WEBVTT - Thomas Morris: The Dublin Railway Murder 

0:00:00.840 --> 0:00:13.320
<v Speaker 1>This story contains adult content and language. Listener discretion is advised, so.

0:00:13.360 --> 0:00:17.000
<v Speaker 2>He turns into a sort of horribly compelling character and

0:00:17.160 --> 0:00:21.320
<v Speaker 2>one who certainly behaved in the most appalling way.

0:00:26.160 --> 0:00:30.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm Kate Winkler Dawson, a nonfiction author and journalism professor

0:00:30.080 --> 0:00:32.800
<v Speaker 1>in Austin, Texas. I'm also the co host of the

0:00:32.840 --> 0:00:36.680
<v Speaker 1>podcast Buried Bones on Exactly Right, and throughout my career,

0:00:36.960 --> 0:00:40.680
<v Speaker 1>research for my many audio and book projects has taken

0:00:40.760 --> 0:00:44.000
<v Speaker 1>me around the world. On Wicked Words, I sit down

0:00:44.040 --> 0:00:48.720
<v Speaker 1>with the people I've met along the way, amazing writers, journalists, filmmakers,

0:00:48.760 --> 0:00:53.200
<v Speaker 1>and podcasters who have investigated and reported on notorious true

0:00:53.200 --> 0:00:57.000
<v Speaker 1>crime cases. This is about the choices writers make, both

0:00:57.040 --> 0:01:00.040
<v Speaker 1>good and bad, and it's a deep dive into the

0:01:00.120 --> 0:01:05.520
<v Speaker 1>unpublished details behind their stories. This week on Wicked Words,

0:01:05.600 --> 0:01:09.440
<v Speaker 1>we're traveling to eighteen fifty six, Ireland for a locked

0:01:09.560 --> 0:01:13.679
<v Speaker 1>door mystery. A cashier for a Dublin railway station is

0:01:13.800 --> 0:01:17.720
<v Speaker 1>found dead, savagely beaten. Nothing appears to be stolen. Can

0:01:17.760 --> 0:01:22.080
<v Speaker 1>an experienced detective crack this case. Author Thomas Morris tells

0:01:22.160 --> 0:01:25.920
<v Speaker 1>us the story in his new book The Dublin Railway Murder.

0:01:26.200 --> 0:01:33.640
<v Speaker 1>The sensational true story of a Victorian murder mystery. Tell

0:01:33.640 --> 0:01:36.160
<v Speaker 1>me how you came to write this book. Where did

0:01:36.160 --> 0:01:37.480
<v Speaker 1>you discover this story?

0:01:38.040 --> 0:01:40.480
<v Speaker 2>Well, I came across this story in a slightly unusual

0:01:40.600 --> 0:01:44.319
<v Speaker 2>sideways fashion, which is that before I wrote this book,

0:01:44.360 --> 0:01:46.360
<v Speaker 2>I really had no intention of writing a true crime

0:01:46.400 --> 0:01:48.880
<v Speaker 2>book at all. But what I was writing about a

0:01:48.920 --> 0:01:51.400
<v Speaker 2>lot was the history of medicine. My first book was

0:01:51.720 --> 0:01:54.840
<v Speaker 2>History of Cardiac Surgery, and after that I wrote a

0:01:55.560 --> 0:01:58.000
<v Speaker 2>slightly more kind of frivolous book, which was based on

0:01:58.040 --> 0:02:00.400
<v Speaker 2>the lots of stories I'd come across during two or

0:02:00.400 --> 0:02:04.880
<v Speaker 2>three years research. And what I found was that when

0:02:05.120 --> 0:02:08.440
<v Speaker 2>I looked through medical journals for material I was using

0:02:08.520 --> 0:02:13.000
<v Speaker 2>for the heart surgery book, there were these strange little stories,

0:02:13.120 --> 0:02:17.280
<v Speaker 2>case studies, case histories of patients who got into strange

0:02:17.320 --> 0:02:20.600
<v Speaker 2>difficulties or been treated in unusual ways. And I collected

0:02:20.600 --> 0:02:22.280
<v Speaker 2>a lot of this material and it formed the basis

0:02:22.320 --> 0:02:25.480
<v Speaker 2>of my second book. So for quite a long period,

0:02:25.600 --> 0:02:30.280
<v Speaker 2>I was constantly looking into old medical journals between about

0:02:30.360 --> 0:02:33.400
<v Speaker 2>the dates of about sort of seventeen fifty nineteen hundred,

0:02:33.480 --> 0:02:36.480
<v Speaker 2>that sort of era, mainly the nineteenth century, and a

0:02:36.520 --> 0:02:38.880
<v Speaker 2>lot of this stuff I would just sort of squirrel

0:02:38.919 --> 0:02:41.480
<v Speaker 2>away for future use, and sometimes I thought it might

0:02:41.520 --> 0:02:43.680
<v Speaker 2>turn into a slightly bigger project. And one of the

0:02:43.680 --> 0:02:46.920
<v Speaker 2>stories I came across and didn't actually return to for

0:02:46.919 --> 0:02:51.520
<v Speaker 2>a good two years was a single page report in

0:02:51.600 --> 0:02:54.480
<v Speaker 2>an English medical journal about a court case that was

0:02:54.520 --> 0:02:57.600
<v Speaker 2>then going on in Ireland. It was a court report

0:02:57.639 --> 0:02:59.880
<v Speaker 2>which was only included in a medical journal because there

0:02:59.880 --> 0:03:03.800
<v Speaker 2>were some medical evidence that was submitted. It wasn't actually

0:03:03.919 --> 0:03:07.280
<v Speaker 2>very interesting as medical evidence goes, but when I read

0:03:07.280 --> 0:03:10.200
<v Speaker 2>the page, I thought, actually, this sounded quite an interesting story.

0:03:10.560 --> 0:03:12.560
<v Speaker 2>And the bit of it in particular that I was

0:03:12.600 --> 0:03:15.920
<v Speaker 2>interested in was the fact that this court report was

0:03:16.280 --> 0:03:19.880
<v Speaker 2>a murder trial. It was the murder of a clerk

0:03:20.120 --> 0:03:23.760
<v Speaker 2>in an Irish railway station in Dublin in eighteen fifty six,

0:03:24.400 --> 0:03:28.079
<v Speaker 2>and that day's evidence had discussed the ways in which

0:03:28.120 --> 0:03:30.440
<v Speaker 2>the murderer might have got in and out of the room,

0:03:30.480 --> 0:03:33.519
<v Speaker 2>whether the victim was killed, And just reading that one

0:03:33.600 --> 0:03:36.200
<v Speaker 2>paragraph about this discussion of how the murderer might have

0:03:36.240 --> 0:03:39.080
<v Speaker 2>got in and out of the room reminded me of

0:03:39.600 --> 0:03:42.800
<v Speaker 2>a Golden age detective story, one of those nineteen thirties

0:03:42.840 --> 0:03:46.560
<v Speaker 2>Agatha Christie's stories. One of her Great Contemporaries. I didn't

0:03:46.560 --> 0:03:48.960
<v Speaker 2>really think very much more of it until a couple

0:03:48.960 --> 0:03:51.560
<v Speaker 2>of years later when I found that the whole trial

0:03:51.680 --> 0:03:55.240
<v Speaker 2>had been transcribed, And when I read that, I found

0:03:55.280 --> 0:03:58.080
<v Speaker 2>that actually it was not just as good as I

0:03:58.160 --> 0:04:00.800
<v Speaker 2>had thought it might be, but actually quite a lot better.

0:04:01.360 --> 0:04:05.240
<v Speaker 2>It was a really fantastic murder mystery with a genuine

0:04:05.280 --> 0:04:08.160
<v Speaker 2>mystery at its heart, also elements of the sort of

0:04:08.160 --> 0:04:11.480
<v Speaker 2>locked room mystery going on. In particular, the one feature

0:04:11.480 --> 0:04:13.120
<v Speaker 2>I'd kind of single out as the reason I was

0:04:13.120 --> 0:04:15.920
<v Speaker 2>interested in writing about it as a non fiction book

0:04:16.200 --> 0:04:18.359
<v Speaker 2>was that it had all those elements that make detective

0:04:18.400 --> 0:04:21.400
<v Speaker 2>fiction of the early twentieth century so enjoyable, which is

0:04:21.440 --> 0:04:25.960
<v Speaker 2>to say, a distinctive setting, a cast of characters which

0:04:26.000 --> 0:04:28.880
<v Speaker 2>includes a relatively limited number of suspects that you can

0:04:28.960 --> 0:04:33.040
<v Speaker 2>choose between, and then a distinctive detective at the heart

0:04:33.080 --> 0:04:35.880
<v Speaker 2>of it all, even with a distinctive name, Augustus Guy.

0:04:36.160 --> 0:04:38.839
<v Speaker 2>So when I went back to it and read the

0:04:38.880 --> 0:04:41.560
<v Speaker 2>transcript of this trial, I thought, this has to be

0:04:41.600 --> 0:04:42.000
<v Speaker 2>a book.

0:04:42.279 --> 0:04:45.280
<v Speaker 1>And you have some wacky science that goes along with

0:04:45.360 --> 0:04:48.520
<v Speaker 1>this too, that was real, and you know, people continue

0:04:48.520 --> 0:04:50.120
<v Speaker 1>to believe for a long time, and we'll talk about

0:04:50.120 --> 0:04:53.320
<v Speaker 1>phrenology in a little bit. But you have some elements

0:04:53.400 --> 0:04:58.000
<v Speaker 1>here that I think for me almost represent contemporary, you know,

0:04:58.080 --> 0:05:00.640
<v Speaker 1>issues that we talk about in true crime today, including

0:05:00.680 --> 0:05:05.000
<v Speaker 1>scientific racism, which is what phrenology really kind of evolved into,

0:05:05.440 --> 0:05:09.920
<v Speaker 1>predicting somebody's behavior in their character based on some physical attributes.

0:05:10.279 --> 0:05:13.039
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I would sort of divide up this story into

0:05:13.440 --> 0:05:16.120
<v Speaker 2>three separate not chapters, but there are sort of three

0:05:16.360 --> 0:05:19.240
<v Speaker 2>almost acts to this story. There is the murder and

0:05:19.279 --> 0:05:22.080
<v Speaker 2>the investigation that followed it, which lasted many months. It

0:05:22.120 --> 0:05:24.200
<v Speaker 2>was not a crime that was easily solved at all.

0:05:24.400 --> 0:05:27.360
<v Speaker 2>And then there is the high drama of the court trial.

0:05:27.600 --> 0:05:29.560
<v Speaker 2>It was a four day trial, which at that time

0:05:29.680 --> 0:05:32.000
<v Speaker 2>was a very long court proceedings. They like to get

0:05:32.040 --> 0:05:34.479
<v Speaker 2>them done and dusted in a day if they could.

0:05:35.120 --> 0:05:38.120
<v Speaker 2>After the trial, there's this very extraordinary you could call

0:05:38.160 --> 0:05:42.560
<v Speaker 2>it a coder. There's like this strange afterlife of the

0:05:42.600 --> 0:05:45.880
<v Speaker 2>stories not done and dusted, and that involves at this

0:05:45.960 --> 0:05:50.120
<v Speaker 2>point this extraordinary character phrenologist, as you say, as somebody

0:05:50.160 --> 0:05:54.040
<v Speaker 2>who studied the shapes of people's skulls and based an

0:05:54.240 --> 0:05:57.760
<v Speaker 2>entire theory on the shape of skulls. He wanted to

0:05:57.839 --> 0:06:01.000
<v Speaker 2>prove that you could distinguish between a murge and a

0:06:01.080 --> 0:06:04.560
<v Speaker 2>non murderer based on the shape of somebody's skull. He

0:06:04.720 --> 0:06:07.560
<v Speaker 2>is a very extraordinary character who comes in and then

0:06:07.560 --> 0:06:09.760
<v Speaker 2>we have this rather unexpected I mean to me, it's

0:06:09.880 --> 0:06:12.000
<v Speaker 2>it's almost the it's the part of the story that

0:06:12.080 --> 0:06:15.840
<v Speaker 2>makes this such a distinctive tale that this phrenologist, a

0:06:15.839 --> 0:06:19.520
<v Speaker 2>man based in Liverpool called called Frederick Bridges, comes in

0:06:19.760 --> 0:06:23.040
<v Speaker 2>and then studies the skull or the person who has

0:06:23.080 --> 0:06:25.200
<v Speaker 2>turned out to be the chief suspect for the murder.

0:06:28.480 --> 0:06:30.440
<v Speaker 1>One of the things that I think, obviously is a

0:06:30.440 --> 0:06:33.040
<v Speaker 1>contemporary theme that you've brought up in here too, is

0:06:33.520 --> 0:06:37.640
<v Speaker 1>the idea of junk science, and that falls into you know, phrenology.

0:06:38.120 --> 0:06:40.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, we can laugh at certain things, dogs sniffing

0:06:40.960 --> 0:06:43.440
<v Speaker 1>a suspect and you know, pointing them out and then

0:06:43.480 --> 0:06:46.800
<v Speaker 1>they end up in jail. Which has happened for that

0:06:46.800 --> 0:06:50.200
<v Speaker 1>that's the only evidence, And you know, there's certainly some

0:06:50.520 --> 0:06:54.560
<v Speaker 1>very questionable techniques out there, like I'll think about in US.

0:06:54.640 --> 0:06:56.599
<v Speaker 1>I'll say, there's no way anybody is going to believe

0:06:56.640 --> 0:06:58.880
<v Speaker 1>that this is the only piece of evidence needed to

0:06:58.920 --> 0:07:02.159
<v Speaker 1>convict someone. Into people believe them. And that's what was

0:07:02.200 --> 0:07:04.440
<v Speaker 1>sort of happening, you know, in this case and in

0:07:04.520 --> 0:07:09.159
<v Speaker 1>this time period before phrenology was discredited, was you could

0:07:09.200 --> 0:07:12.760
<v Speaker 1>have somebody feel you know, the skull of someone and

0:07:12.800 --> 0:07:15.720
<v Speaker 1>declare whether they had a criminal mind or not, like

0:07:15.760 --> 0:07:17.840
<v Speaker 1>you had said. Also, you know, sort of like an

0:07:17.880 --> 0:07:20.360
<v Speaker 1>eighteen fifty six minority report.

0:07:20.800 --> 0:07:24.000
<v Speaker 2>Yes. One of the things about this story this era,

0:07:24.080 --> 0:07:26.120
<v Speaker 2>which I think is rather interesting from the point of

0:07:26.200 --> 0:07:28.640
<v Speaker 2>view of looking into a crime and investigating a crime,

0:07:28.720 --> 0:07:32.800
<v Speaker 2>is it really stands at the junction between two eras.

0:07:33.080 --> 0:07:35.520
<v Speaker 2>On the one hand, it sounds very much like a

0:07:35.520 --> 0:07:39.400
<v Speaker 2>police procedural from say London today, like an English or

0:07:39.600 --> 0:07:44.000
<v Speaker 2>Scottish police story today. That there was a detective force

0:07:44.160 --> 0:07:46.840
<v Speaker 2>in Dublin in eighteen fifty six. It was modeled on

0:07:47.080 --> 0:07:49.800
<v Speaker 2>the slightly older detective force that had been set up

0:07:50.000 --> 0:07:54.000
<v Speaker 2>in London, the Metropolitan Police. The Metro Police was found

0:07:54.080 --> 0:07:56.760
<v Speaker 2>in the eighteen twenties and their detectives came along about

0:07:56.800 --> 0:08:01.720
<v Speaker 2>ten years after that. Dublin institute its detective force a

0:08:01.720 --> 0:08:05.480
<v Speaker 2>little later, but it was modeled explicitly on the London

0:08:05.560 --> 0:08:08.880
<v Speaker 2>force when Dublin gained its first detective force. So you

0:08:09.000 --> 0:08:11.000
<v Speaker 2>have the structure of the police and the way they

0:08:11.000 --> 0:08:13.800
<v Speaker 2>operate is superficially very similar to the way that a

0:08:13.840 --> 0:08:17.720
<v Speaker 2>police investigation might even take place today. The ranks of

0:08:17.760 --> 0:08:19.640
<v Speaker 2>the officers are the same, the way they go about

0:08:19.640 --> 0:08:22.040
<v Speaker 2>it is sort of superficially similar, but at the same

0:08:22.080 --> 0:08:24.880
<v Speaker 2>time their investigation techniques are so primitive.

0:08:25.560 --> 0:08:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Let's get to the main part of the story before

0:08:28.160 --> 0:08:31.720
<v Speaker 1>we dive too much into phrenology and the way that

0:08:32.160 --> 0:08:34.440
<v Speaker 1>you know the police force was structured. Where does it

0:08:34.520 --> 0:08:37.240
<v Speaker 1>make sense to you to start? Is it with the

0:08:37.320 --> 0:08:40.440
<v Speaker 1>victim George Little, or is it the scene on when

0:08:40.440 --> 0:08:41.239
<v Speaker 1>he's discovered.

0:08:41.600 --> 0:08:44.120
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I think it is the victim George Little. He

0:08:44.440 --> 0:08:48.920
<v Speaker 2>was a man in his early forties who worked as

0:08:48.920 --> 0:08:53.600
<v Speaker 2>a clerk in the railway station in Dublin, the Midland's

0:08:53.600 --> 0:08:57.599
<v Speaker 2>Great Western Railway Company's terminus at Broadstone. His background was

0:08:57.600 --> 0:09:00.760
<v Speaker 2>slightly unfortunate in that he was one of four children

0:09:00.920 --> 0:09:04.840
<v Speaker 2>of a prosperous solicitor in middle class Dublin, and his

0:09:04.880 --> 0:09:08.040
<v Speaker 2>father had died when he was fifteen, very suddenly and unexpectedly,

0:09:08.600 --> 0:09:12.760
<v Speaker 2>leaving his mother. George Little's mother a widow with four

0:09:12.840 --> 0:09:15.160
<v Speaker 2>children to support, and they had very little money. They

0:09:15.240 --> 0:09:17.760
<v Speaker 2>ended up living in I would say some poverty, although

0:09:17.760 --> 0:09:20.760
<v Speaker 2>in quite a grand house in the southern suburbs of Dublin.

0:09:20.960 --> 0:09:23.520
<v Speaker 2>George Little ended up as the bread winner for the

0:09:23.640 --> 0:09:27.760
<v Speaker 2>entire household, for his mother, for his grandmother who lived

0:09:27.760 --> 0:09:31.560
<v Speaker 2>with them, and a widowed sister, and for one of

0:09:31.600 --> 0:09:33.760
<v Speaker 2>his siblings, a sister who lived with him. So there

0:09:33.760 --> 0:09:35.560
<v Speaker 2>are four people living in this house. He's the only

0:09:35.600 --> 0:09:39.240
<v Speaker 2>person earning a wage. And he was working as the

0:09:39.320 --> 0:09:43.520
<v Speaker 2>chief cashier in the station. One evening in November eighteen

0:09:43.600 --> 0:09:46.400
<v Speaker 2>fifty six, he told his sister that he was going

0:09:46.440 --> 0:09:48.679
<v Speaker 2>to be working a little late. There was a lot

0:09:48.720 --> 0:09:52.160
<v Speaker 2>of work to do, and his job consisted essentially of

0:09:52.280 --> 0:09:54.280
<v Speaker 2>taking all the cash that was taken on the entire

0:09:54.360 --> 0:09:57.439
<v Speaker 2>railway line from Dublin to the West coast of Ireland.

0:09:58.080 --> 0:10:01.080
<v Speaker 2>And when all the money came, all the money from

0:10:01.080 --> 0:10:03.480
<v Speaker 2>the entire length of the line, every ticket office came

0:10:03.520 --> 0:10:05.640
<v Speaker 2>to Dublin and it was his job to count it up,

0:10:05.960 --> 0:10:09.120
<v Speaker 2>account it and then send all the returns into the

0:10:09.160 --> 0:10:13.280
<v Speaker 2>accounting department of the railway company. And on this Thursday

0:10:13.320 --> 0:10:15.360
<v Speaker 2>evening there was a lot of money to be counted.

0:10:15.400 --> 0:10:17.760
<v Speaker 2>He had to stay late to his family surprise. He

0:10:17.760 --> 0:10:20.400
<v Speaker 2>didn't return home that night, and his sister went into

0:10:20.440 --> 0:10:22.400
<v Speaker 2>the station the following morning to find out what had

0:10:22.440 --> 0:10:25.719
<v Speaker 2>happened to him, and nobody had realized that he had

0:10:25.720 --> 0:10:27.720
<v Speaker 2>not left his office that night, and they found his

0:10:27.800 --> 0:10:30.679
<v Speaker 2>office locked and shut, and when they broke down the door,

0:10:31.080 --> 0:10:33.840
<v Speaker 2>there was this scene of absolute carnage within. He had

0:10:33.880 --> 0:10:38.040
<v Speaker 2>been bludgeoned to death with some heavy object, but his

0:10:38.120 --> 0:10:41.199
<v Speaker 2>throat had also been cut, so it was a fairly

0:10:41.400 --> 0:10:44.720
<v Speaker 2>terrifying scene, a huge pool of blood, and then this

0:10:44.880 --> 0:10:48.600
<v Speaker 2>really very disfigured body lying underneath his desk. I think

0:10:48.600 --> 0:10:52.360
<v Speaker 2>it's worth saying this in Dublin, which strangely had not

0:10:52.440 --> 0:10:55.800
<v Speaker 2>experienced any murder in probably over a decade.

0:10:55.920 --> 0:10:56.120
<v Speaker 1>Wow.

0:10:56.360 --> 0:11:00.000
<v Speaker 2>And we tend to think of Victorian cities, particularly in Britain,

0:11:00.280 --> 0:11:04.880
<v Speaker 2>has been terribly dangerous places, places where footpads and thieves

0:11:04.920 --> 0:11:07.880
<v Speaker 2>and robbers thought nothing of slitting your throat to take

0:11:07.880 --> 0:11:11.720
<v Speaker 2>your wallet. But in fact Dublin was perhaps the best

0:11:11.720 --> 0:11:14.079
<v Speaker 2>police city on the planet at this point. It had

0:11:14.080 --> 0:11:17.400
<v Speaker 2>an enormous police force and it was very very safe.

0:11:17.440 --> 0:11:21.679
<v Speaker 2>And in fact, the previous documented murder within the city

0:11:21.679 --> 0:11:23.959
<v Speaker 2>of Dublin that I could find any evidence about was

0:11:24.000 --> 0:11:28.880
<v Speaker 2>eighteen forty two. That's fourteen years without a single documented homicide,

0:11:28.920 --> 0:11:30.960
<v Speaker 2>which I think is just an extraordinary statistic.

0:11:31.559 --> 0:11:34.880
<v Speaker 1>So when he is counting this money, how much money

0:11:34.920 --> 0:11:38.439
<v Speaker 1>are we talking about in Dublin eighteen fifty six and

0:11:38.760 --> 0:11:40.840
<v Speaker 1>you know what would that be the equivalent of today?

0:11:40.880 --> 0:11:43.160
<v Speaker 1>Is it hundreds of thousands of dollars or less?

0:11:43.800 --> 0:11:45.760
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think I mean, off the top of my head,

0:11:45.800 --> 0:11:48.640
<v Speaker 2>the amount of money that he had in his office

0:11:48.640 --> 0:11:50.720
<v Speaker 2>that night was something of the order of one and

0:11:50.760 --> 0:11:54.200
<v Speaker 2>a half thousand pounds, which is an absolutely enormous amount

0:11:54.200 --> 0:11:57.000
<v Speaker 2>of money. I mean, it's multiples of what the average

0:11:57.000 --> 0:11:59.840
<v Speaker 2>worker in Dublin would be earning per year at that date.

0:12:00.760 --> 0:12:04.400
<v Speaker 2>It was an unusually large sum of money, even for

0:12:04.559 --> 0:12:07.520
<v Speaker 2>a railway company that was at that point very successful.

0:12:07.960 --> 0:12:10.280
<v Speaker 2>And the reason for that is twofold one is that

0:12:10.360 --> 0:12:13.280
<v Speaker 2>the money that came through his office wasn't just every

0:12:13.400 --> 0:12:17.400
<v Speaker 2>fare that was paid on the entire railway line. It

0:12:17.480 --> 0:12:20.880
<v Speaker 2>was also the Canal Company, which was also owned by

0:12:20.920 --> 0:12:24.160
<v Speaker 2>the railway company. Before the railways came along, the main

0:12:24.960 --> 0:12:28.840
<v Speaker 2>route of communication and of carrying large heavy loads from

0:12:28.840 --> 0:12:31.760
<v Speaker 2>the west coast of Ireland to Dublin was the canal network.

0:12:31.960 --> 0:12:34.319
<v Speaker 2>Every penny that was spent on the canals all the

0:12:34.400 --> 0:12:37.440
<v Speaker 2>railway ended up in George Little's office. But also that

0:12:37.520 --> 0:12:39.680
<v Speaker 2>particular week there had been a big fair at a

0:12:39.679 --> 0:12:42.200
<v Speaker 2>place called Mullinger, which is in the midlands of Ireland.

0:12:43.080 --> 0:12:45.680
<v Speaker 2>It was the main place where horses were traded at

0:12:45.720 --> 0:12:48.600
<v Speaker 2>that point in Ireland and even breeders and owners used

0:12:48.600 --> 0:12:51.760
<v Speaker 2>to come from England to buy and sell their horses

0:12:52.040 --> 0:12:54.319
<v Speaker 2>at Mullinger. So there was a huge amount of extra

0:12:54.360 --> 0:12:57.000
<v Speaker 2>footfall on the railways. Even animals, by the way, went

0:12:57.040 --> 0:12:59.720
<v Speaker 2>on this railway, so cows and horses would also have

0:12:59.760 --> 0:13:03.840
<v Speaker 2>been loaded as freight. So there was a huge amount

0:13:04.040 --> 0:13:06.680
<v Speaker 2>of traffic going up and down the railway line that week,

0:13:06.720 --> 0:13:08.480
<v Speaker 2>and as a result, he had this huge sum of

0:13:08.520 --> 0:13:10.640
<v Speaker 2>money on his desk in front of him at the

0:13:10.640 --> 0:13:11.559
<v Speaker 2>moment that he was killed.

0:13:11.800 --> 0:13:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Is it determined pretty quickly whether or not these weapons

0:13:15.000 --> 0:13:17.120
<v Speaker 1>there's a heavy object you said that was used to

0:13:17.160 --> 0:13:21.400
<v Speaker 1>beat him viciously, and then a razor or something used

0:13:21.400 --> 0:13:23.840
<v Speaker 1>to cut his throat. Were those things that were present

0:13:24.120 --> 0:13:26.920
<v Speaker 1>in his office. I know that eventually we're going to

0:13:26.920 --> 0:13:28.319
<v Speaker 1>get to where they're found.

0:13:28.840 --> 0:13:31.040
<v Speaker 2>One of the things that's quite interesting about this case,

0:13:31.160 --> 0:13:35.240
<v Speaker 2>comparing it with how murder investigations go today, is there

0:13:35.320 --> 0:13:38.839
<v Speaker 2>was very little heed paid to the importance of the

0:13:39.000 --> 0:13:41.480
<v Speaker 2>murder scene, the crime scene. There's no sense that you've

0:13:41.480 --> 0:13:43.880
<v Speaker 2>got to preserve evidence, that you've got to look for traces,

0:13:44.000 --> 0:13:46.640
<v Speaker 2>or that you've got to look for particular objects there.

0:13:47.320 --> 0:13:50.400
<v Speaker 2>So by the time the police actually a summoned to

0:13:50.440 --> 0:13:53.560
<v Speaker 2>investigate the scene, literally dozens of people have been even

0:13:53.600 --> 0:13:55.560
<v Speaker 2>people just wanting to go into the room to have

0:13:55.600 --> 0:13:57.160
<v Speaker 2>a look and see what it was like, what was

0:13:57.200 --> 0:14:00.640
<v Speaker 2>going on. People were taking souvenirs from the room even

0:14:00.679 --> 0:14:02.640
<v Speaker 2>before the police had had the chance to examine it.

0:14:03.040 --> 0:14:06.480
<v Speaker 2>So they didn't have a pristine scene by any means.

0:14:06.960 --> 0:14:11.920
<v Speaker 2>But objects they found there really probably immediately they could

0:14:11.920 --> 0:14:14.040
<v Speaker 2>see that there was no murder weapon on the scene.

0:14:14.040 --> 0:14:16.440
<v Speaker 2>They found a small pen knife which had evidently been

0:14:16.520 --> 0:14:19.720
<v Speaker 2>used as a sort of office work, maybe for sort

0:14:19.720 --> 0:14:22.600
<v Speaker 2>of cutting the strings on bundles of papers, that sort

0:14:22.600 --> 0:14:25.720
<v Speaker 2>of thing. There was nothing sharp enough to have caused

0:14:25.880 --> 0:14:28.280
<v Speaker 2>a wound that's described by one of the doctors who

0:14:28.280 --> 0:14:32.160
<v Speaker 2>examined the body as having almost entirely severed his neck.

0:14:32.600 --> 0:14:35.000
<v Speaker 2>The cuts of this blade had gone so deep that

0:14:35.080 --> 0:14:37.280
<v Speaker 2>he had almost exposed the spine from the front of

0:14:37.320 --> 0:14:40.760
<v Speaker 2>the neck. It was a really very extreme injury, and

0:14:40.800 --> 0:14:45.440
<v Speaker 2>similarly the skull had been very badly fractured in several places,

0:14:45.480 --> 0:14:48.480
<v Speaker 2>so it was of heavy object. There was absolutely nothing

0:14:48.520 --> 0:14:52.240
<v Speaker 2>suitable in the room for causing such severe injuries. There

0:14:52.320 --> 0:14:56.160
<v Speaker 2>was brief discussion at the inquest, which took place forty

0:14:56.160 --> 0:14:58.640
<v Speaker 2>eight hours later in the same building. There was brief

0:14:58.680 --> 0:15:01.120
<v Speaker 2>discussion of whether a poke which had been found next

0:15:01.120 --> 0:15:03.280
<v Speaker 2>to the fire might have been involved, but it was

0:15:03.320 --> 0:15:06.960
<v Speaker 2>a sort of slim, slender, cast iron object. There was

0:15:06.960 --> 0:15:09.880
<v Speaker 2>absolutely no way it could have caused those injuries. So

0:15:10.000 --> 0:15:13.080
<v Speaker 2>pretty quickly the police understood that they were also looking

0:15:13.080 --> 0:15:15.560
<v Speaker 2>for murder weapons as well as the murderer himself.

0:15:18.640 --> 0:15:20.880
<v Speaker 1>The door locked on the inside. These are not the

0:15:20.960 --> 0:15:24.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of locks where we can do the little thumb

0:15:24.000 --> 0:15:25.920
<v Speaker 1>lock where you can lock it now on the inside

0:15:25.920 --> 0:15:27.840
<v Speaker 1>and shut the door and it'll be locked to anybody

0:15:27.880 --> 0:15:29.800
<v Speaker 1>on the outside. Did somebody have to have a key

0:15:29.880 --> 0:15:30.760
<v Speaker 1>to be able to do this?

0:15:31.120 --> 0:15:33.240
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think it's worth describing the room where his

0:15:33.280 --> 0:15:35.440
<v Speaker 2>body was found first of all, so he was in

0:15:35.480 --> 0:15:37.880
<v Speaker 2>the cashier's office, which was on the first floor of

0:15:37.880 --> 0:15:40.400
<v Speaker 2>the building. And again it's worth saying that one of

0:15:40.480 --> 0:15:43.280
<v Speaker 2>the reasons I've found this quite an attractive story is

0:15:43.320 --> 0:15:46.240
<v Speaker 2>that the setting was not just a railway station, but

0:15:46.280 --> 0:15:50.080
<v Speaker 2>a railway station where there was a permanent residential staff.

0:15:50.280 --> 0:15:53.200
<v Speaker 2>So there is the station house where several people lived.

0:15:53.200 --> 0:15:56.640
<v Speaker 2>The station master lived in an apartment in the basement

0:15:56.680 --> 0:15:58.960
<v Speaker 2>with his family. There are a couple of other families

0:15:59.000 --> 0:16:01.320
<v Speaker 2>that lived there full time. There were always people in residence,

0:16:01.600 --> 0:16:03.680
<v Speaker 2>and George Little's office was on the first floor of

0:16:03.680 --> 0:16:06.320
<v Speaker 2>this building. There was a maid who came and went,

0:16:06.440 --> 0:16:08.840
<v Speaker 2>who would make the fire and then clean the rooms

0:16:08.880 --> 0:16:12.320
<v Speaker 2>after everybody had left, And there was more than one

0:16:12.360 --> 0:16:14.600
<v Speaker 2>way in and out of his room, the door which

0:16:14.640 --> 0:16:16.720
<v Speaker 2>was lockable, and then there are a couple of windows,

0:16:16.760 --> 0:16:19.560
<v Speaker 2>one of which overlooked the great roof that went over

0:16:19.600 --> 0:16:23.200
<v Speaker 2>the train shed itself. And when his body was found,

0:16:23.360 --> 0:16:26.080
<v Speaker 2>the door was locked. Initially it was thought that it

0:16:26.120 --> 0:16:28.360
<v Speaker 2>had been locked from the inside. That turned out not

0:16:28.400 --> 0:16:30.240
<v Speaker 2>to have been the case in fact. And then there

0:16:30.320 --> 0:16:33.000
<v Speaker 2>was also the window, And actually both of these routes

0:16:33.200 --> 0:16:37.640
<v Speaker 2>remained plausible entry and exit routes for the mergerer for

0:16:37.920 --> 0:16:41.520
<v Speaker 2>months afterwards. In fact, what was probably the cases they

0:16:41.600 --> 0:16:44.040
<v Speaker 2>established quite quickly was that the mergerer had probably gone

0:16:44.080 --> 0:16:46.520
<v Speaker 2>in through the door and exited through the window, and

0:16:46.560 --> 0:16:49.320
<v Speaker 2>there was a route that they established. It was possible

0:16:49.400 --> 0:16:52.440
<v Speaker 2>to get out of the window and then walk along

0:16:52.720 --> 0:16:56.080
<v Speaker 2>the roof and then down a ladder into one of

0:16:56.120 --> 0:17:00.000
<v Speaker 2>the restaurants one of the laboratories on the station platform.

0:17:00.320 --> 0:17:03.080
<v Speaker 2>So there was a sort of multiplicity of options that

0:17:03.440 --> 0:17:04.920
<v Speaker 2>possibilities that were open.

0:17:05.200 --> 0:17:08.760
<v Speaker 1>Could this have been a crime of opportunity in that

0:17:08.880 --> 0:17:12.800
<v Speaker 1>someone saw his light on late one night and you

0:17:12.800 --> 0:17:15.840
<v Speaker 1>could see that visibly from wherever the public could access it.

0:17:16.520 --> 0:17:18.840
<v Speaker 1>Or was this a situation where somebody would have had

0:17:18.840 --> 0:17:21.640
<v Speaker 1>to know his schedule or was sort of observing him

0:17:22.240 --> 0:17:23.919
<v Speaker 1>knowing he was going to be alone and that this

0:17:23.960 --> 0:17:25.720
<v Speaker 1>would be a safe thing to do well.

0:17:25.760 --> 0:17:28.600
<v Speaker 2>The honest answer is yes to both. But one of

0:17:28.640 --> 0:17:31.720
<v Speaker 2>the things the police really struggled with was to understand

0:17:31.960 --> 0:17:35.000
<v Speaker 2>the circumstances. There were reasons for thinking that it had

0:17:35.000 --> 0:17:38.000
<v Speaker 2>to be somebody who knew the station premises well, because

0:17:38.480 --> 0:17:41.760
<v Speaker 2>the station house itself was locked up after one of

0:17:41.800 --> 0:17:44.840
<v Speaker 2>the late trains had left in the early evening, and

0:17:44.880 --> 0:17:47.359
<v Speaker 2>at that point it was possible for a member of

0:17:47.440 --> 0:17:49.680
<v Speaker 2>the public to walk into the station house and find

0:17:49.680 --> 0:17:52.360
<v Speaker 2>his office, but you would have to know a quite

0:17:52.440 --> 0:17:55.720
<v Speaker 2>complicated route, which involved going downstairs to the basement and

0:17:55.760 --> 0:17:58.200
<v Speaker 2>then up a backset of stairs in order to get

0:17:58.200 --> 0:18:00.480
<v Speaker 2>to the office. At the same time, there was also

0:18:00.520 --> 0:18:04.040
<v Speaker 2>the possibility that it had been a crime of opportunity,

0:18:04.320 --> 0:18:08.640
<v Speaker 2>because the building was fundamentally open to anybody any member

0:18:08.640 --> 0:18:11.399
<v Speaker 2>of the public during the day, and there were numerous

0:18:11.480 --> 0:18:15.000
<v Speaker 2>hiding places where somebody could have hidden. The investigation, which

0:18:15.080 --> 0:18:18.600
<v Speaker 2>lasted weeks and then stretched out into months, lasted so

0:18:18.680 --> 0:18:22.440
<v Speaker 2>long partly because there were so many different possibilities, both

0:18:22.480 --> 0:18:25.080
<v Speaker 2>of the nature of the crime but also who had

0:18:25.080 --> 0:18:25.720
<v Speaker 2>committed it.

0:18:26.200 --> 0:18:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Let's I guess start with what they think the motive is.

0:18:29.640 --> 0:18:33.080
<v Speaker 1>They see this man badly beaten. Is this what now?

0:18:33.119 --> 0:18:35.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if this is a UK term also,

0:18:35.119 --> 0:18:37.680
<v Speaker 1>but in America this would be called like an overkill,

0:18:37.920 --> 0:18:42.960
<v Speaker 1>like somebody really has beaten this person far more than

0:18:43.480 --> 0:18:47.600
<v Speaker 1>needed to just disable someone or quickly kill someone and

0:18:47.840 --> 0:18:51.119
<v Speaker 1>take money or take whatever they wanted and then leave.

0:18:51.359 --> 0:18:52.240
<v Speaker 1>This seemed personal.

0:18:52.760 --> 0:18:55.879
<v Speaker 2>There was a ferocity to the nature of the attack

0:18:56.000 --> 0:19:00.200
<v Speaker 2>that really took people's breath away. That's worth saying. It's

0:19:00.240 --> 0:19:03.480
<v Speaker 2>one of the reasons that it absolutely gripped Dublin. When

0:19:03.520 --> 0:19:07.400
<v Speaker 2>this was first announced in the papers within forty eight

0:19:07.440 --> 0:19:10.640
<v Speaker 2>hours of his death, nobody could remember something quite as

0:19:10.640 --> 0:19:13.399
<v Speaker 2>appallingly violent as this, and in fact it led the

0:19:13.400 --> 0:19:15.560
<v Speaker 2>police to think at first that there might have been

0:19:15.640 --> 0:19:18.840
<v Speaker 2>some sort of motive like revenge involved, But when they

0:19:18.840 --> 0:19:21.879
<v Speaker 2>looked into his family background, they found that actually he

0:19:21.960 --> 0:19:25.040
<v Speaker 2>was an extremely quiet and reserved man. He was a

0:19:25.080 --> 0:19:30.640
<v Speaker 2>member of a Christian sect, the Plymouth Brethren, was absolutely pacifist,

0:19:31.359 --> 0:19:33.800
<v Speaker 2>did not believe in holding grudges. He was honest to

0:19:33.880 --> 0:19:36.920
<v Speaker 2>a fault. He had few close friends, but he was

0:19:37.040 --> 0:19:39.800
<v Speaker 2>universally well liked. There was no grounds for thinking that

0:19:39.920 --> 0:19:43.000
<v Speaker 2>this could have been a sort of personal motive, so

0:19:43.320 --> 0:19:46.480
<v Speaker 2>that left the idea that it was either robbery or

0:19:46.560 --> 0:19:50.239
<v Speaker 2>just a random attack. And at first it seemed that

0:19:50.840 --> 0:19:53.959
<v Speaker 2>nothing had been taken, because when they found his body

0:19:54.440 --> 0:19:58.960
<v Speaker 2>they discovered that his table his desk was piled high

0:19:59.040 --> 0:20:02.399
<v Speaker 2>with gold coins and banknotes hundreds and hundreds of pounds,

0:20:02.440 --> 0:20:07.160
<v Speaker 2>an absolute fortune to any normal Dubliner. So they thought, well,

0:20:07.160 --> 0:20:10.280
<v Speaker 2>this can't possibly have been robbery, and it was only

0:20:10.400 --> 0:20:14.920
<v Speaker 2>after the accounting department downstairs had gone through every pile

0:20:14.960 --> 0:20:18.240
<v Speaker 2>of money on his desk and compared the sums that

0:20:18.280 --> 0:20:20.520
<v Speaker 2>they counted up with what was in his books. That

0:20:20.600 --> 0:20:23.679
<v Speaker 2>a very substantial sum of money turned out to be missing,

0:20:23.760 --> 0:20:26.399
<v Speaker 2>and at that point they realized that the motive almost

0:20:26.400 --> 0:20:27.840
<v Speaker 2>certainly was financial.

0:20:28.280 --> 0:20:32.159
<v Speaker 1>I still cannot believe when dealing with that amount of money,

0:20:32.240 --> 0:20:35.680
<v Speaker 1>I understand that Dublin was not high crime or any

0:20:35.840 --> 0:20:39.080
<v Speaker 1>violent crime. It's so hard to believe that there's not

0:20:39.200 --> 0:20:42.840
<v Speaker 1>at least another security guard or something somebody there when

0:20:42.880 --> 0:20:46.360
<v Speaker 1>you have that much money and you're there alone at night,

0:20:47.000 --> 0:20:47.920
<v Speaker 1>it is astonishing.

0:20:48.280 --> 0:20:51.320
<v Speaker 2>Even more than that. George Little had only been the

0:20:51.359 --> 0:20:55.560
<v Speaker 2>chief cashier there for about six months, and when he

0:20:55.640 --> 0:20:58.119
<v Speaker 2>was appointed, one of the first things he did was

0:20:58.160 --> 0:21:02.320
<v Speaker 2>make representations to to his bosses that they needed to

0:21:02.359 --> 0:21:06.560
<v Speaker 2>install a screen, a physical barrier to prevent people walking

0:21:06.600 --> 0:21:10.959
<v Speaker 2>straight into his office. And they did eventually get somebody,

0:21:11.000 --> 0:21:13.920
<v Speaker 2>a carpenter, to come up and build a screen so

0:21:13.960 --> 0:21:15.960
<v Speaker 2>that it wasn't possible to walk in that you have

0:21:16.119 --> 0:21:18.119
<v Speaker 2>to go to a little window and talk to him

0:21:18.160 --> 0:21:20.720
<v Speaker 2>through the window. And in fact, he didn't even have

0:21:20.760 --> 0:21:22.800
<v Speaker 2>a lock on the door. And this isn't a city

0:21:22.840 --> 0:21:26.760
<v Speaker 2>that had really extraordinary poverty. Just within a few miles

0:21:26.800 --> 0:21:30.000
<v Speaker 2>of the front door of this station, it had received

0:21:30.280 --> 0:21:33.720
<v Speaker 2>thousands of I mean refugees is not too strong a word.

0:21:34.400 --> 0:21:37.879
<v Speaker 2>From the Great Famine of the previous decade, many many

0:21:37.960 --> 0:21:41.600
<v Speaker 2>Irish people had starved, others had emigrated, and many more

0:21:41.680 --> 0:21:46.119
<v Speaker 2>had left the countryside in search of food and accommodation

0:21:46.280 --> 0:21:48.399
<v Speaker 2>in Dublin. So there was a huge poverty problem. And

0:21:48.440 --> 0:21:51.320
<v Speaker 2>the idea that these hundreds of pounds would not be

0:21:51.359 --> 0:21:56.080
<v Speaker 2>a target for criminals is breathtaking. So yes, I agree,

0:21:56.080 --> 0:21:59.520
<v Speaker 2>But even that was heightened security arrangements. But so much

0:21:59.560 --> 0:22:02.480
<v Speaker 2>more would have been done to protect him in those circumstances.

0:22:02.840 --> 0:22:07.320
<v Speaker 1>Tell me what was forensically available in eighteen fifty six,

0:22:07.480 --> 0:22:10.920
<v Speaker 1>I know, not fingerprinting, although I know we're not too

0:22:10.960 --> 0:22:15.040
<v Speaker 1>far away from fingerprinting, at least in Europe. But what

0:22:15.160 --> 0:22:17.720
<v Speaker 1>else is there? I mean, my memory, at least in

0:22:17.760 --> 0:22:20.080
<v Speaker 1>the United States dealing with a case from eighteen forty

0:22:20.080 --> 0:22:22.159
<v Speaker 1>three was you pretty much had to catch the person

0:22:22.240 --> 0:22:24.840
<v Speaker 1>red handed, I mean, in the middle of the act,

0:22:25.119 --> 0:22:28.120
<v Speaker 1>or have a really reliable witness. What could they even

0:22:28.240 --> 0:22:29.200
<v Speaker 1>use at this point?

0:22:29.520 --> 0:22:33.840
<v Speaker 2>Very little. There are a couple of moments where actual

0:22:33.880 --> 0:22:37.359
<v Speaker 2>scientists are called upon. There was, for instance, on the

0:22:37.400 --> 0:22:41.560
<v Speaker 2>first examination of the station, the police found a red

0:22:41.600 --> 0:22:45.119
<v Speaker 2>stain on one of the door posts one of the

0:22:45.280 --> 0:22:48.439
<v Speaker 2>entrances to the station house, and a section of this

0:22:48.520 --> 0:22:50.960
<v Speaker 2>doorpost was cut out, physically cut out, and sent to

0:22:51.000 --> 0:22:54.639
<v Speaker 2>a professor of chemistry with a request that he tested

0:22:54.680 --> 0:22:56.840
<v Speaker 2>to see if it might be a blood stain. And

0:22:57.400 --> 0:23:00.480
<v Speaker 2>he tested it and said he wasn't sure. He had

0:23:00.480 --> 0:23:04.600
<v Speaker 2>no idea. Similarly, when a murder weapon was found, which

0:23:04.800 --> 0:23:07.240
<v Speaker 2>turned out to be a fitter's hammer, which is an

0:23:07.400 --> 0:23:11.560
<v Speaker 2>enormously heavy hammer, which was carried in a locomotive by

0:23:11.600 --> 0:23:14.080
<v Speaker 2>the driver and was used elsewhere in the station for

0:23:14.480 --> 0:23:17.359
<v Speaker 2>a variety of maintenance and building tasks. There was a

0:23:17.359 --> 0:23:19.440
<v Speaker 2>substance found on the head of this hammer which might

0:23:19.520 --> 0:23:23.040
<v Speaker 2>or might not have been human hair. Again, they attempt

0:23:23.080 --> 0:23:25.000
<v Speaker 2>to find out whether it is human hair. They think

0:23:25.000 --> 0:23:27.040
<v Speaker 2>it looks like it, but they absolutely can't prove it

0:23:27.119 --> 0:23:31.159
<v Speaker 2>in court, So there is no fingerprinting. The examination of

0:23:31.160 --> 0:23:35.120
<v Speaker 2>the crime scene is rudimentary and takes place far too late. Anyway,

0:23:35.359 --> 0:23:37.560
<v Speaker 2>the only evidence that you might say has a sort

0:23:37.560 --> 0:23:41.320
<v Speaker 2>of monoicum of modernity to it is that provided by

0:23:41.440 --> 0:23:44.000
<v Speaker 2>the doctors, you know these days it would be done

0:23:44.000 --> 0:23:47.320
<v Speaker 2>by a pathologist. But his body was examined by three doctors,

0:23:47.760 --> 0:23:49.959
<v Speaker 2>and in fact, when the murder weapon is found, the

0:23:49.960 --> 0:23:53.400
<v Speaker 2>hammer is discovered at the bottom of a canal, they

0:23:53.520 --> 0:23:56.600
<v Speaker 2>actually exhume his body to see if the head of

0:23:56.600 --> 0:23:59.240
<v Speaker 2>the hammer fits into the wounds on his skull, which

0:23:59.320 --> 0:24:02.480
<v Speaker 2>is a slightly horrifying idea now that you dig up

0:24:02.520 --> 0:24:05.480
<v Speaker 2>a body just to do that and in fact provide

0:24:05.520 --> 0:24:08.439
<v Speaker 2>evidence which is probably not all that conclusive. But that

0:24:08.560 --> 0:24:09.960
<v Speaker 2>was the only of course they had.

0:24:10.160 --> 0:24:12.120
<v Speaker 1>Well, let me ask you a series of questions about

0:24:12.160 --> 0:24:14.920
<v Speaker 1>what you just said. So let's say they can't identify

0:24:14.960 --> 0:24:17.280
<v Speaker 1>that this is blood on this piece of wood, and

0:24:17.320 --> 0:24:20.359
<v Speaker 1>then let's say that we can say that this is

0:24:20.400 --> 0:24:24.800
<v Speaker 1>definitively hair, that is human hair. We're not at a

0:24:24.800 --> 0:24:28.280
<v Speaker 1>point where they can determine whose blood this is or

0:24:28.440 --> 0:24:31.480
<v Speaker 1>point to, you know, who the suspect could possibly be.

0:24:31.600 --> 0:24:33.720
<v Speaker 1>All they could say is a murder happened, which to

0:24:33.760 --> 0:24:35.880
<v Speaker 1>me seems of course very obvious. A murder happened here.

0:24:36.160 --> 0:24:38.840
<v Speaker 1>And then the same thing with the weapon. I suppose

0:24:39.200 --> 0:24:42.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe there's a clue within the weapon, like it's a

0:24:42.080 --> 0:24:45.520
<v Speaker 1>specific kind of hammer, that only one person at the

0:24:45.600 --> 0:24:48.320
<v Speaker 1>railway station would have owned. But other than that, what

0:24:48.480 --> 0:24:51.080
<v Speaker 1>good does it do to do these different things? Do

0:24:51.119 --> 0:24:51.480
<v Speaker 1>you think?

0:24:52.280 --> 0:24:55.760
<v Speaker 2>Very little, I would suggest. But one has to also

0:24:55.880 --> 0:24:58.719
<v Speaker 2>bear in mind that the type of case that the

0:24:58.720 --> 0:25:00.760
<v Speaker 2>Crown is hoping to put to together, sorry of the

0:25:00.760 --> 0:25:03.959
<v Speaker 2>Crown being the prosecutors, that the type of case that

0:25:04.000 --> 0:25:07.280
<v Speaker 2>the prosecutors are trying to put together when it comes

0:25:07.280 --> 0:25:09.520
<v Speaker 2>to a court case, the sort of court case that

0:25:09.560 --> 0:25:12.400
<v Speaker 2>they end up with, is one that relies very heavily

0:25:12.440 --> 0:25:16.119
<v Speaker 2>on super In fact, sorry not very heavily, exclusively on

0:25:16.640 --> 0:25:20.880
<v Speaker 2>circumstantial evidence. And a detail like that about there being

0:25:20.920 --> 0:25:24.199
<v Speaker 2>some hair on the hammer may prove absolutely nothing, but

0:25:24.320 --> 0:25:26.800
<v Speaker 2>it's being seen by the prosecutors and the investigators as

0:25:26.840 --> 0:25:30.200
<v Speaker 2>a potential link in a very long chain of circumstantial evidence,

0:25:30.520 --> 0:25:33.120
<v Speaker 2>something which on its own means nothing, but when combined

0:25:33.160 --> 0:25:36.760
<v Speaker 2>with a lot of other apparently trivial findings, might actually

0:25:36.760 --> 0:25:39.240
<v Speaker 2>add up to something which to a jury looks like

0:25:39.280 --> 0:25:40.920
<v Speaker 2>a convincing line of argument.

0:25:40.840 --> 0:25:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Or to a suspect, if there's more than one. You know,

0:25:43.600 --> 0:25:46.560
<v Speaker 1>I did a story on Burke and Hare out of Scotland,

0:25:46.920 --> 0:25:48.639
<v Speaker 1>and the only way that they could get one of

0:25:48.640 --> 0:25:51.520
<v Speaker 1>them was to get the other one to turn on him.

0:25:51.800 --> 0:25:54.159
<v Speaker 1>And so you know, when you think about that, if

0:25:54.840 --> 0:25:58.040
<v Speaker 1>you're accumulating all of the circumstantial evidence, which right might

0:25:58.480 --> 0:26:01.720
<v Speaker 1>arriors now be mean, but if you present that, if

0:26:01.760 --> 0:26:03.560
<v Speaker 1>you find there are two suspects who might have been

0:26:03.600 --> 0:26:05.800
<v Speaker 1>working together, and you present work. We have all this evidence,

0:26:05.800 --> 0:26:08.800
<v Speaker 1>and he doesn't know how not valuable some of this

0:26:08.880 --> 0:26:11.520
<v Speaker 1>might be. Maybe he's more willing to turn on the

0:26:11.560 --> 0:26:14.119
<v Speaker 1>other person, I suppose. I know that's not particularly the

0:26:14.160 --> 0:26:17.240
<v Speaker 1>case in this story, but I was thinking that, like, boy,

0:26:17.280 --> 0:26:19.680
<v Speaker 1>you gather enough stuff, even though it might not seem

0:26:19.720 --> 0:26:22.040
<v Speaker 1>like it's going to lead anywhere, at least it looks

0:26:22.080 --> 0:26:23.920
<v Speaker 1>to the public like you're moving forward.

0:26:24.200 --> 0:26:27.439
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Absolutely, and there is I mean, there is a

0:26:27.480 --> 0:26:32.119
<v Speaker 2>particularity to this case which is probably worth mentioning, which

0:26:32.200 --> 0:26:35.880
<v Speaker 2>is the identity of the man who eventually stood trial

0:26:35.960 --> 0:26:38.080
<v Speaker 2>for this and the nature of the evidence that the

0:26:38.240 --> 0:26:41.400
<v Speaker 2>prosecutors were able to offer against him. And they were

0:26:41.760 --> 0:26:46.280
<v Speaker 2>hugely inconvenience by the fact that the person who accused

0:26:46.359 --> 0:26:48.840
<v Speaker 2>him was none other than his wife. That was a

0:26:49.000 --> 0:26:52.199
<v Speaker 2>fact of great significance in English and Irish law in

0:26:52.240 --> 0:26:56.800
<v Speaker 2>the eighteen fifties, because at that point in legal history,

0:26:57.119 --> 0:27:00.600
<v Speaker 2>it was not possible for a wife to offer evidence

0:27:01.040 --> 0:27:04.119
<v Speaker 2>against her own husband. There's this peculiarity that at that

0:27:04.240 --> 0:27:07.159
<v Speaker 2>point a wife was still seen as the literally the

0:27:07.200 --> 0:27:11.359
<v Speaker 2>possession of a husband and part of him, which meant

0:27:11.359 --> 0:27:15.320
<v Speaker 2>that one person was essentially giving evidence against himself, which

0:27:15.680 --> 0:27:18.920
<v Speaker 2>is a sort of obvious logical absurdity, and it leads

0:27:19.000 --> 0:27:22.919
<v Speaker 2>this situation where somebody can come forward and say, my

0:27:23.080 --> 0:27:26.560
<v Speaker 2>husband has confessed this crime. I know what he did.

0:27:27.080 --> 0:27:29.840
<v Speaker 2>I can show you how he did it. I can

0:27:29.880 --> 0:27:32.200
<v Speaker 2>show you where he hid the money, I can show

0:27:32.240 --> 0:27:34.800
<v Speaker 2>you what he did with the murder weapon. But none

0:27:34.840 --> 0:27:37.760
<v Speaker 2>of that evidence, which would otherwise be damning, is admissible

0:27:37.760 --> 0:27:41.280
<v Speaker 2>in a court of law because a wife is simply

0:27:41.400 --> 0:27:44.240
<v Speaker 2>prohibited from giving that evidence to a judge. Now, that

0:27:44.440 --> 0:27:47.040
<v Speaker 2>is the reason that in this case the police were

0:27:47.359 --> 0:27:51.240
<v Speaker 2>absolutely compelled to put together the most convincing, circumstantial case

0:27:51.240 --> 0:27:51.840
<v Speaker 2>that they could.

0:27:52.160 --> 0:27:55.359
<v Speaker 1>Well, before we get to the main suspect, tell me,

0:27:55.640 --> 0:28:00.359
<v Speaker 1>I think there is one extraordinary event involving and alluded

0:28:00.359 --> 0:28:05.120
<v Speaker 1>to it before. How they secured the two murder weapons?

0:28:05.640 --> 0:28:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Tell me, first of all, how did they decide on

0:28:08.840 --> 0:28:11.040
<v Speaker 1>where to look for these weapons.

0:28:11.320 --> 0:28:14.960
<v Speaker 2>Well, this is the single biggest investigation in the history

0:28:14.960 --> 0:28:18.359
<v Speaker 2>of the Dublin Metropolitan Police up to this point. The

0:28:18.400 --> 0:28:21.479
<v Speaker 2>scale of it is kind of astonishing. The police at

0:28:21.480 --> 0:28:23.600
<v Speaker 2>this point had a single detective division and they were

0:28:23.600 --> 0:28:27.199
<v Speaker 2>pulling in officers from all the other neighboring forces that

0:28:27.240 --> 0:28:31.280
<v Speaker 2>weren't detectives as well, and they ended up scarring every

0:28:31.320 --> 0:28:35.200
<v Speaker 2>inch of the Broadstone Terminus three times. That's everything from

0:28:35.200 --> 0:28:38.760
<v Speaker 2>the roof right down to the sellers, every single room

0:28:38.920 --> 0:28:42.640
<v Speaker 2>in that building. They interviewed pretty much every employee who

0:28:42.640 --> 0:28:45.160
<v Speaker 2>worked there and just word saying something about the scale

0:28:45.160 --> 0:28:47.440
<v Speaker 2>of this as well. By the way they had there

0:28:47.480 --> 0:28:51.600
<v Speaker 2>were workshops where carriages and engines were built. There were

0:28:52.120 --> 0:28:56.440
<v Speaker 2>maintenance offices, there were the ticket offices. There were the housekeepers,

0:28:56.520 --> 0:29:00.480
<v Speaker 2>the station masters, there were stationed police officers who were there.

0:29:00.680 --> 0:29:04.360
<v Speaker 2>It was an extraordinarily large operation. Sixty people worked in

0:29:04.360 --> 0:29:07.640
<v Speaker 2>the station house alone, and as part of their search,

0:29:08.200 --> 0:29:12.480
<v Speaker 2>they drained the canal, which at that point it ended

0:29:12.520 --> 0:29:15.920
<v Speaker 2>in a basin right outside the station. So they drained

0:29:15.920 --> 0:29:20.560
<v Speaker 2>the canal and this army of workmen sifted through the

0:29:20.720 --> 0:29:22.880
<v Speaker 2>stinking mud at the bottom of the canal, and that's

0:29:22.920 --> 0:29:27.200
<v Speaker 2>where they found first the hammer and then subsequently not one,

0:29:27.280 --> 0:29:28.320
<v Speaker 2>but two raisers.

0:29:28.640 --> 0:29:30.440
<v Speaker 1>Now this would be a hammer you said that would

0:29:30.480 --> 0:29:34.160
<v Speaker 1>have been found by anybody laying around in the railway station.

0:29:34.280 --> 0:29:34.760
<v Speaker 1>Is that right?

0:29:35.000 --> 0:29:37.160
<v Speaker 2>Well, there were many. There were many hammers in the

0:29:37.200 --> 0:29:39.360
<v Speaker 2>station because they were used for a variety of tasks.

0:29:39.360 --> 0:29:41.880
<v Speaker 2>They would also have been found on a locomotive for

0:29:41.920 --> 0:29:43.840
<v Speaker 2>the use of the driver, if I suppose if something

0:29:43.960 --> 0:29:46.719
<v Speaker 2>broke down when they're on a journey. But the hammers

0:29:46.720 --> 0:29:49.640
<v Speaker 2>were actually made in the workshops at the station, and

0:29:49.720 --> 0:29:51.960
<v Speaker 2>so it was easy to identify it as a hammer

0:29:51.960 --> 0:29:54.360
<v Speaker 2>that must have been made there and therefore was used

0:29:54.360 --> 0:29:56.640
<v Speaker 2>by somebody who actually lived and lived or worked at

0:29:56.640 --> 0:29:57.040
<v Speaker 2>the station.

0:29:57.400 --> 0:29:59.680
<v Speaker 1>So this would not have been a hammer that some

0:30:00.000 --> 0:30:01.880
<v Speaker 1>stranger could have come in and picked up and said, oh,

0:30:01.880 --> 0:30:03.640
<v Speaker 1>this would be a good murder weapon. This had to

0:30:03.640 --> 0:30:06.080
<v Speaker 1>be with somebody who had access to it.

0:30:06.080 --> 0:30:09.960
<v Speaker 2>It strongly pointed to the suggestion that there was somebody

0:30:10.000 --> 0:30:12.960
<v Speaker 2>at the station who worked there who had done it.

0:30:12.960 --> 0:30:14.680
<v Speaker 2>It's not an object that a member of the public

0:30:14.720 --> 0:30:16.600
<v Speaker 2>would just kind of stumble across. You had to be

0:30:16.640 --> 0:30:18.960
<v Speaker 2>in one of the workshops or actually on board one

0:30:19.000 --> 0:30:21.640
<v Speaker 2>of the locomotives to have access to one. In fact,

0:30:21.680 --> 0:30:24.440
<v Speaker 2>there was. There's a storekeeper and mister Gunning, who is

0:30:24.480 --> 0:30:26.920
<v Speaker 2>quite heavily involved in the story and who at one

0:30:26.960 --> 0:30:31.120
<v Speaker 2>point becomes the police's favored suspect. He is interviewed about

0:30:31.240 --> 0:30:33.360
<v Speaker 2>how they keep the hammers in the store, and it's

0:30:33.400 --> 0:30:35.440
<v Speaker 2>behind a counter where he has to sign out the

0:30:35.440 --> 0:30:38.640
<v Speaker 2>hammers to whoever wants to use one, so that that

0:30:38.840 --> 0:30:41.040
<v Speaker 2>is seen as the obvious source of them of the

0:30:41.120 --> 0:30:41.760
<v Speaker 2>murder weapon.

0:30:42.120 --> 0:30:45.040
<v Speaker 1>So I might be wrong here, but this doesn't seem

0:30:45.080 --> 0:30:47.360
<v Speaker 1>like a practical murder weapon to me. Didn't you say

0:30:47.360 --> 0:30:50.800
<v Speaker 1>it's very very heavy? Or is he lugging this around everywhere?

0:30:51.120 --> 0:30:53.280
<v Speaker 2>It's heavy? But at the same time, the station is

0:30:53.320 --> 0:30:57.360
<v Speaker 2>absolutely full of very powerfully built laborers who were doing

0:30:57.480 --> 0:31:01.000
<v Speaker 2>extremely physical jobs. They were building locomotives, they were building

0:31:01.680 --> 0:31:04.920
<v Speaker 2>railway carriages. There were a lot of very physically strong

0:31:04.960 --> 0:31:05.520
<v Speaker 2>guys there.

0:31:06.160 --> 0:31:08.480
<v Speaker 1>When we talk about a razor, you said they found

0:31:08.520 --> 0:31:11.200
<v Speaker 1>two razors. Is this like a straight razor like what

0:31:11.320 --> 0:31:13.280
<v Speaker 1>men would use to shave with.

0:31:13.520 --> 0:31:15.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's what we would call here a cut threat raiser.

0:31:15.920 --> 0:31:17.480
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if that's the phrase that you use

0:31:17.520 --> 0:31:17.880
<v Speaker 2>as well.

0:31:17.880 --> 0:31:18.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't think so.

0:31:20.960 --> 0:31:24.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they're known kind of cut threat raisers typically, but yes,

0:31:24.000 --> 0:31:27.680
<v Speaker 2>they're they're long, straight, very thin and kind of fearsomely

0:31:27.720 --> 0:31:30.520
<v Speaker 2>sharp blade that you would you'd sharpen on a wetstone.

0:31:30.680 --> 0:31:33.920
<v Speaker 2>They're kind of terrifying objects, but yes, and in fact

0:31:34.000 --> 0:31:36.840
<v Speaker 2>were sort of notorious as the weapon of choice for

0:31:37.480 --> 0:31:40.480
<v Speaker 2>a certain type of murder in this at this period

0:31:40.520 --> 0:31:41.600
<v Speaker 2>of the nineteenth century.

0:31:41.960 --> 0:31:44.360
<v Speaker 1>Sweeney Todd raizor is what I'm picturing.

0:31:44.920 --> 0:31:47.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well exactly. I mean Sweeney Todd is probably the

0:31:47.240 --> 0:31:49.160
<v Speaker 2>best known example. But yes, yeah, you know, it's a

0:31:49.600 --> 0:31:53.160
<v Speaker 2>terrifying and probably the sharpest blade that would be available

0:31:53.400 --> 0:31:55.560
<v Speaker 2>on a day to day basis in a city at

0:31:55.600 --> 0:31:56.000
<v Speaker 2>this point.

0:31:56.400 --> 0:32:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Now you've mentioned mister Gunning. They eventually dismiss as a suspect, right,

0:32:01.240 --> 0:32:02.120
<v Speaker 1>the store manager.

0:32:02.480 --> 0:32:06.960
<v Speaker 2>Yes, But one of the interesting things about him is

0:32:07.200 --> 0:32:09.440
<v Speaker 2>the police were absolutely convinced of his guilt. There were

0:32:09.520 --> 0:32:13.000
<v Speaker 2>a number of slightly shady things about him, apparently, one

0:32:13.000 --> 0:32:15.720
<v Speaker 2>of which was that his furniture seemed to be worth

0:32:15.880 --> 0:32:18.520
<v Speaker 2>much more than he was earning. He also seemed to

0:32:18.560 --> 0:32:21.600
<v Speaker 2>have a track record of maybe doing some shady dealing

0:32:21.840 --> 0:32:24.000
<v Speaker 2>in his job as manager of the stores. He was

0:32:24.040 --> 0:32:27.200
<v Speaker 2>probably acquiring things to the stores that maybe he sold

0:32:27.240 --> 0:32:30.000
<v Speaker 2>on for his own profit, and he was a trusted

0:32:30.040 --> 0:32:33.760
<v Speaker 2>member of the company, so this probably wasn't being noticed

0:32:33.800 --> 0:32:36.880
<v Speaker 2>by the management. In addition to that, there were a

0:32:36.920 --> 0:32:41.000
<v Speaker 2>couple of little incidents where he gave what were subsequently

0:32:41.000 --> 0:32:43.440
<v Speaker 2>shown to be untruthful answers to the police when they

0:32:43.480 --> 0:32:46.400
<v Speaker 2>came to investigate him. I think it's worth saying this

0:32:46.560 --> 0:32:49.120
<v Speaker 2>that one of the reasons I know all this is that,

0:32:49.640 --> 0:32:52.200
<v Speaker 2>amazingly the police files for this case, which is, you know,

0:32:52.240 --> 0:32:54.760
<v Speaker 2>more than one hundred and seventy years old, now, the

0:32:54.800 --> 0:32:58.680
<v Speaker 2>police files have survived, and so I have seen notes

0:32:58.920 --> 0:33:02.400
<v Speaker 2>where police officers discussed the behavior of their suspects in private.

0:33:02.560 --> 0:33:04.640
<v Speaker 2>And there is even in the case of Bernard Gunning,

0:33:04.760 --> 0:33:07.880
<v Speaker 2>the record of surveillance that was placed on him for

0:33:07.920 --> 0:33:11.560
<v Speaker 2>a period of many months. I find this slightly jaw dropping. Now.

0:33:11.640 --> 0:33:14.280
<v Speaker 2>The paper trail shows that he was being followed by

0:33:14.360 --> 0:33:17.680
<v Speaker 2>plainclothes officers under conditions of secrecy for at least three

0:33:17.800 --> 0:33:21.200
<v Speaker 2>or four months in early eighteen fifty seven, and there

0:33:21.240 --> 0:33:24.360
<v Speaker 2>are documents where these officers write what he's doing in

0:33:24.360 --> 0:33:28.480
<v Speaker 2>his spare time late at night, going to hotels, meeting

0:33:28.960 --> 0:33:31.800
<v Speaker 2>unnamed women and going with them to another house in

0:33:31.840 --> 0:33:35.360
<v Speaker 2>the city. So they were absolutely convinced that Gunning was guilty,

0:33:35.560 --> 0:33:38.360
<v Speaker 2>but they didn't have any evidence to prove it, and

0:33:38.360 --> 0:33:41.239
<v Speaker 2>that's what they resorted to, these plainclothes officers tailing him

0:33:41.280 --> 0:33:44.960
<v Speaker 2>around town, reporting on his doings to senior officers.

0:33:45.360 --> 0:33:48.840
<v Speaker 1>Well, we end up dismissing mister Gunning as a suspect.

0:33:48.920 --> 0:33:52.040
<v Speaker 1>How do we land on the man who would eventually

0:33:52.080 --> 0:33:54.800
<v Speaker 1>be the focus of the Dublin Metropolitan Police.

0:33:55.120 --> 0:33:59.160
<v Speaker 2>Well, after an investigation which spanned about six to nine months.

0:33:59.200 --> 0:34:02.240
<v Speaker 2>It began in the eighteen fifty six and the last

0:34:02.360 --> 0:34:06.000
<v Speaker 2>written record of the initial investigation dates from about mid May,

0:34:06.160 --> 0:34:09.800
<v Speaker 2>it all goes quiet, and it's clear that the police

0:34:10.080 --> 0:34:13.560
<v Speaker 2>had despaired of catching the killer and the politicians were

0:34:13.600 --> 0:34:16.120
<v Speaker 2>too embarrassed to keep funding it. After that, it goes

0:34:16.200 --> 0:34:20.239
<v Speaker 2>quiet for about another month, and then out of the blue,

0:34:20.280 --> 0:34:23.600
<v Speaker 2>a woman walked into Well. She knocked on the door

0:34:23.640 --> 0:34:27.440
<v Speaker 2>of the chief prosecutor for that part of Ireland and

0:34:27.560 --> 0:34:30.000
<v Speaker 2>said that she knew who had committed the murder and

0:34:30.040 --> 0:34:33.480
<v Speaker 2>it was her husband. And later that same day she

0:34:33.640 --> 0:34:37.880
<v Speaker 2>led police to three separate sites on the estate where

0:34:38.200 --> 0:34:41.600
<v Speaker 2>they found caches of money, and she also showed them

0:34:41.840 --> 0:34:45.520
<v Speaker 2>where her husband had destroyed evidence, including the clothes he'd

0:34:45.560 --> 0:34:50.000
<v Speaker 2>been wearing, and provided other essentially proof, or so she claimed,

0:34:50.120 --> 0:34:52.200
<v Speaker 2>of his guilt. And that's where the sort of second

0:34:52.239 --> 0:34:54.920
<v Speaker 2>phase kicks in, where they arrest their man and they

0:34:54.960 --> 0:34:57.920
<v Speaker 2>prepare evidence to put him on trial. But as I

0:34:57.960 --> 0:35:00.640
<v Speaker 2>said earlier, they were hamstrung by the fact that they

0:35:00.719 --> 0:35:03.520
<v Speaker 2>simply couldn't use any of the absolutely brilliant evidence they'd

0:35:03.560 --> 0:35:06.800
<v Speaker 2>just been handed by his wife. Now they were able

0:35:06.840 --> 0:35:09.600
<v Speaker 2>to use the evidence of his children, and they interviewed

0:35:09.600 --> 0:35:12.160
<v Speaker 2>all the children, although the youngest was so young that

0:35:12.400 --> 0:35:16.080
<v Speaker 2>his answers really weren't of any value. But they ended

0:35:16.200 --> 0:35:19.080
<v Speaker 2>up putting two of these children on the stand in

0:35:19.160 --> 0:35:22.719
<v Speaker 2>the subsequent trial. The oldest child remained loyal to his

0:35:22.760 --> 0:35:25.799
<v Speaker 2>father and was therefore of no use to them and

0:35:26.200 --> 0:35:29.400
<v Speaker 2>was not required to give evidence. But this very interesting

0:35:29.400 --> 0:35:33.680
<v Speaker 2>family dynamic then emerges, which is that the father and

0:35:33.719 --> 0:35:37.040
<v Speaker 2>the oldest son remain allies. The father being on trial,

0:35:37.320 --> 0:35:40.920
<v Speaker 2>the other children which is two daughters and a younger son,

0:35:41.000 --> 0:35:43.480
<v Speaker 2>and the wife essentially never speak to him again.

0:35:43.760 --> 0:35:46.120
<v Speaker 1>And the suspect is James Sprawlin. Is it how you

0:35:46.120 --> 0:35:46.919
<v Speaker 1>say his last name?

0:35:47.120 --> 0:35:52.080
<v Speaker 2>Yes, Spollin, who's variously spelt, and he's Spolin but also

0:35:52.120 --> 0:35:52.800
<v Speaker 2>known as Spolin.

0:35:53.040 --> 0:35:57.239
<v Speaker 1>So his wife, James's wife is not allowed to give

0:35:57.280 --> 0:36:00.920
<v Speaker 1>evidence because she's considered a possess of his, but the

0:36:01.080 --> 0:36:04.640
<v Speaker 1>children are not. That children can testify against him. That

0:36:04.640 --> 0:36:05.680
<v Speaker 1>doesn't make sense to me.

0:36:06.400 --> 0:36:08.560
<v Speaker 2>Well, the key point is not so much that she

0:36:08.719 --> 0:36:11.080
<v Speaker 2>was a possession of him, but actually in law was

0:36:11.160 --> 0:36:14.320
<v Speaker 2>regarded as part of him. So husband and wife after

0:36:14.360 --> 0:36:17.040
<v Speaker 2>the union are I mean union is the crucial word.

0:36:17.120 --> 0:36:20.720
<v Speaker 2>They become one entity. Okay. There was only one exception

0:36:20.840 --> 0:36:23.680
<v Speaker 2>to that in law, which was that if a husband

0:36:23.719 --> 0:36:27.440
<v Speaker 2>assaulted his wife, it was felt that he had thereby

0:36:27.560 --> 0:36:30.719
<v Speaker 2>sort of dissolved the union, and then a wife was

0:36:31.000 --> 0:36:33.880
<v Speaker 2>able to give evidence against her own husband. But it

0:36:33.920 --> 0:36:37.720
<v Speaker 2>was only in that very specific offense of assault against

0:36:37.800 --> 0:36:40.680
<v Speaker 2>the spouse. In fact, that provision was not changed in

0:36:40.719 --> 0:36:43.960
<v Speaker 2>English law until I think eighteen ninety seven, so it

0:36:44.000 --> 0:36:45.719
<v Speaker 2>persisted for really quite a long time.

0:36:46.040 --> 0:36:48.840
<v Speaker 1>Tell me about the dynamic from what you know between

0:36:49.000 --> 0:36:53.560
<v Speaker 1>James and his wife. Is this a man who's considered abusive?

0:36:53.640 --> 0:36:56.279
<v Speaker 1>Why would she turn on on the I presume to

0:36:56.320 --> 0:36:58.040
<v Speaker 1>be the breadwinner of her family.

0:36:58.560 --> 0:37:01.520
<v Speaker 2>It seems to have been. Yes, I think coercive is

0:37:01.600 --> 0:37:04.680
<v Speaker 2>probably a good word for the nature of their relationship,

0:37:05.120 --> 0:37:09.120
<v Speaker 2>and he was probably abusive her account, which is all

0:37:09.160 --> 0:37:11.560
<v Speaker 2>we really have to go on. But it seems very

0:37:11.600 --> 0:37:17.200
<v Speaker 2>sort of credible. Is that essentially after the crime she

0:37:17.239 --> 0:37:19.640
<v Speaker 2>accuses him of, I think the relationship seems to have

0:37:19.640 --> 0:37:23.760
<v Speaker 2>broken down entirely. But there are several incidents that she documents.

0:37:23.840 --> 0:37:27.319
<v Speaker 2>One is that she was sick and he refused to

0:37:27.360 --> 0:37:29.680
<v Speaker 2>allow a doctrin in the house on grounds of cost.

0:37:30.160 --> 0:37:34.520
<v Speaker 2>But even though she was possibly quite seriously ill, he

0:37:34.560 --> 0:37:37.279
<v Speaker 2>refused to get any medical attention for her at all.

0:37:37.680 --> 0:37:41.719
<v Speaker 2>She also suspected him of trying to poison her, and

0:37:42.160 --> 0:37:45.960
<v Speaker 2>she was very clearly unhappy that she had been forced

0:37:46.200 --> 0:37:49.440
<v Speaker 2>to cover up his crime. She and her eldest son

0:37:49.520 --> 0:37:52.840
<v Speaker 2>had seen him returning in her account covered in blood

0:37:52.920 --> 0:37:55.399
<v Speaker 2>and carrying a bucket full of money, and when he

0:37:55.440 --> 0:37:58.759
<v Speaker 2>saw that she had seen this, he forced her to

0:37:58.800 --> 0:38:01.720
<v Speaker 2>promise that she would now tell a soul, and also

0:38:02.080 --> 0:38:05.279
<v Speaker 2>forced her to help him conceal the money and burn

0:38:05.320 --> 0:38:09.480
<v Speaker 2>the clothes he'd been wearing. Following his arrest, she wanted

0:38:09.520 --> 0:38:11.200
<v Speaker 2>never to have anything to do with him, and in

0:38:11.239 --> 0:38:14.600
<v Speaker 2>fact she ends up in a safe house under an

0:38:14.600 --> 0:38:16.879
<v Speaker 2>assumed name because she is never going to be safe

0:38:16.920 --> 0:38:20.160
<v Speaker 2>from him again. But he was actually quite keen to

0:38:20.560 --> 0:38:22.120
<v Speaker 2>resume the marriage as if nothing had.

0:38:22.000 --> 0:38:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Happened, knowing how much acrimony there is between these two people,

0:38:27.600 --> 0:38:31.120
<v Speaker 1>particularly for the wife, who you know is suspicious of him,

0:38:31.239 --> 0:38:34.520
<v Speaker 1>and he doesn't seem like a very good person based

0:38:34.520 --> 0:38:37.520
<v Speaker 1>on everything she said and everything you've read. Is there

0:38:37.560 --> 0:38:41.839
<v Speaker 1>any doubt in your mind that James Sprawlin was the

0:38:41.840 --> 0:38:43.600
<v Speaker 1>one who committed this murder?

0:38:43.920 --> 0:38:47.719
<v Speaker 2>Well, there are two aspects to this. One is was

0:38:47.800 --> 0:38:50.920
<v Speaker 2>the outcome of the trial the correct outcome? And the

0:38:50.960 --> 0:38:53.040
<v Speaker 2>other is was it him that did it? And there

0:38:53.080 --> 0:38:56.160
<v Speaker 2>is no doubt in my mind that the prosecutors were

0:38:57.320 --> 0:38:59.920
<v Speaker 2>in an impossible situation without the evidence that they might

0:39:00.080 --> 0:39:04.440
<v Speaker 2>have gained from his wife. They had the evidence of

0:39:04.480 --> 0:39:07.239
<v Speaker 2>his eldest daughter, but it became apparent during cross examination

0:39:07.320 --> 0:39:11.200
<v Speaker 2>that she had been probably quite severely coached, and also

0:39:11.640 --> 0:39:13.960
<v Speaker 2>was not really old enough to understand the nature of

0:39:14.040 --> 0:39:18.200
<v Speaker 2>the questions or to remember accurately what had happened on

0:39:18.200 --> 0:39:21.759
<v Speaker 2>one night nine months previously. And it's I think quite

0:39:21.760 --> 0:39:26.760
<v Speaker 2>a gripping court scene because her evidence is absolutely brutally

0:39:26.800 --> 0:39:29.759
<v Speaker 2>taken apart by the defense barrister. It's quite clear that

0:39:29.800 --> 0:39:33.239
<v Speaker 2>the nature of the contradictions that turn up in the

0:39:33.280 --> 0:39:37.359
<v Speaker 2>prosecution evidence in court make it absolutely impossible for a

0:39:37.440 --> 0:39:40.960
<v Speaker 2>jury in its right mind to convict the man who

0:39:41.040 --> 0:39:44.080
<v Speaker 2>was standing accused of the crime. On the other hand,

0:39:44.080 --> 0:39:45.839
<v Speaker 2>it seems quite clear to me that the man who

0:39:45.880 --> 0:39:48.640
<v Speaker 2>was accused of the crime did it. He never gets

0:39:48.719 --> 0:39:52.240
<v Speaker 2>quite to the point of confessing to it, but reading

0:39:52.239 --> 0:39:54.880
<v Speaker 2>between the lines, there are moments when he more or

0:39:55.000 --> 0:39:58.480
<v Speaker 2>less acknowledges what he's done. And one of the things

0:39:58.560 --> 0:40:01.359
<v Speaker 2>that I quite enjoyed about the story is that there's

0:40:01.400 --> 0:40:05.480
<v Speaker 2>this amazing period of about two weeks after he's acquitted,

0:40:05.719 --> 0:40:09.200
<v Speaker 2>and he's actually roaming free in Dublin, a free man.

0:40:09.800 --> 0:40:12.720
<v Speaker 2>But half of Dublin, or even two thirds of Dublin

0:40:12.760 --> 0:40:16.240
<v Speaker 2>thinks he's definitely the guilty man. And yet he decides

0:40:16.280 --> 0:40:19.080
<v Speaker 2>to go on stage in a Dublin theater and do

0:40:19.120 --> 0:40:22.120
<v Speaker 2>a one man show about why it couldn't possibly have

0:40:22.200 --> 0:40:26.560
<v Speaker 2>been him that killed George Little at the Broadstone railway station.

0:40:27.080 --> 0:40:30.759
<v Speaker 2>He was absolutely shameless and had no sense of there's

0:40:30.800 --> 0:40:33.840
<v Speaker 2>no delicacy there or any sense that the dead man's

0:40:33.880 --> 0:40:39.200
<v Speaker 2>family might be impossibly offended by his behavior. So he

0:40:39.320 --> 0:40:43.520
<v Speaker 2>turns into a sort of horribly compelling character, and one

0:40:43.560 --> 0:40:47.680
<v Speaker 2>who certainly lacks self awareness. Even if he were not guilty,

0:40:47.880 --> 0:40:50.719
<v Speaker 2>he certainly behaved in the most appalling way.

0:40:51.160 --> 0:40:54.239
<v Speaker 1>Who would put him on stage, Thomas, I mean somebody

0:40:54.360 --> 0:40:57.560
<v Speaker 1>who owned a theater or whatever said, Okay, this seems

0:40:57.600 --> 0:41:00.000
<v Speaker 1>like a good idea. I mean this, doesn't this seem

0:41:00.280 --> 0:41:01.720
<v Speaker 1>beneath the people of Dublin.

0:41:02.200 --> 0:41:06.000
<v Speaker 2>Well, all, it was all at his own instigation, so

0:41:06.040 --> 0:41:08.960
<v Speaker 2>he would have hired He would have hired the theater himself,

0:41:09.480 --> 0:41:11.960
<v Speaker 2>and the receipts were absolutely pitiful. I think he made

0:41:12.000 --> 0:41:14.520
<v Speaker 2>a loss that the number of attendees is actually recorded

0:41:14.560 --> 0:41:18.000
<v Speaker 2>in one of the newspaper accounts. And he had booked

0:41:18.040 --> 0:41:21.240
<v Speaker 2>this theater for two daily shows for a week's run initially,

0:41:21.280 --> 0:41:24.080
<v Speaker 2>and I think he was hoping to not only extend

0:41:24.080 --> 0:41:26.279
<v Speaker 2>the run but then go on tour around Ireland with

0:41:26.320 --> 0:41:29.280
<v Speaker 2>his show as well. And in the event he did

0:41:29.680 --> 0:41:33.319
<v Speaker 2>two shows. He did one matinee and one evening show,

0:41:34.040 --> 0:41:36.440
<v Speaker 2>and the first one things became a bit rarey on

0:41:36.480 --> 0:41:39.360
<v Speaker 2>the streets. But during a second show, there was a

0:41:39.400 --> 0:41:42.919
<v Speaker 2>full blown riot on the streets outside, people throwing rocks

0:41:42.920 --> 0:41:46.520
<v Speaker 2>and breaking windows, and inside the theater he was booed

0:41:46.560 --> 0:41:49.480
<v Speaker 2>off the stage. So it was a catastrophe for him personally.

0:41:49.880 --> 0:41:52.120
<v Speaker 2>And that was the moment at which it became apparent

0:41:52.160 --> 0:41:54.520
<v Speaker 2>that he could no longer stay in Dublin, and that's

0:41:54.560 --> 0:41:57.600
<v Speaker 2>the moment he decides to leave Ireland and find a

0:41:57.640 --> 0:41:58.520
<v Speaker 2>way of emigrating.

0:41:58.840 --> 0:42:01.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I have never heard of, certainly in this

0:42:01.520 --> 0:42:04.960
<v Speaker 1>time period, in many time periods, of his socioeconomic background,

0:42:05.640 --> 0:42:10.160
<v Speaker 1>being so determined to salvage his public image that he's

0:42:10.239 --> 0:42:13.800
<v Speaker 1>doing something like this. It's a little shocking to me, it.

0:42:13.640 --> 0:42:16.720
<v Speaker 2>Is, and he becomes like an almost it's a vaudeville act. Really.

0:42:17.360 --> 0:42:19.640
<v Speaker 2>There's an item that I really wish I had been

0:42:19.640 --> 0:42:21.879
<v Speaker 2>able to track down. I'm sure it was destroyed years

0:42:21.920 --> 0:42:24.080
<v Speaker 2>and years ago. But during the trial, and this was

0:42:24.200 --> 0:42:29.040
<v Speaker 2>very common for complex criminal cases in the days before photographs,

0:42:29.520 --> 0:42:31.960
<v Speaker 2>that it was important to give the jurious sense of

0:42:32.000 --> 0:42:34.600
<v Speaker 2>the crime scene and of the sort of wider setting

0:42:34.680 --> 0:42:37.600
<v Speaker 2>in which this action is taking place. So they commissioned

0:42:37.640 --> 0:42:41.520
<v Speaker 2>a very detailed wooden model of the station building. It

0:42:41.520 --> 0:42:43.440
<v Speaker 2>would be a wonderful thing to have now, and this

0:42:43.800 --> 0:42:48.200
<v Speaker 2>enormous it was several feet long. This model was displayed

0:42:48.200 --> 0:42:50.560
<v Speaker 2>in the middle of the courtroom and then the barristers,

0:42:51.000 --> 0:42:53.040
<v Speaker 2>the lawyers would point to bits of it to explain

0:42:53.160 --> 0:42:55.959
<v Speaker 2>what was going on in the examinations they were doing.

0:42:56.480 --> 0:42:59.280
<v Speaker 2>And after the trial, James Spollin, the man who stood

0:42:59.280 --> 0:43:01.879
<v Speaker 2>trial and being a quitted of a crime, manages to

0:43:02.040 --> 0:43:04.719
<v Speaker 2>take possession of this wooden model and takes it with

0:43:04.840 --> 0:43:08.120
<v Speaker 2>him to Liverpool where he ends up and puts it

0:43:08.160 --> 0:43:10.920
<v Speaker 2>on display. So not only is he doing a stage

0:43:10.920 --> 0:43:13.520
<v Speaker 2>show in a theater, he's also doing his exhibition where

0:43:13.520 --> 0:43:17.040
<v Speaker 2>he puts this magnificent wooden model of Broadstone railway station

0:43:17.800 --> 0:43:21.680
<v Speaker 2>in an exhibition hall in Liverpool, and he stands next

0:43:21.680 --> 0:43:24.040
<v Speaker 2>to it giving a sort of lecture explaining all the

0:43:24.080 --> 0:43:26.680
<v Speaker 2>bits of the station and where he was and where

0:43:26.680 --> 0:43:28.719
<v Speaker 2>George Little was when he was killed, and how it

0:43:28.719 --> 0:43:30.839
<v Speaker 2>couldn't possibly have been him that killed him.

0:43:31.200 --> 0:43:34.000
<v Speaker 1>So you would think that the story was over, because

0:43:34.440 --> 0:43:38.440
<v Speaker 1>you know James Sprawlin has been acquitted. He walks away,

0:43:39.120 --> 0:43:41.840
<v Speaker 1>he tries his vaudeville act. It doesn't work. It is

0:43:41.880 --> 0:43:46.200
<v Speaker 1>an unsolved officially an unsolved case. I'm assuming the murder

0:43:46.200 --> 0:43:50.960
<v Speaker 1>of George Little. Where does this phrenologist, doctor Frederick Bridges

0:43:51.040 --> 0:43:53.160
<v Speaker 1>come in? Why is he coming in at all? At

0:43:53.160 --> 0:43:53.880
<v Speaker 1>this point?

0:43:54.080 --> 0:43:56.799
<v Speaker 2>It's a fortunate quirk that he turns up because it

0:43:56.880 --> 0:43:59.880
<v Speaker 2>adds this extra whole dimension to the story. But he

0:44:00.000 --> 0:44:03.160
<v Speaker 2>he just happened by chance to be living in Liverpool.

0:44:03.440 --> 0:44:06.080
<v Speaker 2>And the reason that Spolin and his son, who, as

0:44:06.120 --> 0:44:10.360
<v Speaker 2>I said earlier, remains loyal to his father, James S.

0:44:10.360 --> 0:44:12.920
<v Speaker 2>Bollin and his son end up in Liverpool because they

0:44:12.920 --> 0:44:15.440
<v Speaker 2>are trying to find a way of emigrating to America

0:44:15.920 --> 0:44:19.480
<v Speaker 2>or somewhere else America's In fact, officially we don't know

0:44:19.520 --> 0:44:22.560
<v Speaker 2>where they went to. I suspect strongly it was New York,

0:44:23.280 --> 0:44:26.840
<v Speaker 2>but Liverpool is a place where Irish immigrants typically embark,

0:44:27.440 --> 0:44:30.000
<v Speaker 2>and so he's needing to find a way of raising

0:44:30.239 --> 0:44:34.319
<v Speaker 2>the fair and he is introduced to Frederick Bridges. Now,

0:44:34.360 --> 0:44:37.719
<v Speaker 2>Frederick Bridges was a phrenologist, It's worth saying I think

0:44:37.760 --> 0:44:40.719
<v Speaker 2>that he was. Even in the eighteen fifties, he was

0:44:40.719 --> 0:44:43.320
<v Speaker 2>seen as a bit of an odd ball in the

0:44:43.800 --> 0:44:46.480
<v Speaker 2>haydo of phrenology was between about the seventeen nineties and

0:44:46.480 --> 0:44:49.239
<v Speaker 2>the eighteen twenties. By the eighteen fifties, most scientists really

0:44:49.239 --> 0:44:52.920
<v Speaker 2>did think it was nonsense, but Bridges really stuck to

0:44:52.960 --> 0:44:55.919
<v Speaker 2>his guns, and he had this whole private theory which

0:44:55.960 --> 0:45:00.759
<v Speaker 2>involved a single angle that he measured involving the relationship

0:45:00.800 --> 0:45:04.040
<v Speaker 2>between a person's jawline and their ear and within a

0:45:04.080 --> 0:45:08.560
<v Speaker 2>particular range of angle. He said, essentially, psychopaths as we

0:45:08.560 --> 0:45:13.240
<v Speaker 2>would understand them today, and dangerous murderer types, their measurements

0:45:13.280 --> 0:45:15.799
<v Speaker 2>would be very characteristic, so you could tell them. And

0:45:15.840 --> 0:45:20.120
<v Speaker 2>he had spent years traveling around the country to executions,

0:45:20.880 --> 0:45:24.760
<v Speaker 2>public executions, and he would seek permission from the prison

0:45:24.800 --> 0:45:27.800
<v Speaker 2>governor of the prisons where these executions were taking place,

0:45:27.920 --> 0:45:30.240
<v Speaker 2>and he would take a plaster cast of the head

0:45:30.680 --> 0:45:34.080
<v Speaker 2>of the recently executed man, and then he would take

0:45:34.120 --> 0:45:38.040
<v Speaker 2>these plaster casts home and conduct his measurements. And he

0:45:38.239 --> 0:45:42.040
<v Speaker 2>claimed to approved beyond all doubts that all these murderers

0:45:42.440 --> 0:45:46.960
<v Speaker 2>had a very significant cranial features in common. And from

0:45:47.000 --> 0:45:50.400
<v Speaker 2>this he built up an entire theory relating to violent

0:45:50.440 --> 0:45:52.960
<v Speaker 2>men in the crimes they committed and the shapes of

0:45:53.000 --> 0:45:55.280
<v Speaker 2>their heads. And the reason he was interested in spollen

0:45:55.400 --> 0:45:58.560
<v Speaker 2>was although he had tested his theory repeatedly on dead

0:45:58.640 --> 0:46:01.200
<v Speaker 2>men who were proved to be murdered. He wanted to

0:46:01.239 --> 0:46:04.400
<v Speaker 2>show that his theory also had predictive power. So he

0:46:04.480 --> 0:46:08.240
<v Speaker 2>wanted to show that by measuring an accused murderer's head,

0:46:08.920 --> 0:46:12.160
<v Speaker 2>he could personally prove whether they had committed the crime,

0:46:12.440 --> 0:46:15.279
<v Speaker 2>which you can see how if this actually had any

0:46:15.280 --> 0:46:18.040
<v Speaker 2>truth to it would be an extremely valuable thing that

0:46:18.080 --> 0:46:21.680
<v Speaker 2>you would be able to tell people in advance whether

0:46:21.719 --> 0:46:25.719
<v Speaker 2>they were dangerous or not, and therefore remove them from

0:46:25.800 --> 0:46:28.240
<v Speaker 2>society if they showed a threat.

0:46:28.880 --> 0:46:32.080
<v Speaker 1>So Sprawlin is interested in doing this because he needs

0:46:32.160 --> 0:46:33.800
<v Speaker 1>money to be able to get out of Doublin.

0:46:33.920 --> 0:46:37.520
<v Speaker 2>Is that right, yes, Bridges hears that Spollin is in Liverpool,

0:46:37.840 --> 0:46:40.919
<v Speaker 2>is down on his luck and needs money. So he

0:46:41.160 --> 0:46:44.040
<v Speaker 2>hatches this plan, which is I'm going to get myself

0:46:44.080 --> 0:46:47.400
<v Speaker 2>introduced to James Spollin and I'm going to give him money,

0:46:47.600 --> 0:46:49.640
<v Speaker 2>and in return for that money, I want to measure

0:46:49.680 --> 0:46:52.920
<v Speaker 2>his head. It's one of the strangest faust impacts you'll

0:46:52.960 --> 0:46:56.000
<v Speaker 2>ever hear, but he wants to measure a guy's skull

0:46:56.080 --> 0:46:59.200
<v Speaker 2>in return for a check. Essentially, it takes quite a while,

0:46:59.200 --> 0:47:01.600
<v Speaker 2>but Spallin is a actually convinced, and the deal they

0:47:01.640 --> 0:47:05.399
<v Speaker 2>strike is that in return for making a plaster cast

0:47:05.440 --> 0:47:09.240
<v Speaker 2>of Spolin's head and taking a photograph of him, Bridges

0:47:09.280 --> 0:47:13.440
<v Speaker 2>will pay his fare to emigrate, and fortunately for us,

0:47:13.480 --> 0:47:17.319
<v Speaker 2>he also writes a little pamphlet about this encounter, from

0:47:17.320 --> 0:47:21.319
<v Speaker 2>which we understand that he spent several weeks essentially charming him,

0:47:21.360 --> 0:47:24.680
<v Speaker 2>befriending him. There's a first meeting in a ced pub

0:47:24.760 --> 0:47:27.520
<v Speaker 2>in Liverpool, and then he ends up inviting him to

0:47:27.520 --> 0:47:30.840
<v Speaker 2>meet his wife, and Spoonin and his son go for

0:47:30.920 --> 0:47:35.640
<v Speaker 2>dinner there several times, and eventually he is allowed to

0:47:36.239 --> 0:47:39.440
<v Speaker 2>make the plaster cast and take the photographs, which sadly

0:47:39.480 --> 0:47:41.520
<v Speaker 2>we don't have the original photographs, but there is a

0:47:41.640 --> 0:47:43.799
<v Speaker 2>drawing made from the photographs which gives us a good

0:47:44.000 --> 0:47:47.879
<v Speaker 2>likeness of Sponin, and then, having achieved that, he pays

0:47:47.920 --> 0:47:51.160
<v Speaker 2>for him to emigrate. And we don't know because the

0:47:51.200 --> 0:47:53.399
<v Speaker 2>condition of this one of the conditions of this deal

0:47:53.520 --> 0:47:56.080
<v Speaker 2>was that he was not to divulge ever where he went.

0:47:56.880 --> 0:47:58.640
<v Speaker 2>But we do know the date he left, or rather

0:47:58.680 --> 0:48:01.759
<v Speaker 2>the weekend, and from that it is possible to at

0:48:01.840 --> 0:48:05.080
<v Speaker 2>least rule out many of the many of the options,

0:48:05.440 --> 0:48:07.839
<v Speaker 2>and from what I've seen of I mean, you can

0:48:07.880 --> 0:48:10.719
<v Speaker 2>tell these days. The records are so complete you can

0:48:10.760 --> 0:48:14.240
<v Speaker 2>find out exactly what ships left Liverpool on a single

0:48:14.280 --> 0:48:16.960
<v Speaker 2>weekend in eighteen fifty seven, or in fact it was

0:48:17.040 --> 0:48:20.080
<v Speaker 2>January eighteen fifty eight by the time he embarked. So

0:48:20.719 --> 0:48:22.880
<v Speaker 2>I'm reasonably confident that I know that he did go

0:48:22.960 --> 0:48:25.520
<v Speaker 2>to New York. As I say, it's all shrouded rather

0:48:25.560 --> 0:48:28.560
<v Speaker 2>in mystery that the final days of his life in Liverpool.

0:48:28.880 --> 0:48:33.600
<v Speaker 1>So is Bridges. Doctor Bridges convinced that a man got

0:48:33.600 --> 0:48:37.239
<v Speaker 1>away with murder. After he measures this angle, he.

0:48:37.320 --> 0:48:39.759
<v Speaker 2>Was absolutely convinced to the extent that he wrote a

0:48:39.840 --> 0:48:43.480
<v Speaker 2>letter to the Home Secretary in London saying, this man

0:48:43.600 --> 0:48:46.920
<v Speaker 2>Spallen is so dangerous according to the measurements I have

0:48:46.960 --> 0:48:49.560
<v Speaker 2>taken of his skull, that he ought not to be

0:48:49.600 --> 0:48:52.840
<v Speaker 2>at liberty, and I strongly suggest that you take measures

0:48:52.880 --> 0:48:55.880
<v Speaker 2>to deprive him of his liberty. And this letter survives

0:48:56.000 --> 0:48:58.920
<v Speaker 2>brilliantly the text of it at least, and we also

0:48:59.040 --> 0:49:01.600
<v Speaker 2>know sadly that he didn't receive any response. But you

0:49:01.600 --> 0:49:04.719
<v Speaker 2>can only imagine the reaction of somebody in the Home

0:49:04.760 --> 0:49:07.319
<v Speaker 2>Office in London receiving this letter saying I've measured a

0:49:07.360 --> 0:49:09.760
<v Speaker 2>man's skull and I can tell you he's definitely a murderer.

0:49:10.239 --> 0:49:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Well, I mean, you know, phrenology is fascinating. I interviewed

0:49:14.680 --> 0:49:18.240
<v Speaker 1>a neurologist who was teaching at the University of Edinburgh,

0:49:18.360 --> 0:49:21.759
<v Speaker 1>and he really dabbled in phrenology for fun, as like

0:49:21.800 --> 0:49:24.400
<v Speaker 1>a parlor trick, and he showed me a skull and

0:49:24.560 --> 0:49:27.160
<v Speaker 1>all the different sections. It was like you were at

0:49:27.239 --> 0:49:30.919
<v Speaker 1>certain amount of bumps. Here you were extraordinarily passionate, you

0:49:31.040 --> 0:49:35.160
<v Speaker 1>were violent. In another section you were incredibly intelligent or

0:49:35.200 --> 0:49:38.600
<v Speaker 1>a genius or I mean some of the phrases were

0:49:38.640 --> 0:49:42.600
<v Speaker 1>so interesting. So at least doctor Bridges homed in on

0:49:41.719 --> 0:49:45.319
<v Speaker 1>one little section and that's it. But what do you

0:49:45.480 --> 0:49:48.279
<v Speaker 1>think is the significance of that part kind of act

0:49:48.400 --> 0:49:52.560
<v Speaker 1>three of your story with phrenology? Because James Sprawlin's in

0:49:52.560 --> 0:49:54.279
<v Speaker 1>the wind, we have no idea, we think he's in

0:49:54.320 --> 0:49:57.360
<v Speaker 1>New York. Do you feel like this really could have

0:49:57.560 --> 0:50:01.800
<v Speaker 1>led to something, you know, because Bridges was really pushing

0:50:01.840 --> 0:50:02.719
<v Speaker 1>this idea.

0:50:02.880 --> 0:50:07.080
<v Speaker 2>Well, what comes across from reading his account of their

0:50:07.120 --> 0:50:10.719
<v Speaker 2>meetings is two things. One, there is a rawness to

0:50:10.760 --> 0:50:13.880
<v Speaker 2>his descriptions of his encounters with Spollin, which lead me

0:50:13.920 --> 0:50:17.799
<v Speaker 2>to think that they are broadly speaking truthful. But at

0:50:17.800 --> 0:50:21.360
<v Speaker 2>the same time I came inescapably to the conclusion that

0:50:21.400 --> 0:50:24.640
<v Speaker 2>he was a terrific crank. And when he starts writing

0:50:24.680 --> 0:50:27.880
<v Speaker 2>about himself, his version of his life history is so

0:50:28.120 --> 0:50:30.400
<v Speaker 2>unbelievable that there can be no doubt that he was

0:50:30.440 --> 0:50:33.080
<v Speaker 2>to some degree a fantasist. He claims, for instance, that

0:50:33.080 --> 0:50:35.120
<v Speaker 2>at the age of nine, he swam the English Channel.

0:50:35.400 --> 0:50:39.319
<v Speaker 2>There's a brief essay about his own biography which sort

0:50:39.320 --> 0:50:43.840
<v Speaker 2>of prefaces his encounter with Spollin, and it's completely absurd

0:50:44.280 --> 0:50:46.400
<v Speaker 2>the number of things he claims to have taught himself.

0:50:46.440 --> 0:50:49.280
<v Speaker 2>He says he was I think one of twenty children

0:50:49.400 --> 0:50:52.359
<v Speaker 2>or something. He says he swam the channel. He has

0:50:52.400 --> 0:50:55.239
<v Speaker 2>a whole load of completely unlikely adventures, and then is

0:50:55.320 --> 0:50:58.560
<v Speaker 2>returned to his parents by a kindly merchant who terms

0:50:58.600 --> 0:51:01.520
<v Speaker 2>him a genius. So there's a lot of self aggrandizement

0:51:01.600 --> 0:51:04.920
<v Speaker 2>going on there. At the same time, although he was

0:51:04.920 --> 0:51:08.000
<v Speaker 2>obviously regarded with a lot of sort of pity and

0:51:08.680 --> 0:51:11.439
<v Speaker 2>amusement by some of his contemporaries, he had the ear

0:51:11.480 --> 0:51:14.359
<v Speaker 2>of some of the most senior people in government, The

0:51:14.400 --> 0:51:18.200
<v Speaker 2>Prime Minister Palmerston, who had previously been in office and

0:51:18.239 --> 0:51:20.640
<v Speaker 2>at this point in the eighteen fifties was out of

0:51:20.640 --> 0:51:22.480
<v Speaker 2>office again but would later go on to be Prime

0:51:22.480 --> 0:51:27.080
<v Speaker 2>Minister again, was very interested in phrenology and gave Bridges

0:51:27.360 --> 0:51:30.279
<v Speaker 2>an audience at which Bridges was permitted to feel his

0:51:30.360 --> 0:51:35.360
<v Speaker 2>skull and examine him, but also present his ideas about

0:51:35.520 --> 0:51:39.360
<v Speaker 2>the utility of phrenology for detecting criminals, and as a

0:51:39.360 --> 0:51:41.480
<v Speaker 2>result of that he was given a direct grant of

0:51:41.520 --> 0:51:43.920
<v Speaker 2>fifty pounds, which at the time was quite a considerable

0:51:43.960 --> 0:51:46.520
<v Speaker 2>sum of money in order to develop his work.

0:51:46.840 --> 0:51:50.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this story to me is so interesting because

0:51:50.480 --> 0:51:54.279
<v Speaker 1>here you have this man, George Little. He's not married, right,

0:51:54.360 --> 0:51:57.080
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't have any kids, He's taking care of members

0:51:57.120 --> 0:52:00.480
<v Speaker 1>of his family, he's working hard. Late one night he's

0:52:00.600 --> 0:52:05.759
<v Speaker 1>murdered brutally and his killer, we're going to go ahead

0:52:05.800 --> 0:52:09.320
<v Speaker 1>and say the killer, right, James Sprawlin is set free

0:52:09.600 --> 0:52:13.520
<v Speaker 1>because of an antiquated law where his wife is not

0:52:13.600 --> 0:52:17.319
<v Speaker 1>allowed to give evidence. And then you know, we might

0:52:17.400 --> 0:52:21.120
<v Speaker 1>have had a massive contribution which would have been terrible

0:52:21.600 --> 0:52:26.080
<v Speaker 1>to investigations based on an antiquated and then a joke

0:52:26.320 --> 0:52:30.439
<v Speaker 1>junk science in phrenology, So sort of like like there's

0:52:30.480 --> 0:52:35.520
<v Speaker 1>several things that are rooted and inaccuracies that really pop

0:52:35.600 --> 0:52:36.840
<v Speaker 1>up in this story of yours.

0:52:37.320 --> 0:52:41.200
<v Speaker 2>Yes, and this is an era before modern techniques of

0:52:41.239 --> 0:52:44.200
<v Speaker 2>criminal investigation, so you sort of can't blame them for

0:52:44.400 --> 0:52:47.200
<v Speaker 2>relying on what was standard at the time. I mean,

0:52:47.360 --> 0:52:50.160
<v Speaker 2>I think this is where actually a parallel with what

0:52:50.280 --> 0:52:52.120
<v Speaker 2>I was writing about before this book, which is the

0:52:52.160 --> 0:52:55.240
<v Speaker 2>history of medicine, is actually quite worthwhile. You can't really

0:52:55.840 --> 0:53:00.120
<v Speaker 2>blame doctors of the eighteenth century for relying on on

0:53:00.200 --> 0:53:03.880
<v Speaker 2>leeches and arsenic and drugs that we now know to

0:53:03.920 --> 0:53:07.440
<v Speaker 2>be harmful rather than helpful, in that they were rooted

0:53:07.640 --> 0:53:11.759
<v Speaker 2>in centuries of tradition and what they thought was good scholarship.

0:53:11.960 --> 0:53:14.840
<v Speaker 2>And the same is true for criminal investigation. Really they

0:53:14.920 --> 0:53:18.719
<v Speaker 2>could only rely on the techniques they knew, and of

0:53:18.760 --> 0:53:21.640
<v Speaker 2>course they used the laws that seemed to be just

0:53:21.760 --> 0:53:25.280
<v Speaker 2>to them. But you know, we have twenty twenty hindsight,

0:53:25.440 --> 0:53:27.719
<v Speaker 2>we can see how ludicrous some of these ideas and

0:53:27.800 --> 0:53:30.440
<v Speaker 2>laws look today, but living in their world and their

0:53:30.440 --> 0:53:32.120
<v Speaker 2>cultural familiar not so much.

0:53:32.680 --> 0:53:35.800
<v Speaker 1>My second book, American Sherlock, was about a forensic scientist

0:53:35.800 --> 0:53:38.000
<v Speaker 1>who worked in the nineteen twenties, where it seems like

0:53:38.080 --> 0:53:41.440
<v Speaker 1>every forensic technique was developed or invented, at least in

0:53:41.440 --> 0:53:46.279
<v Speaker 1>the United States, development of fingerprinting, bloodstained pattern analysis, more

0:53:46.320 --> 0:53:49.520
<v Speaker 1>in depth ballistics, you know, the study of bugs, all

0:53:49.600 --> 0:53:52.200
<v Speaker 1>of these things. And the issue that I have found

0:53:52.400 --> 0:53:55.200
<v Speaker 1>even with the star of my book, the forensic scientist

0:53:55.239 --> 0:53:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Oskar Heinrich, was that he was so definitive. I mean

0:53:59.520 --> 0:54:02.120
<v Speaker 1>it was like, this is what my test says. It

0:54:02.239 --> 0:54:05.919
<v Speaker 1>is the truth. There is no other explanation when you're

0:54:06.080 --> 0:54:10.320
<v Speaker 1>at the nascent era of discovering all of these tools.

0:54:10.360 --> 0:54:13.080
<v Speaker 1>And so when that was for me the dangerous part

0:54:13.120 --> 0:54:17.200
<v Speaker 1>of learning about phrenology, where that is to say, Thomas Morris,

0:54:17.320 --> 0:54:20.680
<v Speaker 1>look at the angle between his ear and you know,

0:54:20.840 --> 0:54:25.120
<v Speaker 1>his mouth, there's along his jawline. Definitively, this is somebody

0:54:25.160 --> 0:54:28.000
<v Speaker 1>who is going to kill someone. And I still think

0:54:28.120 --> 0:54:30.880
<v Speaker 1>those kinds of statements are dangerous to sit on a

0:54:30.920 --> 0:54:33.799
<v Speaker 1>stand as an expert and say there is no other explanation,

0:54:34.400 --> 0:54:38.000
<v Speaker 1>when oftentimes there is you can exclude, but sometimes you

0:54:38.040 --> 0:54:38.800
<v Speaker 1>can't include.

0:54:38.840 --> 0:54:42.920
<v Speaker 2>You know, that's true. Palmerston was a bit of an outlier,

0:54:43.200 --> 0:54:47.880
<v Speaker 2>luckily fortunately for us, Luckily, fortunately for criminal investigation. At

0:54:47.920 --> 0:54:51.080
<v Speaker 2>the time, nobody else really took him seriously, and in fact,

0:54:51.120 --> 0:54:54.320
<v Speaker 2>when he subsequently went back to Ireland on a speaking

0:54:54.400 --> 0:54:56.759
<v Speaker 2>to a thinking that people would be crowding to hear

0:54:57.160 --> 0:54:59.800
<v Speaker 2>crowding into the theaters to hear him talk about Spallen

0:55:00.040 --> 0:55:03.160
<v Speaker 2>and about how this wonderful theory meant that murderers like

0:55:03.239 --> 0:55:05.400
<v Speaker 2>him would in future be caught before they'd even committed

0:55:05.440 --> 0:55:10.560
<v Speaker 2>a crime. Nobody turned up. It was embarrassing. He had

0:55:10.600 --> 0:55:13.360
<v Speaker 2>his luggage full of copies of his book to sell

0:55:13.520 --> 0:55:16.480
<v Speaker 2>and nobody wanted one. And I think after his first

0:55:16.520 --> 0:55:19.920
<v Speaker 2>speaking engagement, the rest of his trip was canceled, so

0:55:20.520 --> 0:55:22.799
<v Speaker 2>he was sort of he was a man out of time.

0:55:22.840 --> 0:55:23.080
<v Speaker 1>Really.

0:55:23.239 --> 0:55:25.880
<v Speaker 2>I suspect if he had been promulgating these ideas forty

0:55:25.960 --> 0:55:28.960
<v Speaker 2>years earlier, or even thirty years earlier, he would have

0:55:29.000 --> 0:55:31.560
<v Speaker 2>had much more of an audience, But as it was,

0:55:32.200 --> 0:55:35.280
<v Speaker 2>his was one of half a dozen sort of crank

0:55:35.360 --> 0:55:39.440
<v Speaker 2>ideas that were indulged in the investigation. Also, at one

0:55:39.440 --> 0:55:43.120
<v Speaker 2>point used a medium. Sadly he or she is not named,

0:55:43.239 --> 0:55:46.760
<v Speaker 2>but they got somebody who claimed to have supernatural powers

0:55:47.000 --> 0:55:49.480
<v Speaker 2>to speak to the dead man to find out who

0:55:49.520 --> 0:55:51.560
<v Speaker 2>had murdered him.

0:55:51.640 --> 0:55:54.440
<v Speaker 1>Well, we start with George Little, the victim, and I

0:55:54.440 --> 0:55:57.000
<v Speaker 1>think we end with George Little. This is a man,

0:55:57.120 --> 0:55:59.439
<v Speaker 1>as I said before, a family man, doing the best

0:55:59.440 --> 0:56:02.640
<v Speaker 1>he can for his family, and he ends up dead

0:56:02.800 --> 0:56:06.480
<v Speaker 1>and ultimately with no justice whatsoever. At the end of

0:56:06.520 --> 0:56:09.120
<v Speaker 1>the day, when you're done writing this book and you've

0:56:09.160 --> 0:56:11.760
<v Speaker 1>closed it up and you've sent it to your editor,

0:56:12.360 --> 0:56:15.640
<v Speaker 1>that's still must weigh on you. You're doing this story with

0:56:15.719 --> 0:56:19.280
<v Speaker 1>all of these interesting things, but ultimately the main person

0:56:19.280 --> 0:56:22.279
<v Speaker 1>at the center of the story doesn't get any justice.

0:56:22.560 --> 0:56:26.880
<v Speaker 2>No, absolutely not, nor do his family. The reason I

0:56:26.960 --> 0:56:30.839
<v Speaker 2>finished the book by returning to his grave and transcribing

0:56:30.960 --> 0:56:34.520
<v Speaker 2>the headstone inscription on it. It's for his family. It's

0:56:34.560 --> 0:56:37.920
<v Speaker 2>a very sad story. At that point. There's very little

0:56:37.920 --> 0:56:41.120
<v Speaker 2>idea of sort of compensating the victims of crime and

0:56:41.160 --> 0:56:43.680
<v Speaker 2>their families. And the best that is done for him

0:56:44.000 --> 0:56:47.800
<v Speaker 2>is that the railway company decides to instigate a collection

0:56:48.239 --> 0:56:52.280
<v Speaker 2>basically a charitable collection, to raise enough money to ensure

0:56:52.320 --> 0:56:55.439
<v Speaker 2>that his mother, who is an elderly woman, has enough

0:56:55.480 --> 0:56:57.480
<v Speaker 2>to live on for the rest of her life. And

0:56:57.560 --> 0:57:01.200
<v Speaker 2>so this appeal goes out and actually they raise only

0:57:01.239 --> 0:57:03.600
<v Speaker 2>something like two thirds of the targeted amount. I think

0:57:03.640 --> 0:57:05.360
<v Speaker 2>they were trying to raise one hundred pounds, wh should

0:57:05.360 --> 0:57:07.160
<v Speaker 2>be enough to fund an annuity which would give her

0:57:07.160 --> 0:57:09.040
<v Speaker 2>an annual income for the rest of her life. And

0:57:09.080 --> 0:57:11.760
<v Speaker 2>they get only two thirds of the way to that target.

0:57:12.239 --> 0:57:15.880
<v Speaker 2>And a lot of care is taken through official channels

0:57:15.920 --> 0:57:20.160
<v Speaker 2>to make sure that James Spollin's wife, the woman who's

0:57:20.160 --> 0:57:23.480
<v Speaker 2>accused him, is all right, and that she has funds

0:57:23.520 --> 0:57:26.680
<v Speaker 2>to live with her children, and that she's given anonymity

0:57:26.720 --> 0:57:29.560
<v Speaker 2>in a new place to live. And there is absolutely

0:57:29.600 --> 0:57:32.160
<v Speaker 2>no record at all in the papers that I've seen

0:57:32.640 --> 0:57:37.960
<v Speaker 2>that anybody from government even once thought of George Little's family.

0:57:38.280 --> 0:57:40.480
<v Speaker 2>There's no record of a letter, of a visit or

0:57:40.520 --> 0:57:43.800
<v Speaker 2>anything of that nature. It seems that as soon as

0:57:44.000 --> 0:57:58.160
<v Speaker 2>George Little died, the official world just forgot them.

0:57:58.320 --> 0:58:01.200
<v Speaker 1>If you love historical true crimes stories, check out the

0:58:01.240 --> 0:58:04.120
<v Speaker 1>audio versions of my books The Ghost Club, All That

0:58:04.240 --> 0:58:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Is Wicked, and American Sherlock and Don't Forget. There are

0:58:07.560 --> 0:58:11.320
<v Speaker 1>twelve seasons of my historical true crime podcast, Tenfold More

0:58:11.320 --> 0:58:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Wicked right here in this podcast feed, scroll back and

0:58:15.040 --> 0:58:17.800
<v Speaker 1>give them a listen if you haven't already. This has

0:58:17.840 --> 0:58:22.280
<v Speaker 1>been an exactly Right Production. Our senior producer is Alexis M. Morosi.

0:58:22.680 --> 0:58:27.160
<v Speaker 1>Our associate producer is Christina Chamberlain. This episode was mixed

0:58:27.200 --> 0:58:31.080
<v Speaker 1>by John Bradley. Curtis Heath is our composer. Artwork by

0:58:31.240 --> 0:58:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Nick Toga. Executive produced by Georgia Hardstark, Karen Kilgarriff, and

0:58:35.720 --> 0:58:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Danielle Kramer. Follow Wicked Words on Instagram at tenfold More

0:58:40.120 --> 0:58:43.440
<v Speaker 1>Wicked and on Facebook at Wicked Words Pod.