Speaker 1: Let not your heart be troubled. You are listening to
Speaker 1: the Sean Hannity radio show podcast. Hey, it's National Make
Speaker 1: a Will Month, and legal zoom dot Com makes taking
Speaker 1: care of your will or trust easier than ever with
Speaker 1: advice from independent attorneys, now available in forty eight states
Speaker 1: and no expensive hourly fees because legal zoom dot Com
Speaker 1: is not a law firm. Just enter Hannity. Want to
Speaker 1: check out for special savings now only at legal zoom
Speaker 1: dot com. I see we got the Clinton tax returns released.
Speaker 1: Will go over some of that here in the course
Speaker 1: of the program today. Happy Friday, and I mean it's
Speaker 1: a happy Friday. I am you know. I know that
Speaker 1: there are a lot of you out there nervous, concerned, worried, anxious.
Speaker 1: I'm not wonderful. I absolutely refuse to fall into the
Speaker 1: ebb and flow of the daily news cycle, which is that,
Speaker 1: Oh my gosh, what's gonna happen, How's this gonna work,
Speaker 1: How's this gonna happen. I'm just not going there. Let
Speaker 1: me tell you what is happening, though, And I want
Speaker 1: to be very clear, and it's part of a narrative
Speaker 1: that I have been advancing on this program now for
Speaker 1: a long long time. There's a story out there today
Speaker 1: and the headline is establishment GOP looks to Arizona, Florida
Speaker 1: primaries to bolster their ranks. I remember we endorsed on
Speaker 1: this program of Freedom Caucus member, somebody that I have
Speaker 1: a great deal of respect for that lost Tim Hulls
Speaker 1: Camp remember, And now Republican establishment folks look at that
Speaker 1: and they said, oh great, let's target more conservatives. That's
Speaker 1: what we're gonna do. In other words, you've got this
Speaker 1: whole group of people out here that from the very beginning,
Speaker 1: although they never really seem to coalesce behind anyone candidate,
Speaker 1: although I suspect it was always for them. They wanted
Speaker 1: Jeff Bush, but it never came together. I mean, that's
Speaker 1: why Jeff Bush had so much money, spend so much
Speaker 1: money in the primaries. And by the way, as a
Speaker 1: matter of speaking, I like Jeff Bush personally. I think
Speaker 1: he did a great job, was a great conservative governor.
Speaker 1: Um um. I just think unfortunately for him, there were
Speaker 1: a couple of things that were obstacles for him in
Speaker 1: this election. One is his last name. Fact, you're not
Speaker 1: making it up. You've had two Bushes as president, people like,
Speaker 1: all right, we need other people fresh blood. Has nothing
Speaker 1: to do with him personally. And I also think his
Speaker 1: position on immigration was a big obstacle for him in
Speaker 1: this election year, as was his common core comments. And
Speaker 1: it was the first interview I had in sepack with
Speaker 1: him in December. I'm sorry, March of I asked him,
Speaker 1: and so we spent a lot of time on those questions,
Speaker 1: and it because it turned out to be that way,
Speaker 1: you know, it's an act of love and all that
Speaker 1: sort of thing doesn't make him a bad person. My
Speaker 1: only anger with Jeb Bush and Lindsey Graham and and
Speaker 1: John Kasik, and to a lesser extent, I give I
Speaker 1: like Ted Cruz a lot personally, and he's not part
Speaker 1: of the establishment. Listen. They would love to defeat him
Speaker 1: like they beat Hulls Camp because he had the temerity
Speaker 1: to stand up on his principles and the Constitution and
Speaker 1: and fight and was willing to defund Obamacare and and
Speaker 1: Republicans had they stood with him, they could have actually
Speaker 1: done something profound and deep and successful. But I still
Speaker 1: wish you would keep his promise. And I do know
Speaker 1: got personal between him and Trump, but he fired back
Speaker 1: pretty hard too, and this is a blood sport. It's
Speaker 1: not for the weak hearted. I mean, every day now,
Speaker 1: somebody wants to send me an article of this person
Speaker 1: attacking me. I'm beginning to begun to realize here that
Speaker 1: all these you know, insignificant columnists that have audiences of
Speaker 1: of ten thousand, you know, or twenty Twitter followers, like
Speaker 1: that guy in the Wall Street Journal. The best thing
Speaker 1: I ever did was talk about this guy. So now
Speaker 1: everyone else tries to attack me and say, well, let
Speaker 1: me attack Kennedy. I want that kind of free publicity,
Speaker 1: and I take it as a badge of honor, and
Speaker 1: I love the fact. But I think we need a
Speaker 1: little history lesson here about where we are and why
Speaker 1: we're here, and what this election is really all about.
Speaker 1: In spite of how the media is trying to portray
Speaker 1: this to you and dishearten you. There is a poll
Speaker 1: out today at one point race between Trump and Hillary.
Speaker 1: If my gut tells me reading all of these polls,
Speaker 1: I would say probably nationally Trump is down three um
Speaker 1: with plenty of time left to go, and maybe even
Speaker 1: the defining event of this campaign season not even having
Speaker 1: happened yet. So we'll see what happens, but it is
Speaker 1: very telling. You know, I'll read this article to you.
Speaker 1: You got a superpack targeting Freedom Caucus member Paul Gozer
Speaker 1: in Arizona after they beat Tim hills Pack, and the
Speaker 1: goal is to have a House what's that? What do
Speaker 1: you say? Yeah, Tim hills Camp, I'm sorry? What do
Speaker 1: I say? I'm sorry about that? And the goal of
Speaker 1: this article says is to have a House conference that
Speaker 1: cooperates with Paul Ryan and leadership and primaries are the
Speaker 1: best way for establishment Republicans to eliminate quote troublemakers. Anyway,
Speaker 1: establishment backed Republican unseats. House Freedom Caucus member Alan Hulls
Speaker 1: Camp has been knocked off the establishment sites are shifting
Speaker 1: to Arizona and represent entitor Paul Gozer, who's been on
Speaker 1: this program before. Another member of the House Freedom Caucus
Speaker 1: now a group that calls themselves quote Right Way Superpack
Speaker 1: is now spending a thirty thousand dollars to take him down,
Speaker 1: with media opposing him and supporting his primary opponent, a
Speaker 1: pastor city councilman Guy. I won't even mention his name.
Speaker 1: Has he been in Washington too long? Goes the radio
Speaker 1: ad from the Right Way asks you not as they say,
Speaker 1: their right way, but they're really establishment way. Do you
Speaker 1: see what this is all about? There is a battle
Speaker 1: for the heart and soul of the Republican Party. And
Speaker 1: on the one hand, you've got, you know, look at
Speaker 1: the selection cycle. You've got publications Weekly Standard types. You've
Speaker 1: got people like Bill Crystal, You've got Wall Street journal
Speaker 1: types like this guy whatever his name, that was fighting
Speaker 1: b You've got National Review coming out with a front
Speaker 1: page full on assault on Donald Trump. As the primary
Speaker 1: as we're beginning now, it's a fascinating thing to me
Speaker 1: is they had their chance, They got tons of media coverage,
Speaker 1: they got their chance to talk to the voters in
Speaker 1: the Republican primary. And guess what the voters decided not
Speaker 1: to listen to them the republic That the voters decided
Speaker 1: that in spite of them, they're going they're gonna make
Speaker 1: this an anti establishment year. And that meant that the
Speaker 1: majority of voters were going for either Trump or Crews,
Speaker 1: and a majority a record number of people ended up
Speaker 1: voting in terms of a Republican primary. Record number of
Speaker 1: votes were given to Donald Trump. And now there is
Speaker 1: great gnashing of teeth and there's great anger, and there's
Speaker 1: there's smoke coming out of the ears of the n
Speaker 1: r O guys and guys at the Weekly Standard and
Speaker 1: guys at the Wall Street Journal. But remember, you know,
Speaker 1: we've tried it their way, We've had their experiments. Now, personally,
Speaker 1: I still stand by the fact I think Mitt Romney
Speaker 1: would have been a great president. That's my own personal feeling.
Speaker 1: I'm mad at him now. I think he's been very
Speaker 1: harmful and with all the support that was given to him,
Speaker 1: I think he should have been a little bit more
Speaker 1: of a team player and accepted the will of the people.
Speaker 1: But that's my own personal view. I don't I don't
Speaker 1: hold it against him personally. He's still a good man.
Speaker 1: I like his family. But he's hurting. It's, you know,
Speaker 1: part of a group of establishment that they're sabotaging Donald
Speaker 1: Trump's chances, but they don't want to take responsibility for
Speaker 1: it if Hillary Clinton wins. But boy, they deserve responsibility
Speaker 1: because they're the same people that would say to conservatives
Speaker 1: like me, hannay got a support McCain, hannay, he could
Speaker 1: get come on Bob Dole versus whoever Bob Dole's running
Speaker 1: against Bill Clinton. You gotta support McCain over over Barack Obama. Meanwhile,
Speaker 1: I went out there leading the charge, being told by
Speaker 1: really good friends of mine, big names. You would recognize
Speaker 1: that I was probably ruining my career, and my career
Speaker 1: would and in two thousand and seven and eight, because
Speaker 1: I went so hard against Obama, and I was doing
Speaker 1: it for a candidate that I knew was a Rhino
Speaker 1: Republican for the most part, but I knew he was
Speaker 1: better than Obama, and McCain would have been a better
Speaker 1: president than Barack Obama. Now you've got a situation where
Speaker 1: the establishment folks, the n r OH guys, and then
Speaker 1: you got the Weekly Standard guys in the Wall Street
Speaker 1: Journal guys, and they're all going out there. They went
Speaker 1: out there and they tried to persuade you stay away
Speaker 1: from Donald Trump. And I did what I promised you.
Speaker 1: I would do what's up on my website if you
Speaker 1: want to listen to my speech and see pack and
Speaker 1: ten and my speech at Sea Pack. I promised that
Speaker 1: I would give as much air time to every candidate
Speaker 1: as possible and leave the decision to you, the voters.
Speaker 1: And then no, no, not now. And then I said
Speaker 1: in twenty sixteen if people want to listen to it
Speaker 1: and can go to Hannity dot com. And then I said,
Speaker 1: whoever the winner is, I know some of you are
Speaker 1: going to be very angry and very emotion you know,
Speaker 1: but if we don't unite, we're not gonna win. So
Speaker 1: the very people that think of themselves as the great
Speaker 1: intellectual superpowers of the conservative movement, the establishment types, well
Speaker 1: they're now angry because they didn't You didn't vote the
Speaker 1: way they wanted, and you voted in record numbers for
Speaker 1: somebody else. Now what they're ignoring is something very basic
Speaker 1: and very fundamental, and that is there's a very good
Speaker 1: reason that this became an insurgency year, an outsider year,
Speaker 1: and it's because all of their establishment guys failed the
Speaker 1: American people. You don't need listen to me. Just look
Speaker 1: at every single solitary eggs a pole out there. What
Speaker 1: did it say. It's that Republicans feel betrayed by D. C. Washington.
Speaker 1: Republicans now that this just happened in a vacuum, or
Speaker 1: is there a good reason for this? Well, there happens
Speaker 1: to be pretty good reason for it, and the reason
Speaker 1: is is that prom uses were made conservative principles were
Speaker 1: espoused during campaigns, you know, the right words and rhetoric
Speaker 1: were used, and then they go to Washington and they
Speaker 1: thought they could bambooz oh their constituencies and they'd have
Speaker 1: all these show votes so they could go home and say, well,
Speaker 1: I voted to repeal and replace Obamacare. But they'd only
Speaker 1: do it when it had no teeth, no meaning, and
Speaker 1: it was just a show vote to be able to
Speaker 1: go back to their districts and be able to say
Speaker 1: they did it. But when the moment of truth came ted,
Speaker 1: Cruz being the exception, and Marco Rubio stood with him,
Speaker 1: and Mike Lee stood with him, and Ran Paul stood
Speaker 1: with him. And by the way, all four of those guys,
Speaker 1: for the most part, maybe with the exception of Rubio,
Speaker 1: they're hated by the establishment, you know, putting those four guys,
Speaker 1: we look at what they've done, and everybody else is
Speaker 1: mad at them. But at the end of the day,
Speaker 1: the failure is clear. Under John Bayner, the national debt
Speaker 1: went up nearly five trillion dollars. Well, that's not conservative
Speaker 1: to me. I can get that from the Democrats. Okay,
Speaker 1: maybe it would have been seven if John or didn't
Speaker 1: fight a little bit. But the reality is is when
Speaker 1: they ran for these offices and they said give us
Speaker 1: the house back, they said they would control spending, they
Speaker 1: said they would work towards balance budgets. They said they
Speaker 1: would use or assume they're going to use their enumerated power,
Speaker 1: which is the power of the purse, and not seed
Speaker 1: that power to the executive branches. They have done time
Speaker 1: and time again, and when they had real opportunities to
Speaker 1: defund aspects of Obamacare and take a courageous principle, stand well,
Speaker 1: that would never happen because there was always the fear
Speaker 1: how it would impact them. Well, we can't do that
Speaker 1: because you know what, there might be a backlash. You know,
Speaker 1: we're gonna give blame for a government shutdown. And all
Speaker 1: Obama had to do is threaten a government shutdown and
Speaker 1: and that was enough to make them bubble and fizz
Speaker 1: like alka seltzer and water. And then they said, okay, well,
Speaker 1: well just give us the Senate and then we'll be
Speaker 1: able to do it. We need the Senate to be
Speaker 1: able to do it. And by the way, we'll out
Speaker 1: that illegal and unconstitutional executive amnesty that the President is
Speaker 1: pushing Okay, Well, we gave him the Senate and they
Speaker 1: passed the Chrominibus bill instead of waiting till they had
Speaker 1: more power and more support in the Senate. And they
Speaker 1: said they defund the Department of Homeland Security sometime in
Speaker 1: February March, and then they ended up funding it there too.
Speaker 1: So I've been on this mission. I'm saying, all of
Speaker 1: you establishment people that are undermining and sabotaging Donald Trump
Speaker 1: and not endorsing him and and writing all these columns
Speaker 1: that who was it, Jamie Weinstein? I guess it's Michelle Fields.
Speaker 1: So I always liked too. She's mad at me now,
Speaker 1: but I always liked her, a nice person. I didn't
Speaker 1: agree with her on the Korey Lewandowski issue anyway. And
Speaker 1: he's saying, well, might as well surrender to Hillary right now,
Speaker 1: And then others are saying, well, we'll blame all of
Speaker 1: you guys that gave Donald Trump favorable treatment. I gave
Speaker 1: every Republican candidate good treatment. I let them answer questions.
Speaker 1: I would ask them questions so that you, the audience,
Speaker 1: could understand where they were coming from and let them
Speaker 1: explain things in their own words. Wasn't my job to
Speaker 1: go out there and debate them. My job was to
Speaker 1: let my audience hear from them. So but I'm telling
Speaker 1: all of you this and putting you all on notice here,
Speaker 1: is that if the Hillary wins and your sabotage from
Speaker 1: the get go didn't help, and you're just mad because
Speaker 1: the American people and voters didn't go along with you,
Speaker 1: and you picked up your little toys like little cry
Speaker 1: babies that you all are, and you're going home and
Speaker 1: you're doing everything you can do to undermine any chance
Speaker 1: that Trump has against Hillary Clinton. I still think has
Speaker 1: a great chance of winning. I hope. I don't have
Speaker 1: a crystal ball. I can't say for sure. You know what,
Speaker 1: probably the event that will define this election hasn't even
Speaker 1: happened yet. But when Hillary appoints liberal activists judge justices,
Speaker 1: remember you helped, You helped create that. You helped build
Speaker 1: that when more legal immigrants crossed the border. I know
Speaker 1: that a lot of establishment type Republicans they want cheap labor.
Speaker 1: But when more and more American jobs go away and
Speaker 1: the labor participation rate goes to the lowest levels in
Speaker 1: the fifties, well, you help build that. When no wall
Speaker 1: goes up and somebody crosses the border and commits an
Speaker 1: act of terror, will you help build that? When education
Speaker 1: remains failed and flawed and topped down from Washington and
Speaker 1: doesn't get sent back to the States, well you're partly responsible.
Speaker 1: If America is not energy independent in the next day years,
Speaker 1: you can pat yourselves on the back back for that.
Speaker 1: If there are restrictions on our Second Amendment rights, I'd
Speaker 1: say you played a part in that. If if you
Speaker 1: can have a president that can't say radical Islam, we're
Speaker 1: not gonna win that war, well you take a hand
Speaker 1: in that too. And it goes on and on. So
Speaker 1: that's my point to all of you. As far as
Speaker 1: I'm concerned, I don't have contempt for the American voters.
Speaker 1: I understand their anger, their frustration. I understand why they
Speaker 1: voted the way they did. And I just find that
Speaker 1: almost laughable that all of you phonies out there, you're
Speaker 1: just angry you have no influence, because if you had influence,
Speaker 1: maybe people would have maybe people would have listened to you,
Speaker 1: but you weren't too persuasive. Why Because you're part of
Speaker 1: the problem as well. And if this whole system, this incestuous,
Speaker 1: corrupt system, doesn't get fixed. Well, then you can watch
Speaker 1: America declined to and you can take credit for that,
Speaker 1: because that's exactly what's gonna continue. And if you you know,
Speaker 1: that's why, my my heart, my mind, my soul, I'm
Speaker 1: at peace with where I've been and where I stand here.
Speaker 1: Donald Trump is infinitely better than Hillary is. Agenda is
Speaker 1: infinitely better. And I will proudly pull that lever as
Speaker 1: I promised I would do, and support the winner of
Speaker 1: this nominating process, the people's choice. You want to go
Speaker 1: against them, and you take the blame if Hillary Clinton wins.
Speaker 1: It's National make a Will month, so it's time to
Speaker 1: check an important item off that to do list, that
Speaker 1: honeydoo list. At legal zoom dot com. A spending a
Speaker 1: few minutes right now on your will or trust that
Speaker 1: means that you can enjoy a warrior free summer filled
Speaker 1: with family vacations and barbecues. Now you don't want government
Speaker 1: making decisions on important matters like finances or your kids.
Speaker 1: Legal zoom dot com they make it easy. They're not
Speaker 1: a law firm, so you don't have to take time
Speaker 1: out of your day for office visits or pay expensive
Speaker 1: hourly rates. Instead, you get flat rate pricing and can
Speaker 1: save over one dollars with legal zooms will or trust
Speaker 1: a state plan bundles. Now, if you don't know whether
Speaker 1: a will or trust is right for you, let not
Speaker 1: your heart be troubled. You're gonna work with an independent
Speaker 1: attorney now available in forty eight states. They can answer
Speaker 1: your questions and recommend the estate plan that fits your
Speaker 1: specific needs. Now save money today, do the right thing
Speaker 1: during National Make a Will Month at legal zoom dot com.
Speaker 1: Don't forget. Enter Hannity one in the referral box when
Speaker 1: you check out, and you'll save even more. So spend
Speaker 1: time with your family this summer. Let legal zoom dot
Speaker 1: com take care of the legal stuff that's legal zoom
Speaker 1: dot com. Legal zoom dot com. Tuesday of next week,
Speaker 1: we will be in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, and we're gonna do
Speaker 1: a town hall with Donald Trump. He's gonna give a
Speaker 1: big speech on ISIS and radical Islam, and then we're
Speaker 1: gonna do a one hour event. And there's so much
Speaker 1: I can tell you about it, but you can go
Speaker 1: to Hannity dot com if you want to be in
Speaker 1: the audience, if you're in the Wisconsin area, and it
Speaker 1: should be a lot of fun, and I hope you
Speaker 1: can make it. By the way that Clinton's here's a
Speaker 1: few facts. Adjusted gross income tax return donated to charity
Speaker 1: one million, a little over a million, nine point eight
Speaker 1: percent of their income. Okay, fine, you know, grand though
Speaker 1: great liberals should donate more because they've paid so much more.
Speaker 1: But it's certainly better than donating old underwear, as the
Speaker 1: Clintons have done in the past. And you might say
Speaker 1: that at least they donated to another charity. Well, the
Speaker 1: charity that they donate to it was a relatively unknown
Speaker 1: charity called the Desert Classic Charities, and donated the money
Speaker 1: right back. The Internet immediately did some digging, looked into
Speaker 1: the charity's filings, and the charity donated seven thousand dollars
Speaker 1: to the Clinton Foundation in you donate to us, will
Speaker 1: donate to you. So essentially of the Clinton's charitable donations
Speaker 1: when to the Clinton Foundation. And worse yet, there seems
Speaker 1: to be some weird, bizarre kind of funneling. My friend A. J.
Speaker 1: Delgado picked this up and told me about this earlier today.
Speaker 1: It donated to a charity that donated a huge chunk
Speaker 1: to the Clinton Foundation. So you know, okay, you give
Speaker 1: to us, we'll get well, i'll get you. Listen, you
Speaker 1: give us a little something, I'll give you a little something.
Speaker 1: We'll call it today. What does that mean? You know,
Speaker 1: this is a person for years who have spoken about
Speaker 1: the helping the downtrodden. Okay, she makes over ten million
Speaker 1: dollars a year but donates nothing to any charity outside
Speaker 1: of her own. And then you say, all right, well,
Speaker 1: the Clinton charity is a charity, the Clinton Foundation, Well,
Speaker 1: from what I've read, they've only give ten percent of
Speaker 1: what they take in, so they have big problems with that.
Speaker 1: It's been widely criticized the small percentage of the Clinton
Speaker 1: Foundation money that is ever used. In other words, it's
Speaker 1: spent for overhead, etcetera. I've seen estimates as low as
Speaker 1: the only ten percent actually goes to real charity. And
Speaker 1: they're constantly paying for the Clinton's travel and their personal
Speaker 1: aids and payroll and so on and so forth. The
Speaker 1: four teen tax return showed that out of their twenty
Speaker 1: eight million dollars income that year, half of their three
Speaker 1: million dollar charitable donation again to the Clinton Foundation. Okay,
Speaker 1: but why is it more of that money going to charity?
Speaker 1: Makes you wonder it's a big story. So you know,
Speaker 1: you gotta love the government and how they lie to you.
Speaker 1: How many times have I told you that the government lies,
Speaker 1: especially about issues involving the unemployment rate. So it turned
Speaker 1: out in July they were told you, oh wow, we
Speaker 1: had a whopping tour and fifty thou jobs created, and
Speaker 1: and all the those in the liberal media telling you
Speaker 1: this is great. New York Post business analyst John Dell
Speaker 1: points out the US economy actually lost a million point
Speaker 1: oh three jobs in July. Labor Department announced two five
Speaker 1: thousand new jobs. The discrepancy is caused by the so
Speaker 1: called seasonal adjustments. They make these every year. In other words,
Speaker 1: teachers leaving the workforce for the summertime, retail workers laid
Speaker 1: off in bunches after Christmas. In other words, all of
Speaker 1: that is normal and acceptable to economists as part of
Speaker 1: a natural, predictable ebb and flow of the economy and
Speaker 1: the job market. Now, the question is, were this July
Speaker 1: seasonal adjustments? Were they consistently applied from say, last July. Now,
Speaker 1: labor was the labor when they give these numbers. Labor
Speaker 1: gives out the numbers. They were more generous this year
Speaker 1: when converting their raw data. So, for example, those one
Speaker 1: point oh three million jobs lost when they adjusted into
Speaker 1: the seasonally adjusted number that everyone quotes as the new
Speaker 1: jobs number. Had they used the same one point to
Speaker 1: two million seasonal adjustment this year that they had used
Speaker 1: last year, it would have been sixty fewer jobs last month.
Speaker 1: But again, you know, you get unemployment numbers, they don't
Speaker 1: actually tell you the real unemployment rate because they don't
Speaker 1: count the long term, chronically unemployed and those that have
Speaker 1: actually given up because they can't get a job. That's
Speaker 1: another criticism I have a Republicans because this is pretty interesting,
Speaker 1: isn't it. Republicans, have you ever wondered why Republicans haven't
Speaker 1: forced the issue of building the wall because they're pressured
Speaker 1: by all the people that give them money to run
Speaker 1: their campaigns, big business that wants cheap labor. It's a
Speaker 1: whole segment of our society that wants open borders because
Speaker 1: they want to hire the guy for five bucks an hour,
Speaker 1: not the American for fifteen bucks an hour. And the
Speaker 1: problem is with open borders, eleven fourteen million people more
Speaker 1: people coming in every day, is so you've got Americans
Speaker 1: out of the labor force. And then you've got X
Speaker 1: number of jobs available right now in the slow economy,
Speaker 1: the slowest recovery since the four ease, and so people
Speaker 1: are competing for those limited jobs. Then you have illegals competing,
Speaker 1: and that's driving down not only opportunity but wages. Oh
Speaker 1: or Republicans like that too. Ever, ask yourself, when Republicans
Speaker 1: have power, why don't they ever go after building the wall?
Speaker 1: Because they they've had their own special interests for If anything,
Speaker 1: Democrats are smarter. They're thinking, all right, well, let's hope
Speaker 1: that seven out of ten of these illegal immigrants one
Speaker 1: day become citizens and they vote. We hope they'll vote Democratic,
Speaker 1: and will assume they'll vote Democratic, so they at least
Speaker 1: have are playing long ball. Republicans are just shortsighted. Can
Speaker 1: I get enough money to get elected in my next
Speaker 1: campaign cycle? You know? Do you understand? Gotta understand about
Speaker 1: this whole system. You've got the whole rest of the country,
Speaker 1: and then you've got Washington, and Washington is just unique
Speaker 1: in and of itself in this sense. You've got Congress,
Speaker 1: you've got the Senate, you got the White House, you
Speaker 1: got staffers, and for the congressmen you've got staffers for
Speaker 1: the senators, you've got staffers for the White House, and
Speaker 1: then you've got at the media. And what you've got
Speaker 1: is one big incestuous cesspool where all they do is
Speaker 1: pat each other on the back, go out, have drinks,
Speaker 1: make out with each other, buddy up with each other,
Speaker 1: and oh, can you I need this item in about
Speaker 1: my senator? Can you can you put this in there?
Speaker 1: You've got very little investigative reporting. I mean just on
Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton alone in the email scandal. You know, there's
Speaker 1: no Woodward and Bernstein that are emerging today, even though
Speaker 1: there's more opportunity than there's ever been before. I mean,
Speaker 1: you can look at all the other issues, look at Clinton.
Speaker 1: Look at all these people that I mentioned this week
Speaker 1: that had access because they're Clinton Foundation dotors to Hillary Clinton,
Speaker 1: and how they reap financial rewards. One guy gets the
Speaker 1: rights to Colombian forest. He's a big Clinton Foundation donor.
Speaker 1: Another guy gets a meeting with you know this whatever
Speaker 1: country it was that he needed a meeting with because
Speaker 1: he goes through the Clinton Foundation and Hillary Secretary of State,
Speaker 1: and you know, all those people are getting rewarded and
Speaker 1: it's just corrupt. And then comes Donald Trump, and he
Speaker 1: wants to blow up the whole system. And he says,
Speaker 1: I don't need your people, I don't need your people's money.
Speaker 1: I don't need anything from you people. And he doesn't
Speaker 1: do things in conventional ways. He doesn't say conventional things.
Speaker 1: And all those people that like the system is it's
Speaker 1: currently designed, both Republicans and Democrats, because they're equally guilty.
Speaker 1: John Byner didn't stop stop the debt from rising. Republicans
Speaker 1: aren't using enumerated powers. They're seating their constitutional authority to
Speaker 1: a president that wants to build up more and more
Speaker 1: power in the executive branch. So they're not fighting. And
Speaker 1: thus we have all of the you know, the conditions
Speaker 1: we now have the country in. And for those of
Speaker 1: the Wall Street Journal and the Weekly Standard and National
Speaker 1: Review and all of those presidential candidates who refused to
Speaker 1: endorse Trump, and Paul Ryan more critical of Trump than
Speaker 1: he's ever been a Hillary in Obama, they haven't fought
Speaker 1: the Obama agenda. You know, I just say this, You're
Speaker 1: you're gonna get the government you all deserve from probablyly
Speaker 1: I guess deep down want because I don't think they
Speaker 1: can handle the change that Trump would probably bring to
Speaker 1: them because he would. He is not going to be
Speaker 1: your typical politician. And if you just look on paper,
Speaker 1: you know there's no earthly reason when you know Hillary
Speaker 1: Clinton is going to appoint those to the Supreme Court
Speaker 1: that do not respect the Constitution, do not believe in
Speaker 1: checks and balances, separation of powers. But she's gonna put
Speaker 1: activists judges on the bench. And those those elites that
Speaker 1: think they're so smart and so much smarter than you,
Speaker 1: the lowly voters out there, We the lowly voters that
Speaker 1: they are criticizing all of you that voter for Donald Trump,
Speaker 1: and they're out there undermining him and sabotaging him every
Speaker 1: step of the way. Well, when Hillary makes that at
Speaker 1: Supreme Court appointment, they own it. They they they're not
Speaker 1: supporting him, they're undermining him. They're undermining anybody that does
Speaker 1: support him. They're basically have nothing but contempt for the
Speaker 1: American people. They want to take their middle finger and
Speaker 1: shove it right up your face, and they want to
Speaker 1: get right in your grill, and they want to blame you,
Speaker 1: the American voter, because you didn't listen to their admonitions
Speaker 1: and your warnings, and you didn't go along with the
Speaker 1: establishment person that they probably wanted. I would guess it
Speaker 1: was probably Jeff Bush and n R O and Weekly
Speaker 1: Standard and Bill Crystal and the Wall Street Journal and
Speaker 1: all these people. You know what, They had their opportunity
Speaker 1: to influence you, and you didn't pay attention to them.
Speaker 1: And we did our job here. We put every candidate
Speaker 1: on the air. We gave him access to the airwaves
Speaker 1: to make their case, and they made it, and then
Speaker 1: you made up your mind. And so now they don't
Speaker 1: want you to win because they look bad. But they're
Speaker 1: the same people though in past years that would say
Speaker 1: to conservatives that, hey, you know, we really need you
Speaker 1: guys on board here, what do you want Barack Obama?
Speaker 1: But they didn't go out in front and lead with
Speaker 1: their chin the way I did as it was taking
Speaker 1: on the Obama agenda. You know, these these same people.
Speaker 1: You should see when their stupid little books come out.
Speaker 1: A lot of these guys write books all the time, Linda,
Speaker 1: you can testify to this. Well, all right, all these
Speaker 1: guys write books. You know, a lot a lot of
Speaker 1: book writing going on, a lot of book writing. And
Speaker 1: by the way, these books ever sell. Nope? Okay, So
Speaker 1: what do they do these people that have nothing but
Speaker 1: contempt for talk radio, nothing but contempt for Fox News,
Speaker 1: nothing but contempt for those people that are voted for Trump.
Speaker 1: What's gonna happen when their books come out? What what's
Speaker 1: the first call that they have their publicists make to
Speaker 1: you that's correct and sing to us, and then we
Speaker 1: tell you and then what do I say? Now? Ten times? Sorry?
Speaker 1: Not now? No? And it's just amazing. So you know,
Speaker 1: I'm just saying to these guys, Okay, you've you've got
Speaker 1: what you wanted. You're hoping that in the sense you
Speaker 1: think they are hoping that Hillary wins. They want to
Speaker 1: be able to put their middle finger in your face,
Speaker 1: the voters face. They want to be able to say,
Speaker 1: what we should have gone with another McCain or no there,
Speaker 1: Bob Dole. I happen to like Mitt Romney. I think
Speaker 1: Mitt Romney would have been a good president. But Mitt
Speaker 1: Romney got really bad advice, especially in that third debate.
Speaker 1: I think he could have won that election. My own
Speaker 1: personal opinion. I'll never forget that night. I was screaming
Speaker 1: at his team, what did you just do? Why did
Speaker 1: you take your foot off the gas? I think they
Speaker 1: got a little bit scared after what had happened with
Speaker 1: Candy Crowley in the second debate. So when you don't
Speaker 1: get original nous on the Supreme Court and you're not
Speaker 1: supporting Trump, you can look yourself in the mirror and
Speaker 1: you can blame yourself. As far as I'm concerned, if
Speaker 1: if you have all of these people crossing the border,
Speaker 1: and maybe somebody crosses that as part of ISIS. A
Speaker 1: report in the paper today about how one person associated
Speaker 1: with ISIS is now telling our own national security people
Speaker 1: that yeah, there are people in Mexico that are ISIS sympathizers. Okay,
Speaker 1: what if they one day crossed the border. What if
Speaker 1: they one day go to a town or a city
Speaker 1: in America to bring harm to the American people. Donald
Speaker 1: Trump could have stopped that. Hillary Clinton won't build a wall.
Speaker 1: You know, Hillary Clinton gonna rebuild our military. You trust
Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton with anything involving the military after Libya, after
Speaker 1: supporting the Iraq war and then seating that ground that
Speaker 1: Americans fought, bled and died for to isis to create
Speaker 1: a vacuum for them, Or the idiocy of making a
Speaker 1: pledge that if President assad ever uses any type of
Speaker 1: biological or chemical weapons against his own people. That's a
Speaker 1: red line, and they'll be a price to pay for that. Well,
Speaker 1: now the void has been filled in both Syria and
Speaker 1: Iraq by Isis. You can blame Hillary and you can
Speaker 1: blame Obama for that. Donald Trump did yesterday and he's
Speaker 1: absolutely right and his analysis. So if you if you
Speaker 1: don't have a wall, and you don't rebuild the military,
Speaker 1: and education is still top down and they suck up
Speaker 1: to the n e A of Hillary's president, and if
Speaker 1: she fires those coal miners that she promised to fire
Speaker 1: and puts cold companies out of work, and we don't
Speaker 1: start any drilling in the country and we don't do
Speaker 1: any fracking in the country, and we don't create those
Speaker 1: millions of high paying jobs, and then you can blame
Speaker 1: yourself if if you don't get better trade deals, if
Speaker 1: you keep Obama care, if you have a president that
Speaker 1: can't say radical Islam, and you're not gonna protect your
Speaker 1: Second Amendment rights, take your sanctimony and shove it right
Speaker 1: up your own ass. Because you helped cause that you built,
Speaker 1: that you created. That that makes sense, Linda, you're getting
Speaker 1: that in your head. It's it's impossible for them to
Speaker 1: get the bigger picture, you know. So they they always
Speaker 1: wanted conservatives to go against their own principles and support
Speaker 1: these rhinos. But boy, when the American when Republican voters
Speaker 1: say they feel betrayed, and for good reason, because Republicans
Speaker 1: haven't stood on their principles. They're not limiting the size
Speaker 1: and scope of government, they're not fighting the good fight
Speaker 1: when they cower every time Obama says that he's gonna
Speaker 1: blame them for shutting down the government and they see
Speaker 1: their enumerated constitutional authority, What are you saying in my ear? Yeah,
Speaker 1: Rodney danger Field is calling? Is that really the Rodney
Speaker 1: from the from the beyond? What's up from the bed?
Speaker 1: That's for sure? How you doing, Rodney, I'm got no
Speaker 1: respect to you. Yeah, I get no respect either. Hey,
Speaker 1: I just wanted to tell you I don't believe the polls.
Speaker 1: I think they're full of it because all where I live,
Speaker 1: nobody's got a Hillary bumper, nobody's got any Hillary signs
Speaker 1: in that front law, and oh I see his Trump.
Speaker 1: So I don't believe the polls. I think they're skewed.
Speaker 1: I know, as stut I can't prove it, but I
Speaker 1: know that as skewed. Listen, I don't know if anything
Speaker 1: excuse listen, I think you just have to take the
Speaker 1: polls for what they are. Here's what's going to decide
Speaker 1: the election. The people in Florida, the people in Ohio,
Speaker 1: the people in Pennsylvania, Virginia, North Carolina, the people in
Speaker 1: New Hampshire, the people in Iowa, Wisconsin, Michigan, New Mexico, Colorado,
Speaker 1: and Nevada. That's probably if assuming everything else is about
Speaker 1: what we would expect it to be. That's my take.
Speaker 1: And uh, well, you know, the American people will get
Speaker 1: the government they deserves. Just a fact. I happen to
Speaker 1: think we should be ambitious while we're at it. Let's
Speaker 1: connect every household in America to broadband by the year
Speaker 1: twenty and it's crucial that every American have access to
Speaker 1: the education and skills they need to get the jobs
Speaker 1: of the future. So we will fight to make college
Speaker 1: tuish and free for the middle class and debt free
Speaker 1: for everyone. Raising the federal minimum wage won't just put
Speaker 1: more month the pockets of low income families, it also
Speaker 1: means they will spend more at the businesses in their neighborhoods.
Speaker 1: This is this is something that This is economics one
Speaker 1: oh one. We need to get incomes and wages rising
Speaker 1: and it will help the whole economy grow and be fairer.
Speaker 1: We will fight for a more progressive, more patriotic tax
Speaker 1: code that puts American jobs first. I am proposing and
Speaker 1: across the board income tax reduction, especially for middle income Americans.
Speaker 1: This will lead to millions of new and really good
Speaker 1: paying jobs. The rich will pay their fair share, but
Speaker 1: no one will pay so much that it destroys jobs
Speaker 1: or undermines our ability as a nation to compete. Tax
Speaker 1: simplification will be a major feature of the plan. United
Speaker 1: States also has the highest business tax rate among the
Speaker 1: major industrialized nations of the world, at thirty five. It's
Speaker 1: almost when you add in taxes at the state level,
Speaker 1: and in many cases and many states, it's much higher
Speaker 1: than that. In other words, we punish come from making
Speaker 1: products in America, but let them ship products into the
Speaker 1: United States tax free if they move overseas. This, ladies
Speaker 1: and gentlemen, is backwards. This is backwards. Policies should be
Speaker 1: geared towards keeping jobs and wealth inside of the United States. Alright.
Speaker 1: Second Hour, Shawn Hannity Show, Happy Friday, toll free or
Speaker 1: telephone numbers eight hundred nine for one, Shawn, you want
Speaker 1: to be a part of the program speaking about jobs. Now, look,
Speaker 1: you're hearing two distinct, very different visions for the country
Speaker 1: as it relates to the economy, as it relates to jobs,
Speaker 1: as it relates to energy, as it relates to coal
Speaker 1: and drilling and fracking and nuclear technology, and the millions
Speaker 1: of jobs that could be created, for example, in that industry,
Speaker 1: you know, identifying radical Islam or not identifying radical Islam,
Speaker 1: bringing in unvetted refugees, increasing it or not doing that,
Speaker 1: building a wall or having open borders. I mean repealing Obamacare,
Speaker 1: replacing it or not. Supreme Court justices with fidelity to
Speaker 1: the Constitution, or those that want to legislate from the bench.
Speaker 1: There's so much at stake here, and that's why I
Speaker 1: get so frustrated with the establishment types. Well, I can't
Speaker 1: wait in on this election and I can't support Trump.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna sit on the fence. I don't want anyone
Speaker 1: thinking badly of me because he one time said something
Speaker 1: that was controversial. Well, this is how bad it is.
Speaker 1: You know, we have an update till last week. Remember
Speaker 1: last week's unemployment rate. They told you the government unchanged
Speaker 1: four point nine percent, And we keep telling you that
Speaker 1: we're now at a fifty one year low in terms
Speaker 1: of home ownership rates. In this country. We have the
Speaker 1: worst recovery since the nineteen forties, lowest labor participation rates
Speaker 1: since the seventies. Twelve million more people in poverty, seven
Speaker 1: million more people, I'm sorry, twelve million more on food stamp,
Speaker 1: seven million more in poverty. Okay, So last week the
Speaker 1: government told you they created two and fifty thousand jobs.
Speaker 1: If you look at the New York Post and their
Speaker 1: business analysts John Crudell, he actually writes the US economy
Speaker 1: lost one point oh three million jobs in July. The
Speaker 1: Labor Department and what they announced last year last with
Speaker 1: a two hundred fifty five thousand dollar job gained well.
Speaker 1: The discrepancy is caused by so called seasonal adjustments and
Speaker 1: other words, adjusting for seasonal oddities like teachers leaving the
Speaker 1: workforce and mass in the summertime and retail workers getting
Speaker 1: laid off in bunches after Christmas is quote normal and
Speaker 1: acceptable to economists that this time. The question is where
Speaker 1: the seasonal adjustments applied fairly and consistently in July. Well,
Speaker 1: it turns out that Obama's Labor Department was far more
Speaker 1: generous this year when converting its raw data. So, in
Speaker 1: other words, the one point oh three million jobs that
Speaker 1: were actually lost into the seasonally adjusted number that everyone
Speaker 1: quotes as the new jobs number. And other words, had
Speaker 1: the Labor Department used the same one point to two
Speaker 1: million seasonally adjustment for the year like they used last year, well,
Speaker 1: it would have produced sixty five thousand fewer new jobs
Speaker 1: last month. In other words, a hundred and ninety thousand
Speaker 1: verses two hundred fifty five thousand. So, in other words,
Speaker 1: you're lied to again and again and again. Here was
Speaker 1: us Herman Kane Mr. Himself. At least I understood what
Speaker 1: would have been better than the economic mess this guy created.
Speaker 1: How are you, sir? How you doing? Yeah? Good? What's
Speaker 1: going on? Well, you know, people trying to compare Donald
Speaker 1: Trump's economic plan to Hillary Clinton's economic plan is like
Speaker 1: comparing apples and oranges. And here's why. You know that
Speaker 1: Trump has some specifics in there about reducing the corporate
Speaker 1: tax rate, lording the individual tax rates, reducing it from
Speaker 1: seven to three removing regulations, putting the moratorium on new regulations,
Speaker 1: and saying that he was going to ask every federal
Speaker 1: department to provide a list of waste that we could eliminate.
Speaker 1: That's a plan. Hillary Clinton didn't give a plan. Her
Speaker 1: whole set of scattered thoughts were about the redistribution of income,
Speaker 1: more taxes, more regulations, and more free stuff. That's all
Speaker 1: she talked about yesterday. So that's where we are. Well,
Speaker 1: I agree with that. And you know what's bothering me
Speaker 1: is you have all these guys that ran for president.
Speaker 1: For example, you made a run for the presidency, and
Speaker 1: when you were running, at one point you were even
Speaker 1: leading until the media smeared and slandered you. But that's
Speaker 1: a different story. We've discussed it before. But didn't you
Speaker 1: make a promise. Didn't the media and Republicans say, well,
Speaker 1: you support the eventual nominee. Didn't they ask you that?
Speaker 1: And didn't you keep your promise? And I for you
Speaker 1: to do that. I supported Mitt Romney, Sheldon and I
Speaker 1: and I thought I still think Mitt Romney would have
Speaker 1: been a good president. I even met with Mitt Romney
Speaker 1: on several occasions and said, mit, you won, let me
Speaker 1: give you some thoughts that you might want to consider
Speaker 1: so you can win. I wanted him to win. Well.
Speaker 1: The sad part is Mitt Romney did not take any
Speaker 1: of the advice that I gave him. Not that all
Speaker 1: of my advice is perfect, he didn't do any of
Speaker 1: it because of his political supporters who were basically telling
Speaker 1: him to ignore what he says. You know, you know,
Speaker 1: act like you're listening, but really don't do anything. And
Speaker 1: that's one of the reasons he lost. Yes, he lost
Speaker 1: because a lot of conservatives stayed home, but he also
Speaker 1: lost because he didn't take the one big piece of
Speaker 1: advice that I gave Mitt Romney that he didn't take.
Speaker 1: I said, you need to be bold relative to the economy.
Speaker 1: That's what Donald Trump has done. He's been bold. Hillary
Speaker 1: Clinton isn't, and so that's why I did. But I
Speaker 1: did not go around saying never met never meant no.
Speaker 1: And I'm just as discussed it as you are about
Speaker 1: all of these so called Republicans who are showing that
Speaker 1: true hypocrisist stripes by continuing to push back. And every
Speaker 1: time they pushed back, Seuan and you know, and I know,
Speaker 1: and we've both been talking about this on our respective
Speaker 1: shows that this is helping Hillary and hurting the Republican Party.
Speaker 1: You know, I agree, and I'm watching all of these people.
Speaker 1: It seems like everybody's got their own little agenda here.
Speaker 1: I think everyone filters their support through. How does this
Speaker 1: make me look? And I try and look at what's
Speaker 1: in the best interest of the country, And for me,
Speaker 1: it's the issues I just said. It's the Supreme Court,
Speaker 1: it's refugees, it's identifying the evil of our time. It's immigration,
Speaker 1: it's Obamacare, it's energy, you know. And though if we
Speaker 1: got those six issues fixed alone, it would make the
Speaker 1: country a dramatically better place than what it is now
Speaker 1: and stop the precipitous decline that America is now in.
Speaker 1: I would like to see that happen. You know. I
Speaker 1: went on a tweet storm the other day and this guy, right, so,
Speaker 1: who are you to tell us? And I'll tell you
Speaker 1: who I am. I'm a guy that was an eight
Speaker 1: year old paper boy, a twelve year old dishwasher, a
Speaker 1: thirteen year old cook of fourteen and fifteen year old
Speaker 1: bus boy and waiter, seventeen year old bartender, a guy
Speaker 1: that framed houses, painted houses, hung walled paper laid tile,
Speaker 1: did roofing, fell off a roof three stories, and a
Speaker 1: guy that was able to navigate slow, very slowly into
Speaker 1: a dream that I had, which was to be on radio,
Speaker 1: working for free for years and working for very little
Speaker 1: money for a lot of other years. I said, that's
Speaker 1: who I am, and I just happened to love my country,
Speaker 1: and I'm a patriot, and I don't like all the
Speaker 1: economic statistics I give out every day where so many
Speaker 1: Americans are suffering. Shane, Shane, why do you call me
Speaker 1: Shane every single time? You're Chane? My producer's name is
Speaker 1: Shane Shane. Okay, okay, Mr Trump, what's going on you Shan?
Speaker 1: But that's a natural mistake. When I called Shane, mistake,
Speaker 1: you do it all the time every time you're on
Speaker 1: all right purpose, boss on your mind today? Go ahead
Speaker 1: of the mother. So don't get offended. Okay, offended, I'm
Speaker 1: not even a little bit is exactly true, and that
Speaker 1: is true of a lot of us. My first job
Speaker 1: was shining shoes. I have shanned shoes. I have been
Speaker 1: an assistant janitor. My dad used to be a janitor
Speaker 1: for the Pillsbury company. I was his assistant at twelve
Speaker 1: years old. That was a good job. People don't know
Speaker 1: that you and I worked our way up because we
Speaker 1: kept working hard. And see, here's the thing. When Hillary
Speaker 1: and the Democrats come out with Donald Trump talking about
Speaker 1: where he's a billionaire, the tax cuts are gonna help him,
Speaker 1: and he's on an incident that is bull feathers and
Speaker 1: you after you know it, he is one of three
Speaker 1: hundred and twenty million people. What about those people that
Speaker 1: are still struggling. What about those businesses that are on
Speaker 1: the brink of bankruptcy and they need Donald Trump's tax
Speaker 1: cuts and reduction and regulations to help them. So that
Speaker 1: do you make of all these people that are panicking?
Speaker 1: I mean, you gotta pull out today that shows it's
Speaker 1: a one point race. You would think that this is
Speaker 1: not a winnable race. And I just that's all I
Speaker 1: know is to be There's so much that's gonna happen.
Speaker 1: There's so much game left to play here. Yeah, that
Speaker 1: these poles, uh Sean are manipulated. I know that I
Speaker 1: have looked at some of these poles, and I do
Speaker 1: what a lot of people don't do. I read all
Speaker 1: the way to the end. If they don't tell me
Speaker 1: how many people in the sample, and what the distribution
Speaker 1: was between Democrats, Independence, and Republicans. I discount the pole
Speaker 1: and a lot of those polls that claim that Hillary
Speaker 1: had this great lead, they are not outed in terms
Speaker 1: of how they did the poll. But they want these
Speaker 1: posters and the Democrats and the liberals, they want the
Speaker 1: public to believe that Hillary has such a great lead.
Speaker 1: She's out in front because they don't want to talk
Speaker 1: about her dishonesty. They don't want to talk about her lying,
Speaker 1: they don't want to talk about her bad judgment. They
Speaker 1: are trying to cover up for her. And between you
Speaker 1: and I and a few of the conservative talkers, we
Speaker 1: have to educate people. And that's what you're doing a
Speaker 1: great job of. And that's why I talk about this
Speaker 1: stuff every day. You know I talked about it too.
Speaker 1: Are you getting as much fire as I'm getting when
Speaker 1: I point out what the differences are between Hillary and
Speaker 1: and and that, for example, let's say Hillary, god forbid
Speaker 1: ever won this election. I'm I'm I'm holding a lot
Speaker 1: of people responsible. Harmon. I'm saying that those those fellow
Speaker 1: presidential candidates like Kasik and Jeb and Graham and I
Speaker 1: love ted cruise. But I'm disappointed that he's not fulfilling
Speaker 1: his promise. I know it was disappointed with Donald Trump.
Speaker 1: So anyway, seeing that ran against Donald Trump, all of
Speaker 1: these never trumpers, all of these anti trumpers, they will
Speaker 1: be responsible for Trump losing interior. They are already trying
Speaker 1: to position themselves as well. It's not our faults, Yes,
Speaker 1: it is your fault. It is your fault because rather
Speaker 1: than try to get out a Republican nominee, elected flaws
Speaker 1: and all based upon your perception less basically prevent Hillary
Speaker 1: from appointing those liberal judges running this country into the
Speaker 1: ground with more spending and higher taxes. They are losing
Speaker 1: sight of the real objective you're shown. And I'm with you.
Speaker 1: I'm totally disgusted with them, with them, and I'm calling
Speaker 1: them out at every opportunity. Yeah, I'm calling them out
Speaker 1: as well. You know, It's just very interesting to me
Speaker 1: is that there's been real sabotage here and real damage done.
Speaker 1: And it seems to me that the endgame for a
Speaker 1: lot of these people is to be able to pat
Speaker 1: themselves on the back after they are saboteurs and say,
Speaker 1: and by the way, this is in all of them.
Speaker 1: I think some of some honest intellectual differences, but I
Speaker 1: think for some it's they want to be able to
Speaker 1: stick their finger in the face of every voter, every person,
Speaker 1: like for example, like myself. I think I was very
Speaker 1: fair to every candidate in the course of this primary.
Speaker 1: I didn't endorse anybody. I said from March of fifteen
Speaker 1: at Seapeck, I'd support the winner. But they really it
Speaker 1: seems like there's a real contempt, that there is a
Speaker 1: rejection of the establishment. It's there's a real contempt. Every
Speaker 1: exit poll showed six Republicans felt betrayed by their own
Speaker 1: party and disappointed by their own party. So I just
Speaker 1: think that there's so many self centered people here in
Speaker 1: all of this. The people that are continuing to push
Speaker 1: back and make these laugh ditch efforts to try and
Speaker 1: sabotage Donald Trump, who are slack quote unquote Conservatives and Republicans.
Speaker 1: One is sour Graves and two they think that they
Speaker 1: are the keymakers if they don't die into who ought
Speaker 1: to be president. They want to basically go against the
Speaker 1: will the American people. Donald Trump won for one very reason.
Speaker 1: The voters, the conservative Republican voters said this is who
Speaker 1: we want to be out a candidate, and they also
Speaker 1: saying this is who we want to be president in
Speaker 1: the United States of America. These establishment people are pushing
Speaker 1: against the will of the people. And the good news, Shaun,
Speaker 1: is that the people are realizing the vast different As
Speaker 1: long as this stuff goes on between the establishment folk
Speaker 1: and an outside like Donald Trump, they are cheering for
Speaker 1: Donald Trump. Somebody wants say it. Donald Trump is gonna
Speaker 1: go to Washington, d C. As president. He's not just
Speaker 1: gonna sit at the head of the table. He's going
Speaker 1: to turn the table over. That's what they are afraid of. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I think you're right. I think it's the table being
Speaker 1: turned over. And if the table is not turned over,
Speaker 1: guess what America will continue. It's decline with the help
Speaker 1: of the Republican Party week effeckless, visionless, spineless, which is
Speaker 1: what they have been. All right, kermen, good to talk
Speaker 1: to you one, Shawn told free telephone number. You want
Speaker 1: to be a part of the program. Dan Bungino or
Speaker 1: Buddy from Florida is going to join us. He's up
Speaker 1: in an important race and a primary down there, as
Speaker 1: well as Gary Byrne, both former secret service agents, and
Speaker 1: we're gonna talk about did or is the Secret Service?
Speaker 1: Are they actually looking into Donald Trump over a second amendment? Comments?
Speaker 1: All right, let's get to our busy phones here. All right,
Speaker 1: we're not allowed to play the music anymore. Is the
Speaker 1: only caller that had music that is now paying from
Speaker 1: the show our buddy to Varus, We got an update
Speaker 1: on him, Greenville, North Carolina, Sir, how's the new job?
Speaker 1: How are you doing? Hey? The new job is great.
Speaker 1: Insanity Hannity. That used to be a name, but now
Speaker 1: it is now it's uh crazy Shane. But all right,
Speaker 1: thanks a lot now you now alright, alright, herman the
Speaker 1: second We really appreciate it. Crazy Shane has been great. Listen. Um. Ironically,
Speaker 1: I my employer is a sixty year old uh farmer
Speaker 1: who while he was in the field, uh doing the
Speaker 1: crops as far as uh, he's our combine and he
Speaker 1: used to listen to you when a law tom ago
Speaker 1: he said, and we were talking and he said and
Speaker 1: and law story short, he came up that I was
Speaker 1: too far. He was like, no, that's that's you for real.
Speaker 1: And this just that so happened that we talked about
Speaker 1: everything from Donald Trump to Hillary Clinton, to Black Lives
Speaker 1: Matter Too, to the clan, the KKK, to black pathers,
Speaker 1: to everything in between. Sean and and we opened each
Speaker 1: other's eyes on a lot of things. He's independent, who's
Speaker 1: voting for Who's voting for Trump? Because he's tired of
Speaker 1: he used to be a Republican. He's tired of the
Speaker 1: Republican Party, he said. But he said, he's still holding
Speaker 1: his brother and he's vote for Trump, you know what
Speaker 1: I mean. But he asked me why I was voting
Speaker 1: for Hillary. I said, because he's a white woman. That's
Speaker 1: why I'm vote to Hillary. Why I was with ab
Speaker 1: I supposed to laugh at that comment. Was that supposed
Speaker 1: to be funny? Yeah, it was supposed to be funny.
Speaker 1: If you think let me let me get serious. Is
Speaker 1: this the new Shane Hannity? Yeah, this is the new
Speaker 1: Shane Hannity. Right? Is this? Is this my favorite over
Speaker 1: the road truck driver? Here? It's this my man? Is
Speaker 1: this the guy? Yeah? By the way, how much how
Speaker 1: much money do you think you could make in a
Speaker 1: year doing this new job? If you don't mind me
Speaker 1: doing this new job, doing this new job, I can
Speaker 1: make uh, at least at least forty thousand and before
Speaker 1: and before Sean, I was at maybe twenty four three,
Speaker 1: you know. So, so we basically have doubled your income.
Speaker 1: And all it took was you, all of you. Was
Speaker 1: all it took was you getting a little bit of
Speaker 1: an opportunity. And you're making a pledge to me that
Speaker 1: you follow up and you finish your job and you
Speaker 1: do the school and you get it done, and you
Speaker 1: did your part and said we made a really good nime.
Speaker 1: I'm not done yet. You know, I'm not done yet. Man,
Speaker 1: I'm gonna. I'm gonna. I'm gonna improve on it, and
Speaker 1: and I'm gonna pay it for it. I gotta have to,
Speaker 1: you know, I have to do this. I'm hauling pigs.
Speaker 1: I'm on a pig. I work for real line pigs.
Speaker 1: You're holding in your eighteen winning alive at the time
Speaker 1: on these beautiful North Carolina roads. You know all that swine.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna. I'm gonna look out for you. Yeah, you
Speaker 1: got to. It smells great, It smells great. We unbelievable.
Speaker 1: I don't eat I don't eat pork. You listen, let
Speaker 1: me tell you something. If I went from a job
Speaker 1: that paid me and I'm now making twice as much,
Speaker 1: around twice as much as I was making. I'd be
Speaker 1: a happy American. But you know, I'm so happy. I'm
Speaker 1: so happy. I'm ecstatic. I'm trying to be I think
Speaker 1: you should be so happy. You should say, Hannity for you.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna do it for you. I'm voting Trump because
Speaker 1: I know that means that much to you. I think
Speaker 1: you should say that I'm not gonna make you. I
Speaker 1: didn't don't know. I would probably do that, but Sean,
Speaker 1: he's like a uh, he's like a crack head that
Speaker 1: won't stop smoking his own crack man, you can't, Okay,
Speaker 1: But Hillary is a really Hillary is really honest. Hillary
Speaker 1: is really honest. She's really trustworthy. She's really somebody that is,
Speaker 1: you know, somebody that you can really depend on and
Speaker 1: count on. You're right, you're right. And the thing is,
Speaker 1: she is a liar. She has been calling her lies.
Speaker 1: But while we won't, Trump let her waller in her mess.
Speaker 1: Why he keeps shooting himself in his foot, that's a
Speaker 1: book of a typical Republican keep shooting themselves in the foot.
Speaker 1: They listen, think, there are times I've i've gave my
Speaker 1: advice to Donald Trump publicly, and that is that I
Speaker 1: think he's got to focus on two I think he's
Speaker 1: got to focus on two people. We've got a lot
Speaker 1: of game left to play. I'm not buying into this
Speaker 1: notion he can't win. What he's promising America versus what
Speaker 1: she's promising, it's to me, it's it's distinct, it's discernible.
Speaker 1: And if anybody wants Hillary to pick a Supreme Court justice,
Speaker 1: I'll blame all of you. You know. It's it's funny.
Speaker 1: And I know that I've I've rattled the cages of
Speaker 1: of these elites like the Bill Crystals and Jonah Goldberg's
Speaker 1: of the world, and you know, the the guy at
Speaker 1: the Wall Street Journal Stevens, Brett Stevens or whatever his
Speaker 1: name is. And I know that they want to blame
Speaker 1: me for all of this, and they say, hey, I
Speaker 1: facilitated all of this. You know what they really are
Speaker 1: saying deep down here is they have contempt for the
Speaker 1: voting public. That they think the voting public if I
Speaker 1: had as much influence as these people say that I had,
Speaker 1: you got to agree because you've been with me for
Speaker 1: a long time. Obama never would have been president, would he? Uh?
Speaker 1: You know what happened. The reason why Obama is president,
Speaker 1: has been president two terms is because Republicans didn't pivot
Speaker 1: and get everybody to vote for them. They still at
Speaker 1: ten eight one percent Black vote, seven percent Hispanic. It's like,
Speaker 1: it's a shame. It's a shame. It's it's it's come
Speaker 1: on and and chon. You can't drag down the Trump
Speaker 1: across the line. Your name has to be Jesus Christ
Speaker 1: in order for this man to to have a come
Speaker 1: to Jesus meeting, and and and and take himself out
Speaker 1: of his own comments, back out Donald, and and let
Speaker 1: and let the Republicans help you help yourself get cross
Speaker 1: the finish line. You why are you sabotizing your own self?
Speaker 1: I haven't seen anything like it, Sean. What's going on for? Really?
Speaker 1: Why are you giving? Why who are you going? Ary?
Speaker 1: Who are you going? Well? Look, I make a you
Speaker 1: make a good point. I understand your your arguments and
Speaker 1: your points. Here. Bottom line is you've got the most corrupt,
Speaker 1: the most dishonest, the biggest liar that I think has
Speaker 1: ever run for that office. And that's saying a lot.
Speaker 1: And you know what if America votes for it, then
Speaker 1: America will get what it what they will deserve. And
Speaker 1: when Hillary makes a Supreme Court appointment, I guess fingers
Speaker 1: will be pointed all over the place. But I'm I'm
Speaker 1: gonna blame the National Review guys, and I'm gonna blame
Speaker 1: the Weekly Standard guys in the Wall Street Journal guys.
Speaker 1: And I'm gonna blame every Republican candidate that broke their
Speaker 1: word and said, oh, I can't vote for the winner
Speaker 1: even though I said I'd vote for the womener um,
Speaker 1: you know. So I'm gonna blame them. I'm gonna blame
Speaker 1: them for their sabotage, for their inability to work with
Speaker 1: the candidate and try and get on the same page
Speaker 1: and try and win an election. So that's who I'm blaming. Anyway,
Speaker 1: Appreciate it to VARs. Gave you a lot of time.
Speaker 1: One shown on number Let's go to Sherry Is in
Speaker 1: New Jersey the all new A M seven ten w
Speaker 1: O R. How are you? How are you doing? Did
Speaker 1: to talk to you again? Happy Friday to you? What's
Speaker 1: going on? Listen? Um Trump? I've been a Trump supporter
Speaker 1: from day one, and um, I just I'm just getting
Speaker 1: nervous and I need you to tell me to calm down.
Speaker 1: Everything will be fine, just you know, see watching TV,
Speaker 1: I have news, I see the poll and it's really
Speaker 1: I'm really getting nervous. And you know what, And if
Speaker 1: you're a Trump supporter, you should be acting as though
Speaker 1: you're behind. You should be acting as though everything is
Speaker 1: on the line. You should be acting as though that
Speaker 1: there's a chance you can lose, and you should use
Speaker 1: that sense of urgency to motivate you to get out
Speaker 1: there and help whatever way you can. That's how I
Speaker 1: would he really want this, right? Yes? I think he
Speaker 1: really I think he really wants us. Yes, I believe
Speaker 1: that to be true. I hope, so, I hope. So alright, listen,
Speaker 1: you're the best the heshari. I'm not gonna say letting
Speaker 1: not your heart be trouble. I don't have a crystal ball.
Speaker 1: I can't I can't predict. All I can do is
Speaker 1: read polls like you do, analyze them as best I can.
Speaker 1: If I would have to guess today, my guest nationally
Speaker 1: is probably Trump is down by three. As I look
Speaker 1: at polls, um, I think Hillary has had a little
Speaker 1: good run. I think Trump has run into some bumpy road.
Speaker 1: I think some adjustments need to be made. I've talked
Speaker 1: about him at length. I've done monologues both on radio
Speaker 1: and TV. So that's my take. But it's certainly winnable.
Speaker 1: I think America is gonna have to see these two
Speaker 1: together on stage. I think Hillary is gonna be well prepared.
Speaker 1: She's gonna have all of her lines, she's gonna have
Speaker 1: all of her attacks, and Donald Trump is gonna have
Speaker 1: to sit there and and she's gonna do everything she
Speaker 1: can do to anger him and upset him and make
Speaker 1: him mad. And if he reacts to that and plays
Speaker 1: into her narrative about temperament, then I think she'll win.
Speaker 1: If he stays discipline and stays on message and stays
Speaker 1: on the attack himself in a smart, witty, funny way,
Speaker 1: and he shows America that his vision is going to
Speaker 1: be better for the economy, better for national security, then
Speaker 1: he wins. So you know, there's still a lot of
Speaker 1: a lot of game left to play here. I don't
Speaker 1: go with the day by day. I've warned you last year,
Speaker 1: during glad two years, I've warned you about this. You're
Speaker 1: gonna have polls go up and down and all around
Speaker 1: and Mark goes up and cruises up in case that
Speaker 1: gets up, and this person won this date, and that
Speaker 1: person won that state, and all of a sudden, you know,
Speaker 1: the next day you're scared to death. If you're a
Speaker 1: Trump supporter, you're heading into Wisconsin. Ted Cruz wins Wisconsin. Wow.
Speaker 1: Ted Cruiz is back in it now. Ted cruises to win.
Speaker 1: Indiana must win for Trump. It's all part of the process,
Speaker 1: the evan flow of politics. That's what makes it so
Speaker 1: fascinating and so fun to watch. But at the end
Speaker 1: of the day, this isn't like a sporting event. When
Speaker 1: the game is over, your team loses out, Well, no
Speaker 1: big deal, we'll get him next time. We'll get him
Speaker 1: next year. It's it's more significant because this impacts generations
Speaker 1: to come, especially with the Supreme Court. Uh. Larry is
Speaker 1: in Hawaii. Larry, Hi, how are you? And we're glad
Speaker 1: you called. I'm doing well. Thanks for taking the call.
Speaker 1: I'm calling in response to the doctors that were on
Speaker 1: yesterday and um and also the prevailing attitude that I
Speaker 1: believe is constant deception in our society has become the norm.
Speaker 1: I think that without a doubt, the president is dishonest,
Speaker 1: and it's Hillary is dishonest. It's celebrated, but it's spreading
Speaker 1: other professionals. The doctor you had on yesterday was dishonest,
Speaker 1: and if you would indulge me for a minute, she
Speaker 1: was saying that Trump has personality disorders and that I've
Speaker 1: got the diagnostic criteria for personality. So disorder is pretty straightforward.
Speaker 1: And I'm going to give you a couple and tell
Speaker 1: me who who this applies to. Failures to conform to
Speaker 1: social norms with respect to lawful behaviors. It's indicated by
Speaker 1: repeatedly performing acts that our grounds for arrest Trump or
Speaker 1: Clintons as indicated by repeated lying. Clinton is supposed to
Speaker 1: be a trick question or aggressivenesss disregard for safeties as
Speaker 1: self than others. Right, so you're what kind of what
Speaker 1: kind of medicine do you practice? What kind of medicine
Speaker 1: do you practice? I'm a certain you're a sorry, what
Speaker 1: kind of sergeant? But people, I don't want to give
Speaker 1: out too much information because it's a small island and
Speaker 1: this crew is pretty vengeful, and um, I could talk
Speaker 1: to you off the air, But anyone who takes care
Speaker 1: of people, whether they're in law enforcement or hospital settings. Um, No,
Speaker 1: it's personally disoriented when they see them. But now you've
Speaker 1: got doctors who who are saying things that are absolutely false.
Speaker 1: And even though it's kind of hard when they're hiding
Speaker 1: all the information, but I gotta move on. Larry, appreciate it.
Speaker 1: Thank you for one. Shawn, Wendy and Tennessee Wendy High.
Speaker 1: How are you glad you called? How are you Sean?
Speaker 1: I'm good, welcome to the show. Well, I feel like
Speaker 1: the media makes mister turned out to be this horrible person,
Speaker 1: and I would, like you just said in Tennessee and
Speaker 1: he was in our area on Wednesday, and I know
Speaker 1: some law enforcement officers that got to meet him, and
Speaker 1: they said their opinion of him changed greatly. He was
Speaker 1: very genuine, down to earth, He was very friendly. He
Speaker 1: talked to him just like they were, like he was
Speaker 1: anyone else, and he he really wanted to hear what
Speaker 1: they had to say. He shook their hands, he took pictures,
Speaker 1: and um, and they really felt like he cared and
Speaker 1: he cared about the law enforcement community. And I really
Speaker 1: feel like he really wants to make America great again. Well,
Speaker 1: I think if he if you applied the promises as
Speaker 1: he has been discussing them to the country. I think
Speaker 1: they solve a lot of our problems. And in the
Speaker 1: sense that what Hillary is offering offering versus what Trump
Speaker 1: is offering, and that to me is what I'm looking
Speaker 1: at here. We know what we're gonna get with Hillary.
Speaker 1: You can't expect things to change. The definition of insanities
Speaker 1: you do the same thing over and over again, expecting
Speaker 1: a different result. Well, Hillary will do what Obama has done,
Speaker 1: and if you expect a different result, then that is
Speaker 1: the definition of insanity. And that's what infuriates me somewhat
Speaker 1: about all of these these guys on the right that
Speaker 1: consider themselves the great intellectual powerhouses of the conservative movement,
Speaker 1: and they are not. And you know, many of them
Speaker 1: have interventionist needs and desires, have learned nothing from what
Speaker 1: happened in Iraq and Vietnam and all these you know,
Speaker 1: young men are national treasure. They fight, bleed and die,
Speaker 1: and then we give up because these wars get politicized.
Speaker 1: They don't seem to learn or you know a lot
Speaker 1: of them want to cater to big business and cheap labor,
Speaker 1: and that's why they don't want to build the wall.
Speaker 1: A lot of them have their own other selfish motivations
Speaker 1: as it relates to things and what they have been
Speaker 1: trying and the people that they have sent to us
Speaker 1: as president in the past, they have not worked. Mint
Speaker 1: Romney didn't win, Bob Dole didn't win, John McCain didn't win.
Speaker 1: And now they're taking their toys and they're going home
Speaker 1: and they're being cry babies. And anybody that is supporting
Speaker 1: a more populist nationalist like Donald Trump who's making very
Speaker 1: specific conservative promises is somehow the Antichrist, and we're responsible
Speaker 1: and the people are stupid because the people didn't listen
Speaker 1: to them. That's the only reason that they think we're stupid.
Speaker 1: So anyway, appreciate the call one Shaun. There is our
Speaker 1: number if you want to be a part of the program.
Speaker 1: Dan Bongino, Gary burned two Secret Service guys. Turns out
Speaker 1: the Secret Services not investigating a CNN reported Donald Trump
Speaker 1: over his remarks about Hillary in the Second Amendment. That
Speaker 1: was a lie. That was more media bias. We'll get
Speaker 1: to that when we get back running for office in Florida.
Speaker 1: You're running for Congress, So do you support this kind
Speaker 1: of language? This kind of rhetoric coming from Donald Trump
Speaker 1: as as someone who's running for elected office. Don what
Speaker 1: kind of language trying to motivate answer the question? Donald
Speaker 1: Trump said today was an answer to the question yes
Speaker 1: or no do you support to vote for Donald sport Don.
Speaker 1: People who believe an amendment should absolutely vote against the
Speaker 1: gun grabber Hillary Clinton one percent, and whatever you need
Speaker 1: to say within the realm of reason to motivate people
Speaker 1: to get out and vote, yes, you should do that
Speaker 1: because you will lose yours of all. That's a talking
Speaker 1: point to call someone a gun grab or no one
Speaker 1: is trying to take your guns. That is a talking
Speaker 1: talking point. You never you're like captain talking point and
Speaker 1: then you throw it back at me, your your your insults.
Speaker 1: What's my talking point? Tell me what that talking point is? Dan,
Speaker 1: you came into this and you said, listen, this is
Speaker 1: pretty clear Donald Trump was implying some kind of a
Speaker 1: violent act against Mrs Clinton, which I was a talking twice.
Speaker 1: How is that talking? That talking Do you know what
Speaker 1: a talking point is? Talking point is when you get
Speaker 1: a political operative and you go on television every single
Speaker 1: day and you say the same thing over and over
Speaker 1: and over, whether it's wrong or not because have been
Speaker 1: said something. I never said this over and over. Do
Speaker 1: You're actually the first person asked me about it, So
Speaker 1: I've never said this over and over. That's not a
Speaker 1: talking point. You asked me a question. I gave you
Speaker 1: an answer. It's clear to me. And and Jeffrey again,
Speaker 1: I appreciate your comments, but I disagree with you completely
Speaker 1: on this when you take the totality of circumstances. The guy,
Speaker 1: he was not a guy in a bar making these comments.
Speaker 1: It was a presidential candidate giving his speech where he
Speaker 1: was talking about the Second Amendment. This isn't even close
Speaker 1: to The Secret Service would laugh this off if you
Speaker 1: brought this in their office. All right, news rounds up
Speaker 1: and information overload our that's our buddy Dan Bongino fighting
Speaker 1: it out over at CNN and by the way, headline
Speaker 1: on Drudge for a big part of the day is
Speaker 1: how CNN is losing their viewership because they've gone so
Speaker 1: hard pro Hillary Clinton. And of course, my buddy Dan
Speaker 1: Bongino is running for Congress down in southwest Florida in
Speaker 1: the Fort Myers and Naples region. That's Connie max old seat,
Speaker 1: and I have endorsed him for that position as I
Speaker 1: have a condo down there. How are you, sir? Hey, great, Sean,
Speaker 1: thanks for having me appreciate it. What's going on? What
Speaker 1: did you tell me about that exchange? I mean, I
Speaker 1: thought you got the better of it. I mean, but
Speaker 1: you can just see how hostile these meat news media
Speaker 1: people are. Yeah, I know you've been dealing with this
Speaker 1: for a while, you know, given the popularity to show
Speaker 1: these left the hacks. But what they do, Sean, is
Speaker 1: they come into an interview like that with a pre
Speaker 1: existing narrative or with Lemon. Ironically, for to was a
Speaker 1: talking point in your head, the talking point about Donald
Speaker 1: Trump's Second Amendment comments if you're a hard leftist or
Speaker 1: mainstream media type, but I just said the same thing twice, right.
Speaker 1: The talking point is Donald Trump was implying in violence
Speaker 1: against Hillary Clinton? Is okay? Now, Sean, having been a
Speaker 1: Secret Service agent for twelve years, if you actually listened
Speaker 1: to the speech he game, not only is there not
Speaker 1: even a threat, there's not even an implied threat. But
Speaker 1: the irony of that is that Lemon Don Lemon feels
Speaker 1: the need to go after me. I'm not a Trump
Speaker 1: Sarah get Sean at all. I've never spoken to the
Speaker 1: Trump campaign ever, I've never met Donald Trump. Have nothing
Speaker 1: to do with the Trump campaign. But what I do
Speaker 1: have something to do with this conservatism, And I'm pired
Speaker 1: of media hacks, you know, dictating what the average reasonable
Speaker 1: Americans should think. The average reasonable American should have come
Speaker 1: out of that and said, Okay, Donald Trump is trying
Speaker 1: to motivate Second Amendment voters. Not Donald Trump was implying violence.
Speaker 1: Is okay, it's just ridiculous. Well, I think it's ridiculous too.
Speaker 1: And you know, look, you know then there was a
Speaker 1: report all oversea and then that they got wrong, that
Speaker 1: the Secret Service had questioned them. By the way, also
Speaker 1: with us is Gary Byrne. He's the decorated White House
Speaker 1: Secret Service veteran. He was there for the eight years
Speaker 1: that the Clintons were in the White House, right outside
Speaker 1: the Oval Office store. Now, both of you are in
Speaker 1: the Secret Service. Do you see this as any threat?
Speaker 1: And wouldn't the Secret Service if they thought it was
Speaker 1: in threat in any way, wouldn't they have questioned Donald Trump? Yeah,
Speaker 1: they would have. And I do not see it as
Speaker 1: a threat. I agree with Dan. Actually watched an interview
Speaker 1: this morning again just to make sure. And first of all,
Speaker 1: you Danny did a great job. I see why you're
Speaker 1: running for Congress, and I wish the best of luck.
Speaker 1: And to this is just Dan said, is exactly right.
Speaker 1: This is just the left already pre set up when
Speaker 1: they got there. And it's funny because you know, they
Speaker 1: had David Gergen there, who is supposed to be everybody
Speaker 1: always says he's somebody in the middle, and both sides
Speaker 1: respect him. He is a pent Clinton supporter. Don't let
Speaker 1: them want to him for you, I've been following him
Speaker 1: for years. And the ideal that what Donald Trump said
Speaker 1: was anything other than motivational speech for people to go
Speaker 1: out and protect their Second Amendment rights. If anybody thinks
Speaker 1: anything else, they're completely wrong. And they're just playing into
Speaker 1: this notion that that there's something functionally wrong with Donald Trump,
Speaker 1: and there's not. It's just the way he speaks. He's
Speaker 1: learning to be a politician. Well, I think that's zombious.
Speaker 1: I mean yeah, And you know what, I also played
Speaker 1: all these comments of people like John Kerry and other
Speaker 1: people over the years, and all the things they've said.
Speaker 1: On the case of John Kerry's talking about going to
Speaker 1: the White House, and taking out the key guy, which
Speaker 1: is George W. Bush. Nothing happened with him. You remember
Speaker 1: when they when Dan quel was president, people making comments
Speaker 1: if if you ever hear Bush dies, they have the
Speaker 1: Secret Service as orders shoot Quail. Yeah. So I was
Speaker 1: there when that happened, and I was appalled by the
Speaker 1: time because I wasn't the Secret Service, and I you know,
Speaker 1: I protected Dan Quaile and I thought he was a
Speaker 1: pleasant guy. And um, you know, but nobody lashed out
Speaker 1: at the congressman who said that, you know, he got
Speaker 1: to apologize and that was it. But because Donald Trump's
Speaker 1: running for president and the mainstream media, which Dan you
Speaker 1: said the best, is also the left. Um, you know,
Speaker 1: they do everything they can to make him look bad.
Speaker 1: I'm telling you, if Donald Trump cured cancer tomorrow, they
Speaker 1: triticized him because it took him three days. How you
Speaker 1: know Hillary's lie by the way about Bosnia, Remember when
Speaker 1: she made the lie, wasn't that an attack on the
Speaker 1: Secret Service? Because if she landed under sniper fire, wouldn't
Speaker 1: that have been the Secret Service that failed her? Yeah? Absolutely?
Speaker 1: And in the military. I mean, you know, Dan can
Speaker 1: talked to this a little bit better than I can,
Speaker 1: because he was an actually an agent where I was
Speaker 1: a uniform division officer. Um, yeah, they Dan and myself.
Speaker 1: I'm sure. I'm not that I can speak for Dan,
Speaker 1: but anybody who was ever in the Secret Service when
Speaker 1: they heard that story, they rolled on the floor laughing.
Speaker 1: There's no way that could have happened without everybody knowing
Speaker 1: it about it and being a bit a big deal. Yeah, Sean,
Speaker 1: I'm so glad you asked this question because you're really
Speaker 1: one of the few guys who brought that up. My gosh,
Speaker 1: if that happened, wouldn't there have been an actor action
Speaker 1: report and the Service or what they call in the military,
Speaker 1: like a hot wash or something exactly, there was a
Speaker 1: protectee who was there was a potential assassination attempt by snipers,
Speaker 1: and nobody heard about it. I mean, what a slap
Speaker 1: in the face to the U S. Secrets. Let me
Speaker 1: play this because I mean, this was such a lie.
Speaker 1: I mean, you know, there's so many lies when it
Speaker 1: comes to Hillary. You got the Benghazi lies, which are
Speaker 1: dramatic because they impact the lives of four Americans and
Speaker 1: their families. Their dead, their families will never see their
Speaker 1: loved ones again. And at this point, what difference does
Speaker 1: it make in her mind? But of course they denied
Speaker 1: security before they denied security during the attack, they were
Speaker 1: more concerned about what uniform rooms that are brave men
Speaker 1: and women that were going to be part of the
Speaker 1: rescue rescue would be wearing. And then after, of course,
Speaker 1: just lying right to the faces of the family. And
Speaker 1: you've got all the homey confirmed lies on the email
Speaker 1: server scandal, and now you've got this lie. I think
Speaker 1: this is probably one of the if not the biggest
Speaker 1: lie she's ever told. I certainly do remember that trip
Speaker 1: to Bosnia, and uh, I remember landing under sniper fire.
Speaker 1: There was supposed to be some kind of a greeting
Speaker 1: ceremony at the airport, but instead we just ran with
Speaker 1: our heads down to get into the vehicles to get
Speaker 1: to our base. Remember landing under No, wait, that's what
Speaker 1: I said when I was sleep deprived. You can read
Speaker 1: my book, and I said something very different. Yeah, I misspoke.
Speaker 1: It was totally totally misspoke. You know, I've talked about
Speaker 1: this endlessly, I wrote about it, and I don't know
Speaker 1: what I was thinking, because, yeah, we were told that
Speaker 1: we had to land under you know, some threats, and
Speaker 1: the military did a great job. I was the first
Speaker 1: first lady taken to a war zone since eleanor Roosevelt. Um.
Speaker 1: But that was just sleep deprivation or something. Yeah. Imagine
Speaker 1: Donald Trump said I landed under sniper fire, and he
Speaker 1: didn't land under sniper fire. Dan Bongino. Yeah, and Sean,
Speaker 1: there's another doozy here that people forget that Gary would
Speaker 1: know intimately haven't been in the uniform division. Do you
Speaker 1: remember when we had the government shut down, the Barack
Speaker 1: Obama shutdown because he wouldn't sign the budget. And who
Speaker 1: did he blame for the White House tours being shut down?
Speaker 1: They blamed the Secret Service, which Gary, you know, haven't
Speaker 1: been involved in the Uniform Division. I think with service,
Speaker 1: Uniform division doesn't shut down White House tours. And most
Speaker 1: people assigned the tours are there no matter what. But
Speaker 1: again they were convenient, and you know, you're right. I
Speaker 1: was in tours for almost three years and we did
Speaker 1: tours for everybody. We never denied anybody that was pure
Speaker 1: political fear. They do best, all right, So tell me
Speaker 1: a little bit about your race. How's that going, Dwan Bongino, Uh,
Speaker 1: it's going great. I know you know the area well,
Speaker 1: Sean having new place down here. It's tough, though, I'm
Speaker 1: fighting they I mean as inside baseball and established and
Speaker 1: carrying as you can get. He's he's knocking us on
Speaker 1: the air with about a hundred grand plus, you know,
Speaker 1: in negative adds a week. And it's tough. But I
Speaker 1: feel really good. The conservatives, the libertarians, the constitutionalists are
Speaker 1: coalescent behind the race. I think we're gonna pull it
Speaker 1: out the primaries August thirty. Absentee ballots are already in
Speaker 1: the mail. We'll vote by mail, as we call it
Speaker 1: down here. So I feel good about it. But you know,
Speaker 1: it's tough. This guy's got a lot of money and
Speaker 1: he'll stop enoughing to, you know, to try and try
Speaker 1: and kneecap me in this race. And I you know,
Speaker 1: I fight back, though, yeah, now you fight back hard.
Speaker 1: All right. Let me go back to this whole issue,
Speaker 1: because this is where you got in the fight with
Speaker 1: CNN and play the montage of liberals saying the things
Speaker 1: that they say. Talk to your neighbors. I want you
Speaker 1: to talk to them, whether they're independent or whether they
Speaker 1: are Republican. I want you to argue with them and
Speaker 1: get in their faith. We talked to these folks because
Speaker 1: they potentially have the best answers. So I know who's
Speaker 1: asked to kick. Gonna punish our enemies, and we're gonna
Speaker 1: reward our friends who stand with us on issues that
Speaker 1: are important to us. I might have to put Mr
Speaker 1: Burgess on Fox News. I'll put, I'll put, I'll put
Speaker 1: Mr Burgess up against Sean Hannity. Him and my husband
Speaker 1: did not wrap up the nomination until he won the
Speaker 1: California primary um somewhere in the middle of Junie. Right,
Speaker 1: we all remember Bobby Kennedy was assassinated in June in California. Uh,
Speaker 1: you know, I just I don't understand it. We ran
Speaker 1: away to a wonderful retreat in Vermont, and that was
Speaker 1: our that was our to getaway. You couldn't went. You
Speaker 1: could have went to New Hampshire and killed two birds
Speaker 1: with one stone, could have gone to United Pennsylvania and
Speaker 1: killed the real bird flood Star. My friends, A lot
Speaker 1: of every citizens out there don't understand the importance of
Speaker 1: that court. I mean, the death of Scalia saved labor,
Speaker 1: and I don't we'll wish you anyone ill happened a
Speaker 1: good time? Am I right to perceive that you enjoy
Speaker 1: fighting with Donald Trump. No, No, you're absolutely wrong about that.
Speaker 1: I would Donald Trump would just disappear. Donald Trump would
Speaker 1: be a danger to the United States. This man should
Speaker 1: never be allowed to come within miles of the White House.
Speaker 1: I guarantee you Barack Obama ain't taking my shotguns. So
Speaker 1: don't buy that. Don't buy that. They're gonna they're gonna
Speaker 1: start peddling that to it. I got he tries to
Speaker 1: pull he's got a problem. Wow, Gary Byrne your reaction
Speaker 1: on that. Yeah, that's that basically showing that's part of
Speaker 1: the thrust of my book that I wrote, Crisis of Character.
Speaker 1: And there's two standards. They can say whatever they want
Speaker 1: anytime they want. You let a conservative say something like that,
Speaker 1: and they go right off the deep end. Um the
Speaker 1: crazy stuff that the Vice President has said over the
Speaker 1: years about taking your shotgun and walking out to your
Speaker 1: back porch and shooting a couple of rounds if you
Speaker 1: hear somebody in your backyard, come on, that's worse than
Speaker 1: anything I've heard Mr Trump say. And um, so yeah,
Speaker 1: it just goes back to there's two standards of the
Speaker 1: standards for liberals or for the Clintons, and the standards
Speaker 1: for everybody else. Yeah, you know it's funny because I
Speaker 1: know you were there with her eight years and you're
Speaker 1: trying to tell the story what has happened to you
Speaker 1: because we're talking a lot about the media bias here.
Speaker 1: So you tell a story. You were outside the Oval
Speaker 1: office for eight years, Hillary Clinton, you you explained as
Speaker 1: a phony here she when she has big donors or
Speaker 1: guess oh, Gary is my favorite Secret Service guy ever?
Speaker 1: And then how does she treat you behind the scenes?
Speaker 1: How does she treat the rest of the Secret Service staff?
Speaker 1: She treats treats them terribly. She's had some of her staff,
Speaker 1: like I said, uh talked about before they were they
Speaker 1: were terrified sean to tell her that they made a mistake.
Speaker 1: And of course I've talked about the story that the
Speaker 1: one the agent I used to work with years ago,
Speaker 1: where she punched him in the back of the head
Speaker 1: with the Bible. And then you know she berated me
Speaker 1: because and and and and this isn't the butt. And
Speaker 1: part of this story is that you know, Mrs Clinton
Speaker 1: is one of these people wants this huge government programs,
Speaker 1: expansion of everything, but she doesn't. Never, she never wants
Speaker 1: to follow the goidelines and rules herself. And and one
Speaker 1: example of her berating me in front of the Oval
Speaker 1: office because she can't leave thirty people inside the Oval
Speaker 1: office unescored when the president is not there. Um, and
Speaker 1: those are the you know, those are rules and the
Speaker 1: national security rules based on national security law. But she
Speaker 1: they're not for her because she's special. And um, you
Speaker 1: know it's meant one of many things that I talked
Speaker 1: about in my book. But yeah, it's two standards. They
Speaker 1: never want to do what the rules are. They just
Speaker 1: want to do whatever they want to do. She's like
Speaker 1: a dictator. And I experienced many of those things my
Speaker 1: time there. Yeah, and then you have explained many times
Speaker 1: this real quick because we gotta go. Yeah, Gary's a
Speaker 1: credible guy. Any of these former agents who are saying
Speaker 1: he's not are totally full of it. What he says
Speaker 1: in that You may not agree with his book, but
Speaker 1: he is absolutely credible office. I can vouch for him.
Speaker 1: Let me ask you this so your your campaign. I
Speaker 1: understand that coming after you because you're anti establishment, although
Speaker 1: I think that district needs an anti establishment congressman. How
Speaker 1: are things of the race and how can people if
Speaker 1: they're down in Southwest Florida listening to Fox. How can
Speaker 1: they help you? Yeah, they can go to Bongino, b O,
Speaker 1: n G I n O dot com And yeah, I
Speaker 1: appreciate it. Sean. Need some more arson to set some
Speaker 1: darned fires for conservatism. We need to start. Sorry, We're
Speaker 1: gonna have to get you to run next Yeah, alright,
Speaker 1: so dung oh my Fox News Radio five friends out
Speaker 1: down in Fort Myers and Naples. Dan Bongino is one
Speaker 1: of this primary August thirty. But votes are in the
Speaker 1: mail right now. I vote by mail. People have their
Speaker 1: ballots in the House that they requested to vote by map.
Speaker 1: All right, thanks so much, Dan Bongino, and of course
Speaker 1: Gary Burns. Let's get to our busy, busy telephones here.
Speaker 1: Let's go to Stewart in Missouri. Stuart, Hi, how are
Speaker 1: you glad you called sir? Hey, so thanks to take
Speaker 1: him on call. Thank you for calling. Hey, I'm just
Speaker 1: to go to work. I don't I can't speak to
Speaker 1: the U to the world of the public because you
Speaker 1: have that media, and I appreciate you for doing that.
Speaker 1: But those people who are never Trumpers, they need to
Speaker 1: get in behind the Republican candidate, the one the people
Speaker 1: have spoken U the people that are there, the elitist
Speaker 1: that we sent in the Washington to do a job,
Speaker 1: and they are supposed to represent us, the people. We
Speaker 1: the people have spoken, We've said Donald Trump needs to
Speaker 1: be where he's at. They get on, get out, you know.
Speaker 1: That's the way it is. They do the job. Represent
Speaker 1: the people that sent them there, the people that have
Speaker 1: spoken and said that Donald Trump, you know, deserves a
Speaker 1: shot to get it done. They could just pack their
Speaker 1: vaginy go back home. That's just the way it should be. Just.
Speaker 1: I do think there's a certain elitism, a certain arrogance
Speaker 1: among these people, not all of them. That look, I
Speaker 1: have friends that are principal people that absolutely positively just
Speaker 1: see things differently than me, good friends of mine. Um.
Speaker 1: I respect where they are coming from. But that's you know,
Speaker 1: all these years, all of these rhinos that have been
Speaker 1: rammed down our throat by these very same loser establishment types.
Speaker 1: Now they're mad at the American people. Well, the American
Speaker 1: people and Republicans in particular. Six of them are angry,
Speaker 1: and they're angry and they feel betrayed, and they feel
Speaker 1: betrayed for good reason. They feel betrayed because they were
Speaker 1: made promises by Republicans that were never fulfilled. If Republicans
Speaker 1: had no intention to fulfilling the promises, they shouldn't have
Speaker 1: made the promises in the first place. And it goes
Speaker 1: from everything to controlling spending in the power of the Purse,
Speaker 1: which they promised if they got control of Congress back.
Speaker 1: It goes to defunding Obamacare the aspects that they were
Speaker 1: capable of doing and they didn't. It goes toeen stopping
Speaker 1: what they said was illegal, unconstitutional executive amnesty. It's also
Speaker 1: literally taking their enumerated powers in the Constitution and ceding
Speaker 1: them to the legislative branch because it's too inconvenient for
Speaker 1: them to stand up and take a risk for the
Speaker 1: principles they say that they adhere to, and they wouldn't
Speaker 1: do that either. So the American people, they've they've made
Speaker 1: Republicans in particularly made a course correction. I don't think
Speaker 1: they made a bad decision. I think they made the
Speaker 1: right decision. As I look back and I look at
Speaker 1: all the other sixteen candidates that are in this race
Speaker 1: that are running, I don't know anyone that would do
Speaker 1: any better than Donald Trump. Now Unfortunately, you don't have
Speaker 1: the option of saying, well, if this person won, this
Speaker 1: person would have won the election. You just don't have
Speaker 1: that luxury. So Donald Trump is the nominee of the
Speaker 1: Republican voter, not of the Republican establishment. They did the
Speaker 1: voters didn't listen to the National Review, they didn't listen
Speaker 1: to the Wall Street Journal, they didn't listen to Bill
Speaker 1: Crystal and the Weekly Standard. They listened to their own gut,
Speaker 1: in their own heart, and they made a decision that
Speaker 1: was made in part by how badly Republicans have done.
Speaker 1: And I think they're saying, you know what, we are
Speaker 1: losing jobs. You know what, Manufacturing is declining. You know what,
Speaker 1: it's stupid. We're not energy independent. You know what. There
Speaker 1: is a lot of Republicans out there that want open
Speaker 1: borders because they're big buddies, their financial buddies are benefiting
Speaker 1: from cheap labor, and they're not considering the American worker
Speaker 1: that's getting screwed. So I think in that sense, they've
Speaker 1: paid that price. So we'll see what happens. Al Right,
Speaker 1: My friend, God bless you. Hey, my good friend Catherine
Speaker 1: prudome O'Brien is with us. You may remember years ago,
Speaker 1: when did I first have you on I don't even
Speaker 1: remember all the controversies. You were out of town hall.
Speaker 1: And what was the first question you asked the first
Speaker 1: time I interviewed you? Okay, I asked um, I asked
Speaker 1: l Gore if he believed we need to broderick. That
Speaker 1: was wow, And that was the first time. And he
Speaker 1: didn't answer the question, did he No, He answered it
Speaker 1: as if I had asked about consensual relationships. And I
Speaker 1: was very polite and just sat down to thank you.
Speaker 1: But since then I've realized that and soon after that,
Speaker 1: that's a strategy that that's being used, that they only
Speaker 1: answered questions about sexual assault by Bill Clinton as if
Speaker 1: you're asking about consensual relationships. Yeah, I mean, it's amazing
Speaker 1: that you know, has Hillary been asked that question? I mean,
Speaker 1: the woman that said women who are assaulted have a
Speaker 1: right to be believed. Well, I did try to ask
Speaker 1: her that in January. She and I asked her a
Speaker 1: few times prior to that, and she told me she
Speaker 1: doesn't let me play because we have that audio. Let's
Speaker 1: put it up for people. Let's start with the questions
Speaker 1: and I'll try to get as many in just just
Speaker 1: just well, I'm gonna call on people. I'm gonna wait
Speaker 1: a minute. I'm not going to take your question because
Speaker 1: other people have been raped. Yes, go right there, Okay,
Speaker 1: let me see that right back there, that this man
Speaker 1: right there and that here we go right there. You
Speaker 1: are very rude and I'm not going to ever call
Speaker 1: on you. Thank you. I thank you that I asked
Speaker 1: him how in the world she can give me? How
Speaker 1: in the world she can say that we need Kathleen
Speaker 1: William lying when she has no idea who we need
Speaker 1: to brought her this because she told me this summer
Speaker 1: that she doesn't know who she is and she doesn't
Speaker 1: want to know who she is, and how could she
Speaker 1: assess that they're lying, which is what she told someone
Speaker 1: last month? And she says, she says, isn't that rape
Speaker 1: victims should be believed? I agree with that. That's truth.
Speaker 1: They should be believe and you should assess what they're saying.
Speaker 1: She doesn't even want to assess it. Why does she
Speaker 1: matter to you? Take summer raps five for my son,
Speaker 1: who's would man to as Steve representatively of Stitus tell
Speaker 1: me that they're drug out excited because of my say
Speaker 1: Essentially salted. Look at how would I not care about that?
Speaker 1: You're a Republican though, coming in here to come in
Speaker 1: here to question her though, coming here to question her
Speaker 1: in an event, putting her on the spot like that
Speaker 1: makes her look, you know, not not in a perfect light.
Speaker 1: Is that your goal with your goal maker looks so democratic? Okay,
Speaker 1: a Republican because of this, because of this stuff, because
Speaker 1: of what I saw, how the clintic in the Clinton
Speaker 1: is that this was hypocrisy of the so called women
Speaker 1: that fight for women. It was. It was the height
Speaker 1: of hypocrisy anyway, Catherine. I mean, I've always admired your
Speaker 1: courage and that actually, you know, vaulted you into a
Speaker 1: political career yourself. And how many years were your state representative? Well,
Speaker 1: I'm in my second year and I'm running for re election,
Speaker 1: so that's coming up the primary. Well, if it doesn't
Speaker 1: hurt you, I endorse you because I love your courage.
Speaker 1: You know, what are you? What are your take on
Speaker 1: this whole Donald Trump establishment. You've got all the n
Speaker 1: r O guys, the Weekly Standard guys of the Wall
Speaker 1: Street Journal guys, but yet more voters in the Republican
Speaker 1: Party that feel betrayed they're they're out there. They wanted
Speaker 1: him to be their nominee. But now you've got not
Speaker 1: only the elite arrogant, uh you know, I guess intellectual
Speaker 1: classes they consider themselves, but then you've got the politicians
Speaker 1: as well that they are undermining and sabotaging as best
Speaker 1: they can. What's your take on it. I think that's
Speaker 1: not a good strategy for the Republicans. It's it's left
Speaker 1: too many people feeling like they don't have a voice.
Speaker 1: And that's that's part of why I ran. Was I
Speaker 1: had so many friends and family that were frustrated, feeling
Speaker 1: like Republicans were not not hearing them. And the only
Speaker 1: thing I could say was, Okay, I'll try. I'll try. Okay,
Speaker 1: you know what, I'll run so they you know, the
Speaker 1: Republican elites really have nowhere to turn if they're looking
Speaker 1: for blame other than the Mira Well, I agree with that.
Speaker 1: And you know what if if Hillary wins and Hillary
Speaker 1: picks the Supreme Court nominee, guess what, I'm blaming them.
Speaker 1: I'm blaming their sabotage. I'm blaming them looking out only
Speaker 1: for their own self interest. I'm blaming them for insisting
Speaker 1: every single election. We keep doing the same dumb thing,
Speaker 1: which is lose with an establishment candidate that is weak
Speaker 1: and timid and politically correct and afraid. And to me,
Speaker 1: there's there's so much. There's such an incestuous atmosphere that
Speaker 1: goes on in Washington. People do not grasp this that
Speaker 1: you have. I mean, you've got the campaigns, then you've
Speaker 1: got the campaign staffers, then you've got the congressman, then
Speaker 1: you got the congressional staffers, then you've got the media.
Speaker 1: And they all go out and they all hang out together,
Speaker 1: and they all go to dinner together, and they all
Speaker 1: go drinking together, and they all do favors for each other,
Speaker 1: and they also, you do this for me, and I'll
Speaker 1: do this for you. And in the meantime, there's this
Speaker 1: whole rest of the country that is out of work,
Speaker 1: in poverty, out of the labor force, on food stamps,
Speaker 1: not being able to buy a house, not engaged in
Speaker 1: any sort of recovery, and nobody cares about them. Well,
Speaker 1: I care about them. I don't care about these people.
Speaker 1: There's a lot of people with no voice. I think
Speaker 1: that's well set. And Sean, I I really wanted to
Speaker 1: tell you how much I appreciate you talking about Kathy Shelton.
Speaker 1: So the woman who's Hillary defended the man who raped
Speaker 1: her and bragged about it, that was chilling, laughed. She
Speaker 1: knew the man was guilty, and that in the way
Speaker 1: she defended him anyway, even though she knew he was guilty,
Speaker 1: was abominable, and she was you know, I just can't
Speaker 1: believe it. I don't know why this is not a
Speaker 1: larger story than it is. If if it was, I
Speaker 1: don't can't really passed the light detector testing. It forever
Speaker 1: killed my faith in light detector test. Mean, And she
Speaker 1: knew it was guilty, yes, and the guy that raped
Speaker 1: a twelve year old little girl. So the things that
Speaker 1: she said about the woman as well, that the woman
Speaker 1: was fantasizing, that she was from a disorganized family intended
Speaker 1: to make things up with whatever. People who came from
Speaker 1: divorced families, who children at war families should should be
Speaker 1: insulted by that. And it sounds to me like Hillary
Speaker 1: would just say anything possible to get her clients off.
Speaker 1: She clearly she clearly didn't have a problem ethically or
Speaker 1: morally and getting off a guy that she believed was
Speaker 1: guilty of raping a twelve year old girl. But listen,
Speaker 1: she's still a champion of women's rights. She's she's still
Speaker 1: know Mitt Romney who had binders of women's resumes, that's
Speaker 1: for sure. Anyway, Catherine, appreciate it. Thank you. Good to
Speaker 1: talk to you as always. Uh Nick and Vegas and
Speaker 1: he's ONKDON radio. What's up, Nick? How are you? Sir? Hello? Sean,
Speaker 1: thank you for what you do. Really quick. As a
Speaker 1: former refugee, I like to extend my support to Mr
Speaker 1: Trump's policy for temporary ban on refugees coming from the
Speaker 1: States that harvard terrorism and cannot be vetted. Not only
Speaker 1: I don't find it to be racist, I find it
Speaker 1: to be an American obligation by our leaders. In my opinion,
Speaker 1: sean refugee is someone who wants to be refuged, either
Speaker 1: from religious or political persecution. I my heart and solemn sympathy.
Speaker 1: Nick goes out to your an Iranian refugee, and you
Speaker 1: know it broke my heart. Back in two thousand and nine,
Speaker 1: where I thought President Obama abandoned the green movement there
Speaker 1: and young people that were risking their lives and taking
Speaker 1: to the streets, and all they were doing was quoting
Speaker 1: Lincoln and and Washington and our framers and founders, and
Speaker 1: they got no support. Um, you do understand, for example,
Speaker 1: and I have sympathy for the Syrians. I have sympathy
Speaker 1: for those caught up in a civil war. I'm all
Speaker 1: in favor of providing a safe zone for them where
Speaker 1: American military and other coalition members can can protect these
Speaker 1: families that have been pushed out of their home by
Speaker 1: ISIS and are being slaughtered. And that means Christians and Muslims,
Speaker 1: anybody else. And remember some people are taught to hate America.
Speaker 1: But my point to is this, but if we can't
Speaker 1: vet those people coming here, and our top intelligence officials
Speaker 1: say that in fact, ISIS and terrorists will infiltrate the
Speaker 1: refugee population, we can't risk American lives. You understand that,
Speaker 1: Sean a looking and this is nothing new. I escaped
Speaker 1: from your own at a very young age. A thirty
Speaker 1: years ago, I must say. I came to my beloved
Speaker 1: US A legally with the supporter of US embassy. Soon
Speaker 1: after revolution, my sister was kidnapped by husband. They broke
Speaker 1: into her home, beat up my brother in law and
Speaker 1: took her away. But didn't know where she was for
Speaker 1: six months. She had a one month old baby. My
Speaker 1: father was fired and his assets were seized unless he
Speaker 1: converted to Islam. He chose not to. They used to
Speaker 1: call my dad every Friday now and then and they
Speaker 1: would say, if we just executed your daughter, come and
Speaker 1: take her body. My dad all frantic in crying going there,
Speaker 1: and they would say, ha ha ha, we haven't killed
Speaker 1: her yet. Come back next week. My father got sick,
Speaker 1: he needed medical attention outside the US. They refused to
Speaker 1: issue passport unless he converted to Islam. Once again, this
Speaker 1: great man chose not to. They didn't let my dad
Speaker 1: to be buried. My mother had to wash and clean
Speaker 1: his body at the apartment and bury him in the
Speaker 1: desert while I was in USA. You see, Sean, I
Speaker 1: can go on and on and on about the education
Speaker 1: that was denied to me, my Salcer dreams that were shattered,
Speaker 1: my cousin who was on the national team of weightlifting
Speaker 1: that was kicked out of the national team Olympic medalists
Speaker 1: for not converting to Islam. When I hear folks like
Speaker 1: Mr Khan share their view from a narrow lens, I
Speaker 1: want my fellow Americans to now Sean. Religious persecution by
Speaker 1: Islamic states is nothing new to me. Maybe to some Americans,
Speaker 1: but not to me. I was a young Democrat, okay
Speaker 1: in my early years here in US. Surprise surprise, right,
Speaker 1: because Republicans couldn't get to me. Shame on them too, because,
Speaker 1: like many, I was delivered and given some wrong information.
Speaker 1: That paramuture was deceived and manipulated. But my father, Sean,
Speaker 1: you know what he had taught me a good lesson
Speaker 1: that I have to do my own research. That's why
Speaker 1: I've been a Conservative for the past sixteen years. I
Speaker 1: have been and I will always be because I've seen
Speaker 1: how menulative, manipulative, these people can be. So this ideology
Speaker 1: that Mr Khan says, oh, there is no such a
Speaker 1: thing as shareo or this or that. I have a
Speaker 1: lot of Muslim friends. I have Muslim friends, Sean, as
Speaker 1: you know, many of them have submitted themselves to United
Speaker 1: States Constitution. There is a direct conflict between sharing you
Speaker 1: on Constitution. It's a cultural conflict that people are, you know,
Speaker 1: being There's no reconciling. There's no reconciling Shariah with the
Speaker 1: United States Constitution, which is our rule of law. Listen,
Speaker 1: thank you, for sharing your story, and I hope people
Speaker 1: heard you. I wish I had more time because I
Speaker 1: could listen to your story for the rest of the day,
Speaker 1: and I do appreciate you sharing it with everybody.