WEBVTT - Tesla Price Cuts, Verizon Earnings

0:00:02.920 --> 0:00:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. You're listening to the

0:00:10.840 --> 0:00:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live weekdays at ten am

0:00:15.040 --> 0:00:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Eastern on Apple car Playing and broud Otto with the

0:00:17.520 --> 0:00:21.400
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts,

0:00:21.640 --> 0:00:24.480
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:00:25.120 --> 0:00:25.680
<v Speaker 2>More news.

0:00:25.720 --> 0:00:28.200
<v Speaker 3>Manus out of our good friends at Tesla. Tesla cuts

0:00:28.320 --> 0:00:33.720
<v Speaker 3>roughly forty person growth content advertising team, so they're elimiting

0:00:33.800 --> 0:00:36.920
<v Speaker 3>the marketing team is part of those layoffs. That's according

0:00:36.960 --> 0:00:40.760
<v Speaker 3>people familiar with the matter. Here, stock off four percent today,

0:00:40.800 --> 0:00:43.600
<v Speaker 3>fifty two week low down forty three percent a year

0:00:43.640 --> 0:00:45.320
<v Speaker 3>to date. Let's check in with Steve Man. He's a

0:00:45.360 --> 0:00:48.199
<v Speaker 3>global autos analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence. He joins us from

0:00:48.200 --> 0:00:51.519
<v Speaker 3>the Princeton campus and I mean campus down there. It

0:00:51.600 --> 0:00:53.239
<v Speaker 3>is beautiful down there in Princeton. That's kind of where

0:00:53.240 --> 0:00:55.960
<v Speaker 3>we got a lot of the Bloomberg Intelligence folks housed

0:00:56.080 --> 0:00:59.160
<v Speaker 3>down there. Steve, this is brutal here. Let's start with

0:00:59.200 --> 0:01:02.760
<v Speaker 3>something basic, which is really the fundamental issue here, which

0:01:02.800 --> 0:01:07.800
<v Speaker 3>is pricing. I believed mister Musk cut prices. Again, if

0:01:07.840 --> 0:01:09.119
<v Speaker 3>he wakes up on the wrong side of the bed,

0:01:09.160 --> 0:01:11.639
<v Speaker 3>does he cut prices? What's going on with the pricing

0:01:11.640 --> 0:01:12.520
<v Speaker 3>and Testa these days.

0:01:13.440 --> 0:01:15.920
<v Speaker 4>There's a lot of things going on at Tesla right now.

0:01:15.959 --> 0:01:21.360
<v Speaker 4>Bruto is probably not it's that's mildly calling it. You know,

0:01:21.520 --> 0:01:24.200
<v Speaker 4>we always thought that they will have to reverse prices.

0:01:25.120 --> 0:01:27.520
<v Speaker 4>We're not sure why. You know, early in the year

0:01:27.600 --> 0:01:31.920
<v Speaker 4>they increase prices. But you know, price prices have been

0:01:31.959 --> 0:01:35.080
<v Speaker 4>dropped in the US, prices over the weekend, it's been

0:01:35.160 --> 0:01:39.240
<v Speaker 4>dropped in China. China is a different quite different market.

0:01:39.440 --> 0:01:45.480
<v Speaker 4>It's hyper competitive. Everybody's cutting prices, especially by d early

0:01:45.520 --> 0:01:48.240
<v Speaker 4>in the year and late last year. So we're not

0:01:48.320 --> 0:01:51.040
<v Speaker 4>surprised going to cut prices. The question is, you know,

0:01:51.080 --> 0:01:53.440
<v Speaker 4>where are the earnings going to be? And there's gonna

0:01:53.440 --> 0:01:55.560
<v Speaker 4>be a lot of questions that Elon must has to

0:01:55.600 --> 0:01:58.400
<v Speaker 4>answer tomorrow at their earnings call.

0:02:02.080 --> 0:02:04.080
<v Speaker 5>Yep uh. Web Bush Securities were with me a couple

0:02:04.120 --> 0:02:05.640
<v Speaker 5>of weeks ago and they said, it's a hurricane five

0:02:05.640 --> 0:02:08.799
<v Speaker 5>storm coming towards him. That's gone from a Cinderella story

0:02:08.840 --> 0:02:12.200
<v Speaker 5>to that. But who if you look at BYD, if

0:02:12.200 --> 0:02:16.079
<v Speaker 5>you look at Lee, and you look at Tesla, they're

0:02:16.120 --> 0:02:19.560
<v Speaker 5>all cutting prices. So is is is this the bottom

0:02:19.639 --> 0:02:22.680
<v Speaker 5>of that cycle? Has Tesla got the capacity to weather

0:02:22.960 --> 0:02:25.040
<v Speaker 5>a price cutting storm in China.

0:02:26.080 --> 0:02:28.560
<v Speaker 4>That's a good question. I don't think it's the end

0:02:28.600 --> 0:02:34.000
<v Speaker 4>of it. We're actually seeing second quarter sales to be uh,

0:02:34.040 --> 0:02:36.160
<v Speaker 4>you know, uh probably the same as what we saw

0:02:36.160 --> 0:02:40.000
<v Speaker 4>in the first quarter. And remember our first quarter Tesla

0:02:40.080 --> 0:02:43.959
<v Speaker 4>actually in the industry itself actually show uh slower growth

0:02:44.000 --> 0:02:48.200
<v Speaker 4>and even some declinentes uh for certain automakers like Tesla.

0:02:48.440 --> 0:02:51.320
<v Speaker 4>So uh, you know, second quarter is not gonna be

0:02:51.560 --> 0:02:55.960
<v Speaker 4>pretty as well. And I think Tesla, you know, fortunately

0:02:56.040 --> 0:02:58.360
<v Speaker 4>for them, they are pr They are still the only

0:02:58.440 --> 0:03:02.840
<v Speaker 4>profitable EV maker in the industry right now. You know,

0:03:02.960 --> 0:03:06.679
<v Speaker 4>they have about seventeen percent gross margin compared to four

0:03:06.800 --> 0:03:09.840
<v Speaker 4>in GM. They're at you know, single high single digit,

0:03:10.440 --> 0:03:12.680
<v Speaker 4>so you know, they do have some room to give.

0:03:13.040 --> 0:03:15.480
<v Speaker 4>And you know, I think part of it is really

0:03:15.960 --> 0:03:19.000
<v Speaker 4>they're they're really hoping, Tesla is really hoping to drive

0:03:19.080 --> 0:03:22.400
<v Speaker 4>more volume, generate more cash. And you know, one of

0:03:22.480 --> 0:03:24.799
<v Speaker 4>the things that they want to get to sooner than

0:03:24.880 --> 0:03:28.640
<v Speaker 4>rather than later is really to you know, monetize that

0:03:28.800 --> 0:03:32.520
<v Speaker 4>robo taxi. All the investment they've made in AI and

0:03:32.680 --> 0:03:33.880
<v Speaker 4>autonomous vehicles.

0:03:34.480 --> 0:03:37.640
<v Speaker 3>Gross margin is seventy percent, is that just on the

0:03:37.800 --> 0:03:42.080
<v Speaker 3>manufact on the manufacturing side, or is that with the

0:03:42.120 --> 0:03:44.440
<v Speaker 3>credits and so on and so forth, Because my question is,

0:03:44.520 --> 0:03:46.400
<v Speaker 3>you know, if they start cutting prices, are they going

0:03:46.440 --> 0:03:48.080
<v Speaker 3>to sacrifice unit profitability?

0:03:49.200 --> 0:03:53.360
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, the seventeen percent thinking autumn, Yeah, seventeen is on

0:03:53.400 --> 0:03:58.560
<v Speaker 4>the automotive side. Look, they you know, we're hoping they

0:03:58.600 --> 0:04:02.400
<v Speaker 4>don't cut more prices because seventeen percent is not as

0:04:02.440 --> 0:04:06.560
<v Speaker 4>good as the mid twenty percent they were getting last

0:04:06.600 --> 0:04:10.040
<v Speaker 4>year and the year before. And cutting prices is not

0:04:10.280 --> 0:04:13.960
<v Speaker 4>the not the solution. You know, the industry does not

0:04:14.200 --> 0:04:17.080
<v Speaker 4>need to be in that spiral of cutting tit for

0:04:17.160 --> 0:04:20.919
<v Speaker 4>tat price cuts. It's gonna hurt everyone, and at the

0:04:20.920 --> 0:04:24.760
<v Speaker 4>same time, it's gonna hurt you know, the GMS and

0:04:24.839 --> 0:04:29.040
<v Speaker 4>four because it doesn't really make it, you know, feasible

0:04:29.160 --> 0:04:31.440
<v Speaker 4>even for them to roll out a cheaper model down

0:04:31.480 --> 0:04:34.120
<v Speaker 4>the road. So, you know, what we're trying to do

0:04:34.320 --> 0:04:37.560
<v Speaker 4>is create greater adoption in the EV market, in the

0:04:37.600 --> 0:04:41.880
<v Speaker 4>EV industry for every consumer, and cutting prices is gonna

0:04:42.080 --> 0:04:44.400
<v Speaker 4>you know, weed out a lot of the competition that

0:04:44.440 --> 0:04:49.039
<v Speaker 4>are actually trying to introduce a more affordable model for

0:04:49.080 --> 0:04:51.960
<v Speaker 4>the for the market, for the greater market Steve, I mean.

0:04:51.839 --> 0:04:56.719
<v Speaker 5>We can debate adaptability in China in the United States

0:04:56.720 --> 0:05:00.400
<v Speaker 5>of America forever. I mean the infrastructure is one could

0:05:00.400 --> 0:05:03.240
<v Speaker 5>coin phrase probably not there again, going back to a

0:05:03.279 --> 0:05:05.480
<v Speaker 5>web Bush note delivered in my inbox this morning by

0:05:05.600 --> 0:05:08.320
<v Speaker 5>Dan Ives, which is it comes down to delivering a

0:05:08.360 --> 0:05:11.320
<v Speaker 5>model TO in the next twelve to eighteen months to

0:05:11.400 --> 0:05:14.599
<v Speaker 5>deliver a second wave of growth. If they don't deliver

0:05:14.720 --> 0:05:17.359
<v Speaker 5>a new model TO, that growth will not come and

0:05:17.480 --> 0:05:21.280
<v Speaker 5>robotaxis would be a tragic gamble in our opinion, as

0:05:21.320 --> 0:05:24.359
<v Speaker 5>full autonomy we do not see until twenty thirty. This

0:05:24.440 --> 0:05:27.080
<v Speaker 5>comes down to innovation in model two at the base,

0:05:27.160 --> 0:05:27.560
<v Speaker 5>doesn't it.

0:05:28.440 --> 0:05:32.839
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Model two is important. I think what the industry

0:05:32.880 --> 0:05:35.440
<v Speaker 4>is looking for and what investors are looking for is

0:05:35.560 --> 0:05:40.440
<v Speaker 4>looking They're looking for more affordable models for consumers so

0:05:40.480 --> 0:05:44.440
<v Speaker 4>that the penetration rates, so the addressable market for EV. Actually,

0:05:45.120 --> 0:05:48.279
<v Speaker 4>it's going to be greater than what it is today now.

0:05:48.680 --> 0:05:53.239
<v Speaker 4>Like I said earlier, Tesla it has been aggressive, probably

0:05:53.240 --> 0:05:57.960
<v Speaker 4>the most aggressive and cunning EV prices, and they've redesigned

0:05:57.960 --> 0:06:00.960
<v Speaker 4>a vehicle that they can manufacturing at a lower cost

0:06:01.000 --> 0:06:03.120
<v Speaker 4>than you know, than it is today.

0:06:03.640 --> 0:06:04.920
<v Speaker 2>So you know, they.

0:06:04.800 --> 0:06:08.080
<v Speaker 4>Could launch a model to the other option. You know,

0:06:08.120 --> 0:06:10.360
<v Speaker 4>I don't think the market has really talked about is

0:06:10.920 --> 0:06:14.880
<v Speaker 4>you know, the price cutting will allow them potential, the

0:06:14.920 --> 0:06:18.320
<v Speaker 4>cost cutting will probably allow him the cut prices even further.

0:06:18.680 --> 0:06:21.279
<v Speaker 4>You know, it wouldn't be a surprise down the road

0:06:21.320 --> 0:06:25.080
<v Speaker 4>that they're going to offer the model three below thirty thousand,

0:06:25.360 --> 0:06:28.080
<v Speaker 4>you know, if they can manage that costs wisely.

0:06:28.640 --> 0:06:32.360
<v Speaker 3>Hey, Steve, After the close tomorrow, Tesla will report numbers.

0:06:32.360 --> 0:06:34.720
<v Speaker 3>They have a conference called five thirty pm Wall Street Time.

0:06:34.920 --> 0:06:38.800
<v Speaker 3>What does Elon Musk need? What message does he need

0:06:38.839 --> 0:06:41.200
<v Speaker 3>to get across to kind of you know, shore up

0:06:41.200 --> 0:06:42.000
<v Speaker 3>this stock price.

0:06:41.839 --> 0:06:45.520
<v Speaker 4>Here well as you know, the stock price is you know,

0:06:45.920 --> 0:06:51.480
<v Speaker 4>mostly driven by the anticipation of robotaxi, of autonomous vehicle

0:06:51.520 --> 0:06:54.680
<v Speaker 4>of AI. I think what he needs really needs to

0:06:54.720 --> 0:06:58.120
<v Speaker 4>come out and tell people, give certain milestones for the

0:06:58.160 --> 0:07:02.200
<v Speaker 4>investors to follow. Understand, you know, how he's taking that

0:07:02.320 --> 0:07:07.760
<v Speaker 4>company forward into you know, into the next decade, how

0:07:07.800 --> 0:07:10.320
<v Speaker 4>his robotaxi is going to generate the revenue and the

0:07:10.320 --> 0:07:15.480
<v Speaker 4>profit that he's so much been advocating for. So, you know,

0:07:15.800 --> 0:07:18.920
<v Speaker 4>automotive business. We all know it's it's it's a small

0:07:18.960 --> 0:07:22.840
<v Speaker 4>part it's in terms of valuation, but they you know,

0:07:22.880 --> 0:07:24.960
<v Speaker 4>I think Elon Musk and the company really needs to

0:07:25.000 --> 0:07:28.320
<v Speaker 4>come out to make the investor feel comfortable that he

0:07:28.400 --> 0:07:31.000
<v Speaker 4>is still on track and there is a light at

0:07:31.040 --> 0:07:33.280
<v Speaker 4>the end of the tunnel sooner rather than later.

0:07:34.240 --> 0:07:38.920
<v Speaker 3>Is there a sense that he's focused enough on this

0:07:39.000 --> 0:07:41.560
<v Speaker 3>company here? Is there still that concern that he spread

0:07:41.680 --> 0:07:42.040
<v Speaker 3>too thin?

0:07:42.120 --> 0:07:42.560
<v Speaker 2>Do you think?

0:07:44.680 --> 0:07:47.480
<v Speaker 4>I don't think so. I think, you know, he's He's

0:07:47.520 --> 0:07:51.080
<v Speaker 4>one person. I mean, he's done a lot with SpaceX uh,

0:07:51.280 --> 0:07:54.400
<v Speaker 4>he's done a lot with Tesla obviously, and I think

0:07:54.440 --> 0:07:57.840
<v Speaker 4>he's even though there's been some departure, I think still

0:07:57.880 --> 0:08:01.120
<v Speaker 4>I think he still has a very very strong behind him.

0:08:01.360 --> 0:08:03.760
<v Speaker 4>He's still hiring a lot for the AI for the

0:08:03.920 --> 0:08:08.120
<v Speaker 4>town of his vehicle business. So I'm not too concern

0:08:08.200 --> 0:08:11.760
<v Speaker 4>at the moment. I think communication is key for the

0:08:11.840 --> 0:08:15.680
<v Speaker 4>company in the next you know, tomorrow, in the next

0:08:15.720 --> 0:08:19.160
<v Speaker 4>few weeks yep, and through August eighth, when he actually

0:08:19.200 --> 0:08:22.400
<v Speaker 4>reveals his ROBOTAXI.

0:08:21.800 --> 0:08:23.400
<v Speaker 3>Oh, okay, all right, Well I'm going to listen to

0:08:23.400 --> 0:08:26.320
<v Speaker 3>this call tomorrow, so that'll be interesting. I think I

0:08:26.320 --> 0:08:27.640
<v Speaker 3>think a lot of people are going to pay attention

0:08:27.640 --> 0:08:29.320
<v Speaker 3>to that call. Steve, thanks so much for joining us.

0:08:29.440 --> 0:08:32.360
<v Speaker 3>Steve Man Global Global Autos and Industrials research Channels for

0:08:32.360 --> 0:08:36.800
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Intelligence, joining USROM Princeton, New Jersey via zoom.

0:08:36.559 --> 0:08:38.440
<v Speaker 2>And here it's you know, it's Dan Iives of.

0:08:38.440 --> 0:08:42.040
<v Speaker 3>Webbush said, this is a critical, critical, maybe the most

0:08:42.040 --> 0:08:45.760
<v Speaker 3>important conference call for Elon Musk here because there.

0:08:45.720 --> 0:08:47.920
<v Speaker 2>Is a whole host of headwinds for this company.

0:08:47.960 --> 0:08:49.280
<v Speaker 5>It's about reinstilling confidence.

0:08:49.320 --> 0:08:52.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's confidence in genius. I never said the genius

0:08:52.120 --> 0:08:54.880
<v Speaker 2>had left right. No, exactly right. So we'll see that

0:08:54.920 --> 0:08:55.559
<v Speaker 2>Tesla again.

0:08:55.880 --> 0:09:00.640
<v Speaker 3>Fifty two week low here today off about forty five percent,

0:09:00.880 --> 0:09:04.400
<v Speaker 3>just a year to date, significant loss of value.

0:09:04.440 --> 0:09:09.720
<v Speaker 1>There. You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us

0:09:09.760 --> 0:09:13.160
<v Speaker 1>live weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecar Play and

0:09:13.160 --> 0:09:16.080
<v Speaker 1>Android Otto with the Bloomberg Business Act. You can also

0:09:16.160 --> 0:09:19.319
<v Speaker 1>listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York

0:09:19.400 --> 0:09:24.560
<v Speaker 1>station Just Say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:09:24.360 --> 0:09:28.360
<v Speaker 3>The Right Smack in the Middle Earning season Menace Verizon Communications.

0:09:28.679 --> 0:09:30.439
<v Speaker 3>I'm a customer of Horizon Wireless.

0:09:30.720 --> 0:09:32.080
<v Speaker 2>You know I think I am as well. Yes, I

0:09:32.080 --> 0:09:33.040
<v Speaker 2>am the riison.

0:09:33.280 --> 0:09:36.480
<v Speaker 3>I've gotten, I've cut my kids off just about everywhere. Financially,

0:09:36.520 --> 0:09:39.600
<v Speaker 3>they're pretty much on their own. With one glaring exception

0:09:40.800 --> 0:09:43.320
<v Speaker 3>the Celluar telephone bill. They're all still on this whole

0:09:43.320 --> 0:09:46.560
<v Speaker 3>family plan. I'm carrying all of them, so I haven't

0:09:46.559 --> 0:09:47.680
<v Speaker 3>figured out how to get rid of them.

0:09:47.760 --> 0:09:49.199
<v Speaker 2>Maybe that helped with the Verizon's earnings.

0:09:49.240 --> 0:09:49.360
<v Speaker 5>Here.

0:09:49.400 --> 0:09:51.760
<v Speaker 3>John Butler joins us. He covers all things telecom for

0:09:51.840 --> 0:09:55.120
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Intelligence. He's here in the Bloomberg Interactive Broker studio.

0:09:55.600 --> 0:09:57.840
<v Speaker 3>He doesn't mail it in like some of his managers do.

0:09:57.920 --> 0:09:59.960
<v Speaker 3>He comes into the New York office, which we appreciate.

0:10:00.720 --> 0:10:03.080
<v Speaker 2>John. What'd you see from Verizon this quarter?

0:10:03.440 --> 0:10:08.559
<v Speaker 6>So, Paul, I thought, overall, a very solid quarter from Verizon.

0:10:08.720 --> 0:10:12.200
<v Speaker 6>I mean, one thing that I always look at is pricing,

0:10:12.440 --> 0:10:15.360
<v Speaker 6>right because when they raise prices, which they did on

0:10:15.440 --> 0:10:18.760
<v Speaker 6>me and you, by the way, it extends across the

0:10:18.800 --> 0:10:22.640
<v Speaker 6>whole base, their base of one hundred million plus subscribers.

0:10:23.280 --> 0:10:28.280
<v Speaker 6>So pricing was up strongly in the quarter, and I thought, overall,

0:10:28.320 --> 0:10:32.040
<v Speaker 6>a solid quarter. I mean, it's interesting because the telecoms

0:10:32.080 --> 0:10:34.840
<v Speaker 6>throw all these metrics at you, and you can always

0:10:34.840 --> 0:10:37.559
<v Speaker 6>point to one or two and say they were weak.

0:10:37.600 --> 0:10:40.520
<v Speaker 6>Here they were strong there, you know, and it all

0:10:40.559 --> 0:10:42.800
<v Speaker 6>comes out in the wash. In my opinion, I sort

0:10:42.840 --> 0:10:46.520
<v Speaker 6>of look, I take that ten thousand foot view and

0:10:46.600 --> 0:10:50.640
<v Speaker 6>I say, how is pricing and how were subscriber net ads?

0:10:50.679 --> 0:10:54.680
<v Speaker 6>How many netnews subscribers did they add? And there's still

0:10:54.720 --> 0:10:57.760
<v Speaker 6>a shared donor. They're still losing a bit of subscribers

0:10:57.840 --> 0:10:58.440
<v Speaker 6>on the margin.

0:10:58.480 --> 0:11:00.720
<v Speaker 2>At every quarter they're getting better and better.

0:11:00.880 --> 0:11:04.520
<v Speaker 6>So on balance, I thought a decent quarter in terms

0:11:04.600 --> 0:11:05.880
<v Speaker 6>of the trends, and.

0:11:06.880 --> 0:11:08.800
<v Speaker 2>You know, I like where they're headed for the year.

0:11:09.000 --> 0:11:10.719
<v Speaker 5>I remember when we used to try to get used

0:11:10.720 --> 0:11:13.480
<v Speaker 5>to acronyms when we were covering Vodafone and different things

0:11:13.480 --> 0:11:15.680
<v Speaker 5>in Europe. You know, you've got your average revenue per user,

0:11:15.720 --> 0:11:17.719
<v Speaker 5>but you look at the you just switch on your

0:11:17.720 --> 0:11:21.440
<v Speaker 5>television at home, and you got Apple, You've got Netflix,

0:11:21.559 --> 0:11:25.560
<v Speaker 5>you've got Prime, and you've got you just consuming so

0:11:25.800 --> 0:11:29.320
<v Speaker 5>much more at so much more faster speed. So where

0:11:29.320 --> 0:11:32.480
<v Speaker 5>are they in terms of pricing differential for that additional

0:11:32.520 --> 0:11:34.800
<v Speaker 5>bandwidth that I'm I'm going to use more of. It's

0:11:34.840 --> 0:11:38.120
<v Speaker 5>just a natural evolution of gorging on data.

0:11:38.800 --> 0:11:42.040
<v Speaker 6>Well, I'm glad you asked that, manus, because what Verizon

0:11:42.280 --> 0:11:44.800
<v Speaker 6>is doing so well is They've come out with a

0:11:44.880 --> 0:11:49.280
<v Speaker 6>new family of unlimited plans called My Plan, and it

0:11:49.320 --> 0:11:52.640
<v Speaker 6>allows people to not only buy wireless service, but also

0:11:52.800 --> 0:11:55.320
<v Speaker 6>so the streaming services at.

0:11:55.200 --> 0:11:56.160
<v Speaker 2>A pretty good deal.

0:11:56.600 --> 0:11:59.760
<v Speaker 6>Finally, there's a bundle, right, there is a bundle praise,

0:12:00.240 --> 0:12:02.959
<v Speaker 6>and you get to control the bundles, so they don't

0:12:03.040 --> 0:12:06.240
<v Speaker 6>set preset bundles and say you can get planned a

0:12:06.440 --> 0:12:09.280
<v Speaker 6>B or C. You can sort of mix and match

0:12:09.360 --> 0:12:12.080
<v Speaker 6>and say I want wireless service and I want Disney

0:12:12.120 --> 0:12:15.520
<v Speaker 6>but not Hulu, so you can sort of customize the

0:12:15.559 --> 0:12:20.359
<v Speaker 6>plan yourself. Ergo the name my Plan, and it's resonating

0:12:20.480 --> 0:12:24.160
<v Speaker 6>really well, Like I'm really surprised after about a year

0:12:24.240 --> 0:12:26.640
<v Speaker 6>they've got a quarter of the base on My Plan.

0:12:27.320 --> 0:12:30.920
<v Speaker 6>It's very good for them because they're highly profitable plans,

0:12:31.000 --> 0:12:33.080
<v Speaker 6>and by year end they hope to have half the

0:12:33.160 --> 0:12:36.720
<v Speaker 6>base on that My Plan structure, which is big.

0:12:37.040 --> 0:12:38.920
<v Speaker 3>You know, I'm looking at the stock here about two

0:12:38.960 --> 0:12:41.280
<v Speaker 3>and a half percent today, but up about five percent

0:12:41.320 --> 0:12:41.840
<v Speaker 3>year to date.

0:12:42.320 --> 0:12:45.240
<v Speaker 2>This seems got a six and a half percent dividend yield.

0:12:45.320 --> 0:12:46.600
<v Speaker 2>That's what I'm talking about.

0:12:47.120 --> 0:12:48.520
<v Speaker 3>So I don't know why you can't talk to your

0:12:48.520 --> 0:12:51.360
<v Speaker 3>good I saw Tim Cook that Duke recently and I said,

0:12:51.360 --> 0:12:52.880
<v Speaker 3>can you raise your dividend.

0:12:52.559 --> 0:12:54.640
<v Speaker 2>A little bit? And he gave me the heisman. But

0:12:56.280 --> 0:12:59.280
<v Speaker 2>six percent dividend, seven percent divin in yield? Yeah, is

0:12:59.280 --> 0:13:00.559
<v Speaker 2>that sustainable for these guys?

0:13:01.280 --> 0:13:04.280
<v Speaker 6>You know, I think most telecoms know the danger of

0:13:04.360 --> 0:13:06.920
<v Speaker 6>cutting a dividends. So let's put it that way. But

0:13:07.040 --> 0:13:10.000
<v Speaker 6>if you look at Verizon stock you touched on it,

0:13:10.000 --> 0:13:11.800
<v Speaker 6>it's had a bit of a run here, and so

0:13:11.960 --> 0:13:16.760
<v Speaker 6>is that stock price goes up? Obviously the yield goes down.

0:13:18.000 --> 0:13:21.959
<v Speaker 6>But you know they're very focused on shareholder returns as

0:13:22.040 --> 0:13:24.880
<v Speaker 6>they mature here AT and T is the same way,

0:13:24.960 --> 0:13:28.960
<v Speaker 6>so is T Mobile, and so in terms of the divinend,

0:13:29.040 --> 0:13:30.839
<v Speaker 6>I think it's very safer right now.

0:13:30.960 --> 0:13:33.079
<v Speaker 5>You see, you use the web maturity and that brings

0:13:33.400 --> 0:13:35.400
<v Speaker 5>that brings a lot of connotations, and one of them

0:13:35.480 --> 0:13:37.920
<v Speaker 5>is M and A. You remember the most fabled disaster

0:13:38.480 --> 0:13:41.480
<v Speaker 5>telecoms murder of all time at and what was it?

0:13:41.600 --> 0:13:44.800
<v Speaker 5>Aol Time Warner. But when you use the word maturity.

0:13:44.440 --> 0:13:49.000
<v Speaker 2>Got paid on that, thank you? Yeah, we got paid Yeah, good.

0:13:48.800 --> 0:13:52.480
<v Speaker 5>For you represent everything, We represent what you know what.

0:13:52.640 --> 0:13:56.120
<v Speaker 5>But there's the question is is the next iteration in

0:13:56.160 --> 0:13:57.760
<v Speaker 5>this market some form of M.

0:13:57.720 --> 0:13:58.800
<v Speaker 2>And A or is it innovation?

0:13:59.440 --> 0:14:02.480
<v Speaker 6>So they got asked that in the call, and I

0:14:02.520 --> 0:14:04.920
<v Speaker 6>thought the answer was very good, which is, we have

0:14:05.000 --> 0:14:08.080
<v Speaker 6>the assets in place right now to execute on the

0:14:08.120 --> 0:14:11.199
<v Speaker 6>growth plan that we see for the next few years.

0:14:12.360 --> 0:14:15.080
<v Speaker 6>And I think that's right. But they also have the

0:14:15.160 --> 0:14:18.760
<v Speaker 6>ability if they want to make either tuck in acquisitions.

0:14:19.440 --> 0:14:22.800
<v Speaker 2>He wants disitions.

0:14:22.920 --> 0:14:26.800
<v Speaker 6>I think I think they know that investors want that dividend.

0:14:26.920 --> 0:14:30.760
<v Speaker 6>So in terms of any grand ambition, ambitious M and

0:14:30.840 --> 0:14:33.480
<v Speaker 6>A like we saw with AT and T in Time Warner,

0:14:34.120 --> 0:14:35.800
<v Speaker 6>I'm not saying it with Verizon.

0:14:36.400 --> 0:14:38.960
<v Speaker 2>What's the competitive landscape these days? Is it just price, price,

0:14:39.040 --> 0:14:39.640
<v Speaker 2>price price.

0:14:41.360 --> 0:14:43.600
<v Speaker 6>It is very tough at the low end, it's all

0:14:43.640 --> 0:14:47.520
<v Speaker 6>about price. At the higher end, which is where Verizon plays, it's.

0:14:47.280 --> 0:14:48.400
<v Speaker 2>All about value.

0:14:48.960 --> 0:14:52.160
<v Speaker 6>What kind of value are you offering with that package?

0:14:52.720 --> 0:14:56.760
<v Speaker 6>And I think we were talking about verizons my plan,

0:14:56.840 --> 0:15:00.280
<v Speaker 6>the mix and match that has high value, and I

0:15:00.480 --> 0:15:04.640
<v Speaker 6>think I think it's resonating well with the subscriber base.

0:15:05.200 --> 0:15:07.640
<v Speaker 3>All right, very good, John Butler. He has our go

0:15:07.720 --> 0:15:10.840
<v Speaker 3>to guy and all things telecom. Verizon putting out some

0:15:11.160 --> 0:15:13.960
<v Speaker 3>numbers here, decent number stock off a couple of percent. Today,

0:15:14.040 --> 0:15:16.640
<v Speaker 3>John Butler covers telecom for Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:15:16.960 --> 0:15:18.880
<v Speaker 2>We appreciate getting some of his time.

0:15:21.120 --> 0:15:25.000
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:15:25.080 --> 0:15:28.160
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Affle Card, playing Android

0:15:28.200 --> 0:15:31.280
<v Speaker 1>outo with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand wherever

0:15:31.360 --> 0:15:35.200
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:15:36.080 --> 0:15:38.160
<v Speaker 3>So my tech m and A bankers are not happy

0:15:38.200 --> 0:15:43.640
<v Speaker 3>because it apparently Salesforce takeover talks with Informatica are cooling off,

0:15:43.880 --> 0:15:45.640
<v Speaker 3>and that might have been a nice mm A trade

0:15:45.680 --> 0:15:47.480
<v Speaker 3>in the tech space. Let's break it down a little

0:15:47.480 --> 0:15:49.960
<v Speaker 3>bit here on a rag ran a senior technology analyst.

0:15:50.000 --> 0:15:52.640
<v Speaker 2>You know him. He's out in Chicago. This guy I.

0:15:52.680 --> 0:15:56.200
<v Speaker 3>Don't know Sunil rog Gopaul, senior software analyst. But the

0:15:56.200 --> 0:15:58.880
<v Speaker 3>goodness is he's in our Bloomberg Interactive Broker studio. He

0:15:58.880 --> 0:16:01.720
<v Speaker 3>doesn't mail it in from Chicago like an rock Ron.

0:16:01.720 --> 0:16:04.280
<v Speaker 3>It does, Honor Rock. I didn't hire this guy, Roger

0:16:04.360 --> 0:16:05.280
<v Speaker 3>Capal did. I.

0:16:05.280 --> 0:16:06.240
<v Speaker 2>I don't know him.

0:16:07.200 --> 0:16:10.440
<v Speaker 7>No, Samiel's awesome and he does all things infrastructure. You'll

0:16:10.480 --> 0:16:11.080
<v Speaker 7>really like him.

0:16:11.120 --> 0:16:13.720
<v Speaker 2>Good stuff. At least he's here in the office. We

0:16:13.760 --> 0:16:15.680
<v Speaker 2>make note of that. All right. So, Anrak, I was

0:16:15.760 --> 0:16:17.080
<v Speaker 2>kind of surprised to see.

0:16:16.880 --> 0:16:19.200
<v Speaker 3>This news to begin with, Like, I didn't think Salesforce

0:16:20.360 --> 0:16:21.600
<v Speaker 3>needed to really buy.

0:16:21.360 --> 0:16:23.480
<v Speaker 2>Anything, So what's going on here do you think?

0:16:24.240 --> 0:16:26.400
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, it was just a big head scratcher for us

0:16:26.440 --> 0:16:30.280
<v Speaker 7>to almost a few days ago because last March, Bennehoff

0:16:30.320 --> 0:16:32.880
<v Speaker 7>comes and says, I've disbandled the MNE committee, no more

0:16:33.120 --> 0:16:35.040
<v Speaker 7>m and A. I'm going to focus on margins and

0:16:35.160 --> 0:16:38.800
<v Speaker 7>organic growth. And in less than a year, you know,

0:16:38.880 --> 0:16:40.640
<v Speaker 7>just around that one year mark, he's like, oh, we've

0:16:40.640 --> 0:16:42.320
<v Speaker 7>got to go back and you know, buy something now.

0:16:42.400 --> 0:16:44.400
<v Speaker 7>He didn't say that, the company didn't say that, but

0:16:44.480 --> 0:16:46.560
<v Speaker 7>that was the rumor on the street that they're looking

0:16:46.560 --> 0:16:48.800
<v Speaker 7>to buy Informatica. For us, that was a bit of

0:16:48.840 --> 0:16:52.280
<v Speaker 7>a surprise because Informatica grows six to seven percent compared

0:16:52.280 --> 0:16:54.520
<v Speaker 7>to Salesforce, which is growing north of ten percent. So

0:16:54.800 --> 0:16:56.440
<v Speaker 7>why would anybody buy something that.

0:16:56.480 --> 0:16:57.600
<v Speaker 2>Is slow growth?

0:16:57.960 --> 0:17:00.200
<v Speaker 7>I get the data angle of it, but you know,

0:17:00.640 --> 0:17:02.840
<v Speaker 7>it was it was not something that we really liked.

0:17:03.160 --> 0:17:05.439
<v Speaker 3>Sunil, first of all, thanks so much for joining us

0:17:05.480 --> 0:17:09.080
<v Speaker 3>here in studio. Sunil Rochkopal, senior software analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence,

0:17:09.960 --> 0:17:12.359
<v Speaker 3>tell us about Informatica, I don't know a lot about it.

0:17:12.400 --> 0:17:14.120
<v Speaker 3>I don't think a lot of investors know a lot

0:17:14.160 --> 0:17:16.600
<v Speaker 3>about it. And that was one of the reasons that

0:17:16.640 --> 0:17:20.120
<v Speaker 3>they're saying, what is Salesforce buying here or maybe thinking

0:17:20.119 --> 0:17:21.840
<v Speaker 3>about buying? What tell us about this company?

0:17:22.119 --> 0:17:27.280
<v Speaker 8>Sure, Informatica is all about data management, which is about

0:17:27.520 --> 0:17:31.360
<v Speaker 8>clean cleaning all the data that comes from different sources

0:17:31.440 --> 0:17:35.600
<v Speaker 8>and aligning it with the applications and getting all things

0:17:35.680 --> 0:17:38.880
<v Speaker 8>sorted out. For data, so data comes in various shapes,

0:17:39.000 --> 0:17:41.560
<v Speaker 8>forms and different sources, so all of that needs to

0:17:41.600 --> 0:17:44.800
<v Speaker 8>be cleaned up to be used in a proper shape.

0:17:44.840 --> 0:17:49.320
<v Speaker 8>So I think Informatica is that layer that acts as

0:17:49.359 --> 0:17:53.720
<v Speaker 8>a cleanser of data and gets you to that right usage.

0:17:54.080 --> 0:17:56.479
<v Speaker 8>So that's where it comes in as a player.

0:17:56.920 --> 0:18:02.000
<v Speaker 3>So with if they're not going to tie up with Salesforce,

0:18:02.720 --> 0:18:04.760
<v Speaker 3>what's the call on this company, what's the call on

0:18:04.800 --> 0:18:05.200
<v Speaker 3>the stock?

0:18:05.920 --> 0:18:08.199
<v Speaker 2>Either you know, bullsh or bears.

0:18:08.640 --> 0:18:12.439
<v Speaker 8>Look strategically for Informatica, such an alliance would have been

0:18:12.480 --> 0:18:16.120
<v Speaker 8>a great move that would have helped fuel its cloud journey,

0:18:16.280 --> 0:18:19.920
<v Speaker 8>and that now accounts for roughly one third of its revenues.

0:18:20.840 --> 0:18:24.880
<v Speaker 8>With the deal not happening. Informatica now has to focus

0:18:24.920 --> 0:18:29.840
<v Speaker 8>on fueling its cloud growth organically. The company is boosting

0:18:29.880 --> 0:18:34.480
<v Speaker 8>its partnership and rolling out new AI powered features, but

0:18:34.600 --> 0:18:40.800
<v Speaker 8>this space is highly fragmented and competitive. The company has

0:18:40.920 --> 0:18:45.199
<v Speaker 8>continued to lose market share, especially with the challengers that

0:18:45.280 --> 0:18:49.719
<v Speaker 8>have risen substantially over the last few years. There are

0:18:49.760 --> 0:18:53.320
<v Speaker 8>other big players like SAP and IBM that also compete,

0:18:53.320 --> 0:18:56.360
<v Speaker 8>So I think going forward the market will definitely look

0:18:56.480 --> 0:18:59.960
<v Speaker 8>a lot more challenging because now Salesforce are not having

0:19:00.119 --> 0:19:02.960
<v Speaker 8>to go through with this tale will put more resources

0:19:03.000 --> 0:19:08.040
<v Speaker 8>into MuleSoft, which I think will raise the competitive intensity

0:19:08.119 --> 0:19:10.679
<v Speaker 8>and I think that is a big challenge for Informatical

0:19:10.760 --> 0:19:11.280
<v Speaker 8>going forward.

0:19:12.440 --> 0:19:16.040
<v Speaker 3>An rag on your side from the Salesforce side, I mean,

0:19:16.359 --> 0:19:17.520
<v Speaker 3>is it just steady as she goes?

0:19:17.640 --> 0:19:19.200
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's just such a great company.

0:19:19.640 --> 0:19:22.439
<v Speaker 3>What's the call for the next twelve to eighteen months

0:19:22.480 --> 0:19:24.960
<v Speaker 3>for Salesforce dot com?

0:19:25.359 --> 0:19:27.720
<v Speaker 7>So, Paul, what we're thinking. You know, hopefully by the

0:19:27.800 --> 0:19:29.680
<v Speaker 7>end of this year we get a little more clarity

0:19:29.720 --> 0:19:33.040
<v Speaker 7>on technology spending and perhaps from next year onwards we

0:19:33.080 --> 0:19:35.840
<v Speaker 7>can see that, you know, load double digit growth in

0:19:35.920 --> 0:19:39.480
<v Speaker 7>earnings as well as I take that back load. Double

0:19:39.480 --> 0:19:43.520
<v Speaker 7>digit growth in sales coupled with some margin expansion getting

0:19:43.520 --> 0:19:46.600
<v Speaker 7>you to that mid to high teens earnings growth. That's

0:19:46.600 --> 0:19:51.040
<v Speaker 7>what we want from salesforce, organic growth, organic earnings, not

0:19:51.160 --> 0:19:53.560
<v Speaker 7>so much driven by M and A. And I'm hoping

0:19:53.600 --> 0:19:55.600
<v Speaker 7>that that's what the company delivers.

0:19:56.640 --> 0:19:59.560
<v Speaker 3>On the software side, what are the most exciting areas

0:19:59.760 --> 0:20:00.080
<v Speaker 3>for you?

0:20:00.080 --> 0:20:01.720
<v Speaker 2>You that you're looking at here.

0:20:02.080 --> 0:20:07.439
<v Speaker 8>Look for me in the overall enterprise software space, I

0:20:07.640 --> 0:20:15.480
<v Speaker 8>still like names in the observability sector. The Yeah, all right,

0:20:15.720 --> 0:20:19.840
<v Speaker 8>So the observability is they act as a layer that

0:20:20.000 --> 0:20:25.000
<v Speaker 8>monitors all of your systems applications, so be it any

0:20:25.119 --> 0:20:28.520
<v Speaker 8>kind of an application that you're running your enterprise, everything

0:20:28.600 --> 0:20:31.560
<v Speaker 8>needs to be monitored if there are like any bugs,

0:20:31.600 --> 0:20:35.200
<v Speaker 8>if there are like system downtimes, et cetera. So observability

0:20:35.440 --> 0:20:40.639
<v Speaker 8>vendors typically monitor all your applications and the infrastructure. So

0:20:40.720 --> 0:20:43.719
<v Speaker 8>they play a very critical role in the overall enterprise

0:20:43.800 --> 0:20:47.000
<v Speaker 8>software space. And I think players such as the data

0:20:47.040 --> 0:20:49.639
<v Speaker 8>Dog diner trays are very well positioned in.

0:20:49.640 --> 0:20:51.640
<v Speaker 2>Public recently, like recently as a couple of years.

0:20:51.720 --> 0:20:52.680
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, yes, that's right.

0:20:53.080 --> 0:20:55.000
<v Speaker 2>So so what is I mean? I love the name.

0:20:55.760 --> 0:20:57.520
<v Speaker 3>I'm looking at the stock here and bringing up the

0:20:57.520 --> 0:20:58.760
<v Speaker 3>stock Data Dog.

0:20:59.520 --> 0:21:04.120
<v Speaker 2>The DG this is kind of forty billion dollar market cap.

0:21:04.119 --> 0:21:06.439
<v Speaker 3>It's kind of flat stock price on the year, but

0:21:06.520 --> 0:21:08.720
<v Speaker 3>up to seventy five percent over the trailing twelve months.

0:21:09.119 --> 0:21:10.480
<v Speaker 2>What's the call on Data Dog here?

0:21:11.400 --> 0:21:15.400
<v Speaker 8>Look, it's a very I would say it has been

0:21:15.440 --> 0:21:18.399
<v Speaker 8>a fast growing company. And of course last year we

0:21:19.320 --> 0:21:22.520
<v Speaker 8>have seen a slow down in the overall enterprise software space,

0:21:22.560 --> 0:21:25.000
<v Speaker 8>and the Data Dog of course has been impacted with

0:21:25.080 --> 0:21:28.840
<v Speaker 8>that slow it spending trends. But overall, if you look

0:21:28.880 --> 0:21:33.119
<v Speaker 8>at the observability space as we see, I think that

0:21:33.280 --> 0:21:36.159
<v Speaker 8>is a space that will continue to grow because the

0:21:36.240 --> 0:21:40.680
<v Speaker 8>number of applications and the infrastructure that enterprises are deploying,

0:21:40.800 --> 0:21:43.760
<v Speaker 8>especially with what is supposed to come with Jenny AI

0:21:43.840 --> 0:21:46.760
<v Speaker 8>and others, we will continue to see a massive rise

0:21:46.760 --> 0:21:49.720
<v Speaker 8>in the infrastructure and applications and that should all bode

0:21:49.720 --> 0:21:52.800
<v Speaker 8>well for Data Dog and the players such as a Diner,

0:21:52.840 --> 0:21:54.600
<v Speaker 8>Trace and others in the observatory space.

0:21:55.240 --> 0:21:59.000
<v Speaker 3>An rob We've getting earnings coming up for the tech names.

0:21:59.000 --> 0:22:00.720
<v Speaker 2>What are you looking for here?

0:22:01.280 --> 0:22:03.160
<v Speaker 3>Should we be just kind of saying count how many

0:22:03.160 --> 0:22:05.560
<v Speaker 3>times they mentioned AI and the conference call?

0:22:06.440 --> 0:22:07.959
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, a little bit of that I think it's going

0:22:08.040 --> 0:22:10.320
<v Speaker 7>to be a steady growth rate. But I'm getting a

0:22:10.320 --> 0:22:12.720
<v Speaker 7>little concerned about the guidance because I think the macro

0:22:12.840 --> 0:22:16.000
<v Speaker 7>environment is getting a little bit diceee, not sure what's

0:22:16.000 --> 0:22:17.760
<v Speaker 7>going to happen in the Middle East. So I'll be

0:22:17.880 --> 0:22:20.720
<v Speaker 7>very surprised if any company comes up with a bullish guidance,

0:22:21.040 --> 0:22:23.199
<v Speaker 7>but I think, you know, one should be prepared for

0:22:23.280 --> 0:22:25.240
<v Speaker 7>it because we have seen some of these names go

0:22:25.359 --> 0:22:28.040
<v Speaker 7>up pretty strong over the last twelve months, so they

0:22:28.040 --> 0:22:30.440
<v Speaker 7>could be a period of consolidation for the next quarter

0:22:30.560 --> 0:22:30.840
<v Speaker 7>or two.

0:22:31.560 --> 0:22:31.760
<v Speaker 8>You know.

0:22:31.800 --> 0:22:34.960
<v Speaker 7>Our big call is that we do see tech spending recovery,

0:22:35.359 --> 0:22:37.840
<v Speaker 7>perhaps now in the later half of the year into

0:22:37.920 --> 0:22:40.199
<v Speaker 7>next year, but we don't want any one of that

0:22:40.359 --> 0:22:44.879
<v Speaker 7>to be delayed, So not baking any massive positive surprises

0:22:44.920 --> 0:22:47.240
<v Speaker 7>over the next quarter or two, but hoping for a

0:22:47.280 --> 0:22:48.440
<v Speaker 7>rebound by the end of the year.

0:22:48.680 --> 0:22:51.320
<v Speaker 3>So but a rebound, you're I mean, there's no declines here.

0:22:51.400 --> 0:22:53.719
<v Speaker 3>Let's be clear, it's just a question what is the

0:22:53.760 --> 0:22:56.200
<v Speaker 3>growth rate in tech spending? So just give us an

0:22:56.200 --> 0:22:58.720
<v Speaker 3>eyeball kind of where we are now, where it has been,

0:22:58.920 --> 0:22:59.879
<v Speaker 3>and where do you think it could go.

0:23:00.920 --> 0:23:03.159
<v Speaker 7>So let's talk about, for example, I'll throw out a

0:23:03.240 --> 0:23:05.919
<v Speaker 7>number a w as constant currency growth rate. That's a

0:23:05.920 --> 0:23:09.000
<v Speaker 7>big leading indicator of what's happening. Last quarter it was

0:23:09.040 --> 0:23:11.960
<v Speaker 7>thirteen percent in constant currency, the quarter before that twelve,

0:23:12.160 --> 0:23:14.360
<v Speaker 7>and the quarter before that twelve. We think this time

0:23:14.400 --> 0:23:16.920
<v Speaker 7>it comes to around fourteen to fifteen. But next quarter

0:23:16.960 --> 0:23:19.399
<v Speaker 7>again it comes to in that same range of about

0:23:19.400 --> 0:23:22.400
<v Speaker 7>fourteen to fifteen because now we are looking at stabilization

0:23:22.480 --> 0:23:24.600
<v Speaker 7>of the growth rates, but we do we expect that

0:23:24.760 --> 0:23:26.399
<v Speaker 7>to pick up by the end of the year. You

0:23:26.440 --> 0:23:29.440
<v Speaker 7>can correlate that for any company, whether it's Salesforce, whether

0:23:29.480 --> 0:23:33.159
<v Speaker 7>it's Microsoft, as your growth rate a similar chart in

0:23:33.240 --> 0:23:36.879
<v Speaker 7>the rate of growth of the growth rates rather than

0:23:36.880 --> 0:23:39.560
<v Speaker 7>anything else. And that's why I'm saying the next quarter

0:23:39.640 --> 0:23:42.480
<v Speaker 7>or two is where we see stabilization in that rather

0:23:42.560 --> 0:23:43.399
<v Speaker 7>than a big leg up.

0:23:44.119 --> 0:23:47.680
<v Speaker 3>So Neil, in your software space where you play, are

0:23:47.680 --> 0:23:49.400
<v Speaker 3>you trying to are your companies trying to go them

0:23:49.440 --> 0:23:50.479
<v Speaker 3>onto the AI trend?

0:23:50.640 --> 0:23:52.880
<v Speaker 2>And if so, how are they doing it?

0:23:53.560 --> 0:23:56.920
<v Speaker 8>Look, I think most of the companies that I cover

0:23:57.240 --> 0:24:00.840
<v Speaker 8>are in the initial phase of the AI wave, and

0:24:01.160 --> 0:24:04.959
<v Speaker 8>most of them are piloting new products, bringing up features

0:24:05.280 --> 0:24:10.520
<v Speaker 8>like copilot and others But one interesting fact that data

0:24:10.560 --> 0:24:14.280
<v Speaker 8>Doc pointed out very recently is three percent or so

0:24:14.400 --> 0:24:18.000
<v Speaker 8>of their arr is being driven by these gen AI

0:24:18.160 --> 0:24:21.560
<v Speaker 8>focused companies, which is interesting that you're still in very

0:24:21.560 --> 0:24:24.480
<v Speaker 8>early stages, and I think that will be a momentum

0:24:24.560 --> 0:24:25.680
<v Speaker 8>that will continue to grow.

0:24:26.119 --> 0:24:27.320
<v Speaker 2>Are we going to get Sneil?

0:24:27.359 --> 0:24:30.080
<v Speaker 3>Do you think like I came up when the Internet

0:24:30.200 --> 0:24:32.320
<v Speaker 3>was first started, you had companies from public that were

0:24:32.359 --> 0:24:34.760
<v Speaker 3>Internet names, whether it was America Online, whether it was

0:24:35.280 --> 0:24:35.800
<v Speaker 3>Google for.

0:24:35.800 --> 0:24:37.240
<v Speaker 2>Search, Facebook for social.

0:24:37.320 --> 0:24:40.840
<v Speaker 3>You had companies that defined or help define and then

0:24:40.880 --> 0:24:42.359
<v Speaker 3>so simple people like me could say, oh, if I

0:24:42.359 --> 0:24:45.040
<v Speaker 3>want explosures to the Internet by go by Google or

0:24:45.040 --> 0:24:48.120
<v Speaker 3>by Facebook, if I want social. Are we gonna have

0:24:48.240 --> 0:24:50.520
<v Speaker 3>AI specific companies coming public?

0:24:50.560 --> 0:24:51.000
<v Speaker 2>Do you think?

0:24:52.200 --> 0:24:55.520
<v Speaker 8>I think that's a move that everyone is watching. Of course,

0:24:55.560 --> 0:24:59.720
<v Speaker 8>we have companies like open ai and others that are

0:25:00.560 --> 0:25:05.240
<v Speaker 8>potentially growing in size and have a massive amount of

0:25:05.960 --> 0:25:09.320
<v Speaker 8>I mean say users, etc. So that's a market that

0:25:09.359 --> 0:25:11.639
<v Speaker 8>will continue to be on watch out. And there are

0:25:11.680 --> 0:25:15.600
<v Speaker 8>a number of other smaller companies that are coming up

0:25:15.920 --> 0:25:18.280
<v Speaker 8>in the AI space. I think over the course of

0:25:18.359 --> 0:25:20.320
<v Speaker 8>next twelve months we will see a lot of them

0:25:20.320 --> 0:25:20.879
<v Speaker 8>in the market.

0:25:21.280 --> 0:25:22.400
<v Speaker 2>All right, good stuff studio.

0:25:22.640 --> 0:25:25.959
<v Speaker 3>Roj Capal, senior software Anas Bloomberg Intelligence, joining us here

0:25:25.960 --> 0:25:28.080
<v Speaker 3>in a studio, and of course Ana rod ron, a

0:25:28.160 --> 0:25:31.640
<v Speaker 3>senior technaist for Bloomberg Intelligence at Chicago, breaking down what's

0:25:31.680 --> 0:25:35.159
<v Speaker 3>happening in the world of technologies. Apparently Salesforce, the rumor

0:25:35.200 --> 0:25:39.720
<v Speaker 3>discussions between Salesforce and software company Informatica cooling off here,

0:25:39.720 --> 0:25:43.320
<v Speaker 3>so we're seeing the Informatica stock down a little bit today.

0:25:43.320 --> 0:25:45.399
<v Speaker 3>We thank both of those guys for bringing us up

0:25:45.400 --> 0:25:46.000
<v Speaker 3>to speed here.

0:25:47.520 --> 0:25:51.400
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:25:51.480 --> 0:25:55.000
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecar Play and Android

0:25:55.040 --> 0:25:57.800
<v Speaker 1>Outo with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also listen

0:25:57.920 --> 0:26:01.040
<v Speaker 1>live on Amazon Alexa from our Flag New York station

0:26:01.400 --> 0:26:03.760
<v Speaker 1>just Say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven.

0:26:05.880 --> 0:26:09.679
<v Speaker 3>Coming into today's trading, SMP five hundred goes down roughly

0:26:09.760 --> 0:26:11.800
<v Speaker 3>five percent off of its recent high, and a lot

0:26:11.840 --> 0:26:13.080
<v Speaker 3>of folks were just saying, hey, is this.

0:26:13.119 --> 0:26:14.040
<v Speaker 2>A bump in the road.

0:26:14.600 --> 0:26:17.280
<v Speaker 3>Is this the beginning of a sustained drawdown which may

0:26:17.320 --> 0:26:19.959
<v Speaker 3>or may not be healthy for this market longer term.

0:26:20.359 --> 0:26:21.960
<v Speaker 3>That's some of the questions we've been hearing from a

0:26:21.960 --> 0:26:24.320
<v Speaker 3>lot of the smart folks who cover these markets. Sylvia

0:26:24.359 --> 0:26:27.119
<v Speaker 3>Jablonski Joints, and he's the chief executive officer and chief

0:26:27.160 --> 0:26:32.160
<v Speaker 3>investment officer at Defiance ETFs. Sylvia, how do you view

0:26:32.280 --> 0:26:35.080
<v Speaker 3>the trading we've seen over here over the last week

0:26:35.080 --> 0:26:37.359
<v Speaker 3>and a half here, this five percent pullback in the market,

0:26:37.440 --> 0:26:39.200
<v Speaker 3>How does that kind of strike.

0:26:38.880 --> 0:26:40.840
<v Speaker 2>You in terms of the overall market behavior?

0:26:42.280 --> 0:26:42.919
<v Speaker 9>Good morning.

0:26:43.080 --> 0:26:45.439
<v Speaker 10>Well, it's you know, it's been a painful couple of weeks,

0:26:45.440 --> 0:26:49.400
<v Speaker 10>that's for sure. You know, I think that some new

0:26:49.400 --> 0:26:51.720
<v Speaker 10>headwinds came into the market, right that that kind of

0:26:51.760 --> 0:26:52.480
<v Speaker 10>weren't there before.

0:26:52.560 --> 0:26:53.960
<v Speaker 9>We came out of the gate really strong.

0:26:54.080 --> 0:26:56.480
<v Speaker 10>The inflation readings were looking you know, kind of good

0:26:56.560 --> 0:27:00.640
<v Speaker 10>and solidly pointing downward, and then you know, we got

0:27:00.640 --> 0:27:04.320
<v Speaker 10>some potter than expected factory number jobs numbers CPI and

0:27:04.359 --> 0:27:07.320
<v Speaker 10>things like this recently. And so I think that until

0:27:07.359 --> 0:27:09.520
<v Speaker 10>we get the data going back in the direction that

0:27:09.560 --> 0:27:11.920
<v Speaker 10>we want it too, which is essentially you know, coming

0:27:11.960 --> 0:27:15.639
<v Speaker 10>in below estimates and downward on inflation, and then we

0:27:15.640 --> 0:27:18.080
<v Speaker 10>start to feel the security of the Fed potentially cutting

0:27:18.080 --> 0:27:20.760
<v Speaker 10>this year again, whether it's one or two times, and

0:27:20.840 --> 0:27:22.359
<v Speaker 10>you know, kind of just knowing that the foot the

0:27:22.400 --> 0:27:25.120
<v Speaker 10>FED put is still in play, right and that we're

0:27:25.160 --> 0:27:26.600
<v Speaker 10>not going to turn around the other way.

0:27:27.560 --> 0:27:29.120
<v Speaker 9>I think that'll help the markets turn around.

0:27:29.160 --> 0:27:31.320
<v Speaker 10>And then I think the other thing that you know

0:27:31.440 --> 0:27:34.800
<v Speaker 10>is sort of trepidations for investors is geopolitics. I mean,

0:27:34.920 --> 0:27:38.080
<v Speaker 10>there's there's some you know, notable things going on in

0:27:38.080 --> 0:27:40.760
<v Speaker 10>the world right now that I think really rocked markets

0:27:40.760 --> 0:27:41.560
<v Speaker 10>over the last.

0:27:41.320 --> 0:27:41.840
<v Speaker 9>Week and a half.

0:27:41.920 --> 0:27:43.480
<v Speaker 10>And then I you know, I think that there's a

0:27:43.560 --> 0:27:46.280
<v Speaker 10>need for kind of knowing what happens next there. But

0:27:46.359 --> 0:27:48.600
<v Speaker 10>in terms of like the fundamentals and the macro picture,

0:27:48.880 --> 0:27:51.440
<v Speaker 10>you know, I'm still very constructive and bullish on the market,

0:27:52.359 --> 0:27:54.840
<v Speaker 10>provided that those things, you know, don't surprise us out

0:27:54.840 --> 0:27:55.480
<v Speaker 10>of left field.

0:27:56.040 --> 0:27:57.719
<v Speaker 3>How About on the earnings front here, we're just kind

0:27:57.760 --> 0:27:59.720
<v Speaker 3>of another real busy week here for the S and

0:27:59.760 --> 0:28:02.520
<v Speaker 3>P five hundred earnings. What do you think this market

0:28:02.560 --> 0:28:03.320
<v Speaker 3>needs to see?

0:28:03.400 --> 0:28:04.400
<v Speaker 2>I mean, how dependent?

0:28:04.880 --> 0:28:07.639
<v Speaker 3>I mean, and obviously earnings matter, but it seems like

0:28:07.720 --> 0:28:09.399
<v Speaker 3>this is a market that's been pushed around by the

0:28:09.440 --> 0:28:10.399
<v Speaker 3>FED one way.

0:28:10.320 --> 0:28:11.800
<v Speaker 2>Or the other. Here, what are you looking for in

0:28:11.840 --> 0:28:12.840
<v Speaker 2>earnings this cycle?

0:28:14.160 --> 0:28:16.520
<v Speaker 10>So, I mean, I guess the you know, the good

0:28:16.560 --> 0:28:18.960
<v Speaker 10>thing about earnings is over the past couple of weeks

0:28:19.040 --> 0:28:21.280
<v Speaker 10>or so, a lot of analysts have revised their earnings

0:28:21.320 --> 0:28:24.159
<v Speaker 10>expectations downward, and so I think that you know, beats

0:28:24.160 --> 0:28:27.120
<v Speaker 10>are going to be easier to come by in terms

0:28:27.160 --> 0:28:27.720
<v Speaker 10>of earnings.

0:28:27.760 --> 0:28:29.840
<v Speaker 9>You know, we live in this world now where the

0:28:29.920 --> 0:28:30.560
<v Speaker 9>Mac seven.

0:28:30.720 --> 0:28:34.520
<v Speaker 10>You know, maybe we've subtracted Tesla from that list or

0:28:34.760 --> 0:28:36.480
<v Speaker 10>or you know a couple of names here and there.

0:28:36.560 --> 0:28:39.280
<v Speaker 10>But the top tech companies, let's call it as well

0:28:39.320 --> 0:28:44.240
<v Speaker 10>as Navidia are are really you know, names that investors

0:28:44.400 --> 0:28:46.640
<v Speaker 10>want good news from, and so then I think if

0:28:46.680 --> 0:28:50.680
<v Speaker 10>they deliver, that tends to broaden the rally, and that

0:28:50.760 --> 0:28:54.000
<v Speaker 10>tends to lift stocks in other sectors. You know, bank

0:28:54.040 --> 0:28:56.400
<v Speaker 10>earnings haven't been so bad, right and we haven't seen

0:28:56.920 --> 0:29:01.400
<v Speaker 10>kind of this this you know recent from that news.

0:29:01.400 --> 0:29:02.920
<v Speaker 10>So it's really those names that I think that have

0:29:02.960 --> 0:29:04.360
<v Speaker 10>to perform. So I'll be looking at that.

0:29:05.400 --> 0:29:08.200
<v Speaker 3>So, you know, one of the the big themes last

0:29:08.280 --> 0:29:10.760
<v Speaker 3>year and coming into this year was AI and obviously

0:29:10.880 --> 0:29:11.600
<v Speaker 3>Nvidia and all.

0:29:11.520 --> 0:29:12.360
<v Speaker 2>Those types of things.

0:29:12.400 --> 0:29:15.360
<v Speaker 3>We saw some pretty violent action on Friday some of

0:29:15.360 --> 0:29:16.520
<v Speaker 3>those names kind of coming down.

0:29:16.600 --> 0:29:19.160
<v Speaker 2>Was that kind of a technical move for you or

0:29:19.200 --> 0:29:19.360
<v Speaker 2>do you.

0:29:19.360 --> 0:29:21.440
<v Speaker 3>Feel like the bloom is kind of coming off the

0:29:21.520 --> 0:29:23.719
<v Speaker 3>roads a little bit on some of those AI driven

0:29:24.000 --> 0:29:25.040
<v Speaker 3>thematic names.

0:29:26.320 --> 0:29:29.320
<v Speaker 10>So I think that this is you know I always

0:29:29.360 --> 0:29:31.280
<v Speaker 10>talk about like buy on the dip opportunities.

0:29:31.720 --> 0:29:32.280
<v Speaker 9>This is it.

0:29:32.400 --> 0:29:34.880
<v Speaker 10>I mean, I think that with some of the top names,

0:29:34.880 --> 0:29:37.920
<v Speaker 10>if you're looking to get invested in AI or quantum computing,

0:29:38.000 --> 0:29:40.840
<v Speaker 10>and you know you're a stock picker, you're an ETF buyer,

0:29:41.400 --> 0:29:44.160
<v Speaker 10>these five to ten percent recent pullbacks and some of

0:29:44.200 --> 0:29:46.760
<v Speaker 10>these top names are really good opportunities to get back in.

0:29:46.880 --> 0:29:50.640
<v Speaker 10>You know, AI innovation isn't going anywhere. It's just in

0:29:50.680 --> 0:29:53.120
<v Speaker 10>the beginning. It's it's in its infancy. And when you

0:29:53.160 --> 0:29:56.760
<v Speaker 10>think about when other companies and sectors start talking about

0:29:56.800 --> 0:29:59.320
<v Speaker 10>how AI has transformed what they do, whether it's the

0:29:59.360 --> 0:30:03.440
<v Speaker 10>defend section or you know, banks talking about better risk mitigation,

0:30:04.080 --> 0:30:09.760
<v Speaker 10>pharmaceuticals talking about more efficient drug discovery, price discovery, you know,

0:30:09.960 --> 0:30:12.440
<v Speaker 10>more effective surgeries in the healthcare system, things like this.

0:30:13.040 --> 0:30:14.480
<v Speaker 9>You know you're going to start to.

0:30:14.480 --> 0:30:17.920
<v Speaker 10>See how compelling it is to continue to buy these stocks.

0:30:17.960 --> 0:30:20.360
<v Speaker 10>Is that innovation builds out and you know, we're barely

0:30:20.360 --> 0:30:23.360
<v Speaker 10>scratching the surface with supercomputing and quantum competing too. So

0:30:23.800 --> 0:30:25.560
<v Speaker 10>when you have all of this data, it has to

0:30:25.560 --> 0:30:28.440
<v Speaker 10>be processed quickly. In order for that to happen, you're

0:30:28.440 --> 0:30:30.680
<v Speaker 10>going to have to kind of like buy up supercomputers

0:30:30.720 --> 0:30:32.920
<v Speaker 10>and quantum computers and things like this too. So I

0:30:33.000 --> 0:30:35.240
<v Speaker 10>just think that it's a great time to get back

0:30:35.280 --> 0:30:37.320
<v Speaker 10>in or get in if you know, if you've kind

0:30:37.320 --> 0:30:37.920
<v Speaker 10>of had FOMO.

0:30:38.760 --> 0:30:41.080
<v Speaker 9>Even though the stock prices are high, they have pulled back.

0:30:41.600 --> 0:30:44.640
<v Speaker 3>What's the I guess you know, it defines ETFs. Where

0:30:44.680 --> 0:30:48.440
<v Speaker 3>are you guys seeing the fund flows these days?

0:30:49.880 --> 0:30:53.160
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, so two places, well the three places really, So

0:30:53.520 --> 0:30:55.959
<v Speaker 10>we see a lot of flows into target income funds.

0:30:55.960 --> 0:30:58.520
<v Speaker 10>So the investor that just likes to have that, you know,

0:30:58.640 --> 0:31:00.920
<v Speaker 10>double digit monthly return at the end of the month

0:31:00.960 --> 0:31:02.920
<v Speaker 10>and have broad based index exposure.

0:31:02.960 --> 0:31:04.160
<v Speaker 9>So we see a lot of flows.

0:31:03.880 --> 0:31:08.719
<v Speaker 10>Into our SPYT and iwmy off of investors that want dividends.

0:31:08.920 --> 0:31:11.320
<v Speaker 10>But I would say the fun that people are talking

0:31:11.320 --> 0:31:13.600
<v Speaker 10>about the most and has kind of grown the most,

0:31:13.600 --> 0:31:17.440
<v Speaker 10>even though it's been around kind of the longest is quantum.

0:31:17.040 --> 0:31:19.920
<v Speaker 9>And that's the AI and machine learning what we were

0:31:19.960 --> 0:31:20.560
<v Speaker 9>just talking about.

0:31:20.600 --> 0:31:22.480
<v Speaker 10>You know, I think a lot of investors realize that

0:31:23.000 --> 0:31:25.680
<v Speaker 10>Navidia and AMD while they all know stocks, there's got

0:31:25.720 --> 0:31:28.040
<v Speaker 10>to be something else. They don't necessarily know who the

0:31:28.080 --> 0:31:30.120
<v Speaker 10>winners are going to be, or who that's something else,

0:31:30.160 --> 0:31:32.320
<v Speaker 10>what that something else is, And so they liked the

0:31:33.000 --> 0:31:35.800
<v Speaker 10>you know, equal weighted basket of seventy stocks that are

0:31:35.840 --> 0:31:41.200
<v Speaker 10>covering semiconductors, graphics, you know, technology, computers, cloud, cyber things

0:31:41.240 --> 0:31:42.960
<v Speaker 10>like this, and so we've seen a lot of interest

0:31:43.040 --> 0:31:45.120
<v Speaker 10>there from investors.

0:31:45.280 --> 0:31:47.400
<v Speaker 3>How about only the fixed income side, I mean, are

0:31:47.440 --> 0:31:49.080
<v Speaker 3>you seeing money flow in? Because I mean you can

0:31:49.400 --> 0:31:50.920
<v Speaker 3>sit there at a two year treasure, you can get

0:31:50.920 --> 0:31:53.520
<v Speaker 3>close to the five percent. I know some folks were

0:31:53.520 --> 0:31:56.520
<v Speaker 3>saying in some ETFs they were seeing like the folks

0:31:56.560 --> 0:31:59.120
<v Speaker 3>at bond blocks, for example, will focus on ETFs seeing

0:31:59.160 --> 0:32:00.479
<v Speaker 3>a lot of fun flow into there.

0:32:00.480 --> 0:32:01.360
<v Speaker 2>Are you seeing that as well?

0:32:02.720 --> 0:32:02.960
<v Speaker 7>Yeah?

0:32:02.960 --> 0:32:04.960
<v Speaker 10>And so when the market pulls back, I mean we

0:32:04.960 --> 0:32:06.720
<v Speaker 10>definitely see that. We don't see that on our side,

0:32:06.720 --> 0:32:08.520
<v Speaker 10>we don't really have those types of products. But when

0:32:08.640 --> 0:32:12.360
<v Speaker 10>when you see that, it's usually you know, it was

0:32:12.520 --> 0:32:14.760
<v Speaker 10>it was years of inflation that was too high and

0:32:14.800 --> 0:32:17.160
<v Speaker 10>stocks thats just weren't running like a twenty twenty two

0:32:17.320 --> 0:32:19.280
<v Speaker 10>tech recession where you're going to put your money at

0:32:19.320 --> 0:32:21.760
<v Speaker 10>five percent treasuries made sense, but I would argue that

0:32:21.800 --> 0:32:24.360
<v Speaker 10>this year is different, and those trillions of dollars that

0:32:24.400 --> 0:32:26.880
<v Speaker 10>are sitting in those products and on the sidelines, I

0:32:26.920 --> 0:32:29.360
<v Speaker 10>think we'll eventually make their way back into the market.

0:32:29.400 --> 0:32:31.320
<v Speaker 10>You know, Yes, we've had a five percent pullback, but

0:32:31.320 --> 0:32:34.120
<v Speaker 10>look at Broadway secuity performance this year. I think you'd

0:32:34.200 --> 0:32:37.040
<v Speaker 10>rather be invested there than you wouldn't treasuries. And I

0:32:37.040 --> 0:32:40.160
<v Speaker 10>think that that'll slowly start to you know, revert back

0:32:40.160 --> 0:32:43.600
<v Speaker 10>into the markets, particularly if we get you know, a broadening.

0:32:43.160 --> 0:32:45.360
<v Speaker 9>Of performance in the markets. But for now, you know,

0:32:45.880 --> 0:32:46.760
<v Speaker 9>market pulls back yup.

0:32:46.800 --> 0:32:49.120
<v Speaker 10>Geopolitical risk you have, you know, a FED that's kind

0:32:49.120 --> 0:32:52.920
<v Speaker 10>of you know, less less iffy about those rate cuts

0:32:52.920 --> 0:32:54.600
<v Speaker 10>and things like that, and some investors tend to flee

0:32:54.640 --> 0:32:56.120
<v Speaker 10>to safety, you know.

0:32:56.520 --> 0:32:57.920
<v Speaker 3>So if I know one of the names on your list,

0:32:57.960 --> 0:32:59.760
<v Speaker 3>and we've talked about it in the past, is IBM

0:33:00.560 --> 0:33:04.480
<v Speaker 3>in the world of AI or in quantum computing, what

0:33:04.560 --> 0:33:06.880
<v Speaker 3>does it the likes of an IBM play.

0:33:08.280 --> 0:33:08.480
<v Speaker 7>Yeah.

0:33:08.480 --> 0:33:10.240
<v Speaker 10>So it's so funny because I think, and we talked

0:33:10.240 --> 0:33:12.600
<v Speaker 10>about this before too, it's almost like that sleeper tech

0:33:13.320 --> 0:33:16.640
<v Speaker 10>tech stock, right, just what happened to IBM, And I

0:33:16.640 --> 0:33:18.360
<v Speaker 10>would say that they're back, you know, I mean they

0:33:18.360 --> 0:33:20.440
<v Speaker 10>were always here, they had Watson. They're sort of the

0:33:20.480 --> 0:33:24.600
<v Speaker 10>first you know, true AI play I think, but they

0:33:24.640 --> 0:33:26.960
<v Speaker 10>just weren't kind of known for it, I guess. And

0:33:27.000 --> 0:33:28.920
<v Speaker 10>now they're coming out of the woodworks because they're doing

0:33:28.960 --> 0:33:31.880
<v Speaker 10>so much work in quantum computing and supercomputing and they're

0:33:31.960 --> 0:33:35.880
<v Speaker 10>you know, kind of providing services to Fortune five hundred

0:33:35.920 --> 0:33:39.040
<v Speaker 10>companies using their AI technology. But then they're also building

0:33:39.040 --> 0:33:42.080
<v Speaker 10>and scoping out quantum computing. So they have deals with

0:33:42.600 --> 0:33:45.600
<v Speaker 10>Cleveland Clinic to to you know, create better drugs and

0:33:45.600 --> 0:33:47.520
<v Speaker 10>pharmaceutical discovery processes.

0:33:47.560 --> 0:33:50.880
<v Speaker 9>They have a project with Korea Quantum where they're looking.

0:33:50.680 --> 0:33:54.800
<v Speaker 10>At, you know, more precise information around aerospace and defense

0:33:54.880 --> 0:33:59.240
<v Speaker 10>and then also you know military types of logistical projects

0:33:59.280 --> 0:34:01.120
<v Speaker 10>that they're working on. And you know, you think about

0:34:01.120 --> 0:34:04.000
<v Speaker 10>the US government pumping into pumping money into you know,

0:34:04.320 --> 0:34:07.080
<v Speaker 10>kind of defense and quantum competing in AI as it

0:34:07.120 --> 0:34:09.640
<v Speaker 10>relates to that, You're going to see IBM have a

0:34:10.000 --> 0:34:11.840
<v Speaker 10>good seat at the table I think in the future.

0:34:12.200 --> 0:34:14.240
<v Speaker 3>All right, Sylvia, thanks so much for joining us. Always

0:34:14.239 --> 0:34:16.480
<v Speaker 3>appreciate getting a few minutes of your time. Sylvia Jablonski,

0:34:16.560 --> 0:34:20.120
<v Speaker 3>Chief Executive Officer and Chief Information Officer Defiance ETF.

0:34:22.760 --> 0:34:26.640
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:34:26.719 --> 0:34:30.280
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecar Play and Android

0:34:30.280 --> 0:34:33.440
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business. You can also listen live

0:34:33.560 --> 0:34:36.719
<v Speaker 1>on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station Just

0:34:36.800 --> 0:34:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:34:40.640 --> 0:34:44.160
<v Speaker 3>Last week, Alex and I were at the Bloomberg BNF

0:34:44.520 --> 0:34:47.480
<v Speaker 3>conference that's New Energy Finance. These are the folks that

0:34:47.680 --> 0:34:51.640
<v Speaker 3>really look at the energy space in depth, including all

0:34:51.640 --> 0:34:55.719
<v Speaker 3>the new energy and new energy businesses that are being created.

0:34:55.440 --> 0:34:56.000
<v Speaker 2>Across the world.

0:34:56.000 --> 0:34:59.040
<v Speaker 3>Where we're looking at from the business perspective of global energy.

0:34:59.520 --> 0:35:01.680
<v Speaker 3>They had great conference last week in New York, some

0:35:01.840 --> 0:35:03.520
<v Speaker 3>really smart people. They were talking about some of the

0:35:03.560 --> 0:35:06.360
<v Speaker 3>bigger picture, bigger picture issues and what's getting done on

0:35:06.400 --> 0:35:08.759
<v Speaker 3>the ground. David dharerty joints US here today. He's head

0:35:08.760 --> 0:35:12.640
<v Speaker 3>of Oil and Renewable Fuels Research at Bloomberg BNEF here

0:35:12.680 --> 0:35:15.360
<v Speaker 3>in our Bloomberg Interactive Broker Studios. So, David, great conference

0:35:15.360 --> 0:35:17.759
<v Speaker 3>you guys had last week. I learned a lot because

0:35:17.760 --> 0:35:20.040
<v Speaker 3>I'm not an energy geek like Alex is, so I

0:35:20.120 --> 0:35:23.279
<v Speaker 3>learned a lot here just buy and large. What's the

0:35:23.360 --> 0:35:26.360
<v Speaker 3>view of the big energy companies here in the US

0:35:26.400 --> 0:35:31.000
<v Speaker 3>towards making that migration to maybe greener energy.

0:35:31.080 --> 0:35:33.279
<v Speaker 2>How committed are they? How long of a path do

0:35:33.280 --> 0:35:35.520
<v Speaker 2>you think this will be for global energy?

0:35:35.680 --> 0:35:38.800
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, long path, regardless whether you're European or American and

0:35:39.200 --> 0:35:44.080
<v Speaker 11>an oil producer, completely different angles. US companies have gone

0:35:44.120 --> 0:35:46.319
<v Speaker 11>into sort of a cleaner molecule when they're willing to

0:35:46.360 --> 0:35:49.000
<v Speaker 11>invest in low carbon tech, so think of like renewable

0:35:49.000 --> 0:35:52.799
<v Speaker 11>fuels ccs, hydrogen, and the Europeans have pretty much piled

0:35:52.840 --> 0:35:55.560
<v Speaker 11>into a bit of everything, but a lot of clean electrons, wind,

0:35:55.719 --> 0:35:59.600
<v Speaker 11>solar batteries, evs. Very different cultures. You know, Europe doesn't

0:35:59.600 --> 0:36:02.120
<v Speaker 11>produce as much oil as the US, so you know,

0:36:02.239 --> 0:36:03.520
<v Speaker 11>default position makes sense.

0:36:03.560 --> 0:36:06.040
<v Speaker 3>I think are you surprised just looking at I'm looking

0:36:06.080 --> 0:36:08.560
<v Speaker 3>at Brent crude here, You've got your Irish accent. I'm

0:36:08.600 --> 0:36:11.440
<v Speaker 3>assuming you look at Brent more than my WTI crude

0:36:11.440 --> 0:36:13.760
<v Speaker 3>oil just under eighty seven dollars per barrel.

0:36:14.080 --> 0:36:15.360
<v Speaker 2>I could make a case that it should be a

0:36:15.400 --> 0:36:16.239
<v Speaker 2>lot higher.

0:36:16.320 --> 0:36:18.440
<v Speaker 3>Given what's going on in the world with in the

0:36:18.480 --> 0:36:21.719
<v Speaker 3>Middle East, in Ukraine, with Russia and so on.

0:36:21.840 --> 0:36:23.200
<v Speaker 2>What's going on in it energy markets?

0:36:23.320 --> 0:36:26.040
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, everybody's looking at one hundred dollars, right, three digits

0:36:26.080 --> 0:36:28.920
<v Speaker 11>that the eyes are sort of focused on. The market's

0:36:28.960 --> 0:36:30.680
<v Speaker 11>just completely different to the way it used to be. Right,

0:36:30.680 --> 0:36:32.879
<v Speaker 11>if you had an attack on Iran five years ago,

0:36:32.920 --> 0:36:36.480
<v Speaker 11>you would have seen fifteen dollars upside on the price.

0:36:36.560 --> 0:36:39.759
<v Speaker 11>The market's one smarter. We've satellites, we can track things.

0:36:39.800 --> 0:36:42.239
<v Speaker 11>We've got people like Bloomberg, you know, counting ships going

0:36:42.239 --> 0:36:44.840
<v Speaker 11>in and out of regions. But also the market was

0:36:44.840 --> 0:36:47.080
<v Speaker 11>braced for it. It wasn't news, right, it wasn't.

0:36:47.120 --> 0:36:47.480
<v Speaker 5>It wasn't.

0:36:47.520 --> 0:36:49.920
<v Speaker 11>I guess we're expecting something to happen. The price is

0:36:49.960 --> 0:36:52.200
<v Speaker 11>built in. We've had a couple of months of sort

0:36:52.200 --> 0:36:54.680
<v Speaker 11>of like anxiety around the oil price, what could happen

0:36:54.680 --> 0:36:57.640
<v Speaker 11>to fundamentals? And then it was a bit anticlimactic. I

0:36:57.640 --> 0:37:00.400
<v Speaker 11>guess in the end, I mean.

0:37:00.640 --> 0:37:01.600
<v Speaker 2>I guess what's changed?

0:37:01.680 --> 0:37:03.759
<v Speaker 3>Just we're talking about it in the break here, I mean,

0:37:03.960 --> 0:37:06.120
<v Speaker 3>just in the blink of an eye. It seems like

0:37:06.160 --> 0:37:08.520
<v Speaker 3>the United States has gone from a big, big net

0:37:08.600 --> 0:37:11.799
<v Speaker 3>importer of oil so now being a pretty big net

0:37:11.960 --> 0:37:15.520
<v Speaker 3>exporter of oil. What does that mean for the global markets?

0:37:15.520 --> 0:37:17.160
<v Speaker 3>Does that mean we don't have to worry about Opek

0:37:17.200 --> 0:37:18.120
<v Speaker 3>or any of those guys.

0:37:18.440 --> 0:37:19.840
<v Speaker 11>Absolutely have to worry about Opeking.

0:37:20.000 --> 0:37:20.399
<v Speaker 2>Those guys.

0:37:20.480 --> 0:37:21.279
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, yeah, I.

0:37:21.200 --> 0:37:24.520
<v Speaker 11>Mean, if you look at the world of sanctions about

0:37:25.520 --> 0:37:28.160
<v Speaker 11>just over, just over, the amount of Saudi Arabia and

0:37:28.200 --> 0:37:32.879
<v Speaker 11>exports is now sanctioned Venezuela around and Russia. Right, that's huge.

0:37:32.920 --> 0:37:35.240
<v Speaker 11>You're taking let's say, the equivalent of the biggest producer

0:37:35.560 --> 0:37:39.480
<v Speaker 11>that's falling under our form of sanctions. US produces a

0:37:39.480 --> 0:37:41.160
<v Speaker 11>bunch of oil, yes, but it's not the right kind

0:37:41.200 --> 0:37:42.800
<v Speaker 11>of oil for the US, so it's got to swap

0:37:42.800 --> 0:37:43.680
<v Speaker 11>it out into the market.

0:37:44.040 --> 0:37:45.919
<v Speaker 2>You know, there's a lighter crud.

0:37:46.000 --> 0:37:48.160
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, exactly where You've got really great refineries here that

0:37:48.200 --> 0:37:51.640
<v Speaker 11>are built for Venezuela and Mexican oil. Right, Okay, so

0:37:51.680 --> 0:37:53.920
<v Speaker 11>there's this swap happening. And then if you bring in

0:37:54.000 --> 0:37:58.120
<v Speaker 11>sort of disruptions around straights from US et cetera, any

0:37:58.200 --> 0:38:01.319
<v Speaker 11>disruption and shipping adds back clog into the whole, you know,

0:38:01.360 --> 0:38:03.040
<v Speaker 11>the pipeline of how to get oil from A to

0:38:03.080 --> 0:38:06.360
<v Speaker 11>B where it's needed. So the market's changing, the disruptions

0:38:06.400 --> 0:38:09.040
<v Speaker 11>are changing. The US is a big producer and we've

0:38:09.080 --> 0:38:11.200
<v Speaker 11>seen that makeup for some of those OPEC cuts in

0:38:11.200 --> 0:38:13.960
<v Speaker 11>the last couple of months, but absolutely still got to

0:38:13.960 --> 0:38:16.800
<v Speaker 11>pay attention to what OPEC seeing and those big sanctioning exports.

0:38:16.920 --> 0:38:18.360
<v Speaker 2>Well, let's go to the sanctions.

0:38:18.360 --> 0:38:20.320
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I'm just I don't know anything about the

0:38:20.360 --> 0:38:22.560
<v Speaker 3>energy market other than what alex Steel tells me. But

0:38:22.640 --> 0:38:25.520
<v Speaker 3>it just doesn't seem like sanctions really work on it.

0:38:25.520 --> 0:38:28.120
<v Speaker 3>The oil finds its way around, whether it's from Russia

0:38:28.160 --> 0:38:31.279
<v Speaker 3>to India. India refines it and then it ends up

0:38:31.320 --> 0:38:33.680
<v Speaker 3>in my car in New Jersey. I mean, how does

0:38:34.120 --> 0:38:35.600
<v Speaker 3>the sanctions work from your perspective?

0:38:36.280 --> 0:38:38.279
<v Speaker 11>I think they're probably working the way they're intended to

0:38:38.400 --> 0:38:40.600
<v Speaker 11>this time. But this sort of round and sanctions on

0:38:40.640 --> 0:38:43.000
<v Speaker 11>Russian Russian oil is just meant to be different to

0:38:43.000 --> 0:38:44.799
<v Speaker 11>those on around Right. If you think about Iran, it

0:38:44.840 --> 0:38:47.160
<v Speaker 11>was like stop exporting, stop producing, they want to contain it.

0:38:47.640 --> 0:38:49.680
<v Speaker 11>We've saw obviously volumes get to China about one and

0:38:49.760 --> 0:38:51.560
<v Speaker 11>a half million hours a day go to China from

0:38:51.560 --> 0:38:55.399
<v Speaker 11>around right, So pretty big Russia. The idea was not

0:38:55.560 --> 0:38:58.080
<v Speaker 11>to shock the market right by taking this big, big

0:38:58.120 --> 0:39:00.680
<v Speaker 11>export off the off of the market. About four million

0:39:00.680 --> 0:39:03.279
<v Speaker 11>bars per they exported out of Russia. That's huge, right,

0:39:03.440 --> 0:39:06.520
<v Speaker 11>much bigger than a run election year. They don't want

0:39:06.520 --> 0:39:09.040
<v Speaker 11>to rock the boat too much. Gasoline prices even when

0:39:09.080 --> 0:39:12.280
<v Speaker 11>you're seeing evs in California breach like twenty percent of sales.

0:39:12.719 --> 0:39:14.480
<v Speaker 11>You tell your average person on the street that and

0:39:14.480 --> 0:39:17.680
<v Speaker 11>they'll say, why is my gasoline gallon so expensive? Right?

0:39:17.960 --> 0:39:21.640
<v Speaker 11>Super sensitive election? You're us people like to drive. You

0:39:21.680 --> 0:39:23.240
<v Speaker 11>don't want to have that taken out of the pocket.

0:39:23.280 --> 0:39:26.160
<v Speaker 3>Right, all right, So as you sit back and take

0:39:26.160 --> 0:39:28.439
<v Speaker 3>a look at your history is with oil trading, oil,

0:39:28.480 --> 0:39:30.439
<v Speaker 3>all the distillates, all that kind of stuff you're from.

0:39:30.840 --> 0:39:32.799
<v Speaker 3>You know, you're kind of like John Talkern, we're kind

0:39:32.840 --> 0:39:34.960
<v Speaker 3>of old energy people. But you live in a world

0:39:35.000 --> 0:39:37.600
<v Speaker 3>of new energy finance. How do you think, Like if

0:39:37.640 --> 0:39:41.319
<v Speaker 3>you what's what are the NEF people saying ten years now,

0:39:41.320 --> 0:39:45.840
<v Speaker 3>twenty years now, what percentage of global energy supply will.

0:39:45.640 --> 0:39:48.719
<v Speaker 2>Be you know, lack of a better word, green.

0:39:48.600 --> 0:39:50.800
<v Speaker 3>Versus kind of the fossil fuels is or a feeling

0:39:50.840 --> 0:39:52.240
<v Speaker 3>that that could be material.

0:39:52.680 --> 0:39:53.600
<v Speaker 2>It will be material.

0:39:53.680 --> 0:39:56.640
<v Speaker 11>But it's important to put into context what's growth versus

0:39:56.640 --> 0:39:59.320
<v Speaker 11>what's currently existing. Right, the world isn't slowing down and

0:39:59.360 --> 0:40:02.239
<v Speaker 11>its energy can asumption growth story. So you're seeing more green,

0:40:02.280 --> 0:40:04.239
<v Speaker 11>but it's meeting a lot of that upside that growth. Right,

0:40:04.600 --> 0:40:06.520
<v Speaker 11>You're still seeing a lot of fossil fuels in the mix.

0:40:06.600 --> 0:40:11.160
<v Speaker 11>That's way harder to displace. So you're seeing evs being

0:40:11.239 --> 0:40:13.960
<v Speaker 11>like really high percentage of sales in places like China,

0:40:14.040 --> 0:40:18.200
<v Speaker 11>but you're still seeing healthy internal combustion engine sales in China, right,

0:40:18.880 --> 0:40:21.719
<v Speaker 11>That growth and mobility demand in markets like that. It's

0:40:21.719 --> 0:40:24.239
<v Speaker 11>just outstripping anything we can do to disrupt the sort

0:40:24.280 --> 0:40:26.920
<v Speaker 11>of status quo of a fossil any.

0:40:26.680 --> 0:40:30.000
<v Speaker 2>So, where's the argument today, which I've heard for twenty years?

0:40:30.360 --> 0:40:33.720
<v Speaker 2>Peak oil? Are we is that even a concept?

0:40:33.880 --> 0:40:36.520
<v Speaker 3>Or is because the world economy is growing that there

0:40:36.560 --> 0:40:39.439
<v Speaker 3>always will be I guess increasing demand for oil.

0:40:39.480 --> 0:40:39.839
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:40:39.960 --> 0:40:42.560
<v Speaker 11>I mean, yeah, we are house here is twenty twenty nine, right,

0:40:42.600 --> 0:40:45.120
<v Speaker 11>but it's you know, it's modeling, it's it's oil at

0:40:45.120 --> 0:40:49.440
<v Speaker 11>twenty twenty nine demand exactly, Yeah, twenty twenty nine. For

0:40:49.520 --> 0:40:52.520
<v Speaker 11>every EV displaced, does an airplane going into the sky

0:40:52.960 --> 0:40:55.040
<v Speaker 11>or demand for plastics. Some things are a lot easier

0:40:55.040 --> 0:40:57.760
<v Speaker 11>to displace than others. But road is important. It's really interesting.

0:40:57.800 --> 0:41:00.360
<v Speaker 11>It's forty five percent of all oil consumers wheels on

0:41:00.440 --> 0:41:03.240
<v Speaker 11>the ground. Right, So this electric story that people sometimes

0:41:03.239 --> 0:41:05.680
<v Speaker 11>shift off and say whatever, Yep, that's the one to watch,

0:41:05.719 --> 0:41:06.000
<v Speaker 11>I think.

0:41:06.160 --> 0:41:08.320
<v Speaker 3>So, I mean, do you think that, Like here, Tesla

0:41:08.400 --> 0:41:11.200
<v Speaker 3>stocks down over forty percent year to date, Some people

0:41:11.239 --> 0:41:13.800
<v Speaker 3>think we've seen peak EV demand.

0:41:14.080 --> 0:41:14.560
<v Speaker 2>What do you think?

0:41:14.560 --> 0:41:15.880
<v Speaker 3>Because I know in other parts of the world it

0:41:16.360 --> 0:41:17.640
<v Speaker 3>continues to grow dramatically.

0:41:17.880 --> 0:41:19.640
<v Speaker 11>You know, that will get clicks in a headline, but

0:41:19.880 --> 0:41:22.880
<v Speaker 11>realistically that's the world is not just Tesla when it

0:41:22.920 --> 0:41:24.919
<v Speaker 11>comes to EV's and if you look outside of the US,

0:41:25.000 --> 0:41:28.040
<v Speaker 11>there's a huge range of automakers piling into that. China,

0:41:28.160 --> 0:41:31.240
<v Speaker 11>Europe over twenty percent of sales. We're at the point

0:41:31.680 --> 0:41:35.320
<v Speaker 11>the US might not be. California is rapid tipping point.

0:41:36.040 --> 0:41:38.440
<v Speaker 11>Some will go faster than that. There's in some some wones, right,

0:41:39.080 --> 0:41:41.080
<v Speaker 11>there's a lot of growth there still in some markets.

0:41:41.160 --> 0:41:43.279
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, I thanks to Matt Miller, I drove

0:41:43.360 --> 0:41:46.399
<v Speaker 3>testra of the F one fifty electric thing.

0:41:46.440 --> 0:41:48.759
<v Speaker 2>That was a right beast man. That is really cool.

0:41:48.760 --> 0:41:50.640
<v Speaker 3>So I could see a bunch of the F one

0:41:50.680 --> 0:41:53.080
<v Speaker 3>to fifty people switching over electric. It looked, I mean

0:41:53.200 --> 0:41:56.439
<v Speaker 3>looked great, drove great had huge power, so good stuff.

0:41:56.440 --> 0:41:59.280
<v Speaker 3>Will see how it goes Tesla earnings after the closes tomorrow.

0:41:59.320 --> 0:42:01.440
<v Speaker 3>Listened in that it's called David Dharty joins us here.

0:42:01.520 --> 0:42:03.200
<v Speaker 3>Appreciate getting a couple of minutes of his time. He's

0:42:03.200 --> 0:42:06.720
<v Speaker 3>set of Oil and Renewable Fuels research at Bloomberg NEEF.

0:42:07.080 --> 0:42:09.520
<v Speaker 3>That's new Energy finance for the people that don't know.

0:42:09.760 --> 0:42:11.920
<v Speaker 3>Joining us here in our Bloomberg Interactive Brooker Studio.

0:42:12.239 --> 0:42:16.759
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:42:16.960 --> 0:42:20.640
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you'll get your podcasts. Listen live each weekday,

0:42:20.760 --> 0:42:23.719
<v Speaker 1>ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot com, the

0:42:23.840 --> 0:42:27.279
<v Speaker 1>iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app. You

0:42:27.320 --> 0:42:30.520
<v Speaker 1>can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube and

0:42:30.680 --> 0:42:32.280
<v Speaker 1>always on the Bloomberg terminal