WEBVTT - Chuck's Commentary - Mass Shootings In A PolarizedCountry + Ask Chuck

0:00:04.080 --> 0:00:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Hello, They're happy Thursday. Welcome to another episode of the

0:00:07.200 --> 0:00:10.400
<v Speaker 1>Chuck Podcast. A little quick programming note. This is my

0:00:10.480 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>ASSD update for the month of August, and in fact

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:18.000
<v Speaker 1>we will not be dropping an episode on Monday on

0:00:18.079 --> 0:00:21.400
<v Speaker 1>Labor Day. We will be though, doing Tuesday, so the

0:00:21.480 --> 0:00:25.320
<v Speaker 1>same three updates next week, but instead of Monday, Wednesday Thursday,

0:00:26.280 --> 0:00:29.600
<v Speaker 1>it will be Tuesday Wednesday Thursday. So just a little

0:00:30.040 --> 0:00:36.680
<v Speaker 1>programming note on that front. Obviously, begin tip and Wednesday

0:00:36.960 --> 0:00:42.479
<v Speaker 1>afternoon evening here for Thursday morning. The big news, correctly

0:00:42.520 --> 0:00:46.199
<v Speaker 1>consuming much of the much of the political and news

0:00:46.280 --> 0:00:51.400
<v Speaker 1>world is the mass shooting in Minneapolis at that Catholic school.

0:00:54.200 --> 0:00:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Given what I did for a living doing live television

0:00:58.680 --> 0:01:04.080
<v Speaker 1>and anchor many many A special reports when it came

0:01:04.160 --> 0:01:08.360
<v Speaker 1>to school shootings, sadly, there's a pattern. There's a pattern

0:01:08.360 --> 0:01:11.320
<v Speaker 1>in coverage. There's a pattern, you know, where there's sort

0:01:11.319 --> 0:01:14.080
<v Speaker 1>of there's there's a lot of this that becomes very familiar.

0:01:15.360 --> 0:01:21.280
<v Speaker 1>There is a quick, sort of all consuming moment and

0:01:21.319 --> 0:01:24.800
<v Speaker 1>then as fast as people pay attention is as fast

0:01:25.640 --> 0:01:31.200
<v Speaker 1>as the coverage usually goes away. Uh. There in many

0:01:31.240 --> 0:01:35.840
<v Speaker 1>cases this is fitting a pattern. Young person in their

0:01:35.880 --> 0:01:40.440
<v Speaker 1>twenties shoots up a school that they once attended, a

0:01:40.520 --> 0:01:44.160
<v Speaker 1>manifesto that sort of indicates a lot of mental health challenges,

0:01:44.640 --> 0:01:46.319
<v Speaker 1>and you ask yourself, how did this person get all

0:01:46.360 --> 0:01:50.880
<v Speaker 1>these weapons? And there's good, there's so, there's there's certainly,

0:01:52.200 --> 0:01:55.280
<v Speaker 1>And this is where I hope we can have political

0:01:55.400 --> 0:01:59.520
<v Speaker 1>leaders try to have an uh, what I would call

0:01:59.560 --> 0:02:03.280
<v Speaker 1>an am conversation rather than an or conversation. Too many

0:02:03.280 --> 0:02:08.080
<v Speaker 1>times with these school shootings, I think everybody wants everybody's

0:02:08.080 --> 0:02:13.680
<v Speaker 1>the wrong word. There's sometimes a political instinct too. If

0:02:13.720 --> 0:02:16.320
<v Speaker 1>you believe in an idea, if you believe in gun control,

0:02:16.400 --> 0:02:18.000
<v Speaker 1>or you believe that this is a mental health issue,

0:02:18.000 --> 0:02:22.680
<v Speaker 1>whichever one it is, you find you find a piece

0:02:22.960 --> 0:02:30.119
<v Speaker 1>something in the current investigation that reinforces your belief and

0:02:30.200 --> 0:02:33.959
<v Speaker 1>you sort of dismiss the idea that there are other

0:02:34.040 --> 0:02:38.320
<v Speaker 1>factors that contribute here beyond what your core belief is

0:02:38.360 --> 0:02:40.560
<v Speaker 1>the motivation of these things, whether you believe it's a

0:02:40.600 --> 0:02:44.079
<v Speaker 1>mental health is the primary issue, Access to guns is

0:02:44.120 --> 0:02:48.080
<v Speaker 1>the primary issue, School security is the primary issue. Rhetoric

0:02:49.960 --> 0:02:54.399
<v Speaker 1>rhetoric online being the issue right there, And my encouragement

0:02:54.400 --> 0:02:55.960
<v Speaker 1>would be I wish we could get to a place

0:02:55.960 --> 0:02:59.200
<v Speaker 1>where we had some and conversations. Let's look at the

0:02:59.240 --> 0:03:03.440
<v Speaker 1>access to weapons and the conversation and the rhetoric that

0:03:03.480 --> 0:03:08.320
<v Speaker 1>takes place on social media, and the divisive and divisiveness

0:03:08.320 --> 0:03:11.919
<v Speaker 1>and hate that's going around, and the issue with protecting

0:03:12.000 --> 0:03:16.000
<v Speaker 1>kids in schools and the issue of mental health for

0:03:16.080 --> 0:03:20.040
<v Speaker 1>young people. I think we all know, unfortunately that we're

0:03:20.040 --> 0:03:22.760
<v Speaker 1>not going to have and the conversations that we'd like

0:03:22.840 --> 0:03:28.920
<v Speaker 1>to have. This particular story has the potential of truly

0:03:28.960 --> 0:03:32.800
<v Speaker 1>becoming very divisive in our culture wars, given that the

0:03:32.840 --> 0:03:37.080
<v Speaker 1>shooter transitioned from being a man to a woman, This

0:03:37.160 --> 0:03:45.240
<v Speaker 1>is already something that many on social media are using

0:03:45.280 --> 0:03:47.600
<v Speaker 1>and want to make certain points. Again, it's an attempt

0:03:47.680 --> 0:03:52.440
<v Speaker 1>to cherry pick something to reinforce a core belief, regardless

0:03:52.480 --> 0:03:55.160
<v Speaker 1>of any of the other factors that may be involved

0:03:55.200 --> 0:04:00.960
<v Speaker 1>in this situation. So this is one of those times

0:04:01.000 --> 0:04:05.800
<v Speaker 1>where you're just where I get hopeful that the political

0:04:05.800 --> 0:04:10.960
<v Speaker 1>community will be mature and sort of rise above partisanship,

0:04:11.120 --> 0:04:14.040
<v Speaker 1>rise above the ability to exploit something for a cheap

0:04:14.080 --> 0:04:20.840
<v Speaker 1>political gain. And yet what world am I living in? Right?

0:04:21.760 --> 0:04:24.840
<v Speaker 1>I think we know that this has every chance of

0:04:24.880 --> 0:04:29.960
<v Speaker 1>being politicized in all the wrong ways. I hope I'm wrong.

0:04:32.080 --> 0:04:35.960
<v Speaker 1>I hope that the online conversation is the outlier and

0:04:36.000 --> 0:04:41.080
<v Speaker 1>that the in person conversations that the focus is in

0:04:41.120 --> 0:04:46.479
<v Speaker 1>the right direction here. Unlikely. I'm aware of the world

0:04:46.560 --> 0:04:51.760
<v Speaker 1>we live in, but it is this is something where

0:04:51.960 --> 0:04:55.880
<v Speaker 1>I wish we could have this and conversation because you

0:04:56.000 --> 0:04:59.039
<v Speaker 1>have rabid people who don't even want to touch the

0:04:59.120 --> 0:05:04.320
<v Speaker 1>access to guns issue, and you have others that don't

0:05:04.320 --> 0:05:19.360
<v Speaker 1>want to have certain conversations about rhetoric online, about about identity,

0:05:19.440 --> 0:05:23.120
<v Speaker 1>and so this is going to be one of those

0:05:23.160 --> 0:05:26.799
<v Speaker 1>moments where you need a really good leader, and perhaps

0:05:26.880 --> 0:05:29.400
<v Speaker 1>in a tough moment, we don't have the leadership in

0:05:29.400 --> 0:05:33.400
<v Speaker 1>this country to rise to the occasion that's necessary. But

0:05:33.480 --> 0:05:42.440
<v Speaker 1>hope Spring's eternal, and perhaps and perhaps cooler heads and

0:05:42.680 --> 0:05:48.440
<v Speaker 1>more empathetic heads are going to prevail here. But we

0:05:48.480 --> 0:05:57.840
<v Speaker 1>shall see. We are at a moment for what it's worth. Right,

0:05:57.880 --> 0:06:00.760
<v Speaker 1>We're going to have some federal agencies. We've already had

0:06:00.960 --> 0:06:04.880
<v Speaker 1>the FBI director pretty high profile talk about that he

0:06:04.920 --> 0:06:08.640
<v Speaker 1>wants to make that they're investigating this as a hate

0:06:08.640 --> 0:06:14.080
<v Speaker 1>crime against Catholics, and they're looking at this as domestic terrorism.

0:06:14.880 --> 0:06:19.760
<v Speaker 1>I've heard from some folks fearing that the calling it

0:06:19.839 --> 0:06:25.000
<v Speaker 1>domestic terrorism will then single out certain groups of people.

0:06:26.720 --> 0:06:31.080
<v Speaker 1>I am. I am hopeful that does not happen, but

0:06:31.560 --> 0:06:35.440
<v Speaker 1>it does serve as a reminder of the importance of

0:06:35.440 --> 0:06:41.920
<v Speaker 1>whether you trust law enforcement or not. And there's actually

0:06:41.920 --> 0:06:45.320
<v Speaker 1>some new polling data indicating just how polarized we are

0:06:45.839 --> 0:06:50.800
<v Speaker 1>in our trust or distrust of law enforcement agencies right

0:06:50.839 --> 0:06:54.560
<v Speaker 1>now that it is completely based on what your political

0:06:54.560 --> 0:06:57.239
<v Speaker 1>party is when it comes to your views of ICE,

0:06:57.640 --> 0:06:59.800
<v Speaker 1>your views of the Department of Homeland Security, your views

0:06:59.800 --> 0:07:02.720
<v Speaker 1>of the Department of Justice, your views of the FBI.

0:07:04.480 --> 0:07:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Just to give you a taste of this conversation on

0:07:07.600 --> 0:07:12.800
<v Speaker 1>the Department of Justice. From the big picture standpoint, the

0:07:12.880 --> 0:07:15.960
<v Speaker 1>numbers haven't changed all that much. Right last year overall,

0:07:16.880 --> 0:07:18.800
<v Speaker 1>the Department of Justice in this Pew survey had a

0:07:18.840 --> 0:07:24.560
<v Speaker 1>forty three favorable rating versus a forty four percent unfavorable rating. Okay,

0:07:26.440 --> 0:07:29.120
<v Speaker 1>this year right now, it's thirty nine percent favorable forty

0:07:29.160 --> 0:07:32.240
<v Speaker 1>six percent unfavorable. But boy, when you go inside the numbers,

0:07:33.080 --> 0:07:37.400
<v Speaker 1>you start to see the politic how politicized the views

0:07:37.440 --> 0:07:42.000
<v Speaker 1>of these agencies are. Majority of Republicans now rate the

0:07:42.040 --> 0:07:46.240
<v Speaker 1>Department of Justice favorably. It's up eighteen points from Republican

0:07:46.320 --> 0:07:49.160
<v Speaker 1>views of the Department of Justice last year. And guess

0:07:49.240 --> 0:07:52.160
<v Speaker 1>what the trend is the opposite among Democrats. Just twenty

0:07:52.200 --> 0:07:55.720
<v Speaker 1>eight percent of Democrats view the Justice Department favorably, and

0:07:55.760 --> 0:07:59.680
<v Speaker 1>that's down twenty seven points from last year. You can

0:07:59.720 --> 0:08:04.680
<v Speaker 1>see similar polarized movements when it comes to the favorable

0:08:04.760 --> 0:08:08.400
<v Speaker 1>or unfavorable ratings of the Department of Homeland Security. You

0:08:08.440 --> 0:08:10.880
<v Speaker 1>have sixty eight percent of Republicans viewing it favorably, just

0:08:10.920 --> 0:08:14.679
<v Speaker 1>twenty six percent of Democrats view it favorably. Last year,

0:08:14.960 --> 0:08:18.520
<v Speaker 1>Democrats were more likely than Republicans to rate DHS favorably.

0:08:19.200 --> 0:08:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Partisan gap on ICE is wider there than under any

0:08:23.880 --> 0:08:27.600
<v Speaker 1>other group that was tested by Pew. Seventy two percent

0:08:27.600 --> 0:08:31.360
<v Speaker 1>of Republicans favorable, have a favorable view towards ICE seventy

0:08:31.440 --> 0:08:37.800
<v Speaker 1>two percent, twenty one percent unfavorable. In contrast, Democrats, literally

0:08:37.840 --> 0:08:40.840
<v Speaker 1>it's a mirror image, just thirteen percent of a favorable

0:08:40.880 --> 0:08:46.760
<v Speaker 1>rating of ICE, seventy eight percent unfavorable on that front,

0:08:47.800 --> 0:08:50.720
<v Speaker 1>and obviously on the FBI itself, just to give you

0:08:51.160 --> 0:08:54.280
<v Speaker 1>a sense of that, on the FBI, you still you

0:08:54.320 --> 0:08:57.000
<v Speaker 1>have a fifty four percent of Republicans have a favorable

0:08:57.080 --> 0:09:00.520
<v Speaker 1>rating of the FBI, and right now a ray of

0:09:00.520 --> 0:09:03.240
<v Speaker 1>Democrats have a favorable rating of the FBI forty five percent.

0:09:03.240 --> 0:09:09.800
<v Speaker 1>It shows you that it hasn't totally trickled down just yet. There,

0:09:10.040 --> 0:09:13.880
<v Speaker 1>For what it's worth, there actually are places where both

0:09:14.120 --> 0:09:17.080
<v Speaker 1>where there isn't a polarized view of certain federal agencies.

0:09:18.080 --> 0:09:23.720
<v Speaker 1>The National Park Service basically seventy percent of Republicans and

0:09:23.840 --> 0:09:26.480
<v Speaker 1>Democrats have a favorable view of the National Park Service.

0:09:27.120 --> 0:09:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Let's see how the dosee cuts impact that over time.

0:09:30.840 --> 0:09:33.640
<v Speaker 1>The National Weather Service has a fairly high favorable rating

0:09:33.679 --> 0:09:38.320
<v Speaker 1>sixty one percent of Republicans, seventy three percent of Democrats. Oddly,

0:09:39.080 --> 0:09:43.160
<v Speaker 1>NASA is a bit more polarized, believe it or not.

0:09:43.679 --> 0:09:47.080
<v Speaker 1>While it has a net favorable rating, more Democrats have

0:09:47.160 --> 0:09:51.280
<v Speaker 1>a higher favorable rating of NASA than Republicans. And the

0:09:51.320 --> 0:09:54.360
<v Speaker 1>Social Security Administration is a huge partisan divide, with more

0:09:54.400 --> 0:10:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Republicans having a positive view of it versus versus Democrats.

0:10:01.559 --> 0:10:04.480
<v Speaker 1>But the point is, we are living in a time

0:10:04.600 --> 0:10:08.480
<v Speaker 1>where I think most Americans, and I think correctly now

0:10:08.600 --> 0:10:16.320
<v Speaker 1>view the at least the federal law enforcement agencies through

0:10:16.840 --> 0:10:22.280
<v Speaker 1>very partisan eyes. Because they are being run by very

0:10:22.320 --> 0:10:27.680
<v Speaker 1>partisan actors who are not trying to hide their partisanship. Right,

0:10:27.960 --> 0:10:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Pambody is a Republican operative in the role of Attorney General,

0:10:32.120 --> 0:10:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Cash Bettel a Republican operative in the role of FBI director.

0:10:37.080 --> 0:10:41.080
<v Speaker 1>That's not healthy for our society. This is why there

0:10:41.280 --> 0:10:44.760
<v Speaker 1>is a real debate here if the more the president

0:10:44.840 --> 0:10:50.160
<v Speaker 1>wants to concentrate power through him in the executive branch

0:10:50.200 --> 0:10:55.080
<v Speaker 1>and control these agencies that multiple presidents left and right

0:10:55.200 --> 0:11:00.000
<v Speaker 1>believe they had to create some distance from in order

0:11:00.160 --> 0:11:03.760
<v Speaker 1>to keep credibility with these agencies, whether it is the FBI,

0:11:04.160 --> 0:11:07.640
<v Speaker 1>whether it is the Department of Justice, whether it is

0:11:07.800 --> 0:11:11.920
<v Speaker 1>the Federal Reserve. And when you concentrate all this in

0:11:12.000 --> 0:11:17.600
<v Speaker 1>moments like we're dealing with where we need where a

0:11:17.720 --> 0:11:21.760
<v Speaker 1>very political response is the last thing the situation needs,

0:11:23.160 --> 0:11:28.640
<v Speaker 1>you're going to have extraordinarily partisan actors whose first instinct

0:11:28.760 --> 0:11:35.640
<v Speaker 1>is to exploit for partisan gain, and it is only

0:11:35.720 --> 0:11:40.800
<v Speaker 1>going to erode the credibility of these agencies. Right now,

0:11:41.000 --> 0:11:49.760
<v Speaker 1>I gave you the partisan leanings here. Essentially, independence are

0:11:49.840 --> 0:11:54.240
<v Speaker 1>essentially moving there. In these cases, the Independence look slightly

0:11:54.280 --> 0:11:57.680
<v Speaker 1>more left than right as far as their ratings are concerned,

0:11:57.679 --> 0:12:00.400
<v Speaker 1>and I think independence just look at it a little

0:12:00.440 --> 0:12:03.400
<v Speaker 1>more straightforward, not necessarily through a partisan lens, but through

0:12:04.080 --> 0:12:09.480
<v Speaker 1>a reality lens. And the reality is the right believes

0:12:09.480 --> 0:12:13.160
<v Speaker 1>the left politicize these agencies, the left believes the rights

0:12:13.160 --> 0:12:17.000
<v Speaker 1>politicizing these agencies. If both sides are saying these agencies

0:12:17.040 --> 0:12:19.000
<v Speaker 1>have been politicized over the last two years, I promise

0:12:19.040 --> 0:12:21.440
<v Speaker 1>you independents are going to view that the agencies are

0:12:21.480 --> 0:12:24.520
<v Speaker 1>always being politicized, and they're going to line up essentially

0:12:24.559 --> 0:12:29.800
<v Speaker 1>against the political party and power in that one. And

0:12:29.880 --> 0:12:33.360
<v Speaker 1>I think that's the situation that we're going to see

0:12:33.400 --> 0:12:38.520
<v Speaker 1>here and let's see, let's see how political this investigation

0:12:38.640 --> 0:12:42.840
<v Speaker 1>itself gets. But this is we are dealing with a

0:12:43.120 --> 0:12:47.640
<v Speaker 1>very with a very skeptical public in general right now,

0:12:48.600 --> 0:12:53.560
<v Speaker 1>where everybody is looking at sees everything through a very

0:12:53.559 --> 0:12:56.880
<v Speaker 1>partisan lens, and in many cases that's exactly the way

0:12:56.920 --> 0:12:59.439
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump. This is a feature of the Trump administration.

0:13:00.240 --> 0:13:07.840
<v Speaker 1>They don't view They're okay, if it's seen positively only

0:13:07.880 --> 0:13:12.559
<v Speaker 1>by their voters, that is an acceptable outcome, and that's

0:13:13.120 --> 0:13:16.640
<v Speaker 1>that's I think the ultimate problem with the current situation

0:13:16.720 --> 0:13:19.319
<v Speaker 1>we're living in is that this is the first administration

0:13:19.400 --> 0:13:24.160
<v Speaker 1>that didn't care whether people that didn't vote for them

0:13:24.480 --> 0:13:28.160
<v Speaker 1>respected their ability to govern one and two whether they

0:13:28.160 --> 0:13:31.840
<v Speaker 1>ought to govern for people that didn't vote for them.

0:13:31.880 --> 0:13:37.480
<v Speaker 1>And I think this is this is unfortunately a time

0:13:37.520 --> 0:13:40.800
<v Speaker 1>where you need max trust in your law enforcement agencies,

0:13:43.120 --> 0:13:45.160
<v Speaker 1>and we are at a time where we probably are

0:13:45.200 --> 0:13:48.400
<v Speaker 1>as low as it's been probably since the nineteen seventies,

0:13:50.200 --> 0:13:54.160
<v Speaker 1>certainly has polarized on these agencies. We didn't have the

0:13:54.200 --> 0:13:57.400
<v Speaker 1>same amount of polling that we do today, and how

0:13:57.400 --> 0:14:03.360
<v Speaker 1>often would we do it. But it is nonetheless a

0:14:05.160 --> 0:14:06.840
<v Speaker 1>we're in a period of low trust. We know this

0:14:07.559 --> 0:14:13.800
<v Speaker 1>across the board, and so it is like, again, you

0:14:13.960 --> 0:14:18.920
<v Speaker 1>hope that the moment is heavy enough that even the

0:14:18.960 --> 0:14:22.080
<v Speaker 1>most partisan actor realizes this is not the time for partisanship.

0:14:24.560 --> 0:14:32.120
<v Speaker 1>But if passed his prologue, it's unlikely that your hope

0:14:32.560 --> 0:14:46.160
<v Speaker 1>is going to turn into reality. Let's get into some

0:14:46.200 --> 0:14:51.960
<v Speaker 1>asshat ask Chuck. First question comes from Jeff, and it's

0:14:52.000 --> 0:14:55.760
<v Speaker 1>a perfectly timed sports and politics question. He says, Hey, Chuck,

0:14:55.840 --> 0:14:57.920
<v Speaker 1>Jeff from Pittsburgh. Here. I just dropped off my oldest

0:14:57.920 --> 0:15:00.600
<v Speaker 1>son off for his first year at university. He has

0:15:00.640 --> 0:15:03.480
<v Speaker 1>a great interest in journalism, particularly sports and politics. Hey,

0:15:03.640 --> 0:15:05.880
<v Speaker 1>that's familiar to me, But my fear as a parent

0:15:05.960 --> 0:15:08.520
<v Speaker 1>is naturally the dying legacy of legacy outlets. I've heard

0:15:08.560 --> 0:15:10.480
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned in passing on the podcast about how local

0:15:10.480 --> 0:15:13.360
<v Speaker 1>sports coverage may have the potential to transform, support other

0:15:13.400 --> 0:15:16.360
<v Speaker 1>local coverage, or remake the media landscape. Can you elaborate

0:15:16.400 --> 0:15:21.600
<v Speaker 1>on this? Yes, Look, I've been examining the local news

0:15:21.680 --> 0:15:27.880
<v Speaker 1>landscape for quite some time through a variety of potential

0:15:27.880 --> 0:15:30.960
<v Speaker 1>business proposals. For one, I'm going to keep some of

0:15:31.000 --> 0:15:34.480
<v Speaker 1>it a bit cryptic on that, but here's the basic premise.

0:15:35.320 --> 0:15:39.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, local news they had two main revenue streams

0:15:39.520 --> 0:15:43.920
<v Speaker 1>for a long time, right advertised, well, three main revenue streams, advertising,

0:15:44.400 --> 0:15:48.720
<v Speaker 1>subscriptions and classified. And it was really classified that were

0:15:48.760 --> 0:15:52.080
<v Speaker 1>the sort of the reliable revenue generator. ADS. ADS would

0:15:52.080 --> 0:15:55.880
<v Speaker 1>go up and down, if you will, and even like subscriptions,

0:15:56.360 --> 0:15:59.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, yes that mattered, but in some cases it

0:16:00.200 --> 0:16:02.520
<v Speaker 1>wasn't you know, you know, they were just dying to

0:16:02.520 --> 0:16:03.880
<v Speaker 1>make sure you got the pay. You know, it was

0:16:03.960 --> 0:16:07.240
<v Speaker 1>more important for them to have higher circulation numbers to

0:16:07.360 --> 0:16:11.720
<v Speaker 1>sell to advertisers than it was necessarily to get direct

0:16:12.040 --> 0:16:18.840
<v Speaker 1>subscription income revenue from each household. So that's why I've

0:16:18.840 --> 0:16:22.080
<v Speaker 1>always looked at it more as two primary primary resources there.

0:16:23.240 --> 0:16:25.600
<v Speaker 1>And you know, as i've you may have heard me

0:16:25.640 --> 0:16:27.840
<v Speaker 1>say this on this podcast, I say it wherever I go.

0:16:27.920 --> 0:16:31.440
<v Speaker 1>I said, a man named Craig decided classified zuta be free. YadA,

0:16:31.520 --> 0:16:35.880
<v Speaker 1>YadA YadA, Donald Trump became president. Because what happened is,

0:16:35.960 --> 0:16:39.520
<v Speaker 1>I do think when we knocked out local and classified,

0:16:39.560 --> 0:16:42.720
<v Speaker 1>when when you got rid of classified revenue for basically

0:16:42.760 --> 0:16:45.560
<v Speaker 1>any news newspaper that had a circulation of fifty thousand

0:16:45.600 --> 0:16:48.560
<v Speaker 1>or less, that was sixty to seventy percent of their revenue.

0:16:49.480 --> 0:16:52.200
<v Speaker 1>So look, let me speed through this part, which is

0:16:53.440 --> 0:16:56.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't think nonprofit is a way to is a

0:16:56.240 --> 0:16:59.120
<v Speaker 1>long term solution to the local news crisis that we

0:16:59.120 --> 0:17:03.200
<v Speaker 1>have in America. Uh So, I think that you got

0:17:03.240 --> 0:17:06.480
<v Speaker 1>to find a revenue stream. And I actually think the

0:17:06.640 --> 0:17:09.600
<v Speaker 1>fact that for all the reasons I just talked about

0:17:09.600 --> 0:17:12.080
<v Speaker 1>in this episode about how much money is coming into college,

0:17:13.240 --> 0:17:15.640
<v Speaker 1>how much money is being poured into high school sports

0:17:15.680 --> 0:17:18.399
<v Speaker 1>to prepare to get your opportunity in college now and

0:17:18.440 --> 0:17:21.400
<v Speaker 1>this is no longer just about basketball and football. This

0:17:21.480 --> 0:17:26.600
<v Speaker 1>is across the board, right beach volleyball, lacrosse, both men's

0:17:26.600 --> 0:17:31.200
<v Speaker 1>and women's soccer, both men's and women's women's softball, even

0:17:31.240 --> 0:17:34.440
<v Speaker 1>men's baseball in some places is a net positive revenue

0:17:34.440 --> 0:17:39.920
<v Speaker 1>sport and what that's going to do even as we're

0:17:39.960 --> 0:17:43.560
<v Speaker 1>at this weird demographic cliff where we were actually stagnant

0:17:43.640 --> 0:17:49.400
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to to growth of the under seventeen generation,

0:17:49.560 --> 0:17:51.679
<v Speaker 1>Like you know, universities have been talking about this that

0:17:51.760 --> 0:17:56.840
<v Speaker 1>this was the beginning of this demographic cliff where we

0:17:57.520 --> 0:17:59.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, and then you throw in that we're a

0:17:59.560 --> 0:18:02.840
<v Speaker 1>little more restrictive on immigration, so are we are? We

0:18:02.880 --> 0:18:05.960
<v Speaker 1>are getting older as a country, not younger. But when

0:18:05.960 --> 0:18:10.359
<v Speaker 1>it comes to youth sports, it's primarily been pretty boy heavy,

0:18:10.400 --> 0:18:12.840
<v Speaker 1>and I think now with the amount of opportunity in

0:18:13.160 --> 0:18:17.160
<v Speaker 1>women's sports, you're going to see gender parity among youth sports.

0:18:18.040 --> 0:18:20.480
<v Speaker 1>So it is going it is a huge growth area

0:18:21.080 --> 0:18:22.959
<v Speaker 1>and there is just a ton of money. And I

0:18:23.000 --> 0:18:25.840
<v Speaker 1>think if a way you're trying to build a local

0:18:25.880 --> 0:18:30.959
<v Speaker 1>news organization, and I've I've there are some good examples

0:18:30.960 --> 0:18:33.720
<v Speaker 1>that I've come across in my research of the local

0:18:33.760 --> 0:18:39.840
<v Speaker 1>news ecosystem that local sports is a pretty good uh

0:18:40.000 --> 0:18:43.320
<v Speaker 1>magnet to get readers to get people interested in what

0:18:43.359 --> 0:18:47.280
<v Speaker 1>you're doing. And if you can become in the same way, right,

0:18:47.320 --> 0:18:50.359
<v Speaker 1>then my friends at NBC through a bunch of money

0:18:50.359 --> 0:18:53.119
<v Speaker 1>to get the NBA because in there and you know,

0:18:53.200 --> 0:18:55.639
<v Speaker 1>live sports during the week is sort of one of

0:18:55.680 --> 0:18:58.919
<v Speaker 1>these last ways you can get people to turn on

0:18:59.000 --> 0:19:01.439
<v Speaker 1>a legacy TV each It's the same thing in local

0:19:02.320 --> 0:19:05.440
<v Speaker 1>if you can become the hub and I believe if

0:19:05.440 --> 0:19:08.719
<v Speaker 1>you can become the local hub of how the community

0:19:08.880 --> 0:19:14.080
<v Speaker 1>watches the local high school football game or watches the

0:19:14.160 --> 0:19:17.040
<v Speaker 1>twelve you travel teams in your community play each other,

0:19:18.200 --> 0:19:20.520
<v Speaker 1>and maybe you put that behind a paywall, but you

0:19:20.640 --> 0:19:24.840
<v Speaker 1>also are creating a friendly or advertising environment. Small businesses

0:19:24.960 --> 0:19:29.000
<v Speaker 1>love being associated with youth sports. Right. It's not polarizing

0:19:29.720 --> 0:19:33.159
<v Speaker 1>as a as somebody who cares about trying to glue

0:19:33.280 --> 0:19:36.680
<v Speaker 1>communities back together between red and blue. I think sports

0:19:36.760 --> 0:19:39.040
<v Speaker 1>is one of the safe zones that you can do

0:19:39.119 --> 0:19:42.000
<v Speaker 1>that with. You can if you start with sports, you

0:19:42.040 --> 0:19:45.280
<v Speaker 1>build your trust that way, and then over time you

0:19:45.320 --> 0:19:47.520
<v Speaker 1>can build trust with them and then eventually they will

0:19:47.520 --> 0:19:49.040
<v Speaker 1>believe you when you say and oh, by the way,

0:19:49.080 --> 0:19:50.919
<v Speaker 1>we're also doing this reporting over here to tell you

0:19:50.920 --> 0:19:55.600
<v Speaker 1>that your city councilman's corrupt. So that's the that's that's

0:19:55.720 --> 0:20:02.880
<v Speaker 1>my that's my thesis, and it's one I've put together

0:20:02.920 --> 0:20:05.680
<v Speaker 1>in a business plan and it's one I really believe in.

0:20:06.080 --> 0:20:08.439
<v Speaker 1>I know this the youth sports world is going to

0:20:08.480 --> 0:20:13.879
<v Speaker 1>be is growing, and it's growing extraordinarily fast, and it's

0:20:13.920 --> 0:20:16.240
<v Speaker 1>only going to get bigger, and there's a whole bunch

0:20:16.240 --> 0:20:19.439
<v Speaker 1>of people wanting to invest money in it. There's not

0:20:19.480 --> 0:20:21.600
<v Speaker 1>as many people that want to invest money in local news.

0:20:21.640 --> 0:20:24.199
<v Speaker 1>They've sort of almost written it off, thinking, oh, it

0:20:24.200 --> 0:20:26.720
<v Speaker 1>should be just a project of nonprofit. Well, I'm not

0:20:26.760 --> 0:20:29.360
<v Speaker 1>ready to write it off, and I'm like, can we

0:20:29.400 --> 0:20:33.560
<v Speaker 1>marry these two entities if you will right? Ultimately, you

0:20:33.680 --> 0:20:38.280
<v Speaker 1>need a local publisher to let you know that the

0:20:38.560 --> 0:20:42.360
<v Speaker 1>youth sports tree fell in the forest and here's the scores,

0:20:42.400 --> 0:20:45.600
<v Speaker 1>and somebody's got to deal with the infrastructure to make

0:20:45.600 --> 0:20:48.520
<v Speaker 1>sure the stream lives somewhere and you can have a

0:20:48.520 --> 0:20:51.960
<v Speaker 1>place to see the highlights, etc. So I just think

0:20:51.960 --> 0:20:55.000
<v Speaker 1>that this is one of these things where it's when,

0:20:55.280 --> 0:20:58.480
<v Speaker 1>if you will right, we can rebuild a more trusted

0:20:58.520 --> 0:21:03.600
<v Speaker 1>local ecosystem and oh, by the way, we're providing a

0:21:03.640 --> 0:21:07.679
<v Speaker 1>service to the community. That it really wants. Trust me,

0:21:07.720 --> 0:21:10.159
<v Speaker 1>as a parent of two kids that were pretty active

0:21:10.160 --> 0:21:13.480
<v Speaker 1>in the youth sports space, five or six different apps

0:21:13.640 --> 0:21:16.200
<v Speaker 1>you'd run late you didn't want to miss an app bat,

0:21:16.800 --> 0:21:20.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, towards the end of their youth sports careers.

0:21:21.080 --> 0:21:23.560
<v Speaker 1>There'd be the occasional parent that says, hey, I've created

0:21:23.600 --> 0:21:26.679
<v Speaker 1>a live stream, go to this what was it Vimeo?

0:21:27.000 --> 0:21:28.960
<v Speaker 1>I think is the Mayo. I don't know if I've

0:21:29.000 --> 0:21:32.800
<v Speaker 1>said it right, and you could kind of watch it

0:21:32.880 --> 0:21:35.879
<v Speaker 1>and all this stuff. So I do think this is

0:21:35.920 --> 0:21:38.399
<v Speaker 1>actually and it goes back to what I believe a

0:21:38.480 --> 0:21:42.359
<v Speaker 1>successful local news publication has to be, which is a

0:21:42.400 --> 0:21:47.240
<v Speaker 1>service journalism, meaning you really are in service to the community.

0:21:47.280 --> 0:21:49.399
<v Speaker 1>You're helping people in the community live their lives. So

0:21:49.800 --> 0:21:52.440
<v Speaker 1>one part of that is making it easier for them

0:21:52.480 --> 0:21:55.080
<v Speaker 1>to keep up with the youth sports scene. But another

0:21:55.200 --> 0:21:57.760
<v Speaker 1>might be you hire an influencer who's just there to

0:21:57.800 --> 0:22:01.439
<v Speaker 1>help you save money on food. They keep track of,

0:22:01.640 --> 0:22:03.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, the price of chicken on everywhere, the price

0:22:03.600 --> 0:22:06.600
<v Speaker 1>of eggs, and what restaurant makes it easier to take

0:22:06.760 --> 0:22:10.560
<v Speaker 1>two small children to go out and not break the bank,

0:22:10.640 --> 0:22:14.600
<v Speaker 1>et cetera. Right, you essentially recreate the old As I say,

0:22:14.800 --> 0:22:17.920
<v Speaker 1>you're recreating what everybody loved about the newspaper bundle. Right.

0:22:18.080 --> 0:22:20.360
<v Speaker 1>I've always said this about the old newspaper. We all

0:22:20.400 --> 0:22:22.680
<v Speaker 1>got it, but only ten percent of it cared about

0:22:22.680 --> 0:22:26.160
<v Speaker 1>the news part. The other ninety percent had something else

0:22:26.160 --> 0:22:28.960
<v Speaker 1>we had in there. It was just a terrific bundle. Well,

0:22:29.119 --> 0:22:31.480
<v Speaker 1>you start to unpack that bundle and say, what is

0:22:31.520 --> 0:22:33.560
<v Speaker 1>it that helped you know? So you need to find

0:22:33.560 --> 0:22:35.199
<v Speaker 1>out what's going on in your community. You need to

0:22:35.240 --> 0:22:37.119
<v Speaker 1>find out how to save money in your community. You

0:22:37.119 --> 0:22:39.840
<v Speaker 1>need to find out what's the weather in my area

0:22:39.960 --> 0:22:41.919
<v Speaker 1>going to be, not just on the other side of

0:22:41.920 --> 0:22:45.960
<v Speaker 1>the county. Well, my goodness, weather forecasting has never been more.

0:22:46.359 --> 0:22:49.200
<v Speaker 1>The only good local news the Washington Post does anymore

0:22:49.359 --> 0:22:51.879
<v Speaker 1>is its weather in Capital Weather Gang. Because of the

0:22:51.920 --> 0:22:55.840
<v Speaker 1>ability to micro forecast, they literally can have pretty accurate

0:22:55.840 --> 0:23:01.000
<v Speaker 1>forecasts of my neighborhood and the neighborhoo next door and

0:23:01.080 --> 0:23:05.520
<v Speaker 1>be correct it is it is, and so every community.

0:23:05.560 --> 0:23:08.280
<v Speaker 1>If I were running a local news operation, whether it's

0:23:08.280 --> 0:23:13.040
<v Speaker 1>in Pittsburgh, Kansas or Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, I'd be hiring a

0:23:13.080 --> 0:23:17.119
<v Speaker 1>local meteorologist. By the way, my daughter's minoring and meteorology,

0:23:18.320 --> 0:23:20.840
<v Speaker 1>so she needs a job too. And one other thing

0:23:21.119 --> 0:23:28.600
<v Speaker 1>to sort of alleviate you your concern about about journalism

0:23:28.600 --> 0:23:31.600
<v Speaker 1>as a career for your for your for your son.

0:23:33.520 --> 0:23:38.000
<v Speaker 1>When I entered the information ecosystem, space journalism, whatever we

0:23:38.040 --> 0:23:40.479
<v Speaker 1>want to call it anymore, in the early nineties, it

0:23:40.520 --> 0:23:44.320
<v Speaker 1>was at a time of media contraction. But there was

0:23:44.359 --> 0:23:47.800
<v Speaker 1>a whole bunch of startups, and I got a whole

0:23:47.840 --> 0:23:51.760
<v Speaker 1>bunch of early experience and startups where the old legacy

0:23:51.800 --> 0:23:55.439
<v Speaker 1>reporters didn't want to bother understanding what the internet was.

0:23:55.680 --> 0:23:59.560
<v Speaker 1>And at twenty three, because I was comfortable on the internet,

0:23:59.720 --> 0:24:02.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, I you know, had an early political column.

0:24:02.480 --> 0:24:04.600
<v Speaker 1>I was doing analysis on the days, all because the

0:24:04.640 --> 0:24:07.520
<v Speaker 1>old legacy reporters didn't want to do it. So what

0:24:07.520 --> 0:24:10.919
<v Speaker 1>I would say is that if there's ever an exciting

0:24:11.000 --> 0:24:14.320
<v Speaker 1>time to be in in the world of journalism, it's

0:24:14.320 --> 0:24:16.840
<v Speaker 1>when you're in your twenties, not when you're like me

0:24:16.880 --> 0:24:19.560
<v Speaker 1>in your fifties. And here's one other way to give

0:24:19.600 --> 0:24:21.720
<v Speaker 1>you some to give you a little bit more comfort

0:24:22.119 --> 0:24:25.040
<v Speaker 1>that this isn't a wasted degree for your for your son,

0:24:25.920 --> 0:24:29.719
<v Speaker 1>more and more Fortune five hundred. There is now this

0:24:29.800 --> 0:24:32.200
<v Speaker 1>belief in the in the in the corporate world that

0:24:33.359 --> 0:24:36.240
<v Speaker 1>you've got to run your own communications. This isn't just

0:24:36.320 --> 0:24:39.119
<v Speaker 1>about finding a media outlet that will be friendly to

0:24:39.200 --> 0:24:41.440
<v Speaker 1>you when you roll out your new logo or your

0:24:41.480 --> 0:24:45.399
<v Speaker 1>new this. You've got to create your own content. And

0:24:45.560 --> 0:24:48.080
<v Speaker 1>more and more Fortune five hundred companies want to be

0:24:48.119 --> 0:24:52.920
<v Speaker 1>their own publishers. They're setting up comm shops that look

0:24:53.000 --> 0:24:59.000
<v Speaker 1>more like newsrooms than they are just marketing material, and

0:24:59.200 --> 0:25:01.480
<v Speaker 1>so there is a actually a demand. There's quite a

0:25:01.520 --> 0:25:04.240
<v Speaker 1>few of my former colleagues are going into the corporate

0:25:04.280 --> 0:25:10.760
<v Speaker 1>world to essentially set up be a news newsletter publisher,

0:25:11.040 --> 0:25:14.639
<v Speaker 1>or be a content creator for their TikTok page, or

0:25:14.680 --> 0:25:20.119
<v Speaker 1>to set up podcasts, you know, maybe a weekly podcast

0:25:20.160 --> 0:25:22.000
<v Speaker 1>that the CEO is a part of, or that they

0:25:22.040 --> 0:25:27.280
<v Speaker 1>do for communication. So I think that the while the

0:25:27.400 --> 0:25:30.000
<v Speaker 1>narrow when you look at the world of journalism through

0:25:30.000 --> 0:25:32.280
<v Speaker 1>the narrow lens of sort of what we thought of

0:25:32.280 --> 0:25:36.040
<v Speaker 1>as journalism twenty years ago, it looks like a shrinking field.

0:25:36.080 --> 0:25:40.240
<v Speaker 1>When you look at it through the prism of communications

0:25:40.920 --> 0:25:45.320
<v Speaker 1>and managing media, well, then suddenly the same skills are

0:25:45.359 --> 0:25:49.399
<v Speaker 1>necessary and many more entities want to hire people with

0:25:49.480 --> 0:25:54.400
<v Speaker 1>this skill set. So I think it's a I think

0:25:54.440 --> 0:25:58.719
<v Speaker 1>there's more opportunity than you realize. So I, you know,

0:25:58.960 --> 0:26:01.280
<v Speaker 1>I want to make you feel better Jeff that this

0:26:01.359 --> 0:26:05.359
<v Speaker 1>is I get it. But if you sort of sort

0:26:05.359 --> 0:26:10.399
<v Speaker 1>of what is it? Widen your aperture here of what is?

0:26:10.760 --> 0:26:15.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, the traditional jobs are gone, but there are

0:26:16.119 --> 0:26:20.080
<v Speaker 1>suddenly a lot of other opportunities that also exist where

0:26:20.119 --> 0:26:23.800
<v Speaker 1>getting this journalism degree is going to be an asset

0:26:24.240 --> 0:26:29.920
<v Speaker 1>not a liability, I promise. Okay. Next question comes from Bobs.

0:26:30.160 --> 0:26:32.879
<v Speaker 1>A lot of smack talk here on football. Looks like

0:26:33.119 --> 0:26:34.840
<v Speaker 1>I've been a long time listening to your podcast, always

0:26:34.880 --> 0:26:36.840
<v Speaker 1>enjoyed your work on me the Press. I'm listening in

0:26:36.880 --> 0:26:38.720
<v Speaker 1>listening to your most recent podcast has struck me that

0:26:38.720 --> 0:26:41.119
<v Speaker 1>two of your favorite sport teams sports teams happen to

0:26:41.160 --> 0:26:42.879
<v Speaker 1>be playing two of my favorite sports teams in their

0:26:42.920 --> 0:26:45.440
<v Speaker 1>opening games. That said, let me make these predictions. Notre

0:26:45.480 --> 0:26:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Dame beats Miami in a close game. Detroit's Bank screen Bay. Thanks.

0:26:49.280 --> 0:26:51.159
<v Speaker 1>Should these results come to fruition, I just hope it

0:26:51.160 --> 0:26:53.639
<v Speaker 1>will not impact your excellent commentary in the ensuing days,

0:26:53.760 --> 0:26:56.280
<v Speaker 1>nor teint the remainder of their respective schedules. Except for

0:26:56.320 --> 0:26:59.240
<v Speaker 1>Green Bay second less to Detroit on Thanksgiving, compounding any

0:26:59.480 --> 0:27:02.360
<v Speaker 1>gastro and testinal issues for Green Bay fans that day. Hey,

0:27:02.400 --> 0:27:04.240
<v Speaker 1>by the way, that game's at noon, so it's actually

0:27:04.240 --> 0:27:08.320
<v Speaker 1>before you start totally consuming too much food. Trust me,

0:27:08.359 --> 0:27:10.920
<v Speaker 1>my son and I have already noted what time those

0:27:10.920 --> 0:27:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Thanksgiving games are. Cheers, Go Irish, go Lions. Appreciate that, Bob,

0:27:16.520 --> 0:27:20.639
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna love this. My son's roommate, he knew his

0:27:20.680 --> 0:27:22.560
<v Speaker 1>roommate a little bit, but he didn't know his roommate

0:27:22.600 --> 0:27:26.160
<v Speaker 1>really well. His roommate moved in the day before, and

0:27:27.640 --> 0:27:30.239
<v Speaker 1>when we go into the room, the first thing we

0:27:30.280 --> 0:27:34.160
<v Speaker 1>see is this Lion's flag all taped up on the wall.

0:27:34.200 --> 0:27:37.680
<v Speaker 1>And I was like, oh man, and my son brought

0:27:37.680 --> 0:27:39.840
<v Speaker 1>to Jordan love Jersey, but he didn't bring up the

0:27:39.920 --> 0:27:46.120
<v Speaker 1>packer flag. So of course I have I am win

0:27:46.200 --> 0:27:48.919
<v Speaker 1>on Amazon quickly to order him a packer flag so

0:27:49.080 --> 0:27:52.320
<v Speaker 1>he could have some he could have, hey, and some

0:27:52.400 --> 0:27:57.520
<v Speaker 1>fun and fun little Miami news. My son ran into

0:27:57.520 --> 0:28:00.479
<v Speaker 1>Tyler van Dyke. If you're an old school her Knees fan,

0:28:00.560 --> 0:28:02.119
<v Speaker 1>or if at least been following them from more than

0:28:02.160 --> 0:28:08.159
<v Speaker 1>the last twenty four last year, Tyler van Dyke was

0:28:08.160 --> 0:28:12.040
<v Speaker 1>was had sort of six great games for Miami a

0:28:12.080 --> 0:28:14.320
<v Speaker 1>few years back, and there was some thought that maybe

0:28:15.280 --> 0:28:17.600
<v Speaker 1>in Manny Dias his last year, that maybe he could

0:28:17.600 --> 0:28:20.879
<v Speaker 1>get us over the finish line. He didn't. But his

0:28:21.000 --> 0:28:24.359
<v Speaker 1>best years at Miami were when Rhet Lashley was the

0:28:24.359 --> 0:28:26.600
<v Speaker 1>offensive coordinator. Well, Rhet last he's now the head coach

0:28:26.600 --> 0:28:30.760
<v Speaker 1>at SMU, and Tyler Van Dyke is playing his last

0:28:30.840 --> 0:28:33.920
<v Speaker 1>season right now, he's the backup at SMU. My son

0:28:34.000 --> 0:28:36.439
<v Speaker 1>ran into him, recognized him, and he couldn't have been nicer,

0:28:36.800 --> 0:28:41.320
<v Speaker 1>couldn't have been you know, So's like, Wow, I'm eighteen

0:28:41.360 --> 0:28:43.320
<v Speaker 1>and he's a grown man. He goes, I just felt

0:28:43.320 --> 0:28:45.400
<v Speaker 1>like I believe we're both students at SMU was sort

0:28:45.400 --> 0:28:48.600
<v Speaker 1>of his reaction. But if Tyler, for whatever reason, if

0:28:48.600 --> 0:28:53.400
<v Speaker 1>you're listening, I really appreciate how great you were to

0:28:53.520 --> 0:29:00.440
<v Speaker 1>your fellow SMU Mustang freshman there, So thank you for that.

0:29:01.240 --> 0:29:04.400
<v Speaker 1>Next question comes from Brian in Massachusetts, second time writer here. Recently,

0:29:04.440 --> 0:29:06.960
<v Speaker 1>you said that Marco Rubio was one of the only

0:29:07.000 --> 0:29:09.040
<v Speaker 1>adults in the room, Bessen being the other. Have you

0:29:09.120 --> 0:29:11.880
<v Speaker 1>heard if Rubio has any regrets or is embarrassed his

0:29:11.920 --> 0:29:14.720
<v Speaker 1>body language tends to say so, but when he's interviewed,

0:29:14.720 --> 0:29:16.440
<v Speaker 1>he sounds trumpy. I was never a big fan of his,

0:29:16.520 --> 0:29:19.880
<v Speaker 1>but this feels like when Hulkogan became a bad guy.

0:29:20.240 --> 0:29:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Brian from track at Massachusetts. I'll tell you. Look, I

0:29:28.080 --> 0:29:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Marco Rubio and I grew up. Both grew up in Miami.

0:29:32.960 --> 0:29:35.959
<v Speaker 1>Think he graduated the year after me or a year

0:29:36.000 --> 0:29:38.000
<v Speaker 1>before me, I can't quite remember. I think he graduated

0:29:38.040 --> 0:29:39.600
<v Speaker 1>from South Miami High School. I went to kill And

0:29:39.640 --> 0:29:44.280
<v Speaker 1>High School. His football coach was an old family friend

0:29:44.280 --> 0:29:46.360
<v Speaker 1>of mine. So we've but we didn't know each other

0:29:46.400 --> 0:29:51.880
<v Speaker 1>back then. And I'm not gonna but there's certainly we

0:29:52.000 --> 0:29:53.880
<v Speaker 1>know a lot of people who know each other type

0:29:53.880 --> 0:29:56.640
<v Speaker 1>of mindset. Right. It's a you know, like any like

0:29:56.680 --> 0:29:58.680
<v Speaker 1>any community, it can feel like a small town. The

0:29:58.720 --> 0:30:04.640
<v Speaker 1>more you get to know people, it's a riddle. It's

0:30:04.680 --> 0:30:08.400
<v Speaker 1>a riddle on Rubio. I will say this. I think

0:30:08.440 --> 0:30:13.080
<v Speaker 1>that I look every time I see the administration be

0:30:13.240 --> 0:30:17.200
<v Speaker 1>surprisingly supportive of Ukraine, I think, oh, Rubio had a

0:30:17.200 --> 0:30:19.760
<v Speaker 1>good day getting to Trump, And when I see then

0:30:19.800 --> 0:30:22.840
<v Speaker 1>Trump going the other way, it's like, oh, Rubio wasn't

0:30:22.840 --> 0:30:26.560
<v Speaker 1>there today. Vance had the presidents here on that stuff.

0:30:26.680 --> 0:30:33.520
<v Speaker 1>So look, I don't know where you know, Ruby is

0:30:33.520 --> 0:30:36.440
<v Speaker 1>not the only one. There's a lot of Republicans who

0:30:36.520 --> 0:30:40.280
<v Speaker 1>have expressed discomfort over the years, some of them publicly

0:30:40.920 --> 0:30:43.800
<v Speaker 1>who have since acquiesced, some of them privately who have

0:30:43.920 --> 0:30:48.760
<v Speaker 1>never gone public. I look at some of the things

0:30:49.560 --> 0:30:54.560
<v Speaker 1>that happened, you know, I can't believe the the irresponsibility

0:30:54.560 --> 0:30:59.680
<v Speaker 1>of confirming Robert F. Kennedy Junior to HHS. I got it.

0:30:59.760 --> 0:31:02.400
<v Speaker 1>I got to think there are some well, I know

0:31:02.520 --> 0:31:05.400
<v Speaker 1>there are at least two or three Republican Senators who

0:31:05.400 --> 0:31:09.640
<v Speaker 1>regret their vote. But you know, the confirmations of Patel,

0:31:10.080 --> 0:31:16.360
<v Speaker 1>hag Seth, Gabbert, and Kennedy are probably for the most

0:31:16.400 --> 0:31:20.360
<v Speaker 1>irresponsible ones that we've seen the Senate do, and there

0:31:20.360 --> 0:31:23.080
<v Speaker 1>were a majority against them. What they were afraid of

0:31:23.120 --> 0:31:25.560
<v Speaker 1>going public? You know, if there had been secret ballots,

0:31:25.560 --> 0:31:27.600
<v Speaker 1>none of those four in the Senate, none of those

0:31:27.600 --> 0:31:30.680
<v Speaker 1>four get confirmed, not a single one of those four

0:31:30.720 --> 0:31:34.360
<v Speaker 1>that I just mentioned, only because it's on the public record.

0:31:35.320 --> 0:31:37.920
<v Speaker 1>And in some ways that's why you noticed there's always

0:31:37.920 --> 0:31:40.360
<v Speaker 1>a move to try to make certain things more public

0:31:40.520 --> 0:31:43.880
<v Speaker 1>because it is harder to say no to the president

0:31:43.960 --> 0:31:45.440
<v Speaker 1>when you have to do so in public it is

0:31:45.480 --> 0:31:48.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot easier if you can somehow stop him without

0:31:48.720 --> 0:31:52.160
<v Speaker 1>having to publicly go after him and do that. But

0:31:52.240 --> 0:31:57.479
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna look, I played the what is Rubio

0:31:57.560 --> 0:32:02.000
<v Speaker 1>really thinking game for a few years during the second

0:32:02.000 --> 0:32:09.240
<v Speaker 1>half of term one. I have retired that part of

0:32:09.280 --> 0:32:17.680
<v Speaker 1>my part of my obsession over there, and so it

0:32:17.800 --> 0:32:22.000
<v Speaker 1>is you know, look, I do think that on his

0:32:22.080 --> 0:32:25.600
<v Speaker 1>foreign policy issues, that when it comes to Latin America,

0:32:25.760 --> 0:32:29.960
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to America's national security, that he does

0:32:30.080 --> 0:32:33.120
<v Speaker 1>have some deeply held beliefs, and it does seem to

0:32:33.160 --> 0:32:37.760
<v Speaker 1>me that he tries to not throw away all of

0:32:37.800 --> 0:32:43.160
<v Speaker 1>those beliefs in service to Trump. But he has certainly

0:32:43.240 --> 0:32:45.840
<v Speaker 1>proven to be a I guess the polite way would

0:32:45.840 --> 0:32:50.040
<v Speaker 1>be calling it flexible when it comes to what he

0:32:50.120 --> 0:32:52.640
<v Speaker 1>used to define what he wants to find is conservative

0:32:52.680 --> 0:32:56.280
<v Speaker 1>and what he embraces his conservatism today. But I do

0:32:56.360 --> 0:33:01.720
<v Speaker 1>think he is ecstatic to sit there and be in

0:33:01.720 --> 0:33:04.600
<v Speaker 1>in some ways, to be compartmentalized as the foreign policy guy,

0:33:05.920 --> 0:33:10.360
<v Speaker 1>because let's just say, I think even Senator Rubio would

0:33:10.360 --> 0:33:13.320
<v Speaker 1>have spoken out against taking a piece of intel, and

0:33:13.400 --> 0:33:16.440
<v Speaker 1>I think he would have been, like you knows, as

0:33:16.480 --> 0:33:22.640
<v Speaker 1>the son of exiles, Cuban exiles, nationalizing the idea of

0:33:22.920 --> 0:33:26.960
<v Speaker 1>any sort of government control of a company is something

0:33:27.080 --> 0:33:32.400
<v Speaker 1>that is that that that many a true sort of

0:33:32.440 --> 0:33:36.240
<v Speaker 1>anti Castro Cuban exile would just find appalling and be

0:33:36.520 --> 0:33:39.920
<v Speaker 1>very concerned that it was a slippery slope to Latin

0:33:39.960 --> 0:33:43.320
<v Speaker 1>American style authoritarianism. And in fact it's funny. I have

0:33:44.200 --> 0:33:46.520
<v Speaker 1>I've actually been thinking about that I've been putting together.

0:33:47.040 --> 0:33:49.560
<v Speaker 1>I haven't, I haven't, and it's not quite ready, it's

0:33:49.600 --> 0:33:53.440
<v Speaker 1>not quite ready to debut here on the pod. But

0:33:54.520 --> 0:33:58.000
<v Speaker 1>there are a number of similarities here to sort of

0:33:58.040 --> 0:34:02.200
<v Speaker 1>what we've seen in South America, for whether it's in Venezuela,

0:34:02.280 --> 0:34:06.360
<v Speaker 1>whether it's in Argentina, frankly, whether it's in Bolivia, whether

0:34:06.360 --> 0:34:09.759
<v Speaker 1>it's in Mexico. But you're seeing certain certain things that

0:34:09.800 --> 0:34:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Trump is doing that we've seen in countries where we

0:34:15.760 --> 0:34:21.360
<v Speaker 1>have said democracy is backsliding. All right, next question, um, like,

0:34:21.440 --> 0:34:22.919
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to try to sneak in two more here

0:34:23.600 --> 0:34:25.800
<v Speaker 1>on Georgia Show on Georgia Show on me Press and

0:34:25.880 --> 0:34:27.640
<v Speaker 1>was delighted to join your podcast. Two things I want

0:34:27.680 --> 0:34:29.440
<v Speaker 1>to follow up on One, where can I find a

0:34:29.440 --> 0:34:34.839
<v Speaker 1>book or publication that explains voting trends by generations. I'm

0:34:34.840 --> 0:34:36.440
<v Speaker 1>a baby boomer and want to understand the number of

0:34:36.480 --> 0:34:38.160
<v Speaker 1>voters it turned out and the results of voting in

0:34:38.200 --> 0:34:40.560
<v Speaker 1>this country since Kennedy, that is, when I was able

0:34:40.560 --> 0:34:42.399
<v Speaker 1>to vote. He died before I could vote for him.

0:34:42.680 --> 0:34:45.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm hungry for better world news. Oh number two, I'm

0:34:45.280 --> 0:34:47.239
<v Speaker 1>hungry for better world news. You mentioned a publication that

0:34:47.239 --> 0:34:49.680
<v Speaker 1>shares more information. Will you share that with me? Please?

0:34:49.719 --> 0:34:53.240
<v Speaker 1>Thank you very much, Keep up, keep up, keep making

0:34:53.360 --> 0:34:56.360
<v Speaker 1>us think, Barbara Jane, thank you, Barbara for both of

0:34:56.400 --> 0:34:59.759
<v Speaker 1>those questions. You know, there's not really one publication on

0:34:59.800 --> 0:35:03.960
<v Speaker 1>the on the generational voting patterns. This is I don't

0:35:03.960 --> 0:35:06.520
<v Speaker 1>know if you may be reacting to the conversation I

0:35:06.560 --> 0:35:09.960
<v Speaker 1>had with Charlie Cook about our deep collections of the

0:35:10.000 --> 0:35:13.319
<v Speaker 1>omen x of American politics, because in some ways these

0:35:13.360 --> 0:35:16.320
<v Speaker 1>are things that we've we've had to do together. There

0:35:16.360 --> 0:35:23.719
<v Speaker 1>there is the Brookings Institute puts out a publication called

0:35:23.800 --> 0:35:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Vital Statistics on Congress. It does have some voting trends

0:35:28.160 --> 0:35:30.399
<v Speaker 1>in there. You can actually it looks like they now

0:35:30.480 --> 0:35:36.160
<v Speaker 1>just offer it up as a PDF download that goes through.

0:35:36.200 --> 0:35:38.880
<v Speaker 1>At least it gives you a sense of of the

0:35:38.920 --> 0:35:45.600
<v Speaker 1>shifting the shifting map of congressional seats more for Congress

0:35:45.640 --> 0:35:51.439
<v Speaker 1>than anywhere else. Congressional Quarterly used to puts out something

0:35:51.480 --> 0:35:55.000
<v Speaker 1>called Politics in America, where they've kept a more of

0:35:55.080 --> 0:35:58.000
<v Speaker 1>a of a longer. I think in the publication itself

0:35:58.040 --> 0:36:02.719
<v Speaker 1>they include the sort of longer voting trend lines on

0:36:02.760 --> 0:36:08.280
<v Speaker 1>that front. But what you're describing itself doesn't really exist

0:36:08.400 --> 0:36:11.200
<v Speaker 1>in one book form, right, I think it is. In fact,

0:36:11.239 --> 0:36:13.640
<v Speaker 1>I've been encouraging my friend John Delavope, who you may

0:36:13.680 --> 0:36:15.680
<v Speaker 1>have heard a podcast with him a couple of weeks ago.

0:36:16.239 --> 0:36:18.399
<v Speaker 1>For twenty five years he's run the Harvard Youth Poll.

0:36:18.480 --> 0:36:22.920
<v Speaker 1>So what does that mean? He has been polling basically

0:36:23.040 --> 0:36:26.560
<v Speaker 1>millennials since they were eighteen and now since they were

0:36:26.560 --> 0:36:28.880
<v Speaker 1>before eight before they were eighteen, going into college, and

0:36:28.880 --> 0:36:31.919
<v Speaker 1>now that they're heading into middle age. You know, this

0:36:31.960 --> 0:36:35.200
<v Speaker 1>is all this is twenty five years of data. I'm like, John,

0:36:35.239 --> 0:36:38.279
<v Speaker 1>You've got a book here just sort of millennials, the

0:36:39.160 --> 0:36:42.680
<v Speaker 1>next big generation, you know, in comparing them to the boomers.

0:36:44.120 --> 0:36:47.480
<v Speaker 1>So I think that there is I think that I'm

0:36:47.520 --> 0:36:51.400
<v Speaker 1>obsessed with the generation of sort of how you know,

0:36:53.360 --> 0:36:57.160
<v Speaker 1>I buy into the scholarship that says we there's basically

0:36:57.239 --> 0:37:01.840
<v Speaker 1>four types of generations, and they just kind of repeat

0:37:01.880 --> 0:37:05.239
<v Speaker 1>each repeat each other. You know, since we have about four,

0:37:05.280 --> 0:37:07.600
<v Speaker 1>I guess we're now. You know, there's always pieces of

0:37:08.120 --> 0:37:10.279
<v Speaker 1>a new generation an old generation on the on the

0:37:10.320 --> 0:37:13.320
<v Speaker 1>outer edges there. So you know, parts of six generations

0:37:13.320 --> 0:37:16.759
<v Speaker 1>are living at one time these days, because because we

0:37:16.880 --> 0:37:21.440
<v Speaker 1>keep living longer and longer on that front. But I

0:37:21.480 --> 0:37:24.680
<v Speaker 1>certainly think a good analysis of the boomers over the

0:37:24.760 --> 0:37:29.960
<v Speaker 1>years would be quite healthy. I think what you learn

0:37:31.480 --> 0:37:34.239
<v Speaker 1>is and this is what we're seeing, at least with

0:37:34.280 --> 0:37:37.879
<v Speaker 1>the millennials. They started out very liberal. They have become

0:37:38.000 --> 0:37:44.200
<v Speaker 1>less so as they've aged. Boomers have been interestingly fairly

0:37:44.280 --> 0:37:50.120
<v Speaker 1>even split the whole time. What I find interesting about

0:37:50.120 --> 0:37:52.960
<v Speaker 1>the generations is it is that you know where you

0:37:53.080 --> 0:37:56.000
<v Speaker 1>begin politically, you know, how close or far away from

0:37:56.040 --> 0:37:59.279
<v Speaker 1>the center do you begin. Usually is about what you're

0:37:59.360 --> 0:38:01.720
<v Speaker 1>coming you know, what was the politics during your coming

0:38:01.760 --> 0:38:04.799
<v Speaker 1>of age? Well, what's interesting with the boomers the coming

0:38:04.800 --> 0:38:06.680
<v Speaker 1>of age times and some it was basically in the

0:38:06.680 --> 0:38:10.680
<v Speaker 1>heart of a very polarized period of America right the sixties. Well,

0:38:10.760 --> 0:38:13.239
<v Speaker 1>here we are at the endgame of the boomers, we're

0:38:13.280 --> 0:38:16.440
<v Speaker 1>in a polarized era. We weren't as polarized in between

0:38:17.000 --> 0:38:20.040
<v Speaker 1>as much, but we were there. Millennials came in and

0:38:20.120 --> 0:38:23.879
<v Speaker 1>sort of at at a low point for the Republicans

0:38:23.920 --> 0:38:26.080
<v Speaker 1>and at a hot and it's sort of a rising point

0:38:26.360 --> 0:38:29.640
<v Speaker 1>for the Democrats with Obama, and that I think started

0:38:29.640 --> 0:38:32.640
<v Speaker 1>them further, you know, started them in a more liberal trend.

0:38:32.880 --> 0:38:36.400
<v Speaker 1>Gen X, when my coming of age Republican leadership in

0:38:36.480 --> 0:38:39.640
<v Speaker 1>this country brought about the end of the Cold War, right, Well,

0:38:39.680 --> 0:38:42.520
<v Speaker 1>guess who's the most supportive of Republicans to this day.

0:38:43.040 --> 0:38:45.880
<v Speaker 1>Of the four generations. It's not Boomers, it's not millennials,

0:38:45.920 --> 0:38:48.480
<v Speaker 1>it's Gen X. So it is interesting to me for

0:38:48.520 --> 0:38:55.480
<v Speaker 1>what it's worth is how much impact over time that

0:38:55.640 --> 0:38:58.680
<v Speaker 1>sort of first coming of age for a generation, what

0:38:59.120 --> 0:39:03.920
<v Speaker 1>the coming of age which period was politically in the country,

0:39:04.120 --> 0:39:08.359
<v Speaker 1>and how it sort of has influence on sort of

0:39:08.480 --> 0:39:12.560
<v Speaker 1>directionally how that generation votes and sort of how close

0:39:12.600 --> 0:39:15.560
<v Speaker 1>to the center will they get to or deviate dep

0:39:16.280 --> 0:39:18.839
<v Speaker 1>depending on course of where they started. All right, last

0:39:18.880 --> 0:39:22.600
<v Speaker 1>question here we are bordering on one hour of non

0:39:22.680 --> 0:39:25.799
<v Speaker 1>interview time. I want to be mindful of that. This

0:39:25.880 --> 0:39:30.600
<v Speaker 1>comes from Blaze M. And Blaze Rights. Listening to your

0:39:30.600 --> 0:39:33.160
<v Speaker 1>message about chicken at Trader Joe's got me thinking I

0:39:33.200 --> 0:39:37.800
<v Speaker 1>was recently shopping for Halloween chocolate to eat now, of course,

0:39:38.560 --> 0:39:40.560
<v Speaker 1>and realize most of what was on the shelves wasn't

0:39:40.560 --> 0:39:43.240
<v Speaker 1>actually chocolate at all, just chocolate flavored candy with barely

0:39:43.280 --> 0:39:47.239
<v Speaker 1>any cocoa didn't qualify to be labeled as chocolate. Later

0:39:47.280 --> 0:39:49.719
<v Speaker 1>that day, I noticed a store brand apple drink that

0:39:49.840 --> 0:39:52.040
<v Speaker 1>was really just apple flavored sugar water, sitting right next

0:39:52.040 --> 0:39:53.920
<v Speaker 1>to real apple juice that cost a bit more. It

0:39:53.960 --> 0:39:56.120
<v Speaker 1>makes me wonder how many people actually check the labels

0:39:56.120 --> 0:39:58.440
<v Speaker 1>and how often we're left without the option of the

0:39:58.440 --> 0:40:01.680
<v Speaker 1>real thing. That's interesting, Look, you point out something that

0:40:01.960 --> 0:40:07.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, especially especially when it comes to chocolate or

0:40:08.080 --> 0:40:11.239
<v Speaker 1>in particular. I had a lung conversation actually with Steve Moore,

0:40:11.400 --> 0:40:15.040
<v Speaker 1>conservative economists who's very friendly to Trump but at the

0:40:15.080 --> 0:40:17.960
<v Speaker 1>same time very nervous about these tariffs, and noted that, hey,

0:40:18.600 --> 0:40:23.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, all of our coffee is imported. And when

0:40:23.960 --> 0:40:25.759
<v Speaker 1>you were writing this, it made me think, how much

0:40:25.760 --> 0:40:29.040
<v Speaker 1>are we going to see coffee flavored drinks without coffee

0:40:29.040 --> 0:40:33.720
<v Speaker 1>in it because it's cheaper to make the artificial flavor.

0:40:34.480 --> 0:40:36.439
<v Speaker 1>Let's say, if it's a cold brew, or if it's

0:40:36.520 --> 0:40:40.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, you know, one of those canned lattes or whatever,

0:40:41.000 --> 0:40:46.160
<v Speaker 1>because the cost of coffee is skyrocketing, and we're also

0:40:46.160 --> 0:40:49.719
<v Speaker 1>in a we've politicized the trade war with Brazil over

0:40:50.080 --> 0:40:55.040
<v Speaker 1>over Trump's obsession over Bolsonaro there and the fact that

0:40:55.160 --> 0:40:58.600
<v Speaker 1>the Brazilian government held Bolsonaro accountable for his attempt at coup.

0:41:00.160 --> 0:41:03.800
<v Speaker 1>But all of that is contributing to just skyrocketing prices

0:41:03.880 --> 0:41:10.399
<v Speaker 1>on coffee. And so your observation is interesting, and it's

0:41:10.400 --> 0:41:14.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna make me look at chocolate. I've been ignoring chocolate

0:41:15.160 --> 0:41:17.880
<v Speaker 1>for quite some time because I you know, once you

0:41:17.920 --> 0:41:21.279
<v Speaker 1>hit Middle Ages, there are certain things that don't you know,

0:41:21.400 --> 0:41:24.120
<v Speaker 1>I like chocolate. Chocolate doesn't like me. So I've actually

0:41:24.160 --> 0:41:27.719
<v Speaker 1>not been in the market for even chocolate like substances

0:41:27.760 --> 0:41:31.120
<v Speaker 1>and sometime, but I do see a similar I'm going

0:41:31.200 --> 0:41:33.360
<v Speaker 1>to be looking for it there, and I would be

0:41:33.480 --> 0:41:37.319
<v Speaker 1>saying I think I wouldn't be surprised if we start

0:41:37.360 --> 0:41:40.560
<v Speaker 1>seeing the same thing when it comes to coffee flavored,

0:41:40.680 --> 0:41:44.040
<v Speaker 1>especially if the price of coffee itself continues to go

0:41:44.160 --> 0:41:48.080
<v Speaker 1>up due to the terrafes all right, I will leave

0:41:48.120 --> 0:41:51.919
<v Speaker 1>it at that. I think I've said this a few

0:41:51.920 --> 0:41:55.919
<v Speaker 1>times this week. I've mentioned it now College Football Week one.

0:41:56.360 --> 0:41:59.600
<v Speaker 1>College football is sort of my great and favorite and

0:41:59.640 --> 0:42:04.880
<v Speaker 1>most passionate distraction. Baseball is also a passionate distraction. It

0:42:05.040 --> 0:42:08.080
<v Speaker 1>really stunk for me throughout this baseball season that, in

0:42:08.160 --> 0:42:13.280
<v Speaker 1>this tough time professionally, that we're covering these issues with Trump,

0:42:13.840 --> 0:42:18.600
<v Speaker 1>that my distraction in the evening Nationals baseball was almost

0:42:18.640 --> 0:42:23.760
<v Speaker 1>was almost as frustrating and didn't exactly uh, it didn't

0:42:23.800 --> 0:42:29.120
<v Speaker 1>exactly uh give me the uh, give me the detached

0:42:29.280 --> 0:42:31.400
<v Speaker 1>entertainment that you kind of want when you're trying to

0:42:31.640 --> 0:42:34.799
<v Speaker 1>when you're trying to uh trying to check out a

0:42:34.800 --> 0:42:38.879
<v Speaker 1>little bit, if you if you'd like to. I'm really

0:42:38.920 --> 0:42:44.160
<v Speaker 1>nervous about my Miami Hurricanes. I've been it has been

0:42:44.239 --> 0:42:47.799
<v Speaker 1>so long since they were the team to beat that

0:42:47.920 --> 0:42:51.560
<v Speaker 1>I now, you know, I'm always now, I'm like I'm

0:42:51.640 --> 0:42:54.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm like Wiley coated. I'm always waiting for the

0:42:54.440 --> 0:42:57.960
<v Speaker 1>anvil to drop. How are we going to blow this?

0:42:58.440 --> 0:43:00.880
<v Speaker 1>How are we going to screw this up? The infamous

0:43:00.920 --> 0:43:04.120
<v Speaker 1>fumble with Georgia Tech two years ago, the blown twenty

0:43:04.160 --> 0:43:10.080
<v Speaker 1>one point lead against Syracuse. But in some ways I

0:43:10.120 --> 0:43:14.719
<v Speaker 1>have some confidence that Miami at night is just a

0:43:14.800 --> 0:43:17.920
<v Speaker 1>whole different place to be when it comes to college football.

0:43:20.280 --> 0:43:23.959
<v Speaker 1>If not, I'll be eating some Irish crow the next

0:43:23.960 --> 0:43:27.480
<v Speaker 1>time I upload on Tuesday morning. With that, enjoy the

0:43:27.520 --> 0:43:31.239
<v Speaker 1>final weekend of the summer and until we upload again.