.160 --> 0:34:04.480
<v Speaker 1>in the third segment of post game, we're gonna show this.

0:34:04.960 --> 0:34:06.680
<v Speaker 1>So that's what we want to do. We just want

0:34:06.680 --> 0:34:09.520
<v Speaker 1>to be able to spring things on people. And like

0:34:09.600 --> 0:34:12.719
<v Speaker 1>the other night, we we we you know, made up

0:34:12.760 --> 0:34:15.920
<v Speaker 1>this game show for Shack based on the fact that he,

0:34:16.960 --> 0:34:19.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, Pascal Siakam. The week before, I had said,

0:34:19.360 --> 0:34:21.120
<v Speaker 1>you got your eye on Pascal and he said, no,

0:34:21.160 --> 0:34:24.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm I've got my on Siakam. And it's like,

0:34:24.880 --> 0:34:26.960
<v Speaker 1>so the next week we had a game show on

0:34:27.000 --> 0:34:29.840
<v Speaker 1>the air. Could could you name the first what's the

0:34:29.880 --> 0:34:32.640
<v Speaker 1>first name of these players? And I told him and

0:34:32.719 --> 0:34:37.000
<v Speaker 1>I even told Shack, I said, look, here's here's our

0:34:37.080 --> 0:34:39.920
<v Speaker 1>stat sheet that we get from Elias or whoever. And

0:34:40.239 --> 0:34:42.960
<v Speaker 1>so every every name I'm gonna give you, it's it's

0:34:42.960 --> 0:34:44.920
<v Speaker 1>either in the top twenty of an apartment or the

0:34:44.960 --> 0:34:48.080
<v Speaker 1>top ten of an apartment, so you know, you know

0:34:48.160 --> 0:34:50.880
<v Speaker 1>here it is, here's the last name Monk, he plays

0:34:50.880 --> 0:34:57.359
<v Speaker 1>for Charlotte Eli, No, Molliak okay, And it was it

0:34:57.440 --> 0:34:59.840
<v Speaker 1>was just what we do. But do the producers have

0:35:00.080 --> 0:35:02.640
<v Speaker 1>the green light? Ernie? I know it feels like the

0:35:02.680 --> 0:35:07.040
<v Speaker 1>talent has the green light, but producers poking Hall of

0:35:07.080 --> 0:35:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Fame players everything? Are you allowed to, you know, suggest

0:35:12.520 --> 0:35:16.960
<v Speaker 1>something that might hurt somebody's feelings or make them uncomfortable. Yeah,

0:35:17.000 --> 0:35:19.600
<v Speaker 1>I think we've I think we've done this long enough

0:35:19.640 --> 0:35:21.600
<v Speaker 1>to know that no one's feelings are going to get

0:35:21.680 --> 0:35:24.399
<v Speaker 1>hurt if that were If that were the case, then

0:35:24.719 --> 0:35:27.080
<v Speaker 1>there wouldn't be a docuse series right now. People would

0:35:27.080 --> 0:35:30.520
<v Speaker 1>have bailed on the show. I'm talking about people who

0:35:30.560 --> 0:35:33.359
<v Speaker 1>were on the show long ago, because every every one

0:35:33.400 --> 0:35:36.520
<v Speaker 1>of us has been has been in the cross hears

0:35:36.600 --> 0:35:39.920
<v Speaker 1>from the other guys. So, but Shack does poke Charles,

0:35:40.040 --> 0:35:44.040
<v Speaker 1>it feels like there's a little bit more tension. No,

0:35:45.239 --> 0:35:49.120
<v Speaker 1>it's man, did you see Shack the other night on

0:35:49.239 --> 0:35:54.359
<v Speaker 1>the wrestling thing? Yeah, okay, Shack knows drama. Shack knows

0:35:54.440 --> 0:35:57.680
<v Speaker 1>TV that Shack knows what's good. You know. So if

0:35:57.680 --> 0:36:00.400
<v Speaker 1>Shack's going to raise his voice at Chuck because they

0:36:00.400 --> 0:36:04.480
<v Speaker 1>can't agree on exactly where Kris stops Porzingis should be

0:36:04.840 --> 0:36:08.120
<v Speaker 1>in the Dallas offense, it's it's not that they're going

0:36:08.160 --> 0:36:10.440
<v Speaker 1>to step out in the parking lot. It's just, you know,

0:36:10.440 --> 0:36:13.399
<v Speaker 1>it's good, it's good conversation, but it's never forced. It's

0:36:13.440 --> 0:36:15.759
<v Speaker 1>never something like, well, Shack's just going to take this

0:36:15.800 --> 0:36:17.920
<v Speaker 1>position so that we can have an argument on the air.

0:36:17.960 --> 0:36:20.200
<v Speaker 1>It's just these guys have different philosophies on the game.

0:36:20.680 --> 0:36:25.000
<v Speaker 1>So now, but please rest assured. There is not going

0:36:25.040 --> 0:36:28.400
<v Speaker 1>to be this heavyweight bout of you know, seven hundred

0:36:28.480 --> 0:36:32.080
<v Speaker 1>pounds of humanity wrestling on the floor. I'd like to

0:36:32.120 --> 0:36:35.719
<v Speaker 1>see it, but no, have you ever gotten hurt? Have

0:36:35.760 --> 0:36:39.439
<v Speaker 1>I ever gotten hurt on the show? Doing what? Like

0:36:39.640 --> 0:36:42.520
<v Speaker 1>you're sort of in between those guys or you're just

0:36:42.840 --> 0:36:46.440
<v Speaker 1>sort of an innocent bystander, then you somehow you're getting

0:36:46.440 --> 0:36:49.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's collateral damage. Now, Dan, you know me,

0:36:49.960 --> 0:36:52.279
<v Speaker 1>I'm a sensitive guy. I've only had my feelings hurt.

0:36:52.320 --> 0:36:57.520
<v Speaker 1>There has been no physical pain. It's emotional, emotional pain.

0:36:57.640 --> 0:37:03.680
<v Speaker 1>I get it. Why are we having all our weekend? Well, um,

0:37:04.480 --> 0:37:09.160
<v Speaker 1>I think because it's a tradition, and it's because obviously

0:37:09.200 --> 0:37:13.439
<v Speaker 1>there are monetary issues that you know, I'm the last

0:37:13.440 --> 0:37:16.879
<v Speaker 1>guy to ask about what something's going to mean from

0:37:16.920 --> 0:37:20.480
<v Speaker 1>a fiscal standpoint, but I think, I mean, the commissioner

0:37:20.520 --> 0:37:22.879
<v Speaker 1>was pretty forthright about that, and he said, yeah, look,

0:37:22.920 --> 0:37:24.440
<v Speaker 1>we want to do this, and it looks like the

0:37:24.440 --> 0:37:26.799
<v Speaker 1>fans want it because there's so much voting and that

0:37:26.880 --> 0:37:28.839
<v Speaker 1>kind of thing. But he also was like, look, we

0:37:28.880 --> 0:37:31.640
<v Speaker 1>need to we need to do this financially, and so

0:37:32.600 --> 0:37:36.960
<v Speaker 1>having it in Atlanta certainly reduces all the travel for

0:37:37.040 --> 0:37:39.319
<v Speaker 1>all of our folks because you know, we have the

0:37:39.360 --> 0:37:43.480
<v Speaker 1>game on TNT, so there's nobody flying cross country or

0:37:43.520 --> 0:37:45.440
<v Speaker 1>flying here and there and that kind of thing, and

0:37:46.000 --> 0:37:49.719
<v Speaker 1>all the equipments here. So uh, that's that's why we're

0:37:49.719 --> 0:37:51.959
<v Speaker 1>having it. I was surprised, you know, I didn't think,

0:37:52.280 --> 0:37:54.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, when the word came down that there was

0:37:54.960 --> 0:37:59.560
<v Speaker 1>going to be one. I was surprised. I thought, just

0:37:59.640 --> 0:38:01.959
<v Speaker 1>from my view, it was going to be Wow, let's hey,

0:38:02.040 --> 0:38:04.120
<v Speaker 1>let's get to the All Star break and then everybody

0:38:04.200 --> 0:38:06.000
<v Speaker 1>sit back and take a deep breath and say, hey,

0:38:06.080 --> 0:38:08.319
<v Speaker 1>we did this all right now, now what can we

0:38:08.360 --> 0:38:11.360
<v Speaker 1>do on the second half. But but again, they have

0:38:11.400 --> 0:38:15.080
<v Speaker 1>their reasons for doing it. And I'm in a few hours,

0:38:15.120 --> 0:38:19.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm heading down to the Omni Hotel to quarantine for

0:38:19.960 --> 0:38:23.400
<v Speaker 1>a couple of days and get tested today. I was

0:38:23.440 --> 0:38:25.920
<v Speaker 1>tested last night. I'll get tested again today and tomorrow

0:38:25.920 --> 0:38:29.200
<v Speaker 1>and then go to the arena Sunday and we'll do

0:38:29.239 --> 0:38:33.560
<v Speaker 1>the thing. The four part documentary on inside the NBA,

0:38:33.719 --> 0:38:36.800
<v Speaker 1>you can see it on TNT tonight is the role player.

0:38:36.960 --> 0:38:41.040
<v Speaker 1>That's part two. What's the best item in your man

0:38:41.080 --> 0:38:46.360
<v Speaker 1>cave or your office? There? Picture of me and my

0:38:46.480 --> 0:38:50.640
<v Speaker 1>dad is pretty cool right there, all over your right shoulder, Yeah,

0:38:50.719 --> 0:38:55.480
<v Speaker 1>right there from back in fifty nine, I believe, as

0:38:55.600 --> 0:38:58.520
<v Speaker 1>last year with the Braves. That was from like a

0:38:58.560 --> 0:39:03.440
<v Speaker 1>father Sunday. What else we got here? Uh, Georgia Jersey.

0:39:03.480 --> 0:39:06.400
<v Speaker 1>That says poppy, which is what my grandkids call me. Um.

0:39:06.600 --> 0:39:08.799
<v Speaker 1>But there's a bunch of stuff in here. We call this.

0:39:09.040 --> 0:39:12.360
<v Speaker 1>We call this the room because my dad sent me

0:39:12.400 --> 0:39:15.799
<v Speaker 1>a clipping one time from the AJC that talked about

0:39:15.800 --> 0:39:18.799
<v Speaker 1>our high school baseball game. And he just and then

0:39:18.840 --> 0:39:21.440
<v Speaker 1>he said, here, put this in the room when it's built.

0:39:21.520 --> 0:39:24.480
<v Speaker 1>And so you know, he says that back in the

0:39:24.560 --> 0:39:27.319
<v Speaker 1>in the eighties or the seventies, and so my wife

0:39:27.320 --> 0:39:28.960
<v Speaker 1>and I said, you know what, we're gonna make the room.

0:39:29.040 --> 0:39:30.759
<v Speaker 1>So we just got a bunch of stuff in here. Man,

0:39:30.960 --> 0:39:35.040
<v Speaker 1>I have a very hard time throwing things away. Any

0:39:35.239 --> 0:39:42.319
<v Speaker 1>sports Emmy's in there. Uh, there's one right there. Okay,

0:39:42.640 --> 0:39:46.640
<v Speaker 1>they're probably probably my name on it, probably should have

0:39:46.760 --> 0:39:49.719
<v Speaker 1>my name on it. Oh, without question, without question, have

0:39:49.760 --> 0:39:53.520
<v Speaker 1>you ever wanted and felt guilty that I was out

0:39:53.520 --> 0:39:58.040
<v Speaker 1>there in the audience and I didn't win it. Yeah,

0:39:57.680 --> 0:40:00.640
<v Speaker 1>I look, I'm you're I'm to try to make a

0:40:00.960 --> 0:40:02.720
<v Speaker 1>try to answer this in a way that doesn't sound

0:40:02.760 --> 0:40:07.759
<v Speaker 1>like it's mamby pamby bs um. Whenever my name is

0:40:07.760 --> 0:40:10.280
<v Speaker 1>called on that thing, it's like, how did that happen?

0:40:10.719 --> 0:40:12.880
<v Speaker 1>Because I always look out there and I see and

0:40:13.200 --> 0:40:14.880
<v Speaker 1>you look at the list of guys and it and

0:40:15.000 --> 0:40:17.400
<v Speaker 1>every year it could go to anybody, any of those

0:40:17.800 --> 0:40:21.160
<v Speaker 1>you know five that are that are nominated. Um. Yeah,

0:40:21.160 --> 0:40:24.080
<v Speaker 1>but there's there's a special bitter suite feeling when you

0:40:24.160 --> 0:40:26.720
<v Speaker 1>leave the stage and I you and I lock eyes,

0:40:26.800 --> 0:40:30.279
<v Speaker 1>and but I always wonder when I see you win,

0:40:30.400 --> 0:40:33.120
<v Speaker 1>like how did I not win? When we lock eyes?

0:40:33.320 --> 0:40:38.960
<v Speaker 1>So like how did that happen? Is what I say. Well,

0:40:39.040 --> 0:40:41.640
<v Speaker 1>that's an upset for the ages. How did it? Yes? Yeah,

0:40:41.680 --> 0:40:45.200
<v Speaker 1>But but I will say I am pretty phony when

0:40:45.200 --> 0:40:49.279
<v Speaker 1>it comes to applauding, because I mean, I'm used to

0:40:49.280 --> 0:40:52.239
<v Speaker 1>be in there with Bob Costas, So when Costas doesn't win,

0:40:52.320 --> 0:40:55.200
<v Speaker 1>I go, I'm in like this is mine. And then

0:40:55.239 --> 0:40:58.240
<v Speaker 1>when he's not nominated, everybody feels like, oh, we're thrilled

0:40:58.200 --> 0:41:01.920
<v Speaker 1>on a chance, and then all of a sudden and

0:41:01.960 --> 0:41:05.880
<v Speaker 1>the winner is Ernie Jo And then I'm like, I

0:41:05.920 --> 0:41:08.960
<v Speaker 1>gotta be really quick because I like you and I

0:41:09.040 --> 0:41:11.799
<v Speaker 1>root for you, but after a while I don't like

0:41:11.920 --> 0:41:15.439
<v Speaker 1>you and don't root for you. So that's so kind

0:41:15.480 --> 0:41:18.239
<v Speaker 1>of it. But you know what's funny is when you're

0:41:19.320 --> 0:41:22.239
<v Speaker 1>just to the point we made when for so many

0:41:22.280 --> 0:41:25.440
<v Speaker 1>years when Bob was nominated, it was like, okay, good,

0:41:25.480 --> 0:41:27.960
<v Speaker 1>I'll yeah, I'll go, but I'm just gonna be there

0:41:28.000 --> 0:41:30.279
<v Speaker 1>to cheer for Bob, you know, when when his name

0:41:30.360 --> 0:41:35.640
<v Speaker 1>is called. But those times when hold on, I'm nominated. Here,

0:41:35.800 --> 0:41:38.480
<v Speaker 1>costUS is not the guy who's won eight hundred and

0:41:38.520 --> 0:41:41.160
<v Speaker 1>fifty seven of these bad boys, we got a chance.

0:41:41.280 --> 0:41:43.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if I ever told you this story,

0:41:43.480 --> 0:41:46.279
<v Speaker 1>but there was one year when costUS wasn't nominated for

0:41:46.280 --> 0:41:50.480
<v Speaker 1>the Best Studio Host and I'm nominated along with Chris Berman,

0:41:51.280 --> 0:41:53.759
<v Speaker 1>and I'm not sure who else was nominated, but I'm

0:41:53.800 --> 0:41:58.560
<v Speaker 1>at the table they had tables back then, and I'm

0:41:58.719 --> 0:42:01.479
<v Speaker 1>sitting there and Chris Berman is talking to a couple

0:42:01.480 --> 0:42:05.399
<v Speaker 1>of produce Scott Akerson was one of our producers. Bob

0:42:05.520 --> 0:42:08.479
<v Speaker 1>Rousher was a produce, and he's telling them that, yeah,

0:42:09.000 --> 0:42:12.799
<v Speaker 1>I gotta thank I gotta thank Tommy me. Yeah. Yeah.

0:42:13.160 --> 0:42:16.080
<v Speaker 1>So he's going down the list of everybody's going to thank,

0:42:17.200 --> 0:42:21.560
<v Speaker 1>and then he looks at me and he goes, good luck. Well,

0:42:23.640 --> 0:42:27.480
<v Speaker 1>I win the Sports Emmy, Ernie. I come back at

0:42:27.480 --> 0:42:30.799
<v Speaker 1>the table and it's as if I walked into a week.

0:42:33.640 --> 0:42:36.440
<v Speaker 1>I called my wife and I and she goes, you

0:42:36.440 --> 0:42:40.759
<v Speaker 1>don't sound excited. I go, oh hone, it's bad. I

0:42:40.840 --> 0:42:44.800
<v Speaker 1>walked out of the Sports Emmy's after that, went down

0:42:44.880 --> 0:42:50.000
<v Speaker 1>to Clark's and had a drive. I brought the Emmy

0:42:48.880 --> 0:42:52.640
<v Speaker 1>and I sat at the bar with my Emmy and

0:42:52.719 --> 0:42:55.800
<v Speaker 1>I just had I had a couple of beers because

0:42:55.840 --> 0:43:00.319
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't just sit there by yourself. Yes, yes, what

0:43:00.400 --> 0:43:03.600
<v Speaker 1>a what an image? I know, but I felt bad

0:43:03.960 --> 0:43:08.279
<v Speaker 1>that like Chris. The reason why I won is that

0:43:08.480 --> 0:43:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Chris opened the door for us to be able to

0:43:10.560 --> 0:43:13.440
<v Speaker 1>have fun on Sports Center. Really, Chris is as influential

0:43:13.440 --> 0:43:16.000
<v Speaker 1>as anybody who's ever done this. But I felt bad.

0:43:16.080 --> 0:43:18.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm just there with that Sports Emmy and he's right

0:43:18.400 --> 0:43:21.799
<v Speaker 1>across the table from me, and I felt terrible. And

0:43:21.920 --> 0:43:24.640
<v Speaker 1>I just remember going I'm going down the street and

0:43:24.880 --> 0:43:28.920
<v Speaker 1>uh just went to a bar, sat there with Miami drank.

0:43:29.000 --> 0:43:35.160
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, yeah, what a touching and disturbing story. Yes,

0:43:35.400 --> 0:43:38.319
<v Speaker 1>thank you that That is the title of my documentary.

0:43:38.320 --> 0:43:42.160
<v Speaker 1>It's a four part documentary, touching and disturbing the Dan

0:43:42.320 --> 0:43:48.880
<v Speaker 1>Patrick's story. Play nice this weekend. By the way, okay, yeah,

0:43:48.920 --> 0:43:51.360
<v Speaker 1>of course, yeah, of course. Hey. By the way, Chuckster

0:43:51.480 --> 0:43:54.120
<v Speaker 1>will not be with us for All Star coverage. Oh

0:43:54.200 --> 0:43:57.799
<v Speaker 1>his daughter is getting married? Yeah, how about do you

0:43:57.840 --> 0:44:02.400
<v Speaker 1>think do you think he cries? No, doubt love, No,

0:44:02.560 --> 0:44:05.360
<v Speaker 1>he's crying right now. I mean, it's it's not you

0:44:05.400 --> 0:44:08.879
<v Speaker 1>know what. And I've been down that road and it's fine.

0:44:09.040 --> 0:44:11.759
<v Speaker 1>Did you cry? Oh yeah, yeah I did. But you

0:44:11.800 --> 0:44:16.680
<v Speaker 1>know what, um, and see, I'm I'm a sucker. You

0:44:16.719 --> 0:44:20.760
<v Speaker 1>know the movie Father of the Bride Steve Martin, because

0:44:20.760 --> 0:44:24.320
<v Speaker 1>that that always tears me up. And so I actually

0:44:25.120 --> 0:44:29.200
<v Speaker 1>tried to circumvent me crying too much at Maggie's wedding

0:44:29.320 --> 0:44:31.680
<v Speaker 1>by watching the movie like two nights before, just trying

0:44:31.680 --> 0:44:34.000
<v Speaker 1>to get it out of my sister. And all it

0:44:34.040 --> 0:44:37.279
<v Speaker 1>did was exacerbate the situation something I mean, because I mean,

0:44:37.320 --> 0:44:38.719
<v Speaker 1>You're sitting there and you're and you're about to do

0:44:38.719 --> 0:44:40.399
<v Speaker 1>it and you look in your daughter's eyes and it's

0:44:40.440 --> 0:44:42.800
<v Speaker 1>just like, oh my goodness, I gotta do it three times.

0:44:43.280 --> 0:44:46.719
<v Speaker 1>But I wasn't a mess though. Oh it's dan, it's

0:44:46.760 --> 0:44:50.959
<v Speaker 1>the it's the it's the greatest. You know, there's there's

0:44:51.000 --> 0:44:54.919
<v Speaker 1>this this great part, there's this horrible part. But when

0:44:54.960 --> 0:44:57.480
<v Speaker 1>they when they mesh together, it just makes for the

0:44:57.520 --> 0:45:00.000
<v Speaker 1>most unforgettable, cool day. You'll never forget it. You got

0:45:00.200 --> 0:45:02.879
<v Speaker 1>with three time. Yeah, I got three daughters. Yeah I've

0:45:02.880 --> 0:45:06.600
<v Speaker 1>got I'll be doing this again at some point too.

0:45:06.640 --> 0:45:09.279
<v Speaker 1>But um, but it was, you know, to do that.

0:45:09.360 --> 0:45:11.480
<v Speaker 1>And I was also the best man at my son

0:45:11.800 --> 0:45:17.120
<v Speaker 1>Eric's wedding. So I've had these wonderful, incredible moments. And

0:45:17.120 --> 0:45:20.200
<v Speaker 1>and so if anybody ever has fun saying, oh is

0:45:20.200 --> 0:45:23.600
<v Speaker 1>anybody gonna cry, you go ahead, man. If there's ever

0:45:23.680 --> 0:45:26.560
<v Speaker 1>a reason to cry, it's a it's moments like this.

0:45:26.840 --> 0:45:29.239
<v Speaker 1>I have suggested to my daughters that all three get

0:45:29.280 --> 0:45:33.120
<v Speaker 1>married on the same day, cut cost and cut down

0:45:33.120 --> 0:45:37.200
<v Speaker 1>on the tears. That would be uh, that would be unique.

0:45:37.200 --> 0:45:41.000
<v Speaker 1>You know what I think when I when when Eric

0:45:41.040 --> 0:45:43.040
<v Speaker 1>and Maggie both got married, they got married a month

0:45:43.040 --> 0:45:47.680
<v Speaker 1>apart in the same year. Um, so that's why I'm

0:45:47.680 --> 0:45:54.319
<v Speaker 1>gonna be working until I'm ninety three. Ernie. Great to

0:45:54.320 --> 0:45:57.279
<v Speaker 1>talk to you, and happy to play a role in

0:45:57.320 --> 0:46:00.719
<v Speaker 1>some small part in the documentary series. I meant to

0:46:00.719 --> 0:46:03.640
<v Speaker 1>I meant to say that too, Dan, I'm sorry, because no,

0:46:03.880 --> 0:46:06.040
<v Speaker 1>they had so many they talked to so many folks

0:46:06.080 --> 0:46:09.240
<v Speaker 1>you include it, and the way our editors and everybody.

0:46:09.480 --> 0:46:11.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they've done a spectacular job. And I don't

0:46:11.680 --> 0:46:13.120
<v Speaker 1>know if you've watched the whole thing or any of

0:46:13.120 --> 0:46:15.600
<v Speaker 1>it at all, but the way they put put this

0:46:15.640 --> 0:46:18.799
<v Speaker 1>thing together, and with the comments of folks like you

0:46:18.880 --> 0:46:24.400
<v Speaker 1>and Will Bond and others and common and you name it,

0:46:24.400 --> 0:46:27.319
<v Speaker 1>it's just they did a spectacular job. And it's it's

0:46:27.360 --> 0:46:29.719
<v Speaker 1>not me just saying hey, this is great because it's

0:46:29.719 --> 0:46:32.439
<v Speaker 1>about our show. But there are times when you watch

0:46:32.480 --> 0:46:35.520
<v Speaker 1>a show, watch a documentary something like this and say, man,

0:46:35.680 --> 0:46:39.359
<v Speaker 1>is that well put together? It really is. So thanks

0:46:39.400 --> 0:46:41.239
<v Speaker 1>for thanks for all your kind words about the show.

0:46:41.239 --> 0:46:44.600
<v Speaker 1>Man you would you were awesome. And if you win

0:46:44.719 --> 0:46:48.320
<v Speaker 1>another Sports Emmy because of this documentary that I've been praising,

0:46:50.640 --> 0:46:55.200
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't seem right though. If that happens, I'm just

0:46:56.000 --> 0:47:01.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm going down to Clark's, but by yourself with your emmy.

0:47:01.680 --> 0:47:06.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah yeah, setting me up. Sal yeah, have another round.

0:47:06.760 --> 0:47:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Thank thank you, Ernie. Have a great weekend, any buddy.

0:47:10.600 --> 0:47:14.640
<v Speaker 1>That's ERNESTO. Johnson Junior, the third TNT inside the NBA.

0:47:15.280 --> 0:47:17.399
<v Speaker 1>Be sure to catch the live edition of The Dan

0:47:17.480 --> 0:47:21.120
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Show weekdays at nine am Eastern six am Pacific

0:47:21.360 --> 0:47:24.279
<v Speaker 1>on Fox Sports Radio and the iHeartRadio app.