WEBVTT - Five Things About the 2023 Open Championship with Kyle Porter

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:02.800
<v Speaker 1>I miss a green, for example, I'm already upset. When

0:00:02.840 --> 0:00:04.920
<v Speaker 1>I find my ball in the bunker, I'm really upset.

0:00:05.040 --> 0:00:07.720
<v Speaker 1>And when I find my ball in a egg Frida Egg,

0:00:07.840 --> 0:00:11.920
<v Speaker 1>the d Frida Egg, Frida Egg, Egg Bride Egg Lie,

0:00:11.960 --> 0:00:14.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm about ready to run off the golf.

0:00:34.720 --> 0:00:38.480
<v Speaker 2>Welcome back to another edition of the Frida Egg Podcast.

0:00:39.120 --> 0:00:43.240
<v Speaker 2>We are here final major, final men's major of the year.

0:00:43.560 --> 0:00:46.519
<v Speaker 2>I think this is a uh, it's crazy, it's a

0:00:46.800 --> 0:00:49.360
<v Speaker 2>I think the new schedule. This is what happens is

0:00:49.360 --> 0:00:52.360
<v Speaker 2>we kind of just all of a sudden poof major

0:00:52.440 --> 0:00:55.600
<v Speaker 2>season for the men is over. Obviously, we have the

0:00:56.040 --> 0:00:58.760
<v Speaker 2>Women's Open coming up at Walton Heath, which will be

0:00:58.840 --> 0:01:02.480
<v Speaker 2>really fun to watch. Also, so but we're here at

0:01:02.520 --> 0:01:07.040
<v Speaker 2>the Open Championship, so I'm not there, but it is

0:01:07.959 --> 0:01:12.800
<v Speaker 2>says a golf world are there. So we are doing

0:01:13.000 --> 0:01:16.080
<v Speaker 2>a lot of stuff on the Frida Egg this week. Obviously,

0:01:16.120 --> 0:01:20.240
<v Speaker 2>we have the daily newsletters. Feel free to go subscribe

0:01:20.360 --> 0:01:23.360
<v Speaker 2>on the website the Frida Egg dot Com to those

0:01:23.440 --> 0:01:27.480
<v Speaker 2>and you'll be getting daily newsletters this week. And today's

0:01:27.520 --> 0:01:32.039
<v Speaker 2>guest is Kyle Porter. Kyle writes for CBS. He also

0:01:32.080 --> 0:01:35.000
<v Speaker 2>has a book every year that comes out normal Sport.

0:01:35.360 --> 0:01:38.520
<v Speaker 2>I think it's coming out again this year. But he's

0:01:38.560 --> 0:01:43.680
<v Speaker 2>obviously a formative mind in the golf space, a wonderful

0:01:43.720 --> 0:01:47.919
<v Speaker 2>golf writer at CBS, and was really fun to chat

0:01:47.960 --> 0:01:51.480
<v Speaker 2>with him about this Open, about a myriad of topics,

0:01:51.680 --> 0:01:55.720
<v Speaker 2>some of the big names, whether the course, different things.

0:01:56.120 --> 0:01:59.920
<v Speaker 2>So without further ado, here is Kyle Porter with our

0:02:00.160 --> 0:02:04.160
<v Speaker 2>five things about the Open Championship. Thanks, and here.

0:02:03.960 --> 0:02:04.360
<v Speaker 1>We got.

0:02:09.120 --> 0:02:13.080
<v Speaker 2>All right, Kyle, I I understand you're going through the

0:02:13.120 --> 0:02:15.800
<v Speaker 2>fomo that I'm going through of not being in Scotland.

0:02:16.320 --> 0:02:20.920
<v Speaker 1>I am. I'm wearing my Crail England, England or Scotland.

0:02:20.919 --> 0:02:24.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm wearing my my Crail hat right now. Last year

0:02:24.639 --> 0:02:28.120
<v Speaker 1>was you know some of the photos that that that

0:02:28.200 --> 0:02:31.480
<v Speaker 1>you and I were in or part of, or you

0:02:31.520 --> 0:02:32.960
<v Speaker 1>know some some of the some of the rounds that

0:02:32.960 --> 0:02:35.519
<v Speaker 1>we played. They've been popping up, you know, people were

0:02:36.160 --> 0:02:40.880
<v Speaker 1>reposting them and you know, texting them and sharing them

0:02:41.400 --> 0:02:45.760
<v Speaker 1>and it reminded me of just what a that was.

0:02:45.800 --> 0:02:47.720
<v Speaker 1>My first time to Scotland was last year for the

0:02:47.840 --> 0:02:50.959
<v Speaker 1>for the Open, and it was just it blew away

0:02:51.160 --> 0:02:55.799
<v Speaker 1>whatever my expectations were. And yeah, I'm just I'm bombed

0:02:55.840 --> 0:02:58.040
<v Speaker 1>to not get to go back over. And it's such

0:02:58.080 --> 0:02:59.760
<v Speaker 1>a it's such a I think I heard you guys

0:02:59.760 --> 0:03:01.520
<v Speaker 1>talking about this the other day. It's such a magical

0:03:01.560 --> 0:03:05.640
<v Speaker 1>time of year with Wimbledon going on and the Open

0:03:05.800 --> 0:03:10.000
<v Speaker 1>and everything else. And it's fun to experience from afar,

0:03:10.040 --> 0:03:12.799
<v Speaker 1>but it's better to experience from up close. Yeah.

0:03:12.960 --> 0:03:17.000
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, how long the days are? I think that round

0:03:17.000 --> 0:03:19.600
<v Speaker 2>we played together at Ealy. We were playing till about

0:03:19.639 --> 0:03:23.080
<v Speaker 2>ten thirty at night. It was so dark when we

0:03:23.080 --> 0:03:25.560
<v Speaker 2>were finishing. And then we had that cab ride home.

0:03:25.600 --> 0:03:29.760
<v Speaker 2>But and it was the cab ride. There was even

0:03:29.800 --> 0:03:31.800
<v Speaker 2>But were you in the cab that that I was

0:03:31.800 --> 0:03:34.960
<v Speaker 2>in that was getting tasked down that country road? Was

0:03:35.080 --> 0:03:36.280
<v Speaker 2>the cab and other cab?

0:03:36.800 --> 0:03:38.760
<v Speaker 1>It was the cab. Whatever cab I was in, was

0:03:38.800 --> 0:03:40.320
<v Speaker 1>the one that Bacon was up front?

0:03:40.920 --> 0:03:41.520
<v Speaker 2>Yes, and.

0:03:43.320 --> 0:03:46.640
<v Speaker 1>He couldn't. The guy was speaking English, but he was

0:03:46.680 --> 0:03:48.640
<v Speaker 1>like Bacon.

0:03:49.400 --> 0:03:51.640
<v Speaker 2>A thick a very thick accent.

0:03:51.920 --> 0:03:54.760
<v Speaker 1>It was. It was incredible and Bacon at one point

0:03:54.840 --> 0:03:57.440
<v Speaker 1>you could you could see it shift where he was

0:03:57.480 --> 0:04:00.360
<v Speaker 1>like trying try and trying to understand, and then you

0:04:00.360 --> 0:04:02.600
<v Speaker 1>saw him shift to like I give up, I'm out,

0:04:02.800 --> 0:04:06.240
<v Speaker 1>Like I'm just gonna nod and pretend like I'm I'm

0:04:06.520 --> 0:04:09.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm understanding what this guy's saying. It was.

0:04:09.920 --> 0:04:12.840
<v Speaker 2>God, that was great. Great last year's opin, I mean,

0:04:13.520 --> 0:04:17.359
<v Speaker 2>all time tournament, all time trip that Saturday night out

0:04:17.480 --> 0:04:22.440
<v Speaker 2>before everybody was Rory's gonna get it done. Then then

0:04:22.760 --> 0:04:27.560
<v Speaker 2>the vandal Cam Smith just just stole stole the tournament,

0:04:27.680 --> 0:04:31.760
<v Speaker 2>broke his heart, broke broke all the media's heart.

0:04:32.520 --> 0:04:37.160
<v Speaker 3>I'm a contrarian, and I don't know if I want

0:04:37.240 --> 0:04:40.000
<v Speaker 3>to really like freely admit this, but like coming down

0:04:40.040 --> 0:04:42.160
<v Speaker 3>the background, I kind of was rooted for Cam just

0:04:42.160 --> 0:04:42.800
<v Speaker 3>for the h.

0:04:44.760 --> 0:04:45.760
<v Speaker 2>I felt it coming.

0:04:46.480 --> 0:04:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:04:47.080 --> 0:04:49.599
<v Speaker 2>I just as soon as he made the birdie on

0:04:49.680 --> 0:04:52.880
<v Speaker 2>eleven last year, I just you just were like, oh boy,

0:04:53.160 --> 0:04:59.080
<v Speaker 2>this guy is I mean, I still that those shots

0:04:59.080 --> 0:05:01.560
<v Speaker 2>he hit coming down on the stretch. I haven't rewatched it,

0:05:01.640 --> 0:05:05.920
<v Speaker 2>but they're about as vivid of shots in my in

0:05:05.960 --> 0:05:08.400
<v Speaker 2>my mind like that, you know, you have, like those

0:05:08.440 --> 0:05:12.640
<v Speaker 2>pictures that you remember and the camp Smith on the

0:05:12.640 --> 0:05:17.320
<v Speaker 2>back line of Saint Andrews that that that day are

0:05:17.839 --> 0:05:22.400
<v Speaker 2>about the most vivid golf tournament memories. I don't think

0:05:22.440 --> 0:05:24.080
<v Speaker 2>they're going away anytime soon.

0:05:24.320 --> 0:05:27.039
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think you know, it's interesting because when, as

0:05:27.080 --> 0:05:32.400
<v Speaker 1>people know, when you're out there, it's hard to see

0:05:32.640 --> 0:05:35.080
<v Speaker 1>multiple players if they're not in the same pairing, and

0:05:35.120 --> 0:05:37.880
<v Speaker 1>so we inevitably this happened in La We were watching

0:05:38.279 --> 0:05:41.080
<v Speaker 1>we were watching Wendham Clark on your phone, like literally

0:05:41.120 --> 0:05:44.320
<v Speaker 1>your phone was you were holding it out and people

0:05:44.360 --> 0:05:46.640
<v Speaker 1>were watching what Wyndham was doing two holes behind or

0:05:46.640 --> 0:05:49.320
<v Speaker 1>a hole behind from where we were. And I remember

0:05:49.360 --> 0:05:52.240
<v Speaker 1>that happening at the Open last year when Cam was

0:05:52.279 --> 0:05:56.320
<v Speaker 1>on seventeen because we were with Rory and Hobland or

0:05:56.360 --> 0:05:58.719
<v Speaker 1>I was. I don't remember where everybody else was, but

0:05:58.760 --> 0:06:02.200
<v Speaker 1>I remember seeing somebody's the video on somebody's phone because

0:06:02.200 --> 0:06:04.839
<v Speaker 1>you don't know what else is going on, and you

0:06:04.880 --> 0:06:08.520
<v Speaker 1>saw where Cam's ball was on seventeen after his second shot,

0:06:08.960 --> 0:06:10.960
<v Speaker 1>and in your head you're like, okay, that's a five,

0:06:11.720 --> 0:06:15.080
<v Speaker 1>so what like, how is this going to affect everybody else?

0:06:15.080 --> 0:06:17.520
<v Speaker 1>How's this going to play out? And then when he

0:06:17.560 --> 0:06:21.240
<v Speaker 1>makes four there, you're like, okay, well that's that's it,

0:06:21.360 --> 0:06:24.120
<v Speaker 1>like that's the tournament. And that was that was the

0:06:24.200 --> 0:06:28.719
<v Speaker 1>moment for me that he was like, oh this just

0:06:28.800 --> 0:06:31.479
<v Speaker 1>this happened, like this it's not going to happen. It

0:06:31.600 --> 0:06:35.039
<v Speaker 1>just did happen, and there's really no turning back, and

0:06:35.080 --> 0:06:38.320
<v Speaker 1>you have to you have to consider like how crushing

0:06:38.400 --> 0:06:42.400
<v Speaker 1>that is for everybody else involved, specifically Rory because he

0:06:42.440 --> 0:06:43.919
<v Speaker 1>was the one that was out in front, but also

0:06:43.960 --> 0:06:49.120
<v Speaker 1>for Hoveland. And it was a opens at Saint Andrew's

0:06:49.200 --> 0:06:54.040
<v Speaker 1>are you know, magnificent. But they're also weighty because they

0:06:54.080 --> 0:06:56.640
<v Speaker 1>only happen once every you know, five or six years,

0:06:56.640 --> 0:06:58.880
<v Speaker 1>and that that's a that's a pretty crushing thing to

0:06:58.880 --> 0:07:00.119
<v Speaker 1>have happened to you at the end.

0:07:00.839 --> 0:07:04.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean that's the fascinating thing about the open

0:07:04.400 --> 0:07:06.520
<v Speaker 2>at Saint Andrews, right, It is like it has this

0:07:07.240 --> 0:07:09.560
<v Speaker 2>it's kind of got the weight of a master's yep,

0:07:09.560 --> 0:07:13.000
<v Speaker 2>but without the annual aspect of it. I mean Cam

0:07:13.080 --> 0:07:17.480
<v Speaker 2>Young eagled eighteen. I mean I think that's the thing

0:07:17.520 --> 0:07:21.200
<v Speaker 2>that gets lost, and I mean he made the putt

0:07:21.360 --> 0:07:24.440
<v Speaker 2>after it was a foregone conclusion that Smith was making

0:07:24.640 --> 0:07:28.560
<v Speaker 2>Birdie on eighteen. But I have to say, like of all,

0:07:28.720 --> 0:07:32.080
<v Speaker 2>you know, all the shots like that Cam hit to win,

0:07:33.600 --> 0:07:36.840
<v Speaker 2>the routineness of the up and down for Bertie on

0:07:36.920 --> 0:07:40.840
<v Speaker 2>eighteen kind of gets glossed over. How the guy just

0:07:41.040 --> 0:07:44.760
<v Speaker 2>like literally just that was about a stone cold as

0:07:44.760 --> 0:07:46.960
<v Speaker 2>it gets right. It's not an easy up and down

0:07:47.000 --> 0:07:49.680
<v Speaker 2>by any means, but to hit it to like, hit

0:07:49.760 --> 0:07:51.920
<v Speaker 2>it to nothing where there's not even a shred of

0:07:51.960 --> 0:07:57.440
<v Speaker 2>doubt that he's making Birdie was just serial killer stuff.

0:07:57.680 --> 0:08:01.800
<v Speaker 2>So let's get in. Let's get into our typical exercise.

0:08:01.880 --> 0:08:04.880
<v Speaker 2>Five things about the Open This year will be at

0:08:04.960 --> 0:08:09.920
<v Speaker 2>Royal Liverpool Hoylake as a lot of people will call

0:08:09.960 --> 0:08:15.000
<v Speaker 2>it for short, what is your first thing or a

0:08:15.240 --> 0:08:16.280
<v Speaker 2>thing that you're looking for?

0:08:16.360 --> 0:08:18.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, let's let's keep it going with Cam actually because

0:08:18.640 --> 0:08:22.400
<v Speaker 1>he's on my list and it's it's partly because I

0:08:22.480 --> 0:08:25.160
<v Speaker 1>left him. Yeah, there you go. It's probably because of

0:08:25.240 --> 0:08:28.760
<v Speaker 1>last year obviously, because he won and nobody's repeated since

0:08:30.320 --> 0:08:33.640
<v Speaker 1>since twenty twenty three. Writer cup Padrick Harrington did back

0:08:33.679 --> 0:08:36.120
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and seven, two thousand and eight, did

0:08:36.120 --> 0:08:38.079
<v Speaker 1>you see him at the We're taping this on Friday,

0:08:38.080 --> 0:08:40.280
<v Speaker 1>but did you see he's in like sixth place at

0:08:40.280 --> 0:08:43.079
<v Speaker 1>the Scottish Open's what's going on?

0:08:43.320 --> 0:08:45.600
<v Speaker 2>Is he gonna be on the writer come team bombing

0:08:45.640 --> 0:08:46.000
<v Speaker 2>the ball?

0:08:48.559 --> 0:08:55.160
<v Speaker 1>It's unbelievable, Uh, Cam Smith repeat, listen like it's it's

0:08:55.200 --> 0:08:59.720
<v Speaker 1>been quiet because people don't watch live, and he's not.

0:09:00.280 --> 0:09:02.640
<v Speaker 1>He kind of only pops up at the majors and whatever.

0:09:02.679 --> 0:09:05.800
<v Speaker 1>But he's got I believe it's twelve straight excuse me,

0:09:05.840 --> 0:09:09.560
<v Speaker 1>eight straight top twelves worldwide, including live, but also including

0:09:10.360 --> 0:09:13.040
<v Speaker 1>a top ten at the PGA, a fourth place finish

0:09:13.080 --> 0:09:16.920
<v Speaker 1>at the US Open. His strokes game numbers, which include

0:09:16.960 --> 0:09:21.720
<v Speaker 1>live on data golf, are very good, like better than

0:09:21.760 --> 0:09:25.320
<v Speaker 1>brooks Kopka, better than kind of right there with Rory

0:09:25.400 --> 0:09:30.000
<v Speaker 1>and Victor Hovelin. And you know, the Open is the

0:09:30.080 --> 0:09:34.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of place where he doesn't he's he's a crooked driver,

0:09:34.800 --> 0:09:38.440
<v Speaker 1>right like he can get very I still remember that

0:09:38.559 --> 0:09:42.160
<v Speaker 1>drive he hit on sixteen at TPC Sawgrass when he

0:09:42.240 --> 0:09:44.719
<v Speaker 1>won a couple of years ago, and it was like,

0:09:45.080 --> 0:09:48.160
<v Speaker 1>that's not a drive that I've seen a major champion

0:09:48.280 --> 0:09:51.120
<v Speaker 1>hit very often when he looked it into the woods.

0:09:51.440 --> 0:09:55.839
<v Speaker 1>But you can create, I mean, you can creatively get

0:09:55.880 --> 0:09:57.720
<v Speaker 1>your way out out of stuff like that at the

0:09:57.720 --> 0:10:01.679
<v Speaker 1>Open Championship. So cam Smith me is a massive storyline

0:10:01.720 --> 0:10:03.840
<v Speaker 1>going in, not just because he's a defending champion, but

0:10:03.880 --> 0:10:06.120
<v Speaker 1>also because he's been playing kind of quietly some very

0:10:06.160 --> 0:10:07.080
<v Speaker 1>good golf recently.

0:10:07.760 --> 0:10:10.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean you're talking about a handful of the

0:10:10.520 --> 0:10:12.720
<v Speaker 2>best players in the world, right, And I think that

0:10:12.760 --> 0:10:16.240
<v Speaker 2>gets obscured a little bit for two reasons. One, as

0:10:16.280 --> 0:10:18.840
<v Speaker 2>he's self admitted, he kind of kind of took it

0:10:18.880 --> 0:10:22.480
<v Speaker 2>easy this winter partied and wasn't like guns of blazon

0:10:24.640 --> 0:10:27.360
<v Speaker 2>on the outset of the of the year. But also

0:10:27.559 --> 0:10:31.199
<v Speaker 2>because as you mentioned, he's kind of been wandering about

0:10:31.240 --> 0:10:34.440
<v Speaker 2>in obscurity on this on the Lift Tour, which you know,

0:10:35.160 --> 0:10:38.240
<v Speaker 2>it's it's the players have performed well. He's one of

0:10:38.280 --> 0:10:42.000
<v Speaker 2>them who's performed well in major championships, but it does

0:10:42.040 --> 0:10:45.600
<v Speaker 2>not you know, the the tour is still very obscure

0:10:45.720 --> 0:10:49.480
<v Speaker 2>in the sense of nobody really follows it. Yeah, uh

0:10:49.800 --> 0:10:55.400
<v Speaker 2>so yeah, I think cam uh this golf course. One

0:10:55.400 --> 0:10:58.400
<v Speaker 2>of my things that this ties into that I am

0:10:58.600 --> 0:11:02.400
<v Speaker 2>curious about is the golf course and how it holds

0:11:02.480 --> 0:11:07.240
<v Speaker 2>up with with driving, you know, like it's a golf

0:11:07.320 --> 0:11:10.120
<v Speaker 2>course that's known for like you really got to control

0:11:10.160 --> 0:11:13.400
<v Speaker 2>your ball out there. And I think it's it's fairly narrow.

0:11:13.480 --> 0:11:15.440
<v Speaker 2>It's a little bit more narrow than the old course.

0:11:16.800 --> 0:11:19.760
<v Speaker 2>It has a lot of like holes that move on

0:11:19.880 --> 0:11:23.520
<v Speaker 2>angles that makes it play more narrow, and I'm I'm

0:11:23.600 --> 0:11:27.960
<v Speaker 2>just curious with with where modern golf is going, where

0:11:28.000 --> 0:11:30.360
<v Speaker 2>it's just you know, hit driver, and this is I

0:11:30.360 --> 0:11:33.280
<v Speaker 2>think something that's fascinating with the Open in general. The

0:11:33.360 --> 0:11:38.600
<v Speaker 2>Open has kind of pushed back with firm conditions. I

0:11:38.640 --> 0:11:42.680
<v Speaker 2>think the unpredictable rough has an impact on this, and

0:11:42.720 --> 0:11:44.960
<v Speaker 2>then also just the weather that you can encounter.

0:11:45.120 --> 0:11:45.280
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:11:45.400 --> 0:11:49.559
<v Speaker 2>It's you can get in some really unbeneficial places hitting

0:11:49.559 --> 0:11:53.440
<v Speaker 2>it really close. But this golf course has a sharp

0:11:53.480 --> 0:11:57.920
<v Speaker 2>penalty for bunker misses. It is fairly narrow. It is

0:11:57.960 --> 0:12:00.520
<v Speaker 2>a golf course that you know, if you look at

0:12:00.520 --> 0:12:03.720
<v Speaker 2>Tiger and six and Rory's win, they drove the shit

0:12:03.760 --> 0:12:06.520
<v Speaker 2>out of the ball. Tiger did so that driving the

0:12:06.559 --> 0:12:10.280
<v Speaker 2>shit out of the ball was avoiding bunkers and placing

0:12:10.320 --> 0:12:11.360
<v Speaker 2>the ball in the fairway.

0:12:11.520 --> 0:12:11.640
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:12:12.080 --> 0:12:16.360
<v Speaker 2>He was playing from short grass. That was his big thing, right,

0:12:17.240 --> 0:12:19.720
<v Speaker 2>So I'm just curious how this golf course holds up.

0:12:20.040 --> 0:12:23.960
<v Speaker 2>What type of profile of players are we going to see.

0:12:24.440 --> 0:12:27.000
<v Speaker 2>You know, we we haven't seen it since twenty fourteen.

0:12:27.120 --> 0:12:31.080
<v Speaker 2>A lot has changed in golf since then, and I

0:12:31.120 --> 0:12:34.800
<v Speaker 2>think that's something that I'm fascinated by. And like Cam Smith,

0:12:35.240 --> 0:12:37.320
<v Speaker 2>I'm not gonna lie. He's my one and done pick.

0:12:37.760 --> 0:12:39.600
<v Speaker 2>You know, if I was picking somebody for the tournament,

0:12:39.679 --> 0:12:41.959
<v Speaker 2>it might be something different, Like I'm in a one

0:12:42.000 --> 0:12:44.920
<v Speaker 2>and done league that I've used almost every big name,

0:12:45.000 --> 0:12:49.120
<v Speaker 2>Like he's going to be my pick, But how's he profile?

0:12:49.360 --> 0:12:51.240
<v Speaker 2>And the thing about cam is like he's such a

0:12:51.240 --> 0:12:53.560
<v Speaker 2>good player. He profiles well everywhere, Like we saw him

0:12:53.559 --> 0:12:55.800
<v Speaker 2>at Okill top ten and he didn't even play well

0:12:57.120 --> 0:12:59.200
<v Speaker 2>and that wasn't a golf course that would you would

0:12:59.240 --> 0:13:02.040
<v Speaker 2>say fits the camp Smith profile. But I think the

0:13:02.080 --> 0:13:06.679
<v Speaker 2>thing that happens in abroad with camp Smith is that

0:13:06.800 --> 0:13:09.600
<v Speaker 2>the elements come out and it's it's about shot making

0:13:09.720 --> 0:13:12.840
<v Speaker 2>and there's some more artistry in the game, and I

0:13:12.880 --> 0:13:17.040
<v Speaker 2>think that's that really really benefits him. So that one

0:13:17.040 --> 0:13:20.680
<v Speaker 2>of mine is kind of around driving the golf ball

0:13:20.800 --> 0:13:25.040
<v Speaker 2>in Hoylake, which at Hoylake, which is an interesting intersection

0:13:25.120 --> 0:13:27.040
<v Speaker 2>with camp Do you think do you think what's your

0:13:27.080 --> 0:13:27.559
<v Speaker 2>next one?

0:13:27.679 --> 0:13:29.400
<v Speaker 1>I was gonna ask real quid. Do you think number

0:13:29.440 --> 0:13:31.680
<v Speaker 1>one is an example of that? With the internal ob

0:13:32.120 --> 0:13:33.360
<v Speaker 1>or are you a king? Ad?

0:13:33.440 --> 0:13:36.560
<v Speaker 2>So that would be the third hole in terms of

0:13:37.040 --> 0:13:39.440
<v Speaker 2>what I like about is because that's the third hole

0:13:39.480 --> 0:13:40.120
<v Speaker 2>for the tournament.

0:13:40.800 --> 0:13:42.640
<v Speaker 1>I think one on that it's one on the course

0:13:42.679 --> 0:13:46.800
<v Speaker 1>but third in the tournament, right, Yeah, exactly what I like.

0:13:47.240 --> 0:13:51.120
<v Speaker 1>That hole kind of presents it right. You're gonna get

0:13:51.160 --> 0:13:55.040
<v Speaker 1>these firm conditions, and there's holes that move in directions, right,

0:13:55.720 --> 0:13:58.440
<v Speaker 1>they aren't like straight holes, Yeah, a lot of them.

0:13:58.800 --> 0:14:01.800
<v Speaker 1>When they move into direct actions. With the firm conditions,

0:14:02.520 --> 0:14:06.880
<v Speaker 1>you're having to pick a line and distant, if that

0:14:06.920 --> 0:14:10.280
<v Speaker 1>makes sense. So with that whole especially, you need to

0:14:10.280 --> 0:14:12.280
<v Speaker 1>pick a line where you're going to cut some of

0:14:12.320 --> 0:14:12.760
<v Speaker 1>it off.

0:14:12.920 --> 0:14:15.320
<v Speaker 2>And if you don't pick it, if you're too safe

0:14:15.360 --> 0:14:17.480
<v Speaker 2>with your line, you're going to run through into the

0:14:17.559 --> 0:14:20.600
<v Speaker 2>rough right right if you're too aggressive, or if you

0:14:20.640 --> 0:14:23.440
<v Speaker 2>push it for right hand or you're going to end

0:14:23.520 --> 0:14:25.720
<v Speaker 2>up maybe ob So these guys are going to be

0:14:25.760 --> 0:14:28.920
<v Speaker 2>more conservative there. But yeah, that's a perfect example of

0:14:28.960 --> 0:14:34.120
<v Speaker 2>it where you know, the the the emphasis on driving

0:14:34.240 --> 0:14:38.120
<v Speaker 2>is created a lot by the way the fairway moves,

0:14:38.200 --> 0:14:42.440
<v Speaker 2>where you're starting to have to pick distance targets and

0:14:43.360 --> 0:14:47.120
<v Speaker 2>line targets. When a fairway's just straight, you just are

0:14:47.320 --> 0:14:50.320
<v Speaker 2>trying to hit it straight right, and you don't have

0:14:50.360 --> 0:14:52.480
<v Speaker 2>to worry about picking a distance because you know if

0:14:52.520 --> 0:14:54.960
<v Speaker 2>you hit it straight, it can go any distance, right

0:14:55.360 --> 0:14:58.720
<v Speaker 2>when a fairway like this is what Pete Die does,

0:14:58.800 --> 0:15:02.880
<v Speaker 2>I think really well, is that those Pete Die courses

0:15:02.920 --> 0:15:06.040
<v Speaker 2>and why they say timeless, I think to a certain

0:15:06.040 --> 0:15:09.080
<v Speaker 2>extent is because of the way the fairways move on angles.

0:15:09.120 --> 0:15:11.920
<v Speaker 2>A lot of times even straight holes have some angular

0:15:12.080 --> 0:15:15.000
<v Speaker 2>nature to them. And what it does is it really

0:15:15.040 --> 0:15:19.920
<v Speaker 2>creates a double decision rather than just a singular decision.

0:15:20.240 --> 0:15:20.880
<v Speaker 1>So I think.

0:15:20.760 --> 0:15:24.600
<v Speaker 2>That's one of the I think the fairway bunkers being

0:15:24.720 --> 0:15:29.320
<v Speaker 2>super penal, along with the way the fairways some of

0:15:29.080 --> 0:15:33.960
<v Speaker 2>the angles set up make this a really really tough

0:15:34.440 --> 0:15:39.280
<v Speaker 2>driving test, right, And I'm curious if it's going to

0:15:39.320 --> 0:15:43.440
<v Speaker 2>be if in the last you know, almost ten years,

0:15:44.200 --> 0:15:47.000
<v Speaker 2>with the way distances, how many long hitters there are

0:15:47.040 --> 0:15:50.360
<v Speaker 2>now are there? How is it going to work? That's

0:15:50.440 --> 0:15:52.200
<v Speaker 2>that's kind of one of the things I'm watching.

0:15:52.640 --> 0:15:56.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there's there's a whole I think it's like fourteen

0:15:56.400 --> 0:16:01.080
<v Speaker 1>on the back where Tiger hold out in what was

0:16:01.080 --> 0:16:06.880
<v Speaker 1>that twosy six five? Whenever you want that and uh,

0:16:08.520 --> 0:16:13.320
<v Speaker 1>it's it's it is set. What you're saying fits that.

0:16:13.480 --> 0:16:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Also because there's a there's a bunker that you can

0:16:15.840 --> 0:16:18.120
<v Speaker 1>cover or you can kind of go, it's gonna be

0:16:18.160 --> 0:16:20.680
<v Speaker 1>really interesting because I think in the past that's been

0:16:20.720 --> 0:16:23.240
<v Speaker 1>such an advantage for Rory Tiger guys that are so

0:16:23.400 --> 0:16:26.920
<v Speaker 1>long off the tee. But now do you bring eighty

0:16:27.000 --> 0:16:30.560
<v Speaker 1>guys into that, one hundred guys into that, you know,

0:16:30.640 --> 0:16:34.360
<v Speaker 1>will they challenge differently. I think that it's always interesting

0:16:34.400 --> 0:16:38.160
<v Speaker 1>it opens because it's there's so much variability in play.

0:16:38.200 --> 0:16:41.600
<v Speaker 1>But I think what you're saying perhaps even even more

0:16:41.640 --> 0:16:44.720
<v Speaker 1>so this year. You mentioned the weather. That's actually my

0:16:44.840 --> 0:16:50.120
<v Speaker 1>second one, and the reason is because I can't remember

0:16:50.640 --> 0:16:53.040
<v Speaker 1>the last time we had I mean, growing up, you

0:16:53.080 --> 0:16:56.160
<v Speaker 1>think about watching the Open, you think about some of

0:16:56.200 --> 0:16:59.960
<v Speaker 1>the just insane stuff that we saw on TV whenever

0:17:00.120 --> 0:17:02.920
<v Speaker 1>or the Open was being played, and you had these

0:17:02.960 --> 0:17:06.720
<v Speaker 1>crazy weather days and guys shooting eighty eighty five whatever.

0:17:07.760 --> 0:17:10.840
<v Speaker 1>We haven't really had that in the last several years. Right,

0:17:11.040 --> 0:17:16.120
<v Speaker 1>last year was perfect all four days. Twenty twenty one,

0:17:16.280 --> 0:17:19.159
<v Speaker 1>Royal Saint George's it didn't There was no win, There

0:17:19.359 --> 0:17:22.680
<v Speaker 1>wasn't a lot going on twenty twenty, there was no tournament.

0:17:23.160 --> 0:17:24.880
<v Speaker 1>You kind of got to go back to twenty nineteen

0:17:24.920 --> 0:17:27.840
<v Speaker 1>at Port Rush when it and it wasn't really it

0:17:27.880 --> 0:17:30.119
<v Speaker 1>was just kind of rainy. It wasn't like horrible weather,

0:17:30.840 --> 0:17:34.080
<v Speaker 1>but I would love to WESTI went no rain jack

0:17:34.119 --> 0:17:38.560
<v Speaker 1>at that day. Yeah, question it was was bold. That

0:17:38.600 --> 0:17:42.760
<v Speaker 1>was That was when Fleetwood started buying stuff out of

0:17:42.800 --> 0:17:48.560
<v Speaker 1>the gift shop and using like open umbrellas and headcovers.

0:17:47.920 --> 0:17:49.840
<v Speaker 2>And went he went full Sandy Lou.

0:17:50.119 --> 0:17:52.879
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah, Sandy might have bought it for him so

0:17:52.920 --> 0:17:56.280
<v Speaker 1>he can get recognized. But I want to see that

0:17:56.440 --> 0:18:00.520
<v Speaker 1>day or two days or whatever of really like, hey,

0:18:00.560 --> 0:18:03.320
<v Speaker 1>this is this is going to be horrible to play in.

0:18:03.600 --> 0:18:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Let's see can you can you get through this stretch?

0:18:06.960 --> 0:18:10.120
<v Speaker 1>Can the leaders get through this stretch? And you know

0:18:10.200 --> 0:18:13.560
<v Speaker 1>that that to me is part of the open Championship

0:18:13.640 --> 0:18:15.520
<v Speaker 1>test and we just we just haven't seen it in

0:18:15.600 --> 0:18:16.440
<v Speaker 1>several years.

0:18:16.760 --> 0:18:21.400
<v Speaker 2>Early forecasts predict a lot of rain, like rain every day.

0:18:21.600 --> 0:18:23.199
<v Speaker 1>Well I don't want that. I just want like one

0:18:23.280 --> 0:18:23.719
<v Speaker 1>day of it.

0:18:24.160 --> 0:18:26.320
<v Speaker 2>We'll see, we'll see how it is. I I know

0:18:26.359 --> 0:18:29.439
<v Speaker 2>it's very sandy there, so hopefully it'll still be pretty

0:18:29.480 --> 0:18:33.520
<v Speaker 2>firm and everything. I know it's a very sandy site

0:18:33.680 --> 0:18:36.760
<v Speaker 2>and they had a really dry couple months, but recently

0:18:36.800 --> 0:18:39.560
<v Speaker 2>it's been been pretty wet out there. But yeah, like

0:18:39.600 --> 0:18:42.000
<v Speaker 2>you want that brooks Kopka was it was it the

0:18:42.000 --> 0:18:49.000
<v Speaker 2>old course where yeah, so yeah, I I I think

0:18:49.040 --> 0:18:53.360
<v Speaker 2>the interest of this tournament and is like the weather, right,

0:18:53.480 --> 0:18:56.200
<v Speaker 2>that's it's always got to be a big story because

0:18:56.680 --> 0:19:02.080
<v Speaker 2>it is the the thing that is the is the test,

0:19:02.200 --> 0:19:06.240
<v Speaker 2>like it's kind of the last remaining I think it's

0:19:06.280 --> 0:19:12.439
<v Speaker 2>the last remaining thing that really really introduces variability to

0:19:12.520 --> 0:19:13.040
<v Speaker 2>the sport.

0:19:13.400 --> 0:19:16.960
<v Speaker 1>Yep, especially wind right, Like you talk to these guys

0:19:16.960 --> 0:19:19.040
<v Speaker 1>and it's like the one thing that they just can't

0:19:19.080 --> 0:19:22.199
<v Speaker 1>handle is wind, Like they don't they don't have an

0:19:22.200 --> 0:19:25.560
<v Speaker 1>answer for it. And that's where you start to see

0:19:25.600 --> 0:19:30.879
<v Speaker 1>like the true like flushers and ball strikers start to

0:19:30.920 --> 0:19:35.000
<v Speaker 1>emerge and that like I love that because it's it's

0:19:35.040 --> 0:19:37.840
<v Speaker 1>it's a variability that there's no answers for. Everything else

0:19:37.880 --> 0:19:40.560
<v Speaker 1>has an answer that you can't solve that, and I'd

0:19:40.600 --> 0:19:45.960
<v Speaker 1>love to see more of that presented by mother nature.

0:19:45.960 --> 0:19:48.480
<v Speaker 1>I guess in this tournament.

0:19:49.000 --> 0:19:52.720
<v Speaker 2>I mean once we once we moved a full simulator golf,

0:19:53.400 --> 0:19:56.000
<v Speaker 2>we'll be able to just put set the settings to

0:19:56.040 --> 0:19:56.880
<v Speaker 2>twenty mile an hour.

0:19:56.960 --> 0:20:00.199
<v Speaker 1>Whims sure are they gonna have fans in TGL Like

0:20:00.280 --> 0:20:03.560
<v Speaker 1>not people, but like the like actual fans just blowing

0:20:03.600 --> 0:20:05.520
<v Speaker 1>balls all over the place would be amazing.

0:20:05.760 --> 0:20:08.680
<v Speaker 2>Hey, they're trying to make the most real golf experience.

0:20:08.760 --> 0:20:09.400
<v Speaker 1>You're amazing.

0:20:09.560 --> 0:20:13.359
<v Speaker 2>I saw in a press release, so all right along

0:20:13.400 --> 0:20:16.119
<v Speaker 2>those lines, I think because of wind, because of weather,

0:20:16.200 --> 0:20:19.400
<v Speaker 2>because of firm conditions, because of some of the nuance

0:20:19.480 --> 0:20:23.399
<v Speaker 2>in the golf courses. I think this is the experience

0:20:23.520 --> 0:20:27.119
<v Speaker 2>is something I always watched for. I think the profile

0:20:27.359 --> 0:20:30.960
<v Speaker 2>of who is a favorite is much different at the

0:20:31.000 --> 0:20:35.399
<v Speaker 2>Open than everywhere else. Yeah, the average winter age of

0:20:35.440 --> 0:20:37.680
<v Speaker 2>the last eleven opens, do you know what it is?

0:20:38.359 --> 0:20:40.480
<v Speaker 1>I remember seeing this. I think it's like thirty six.

0:20:41.359 --> 0:20:44.640
<v Speaker 2>It's thirty four brought it the last two more cow

0:20:44.760 --> 0:20:47.359
<v Speaker 2>and Cam twenty five, twenty eight brought it down a

0:20:47.359 --> 0:20:47.840
<v Speaker 2>little bit.

0:20:47.720 --> 0:20:51.040
<v Speaker 1>Because she had to show through and Stenson, yeah, ZJ.

0:20:52.080 --> 0:20:55.040
<v Speaker 2>Darren Clark was forty one, Ernie was forty one, Phil

0:20:55.160 --> 0:20:58.720
<v Speaker 2>was forty two, Rory was twenty four, ZJ thirty nine,

0:20:58.800 --> 0:21:04.880
<v Speaker 2>Stenson forty, Speak twenty four, Mullinari thirty six, Lowry thirty three,

0:21:05.680 --> 0:21:10.160
<v Speaker 2>Markow twenty five, Campsmith twenty eight. Obviously, you know, if

0:21:10.160 --> 0:21:12.359
<v Speaker 2>you went with a median instead of an average, it

0:21:12.359 --> 0:21:15.720
<v Speaker 2>would be probably about thirty six. Yeah, I if I'm

0:21:15.760 --> 0:21:19.720
<v Speaker 2>just eyeballing it correctly, but yeah, so this is a

0:21:20.000 --> 0:21:22.000
<v Speaker 2>this is a golf course, it ties in with your

0:21:22.000 --> 0:21:25.119
<v Speaker 2>weather thing, or this is a tournament that favors you know,

0:21:25.200 --> 0:21:31.160
<v Speaker 2>the old and I'm wondering, I'm wondering, do we get

0:21:31.320 --> 0:21:32.560
<v Speaker 2>do we get a wiley guy?

0:21:33.160 --> 0:21:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Padrig? Padrig's in it, Padrig.

0:21:35.920 --> 0:21:39.199
<v Speaker 2>I mean I always like I'm I've said this on

0:21:39.320 --> 0:21:43.399
<v Speaker 2>other preview pods. I'm waiting, I'm waiting for Adam Scott

0:21:43.440 --> 0:21:46.399
<v Speaker 2>to get his second man. Yeah, I know, Sergio's not

0:21:46.480 --> 0:21:49.720
<v Speaker 2>in it. So like you know, you got like Justin Rose,

0:21:49.800 --> 0:21:52.760
<v Speaker 2>other people that would maybe profile in there. But I

0:21:52.800 --> 0:21:55.680
<v Speaker 2>think like Adam Scott's always the one that makes sense,

0:21:55.720 --> 0:21:57.800
<v Speaker 2>and like you look at his career, you look at

0:21:57.880 --> 0:22:00.840
<v Speaker 2>everything he's accomplished. It's like, God, he's got to have

0:22:00.920 --> 0:22:03.639
<v Speaker 2>two majors and obviously he kind of kicked one away.

0:22:04.040 --> 0:22:08.919
<v Speaker 2>Yeah in an open kind of yeah, maybe more than

0:22:09.400 --> 0:22:09.760
<v Speaker 2>kind of.

0:22:10.800 --> 0:22:12.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he but he's the guy, right like if

0:22:12.880 --> 0:22:16.320
<v Speaker 1>you look at and you do the thing with players

0:22:16.359 --> 0:22:17.440
<v Speaker 1>as a half major.

0:22:17.240 --> 0:22:21.919
<v Speaker 2>Right, yeah, well that was Garrett's idea. Okay, probably correct,

0:22:21.960 --> 0:22:24.920
<v Speaker 2>but it makes more sense when you do the half major, Well,

0:22:24.920 --> 0:22:25.720
<v Speaker 2>it totally does.

0:22:25.760 --> 0:22:29.160
<v Speaker 1>But I think he's the guy him and probably Sergio

0:22:29.240 --> 0:22:32.200
<v Speaker 1>that if you look at just what they've accomplished over

0:22:32.240 --> 0:22:35.199
<v Speaker 1>the course of their careers, it doesn't it doesn't really

0:22:36.840 --> 0:22:40.000
<v Speaker 1>add up or make sense that they only have one

0:22:40.040 --> 0:22:44.160
<v Speaker 1>major championship. And I think, you know, you could throw

0:22:44.240 --> 0:22:46.119
<v Speaker 1>Jason Day in there, but the thing about Adam Scott

0:22:46.160 --> 0:22:49.960
<v Speaker 1>compared to Jason Day is like the breadth of achievement, right,

0:22:49.960 --> 0:22:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Like he's he's been good, he's been elite for like

0:22:53.040 --> 0:22:54.160
<v Speaker 1>twenty years.

0:22:54.440 --> 0:22:59.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we're into the twenties, into the twenties, and they're

0:22:59.840 --> 0:23:04.280
<v Speaker 2>so few guys, yeah, in golf history that are relevant

0:23:04.320 --> 0:23:05.440
<v Speaker 2>for twenty plus years.

0:23:05.720 --> 0:23:08.639
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And I think that, you know, I think he

0:23:08.760 --> 0:23:12.800
<v Speaker 1>can take some encouragement from the last, well from the

0:23:12.840 --> 0:23:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Open the history you just read, but even the last

0:23:15.200 --> 0:23:17.960
<v Speaker 1>like Phil winning Kiowa and different things that have happened

0:23:17.960 --> 0:23:20.720
<v Speaker 1>over the last several years. I think Harry Player said

0:23:20.720 --> 0:23:23.520
<v Speaker 1>that somebody in their sixties is going to win a major.

0:23:23.680 --> 0:23:25.359
<v Speaker 1>So he also said the ball is going to go

0:23:25.400 --> 0:23:27.480
<v Speaker 1>like five hundred yards at the Masters this year. So

0:23:28.840 --> 0:23:32.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, but Adam Scott and Sergio to me

0:23:32.880 --> 0:23:35.200
<v Speaker 1>are the two guys that if you just look at

0:23:35.720 --> 0:23:39.240
<v Speaker 1>ball strikers and not just ball strike not just like

0:23:39.520 --> 0:23:43.840
<v Speaker 1>okay driving range hitters, but also winners globally global winners

0:23:43.960 --> 0:23:47.600
<v Speaker 1>like have won everywhere for a long time. They're the

0:23:47.640 --> 0:23:50.199
<v Speaker 1>two to me that really stand out ash as like

0:23:50.840 --> 0:23:54.719
<v Speaker 1>their career needs one more major to really kind of

0:23:54.800 --> 0:23:58.800
<v Speaker 1>make sense. Yeah, I would agree with that, And I

0:23:59.520 --> 0:24:02.880
<v Speaker 1>think like Adam Scott, you you look at his game

0:24:02.920 --> 0:24:06.879
<v Speaker 1>and it's still a game that for a week, you know,

0:24:06.960 --> 0:24:09.040
<v Speaker 1>he's not going to be in it every week.

0:24:09.200 --> 0:24:12.240
<v Speaker 2>He's not a top ten player anymore. I don't think

0:24:12.280 --> 0:24:16.640
<v Speaker 2>that's but he certainly has the capabilities to win one

0:24:16.680 --> 0:24:19.679
<v Speaker 2>of these, And I think, like what's interesting is like

0:24:19.720 --> 0:24:22.280
<v Speaker 2>a top ten player week in week out. I think

0:24:22.320 --> 0:24:25.159
<v Speaker 2>you can make an argument that in terms of majors,

0:24:25.200 --> 0:24:28.399
<v Speaker 2>he probably is like a top fifteen player no matter what,

0:24:29.119 --> 0:24:32.119
<v Speaker 2>top twenty player, just from from the sense of what

0:24:32.160 --> 0:24:35.000
<v Speaker 2>he can do and what he has done at majors

0:24:35.040 --> 0:24:37.080
<v Speaker 2>and how his game works. What do you what do

0:24:37.080 --> 0:24:38.200
<v Speaker 2>you got next?

0:24:38.680 --> 0:24:41.080
<v Speaker 1>I was just looking at his finishes. He's he doesn't

0:24:41.080 --> 0:24:42.560
<v Speaker 1>have do you know when his last top ten in

0:24:42.640 --> 0:24:46.679
<v Speaker 1>a major is by the way, wildgo hasn't been pretty

0:24:46.880 --> 0:24:50.560
<v Speaker 1>twenty nineteen Bell Reeve. The year after that, twenty nineteen

0:24:50.680 --> 0:24:55.320
<v Speaker 1>US Open. Where was twenty nineteen? Was that pebble?

0:24:56.359 --> 0:24:57.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, pebble Woodland.

0:24:59.040 --> 0:25:04.040
<v Speaker 1>It's a long time. My next thing is your boy

0:25:05.560 --> 0:25:12.359
<v Speaker 1>Jordan Speith, this is this is his best major? HPOY. Well, yeah,

0:25:12.520 --> 0:25:15.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean you've talked about him a lot. This is

0:25:15.800 --> 0:25:18.800
<v Speaker 1>his best major championship. I think that. I think when

0:25:18.840 --> 0:25:23.520
<v Speaker 1>people think of Jordan Speed, it's very easy to run

0:25:23.560 --> 0:25:28.080
<v Speaker 1>to Augusta, run to the Masters, run to everything that

0:25:28.119 --> 0:25:31.960
<v Speaker 1>he's done there, which makes sense, right, He's one one,

0:25:32.160 --> 0:25:34.879
<v Speaker 1>he probably should have two, maybe could have three, just

0:25:34.920 --> 0:25:36.960
<v Speaker 1>based on the way he's played there. But the reality

0:25:36.960 --> 0:25:39.240
<v Speaker 1>of that of Speed is that over the course of

0:25:39.240 --> 0:25:44.439
<v Speaker 1>his career, the Open has been really his best major.

0:25:44.840 --> 0:25:47.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, even when he was playing badly back in

0:25:49.840 --> 0:25:55.000
<v Speaker 1>twenties eighteen nineteen twenty, he was still like top twenty

0:25:55.040 --> 0:25:59.600
<v Speaker 1>in this in this major championship, like he's been And

0:25:59.640 --> 0:26:01.720
<v Speaker 1>it makes since he explained this a couple of years

0:26:01.720 --> 0:26:04.080
<v Speaker 1>ago at Royal St. George's, I think the quote was like,

0:26:05.040 --> 0:26:08.040
<v Speaker 1>you're not just hitting driving range shots at Palm Springs, right,

0:26:08.080 --> 0:26:13.320
<v Speaker 1>you have It engages the creativity of your mind. And

0:26:13.480 --> 0:26:16.240
<v Speaker 1>that's where I think he said, like, when I'm living

0:26:17.119 --> 0:26:20.679
<v Speaker 1>externally rather than internally, that's when I'm at my best,

0:26:20.840 --> 0:26:23.600
<v Speaker 1>Which makes total sense because if you watch Jordan's p

0:26:23.760 --> 0:26:25.840
<v Speaker 1>for ten minutes, you're like, yeah, that guy needs to

0:26:25.880 --> 0:26:29.600
<v Speaker 1>not be in his own head, and this tournament forces

0:26:29.680 --> 0:26:32.399
<v Speaker 1>him out of it and allows him to play with

0:26:32.400 --> 0:26:35.240
<v Speaker 1>a freedom that I don't think he plays with at

0:26:35.440 --> 0:26:39.080
<v Speaker 1>the Travelers or the RBC Heritage or you know some

0:26:39.160 --> 0:26:41.639
<v Speaker 1>of these other places the guys go to. So I

0:26:41.800 --> 0:26:45.080
<v Speaker 1>just this, to me, annually is his best chance to

0:26:45.119 --> 0:26:47.920
<v Speaker 1>win a major. He could tie Rory if he wins it.

0:26:48.240 --> 0:26:51.639
<v Speaker 1>He's not particularly playing great golf, but again, I just

0:26:51.680 --> 0:26:55.840
<v Speaker 1>don't know how much it matters how well he specifically

0:26:55.920 --> 0:26:57.480
<v Speaker 1>is playing coming into this tournament.

0:26:58.040 --> 0:27:02.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I would agree that this is this in in Augusta,

0:27:02.320 --> 0:27:06.480
<v Speaker 2>they profile for him, right, especially with with the way

0:27:07.200 --> 0:27:10.000
<v Speaker 2>the PGA and in the in the US Open of

0:27:10.320 --> 0:27:13.560
<v Speaker 2>historically set it up, and you see the skills rewarded.

0:27:14.080 --> 0:27:17.639
<v Speaker 2>You know, I just spent it's spent a long time.

0:27:18.040 --> 0:27:21.880
<v Speaker 2>That's that would be my my my concern, right, it's

0:27:21.960 --> 0:27:24.720
<v Speaker 2>just uh, you know, spent a long time, and I

0:27:24.800 --> 0:27:28.320
<v Speaker 2>think he's like a dramatically different person and player, uh

0:27:28.359 --> 0:27:29.160
<v Speaker 2>than he used.

0:27:28.960 --> 0:27:29.680
<v Speaker 1>To be, right.

0:27:29.880 --> 0:27:32.840
<v Speaker 2>I think that's the the unique thing about golf, right,

0:27:33.119 --> 0:27:40.240
<v Speaker 2>is that it is somewhat about athleticism, somewhat about a technique,

0:27:40.320 --> 0:27:43.280
<v Speaker 2>and somewhat about the mental side of the game, And

0:27:43.920 --> 0:27:48.240
<v Speaker 2>that's the one that is so vulnerable, right, And I

0:27:48.480 --> 0:27:50.280
<v Speaker 2>don't know, I I would love to see it.

0:27:50.840 --> 0:27:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Uh.

0:27:51.080 --> 0:27:57.600
<v Speaker 2>He obviously he brings brings a popularity and just a

0:27:57.840 --> 0:28:02.080
<v Speaker 2>his it's it's fun a watch right like it is,

0:28:02.480 --> 0:28:05.960
<v Speaker 2>it's it's a it's an exhilarating form of golf because

0:28:06.000 --> 0:28:09.560
<v Speaker 2>of there's a certain relatability with his game and and

0:28:09.680 --> 0:28:13.160
<v Speaker 2>craziness that I think, like any any average joke can

0:28:13.200 --> 0:28:16.919
<v Speaker 2>see in it. But I, uh, you know, I just

0:28:17.080 --> 0:28:22.720
<v Speaker 2>I wonder, I wonder, and I it'd be great to see.

0:28:22.800 --> 0:28:25.399
<v Speaker 2>But I just always go back to like, is have

0:28:25.520 --> 0:28:27.080
<v Speaker 2>we seen the best Jordan Speith?

0:28:27.240 --> 0:28:29.520
<v Speaker 1>And is there?

0:28:29.720 --> 0:28:30.600
<v Speaker 2>Can you get it back?

0:28:31.000 --> 0:28:33.159
<v Speaker 1>I think what's interesting about what you just said is

0:28:33.200 --> 0:28:37.800
<v Speaker 1>that it almost and this is everything I look at.

0:28:37.800 --> 0:28:40.720
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Carrington's quote at Kiowa is like this sort of

0:28:40.760 --> 0:28:44.240
<v Speaker 1>the source quote for talking about a lot of the

0:28:44.320 --> 0:28:48.480
<v Speaker 1>psychoanalysis stuff, like you know, like what he said there.

0:28:49.440 --> 0:28:53.080
<v Speaker 2>I just like experience. Experience, isn't it all? It's cracked

0:28:53.160 --> 0:28:56.720
<v Speaker 2>up to me to be with experience, you lose innocence.

0:28:56.880 --> 0:28:59.760
<v Speaker 1>I believe this. Yeah, And it's just like the perfect

0:28:59.800 --> 0:29:03.960
<v Speaker 1>way to describe so much Harrington talk. So I know

0:29:04.120 --> 0:29:07.120
<v Speaker 1>he might win, I might pick him from my one

0:29:07.200 --> 0:29:12.360
<v Speaker 1>and done. But the thing with speed, or not just

0:29:12.400 --> 0:29:15.560
<v Speaker 1>with speed, but with anybody, it's like, as you evolve

0:29:15.600 --> 0:29:18.720
<v Speaker 1>as a person, because we talk about these guys not

0:29:18.800 --> 0:29:21.520
<v Speaker 1>just as players but also as people. Right, as you

0:29:21.600 --> 0:29:24.680
<v Speaker 1>evolve as a person, it can work against you because

0:29:25.680 --> 0:29:29.480
<v Speaker 1>you're becoming a different person than you were three years ago,

0:29:29.600 --> 0:29:34.440
<v Speaker 1>five years ago, or ten years ago. And whether it's

0:29:34.520 --> 0:29:37.080
<v Speaker 1>noticeable or not, it's probably it probably isn't noticeable in

0:29:37.120 --> 0:29:39.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of ways because it's a daily thing. Right.

0:29:39.040 --> 0:29:42.600
<v Speaker 1>I think about your evolution as a person from before

0:29:42.640 --> 0:29:44.720
<v Speaker 1>you were married to now being married and having a

0:29:44.800 --> 0:29:47.240
<v Speaker 1>kid and having a business and all these different things,

0:29:47.240 --> 0:29:49.880
<v Speaker 1>Like you're such a different person than you were ten

0:29:49.960 --> 0:29:53.600
<v Speaker 1>years ago, and that can like really affect the way

0:29:53.640 --> 0:29:58.520
<v Speaker 1>that you think about everything. And the one thing that

0:29:58.640 --> 0:30:02.959
<v Speaker 1>Tiger never really he did which worked against him as

0:30:02.960 --> 0:30:05.840
<v Speaker 1>a person, but for him as a player, He didn't

0:30:05.880 --> 0:30:08.520
<v Speaker 1>really evolve as a person. He was kind of just

0:30:08.640 --> 0:30:14.600
<v Speaker 1>like the twenty year old dude for twenty years. Well,

0:30:14.720 --> 0:30:18.640
<v Speaker 1>you could make the argument that when he did evolve,

0:30:18.800 --> 0:30:24.920
<v Speaker 1>when his world came crashing down, is when he became beatable.

0:30:25.280 --> 0:30:29.479
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, right, like it it kind of there's there's Tiger

0:30:29.520 --> 0:30:32.880
<v Speaker 2>Part one and Tiger Part two and part two. You know,

0:30:33.040 --> 0:30:38.280
<v Speaker 2>after the fire hydrant is not what the level of

0:30:38.360 --> 0:30:41.440
<v Speaker 2>dominance Part one was. And obviously there are injuries and

0:30:41.520 --> 0:30:44.640
<v Speaker 2>all other all sorts of other things. But you know

0:30:44.880 --> 0:30:48.200
<v Speaker 2>that I think that moment probably dramatically changed him as

0:30:48.240 --> 0:30:48.640
<v Speaker 2>a person.

0:30:48.960 --> 0:30:53.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And it doesn't mean you can't win or that

0:30:53.720 --> 0:30:57.240
<v Speaker 1>you shouldn't evolve as a person. But I don't know

0:30:57.280 --> 0:31:00.480
<v Speaker 1>that we give it enough credit in terms of the

0:31:00.480 --> 0:31:03.840
<v Speaker 1>way that we think about guys. You know, and Rory,

0:31:03.960 --> 0:31:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Rory said this, He's like feels like I'm chasing my

0:31:06.560 --> 0:31:09.320
<v Speaker 1>first major. Like we give so much credit to like, oh,

0:31:09.320 --> 0:31:11.280
<v Speaker 1>he won four and it was like that was like

0:31:11.320 --> 0:31:14.880
<v Speaker 1>a three lifetimes ago, you know. And it doesn't mean

0:31:14.880 --> 0:31:18.600
<v Speaker 1>he can't do it, but it's it's a very it's

0:31:18.640 --> 0:31:21.600
<v Speaker 1>just such a different thing, especially when you have people

0:31:21.800 --> 0:31:24.800
<v Speaker 1>like speed like Rory like most of the top guys

0:31:24.840 --> 0:31:28.160
<v Speaker 1>right now that really try to evolve as people and

0:31:28.200 --> 0:31:30.040
<v Speaker 1>become different people than they used to be.

0:31:39.600 --> 0:31:44.360
<v Speaker 2>Now for a quick word from our sponsor, it's Club TFE. Listen.

0:31:44.640 --> 0:31:46.600
<v Speaker 2>This week we are we're gonna be pumping out a

0:31:46.600 --> 0:31:50.640
<v Speaker 2>bunch of content that's free through the newsletter, but also

0:31:50.800 --> 0:31:54.480
<v Speaker 2>we will have our membership humming subscribe some of the

0:31:54.560 --> 0:31:56.560
<v Speaker 2>news some of the stuff that we have coming up.

0:31:57.240 --> 0:32:01.200
<v Speaker 2>We do a weekly course profile where we dive in

0:32:01.240 --> 0:32:04.120
<v Speaker 2>to a golf course in great detail, give it an

0:32:04.120 --> 0:32:08.400
<v Speaker 2>egg score, tons of photography and they're usually you know,

0:32:08.600 --> 0:32:13.320
<v Speaker 2>one thousand to two thousand word profiles, big articles. This

0:32:13.440 --> 0:32:17.360
<v Speaker 2>week I am writing about North Barrack, So that's a

0:32:17.360 --> 0:32:20.520
<v Speaker 2>good one for to sign up. As a reminder, you

0:32:20.560 --> 0:32:23.520
<v Speaker 2>get access to the back catalog. So we've done one

0:32:23.520 --> 0:32:26.920
<v Speaker 2>a week for the entire year. So there are at

0:32:26.920 --> 0:32:31.720
<v Speaker 2>this point twenty seven or so profiles in there. I

0:32:31.800 --> 0:32:33.160
<v Speaker 2>think I did my math right.

0:32:33.960 --> 0:32:38.080
<v Speaker 1>So lots of stuff in Club TFE. Also coming we

0:32:38.160 --> 0:32:41.640
<v Speaker 1>have a routing video on bally Neil with Tom Doak,

0:32:42.320 --> 0:32:46.160
<v Speaker 1>so that's a video that's available only to CLUBTFE members.

0:32:46.880 --> 0:32:50.080
<v Speaker 1>And then we have a member guest coming up it's

0:32:50.160 --> 0:32:56.320
<v Speaker 1>at a notable course in central slash Northern California. Notable

0:32:56.400 --> 0:32:58.320
<v Speaker 1>architect did that one.

0:32:58.400 --> 0:33:01.320
<v Speaker 2>We will have a member guest that's obvious, only available

0:33:01.720 --> 0:33:05.400
<v Speaker 2>to Club TFE members. If you're interested in signing up,

0:33:05.760 --> 0:33:09.120
<v Speaker 2>go to the fried egg dot com slash membership and

0:33:09.240 --> 0:33:11.600
<v Speaker 2>it's one hundred and twenty dollars for the entire year.

0:33:12.040 --> 0:33:14.920
<v Speaker 2>You get a little gift with it as well, and

0:33:15.720 --> 0:33:18.760
<v Speaker 2>all the money goes to supporting what we're doing here.

0:33:18.880 --> 0:33:20.760
<v Speaker 2>So if you're intro, if you like what we do,

0:33:21.560 --> 0:33:26.520
<v Speaker 2>you appreciate what our written content, our growth is a company,

0:33:27.280 --> 0:33:29.479
<v Speaker 2>this is a great way to support us. Thank you,

0:33:29.640 --> 0:33:31.080
<v Speaker 2>and now back to Kyle Porter.

0:33:37.800 --> 0:33:41.600
<v Speaker 1>All Right, I got I got a couple of ways

0:33:41.600 --> 0:33:43.480
<v Speaker 1>I could go off of this by remaining.

0:33:43.600 --> 0:33:46.959
<v Speaker 2>Three things all fit off this, but you brought them up.

0:33:47.520 --> 0:33:50.080
<v Speaker 2>So let's, uh, let's talk a little bit about Rory here.

0:33:50.200 --> 0:33:54.880
<v Speaker 2>I think, I really I like you talk about evolution

0:33:55.160 --> 0:33:58.960
<v Speaker 2>and different aspects of life, and I think Rory has

0:33:59.080 --> 0:34:04.720
<v Speaker 2>uh in recent months moved into a new mentality of

0:34:04.840 --> 0:34:09.080
<v Speaker 2>how his spot in the professional game. I think obviously

0:34:09.120 --> 0:34:12.640
<v Speaker 2>he was a torch carrier, he's still very involved, but

0:34:12.880 --> 0:34:15.959
<v Speaker 2>where he kind of took on this this very out

0:34:15.960 --> 0:34:19.040
<v Speaker 2>front leadership role for the PGA Tour. I think a

0:34:19.080 --> 0:34:24.360
<v Speaker 2>lot of his energy was devoted to pleasing people, really

0:34:24.400 --> 0:34:28.240
<v Speaker 2>being you know, the voice of the tour, holding things

0:34:28.239 --> 0:34:34.120
<v Speaker 2>together through tumultuous time, but also like appealing to his peers, right,

0:34:34.680 --> 0:34:39.360
<v Speaker 2>and I think over the last with what's happened with

0:34:39.480 --> 0:34:41.920
<v Speaker 2>the deal and kind of some of the trust things

0:34:41.920 --> 0:34:44.480
<v Speaker 2>that have gone on with players and and everything, I

0:34:44.480 --> 0:34:46.719
<v Speaker 2>think he's kind of in a new new type of

0:34:46.760 --> 0:34:49.280
<v Speaker 2>headspace and you can see it with the way he's

0:34:49.320 --> 0:34:56.319
<v Speaker 2>he's handling media since since the framework agreement was put

0:34:56.320 --> 0:35:00.600
<v Speaker 2>in place, where it's it's short, the topics are are

0:35:01.160 --> 0:35:04.920
<v Speaker 2>stick to golf type topics for the most part, I

0:35:04.960 --> 0:35:11.840
<v Speaker 2>think he's got an edge about him that he hasn't

0:35:11.880 --> 0:35:15.319
<v Speaker 2>had in a while, and I really like it. I

0:35:15.320 --> 0:35:19.920
<v Speaker 2>think that we saw him play really great golf at LACC.

0:35:20.640 --> 0:35:24.560
<v Speaker 2>It was it was reminiscent of of the old course

0:35:24.640 --> 0:35:25.160
<v Speaker 2>last year.

0:35:25.360 --> 0:35:25.839
<v Speaker 1>But like.

0:35:27.560 --> 0:35:30.600
<v Speaker 2>His putter went really cold on the weekend and he

0:35:30.680 --> 0:35:34.160
<v Speaker 2>had opportunities. I think like that was more of a

0:35:34.239 --> 0:35:36.200
<v Speaker 2>fact of like you look at it and it's like wow,

0:35:36.480 --> 0:35:39.680
<v Speaker 2>like two putts go in. He had lots of chances

0:35:39.719 --> 0:35:43.480
<v Speaker 2>it's as completely different story. And obviously Wyndham Clark made

0:35:43.640 --> 0:35:47.080
<v Speaker 2>made the putts, but like that that was a situation

0:35:47.160 --> 0:35:49.680
<v Speaker 2>where Rory probably could have won that tournament by four

0:35:49.840 --> 0:35:54.120
<v Speaker 2>or five if if he if his putter wasn't ice cold.

0:35:54.360 --> 0:35:58.960
<v Speaker 2>And I just like, I like his mentality. I think

0:35:58.960 --> 0:36:02.120
<v Speaker 2>he's hitting driving ball great, which is an important thing

0:36:02.200 --> 0:36:05.040
<v Speaker 2>to do out here, and we know that, like he's

0:36:05.120 --> 0:36:08.480
<v Speaker 2>just on a different level with the driver. I think

0:36:08.960 --> 0:36:11.879
<v Speaker 2>that was something that I took away from from from

0:36:12.040 --> 0:36:15.440
<v Speaker 2>la Is just like how he can you know, long

0:36:15.520 --> 0:36:20.520
<v Speaker 2>players on the tour, he's routinely twenty past him. I

0:36:20.640 --> 0:36:23.680
<v Speaker 2>just think that mentally he's in the best place that

0:36:23.760 --> 0:36:26.480
<v Speaker 2>he's been in a long time with his golf game.

0:36:27.040 --> 0:36:31.000
<v Speaker 2>And I think that this is, uh, this is probably

0:36:31.040 --> 0:36:32.640
<v Speaker 2>setting up for a great week for him.

0:36:32.920 --> 0:36:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think I think what you said is correct,

0:36:35.360 --> 0:36:37.600
<v Speaker 1>and I think people will give a lot of I

0:36:37.640 --> 0:36:39.040
<v Speaker 1>guess this is what I was trying to say earlier.

0:36:39.040 --> 0:36:40.960
<v Speaker 1>People will give a lot of credit to Oh, he

0:36:41.040 --> 0:36:43.920
<v Speaker 1>won here in twenty fourteen, and you're like, well, that

0:36:43.960 --> 0:36:47.359
<v Speaker 1>matters a lot less than how he's like the fact

0:36:47.400 --> 0:36:50.040
<v Speaker 1>that he's playing very well right now, you know, like

0:36:50.239 --> 0:36:54.960
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't. It's a fun storyline. It doesn't. How the

0:36:54.960 --> 0:36:57.280
<v Speaker 1>fact that he won here in twenty fourteen doesn't really

0:36:57.960 --> 0:37:00.640
<v Speaker 1>affect whether or not he's going to win in twenty three.

0:37:01.000 --> 0:37:07.399
<v Speaker 1>I think the thing the thing for me that guy

0:37:07.480 --> 0:37:10.560
<v Speaker 1>he hit it so good in La like it to me.

0:37:10.640 --> 0:37:14.080
<v Speaker 1>It was so different than that final round at the

0:37:14.080 --> 0:37:14.720
<v Speaker 1>old course.

0:37:15.360 --> 0:37:16.560
<v Speaker 2>He wasn't as good.

0:37:16.800 --> 0:37:19.040
<v Speaker 1>No, he hit it okay, but he had all these

0:37:19.120 --> 0:37:23.640
<v Speaker 1>like thirty foot putts and eighteen foot putts and just

0:37:23.640 --> 0:37:28.360
<v Speaker 1>just a lot of kind of nothing. And I didn't

0:37:28.360 --> 0:37:30.319
<v Speaker 1>feel like he hit it as tight as he hit

0:37:30.360 --> 0:37:33.000
<v Speaker 1>it those last couple of days in LA. I mean,

0:37:33.000 --> 0:37:35.960
<v Speaker 1>that was just like a show, and it was. It

0:37:36.000 --> 0:37:38.840
<v Speaker 1>was awesome to watch Andy. The thing that really stood

0:37:38.880 --> 0:37:43.799
<v Speaker 1>out for me with him on that final day was,

0:37:43.920 --> 0:37:46.680
<v Speaker 1>and I had not heard this in the last nine years,

0:37:46.719 --> 0:37:51.239
<v Speaker 1>he said, when I win my next major right in

0:37:51.560 --> 0:37:54.799
<v Speaker 1>the in the in the press conference afterwards, and I

0:37:54.800 --> 0:37:57.640
<v Speaker 1>had not heard him talk so definitively about the fact

0:37:57.680 --> 0:37:59.719
<v Speaker 1>that he's gonna win another major, And I thought that

0:37:59.719 --> 0:38:03.960
<v Speaker 1>that was a real it was a real shift in

0:38:04.080 --> 0:38:08.800
<v Speaker 1>his at least from my perspective, for where he's where

0:38:08.800 --> 0:38:11.600
<v Speaker 1>he's at in his career because I think he this

0:38:11.680 --> 0:38:14.399
<v Speaker 1>is it's so weird I think for people to hear.

0:38:14.480 --> 0:38:18.279
<v Speaker 1>But I think he struggles with I don't maybe not

0:38:18.320 --> 0:38:21.319
<v Speaker 1>self confidence, but just like he has to be reminded, hey,

0:38:21.360 --> 0:38:24.840
<v Speaker 1>you're the I mean it's the it's the JP quote

0:38:24.840 --> 0:38:28.040
<v Speaker 1>where he said you're Rory Fan McElroy, right. He has

0:38:28.080 --> 0:38:31.200
<v Speaker 1>to be reminded of that almost, and I think there's

0:38:31.200 --> 0:38:36.120
<v Speaker 1>some like self awareness in there that is like, again,

0:38:36.200 --> 0:38:39.800
<v Speaker 1>a good thing is a human but you know, sometimes

0:38:39.880 --> 0:38:42.880
<v Speaker 1>bad as a player because you have to have somebody

0:38:42.920 --> 0:38:45.239
<v Speaker 1>reminding you, hey, you're Rory. You're Rory. You're Rory. You're

0:38:45.280 --> 0:38:47.680
<v Speaker 1>one of the twenty five thirty best guys of all time.

0:38:48.560 --> 0:38:51.000
<v Speaker 1>And I think he I think he believes that right

0:38:51.040 --> 0:38:54.239
<v Speaker 1>now and honestly, the way he's playing at the Scottish

0:38:54.239 --> 0:38:56.400
<v Speaker 1>I I honestly would not be surprised if he won

0:38:56.480 --> 0:38:58.120
<v Speaker 1>the Open by like five strokes.

0:38:58.480 --> 0:39:02.359
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm golf at every level. I say this to

0:39:02.520 --> 0:39:05.360
<v Speaker 2>like people that tell me how they suck at golf,

0:39:05.480 --> 0:39:09.280
<v Speaker 2>Like before, I'm like, listen, like everybody at every level

0:39:09.840 --> 0:39:13.319
<v Speaker 2>goes through periods where they think they suck golf. And

0:39:13.400 --> 0:39:16.480
<v Speaker 2>I think that's very true of the best players in

0:39:16.520 --> 0:39:20.040
<v Speaker 2>the world. It's very true of people like Rory Brooks

0:39:20.160 --> 0:39:23.640
<v Speaker 2>was very open about it on Netflix, you know. But

0:39:23.880 --> 0:39:26.920
<v Speaker 2>I think, like one of the other things, just to

0:39:27.040 --> 0:39:29.520
<v Speaker 2>kind of distill what I was getting at earlier a

0:39:29.520 --> 0:39:32.720
<v Speaker 2>little bit more, I think to be the best player

0:39:32.760 --> 0:39:36.000
<v Speaker 2>in the world, you have to be extraordinarily selfish with

0:39:36.040 --> 0:39:40.000
<v Speaker 2>your time, yep. And I think that that's something that

0:39:40.080 --> 0:39:44.880
<v Speaker 2>has shifted with Rory, is that he's being more selfish,

0:39:44.960 --> 0:39:48.840
<v Speaker 2>more judicious. He's not answering questions about everything he doesn't.

0:39:48.880 --> 0:39:52.200
<v Speaker 2>I think he cares less about what other people think

0:39:52.239 --> 0:39:55.240
<v Speaker 2>of him than ever before. And I think that while

0:39:55.440 --> 0:39:58.040
<v Speaker 2>might not be the best trait, you know, for life,

0:39:58.280 --> 0:40:02.040
<v Speaker 2>always it is the best trait to play the best golf,

0:40:02.560 --> 0:40:04.440
<v Speaker 2>to be the best golfer in the world. And I

0:40:04.440 --> 0:40:08.920
<v Speaker 2>think that it's an edge. It is a is a

0:40:09.239 --> 0:40:12.440
<v Speaker 2>important asset to have on the golf course.

0:40:13.200 --> 0:40:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Sean Zach and I were talking after the PGA because

0:40:17.440 --> 0:40:20.480
<v Speaker 1>obviously golf media's favorite thing to do is to dissect

0:40:20.560 --> 0:40:24.319
<v Speaker 1>why Rory's not winning majors, and we were joking about

0:40:24.360 --> 0:40:27.600
<v Speaker 1>how he should just impress conferences. Say you know what,

0:40:27.719 --> 0:40:30.680
<v Speaker 1>Andy like f you, I'm not answering that question, you know,

0:40:30.800 --> 0:40:34.400
<v Speaker 1>and just start like just start going off on people

0:40:34.920 --> 0:40:38.080
<v Speaker 1>and how that he would never do that obviously, but

0:40:38.760 --> 0:40:40.840
<v Speaker 1>in a in a way that's a little bit of

0:40:41.160 --> 0:40:44.560
<v Speaker 1>like his sort of where his mentality has gone a

0:40:44.560 --> 0:40:46.879
<v Speaker 1>little bit. I think, do you do you think it's

0:40:46.920 --> 0:40:50.120
<v Speaker 1>the is it the merger or the whatever, don't call

0:40:50.160 --> 0:40:53.840
<v Speaker 1>it a merger. Is it the deal that has pushed

0:40:53.880 --> 0:40:55.120
<v Speaker 1>him in that direction? Do you think?

0:40:56.400 --> 0:40:59.480
<v Speaker 2>I I'm not sure. I you know, I think I

0:40:59.480 --> 0:41:02.360
<v Speaker 2>think probably probably that I think that has something to

0:41:02.440 --> 0:41:08.279
<v Speaker 2>do with it. I imagine I imagine that there was

0:41:08.520 --> 0:41:11.640
<v Speaker 2>you know, he obviously was somebody that was was telling

0:41:11.680 --> 0:41:16.160
<v Speaker 2>people to be loyal, and I imagine I imagine that

0:41:17.160 --> 0:41:21.600
<v Speaker 2>after that happened, there was people that were upset with

0:41:21.719 --> 0:41:26.839
<v Speaker 2>him and and like you know, felt betrayed by him

0:41:26.920 --> 0:41:31.120
<v Speaker 2>and the tour, and and I think, like you know,

0:41:31.719 --> 0:41:35.600
<v Speaker 2>he was doing looking out forever for the best interests

0:41:35.600 --> 0:41:41.440
<v Speaker 2>of the sport, right, And I think I imagine that getting

0:41:42.000 --> 0:41:45.680
<v Speaker 2>heaps of blame placed on you, or any any blame

0:41:45.960 --> 0:41:49.200
<v Speaker 2>you know, from your peers, would would make you feel

0:41:49.280 --> 0:41:52.839
<v Speaker 2>pretty you know. And I think the media was tough

0:41:52.880 --> 0:41:56.200
<v Speaker 2>on him too, To be completely honest, some some media, right,

0:41:56.719 --> 0:41:59.000
<v Speaker 2>Like I think there was you know, there's a lot

0:41:59.040 --> 0:42:02.400
<v Speaker 2>of narratives. I just i'd imagined that that was a

0:42:03.880 --> 0:42:07.520
<v Speaker 2>that I think that probably had the biggest impact of

0:42:09.800 --> 0:42:12.719
<v Speaker 2>I don't you know. I wouldn't say like he's dramatically

0:42:12.840 --> 0:42:16.040
<v Speaker 2>different human being at this point, but I noticed there's

0:42:16.080 --> 0:42:18.960
<v Speaker 2>an edge to him that that hasn't I don't think

0:42:19.000 --> 0:42:19.800
<v Speaker 2>it's been around.

0:42:20.120 --> 0:42:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Would you would you say tough? Do you mean critical? Yeah?

0:42:23.600 --> 0:42:26.200
<v Speaker 2>I think there was there's some criticism. I think there was.

0:42:26.719 --> 0:42:29.399
<v Speaker 2>There's I think there's just that that like look at

0:42:29.560 --> 0:42:33.200
<v Speaker 2>look at this, like you know, live guys win type yeah, right,

0:42:34.440 --> 0:42:38.919
<v Speaker 2>And and I think like we don't know. I think

0:42:38.920 --> 0:42:43.560
<v Speaker 2>if we learned anything on this week was like we

0:42:43.640 --> 0:42:45.759
<v Speaker 2>have no clue how it's going to shake out.

0:42:46.840 --> 0:42:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I do think he does seem he seems hungrier

0:42:51.480 --> 0:42:57.280
<v Speaker 1>for a major than perhaps he's been at different times

0:42:57.280 --> 0:42:59.760
<v Speaker 1>in the past nine years. And I think that that's

0:43:00.440 --> 0:43:04.440
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't mean you're the win, but it's it's meaningful,

0:43:04.520 --> 0:43:05.239
<v Speaker 1>it's important.

0:43:06.360 --> 0:43:09.359
<v Speaker 2>The other event that happened right in this period that

0:43:09.400 --> 0:43:15.440
<v Speaker 2>we haven't talked about is the Brooks PGA win which passed.

0:43:15.840 --> 0:43:18.640
<v Speaker 2>You know, he doesn't you know Brooks has more majors

0:43:18.680 --> 0:43:22.560
<v Speaker 2>than him too. I think there's also probably that has

0:43:22.600 --> 0:43:26.239
<v Speaker 2>to be a factor in here. Like I imagine he

0:43:26.400 --> 0:43:32.520
<v Speaker 2>probably like five years ago, never imagined a peer passing

0:43:32.560 --> 0:43:39.120
<v Speaker 2>him in major championships other than I do.

0:43:39.680 --> 0:43:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Like I we don't we never get this in golf,

0:43:42.080 --> 0:43:43.640
<v Speaker 1>or we get it. We do get it, we get

0:43:43.640 --> 0:43:48.240
<v Speaker 1>it very rarely, but two sort of generational major winners

0:43:48.680 --> 0:43:50.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of going at it for a for a window.

0:43:51.280 --> 0:43:54.600
<v Speaker 1>If we got that, we if we got that with

0:43:54.600 --> 0:43:57.080
<v Speaker 1>Brooks and Rory for the next five years, if that

0:43:57.200 --> 0:43:59.400
<v Speaker 1>was like their window to kind of trade a couple

0:43:59.360 --> 0:44:02.280
<v Speaker 1>of majors back and forth, that would be awesome.

0:44:03.280 --> 0:44:07.080
<v Speaker 2>There's gonna be somebody new, you know, it's gonna pop

0:44:07.120 --> 0:44:08.440
<v Speaker 2>in there for sure.

0:44:08.480 --> 0:44:12.879
<v Speaker 1>But I mean their consistency, Like just look at their

0:44:12.920 --> 0:44:16.960
<v Speaker 1>consistency in majors, Like how often both of those guys have.

0:44:17.120 --> 0:44:20.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean Rory's like I think he's like top ten

0:44:20.520 --> 0:44:23.440
<v Speaker 1>and nineteen of his last thirty three or something like that,

0:44:23.520 --> 0:44:27.960
<v Speaker 1>thirty four Brooks similar numbers, maybe even better than that.

0:44:28.120 --> 0:44:31.319
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they're just they're always there. There, there will

0:44:31.360 --> 0:44:36.359
<v Speaker 1>always be new guys. But I just think it would

0:44:36.360 --> 0:44:39.480
<v Speaker 1>be awesome to see to see those those two guys

0:44:39.520 --> 0:44:42.359
<v Speaker 1>go back and forth. We give it another guy that's

0:44:42.360 --> 0:44:45.560
<v Speaker 1>probably gonna win. Yes, several majors we got.

0:44:46.200 --> 0:44:48.560
<v Speaker 2>I was about to go there too, and I think

0:44:48.719 --> 0:44:51.879
<v Speaker 2>we got the same name here, so I've guessed it's

0:44:51.920 --> 0:44:53.360
<v Speaker 2>another Longhorn.

0:44:53.760 --> 0:44:59.480
<v Speaker 1>It is, yes, And I don't know that anybody has

0:44:59.640 --> 0:45:04.719
<v Speaker 1>ever like this. This to me would be one of

0:45:04.760 --> 0:45:09.320
<v Speaker 1>the great you don't want to say wasted seasons because

0:45:09.640 --> 0:45:10.040
<v Speaker 1>he won the.

0:45:10.040 --> 0:45:13.040
<v Speaker 2>Play exactly what mine. This is exactly what mine is.

0:45:13.160 --> 0:45:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Yes, he won the players, he won Phoenix. It's not

0:45:15.719 --> 0:45:19.400
<v Speaker 1>a waste. He's been extraordinary this year. He's he's he

0:45:19.440 --> 0:45:21.719
<v Speaker 1>could win all the playoff events. He could go five

0:45:21.760 --> 0:45:23.960
<v Speaker 1>and oh at the Ryder Cup. I don't know. But

0:45:24.040 --> 0:45:28.040
<v Speaker 1>if you don't hammer out a major in a year

0:45:28.080 --> 0:45:32.520
<v Speaker 1>when you're hitting it at a level, that's like just

0:45:33.400 --> 0:45:36.359
<v Speaker 1>you're looking to the side and it's only Tiger. I mean,

0:45:37.239 --> 0:45:41.600
<v Speaker 1>he just he has I feel like he has to capitalize.

0:45:41.640 --> 0:45:43.560
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't have to, but it would be a it

0:45:43.600 --> 0:45:45.839
<v Speaker 1>would be a disappointment, I think when he looks back

0:45:45.920 --> 0:45:48.920
<v Speaker 1>to not capitalize on one of the great Tee de

0:45:49.000 --> 0:45:50.760
<v Speaker 1>Green seasons of the last twenty years.

0:45:51.680 --> 0:45:55.759
<v Speaker 2>My title for this one is Scottie and expectations, And

0:45:55.840 --> 0:45:59.760
<v Speaker 2>I think the toughest thing to fight in golf is expectations.

0:46:00.040 --> 0:46:04.600
<v Speaker 2>And I can't, I cannot this. This is going I

0:46:04.640 --> 0:46:06.680
<v Speaker 2>think this is going to be one of the toughest

0:46:06.719 --> 0:46:11.280
<v Speaker 2>tournaments mentally for him to play in his entire career.

0:46:11.840 --> 0:46:15.600
<v Speaker 2>Because of what you just laid out, he is having

0:46:15.800 --> 0:46:20.520
<v Speaker 2>statistically one of the greatest seasons we've ever seen in

0:46:20.560 --> 0:46:25.600
<v Speaker 2>the modern era. And if that isn't punctuated with a major,

0:46:27.120 --> 0:46:32.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's like it's honestly like Otani and Mike

0:46:32.600 --> 0:46:38.400
<v Speaker 2>Trout just toiling away in Anaheim where they can't field

0:46:38.800 --> 0:46:42.680
<v Speaker 2>a winning team, and it's like, Mike Trout is one

0:46:42.680 --> 0:46:47.719
<v Speaker 2>of the greatest baseball players of his generation and he's

0:46:47.760 --> 0:46:51.560
<v Speaker 2>never played a meaningful game, you know, and like it's

0:46:52.000 --> 0:46:56.680
<v Speaker 2>it goes Categorically, I don't think it's that level because

0:46:56.719 --> 0:47:01.719
<v Speaker 2>this is just one year, but like, this is one

0:47:01.760 --> 0:47:07.360
<v Speaker 2>of the greatest displays of consistency. It's everything everything you

0:47:07.440 --> 0:47:11.600
<v Speaker 2>want out of a superstar athlete performance in a year

0:47:11.719 --> 0:47:14.920
<v Speaker 2>where he's just been relevant every week, He's teed it

0:47:15.000 --> 0:47:21.800
<v Speaker 2>up effectively, and if it doesn't include a major, it's

0:47:21.840 --> 0:47:27.759
<v Speaker 2>it's mind boggling, especially considering the chances he's had, you know,

0:47:28.200 --> 0:47:32.239
<v Speaker 2>at the last two. Really, yeah, it is, And I

0:47:32.280 --> 0:47:34.719
<v Speaker 2>think it doesn't.

0:47:35.440 --> 0:47:37.960
<v Speaker 1>It's not the end of the world. But I I

0:47:38.000 --> 0:47:40.320
<v Speaker 1>think it's easy when you're in the middle of something

0:47:40.320 --> 0:47:43.000
<v Speaker 1>to say, oh, this thing that's happening is going to

0:47:43.080 --> 0:47:45.960
<v Speaker 1>last for a long time. And the reality is that

0:47:46.040 --> 0:47:47.960
<v Speaker 1>it's not like you don't.

0:47:47.880 --> 0:47:48.960
<v Speaker 2>A long off season.

0:47:49.040 --> 0:47:52.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah you don't get it's not like you get better

0:47:52.400 --> 0:47:56.640
<v Speaker 1>from here or nobody ever has right like it. I again,

0:47:56.719 --> 0:47:59.239
<v Speaker 1>like I the reason I talk about this a lot,

0:47:59.320 --> 0:48:02.640
<v Speaker 1>whether it's on my podcast or Twitter or whatever, and

0:48:02.680 --> 0:48:05.040
<v Speaker 1>people are like, we get it, and I'm like, I don't.

0:48:05.160 --> 0:48:09.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you do, because people are so

0:48:09.960 --> 0:48:17.320
<v Speaker 1>win and loss influenced in golf that I think sometimes

0:48:17.360 --> 0:48:19.880
<v Speaker 1>when you don't win, they can the people just can't

0:48:19.880 --> 0:48:25.040
<v Speaker 1>see past not winning. And it's like, no, this is

0:48:25.120 --> 0:48:28.080
<v Speaker 1>like Tiger in two thousand and eight or Tiger in

0:48:28.600 --> 0:48:33.000
<v Speaker 1>six or whatever whatever Tiger year you want to pick,

0:48:33.120 --> 0:48:35.680
<v Speaker 1>and there's like no other name to put next to it,

0:48:35.960 --> 0:48:40.160
<v Speaker 1>like it's it's only that. And so I think you

0:48:40.360 --> 0:48:42.879
<v Speaker 1>just you don't get that window forever you might get

0:48:42.920 --> 0:48:44.720
<v Speaker 1>it for two years. You might get it for five

0:48:45.040 --> 0:48:47.799
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, but it doesn't last forever. And if

0:48:47.840 --> 0:48:50.719
<v Speaker 1>we've if we've learned. You talk about this a lot

0:48:50.760 --> 0:48:54.399
<v Speaker 1>with DJ and Rory, Like, guys don't win majors. It's

0:48:54.480 --> 0:48:57.759
<v Speaker 1>very rare that guys win majors for a long time, right,

0:48:57.800 --> 0:49:01.160
<v Speaker 1>It's usually it's usually compressed. Look at Arnold Palmer, look

0:49:01.160 --> 0:49:04.680
<v Speaker 1>at Ben Hogan, look at yeah, all these guys they

0:49:04.719 --> 0:49:07.799
<v Speaker 1>win majors in a three four, five year period. And

0:49:07.880 --> 0:49:10.560
<v Speaker 1>if you don't do it, and some of it's luck

0:49:10.960 --> 0:49:14.880
<v Speaker 1>and some of it is just a couples whatever, whatever

0:49:14.920 --> 0:49:18.080
<v Speaker 1>it is, that time you never get that back. You know,

0:49:18.120 --> 0:49:21.640
<v Speaker 1>Scotty Scheffer changes and he's Jordan's speeth in five years

0:49:21.640 --> 0:49:24.040
<v Speaker 1>and he doesn't get back what he had. And so

0:49:24.160 --> 0:49:27.200
<v Speaker 1>I just I think this is a it's a really

0:49:27.280 --> 0:49:29.280
<v Speaker 1>important major for Scotty Scheffer's career.

0:49:29.840 --> 0:49:32.719
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, I think like one of the just to

0:49:33.040 --> 0:49:36.080
<v Speaker 2>you know, add one thing here is like we when

0:49:36.080 --> 0:49:41.160
<v Speaker 2>the schedule changed and it went to this extremely condensed

0:49:41.320 --> 0:49:45.480
<v Speaker 2>major season. And I say extremely condensed, they cut a

0:49:45.520 --> 0:49:49.560
<v Speaker 2>month out. One of the things that you you looked

0:49:49.560 --> 0:49:52.960
<v Speaker 2>at it and you saw is like, wow, somebody could

0:49:53.200 --> 0:49:56.560
<v Speaker 2>really get hot and go on a run and knock

0:49:56.640 --> 0:49:59.879
<v Speaker 2>these out, Like you know this, this is an advantage

0:50:00.080 --> 0:50:04.200
<v Speaker 2>to a hot hand. And what's crazy, especially with the

0:50:04.520 --> 0:50:07.279
<v Speaker 2>with the other elevated events in here, is that like

0:50:07.360 --> 0:50:10.680
<v Speaker 2>Shuffler's had the hot hand. And like it's hard to

0:50:10.719 --> 0:50:12.799
<v Speaker 2>say this because he won the players and he won

0:50:13.120 --> 0:50:16.359
<v Speaker 2>one waste management, but it doesn't feel like he's really

0:50:16.400 --> 0:50:19.319
<v Speaker 2>capitalized on the hot hand. Yeah, and this, you know,

0:50:19.480 --> 0:50:23.680
<v Speaker 2>it's you know, wins are I like, I really really

0:50:23.719 --> 0:50:28.719
<v Speaker 2>really really admire. I think consistency is the most underrated

0:50:29.480 --> 0:50:31.880
<v Speaker 2>stat Like I think there's there there needs to be

0:50:31.960 --> 0:50:35.880
<v Speaker 2>some form of consistency. It's what every great golfer is

0:50:35.920 --> 0:50:39.160
<v Speaker 2>trying to achieve when they go through changes, is like

0:50:39.480 --> 0:50:43.160
<v Speaker 2>how do I become more consistently great? Right, That's the

0:50:43.239 --> 0:50:45.799
<v Speaker 2>thing that you chase with golf. Every golfer at every

0:50:45.880 --> 0:50:48.319
<v Speaker 2>level is chasing it. Every golfer, Like I can't tell

0:50:48.320 --> 0:50:50.640
<v Speaker 2>you how many times somebody's like I shot my best

0:50:50.680 --> 0:50:53.040
<v Speaker 2>round and then the next round I shot like ninety five.

0:50:53.520 --> 0:50:56.040
<v Speaker 2>You know, it's like that's you know what what everybody's

0:50:56.120 --> 0:50:59.160
<v Speaker 2>chasing is, like how do I become more consistent? And

0:50:59.320 --> 0:51:04.960
<v Speaker 2>like the consistencies there, but like to have so you know,

0:51:05.480 --> 0:51:09.200
<v Speaker 2>the players feels forever ago and to have so few

0:51:09.400 --> 0:51:13.480
<v Speaker 2>big moments, to have so no wins really in the

0:51:13.480 --> 0:51:15.400
<v Speaker 2>meat of the season is crazy.

0:51:16.560 --> 0:51:19.400
<v Speaker 1>Don't you think it's weird in golf that inconsistency is

0:51:19.440 --> 0:51:25.960
<v Speaker 1>almost disproportionately rewarded compared to other sports. It's absolutely insane.

0:51:26.160 --> 0:51:28.560
<v Speaker 1>And I don't know what the what the solution is

0:51:28.600 --> 0:51:33.719
<v Speaker 1>because winning is so incredibly hard. Yeah, yeah, I mean

0:51:34.200 --> 0:51:40.879
<v Speaker 1>it's it's it's Sandy Lyles's career, right, He's got four

0:51:40.960 --> 0:51:43.160
<v Speaker 1>top tens at majors but two major wins.

0:51:43.960 --> 0:51:46.600
<v Speaker 2>Well, and this is not a shot. I am friends

0:51:46.640 --> 0:51:50.600
<v Speaker 2>with ZB. This is not a shot at ZB. It's

0:51:50.640 --> 0:51:54.840
<v Speaker 2>more of a comment about the system. ZB got inside

0:51:54.880 --> 0:51:57.040
<v Speaker 2>the top one hundred in the world rankings because of

0:51:57.080 --> 0:52:01.319
<v Speaker 2>his performance of travelers stacked Field. Yeah Field, you know,

0:52:01.480 --> 0:52:05.759
<v Speaker 2>best best finish of his career. But like he went

0:52:05.800 --> 0:52:08.520
<v Speaker 2>from way down to the top one hundred, and it

0:52:08.560 --> 0:52:10.800
<v Speaker 2>is all based off of you know, one week.

0:52:10.920 --> 0:52:14.279
<v Speaker 1>Right, yeah, And I mean you look at so take

0:52:14.600 --> 0:52:17.640
<v Speaker 1>take Sandy Lyle and Sergio Garcia or Adam Scott. Take

0:52:17.640 --> 0:52:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Adam Scott and Sandy Lyle. You would never you would No,

0:52:21.239 --> 0:52:25.480
<v Speaker 1>no rational person in golf would ever say Sandy Lesle

0:52:25.560 --> 0:52:28.640
<v Speaker 1>was a better golfer than Adam Scott, right and.

0:52:28.640 --> 0:52:32.359
<v Speaker 2>Yet and yeah, after saying yeah, I.

0:52:32.320 --> 0:52:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Don't I picked a bad There's other people that you

0:52:35.480 --> 0:52:40.960
<v Speaker 1>could pick, and yet Sandy Isle has more major wins

0:52:41.160 --> 0:52:44.480
<v Speaker 1>than Adam Scott. It's just like, I don't think the

0:52:44.560 --> 0:52:50.560
<v Speaker 1>answer is discounting major wins because they matter a ton.

0:52:51.400 --> 0:52:54.040
<v Speaker 1>I think the answer is like, and I don't know

0:52:54.080 --> 0:52:56.840
<v Speaker 1>how to promote it more. We've seen this in baseball,

0:52:56.840 --> 0:52:59.279
<v Speaker 1>the evolution of the way people have viewed statistics, right

0:52:59.320 --> 0:53:04.000
<v Speaker 1>where now a pitcher a pitcher's wins don't It doesn't

0:53:04.040 --> 0:53:05.919
<v Speaker 1>mean as much as it did one hundred years ago,

0:53:05.960 --> 0:53:10.680
<v Speaker 1>and it probably shouldn't because you're trying to measure performance

0:53:10.840 --> 0:53:12.920
<v Speaker 1>and not or you're trying to measure process and not

0:53:12.960 --> 0:53:16.799
<v Speaker 1>necessarily outcome. And I think that there needs to be

0:53:16.880 --> 0:53:23.480
<v Speaker 1>some better literacy around, like fan interaction with golf success

0:53:23.600 --> 0:53:27.839
<v Speaker 1>or statistics or whatever. And I just don't know when

0:53:27.920 --> 0:53:31.320
<v Speaker 1>that's going to come about, because it's just so wins

0:53:31.320 --> 0:53:34.839
<v Speaker 1>and losses dependent right now that I don't know. I

0:53:34.880 --> 0:53:38.200
<v Speaker 1>just wish, I wish there was more literacy around that Yeah,

0:53:38.239 --> 0:53:41.399
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what it is, but there is something there. It's, uh,

0:53:42.080 --> 0:53:42.600
<v Speaker 1>what do you have?

0:53:42.640 --> 0:53:43.560
<v Speaker 2>One left?

0:53:44.160 --> 0:53:46.960
<v Speaker 1>One left? We actually kind of talked about this at

0:53:47.000 --> 0:53:50.160
<v Speaker 1>the beginning with Padrig but I think there's real Ryder

0:53:50.160 --> 0:53:55.239
<v Speaker 1>Cup implications at this at this Open championship. And is

0:53:55.239 --> 0:53:57.759
<v Speaker 1>it the biggest story of the week. No, but it's

0:53:57.840 --> 0:54:01.879
<v Speaker 1>kind of the last chance for a it's it's it's

0:54:01.920 --> 0:54:05.120
<v Speaker 1>the opportunity. Like if Taylor Goog finishes in the top five,

0:54:05.520 --> 0:54:09.239
<v Speaker 1>I think he becomes a real Ryder Cup possibility, And

0:54:09.280 --> 0:54:12.040
<v Speaker 1>if he doesn't, then I don't think he is. And

0:54:12.080 --> 0:54:14.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't we know he's we know he's ready for

0:54:14.200 --> 0:54:17.440
<v Speaker 1>right well, I mean he's played in several so he

0:54:16.719 --> 0:54:22.480
<v Speaker 1>he will be he will be prepared. But I think

0:54:22.640 --> 0:54:25.759
<v Speaker 1>especially I was reading the Data Golf newsletter this week

0:54:25.760 --> 0:54:27.479
<v Speaker 1>and it was really good because he was talking about

0:54:27.480 --> 0:54:30.440
<v Speaker 1>how there's clarity on the European side other than that

0:54:30.480 --> 0:54:34.320
<v Speaker 1>bottom four that we talked about, but there's actually increasingly

0:54:34.440 --> 0:54:38.320
<v Speaker 1>less clarity on the American side. The closer the closer

0:54:38.360 --> 0:54:41.520
<v Speaker 1>we get, and so it's a big week for.

0:54:43.080 --> 0:54:48.000
<v Speaker 2>Your What if DJ finished the second I think I

0:54:48.040 --> 0:54:49.440
<v Speaker 2>think he would.

0:54:49.960 --> 0:54:51.919
<v Speaker 1>I think that would put him pretty close to being

0:54:51.960 --> 0:54:52.440
<v Speaker 1>on the team.

0:54:52.960 --> 0:54:55.560
<v Speaker 2>I do like a top five from DJ, Yeah, you do.

0:54:55.760 --> 0:54:57.560
<v Speaker 1>I think that, And I think that would be fair

0:54:57.840 --> 0:55:01.040
<v Speaker 1>because I think he went five and hour whistling straights,

0:55:02.360 --> 0:55:06.560
<v Speaker 1>you like, well liked, Yeah, And it's it's like, Okay,

0:55:06.680 --> 0:55:08.279
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the day, you're trying to beat

0:55:08.320 --> 0:55:10.880
<v Speaker 1>Europe for the first time in thirty years in Europe.

0:55:11.760 --> 0:55:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Do you want to have taken Denny McCarthy over there

0:55:16.000 --> 0:55:17.799
<v Speaker 1>and gone down? Or do you want to take DJ

0:55:17.880 --> 0:55:20.279
<v Speaker 1>over there and have gone down? You know, I think

0:55:20.320 --> 0:55:23.120
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a pretty easy answer at the end

0:55:23.120 --> 0:55:24.719
<v Speaker 1>of the day. But I just think there's a lot

0:55:24.880 --> 0:55:27.399
<v Speaker 1>like there's some Sam Burns implications Max Holme, but there's

0:55:27.400 --> 0:55:30.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of guys that are kinda you don't really

0:55:30.400 --> 0:55:32.080
<v Speaker 1>know what to make of them right now.

0:55:32.719 --> 0:55:36.680
<v Speaker 2>What in your mind, what has to happen for JT

0:55:36.960 --> 0:55:40.080
<v Speaker 2>not to get picked or is he a lock, like.

0:55:40.120 --> 0:55:42.040
<v Speaker 1>He has to have surgery or something.

0:55:42.480 --> 0:55:44.759
<v Speaker 2>Right, he's a lock no matter what. He could miss

0:55:44.760 --> 0:55:46.799
<v Speaker 2>the cut in every event the rest of the year.

0:55:46.920 --> 0:55:50.799
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it doesn't matter. It would be I think I

0:55:50.800 --> 0:55:53.640
<v Speaker 1>tweeted this a couple of weeks Ago'd be like not

0:55:53.719 --> 0:55:59.959
<v Speaker 1>taking Poulter. If he's upright, he does he rubs those guys.

0:56:01.280 --> 0:56:02.160
<v Speaker 1>I'll never forget.

0:56:02.600 --> 0:56:07.880
<v Speaker 2>I was just walking walking from one hole to another hole,

0:56:08.000 --> 0:56:10.520
<v Speaker 2>and I ran into some of the euro team at

0:56:10.600 --> 0:56:13.920
<v Speaker 2>Whistling Straits and one of them was like, did you

0:56:13.960 --> 0:56:17.080
<v Speaker 2>see what JT did? And I was like, yeah, I did.

0:56:17.480 --> 0:56:21.200
<v Speaker 2>He was like, the guy was very mad of this.

0:56:21.760 --> 0:56:24.280
<v Speaker 2>He was, I mean, this was hours after it happened.

0:56:24.360 --> 0:56:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Oh. The the way that they talk about him

0:56:28.600 --> 0:56:32.960
<v Speaker 1>is like it is, it's it's tough, like there's some

0:56:33.160 --> 0:56:36.480
<v Speaker 1>real animosity, not not like as a person, but some

0:56:36.560 --> 0:56:42.040
<v Speaker 1>real like competitive animosity that for that week. I think

0:56:42.160 --> 0:56:45.560
<v Speaker 1>I think tron At at Whistling Straits called him he's

0:56:45.600 --> 0:56:52.200
<v Speaker 1>like a duke point guard, which is great, so perfect,

0:56:52.360 --> 0:56:55.319
<v Speaker 1>it's so perfect. But to answer your question, yes, I

0:56:55.320 --> 0:56:58.279
<v Speaker 1>think JT, if he's able to swing a golf club

0:56:58.360 --> 0:57:00.120
<v Speaker 1>is going to be on the team. I don't I

0:57:00.160 --> 0:57:02.440
<v Speaker 1>don't know if you. I think whether I agree with

0:57:02.480 --> 0:57:04.600
<v Speaker 1>that or not, it's kind of irrelevant. I think the

0:57:04.719 --> 0:57:07.640
<v Speaker 1>names that you have to watch in terms of like

0:57:07.760 --> 0:57:12.120
<v Speaker 1>that are agents of chaos for the American team. Kurt

0:57:12.200 --> 0:57:15.839
<v Speaker 1>Kitty Yama, right, is he playing well? He hasn't been

0:57:15.880 --> 0:57:18.480
<v Speaker 1>playing well, he's playing bad. But if he starts playing

0:57:18.520 --> 0:57:22.200
<v Speaker 1>well again, right, Harris English has been really good lately. Yeah,

0:57:22.240 --> 0:57:22.640
<v Speaker 1>But then a.

0:57:22.640 --> 0:57:25.760
<v Speaker 2>Guy like Tony Tony fen Now who's way out that

0:57:25.960 --> 0:57:28.280
<v Speaker 2>like if he if he has a great week, yeah,

0:57:28.480 --> 0:57:30.480
<v Speaker 2>or a great couple of weeks, like you know, these

0:57:30.520 --> 0:57:32.800
<v Speaker 2>are the guys that then all of a sudden throw

0:57:32.840 --> 0:57:35.160
<v Speaker 2>in Jeopardy like then you. I mean like I don't.

0:57:35.280 --> 0:57:37.280
<v Speaker 2>I can't see a world that Ricky's not on the team,

0:57:37.400 --> 0:57:38.520
<v Speaker 2>no point no.

0:57:40.640 --> 0:57:45.320
<v Speaker 1>But I think there's some real like, Okay, in a vacuum,

0:57:45.840 --> 0:57:47.920
<v Speaker 1>do you do you if you take the names out

0:57:47.960 --> 0:57:51.360
<v Speaker 1>of it, are you taking Russell Henley or or or

0:57:51.400 --> 0:57:54.240
<v Speaker 1>Max Homa. I think you would take Russell Henley. But

0:57:54.360 --> 0:57:56.200
<v Speaker 1>you can't take the names out of it. You can't

0:57:56.200 --> 0:57:59.760
<v Speaker 1>erase the fact that Max one whatever four matches at

0:58:00.120 --> 0:58:03.000
<v Speaker 1>the President's Cup last year. You can't. There's just so

0:58:03.080 --> 0:58:05.520
<v Speaker 1>many different factors that go into it. And I think

0:58:06.680 --> 0:58:10.040
<v Speaker 1>I think there's some real like Ryder Cup implications at

0:58:10.040 --> 0:58:14.200
<v Speaker 1>this open for five or eight guys on the American side.

0:58:15.040 --> 0:58:17.560
<v Speaker 2>I think, like you look at the top nine points,

0:58:17.920 --> 0:58:20.120
<v Speaker 2>there's no way if you're in the top nine points

0:58:20.200 --> 0:58:24.800
<v Speaker 2>you get bypassed, yep, and then from there it's it's

0:58:25.200 --> 0:58:27.960
<v Speaker 2>your JT's doesn't seem like it's going to be in

0:58:27.960 --> 0:58:32.400
<v Speaker 2>that top nine and Ricky's not gonna is. Ricky could

0:58:32.440 --> 0:58:34.680
<v Speaker 2>get all the way up there, but like, you want

0:58:34.760 --> 0:58:38.880
<v Speaker 2>one of those two guys because they are as are

0:58:39.000 --> 0:58:42.000
<v Speaker 2>going to be on the team. Effectively, you really want

0:58:42.040 --> 0:58:44.240
<v Speaker 2>those two guys to get into the top nine.

0:58:44.360 --> 0:58:48.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. So I think just from a political standpoint, as

0:58:48.520 --> 0:58:52.440
<v Speaker 1>the captain, you wouldn't You're right, you wouldn't stray outside

0:58:52.480 --> 0:58:55.480
<v Speaker 1>of the top nine. I think it's easy for us

0:58:55.520 --> 0:58:58.480
<v Speaker 1>to look at stroke skinned or world ranking or whatever,

0:58:58.520 --> 0:59:03.640
<v Speaker 1>but politically you wouldn't. You there has there's more volatility

0:59:03.640 --> 0:59:05.560
<v Speaker 1>this year, as I Johnson was talking about this, because

0:59:05.600 --> 0:59:08.360
<v Speaker 1>the elevated events offer so much money, right, and so

0:59:08.400 --> 0:59:11.440
<v Speaker 1>there's more there's more noise because that's what they go on,

0:59:11.560 --> 0:59:15.800
<v Speaker 1>is how much money you've earned that translates into points.

0:59:16.080 --> 0:59:19.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what the FedEx uh exchange there is,

0:59:19.560 --> 0:59:23.720
<v Speaker 1>but uh, you're not gonna go out of the top nine.

0:59:23.760 --> 0:59:25.200
<v Speaker 1>So if you have guys that are outside of it,

0:59:25.280 --> 0:59:27.960
<v Speaker 1>like JT and Ricky, then you really only have one

0:59:28.360 --> 0:59:29.480
<v Speaker 1>spot that you're trying to.

0:59:29.440 --> 0:59:33.920
<v Speaker 2>Pick, right, Yeah, basically, I mean that's the thing right

0:59:34.600 --> 0:59:37.600
<v Speaker 2>where it gets tricky, right, I just think the discourse.

0:59:38.640 --> 0:59:40.880
<v Speaker 2>Let's just say Keegan doesn't play well, but he just

0:59:41.040 --> 0:59:42.720
<v Speaker 2>only falls just to nine.

0:59:42.880 --> 0:59:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah right.

0:59:44.160 --> 0:59:47.840
<v Speaker 2>You imagine the discourse around like Keegan Bradley not getting picked,

0:59:48.880 --> 0:59:51.320
<v Speaker 2>you know, when he was ninth in points and somebody

0:59:51.520 --> 0:59:55.000
<v Speaker 2>who's like in DJ getting picked or Taylor Groose getting picked.

0:59:55.080 --> 0:59:58.360
<v Speaker 1>Well, that's what I mean. That is to spot it's

0:59:58.400 --> 1:00:01.360
<v Speaker 1>political suicide. Is the cow right like you You're not

1:00:01.480 --> 1:00:03.040
<v Speaker 1>you wouldn't do that. And so.

1:00:04.520 --> 1:00:08.800
<v Speaker 2>Although ZJ doesn't seem to me like a risk taker.

1:00:10.480 --> 1:00:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Really just I might be I might be miscasting him,

1:00:14.800 --> 1:00:17.880
<v Speaker 1>but he just doesn't seem to be like it doesn't

1:00:17.920 --> 1:00:21.479
<v Speaker 1>feel like me like he's going to be somebody that's

1:00:21.520 --> 1:00:24.800
<v Speaker 1>trying to you know, the big miss step out the

1:00:24.800 --> 1:00:28.800
<v Speaker 1>big mites, don't scream, you know, take take risks and

1:00:29.600 --> 1:00:32.480
<v Speaker 1>put yourself out there. Uh yeah. So that that's my

1:00:32.600 --> 1:00:35.560
<v Speaker 1>last one is just on both sides. I mean we

1:00:36.200 --> 1:00:38.640
<v Speaker 1>were joking about it. If Potter Carrington finishes in the

1:00:38.680 --> 1:00:42.520
<v Speaker 1>top ten, I think you kind of playing your way

1:00:42.520 --> 1:00:45.560
<v Speaker 1>onto the Ryder Cup team. I mean legitate, like take

1:00:45.680 --> 1:00:47.840
<v Speaker 1>take his name, take his age out of it. You're

1:00:47.880 --> 1:00:51.880
<v Speaker 1>just I don't know. I think I think that's.

1:00:52.400 --> 1:00:54.160
<v Speaker 2>I can't do it because he didn't play in this

1:00:54.560 --> 1:00:59.560
<v Speaker 2>week senior major players. So, uh, Ludwig's gonna be on

1:00:59.600 --> 1:01:03.120
<v Speaker 2>the team, right, I don't think. So he's got to

1:01:03.160 --> 1:01:06.400
<v Speaker 2>do something. But I like, get he's talent.

1:01:06.480 --> 1:01:09.760
<v Speaker 1>I get he's talented, but like, like, what has he done?

1:01:10.960 --> 1:01:15.840
<v Speaker 2>Listen. I I'm all aboard the Ludwig hype train. But like,

1:01:16.040 --> 1:01:18.280
<v Speaker 2>at the same time, there needs to be a high

1:01:18.320 --> 1:01:21.840
<v Speaker 2>finish to glom onto. Here has to be one. He's

1:01:21.840 --> 1:01:22.800
<v Speaker 2>not in the Open, is he.

1:01:24.440 --> 1:01:27.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't think so, yeah, And I like, okay, let

1:01:27.120 --> 1:01:30.480
<v Speaker 1>me just like run down the finishes. T for it.

1:01:30.560 --> 1:01:32.960
<v Speaker 2>John Deere? Is that is that where you're gonna hang on?

1:01:33.280 --> 1:01:35.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, STEP's gonna get on the team from his

1:01:35.280 --> 1:01:36.920
<v Speaker 1>John Deere performance.

1:01:38.040 --> 1:01:40.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but there's a bout Sepstraca is a top thirty

1:01:40.720 --> 1:01:44.360
<v Speaker 2>player in the world. You know, Ludvig's three oh three.

1:01:44.600 --> 1:01:48.120
<v Speaker 2>I mean, so Rocket Mortgage T forty, Travelers T twenty four,

1:01:49.160 --> 1:01:53.680
<v Speaker 2>RBC Canadian Open T twenty five, Valspar T sixty one,

1:01:54.560 --> 1:01:58.720
<v Speaker 2>Arnold Palmer T twenty four, Hero Dubai Classic T seventy.

1:01:58.760 --> 1:02:03.800
<v Speaker 2>Those are his professional wins or professional starts. He didn't

1:02:03.800 --> 1:02:08.280
<v Speaker 2>win NCAA's. He won a lot of like college tournaments.

1:02:08.280 --> 1:02:09.040
<v Speaker 1>But I just.

1:02:10.600 --> 1:02:14.120
<v Speaker 2>Unless he does something I don't, you gotta do it

1:02:14.160 --> 1:02:16.200
<v Speaker 2>at the highest level and then you're gonna throw him

1:02:16.240 --> 1:02:20.640
<v Speaker 2>in the Ryder Cup. I get he's super talented. I'm

1:02:20.720 --> 1:02:26.920
<v Speaker 2>all for injecting youth, but like Victor Hobland when he

1:02:27.000 --> 1:02:30.680
<v Speaker 2>turned pro, had a better record, and I don't think

1:02:30.680 --> 1:02:33.080
<v Speaker 2>he would be considered for the Ryder Cup. I was

1:02:33.080 --> 1:02:34.120
<v Speaker 2>that a Ryder Cup year?

1:02:34.520 --> 1:02:34.600
<v Speaker 1>That?

1:02:35.080 --> 1:02:39.000
<v Speaker 2>Because No, wasn't there Matt Wolf. That wasn't a Ryder

1:02:39.040 --> 1:02:39.800
<v Speaker 2>Cup here right, No.

1:02:39.800 --> 1:02:42.440
<v Speaker 1>It was twenty nine. They turned pro after Pebble in

1:02:42.480 --> 1:02:46.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty nineteen at the Travelers and the Ryder Cup year

1:02:46.320 --> 1:02:49.920
<v Speaker 1>was twenty well it would have been twenty twenty. It

1:02:49.960 --> 1:02:51.280
<v Speaker 1>ended up being twenty twenty one.

1:02:51.920 --> 1:02:56.480
<v Speaker 2>So like with Hobland, for example, like I think the

1:02:56.520 --> 1:03:01.400
<v Speaker 2>finishes were were pretty we're better than that. And if

1:03:01.400 --> 1:03:03.920
<v Speaker 2>it was like he didn't even get his card like

1:03:04.520 --> 1:03:08.880
<v Speaker 2>ludvig Aberg at this point, wouldn't under the old before

1:03:08.960 --> 1:03:12.480
<v Speaker 2>PGA tour you changed, he wouldn't be getting his card.

1:03:12.640 --> 1:03:15.120
<v Speaker 2>He'd be getting close to seven starts at this point

1:03:15.520 --> 1:03:17.680
<v Speaker 2>and you'd be like, Okay, he's going to the corn

1:03:17.720 --> 1:03:20.240
<v Speaker 2>Ferry Tour next year. Yeah, And I don't think you

1:03:20.240 --> 1:03:23.400
<v Speaker 2>could put a player like that on the team unless no,

1:03:23.720 --> 1:03:27.000
<v Speaker 2>he could win, he could win Windham and then win

1:03:27.400 --> 1:03:30.200
<v Speaker 2>you know, a playoff event and like if he woulds

1:03:30.240 --> 1:03:34.160
<v Speaker 2>wind him like that's a real conversation then right, Yeah,

1:03:34.200 --> 1:03:36.920
<v Speaker 2>I think I don't think he's qualified for the playoffs. Like,

1:03:37.000 --> 1:03:38.760
<v Speaker 2>I just don't think. I don't see how you could

1:03:38.760 --> 1:03:39.600
<v Speaker 2>put him on the team.

1:03:39.840 --> 1:03:41.840
<v Speaker 1>I think the counter is what we talked about earlier.

1:03:41.840 --> 1:03:45.520
<v Speaker 1>There's there's just no nothing going on at the bottom.

1:03:45.600 --> 1:03:47.520
<v Speaker 1>And I think the other things, like you look at

1:03:47.560 --> 1:03:51.520
<v Speaker 1>some of those finishes he has. He's shooting like it's

1:03:51.720 --> 1:03:57.840
<v Speaker 1>very inconsistent, which is not It can work in your

1:03:57.880 --> 1:04:00.439
<v Speaker 1>favor at a Ryder Cup where you only play match

1:04:00.520 --> 1:04:04.000
<v Speaker 1>or two matches or whatever, and so if you have

1:04:04.120 --> 1:04:07.240
<v Speaker 1>a flash and you're I mean, they're not gonna pick

1:04:07.280 --> 1:04:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Luvig and play in like four matches, right, Like they

1:04:09.520 --> 1:04:13.560
<v Speaker 1>would play him in a couple and see if they

1:04:13.560 --> 1:04:15.120
<v Speaker 1>can get I think he's gonna be on the team.

1:04:15.160 --> 1:04:17.080
<v Speaker 1>I think they're gonna see if they can get something

1:04:17.160 --> 1:04:19.880
<v Speaker 1>out of him. When you put him in on that

1:04:20.040 --> 1:04:24.400
<v Speaker 1>stage and your top eight's kind of taken care of

1:04:25.200 --> 1:04:29.520
<v Speaker 1>and you're up, like your ceiling with him is just

1:04:29.560 --> 1:04:32.240
<v Speaker 1>so much higher than it is with the Aaron Ryes

1:04:32.280 --> 1:04:36.000
<v Speaker 1>and Alex Norns of the world that I think it.

1:04:36.560 --> 1:04:39.160
<v Speaker 1>I think you look at that ceiling and and and

1:04:39.240 --> 1:04:43.040
<v Speaker 1>pick that over everybody else having a higher four so

1:04:43.120 --> 1:04:43.640
<v Speaker 1>much so.

1:04:43.960 --> 1:04:46.520
<v Speaker 2>Aaron Ryce Slander, Yeah, he's just like the guy that

1:04:46.600 --> 1:04:50.600
<v Speaker 2>I get. He's stuck in your head. Hey, all right,

1:04:50.680 --> 1:04:53.720
<v Speaker 2>my fifth one. You know we talked Ryder cup now

1:04:54.560 --> 1:04:57.160
<v Speaker 2>it's uh, we've we've mentioned him. Ricky Fowler.

1:04:57.880 --> 1:05:00.440
<v Speaker 1>We do this all the time with Tiger and Phil

1:05:01.600 --> 1:05:03.760
<v Speaker 1>and we were like, is this his best.

1:05:03.520 --> 1:05:05.840
<v Speaker 2>Chance for a major championship?

1:05:06.920 --> 1:05:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Left?

1:05:07.600 --> 1:05:12.640
<v Speaker 2>Right is Rickyes? Is this Ricky's best chance for a

1:05:12.720 --> 1:05:18.800
<v Speaker 2>major ever? He's playing arguably like as good of golf

1:05:18.840 --> 1:05:21.560
<v Speaker 2>as he's played in the last seven he not arguably

1:05:21.600 --> 1:05:23.480
<v Speaker 2>he's playing the best golf he's played in the last

1:05:23.520 --> 1:05:28.160
<v Speaker 2>seven years of his entire career. He's not super long.

1:05:29.400 --> 1:05:32.800
<v Speaker 2>So I think that opened while he contended at lac

1:05:33.040 --> 1:05:37.720
<v Speaker 2>that was an atypical US Open course I think like

1:05:37.800 --> 1:05:40.320
<v Speaker 2>the US Open and the PGA doesn't really fit his

1:05:40.400 --> 1:05:43.080
<v Speaker 2>game great at this point in his career and with

1:05:43.240 --> 1:05:47.480
<v Speaker 2>where the game's gone, and that leaves the Masters and this,

1:05:47.800 --> 1:05:51.000
<v Speaker 2>and I think like the Open is probably best suited

1:05:51.040 --> 1:05:53.840
<v Speaker 2>for his game as a course that he almost won at.

1:05:54.720 --> 1:05:59.600
<v Speaker 2>And I just like, do is there another level of

1:05:59.680 --> 1:06:02.040
<v Speaker 2>Ricky follower than what we've seen this year? Is he

1:06:02.080 --> 1:06:03.280
<v Speaker 2>going to get better next year?

1:06:04.720 --> 1:06:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Is?

1:06:04.880 --> 1:06:07.080
<v Speaker 2>I guess the bet is like, is he a top

1:06:07.120 --> 1:06:11.960
<v Speaker 2>ten player in the world or is this year kind

1:06:12.000 --> 1:06:16.919
<v Speaker 2>of a one year thing? And does he settle into

1:06:16.960 --> 1:06:18.200
<v Speaker 2>being a top thirty player?

1:06:18.480 --> 1:06:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? That's that's interesting because the one area of his

1:06:21.160 --> 1:06:24.480
<v Speaker 1>game that hasn't come all the way back. I think,

1:06:24.480 --> 1:06:28.160
<v Speaker 1>if you look statistically is his is his driver. And

1:06:29.800 --> 1:06:34.080
<v Speaker 1>as guys get older, they typically don't become better and

1:06:34.160 --> 1:06:39.280
<v Speaker 1>better drivers, right, And so I don't know that he's

1:06:39.280 --> 1:06:43.400
<v Speaker 1>going to be a top ten guy with the consistency

1:06:43.440 --> 1:06:46.920
<v Speaker 1>that he was at age twenty four, twenty five, twenty six,

1:06:47.080 --> 1:06:49.800
<v Speaker 1>But I so, yeah, I think to answer your question,

1:06:49.800 --> 1:06:51.840
<v Speaker 1>I think he's more of a top twenty five type

1:06:51.840 --> 1:06:56.400
<v Speaker 1>guy than I'm like a top ten guy. But that

1:06:56.480 --> 1:06:59.160
<v Speaker 1>plays into what like, are you asking is this his

1:06:59.200 --> 1:07:02.720
<v Speaker 1>best chance ever going into like like the week, like

1:07:02.800 --> 1:07:03.720
<v Speaker 1>going into the event.

1:07:04.760 --> 1:07:07.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, I mean.

1:07:07.080 --> 1:07:09.640
<v Speaker 1>It depends on how you feel about the innocence and

1:07:09.720 --> 1:07:13.240
<v Speaker 1>experience thing, right, because I think there's a there's a

1:07:13.320 --> 1:07:16.880
<v Speaker 1>side of Fower, that there's a facet of Ricky Fowler

1:07:16.960 --> 1:07:20.760
<v Speaker 1>that did not exist eight years ago. Like he has

1:07:20.840 --> 1:07:24.600
<v Speaker 1>some real I think maturity and depth that he didn't

1:07:24.640 --> 1:07:27.479
<v Speaker 1>have before that most people don't have when they're twenty five.

1:07:28.040 --> 1:07:30.040
<v Speaker 1>But I don't know if that works for him or

1:07:30.080 --> 1:07:33.440
<v Speaker 1>against him in this instance, you know, m h.

1:07:33.960 --> 1:07:36.840
<v Speaker 2>I just think that I don't know if he'll be

1:07:37.840 --> 1:07:40.680
<v Speaker 2>he I think he's a first page favorite. I think

1:07:40.720 --> 1:07:44.640
<v Speaker 2>if you rattled off your ten favorites, he's in the

1:07:44.680 --> 1:07:45.440
<v Speaker 2>top ten.

1:07:46.120 --> 1:07:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Ahead of Harrington or behind him.

1:07:53.320 --> 1:07:57.440
<v Speaker 2>This is an episode about Padrick Harrington and the Open Championship,

1:07:57.480 --> 1:08:02.600
<v Speaker 2>but first and foremost Padrick Harrington. I like, honestly, if

1:08:02.640 --> 1:08:04.960
<v Speaker 2>you go down the favorite site, I think Scotti is

1:08:05.080 --> 1:08:09.440
<v Speaker 2>number one, right, I think, uh then I would just

1:08:09.560 --> 1:08:13.800
<v Speaker 2>I would probably go with the next three or Rory

1:08:13.840 --> 1:08:17.719
<v Speaker 2>Brooks in in ram in some order, yep, some form

1:08:17.760 --> 1:08:22.360
<v Speaker 2>of fashion at that point. At that point, like you

1:08:22.400 --> 1:08:27.160
<v Speaker 2>get into the cam Smith you get in, like I

1:08:27.200 --> 1:08:30.839
<v Speaker 2>think at that point, you're in like the Ricky zone,

1:08:31.040 --> 1:08:34.320
<v Speaker 2>and I don't and I honestly don't think will ever

1:08:35.439 --> 1:08:39.720
<v Speaker 2>be at another major where that that is where we're

1:08:39.840 --> 1:08:44.080
<v Speaker 2>placing Ricky Fowler. In terms of of odds, I don't

1:08:44.120 --> 1:08:46.960
<v Speaker 2>know what is like actual odds are, but they have

1:08:47.080 --> 1:08:48.840
<v Speaker 2>to be right around there.

1:08:49.160 --> 1:08:51.439
<v Speaker 1>Who do you think Ricky is more? Who do who

1:08:51.439 --> 1:08:53.519
<v Speaker 1>of these three players do you think is most likely

1:08:53.560 --> 1:08:57.400
<v Speaker 1>to win the Open? Ricky, Colin more Kala, and Victor Hoblin.

1:08:58.040 --> 1:09:00.519
<v Speaker 2>I think, like the only one that I think, like

1:09:00.680 --> 1:09:05.920
<v Speaker 2>Victor and Ricky right now would be the two that

1:09:06.160 --> 1:09:09.760
<v Speaker 2>I would put over Morikawa. But like I think, I mean,

1:09:09.800 --> 1:09:12.240
<v Speaker 2>I think that's a great question, right, And that's like

1:09:12.320 --> 1:09:18.080
<v Speaker 2>your second tier of guys. Yeah, so I think he's

1:09:18.120 --> 1:09:21.519
<v Speaker 2>like squarely, he's not, like he's not your top four,

1:09:21.720 --> 1:09:26.439
<v Speaker 2>which I think are pretty undisputable, but he's the next

1:09:26.479 --> 1:09:29.880
<v Speaker 2>group and I don't know if he'll ever get there

1:09:30.800 --> 1:09:35.040
<v Speaker 2>again for a major, right, Like I think he's having

1:09:35.600 --> 1:09:39.240
<v Speaker 2>he's just having a heater. He's on a heater. He's playing,

1:09:40.240 --> 1:09:42.200
<v Speaker 2>you know, some of the best golf of his career.

1:09:43.840 --> 1:09:46.880
<v Speaker 2>He's in a stratosphere in terms of the strokes game

1:09:47.000 --> 1:09:50.160
<v Speaker 2>numbers that I never thought he would get back to.

1:09:51.400 --> 1:09:53.840
<v Speaker 2>He's a top ten player in the world in the

1:09:53.920 --> 1:09:54.719
<v Speaker 2>last six months.

1:09:54.880 --> 1:09:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's the best he's ever hit his irons statistically,

1:09:58.439 --> 1:10:01.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean not, and it's not really that close, you know,

1:10:01.920 --> 1:10:04.840
<v Speaker 1>and if you look at if you look at driver,

1:10:04.920 --> 1:10:07.080
<v Speaker 1>it's actually one of the worst seasons he's ever had

1:10:07.160 --> 1:10:10.040
<v Speaker 1>in terms of strokes gained, which you know, we talked

1:10:10.040 --> 1:10:13.640
<v Speaker 1>about it in an Open championship can be it's not

1:10:14.000 --> 1:10:17.439
<v Speaker 1>maybe as it's different than it is on the PGA Tour.

1:10:17.560 --> 1:10:19.559
<v Speaker 1>So I don't I don't know how much you want

1:10:19.600 --> 1:10:21.280
<v Speaker 1>to how much credence you want to give to that,

1:10:21.320 --> 1:10:23.200
<v Speaker 1>but I do think that I think you're right. I

1:10:23.200 --> 1:10:25.519
<v Speaker 1>think there's a case to be made that this is

1:10:25.560 --> 1:10:28.920
<v Speaker 1>the best chance that Ricky Fower will ever have to

1:10:28.960 --> 1:10:31.360
<v Speaker 1>win a major championship. That that doesn't mean that he's

1:10:31.400 --> 1:10:33.920
<v Speaker 1>going like it could happen to where he loses this

1:10:34.000 --> 1:10:37.240
<v Speaker 1>week and then wins the US Open three years from now,

1:10:37.240 --> 1:10:40.400
<v Speaker 1>But that doesn't mean that his chance wasn't better going

1:10:40.479 --> 1:10:41.639
<v Speaker 1>into this week.

1:10:41.680 --> 1:10:45.320
<v Speaker 2>I think, yeah, like running into the tournament, yeah, like it,

1:10:45.720 --> 1:10:48.960
<v Speaker 2>you know, has ever anything ever aligned better?

1:10:49.479 --> 1:10:49.639
<v Speaker 1>Right?

1:10:49.680 --> 1:10:51.599
<v Speaker 2>And this is this could be a golf course too,

1:10:51.640 --> 1:10:55.680
<v Speaker 2>where power is not super it's more about control. And

1:10:56.160 --> 1:10:58.160
<v Speaker 2>this is these are all the things that I think

1:10:58.600 --> 1:11:00.840
<v Speaker 2>can play into it, right, Like this is a golf

1:11:00.880 --> 1:11:07.240
<v Speaker 2>course where it's about avoiding hazards, finding fair ways, you know,

1:11:07.680 --> 1:11:12.240
<v Speaker 2>Like I just I think like links golf fits his game, right.

1:11:12.320 --> 1:11:15.680
<v Speaker 2>It it brings the artistry, it brings the you know,

1:11:15.800 --> 1:11:20.240
<v Speaker 2>it brings the intangibles like it's in it skews older.

1:11:20.280 --> 1:11:23.720
<v Speaker 2>He would fit that, like he's right, he's thirty four. Yeah,

1:11:23.760 --> 1:11:25.519
<v Speaker 2>the average age of winner's thirty four.

1:11:25.840 --> 1:11:28.240
<v Speaker 1>Yep, him and him and Rory are both thirty four.

1:11:28.880 --> 1:11:31.599
<v Speaker 1>I yeah, it's a really good point. And I think,

1:11:31.760 --> 1:11:33.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, the thing I was thinking about after he

1:11:33.240 --> 1:11:36.160
<v Speaker 1>wanted Detroit was with with a lot of guys, when

1:11:36.200 --> 1:11:39.160
<v Speaker 1>they're when they're close to winning, close to winning, close

1:11:39.160 --> 1:11:41.840
<v Speaker 1>to winning, and then they finally win, you can almost

1:11:41.840 --> 1:11:44.559
<v Speaker 1>see the drop off coming. You can see the other

1:11:44.680 --> 1:11:47.800
<v Speaker 1>side of the roller coaster, right, And it does not

1:11:47.920 --> 1:11:50.800
<v Speaker 1>feel like that with him, you know. And and I

1:11:50.840 --> 1:11:53.640
<v Speaker 1>was talking about this on my pod about how like

1:11:53.760 --> 1:11:57.200
<v Speaker 1>it that felt like almost like a checkpoint, like there's

1:11:57.280 --> 1:11:58.920
<v Speaker 1>there's more to be had. And I don't know if

1:11:58.960 --> 1:12:01.120
<v Speaker 1>that means this Open or getting back to the top

1:12:01.160 --> 1:12:03.320
<v Speaker 1>ten in the world or whatever he does at the

1:12:03.360 --> 1:12:05.840
<v Speaker 1>Ryder Cup, but I don't That did not feel like

1:12:05.920 --> 1:12:09.479
<v Speaker 1>the sort of end of a journey that he was

1:12:09.800 --> 1:12:12.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of like, that didn't feel like the destination. It

1:12:12.000 --> 1:12:15.120
<v Speaker 1>feels like there's there's more for him to get to,

1:12:15.800 --> 1:12:19.160
<v Speaker 1>possibly this year, but potentially even even beyond that.

1:12:19.800 --> 1:12:25.000
<v Speaker 2>Any We're recording this on Friday afternoon and he's t

1:12:25.000 --> 1:12:28.240
<v Speaker 2>ten at the Scottish Open. Yeah, no matter what happens

1:12:28.280 --> 1:12:32.240
<v Speaker 2>this weekend. What that tells me is that the game

1:12:32.360 --> 1:12:35.840
<v Speaker 2>is in form. He's ready to go. He's like he's

1:12:35.920 --> 1:12:39.320
<v Speaker 2>locked in, Like I think what he believed and he

1:12:39.400 --> 1:12:42.599
<v Speaker 2>believes and the thing I think that he has now

1:12:42.720 --> 1:12:46.000
<v Speaker 2>after Rocket Mortgage. I hate saying this about you know,

1:12:46.160 --> 1:12:49.320
<v Speaker 2>Rocket Mortgage like this, but like there's real belief. There's

1:12:49.360 --> 1:12:52.640
<v Speaker 2>more belief than before the US Open, Like this is

1:12:53.080 --> 1:12:57.080
<v Speaker 2>major championships are all about a lot about belief, and

1:12:57.120 --> 1:13:01.080
<v Speaker 2>I think there's never been maybe more belief for Ricky

1:13:01.120 --> 1:13:02.920
<v Speaker 2>Fowlers since twenty fourteen.

1:13:03.280 --> 1:13:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Yep. Yeah, And it's crazy to think how much I

1:13:09.240 --> 1:13:11.080
<v Speaker 1>think you talk about this a lot. I know all

1:13:11.120 --> 1:13:12.880
<v Speaker 1>of us do. But how much of it is just

1:13:13.880 --> 1:13:16.799
<v Speaker 1>like luck, you know, a couple a couple of things

1:13:16.840 --> 1:13:19.960
<v Speaker 1>going like you have all these things that want that

1:13:20.040 --> 1:13:22.880
<v Speaker 1>line up. You're hitting it great, you believe all. You

1:13:22.960 --> 1:13:25.960
<v Speaker 1>hit some putt, you make some putts whatever, But then

1:13:26.080 --> 1:13:28.679
<v Speaker 1>like one or two things can go badly and there

1:13:28.800 --> 1:13:30.639
<v Speaker 1>that's the end of your You know, you don't win

1:13:30.760 --> 1:13:32.800
<v Speaker 1>because of that, and that is just that has to

1:13:32.840 --> 1:13:38.200
<v Speaker 1>be mentally infuriating. I was curious, who did you who

1:13:38.200 --> 1:13:39.840
<v Speaker 1>did you think was the best dressed out of that

1:13:39.840 --> 1:13:41.000
<v Speaker 1>that trio at Wimbledon.

1:13:43.680 --> 1:13:49.160
<v Speaker 2>It's a hard question. There's there's there's My college fuddies

1:13:49.760 --> 1:13:53.080
<v Speaker 2>have had a chain going. All of them were just disgusted,

1:13:53.280 --> 1:13:59.000
<v Speaker 2>you know, they're I think that the uh, I don't know.

1:13:59.479 --> 1:14:03.280
<v Speaker 1>I think it definitely wasn't speed. Well can we agree

1:14:03.280 --> 1:14:06.040
<v Speaker 1>on that, No, we can't. I actually think it was speed.

1:14:06.760 --> 1:14:07.839
<v Speaker 2>It just wasn't ironed.

1:14:08.720 --> 1:14:12.000
<v Speaker 1>The outcome was bad. His process was good because he

1:14:12.080 --> 1:14:14.960
<v Speaker 1>didn't The thing that he did was he didn't try

1:14:15.000 --> 1:14:19.240
<v Speaker 1>too hard. Like he he stayed within himself. He didn't

1:14:19.320 --> 1:14:22.120
<v Speaker 1>try to do too much. He didn't try to cover

1:14:22.360 --> 1:14:26.719
<v Speaker 1>like a two eighty, you know lake when he only

1:14:26.720 --> 1:14:30.559
<v Speaker 1>had a two sixty club. He just forgot to He

1:14:30.680 --> 1:14:33.760
<v Speaker 1>just forgot to iron the pants, which was which was

1:14:33.760 --> 1:14:34.240
<v Speaker 1>not great.

1:14:35.600 --> 1:14:39.599
<v Speaker 2>Honestly, I'm looking at the picture now, the pants. I mean,

1:14:39.680 --> 1:14:42.599
<v Speaker 2>I respect it because I just want to put this

1:14:42.640 --> 1:14:45.680
<v Speaker 2>out there. If people ever see me in public, my

1:14:45.760 --> 1:14:47.960
<v Speaker 2>pants will probably look like George speed Well.

1:14:47.960 --> 1:14:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Somebody was trying to tell me that it was he

1:14:49.800 --> 1:14:52.519
<v Speaker 1>was wearing linen pants and you can't iron linen. I

1:14:52.560 --> 1:14:55.519
<v Speaker 1>was like, I don't think those are linen pants.

1:14:55.880 --> 1:14:58.400
<v Speaker 2>Honestly, I think Rick looks the best.

1:14:58.640 --> 1:15:01.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, JT, there's JT's got a lot going on.

1:15:03.360 --> 1:15:07.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there is a lot going on. It's I mean,

1:15:08.360 --> 1:15:11.400
<v Speaker 2>I respect JT for for going for it.

1:15:11.640 --> 1:15:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, he's almost Yeah, he's it's like a bit.

1:15:15.360 --> 1:15:18.200
<v Speaker 1>He's like playing a playing a part.

1:15:18.600 --> 1:15:21.840
<v Speaker 2>That's who's your pick to win? Real quick, we're we're

1:15:22.680 --> 1:15:25.120
<v Speaker 2>way over time here for the Fridayke pod.

1:15:25.360 --> 1:15:27.120
<v Speaker 1>Well, I didn't know we had a time limit. We're

1:15:27.120 --> 1:15:30.040
<v Speaker 1>talking about Eric, Eric mcke and Jeff Green.

1:15:30.880 --> 1:15:35.000
<v Speaker 2>There's no time limit. There's there's just constraints put put

1:15:35.040 --> 1:15:36.080
<v Speaker 2>on by my own self.

1:15:36.160 --> 1:15:38.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I have picked him for a major

1:15:38.280 --> 1:15:42.800
<v Speaker 1>this year. I know I haven't, but I'm I'm I'm

1:15:42.920 --> 1:15:45.719
<v Speaker 1>ready to I'm ready to run it back, get hurt

1:15:46.240 --> 1:15:49.680
<v Speaker 1>all all that. Yeah, I think he's gonna win by

1:15:49.760 --> 1:15:52.960
<v Speaker 1>like five. I really, do you know?

1:15:53.400 --> 1:15:56.120
<v Speaker 2>My one and done pick is gonna be cam Smith.

1:15:56.400 --> 1:16:00.360
<v Speaker 2>I'm kind of starting to talk myself into Ricky. Yeah,

1:16:01.080 --> 1:16:04.639
<v Speaker 2>I think Scotty is gonna win. Okay, there's that Strokes

1:16:04.640 --> 1:16:08.880
<v Speaker 2>gained total stat or whatever about like two thousand and

1:16:08.960 --> 1:16:15.439
<v Speaker 2>six and twenty fourteen Tiger and Rory and I think

1:16:15.479 --> 1:16:19.160
<v Speaker 2>that I think Hoylake Hoyla could become the new Birkdale

1:16:19.680 --> 1:16:22.040
<v Speaker 2>where you say, like, look at the winners. That's like

1:16:22.080 --> 1:16:24.599
<v Speaker 2>one of the things like if Rory wins again, if

1:16:24.640 --> 1:16:28.240
<v Speaker 2>Scotty wins, if rom wins all of a sudden, I

1:16:28.280 --> 1:16:32.479
<v Speaker 2>think that the RODA discussion discourse needs to be like

1:16:32.560 --> 1:16:35.439
<v Speaker 2>the place that produces the winners is Hoylake, because then

1:16:35.439 --> 1:16:38.439
<v Speaker 2>you go back Peter Thompson. De Vicenzo obviously was a

1:16:38.479 --> 1:16:42.080
<v Speaker 2>great player, but Peter Thompson then they were just like

1:16:42.439 --> 1:16:45.080
<v Speaker 2>completely out of the ROTA for a long time. I

1:16:45.120 --> 1:16:48.640
<v Speaker 2>also want hearing more about the Dowie hole. I want it,

1:16:48.720 --> 1:16:52.080
<v Speaker 2>I want it back. I want the par three surrounded

1:16:52.120 --> 1:16:53.360
<v Speaker 2>by out of bounds back.

1:16:54.200 --> 1:17:00.479
<v Speaker 1>Oh, that would be amazing. The Bergdale list is so crazy, Well,

1:17:00.520 --> 1:17:02.960
<v Speaker 1>they got the problem is the most recent champions just

1:17:03.000 --> 1:17:05.880
<v Speaker 1>a guy. Oh my gosh, we've gone long enough for

1:17:05.920 --> 1:17:08.240
<v Speaker 1>you to say that that that needs we need to.

1:17:09.160 --> 1:17:11.680
<v Speaker 2>I just wanted to rile you up. That was that

1:17:11.800 --> 1:17:15.559
<v Speaker 2>was That was a joke. Just a guy came out

1:17:15.640 --> 1:17:16.600
<v Speaker 2>after Brickdale.

1:17:17.280 --> 1:17:19.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's true. That's a good point. He was the

1:17:19.400 --> 1:17:21.560
<v Speaker 1>best iron party in the world in twenty seventeen.

1:17:21.760 --> 1:17:25.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I've you know, at that point, it was where's

1:17:25.200 --> 1:17:27.760
<v Speaker 2>this going? That's what you know. That's my favorite. One

1:17:27.800 --> 1:17:31.240
<v Speaker 2>of my favorite things with majors is how the discourse

1:17:31.760 --> 1:17:34.840
<v Speaker 2>immediately after is like, is this guy gonna win eight?

1:17:36.080 --> 1:17:40.080
<v Speaker 1>I got like, I love Tron he's the best. After

1:17:40.520 --> 1:17:44.200
<v Speaker 1>after more Kala won Royal Saint George's two years ago,

1:17:44.560 --> 1:17:48.800
<v Speaker 1>he he legitimately said that more CaWO would win eight

1:17:48.960 --> 1:17:53.120
<v Speaker 1>major championships, and it's I get it. It's easy to do.

1:17:53.280 --> 1:17:57.559
<v Speaker 1>It's easy to to Uh. It's because it's so easy

1:17:57.560 --> 1:18:00.639
<v Speaker 1>to invasion, right, Like they've just won, like this guy's

1:18:00.760 --> 1:18:03.800
<v Speaker 1>But there's the beautiful thing about majors is there's only

1:18:03.840 --> 1:18:06.760
<v Speaker 1>so many of them, and there can't ever be more

1:18:06.760 --> 1:18:10.320
<v Speaker 1>of them. It's like the perfect It's the perfect amount

1:18:10.600 --> 1:18:13.760
<v Speaker 1>of what you want from the most important events of

1:18:13.800 --> 1:18:14.599
<v Speaker 1>the year for golf.

1:18:15.439 --> 1:18:20.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I completely agree. All right, Kyle, thank you for

1:18:20.439 --> 1:18:23.400
<v Speaker 2>coming on. This was delightful. People can find your work

1:18:23.400 --> 1:18:27.520
<v Speaker 2>at cbssports dot com. They can subscribe to your newsletter,

1:18:27.640 --> 1:18:33.280
<v Speaker 2>the Normal Sporter, and then they can also find you

1:18:33.360 --> 1:18:37.720
<v Speaker 2>on Twitter and Instagram. Is it Kyle Porter CBS.

1:18:37.800 --> 1:18:42.799
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, at both threads too. I've made them cans forgot

1:18:42.880 --> 1:18:46.400
<v Speaker 1>about Threads. I keep I check it every once in

1:18:46.439 --> 1:18:50.280
<v Speaker 1>a while. There's too many, too many places. I don't

1:18:50.320 --> 1:18:52.720
<v Speaker 1>have the time to double post now, even if it's

1:18:52.800 --> 1:18:55.800
<v Speaker 1>copy and paste. No, I'm good.

1:18:55.840 --> 1:18:57.479
<v Speaker 2>Have you has to just win out?

1:18:57.560 --> 1:19:01.400
<v Speaker 1>Have you gotten paid by Twitter yet? No? All these

1:19:02.000 --> 1:19:05.240
<v Speaker 1>all these all these creators getting getting paid for their

1:19:05.439 --> 1:19:08.080
<v Speaker 1>for their their viewer.

1:19:10.720 --> 1:19:11.160
<v Speaker 2>To golf.

1:19:11.800 --> 1:19:13.599
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I checked with I checked with some

1:19:13.640 --> 1:19:16.000
<v Speaker 1>of the I checked with Sally and he said he

1:19:16.000 --> 1:19:19.000
<v Speaker 1>he hasn't received it either, So maybe I don't know.

1:19:19.280 --> 1:19:23.000
<v Speaker 2>He wants to be worried about the Kardashians, not us

1:19:23.040 --> 1:19:24.920
<v Speaker 2>golf content creators.

1:19:26.640 --> 1:19:28.720
<v Speaker 1>Maybe the Live boys are getting it intant, Maybe they

1:19:28.760 --> 1:19:31.479
<v Speaker 1>live the live the live bots are getting it.

1:19:31.479 --> 1:19:40.360
<v Speaker 2>Instead absolutely something that probably is happening. They get They've

1:19:40.360 --> 1:19:47.120
<v Speaker 2>gotten everything so far. All right, we love I love

1:19:47.200 --> 1:19:51.519
<v Speaker 2>you live bots, you know. Yeah, I do not I

1:19:51.600 --> 1:19:56.519
<v Speaker 2>find it humorous. I just I enjoy laughing. My beads

1:19:56.520 --> 1:19:59.160
<v Speaker 2>of social media at this point are for purely, strictly

1:19:59.200 --> 1:20:02.080
<v Speaker 2>for humor. Find the humor and everything, even when.

1:20:01.920 --> 1:20:03.920
<v Speaker 1>It's very serious, it's great. I love it.

1:20:04.360 --> 1:20:08.080
<v Speaker 2>All right, Kyle, thank you, and we'll talk soon. I

1:20:08.120 --> 1:20:21.000
<v Speaker 2>can't believe the opens here. Thanks Andy, thank you for

1:20:21.120 --> 1:20:25.960
<v Speaker 2>listening to another edition of the Friday Podcast. Today's episode

1:20:26.640 --> 1:20:30.640
<v Speaker 2>was edited by Matt Russ's Thank you, Matt. Matt's been

1:20:30.720 --> 1:20:33.320
<v Speaker 2>killing it with our social media channels. If you don't,

1:20:33.640 --> 1:20:36.960
<v Speaker 2>if you aren't on social media, I really applaud you.

1:20:37.080 --> 1:20:39.640
<v Speaker 2>That's an amazing thing. If you're on Instagram and you

1:20:39.680 --> 1:20:43.960
<v Speaker 2>don't follow us already, please do so. It is at

1:20:44.000 --> 1:20:47.800
<v Speaker 2>Friday Golf and we do a ton of stuff. We've

1:20:47.800 --> 1:20:50.760
<v Speaker 2>been we just started this new thing whole of the day,

1:20:50.920 --> 1:20:54.840
<v Speaker 2>which is pretty fun. And Matt's been cooking up some

1:20:54.880 --> 1:20:58.919
<v Speaker 2>really cool reels over there. So follow our social channels

1:20:58.960 --> 1:21:02.080
<v Speaker 2>and thank you to Matt for putting this together. And

1:21:02.800 --> 1:21:05.280
<v Speaker 2>can't wait for Open Championship week. We will be back

1:21:05.320 --> 1:21:08.479
<v Speaker 2>with at least one more podcast this week, maybe another one.

1:21:08.680 --> 1:21:12.479
<v Speaker 2>We'll see, but thanks and we'll talk to you soon.