WEBVTT - 04/22/21 DPS Hour 3 Matt Maiocco

0:00:00.680 --> 0:00:03.480
<v Speaker 1>You are listening to the Dan Patrick Show on Fox

0:00:03.560 --> 0:00:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio. I am here to help amed free in

0:00:06.720 --> 0:00:09.720
<v Speaker 1>for Dan Patrick on the Dan Patrick Show. It is

0:00:09.800 --> 0:00:12.959
<v Speaker 1>April twenties second. You can email us at DP at

0:00:13.000 --> 0:00:14.920
<v Speaker 1>dan Patrick dot com. You can go to Dan Patrick

0:00:14.960 --> 0:00:20.600
<v Speaker 1>dot com or at DP show on Twitter. They've had

0:00:20.600 --> 0:00:23.759
<v Speaker 1>a lot so far, covered a lot of ground, as

0:00:23.760 --> 0:00:26.560
<v Speaker 1>they say. We talked to Ben Voland writes about the

0:00:26.680 --> 0:00:29.000
<v Speaker 1>NFL for the Boston Globe. Talked about some of the

0:00:29.040 --> 0:00:34.640
<v Speaker 1>new rule changes. Nothing real major out there, but NFL

0:00:34.760 --> 0:00:37.760
<v Speaker 1>stopping just short of going to a sky judge. They

0:00:37.800 --> 0:00:39.800
<v Speaker 1>will get someone up in the booth to nudge the

0:00:39.840 --> 0:00:45.680
<v Speaker 1>officials in certain directions, just to nudge. So we got

0:00:45.680 --> 0:00:50.000
<v Speaker 1>that that's happening this upcoming season in the NFL. We

0:00:50.040 --> 0:00:52.960
<v Speaker 1>talked about rule changes. We said, you can you can

0:00:53.000 --> 0:00:55.120
<v Speaker 1>propose any rule change except for the fumble out of

0:00:55.120 --> 0:00:58.040
<v Speaker 1>the end zone touchback rule. And the rule that Fritzie

0:00:58.080 --> 0:00:59.720
<v Speaker 1>wanted to change was the fumble out of the end

0:00:59.760 --> 0:01:02.520
<v Speaker 1>zone touchback rule. Just hate that takes the year, even

0:01:02.520 --> 0:01:05.320
<v Speaker 1>though everyone's mentioned it fifteen times before. I did that

0:01:05.600 --> 0:01:07.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of penalty for trying to make a special play

0:01:07.959 --> 0:01:11.000
<v Speaker 1>and reach over and try to score that the other

0:01:11.040 --> 0:01:13.080
<v Speaker 1>teams should get it. That can never be. No one

0:01:13.120 --> 0:01:14.960
<v Speaker 1>can explain to me why that should exist. Hates it

0:01:15.080 --> 0:01:17.040
<v Speaker 1>so much that just broke the rules of our game.

0:01:17.120 --> 0:01:19.360
<v Speaker 1>Just to mention again, that's how much he hates it.

0:01:20.720 --> 0:01:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Here's another one I saw again, Lisa's at the bottom

0:01:23.200 --> 0:01:25.520
<v Speaker 1>of the notes that the NFL released about rule changes. Yeah,

0:01:25.560 --> 0:01:29.000
<v Speaker 1>they completed a study on the sharp drop and offensive

0:01:29.040 --> 0:01:31.840
<v Speaker 1>holding penalties during the twenty twenty season. They said the

0:01:31.959 --> 0:01:34.679
<v Speaker 1>NFL Senior Vice President for Training and Development would clarify

0:01:34.720 --> 0:01:37.120
<v Speaker 1>the standard for holding and put together a video for

0:01:37.160 --> 0:01:39.480
<v Speaker 1>teams to consume. Before the twenty twenty one season. We

0:01:39.480 --> 0:01:41.559
<v Speaker 1>were discussing it, and here a lot during this past

0:01:41.600 --> 0:01:44.959
<v Speaker 1>football season that it seemed like and the numbers beared out,

0:01:44.959 --> 0:01:47.920
<v Speaker 1>the penalties were down, especially offensive holding, and it made

0:01:47.920 --> 0:01:50.640
<v Speaker 1>for a much better season. We spent there's more big plays,

0:01:50.760 --> 0:01:52.680
<v Speaker 1>less callback, and we spent a lot less time talking

0:01:52.680 --> 0:01:55.720
<v Speaker 1>about the refs. Much better season. You're not a defensive lineman,

0:01:55.880 --> 0:01:58.160
<v Speaker 1>You're not an edge rusher. There is saying that was

0:01:58.240 --> 0:02:01.240
<v Speaker 1>the worst season ever. It's funny. Yeah, I don't think

0:02:01.280 --> 0:02:04.680
<v Speaker 1>that they were holding less, right. I think because I

0:02:04.680 --> 0:02:08.840
<v Speaker 1>would read some analysis on some of these offensive linemen,

0:02:09.040 --> 0:02:10.560
<v Speaker 1>and they said, this is a guy who used to

0:02:10.600 --> 0:02:14.720
<v Speaker 1>have a problem with offensive holding, benefited by the league

0:02:14.919 --> 0:02:18.320
<v Speaker 1>calling fewer offensive holding. So it's interesting that they're gonna

0:02:18.360 --> 0:02:20.440
<v Speaker 1>look at it because I kind of was under the

0:02:20.880 --> 0:02:23.520
<v Speaker 1>I guess I was assuming that it was that it

0:02:23.560 --> 0:02:25.560
<v Speaker 1>was league driven that they wanted to say, hey, let's

0:02:25.600 --> 0:02:27.400
<v Speaker 1>let's cut back on some of these holding calls. Because

0:02:27.440 --> 0:02:30.040
<v Speaker 1>I agree, there's there's nothing worse. There are a few

0:02:30.080 --> 0:02:32.600
<v Speaker 1>things worse in the NFL than a long seventy yard

0:02:32.680 --> 0:02:36.520
<v Speaker 1>touchdown run called back because of holding away from the

0:02:36.520 --> 0:02:38.960
<v Speaker 1>ball that had no impact on the play. If we

0:02:39.080 --> 0:02:43.160
<v Speaker 1>never see that again, I'll be super happy. It's it's

0:02:43.160 --> 0:02:46.160
<v Speaker 1>almost like the referees got together and they were like, Okay,

0:02:46.280 --> 0:02:49.720
<v Speaker 1>we could call this on every single play every game,

0:02:49.960 --> 0:02:53.160
<v Speaker 1>on probably multiple players, right every single play. Let's just

0:02:53.160 --> 0:02:54.800
<v Speaker 1>not call it at all, or call it only if

0:02:54.800 --> 0:02:57.840
<v Speaker 1>it's really, really really egregious, which is so much better.

0:02:58.720 --> 0:03:00.560
<v Speaker 1>So we'll see what the NFL does there. Yeah, I

0:03:00.560 --> 0:03:02.800
<v Speaker 1>think you're right. A lot of people liked where it was.

0:03:02.880 --> 0:03:04.840
<v Speaker 1>We'll see how how different it is this year. We

0:03:04.919 --> 0:03:09.440
<v Speaker 1>are a week away exactly from Round one of the draft,

0:03:10.000 --> 0:03:11.840
<v Speaker 1>so much chatter about what's going to happen in the

0:03:11.840 --> 0:03:13.880
<v Speaker 1>first ten picks here. I think going through the first

0:03:13.880 --> 0:03:16.480
<v Speaker 1>ten picks, every one of them is super interesting. Number

0:03:16.480 --> 0:03:20.280
<v Speaker 1>one Jacksonville Jaguars Trevor Lawrence. I think that's interesting. New

0:03:20.360 --> 0:03:23.320
<v Speaker 1>York Jets looks like they're going to take the fast

0:03:23.440 --> 0:03:27.320
<v Speaker 1>rise or quarterback out of BYU Zach Wilson. And then

0:03:27.480 --> 0:03:30.200
<v Speaker 1>at number three, we're going to talk to my good

0:03:30.200 --> 0:03:32.320
<v Speaker 1>friend Matt Mayoko, who's been covering the forty nine ers

0:03:32.320 --> 0:03:35.080
<v Speaker 1>for years and years and years about what they may

0:03:35.160 --> 0:03:38.200
<v Speaker 1>do at number three. But I think that changes everything

0:03:38.920 --> 0:03:42.720
<v Speaker 1>because depending on who they go with, I think that

0:03:42.760 --> 0:03:45.800
<v Speaker 1>there's going to be a scramble for the two quarterbacks

0:03:45.880 --> 0:03:48.160
<v Speaker 1>remaining no matter who they pick, because I think if

0:03:48.200 --> 0:03:50.440
<v Speaker 1>they do pass on mac Jones, I think there are

0:03:50.440 --> 0:03:53.400
<v Speaker 1>other teams lower that think highly enough of mac Jones

0:03:53.400 --> 0:03:55.200
<v Speaker 1>that are going to trade up, maybe with the Falcons

0:03:55.200 --> 0:03:57.160
<v Speaker 1>at for Paul and the Atlanta Falcons when they were

0:03:57.160 --> 0:03:59.000
<v Speaker 1>at their best, it was when Matt Ryan had a

0:03:59.040 --> 0:04:02.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of weapons because and Julio Jones and was Roddy

0:04:02.480 --> 0:04:04.360
<v Speaker 1>White back then when they were in the Super Bowl mix.

0:04:04.960 --> 0:04:07.360
<v Speaker 1>If you're Atlanta do you stick with Matt Ryan for

0:04:07.480 --> 0:04:10.839
<v Speaker 1>three more years good NFL quarterback or high somewhat high

0:04:10.880 --> 0:04:13.680
<v Speaker 1>end NFL quarterback and give him the best skill position

0:04:13.680 --> 0:04:15.560
<v Speaker 1>player you can He's sitting there. You get your choice

0:04:15.560 --> 0:04:18.279
<v Speaker 1>of any skill position player in this draft, Atlanta, or

0:04:18.320 --> 0:04:20.479
<v Speaker 1>you could trade down and get a defender. What's that

0:04:20.520 --> 0:04:24.360
<v Speaker 1>going to do for your program? He's only thirty six, right,

0:04:24.400 --> 0:04:29.719
<v Speaker 1>Matt Ryan. It's funny. It's he could go down in

0:04:29.839 --> 0:04:34.120
<v Speaker 1>history as the greatest boring quarterback of all times. Like

0:04:34.160 --> 0:04:36.359
<v Speaker 1>you look at his numbers. His numbers are Hall of

0:04:36.400 --> 0:04:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Fame worthy. His numbers are up there with a lot

0:04:40.080 --> 0:04:43.520
<v Speaker 1>of quarterbacks. He's just not that interesting to talk about.

0:04:43.560 --> 0:04:46.479
<v Speaker 1>Wouldn't Joe Flacco be first ballot though? But he's a

0:04:46.520 --> 0:04:50.040
<v Speaker 1>better quarterback then. I'm saying he's at another level. Like

0:04:50.120 --> 0:04:52.919
<v Speaker 1>you look at Matt Ryan and what he's done, and

0:04:53.360 --> 0:04:56.919
<v Speaker 1>it's in an era where we're passing more. Quarterback numbers

0:04:56.920 --> 0:05:00.279
<v Speaker 1>are inflated, but we just kind of take Matt Ryan

0:05:00.320 --> 0:05:03.920
<v Speaker 1>for granted, and I think he has been one of

0:05:03.960 --> 0:05:07.320
<v Speaker 1>the best quarterbacks of his generation. Mclovin, Well, you're right,

0:05:07.320 --> 0:05:09.960
<v Speaker 1>there's gonna be a few. I mean, Philip Rivers has

0:05:10.000 --> 0:05:12.440
<v Speaker 1>that weird person he's a little he'll be a boring

0:05:12.480 --> 0:05:15.200
<v Speaker 1>Hall of Famer maybe, yeah, but no, Matt Ryan's a

0:05:15.320 --> 0:05:17.680
<v Speaker 1>king consent if he makes a Hall of Fame Cousins,

0:05:17.880 --> 0:05:20.560
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not even saying boring in the personality department,

0:05:20.560 --> 0:05:22.159
<v Speaker 1>although that's a little bit of it. It It just seems

0:05:22.200 --> 0:05:24.720
<v Speaker 1>like Matt Ryan. He's Matt Ryan. He doesn't do anything

0:05:24.760 --> 0:05:26.480
<v Speaker 1>that flashy, you know, it's just kind of he just

0:05:26.520 --> 0:05:28.520
<v Speaker 1>gets the job done. But he gets the job done

0:05:28.520 --> 0:05:29.760
<v Speaker 1>at a high level, and he's done it for a

0:05:29.760 --> 0:05:32.560
<v Speaker 1>long time. Cousins, Oh, is an owner of too many vans. Yeah,

0:05:32.600 --> 0:05:34.960
<v Speaker 1>he told us that, I mean too minivans. It's Ryan

0:05:35.040 --> 0:05:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Hall of Famer and we all agreed on that or

0:05:37.680 --> 0:05:40.240
<v Speaker 1>not agreed. I don't think many people think he is.

0:05:41.560 --> 0:05:45.040
<v Speaker 1>His numbers say he's close. If he had won that

0:05:45.120 --> 0:05:48.160
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowl against the Patriots twenty eight to three is

0:05:48.160 --> 0:05:51.600
<v Speaker 1>going to hurt him. So if I'm them, I I

0:05:52.080 --> 0:05:54.760
<v Speaker 1>stick with Matt Ryan. I ride it as long as

0:05:54.760 --> 0:05:57.839
<v Speaker 1>you can ride it. We've seen quarterbacks, well one or

0:05:57.880 --> 0:06:00.159
<v Speaker 1>two in their forties being able to do it. What

0:06:00.200 --> 0:06:04.920
<v Speaker 1>do you think about this? Kyle Pitts for Atlanta give

0:06:05.000 --> 0:06:09.560
<v Speaker 1>him another weapon. You got Kelvin, you got Julio, give

0:06:09.640 --> 0:06:11.800
<v Speaker 1>him a generational talent at tight end. Here's the other

0:06:11.839 --> 0:06:14.560
<v Speaker 1>thought on that, though the Atlanta Falcons rarely draft in

0:06:14.600 --> 0:06:16.320
<v Speaker 1>the top four. The last time they draft in the

0:06:16.360 --> 0:06:19.159
<v Speaker 1>top four, they took Matt Ryan, and they may not

0:06:19.279 --> 0:06:23.240
<v Speaker 1>be in striking distance to get justin fields or you know,

0:06:23.279 --> 0:06:26.719
<v Speaker 1>another quarterback again, And if you're gonna do it, this

0:06:26.800 --> 0:06:27.800
<v Speaker 1>is the time. You don't have to trade up. You

0:06:27.839 --> 0:06:30.279
<v Speaker 1>don't give up draft capital. So that's what a lot

0:06:30.320 --> 0:06:35.280
<v Speaker 1>of people Atlanta think is the other option. You never know.

0:06:36.200 --> 0:06:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Partly you never know. You think like, oh, it's going

0:06:38.160 --> 0:06:40.680
<v Speaker 1>to be a weak draft class. We weren't talking about

0:06:40.720 --> 0:06:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Mac Jones a year ago. We weren't talking about Zach

0:06:43.320 --> 0:06:46.840
<v Speaker 1>Wilson really a year ago. And now they're two of

0:06:46.880 --> 0:06:49.160
<v Speaker 1>the top quarterbacks and teams are trading up for him.

0:06:49.200 --> 0:06:54.080
<v Speaker 1>So maybe Bengals at five Bengals is funny because what

0:06:54.120 --> 0:06:55.839
<v Speaker 1>do you do? Do you protect Joe Burrow? What you

0:06:55.880 --> 0:06:57.560
<v Speaker 1>need to do? Obviously we saw this past year what

0:06:57.600 --> 0:07:01.040
<v Speaker 1>happens if you don't or do you give him a weapon?

0:07:01.320 --> 0:07:05.120
<v Speaker 1>Perhaps his college wide receiver in Jamar Chase at LSU.

0:07:06.360 --> 0:07:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Two great players I don't know. I almost feel like

0:07:09.600 --> 0:07:11.960
<v Speaker 1>you can't go wrong there. Mclovin, what do you think. Yeah,

0:07:11.960 --> 0:07:14.760
<v Speaker 1>that's a big debate. I would go oh line, because

0:07:15.120 --> 0:07:17.640
<v Speaker 1>if Joe burrows on his butt, he's not gonna hit anybody.

0:07:17.720 --> 0:07:21.200
<v Speaker 1>He's already got a couple of receivers. Dolphins can do

0:07:21.240 --> 0:07:24.360
<v Speaker 1>the same thing at six. They can get two a

0:07:24.400 --> 0:07:27.320
<v Speaker 1>team to back up with Davante Smith or Jalen Waddle,

0:07:27.400 --> 0:07:31.160
<v Speaker 1>two receivers from Alabama. I don't know what Miami's gonna do.

0:07:31.200 --> 0:07:32.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't have a good read on them. You see

0:07:32.960 --> 0:07:36.640
<v Speaker 1>reports they might trade down again. A yeah, maybe they're

0:07:36.640 --> 0:07:39.960
<v Speaker 1>just in love with trading up down out of every pick.

0:07:41.640 --> 0:07:43.800
<v Speaker 1>Who was it Eric da Costa that said something about

0:07:43.800 --> 0:07:46.120
<v Speaker 1>that The Ravens GM is like, they asked him, you've

0:07:46.160 --> 0:07:48.560
<v Speaker 1>been doing so well, you're such a great GM and

0:07:48.600 --> 0:07:50.880
<v Speaker 1>you've you've done well in the draft. How have you

0:07:50.960 --> 0:07:54.080
<v Speaker 1>done it? And his quote basically was, we just get

0:07:54.120 --> 0:07:56.280
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of picks, and we take a lot of players,

0:07:56.400 --> 0:07:58.440
<v Speaker 1>and you have a higher chance of getting good players

0:07:58.600 --> 0:08:02.280
<v Speaker 1>the more picks you have. I was like, it's as genius.

0:08:02.920 --> 0:08:05.360
<v Speaker 1>It is, like, you're right, it is. It's not a

0:08:05.360 --> 0:08:08.120
<v Speaker 1>total crapshoot because you look at every year, first rounders

0:08:08.160 --> 0:08:11.080
<v Speaker 1>on average perform better than second rounders who want to

0:08:11.080 --> 0:08:13.320
<v Speaker 1>average perform better than third rounders. So there is something

0:08:13.360 --> 0:08:15.800
<v Speaker 1>to it, But you don't know which first rounders are

0:08:15.800 --> 0:08:18.240
<v Speaker 1>going to be those guys. There's gonna be fifteen first

0:08:18.320 --> 0:08:20.680
<v Speaker 1>rounders who pan out and become starters in the other

0:08:20.720 --> 0:08:24.440
<v Speaker 1>fifteen arn't and you might hit, you might not. Seven

0:08:24.520 --> 0:08:26.320
<v Speaker 1>is the Detroit Lions. All right, I'm gonna put you

0:08:26.440 --> 0:08:28.480
<v Speaker 1>on this one because you are a Lions fan, right,

0:08:28.920 --> 0:08:31.480
<v Speaker 1>long time Lions, long time lines. Let's say the Lions

0:08:31.480 --> 0:08:35.280
<v Speaker 1>are on the clock and there's quarterbacks plural still out there.

0:08:35.720 --> 0:08:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Would you rather see them go with a quarterback even

0:08:37.800 --> 0:08:40.520
<v Speaker 1>though they got Jared Goff and draft picks, but there's

0:08:40.559 --> 0:08:42.640
<v Speaker 1>a quarterback who drops to them. Let's say Justin Fields

0:08:42.640 --> 0:08:44.600
<v Speaker 1>happens to be available and the Lions on the clock,

0:08:45.160 --> 0:08:47.320
<v Speaker 1>or if you were a as a Lions fan, would

0:08:47.320 --> 0:08:50.679
<v Speaker 1>you rather see them helped the defense, helped Jared Goff

0:08:50.840 --> 0:08:53.280
<v Speaker 1>or trade out and get even more draft picks for

0:08:53.320 --> 0:08:54.920
<v Speaker 1>their future, which you have a lot of draft picks.

0:08:55.880 --> 0:08:59.640
<v Speaker 1>If Penney Sewell is somehow there at seven, I say

0:08:59.679 --> 0:09:02.480
<v Speaker 1>take him take the offensive lineman. You can never go

0:09:02.559 --> 0:09:07.720
<v Speaker 1>wrong protecting your quarterback if he's not there, and Justin

0:09:07.800 --> 0:09:14.720
<v Speaker 1>Fields is there, I don't know, you're grinding. I love it.

0:09:14.760 --> 0:09:17.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Jared Goff was a number one pick. He

0:09:17.920 --> 0:09:20.280
<v Speaker 1>was in the Super Bowl not that long ago. You

0:09:20.320 --> 0:09:23.880
<v Speaker 1>can clearly win with Jared Goff. Now you have to

0:09:23.960 --> 0:09:27.960
<v Speaker 1>have Aaron Donald around you on the defensive side of

0:09:27.960 --> 0:09:30.600
<v Speaker 1>the ball, and the Lions have nothing like that. I'm

0:09:30.640 --> 0:09:33.760
<v Speaker 1>going with Jared Goff. I'm going with him. I'm going

0:09:33.760 --> 0:09:36.680
<v Speaker 1>with Jared Goff. We'll get a quarterback later, give me

0:09:36.720 --> 0:09:39.480
<v Speaker 1>another stud at a different position. We have too many holes.

0:09:40.160 --> 0:09:42.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. We'll see how that pans out. Carolina

0:09:42.320 --> 0:09:45.440
<v Speaker 1>Panthers eight, A lot of people thought they were in

0:09:45.480 --> 0:09:47.200
<v Speaker 1>the market for a quarterback. Then they went out and

0:09:47.240 --> 0:09:52.920
<v Speaker 1>got Sam Darnold. What do you think, mclovin, what do

0:09:52.920 --> 0:09:54.679
<v Speaker 1>you think are they I don't think they're in the

0:09:55.000 --> 0:09:57.320
<v Speaker 1>I think that did it for them. They got their quarterback.

0:09:57.400 --> 0:10:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Now they can do whatever we good friend of the show,

0:10:01.120 --> 0:10:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Peter Schreeger, Good Morning Football. I think he had maybe

0:10:05.080 --> 0:10:07.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm miss corner. I think he had Justin Fields going

0:10:07.040 --> 0:10:08.880
<v Speaker 1>there saying that they might still be in off the

0:10:08.880 --> 0:10:10.480
<v Speaker 1>double check that it might have been another one. So

0:10:10.520 --> 0:10:13.080
<v Speaker 1>there are some well what if justin fields fall would

0:10:13.120 --> 0:10:16.240
<v Speaker 1>they would they double upper quarterback? But I would go

0:10:16.240 --> 0:10:18.520
<v Speaker 1>oh line, And same for your Lions too, by the way,

0:10:18.520 --> 0:10:21.640
<v Speaker 1>I would go oh line. Maybe I feel I'm a

0:10:21.640 --> 0:10:23.160
<v Speaker 1>big old line right. The other thing is I noticed

0:10:23.200 --> 0:10:25.559
<v Speaker 1>all these mock drafts, like the offensive tackles are starting

0:10:25.600 --> 0:10:28.199
<v Speaker 1>to sneak up into the top ten. Like everyone was

0:10:28.200 --> 0:10:31.680
<v Speaker 1>talking about Davante Smith and now you're seeing offensive tackles

0:10:31.800 --> 0:10:35.079
<v Speaker 1>move up. It seems like they're the safe pick you're

0:10:35.120 --> 0:10:37.439
<v Speaker 1>gonna you know what you're gonna get. Although looking at

0:10:37.520 --> 0:10:40.199
<v Speaker 1>last year there were a couple in the top ten

0:10:40.280 --> 0:10:43.200
<v Speaker 1>mclove and correct me if I'm wrong. That didn't totally

0:10:43.200 --> 0:10:46.080
<v Speaker 1>pan out. What Thomas that went to the Giants. Some

0:10:46.120 --> 0:10:50.319
<v Speaker 1>people like it Andrew Thomas, But Trista Warfs was good back,

0:10:50.360 --> 0:10:53.400
<v Speaker 1>There was good Jedrick Wills last year was a pretty

0:10:53.480 --> 0:10:56.400
<v Speaker 1>good tackle class piece, but kai back then. But you're right.

0:10:57.200 --> 0:10:59.520
<v Speaker 1>Dan said the other day that he thinks it's safe

0:10:59.520 --> 0:11:01.559
<v Speaker 1>for to draft to a linemans you can kick him

0:11:01.559 --> 0:11:04.280
<v Speaker 1>to guard where But to look at the receivers in

0:11:04.320 --> 0:11:06.160
<v Speaker 1>the first round, we're worse than the receivers in the

0:11:06.160 --> 0:11:09.920
<v Speaker 1>second round last year. There's so many good receivers again

0:11:11.240 --> 0:11:13.400
<v Speaker 1>in this draft. And I bring it up just because

0:11:13.440 --> 0:11:15.760
<v Speaker 1>I worked with them all the time. My buddy Chris

0:11:15.840 --> 0:11:19.720
<v Speaker 1>Simms made a great point, he said, he said about

0:11:19.720 --> 0:11:23.079
<v Speaker 1>these smaller wide receivers, He's just like, we're seeing so

0:11:23.120 --> 0:11:25.480
<v Speaker 1>many more of them in the game because he thinks

0:11:25.520 --> 0:11:31.400
<v Speaker 1>part of it is because basketball has moved to just

0:11:31.440 --> 0:11:33.120
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of tall guys who can shoot. He used

0:11:33.120 --> 0:11:34.720
<v Speaker 1>to be you know, tall guys down low who are

0:11:34.760 --> 0:11:36.760
<v Speaker 1>big and bruisers and da da da, and then you

0:11:36.840 --> 0:11:39.640
<v Speaker 1>got the short guys out wide who can shoot, dribble

0:11:39.720 --> 0:11:41.839
<v Speaker 1>all that. But the way the NBA and the way

0:11:41.920 --> 0:11:45.600
<v Speaker 1>college basketball has all gone, everyone's tall and everyone can shoot.

0:11:45.760 --> 0:11:48.800
<v Speaker 1>It's like everyone's athletic, and so here you got a

0:11:48.800 --> 0:11:50.560
<v Speaker 1>bunch of guys and a lot of the receivers in

0:11:50.600 --> 0:11:54.760
<v Speaker 1>this draft are five to eleven, six foot hundred and

0:11:54.960 --> 0:11:58.720
<v Speaker 1>what sixties something pounds if you're Deafante Smith. And last

0:11:58.800 --> 0:12:01.840
<v Speaker 1>year the first widestiever I think was it Ruggs. Henry

0:12:01.880 --> 0:12:05.880
<v Speaker 1>Ruggs out of Alabama, Small, fast, not great. In his

0:12:05.960 --> 0:12:10.040
<v Speaker 1>first year, he showed flashes. Justin Jefferson, bigger guy, sets

0:12:10.040 --> 0:12:11.960
<v Speaker 1>of rookie records with the Vikings. I mean he was

0:12:12.080 --> 0:12:13.880
<v Speaker 1>all Pro, not even Pro Bowl, and he was the

0:12:13.960 --> 0:12:16.480
<v Speaker 1>twenty second pick Justin Jefferson. That's a lot of it

0:12:16.520 --> 0:12:19.199
<v Speaker 1>depends on how you use him. The Denver Broncos, who

0:12:19.200 --> 0:12:23.080
<v Speaker 1>picked ninth this year, they took wide receiver, wide receiver

0:12:23.559 --> 0:12:25.920
<v Speaker 1>last year, the kid out of Alabama, and then kJ

0:12:26.040 --> 0:12:30.440
<v Speaker 1>Hamler out of Penn State. Yeah, Jerry Judy out of Alabama.

0:12:30.559 --> 0:12:32.480
<v Speaker 1>I wonder what they do. I mean, Drew Locke was

0:12:32.480 --> 0:12:37.080
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be their answer. Doesn't look like he's going

0:12:37.160 --> 0:12:39.240
<v Speaker 1>to be the answer. Fritzie years. Yeah, I think Locke

0:12:39.240 --> 0:12:41.640
<v Speaker 1>had had his chance. They gave him several chances, and

0:12:41.960 --> 0:12:43.960
<v Speaker 1>I think it's time to start a new There a

0:12:44.040 --> 0:12:46.720
<v Speaker 1>five and eleven, six and ten team. They can't even

0:12:46.760 --> 0:12:49.120
<v Speaker 1>get to five hundred. It's it's an effort for them

0:12:49.120 --> 0:12:51.240
<v Speaker 1>to get anywhere near the end zone. When they used

0:12:51.240 --> 0:12:53.960
<v Speaker 1>to put up thirty forty fifty points in the Manning days,

0:12:53.960 --> 0:12:55.400
<v Speaker 1>I think they got to try to move up and

0:12:55.400 --> 0:12:57.760
<v Speaker 1>if they couldn't get Russell Wilson, they gotta, i think,

0:12:57.760 --> 0:12:59.840
<v Speaker 1>try to grab that fourth spot from the Falcons. May

0:13:00.000 --> 0:13:02.200
<v Speaker 1>we look at field or Lance and start all over again.

0:13:02.200 --> 0:13:04.520
<v Speaker 1>A quarterback and they can't just run it back and

0:13:04.559 --> 0:13:06.520
<v Speaker 1>stay in the last place in the division. When Drew

0:13:06.559 --> 0:13:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Locke was shooting the Lasers, Fritzie got his Drew Locke

0:13:09.840 --> 0:13:12.760
<v Speaker 1>sweatshirt back out. Who's wearing it for the first time? Mom,

0:13:12.880 --> 0:13:14.720
<v Speaker 1>I like his moxie when things are going well, but

0:13:14.760 --> 0:13:16.720
<v Speaker 1>they haven't gone well enough to the way brought out

0:13:16.760 --> 0:13:19.440
<v Speaker 1>the Knicks one instead, if you didn't look at his stats,

0:13:19.520 --> 0:13:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Drew Locke behaves like a Pro Bowl quarterback, like if

0:13:22.840 --> 0:13:24.160
<v Speaker 1>you see him on the field, like that guy must

0:13:24.160 --> 0:13:26.120
<v Speaker 1>be awesome. If you don't watch him play, but you

0:13:26.120 --> 0:13:28.880
<v Speaker 1>watch his reaction to plays. That's so funny because they

0:13:28.920 --> 0:13:31.120
<v Speaker 1>often say that the quarterback has to be a leader.

0:13:31.160 --> 0:13:33.840
<v Speaker 1>You got to be the guy out there leading. But

0:13:34.160 --> 0:13:36.520
<v Speaker 1>people don't mention the fact that if you're not performing

0:13:36.559 --> 0:13:39.240
<v Speaker 1>on the field, it's very difficult to be a good leader.

0:13:39.280 --> 0:13:41.800
<v Speaker 1>You're right, people don't take you seriously. You got to

0:13:41.960 --> 0:13:46.800
<v Speaker 1>You gotta pair them both performance and leadership. You can't

0:13:46.880 --> 0:13:51.360
<v Speaker 1>have one without the other. And then ten Dallas Cowboys,

0:13:51.360 --> 0:13:53.959
<v Speaker 1>they're talking like they everyone says they like Kyle Pitts.

0:13:53.960 --> 0:13:56.040
<v Speaker 1>But that seems like that's gotta be just a rumor,

0:13:56.160 --> 0:13:59.320
<v Speaker 1>a rumor out there. Um, you guys want to talk

0:14:00.080 --> 0:14:02.760
<v Speaker 1>movies at all here? I mean, we don't have enough time.

0:14:02.840 --> 0:14:04.520
<v Speaker 1>We do feel like now, I feel like it turns

0:14:04.520 --> 0:14:06.400
<v Speaker 1>out we do. I feel like we have to get

0:14:06.400 --> 0:14:08.720
<v Speaker 1>to a commercial break from the rules that you set

0:14:08.760 --> 0:14:10.720
<v Speaker 1>up for me before I hosted this show. If you

0:14:10.720 --> 0:14:12.520
<v Speaker 1>could just set it a backdrop off. Can you tell

0:14:12.600 --> 0:14:15.120
<v Speaker 1>us where you're from in your age and generally where

0:14:15.160 --> 0:14:18.240
<v Speaker 1>you grow I am from Michigan, I am forty one

0:14:18.320 --> 0:14:21.560
<v Speaker 1>years old, and I'm today hosting the Dan Patrick Show.

0:14:21.600 --> 0:14:23.160
<v Speaker 1>And when you grew up, you had a television in

0:14:23.160 --> 0:14:24.560
<v Speaker 1>the house, and we had a TV, and you went

0:14:24.600 --> 0:14:27.600
<v Speaker 1>to movies like any other family every once in a while. Yes, okay,

0:14:27.800 --> 0:14:29.160
<v Speaker 1>you sent us a note the other day. We were

0:14:29.160 --> 0:14:32.520
<v Speaker 1>discussing movies and you said you had not seen this movie.

0:14:32.760 --> 0:14:35.160
<v Speaker 1>Do you have you drive your permission to give it out?

0:14:35.280 --> 0:14:39.600
<v Speaker 1>You do? You've never seen the movie Goodfellas? How does

0:14:39.600 --> 0:14:41.480
<v Speaker 1>that happen to in America? The man who does this

0:14:41.520 --> 0:14:45.120
<v Speaker 1>show every day has not seen that movie either. I

0:14:45.120 --> 0:14:47.400
<v Speaker 1>feel like I'm in good company. I think he made

0:14:47.760 --> 0:14:49.680
<v Speaker 1>good on it and finally saw but he got a

0:14:49.720 --> 0:14:53.720
<v Speaker 1>good point. Okay. I think Dan Dan is famous for

0:14:53.760 --> 0:14:57.320
<v Speaker 1>watching pieces of movies, so I think he actually probably

0:14:57.360 --> 0:14:59.600
<v Speaker 1>watched some of good Fellas. I don't know that he's

0:14:59.600 --> 0:15:02.400
<v Speaker 1>that he's finished it. That's usually the way he goes heh. Yeah,

0:15:02.400 --> 0:15:04.120
<v Speaker 1>I watch half a good Fellows the other night something

0:15:04.120 --> 0:15:06.960
<v Speaker 1>like that. I watched The Missus Doubtfire, no kidding, all right.

0:15:07.200 --> 0:15:09.400
<v Speaker 1>So there were two that I had not seen for

0:15:09.480 --> 0:15:13.960
<v Speaker 1>a long time, Godfather and Caddyshack. I had not seen

0:15:14.000 --> 0:15:16.120
<v Speaker 1>either of them for a long time, and so I

0:15:16.160 --> 0:15:19.600
<v Speaker 1>went back. Last year I watched Godfather for the first time.

0:15:19.680 --> 0:15:21.800
<v Speaker 1>Two years ago I watched Caddyshack for the first time,

0:15:22.040 --> 0:15:27.840
<v Speaker 1>and Caddyshack setan unfortunately for me watching it in twenty nineteen,

0:15:28.760 --> 0:15:31.480
<v Speaker 1>it did not stand the test of time. I think

0:15:31.520 --> 0:15:34.320
<v Speaker 1>that's a movie as great as it is needed to

0:15:34.360 --> 0:15:37.040
<v Speaker 1>be seen when it was made. Well. I would comment

0:15:37.120 --> 0:15:42.720
<v Speaker 1>on that if Caddysheck stands the test of time. But

0:15:42.800 --> 0:15:45.960
<v Speaker 1>I've never seen Caddysheck all the way through. I've seen

0:15:46.000 --> 0:15:49.120
<v Speaker 1>pieces of it. I've never actually sat down, like hit

0:15:49.200 --> 0:15:51.280
<v Speaker 1>start and then saw the credits at the end. You know,

0:15:51.320 --> 0:15:53.040
<v Speaker 1>if we didn't have forty five minutes ago. I'd ask

0:15:53.040 --> 0:15:55.520
<v Speaker 1>you guys to leave the building. Welcome to my world.

0:15:55.720 --> 0:15:57.280
<v Speaker 1>This is my world. This is my world. It's like

0:15:57.320 --> 0:16:01.040
<v Speaker 1>I haven't seen Caddyshack. What you've not seen candy Shack?

0:16:01.120 --> 0:16:04.080
<v Speaker 1>That's my life, right, I've never seen it. I've never

0:16:04.080 --> 0:16:07.240
<v Speaker 1>seen Slapshot either, which I haven't seen that one either.

0:16:07.280 --> 0:16:09.080
<v Speaker 1>See I am in good company here here. I thought

0:16:09.080 --> 0:16:12.840
<v Speaker 1>I was going to be an outlier. Fritzie, Caddy Shack, Godfather,

0:16:12.920 --> 0:16:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Reservoir Dogs, all movies they did not see start to finish,

0:16:16.160 --> 0:16:18.520
<v Speaker 1>so bits and pieces of it and whatever I was watching,

0:16:18.640 --> 0:16:20.600
<v Speaker 1>either it either ended or I didn't stick with it

0:16:20.880 --> 0:16:23.880
<v Speaker 1>because I didn't see it from the bigger Have you seen? Maybe?

0:16:23.880 --> 0:16:25.960
<v Speaker 1>You say, have you seen Animal House? I have not

0:16:26.000 --> 0:16:28.560
<v Speaker 1>seen Animal House? Okay, can you name a movie you

0:16:28.560 --> 0:16:31.680
<v Speaker 1>have seen? Yeah? You have you seen any movies? Yeah? There?

0:16:31.680 --> 0:16:32.840
<v Speaker 1>And there are a lot of good ones. What's the

0:16:32.880 --> 0:16:36.000
<v Speaker 1>last one you've seen? Last one I saw again was

0:16:36.000 --> 0:16:38.080
<v Speaker 1>a movie i'd seen before, which is a really good

0:16:38.080 --> 0:16:40.920
<v Speaker 1>movie that doesn't get talked about enough. Sister Act is

0:16:40.920 --> 0:16:44.320
<v Speaker 1>a great movie. WHOOPI Goldberg, awesome movie. Go Warren Hill?

0:16:44.480 --> 0:16:47.680
<v Speaker 1>Is that the one one and two. Yeah, yeah, yeah,

0:16:47.800 --> 0:16:49.640
<v Speaker 1>when you and your high school buddies grew up, what

0:16:49.680 --> 0:16:51.920
<v Speaker 1>movies did you see? And quote and Joe, we didn't

0:16:52.040 --> 0:16:54.560
<v Speaker 1>do that. I did. Like, I'll be honest with you.

0:16:54.640 --> 0:16:56.160
<v Speaker 1>People ask me this, They go, okay, if you didn't

0:16:56.160 --> 0:16:58.200
<v Speaker 1>watch movies and you don't really get into that. Many

0:16:58.320 --> 0:17:00.560
<v Speaker 1>like Netflix TV shows, They go, what do you do?

0:17:00.800 --> 0:17:02.840
<v Speaker 1>And I tell them I go, I don't know. I'll

0:17:02.840 --> 0:17:04.840
<v Speaker 1>be quite honest with you. You don't know what you've done.

0:17:04.880 --> 0:17:07.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what I do. Are you a reader?

0:17:07.920 --> 0:17:11.280
<v Speaker 1>I must be scrolling Twitter all the time. Twitter, it's

0:17:11.320 --> 0:17:13.520
<v Speaker 1>only been around since, it's like two thousan ten. Exactly

0:17:13.560 --> 0:17:16.840
<v Speaker 1>what did I do before then? I played video games Nintendo?

0:17:16.920 --> 0:17:19.479
<v Speaker 1>I mean RBI Baseball. I could beat all of y'all

0:17:19.520 --> 0:17:24.520
<v Speaker 1>at RBI Baseball. I challenge you Techmo super Bowl. I

0:17:24.520 --> 0:17:26.200
<v Speaker 1>haven't played a long time, though you might be able

0:17:26.200 --> 0:17:28.639
<v Speaker 1>to beat me. Mclovin. I mean, at some point the

0:17:28.760 --> 0:17:31.239
<v Speaker 1>nuns didn't notice something was different about Whoopie Goldberg its

0:17:31.240 --> 0:17:34.480
<v Speaker 1>sister track. That's your movie? That is? That can't possibly

0:17:34.520 --> 0:17:36.960
<v Speaker 1>a real favorite? My favorite movie Number one all time,

0:17:37.040 --> 0:17:43.680
<v Speaker 1>The Horse Product, No Groundhog's Day? All right? See You're recovering.

0:17:43.800 --> 0:17:46.000
<v Speaker 1>That's my favorite movie of all That's a nice recovery

0:17:46.040 --> 0:17:48.720
<v Speaker 1>by you. And that's one of the you know, that's

0:17:48.720 --> 0:17:51.000
<v Speaker 1>a top ten comedy of all time. Probably, Yeah, it's

0:17:51.000 --> 0:17:53.520
<v Speaker 1>in the Cannon. Yeah, okay, since you're forty one, how

0:17:53.520 --> 0:17:57.120
<v Speaker 1>about like Wedding Crashers? Old School? Is that your wheelhouse?

0:17:57.160 --> 0:18:00.439
<v Speaker 1>More so Wedding Crashers? I did see Old School? No,

0:18:00.760 --> 0:18:02.560
<v Speaker 1>And you know what, I don't know what it is here.

0:18:03.080 --> 0:18:05.520
<v Speaker 1>It's like I have a hard time committing to a

0:18:05.600 --> 0:18:09.119
<v Speaker 1>whole hour and a half. Like Fritzie says, like he

0:18:09.119 --> 0:18:10.800
<v Speaker 1>doesn't got he hasn't got to the end of some

0:18:10.840 --> 0:18:12.720
<v Speaker 1>of these movies. It's like, do I really want to

0:18:12.760 --> 0:18:15.280
<v Speaker 1>commit the next hour and a half doing this one?

0:18:15.320 --> 0:18:17.919
<v Speaker 1>For Fritzie's the least busy person I've ever met in

0:18:17.960 --> 0:18:20.360
<v Speaker 1>my life. Besides booking guests for the dam Patch Show.

0:18:20.359 --> 0:18:22.159
<v Speaker 1>He does nothing. It's very funny when you say I

0:18:22.200 --> 0:18:23.920
<v Speaker 1>don't know what I do because I could totally relate

0:18:23.920 --> 0:18:26.480
<v Speaker 1>to that. When I'm not like having you know, pizza

0:18:26.600 --> 0:18:29.200
<v Speaker 1>or whatever, we're napping or something like that, I don't

0:18:29.240 --> 0:18:30.680
<v Speaker 1>know exactly what I do. I'll go for a walk

0:18:30.720 --> 0:18:32.600
<v Speaker 1>and stuff. I'll hang out with the family. But I'm

0:18:32.600 --> 0:18:35.800
<v Speaker 1>not binging Netflix and watching all these movies either. Me either.

0:18:36.160 --> 0:18:37.800
<v Speaker 1>But the time somehow goes by and then it's the

0:18:37.840 --> 0:18:39.400
<v Speaker 1>next day and the next week and the next month,

0:18:39.480 --> 0:18:41.199
<v Speaker 1>and I don't know exactly what I did other than

0:18:41.280 --> 0:18:44.439
<v Speaker 1>my work responsibilities and spending time being a father and

0:18:44.440 --> 0:18:47.080
<v Speaker 1>a husband. And they go, they go, yeah, did you

0:18:47.119 --> 0:18:49.200
<v Speaker 1>watch the game last night? I go, I didn't even

0:18:49.200 --> 0:18:51.760
<v Speaker 1>do that. No, I didn't. I can. I have no

0:18:51.920 --> 0:18:54.680
<v Speaker 1>Like if I if there's a crime, I have no alibi.

0:18:54.800 --> 0:18:56.440
<v Speaker 1>Like I'll be like, I may have done it because

0:18:56.440 --> 0:18:58.159
<v Speaker 1>I have no recollection of what I've done over the

0:18:58.200 --> 0:19:01.520
<v Speaker 1>last ten years. And it's not just movies for me.

0:19:01.560 --> 0:19:05.040
<v Speaker 1>It's like we never had HBO growing up, so I

0:19:05.160 --> 0:19:08.400
<v Speaker 1>never watched the Sopranos. I missed all that stuff. So

0:19:08.720 --> 0:19:10.560
<v Speaker 1>if I could just switch this up a little bit,

0:19:10.680 --> 0:19:12.800
<v Speaker 1>right since if I was to ask you what you

0:19:12.840 --> 0:19:14.800
<v Speaker 1>did last night, you'd be like, I don't know, no idea.

0:19:14.960 --> 0:19:17.960
<v Speaker 1>Do you have any plans today? Like what are you

0:19:18.160 --> 0:19:20.000
<v Speaker 1>when you're done with this? What are your plans for

0:19:20.040 --> 0:19:24.000
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the day. We'll go home. That's that's

0:19:24.040 --> 0:19:26.679
<v Speaker 1>my plan. I will go home. That's like that's the

0:19:26.760 --> 0:19:30.840
<v Speaker 1>driving part. My kids will get home from school around

0:19:31.400 --> 0:19:33.960
<v Speaker 1>three o'clock. How old are your kids? Six and five?

0:19:35.080 --> 0:19:38.240
<v Speaker 1>I'll scroll Twitter for a while to see what's going on. Right,

0:19:39.240 --> 0:19:42.399
<v Speaker 1>I may go over to TikTok said. I signed up

0:19:42.440 --> 0:19:47.200
<v Speaker 1>for that about six months ago. Highly entertaining, highly entertaining. Um,

0:19:47.440 --> 0:19:51.119
<v Speaker 1>it'll be dinner time. I'll eat, will you cook? I

0:19:51.160 --> 0:19:53.600
<v Speaker 1>will cook? You will I will cook the cook in

0:19:53.640 --> 0:19:55.720
<v Speaker 1>the family. But what you see, like, that's a thing

0:19:55.720 --> 0:19:58.439
<v Speaker 1>that's going to take up some time. Yes, right, So

0:19:58.520 --> 0:20:00.320
<v Speaker 1>that's where all my time is going. I think at

0:20:00.359 --> 0:20:03.800
<v Speaker 1>the time of mundane things that don't stand out. And

0:20:03.920 --> 0:20:05.679
<v Speaker 1>when I die, I'll go what did I waste my

0:20:05.720 --> 0:20:08.080
<v Speaker 1>life doing? And I was like, oh, scrolling Twitter and

0:20:08.080 --> 0:20:09.679
<v Speaker 1>cooking that was it. We still got to do a

0:20:09.680 --> 0:20:12.280
<v Speaker 1>deep dive on what you did from nineteen ninety two ten,

0:20:12.640 --> 0:20:15.879
<v Speaker 1>because those two decades are unaccounted for. I have a

0:20:15.960 --> 0:20:19.520
<v Speaker 1>terrible memory too. This is not good. This is not good.

0:20:19.640 --> 0:20:22.520
<v Speaker 1>We're getting too deep here. This is becoming like a

0:20:22.560 --> 0:20:25.960
<v Speaker 1>therapy session and I'm questioning everything about my life. I

0:20:26.040 --> 0:20:28.920
<v Speaker 1>need a commercial breakdown. Thanks for listening to The Dan

0:20:28.960 --> 0:20:31.760
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Show podcast. Be sure to catch us live every

0:20:31.760 --> 0:20:34.800
<v Speaker 1>weekday morning nine until noon eastern six to nine Pacific

0:20:34.880 --> 0:20:37.280
<v Speaker 1>on Fox Sports Radio, and you can find us on

0:20:37.320 --> 0:20:41.520
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app at FSR or stream us live on

0:20:41.560 --> 0:20:45.960
<v Speaker 1>the Peacock app. We welcome in Matt Mayoko, who I

0:20:46.040 --> 0:20:48.840
<v Speaker 1>used to work with over at NBC Sports Bay Area. Matt,

0:20:48.920 --> 0:20:51.080
<v Speaker 1>great to see you again. I know this has been

0:20:51.160 --> 0:20:56.120
<v Speaker 1>a crazy month for you. But ever since that trade happened,

0:20:56.160 --> 0:20:59.440
<v Speaker 1>what has it been like covering a draft pick that's

0:20:59.480 --> 0:21:02.480
<v Speaker 1>not gonna happened for like four or five weeks. Well,

0:21:02.520 --> 0:21:06.440
<v Speaker 1>it's been great from the standpoint that we've been able

0:21:06.480 --> 0:21:10.600
<v Speaker 1>to provide a lot of content on three quarterbacks that

0:21:10.800 --> 0:21:13.960
<v Speaker 1>the forty nine ers, Kyle Shannian and John Lynch in particular,

0:21:14.040 --> 0:21:17.679
<v Speaker 1>have flown around the country to watch. So with the

0:21:17.800 --> 0:21:21.159
<v Speaker 1>number three overall pick, we assume that Trevor Lawrence is

0:21:21.160 --> 0:21:23.080
<v Speaker 1>going to be off the board and Zach Wilson is

0:21:23.080 --> 0:21:25.200
<v Speaker 1>going to be off the board. So the forty nine

0:21:25.280 --> 0:21:28.399
<v Speaker 1>ers have racked up some I would say frequent flyer miles,

0:21:28.400 --> 0:21:32.720
<v Speaker 1>but I think they're private jet miles going to Tuscaloosa

0:21:32.800 --> 0:21:36.639
<v Speaker 1>to Columbus and too Fargo, and I know most items

0:21:36.720 --> 0:21:40.960
<v Speaker 1>people go there. It's to relax and vacation three great

0:21:41.160 --> 0:21:44.040
<v Speaker 1>vacation spots. But the forty nine ers have been working

0:21:44.080 --> 0:21:47.679
<v Speaker 1>to figure out which quarterback they will select with that

0:21:47.840 --> 0:21:51.359
<v Speaker 1>number three overall pick, and frankly, they really haven't supplied

0:21:51.400 --> 0:21:55.879
<v Speaker 1>any clues to which way they're leaning with that, all right,

0:21:56.000 --> 0:21:59.719
<v Speaker 1>So no clues out there. You hear media reports, You

0:21:59.760 --> 0:22:03.719
<v Speaker 1>hear a lot of mac Jones initially, and then he

0:22:03.720 --> 0:22:07.480
<v Speaker 1>shows up in in Columbus and justin Fields and now

0:22:07.560 --> 0:22:10.159
<v Speaker 1>is the betting favorite, and then no, Trey Lance is

0:22:10.200 --> 0:22:12.160
<v Speaker 1>coming strong. Now now I think mac Jones is back

0:22:12.200 --> 0:22:14.840
<v Speaker 1>to being the betting favorite. So if you were to

0:22:15.600 --> 0:22:18.960
<v Speaker 1>put your own hard earned money, Matt Mayoko on one

0:22:19.000 --> 0:22:21.840
<v Speaker 1>of those quarterbacks, which one do you think it would

0:22:21.840 --> 0:22:23.240
<v Speaker 1>be that the forty nine is going to call at

0:22:23.320 --> 0:22:27.920
<v Speaker 1>number three? Well, I would say from the beginning, the

0:22:28.200 --> 0:22:31.159
<v Speaker 1>guy that kind of stood out to me as the

0:22:31.240 --> 0:22:36.280
<v Speaker 1>person who best fits the description of a Kyle Shanahan

0:22:36.400 --> 0:22:41.440
<v Speaker 1>quarterback is mac Jones. And I know there's a very

0:22:41.560 --> 0:22:47.000
<v Speaker 1>wide disparity and wide range of opinions about him, and

0:22:47.080 --> 0:22:50.280
<v Speaker 1>that you know, I'm sure he does not at all

0:22:50.359 --> 0:22:53.480
<v Speaker 1>fit what some teams want to do. I think other

0:22:53.560 --> 0:22:56.440
<v Speaker 1>teams he fits very well, and I think the forty

0:22:56.480 --> 0:22:59.080
<v Speaker 1>nine Ers are one of those teams from just the

0:22:59.240 --> 0:23:04.000
<v Speaker 1>standpoint of playing traditional quarterback, and you'll know he's not

0:23:04.000 --> 0:23:06.800
<v Speaker 1>going to run around and make plays and make plays

0:23:06.800 --> 0:23:10.040
<v Speaker 1>off script and all that stuff. But I don't think

0:23:10.119 --> 0:23:13.000
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Shanahan wants a guy who's going to necessarily make

0:23:13.000 --> 0:23:16.440
<v Speaker 1>plays off script, because Kyle Shanahan is very confident in

0:23:16.480 --> 0:23:20.760
<v Speaker 1>his own ability to draw up plays against a certain defense,

0:23:21.160 --> 0:23:24.199
<v Speaker 1>and he expects the ball to come out on time

0:23:24.520 --> 0:23:27.040
<v Speaker 1>and to be on target and to get yards after

0:23:27.080 --> 0:23:30.480
<v Speaker 1>the catch. And that's why I certainly lean toward Mac

0:23:30.560 --> 0:23:33.359
<v Speaker 1>Jones as being that selection at number three. So I

0:23:33.440 --> 0:23:36.920
<v Speaker 1>know you work with Jeff Garcia, NFL quarterback eleven years,

0:23:36.920 --> 0:23:38.560
<v Speaker 1>five years with the forty nine ers. I don't know.

0:23:38.600 --> 0:23:40.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious if you talked with him at all about

0:23:40.400 --> 0:23:42.800
<v Speaker 1>those three rookie quarterbacks and his thoughts on some of

0:23:42.840 --> 0:23:45.919
<v Speaker 1>the pros and cons of each of them. Yeah. I

0:23:46.040 --> 0:23:50.119
<v Speaker 1>haven't specifically here in the last few weeks, but I

0:23:50.520 --> 0:23:55.159
<v Speaker 1>do believe that he's a justin fields guy, and you know,

0:23:55.200 --> 0:23:58.720
<v Speaker 1>the fan base out here certainly wants to see justin fields.

0:24:00.480 --> 0:24:03.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, from my standpoint, I think I'd be probably

0:24:03.680 --> 0:24:09.199
<v Speaker 1>more inclined to lean toward Trey Lance. I think Justin Fields,

0:24:09.200 --> 0:24:13.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean both all three of these guys are really

0:24:13.280 --> 0:24:18.879
<v Speaker 1>outstanding or we're really outstanding collegiate quarterbacks. They're all off

0:24:18.920 --> 0:24:23.240
<v Speaker 1>the charts smart as far as just football knowledge and

0:24:23.359 --> 0:24:28.160
<v Speaker 1>just smarts in general. The one thing that that kind

0:24:28.160 --> 0:24:31.399
<v Speaker 1>of gives me pause about Justin Fields, though, is just

0:24:31.480 --> 0:24:34.000
<v Speaker 1>the high number of sacks that he took while at

0:24:34.119 --> 0:24:37.280
<v Speaker 1>Ohio State. For whatever reason. You know, we know that

0:24:37.840 --> 0:24:42.719
<v Speaker 1>Ohio State, just as Alabama and North Dakota State at

0:24:42.800 --> 0:24:47.160
<v Speaker 1>the FCS level, all those teams, all those programs are

0:24:47.240 --> 0:24:50.760
<v Speaker 1>a cut above the competition they're facing by and large

0:24:50.800 --> 0:24:53.359
<v Speaker 1>on a weekly basis up until, of course, the playoffs.

0:24:54.160 --> 0:24:57.160
<v Speaker 1>And for Justin Fields to take as many sacks as

0:24:57.200 --> 0:25:00.000
<v Speaker 1>he takes, to me, is a little bit a large

0:25:00.080 --> 0:25:03.560
<v Speaker 1>arming because it's not like it's going to be easier

0:25:04.480 --> 0:25:07.320
<v Speaker 1>once you get to the NFL level, and so much

0:25:07.359 --> 0:25:09.520
<v Speaker 1>of it is getting rid of the ball on time

0:25:10.119 --> 0:25:14.879
<v Speaker 1>and not relying on your escapeability. And that's something that

0:25:14.920 --> 0:25:17.240
<v Speaker 1>I think in the NFL you see is that you

0:25:17.680 --> 0:25:21.160
<v Speaker 1>quarterbacks who are able to keep plays alive longer and

0:25:21.280 --> 0:25:25.800
<v Speaker 1>make more big plays off script are also the quarterbacks

0:25:25.960 --> 0:25:28.880
<v Speaker 1>who get sacked more. I think that would bear out

0:25:28.920 --> 0:25:31.920
<v Speaker 1>if you look at the quarterbacks in the NFL level.

0:25:32.000 --> 0:25:35.080
<v Speaker 1>And so I just I don't think that Kyle Shanahan

0:25:35.800 --> 0:25:38.720
<v Speaker 1>wants those negative plays. I mean, for him, a negative

0:25:38.720 --> 0:25:41.600
<v Speaker 1>play is if it wasn't drawn up properly, or it's

0:25:41.600 --> 0:25:45.399
<v Speaker 1>the wrong play call against the wrong defense. Get rid

0:25:45.440 --> 0:25:48.720
<v Speaker 1>of the ball and live to play another down. It's

0:25:48.720 --> 0:25:51.600
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily run around and maybe there's a chance that

0:25:51.680 --> 0:25:53.960
<v Speaker 1>he can break off a fifteen yard run, but also

0:25:54.560 --> 0:25:56.720
<v Speaker 1>there's a chance that he's going to be dropped for

0:25:56.720 --> 0:25:58.919
<v Speaker 1>a twelve yard sack. So I just don't think that

0:25:59.040 --> 0:26:03.560
<v Speaker 1>balance is something that necessarily would fit with Kyle Shanhon.

0:26:03.800 --> 0:26:07.399
<v Speaker 1>That said, of course they'll end up taking justin field

0:26:07.800 --> 0:26:11.000
<v Speaker 1>and we'll play this tape back. Matta please do, yeah,

0:26:11.040 --> 0:26:13.000
<v Speaker 1>please do. Matt Maoke has been covering the forty nine

0:26:13.040 --> 0:26:15.520
<v Speaker 1>ers for years with NBC Sports Bay Area. So what

0:26:15.600 --> 0:26:18.440
<v Speaker 1>happened with Jimmy g How did this all turn? Because

0:26:18.440 --> 0:26:20.640
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't long ago they were trading a second round

0:26:20.640 --> 0:26:22.960
<v Speaker 1>pick for him, they were paying him a lot of money,

0:26:22.960 --> 0:26:25.240
<v Speaker 1>which they are still paying him. He almost won a

0:26:25.320 --> 0:26:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowl came one or two passes away from doing that.

0:26:28.440 --> 0:26:30.560
<v Speaker 1>What change? Why? Why have they soured on Jimmy g

0:26:30.680 --> 0:26:33.120
<v Speaker 1>You think, yeah, well, I'll try to make this as

0:26:33.160 --> 0:26:35.919
<v Speaker 1>brief as possible, But yeah, I mean they acquired him

0:26:35.920 --> 0:26:38.200
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of the twenty seventeen season. He had

0:26:38.200 --> 0:26:40.520
<v Speaker 1>about a week or I'm sorry a month to learn

0:26:40.560 --> 0:26:43.640
<v Speaker 1>the playbook, and he was basically learning it a game

0:26:43.680 --> 0:26:46.479
<v Speaker 1>plan by game plan. Wasn't learning the entire offense. He

0:26:46.520 --> 0:26:49.240
<v Speaker 1>gets in at the end of the twenty twenty seventeen

0:26:49.280 --> 0:26:51.880
<v Speaker 1>season and just let it fly in the forty years,

0:26:51.960 --> 0:26:54.520
<v Speaker 1>won five games, he played exceptionally well, and then they

0:26:54.520 --> 0:26:57.720
<v Speaker 1>award him that contract. But really what happened with Garoppolo

0:26:58.359 --> 0:27:01.600
<v Speaker 1>is he never really took that next step. And I

0:27:01.640 --> 0:27:03.760
<v Speaker 1>think there was a lot of frustration on the part

0:27:03.760 --> 0:27:08.800
<v Speaker 1>of Kyle Shanahan of drawing the play up, explaining during

0:27:08.840 --> 0:27:11.880
<v Speaker 1>the week what your reads are and this is going

0:27:11.920 --> 0:27:14.240
<v Speaker 1>to pop open. All you have to do is trust

0:27:14.280 --> 0:27:16.840
<v Speaker 1>it and let it fly. And I don't know that

0:27:17.320 --> 0:27:21.679
<v Speaker 1>he made those kinds of anticipation. Throws up to the

0:27:21.760 --> 0:27:25.359
<v Speaker 1>liking of Kyle Shanahan, So there was some frustration there,

0:27:25.520 --> 0:27:28.040
<v Speaker 1>and even in the Super Bowl not even talk about

0:27:28.040 --> 0:27:31.080
<v Speaker 1>the Emmanuel Sanders overthrow, but there were a couple plays

0:27:31.080 --> 0:27:35.520
<v Speaker 1>before that where if he had just trusted his coaching

0:27:35.680 --> 0:27:39.000
<v Speaker 1>and throwing the ball on schedule, the forty nine is

0:27:39.080 --> 0:27:42.040
<v Speaker 1>probably win that game. And then you factor in so

0:27:42.160 --> 0:27:45.040
<v Speaker 1>that frustration along with the fact that two of the

0:27:45.040 --> 0:27:49.159
<v Speaker 1>past three years he hasn't remained healthy, and in twenty eighteen,

0:27:49.160 --> 0:27:51.320
<v Speaker 1>the forty nine Ers appeared to be ready to kind

0:27:51.359 --> 0:27:54.040
<v Speaker 1>of break through and perhaps be a playoff team, and

0:27:54.080 --> 0:27:57.320
<v Speaker 1>he gets injured a third game of the season, an

0:27:57.359 --> 0:28:00.119
<v Speaker 1>ill advised play on his part to try to cut

0:28:00.119 --> 0:28:02.000
<v Speaker 1>it back inside when he should have just run out

0:28:02.000 --> 0:28:04.560
<v Speaker 1>of bounds, tears his ACL and then, of course last

0:28:04.640 --> 0:28:07.280
<v Speaker 1>year a couple of different high ankle sprains. So I

0:28:07.320 --> 0:28:10.959
<v Speaker 1>think the combination of a little bit of frustration of

0:28:11.000 --> 0:28:14.560
<v Speaker 1>how he was running the offense as well as the

0:28:15.000 --> 0:28:18.600
<v Speaker 1>major frustration of not having him available for by and

0:28:18.720 --> 0:28:21.080
<v Speaker 1>large two of the past three seasons, and the forty

0:28:21.119 --> 0:28:24.360
<v Speaker 1>and Iers have decided we can't continue to risk this.

0:28:24.560 --> 0:28:27.920
<v Speaker 1>We need our best quarterback on the field, so let's

0:28:27.920 --> 0:28:30.360
<v Speaker 1>go get a new best quarterback, all right, So then

0:28:30.680 --> 0:28:34.200
<v Speaker 1>last one Matt after that, after they take a quarterback

0:28:34.240 --> 0:28:36.800
<v Speaker 1>which everyone thinks they're going to do what happens with

0:28:36.880 --> 0:28:39.560
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy Garoppolo because there's this thought and you mentioned it

0:28:39.600 --> 0:28:41.880
<v Speaker 1>there that if Jimmy g stays on the roster, wins

0:28:41.920 --> 0:28:43.719
<v Speaker 1>the job, has a really good year, they go to

0:28:43.720 --> 0:28:46.720
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs and then then what do you do? And

0:28:47.240 --> 0:28:49.160
<v Speaker 1>I say to them, you're talking to a Detroit Lions

0:28:49.200 --> 0:28:53.000
<v Speaker 1>fan and you're painting playoffs with a quarterback as a

0:28:53.040 --> 0:28:56.520
<v Speaker 1>bad case scenario. I would love that as with two quarterbacks.

0:28:56.520 --> 0:28:58.440
<v Speaker 1>So what do you think they do? Can they trade

0:28:58.520 --> 0:29:02.200
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy Gee? We talked to Ben Volan from Boston said

0:29:02.360 --> 0:29:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Patriots fans would love to have him back. Do you

0:29:04.680 --> 0:29:06.840
<v Speaker 1>think they ultimately keep him as a as an insurance

0:29:06.840 --> 0:29:11.000
<v Speaker 1>policy or trade him? That that is one that's very difficult.

0:29:11.000 --> 0:29:13.640
<v Speaker 1>They answer. I would think that if they get somebody

0:29:13.680 --> 0:29:17.000
<v Speaker 1>like Mac Jones or even Justin Fields. I think guys

0:29:17.040 --> 0:29:20.640
<v Speaker 1>who have played a lot of football here recently, I

0:29:20.800 --> 0:29:24.600
<v Speaker 1>think that they could definitely look to trade Jimmy Garoppolo.

0:29:26.120 --> 0:29:30.480
<v Speaker 1>And so with no guaranteed money, also, you know they

0:29:30.480 --> 0:29:32.680
<v Speaker 1>can trade him, they can cut him. I don't think

0:29:32.720 --> 0:29:35.240
<v Speaker 1>they would cut him, but they can get rid of

0:29:35.280 --> 0:29:38.360
<v Speaker 1>that contract and save that twenty five million for future

0:29:38.800 --> 0:29:40.960
<v Speaker 1>you know guys who are coming up on deals such

0:29:40.960 --> 0:29:45.080
<v Speaker 1>as Nick Bosa, Fred Warner, Mike McGlinchey and some others,

0:29:46.280 --> 0:29:48.920
<v Speaker 1>and with if they were to get a trade Lance,

0:29:48.960 --> 0:29:51.720
<v Speaker 1>I would think just because he hasn't played much football

0:29:51.760 --> 0:29:53.760
<v Speaker 1>here in the last year and a half, they would

0:29:53.800 --> 0:29:56.760
<v Speaker 1>hold on to Garoppolo. Now. Before the news broke on

0:29:56.800 --> 0:29:59.320
<v Speaker 1>March twenty sixth that they were trade making this trade

0:29:59.360 --> 0:30:03.280
<v Speaker 1>up to three, Kyle Sheanahan reached out to Jimmy Garoppolo

0:30:03.520 --> 0:30:06.800
<v Speaker 1>and basically what's been told him is do what Alex

0:30:06.880 --> 0:30:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Smith did with the Kansas City Chiefs in twenty seventeen,

0:30:11.120 --> 0:30:14.120
<v Speaker 1>and that was, you know, you're the air apparent is

0:30:14.160 --> 0:30:17.560
<v Speaker 1>behind you. In the case of Patrick Mahomes, if you

0:30:17.640 --> 0:30:22.040
<v Speaker 1>go out play well, the team benefits because, as you mentioned,

0:30:22.200 --> 0:30:24.840
<v Speaker 1>could be playoffs, could be you know, a march to

0:30:24.880 --> 0:30:28.600
<v Speaker 1>the Super Bowl, who knows. But ultimately, if Garoppolo stays

0:30:28.640 --> 0:30:32.560
<v Speaker 1>on the field and produces while also grooming the rookie

0:30:32.560 --> 0:30:36.160
<v Speaker 1>behind him, now all of a sudden, he can parlay

0:30:36.200 --> 0:30:40.400
<v Speaker 1>that into a great situation in twenty twenty two with

0:30:40.440 --> 0:30:43.200
<v Speaker 1>another team And in the case of Alex Smith, when

0:30:43.200 --> 0:30:46.360
<v Speaker 1>he moved on to Washington. He got a really nice contract.

0:30:46.480 --> 0:30:50.520
<v Speaker 1>So you know what's been pitched to Garoppolo is, yeah,

0:30:50.520 --> 0:30:53.600
<v Speaker 1>you're disappointed, you're pissed off all that stuff, but go

0:30:53.640 --> 0:30:57.640
<v Speaker 1>out and play good football and everybody benefits, first and

0:30:57.720 --> 0:31:01.600
<v Speaker 1>foremost yourself. It's going to be fascinating what they do

0:31:01.680 --> 0:31:04.000
<v Speaker 1>when they're on the clock. A week from today, Matt

0:31:04.000 --> 0:31:06.240
<v Speaker 1>Mayoko will be all over it. You can follow him

0:31:06.240 --> 0:31:08.600
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter, he's got a podcast, he's on TV, he

0:31:08.720 --> 0:31:11.520
<v Speaker 1>is everywhere. Matt Mayoko, my good friend from NBC Sports

0:31:11.880 --> 0:31:14.680
<v Speaker 1>Bay Area. Be good, my friend. Thanks all right, am,

0:31:14.680 --> 0:31:17.920
<v Speaker 1>and thank you so much. Matt knows all with the

0:31:18.000 --> 0:31:21.440
<v Speaker 1>forty niners, and just from following a lot of forty

0:31:21.520 --> 0:31:23.920
<v Speaker 1>nine ers fans out there still, I can tell you

0:31:24.000 --> 0:31:27.120
<v Speaker 1>and Matt alluded to it that if they do take

0:31:27.200 --> 0:31:29.880
<v Speaker 1>Matt Jones number three, overall, there's gonna be a lot

0:31:29.880 --> 0:31:32.320
<v Speaker 1>of upset fans out there. It might be the pick

0:31:32.600 --> 0:31:35.440
<v Speaker 1>and it might work out for the best. Fans are

0:31:35.440 --> 0:31:38.120
<v Speaker 1>not going to be on board right away. It's fascinating because,

0:31:38.240 --> 0:31:42.240
<v Speaker 1>like Garoppolo, seems like a good quarterback, but they must

0:31:42.240 --> 0:31:44.360
<v Speaker 1>know something that they've seen all his cards, they've seen

0:31:44.400 --> 0:31:46.320
<v Speaker 1>everything he could do kind of like the Bears move

0:31:46.360 --> 0:31:49.120
<v Speaker 1>on from Trubisky, even though for a Bear quarterback he

0:31:49.240 --> 0:31:52.600
<v Speaker 1>performed pretty well. The bar is low, but they said, nah,

0:31:52.600 --> 0:31:54.360
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna go in a different direction. You know what.

0:31:54.400 --> 0:31:56.239
<v Speaker 1>It reminds me of kind of it reminds me when

0:31:56.280 --> 0:31:58.720
<v Speaker 1>I was out in the Bay Area and covering the

0:31:58.760 --> 0:32:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Warriors and their head coach was Mark Jackson, and they

0:32:02.800 --> 0:32:05.240
<v Speaker 1>were better than they had been for a long long time,

0:32:05.840 --> 0:32:08.160
<v Speaker 1>and he got him to the playoffs and they hadn't

0:32:08.200 --> 0:32:09.440
<v Speaker 1>been there for a long time. They even want a

0:32:09.760 --> 0:32:12.920
<v Speaker 1>playoff series with Mark Jackson. And then the talk was

0:32:13.560 --> 0:32:16.160
<v Speaker 1>he's good to get us here. We need someone to

0:32:16.200 --> 0:32:19.480
<v Speaker 1>take us here though, and take us here and to

0:32:19.560 --> 0:32:24.720
<v Speaker 1>this level. And so yeah, like Matt was talking about there,

0:32:24.920 --> 0:32:26.800
<v Speaker 1>if you go back and look at your Warriors, what

0:32:26.920 --> 0:32:31.040
<v Speaker 1>your talking about. The year before dear Mark Jackson was there,

0:32:31.280 --> 0:32:33.480
<v Speaker 1>Steph Curry averaged twenty four points a game. He's a

0:32:33.520 --> 0:32:35.800
<v Speaker 1>very good player, but you made an All Star team.

0:32:35.840 --> 0:32:38.240
<v Speaker 1>He was taking about seven and a half threes a game.

0:32:38.800 --> 0:32:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Year and a half later, Steve Kurz in charge. He's

0:32:40.640 --> 0:32:43.240
<v Speaker 1>leading the league and score thirty points a game, shooting

0:32:43.280 --> 0:32:45.800
<v Speaker 1>eleven threes. A game and having he was the MVP,

0:32:47.120 --> 0:32:49.440
<v Speaker 1>big difference, big difference than format took him to the

0:32:49.480 --> 0:32:52.200
<v Speaker 1>next level. The problem was then a lot of people

0:32:52.240 --> 0:32:53.959
<v Speaker 1>saw the Warriors do that and they're like, all right,

0:32:53.960 --> 0:32:56.800
<v Speaker 1>we'll do that too, and they ended up actually firing

0:32:56.840 --> 0:32:59.000
<v Speaker 1>the coach that was better than the coach they hired.

0:32:59.040 --> 0:33:01.360
<v Speaker 1>So you don't always get right, and that's always the hope.

0:33:01.400 --> 0:33:03.640
<v Speaker 1>But I think that's what it is for the forty

0:33:03.680 --> 0:33:06.360
<v Speaker 1>nine ers. And when you see your season totally crumble

0:33:06.440 --> 0:33:09.440
<v Speaker 1>and collapse two what to the last three years, when

0:33:09.480 --> 0:33:12.440
<v Speaker 1>your quarterback gets hurt, you're gonna go, we need we

0:33:12.480 --> 0:33:15.280
<v Speaker 1>need to fix this. We need at least two quarterbacks

0:33:15.360 --> 0:33:17.520
<v Speaker 1>or one that's not going to get hurt. And you

0:33:17.840 --> 0:33:21.160
<v Speaker 1>can say injuries are flukey, and I do think they

0:33:21.160 --> 0:33:23.240
<v Speaker 1>are to a certain extent, but the more you talk

0:33:23.320 --> 0:33:27.640
<v Speaker 1>to NFL talent evaluators, they say, yes, injuries are flukey,

0:33:27.720 --> 0:33:31.120
<v Speaker 1>but there are some players who are athletic enough to

0:33:31.240 --> 0:33:33.320
<v Speaker 1>not get their body in that position. We'd started the

0:33:33.320 --> 0:33:35.520
<v Speaker 1>show by talking about Barry Sanders. He had very few

0:33:35.560 --> 0:33:38.240
<v Speaker 1>injuries in his career and his knees are been in

0:33:38.280 --> 0:33:41.560
<v Speaker 1>every which way, but he was athletic enough to get

0:33:41.560 --> 0:33:45.360
<v Speaker 1>his body out of those really tough situations. It's why

0:33:45.400 --> 0:33:48.160
<v Speaker 1>I think Kyler Murray goes number one. Very small quarterback,

0:33:48.560 --> 0:33:51.120
<v Speaker 1>but he's athletic enough not to take those big hits.

0:33:51.560 --> 0:33:54.600
<v Speaker 1>And you wonder about Jimmy Garoppolo's are they freak injuries

0:33:54.720 --> 0:33:57.520
<v Speaker 1>or is there certain times where he's putting himself into

0:33:57.560 --> 0:34:01.640
<v Speaker 1>bad situations and this is the result of it. I

0:34:01.640 --> 0:34:03.800
<v Speaker 1>don't know what's going to happen. Mcloban, what do you

0:34:03.800 --> 0:34:05.720
<v Speaker 1>think they do? I think they get a quarterback. I

0:34:05.800 --> 0:34:07.960
<v Speaker 1>think it's a they have a small window, well not

0:34:08.000 --> 0:34:09.799
<v Speaker 1>a small They have two Hall of famers. I think

0:34:10.120 --> 0:34:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Nick Bosa's he's a wrecking machine and George Kittles the

0:34:14.120 --> 0:34:16.560
<v Speaker 1>second best tight end or best. So they say, well,

0:34:16.600 --> 0:34:18.560
<v Speaker 1>we got we gotta get a guy to take advantage

0:34:18.560 --> 0:34:21.239
<v Speaker 1>of all these and Rahi Mostart and Debot and they

0:34:21.280 --> 0:34:23.759
<v Speaker 1>have so many good players. But what happens if they

0:34:23.800 --> 0:34:25.799
<v Speaker 1>traded all this and they're not good and they don't

0:34:25.800 --> 0:34:29.600
<v Speaker 1>have first round picks for a long time. Yeah, that's

0:34:29.680 --> 0:34:32.600
<v Speaker 1>the if you just gave up, you think you're giving up,

0:34:33.680 --> 0:34:37.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, twenty through thirty, hopefully if you're the forty

0:34:37.719 --> 0:34:40.040
<v Speaker 1>nine ers, or thirty two if it goes really well.

0:34:40.360 --> 0:34:42.439
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, what if you're giving up those future first

0:34:42.480 --> 0:34:46.400
<v Speaker 1>round picks are top ten picks. So I don't know.

0:34:47.080 --> 0:34:50.279
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Shanahan and John Lynch are very well liked out there,

0:34:50.320 --> 0:34:52.080
<v Speaker 1>taking them back to the Super Bowl. They got the

0:34:52.120 --> 0:34:55.760
<v Speaker 1>long term deal. But I do think, and I didn't

0:34:55.760 --> 0:34:58.240
<v Speaker 1>have a chance to ask Matt there, I do think, Paulie,

0:34:58.280 --> 0:35:02.279
<v Speaker 1>if this doesn't go well, if the quarterback they pick

0:35:02.440 --> 0:35:05.239
<v Speaker 1>is not the guy, I don't know how you survived that.

0:35:05.360 --> 0:35:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah you get fired. But they're kind of going doing

0:35:07.640 --> 0:35:10.040
<v Speaker 1>the move that the kans City Chiefs did. I think

0:35:10.080 --> 0:35:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Alex Smith made the Pro Bowl and they drafted Mahomes

0:35:13.800 --> 0:35:16.320
<v Speaker 1>that offseason. Alex Smith was a good Pro Bowl quarterback,

0:35:16.320 --> 0:35:18.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, led them to I think a ten and

0:35:18.120 --> 0:35:20.880
<v Speaker 1>four record or something like that, and they went the

0:35:20.960 --> 0:35:23.040
<v Speaker 1>other way and got Mahomes and they had Kelsey and

0:35:23.040 --> 0:35:25.680
<v Speaker 1>they had Timmy Kill and they plugged in Mahomes after

0:35:25.760 --> 0:35:28.960
<v Speaker 1>one year and all went fantastic. And Alex Smith went

0:35:28.960 --> 0:35:30.239
<v Speaker 1>through it a couple of times. He was with the

0:35:30.280 --> 0:35:32.200
<v Speaker 1>forty nine ers and then he got beat out by

0:35:32.239 --> 0:35:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Colin Kaepernick, and then he's with the Chiefs and gets

0:35:34.640 --> 0:35:37.600
<v Speaker 1>beat out by Patrick Mahomes. But I think for both

0:35:37.640 --> 0:35:40.520
<v Speaker 1>of those it made more sense. It's like Colin Kaepernick,

0:35:40.560 --> 0:35:42.239
<v Speaker 1>he can do so much. He can run, he can throw.

0:35:42.320 --> 0:35:44.680
<v Speaker 1>It's like, yeah, I can see that. And then Patrick

0:35:44.719 --> 0:35:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Mahomes comes in and throws fifty touchdowns. You're like, I

0:35:47.000 --> 0:35:48.960
<v Speaker 1>can see it more dynamic. He can give you more.

0:35:50.239 --> 0:35:53.560
<v Speaker 1>If they draft Mac Jones, that's a tougher argument to

0:35:53.680 --> 0:35:57.360
<v Speaker 1>make that this is clearly an upgrade. You have to

0:35:57.360 --> 0:35:59.680
<v Speaker 1>wait until it happens on the field and we will

0:35:59.680 --> 0:36:03.800
<v Speaker 1>see who they pick. With a third overall pick coming

0:36:03.920 --> 0:36:06.440
<v Speaker 1>up in just a week from now. I got to

0:36:06.480 --> 0:36:08.799
<v Speaker 1>take one more break and we come back. Well, we'll

0:36:08.840 --> 0:36:11.680
<v Speaker 1>say what we learned, what movies I should watch, what

0:36:11.760 --> 0:36:13.520
<v Speaker 1>I should do for the rest of the night, because honestly,

0:36:13.560 --> 0:36:15.600
<v Speaker 1>I have no plans. This is The Dan Patrick Show.

0:36:15.840 --> 0:36:18.400
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to The Dan Patrick Show podcast. Be

0:36:18.440 --> 0:36:21.000
<v Speaker 1>sure to catch us live every weekday morning nine until

0:36:21.040 --> 0:36:24.040
<v Speaker 1>noon eastern six to nine Pacific on Fox Sports Radio,

0:36:24.320 --> 0:36:27.240
<v Speaker 1>and you can find us on the iHeartRadio app at

0:36:27.280 --> 0:36:35.000
<v Speaker 1>FSR or stream us live on the Peacock app. Hey,

0:36:35.040 --> 0:36:38.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm Doug Gottlieb. The podcast is called All ball. We

0:36:38.520 --> 0:36:40.800
<v Speaker 1>usually talk all basketball all the time, but it's more

0:36:40.840 --> 0:36:44.520
<v Speaker 1>about the stories about what made these people love their

0:36:44.600 --> 0:36:48.120
<v Speaker 1>sport and all the interesting interactions along the way. We

0:36:48.239 --> 0:36:51.240
<v Speaker 1>talked to coaches, we talked to players. We tell you stories.

0:36:51.800 --> 0:36:54.600
<v Speaker 1>They download it, you listen to it. I think you'll

0:36:54.640 --> 0:36:57.480
<v Speaker 1>like it. Listen to All Ball with Doug Gotlieb on

0:36:57.480 --> 0:37:02.320
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts herever you get your podcast.

0:37:04.760 --> 0:37:07.880
<v Speaker 1>I love all the new rule changes we gave NFL

0:37:08.000 --> 0:37:11.640
<v Speaker 1>rule changes. We talked to Matt Mayoko about what may

0:37:11.640 --> 0:37:14.279
<v Speaker 1>happen with the forty nine ers at number three. He

0:37:14.400 --> 0:37:18.600
<v Speaker 1>thinks probably Mac Jones, he might go Trey Lance. We'll

0:37:18.600 --> 0:37:22.200
<v Speaker 1>see what the forty nine ers do there. What happened

0:37:22.440 --> 0:37:24.640
<v Speaker 1>in the past the day in sports history? Do we

0:37:24.680 --> 0:37:27.520
<v Speaker 1>have one of those Pauls? Yeah. In eighteen seventy six,

0:37:27.520 --> 0:37:30.160
<v Speaker 1>eight baseball teams began the first season of the National League.

0:37:30.400 --> 0:37:33.680
<v Speaker 1>Phillies won their first game. Nineteen fourteen, Babe Ruth made

0:37:33.719 --> 0:37:36.080
<v Speaker 1>his pitching debut with the Baltimore Orioles. His first three

0:37:36.160 --> 0:37:38.240
<v Speaker 1>years in the big leagues, he was just a pitcher.

0:37:39.000 --> 0:37:42.120
<v Speaker 1>Nineteen fifteen, the New York Yankees wore pinstripes for the

0:37:42.160 --> 0:37:45.279
<v Speaker 1>first time and let's see, oh not twenty ten. The

0:37:45.360 --> 0:37:48.240
<v Speaker 1>NFL Draft was aired in prime time for the first time,

0:37:48.520 --> 0:37:51.400
<v Speaker 1>and they announced it a couple of months earlier, and

0:37:51.400 --> 0:37:54.040
<v Speaker 1>I found a few articles the NFL announce were then

0:37:54.120 --> 0:37:56.200
<v Speaker 1>do the draft at night, the first round at night.

0:37:56.239 --> 0:37:58.279
<v Speaker 1>I think it was a Thursday night the first one.

0:37:58.400 --> 0:38:00.640
<v Speaker 1>People are like, there's not gonna be that kind of interest.

0:38:00.680 --> 0:38:03.040
<v Speaker 1>There's not enough action in the draft to put it

0:38:03.080 --> 0:38:05.839
<v Speaker 1>in primetime. Fast forward to now and we'll be talking

0:38:05.840 --> 0:38:08.879
<v Speaker 1>about next year's draft right after this year's draft. It's

0:38:08.880 --> 0:38:13.319
<v Speaker 1>a year long, year long process. Poll question, mcleovan, what

0:38:13.320 --> 0:38:14.759
<v Speaker 1>are we Who should the forty nine ers take a

0:38:14.880 --> 0:38:18.040
<v Speaker 1>number three? It's a runaway Justin Fields? Yeah, I feel

0:38:18.120 --> 0:38:20.879
<v Speaker 1>people love Justin Fields and I get it right, he's

0:38:20.920 --> 0:38:25.440
<v Speaker 1>the new age quarterback. But can he take advantage of

0:38:25.440 --> 0:38:28.080
<v Speaker 1>all the passing game stuff? I think that's the one question.

0:38:28.080 --> 0:38:30.960
<v Speaker 1>And he did at Ohio State. He did great there.

0:38:31.920 --> 0:38:33.680
<v Speaker 1>I think that's the one question that teams will have

0:38:33.719 --> 0:38:36.400
<v Speaker 1>on him. But he's awesome to watch on the football field.

0:38:37.840 --> 0:38:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Can I give you my baseball role changes? I always

0:38:40.080 --> 0:38:43.400
<v Speaker 1>got to throw those At the end. I feel like

0:38:43.400 --> 0:38:45.040
<v Speaker 1>this is not going to be a receptive audience to

0:38:45.080 --> 0:38:49.000
<v Speaker 1>them from what I've heard so far. But I love

0:38:49.040 --> 0:38:52.480
<v Speaker 1>baseball and I want to see it continue to thrive.

0:38:52.800 --> 0:38:55.680
<v Speaker 1>And what we've seen from the early numbers of MLB

0:38:55.920 --> 0:38:58.600
<v Speaker 1>dot TV, that's doing really well. A lot of people

0:38:58.600 --> 0:39:01.160
<v Speaker 1>are watching the first couple weeks here of the season.

0:39:03.160 --> 0:39:05.920
<v Speaker 1>But I want to make some games more important. One

0:39:06.000 --> 0:39:08.799
<v Speaker 1>hundred and sixty two games. I like that every night

0:39:08.840 --> 0:39:12.799
<v Speaker 1>there's a new game. You can watch your team every night,

0:39:13.560 --> 0:39:19.680
<v Speaker 1>But on Sunday, that game for every team is worth

0:39:20.120 --> 0:39:30.439
<v Speaker 1>three wins. Three win Sunday. Seaton has buried his head

0:39:30.440 --> 0:39:34.080
<v Speaker 1>into his hands. Pauli's head is down, He's embarrassed. Won't

0:39:34.120 --> 0:39:36.000
<v Speaker 1>even look at me anymore. I'm trying to soak it.

0:39:36.080 --> 0:39:38.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to soak this one. It's like the moneyball

0:39:38.840 --> 0:39:42.279
<v Speaker 1>in the three point shooting contests of the NBA. It's

0:39:42.320 --> 0:39:45.560
<v Speaker 1>all about events, right. The NFL is huge because Sunday

0:39:45.880 --> 0:39:48.960
<v Speaker 1>must watch. That's a huge event. That's your team. You

0:39:49.040 --> 0:39:52.200
<v Speaker 1>get one chance. He's each week. Baseball is different, your

0:39:52.239 --> 0:39:57.200
<v Speaker 1>play all the time. Three win Sunday. I think Fritzie's

0:39:57.200 --> 0:40:00.360
<v Speaker 1>on board. I think that's crazy talk. I had a

0:40:00.360 --> 0:40:01.880
<v Speaker 1>problem with putting a guy in second base and the

0:40:01.960 --> 0:40:04.839
<v Speaker 1>tent of giving them someone three wins for one, so

0:40:04.880 --> 0:40:07.280
<v Speaker 1>you save your picture. Let's say your picture is healthy,

0:40:07.360 --> 0:40:11.000
<v Speaker 1>your ace is healthy. For Saturday, you scratch them healthy scratch,

0:40:11.040 --> 0:40:12.480
<v Speaker 1>which is a I love him, one of my favorite

0:40:12.520 --> 0:40:15.319
<v Speaker 1>terms sports, and you save him for Sunday. That would

0:40:15.320 --> 0:40:17.759
<v Speaker 1>be a strategy, right, yeah. I think maybe you pitch

0:40:17.840 --> 0:40:21.279
<v Speaker 1>him three innings on a Tuesday, yeah, or a Wednesday,

0:40:21.360 --> 0:40:23.680
<v Speaker 1>and then you have him for the whole game on Sunday.

0:40:26.080 --> 0:40:28.040
<v Speaker 1>I bet there's one person out there that thinks that's

0:40:28.040 --> 0:40:31.839
<v Speaker 1>a good idea. And if you do email in, it's

0:40:31.840 --> 0:40:34.759
<v Speaker 1>original DP at Dan Patrick dot com and you guys

0:40:34.840 --> 0:40:37.840
<v Speaker 1>must read it tomorrow. Three wins Sunday, three win Sunday.

0:40:39.160 --> 0:40:40.919
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna give you my other rule changes because

0:40:40.920 --> 0:40:43.040
<v Speaker 1>that one wouldn't so poorly, but that one is my one.

0:40:43.080 --> 0:40:45.279
<v Speaker 1>I would love that one to happen to compensate. Would

0:40:45.320 --> 0:40:47.239
<v Speaker 1>it be half win Monday where you just put out

0:40:47.239 --> 0:40:50.200
<v Speaker 1>your worst guy? No? No, yeah, I mean it would

0:40:50.239 --> 0:40:53.200
<v Speaker 1>be like Saturday Night would be not a good team.

0:40:54.520 --> 0:40:58.600
<v Speaker 1>Your catcher wouldn't play. Mclovin, did you consider two games

0:40:58.880 --> 0:41:03.799
<v Speaker 1>you had to go to three? I considered four, and

0:41:03.920 --> 0:41:05.680
<v Speaker 1>my friends talk to me out of it. They go, am,

0:41:05.920 --> 0:41:08.800
<v Speaker 1>this is no one's gonna like this anyway, and especially

0:41:08.800 --> 0:41:10.799
<v Speaker 1>at four, and I was like, all right, I'll do three.

0:41:12.280 --> 0:41:14.319
<v Speaker 1>You have you'd have to watch that would if you're

0:41:14.320 --> 0:41:17.480
<v Speaker 1>a baseball fan, you'd have to watch that day. All right.

0:41:18.520 --> 0:41:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Maybe I should watch a movie tonight, Goodfellas. I'm give

0:41:23.520 --> 0:41:25.520
<v Speaker 1>it a shot. You'll like it a lot. Okay, I'll

0:41:25.520 --> 0:41:27.399
<v Speaker 1>give it a shot. I'll give it the frizzy style.

0:41:27.480 --> 0:41:29.360
<v Speaker 1>You will love Good fellow I'll watch the beginning of it.

0:41:29.400 --> 0:41:31.080
<v Speaker 1>I might not get to the end. If you watch

0:41:31.160 --> 0:41:32.480
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of it, I think you'll stick with it

0:41:32.520 --> 0:41:37.080
<v Speaker 1>all the way through. Ross Tucker in here tomorrow for me, guys,

0:41:38.000 --> 0:41:40.040
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for having me. You guys have built

0:41:40.080 --> 0:41:42.880
<v Speaker 1>something really special here. You should be really proud of that.

0:41:42.880 --> 0:41:45.839
<v Speaker 1>That is the Dan Patrick Show. I'm mama Fred. We'll

0:41:45.880 --> 0:41:47.960
<v Speaker 1>see it later. Go to rock Auto dot com for

0:41:48.120 --> 0:41:50.200
<v Speaker 1>all the parts your car will ever need. Rock Auto

0:41:50.280 --> 0:41:53.480
<v Speaker 1>dot Com is a family business founded by automotive engineers

0:41:53.520 --> 0:41:56.120
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen ninety nine with two goals in mind. Paul, perhaps,

0:41:56.120 --> 0:41:58.400
<v Speaker 1>can you guess what those two goals were? Help people

0:41:58.400 --> 0:42:01.400
<v Speaker 1>find parts for their cars at prices. That's both goals

0:42:01.480 --> 0:42:04.359
<v Speaker 1>right there. Bang, you nailed it absolutely. Rock auto dot

0:42:04.440 --> 0:42:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Com has the correct parts for vehicles of all ages.

0:42:07.160 --> 0:42:09.839
<v Speaker 1>As Paul, you know you just bought another another whip.

0:42:09.880 --> 0:42:12.040
<v Speaker 1>It's crazy helpful if you guys out there like old cars.

0:42:12.080 --> 0:42:13.799
<v Speaker 1>I just got a ninety six toy at a four

0:42:13.880 --> 0:42:16.440
<v Speaker 1>runner and it was missing two of the center caps,

0:42:16.440 --> 0:42:19.000
<v Speaker 1>like the caps on the wheels. I ordered those. They

0:42:19.000 --> 0:42:21.000
<v Speaker 1>were like fifteen bucks each, and then it was broken

0:42:21.080 --> 0:42:22.680
<v Speaker 1>the little air vents in the middle for the air

0:42:22.760 --> 0:42:25.120
<v Speaker 1>fashing heat. I ordered that. It was fourteen I'm looking

0:42:25.160 --> 0:42:27.080
<v Speaker 1>at now fourteen sixty one a rock auto dot com.

0:42:27.120 --> 0:42:29.359
<v Speaker 1>Well those seems like pretty like they gotta be tough

0:42:29.400 --> 0:42:32.120
<v Speaker 1>to go find. It's obscure parts. Yeah yeah, well, hey,

0:42:32.280 --> 0:42:35.280
<v Speaker 1>why waste time and money hunting for parts, phoning, driving,

0:42:35.320 --> 0:42:37.640
<v Speaker 1>waiting and lines. Go to rock auto dot com today.

0:42:37.920 --> 0:42:40.240
<v Speaker 1>Make sure you tell them about us, right Dan Patrick

0:42:40.280 --> 0:42:42.040
<v Speaker 1>in there, how did you hear about us? Box? So

0:42:42.120 --> 0:42:44.400
<v Speaker 1>that they know we sent you all the parts your

0:42:44.400 --> 0:42:46.520
<v Speaker 1>car will ever need. Rock Auto dot Com