WEBVTT - Tech News: Microsoft Scrambles to Save Activision Deal

0:00:04.440 --> 0:00:12.319
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from iHeartRadio. Hey there,

0:00:12.320 --> 0:00:15.840
<v Speaker 1>and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host Jonathan Strickland.

0:00:15.840 --> 0:00:18.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm an executive producer with iHeartRadio. And how the tech

0:00:19.040 --> 0:00:21.720
<v Speaker 1>are you. It's time for the tech news for Tuesday,

0:00:21.800 --> 0:00:24.880
<v Speaker 1>July eighteenth, twenty twenty three, and let's get to it.

0:00:25.680 --> 0:00:29.720
<v Speaker 1>CNBC reports that Amaud Mustok, who is the CEO of

0:00:29.760 --> 0:00:34.440
<v Speaker 1>Stability AI, has predicted that artificial intelligence will eliminate coder

0:00:34.800 --> 0:00:38.800
<v Speaker 1>jobs that previously had been outsourced to India. That AI

0:00:39.200 --> 0:00:43.239
<v Speaker 1>is going to require a smaller human staff, and artificial

0:00:43.240 --> 0:00:45.320
<v Speaker 1>intelligence will do a lot of work at a pace

0:00:45.360 --> 0:00:48.440
<v Speaker 1>that's far faster than humans typically can match, and thus

0:00:48.520 --> 0:00:53.840
<v Speaker 1>will be more economically viable for companies. Moreover, Mustok's point

0:00:53.880 --> 0:00:57.920
<v Speaker 1>indicates the level of protection workers can expect based on

0:00:58.120 --> 0:01:02.240
<v Speaker 1>where they live. In the India, such protections are scarce,

0:01:02.720 --> 0:01:05.639
<v Speaker 1>so it isn't a stretch to imagine a future where

0:01:05.800 --> 0:01:09.600
<v Speaker 1>tech companies downsize to cut costs related to staffing and

0:01:09.680 --> 0:01:12.600
<v Speaker 1>start to lean heavily on AI. But most Stock says

0:01:12.680 --> 0:01:16.600
<v Speaker 1>other places such as France will take efforts to protect

0:01:16.680 --> 0:01:19.640
<v Speaker 1>human employees, and so tech companies in France won't have

0:01:19.720 --> 0:01:23.960
<v Speaker 1>the same options as those in India. Mustoc also clarified

0:01:23.959 --> 0:01:27.680
<v Speaker 1>his prediction. He said that coders will be an obsolete

0:01:27.760 --> 0:01:31.000
<v Speaker 1>job in a few years, but that programmers will not be.

0:01:31.640 --> 0:01:35.000
<v Speaker 1>He says, the programmers of the future will rely heavily

0:01:35.040 --> 0:01:38.800
<v Speaker 1>on AI to actually write the code, but things like

0:01:39.000 --> 0:01:43.280
<v Speaker 1>ideation or testing bugs, that kind of stuff that's still

0:01:43.280 --> 0:01:46.360
<v Speaker 1>going to need human counterparts. So while certain aspects of

0:01:46.400 --> 0:01:49.680
<v Speaker 1>programming could be eliminated, AI wouldn't be able to take

0:01:49.720 --> 0:01:53.960
<v Speaker 1>on all the roles that a programmer traditionally performs. Still,

0:01:54.000 --> 0:01:56.320
<v Speaker 1>I imagine we're going to see a lot more disruption

0:01:56.520 --> 0:02:01.880
<v Speaker 1>across multiple industries as companies experiment with AI. I imagine

0:02:02.040 --> 0:02:04.360
<v Speaker 1>more than a few companies will give into the temptation

0:02:04.920 --> 0:02:08.280
<v Speaker 1>to eliminate a large number of jobs in favor of

0:02:08.360 --> 0:02:12.440
<v Speaker 1>artificial intelligence. And once again I sigh, because this kind

0:02:12.440 --> 0:02:16.080
<v Speaker 1>of strategy is ultimately self defeating in the long run

0:02:16.120 --> 0:02:19.680
<v Speaker 1>in my opinion. By that, I mean, if AI ends

0:02:19.760 --> 0:02:23.560
<v Speaker 1>up displacing lots of people and those people now find

0:02:23.560 --> 0:02:26.920
<v Speaker 1>it difficult to land a job that pays a living wage,

0:02:27.480 --> 0:02:30.280
<v Speaker 1>then you begin to drain the consumer base. And once

0:02:30.320 --> 0:02:33.519
<v Speaker 1>the consumer base is gone, well, now there's no one

0:02:33.639 --> 0:02:36.560
<v Speaker 1>left to buy products and services. And once that happens,

0:02:36.600 --> 0:02:40.680
<v Speaker 1>the businesses which were so good at cutting costs and

0:02:40.760 --> 0:02:45.640
<v Speaker 1>maximizing profits while revenue perhaps remained steady, they're gonna see

0:02:45.639 --> 0:02:47.679
<v Speaker 1>revenue drop because no one will be able to buy

0:02:47.680 --> 0:02:50.720
<v Speaker 1>their stuff because no one has a job anymore, because

0:02:50.720 --> 0:02:53.560
<v Speaker 1>the robots took them all. And before you know it,

0:02:54.240 --> 0:02:57.000
<v Speaker 1>the robots are just making stuff for other robots, and

0:02:57.040 --> 0:02:59.360
<v Speaker 1>the rest of us are going, what the heck do

0:02:59.440 --> 0:03:03.760
<v Speaker 1>we do now? Meanwhile, advocates for universal basic income will

0:03:03.800 --> 0:03:08.040
<v Speaker 1>go bonkers. What a world. Reuter's reports that Microsoft is

0:03:08.080 --> 0:03:13.120
<v Speaker 1>working to extend its acquisition agreement with Activision Blizzard. So

0:03:13.480 --> 0:03:17.440
<v Speaker 1>the original agreement between these two companies set today as

0:03:17.480 --> 0:03:21.440
<v Speaker 1>the deadline for completing the deal. But we have seen

0:03:22.000 --> 0:03:26.280
<v Speaker 1>opposition from regulatory authorities that have introduced lots of hiccups

0:03:26.280 --> 0:03:29.120
<v Speaker 1>along the way. And last week a court dismissed the

0:03:29.240 --> 0:03:33.640
<v Speaker 1>US Federal Trade Commission's request for an injunction to at

0:03:33.720 --> 0:03:38.520
<v Speaker 1>least temporarily block this deal. That request was denied, and

0:03:38.560 --> 0:03:41.520
<v Speaker 1>that removed one impediment, But there's still a roadblock in place,

0:03:41.560 --> 0:03:45.360
<v Speaker 1>and that's the UK's Competition in Market's Authority or CMA,

0:03:45.600 --> 0:03:49.840
<v Speaker 1>which previously voted to block this acquisition, so that block

0:03:50.440 --> 0:03:53.280
<v Speaker 1>is still in effect, and while Microsoft and Activision Blizzard

0:03:53.320 --> 0:03:56.640
<v Speaker 1>attempt to persuade UK regulators that the deal will not

0:03:56.840 --> 0:03:59.760
<v Speaker 1>decrease competition in the video game space and the c

0:04:00.320 --> 0:04:03.600
<v Speaker 1>gaming space in particular, the deadline for the deal is

0:04:03.640 --> 0:04:06.800
<v Speaker 1>still in effect, and so according to Reuter's, Microsoft is

0:04:06.800 --> 0:04:09.400
<v Speaker 1>trying to work out a deal with Activision Blizzard to

0:04:09.600 --> 0:04:12.800
<v Speaker 1>extend this contract to give more time to clear those

0:04:12.840 --> 0:04:17.000
<v Speaker 1>regulatory hurdles in the UK. So what are the possible

0:04:17.040 --> 0:04:20.560
<v Speaker 1>outcomes here, Well, the one I think that is most

0:04:20.640 --> 0:04:23.760
<v Speaker 1>likely is that Activision Blizzard will agree to an extension.

0:04:24.520 --> 0:04:28.360
<v Speaker 1>Maybe the company will negotiate some additional terms in the process,

0:04:28.400 --> 0:04:31.040
<v Speaker 1>but I think that's what's going to happen. Another possibility

0:04:31.080 --> 0:04:34.160
<v Speaker 1>is that Activision Blizzard walks away and just remains its

0:04:34.160 --> 0:04:37.800
<v Speaker 1>own company. A third possibility is that Activision Blizzard, sensing

0:04:38.279 --> 0:04:41.400
<v Speaker 1>that it has increased importance and value in the market,

0:04:41.839 --> 0:04:45.440
<v Speaker 1>looks for a different suitor, one that we'll spend even

0:04:45.440 --> 0:04:48.840
<v Speaker 1>more money to acquire it than Microsoft would. I think

0:04:48.880 --> 0:04:52.400
<v Speaker 1>that last possibility is the least likely, but I'm also

0:04:52.440 --> 0:04:55.360
<v Speaker 1>no expert on corporate maneuvers, so it's entirely possible I'm

0:04:55.400 --> 0:04:59.400
<v Speaker 1>missing something obvious. Anyway, the agreement to extend the contract

0:04:59.440 --> 0:05:02.360
<v Speaker 1>will need to have or not happen by the end

0:05:02.520 --> 0:05:07.200
<v Speaker 1>of today. A new law in Norway will take aim

0:05:07.360 --> 0:05:11.520
<v Speaker 1>at Meta's main revenue strategy when it goes active in August,

0:05:11.640 --> 0:05:17.839
<v Speaker 1>and that is personalized advertising. Meta famously leverages the gargantuan

0:05:17.960 --> 0:05:21.440
<v Speaker 1>amount of information it collects from users as they interact

0:05:21.520 --> 0:05:26.320
<v Speaker 1>on platforms like Instagram and Facebook and beyond. To learn

0:05:26.320 --> 0:05:29.160
<v Speaker 1>more about that, read up on Meta Pixel. That'll tell

0:05:29.160 --> 0:05:32.200
<v Speaker 1>you about how Meta has a tool that can be

0:05:33.839 --> 0:05:38.800
<v Speaker 1>imprinted in someone else's web page that delivers information to them,

0:05:38.920 --> 0:05:42.640
<v Speaker 1>but also to Meta itself. Anyway, all this information is

0:05:42.720 --> 0:05:45.640
<v Speaker 1>gold to advertisers. They want to deliver just the right

0:05:45.680 --> 0:05:49.240
<v Speaker 1>message to just the right audience to maximize effectiveness, and

0:05:49.320 --> 0:05:51.719
<v Speaker 1>so for years now, Meta has been in the business

0:05:51.720 --> 0:05:55.920
<v Speaker 1>of selling premier ad services to companies with the implication

0:05:56.080 --> 0:05:58.520
<v Speaker 1>that the advertising campaigns are going to be far more

0:05:58.560 --> 0:06:02.280
<v Speaker 1>effective than if you just put out messaging in front

0:06:02.320 --> 0:06:05.520
<v Speaker 1>of a randomized crowd of people. If you want to

0:06:05.520 --> 0:06:09.440
<v Speaker 1>sell backpacks and tents, well, Meta knows which people are

0:06:09.520 --> 0:06:12.120
<v Speaker 1>keen to go outdoors and rough it do you want

0:06:12.120 --> 0:06:15.920
<v Speaker 1>to sell baby accessories and supplies? Well, Meta knows which

0:06:16.000 --> 0:06:19.320
<v Speaker 1>users are new parents. But Norway has now passed a

0:06:19.440 --> 0:06:23.440
<v Speaker 1>law making it illegal for Meta to practice targeted advertising,

0:06:23.520 --> 0:06:27.560
<v Speaker 1>and should it utilize that strategy in Norway, it could

0:06:27.560 --> 0:06:31.640
<v Speaker 1>face a daily fine of one hundred thousand dollars, so

0:06:31.680 --> 0:06:36.120
<v Speaker 1>one hundred grand every day unless Meta changes its approach,

0:06:36.360 --> 0:06:40.120
<v Speaker 1>at least its approach in Norway. Now, some people are

0:06:40.440 --> 0:06:43.880
<v Speaker 1>estimating already that while one hundred thousand dollars is really

0:06:43.920 --> 0:06:49.039
<v Speaker 1>nothing to Meta, a multi billion dollar company, the amount

0:06:49.040 --> 0:06:52.679
<v Speaker 1>that it makes while operating in Norway is likely less

0:06:52.680 --> 0:06:56.760
<v Speaker 1>than one hundred thousand dollars a day. So that means

0:06:56.800 --> 0:06:59.680
<v Speaker 1>that to operate in Norway, Meta would be doing so

0:06:59.760 --> 0:07:02.200
<v Speaker 1>at all loss. And what's more, Norway is urging other

0:07:02.279 --> 0:07:06.080
<v Speaker 1>countries to form similar legislation. Now this really kind of

0:07:06.160 --> 0:07:10.800
<v Speaker 1>dates back to in twenty twenty two, the Irish Data

0:07:10.800 --> 0:07:14.720
<v Speaker 1>Protection Commission, which is a major regulator in the European Union,

0:07:15.280 --> 0:07:20.040
<v Speaker 1>decided that Meta's approach to quote unquote behavioral advertising breaks

0:07:20.280 --> 0:07:23.760
<v Speaker 1>EU law. Metta subsequently made some adjustments to the way

0:07:23.760 --> 0:07:28.000
<v Speaker 1>it does business, but according to various people, including the

0:07:28.040 --> 0:07:31.880
<v Speaker 1>Irish regulators. Those changes failed to fix the problem and

0:07:31.960 --> 0:07:34.800
<v Speaker 1>they did not bring META into compliance with the law,

0:07:35.240 --> 0:07:39.080
<v Speaker 1>so Norwegian legislators, seeing a need for action, created this approach.

0:07:39.120 --> 0:07:42.120
<v Speaker 1>I should also add Norway is not part of the

0:07:42.160 --> 0:07:44.960
<v Speaker 1>European Union. They are part of the European Single Market,

0:07:45.040 --> 0:07:47.560
<v Speaker 1>but not in the EU. They're not a member of

0:07:47.600 --> 0:07:50.360
<v Speaker 1>the EU. It will be interesting to see how META

0:07:50.360 --> 0:07:53.880
<v Speaker 1>response to this and if other countries in Europe follow

0:07:53.960 --> 0:07:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Norway's lead. Tesla's board of directors has decided to settle

0:07:58.040 --> 0:08:02.480
<v Speaker 1>a lawsuit brought against it a retirement fund that represents

0:08:02.520 --> 0:08:08.120
<v Speaker 1>police and firefighters. The group accused Tesla of paying themselves

0:08:08.680 --> 0:08:11.920
<v Speaker 1>too much in Tesla stock and by Tesla, I mean

0:08:11.960 --> 0:08:15.320
<v Speaker 1>specifically they're board of directors. So as a consequence, the

0:08:15.360 --> 0:08:20.280
<v Speaker 1>directors are collectively returning seven hundred and thirty five million

0:08:20.480 --> 0:08:24.120
<v Speaker 1>dollars worth of stock options. So the lawsuit had argued

0:08:24.200 --> 0:08:27.360
<v Speaker 1>that these directors had voted to award themselves far more

0:08:27.400 --> 0:08:32.280
<v Speaker 1>stock options than a board typically would receive. And on

0:08:32.320 --> 0:08:35.520
<v Speaker 1>that board are well Elon Musk is on it, his

0:08:35.600 --> 0:08:39.400
<v Speaker 1>brother Kimball is on it. James Murdoch, the son of

0:08:39.640 --> 0:08:43.680
<v Speaker 1>Rupert Murdoch, The media Mogul, he's on it. Joe Grebia,

0:08:43.800 --> 0:08:46.760
<v Speaker 1>one of the co founders of Airbnb, he's on it.

0:08:47.160 --> 0:08:51.520
<v Speaker 1>And finally JB. Strabel, who was previously Tesla's chief technology officer,

0:08:51.640 --> 0:08:54.840
<v Speaker 1>is on the board. So Tesla reps said that the

0:08:54.920 --> 0:08:57.880
<v Speaker 1>idea was to align the board of directors with the

0:08:57.920 --> 0:09:01.920
<v Speaker 1>needs and successes of the company. Right, because your compensation

0:09:02.360 --> 0:09:07.440
<v Speaker 1>is a stock option, then your compensation increases in value

0:09:07.640 --> 0:09:11.760
<v Speaker 1>if the company's stock price increases, So that was the logic,

0:09:11.880 --> 0:09:15.439
<v Speaker 1>they said. Also, I should mention that Elon Musk is

0:09:15.480 --> 0:09:18.800
<v Speaker 1>facing a separate legal challenge relating to his own compensation

0:09:18.880 --> 0:09:22.160
<v Speaker 1>package at Tesla. That's a package that awards Musk fifty

0:09:22.240 --> 0:09:26.240
<v Speaker 1>six billion with a B dollars, which I can't even

0:09:26.320 --> 0:09:30.120
<v Speaker 1>begin to comprehend that amount of money. No wonder must

0:09:30.120 --> 0:09:34.480
<v Speaker 1>doesn't seem too fussed with the continuing descent of Twitter's value,

0:09:35.120 --> 0:09:38.840
<v Speaker 1>and he's got Tesla just totally to fall back on.

0:09:39.679 --> 0:09:43.160
<v Speaker 1>But Tesla also faces other challenges. This week, the US

0:09:43.280 --> 0:09:48.040
<v Speaker 1>National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, or NHTSA, announced it was

0:09:48.120 --> 0:09:51.800
<v Speaker 1>launching a new investigation into an old crash, a crash

0:09:51.880 --> 0:09:55.000
<v Speaker 1>that happened in twenty eighteen that involved a Tesla Model

0:09:55.080 --> 0:09:58.880
<v Speaker 1>three that may have been in advanced driver assists mode

0:09:58.960 --> 0:10:02.680
<v Speaker 1>at the time of the act. The NHTSA typically will

0:10:02.720 --> 0:10:06.079
<v Speaker 1>engage in around one hundred crash investigations in a year

0:10:06.559 --> 0:10:09.680
<v Speaker 1>for cases where emerging technology had played a part in

0:10:09.720 --> 0:10:12.880
<v Speaker 1>the crash. While this accident happened five years ago, there

0:10:12.880 --> 0:10:16.199
<v Speaker 1>have sadly been no shortage of accidents involving Tesla vehicles

0:10:16.240 --> 0:10:19.079
<v Speaker 1>in some form of self driving mode now. According to

0:10:19.120 --> 0:10:22.880
<v Speaker 1>the Washington Post, since twenty nineteen, there have been seven

0:10:23.000 --> 0:10:26.680
<v Speaker 1>hundred and thirty six accidents with seventeen fatalities that involved

0:10:26.720 --> 0:10:30.680
<v Speaker 1>a Tesla either in autopilot or full self driving mode.

0:10:31.120 --> 0:10:35.440
<v Speaker 1>The NHTSA numbers are actually lower than that. They identify

0:10:35.600 --> 0:10:40.000
<v Speaker 1>two hundred and seventy three crashes and launched investigations into

0:10:40.000 --> 0:10:43.520
<v Speaker 1>more of forty of those. Fourteen of those crashes resulted

0:10:43.600 --> 0:10:46.760
<v Speaker 1>in fatalities. Okay, we're going to take a quick break.

0:10:46.800 --> 0:10:48.920
<v Speaker 1>When we come back, we've got some more tech news

0:10:48.960 --> 0:11:01.640
<v Speaker 1>to talk about. We're back. Reddit is still feeling the

0:11:01.679 --> 0:11:05.880
<v Speaker 1>consequences of the platform's change in its API policy. So

0:11:06.000 --> 0:11:09.720
<v Speaker 1>quick reminder, Reddit, but in a new fee structure for

0:11:09.800 --> 0:11:14.400
<v Speaker 1>developers who use the platform's API to develop third party apps,

0:11:14.640 --> 0:11:17.120
<v Speaker 1>so developers have to pay Reddit based upon the number

0:11:17.160 --> 0:11:20.199
<v Speaker 1>of times their apps reference Reddit, which can include stuff

0:11:20.200 --> 0:11:25.600
<v Speaker 1>like pulling information or posting information to Reddit. The decision

0:11:25.720 --> 0:11:27.960
<v Speaker 1>pushed a lot of developers to shut down their apps.

0:11:28.080 --> 0:11:30.960
<v Speaker 1>They explained they just couldn't afford to pay those fees

0:11:31.040 --> 0:11:33.960
<v Speaker 1>because of the number of times their apps would reference

0:11:33.960 --> 0:11:37.640
<v Speaker 1>Reddit and the popularity of those apps. So a ton

0:11:37.679 --> 0:11:40.240
<v Speaker 1>of Reddit users got really mad because they depended on

0:11:40.280 --> 0:11:43.920
<v Speaker 1>those apps to access Reddit. The platform's own mobile app

0:11:44.280 --> 0:11:48.600
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have the best reputation among a lot of redditors anyway.

0:11:48.640 --> 0:11:51.679
<v Speaker 1>The latest brew haha the site is that Reddit has

0:11:51.800 --> 0:11:55.080
<v Speaker 1>changed its chat system, and as a consequence of that,

0:11:55.720 --> 0:11:58.560
<v Speaker 1>users can now only look at their chat histories from

0:11:58.640 --> 0:12:02.280
<v Speaker 1>January first, twenty three up to the present day. Anything

0:12:02.280 --> 0:12:05.840
<v Speaker 1>that was older, anything that was posted before January first

0:12:05.840 --> 0:12:10.880
<v Speaker 1>of this year is gonzo. Understandably, this has upset a

0:12:10.920 --> 0:12:13.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of people for various reasons. You know, some folks

0:12:13.520 --> 0:12:16.679
<v Speaker 1>were holding on to older messages as a touchstone of

0:12:16.720 --> 0:12:19.280
<v Speaker 1>a friend or loved one that they had no longer

0:12:19.320 --> 0:12:22.360
<v Speaker 1>been in touch with for whatever reason. Some were keeping

0:12:22.400 --> 0:12:26.760
<v Speaker 1>information for the purposes of future work, and now all

0:12:26.760 --> 0:12:31.400
<v Speaker 1>of that information is unavailable when you access your chat history. Now,

0:12:31.440 --> 0:12:34.000
<v Speaker 1>this change didn't happen out of the blue. Reddit actually

0:12:34.000 --> 0:12:37.080
<v Speaker 1>communicated it late last month in a change log, but

0:12:37.160 --> 0:12:39.960
<v Speaker 1>that didn't get that much attention or coverage at that time,

0:12:41.080 --> 0:12:44.040
<v Speaker 1>and Reddit didn't exactly take steps to reach out to

0:12:44.120 --> 0:12:46.600
<v Speaker 1>users and let them know it's coming. So in a way,

0:12:46.840 --> 0:12:48.720
<v Speaker 1>this is a bit like that Hitchhiker's Guide to the

0:12:48.760 --> 0:12:52.720
<v Speaker 1>Galaxy segment where Arthur Den explains that the plans for

0:12:52.800 --> 0:12:56.520
<v Speaker 1>demolishing his house were technically on quote unquote public display,

0:12:57.080 --> 0:13:00.600
<v Speaker 1>but they were stored in a disused lavatory that had

0:13:00.600 --> 0:13:04.280
<v Speaker 1>a sign on it reading Beware of the Leopard. Anyway,

0:13:04.520 --> 0:13:07.960
<v Speaker 1>the good news is that, according to AndroidPolice dot Com,

0:13:08.080 --> 0:13:10.960
<v Speaker 1>redditors can get their chat history by sending a data

0:13:11.000 --> 0:13:13.440
<v Speaker 1>request to Reddit to get a download of all of

0:13:13.480 --> 0:13:15.600
<v Speaker 1>your messages, which should include the ones that are no

0:13:15.679 --> 0:13:19.120
<v Speaker 1>longer accessible in chat. So there is a way to

0:13:19.120 --> 0:13:21.680
<v Speaker 1>still get that information, but you do have to reach

0:13:21.679 --> 0:13:24.440
<v Speaker 1>out and submit a data request to Reddit in order

0:13:24.440 --> 0:13:26.880
<v Speaker 1>to get it. The New York Police Department announced it

0:13:26.920 --> 0:13:32.040
<v Speaker 1>will test out a new emergency announcement system courtesy of drones,

0:13:32.400 --> 0:13:37.080
<v Speaker 1>So if you had flying robots warning of imminent danger

0:13:37.160 --> 0:13:41.080
<v Speaker 1>on your dystopian bingo card. Congratulations, you can mark that

0:13:41.240 --> 0:13:45.000
<v Speaker 1>square off. The plan, the police say is to deploy

0:13:45.080 --> 0:13:49.000
<v Speaker 1>the drones to high risk areas that emergency situations like

0:13:49.120 --> 0:13:53.079
<v Speaker 1>a severe weather event could impact. So recently, New York

0:13:53.080 --> 0:13:55.640
<v Speaker 1>has had problems with flooding as heavy rains have moved

0:13:55.679 --> 0:13:58.560
<v Speaker 1>through the city, and more flooding is expected this weekend,

0:13:58.880 --> 0:14:02.040
<v Speaker 1>so that prompted the NYPD to announce the test of

0:14:02.080 --> 0:14:05.760
<v Speaker 1>the system. While alerting locals to potential threats is important,

0:14:05.800 --> 0:14:08.800
<v Speaker 1>there's another concern that these drones could pull double duty

0:14:08.840 --> 0:14:12.880
<v Speaker 1>and serve as surveillance devices, and that's not nearly as cool.

0:14:13.480 --> 0:14:16.240
<v Speaker 1>And in fact, there are laws meant to protect citizens

0:14:16.280 --> 0:14:19.440
<v Speaker 1>in New York from such surveillance, and that includes the

0:14:19.480 --> 0:14:22.600
<v Speaker 1>requirement that the NYPD issue an impact statement on its

0:14:22.640 --> 0:14:25.880
<v Speaker 1>website and open up the policy to public comment, and

0:14:25.920 --> 0:14:28.920
<v Speaker 1>that that has to happen at least ninety days before

0:14:28.960 --> 0:14:32.920
<v Speaker 1>the NYPD actually deploys the technology. Now, there are questions

0:14:32.920 --> 0:14:35.800
<v Speaker 1>as to whether this particular use of drones would trigger

0:14:35.880 --> 0:14:40.080
<v Speaker 1>that policy. It's possible that NYPD doesn't need to go

0:14:40.120 --> 0:14:43.440
<v Speaker 1>to those steps, because if this is just a case

0:14:43.640 --> 0:14:46.480
<v Speaker 1>of the organization using existing tech in a new way

0:14:46.680 --> 0:14:50.160
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to rolling out an entirely new system. They

0:14:50.200 --> 0:14:53.920
<v Speaker 1>don't have to follow the same requirements anyway. Critics say

0:14:53.920 --> 0:14:56.280
<v Speaker 1>there are plenty of other ways that law enforcement can

0:14:56.320 --> 0:14:59.960
<v Speaker 1>reach out to citizens without throwing flying robots into the mix,

0:15:00.200 --> 0:15:02.000
<v Speaker 1>and that the use of such text seems like it's

0:15:02.040 --> 0:15:04.400
<v Speaker 1>trying to fix a problem with the wrong kind of tool.

0:15:05.320 --> 0:15:08.640
<v Speaker 1>Now in the department of driving Jonathan insane, we have

0:15:08.760 --> 0:15:11.680
<v Speaker 1>our penultimate story of Chuck Schumer, the leader of the

0:15:11.680 --> 0:15:15.720
<v Speaker 1>political majority in the US Senate, and Senator Mike Rownds,

0:15:15.880 --> 0:15:18.720
<v Speaker 1>who have jointly proposed an amendment to the National Defense

0:15:18.760 --> 0:15:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Authorization Act. This amendment would require the Executive branch to

0:15:23.200 --> 0:15:28.520
<v Speaker 1>share records relating to unidentified anomalous phenomena or UAPs, and

0:15:28.640 --> 0:15:31.160
<v Speaker 1>that the Executive branch would have to share the information

0:15:31.200 --> 0:15:34.680
<v Speaker 1>with Congress. So essentially, the way the story is being reported,

0:15:35.040 --> 0:15:37.760
<v Speaker 1>at least in some circles, is that Chucky boy here

0:15:37.840 --> 0:15:40.600
<v Speaker 1>wants to know about the aliens, or at least stuff

0:15:40.640 --> 0:15:44.040
<v Speaker 1>made by non human intelligence, which could include aliens, but

0:15:44.080 --> 0:15:46.240
<v Speaker 1>I guess it could also include stuff like I don't know,

0:15:46.560 --> 0:15:51.840
<v Speaker 1>robots or alternate dimension, Nicola Tesla's or something. Anyway, the

0:15:51.880 --> 0:15:55.200
<v Speaker 1>amendment argues that the executive branch is quote hiding that

0:15:55.280 --> 0:15:58.960
<v Speaker 1>information from both Congress and the public at large end quote,

0:15:59.360 --> 0:16:02.400
<v Speaker 1>and Schumer's that the public has quote a right to

0:16:02.480 --> 0:16:07.280
<v Speaker 1>learn about technologies of unknown origins, non human intelligence, and

0:16:07.440 --> 0:16:14.400
<v Speaker 1>unexplainable phenomena end quote. Now, y'all, you don't know this

0:16:14.600 --> 0:16:17.680
<v Speaker 1>because I edited it out, but I followed that last

0:16:17.680 --> 0:16:22.000
<v Speaker 1>sentence with a really, really long sigh because I think

0:16:22.040 --> 0:16:25.840
<v Speaker 1>this is just gonna fuel countless French theories about alien

0:16:25.880 --> 0:16:28.240
<v Speaker 1>civilizations and the like, when the truth of the matter

0:16:28.320 --> 0:16:31.280
<v Speaker 1>is that UAP is just really a catch all category

0:16:31.760 --> 0:16:35.600
<v Speaker 1>to describe situations in which someone saw something and where

0:16:35.720 --> 0:16:38.640
<v Speaker 1>they were unable to identify what it was, and that's

0:16:38.680 --> 0:16:43.040
<v Speaker 1>pretty much it. So that something could be incredibly mundane.

0:16:43.080 --> 0:16:45.480
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not just talking about like the old weather

0:16:45.600 --> 0:16:48.440
<v Speaker 1>balloons and swamp gas stuff that you hear, but even

0:16:48.480 --> 0:16:51.240
<v Speaker 1>things like I don't know the reflection of the moon

0:16:51.560 --> 0:16:56.560
<v Speaker 1>on the water, so UAP's that doesn't even necessarily imply

0:16:56.920 --> 0:17:00.560
<v Speaker 1>any sort of vehicle or technology, and the cases where

0:17:00.600 --> 0:17:03.600
<v Speaker 1>we are talking about technology that can include, you know,

0:17:03.920 --> 0:17:09.600
<v Speaker 1>prototypes of things like spy planes or military drones, and

0:17:09.960 --> 0:17:12.159
<v Speaker 1>that's the sort of stuff that countries don't like to

0:17:12.480 --> 0:17:14.879
<v Speaker 1>publicize because you know, they plan on using that on

0:17:15.000 --> 0:17:17.679
<v Speaker 1>other countries, so they tend to keep quiet about it.

0:17:18.280 --> 0:17:20.760
<v Speaker 1>But that doesn't mean that other people don't occasionally see

0:17:20.760 --> 0:17:23.359
<v Speaker 1>that stuff, and of course they can't identify it because it,

0:17:23.720 --> 0:17:26.879
<v Speaker 1>up to that point had been a secret vehicle. So

0:17:28.280 --> 0:17:32.439
<v Speaker 1>it's really not necessary that any of this stuff was

0:17:32.560 --> 0:17:36.399
<v Speaker 1>of non human origin. I also think if we're talking

0:17:36.440 --> 0:17:39.399
<v Speaker 1>non terrestrial, like if we're saying alien, I still think

0:17:39.880 --> 0:17:42.919
<v Speaker 1>that that is incredibly unlikely, almost to the point of

0:17:42.960 --> 0:17:45.359
<v Speaker 1>being impossible, because you have to keep in mind the

0:17:45.480 --> 0:17:48.800
<v Speaker 1>vast distances in space and how long it takes even

0:17:48.880 --> 0:17:54.000
<v Speaker 1>light to travel those vast distances. That's a lot. And

0:17:54.440 --> 0:17:57.240
<v Speaker 1>as long as we as a species have been able

0:17:57.280 --> 0:18:00.240
<v Speaker 1>to make radio waves, which is, you know, a little

0:18:00.240 --> 0:18:02.840
<v Speaker 1>more than a century, and most of those radio ways

0:18:02.880 --> 0:18:05.800
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't have reached very far out into space before they

0:18:06.040 --> 0:18:08.440
<v Speaker 1>got to a point where they weren't even really detectable.

0:18:09.040 --> 0:18:11.439
<v Speaker 1>It's just not realistic that anyone would have even noticed

0:18:11.480 --> 0:18:14.720
<v Speaker 1>we were here, let alone made the trip out here

0:18:14.760 --> 0:18:18.840
<v Speaker 1>to see what was up. Maybe it would involve technologies

0:18:18.880 --> 0:18:20.840
<v Speaker 1>that we just can't even imagine yet that would break

0:18:20.840 --> 0:18:22.920
<v Speaker 1>the laws of physics as we understand them, but that

0:18:22.960 --> 0:18:25.600
<v Speaker 1>would probably require so much energy as to raise the

0:18:25.680 --> 0:18:27.879
<v Speaker 1>question of why would you go to that kind of

0:18:27.920 --> 0:18:31.960
<v Speaker 1>effort to see the chuckle heads who occupy this planet?

0:18:32.280 --> 0:18:36.199
<v Speaker 1>It just it doesn't add up to me, Like it

0:18:36.240 --> 0:18:41.159
<v Speaker 1>doesn't make sense as a possibility. So I think this

0:18:41.240 --> 0:18:46.879
<v Speaker 1>is really just gonna create more suspicion and conspiracy theories

0:18:46.920 --> 0:18:49.360
<v Speaker 1>and fringe theories and that kind of stuff, and it's

0:18:49.359 --> 0:18:54.280
<v Speaker 1>not gonna really amount to anything substantial, But I guess

0:18:54.280 --> 0:18:57.679
<v Speaker 1>we'll see. Okay. The last bit I have for you

0:18:57.840 --> 0:19:01.359
<v Speaker 1>is an article recommendation. So other board over Advice has

0:19:01.400 --> 0:19:04.520
<v Speaker 1>posted an article titled Amazon told drivers not to worry

0:19:04.560 --> 0:19:08.879
<v Speaker 1>about in van surveillance cameras now footage is leaking online.

0:19:09.000 --> 0:19:12.159
<v Speaker 1>It was written by Jewles Roscoe. It's a great article

0:19:12.200 --> 0:19:15.160
<v Speaker 1>that reinforces something I mentioned in yesterday's tech Stuff episode

0:19:15.160 --> 0:19:18.280
<v Speaker 1>that even if the technology itself is benign, I would

0:19:18.359 --> 0:19:21.800
<v Speaker 1>argue surveillance equipment does not fall into that category. There

0:19:21.840 --> 0:19:24.239
<v Speaker 1>are still people who will behave as people and they

0:19:24.240 --> 0:19:26.560
<v Speaker 1>will do the wrong thing on occasion. So in this case,

0:19:26.560 --> 0:19:30.080
<v Speaker 1>it involves watching and at least in some cases, leaking

0:19:30.200 --> 0:19:33.760
<v Speaker 1>or sharing in vehicle surveillance footage, which Amazon claimed was

0:19:33.840 --> 0:19:36.520
<v Speaker 1>only meant to monitor drivers for the purposes of safety.

0:19:37.160 --> 0:19:40.919
<v Speaker 1>So there you go. That's your article recommendation. And as always,

0:19:40.920 --> 0:19:44.080
<v Speaker 1>I have no connection with Motherboard or Vice or Jewels Roscoe.

0:19:44.160 --> 0:19:46.160
<v Speaker 1>I just thought it was a good article and it's

0:19:46.160 --> 0:19:49.440
<v Speaker 1>worth your attention. That's it for the news for Tuesday,

0:19:49.560 --> 0:19:52.800
<v Speaker 1>July eighteenth, twenty twenty three. I hope you are all

0:19:52.920 --> 0:20:03.040
<v Speaker 1>well and I'll talk to you again really soon. Tech

0:20:03.119 --> 0:20:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Stuff is an iHeartRadio production. For more podcasts from iHeartRadio,

0:20:07.840 --> 0:20:11.560
<v Speaker 1>visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen

0:20:11.600 --> 0:20:12.679
<v Speaker 1>to your favorite shows.