WEBVTT - Dating in the Digital Age

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:07.440
<v Speaker 1>Brought to you by Toyota. Let's go places. Welcome to

0:00:07.600 --> 0:00:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Forward Thinking. Hey there everyone, and welcome to Forward Thinking,

0:00:15.720 --> 0:00:18.440
<v Speaker 1>the podcast that looks at the future and says, hey you,

0:00:18.720 --> 0:00:21.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't like your boyfriend. I'm Jonathan Strickland, I'm Lauren

0:00:21.600 --> 0:00:25.119
<v Speaker 1>voc Obama, I'm Joe McCormick. And today we're going to

0:00:25.200 --> 0:00:29.440
<v Speaker 1>talk about dating, dating in the digital age, uh something.

0:00:29.480 --> 0:00:32.479
<v Speaker 1>That's the thing. Joe and I we're experts at this

0:00:32.600 --> 0:00:38.080
<v Speaker 1>having having our our crazy lifestyles. Is settled down married men, No,

0:00:38.200 --> 0:00:40.480
<v Speaker 1>not at all. I'm speaking as a layman on this issue.

0:00:41.400 --> 0:00:46.199
<v Speaker 1>I am happily married and have never dated anyone online

0:00:46.200 --> 0:00:48.680
<v Speaker 1>in any way. Well, to be fair, I met my

0:00:48.760 --> 0:00:52.760
<v Speaker 1>wife through the internet. Oh my goodness. Yeah, so they

0:00:52.760 --> 0:00:55.360
<v Speaker 1>had the internet back then. Yeah, at that point it

0:00:55.440 --> 0:00:58.600
<v Speaker 1>was just tell net chat rooms, which is about are

0:00:58.600 --> 0:01:00.840
<v Speaker 1>you serious? I am being serious. I met my wife

0:01:00.960 --> 0:01:04.560
<v Speaker 1>and a telnet chat room. That is beautiful. That's a

0:01:04.640 --> 0:01:08.920
<v Speaker 1>heartwarming story for a for a tech stuff. Forward clicked,

0:01:09.400 --> 0:01:13.160
<v Speaker 1>we clicked, We met in person. She uh, she totally

0:01:13.200 --> 0:01:15.960
<v Speaker 1>swept me off my feet. Um. After a couple of

0:01:16.000 --> 0:01:19.680
<v Speaker 1>years we got married and we've been married for sixteen

0:01:19.760 --> 0:01:23.080
<v Speaker 1>years now. So Hey, there you go. The online dating

0:01:23.080 --> 0:01:26.640
<v Speaker 1>works based on our sample size size of one. Yeah.

0:01:26.800 --> 0:01:29.399
<v Speaker 1>In this case, again, it wasn't like, you know, we're

0:01:29.400 --> 0:01:32.840
<v Speaker 1>going to talk a little bit about specifically using the

0:01:32.880 --> 0:01:35.720
<v Speaker 1>Internet in an effort to find a date. In this case,

0:01:35.720 --> 0:01:37.280
<v Speaker 1>it was just one of those things where two people

0:01:37.640 --> 0:01:41.000
<v Speaker 1>who had an attraction towards each other just happened to meet.

0:01:41.319 --> 0:01:43.640
<v Speaker 1>It could have happened in any other kind of set

0:01:43.680 --> 0:01:46.200
<v Speaker 1>of circumstances, right, It's not like It's not like I

0:01:46.240 --> 0:01:48.240
<v Speaker 1>was going on this chat line hoping I could find

0:01:48.280 --> 0:01:51.680
<v Speaker 1>a girlfriend. Uh but you know, hey, I wasn't gonna

0:01:52.680 --> 0:01:55.960
<v Speaker 1>turn opportunity away. It only knocks the one time. So

0:01:56.320 --> 0:01:58.960
<v Speaker 1>I jumped on that ended up being great. So let's

0:01:59.000 --> 0:02:00.760
<v Speaker 1>talk a little bit about Let's talk a little bit

0:02:00.800 --> 0:02:06.080
<v Speaker 1>about using the great online age in a search for

0:02:06.120 --> 0:02:09.200
<v Speaker 1>someone to date. Yeah, I got a question, go ahead.

0:02:09.280 --> 0:02:12.200
<v Speaker 1>How does it work? All right? So how do you

0:02:12.639 --> 0:02:14.360
<v Speaker 1>how do you meet? So? Do you just type in

0:02:14.520 --> 0:02:18.640
<v Speaker 1>like date dot com or how do you? Well know it?

0:02:18.639 --> 0:02:20.880
<v Speaker 1>Pretty much it pretty much works in a very similar

0:02:20.919 --> 0:02:23.880
<v Speaker 1>way to how you would I would imagine go about

0:02:24.200 --> 0:02:27.919
<v Speaker 1>meeting people in other in other Hey, it's been sixteen years,

0:02:28.040 --> 0:02:31.080
<v Speaker 1>lare she's laughing at me right now, I'm like, look,

0:02:33.040 --> 0:02:36.160
<v Speaker 1>I've read my clay tablets I kept back in those days,

0:02:36.280 --> 0:02:39.720
<v Speaker 1>and I recall that it would involve very much similar

0:02:39.720 --> 0:02:41.640
<v Speaker 1>things as if you were meeting people in other in

0:02:41.680 --> 0:02:44.560
<v Speaker 1>other sets of circumstances. Right, you might have different social

0:02:44.639 --> 0:02:46.960
<v Speaker 1>cues that you're trying to read off of. But but

0:02:46.960 --> 0:02:49.520
<v Speaker 1>but but sure, you're you're you're gonna find someone who

0:02:50.120 --> 0:02:52.560
<v Speaker 1>you know based on their their pictures or their profile.

0:02:52.720 --> 0:02:54.760
<v Speaker 1>You know that the text that they've putten out there

0:02:55.240 --> 0:02:58.079
<v Speaker 1>about themselves. Hey, I might be attracted to this person,

0:02:58.200 --> 0:03:02.880
<v Speaker 1>and you know they might express reciprocating attraction. Yeah, okay,

0:03:02.919 --> 0:03:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Well let's enumerate here. What are the different ways people

0:03:06.080 --> 0:03:09.320
<v Speaker 1>meet each other online? Well, sure, there's there's social media

0:03:09.919 --> 0:03:13.160
<v Speaker 1>that we're going to talk about, you know, general like Facebook, Twitter, Tembler,

0:03:13.280 --> 0:03:15.560
<v Speaker 1>that kind of that kind of you know, sites not

0:03:15.880 --> 0:03:19.919
<v Speaker 1>intended specifically for dating arguably. Yeah, And then and then

0:03:19.960 --> 0:03:23.160
<v Speaker 1>there are sites that are specifically intended to make matches

0:03:23.400 --> 0:03:27.720
<v Speaker 1>online dating services things like match dot com or okay

0:03:27.760 --> 0:03:31.679
<v Speaker 1>Cupid or there dozens out there, and some of them

0:03:31.760 --> 0:03:36.000
<v Speaker 1>cater to very specific populations and some are more general

0:03:36.040 --> 0:03:39.400
<v Speaker 1>population and it all depends upon what you're looking for

0:03:39.520 --> 0:03:43.360
<v Speaker 1>and who you are looking for, you know, So that's

0:03:43.400 --> 0:03:45.960
<v Speaker 1>those are your basic approaches that we're going to cover

0:03:46.000 --> 0:03:48.119
<v Speaker 1>in this but we'll talk a little bit about how

0:03:48.160 --> 0:03:51.600
<v Speaker 1>that happens and and and what people how people tend

0:03:51.600 --> 0:03:56.240
<v Speaker 1>to behave on these sites when looking for a date. Okay, well,

0:03:56.600 --> 0:03:58.480
<v Speaker 1>maybe we should start with something that we all have

0:03:58.480 --> 0:04:01.640
<v Speaker 1>a little more experience with, which is just straight up

0:04:02.000 --> 0:04:07.600
<v Speaker 1>everyday social media. Okay, your Facebook, you're my Space, you're well.

0:04:07.760 --> 0:04:10.800
<v Speaker 1>One thing I would say is that one thing that

0:04:10.840 --> 0:04:13.240
<v Speaker 1>does not seem to change very much in in most

0:04:13.520 --> 0:04:16.960
<v Speaker 1>dating situations, whether you're talking online or offline, is that

0:04:17.000 --> 0:04:20.479
<v Speaker 1>you want to present to the other person your best self. Obviously,

0:04:20.680 --> 0:04:23.560
<v Speaker 1>right right right. A psychologist talk about, you know, you

0:04:23.640 --> 0:04:27.080
<v Speaker 1>having an actual and ideal and an ought self. Um,

0:04:27.440 --> 0:04:29.839
<v Speaker 1>the actual being what you are, the ideal being what

0:04:30.520 --> 0:04:34.719
<v Speaker 1>you feel like you you know, your your ideal that

0:04:34.960 --> 0:04:37.719
<v Speaker 1>basically sums it up, the best version that's possible of you,

0:04:37.839 --> 0:04:41.880
<v Speaker 1>and ought being based on societal expectations, what you think

0:04:41.880 --> 0:04:44.920
<v Speaker 1>you're expected to be. So in other words, it's like

0:04:44.960 --> 0:04:48.280
<v Speaker 1>there's the one that people actually see when you're out

0:04:48.400 --> 0:04:52.240
<v Speaker 1>producing behavior in public. There's the one that you try

0:04:52.279 --> 0:04:55.320
<v Speaker 1>to sort of cultivate when you're creating your social media

0:04:55.400 --> 0:04:57.800
<v Speaker 1>profile that you want people to think of you as,

0:04:57.960 --> 0:05:01.039
<v Speaker 1>or to to cultivate your presentation and to to other

0:05:01.080 --> 0:05:03.760
<v Speaker 1>people in general. This happens in three dimensions just as

0:05:03.800 --> 0:05:06.159
<v Speaker 1>often as it happens online. Yeah. Um. And then I

0:05:06.160 --> 0:05:08.560
<v Speaker 1>guess there's the aught, which is maybe what you do

0:05:08.600 --> 0:05:12.919
<v Speaker 1>when you're talking to a police officer. I don't what

0:05:13.080 --> 0:05:16.719
<v Speaker 1>you what you ought to do? Yeah, um, well, okay,

0:05:16.720 --> 0:05:18.919
<v Speaker 1>so I think there's something really interesting there. Now. You

0:05:19.000 --> 0:05:24.200
<v Speaker 1>mentioned that this cultivation of the presenting, the ideal personality

0:05:24.240 --> 0:05:26.960
<v Speaker 1>happens in person too, and it certainly does. They're like

0:05:27.040 --> 0:05:29.680
<v Speaker 1>different ways of behaving. There's how you behave at home

0:05:30.320 --> 0:05:32.720
<v Speaker 1>versus how you behave let's say, like on a first

0:05:32.800 --> 0:05:35.239
<v Speaker 1>day when you're really trying to get somebody to see

0:05:35.279 --> 0:05:38.000
<v Speaker 1>you how you want to be seen. But one thing

0:05:38.080 --> 0:05:40.920
<v Speaker 1>I think that social media does change is it gives

0:05:40.960 --> 0:05:45.640
<v Speaker 1>you even more power and control over exactly what you

0:05:45.800 --> 0:05:49.320
<v Speaker 1>look like. You have more time to plan what you're

0:05:49.320 --> 0:05:52.839
<v Speaker 1>gonna say, to sort of like create a list of

0:05:52.920 --> 0:05:56.200
<v Speaker 1>interests that you think makes you look good, to select

0:05:56.320 --> 0:05:59.120
<v Speaker 1>photos that are flattering to you only that you have

0:05:59.200 --> 0:06:02.680
<v Speaker 1>the time and the ability to look into what the person,

0:06:03.000 --> 0:06:05.200
<v Speaker 1>assuming that you can see their profile, you can see

0:06:05.200 --> 0:06:07.960
<v Speaker 1>how they behave and what they seem to like, and

0:06:08.000 --> 0:06:11.760
<v Speaker 1>then cultivate your approach so that you actually fit that

0:06:12.400 --> 0:06:15.400
<v Speaker 1>more than you would otherwise. So in other words, absolutely,

0:06:15.480 --> 0:06:17.839
<v Speaker 1>and well, I mean, I mean that that does happen. Still,

0:06:18.640 --> 0:06:21.640
<v Speaker 1>there was research done way back into a way back

0:06:21.680 --> 0:06:25.920
<v Speaker 1>into the eighties no one was alive then, um since

0:06:25.960 --> 0:06:29.400
<v Speaker 1>before the interwebs, about how if you're meeting someone for

0:06:29.440 --> 0:06:31.200
<v Speaker 1>the first time, if you expect them to be a

0:06:31.240 --> 0:06:35.039
<v Speaker 1>potential mate, that you're going to check up on them first,

0:06:35.080 --> 0:06:37.200
<v Speaker 1>You're going to do research, and you're going to tailor

0:06:37.720 --> 0:06:42.000
<v Speaker 1>yourself on that day to what you think they're expectations

0:06:42.040 --> 0:06:44.599
<v Speaker 1>will be. So there is and yes, you're right, Joe.

0:06:44.640 --> 0:06:47.240
<v Speaker 1>The research states that based on the fact that that

0:06:47.279 --> 0:06:49.040
<v Speaker 1>you can you know, it's we do have greater self

0:06:49.040 --> 0:06:52.679
<v Speaker 1>control over our presentation online than we do in other places,

0:06:53.200 --> 0:06:55.560
<v Speaker 1>based partially on the fact that a lot of the

0:06:55.640 --> 0:06:58.640
<v Speaker 1>cues that we pick up on in person are non

0:06:58.760 --> 0:07:02.560
<v Speaker 1>verbal ones and have a little bit less purposeful control

0:07:02.640 --> 0:07:04.960
<v Speaker 1>over that. You know, people will pick up on things

0:07:05.000 --> 0:07:08.200
<v Speaker 1>that we're that we're thinking or feeling by the way

0:07:08.200 --> 0:07:11.120
<v Speaker 1>that we're holding ourselves, by the words that we use

0:07:11.280 --> 0:07:15.160
<v Speaker 1>randomly when so, in other words, it's more than what

0:07:15.200 --> 0:07:17.920
<v Speaker 1>you're just saying. So, for example, if I were single

0:07:17.960 --> 0:07:20.720
<v Speaker 1>and I were trying to ask a girl out, and

0:07:20.760 --> 0:07:23.120
<v Speaker 1>I was I was expressing something and I was not

0:07:23.240 --> 0:07:26.760
<v Speaker 1>being sincere in that it might come across in my

0:07:26.880 --> 0:07:28.840
<v Speaker 1>body language in a way that if I were to

0:07:29.000 --> 0:07:31.600
<v Speaker 1>just type out a message, it might be more difficult

0:07:31.640 --> 0:07:34.680
<v Speaker 1>to detect whether or not I was being sincere. Sure. However,

0:07:34.720 --> 0:07:38.240
<v Speaker 1>there are two arguments kind of countering this, and one

0:07:38.320 --> 0:07:41.280
<v Speaker 1>is that, um, the the social cues that we pick

0:07:41.360 --> 0:07:45.920
<v Speaker 1>up on online are are very deep and and rich,

0:07:46.240 --> 0:07:48.800
<v Speaker 1>and that you know, I mean from from the way that,

0:07:49.080 --> 0:07:51.400
<v Speaker 1>for example, for body language, the way that someone holds

0:07:51.440 --> 0:07:53.600
<v Speaker 1>themselves in their photos, or what the photos are of,

0:07:53.720 --> 0:07:55.480
<v Speaker 1>or what else is going on in the background, you

0:07:55.480 --> 0:07:57.720
<v Speaker 1>can judge a lot about a person. Um even if

0:07:57.760 --> 0:08:00.920
<v Speaker 1>they're a very flattering photo that has been very carefully cropped.

0:08:00.960 --> 0:08:02.680
<v Speaker 1>There's still cues that you can pick up on if

0:08:02.680 --> 0:08:05.800
<v Speaker 1>you know enough about the culture of online dating to

0:08:05.840 --> 0:08:08.560
<v Speaker 1>do so, or if you are paying enough attention to

0:08:08.680 --> 0:08:11.800
<v Speaker 1>want to or um or specifics in the wording, or

0:08:11.840 --> 0:08:13.840
<v Speaker 1>what they link to or what they don't link to,

0:08:14.160 --> 0:08:17.320
<v Speaker 1>or you know, and just any number of things about

0:08:17.360 --> 0:08:21.000
<v Speaker 1>this person's profile that you can really nitpick. So intimacy

0:08:21.160 --> 0:08:24.680
<v Speaker 1>is is developed partially through a process of self disclosure.

0:08:25.080 --> 0:08:27.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, if if you want to get close to someone,

0:08:27.600 --> 0:08:30.200
<v Speaker 1>part of what you're going to do is reveal stuff

0:08:30.200 --> 0:08:33.000
<v Speaker 1>about yourself so that you feel like you're understood. Because

0:08:33.080 --> 0:08:36.400
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of the point um for a lot of

0:08:36.400 --> 0:08:39.599
<v Speaker 1>people in a lot of situations. Uh, So there's a

0:08:39.720 --> 0:08:43.920
<v Speaker 1>drive generally to to reconcile this this autonomy and an

0:08:43.960 --> 0:08:46.400
<v Speaker 1>impression management that we're working with all the time with

0:08:46.440 --> 0:08:50.480
<v Speaker 1>honesty and openness, right and and also, I mean when

0:08:50.520 --> 0:08:53.240
<v Speaker 1>you look at things like Facebook where you are allowed

0:08:53.280 --> 0:08:58.280
<v Speaker 1>to tweak how people see your profile, uh that can

0:08:58.480 --> 0:09:01.720
<v Speaker 1>end up being a way of even just knowing that

0:09:01.840 --> 0:09:04.439
<v Speaker 1>can mean that you end up getting a better idea

0:09:04.440 --> 0:09:06.000
<v Speaker 1>of what the person is looking for, what they're not

0:09:06.080 --> 0:09:08.760
<v Speaker 1>looking for. Yeah, I think there's there's an interesting thing

0:09:08.800 --> 0:09:11.319
<v Speaker 1>that comes out of the super talkument ways that social

0:09:11.320 --> 0:09:15.360
<v Speaker 1>media might be changing dating. Um, So, before you would

0:09:15.360 --> 0:09:19.160
<v Speaker 1>have to make judgments about the way a person carried

0:09:19.200 --> 0:09:22.440
<v Speaker 1>themselves of their body language and all that. Um. But

0:09:22.600 --> 0:09:25.559
<v Speaker 1>now I think maybe there's sort of these meta tells

0:09:26.160 --> 0:09:29.120
<v Speaker 1>um that are not so much about the content of

0:09:29.160 --> 0:09:32.720
<v Speaker 1>the profile, but analyzing the way the person put the

0:09:32.760 --> 0:09:36.920
<v Speaker 1>profile together. For example, you might totally be into the

0:09:37.000 --> 0:09:40.319
<v Speaker 1>idea of a guy who is fairly muscular, But if

0:09:40.360 --> 0:09:43.200
<v Speaker 1>a guy takes pictures of himself with his shirt off

0:09:43.240 --> 0:09:46.960
<v Speaker 1>showing his muscles on Facebook, that's sort of like meta

0:09:47.040 --> 0:09:50.960
<v Speaker 1>analysis of his process of creating the profile might give

0:09:50.960 --> 0:09:53.920
<v Speaker 1>you clues that you would then use to analyze well

0:09:54.080 --> 0:09:57.600
<v Speaker 1>maybe not right, right, absolutely, yeah, that's that's totally I mean, yeah,

0:09:57.640 --> 0:09:59.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, like like physically fit is clearly and e

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:04.240
<v Speaker 1>lutionary advantage. But I'd really appreciate if you wouldn't talk

0:10:04.240 --> 0:10:09.120
<v Speaker 1>about my Facebook profile on the podcast. It's a thing though,

0:10:09.200 --> 0:10:15.120
<v Speaker 1>right the Facebook. I lack the muscles to show, and

0:10:15.160 --> 0:10:16.800
<v Speaker 1>even if I had them, I would not be showing

0:10:16.800 --> 0:10:19.080
<v Speaker 1>them off. But but but but it does tell It

0:10:19.120 --> 0:10:20.760
<v Speaker 1>does tell you something about a person if they have

0:10:20.920 --> 0:10:24.320
<v Speaker 1>a great number of carefully posed selfies and you know,

0:10:24.679 --> 0:10:28.000
<v Speaker 1>and yeah, and it doesn't necessarily mean this is a

0:10:28.000 --> 0:10:30.160
<v Speaker 1>good or a bad thing. It may very well just

0:10:30.240 --> 0:10:32.160
<v Speaker 1>mean that this is something that tells you whether or

0:10:32.160 --> 0:10:35.600
<v Speaker 1>not a person would be compatible with who you are, right,

0:10:35.600 --> 0:10:37.560
<v Speaker 1>So we're not we're not trying to suggest that there

0:10:37.559 --> 0:10:41.120
<v Speaker 1>are specific profiles out there and bad. Yeah, it's more

0:10:41.200 --> 0:10:45.000
<v Speaker 1>like suitable or unsuitable based upon your own personal preferences.

0:10:45.400 --> 0:10:47.400
<v Speaker 1>And that's that's the key thing to remember here is

0:10:47.440 --> 0:10:50.560
<v Speaker 1>what what works for one person may totally not work

0:10:50.640 --> 0:10:54.480
<v Speaker 1>for someone else. That's I mean, that's romance, right, yeah, exactly,

0:10:54.520 --> 0:10:56.440
<v Speaker 1>And that's that's the case. That's the case whether you're

0:10:56.480 --> 0:10:58.760
<v Speaker 1>online or offline. We're just trying to say that, you know,

0:10:58.760 --> 0:11:01.480
<v Speaker 1>there's certain things that you start to learn to look for. Yeah,

0:11:01.559 --> 0:11:05.800
<v Speaker 1>and and and also um, you know, there's some some

0:11:05.880 --> 0:11:09.880
<v Speaker 1>research indicates that the the that anonymity of the internet,

0:11:10.000 --> 0:11:13.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, frequently these days, the false anonymity because if

0:11:13.840 --> 0:11:16.040
<v Speaker 1>your full name is on Facebook, then I mean, and

0:11:16.080 --> 0:11:17.839
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to sign up using your real name,

0:11:17.880 --> 0:11:20.800
<v Speaker 1>we all know. But but you know, people can find

0:11:20.840 --> 0:11:23.440
<v Speaker 1>you through that. And so being online and having a

0:11:23.440 --> 0:11:26.640
<v Speaker 1>little bit of that disconnect from real life might actually

0:11:26.760 --> 0:11:29.600
<v Speaker 1>enable you to be more open and honest than you

0:11:29.679 --> 0:11:32.120
<v Speaker 1>might be in person. You know, if someone is sitting

0:11:32.120 --> 0:11:34.600
<v Speaker 1>there across from you and goes like do you like football?

0:11:35.280 --> 0:11:37.680
<v Speaker 1>You might go, what what do they expect me to say?

0:11:37.760 --> 0:11:39.679
<v Speaker 1>Should I say yes? Should I say no? Like, based

0:11:39.679 --> 0:11:41.800
<v Speaker 1>on their facial cues, I am going to form a

0:11:41.840 --> 0:11:44.040
<v Speaker 1>response in order to not hurt their feelings. But if

0:11:44.080 --> 0:11:49.240
<v Speaker 1>you're doing it into an online profile, then yeah, yeah, well,

0:11:49.280 --> 0:11:52.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean to me, the interesting thing about the social

0:11:52.960 --> 0:11:57.640
<v Speaker 1>media approach is that, you know, normally I think of

0:11:57.679 --> 0:12:01.319
<v Speaker 1>social media interactions, they tend to have been after someone's

0:12:01.360 --> 0:12:04.360
<v Speaker 1>met someone in real life already. I mean, occasionally they

0:12:04.360 --> 0:12:08.000
<v Speaker 1>can happen where you're you realize someone else, you know,

0:12:08.120 --> 0:12:11.680
<v Speaker 1>you know someone, and someone else knows that someone, and

0:12:11.679 --> 0:12:14.160
<v Speaker 1>then the two of you connect, right, So in other words,

0:12:14.200 --> 0:12:16.880
<v Speaker 1>you have a common friend, like show might be a

0:12:16.920 --> 0:12:20.640
<v Speaker 1>common friend between uh, a guy and a girl who

0:12:20.679 --> 0:12:23.880
<v Speaker 1>both discover one another because of their connection through Joe,

0:12:24.000 --> 0:12:26.840
<v Speaker 1>because they both post on his in depth Star Wars

0:12:27.000 --> 0:12:29.400
<v Speaker 1>argument threat on the Return of the Jedi, which that

0:12:29.600 --> 0:12:32.240
<v Speaker 1>we're not done with that discussion by the way, Joe,

0:12:32.559 --> 0:12:36.960
<v Speaker 1>all right, So that's one way. I don't know. Again,

0:12:37.040 --> 0:12:39.199
<v Speaker 1>since I've been out of the dating thing for so

0:12:39.280 --> 0:12:42.800
<v Speaker 1>long and Facebook didn't exist when I was dating, I

0:12:42.880 --> 0:12:46.679
<v Speaker 1>don't know how frequently people have that first interaction through

0:12:46.760 --> 0:12:51.080
<v Speaker 1>social media, as opposed to a like someone meeting someone

0:12:51.120 --> 0:12:53.760
<v Speaker 1>else in a different setting and then saying, um, you know,

0:12:53.840 --> 0:12:57.040
<v Speaker 1>finding them on Facebook that way. That's a good question.

0:12:57.520 --> 0:13:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Do we have any sort of sense generally how often

0:13:01.000 --> 0:13:04.400
<v Speaker 1>people just straight up meet through Facebook? It's a good question.

0:13:04.440 --> 0:13:06.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that there's any specific study that I

0:13:06.960 --> 0:13:09.520
<v Speaker 1>have not seen research on that, but that does not

0:13:09.679 --> 0:13:13.440
<v Speaker 1>mean that it doesn't exist. Yeah. Yeah, I mean we'll

0:13:13.480 --> 0:13:16.160
<v Speaker 1>also be talking a lot about stuff where the research

0:13:16.240 --> 0:13:20.240
<v Speaker 1>has been performed, has been through different has often been

0:13:20.280 --> 0:13:24.840
<v Speaker 1>funded by specific parties that are interested in the outcome

0:13:24.920 --> 0:13:28.120
<v Speaker 1>of those results. There are a lot of social media

0:13:28.240 --> 0:13:31.760
<v Speaker 1>quote stats on the Internet that are unsourced and I

0:13:31.760 --> 0:13:38.760
<v Speaker 1>don't know where they come from. Statistics are made up. Yeah, well,

0:13:38.800 --> 0:13:42.880
<v Speaker 1>maybe we should move away from social media and into

0:13:43.000 --> 0:13:46.440
<v Speaker 1>something that's a little more advanced. Like okay, so on

0:13:46.520 --> 0:13:50.240
<v Speaker 1>social media you could be forging romantic relationships that way,

0:13:50.400 --> 0:13:53.880
<v Speaker 1>just trying to sort of self select look at people's profiles, like,

0:13:53.920 --> 0:13:55.719
<v Speaker 1>oh I might be interested in that person. You might

0:13:55.800 --> 0:13:59.120
<v Speaker 1>just fall into it. Yeah, what about a service that

0:13:59.280 --> 0:14:03.840
<v Speaker 1>specific lead designed to foster romantic relationships? Joe, have you

0:14:03.880 --> 0:14:07.760
<v Speaker 1>heard about tact tact tact T a C T. And

0:14:07.800 --> 0:14:10.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm not talking about knowing what to say and when

0:14:10.960 --> 0:14:13.480
<v Speaker 1>not to say something. Yeah, let me get out my

0:14:13.520 --> 0:14:18.920
<v Speaker 1>tactle box. It's it stands for Technical Automated Compatibility Testing.

0:14:19.120 --> 0:14:23.040
<v Speaker 1>That sounds like online dating sort of. It actually precedes

0:14:23.080 --> 0:14:27.480
<v Speaker 1>online dating. Okay, turned back the clock to nineteen sixty four.

0:14:28.320 --> 0:14:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, Holy just know this story is gonna involve

0:14:34.600 --> 0:14:38.640
<v Speaker 1>like vicarious embarrassment. No no, no, no no no. Lewis

0:14:38.680 --> 0:14:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Altfest alright, he had gone to this event where he

0:14:44.040 --> 0:14:48.040
<v Speaker 1>saw a computer that would match things together, and then

0:14:48.040 --> 0:14:50.000
<v Speaker 1>he thought, huh, I bet we could make a computer

0:14:50.160 --> 0:14:53.400
<v Speaker 1>program that could match people together. And he got with

0:14:53.600 --> 0:14:57.040
<v Speaker 1>a computer programmer named Robert Ross, and together Ross and

0:14:57.120 --> 0:15:01.480
<v Speaker 1>Altfest collaborated to create Project ACT. Like I said, Technical

0:15:01.520 --> 0:15:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Automated Compatibility Testing. It became New York City's first computer

0:15:06.360 --> 0:15:09.600
<v Speaker 1>dating service. And so the way it would work is

0:15:09.640 --> 0:15:12.920
<v Speaker 1>that clients would come in and answer multiple choice questions,

0:15:13.440 --> 0:15:16.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of them, like more than a hundred of them.

0:15:16.400 --> 0:15:18.680
<v Speaker 1>And you would answer all these different multiple choice questions.

0:15:18.680 --> 0:15:22.360
<v Speaker 1>You would also be uh asked to choose dislike for

0:15:22.440 --> 0:15:24.280
<v Speaker 1>things that you did not like to be like a

0:15:24.440 --> 0:15:26.560
<v Speaker 1>twenty or something items on the list, and you would

0:15:26.600 --> 0:15:28.840
<v Speaker 1>pick all the things on that list that you specifically

0:15:28.880 --> 0:15:31.640
<v Speaker 1>did not like. Uh. And on top of that, you

0:15:31.720 --> 0:15:34.080
<v Speaker 1>had a couple of other kind of general questions, like

0:15:34.600 --> 0:15:39.240
<v Speaker 1>the men were asked to evaluate various ladies hairstyles. The

0:15:39.280 --> 0:15:42.360
<v Speaker 1>hairstyles were drawn and the men had to just decide

0:15:42.360 --> 0:15:44.760
<v Speaker 1>which ones they liked him which ones they didn't. Ladies

0:15:44.800 --> 0:15:49.400
<v Speaker 1>would be asked to what kind of mental uh image

0:15:49.400 --> 0:15:51.640
<v Speaker 1>do they have of their ideal man? Is it a

0:15:51.720 --> 0:15:56.640
<v Speaker 1>guy chopping wood or is it I'm totally not joking.

0:15:56.960 --> 0:16:00.600
<v Speaker 1>So you'd fill you'd fill out, you fill out this

0:16:00.640 --> 0:16:04.360
<v Speaker 1>whole whole sheet, and then you would have it fed

0:16:04.440 --> 0:16:06.760
<v Speaker 1>in and it was essentially become like a punch card.

0:16:07.400 --> 0:16:10.320
<v Speaker 1>It would fill. You turn that over to the computer.

0:16:10.360 --> 0:16:15.120
<v Speaker 1>It was a IBM Foudred series computer and you would

0:16:15.120 --> 0:16:18.000
<v Speaker 1>get a you would get up to five matches. Um,

0:16:18.480 --> 0:16:20.920
<v Speaker 1>it's not like you needed a bar in trade cards,

0:16:21.080 --> 0:16:23.120
<v Speaker 1>and then you each have to take them to the

0:16:23.120 --> 0:16:25.880
<v Speaker 1>computer dating And so you fill out the form and

0:16:25.920 --> 0:16:28.160
<v Speaker 1>you turn it in, They put it through the computer

0:16:28.280 --> 0:16:30.520
<v Speaker 1>and then based upon the other people who have also

0:16:30.680 --> 0:16:33.040
<v Speaker 1>in the database, it would Yeah, so you would get

0:16:33.320 --> 0:16:37.000
<v Speaker 1>five matches. Men would get five pink cards because pink

0:16:37.080 --> 0:16:41.640
<v Speaker 1>is for ladies, and ladies would get five blue cards.

0:16:41.840 --> 0:16:44.960
<v Speaker 1>So um, yeah, so you would get you would get

0:16:45.000 --> 0:16:47.440
<v Speaker 1>five matches, and then you could, Uh. The way it

0:16:47.440 --> 0:16:50.040
<v Speaker 1>would work is that it would the computer program would

0:16:50.080 --> 0:16:52.560
<v Speaker 1>match you up based upon other people's answers to those

0:16:52.600 --> 0:16:55.480
<v Speaker 1>same questions. So there'd be a certain threshold there, right,

0:16:55.720 --> 0:16:59.040
<v Speaker 1>and if you had someone above that threshold, they were

0:16:59.040 --> 0:17:01.720
<v Speaker 1>considered a match. Below that threshold, it was considered to

0:17:01.760 --> 0:17:04.520
<v Speaker 1>be incompatible and they would not be matched up. And

0:17:04.760 --> 0:17:07.159
<v Speaker 1>this was in the uh, the East Side over in

0:17:07.160 --> 0:17:09.120
<v Speaker 1>New York, where things were a little more kind of

0:17:09.160 --> 0:17:11.199
<v Speaker 1>fast and loose and crazy at the time. Things are

0:17:11.200 --> 0:17:15.240
<v Speaker 1>pretty GROOVYIXI. Yeah, so yeah, it was, you know, originally

0:17:15.280 --> 0:17:16.600
<v Speaker 1>it was one of those things that was kind of

0:17:16.600 --> 0:17:20.040
<v Speaker 1>a niche market, but it quickly became very popular in

0:17:20.080 --> 0:17:23.199
<v Speaker 1>all of New York. And that approach of taking the

0:17:23.240 --> 0:17:26.719
<v Speaker 1>profile of questions and using that to match up against

0:17:26.720 --> 0:17:31.600
<v Speaker 1>other potential dates, that is the basis of computer dating today,

0:17:31.640 --> 0:17:35.200
<v Speaker 1>although now some sites go a couple of steps further

0:17:35.280 --> 0:17:37.679
<v Speaker 1>to make it a little more complex, but that's the

0:17:37.680 --> 0:17:40.200
<v Speaker 1>basic idea, right right. I was listening to that, thinking

0:17:40.240 --> 0:17:43.199
<v Speaker 1>like I did that on Okay Cupid, except instead of

0:17:43.200 --> 0:17:46.359
<v Speaker 1>answering like a hundred questions, I probably spent like a

0:17:46.440 --> 0:17:49.320
<v Speaker 1>thousand questions worth back when I was in college and

0:17:49.320 --> 0:17:54.240
<v Speaker 1>really bored. Yeah, was it like Netflix, Like you could

0:17:54.240 --> 0:17:57.480
<v Speaker 1>just keep on going and going basically forever. Yeah. And

0:17:57.560 --> 0:17:59.800
<v Speaker 1>the idea being that the more, the more, the more

0:17:59.840 --> 0:18:03.120
<v Speaker 1>of amation you give, the more robust the profile will be. Now,

0:18:03.160 --> 0:18:05.840
<v Speaker 1>this is not this is not meant for necessarily for

0:18:05.960 --> 0:18:09.320
<v Speaker 1>the person who you're matched up to to see like, oh,

0:18:09.440 --> 0:18:12.320
<v Speaker 1>this is how she answered all of her questions. Here's

0:18:12.320 --> 0:18:15.440
<v Speaker 1>how I answered all my questions. And here's a compatibility, right,

0:18:15.600 --> 0:18:18.280
<v Speaker 1>it's a you know, based on what you're looking for,

0:18:18.359 --> 0:18:19.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, you know the same the same thing that

0:18:19.920 --> 0:18:22.120
<v Speaker 1>might happen with a with a roommate matchup in college

0:18:22.200 --> 0:18:24.080
<v Speaker 1>or something like that, like like like how clean or

0:18:24.119 --> 0:18:27.280
<v Speaker 1>messy are you? How like like how noisy are you? Versus?

0:18:27.359 --> 0:18:30.320
<v Speaker 1>What's your expectation? Are you a smoker? Are you? Do

0:18:30.359 --> 0:18:33.240
<v Speaker 1>you mind people who smoke? If you aren't a smoker,

0:18:33.440 --> 0:18:37.320
<v Speaker 1>you know? Are you a drinker? Is your ideal Friday

0:18:37.400 --> 0:18:39.800
<v Speaker 1>night going out to a bar? Is it staying home

0:18:39.800 --> 0:18:42.359
<v Speaker 1>and reading? Is it going to have a game somewhere.

0:18:42.400 --> 0:18:44.399
<v Speaker 1>How flexible are you about that kind of thing? Do

0:18:44.440 --> 0:18:47.720
<v Speaker 1>you enjoy making decisions or having decisions made for you?

0:18:47.720 --> 0:18:49.800
<v Speaker 1>You know that kind of that kind of balance, right,

0:18:49.840 --> 0:18:52.120
<v Speaker 1>And so of course the more questions you you answer,

0:18:52.400 --> 0:18:57.840
<v Speaker 1>the more reliable your profile is, assuming and huge quoting marks,

0:18:58.119 --> 0:19:00.919
<v Speaker 1>assuming that one you're being genuine and to that the

0:19:00.920 --> 0:19:03.439
<v Speaker 1>algorithm is a decent algorithm. Oh, that's got to be

0:19:03.480 --> 0:19:06.840
<v Speaker 1>something very interesting in designing these tests, because I bet

0:19:07.200 --> 0:19:11.720
<v Speaker 1>people don't always say exactly what's true about themselves. I

0:19:11.760 --> 0:19:14.640
<v Speaker 1>bet in a lot of cases because they don't actually know. Well,

0:19:14.680 --> 0:19:17.280
<v Speaker 1>sure you know that that and that idea of well,

0:19:17.320 --> 0:19:18.919
<v Speaker 1>I mean if you know the same way that the

0:19:19.840 --> 0:19:23.280
<v Speaker 1>what are the Myers Briggs tests will will repeat questions

0:19:23.280 --> 0:19:25.680
<v Speaker 1>in slightly different ways. That's I know that with stuff

0:19:25.720 --> 0:19:28.680
<v Speaker 1>like Okay Cupid, they'll do that pretty often to get

0:19:29.119 --> 0:19:32.280
<v Speaker 1>a more full concept of what you really meant by

0:19:32.359 --> 0:19:34.840
<v Speaker 1>the yes or no or a bright Because every now

0:19:34.840 --> 0:19:36.760
<v Speaker 1>and then, of course, you know, you get a question

0:19:36.840 --> 0:19:39.040
<v Speaker 1>where you read the question, you look at the answers

0:19:39.080 --> 0:19:42.600
<v Speaker 1>and you think, none of these answers really are representative

0:19:42.600 --> 0:19:44.720
<v Speaker 1>of how I feel about this. But I'll choose this

0:19:44.760 --> 0:19:47.520
<v Speaker 1>one because it's close, or you do. I'll choose this

0:19:47.560 --> 0:19:50.840
<v Speaker 1>one because I perceive that as being a better answer,

0:19:50.880 --> 0:19:53.080
<v Speaker 1>even if I don't actually feel that way. So again,

0:19:53.119 --> 0:19:56.320
<v Speaker 1>it becomes that thing about presenting your best self to

0:19:56.480 --> 0:19:59.080
<v Speaker 1>the other person. But there are some sites that figured

0:19:59.119 --> 0:20:02.120
<v Speaker 1>out how to get around that. Really. Yeah, yeah, they

0:20:02.160 --> 0:20:07.000
<v Speaker 1>call it revealed preference. So that's brilliant. No, that's what

0:20:07.040 --> 0:20:09.600
<v Speaker 1>I was asking. Yeah, yeah, so this this the term

0:20:09.800 --> 0:20:14.159
<v Speaker 1>I saw it, uh, revealed by a guy named Greg Blatt,

0:20:14.200 --> 0:20:16.120
<v Speaker 1>who is the CEO of the parent company that owns

0:20:16.160 --> 0:20:19.520
<v Speaker 1>match dot com. And um, he said, uh, what you

0:20:19.600 --> 0:20:22.960
<v Speaker 1>do is more important than what you say, and that

0:20:23.160 --> 0:20:27.120
<v Speaker 1>is where you get this revealed preference. The idea is that, uh,

0:20:27.240 --> 0:20:31.159
<v Speaker 1>the algorithm takes into account not just the things you

0:20:31.200 --> 0:20:33.760
<v Speaker 1>say you're looking for or the things you say are

0:20:33.840 --> 0:20:37.240
<v Speaker 1>important to you, but also your actual behavior when you're

0:20:37.359 --> 0:20:40.320
<v Speaker 1>using the site. So let's say that Let's say I'm

0:20:40.359 --> 0:20:43.199
<v Speaker 1>a single guy and I'm looking for a date, and

0:20:43.280 --> 0:20:46.960
<v Speaker 1>I've said that I really like tall blonds, but I

0:20:47.080 --> 0:20:50.320
<v Speaker 1>keep looking at tiny little redheads on there, and and

0:20:50.320 --> 0:20:52.919
<v Speaker 1>even though I've said i want tall blonds for some reason,

0:20:53.000 --> 0:20:56.760
<v Speaker 1>on my profile. I'm constantly clicking on all the pictures

0:20:56.840 --> 0:21:00.560
<v Speaker 1>of these these redheads were like five ft one or something,

0:21:00.880 --> 0:21:03.320
<v Speaker 1>or or if you say, you know, appearance doesn't matter,

0:21:03.840 --> 0:21:06.600
<v Speaker 1>but all of the profiles that you click on our

0:21:06.640 --> 0:21:09.800
<v Speaker 1>people with a high level of symmetry in their faces, right,

0:21:10.000 --> 0:21:13.119
<v Speaker 1>Or I say that that I think I want someone

0:21:13.119 --> 0:21:16.720
<v Speaker 1>who has very similar political views as myself, but then

0:21:17.080 --> 0:21:19.119
<v Speaker 1>I'm spending a lot of time looking at people who

0:21:19.240 --> 0:21:22.080
<v Speaker 1>don't necessarily fit that maybe, or talking to like maybe

0:21:22.080 --> 0:21:24.560
<v Speaker 1>the only people that you continually chat with are ones

0:21:24.560 --> 0:21:26.960
<v Speaker 1>who you can have a really good argument. Yeah, So

0:21:27.000 --> 0:21:29.479
<v Speaker 1>these all of these kind of activities getting factored in,

0:21:29.520 --> 0:21:31.800
<v Speaker 1>and so what they call it is they call it dissonance.

0:21:32.240 --> 0:21:35.639
<v Speaker 1>It's the dissonance between what you have said you wanted

0:21:35.760 --> 0:21:38.719
<v Speaker 1>and what your actual behavior is telling the computer. So

0:21:38.800 --> 0:21:41.679
<v Speaker 1>here's how they take that into account. They take the

0:21:41.720 --> 0:21:45.320
<v Speaker 1>dissonance between your actual answers and your behavior, and they

0:21:45.359 --> 0:21:48.240
<v Speaker 1>look for other people who have similar dissonance between their

0:21:48.280 --> 0:21:51.200
<v Speaker 1>actions and their behavior, because I figure, if you're both

0:21:51.240 --> 0:21:55.080
<v Speaker 1>being deceptive, whether it's the way exactly if you're if

0:21:55.080 --> 0:21:58.080
<v Speaker 1>you're being deceptive, whether it's self deceptive or otherwise, you're

0:21:58.080 --> 0:22:01.160
<v Speaker 1>probably a pretty good match that foster is a wonderful

0:22:01.240 --> 0:22:05.959
<v Speaker 1>kind of enabling relationship. Look, we're talking about forming relationships, right,

0:22:06.000 --> 0:22:09.760
<v Speaker 1>We're not necessarily talking about finding someone to fix someone else.

0:22:10.320 --> 0:22:12.840
<v Speaker 1>I think we've all sort of been at least we're

0:22:12.880 --> 0:22:15.760
<v Speaker 1>aware of situations where people have tried to quote unquote

0:22:15.800 --> 0:22:19.600
<v Speaker 1>fix other people and that rarely turns out well. Oh share. Also, also,

0:22:19.640 --> 0:22:22.040
<v Speaker 1>the level of honesty and openness that you have with

0:22:22.160 --> 0:22:25.119
<v Speaker 1>someone is going to depend on the involvement and intimacy

0:22:25.160 --> 0:22:27.760
<v Speaker 1>of your relationship. And that's whether it's online or offline.

0:22:27.800 --> 0:22:30.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's it's you can't say that people lie

0:22:30.200 --> 0:22:32.760
<v Speaker 1>on the internet as opposed to in real life, because

0:22:33.000 --> 0:22:36.240
<v Speaker 1>I've people lie in real life all the time. Yeah, yeah,

0:22:36.280 --> 0:22:38.479
<v Speaker 1>I usually do at least three times a podcast, But

0:22:38.560 --> 0:22:40.120
<v Speaker 1>it's up to the listener to figure out what those

0:22:40.119 --> 0:22:44.240
<v Speaker 1>three times are. So here's another interesting thing about these algorithms, Joe.

0:22:44.280 --> 0:22:46.400
<v Speaker 1>So we've already talked about the fact that it's it's

0:22:46.400 --> 0:22:49.000
<v Speaker 1>looking at your behavior and figuring out what you really

0:22:49.040 --> 0:22:51.160
<v Speaker 1>want versus what you say you want, and then looking

0:22:51.160 --> 0:22:54.040
<v Speaker 1>for other people where you are what they really want

0:22:54.119 --> 0:22:57.479
<v Speaker 1>versus what they say they want. It also starts to

0:22:57.560 --> 0:23:01.960
<v Speaker 1>predict and extrapolate based upon what limited interaction you've had.

0:23:01.960 --> 0:23:04.520
<v Speaker 1>So let's say that you do not go on the

0:23:04.560 --> 0:23:07.640
<v Speaker 1>site regularly, but you use the site. You just you're

0:23:07.680 --> 0:23:10.080
<v Speaker 1>just not on there. You're not contacting lots of people

0:23:10.160 --> 0:23:13.040
<v Speaker 1>sending messages. You've done it a couple of times, maybe,

0:23:13.040 --> 0:23:17.439
<v Speaker 1>but you're not like blanketing the the entire website with

0:23:17.520 --> 0:23:21.480
<v Speaker 1>your your comments or or or requests or anything along

0:23:21.560 --> 0:23:26.120
<v Speaker 1>those lines. What these algorithms will do as they will

0:23:26.160 --> 0:23:30.680
<v Speaker 1>match you you up based upon your behaviors to all

0:23:31.000 --> 0:23:34.320
<v Speaker 1>the past history of everybody else who has ever used

0:23:34.359 --> 0:23:37.239
<v Speaker 1>the site, and then look for matches between you and

0:23:37.280 --> 0:23:39.440
<v Speaker 1>the way other people have behaved in the past, and

0:23:39.480 --> 0:23:41.639
<v Speaker 1>if it finds a match, it then predicts that you're

0:23:41.680 --> 0:23:44.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna behave in pretty much the same way those people

0:23:44.080 --> 0:23:48.280
<v Speaker 1>back then behaved. And therefore we'll start not unique. Well

0:23:49.160 --> 0:23:53.439
<v Speaker 1>when you start, when you start looking at those big numbers,

0:23:53.440 --> 0:23:55.760
<v Speaker 1>that does seem to happen. Yeah, So so that's the

0:23:55.760 --> 0:23:58.040
<v Speaker 1>thing is that it's actually saying that. All right, So

0:23:58.160 --> 0:24:01.919
<v Speaker 1>Joe sent two messages over the past month, but based

0:24:02.000 --> 0:24:05.480
<v Speaker 1>upon who he contacted and his behavior, these are the

0:24:05.520 --> 0:24:08.600
<v Speaker 1>people we think he would be best suited to to

0:24:08.680 --> 0:24:11.840
<v Speaker 1>be matched with because we've decided that Joe is just

0:24:12.000 --> 0:24:14.880
<v Speaker 1>like this guy named Richard who used the site six

0:24:15.000 --> 0:24:17.359
<v Speaker 1>years ago and behaved in the same way and was

0:24:17.400 --> 0:24:19.760
<v Speaker 1>way more active for a longer period. So we're just

0:24:19.800 --> 0:24:22.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna extrapolate Joe's behavior to say he would follow in

0:24:22.359 --> 0:24:25.160
<v Speaker 1>the same footsteps as Richard from six years ago. Unfortunately,

0:24:25.280 --> 0:24:28.600
<v Speaker 1>Richard is dead now because on the site, all right,

0:24:28.640 --> 0:24:32.120
<v Speaker 1>well you know there's Joe. Just watch your back, man.

0:24:32.560 --> 0:24:35.479
<v Speaker 1>So uh, At any rate, Yeah, it's kind of interesting

0:24:35.520 --> 0:24:38.160
<v Speaker 1>that the algorithms not don't just look at at what

0:24:38.240 --> 0:24:40.640
<v Speaker 1>you say you want versus what you apparently want based

0:24:40.640 --> 0:24:43.520
<v Speaker 1>on your behavior, but it extrapolates future behavior based upon

0:24:44.280 --> 0:24:47.000
<v Speaker 1>the huge sample size of data that some of these

0:24:47.040 --> 0:24:50.359
<v Speaker 1>sites have. That's really interesting. So when I thought about

0:24:50.960 --> 0:24:54.040
<v Speaker 1>how these algorithms work before, I typically thought of them

0:24:54.080 --> 0:24:57.800
<v Speaker 1>as um, I don't know, sort of creating some data

0:24:57.880 --> 0:25:02.200
<v Speaker 1>that would quickly help other people know what they needed

0:25:02.240 --> 0:25:05.400
<v Speaker 1>to know about you. But it seems like it can

0:25:05.440 --> 0:25:09.399
<v Speaker 1>also help you figure out what you yourself want but

0:25:09.560 --> 0:25:12.879
<v Speaker 1>don't know that you want. Absolutely I would in the

0:25:12.880 --> 0:25:16.320
<v Speaker 1>case of Okay Cupid and my early college experience with it,

0:25:16.400 --> 0:25:18.680
<v Speaker 1>When I first joined the site, it was because they

0:25:18.680 --> 0:25:21.160
<v Speaker 1>had a lot of quizzes up and I was in

0:25:21.200 --> 0:25:24.000
<v Speaker 1>that I'm bored on the internet in college phase where

0:25:24.040 --> 0:25:27.120
<v Speaker 1>I liked taking a whole lot of quizzes, and they

0:25:27.160 --> 0:25:29.119
<v Speaker 1>made me sign up for They made me sign up

0:25:29.119 --> 0:25:30.680
<v Speaker 1>for an account and I was like, well fine, and

0:25:30.720 --> 0:25:32.560
<v Speaker 1>then they kind of sent me a personality profile and

0:25:32.560 --> 0:25:35.240
<v Speaker 1>I was like, well, okay, fine, and then they were like, hey,

0:25:35.280 --> 0:25:36.760
<v Speaker 1>here's some people you might want to date. And I

0:25:36.800 --> 0:25:39.280
<v Speaker 1>was like, whoa. That wasn't why I signed up for

0:25:39.320 --> 0:25:42.440
<v Speaker 1>this thing, but I guess you're doing that now, and yeah,

0:25:42.480 --> 0:25:46.040
<v Speaker 1>actually that was okay. Cupid took a very interesting approach

0:25:46.080 --> 0:25:47.840
<v Speaker 1>that way. Like you said, they had all these different

0:25:47.840 --> 0:25:50.880
<v Speaker 1>sort of meme surveys where, you know, to the point

0:25:50.960 --> 0:25:53.080
<v Speaker 1>now where there are thousands of them, right, but all

0:25:53.119 --> 0:25:55.960
<v Speaker 1>personality profile stuff right Essentially, you know, it's it's stuff

0:25:56.000 --> 0:25:58.680
<v Speaker 1>that you're meant to take for fun, but at the

0:25:58.720 --> 0:26:01.560
<v Speaker 1>same time they're gathering in formation that are that could

0:26:01.560 --> 0:26:04.360
<v Speaker 1>potentially set you up on quote unquote the perfect date.

0:26:04.720 --> 0:26:07.920
<v Speaker 1>That's a pretty smart marketing model, because I mean, who

0:26:07.960 --> 0:26:10.480
<v Speaker 1>doesn't get a little bit curious about like, well, what

0:26:10.520 --> 0:26:13.320
<v Speaker 1>don't I know about myself. Well, I got another. I

0:26:13.400 --> 0:26:17.200
<v Speaker 1>got another. So let's let's go beyond algorithms. Have something

0:26:17.200 --> 0:26:20.000
<v Speaker 1>else to tell you? Yeah, have you ever thought about well,

0:26:20.040 --> 0:26:22.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, obviously we're out of this one, Joe, Lauren,

0:26:22.560 --> 0:26:24.959
<v Speaker 1>have you ever thought about trying to match yourself up

0:26:25.000 --> 0:26:28.480
<v Speaker 1>with someone based upon your DNA and their DNA that

0:26:28.800 --> 0:26:31.840
<v Speaker 1>let's take the romance right out, Lauren. That's that sounds

0:26:31.840 --> 0:26:34.560
<v Speaker 1>like a statistically awful Aren't there laws about that? I mean,

0:26:34.680 --> 0:26:37.920
<v Speaker 1>there's a sounds like like an Eltis Huxley novel or something.

0:26:37.960 --> 0:26:41.320
<v Speaker 1>There's a there's a a service called Scientific Match that

0:26:41.400 --> 0:26:43.919
<v Speaker 1>tries to pair people up according to their DNA. Do

0:26:44.000 --> 0:26:46.320
<v Speaker 1>we okay, look y'all like like we we just figured

0:26:46.359 --> 0:26:49.200
<v Speaker 1>out this whole genome thing like like ten years ago.

0:26:49.400 --> 0:26:54.000
<v Speaker 1>I know, I'm going to be honest here. According to

0:26:54.040 --> 0:26:57.639
<v Speaker 1>Scientific Match, if you have a really good DNA match,

0:26:57.920 --> 0:27:02.520
<v Speaker 1>it supposedly it's the person better female orgasms, is what

0:27:02.560 --> 0:27:04.879
<v Speaker 1>I was trying to say, because that's that's how they

0:27:04.920 --> 0:27:07.720
<v Speaker 1>that's how they marketed as they say that a good

0:27:07.800 --> 0:27:12.800
<v Speaker 1>DNA match leads to more frequent and intense female orgasm.

0:27:12.880 --> 0:27:16.840
<v Speaker 1>What's your source on this Scientific Match that's their source.

0:27:18.480 --> 0:27:23.000
<v Speaker 1>That's what they're claiming. Okay, okay, hey, um so so

0:27:23.119 --> 0:27:26.679
<v Speaker 1>so sexual reproduction and health issues are that's I I

0:27:26.720 --> 0:27:30.000
<v Speaker 1>cannot even I think I need to laugh for another

0:27:30.040 --> 0:27:32.719
<v Speaker 1>about five minutes before I can talk about this serious.

0:27:33.520 --> 0:27:37.240
<v Speaker 1>That is so completely ludicrous that Okay, yeah, go ahead.

0:27:37.240 --> 0:27:40.120
<v Speaker 1>Another question. So their idea is you want to be

0:27:40.160 --> 0:27:43.720
<v Speaker 1>as genetically similar as that's what I said. I said

0:27:43.800 --> 0:27:46.919
<v Speaker 1>DNA match. They're matching you based on your DNA, not

0:27:47.040 --> 0:27:50.359
<v Speaker 1>that you are a perfect match on DNA. Then my

0:27:50.480 --> 0:27:53.280
<v Speaker 1>question would be, like, what is their rubric for making

0:27:53.280 --> 0:27:56.359
<v Speaker 1>the match? Because I don't think genetic similarity is what

0:27:56.400 --> 0:27:58.880
<v Speaker 1>you want to get. I don't imagine it's genetic similarity,

0:27:58.920 --> 0:28:01.040
<v Speaker 1>but I have no it's just like if your brother

0:28:01.119 --> 0:28:06.600
<v Speaker 1>is in the data base. Uh. And never mind the

0:28:07.800 --> 0:28:12.959
<v Speaker 1>yeah that I don't know specifically what they're they're there

0:28:13.600 --> 0:28:16.200
<v Speaker 1>method is like I don't know what it is. And

0:28:16.200 --> 0:28:18.080
<v Speaker 1>and no, none of these sites, by the way, none

0:28:18.119 --> 0:28:20.679
<v Speaker 1>of the sites were talking about scientific match or okay,

0:28:20.680 --> 0:28:22.920
<v Speaker 1>cubiter match dot com or any of the other ones

0:28:23.320 --> 0:28:27.120
<v Speaker 1>talk about their actual algorithms because that's their quote unquote

0:28:27.119 --> 0:28:30.840
<v Speaker 1>secret sauce. That's I'm skeptical of all this. It seems

0:28:30.840 --> 0:28:34.040
<v Speaker 1>shrouded in mystery and causes some of us to laugh. Joe,

0:28:34.560 --> 0:28:40.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, any any technology sufficiently advanced will seem as

0:28:40.440 --> 0:28:43.280
<v Speaker 1>if it were magic. Um, I would I would like

0:28:43.320 --> 0:28:45.760
<v Speaker 1>to I would like to put in, as the medical correspondent,

0:28:45.920 --> 0:28:49.360
<v Speaker 1>not only the single lady correspondent here today, that that

0:28:49.360 --> 0:28:51.440
<v Speaker 1>that that orgasms are not, in fact that be all

0:28:51.520 --> 0:28:53.640
<v Speaker 1>end all of any sexual encounter, and that that is

0:28:53.680 --> 0:28:58.240
<v Speaker 1>in fact a mistake that I think has been really

0:28:58.480 --> 0:29:01.600
<v Speaker 1>born of the increase in watching pornography. Not that I

0:29:01.600 --> 0:29:03.560
<v Speaker 1>think that that's a bad thing at all, but I

0:29:03.560 --> 0:29:06.000
<v Speaker 1>think that I think that there is perhaps more emphasis

0:29:06.000 --> 0:29:08.680
<v Speaker 1>than it's necessary on orgasm. I just wanted to put

0:29:08.680 --> 0:29:10.920
<v Speaker 1>that in. I see. So you're suggesting that perhaps people

0:29:10.960 --> 0:29:16.400
<v Speaker 1>have a realistic expectation exactly, and that much sexual pleasure

0:29:16.440 --> 0:29:19.120
<v Speaker 1>can be gained without organs. This also leads to This

0:29:19.200 --> 0:29:22.560
<v Speaker 1>also leads to the discussion that there are different people

0:29:22.560 --> 0:29:26.160
<v Speaker 1>have different motivations for looking at online dating, right, So

0:29:26.200 --> 0:29:30.040
<v Speaker 1>you have some people who are transition well, and that's

0:29:30.040 --> 0:29:32.120
<v Speaker 1>why I had that there. Actually, I mean, you know,

0:29:32.640 --> 0:29:34.600
<v Speaker 1>of course some of us are are twelve and are

0:29:34.640 --> 0:29:37.080
<v Speaker 1>all giggly. I'm counting myself there by the way, I've

0:29:37.120 --> 0:29:41.080
<v Speaker 1>just managing to hold it down through uh mostly a

0:29:41.200 --> 0:29:44.880
<v Speaker 1>lack of caffeine. Um. Anyway, there are different reasons for

0:29:44.960 --> 0:29:48.200
<v Speaker 1>people to pursue online dating. Some people are looking to

0:29:48.240 --> 0:29:51.320
<v Speaker 1>settle down. Some people want to find a long term relationship.

0:29:51.600 --> 0:29:54.320
<v Speaker 1>They want to find that special someone and they want

0:29:54.360 --> 0:29:57.360
<v Speaker 1>to be able to rely upon that person, and that's

0:29:57.400 --> 0:29:59.560
<v Speaker 1>that's what they're looking for. There are other people who

0:29:59.560 --> 0:30:02.160
<v Speaker 1>are using online dating in order to find the next

0:30:02.440 --> 0:30:05.600
<v Speaker 1>physical encounter, and that's that's all they are looking for,

0:30:05.720 --> 0:30:09.000
<v Speaker 1>or just for companionship in a temporary way, or um

0:30:09.120 --> 0:30:13.120
<v Speaker 1>for very temporary companionship. If they're you know, breezing through

0:30:13.120 --> 0:30:15.280
<v Speaker 1>a city and they just want to to to have

0:30:15.320 --> 0:30:17.800
<v Speaker 1>a conversation with somebody, or maybe they don't know what

0:30:17.840 --> 0:30:21.960
<v Speaker 1>they're looking for, that's also a possibility to something. Yeah.

0:30:22.120 --> 0:30:27.160
<v Speaker 1>So this makes creating those algorithms even more tricky because

0:30:27.240 --> 0:30:31.440
<v Speaker 1>let's say that you have uh, for example, men in general.

0:30:31.560 --> 0:30:34.240
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna talk about generalities here, but we're just talking

0:30:34.240 --> 0:30:37.200
<v Speaker 1>about general trends, not specific cases, because obviously we could

0:30:37.200 --> 0:30:40.440
<v Speaker 1>get anecdotal and this would go off the rails. But

0:30:40.560 --> 0:30:45.120
<v Speaker 1>men in general tend to be more likely to be

0:30:45.200 --> 0:30:48.800
<v Speaker 1>looking for a quick physical encounter than women, and they

0:30:48.880 --> 0:30:52.400
<v Speaker 1>tend to send a lot of messages out in order

0:30:52.400 --> 0:30:54.800
<v Speaker 1>to essentially casting out a lot of lines to try

0:30:54.840 --> 0:30:59.800
<v Speaker 1>and get a bite. Also in in certainly in modern

0:31:00.000 --> 0:31:02.720
<v Speaker 1>stern society, men are generally seen as the aggressors in

0:31:02.720 --> 0:31:07.160
<v Speaker 1>a relationship and the initiators the initiators, right right, Yeah,

0:31:07.160 --> 0:31:10.960
<v Speaker 1>aggressor from mathias a strong word. Um, but in women,

0:31:11.000 --> 0:31:15.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, even from my personal sample size of one,

0:31:15.040 --> 0:31:17.640
<v Speaker 1>I have seen a lot of friends, you know, even

0:31:17.760 --> 0:31:22.800
<v Speaker 1>my absolute most feminist modern out there. Why could do friends?

0:31:23.000 --> 0:31:27.360
<v Speaker 1>Um uh talking you know, asking like is it okay

0:31:27.400 --> 0:31:29.440
<v Speaker 1>if I ask a dude on a date? Like it

0:31:29.240 --> 0:31:32.120
<v Speaker 1>is it okay? If I ask a dude on a date?

0:31:32.160 --> 0:31:34.120
<v Speaker 1>What will he think of me? Yeah, it's not okay

0:31:34.120 --> 0:31:36.040
<v Speaker 1>to do it to me because my wife would kill you.

0:31:37.280 --> 0:31:40.240
<v Speaker 1>So I don't even think about it. But yeah, no,

0:31:40.360 --> 0:31:43.440
<v Speaker 1>I I understand that entirely because it happen. No, it

0:31:43.440 --> 0:31:46.520
<v Speaker 1>would never, It wouldn't have happened anyway. Uh, which is

0:31:46.600 --> 0:31:49.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm perfectly fine with. I'm a happily married me. But

0:31:49.880 --> 0:31:52.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think that it's still a societal UM question.

0:31:53.120 --> 0:31:56.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how people contact each other well, because

0:31:56.720 --> 0:31:59.959
<v Speaker 1>we definitely have we definitely have things in the Western society.

0:32:00.040 --> 0:32:03.840
<v Speaker 1>We definitely have certain certain norms that are you know,

0:32:03.920 --> 0:32:08.040
<v Speaker 1>norms change over time, but they change very gradually. Well,

0:32:08.240 --> 0:32:11.120
<v Speaker 1>that leads me to an interesting question, then, uh, is

0:32:11.640 --> 0:32:16.840
<v Speaker 1>online dating changing these norms? Oh? I would feel like

0:32:16.840 --> 0:32:19.000
<v Speaker 1>it's spent a lot of a lot of change and

0:32:19.200 --> 0:32:22.120
<v Speaker 1>or or a lot of changing perception. There's at least

0:32:22.160 --> 0:32:26.160
<v Speaker 1>an increased level of awareness I think now I wouldn't.

0:32:26.160 --> 0:32:28.560
<v Speaker 1>I would say that's not changing nearly fast enough. I

0:32:28.560 --> 0:32:31.360
<v Speaker 1>mean just based upon things like getting outside the dating

0:32:31.720 --> 0:32:35.640
<v Speaker 1>scheme entirely, but just looking at things like rampant misogyny

0:32:35.680 --> 0:32:40.480
<v Speaker 1>online tells me that things are actually not even as

0:32:40.720 --> 0:32:45.640
<v Speaker 1>um advanced advanced as I had thoughts. Yeah, that that

0:32:45.720 --> 0:32:47.920
<v Speaker 1>even if people are saying I'm just joking to think

0:32:47.920 --> 0:32:51.120
<v Speaker 1>that that's something okay to joke about, it suggests to

0:32:51.160 --> 0:32:54.400
<v Speaker 1>me that that I was very naive and thinking that

0:32:54.440 --> 0:32:57.480
<v Speaker 1>we were further along than that. But the Internet also

0:32:57.840 --> 0:33:00.800
<v Speaker 1>you can with that specific example, I think you could

0:33:00.840 --> 0:33:04.200
<v Speaker 1>argue UM gives people an opportunity to say things that

0:33:04.240 --> 0:33:07.200
<v Speaker 1>they know full well they would never say in public

0:33:07.200 --> 0:33:09.680
<v Speaker 1>where they can get punched, right, But that just shows

0:33:09.840 --> 0:33:13.600
<v Speaker 1>that just shows that that's the underlying that's this underlying

0:33:13.800 --> 0:33:16.440
<v Speaker 1>problem though, right. It just it means that sure it

0:33:16.520 --> 0:33:19.360
<v Speaker 1>wasn't voiced maybe as often before the Internet, but it

0:33:19.400 --> 0:33:21.520
<v Speaker 1>was certainly there. It just wasn't it didn't have a

0:33:21.600 --> 0:33:24.520
<v Speaker 1>voice before. But that doesn't mean that there was an absence. Yeah,

0:33:24.600 --> 0:33:27.080
<v Speaker 1>And I think that sometimes an unfortunately, like one of

0:33:27.120 --> 0:33:29.600
<v Speaker 1>the unfortunate side effects of all the data that these

0:33:29.680 --> 0:33:33.480
<v Speaker 1>kinds of dating sites gather is that people use them

0:33:33.560 --> 0:33:38.160
<v Speaker 1>to to further attempt to illustrate a gender divide on

0:33:38.280 --> 0:33:40.240
<v Speaker 1>issues like like a lot of the time, because we're

0:33:40.280 --> 0:33:43.760
<v Speaker 1>collecting all of this personal data about people in this

0:33:43.880 --> 0:33:47.760
<v Speaker 1>dating situation that is on many sites by and large,

0:33:48.320 --> 0:33:52.880
<v Speaker 1>straight hetersexual male female um that people use that to

0:33:52.960 --> 0:33:57.840
<v Speaker 1>make assumptions about women and about men that are are

0:33:57.960 --> 0:34:03.080
<v Speaker 1>really they're not necessarily realistic, They necessarily reflect the certainly

0:34:03.160 --> 0:34:06.040
<v Speaker 1>not helpful. All right, Yeah, well, you know, I mean

0:34:06.040 --> 0:34:08.279
<v Speaker 1>they may be to the users at that site who

0:34:08.280 --> 0:34:11.680
<v Speaker 1>are looking for a heterosexual relationship. But there are some

0:34:11.719 --> 0:34:14.640
<v Speaker 1>other problems with this big data issue. One of them is,

0:34:14.760 --> 0:34:17.400
<v Speaker 1>of course, something we've talked about before on this podcast

0:34:17.400 --> 0:34:20.200
<v Speaker 1>with other things where you get lots and lots of

0:34:20.239 --> 0:34:24.120
<v Speaker 1>options opened up called the tyranny of choice. That concept

0:34:24.120 --> 0:34:26.719
<v Speaker 1>that when you have so many options that you don't

0:34:26.840 --> 0:34:29.040
<v Speaker 1>know where to start, or that you it gives you

0:34:29.080 --> 0:34:32.719
<v Speaker 1>an illusion that you have, uh, you know, you have

0:34:32.840 --> 0:34:35.600
<v Speaker 1>to go with quote unquote the best choice. But the

0:34:35.640 --> 0:34:38.279
<v Speaker 1>best choice is something that you're defining in your own head.

0:34:38.360 --> 0:34:41.000
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't necessarily mean that the person you end up

0:34:41.000 --> 0:34:43.799
<v Speaker 1>sending a message to is actually your best match. You

0:34:43.920 --> 0:34:46.680
<v Speaker 1>might be going by your own set of criteria and

0:34:46.760 --> 0:34:49.880
<v Speaker 1>not even realize that you're passing up the opportunity to

0:34:49.920 --> 0:34:52.759
<v Speaker 1>meet someone that could genuinely make you very happy wow

0:34:53.000 --> 0:34:55.799
<v Speaker 1>or yeah. Yeah. You can even have this sort of

0:34:55.840 --> 0:34:59.160
<v Speaker 1>like constant sense of dissatisfaction with whoever you end up

0:34:59.200 --> 0:35:01.799
<v Speaker 1>with because you have this lingering idea that I hope,

0:35:01.800 --> 0:35:03.759
<v Speaker 1>but there's so many other people in my inbox and

0:35:03.920 --> 0:35:05.680
<v Speaker 1>I've gone to the next dial over. I might have

0:35:05.719 --> 0:35:09.840
<v Speaker 1>found the best girlfriends and this one's pretty darn good,

0:35:09.880 --> 0:35:12.080
<v Speaker 1>but I bet the next one would have been even better,

0:35:12.160 --> 0:35:13.719
<v Speaker 1>And now you know what am I going to do?

0:35:13.760 --> 0:35:17.160
<v Speaker 1>And that there's also the issue of trading up the

0:35:17.200 --> 0:35:20.000
<v Speaker 1>idea that you will start dating one person for a while,

0:35:20.040 --> 0:35:22.520
<v Speaker 1>but if you see someone better online, you will then

0:35:23.000 --> 0:35:25.560
<v Speaker 1>dump the first person and start dating the second person.

0:35:26.320 --> 0:35:29.239
<v Speaker 1>There there's some psychologists who have said that this ends

0:35:29.320 --> 0:35:32.920
<v Speaker 1>up essentially reducing people to the role of products. That

0:35:33.000 --> 0:35:36.279
<v Speaker 1>instead of thinking of, uh at someone on the other

0:35:36.400 --> 0:35:39.839
<v Speaker 1>end as a potential a person you could potentially date

0:35:39.960 --> 0:35:42.480
<v Speaker 1>and form a relationship with someone that you could have

0:35:42.520 --> 0:35:46.240
<v Speaker 1>a meaningful relationship with, it's you know, your next step

0:35:46.280 --> 0:35:50.799
<v Speaker 1>to the perfect mate, whatever that might be in your mind. Right.

0:35:51.000 --> 0:35:53.200
<v Speaker 1>Although I do want to put in that that matchmaking

0:35:53.400 --> 0:35:57.239
<v Speaker 1>and even mediated self matchmaking is not a new thing.

0:35:57.280 --> 0:36:00.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, people can take out newspaper personals. It's it's

0:36:00.239 --> 0:36:05.040
<v Speaker 1>the mid ninete century. Uh and and even even before then,

0:36:05.120 --> 0:36:08.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, I I would assume that that in some

0:36:08.200 --> 0:36:12.120
<v Speaker 1>way debutante announcements or something like that would be very

0:36:12.280 --> 0:36:14.960
<v Speaker 1>structured in in this in this like check out what

0:36:15.200 --> 0:36:18.759
<v Speaker 1>this nice lady? Yes, and you know, look how rich

0:36:18.800 --> 0:36:22.359
<v Speaker 1>her family is. Yeah. The other issue, the other side

0:36:22.360 --> 0:36:24.640
<v Speaker 1>of that coin, the idea of trading up that you know,

0:36:26.239 --> 0:36:30.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna keep looking even though I found someone right now. Uh.

0:36:30.360 --> 0:36:33.000
<v Speaker 1>First of all, going into the idea that the person

0:36:33.040 --> 0:36:35.920
<v Speaker 1>that you connect with needs is going to be the

0:36:36.000 --> 0:36:39.520
<v Speaker 1>one is as just as dangerous a mindset right to

0:36:39.640 --> 0:36:42.240
<v Speaker 1>think that, oh, well, I found this person, the computer

0:36:42.280 --> 0:36:44.640
<v Speaker 1>says we're a great match. Therefore everything's going to work

0:36:44.640 --> 0:36:48.160
<v Speaker 1>out perfectly. That's not how reality works. So there tends

0:36:48.200 --> 0:36:50.520
<v Speaker 1>to be this real disconnect. And in fact, Chris Coin,

0:36:50.600 --> 0:36:52.719
<v Speaker 1>who was one of the founders of okay Cupid, told

0:36:52.719 --> 0:36:55.600
<v Speaker 1>The New Yorker that it's a selection problem when you

0:36:55.680 --> 0:36:58.200
<v Speaker 1>round up a bunch of people who want to settle down.

0:36:58.600 --> 0:37:01.439
<v Speaker 1>Some of them are really really key, so they will

0:37:01.680 --> 0:37:06.120
<v Speaker 1>just turn down options that might have been fantastic for them.

0:37:06.440 --> 0:37:09.120
<v Speaker 1>Others are not picky enough, and after they get maybe

0:37:09.120 --> 0:37:11.360
<v Speaker 1>one message, they're like, all right, I gotta jump on

0:37:11.400 --> 0:37:13.359
<v Speaker 1>this because who knows, you know, I may never have

0:37:13.719 --> 0:37:18.120
<v Speaker 1>this opportunity again. And it's this get burnt out potentially

0:37:18.200 --> 0:37:21.719
<v Speaker 1>be based on poor experiences. Yeah, both both types of

0:37:21.760 --> 0:37:25.200
<v Speaker 1>individuals could end up being very much unsatisfied in the

0:37:25.280 --> 0:37:28.520
<v Speaker 1>long run because of this these tendencies. So, and it's

0:37:28.520 --> 0:37:31.319
<v Speaker 1>it's difficult to tell someone who you know, they they

0:37:31.400 --> 0:37:33.359
<v Speaker 1>feel like there's something missing in their life and they

0:37:33.400 --> 0:37:37.120
<v Speaker 1>want to find that it's really hard to say, Hey,

0:37:37.320 --> 0:37:40.000
<v Speaker 1>slow it down, you know dat a few people see

0:37:40.000 --> 0:37:42.200
<v Speaker 1>what see who out there is a good match, learn

0:37:42.239 --> 0:37:45.040
<v Speaker 1>more about them, learn about yourself in the process, and

0:37:45.080 --> 0:37:47.400
<v Speaker 1>that's going to make you the happiest when you're like, no,

0:37:47.800 --> 0:37:49.600
<v Speaker 1>I have a hole in my heart right now and

0:37:49.640 --> 0:37:51.600
<v Speaker 1>it goes all the way to China. Hey, I should

0:37:51.680 --> 0:37:55.640
<v Speaker 1>use that as my quote. Well, okay, so I feel

0:37:55.640 --> 0:38:00.359
<v Speaker 1>like so far we have taken maybe an unduly kind

0:38:00.360 --> 0:38:03.799
<v Speaker 1>of skeptical or negative tone when I don't think that

0:38:03.840 --> 0:38:05.839
<v Speaker 1>was our intention, not at all. It kind of came

0:38:05.920 --> 0:38:08.239
<v Speaker 1>up with the genetic matching and stuff like that. I

0:38:08.520 --> 0:38:12.360
<v Speaker 1>I wanna say that I think online dating provides a

0:38:12.400 --> 0:38:16.839
<v Speaker 1>lot of opportunities for people, especially I would imagine people who,

0:38:17.040 --> 0:38:20.080
<v Speaker 1>um say, are looking for someone that they might be

0:38:20.200 --> 0:38:23.839
<v Speaker 1>unlikely to find in their home social circle. Sure, I mean, well,

0:38:23.880 --> 0:38:26.959
<v Speaker 1>one thing, it can extend at home social circle well

0:38:27.000 --> 0:38:29.920
<v Speaker 1>outside of what that would normally be. So, for example,

0:38:30.280 --> 0:38:32.760
<v Speaker 1>we're here in Atlanta. There are a lot of different

0:38:32.760 --> 0:38:35.319
<v Speaker 1>places in the metropolitan Atlanta area. I mean there's something

0:38:35.360 --> 0:38:38.880
<v Speaker 1>like thirteen counties in the metropolitan Atlanta area. Uh. And

0:38:38.920 --> 0:38:40.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know about you guys, but I don't tend

0:38:40.640 --> 0:38:43.680
<v Speaker 1>to venture out of two of those. So, uh, so

0:38:43.840 --> 0:38:45.680
<v Speaker 1>that the thing is that that might give you the

0:38:45.680 --> 0:38:48.400
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to meet people that otherwise your social circle just

0:38:48.480 --> 0:38:51.720
<v Speaker 1>never would overlap with. You know, that's the that's a possibility.

0:38:51.760 --> 0:38:54.839
<v Speaker 1>But then on top of that, there's also, um, well,

0:38:54.840 --> 0:38:57.839
<v Speaker 1>there have been a couple of studies about how frequently

0:38:58.560 --> 0:39:01.919
<v Speaker 1>these sort of things, like how frequently online meeting someone

0:39:02.000 --> 0:39:06.080
<v Speaker 1>online accounts for the way you met your date. Although

0:39:06.080 --> 0:39:09.200
<v Speaker 1>I should say that these surveys are almost always commissioned

0:39:09.239 --> 0:39:12.759
<v Speaker 1>by some company that owns a dating site, so there's

0:39:12.760 --> 0:39:16.359
<v Speaker 1>a question of bias there obviously. But one of them,

0:39:16.360 --> 0:39:19.759
<v Speaker 1>for example, said that meeting people online is now the

0:39:19.880 --> 0:39:23.360
<v Speaker 1>third most common way for people to meet for dating,

0:39:23.880 --> 0:39:27.160
<v Speaker 1>So after work in school would be number one, and

0:39:27.200 --> 0:39:29.480
<v Speaker 1>being introduced by friends or family would be number two.

0:39:30.320 --> 0:39:34.799
<v Speaker 1>So which that makes sense? Something, what are the others, like,

0:39:34.880 --> 0:39:37.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, going out to some place like a bar

0:39:37.920 --> 0:39:40.719
<v Speaker 1>or all right, all right now, or uh, you know,

0:39:40.760 --> 0:39:44.560
<v Speaker 1>wandering aimlessly through neighborhoods. Um, that's what I tried in

0:39:44.600 --> 0:39:48.279
<v Speaker 1>my teenage years. Did not work. Well, yeah, I don't

0:39:48.320 --> 0:39:51.680
<v Speaker 1>recommend it, uh, but you know, it's it's it's a

0:39:51.680 --> 0:39:54.120
<v Speaker 1>method of mass communication, and anytime that you have one

0:39:54.120 --> 0:39:56.440
<v Speaker 1>of those, of course people are going to and and

0:39:56.680 --> 0:39:58.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, like like many other things, you get out

0:39:58.480 --> 0:40:00.279
<v Speaker 1>of it what you put into it. Really at the

0:40:00.360 --> 0:40:03.040
<v Speaker 1>end of the day, I think, sure, yeah, well, and

0:40:03.080 --> 0:40:06.080
<v Speaker 1>also it's also there are other things as well. There's

0:40:06.120 --> 0:40:08.399
<v Speaker 1>there's a real issue A lot of people point out

0:40:08.400 --> 0:40:11.440
<v Speaker 1>an issue with the way that these dating sites make money.

0:40:11.480 --> 0:40:13.360
<v Speaker 1>Some of them are subscription based, so you pay a

0:40:13.400 --> 0:40:15.280
<v Speaker 1>certain amount per month in order to be a member.

0:40:15.600 --> 0:40:18.640
<v Speaker 1>Others are ad revenue based, and so it's a free service,

0:40:18.719 --> 0:40:22.000
<v Speaker 1>but they get ad revenue and they possibly are using

0:40:22.000 --> 0:40:23.800
<v Speaker 1>your information as part of that sort of like the

0:40:23.840 --> 0:40:27.239
<v Speaker 1>way possibly yeah, well I'd say possibly only because I

0:40:27.280 --> 0:40:29.160
<v Speaker 1>can't cover all of them, so there maybe one out

0:40:29.200 --> 0:40:32.880
<v Speaker 1>there that doesn't. But in general, uh, these are the

0:40:32.880 --> 0:40:35.080
<v Speaker 1>ways they're making money, and some people have said that

0:40:35.160 --> 0:40:38.680
<v Speaker 1>really there's a disconnect there. There's a disconnect between the

0:40:38.719 --> 0:40:41.600
<v Speaker 1>way they're making money and whether or not they're actually

0:40:41.600 --> 0:40:44.520
<v Speaker 1>providing a successful service. So in other words, they're making

0:40:44.520 --> 0:40:47.520
<v Speaker 1>money whether or not the matches themselves are working. So

0:40:47.560 --> 0:40:51.160
<v Speaker 1>there's a disconnect between performance and revenue. If their revenue

0:40:51.200 --> 0:40:54.640
<v Speaker 1>were tied directly to successful matchmaking. Then it would be

0:40:54.640 --> 0:40:57.360
<v Speaker 1>a totally different thing, and you would have these companies

0:40:57.400 --> 0:40:59.839
<v Speaker 1>have to really try and figure out how to make

0:40:59.840 --> 0:41:02.560
<v Speaker 1>that you know, when when when when do they when?

0:41:02.560 --> 0:41:04.319
<v Speaker 1>When do you ask someone to pay you, like, like

0:41:04.360 --> 0:41:06.160
<v Speaker 1>when they're walking down the aisle, like you get a

0:41:06.160 --> 0:41:11.680
<v Speaker 1>textification in. But see, that's the thing is that it's

0:41:11.680 --> 0:41:13.799
<v Speaker 1>not that it's not that they're doing something wrong, it's

0:41:13.840 --> 0:41:17.439
<v Speaker 1>that the model itself doesn't work in that sense. There's

0:41:17.520 --> 0:41:20.879
<v Speaker 1>no incentive to get it right other than you don't

0:41:20.960 --> 0:41:23.640
<v Speaker 1>want to have customers just say I'm not going to

0:41:23.719 --> 0:41:26.600
<v Speaker 1>pay for this anymore. So the problem though, is that

0:41:26.800 --> 0:41:28.800
<v Speaker 1>it's just by the very nature of the business, there's

0:41:28.840 --> 0:41:32.600
<v Speaker 1>no connection between your your your product, and your revenue

0:41:32.680 --> 0:41:34.640
<v Speaker 1>in for I mean, you know, in one of these

0:41:34.680 --> 0:41:37.920
<v Speaker 1>companies eyes, a very satisfied customer is the same thing

0:41:38.000 --> 0:41:40.799
<v Speaker 1>as an extremely dissatisfied customer. Either way, they're not coming

0:41:40.840 --> 0:41:44.240
<v Speaker 1>back to the site. Well, yeah, I would almost argue

0:41:44.280 --> 0:41:47.560
<v Speaker 1>that it would seem, just from an outsider's point of view,

0:41:47.560 --> 0:41:52.160
<v Speaker 1>that the most uh the most productive business model for

0:41:52.200 --> 0:41:55.480
<v Speaker 1>them would be to create a very engaging experience that

0:41:55.560 --> 0:41:58.520
<v Speaker 1>keeps people returning, right so that they get matched with

0:41:58.520 --> 0:42:01.560
<v Speaker 1>people who are almost but not quite right for them. Yeah,

0:42:01.840 --> 0:42:04.840
<v Speaker 1>so that they continuous like, well, well it was nice

0:42:04.920 --> 0:42:09.759
<v Speaker 1>or he was nice, but it just didn't work with

0:42:09.840 --> 0:42:13.920
<v Speaker 1>the Twitter or Facebook kind of, you know, the scrolling

0:42:14.000 --> 0:42:17.200
<v Speaker 1>feed model. Like really, all you have to do is

0:42:17.280 --> 0:42:20.560
<v Speaker 1>to create a site experience that people are going to

0:42:20.600 --> 0:42:24.080
<v Speaker 1>be very glued to. Now here's the question for you.

0:42:24.560 --> 0:42:28.200
<v Speaker 1>Do you know what demographic is the fastest growing demographic

0:42:28.239 --> 0:42:31.440
<v Speaker 1>for online dating sites? I would guess or did you know?

0:42:31.520 --> 0:42:35.920
<v Speaker 1>I would guess retired persons. Yeah, over fifty. That's because

0:42:35.920 --> 0:42:38.759
<v Speaker 1>you've got a generation of you know, people who are

0:42:38.840 --> 0:42:41.759
<v Speaker 1>entering that age who are already computer savvy. Because when

0:42:41.760 --> 0:42:43.600
<v Speaker 1>you look at previous generations, there were people who are

0:42:43.600 --> 0:42:45.560
<v Speaker 1>like I don't know how this works, but now we've

0:42:45.560 --> 0:42:47.680
<v Speaker 1>got people who have been using them. And the early

0:42:47.680 --> 0:42:50.160
<v Speaker 1>adopters of these services I assume would have been people

0:42:50.200 --> 0:42:53.520
<v Speaker 1>in the in the set probably yeah, I would imagine. So.

0:42:53.560 --> 0:42:55.879
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, the fastest growing And keep in mind it's

0:42:55.880 --> 0:42:59.280
<v Speaker 1>the fastest growing demographic, It doesn't necessarily mean that they dominate.

0:42:59.360 --> 0:43:01.440
<v Speaker 1>It just means there are the there are numbers, are

0:43:01.440 --> 0:43:04.719
<v Speaker 1>the ones that are growing the fastest. And also I

0:43:04.760 --> 0:43:06.920
<v Speaker 1>thought I'd talked about one other thing. It's a little

0:43:06.920 --> 0:43:10.399
<v Speaker 1>bit of a duplicitous tactic that some dating sites use

0:43:10.840 --> 0:43:15.279
<v Speaker 1>called ghosting. Ghosting, Yeah, that sounds creepy. So ghosting is

0:43:15.400 --> 0:43:20.319
<v Speaker 1>where the dating site creates some fake profiles in order

0:43:20.400 --> 0:43:23.640
<v Speaker 1>to lure people to use the service. So, in other words,

0:43:23.640 --> 0:43:27.040
<v Speaker 1>they might take a picture of a particularly attractive person

0:43:27.520 --> 0:43:30.160
<v Speaker 1>and create a profile that makes them seem like a

0:43:30.200 --> 0:43:32.600
<v Speaker 1>pretty good person, a pretty nice match, and they use

0:43:32.680 --> 0:43:35.600
<v Speaker 1>that as the advertising for the site so that people

0:43:35.600 --> 0:43:38.800
<v Speaker 1>will go and subscribe to it and look for people

0:43:38.840 --> 0:43:40.360
<v Speaker 1>like the one they saw in the ad. You know,

0:43:40.400 --> 0:43:43.840
<v Speaker 1>a pretty person who's like I really like music and dogs.

0:43:45.080 --> 0:43:48.479
<v Speaker 1>I like dogs who play music. Yeah, I mean that's

0:43:48.760 --> 0:43:51.520
<v Speaker 1>and so it's it's something that a lot of sites use.

0:43:51.600 --> 0:43:54.360
<v Speaker 1>In fact, I don't have the name of the site

0:43:54.360 --> 0:43:56.360
<v Speaker 1>in front of me. I just remember this from reading

0:43:56.440 --> 0:43:59.759
<v Speaker 1>the article that there was one site that had something

0:43:59.800 --> 0:44:03.360
<v Speaker 1>like thirteen hundred fake profiles on it in an attempt

0:44:03.360 --> 0:44:06.720
<v Speaker 1>to get people to use the service. I'm totally skeezed

0:44:06.719 --> 0:44:09.839
<v Speaker 1>out right now. Yeah, that's one thing that I think

0:44:09.840 --> 0:44:12.839
<v Speaker 1>would be interesting to look into, would be to use

0:44:12.920 --> 0:44:15.840
<v Speaker 1>these sites not for just information about the sites, but

0:44:15.920 --> 0:44:20.360
<v Speaker 1>about dating in general, So like, is there a certain

0:44:20.360 --> 0:44:23.919
<v Speaker 1>facial expression people make in profile pictures that is more

0:44:23.960 --> 0:44:26.360
<v Speaker 1>likely to get clicked on? Or I think that it

0:44:26.480 --> 0:44:29.480
<v Speaker 1>all ends up being very much. You know, obviously I

0:44:29.480 --> 0:44:32.040
<v Speaker 1>would say that there there's some that I think would

0:44:32.280 --> 0:44:35.319
<v Speaker 1>discourage clicking. So for example, furrowed brow with blood all

0:44:35.360 --> 0:44:37.000
<v Speaker 1>over your face is probably a big no no for

0:44:37.040 --> 0:44:39.320
<v Speaker 1>a large percentage of the population. I don't know that.

0:44:40.560 --> 0:44:42.239
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's kind of That's kind of the point

0:44:42.239 --> 0:44:44.000
<v Speaker 1>I was about to make, though, Joe, is that I

0:44:44.040 --> 0:44:47.319
<v Speaker 1>think that I don't think there's like the universal this

0:44:47.440 --> 0:44:49.520
<v Speaker 1>is the thing that's going to get the clicks I want,

0:44:49.560 --> 0:44:54.120
<v Speaker 1>because there'd be and there would be curves, there would

0:44:54.160 --> 0:44:57.040
<v Speaker 1>be within certain social segments and and different demographics. So

0:44:57.040 --> 0:44:58.640
<v Speaker 1>in other words, you would sit there and look like

0:44:58.680 --> 0:45:01.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking for someone who belongs to this particular demographic.

0:45:01.400 --> 0:45:04.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to see what this particular demographic statistically responds to,

0:45:04.560 --> 0:45:06.879
<v Speaker 1>and then I'm going to recreate that in picture. Well,

0:45:06.920 --> 0:45:08.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if I'm going to be a tiny bit

0:45:09.200 --> 0:45:13.399
<v Speaker 1>culturally insensitive, you know, For for example, I I'm looking

0:45:13.440 --> 0:45:16.640
<v Speaker 1>for someone who I think is going to be basically

0:45:16.680 --> 0:45:19.720
<v Speaker 1>like myself, which is like kind of nerdy and maybe

0:45:19.760 --> 0:45:24.879
<v Speaker 1>like go team unphysically fit, and you know, and and

0:45:25.200 --> 0:45:28.120
<v Speaker 1>someone who is a real affinity for cupcakes. You know,

0:45:29.440 --> 0:45:31.600
<v Speaker 1>so yeah, yeah, and and well but you know, and

0:45:31.640 --> 0:45:34.799
<v Speaker 1>so so if someone has all the muscles and a

0:45:34.880 --> 0:45:38.040
<v Speaker 1>really fake tan, I might go not that person, not

0:45:38.200 --> 0:45:40.360
<v Speaker 1>that person at all. But but that might be exactly

0:45:40.360 --> 0:45:42.280
<v Speaker 1>what somebody else is looking at. Well, and and there

0:45:42.280 --> 0:45:44.280
<v Speaker 1>there is something else I saw that was kind of interesting.

0:45:44.280 --> 0:45:46.160
<v Speaker 1>And again I don't have this. I didn't write down

0:45:46.200 --> 0:45:49.600
<v Speaker 1>the research here, so I apologize. But it was interesting

0:45:49.640 --> 0:45:52.240
<v Speaker 1>in that it was another one of those general generalities

0:45:52.600 --> 0:45:57.200
<v Speaker 1>where generally women liked men's pictures where they weren't looking

0:45:57.239 --> 0:46:00.160
<v Speaker 1>directly into the camera, and men liked women's picture is

0:46:00.160 --> 0:46:02.759
<v Speaker 1>where they were looking directly into the camera. And the

0:46:02.840 --> 0:46:05.440
<v Speaker 1>armchair psychology response, because this is something else that we

0:46:05.480 --> 0:46:07.440
<v Speaker 1>all discussed before we start recording this, is that a

0:46:07.480 --> 0:46:10.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of the quote unquote research in this field are

0:46:10.640 --> 0:46:13.680
<v Speaker 1>bloggers just saying I think this is the case. But

0:46:13.800 --> 0:46:16.719
<v Speaker 1>in this case, the armchair research was that perhaps a

0:46:17.680 --> 0:46:20.480
<v Speaker 1>direct gaze into the camera by a man would be

0:46:20.520 --> 0:46:25.879
<v Speaker 1>seen as aggressive to buy a woman, whereas men looking

0:46:25.920 --> 0:46:27.680
<v Speaker 1>at women looking directly in the camera, I feel like

0:46:27.719 --> 0:46:30.920
<v Speaker 1>their entire attention has been focused upon them, which men love.

0:46:31.239 --> 0:46:33.080
<v Speaker 1>These are the generalities that were being said in that

0:46:33.080 --> 0:46:38.440
<v Speaker 1>particular article. That sounds like an interpretation. Yeah, it doesn't

0:46:38.440 --> 0:46:41.000
<v Speaker 1>mean that. It doesn't necessarily mean that they are you know,

0:46:41.040 --> 0:46:45.200
<v Speaker 1>invalid or valid. It just means that I don't know this. Yeah, yeah,

0:46:45.520 --> 0:46:47.880
<v Speaker 1>this is a very We talked about hard sciences and

0:46:47.880 --> 0:46:51.920
<v Speaker 1>soft sciences. This one is uh, anytime they've got psychology

0:46:51.960 --> 0:46:56.120
<v Speaker 1>and yeah, this is this is a little yeah. And also, again,

0:46:56.160 --> 0:46:57.680
<v Speaker 1>like we said, it's hard to get a it's hard

0:46:57.719 --> 0:47:01.399
<v Speaker 1>to get a study funded that isn't funded directly by

0:47:01.440 --> 0:47:04.880
<v Speaker 1>one of the interested parties that has a vested interest

0:47:04.920 --> 0:47:08.120
<v Speaker 1>in the outcome of that study. Right, So if there

0:47:08.120 --> 0:47:10.200
<v Speaker 1>were more independent studies that we could look at that

0:47:10.239 --> 0:47:13.480
<v Speaker 1>were you know, funded and completely independently so that we

0:47:13.520 --> 0:47:16.040
<v Speaker 1>could feel better about the research, or if they had

0:47:16.080 --> 0:47:18.000
<v Speaker 1>more than you know, a couple of hundreds of people

0:47:18.040 --> 0:47:20.640
<v Speaker 1>in their sample size, then maybe we could cite that.

0:47:20.680 --> 0:47:23.719
<v Speaker 1>But you know, not that many people have a really

0:47:23.760 --> 0:47:28.840
<v Speaker 1>tackled it. I think it's due for an ignoble personally. So, um,

0:47:28.920 --> 0:47:32.040
<v Speaker 1>what's the future of dating? Dating? And technology twenty to

0:47:32.120 --> 0:47:35.759
<v Speaker 1>fifty years years. Based on everything we've said, we'll all

0:47:35.760 --> 0:47:38.200
<v Speaker 1>be in the singularity and so it won't matter. We'll

0:47:38.239 --> 0:47:42.400
<v Speaker 1>all have robot boyfriends and girlfriends. Here's a question. So

0:47:42.520 --> 0:47:44.600
<v Speaker 1>imagine we get to some of these other things we've

0:47:44.600 --> 0:47:49.200
<v Speaker 1>talked about, like a negligible senescence. Uh, and you're living

0:47:49.320 --> 0:47:52.799
<v Speaker 1>for you know, everybody's living for hundreds of years or

0:47:52.840 --> 0:47:55.960
<v Speaker 1>something like that. Does that change relationships and dating? I mean,

0:47:56.000 --> 0:47:59.120
<v Speaker 1>do people get married because they're like, well, it'll be

0:47:59.200 --> 0:48:05.920
<v Speaker 1>this many years. They have to endure her company for

0:48:06.600 --> 0:48:09.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe fifty years? Seriously, I mean, I mean, you know

0:48:09.040 --> 0:48:11.399
<v Speaker 1>a bit based on the documentary work of Say and Rice,

0:48:11.480 --> 0:48:14.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, those those long term relationships don't necessarily work out.

0:48:15.600 --> 0:48:24.440
<v Speaker 1>But uh, you know, I think that and and different

0:48:24.520 --> 0:48:28.160
<v Speaker 1>different futurists have talked about that very thing, about whether

0:48:28.280 --> 0:48:31.879
<v Speaker 1>or not relationships would be a lifelong mating situation if

0:48:32.000 --> 0:48:35.600
<v Speaker 1>lifelong equals three hundred years, because don't you eventually get

0:48:35.600 --> 0:48:39.000
<v Speaker 1>sick of someone or you know, or might you decide

0:48:39.080 --> 0:48:42.320
<v Speaker 1>that the way that you can learn about many different

0:48:42.360 --> 0:48:45.799
<v Speaker 1>disciplines over the course of your extremely long lifetime, maybe

0:48:45.800 --> 0:48:48.759
<v Speaker 1>you want to have many different relationship experiences, or or

0:48:48.840 --> 0:48:51.600
<v Speaker 1>just that the fact that people do change over time,

0:48:51.680 --> 0:48:53.480
<v Speaker 1>and so that then it comes to that whole thing,

0:48:53.480 --> 0:48:55.680
<v Speaker 1>do you grow together or do you grow apart the

0:48:55.760 --> 0:48:58.160
<v Speaker 1>idea that if you have two people who were very

0:48:58.239 --> 0:49:01.120
<v Speaker 1>much compatible early on in the relations and ship and

0:49:01.160 --> 0:49:05.239
<v Speaker 1>their compatibility decreases over time, then what happens. I mean,

0:49:05.239 --> 0:49:08.080
<v Speaker 1>it's like there'll be like standard units of matrimony, like

0:49:08.120 --> 0:49:11.279
<v Speaker 1>your average marriage is a is a contract that is

0:49:11.400 --> 0:49:14.960
<v Speaker 1>designed from the beginning to last seventy years. Please make weddings,

0:49:15.320 --> 0:49:17.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, try and reverse the trend of making weddings

0:49:18.040 --> 0:49:21.560
<v Speaker 1>less and less romantic over time. I'm kind of sick

0:49:21.600 --> 0:49:24.680
<v Speaker 1>of it going to a wedding where I'm like, yeah,

0:49:24.719 --> 0:49:27.040
<v Speaker 1>this is I'm not saying we need to make it fancy.

0:49:27.360 --> 0:49:30.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm just saying that needs to be genuine. I've gone

0:49:30.080 --> 0:49:31.719
<v Speaker 1>to a lot of weddings where I felt like I'm

0:49:31.719 --> 0:49:35.920
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of a production and it's everything is fake. Okay, son,

0:49:36.120 --> 0:49:40.640
<v Speaker 1>So let's not make it contractually obligated. So okay, agree, Yeah,

0:49:41.080 --> 0:49:43.200
<v Speaker 1>I think I think it's you know, but but to

0:49:43.200 --> 0:49:45.480
<v Speaker 1>answer your question, I don't think I would hope we

0:49:45.480 --> 0:49:49.280
<v Speaker 1>would never formalize it I hope so too. Yes, I agree,

0:49:49.640 --> 0:49:51.680
<v Speaker 1>I agree with that thing. Um. I I think that

0:49:51.760 --> 0:49:54.600
<v Speaker 1>in general, consenting adults should be allowed to do what

0:49:54.600 --> 0:49:56.759
<v Speaker 1>what they want to do as long as they're not

0:49:56.840 --> 0:49:59.799
<v Speaker 1>hitting anyone. And then potentially the government doesn't even have

0:50:00.040 --> 0:50:02.759
<v Speaker 1>new business being in it. Yeah. Yeah, yeah, that's a

0:50:02.760 --> 0:50:07.799
<v Speaker 1>different podcast politics. Yeah, moving on. So yeah, I think

0:50:07.840 --> 0:50:09.560
<v Speaker 1>the future of dating is essentially going to be the

0:50:09.600 --> 0:50:12.360
<v Speaker 1>same old story as we've always seen, you know, people

0:50:12.760 --> 0:50:15.960
<v Speaker 1>trying to find other people that they you know, they

0:50:16.480 --> 0:50:19.360
<v Speaker 1>are compatible with. And I'm I'm hoping that all of

0:50:19.400 --> 0:50:21.960
<v Speaker 1>this math that we are we are compiling about about

0:50:22.000 --> 0:50:24.799
<v Speaker 1>stuff and things and people's um is going to to

0:50:24.960 --> 0:50:28.319
<v Speaker 1>lead to an actual better understanding of ourselves because you know,

0:50:28.400 --> 0:50:30.920
<v Speaker 1>like like I'm not on Okay Cupid even though I

0:50:30.920 --> 0:50:34.680
<v Speaker 1>am single, because it sounds exhausting and I don't really

0:50:34.760 --> 0:50:36.799
<v Speaker 1>I don't really care what a computer has to say

0:50:36.840 --> 0:50:40.080
<v Speaker 1>about my personality. UM, I would kind of rather meet

0:50:40.120 --> 0:50:42.719
<v Speaker 1>people and figure it out for myself. And and there

0:50:42.760 --> 0:50:45.239
<v Speaker 1>are plenty of people who have that same reaction. Right,

0:50:46.000 --> 0:50:48.440
<v Speaker 1>we haven't even mentioned this yet. The thing you just

0:50:48.480 --> 0:50:52.399
<v Speaker 1>said brings up the whole aspect of fun. I mean,

0:50:52.560 --> 0:50:55.279
<v Speaker 1>like isn't it a thing people do for fun, like

0:50:55.400 --> 0:50:58.000
<v Speaker 1>dating is a fun. It's not just like I got

0:50:58.000 --> 0:51:00.879
<v Speaker 1>to get through this find somebody. I don't know, there's

0:51:00.880 --> 0:51:03.239
<v Speaker 1>there's that perspective. But you know, I've I've heard a

0:51:03.239 --> 0:51:06.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of people talk about like needing to really settle down,

0:51:06.080 --> 0:51:07.600
<v Speaker 1>and I'm like, well, don't you want to meet someone

0:51:07.640 --> 0:51:09.520
<v Speaker 1>that you want to settle down with? I mean, like,

0:51:09.600 --> 0:51:12.040
<v Speaker 1>wanting to settle down should be kind of aside the

0:51:12.080 --> 0:51:15.200
<v Speaker 1>point of meeting that person. Cuarly, the process is part

0:51:15.200 --> 0:51:17.759
<v Speaker 1>of it. And if you're taking if your your goal

0:51:17.840 --> 0:51:21.959
<v Speaker 1>is to remove the process entirely. You both are so young,

0:51:22.760 --> 0:51:26.279
<v Speaker 1>so young, you probably both think Romeo and Juliets just

0:51:26.280 --> 0:51:32.560
<v Speaker 1>a genuine love story to kidding, kidding, but no, no,

0:51:32.600 --> 0:51:36.200
<v Speaker 1>I think there are people who feel like they've reached

0:51:36.200 --> 0:51:38.800
<v Speaker 1>a point in their lives where they have that feeling

0:51:38.840 --> 0:51:40.359
<v Speaker 1>they want to settle down and they want to find

0:51:40.360 --> 0:51:42.640
<v Speaker 1>the right person too. It's not I don't think it's

0:51:42.680 --> 0:51:47.840
<v Speaker 1>an either or situation or even they have necessarily put

0:51:47.920 --> 0:51:51.360
<v Speaker 1>one ahead of the other. It's just that they feel

0:51:51.400 --> 0:51:53.719
<v Speaker 1>like this is the time of my life where this

0:51:53.760 --> 0:51:56.239
<v Speaker 1>is what I want and I want to find the

0:51:56.320 --> 0:51:58.640
<v Speaker 1>right person to have that with, which means I've got

0:51:58.680 --> 0:52:01.520
<v Speaker 1>to find someone who also it's this thing. So I

0:52:01.560 --> 0:52:04.200
<v Speaker 1>think it's that kind of mentality. It's not necessarily like

0:52:04.600 --> 0:52:08.319
<v Speaker 1>I need to find I need to find person, yeah,

0:52:08.360 --> 0:52:11.440
<v Speaker 1>to fit in this this this person shaped whole I

0:52:11.520 --> 0:52:13.799
<v Speaker 1>have in my life that I want filled, you know.

0:52:13.840 --> 0:52:16.759
<v Speaker 1>I think that that's that's the way most people think

0:52:16.800 --> 0:52:20.080
<v Speaker 1>of it. I think that, uh, the computer dating thing

0:52:20.120 --> 0:52:22.719
<v Speaker 1>can have its place. I also think that if you

0:52:22.760 --> 0:52:25.200
<v Speaker 1>are putting all of your faith in it, then you're

0:52:25.280 --> 0:52:27.839
<v Speaker 1>you're setting yourself up to fail. And that if you're

0:52:27.840 --> 0:52:30.840
<v Speaker 1>putting too much faith in it means that you're putting

0:52:30.840 --> 0:52:33.360
<v Speaker 1>so much pressure on it that the dates that you

0:52:33.480 --> 0:52:36.040
<v Speaker 1>go on, even if they go well, you may not

0:52:36.120 --> 0:52:38.480
<v Speaker 1>even recognize it at the time. And I've read a

0:52:38.480 --> 0:52:41.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of reports about dates that were set up online

0:52:41.239 --> 0:52:44.440
<v Speaker 1>that did not go well, which could certainly end up

0:52:44.840 --> 0:52:52.160
<v Speaker 1>making you feel um disenchanted with dating in general, you know. So, uh,

0:52:52.280 --> 0:52:55.319
<v Speaker 1>I think if you go into it open minded and

0:52:55.360 --> 0:52:57.759
<v Speaker 1>you don't have expectations of how it's going to come

0:52:57.760 --> 0:53:00.800
<v Speaker 1>out ahead of time, then it can be a useful

0:53:01.200 --> 0:53:04.680
<v Speaker 1>way of meeting new people and potentially someone that would

0:53:05.000 --> 0:53:08.960
<v Speaker 1>be the last first date you ever had. But you know,

0:53:09.239 --> 0:53:11.920
<v Speaker 1>it's the same can be said of all sorts of

0:53:11.920 --> 0:53:15.480
<v Speaker 1>social interactions. So I don't think of it as replacing anything.

0:53:15.520 --> 0:53:18.359
<v Speaker 1>I think it's just another way, And as long as

0:53:18.440 --> 0:53:20.520
<v Speaker 1>other people view it that way, I think that works

0:53:20.520 --> 0:53:22.799
<v Speaker 1>out pretty well. If you start to put all your

0:53:22.840 --> 0:53:25.040
<v Speaker 1>cards in one deck, then you start rank into trouble.

0:53:25.880 --> 0:53:28.600
<v Speaker 1>That wraps up our discussion about dating in the digital

0:53:28.640 --> 0:53:33.800
<v Speaker 1>age with your experts who read a lot have no

0:53:33.840 --> 0:53:36.320
<v Speaker 1>idea what they're talking about. Yeah, we'll talk about particle

0:53:36.360 --> 0:53:39.880
<v Speaker 1>physics all day long, but girls, all right. So, but

0:53:39.960 --> 0:53:42.160
<v Speaker 1>if you want to join us and joining on the

0:53:42.200 --> 0:53:44.399
<v Speaker 1>discussion and talk a little bit more about your own

0:53:44.480 --> 0:53:48.160
<v Speaker 1>dating experiences, perhaps go to fw thinking dot com. That's

0:53:48.160 --> 0:53:50.320
<v Speaker 1>where we have all the blog posts, we have the videos,

0:53:50.320 --> 0:53:52.840
<v Speaker 1>we've got the podcast, we've got articles, we have lots

0:53:52.840 --> 0:53:55.279
<v Speaker 1>of information for you to look at. We want you

0:53:55.320 --> 0:53:58.280
<v Speaker 1>to join the conversation. Also, remember we have our social

0:53:58.400 --> 0:54:01.680
<v Speaker 1>media handles out there. It's f W thinking. You can

0:54:01.719 --> 0:54:04.839
<v Speaker 1>find us on Twitter, Facebook, and Google Plus. Come join

0:54:04.920 --> 0:54:07.359
<v Speaker 1>along and we will talk to you again really soon.

0:54:11.480 --> 0:54:13.920
<v Speaker 1>For more on this topic and the future of technology,

0:54:14.239 --> 0:54:27.920
<v Speaker 1>visit forward thinking dot com. Brought to you by Toyota.

0:54:28.400 --> 0:54:29.360
<v Speaker 1>Let's go Places,