WEBVTT - Mathieu Chabran on Using Creativity to Compete

0:00:02.040 --> 0:00:08.200
<v Speaker 1>This is Master's in Business with Barry Ridholds on Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:09.200 --> 0:00:12.639
<v Speaker 2>This week on the podcast, I have an extra special guest.

0:00:13.160 --> 0:00:17.400
<v Speaker 2>Matthew Chebron is the co founder of TKO Capital, a

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:22.520
<v Speaker 2>Paris based alternative asset manager. They run over forty billion

0:00:22.560 --> 0:00:26.000
<v Speaker 2>dollars worth of assets. I found this to be really

0:00:26.040 --> 0:00:32.280
<v Speaker 2>a fascinating conversation about approaching the world of investing from

0:00:32.560 --> 0:00:36.120
<v Speaker 2>a different angle, being creative, thinking out of the box,

0:00:36.840 --> 0:00:40.720
<v Speaker 2>looking to not just imitate what other people do, but

0:00:40.920 --> 0:00:45.000
<v Speaker 2>create new opportunities by just thinking about the world differently.

0:00:45.479 --> 0:00:49.640
<v Speaker 2>The conversation was really informative and quite fascinating. I thought

0:00:49.640 --> 0:00:51.839
<v Speaker 2>it was great and I think you will also with

0:00:52.040 --> 0:00:55.880
<v Speaker 2>no further ado my conversation with TKO Capitals.

0:00:56.320 --> 0:00:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Matthew Chebron, Thank you, Baron.

0:00:58.920 --> 0:01:02.720
<v Speaker 2>I forgot to mention you have received the Chevalier de

0:01:02.840 --> 0:01:07.480
<v Speaker 2>l'Ordre de la legend Anna by the President of the

0:01:07.480 --> 0:01:11.720
<v Speaker 2>French Republic in January twenty twenty two. We'll circle back

0:01:11.760 --> 0:01:13.520
<v Speaker 2>to that at some other point. I don't know how

0:01:13.560 --> 0:01:16.760
<v Speaker 2>relevant that is to asset management, but let's talk a

0:01:16.760 --> 0:01:19.960
<v Speaker 2>little bit about what you were doing before you were

0:01:20.080 --> 0:01:23.479
<v Speaker 2>being lauded by the French president. You went to school

0:01:23.520 --> 0:01:26.679
<v Speaker 2>in Paris, but you began your career in London at

0:01:26.720 --> 0:01:29.920
<v Speaker 2>Maryland Deutsche Bank. Tell us a little bit about that background.

0:01:30.120 --> 0:01:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, no, that's right, Barry. You know, it's that's one

0:01:32.920 --> 0:01:33.319
<v Speaker 1>thing you know.

0:01:33.480 --> 0:01:34.840
<v Speaker 3>In Europe where.

0:01:36.600 --> 0:01:40.920
<v Speaker 4>London was and actually think still remain, you know, the

0:01:40.959 --> 0:01:43.440
<v Speaker 4>one place where you know you want to get exposure

0:01:43.480 --> 0:01:46.679
<v Speaker 4>when you join financial services. So I was lucky to

0:01:46.720 --> 0:01:50.880
<v Speaker 4>get this summer internship at Marylynch back in the late nineties.

0:01:52.040 --> 0:01:55.760
<v Speaker 4>I met Antoine effectively my co founding partner, So that

0:01:55.880 --> 0:01:58.600
<v Speaker 4>was you know, a while back, but nonetheless, you know,

0:01:58.600 --> 0:02:01.360
<v Speaker 4>if it was love at first sight, but we got

0:02:01.400 --> 0:02:04.600
<v Speaker 4>to get along, you know, pretty well, and after a

0:02:04.640 --> 0:02:08.600
<v Speaker 4>few years working for investment banks, he then joined Goldman Sacks.

0:02:08.600 --> 0:02:11.040
<v Speaker 4>I joined effectively Dutch Bank. We decided, you know, to

0:02:11.120 --> 0:02:14.360
<v Speaker 4>try to have a go on our own. We were

0:02:14.720 --> 0:02:20.520
<v Speaker 4>twenty eight thirty respectively, and looking backwards as much as

0:02:20.600 --> 0:02:25.920
<v Speaker 4>investment banking, even with banks that no longer there was great.

0:02:25.960 --> 0:02:29.040
<v Speaker 4>You know, that was a great training. I think it

0:02:29.080 --> 0:02:31.040
<v Speaker 4>was a great training. I think you know, we learned

0:02:31.080 --> 0:02:36.239
<v Speaker 4>a lot. The exposure you know, you get in investment banking.

0:02:36.240 --> 0:02:39.840
<v Speaker 4>I was a leverage finance banker by background, and so

0:02:40.000 --> 0:02:43.400
<v Speaker 4>late nineties that the emergence of the high yield market

0:02:43.440 --> 0:02:46.920
<v Speaker 4>in Europe. You would print deals, you know, like never before.

0:02:46.960 --> 0:02:50.320
<v Speaker 4>You get this exposure. You're a young analyst associate. You

0:02:50.400 --> 0:02:52.440
<v Speaker 4>get to go on the road show with management teams.

0:02:52.880 --> 0:02:54.359
<v Speaker 4>You know, I look backwards, that was a hell of

0:02:54.360 --> 0:02:56.640
<v Speaker 4>for training. You know, in terms of the exposure.

0:02:56.720 --> 0:02:58.680
<v Speaker 2>I can imagine was the plan when you were going

0:02:58.680 --> 0:03:01.640
<v Speaker 2>to school in Paris ways to go into finance or

0:03:02.040 --> 0:03:04.000
<v Speaker 2>were you originally leaning another direction?

0:03:04.320 --> 0:03:07.359
<v Speaker 4>In a prior to joining a business school in Paris,

0:03:07.400 --> 0:03:11.280
<v Speaker 4>I studied political sciences in my native Provence, you know,

0:03:11.320 --> 0:03:15.519
<v Speaker 4>in excellent province, and there was no hint at the time,

0:03:15.560 --> 0:03:17.720
<v Speaker 4>you know that I would be heading into into finance.

0:03:18.840 --> 0:03:21.760
<v Speaker 4>And so when I then got the exposure and getting

0:03:21.800 --> 0:03:25.000
<v Speaker 4>to learn with the great teachers, by the way, what

0:03:25.280 --> 0:03:27.400
<v Speaker 4>and again went back in you know, in the late nineties.

0:03:27.440 --> 0:03:30.480
<v Speaker 4>But then you start reading books and I'm not talking

0:03:30.480 --> 0:03:34.680
<v Speaker 4>about the theoretical books, but you know some experience, you know,

0:03:34.720 --> 0:03:37.280
<v Speaker 4>the people I remember these books, you know, reading the

0:03:38.480 --> 0:03:41.680
<v Speaker 4>you know Lias Poker from Michael Lewis, you know, reading

0:03:41.720 --> 0:03:44.720
<v Speaker 4>a Predator's Ball, you know about the milk and junk

0:03:44.720 --> 0:03:47.240
<v Speaker 4>bond and that's where you know, the excitement started and

0:03:47.240 --> 0:03:49.360
<v Speaker 4>you're like, you know, I have to get exposure to that.

0:03:49.920 --> 0:03:53.320
<v Speaker 4>So no, there was nothing written, but it was a

0:03:53.360 --> 0:03:53.960
<v Speaker 4>great step.

0:03:54.440 --> 0:03:59.200
<v Speaker 2>So fast forward to today. You now work in a

0:03:59.280 --> 0:04:02.280
<v Speaker 2>large European firm in the USA, but really you began

0:04:02.360 --> 0:04:06.400
<v Speaker 2>your career at big American firms in London.

0:04:06.480 --> 0:04:06.920
<v Speaker 1>That's right.

0:04:07.000 --> 0:04:10.400
<v Speaker 2>What are the cultural differences, like a US firm in

0:04:10.440 --> 0:04:12.560
<v Speaker 2>Europe versus European firm in the US.

0:04:13.080 --> 0:04:17.520
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, well it's an interesting, interesting question looking from the US.

0:04:17.600 --> 0:04:19.680
<v Speaker 4>But you know, at times, you know, Europe you know,

0:04:19.760 --> 0:04:22.560
<v Speaker 4>may may be an easy concept, but it's a very

0:04:22.600 --> 0:04:26.880
<v Speaker 4>complex reality. And so doing business in Europe is obviously

0:04:26.920 --> 0:04:30.320
<v Speaker 4>you know, it's all about being local because Italy is

0:04:30.360 --> 0:04:32.560
<v Speaker 4>not Spain, France is not you know, Germany. You know,

0:04:32.600 --> 0:04:35.479
<v Speaker 4>at times people in London think that they cover in

0:04:35.600 --> 0:04:40.000
<v Speaker 4>the whole European playfield. But again it's a complex reality.

0:04:40.040 --> 0:04:43.200
<v Speaker 4>So having met people back then, you know, Americans working

0:04:43.240 --> 0:04:46.839
<v Speaker 4>for these US banks, you know, now they understand that

0:04:46.960 --> 0:04:49.800
<v Speaker 4>and the one successful and even some of for you

0:04:49.839 --> 0:04:55.880
<v Speaker 4>know peers competitors friends American franchise who are competing and

0:04:55.960 --> 0:04:59.400
<v Speaker 4>tackling the European market. Very often the one successful and

0:04:59.480 --> 0:05:01.560
<v Speaker 4>very SUCCESSFU are the one who've been, you know, spending

0:05:01.600 --> 0:05:03.479
<v Speaker 4>a lot of time you know, on the ground, and

0:05:03.520 --> 0:05:07.359
<v Speaker 4>then on the contrary, hopefully having worked for US franchise,

0:05:07.400 --> 0:05:11.039
<v Speaker 4>having spent time with the people and great mentors. You know,

0:05:11.120 --> 0:05:15.039
<v Speaker 4>for me, I now can hopefully understand better, you know,

0:05:15.040 --> 0:05:18.719
<v Speaker 4>the cultural difference, you know, as we expand here and

0:05:18.800 --> 0:05:20.400
<v Speaker 4>as I'm sure you know you would appreciate, you know,

0:05:20.480 --> 0:05:23.960
<v Speaker 4>being here in New York is a very different reality

0:05:24.000 --> 0:05:27.800
<v Speaker 4>than the rest of the the Americas, partly when it

0:05:27.839 --> 0:05:31.400
<v Speaker 4>comes down to visiting new clients. You know, in the Midwest,

0:05:31.400 --> 0:05:33.240
<v Speaker 4>you know there are you know, the part you know

0:05:33.279 --> 0:05:35.520
<v Speaker 4>of the of the US. So hopefully there's a bit

0:05:35.560 --> 0:05:38.000
<v Speaker 4>of convergence here, you know, to make it worthwhile.

0:05:38.080 --> 0:05:40.240
<v Speaker 2>I love the old spoiling great quote. I don't live

0:05:40.279 --> 0:05:42.200
<v Speaker 2>in America. I live in a small island off the

0:05:42.200 --> 0:05:45.880
<v Speaker 2>east coast of America. Because to your point, New York

0:05:45.960 --> 0:05:48.240
<v Speaker 2>is in Kansas City, and Kansas City is in Miami.

0:05:48.480 --> 0:05:50.880
<v Speaker 1>But New York is definitely its own creature.

0:05:51.200 --> 0:05:53.760
<v Speaker 4>It is for sure, and you know, for us at TIKO,

0:05:53.920 --> 0:05:57.480
<v Speaker 4>it's been an important step to to open and expand

0:05:57.520 --> 0:05:58.440
<v Speaker 4>here in North America.

0:05:58.760 --> 0:05:59.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, just background.

0:06:00.440 --> 0:06:04.400
<v Speaker 4>When I moved here five years ago this year in

0:06:04.440 --> 0:06:08.240
<v Speaker 4>twenty eighteen, you know, we had barely know relationships in

0:06:08.279 --> 0:06:11.920
<v Speaker 4>North America. We had made a few investments relationship from

0:06:11.920 --> 0:06:13.839
<v Speaker 4>a client standpoint, I mean fromn lpea standpoint.

0:06:14.640 --> 0:06:15.760
<v Speaker 1>And fast forward.

0:06:15.839 --> 0:06:17.600
<v Speaker 4>You know today is close to ten percent of houra

0:06:17.920 --> 0:06:19.720
<v Speaker 4>a um that we have raised here. You know, we

0:06:19.800 --> 0:06:22.719
<v Speaker 4>launch new initiatives, We try not to be differentiating, and

0:06:22.760 --> 0:06:24.719
<v Speaker 4>obviously it's a long term game and you have to

0:06:24.760 --> 0:06:29.360
<v Speaker 4>be definitely long term greedy when you set up a business,

0:06:29.400 --> 0:06:31.760
<v Speaker 4>you know, in the in the US, but in the

0:06:31.800 --> 0:06:34.920
<v Speaker 4>business we're in today, in the alternative asset management space

0:06:35.640 --> 0:06:36.960
<v Speaker 4>as competitive it can be.

0:06:37.040 --> 0:06:37.800
<v Speaker 3>But you know, the.

0:06:37.760 --> 0:06:41.840
<v Speaker 4>Structural opportunity now is such that the commitment as a

0:06:41.880 --> 0:06:44.080
<v Speaker 4>eure open that you have to make here has to

0:06:44.080 --> 0:06:46.240
<v Speaker 4>be long term. I made the commitment, you know, personally,

0:06:46.640 --> 0:06:48.320
<v Speaker 4>and I can see the path, you know, because there

0:06:48.360 --> 0:06:49.960
<v Speaker 4>is room to expand the business.

0:06:50.040 --> 0:06:52.960
<v Speaker 2>So let's talk about what led to the decision to

0:06:53.080 --> 0:06:56.680
<v Speaker 2>launch TKO Capital back in two thousand and four. Your

0:06:56.800 --> 0:06:59.440
<v Speaker 2>Deutsche Bank, your colleague ant One is a Goldman Sachs.

0:07:00.200 --> 0:07:02.440
<v Speaker 2>What made you say, hey, let's get the band back

0:07:02.480 --> 0:07:03.119
<v Speaker 2>together again.

0:07:03.440 --> 0:07:05.320
<v Speaker 4>Well, you know what, it's actually back to what I was,

0:07:05.320 --> 0:07:08.840
<v Speaker 4>you know, just saying, we were watching all these franchise

0:07:09.080 --> 0:07:11.880
<v Speaker 4>being launched, and obviously at the top of them, you know,

0:07:11.880 --> 0:07:13.440
<v Speaker 4>all the one you can think of, who are you know,

0:07:13.520 --> 0:07:16.560
<v Speaker 4>leading the industry today, But back then they were you know,

0:07:16.600 --> 0:07:20.200
<v Speaker 4>managing you a few tens of billions of dollars, which

0:07:20.320 --> 0:07:23.600
<v Speaker 4>was you know, enormous back then, based only a fraction

0:07:23.640 --> 0:07:25.840
<v Speaker 4>of what they are today. And we were seeing all

0:07:25.880 --> 0:07:30.200
<v Speaker 4>these American franchise, you know, launching in in Europe, you know,

0:07:30.240 --> 0:07:32.040
<v Speaker 4>out of London, and we're like, you know, why don't

0:07:32.040 --> 0:07:32.560
<v Speaker 4>we give you a go?

0:07:32.760 --> 0:07:33.200
<v Speaker 3>I mean, we.

0:07:33.240 --> 0:07:36.120
<v Speaker 4>Learned leverage finance, we learned you know, real estate that

0:07:36.280 --> 0:07:39.440
<v Speaker 4>we knew, how yield we knew, you know, opportunittic investment,

0:07:40.280 --> 0:07:43.680
<v Speaker 4>and we're like, it's never too late, it's never too early,

0:07:44.240 --> 0:07:47.560
<v Speaker 4>and we decided to go with you know, a huge

0:07:47.640 --> 0:07:51.720
<v Speaker 4>four million aum that we had gathered from friends and family.

0:07:52.120 --> 0:07:54.240
<v Speaker 4>So you can appreciate, you know, the challenge back then,

0:07:54.360 --> 0:07:56.360
<v Speaker 4>but you have to start somewhere.

0:07:56.040 --> 0:07:59.040
<v Speaker 2>Right that that's walking around cash back back then. So

0:07:59.120 --> 0:08:01.640
<v Speaker 2>let's talk about not too late, not too early. You

0:08:01.800 --> 0:08:06.360
<v Speaker 2>launch right after the dot com enplosure, correct, but a

0:08:06.360 --> 0:08:09.239
<v Speaker 2>few years before the Great Financial Crisis?

0:08:09.280 --> 0:08:09.400
<v Speaker 3>Right?

0:08:09.760 --> 0:08:12.560
<v Speaker 2>What was that period like? What was that lull like

0:08:12.680 --> 0:08:16.960
<v Speaker 2>between those two giant volatility events.

0:08:19.120 --> 0:08:21.880
<v Speaker 4>It was an experience because you know, the dot com bubble.

0:08:21.920 --> 0:08:24.600
<v Speaker 4>I remember being a young associate at Merrill Lynch and

0:08:24.680 --> 0:08:28.120
<v Speaker 4>all the investment bank they had to reinvent themselves, you know,

0:08:28.160 --> 0:08:31.160
<v Speaker 4>to make sure they could remember this retain talent, you

0:08:31.160 --> 0:08:33.040
<v Speaker 4>know that we've been hearing, you know lately again, you know,

0:08:33.080 --> 0:08:36.840
<v Speaker 4>And so they were creating some cool working space and

0:08:37.440 --> 0:08:39.440
<v Speaker 4>you would no longer you know, wear a tie and

0:08:39.480 --> 0:08:42.480
<v Speaker 4>all that, which was all form of a substance. And

0:08:42.559 --> 0:08:44.480
<v Speaker 4>as if there was a shift. And then you have

0:08:44.600 --> 0:08:46.960
<v Speaker 4>this ramp up from effective VO four when we launched

0:08:46.960 --> 0:08:51.079
<v Speaker 4>to the GFC and we're three years, four years into business,

0:08:51.080 --> 0:08:53.520
<v Speaker 4>you know at TKO, and I remember, you know, we

0:08:53.600 --> 0:08:56.120
<v Speaker 4>feel extremely proud because then we were banking, you know,

0:08:56.160 --> 0:08:59.000
<v Speaker 4>with Beochtern. So we're banking with Lehman Brothers. And that

0:08:59.120 --> 0:09:01.920
<v Speaker 4>was you know a step in the entrepreneurial development. And

0:09:01.960 --> 0:09:04.959
<v Speaker 4>then all of a sudden, over the weekend, those banks

0:09:04.960 --> 0:09:07.960
<v Speaker 4>are gone, and so you're like a young entrepreneur leaving

0:09:08.080 --> 0:09:13.480
<v Speaker 4>this nearness experience despite thinking that you were close to

0:09:13.600 --> 0:09:16.559
<v Speaker 4>certainty because you were working with the best institution and

0:09:16.600 --> 0:09:18.920
<v Speaker 4>counter party you can think of. And then all of

0:09:18.960 --> 0:09:21.280
<v Speaker 4>a sudden, it's all about how you see and look

0:09:21.320 --> 0:09:25.040
<v Speaker 4>at the world. Never take anything for granted, always be,

0:09:25.160 --> 0:09:28.640
<v Speaker 4>you know, in the world of challenging everything. So it's

0:09:28.679 --> 0:09:31.959
<v Speaker 4>not good for your stomach pain, you know, every morning,

0:09:32.360 --> 0:09:34.480
<v Speaker 4>but only the paranoid survive. And I think that was

0:09:34.520 --> 0:09:35.920
<v Speaker 4>a great learning experience.

0:09:36.200 --> 0:09:39.720
<v Speaker 2>So let's talk about what took place post bear Stearns

0:09:39.720 --> 0:09:43.960
<v Speaker 2>and post Liman From a business perspective, bear Stearns gets

0:09:43.960 --> 0:09:48.680
<v Speaker 2>absorbed into JP Morgan Chase, so your contacts at bear

0:09:48.720 --> 0:09:52.319
<v Speaker 2>Stearns are still in business. The best parts of Liman

0:09:52.400 --> 0:09:55.679
<v Speaker 2>brother get absorbed into Barclay. So I got to imagine

0:09:55.800 --> 0:09:57.520
<v Speaker 2>a lot of the folks you were doing business with

0:09:57.640 --> 0:10:00.560
<v Speaker 2>at those places landed on their feet and you still

0:10:00.559 --> 0:10:04.240
<v Speaker 2>had some relationship or am I being too sanguine about no?

0:10:04.320 --> 0:10:07.520
<v Speaker 4>No, there was a bit of all of the above.

0:10:07.559 --> 0:10:09.520
<v Speaker 4>But more importantly for us, you know in Aura, you

0:10:09.559 --> 0:10:11.760
<v Speaker 4>know development, As I said, it was about you know,

0:10:12.600 --> 0:10:16.199
<v Speaker 4>never taking anything for granting and granted because you know,

0:10:16.280 --> 0:10:19.200
<v Speaker 4>Lehman Brothers. Is what a single a rated bank on

0:10:19.240 --> 0:10:21.120
<v Speaker 4>the Friday night and it's defaulted, you know, on.

0:10:21.080 --> 0:10:21.840
<v Speaker 3>The Monday morning.

0:10:22.320 --> 0:10:24.880
<v Speaker 4>And even if I'm sketching a bit, you know, from

0:10:24.920 --> 0:10:28.360
<v Speaker 4>there on at the time where eight hundred million a UM,

0:10:28.520 --> 0:10:31.360
<v Speaker 4>I guess we have a team of twenty twenty five people,

0:10:31.640 --> 0:10:33.640
<v Speaker 4>most of them still being with us today, by the way.

0:10:34.080 --> 0:10:36.560
<v Speaker 4>And it's great when you've been to work together, if

0:10:36.600 --> 0:10:38.800
<v Speaker 4>you allow me, because then you know, you just have

0:10:38.920 --> 0:10:40.160
<v Speaker 4>to look at someone in the eyes and you know

0:10:40.240 --> 0:10:41.920
<v Speaker 4>exactly how they're going to be eight because we've been

0:10:41.920 --> 0:10:44.560
<v Speaker 4>through that, you know, together. And so for us, you know,

0:10:44.640 --> 0:10:47.719
<v Speaker 4>beyond the people and beyond the institution, it was the

0:10:47.760 --> 0:10:51.840
<v Speaker 4>beginning of a second phase of the journey. I like

0:10:51.880 --> 0:10:54.960
<v Speaker 4>to say, maybe not less naive about you know, how

0:10:55.000 --> 0:10:58.600
<v Speaker 4>easy all these things are, because they're not easy. Steve

0:10:58.600 --> 0:11:01.680
<v Speaker 4>Schwartzman wrote his book called What it Takes, you know,

0:11:02.120 --> 0:11:04.280
<v Speaker 4>And so for us, that was every single being equal,

0:11:04.520 --> 0:11:07.520
<v Speaker 4>the beginning of the second phase of the journey, where

0:11:07.559 --> 0:11:10.199
<v Speaker 4>it was no longer the teasing part. You were effectively

0:11:10.280 --> 0:11:13.439
<v Speaker 4>like into the real stuff. Now on the positive and

0:11:13.480 --> 0:11:16.240
<v Speaker 4>the civil lining was that this whole situation started you know,

0:11:16.360 --> 0:11:19.599
<v Speaker 4>putting a lot of light on let's say, the alternative

0:11:19.640 --> 0:11:23.760
<v Speaker 4>market private debt. Private credit was unheard of in Europe

0:11:23.960 --> 0:11:28.599
<v Speaker 4>until the banks effectively went into this massive liquidity squeeze

0:11:28.800 --> 0:11:31.840
<v Speaker 4>and all those asset managers had to you know, step

0:11:31.880 --> 0:11:33.360
<v Speaker 4>in and feel this void.

0:11:33.440 --> 0:11:34.800
<v Speaker 3>Great opportunity for US.

0:11:35.080 --> 0:11:37.719
<v Speaker 4>Private equity at the time was only about buyout an

0:11:37.920 --> 0:11:40.520
<v Speaker 4>LBO only if you had heard about, you know, the

0:11:40.559 --> 0:11:45.040
<v Speaker 4>growth equity part where you need to strengthen an entrepreneurial

0:11:45.040 --> 0:11:47.680
<v Speaker 4>companies in a balance sheet, because it's not you know,

0:11:47.920 --> 0:11:50.560
<v Speaker 4>she's not trying to sell the business. It's just about

0:11:50.600 --> 0:11:53.080
<v Speaker 4>you know, making sure you find the right partners, you know,

0:11:53.120 --> 0:11:55.280
<v Speaker 4>to strengthen the balance sheet, and so so and so.

0:11:55.760 --> 0:11:59.680
<v Speaker 4>You know, we started a new period. Adding on top

0:11:59.720 --> 0:12:03.280
<v Speaker 4>of that, you know this very accommuniting military policy. Well

0:12:03.320 --> 0:12:07.280
<v Speaker 4>that was the beginning of a new chapter for private

0:12:07.320 --> 0:12:10.720
<v Speaker 4>markets and we were lucky, you know, to effectively embark

0:12:10.760 --> 0:12:12.320
<v Speaker 4>on this journey at this time.

0:12:12.679 --> 0:12:13.600
<v Speaker 3>So let me.

0:12:13.760 --> 0:12:18.439
<v Speaker 2>Follow up on the financial crisis the period afterwards. Clearly

0:12:18.440 --> 0:12:22.360
<v Speaker 2>it was highly disruptive, lots of damage done, lots of

0:12:22.360 --> 0:12:25.640
<v Speaker 2>people lost their jobs, lots of businesses went out. But

0:12:25.760 --> 0:12:29.800
<v Speaker 2>it sounds like a lot of opportunities were created in

0:12:29.840 --> 0:12:30.600
<v Speaker 2>what came after.

0:12:31.559 --> 0:12:35.240
<v Speaker 4>It was certainly the case for us again, you know,

0:12:35.559 --> 0:12:40.000
<v Speaker 4>many challenges, but with the hard work and with people

0:12:40.280 --> 0:12:45.800
<v Speaker 4>who could see, you know, the opportunity, and publicly with

0:12:45.960 --> 0:12:53.360
<v Speaker 4>the European approach, thinking that, yes, you can develop a

0:12:53.480 --> 0:12:58.880
<v Speaker 4>very multi local footprint organization in Europe, be an alternative

0:12:58.960 --> 0:13:03.640
<v Speaker 4>to global investment tours to clients, to the to the

0:13:03.640 --> 0:13:06.080
<v Speaker 4>one established you know mainly you know, mainly Americans. You know,

0:13:06.080 --> 0:13:08.880
<v Speaker 4>I must admit that was very exciting, you know, it

0:13:08.960 --> 0:13:11.439
<v Speaker 4>was very exciting to get into that and to a

0:13:11.480 --> 0:13:15.400
<v Speaker 4>certain extent, you know, we had been looking forward for

0:13:15.440 --> 0:13:18.120
<v Speaker 4>the day where we could face another of those crises,

0:13:18.160 --> 0:13:20.680
<v Speaker 4>and we all know they're all different, but better prepared,

0:13:21.080 --> 0:13:23.920
<v Speaker 4>better prepared, you know, with more resources, with the more

0:13:23.960 --> 0:13:28.040
<v Speaker 4>powerful platform, with a bigger footprint and living you know,

0:13:28.240 --> 0:13:31.120
<v Speaker 4>COVID aside living you know, I don't know Brexit aside

0:13:31.360 --> 0:13:34.920
<v Speaker 4>leaving all these little steps. Over the past ten years,

0:13:34.960 --> 0:13:39.360
<v Speaker 4>twelve years, we've been you know, getting better prepared, you know,

0:13:39.400 --> 0:13:42.440
<v Speaker 4>for when the cycle changed and we may have entered

0:13:42.480 --> 0:13:44.800
<v Speaker 4>you know, this new this new chapter of this new

0:13:44.800 --> 0:13:48.240
<v Speaker 4>cycle raising interest rates started you know a year ago

0:13:48.720 --> 0:13:51.320
<v Speaker 4>where of the view that it's no, it's not getting

0:13:51.640 --> 0:13:54.160
<v Speaker 4>lower anytime soon, and so we go back to the

0:13:54.160 --> 0:13:57.439
<v Speaker 4>basics of what our job should be risk on the

0:13:57.480 --> 0:14:04.240
<v Speaker 4>writing risk assessment. Asset prices are different from asset valuation.

0:14:04.760 --> 0:14:09.599
<v Speaker 4>I mean the valuation in the future cash flow discounted

0:14:09.600 --> 0:14:12.240
<v Speaker 4>at the risk cre rate perscualisk premium. Well, guess what

0:14:12.400 --> 0:14:14.280
<v Speaker 4>the risk cree rate now is five percent is no

0:14:14.320 --> 0:14:16.840
<v Speaker 4>longer zero, and the risk premium is closer to five

0:14:16.840 --> 0:14:17.440
<v Speaker 4>percent than.

0:14:17.320 --> 0:14:18.000
<v Speaker 3>It is from two.

0:14:18.480 --> 0:14:20.280
<v Speaker 4>And so all of a sudden, the whole merits of

0:14:20.320 --> 0:14:24.280
<v Speaker 4>our job gets back into the center of the pitch,

0:14:24.720 --> 0:14:26.680
<v Speaker 4>and that makes our drop much more exciting. You know,

0:14:26.720 --> 0:14:29.320
<v Speaker 4>we've never been more excited that we've been for the

0:14:29.360 --> 0:14:30.840
<v Speaker 4>past twelve months to invest today.

0:14:31.120 --> 0:14:36.920
<v Speaker 2>So let's talk about what brought TKO to the US. Clearly,

0:14:37.000 --> 0:14:39.400
<v Speaker 2>you guys were very successful in Europe. You now have

0:14:39.480 --> 0:14:43.720
<v Speaker 2>thirteen offices around the world. Is it just the size

0:14:43.720 --> 0:14:44.680
<v Speaker 2>of the US market?

0:14:44.720 --> 0:14:45.960
<v Speaker 1>What was the attraction here?

0:14:46.480 --> 0:14:50.120
<v Speaker 4>Well, I mean size is definitely you know a reason,

0:14:50.240 --> 0:14:53.640
<v Speaker 4>But I would add we had just gone public at

0:14:53.680 --> 0:14:56.520
<v Speaker 4>the time, you know, twenty seventeen, and for us, the

0:14:56.600 --> 0:15:00.560
<v Speaker 4>leasting maybe way before it became more preyed you know,

0:15:00.600 --> 0:15:05.040
<v Speaker 4>in the recent years was the main objective of the

0:15:05.080 --> 0:15:08.720
<v Speaker 4>listing barrier was really to promote the brand, the franchise.

0:15:10.160 --> 0:15:12.240
<v Speaker 4>We never saw the single share on the occasion of this.

0:15:12.240 --> 0:15:14.280
<v Speaker 2>You guys only allowed a small piece to go.

0:15:14.320 --> 0:15:19.359
<v Speaker 4>Public, right, that's right, and all our historical backers, shareholders,

0:15:19.360 --> 0:15:22.440
<v Speaker 4>they actually you know, kept on supporting the business.

0:15:22.520 --> 0:15:22.760
<v Speaker 1>You know.

0:15:22.840 --> 0:15:25.560
<v Speaker 4>We tapped these here market twice and they all you know,

0:15:25.600 --> 0:15:31.520
<v Speaker 4>reinforced their ownership. So unlike many IPOs which are away,

0:15:31.560 --> 0:15:33.360
<v Speaker 4>you know, to monetize the business, for us, it was

0:15:33.400 --> 0:15:37.480
<v Speaker 4>about really about rationalizing the platform. We had just come

0:15:37.520 --> 0:15:41.520
<v Speaker 4>out of thirteen fourteen years of very entrepreneurial development during

0:15:41.520 --> 0:15:44.520
<v Speaker 4>a period as you mentioned, which was pretty bumpy, and

0:15:44.560 --> 0:15:47.040
<v Speaker 4>so it was a great way to rationalize the platform.

0:15:47.160 --> 0:15:50.880
<v Speaker 4>Come with one brand, one name, getting the name out there.

0:15:51.480 --> 0:15:53.960
<v Speaker 4>So that was in twenty seventeen when public on Neuron

0:15:54.000 --> 0:15:58.240
<v Speaker 4>next Paris and coming to the US. Was there was

0:15:58.320 --> 0:16:00.760
<v Speaker 4>no other alternity than coming to the US, you know,

0:16:00.880 --> 0:16:03.040
<v Speaker 4>at some point, and we thought the timing was right

0:16:03.560 --> 0:16:06.600
<v Speaker 4>both because we had now we are then you know,

0:16:06.680 --> 0:16:11.320
<v Speaker 4>twenty billion aum. We've been in in Asia for a

0:16:11.320 --> 0:16:14.080
<v Speaker 4>few years and it had been extremely promising and so

0:16:14.120 --> 0:16:15.800
<v Speaker 4>I decided, you know, to come here, you know, to

0:16:15.880 --> 0:16:19.600
<v Speaker 4>promote this brand, to convert into a commercial relationship, raising

0:16:19.640 --> 0:16:22.520
<v Speaker 4>more capital towards US investors, which to your point is

0:16:22.560 --> 0:16:25.560
<v Speaker 4>one of the deepest market in the world. And then

0:16:25.560 --> 0:16:28.080
<v Speaker 4>also you know, start deploying capital here in the US.

0:16:28.360 --> 0:16:30.120
<v Speaker 4>Not that there is a shortage of capital you know,

0:16:30.680 --> 0:16:33.280
<v Speaker 4>by no means, but as we like to say, you know,

0:16:33.360 --> 0:16:38.400
<v Speaker 4>create not compete. And so we started initially like secondary

0:16:38.400 --> 0:16:43.360
<v Speaker 4>private credit, you know, private debt was a mainstream developed

0:16:43.440 --> 0:16:46.200
<v Speaker 4>strategy here I mean globally and here in the US.

0:16:46.240 --> 0:16:47.920
<v Speaker 4>I think we're one of the first one to move

0:16:47.920 --> 0:16:51.480
<v Speaker 4>into secondary private credit. You know, fast forward a couple

0:16:51.480 --> 0:16:54.120
<v Speaker 4>of fields. Three years now we can demonstrate the merits

0:16:54.120 --> 0:16:56.760
<v Speaker 4>of the strategy, the track record of the strategy. We

0:16:56.840 --> 0:17:01.080
<v Speaker 4>started expanding into a mid market infrastructure. That was right

0:17:01.160 --> 0:17:04.159
<v Speaker 4>before the you know, the Biden election and all the

0:17:04.200 --> 0:17:08.040
<v Speaker 4>focusing on infrastructure, when we were not active in infrastructure

0:17:08.200 --> 0:17:11.040
<v Speaker 4>in Europe. So we try to find some play that

0:17:11.119 --> 0:17:14.080
<v Speaker 4>could differentiate ourselves. Not only is a v you know,

0:17:14.119 --> 0:17:16.760
<v Speaker 4>European and Asian investors, but also here in the US

0:17:17.040 --> 0:17:19.760
<v Speaker 4>to be able to tell a different story to LPs.

0:17:20.080 --> 0:17:22.439
<v Speaker 4>With one key differentiating factor is the skin in the

0:17:22.480 --> 0:17:24.760
<v Speaker 4>game that we have, you know, as a structure and

0:17:24.800 --> 0:17:26.320
<v Speaker 4>as founders into the organization.

0:17:26.680 --> 0:17:29.600
<v Speaker 2>So a lot of companies that go public then have

0:17:29.680 --> 0:17:33.119
<v Speaker 2>a valuable currency they can use for acquisitions. How did

0:17:33.160 --> 0:17:34.960
<v Speaker 2>that plag into the thinking.

0:17:35.080 --> 0:17:37.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that's right, and we you know, we use that

0:17:37.320 --> 0:17:40.960
<v Speaker 4>a couple of times very selectively since going up public

0:17:41.040 --> 0:17:43.000
<v Speaker 4>Infras you know, was one of them.

0:17:43.640 --> 0:17:45.040
<v Speaker 3>Another one in a.

0:17:45.040 --> 0:17:48.520
<v Speaker 4>Real estate you know, in Europe, and I mean they

0:17:48.560 --> 0:17:53.080
<v Speaker 4>were very selective bolt on acquisition, you know, an acquisition

0:17:53.200 --> 0:17:56.520
<v Speaker 4>in our businesses is always a big bet, right It's

0:17:56.880 --> 0:18:00.880
<v Speaker 4>we're in the people business, and you need the chemistry,

0:18:00.920 --> 0:18:03.400
<v Speaker 4>I mean, you need the culture you know, to work out.

0:18:04.800 --> 0:18:07.199
<v Speaker 4>But you know, looking forward, it's certainly we're in a

0:18:07.200 --> 0:18:10.479
<v Speaker 4>better position today to come to your acquisition than we

0:18:10.480 --> 0:18:12.320
<v Speaker 4>were in a few years ago. So as the market

0:18:12.680 --> 0:18:15.000
<v Speaker 4>and the industry restructure, you know, we will certainly be

0:18:15.840 --> 0:18:17.760
<v Speaker 4>very very opportunistic.

0:18:18.760 --> 0:18:21.400
<v Speaker 2>It's kind of interesting the thought of Bolton as opposed

0:18:21.440 --> 0:18:25.359
<v Speaker 2>to within the same space, there's a long history of

0:18:25.640 --> 0:18:28.719
<v Speaker 2>financial acquisitions that didn't really work out all that well

0:18:28.880 --> 0:18:31.880
<v Speaker 2>because of the chemistry as most of the cultural issues.

0:18:32.160 --> 0:18:35.119
<v Speaker 2>But something you said earlier really stood out to me.

0:18:35.760 --> 0:18:39.119
<v Speaker 2>You want to create, not compete. So let's talk a

0:18:39.160 --> 0:18:43.359
<v Speaker 2>little bit about how you guys at TKO think differently.

0:18:43.960 --> 0:18:47.760
<v Speaker 2>Tell us or a Steve Jobs term think different tell

0:18:47.840 --> 0:18:51.360
<v Speaker 2>us how you approach the world differently than a lot

0:18:51.400 --> 0:18:52.320
<v Speaker 2>of your competitors.

0:18:54.600 --> 0:18:56.560
<v Speaker 4>You know, when we studied, as they told you, extremely

0:18:57.400 --> 0:19:00.119
<v Speaker 4>extremely modest, there were plenty of franchise out there. And

0:19:00.200 --> 0:19:03.200
<v Speaker 4>you know, even if you talk to private investors, high

0:19:03.240 --> 0:19:05.840
<v Speaker 4>networth family offices can be a bit more nimble in

0:19:05.840 --> 0:19:07.600
<v Speaker 4>the way. You know, they approach their asset a location.

0:19:08.119 --> 0:19:10.840
<v Speaker 4>They need to see a reason why they would go,

0:19:10.920 --> 0:19:13.480
<v Speaker 4>you know, with what was back then a tk who

0:19:13.800 --> 0:19:17.000
<v Speaker 4>more than a TKO, you know, and find you know,

0:19:17.080 --> 0:19:19.160
<v Speaker 4>and and find a reason why you know, they would

0:19:19.160 --> 0:19:21.840
<v Speaker 4>allocate there back then. You know, in Europe back in

0:19:21.880 --> 0:19:24.200
<v Speaker 4>the day when we start doing you know, private credit

0:19:24.320 --> 0:19:26.879
<v Speaker 4>direct lending today is very much mainstream. I can tell

0:19:26.920 --> 0:19:30.359
<v Speaker 4>you that that that back then it was not you know,

0:19:30.400 --> 0:19:32.399
<v Speaker 4>at the time, they even called it shadow banking. You know,

0:19:32.440 --> 0:19:34.040
<v Speaker 4>in Europe it's been quite a wild since you know,

0:19:34.040 --> 0:19:36.000
<v Speaker 4>I last read about shadow banking be so it's become

0:19:36.080 --> 0:19:39.600
<v Speaker 4>so mainstream and structural. You know today that it's really

0:19:39.640 --> 0:19:42.280
<v Speaker 4>part of the year. So we've always tried to effectively

0:19:42.359 --> 0:19:46.560
<v Speaker 4>be a little bit I don't know how it comes across,

0:19:46.560 --> 0:19:49.040
<v Speaker 4>and it's not the underdog, but you know, coming with

0:19:49.119 --> 0:19:51.440
<v Speaker 4>something that is different so that you can slay. Yeah,

0:19:51.560 --> 0:19:54.400
<v Speaker 4>so that you can make you know, a name for yourself,

0:19:54.720 --> 0:19:58.120
<v Speaker 4>and then you know, use these adjacencies at the business

0:19:58.560 --> 0:20:01.440
<v Speaker 4>then to scale and make them very mainstream. I was

0:20:01.480 --> 0:20:04.080
<v Speaker 4>saying the secondary private credit that we launched a couple

0:20:04.080 --> 0:20:07.679
<v Speaker 4>of years ago. Now here in New York, it's becoming

0:20:07.680 --> 0:20:09.320
<v Speaker 4>a bit more mainstream. Every day I would see one

0:20:09.359 --> 0:20:11.680
<v Speaker 4>of the large Belch bracket banks, you know, launching or

0:20:11.720 --> 0:20:13.680
<v Speaker 4>speaking about the INSUAD. But like, well, maybe that was

0:20:13.680 --> 0:20:16.119
<v Speaker 4>a good idea we had, and competition is good, by

0:20:16.160 --> 0:20:18.960
<v Speaker 4>the way, you know, nothing wrong about competition, but at

0:20:19.040 --> 0:20:21.760
<v Speaker 4>least you've established, you know, a name for yourself and

0:20:21.760 --> 0:20:23.520
<v Speaker 4>obviously got the track record and you can, you know,

0:20:23.560 --> 0:20:27.080
<v Speaker 4>you can showcase that. So that's step one. The second thing,

0:20:28.400 --> 0:20:30.920
<v Speaker 4>bar if I may, is you know, in our industry,

0:20:31.280 --> 0:20:34.280
<v Speaker 4>what should make the biggest difference is the skin in

0:20:34.320 --> 0:20:37.240
<v Speaker 4>the game that the managers you know, put into their business.

0:20:38.680 --> 0:20:41.919
<v Speaker 4>I like to say that in our industry, you come

0:20:41.960 --> 0:20:44.240
<v Speaker 4>across a lot of people who are willing to make

0:20:44.280 --> 0:20:48.000
<v Speaker 4>money with someone else money. You came across less people

0:20:48.080 --> 0:20:52.720
<v Speaker 4>willing to make some money with the kids money. Any entrepreneur,

0:20:53.040 --> 0:20:57.120
<v Speaker 4>you know is you know, is taking risks by you know,

0:20:57.280 --> 0:20:59.520
<v Speaker 4>borrowing some capital and investing into his.

0:20:59.520 --> 0:21:01.040
<v Speaker 3>Business, whatever the business is.

0:21:02.080 --> 0:21:05.480
<v Speaker 4>And in our industry at times, I think that there's

0:21:05.480 --> 0:21:06.760
<v Speaker 4>been a little bit of.

0:21:08.359 --> 0:21:09.760
<v Speaker 3>Irony, not to.

0:21:09.680 --> 0:21:13.760
<v Speaker 4>Say hypocrisy in the way that we showcase the skin

0:21:13.800 --> 0:21:16.439
<v Speaker 4>in the game. I don't think carried interest is a

0:21:16.440 --> 0:21:19.920
<v Speaker 4>great alignment of interest. The only alignment of interest in

0:21:19.960 --> 0:21:23.080
<v Speaker 4>the amount of capital that any given manager firm is

0:21:23.160 --> 0:21:27.920
<v Speaker 4>putting into its fund. You when you read that, okay, well,

0:21:27.960 --> 0:21:30.320
<v Speaker 4>you know we put you know, one percent of the fund,

0:21:30.359 --> 0:21:32.960
<v Speaker 4>you know, as commitment from the GP. The fund is

0:21:33.000 --> 0:21:35.000
<v Speaker 4>a billion, you know, we put ten million. It's a

0:21:35.040 --> 0:21:37.840
<v Speaker 4>lot of money, yes, but you're charging two percent for

0:21:37.880 --> 0:21:39.680
<v Speaker 4>the next ten years, so the option cost is not

0:21:39.760 --> 0:21:40.920
<v Speaker 4>that high.

0:21:41.240 --> 0:21:42.520
<v Speaker 3>When you're putting.

0:21:42.359 --> 0:21:45.640
<v Speaker 4>Ten percent twenty percent of your balance sheet capital side

0:21:45.640 --> 0:21:48.560
<v Speaker 4>by side with your LP. You can do a basic

0:21:48.720 --> 0:21:51.120
<v Speaker 4>Excel spreadsheet and you'll see, you know, what is at

0:21:51.119 --> 0:21:54.119
<v Speaker 4>stake and that effectively, yes, you're going to make some

0:21:54.160 --> 0:21:56.520
<v Speaker 4>money on the management fees on the performance field of

0:21:56.520 --> 0:21:59.120
<v Speaker 4>the carried interest, but you know what you have at

0:21:59.119 --> 0:22:02.439
<v Speaker 4>stake side by side with your client is a totally

0:22:02.440 --> 0:22:05.560
<v Speaker 4>different magnitude. And I think this is where the industry

0:22:05.560 --> 0:22:09.800
<v Speaker 4>should be heading. And many or for you know, peers, competitors,

0:22:09.800 --> 0:22:13.560
<v Speaker 4>they all have different models, but the one with significant

0:22:13.600 --> 0:22:16.720
<v Speaker 4>skin in the game from the GP, from the partners,

0:22:16.760 --> 0:22:19.200
<v Speaker 4>from the balance sheet and going public by the way,

0:22:19.440 --> 0:22:21.760
<v Speaker 4>bar it was a great way for us to strengthen

0:22:22.080 --> 0:22:25.399
<v Speaker 4>this equity base, which is you know, partner zone and

0:22:25.480 --> 0:22:30.240
<v Speaker 4>control and management own to effectively create what has been

0:22:30.280 --> 0:22:32.760
<v Speaker 4>so far, certainly in Europe, a second to none skin

0:22:32.840 --> 0:22:34.320
<v Speaker 4>in the game model.

0:22:34.640 --> 0:22:36.440
<v Speaker 2>I like the way that sounds. Let's talk a little

0:22:36.440 --> 0:22:39.520
<v Speaker 2>bit about Europe. If we look at the past few decades,

0:22:40.080 --> 0:22:42.920
<v Speaker 2>Europe out performed the US and the two thousands. While

0:22:42.920 --> 0:22:46.639
<v Speaker 2>we were going through dot com and financial crisis in

0:22:46.680 --> 0:22:50.720
<v Speaker 2>the twenty tens, the US markets were just on fire

0:22:50.840 --> 0:22:54.200
<v Speaker 2>and really did very well. Twenty twenties things started out

0:22:54.240 --> 0:22:55.600
<v Speaker 2>a little shaky.

0:22:55.800 --> 0:22:56.760
<v Speaker 1>How do you.

0:22:56.600 --> 0:23:01.520
<v Speaker 2>Compare the investment environment in Europe over the past few

0:23:01.560 --> 0:23:03.680
<v Speaker 2>decades versus the US.

0:23:04.600 --> 0:23:08.119
<v Speaker 4>Well, both of them were obviously driven by interest rates,

0:23:08.119 --> 0:23:10.919
<v Speaker 4>and they moved you know, the same direction, but in

0:23:11.040 --> 0:23:14.960
<v Speaker 4>different patterns. And when we first got into negative interest

0:23:15.040 --> 0:23:17.560
<v Speaker 4>rates in Europe a few years ago on the back

0:23:17.600 --> 0:23:20.240
<v Speaker 4>of the euro crisis, you know, and post the GFC

0:23:20.800 --> 0:23:22.879
<v Speaker 4>first with the sovereigns, but then you know, with the

0:23:22.920 --> 0:23:26.200
<v Speaker 4>IG market, with the investment grade market, you had corporates

0:23:26.200 --> 0:23:29.840
<v Speaker 4>basically borrowing you know, one hundred and being asked, you know,

0:23:29.920 --> 0:23:32.960
<v Speaker 4>to give back ninety eight. And today, you know, when

0:23:33.000 --> 0:23:35.879
<v Speaker 4>you look backwards and with no back trading, you're like,

0:23:35.960 --> 0:23:39.480
<v Speaker 4>you know, okay, what you know, what were we thinking about,

0:23:39.520 --> 0:23:42.320
<v Speaker 4>you know, back then, because for what we do, and

0:23:42.640 --> 0:23:46.040
<v Speaker 4>I mean, you know, the business Barry like risk underwriting

0:23:46.359 --> 0:23:50.280
<v Speaker 4>is about effectively scaling the risk, you know, the return,

0:23:50.560 --> 0:23:55.439
<v Speaker 4>and we were in a very awkward environment. And so

0:23:55.480 --> 0:24:00.040
<v Speaker 4>that's why I was surprised to see so many people surprised.

0:24:00.240 --> 0:24:03.159
<v Speaker 4>You know, a year ago May twenty two, you know,

0:24:03.280 --> 0:24:05.720
<v Speaker 4>interest rates started rising and all of a sudden, the

0:24:05.760 --> 0:24:11.399
<v Speaker 4>whole software were bugged. I mean, what we do is

0:24:11.440 --> 0:24:13.960
<v Speaker 4>not rocket science, and it all come down to the

0:24:15.400 --> 0:24:19.520
<v Speaker 4>value of liquidity and the cost of credit. And then

0:24:19.560 --> 0:24:22.080
<v Speaker 4>we can start, you know, doing what we are supposed

0:24:22.080 --> 0:24:23.840
<v Speaker 4>to be doing. You know risk and the writing, and

0:24:23.920 --> 0:24:26.960
<v Speaker 4>so Europe US went into different patterns on the way

0:24:27.000 --> 0:24:29.199
<v Speaker 4>down and very different on the way up. I mean

0:24:29.240 --> 0:24:33.640
<v Speaker 4>here in the US, obviously you were much more reactive,

0:24:33.720 --> 0:24:37.400
<v Speaker 4>you know, in raising rates. Rightly, so in my view,

0:24:38.119 --> 0:24:40.760
<v Speaker 4>maybe Europe is lagging a bit that time around. You know,

0:24:41.320 --> 0:24:45.800
<v Speaker 4>they were actually faster at reducing interest rates even so

0:24:45.880 --> 0:24:51.040
<v Speaker 4>into negative territory. But there is a little bit of

0:24:51.119 --> 0:24:53.480
<v Speaker 4>the coupling you know, going on right now, and for

0:24:53.560 --> 0:24:55.359
<v Speaker 4>us it's a great way partly, you know, a tico

0:24:55.480 --> 0:24:59.000
<v Speaker 4>where we are, you know, we are very exposed to

0:24:59.040 --> 0:25:03.280
<v Speaker 4>the yield play credit in FRA real estate, be spoke

0:25:03.320 --> 0:25:07.040
<v Speaker 4>credit and so all that's are the starting point of

0:25:07.040 --> 0:25:08.480
<v Speaker 4>this risk underwriting.

0:25:08.760 --> 0:25:11.080
<v Speaker 2>So let's talk a little bit about the difference between

0:25:11.080 --> 0:25:14.880
<v Speaker 2>the twenty tens and the twenty twenties. Starting with Hey,

0:25:14.920 --> 0:25:17.879
<v Speaker 2>it's pretty arguable that by the time the FED began

0:25:18.040 --> 0:25:21.200
<v Speaker 2>raising rates here in the United States, they were already

0:25:21.200 --> 0:25:24.360
<v Speaker 2>behind the curve. Their two percent target had been hit

0:25:24.359 --> 0:25:28.280
<v Speaker 2>a year earlier, and CPI kept going higher. So if

0:25:28.320 --> 0:25:32.119
<v Speaker 2>the FED was behind the curve, how much further behind

0:25:32.160 --> 0:25:34.840
<v Speaker 2>the curve of the central banks in Europe in terms

0:25:34.880 --> 0:25:36.600
<v Speaker 2>of dealing with their inflation issues.

0:25:37.359 --> 0:25:41.679
<v Speaker 4>The you know, central banks in the US and in

0:25:41.720 --> 0:25:44.439
<v Speaker 4>Europe they may have a different mandate, you know, one

0:25:44.520 --> 0:25:46.800
<v Speaker 4>might be more political, you know than the others. And

0:25:46.840 --> 0:25:48.720
<v Speaker 4>at times, you know, when you have to effectively finance

0:25:48.760 --> 0:25:51.760
<v Speaker 4>you know, all the deficiats, you know, you have to

0:25:51.800 --> 0:25:54.760
<v Speaker 4>be mindful that you need to be able, you know,

0:25:54.800 --> 0:25:57.040
<v Speaker 4>to issue, you know, to issue and you pay down

0:25:57.080 --> 0:26:02.000
<v Speaker 4>this debt. I think that you know, right now, and

0:26:02.040 --> 0:26:05.919
<v Speaker 4>without getting into too many political details, I mean, Europe

0:26:06.080 --> 0:26:09.040
<v Speaker 4>is probably is not in a good place relative to

0:26:09.080 --> 0:26:13.560
<v Speaker 4>where they were in reacting to COVID for example, or

0:26:13.600 --> 0:26:18.400
<v Speaker 4>reacting to the euro crisis you know, ten years ago.

0:26:18.440 --> 0:26:23.359
<v Speaker 4>I mean, the political situation in Europe has created indirectly

0:26:23.480 --> 0:26:27.120
<v Speaker 4>some effect maybe on the on the ECB and as

0:26:27.200 --> 0:26:29.960
<v Speaker 4>much you know, I mean, Christian Legards has been doing

0:26:29.960 --> 0:26:34.280
<v Speaker 4>a terrific job after a Mario drug you know there.

0:26:34.720 --> 0:26:36.920
<v Speaker 3>But the institution you know.

0:26:36.960 --> 0:26:40.760
<v Speaker 4>Maybe should be a bit a boulder, you know, in

0:26:40.840 --> 0:26:44.280
<v Speaker 4>the way you're tackling this, this inflation issue, because we

0:26:44.320 --> 0:26:48.840
<v Speaker 4>all know that period of very low interest rates create

0:26:48.920 --> 0:26:53.879
<v Speaker 4>massive inequality, inequality you know, between people having access to

0:26:53.960 --> 0:26:56.000
<v Speaker 4>credit and the people who don't have access to credit,

0:26:56.080 --> 0:26:59.919
<v Speaker 4>and as in people, it's individual, it's corporate, its states,

0:27:00.520 --> 0:27:03.440
<v Speaker 4>and so ironically, you know, you save a system, but

0:27:03.560 --> 0:27:06.200
<v Speaker 4>you make it to be more inequal in the way

0:27:06.280 --> 0:27:08.240
<v Speaker 4>people came out of this period.

0:27:08.760 --> 0:27:12.440
<v Speaker 2>So that's really interesting. During the post financial crisis era

0:27:12.600 --> 0:27:18.280
<v Speaker 2>of very low rates, anything priced in credit, real estate equities,

0:27:18.400 --> 0:27:21.960
<v Speaker 2>bonds did really well. Certainly that helps the top ten

0:27:22.000 --> 0:27:26.199
<v Speaker 2>percent in the United States. During COVID, rather than just

0:27:26.240 --> 0:27:31.040
<v Speaker 2>a monetary response, we saw a massive fiscal response which

0:27:31.080 --> 0:27:35.320
<v Speaker 2>seemed to have really helped across the entire economic strata,

0:27:35.400 --> 0:27:40.200
<v Speaker 2>especially the middle class. So what do our experiences post

0:27:40.200 --> 0:27:44.080
<v Speaker 2>financial crisis, post COVID tell us about the need for

0:27:44.160 --> 0:27:47.360
<v Speaker 2>balance between monetary and fiscal stimulus.

0:27:47.600 --> 0:27:50.359
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, you're absolutely right. But by the same token, we

0:27:50.480 --> 0:27:54.280
<v Speaker 4>know that right now. I'm not an economist, but you know,

0:27:54.400 --> 0:27:56.720
<v Speaker 4>in the US, in Europe, you know, the inflation, the

0:27:56.760 --> 0:27:59.720
<v Speaker 4>structural inflation, people might have a different view about that

0:28:00.480 --> 0:28:05.080
<v Speaker 4>is certainly hurting, you know, the one with the less

0:28:05.080 --> 0:28:13.000
<v Speaker 4>you know resources, you know obviously food, energy, housing, and

0:28:13.119 --> 0:28:17.320
<v Speaker 4>not even talking about you know, school, healthcare. And obviously

0:28:17.480 --> 0:28:20.080
<v Speaker 4>in Europe we have a totally different different you know,

0:28:20.240 --> 0:28:26.399
<v Speaker 4>environment and about this this matter. So's it's a tricky situation.

0:28:26.520 --> 0:28:29.200
<v Speaker 4>And where I think, as SAT managers have a role

0:28:29.280 --> 0:28:32.639
<v Speaker 4>to play is in making sure that whenever someone is

0:28:33.080 --> 0:28:37.840
<v Speaker 4>saving a dollar or investing a billion dollar, you know,

0:28:37.960 --> 0:28:42.040
<v Speaker 4>be a private investor or large insitual investors, is that

0:28:42.120 --> 0:28:46.560
<v Speaker 4>there is the appropriate risk return associated with the strategy

0:28:46.600 --> 0:28:49.680
<v Speaker 4>that is being implemented. That was very complicated to do

0:28:49.880 --> 0:28:54.120
<v Speaker 4>in the zero interest rates environment because everyone through the

0:28:54.200 --> 0:28:56.600
<v Speaker 4>dices and it was a double six because you can

0:28:56.680 --> 0:29:00.160
<v Speaker 4>only make it right when money is free. Because when

0:29:00.160 --> 0:29:02.880
<v Speaker 4>money is free, investment has no merits, you know. And

0:29:03.480 --> 0:29:05.840
<v Speaker 4>now that we are in a situation where money are

0:29:05.880 --> 0:29:09.360
<v Speaker 4>some value, then you can be discriminating and that should

0:29:09.400 --> 0:29:13.560
<v Speaker 4>benefit again the one individual saving a dollar or the

0:29:13.560 --> 0:29:18.840
<v Speaker 4>one institutional investing a billion, and that in that respect,

0:29:19.040 --> 0:29:22.280
<v Speaker 4>regardless of this macro situation.

0:29:22.520 --> 0:29:23.440
<v Speaker 3>If I can come.

0:29:23.320 --> 0:29:26.080
<v Speaker 4>Back to our role, as I said, managers, that's where

0:29:26.120 --> 0:29:26.920
<v Speaker 4>we have a role to play.

0:29:27.200 --> 0:29:30.160
<v Speaker 2>So let's talk a little bit about valuations relative to

0:29:30.400 --> 0:29:35.400
<v Speaker 2>risk and reward. Arguably, the United States, both the public

0:29:35.480 --> 0:29:39.080
<v Speaker 2>markets and the private markets are not cheap today. They're

0:29:39.120 --> 0:29:42.960
<v Speaker 2>not crazy dot com expensive, but they're certainly not inexpensive.

0:29:43.480 --> 0:29:46.240
<v Speaker 2>How does Europe and the rest of the world compare

0:29:46.280 --> 0:29:48.959
<v Speaker 2>on evaluation basis to the US.

0:29:50.800 --> 0:29:54.000
<v Speaker 4>Maybe because I come from a leverage finance backgrounds, As

0:29:54.040 --> 0:29:58.160
<v Speaker 4>I told you, I tend always to focus on the downside.

0:29:58.360 --> 0:30:02.840
<v Speaker 4>But I also learned along the way that you rarely

0:30:03.280 --> 0:30:07.520
<v Speaker 4>die I mean as a company from your from your

0:30:07.600 --> 0:30:09.920
<v Speaker 4>P and L or from your assets, but you always

0:30:09.920 --> 0:30:14.360
<v Speaker 4>die from your liabilities. And I think that effectively, this

0:30:15.360 --> 0:30:20.280
<v Speaker 4>excess in very cheap money, this success in leverage, this

0:30:20.480 --> 0:30:26.800
<v Speaker 4>success in thinking that you could access unlimited for an

0:30:26.800 --> 0:30:31.080
<v Speaker 4>indefinite period of time of cheap to free capital, may

0:30:31.120 --> 0:30:37.760
<v Speaker 4>have created some the wrong asset allocation pattern in some places.

0:30:38.120 --> 0:30:41.760
<v Speaker 4>So I think we've now entered a period where we

0:30:41.920 --> 0:30:49.680
<v Speaker 4>have to swallow this whole mispriced over leveled assets out there.

0:30:50.400 --> 0:30:53.880
<v Speaker 4>Corporate create was one obviously the bonds, I mean the

0:30:53.920 --> 0:30:56.520
<v Speaker 4>sovereign bond market, and we remember the SVB story.

0:30:56.520 --> 0:30:57.720
<v Speaker 3>It's about you know, t.

0:30:57.840 --> 0:31:02.440
<v Speaker 4>Builds, and then you obviously the real estate. You know,

0:31:02.720 --> 0:31:06.720
<v Speaker 4>many areas that were over leveled at the wrong cost,

0:31:06.760 --> 0:31:10.200
<v Speaker 4>and that could be painful because someone will have to

0:31:10.240 --> 0:31:13.240
<v Speaker 4>take the pain, even if you know, unlike two thousand

0:31:13.320 --> 0:31:15.720
<v Speaker 4>and eight, where the risk was concentrated, you know on

0:31:15.840 --> 0:31:20.120
<v Speaker 4>banks boundary today is much more spread across let's say,

0:31:20.120 --> 0:31:23.320
<v Speaker 4>you know, asset managers, but you have to find a

0:31:23.320 --> 0:31:27.000
<v Speaker 4>way to dry up all this excess of liquidity which

0:31:27.120 --> 0:31:31.920
<v Speaker 4>was necessary on the one hand, but maybe mispriced on

0:31:31.960 --> 0:31:36.760
<v Speaker 4>the other hand. And so today I think that part

0:31:36.800 --> 0:31:42.440
<v Speaker 4>of the IG fixed rate corporate bond market obviously you know,

0:31:42.560 --> 0:31:46.440
<v Speaker 4>part of the real estate and you know, we've been

0:31:46.480 --> 0:31:52.080
<v Speaker 4>talking at length about that we'll have to to suffer

0:31:52.240 --> 0:31:55.480
<v Speaker 4>some of the pain or lossits in some where, shape

0:31:55.560 --> 0:31:57.800
<v Speaker 4>or form. As always on the other side of this

0:31:57.880 --> 0:32:03.160
<v Speaker 4>trade that we'll create, you know, great opportunities for people liquid, nimble,

0:32:03.320 --> 0:32:07.240
<v Speaker 4>who don't have to carry age, you know, in ventories.

0:32:07.240 --> 0:32:11.000
<v Speaker 4>You know, if I, if I may say, I have

0:32:11.040 --> 0:32:13.600
<v Speaker 4>the impression that the US will.

0:32:13.520 --> 0:32:16.240
<v Speaker 3>Be more.

0:32:17.640 --> 0:32:19.680
<v Speaker 4>Realistic in the way they approach that, you know, in

0:32:19.800 --> 0:32:21.840
<v Speaker 4>terms of you know, taking the heat, taking the pain

0:32:22.000 --> 0:32:26.360
<v Speaker 4>starting again in Europe, maybe there's a little bit of

0:32:27.040 --> 0:32:31.160
<v Speaker 4>preten and extent game, but it's always better, you know,

0:32:31.240 --> 0:32:35.400
<v Speaker 4>to you know, what has to be done ultimately, you know,

0:32:35.440 --> 0:32:37.080
<v Speaker 4>should be done immediately.

0:32:36.720 --> 0:32:38.040
<v Speaker 1>As they had a band aid off.

0:32:39.480 --> 0:32:41.800
<v Speaker 4>Exactly, and that's what we should do when it comes

0:32:41.840 --> 0:32:43.880
<v Speaker 4>to financial risk and financial pricing.

0:32:44.120 --> 0:32:48.880
<v Speaker 2>So you mentioned the access liquidly is causing accesses and

0:32:49.240 --> 0:32:54.440
<v Speaker 2>the locations have higher fed rates and other around the

0:32:54.480 --> 0:32:57.320
<v Speaker 2>world higher interest rates, taking some of that out of

0:32:57.360 --> 0:33:02.040
<v Speaker 2>the system and combined, what is the impact of the

0:33:02.120 --> 0:33:05.040
<v Speaker 2>regional banks that have gone value up? A handful of them,

0:33:05.320 --> 0:33:08.280
<v Speaker 2>but it certainly has put the fear of God into

0:33:08.320 --> 0:33:11.120
<v Speaker 2>a lot of small banking shops. What does that do

0:33:11.640 --> 0:33:13.880
<v Speaker 2>to all the access liquidity that's out there.

0:33:14.480 --> 0:33:16.960
<v Speaker 4>You know, on the regional bank rather not common. I'm

0:33:17.000 --> 0:33:19.000
<v Speaker 4>not an expert, and it came in as if you

0:33:19.040 --> 0:33:23.280
<v Speaker 4>has a surprise how quickly large, very large institution you know,

0:33:23.400 --> 0:33:28.480
<v Speaker 4>could get into some liquidity liquidity stress. Coming back to

0:33:28.520 --> 0:33:32.360
<v Speaker 4>my comment again, you know it's your liability side, and

0:33:32.400 --> 0:33:35.440
<v Speaker 4>there's been a plenty of comment there. What I see

0:33:35.760 --> 0:33:39.000
<v Speaker 4>is that once again for asset managers, it's a very

0:33:39.000 --> 0:33:42.560
<v Speaker 4>interesting structural opportunity because it creates a bit of void,

0:33:42.640 --> 0:33:45.520
<v Speaker 4>you know, in terms of the market that we can

0:33:45.560 --> 0:33:49.120
<v Speaker 4>fill in in some way, shape or form. So I

0:33:49.160 --> 0:33:54.840
<v Speaker 4>think that on the positive side, investors allocators today they

0:33:54.840 --> 0:34:00.480
<v Speaker 4>can effectively allocate capital into strategies which will create a

0:34:00.560 --> 0:34:06.000
<v Speaker 4>compounding effect to their portfolio because what was I don't know,

0:34:06.040 --> 0:34:10.200
<v Speaker 4>three four percent in some strategies two years ago now

0:34:10.280 --> 0:34:13.200
<v Speaker 4>can be eight to ten. And so when you start,

0:34:13.239 --> 0:34:17.320
<v Speaker 4>you know, compounding your new allocation into these type of

0:34:17.360 --> 0:34:19.920
<v Speaker 4>strategies that can make up for the part of your

0:34:19.920 --> 0:34:22.279
<v Speaker 4>portfolio which itself you know, could be a little bit

0:34:22.400 --> 0:34:25.600
<v Speaker 4>underwater as a consequence of those rising interest rates you

0:34:25.600 --> 0:34:27.440
<v Speaker 4>know again, credit, you know, real estate.

0:34:27.239 --> 0:34:27.640
<v Speaker 1>What have you.

0:34:28.239 --> 0:34:31.279
<v Speaker 4>So that's the positive. You have to be able to

0:34:31.760 --> 0:34:33.920
<v Speaker 4>do that, right, So how do you do that? I mean,

0:34:33.920 --> 0:34:36.480
<v Speaker 4>if you have effectively the denominator's effect that people have

0:34:36.520 --> 0:34:39.560
<v Speaker 4>been you know talking about, or you know, more liquidity

0:34:39.600 --> 0:34:42.880
<v Speaker 4>constraint because cash is not coming back as quickly as

0:34:42.920 --> 0:34:46.000
<v Speaker 4>you had anticipated, because your managers cannot sell their portfolio.

0:34:46.080 --> 0:34:48.160
<v Speaker 3>Something the secondary market.

0:34:48.040 --> 0:34:50.759
<v Speaker 4>Has been developing like crazy on the private equity for example,

0:34:50.960 --> 0:34:53.040
<v Speaker 4>as I said, private credit, you know, is another one.

0:34:53.080 --> 0:34:56.120
<v Speaker 4>Real estate will be an obvious one, you know, given

0:34:56.160 --> 0:34:59.200
<v Speaker 4>the amount of capital out there. And so it's about

0:34:59.200 --> 0:35:01.200
<v Speaker 4>being prepared to say, Okay, I've been making you know,

0:35:01.640 --> 0:35:05.399
<v Speaker 4>five six seven percent on this strategy, maybe I will

0:35:05.440 --> 0:35:08.680
<v Speaker 4>you know, exit the strategy, albeit at a discount, you know,

0:35:08.760 --> 0:35:12.640
<v Speaker 4>the lowest possible, but the proceeds will be able to

0:35:12.680 --> 0:35:16.560
<v Speaker 4>be gener reinvested into strategy that will generate a higher

0:35:16.600 --> 0:35:19.839
<v Speaker 4>return which over a short medium time frame, can make

0:35:19.960 --> 0:35:22.719
<v Speaker 4>up you know, for this cash flow requirement that I

0:35:22.760 --> 0:35:24.880
<v Speaker 4>need for my pensioneers or you know what I have.

0:35:25.000 --> 0:35:30.240
<v Speaker 4>You So, I'm actually very optimistic that all asset owners,

0:35:30.480 --> 0:35:33.040
<v Speaker 4>asset locators, the one can be nimble.

0:35:33.440 --> 0:35:35.040
<v Speaker 3>You know. It's a very exciting time I heard.

0:35:35.600 --> 0:35:42.240
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk a little bit about how TKO champions impact investing. Obviously,

0:35:42.280 --> 0:35:45.160
<v Speaker 2>the goal is to get to some sort of sustainable future.

0:35:45.760 --> 0:35:47.279
<v Speaker 2>What your investment these is there?

0:35:47.560 --> 0:35:51.440
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think we were relatively early in what has

0:35:51.520 --> 0:35:55.040
<v Speaker 4>become a very mainstream strategy, you know, right rightly so,

0:35:56.480 --> 0:36:00.319
<v Speaker 4>and that was really you know, a combination of many factors.

0:36:00.719 --> 0:36:05.120
<v Speaker 4>We launched our very first growth equity growth private equity

0:36:05.880 --> 0:36:10.279
<v Speaker 4>strategy in twenty seventeen, twenty eighteen, way before you know

0:36:10.320 --> 0:36:12.120
<v Speaker 4>it has as I said, you know, become you know,

0:36:12.320 --> 0:36:17.160
<v Speaker 4>a must have strategy for many managers and for many allocators.

0:36:18.120 --> 0:36:21.239
<v Speaker 4>We started doing that because in Europe we've been investing

0:36:21.320 --> 0:36:25.799
<v Speaker 4>alongside entrepreneurs, families. As I said, well, not the buyout shop.

0:36:25.880 --> 0:36:27.680
<v Speaker 4>You know, we don't take control, you know, we don't

0:36:27.719 --> 0:36:30.239
<v Speaker 4>level up company. We're trying to, you know, in our

0:36:30.320 --> 0:36:33.040
<v Speaker 4>role of the middleman between the asset owners you know,

0:36:33.120 --> 0:36:37.320
<v Speaker 4>and the companies to allocate where we see the financial play,

0:36:37.360 --> 0:36:41.279
<v Speaker 4>but an impactful financial play. So when we started the

0:36:41.360 --> 0:36:47.680
<v Speaker 4>strategy in seventeen eighteen and started allocating capital investing in

0:36:47.880 --> 0:36:51.200
<v Speaker 4>entrepreneurs who had a solution that had to be massify

0:36:51.719 --> 0:36:54.640
<v Speaker 4>because when you want to meet this target and these goals,

0:36:54.680 --> 0:36:58.399
<v Speaker 4>you know, in terms of a climate of CEO two,

0:36:58.400 --> 0:37:01.440
<v Speaker 4>you know, reduction, it's great to be investing in what

0:37:01.600 --> 0:37:05.239
<v Speaker 4>will change in twenty by twenty fifty, but it's more

0:37:05.280 --> 0:37:09.080
<v Speaker 4>important to find what works today and needs to be massified,

0:37:10.320 --> 0:37:13.520
<v Speaker 4>scale up. You know, we're investing in profitable mid market

0:37:13.560 --> 0:37:16.759
<v Speaker 4>companies making twenty twenty five to fifty million.

0:37:16.480 --> 0:37:18.200
<v Speaker 1>A BDA and needed capital in.

0:37:18.760 --> 0:37:21.239
<v Speaker 4>Those guys are not looking to sell the company, they

0:37:21.280 --> 0:37:24.600
<v Speaker 4>need the capital in to scale. And we started doing

0:37:24.640 --> 0:37:29.600
<v Speaker 4>that across lo carbon mobility, across energy efficiencies of the

0:37:29.640 --> 0:37:31.560
<v Speaker 4>buildings as you know, you know it's forty percent of

0:37:31.560 --> 0:37:34.920
<v Speaker 4>the green gas emission, and so we started doing that.

0:37:35.280 --> 0:37:35.960
<v Speaker 3>I would say, you know.

0:37:36.000 --> 0:37:40.040
<v Speaker 4>Naturally five years later, we now can you represent effectively

0:37:40.080 --> 0:37:43.240
<v Speaker 4>the case studies? You know, obviously the truck record it matters,

0:37:43.280 --> 0:37:46.640
<v Speaker 4>but people want to understand what we're talking about when

0:37:46.640 --> 0:37:49.600
<v Speaker 4>we're talking about this type of fum impact investing here,

0:37:49.640 --> 0:37:53.840
<v Speaker 4>it's about climate. We then launch you know, regenerative agricultural

0:37:54.200 --> 0:37:57.880
<v Speaker 4>strategy because one of the key objective is how do

0:37:57.960 --> 0:38:01.319
<v Speaker 4>you capture carbon and there's nothing like you know, the

0:38:01.360 --> 0:38:04.440
<v Speaker 4>soil and the ground, you know, to help do that.

0:38:04.440 --> 0:38:06.760
<v Speaker 4>That's on the equity side. And then we started doing

0:38:07.600 --> 0:38:10.640
<v Speaker 4>some private credit impact financing.

0:38:10.800 --> 0:38:11.600
<v Speaker 3>What does that mean?

0:38:11.920 --> 0:38:15.280
<v Speaker 4>You're a borrower, We're lending you some money at five percent,

0:38:15.400 --> 0:38:17.520
<v Speaker 4>you're three times you know, a BDA. We take all

0:38:17.560 --> 0:38:22.279
<v Speaker 4>the traditional credit metrics of a financial analysis, and then

0:38:22.320 --> 0:38:26.560
<v Speaker 4>we add a third dimension. If you hit certain target,

0:38:26.760 --> 0:38:30.839
<v Speaker 4>certain goals, extra financial goals, then you will improve your

0:38:30.840 --> 0:38:33.600
<v Speaker 4>cost of funding and your five percent coupon will go

0:38:33.680 --> 0:38:36.720
<v Speaker 4>down to four if effectively you demonstrate that you're reduced

0:38:37.120 --> 0:38:41.319
<v Speaker 4>by X or Y or change, you know, this production process,

0:38:42.000 --> 0:38:44.520
<v Speaker 4>and all of a sudden you realize that if your

0:38:44.560 --> 0:38:48.160
<v Speaker 4>cost of funding goes down as a consequence of some

0:38:48.280 --> 0:38:52.040
<v Speaker 4>extra financial goals being met, well your written on equity

0:38:52.120 --> 0:38:56.040
<v Speaker 4>goes up right, And so you can demonstrate that it's

0:38:56.080 --> 0:38:58.720
<v Speaker 4>not about being a philanthropy, it's about you know, making

0:38:58.719 --> 0:39:01.319
<v Speaker 4>sure that we use the capital available to send it,

0:39:01.400 --> 0:39:04.440
<v Speaker 4>you know, where it makes sense, and then all stakeholders,

0:39:04.480 --> 0:39:08.279
<v Speaker 4>you know, a benefit from it. And so as much

0:39:08.280 --> 0:39:12.200
<v Speaker 4>as five years ago it was nice to have and

0:39:12.280 --> 0:39:15.279
<v Speaker 4>once again create not compete, we're trying to push that

0:39:15.400 --> 0:39:16.600
<v Speaker 4>forward today.

0:39:17.000 --> 0:39:17.960
<v Speaker 3>It's not negotiable.

0:39:18.239 --> 0:39:21.359
<v Speaker 4>It's not negotiable with our LPs. It's not negotiable with

0:39:21.360 --> 0:39:24.400
<v Speaker 4>our customers, with our partners, with our banks, with our clients,

0:39:24.760 --> 0:39:26.799
<v Speaker 4>with our staff, Barry, I mean when we talk to

0:39:27.560 --> 0:39:33.000
<v Speaker 4>some of our twenty something thirty something colleagues, professionals, it's

0:39:33.080 --> 0:39:38.640
<v Speaker 4>part of their commitment to the firm because one big

0:39:38.640 --> 0:39:40.360
<v Speaker 4>issue you know, in this when it comes to this

0:39:40.800 --> 0:39:48.160
<v Speaker 4>impact and YESG let's say in the wider sense, at best,

0:39:48.320 --> 0:39:52.040
<v Speaker 4>you can come across very opportunistic. At worst you'll come

0:39:52.080 --> 0:39:56.680
<v Speaker 4>across as fake. And in both situations it's not good.

0:39:56.880 --> 0:40:00.200
<v Speaker 4>And so as you know, our colleagues are staff, you

0:40:00.200 --> 0:40:03.200
<v Speaker 4>know people, and all the stakeholders, I mean there are

0:40:03.239 --> 0:40:04.080
<v Speaker 4>the guardians.

0:40:04.600 --> 0:40:05.600
<v Speaker 3>Uh, they are.

0:40:05.600 --> 0:40:11.000
<v Speaker 4>The truats of us, you know, being real here. So again,

0:40:11.040 --> 0:40:13.200
<v Speaker 4>now it's no longer nice to have. It's a must have,

0:40:13.320 --> 0:40:15.759
<v Speaker 4>and it's uh, there's only one way.

0:40:16.160 --> 0:40:19.320
<v Speaker 2>So ESG seems to have found a lot of support

0:40:19.360 --> 0:40:22.319
<v Speaker 2>in Europe. Are you a little bit surprised about how

0:40:22.360 --> 0:40:25.080
<v Speaker 2>this has become politicized in the US.

0:40:25.600 --> 0:40:26.319
<v Speaker 3>It seems like.

0:40:26.320 --> 0:40:28.720
<v Speaker 2>There are a group of people who are pushing back

0:40:29.360 --> 0:40:34.560
<v Speaker 2>against impact investing, sustainable investing, not because of the returns,

0:40:34.640 --> 0:40:36.640
<v Speaker 2>but they just don't like the politics of it.

0:40:37.080 --> 0:40:40.640
<v Speaker 4>Yep, I'm not surprised because, you know, and again I'm

0:40:40.680 --> 0:40:43.120
<v Speaker 4>an alien here, but you know, I'm I try to

0:40:43.160 --> 0:40:45.000
<v Speaker 4>be an observer, you know, of the dynamic of the

0:40:45.920 --> 0:40:49.760
<v Speaker 4>of the politics here in the USA, and we even

0:40:49.920 --> 0:40:53.520
<v Speaker 4>experiment that ourselves, you know, with some some of our

0:40:53.680 --> 0:40:59.840
<v Speaker 4>LPs very often made up of different boats, some teachers,

0:41:00.000 --> 0:41:05.520
<v Speaker 4>I mean, policemen, you know, employees, you know, public public servants, employees,

0:41:05.560 --> 0:41:10.120
<v Speaker 4>and whilst we were dealing with the same counterparty, the

0:41:10.160 --> 0:41:14.359
<v Speaker 4>same pension fund, some of their constituents, some of the

0:41:14.520 --> 0:41:16.640
<v Speaker 4>underlying boats disagree on.

0:41:16.600 --> 0:41:17.839
<v Speaker 3>The approach to take there.

0:41:18.360 --> 0:41:24.080
<v Speaker 4>So we've experienced that firsthand that within won't given investor,

0:41:24.239 --> 0:41:27.160
<v Speaker 4>you know, asset owner, there could be some divergence and

0:41:27.320 --> 0:41:29.279
<v Speaker 4>very often now I can say, because there was a

0:41:29.320 --> 0:41:35.239
<v Speaker 4>bit of misunderstanding of what we were trying to do and.

0:41:35.160 --> 0:41:38.080
<v Speaker 3>What others, you know, are trying to do so.

0:41:38.440 --> 0:41:41.440
<v Speaker 4>I'm hopeful that with a bit of education, you know,

0:41:41.520 --> 0:41:47.840
<v Speaker 4>the science based approach, people we realize that it's not

0:41:47.920 --> 0:41:49.919
<v Speaker 4>a politic It shouldn't be a political game.

0:41:50.000 --> 0:41:52.240
<v Speaker 3>I understand why. I'm not native.

0:41:52.760 --> 0:41:56.560
<v Speaker 4>I understand why, but I think the majority should prevail

0:41:56.600 --> 0:42:01.280
<v Speaker 4>to understand that the asset owners today, the asset managers

0:42:01.280 --> 0:42:04.440
<v Speaker 4>who can help them deploy, you know, the capitol, have

0:42:04.520 --> 0:42:08.960
<v Speaker 4>an historical mission because we will be we will be

0:42:09.080 --> 0:42:12.680
<v Speaker 4>judging fifty years down down the road. I mean, people

0:42:12.680 --> 0:42:15.920
<v Speaker 4>will look back and say, you know, what did you

0:42:16.040 --> 0:42:19.520
<v Speaker 4>do with the amount of capital that was available back

0:42:19.600 --> 0:42:24.840
<v Speaker 4>then to effectively direct this capitol to to where it matters.

0:42:24.880 --> 0:42:29.120
<v Speaker 4>So I'm trying to take you know, this perspective because effectively,

0:42:29.120 --> 0:42:32.359
<v Speaker 4>we've never been in an environment with so much cheap

0:42:32.400 --> 0:42:34.920
<v Speaker 4>liquidity that could be used purposely.

0:42:35.680 --> 0:42:40.120
<v Speaker 2>So you talked about esg ratchets where people get better

0:42:40.520 --> 0:42:44.560
<v Speaker 2>rates if they hit certain metrics, and you talked a

0:42:44.560 --> 0:42:50.319
<v Speaker 2>little bit about agriculture regenera of agriculture. Explain for those

0:42:50.360 --> 0:42:53.759
<v Speaker 2>of us not familiar with that, what is regenera of agriculture?

0:42:53.840 --> 0:42:55.799
<v Speaker 2>What is the focus? What do you want to accomplish with?

0:42:55.840 --> 0:42:58.040
<v Speaker 2>It is it just carbon capture or is it.

0:42:57.960 --> 0:42:59.319
<v Speaker 3>More it's the whole chain.

0:42:59.360 --> 0:43:03.479
<v Speaker 4>I mean, it's act that you know, soil because without saying,

0:43:03.560 --> 0:43:08.120
<v Speaker 4>is a scarce resource that need to be maintained in

0:43:08.160 --> 0:43:10.440
<v Speaker 4>a way to be able, you know, to keep on

0:43:10.680 --> 0:43:15.560
<v Speaker 4>producing in a way that for the next generation you

0:43:15.600 --> 0:43:18.720
<v Speaker 4>don't look back and you leave you know, a brand

0:43:18.840 --> 0:43:24.440
<v Speaker 4>soil full of fertilizer or or others that.

0:43:24.400 --> 0:43:26.799
<v Speaker 3>Will not be able to.

0:43:28.320 --> 0:43:32.040
<v Speaker 4>Generate the same quality of product you know, for the

0:43:32.040 --> 0:43:34.120
<v Speaker 4>future generation at a time where you'll have to feed

0:43:34.160 --> 0:43:37.080
<v Speaker 4>you know, much more in on people. So the technique

0:43:37.080 --> 0:43:41.440
<v Speaker 4>here very similar to the to the climate approach you know,

0:43:41.480 --> 0:43:44.720
<v Speaker 4>we we took you know, five years ago, is really

0:43:44.760 --> 0:43:48.280
<v Speaker 4>about finding entrepreneurs and the companies who have a solution

0:43:48.719 --> 0:43:53.000
<v Speaker 4>for you know, soil, you know, effectively a fertility let's say.

0:43:52.920 --> 0:43:55.440
<v Speaker 3>Or some technique. You know. It's it's not really the.

0:43:55.400 --> 0:43:57.799
<v Speaker 4>Agri tech as you may you know, be used to,

0:43:57.920 --> 0:44:01.719
<v Speaker 4>but some some techniques have been proven and need this

0:44:01.840 --> 0:44:05.279
<v Speaker 4>capital to scale, and this capital would not be available

0:44:05.520 --> 0:44:08.640
<v Speaker 4>otherwise because it's not about you know, buying land or

0:44:08.680 --> 0:44:11.960
<v Speaker 4>acres of forest. It's not about the agri tech which

0:44:12.000 --> 0:44:17.000
<v Speaker 4>is effectively attracting a lot of a lot of capital.

0:44:17.360 --> 0:44:22.880
<v Speaker 4>But these entrepreneurs, these small cap businesses with the proven

0:44:23.360 --> 0:44:26.680
<v Speaker 4>concept and profitability, and they need this capital, you know,

0:44:26.719 --> 0:44:29.360
<v Speaker 4>to scale. So you would be investing in a twenty

0:44:29.400 --> 0:44:32.320
<v Speaker 4>to thirty percent taking twenty thirty percent of the company,

0:44:32.360 --> 0:44:36.080
<v Speaker 4>investing this capital to effectively help scale the business to

0:44:36.120 --> 0:44:39.400
<v Speaker 4>a size where then you can get to more you know,

0:44:39.880 --> 0:44:43.360
<v Speaker 4>banking financing capital market which you know is not that open.

0:44:43.400 --> 0:44:46.000
<v Speaker 4>So it's this old band. So it's certainly the case

0:44:46.000 --> 0:44:47.799
<v Speaker 4>in Europe. We see it more and more here in

0:44:47.840 --> 0:44:51.839
<v Speaker 4>the US of this small MidCap market that doesn't have

0:44:51.960 --> 0:44:53.760
<v Speaker 4>and even more so coming back to your common about

0:44:53.760 --> 0:44:57.680
<v Speaker 4>the regional banks, you've got part of the financial market

0:44:57.719 --> 0:45:01.160
<v Speaker 4>structure which is disappearing, and so you need the alternative

0:45:01.480 --> 0:45:03.239
<v Speaker 4>source of capital. And so that's where you know, we

0:45:03.280 --> 0:45:05.719
<v Speaker 4>can be a very relevant tool, and that's that for

0:45:05.760 --> 0:45:09.040
<v Speaker 4>the companies and the investors also want to allocate there.

0:45:09.320 --> 0:45:12.359
<v Speaker 2>And you partnered with some really interesting companies on this

0:45:12.600 --> 0:45:17.040
<v Speaker 2>access the big insurer and Unilever, the consumer products company.

0:45:17.560 --> 0:45:21.240
<v Speaker 2>What's their interest in this sort of sustainable investor.

0:45:21.880 --> 0:45:24.520
<v Speaker 4>So one comment, you know, as an aside, is, you know,

0:45:24.719 --> 0:45:28.040
<v Speaker 4>artic here we've always partnered with the or we try

0:45:28.080 --> 0:45:30.400
<v Speaker 4>as much as we can to partner with the corporates

0:45:31.200 --> 0:45:37.080
<v Speaker 4>to bring additional skill set. We did that in energy transition,

0:45:37.280 --> 0:45:41.000
<v Speaker 4>for example, with Total Energies very early on you seventeen eighteen.

0:45:41.800 --> 0:45:45.840
<v Speaker 4>We did that in the aerospace cyber with a bunch

0:45:45.880 --> 0:45:49.239
<v Speaker 4>of preminent European and global players such as you know

0:45:49.560 --> 0:45:54.360
<v Speaker 4>Herbers that so Suffron Taless bringing you know, obviously some capital,

0:45:54.800 --> 0:45:57.160
<v Speaker 4>but more importantly you know, some skill set, some knowledge,

0:45:57.200 --> 0:46:00.600
<v Speaker 4>some rich So that back to my creating compete, we

0:46:00.600 --> 0:46:03.560
<v Speaker 4>can tell a different, you know, a different story.

0:46:03.239 --> 0:46:05.319
<v Speaker 3>With with investors.

0:46:04.760 --> 0:46:08.439
<v Speaker 4>And as I and as you just mentioned, the last

0:46:08.440 --> 0:46:10.279
<v Speaker 4>one you know with UNI Lever, you know is the

0:46:10.360 --> 0:46:15.360
<v Speaker 4>same is exactly the same approach, which is bringing additional

0:46:15.440 --> 0:46:20.399
<v Speaker 4>expertise alongside an asset manager, US financial investors and there's

0:46:20.400 --> 0:46:22.960
<v Speaker 4>no shortage of capital, as we said, you know out

0:46:23.000 --> 0:46:25.280
<v Speaker 4>there in that case, you know, one of the largest

0:46:25.600 --> 0:46:28.840
<v Speaker 4>European insurance company, if not global, and having you know,

0:46:28.880 --> 0:46:33.520
<v Speaker 4>together a different proposal fully aligned with some complimentary with

0:46:33.640 --> 0:46:35.920
<v Speaker 4>some complimentary sourcing.

0:46:35.880 --> 0:46:39.080
<v Speaker 3>To the to the to the deal flow.

0:46:39.840 --> 0:46:42.520
<v Speaker 4>And here again you know, at first people were maybe

0:46:42.560 --> 0:46:44.080
<v Speaker 4>looking at us like, you know, why you need to

0:46:44.080 --> 0:46:46.920
<v Speaker 4>bring a corporate you know, there's some conflict of interest

0:46:47.000 --> 0:46:49.919
<v Speaker 4>involved here, and then a few years you know, down

0:46:49.960 --> 0:46:52.360
<v Speaker 4>the line, they're like, well, that's a very different proposal

0:46:52.640 --> 0:46:55.000
<v Speaker 4>that we may have heard too, you know from all

0:46:55.080 --> 0:46:59.600
<v Speaker 4>the managers, and there are plenty, plenty of out there.

0:47:00.520 --> 0:47:03.680
<v Speaker 2>What's the conflict of interest if you're bringing in a

0:47:03.719 --> 0:47:07.319
<v Speaker 2>consumer product to try and make food on in a

0:47:07.400 --> 0:47:09.800
<v Speaker 2>more efficient, productive, sustainable way.

0:47:10.239 --> 0:47:12.880
<v Speaker 4>Maybe that's my point that they should be known, and

0:47:12.920 --> 0:47:16.440
<v Speaker 4>they are known, but you know, there's you know, people

0:47:16.480 --> 0:47:19.759
<v Speaker 4>at times are a little bit reluctant or resistant, you know,

0:47:19.800 --> 0:47:23.000
<v Speaker 4>to change. And so if that's that quo, it's really powerful,

0:47:23.080 --> 0:47:27.120
<v Speaker 4>isn't it. Well I love this quote of yours. I

0:47:27.120 --> 0:47:28.200
<v Speaker 4>have to ask you about this.

0:47:28.800 --> 0:47:32.680
<v Speaker 2>The longer the happy hour, the harder the hangover, explain,

0:47:33.160 --> 0:47:34.080
<v Speaker 2>very very French.

0:47:34.280 --> 0:47:36.960
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, well that was you know, I think that was

0:47:38.120 --> 0:47:43.239
<v Speaker 4>at Milken's at Milken Institute in May twenty two and

0:47:43.280 --> 0:47:45.839
<v Speaker 4>that's when the interest rates you know, starting to raise.

0:47:46.600 --> 0:47:51.080
<v Speaker 4>And I think I was telling you earlier I was

0:47:51.080 --> 0:47:54.880
<v Speaker 4>surprised to see that many people in surprise because effectively

0:47:54.920 --> 0:47:57.720
<v Speaker 4>the bar had been open for quite a long time

0:47:59.080 --> 0:48:04.760
<v Speaker 4>with very you know, very cheap liquidity, if I may say, available, and.

0:48:05.520 --> 0:48:08.680
<v Speaker 2>Going back to the financial crisis, the entire period that

0:48:08.680 --> 0:48:11.240
<v Speaker 2>followed was free those for everyone exactly.

0:48:11.280 --> 0:48:14.560
<v Speaker 4>And that's you know, that's ten years, if not if

0:48:14.600 --> 0:48:18.239
<v Speaker 4>not more. And some of us, some of us, I think,

0:48:18.520 --> 0:48:23.040
<v Speaker 4>had effectively lost sight that liquidity should have a price

0:48:23.560 --> 0:48:26.799
<v Speaker 4>and credit, you know, has some value, and so effectively

0:48:27.880 --> 0:48:31.919
<v Speaker 4>this you know, the this comment I made was that, yes,

0:48:32.000 --> 0:48:37.960
<v Speaker 4>people are going to have a hangover of this mispriced,

0:48:38.160 --> 0:48:42.919
<v Speaker 4>over leveled asset they may have both invested into as

0:48:42.920 --> 0:48:45.280
<v Speaker 4>a consequence of this free liquidity.

0:48:45.760 --> 0:48:50.640
<v Speaker 2>So let's talk about perhaps a mispriced asset class that

0:48:51.360 --> 0:48:54.560
<v Speaker 2>was relying on free liquidly. As we're recording this, there

0:48:54.640 --> 0:48:58.880
<v Speaker 2>is a recent Wall Street Journal headlined company insiders made

0:48:58.960 --> 0:49:03.120
<v Speaker 2>millions before the SPAC bust. What are your thoughts on

0:49:03.239 --> 0:49:07.600
<v Speaker 2>the SPACs special purpose investment vehicles? How do you look

0:49:07.640 --> 0:49:08.000
<v Speaker 2>at those?

0:49:08.239 --> 0:49:12.360
<v Speaker 4>So we got into Sparks two years ago, hopefully not

0:49:12.440 --> 0:49:16.200
<v Speaker 4>to follow the herd, but because we saw there a

0:49:16.400 --> 0:49:23.120
<v Speaker 4>very useful technology that could help some of our private companies.

0:49:23.160 --> 0:49:24.920
<v Speaker 4>You know that that which is what we do, you know,

0:49:25.000 --> 0:49:29.160
<v Speaker 4>belkof what we do is investing with private entrepreneurs accessing

0:49:29.200 --> 0:49:34.239
<v Speaker 4>the public market with the support of experienced manager, the

0:49:34.239 --> 0:49:38.000
<v Speaker 4>operating partners, you know, with the support of experience you know,

0:49:38.040 --> 0:49:43.319
<v Speaker 4>financial players, and effectively, you know, we are very successfully you.

0:49:43.280 --> 0:49:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Know, unsparked.

0:49:45.040 --> 0:49:49.200
<v Speaker 4>You know some we had. We took public on NeuroNEXT Amsterdam,

0:49:49.239 --> 0:49:55.080
<v Speaker 4>a great company in the TV content production business three

0:49:55.120 --> 0:49:59.480
<v Speaker 4>billion turnover six hundred million a BDA. It's called you

0:49:59.480 --> 0:50:03.879
<v Speaker 4>know fl Entertainment, great entrepreneurs Stefan Koby. It's a real

0:50:03.920 --> 0:50:06.080
<v Speaker 4>company or spack string at I guess you know, ten

0:50:06.120 --> 0:50:09.840
<v Speaker 4>bucks or around real company. So the issue was not

0:50:09.960 --> 0:50:12.680
<v Speaker 4>the Spak as a technology. The issue was, you know,

0:50:12.760 --> 0:50:15.719
<v Speaker 4>the type of company that we're trying to access this

0:50:15.920 --> 0:50:20.800
<v Speaker 4>market opportunistically and rightly, so in front of some capitol

0:50:20.920 --> 0:50:24.560
<v Speaker 4>that had been given to Spaks promoters and managers. Remember

0:50:24.640 --> 0:50:27.839
<v Speaker 4>that interest rates were negative, so you know, Spaks were

0:50:27.960 --> 0:50:32.120
<v Speaker 4>used by some investors as you know, as a vault.

0:50:32.160 --> 0:50:33.280
<v Speaker 3>You know, here's you know, some.

0:50:33.160 --> 0:50:36.000
<v Speaker 4>Cash exactly, I mean, I'll make up you know, for

0:50:36.080 --> 0:50:38.880
<v Speaker 4>the interest you know, shortfall, and I have the option

0:50:38.960 --> 0:50:40.520
<v Speaker 4>you know, to to opt out.

0:50:41.120 --> 0:50:45.439
<v Speaker 2>So so it was a guaranteed higher yield I won't

0:50:45.480 --> 0:50:49.600
<v Speaker 2>say high yields, but higher yield bonds with an equity

0:50:49.640 --> 0:50:52.040
<v Speaker 2>option at the end. If you like the equity company,

0:50:52.520 --> 0:50:52.960
<v Speaker 2>you can.

0:50:52.840 --> 0:50:53.359
<v Speaker 1>Stay with it.

0:50:53.440 --> 0:50:56.080
<v Speaker 2>Cyber Capitals one, a few others did the same thing.

0:50:56.360 --> 0:50:56.560
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:50:56.600 --> 0:50:59.040
<v Speaker 4>The technology itself was you know, excess of cash you know,

0:50:59.160 --> 0:51:04.080
<v Speaker 4>interest rates or or get negative cash or negative interest

0:51:04.160 --> 0:51:05.800
<v Speaker 4>on my cash account. So here's the cash and I

0:51:05.840 --> 0:51:08.160
<v Speaker 4>may opt out. Well, we tried to do in what

0:51:08.239 --> 0:51:11.200
<v Speaker 4>we did and some work. You know, although you know,

0:51:11.239 --> 0:51:13.680
<v Speaker 4>we decided to give back the capitol because back to

0:51:13.719 --> 0:51:17.800
<v Speaker 4>my skin in the game approach, the one we decided

0:51:17.840 --> 0:51:21.759
<v Speaker 4>to return the capitol that was last you know, last month,

0:51:22.719 --> 0:51:26.280
<v Speaker 4>we had you know, one hundred and fifty million plus

0:51:26.560 --> 0:51:29.839
<v Speaker 4>of our own capital committed to it. So rather than

0:51:29.960 --> 0:51:33.560
<v Speaker 4>chasing you know, the cheap option with the view of

0:51:34.280 --> 0:51:38.160
<v Speaker 4>hopefully making you know, the the return embeddied with the option.

0:51:38.239 --> 0:51:40.719
<v Speaker 4>We're like, first and foremost, we're deplaying our capital. The

0:51:41.120 --> 0:51:43.000
<v Speaker 4>opportunity is not there. You know, We're not going to

0:51:43.120 --> 0:51:44.720
<v Speaker 4>deploy a capital for the sake of it.

0:51:44.760 --> 0:51:46.719
<v Speaker 2>This comes back to skin in the game. When you're

0:51:46.760 --> 0:51:50.760
<v Speaker 2>a co investor with your LPs, you don't make dumb

0:51:50.800 --> 0:51:53.239
<v Speaker 2>decisions because hey, we have the cash, we might as

0:51:53.280 --> 0:51:54.160
<v Speaker 2>well spend it.

0:51:54.239 --> 0:51:57.919
<v Speaker 4>I think so, and So that was just I think

0:51:57.960 --> 0:52:02.200
<v Speaker 4>a misuse of a new interesting technique with some investors

0:52:02.760 --> 0:52:06.000
<v Speaker 4>and a misuse of interesting techniques for the wrong company.

0:52:06.160 --> 0:52:11.600
<v Speaker 2>So I read a piece recently, a research piece that said, uh,

0:52:12.000 --> 0:52:15.439
<v Speaker 2>Brexit may have taken as much as five percent off

0:52:15.440 --> 0:52:20.480
<v Speaker 2>the total GDP of the United Kingdom. You worked in London,

0:52:20.520 --> 0:52:24.920
<v Speaker 2>you're now in New York originally from from Paris. Does

0:52:24.960 --> 0:52:28.840
<v Speaker 2>that sound realistic? What was the impact of Brexit on

0:52:29.160 --> 0:52:32.680
<v Speaker 2>the UK and and who has stepped into the void

0:52:33.280 --> 0:52:34.719
<v Speaker 2>that brexfast teed up.

0:52:36.840 --> 0:52:38.960
<v Speaker 4>So first of all, that's a decision that was made,

0:52:39.000 --> 0:52:41.520
<v Speaker 4>you know, by the by the British people, and you know,

0:52:41.520 --> 0:52:43.920
<v Speaker 4>I will not comment on the on the rational. Beyond that,

0:52:44.520 --> 0:52:48.640
<v Speaker 4>I read the same studios you know that you mentioned,

0:52:49.239 --> 0:52:52.040
<v Speaker 4>and every day I would talk to some France entrepreneurs

0:52:52.200 --> 0:52:55.720
<v Speaker 4>you in Europe telling me how challenging it has become

0:52:55.800 --> 0:52:57.840
<v Speaker 4>and you know, just to move goods and things you know,

0:52:57.880 --> 0:53:00.839
<v Speaker 4>into and just your trading you know with you. The

0:53:00.880 --> 0:53:05.600
<v Speaker 4>one part I can comment on was the whole debate

0:53:06.520 --> 0:53:09.640
<v Speaker 4>around the future of the city of London as a

0:53:09.680 --> 0:53:11.880
<v Speaker 4>prominent financial place global.

0:53:11.960 --> 0:53:12.719
<v Speaker 3>But obviously you.

0:53:12.640 --> 0:53:15.719
<v Speaker 4>Know European well, I can tell you Barry is. You know,

0:53:15.800 --> 0:53:19.400
<v Speaker 4>since you know the world reopen and you can travel again.

0:53:19.960 --> 0:53:22.680
<v Speaker 4>I'm actually going back more often to London than to

0:53:22.760 --> 0:53:25.319
<v Speaker 4>Paris nowadays, which is my you know, the headquarter of

0:53:25.320 --> 0:53:29.759
<v Speaker 4>my firm. Why that because London remains you know, a

0:53:29.880 --> 0:53:34.600
<v Speaker 4>critical business center, you know, for financial services. There are

0:53:34.640 --> 0:53:38.080
<v Speaker 4>some challenging associated with from some regulation, you know, you

0:53:38.080 --> 0:53:39.919
<v Speaker 4>know in the way you have to trade and white

0:53:39.960 --> 0:53:43.560
<v Speaker 4>people and banks you know, had to had to open

0:53:44.280 --> 0:53:48.560
<v Speaker 4>or export some branches onto the continent. And I understand

0:53:48.600 --> 0:53:52.560
<v Speaker 4>why and that, you know, technicalities, but when it comes

0:53:52.600 --> 0:54:02.759
<v Speaker 4>to the cosmopolitan nature of London attracting global talents and

0:54:02.800 --> 0:54:06.080
<v Speaker 4>as much as I'm French, and Paris has been doing

0:54:06.120 --> 0:54:10.840
<v Speaker 4>a tremendous job attracting talents and firms, but the scale

0:54:11.120 --> 0:54:15.400
<v Speaker 4>is such that I wouldn't bet against London as a

0:54:15.440 --> 0:54:21.640
<v Speaker 4>financial center. So we have to cope with technical aspects,

0:54:21.680 --> 0:54:24.319
<v Speaker 4>you know, regulation, cost of doing business for some has

0:54:24.320 --> 0:54:30.040
<v Speaker 4>become very punitive if you don't have the scale. And

0:54:30.120 --> 0:54:32.960
<v Speaker 4>that's why, you know, if I'm a bit selfish in

0:54:33.000 --> 0:54:37.520
<v Speaker 4>the approach. We were fully equipped on the continent to

0:54:37.600 --> 0:54:41.200
<v Speaker 4>start with. We're now moving back more aggressively into London

0:54:41.239 --> 0:54:47.319
<v Speaker 4>because we were less over exposed when many people are

0:54:47.360 --> 0:54:49.760
<v Speaker 4>doing the country. You know, people are trying to reduce

0:54:49.880 --> 0:54:54.000
<v Speaker 4>their investmental location to the UK, their workforce in the UK.

0:54:54.040 --> 0:54:56.160
<v Speaker 4>So we're trying to be a bit contriant and taking

0:54:56.200 --> 0:54:56.880
<v Speaker 4>advantage of that.

0:54:57.560 --> 0:55:03.040
<v Speaker 2>So people overreacted in one direction. It's opportunities. Maybe Europe

0:55:03.120 --> 0:55:08.359
<v Speaker 2>is dealing with a war on its eastern border. What

0:55:08.480 --> 0:55:13.040
<v Speaker 2>has the Russian invasion of Ukraine done in terms of

0:55:14.080 --> 0:55:19.480
<v Speaker 2>energy supplies and just the entire relationship of Europe with Russia.

0:55:19.880 --> 0:55:23.480
<v Speaker 4>Well, it's it's a complicated one. It's a very sad

0:55:23.600 --> 0:55:27.400
<v Speaker 4>one because I can tell you Barris sitting here in

0:55:27.440 --> 0:55:30.360
<v Speaker 4>the US and and when I talked to france family

0:55:30.440 --> 0:55:32.880
<v Speaker 4>over there, the perception of the war is very different

0:55:33.680 --> 0:55:36.799
<v Speaker 4>from one side to the of the pont to the

0:55:37.000 --> 0:55:40.080
<v Speaker 4>to the other because the reality that it's as we

0:55:40.200 --> 0:55:42.640
<v Speaker 4>you know, it's two hours away from many of the

0:55:42.680 --> 0:55:46.799
<v Speaker 4>Western European capital and the perception the filling with the

0:55:46.800 --> 0:55:49.040
<v Speaker 4>population you know, is very you know, is very different.

0:55:49.120 --> 0:55:54.239
<v Speaker 4>So having said that, remember a year ago when the

0:55:55.000 --> 0:55:59.480
<v Speaker 4>war started, obviously the concern about you know, energy independence,

0:56:00.080 --> 0:56:04.960
<v Speaker 4>sustainability was was front and center. That was a I

0:56:05.000 --> 0:56:08.120
<v Speaker 4>think the silver lining of the situation to put more

0:56:08.640 --> 0:56:12.400
<v Speaker 4>light and focus on accelerating you know, part of the

0:56:12.520 --> 0:56:16.359
<v Speaker 4>transition and in itself, you know, that's that that was

0:56:16.400 --> 0:56:19.800
<v Speaker 4>an encouraging step. Looking backwards, you know you're into or

0:56:19.840 --> 0:56:23.200
<v Speaker 4>eighteen months now, you know, into this situation. It's not

0:56:23.320 --> 0:56:26.600
<v Speaker 4>as bad I mean quote unquote on the energy side,

0:56:27.480 --> 0:56:30.759
<v Speaker 4>which is a good news, but the whole situation, you know,

0:56:30.840 --> 0:56:34.520
<v Speaker 4>which I think we are unfortunately stuck stuck with, you know,

0:56:34.640 --> 0:56:39.160
<v Speaker 4>for a relatively long period of time, as creating a

0:56:39.160 --> 0:56:41.240
<v Speaker 4>lot of uncertainty you know in the in the region

0:56:41.800 --> 0:56:45.400
<v Speaker 4>and beyond, but also by the same token, a lot

0:56:45.480 --> 0:56:51.760
<v Speaker 4>of political willingness you know, to move to move quicker.

0:56:51.800 --> 0:56:56.400
<v Speaker 4>And the response if you remember that the European government

0:56:56.480 --> 0:56:59.440
<v Speaker 4>made right after the war, I mean they made more

0:56:59.480 --> 0:57:01.759
<v Speaker 4>progress a matter of in a few weeks then we

0:57:01.800 --> 0:57:03.200
<v Speaker 4>had on you know, in a few years. And so

0:57:03.520 --> 0:57:08.480
<v Speaker 4>at times it's it's effectively when the essential is at

0:57:08.480 --> 0:57:10.759
<v Speaker 4>stake that people can react constructively.

0:57:10.920 --> 0:57:14.719
<v Speaker 2>So the concern, aside from all the humanitarian tragedy of

0:57:14.760 --> 0:57:19.040
<v Speaker 2>the invasion was oil prices with spike, it would eventually

0:57:19.600 --> 0:57:23.240
<v Speaker 2>lead to recession in Europe. But a lot of Europe

0:57:23.240 --> 0:57:26.720
<v Speaker 2>seems to have avoided that. What are your thoughts about

0:57:26.920 --> 0:57:32.040
<v Speaker 2>greater Europe tipping into a recession? And pretty clear parts

0:57:32.040 --> 0:57:36.000
<v Speaker 2>of Europe have slowed down dramatically because of the increased

0:57:36.000 --> 0:57:39.560
<v Speaker 2>costs and dealing with the war. What does the environment

0:57:39.600 --> 0:57:40.360
<v Speaker 2>in Europe look.

0:57:40.280 --> 0:57:40.560
<v Speaker 3>Like to you?

0:57:40.880 --> 0:57:44.480
<v Speaker 4>So not this similar to what we're experiencing here in

0:57:44.480 --> 0:57:47.960
<v Speaker 4>the US and the reshoring you know of production capacity.

0:57:48.120 --> 0:57:52.120
<v Speaker 4>We're seeing that in many countries across Europe. Re industrialization

0:57:52.440 --> 0:57:54.640
<v Speaker 4>has been you know, probably the most popular world of

0:57:55.240 --> 0:57:58.880
<v Speaker 4>politician you know lately, not only because you need to

0:57:59.040 --> 0:58:02.800
<v Speaker 4>demonstrate less dependency you know, to outside market.

0:58:03.000 --> 0:58:06.080
<v Speaker 3>The whole de globalization you know theme.

0:58:06.600 --> 0:58:10.840
<v Speaker 4>I think it was accelerating by this whole situation, and

0:58:10.920 --> 0:58:13.680
<v Speaker 4>so for politicians, you know, it's a way to show,

0:58:13.720 --> 0:58:17.840
<v Speaker 4>you know, a direction for the population. It's a new paradigm,

0:58:17.880 --> 0:58:20.400
<v Speaker 4>a new software and coming back to what we do

0:58:20.480 --> 0:58:23.200
<v Speaker 4>for a living, you know, asset manager, it's a great

0:58:23.360 --> 0:58:28.440
<v Speaker 4>frame in you know, finding ways to allocate, reallocate, working

0:58:28.480 --> 0:58:32.440
<v Speaker 4>with global investors to attract more capital in certain you know,

0:58:32.680 --> 0:58:37.360
<v Speaker 4>countries or for certain industries. It's not happening overnight, but

0:58:37.440 --> 0:58:41.959
<v Speaker 4>you can make it happen fairly quickly. Fairly quickly being

0:58:42.000 --> 0:58:44.080
<v Speaker 4>you know, a matter of months. If you've got all

0:58:44.120 --> 0:58:47.640
<v Speaker 4>these stars aligned from the political direction you know, to

0:58:47.720 --> 0:58:51.960
<v Speaker 4>the to the population adhasion, and then you know.

0:58:52.040 --> 0:58:53.960
<v Speaker 3>The capital allocation.

0:58:54.120 --> 0:58:56.200
<v Speaker 4>And so if you you know, I'm hopeful and I'm

0:58:56.240 --> 0:58:59.160
<v Speaker 4>optimistic that that could be, that could be the civil

0:58:59.200 --> 0:59:03.160
<v Speaker 4>lining of the whole situation as dramatic, you know, the

0:59:04.560 --> 0:59:05.440
<v Speaker 4>situation can be.

0:59:05.880 --> 0:59:11.040
<v Speaker 2>So you have offices in Asia. If we're deglobalizing to

0:59:11.120 --> 0:59:15.160
<v Speaker 2>some degree, and China has been the big industrial driver

0:59:15.680 --> 0:59:17.640
<v Speaker 2>of much of the world, what does it mean for

0:59:17.720 --> 0:59:22.160
<v Speaker 2>investing in Asia generally, but more specifically China.

0:59:22.760 --> 0:59:26.160
<v Speaker 4>So what we've been doing in Asia, first out of

0:59:26.200 --> 0:59:31.680
<v Speaker 4>Singapore where we were we started eight nine years ago

0:59:31.720 --> 0:59:34.920
<v Speaker 4>in Singapore, and then Korea and Japan. We don't have

0:59:34.960 --> 0:59:37.919
<v Speaker 4>any presence in China as a matter of fact, and

0:59:38.560 --> 0:59:42.680
<v Speaker 4>the dialogue we had with these investors locally was really

0:59:42.680 --> 0:59:47.560
<v Speaker 4>about attracting them to some of our existing strategies in

0:59:47.600 --> 0:59:49.920
<v Speaker 4>Europe or in the US.

0:59:51.000 --> 0:59:51.400
<v Speaker 3>Asia.

0:59:51.800 --> 0:59:54.640
<v Speaker 4>Is I have the chance, you know, to go back there,

0:59:54.640 --> 0:59:57.160
<v Speaker 4>you know from time to time, and each time I'm there,

0:59:57.360 --> 1:00:00.200
<v Speaker 4>I found you know, local economies that have and you

1:00:00.240 --> 1:00:03.560
<v Speaker 4>know transform. If you look at Singapore what it was

1:00:03.600 --> 1:00:06.520
<v Speaker 4>when we first moved there and you know eight years later,

1:00:07.040 --> 1:00:09.440
<v Speaker 4>I mean that's that's a global hub. Like a global

1:00:09.480 --> 1:00:11.680
<v Speaker 4>hub with all the consequences you're reading every day, you know,

1:00:11.800 --> 1:00:13.720
<v Speaker 4>the Bloomberg News, you know the price of real estate

1:00:13.760 --> 1:00:17.000
<v Speaker 4>and the numbers of family offices who moved from Hong

1:00:17.080 --> 1:00:19.200
<v Speaker 4>Kong from part of the Middle East. You know, to

1:00:19.240 --> 1:00:21.520
<v Speaker 4>open there for the very same reason that you have created,

1:00:21.560 --> 1:00:27.200
<v Speaker 4>you know, a great talent hub, a very business friendly environment.

1:00:27.720 --> 1:00:28.600
<v Speaker 3>You know, you've got the.

1:00:28.480 --> 1:00:32.200
<v Speaker 4>Most sophisticated sovereign wealth funds in the world. We were

1:00:32.280 --> 1:00:35.800
<v Speaker 4>lucky enough, you know, to have Temasek backing us as

1:00:35.840 --> 1:00:38.240
<v Speaker 4>wely you know as twenty sixteen. I've been a great

1:00:38.280 --> 1:00:41.880
<v Speaker 4>partner ever since. Great place, you know, great marketplace. And

1:00:41.920 --> 1:00:44.520
<v Speaker 4>so the way we look at our single properations today.

1:00:44.920 --> 1:00:47.400
<v Speaker 4>You know, we have a headquarter Paris, and we have

1:00:47.520 --> 1:00:51.240
<v Speaker 4>three global hubs New York, London, Singapore and all of

1:00:51.280 --> 1:00:53.680
<v Speaker 4>these hubs, you know, then you can reach on a

1:00:53.720 --> 1:00:58.400
<v Speaker 4>global basis, first investors and effective you're tracking them where

1:00:58.440 --> 1:01:01.760
<v Speaker 4>we think there is an interesting investment posle and also

1:01:01.840 --> 1:01:05.000
<v Speaker 4>creating investment, you know, opportunities when you've got this supply

1:01:05.160 --> 1:01:08.280
<v Speaker 4>demand imbalance. Again, it all comes down to supply demand

1:01:08.320 --> 1:01:11.120
<v Speaker 4>and how we can best take advantage of that.

1:01:11.720 --> 1:01:14.960
<v Speaker 2>Really interesting, So let's jump to our favorite questions that

1:01:15.040 --> 1:01:18.680
<v Speaker 2>we ask all of our guests, starting with what have

1:01:18.880 --> 1:01:22.640
<v Speaker 2>you been streaming these days? What's been keeping you informed

1:01:23.040 --> 1:01:26.840
<v Speaker 2>and entertained? Either podcast or Netflix or whatever.

1:01:27.720 --> 1:01:30.200
<v Speaker 4>One I like and I recommend, but because that's being

1:01:30.280 --> 1:01:33.760
<v Speaker 4>produced by this company we backed that we took, we

1:01:33.880 --> 1:01:37.240
<v Speaker 4>helped take you know, public a few months ago. Is

1:01:37.280 --> 1:01:41.400
<v Speaker 4>the Peaky Blinders. That's great entertainment, and only because I love,

1:01:41.440 --> 1:01:44.040
<v Speaker 4>you know, this whole story about you know, the villain

1:01:44.120 --> 1:01:46.800
<v Speaker 4>and the gangsters and all that, but more eputently because

1:01:46.840 --> 1:01:47.320
<v Speaker 4>that's great.

1:01:47.920 --> 1:01:49.280
<v Speaker 2>Is that Netflix or Amazona?

1:01:49.400 --> 1:01:51.920
<v Speaker 4>It's a Netflix one. It's a Netflix one I strongly

1:01:51.960 --> 1:01:55.080
<v Speaker 4>recommend and produced by our friend at fl Entertainment.

1:01:55.560 --> 1:01:59.360
<v Speaker 2>Really interesting. So who were your mentors who helped to

1:01:59.480 --> 1:02:00.480
<v Speaker 2>shape your career?

1:02:01.640 --> 1:02:08.280
<v Speaker 4>So few of them are senior people I worked for

1:02:08.320 --> 1:02:11.120
<v Speaker 4>when I was a young analyst, you know, an associate,

1:02:11.640 --> 1:02:14.120
<v Speaker 4>because every one of them, in their own, you know,

1:02:14.560 --> 1:02:19.640
<v Speaker 4>different approach, helped me challenge the fact that we are

1:02:19.640 --> 1:02:21.920
<v Speaker 4>going on our own at a relatively young age, you know,

1:02:21.960 --> 1:02:25.440
<v Speaker 4>for this business. Some of them telling us, well, it's

1:02:25.440 --> 1:02:28.320
<v Speaker 4>either too late or too early for good or bad reasons.

1:02:28.800 --> 1:02:32.400
<v Speaker 4>And on the contrary, people saying, which was less the

1:02:32.440 --> 1:02:34.240
<v Speaker 4>case is in Europe than it can be the case

1:02:34.280 --> 1:02:36.400
<v Speaker 4>here in the US. There's never a good time, and

1:02:36.440 --> 1:02:39.240
<v Speaker 4>you should give it a go, you know. And so

1:02:40.480 --> 1:02:44.400
<v Speaker 4>many of them were finance professional most of the time

1:02:44.440 --> 1:02:49.160
<v Speaker 4>in investment banking and still remained and I've still remain,

1:02:49.200 --> 1:02:51.160
<v Speaker 4>you know, friends. Some of them join us by the

1:02:51.200 --> 1:02:55.240
<v Speaker 4>way along the way, you know, at at TKO. And

1:02:55.280 --> 1:02:58.480
<v Speaker 4>there's that's one thing that she was very valuable. When

1:02:58.480 --> 1:02:59.880
<v Speaker 4>you start your own venture.

1:03:00.200 --> 1:03:02.000
<v Speaker 2>What are some of your favorite books? What are you

1:03:02.040 --> 1:03:02.960
<v Speaker 2>reading right now?

1:03:04.040 --> 1:03:08.520
<v Speaker 4>So two books I've started very different. The first one

1:03:09.560 --> 1:03:12.480
<v Speaker 4>I was lucky to turn one of the again Mike

1:03:12.560 --> 1:03:16.560
<v Speaker 4>Milkan's you know Evan you know recently both in La

1:03:16.640 --> 1:03:19.200
<v Speaker 4>and then Leon and as you know, is extremely focused

1:03:19.200 --> 1:03:25.080
<v Speaker 4>on healthcare and the whole focus is putting through his

1:03:25.200 --> 1:03:31.680
<v Speaker 4>institute and the all the philanthropy around there. And the book,

1:03:32.000 --> 1:03:35.720
<v Speaker 4>you know, the book is called Faster Cures Accelerating the

1:03:35.720 --> 1:03:39.640
<v Speaker 4>Future of Health, you know, by Mike Milkan, is something

1:03:39.680 --> 1:03:43.480
<v Speaker 4>which is fascinating because you know, in a job day

1:03:43.520 --> 1:03:45.680
<v Speaker 4>to day you know, it's really you know, short term,

1:03:45.760 --> 1:03:47.360
<v Speaker 4>and when you step back a bit and you look

1:03:47.400 --> 1:03:50.200
<v Speaker 4>a little bit of these demographic issues. You know, we

1:03:50.280 --> 1:03:52.320
<v Speaker 4>touch based on some of those issues, you know, energy

1:03:52.320 --> 1:03:55.840
<v Speaker 4>and all that, but the demographic is probably the most

1:03:56.280 --> 1:04:00.520
<v Speaker 4>challenging one. And even if it's fifty seventy five from now,

1:04:00.800 --> 1:04:04.000
<v Speaker 4>I think we should start factoring in you know, many

1:04:04.000 --> 1:04:08.160
<v Speaker 4>of that, you know, in Today's Decision and the other book,

1:04:08.200 --> 1:04:11.720
<v Speaker 4>you know, more recent I was lucky to meet a

1:04:11.800 --> 1:04:18.320
<v Speaker 4>French professor in Boston who's teacher both at HBS and HKS.

1:04:18.680 --> 1:04:21.000
<v Speaker 3>She's been there for twenty years, you know.

1:04:21.040 --> 1:04:24.960
<v Speaker 4>Her name is Julie Batilana. And the last book is

1:04:24.960 --> 1:04:29.000
<v Speaker 4>called Power for All, and it's all about you know,

1:04:29.040 --> 1:04:32.800
<v Speaker 4>the relationship to I would say even power, but if

1:04:32.800 --> 1:04:36.120
<v Speaker 4>effectively power is about having an influence on making someone

1:04:36.160 --> 1:04:39.520
<v Speaker 4>else change behavior. How it's not only top down and

1:04:39.560 --> 1:04:41.440
<v Speaker 4>the way we may have learned it, and how we

1:04:41.480 --> 1:04:47.960
<v Speaker 4>should with the new generation in a new cycle, and

1:04:48.120 --> 1:04:51.320
<v Speaker 4>the perspective of things that are you know critical to me,

1:04:51.400 --> 1:04:55.480
<v Speaker 4>which are you democracy but also capitalism which is fueling

1:04:55.480 --> 1:04:57.560
<v Speaker 4>many of that. How do you reconcile you know all that,

1:04:57.640 --> 1:04:59.960
<v Speaker 4>And it's worthwhile reading sounds entry.

1:05:00.760 --> 1:05:04.200
<v Speaker 2>Our last two questions, what sort of advice would you

1:05:04.240 --> 1:05:07.640
<v Speaker 2>give to a recent college graduate who is interested in

1:05:07.680 --> 1:05:11.080
<v Speaker 2>a career in either private equity or investing.

1:05:11.920 --> 1:05:15.160
<v Speaker 4>Well, I would Sandymno. Some of the motos were using

1:05:15.200 --> 1:05:20.320
<v Speaker 4>every day at TKO Capital. Be curious, think out of

1:05:20.360 --> 1:05:24.800
<v Speaker 4>the box, be on the ball, think big. You know,

1:05:24.840 --> 1:05:29.520
<v Speaker 4>I will share that with them because that's one thing

1:05:29.640 --> 1:05:33.720
<v Speaker 4>that doesn't change. Technology may change, but you know, interpersonal

1:05:34.160 --> 1:05:39.040
<v Speaker 4>skill set and being being hungry, I think that's what matters.

1:05:39.520 --> 1:05:42.640
<v Speaker 2>Interesting And our final question, what do you know about

1:05:42.640 --> 1:05:45.920
<v Speaker 2>the world of investing today you wish you knew twenty

1:05:45.920 --> 1:05:48.480
<v Speaker 2>five or so years ago when you were first getting started.

1:05:49.240 --> 1:05:51.080
<v Speaker 3>Never take anything for granted.

1:05:52.000 --> 1:05:55.080
<v Speaker 2>Thank you so much for being so generous with your time, Matthew.

1:05:55.160 --> 1:05:58.880
<v Speaker 2>We have been speaking with Matthew Chebron, co founder of

1:05:58.960 --> 1:06:02.600
<v Speaker 2>TKO Capital. If you enjoy this conversation, well, be sure

1:06:02.640 --> 1:06:05.120
<v Speaker 2>and check out any of the other five hundred or

1:06:05.160 --> 1:06:09.200
<v Speaker 2>so discussions we've had over the past eight or so years.

1:06:09.360 --> 1:06:13.640
<v Speaker 2>You can find those at iTunes, Spotify, YouTube, wherever you

1:06:13.720 --> 1:06:17.360
<v Speaker 2>find your favorite podcast. Sign up for my daily reading

1:06:17.400 --> 1:06:20.560
<v Speaker 2>list at Rittholts dot com. Follow me on Twitter, at

1:06:20.640 --> 1:06:24.400
<v Speaker 2>rit Holts follow all of the Bloomberg Family of podcasts

1:06:24.440 --> 1:06:28.520
<v Speaker 2>on Twitter at podcast I would be remiss if I

1:06:28.520 --> 1:06:30.960
<v Speaker 2>did not thank the crack team that helps put the

1:06:31.000 --> 1:06:35.680
<v Speaker 2>conversations together each week. My audio engineer is Sebastian Escobar.

1:06:36.200 --> 1:06:39.280
<v Speaker 2>My producer is Paris walt A. Teak of val Bron

1:06:39.400 --> 1:06:42.360
<v Speaker 2>is our project manager. Sean Russeau is my head of research.

1:06:42.840 --> 1:06:46.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm Barry Ridholts. You've been listening to Masters in Business

1:06:47.160 --> 1:06:48.320
<v Speaker 2>on Bloomberg Radio.