WEBVTT - Déjà vu, Anxiety and Dreams, Part 2

0:00:03.040 --> 0:00:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind production of My

0:00:05.480 --> 0:00:14.480
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio. Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind.

0:00:14.520 --> 0:00:17.200
<v Speaker 1>My name is Robert Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick, and

0:00:17.239 --> 0:00:20.239
<v Speaker 1>we're back with part two of our talk about deja vu.

0:00:20.680 --> 0:00:22.960
<v Speaker 1>That's right, if you didn't listen to part one, go

0:00:23.000 --> 0:00:25.239
<v Speaker 1>back and listen to part one, because this is this

0:00:25.320 --> 0:00:28.319
<v Speaker 1>is definitely one of those, uh pair of episodes where

0:00:28.360 --> 0:00:31.600
<v Speaker 1>you need to experience them in order. But we we

0:00:31.680 --> 0:00:35.480
<v Speaker 1>kicked off by talking about some personal experiences with deja vu,

0:00:36.159 --> 0:00:39.840
<v Speaker 1>uh and also getting into some of the rich variety

0:00:39.960 --> 0:00:44.120
<v Speaker 1>that is to be found under the broad categorization of

0:00:44.200 --> 0:00:48.480
<v Speaker 1>deja vu experiences. In this episode, we're going to kick

0:00:48.520 --> 0:00:51.120
<v Speaker 1>off by really getting into some of the major theories

0:00:51.120 --> 0:00:55.360
<v Speaker 1>and explanations for this thing called deja vu. Right, So,

0:00:55.520 --> 0:00:59.360
<v Speaker 1>last time I cited there's a major paper on the

0:00:59.360 --> 0:01:01.640
<v Speaker 1>research on deja vu that was published in two thousand

0:01:01.760 --> 0:01:05.560
<v Speaker 1>three by a researcher named Alan S. Brown, was published

0:01:05.600 --> 0:01:08.479
<v Speaker 1>in Psychological Bulletin, and we cited it last time, talking

0:01:08.480 --> 0:01:11.880
<v Speaker 1>about a lot of the common findings about deja vu,

0:01:11.959 --> 0:01:15.039
<v Speaker 1>including the fact that it appears to be very strongly

0:01:15.080 --> 0:01:18.600
<v Speaker 1>associated with stress and fatigue. The more tired and stressed

0:01:18.600 --> 0:01:20.440
<v Speaker 1>out you are, the more likely you are to have

0:01:20.440 --> 0:01:23.880
<v Speaker 1>a deja vu experience. The studies that show it associated

0:01:23.880 --> 0:01:27.240
<v Speaker 1>with travel, people who travel are more likely to experience

0:01:27.280 --> 0:01:30.960
<v Speaker 1>deja vu. Um, the studies that show that that certain

0:01:31.040 --> 0:01:34.400
<v Speaker 1>drugs can apparently cause lots of deja vu. And then

0:01:34.520 --> 0:01:38.360
<v Speaker 1>especially the fact that deja vu appears to decrease with age,

0:01:38.480 --> 0:01:40.600
<v Speaker 1>that as you get older in life, you you on

0:01:40.720 --> 0:01:44.600
<v Speaker 1>average have fewer deja vu experiences, which I'm still finding

0:01:44.600 --> 0:01:47.560
<v Speaker 1>interesting and I'm coming back to that one a lot.

0:01:47.600 --> 0:01:50.160
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, So now we want to dive into, uh,

0:01:50.200 --> 0:01:53.120
<v Speaker 1>the major theories and explanations, and my main guide on

0:01:53.160 --> 0:01:57.160
<v Speaker 1>this is Brown's paper from two thousand three where he

0:01:57.160 --> 0:01:59.560
<v Speaker 1>he reviews most of the existing research. There's been a

0:01:59.560 --> 0:02:01.880
<v Speaker 1>few develop elements since then, and we'll talk about those

0:02:02.680 --> 0:02:06.400
<v Speaker 1>later on, but they're they're basically several. They're like four

0:02:06.440 --> 0:02:11.440
<v Speaker 1>main categories that Brown outlines about what the explanations for

0:02:11.520 --> 0:02:14.280
<v Speaker 1>deja vu could be. And the categories are going to

0:02:14.360 --> 0:02:16.520
<v Speaker 1>be the following. So first, you've got some kind of

0:02:16.680 --> 0:02:22.000
<v Speaker 1>dual processing. Second, you've got neurological dysfunction, Third, you have

0:02:22.520 --> 0:02:28.760
<v Speaker 1>memory issues, and then fourth you have attentional catch up. Um. Now,

0:02:28.800 --> 0:02:30.480
<v Speaker 1>one of the first things I think we should mention

0:02:30.600 --> 0:02:33.200
<v Speaker 1>is that it can be kind of difficult to understand

0:02:33.240 --> 0:02:36.280
<v Speaker 1>the causes of deja vu because deja vu is inherently

0:02:36.440 --> 0:02:40.280
<v Speaker 1>a little bit difficult to study. It's not super easy

0:02:40.360 --> 0:02:44.760
<v Speaker 1>to trigger episodes of deja vu in a laboratory or

0:02:44.840 --> 0:02:48.360
<v Speaker 1>brain imaging context. There's some techniques we can mention, but

0:02:48.720 --> 0:02:50.679
<v Speaker 1>you can't just like start up an f M R

0:02:50.720 --> 0:02:53.520
<v Speaker 1>I and then run it and hope somebody has an

0:02:53.520 --> 0:02:56.880
<v Speaker 1>experience of deja vu while it's running. Remember, like, deja

0:02:56.960 --> 0:03:00.440
<v Speaker 1>vu is relatively rare. Most people experience it at some

0:03:00.480 --> 0:03:02.560
<v Speaker 1>point in their life. But I think you know, an

0:03:02.560 --> 0:03:04.960
<v Speaker 1>average figure figure is that a lot of people say

0:03:05.000 --> 0:03:07.760
<v Speaker 1>they have a deja vu experience something like once a year.

0:03:08.280 --> 0:03:11.040
<v Speaker 1>So you couldn't expect for it to just happen while

0:03:11.040 --> 0:03:13.680
<v Speaker 1>you're looking for it. Yeah, deja vu is not really

0:03:13.680 --> 0:03:16.200
<v Speaker 1>the sort of thing you can just have on command.

0:03:16.280 --> 0:03:19.360
<v Speaker 1>Nobody can say, all right, have some deja vu. And likewise,

0:03:19.880 --> 0:03:21.920
<v Speaker 1>it's not that I haven't seen I don't think I've

0:03:21.960 --> 0:03:24.640
<v Speaker 1>seen any evidence or any claims of anybody who could

0:03:24.680 --> 0:03:27.960
<v Speaker 1>produce a feeling of deja vu. Just by willing it

0:03:28.160 --> 0:03:32.399
<v Speaker 1>that we will get into some unique cases a little later, right. Uh.

0:03:32.720 --> 0:03:36.520
<v Speaker 1>That would be an interesting uh skill if one had it. Now.

0:03:36.560 --> 0:03:39.480
<v Speaker 1>There are some cases where it appears that deja vu

0:03:39.600 --> 0:03:43.440
<v Speaker 1>can be triggered by certain clinical interventions. We mentioned a

0:03:43.480 --> 0:03:46.480
<v Speaker 1>couple of cases of it being associated with certain combinations

0:03:46.480 --> 0:03:48.880
<v Speaker 1>of drugs in the last episode, like a couple of

0:03:48.960 --> 0:03:53.600
<v Speaker 1>drugs used to treat the flu um. But also by

0:03:53.840 --> 0:03:58.080
<v Speaker 1>no big surprise here, electrical stimulation of the brain. Uh.

0:03:58.120 --> 0:04:01.240
<v Speaker 1>In his big review, Brown described abs findings about deja

0:04:01.280 --> 0:04:04.920
<v Speaker 1>vu and brain stimulation and patients with temporal lobe epilepsy. Again,

0:04:05.040 --> 0:04:09.040
<v Speaker 1>remember um from last time that deja vu is one

0:04:09.320 --> 0:04:12.080
<v Speaker 1>of the symptoms that has been described as part of

0:04:12.120 --> 0:04:16.320
<v Speaker 1>the aura preceding and epileptic seizure in people with temporal

0:04:16.360 --> 0:04:20.359
<v Speaker 1>lobe epilepsy. But another thing about temporal lobe epilepsy is

0:04:20.400 --> 0:04:24.200
<v Speaker 1>that in some cases in history, electrical stimulation of the

0:04:24.240 --> 0:04:28.400
<v Speaker 1>brain has been used in the treatment and diagnosis of

0:04:28.520 --> 0:04:32.320
<v Speaker 1>temporal lobe epilepsy. UM. And so I want to read

0:04:32.360 --> 0:04:35.240
<v Speaker 1>a section from Brown here writing about this. Brown writes,

0:04:35.320 --> 0:04:38.680
<v Speaker 1>quote with surface stimulation of the cortex, and that's electrical

0:04:38.720 --> 0:04:43.560
<v Speaker 1>stimulation Mullen and Penfield elicited deja vu experiences in ten

0:04:43.720 --> 0:04:47.760
<v Speaker 1>out of two hundred and seventeen people with temporal lobe epilepsy.

0:04:47.960 --> 0:04:52.440
<v Speaker 1>Recent procedures involving deep electrode brain implantation have shown that

0:04:52.520 --> 0:04:56.200
<v Speaker 1>deja vu, similar to one that occurs in the aura,

0:04:56.360 --> 0:05:00.400
<v Speaker 1>can be elicited with stimulation of the amygdala and hippocampus,

0:05:00.440 --> 0:05:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Although these experiences were not reported in detail. The deja

0:05:03.760 --> 0:05:08.039
<v Speaker 1>vu generally consisted of a sudden feeling of unfamiliarity in

0:05:08.040 --> 0:05:12.520
<v Speaker 1>the hospital environment and was often accompanied by epigastric phenomena

0:05:12.600 --> 0:05:17.280
<v Speaker 1>and fear and uh. Epigastric phenomena refers to strange feelings

0:05:17.279 --> 0:05:19.560
<v Speaker 1>in the abdomen, especially I think the upper part of

0:05:19.640 --> 0:05:22.760
<v Speaker 1>the abdomen. I've read it described as um getting a

0:05:22.760 --> 0:05:25.599
<v Speaker 1>feeling sort of above the stomach and right below the chest,

0:05:26.080 --> 0:05:28.400
<v Speaker 1>like this weird feeling, kind of like when you're on

0:05:28.400 --> 0:05:31.440
<v Speaker 1>a roller coaster and you're you're plummeting down on the

0:05:31.480 --> 0:05:34.400
<v Speaker 1>other side, you know that rising in the gut. Yeah, yeah,

0:05:34.440 --> 0:05:35.960
<v Speaker 1>I believe we discussed that a little bit in the

0:05:36.000 --> 0:05:39.600
<v Speaker 1>last episode. Brown writes quote. The elicitation of deja vou

0:05:39.720 --> 0:05:44.040
<v Speaker 1>through electrical stimulation may not be reliable hal grin at all.

0:05:44.080 --> 0:05:47.360
<v Speaker 1>In nineteen seventy eight, stimulated several dozen brain locations in

0:05:47.400 --> 0:05:50.600
<v Speaker 1>a group of people with temporal lobe epilepsy on two

0:05:50.640 --> 0:05:53.839
<v Speaker 1>different occasions, two weeks apart, and found that a number

0:05:53.880 --> 0:05:56.960
<v Speaker 1>of sites that elicited a deja vu on one session

0:05:57.080 --> 0:06:00.640
<v Speaker 1>did not do so on the other. Deja vu experiences

0:06:00.680 --> 0:06:05.599
<v Speaker 1>also resulted from stimulating the non diseased hemisphere, suggesting that

0:06:05.640 --> 0:06:09.080
<v Speaker 1>the experience is not necessarily specific to the tissue where

0:06:09.080 --> 0:06:12.280
<v Speaker 1>the seizure originates. So that's interesting. You've got deja vu

0:06:12.360 --> 0:06:16.360
<v Speaker 1>associated in some cases with people with temporal lobe epilepsy,

0:06:16.480 --> 0:06:20.800
<v Speaker 1>but that it appears like if you you stimulate one

0:06:20.839 --> 0:06:22.920
<v Speaker 1>part of the brain one week and it gives you

0:06:22.960 --> 0:06:25.479
<v Speaker 1>deja vu, but a different part of the brain the

0:06:25.520 --> 0:06:27.719
<v Speaker 1>next week that might give you deja vu, and maybe

0:06:27.720 --> 0:06:30.120
<v Speaker 1>the original place that gave you deja vu last week

0:06:30.160 --> 0:06:33.000
<v Speaker 1>doesn't give it to you anymore. So, uh yeah, there's

0:06:33.000 --> 0:06:37.599
<v Speaker 1>some kind of discontinuity here about how exactly stimulating different

0:06:37.640 --> 0:06:41.480
<v Speaker 1>parts of the brain contribute to the deja vu experience subjectively.

0:06:42.000 --> 0:06:44.400
<v Speaker 1>But there have been some other interesting things that I

0:06:44.440 --> 0:06:47.480
<v Speaker 1>know we'll get too later in the episode of trying

0:06:47.520 --> 0:06:52.359
<v Speaker 1>to trigger deja vu and otherwise neurologically typical people, for example,

0:06:52.480 --> 0:06:56.640
<v Speaker 1>using using certain types of virtual reality stimulation. That, yeah,

0:06:56.680 --> 0:06:58.279
<v Speaker 1>I think we're we'll get to that maybe in the

0:06:58.279 --> 0:07:00.960
<v Speaker 1>third part of today's episode, But I guess we got

0:07:00.960 --> 0:07:04.760
<v Speaker 1>to get directly to these four main theories explaining what

0:07:04.839 --> 0:07:06.760
<v Speaker 1>could be going on in the brain when you're having

0:07:06.800 --> 0:07:10.960
<v Speaker 1>deja vu. Um, assuming it's not like a supernatural phenomenon,

0:07:11.000 --> 0:07:12.920
<v Speaker 1>which we don't think it is, that there's a good

0:07:12.960 --> 0:07:16.400
<v Speaker 1>amount of evidence that it is a function of the brain.

0:07:17.240 --> 0:07:21.280
<v Speaker 1>So the ghost hypothesis is really not not not highly

0:07:21.320 --> 0:07:24.720
<v Speaker 1>valued scientific circles here. Yeah, so we won't be picking

0:07:24.800 --> 0:07:27.120
<v Speaker 1>up on that one today. But so again, these are

0:07:27.280 --> 0:07:31.960
<v Speaker 1>the four main branches that brown outlines are dual processing,

0:07:32.560 --> 0:07:37.280
<v Speaker 1>neurological dysfunction, memory error, and attentional catch up. And I'll

0:07:37.320 --> 0:07:39.640
<v Speaker 1>go ahead and say that I think the main two

0:07:39.840 --> 0:07:43.400
<v Speaker 1>branches that have explanatory power going for them today, at

0:07:43.480 --> 0:07:45.480
<v Speaker 1>least as far as I can tell, are the last

0:07:45.520 --> 0:07:49.160
<v Speaker 1>two I mentioned, like the memory ones and the attentional ones.

0:07:49.720 --> 0:07:51.840
<v Speaker 1>But since the other two have been very important in

0:07:51.920 --> 0:07:54.320
<v Speaker 1>the history of studying deja view, we should at least

0:07:54.320 --> 0:07:56.800
<v Speaker 1>talk about them for a bit. Um. So the first

0:07:56.840 --> 0:07:59.480
<v Speaker 1>one is this idea of dual processing. There are these

0:07:59.560 --> 0:08:03.000
<v Speaker 1>multiple hypotheses that fall into this category, but they all

0:08:03.040 --> 0:08:05.360
<v Speaker 1>basically amount to the same thing. They say, you know,

0:08:05.400 --> 0:08:08.640
<v Speaker 1>there are two different processes in the brain that usually

0:08:08.680 --> 0:08:13.120
<v Speaker 1>occur simultaneously. They happen at the same time, but occasionally

0:08:13.200 --> 0:08:17.720
<v Speaker 1>they become a synchronous, they get detached in time and

0:08:17.760 --> 0:08:22.040
<v Speaker 1>suddenly there's a lag between them. And these types of

0:08:22.080 --> 0:08:25.800
<v Speaker 1>explanations tend to be the oldest and least scientifically justified,

0:08:26.320 --> 0:08:28.720
<v Speaker 1>but they are kind of interesting to think about. So,

0:08:28.960 --> 0:08:31.960
<v Speaker 1>for example, one that Brown sites is the idea of

0:08:32.640 --> 0:08:36.480
<v Speaker 1>this old theory of dual consciousness. Uh. The idea is

0:08:36.559 --> 0:08:39.360
<v Speaker 1>that there there are two separate types of consciousness in

0:08:39.400 --> 0:08:42.720
<v Speaker 1>the brain. There's one normal type of consciousness, and what

0:08:42.800 --> 0:08:46.280
<v Speaker 1>that does is monitor everything that happens in the outside world. It's,

0:08:46.360 --> 0:08:49.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, your regular brain that's looking out through your

0:08:49.160 --> 0:08:52.400
<v Speaker 1>eyes and sees what's going on. And then the other

0:08:52.600 --> 0:08:56.880
<v Speaker 1>version is the parasitic consciousness, which we might refer to

0:08:56.960 --> 0:09:01.679
<v Speaker 1>as metacognition. It monitors the internal state of the brain itself.

0:09:02.160 --> 0:09:05.520
<v Speaker 1>And under this old hypothesis, deja VU is created when

0:09:05.600 --> 0:09:09.840
<v Speaker 1>normal consciousness is impaired by something like fatigue or stress,

0:09:10.440 --> 0:09:14.319
<v Speaker 1>and it's left up to the parasitic consciousness to evaluate

0:09:14.400 --> 0:09:18.440
<v Speaker 1>incoming information. And because the parasitic consciousness is not well

0:09:18.480 --> 0:09:22.920
<v Speaker 1>adapted to evaluating incoming information, it gets confused, and it

0:09:23.000 --> 0:09:26.000
<v Speaker 1>confuses what it's looking at now for a memory of

0:09:26.040 --> 0:09:29.800
<v Speaker 1>the past. Uh. While I like this idea, this one

0:09:29.840 --> 0:09:33.080
<v Speaker 1>appears to be entirely speculative. It's mostly based on like

0:09:33.200 --> 0:09:35.839
<v Speaker 1>nineteenth century conceptions of the mind and brain. So I

0:09:35.880 --> 0:09:38.880
<v Speaker 1>don't think this one is very likely a good explanation today.

0:09:39.320 --> 0:09:42.200
<v Speaker 1>Now another one, uh in this branch is would be

0:09:42.240 --> 0:09:45.920
<v Speaker 1>like encoding and retrieval. Brown says, this was proposed by

0:09:45.960 --> 0:09:49.400
<v Speaker 1>Denayer in nineteen seventy nine, and basically it takes the

0:09:49.440 --> 0:09:52.600
<v Speaker 1>form of a metaphor of the brain is a combination

0:09:52.760 --> 0:09:56.240
<v Speaker 1>tape recorder and player. Uh did you did you have

0:09:56.240 --> 0:09:58.400
<v Speaker 1>one of those when you're a kid? Robert? Oh? Yeah,

0:09:58.440 --> 0:10:01.160
<v Speaker 1>of course, but yeah, okay, So the metaphor here by

0:10:01.200 --> 0:10:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Dena Air is that your brain has a combination tape

0:10:03.880 --> 0:10:06.560
<v Speaker 1>recorder and player. And and Brown explains this well, so

0:10:06.559 --> 0:10:09.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to quote from him quote under normal conditions

0:10:10.000 --> 0:10:14.240
<v Speaker 1>memory encoding and retrieval operate in a manner similar to

0:10:14.360 --> 0:10:18.000
<v Speaker 1>the record and play heads respectively. On a tape recorder.

0:10:18.280 --> 0:10:22.360
<v Speaker 1>Either the record in code or the play retrieve head

0:10:22.440 --> 0:10:26.800
<v Speaker 1>can be on, but not both at once. On rare occasions,

0:10:26.840 --> 0:10:29.920
<v Speaker 1>the tape machine and a person's memory has both record

0:10:30.080 --> 0:10:34.959
<v Speaker 1>and play heads active simultaneously during a new experience, creating

0:10:34.960 --> 0:10:38.520
<v Speaker 1>a false sense of familiarity for the newly encoded experience.

0:10:39.320 --> 0:10:43.280
<v Speaker 1>So basically, the idea is that you are experiencing the

0:10:43.400 --> 0:10:48.680
<v Speaker 1>memory as it is happening, um, which sounds paradoxical, but

0:10:49.160 --> 0:10:52.080
<v Speaker 1>but the idea of encoding and retrieving happening at the

0:10:52.080 --> 0:10:55.760
<v Speaker 1>same time. Yeah, and so this never Brown says, this

0:10:55.840 --> 0:10:59.840
<v Speaker 1>hypothesis never really got developed beyond just this metaphorical stage.

0:10:59.840 --> 0:11:02.120
<v Speaker 1>Like he never you know, got into the nitty gritty

0:11:02.160 --> 0:11:04.520
<v Speaker 1>of like what parts of the brain this would exactly

0:11:04.559 --> 0:11:07.360
<v Speaker 1>be involving and how it would work. Um. But I

0:11:07.360 --> 0:11:11.160
<v Speaker 1>would say, while it is still at this metaphorical stage,

0:11:11.240 --> 0:11:16.040
<v Speaker 1>this is kind of close to some later, later explanations

0:11:16.040 --> 0:11:19.160
<v Speaker 1>that are backed up by more empirical research. I think

0:11:19.200 --> 0:11:21.319
<v Speaker 1>it's not quite on the money, but it's it's getting

0:11:21.360 --> 0:11:24.400
<v Speaker 1>part of the way there, especially I think, especially with

0:11:24.400 --> 0:11:26.320
<v Speaker 1>with some of the ones that we'll talk about with

0:11:26.320 --> 0:11:29.400
<v Speaker 1>with attention later on. Yeah, and also like how it

0:11:29.480 --> 0:11:33.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of helps to further breakdown the nature of of

0:11:33.760 --> 0:11:36.360
<v Speaker 1>something that is novel and something that is familiar and

0:11:36.400 --> 0:11:40.600
<v Speaker 1>how it basically works, you know, in our experience of

0:11:40.720 --> 0:11:45.040
<v Speaker 1>cognitive data. Yeah. Well, and it makes me think about how, um,

0:11:45.080 --> 0:11:50.080
<v Speaker 1>in a way, there's almost no real objective thing that

0:11:50.200 --> 0:11:53.800
<v Speaker 1>is novelty. You know that, Like every time you're looking

0:11:53.800 --> 0:11:56.200
<v Speaker 1>at anything in the world, in a way, it's sort

0:11:56.240 --> 0:11:59.440
<v Speaker 1>of novel because like your heads in a different position,

0:11:59.559 --> 0:12:01.680
<v Speaker 1>and you'll even if you're looking at something you've looked

0:12:01.679 --> 0:12:04.160
<v Speaker 1>at a thousand times before, the lights kind of different,

0:12:04.240 --> 0:12:07.000
<v Speaker 1>you're looking at it from a slightly different angle. The

0:12:07.080 --> 0:12:10.600
<v Speaker 1>brain just does a does a very good job taking

0:12:10.679 --> 0:12:13.760
<v Speaker 1>things that are you know, different data sets coming in

0:12:13.840 --> 0:12:15.840
<v Speaker 1>through the eyes or the ears or whatever it is,

0:12:16.080 --> 0:12:18.120
<v Speaker 1>and saying like, Okay, you know what that is. That's

0:12:18.160 --> 0:12:20.440
<v Speaker 1>the same coffee cup you've looked at a thousand times,

0:12:20.480 --> 0:12:24.679
<v Speaker 1>even though it's not a photo exact copy of how

0:12:24.720 --> 0:12:26.640
<v Speaker 1>it looked the last time you looked at it. Yeah,

0:12:26.640 --> 0:12:29.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, as since data goes the details of the

0:12:29.480 --> 0:12:31.839
<v Speaker 1>coffee cup are not that important, And the brain does

0:12:32.160 --> 0:12:35.320
<v Speaker 1>a pretty good job in in UM working with the

0:12:35.320 --> 0:12:37.600
<v Speaker 1>senses of letting that kind of fade into the background.

0:12:38.160 --> 0:12:40.200
<v Speaker 1>But then you know, any day you're able to pick

0:12:40.280 --> 0:12:42.839
<v Speaker 1>up that coffee cup and really focus on it and

0:12:43.120 --> 0:12:45.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of see it for the first time. And that's

0:12:45.480 --> 0:12:48.440
<v Speaker 1>one of the the crazy things about the the close

0:12:48.480 --> 0:12:53.720
<v Speaker 1>relationship between the novel and the familiar. Yeah, and that

0:12:53.800 --> 0:12:57.239
<v Speaker 1>emphasizes that like the novel and familiar, they're not objective

0:12:57.280 --> 0:13:01.199
<v Speaker 1>features of the world. They're like subjective simulation sans yeah.

0:13:01.440 --> 0:13:03.640
<v Speaker 1>This is this is almost an example of this, but

0:13:03.679 --> 0:13:06.840
<v Speaker 1>not quite. Um. I I don't I've had an Xbox

0:13:07.320 --> 0:13:09.920
<v Speaker 1>one controller for so long and I just discovered you

0:13:09.920 --> 0:13:15.480
<v Speaker 1>can plug headphones into the controller itself to get sound. Totally.

0:13:15.840 --> 0:13:19.800
<v Speaker 1>It's changed my life here in um. You know, self isolation. Oh,

0:13:19.840 --> 0:13:22.200
<v Speaker 1>now late in the night, your house is not filled

0:13:22.200 --> 0:13:26.959
<v Speaker 1>with tiny screams that right, right? Yeah, I want to Yeah,

0:13:27.000 --> 0:13:29.400
<v Speaker 1>if I want to play Doom Eternal at a at

0:13:29.400 --> 0:13:31.200
<v Speaker 1>a weird hour, I can. I can be the only

0:13:31.200 --> 0:13:33.920
<v Speaker 1>one to hear it. Likewise, my son is trying out

0:13:33.960 --> 0:13:36.480
<v Speaker 1>Minecraft for the first time, and we can plug him

0:13:36.520 --> 0:13:39.080
<v Speaker 1>into the the controller and then if he jerks the

0:13:39.080 --> 0:13:42.320
<v Speaker 1>controller around, he's not pulling things off of the you know,

0:13:42.360 --> 0:13:45.920
<v Speaker 1>the TV tray or something. So uh so yeah, but

0:13:45.920 --> 0:13:47.440
<v Speaker 1>but you know, there's an example. I don't know how

0:13:47.480 --> 0:13:49.360
<v Speaker 1>many times I've looked at this device, but I've never

0:13:49.400 --> 0:13:52.880
<v Speaker 1>seen this detail. And uh uh. You know a lot

0:13:52.960 --> 0:13:54.520
<v Speaker 1>of things in life are like that. You know, when

0:13:54.520 --> 0:13:57.160
<v Speaker 1>you really really stop to look at at it, you

0:13:57.200 --> 0:14:00.360
<v Speaker 1>can you can uncover the novel wrinkles and the thing.

0:14:00.760 --> 0:14:02.800
<v Speaker 1>I might want to come back to this example later

0:14:02.840 --> 0:14:06.080
<v Speaker 1>in the episode. Uh and maybe when we talk about

0:14:06.120 --> 0:14:09.360
<v Speaker 1>the memory and intentional branches. Okay, two more examples of

0:14:09.440 --> 0:14:12.880
<v Speaker 1>dual processing hypotheses. So another one Brown sites is. The

0:14:12.920 --> 0:14:16.240
<v Speaker 1>idea of perception and memory seems kind of similar to

0:14:16.280 --> 0:14:20.200
<v Speaker 1>the last one. It was proposed by a researcher named Bergson. Basically,

0:14:20.200 --> 0:14:23.760
<v Speaker 1>it supposes that perception and memory formation happened at the

0:14:23.800 --> 0:14:26.680
<v Speaker 1>same time. Like, you know, I I look at Gritty,

0:14:26.720 --> 0:14:29.880
<v Speaker 1>the Philadelphia Flyers mascot for the first time, my brain

0:14:29.960 --> 0:14:33.800
<v Speaker 1>sees him creates the memory of having seen him simultaneously.

0:14:34.360 --> 0:14:38.360
<v Speaker 1>Bergson suggests that sometimes stress or fatigue can cause the

0:14:38.400 --> 0:14:42.400
<v Speaker 1>newly formed memory to bump into perception, so that I

0:14:42.440 --> 0:14:45.920
<v Speaker 1>get the feeling that I have seen Gritty before. Again,

0:14:45.960 --> 0:14:48.560
<v Speaker 1>this one is kind of fuzzy and speculative as far

0:14:48.560 --> 0:14:52.120
<v Speaker 1>as hypotheses go. Well, you know, we all feel that

0:14:52.160 --> 0:14:54.360
<v Speaker 1>we've seen Gritty before because Gritty was with us in

0:14:54.400 --> 0:14:59.000
<v Speaker 1>the womb. Gritty is primordial. Yeah, Gritty was there before

0:14:59.040 --> 0:15:01.360
<v Speaker 1>we were born. You know that's going to happen one day,

0:15:01.400 --> 0:15:05.080
<v Speaker 1>like they they a big block of shale shares away

0:15:05.120 --> 0:15:08.080
<v Speaker 1>from a Cambrian formation and then just just the outline

0:15:08.080 --> 0:15:11.160
<v Speaker 1>of Gritty there among the trial bites. He was waiting

0:15:11.200 --> 0:15:14.120
<v Speaker 1>the whole time. Okay, But then the fourth one of

0:15:14.160 --> 0:15:18.000
<v Speaker 1>these dual processing hypotheses potheses. Sorry, this is the only

0:15:18.000 --> 0:15:20.680
<v Speaker 1>one of the four that really seemed all that plausible

0:15:20.720 --> 0:15:24.480
<v Speaker 1>to me. So this one is called familiarity and retrieval.

0:15:24.960 --> 0:15:28.080
<v Speaker 1>And this was proposed by a researcher named Glure in

0:15:28.200 --> 0:15:32.520
<v Speaker 1>nineteen nine. And Glore suggested that when we encounter an

0:15:32.560 --> 0:15:35.760
<v Speaker 1>image or an object or scenario or whatever it is

0:15:35.800 --> 0:15:39.240
<v Speaker 1>that we've seen before, there are two separate things that happen.

0:15:39.920 --> 0:15:43.280
<v Speaker 1>One is the retrieval of the past memories about that thing.

0:15:43.360 --> 0:15:45.800
<v Speaker 1>So I see Gritty, I have seen him before, and

0:15:45.840 --> 0:15:48.200
<v Speaker 1>I remember the other times I saw Gritty and had

0:15:48.240 --> 0:15:52.120
<v Speaker 1>thoughts about him. But the other thing is the emotion

0:15:52.240 --> 0:15:56.680
<v Speaker 1>of familiarity that accompanies the recall. So I see Gritty,

0:15:56.720 --> 0:15:59.720
<v Speaker 1>I have memories, but also I have a feeling. It's

0:15:59.760 --> 0:16:02.320
<v Speaker 1>this emotional feeling that, oh, I know who that is.

0:16:03.080 --> 0:16:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Uh that you know that is Gritty. I feel familiar

0:16:06.200 --> 0:16:08.480
<v Speaker 1>with what's going on right now. And from what I

0:16:08.520 --> 0:16:12.920
<v Speaker 1>can tell, there's not really any direct evidence for this hypothesis,

0:16:12.920 --> 0:16:14.920
<v Speaker 1>but this one does seem kind of plausible to me

0:16:15.000 --> 0:16:19.280
<v Speaker 1>because we've talked about other cases of mismatch between recognition

0:16:19.280 --> 0:16:22.960
<v Speaker 1>and familiarity. For example, in talking about cap Graw delusion,

0:16:23.000 --> 0:16:25.400
<v Speaker 1>I think we mentioned in Part one, which is this

0:16:25.440 --> 0:16:28.480
<v Speaker 1>delusion often caused by brain injury, in which a person

0:16:28.560 --> 0:16:32.560
<v Speaker 1>believes that their loved ones have been replaced by lookalikes

0:16:32.640 --> 0:16:36.960
<v Speaker 1>or doppelgangers. And it's believed that cap Graw delusion stems

0:16:37.040 --> 0:16:40.840
<v Speaker 1>from a malfunction in the brain where recognition is triggered.

0:16:41.000 --> 0:16:43.480
<v Speaker 1>So you see a person and you know who you're

0:16:43.480 --> 0:16:46.440
<v Speaker 1>looking at, like, yes, you know that that is Jeff,

0:16:46.920 --> 0:16:50.880
<v Speaker 1>but the normally accompanying feeling of familiarity is not there.

0:16:50.920 --> 0:16:54.480
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't get triggered. So you see somebody recognize as Jeff,

0:16:54.520 --> 0:16:57.400
<v Speaker 1>but he does not feel familiar. It doesn't feel like

0:16:57.480 --> 0:17:00.560
<v Speaker 1>your old friend, so you say, oh, he's and replaced

0:17:00.600 --> 0:17:03.400
<v Speaker 1>by a look alike. What's normally a case of dual

0:17:03.440 --> 0:17:07.199
<v Speaker 1>processing here has been severed. So if a dual processing

0:17:07.240 --> 0:17:10.400
<v Speaker 1>failure like this we're actually an explanation for deja vu,

0:17:11.160 --> 0:17:13.160
<v Speaker 1>I think it would have to go the opposite way, right,

0:17:13.160 --> 0:17:15.400
<v Speaker 1>It would have to go the opposite of cap Graw delusion,

0:17:15.440 --> 0:17:19.399
<v Speaker 1>where a feeling of familiarity is triggered while actual retrieval

0:17:19.440 --> 0:17:23.000
<v Speaker 1>of associated memories is not. And along these lines of

0:17:23.080 --> 0:17:26.320
<v Speaker 1>cap Graw delusion would would actually be more analogous to

0:17:26.359 --> 0:17:28.920
<v Speaker 1>the inverse of deja vu that we mentioned last time,

0:17:29.000 --> 0:17:34.040
<v Speaker 1>jama vu, in which a familiar object suddenly feels unfamiliar.

0:17:34.680 --> 0:17:37.400
<v Speaker 1>But again, from what I can tell, this kind of explanation,

0:17:37.440 --> 0:17:40.479
<v Speaker 1>I think it's perfectly possible, but I can't find direct

0:17:40.520 --> 0:17:43.199
<v Speaker 1>experimental evidence for it, so I think it might just

0:17:43.400 --> 0:17:46.679
<v Speaker 1>remain right now in the realm of like, yeah, maybe

0:17:46.720 --> 0:17:49.520
<v Speaker 1>something like this could explain some cases of deja vu,

0:17:49.640 --> 0:17:52.800
<v Speaker 1>but we we don't have strong evidence that these explanations

0:17:52.840 --> 0:17:55.399
<v Speaker 1>are the right ones yet. Alright, Well, on that note,

0:17:55.480 --> 0:17:57.359
<v Speaker 1>let's take a quick break, but when we come back,

0:17:57.400 --> 0:18:00.840
<v Speaker 1>we will continue to explore some of the explanations for

0:18:00.880 --> 0:18:06.800
<v Speaker 1>what may be going on with deja vus. Thank thank alright,

0:18:06.800 --> 0:18:09.080
<v Speaker 1>we're back, all right. So we just talked about the

0:18:09.119 --> 0:18:13.240
<v Speaker 1>first branch of possible explanations for deja vu. Uh, probably

0:18:13.280 --> 0:18:15.760
<v Speaker 1>the oldest branch of explanations, which was the idea of

0:18:15.840 --> 0:18:19.399
<v Speaker 1>dual processing that when you experienced deja vu, it's because

0:18:19.400 --> 0:18:21.840
<v Speaker 1>two different things that normally happened in the at the

0:18:21.880 --> 0:18:25.560
<v Speaker 1>same time in the brain get severed and one happens

0:18:25.600 --> 0:18:27.800
<v Speaker 1>after the other one, or they get you know, one

0:18:27.840 --> 0:18:31.040
<v Speaker 1>happens without the other one, and this causes this this

0:18:31.200 --> 0:18:35.200
<v Speaker 1>disconnect um. The next branch of explanations that Alan S.

0:18:35.240 --> 0:18:39.920
<v Speaker 1>Brown offers in his two thousand three paper are neurological explanations. Now,

0:18:40.040 --> 0:18:43.440
<v Speaker 1>the first one is seizures. We know that deja vu

0:18:43.720 --> 0:18:47.000
<v Speaker 1>is a you're not not super common, but a recognized

0:18:47.040 --> 0:18:51.720
<v Speaker 1>experience in the aura of people who have temporal lobe epilepsy.

0:18:51.800 --> 0:18:54.560
<v Speaker 1>So what if normal deja vu do you that happens

0:18:54.560 --> 0:18:56.879
<v Speaker 1>in you know, sixty percent of people at some point

0:18:57.880 --> 0:19:02.320
<v Speaker 1>it's actually just a kind of mild seizure. A lot

0:19:02.359 --> 0:19:04.960
<v Speaker 1>of people have proposed this over the years, but Brown

0:19:05.000 --> 0:19:07.240
<v Speaker 1>says that the evidence for this does not appear to

0:19:07.240 --> 0:19:10.080
<v Speaker 1>be very good. Though deja vu is a feature of

0:19:10.080 --> 0:19:13.679
<v Speaker 1>seizures for people with t l E, people with epilepsy

0:19:13.720 --> 0:19:16.840
<v Speaker 1>in general are not more prone to every day deja

0:19:16.920 --> 0:19:20.920
<v Speaker 1>vu than people without epilepsy, and people who experience more

0:19:20.960 --> 0:19:24.000
<v Speaker 1>episodes of deja vu than average are not any more

0:19:24.040 --> 0:19:27.240
<v Speaker 1>prone to seizures than anybody else. So again, we can't

0:19:27.240 --> 0:19:31.000
<v Speaker 1>actually look at deja vu as it's happening and compare

0:19:31.040 --> 0:19:33.320
<v Speaker 1>it to say, what's happening in the brain during a seizure,

0:19:33.600 --> 0:19:37.520
<v Speaker 1>but we can look at frequency, uh, between these two

0:19:37.800 --> 0:19:41.439
<v Speaker 1>sets of of individuals. Yeah, and so it just doesn't

0:19:41.520 --> 0:19:44.560
<v Speaker 1>look like seizures are going to be a good explanation

0:19:44.680 --> 0:19:47.200
<v Speaker 1>for deja vu. Generally, it looks more like there might

0:19:47.280 --> 0:19:50.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, deja vu just happens to be one of

0:19:50.680 --> 0:19:53.399
<v Speaker 1>the things that sometimes happens in the brain of somebody

0:19:53.440 --> 0:19:55.720
<v Speaker 1>about to have a seizure, but it's not overall a

0:19:55.800 --> 0:20:00.040
<v Speaker 1>generalized seizure phenomenon um. Now, the other major near a

0:20:00.080 --> 0:20:04.800
<v Speaker 1>logical explanation that Brown sites is neural transmission delay, and

0:20:04.840 --> 0:20:08.040
<v Speaker 1>this refers to a set of explanations where information traveling

0:20:08.119 --> 0:20:12.120
<v Speaker 1>from the perceptual organs such as the eye. Uh, it's

0:20:12.119 --> 0:20:14.560
<v Speaker 1>traveling to different parts of the brain, and it gets

0:20:14.720 --> 0:20:18.639
<v Speaker 1>delayed along one of those pathways by neuronal misfiring or

0:20:18.680 --> 0:20:21.560
<v Speaker 1>some of their malfunction. And one example that's given is

0:20:22.119 --> 0:20:26.040
<v Speaker 1>the two different hemispheres of the brain usually receive information

0:20:26.080 --> 0:20:29.359
<v Speaker 1>at the same time. But what if one hemisphere realizes

0:20:29.440 --> 0:20:32.800
<v Speaker 1>that you're looking at gritty slightly after the other one does,

0:20:33.720 --> 0:20:37.400
<v Speaker 1>And under this hypothesis, the delay causes a freshly perceived

0:20:37.440 --> 0:20:41.120
<v Speaker 1>stimulus to be interpreted as old information because one part

0:20:41.119 --> 0:20:43.960
<v Speaker 1>of the brain has already experienced it by by the

0:20:44.000 --> 0:20:46.160
<v Speaker 1>time it gets to the other part. Well, this seems

0:20:46.160 --> 0:20:48.080
<v Speaker 1>like a good place to move on to some of

0:20:48.119 --> 0:20:51.720
<v Speaker 1>the additional explanations, because we're talking about old information. What

0:20:51.880 --> 0:20:55.000
<v Speaker 1>he's old information but a memory. Yeah, exactly. So now

0:20:55.040 --> 0:20:58.080
<v Speaker 1>we're getting into those were the two older branches. Now

0:20:58.080 --> 0:21:00.000
<v Speaker 1>we're getting into the branches that I think are more

0:21:00.000 --> 0:21:04.359
<v Speaker 1>were favored among researchers today, the memory based explanations, especially

0:21:04.440 --> 0:21:09.439
<v Speaker 1>implicit memories and attentional explanations. Uh. Now, Robert, if we

0:21:09.480 --> 0:21:11.439
<v Speaker 1>if we go to memory based I think you're going

0:21:11.480 --> 0:21:13.760
<v Speaker 1>to get into this branch of explanations a little bit

0:21:13.760 --> 0:21:15.679
<v Speaker 1>more when you talk about the research by and M

0:21:15.680 --> 0:21:18.840
<v Speaker 1>cleary and Alexander B. Claxton. Later on, I saw you

0:21:18.840 --> 0:21:21.280
<v Speaker 1>had something about that, So maybe we can talk more

0:21:21.280 --> 0:21:24.000
<v Speaker 1>in depth about the memory based explanations then, but just

0:21:24.040 --> 0:21:27.160
<v Speaker 1>do a short version now. The gist here is that

0:21:27.440 --> 0:21:30.520
<v Speaker 1>desha vou is perhaps uh maybe it has something to

0:21:30.560 --> 0:21:34.720
<v Speaker 1>do with the way that memories are encoded and retrieved.

0:21:35.200 --> 0:21:38.120
<v Speaker 1>So imagine you're in one of these deja vu scenarios.

0:21:38.160 --> 0:21:41.760
<v Speaker 1>Maybe you're you're going down a staircase into a basement

0:21:41.880 --> 0:21:44.919
<v Speaker 1>in a house, and you suddenly get this flash like, oh,

0:21:44.960 --> 0:21:47.720
<v Speaker 1>I've been here before, but you haven't been here before.

0:21:48.400 --> 0:21:51.200
<v Speaker 1>What if when you're experiencing deja vu on that staircase,

0:21:51.440 --> 0:21:55.240
<v Speaker 1>you are remembering something you've seen before. It's just not

0:21:55.400 --> 0:21:59.040
<v Speaker 1>this house. It's not the same thing you're looking at now.

0:21:59.240 --> 0:22:03.720
<v Speaker 1>You're feeling familiarity because of some vague features of similarity

0:22:04.080 --> 0:22:08.159
<v Speaker 1>that overlap with your current experience and some other memory

0:22:08.280 --> 0:22:11.960
<v Speaker 1>that you are not directly accessing in full. Maybe when

0:22:12.000 --> 0:22:14.600
<v Speaker 1>I experienced the deja vu of like running into a

0:22:14.640 --> 0:22:17.679
<v Speaker 1>tree branch while playing in the yard. The feeling of

0:22:17.720 --> 0:22:20.480
<v Speaker 1>familiarity with the scene comes from the fact that there

0:22:20.600 --> 0:22:23.719
<v Speaker 1>was some other time I was playing in maybe a

0:22:23.760 --> 0:22:27.680
<v Speaker 1>similar looking place or a place with similar spatial arrangements

0:22:27.680 --> 0:22:30.760
<v Speaker 1>of objects, and my friends were standing around me in

0:22:30.800 --> 0:22:34.560
<v Speaker 1>a similar kind of orientation, and maybe I was injured

0:22:34.920 --> 0:22:37.879
<v Speaker 1>or or fell down in some other way. Except I

0:22:37.920 --> 0:22:42.000
<v Speaker 1>don't explicitly recall that whole episode. I don't remember where

0:22:42.040 --> 0:22:44.800
<v Speaker 1>it was, or who was there or what happened. I

0:22:44.920 --> 0:22:49.480
<v Speaker 1>just recall enough to recognize some basic congruities. And this

0:22:49.600 --> 0:22:53.159
<v Speaker 1>leads to that strange feeling of familiarity with no obvious

0:22:53.200 --> 0:22:56.920
<v Speaker 1>point of reference. So almost as if the the emotional

0:22:56.960 --> 0:23:00.720
<v Speaker 1>pattern of something that occurred stuck with you, but details

0:23:00.720 --> 0:23:04.560
<v Speaker 1>of it did not, um and and that's what gets recalled, right,

0:23:04.680 --> 0:23:06.960
<v Speaker 1>or details might have stuck with me in a way

0:23:07.000 --> 0:23:10.000
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't allow me to access the full scene as

0:23:10.000 --> 0:23:12.880
<v Speaker 1>a memory, right. So, like, I think a common thing

0:23:12.960 --> 0:23:14.919
<v Speaker 1>that's brought up in this kind of memory research is

0:23:15.000 --> 0:23:18.000
<v Speaker 1>like like spatial arrangements of things. You know, like if

0:23:18.000 --> 0:23:21.240
<v Speaker 1>you feel deja vous in a room, maybe you're not

0:23:21.359 --> 0:23:23.880
<v Speaker 1>in that room before, but we're in a room where

0:23:23.920 --> 0:23:26.879
<v Speaker 1>like the furniture was arranged in a very similar way,

0:23:27.240 --> 0:23:30.639
<v Speaker 1>and you don't explicitly recall that old memory, but something

0:23:30.720 --> 0:23:33.760
<v Speaker 1>gets triggered in like the navigation parts of your brain,

0:23:33.920 --> 0:23:38.040
<v Speaker 1>like what what's going on? I know this place? Yeah,

0:23:38.080 --> 0:23:40.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean it. We had to have to remind ourselves

0:23:40.119 --> 0:23:44.600
<v Speaker 1>that as far as novelty goes in life, oh, there's

0:23:44.600 --> 0:23:47.359
<v Speaker 1>only so much novelty that is really possible to a

0:23:47.359 --> 0:23:49.679
<v Speaker 1>certain extent, you know what I mean. Even if you

0:23:49.720 --> 0:23:52.720
<v Speaker 1>live a you know, a wild and varied life full

0:23:52.760 --> 0:23:56.520
<v Speaker 1>of of of travel and exploring new things, you're going

0:23:56.560 --> 0:23:59.080
<v Speaker 1>to encounter lots of situations that fit into more or

0:23:59.119 --> 0:24:02.280
<v Speaker 1>less the same uh pattern. You know, you're going to

0:24:02.320 --> 0:24:06.040
<v Speaker 1>go to a bathroom that looks a lot like other bathrooms.

0:24:06.200 --> 0:24:09.160
<v Speaker 1>You're going to do things more or less the same

0:24:09.200 --> 0:24:11.920
<v Speaker 1>way that you've done it before. I mean, we're we're

0:24:11.960 --> 0:24:14.359
<v Speaker 1>creatures of habit, we are creatures of pattern, and for

0:24:14.400 --> 0:24:18.280
<v Speaker 1>many things in life, they're they're only so many approaches

0:24:18.320 --> 0:24:22.000
<v Speaker 1>to how we might react to something or carry something out.

0:24:23.200 --> 0:24:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Uh yeah, yeah. No, novelty is total illusion, eternal recurrence.

0:24:27.119 --> 0:24:29.280
<v Speaker 1>You we've all been through this before. In fact, I

0:24:29.320 --> 0:24:34.040
<v Speaker 1>think you've said that before. No, I haven't. I don't

0:24:34.040 --> 0:24:36.680
<v Speaker 1>really mean that, um, you know. And so I was

0:24:36.720 --> 0:24:38.719
<v Speaker 1>thinking about this. I was thinking about, Wow, this might

0:24:38.760 --> 0:24:40.760
<v Speaker 1>sound like a weird way for the brain to work,

0:24:41.119 --> 0:24:43.639
<v Speaker 1>that you could have this feeling of familiarity about a

0:24:43.640 --> 0:24:47.119
<v Speaker 1>memory that you cannot explicitly recall. But I think there

0:24:47.160 --> 0:24:49.760
<v Speaker 1>are there are analogies to this and things that we've

0:24:49.800 --> 0:24:53.399
<v Speaker 1>discussed before. I was brought back to the idea of

0:24:53.440 --> 0:24:55.840
<v Speaker 1>tip of the tongue phenomenon. We did a whole episode

0:24:55.880 --> 0:24:58.919
<v Speaker 1>of stuff to blow your mind about this. Um you know,

0:24:59.000 --> 0:25:01.680
<v Speaker 1>this is where Hey, what's the name of the actor

0:25:01.680 --> 0:25:10.760
<v Speaker 1>who played riff Raff in Rocky Horror Picture Show. Well,

0:25:10.840 --> 0:25:14.320
<v Speaker 1>the correct answer is Richard O'Brien. But there were some

0:25:14.359 --> 0:25:17.919
<v Speaker 1>people listening right there who were like, oh, oh, I

0:25:18.000 --> 0:25:20.199
<v Speaker 1>know that, I know that, but you couldn't quite come

0:25:20.280 --> 0:25:22.800
<v Speaker 1>up with it, right. Why is it that you can

0:25:23.040 --> 0:25:26.320
<v Speaker 1>feel like you know a word or feel like you

0:25:26.359 --> 0:25:29.359
<v Speaker 1>know a name even though you can't conjure the word

0:25:29.440 --> 0:25:32.360
<v Speaker 1>or the name up right now. Perhaps a similar thing

0:25:32.640 --> 0:25:36.040
<v Speaker 1>happens with images or situations, kind of like a tip

0:25:36.040 --> 0:25:38.760
<v Speaker 1>of the tongue effect for things other than words, for

0:25:38.880 --> 0:25:41.800
<v Speaker 1>situations or for you know, images, you look at with

0:25:41.840 --> 0:25:45.119
<v Speaker 1>your eyes. You feel like you recognize this scene, but

0:25:45.200 --> 0:25:48.120
<v Speaker 1>you can't actually call up the memory that is causing

0:25:48.160 --> 0:25:51.520
<v Speaker 1>that feeling of familiarity, so I think, and there is

0:25:51.560 --> 0:25:56.440
<v Speaker 1>actually some research to back up certain memory based explanations

0:25:56.560 --> 0:25:59.840
<v Speaker 1>for for some day javou experiences. So at least as

0:25:59.840 --> 0:26:01.639
<v Speaker 1>far as I can tell, I think the memory based

0:26:01.640 --> 0:26:04.960
<v Speaker 1>explanations might not explain all deja vu, but are a

0:26:04.960 --> 0:26:08.560
<v Speaker 1>pretty strong candidate for explaining some cases of it. All right, well,

0:26:08.640 --> 0:26:12.120
<v Speaker 1>let's move on to attentional explanations, which which I think

0:26:12.160 --> 0:26:15.399
<v Speaker 1>is an exciting area because I think a lot of

0:26:15.440 --> 0:26:18.520
<v Speaker 1>the mysteries of human consciousness make more sense to me

0:26:19.000 --> 0:26:21.439
<v Speaker 1>when I had when I hear them explained in terms

0:26:21.480 --> 0:26:24.200
<v Speaker 1>of attention. Yeah, me too, And I think this branch

0:26:24.200 --> 0:26:26.119
<v Speaker 1>has a lot going for it. This is the fourth

0:26:26.160 --> 0:26:29.119
<v Speaker 1>of four, uh, and so these explanations are some of

0:26:29.119 --> 0:26:31.760
<v Speaker 1>the most simple, actually, but they make a lot of

0:26:31.760 --> 0:26:34.240
<v Speaker 1>sense to explain some cases of deja vu, and there

0:26:34.320 --> 0:26:37.199
<v Speaker 1>is actually some experimental evidence in support of them. So

0:26:37.240 --> 0:26:41.119
<v Speaker 1>imagine you're driving a car, right, and maybe while you

0:26:41.160 --> 0:26:45.399
<v Speaker 1>are driving, you're having a tense emotional conversation with the

0:26:45.400 --> 0:26:48.240
<v Speaker 1>passenger of the car. Maybe it's you know your spouse

0:26:48.359 --> 0:26:51.040
<v Speaker 1>or partner, or you know your your child or parent

0:26:51.200 --> 0:26:53.960
<v Speaker 1>or relative. You're having an argument or something, so your

0:26:53.960 --> 0:26:57.560
<v Speaker 1>attention is kind of divided, maybe like you're not paying

0:26:57.600 --> 0:27:00.399
<v Speaker 1>as full attention to the road and of you as

0:27:00.440 --> 0:27:03.919
<v Speaker 1>you should be. Then suddenly you see a man in

0:27:03.960 --> 0:27:06.719
<v Speaker 1>a cowboy hat pushing a grocery cart full of Monster

0:27:06.840 --> 0:27:11.360
<v Speaker 1>Energy drinks down the sidewalk, and you think, whoa deja vu?

0:27:12.200 --> 0:27:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Why do I feel like I've seen this guy before?

0:27:14.880 --> 0:27:18.360
<v Speaker 1>Under the attentional model, the answer could be that you

0:27:18.440 --> 0:27:21.760
<v Speaker 1>did see him before a couple of seconds ago, but

0:27:21.920 --> 0:27:25.960
<v Speaker 1>your attention was divided, and because you had your attention

0:27:26.040 --> 0:27:29.560
<v Speaker 1>wrapped up in this intense conversation and you weren't paying

0:27:29.600 --> 0:27:31.840
<v Speaker 1>as much attention as you should have been to the road,

0:27:32.320 --> 0:27:36.000
<v Speaker 1>you didn't consciously register seeing this guy a couple of

0:27:36.040 --> 0:27:39.800
<v Speaker 1>seconds before, but you did see him with some diminished

0:27:39.840 --> 0:27:42.960
<v Speaker 1>portion of your attention, And when you finally focus full

0:27:43.000 --> 0:27:46.159
<v Speaker 1>attention on him, he feels familiar, even though you're just

0:27:46.240 --> 0:27:49.280
<v Speaker 1>now consciously registering him. You know in a in a way,

0:27:49.359 --> 0:27:52.680
<v Speaker 1>this reminds me of a like a non dejavou experience

0:27:52.720 --> 0:27:55.520
<v Speaker 1>that I have sometimes where I'll I'll run across a

0:27:55.600 --> 0:28:00.720
<v Speaker 1>study or a paper that I maybe just glanced at

0:28:00.800 --> 0:28:03.199
<v Speaker 1>in the past, or maybe I only read the headline.

0:28:03.840 --> 0:28:06.000
<v Speaker 1>But now I've come back around to it, and I'm

0:28:06.000 --> 0:28:08.639
<v Speaker 1>reading it, you know, more closely, you know, and I'm

0:28:08.640 --> 0:28:11.360
<v Speaker 1>actually taking it in. And then I realized, Oh, I think,

0:28:11.600 --> 0:28:14.480
<v Speaker 1>I think I do vaguely remember this study from when

0:28:14.480 --> 0:28:16.920
<v Speaker 1>it originally popped up. Yeah, I mean, I mean in

0:28:16.920 --> 0:28:19.359
<v Speaker 1>that case, there's more of a time gap, right, So

0:28:19.400 --> 0:28:22.199
<v Speaker 1>your memory, I think, would be more accurate. Actually, And

0:28:22.240 --> 0:28:24.080
<v Speaker 1>I know exactly what you're talking about. I have that

0:28:24.119 --> 0:28:29.560
<v Speaker 1>feeling too, where like I I sort of graze over something, um,

0:28:29.640 --> 0:28:31.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, text content, and then I come back to

0:28:31.960 --> 0:28:34.600
<v Speaker 1>it later and it feels vaguely familiar, like out of

0:28:34.600 --> 0:28:36.919
<v Speaker 1>a dream, because I didn't read it really closely the

0:28:36.920 --> 0:28:39.200
<v Speaker 1>first time. But this time, instead of it being like

0:28:39.240 --> 0:28:41.600
<v Speaker 1>a gap of five years, it's a gap of say

0:28:41.760 --> 0:28:46.360
<v Speaker 1>like five seconds exactly. In Brown's words quote, a brief

0:28:46.400 --> 0:28:50.520
<v Speaker 1>initial perception of a scene under diminished attention is followed

0:28:50.560 --> 0:28:54.560
<v Speaker 1>immediately by a second perception under full attention. The second

0:28:54.600 --> 0:28:59.760
<v Speaker 1>impression matches that experienced moments earlier under degraded attention, and

0:28:59.800 --> 0:29:03.760
<v Speaker 1>the individual does not consciously identify the prior experience as

0:29:03.880 --> 0:29:08.480
<v Speaker 1>moments old, but rather attributes it to a more distant past. Uh.

0:29:08.520 --> 0:29:10.640
<v Speaker 1>And I think that there's a lot of potential in

0:29:10.640 --> 0:29:13.239
<v Speaker 1>this explanation. This could be what's going on in some

0:29:13.280 --> 0:29:17.080
<v Speaker 1>of these cases. Yeah, I feel like this one feels

0:29:17.120 --> 0:29:20.560
<v Speaker 1>like it fits really well with a lot of deja

0:29:20.640 --> 0:29:23.520
<v Speaker 1>vu experiences that that I can relate to. I'm not

0:29:23.640 --> 0:29:27.640
<v Speaker 1>sure that it fits as easily or or I think it.

0:29:27.640 --> 0:29:29.800
<v Speaker 1>It may still fit, but perhaps a little more sort

0:29:29.840 --> 0:29:33.480
<v Speaker 1>of cognitive work to figure out how it fits with

0:29:33.560 --> 0:29:36.520
<v Speaker 1>some of the other examples of the deja vu experience

0:29:36.600 --> 0:29:39.480
<v Speaker 1>that we've either discussed or will discuss. Yeah, I think

0:29:39.480 --> 0:29:42.480
<v Speaker 1>you're right, And I would be strongly inclined to suspect

0:29:42.560 --> 0:29:46.040
<v Speaker 1>that there are different explanations for different cases of deja vu,

0:29:46.120 --> 0:29:49.240
<v Speaker 1>that there's not just like one trigger that creates all

0:29:49.440 --> 0:29:53.080
<v Speaker 1>deja vu experiences, that it's, you know, just different kind

0:29:53.120 --> 0:29:55.400
<v Speaker 1>of things going on. My gut feeling here is that

0:29:55.520 --> 0:29:58.920
<v Speaker 1>probably some cases are best explained by h by the

0:29:58.960 --> 0:30:01.760
<v Speaker 1>implicit memory thing that we were talking about a minute ago,

0:30:01.800 --> 0:30:05.160
<v Speaker 1>and then other ones are better explained by the attentional

0:30:05.240 --> 0:30:07.840
<v Speaker 1>divide thing and then of course there are a few

0:30:07.880 --> 0:30:10.719
<v Speaker 1>that are probably just direct neurological issues, like you know,

0:30:10.760 --> 0:30:14.120
<v Speaker 1>when the brain is being stimulated or when there's a seizure. Now,

0:30:14.240 --> 0:30:17.480
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to come back to the link between anxiety

0:30:17.640 --> 0:30:20.640
<v Speaker 1>and deja vu, because I found a very interesting study

0:30:20.680 --> 0:30:24.360
<v Speaker 1>on this. Um. Apparently there is somewhat limited literature on

0:30:24.400 --> 0:30:27.960
<v Speaker 1>the connection between anxiety and deja vu. But one one

0:30:28.000 --> 0:30:32.040
<v Speaker 1>paper on the topic I came across was titled Persistent

0:30:32.320 --> 0:30:36.880
<v Speaker 1>Psychogenic Deja Vu a Case Report, And this was by Wells, H.

0:30:36.960 --> 0:30:39.600
<v Speaker 1>Moulin and Eth Ridge, and it was published in the

0:30:39.680 --> 0:30:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Journal of Medical Cases Case Reports. Uh, and this was

0:30:42.840 --> 0:30:47.360
<v Speaker 1>from So the researchers present the case of a twenty

0:30:47.400 --> 0:30:50.720
<v Speaker 1>three year old British man with a form of persistent

0:30:50.880 --> 0:30:55.240
<v Speaker 1>deja vu and this is observed in two he was

0:30:55.400 --> 0:30:59.160
<v Speaker 1>three years into his symptoms at that point. So, UM,

0:30:59.560 --> 0:31:02.480
<v Speaker 1>and if you're you're wondering, well, what is persistent deja vus,

0:31:02.480 --> 0:31:04.720
<v Speaker 1>it's basically what it sounds like. But I think more

0:31:04.760 --> 0:31:06.719
<v Speaker 1>of this will come come across as I as I

0:31:06.920 --> 0:31:09.800
<v Speaker 1>roll through his briefly through his case history. So the

0:31:09.800 --> 0:31:14.520
<v Speaker 1>subject here had a history of anxiety and de personalization

0:31:15.040 --> 0:31:19.760
<v Speaker 1>depersonalization UH if anyone doesn't remember as a state in

0:31:19.800 --> 0:31:23.320
<v Speaker 1>which one's thoughts and feelings seem unreal or not to

0:31:23.400 --> 0:31:26.040
<v Speaker 1>belong to one's self, and it may also entail a

0:31:26.120 --> 0:31:28.520
<v Speaker 1>loss of all sense of identity. He also had a

0:31:28.560 --> 0:31:32.320
<v Speaker 1>family history of obsessive compulsive disorder, so they when they

0:31:32.360 --> 0:31:35.280
<v Speaker 1>when doctors looked at him, they didn't detect any neurological

0:31:35.440 --> 0:31:39.040
<v Speaker 1>abnormalities and they assessed his recognition memory with tasks that

0:31:39.080 --> 0:31:41.960
<v Speaker 1>were frequently used with dementia patients, and they found no

0:31:42.120 --> 0:31:46.960
<v Speaker 1>memory defects. They found that he consistently understood the false

0:31:47.080 --> 0:31:49.840
<v Speaker 1>nature of the deja vus he was experiencing as well,

0:31:50.000 --> 0:31:53.280
<v Speaker 1>coming back to a key aspect of deja vu that

0:31:53.360 --> 0:31:56.920
<v Speaker 1>we were discussed in the first episode. So his reality

0:31:57.000 --> 0:32:00.640
<v Speaker 1>testing was basically intact as far as the hotel when

0:32:01.800 --> 0:32:04.880
<v Speaker 1>he didn't actually think that he was really having memories

0:32:04.880 --> 0:32:09.040
<v Speaker 1>of the present. Right. So, the patient's history of anxiety

0:32:09.480 --> 0:32:13.200
<v Speaker 1>was tied with fears of contamination, which led to excessive

0:32:13.280 --> 0:32:16.320
<v Speaker 1>hand washing and showers two to three times a day,

0:32:16.720 --> 0:32:19.920
<v Speaker 1>and then college anxiety made things worse, so he took

0:32:19.920 --> 0:32:22.480
<v Speaker 1>a break from it and he began to experience episodes

0:32:22.640 --> 0:32:25.000
<v Speaker 1>of anxiety in deja vu that would last for minutes

0:32:25.080 --> 0:32:28.000
<v Speaker 1>or even longer. They point out that he went on

0:32:28.080 --> 0:32:30.840
<v Speaker 1>holiday at one point during this period to a city

0:32:30.840 --> 0:32:33.000
<v Speaker 1>that he had visited before, so he did have prior,

0:32:33.080 --> 0:32:35.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, memories of having been there. But he felt

0:32:35.920 --> 0:32:38.280
<v Speaker 1>as if he had become quote trapped in a time

0:32:38.360 --> 0:32:42.040
<v Speaker 1>loop the whole time, and the experience was apparently somewhat terrifying.

0:32:42.080 --> 0:32:44.400
<v Speaker 1>So even though he knew, Okay, I'm not actually in

0:32:44.440 --> 0:32:47.040
<v Speaker 1>a time loop, it feels like I'm in a time loop.

0:32:47.320 --> 0:32:49.880
<v Speaker 1>I know I'm not, but it's really still terrifying to

0:32:49.960 --> 0:32:54.320
<v Speaker 1>experience totally, all right. And then he returned to college

0:32:54.400 --> 0:32:58.040
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand seven, and during this time tried the

0:32:58.120 --> 0:33:02.600
<v Speaker 1>psychedelic compound LSD, and they write, quote from then on,

0:33:02.960 --> 0:33:08.000
<v Speaker 1>the deja vu was fairly continuous. So quick note for everyone.

0:33:08.000 --> 0:33:11.920
<v Speaker 1>As you'll remember from our what five part series on psychedelics, UH,

0:33:11.960 --> 0:33:13.600
<v Speaker 1>this would this would seem to fall in line with

0:33:13.600 --> 0:33:17.600
<v Speaker 1>the observation that the psychedelic experience can for individuals with

0:33:17.680 --> 0:33:23.480
<v Speaker 1>a pre disposition exasperate a psychological condition. UH. Typically one

0:33:23.560 --> 0:33:26.479
<v Speaker 1>hears about this in regards to schizophrenia. So at this

0:33:26.520 --> 0:33:30.760
<v Speaker 1>point our subject is is experiencing near constant deja vus,

0:33:30.760 --> 0:33:32.880
<v Speaker 1>so he goes to see a specialist. They found that

0:33:32.880 --> 0:33:35.160
<v Speaker 1>he was experiencing anxiety in low mood, but for the

0:33:35.200 --> 0:33:38.000
<v Speaker 1>most part, uh Like, everything was normal. I think his

0:33:38.280 --> 0:33:42.920
<v Speaker 1>disassociative events scale score was slightly abnormal. Uh but but

0:33:42.920 --> 0:33:46.120
<v Speaker 1>but otherwise it was it was just this deja vu effect.

0:33:46.480 --> 0:33:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Um and And interestingly enough, they write that he took

0:33:49.800 --> 0:33:53.800
<v Speaker 1>to avoiding music and TV because he would invariably feel

0:33:53.880 --> 0:33:56.800
<v Speaker 1>that he had seen or heard the material before, and

0:33:56.840 --> 0:33:59.840
<v Speaker 1>then this would play into his deja vu experience or

0:34:00.040 --> 0:34:02.600
<v Speaker 1>make it more pronounced. Uh. And I found this to

0:34:02.600 --> 0:34:05.120
<v Speaker 1>be interesting. You know this idea because this gets back

0:34:05.120 --> 0:34:07.200
<v Speaker 1>to the idea of the novel and the familiar, Because

0:34:07.200 --> 0:34:10.440
<v Speaker 1>if deja vu is largely the experience all of the

0:34:10.480 --> 0:34:14.040
<v Speaker 1>novel as familiar, then would extreme cases like this require

0:34:14.080 --> 0:34:16.920
<v Speaker 1>one to just try to avoid novel things as much

0:34:16.920 --> 0:34:20.800
<v Speaker 1>as possible. M Yeah, just surround yourself with what's actually

0:34:20.840 --> 0:34:24.000
<v Speaker 1>familiar so that when it feels familiar, it doesn't feel unusual.

0:34:24.120 --> 0:34:27.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is this case sounds really disturbing because

0:34:28.560 --> 0:34:31.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't normally think of deja vu as something that

0:34:31.239 --> 0:34:35.120
<v Speaker 1>is inherently unpleasant when I feel it. It is strange,

0:34:35.719 --> 0:34:38.920
<v Speaker 1>but it's not. It doesn't hurt, you know it, It's

0:34:39.000 --> 0:34:43.560
<v Speaker 1>not in itself, uh, you know, worrying or or upsetting.

0:34:43.840 --> 0:34:46.560
<v Speaker 1>But I can absolutely see how if it persisted over

0:34:46.600 --> 0:34:49.680
<v Speaker 1>time it could take on that character. Yeah, I mean,

0:34:50.239 --> 0:34:52.640
<v Speaker 1>a sneeze isn't that bad, But we wouldn't want to

0:34:52.680 --> 0:34:55.680
<v Speaker 1>sneeze constantly. Uh. And I would say that like a

0:34:55.719 --> 0:34:58.719
<v Speaker 1>typical deja vu experience for me, and I think for

0:34:58.760 --> 0:35:03.200
<v Speaker 1>most people, is far less distracting than a sneeze. Um. Uh.

0:35:03.239 --> 0:35:05.719
<v Speaker 1>And And however, I will say that those experiences that

0:35:05.800 --> 0:35:08.799
<v Speaker 1>I related in the first episode that I had recently, um,

0:35:09.200 --> 0:35:13.680
<v Speaker 1>those were those were more potent, Those were those were

0:35:13.719 --> 0:35:15.719
<v Speaker 1>certainly more powerful. And I would not I certainly would

0:35:15.760 --> 0:35:18.759
<v Speaker 1>not want to feel that all the time either. So

0:35:19.000 --> 0:35:21.799
<v Speaker 1>the researchers in this case, though, they proposed that the

0:35:21.840 --> 0:35:25.280
<v Speaker 1>form of deja vous described here it might more accurately

0:35:25.280 --> 0:35:29.400
<v Speaker 1>be described as deja viku. Uh. This particularly strong sensation

0:35:29.440 --> 0:35:32.960
<v Speaker 1>of reliving the present moment quote. He complained that it

0:35:33.040 --> 0:35:36.880
<v Speaker 1>felt like he was actually retrieving previous experiences from memory,

0:35:37.200 --> 0:35:40.440
<v Speaker 1>not just finding them familiar. They concluded, quote, it is

0:35:40.480 --> 0:35:44.279
<v Speaker 1>plausible on neurobiological grounds that anxiety might lead to the

0:35:44.320 --> 0:35:48.560
<v Speaker 1>generation of deja vous. The hippocampal formation, a structure of

0:35:48.600 --> 0:35:52.520
<v Speaker 1>central importance and declarative memory, and the ability to engage

0:35:52.520 --> 0:35:56.520
<v Speaker 1>in recollection, is also implicated in anxiety as part of

0:35:56.520 --> 0:36:00.680
<v Speaker 1>the septo hippocampal system. Although this report does not prove

0:36:00.719 --> 0:36:04.080
<v Speaker 1>a link between anxiety and deja vu, it does further

0:36:04.120 --> 0:36:08.120
<v Speaker 1>support the suggestion that this area is worthy of further investigation.

0:36:08.400 --> 0:36:10.920
<v Speaker 1>That's very interesting, um, I mean, it makes me think

0:36:10.960 --> 0:36:16.759
<v Speaker 1>about the link between deja vu and stress or fatigue. Now,

0:36:17.239 --> 0:36:20.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure exactly how to separate out stress and anxiety.

0:36:20.920 --> 0:36:23.680
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a good deal of overlap between stress

0:36:23.680 --> 0:36:27.439
<v Speaker 1>and anxiety, but they're not exactly the same thing, right, Yeah,

0:36:27.480 --> 0:36:33.000
<v Speaker 1>they is often the case with human emotions and experience.

0:36:33.040 --> 0:36:36.319
<v Speaker 1>There's kind of a delicate web where all these things,

0:36:36.320 --> 0:36:39.920
<v Speaker 1>sometimes conflicting things are, it seemed to be in rather

0:36:40.000 --> 0:36:43.000
<v Speaker 1>close proximity to each other. Yeah. All right, On that note,

0:36:43.040 --> 0:36:45.000
<v Speaker 1>let's take one more break, but when we come back,

0:36:45.160 --> 0:36:51.920
<v Speaker 1>we'll discuss deja vu and dreams. Than all right, we're

0:36:51.920 --> 0:36:55.120
<v Speaker 1>back now, Robert. I remember a little while ago, we

0:36:55.160 --> 0:36:57.520
<v Speaker 1>got an email from a listener who wanted us to

0:36:57.640 --> 0:37:02.319
<v Speaker 1>look into the issue of deja of right, Yeah, yeah,

0:37:02.480 --> 0:37:04.200
<v Speaker 1>I believe that this was a listening by the name

0:37:04.239 --> 0:37:08.160
<v Speaker 1>of an uh and uh, yeah, she brought up well,

0:37:08.160 --> 0:37:10.440
<v Speaker 1>i'll just read apart from the email here quote. Several

0:37:10.480 --> 0:37:13.280
<v Speaker 1>months ago, I was introduced to the term de genrev.

0:37:14.040 --> 0:37:17.840
<v Speaker 1>I first thought it was the speaker's mispronunciation of deja vous. However,

0:37:18.200 --> 0:37:22.719
<v Speaker 1>it's an independent concept. Deja rev literally translates to already dreamed.

0:37:23.280 --> 0:37:25.839
<v Speaker 1>It's the sensation that one has experienced a real time

0:37:25.840 --> 0:37:28.239
<v Speaker 1>event in a previous dream. It can be considered a

0:37:28.280 --> 0:37:31.480
<v Speaker 1>form of precognition. I would love to learn a scientific

0:37:31.520 --> 0:37:35.520
<v Speaker 1>perspective and explanation for this phenomena. So that sounds like

0:37:35.520 --> 0:37:38.560
<v Speaker 1>a great idea, and let's let's look into it. Okay, Well,

0:37:38.600 --> 0:37:42.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, I would say, just uh from a personal perspective,

0:37:42.960 --> 0:37:47.160
<v Speaker 1>when I experienced deja vu, I don't know if my

0:37:47.239 --> 0:37:50.920
<v Speaker 1>brain makes a distinction between deja vu and deja vacu

0:37:51.120 --> 0:37:54.879
<v Speaker 1>and deja rev. Like it seems like when I get

0:37:54.920 --> 0:37:58.640
<v Speaker 1>that feeling of familiarity in the situation, I couldn't tell

0:37:58.680 --> 0:38:02.600
<v Speaker 1>the difference between whether I'm feeling like I already have

0:38:02.760 --> 0:38:05.719
<v Speaker 1>been here or feeling like I've already been here in

0:38:05.719 --> 0:38:09.400
<v Speaker 1>a dream. Does that make any sense? Yeah? Yeah, I

0:38:09.400 --> 0:38:13.120
<v Speaker 1>feel I hear what you're saying there. I I feel

0:38:13.120 --> 0:38:16.520
<v Speaker 1>like with my experience, I do sort of see two

0:38:16.840 --> 0:38:18.880
<v Speaker 1>Like there's there's the feeling of it. There's kind of

0:38:18.880 --> 0:38:23.320
<v Speaker 1>like that deja vous energy that you know, intensity factors

0:38:23.320 --> 0:38:26.279
<v Speaker 1>aside may essentially be the same. But then in some

0:38:26.360 --> 0:38:29.880
<v Speaker 1>cases I am instantly aware that it is somehow tied

0:38:30.040 --> 0:38:34.080
<v Speaker 1>to external sense data. And in other cases, particularly these

0:38:34.120 --> 0:38:37.719
<v Speaker 1>these stronger feelings that I've had, they seem to be

0:38:37.800 --> 0:38:43.600
<v Speaker 1>tied to internal feelings or thoughts, if that makes sense. Yeah, yeah, yeah, Um,

0:38:44.200 --> 0:38:45.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I mean, I guess the feeling of

0:38:45.880 --> 0:38:48.759
<v Speaker 1>deja vu for me is inherently kind of dream like.

0:38:49.600 --> 0:38:54.479
<v Speaker 1>Um it suddenly in waking life creates a little bit

0:38:54.520 --> 0:38:58.560
<v Speaker 1>of of an aura of the feeling one has in dreams.

0:38:58.840 --> 0:39:02.719
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, And so it naturally to me kind of

0:39:02.760 --> 0:39:07.120
<v Speaker 1>suggests like when I have that feeling of anomalous familiarity,

0:39:07.239 --> 0:39:10.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, did I dream this before? But I accept

0:39:10.200 --> 0:39:13.239
<v Speaker 1>that maybe another people there there is this clearer distinction,

0:39:13.400 --> 0:39:15.840
<v Speaker 1>like that there's one type of feeling like I've already

0:39:15.880 --> 0:39:18.680
<v Speaker 1>been here in waking life, and the other one is like,

0:39:18.760 --> 0:39:21.200
<v Speaker 1>I already experienced this in a dream. It's just for me.

0:39:21.280 --> 0:39:26.200
<v Speaker 1>They've they've never felt all that distinct from each other. Okay, well, um,

0:39:26.280 --> 0:39:28.480
<v Speaker 1>let's look at a paper here. I'm gonna refer to

0:39:28.680 --> 0:39:32.680
<v Speaker 1>frequency of deja rev effects of age, gender, dream recall,

0:39:32.760 --> 0:39:37.640
<v Speaker 1>and personality. By this is a threadle gorrets and funk Howser.

0:39:37.680 --> 0:39:40.960
<v Speaker 1>We mentioned funk Howser in the the the last episode

0:39:41.160 --> 0:39:45.600
<v Speaker 1>published in the Journal of Consciousness Studies in ten. Now,

0:39:45.640 --> 0:39:48.520
<v Speaker 1>as we've discussed already, you can broadly say, all right,

0:39:48.560 --> 0:39:50.680
<v Speaker 1>there's deja u. But then you when you really get

0:39:50.680 --> 0:39:54.000
<v Speaker 1>down into it, there are there's sort of different subsections

0:39:54.200 --> 0:39:56.759
<v Speaker 1>to deja vu, and you have things like deja rev

0:39:57.000 --> 0:40:00.800
<v Speaker 1>that come up well. According to uh to Dr Vernon

0:40:01.040 --> 0:40:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Nip in his book The Psychology of Deja Vu and

0:40:05.160 --> 0:40:08.279
<v Speaker 1>subsequent Publications, where in which he wrote about deja vu,

0:40:08.920 --> 0:40:13.960
<v Speaker 1>there are perhaps twenty different forms of the deja experience,

0:40:14.520 --> 0:40:16.600
<v Speaker 1>and uh man, I'm not going to read them all,

0:40:16.719 --> 0:40:19.480
<v Speaker 1>but there there's some really good ones. There's like um,

0:40:20.040 --> 0:40:26.080
<v Speaker 1>uh dejas sue already known intellectually. There's uh deja ditt

0:40:26.320 --> 0:40:29.160
<v Speaker 1>already said or spoken, so you know, referring to a

0:40:29.200 --> 0:40:32.840
<v Speaker 1>content of speech. Um. Basically they get into all the

0:40:32.880 --> 0:40:36.960
<v Speaker 1>different nuances of how you might interact with the world

0:40:37.160 --> 0:40:39.719
<v Speaker 1>or worth your own brain. Like there's a one for

0:40:39.800 --> 0:40:46.840
<v Speaker 1>already hallucinated, one for uh, already eaten de Genmans. That

0:40:46.840 --> 0:40:48.880
<v Speaker 1>would be a great one. They just shout out in

0:40:48.880 --> 0:40:53.240
<v Speaker 1>a restaurant as you are, um, enjoying a meal. Uh.

0:40:53.360 --> 0:40:57.279
<v Speaker 1>But then in one of the uh no, I'm thinking

0:40:57.520 --> 0:41:00.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking of the sopranos were like Tony is like,

0:41:01.080 --> 0:41:04.400
<v Speaker 1>humange uncle June, but then Uncle June is like, whoa

0:41:04.480 --> 0:41:08.640
<v Speaker 1>de jamange? I mean there's a there's deja music already

0:41:08.680 --> 0:41:11.879
<v Speaker 1>heard or played specific music. Uh. And then there's oh,

0:41:11.960 --> 0:41:14.279
<v Speaker 1>this one's really fat. I haven't looked into this one

0:41:14.600 --> 0:41:21.320
<v Speaker 1>in Greater Death, but deja paradox a paradoxy basically already paradoxical,

0:41:21.480 --> 0:41:24.200
<v Speaker 1>which that just sounds kind of mind rendering to encounter

0:41:24.239 --> 0:41:27.360
<v Speaker 1>a paradox and then have a deja vu about that paradox.

0:41:28.600 --> 0:41:30.680
<v Speaker 1>I can't even think of an example with them. I

0:41:30.960 --> 0:41:32.200
<v Speaker 1>don't like I said, I we have to come back

0:41:32.239 --> 0:41:34.720
<v Speaker 1>to that one. Maybe you, the listener, have an example

0:41:34.840 --> 0:41:38.239
<v Speaker 1>of of of a deja paradox experience that you can

0:41:38.760 --> 0:41:41.440
<v Speaker 1>you can share with us. But anyway, the main focus

0:41:41.440 --> 0:41:44.200
<v Speaker 1>of this paper was the de gen rev experience and

0:41:44.440 --> 0:41:46.680
<v Speaker 1>the idea of of a feeling as if you have

0:41:46.760 --> 0:41:50.000
<v Speaker 1>dreamt something before. And I think some of us can

0:41:50.040 --> 0:41:52.640
<v Speaker 1>probably relate to that with our deja vu. You know,

0:41:53.000 --> 0:41:54.880
<v Speaker 1>you might think weird, I feel like I have dreamt

0:41:54.920 --> 0:41:56.680
<v Speaker 1>this before, and perhaps some of us feel that more

0:41:56.719 --> 0:42:00.759
<v Speaker 1>strongly than others. Incidentally, funk, how was there? One of

0:42:00.800 --> 0:42:04.440
<v Speaker 1>the authors here points out on his website, Deja Experience

0:42:04.560 --> 0:42:09.120
<v Speaker 1>research dot org. That's it's with hyphens in there Deja

0:42:09.440 --> 0:42:12.600
<v Speaker 1>hyphen experienced hyphen research dot org. He points out that

0:42:12.640 --> 0:42:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Percy Shelley wrote of the connection between deja vu and dreams,

0:42:16.960 --> 0:42:19.720
<v Speaker 1>though his thoughts were not published till after his death.

0:42:20.640 --> 0:42:24.040
<v Speaker 1>So here's the quote. The scene was a common scene.

0:42:24.360 --> 0:42:27.000
<v Speaker 1>The effect that it produced on me was not such

0:42:27.040 --> 0:42:30.319
<v Speaker 1>as could have been expected. I suddenly remembered to have

0:42:30.440 --> 0:42:34.759
<v Speaker 1>seen that exact scene in some dream of long here

0:42:34.800 --> 0:42:39.000
<v Speaker 1>I was obliged to leave off, overcome by thrilling horror. Wow.

0:42:39.440 --> 0:42:42.040
<v Speaker 1>But back to this study in particular, they point out

0:42:42.080 --> 0:42:45.960
<v Speaker 1>that as a blanket explanation for deja vou. This one,

0:42:46.160 --> 0:42:48.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, dates dates back quite a long ways. Um.

0:42:49.320 --> 0:42:52.239
<v Speaker 1>One of the earliest explanations for the deja experience, I

0:42:52.280 --> 0:42:55.799
<v Speaker 1>think we mentioned the first one was when St. Augustine

0:42:56.239 --> 0:42:58.400
<v Speaker 1>wrote of it in the year four or sixteen, and

0:42:58.440 --> 0:43:01.160
<v Speaker 1>then Sir Walter Scott much later writes about it in

0:43:01.360 --> 0:43:05.400
<v Speaker 1>the eighteen fifteen. But the authors of this paper, they

0:43:05.400 --> 0:43:08.920
<v Speaker 1>set out to perform a survey of the experience. Now,

0:43:08.960 --> 0:43:11.279
<v Speaker 1>this was a survey of four hundred and forty four

0:43:11.320 --> 0:43:15.680
<v Speaker 1>people asking them about their experiences of deja vous, specifically

0:43:15.719 --> 0:43:18.440
<v Speaker 1>de gen rev the association between this feeling of deja

0:43:18.520 --> 0:43:22.040
<v Speaker 1>vu and their dreams, and so out of the four

0:43:22.480 --> 0:43:27.080
<v Speaker 1>forty four individuals that responded, um, it's interesting. So the

0:43:27.239 --> 0:43:30.319
<v Speaker 1>first of all, there was the frequency. Now in the

0:43:30.360 --> 0:43:32.439
<v Speaker 1>study they break they break it down a little more,

0:43:32.760 --> 0:43:37.319
<v Speaker 1>a little more detail. But basically they found that of

0:43:37.360 --> 0:43:41.400
<v Speaker 1>the people sampled uh said that yes, they did experience

0:43:41.480 --> 0:43:45.680
<v Speaker 1>deja rev. Uh. Now how often they experienced it varied

0:43:45.840 --> 0:43:49.920
<v Speaker 1>uh quite a bit. Um. For instance, twenty one or

0:43:50.040 --> 0:43:53.759
<v Speaker 1>four point eight percent UM said that they just never

0:43:53.840 --> 0:43:57.680
<v Speaker 1>experienced it. But in terms of those that did, like

0:43:57.840 --> 0:43:59.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, you had like forty one said that they

0:44:00.320 --> 0:44:02.920
<v Speaker 1>experienced it less than once a year, But then there

0:44:02.920 --> 0:44:06.000
<v Speaker 1>were eight individuals, which is only one percent of the

0:44:06.120 --> 0:44:09.239
<v Speaker 1>of of the the individual's polled here they experienced it

0:44:09.320 --> 0:44:13.279
<v Speaker 1>several times a week. Wow. Um, well, I'm curious how

0:44:13.320 --> 0:44:16.680
<v Speaker 1>this squares with previous research finding that you know, up

0:44:16.719 --> 0:44:19.840
<v Speaker 1>to something like a third of people or maybe up

0:44:19.880 --> 0:44:23.320
<v Speaker 1>tot of people, and some of these older surveys report

0:44:23.400 --> 0:44:27.080
<v Speaker 1>having never had any experience of deja vu. I wonder

0:44:27.120 --> 0:44:29.960
<v Speaker 1>what's going on because you talk to people nowadays, that

0:44:30.040 --> 0:44:34.080
<v Speaker 1>figure seems kind of high. I would figure that you know,

0:44:34.360 --> 0:44:37.520
<v Speaker 1>close to you know, nearly everybody has had like at

0:44:37.600 --> 0:44:40.840
<v Speaker 1>least some kind of deja vu experience at some point.

0:44:41.560 --> 0:44:44.160
<v Speaker 1>But these older surveys, you know, have it, have it

0:44:44.239 --> 0:44:46.799
<v Speaker 1>still very common but lower? I wonder if there used

0:44:46.840 --> 0:44:50.000
<v Speaker 1>to be more of a stigma or kind of weird

0:44:50.160 --> 0:44:54.440
<v Speaker 1>paranormal association with saying that you've had deja vu? Does

0:44:54.440 --> 0:44:57.040
<v Speaker 1>that make sense? Like maybe if people didn't think that

0:44:57.640 --> 0:45:00.320
<v Speaker 1>there could be any kind of like normal explo nation

0:45:00.440 --> 0:45:02.960
<v Speaker 1>for it, they'd be less likely to want to admit

0:45:03.080 --> 0:45:05.560
<v Speaker 1>it and talk about it like their gender norms about it,

0:45:05.600 --> 0:45:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Perhaps like a real man doesn't have deja vu or

0:45:08.280 --> 0:45:11.800
<v Speaker 1>a proper lady never experiences deja vu. It is simply

0:45:12.120 --> 0:45:17.839
<v Speaker 1>uh not done, uh, something to that effect. I don't know. Yeah,

0:45:17.920 --> 0:45:20.759
<v Speaker 1>that's true. You know, you can't be a cowboy if

0:45:20.760 --> 0:45:25.200
<v Speaker 1>you've got deja vu. It's true. I've never Uh, I don't.

0:45:25.200 --> 0:45:28.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't think even Corman McCarthy considered deja vu and

0:45:28.680 --> 0:45:32.040
<v Speaker 1>the American cowboy. Well, no, I'm just curious, and maybe

0:45:32.080 --> 0:45:33.920
<v Speaker 1>there's something I'm missing here. It just seems like in

0:45:33.920 --> 0:45:37.680
<v Speaker 1>these older surveys, fewer people admitted to having deja vu.

0:45:38.840 --> 0:45:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Now with this particular study, I should note that the

0:45:41.640 --> 0:45:45.239
<v Speaker 1>authors admit quote the high incidents of deja rev again

0:45:45.239 --> 0:45:48.839
<v Speaker 1>about in this sample might be explained by the fact

0:45:48.880 --> 0:45:52.960
<v Speaker 1>that the sample consists mainly of psychology students who phenomena

0:45:53.160 --> 0:45:57.480
<v Speaker 1>it is interesting and related to their chosen profession. That is, okay,

0:45:57.520 --> 0:45:59.919
<v Speaker 1>that makes a lot of sense that in these serve

0:46:00.000 --> 0:46:03.799
<v Speaker 1>as we may be getting a a less randomized, more

0:46:03.960 --> 0:46:07.319
<v Speaker 1>rarefied sample of like the kind of people who are

0:46:07.320 --> 0:46:09.680
<v Speaker 1>more likely to remember these experiences and want to talk

0:46:09.680 --> 0:46:12.880
<v Speaker 1>about them. Yeah, just more likely to be introspective about

0:46:13.040 --> 0:46:17.200
<v Speaker 1>your your own in reality. Um. They also point out

0:46:17.320 --> 0:46:20.880
<v Speaker 1>that the previously noted in other studies. Association between deja

0:46:21.000 --> 0:46:25.360
<v Speaker 1>rev and dream recall frequency seems, on one hand plausible. Okay,

0:46:25.440 --> 0:46:28.640
<v Speaker 1>so if we're making the connection between this deja experience

0:46:28.680 --> 0:46:31.839
<v Speaker 1>and dreams, a person with high dream recall might be

0:46:31.920 --> 0:46:36.600
<v Speaker 1>more likely to attribute deja vu experiences to prior dreams. However,

0:46:36.719 --> 0:46:41.120
<v Speaker 1>quote the impression of having dreamed, the actually occurring events

0:46:41.160 --> 0:46:44.799
<v Speaker 1>arises within that moment and usually cannot be attributed to

0:46:44.840 --> 0:46:47.800
<v Speaker 1>a particular dream in the past, even if the person's

0:46:47.880 --> 0:46:51.560
<v Speaker 1>kept dream diaries in order to document the dreams prior

0:46:51.640 --> 0:46:54.920
<v Speaker 1>to the de genrev experience. I think that squares with

0:46:55.000 --> 0:46:59.480
<v Speaker 1>the overall anomalous familiarity phenomenon, like when you have deja vu.

0:46:59.680 --> 0:47:02.680
<v Speaker 1>The whole point is that you can't relate it to

0:47:02.760 --> 0:47:06.719
<v Speaker 1>a specific experience in your memory. It's just the general

0:47:06.880 --> 0:47:10.840
<v Speaker 1>feeling that I've seen this before, uh and yeah, and

0:47:10.880 --> 0:47:13.560
<v Speaker 1>that seems to go go along with the dream phenomenon

0:47:13.600 --> 0:47:17.120
<v Speaker 1>as well. I also came across a twenty paper that

0:47:17.320 --> 0:47:21.080
<v Speaker 1>UH basically found that de gen rev experiences are common

0:47:21.120 --> 0:47:25.920
<v Speaker 1>after electric brain stimulation standard and treatment for epileptic symptoms. Now.

0:47:26.000 --> 0:47:29.520
<v Speaker 1>They looked at three different subsets of de gen rev episodic,

0:47:29.719 --> 0:47:31.799
<v Speaker 1>so you know, with a direct connection made to a

0:47:31.800 --> 0:47:36.480
<v Speaker 1>specific dream, half remembered scenes that echoed their current circumstances,

0:47:36.719 --> 0:47:39.319
<v Speaker 1>and an even dreamy or like state in which the

0:47:39.360 --> 0:47:43.239
<v Speaker 1>experience itself is dream or nightmare like. So I felt

0:47:43.280 --> 0:47:46.280
<v Speaker 1>that guest a little more perspective on on what maybe

0:47:46.320 --> 0:47:49.640
<v Speaker 1>going on here. So let's again remind everyone deja vu

0:47:49.719 --> 0:47:54.759
<v Speaker 1>the experience that something novel was actually familiar. So imagine this.

0:47:54.960 --> 0:47:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Imagine feeling this as you walk down a new hallway

0:47:58.440 --> 0:48:00.480
<v Speaker 1>and you're about to open a door or to an

0:48:00.520 --> 0:48:04.600
<v Speaker 1>office you've never visited before. You feel, at least for

0:48:04.719 --> 0:48:06.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, for a second there, for this fleeing moment,

0:48:07.040 --> 0:48:10.759
<v Speaker 1>that you know what will be on the other side. Now,

0:48:10.800 --> 0:48:13.840
<v Speaker 1>this is just a feeling, but it feels real to

0:48:13.920 --> 0:48:16.759
<v Speaker 1>the people who experience it. It feels like in this

0:48:16.840 --> 0:48:21.160
<v Speaker 1>moment of deja vous, you are able to see the future. Yeah,

0:48:21.200 --> 0:48:23.520
<v Speaker 1>and in fact, some people I think this is one

0:48:23.560 --> 0:48:27.120
<v Speaker 1>of the reasons that a lot of people have been

0:48:27.200 --> 0:48:29.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of insistent on viewing deja vu is some kind

0:48:29.960 --> 0:48:34.120
<v Speaker 1>of actual paranormal phenomenon and not just like a strange

0:48:34.160 --> 0:48:37.680
<v Speaker 1>feature of the brain um that sometimes people feel like

0:48:37.760 --> 0:48:41.680
<v Speaker 1>they are actually getting information about the future from it,

0:48:41.719 --> 0:48:45.040
<v Speaker 1>you know that like, I know what's going to happen next,

0:48:45.560 --> 0:48:47.239
<v Speaker 1>and really, this does I think feel like this kind

0:48:47.280 --> 0:48:50.640
<v Speaker 1>of thing adds another wrinkle to our understanding of people

0:48:50.640 --> 0:48:54.960
<v Speaker 1>who claim to have precognitive abilities or experiences in their life,

0:48:55.440 --> 0:48:57.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, because if you're if you're taking just like

0:48:57.640 --> 0:49:00.600
<v Speaker 1>the hard skeptical approach to that, then it's like, Okay,

0:49:00.640 --> 0:49:05.279
<v Speaker 1>some people are crazy, some people are scammers, maybe some

0:49:05.320 --> 0:49:08.960
<v Speaker 1>people are both of those. But but this by by

0:49:08.960 --> 0:49:12.920
<v Speaker 1>thinking about the link between deja vu and pre precognition,

0:49:13.160 --> 0:49:15.520
<v Speaker 1>you could well have a situation where someone maybe they're

0:49:15.520 --> 0:49:20.640
<v Speaker 1>more inclined to engage in uh supernatural ideas or some

0:49:20.719 --> 0:49:24.840
<v Speaker 1>sort of religious model that incorporates precognition. But if you

0:49:24.880 --> 0:49:27.439
<v Speaker 1>had just at least a few flashes of this sort

0:49:27.440 --> 0:49:30.279
<v Speaker 1>of experience, like a moment where you're like, yeah, I knew,

0:49:30.320 --> 0:49:31.600
<v Speaker 1>I know what's going to be on the other side

0:49:31.640 --> 0:49:33.719
<v Speaker 1>of that door, and even if it's it ends up

0:49:33.800 --> 0:49:35.480
<v Speaker 1>to not be the case, you know, you still have

0:49:35.600 --> 0:49:39.400
<v Speaker 1>that feeling that felt so real. Well, this seems like

0:49:39.440 --> 0:49:41.080
<v Speaker 1>the kind of thing that you could actually put to

0:49:41.120 --> 0:49:43.600
<v Speaker 1>the test, if only you could create scenarios and we

0:49:43.640 --> 0:49:47.520
<v Speaker 1>talked earlier about the difficulty of creating deja vu on command.

0:49:47.560 --> 0:49:50.040
<v Speaker 1>It's obviously not easy to do. But if you could

0:49:50.120 --> 0:49:52.560
<v Speaker 1>put together a test where you could sort of where

0:49:52.600 --> 0:49:55.279
<v Speaker 1>you could sort of try to stimulate deja vou like

0:49:55.440 --> 0:49:59.239
<v Speaker 1>experiences in people, you could actually put this to the test, right,

0:49:59.280 --> 0:50:01.399
<v Speaker 1>you could find out a weight, do people have any

0:50:01.440 --> 0:50:04.680
<v Speaker 1>additional predictive power? All right, well, let's let's jump into

0:50:04.760 --> 0:50:07.439
<v Speaker 1>this particular study that I have lined up here. So

0:50:07.719 --> 0:50:10.360
<v Speaker 1>this is a two thousand eighteen study that was published

0:50:10.360 --> 0:50:14.239
<v Speaker 1>in Psychological Science, and it was titled Deja vous An

0:50:14.239 --> 0:50:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Illusion of of Prediction, And this was by an Im

0:50:18.200 --> 0:50:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Cleary who we mentioned earlier, and Alexander B. Claxton so

0:50:23.600 --> 0:50:25.760
<v Speaker 1>clearly has put a great deal of research into deja

0:50:25.840 --> 0:50:28.280
<v Speaker 1>vu as well as tip of the Tongue over the years,

0:50:28.600 --> 0:50:32.399
<v Speaker 1>and her working hypothesis is that it's a quote particular

0:50:32.480 --> 0:50:38.160
<v Speaker 1>manifestation of familiarity. Something feels familiar when you paradoxically feel

0:50:38.239 --> 0:50:41.800
<v Speaker 1>that it shouldn't. In her last ten years plus of research,

0:50:41.840 --> 0:50:44.200
<v Speaker 1>she started hearing a lot about people's claims to the

0:50:44.280 --> 0:50:48.680
<v Speaker 1>precognition feeling, you know, again, not the reality of of

0:50:48.920 --> 0:50:52.279
<v Speaker 1>predicting the future, but the feeling the confidence that you, uh,

0:50:52.280 --> 0:50:54.600
<v Speaker 1>you know what is going to occur, and she wanted

0:50:54.640 --> 0:50:57.279
<v Speaker 1>to see if, as she suspected, the feeling was a

0:50:57.320 --> 0:51:00.560
<v Speaker 1>memory phenomenon as well. And of course the ad uh

0:51:00.680 --> 0:51:03.920
<v Speaker 1>complication here for for her is that you know, memory

0:51:04.080 --> 0:51:07.320
<v Speaker 1>does aid us in our ability to predict future of events.

0:51:07.520 --> 0:51:10.600
<v Speaker 1>So it's far from a trivial question. Memory isn't just

0:51:10.680 --> 0:51:13.400
<v Speaker 1>there to make you feel good or bad about the past.

0:51:13.640 --> 0:51:17.400
<v Speaker 1>It's about survival moving forward. So what did they do?

0:51:17.440 --> 0:51:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Always to discuss some of the issues with trying to

0:51:20.080 --> 0:51:23.279
<v Speaker 1>recreate deja vu in the lab, So their approach here

0:51:23.800 --> 0:51:26.279
<v Speaker 1>was to UH was was to basically pull it off

0:51:26.719 --> 0:51:30.120
<v Speaker 1>via virtual reality, based on past studies that found out

0:51:30.160 --> 0:51:33.640
<v Speaker 1>that subjects were more likely to report deja vu among

0:51:33.800 --> 0:51:39.200
<v Speaker 1>scenes that spatially mapped onto earlier witness scenes. UH. Subjects

0:51:39.200 --> 0:51:42.160
<v Speaker 1>were put through familiar virtual hallways and then ask if

0:51:42.160 --> 0:51:46.319
<v Speaker 1>they felt deja vu or premonition at key turns. So,

0:51:46.520 --> 0:51:47.799
<v Speaker 1>you know, this is a situation where you can just

0:51:47.840 --> 0:51:50.759
<v Speaker 1>imagine you know, Doom and Wolfenstein kind of hallways, you know,

0:51:50.840 --> 0:51:54.400
<v Speaker 1>virtual hallways, UH and some of the same mapping, but

0:51:54.840 --> 0:51:57.960
<v Speaker 1>but a different feel a different look. And then the

0:51:58.040 --> 0:52:00.919
<v Speaker 1>researchers would jump in at key points and see if

0:52:01.280 --> 0:52:04.000
<v Speaker 1>if there was a sense of deja vu or premonition

0:52:04.000 --> 0:52:06.480
<v Speaker 1>on the part of the subject. And these were their findings.

0:52:06.600 --> 0:52:12.360
<v Speaker 1>About half the respondents felt a strong premonition during deja vu. However,

0:52:12.400 --> 0:52:17.000
<v Speaker 1>they were no more likely to actually recall the correct answer,

0:52:17.400 --> 0:52:20.600
<v Speaker 1>uh than mere chance would explain. So that's not to

0:52:20.640 --> 0:52:22.839
<v Speaker 1>say that the take home here is that deja vu

0:52:22.920 --> 0:52:25.439
<v Speaker 1>experiences are not pre cogs. We know that we knew

0:52:25.440 --> 0:52:28.719
<v Speaker 1>that going in, but rather that it creates an illusion

0:52:28.840 --> 0:52:33.000
<v Speaker 1>of certainty, confidence in the choice that might be linked

0:52:33.120 --> 0:52:36.319
<v Speaker 1>to stuff like hindsight bias. Now, her work on all

0:52:36.320 --> 0:52:40.560
<v Speaker 1>this continues, Uh is you know, great deal more that

0:52:40.640 --> 0:52:43.960
<v Speaker 1>could be learned about the deja experience. But I think

0:52:43.960 --> 0:52:46.399
<v Speaker 1>this is really interesting because again you can see how

0:52:46.440 --> 0:52:51.520
<v Speaker 1>this might form the bedrock, uh for greater beliefs in

0:52:51.600 --> 0:52:55.080
<v Speaker 1>precognition and uh predictions of the future. You know, you

0:52:55.080 --> 0:52:58.279
<v Speaker 1>you build upon this with some sort of existing religious,

0:52:58.320 --> 0:53:03.720
<v Speaker 1>supernatural magical script about individuals who can sense the future,

0:53:04.120 --> 0:53:06.480
<v Speaker 1>and uh, yeah, it seems like they would one would

0:53:06.520 --> 0:53:10.239
<v Speaker 1>support the other rather well. Sure, all right, so there

0:53:10.280 --> 0:53:12.040
<v Speaker 1>you have it. We're gonna go and call it here.

0:53:12.640 --> 0:53:15.319
<v Speaker 1>We hope you enjoyed our two episode look at the

0:53:15.360 --> 0:53:20.400
<v Speaker 1>Deja Voo experience, all that it seems to incorporate, and

0:53:20.520 --> 0:53:23.080
<v Speaker 1>some of our best attempts to understand it. Though those

0:53:23.280 --> 0:53:26.800
<v Speaker 1>those attempts are still very much in process. The work

0:53:27.000 --> 0:53:29.640
<v Speaker 1>continues in the meantime. If you want to check out

0:53:29.680 --> 0:53:31.879
<v Speaker 1>other episodes of Stuff to Blow Your Mind, you can

0:53:31.880 --> 0:53:34.920
<v Speaker 1>find us wherever you get your podcasts wherever that happens

0:53:34.960 --> 0:53:39.239
<v Speaker 1>to be. Make sure you rate, review, and subscribe. Huge

0:53:39.280 --> 0:53:42.880
<v Speaker 1>thanks as always to our awesome audio producer Seth Nicholas Johnson.

0:53:43.080 --> 0:53:44.480
<v Speaker 1>If you would like to get in touch with us

0:53:44.520 --> 0:53:46.800
<v Speaker 1>with feedback on this episode or any other, to suggest

0:53:46.920 --> 0:53:49.200
<v Speaker 1>topic for the future, or just to say hi, you

0:53:49.200 --> 0:53:52.080
<v Speaker 1>can email us at contact at stuff to Blow your

0:53:52.080 --> 0:54:02.320
<v Speaker 1>Mind dot com. Stuff to Blow Your Mind is production

0:54:02.400 --> 0:54:05.120
<v Speaker 1>of I Heart Radio. For more podcasts for my Heart Radio,

0:54:05.320 --> 0:54:07.680
<v Speaker 1>this is the i Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or

0:54:07.680 --> 0:54:22.000
<v Speaker 1>wherever you listen to your favorite shows.