WEBVTT - Sacred Daggers, Part 2

0:00:03.000 --> 0:00:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind production of iHeartRadio.

0:00:12.960 --> 0:00:15.319
<v Speaker 2>Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind. My name

0:00:15.360 --> 0:00:15.880
<v Speaker 2>is Robert.

0:00:15.760 --> 0:00:18.400
<v Speaker 3>Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick, and we're back with part

0:00:18.440 --> 0:00:22.680
<v Speaker 3>two in our series on sacred daggers. In the last episode,

0:00:22.960 --> 0:00:25.360
<v Speaker 3>we talked a bit about the role of daggers beyond

0:00:25.400 --> 0:00:28.720
<v Speaker 3>your average D and D campaign, how they figure into history,

0:00:28.840 --> 0:00:32.319
<v Speaker 3>how they often have cultural significance beyond their simple use

0:00:32.360 --> 0:00:35.920
<v Speaker 3>as weapons, and then we looked at a couple of

0:00:36.120 --> 0:00:40.559
<v Speaker 3>specific artifacts. Rob you talked about the rock crystal dagger

0:00:40.680 --> 0:00:44.559
<v Speaker 3>of the Ivory Lady. Wonderful sequence of words. There a

0:00:44.720 --> 0:00:47.519
<v Speaker 3>fascinating blade found in the grave of a woman in

0:00:47.600 --> 0:00:50.199
<v Speaker 3>modern day Spain who died and was buried during the

0:00:50.240 --> 0:00:54.000
<v Speaker 3>Iberian Copper Age, which would have been roughly thirty two

0:00:54.040 --> 0:00:57.760
<v Speaker 3>hundred twenty two hundred BCE. This dagger was interesting for

0:00:57.800 --> 0:01:00.120
<v Speaker 3>a number of reasons, not least of which because of

0:01:00.160 --> 0:01:04.800
<v Speaker 3>its beautiful, semi transparent rock crystal blade is a blade

0:01:04.840 --> 0:01:07.759
<v Speaker 3>you can kind of see through, and for its inclusion

0:01:07.800 --> 0:01:10.520
<v Speaker 3>as part of an assemblage of grave goods, indicating that

0:01:10.600 --> 0:01:13.880
<v Speaker 3>the woman buried there was probably a figure of great

0:01:13.920 --> 0:01:17.720
<v Speaker 3>importance and authority. And then we also talked about the

0:01:17.760 --> 0:01:22.199
<v Speaker 3>bush Barrow Dagger, a famous Bronze Age masterwork knife found

0:01:22.280 --> 0:01:25.400
<v Speaker 3>in a barrow grave about a kilometer away from stone Hinge.

0:01:25.440 --> 0:01:27.560
<v Speaker 3>You can kind of see stone Hinge from this barrow,

0:01:28.240 --> 0:01:31.200
<v Speaker 3>And that one was notable because it also came with

0:01:31.240 --> 0:01:35.160
<v Speaker 3>a particularly rich and interesting collection of other grave goods,

0:01:35.400 --> 0:01:39.120
<v Speaker 3>but also because of the almost unbelievable level of craft

0:01:39.240 --> 0:01:43.040
<v Speaker 3>that went into its manufacture, particularly the way the handle

0:01:43.560 --> 0:01:47.000
<v Speaker 3>had been decorated with around one hundred and forty thousand

0:01:47.160 --> 0:01:51.480
<v Speaker 3>microscopic gold pins, each no wider than a human hair,

0:01:52.280 --> 0:01:56.040
<v Speaker 3>made at a time before magnifying glasses, leading some researchers

0:01:56.080 --> 0:01:58.480
<v Speaker 3>to speculate that it really could only have been made

0:01:58.920 --> 0:02:03.240
<v Speaker 3>by children child goldsmiths, since only children would probably have

0:02:03.320 --> 0:02:06.240
<v Speaker 3>had eyesight sharp enough to see and place the studs.

0:02:06.880 --> 0:02:09.280
<v Speaker 3>And now we're back today to talk about more rob

0:02:09.320 --> 0:02:11.799
<v Speaker 3>Have you had dagger thoughts since our first episode?

0:02:13.040 --> 0:02:16.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? Yeah, I look forward to getting into the dagger

0:02:16.840 --> 0:02:18.600
<v Speaker 2>that I'm going to pull out of the drawer next.

0:02:18.680 --> 0:02:22.120
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, I was thinking thinking a good bit about

0:02:22.120 --> 0:02:25.800
<v Speaker 2>it over the weekend. Did a little Dungeons and Dragons

0:02:26.120 --> 0:02:28.520
<v Speaker 2>playing over the weekend. Definitely thought about it then, and

0:02:28.880 --> 0:02:31.200
<v Speaker 2>you know, we called out in the last episode two

0:02:31.280 --> 0:02:33.240
<v Speaker 2>to our listeners and said, hey, do you have knives?

0:02:33.560 --> 0:02:35.320
<v Speaker 2>Do you want to show us your knives? And people

0:02:35.360 --> 0:02:38.400
<v Speaker 2>have already started doing so and it hasn't gotten weird yet.

0:02:38.760 --> 0:02:42.000
<v Speaker 2>So if you want to send us pictures of knives

0:02:42.040 --> 0:02:45.880
<v Speaker 2>that are of great importance to you or you know,

0:02:46.000 --> 0:02:50.000
<v Speaker 2>fascination points for you personally, you send us information about it.

0:02:50.040 --> 0:02:50.880
<v Speaker 2>We'd love to learn more.

0:02:51.160 --> 0:02:54.840
<v Speaker 3>Who sent us a picture of their knives? I was

0:02:55.160 --> 0:02:57.200
<v Speaker 3>just looking at our email, didn't see any knives.

0:02:57.440 --> 0:02:59.680
<v Speaker 2>Oh, somebody slipped a knife in there. I don't have

0:02:59.720 --> 0:03:01.880
<v Speaker 2>my email open in the moment, so I can't pull

0:03:01.919 --> 0:03:04.160
<v Speaker 2>it out. But yeah, somebody showed us some knives.

0:03:04.480 --> 0:03:07.880
<v Speaker 3>Did it go to my spam folder? What happened? I'll

0:03:07.880 --> 0:03:08.760
<v Speaker 3>have to figure that out.

0:03:09.040 --> 0:03:11.560
<v Speaker 2>Well, don't just reach blindly into your spam folder because

0:03:11.560 --> 0:03:12.959
<v Speaker 2>there may be knives in there, and I don't know

0:03:12.960 --> 0:03:14.600
<v Speaker 2>if there's sheathed or Notugh.

0:03:14.680 --> 0:03:17.000
<v Speaker 3>This just reminds me of a horrible story of a

0:03:17.040 --> 0:03:18.679
<v Speaker 3>good friend of mine who used to work as a

0:03:19.280 --> 0:03:21.920
<v Speaker 3>buyer at a used book in music store, who would, like,

0:03:22.360 --> 0:03:24.640
<v Speaker 3>you know, take in and price the items people wanted

0:03:24.680 --> 0:03:27.840
<v Speaker 3>to sell. So he was looking through a bag of

0:03:27.919 --> 0:03:30.560
<v Speaker 3>like old books that somebody had brought in, and just

0:03:30.680 --> 0:03:34.280
<v Speaker 3>like among the books in there was a food processor blade.

0:03:35.520 --> 0:03:37.400
<v Speaker 2>Stuck. Isn't it used as a bookmark?

0:03:37.640 --> 0:03:39.560
<v Speaker 3>I don't know. I don't know why it was in

0:03:39.600 --> 0:03:42.840
<v Speaker 3>the bag, but yeah, you got to watch out, got

0:03:42.920 --> 0:03:44.040
<v Speaker 3>agers of the profession.

0:03:44.120 --> 0:03:46.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah all right, Well, like we said last time, we

0:03:46.680 --> 0:03:48.920
<v Speaker 2>put together a whole list of knives, knowing that we

0:03:48.960 --> 0:03:52.880
<v Speaker 2>would not have time in space to cover all of them.

0:03:53.680 --> 0:03:58.120
<v Speaker 2>But we each sorted around in there and tried to

0:03:58.120 --> 0:04:01.440
<v Speaker 2>find a dagger or something like a dagger that we

0:04:01.480 --> 0:04:04.280
<v Speaker 2>wanted to dig into and discuss. Joe, what did you

0:04:04.360 --> 0:04:05.040
<v Speaker 2>pick for today?

0:04:05.760 --> 0:04:08.000
<v Speaker 3>So I would like to talk today about a style

0:04:08.040 --> 0:04:12.160
<v Speaker 3>of blade known as a tumi, which was made and

0:04:12.320 --> 0:04:17.120
<v Speaker 3>used by the pre Columbian indigenous peoples of the Central Andes,

0:04:17.240 --> 0:04:21.919
<v Speaker 3>particularly the coastal regions of modern day Peru. So this

0:04:21.960 --> 0:04:25.720
<v Speaker 3>would include the Moche people, the Scan also known as

0:04:25.760 --> 0:04:30.320
<v Speaker 3>the Lambayek, and the Chimu people. So this style of

0:04:30.400 --> 0:04:35.160
<v Speaker 3>knife is occasionally called a dagger in the literature, especially

0:04:35.240 --> 0:04:39.800
<v Speaker 3>older literature, though in more recent sources it seems people

0:04:39.839 --> 0:04:43.360
<v Speaker 3>more often just say knife or tumi. But as a dagger,

0:04:43.400 --> 0:04:46.719
<v Speaker 3>I think it's interesting because it challenges the boundaries of

0:04:46.760 --> 0:04:51.520
<v Speaker 3>the concept, both in shape and in function. So in function,

0:04:51.839 --> 0:04:54.160
<v Speaker 3>I think it challenges the idea of a dagger because

0:04:54.560 --> 0:04:58.560
<v Speaker 3>this item was clearly used for much more than just

0:04:58.680 --> 0:05:02.200
<v Speaker 3>offensive violence. In fact, that seems like if it was

0:05:02.320 --> 0:05:04.120
<v Speaker 3>used for that, that was one of its much less

0:05:04.160 --> 0:05:07.679
<v Speaker 3>common uses. Last time, we made the distinction that while

0:05:07.720 --> 0:05:10.880
<v Speaker 3>a knife usually refers to an all utility blade, a

0:05:11.000 --> 0:05:15.160
<v Speaker 3>dagger is usually understood to be something meant for violence.

0:05:15.920 --> 0:05:18.840
<v Speaker 3>The tome was used for all sorts of things, including

0:05:18.920 --> 0:05:24.359
<v Speaker 3>ritual sacrifices and as we'll get to, medicine. In shape,

0:05:24.400 --> 0:05:27.240
<v Speaker 3>it also challenges our idea of a dagger because the

0:05:27.279 --> 0:05:30.680
<v Speaker 3>particular to me tradition I'm talking about that the idea

0:05:30.720 --> 0:05:33.440
<v Speaker 3>the word to me actually just in a way means knife.

0:05:33.520 --> 0:05:36.000
<v Speaker 3>I'll get to that in a second. But the form

0:05:36.080 --> 0:05:38.680
<v Speaker 3>of to me I'm talking about challenges the idea of

0:05:38.720 --> 0:05:43.240
<v Speaker 3>a dagger because it is not long and pointy. In fact,

0:05:43.279 --> 0:05:46.720
<v Speaker 3>it's almost the exact opposite. The blade could be called

0:05:46.800 --> 0:05:51.239
<v Speaker 3>crescent shaped or semi lunar. Generally, it's a bent, semi

0:05:51.279 --> 0:05:56.120
<v Speaker 3>circular or half moon shape with the bend running perpendicular

0:05:56.480 --> 0:05:57.760
<v Speaker 3>to the length of the handle.

0:05:58.480 --> 0:06:01.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Looking at the vious images of this blade, it

0:06:01.240 --> 0:06:02.920
<v Speaker 2>reminds me a little. If I were to compare it

0:06:02.960 --> 0:06:05.919
<v Speaker 2>to a kitchen implement, and I do so with no

0:06:06.160 --> 0:06:08.760
<v Speaker 2>intended disrespect, I would think of one of these kind

0:06:08.760 --> 0:06:12.359
<v Speaker 2>of rolling blades that you use to cut I don't know,

0:06:12.400 --> 0:06:15.000
<v Speaker 2>sometimes like yeah, herbs, So, I guess would be the thing.

0:06:15.040 --> 0:06:17.360
<v Speaker 2>Not so much pizza, some of the PiZZ Some pizza

0:06:17.480 --> 0:06:19.720
<v Speaker 2>slicers have a little bit of a curve, but this

0:06:19.760 --> 0:06:21.760
<v Speaker 2>one is a sharper curve that. Yeah. If we were

0:06:21.839 --> 0:06:23.520
<v Speaker 2>to compare it to a kitchen implement, it would probably

0:06:23.520 --> 0:06:26.600
<v Speaker 2>be those yeah we used to slice up some herbs.

0:06:26.920 --> 0:06:30.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Or think the blade and the pit and the pendulum, yeah,

0:06:31.400 --> 0:06:34.400
<v Speaker 3>with the handle coming down the middle and a curved

0:06:34.400 --> 0:06:37.440
<v Speaker 3>blade running perpendicular to the handle. Yeah. So, as I

0:06:37.520 --> 0:06:40.839
<v Speaker 3>just alluded to. The word to me is a word

0:06:40.920 --> 0:06:44.440
<v Speaker 3>in the Ketchua language that just means knife, and so

0:06:44.720 --> 0:06:48.240
<v Speaker 3>it can be used to refer to a broad range

0:06:48.360 --> 0:06:52.440
<v Speaker 3>of sharp instruments or cutting tools made by the pre

0:06:52.600 --> 0:06:56.039
<v Speaker 3>Incan peoples of the Andes and sometimes by the Incas themselves.

0:06:56.680 --> 0:06:58.599
<v Speaker 3>So it is a word with a broader meaning, but

0:06:58.640 --> 0:07:01.880
<v Speaker 3>also it is used to refer to these half moon blades.

0:07:02.560 --> 0:07:05.719
<v Speaker 3>These half moon blades would have been called something else

0:07:05.960 --> 0:07:08.840
<v Speaker 3>by the pre Incan peoples who made them, but the

0:07:08.920 --> 0:07:12.000
<v Speaker 3>ketchwa word used by the Incas has been passed down

0:07:12.040 --> 0:07:14.600
<v Speaker 3>and used in the archaeological context, so that's what we

0:07:14.640 --> 0:07:17.400
<v Speaker 3>call them today. So I figure we should just look

0:07:17.440 --> 0:07:19.880
<v Speaker 3>at a couple of specific examples. Rob I've got some

0:07:19.960 --> 0:07:22.120
<v Speaker 3>pictures that you can look at in the outline here,

0:07:22.160 --> 0:07:24.520
<v Speaker 3>so we can discuss them. But folks at home, I'm

0:07:24.520 --> 0:07:27.720
<v Speaker 3>going to describe them in some detail and then talk

0:07:27.760 --> 0:07:31.600
<v Speaker 3>about what we know about these artifacts. So the first

0:07:31.600 --> 0:07:33.960
<v Speaker 3>one I want to look at is an example of

0:07:34.320 --> 0:07:38.760
<v Speaker 3>a beautiful ceremonial to me made by the Chimu culture

0:07:38.920 --> 0:07:44.320
<v Speaker 3>of northern coastal Peru sometime between eleven hundred and fourteen SEVENTYCE.

0:07:45.560 --> 0:07:49.680
<v Speaker 3>This is a highly ornamented dagger made of gold with

0:07:50.200 --> 0:07:54.320
<v Speaker 3>turquoise inlay. It's about thirty four centimeters long and thirteen

0:07:54.400 --> 0:07:58.040
<v Speaker 3>centimeters wide, with a half moon curved blade at the

0:07:58.080 --> 0:08:01.400
<v Speaker 3>bottom attached to a purpen deday killer shaft, and then

0:08:01.640 --> 0:08:03.800
<v Speaker 3>at the top of that shaft, coming up from the

0:08:03.840 --> 0:08:08.720
<v Speaker 3>half moon, a gold humanoid figure with a large broad

0:08:08.920 --> 0:08:12.320
<v Speaker 3>head and face in proportion to the body, topped with

0:08:12.480 --> 0:08:17.200
<v Speaker 3>a patterned gold head dress with inset turquoise discs and

0:08:17.320 --> 0:08:21.320
<v Speaker 3>also turquoise discs gauging the lobes of the figure's ears.

0:08:21.840 --> 0:08:23.920
<v Speaker 3>And then we see the posture of the figures. The

0:08:24.240 --> 0:08:27.480
<v Speaker 3>arms are folded in on the stomach, not across each other,

0:08:27.520 --> 0:08:29.720
<v Speaker 3>but just coming in toward the belly, button folded in

0:08:29.760 --> 0:08:32.160
<v Speaker 3>on the stomach, feet splayed outwards.

0:08:32.679 --> 0:08:36.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's quite splendid looking. I mean, it is the

0:08:36.679 --> 0:08:40.960
<v Speaker 2>very definition of a ceremonial implement, right, I mean you

0:08:40.960 --> 0:08:43.680
<v Speaker 2>can tell that. Not to say it had no utility.

0:08:43.760 --> 0:08:45.360
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure you're going to you're about to get into that,

0:08:45.440 --> 0:08:47.240
<v Speaker 2>but you can tell that, especially as far as the

0:08:47.240 --> 0:08:52.160
<v Speaker 2>handle is concerned, style was more. The aesthetics of the

0:08:52.160 --> 0:08:54.520
<v Speaker 2>thing were far more important than like, is this a

0:08:54.559 --> 0:08:57.120
<v Speaker 2>good grip? Can I hold this firmly in one hand

0:08:57.200 --> 0:08:58.360
<v Speaker 2>or two hands? And so forth?

0:08:58.440 --> 0:09:02.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, this was a symbol of power. So this piece

0:09:02.200 --> 0:09:05.520
<v Speaker 3>is currently held by the Art Institute of Chicago, and

0:09:05.640 --> 0:09:08.880
<v Speaker 3>so I'm going to add some details from their exhibit materials.

0:09:09.280 --> 0:09:12.640
<v Speaker 3>The figure depicted on the Toomey handle that the person

0:09:12.720 --> 0:09:16.200
<v Speaker 3>here rendered in gold with the turquoise is thought to

0:09:16.280 --> 0:09:19.160
<v Speaker 3>be we don't know for sure, but is strongly suspected

0:09:19.200 --> 0:09:23.440
<v Speaker 3>by experts to be a legendary founding father known as

0:09:23.760 --> 0:09:29.040
<v Speaker 3>name Lap that is spelled in English Naymlap. I hope

0:09:29.080 --> 0:09:31.199
<v Speaker 3>I'm saying that right, and I apologize if I get

0:09:31.200 --> 0:09:34.600
<v Speaker 3>any other pronunciations wrong in this section. I'm doing my best.

0:09:34.640 --> 0:09:38.080
<v Speaker 3>Here a figure known as name Lap who is said

0:09:38.120 --> 0:09:41.680
<v Speaker 3>to have been the hero who settled or colonized the

0:09:41.760 --> 0:09:46.240
<v Speaker 3>region of the Lembayak Valley on the coast of Peru

0:09:46.600 --> 0:09:50.880
<v Speaker 3>and formed a powerful ruling dynasty that lasted many generations.

0:09:51.880 --> 0:09:54.679
<v Speaker 3>So I was looking up stories about this figure, name Lap,

0:09:55.200 --> 0:09:58.439
<v Speaker 3>and I found some more details in a UCLA Today

0:09:58.600 --> 0:10:02.120
<v Speaker 3>article by Cynthia Lee about the work of an archaeologist

0:10:02.240 --> 0:10:05.120
<v Speaker 3>named Christopher Donna And this article was from twenty twelve.

0:10:05.200 --> 0:10:09.640
<v Speaker 3>I believe Donnan studied the relationship between the oral tradition

0:10:09.880 --> 0:10:13.839
<v Speaker 3>of name Lap and the archaeological record at a couple

0:10:13.880 --> 0:10:17.960
<v Speaker 3>of sites in the Lumbayaka Valley. So it is said

0:10:18.120 --> 0:10:21.440
<v Speaker 3>that Name Lap arrived to the coast of Peru on

0:10:21.480 --> 0:10:25.319
<v Speaker 3>a fleet of balsa wood rafts with a large entourage

0:10:25.360 --> 0:10:28.560
<v Speaker 3>that included his wife and many concubines, as well as

0:10:28.559 --> 0:10:31.760
<v Speaker 3>a host of warriors and lieutenants. And he brought with

0:10:31.920 --> 0:10:36.560
<v Speaker 3>him a holy idol made of green stone that I

0:10:36.559 --> 0:10:39.200
<v Speaker 3>think in some tellings is said to be his own

0:10:39.240 --> 0:10:41.800
<v Speaker 3>image in a way, that was kept in his palace.

0:10:42.240 --> 0:10:44.440
<v Speaker 3>And he seems to have been honored in ways that

0:10:44.520 --> 0:10:50.199
<v Speaker 3>are symbolically associated with the sea, receiving fanfare on seashell trumpets,

0:10:50.960 --> 0:10:53.600
<v Speaker 3>and I thought this was interesting. He was so powerful

0:10:53.600 --> 0:10:56.760
<v Speaker 3>and revered that his servants would spread a carpet of

0:10:56.840 --> 0:10:59.920
<v Speaker 3>ground up seashells on the earth wherever he walked.

0:11:00.640 --> 0:11:03.040
<v Speaker 2>Ooh nice, I mean that would also just be good

0:11:03.080 --> 0:11:03.600
<v Speaker 2>for grip.

0:11:04.320 --> 0:11:08.079
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. So it said that when he died in his palace,

0:11:08.160 --> 0:11:11.000
<v Speaker 3>his servants originally kept his death a secret for fear

0:11:11.040 --> 0:11:14.200
<v Speaker 3>of dismaying the people, and when news of his death

0:11:14.240 --> 0:11:17.560
<v Speaker 3>finally spread, people went out wandering the mountains to look

0:11:17.600 --> 0:11:21.599
<v Speaker 3>for him. So, coming back to this specific to me,

0:11:21.720 --> 0:11:25.480
<v Speaker 3>assuming that that is the figure depicted on it, name

0:11:25.600 --> 0:11:28.840
<v Speaker 3>lap does seem to have often been depicted in gold

0:11:28.920 --> 0:11:33.880
<v Speaker 3>with these turquoise inlays in other representations as well, and

0:11:34.480 --> 0:11:38.160
<v Speaker 3>many of the indigenous peoples of Peru used turquoise to

0:11:38.240 --> 0:11:42.120
<v Speaker 3>symbolize the spiritual power of water and the sky, kind

0:11:42.120 --> 0:11:44.800
<v Speaker 3>of in the same way that gold might symbolize the

0:11:44.880 --> 0:11:46.240
<v Speaker 3>spiritual power of the sun.

0:11:46.720 --> 0:11:47.280
<v Speaker 2>Ah.

0:11:47.760 --> 0:11:51.160
<v Speaker 3>The museum material here says that this ceremonial to me

0:11:51.720 --> 0:11:55.640
<v Speaker 3>would be carried by rulers of the royal dynasty, and

0:11:55.800 --> 0:11:58.000
<v Speaker 3>the way I understand what I'm reading about it, it

0:11:58.040 --> 0:12:03.319
<v Speaker 3>sounds like it was a highly value symbolic kingly replica

0:12:04.000 --> 0:12:08.480
<v Speaker 3>of the regular semi circular copper alloy or bronze knives

0:12:08.880 --> 0:12:12.600
<v Speaker 3>that would have been used to carry out animal sacrifices.

0:12:13.240 --> 0:12:17.040
<v Speaker 3>So I was thinking about this like a tool of

0:12:17.200 --> 0:12:21.240
<v Speaker 3>religious ritual in form. But the question is would this

0:12:21.360 --> 0:12:24.559
<v Speaker 3>specific one, this one held by a member of the

0:12:25.200 --> 0:12:29.160
<v Speaker 3>royal dynasty, be used in practice. I couldn't find a

0:12:29.200 --> 0:12:32.320
<v Speaker 3>definitive answer to that, but my best guess based on

0:12:32.480 --> 0:12:36.680
<v Speaker 3>what I'm reading is probably not. It might be symbolic,

0:12:36.840 --> 0:12:40.760
<v Speaker 3>so as a as a gold version of a tool

0:12:40.920 --> 0:12:44.280
<v Speaker 3>used in ritual, it would kind of symbolize the king's

0:12:44.440 --> 0:12:49.560
<v Speaker 3>power over the whole religious enterprise of the culture. Rough analogy,

0:12:49.600 --> 0:12:51.440
<v Speaker 3>but kind of like if a Christian king had a

0:12:51.480 --> 0:12:55.160
<v Speaker 3>gold communion chalice and people don't actually drink the wine

0:12:55.160 --> 0:12:57.719
<v Speaker 3>out of this one at the church services, but it

0:12:57.800 --> 0:13:01.320
<v Speaker 3>might symbolize the King's power and relationship to the central

0:13:01.400 --> 0:13:02.400
<v Speaker 3>ritual of the church.

0:13:02.960 --> 0:13:07.199
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Or here's there's another rougher comparison. Again, no disrespect

0:13:07.240 --> 0:13:10.240
<v Speaker 2>intended to anyone out there, but it's kind of like

0:13:10.320 --> 0:13:13.600
<v Speaker 2>if if you go into a kitchen from the late seventies,

0:13:13.640 --> 0:13:17.360
<v Speaker 2>early eighties and there is a decorative jello mold hanging

0:13:17.360 --> 0:13:19.920
<v Speaker 2>on the wall that is not actually used to make.

0:13:19.840 --> 0:13:24.079
<v Speaker 3>Jello, Okay, yeah, but it doesn't have to.

0:13:24.000 --> 0:13:27.800
<v Speaker 2>Be clear, probably doesn't have any kind of religious sentiments

0:13:27.840 --> 0:13:31.360
<v Speaker 2>tied up in it, but is purely decorative. Meanwhile, in

0:13:31.400 --> 0:13:34.480
<v Speaker 2>a drawer somewhere, there is some sort of an implement

0:13:34.520 --> 0:13:36.960
<v Speaker 2>that is used to make jello, an actual cello mold,

0:13:37.000 --> 0:13:38.160
<v Speaker 2>a functional jello mold.

0:13:38.640 --> 0:13:41.000
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah. Another one I would think of along those

0:13:41.040 --> 0:13:43.880
<v Speaker 3>lines is like a decorative tea set. Nobody ever actually

0:13:43.920 --> 0:13:46.360
<v Speaker 3>drinks tea out of these, but yeah.

0:13:46.160 --> 0:13:48.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and sometimes it's some cases it's not safe to

0:13:48.559 --> 0:13:51.720
<v Speaker 2>drink tea out of a decorative teapots. Then they might

0:13:52.360 --> 0:13:53.800
<v Speaker 2>have a little bit too much lead in them, and

0:13:53.800 --> 0:13:54.280
<v Speaker 2>so forth.

0:13:55.160 --> 0:13:58.360
<v Speaker 3>So in terms of how this specific Toomey dagger was

0:13:58.400 --> 0:14:02.400
<v Speaker 3>put together. The museum explains as follows quote. The tomu

0:14:02.559 --> 0:14:06.079
<v Speaker 3>was made with diverse metal working techniques. Solid casting was

0:14:06.160 --> 0:14:11.160
<v Speaker 3>used to produce the blade, the face and body, with annealing, heating, shaping,

0:14:11.200 --> 0:14:14.960
<v Speaker 3>and then cooling and repousee in which the relief design

0:14:15.040 --> 0:14:18.680
<v Speaker 3>is hammered into a mold from the reverse side. Finally,

0:14:18.760 --> 0:14:21.120
<v Speaker 3>the small ornaments around the top of the headdress were

0:14:21.160 --> 0:14:35.840
<v Speaker 3>separately hammered or cast then soldered into place. All right,

0:14:35.880 --> 0:14:40.920
<v Speaker 3>so that is the very very impressive gold ceremonial to me.

0:14:41.280 --> 0:14:42.920
<v Speaker 3>But I've got another to me for us to look at,

0:14:43.000 --> 0:14:45.360
<v Speaker 3>rob a new one. You can see the picture in

0:14:45.400 --> 0:14:48.000
<v Speaker 3>the outline here. I will describe now. This is a

0:14:48.080 --> 0:14:52.240
<v Speaker 3>later artifact from the Inca from some time between fourteen

0:14:52.360 --> 0:14:56.960
<v Speaker 3>hundred and fifteen thirty five, also from Peru, made of bronze.

0:14:57.480 --> 0:14:59.880
<v Speaker 3>This one is held by the met Museum in New York,

0:15:00.080 --> 0:15:03.080
<v Speaker 3>and it's far less elaborate than the gold knife from

0:15:03.080 --> 0:15:07.160
<v Speaker 3>the earlier Chimu culture. A sort of a simple bronze

0:15:07.200 --> 0:15:10.000
<v Speaker 3>blade curved like a slice from a circle, though it's

0:15:10.000 --> 0:15:13.400
<v Speaker 3>actually by volume less than half of the circle. You know,

0:15:13.440 --> 0:15:16.640
<v Speaker 3>it's not a semicircle. It's I don't know, by volume,

0:15:16.680 --> 0:15:18.480
<v Speaker 3>it looks like maybe a fourth of a circle, but

0:15:18.520 --> 0:15:21.400
<v Speaker 3>it's the outer edge, so it's still the curve.

0:15:21.800 --> 0:15:24.920
<v Speaker 2>Now, this one really does remind me of the pizza

0:15:24.920 --> 0:15:27.080
<v Speaker 2>slice or the bread slicer that we have in our kitchen.

0:15:27.160 --> 0:15:31.320
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah, yeah, especially because I'm sure it looks more utilitarian. Yeah,

0:15:31.360 --> 0:15:33.960
<v Speaker 3>it has less of the decoration, though it's not entirely

0:15:33.960 --> 0:15:38.840
<v Speaker 3>without decoration. So again, it's got a perpendicular handle to

0:15:38.880 --> 0:15:41.520
<v Speaker 3>the blade, and then at the end of that handle

0:15:41.640 --> 0:15:46.360
<v Speaker 3>there are four curved talons curling in like the claws

0:15:46.440 --> 0:15:49.840
<v Speaker 3>of an eagle. So the met exhibit points out the

0:15:49.920 --> 0:15:53.120
<v Speaker 3>diverse skills on display in the metal working industry that

0:15:53.160 --> 0:15:56.920
<v Speaker 3>took place at the Incan capital of Cusco, with items

0:15:56.960 --> 0:16:00.600
<v Speaker 3>being made of gold, silver, copper, and bronze, and with

0:16:00.680 --> 0:16:04.280
<v Speaker 3>Toomey's being one of the most commonly represented metal tools

0:16:04.320 --> 0:16:08.640
<v Speaker 3>from that industry. Many of these everyday Toomey's have loops

0:16:08.720 --> 0:16:10.840
<v Speaker 3>at the top of the handle. I guess kind of

0:16:10.840 --> 0:16:13.920
<v Speaker 3>like what we see here with the curved bird talons,

0:16:14.640 --> 0:16:17.160
<v Speaker 3>and this is taken as an indication that they probably

0:16:17.280 --> 0:16:19.800
<v Speaker 3>hung from something, so people might hang a to me

0:16:20.000 --> 0:16:23.120
<v Speaker 3>maybe on the necklace or on a belt something like that.

0:16:24.200 --> 0:16:29.320
<v Speaker 3>The tome is commonly associated with ritual sacrifice, for example

0:16:29.600 --> 0:16:33.520
<v Speaker 3>the sacrifice of lamas during the harvest festival, and this

0:16:33.640 --> 0:16:37.240
<v Speaker 3>association with blood sacrifice goes back thousands of years in

0:16:37.240 --> 0:16:41.640
<v Speaker 3>Indian cultures between the toomey and the animal sacrifice. The

0:16:41.720 --> 0:16:45.560
<v Speaker 3>museum explains the raptor talent motif on the handle in

0:16:45.680 --> 0:16:49.160
<v Speaker 3>terms of the association with sacrifice by saying, quote, the

0:16:49.200 --> 0:16:52.800
<v Speaker 3>eating habits of raptors and vultures give them a natural

0:16:52.840 --> 0:16:56.040
<v Speaker 3>symbolic connection to sacrifice and the world of the dead.

0:16:56.600 --> 0:16:57.720
<v Speaker 2>Okay, that makes sense.

0:16:58.080 --> 0:17:01.160
<v Speaker 3>Another thing worth noting is that the half moon tumis

0:17:01.320 --> 0:17:05.560
<v Speaker 3>are not only used by humans, at least in storytelling

0:17:05.640 --> 0:17:10.239
<v Speaker 3>and artistic representation. They are depicted in the art of

0:17:10.359 --> 0:17:14.240
<v Speaker 3>pre Incan and Deean cultures such as the Moche, the

0:17:14.320 --> 0:17:18.879
<v Speaker 3>chi Mu, and the sikhan as wielded by gods, demi,

0:17:18.920 --> 0:17:23.320
<v Speaker 3>gods and supernatural beings, sometimes threatening other beings with the

0:17:23.359 --> 0:17:27.760
<v Speaker 3>tumei or indicating that the tumei might be used for decapitation,

0:17:28.280 --> 0:17:31.680
<v Speaker 3>which also had ritual significance to multiple pre Incan cultures

0:17:31.720 --> 0:17:34.159
<v Speaker 3>of the region as an act that could bring about

0:17:34.240 --> 0:17:40.760
<v Speaker 3>agricultural and ecological rejuvenation. But earlier I mentioned that, apart

0:17:40.840 --> 0:17:44.919
<v Speaker 3>from its role in animal sacrifices and religious purposes, the

0:17:44.960 --> 0:17:50.560
<v Speaker 3>half moon shaped tume was also important in indigenous medicines,

0:17:50.640 --> 0:17:54.719
<v Speaker 3>specifically indigenous surgical techniques, including trepanation.

0:17:55.400 --> 0:17:57.960
<v Speaker 2>Oh, a topic we've covered on the show before.

0:17:58.240 --> 0:18:01.560
<v Speaker 3>Right, so we've talked about treppenne at some length. I'm

0:18:01.560 --> 0:18:03.560
<v Speaker 3>not going to do a full rehash of the whole

0:18:03.600 --> 0:18:07.360
<v Speaker 3>story here, but the short version is Trepenation is a

0:18:07.560 --> 0:18:12.400
<v Speaker 3>medical procedure practice not only in Indian cultures. Definitely in

0:18:12.400 --> 0:18:15.080
<v Speaker 3>Indian cultures, as we're going to talk about, but it

0:18:15.200 --> 0:18:17.760
<v Speaker 3>practiced in all kinds of cultures around the world all

0:18:17.800 --> 0:18:21.159
<v Speaker 3>throughout history. A very common thing. It is where a

0:18:21.359 --> 0:18:25.800
<v Speaker 3>surgeon cuts or bores or scrapes a hole in the

0:18:25.840 --> 0:18:29.040
<v Speaker 3>skull of a living person, not with the goal of

0:18:29.160 --> 0:18:32.280
<v Speaker 3>killing them, but with the goal of treating a medical

0:18:32.320 --> 0:18:37.680
<v Speaker 3>complaint or supposedly enhancing them in some way. The reasoning

0:18:37.720 --> 0:18:42.160
<v Speaker 3>behind the procedure varies, but trepienation has been used especially

0:18:42.240 --> 0:18:46.280
<v Speaker 3>to treat head injuries that might lead to swelling inside

0:18:46.280 --> 0:18:50.000
<v Speaker 3>the brain inflammation in the head. So like head injuries

0:18:50.040 --> 0:18:54.159
<v Speaker 3>that involve the fracture of the skull arising from accidents

0:18:54.240 --> 0:18:56.680
<v Speaker 3>or violence. This is a big thing that would cause

0:18:56.720 --> 0:18:59.680
<v Speaker 3>somebody to seek trepenation and maybe they get hit in

0:18:59.720 --> 0:19:02.679
<v Speaker 3>the head. There's a fracture and there's some swelling. Some

0:19:02.760 --> 0:19:05.520
<v Speaker 3>bits of bone can be removed and a hole can

0:19:05.560 --> 0:19:10.840
<v Speaker 3>be cut to allegedly relieve the swelling. It's also been

0:19:10.920 --> 0:19:14.600
<v Speaker 3>speculated that it may have been used to treat headaches,

0:19:14.720 --> 0:19:17.800
<v Speaker 3>you know, bad headaches, or other things that were thought

0:19:17.800 --> 0:19:19.840
<v Speaker 3>to be the swelling of the brain. Maybe as a

0:19:19.920 --> 0:19:23.720
<v Speaker 3>hypothetical treatment for a variety of mental and neurological conditions,

0:19:23.720 --> 0:19:28.280
<v Speaker 3>such as epilepsy. But one of the really startling things

0:19:28.400 --> 0:19:34.000
<v Speaker 3>about trepnation is in certain times and places, how often

0:19:34.080 --> 0:19:38.120
<v Speaker 3>this procedure was survivable. You know, I would just assume

0:19:38.200 --> 0:19:41.320
<v Speaker 3>that before modern medicine, this is just one hundred percent

0:19:41.400 --> 0:19:43.320
<v Speaker 3>death rate on drilling a hole in the skull.

0:19:43.960 --> 0:19:47.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, absolutely, because you hear you hear dire stories

0:19:47.040 --> 0:19:50.400
<v Speaker 2>about about other pre modern surgical procedures, and you would

0:19:50.440 --> 0:19:53.080
<v Speaker 2>just assume messing around in the skull essentially with the brain,

0:19:53.359 --> 0:19:56.600
<v Speaker 2>you're going to you're going to run up against the

0:19:56.720 --> 0:19:57.400
<v Speaker 2>high death rate.

0:19:57.840 --> 0:20:01.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And to be clear, the the survival rate of

0:20:02.119 --> 0:20:07.040
<v Speaker 3>a trepidation procedure is wildly different at different times and

0:20:07.119 --> 0:20:11.000
<v Speaker 3>places in history, so you can tell from looking at

0:20:11.119 --> 0:20:15.040
<v Speaker 3>human remains, even before written records, of how successful surgical

0:20:15.080 --> 0:20:17.960
<v Speaker 3>procedures were. You can just tell from looking at remains

0:20:18.000 --> 0:20:22.600
<v Speaker 3>of people who have had this procedure done. Sometimes bone

0:20:22.880 --> 0:20:26.399
<v Speaker 3>has healed over after a trepidation procedure, other times it

0:20:26.400 --> 0:20:29.480
<v Speaker 3>has not. But in cases where the bone has healed over,

0:20:29.640 --> 0:20:32.879
<v Speaker 3>it proves that the patient survived the operation for a

0:20:32.920 --> 0:20:38.320
<v Speaker 3>significant time afterwards, dead people don't heal, So of course

0:20:38.359 --> 0:20:40.640
<v Speaker 3>there are lots of times where you know it might

0:20:40.680 --> 0:20:43.840
<v Speaker 3>be a coin flip whether you would survive trepanation. But

0:20:44.359 --> 0:20:47.800
<v Speaker 3>some estimates based on surveys of tripand remains, indicate that

0:20:47.920 --> 0:20:52.160
<v Speaker 3>during the late Incan period they had gotten really good

0:20:52.200 --> 0:20:55.920
<v Speaker 3>at this Somewhere around eighty percent of trepanning patients probably

0:20:55.960 --> 0:20:57.040
<v Speaker 3>survived the operation.

0:20:57.560 --> 0:20:58.080
<v Speaker 2>Oh wow.

0:20:58.600 --> 0:21:00.760
<v Speaker 3>As a point of comparison, in some of the articles

0:21:00.800 --> 0:21:05.040
<v Speaker 3>I was looking at, they compared that to craniotomy similar

0:21:05.119 --> 0:21:08.040
<v Speaker 3>you know, like a removing part of the skull procedures

0:21:08.080 --> 0:21:11.399
<v Speaker 3>in field hospitals during the US Civil War, So you know,

0:21:11.520 --> 0:21:14.520
<v Speaker 3>hundreds of years later where survival rates were roughly half

0:21:14.560 --> 0:21:18.760
<v Speaker 3>of that. Oh wow, so yeah, like they had really

0:21:19.320 --> 0:21:22.440
<v Speaker 3>gotten quite good at this procedure in the late Incan period.

0:21:23.400 --> 0:21:27.960
<v Speaker 3>So what tools were used to conduct a tripanning? It

0:21:27.960 --> 0:21:29.800
<v Speaker 3>could be any number of things. You would need some

0:21:29.920 --> 0:21:32.880
<v Speaker 3>kinds of scrapers and blades, These would be any number

0:21:32.920 --> 0:21:37.440
<v Speaker 3>of obsidian or bronze implements. But the semi circular bronze

0:21:37.440 --> 0:21:41.560
<v Speaker 3>to me was absolutely a common part of the tripanning toolkit.

0:21:42.200 --> 0:21:44.919
<v Speaker 3>And this connects to an article I was reading an

0:21:45.000 --> 0:21:48.280
<v Speaker 3>ARS Technica article from twenty twenty two by Keona N.

0:21:48.320 --> 0:21:53.240
<v Speaker 3>Smith called ancient Peruvian was buried with tools for cranial

0:21:53.320 --> 0:21:57.959
<v Speaker 3>surgery and then good subheader quote. He was also buried

0:21:57.960 --> 0:22:02.480
<v Speaker 3>with the partial skulls of two former patients, taking a

0:22:02.480 --> 0:22:06.679
<v Speaker 3>little keepsake. Yeah yeah, So the article describes it was

0:22:06.720 --> 0:22:10.400
<v Speaker 3>at the time a recent discovery from a tomb excavated

0:22:11.000 --> 0:22:14.760
<v Speaker 3>in a temple complex at Waca Las Ventanas, which is

0:22:14.760 --> 0:22:18.920
<v Speaker 3>an archaeological site in Peru, and this would have been

0:22:18.960 --> 0:22:22.760
<v Speaker 3>a site from the Sican culture or the Lumbayak culture.

0:22:23.800 --> 0:22:26.400
<v Speaker 3>The body in the tomb appears to have been that

0:22:26.560 --> 0:22:31.320
<v Speaker 3>of a secon brain surgeon, a person specializing in trepanning,

0:22:32.160 --> 0:22:34.399
<v Speaker 3>and we can tell that in part because of the

0:22:34.440 --> 0:22:38.480
<v Speaker 3>tools that were buried with him. These include bronze awls

0:22:38.560 --> 0:22:43.640
<v Speaker 3>with wooden handles, needles, and blades, as well also non

0:22:43.760 --> 0:22:47.760
<v Speaker 3>occupation grave goods indicating the burial of a relatively rich

0:22:47.880 --> 0:22:51.600
<v Speaker 3>and high status person. These non occupational grave goods would

0:22:51.640 --> 0:22:55.359
<v Speaker 3>be a gold mask with feathers around the eyes, big

0:22:55.400 --> 0:23:01.280
<v Speaker 3>bronze breastplate, and copper bowls lined with gold. But specifically

0:23:01.280 --> 0:23:04.280
<v Speaker 3>addressing the Toomey, the author of this article rights quote.

0:23:04.600 --> 0:23:07.520
<v Speaker 3>Most of the knives were single edge blades, but one

0:23:07.640 --> 0:23:11.320
<v Speaker 3>was clearly special. The semi circular blade called a toume,

0:23:12.040 --> 0:23:15.440
<v Speaker 3>was a staple in both surgery and ritual sacrifice for

0:23:15.520 --> 0:23:19.320
<v Speaker 3>the Sicon. Their predecessors, the Moche and later the Inca,

0:23:19.480 --> 0:23:22.880
<v Speaker 3>ritual tomes were large and elaborate, but ancient surgeons used

0:23:22.880 --> 0:23:28.280
<v Speaker 3>a smaller, more utilitarian version for trepanation. So you might

0:23:28.320 --> 0:23:31.520
<v Speaker 3>have your big, gorgeous gold ceremonial to me that's got

0:23:31.720 --> 0:23:34.080
<v Speaker 3>the picture of a you know, a founding culture hero

0:23:34.240 --> 0:23:36.479
<v Speaker 3>on it, or you might have a smaller bronze when

0:23:36.560 --> 0:23:39.160
<v Speaker 3>that you actually used to cut holes in people's skulls.

0:23:39.640 --> 0:23:44.280
<v Speaker 3>The article here quotes Sicon National Museum Director Carlos Alera,

0:23:44.400 --> 0:23:48.320
<v Speaker 3>who says that the museum is trying to compare the

0:23:48.359 --> 0:23:51.320
<v Speaker 3>instruments found in this grave to those that would be

0:23:51.440 --> 0:23:54.880
<v Speaker 3>used by a modern surgeon. One big difference that gets

0:23:54.920 --> 0:23:57.560
<v Speaker 3>called out is material. Of course, you know modern surgeons

0:23:57.560 --> 0:24:00.720
<v Speaker 3>are going to be using modern probably steel surgical knives.

0:24:00.720 --> 0:24:03.159
<v Speaker 3>Actually I didn't even look this up. What are knives

0:24:03.240 --> 0:24:07.400
<v Speaker 3>usually made out of for surgery? I assume their steel anyway,

0:24:07.440 --> 0:24:10.840
<v Speaker 3>whatever that material would be. But these surgical knives are

0:24:10.880 --> 0:24:15.520
<v Speaker 3>made of copper with a high arsenic content. The reason

0:24:15.560 --> 0:24:18.520
<v Speaker 3>there was high arsenic content was that it helped strengthen

0:24:18.560 --> 0:24:21.560
<v Speaker 3>the metal, so like a copper arsenic alloy is stronger

0:24:21.600 --> 0:24:22.879
<v Speaker 3>than a copper one alone.

0:24:23.280 --> 0:24:25.960
<v Speaker 2>This will be interesting because we'll get back into this

0:24:26.040 --> 0:24:28.399
<v Speaker 2>and the knife we'll talk about in the second half

0:24:28.440 --> 0:24:29.359
<v Speaker 2>of this episode.

0:24:29.520 --> 0:24:32.439
<v Speaker 3>To read from the article again, quote two examples of

0:24:32.480 --> 0:24:36.560
<v Speaker 3>the surgeon's work also joined him In his grave. Archaeologists

0:24:36.560 --> 0:24:40.040
<v Speaker 3>found two frontal bones, the bone that makes up the forehead.

0:24:40.359 --> 0:24:43.080
<v Speaker 3>One belonged to an adult, one belonged to a child,

0:24:43.440 --> 0:24:46.640
<v Speaker 3>and neither originally belonged to the surgeon. His was still

0:24:46.640 --> 0:24:49.280
<v Speaker 3>attached to the rest of his skull. Both had been

0:24:49.320 --> 0:24:53.360
<v Speaker 3>carefully cut using a classic trepanation technique. So those are

0:24:53.359 --> 0:24:56.520
<v Speaker 3>the two keepsakes, you know, pieces of other people's skulls

0:24:56.560 --> 0:24:59.040
<v Speaker 3>taken with him. I wonder what that means. Is that

0:24:59.160 --> 0:25:01.240
<v Speaker 3>just like a you know, oh this is a time

0:25:01.280 --> 0:25:03.560
<v Speaker 3>I did a really good job, or well.

0:25:03.720 --> 0:25:07.159
<v Speaker 2>One wonders if they might have been teaching implements. You know,

0:25:07.200 --> 0:25:10.160
<v Speaker 2>if you're bringing your tools, maybe you're bringing your knowledge

0:25:10.160 --> 0:25:14.600
<v Speaker 2>with you. I think of how in various medical professions,

0:25:14.640 --> 0:25:19.000
<v Speaker 2>you know, you will practice using you know, some real teeth,

0:25:19.040 --> 0:25:21.480
<v Speaker 2>real bones, some sort or you know, or real other

0:25:22.200 --> 0:25:25.639
<v Speaker 2>actual pieces of a body in order to practice your craft,

0:25:25.680 --> 0:25:28.320
<v Speaker 2>and if it's not something that decays, you may keep

0:25:28.359 --> 0:25:31.480
<v Speaker 2>that potentially as a as a as a teaching implement

0:25:31.520 --> 0:25:33.320
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, maybe with something like that.

0:25:33.440 --> 0:25:35.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I could see that. I mean, I don't know

0:25:35.359 --> 0:25:37.800
<v Speaker 3>if it really work this way, but I wonder that

0:25:37.840 --> 0:25:40.200
<v Speaker 3>sort of thing would be useful, almost like tracing paper,

0:25:40.320 --> 0:25:43.040
<v Speaker 3>you know, Oh yeah, this is the kind of I mean,

0:25:43.080 --> 0:25:47.000
<v Speaker 3>I guess every every injury would be different, though I

0:25:47.040 --> 0:25:51.320
<v Speaker 3>know part of the skill of the surgeon involved here

0:25:51.320 --> 0:25:54.800
<v Speaker 3>would be knowing where and how to cut, knowing like

0:25:54.840 --> 0:25:57.040
<v Speaker 3>what the size of the cut in the skull should

0:25:57.080 --> 0:26:00.919
<v Speaker 3>be where to cut to avoid excess bleeding. You know,

0:26:00.960 --> 0:26:03.199
<v Speaker 3>these are all important things to know to help the

0:26:03.200 --> 0:26:06.919
<v Speaker 3>patient survive the procedure. And it must have been like

0:26:07.000 --> 0:26:11.280
<v Speaker 3>part of the answer of like how did these did

0:26:11.280 --> 0:26:13.720
<v Speaker 3>the late INCA period end up with these relatively high

0:26:13.760 --> 0:26:17.159
<v Speaker 3>survival rates for trepidation because again, think about these other

0:26:17.280 --> 0:26:20.359
<v Speaker 3>times when all throughout history where like maybe half the

0:26:20.400 --> 0:26:23.760
<v Speaker 3>people who did this died. The skill of the surgeon

0:26:23.880 --> 0:26:27.359
<v Speaker 3>was probably a very big deal. But another factor cited

0:26:27.520 --> 0:26:30.400
<v Speaker 3>in this article I was talking about is hygiene. They

0:26:30.720 --> 0:26:35.160
<v Speaker 3>must have somehow been practicing a relatively strong hygiene regimen

0:26:35.560 --> 0:26:39.160
<v Speaker 3>to do successful surgery without deadly infections on the regular.

0:26:39.800 --> 0:26:42.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I was wondering the same thing like that they would, Yeah,

0:26:42.600 --> 0:26:45.000
<v Speaker 2>they would have to at least lock into it, if

0:26:45.040 --> 0:26:49.000
<v Speaker 2>not make significant discoveries about what they should or be

0:26:49.040 --> 0:26:53.160
<v Speaker 2>doing before conducting you know, cranial operations.

0:26:53.400 --> 0:26:58.000
<v Speaker 3>Another interesting question is anesthesia. What did what, if anything

0:26:58.040 --> 0:27:00.240
<v Speaker 3>did they use for anesthesia? We don't really know the

0:27:00.280 --> 0:27:03.840
<v Speaker 3>answer is kind of an interesting mystery, though this article

0:27:03.920 --> 0:27:07.080
<v Speaker 3>points to a discovery within the surgeons to him at

0:27:07.359 --> 0:27:12.080
<v Speaker 3>Wacallas Fintanas that might contribute knowledge to that, and it

0:27:12.160 --> 0:27:14.760
<v Speaker 3>was that the kit that was buried with the surgeon

0:27:14.880 --> 0:27:19.920
<v Speaker 3>also included a piece of tree bark, which the curator

0:27:20.000 --> 0:27:23.960
<v Speaker 3>at that museum, Alera, had said, you know, we wonder

0:27:24.000 --> 0:27:26.400
<v Speaker 3>if this might be a medicinal bark of some kind,

0:27:26.400 --> 0:27:29.320
<v Speaker 3>because of course medicinal barks do exist. We don't know that,

0:27:29.400 --> 0:27:31.760
<v Speaker 3>to be clear, but we don't We know that there

0:27:31.760 --> 0:27:34.679
<v Speaker 3>are some medicinal barks like willow bark, of course is

0:27:34.920 --> 0:27:37.760
<v Speaker 3>anti inflammatory, and so I guess there are questions about

0:27:37.760 --> 0:27:39.800
<v Speaker 3>whether this bark might have been something like that.

0:27:40.280 --> 0:27:41.679
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean we're talking about a part of the

0:27:41.720 --> 0:27:47.320
<v Speaker 2>world that has rich biodiversity. Yeah, with any number of known,

0:27:47.680 --> 0:27:53.879
<v Speaker 2>unknown or erased, you know, examples of botanical substances that

0:27:53.920 --> 0:27:57.920
<v Speaker 2>can be used medicinally. You know what, what sort of

0:27:59.400 --> 0:28:01.960
<v Speaker 2>material to they know about that have been completely forgotten

0:28:02.040 --> 0:28:03.720
<v Speaker 2>and need to be rediscovered and so forth.

0:28:04.359 --> 0:28:08.800
<v Speaker 3>Totally, So that's the to me, unlike the dagger you

0:28:08.840 --> 0:28:11.919
<v Speaker 3>have in mind in many ways in shape and in function,

0:28:12.040 --> 0:28:14.360
<v Speaker 3>but I think still a pretty fascinating artifact.

0:28:14.880 --> 0:28:17.720
<v Speaker 2>Yes, that's a great one and definitely gets into I

0:28:17.720 --> 0:28:20.480
<v Speaker 2>think we kind of tease the idea of sacrificial blades

0:28:20.520 --> 0:28:22.400
<v Speaker 2>a little bit, and this one I think checks off

0:28:22.400 --> 0:28:35.480
<v Speaker 2>that box at least in part. All Right, the blade

0:28:35.520 --> 0:28:38.320
<v Speaker 2>that I'm going to talk about next, it is a

0:28:38.360 --> 0:28:42.360
<v Speaker 2>specific blade, and out of talking about the specific blade,

0:28:42.480 --> 0:28:45.280
<v Speaker 2>going to sort of pull out and talk more about

0:28:45.320 --> 0:28:50.320
<v Speaker 2>this style of blade in its entirety. This is one

0:28:50.400 --> 0:28:54.480
<v Speaker 2>of the blades that inspired this series that I was like, Oh,

0:28:54.560 --> 0:28:57.600
<v Speaker 2>I should really cover this, But when I started looking

0:28:57.600 --> 0:28:59.120
<v Speaker 2>at it, I realized it was just such a huge

0:28:59.160 --> 0:29:03.720
<v Speaker 2>topic because the specific blade I'm going to reference here

0:29:03.840 --> 0:29:08.440
<v Speaker 2>is a chris that is a type of traditional, highly

0:29:08.480 --> 0:29:13.960
<v Speaker 2>stylized Indonesian blade. Generally it's associated with Java, but also

0:29:14.080 --> 0:29:17.400
<v Speaker 2>other parts of Indonesia. And when I first started looking

0:29:17.400 --> 0:29:18.760
<v Speaker 2>into it, I was like, oh, this could maybe make

0:29:18.760 --> 0:29:20.520
<v Speaker 2>for a nice artifact episode, and then I was like,

0:29:20.520 --> 0:29:22.480
<v Speaker 2>oh no, there's too much here. This would have to

0:29:22.520 --> 0:29:25.720
<v Speaker 2>be at least a full episode. And then I quickly

0:29:25.760 --> 0:29:28.040
<v Speaker 2>realized like it would have to be like multiple episodes

0:29:28.080 --> 0:29:31.880
<v Speaker 2>because one is tempted to compare it to say the

0:29:31.920 --> 0:29:38.120
<v Speaker 2>Samurai sword in terms of the artistry, the technique, the history,

0:29:39.040 --> 0:29:43.160
<v Speaker 2>but in other ways it seems even more complicated than that,

0:29:43.320 --> 0:29:46.800
<v Speaker 2>because you have a lot of diverse imagery, and it's

0:29:46.840 --> 0:29:50.360
<v Speaker 2>going to depend on exactly where it was produced, when

0:29:50.360 --> 0:29:57.400
<v Speaker 2>it was produced, the details of what everything symbolizes. But

0:29:57.480 --> 0:30:00.680
<v Speaker 2>it is such a fascinating blade because you've probably seen

0:30:00.720 --> 0:30:03.720
<v Speaker 2>examples of it out there, listener, at the very least

0:30:03.880 --> 0:30:07.440
<v Speaker 2>you would recognize it. The version that is often depicted

0:30:07.520 --> 0:30:11.560
<v Speaker 2>and certainly catches the eye is a very wavy blade,

0:30:11.600 --> 0:30:18.200
<v Speaker 2>like a highly stylized almost snake shaped dagger, often with

0:30:18.240 --> 0:30:22.480
<v Speaker 2>a highly stylized hilt and a highly stylized sheath, and

0:30:22.640 --> 0:30:25.520
<v Speaker 2>just looking at it like you you know, the mind

0:30:25.680 --> 0:30:29.040
<v Speaker 2>run wild, runs wild, you know, whether you know anything

0:30:29.040 --> 0:30:32.680
<v Speaker 2>about the traditions involved here or you know, or you're

0:30:32.720 --> 0:30:35.520
<v Speaker 2>you're just coming in completely cold. You know, it's like

0:30:35.560 --> 0:30:38.320
<v Speaker 2>why is it shaped like that? And you know, why

0:30:38.440 --> 0:30:40.720
<v Speaker 2>is the handle like that? And then what are all

0:30:40.720 --> 0:30:43.600
<v Speaker 2>these little images that are a part of the blade,

0:30:44.600 --> 0:30:47.760
<v Speaker 2>So that in many ways it feels like the ultimate

0:30:47.800 --> 0:30:52.360
<v Speaker 2>transformation of a utilitarian implement of some sort of a

0:30:52.400 --> 0:30:55.800
<v Speaker 2>tool or weapon into a thing that is just pure

0:30:55.840 --> 0:30:59.160
<v Speaker 2>symbol and meaning. Though you to be clear, you still

0:30:59.160 --> 0:31:04.160
<v Speaker 2>could absolutely top somebody with one of these. So I'm

0:31:04.160 --> 0:31:06.160
<v Speaker 2>going to be talking about Chris's, but I want to

0:31:06.760 --> 0:31:12.480
<v Speaker 2>and that is generally spelled kr I S and in English.

0:31:12.520 --> 0:31:15.959
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to talk specifically though, about the Chris of Nod,

0:31:16.720 --> 0:31:19.440
<v Speaker 2>also known as the Keras of Nod because sometimes Keras

0:31:19.480 --> 0:31:23.240
<v Speaker 2>instead of Chris is used, also known as just Nod's Chris.

0:31:23.840 --> 0:31:25.440
<v Speaker 3>Take me off to the land of Nod.

0:31:25.920 --> 0:31:29.320
<v Speaker 2>Okay, let's start with the name. Who is this nod

0:31:29.440 --> 0:31:32.360
<v Speaker 2>fellow spelled k n a U D and I'm I'm

0:31:32.440 --> 0:31:35.280
<v Speaker 2>assuming I'm pronouncing that correctly. I looked around for some

0:31:35.360 --> 0:31:38.360
<v Speaker 2>pronunciation guides on this. This is a Dutch name, and

0:31:38.520 --> 0:31:41.200
<v Speaker 2>most of what I got back were either specific mentions

0:31:41.240 --> 0:31:45.240
<v Speaker 2>of this blade or insistences that I was misspelling the name,

0:31:45.320 --> 0:31:49.040
<v Speaker 2>which I'm not. In this case, Well, this was the

0:31:49.120 --> 0:31:54.000
<v Speaker 2>name of a nineteenth century Dutch physician, and his name

0:31:54.080 --> 0:31:56.280
<v Speaker 2>is only attached to the dagger in question because it

0:31:56.400 --> 0:32:00.520
<v Speaker 2>was gifted to him by paku Alum, the fifth Duke

0:32:00.800 --> 0:32:06.320
<v Speaker 2>of the Javanese Duchy of paku Aliman. The duchy still

0:32:06.520 --> 0:32:11.160
<v Speaker 2>co rules in the special region of Jagi Karta in Indonesia,

0:32:11.440 --> 0:32:14.040
<v Speaker 2>and the current Duke is Pacu Alum the tenth. The

0:32:14.160 --> 0:32:17.760
<v Speaker 2>Dutch were, of course highly invested in the region, to

0:32:17.800 --> 0:32:21.680
<v Speaker 2>say the least, first via the colonial influences of the

0:32:21.800 --> 0:32:25.440
<v Speaker 2>Dutch East India Company. The British then occupied Java from

0:32:25.480 --> 0:32:29.800
<v Speaker 2>eighteen eleven through eighteen sixteen, and the Duchy of Pacu

0:32:29.800 --> 0:32:33.320
<v Speaker 2>Aliman was established during this period, and when the Dutch

0:32:33.480 --> 0:32:37.240
<v Speaker 2>regained control of Java in eighteen sixteen, the Duchy became

0:32:37.280 --> 0:32:40.560
<v Speaker 2>an independent state of the Kingdom of the Netherlands under

0:32:40.600 --> 0:32:44.680
<v Speaker 2>the Dutch East Indies administration until Indonesia's independence in nineteen

0:32:44.720 --> 0:32:48.600
<v Speaker 2>forty five. Okay, So obviously there is a lot of

0:32:48.720 --> 0:32:54.560
<v Speaker 2>history that I just skimmed pasted really quickly. There's obviously

0:32:54.600 --> 0:32:55.840
<v Speaker 2>a lot of back and forth in a lot of

0:32:55.880 --> 0:32:58.840
<v Speaker 2>nuance there. But hopefully this gives you just an idea

0:32:59.000 --> 0:33:02.440
<v Speaker 2>of why a re old Javanese ruler would have gifted

0:33:02.440 --> 0:33:04.440
<v Speaker 2>an elaborate dagger to a dutch Man.

0:33:04.640 --> 0:33:05.000
<v Speaker 3>Okay.

0:33:05.560 --> 0:33:09.560
<v Speaker 2>Doctor Charles Nod here reportedly treated the Duke's son and

0:33:09.680 --> 0:33:13.280
<v Speaker 2>helped him overcome an illness that had some associations with

0:33:13.360 --> 0:33:17.400
<v Speaker 2>black magic, and in thanks for treating the sun and

0:33:17.560 --> 0:33:21.280
<v Speaker 2>because nod was apparently a student of Javanese mysticism, Pacu

0:33:21.320 --> 0:33:25.160
<v Speaker 2>alumn the fifth gifted him this particular Chris I included

0:33:25.640 --> 0:33:30.760
<v Speaker 2>images here of both Pacu Alum the fifth and Charles Nod.

0:33:31.080 --> 0:33:33.680
<v Speaker 2>I think you'll agree. Charles Nod in this image anyway,

0:33:33.720 --> 0:33:37.280
<v Speaker 2>absolutely looks like a haunted portrait in a haunted mansion.

0:33:37.520 --> 0:33:40.200
<v Speaker 3>I assume he's the guy on the left, yes, the

0:33:40.880 --> 0:33:44.720
<v Speaker 3>tilting his head slightly forward and looking up with his

0:33:44.840 --> 0:33:47.520
<v Speaker 3>eyes like he's doing an Aphex Twin album cover.

0:33:47.800 --> 0:33:52.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, maybe it's just a product of the scan.

0:33:52.240 --> 0:33:54.680
<v Speaker 2>I think this was I cut this out of a

0:33:54.720 --> 0:33:58.040
<v Speaker 2>book I was I was referencing. But yeah, he looks

0:33:58.040 --> 0:33:59.040
<v Speaker 2>a little creepy here.

0:33:59.000 --> 0:34:01.320
<v Speaker 3>Flake one of those pictures penny Wise in the book

0:34:01.400 --> 0:34:03.200
<v Speaker 3>that comes alive exactly.

0:34:03.600 --> 0:34:05.000
<v Speaker 2>So what does this blade look like? While there are

0:34:05.000 --> 0:34:08.640
<v Speaker 2>a lot of images online, you can look up Chris

0:34:08.640 --> 0:34:12.160
<v Speaker 2>of Nod and you can see various images for yourself.

0:34:12.520 --> 0:34:15.560
<v Speaker 2>The remains of the iron blade and the blade alone,

0:34:15.600 --> 0:34:18.120
<v Speaker 2>it lacks a hill to or a sheath, are still

0:34:18.120 --> 0:34:21.640
<v Speaker 2>covered by a thin decorative layer of copper, and it

0:34:21.719 --> 0:34:26.359
<v Speaker 2>is decorated with illustrations from the Hindu epic the Ramayana,

0:34:27.480 --> 0:34:31.160
<v Speaker 2>so one sees figures and vegetation. You can see chariots

0:34:31.200 --> 0:34:35.120
<v Speaker 2>in battle, characters from the Hindu epic and so forth.

0:34:35.440 --> 0:34:39.160
<v Speaker 2>According to author and expert David van Duran in his

0:34:39.239 --> 0:34:44.040
<v Speaker 2>book Charles Nod's Karis. Some of the identifiable elements include

0:34:44.200 --> 0:34:50.279
<v Speaker 2>the monkey warrior Hahneman, the demon king, Ravna dwarfs or

0:34:50.360 --> 0:34:55.200
<v Speaker 2>paquin Kawan. These are the like the clown dwarf servants

0:34:55.239 --> 0:34:59.040
<v Speaker 2>of the hero in Javanese puppet theater, but they're also snakes,

0:35:00.040 --> 0:35:04.320
<v Speaker 2>possibly nagas dogs. There's a demon army, there's a monkey army,

0:35:04.560 --> 0:35:06.920
<v Speaker 2>and more. I know that sounds like a lot to

0:35:07.000 --> 0:35:09.919
<v Speaker 2>fit on a single blade that again does not have

0:35:10.120 --> 0:35:14.520
<v Speaker 2>an intact hilt anymore, a Hilton handle or anything. It's

0:35:14.640 --> 0:35:16.960
<v Speaker 2>just the blade. But yes, they really do pack that

0:35:17.040 --> 0:35:22.000
<v Speaker 2>much detail into this, into this, this highly stylized blade.

0:35:22.239 --> 0:35:25.880
<v Speaker 3>It's busy, it's very busy, very Yes, it's like a

0:35:26.000 --> 0:35:27.439
<v Speaker 3>spiritual Wearswaldo.

0:35:28.040 --> 0:35:30.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. And we don't even necessarily have all of it.

0:35:30.440 --> 0:35:32.360
<v Speaker 2>There are pieces of it that have fallen away. It

0:35:32.440 --> 0:35:35.440
<v Speaker 2>is not in pristine condition by you know, any stretch.

0:35:35.520 --> 0:35:38.200
<v Speaker 2>But what we do have is absolutely remarkable, gorgeous.

0:35:38.280 --> 0:35:38.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:35:38.920 --> 0:35:41.880
<v Speaker 2>So we'll get more into just what a Chris is

0:35:41.960 --> 0:35:44.280
<v Speaker 2>here in a bit. And again this is a topic

0:35:44.280 --> 0:35:46.000
<v Speaker 2>where I'm only going to be able to really dip

0:35:46.040 --> 0:35:48.680
<v Speaker 2>our toes into it. But again, the short version is

0:35:48.719 --> 0:35:53.240
<v Speaker 2>that it's a highly decorative, highly stylized, highly symbolic dagger.

0:35:54.000 --> 0:35:57.640
<v Speaker 2>The most famous of these have wavy blades, but they're

0:35:57.640 --> 0:36:01.040
<v Speaker 2>not all wavy, some are st and the Cris of

0:36:01.160 --> 0:36:05.000
<v Speaker 2>Nod is, to be clear, a rather straight blade as well.

0:36:05.040 --> 0:36:08.120
<v Speaker 2>It does not have any of the signature waves that

0:36:08.160 --> 0:36:11.160
<v Speaker 2>are often associated with the Chris. The Cris blade has

0:36:11.200 --> 0:36:13.960
<v Speaker 2>been produced throughout the islands of Indonesia, but they're especially

0:36:14.000 --> 0:36:19.040
<v Speaker 2>prominent in Java, also prominent to a degree in Bali

0:36:19.080 --> 0:36:24.400
<v Speaker 2>as well. So the history of this particular Chris roughly

0:36:24.440 --> 0:36:26.640
<v Speaker 2>breaks down as fall. These are some of the main

0:36:28.040 --> 0:36:32.080
<v Speaker 2>the main points in its known history, so according to

0:36:32.120 --> 0:36:35.440
<v Speaker 2>an inscription on the blade itself, it was forged in

0:36:35.560 --> 0:36:40.080
<v Speaker 2>at least thirteen forty two CE. This would make it

0:36:40.239 --> 0:36:46.000
<v Speaker 2>a product of the Majapahi Empire, a Hindu Buddhist empire

0:36:46.000 --> 0:36:50.799
<v Speaker 2>that ruled Java in some surrounding territory, ultimately lasting from

0:36:51.160 --> 0:36:54.239
<v Speaker 2>twelve ninety two through fifteen twenty seven, when it was

0:36:54.280 --> 0:36:58.360
<v Speaker 2>conquered by the Demak Sultanate. This was just a little

0:36:58.760 --> 0:37:02.160
<v Speaker 2>more than a decade fallollowing first contact in this region

0:37:02.160 --> 0:37:05.880
<v Speaker 2>with Europeans. I believe it would have been the Portuguese.

0:37:06.000 --> 0:37:08.319
<v Speaker 2>Then at a much later date it is gifted to

0:37:08.400 --> 0:37:11.480
<v Speaker 2>Charles Nod and this would have been the late eighteen hundreds,

0:37:11.920 --> 0:37:14.520
<v Speaker 2>and then it was presumed lost around nineteen oh three,

0:37:15.000 --> 0:37:18.279
<v Speaker 2>but it apparently remained in the family's possession in Indonesia,

0:37:18.640 --> 0:37:21.640
<v Speaker 2>was hidden during the Japanese occupation that's forty two through

0:37:21.680 --> 0:37:24.560
<v Speaker 2>forty five, and then the family took the blade to

0:37:24.600 --> 0:37:28.760
<v Speaker 2>the Netherlands during the Indonesian National Revolution that immediately followed,

0:37:29.000 --> 0:37:32.000
<v Speaker 2>and it remains to this day time to understand in

0:37:32.040 --> 0:37:38.080
<v Speaker 2>Amsterdam's kit Royal Tropical Institute. So this blade is apparently

0:37:38.160 --> 0:37:43.759
<v Speaker 2>the oldest surviving Chris that has a verifiable age. So

0:37:43.920 --> 0:37:46.600
<v Speaker 2>again that's not to say this is definitely the oldest,

0:37:46.760 --> 0:37:49.320
<v Speaker 2>like may there are other blades that may be older,

0:37:49.960 --> 0:37:53.640
<v Speaker 2>but this is the one that currently has a verifiable

0:37:53.640 --> 0:37:56.360
<v Speaker 2>age according to most experts.

0:37:56.920 --> 0:38:00.200
<v Speaker 3>Very helpful that its origins are actually inscribed on it.

0:38:00.840 --> 0:38:02.640
<v Speaker 2>Right or it's thought that this is the origin dat.

0:38:02.640 --> 0:38:05.120
<v Speaker 2>I've also read that it's possible that it's older, but

0:38:05.400 --> 0:38:08.080
<v Speaker 2>given that the dates on there, or at least in

0:38:08.120 --> 0:38:10.640
<v Speaker 2>some form is on there, it would mean okay, it

0:38:10.680 --> 0:38:12.560
<v Speaker 2>has to be at least this old. Maybe it's older,

0:38:12.600 --> 0:38:15.640
<v Speaker 2>but this it has to be this old, okay. And

0:38:15.840 --> 0:38:17.600
<v Speaker 2>now I have to admit I was a bit dubious

0:38:17.760 --> 0:38:21.120
<v Speaker 2>of this claim at first, again knowing nothing about this previously,

0:38:21.520 --> 0:38:24.560
<v Speaker 2>you know, could the oldest surviving example of this tradition

0:38:24.719 --> 0:38:27.279
<v Speaker 2>really have been given away to a foreigner as a

0:38:27.320 --> 0:38:30.879
<v Speaker 2>gift and eventually sent away to a European museum. As

0:38:30.880 --> 0:38:33.200
<v Speaker 2>it turns out, though, there seems to be a case

0:38:33.400 --> 0:38:35.520
<v Speaker 2>for this, a strong case for this, for a few

0:38:35.560 --> 0:38:39.640
<v Speaker 2>different reasons, and with a few different caveats For starters,

0:38:39.680 --> 0:38:43.200
<v Speaker 2>there's the base fact that we're dealing with iron based artifacts,

0:38:43.200 --> 0:38:45.520
<v Speaker 2>and some of these I should also mention to call

0:38:45.640 --> 0:38:49.239
<v Speaker 2>back to an episode we did previously. Sometimes they use

0:38:49.520 --> 0:38:53.600
<v Speaker 2>meteoric iron in these artifacts as well, But at any rate,

0:38:53.680 --> 0:38:57.000
<v Speaker 2>we were talking iron based artifacts in a humid tropical climate.

0:38:57.520 --> 0:39:00.840
<v Speaker 2>So if a blade is not properly protected, it's just

0:39:00.840 --> 0:39:03.839
<v Speaker 2>going to naturally deteriorate. Also, as we see in other

0:39:03.920 --> 0:39:07.000
<v Speaker 2>blade cultures, such as that of the Samurai sword, the

0:39:07.000 --> 0:39:10.200
<v Speaker 2>blade itself was considered the most important and the most

0:39:10.200 --> 0:39:15.480
<v Speaker 2>sacred part, and additional parts such as hill sheath so forth,

0:39:15.960 --> 0:39:19.240
<v Speaker 2>these were interchangeable and so they might change multiple times

0:39:19.320 --> 0:39:23.080
<v Speaker 2>during the lifetime of a particular blade, and this can

0:39:23.120 --> 0:39:28.000
<v Speaker 2>apparently complicate accurate datings of a blade as well. And then,

0:39:28.040 --> 0:39:31.200
<v Speaker 2>as our brief history overview might have suggested to listeners

0:39:31.239 --> 0:39:33.680
<v Speaker 2>were also dealing with the region, they saw a great

0:39:33.680 --> 0:39:37.600
<v Speaker 2>deal of upheaval during the colonial period. You had the

0:39:37.680 --> 0:39:41.399
<v Speaker 2>Dutch East India Company, the British and the French were

0:39:41.400 --> 0:39:44.959
<v Speaker 2>also involved at different points, and the ensuing conflicts also

0:39:45.000 --> 0:39:49.480
<v Speaker 2>pitted various factions against each other. Artifacts were destroyed, lost,

0:39:49.880 --> 0:39:54.200
<v Speaker 2>absconded with, sometimes into private collections. Also, you had blades

0:39:54.239 --> 0:39:57.040
<v Speaker 2>that were just outright and neglected. And all of this,

0:39:57.280 --> 0:40:00.759
<v Speaker 2>as we've seen with various cultures impacted by colonialism, led

0:40:00.760 --> 0:40:04.560
<v Speaker 2>to a great deal of cultural loss, including material loss.

0:40:05.640 --> 0:40:09.040
<v Speaker 2>So the fact that the Chris of Nod could survive

0:40:09.120 --> 0:40:13.960
<v Speaker 2>six centuries despite all of this is generally quite remarkable, again,

0:40:14.080 --> 0:40:17.200
<v Speaker 2>especially given all the pivotal moments in its timeline where

0:40:17.200 --> 0:40:18.759
<v Speaker 2>it could have just been lost, it could have just

0:40:18.800 --> 0:40:22.719
<v Speaker 2>remained buried, it could have been more neglected than it was.

0:40:23.440 --> 0:40:27.000
<v Speaker 2>So apparently we're rather lucky to have this one at all. Now,

0:40:27.200 --> 0:40:29.279
<v Speaker 2>at this point, I want to back up a little

0:40:29.280 --> 0:40:31.560
<v Speaker 2>bit sort of widen and talk a little more generally

0:40:31.640 --> 0:40:36.440
<v Speaker 2>about the chris as a type of blade. One of

0:40:36.440 --> 0:40:39.680
<v Speaker 2>the main sources I turned to for this, in addition

0:40:39.760 --> 0:40:44.200
<v Speaker 2>to the aforementioned book, is Introduction to Chris, a Traditional

0:40:44.200 --> 0:40:49.480
<v Speaker 2>Weapon of Indonesia Preserved Lingering Issues of Facts by Purwatou

0:40:49.960 --> 0:40:54.879
<v Speaker 2>and Nurhamada, published in twenty twenty one in the Indonesian

0:40:54.960 --> 0:40:58.839
<v Speaker 2>Journal of English Educational Literature and Culture. So the name

0:40:58.960 --> 0:41:04.240
<v Speaker 2>Chris or sometimes keras this is apparently this apparently stems

0:41:04.239 --> 0:41:08.200
<v Speaker 2>from an older Javanese word that meant to slice, and

0:41:09.160 --> 0:41:13.640
<v Speaker 2>the blade is again often identified by its highly asymmetrical design.

0:41:14.280 --> 0:41:18.160
<v Speaker 2>Generally it's stylized hilt and sheath and in some cases

0:41:18.239 --> 0:41:21.840
<v Speaker 2>that wavy snake like blade. Again, not every Chris is wavy,

0:41:21.880 --> 0:41:24.480
<v Speaker 2>but many are. And it's one of those things like

0:41:24.480 --> 0:41:26.160
<v Speaker 2>if you pull up like a Wikipedia article about it,

0:41:26.239 --> 0:41:28.480
<v Speaker 2>you're gonna you're definitely gonna see images, or you just

0:41:28.520 --> 0:41:31.359
<v Speaker 2>do an image search for Chris, you're going to see

0:41:31.400 --> 0:41:34.600
<v Speaker 2>that wavy blade almost saw Like I guess.

0:41:34.480 --> 0:41:37.520
<v Speaker 3>If you if you're looking at an image, I would

0:41:37.520 --> 0:41:39.760
<v Speaker 3>say it almost suggests you're looking at it through water.

0:41:40.080 --> 0:41:43.200
<v Speaker 3>The rippling back and forth of the blade the way

0:41:43.280 --> 0:41:45.000
<v Speaker 3>the way it often looks. But yeah, like you said,

0:41:45.040 --> 0:41:46.759
<v Speaker 3>this one does not have that appearance.

0:41:47.000 --> 0:41:50.080
<v Speaker 2>The water ripple comparison, I think is really apt considering

0:41:50.120 --> 0:41:52.960
<v Speaker 2>the amount of skill that went into creating these, and

0:41:53.000 --> 0:41:55.120
<v Speaker 2>so there is that kind of precision that you get,

0:41:55.160 --> 0:41:58.799
<v Speaker 2>that wave like precision. Even more so, like I think

0:41:58.800 --> 0:42:02.000
<v Speaker 2>the snake comparison is all so really important. But yeah,

0:42:02.160 --> 0:42:07.560
<v Speaker 2>way like water ripples, that's nice. And also the snake,

0:42:07.680 --> 0:42:11.440
<v Speaker 2>the naga is also associated with water, so that's that's

0:42:11.440 --> 0:42:24.000
<v Speaker 2>a solid comparison as well. So it's said that the

0:42:24.000 --> 0:42:27.640
<v Speaker 2>blade was originally a close combat weapon that was treated

0:42:27.719 --> 0:42:33.240
<v Speaker 2>with poison. The poison here was known as warrengon, also

0:42:33.360 --> 0:42:38.439
<v Speaker 2>known as arsenic. Oh yeah, And the interesting bit here

0:42:38.480 --> 0:42:39.799
<v Speaker 2>is that we have there seemed to be a couple

0:42:39.840 --> 0:42:42.600
<v Speaker 2>of different dimensions to this. So on one hand, there

0:42:42.680 --> 0:42:46.040
<v Speaker 2>was the idea, Okay, the blade is ritually treated with

0:42:46.239 --> 0:42:50.719
<v Speaker 2>this arsenic, but apparently like not a situation where like, okay,

0:42:50.760 --> 0:42:53.440
<v Speaker 2>you're going into battle rubs some arsenic on the blade. No,

0:42:53.520 --> 0:42:57.040
<v Speaker 2>the arsenic is used in the creation of the blade,

0:42:58.520 --> 0:43:02.840
<v Speaker 2>treatment of the blades tip, it's forging, and this process

0:43:02.840 --> 0:43:05.840
<v Speaker 2>would bring out the contrast apparently between the dark black

0:43:05.920 --> 0:43:09.680
<v Speaker 2>iron and the light colored silvery nickel layers.

0:43:10.280 --> 0:43:12.719
<v Speaker 3>So my understanding that right, is saying that you could

0:43:12.760 --> 0:43:17.040
<v Speaker 3>put a poison, a permanent poisonous element into the metal

0:43:17.080 --> 0:43:19.520
<v Speaker 3>when it was forged, and that would still be effective

0:43:19.520 --> 0:43:22.719
<v Speaker 3>as a poison for somebody getting cut by it. I

0:43:22.800 --> 0:43:26.799
<v Speaker 3>don't so it just seems kind of hard to believe chemically, right.

0:43:26.920 --> 0:43:29.680
<v Speaker 2>I think it's more of a supernatural idea of the

0:43:29.680 --> 0:43:33.280
<v Speaker 2>poison here, because again we're getting into we're talking about

0:43:33.880 --> 0:43:36.160
<v Speaker 2>an implement that is it's almost like a blessing of

0:43:36.200 --> 0:43:39.319
<v Speaker 2>the blade. That's my understanding of it here. I might

0:43:39.400 --> 0:43:41.400
<v Speaker 2>have to come back and see if there are sources

0:43:41.440 --> 0:43:45.080
<v Speaker 2>out there that really get into the possibility of any

0:43:45.160 --> 0:43:49.920
<v Speaker 2>kind of like permanently poisoned blade. But that's one of

0:43:49.960 --> 0:43:52.160
<v Speaker 2>the interesting things about poison. We just discussed this on

0:43:52.200 --> 0:43:54.759
<v Speaker 2>the show before in the past, talking about poisons and

0:43:54.840 --> 0:44:02.600
<v Speaker 2>various East Asian belief systems, where yes, there were definitely

0:44:02.600 --> 0:44:07.160
<v Speaker 2>real poisons then as there are today, but poison also

0:44:07.239 --> 0:44:12.560
<v Speaker 2>takes on the connotation of curse, and not only curse,

0:44:12.600 --> 0:44:15.399
<v Speaker 2>but sort of like accusations of poison, and we see

0:44:15.400 --> 0:44:18.400
<v Speaker 2>this in belief systems throughout the world, like the idea

0:44:18.480 --> 0:44:23.200
<v Speaker 2>that if something evil has happened, illness or or something else,

0:44:23.760 --> 0:44:26.760
<v Speaker 2>it must be a poison that was used by evil doers,

0:44:27.440 --> 0:44:30.120
<v Speaker 2>the poisons of witches. So the poisons and curses of

0:44:30.239 --> 0:44:33.440
<v Speaker 2>magic users are kind of interchangeable, and therefore we might

0:44:33.480 --> 0:44:36.600
<v Speaker 2>think of this as kind of like a holy poison

0:44:36.640 --> 0:44:39.640
<v Speaker 2>in some respects a wholly magical poison.

0:44:39.960 --> 0:44:40.520
<v Speaker 3>Interesting.

0:44:41.080 --> 0:44:44.320
<v Speaker 2>Now, again, the Chris, like other long lived ceremonial knives,

0:44:44.400 --> 0:44:48.560
<v Speaker 2>is highly symbolic. Every detail of the blade often grounded

0:44:48.600 --> 0:44:51.240
<v Speaker 2>in some sort of function, such as the blood gutters,

0:44:51.280 --> 0:44:54.160
<v Speaker 2>which I think we've pointed this out on the show before.

0:44:54.160 --> 0:44:58.280
<v Speaker 2>Blood gutters are not actually for allowing blood to blurt

0:44:58.280 --> 0:45:00.600
<v Speaker 2>out of a wound there, it's about reducing blade weight,

0:45:01.120 --> 0:45:05.960
<v Speaker 2>you know, things like that, or again this specially treated

0:45:06.000 --> 0:45:09.800
<v Speaker 2>blade tip. They take on various religious and philosophical meanings.

0:45:10.160 --> 0:45:13.880
<v Speaker 2>For example, the shape of the blade apparently has different meanings.

0:45:14.280 --> 0:45:17.719
<v Speaker 2>The wavy blade symbolizes wisdom and is linked to the

0:45:17.880 --> 0:45:21.640
<v Speaker 2>iconography of the serpent Naga in motion. And furthermore, the

0:45:21.719 --> 0:45:25.120
<v Speaker 2>exact number of curves in the blade is tied to

0:45:25.200 --> 0:45:29.680
<v Speaker 2>precise ideas about theology and power. Ones in the relationship

0:45:29.680 --> 0:45:32.480
<v Speaker 2>between kings and the gods, that sort of thing. In

0:45:32.520 --> 0:45:35.920
<v Speaker 2>that paper publishing the Journal of English Educational Literature and Culture,

0:45:35.960 --> 0:45:38.800
<v Speaker 2>there's like a whole chart of like, okay, two waves

0:45:38.840 --> 0:45:41.439
<v Speaker 2>it means this, three waves it means that, and they're

0:45:41.480 --> 0:45:45.760
<v Speaker 2>all They're all very to my eye complex ideas about

0:45:45.960 --> 0:45:50.960
<v Speaker 2>again the theology of the theological properties of power. The

0:45:51.040 --> 0:45:53.200
<v Speaker 2>straight Cris blade, on the other hand, is said to

0:45:53.200 --> 0:45:58.239
<v Speaker 2>symbolize determination to maintain principles, and it's tied to the

0:45:58.280 --> 0:46:01.600
<v Speaker 2>idea of the Naga at rest. So the Naga is

0:46:01.600 --> 0:46:04.640
<v Speaker 2>not moving, it's not waving, you know, it's not slithering,

0:46:05.000 --> 0:46:09.239
<v Speaker 2>but it is straight. The exact period of production is

0:46:09.280 --> 0:46:12.040
<v Speaker 2>also going to dictate exactly how one might read a

0:46:12.160 --> 0:46:14.719
<v Speaker 2>Chris like this, And this is again not even getting

0:46:14.760 --> 0:46:19.920
<v Speaker 2>to all the various outright illustrations and inscriptions are going

0:46:19.960 --> 0:46:22.799
<v Speaker 2>to be on the blade as well. One example of

0:46:22.840 --> 0:46:27.920
<v Speaker 2>the differences you encounter. So if it was created within

0:46:27.960 --> 0:46:30.799
<v Speaker 2>a Hindu Buddhist culture, you're going to have, you know,

0:46:30.840 --> 0:46:34.279
<v Speaker 2>you probably have a lot more illustrations of gods and

0:46:34.320 --> 0:46:39.160
<v Speaker 2>beings and animals. Meanwhile, Islamic cultures, as you can well imagine,

0:46:39.440 --> 0:46:42.360
<v Speaker 2>under Islamic cultures, you're going to have Islamic crises that

0:46:42.440 --> 0:46:44.560
<v Speaker 2>typically employ fewer of these elements.

0:46:45.080 --> 0:46:48.040
<v Speaker 3>Let's representation a m. Yeah.

0:46:48.280 --> 0:46:51.120
<v Speaker 2>Now, another tidbit I ran across is this idea, and

0:46:51.120 --> 0:46:53.880
<v Speaker 2>this has been referenced in multiple works that a long

0:46:54.040 --> 0:46:57.600
<v Speaker 2>form of the straight chris was also reportedly used in

0:46:57.719 --> 0:47:02.520
<v Speaker 2>ritual executions or Hu Kuman saloon. And this would have

0:47:02.560 --> 0:47:09.040
<v Speaker 2>been achieved allegedly by having the execution victim assume a

0:47:09.080 --> 0:47:13.240
<v Speaker 2>squatting position, and then the executioner stands behind the victim

0:47:13.680 --> 0:47:17.360
<v Speaker 2>and then would drive the crisp down through the clavicle

0:47:17.480 --> 0:47:20.520
<v Speaker 2>to the heart. I mean, that's what I said. All

0:47:21.719 --> 0:47:25.360
<v Speaker 2>most of these execution techniques, I don't know. I couldn't find.

0:47:25.920 --> 0:47:29.600
<v Speaker 2>I didn't find any papers that like really dug into

0:47:30.239 --> 0:47:32.880
<v Speaker 2>how effective this would be. But I guess on paper,

0:47:33.040 --> 0:47:35.239
<v Speaker 2>if someone's like, hey, this guy knows what he's doing.

0:47:35.280 --> 0:47:36.959
<v Speaker 2>He's going to stick it right through your neck straight

0:47:37.000 --> 0:47:39.200
<v Speaker 2>to the heart and then it's done, I guess I'm

0:47:39.239 --> 0:47:41.520
<v Speaker 2>okay with that. Certainly better than some of the horror

0:47:41.520 --> 0:47:47.680
<v Speaker 2>stories we've discussed involving multiple strikes of the headman's axe. Right. Yes, Now,

0:47:47.680 --> 0:47:50.879
<v Speaker 2>this does lead me to another issue that comes up.

0:47:50.960 --> 0:47:54.600
<v Speaker 2>There are some arguments that that curvy wavy blade, the

0:47:54.640 --> 0:47:58.120
<v Speaker 2>snake like blade, the snake in motion, that this would

0:47:58.120 --> 0:48:01.880
<v Speaker 2>be an ideal blade because it might produce a wider

0:48:01.960 --> 0:48:06.319
<v Speaker 2>wound channel when it's actually used in battle, or that

0:48:06.480 --> 0:48:10.040
<v Speaker 2>you would encounter less friction and suction inside the wound,

0:48:10.200 --> 0:48:12.799
<v Speaker 2>so allowing for like a deeper and faster stab, like

0:48:12.840 --> 0:48:14.279
<v Speaker 2>you'd be able to stab in and then pull it

0:48:14.320 --> 0:48:17.239
<v Speaker 2>back out, save time and then you can move on

0:48:17.239 --> 0:48:20.600
<v Speaker 2>to your in the next battlefield stabbing that sort of thing.

0:48:21.360 --> 0:48:23.120
<v Speaker 2>As far as I can tell, a lot of these

0:48:23.200 --> 0:48:26.080
<v Speaker 2>arguments seem to be kind of speculative. I couldn't find

0:48:26.080 --> 0:48:28.440
<v Speaker 2>an example of anyone like actually testing them out on

0:48:28.600 --> 0:48:32.319
<v Speaker 2>some sort of you know, you know, cadaver or animal body.

0:48:32.719 --> 0:48:34.320
<v Speaker 3>Though, stick dummy with the Chris.

0:48:34.480 --> 0:48:36.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. But if if one does, and certainly if anybody

0:48:36.960 --> 0:48:38.520
<v Speaker 2>knows of one out there, send it my way and

0:48:38.560 --> 0:48:43.000
<v Speaker 2>we'll come back to the topic. So these ideas, though

0:48:43.000 --> 0:48:44.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm not going to dismiss them out of hand, could

0:48:44.960 --> 0:48:49.280
<v Speaker 2>be true, but most accounts really seem to focus on again,

0:48:49.400 --> 0:48:52.400
<v Speaker 2>all of these stylistic and symbolic meanings of say the

0:48:52.480 --> 0:48:55.799
<v Speaker 2>curvy blade, and I mean you can kind of get

0:48:55.800 --> 0:48:58.200
<v Speaker 2>this too by just looking at it. It just it

0:48:58.320 --> 0:49:01.640
<v Speaker 2>just you know, enraptures you to look at a curvy Chris.

0:49:02.239 --> 0:49:05.400
<v Speaker 2>So it seems more likely that these that it's a

0:49:05.480 --> 0:49:08.600
<v Speaker 2>you know, a major esthetic factor here rather than a

0:49:08.600 --> 0:49:13.320
<v Speaker 2>performance design. Yeah, finally, this is this is a somewhat

0:49:13.400 --> 0:49:16.479
<v Speaker 2>lesser cultural value. But if you listen to our Weird

0:49:16.480 --> 0:49:19.160
<v Speaker 2>House Cinema episodes, you might remember a few months back

0:49:19.200 --> 0:49:22.800
<v Speaker 2>we discussed the nineteen eighty eight Indonesian supernatural action movie

0:49:23.080 --> 0:49:27.760
<v Speaker 2>Lady Terminator. That film does feature a holy demon slaying

0:49:27.840 --> 0:49:31.359
<v Speaker 2>Chris in it, which I think, you know, again that's

0:49:31.400 --> 0:49:36.480
<v Speaker 2>a that's an exploitation action film, but it does give

0:49:36.520 --> 0:49:39.040
<v Speaker 2>you an idea of just how important the Chris is

0:49:39.520 --> 0:49:42.920
<v Speaker 2>within these different Indonesian traditions, like it is the holy blade,

0:49:42.960 --> 0:49:44.799
<v Speaker 2>it is the of course, it is the blade that

0:49:44.800 --> 0:49:48.280
<v Speaker 2>you would use to eliminate some sort of supernatural evil.

0:49:48.520 --> 0:49:51.000
<v Speaker 3>Do I remember right that in that movie there is

0:49:51.040 --> 0:49:54.480
<v Speaker 3>a snake or an eel that turns into the Chris.

0:49:54.520 --> 0:49:57.440
<v Speaker 2>You were correct, Yeah, and that would also tie into

0:49:57.560 --> 0:50:01.160
<v Speaker 2>these ideas of the cur rev blade or even the

0:50:01.160 --> 0:50:04.600
<v Speaker 2>straight blade again being connected to a snake or a naga.

0:50:05.320 --> 0:50:10.640
<v Speaker 2>So and again, and also to water and to water creatures,

0:50:11.320 --> 0:50:14.600
<v Speaker 2>the wavy movement and wave forms in the water.

0:50:15.239 --> 0:50:17.280
<v Speaker 3>Well done, mythologically valid.

0:50:17.880 --> 0:50:20.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah yeah, so again, there is so much out there

0:50:20.680 --> 0:50:23.920
<v Speaker 2>about about the Chris. You know, whole books have been

0:50:23.960 --> 0:50:27.320
<v Speaker 2>written about it. And in fact, the one author, the

0:50:27.920 --> 0:50:31.560
<v Speaker 2>Dutch author that I alluded to here, David von Duren,

0:50:31.640 --> 0:50:34.960
<v Speaker 2>has written multiple books about the Chris. Some of them

0:50:34.960 --> 0:50:36.759
<v Speaker 2>aren't as easy to get a hold of, but they're

0:50:36.760 --> 0:50:38.359
<v Speaker 2>out there. I think you generally have to like order

0:50:38.400 --> 0:50:44.480
<v Speaker 2>them from Amsterdam. But again, deep topic. I didn't want

0:50:44.520 --> 0:50:46.440
<v Speaker 2>to just go on and on about the Chris here,

0:50:46.719 --> 0:50:49.759
<v Speaker 2>but hopefully I've given you just a sample of just

0:50:49.840 --> 0:50:52.839
<v Speaker 2>how rich and amazing these blades are.

0:50:53.320 --> 0:50:57.000
<v Speaker 3>Very cool. This is not something I think about most blades.

0:50:57.040 --> 0:50:59.880
<v Speaker 3>You know, you ever see the scene in a lot,

0:51:00.000 --> 0:51:02.719
<v Speaker 3>don't know the story where the sword expert it like,

0:51:02.760 --> 0:51:04.440
<v Speaker 3>picks it up and wants to feel the edge of

0:51:04.480 --> 0:51:06.680
<v Speaker 3>the blade. They like put their thumb on the sharp part,

0:51:06.680 --> 0:51:09.080
<v Speaker 3>And I don't know what. I don't have that impulse

0:51:09.080 --> 0:51:10.759
<v Speaker 3>with knives. I mean, I like a good knife in

0:51:10.800 --> 0:51:13.279
<v Speaker 3>the kitchen. I'm a fan of good knives, but I

0:51:13.320 --> 0:51:15.439
<v Speaker 3>don't always want to go touching the blade to feel

0:51:15.480 --> 0:51:17.960
<v Speaker 3>how sharp it is, Chris, for some reason like I

0:51:18.000 --> 0:51:20.520
<v Speaker 3>want to get my hands on that. I want to

0:51:20.560 --> 0:51:22.880
<v Speaker 3>put that right on the pad of my thumb and

0:51:22.920 --> 0:51:24.040
<v Speaker 3>see how sharp it feels.

0:51:24.480 --> 0:51:28.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Yeah, it is something about the how organic it looks.

0:51:28.840 --> 0:51:31.840
<v Speaker 2>It looks like a living thing, And I believe that

0:51:31.920 --> 0:51:33.879
<v Speaker 2>is part like there is an idea that they are

0:51:33.960 --> 0:51:35.920
<v Speaker 2>kind of like living things, you know, the idea that

0:51:36.040 --> 0:51:38.920
<v Speaker 2>is kind of getting back to what we discussed in

0:51:38.960 --> 0:51:43.040
<v Speaker 2>the first episode what Borges said about knives and especially

0:51:43.160 --> 0:51:46.360
<v Speaker 2>weapons of that have shed blood. How they kind of

0:51:46.360 --> 0:51:47.960
<v Speaker 2>take on a life of their own, and they have

0:51:48.040 --> 0:51:53.680
<v Speaker 2>their own their own ambitions and their own grudges, and

0:51:53.760 --> 0:51:57.080
<v Speaker 2>we as mortal humans just we occasionally get to hold them,

0:51:57.120 --> 0:52:00.760
<v Speaker 2>We occasionally wield them. We occasionally rub our thumb against

0:52:00.760 --> 0:52:02.359
<v Speaker 2>their edge to see how sharp they are.

0:52:02.880 --> 0:52:05.600
<v Speaker 3>They must seek out a meat host to carry them along.

0:52:05.960 --> 0:52:09.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, all right, we're gonna close out this episode. But

0:52:09.719 --> 0:52:11.799
<v Speaker 2>Joe and I were just talking about this off mic,

0:52:12.040 --> 0:52:15.920
<v Speaker 2>I believe we have one more episode in this series

0:52:15.960 --> 0:52:18.320
<v Speaker 2>for you. We're gonna reach into the into the blade

0:52:18.360 --> 0:52:19.920
<v Speaker 2>drawer one more time and.

0:52:20.520 --> 0:52:23.360
<v Speaker 3>Greet into that bag of books. If there's a Chris

0:52:23.360 --> 0:52:24.000
<v Speaker 3>in there.

0:52:24.080 --> 0:52:26.799
<v Speaker 2>See what see what pricks us, and we're gonna pull

0:52:26.800 --> 0:52:30.200
<v Speaker 2>out at least two more. We'll see. We'll see what

0:52:30.239 --> 0:52:32.239
<v Speaker 2>they're like once we actually get our hands on them

0:52:32.320 --> 0:52:36.080
<v Speaker 2>and start to rubbing our thumb against the blade. So

0:52:36.120 --> 0:52:39.239
<v Speaker 2>tune in on Thursday for what should probably be the

0:52:39.239 --> 0:52:42.919
<v Speaker 2>final episode in this three part series. But in the meantime, again,

0:52:42.960 --> 0:52:44.440
<v Speaker 2>we'd love to hear from you out there. Do you

0:52:44.520 --> 0:52:49.480
<v Speaker 2>have expertise or information about either of the blades and

0:52:49.560 --> 0:52:52.399
<v Speaker 2>blade types that we discussed here today, If so, write

0:52:52.440 --> 0:52:55.080
<v Speaker 2>in we'd love to hear from you. Or if you

0:52:55.200 --> 0:53:01.480
<v Speaker 2>just have blades that are of personal cultural importance to

0:53:01.560 --> 0:53:04.919
<v Speaker 2>you and you would like to share them with us. Yeah,

0:53:05.080 --> 0:53:07.680
<v Speaker 2>send us your story, send us some pictures of that night.

0:53:08.360 --> 0:53:09.440
<v Speaker 2>We would love to hear from you.

0:53:09.840 --> 0:53:13.840
<v Speaker 3>Huge thanks as always to our excellent audio producer JJ Posway.

0:53:14.280 --> 0:53:15.920
<v Speaker 3>If you would like to get in touch with us

0:53:15.920 --> 0:53:18.480
<v Speaker 3>with feedback on this episode or any other, to suggest

0:53:18.520 --> 0:53:20.560
<v Speaker 3>a topic for the future, or just to say hello,

0:53:20.680 --> 0:53:23.440
<v Speaker 3>you can email us at contact stuff to Blow your

0:53:23.520 --> 0:53:31.600
<v Speaker 3>Mind dot com.

0:53:31.760 --> 0:53:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Stuff to Blow Your Mind is production of iHeartRadio. For

0:53:34.760 --> 0:53:37.560
<v Speaker 1>more podcasts from my Heart Radio, visit the iHeartRadio app,

0:53:37.719 --> 0:53:55.120
<v Speaker 1>Apple podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.