WEBVTT - What is the axion?

0:00:08.720 --> 0:00:12.560
<v Speaker 1>Hey, Daniel, if you ever discovered a particle, what would

0:00:12.600 --> 0:00:15.040
<v Speaker 1>you name it? Oh? I feel a little bit put

0:00:15.120 --> 0:00:17.439
<v Speaker 1>on the spot and no pressure. I mean, you wouldn't

0:00:17.480 --> 0:00:22.280
<v Speaker 1>just name it the white sun or the white cuno, did, DANIELO. Well,

0:00:22.320 --> 0:00:24.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, over the course of these podcasts, I've come

0:00:24.800 --> 0:00:27.480
<v Speaker 1>to get a feeling of, I don't know, judgment from

0:00:27.480 --> 0:00:30.640
<v Speaker 1>you by the quality of particle names. So I guess

0:00:30.680 --> 0:00:33.519
<v Speaker 1>I feel some responsibility to like do it right and

0:00:33.600 --> 0:00:36.280
<v Speaker 1>meet your high standards. Well, I'm glad I'm doing my

0:00:36.320 --> 0:00:39.080
<v Speaker 1>bid to make physics better. You know. I just hope

0:00:39.120 --> 0:00:40.760
<v Speaker 1>you don't give it a silly name, you know, like

0:00:40.800 --> 0:00:43.360
<v Speaker 1>a random name, like a squiggly on or something. You know,

0:00:43.520 --> 0:00:46.479
<v Speaker 1>those quiglyons. That would be a silly name. Well, I

0:00:46.520 --> 0:00:49.040
<v Speaker 1>promised to do my best. I won't like name it

0:00:49.080 --> 0:00:52.199
<v Speaker 1>after a random laundry detergent or something. All right, if

0:00:52.200 --> 0:01:10.480
<v Speaker 1>you do that, this podcast is over. Hi am Orhammad,

0:01:10.520 --> 0:01:14.200
<v Speaker 1>cartoonist and the creator of PhD comics. Hi. I'm Daniel.

0:01:14.280 --> 0:01:17.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm a particle physicist who has never discovered a particle,

0:01:17.840 --> 0:01:20.200
<v Speaker 1>at least one that nobody else has discovered. That's right.

0:01:20.520 --> 0:01:23.040
<v Speaker 1>I found particles this morning when I had breakfast and

0:01:23.080 --> 0:01:25.400
<v Speaker 1>I planned to find some more for lunch. But they're

0:01:25.440 --> 0:01:28.800
<v Speaker 1>all your everyday running the mill quirks and electron Yeah,

0:01:28.800 --> 0:01:31.160
<v Speaker 1>I find particles all the time in my belly button.

0:01:33.040 --> 0:01:35.240
<v Speaker 1>That's probably not a picture we want to paint this

0:01:35.520 --> 0:01:38.119
<v Speaker 1>really in the episode. That's probably what dark matter is. Jorge.

0:01:38.200 --> 0:01:40.720
<v Speaker 1>It's just your belly button. Oh yeah, my billy win

0:01:40.840 --> 0:01:45.320
<v Speaker 1>is full of dark matter and dark energy and physicists

0:01:45.319 --> 0:01:48.080
<v Speaker 1>also can't explain it. But welcome to our podcast, Daniel

0:01:48.120 --> 0:01:51.040
<v Speaker 1>and Jorge Explain the Universe, a production of I Heart

0:01:51.120 --> 0:01:53.960
<v Speaker 1>Radio in which we try to tackle the biggest questions

0:01:54.000 --> 0:01:56.480
<v Speaker 1>in the universe. What is dark matter, what is everything

0:01:56.520 --> 0:01:59.480
<v Speaker 1>made out of? What is that weird thing in Jorge's

0:01:59.520 --> 0:02:01.400
<v Speaker 1>belly button? And we try to do it in a

0:02:01.440 --> 0:02:04.720
<v Speaker 1>way that educates you and entertains you along the way.

0:02:04.840 --> 0:02:06.840
<v Speaker 1>And we like to talk about not just the science

0:02:06.840 --> 0:02:08.760
<v Speaker 1>and what we know about the universe and what we

0:02:08.840 --> 0:02:11.120
<v Speaker 1>don't know, but we also kind of like to talk

0:02:11.200 --> 0:02:13.840
<v Speaker 1>sometimes about the process of science, like how are things

0:02:13.880 --> 0:02:17.000
<v Speaker 1>discovered or what are scientists thinking about or what are

0:02:17.000 --> 0:02:19.840
<v Speaker 1>they looking for. That's right, because the forefront of science,

0:02:19.880 --> 0:02:23.360
<v Speaker 1>the edge of human curiosity, it belongs to everybody, and

0:02:23.400 --> 0:02:26.120
<v Speaker 1>we want you to know what are scientists thinking about,

0:02:26.200 --> 0:02:28.359
<v Speaker 1>what are they wondering about, what do they not know?

0:02:28.680 --> 0:02:30.799
<v Speaker 1>And what are they doing to figure it out? How

0:02:30.840 --> 0:02:34.400
<v Speaker 1>do we go from clueless too, slightly clued in, slightly

0:02:34.480 --> 0:02:39.919
<v Speaker 1>less clueless, diminishing cluelessness. That'll be the title of my autobiography. Yeah,

0:02:39.919 --> 0:02:41.919
<v Speaker 1>we would like to kind of stand at the precipice

0:02:42.000 --> 0:02:44.480
<v Speaker 1>of ignorance. I'd like to call it like, we're right

0:02:44.520 --> 0:02:46.799
<v Speaker 1>at the edge of what scientists know and don't know

0:02:47.320 --> 0:02:49.840
<v Speaker 1>and what they're discovering right now at the moment. Do

0:02:49.880 --> 0:02:51.640
<v Speaker 1>you think we are in danger of falling into that

0:02:51.680 --> 0:02:54.760
<v Speaker 1>precipice or we're pushing it back. I think it's possible

0:02:54.800 --> 0:02:57.079
<v Speaker 1>to go a little bit too deep into the rabid

0:02:57.120 --> 0:03:00.760
<v Speaker 1>hole here of what we don't know in physics. Just

0:03:00.840 --> 0:03:02.680
<v Speaker 1>following up on your metaphor there, does that make the

0:03:02.800 --> 0:03:07.480
<v Speaker 1>rabbit is ignorance or rabbits are ignorant? Well, I don't

0:03:07.480 --> 0:03:10.880
<v Speaker 1>want to insult any rabbits. We're definitely pro rabbit on

0:03:10.880 --> 0:03:14.320
<v Speaker 1>this podcast. Were we are we like rabbits here? But

0:03:14.440 --> 0:03:16.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, one question is that you know there are

0:03:16.400 --> 0:03:19.160
<v Speaker 1>all these particles out there in the universe and there's

0:03:19.240 --> 0:03:22.320
<v Speaker 1>a whole bunch of particles we've discovered in the universe,

0:03:22.600 --> 0:03:24.360
<v Speaker 1>and and so the kind of the question is like,

0:03:24.400 --> 0:03:27.359
<v Speaker 1>how do people find new particles? How do you physicists

0:03:27.360 --> 0:03:29.960
<v Speaker 1>discover them? Yeah, there's sort of two big ways to

0:03:30.040 --> 0:03:31.840
<v Speaker 1>do it. One is to look at the list of

0:03:31.880 --> 0:03:35.160
<v Speaker 1>particles we have now and say it doesn't seem complete.

0:03:35.360 --> 0:03:38.080
<v Speaker 1>We need another one. And this is the case when

0:03:38.120 --> 0:03:40.080
<v Speaker 1>we talked about the top cork, for example, we had

0:03:40.120 --> 0:03:43.280
<v Speaker 1>a nice little pattern of particles with a missing square

0:03:43.280 --> 0:03:45.480
<v Speaker 1>in it. There was one particle that didn't have a

0:03:45.520 --> 0:03:47.880
<v Speaker 1>partner and everything else was paired off, so we thought

0:03:48.040 --> 0:03:51.240
<v Speaker 1>there must be one there. And sometimes, more abstractly, we

0:03:51.320 --> 0:03:54.160
<v Speaker 1>say there's just a larger pattern that would make sense

0:03:54.440 --> 0:03:57.080
<v Speaker 1>if we added one more particle. That's how the Higgs

0:03:57.120 --> 0:03:59.760
<v Speaker 1>boson was discovered, for example. So you're saying particle physics,

0:03:59.760 --> 0:04:04.600
<v Speaker 1>it's it's kind of like pokemon collecting or baseball card collecting. Yeah,

0:04:04.600 --> 0:04:07.120
<v Speaker 1>except we can't trade. You know, if the aliens come,

0:04:07.160 --> 0:04:09.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe we could trade our discoveries for their for theirs. Right,

0:04:10.120 --> 0:04:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Oh my goodness, your nerve brain just exploded. I'll give

0:04:13.440 --> 0:04:15.680
<v Speaker 1>you a Higgs boson for the dark matter. Please? Do

0:04:15.680 --> 0:04:20.440
<v Speaker 1>you have dark matter? We want dark matter? Boy? That

0:04:20.440 --> 0:04:22.320
<v Speaker 1>would be uh, that does sound kind of like fun.

0:04:22.400 --> 0:04:25.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, you can get together the neighborhood and you

0:04:25.440 --> 0:04:28.120
<v Speaker 1>exchange what do you know about the universe. I'm looking

0:04:28.160 --> 0:04:30.680
<v Speaker 1>forward at that party. But there's a whole other way

0:04:30.720 --> 0:04:33.279
<v Speaker 1>to discover particles, which is just to sort of stumble

0:04:33.360 --> 0:04:36.080
<v Speaker 1>across them, to like find them in nature and see

0:04:36.080 --> 0:04:39.400
<v Speaker 1>them and go what's that and then figure out how

0:04:39.440 --> 0:04:42.200
<v Speaker 1>does it fit into the larger puzzle, where does this go?

0:04:42.360 --> 0:04:45.120
<v Speaker 1>How do we connected? And we haven't done too much

0:04:45.120 --> 0:04:48.200
<v Speaker 1>of that recently. Mostly we've been predicting particles and then

0:04:48.279 --> 0:04:50.560
<v Speaker 1>find I see. So how would you stumble upon a

0:04:50.600 --> 0:04:53.520
<v Speaker 1>particle like you're running the collider or any kind of

0:04:53.520 --> 0:04:56.960
<v Speaker 1>collider and then suddenly you see something you weren't expecting. Yeah, precisely.

0:04:57.080 --> 0:04:59.760
<v Speaker 1>This is how mu ones were discovered. For example, they

0:04:59.760 --> 0:05:03.239
<v Speaker 1>had big blocks of photographic materials up on the tops

0:05:03.240 --> 0:05:05.520
<v Speaker 1>of mountains and they saw these streaks of particles going

0:05:05.560 --> 0:05:08.560
<v Speaker 1>through them, and the particles weren't consistent with electrons or

0:05:08.600 --> 0:05:10.640
<v Speaker 1>anything else, and so they said, well, this must be

0:05:10.680 --> 0:05:14.040
<v Speaker 1>some new particle we haven't seen before. And colliders are

0:05:14.040 --> 0:05:18.040
<v Speaker 1>actually the best place to discover a new, unexpected particle

0:05:18.120 --> 0:05:20.719
<v Speaker 1>because you smash the protons together and you get this

0:05:20.760 --> 0:05:24.640
<v Speaker 1>little blob of energy which can turn into anything. Anything

0:05:24.720 --> 0:05:27.520
<v Speaker 1>the universe is capable of making, and so you could

0:05:27.520 --> 0:05:30.600
<v Speaker 1>just pop out some crazy new particle you've never seen

0:05:30.640 --> 0:05:33.520
<v Speaker 1>before without you knowing that it exists. You don't have

0:05:33.600 --> 0:05:36.080
<v Speaker 1>to know it's there in order to find it. That's

0:05:36.080 --> 0:05:39.160
<v Speaker 1>the amazing thing about exploring the universe with colliders. You'd

0:05:39.160 --> 0:05:42.839
<v Speaker 1>be like, who ordered that exactly where that? That's exactly

0:05:42.920 --> 0:05:45.520
<v Speaker 1>literally what they said when they heard about the mule,

0:05:45.560 --> 0:05:47.839
<v Speaker 1>and they said, what, we don't need that. That doesn't

0:05:47.839 --> 0:05:51.320
<v Speaker 1>make any sense. Go take that somewhere else. Well, we've

0:05:51.320 --> 0:05:54.280
<v Speaker 1>had several episodes where we talk about the discovery and

0:05:54.360 --> 0:05:56.599
<v Speaker 1>the search for different particles. We had one about the

0:05:56.600 --> 0:06:00.240
<v Speaker 1>top cork and the electron and all these other particles.

0:06:00.279 --> 0:06:03.080
<v Speaker 1>And so today we'll tell the story of another particle,

0:06:03.160 --> 0:06:06.800
<v Speaker 1>one that was proposed almost forty years ago and that

0:06:06.880 --> 0:06:09.520
<v Speaker 1>we are still looking for. That's right, this is a

0:06:09.560 --> 0:06:13.200
<v Speaker 1>particle which may or may not exist, and if it

0:06:13.240 --> 0:06:17.320
<v Speaker 1>does exist, it may simultaneously solve two of the biggest

0:06:17.400 --> 0:06:21.920
<v Speaker 1>problems in particle physics and weirdly, it's a particle almost

0:06:22.080 --> 0:06:25.360
<v Speaker 1>nobody outside the field has even heard of. Wow, well,

0:06:25.400 --> 0:06:27.720
<v Speaker 1>I guess we we don't know if it exists, and

0:06:27.800 --> 0:06:29.760
<v Speaker 1>so if it doesn't exist, we have to erase this

0:06:29.800 --> 0:06:34.240
<v Speaker 1>podcast episode. Daniel or no, we get paid Either way,

0:06:34.240 --> 0:06:39.040
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't really matter. Okay, forget about that. Well apparently

0:06:39.040 --> 0:06:42.080
<v Speaker 1>has the one of the citiest names in the history

0:06:42.080 --> 0:06:45.000
<v Speaker 1>of particles. Yes, I'm looking forward to hearing your reaction

0:06:45.200 --> 0:06:47.640
<v Speaker 1>to how this particle was named. It ends up with

0:06:47.720 --> 0:06:50.680
<v Speaker 1>a really pretty cool name. But the reason for that

0:06:50.760 --> 0:06:54.440
<v Speaker 1>name is really pretty ludicrous and whimsical. Oh man, I

0:06:54.440 --> 0:06:58.000
<v Speaker 1>am not looking forward to that. But anyway, So today

0:06:58.000 --> 0:07:04.680
<v Speaker 1>on the podcast, we'll be asking the question, what is

0:07:04.720 --> 0:07:08.520
<v Speaker 1>the most important particle you've never heard of? It's just

0:07:08.600 --> 0:07:11.440
<v Speaker 1>like a trendy band that everyone should listen to but

0:07:11.480 --> 0:07:13.960
<v Speaker 1>nobody knows about. Yeah, this is the particle your teenager

0:07:14.040 --> 0:07:16.760
<v Speaker 1>knows about, but you are clueless about it. It's super

0:07:16.760 --> 0:07:21.560
<v Speaker 1>hot on TikTok You're like, what what is TikTok? That's

0:07:21.560 --> 0:07:24.080
<v Speaker 1>precisely you don't even know the name of the social

0:07:24.120 --> 0:07:27.280
<v Speaker 1>media app on which this particle is cool. That's how

0:07:27.360 --> 0:07:29.480
<v Speaker 1>uncool you are. No, but it is. It is a

0:07:29.560 --> 0:07:32.440
<v Speaker 1>really cool name. I like. I like the sound of

0:07:32.480 --> 0:07:35.120
<v Speaker 1>the name of this particle. It's this particle is called

0:07:35.160 --> 0:07:38.960
<v Speaker 1>the axion. That does sound pretty cool. It does sound

0:07:38.960 --> 0:07:41.160
<v Speaker 1>pretty cool. What doesn't invoke in your mind or him

0:07:41.560 --> 0:07:45.240
<v Speaker 1>like a robot or you know, like um like access

0:07:45.360 --> 0:07:49.280
<v Speaker 1>maybe Unfortunately, the word for armpits in Spanish is kind

0:07:49.280 --> 0:07:51.320
<v Speaker 1>of close to it, So it is making me think

0:07:51.320 --> 0:07:54.000
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of art pits. But we won't go

0:07:54.080 --> 0:08:00.240
<v Speaker 1>there is an unfortunate name. It makes me think of

0:08:00.280 --> 0:08:03.840
<v Speaker 1>sort of like double edged axes being thrown in space

0:08:03.880 --> 0:08:06.760
<v Speaker 1>along three different axes, you know, like X and y

0:08:06.800 --> 0:08:09.880
<v Speaker 1>ax and your y ax and your zo throwing an

0:08:10.080 --> 0:08:13.480
<v Speaker 1>X and X around. I don't know, I don't know,

0:08:13.840 --> 0:08:15.560
<v Speaker 1>but it is a cool name. It's fun to say.

0:08:15.600 --> 0:08:18.800
<v Speaker 1>It's got that same sound in their idea. I think

0:08:19.080 --> 0:08:21.440
<v Speaker 1>as long as it sounds like a transformer, it sounds

0:08:21.720 --> 0:08:27.480
<v Speaker 1>I think cool. In physics, you know, synchrotron, graviton megatron

0:08:27.600 --> 0:08:29.840
<v Speaker 1>is not a particle, though the awesome there you go,

0:08:30.320 --> 0:08:32.160
<v Speaker 1>that will be the name of a particle. Some of

0:08:32.200 --> 0:08:35.280
<v Speaker 1>you may have heard about the new interesting axon result

0:08:35.360 --> 0:08:38.760
<v Speaker 1>from the Zenon experiment. Now today we'll be talking about

0:08:38.760 --> 0:08:41.720
<v Speaker 1>the axon more generally, but we're going to dig into

0:08:41.760 --> 0:08:46.160
<v Speaker 1>the zenon solar axon question in a dedicated episode coming

0:08:46.280 --> 0:08:49.560
<v Speaker 1>very soon. But as usual, I was curious, what did

0:08:49.600 --> 0:08:52.600
<v Speaker 1>people know about the axon? Is this something people actually

0:08:52.600 --> 0:08:55.240
<v Speaker 1>have heard of or is this something that only the

0:08:55.240 --> 0:08:58.319
<v Speaker 1>cool kids on physics TikTok know about? And so is

0:08:58.480 --> 0:09:00.760
<v Speaker 1>Daniel went out there into the files of the Internet

0:09:00.800 --> 0:09:04.520
<v Speaker 1>to ask people what they know about the axion particle.

0:09:04.679 --> 0:09:07.720
<v Speaker 1>So thank you to everybody who volunteered to answer random

0:09:07.840 --> 0:09:12.240
<v Speaker 1>Internet questions and sending in your responses. If you'd like

0:09:12.280 --> 0:09:16.400
<v Speaker 1>to participate in random person on the street internet questions,

0:09:16.600 --> 0:09:19.360
<v Speaker 1>then please write to us at questions at Daniel and

0:09:19.440 --> 0:09:22.440
<v Speaker 1>Jorge dot com. Before you hear these answers, think about

0:09:22.480 --> 0:09:24.520
<v Speaker 1>it for a second and someone as you if you

0:09:24.600 --> 0:09:28.719
<v Speaker 1>knew what the axion particle was, what would you say.

0:09:29.000 --> 0:09:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Here's what people had to say. I think this is

0:09:31.440 --> 0:09:36.360
<v Speaker 1>a way to classify particles. They like they can be axion,

0:09:36.559 --> 0:09:41.680
<v Speaker 1>some boat songs and it has to do with them,

0:09:41.840 --> 0:09:45.079
<v Speaker 1>for example, having mass or not. I don't know. I

0:09:45.760 --> 0:09:50.880
<v Speaker 1>guess action access would perhaps be some sort of particle

0:09:50.960 --> 0:09:54.560
<v Speaker 1>that other particles turn around. I have no idea but

0:09:54.640 --> 0:09:56.520
<v Speaker 1>since it sounds like the word axel, I'm going to

0:09:56.600 --> 0:09:59.240
<v Speaker 1>guess it has something to do with joining other particles together.

0:09:59.520 --> 0:10:03.000
<v Speaker 1>I have no idea. I don't know. I think that's

0:10:03.040 --> 0:10:07.240
<v Speaker 1>to do with what doll matter is might of I

0:10:07.360 --> 0:10:12.960
<v Speaker 1>believe there are two options, are actions or whimps. Honestly,

0:10:12.960 --> 0:10:14.840
<v Speaker 1>I have no idea. Because it has the word ion

0:10:14.840 --> 0:10:16.800
<v Speaker 1>in it, maybe it's some kind of ion. It's got

0:10:17.240 --> 0:10:22.320
<v Speaker 1>no idea. I never heard about something called axiom. Yeah,

0:10:22.360 --> 0:10:25.840
<v Speaker 1>of course that's an elementary particle of an action figure

0:10:26.000 --> 0:10:30.760
<v Speaker 1>the Caveman scientists in your book discussing what the most

0:10:30.800 --> 0:10:34.920
<v Speaker 1>fundamental particle of a stone ax would be. I assume

0:10:36.000 --> 0:10:42.560
<v Speaker 1>it's not a standard particle. Maybe it's more like strange matter.

0:10:43.040 --> 0:10:47.040
<v Speaker 1>All right, not a lot of positive recognition there. I

0:10:47.080 --> 0:10:49.240
<v Speaker 1>like the one that said it's it's an action figure,

0:10:49.360 --> 0:10:51.960
<v Speaker 1>or it's related to an action figure, the fundamental element

0:10:52.000 --> 0:10:55.040
<v Speaker 1>of an action figure. That makes a lot of sense. Well,

0:10:55.040 --> 0:10:57.080
<v Speaker 1>if it does exist and it is part of nature,

0:10:57.120 --> 0:11:00.640
<v Speaker 1>it could be part of all action figures. It could be.

0:11:00.880 --> 0:11:03.040
<v Speaker 1>And the other great idea was the that maybe it's

0:11:03.040 --> 0:11:06.160
<v Speaker 1>related to axles, so maybe like joins particles together at

0:11:06.200 --> 0:11:08.920
<v Speaker 1>this some really creative responses here, I'm impressed, or maybe

0:11:08.960 --> 0:11:11.240
<v Speaker 1>they were thinking like Axel Rose and like oh, I'm

0:11:11.240 --> 0:11:14.439
<v Speaker 1>a gone some Roses fan, in which case the Axon's

0:11:14.480 --> 0:11:17.439
<v Speaker 1>career has to also be in the dusk. Yeah, they

0:11:17.480 --> 0:11:20.840
<v Speaker 1>better get on that physics TikTok right away. Some silly dances.

0:11:20.880 --> 0:11:22.679
<v Speaker 1>But it did seem like none of these folks had

0:11:22.720 --> 0:11:25.240
<v Speaker 1>heard of this particle or really had any clue about

0:11:25.240 --> 0:11:28.960
<v Speaker 1>its incredibly important role in particle physics. Man, well, I

0:11:28.960 --> 0:11:32.400
<v Speaker 1>would count myself among those numbers. I had no idea

0:11:32.480 --> 0:11:34.840
<v Speaker 1>what this and have no idea of what this particle

0:11:35.480 --> 0:11:38.319
<v Speaker 1>is before he sent me the outline for today's episode.

0:11:38.360 --> 0:11:40.960
<v Speaker 1>But let's get into it, Daniel, what is the axion?

0:11:41.040 --> 0:11:45.200
<v Speaker 1>It sounds kind of important but maybe not yet discovered. Yeah,

0:11:45.240 --> 0:11:48.800
<v Speaker 1>the axion particle is totally theoretical, so we do not

0:11:49.000 --> 0:11:51.640
<v Speaker 1>know if it's part of our universe at all. It

0:11:51.720 --> 0:11:54.679
<v Speaker 1>may just be an idea in people's minds. And remember

0:11:54.920 --> 0:11:58.160
<v Speaker 1>there's been a lot more ideas than actual particles. And

0:11:58.240 --> 0:12:01.640
<v Speaker 1>sometimes these ideas are beautiful, they make perfect sense, and

0:12:01.679 --> 0:12:04.280
<v Speaker 1>when the physicist has them, they go, Wow, everything is

0:12:04.320 --> 0:12:07.400
<v Speaker 1>connected and this is the way the universe works. But

0:12:07.440 --> 0:12:09.600
<v Speaker 1>then you go and you ask the universe like is

0:12:09.600 --> 0:12:12.880
<v Speaker 1>it real? And Uver says, nice idea, but no, isn't

0:12:12.880 --> 0:12:14.960
<v Speaker 1>that kind of strange? I feel like that's almost like

0:12:14.960 --> 0:12:18.160
<v Speaker 1>trying to discover new animals by thinking of them before

0:12:18.200 --> 0:12:21.720
<v Speaker 1>you actually find. It's like, oh, what if there's an

0:12:21.760 --> 0:12:24.760
<v Speaker 1>animal with a duck bill, but then at a dinosaur

0:12:24.880 --> 0:12:27.480
<v Speaker 1>nag and then butterfly wings, and then you go out

0:12:27.520 --> 0:12:30.040
<v Speaker 1>looking for them. Wouldn't that be kind of not productive? Yeah? Well,

0:12:30.040 --> 0:12:32.280
<v Speaker 1>but to stretch the you know, mixed metaphor of our

0:12:32.360 --> 0:12:35.360
<v Speaker 1>rabbit holes here, it's more like that you see evidence

0:12:35.400 --> 0:12:38.440
<v Speaker 1>for this animal. It's like what's eating all the deer?

0:12:38.880 --> 0:12:41.120
<v Speaker 1>And you know, I see all these strange footprints, and

0:12:41.360 --> 0:12:43.800
<v Speaker 1>maybe that would be explained if there was this new

0:12:43.880 --> 0:12:46.760
<v Speaker 1>predator out there I've never seen before. And so you're

0:12:46.760 --> 0:12:49.520
<v Speaker 1>trying to like tie up loose ends and complete the

0:12:49.559 --> 0:12:53.320
<v Speaker 1>picture by suggesting an explanation. And that's exactly what the

0:12:53.360 --> 0:12:56.760
<v Speaker 1>axion and a lot of other theoretically motivated particles do,

0:12:56.880 --> 0:12:58.840
<v Speaker 1>is they sort of trying to tie together what we

0:12:58.920 --> 0:13:01.760
<v Speaker 1>see in a small all are more compact explanation. It's

0:13:01.800 --> 0:13:04.280
<v Speaker 1>just been a pretty horrible picture of this animal. Daniel

0:13:04.760 --> 0:13:08.000
<v Speaker 1>because around eating deer. Oh my goodness, it's like a

0:13:08.040 --> 0:13:12.840
<v Speaker 1>wolf man. You're trying to go for a cool animal wolf,

0:13:12.960 --> 0:13:15.400
<v Speaker 1>the duck bill and butterfly wings. It does sound pretty cool.

0:13:15.400 --> 0:13:16.840
<v Speaker 1>That does sound pretty cool. I want to see that

0:13:16.880 --> 0:13:19.079
<v Speaker 1>animal if it exists, and you can name it. We

0:13:21.080 --> 0:13:23.360
<v Speaker 1>already use that name for something else. That would be

0:13:23.440 --> 0:13:27.840
<v Speaker 1>so confusing. But what if you find animal first, right, Like,

0:13:27.880 --> 0:13:29.840
<v Speaker 1>what if you find animal and call it the axion

0:13:30.000 --> 0:13:32.560
<v Speaker 1>before you discover this particle. I think we've already used

0:13:32.600 --> 0:13:34.760
<v Speaker 1>up the name though. That's sort of like, you know

0:13:34.800 --> 0:13:38.959
<v Speaker 1>how the Space Force television show on Netflix has trademarked

0:13:38.960 --> 0:13:42.080
<v Speaker 1>the term Space Force before the actual US Space Force

0:13:42.120 --> 0:13:47.880
<v Speaker 1>got around doing it. Oh that's a problem. That's a problem, yeah, exactly. Anyway,

0:13:47.920 --> 0:13:51.360
<v Speaker 1>back to particle physics, the axion, if it exists, is

0:13:51.400 --> 0:13:55.679
<v Speaker 1>a lot like a photon, but it doesn't have zero mass.

0:13:55.760 --> 0:14:01.440
<v Speaker 1>It has a super tiny, little whispy mask really massive photon. Yeah,

0:14:01.480 --> 0:14:03.640
<v Speaker 1>but it's not very massive. Like the mass if it

0:14:03.720 --> 0:14:07.840
<v Speaker 1>has some is like two hundred billion of the mass

0:14:07.840 --> 0:14:11.480
<v Speaker 1>of the electron, which is already one of the lightest particles.

0:14:12.679 --> 0:14:16.640
<v Speaker 1>So it's like a light light particle. It's like light light. Exactly.

0:14:16.880 --> 0:14:19.640
<v Speaker 1>It's very light light light, but not quite light, not

0:14:19.720 --> 0:14:23.880
<v Speaker 1>quite light. It's not coke zero. It's like coke light, Yeah, exactly,

0:14:23.960 --> 0:14:25.520
<v Speaker 1>it's that coke with a tiny little bit of real

0:14:25.560 --> 0:14:28.240
<v Speaker 1>sugar in it, right, Um, And why did somebody come

0:14:28.320 --> 0:14:29.720
<v Speaker 1>up with this, Well, they came up with it to

0:14:29.840 --> 0:14:33.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of answer the biggest problem in physics that nobody

0:14:33.040 --> 0:14:35.800
<v Speaker 1>ever heard of, which is, we're looking at the way

0:14:35.840 --> 0:14:39.440
<v Speaker 1>that interactions happen in physics, and we noticed something weird,

0:14:39.480 --> 0:14:41.760
<v Speaker 1>something that we cannot explain. And so it's sort of

0:14:41.960 --> 0:14:45.040
<v Speaker 1>thought up to explain this other mystery the same way

0:14:45.120 --> 0:14:48.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, you might hypothesize wolves if you see your

0:14:48.080 --> 0:14:51.240
<v Speaker 1>dear missing. This is sort of like hypothesizing the axon

0:14:51.320 --> 0:14:54.240
<v Speaker 1>to explain this other problem, which is called the strong

0:14:54.360 --> 0:14:57.880
<v Speaker 1>CP problem. Interesting, and now is its official title, the

0:14:57.920 --> 0:15:00.920
<v Speaker 1>biggest problem with notity has ever heard of? Like, do

0:15:00.960 --> 0:15:03.240
<v Speaker 1>you guys talk about it that way? Yeah, it's sort

0:15:03.240 --> 0:15:05.880
<v Speaker 1>of a famous problem that nobody really has any answer

0:15:05.920 --> 0:15:09.560
<v Speaker 1>to except the axio. And so that's why people think

0:15:09.560 --> 0:15:12.240
<v Speaker 1>the axon might really be real. And then we'll talk

0:15:12.320 --> 0:15:15.040
<v Speaker 1>later in the program about how it could also simultaneously

0:15:15.120 --> 0:15:18.960
<v Speaker 1>solve another huge problem, which makes the axon sort of

0:15:18.960 --> 0:15:22.160
<v Speaker 1>a sexy particle right now. But it was originally dreamt

0:15:22.240 --> 0:15:25.479
<v Speaker 1>up to solve this other problem called the strong CP problem.

0:15:25.520 --> 0:15:28.240
<v Speaker 1>So what what's the strong CP problem? So this problem

0:15:28.320 --> 0:15:31.120
<v Speaker 1>has to do with basically, why does the strong force

0:15:31.480 --> 0:15:34.560
<v Speaker 1>not break some symmetries and particle physics, we have all

0:15:34.600 --> 0:15:39.400
<v Speaker 1>these symmetries like charge symmetry and parity symmetry and time symmetry.

0:15:39.640 --> 0:15:43.360
<v Speaker 1>These symmetries tell us whether something works the same when

0:15:43.400 --> 0:15:46.360
<v Speaker 1>you flip it the other way. Like, if we say

0:15:46.440 --> 0:15:48.880
<v Speaker 1>something could happen to an electron, we ask, well, can

0:15:48.920 --> 0:15:51.640
<v Speaker 1>the same thing happen to a positron, which is the

0:15:51.680 --> 0:15:55.640
<v Speaker 1>opposite charge version of it. Because we like symmetries in

0:15:55.680 --> 0:15:57.920
<v Speaker 1>particle physics, we like the smallest set of rules, so

0:15:57.920 --> 0:16:00.000
<v Speaker 1>we don't want a different set of rules for electron

0:16:00.040 --> 0:16:02.800
<v Speaker 1>ones and for positrons for example. So it's kind of like,

0:16:02.840 --> 0:16:05.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, like if two negative electrons propel each other,

0:16:06.120 --> 0:16:09.640
<v Speaker 1>you can ask, like to positive electrons propel each other too,

0:16:09.720 --> 0:16:11.840
<v Speaker 1>and if they do, then that means it's like symmetric.

0:16:11.960 --> 0:16:14.280
<v Speaker 1>That's right, it's symmetric in charge. If you flip the

0:16:14.360 --> 0:16:16.120
<v Speaker 1>charge and you get the same thing, and then it's

0:16:16.120 --> 0:16:18.680
<v Speaker 1>symmetric in charge, and so we call that C for

0:16:19.160 --> 0:16:22.640
<v Speaker 1>charge symmetry, and we ask that question about everything, and

0:16:22.760 --> 0:16:28.040
<v Speaker 1>electromagnetism is charge symmetric. Everything that happens in electromagnetism would

0:16:28.040 --> 0:16:30.520
<v Speaker 1>happen the same way if you flipped all of the charges,

0:16:30.600 --> 0:16:33.760
<v Speaker 1>not just one, but all of the charges, okay. And

0:16:33.800 --> 0:16:37.400
<v Speaker 1>then the second one is called P for parity violation,

0:16:37.520 --> 0:16:39.600
<v Speaker 1>and that says, would the same thing happen if you

0:16:39.680 --> 0:16:42.400
<v Speaker 1>did it in the mirror. So, if you like set

0:16:42.440 --> 0:16:46.320
<v Speaker 1>up some particle experiment or particle decays to two other ones,

0:16:46.400 --> 0:16:49.480
<v Speaker 1>or two particles collide into each other or whatever, and

0:16:49.520 --> 0:16:52.040
<v Speaker 1>then you put that experiment in front of a mirror,

0:16:52.280 --> 0:16:54.360
<v Speaker 1>the thing that happens in the mirror is not exactly

0:16:54.400 --> 0:16:56.600
<v Speaker 1>the same as the thing that's happening in real life.

0:16:56.680 --> 0:16:59.960
<v Speaker 1>It's flipped in one dimension. Yeah, a mirror will flip

0:17:00.160 --> 0:17:03.560
<v Speaker 1>like the Z axis, for example, the axis perpendicular to

0:17:03.600 --> 0:17:06.160
<v Speaker 1>the mirror, but not the other two. So, for example,

0:17:06.200 --> 0:17:08.720
<v Speaker 1>if you hold up your left hand in front of

0:17:08.720 --> 0:17:10.760
<v Speaker 1>a mirror, then it looks like your right hand doesn't

0:17:10.760 --> 0:17:14.440
<v Speaker 1>look like your left hand, and so your hand has parody.

0:17:14.480 --> 0:17:17.639
<v Speaker 1>It's not parody symmetric, right, because it doesn't look the

0:17:17.680 --> 0:17:20.160
<v Speaker 1>same in the mirror. Doesn't look the same, but like

0:17:19.720 --> 0:17:21.879
<v Speaker 1>a like a ball does sort of look like a

0:17:21.920 --> 0:17:25.600
<v Speaker 1>perfectly round ball with no drawings or features on it

0:17:25.640 --> 0:17:28.119
<v Speaker 1>does is parody symmetric because it looks the same in

0:17:28.160 --> 0:17:30.840
<v Speaker 1>the mirror exactly. So for a long time, this is

0:17:30.840 --> 0:17:34.200
<v Speaker 1>this thought that all of particle physics was charged symmetric

0:17:34.680 --> 0:17:37.800
<v Speaker 1>and parody symmetric because it just sort of made sense, right,

0:17:38.080 --> 0:17:40.000
<v Speaker 1>and this is like to do that. They say, the

0:17:40.160 --> 0:17:43.080
<v Speaker 1>universe is beautiful and natural, and so it should follow

0:17:43.119 --> 0:17:45.600
<v Speaker 1>this rule, Like it'd be weird if the electron looked

0:17:45.640 --> 0:17:47.680
<v Speaker 1>like my right hand in front of the mirror, or

0:17:47.720 --> 0:17:49.960
<v Speaker 1>if you had electrons for hands, that would also be weird,

0:17:50.240 --> 0:17:52.960
<v Speaker 1>but for different reasons. And for a long time, everybody

0:17:52.960 --> 0:17:55.959
<v Speaker 1>assumed that everything followed all these rules. And then in

0:17:56.000 --> 0:17:59.359
<v Speaker 1>the fifties people realized, oh, nobody had ever actually checked this.

0:17:59.640 --> 0:18:02.080
<v Speaker 1>For the weak force, we had a whole episode we

0:18:02.160 --> 0:18:06.160
<v Speaker 1>dug into how the weak force actually violates parity. Interesting, Yeah,

0:18:06.200 --> 0:18:08.160
<v Speaker 1>if you have a reaction in the mirror, it looks

0:18:08.359 --> 0:18:12.080
<v Speaker 1>different than the reaction you're having like in your actual laboratory.

0:18:12.119 --> 0:18:14.880
<v Speaker 1>And when we're talking about these These are particles, right,

0:18:14.920 --> 0:18:17.800
<v Speaker 1>so they don't have features like hands, but they'll do

0:18:17.920 --> 0:18:20.560
<v Speaker 1>things like they'll turn a certain way in a magnetic field,

0:18:20.680 --> 0:18:23.000
<v Speaker 1>or they'll they'll react a certain way when they hit

0:18:23.080 --> 0:18:25.760
<v Speaker 1>something else. Right. Yeah, the experiment that discovers the violation

0:18:25.800 --> 0:18:28.000
<v Speaker 1>of parody did just that. It like takes a bunch

0:18:28.000 --> 0:18:31.360
<v Speaker 1>of nuclei, aligns them in a magnetic field, and then

0:18:31.440 --> 0:18:34.480
<v Speaker 1>watches the direction that they emit electrons. Is it like

0:18:34.520 --> 0:18:37.280
<v Speaker 1>in the same direction as the magnetic field or backwards?

0:18:37.920 --> 0:18:40.760
<v Speaker 1>And that's a fascinating experiment that if you're interested in

0:18:40.800 --> 0:18:43.320
<v Speaker 1>you should dig into that whole podcast episode. But for

0:18:43.359 --> 0:18:45.760
<v Speaker 1>a whild people thought, okay, parody is violated by the

0:18:45.800 --> 0:18:50.280
<v Speaker 1>weak force. What about the combination of charge and parody?

0:18:50.359 --> 0:18:53.479
<v Speaker 1>So put it in the mirror and flip the charge,

0:18:53.560 --> 0:18:56.359
<v Speaker 1>so that says, will an electron look the same if

0:18:56.400 --> 0:18:58.200
<v Speaker 1>you put it in the mirror and turn it into

0:18:58.240 --> 0:19:02.399
<v Speaker 1>a positron? And then we discovered that that the weak

0:19:02.440 --> 0:19:06.000
<v Speaker 1>force actually violates this also, so we call this c P.

0:19:06.800 --> 0:19:10.040
<v Speaker 1>If an interaction or a particle physics thing that happens

0:19:10.480 --> 0:19:13.000
<v Speaker 1>violates CP, it means that it doesn't look the same

0:19:13.160 --> 0:19:15.479
<v Speaker 1>when you flip the charge and put it in the mirror.

0:19:15.520 --> 0:19:20.280
<v Speaker 1>So and so the weak force violates parody, and it

0:19:20.320 --> 0:19:24.439
<v Speaker 1>also violates charge and parody. That's right now violates parody

0:19:24.440 --> 0:19:27.520
<v Speaker 1>big time. It's like a really big violation. And that

0:19:27.600 --> 0:19:30.320
<v Speaker 1>was a Nobel prize. And then people thought, well, it

0:19:30.400 --> 0:19:33.760
<v Speaker 1>must then preserve CP. It must be that parody is violated,

0:19:33.800 --> 0:19:36.440
<v Speaker 1>but the combination of these two things is still preserved.

0:19:36.640 --> 0:19:39.760
<v Speaker 1>And then they discovered that they violates CP, and that

0:19:39.880 --> 0:19:43.280
<v Speaker 1>was another Nobel prize. So that's the weak force. A

0:19:43.320 --> 0:19:46.280
<v Speaker 1>weak force violates CP, and that was sort of surprising.

0:19:46.280 --> 0:19:49.120
<v Speaker 1>But then people realized, well why not, I mean, why

0:19:49.160 --> 0:19:52.560
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't these things violate CP. They looked at the way

0:19:52.600 --> 0:19:54.439
<v Speaker 1>that we write down these interactions and the way we

0:19:54.560 --> 0:19:57.119
<v Speaker 1>understand these theories, and we say, well, it's actually totally

0:19:57.200 --> 0:20:00.000
<v Speaker 1>natural for them to violate CP. So like the theorist

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:03.760
<v Speaker 1>went from that's impossible, that's absurd, to actually make a

0:20:03.800 --> 0:20:06.359
<v Speaker 1>perfect sense. All right, Well, it sounds like there's a

0:20:06.400 --> 0:20:08.640
<v Speaker 1>lot going on with the weak force here. It violates

0:20:08.640 --> 0:20:11.119
<v Speaker 1>all kinds of symmetries, and so let's talk about some

0:20:11.160 --> 0:20:13.720
<v Speaker 1>of the other forces and how that could maybe lead

0:20:13.760 --> 0:20:16.320
<v Speaker 1>people to come up with a brand new particle called

0:20:16.359 --> 0:20:32.800
<v Speaker 1>the axion. But first let's take a quick break. All right, Diane,

0:20:32.880 --> 0:20:36.840
<v Speaker 1>we're we're talking about a potentially existing particle with a

0:20:36.840 --> 0:20:39.560
<v Speaker 1>cool name called the axion, and you're telling me that

0:20:39.600 --> 0:20:43.080
<v Speaker 1>it's definitely related to this idea of the CP problem,

0:20:43.080 --> 0:20:46.240
<v Speaker 1>which is like a problem in theoretical physics about the

0:20:46.320 --> 0:20:50.359
<v Speaker 1>symmetry of particles and whether or not they act the

0:20:50.400 --> 0:20:53.240
<v Speaker 1>same way in all kinds of situations. And so we

0:20:53.359 --> 0:20:57.679
<v Speaker 1>talked about how the weak force doesn't follows parody or

0:20:57.760 --> 0:21:01.480
<v Speaker 1>charged parody symmetry, and so and and that's now become

0:21:01.480 --> 0:21:03.880
<v Speaker 1>the normal. Before we gave them people a norval price.

0:21:03.920 --> 0:21:06.080
<v Speaker 1>We're figuring that out. But now it's like, okay, that's

0:21:06.119 --> 0:21:09.120
<v Speaker 1>the way, that's right. We realize that it's actually not

0:21:09.280 --> 0:21:12.719
<v Speaker 1>outrageous for the weak force to violate CP. And then

0:21:12.720 --> 0:21:14.720
<v Speaker 1>we looked at the other forces. We said, you know,

0:21:14.840 --> 0:21:18.359
<v Speaker 1>the same thing that allows the weak force to violate CP,

0:21:18.960 --> 0:21:21.720
<v Speaker 1>why doesn't it also allow the strong force to do it? Like,

0:21:21.760 --> 0:21:25.600
<v Speaker 1>the strong force could also violate CP, No big deal,

0:21:25.760 --> 0:21:28.520
<v Speaker 1>as the sort of same freedom inside it. It also

0:21:28.600 --> 0:21:31.160
<v Speaker 1>interacts with corks, which is what the weak force does

0:21:31.160 --> 0:21:33.720
<v Speaker 1>when it violates parody, and so people thought, oh, well,

0:21:33.760 --> 0:21:37.560
<v Speaker 1>the strong force, maybe that also violates CP. But but

0:21:37.640 --> 0:21:41.520
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't. But it doesn't. And we've made really really

0:21:41.600 --> 0:21:45.760
<v Speaker 1>precise measurements of this, like crazy precise measurements, and so

0:21:45.840 --> 0:21:52.439
<v Speaker 1>the strong force observes CP sort of for no good reasons. Interesting, so, like,

0:21:52.480 --> 0:21:56.359
<v Speaker 1>if you try the strong force, it seems to be symmetric.

0:21:56.600 --> 0:21:58.800
<v Speaker 1>It follows the rules. It's like, it follows the rules.

0:21:59.119 --> 0:22:02.080
<v Speaker 1>It's the good citizen of physics. Yeah, it's like if

0:22:02.080 --> 0:22:04.200
<v Speaker 1>you were watching people drive down the highway and every

0:22:04.200 --> 0:22:07.040
<v Speaker 1>single one of them was driving exactly at the speed limit,

0:22:07.160 --> 0:22:10.240
<v Speaker 1>no higher, no lower, to like one billions of a

0:22:10.280 --> 0:22:12.720
<v Speaker 1>mile per hour, you'd be like, that's weird. That would

0:22:12.720 --> 0:22:16.520
<v Speaker 1>be suspicious precisely, and you'd wonder, like, oh, maybe there's

0:22:16.520 --> 0:22:19.320
<v Speaker 1>a speed trap out there or something like that. Ord

0:22:19.359 --> 0:22:22.320
<v Speaker 1>their engines are fixed or something. You look for a reason, right,

0:22:22.720 --> 0:22:26.240
<v Speaker 1>or they're all using cruise control. Yeah, precisely, and it's

0:22:26.280 --> 0:22:29.360
<v Speaker 1>automated by the government or something. And so that's what

0:22:29.560 --> 0:22:32.040
<v Speaker 1>makes us wonder. We see this parameter in the strong

0:22:32.080 --> 0:22:34.960
<v Speaker 1>force that would very naturally allow for the strong force

0:22:35.040 --> 0:22:38.160
<v Speaker 1>to violate CP, but it doesn't. It's like this angle

0:22:38.440 --> 0:22:41.199
<v Speaker 1>that would allow it is set to exactly zero, and

0:22:41.240 --> 0:22:43.920
<v Speaker 1>that seems weird. It seems like it needs an explanation.

0:22:44.119 --> 0:22:47.680
<v Speaker 1>And that's the strong CP problem is why doesn't the

0:22:47.720 --> 0:22:51.439
<v Speaker 1>strong force violate CP. It's called I just got it, Daniel.

0:22:51.520 --> 0:22:53.840
<v Speaker 1>It's called the strong CP problem because it applies to

0:22:53.880 --> 0:22:59.400
<v Speaker 1>the strong force, that's right, not because it's a strong problem. Well,

0:22:59.440 --> 0:23:01.280
<v Speaker 1>you know something, problems are called like the you know,

0:23:01.359 --> 0:23:05.120
<v Speaker 1>like in uh, I don't know, the hard problem of consciousness, etcetera. Yeah,

0:23:05.320 --> 0:23:08.240
<v Speaker 1>or in computer science and they're like, you know, strong

0:23:08.600 --> 0:23:10.680
<v Speaker 1>there is the strong and thropic principle and the weakend

0:23:10.680 --> 0:23:13.360
<v Speaker 1>thropic principle. Yeah there you go. Yeah, I'm not crazy

0:23:14.080 --> 0:23:17.280
<v Speaker 1>that those exist. But that doesn't mean you're not crazy, Okay, Right,

0:23:17.359 --> 0:23:20.359
<v Speaker 1>it's not an exclusionary all right. So, um, it's the

0:23:20.480 --> 0:23:22.720
<v Speaker 1>strong city people, But it's not actually a problem. It's

0:23:22.720 --> 0:23:25.520
<v Speaker 1>more like it's like a strong why does it follow

0:23:25.600 --> 0:23:28.880
<v Speaker 1>the rules? Yeah? Question, it's not really a problem, right,

0:23:28.920 --> 0:23:31.479
<v Speaker 1>Like it's not causing any problem. It's just something that's

0:23:31.520 --> 0:23:35.080
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to understand why it doesn't break the rules. Yeah,

0:23:35.119 --> 0:23:37.760
<v Speaker 1>it's not gonna like fundamentally rip the universe. Apart or something.

0:23:37.760 --> 0:23:40.560
<v Speaker 1>It's not gonna bring the apocalypse upon us or anything.

0:23:40.600 --> 0:23:42.480
<v Speaker 1>We don't have to call Bruce Willis. It's not that

0:23:42.640 --> 0:23:45.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of problem. It's the why does this work that

0:23:45.880 --> 0:23:49.480
<v Speaker 1>way when it doesn't have to? You know, it's it's strange.

0:23:50.000 --> 0:23:52.879
<v Speaker 1>And anytime you see something unexplained and weird, a pattern

0:23:52.920 --> 0:23:55.120
<v Speaker 1>you don't understand in physics, you've got to ask why,

0:23:55.160 --> 0:23:57.800
<v Speaker 1>and you've got to think, is there a simpler explanation?

0:23:57.880 --> 0:24:00.800
<v Speaker 1>Is there something that's making this happen? So some people,

0:24:00.960 --> 0:24:03.480
<v Speaker 1>I guess I had to think of this question, right

0:24:03.520 --> 0:24:06.679
<v Speaker 1>because before you thought that was totally normal. It was

0:24:06.720 --> 0:24:09.359
<v Speaker 1>following the rules, but now it's weird. Suddenly became weird

0:24:09.400 --> 0:24:12.000
<v Speaker 1>that it was following the rule. Yeah, exactly. Once we

0:24:12.040 --> 0:24:14.440
<v Speaker 1>realized the rules could be broken, we thought, hey, how

0:24:14.480 --> 0:24:17.199
<v Speaker 1>come everybody's gonna breaking the rules? Right? Why is the

0:24:17.240 --> 0:24:19.520
<v Speaker 1>strong force over there being so nice but you can

0:24:19.640 --> 0:24:21.920
<v Speaker 1>drive as fast as you want in the highway? Why

0:24:22.000 --> 0:24:24.520
<v Speaker 1>is everyone driving under the speed limit? Yeah? The weak

0:24:24.520 --> 0:24:26.960
<v Speaker 1>forces like driving the wrong way, it's driving any speed,

0:24:26.960 --> 0:24:28.760
<v Speaker 1>it's driving the mill of the night, it's like going

0:24:28.760 --> 0:24:31.719
<v Speaker 1>off road. And the strong forces like driving Miss Daisy

0:24:31.920 --> 0:24:35.680
<v Speaker 1>right down in the right in the correct lane. Oh man,

0:24:36.200 --> 0:24:38.600
<v Speaker 1>all right, so um, so that's weird. And so people

0:24:38.760 --> 0:24:41.560
<v Speaker 1>started asking this question in the seventies. Yeah, it was

0:24:41.560 --> 0:24:44.119
<v Speaker 1>in the seventies that people came up with maybe the

0:24:44.160 --> 0:24:47.639
<v Speaker 1>first answer to this question. People started asking this question

0:24:47.680 --> 0:24:50.960
<v Speaker 1>basically after CP violation was discovered, which is, you know,

0:24:51.240 --> 0:24:53.800
<v Speaker 1>just a few years earlier. And then people came up

0:24:53.800 --> 0:24:57.080
<v Speaker 1>with his explanation, and it's from Roberto Pechy and Helen Quinn.

0:24:57.320 --> 0:25:00.240
<v Speaker 1>There's the nineteen seventy seven and of course very three

0:25:00.359 --> 0:25:03.600
<v Speaker 1>is let's think up a new quantum field that fills

0:25:03.640 --> 0:25:09.240
<v Speaker 1>the whole universe. Like that's the go to course. Let's

0:25:09.359 --> 0:25:12.280
<v Speaker 1>just add more things to the zoo, I know. And

0:25:12.359 --> 0:25:15.560
<v Speaker 1>it feels complicated, right, it feels counterintuitive, like we're trying

0:25:15.560 --> 0:25:18.000
<v Speaker 1>to simplify things, and to simplify things, we have to

0:25:18.080 --> 0:25:21.720
<v Speaker 1>add a new complicated bit. Like yeah, that's all right,

0:25:21.800 --> 0:25:24.640
<v Speaker 1>It's that seems counterintuitive. But it's like say you're trying

0:25:24.640 --> 0:25:26.840
<v Speaker 1>to describe how an engine worked and you were missing

0:25:26.880 --> 0:25:29.320
<v Speaker 1>the pistons. You'd be like, well, this doesn't really make sense.

0:25:29.320 --> 0:25:31.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna add one more piece. Oh look, it all

0:25:31.480 --> 0:25:34.800
<v Speaker 1>clicks together now it makes sense and so sometimes you

0:25:34.840 --> 0:25:37.159
<v Speaker 1>have to add one missing piece in order to make

0:25:37.200 --> 0:25:39.879
<v Speaker 1>the whole machine work, or your understanding of the machine

0:25:39.920 --> 0:25:42.880
<v Speaker 1>work at least. Right. Well, I imagine it's weird because

0:25:43.680 --> 0:25:45.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, really, you guys, I sort of just looking

0:25:45.440 --> 0:25:48.840
<v Speaker 1>at some equations on a page, right, But it's like, oh,

0:25:48.880 --> 0:25:50.680
<v Speaker 1>if I, if I could add just one number here

0:25:50.720 --> 0:25:53.680
<v Speaker 1>would work. But really you're like you're adding a whole

0:25:53.720 --> 0:25:57.040
<v Speaker 1>new field to the entire universe just by putting that number.

0:25:57.119 --> 0:25:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Some of us experimentalists do more than just look at

0:26:00.000 --> 0:26:01.919
<v Speaker 1>pencils and paper, you know, we actually go out and

0:26:02.000 --> 0:26:04.720
<v Speaker 1>smash particles and try to make this stuff. Oh sorry, yeah,

0:26:04.720 --> 0:26:07.800
<v Speaker 1>you also look at computer screens. That's right. That is

0:26:07.840 --> 0:26:11.280
<v Speaker 1>fundamentally different. Okay. My wife used always tease me that

0:26:11.359 --> 0:26:14.320
<v Speaker 1>my research was just quote on the computer and therefore

0:26:14.480 --> 0:26:18.720
<v Speaker 1>wasn't real research. I see, you don't make chemicals, or

0:26:18.920 --> 0:26:20.879
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to wear a lab code. I'm not

0:26:20.920 --> 0:26:23.840
<v Speaker 1>wearing a lab coade, So how can it be science? Right, exam,

0:26:24.080 --> 0:26:26.840
<v Speaker 1>you can, but it's just strictly cosmetic, that's right. And

0:26:26.880 --> 0:26:28.840
<v Speaker 1>so they thought of this field, and they said, well,

0:26:28.880 --> 0:26:31.680
<v Speaker 1>what if there's this new field that fills up all

0:26:31.720 --> 0:26:35.199
<v Speaker 1>of space, and it's connected to the same field that

0:26:35.320 --> 0:26:39.040
<v Speaker 1>controls the strong force, this field of quantum chromodynamics, the

0:26:39.080 --> 0:26:42.960
<v Speaker 1>field of the gluons, these particles that mediate the strong force,

0:26:43.480 --> 0:26:45.720
<v Speaker 1>and what if it talks to those, It like interacts

0:26:45.720 --> 0:26:48.560
<v Speaker 1>with those, and it basically keeps it in line. And

0:26:48.600 --> 0:26:51.320
<v Speaker 1>so there's this new field created in a very early

0:26:51.440 --> 0:26:54.240
<v Speaker 1>universe with everything else, and it sort of pushes the

0:26:54.320 --> 0:26:58.120
<v Speaker 1>strong force in the direction of having no CP violation

0:26:58.280 --> 0:27:01.280
<v Speaker 1>I see, but not the other forces like it only

0:27:01.720 --> 0:27:04.480
<v Speaker 1>somehow affects the strong force. That's right, only affects a

0:27:04.520 --> 0:27:07.879
<v Speaker 1>strong force. And it was created just with everything else.

0:27:08.240 --> 0:27:10.800
<v Speaker 1>And then in the first sort of a few moments

0:27:10.840 --> 0:27:14.720
<v Speaker 1>of the universe, it pushed the strong force towards having

0:27:14.920 --> 0:27:18.880
<v Speaker 1>a zero value for this angle that controls the CP violation.

0:27:18.960 --> 0:27:21.680
<v Speaker 1>So not instantaneously like there may be in like a

0:27:21.800 --> 0:27:24.360
<v Speaker 1>bill of second there in the very early universe where

0:27:24.400 --> 0:27:27.080
<v Speaker 1>the strong force could violate CP. But then it was

0:27:27.119 --> 0:27:30.439
<v Speaker 1>sort of like pushed in line by this other field. Really,

0:27:30.520 --> 0:27:32.480
<v Speaker 1>but I guess my question is why do you need

0:27:32.560 --> 0:27:35.399
<v Speaker 1>this special field? Couldn't did just say that the strong

0:27:35.480 --> 0:27:37.719
<v Speaker 1>force that's the way it is, like it was born

0:27:38.080 --> 0:27:40.159
<v Speaker 1>with this angle. Why do you need to bring in

0:27:40.280 --> 0:27:43.680
<v Speaker 1>like a field that accent it and then somehow disappears. Yeah,

0:27:43.680 --> 0:27:45.800
<v Speaker 1>you could go with the non answer right to say,

0:27:45.880 --> 0:27:49.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, physics doesn't have explanations, so stop asking questions.

0:27:49.720 --> 0:27:52.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, like the numbers just are what they are.

0:27:52.760 --> 0:27:55.080
<v Speaker 1>It's not really satisfying. You wonder like why is it

0:27:55.160 --> 0:27:57.199
<v Speaker 1>this and not that? Especially when the numbers are a

0:27:57.280 --> 0:27:59.720
<v Speaker 1>simple value. I mean, if the number is like point

0:27:59.760 --> 0:28:01.800
<v Speaker 1>four to one seven, you wonder what it is. But

0:28:01.840 --> 0:28:05.119
<v Speaker 1>when the number is like zero or one's just it

0:28:05.240 --> 0:28:07.960
<v Speaker 1>hints at something else happening. It hints at something else

0:28:08.000 --> 0:28:10.639
<v Speaker 1>controlling it. Just like seeing those people drive down the

0:28:10.640 --> 0:28:13.520
<v Speaker 1>street at all the same speed. You wonder what's doing it?

0:28:13.560 --> 0:28:15.119
<v Speaker 1>But I guess you know, like how does it adding

0:28:15.119 --> 0:28:17.000
<v Speaker 1>a whole new field help Because we had a whole

0:28:17.000 --> 0:28:18.600
<v Speaker 1>new field. Then you have to ask why does that

0:28:18.640 --> 0:28:20.840
<v Speaker 1>field exist? Yeah, exactly, just like you have to ask

0:28:21.040 --> 0:28:23.720
<v Speaker 1>why do the pistons exist in the engine. But if

0:28:23.760 --> 0:28:26.760
<v Speaker 1>you think them up, it does simplify all the parts

0:28:26.800 --> 0:28:30.000
<v Speaker 1>working together in the way that you observe. And so

0:28:30.080 --> 0:28:31.639
<v Speaker 1>they thought of this field and they try to make

0:28:31.680 --> 0:28:35.120
<v Speaker 1>it as simple as possible and very naturally connected to

0:28:35.160 --> 0:28:38.440
<v Speaker 1>the strong force, and in in that connection between the

0:28:38.440 --> 0:28:41.640
<v Speaker 1>strong force and this new field forced the strong force

0:28:41.680 --> 0:28:45.880
<v Speaker 1>sort of automatically to have zero CP violation. It's sort

0:28:45.920 --> 0:28:48.800
<v Speaker 1>of like transforming one question into another. You're saying, you know,

0:28:49.200 --> 0:28:52.520
<v Speaker 1>why is this angle? Zero gets transformed into why does

0:28:52.560 --> 0:28:55.280
<v Speaker 1>this field exist? Sure? Okay, and that's I guess that's

0:28:55.280 --> 0:28:58.520
<v Speaker 1>a more comfortable question for you, guys, because because we

0:28:58.600 --> 0:29:02.880
<v Speaker 1>like fields, man, because then without it you get out

0:29:02.880 --> 0:29:06.720
<v Speaker 1>of a job. Well, also, the field is something we

0:29:06.720 --> 0:29:10.080
<v Speaker 1>could discover, right, and so if this field exists, we

0:29:10.120 --> 0:29:12.160
<v Speaker 1>can go out and find it, and then you can ask, Okay,

0:29:12.160 --> 0:29:13.880
<v Speaker 1>why does that field exists? Why do we need all

0:29:13.880 --> 0:29:16.880
<v Speaker 1>these fields? Is it part of some larger strategy. I

0:29:16.920 --> 0:29:19.080
<v Speaker 1>don't know, but it is something that we can test

0:29:19.080 --> 0:29:21.320
<v Speaker 1>and fine, right, as opposed to like just some weird

0:29:21.360 --> 0:29:24.760
<v Speaker 1>property of the strong force. Yeah, you can measure this

0:29:24.840 --> 0:29:27.320
<v Speaker 1>property the strong force all day long and say zero.

0:29:27.360 --> 0:29:29.320
<v Speaker 1>That doesn't help you understand why it happens. If it,

0:29:29.480 --> 0:29:32.360
<v Speaker 1>if it can transform into it's forced to happen because

0:29:32.360 --> 0:29:35.000
<v Speaker 1>this field exists, and we can prove that field exists,

0:29:35.000 --> 0:29:37.240
<v Speaker 1>then we can start to think about the larger puzzle

0:29:37.280 --> 0:29:39.040
<v Speaker 1>and like, well, why this field and does this mean

0:29:39.080 --> 0:29:41.160
<v Speaker 1>other fields have to exist? And what does this tell

0:29:41.200 --> 0:29:43.440
<v Speaker 1>us about the pattern of all the fields, which is

0:29:43.480 --> 0:29:45.880
<v Speaker 1>sort of the larger mission of particle physics is to

0:29:46.160 --> 0:29:48.600
<v Speaker 1>understand how all the fields fit together into one. Right.

0:29:48.640 --> 0:29:51.040
<v Speaker 1>And I guess it's not totally crazy because that's how

0:29:51.040 --> 0:29:53.200
<v Speaker 1>they discovered the Higgs boson, right, Like you thought of

0:29:53.240 --> 0:29:57.160
<v Speaker 1>a field to patch something in your theories, and then

0:29:57.200 --> 0:29:59.440
<v Speaker 1>you found the particle that belonged to that field. So

0:30:00.080 --> 0:30:02.640
<v Speaker 1>it's all sort of been buttoned up. Yeah, exactly. The

0:30:02.720 --> 0:30:05.360
<v Speaker 1>question there was like, why does the photon have no

0:30:05.480 --> 0:30:07.560
<v Speaker 1>masks and these other particles do have masks? Can you

0:30:07.600 --> 0:30:10.440
<v Speaker 1>explain that? And some people were like, hey, just accept

0:30:10.440 --> 0:30:12.640
<v Speaker 1>it and move on, man, but Higgs was like, no,

0:30:13.280 --> 0:30:15.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to create a new field that explains it.

0:30:15.280 --> 0:30:17.240
<v Speaker 1>And he was right. And so now we can of

0:30:17.320 --> 0:30:19.240
<v Speaker 1>course ask a questions like why is there a Higgs

0:30:19.240 --> 0:30:22.040
<v Speaker 1>field dot dot We get to get onto the next question.

0:30:22.640 --> 0:30:26.280
<v Speaker 1>And so just like that, this new field creates a

0:30:26.280 --> 0:30:29.640
<v Speaker 1>new particle, and that new particle is something we could discover,

0:30:30.280 --> 0:30:33.480
<v Speaker 1>all right. And so there's a fun story and by

0:30:33.480 --> 0:30:36.400
<v Speaker 1>fun I mean crazy story about how it was name,

0:30:36.440 --> 0:30:39.080
<v Speaker 1>how they name axion came about, so tells the story.

0:30:39.160 --> 0:30:41.200
<v Speaker 1>So it's it's sort of funny for two reasons. First

0:30:41.200 --> 0:30:43.880
<v Speaker 1>of all, Petchi and Quinn, who thought of this field,

0:30:44.360 --> 0:30:46.840
<v Speaker 1>forgot to name the particle. Like they came up with

0:30:46.880 --> 0:30:50.160
<v Speaker 1>this field, and of course, naturally the field exists, that

0:30:50.280 --> 0:30:52.600
<v Speaker 1>it's possible for the field to get like an excited

0:30:52.640 --> 0:30:54.960
<v Speaker 1>bundle of energy, which we call a particle. But they

0:30:55.000 --> 0:30:59.520
<v Speaker 1>didn't name the particle. And so another physicist came along,

0:30:59.600 --> 0:31:02.320
<v Speaker 1>Frank will Check, who's famous and he won a Nobel

0:31:02.440 --> 0:31:05.880
<v Speaker 1>Prize for understanding how quirks interact with each other with

0:31:05.920 --> 0:31:08.400
<v Speaker 1>a strong force. He decided to name it. He's like, well,

0:31:08.480 --> 0:31:10.959
<v Speaker 1>let's think about this field and how we might see it.

0:31:11.000 --> 0:31:13.000
<v Speaker 1>And of course he thought about the particle, and then

0:31:13.000 --> 0:31:15.080
<v Speaker 1>he had to give it a name. No how he

0:31:15.160 --> 0:31:17.640
<v Speaker 1>got to name it, but the particle already had parents.

0:31:17.920 --> 0:31:19.720
<v Speaker 1>How can you just go in and like name somebody

0:31:19.720 --> 0:31:22.200
<v Speaker 1>else's kids. Say you met a family and they didn't

0:31:22.280 --> 0:31:24.120
<v Speaker 1>give their kids a name, you would probably come up

0:31:24.120 --> 0:31:26.120
<v Speaker 1>with a nickname for it, right, You wouldn't want to

0:31:26.120 --> 0:31:29.280
<v Speaker 1>say that kid's name. I would tell the parents to

0:31:29.320 --> 0:31:31.760
<v Speaker 1>give him a name. I would ask the parents, what

0:31:31.800 --> 0:31:33.680
<v Speaker 1>do they call what do they say when they want

0:31:33.680 --> 0:31:35.520
<v Speaker 1>the kid to come over? Well, then you are more

0:31:35.560 --> 0:31:38.240
<v Speaker 1>modest than Frank will Check, which is true for almost

0:31:38.240 --> 0:31:41.239
<v Speaker 1>all of humanity anyway. Oh my goodness. So wait they

0:31:41.360 --> 0:31:44.760
<v Speaker 1>but did they name? Did Peshi and Helen Quinn name

0:31:44.880 --> 0:31:46.800
<v Speaker 1>the field at least? Or did they just say like

0:31:47.040 --> 0:31:49.000
<v Speaker 1>a field? Yeah, a field? They just gave it a

0:31:49.080 --> 0:31:51.440
<v Speaker 1>mathematical symbol, right. They didn't give a name to the

0:31:51.480 --> 0:31:54.120
<v Speaker 1>particle that comes from it. And so you know, if

0:31:54.120 --> 0:31:56.800
<v Speaker 1>Frank Wilcheck had been less modest, he would have called

0:31:56.840 --> 0:31:59.280
<v Speaker 1>it the Petchy Quinn particle or something, or the field

0:31:59.400 --> 0:32:01.760
<v Speaker 1>or what will Check called the field? Yeah, well now

0:32:01.840 --> 0:32:05.560
<v Speaker 1>it's called the Axion field. Oh man, he totally took

0:32:05.600 --> 0:32:08.400
<v Speaker 1>it over. He totally took it over. And on top

0:32:08.440 --> 0:32:11.000
<v Speaker 1>of that, he gave it a totally ridiculous name, like

0:32:11.240 --> 0:32:13.640
<v Speaker 1>Axon is a cool name. But he got the idea

0:32:13.680 --> 0:32:16.239
<v Speaker 1>when he was grocery shop. Oh no, what happened. He

0:32:16.280 --> 0:32:19.000
<v Speaker 1>was in the aisle for laundry detergent and he saw

0:32:19.080 --> 0:32:24.440
<v Speaker 1>this laundry detergent called Axion detergent booster, and he thought Axion,

0:32:24.760 --> 0:32:28.440
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of a cool name. Oh no, well, he

0:32:28.520 --> 0:32:31.240
<v Speaker 1>was what was he thinking, like this particle that I'm

0:32:31.280 --> 0:32:35.400
<v Speaker 1>earth surfing and stealing from this other other physicists would

0:32:35.400 --> 0:32:38.200
<v Speaker 1>clean everything up pretty well. So, hey, laundry detergent makes

0:32:38.240 --> 0:32:40.920
<v Speaker 1>perfect sense. It's a physics booster, so we need a

0:32:40.920 --> 0:32:45.560
<v Speaker 1>detergent booster. Yeah, so somebody in some marketing department created

0:32:45.600 --> 0:32:48.920
<v Speaker 1>the name for this laundry detergent, which ended up naming

0:32:48.960 --> 0:32:53.160
<v Speaker 1>a theoretical particle. But didn't they copyrighted? Can you do that?

0:32:53.160 --> 0:32:55.520
<v Speaker 1>That's a great question. Can you name a particle after

0:32:55.640 --> 0:32:58.120
<v Speaker 1>like U copyrighting your name in a particle like the

0:32:58.200 --> 0:33:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Nintendo Switch particle or like the Netflix particle. Can't do that?

0:33:04.040 --> 0:33:05.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, that's a question for our legal department, for

0:33:06.000 --> 0:33:08.960
<v Speaker 1>the physics lawyers. You stumped me on that one. Through

0:33:09.120 --> 0:33:11.720
<v Speaker 1>the physics lawyers, of whom I am not one. And

0:33:11.760 --> 0:33:14.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, there was competition. There were other famous Nobel

0:33:14.920 --> 0:33:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Prize winning physicists like Stephen Weinberg. He wanted to call

0:33:18.600 --> 0:33:20.920
<v Speaker 1>it the Higgs lit because he thought, oh, this is

0:33:21.000 --> 0:33:23.000
<v Speaker 1>only reminds me a little bit of the Higgs boson,

0:33:23.120 --> 0:33:24.880
<v Speaker 1>So he wanted to call it things you're gonna say.

0:33:24.920 --> 0:33:30.280
<v Speaker 1>You wanted to name it clox or Kleenex or the

0:33:30.320 --> 0:33:34.000
<v Speaker 1>tidy no particle um no and accalon sort of stuck.

0:33:34.000 --> 0:33:36.320
<v Speaker 1>And you know, these things are not fair, and they're

0:33:36.360 --> 0:33:38.960
<v Speaker 1>not always done the right way. Like we talked about

0:33:39.000 --> 0:33:42.440
<v Speaker 1>how quirks are named quarks because the famous physicists came

0:33:42.480 --> 0:33:44.920
<v Speaker 1>up with the name, even though a young physicist came

0:33:45.000 --> 0:33:47.120
<v Speaker 1>up with the name aces before that and it was

0:33:47.160 --> 0:33:49.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of buried in obscurity. But these things are not

0:33:50.000 --> 0:33:52.920
<v Speaker 1>always done correctly. They're not always given to the people

0:33:52.960 --> 0:33:56.800
<v Speaker 1>who to That's right, Yeah, it's not always fair. It's

0:33:56.840 --> 0:33:59.400
<v Speaker 1>just sort of like what people end up calling something.

0:33:59.480 --> 0:34:03.200
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well let's get into why this action is

0:34:03.320 --> 0:34:07.680
<v Speaker 1>super duper cool and why we think it could be real.

0:34:08.000 --> 0:34:22.120
<v Speaker 1>But first let's take a quick break. All right, Daniel,

0:34:22.160 --> 0:34:25.080
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about the Axon and it got its name

0:34:25.080 --> 0:34:28.920
<v Speaker 1>from a laundry detergent, which is I guess not too

0:34:28.920 --> 0:34:32.839
<v Speaker 1>surprising in physics, because you know, I'm not impressed by

0:34:32.840 --> 0:34:36.520
<v Speaker 1>the general imagination and naming things. But it is a

0:34:36.520 --> 0:34:38.879
<v Speaker 1>cool sounding name at least, you know, it satisfies your

0:34:38.920 --> 0:34:42.120
<v Speaker 1>transformer principle. Well well, why then did you still Megatron's name,

0:34:42.239 --> 0:34:46.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, Optimus Prime? Yeah, maybe they had better lawyers. Right,

0:34:46.480 --> 0:34:48.640
<v Speaker 1>the detergent companies lawyers are not as good as the

0:34:48.719 --> 0:34:53.760
<v Speaker 1>transformers has bro. Yeah, that is a little bit scarier. Alright.

0:34:53.800 --> 0:34:56.520
<v Speaker 1>So you're telling me that this particle is cool because

0:34:56.520 --> 0:34:59.360
<v Speaker 1>it would answer the question of why the strong force

0:34:59.800 --> 0:35:03.520
<v Speaker 1>the is not violate some of these symmetry conditions in

0:35:03.560 --> 0:35:06.200
<v Speaker 1>the universe and that. But it could also be cool

0:35:06.200 --> 0:35:09.360
<v Speaker 1>because it explained another big problem. Yeah, there's another big

0:35:09.400 --> 0:35:14.040
<v Speaker 1>problem in particle physics, which is where is all the stuff? Right,

0:35:14.120 --> 0:35:16.880
<v Speaker 1>we know that most of the stuff in the universe

0:35:17.239 --> 0:35:20.160
<v Speaker 1>is not made of quarks and electrons or any other

0:35:20.280 --> 0:35:22.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of familiar matter. It's a man of this new

0:35:22.719 --> 0:35:25.600
<v Speaker 1>thing that we call dark matter, even though we don't

0:35:25.640 --> 0:35:28.359
<v Speaker 1>really know what it is. And just like with the

0:35:28.360 --> 0:35:31.560
<v Speaker 1>other sort of physics mysteries, we see evidence for it

0:35:31.719 --> 0:35:34.880
<v Speaker 1>and how galaxy spin and how light bends through space,

0:35:35.040 --> 0:35:37.040
<v Speaker 1>but we don't know what it is and what it's

0:35:37.080 --> 0:35:39.520
<v Speaker 1>made out of. So it's one of the biggest pressing

0:35:39.640 --> 0:35:42.920
<v Speaker 1>questions in particle physics, or I think in modern science,

0:35:43.520 --> 0:35:46.839
<v Speaker 1>what is the matter of the unit? What is dark matter? Right?

0:35:46.920 --> 0:35:50.000
<v Speaker 1>And so it could be axios, it could be laundry detergent,

0:35:50.120 --> 0:35:52.960
<v Speaker 1>it could be exactly the dark matter could be scrubbing

0:35:53.000 --> 0:35:57.319
<v Speaker 1>the universe. It seems ironic that dark matter would be

0:35:57.400 --> 0:36:00.960
<v Speaker 1>something that's supposed to get the stains out reisely. Well,

0:36:01.000 --> 0:36:03.040
<v Speaker 1>it satisfies a lot of the requirements you need for

0:36:03.080 --> 0:36:06.000
<v Speaker 1>a dark matter doesn't interact with normal matter, so we

0:36:06.000 --> 0:36:08.759
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't have seen it. That's what makes it dark. It

0:36:08.840 --> 0:36:12.000
<v Speaker 1>has some mass to it, although it's very very light.

0:36:12.160 --> 0:36:14.080
<v Speaker 1>So if it were dark matter, you would need like

0:36:14.120 --> 0:36:18.000
<v Speaker 1>a ridiculous number of these things. You need like two

0:36:18.080 --> 0:36:21.759
<v Speaker 1>hundred billion just to make the mass of one electron,

0:36:22.480 --> 0:36:25.319
<v Speaker 1>and we need enough to make five times as much

0:36:25.360 --> 0:36:28.480
<v Speaker 1>mass as everything in the universe. And so like, if

0:36:28.640 --> 0:36:31.600
<v Speaker 1>axions are the dark matter and they are real, then

0:36:31.640 --> 0:36:36.440
<v Speaker 1>we are swimming and swimming and jillions of axions all

0:36:36.440 --> 0:36:41.720
<v Speaker 1>the time, meaning that um, if these particles exist and

0:36:41.760 --> 0:36:45.560
<v Speaker 1>they explained this strong force problem, they could also be there,

0:36:45.600 --> 0:36:47.640
<v Speaker 1>but we wouldn't see them. Like they don't interact with

0:36:47.680 --> 0:36:51.920
<v Speaker 1>the electromagnetism. That's right, they don't interact with electromagnetism, and

0:36:51.920 --> 0:36:54.799
<v Speaker 1>they do connect to the strong force, but only in

0:36:54.840 --> 0:36:58.400
<v Speaker 1>this way that they make the strong force not violate CP.

0:36:59.000 --> 0:37:02.520
<v Speaker 1>The field also has some other super duper heavy particles

0:37:02.560 --> 0:37:05.120
<v Speaker 1>in it that do interact with a strong force, but

0:37:05.160 --> 0:37:07.960
<v Speaker 1>they're so heavy that they potentially don't exist, and so

0:37:08.000 --> 0:37:10.799
<v Speaker 1>we don't have to worry about them. And so effectively,

0:37:10.880 --> 0:37:14.200
<v Speaker 1>axions are totally inert except for the fact that they

0:37:14.200 --> 0:37:17.080
<v Speaker 1>have a small mass. And so if they have this mass,

0:37:17.239 --> 0:37:20.600
<v Speaker 1>then they contribute to gravity. And that's what dark matter is.

0:37:20.640 --> 0:37:24.120
<v Speaker 1>It's something mysterious out there that's adding gravity to the universe,

0:37:24.120 --> 0:37:26.920
<v Speaker 1>and so it could be the act All right, well,

0:37:26.960 --> 0:37:29.200
<v Speaker 1>would that be sort of a coincidence that we have

0:37:29.400 --> 0:37:31.799
<v Speaker 1>this particle and it just so happens to fill in

0:37:31.840 --> 0:37:34.719
<v Speaker 1>the blankford dark matter? It would be amazing, Like who

0:37:34.760 --> 0:37:38.400
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't want to solve two big problems in physics at once, Right,

0:37:38.840 --> 0:37:41.280
<v Speaker 1>you think of this particle to solve one problem, and boom,

0:37:41.280 --> 0:37:43.040
<v Speaker 1>it turns out to solve the other problem at the

0:37:43.080 --> 0:37:46.640
<v Speaker 1>same time. You can collect two Nobel Prizes in one trip.

0:37:47.040 --> 0:37:48.719
<v Speaker 1>I mean that sounds pretty. You get to like, do

0:37:48.760 --> 0:37:51.640
<v Speaker 1>you get too in the same ceremony? I wonder I

0:37:51.680 --> 0:37:53.480
<v Speaker 1>think you have to come back the next year. I'm

0:37:53.480 --> 0:37:56.040
<v Speaker 1>not sure, but that's attractive but also makes you a

0:37:56.040 --> 0:37:59.440
<v Speaker 1>little suspicious, Like we thought this particle up to explain

0:37:59.520 --> 0:38:01.920
<v Speaker 1>the strong ep problem, and then we have this other problem.

0:38:01.960 --> 0:38:04.640
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna try to sort of squeeze this particle into

0:38:04.680 --> 0:38:07.960
<v Speaker 1>solving the dark matter problem. It actually sort of reflects

0:38:08.040 --> 0:38:10.359
<v Speaker 1>something else about the dark matter problem, which is that

0:38:10.480 --> 0:38:14.239
<v Speaker 1>we're getting a teensy bit desperate. Like we thought we

0:38:14.280 --> 0:38:16.160
<v Speaker 1>would have figured out dark matter by now. We had

0:38:16.200 --> 0:38:19.480
<v Speaker 1>better ideas for what dark matter could be, these weakly

0:38:19.520 --> 0:38:22.840
<v Speaker 1>interacting massive particles stuff like that, and none of that

0:38:22.880 --> 0:38:25.239
<v Speaker 1>has really panned out, and so now we're sort of

0:38:25.280 --> 0:38:27.600
<v Speaker 1>like dragging along the bottom of the barrel looking for

0:38:27.640 --> 0:38:31.000
<v Speaker 1>other ideas that might explain dark matter. And so that

0:38:31.160 --> 0:38:34.320
<v Speaker 1>sort of led to a resurgence and interest in the axons.

0:38:34.320 --> 0:38:38.160
<v Speaker 1>People think, wait a second, what about axons? Maybe those

0:38:38.200 --> 0:38:40.239
<v Speaker 1>could be the dark matter. Like so desperate, you're reaching

0:38:40.280 --> 0:38:45.160
<v Speaker 1>for the non brand laud exactly what you're saying, that's

0:38:45.160 --> 0:38:47.319
<v Speaker 1>exactly where we are. And it could also maybe solve

0:38:47.360 --> 0:38:49.719
<v Speaker 1>another big problem, right it could it could solve another

0:38:49.760 --> 0:38:52.040
<v Speaker 1>big problem. That was a really fascinating paper out there

0:38:52.480 --> 0:38:55.360
<v Speaker 1>last year that talked about those first few moments in

0:38:55.400 --> 0:38:58.440
<v Speaker 1>the universe when this field was created and it forced

0:38:58.440 --> 0:39:01.479
<v Speaker 1>the strong field to not violate CP and it turns

0:39:01.480 --> 0:39:04.359
<v Speaker 1>out when it did that, it had sort of two directions.

0:39:04.440 --> 0:39:07.759
<v Speaker 1>It could go sort of like imagine a marble in

0:39:07.800 --> 0:39:10.760
<v Speaker 1>an upside down hat, and it's rolling towards the bottom,

0:39:10.840 --> 0:39:13.120
<v Speaker 1>and that's how it forces the strong force to not

0:39:13.239 --> 0:39:16.520
<v Speaker 1>violate CP. But if instead of just rolling strength down,

0:39:16.600 --> 0:39:18.359
<v Speaker 1>what if it had like a little bit of a kick,

0:39:18.560 --> 0:39:20.400
<v Speaker 1>so it sort of went around in a circle and

0:39:20.400 --> 0:39:23.279
<v Speaker 1>then relaxed to the center, then it could have done

0:39:23.280 --> 0:39:27.640
<v Speaker 1>it clockwise or counterclockwise. Oh boy, it's like another symmetry.

0:39:27.680 --> 0:39:30.560
<v Speaker 1>It's another symmetry. And it turns out if it goes clockwise,

0:39:30.840 --> 0:39:33.239
<v Speaker 1>then the universe is filled with matter, and if it

0:39:33.239 --> 0:39:37.880
<v Speaker 1>goes counterclockwise, the universe is filled with anti matter. What

0:39:38.440 --> 0:39:40.719
<v Speaker 1>it's like flipping a coin. We could have been made

0:39:40.719 --> 0:39:43.840
<v Speaker 1>out of antimatter. Yes, And that's a big question in physics,

0:39:43.960 --> 0:39:46.120
<v Speaker 1>is like why is the universe made out of matter

0:39:46.200 --> 0:39:48.840
<v Speaker 1>and not antimatter? And we don't know. And it feels

0:39:48.880 --> 0:39:50.960
<v Speaker 1>like a coin was flipped and it could be that

0:39:51.040 --> 0:39:55.280
<v Speaker 1>this was the coin. It was a laundry detergent coin

0:39:55.560 --> 0:39:59.800
<v Speaker 1>that determined the entire universe. Yeah, and so the axon

0:40:00.000 --> 0:40:04.280
<v Speaker 1>could solve this other problem also, so it really could

0:40:04.280 --> 0:40:07.320
<v Speaker 1>be key to a lot of these big, big mysteries

0:40:07.400 --> 0:40:09.840
<v Speaker 1>in particle physics. And I guess you're because I imagine

0:40:09.880 --> 0:40:12.040
<v Speaker 1>you were saying that this is not the only idea,

0:40:12.160 --> 0:40:16.160
<v Speaker 1>like this is not the only field or particle that

0:40:16.200 --> 0:40:19.080
<v Speaker 1>people have dreamed of, but this one is somehow more

0:40:19.120 --> 0:40:22.719
<v Speaker 1>attractive because it's sort of makes more sense, well, because

0:40:22.760 --> 0:40:24.600
<v Speaker 1>the other ones have been sort of ruled out. You know,

0:40:24.680 --> 0:40:26.440
<v Speaker 1>you have your first idea, you go look for it,

0:40:26.640 --> 0:40:29.279
<v Speaker 1>the experiment says no, sorry. Then you go for your

0:40:29.280 --> 0:40:31.520
<v Speaker 1>second idea, you know, and you just keep looking through

0:40:31.560 --> 0:40:34.320
<v Speaker 1>ideas until you find one that the universe says yes to.

0:40:35.719 --> 0:40:37.840
<v Speaker 1>And so that's sort of led to a resurgence. And

0:40:37.920 --> 0:40:41.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, also theoretical physics, there are trends, there are fads.

0:40:41.360 --> 0:40:43.440
<v Speaker 1>People get excited about an idea and they work on

0:40:43.480 --> 0:40:45.720
<v Speaker 1>it furiously, and then they get bored with it. Somebody

0:40:45.719 --> 0:40:47.759
<v Speaker 1>else comes up with a new idea, and so the

0:40:47.800 --> 0:40:50.959
<v Speaker 1>idea sort of have cycles. You know, People get bored

0:40:50.960 --> 0:40:53.319
<v Speaker 1>of an idea, put it aside, and then twenty years later,

0:40:53.440 --> 0:40:56.160
<v Speaker 1>some new young woman says, hey, I have found a

0:40:56.200 --> 0:40:58.640
<v Speaker 1>new way to use this old idea, and then everybody

0:40:58.640 --> 0:41:01.680
<v Speaker 1>gets excited about it. Again, it's a human endeavor, all right.

0:41:01.680 --> 0:41:04.120
<v Speaker 1>So then the action is is trending is what you're saying,

0:41:04.600 --> 0:41:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Like it's it's having a popularity, surgeon popularity. And so

0:41:09.239 --> 0:41:11.839
<v Speaker 1>I guess the question is is it real? Like does

0:41:11.880 --> 0:41:14.640
<v Speaker 1>it actually exist? And can I find it in places

0:41:14.719 --> 0:41:18.040
<v Speaker 1>not my laundry the diurgent aisle at my grocery store. Well,

0:41:18.080 --> 0:41:20.320
<v Speaker 1>we don't know, but there are experiments out there to

0:41:20.440 --> 0:41:23.480
<v Speaker 1>look for it, sort of two different categories of experiments

0:41:23.480 --> 0:41:27.840
<v Speaker 1>that both use magnetic fields. The idea is that the

0:41:27.920 --> 0:41:31.320
<v Speaker 1>axion is still or like a photon and it doesn't

0:41:31.320 --> 0:41:33.920
<v Speaker 1>interact with photons and normally, but it turns out that

0:41:33.960 --> 0:41:37.240
<v Speaker 1>if you put the axion into a super duper strong

0:41:37.320 --> 0:41:42.399
<v Speaker 1>magnetic field, then sometimes it will turn into photons. Wait,

0:41:42.440 --> 0:41:46.680
<v Speaker 1>a magnetic magnetic field can cause particles to change. Yes,

0:41:46.719 --> 0:41:49.640
<v Speaker 1>the magnetic field will change the way the particles interact. Right,

0:41:49.680 --> 0:41:52.160
<v Speaker 1>it has energy in it, and if those particles can

0:41:52.520 --> 0:41:55.920
<v Speaker 1>feel photons in any sort of way, then they can

0:41:55.960 --> 0:41:58.240
<v Speaker 1>get enhanced and they can change the way they decay.

0:41:58.800 --> 0:42:01.800
<v Speaker 1>And so the axion and if it's in a chamber

0:42:01.920 --> 0:42:04.760
<v Speaker 1>that sort of resonates with it and it's that chamber

0:42:04.800 --> 0:42:07.360
<v Speaker 1>is filled with magnetic field, and this magnetic fields is

0:42:07.400 --> 0:42:10.840
<v Speaker 1>like a hundred and fifty thousand times the strength of

0:42:10.840 --> 0:42:13.960
<v Speaker 1>the Earth's magnetic field, then it could sometimes turn into

0:42:14.080 --> 0:42:17.920
<v Speaker 1>like little microwave photons. So they have this cavity up

0:42:17.960 --> 0:42:21.279
<v Speaker 1>in University of Washington where they have very cold and

0:42:21.320 --> 0:42:23.920
<v Speaker 1>they have a very powerful magnetic field, and they're just

0:42:24.000 --> 0:42:27.680
<v Speaker 1>listening for a little microwave blip, so that we can't

0:42:27.719 --> 0:42:30.359
<v Speaker 1>see them, but they might turn into things. We can

0:42:30.400 --> 0:42:33.560
<v Speaker 1>see them precisely into in need these weird conditions, in

0:42:33.760 --> 0:42:37.840
<v Speaker 1>very strange, very strong conditions, they might turn into photons. Really,

0:42:37.920 --> 0:42:40.359
<v Speaker 1>you can predict that with the equations. The equations say

0:42:40.400 --> 0:42:43.319
<v Speaker 1>should happen if you get the magnetic field at the

0:42:43.440 --> 0:42:47.040
<v Speaker 1>right frequency and you get it down to cold enough conditions,

0:42:47.520 --> 0:42:49.000
<v Speaker 1>and they've been running it for a while and they

0:42:49.000 --> 0:42:50.920
<v Speaker 1>haven't seen them, but they're sort of like tuning the

0:42:50.960 --> 0:42:53.439
<v Speaker 1>magnetic field, like are they over here? Are they over there?

0:42:53.920 --> 0:42:56.200
<v Speaker 1>And so far they haven't seen anything, but it's sort

0:42:56.200 --> 0:43:00.000
<v Speaker 1>of getting more and more powerful. The device pretty cool.

0:43:00.000 --> 0:43:01.759
<v Speaker 1>All So that's one way. What's the other way that

0:43:01.840 --> 0:43:03.960
<v Speaker 1>we might see them? The other way, sort of the opposite,

0:43:04.000 --> 0:43:07.720
<v Speaker 1>is to try to turn light into axions, Like instead

0:43:07.719 --> 0:43:11.040
<v Speaker 1>of having axon turn into photons, turn that around. Take

0:43:11.080 --> 0:43:13.279
<v Speaker 1>a beam of light and try to turn it into

0:43:13.360 --> 0:43:17.600
<v Speaker 1>axions by putting the light. Yeah, like make light disappear. Yes,

0:43:17.880 --> 0:43:21.080
<v Speaker 1>And so this experiment is called light shining through walls

0:43:21.120 --> 0:43:23.920
<v Speaker 1>because you basically have a wall and a really strong

0:43:23.960 --> 0:43:26.640
<v Speaker 1>magnetic field and then a beam of light and the

0:43:26.680 --> 0:43:30.040
<v Speaker 1>ideas maybe the light will turn into axions which can

0:43:30.040 --> 0:43:32.399
<v Speaker 1>then pass through the wall with no problem, which will

0:43:32.440 --> 0:43:34.960
<v Speaker 1>then turn back into light and you can sort of

0:43:35.000 --> 0:43:37.960
<v Speaker 1>like have your light, you know, passed through the wall

0:43:38.000 --> 0:43:40.960
<v Speaker 1>by phase through the wall, by becoming an axon as

0:43:41.000 --> 0:43:43.200
<v Speaker 1>it's going through the wall. I feel I feel like

0:43:43.200 --> 0:43:45.239
<v Speaker 1>you're getting to the point where you're like, we need

0:43:45.280 --> 0:43:47.479
<v Speaker 1>ideas or what's what's this is? This is a comic book?

0:43:47.560 --> 0:43:50.160
<v Speaker 1>What there was a superhero that can go through walls?

0:43:50.160 --> 0:43:53.839
<v Speaker 1>Oh that sounds like a great idea. Yeah, well it's

0:43:53.840 --> 0:43:55.799
<v Speaker 1>pretty cool because if we figured out then we could

0:43:55.840 --> 0:43:58.879
<v Speaker 1>actually build beams of light that go through walls. Right.

0:43:59.200 --> 0:44:01.440
<v Speaker 1>So also sort a cool experiment because you just need

0:44:01.480 --> 0:44:03.640
<v Speaker 1>like a light beam and a wall and then you

0:44:03.719 --> 0:44:06.480
<v Speaker 1>just look for light making it through the wall. Right,

0:44:06.520 --> 0:44:12.160
<v Speaker 1>So it's pretty dramatic, seething magical X rays. Yeah yeah,

0:44:12.200 --> 0:44:14.839
<v Speaker 1>turning light and X rays making them penetrate just like

0:44:15.000 --> 0:44:17.600
<v Speaker 1>X rays. And it's pretty fun, you know, to see

0:44:17.640 --> 0:44:21.040
<v Speaker 1>these experiments. These are clever ideas, These are wacky ideas,

0:44:21.120 --> 0:44:24.680
<v Speaker 1>and personally, I never expect these experiments to actually discover

0:44:24.760 --> 0:44:29.719
<v Speaker 1>the axion. What though, isn't this your field? This is

0:44:29.840 --> 0:44:32.960
<v Speaker 1>my field? Yes, but the accon has always seems sort of,

0:44:33.320 --> 0:44:35.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, out there to me, like too crazy.

0:44:36.000 --> 0:44:38.399
<v Speaker 1>An idea just feels like a little bit out there

0:44:38.400 --> 0:44:41.600
<v Speaker 1>in left field, like yeah, it's a little too sutsy.

0:44:41.719 --> 0:44:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Like I've read this interview with Helen Quinn, one of

0:44:44.520 --> 0:44:46.800
<v Speaker 1>the two people who came up with the original idea,

0:44:47.040 --> 0:44:49.759
<v Speaker 1>and even she's a little amused that this idea is

0:44:49.760 --> 0:44:52.040
<v Speaker 1>still lacks She's like, I don't know what all the

0:44:52.040 --> 0:44:55.520
<v Speaker 1>fuzzes about. Direct quote from her is Roberto and I

0:44:55.560 --> 0:44:57.560
<v Speaker 1>spent a few months cooking up this theory, and now

0:44:57.600 --> 0:45:01.640
<v Speaker 1>the experimentalist has spent forty years look for it. She's

0:45:01.719 --> 0:45:05.600
<v Speaker 1>laughing at you, Daniel, It's like she's she's amused by you.

0:45:05.719 --> 0:45:07.640
<v Speaker 1>The whole thing was a joke to begin with. What

0:45:07.760 --> 0:45:10.560
<v Speaker 1>you guys doing wasting your time, Like that's what. We

0:45:10.600 --> 0:45:13.439
<v Speaker 1>didn't give it a name. It was all a big

0:45:13.440 --> 0:45:16.600
<v Speaker 1>practical joke, and then we planted the detergent for Frank

0:45:16.600 --> 0:45:19.759
<v Speaker 1>whil Chick to find it using their time travel device, right,

0:45:20.080 --> 0:45:24.160
<v Speaker 1>their magical X ray life. But it's fun, and you know,

0:45:24.239 --> 0:45:28.560
<v Speaker 1>sometimes an idea can begin from a silly place, just exploring,

0:45:28.680 --> 0:45:31.120
<v Speaker 1>just fuxing around with the math, and then turn into

0:45:31.160 --> 0:45:33.840
<v Speaker 1>something real. I mean, if the axion is real and

0:45:33.880 --> 0:45:37.000
<v Speaker 1>it solves these big open questions in physics, then that

0:45:37.040 --> 0:45:39.440
<v Speaker 1>would have been a productive few months cooking up that

0:45:39.480 --> 0:45:42.719
<v Speaker 1>crazy theory and productive forty years because you know, like

0:45:42.760 --> 0:45:44.680
<v Speaker 1>the it's almost like the Higgs boson, right, do you

0:45:44.719 --> 0:45:47.439
<v Speaker 1>predicted it? And like forty years later they found it. Yeah,

0:45:47.440 --> 0:45:49.880
<v Speaker 1>it took almost fifty years to find the Higgs. So

0:45:49.960 --> 0:45:52.240
<v Speaker 1>sometimes you come up with a theory for a particle

0:45:52.320 --> 0:45:55.160
<v Speaker 1>that's really really hard to find. It's not always easy

0:45:55.239 --> 0:45:56.640
<v Speaker 1>to go out and just like look for this thing,

0:45:56.680 --> 0:45:58.840
<v Speaker 1>even if you know what it's supposed to do and

0:45:58.880 --> 0:46:01.799
<v Speaker 1>how it's supposed to look, creating those conditions to find

0:46:01.840 --> 0:46:04.480
<v Speaker 1>it is not always easy, especially if it's elusive. I mean,

0:46:04.560 --> 0:46:06.640
<v Speaker 1>if it's the dark matter. Then it's been hiding for

0:46:06.680 --> 0:46:09.120
<v Speaker 1>a long time, and and the stakes are pretty high, Like,

0:46:09.200 --> 0:46:11.360
<v Speaker 1>if you find it, it would explain to so many things,

0:46:11.400 --> 0:46:15.719
<v Speaker 1>including dark matter and antimatter and strong CP problem. Yeah,

0:46:15.880 --> 0:46:18.399
<v Speaker 1>it would really close off a lot of big open

0:46:18.480 --> 0:46:20.279
<v Speaker 1>questions in physics. So from that point of view, I

0:46:20.560 --> 0:46:22.920
<v Speaker 1>sort of hope it is real because they would be

0:46:22.920 --> 0:46:25.799
<v Speaker 1>a fascinating inside into the universe. And then, like as

0:46:25.840 --> 0:46:28.360
<v Speaker 1>always with physics, when we get to ask the next question,

0:46:28.440 --> 0:46:31.200
<v Speaker 1>like all right, well, why is there an axion? What

0:46:31.239 --> 0:46:34.080
<v Speaker 1>does that mean? Is there another axion? You know, the

0:46:34.160 --> 0:46:37.600
<v Speaker 1>whole spectrum of axion particles, And so the questions never

0:46:37.640 --> 0:46:41.279
<v Speaker 1>really end right whenever there are lawyers that the Axon Corporation,

0:46:41.400 --> 0:46:43.319
<v Speaker 1>they're like just waiting for you guys to discover it

0:46:43.440 --> 0:46:47.600
<v Speaker 1>to give them that marketing boost in popular culture, or

0:46:47.680 --> 0:46:50.279
<v Speaker 1>that's when they're going to see right there you go,

0:46:50.680 --> 0:46:54.400
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna they're waiting, like, we own this. You can't

0:46:54.520 --> 0:46:58.359
<v Speaker 1>you can't make X rays light special laser beams without us.

0:46:58.480 --> 0:47:00.840
<v Speaker 1>That's right, We demand you pack up all your axions

0:47:00.880 --> 0:47:04.040
<v Speaker 1>and boxes and send them to us immediately. Alright, Well,

0:47:04.080 --> 0:47:06.719
<v Speaker 1>I think as usual, this just points to the things

0:47:06.760 --> 0:47:09.400
<v Speaker 1>we don't know and how you know, science is actively

0:47:09.600 --> 0:47:12.359
<v Speaker 1>still trying to explain the universe. That's right, And then

0:47:12.360 --> 0:47:14.319
<v Speaker 1>a hundred years we could look back and think, what

0:47:14.360 --> 0:47:17.720
<v Speaker 1>was it like before physics knew about the axion particle

0:47:18.280 --> 0:47:20.759
<v Speaker 1>or the chlorox particle or whatever it is we're going

0:47:20.800 --> 0:47:23.640
<v Speaker 1>to discover in twenty years, but before we know it,

0:47:23.640 --> 0:47:26.480
<v Speaker 1>it's just an idea. It feels very different to be

0:47:26.600 --> 0:47:29.480
<v Speaker 1>on the ignorance side of a discovery than on the

0:47:29.520 --> 0:47:31.920
<v Speaker 1>knowledge side, because you never know what could turn out

0:47:31.920 --> 0:47:33.799
<v Speaker 1>to be true. That's right, because the universe is no

0:47:33.920 --> 0:47:37.279
<v Speaker 1>strangers to weirdness. All right, Well, we hope you enjoyed that.

0:47:37.560 --> 0:47:40.440
<v Speaker 1>And the next time you're going down the grocery store

0:47:40.760 --> 0:47:44.759
<v Speaker 1>laundry detergent, I'll look around. You might discover a new

0:47:44.880 --> 0:47:49.600
<v Speaker 1>particle that explains the universe. Keep your eyes open, or

0:47:49.640 --> 0:47:52.439
<v Speaker 1>at least discover a cool name for somebody else's good idea.

0:47:52.680 --> 0:48:02.840
<v Speaker 1>You go. Thanks for joining us. Let's see you next time. Yeah,

0:48:03.880 --> 0:48:06.680
<v Speaker 1>thanks for listening, and remember that. Daniel and Jorge Explain

0:48:06.760 --> 0:48:09.600
<v Speaker 1>the Universe is a production of I Heart Radio. For

0:48:09.760 --> 0:48:12.680
<v Speaker 1>more podcast for my heart Radio, visit the i Heart

0:48:12.800 --> 0:48:16.359
<v Speaker 1>Radio app, Apple podcasts or wherever you listen to your

0:48:16.440 --> 0:48:17.160
<v Speaker 1>favorite shows,