WEBVTT - The BFF Trade Show: Week 3 rankings, running back values, and more... 0:00:00.560 --> 0:00:03.640 Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast, and remember, if you 0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:07.160 want to listen live, download the I Heart Radio app, 0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:10.080 download the tune and app and just search for Fantasy 0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:14.760 Sports Radio Network and you could listen to this program live. Also, 0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:17.360 if you want to watch the video of this podcast, 0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:21.000 check us out on YouTube, on twitch, or on Periscope 0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:24.840 and type in you guess do Fantasy Sports Network. You'll 0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:28.160 find us there. Enjoy the show and thanks for listening. 0:00:30.200 --> 0:00:38.880 You're listening to the Fantasy Sports Radio Network. Fantasy Best 0:00:38.920 --> 0:00:52.360 Friends Forever. M Do Do Do Do Do Do Do 0:00:52.360 --> 0:00:57.040 Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do 0:00:58.800 --> 0:01:03.280 Yo is the Fantasy Best Friends Forever. I am Frank 0:01:03.320 --> 0:01:08.360 Snaffle alongside the sweet vocals of Mike blew It Everybody 0:01:08.560 --> 0:01:13.120 Special guest hosts Greg Susman is out today. Filling in 0:01:13.160 --> 0:01:15.640 for him is Mike Blewett. Mike, how's reything going? Then? 0:01:15.680 --> 0:01:17.640 I'm gonna try and do so ably. I'm excited to 0:01:17.680 --> 0:01:21.720 be here. I've never I think I've been on BFFs before, 0:01:21.800 --> 0:01:23.840 and maybe more than a phone call or a minute 0:01:23.880 --> 0:01:26.520 or two. So excited to do it and excited to 0:01:26.560 --> 0:01:27.960 work with Frank. Frank and I have talked for a 0:01:27.959 --> 0:01:30.160 while about maybe doing a show together. So here's our 0:01:30.480 --> 0:01:34.600 inaugural effort, making his debut, not only his BFF debut, 0:01:34.680 --> 0:01:37.000 his his singing debut. Have you ever sang on the 0:01:37.000 --> 0:01:40.080 air before today? No? No, no, no no. I occasionally 0:01:40.120 --> 0:01:43.240 get people saying, hey, you have a voice for radio, 0:01:43.360 --> 0:01:45.959 that kind of stuff, but never has anybody said, you know, 0:01:46.000 --> 0:01:50.840 you should try and bust out your vocal skills via 0:01:50.840 --> 0:01:52.760 a song. So I've never been able to do it before. 0:01:53.000 --> 0:01:55.560 I'm a terrible singer. I'm a verse, I'm a very 0:01:55.600 --> 0:01:57.640 I'm a verse to karaoke, like, I just don't want 0:01:57.640 --> 0:02:00.000 to do it. I feel like it would embarrass myself. 0:02:00.040 --> 0:02:01.520 You know, I understand the point of it is to 0:02:01.520 --> 0:02:03.840 embarrass yourself, but I'm out my voice is that bad. 0:02:04.280 --> 0:02:06.200 Do you have a go to karaoke song if you 0:02:06.280 --> 0:02:10.119 had to do it? Honestly, no, I don't. I can't 0:02:10.160 --> 0:02:12.120 even think of one that I would try to do. 0:02:13.080 --> 0:02:15.560 Maybe the Boston College Fight song. That would probably be 0:02:15.600 --> 0:02:17.200 the only one that I would know the words too 0:02:18.560 --> 0:02:20.680 and be able to pull off. Are you Are you 0:02:20.720 --> 0:02:25.000 a fan of the nineties alternative pop rock scenes semi 0:02:25.120 --> 0:02:28.679 charm kind of life genre? Ish? I can't say I'm 0:02:28.720 --> 0:02:32.760 big on Third Eye Blind, but uh, it's not terrible. 0:02:32.800 --> 0:02:35.280 I mean it's sort of in my wheelhouse. As far 0:02:35.320 --> 0:02:37.920 as music that I listened to, I'm a little older, 0:02:38.000 --> 0:02:41.359 so my sweet spot for college music is grunge and 0:02:41.400 --> 0:02:44.240 alternative music. I was a hip hop fan growing up, 0:02:44.240 --> 0:02:45.720 so I listened to a lot of hip hop and 0:02:45.760 --> 0:02:48.400 all through the eighties and nineties, but it mixed with 0:02:48.440 --> 0:02:53.240 the nineties rock of Pearl Jam and Nirvana and Sound 0:02:53.320 --> 0:02:55.680 Garden and those types of groups. Who Fighters is one 0:02:55.680 --> 0:02:58.440 of my favorite bands of all time. I like that. 0:02:58.440 --> 0:03:01.360 That's a solid call. Um. I'm not going to ask 0:03:01.400 --> 0:03:03.320 you your age or try and expose that by any 0:03:03.320 --> 0:03:06.280 means here, but I've always said that I wish I 0:03:06.360 --> 0:03:08.480 was the age I am now growing up in the 0:03:08.480 --> 0:03:11.080 eighties and nineties, just because I mean, from everything I've heard, 0:03:11.400 --> 0:03:14.080 it was an absolutely wild time. And plus, you know 0:03:14.320 --> 0:03:18.160 a lot of things that I love, Metallica, Michael Jordan's 0:03:18.440 --> 0:03:19.920 I would have been able to see the inception of 0:03:19.960 --> 0:03:24.160 those things. Yea, the ninth like like early nineties in 0:03:24.200 --> 0:03:28.240 particular music and cinema were fantastic. When you look at 0:03:28.320 --> 0:03:31.200 the early the first half of the nineties movies. They're 0:03:31.200 --> 0:03:36.080 pretty incredible, from Usual Suspects to UH seven to pulp 0:03:36.120 --> 0:03:39.280 fiction and Shawshank Redemption and Good Fellas. All that kind 0:03:39.280 --> 0:03:42.080 of stuff came out in that five year spam. So 0:03:42.120 --> 0:03:47.760 there's your topic to your discussion today on film Music Movies. Um, 0:03:47.840 --> 0:03:51.160 Mike Blewett's genre of singing the balls in college fight songs. 0:03:51.320 --> 0:03:54.920 But on today's show, we'll be doing a trade special. Mike, 0:03:54.960 --> 0:03:57.000 I think this is really interesting. It's very early in 0:03:57.000 --> 0:03:59.720 the season still, but teams that get off to slow 0:03:59.760 --> 0:04:02.840 starrs oh and two might be panicking looking to make trades. 0:04:02.840 --> 0:04:04.960 I have people, you know, tweeting me NonStop telling me 0:04:05.000 --> 0:04:07.320 all these trades that they're making, you know, buying low 0:04:07.360 --> 0:04:09.160 on David Johnson will get into him a little bit 0:04:09.240 --> 0:04:11.000 later on. But there's a lot of guys who have 0:04:11.040 --> 0:04:14.440 either underperformed overperformed. So we'll talk a lot about those 0:04:14.480 --> 0:04:17.160 guys UH players who might want to target as a bylow, 0:04:17.279 --> 0:04:19.920 a cell high, or you know, maybe guys that you 0:04:19.920 --> 0:04:21.640 don't really know how to feel about their value right 0:04:21.680 --> 0:04:23.760 now and maybe he's just hold and we need a 0:04:23.760 --> 0:04:26.120 couple more weeks to see what their value really is. 0:04:26.160 --> 0:04:28.080 So We'll get into that a little bit later on 0:04:28.080 --> 0:04:30.320 in the show. I want to start off with some news. Obviously, 0:04:30.320 --> 0:04:33.919 the big news yesterday UM in both the NFL landscape 0:04:33.920 --> 0:04:36.040 and the fantasy landscape, and I'm intrigued to get your 0:04:36.040 --> 0:04:37.920 thoughts on it because you are a Pittsburgh Steelers fan. 0:04:38.480 --> 0:04:41.680 Is this whole situation going on with Antonio Brown? Now 0:04:41.800 --> 0:04:44.640 he's expected to be at the facility today. They've already 0:04:44.640 --> 0:04:48.200 talked about that, so that is a positive. But I 0:04:48.240 --> 0:04:53.640 spoke about Greg with this yesterday, and I was a 0:04:53.640 --> 0:04:57.000 little embarrassed by the way Antonio Brown was acting. And look, 0:04:57.000 --> 0:04:59.040 he's not the first diva wide receiver that's ever been 0:04:59.080 --> 0:05:02.760 around UM. But you know, they say you learned a 0:05:02.800 --> 0:05:04.880 lot about people when they get punched in the mouth. 0:05:04.920 --> 0:05:07.240 You see how they react. Right, And obviously this wasn't 0:05:07.320 --> 0:05:09.200 the start to the season that the Steelers thought they 0:05:09.240 --> 0:05:11.599 would get off to their oh one and one to start. 0:05:12.000 --> 0:05:14.719 UM really a must win game on Monday night against 0:05:14.720 --> 0:05:17.239 the Tampa Bay Bucks on the road, so I thought 0:05:17.240 --> 0:05:20.159 it was. But it was a little sad the way 0:05:20.160 --> 0:05:22.800 that Antonio Brown acted that you know, he's not getting 0:05:22.839 --> 0:05:24.600 the ball. The team got off to a slow start 0:05:24.880 --> 0:05:27.680 um and this is kind of his reaction. How do 0:05:27.720 --> 0:05:29.679 you feel about it overall the Steelers fan and doesn't 0:05:29.680 --> 0:05:32.640 affect fantasy Yeah, so, Dan Martinez and I we host 0:05:33.160 --> 0:05:36.120 Fantasy Sports Today together each and every morning, and you 0:05:36.120 --> 0:05:38.680 get your reruns in the afternoon. But you talked about 0:05:38.680 --> 0:05:41.000 it a little bit too. I am a Steelish fan, 0:05:41.120 --> 0:05:45.040 and I think to Frank's point, you do see a 0:05:45.040 --> 0:05:48.080 little bit of somebody's character, but I think it's a 0:05:48.120 --> 0:05:51.040 little underplayed. How much of diva behavior we've seen from 0:05:51.040 --> 0:05:54.120 Antonio Brown the last couple of years. There's people talking 0:05:54.120 --> 0:05:56.440 about Mike Tomlin losing the locker room. I don't think 0:05:56.480 --> 0:05:58.200 that's the case yet. The letting on belt thing is 0:05:58.200 --> 0:06:01.599 a real distraction. Antonio Brown can't keep doing this, and 0:06:01.680 --> 0:06:05.480 him missing work is extremely unprofessional. Right now, I've gotta 0:06:05.480 --> 0:06:07.960 be on Mike Tomlin's side without hearing any other information, 0:06:07.960 --> 0:06:09.920 because he says he didn't know that Antonio Brown was 0:06:09.960 --> 0:06:13.719 missing work. Drew Rosenhouse says Antonio Brown had a personal 0:06:13.760 --> 0:06:15.960 matter and he was excused. I would think that the 0:06:15.960 --> 0:06:18.200 head coach would not in a press conference say that 0:06:18.240 --> 0:06:20.919 he didn't know about it if he did. Mike Tomlin 0:06:20.960 --> 0:06:22.599 seems to be a stand up guy on that front, 0:06:22.839 --> 0:06:25.880 but we saw him facebook live a private locker room 0:06:25.920 --> 0:06:30.719 conversation after a playoff win. We've seen him throw tantrums 0:06:30.720 --> 0:06:34.839 on the sidelines, through garbage cans, yelling matches with Todd Haley, 0:06:34.960 --> 0:06:39.040 now reeling matches with Randy Fitchner and the wide receiver's 0:06:39.040 --> 0:06:42.320 coaches and name escapes me at the moment, but this 0:06:42.360 --> 0:06:45.040 type of behavior has happened. Ben has taken shots at 0:06:45.080 --> 0:06:49.000 Antonio Brown via the media. He's an extremely high paid 0:06:49.000 --> 0:06:51.360 wide receiver. Can you tell me who the highest targeted 0:06:51.360 --> 0:06:55.200 player in the NFL is so far this year? Antonio 0:06:55.240 --> 0:06:58.000 Brown by three over Michael Thomas. So it isn't a 0:06:58.040 --> 0:07:01.520 workload issue. It isn't a money shoe I can get. 0:07:01.640 --> 0:07:04.000 I can understand and being frustrated because they're oh one 0:07:04.000 --> 0:07:06.640 and one, But let's just not turn the ball over. 0:07:07.160 --> 0:07:09.480 Let's just play better defense and it will take care 0:07:09.520 --> 0:07:11.800 of itself. It's still a really talented team. I don't 0:07:11.800 --> 0:07:13.840 think they're a super Bowl team because of the loss 0:07:13.840 --> 0:07:16.440 of Ryan Shazier. I think that really impacted their defense 0:07:16.600 --> 0:07:18.600 in a way that they can't get it back. But 0:07:18.800 --> 0:07:20.600 they should be in the mix top four to eight 0:07:20.640 --> 0:07:22.640 teams in the league. I think that's where they should be. 0:07:22.720 --> 0:07:24.920 They're just not playing like it right now real quick. 0:07:24.960 --> 0:07:27.360 Does this open up the door for more opportunity for 0:07:27.400 --> 0:07:30.480 one James Washington, who we saw a scory touchdown last week? 0:07:30.560 --> 0:07:34.239 Or do you think it's just clearly Antonio Brown, juju 0:07:34.480 --> 0:07:36.920 Um and James Conner and kind of a little bit 0:07:36.920 --> 0:07:39.160 of sprinkle of James James Washington and the positive for 0:07:39.240 --> 0:07:42.080 James Washington's he played of the snaps his past weekend. 0:07:42.160 --> 0:07:44.040 They had to go to three wide receiver set a lot, 0:07:44.080 --> 0:07:46.880 obviously because they were trailing my homes through six touchdowns. 0:07:46.920 --> 0:07:49.560 But I think you want to be aware that James 0:07:49.560 --> 0:07:51.800 Washington is a guy in deeper leagues that he should 0:07:51.840 --> 0:07:53.760 be on your bench. I drafted him in one league, 0:07:53.800 --> 0:07:57.040 caught him after one week, maybe regretting it now, but 0:07:57.120 --> 0:07:59.160 I cut him for Philip Lindsay, so maybe I'll be 0:07:59.200 --> 0:08:01.960 in better shape. That's keeper league too, So you know, 0:08:02.040 --> 0:08:05.320 James Washington was a consideration long term, but I think 0:08:05.360 --> 0:08:07.280 you'll see a lot of three wide receiver sets out 0:08:07.280 --> 0:08:09.520 of them. But it would be hard for me to 0:08:09.600 --> 0:08:13.480 believe that he could crack the top three in targets 0:08:13.520 --> 0:08:15.800 this year. And plus, I mean Jesse James had a 0:08:15.800 --> 0:08:18.280 good game too, so you still have him hanging out there. 0:08:18.280 --> 0:08:20.240 But James Washington somebody to consider it. I just don't 0:08:20.240 --> 0:08:22.120 want you to think you're gonna get it every week. 0:08:22.200 --> 0:08:25.240 His role may look similar to Calvin Ridley's role looks 0:08:25.320 --> 0:08:28.600 right now in Atlanta. Moving on to the Philadelphia Eagles 0:08:28.640 --> 0:08:32.400 running back situation, we had some clarity come out today, Mike, 0:08:32.480 --> 0:08:35.520 in terms of j Ji and Darren's browles are both 0:08:35.760 --> 0:08:38.360 day to day. Yesterday there was a report that they 0:08:38.360 --> 0:08:41.240 would be surprised if j j I actually played this week. 0:08:41.440 --> 0:08:43.160 We saw last week he left the game. He did 0:08:43.200 --> 0:08:46.120 return and scored a touchdown which ultimately saved his day. 0:08:46.160 --> 0:08:48.160 But if it weren't for that, I mean, he really 0:08:48.160 --> 0:08:50.560 did not look great. Corey Clement actually looked pretty good 0:08:50.559 --> 0:08:53.160 in terms of total yards in that game. And I 0:08:53.200 --> 0:08:56.400 think you know, if j j I didn't go, Darren 0:08:56.400 --> 0:08:58.199 Spearles seems a little bit more doubtful this week in 0:08:58.240 --> 0:09:01.080 Week three against Indianapolis Colts. If j D doesn't go, 0:09:01.360 --> 0:09:05.280 Corey Clement is easily a high end flex maybe low 0:09:05.360 --> 0:09:08.120 end RB two. Even with the fact that Doug Peterson 0:09:08.160 --> 0:09:10.480 likes to, you know, spread the ball around was running next. 0:09:10.520 --> 0:09:13.120 I think, so I have to give Corey Parson credit. 0:09:13.240 --> 0:09:15.880 He like Corey Clement this past weekend guy gets in 0:09:15.920 --> 0:09:17.760 the end zone. So a pretty good call out of 0:09:17.760 --> 0:09:20.640 Corey Parson. I think you're right. I think Clement immediately 0:09:20.720 --> 0:09:23.640 is going to shoot up rankings and he'll be an 0:09:23.640 --> 0:09:26.560 extremely popular DFS play. He just will be. It's the 0:09:26.600 --> 0:09:29.520 way we saw last week when Freeman was declared out, 0:09:29.720 --> 0:09:32.240 Tevin Coleman became a really good DFS option. I think 0:09:32.240 --> 0:09:34.200 you'll see the same for Corey Clement. Who is this 0:09:34.240 --> 0:09:36.680 Corey Parson you talk about? I only know the fancy 0:09:36.679 --> 0:09:39.360 exam is the executive. Sorry. I sometimes I forget to 0:09:39.440 --> 0:09:42.080 use the nicknames that have been given to us or 0:09:42.200 --> 0:09:46.200 have been self proclaimed. I know. I know Craig likes 0:09:46.200 --> 0:09:49.520 to say Scott Angel is self proclaimed, but he's arguing 0:09:49.559 --> 0:09:54.439 that point. I don't. Tony Sankata and I used to 0:09:54.480 --> 0:09:57.520 talk about this a lot, where everybody around us seems 0:09:57.520 --> 0:09:59.800 to be scooping up nicknames, and I was like, all right, 0:10:00.000 --> 0:10:01.560 I was like, I wear a blazer a lot. Should 0:10:01.600 --> 0:10:04.040 I be the fantasy CEO? And he was like, somebody's 0:10:04.040 --> 0:10:06.600 got that. I was like, all right, Fantasy CEO. He's like, 0:10:06.600 --> 0:10:10.320 somebody's got that too. Gory's the Fantasy executive. So I 0:10:10.400 --> 0:10:13.200 just passed. Yeah, I don't really have anything that's stuck 0:10:13.240 --> 0:10:16.320 with me either. I went to Frank, is your handle though? 0:10:16.400 --> 0:10:18.760 That's all right? I had I was the Fantasy Salad. 0:10:18.840 --> 0:10:22.400 Last Twitter handle is literally my name. That's It. Doesn't 0:10:22.400 --> 0:10:25.040 get more straightforward than that. When your last name is Blewett, 0:10:25.160 --> 0:10:28.000 you learn over the years that that is how you're 0:10:28.000 --> 0:10:30.160 going to be identified, whether you like it or not. 0:10:30.320 --> 0:10:32.040 When you come up with some sort of clever nickname 0:10:32.080 --> 0:10:34.680 regarding my red hair or what how I look or whatever, 0:10:35.040 --> 0:10:37.199 your last name is blue Ittt, people just gravitate and 0:10:37.240 --> 0:10:41.160 start calling you blew It in work settings, in friends scenarios. 0:10:41.240 --> 0:10:44.360 That's just how I'm referred. Makes sense. Yeah, Blue is 0:10:44.360 --> 0:10:46.360 what some of my friends call me for short. But 0:10:46.679 --> 0:10:49.679 that's it, alright, alright, So all right, we'll have to 0:10:49.720 --> 0:10:51.760 figure out a nickname for you. I still don't have one. 0:10:51.880 --> 0:10:54.320 I kind of called myself the Fantasy superhero last week. 0:10:54.360 --> 0:10:56.840 Long story. Go back and listen to the tapes. I 0:10:56.840 --> 0:11:01.040 think Boona has a terrible has a promo somewhere if 0:11:01.040 --> 0:11:02.400 you want to play that during the break so people 0:11:02.440 --> 0:11:05.480 know what I'm talking about, Mike. We know football has 0:11:05.480 --> 0:11:07.640 been referred to as the battle of attrition. It's kind 0:11:07.640 --> 0:11:09.840 of cliche, but it seems that the Falcons are currently 0:11:09.880 --> 0:11:13.120 losing that battle. Uh. They've now lost left guard Andy 0:11:13.200 --> 0:11:16.920 leavitri as well to go along with the you know 0:11:16.960 --> 0:11:19.680 the players that they've lost on defense, Dion Jones, Kian O'Neil, 0:11:19.920 --> 0:11:22.280 and now a pretty big part of their offensive line. 0:11:22.320 --> 0:11:24.760 I know that you do a lot um with the 0:11:24.800 --> 0:11:28.440 offensive line rankings for rotal experts before the season, so 0:11:28.520 --> 0:11:31.840 you obviously worked very closely with offensive line um with 0:11:31.920 --> 0:11:34.520 offensive lines overall for fantasy football. How badly does this 0:11:34.559 --> 0:11:37.640 affect them? I think it's a bad one because it 0:11:37.720 --> 0:11:41.199 is just another log on the fire of this Atlanta season. 0:11:41.240 --> 0:11:43.240 I'll be full disclosure. I had Atlanta going to the 0:11:43.240 --> 0:11:46.360 Super Bowl taking out Tennessee. I just like the way 0:11:46.360 --> 0:11:47.920 that they lined up. I thought they'd have a nice 0:11:47.920 --> 0:11:50.600 bounce back season. So far, not so good. I mean, 0:11:50.600 --> 0:11:52.080 they're one on one. It's not the end of the world, 0:11:52.120 --> 0:11:54.440 but they lost their two best defenders Kian O'Neill, and 0:11:54.520 --> 0:11:57.439 Dion Jones, one of their running backs is out, although 0:11:57.480 --> 0:11:59.400 I think Keevin Coleman can sustain them for a long 0:11:59.440 --> 0:12:01.720 period of time time. But now we have an injury 0:12:01.800 --> 0:12:05.040 to Andy Levitra. They still have their tackles there and 0:12:05.120 --> 0:12:07.880 Schrader and Matthews and Alex Mack in the middle and 0:12:07.960 --> 0:12:11.560 Brandon Fusco starting, but now they're gonna be bringing somebody 0:12:11.559 --> 0:12:13.360 off the bench. It remains to be seen here that 0:12:13.440 --> 0:12:16.719 is gonna Ben Garland, Tyson, Brio West, Schweitzer are all 0:12:16.920 --> 0:12:20.719 possible backups there. But Levitra has been rated really well 0:12:20.760 --> 0:12:22.840 by Pro Football Focus and a guy that you know 0:12:22.920 --> 0:12:25.000 knocks on the door of the Pro Bowl. So I 0:12:25.080 --> 0:12:26.880 think it's it's a loss just the same way that 0:12:26.920 --> 0:12:29.400 the Giants lose their starting center. Is a bad loss 0:12:29.400 --> 0:12:32.160 for Atlanta. Yeah, it absolutely is. And we know, you know, 0:12:32.240 --> 0:12:35.440 DeVonta Freeman is also out right now. But Keevin Coleman 0:12:35.559 --> 0:12:38.199 filled in quite admirably last week. And again, if you 0:12:38.240 --> 0:12:40.960 were DeVonta Freeman owner, you probably go out there and 0:12:41.000 --> 0:12:43.160 make sure that you own Edo Smith to just in case, 0:12:43.160 --> 0:12:45.000 because he looked pretty good last week. He kind of 0:12:45.040 --> 0:12:49.600 filled in that Keevin Coleman role. That DeVonta Freeman role 0:12:49.720 --> 0:12:52.120 for the Atlanta Falcons a week ago, So we'll see 0:12:52.120 --> 0:12:53.400 what happens with them. I know we were talking a 0:12:53.440 --> 0:12:55.960 little bit downstairs about you know, what might the Falcons 0:12:56.000 --> 0:12:58.640 do in the off season. They have an opportunity, a 0:12:58.760 --> 0:13:01.840 chance that they maybe they let DeVonta Freeman go and 0:13:01.920 --> 0:13:04.560 choose to sign Tevin Coleman. Now it's a long term deal. 0:13:05.040 --> 0:13:06.760 I think there are ways that they can make that work. 0:13:06.800 --> 0:13:08.400 So that'll be interesting to see. But if you own 0:13:08.440 --> 0:13:10.920 Tevin Coleman in a keeper or dynasty league, I think 0:13:10.960 --> 0:13:13.240 you're pretty excited. There are two guys that I banged 0:13:13.280 --> 0:13:15.960 on the table about during the preseason to make sure 0:13:16.000 --> 0:13:21.920 that people were drafting appropriately in there keeper leagues. One 0:13:22.000 --> 0:13:24.080 was James Conner and the other one was Tevin Coleman. 0:13:24.160 --> 0:13:26.600 At Tevin Coleman's gonna be starting running back in the 0:13:26.720 --> 0:13:29.800 NFL next year. It could be Atlanta based on the 0:13:29.840 --> 0:13:32.160 things that you're talking about, but if not, it will 0:13:32.200 --> 0:13:34.720 be somewhere else, whether it's the Jets or somebody else 0:13:34.720 --> 0:13:37.720 that feels like they just need one more piece. Devin 0:13:37.720 --> 0:13:39.240 Coleman is going to be a guy that can command 0:13:39.320 --> 0:13:44.040 some money in the free agency market, as you aptly compared, 0:13:44.400 --> 0:13:46.680 it will be next year's Derrick McKinnon, although I think 0:13:46.679 --> 0:13:48.920 he's a better player than McKinnon. Yeah, i'd agree with that. 0:13:49.000 --> 0:13:51.760 I thought it made sense in terms of fantasy. He's 0:13:51.760 --> 0:13:53.960 gonna be the guy that either becomes a starter for 0:13:54.000 --> 0:13:57.040 his team with Atlanta due to getting rid of Davanta Freeman, 0:13:57.120 --> 0:13:58.959 or he will leave go somewhere else, become a starter 0:13:59.280 --> 0:14:01.760 and he'll move up into that second round of fantasy purposes. 0:14:01.800 --> 0:14:03.560 But I do agree with you. I think he's better 0:14:03.600 --> 0:14:06.040 all around running back then Jerick McKinnon. I had to 0:14:06.120 --> 0:14:09.760 see the parallels for fantasy football heading into next year, 0:14:09.760 --> 0:14:11.640 but that's a long ways away. We've still got a 0:14:11.640 --> 0:14:14.920 lot going on in Week three and what has just 0:14:15.000 --> 0:14:17.920 happened with the Eaglers. Since this is a trade, this 0:14:18.040 --> 0:14:21.200 trade discussion, I don't want to jump the gun, but 0:14:21.280 --> 0:14:23.200 Tevin Coleman is a guy that maybe you could be 0:14:23.240 --> 0:14:26.960 angling for that has a lot more value beyond this 0:14:27.040 --> 0:14:31.120 next month. While Freeman is out, clearly his value for 0:14:31.200 --> 0:14:33.160 this year has gone up, so it could hurt you, 0:14:33.200 --> 0:14:35.680 But Tevin Coleman is a guy in a keeper league 0:14:35.720 --> 0:14:37.560 that you need to look at. He's a starter in 0:14:37.600 --> 0:14:40.680 the league beyond this year. Yeah. Absolutely. And something I'm 0:14:40.680 --> 0:14:42.440 gonna bring up later on the show. Something we don't 0:14:42.440 --> 0:14:44.720 really hear a lot about when you're discussing trades is 0:14:45.200 --> 0:14:48.360 trying to buy players high, which seems like a weird concept. 0:14:48.440 --> 0:14:52.040 But if you trust that something a player is doing 0:14:52.160 --> 0:14:54.640 right now is going to be sustainable, but the owner 0:14:54.680 --> 0:14:57.080 who has him right now doesn't believe that it's sustainable, 0:14:57.520 --> 0:14:59.320 then maybe you do buy that player high, even if 0:14:59.320 --> 0:15:01.320 they're coming off with a week Like we'll talk about 0:15:01.360 --> 0:15:03.440 Kenny Golladay a little bit later on and how he 0:15:03.520 --> 0:15:05.720 might be a buy high because if his owner doesn't 0:15:05.720 --> 0:15:07.840 trust that, then maybe you could still get him add 0:15:07.840 --> 0:15:10.720 a discount to where he's not being valued correctly now. 0:15:10.800 --> 0:15:13.880 Tevin Coleman. If DeVonta Freeman, I mean he's dealing with 0:15:13.880 --> 0:15:15.920 a knee injury, he can easily come back and reinju 0:15:16.000 --> 0:15:19.040 this and Tevin Coleman is easily a top twenty running 0:15:19.040 --> 0:15:20.880 back for the rest of the season, So it's not 0:15:20.960 --> 0:15:23.320 just for the future, but I think that makes sense 0:15:23.320 --> 0:15:24.960 if you do play in a keeper or dynasty league, 0:15:24.960 --> 0:15:27.160 if you wanted to try and get Tevin Coleman, and 0:15:27.280 --> 0:15:30.560 by high a concept you don't really hear. I think 0:15:30.560 --> 0:15:33.120 that there's a possibility that you can do that, Mike. 0:15:33.200 --> 0:15:37.840 For the Eagles, they've signed Jordan's Matthews will run mainly 0:15:37.840 --> 0:15:39.600 in the slot. Now, I wanted to ask you this 0:15:39.680 --> 0:15:42.880 worries me a little bit, just because Nelson Aghilar we know, 0:15:43.080 --> 0:15:45.800 has typically done a lot of his damage out of 0:15:45.800 --> 0:15:47.320 the slot. Now they've been moving him all over the 0:15:47.320 --> 0:15:49.960 field and they typically do do that in Doug Peterson's offense. 0:15:49.960 --> 0:15:51.480 They can run him inside, they can run him on 0:15:51.520 --> 0:15:54.440 the outside. We've seen that consistently so far this year. 0:15:54.760 --> 0:15:58.480 But he is clearly clearly better as a slot receiver. 0:15:59.200 --> 0:16:03.080 Does this effect Nelson are negatively that Jordan Matthews is 0:16:03.120 --> 0:16:05.200 coming in and Alston Jeffrey is still on his way 0:16:05.200 --> 0:16:09.440 back as well. It's a good question something to consider. 0:16:10.520 --> 0:16:12.800 I just I think Ala is playing so well right now, 0:16:13.160 --> 0:16:16.520 and he's literally the most reliable receiving options not named 0:16:16.640 --> 0:16:18.840 zach Ertz that I think they just have to keep 0:16:19.560 --> 0:16:23.200 doing what they're doing with whether it's Wentz or you 0:16:23.280 --> 0:16:26.600 have to consider is there any potential chemistry change with 0:16:26.680 --> 0:16:30.560 Wins coming in from Folds? But I think Al's worst 0:16:30.640 --> 0:16:32.920 days are behind him. I think he's really developing well 0:16:32.960 --> 0:16:35.720 as a receiver. We saw it last year, and I 0:16:35.760 --> 0:16:37.720 think they're gonna want to continue to use him in 0:16:37.760 --> 0:16:39.680 that role, and I don't think they'll try to mess 0:16:39.720 --> 0:16:41.800 with the mojo that he has going on right now. 0:16:41.880 --> 0:16:45.400 I actually agree with you. He's wide receiver nineteen overall 0:16:45.520 --> 0:16:48.120 right now in Fantasy football, and we saw last year 0:16:48.160 --> 0:16:51.360 regardless of the quarterback, Carson Wentz likes to target Nelson 0:16:51.400 --> 0:16:54.680 a ton as well. They already have good chemistry together 0:16:55.040 --> 0:16:57.760 as well, So I'm not really worried about Jordan Matthews. 0:16:57.760 --> 0:17:00.120 I mean, the guy has had an extensive injury US 0:17:00.160 --> 0:17:03.000 three himself, so who knows how long he even stays healthy. 0:17:03.200 --> 0:17:05.000 The same thing goes for alshon Jeffrey, I'm not really 0:17:05.040 --> 0:17:07.399 worried about Nelson Aglor still a high end wide receiver 0:17:07.600 --> 0:17:09.680 three for me. But Mike, when we come back, we'll 0:17:09.680 --> 0:17:13.520 talk more about trade targets, potential buy lows, cell highs. 0:17:13.960 --> 0:17:15.680 You can call in later on the show eight four 0:17:15.760 --> 0:17:18.440 four eight four three six eight seven nine. Fantasy Best 0:17:18.440 --> 0:17:25.120 Friends Forever. Right after this Daily, Rhodo dot Com learned 0:17:25.160 --> 0:17:28.520 from the game's best DFS players, we don't just give 0:17:28.600 --> 0:17:33.440 you premier advice. We play every day, all major sports, 0:17:33.640 --> 0:17:37.840 all year round. We never stop industry leading DFS tools 0:17:37.840 --> 0:17:41.560 and custom projections, and now the Daily Rhodo dot Com 0:17:41.600 --> 0:17:45.399 optimizeer in minutes building, optimize line up for cash games 0:17:45.480 --> 0:17:49.480 and turneys learned from the game's best DFS players joined 0:17:49.560 --> 0:17:58.120 Daily Rhodo dot Com. Come back to the Fantasy best 0:17:58.160 --> 0:18:01.480 Friends Forever with the Fantasy superhero Frank Stamfle alongside special 0:18:01.520 --> 0:18:04.680 guest host Mike blew Ittt filling in for Greg Sussman. Today, 0:18:06.119 --> 0:18:07.800 I need to tell you that bet d s i 0:18:08.040 --> 0:18:11.000 is celebrating twenty years as the industry's biggest and safest 0:18:11.000 --> 0:18:13.960 betting site. They have great customer service and fast, easy 0:18:14.000 --> 0:18:17.639 payment of winnings. You can play virtually every sport at 0:18:17.680 --> 0:18:20.920 bet d s I with hundreds of wagering options, including 0:18:21.000 --> 0:18:24.520 live in game wagering on all major sporting events, where 0:18:24.560 --> 0:18:26.960 you can make your play at any time during the 0:18:27.000 --> 0:18:29.960 game using promo code f n t s Y. Bet 0:18:30.119 --> 0:18:32.840 d s I is offering up to one thousand dollars 0:18:32.880 --> 0:18:35.680 bonus on your first deposit, so use promo code f 0:18:35.880 --> 0:18:38.360 n t s Y and try bet d SI dot com. 0:18:38.400 --> 0:18:41.080 That's bet d s I dot com promo code F 0:18:41.240 --> 0:18:44.320 and T s Y. Head on over and start winning today. 0:18:44.840 --> 0:18:47.440 Do a quick exercise with you. What's Kevin Coleman landing 0:18:47.480 --> 0:18:50.640 spots cap space. We're gonna go from the most camp 0:18:50.720 --> 0:18:55.040 space all the way down. Tell me, stop me, stop me. 0:18:55.080 --> 0:18:56.760 On the teams where you think it's an option for 0:18:56.800 --> 0:18:59.040 them to sign him, Let's give me the exact Jerk 0:18:59.119 --> 0:19:01.560 McKinnon deal. What was like six for forty one millions 0:19:01.600 --> 0:19:03.760 something like that, something like that. I think you might 0:19:03.800 --> 0:19:10.320 get more, but ye know, plts makes sense. They got 0:19:10.359 --> 0:19:12.440 like a poopoo platyer of running backs right now. All 0:19:12.440 --> 0:19:15.439 three guys are drafted in the last twenty months or so. 0:19:16.119 --> 0:19:17.320 I don't know if they want to go out and 0:19:17.359 --> 0:19:19.280 pay somebody and get rid of the three guys that 0:19:19.280 --> 0:19:21.639 they just drafted. I think a lot depends, obviously on 0:19:21.680 --> 0:19:24.359 what happens for the rest of this season. Jordan Wilkins 0:19:24.440 --> 0:19:26.840 looked better than Marlon Mack last week, and that's something 0:19:26.840 --> 0:19:29.160 I expected coming into the year. I don't think Marlon 0:19:29.240 --> 0:19:30.840 Mack is really all that great. I think he's a 0:19:30.880 --> 0:19:32.840