WEBVTT - Messaging Matters

0:00:11.800 --> 0:00:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Good morning, peeps, and welcome to wikay F Daily with

0:00:14.440 --> 0:00:18.400
<v Speaker 1>Meet your Girl Danielle Moody. Recording from the Home Bunker. Folks,

0:00:18.640 --> 0:00:22.479
<v Speaker 1>this show is being pre recorded in honoring of the

0:00:22.640 --> 0:00:25.959
<v Speaker 1>Martin Luther King Junior Holiday, and so I wanted to

0:00:26.000 --> 0:00:30.640
<v Speaker 1>bring back to the show my friend Kaivon Shroff, who

0:00:30.840 --> 0:00:35.320
<v Speaker 1>is a Democratic commentator and all around ivy leaguer when

0:00:35.360 --> 0:00:38.720
<v Speaker 1>it comes to political science, to give us some insight

0:00:38.840 --> 0:00:41.320
<v Speaker 1>into his thoughts on where he thinks that the Democrats

0:00:41.360 --> 0:00:44.440
<v Speaker 1>are going to be in twenty twenty three. We go

0:00:44.520 --> 0:00:48.199
<v Speaker 1>off on a conversation largely around how this is a

0:00:48.320 --> 0:00:52.640
<v Speaker 1>prime opportunity with Democrats in the minority in the House.

0:00:52.680 --> 0:00:55.880
<v Speaker 1>And again, folks, only by four votes are they in

0:00:55.920 --> 0:01:00.000
<v Speaker 1>the minority in the House. But this is the prime

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:03.760
<v Speaker 1>opportunity for Democrats to hone their messaging. And we talk

0:01:03.800 --> 0:01:09.319
<v Speaker 1>about the real start contrast between Kevin McCarthy's acceptance speech,

0:01:09.360 --> 0:01:11.760
<v Speaker 1>if you can call it that, after fourteen failed vote

0:01:11.760 --> 0:01:14.080
<v Speaker 1>attempts that becoming Speaker of the House, which he has

0:01:14.120 --> 0:01:18.840
<v Speaker 1>hollowed out because of his decision to give away everything

0:01:18.880 --> 0:01:22.160
<v Speaker 1>including the kitchen sink to the far right, reaching quote

0:01:22.240 --> 0:01:26.040
<v Speaker 1>unquote freedom Caucus and the speech that was given by

0:01:26.319 --> 0:01:31.280
<v Speaker 1>incoming Minority Leader Hakim Jefferies. And so, one of the

0:01:31.319 --> 0:01:34.360
<v Speaker 1>things that you've heard me talk about regularly on woke

0:01:34.600 --> 0:01:38.039
<v Speaker 1>F is the inability of Democrats to have a cohesive

0:01:38.720 --> 0:01:44.520
<v Speaker 1>national messaging strategy that has us distill the very complicated

0:01:44.560 --> 0:01:46.880
<v Speaker 1>policies and ideas that we try and put forth for

0:01:47.000 --> 0:01:51.440
<v Speaker 1>the American people in something that is easily digestible. Now, look,

0:01:51.560 --> 0:01:55.000
<v Speaker 1>we know that hate is readily easily digestible. We also

0:01:55.080 --> 0:01:57.040
<v Speaker 1>know that the truth need not get in the way

0:01:57.080 --> 0:02:00.000
<v Speaker 1>of a good story as it pertains to the far right.

0:02:00.080 --> 0:02:06.320
<v Speaker 1>But with Democrats in this space, have an opportunity because

0:02:06.360 --> 0:02:09.160
<v Speaker 1>here's the thing, we know, no policies are going to

0:02:09.160 --> 0:02:14.320
<v Speaker 1>be put forth. You could barely get a speaker chosen

0:02:14.480 --> 0:02:17.400
<v Speaker 1>with the first four days of Republicans supposed to be

0:02:17.800 --> 0:02:21.639
<v Speaker 1>wielding the gavel, let alone any major legislation. I mean,

0:02:21.680 --> 0:02:23.959
<v Speaker 1>one of the first things that Kevin McCarthy talked about

0:02:24.240 --> 0:02:28.720
<v Speaker 1>was defunding the IRS and more investigations into the federal government,

0:02:28.800 --> 0:02:31.080
<v Speaker 1>none of which is going to do anything for the

0:02:31.120 --> 0:02:35.320
<v Speaker 1>average American. So what does a messaging strategy look like

0:02:35.400 --> 0:02:39.160
<v Speaker 1>by Democrats? What does it mean to consistently over the

0:02:39.200 --> 0:02:42.400
<v Speaker 1>next two years, remind the American people who is actually

0:02:42.480 --> 0:02:45.680
<v Speaker 1>voting for their best interests when it comes to lowering

0:02:45.680 --> 0:02:49.720
<v Speaker 1>prescription drug prices, when it comes to looking at infrastructure,

0:02:49.760 --> 0:02:53.000
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to our public school situation in terms

0:02:53.040 --> 0:02:55.560
<v Speaker 1>of oh, I don't know, changing up full on curriculum

0:02:55.680 --> 0:02:58.400
<v Speaker 1>to make sure that we continue with the white supremacy

0:02:58.440 --> 0:03:02.040
<v Speaker 1>propaganda that we instilling young people instead of teaching them

0:03:02.040 --> 0:03:05.000
<v Speaker 1>the truth. When we look at all of these things,

0:03:05.800 --> 0:03:08.360
<v Speaker 1>we know that it is Democrats that are fighting for

0:03:08.400 --> 0:03:12.679
<v Speaker 1>the American people and Republicans that have aligned themselves with

0:03:12.800 --> 0:03:16.760
<v Speaker 1>our foreign enemies, looking at you Russia, looking at the House,

0:03:16.840 --> 0:03:19.720
<v Speaker 1>Republicans deciding that they don't want to continue to help

0:03:19.840 --> 0:03:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Ukraine continue their fight for democracy and against Putin because

0:03:24.120 --> 0:03:27.799
<v Speaker 1>you know, putinist Trump's BFF. So I think that there

0:03:27.880 --> 0:03:31.080
<v Speaker 1>is a major opportunity in the coming two years of

0:03:31.120 --> 0:03:34.080
<v Speaker 1>the circus that we are in for for Democrats to

0:03:34.240 --> 0:03:38.960
<v Speaker 1>really set an agenda, a stark agenda and clear narrative

0:03:39.080 --> 0:03:41.920
<v Speaker 1>that shows the American people who the adults are in

0:03:41.960 --> 0:03:49.720
<v Speaker 1>the room. So, coming up next my conversation with Kaivan Shroff. Folks,

0:03:49.720 --> 0:03:53.760
<v Speaker 1>I am really happy to welcome back to woke f

0:03:53.960 --> 0:03:59.520
<v Speaker 1>Kaivan Streff, who is a Democratic commentator and has is

0:03:59.640 --> 0:04:03.000
<v Speaker 1>a cleated with Harvard Law, MPP from the Kennedy School,

0:04:03.080 --> 0:04:06.360
<v Speaker 1>NBA from Yal Sam political science from Brown University. He

0:04:06.560 --> 0:04:11.880
<v Speaker 1>is an all around IVY leaguer and one of the

0:04:11.920 --> 0:04:15.920
<v Speaker 1>smartest people that I follow on TikTok, who puts out

0:04:15.960 --> 0:04:17.920
<v Speaker 1>some of the most thoughtful videos. So if you're not

0:04:18.080 --> 0:04:22.440
<v Speaker 1>following him on TikTok, you should cavan. Happy New Year

0:04:23.240 --> 0:04:26.480
<v Speaker 1>to you, Happy New Year. Agreed to be here, Happy

0:04:26.520 --> 0:04:32.640
<v Speaker 1>New Year, Same Republican bullshit. So I want to start

0:04:32.680 --> 0:04:38.800
<v Speaker 1>off with, you know, essentially getting your thoughts on how

0:04:39.160 --> 0:04:43.120
<v Speaker 1>you believe if you think I'll say this, if you

0:04:43.200 --> 0:04:46.760
<v Speaker 1>think that the first couple of weeks of this new

0:04:46.839 --> 0:04:51.640
<v Speaker 1>year are in how Republicans antics on the House floor

0:04:52.200 --> 0:04:55.640
<v Speaker 1>their decision to want to gut the Ethics Committee and

0:04:55.760 --> 0:05:00.240
<v Speaker 1>create what HACKEM. Jeffries, minority leader has referred to the

0:05:00.320 --> 0:05:06.359
<v Speaker 1>Insurrection Protection Committee in its stead. What do you make

0:05:06.640 --> 0:05:10.600
<v Speaker 1>of how Republicans are setting the tone for the next

0:05:10.600 --> 0:05:14.440
<v Speaker 1>two years. You know, I think they're really failing to

0:05:14.480 --> 0:05:18.240
<v Speaker 1>set a clear tone and unfortunately, I mean well fortunately

0:05:18.279 --> 0:05:21.640
<v Speaker 1>for the country. But we've seen, you know, just total

0:05:21.760 --> 0:05:26.160
<v Speaker 1>chaos under McCarthy short tenure so far. Let's see how

0:05:26.160 --> 0:05:28.880
<v Speaker 1>long it lasts. But I think he's gotten so many narratives,

0:05:29.160 --> 0:05:32.200
<v Speaker 1>especially the George Santo's narrative, that have really sort of

0:05:32.200 --> 0:05:34.640
<v Speaker 1>taken away the opportunity to set a clear agenda and

0:05:34.720 --> 0:05:36.839
<v Speaker 1>define what they want to do. At the same time,

0:05:36.880 --> 0:05:38.960
<v Speaker 1>it's a little bit of letting them off the hook

0:05:38.960 --> 0:05:42.800
<v Speaker 1>because I doubt they have a real credible agenda and

0:05:42.839 --> 0:05:45.440
<v Speaker 1>so it's very hard to permeate that. And I think

0:05:45.440 --> 0:05:49.400
<v Speaker 1>it's a good time actually for Democrats obviously on messaging,

0:05:49.520 --> 0:05:52.800
<v Speaker 1>because we would rather have won the House. But it's easier,

0:05:52.839 --> 0:05:55.919
<v Speaker 1>I think, when you're in the minority to constantly be

0:05:56.200 --> 0:05:59.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, criticizing and holding those who do have control accountable.

0:06:00.400 --> 0:06:02.680
<v Speaker 1>And there's going to be a lot to say about

0:06:02.680 --> 0:06:05.400
<v Speaker 1>this really corrupt regime that is in power in Congress.

0:06:05.480 --> 0:06:08.480
<v Speaker 1>Right now. Let's talk about George Santos for a minute.

0:06:08.560 --> 0:06:11.799
<v Speaker 1>So glad you brought him up, because it's like every

0:06:11.839 --> 0:06:15.680
<v Speaker 1>single day there is another unearthing of another lie that

0:06:15.720 --> 0:06:20.400
<v Speaker 1>this man has told. And you know, I'm from Long Island,

0:06:20.440 --> 0:06:23.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm from Eastern Long Island. So from Suffolk County, and

0:06:23.360 --> 0:06:28.120
<v Speaker 1>he represents parts of Nassau County, and the New York

0:06:28.240 --> 0:06:32.560
<v Speaker 1>Republicans have called for him to step down. They say

0:06:32.600 --> 0:06:35.680
<v Speaker 1>that he is an absolute distraction, that he does not

0:06:35.839 --> 0:06:39.120
<v Speaker 1>have the capability to be able to do the job right.

0:06:40.720 --> 0:06:46.360
<v Speaker 1>You have reporters hounding him this week and his response saying,

0:06:46.520 --> 0:06:49.680
<v Speaker 1>the constituents put me here, and I won't leave unless

0:06:49.680 --> 0:06:53.000
<v Speaker 1>I have one hundred and forty two random people tell

0:06:53.040 --> 0:06:57.960
<v Speaker 1>me that life totally archery. Yeah right, And I was like,

0:06:57.640 --> 0:07:00.640
<v Speaker 1>I got you know, I got one it as well

0:07:01.000 --> 0:07:03.400
<v Speaker 1>on jan and forty two people telling him to step down.

0:07:03.960 --> 0:07:09.120
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk about basically who George Santos is

0:07:09.640 --> 0:07:14.360
<v Speaker 1>and how Kevin McCarthy as speaker, because he's so desperate

0:07:14.400 --> 0:07:20.640
<v Speaker 1>for votes, refuses to acknowledge that this man is just

0:07:20.880 --> 0:07:25.480
<v Speaker 1>corrupt and a grift. Absolutely, and I think, honestly we're

0:07:25.480 --> 0:07:27.960
<v Speaker 1>going to find out soon enough, but probably guilty of

0:07:28.120 --> 0:07:31.360
<v Speaker 1>at least one or more crimes. And I think it's

0:07:31.360 --> 0:07:34.600
<v Speaker 1>a very unique and great challenge for McCarthy to have

0:07:34.640 --> 0:07:38.400
<v Speaker 1>to deal with because it really calls out that yes,

0:07:38.440 --> 0:07:40.800
<v Speaker 1>he's an extreme example, and yes they needed the votes,

0:07:40.840 --> 0:07:43.520
<v Speaker 1>but I think there's another reason that McCarthy and others

0:07:43.560 --> 0:07:46.520
<v Speaker 1>in GOOP leadership aren't going after him, it's because where

0:07:46.520 --> 0:07:48.120
<v Speaker 1>do you draw the line. I mean, this is a

0:07:48.160 --> 0:07:52.080
<v Speaker 1>caucus full of liars and sort of close to criminals,

0:07:52.080 --> 0:07:54.920
<v Speaker 1>if not criminals. So you know, I think it's hard

0:07:54.920 --> 0:07:57.480
<v Speaker 1>for them to come out and criticize somebody, even such

0:07:57.480 --> 0:08:00.200
<v Speaker 1>an egregious case, because then the next one and the

0:08:00.240 --> 0:08:02.880
<v Speaker 1>next one, and gates and right, like, we're right, you

0:08:03.000 --> 0:08:05.680
<v Speaker 1>draw once you've opened the doors to all these sort

0:08:05.720 --> 0:08:09.040
<v Speaker 1>of bad actors to be leaders in making our laws. Now,

0:08:09.040 --> 0:08:12.080
<v Speaker 1>I think it is a total crock to say that

0:08:12.080 --> 0:08:14.080
<v Speaker 1>this guy was elected and he's going to serve and

0:08:14.080 --> 0:08:16.760
<v Speaker 1>blah blah blah. This is not who voters elected. Voters

0:08:16.760 --> 0:08:20.680
<v Speaker 1>elected a complete lie, a mythical individual. Nobody voted for

0:08:20.960 --> 0:08:23.800
<v Speaker 1>George Santos or whatever his name is. So I don't

0:08:23.840 --> 0:08:27.600
<v Speaker 1>think that that is a reasonable, you know, response. It's ludicrous,

0:08:27.680 --> 0:08:29.520
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't make any sense. I think it kind of

0:08:29.520 --> 0:08:32.600
<v Speaker 1>worked better on some of the more chaotic figures like

0:08:32.640 --> 0:08:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Marjorie Taylor Green, where yeah, like I guess she was

0:08:35.120 --> 0:08:38.640
<v Speaker 1>elected by you know, the constituents in her district, and

0:08:38.679 --> 0:08:41.920
<v Speaker 1>that's who she is. She is crazy, but it's it's

0:08:41.920 --> 0:08:45.080
<v Speaker 1>a very different case. Yeah, And I think that that's right.

0:08:45.160 --> 0:08:47.160
<v Speaker 1>I think you make a good distinction, which is that

0:08:47.559 --> 0:08:52.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, and remember, there were calls to take Marjorie

0:08:52.760 --> 0:08:56.079
<v Speaker 1>Taylor Green out of the off of the ballot in

0:08:56.160 --> 0:09:00.160
<v Speaker 1>her district. There were calls and they lost, right she

0:09:00.200 --> 0:09:02.640
<v Speaker 1>obviously she stayed on the ballot, she was able to run.

0:09:02.640 --> 0:09:07.320
<v Speaker 1>And so these people knowingly are electing a QAnon conspiracist liar,

0:09:07.480 --> 0:09:10.920
<v Speaker 1>right like, somebody who lies about reality, because that's not

0:09:10.920 --> 0:09:14.520
<v Speaker 1>where she's operating. I think that George Santos, to your point,

0:09:14.960 --> 0:09:18.360
<v Speaker 1>is a completely different case because his constituents have no

0:09:18.440 --> 0:09:21.600
<v Speaker 1>idea who they voted for, right like at all. You know.

0:09:21.640 --> 0:09:23.680
<v Speaker 1>One of the questions that I have, you know, as

0:09:23.679 --> 0:09:29.040
<v Speaker 1>somebody who is so studied in our political landscape and

0:09:29.120 --> 0:09:33.000
<v Speaker 1>climate and government, is this where do you think that

0:09:33.320 --> 0:09:37.720
<v Speaker 1>where was the breakdown in oppositional research from his opponent

0:09:37.840 --> 0:09:42.160
<v Speaker 1>and just Democrats in general, like every seat mattered, and

0:09:42.200 --> 0:09:44.679
<v Speaker 1>what was what has been said was, oh, well, this

0:09:44.800 --> 0:09:48.320
<v Speaker 1>wasn't a high profile you know, k Like, this wasn't

0:09:48.360 --> 0:09:51.040
<v Speaker 1>a high profile election. It wasn't a high profile seat.

0:09:51.200 --> 0:09:54.880
<v Speaker 1>And I'm like, but in such a narrow win that

0:09:54.960 --> 0:09:57.920
<v Speaker 1>Republicans had every seat did matter. So where was the

0:09:57.960 --> 0:10:01.760
<v Speaker 1>breakdown in research here? Right? No? I mean I think

0:10:02.200 --> 0:10:06.000
<v Speaker 1>there was some democratic opa research here, but and a

0:10:06.040 --> 0:10:08.959
<v Speaker 1>little little bit of local news coverage. Actually, once people

0:10:09.120 --> 0:10:11.480
<v Speaker 1>part of the story, they looked back and saw, oh yeah,

0:10:11.559 --> 0:10:13.559
<v Speaker 1>some people did sort of mention this. But I think

0:10:13.600 --> 0:10:15.760
<v Speaker 1>it really speaks to and it's an indictment of our

0:10:15.920 --> 0:10:19.840
<v Speaker 1>national media framework once again, where certain like how is

0:10:19.880 --> 0:10:23.000
<v Speaker 1>this this is a critically important story and but four

0:10:23.320 --> 0:10:25.960
<v Speaker 1>three or four weeks of time could have totally changed

0:10:26.000 --> 0:10:31.679
<v Speaker 1>the results yea, the power of Congress really, and somehow

0:10:31.679 --> 0:10:33.400
<v Speaker 1>it was missed. But you know, we got the New

0:10:33.440 --> 0:10:36.000
<v Speaker 1>York Times today giving Kelly and Conway a platform to

0:10:36.040 --> 0:10:38.480
<v Speaker 1>plug Trump, Like is that really what the New York

0:10:38.480 --> 0:10:41.480
<v Speaker 1>Times should be doing? Yet they missed this story. And

0:10:41.520 --> 0:10:43.960
<v Speaker 1>so I do think, you know, there's this competition at

0:10:43.960 --> 0:10:46.320
<v Speaker 1>the local level and national level in media, and we

0:10:46.480 --> 0:10:48.600
<v Speaker 1>are seeing sort of and continue to see. Really this

0:10:48.679 --> 0:10:52.920
<v Speaker 1>is a decades long problem, the decimation of local news yea,

0:10:53.000 --> 0:10:57.200
<v Speaker 1>and very much competition from national players. But then they

0:10:57.280 --> 0:10:59.720
<v Speaker 1>dropped the ball on stories like this, Like I don't

0:10:59.760 --> 0:11:02.520
<v Speaker 1>think could possibly argue this was not under the purview

0:11:02.520 --> 0:11:07.600
<v Speaker 1>of the New York Times to cover. Do you think

0:11:07.640 --> 0:11:11.120
<v Speaker 1>that Santos last the year? Do you think, you know,

0:11:11.200 --> 0:11:14.080
<v Speaker 1>just just in your prediction, in your like shaking of

0:11:14.080 --> 0:11:17.000
<v Speaker 1>the crystal ball, do you think that he makes it

0:11:17.040 --> 0:11:20.440
<v Speaker 1>through even one year of his two year term? Or

0:11:20.480 --> 0:11:23.920
<v Speaker 1>do we see indictments? I mean, he's being investigated by

0:11:23.960 --> 0:11:29.280
<v Speaker 1>both the New York the Nassau County DAH and the

0:11:29.320 --> 0:11:33.960
<v Speaker 1>federal government. Totally. I mean, I think it's laughable because

0:11:34.040 --> 0:11:36.480
<v Speaker 1>another response of McCarthy was sort of, oh, if he

0:11:36.520 --> 0:11:38.920
<v Speaker 1>did anything wrong, he'll face ethics. But as you pointed

0:11:38.920 --> 0:11:43.840
<v Speaker 1>out when we opened the ethics, he's in Congress, so

0:11:43.880 --> 0:11:47.480
<v Speaker 1>that's that's comical. But um, I think, yes, I don't

0:11:47.480 --> 0:11:49.840
<v Speaker 1>see him lasting the year if there are indictments that

0:11:49.880 --> 0:11:52.120
<v Speaker 1>come down at the same time. And I think we're

0:11:52.120 --> 0:11:54.320
<v Speaker 1>all a little tired of this, but we've seen how

0:11:54.440 --> 0:11:58.040
<v Speaker 1>long this process of investigations can be, so I really

0:11:58.040 --> 0:12:00.199
<v Speaker 1>think it's going to be tied to that. And once

0:12:00.200 --> 0:12:03.720
<v Speaker 1>there are criminal charges or more, um, you know, it'll

0:12:03.720 --> 0:12:05.640
<v Speaker 1>be a different story and a harder to defend and

0:12:05.679 --> 0:12:09.199
<v Speaker 1>maybe a little easier for some Republicans who are uncomfortable

0:12:09.240 --> 0:12:12.880
<v Speaker 1>with what's going on to speak out. But you know,

0:12:13.679 --> 0:12:19.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm not too hopeful that course correction here, Yeah, I'm

0:12:19.200 --> 0:12:21.480
<v Speaker 1>not too hopeful either. I mean, I won't hold my

0:12:21.480 --> 0:12:23.280
<v Speaker 1>breath because I don't want to pass out. But um,

0:12:23.800 --> 0:12:26.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, one of the things that I think is,

0:12:26.600 --> 0:12:29.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, was really eye opening. I'll say this, for

0:12:30.120 --> 0:12:34.840
<v Speaker 1>the fourteen failed votes that McCarthy had for speaker took.

0:12:36.080 --> 0:12:39.800
<v Speaker 1>It took four days and fifteen votes for McCarthy to

0:12:40.040 --> 0:12:44.199
<v Speaker 1>have this hollowed out speakership. Can you speak to some

0:12:44.240 --> 0:12:48.080
<v Speaker 1>of the concessions that were made and why he is

0:12:48.240 --> 0:12:54.040
<v Speaker 1>now considered one of the weakest speakers in history. Well, exactly,

0:12:54.040 --> 0:12:55.720
<v Speaker 1>That's what I was going to say, is he's basically

0:12:55.800 --> 0:12:59.400
<v Speaker 1>speaker in name only, and the concessions, as I think

0:12:59.480 --> 0:13:03.480
<v Speaker 1>everyone's predicted for years seeing this slow moving train wreck

0:13:03.600 --> 0:13:07.040
<v Speaker 1>of the GOP Congress, is that they basically cowt out

0:13:07.080 --> 0:13:12.200
<v Speaker 1>to every demand of the most extremist members of their caucus,

0:13:12.360 --> 0:13:15.480
<v Speaker 1>and those people are have every incentive to continue to

0:13:15.520 --> 0:13:19.480
<v Speaker 1>create chaos at every turn. It's paid off for them, unfortunately,

0:13:20.040 --> 0:13:21.360
<v Speaker 1>and I think we're going to see more and more

0:13:21.400 --> 0:13:26.520
<v Speaker 1>of it. And I think what was particularly alarming about

0:13:26.559 --> 0:13:29.440
<v Speaker 1>the fifteen votes. Is I think if you a decade

0:13:29.440 --> 0:13:32.240
<v Speaker 1>ago said oh, this like sort of technical things happening

0:13:32.240 --> 0:13:34.600
<v Speaker 1>in Congress and they're going to go through multiple rounds

0:13:34.800 --> 0:13:36.439
<v Speaker 1>or a bunch of days, and it's going to go

0:13:36.480 --> 0:13:39.680
<v Speaker 1>into the weekend, nobody on Earth would be really caring

0:13:39.800 --> 0:13:44.640
<v Speaker 1>or watching that much. And suddenly you had everyone watching, right.

0:13:44.679 --> 0:13:48.640
<v Speaker 1>And my concern with that is that there is almost

0:13:48.640 --> 0:13:53.040
<v Speaker 1>this reality TV payout where you know, good attention intention

0:13:53.679 --> 0:13:57.560
<v Speaker 1>It allowed those people to kind of totally own the

0:13:57.720 --> 0:14:02.000
<v Speaker 1>narratives and the media and write like, who knows fake conversations,

0:14:02.040 --> 0:14:05.319
<v Speaker 1>have real conversations, but kind of play to a public audience.

0:14:05.360 --> 0:14:07.439
<v Speaker 1>And we saw this little from Democrats too with Katie

0:14:07.440 --> 0:14:10.040
<v Speaker 1>Porter and her book, but you know, it's just a

0:14:10.080 --> 0:14:12.640
<v Speaker 1>totally different level. And I do think the incentives are off.

0:14:12.679 --> 0:14:15.240
<v Speaker 1>And what was really interesting is obviously the c SPAN

0:14:15.320 --> 0:14:18.240
<v Speaker 1>cameras kind of had a little bit more control of

0:14:18.240 --> 0:14:20.720
<v Speaker 1>what they wanted to do. And I came across a

0:14:20.760 --> 0:14:22.920
<v Speaker 1>piece and I'm blanking on the author, so forgive me,

0:14:23.240 --> 0:14:26.800
<v Speaker 1>but basically saying, yeah, actually, this is terrible because we

0:14:26.920 --> 0:14:29.680
<v Speaker 1>don't want this sort of false sense of like, oh

0:14:29.720 --> 0:14:31.480
<v Speaker 1>now the cameras can do whatever they want, and there's

0:14:31.480 --> 0:14:34.880
<v Speaker 1>more accountability when it's really just feeding into again that

0:14:35.080 --> 0:14:39.520
<v Speaker 1>national media ecosystem that's really trying to create reality TV moments,

0:14:39.680 --> 0:14:43.360
<v Speaker 1>and that's not really accountability. It's really giving attention seekers

0:14:43.600 --> 0:14:46.760
<v Speaker 1>a channel to seek that attention and have an impact

0:14:46.840 --> 0:14:49.480
<v Speaker 1>in a really bad way. You know, I'm so glad

0:14:49.520 --> 0:14:52.440
<v Speaker 1>that you brought up the cameras because I was going

0:14:52.520 --> 0:14:56.040
<v Speaker 1>to be remiss in not asking you your thoughts on

0:14:56.640 --> 0:15:01.840
<v Speaker 1>that physical altercation that we saw on the house of

0:15:01.920 --> 0:15:04.720
<v Speaker 1>the floor at the floor of the house. Never in

0:15:04.760 --> 0:15:07.960
<v Speaker 1>my life, right, never in my life have I seen

0:15:08.600 --> 0:15:11.440
<v Speaker 1>in American politics. Now we've seen this play out. We've

0:15:11.480 --> 0:15:13.600
<v Speaker 1>seen a playout in Parliament. We've seen a play out

0:15:13.600 --> 0:15:17.120
<v Speaker 1>in other countries where they literally have gone fisticuffs. We've

0:15:17.200 --> 0:15:20.880
<v Speaker 1>never seen this in America. Haive on, what was your

0:15:20.960 --> 0:15:26.200
<v Speaker 1>reaction to that, to that clip and to I mean,

0:15:26.360 --> 0:15:33.320
<v Speaker 1>I my mouth felt. I was stunned. It was honestly,

0:15:33.360 --> 0:15:35.240
<v Speaker 1>it did remind me and I might be getting this wrong,

0:15:35.280 --> 0:15:38.320
<v Speaker 1>so forgive me my APUs history teacher, but I think

0:15:38.360 --> 0:15:41.600
<v Speaker 1>there was like one example of some guy, like very

0:15:41.600 --> 0:15:44.360
<v Speaker 1>early on, beating somebody else with a cane like either

0:15:44.480 --> 0:15:46.320
<v Speaker 1>in the house or the Senate. So I have to

0:15:46.320 --> 0:15:49.040
<v Speaker 1>look that up after this, but I'm sure, but it

0:15:49.040 --> 0:15:51.120
<v Speaker 1>really reminded me of that, and I was like, yeah,

0:15:51.160 --> 0:15:54.000
<v Speaker 1>to your point, like we have not seen this in forever,

0:15:54.240 --> 0:15:56.680
<v Speaker 1>but this really is who the Republican Party is. I mean,

0:15:56.720 --> 0:16:00.440
<v Speaker 1>this is a pro violence, pro insurrection party. These are

0:16:00.440 --> 0:16:02.960
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of frat guys that you know ended up

0:16:02.960 --> 0:16:06.080
<v Speaker 1>in Congress. Let's be honest about that. I mean they

0:16:06.120 --> 0:16:10.240
<v Speaker 1>have no policy positions and they're not very thoughtful now

0:16:10.360 --> 0:16:13.960
<v Speaker 1>care about their constituents. All they care about is you know,

0:16:14.440 --> 0:16:17.520
<v Speaker 1>straight rich white guys and how they can protect that

0:16:17.560 --> 0:16:20.280
<v Speaker 1>group of people and you know, hold onto powers. So

0:16:20.560 --> 0:16:24.280
<v Speaker 1>of course you see this sort of ludicrous behavior. I

0:16:24.320 --> 0:16:26.960
<v Speaker 1>mean it was just such you know, and I've said

0:16:26.960 --> 0:16:29.520
<v Speaker 1>this so many times on this show, and obviously, like

0:16:29.840 --> 0:16:34.240
<v Speaker 1>you also went into politics. There was such an esteem

0:16:34.480 --> 0:16:36.800
<v Speaker 1>that I held when I worked on Capitol Hill, like

0:16:36.920 --> 0:16:39.040
<v Speaker 1>I would see these members, it was it was it

0:16:39.080 --> 0:16:41.240
<v Speaker 1>was a kin. I would tell people if you were

0:16:41.280 --> 0:16:44.560
<v Speaker 1>in Hollywood and you're seeing like the directors that you

0:16:44.640 --> 0:16:46.840
<v Speaker 1>love and the writers that you love, like walking the

0:16:46.880 --> 0:16:49.640
<v Speaker 1>halls and the actors and the actresses, there was this

0:16:49.800 --> 0:16:52.760
<v Speaker 1>air of like, oh, my goodness, I'm walking the halls

0:16:52.760 --> 0:16:56.800
<v Speaker 1>of history and to watch it devolve into like you're

0:16:56.880 --> 0:17:02.280
<v Speaker 1>into a frat house, into just like this, this horrible, tacky,

0:17:02.840 --> 0:17:08.320
<v Speaker 1>trashy behavior. I just it's it has brought the air

0:17:08.480 --> 0:17:13.320
<v Speaker 1>and the esteem and any bit of regalness that our

0:17:13.359 --> 0:17:16.520
<v Speaker 1>government had is now just in the sewer. And I

0:17:16.520 --> 0:17:20.960
<v Speaker 1>don't think that folks recognize how that damage will affect

0:17:21.040 --> 0:17:25.840
<v Speaker 1>us for decades to come, what that has done to

0:17:25.840 --> 0:17:29.840
<v Speaker 1>to our faith right in these systems and in these people.

0:17:31.760 --> 0:17:34.439
<v Speaker 1>And I mean, like, who is going to have the

0:17:34.560 --> 0:17:39.320
<v Speaker 1>institutional knowledge to put things back together? Because to your point,

0:17:39.600 --> 0:17:42.359
<v Speaker 1>I don't think anyone or most people that want to

0:17:42.400 --> 0:17:44.680
<v Speaker 1>do good work and want to contribute to our democracy

0:17:44.760 --> 0:17:47.280
<v Speaker 1>see that it's a viable path to do so. So

0:17:47.520 --> 0:17:49.600
<v Speaker 1>they're not going to go there. Um so where are

0:17:49.600 --> 0:17:51.320
<v Speaker 1>they going to go? Probably to the private sector or

0:17:51.359 --> 0:17:53.679
<v Speaker 1>something like that. I meanwhile, you'll have sort of the

0:17:53.720 --> 0:17:57.000
<v Speaker 1>worst group of people doing these things and staffing up

0:17:57.040 --> 0:18:00.280
<v Speaker 1>these offices, and those will be the people around until

0:18:00.320 --> 0:18:03.800
<v Speaker 1>something major changes. Yeah. It just it really, you know,

0:18:04.080 --> 0:18:06.760
<v Speaker 1>aside from the side show and the circus and we

0:18:06.880 --> 0:18:09.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of laugh so that we don't cry, It is

0:18:09.359 --> 0:18:12.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of heartbreaking, right for those of us who really

0:18:12.320 --> 0:18:16.639
<v Speaker 1>believe in public service, who really believe in the ability

0:18:16.640 --> 0:18:20.840
<v Speaker 1>of government to better the lives of everyday Americans, and

0:18:20.880 --> 0:18:24.520
<v Speaker 1>then to watch it turn into a trashy reality TV

0:18:24.720 --> 0:18:29.199
<v Speaker 1>side show is really it is heartbreaking. I don't I

0:18:29.200 --> 0:18:31.399
<v Speaker 1>don't know what else to say about it. As you

0:18:31.880 --> 0:18:36.000
<v Speaker 1>as we watched, um, you know, finally Kevin McCarthy take

0:18:36.040 --> 0:18:40.080
<v Speaker 1>the speakership after fourteen failed votes. We watch him give

0:18:40.200 --> 0:18:44.639
<v Speaker 1>his speech, which was just breathless in its inability to

0:18:44.680 --> 0:18:49.320
<v Speaker 1>read the room. Then we, in contrast, watch Hakeem Jeffries.

0:18:50.119 --> 0:18:54.280
<v Speaker 1>I want to get your your response in thoughts to

0:18:54.520 --> 0:18:59.359
<v Speaker 1>Hakeem's jeff Jakeem Jeffreys ABC's of Democracy. I love that.

0:18:59.560 --> 0:19:01.639
<v Speaker 1>I love that. I actually thought it was so clever.

0:19:01.800 --> 0:19:04.199
<v Speaker 1>At first, it was like, is it a little corny?

0:19:04.280 --> 0:19:06.920
<v Speaker 1>And it is a little corny, honest, but it doesn't matter,

0:19:07.119 --> 0:19:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Like it was so wholesome. But it was actually so

0:19:09.960 --> 0:19:13.600
<v Speaker 1>on the mark too, Like it came in a package

0:19:13.680 --> 0:19:16.879
<v Speaker 1>that was very presentable and sort of unassuming, but if

0:19:16.920 --> 0:19:20.160
<v Speaker 1>you look at the words used and the comparisons drawn,

0:19:20.320 --> 0:19:22.639
<v Speaker 1>it was so clever and it was an easy thing.

0:19:22.720 --> 0:19:25.200
<v Speaker 1>By the way, obviously we were talking about TikTok. You know,

0:19:25.400 --> 0:19:27.359
<v Speaker 1>it was an easy thing for people to clip and share,

0:19:27.440 --> 0:19:30.919
<v Speaker 1>so that was genius too. So it was a great device,

0:19:31.000 --> 0:19:34.399
<v Speaker 1>I think, and it really introduced him in a tone

0:19:34.800 --> 0:19:39.199
<v Speaker 1>that is going to allow I think McCarthy to make

0:19:39.280 --> 0:19:42.879
<v Speaker 1>the biggest fool of himself because he wasn't going out right.

0:19:43.119 --> 0:19:47.159
<v Speaker 1>He didn't come with, you know, too much harshness or

0:19:47.320 --> 0:19:49.840
<v Speaker 1>like energy to start with. I think we'll probably see

0:19:49.840 --> 0:19:51.800
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more of that as things get more

0:19:51.800 --> 0:19:55.680
<v Speaker 1>and more sort of aggressive with this new Congress. But

0:19:56.080 --> 0:19:59.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, it kind of was a totally open, neutral,

0:19:59.440 --> 0:20:02.159
<v Speaker 1>like yes, going to call out facts and be president

0:20:02.200 --> 0:20:04.280
<v Speaker 1>in this reality. At the same time, you know, I

0:20:04.359 --> 0:20:07.800
<v Speaker 1>think he said, you know, like let's disagree without being disagreeable.

0:20:08.240 --> 0:20:10.639
<v Speaker 1>It's not my personal favorite mantra, but I would think

0:20:10.720 --> 0:20:14.280
<v Speaker 1>it serves in some cases, like perhaps this case on

0:20:14.440 --> 0:20:20.120
<v Speaker 1>his first speech sort of on a supernational stage. How

0:20:20.160 --> 0:20:25.120
<v Speaker 1>do you think that How came Jeffreys as minority leader

0:20:25.200 --> 0:20:28.800
<v Speaker 1>and this new leadership team are going to be able

0:20:28.920 --> 0:20:34.120
<v Speaker 1>to take on um these kind of weaponized, violent, volatile

0:20:34.560 --> 0:20:39.320
<v Speaker 1>Republicans in the House. How do you see this, this team,

0:20:39.480 --> 0:20:45.560
<v Speaker 1>this group playing out differently than Pelosi did for you know,

0:20:45.640 --> 0:20:48.920
<v Speaker 1>for for for over a decade. Well, I think it

0:20:49.000 --> 0:20:51.480
<v Speaker 1>ties back to one of your earlier questions today, which is,

0:20:52.040 --> 0:20:55.000
<v Speaker 1>now Democrats have this moment. Right under Pelosi's leadership, they

0:20:55.000 --> 0:20:57.520
<v Speaker 1>were actually racing against the clock to get as much

0:20:57.640 --> 0:20:59.600
<v Speaker 1>done as humanly possible, and they did a lot. They

0:20:59.640 --> 0:21:02.880
<v Speaker 1>did alish a massive amount. I think everyone is impressed

0:21:02.880 --> 0:21:05.639
<v Speaker 1>with Biden's sort of first term on that aspect, and

0:21:06.000 --> 0:21:08.320
<v Speaker 1>he obviously owes a lot of credit to Pelosi for that.

0:21:09.440 --> 0:21:12.040
<v Speaker 1>Now they're in the position of really getting to lean

0:21:12.119 --> 0:21:15.760
<v Speaker 1>into narrative and communication and story because it is going

0:21:15.800 --> 0:21:18.680
<v Speaker 1>to be harder for Democrats to push things through Congress.

0:21:19.600 --> 0:21:23.160
<v Speaker 1>But there's that opportunity then to show the country how

0:21:23.280 --> 0:21:26.359
<v Speaker 1>diverse and awesome the people that we've elected to the

0:21:26.440 --> 0:21:29.879
<v Speaker 1>party are, and to really call out the bad behaviors

0:21:30.359 --> 0:21:33.000
<v Speaker 1>and maybe in a more sort of strident way, because again,

0:21:33.280 --> 0:21:35.560
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the day, it's not realistic that

0:21:36.119 --> 0:21:38.720
<v Speaker 1>too much is going to come through on consensus. So

0:21:38.800 --> 0:21:40.600
<v Speaker 1>we'll see. I mean, maybe that won't be the case,

0:21:40.640 --> 0:21:42.600
<v Speaker 1>but I highly expect it to be sort of a

0:21:42.680 --> 0:21:46.680
<v Speaker 1>standstill with in terms of bi partisanship and so it

0:21:46.840 --> 0:21:49.879
<v Speaker 1>kind of gives you this chance where you're basically getting

0:21:49.960 --> 0:21:54.520
<v Speaker 1>to and it's not a nice phrasing maybe, but to perform,

0:21:54.640 --> 0:21:56.200
<v Speaker 1>right like, they're going to get to perform now for

0:21:56.280 --> 0:21:59.480
<v Speaker 1>the next two years and create the best show possible.

0:21:59.560 --> 0:22:02.640
<v Speaker 1>And do you know, hopefully what frankly, Republicans are pretty

0:22:02.680 --> 0:22:05.120
<v Speaker 1>successful at, which is getting that intention and getting those

0:22:06.000 --> 0:22:08.880
<v Speaker 1>narratives out there. Now, Democrats are in a position where

0:22:08.880 --> 0:22:11.200
<v Speaker 1>they can kind of keep you know, poking the bear

0:22:11.280 --> 0:22:14.040
<v Speaker 1>and seeing what they can you know, drive attention around,

0:22:14.080 --> 0:22:16.320
<v Speaker 1>and I think that will be successful, especially you know,

0:22:16.400 --> 0:22:19.480
<v Speaker 1>I think people are concerned if you ask, you know, who,

0:22:19.600 --> 0:22:21.760
<v Speaker 1>if not Biden would run in twenty twenty four, which

0:22:21.760 --> 0:22:24.159
<v Speaker 1>I don't really honestly think is a productive question, but

0:22:24.600 --> 0:22:26.680
<v Speaker 1>they reflect on sort of is there a deep bench

0:22:26.720 --> 0:22:29.720
<v Speaker 1>for Democrats? And I think absolutely, especially from some of

0:22:29.720 --> 0:22:31.600
<v Speaker 1>the governors we're seeing. But we're also going to be

0:22:31.640 --> 0:22:33.440
<v Speaker 1>able to see over the next two years hopefully if

0:22:33.480 --> 0:22:36.680
<v Speaker 1>done well, you know, emphasis on some great members of

0:22:36.720 --> 0:22:38.600
<v Speaker 1>Congress that we have to offer who can be future

0:22:38.720 --> 0:22:40.320
<v Speaker 1>leaders of the party. So I think now is a

0:22:40.440 --> 0:22:43.879
<v Speaker 1>real time to focus on connecting with the American people.

0:22:45.080 --> 0:22:49.240
<v Speaker 1>Last question for you is this you know, I think

0:22:49.280 --> 0:22:52.720
<v Speaker 1>that a lot of Americans. I think the midterm election

0:22:52.880 --> 0:22:58.479
<v Speaker 1>showed that more Americans care about preserving our democracy than

0:22:58.560 --> 0:23:01.280
<v Speaker 1>the mainstream media gave them credit for. They kept saying,

0:23:01.440 --> 0:23:03.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, these are not the issues, it's the kitchen

0:23:03.440 --> 0:23:06.120
<v Speaker 1>table issues. And I kept saying, well, if you don't

0:23:06.160 --> 0:23:08.560
<v Speaker 1>have a democracy, you don't have a kitchen table. So

0:23:08.680 --> 0:23:11.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm confused about the other things that would be taking

0:23:11.920 --> 0:23:17.080
<v Speaker 1>your attention. But you know, as we continue to look ahead,

0:23:17.240 --> 0:23:19.240
<v Speaker 1>this year is kind of the march to the real

0:23:19.359 --> 0:23:22.919
<v Speaker 1>beginning of the presidential cycle. As you have lifted up,

0:23:24.160 --> 0:23:28.560
<v Speaker 1>what do you think about Americans attention and stamina as

0:23:28.680 --> 0:23:33.440
<v Speaker 1>we head into the presidential And you know, do you

0:23:33.720 --> 0:23:37.520
<v Speaker 1>think what, if anything, can Democrats do? You were talking

0:23:37.560 --> 0:23:43.840
<v Speaker 1>about messaging and narrative to ensure Americans that Democrats are

0:23:43.840 --> 0:23:46.320
<v Speaker 1>the ones that need to remain to be in charge

0:23:47.720 --> 0:23:53.240
<v Speaker 1>and remain in charge in order to get the job done. Yeah, well,

0:23:53.359 --> 0:23:55.520
<v Speaker 1>I actually think it is sometimes helpful when you're not

0:23:55.680 --> 0:23:57.760
<v Speaker 1>in power. It's easier to make that case because it's

0:23:57.800 --> 0:24:00.600
<v Speaker 1>always easier to criticize than to do. And again with

0:24:00.680 --> 0:24:04.280
<v Speaker 1>the caveat that Republicans don't really want to do anything productive.

0:24:04.640 --> 0:24:09.600
<v Speaker 1>But I think that I appreciate Biden continuing to speak

0:24:09.640 --> 0:24:12.080
<v Speaker 1>out about the decline of democracy because I think sometimes

0:24:12.080 --> 0:24:13.840
<v Speaker 1>people are like, oh my god, not in another press

0:24:13.920 --> 0:24:17.560
<v Speaker 1>conference about this topic like you did on jan six.

0:24:17.640 --> 0:24:19.560
<v Speaker 1>But I thought it was great because you have to

0:24:19.680 --> 0:24:22.960
<v Speaker 1>keep reminding people that this is a long term problem

0:24:23.040 --> 0:24:25.200
<v Speaker 1>that we have. It's not just a drum problem. We

0:24:25.320 --> 0:24:27.600
<v Speaker 1>now have an entire political party in the country that's

0:24:27.640 --> 0:24:31.159
<v Speaker 1>really dedicated to destroying our democracy. And frankly, all the

0:24:31.240 --> 0:24:34.800
<v Speaker 1>institutions you mentioned, you know, media saying what matters and

0:24:34.920 --> 0:24:37.680
<v Speaker 1>what doesn't matter. I mean, media is an institution that's

0:24:37.760 --> 0:24:41.160
<v Speaker 1>incredibly complicit in the decline of our democracy. So they're

0:24:41.160 --> 0:24:44.480
<v Speaker 1>probably not the best source to go to in discussing,

0:24:44.680 --> 0:24:48.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, the importance of democratic institutions. They are supposed

0:24:48.119 --> 0:24:51.440
<v Speaker 1>to be one, and they are not fulfilling that commitment.

0:24:51.640 --> 0:24:56.320
<v Speaker 1>So I think, you know, people understand that the bottom

0:24:56.600 --> 0:25:00.159
<v Speaker 1>is close to falling out in this country. I think

0:25:00.200 --> 0:25:04.800
<v Speaker 1>people are very afraid of increased chaos, potentially civil conflict

0:25:05.560 --> 0:25:07.560
<v Speaker 1>growing more and more. I mean, even in New York

0:25:07.600 --> 0:25:12.120
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing you know, Proud Boys and what doing extremists

0:25:12.200 --> 0:25:15.920
<v Speaker 1>attack drag performers, because like Elon Musk and sort of

0:25:16.160 --> 0:25:19.560
<v Speaker 1>other powerful people have just amplified this type of hate beyond.

0:25:20.800 --> 0:25:23.480
<v Speaker 1>So I think people are incredibly nervous and they're willing

0:25:23.520 --> 0:25:25.800
<v Speaker 1>to pay attention because they really feel their lives or

0:25:25.800 --> 0:25:28.600
<v Speaker 1>at stick and they are. And then I think, second,

0:25:28.960 --> 0:25:32.520
<v Speaker 1>it would be good to communicate the timeline a little

0:25:32.600 --> 0:25:35.280
<v Speaker 1>differently to people because I think we keep focusing on

0:25:35.400 --> 0:25:39.680
<v Speaker 1>the next benchmark, the next benchmark, the next benchmark, the midterms, election, whatever,

0:25:39.760 --> 0:25:42.200
<v Speaker 1>and then there's up slightly positive outcome or we do

0:25:42.280 --> 0:25:44.080
<v Speaker 1>a little better than we thought, and people are like, oh,

0:25:45.200 --> 0:25:49.080
<v Speaker 1>not everything's better yet, right, This is going to take

0:25:49.200 --> 0:25:52.840
<v Speaker 1>a decade or two to course correct. So yeah, I

0:25:52.920 --> 0:25:55.480
<v Speaker 1>mean it's fits and starts, and I think every individual

0:25:55.640 --> 0:25:58.400
<v Speaker 1>has to look at what they can contribute and also

0:25:58.480 --> 0:26:00.400
<v Speaker 1>how they can stay in this for the law run.

0:26:00.560 --> 0:26:04.160
<v Speaker 1>So focus maybe on their you know, own personal health

0:26:04.280 --> 0:26:06.440
<v Speaker 1>and you know sanity as they do that. I know,

0:26:06.520 --> 0:26:09.560
<v Speaker 1>for people like you and me were constantly thinking about

0:26:09.600 --> 0:26:12.560
<v Speaker 1>these issues and getting every news update every second, that

0:26:12.640 --> 0:26:14.720
<v Speaker 1>can be hard sometimes, you know. I mean I wouldn't

0:26:14.760 --> 0:26:17.119
<v Speaker 1>not do it because I personally need to know if

0:26:17.160 --> 0:26:21.880
<v Speaker 1>we're going to nuclear war, Yes, that's me, I think

0:26:21.960 --> 0:26:26.359
<v Speaker 1>other people they would rather not know, frankly, so so

0:26:26.560 --> 0:26:27.879
<v Speaker 1>I think that's my take on it, and I do

0:26:28.000 --> 0:26:30.560
<v Speaker 1>think the messaging can be better, And I do think

0:26:30.800 --> 0:26:32.159
<v Speaker 1>on one piece that I don't want to sort of

0:26:32.240 --> 0:26:33.920
<v Speaker 1>kick off a whole new topic as we're rapping, but

0:26:34.440 --> 0:26:37.560
<v Speaker 1>we talked about these investigations. Obviously there's some more on

0:26:37.640 --> 0:26:40.320
<v Speaker 1>the horizon. I do think that the Department of Justice

0:26:40.400 --> 0:26:44.800
<v Speaker 1>has done a really bad job communicating with the American people,

0:26:44.840 --> 0:26:46.399
<v Speaker 1>And I think there's a lot of people that can

0:26:46.440 --> 0:26:49.960
<v Speaker 1>criticize or support what Mark Garland's doing. It's a very detailed,

0:26:50.000 --> 0:26:52.879
<v Speaker 1>specific process, so I don't think all the pundits out there,

0:26:52.960 --> 0:26:55.320
<v Speaker 1>like no matter their experience, really can speak to it.

0:26:55.640 --> 0:26:57.560
<v Speaker 1>But what we can speak to is what we've all seen,

0:26:57.680 --> 0:27:01.120
<v Speaker 1>which is frankly, I think even the strongest Biden supporters

0:27:01.240 --> 0:27:05.040
<v Speaker 1>or pro democracy people are frustrated at this point with

0:27:05.359 --> 0:27:08.000
<v Speaker 1>what's been happening at the DOJ and the lack of

0:27:08.160 --> 0:27:12.959
<v Speaker 1>clarity and communication about the process. What to expect if

0:27:13.000 --> 0:27:16.000
<v Speaker 1>you can't communicate about something, why you can't communicate it,

0:27:16.359 --> 0:27:19.040
<v Speaker 1>but just share that information so that people have that

0:27:19.160 --> 0:27:22.320
<v Speaker 1>foundational trust because you can't do all this work behind

0:27:22.359 --> 0:27:24.880
<v Speaker 1>closed doors, and then when you release the port the reports,

0:27:25.000 --> 0:27:28.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, suddenly nobody believes in the process that you've

0:27:28.600 --> 0:27:31.080
<v Speaker 1>conducted because it's taken years and there's been so much

0:27:31.160 --> 0:27:33.960
<v Speaker 1>murkiness around it. So I think that is one thing

0:27:34.160 --> 0:27:38.080
<v Speaker 1>that is so important. Yeah, and a final plus also,

0:27:38.240 --> 0:27:40.920
<v Speaker 1>I think, yeah, this example makes it relatently clear that

0:27:41.200 --> 0:27:45.000
<v Speaker 1>nobody cared about the status of Hillary Clinton's emails, none

0:27:45.000 --> 0:27:48.440
<v Speaker 1>of which remark classified, and it really was a sexist

0:27:48.520 --> 0:27:51.480
<v Speaker 1>attack under the guise of a national security issue, and

0:27:51.640 --> 0:27:55.439
<v Speaker 1>it really cost her the presidency. And it's just an

0:27:55.480 --> 0:27:58.520
<v Speaker 1>absolute disgrace. And I think the history books should absolutely

0:27:58.720 --> 0:28:01.960
<v Speaker 1>get that right. Kive on if we will have history books,

0:28:02.080 --> 0:28:04.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, that's something as well, you know, if we

0:28:04.640 --> 0:28:06.960
<v Speaker 1>if we will have them. But no, you're absolutely right

0:28:07.119 --> 0:28:10.280
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the transparency. Even if you can't, as

0:28:10.320 --> 0:28:14.119
<v Speaker 1>the Department of Justice, speak to the inner workings of

0:28:14.280 --> 0:28:18.680
<v Speaker 1>how things are unfolding, you can bring some level of

0:28:18.720 --> 0:28:21.200
<v Speaker 1>fifty thousand foot this is what we've been up to,

0:28:21.400 --> 0:28:24.120
<v Speaker 1>this is what we're doing enough for the American people,

0:28:24.160 --> 0:28:26.760
<v Speaker 1>to your point, so that when these reports do come out,

0:28:27.000 --> 0:28:30.919
<v Speaker 1>it isn't just it doesn't just fall on non listening ears,

0:28:31.160 --> 0:28:36.840
<v Speaker 1>and then people who are already concerned about transparency and

0:28:36.920 --> 0:28:40.440
<v Speaker 1>concerned about corruption then don't feel like they've been brought along.

0:28:40.560 --> 0:28:42.920
<v Speaker 1>So I think that even if it isn't the Department

0:28:42.960 --> 0:28:47.720
<v Speaker 1>of Justice themselves, it is you know, someone in the

0:28:48.000 --> 0:28:52.520
<v Speaker 1>administration being able to you know, give us the one

0:28:52.600 --> 0:28:56.000
<v Speaker 1>on one class on how the Department of Justice moves

0:28:56.360 --> 0:28:59.560
<v Speaker 1>even if it is and you know through examples from

0:28:59.600 --> 0:29:02.080
<v Speaker 1>the past, and this is how we get to these points.

0:29:02.160 --> 0:29:07.760
<v Speaker 1>But thank you friend for joining. Your first appearance this year,

0:29:07.840 --> 0:29:09.560
<v Speaker 1>and I hope it will not be your last on

0:29:09.640 --> 0:29:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Woke a F but we will definitely come back to

0:29:12.080 --> 0:29:15.560
<v Speaker 1>you to see how how things continue to shake out. Kivan,

0:29:15.680 --> 0:29:17.360
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for making the time for Thank

0:29:17.400 --> 0:29:24.600
<v Speaker 1>you so much. Always great to be back. That is

0:29:24.640 --> 0:29:27.840
<v Speaker 1>it for me, dear friends on woke f as always,

0:29:28.200 --> 0:29:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Power to the people and to all the people. Power,

0:29:31.280 --> 0:29:33.600
<v Speaker 1>get woke and stay woke as fuck.