WEBVTT - Where does energy come from?

0:00:06.080 --> 0:00:08.240
<v Speaker 1>One of my favorite things about physics is that it

0:00:08.320 --> 0:00:11.800
<v Speaker 1>lets us think concretely and carefully about the basic nature

0:00:11.920 --> 0:00:14.960
<v Speaker 1>of our experience. What is space? What is matter? What

0:00:15.080 --> 0:00:18.680
<v Speaker 1>is time? What's a particle? Why are there waves everywhere?

0:00:18.880 --> 0:00:22.720
<v Speaker 1>Physics helps us convert these squishy conversations on rooftops over

0:00:22.760 --> 0:00:27.400
<v Speaker 1>smoke banana peels into robust mathematics. The math doesn't require

0:00:27.520 --> 0:00:30.480
<v Speaker 1>persuasion or a clever choice of words. It's either right

0:00:30.680 --> 0:00:33.320
<v Speaker 1>or it's wrong. So instead of answering a question about

0:00:33.320 --> 0:00:35.480
<v Speaker 1>the nature of the squish universe, we get to poke

0:00:35.560 --> 0:00:39.480
<v Speaker 1>and prod our mathematical description of it. Sometimes that gives

0:00:39.520 --> 0:00:42.600
<v Speaker 1>us real insight, like when relativity tells us that distance

0:00:42.600 --> 0:00:46.280
<v Speaker 1>and velocity have to be relative rather than absolute, because

0:00:46.320 --> 0:00:50.960
<v Speaker 1>that's the only mathematical model that describes the universe we see.

0:00:51.080 --> 0:00:54.320
<v Speaker 1>Other times it surprises us by telling us that we

0:00:54.440 --> 0:00:57.960
<v Speaker 1>might just be asking the wrong question. Maybe the things

0:00:58.000 --> 0:01:02.240
<v Speaker 1>we thought were important just reveal our fundamental misunderstandings of

0:01:02.400 --> 0:01:05.520
<v Speaker 1>the universe and how it works. Today we'll be asking

0:01:05.520 --> 0:01:08.600
<v Speaker 1>what physics can tell us about energy, What is it?

0:01:08.720 --> 0:01:12.480
<v Speaker 1>And more importantly, where does it come from? Welcome to

0:01:12.600 --> 0:01:15.959
<v Speaker 1>Daniel and Kelly's Extraordinary energetic Universe.

0:01:29.959 --> 0:01:31.479
<v Speaker 2>Hello. I'm Kelly Wiener Smith.

0:01:31.560 --> 0:01:34.959
<v Speaker 3>I study space and parasites and I just got over

0:01:35.000 --> 0:01:36.880
<v Speaker 3>having the flu for a week and I really could

0:01:36.920 --> 0:01:37.560
<v Speaker 3>have used energy.

0:01:39.240 --> 0:01:41.760
<v Speaker 1>Hi. I'm Daniel. I'm a particle physicist and I love

0:01:41.800 --> 0:01:45.199
<v Speaker 1>how Kelly opens the podcast with so much energy every time.

0:01:46.240 --> 0:01:48.320
<v Speaker 2>Okay, well we both have a lot of energy.

0:01:48.840 --> 0:01:52.000
<v Speaker 3>Speaking of energy, do you rely on caffeine? What is

0:01:52.040 --> 0:01:53.680
<v Speaker 3>your favorite form of liquid energy?

0:01:54.040 --> 0:01:57.160
<v Speaker 1>I do rely on caffeine. I'm drinking coffee right now here.

0:01:57.200 --> 0:02:05.360
<v Speaker 1>You go, Oh oh for you asmr. Folks. Yeah, yes,

0:02:05.400 --> 0:02:07.320
<v Speaker 1>I have caffeine in the mornings, but I can't have

0:02:07.440 --> 0:02:10.080
<v Speaker 1>any really after lunch or interference with my sleep. I'm

0:02:10.120 --> 0:02:13.519
<v Speaker 1>at that age where sleep is not necessarily a given.

0:02:13.919 --> 0:02:14.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Same.

0:02:14.480 --> 0:02:16.720
<v Speaker 3>I used to drink coffee all day long. I like

0:02:16.760 --> 0:02:18.320
<v Speaker 3>didn't drink water in college.

0:02:19.200 --> 0:02:21.600
<v Speaker 1>That doesn't sound like a good idea.

0:02:21.800 --> 0:02:23.560
<v Speaker 3>You know, I got a lot done, I got a

0:02:23.560 --> 0:02:25.640
<v Speaker 3>whole lot done, but I could still fall asleep. But

0:02:25.680 --> 0:02:27.920
<v Speaker 3>now I also if it's after lunch, forget it. I

0:02:27.960 --> 0:02:29.280
<v Speaker 3>can't have coffee anymore either.

0:02:29.480 --> 0:02:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Remember, folks, this is not a health podcast. Do not

0:02:32.080 --> 0:02:32.880
<v Speaker 1>take our advice.

0:02:34.000 --> 0:02:37.200
<v Speaker 3>Noah, no, please don't don't follow our lead. When you

0:02:37.200 --> 0:02:39.680
<v Speaker 3>were a kid, did you ever try jolts?

0:02:39.840 --> 0:02:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Jolt was the kind of thing that was so forbidden

0:02:42.720 --> 0:02:45.800
<v Speaker 1>in my family. Like my mom was very controlling about

0:02:45.800 --> 0:02:47.520
<v Speaker 1>the kind of food we could eat, you know, she

0:02:47.600 --> 0:02:50.160
<v Speaker 1>like counted potato chips, this kind of thing, So junk

0:02:50.200 --> 0:02:52.840
<v Speaker 1>food definitely off of this jolt. She saw that as

0:02:52.880 --> 0:02:55.080
<v Speaker 1>like battery acid, Like there was no way she would

0:02:55.080 --> 0:02:57.040
<v Speaker 1>allow us. Did you try jolts?

0:02:57.880 --> 0:02:59.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? Do you remember pixie stick?

0:03:00.360 --> 0:03:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:03:01.200 --> 0:03:03.680
<v Speaker 3>So there used to be like a megapixie stick. It

0:03:03.680 --> 0:03:06.120
<v Speaker 3>was like a giant plastic tube like the thickness of

0:03:06.120 --> 0:03:07.919
<v Speaker 3>my thumb, and it was just filled with.

0:03:07.800 --> 0:03:09.280
<v Speaker 2>Sugar and food coloring.

0:03:09.840 --> 0:03:12.040
<v Speaker 3>And we had like a party once where we just

0:03:12.080 --> 0:03:14.400
<v Speaker 3>like had those pixie sticks with jolts.

0:03:16.120 --> 0:03:17.880
<v Speaker 2>And I got pretty sick.

0:03:18.200 --> 0:03:21.240
<v Speaker 3>And jolts made me feel horrible the way too much

0:03:21.240 --> 0:03:22.360
<v Speaker 3>caffeine makes me feel now.

0:03:22.400 --> 0:03:23.760
<v Speaker 2>But I tried it once, and it was one thing

0:03:23.800 --> 0:03:24.400
<v Speaker 2>as a kid.

0:03:24.240 --> 0:03:27.160
<v Speaker 3>Where I was like, I shouldn't do that again. Anyway,

0:03:27.200 --> 0:03:27.919
<v Speaker 3>I had a lot more fun.

0:03:27.919 --> 0:03:30.200
<v Speaker 1>It sounds like it does sound like you had more fun,

0:03:30.240 --> 0:03:32.359
<v Speaker 1>but you also got sick. But I have a basic

0:03:32.400 --> 0:03:35.320
<v Speaker 1>biology question for you about caffeine. I mean, I understand

0:03:35.400 --> 0:03:38.640
<v Speaker 1>if you eat a pixie stick, it's sugar. Sugar has energy.

0:03:38.840 --> 0:03:41.480
<v Speaker 1>You could potentially get high and a rush and feel

0:03:41.600 --> 0:03:44.800
<v Speaker 1>energetic from that. But caffeine, how does that give me

0:03:44.920 --> 0:03:47.720
<v Speaker 1>energy or make me alert? Is it really energy from

0:03:47.720 --> 0:03:50.280
<v Speaker 1>the caffeine that my body's using. Is it releasing some

0:03:50.480 --> 0:03:53.000
<v Speaker 1>energy stores in my body? Or is it some much

0:03:53.040 --> 0:03:57.000
<v Speaker 1>more complicated neuro answer, dot dot dot. It depends.

0:03:57.440 --> 0:03:59.640
<v Speaker 2>Probably, it depends. I don't actually know.

0:03:59.680 --> 0:04:01.760
<v Speaker 3>I didn't prepare the answer for that coming in here.

0:04:01.840 --> 0:04:04.240
<v Speaker 3>I believe it binds to certain receptors in your brain.

0:04:04.680 --> 0:04:06.760
<v Speaker 3>My job in college was barista. I worked at like

0:04:06.800 --> 0:04:09.000
<v Speaker 3>four different coffee shops, and so I've had like shirts

0:04:09.000 --> 0:04:11.800
<v Speaker 3>with the caffeine molecule on the front. So yeah, I

0:04:11.800 --> 0:04:13.920
<v Speaker 3>think it binds with some receptors in your brain. And

0:04:13.960 --> 0:04:15.920
<v Speaker 3>I don't know how that results in you feeling awake,

0:04:16.000 --> 0:04:17.080
<v Speaker 3>but it works.

0:04:17.240 --> 0:04:19.000
<v Speaker 1>It pulls on some levers and ropes of the Rube

0:04:19.000 --> 0:04:20.559
<v Speaker 1>Goldberg machine that is my mind.

0:04:21.480 --> 0:04:23.560
<v Speaker 3>That's right, that's right, and thank God for it. I

0:04:23.600 --> 0:04:25.520
<v Speaker 3>don't know how I would have gotten through college without it.

0:04:25.760 --> 0:04:27.800
<v Speaker 3>At some point I was working at a coffee shop

0:04:27.800 --> 0:04:31.240
<v Speaker 3>because I couldn't afford all the coffee I wanted to drink,

0:04:31.240 --> 0:04:32.760
<v Speaker 3>but if I worked at the coffee shop, I could

0:04:32.760 --> 0:04:35.400
<v Speaker 3>afford it and pay my rent. So anyway, I had

0:04:35.400 --> 0:04:37.280
<v Speaker 3>a problem maybe, but I also had fun.

0:04:37.480 --> 0:04:40.279
<v Speaker 1>Well. Energy is a really fun topic because it's something

0:04:40.320 --> 0:04:42.160
<v Speaker 1>that is colloquial and we talk about it in our

0:04:42.200 --> 0:04:44.520
<v Speaker 1>lives and whether you feel energetic and whether you drink

0:04:44.520 --> 0:04:47.600
<v Speaker 1>caffeine whatever, And it's also something deeply important to physics

0:04:47.640 --> 0:04:50.200
<v Speaker 1>and the universe. So it's one of these topics that

0:04:50.240 --> 0:04:53.839
<v Speaker 1>people have like a personal feeling about, like where energy is,

0:04:53.880 --> 0:04:56.280
<v Speaker 1>where it comes from, and what it means. And it's

0:04:56.279 --> 0:04:59.880
<v Speaker 1>also really pervasive in popular science. You know, equals MC squared,

0:05:00.320 --> 0:05:02.400
<v Speaker 1>energy is mass. People tell us there's a lot of

0:05:02.440 --> 0:05:05.520
<v Speaker 1>nonsense out there about energy. So I thought it'd be

0:05:05.560 --> 0:05:07.560
<v Speaker 1>good to have an episode where we dig into some

0:05:07.640 --> 0:05:10.440
<v Speaker 1>details about what energy is and where it comes from

0:05:10.480 --> 0:05:12.680
<v Speaker 1>and what we know and don't know about it.

0:05:12.960 --> 0:05:14.880
<v Speaker 3>Yes, and you always do a great job of getting

0:05:14.920 --> 0:05:17.280
<v Speaker 3>us back on tracks. That was fantastic, and the other

0:05:17.400 --> 0:05:20.240
<v Speaker 3>people who keep us on track are our amazing audience,

0:05:20.600 --> 0:05:23.800
<v Speaker 3>and so we asked them where does energy come from?

0:05:23.800 --> 0:05:25.479
<v Speaker 3>And if you want to answer questions for us, you

0:05:25.480 --> 0:05:28.200
<v Speaker 3>can write us at questions at Daniel and Kelly dot org.

0:05:28.400 --> 0:05:30.760
<v Speaker 3>But let's go ahead and here from our audience, where

0:05:30.960 --> 0:05:32.400
<v Speaker 3>does energy come from?

0:05:32.760 --> 0:05:36.839
<v Speaker 1>Energy comes from heat, which comes from photon. I have

0:05:36.960 --> 0:05:37.720
<v Speaker 1>no idea.

0:05:37.880 --> 0:05:41.960
<v Speaker 4>Is it a mathematical trick, is it just an accounting system?

0:05:42.680 --> 0:05:46.760
<v Speaker 1>Who else? Nobody knows where energy comes from, and nobody's

0:05:46.760 --> 0:05:50.040
<v Speaker 1>ever gonna know. It is the magic of the universe.

0:05:50.600 --> 0:05:54.200
<v Speaker 5>I don't think energy comes from anyway, because you can't

0:05:54.960 --> 0:05:56.200
<v Speaker 5>have not energy.

0:05:56.839 --> 0:05:59.279
<v Speaker 1>Well, it comes from fields that permeate the entire universe.

0:06:00.680 --> 0:06:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Energy comes from hydrogen fusion caused by gravity, So I'd

0:06:04.120 --> 0:06:05.120
<v Speaker 1>have to say gravity.

0:06:05.480 --> 0:06:07.720
<v Speaker 4>Yes, it comes from the Big Bang and has just

0:06:07.800 --> 0:06:12.760
<v Speaker 4>been circulating in different forms ever since. Or powered Now,

0:06:12.760 --> 0:06:15.320
<v Speaker 4>if you're talking about the energy that powered the Big Bang,

0:06:15.440 --> 0:06:18.320
<v Speaker 4>or energy required to keep all the quantum fuels fluctuating

0:06:18.360 --> 0:06:21.440
<v Speaker 4>and alive, I imagine a physicist is better suited to

0:06:21.520 --> 0:06:22.280
<v Speaker 4>provide insight.

0:06:22.680 --> 0:06:26.800
<v Speaker 1>Hint, hint, So I guess that MLGS comes from symmetries

0:06:26.920 --> 0:06:30.520
<v Speaker 1>in nature. Obviously the Big Bang has a big role

0:06:30.560 --> 0:06:33.359
<v Speaker 1>in it, but it might not be the whole thought.

0:06:34.040 --> 0:06:40.159
<v Speaker 6>Since you can't create energy, I assume it originates from

0:06:40.160 --> 0:06:44.440
<v Speaker 6>the Big Bang, and before then who knows.

0:06:44.600 --> 0:06:45.960
<v Speaker 1>I guess it's always better around.

0:06:46.000 --> 0:06:48.159
<v Speaker 6>It just changes form after form.

0:06:48.600 --> 0:06:53.200
<v Speaker 1>Perhaps what we're calling space time is actually energy. Oh well,

0:06:53.240 --> 0:06:59.120
<v Speaker 1>I really am stumped by this one. I really don't know.

0:07:00.279 --> 0:07:03.320
<v Speaker 1>All the energy in the universe today came from the

0:07:03.360 --> 0:07:06.000
<v Speaker 1>storehouse of energy released in the Big Bang.

0:07:06.400 --> 0:07:09.640
<v Speaker 5>Some energy comes from the Big Bang, and some comes

0:07:09.640 --> 0:07:13.960
<v Speaker 5>from dark energy, but most energy in this universe comes

0:07:14.000 --> 0:07:15.720
<v Speaker 5>from eating your waities.

0:07:16.280 --> 0:07:19.400
<v Speaker 6>Have we not always had the same amount of energy?

0:07:19.760 --> 0:07:22.640
<v Speaker 5>I would say all energy originated from the Big Bang

0:07:22.720 --> 0:07:26.400
<v Speaker 5>and everything since then it's just been conversions of different forms.

0:07:26.840 --> 0:07:29.240
<v Speaker 5>But then you can ask where did that come from?

0:07:29.320 --> 0:07:31.040
<v Speaker 5>And where does dark energy come from?

0:07:31.080 --> 0:07:36.360
<v Speaker 1>And I don't know. There's some really philosophical answers in here,

0:07:36.400 --> 0:07:37.840
<v Speaker 1>and I loved listening to these.

0:07:38.240 --> 0:07:39.760
<v Speaker 2>Well, I mean, that's what I've come to expect from

0:07:39.760 --> 0:07:40.160
<v Speaker 2>the audience.

0:07:40.200 --> 0:07:43.640
<v Speaker 3>It's like always a nice combination of like philosophical some

0:07:43.680 --> 0:07:45.840
<v Speaker 3>people who get like exactly the right answer or get

0:07:45.880 --> 0:07:48.320
<v Speaker 3>really close, and then some people who know they don't

0:07:48.320 --> 0:07:48.920
<v Speaker 3>know and so they.

0:07:48.920 --> 0:07:50.520
<v Speaker 2>Just go all in on being hilarious.

0:07:50.760 --> 0:07:52.640
<v Speaker 3>I always love listening to the answers.

0:07:53.040 --> 0:07:56.080
<v Speaker 1>This comment that you can't have not energy, I had

0:07:56.080 --> 0:07:57.680
<v Speaker 1>to pause that and think about it for a while.

0:07:57.680 --> 0:07:59.720
<v Speaker 1>I was like, Wow, that sounds really profound, but I'm

0:07:59.760 --> 0:08:01.360
<v Speaker 1>not even share what it means.

0:08:01.880 --> 0:08:05.600
<v Speaker 3>Like a lot of philosophy, I thought that they were

0:08:05.600 --> 0:08:08.960
<v Speaker 3>trying to say, if there wasn't energy, none of us

0:08:08.960 --> 0:08:12.000
<v Speaker 3>would be here, which doesn't really the answer the question

0:08:12.040 --> 0:08:14.200
<v Speaker 3>where it comes from, but just something had to have

0:08:14.240 --> 0:08:14.960
<v Speaker 3>made it exist.

0:08:15.280 --> 0:08:16.160
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, what do you think?

0:08:16.560 --> 0:08:19.760
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know? Yeah, what is not energy? Is that

0:08:20.000 --> 0:08:23.240
<v Speaker 1>energy equals zero. It's true, you can't have zero energy

0:08:23.280 --> 0:08:27.400
<v Speaker 1>in the universe because of quantum mechanics. Yeah, fascinating, Yeah,

0:08:27.440 --> 0:08:30.200
<v Speaker 1>really fun answers here and a lot of assumptions. You

0:08:30.280 --> 0:08:34.560
<v Speaker 1>hear that energy doesn't come from anywhere because we've had

0:08:34.559 --> 0:08:37.720
<v Speaker 1>the same amount the whole time. Because people have this

0:08:37.800 --> 0:08:40.319
<v Speaker 1>conception which we're going to take apart and debunk a

0:08:40.360 --> 0:08:43.600
<v Speaker 1>little bit, that energy is conserved. The energy has to

0:08:43.640 --> 0:08:47.400
<v Speaker 1>come from somewhere because you can either create nor destroy it,

0:08:47.440 --> 0:08:49.040
<v Speaker 1>and therefore it can only flow.

0:08:49.600 --> 0:08:51.440
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, when I was looking through your outline and

0:08:51.480 --> 0:08:53.720
<v Speaker 3>I saw energy is not conserved, I was like, what,

0:08:55.280 --> 0:08:57.880
<v Speaker 3>I'm sure I've heard that a lot of times, and so,

0:08:58.200 --> 0:08:59.600
<v Speaker 3>you know, I think a lot of us are looking

0:08:59.640 --> 0:09:03.959
<v Speaker 3>forward to having our preconceptions about energy sort of cleared up.

0:09:04.280 --> 0:09:08.679
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly. But before we get into the mind blowing

0:09:08.760 --> 0:09:11.480
<v Speaker 1>revelations about the nature of energy, we have to be

0:09:11.559 --> 0:09:15.360
<v Speaker 1>clear and careful about what is it we're talking about anyway.

0:09:15.960 --> 0:09:18.240
<v Speaker 1>Are we talking about how the earth keeps warm? Are

0:09:18.240 --> 0:09:20.600
<v Speaker 1>we talking about what happens when you eat your wheaties?

0:09:20.920 --> 0:09:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Are we talking about philosophical revelations about the fundamental nature

0:09:24.200 --> 0:09:26.480
<v Speaker 1>of the universe. So the first thing we have to do,

0:09:26.520 --> 0:09:29.320
<v Speaker 1>of course, is define what do we mean when we

0:09:29.400 --> 0:09:30.320
<v Speaker 1>say energy.

0:09:30.800 --> 0:09:34.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so as a biologist, I'm thinking ATP, I'm thinking

0:09:34.400 --> 0:09:37.000
<v Speaker 3>at it at a chemistry level. We're as a physicist.

0:09:37.480 --> 0:09:39.880
<v Speaker 3>Do you think about it like that as well? Or

0:09:39.920 --> 0:09:41.760
<v Speaker 3>this is just a totally different topic.

0:09:42.640 --> 0:09:45.439
<v Speaker 1>Now ATP is like a chemical store of energy, so

0:09:45.480 --> 0:09:49.160
<v Speaker 1>it's completely related to the topic at hand. But it's

0:09:49.160 --> 0:09:52.680
<v Speaker 1>an example, right. It's like if somebody says to you, hey,

0:09:52.720 --> 0:09:55.040
<v Speaker 1>what is a vegetable and you're like, an implant is

0:09:55.040 --> 0:09:57.280
<v Speaker 1>a vegetable, And you're like, yeah, that's true, but what

0:09:57.400 --> 0:09:59.280
<v Speaker 1>makes it vegetable? Why do we have them? Where do

0:09:59.400 --> 0:10:02.520
<v Speaker 1>vegetables come from? Right? Showing you an a plant doesn't

0:10:02.520 --> 0:10:03.360
<v Speaker 1>answer that question.

0:10:03.720 --> 0:10:05.240
<v Speaker 3>Right, and then I'll go on a long rant about

0:10:05.280 --> 0:10:08.240
<v Speaker 3>how vegetables not a phylogenetic category and it's something humans

0:10:08.280 --> 0:10:10.320
<v Speaker 3>made up, and so anyway, go ahead.

0:10:10.360 --> 0:10:13.640
<v Speaker 1>Oh my gosh, wow, oh I love when we accidentally

0:10:13.720 --> 0:10:16.760
<v Speaker 1>stumble up upon a hidden Kelly rant. Love that. Wow.

0:10:16.880 --> 0:10:21.560
<v Speaker 3>Okay, let's go deeper, hurt, but not on vegetables. So

0:10:21.600 --> 0:10:23.680
<v Speaker 3>what is energy? How does a physicist start to answer

0:10:23.720 --> 0:10:24.200
<v Speaker 3>this question?

0:10:24.559 --> 0:10:26.720
<v Speaker 1>I like to answer this question by pointing out that

0:10:26.800 --> 0:10:29.360
<v Speaker 1>we can invent any kind of concept. I mean, you

0:10:29.400 --> 0:10:31.720
<v Speaker 1>can just make up a word called it, you know,

0:10:32.200 --> 0:10:36.560
<v Speaker 1>bliblyon or whatever, and then define it and it could

0:10:36.600 --> 0:10:39.080
<v Speaker 1>be a thing. And the question is like, does that

0:10:39.120 --> 0:10:41.760
<v Speaker 1>reveal anything about the universe? Is it related to the

0:10:41.760 --> 0:10:44.920
<v Speaker 1>physical universe in some insightful way, or is it just

0:10:45.000 --> 0:10:47.440
<v Speaker 1>some nonsense that you made up? And so, from that

0:10:47.480 --> 0:10:50.040
<v Speaker 1>point of view, like everything in physics is something we

0:10:50.160 --> 0:10:51.920
<v Speaker 1>made up, and a lot of it is just nonsense

0:10:51.960 --> 0:10:54.160
<v Speaker 1>we then ignore because it wasn't useful. And some of

0:10:54.200 --> 0:10:56.960
<v Speaker 1>it actually seems to reflect something that's happening in the

0:10:57.080 --> 0:10:59.840
<v Speaker 1>universe and is therefore useful, and we think maybe in

0:11:00.000 --> 0:11:03.880
<v Speaker 1>delightful about the fundamental nature of reality. Right, And so

0:11:04.200 --> 0:11:06.679
<v Speaker 1>energy is that way. It is something we invented. It's

0:11:06.720 --> 0:11:09.320
<v Speaker 1>just like a concept we came up with. We talked

0:11:09.400 --> 0:11:12.080
<v Speaker 1>recently on the podcast about entropy and the history of

0:11:12.200 --> 0:11:17.040
<v Speaker 1>energy is similar predates entropy because entropy was defined as

0:11:17.240 --> 0:11:21.160
<v Speaker 1>moving of energy the een and entropy comes from energy.

0:11:21.559 --> 0:11:23.240
<v Speaker 1>But this is something people have been wondering about it

0:11:23.280 --> 0:11:24.560
<v Speaker 1>for a long time, like how do you get a

0:11:24.559 --> 0:11:26.840
<v Speaker 1>machine to work? And what's going on with heat a temperature?

0:11:27.480 --> 0:11:30.560
<v Speaker 1>And so people came up with this concept of energy

0:11:30.880 --> 0:11:33.440
<v Speaker 1>one hundreds of years ago. It was actually leading It's

0:11:33.520 --> 0:11:38.760
<v Speaker 1>first identified energy of motion, like things in motion have energy,

0:11:39.240 --> 0:11:42.679
<v Speaker 1>and he called it this visviva, this living force, just

0:11:43.040 --> 0:11:45.000
<v Speaker 1>energy of motion. He recognized that.

0:11:44.880 --> 0:11:48.240
<v Speaker 3>That was like a thing, but like an asteroid hurtling

0:11:48.280 --> 0:11:50.800
<v Speaker 3>towards the Earth would have energy. But in what way

0:11:50.840 --> 0:11:53.640
<v Speaker 3>is that a living force? Was he like specifically thinking

0:11:53.640 --> 0:11:54.640
<v Speaker 3>about living organism.

0:11:54.880 --> 0:11:57.920
<v Speaker 1>No, he was just thinking about animation, not necessarily like

0:11:58.200 --> 0:12:01.600
<v Speaker 1>something is alive, but in motion. And so I think

0:12:01.600 --> 0:12:03.640
<v Speaker 1>he was thinking more about the motion than the actual

0:12:03.920 --> 0:12:06.480
<v Speaker 1>life force or the definition of life in some sort

0:12:06.480 --> 0:12:10.080
<v Speaker 1>of biological way. But that's something we still recognize, right.

0:12:10.080 --> 0:12:13.320
<v Speaker 1>We call that kinetic energy today and kinetic energy is

0:12:13.320 --> 0:12:16.679
<v Speaker 1>definitely a form of energy, like photons have energy, right,

0:12:16.720 --> 0:12:19.400
<v Speaker 1>they zoom around the universe. They're moving really really fast,

0:12:19.800 --> 0:12:22.240
<v Speaker 1>So it's a type of energy. But again, this is

0:12:22.320 --> 0:12:24.680
<v Speaker 1>like quoting the eggplant, right, it's not a definition of

0:12:24.720 --> 0:12:26.920
<v Speaker 1>the concept. It's an example of the kind of thing,

0:12:26.920 --> 0:12:30.679
<v Speaker 1>and it comes from history. And something that's especially fascinating

0:12:30.720 --> 0:12:34.360
<v Speaker 1>and revealing about kinetic energy is that it's not conserved. Right.

0:12:34.679 --> 0:12:37.520
<v Speaker 1>For example, you throw a ball up into the air,

0:12:38.240 --> 0:12:40.800
<v Speaker 1>it slows down, right because of gravity. If you throw

0:12:40.800 --> 0:12:43.400
<v Speaker 1>it straight up, it slows down, and eventually, when it

0:12:43.440 --> 0:12:46.480
<v Speaker 1>reaches the top of its arc, its stopped. So kinetic

0:12:46.600 --> 0:12:49.160
<v Speaker 1>energy on its own is not something that's conserved in

0:12:49.200 --> 0:12:51.880
<v Speaker 1>the universe, Like the universe doesn't seem to have a

0:12:51.880 --> 0:12:55.320
<v Speaker 1>special relationship with kinetic energy. It's the way you could

0:12:55.360 --> 0:12:58.000
<v Speaker 1>make up any other thing, like, hey, how many ice

0:12:58.000 --> 0:13:01.319
<v Speaker 1>cream cones are there currently in the universe. That's a

0:13:01.400 --> 0:13:04.400
<v Speaker 1>number that we don't expect to stay constant. Right, I

0:13:04.480 --> 0:13:07.200
<v Speaker 1>eat one, it's gone. I've decreased the number. I make one,

0:13:07.360 --> 0:13:10.320
<v Speaker 1>it goes up. Kelly makes five thousand ice cream cones,

0:13:10.360 --> 0:13:12.920
<v Speaker 1>it goes up a lot. Right, It's not anything meaningful

0:13:13.200 --> 0:13:16.320
<v Speaker 1>or specific and kinetic energy is sort of the same way.

0:13:16.400 --> 0:13:19.079
<v Speaker 1>Like when the ball gets thrown up into the air,

0:13:19.160 --> 0:13:24.040
<v Speaker 1>it loses that kinetic energy. Where does the kinetic energy go. Well,

0:13:24.679 --> 0:13:27.280
<v Speaker 1>energy can just go up and down. In this case,

0:13:27.320 --> 0:13:30.520
<v Speaker 1>we know it actually transforms into another kind of energy

0:13:30.520 --> 0:13:34.880
<v Speaker 1>we call potential energy, because now that ball has gained altitude,

0:13:34.960 --> 0:13:37.920
<v Speaker 1>which means it's moved up in the gravitational field, and

0:13:37.960 --> 0:13:41.240
<v Speaker 1>so it's imbued now with something we call potential energy.

0:13:41.880 --> 0:13:44.640
<v Speaker 1>And so now we have two kinds of energy kinetic energy,

0:13:44.760 --> 0:13:47.960
<v Speaker 1>energy of motion, and potential energy, which is energy of

0:13:48.040 --> 0:13:49.600
<v Speaker 1>position or arrangement.

0:13:50.080 --> 0:13:53.959
<v Speaker 3>Okay, do all different kinds of energy have the same units?

0:13:54.360 --> 0:13:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Yes?

0:13:54.800 --> 0:13:57.760
<v Speaker 2>Units, help me think about scientific phenomena.

0:13:58.240 --> 0:14:00.440
<v Speaker 1>Yes, all energy has the same unit. So you can

0:14:00.559 --> 0:14:03.480
<v Speaker 1>use jewels, for example, as a unit of energy, and

0:14:03.600 --> 0:14:06.280
<v Speaker 1>kinetic energy can be calculated in jewels, and potential energy

0:14:06.320 --> 0:14:09.280
<v Speaker 1>also calculated in jewels, and you can go back and forth. Right,

0:14:09.280 --> 0:14:11.600
<v Speaker 1>if you're standing on the top of a building, you

0:14:11.600 --> 0:14:13.640
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of potential energy because you're high up,

0:14:13.679 --> 0:14:16.200
<v Speaker 1>you have a lot of altitude, and you jump off

0:14:16.200 --> 0:14:19.440
<v Speaker 1>that building. You turn that potential energy into kinetic energy

0:14:19.480 --> 0:14:20.960
<v Speaker 1>because by the time you get to the bottom of

0:14:20.960 --> 0:14:23.360
<v Speaker 1>the building. You no longer have the altitude, so you

0:14:23.360 --> 0:14:26.320
<v Speaker 1>have no potential energy, and you have a lot of velocity. Right,

0:14:26.560 --> 0:14:30.040
<v Speaker 1>So you've turned potential energy into kinetic energy. And you

0:14:30.120 --> 0:14:31.520
<v Speaker 1>roll a ball up a hill, or you throw a

0:14:31.520 --> 0:14:34.800
<v Speaker 1>ball up in the air, kinetic energy turns into potential energy.

0:14:35.320 --> 0:14:37.760
<v Speaker 1>And the same thing is true for example, like a spring.

0:14:38.160 --> 0:14:41.120
<v Speaker 1>A spring is a way to store potential energy. And

0:14:41.240 --> 0:14:42.960
<v Speaker 1>if you push on a spring and then you let

0:14:42.960 --> 0:14:45.160
<v Speaker 1>it go, it will oscillate back and forth and back

0:14:45.200 --> 0:14:48.000
<v Speaker 1>and forth. And what's happening there is it's slashing kinetic

0:14:48.160 --> 0:14:51.840
<v Speaker 1>energy into potential energy, back into kinetic energy, back into

0:14:51.880 --> 0:14:54.920
<v Speaker 1>potential energy. So you know, like a simple model of

0:14:55.040 --> 0:14:58.360
<v Speaker 1>you have a block of stone on a spring, it'll

0:14:58.360 --> 0:15:00.840
<v Speaker 1>just sit there oscillating back and forth if there's no friction,

0:15:01.320 --> 0:15:04.040
<v Speaker 1>turning kinetic and potential energy back and forth into each other.

0:15:04.400 --> 0:15:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Which is also a really helpful way of thinking about

0:15:06.760 --> 0:15:10.600
<v Speaker 1>waves in general. Like whenever we're talking about fields oscillating,

0:15:10.640 --> 0:15:13.560
<v Speaker 1>even quantum fields, that's what's happening is that they're sloshing

0:15:13.600 --> 0:15:17.240
<v Speaker 1>back and forth between different kinds of energy. And so

0:15:18.000 --> 0:15:20.760
<v Speaker 1>now we go from having just kinetic energy energy of

0:15:20.760 --> 0:15:22.760
<v Speaker 1>motion to having two kinds of energy, which, if there's

0:15:22.800 --> 0:15:26.640
<v Speaker 1>no friction, do appear to conserve the total energy. So

0:15:26.720 --> 0:15:30.400
<v Speaker 1>kinetic energy not conserved, potential energy not conserved, but their

0:15:30.440 --> 0:15:34.200
<v Speaker 1>combination in simple systems with no friction or irresistance or

0:15:34.200 --> 0:15:37.600
<v Speaker 1>anything does seem to be conserved, which suggests that it's

0:15:37.640 --> 0:15:40.400
<v Speaker 1>like something may be more important to the universe.

0:15:40.960 --> 0:15:42.960
<v Speaker 3>Okay, all right, So for the examples that we've talked

0:15:43.000 --> 0:15:46.080
<v Speaker 3>about so far, you've got like a ball rolling down

0:15:46.120 --> 0:15:48.320
<v Speaker 3>a hill, or a ball being thrown up in the

0:15:48.360 --> 0:15:51.000
<v Speaker 3>air or something that it seems like the energy for

0:15:51.120 --> 0:15:53.920
<v Speaker 3>those activities came from the energy of the person who's

0:15:54.640 --> 0:15:58.120
<v Speaker 3>making it happen. Is that an okay way to think

0:15:58.160 --> 0:16:00.600
<v Speaker 3>about it? Both of those examples seem the energy is

0:16:00.640 --> 0:16:02.560
<v Speaker 3>coming from the person who set the ball in motion.

0:16:03.200 --> 0:16:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Or carried it originally to the top of the building

0:16:04.920 --> 0:16:05.360
<v Speaker 1>and dropped it.

0:16:05.440 --> 0:16:07.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, right, right, Okay, so we haven't really gotten to

0:16:07.560 --> 0:16:10.520
<v Speaker 3>where energy came from because energy seems like it's coming

0:16:10.560 --> 0:16:11.720
<v Speaker 3>from the person who started it.

0:16:11.880 --> 0:16:13.200
<v Speaker 2>Is that a fair way to think about it?

0:16:13.440 --> 0:16:15.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? I think that's fair. And there's something cool you

0:16:15.840 --> 0:16:17.680
<v Speaker 1>can do there, which is sort of trace the path

0:16:17.720 --> 0:16:21.280
<v Speaker 1>of the energy. Right, Like say the person threw the

0:16:21.280 --> 0:16:24.120
<v Speaker 1>ball into the air, So you're right, it has potential

0:16:24.200 --> 0:16:27.000
<v Speaker 1>energy which came from its kinetic energy, which came from

0:16:27.000 --> 0:16:31.080
<v Speaker 1>the energy stored in that person's muscles, right, which converted

0:16:31.080 --> 0:16:34.000
<v Speaker 1>some sort of chemical energy storage into the contraction of

0:16:34.040 --> 0:16:37.400
<v Speaker 1>those muscle cells, which accelerated the ball. And that chemical

0:16:37.480 --> 0:16:41.320
<v Speaker 1>energy storage came from something that person ate, right. And

0:16:41.360 --> 0:16:44.040
<v Speaker 1>that thing the person ate probably grew and maybe it

0:16:44.040 --> 0:16:46.040
<v Speaker 1>was an animal and ate plants, or maybe it was

0:16:46.080 --> 0:16:50.360
<v Speaker 1>a plant directly and that grew somehow by drinking light

0:16:50.480 --> 0:16:52.520
<v Speaker 1>from the sun. Right. And so you can play this

0:16:52.560 --> 0:16:54.560
<v Speaker 1>game where you trace the energy back, and one of

0:16:54.560 --> 0:16:57.160
<v Speaker 1>our listeners commented that a lot of the energy on

0:16:57.200 --> 0:17:00.200
<v Speaker 1>Earth seems to come from the sun, which is true, right,

0:17:00.240 --> 0:17:02.440
<v Speaker 1>There's like a little bit of a source of energy

0:17:02.440 --> 0:17:05.359
<v Speaker 1>from inside the Earth, but most of the energy does

0:17:05.440 --> 0:17:08.919
<v Speaker 1>come from the Sun. And playing this game tracing the

0:17:09.040 --> 0:17:11.840
<v Speaker 1>energy back has inside of it an implicit assumption that

0:17:11.920 --> 0:17:14.240
<v Speaker 1>you can trace energy because again, it has to come

0:17:14.280 --> 0:17:17.919
<v Speaker 1>from somewhere because it's conserved. It doesn't just disappear and

0:17:17.960 --> 0:17:20.919
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't appear. And again I'm not saying that energy

0:17:21.040 --> 0:17:23.679
<v Speaker 1>is conserved. I'm saying that if energy were conserved, then

0:17:23.720 --> 0:17:26.400
<v Speaker 1>you can play this game, which is really fascinating because

0:17:26.400 --> 0:17:28.400
<v Speaker 1>it allows you to like, you know, sort of rewind

0:17:28.400 --> 0:17:31.000
<v Speaker 1>the accounting of the universe, and it is kind of

0:17:31.000 --> 0:17:33.600
<v Speaker 1>mind blowing to realize that, like, wow, almost all the

0:17:33.720 --> 0:17:37.040
<v Speaker 1>energy that we use here on Earth was originally created

0:17:37.160 --> 0:17:40.720
<v Speaker 1>in the sun by fusion and then gobbled up by plants.

0:17:42.119 --> 0:17:43.879
<v Speaker 3>All right, let's take a break, and when we come back,

0:17:44.040 --> 0:17:46.399
<v Speaker 3>we are going to dig into whether or not mass

0:17:46.440 --> 0:18:00.960
<v Speaker 3>could be considered a kind of energy.

0:18:04.880 --> 0:18:05.720
<v Speaker 2>All right, we're back.

0:18:05.760 --> 0:18:07.919
<v Speaker 3>So before the break, we were talking about how a

0:18:07.960 --> 0:18:10.359
<v Speaker 3>lot of energy on Earth comes from the Sun, and

0:18:10.440 --> 0:18:13.359
<v Speaker 3>so I'm thinking about you know, plants growing, putting on

0:18:13.520 --> 0:18:16.760
<v Speaker 3>mass as you know, their chloroplasts, or turning energy from

0:18:16.760 --> 0:18:18.680
<v Speaker 3>the Sun into energy for them, and then I eat

0:18:18.720 --> 0:18:21.000
<v Speaker 3>them and put on a little bit of mass, just

0:18:21.080 --> 0:18:23.720
<v Speaker 3>a little and use that energy to make a lot

0:18:23.760 --> 0:18:27.480
<v Speaker 3>of ice cream cones, which makes people very happy. Should

0:18:27.480 --> 0:18:29.520
<v Speaker 3>I think about mass as a third kind of energy.

0:18:29.880 --> 0:18:32.520
<v Speaker 1>It's tempting, right to think about mass and another kind

0:18:32.520 --> 0:18:35.399
<v Speaker 1>of energy, because we talked about stored energy, chemical energy,

0:18:35.440 --> 0:18:40.320
<v Speaker 1>and atp energy stored in protons as they get fused

0:18:40.359 --> 0:18:43.160
<v Speaker 1>together in the sun. And you hear a lot that

0:18:43.320 --> 0:18:47.000
<v Speaker 1>mass is another kind of energy. People say equals mc squared, right,

0:18:47.040 --> 0:18:50.480
<v Speaker 1>and so therefore mass is energy and energy is mass. Yeah,

0:18:50.520 --> 0:18:54.280
<v Speaker 1>so that's not really true, and the deeper answer is

0:18:54.320 --> 0:18:58.959
<v Speaker 1>that mass is just an indicator of internal stored energy.

0:19:00.040 --> 0:19:03.159
<v Speaker 1>Think about some object and you can categorize all of

0:19:03.160 --> 0:19:06.960
<v Speaker 1>its energy into two different boxes. One is the motion

0:19:07.080 --> 0:19:09.760
<v Speaker 1>of that object, like, is the whole thing moving? If so,

0:19:10.280 --> 0:19:13.919
<v Speaker 1>it's got some kinetic energy, right. Cool. The other kind

0:19:13.960 --> 0:19:17.560
<v Speaker 1>of energy you can have is internal energy, like maybe

0:19:17.600 --> 0:19:19.800
<v Speaker 1>there's a bunch of particles and they have bonds, or

0:19:19.840 --> 0:19:23.480
<v Speaker 1>there's chemistry or something. All that internal stored energy is

0:19:23.520 --> 0:19:27.720
<v Speaker 1>what we call mass. Mass is not a new form

0:19:27.840 --> 0:19:29.840
<v Speaker 1>of energy. It's not a special kind of energy on

0:19:29.920 --> 0:19:33.520
<v Speaker 1>its own. It's an indicator of how much energy is

0:19:33.600 --> 0:19:35.199
<v Speaker 1>stored inside something.

0:19:36.560 --> 0:19:40.600
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So like if you've got a big truck and

0:19:40.680 --> 0:19:44.080
<v Speaker 3>a little truck and you set both of them going

0:19:44.119 --> 0:19:46.520
<v Speaker 3>down the hill, the big truck is going to have

0:19:46.600 --> 0:19:51.680
<v Speaker 3>more energy because it has more mass, and it's an

0:19:51.720 --> 0:19:53.200
<v Speaker 3>indicator that it has more energy.

0:19:53.200 --> 0:19:55.600
<v Speaker 1>But it's yeah, exactly, if you measure the inertia of

0:19:55.640 --> 0:19:59.159
<v Speaker 1>something right by giving it a push, you give something

0:19:59.320 --> 0:20:01.840
<v Speaker 1>a certain amount of and then you measure its acceleration.

0:20:02.119 --> 0:20:05.359
<v Speaker 1>That tells you it's inertia because F equalsma. Then what

0:20:05.400 --> 0:20:08.440
<v Speaker 1>you're really measuring is how much energy is stored inside something.

0:20:08.480 --> 0:20:10.639
<v Speaker 1>And you can make this very concrete, like take a

0:20:10.720 --> 0:20:13.840
<v Speaker 1>rock that has a certain mass, shoot a photon at it.

0:20:13.960 --> 0:20:17.280
<v Speaker 1>What happens. The photon is absorbed by the rock, and

0:20:17.359 --> 0:20:20.040
<v Speaker 1>where's that energy go It like goes into the bond somehow,

0:20:20.080 --> 0:20:24.280
<v Speaker 1>it makes some rock molecule vibrate more, or if it's

0:20:24.280 --> 0:20:26.640
<v Speaker 1>a gas that you're hitting that it makes those particles

0:20:26.680 --> 0:20:28.760
<v Speaker 1>move faster. It's some sort of internal energy, right, it

0:20:28.800 --> 0:20:32.240
<v Speaker 1>doesn't matter. The mass of that rock goes up when

0:20:32.240 --> 0:20:35.040
<v Speaker 1>it eats that photon, which means like you lie in

0:20:35.080 --> 0:20:39.439
<v Speaker 1>the sun absorbing photons, your mass goes up. Or you know,

0:20:39.480 --> 0:20:41.520
<v Speaker 1>you have an electric car parked in your garage and

0:20:41.560 --> 0:20:44.199
<v Speaker 1>you've plugged it in and now you're adding energy to

0:20:44.280 --> 0:20:47.399
<v Speaker 1>the battery. Its mass is going up, right, because that

0:20:47.480 --> 0:20:50.000
<v Speaker 1>mass is an indicator of how much energy is stored

0:20:50.000 --> 0:20:54.320
<v Speaker 1>inside of whatever kind. As long as it's internal stored energy,

0:20:54.320 --> 0:20:56.720
<v Speaker 1>it contributes to the mass. So the mass is not

0:20:56.840 --> 0:20:59.600
<v Speaker 1>on its own. A new kind of energy it's just

0:20:59.640 --> 0:21:02.399
<v Speaker 1>an d cater of how much energy is stored inside

0:21:02.520 --> 0:21:06.000
<v Speaker 1>and that's what equals MC squared means. E. There doesn't

0:21:06.000 --> 0:21:08.320
<v Speaker 1>mean total energy. It's not saying that all mass is

0:21:08.440 --> 0:21:11.199
<v Speaker 1>energy and all energy is mass. E really means just

0:21:11.359 --> 0:21:15.000
<v Speaker 1>internal stored energy, and there's a fuller equation that captures

0:21:15.000 --> 0:21:18.240
<v Speaker 1>the full energy of the object as a term for

0:21:18.400 --> 0:21:21.280
<v Speaker 1>momentum as well. So it really tells you that energy

0:21:21.400 --> 0:21:25.959
<v Speaker 1>is internal stored energy as revealed by mass and another

0:21:26.080 --> 0:21:29.359
<v Speaker 1>term for energy of motion energy of momentum.

0:21:29.520 --> 0:21:33.160
<v Speaker 3>All right, so mass is just a reflection of kineticum potential.

0:21:32.800 --> 0:21:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Energy, internal stored energy, which could be kinetic or potential. Yes, absolutely.

0:21:37.560 --> 0:21:40.560
<v Speaker 3>Okay, are there other forms of energy or are they

0:21:40.640 --> 0:21:44.000
<v Speaker 3>all essentially just different versions of kinneticum potential energy?

0:21:44.720 --> 0:21:46.680
<v Speaker 1>Period It's a great question and the answer is yes.

0:21:46.720 --> 0:21:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Kineticum potential energy are the two categories of energy, and

0:21:50.560 --> 0:21:53.760
<v Speaker 1>there's nothing else. Right, So everything can be either kinetic

0:21:53.840 --> 0:21:57.200
<v Speaker 1>or potential energy. And if it's internal stored energy, it

0:21:57.200 --> 0:21:59.959
<v Speaker 1>could be kinetic or potential then we call it mass.

0:22:00.240 --> 0:22:02.280
<v Speaker 1>And if it's just motion of the whole object, then

0:22:02.280 --> 0:22:06.000
<v Speaker 1>that's kinetic energy of the whole shebang. And this helps

0:22:06.000 --> 0:22:09.080
<v Speaker 1>you understand things like, well, how can photons have energy

0:22:09.119 --> 0:22:10.680
<v Speaker 1>if they don't have mass. People write to me a

0:22:10.720 --> 0:22:13.399
<v Speaker 1>lot and say, like, photons have energy, right, Well, equals

0:22:13.400 --> 0:22:17.840
<v Speaker 1>empc square, therefore photons have mass, right, Not true, photons

0:22:17.880 --> 0:22:21.360
<v Speaker 1>don't have mass because again that equation equals empc squared.

0:22:21.560 --> 0:22:24.439
<v Speaker 1>That e is just internal stored energy. Photons have no

0:22:24.560 --> 0:22:27.760
<v Speaker 1>internal stored energy because they have no mass. But the

0:22:27.760 --> 0:22:30.480
<v Speaker 1>full equation has a term for momentum in it, and

0:22:30.480 --> 0:22:34.800
<v Speaker 1>photons definitely do have momentum, which is why photons also

0:22:34.960 --> 0:22:38.679
<v Speaker 1>have energy. So you can have energy without having any mass, right,

0:22:38.680 --> 0:22:42.399
<v Speaker 1>because photons again are pure motion energy. And then you

0:22:42.440 --> 0:22:45.480
<v Speaker 1>can play all sorts of fun games to confuse yourself

0:22:45.520 --> 0:22:48.320
<v Speaker 1>by what this means. Like, you know, take a box,

0:22:48.520 --> 0:22:51.360
<v Speaker 1>for example, and shoot a photon in it, and don't

0:22:51.400 --> 0:22:54.080
<v Speaker 1>let the photon get absorbed, put back mirrors inside the box,

0:22:54.160 --> 0:22:56.080
<v Speaker 1>the photon just bounces around. You still just have a

0:22:56.080 --> 0:22:58.720
<v Speaker 1>photon in the box. Then what you've done is you've

0:22:58.720 --> 0:23:02.560
<v Speaker 1>added to the mass of the by adding a massless photon.

0:23:02.960 --> 0:23:05.760
<v Speaker 1>People have this intuition that mass is like the amount

0:23:05.800 --> 0:23:08.240
<v Speaker 1>of stuff in something, but it really isn't. It really

0:23:08.280 --> 0:23:11.320
<v Speaker 1>just captures the internal store energy. Even if you add

0:23:11.359 --> 0:23:15.159
<v Speaker 1>massless things to your box, then you're increasing the mass

0:23:15.280 --> 0:23:17.679
<v Speaker 1>of the box. It's really kind of mind bending. It

0:23:17.720 --> 0:23:20.800
<v Speaker 1>really makes you change your understanding of what mass is.

0:23:21.440 --> 0:23:25.679
<v Speaker 3>I need more coffee, Yeah, but I'm following you. Okay,

0:23:25.680 --> 0:23:29.200
<v Speaker 3>So let's dig in more to this question about you know, when,

0:23:29.440 --> 0:23:31.720
<v Speaker 3>if ever, is energy conserved.

0:23:32.440 --> 0:23:33.080
<v Speaker 2>So you were.

0:23:33.000 --> 0:23:35.280
<v Speaker 3>Talking about throwing a ball in the air and it

0:23:35.320 --> 0:23:39.760
<v Speaker 3>goes from kinetic energy to potential energy, but it doesn't

0:23:39.800 --> 0:23:42.280
<v Speaker 3>always get conserved. Can we talk about the history of

0:23:42.320 --> 0:23:44.720
<v Speaker 3>why we used to think energy was conserved.

0:23:45.000 --> 0:23:47.879
<v Speaker 1>It's a really fascinating story. And you know, for a

0:23:47.920 --> 0:23:50.480
<v Speaker 1>long time we just sort of noticed that energy seemed

0:23:50.520 --> 0:23:53.600
<v Speaker 1>to be conserved. Like if you created a new quantity

0:23:53.760 --> 0:23:56.159
<v Speaker 1>number of ice cream sandwiches or something, and then you

0:23:56.359 --> 0:23:59.480
<v Speaker 1>notice that, weirdly, no matter what you did, the number

0:23:59.520 --> 0:24:02.919
<v Speaker 1>didn't change, Like every time Kelly ate an ice cream sandwich,

0:24:02.960 --> 0:24:06.280
<v Speaker 1>Daniel made one, there was this weird cosmic connection or

0:24:06.359 --> 0:24:09.920
<v Speaker 1>vice versa. Then you'd be like, something is going on here, right,

0:24:10.040 --> 0:24:13.639
<v Speaker 1>Like the universe respects ice cream sandwiches or something.

0:24:14.520 --> 0:24:16.040
<v Speaker 2>I want to live in that use.

0:24:17.720 --> 0:24:20.439
<v Speaker 1>And that's sort of the case for energy. That In

0:24:20.520 --> 0:24:24.240
<v Speaker 1>lots of situations that we studied, energy seems to be conserved,

0:24:24.240 --> 0:24:26.600
<v Speaker 1>and so we assumed that it was same was also

0:24:26.640 --> 0:24:29.119
<v Speaker 1>true for mass. For a long time, people assumed that

0:24:29.200 --> 0:24:31.600
<v Speaker 1>you couldn't create or destroy mass. A lot of people

0:24:31.640 --> 0:24:34.040
<v Speaker 1>still out there repeat that, even though now we know

0:24:34.160 --> 0:24:36.640
<v Speaker 1>that it's not true. We know that you can convert

0:24:36.760 --> 0:24:40.320
<v Speaker 1>mass into energy of motion or into potential energy that's

0:24:40.359 --> 0:24:42.879
<v Speaker 1>not internal. I do that all the time at my

0:24:43.040 --> 0:24:45.560
<v Speaker 1>day job. Right when we smash protons together, we are

0:24:45.560 --> 0:24:48.880
<v Speaker 1>turning their mass into new forms of energy. We're turning

0:24:48.920 --> 0:24:51.760
<v Speaker 1>their energy into mass all the time, back and forth,

0:24:52.200 --> 0:24:54.440
<v Speaker 1>and every time you absorb photons from the Sun, you're

0:24:54.480 --> 0:24:57.600
<v Speaker 1>turning their energy into mass. But that's a hard thing

0:24:57.640 --> 0:24:59.879
<v Speaker 1>to notice unless you have control a tiny part of

0:25:00.000 --> 0:25:01.920
<v Speaker 1>goals and you can see these things happen. Which is

0:25:01.960 --> 0:25:05.080
<v Speaker 1>why chemists for a long time reasonably believed that mass

0:25:05.240 --> 0:25:08.160
<v Speaker 1>was conserved, because they would measure the stuff going into

0:25:08.200 --> 0:25:10.200
<v Speaker 1>a reaction and the stuff coming out of a reaction,

0:25:10.400 --> 0:25:14.600
<v Speaker 1>and they never saw a change to within their measuring uncertainties. Now,

0:25:14.680 --> 0:25:17.040
<v Speaker 1>of course, we know that if they had measured more accurately,

0:25:17.320 --> 0:25:19.960
<v Speaker 1>they would have noticed very tiny changes in mass because

0:25:20.119 --> 0:25:22.399
<v Speaker 1>mass is very very dense stuff. Right. The C square

0:25:22.480 --> 0:25:24.359
<v Speaker 1>there tells you that a big change in energy is

0:25:24.400 --> 0:25:28.200
<v Speaker 1>required to make even a small change in the mass. Anyway,

0:25:28.240 --> 0:25:31.159
<v Speaker 1>the same thing was long true for energy. People are like, okay,

0:25:31.160 --> 0:25:33.680
<v Speaker 1>well mass is not conserved, we're going to give that up.

0:25:34.000 --> 0:25:36.399
<v Speaker 1>But energy still, Energy definitely has got to be a

0:25:36.400 --> 0:25:39.320
<v Speaker 1>conserved right, because people made all these measurements, and it

0:25:39.400 --> 0:25:41.800
<v Speaker 1>seemed like the more accurately you measured it, the more

0:25:41.840 --> 0:25:45.240
<v Speaker 1>you discovered energy had to go somewhere. So in realistic studies,

0:25:45.280 --> 0:25:47.760
<v Speaker 1>for example, say you throw that ball up into the air,

0:25:47.920 --> 0:25:50.439
<v Speaker 1>what's going to happen. Well, it's not going to convert

0:25:50.440 --> 0:25:53.000
<v Speaker 1>all of its kinetic energy into potential because some of

0:25:53.040 --> 0:25:55.520
<v Speaker 1>it's going to get lost to air resistance. Or if

0:25:55.560 --> 0:25:57.399
<v Speaker 1>you roll a ball down a hill, right, some of

0:25:57.440 --> 0:25:59.960
<v Speaker 1>it's going to get lost to friction. That energy seemed

0:25:59.960 --> 0:26:02.479
<v Speaker 1>to creep out of those systems. But as long as

0:26:02.480 --> 0:26:04.800
<v Speaker 1>you define the system to include those things, you account

0:26:04.840 --> 0:26:07.840
<v Speaker 1>for friction and you account for air resistance, you're able

0:26:07.880 --> 0:26:11.000
<v Speaker 1>to account for all of that energy. The balls flying

0:26:11.040 --> 0:26:14.000
<v Speaker 1>up into the air and it loses energy to air resistance,

0:26:14.000 --> 0:26:16.400
<v Speaker 1>but that energy then just goes into heating the air,

0:26:17.200 --> 0:26:19.160
<v Speaker 1>or if you're sliding down a hill and you feel

0:26:19.160 --> 0:26:22.400
<v Speaker 1>friction between your pants and the grass, then you're heating

0:26:22.520 --> 0:26:25.560
<v Speaker 1>up the grass and your pants. That energy is still there.

0:26:26.080 --> 0:26:28.560
<v Speaker 1>And so for a long time people just noticed, even

0:26:28.600 --> 0:26:31.240
<v Speaker 1>with more and more careful accounting, that energy did seem

0:26:31.280 --> 0:26:32.040
<v Speaker 1>to be conserved.

0:26:32.320 --> 0:26:36.280
<v Speaker 3>So I remember that we were talking about Emmy notors on.

0:26:36.480 --> 0:26:38.560
<v Speaker 3>I worked so hard to not say her name during

0:26:38.560 --> 0:26:40.879
<v Speaker 3>the episode because I knew I'd get it wrong, But

0:26:40.920 --> 0:26:42.760
<v Speaker 3>here I went and put myself in that position.

0:26:42.840 --> 0:26:44.760
<v Speaker 2>But anyway, that she had come up with a.

0:26:44.680 --> 0:26:49.320
<v Speaker 3>Really great law or theory that explained when things are

0:26:49.320 --> 0:26:52.080
<v Speaker 3>symmetrical and when they're not. And so it sounds to

0:26:52.119 --> 0:26:54.399
<v Speaker 3>me like we're going to determine here that energy is

0:26:54.440 --> 0:26:56.959
<v Speaker 3>not symmetrical, and that Emmy would tell us that if

0:26:56.960 --> 0:26:57.400
<v Speaker 3>she were here.

0:26:57.600 --> 0:26:59.919
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's really cool that we can do more than

0:27:00.240 --> 0:27:04.440
<v Speaker 1>just measure the number of ice cream sandwiches and notice

0:27:04.720 --> 0:27:07.119
<v Speaker 1>that they do or do not change and then conclude something.

0:27:07.160 --> 0:27:10.840
<v Speaker 1>It's not just empirical. We actually now have theoretical ways

0:27:11.040 --> 0:27:14.919
<v Speaker 1>to argue whether something should be conserved or not. And

0:27:14.960 --> 0:27:17.520
<v Speaker 1>as you say, that's due to Emmy Nuther whose name

0:27:17.600 --> 0:27:21.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure I'm also mispronouncing, and the number of mispronunciations

0:27:21.320 --> 0:27:23.199
<v Speaker 1>is not conserved. Like it just seems to grow, go

0:27:23.320 --> 0:27:25.120
<v Speaker 1>up and up and up every time I hear this name,

0:27:26.560 --> 0:27:30.040
<v Speaker 1>different pronunciations of it. So German listeners, please don't be

0:27:30.080 --> 0:27:32.560
<v Speaker 1>shy right in and correct our pronunciations. We want to

0:27:32.560 --> 0:27:35.520
<v Speaker 1>get this stuff right anyway. I mean, other told us

0:27:35.520 --> 0:27:37.800
<v Speaker 1>that every time we have a conservation law in the universe.

0:27:38.000 --> 0:27:41.440
<v Speaker 1>You're right, it's connected to some symmetry of the universe.

0:27:41.800 --> 0:27:43.919
<v Speaker 1>And symmetry has a sort of special meaning there. It

0:27:43.960 --> 0:27:48.640
<v Speaker 1>says that you can transform your experiment, you can move

0:27:48.680 --> 0:27:50.840
<v Speaker 1>it or rotate it in some way, and you should

0:27:50.920 --> 0:27:54.000
<v Speaker 1>get the same answer. And so a famous and powerful

0:27:54.040 --> 0:27:58.560
<v Speaker 1>example is momentum conservation. You know, alongside energy, we have

0:27:58.640 --> 0:28:02.320
<v Speaker 1>this concept of moment momentum, which is similar to energy. Right,

0:28:02.359 --> 0:28:05.200
<v Speaker 1>Momentum contributes to your energy. We said, there's internal storat

0:28:05.320 --> 0:28:08.240
<v Speaker 1>energy and then this energy of momentum which come together

0:28:08.240 --> 0:28:10.760
<v Speaker 1>to make your total energy. And the famous and important

0:28:10.760 --> 0:28:13.320
<v Speaker 1>example of that is momentum, which is something that is

0:28:13.400 --> 0:28:17.399
<v Speaker 1>actually conserved in our universe. And when we say symmetry there,

0:28:17.520 --> 0:28:20.320
<v Speaker 1>what we mean is that you can do an experiment

0:28:20.520 --> 0:28:24.479
<v Speaker 1>and then transform the experiment according to some symmetry and

0:28:24.680 --> 0:28:26.760
<v Speaker 1>do the experiment again, you should get the same answer.

0:28:27.119 --> 0:28:29.560
<v Speaker 1>So if you build a physics experiment and you do

0:28:29.640 --> 0:28:32.399
<v Speaker 1>it in space, you know, you collide billiard balls or whatever,

0:28:32.880 --> 0:28:35.000
<v Speaker 1>and then you do it ten meters to the left

0:28:35.280 --> 0:28:37.639
<v Speaker 1>or one hundred meters to the right, or forward one

0:28:37.680 --> 0:28:40.600
<v Speaker 1>thousand meters, you should get the same answer. So that's

0:28:40.640 --> 0:28:43.360
<v Speaker 1>a symmetry of the universe. The universe doesn't care where

0:28:43.400 --> 0:28:45.720
<v Speaker 1>you do your experiment. As long as you set up

0:28:45.720 --> 0:28:49.400
<v Speaker 1>the conditions the same way nearby masses or whatever, you

0:28:49.440 --> 0:28:52.680
<v Speaker 1>should get the same answer. That's a fundamental symmetry of

0:28:52.720 --> 0:28:56.520
<v Speaker 1>the universe. And that symmetry gives you conservation of momentum.

0:28:56.760 --> 0:28:59.760
<v Speaker 1>So Emmy Nuther has this amazing conceptual bridge which you

0:28:59.800 --> 0:29:04.280
<v Speaker 1>tell you what symmetry generates a conservation law. So conservation

0:29:04.400 --> 0:29:07.800
<v Speaker 1>momentum comes from this symmetry of translation, where you don't

0:29:07.840 --> 0:29:10.960
<v Speaker 1>care about where you are in space, where space is relative.

0:29:11.040 --> 0:29:14.480
<v Speaker 1>There's no like official zero, there's no like golden numbers

0:29:14.600 --> 0:29:16.880
<v Speaker 1>glowing in the universe. It doesn't matter where you do

0:29:16.960 --> 0:29:20.160
<v Speaker 1>your experiment. And so now more than just saying hey,

0:29:20.240 --> 0:29:23.040
<v Speaker 1>look I noticed, momentum is conserved. You can say why

0:29:23.080 --> 0:29:26.040
<v Speaker 1>it's conserved, and you can inspect that reason, say does

0:29:26.080 --> 0:29:28.480
<v Speaker 1>that make sense? You know, we can say momentum is

0:29:28.480 --> 0:29:32.600
<v Speaker 1>conserved because the universe has no preferred location. You can

0:29:32.640 --> 0:29:34.440
<v Speaker 1>do your experiment anywhere, and we're like, all right, that

0:29:34.480 --> 0:29:36.560
<v Speaker 1>makes sense and that's a good reason for momentum to

0:29:36.560 --> 0:29:40.640
<v Speaker 1>be conserved. Okay, So what about energy? I mean, not

0:29:40.800 --> 0:29:43.840
<v Speaker 1>there tells us that energy is conserved in the universe

0:29:44.360 --> 0:29:49.160
<v Speaker 1>if the universe's laws don't change with time. Right, So,

0:29:49.280 --> 0:29:52.960
<v Speaker 1>momentum is conserved if the universe's laws don't depend on location,

0:29:53.080 --> 0:29:54.720
<v Speaker 1>if you don't have like different laws of physics in

0:29:54.760 --> 0:29:58.520
<v Speaker 1>different places, Energy is conserved if the laws don't change

0:29:58.520 --> 0:30:01.480
<v Speaker 1>with time. If like this, the same rules of electromagnetism

0:30:01.480 --> 0:30:04.720
<v Speaker 1>applied today and tomorrow and in a thousand years.

0:30:05.080 --> 0:30:07.680
<v Speaker 3>It feels like I want that to be there. But

0:30:07.880 --> 0:30:10.480
<v Speaker 3>I think we've decided that energy is not concerved. Can

0:30:10.480 --> 0:30:12.240
<v Speaker 3>you give me an example of how it's not conserved.

0:30:12.680 --> 0:30:15.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's fascinating because we assume that the laws of

0:30:15.840 --> 0:30:18.880
<v Speaker 1>physics are constant all the time. Think about just how

0:30:18.920 --> 0:30:20.680
<v Speaker 1>simple it is to read about an experiment in a

0:30:20.760 --> 0:30:23.120
<v Speaker 1>journal and say I'm going to reproduce that experiment and

0:30:23.160 --> 0:30:25.200
<v Speaker 1>see if it's true, and I'm going to do the

0:30:25.240 --> 0:30:26.800
<v Speaker 1>same thing and see if I get the same answer,

0:30:26.840 --> 0:30:30.200
<v Speaker 1>and reproducing it later, and assuming you get the same answer,

0:30:30.320 --> 0:30:33.600
<v Speaker 1>assumes the laws of physics shouldn't change, right, And it's

0:30:33.720 --> 0:30:37.280
<v Speaker 1>really important to our whole process of science that the

0:30:37.360 --> 0:30:39.480
<v Speaker 1>laws of physics were uncovering now are the same as

0:30:39.520 --> 0:30:41.959
<v Speaker 1>they were a thousand years ago or even a billion

0:30:42.040 --> 0:30:44.680
<v Speaker 1>years ago. Like when we look at galaxies deep out

0:30:44.720 --> 0:30:47.880
<v Speaker 1>into space in early times, we assume we know what

0:30:47.920 --> 0:30:50.600
<v Speaker 1>the speed of light was back then, and how mass

0:30:50.600 --> 0:30:52.840
<v Speaker 1>worked and all this kind of stuff. So the universe

0:30:52.880 --> 0:30:55.560
<v Speaker 1>without any constant laws is very difficult the universe to

0:30:55.600 --> 0:30:59.000
<v Speaker 1>do science in, right. And so it's not true that

0:30:59.000 --> 0:31:01.360
<v Speaker 1>the laws of physics are just wially nearly changing with time.

0:31:01.440 --> 0:31:04.120
<v Speaker 1>That's not something we've seen. But there are a couple

0:31:04.320 --> 0:31:07.200
<v Speaker 1>aspects of the laws of physics which do seem to

0:31:07.240 --> 0:31:10.320
<v Speaker 1>be changing with time, and one of them is that

0:31:10.360 --> 0:31:15.120
<v Speaker 1>the universe is expanding, so space itself, the frame in

0:31:15.160 --> 0:31:17.680
<v Speaker 1>which we're doing all of this stuff, is not static.

0:31:18.400 --> 0:31:21.000
<v Speaker 1>And when Emmy Nuther says the universe laws have to

0:31:21.080 --> 0:31:24.480
<v Speaker 1>be constant in time that includes space, right, it means

0:31:24.720 --> 0:31:28.320
<v Speaker 1>space itself needs to be constant the way like conservation

0:31:28.400 --> 0:31:31.240
<v Speaker 1>momentum requires you to be the same location in space,

0:31:31.680 --> 0:31:34.560
<v Speaker 1>it's put in the context of the space in that

0:31:34.640 --> 0:31:37.720
<v Speaker 1>same way, energy conservation requires you to have basically the

0:31:37.800 --> 0:31:41.160
<v Speaker 1>same amount of space. It's not changing the laws of

0:31:41.200 --> 0:31:44.400
<v Speaker 1>electromagnetism or you know, the speed of light or anything.

0:31:44.400 --> 0:31:47.280
<v Speaker 1>It's just saying, hey, the conditions of your experiment are

0:31:47.280 --> 0:31:51.640
<v Speaker 1>not constant because your universe is expanding. And we've known

0:31:51.720 --> 0:31:54.560
<v Speaker 1>for like twenty or so years that the universe is expanding,

0:31:54.760 --> 0:31:57.959
<v Speaker 1>and not just expanding, but accelerating in its expansion, Like

0:31:58.360 --> 0:32:01.800
<v Speaker 1>every year we are making more space between galaxy clusters

0:32:02.040 --> 0:32:04.560
<v Speaker 1>and between ice cream sandwiches and everywhere in the universe.

0:32:04.880 --> 0:32:08.400
<v Speaker 1>Space is expanding. And we actually have a not so

0:32:08.520 --> 0:32:12.760
<v Speaker 1>terrible explanation for why space expanding would mean that energy

0:32:12.840 --> 0:32:13.720
<v Speaker 1>isn't conserved.

0:32:14.040 --> 0:32:28.920
<v Speaker 3>Oh, I want to hear about that after the break.

0:32:33.200 --> 0:32:34.080
<v Speaker 2>All right, we're back.

0:32:34.200 --> 0:32:36.480
<v Speaker 3>So you blew our minds a second ago by explaining

0:32:36.480 --> 0:32:39.240
<v Speaker 3>that the expanding universe is why energy can't be concerned.

0:32:39.280 --> 0:32:41.520
<v Speaker 3>It's crazy to me that something that's happening so far

0:32:41.560 --> 0:32:45.240
<v Speaker 3>away but I guess also happening everywhere is impacting my

0:32:45.400 --> 0:32:47.240
<v Speaker 3>day to day experience of energy.

0:32:47.480 --> 0:32:49.080
<v Speaker 2>But go ahead and tell us the crazy thing you.

0:32:49.120 --> 0:32:52.880
<v Speaker 1>Replaying, William, I think, well, that sounds kind of abstract, right,

0:32:52.920 --> 0:32:55.120
<v Speaker 1>Like you're telling me the universe is expanding, and so

0:32:55.240 --> 0:32:58.640
<v Speaker 1>in some sense the context of our experiments is changing.

0:32:59.240 --> 0:33:01.640
<v Speaker 1>But why does that mean that energy is not conserved?

0:33:01.680 --> 0:33:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Like is energy being created somewhere or destroyed somewhere. So

0:33:05.400 --> 0:33:08.120
<v Speaker 1>let's tack into the details there, Like energy actually is

0:33:08.240 --> 0:33:11.920
<v Speaker 1>being created by the expansion of the universe. We talk

0:33:11.960 --> 0:33:15.240
<v Speaker 1>about the expansion of space as creating more space, right,

0:33:15.240 --> 0:33:18.680
<v Speaker 1>Like the distance between us and some cluster galaxy is growing,

0:33:19.120 --> 0:33:21.840
<v Speaker 1>and not because we're applying some force to accelerate away

0:33:21.880 --> 0:33:26.280
<v Speaker 1>from them. This is just like general relativity. Space is expanding, right,

0:33:26.320 --> 0:33:29.160
<v Speaker 1>We're not measuring any acceleration. They're not measuring any acceleration

0:33:29.200 --> 0:33:33.000
<v Speaker 1>with their accelerometers. But the distance between our galaxies is

0:33:33.040 --> 0:33:36.640
<v Speaker 1>increasing and faster and faster every year. So new space

0:33:36.720 --> 0:33:39.040
<v Speaker 1>is being made. Well, what does that mean? For new

0:33:39.080 --> 0:33:42.960
<v Speaker 1>space to be made? Space is filled with quantum fields, right,

0:33:43.240 --> 0:33:46.440
<v Speaker 1>There's the electron field, there's electromagnetic field, there's fields for

0:33:46.480 --> 0:33:49.800
<v Speaker 1>all the quarks, all these fields in space, and all

0:33:49.840 --> 0:33:53.480
<v Speaker 1>those fields have non zero energy, like these are quantum fields,

0:33:53.480 --> 0:33:56.000
<v Speaker 1>which means they can never go down to total zero.

0:33:56.120 --> 0:33:59.960
<v Speaker 1>They always have some energy in them. So you pop

0:34:00.000 --> 0:34:04.000
<v Speaker 1>a new cube of space, boom, it comes with quantum

0:34:04.080 --> 0:34:07.840
<v Speaker 1>fields that have energy in them. Right, So new space

0:34:07.920 --> 0:34:12.160
<v Speaker 1>means new energy. So right there, making more space means

0:34:12.239 --> 0:34:14.600
<v Speaker 1>you're creating energy, that doesn't It just.

0:34:14.520 --> 0:34:17.560
<v Speaker 3>Mean the energy gets spread more thin across this new space.

0:34:17.680 --> 0:34:20.600
<v Speaker 1>Because every chunk of space is the same and the

0:34:20.680 --> 0:34:24.240
<v Speaker 1>rules of quantum mechanics have a minimum requirement of that energy.

0:34:24.840 --> 0:34:27.480
<v Speaker 1>It's not something we deeply understand, but it's something that's

0:34:27.520 --> 0:34:31.319
<v Speaker 1>required for the accelerated expansion of the universe. We know

0:34:31.400 --> 0:34:34.680
<v Speaker 1>that dark energy behaves this way. We see, for example,

0:34:34.719 --> 0:34:38.440
<v Speaker 1>as the universe expands, the density of dark energy doesn't

0:34:38.520 --> 0:34:42.320
<v Speaker 1>change in the universe like the density of protons goes down.

0:34:42.600 --> 0:34:44.759
<v Speaker 1>You have a certain number of protons, you know, some

0:34:44.880 --> 0:34:48.080
<v Speaker 1>huge number of protons in the universe. As the volume

0:34:48.120 --> 0:34:51.440
<v Speaker 1>of the universe increases, the density of those protons drops

0:34:51.480 --> 0:34:54.320
<v Speaker 1>exactly the way you would expect. Right you double the volume,

0:34:54.400 --> 0:34:57.600
<v Speaker 1>that density goes down by a factor too. But dark energies.

0:34:57.680 --> 0:35:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Density does not decrease. You double the volume, the density

0:35:01.080 --> 0:35:03.960
<v Speaker 1>stays the same. Right, So dark energy behaves in this

0:35:04.080 --> 0:35:06.799
<v Speaker 1>weird way that when you create more space, you also

0:35:06.800 --> 0:35:07.920
<v Speaker 1>create more dark energy.

0:35:08.120 --> 0:35:09.040
<v Speaker 2>Where does it come from?

0:35:09.040 --> 0:35:10.439
<v Speaker 1>Where does it come from? Yeah?

0:35:10.640 --> 0:35:11.600
<v Speaker 2>How does that keep happening?

0:35:11.719 --> 0:35:13.840
<v Speaker 1>You ask where it comes from? And that's a question

0:35:13.920 --> 0:35:16.799
<v Speaker 1>that only makes sense if it's conserved, if it has

0:35:16.840 --> 0:35:18.880
<v Speaker 1>to come from somewhere, right, Like if I make an

0:35:18.880 --> 0:35:21.120
<v Speaker 1>ice cream sandwich, do you say, hey, where did that

0:35:21.120 --> 0:35:22.840
<v Speaker 1>ice cream sandwich come from? That seems to violate the

0:35:22.880 --> 0:35:23.560
<v Speaker 1>loss of physics.

0:35:23.920 --> 0:35:26.200
<v Speaker 3>You're like, no, I wouldn't ask questions about a new

0:35:26.239 --> 0:35:28.359
<v Speaker 3>ice cream sandwich, Dane, I would just enjoy it.

0:35:28.640 --> 0:35:30.480
<v Speaker 1>Right, go on. You know it's true you have to

0:35:30.520 --> 0:35:32.720
<v Speaker 1>assemble it out of bits, But like the assembly itself

0:35:32.760 --> 0:35:35.240
<v Speaker 1>didn't violate some law physics. You didn't have to destroy

0:35:35.239 --> 0:35:37.799
<v Speaker 1>an ice cream sandwich somewhere else to make this one. Right,

0:35:38.000 --> 0:35:40.160
<v Speaker 1>there's no limit on the number of ice cream sandwiches.

0:35:40.280 --> 0:35:41.919
<v Speaker 2>Thank the Lord, hallelujah.

0:35:42.040 --> 0:35:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I know, we're all relieved. And so that question

0:35:45.120 --> 0:35:47.680
<v Speaker 1>where does the energy come from? Only make sense if

0:35:47.719 --> 0:35:50.680
<v Speaker 1>things have to flow. If you can just change the

0:35:50.719 --> 0:35:53.520
<v Speaker 1>total energy in the universe or change under ice cream sandwiches.

0:35:53.760 --> 0:35:56.880
<v Speaker 1>Then the question itself isn't actually as meaningful.

0:35:57.400 --> 0:36:00.840
<v Speaker 3>Right, So energy comes from nowhere. Energy can just like poop,

0:36:01.120 --> 0:36:01.600
<v Speaker 3>pop up.

0:36:01.800 --> 0:36:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Energy can just pop up. Yeah, absolutely, and you can

0:36:05.560 --> 0:36:06.440
<v Speaker 1>also disappear.

0:36:06.960 --> 0:36:07.160
<v Speaker 6>Right.

0:36:07.640 --> 0:36:10.279
<v Speaker 1>We talked about how the density of protons changes as

0:36:10.280 --> 0:36:12.960
<v Speaker 1>the universe expands and the density of dark energy. So

0:36:13.040 --> 0:36:15.560
<v Speaker 1>protons dilute in a way that makes a lot of sense, right,

0:36:15.640 --> 0:36:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Like you double the volume, the density goes down by

0:36:18.560 --> 0:36:22.320
<v Speaker 1>a factor of two. Interestingly, side note, same thing is

0:36:22.320 --> 0:36:25.400
<v Speaker 1>true of dark matter dark matter. As you double the

0:36:25.480 --> 0:36:28.080
<v Speaker 1>volume of the universe, dark matter density drops by two,

0:36:28.080 --> 0:36:30.399
<v Speaker 1>which is one reason why we think of dark matter

0:36:30.400 --> 0:36:32.919
<v Speaker 1>as matter, because it dilutes the way it matter does,

0:36:33.160 --> 0:36:37.480
<v Speaker 1>because radiation doesn't photons, As you double the volume of

0:36:37.480 --> 0:36:40.799
<v Speaker 1>the universe, their energy density drops by more than two.

0:36:41.560 --> 0:36:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Like you have a certain number of photons in the universe.

0:36:44.080 --> 0:36:46.160
<v Speaker 1>Now you increase the volume of the universe, you have

0:36:46.200 --> 0:36:48.600
<v Speaker 1>the same number of photons and more volumes. You might think, oh,

0:36:48.640 --> 0:36:51.480
<v Speaker 1>the energy density just decreases because you've increase the volume.

0:36:51.960 --> 0:36:56.240
<v Speaker 1>Not true, because the expansion of space also red shifts

0:36:56.360 --> 0:37:01.680
<v Speaker 1>those photons. It stretches their wavelength to rhetoric or longer wavelengths.

0:37:02.000 --> 0:37:05.880
<v Speaker 1>Longer wavelength means lower energy. So you have a universe

0:37:05.920 --> 0:37:09.400
<v Speaker 1>filled with photons, you expand that universe, their energy density

0:37:09.440 --> 0:37:13.319
<v Speaker 1>drops faster than the energy density of matter or dark matter.

0:37:13.760 --> 0:37:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Where does that energy go? It doesn't have to go anywhere.

0:37:17.040 --> 0:37:20.640
<v Speaker 3>It just goes moves into the space that was just created.

0:37:21.480 --> 0:37:23.800
<v Speaker 2>I've solved it. Where's my Nobel price?

0:37:24.200 --> 0:37:26.160
<v Speaker 1>I love that idea. People are right to be about

0:37:26.200 --> 0:37:29.080
<v Speaker 1>that a lot. They're like, Okay, energy is creative when

0:37:29.120 --> 0:37:32.000
<v Speaker 1>you expand space and also destroyed. Do these two numbers

0:37:32.000 --> 0:37:34.600
<v Speaker 1>add up, And it would be amazing if they did, right,

0:37:34.680 --> 0:37:36.799
<v Speaker 1>And that would be a beautiful explanation, you know, plus

0:37:36.880 --> 0:37:39.440
<v Speaker 1>seven thousand minus seven thousand boom. I think we figured

0:37:39.440 --> 0:37:42.680
<v Speaker 1>it out. These two numbers are vastly different scales. Like

0:37:42.719 --> 0:37:45.759
<v Speaker 1>the energy and photons in the universe is tiny, like

0:37:46.120 --> 0:37:48.279
<v Speaker 1>much less than one percent of all the energy and

0:37:48.400 --> 0:37:51.239
<v Speaker 1>universe is in photons, but the dark energy of the

0:37:51.320 --> 0:37:54.319
<v Speaker 1>universe is like two thirds of all the energy. So

0:37:54.480 --> 0:37:58.120
<v Speaker 1>energy is increasing in dark energy much much more rapidly

0:37:58.160 --> 0:38:01.960
<v Speaker 1>than energy is decreasing by redshift of photons. So we

0:38:02.000 --> 0:38:04.279
<v Speaker 1>don't think that photons are like getting turned into dark

0:38:04.360 --> 0:38:05.160
<v Speaker 1>energy or anything.

0:38:05.480 --> 0:38:09.040
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So bottom line here, we don't know where energy

0:38:09.080 --> 0:38:15.240
<v Speaker 3>comes from. We know it's not conserved. Physicists have job security.

0:38:16.000 --> 0:38:18.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we don't even really still have an answer to

0:38:18.520 --> 0:38:22.480
<v Speaker 1>the original question of like what is energy? Right, still

0:38:23.000 --> 0:38:26.000
<v Speaker 1>a description of something we've seen, and we have a

0:38:26.080 --> 0:38:29.120
<v Speaker 1>little bit more theoretical footing now because we could, in

0:38:29.120 --> 0:38:32.600
<v Speaker 1>principle define energy as the thing that would be conserved

0:38:32.840 --> 0:38:36.200
<v Speaker 1>if the laws of physics were perfectly symmetric in time. Right,

0:38:36.239 --> 0:38:39.240
<v Speaker 1>you can use Nuther's theorem as a definition of energy

0:38:39.280 --> 0:38:42.759
<v Speaker 1>and say, oh, energy is that thing which would be conserved.

0:38:42.800 --> 0:38:44.920
<v Speaker 1>And that's kind of cool. I like that. It is

0:38:45.000 --> 0:38:47.400
<v Speaker 1>very theoretically grounded, but it doesn't give you like a

0:38:47.400 --> 0:38:51.200
<v Speaker 1>conceptual sense for like what is this thing? But unfortunately

0:38:51.200 --> 0:38:53.680
<v Speaker 1>that sort of turns you back to the philosophy of it, like, well,

0:38:53.719 --> 0:38:55.520
<v Speaker 1>what do you mean what is this thing? What kind

0:38:55.560 --> 0:38:58.600
<v Speaker 1>of answer are you looking for when you ask what

0:38:58.760 --> 0:39:02.520
<v Speaker 1>is energy? Part of the question is not satisfied by like, well,

0:39:02.560 --> 0:39:04.880
<v Speaker 1>here's the description of the kinds of energy, here are

0:39:04.920 --> 0:39:07.600
<v Speaker 1>the rules that it follows. Here's how it's created, here's

0:39:07.600 --> 0:39:10.560
<v Speaker 1>how it's destroyed. Here's how it's not concerned. But part

0:39:10.560 --> 0:39:13.320
<v Speaker 1>of the question is not answered by that description.

0:39:13.440 --> 0:39:15.600
<v Speaker 2>Do you think I have no idea?

0:39:16.000 --> 0:39:19.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I feel like there's something about it that's still unsatisfied,

0:39:19.600 --> 0:39:22.040
<v Speaker 1>that's still like yeah, but what is it? You know, like,

0:39:22.080 --> 0:39:23.840
<v Speaker 1>why do we have it? Where does it come from?

0:39:24.440 --> 0:39:26.960
<v Speaker 1>It's a deep human question, but like the human questions

0:39:26.960 --> 0:39:30.480
<v Speaker 1>we ask, aren't always the appropriate questions, aren't always the

0:39:30.480 --> 0:39:33.920
<v Speaker 1>ones that answer the question. Sometimes we discover that something

0:39:34.000 --> 0:39:36.719
<v Speaker 1>is different from how we expected it to behave and

0:39:36.760 --> 0:39:38.560
<v Speaker 1>that means the kind of questions we should ask about

0:39:38.600 --> 0:39:43.520
<v Speaker 1>it are changing. Because energy isn't something that comes from somewhere.

0:39:43.560 --> 0:39:46.360
<v Speaker 1>It's a feature of the universe, and it does seem

0:39:46.360 --> 0:39:50.040
<v Speaker 1>to be important because under lots of context it is conserved,

0:39:50.640 --> 0:39:52.560
<v Speaker 1>but it's not fundamental in that way, and so it

0:39:52.560 --> 0:39:56.120
<v Speaker 1>could just be something that humans notice, something the humans

0:39:56.239 --> 0:39:59.239
<v Speaker 1>like to calculate, something that connects with our everyday experience

0:39:59.400 --> 0:40:01.920
<v Speaker 1>in a way that it's important to us, but isn't

0:40:02.120 --> 0:40:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Like alien physicists, for example.

0:40:04.280 --> 0:40:08.240
<v Speaker 3>It only appears to be conserved on human scales because

0:40:08.880 --> 0:40:11.280
<v Speaker 3>it's being lost at such low numbers it's hard to measure,

0:40:11.320 --> 0:40:14.160
<v Speaker 3>but it's not even conserved on small scales.

0:40:14.200 --> 0:40:14.879
<v Speaker 2>It just looks that way.

0:40:14.960 --> 0:40:17.799
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's exactly right. And I think it's useful to

0:40:17.800 --> 0:40:20.120
<v Speaker 1>think about this because it impacts other questions we have.

0:40:20.680 --> 0:40:23.719
<v Speaker 1>Like a lot of listeners who wrote in Thought about

0:40:23.719 --> 0:40:26.080
<v Speaker 1>the conservation of energy, and it talked about how the

0:40:26.080 --> 0:40:29.680
<v Speaker 1>Big Bang had energy, and maybe all the energy in

0:40:29.680 --> 0:40:32.759
<v Speaker 1>the universe just came from the Big Bang, right, And

0:40:32.840 --> 0:40:35.600
<v Speaker 1>so I hope the answer today reveals that, like, no,

0:40:35.760 --> 0:40:38.160
<v Speaker 1>there's some energy in the universe which was created after

0:40:38.239 --> 0:40:40.480
<v Speaker 1>the Big Bang. Right, This expansion of the universe is

0:40:40.520 --> 0:40:43.160
<v Speaker 1>making energy, and that's post Big Bang energy. And also

0:40:43.280 --> 0:40:45.560
<v Speaker 1>some of the energy of the Big Bang is gone now.

0:40:46.360 --> 0:40:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Like you have the Big Bang, you have matter and

0:40:48.080 --> 0:40:51.440
<v Speaker 1>anti matter created, they annihilate. You have a universe mostly

0:40:51.480 --> 0:40:54.960
<v Speaker 1>filled briefly with photons. So photons did dominate the universe

0:40:55.040 --> 0:40:58.399
<v Speaker 1>energy budget initially, but a lot of those photons are

0:40:58.440 --> 0:41:02.279
<v Speaker 1>now red shifted and their energy is gone. Like we

0:41:02.320 --> 0:41:04.640
<v Speaker 1>talk on the podcast a lot about the cosmic microwave

0:41:04.680 --> 0:41:08.160
<v Speaker 1>background radiation, this energy from the early universe that reveals

0:41:08.200 --> 0:41:10.839
<v Speaker 1>so much about how the universe came together and what

0:41:10.880 --> 0:41:13.680
<v Speaker 1>it means and how it rippled. But those photons are

0:41:13.800 --> 0:41:16.479
<v Speaker 1>very very red. They're at a temperature of like two

0:41:16.480 --> 0:41:20.279
<v Speaker 1>point seven calvin, very very cold. The plasma that made

0:41:20.320 --> 0:41:24.319
<v Speaker 1>them was like three hundred thousand degrees calvin. Right, they

0:41:24.360 --> 0:41:26.760
<v Speaker 1>were a glow of them, a very very hot plasma,

0:41:26.920 --> 0:41:31.640
<v Speaker 1>very energetic photons. Originally that energy is just gone now right,

0:41:31.760 --> 0:41:34.680
<v Speaker 1>It didn't go anywhere. So a lot of the energy

0:41:34.719 --> 0:41:36.440
<v Speaker 1>in the universe didn't come from the Big Bang, and

0:41:36.480 --> 0:41:38.359
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the energy of the Big Bang is

0:41:38.400 --> 0:41:39.719
<v Speaker 1>now gone, it's fizzled out.

0:41:40.000 --> 0:41:43.080
<v Speaker 3>Do we have less energy over time, more energy over time,

0:41:43.160 --> 0:41:45.080
<v Speaker 3>or do we not know how this balance is working out.

0:41:45.360 --> 0:41:47.920
<v Speaker 1>We definitely have more energy over time because dark energy

0:41:47.960 --> 0:41:51.760
<v Speaker 1>is much more dramatic, and so all the energy created

0:41:51.880 --> 0:41:56.080
<v Speaker 1>by dark energy, the expansion of the universe vastly outweighs

0:41:56.440 --> 0:41:59.480
<v Speaker 1>the energy loss due to red shifts of photons.

0:42:00.000 --> 0:42:00.880
<v Speaker 2>You would said that earlier.

0:42:00.920 --> 0:42:04.240
<v Speaker 3>But is that the only way that energy is lost

0:42:04.360 --> 0:42:06.480
<v Speaker 3>or is energy lost while humans are doing all of

0:42:06.520 --> 0:42:09.640
<v Speaker 3>these reactions down here, and is that impacting the like

0:42:09.800 --> 0:42:11.200
<v Speaker 3>mass balance equation.

0:42:10.920 --> 0:42:11.680
<v Speaker 2>For the universe?

0:42:12.880 --> 0:42:15.359
<v Speaker 1>To my knowledge, the expansion of the universe is the

0:42:15.400 --> 0:42:18.520
<v Speaker 1>only source of energy gain or loss. Right, You noticed

0:42:18.520 --> 0:42:20.640
<v Speaker 1>that it's an underlying mechanism for both of these things,

0:42:20.680 --> 0:42:23.919
<v Speaker 1>because it's the place that Norther's theorem is violated, right,

0:42:24.239 --> 0:42:26.600
<v Speaker 1>It's the thing that doesn't respect the time symmetry. So

0:42:26.640 --> 0:42:30.480
<v Speaker 1>the expansion of the universe redshifts those photons, breaking conservation

0:42:30.520 --> 0:42:34.160
<v Speaker 1>of energy and creates news space breaking conservation of energy.

0:42:34.400 --> 0:42:37.320
<v Speaker 1>So anything that's sensitive to the expansion of the universe

0:42:37.719 --> 0:42:41.920
<v Speaker 1>can be a source of the violation of conservation of energy.

0:42:42.400 --> 0:42:44.319
<v Speaker 1>And I want to make another comment about the Big Bang,

0:42:44.360 --> 0:42:46.560
<v Speaker 1>which is it seems like a little bit of a

0:42:46.640 --> 0:42:50.760
<v Speaker 1>loss of power to explain and explore, Like if energy

0:42:50.840 --> 0:42:52.759
<v Speaker 1>was conserved, then we could do this cool thing of

0:42:52.800 --> 0:42:55.120
<v Speaker 1>tracing it back into the Sun and then where that

0:42:55.160 --> 0:42:56.719
<v Speaker 1>came from, where that came from, all the way back

0:42:56.760 --> 0:42:59.200
<v Speaker 1>to the Big Bang. It's like we have a ledger,

0:42:59.400 --> 0:43:02.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, the tell us how energy slashes around, and

0:43:02.560 --> 0:43:05.239
<v Speaker 1>maybe by tracing that we could learn something. And that

0:43:05.320 --> 0:43:07.280
<v Speaker 1>seems really cool, and it feels like, oh, oh, maybe

0:43:07.280 --> 0:43:09.800
<v Speaker 1>we've lost that. Maybe we can no longer learn about

0:43:09.800 --> 0:43:12.960
<v Speaker 1>the Big Bang by studying energy. Well, just now we

0:43:13.000 --> 0:43:15.960
<v Speaker 1>can ask different questions, you know, we can ask how

0:43:16.040 --> 0:43:18.719
<v Speaker 1>the energy for the Big Bang came about, Like we

0:43:18.840 --> 0:43:22.280
<v Speaker 1>know that the universe was filled with hot, frothing energy

0:43:22.360 --> 0:43:25.400
<v Speaker 1>early on. Where did that come from? We no longer

0:43:25.440 --> 0:43:27.319
<v Speaker 1>have to just answer that by saying, oh, it came

0:43:27.320 --> 0:43:29.960
<v Speaker 1>from this other thing with equal energy. Now we have

0:43:30.040 --> 0:43:32.960
<v Speaker 1>more ideas about how you can create all that energy

0:43:33.400 --> 0:43:36.800
<v Speaker 1>from some earlier denser states. So, if anything, it opens

0:43:36.920 --> 0:43:39.680
<v Speaker 1>up the examination to think differently about the origin of

0:43:39.719 --> 0:43:41.719
<v Speaker 1>the universe. And you know, that's what we want. We

0:43:41.800 --> 0:43:44.480
<v Speaker 1>want our understanding of physics to evolve and to give

0:43:44.560 --> 0:43:47.520
<v Speaker 1>us new ways to think about the whole context of

0:43:47.680 --> 0:43:50.680
<v Speaker 1>reality and where it all came from. And so to me,

0:43:50.800 --> 0:43:53.960
<v Speaker 1>that's exciting. It like removes blinders a little bit and

0:43:54.080 --> 0:43:57.400
<v Speaker 1>gives us a broader sense for how the universe works

0:43:57.440 --> 0:43:59.040
<v Speaker 1>and maybe how it all started.

0:43:59.560 --> 0:44:02.359
<v Speaker 3>I bet you are great at writing grants. Okay, we

0:44:02.360 --> 0:44:04.560
<v Speaker 3>were wrong about that, but that's okay, because it's the

0:44:04.680 --> 0:44:07.160
<v Speaker 3>fascinating thing is actually revealed now.

0:44:08.120 --> 0:44:09.920
<v Speaker 1>So please send me a million dollars to make a

0:44:09.920 --> 0:44:11.719
<v Speaker 1>lot of ice cream sandwiches, because I have a lot

0:44:11.760 --> 0:44:12.560
<v Speaker 1>to learn.

0:44:12.760 --> 0:44:15.680
<v Speaker 3>You know, please share those ice cream sandwiches. Daniel, Yes,

0:44:15.760 --> 0:44:16.719
<v Speaker 3>Daniel needs this money.

0:44:16.719 --> 0:44:21.120
<v Speaker 1>It's important, everybody exactly. My cookies and cream project really

0:44:21.600 --> 0:44:23.960
<v Speaker 1>top priority for national security.

0:44:24.719 --> 0:44:27.279
<v Speaker 2>That's right, that's right, all right.

0:44:27.360 --> 0:44:31.239
<v Speaker 3>Well, I learned a ton today actually, and I can't

0:44:31.239 --> 0:44:33.239
<v Speaker 3>wait to tell my daughter actually about some of this

0:44:33.280 --> 0:44:34.720
<v Speaker 3>stuff and blow her mind somehow.

0:44:34.719 --> 0:44:36.440
<v Speaker 2>I feel like she's going to find this really interesting.

0:44:36.560 --> 0:44:39.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. So energy is not conserved, which means it doesn't

0:44:39.719 --> 0:44:43.360
<v Speaker 1>have to con from anywhere. But our understanding does seem

0:44:43.400 --> 0:44:45.239
<v Speaker 1>to be growing, and it seems to em and a

0:44:45.320 --> 0:44:47.960
<v Speaker 1>from these deep studies of how the universe works. So

0:44:48.440 --> 0:44:49.359
<v Speaker 1>let's keep doing that.

0:44:49.440 --> 0:44:53.640
<v Speaker 3>Let's hope our understanding is expanding faster than the information

0:44:53.680 --> 0:44:54.200
<v Speaker 3>we're losing.

0:44:55.480 --> 0:44:57.720
<v Speaker 1>All right, go off and enjoy ice cream sandwich. Everyone

0:44:57.840 --> 0:44:58.279
<v Speaker 1>on us?

0:44:58.560 --> 0:45:00.799
<v Speaker 2>Oh, not on us, Not on us, Daniel.

0:45:00.480 --> 0:45:02.839
<v Speaker 1>Virtually on us, spiritually on us.

0:45:03.239 --> 0:45:04.440
<v Speaker 2>Don't send us three sets.

0:45:04.719 --> 0:45:06.440
<v Speaker 1>That's all right, emotionally on us.

0:45:06.520 --> 0:45:08.320
<v Speaker 2>There you go, Okay.

0:45:15.400 --> 0:45:18.920
<v Speaker 3>Daniel and Kelly's Extraordinary Universe is produced by iHeartRadio.

0:45:19.160 --> 0:45:21.680
<v Speaker 2>We would love to hear from you, We really would.

0:45:21.840 --> 0:45:24.600
<v Speaker 1>We want to know what questions you have about this

0:45:24.800 --> 0:45:26.480
<v Speaker 1>Extraordinary Universe.

0:45:26.600 --> 0:45:29.560
<v Speaker 3>We want to know your thoughts on recent shows, suggestions

0:45:29.560 --> 0:45:32.560
<v Speaker 3>for future shows. If you contact us, we will get

0:45:32.600 --> 0:45:33.000
<v Speaker 3>back to you.

0:45:33.200 --> 0:45:36.719
<v Speaker 1>We really mean it. We answer every message. Email us

0:45:36.760 --> 0:45:39.600
<v Speaker 1>at Questions at danieland Kelly dot org.

0:45:39.840 --> 0:45:41.080
<v Speaker 2>You can find us on social media.

0:45:41.200 --> 0:45:45.000
<v Speaker 3>We have accounts on x, Instagram, Blue Sky and on

0:45:45.080 --> 0:45:46.000
<v Speaker 3>all of those platforms.

0:45:46.040 --> 0:45:49.000
<v Speaker 2>You can find us at D and K Universe.

0:45:49.120 --> 0:45:50.640
<v Speaker 1>Don't be shy right to us.