Speaker 1: You know how much I love my pillow, how much
Speaker 1: it's changed my life for the better. Well, I figured
Speaker 1: it was about time that I let you know about
Speaker 1: my pillow sheets Now. Mike Lindell has a passion to
Speaker 1: help you get the best sleep of your life. That's
Speaker 1: why he has created the new Giza Dream Bedsheets. Now.
Speaker 1: These sheets are made from the world's best cotton, Giza
Speaker 1: that's only grown in a very small region where the
Speaker 1: Sahara Desert, Mediterranean Sea, and the Nile River all meet
Speaker 1: to create the ideal weather conditions for growing cotton. These
Speaker 1: Giza sheets are available in a variety of colors. They
Speaker 1: come with Mike's ten year warranty sixty day money back guarantee.
Speaker 1: The first night you sleep on these sheets, it's heaven.
Speaker 1: You'll never want to sleep on anything else. Now, right now,
Speaker 1: you my listeners, You're gonna save thirty percent and get
Speaker 1: free shipping when you use the promo code Shawn seven
Speaker 1: Sea and seven when you go to my pillow dot
Speaker 1: com again. That's promo code Sewn seven Sea and seven
Speaker 1: at mipillow dot com. All right, quad you with us
Speaker 1: and happy Monday, and right down our toll free telephone number.
Speaker 1: Big Newsweek got a couple of investigated reports. We are
Speaker 1: going to get to great, great story. Ukrainians are now
Speaker 1: saying to US prosecutors, why don't you want our evidence?
Speaker 1: I mean, think of collusion, evidence of wrongdoing by American
Speaker 1: Democrats and their allies in the Ukraine, ranging from twenty
Speaker 1: sixteen election interference, collusion, and obstructing of criminal probes. That
Speaker 1: would be Joe Biden. I'll get to in a second.
Speaker 1: You have the head of the Prosecutor General's International Legal
Speaker 1: Cooperation Department, John Solomon, breaking the story. They'll be with
Speaker 1: us in a little bit. We're supposed to share information
Speaker 1: during a working trip at the United States, he said. However,
Speaker 1: the US ambassador blocked us from obtaining a visa because
Speaker 1: they were going to give information that would have been
Speaker 1: damning about collusion and the influence of Ukrainians in the
Speaker 1: in the twenty sixteen election. You know, I'm telling it.
Speaker 1: Does it? It does not matter what the issue is.
Speaker 1: If it's if it's sexual assault, it doesn't matter unless
Speaker 1: you're a Republican. You get the Kavanaugh treatment or you
Speaker 1: get the Lieutenant Governor of Virginia treatment. I mean, it's
Speaker 1: pretty pathetic. You know, the immigration it's great in Obama
Speaker 1: second term. We're gonna build a wall, We're gonna fund
Speaker 1: up not if Trump's president. They care about the issue
Speaker 1: that they care about dreamers do all that was put
Speaker 1: on the table. They don't care about any of it.
Speaker 1: You know, I'm watching all of these twenty twenty candidates.
Speaker 1: They're all losing their minds. You know. Now their big
Speaker 1: fixation is investigate the president of its tax returns. That's
Speaker 1: never gonna happen, and if it does happen, every American
Speaker 1: needs to be scared today. I don't know why, because
Speaker 1: they're gonna want to look at your tax returns if
Speaker 1: you take a political position that you shouldn't. In other words,
Speaker 1: they're weaponizing the IRS, which is not their first time.
Speaker 1: You know, when you have a Jay Sekulo said this
Speaker 1: weekend the White House they're not turning over the president's
Speaker 1: tax returns. And by the way, they have no intention
Speaker 1: of trying to obtain Nancy Pelosi's tax returns from the IRS,
Speaker 1: you know, despite her past refusal to release them voluntarily.
Speaker 1: You know, just like healthcare, you get Obamacare, lose your doctor,
Speaker 1: your plan, and pay more, and they keep their healthcare.
Speaker 1: They're just a bunch of phonies. I never saw such
Speaker 1: rank hypocrisy. Where are all the IE believers on the
Speaker 1: in the case in Virginia? I mean to you know,
Speaker 1: Pelosi is a minimum net worth the twenty nine point
Speaker 1: three million dollars according to an analysis of roll call.
Speaker 1: They have an estate in San Francisco, now outside of
Speaker 1: the enclave of their candid community. What do we know
Speaker 1: that there are people that are homeless all over the place,
Speaker 1: feces they're going, a bathroom in the streets, and needles everywhere.
Speaker 1: He hasn't done anything to use any of that those
Speaker 1: millions of dollars to help the people earn their own district.
Speaker 1: You know, it's valued between what five million and twenty
Speaker 1: five million dollars. The estate that Pelosi has with a
Speaker 1: wall and by the way, description of the property is
Speaker 1: posted on this architect's website inspired by blah blah blah blah,
Speaker 1: a guesthouse and a Z shape pool. Why don't you
Speaker 1: let the homeless people down the block going the Z
Speaker 1: shape pool whatever Z shape pool is. And the couple
Speaker 1: also collects, you know, between five thousand and fifteen thousand
Speaker 1: an income for the gross sale of grapes at their vineyard.
Speaker 1: I wasn't that nice. I wonder what kind of wine
Speaker 1: they're drinking. You know, you know, you get it's it's
Speaker 1: interesting Adams shift a guy on tape colluding. I won't
Speaker 1: play it now. Maybe later he still sees ample evidence
Speaker 1: of collusion. Now they've moved on. So they're not going
Speaker 1: to get anything on collusion. But now let's try and
Speaker 1: get Trump's tax returns. We'll move on to the next issue,
Speaker 1: the next fixation, the next attack. They don't care about collusion.
Speaker 1: They don't care about sexual assault. They don't care about
Speaker 1: people like they say they do. They only care if
Speaker 1: they can use topics even as serious and significant as
Speaker 1: you know, look at the case in Virginia as rape
Speaker 1: and violent sexual assault. They can't bludgeon Trump or a
Speaker 1: judge for the Supreme Court or anybody that likes Trump,
Speaker 1: then why bother? You know, Nadler's saying, well, the Muller report,
Speaker 1: there could be grounds for impeachment. We don't think there's
Speaker 1: rises to the level. It's they never want this to end.
Speaker 1: They'd never cared about collusion, never mind that you have
Speaker 1: to with obstruction proven tent. Never mind there's no underlying crime,
Speaker 1: because Muller was quoted in Barr's letter, no evidence of
Speaker 1: any collusion of any type. It's so interesting to watch
Speaker 1: even Obama expressing concerns about this radical move to the left,
Speaker 1: and he went out there this weekend saying, well, it
Speaker 1: could end up undercutting allies in the Democratic Party. Is
Speaker 1: that some one of the things I worry about. I'm
Speaker 1: not worried about what he's worried about anyway. And progress.
Speaker 1: One of the things I worry about is American progressives
Speaker 1: in the US. That's his whole party. He was the
Speaker 1: first one that went that hard left. Bill Clinton was
Speaker 1: not that hard left. He tried to be for the
Speaker 1: first two years of his presidency and he got a
Speaker 1: slacking in the mid term and new Ingrich and Republicans
Speaker 1: came to power for the first time in forty years,
Speaker 1: and he thought better of it. The Arab big government's
Speaker 1: now over. Let's do the end of welfare as we
Speaker 1: know it, Willy, So you know, but that is this
Speaker 1: is your new modern democratic problems. Watching over the weekend,
Speaker 1: Bernie Sanders wants incarcerated prisoners to vote. Democrats are pushing
Speaker 1: hard to get rid of the electoral college. And you're saying, well,
Speaker 1: why not have the popular vote? Well, if you go
Speaker 1: back as we did last week and you read our
Speaker 1: framers and our founders, they were very adamant about protecting
Speaker 1: the states and their rights and not being gobbled up
Speaker 1: by big cities like oh, New York, DC, Los Angeles,
Speaker 1: San Francisco, or states like New Jersey and Illinois, because
Speaker 1: they'll decide every election. If you're gonna move to the
Speaker 1: popular vote, and let me tell you how that's gonna end.
Speaker 1: That's gonna end with states saying you know what, see
Speaker 1: you later, and it won't be the United States of
Speaker 1: America anymore. Why is it that they want prisoners to vote?
Speaker 1: Why isn't they want open borders? Oh, I know that
Speaker 1: there are some maybe even Republicans and business people. They
Speaker 1: want cheaper labor. How about putting Americans to work? Now?
Speaker 1: How about Americans if we need to, if we have
Speaker 1: openings and we kind of do right now for additional workers. Sure,
Speaker 1: but they got to come in legally, they got to
Speaker 1: be vetted, They got to take care of themselves while
Speaker 1: they're here. So they want to get rid of the
Speaker 1: electoral college. They want to stack the Supreme Court prisoners
Speaker 1: now can vote. They want to knock down any border walls.
Speaker 1: I guess hoping that anybody that comes into the country
Speaker 1: that might need government aid is going to love the
Speaker 1: New Green Deal that will pay you money whether you
Speaker 1: work or you don't work, or guarantee you healthcare in
Speaker 1: New York City under Comrade de Blasio, or you know,
Speaker 1: you know United Socialist Republic of California under Gavin Newsom,
Speaker 1: which is offering anybody legally illegal, wherever you come from,
Speaker 1: free healthcare. My advice is, if you get sick, go
Speaker 1: to California. They don't care, they're they're offering that as
Speaker 1: an incentive. Go visit, find a good hospital, maybe USC
Speaker 1: maybe UCLA, get your medical treatment, and go back home.
Speaker 1: Gavin says it's free. You don't have to be a resident.
Speaker 1: You don't even have to be in the country legally.
Speaker 1: You know, a party that is now clinging to during
Speaker 1: birth abortions and after birth abortion even you know, will
Speaker 1: deliver the baby, make the baby comfortable, let the mother decide.
Speaker 1: Why do they want to stack the Supreme Court Because
Speaker 1: what they could never win at the ballot box, what
Speaker 1: they could never get done legislatively. They want the courts
Speaker 1: to do. Of course, if you're gonna stack the Supreme Court,
Speaker 1: it would be stacked during a when a Democrats president.
Speaker 1: You know, do you ever think you'd here for the
Speaker 1: first time because of Donald Trump's policies? America's energy independent?
Speaker 1: How cool is that? Why is that cool? Well, it's
Speaker 1: good number one because the energy sector pays a lot
Speaker 1: of money. I mean the numbers of jobs we will
Speaker 1: ultimately create when we start drilling in anwar which has
Speaker 1: now been opened up, when we get the Keystone and
Speaker 1: the Dakota pipelines online and those are finished, and now
Speaker 1: we're producing even more. We are the biggest oil gas
Speaker 1: producing country in the world. Okay, so you've got truck
Speaker 1: drivers that are making a hundred grand and they'll teach
Speaker 1: how to drive the truck. Wow, if you're making forty
Speaker 1: grand right now, that is a drastic change to your lifestyle.
Speaker 1: That means you're gonna hopefully get a new house, your
Speaker 1: first house, maybe hopefully get a new truck, hopefully be
Speaker 1: able to take your kids to Disney and all of
Speaker 1: a sudden, life's looking good a lot better than it was.
Speaker 1: That's called American jobs. It's called them. And then you
Speaker 1: think of the national security implications of this. Okay, countries
Speaker 1: we've been importing energy from all these years. Many of
Speaker 1: them hate our guts. Yeah, let's start with the Saudis.
Speaker 1: I'm not I've been like the most outspoken person against
Speaker 1: Shariah in the country. I don't know why civil libertarians
Speaker 1: and some of these groups don't join with me. They
Speaker 1: treat women like garbage. They tell them how to dress,
Speaker 1: they tell them in some cases, there's no such thing
Speaker 1: as marital rape. In some cases, women are beaten. In
Speaker 1: some cases, women can drive, women can't travel without their
Speaker 1: husband's permission, that women can't leave the house without a
Speaker 1: male relative. You know, look at how gays and lesbians
Speaker 1: are treated. It doesn't matter Shia Sunni around Saudi Arabia.
Speaker 1: You know, they're killing gays and lesbians for being who
Speaker 1: they are. Why don't you leave them alone? And it's
Speaker 1: happening more often than you think, Or they're throwing them
Speaker 1: off buildings, are stony people to death, these are human beings.
Speaker 1: Or the fact that they persecute. You want to try
Speaker 1: and build a temple or a Christian church in some
Speaker 1: of these countries, good luck with that. Now that you're
Speaker 1: persecuted if you don't believe in their views. You don't
Speaker 1: hear a boo out of Democrats that claim they have
Speaker 1: a monopoly on of compassion for all these groups. And
Speaker 1: now look at the proposal. No oil or gas for
Speaker 1: ten years. In ten years from now, we're gonna stop,
Speaker 1: but they'll no combustion engine. You're gonna have to buy
Speaker 1: an electric carpet. They've gotta plenty of places you can
Speaker 1: charge it. And then, of course you're gonna be guaranteed
Speaker 1: your government job. That's only if you're willing to work.
Speaker 1: You'll still get the benefits of your unwilling to work,
Speaker 1: your government Medicare for all, but you don't get any
Speaker 1: choices of private insurance. You will take what they give
Speaker 1: you and it will fail guaranteed. Then you're gonna end
Speaker 1: We're gonna end up like the health system even a
Speaker 1: great Britain. Oh you're Patton, Well you know the life
Speaker 1: expectancy for somebody like yourself, ma'am is well, you've already
Speaker 1: passed your life expectancy. You're not eligible for a hip
Speaker 1: replacement or a knee report. Well, what if that person's
Speaker 1: about to live twenty more years? And that's what happens,
Speaker 1: We'll get rid of the combustion engine. Great, We're gonna
Speaker 1: get guaranteed government jobs, guaranteed healthy food, guaranteed vacations, guaranteed healthcare,
Speaker 1: guaranteed retirement. We're gonna and the goal is as soon
Speaker 1: as we can to eliminate cows and airplanes too. And
Speaker 1: we're gonna build high speed rail. Oh are you gonna
Speaker 1: build it across the pond to Europe or under the pond?
Speaker 1: How are you gonna get that to Asia? I'm just curious.
Speaker 1: Where's that gonna be built? How are we going to
Speaker 1: get to New Zealand and Australia. This is insane and
Speaker 1: I'm watching all of these people this weekend. They cannot
Speaker 1: help themselves. We got a lot to get to eight
Speaker 1: hundred and nine for one Sean Tofrey telephone, but we
Speaker 1: have Kirsten Nielsen has been fired a lot of people now,
Speaker 1: I guess pleading guilty in that college admission scandal issue,
Speaker 1: including Felicity Hubman. I guess has played guilty. I think
Speaker 1: she was the one that did the least amount. I
Speaker 1: think it was only like fifteen grand I don't think
Speaker 1: she put a picture of her kid playing a sport
Speaker 1: that the kid never played. Imagine taking your kid's picture,
Speaker 1: you know, I mean, you know, and some people don't
Speaker 1: seem to care. I've read an article today about it.
Speaker 1: I'm like, well, I just happen to know a lot
Speaker 1: of college athletes. And you know, you can check my
Speaker 1: daughter's tennis record out from when she's seven, my son
Speaker 1: one day's nine. And there's a lot of traveling, a
Speaker 1: lot of states, you know, a lot of bad weekends.
Speaker 1: Well this sometimes that's a good one. Still, you know,
Speaker 1: there were more than thirty four million American smokers. I
Speaker 1: bet that finding us satisfying alternative to cigarettes is at
Speaker 1: the top of your list if you're a smoker. Look,
Speaker 1: I've been there before. But after many years of smoking,
Speaker 1: I finally made the switch to Jewel. Is no more
Speaker 1: worrying about the way my clothes smell, worrying about what
Speaker 1: people are gonna say. With Jewel, everything is so much
Speaker 1: easier now. Jewel is a vaporizer that contains nicotine for
Speaker 1: a satisfying transition. When I found Jewel, it was a
Speaker 1: complete game changer. L Jewel was designed by smokers for
Speaker 1: smokers to be an alternative to cigarettes. From it's simple
Speaker 1: to use interface to its clean technology. Well, Jewel has
Speaker 1: no cigarette ash, odor or mess. So if you're one
Speaker 1: of the thirty four million adults who smoke, know that
Speaker 1: there is an alternative to cigarettes. How to discover the
Speaker 1: smoking alternative? That's nothing like you've tried visit Juul dot
Speaker 1: com slash switch America. That's Juul dot com slash Switch
Speaker 1: America and warning this product does contain nicotine and nicotine
Speaker 1: is an addictive chemical. Oh, there might be something in
Speaker 1: the Muller report, but then care about obstruction of Hillary.
Speaker 1: Hillary deleted thirty three thousand emails. You know the story.
Speaker 1: You know Obama's worried about the far left of his parties.
Speaker 1: Even he even discussed assimilation. You know, I've used the term.
Speaker 1: You know, once you are come in the country legally
Speaker 1: and if you speak a different language. The most important thing,
Speaker 1: I think if because the language of success. We don't
Speaker 1: want anybody to to not have access to all that
Speaker 1: we have to offer. So English in that sense is
Speaker 1: the language of success. You want people to have that
Speaker 1: advantage they can't speak it, you want them to learn
Speaker 1: for their own benefit so that they're not going to
Speaker 1: not get a job because they don't speak English, but
Speaker 1: if a Republican said it, God help you. I've always
Speaker 1: said it's the language of success. By the way, there
Speaker 1: is an a cause Cortez. I have no idea what
Speaker 1: she's up to, but she's very sensitive to all criticism.
Speaker 1: Now and literally she was featured. I guess that everybody
Speaker 1: was over at Al Sharpton's National Action Network, all saying
Speaker 1: there for reparations. Anyway, she was featured earlier in the day.
Speaker 1: So people campaigning against the Amazon campus are financially illiterate,
Speaker 1: said Tracy Maitland, President, chief investment officer of Advent Capital Management.
Speaker 1: You know how many jobs we're going to be created,
Speaker 1: high paying on average, hundred and fifty thousand dollars a
Speaker 1: year jobs. Goodbye. Now New York was over paying for it,
Speaker 1: but New York is stupid. Now we'll see what state
Speaker 1: those jobs lended. Simply Save Home Security. This is a
Speaker 1: truly good, honest, great company, and you don't find many
Speaker 1: of those anymore. And Simply Safe is one percent committed
Speaker 1: to helping you fear less in your home. Now they'll
Speaker 1: protect your home twenty four seven and they really take
Speaker 1: care of you now. Simply Safe CEO star the company
Speaker 1: from the ground up, right at his kitchen counter. Now
Speaker 1: it's the fastest growing home security company in the entire country,
Speaker 1: and they protect millions of Americans every single day. But
Speaker 1: they still run like a small company with the same
Speaker 1: values that they started with. And that's why simply Safe
Speaker 1: has no contracts, no hidden fees, no installation fees. Now
Speaker 1: the system is wireless and practically invisible in your home,
Speaker 1: and you can order it online just a few clicks
Speaker 1: and you'll see that it feels good to fear less.
Speaker 1: Just go to simply safe dot com slash Shawn to
Speaker 1: get ten percent off. That's simply safe dot com, slash
Speaker 1: sean free shipping, free returns, and ten percent off because
Speaker 1: you listen to my show simply safe dot com slash Shawn.
Speaker 1: All right, twenty five now till the top of the hour,
Speaker 1: eight hundred and nine four one Shawn. If you want
Speaker 1: to be a part of the program, I just go
Speaker 1: over this list and you're thinking, Wow, prisoners voting in prison.
Speaker 1: You know, goodbye electoral college. Let's let New York, New Jersey,
Speaker 1: and California decide every president. Dumb You're not gonna have
Speaker 1: of a United States at that point, during after birth abortions.
Speaker 1: I can't even believe I'm saying those words, but it's you.
Speaker 1: We've played it enough, you've heard it yourself. Then you
Speaker 1: got open borders, no walls. Let's stack the Supreme Court.
Speaker 1: Let's let's we will tell you how to run your
Speaker 1: business at Cassio, Cortez said, well, we'll tell you. Oh,
Speaker 1: and we're going to tax corporations at a ninety percent
Speaker 1: top marginal rate. Okay, what do you think what business
Speaker 1: is going to build anywhere in America with a ninety
Speaker 1: percent top marginal rate? Nobody and people are in business
Speaker 1: to make a profit. I know that's horrible, but how
Speaker 1: do they make a profit. They make a profit if
Speaker 1: they create goods and services that people we the people want,
Speaker 1: need and desire. If you didn't want whatever it is
Speaker 1: they're selling, they'd be out of business. If you didn't
Speaker 1: want this service, you'd be out of business. You'd be
Speaker 1: painting your own house, you know, maybe cutting your own
Speaker 1: lawn or maybe doing your own plumbing, building your own house.
Speaker 1: Good luck with that, because it's not going to be
Speaker 1: as nice as the one you're probably living in. But
Speaker 1: that's what that's capitalism. Now, you take away the incentive
Speaker 1: that people are gonna make a profit if they work
Speaker 1: really hard and offer you the best price, best service
Speaker 1: they can and build a reputation. And yeah, well maybe
Speaker 1: over time they get themselves a nice house, and they're
Speaker 1: able to buy a nice car, and they're able to
Speaker 1: pay for their kids to go on vacation and meat
Speaker 1: dinner and maybe pay for college, which by the way,
Speaker 1: is not cheap anymore. This is this is it. And
Speaker 1: then we're gonna we're gonna tax individuals at seventy percent
Speaker 1: top marginal rate. All right, what does that do? On
Speaker 1: top marginal rate at seventy percent means oh, all those
Speaker 1: people that left New York, California, New Jersey, Illinois and
Speaker 1: then they're headed to Tennessee, Florida and Texas and the
Speaker 1: Carolinas and other low tax states. Yeah, they'll probably if
Speaker 1: it's nationwide, they might leave the country now and they're
Speaker 1: gonna take their money with them, you know. All the
Speaker 1: Then we're gonna have a wealth tax. According to Elizabeth Warren, Great,
Speaker 1: we tax you, and then we're gonna if you saved enough,
Speaker 1: we're gonna come back and take another big chunk of
Speaker 1: whatever you saved because you saved too much, and then
Speaker 1: we're gonna use that to pay for guaranteed gait daycare.
Speaker 1: Then we'll get rid of oil and gas, the lifeblood
Speaker 1: of every economy you think about. You want to you
Speaker 1: want to stop pouting. You really want Russia the hostile regime,
Speaker 1: pouting a hostile actor. You really want to bring Russia
Speaker 1: to its knees. I'll tell you how to do it.
Speaker 1: It's not that hard. Well, we've got We've got more
Speaker 1: energy resources in this country then all these other countries combined.
Speaker 1: Right now. You know when Merkel made this, you know,
Speaker 1: billions plus dollars deal with Putin on energy. I'm like, what,
Speaker 1: why are we allowing that to happen? We do need
Speaker 1: to figure out a way because obviously proximity comes into
Speaker 1: geography comes into a more proximity than anything else. How
Speaker 1: do we get our natural gas, how do we get
Speaker 1: our oil to our European allies? And how do we
Speaker 1: undercut putin? You know what, guess what, we start doing
Speaker 1: that and he gets weakened dramatically. That's the lifeblood of
Speaker 1: their entire economy, and that's selling it. What if he
Speaker 1: decides knowing is kind of unstable, knowing all he wants
Speaker 1: to do. He's not a reliable ally to anybody. Is
Speaker 1: that maybe a rand in Syria. Now he's trying to
Speaker 1: nudge his way into Venezuela and the chaos that's unfolding there.
Speaker 1: I want to get rid of the hostile regime Russia,
Speaker 1: the threat undercut their price, take over the market. We
Speaker 1: won't have to be begging countries in the Middle East anymore.
Speaker 1: By the way, huge important election in Israel. If you're there,
Speaker 1: you have people that you know their vote Lacud. I
Speaker 1: know there are a lot of other quote conservative far
Speaker 1: right parties, but Kut is the vote. I mean that
Speaker 1: we've never had better relations with the United States and
Speaker 1: Israel under You know, Biebie was a lone voice of
Speaker 1: moral clarity on the world stage. He is he is
Speaker 1: single handedly confronted radical Islam, and his country has been
Speaker 1: under fire, and he's done an amazing job. But you know,
Speaker 1: they they indicted him for taking a box of cigars
Speaker 1: because it's the most ridiculous thing I've ever seen, most
Speaker 1: blatantly political thing I've ever seen done, sort of like
Speaker 1: the witch hunt. Then we're gonna have no gas. We'll
Speaker 1: get rid of the combustion engine. Do you like your car? Maybe?
Speaker 1: Maybe I have a buddy of mine. I'll Actually, I
Speaker 1: have a lot of friends of mine. They love sports cars. Now,
Speaker 1: some of them like classic sports cars. One friend of
Speaker 1: mine loves this what ninety six or seven Ferrari thing,
Speaker 1: I don't know what it is, and he goes, no,
Speaker 1: all you gotta do is drive it. You're gonna love it.
Speaker 1: I drive it. I said, it's nice. I don't want
Speaker 1: to sit this load to the ground. And then another
Speaker 1: friend of mine as one of those Porsche sports card things,
Speaker 1: the Carrera I guess they call it. Yeah, it's like,
Speaker 1: you gotta drive it. Okay, I'll drive it. Don't you
Speaker 1: want one? No, not really, I really don't want one.
Speaker 1: It's not my thing. So but you could take it,
Speaker 1: say goodbye. I mean unless they come up with electric
Speaker 1: versions of them. And my favorite card, that my dream
Speaker 1: card growing up, was always a Chevy Chevelle Supersport. They
Speaker 1: come in different models. There was a square model in
Speaker 1: the more rounded model, and it comes in a convertible too.
Speaker 1: They don't make enough convertibles today. I know they have
Speaker 1: moon you know, the sunroof, moonroof whatever they call the
Speaker 1: stupid thing. And you know, but I don't even open it,
Speaker 1: so why would I. But air condition is put in
Speaker 1: the temperature you want hit on. And but we're gonna
Speaker 1: get rid of the combustion engine. We'll have a government
Speaker 1: paid for job vacation everything else. I mean, they've gone nuts.
Speaker 1: They had They want to fundamentally transform this country, and
Speaker 1: they're willing to have open borders to do it regardless.
Speaker 1: Doesn't matter how many criminal alien immigrants come in with
Speaker 1: the population that wants a better life, doesn't matter the
Speaker 1: burden the cost of the American people for healthcare and
Speaker 1: education in the criminal justice system. Forget about angel moms
Speaker 1: and dads. I mean, they're attacking Kirsten Nielsen for oh, well,
Speaker 1: she will never live down that she is the one
Speaker 1: that put children in cages. No, it was actually under
Speaker 1: hers and Trump swats that it got stopped. Notice they
Speaker 1: don't Nancy Closing Company never wanted to meet with angel
Speaker 1: moms and dads. The ones that have permanent separation in
Speaker 1: part because of oh sanctuary policies, like the state of California,
Speaker 1: the city of San Francisco. I mean said, what are
Speaker 1: the Democrats? They said that they're gonna you know, I
Speaker 1: guess it was Elizabeth Warren say, well, we can't just
Speaker 1: run anti Trump. Okay, they say that, but then all
Speaker 1: they now want his tax returns. They're never getting his
Speaker 1: tax returns. You don't get to use the IHR arrest
Speaker 1: to bludge in a political opponent. You don't. Now, if
Speaker 1: you want to change the law, go ahead, but you're
Speaker 1: not gonna again. I'm just because Gerald Nadler thinks that
Speaker 1: he can subpoena to the president's tax returns. It's not
Speaker 1: gonna happen. But that's where their head is. It's not
Speaker 1: about creating jobs or an economic economic opportunity in the country.
Speaker 1: Well Trump's done all that alone. Basically, they haven't helped
Speaker 1: ending burdensome regulations and securing our borders, keeping his promises,
Speaker 1: checking them off the list. By the way, Don Lemon
Speaker 1: says the right is obsessed with Acasio Quartez, not really.
Speaker 1: Acazio Quartez is very angry that people thought that she
Speaker 1: was using an accent at Al Sharpton's National Action Network conference.
Speaker 1: This has come up before with you know, I don't
Speaker 1: feel no ways tired and Al Gore revulging a wrong
Speaker 1: for African emergence and I mean, it's so it's just horrible.
Speaker 1: In the blory, how the large shall be revealed? Stand
Speaker 1: with me for the economic empowerment that is the next
Speaker 1: great civil rights in the frontier. In the plory, how
Speaker 1: the large shall be revealed? Don't tell me. We live
Speaker 1: in a color bland society. The Republicans know that there
Speaker 1: is the wrong agenda for African Americans. That's why they
Speaker 1: don't even want to count you in the census. But
Speaker 1: then Hillary does the same thing, and she did it
Speaker 1: again recently. I mean, for whatever before predominantly African American
Speaker 1: voices of audiences, their voices change. I don't feel no
Speaker 1: ways tired. I come too far where I started from.
Speaker 1: I haven't heard the audio of Acasio Cortez, and she
Speaker 1: is saying as much as the right wing wants to
Speaker 1: distort and deflect from the Bronx, and I act and
Speaker 1: I talk like it when I'm fired up, especially when
Speaker 1: I'm home. She said in a tweet, it's so hurtful
Speaker 1: to see you every aspect of my life is weaponized
Speaker 1: against me and complain it somehow asserted as false. At
Speaker 1: the same time, I'm a proud bartender. By the way,
Speaker 1: I have that in common. I was a really good bartender.
Speaker 1: I had to move when I was a bartender and
Speaker 1: had a lot of money, moving really fast. But let
Speaker 1: me play it. I haven't heard it yet, Jason, do
Speaker 1: you have finally don't care? She got mad at the
Speaker 1: Daily Wire that actually said she might a broken laws.
Speaker 1: That's a problem you got Stacy Abrams saying the Georgia
Speaker 1: fetal heartbeat bill is evil. You can sense a heartbeat.
Speaker 1: The thinking in Georgia is well, maybe a heartbeat reflects
Speaker 1: real life and it ought to be protected. She says,
Speaker 1: it's evil. You know, I told you about the tax issue.
Speaker 1: Then we got oh, then you've got Democrats want Fox
Speaker 1: News to answer for why they didn't run the story
Speaker 1: about Stormy. And I've watched this back and forth with this,
Speaker 1: and there was a meat article by the guy who
Speaker 1: was one of the editors at the time. He said,
Speaker 1: I'm not going before any House committee. I'm a member
Speaker 1: of the press. You don't get to question why I
Speaker 1: make an editorial decision. And I don't think any member
Speaker 1: of the press should be questions. They don't get to
Speaker 1: tell you what stories you can again, all right, I
Speaker 1: mean it's absolutely ridiculous. Anyway, I'm gonna watch that one. Yeah,
Speaker 1: let's play a cost you. I'm proud to be a bartender.
Speaker 1: Ain't nothing wrong with that. I didn't don't. That doesn't
Speaker 1: sound bad to me, doesn't sound bad. I don't know
Speaker 1: what's I didn't get that. That's the first time I
Speaker 1: heard it. But everyone's making a big donald blame her
Speaker 1: for me. Man, I'm proud to be a bartender too.
Speaker 1: I love it. I think one of the best things
Speaker 1: that ever happened in my life is twenty years of
Speaker 1: real work. It just keeps you grounded. I don't I've
Speaker 1: said many times I don't think fame is healthy at all,
Speaker 1: and nobody wants to hear that. So you got this
Speaker 1: new I don't even know who this person is that
Speaker 1: the media is going all crazy about this Buddha judge.
Speaker 1: I guess he's the mayor in South Bend, Indiana. You
Speaker 1: know he's going after Mike Pence, you know. And then
Speaker 1: you got an MSNBC I don't know somebody. They're saying
Speaker 1: that he represents the seen it as a real threat
Speaker 1: to Kamala Harris and other diverse candidates seeking the Democratic
Speaker 1: presidential nomination because he's coming under attack by the mainstream
Speaker 1: media's diversity crowd or whatever. But there was a whole segment,
Speaker 1: I guess on MSNBC, the crying which he was being
Speaker 1: framed as an extensive attention to the Bidens, the Bernies,
Speaker 1: the Bedos, and the Buddha judge. I say his name, right,
Speaker 1: I don't know a whole lot about him except he's
Speaker 1: thirty seven or a South Bend and he's running for
Speaker 1: president as a Democratic candidate. Okay, when he gets you know,
Speaker 1: some notoriety, maybe we'll pay attention to him. Biden, by
Speaker 1: the ways, in trouble in Iowa, East Emerson Pole, Iowa voters,
Speaker 1: Biden's neck and neck with Bernie. Bernie now seems to
Speaker 1: have prevailed as the front runner in this race. And they,
Speaker 1: you know, as a great article by Byron York face it,
Speaker 1: Biden and Bernie are too old to be president. They
Speaker 1: don't have the energy of Trump. I can tell you
Speaker 1: that pathetic Democrats have become the party of apologies. That
Speaker 1: was in the New York Post. There was a face off. Now,
Speaker 1: it was interesting to watch Robert Francis Beto Bozo. He
Speaker 1: showed up at a town hall and there were literally
Speaker 1: it was like a third of the way full. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I'm not making that up. I want to remind you too.
Speaker 1: If you're an unhappy time share owner, you went on
Speaker 1: a vacation you have in the time of your life.
Speaker 1: Somebody says you can duplicate this every year for the
Speaker 1: rest of your life and never end up going back.
Speaker 1: And then you realize there are other nice places I
Speaker 1: could go too, and I could better use that money.
Speaker 1: But every year you got to pay the maintenance fees
Speaker 1: and whatever other fees associated with it. You wish you
Speaker 1: never did it. Well, there's a way out. Thanks to
Speaker 1: my friends at lone Star Transfer, Brian and Karen. They
Speaker 1: run a family owned business. They will make sure that
Speaker 1: your experience is a pleasant one. They will get you
Speaker 1: out of your time share legally, ethically and quickly. I
Speaker 1: have an eight plus ratiing with a better business Bureau
Speaker 1: and this is what they do. Don't let another year
Speaker 1: go by and you're paying all this money for a
Speaker 1: timeshare you're never gonna use now. Two ways to get
Speaker 1: them online at lone star transfer dot com. All right,
Speaker 1: or give my friends a call no obligation called pound
Speaker 1: two fifty on your mobile keyword time share. Just hit
Speaker 1: pound two fifty on your mobile phone say the keyword timeshare,
Speaker 1: or just go to Lonestar transfer dot com. By the way,
Speaker 1: you do you now believe that it's a crisis at
Speaker 1: the border. Does everybody now believe? Does anyone have any doubt?
Speaker 1: Watching the largest, the biggest caravan to date headed right
Speaker 1: to the US. You know, even Obama is saying you
Speaker 1: better stop with the stop with the identity politics. I'm
Speaker 1: worried about the progressives of my own party now. One
Speaker 1: of the biggest problems we have is the system now
Speaker 1: is so overwhelmed that people can just come in claim asylum.
Speaker 1: They got a court date down the road, but we
Speaker 1: know that ninety five percent of them are never going
Speaker 1: to show up for their court date. And so now
Speaker 1: it's become oh okay, it's you get across the border,
Speaker 1: you're basically in unless you get caught. And if it's
Speaker 1: a sanctuary city or state, you commit a crime, you
Speaker 1: get out of jail, they'll aid and to bet you
Speaker 1: to commit more crimes. All right, we got New king
Speaker 1: Ridge coming up and John Solomon breaking news on Ukrainian
Speaker 1: officials trying to influence the twenty sixteen election. Next, think,
Speaker 1: what we're talking about here is the difference between conduct
Speaker 1: that rises to the level of criminality and conduct that
Speaker 1: is deeply unethical, unpatriotic, and corrupt that may not be criminal.
Speaker 1: And I think you saw from mister mulvaaney on your
Speaker 1: show last week, and indeed we see from mister Noonez
Speaker 1: and mister McCarthy an attitude that ethics don't matter. If
Speaker 1: there's no crime, there's no foul, And I think if
Speaker 1: we get to that point in this country, then we
Speaker 1: are in a very desperate situation. But there was in
Speaker 1: plain sight open collusion with the Russians when the president's
Speaker 1: son and campaign manager and son in law go to
Speaker 1: a meeting with the Russians to receive quote dirt on
Speaker 1: Hillary as part of the Russian government's attempt to help
Speaker 1: the Trump campaign, and that was in the email invited
Speaker 1: them to the writing. They go to the meeting, they said,
Speaker 1: you want that information. That is collusion. Whether it's criminal
Speaker 1: conspiracy is another question as of right now is this
Speaker 1: may not be all of them, but this cleans up
Speaker 1: quite a bit. We have eight referrals that we are
Speaker 1: prepared to send over to the Attorney General this week.
Speaker 1: So I would say that, first of all, all of
Speaker 1: these are classified or sensitive, and so because they a
Speaker 1: lot of them could contain sensitive classified information. Five of
Speaker 1: them or what I would call straight up referrals, so
Speaker 1: just referrals that are that name someone and name the
Speaker 1: specific crimes. Those crimes are lying to Congress, misleading congress,
Speaker 1: leaking classified information. So five of them are are those types.
Speaker 1: There are three that I think are more complicated. So
Speaker 1: you mentioned conspiracy. So the question on conspiracy is is
Speaker 1: what you know? There's the conspiracy statute, and then what
Speaker 1: are they what do they need to look at into
Speaker 1: that statute? All right, glad you well those hour two
Speaker 1: Sean Hannity show right down outull free telephone number. It's
Speaker 1: eight hundred ninety for one sewn you want to be
Speaker 1: a part of this program. First, of course you're hearing
Speaker 1: from the cowardly shift and Naddler. I mean, these guys
Speaker 1: just well, it's it's not a matter of criminal, it's
Speaker 1: but it's it's bad. It's still bad no matter what
Speaker 1: it is bad. We don't know what it is. But well,
Speaker 1: if there's no underlying crime, you just throw out the
Speaker 1: words unpatriotic, We know the meeting was a trump tower
Speaker 1: about the Magnitsky Act. That's what we know. And we
Speaker 1: know that everybody thought it was a colossal waste of time.
Speaker 1: And we know that Fusion GPS met both before and
Speaker 1: afterwards with the Russian woman who went in there under
Speaker 1: false pretenses anyway, but nobody seemed to care there was
Speaker 1: a Russian dassier. I mean, it's just like, for example,
Speaker 1: you know, Democrats are hoping, well, the bar and Rosenstein,
Speaker 1: they decided that there's no obstruction. Mother didn't make a
Speaker 1: decision on that. He just presented the facts to the
Speaker 1: Department of Justice, which, by the way, is what the
Speaker 1: Democrats wanted after the Clinton impeachment. Put that aside. Do
Speaker 1: Democrats really care about obstruction of justice? When none of
Speaker 1: them ever talk about, oh, the leading subpoena at emails,
Speaker 1: thirty three thousand of them acid washing your hard drive
Speaker 1: with bleach pit, busting up your devices with hammers, and
Speaker 1: removing simcards. It's not about that. It's just like they
Speaker 1: don't care about the issue of women in potential sexual assault. Otherwise,
Speaker 1: what they were doing to Justice Kavanaugh, they would now
Speaker 1: be doing to the Virginia Lieutenant governor and that none
Speaker 1: of that is happening. If they cared about walls and
Speaker 1: Dreamers and dhaka and furloughed employees like they did in
Speaker 1: the second term of Obama, they would have been out
Speaker 1: there supporting President Trump. But they don't want that either.
Speaker 1: So we have a great hypocrisy. Now, another question is
Speaker 1: now that we know an FBI investigation has shown this.
Speaker 1: Two congressional investigations, the House Intel Committee, Bipartisan Senate Committee,
Speaker 1: and now the Muller Report have unequivocally said no Russia illusion,
Speaker 1: no evidence of collusion, and it's gone on this these
Speaker 1: tinfoil had conspiracy theories, all these anonymous sources, none of
Speaker 1: it turns out to be true. First thing I would
Speaker 1: say is why weren't you interested in the phony Clinton
Speaker 1: bought and paid for Russian dossier that we know was
Speaker 1: used to bludge in the Trump campaign to influence the
Speaker 1: outcome of the twenty sixteen election. All of this is
Speaker 1: now coming home. This is not far now from really
Speaker 1: being exposed for what it is in terms of those responsible,
Speaker 1: those being held accountable, as we've promised you. Now, Devin Newness,
Speaker 1: he'll be on TV tonight. He's gonna make criminal referrals
Speaker 1: as it relates to he's going to send him to
Speaker 1: the DOJ for conspiracy leaking classified information. It only matters,
Speaker 1: I guess to the left if General Flynn does that,
Speaker 1: or if Michael Kohne lies to Congress or General Flynn
Speaker 1: lies to the FBI, even though that in thinkiled. So
Speaker 1: that is coming this week. Here's another example. Now, did
Speaker 1: they really care about the outside influence of the bad
Speaker 1: actor Putin and the hostile regime Russia? Because John Solomon
Speaker 1: now has taken his article about real evidence of the
Speaker 1: Ukrainians trying to influence the election. The headline of his
Speaker 1: new piece and his investigative report in the Hill. Hill
Speaker 1: dot Com is Ukrainian Ukrainian to US prosecutors, why don't
Speaker 1: you want our evidence on Democrats? John Solomon joins us
Speaker 1: now with all the details in this How are you, sir?
Speaker 1: I'm doing well, all right. So I think there's a
Speaker 1: huge double standard as it relates to obstruction, huge double
Speaker 1: standard as it relates to allegations of sexual assault, same
Speaker 1: with building border walls, but also as it relates to collusion.
Speaker 1: You know, it is so amazing. I was listening to
Speaker 1: Adam Schiff's interview on Sunday and his whole collusion theory
Speaker 1: has collapsed. Now to the Tower meeting, and let's just
Speaker 1: think about the Tower meeting. We know the Democrats did
Speaker 1: in the Tower meeting, an unsolicited meeting that came in
Speaker 1: over the transult they met with the woman, never followed
Speaker 1: up whether she said she had dirt on Hillary Clinton,
Speaker 1: than never got it. The Democrats hired a foreigner, Christopher Steele,
Speaker 1: and paid him to go meet with foreigners, including a
Speaker 1: Russian intelligence agent, to affirmatively fine dirt on Donald Trump.
Speaker 1: That's a proactive action as opposed to the passive action.
Speaker 1: There's far more evidence of collusion on the Democrat side
Speaker 1: than what now the Democrats are claiming on the Russia side,
Speaker 1: now that all of this and the Republican side, now
Speaker 1: that it has all collapsed. Here's what we know about Ukraine.
Speaker 1: It's so important to focus on what the Ukrainians are
Speaker 1: actually saying. They are saying they have a videotape of
Speaker 1: the head of their FBI, the NABU, admitting he tried
Speaker 1: to influence the election to help Hillary Clinton win by
Speaker 1: leaking some documents on Paul maniform. They have Alfid David's
Speaker 1: from two senior government officials admitting that they work in
Speaker 1: concert to try to help Hillary Clinton win the election.
Speaker 1: They have three million dollars changing hands at twenty fifteen
Speaker 1: and sixteen to Joe Biden's son. They have correspondence showing
Speaker 1: both the State Department of the the U s MBC CAB
Speaker 1: we're interfering or applying pressure to stop Ukrainian authorities from
Speaker 1: pursuing some of these allegations. And this is the new
Speaker 1: one that I have today. There are contacts between democratic
Speaker 1: figures in Washington and Ukrainian government officials, some of those
Speaker 1: through the embassy in Washington, that were designed to pass
Speaker 1: along dirt on Donald Trump. That's a lot of collusion,
Speaker 1: a lot more than what Bob Muller found on the
Speaker 1: rush of the Republican side. Well, I mean this is
Speaker 1: all out here and now available for everybody to see.
Speaker 1: And I think the details of your article are pretty stunning.
Speaker 1: And I think that you know, when you have Ukrainian
Speaker 1: to US prosecutors, why don't you want our evidence? Yeah,
Speaker 1: I think it's pretty clear. Let's say that they do
Speaker 1: get the evidence, I mean, where are they going to
Speaker 1: hand it over to the Attorney General or that's a
Speaker 1: great question. They've tried to do that. So, starting last fall,
Speaker 1: the Ukrainians sought a visa from the Usmbassy in keV
Speaker 1: to come here, and the prosecutors were not granted their visa.
Speaker 1: They weren't rejected, they just weren't given it, which meant
Speaker 1: they couldn't travel and deliver the information directly. So then
Speaker 1: they hired an intermediary, a former US attorney who worked
Speaker 1: in the George W. Bush administration, to go to the
Speaker 1: Southern District of New York for at the same place
Speaker 1: where the Michael Cohen investigation is currently wrapping up, and
Speaker 1: he brought an entire document of here are the allegations
Speaker 1: that they have and the evidence they could provide, would
Speaker 1: you be interested. They delivered that last October, never heard back.
Speaker 1: More recently, the Ukrainians talked to Rudy Giuliani, the President's attorney.
Speaker 1: He was in Ukraine because he has his own concerns
Speaker 1: as a member of the Trump legal team about what
Speaker 1: was going on there, whether Ukraine dug up some of
Speaker 1: the bogus dirt on Donald Trump. And he told the
Speaker 1: same thing again that there's a lot of evidence over here,
Speaker 1: for some reason, the Trump doesn't seem to be interested
Speaker 1: in so three overtures in less than six months, and
Speaker 1: yet none of this evidence says yet to change hands.
Speaker 1: And I think either someone in Congress is going to
Speaker 1: have to go over to Ukraine or the new Attorney
Speaker 1: General has to get brief down this and make a
Speaker 1: phone call to his counterpart, mister Lusenko, who was more
Speaker 1: than glad to talk to me on the record and
Speaker 1: give me the evidence and see if they can have
Speaker 1: a conversation between two attorneys general. It seems like, you know,
Speaker 1: we actually have real evidence in this case. You have
Speaker 1: sworn statements from Ukrainian officials admitting that their agency tried
Speaker 1: to influence the twenty sixteen US election in favor of
Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton. And you know, it just shows you what
Speaker 1: I've been saying, I mean on all of these issues
Speaker 1: straight on down the line. What do we know? We
Speaker 1: know one thing, the Democrats have one standard for Republicans
Speaker 1: and another standard for everyone else. You know, the contacts
Speaker 1: between the Democratic figures in DC, these Ukrainian officials, you know,
Speaker 1: passing along dirt on Donald Trump. I thought we I
Speaker 1: thought that's what the whole mother thing was supposed to
Speaker 1: be about did they collude, you know, who was doing
Speaker 1: this financial record showing a natural gas company in Ukraine
Speaker 1: and Ukraine routing three million dollars to American accounts tied
Speaker 1: to Vice President Biden's son. I mean, yeah, Add that
Speaker 1: to the issue he has with China flying on Air
Speaker 1: Force two and again millions of dollars involved and a
Speaker 1: deal while his father is in China as beyond the
Speaker 1: pale to me. And then we as we have the
Speaker 1: tape of Biden ragging about firing the prosecutor that was
Speaker 1: investigating his own son. It's remarkable. And you know I
Speaker 1: talked to earlier. We talked about the interview with mister Lusenko,
Speaker 1: who's the Attorney general of Ukraine. I interviewed one of
Speaker 1: his deputies last week, a guy named Kulik, Constantine Kulik,
Speaker 1: and he said, listen, we have evidence that when the Ukrainians,
Speaker 1: our own officials leaked the Paul Manafort documents to try
Speaker 1: to hurt Donald Trump and help Hillary Clinton, they redacted
Speaker 1: or removed from the documents they were giving to the
Speaker 1: New York Times, Washington Post and others information about a
Speaker 1: prominent Democrat. They hit a prominent Democrat's own complicity in
Speaker 1: certain things, and he said that just goes to the
Speaker 1: heart of what was going on in our own soil.
Speaker 1: There were Ukrainians trying to pick Hillary Clinton over over
Speaker 1: Donald Trump and using their official government resources in Ukraine
Speaker 1: to tip the scales in favor of Hillary Clinton. You
Speaker 1: don't see that reported anywhere except in The Hill and
Speaker 1: in a few other places Fox News, and that's it.
Speaker 1: But there is pretty significant evidence a court ruling AffA
Speaker 1: David's of audiotape that would help prove right away that
Speaker 1: a foreign power was involved in one of the questions
Speaker 1: I have, did Hillary Clinton's campaign and did the Democratic
Speaker 1: National Committee have contacts that the Ukrainian embassy in Washington
Speaker 1: was at a strategic coordination point for some of this assistance.
Speaker 1: The Ukrainians are telling me it was. We should find
Speaker 1: out from the Clintons and the DNC whether it was
Speaker 1: all right. So Devia Newness is going to release at
Speaker 1: least eight criminal referrals. It may be the beginning of
Speaker 1: a cascade of of criminal referrals. And what's interesting about
Speaker 1: it is he intends to send it to the DOJ
Speaker 1: this week for conspiracy leaking. A lot of this too.
Speaker 1: A lot of people seem to have forgotten that Michael
Speaker 1: Horowitz is still investigating the FISA court and the dossier issue.
Speaker 1: And I don't know what John Hoober's doing. What do
Speaker 1: you know. I can't find any sense. I wonder if
Speaker 1: he's in the witness protection program. Can't find any evidence
Speaker 1: he's been really doing any major investigative work on this. Well,
Speaker 1: I mean well, I mean the evidence is overwhelming and
Speaker 1: incontrovertible on FISA. I mean, we have the bulk of
Speaker 1: the information being the Hillary bought and paid for Russian dossier.
Speaker 1: They can't verify the dossier because its author doesn't authenticated himself,
Speaker 1: has no idea if it's true. So wouldn't that mean
Speaker 1: that everybody that signed it committed it will full fraud
Speaker 1: against the court. All of them were warned by Bruce
Speaker 1: or in August of twenty sixteen. Yeah, and keep in mind,
Speaker 1: we have a pretty significant body of evidence my columns
Speaker 1: and other places now where you can see that they
Speaker 1: actually failed to tell the court about evidence of innocence,
Speaker 1: things about Papadopolis and Carter Page that would have proved
Speaker 1: that they were innocent of the charges that the FBI
Speaker 1: wanted to monitor them on. It's a really extraordinary abuse.
Speaker 1: And it's amazing to me that one the Court hasn't
Speaker 1: done more publicly to raise questions, or that the DOJ
Speaker 1: hasn't held anyone accountable yet. But I think there's another
Speaker 1: important thing that Devin Junia said on television I say
Speaker 1: caught my ear. He said he sees a sprawling leaking conspiracy,
Speaker 1: meaning intelligence came in, it was distributed to a small
Speaker 1: number of people, and then leaks began to occur designed
Speaker 1: to further the narrative for the FIE them. If US
Speaker 1: officials were involved in leaking to create evidence so that
Speaker 1: they could further a FI so that they knew was
Speaker 1: on shaking ground, you would have a major criminal case.
Speaker 1: And I believe part of what Devin Nuniz is referral
Speaker 1: will likely deal with is this leaking campaign. He said
Speaker 1: so on Maria bartoom esterday, and I think, well to
Speaker 1: keep our eye on that one. That the leaking may
Speaker 1: have been more than just a image Donald Trump. It
Speaker 1: may also been designed to create false evidence for the
Speaker 1: fight application. Unbelievable work again, John Solomon of the Hill,
Speaker 1: He'll be on Hannity tonight. We'll update this story. I
Speaker 1: have a funny feeling. Just pay attention in the days, weeks,
Speaker 1: months ahead. You're gonna see a lot of movement on this.
Speaker 1: Thank you, all right, eight hundred nine four one, Sean
Speaker 1: Tolfrey telephone number. When we come back, a look at
Speaker 1: the economy. It has never been better. Steve Moore will
Speaker 1: join us. Also, New Gingrich checks in with us and
Speaker 1: our news round up information overload. As we continue, I
Speaker 1: may shut it down at some point, but I'd rather
Speaker 1: do tariff. So back to go, I have to say,
Speaker 1: has been very, very good. You know that over the
Speaker 1: last four days since I talked about shutting down the border.
Speaker 1: If they continue that everything will be fine. If they don't,
Speaker 1: we're going to tariff their cars at twenty five percent
Speaker 1: coming into the United States. So every time they make
Speaker 1: a car, it's a twenty five percent tariffs. That means
Speaker 1: we make money as opposed to lose money. We probably
Speaker 1: bring those car companies back into the United States. But
Speaker 1: if on the other hand, it doesn't work, which did
Speaker 1: will one hundred percent, the tariffs will work, just like
Speaker 1: they've worked with steel are steel industry is so hot
Speaker 1: right now because of what I did with tariffs. Same
Speaker 1: thing with aluminum. They'll work. But if it didn't work,
Speaker 1: I will close the border. I also am looking at
Speaker 1: an economic penalty for all of the drugs that are
Speaker 1: coming in through the southern border and killing our payball.
Speaker 1: The economic numbers just came out. They're very, very good.
Speaker 1: Our country's doing unbelievably well economically. Most of you don't
Speaker 1: report that because it doesn't sound good from your perspective,
Speaker 1: but the country's doing really, really well. We have a
Speaker 1: lot of very exciting things going on. A lot of
Speaker 1: companies will be announcing shortly they're moving back into the
Speaker 1: United States. They're all coming back. They want to be
Speaker 1: where the action is. I'm heading to the border. We're
Speaker 1: building a lot of are We're gonna show you a
Speaker 1: sexon and a lot of things happening. A lot of
Speaker 1: very positive things happen. Oh, good news for the country,
Speaker 1: bad news for Democrats, bad news for twenty twenty candidates.
Speaker 1: Twenty four till the top of the hour, the big
Speaker 1: story is, you know, everyone's talking about creepy, crazy Uncle
Speaker 1: Joe Biden and all of the new Green Deal and
Speaker 1: the wealth tax and the ninety percent top corporate marginal
Speaker 1: rate seventy percent top marginal rate for individuals, and everything
Speaker 1: will be free, free, free, free will eliminate the lifeblood
Speaker 1: of our economy, oil and gas, which we now are
Speaker 1: for the first time in seventy plus years, energy independent
Speaker 1: and a net exporter of energy. And it's only the beginning,
Speaker 1: as we have two pipelines online now ready to go.
Speaker 1: That means literally hundreds of thousands to millions of high
Speaker 1: paying jobs. Once we really begin to tap into the
Speaker 1: very deep resources of natural gas and energy and oil
Speaker 1: and clean burning coal that we have in the United States.
Speaker 1: Then also people forget the oil at Anoir that now
Speaker 1: has all obstacles have been removed. Oil companies will be
Speaker 1: moving in, and again they're going to be hundreds of
Speaker 1: thousands of new, high paying career jobs for our fellow Americans.
Speaker 1: Assuming the world doesn't end in twelve years, assuming the
Speaker 1: New Green Deal is just this bizarre fantasy being bantered about,
Speaker 1: assuming the wealth tax does not come into play, or
Speaker 1: those marginal rates that I just mentioned. Yeah, the President
Speaker 1: is exactly right on the economy. We've had great economic
Speaker 1: news now for a couple of days. You know, the
Speaker 1: people that are benefiting the most, the people that I
Speaker 1: cared the most about in twenty sixteen. The forgotten men
Speaker 1: and women of America and blue collar workers are enjoying
Speaker 1: wage hikes more so than at any other point in
Speaker 1: the past fifteen years. The people that have been benefiting
Speaker 1: the most from the President's deregulation and the biggest tax
Speaker 1: cut in history. That's right, those that were in poverty
Speaker 1: on food stamps under Obama, millions have left those roles.
Speaker 1: And when you look at the numbers, you see, oh,
Speaker 1: another two hundred thousand jobs created in March, as we
Speaker 1: move now closer to the creation of six million new
Speaker 1: jobs in America. May sound like a small deal, but
Speaker 1: I'll take it Sears. After years of closures, they are
Speaker 1: now beginning to open a more well, smaller, more concise
Speaker 1: stores around the country a lot if it's going to
Speaker 1: be focused on their tools, craftsmen and Ken Moore, their
Speaker 1: washers and dryers and other appliances, and that means more
Speaker 1: jobs for people. Also. Steve Moore is with us, author
Speaker 1: of trump Anomics, The Inside Inside the America First Plan
Speaker 1: to Revive our Economy, senior fellow at the Heritage Foundation,
Speaker 1: and I understand that you will apparently be moving to
Speaker 1: the federal Reserve Board on some other name I heard
Speaker 1: as Herman Kane. Hi Shan. How cool is that that
Speaker 1: the Herman Kane has now been nominated as well. So
Speaker 1: we will be I think, quite a team over there.
Speaker 1: And you know, by the way, everything you said on
Speaker 1: the economy is so spot on, and I am so
Speaker 1: proud of this president. I was privileged to work as
Speaker 1: a senior economic advisor to Donald Trump, and one of
Speaker 1: the one of the claims about me that the left
Speaker 1: is making as well, he's going to be too loyal
Speaker 1: to Trump and stuck. There were things I disagree with
Speaker 1: Donald Trump about beause you gotta of what this guy
Speaker 1: has done for the economy. I saw the President two
Speaker 1: weeks ago and I just said him, only half jokingly.
Speaker 1: I said, mister President, you have to stop creating so
Speaker 1: many jobs. We don't have enough workers to create to
Speaker 1: fill all these jobs. And that job's report that came
Speaker 1: out today is a blockbuster. And I'm going to give
Speaker 1: you one statistic, Sean that is just blows me away.
Speaker 1: I don't know if it blows you away. Seven point
Speaker 1: six millions after the number of unbuild jobs in the
Speaker 1: American economy. That's the surf plus number of jobs that's
Speaker 1: that's bigger than the entire population of Indiana. You know
Speaker 1: what's amazing about this because I knew. One statistic that
Speaker 1: I've been thrown around is we have a million more
Speaker 1: jobs at least available than we actually have people on unemployment.
Speaker 1: So it almost brings you to the point of full employment.
Speaker 1: You know, forget the records. I mean, you know it's
Speaker 1: amazing that you get. I'll debate liberals sometimes and I'll Sarah, well,
Speaker 1: this is Obama's eight ear record. He had thirteen million
Speaker 1: more Americans on food stamps, eight million more in poverty.
Speaker 1: And by the crazy Uncle Joe, creepy Uncle Joe's going
Speaker 1: to have to run on this if he gets the nomination.
Speaker 1: The lowest labor participation rate since the seventy's, worst recovery
Speaker 1: since the forty's, lowest home ownership rate in fifty one years.
Speaker 1: He took on more debt than all forty three presidents
Speaker 1: before him combined, and the only president never to reach
Speaker 1: three percent GDP growth in his entire two year term. Ever,
Speaker 1: and you know, when you look at those number, all
Speaker 1: they say, well, he inherited a bad economy. I'm like,
Speaker 1: seven years ago, I mean, he had time to fix
Speaker 1: all of this, but he made everything worse. But well
Speaker 1: put and you know, I like to site none other
Speaker 1: than Barack Obama himself, who I think it was about
Speaker 1: a month before the twenty sixteen election. You remember that,
Speaker 1: I know you played on the air where Obama says, well,
Speaker 1: how is Trump going to create all these jobs? How
Speaker 1: is he going to bring manufacturing construction back with a
Speaker 1: magic wand? Well, I think this president must have a
Speaker 1: magic wand because you're another statistic for you, John, since
Speaker 1: the election of Donald Trump, the United States has created
Speaker 1: one million manufacturing, construction and mining jobs. And it's like
Speaker 1: a U turn. They were following and then Trump's come
Speaker 1: in and they're all back big time. Well, I mean,
Speaker 1: those are the jobs again, that's the forgotten men and
Speaker 1: women in this country. Exactly. One of the things that
Speaker 1: I really think the president doesn't get credit for. He
Speaker 1: doesn't allow these companies to leave without getting on a
Speaker 1: phone and saying, why would you consider leaving this great country?
Speaker 1: What is the obstacle that exists within government that would
Speaker 1: incentivize you to leave now? And a lot of the companies,
Speaker 1: I guess it all started a carrier Air conditioner. You know,
Speaker 1: they left, but now they're all coming back there. When
Speaker 1: the companies now are able to repatriate their money is
Speaker 1: back to America. What is the percent on that around
Speaker 1: ten percent? Yeah, yeah, And the latest estimate is a
Speaker 1: little under one trillion. That one billion, one trillion dollars
Speaker 1: has been brought back to the United States in just
Speaker 1: the last about a year and a half. And by
Speaker 1: the way, and that continues, there's no time limit on
Speaker 1: the amount of time companies can, you know, pick up
Speaker 1: the companies that left America. They can come back. It's
Speaker 1: going to keep streaming in. It's gonna keep streaming. And
Speaker 1: like the tax cut has had a lot to do
Speaker 1: with this. We wanted but we were unapologetically pro American business.
Speaker 1: We wanted businesses to succeed. We wanted to make them
Speaker 1: competitive in the world, because if you don't have healthy businesses,
Speaker 1: you can't help healthy jobs. Maybe the thing I'm most
Speaker 1: proud of I think the President probably we would share this,
Speaker 1: you know, this thought is that the wages are growing,
Speaker 1: I mean and not just wages for high income people.
Speaker 1: In fact, the Wall Street Journal had an amazing report
Speaker 1: a couple of weeks ago Shan that the highest wage
Speaker 1: gains have been for the lowest income and lowest skilled workers.
Speaker 1: That's what happens when you create a tight labor market. Well,
Speaker 1: you know the thing is is and then I look
Speaker 1: at these proposals. If there's you tell me, if there's
Speaker 1: a ninety percent top corporate marginal tax rate and a
Speaker 1: seventy percent individual marginal tax rate, tell me, you know.
Speaker 1: To me, if you want to know what's going to happen,
Speaker 1: just look at New York, California, Illinois, and New Jersey
Speaker 1: where there is now been and continues a mass exodus
Speaker 1: of people with money that have their businesses and they're
Speaker 1: leaving in droves. And you look at the population increases
Speaker 1: in places like Florida, in Texas, Tennessee, the Carolinas. They're
Speaker 1: leaving for these states, which by the way, also offer
Speaker 1: better weather and right, but there's no they don't have
Speaker 1: the burdensome regulation nor the high taxation to deal with,
Speaker 1: and it is incentivizing all of them to leave and
Speaker 1: they're leaving. Well, that's exactly right there. I just wrote
Speaker 1: a column called the four States of the Apocalypse, and
Speaker 1: I'll bet you can guess which four of those are
Speaker 1: it's New York, New Jersey, Connecticut, and my home state
Speaker 1: of Illinois. Those are totally Democratic dominated states with very
Speaker 1: liberal policies, high tax rates, you know, high regulations, you know,
Speaker 1: forced union rules. And those states are in a state
Speaker 1: of financial collapse. You know, when I go to Florida
Speaker 1: and Texas, all I see is license plates from Connecticut,
Speaker 1: in Illinois and New Jersey. Well, yeah, I know, all right,
Speaker 1: So let's talk about now, we had the historic low
Speaker 1: rates from the FED and no increases barely during the
Speaker 1: Obama years. Correct, the rates were very low under under Obama.
Speaker 1: And you know, my concern is that the Trump you know,
Speaker 1: the reason I caught complete lately is because I was
Speaker 1: very critical as Donald Trump, was that the FED was
Speaker 1: raising interest rates at a time when we had high employment,
Speaker 1: you know, the best labor force market in fifty years. Uh,
Speaker 1: you know, high growth four percent last summer and no inflation.
Speaker 1: And I just couldn't understand why that would start raising
Speaker 1: rates when everything is going so well for the American economy.
Speaker 1: And and I've taken some plaque from that, but that's
Speaker 1: where I stand. I want stable prices, but I don't
Speaker 1: see when you don't have any unemployment. You've got a
Speaker 1: booming economy. Why why disrupt that that picture? You know, Look,
Speaker 1: America has done well with to me, they do it.
Speaker 1: It's almost like the FED was helping President Obama politically,
Speaker 1: and then it almost seems like, oh, Trump's president, what
Speaker 1: do we care if it impacts the economy. That's the
Speaker 1: feeling I got, am I wrong? I There's there may
Speaker 1: be some truth to that, but the point is, Look,
Speaker 1: we have had actually slight deplace right now. I mean,
Speaker 1: show me anywhere prices are rising, and I guarantee you
Speaker 1: talk to farmers, you talk to the people in their
Speaker 1: old patch. They don't see any inflation. They see their
Speaker 1: prices falling. So you know, I'm for stable prices. I
Speaker 1: think that's the best the FED can do, and for
Speaker 1: high growth. And when I get over there to the FEDS,
Speaker 1: I want to be the growth hawks, the guy who
Speaker 1: believes as Trump. You know, we used to tell Trump
Speaker 1: Larry cob and I, you know, sir, we think we
Speaker 1: can get into three to four percent growth rate with
Speaker 1: the right policies, and Trump the over optimist, which put
Speaker 1: it press. I want growth. You know, I don't know
Speaker 1: we can get the five but you know, you said it.
Speaker 1: Obama never got the three percent growth in eight years
Speaker 1: in office, and here Trump is in the second year.
Speaker 1: We got three percent growth. Unbelievable. All right, stay right there,
Speaker 1: Steve Moore, Uh he along with Herman Kine. There should
Speaker 1: be a major shift now at the FED, and that
Speaker 1: would be good news for the economy. It turns out
Speaker 1: that the current FED Chairman, Jerome Powell is uh. Well,
Speaker 1: there are people that have, let's say, policies that I
Speaker 1: don't think are conducive to the economic growth that America
Speaker 1: can possibly have. Low interest rates for me mean, oh
Speaker 1: people can buy their first home. That means that oh,
Speaker 1: older people can refinance their homes at a lower rate
Speaker 1: and save money every month and stay in the home
Speaker 1: that they love. Quick break right back, We'll continue right
Speaker 1: as we continue. Steve Moore, author of Trumponomics, Inside the
Speaker 1: America First Plan to Revive our Economy, senior fellow at
Speaker 1: the Heritage Foundation, and also here to set the record
Speaker 1: straight about all these attacks against him surrounding your personal life, taxes, etc. Etc.
Speaker 1: I Mean, I've known you all these years. I just
Speaker 1: hate to even go down this road because I see
Speaker 1: it and you know, for total political bas but you
Speaker 1: know it's part of the you know, it's part of
Speaker 1: the way thing goes, Things going Washington. Yeah, what's going
Speaker 1: on here, Sean is that you know, I have a
Speaker 1: long record. You and I have known each other for many,
Speaker 1: many years, and you know I'm a staunch free market
Speaker 1: economic guy who believes in lower taxes and less regulation.
Speaker 1: And that's not where the left is. And they've really
Speaker 1: made they have seven full time reporters, investigative reporters after
Speaker 1: me looking at every aspect of my life. You know,
Speaker 1: the girls I dated in high school, and you know,
Speaker 1: all of these things, and you know, they went in
Speaker 1: a very hyeah and I thought it an incredibly underhanded
Speaker 1: and squirreless way. They looked at my divorce record, and
Speaker 1: you know it was, what does my divorce ten years
Speaker 1: ago have to do with my qualifications for the past?
Speaker 1: And it's fifty five percent of the population. It's ridiculous.
Speaker 1: Steve Moore, though, listen, I'm sorry you have to go
Speaker 1: through all that. It's so typical, though, isn't it. It's
Speaker 1: just predictable typical. You know. Meanwhile, creepy uncle Joe Biden
Speaker 1: is smelling hair, rubbing noses, kissing strangers and hugging them
Speaker 1: as tightly as possible. It's weird, all right, Thank you, sir,
Speaker 1: appreciate it. Eight hundred and nine for one, Shawn, Toll
Speaker 1: free telephone number. As we continue News round Up, Information
Speaker 1: Overload hour coming up, stay right here for our final
Speaker 1: news round up and information overload. We got two million
Speaker 1: people in jail in this country, and number of them
Speaker 1: are in jail for felonies. Many states say, Okay, we're
Speaker 1: putting you away for a long period of time. You're
Speaker 1: gonna pay a heavy price for that, but also away.
Speaker 1: You're right to participate in a democratic society. You can't
Speaker 1: vote anymore. The US Israel relationship is one of the
Speaker 1: most important relationships that we have on the planet. And
Speaker 1: that relationship, if it is to be successful, must transcend
Speaker 1: partisanship in the United States, and it must be able
Speaker 1: to transcend a prime minister who is racist. All right,
Speaker 1: that was well, first Bernie, then Beto Bozo, Robert Francis O'Rourke.
Speaker 1: Excuse me. The elections in Israel are going on now
Speaker 1: live in Israel as we speak, News Round Up, Information Overload,
Speaker 1: our eight hundred and nine for one, Shawn. There has
Speaker 1: only been before President Trump, one figure on the world
Speaker 1: stage that has had a singular focus and understanding a
Speaker 1: moral clarity of evil in our time, and that of
Speaker 1: course is radical Islamis. And now with the partnership, which
Speaker 1: is the best relationship we've ever had, especially after eight
Speaker 1: years of Obama, we've ever had with Israel. We're not
Speaker 1: dropping one hundred and fifty billion dollars in cash and
Speaker 1: other currency on the tarmac for Mullah's in Iran. He
Speaker 1: has been a Churchillian figure. We're told the election is
Speaker 1: going to be close. I hope people in Israel if
Speaker 1: you hear this that you're out voting for Lakud new
Speaker 1: Gingrich as well us former Speaker of the House. How
Speaker 1: are you, sir? And by the way, Nuda's a new
Speaker 1: podcast that's out and Nuts World we call it, and
Speaker 1: it's on all Apple products and wherever you might go
Speaker 1: for a podcast. How are you. I'm doing well and
Speaker 1: I think you sort of captured men. It's a little
Speaker 1: hard to walk through the list and believe it's true.
Speaker 1: The Democrats have literally, I think, in a way, lost
Speaker 1: their head. They're just drifting into this mindless left wing,
Speaker 1: you know. In A good example is one of these
Speaker 1: are Sanders confuses. In Florida, the question was, once you
Speaker 1: have paid your price, and once you back out in society,
Speaker 1: should you be allowed to vote. Nobody in Florida voted
Speaker 1: on a referendum to let you vote while you're on
Speaker 1: a prison. But they just can't help themselves. They keep
Speaker 1: moving in a direction that is, you know, less and
Speaker 1: less rational, but sounds really good if you're a left
Speaker 1: wing fundraiser. Well, it also sounds good, I guess to people.
Speaker 1: I mean, whether you're willing or unwilling to work, you
Speaker 1: get all the benefits. And they're going to tax you
Speaker 1: at a seventy percent top marginal rate for individuals and
Speaker 1: a ninety corporate tax rate. And by the way, if
Speaker 1: you save too much money, then they're going to come
Speaker 1: back for another bide at the apple with the wealth
Speaker 1: tax that's going to pay for government childcare, according to
Speaker 1: Elizabeth Warren, and it's they're not done yet. Then when
Speaker 1: you die, they'll take more. And it's well, but let
Speaker 1: me tell you, let me tell why. This all just
Speaker 1: strikes me as I've been here before. In nineteen seventy two,
Speaker 1: George mcgovernor, who up until this year was the most
Speaker 1: radical person nominated by the Democratic Party. He came out
Speaker 1: with what was a very clever idea, which is going
Speaker 1: to be a two thousand dollars Democrat everybody get two
Speaker 1: thousand dollars, And after a couple of weeks of talking
Speaker 1: about it, it was overwhelmingly unpopular. And people, most Americans
Speaker 1: believe in the work ethics, and most Americans believe that
Speaker 1: they shouldn't be taxed so somebody down the street can
Speaker 1: avoid doing anything. And if you go out and you
Speaker 1: talk to folks in working neighborhoods, they'll tell you there
Speaker 1: are people who figure out how to get un weelfare,
Speaker 1: out to get in food sense, you know, how to
Speaker 1: read the system every way they can. And hard working
Speaker 1: Americans don't like that. They actually have a distinctly negative reaction,
Speaker 1: which is why liberals do better on college professors than
Speaker 1: they do among blue collar workers. Well, I think you're
Speaker 1: right about the instincts of Americans. But you know a
Speaker 1: great line, by the way, I don't know if you
Speaker 1: heard Andrew Cuomo. Andrew cuomos at tax the rich, Tax
Speaker 1: the rich, tax the rich. Now he's complaining that New
Speaker 1: York State has come up with a two point three
Speaker 1: billion dollars short fall this year. New York, New Jersey,
Speaker 1: California all losing population, no income tax states like Tennessee,
Speaker 1: in Florida and Texas and even the Carolinas, they're they're
Speaker 1: all gaining population Florida last year in Texas nearly four
Speaker 1: hundred thousand. Listen to Cuomo, you're gonna love this. We
Speaker 1: have one of the most progressive tax codes in the
Speaker 1: United States, which is a good thing, which means the
Speaker 1: richer you are, the more you pay. However, that presents
Speaker 1: a very fragile economy because then you are relying on
Speaker 1: a very small number of people for the vast amount
Speaker 1: of your tax dollars. One percent of the taxpayers pay
Speaker 1: nearly half of all the taxes. One percent pay nearly
Speaker 1: half of all those taxes. Was one percent are the
Speaker 1: richest people in the state. They're the richest people in
Speaker 1: the country, and they are the most mobile people in
Speaker 1: the country. And you see the chart on the bottom,
Speaker 1: top one percent about forty six percent, top five percent,
Speaker 1: sixty three percent of all the revenue, top ten percent,
Speaker 1: seventy four percent of all the revenue. Tax the rich tax,
Speaker 1: the rich tax the rich. We did now, God forbid
Speaker 1: the rich leave. They left, mister speaker, they're leaving. What
Speaker 1: happens they should? Why when the country adopts that policy,
Speaker 1: do you do it? Wait? Do you remember when when
Speaker 1: you were a child and there was this children's fairy
Speaker 1: tale about killing the goose that laid the golden egg? Right,
Speaker 1: And this is the sort of thing that was taught
Speaker 1: to people to sort of suggest to them, you know,
Speaker 1: if you've got somebody who's being that generous, maybe you
Speaker 1: should be nice to them instead of nasty. I've never heard,
Speaker 1: by the I've never heard of liberal ever before admit
Speaker 1: what percent of taxes come from the top one percent?
Speaker 1: I mean, that was an amazing moment for Clomo to
Speaker 1: admit the half of all the taxes in New York
Speaker 1: State are the top one percent. It's insane, exactly right.
Speaker 1: I mean, at what point does somebody look at their budget.
Speaker 1: I talked to a guy recently who moved out of
Speaker 1: California to Texas and with the difference just to not
Speaker 1: paying a state income tax, could buy a house in
Speaker 1: Texas had no cost to his budget. That's why they're
Speaker 1: gaining popular. People aren't stupid. And by the way, no
Speaker 1: business with the ninety percent marginal tax rate. Is that
Speaker 1: ever gonna let me build the business in the United States.
Speaker 1: They're gonna leave and they're going to take their money
Speaker 1: and their factories with them, right, And of course that's
Speaker 1: going to make I think one of the central themes
Speaker 1: of two twenty is going to be the objective fact
Speaker 1: that this president continues to create jobs, has a pretty
Speaker 1: good model for how to continue creating jobs. We have
Speaker 1: the lowest unemployment I think now since sixty nine for
Speaker 1: African Americans, the lowest unemployment for Latinos, the lowest unemployment
Speaker 1: for women, the lowest unemployment, and at some point whenever
Speaker 1: reality check and say to people today, you have a
Speaker 1: party that's putting you to work. By the way, we're
Speaker 1: also seeing wages rise faster for high school graduates than
Speaker 1: for college graduates for the first time in two generations.
Speaker 1: So you're seeing more money in your pocket. You have
Speaker 1: a job, you have a root ahead to real prosperity,
Speaker 1: or you could go with these left wing folks and
Speaker 1: decide to destroy the autonomy. And I think that'll be
Speaker 1: one of the central thematics of the campaign in twenty twenty. Well,
Speaker 1: you know a lot of challenges I honestly think it's
Speaker 1: like the greatest gift in the world that they're They've
Speaker 1: gone so far and so hard to the left, and
Speaker 1: even in the primary, I think they're even going harder left.
Speaker 1: And I don't think anyone's going to come out of
Speaker 1: that primary that is not one of these new Green
Speaker 1: Deal people, and I think that almost guarantees Trump gets
Speaker 1: a second term. Let me ask you about another issue.
Speaker 1: I know you've been following. Most people don't even know this,
Speaker 1: but China's first email and the rise of their online
Speaker 1: activities and in other words, their building of the internet.
Speaker 1: I know initially they saw the internet as a tool
Speaker 1: for scholars and scientists, but something is happening that may
Speaker 1: impact this country and our security in privacy on levels
Speaker 1: that we never imagine before. Well, I can't tell you.
Speaker 1: I'm glad, I am that you've raised this issue. The
Speaker 1: whole transition to the fifth generation was called five G,
Speaker 1: is going to be enormous. It's going to have like
Speaker 1: a thousand times of capacity of our current system, and
Speaker 1: as it's a day. According to the Defense Innovation Board
Speaker 1: report last week, the Chinese are so far ahead of
Speaker 1: us that we are in real danger for the first
Speaker 1: time of losing strategically to China and having China define
Speaker 1: the Internet of the twenty first century. And this would
Speaker 1: be catastrophic and has really been extraordinarily difficult. I've been
Speaker 1: working on this issue for months now, and to watch
Speaker 1: the AT and T CNN team just lie about it,
Speaker 1: which is what they've been doing when they've been desperately
Speaker 1: trying to stop the kind of changes we need worldwide.
Speaker 1: Right now, Huawei, which is the big Chinese company, is
Speaker 1: just cleaning our clock. We have no effective response, and
Speaker 1: the President gets it. He's trying to move the system.
Speaker 1: But between the lobbyists for AT and T and the
Speaker 1: bureaucrats who are just sort of mindlessly slow, we are.
Speaker 1: And you've known me a long time, you've never heard
Speaker 1: me be quite this direct. We are in danger of
Speaker 1: suffering a strategic defeat from which we may not recover
Speaker 1: because once the Chinese control the Internet across the planet. Oh,
Speaker 1: they can tell us, well, we're going to keep them
Speaker 1: out of the US. We'll fine. You want to do
Speaker 1: business in India, you want to do business in South Africa,
Speaker 1: you want to do business in New Zealand, You're going
Speaker 1: to be on Chinese equipment. So you know, unless we're
Speaker 1: prepared to really rethink this and launch an American offensive
Speaker 1: and do everything we can to define an American Internet,
Speaker 1: I really do believe this will be a catastrophic business.
Speaker 1: All Right. You know, look at a guy like you know,
Speaker 1: any of these big hackers out there, A lot of them,
Speaker 1: you know, are now in their forties. They were hacking
Speaker 1: into our Department of Defense, NASA, and all these agencies
Speaker 1: when they were sixteen. We still have not built up
Speaker 1: an effective defensive measure so our government can never get hacked.
Speaker 1: Forget about the average American citizen, which is important if
Speaker 1: you believe in privacy as I do. But if they're
Speaker 1: getting into our government and getting our government secrets. I mean,
Speaker 1: that's what the whole Hillary Clinton email espionage scandal was
Speaker 1: all about. We believe in Homie was about to report
Speaker 1: it that six foreign intelligence agencies hacked into that server
Speaker 1: in that Mom and pop bathroom closet. Well, then that's
Speaker 1: that's dangerous. For it was also dangerous is if you
Speaker 1: end up in a modern battleship where information matters, and
Speaker 1: the Chinese have the ability to put false information into
Speaker 1: your systems, so you don't know where you are or
Speaker 1: what you're doing, or where your equipment is. You could
Speaker 1: be defeated before you fire the first shot. And that's
Speaker 1: how serious this stuff is. And TRINITYA. My newsletter on
Speaker 1: Wednesday's going to be about the way in which the
Speaker 1: American needs me is just sold the country out. You know,
Speaker 1: you look at the coverage of that people have given
Speaker 1: to pure junk and the inability to get the New
Speaker 1: York Times, the Worship clost to others to take seriously
Speaker 1: the survival in the United States, and that'll be a
Speaker 1: big issue. I think in two thousand money, we have
Speaker 1: a president who really thinks American survival matters. You have
Speaker 1: a Democratic Party who thinks that that's all silly, that
Speaker 1: we can have open borders, weak defense and be passive
Speaker 1: in the world and betray our allies and everything will
Speaker 1: work out fine. As you point out, I couldn't help
Speaker 1: but think when you were describing the one hundred and
Speaker 1: fifty billion dollars. I mean, what if Obama had, by mistakes,
Speaker 1: sent one hundred and fifty billion dollars to Israel instead
Speaker 1: of Iran. Think how much better off would be today?
Speaker 1: What do you think of wild You know, I'm obviously
Speaker 1: concerned because now it's voting day in Israel. And you know,
Speaker 1: I look at BBS as frankly for a long time
Speaker 1: until President Trump was elected as the you know, sole
Speaker 1: single voice of moral clarity and understanding the real nature
Speaker 1: of the biggest threat in our time, which I believe
Speaker 1: is radical Aslam as we saw in nine to eleven.
Speaker 1: And but now Israel has its best partner. You know,
Speaker 1: look at Golan now is the Gallen Heights are now
Speaker 1: recognized as Israels. Uh, look at the you know, the
Speaker 1: the embassy moved to Jerusalem where belongs the capital from
Speaker 1: Tel aviv Um. And then you have people like you know,
Speaker 1: Robert Francis referring to this as uh, well, at least
Speaker 1: he's evil, And I'm like, wow, the same guy that
Speaker 1: doesn't want any walls on our southern border, by the way, right,
Speaker 1: I mean you have to ask yourself first all, what's
Speaker 1: what's the moral right of somebody who's not in danger,
Speaker 1: not at risk, is not suffering from rocket attacks, hasn't
Speaker 1: hasn't lost their brother as you know, bb lost his
Speaker 1: brother on the raider and Tebbie to rescue the people
Speaker 1: who were in the in the airline uh years ago
Speaker 1: in Uganda. Um, you know hasn't had family members who
Speaker 1: are killed in the Holocaust. I mean people of the
Speaker 1: privileged life, who are are personally wealthy, have never known hardship.
Speaker 1: When they start critics sizing, somebody whose country is very
Speaker 1: survival is always at risk. And that's what people need
Speaker 1: to remember. The Iranians are pouring missiles into South Lebanon
Speaker 1: for for Hezbollah. The Ranians have been subsidizing Hamas, which
Speaker 1: regularly fires missiles in Israel. The Syrians, if they got
Speaker 1: to go on back, would use it as a base
Speaker 1: to once again fired down on the settlers and the
Speaker 1: tourists and the farmers down around the Sea of Galilee.
Speaker 1: You know, people like Nick Beto literally have no notion
Speaker 1: how dangerous and how hard the world can be. And
Speaker 1: I think that's very dangerous. International leader, all right, Former
Speaker 1: Speaker of the House, New King Rich don't forget his
Speaker 1: podcast News World an Apple any podcast near you. Thank you,
Speaker 1: sir for being with us. We appreciate it. Eight hundred
Speaker 1: nine for one Sean Tolfree telephone number. We got an
Speaker 1: incredible Hannity tonight, including two investigative reports. We'll tell you
Speaker 1: more about that, and we're naming names tonight. Yes, who
Speaker 1: are those people that have been lying to you? Are
Speaker 1: top fifty coming up tonight, Hannity, ninet eestern quick break
Speaker 1: right back. We'll continue all right, twenty five, No until
Speaker 1: the top of the hour. You know, I'm really getting
Speaker 1: sick and tired of the lie, which is that, oh,
Speaker 1: Kirsten Nielsen is responsible for the separation of children. By
Speaker 1: the way, we're getting lectured by the people that won't
Speaker 1: meet with angel moms and dads, the people that have
Speaker 1: permanent separation. We're literally the people making that allegation are
Speaker 1: the same people that want to tear down walls, eliminate
Speaker 1: ice those you know, they don't seem to care at
Speaker 1: all about the permanent separation of four thousand homicides in
Speaker 1: a two year period, or thirty thousand sexual assaults in
Speaker 1: a two year period, or one hundred thousand violent assaults
Speaker 1: in a two year period, by yes, criminal aliens in
Speaker 1: this country? Is it the ninety eight April notes, the
Speaker 1: real families, real crime. Now, the other point of this
Speaker 1: is this is simple, where were they when Obama had
Speaker 1: the same policy? The person that fixed it was Donald J. Trump,
Speaker 1: the president the person that did not fix it or
Speaker 1: lift a finger to fix it, is there ever so
Speaker 1: beloved Barack Obama, And now they want to blame secretary.
Speaker 1: She'll be forever be known as this. Kirsten Nielsen is
Speaker 1: out as Homeland Security chief. Yeah, well, i'd hold that applause,
Speaker 1: I'd hold on not had taken even supposedly, it's going
Speaker 1: to be even tough for the stance at the border,
Speaker 1: families being separated and seeing Kinson cames is how much
Speaker 1: tougher than gonna be? As much as people don't like
Speaker 1: Kirsten Nielsen, and she'll always be remembered for the separation
Speaker 1: of families, it's not her fault that we're seeing these
Speaker 1: numbers come in. Well, but to just shoot her out
Speaker 1: and expect that someone like Stephen Miller, someone's gonna be tougher,
Speaker 1: is gonna se the problem. I don't know what they're
Speaker 1: going to do to these kids. What's fascinating to me
Speaker 1: is that I believe she sold her soul because she
Speaker 1: did become the face of separating babies from their parents.
Speaker 1: We now know that it's going to take about two
Speaker 1: years to even find out the true extent of this horror.
Speaker 1: You know, because thousands of children were separated from their families.
Speaker 1: And for the rest of her life, for the rest
Speaker 1: of her life, people will look at her and think, oh,
Speaker 1: that's the woman who put children in cages, that's the
Speaker 1: woman who broke up families across the border. And you
Speaker 1: know what, they'll be right because she implemented that policy.
Speaker 1: Jeff Sessions, the Attorney General, sort of created it, but
Speaker 1: she implemented it. And you know, she's going to get
Speaker 1: what she deserved. Remember when it comes to curity mails
Speaker 1: and service as Homeland Security Secretary, is that it mattered
Speaker 1: that the administration has dealt with with the zero tolerance policy.
Speaker 1: In the spring of twenty eighteen, it was Secretary Nielsen
Speaker 1: who said that was not an intention of the administration
Speaker 1: to separate children from their parents. She oversaw the family
Speaker 1: separation policy, which prompted protests across the country and heartbreaking
Speaker 1: images of children in cages. And yet at the end
Speaker 1: of the day, this administration felt like that policy was
Speaker 1: not extreme enough, that was not hard enough, and they're
Speaker 1: going to try to take it even further in the
Speaker 1: days and weeks ahead. You know, it's just ridiculous. I mean,
Speaker 1: it's it's so backwards with everybody on the left. All right,
Speaker 1: let's get to our busy phones here. Let's say hi
Speaker 1: to Daniels in Michigan. Daniel, Hi, how are you glad
Speaker 1: you called? Sir? Thank you? Sean. Okay, Sean, So, California
Speaker 1: declared itself a sanctuary state and then you had the
Speaker 1: sanctuary cities and they ignore the federal immigration laws and
Speaker 1: it's been that way for years, correct, Yes, okay, So Sean,
Speaker 1: here's the stuns me. I'm from Michigan. If Michigan declared
Speaker 1: itself a pro life state and said it's going to
Speaker 1: ignore federal abortion laws, and if Obama was president and
Speaker 1: Eric Holder or Loretta Lynch where the attorney general, Sean,
Speaker 1: I'll tell you. I'll tell you what'll happen. Within two weeks, Well,
Speaker 1: they sue Michigan. Within two weeks. The federal court would
Speaker 1: say Michigan has to enforce federal abortion laws. And if
Speaker 1: Michigan didn't follow the federal churches thing, within two weeks,
Speaker 1: Eric Holder or Loretta Lynch would bring criminal charges against
Speaker 1: the officials in Michigan. They would last two three weeks
Speaker 1: and they would be following federal abortion law. How in
Speaker 1: the world can cities and states ignore federal immigration laws
Speaker 1: and it goes on for months and years. Well, I
Speaker 1: gotta tell you something, at some point there's got to
Speaker 1: be the charge of aiding and abetting. Number One, they're
Speaker 1: ignoring federal laws. I think these states now we have
Speaker 1: to consider if they're not going to hand over you know,
Speaker 1: look at the case. You know we've had on those programs.
Speaker 1: How many times have we had Steve Ronobek talking about
Speaker 1: his son Grant is twenty two year old kid was killed.
Speaker 1: He was working overnight in a convenience store. Who did it? Oh?
Speaker 1: A guy that had held a woman captive, kidnapped her,
Speaker 1: raped and abused her, and assaulted her. Spent a lot
Speaker 1: of time in jail. What they didn't hand this person
Speaker 1: over the ice? Now he goes he wants to pack
Speaker 1: of cigarettes for free. The kid is handing over the cigarettes,
Speaker 1: he's still got killed. At what point do we not say, okay,
Speaker 1: sanctuary cities and states are aiding and abetting in the
Speaker 1: crime when they let these criminal when they protect these
Speaker 1: criminal illegal immigrants from being deported, and even now after
Speaker 1: we deport that. We had a situation last week in
Speaker 1: Long Island, New York a guy that had been guilty
Speaker 1: back I've got two thousand and five of manslaughter. Okay,
Speaker 1: he's back in the country's back in Long Island. MS
Speaker 1: thirteen member. That's because our borders are wide open and
Speaker 1: people now know how to get across. Why do you
Speaker 1: think this caravan is as big as it is because
Speaker 1: they know the walls going up. Democrats may not have
Speaker 1: figured it out, but they have. And there's a certain
Speaker 1: urgency now building among those people that they kind of
Speaker 1: that want to come here, maybe a lot of them
Speaker 1: good people, but that they don't want to come in legally.
Speaker 1: And we've got to respect our laws, our sovereignty, our borders,
Speaker 1: and we have the right to vet you to make
Speaker 1: sure that you're not going to bring harm to any
Speaker 1: American and certainly you have the means to take care
Speaker 1: of yourself anyway. You know what's got to happen. We
Speaker 1: should take away funding from those states those cities that
Speaker 1: do this, because they're helping, they are aiding in embedding
Speaker 1: future crimes. And it's fairly predictable. Recidivism rate or violent
Speaker 1: offenders is, you know, predictable. It's high. Some people performing
Speaker 1: in prison, many do not, All right, let's go to
Speaker 1: Dan and DC. What's up, Dan the Man? How are
Speaker 1: you glad you called? Sir? Thank you on our retired
Speaker 1: marine now working in DC as a contractor into your show.
Speaker 1: Thank you, sir, sim provide to you as well. Um,
Speaker 1: I had some thoughts on Adam Schiff that I just
Speaker 1: wanted to throw your way and get some feedback if
Speaker 1: you had some time. And that was that. Uh. You know,
Speaker 1: he continues to run with this, this preponderance of evidence
Speaker 1: that there was some form of collusion or some form
Speaker 1: of obstruction, and yet you know, we know he has nothing,
Speaker 1: and yet he continues to insist in front of every
Speaker 1: camera that he ever gets in front of. At what
Speaker 1: point does the Republican Party or even Devin Unus just
Speaker 1: pull his punk card and say, look, either produce whatever
Speaker 1: evidence you claim you have or be cited for obstruction yourself.
Speaker 1: I mean, is not withholding evidence. I would be just
Speaker 1: and I would throw that. I would throw that at
Speaker 1: Swallowell as well. You know, let's pull our punk cards.
Speaker 1: Let's hold them accountable for what they're saying to the
Speaker 1: American public. So look, if you are withholding evidence, because
Speaker 1: you've been doing it for two years now, oh, I
Speaker 1: have this, I have this, I've seen this. I've seen this,
Speaker 1: well show it or the only one that I know
Speaker 1: on tape colluding with Russians to gather dirt to influence
Speaker 1: elections is the cowardly Shift. Now. I think I've been
Speaker 1: pretty generous in offering him and Nadler, you know, all
Speaker 1: this time on my radio and TV shows, and whatever
Speaker 1: reason they don't call us back. I wonder why, maybe
Speaker 1: they'll call me into their committee and I'll bring the
Speaker 1: tapes with me there and I'll start playing them in
Speaker 1: their own words, because they're a bunch of liars. And
Speaker 1: let me tell you something, if they care, look at
Speaker 1: the Ukrainian story we broke earlier. You literally have a
Speaker 1: headline today Ukrainian too. US prosecutors, why don't you want
Speaker 1: our evidence on Democrats colluding to help Hillary win in
Speaker 1: twenty sixteen with actual real evidence, and then Joe Biden's
Speaker 1: own son up to his eyeballs and all of this.
Speaker 1: I know, every time I mentioned the Shift thing, everybody
Speaker 1: wants me to play because it's the funniest thing. I
Speaker 1: play a little bit. What is the nature of the
Speaker 1: compromising material and the naked and so bus met with Trump. Yeah,
Speaker 1: in New York at some point after the Trump Yes, Agin, absolutely,
Speaker 1: and she got compromising materials on Trump after their short
Speaker 1: relations okay. And what's the nature of the compromise, Well,
Speaker 1: there were pictures of naked Trump, okay, and so Putin
Speaker 1: was made aware of the availability of the compromising material Yes,
Speaker 1: of course, Buzza shared those materials with sub Schecking subshect
Speaker 1: shares those materials with Putin because she's a god daughter
Speaker 1: of Putin, and Puttin decided to press on Trump, well, materials,
Speaker 1: materials and Donald Trump compromising short after the short relationship.
Speaker 1: What is the nature of the compromise? Uh, pisures naked
Speaker 1: Tump naked Tump pictures. That's what we got, naked Tump
Speaker 1: Um did Vladimir knows? Vladimir is seen them? Yes, but
Speaker 1: of course so the Vladimir of course has seen the
Speaker 1: naked picts a Trump, He's seen it. Oh, we have
Speaker 1: the pictures, I mean, and he's leading the collusion thing.
Speaker 1: I mean, if it's not so fu is almost as
Speaker 1: funny as Alec Baldwin trying to be a radio talk
Speaker 1: show host. Now. Alec tweeted out today and I'm I
Speaker 1: tweeted I think earlier today. I hope it went on.
Speaker 1: I don't actually do my own tweeting anymore. I don't.
Speaker 1: I can't even get in my own accounts anymore. I've
Speaker 1: been blocked. My team says, no more tweeting. We'll do
Speaker 1: it for you. Um, but we put up that's interesting.
Speaker 1: This is a real trial for radio talk show. Um,
Speaker 1: when we come back, uh, we up some time. Okay,
Speaker 1: well we're gonna where can we take some calls? Ian?
Speaker 1: How about now? Whenever we want? We have calls that
Speaker 1: are on there now calls yet? No calls yet? What
Speaker 1: number do people call to get on the air, Ivan?
Speaker 1: Do we have that number? It's right there? You know?
Speaker 1: Do I have the call number in front of me. Oh,
Speaker 1: I'm so sorry. Sorry, it's interesting. Interesting at twelve ten
Speaker 1: at PHT of course, any other questions you have, any
Speaker 1: other comments you have, call us, um to the what else?
Speaker 1: Call us please at ten now. UM. If you don't call,
Speaker 1: we're gonna keep reading from the Scientology manual. You might
Speaker 1: not feel it. You might not feel the energy right now,
Speaker 1: you might not feel the swell of what's happening here.
Speaker 1: Everybody calls youet there Ivan, No calls let's more about scientology.
Speaker 1: Is Sean Hannity a scientologist? No Baldwin posing the big
Speaker 1: questions tonight here? Do we have any calls here yet? Ivan? None? Boy,
Speaker 1: it's just incredible, unbelievable. Well, you leave us no choice listeners.
Speaker 1: So all right, some of you are saying, that's this
Speaker 1: total be us. No, that was a real tryout on
Speaker 1: our affiliate WPHT in Philadelphia. Now, that was on the
Speaker 1: heels of a tryout at you know, my former station
Speaker 1: in New York, WABC. And that Ben Brian Whitman was
Speaker 1: a good guy. I mean, it's very liberal, but I
Speaker 1: like him a lot. I mean, we used to hand
Speaker 1: off to each other, you know, for a whole year,
Speaker 1: and I got to know him. He's a great guy,
Speaker 1: and um, we just don't agree politically. Brian was brought
Speaker 1: in to help him to just you know, help guide
Speaker 1: him through his tryout show. He was trying out to
Speaker 1: be a host, and then me and Levin called hit
Speaker 1: and he got so angry. Come back, Alec, come back.
Speaker 1: They're gone, Alec. Alec has walked out of the studio. Alec,
Speaker 1: please come, please come back. He is in the other room.
Speaker 1: Alec Baldwin has put on his jacket and he has left.
Speaker 1: I just went into the station lobby to the elevator
Speaker 1: bank to see if I can find Alec Baldwin and
Speaker 1: ask him to please return to the radio show, but
Speaker 1: he is gone. All right, that's gonna wrap things up
Speaker 1: for today. Let not we loaded up tonight new Gingrich,
Speaker 1: Laura Trump, Devin Newness, John Solomon, Devin and John are
Speaker 1: gonna be breaking news. Kevin McCarthy, Oh, this guy that
Speaker 1: worked for Obama on borders. Mark Morgan's phenomenal. Hope you'll
Speaker 1: join us. Thanks for being with us, See you tonight
Speaker 1: at nine. Back here tomorrow