WEBVTT - Anthropic Eyeing Over $900 Billion Valuation

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:12.959
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. Bloomberg Tech is alive

0:00:12.960 --> 0:00:16.800
<v Speaker 1>from coast to coast with Caroline Hyde in New York

0:00:17.079 --> 0:00:19.080
<v Speaker 1>and Vavelow in San Francisco.

0:00:22.040 --> 0:00:23.640
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech coming up.

0:00:23.640 --> 0:00:26.160
<v Speaker 3>All eyes are on a high stakes meeting between President

0:00:26.239 --> 0:00:29.480
<v Speaker 3>Trump and China's Xijing Ting. This is in video CEO

0:00:29.600 --> 0:00:31.960
<v Speaker 3>Jensen Wang gets added to the trip last minute.

0:00:32.080 --> 0:00:32.400
<v Speaker 2>Plus.

0:00:32.440 --> 0:00:35.240
<v Speaker 4>Anthropic is looking to raise at least thirty billion dollars

0:00:35.280 --> 0:00:38.400
<v Speaker 4>in fresh financing, an evaluation of more than nine hundred

0:00:38.440 --> 0:00:40.000
<v Speaker 4>billion dollars and what could be.

0:00:39.960 --> 0:00:41.200
<v Speaker 5>Its largest funding round yet.

0:00:41.280 --> 0:00:44.199
<v Speaker 3>And we speak with Anderill CEO Brian Schimpf as the

0:00:44.240 --> 0:00:47.680
<v Speaker 3>company hits a sixty one billion dollar valuation in its

0:00:47.720 --> 0:00:51.680
<v Speaker 3>latest funding round. Today's big story President Trump's meeting with

0:00:51.920 --> 0:00:55.160
<v Speaker 3>China's Xijingping. And Trump is joined on his trip by

0:00:55.160 --> 0:00:58.320
<v Speaker 3>a host of tech leaders, including in the end in

0:00:58.440 --> 0:01:01.800
<v Speaker 3>video CEO Jensen Wang. As a last minute edition, thrusting

0:01:01.840 --> 0:01:04.600
<v Speaker 3>AI and tech into the spotlight for for the high

0:01:04.640 --> 0:01:07.199
<v Speaker 3>stake summit. Let's bring in bloombergs Tyler Kendall for more.

0:01:07.360 --> 0:01:10.440
<v Speaker 3>Who joins us from Beijing? Set the scene? What do

0:01:10.480 --> 0:01:12.920
<v Speaker 3>we need to know? And my goodness what a fanfare

0:01:13.000 --> 0:01:16.000
<v Speaker 3>last night when Jensen Wang was spotted on the runway

0:01:16.280 --> 0:01:20.600
<v Speaker 3>in Alaska, right.

0:01:20.840 --> 0:01:22.960
<v Speaker 6>Ed, I mean we saw this last minute edition he

0:01:23.080 --> 0:01:26.720
<v Speaker 6>caught Air Force one during a refueling stop in Anchorage. Now,

0:01:26.760 --> 0:01:29.640
<v Speaker 6>the White House says that the addition comes because Jensen

0:01:29.680 --> 0:01:32.240
<v Speaker 6>Wang was able to make a scheduling change that we

0:01:32.280 --> 0:01:34.119
<v Speaker 6>did hear from President Trump in a post on truth

0:01:34.160 --> 0:01:37.080
<v Speaker 6>social where he appeared to be unhappy with media coverage

0:01:37.080 --> 0:01:40.280
<v Speaker 6>that the Nvidia CEO originally wasn't on the manifest of

0:01:40.360 --> 0:01:43.560
<v Speaker 6>travelers that we had in terms of those CEOs that

0:01:43.640 --> 0:01:45.720
<v Speaker 6>are attending now. Of course, the big ticket item I

0:01:45.720 --> 0:01:47.360
<v Speaker 6>don't need to tell either of you would be whether

0:01:47.480 --> 0:01:50.440
<v Speaker 6>or not President Trump pushes the Chinese government to have

0:01:50.520 --> 0:01:54.639
<v Speaker 6>Chinese buyers for the now greenlit h two hundred Nvidia chips.

0:01:54.680 --> 0:01:55.600
<v Speaker 5>So maybe there will be.

0:01:55.560 --> 0:01:58.520
<v Speaker 6>Some sort of discussions around that. I'll also throw on

0:01:58.560 --> 0:02:01.640
<v Speaker 6>your radar that it is our understand that Washington and

0:02:01.720 --> 0:02:05.040
<v Speaker 6>Beijing are in talks about potential cooperation when it comes

0:02:05.040 --> 0:02:08.760
<v Speaker 6>to keeping a dialogue open around artificial intelligence. That could

0:02:08.760 --> 0:02:11.359
<v Speaker 6>be also one of those deliverables that we see out

0:02:11.400 --> 0:02:15.559
<v Speaker 6>of this meeting tomorrow between President Trump and Chinese President Xijingping.

0:02:15.800 --> 0:02:18.760
<v Speaker 6>The administration maintains that they want trade to be the

0:02:18.880 --> 0:02:22.239
<v Speaker 6>top priority here. Just look at the other list of CEOs.

0:02:22.280 --> 0:02:25.480
<v Speaker 6>It is our understanding that they represent some of those

0:02:25.520 --> 0:02:29.000
<v Speaker 6>sectors where we could see some Chinese purchase agreement commitments,

0:02:29.000 --> 0:02:32.120
<v Speaker 6>including the Cargill CEO when it comes to agriculture, and

0:02:32.160 --> 0:02:35.959
<v Speaker 6>the Boeing CEO also being here on the ground in Beijing.

0:02:36.080 --> 0:02:38.560
<v Speaker 6>But at and Carolina at this part, it's hard to

0:02:38.639 --> 0:02:42.600
<v Speaker 6>avoid that Iran will be looming very large over this conversation.

0:02:42.680 --> 0:02:45.720
<v Speaker 6>In fact, a senior administration official who briefed US reporters

0:02:45.720 --> 0:02:48.240
<v Speaker 6>before we headed over here to Asia did say that

0:02:48.280 --> 0:02:50.880
<v Speaker 6>behind closed doors, President Trump is going to push the

0:02:50.960 --> 0:02:53.600
<v Speaker 6>Chinese president when it comes to the country's stance around

0:02:53.680 --> 0:02:56.920
<v Speaker 6>Iran during this conflict, including how Beijing remains the largest

0:02:56.960 --> 0:02:58.560
<v Speaker 6>buyer of Iranian crude.

0:03:00.200 --> 0:03:02.680
<v Speaker 4>Tyler Kendall life in Beijing. We so appreciate it.

0:03:03.040 --> 0:03:03.400
<v Speaker 5>Thank you.

0:03:03.440 --> 0:03:05.239
<v Speaker 4>Look, let's check on the broader markets, because there's a

0:03:05.280 --> 0:03:07.519
<v Speaker 4>volatile trading session. One point, we're in the red on

0:03:07.520 --> 0:03:09.120
<v Speaker 4>the Nazaq one hundred. We're now back in the green.

0:03:09.160 --> 0:03:11.440
<v Speaker 4>We're at about six tens of a percent leading. The

0:03:11.520 --> 0:03:14.280
<v Speaker 4>pack is of course chip makers once again in terms

0:03:14.320 --> 0:03:14.760
<v Speaker 4>of points.

0:03:14.800 --> 0:03:17.120
<v Speaker 5>But I shine a light what's happening in China.

0:03:17.240 --> 0:03:20.400
<v Speaker 4>The Golden Dragon, that is the Nazak Golden Dragon Index,

0:03:20.440 --> 0:03:23.799
<v Speaker 4>which is really basically the trading of Chinese names. Here

0:03:23.800 --> 0:03:25.639
<v Speaker 4>in the US, the ADRs, we're up three and a

0:03:25.680 --> 0:03:28.519
<v Speaker 4>half percent. There is a lot of excitement about what

0:03:28.720 --> 0:03:30.799
<v Speaker 4>one gentsen one could meet for Chinese tech.

0:03:30.880 --> 0:03:32.960
<v Speaker 3>This is really tied to the Nvidia story, and Video

0:03:33.040 --> 0:03:35.560
<v Speaker 3>itself is now up almost three percent and trading at

0:03:35.560 --> 0:03:38.320
<v Speaker 3>a record high, up for a six straight day, matching

0:03:38.360 --> 0:03:40.400
<v Speaker 3>the run it had in early April.

0:03:40.600 --> 0:03:41.760
<v Speaker 2>And the story is really simple.

0:03:41.800 --> 0:03:45.440
<v Speaker 3>A lot of those Chinese AI specific names, Minimax, Gipu,

0:03:45.840 --> 0:03:48.440
<v Speaker 3>the examples, I mean, look at those games. That's astonishing

0:03:48.480 --> 0:03:51.560
<v Speaker 3>overnight on the idea that there might be something here

0:03:51.600 --> 0:03:52.360
<v Speaker 3>that Tyler just.

0:03:52.320 --> 0:03:55.800
<v Speaker 4>Outlined, something here, something certainly for the market to continue

0:03:55.840 --> 0:03:59.600
<v Speaker 4>to chew on as we've just seen relentless exuberant exuberants

0:03:59.640 --> 0:04:02.440
<v Speaker 4>around a Fiona's and condas with US see City Index,

0:04:02.520 --> 0:04:07.120
<v Speaker 4>Financial Markets Senior Analyst and Fiona Is there rationality to

0:04:07.160 --> 0:04:09.280
<v Speaker 4>the moves in the Chinese names on the back of

0:04:09.320 --> 0:04:13.200
<v Speaker 4>hope that they'll get access to more powerful chips. Is

0:04:13.200 --> 0:04:14.680
<v Speaker 4>that something that you're looking to come out of the

0:04:14.680 --> 0:04:17.479
<v Speaker 4>geopolitical event in China, you know.

0:04:17.600 --> 0:04:19.000
<v Speaker 7>Something we've got our eyes on.

0:04:19.240 --> 0:04:21.800
<v Speaker 8>So I think, you know, that would be the absolute

0:04:22.000 --> 0:04:25.360
<v Speaker 8>icing on the cake as far as those stocks are concerned.

0:04:25.400 --> 0:04:27.760
<v Speaker 8>And that's what we're sort of starting to see priced in.

0:04:27.920 --> 0:04:31.680
<v Speaker 8>Is that optimism that that could potentially be on the table.

0:04:31.839 --> 0:04:34.160
<v Speaker 8>I mean, the fact that we saw that later edition

0:04:34.279 --> 0:04:39.159
<v Speaker 8>of Kuwan Jun saying joining the delegation to the US,

0:04:39.200 --> 0:04:41.240
<v Speaker 8>I think has really just sort of been spurred on

0:04:42.320 --> 0:04:45.160
<v Speaker 8>those hopes. And I think there's sort of broad More

0:04:45.200 --> 0:04:47.760
<v Speaker 8>broadly speaking, I think there is just a level of

0:04:47.800 --> 0:04:52.880
<v Speaker 8>excitement surrounding Trump's trip to China, and I think that's

0:04:52.880 --> 0:04:55.520
<v Speaker 8>sort of really evident as we're seeing, you know, the

0:04:55.600 --> 0:04:59.200
<v Speaker 8>Nazak push higher, even though we've got sort of those

0:04:59.600 --> 0:05:04.120
<v Speaker 8>concerns regarding inflation and the sort of fundamental backdrop which

0:05:04.200 --> 0:05:06.880
<v Speaker 8>normally would weigh down the tech index.

0:05:07.760 --> 0:05:11.560
<v Speaker 3>We have been talking about the impact of the latest

0:05:11.600 --> 0:05:13.440
<v Speaker 3>economic data in the markets, but I want to stay

0:05:13.440 --> 0:05:16.839
<v Speaker 3>focused on what's happening in China. How does the market

0:05:16.960 --> 0:05:22.040
<v Speaker 3>interpret and price in this delegation of CEOs that we're

0:05:22.080 --> 0:05:25.040
<v Speaker 3>showing on the screen right now, Tim Cook, Elon Musk,

0:05:25.400 --> 0:05:28.560
<v Speaker 3>Chuck Robbins, and as we've all mentioned, Jensen one with

0:05:28.720 --> 0:05:31.719
<v Speaker 3>the president. What is it the market thinks that does

0:05:33.480 --> 0:05:34.800
<v Speaker 3>this is like the who's who?

0:05:35.000 --> 0:05:40.280
<v Speaker 8>You know, literally the top list of the CEOs from

0:05:40.520 --> 0:05:42.640
<v Speaker 8>the US that you could wish for to go to

0:05:42.680 --> 0:05:48.000
<v Speaker 8>speak to China regarding trade, regarding you know what move

0:05:48.160 --> 0:05:51.640
<v Speaker 8>forward in AI, in chips. I mean, you know, the

0:05:51.720 --> 0:05:56.400
<v Speaker 8>potential for these two economies to actually get sort of

0:05:56.440 --> 0:06:01.800
<v Speaker 8>further agreements surrounding such enormous topics would be massive, And

0:06:01.839 --> 0:06:04.400
<v Speaker 8>I mean, you know, I don't think we can underestimate that.

0:06:04.600 --> 0:06:06.120
<v Speaker 8>I mean, if we just think about sort of you know,

0:06:06.160 --> 0:06:09.320
<v Speaker 8>for example, chips, which you know have been a massive

0:06:09.360 --> 0:06:13.120
<v Speaker 8>part of the story the rally in recent weeks. You know,

0:06:13.200 --> 0:06:15.640
<v Speaker 8>if we think about it, the US is very much

0:06:15.640 --> 0:06:18.920
<v Speaker 8>dominating the sort of the AI computing power at the

0:06:18.920 --> 0:06:21.240
<v Speaker 8>top of the technology set, but at the bottom you've

0:06:21.240 --> 0:06:25.240
<v Speaker 8>got China controlling much of the supply chain critical minerals

0:06:25.279 --> 0:06:29.680
<v Speaker 8>needed to manufacture semmericonductors and advance electronics. So you know,

0:06:29.920 --> 0:06:33.560
<v Speaker 8>if there are these two economies are deeply independent on

0:06:33.600 --> 0:06:36.440
<v Speaker 8>each other. So the more agreements, the more synergies that

0:06:36.480 --> 0:06:38.880
<v Speaker 8>they get together, the better that's going to be.

0:06:40.240 --> 0:06:45.360
<v Speaker 4>Look, we are seeing just the run up in semiconductors

0:06:45.440 --> 0:06:49.039
<v Speaker 4>hardware in particular continue. Even if we took a breath yesterday,

0:06:49.160 --> 0:06:51.360
<v Speaker 4>we're back on and in the green today, Fiona.

0:06:51.440 --> 0:06:53.279
<v Speaker 5>And it's notable that we're waiting.

0:06:53.000 --> 0:06:55.599
<v Speaker 4>An IPO could be priced today, likely to start training

0:06:55.600 --> 0:06:58.800
<v Speaker 4>tomorrow as cerebras. How are you thinking about the appetite

0:06:58.800 --> 0:07:02.200
<v Speaker 4>among your clients to get more exposure, particularly for these

0:07:02.480 --> 0:07:04.200
<v Speaker 4>very AI specific names.

0:07:05.279 --> 0:07:09.640
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, there's been you know, an extremely ramping up of

0:07:09.680 --> 0:07:13.160
<v Speaker 8>demand over the last few weeks. I mean it's definitely

0:07:13.200 --> 0:07:16.440
<v Speaker 8>caught the markets by surprise. I think, you know, we've

0:07:16.480 --> 0:07:20.040
<v Speaker 8>seen that rally come, especially given the fact that we

0:07:20.080 --> 0:07:22.000
<v Speaker 8>did see sort of in a little bit of a

0:07:22.080 --> 0:07:24.880
<v Speaker 8>more depressed outlook towards these stocks at the end of

0:07:24.960 --> 0:07:27.760
<v Speaker 8>last year and the beginning of this year. But you know,

0:07:27.880 --> 0:07:30.480
<v Speaker 8>that has definitely moved forward. We're seeing that our clients

0:07:30.480 --> 0:07:33.480
<v Speaker 8>are really very interested still in their stocks, which is

0:07:33.520 --> 0:07:36.960
<v Speaker 8>interesting because I think technically the position is looking a

0:07:37.000 --> 0:07:39.480
<v Speaker 8>little bit over done, so I think, you know, there

0:07:39.520 --> 0:07:43.200
<v Speaker 8>is room for some consolidation and potentially a pullback here.

0:07:44.120 --> 0:07:48.240
<v Speaker 8>But I think broadly speaking, the longer term trend is

0:07:48.240 --> 0:07:49.560
<v Speaker 8>still looking very positive.

0:07:50.480 --> 0:07:53.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I mean that's the question for me, what happens next?

0:07:53.200 --> 0:07:53.320
<v Speaker 6>Right?

0:07:53.400 --> 0:07:56.360
<v Speaker 3>You know, technology stocks basically are still at record highs

0:07:56.600 --> 0:07:59.560
<v Speaker 3>irrespective of what's happening around the world, So what does

0:07:59.600 --> 0:08:02.320
<v Speaker 3>happen now and why? What is the big swing factor

0:08:02.360 --> 0:08:03.040
<v Speaker 3>in markets for you?

0:08:04.360 --> 0:08:05.040
<v Speaker 7>Yeah? Completely?

0:08:05.120 --> 0:08:07.000
<v Speaker 8>I mean this is what's really interesting, isn't that I

0:08:07.000 --> 0:08:10.360
<v Speaker 8>think is the fundamental backdrop that we have is far

0:08:10.400 --> 0:08:14.160
<v Speaker 8>from ideal. So I think, you know, if we look

0:08:14.200 --> 0:08:17.200
<v Speaker 8>about what could happen next, I mean, supposing we do

0:08:17.320 --> 0:08:19.760
<v Speaker 8>get the reopening of the Straight of horn Moose in

0:08:20.440 --> 0:08:23.320
<v Speaker 8>the coming weeks, that would make the backdrop suddenly much

0:08:23.360 --> 0:08:26.680
<v Speaker 8>more favorable, which potentially could mean there could be more

0:08:26.720 --> 0:08:29.520
<v Speaker 8>gains to be had, not just in AI, not just

0:08:29.560 --> 0:08:30.120
<v Speaker 8>in tech.

0:08:30.000 --> 0:08:31.720
<v Speaker 7>SoCs, but potentially across the board.

0:08:31.960 --> 0:08:34.960
<v Speaker 8>But I think if that doesn't happen, we're still seeing

0:08:35.080 --> 0:08:38.360
<v Speaker 8>this solid demand for tech in AI, and I think

0:08:38.400 --> 0:08:40.400
<v Speaker 8>there is a potential, as I said, for it to slow,

0:08:40.640 --> 0:08:42.920
<v Speaker 8>even for there to be some consolidation or a pullback,

0:08:43.080 --> 0:08:46.559
<v Speaker 8>just given the fact that we are technically so overdone.

0:08:46.559 --> 0:08:48.640
<v Speaker 8>But I think as far as the child is looking,

0:08:48.679 --> 0:08:50.760
<v Speaker 8>there isn't anything on there that's telling us that there

0:08:50.760 --> 0:08:52.439
<v Speaker 8>are reversals.

0:08:52.000 --> 0:08:53.440
<v Speaker 7>Coming anytime soon.

0:08:54.280 --> 0:08:57.480
<v Speaker 8>And so for the time being, the side of least

0:08:57.520 --> 0:08:59.079
<v Speaker 8>redistance does appear to be upwards.

0:09:00.040 --> 0:09:02.640
<v Speaker 4>And is that global Fiona, As we're talking about China,

0:09:02.720 --> 0:09:05.720
<v Speaker 4>we talk about the US, but Europe ASML has been

0:09:05.760 --> 0:09:06.320
<v Speaker 4>a key name.

0:09:06.559 --> 0:09:08.840
<v Speaker 5>We think about what's been happening in Japan, in South.

0:09:08.720 --> 0:09:11.800
<v Speaker 4>Korea, which of course was shaken over the last couple

0:09:11.840 --> 0:09:14.559
<v Speaker 4>of trading days because of talk of maybe some sort

0:09:14.600 --> 0:09:17.520
<v Speaker 4>of citizen dividend and a sharing of the wealth of AI.

0:09:19.040 --> 0:09:19.640
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, that's right.

0:09:19.679 --> 0:09:22.400
<v Speaker 8>I mean the COSB, I think is a really interesting example.

0:09:22.480 --> 0:09:25.000
<v Speaker 8>We've seen the volatility there really come up. I mean

0:09:25.040 --> 0:09:29.040
<v Speaker 8>that had some extremely strong games before we had that pullback.

0:09:29.520 --> 0:09:32.200
<v Speaker 8>But I think that's an interesting point that's being made

0:09:32.240 --> 0:09:35.040
<v Speaker 8>there about the sort of the dividend, the people's dividend.

0:09:34.760 --> 0:09:36.320
<v Speaker 7>On AI, that tax on AI.

0:09:36.600 --> 0:09:40.360
<v Speaker 8>Is that something that could potentially be a risk point

0:09:40.720 --> 0:09:43.040
<v Speaker 8>further down the line more globally. That's something I would

0:09:43.040 --> 0:09:45.480
<v Speaker 8>be watching out for. But I think for now, this

0:09:45.559 --> 0:09:47.640
<v Speaker 8>is a global story that we're looking at as far

0:09:47.679 --> 0:09:51.240
<v Speaker 8>as AI is concerned, and that demand for tech is definitely.

0:09:50.880 --> 0:09:54.480
<v Speaker 3>Back on Fionasenkodo City Index. Great to have you back

0:09:54.520 --> 0:09:57.240
<v Speaker 3>on boombog Tech, Thank you very much. Coming up, we're

0:09:57.280 --> 0:10:00.720
<v Speaker 3>going to speak with anderill Ceobrian Shint. The company hits

0:10:00.720 --> 0:10:04.480
<v Speaker 3>a sixty one billion dollar valuation in its latest funding round.

0:10:04.480 --> 0:10:11.000
<v Speaker 2>That's next. This is Bloomberg Tech. Defense tech start.

0:10:10.800 --> 0:10:13.640
<v Speaker 3>Up Anderil has rocketed to a sixty one billion dollar

0:10:13.760 --> 0:10:16.960
<v Speaker 3>valuation after a fresh five billion dollar raise led by

0:10:17.000 --> 0:10:19.839
<v Speaker 3>Frive Capital and Ndres and Horr. It's almost twice the

0:10:19.920 --> 0:10:23.280
<v Speaker 3>valuation it's said at one year ago. It underscores surging

0:10:23.280 --> 0:10:27.600
<v Speaker 3>investor appetite for AI driven defense tech. Joining us now

0:10:27.720 --> 0:10:30.480
<v Speaker 3>is Andreil CEO, Brian Schimp and Brian. It's good to

0:10:30.480 --> 0:10:32.640
<v Speaker 3>have you back with us on bloom Thank you so much.

0:10:32.679 --> 0:10:33.280
<v Speaker 2>Happy to be here.

0:10:34.559 --> 0:10:36.680
<v Speaker 3>This is confirmation a little bit of what we reported

0:10:36.960 --> 0:10:40.120
<v Speaker 3>about a month couple of months ago. But actually when

0:10:40.160 --> 0:10:41.560
<v Speaker 3>you come on the program, a lot of the questions

0:10:41.559 --> 0:10:43.840
<v Speaker 3>we get for you are operational. So let's take the

0:10:43.880 --> 0:10:46.920
<v Speaker 3>five billion dollars that you've raised, how much of that

0:10:47.040 --> 0:10:50.240
<v Speaker 3>is to get Arsenal one done built and all of

0:10:50.280 --> 0:10:53.880
<v Speaker 3>the other operational timelines that you guys are holding yourselves

0:10:53.920 --> 0:10:55.280
<v Speaker 3>to imminently.

0:10:56.640 --> 0:10:59.319
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, So as a business, you know, we were entering

0:10:59.320 --> 0:11:01.839
<v Speaker 9>this period where production is the name of the game.

0:11:02.480 --> 0:11:05.920
<v Speaker 9>So vast majority of our capital goes to scaling our factories,

0:11:05.920 --> 0:11:09.640
<v Speaker 9>building out our production workforce, funding all that inventory, and

0:11:09.679 --> 0:11:13.040
<v Speaker 9>really just getting that ramp to production working. We're increasing

0:11:13.040 --> 0:11:16.560
<v Speaker 9>production revenue something like two hundred and fifty percent over

0:11:16.600 --> 0:11:18.679
<v Speaker 9>the year, just year over year, So just a huge

0:11:18.760 --> 0:11:20.560
<v Speaker 9>ramp in what we're seeing in terms of demand for

0:11:20.600 --> 0:11:22.520
<v Speaker 9>our technology.

0:11:22.760 --> 0:11:23.200
<v Speaker 7>Demand.

0:11:23.360 --> 0:11:25.960
<v Speaker 5>Talk about it, how much breadth are we seeing.

0:11:25.960 --> 0:11:30.160
<v Speaker 4>The geopolitical conflicts they have sadly increased, and we're still

0:11:30.200 --> 0:11:32.520
<v Speaker 4>seeing this focus on the need for defense tech, but

0:11:32.760 --> 0:11:35.520
<v Speaker 4>we know that the money is often still spent on primes.

0:11:36.600 --> 0:11:39.520
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I mean, look, we are still relatively young as

0:11:39.559 --> 0:11:42.719
<v Speaker 9>a company. We're nine years in. We've been very successful

0:11:43.160 --> 0:11:45.800
<v Speaker 9>by any measure for a company at that age in

0:11:45.840 --> 0:11:50.880
<v Speaker 9>the defense world, and in the fraction of the market

0:11:50.920 --> 0:11:53.640
<v Speaker 9>we're actually addressing right now is still quite small. But

0:11:53.679 --> 0:11:56.000
<v Speaker 9>where we are seeing a lot of demand is particularly

0:11:56.000 --> 0:11:59.120
<v Speaker 9>around things like counter drone and aaron missile defense. That's

0:11:59.160 --> 0:12:02.720
<v Speaker 9>where you look at the conflict. This is a huge issue.

0:12:02.720 --> 0:12:06.920
<v Speaker 9>This is a huge area where we're seeing massive increases

0:12:07.000 --> 0:12:10.720
<v Speaker 9>and what the customers want, you know, our electronic warfare systems,

0:12:10.760 --> 0:12:14.320
<v Speaker 9>our surface their missile systems, and then the other capability

0:12:14.320 --> 0:12:15.960
<v Speaker 9>that we're seeing a lot of demand on that was

0:12:16.160 --> 0:12:19.000
<v Speaker 9>you know, just announced today was a multi year procurement

0:12:19.120 --> 0:12:21.680
<v Speaker 9>of a low cost cruise missile that we call Barracuda.

0:12:22.000 --> 0:12:24.600
<v Speaker 9>The Department is buying, you know, thousands a year of these,

0:12:24.960 --> 0:12:27.520
<v Speaker 9>and we're ramping these at just an unprecedented pace and

0:12:27.559 --> 0:12:30.000
<v Speaker 9>being able to get these out to help with that

0:12:30.120 --> 0:12:34.400
<v Speaker 9>critical munitions shortage and the ability to sustain these conflicts

0:12:34.640 --> 0:12:35.960
<v Speaker 9>and provide the deterrence we need.

0:12:36.920 --> 0:12:38.679
<v Speaker 2>Brian, just humor me on this one.

0:12:38.720 --> 0:12:42.079
<v Speaker 3>The five billion dollars is sufficient to finish Arsenal one

0:12:42.160 --> 0:12:43.679
<v Speaker 3>and start the production ramp.

0:12:45.000 --> 0:12:48.120
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, so we are already ramping production with the money

0:12:48.120 --> 0:12:50.160
<v Speaker 9>we had in the bank. This is really about how

0:12:50.200 --> 0:12:52.920
<v Speaker 9>do we continue to fuel that growth. I don't think

0:12:52.920 --> 0:12:55.720
<v Speaker 9>we're going to see Arsenal one be done anytime soon

0:12:55.760 --> 0:12:58.440
<v Speaker 9>because I think the demand we're going to continue to

0:12:58.440 --> 0:13:00.200
<v Speaker 9>see and the amount we're going to have to new

0:13:00.200 --> 0:13:01.920
<v Speaker 9>new scales just going to ramp and ramp over the

0:13:01.920 --> 0:13:04.280
<v Speaker 9>next several years. This is a good problem to have,

0:13:04.520 --> 0:13:08.559
<v Speaker 9>right and so we benefiting from the private markets and

0:13:08.600 --> 0:13:13.079
<v Speaker 9>the ability to fund these very aggressive ramps. And it's

0:13:13.080 --> 0:13:15.360
<v Speaker 9>a huge testament to you know, the American capital system

0:13:15.360 --> 0:13:17.400
<v Speaker 9>that we can fund these things very, very quickly.

0:13:18.320 --> 0:13:20.600
<v Speaker 3>It was interesting to go through a letter to your

0:13:20.600 --> 0:13:23.199
<v Speaker 3>shareholders he wrote back in January actually and like kind

0:13:23.240 --> 0:13:25.720
<v Speaker 3>of foretelling what was to come in the year. There's

0:13:25.720 --> 0:13:28.720
<v Speaker 3>still a bit of a mistique about Anderill, right, so

0:13:28.720 --> 0:13:31.440
<v Speaker 3>I think Palmer Lucky, one of your co founders, has

0:13:31.440 --> 0:13:34.360
<v Speaker 3>talked about the idea that half of Android's products aren't

0:13:34.400 --> 0:13:38.120
<v Speaker 3>really known about. There's particular interest in the next wave

0:13:38.160 --> 0:13:41.480
<v Speaker 3>of subterrian weapons systems. Could you talk as far as

0:13:41.480 --> 0:13:43.880
<v Speaker 3>you can about where those get built, you know, the

0:13:43.920 --> 0:13:46.760
<v Speaker 3>next phase of life und reill beyond what the initial

0:13:46.760 --> 0:13:47.920
<v Speaker 3>focus of Arsenal one is.

0:13:49.120 --> 0:13:52.640
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, So the purpose of the board letter was layout

0:13:52.679 --> 0:13:55.080
<v Speaker 9>a lot of the you know kind of why of

0:13:55.120 --> 0:13:58.319
<v Speaker 9>what are we doing? What's made us successful is we

0:13:58.360 --> 0:14:01.120
<v Speaker 9>look at, you know, with the SS and technology, the

0:14:01.160 --> 0:14:03.560
<v Speaker 9>shifts and warfare, what are the capabilities that are going

0:14:03.600 --> 0:14:05.560
<v Speaker 9>to be needed over the next five or ten years

0:14:06.200 --> 0:14:09.160
<v Speaker 9>and how can we start to invest to bring those forward.

0:14:09.920 --> 0:14:12.240
<v Speaker 9>So you know, we're working on a whole plethora of

0:14:12.280 --> 0:14:15.560
<v Speaker 9>different products, you know, everything, expanding the air and missile

0:14:15.559 --> 0:14:16.479
<v Speaker 9>defense portfolio.

0:14:16.480 --> 0:14:19.880
<v Speaker 10>We're working on, you know, new domains we're operating in.

0:14:20.360 --> 0:14:23.960
<v Speaker 9>Palmer's always experimenting with the latest and greatest technologies and

0:14:24.000 --> 0:14:26.400
<v Speaker 9>figuring out what you can do that nobody thought possible.

0:14:26.840 --> 0:14:30.760
<v Speaker 9>So we just have a constant source of new ideas

0:14:31.000 --> 0:14:34.280
<v Speaker 9>how technology can apply. But fundamentally, we look at this

0:14:34.360 --> 0:14:38.000
<v Speaker 9>question of what are going to be the dominant technologies

0:14:38.000 --> 0:14:40.520
<v Speaker 9>over the next ten or twenty years. What we're seeing

0:14:40.640 --> 0:14:44.840
<v Speaker 9>in Iran, what we're seeing in Ukraine is that this

0:14:45.000 --> 0:14:48.680
<v Speaker 9>idea of just the sheer volume of munitions that are

0:14:48.720 --> 0:14:52.080
<v Speaker 9>exchange and the need to defend against that. These our

0:14:52.160 --> 0:14:55.720
<v Speaker 9>critical capabilities that in any world will need to be

0:14:55.800 --> 0:14:58.160
<v Speaker 9>solved for. And so a lot of our focus is

0:14:58.200 --> 0:15:00.600
<v Speaker 9>really around these ideas of you know, how do we

0:15:00.680 --> 0:15:05.040
<v Speaker 9>provide the right strike capabilities, the right intelligent targeting capabilities

0:15:05.480 --> 0:15:09.880
<v Speaker 9>and the defense of these as well.

0:15:08.680 --> 0:15:11.400
<v Speaker 5>At the right price. And I'm really interested Bran in.

0:15:11.480 --> 0:15:14.640
<v Speaker 4>Some of these new ideas come from the administration itself,

0:15:14.920 --> 0:15:17.280
<v Speaker 4>and the Golden Dome project is one of those new

0:15:17.280 --> 0:15:21.280
<v Speaker 4>ideas that, according to current budget forecasts coming from the

0:15:21.320 --> 0:15:24.040
<v Speaker 4>Congressional Budget Office, could be up to one point two

0:15:24.160 --> 0:15:27.040
<v Speaker 4>trillion dollars of the ultimate project. Now, I know you're

0:15:27.040 --> 0:15:29.520
<v Speaker 4>among the companies have been awarded initial contracts. Run what

0:15:29.560 --> 0:15:31.320
<v Speaker 4>do you make of how much this could end up

0:15:31.320 --> 0:15:31.920
<v Speaker 4>costing it?

0:15:32.200 --> 0:15:33.240
<v Speaker 5>And it's worth.

0:15:34.680 --> 0:15:37.680
<v Speaker 9>So a lot of those estimates are based off of

0:15:37.720 --> 0:15:40.720
<v Speaker 9>what this would have cost historically, right, and that was

0:15:40.760 --> 0:15:44.560
<v Speaker 9>based around building these things that are extremely expensive and

0:15:44.640 --> 0:15:48.480
<v Speaker 9>extremely exquisite, where you're talking you know, ten twenty thirty

0:15:48.520 --> 0:15:51.640
<v Speaker 9>million dollars a shot to you know, actually provide that

0:15:51.760 --> 0:15:56.160
<v Speaker 9>defense well with commercial technologies, taking a smarter approach, using

0:15:56.200 --> 0:15:59.960
<v Speaker 9>a lot of proven, you know, capabilities that already exist,

0:16:00.000 --> 0:16:03.200
<v Speaker 9>adapting them for this problem, we believe you can get

0:16:03.200 --> 0:16:05.960
<v Speaker 9>this to a much more efficient place and probably even

0:16:06.000 --> 0:16:06.440
<v Speaker 9>more than.

0:16:06.360 --> 0:16:08.680
<v Speaker 10>The price is can you even produce it?

0:16:09.160 --> 0:16:12.000
<v Speaker 9>And today that's one of the major concerns, right, you know,

0:16:12.040 --> 0:16:16.240
<v Speaker 9>we we shot something like a decade of tomahawk production

0:16:16.400 --> 0:16:18.760
<v Speaker 9>in seventy two outs. You know, it's just a crazy

0:16:18.880 --> 0:16:21.320
<v Speaker 9>rate that we're consuming these things, and the ability to

0:16:21.360 --> 0:16:23.640
<v Speaker 9>replenish these becomes a critical issue.

0:16:23.960 --> 0:16:27.320
<v Speaker 10>So our view of this is these are solvable problems.

0:16:27.400 --> 0:16:29.560
<v Speaker 9>You can do it in a more efficient way than

0:16:29.600 --> 0:16:33.720
<v Speaker 9>has been historically executed, and I think that you know,

0:16:34.280 --> 0:16:37.240
<v Speaker 9>being able to execute this at a national scale is

0:16:37.240 --> 0:16:40.560
<v Speaker 9>achievable now in a much more aggressive timeline at a

0:16:40.640 --> 0:16:43.680
<v Speaker 9>much more efficient price than I think people have historically imagined.

0:16:45.040 --> 0:16:47.640
<v Speaker 2>Okay, you get asked this a lot. Palmlucky gets asked

0:16:47.680 --> 0:16:49.520
<v Speaker 2>this a lot. Trey gets asked it a lot.

0:16:50.000 --> 0:16:53.080
<v Speaker 3>But when you do arounded this scale and you look

0:16:53.120 --> 0:16:55.840
<v Speaker 3>at the composition of it, who's not there? People want

0:16:55.880 --> 0:16:58.800
<v Speaker 3>to know about the rationale Forander or going public. Why

0:16:58.840 --> 0:17:01.880
<v Speaker 3>they weren't more crossover investors. You know, this is the

0:17:01.880 --> 0:17:04.080
<v Speaker 3>first time actually, Brian, you, the three of us have

0:17:04.119 --> 0:17:05.879
<v Speaker 3>had to talk in length because when we were with

0:17:05.920 --> 0:17:09.320
<v Speaker 3>you in October, the President made some news about China.

0:17:09.560 --> 0:17:13.120
<v Speaker 3>So just talk us through Brian Shimp's thinking on an

0:17:13.119 --> 0:17:13.959
<v Speaker 3>anderill Ipo.

0:17:15.359 --> 0:17:18.680
<v Speaker 9>So we want to build one of the most pactful

0:17:18.680 --> 0:17:20.959
<v Speaker 9>businesses in the world. Like, that's our goal, right, We

0:17:21.000 --> 0:17:24.720
<v Speaker 9>want to seriously move the needle for the US and

0:17:24.800 --> 0:17:28.240
<v Speaker 9>Allied warfighters, provide the right to terms capabilities, and do

0:17:28.280 --> 0:17:30.800
<v Speaker 9>it at the men's scale, right, That is fundamentally what

0:17:30.840 --> 0:17:35.280
<v Speaker 9>we care about. The rationale for going public is a

0:17:35.280 --> 0:17:37.840
<v Speaker 9>lot less than it used to be. The private capital

0:17:37.920 --> 0:17:40.879
<v Speaker 9>markets have grown in scale, the ability to fund a

0:17:40.920 --> 0:17:43.679
<v Speaker 9>business like ours. You know, when we were doing this

0:17:43.760 --> 0:17:45.800
<v Speaker 9>a few years ago, we were you know, at the

0:17:45.880 --> 0:17:48.159
<v Speaker 9>upper end of what capital raises look like in the

0:17:48.160 --> 0:17:52.119
<v Speaker 9>private market. We are a fraction of an AI fundraised

0:17:52.119 --> 0:17:54.879
<v Speaker 9>at this point, and so the amount of capital that

0:17:54.960 --> 0:17:58.520
<v Speaker 9>is available and it you know, wants to support these

0:17:58.560 --> 0:18:00.720
<v Speaker 9>types of companies is is massive.

0:18:01.400 --> 0:18:03.199
<v Speaker 10>So we're not in a rush to go public, right.

0:18:03.280 --> 0:18:05.800
<v Speaker 9>We don't need to do it from the perspective of

0:18:06.320 --> 0:18:10.440
<v Speaker 9>capital availability or liquidity. You know, we can provide liquidity

0:18:10.480 --> 0:18:14.200
<v Speaker 9>to our early investors, our employees in relatively straightforward ways.

0:18:14.240 --> 0:18:15.520
<v Speaker 10>There's a lot of means to do that.

0:18:16.160 --> 0:18:18.080
<v Speaker 9>So a lot of the historic reasons of why you

0:18:18.160 --> 0:18:21.159
<v Speaker 9>rush to go public don't don't really exist anymore. So

0:18:21.160 --> 0:18:23.680
<v Speaker 9>for us that the question is when does it actually

0:18:23.880 --> 0:18:26.879
<v Speaker 9>make sense? And for us it's you know, we've proven

0:18:26.880 --> 0:18:29.320
<v Speaker 9>that our business model works, we've proven that we can scale,

0:18:30.000 --> 0:18:33.560
<v Speaker 9>and you know, the fundamental economics of the business are

0:18:33.720 --> 0:18:36.960
<v Speaker 9>shown to be, you know, as successful as we want

0:18:36.960 --> 0:18:38.520
<v Speaker 9>to be, you know, a high growth company that can

0:18:38.560 --> 0:18:39.640
<v Speaker 9>operate at high margins.

0:18:40.119 --> 0:18:41.800
<v Speaker 10>That's fundamentally what we want to show.

0:18:41.920 --> 0:18:43.960
<v Speaker 9>And when we feel like we've shown that that's a

0:18:43.960 --> 0:18:45.560
<v Speaker 9>perfectly reasonable time to go public.

0:18:45.960 --> 0:18:47.400
<v Speaker 10>So we're not in any run, We don't have any

0:18:47.400 --> 0:18:48.200
<v Speaker 10>post sure to do it.

0:18:48.040 --> 0:18:53.200
<v Speaker 4>It's great, Yeah, but investors want a stake, particularly retail,

0:18:53.359 --> 0:18:56.000
<v Speaker 4>And I know you've been outspoken about the secondary market.

0:18:56.119 --> 0:18:58.480
<v Speaker 4>Look today and Floppic, I think is yesterday, just put

0:18:58.520 --> 0:19:01.440
<v Speaker 4>out a new blog saying that, Look, there are some

0:19:01.640 --> 0:19:03.879
<v Speaker 4>areas in which Probics seems to be trading on a

0:19:03.920 --> 0:19:07.199
<v Speaker 4>secondary market, and they call them stocks scams. In some

0:19:07.359 --> 0:19:10.320
<v Speaker 4>areas they say it's issuing Fourgulan share certificates in the

0:19:10.320 --> 0:19:12.480
<v Speaker 4>private artificial AI developer.

0:19:12.920 --> 0:19:14.120
<v Speaker 5>Are you warning about that? Still?

0:19:14.119 --> 0:19:17.240
<v Speaker 4>How worried are you about Andreill's shares trading fordulently on

0:19:17.280 --> 0:19:18.160
<v Speaker 4>a secondary market?

0:19:19.119 --> 0:19:22.560
<v Speaker 9>Look, we try to control our cap table tightly and

0:19:22.760 --> 0:19:25.360
<v Speaker 9>make sure that you know everyone investor we have, We

0:19:25.640 --> 0:19:27.520
<v Speaker 9>understand who they are. They're in it for the long haul,

0:19:27.520 --> 0:19:30.520
<v Speaker 9>and they're in it for the right reasons. There's a

0:19:30.520 --> 0:19:35.639
<v Speaker 9>lot of very bad actors that exist trying to, you know,

0:19:35.720 --> 0:19:40.200
<v Speaker 9>hawk things that are not allowed, right, and we've seen

0:19:40.320 --> 0:19:43.960
<v Speaker 9>a lot of prosecutions and other things related to this. Right,

0:19:44.000 --> 0:19:47.320
<v Speaker 9>this is not a new issue, right, And so I

0:19:47.359 --> 0:19:51.560
<v Speaker 9>think there's a problem here. I think the government's respond.

0:19:51.640 --> 0:19:54.240
<v Speaker 4>Can you name the companies, Like, are there any secondary

0:19:54.280 --> 0:19:56.480
<v Speaker 4>market providers you take issue with in particular?

0:19:56.560 --> 0:19:58.719
<v Speaker 5>Sorry, just briefly name names?

0:19:58.760 --> 0:20:02.680
<v Speaker 9>No, I mean, look like the reality is it's mostly

0:20:02.720 --> 0:20:05.520
<v Speaker 9>individual bad actors. Very few of these you know, second

0:20:05.520 --> 0:20:09.840
<v Speaker 9>market brokerages or listing things are inherently the problem. The

0:20:09.960 --> 0:20:13.360
<v Speaker 9>issue is investors, you know, not even investors, these brokers

0:20:13.359 --> 0:20:17.600
<v Speaker 9>misrepresenting what they have access to. And that's not good

0:20:17.640 --> 0:20:19.760
<v Speaker 9>in a public market. It's not good in a private market.

0:20:20.520 --> 0:20:22.880
<v Speaker 9>So the you know, I think it is a problem,

0:20:23.119 --> 0:20:25.879
<v Speaker 9>but you know, it's something that we do everything weekend

0:20:25.960 --> 0:20:27.920
<v Speaker 9>to control and try to help curtail.

0:20:28.359 --> 0:20:30.280
<v Speaker 10>And it's affecting every one of the companies. Who are

0:20:30.600 --> 0:20:32.480
<v Speaker 10>you know, interesting in the private markets.

0:20:33.040 --> 0:20:35.920
<v Speaker 3>Brian, you've been generous to your time before we lose

0:20:36.000 --> 0:20:39.720
<v Speaker 3>you from the program. The President's visit to China, the

0:20:39.760 --> 0:20:42.959
<v Speaker 3>timeline of the threat to Taiwan twenty twenty seven.

0:20:43.440 --> 0:20:44.840
<v Speaker 2>What Danderil's thinking on that.

0:20:45.960 --> 0:20:49.119
<v Speaker 9>Look, diplomacy is good. We're in the deterrence business. We

0:20:49.200 --> 0:20:51.919
<v Speaker 9>do not want there to be a conflict, and I

0:20:51.960 --> 0:20:55.120
<v Speaker 9>think the President going and engaging REGI is a fantastic thing.

0:20:55.400 --> 0:20:58.240
<v Speaker 9>And I'm very excited to see what comes out of this.

0:20:58.600 --> 0:21:02.440
<v Speaker 9>And you know, we're also providing a lot of technology

0:21:02.480 --> 0:21:06.520
<v Speaker 9>to Taiwan, supporting them and every opportunity we can, because

0:21:06.560 --> 0:21:09.080
<v Speaker 9>we believe that they need the right capabilities and to

0:21:09.119 --> 0:21:12.240
<v Speaker 9>have the right deterrence. And you know, the long talked

0:21:12.240 --> 0:21:14.879
<v Speaker 9>about window of twenty twenty seven, kind of the period

0:21:14.920 --> 0:21:17.840
<v Speaker 9>of maximum danger, I think it is true. You know,

0:21:17.880 --> 0:21:20.480
<v Speaker 9>I don't think anyone believes that it was a you know,

0:21:20.600 --> 0:21:25.679
<v Speaker 9>January one, twenty twenty seven and invasion begins, but it

0:21:25.760 --> 0:21:30.280
<v Speaker 9>highlights a period where, you know, kind of the PRC

0:21:30.600 --> 0:21:35.959
<v Speaker 9>has a more established military capability and the US and

0:21:36.000 --> 0:21:40.480
<v Speaker 9>Taiwan at a relative disadvantage compared to other points in time,

0:21:40.600 --> 0:21:43.320
<v Speaker 9>and so it is a period of significant risk. And

0:21:43.480 --> 0:21:46.240
<v Speaker 9>with all of the complexities going on in the world

0:21:46.320 --> 0:21:49.560
<v Speaker 9>with Iran, with Ukraine, you know, with all the other

0:21:49.600 --> 0:21:52.040
<v Speaker 9>areas that are you know, hotspots in the world, it

0:21:52.080 --> 0:21:56.359
<v Speaker 9>creates a significant stress on the US military. So I

0:21:56.400 --> 0:21:59.320
<v Speaker 9>think this is the opportunity for diplomacy is good to

0:21:59.400 --> 0:22:02.040
<v Speaker 9>try to ensure that nothing does happen and try to

0:22:02.080 --> 0:22:05.200
<v Speaker 9>find a scenario that preserves the status quo, that is

0:22:05.240 --> 0:22:08.640
<v Speaker 9>working reasonably well, and that's that's honestly what I hope

0:22:08.680 --> 0:22:09.479
<v Speaker 9>for out of this summit.

0:22:10.560 --> 0:22:14.360
<v Speaker 4>Bran Chef fascinating all things geopolitics, all things you'll raised

0:22:14.359 --> 0:22:16.560
<v Speaker 4>sixty one billion dollar valuation the Andreil CEO.

0:22:16.920 --> 0:22:18.359
<v Speaker 5>We so appreciate your time today.

0:22:19.160 --> 0:22:22.560
<v Speaker 4>Now it's expected to be the final day of evidence

0:22:22.640 --> 0:22:24.600
<v Speaker 4>in the closely watched trial between Elon.

0:22:24.400 --> 0:22:27.200
<v Speaker 5>Musk and open Ai. Yesterday, Sam Altman.

0:22:27.000 --> 0:22:31.240
<v Speaker 4>Told jurors he was quote extremely uncomfortable with Musk's insistence

0:22:31.400 --> 0:22:33.840
<v Speaker 4>on having full control of the startup in its early days.

0:22:34.000 --> 0:22:36.000
<v Speaker 4>Mask You're a member is suing open Ai, his former

0:22:36.000 --> 0:22:39.240
<v Speaker 4>co founders, and Microsoft, alleging that they abandoned the chatchebt

0:22:39.400 --> 0:22:44.000
<v Speaker 4>maker's altruistic mission. Let's get more with Bloomberg AI editor

0:22:44.040 --> 0:22:47.720
<v Speaker 4>Seth Figgerman. So what seems to have transpired, what's being

0:22:47.800 --> 0:22:50.159
<v Speaker 4>articulated by Sam Altman is that at some point in

0:22:50.280 --> 0:22:53.560
<v Speaker 4>al Musk actually was thinking about a profit side of it,

0:22:53.760 --> 0:22:57.199
<v Speaker 4>thinking about trying to earn control, and indeed was then

0:22:57.240 --> 0:22:59.760
<v Speaker 4>thinking bequeathing it to his children if he died, right.

0:23:00.160 --> 0:23:02.560
<v Speaker 11>As one does. Yeah, a little bit of dramatic testimony there.

0:23:02.680 --> 0:23:05.920
<v Speaker 11>So much of o'pennie's counter argument to Musk claims here

0:23:06.000 --> 0:23:08.719
<v Speaker 11>is that really his frustration is that he was not

0:23:08.800 --> 0:23:12.159
<v Speaker 11>able to control and be CEO of Opennie and the

0:23:12.200 --> 0:23:13.600
<v Speaker 11>way that he is with all his other ventures. And

0:23:13.600 --> 0:23:16.800
<v Speaker 11>so Sam Alman recounted a conversation with Musk where he

0:23:16.840 --> 0:23:19.960
<v Speaker 11>allegedly said that you know, if and when he were

0:23:20.040 --> 0:23:21.720
<v Speaker 11>to die and he was in control of Opennie, he

0:23:21.720 --> 0:23:25.080
<v Speaker 11>would pass it along to his children. Now you know

0:23:25.160 --> 0:23:29.000
<v Speaker 11>that's openiey saying it, but also said that, you know,

0:23:29.240 --> 0:23:32.960
<v Speaker 11>Musk wanted control in the early days, but wasn't really

0:23:32.960 --> 0:23:36.159
<v Speaker 11>willing to sign documentations saying that control would lift at

0:23:36.160 --> 0:23:38.760
<v Speaker 11>some point. In his own testimony, Musk has said, yeah,

0:23:38.800 --> 0:23:41.000
<v Speaker 11>he might have had control early on, but the expectation

0:23:41.160 --> 0:23:43.800
<v Speaker 11>was more investors would come in and eventually he wouldn't

0:23:43.800 --> 0:23:46.240
<v Speaker 11>have that same level of control and.

0:23:46.359 --> 0:23:48.760
<v Speaker 5>Beg Seth Figerman. We so appreciate the round up. We

0:23:48.840 --> 0:23:49.960
<v Speaker 5>have some breaking.

0:23:49.600 --> 0:23:52.439
<v Speaker 4>News though that we must hit because crossing the terminal

0:23:52.520 --> 0:23:57.080
<v Speaker 4>right now, ARM and its majority owner soft Bank reportedly

0:23:57.160 --> 0:24:00.480
<v Speaker 4>tried to buy Cerebrus in an evenly split cash and

0:24:00.480 --> 0:24:03.040
<v Speaker 4>stock deal that would have valued the upstart at one

0:24:03.119 --> 0:24:06.080
<v Speaker 4>hundred billion dollars. According to sources, This all happened weeks

0:24:06.119 --> 0:24:08.560
<v Speaker 4>before the chip maker was due to make its public debut.

0:24:08.600 --> 0:24:11.919
<v Speaker 4>Of course, the person who's been busy breaking that story

0:24:11.960 --> 0:24:14.480
<v Speaker 4>and also come anchoring the show on air is one

0:24:14.680 --> 0:24:17.359
<v Speaker 4>Ed Ludlow. Talk us through it as to this was

0:24:17.600 --> 0:24:19.600
<v Speaker 4>happening in the background during May.

0:24:20.040 --> 0:24:23.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, look, Cerebras is going to list tomorrow, right, and

0:24:23.040 --> 0:24:25.480
<v Speaker 3>this happened at the beginning of May. They very clearly

0:24:25.520 --> 0:24:28.680
<v Speaker 3>said no, we're not interested. But ARM and soft Bank,

0:24:28.720 --> 0:24:31.879
<v Speaker 3>which majority owns ARM, tried why very interesting. We can

0:24:31.880 --> 0:24:33.320
<v Speaker 3>get into it in the back half of the show

0:24:33.800 --> 0:24:35.480
<v Speaker 3>because there's a lot more to come on Bloomberg Tech.

0:24:41.760 --> 0:24:43.639
<v Speaker 3>Welcome back to Bloomberg Tech. Let's get back to that

0:24:43.680 --> 0:24:46.600
<v Speaker 3>news that broke just a few moments ago. ARM and

0:24:46.640 --> 0:24:50.200
<v Speaker 3>its majority own a soft Bank tried to buy Cerebras.

0:24:50.200 --> 0:24:51.520
<v Speaker 2>That's according to sources.

0:24:51.880 --> 0:24:54.359
<v Speaker 3>My understanding is this all happened in the last couple

0:24:54.359 --> 0:24:57.800
<v Speaker 3>of weeks, early May, and it's just before Cerebras, the

0:24:57.840 --> 0:25:02.959
<v Speaker 3>chip maker is Judo public day. They were robuffed, you know,

0:25:03.040 --> 0:25:06.080
<v Speaker 3>Cerebras said no. My understand is and understanding his ARM

0:25:06.080 --> 0:25:09.320
<v Speaker 3>and soft Bank would have happily paid a premium, big premium,

0:25:09.440 --> 0:25:13.760
<v Speaker 3>but Cerebras backs itself, and its leadership back backs them,

0:25:14.240 --> 0:25:16.679
<v Speaker 3>and the investors backed them to do this alone as

0:25:16.720 --> 0:25:17.879
<v Speaker 3>a public company.

0:25:17.920 --> 0:25:20.080
<v Speaker 4>I mean, look at the demand for its IPO looks

0:25:20.080 --> 0:25:21.639
<v Speaker 4>going to be pricing today. We understand that it's going

0:25:21.720 --> 0:25:23.400
<v Speaker 4>to price at the top end of the marketed range

0:25:23.440 --> 0:25:25.400
<v Speaker 4>up to one hundred and sixty dollars plus.

0:25:25.760 --> 0:25:27.760
<v Speaker 5>We're seeing maybe the biggest.

0:25:27.359 --> 0:25:30.639
<v Speaker 4>Amount raised in a semiconductor.

0:25:29.960 --> 0:25:32.439
<v Speaker 5>Name since ARM went public. Maybe even more of the

0:25:32.480 --> 0:25:33.840
<v Speaker 5>green shoe allotment is used.

0:25:34.000 --> 0:25:36.520
<v Speaker 4>But why would ARM and Cerebras have been sort of

0:25:36.560 --> 0:25:37.760
<v Speaker 4>a useful synergy here?

0:25:37.880 --> 0:25:40.160
<v Speaker 3>Well, because you know, ARM goes from being a chip

0:25:40.160 --> 0:25:42.920
<v Speaker 3>designer to wanting to be a chip maker like actually

0:25:42.960 --> 0:25:45.959
<v Speaker 3>sell directly into the market, and Cerebras this in this

0:25:46.000 --> 0:25:49.720
<v Speaker 3>phase of inference in AI the broader infrastructure play it

0:25:49.760 --> 0:25:52.680
<v Speaker 3>backs itself as well. Anyway, I should just probably note

0:25:52.720 --> 0:25:55.439
<v Speaker 3>that all of the parties involved declined to comment or

0:25:55.440 --> 0:25:58.200
<v Speaker 3>did not immediately respond to comment to Bloomberg. We should

0:25:58.240 --> 0:26:00.560
<v Speaker 3>check in on our markets, because markets being than by

0:26:00.560 --> 0:26:03.960
<v Speaker 3>what's happening in Beijing. Then, as that one hundred modestly

0:26:04.000 --> 0:26:07.399
<v Speaker 3>higher four tenths percent US listed Chinese companies that's the

0:26:07.760 --> 0:26:10.320
<v Speaker 3>Golden Dragon China Index up four percent.

0:26:10.440 --> 0:26:13.080
<v Speaker 2>A big part of this is in Nvidia.

0:26:13.280 --> 0:26:17.400
<v Speaker 3>Shares of Chinese AI model developers in particular surged after

0:26:17.440 --> 0:26:20.280
<v Speaker 3>in video CEO Jensen Wang was announced to be joining

0:26:20.320 --> 0:26:23.480
<v Speaker 3>President Trump's China trip. Shares of Minimax and GPU on

0:26:23.560 --> 0:26:28.320
<v Speaker 3>the hopes of progress on Nvidia's ability to sell chips

0:26:28.359 --> 0:26:32.880
<v Speaker 3>into China. Look at those gains overnight Bloomberg's Chinese Equities report.

0:26:32.960 --> 0:26:35.840
<v Speaker 3>Henry Renn is with us. Henry, look at those gains overnight.

0:26:35.880 --> 0:26:38.560
<v Speaker 3>I mean the response in Asia trading was interesting.

0:26:39.880 --> 0:26:40.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's right.

0:26:40.680 --> 0:26:44.679
<v Speaker 12>So the last minute trip by Jensen Vana's boasting the

0:26:44.720 --> 0:26:48.199
<v Speaker 12>morale of mainland traders. We're seeing double digit gains in

0:26:48.240 --> 0:26:50.960
<v Speaker 12>the likes of Tupol and Minima Access well the Chinese

0:26:50.960 --> 0:26:54.200
<v Speaker 12>model makers, but not limited to that. That has obviously

0:26:54.240 --> 0:26:58.639
<v Speaker 12>spread to today's US trading session as well. We see Ali, Baba, JD,

0:26:58.760 --> 0:27:01.880
<v Speaker 12>the likes of those Chinese tech names also trading hire

0:27:01.960 --> 0:27:05.040
<v Speaker 12>in mainland session. We have the Chinax Index, which is

0:27:05.119 --> 0:27:09.320
<v Speaker 12>China's equivalent of Nasdaq for those young tech companies also

0:27:09.440 --> 0:27:12.160
<v Speaker 12>soaring to a record. So there are some optimism that

0:27:12.240 --> 0:27:15.439
<v Speaker 12>China and US could strike some form of deals on

0:27:15.520 --> 0:27:20.480
<v Speaker 12>chip x sports. And remember that Nvidia has gained approval

0:27:20.520 --> 0:27:24.160
<v Speaker 12>from Washington to sell h two hundred chips into China

0:27:24.400 --> 0:27:25.280
<v Speaker 12>since end.

0:27:25.200 --> 0:27:25.960
<v Speaker 2>Of last year.

0:27:26.040 --> 0:27:28.360
<v Speaker 12>But still that there are some hopes that for more

0:27:28.400 --> 0:27:30.520
<v Speaker 12>powerful models can be used.

0:27:31.600 --> 0:27:33.879
<v Speaker 4>Really interesting that you bring up Ali Baba because actually

0:27:33.920 --> 0:27:37.399
<v Speaker 4>Ali Baba Tencent, they gave us fundamentals as well.

0:27:37.480 --> 0:27:39.080
<v Speaker 5>They came out with their earnings.

0:27:38.680 --> 0:27:42.080
<v Speaker 4>And thus far they're investing a ton, but the return

0:27:42.160 --> 0:27:45.080
<v Speaker 4>on that investment from AI investment just doesn't seem to

0:27:45.119 --> 0:27:45.680
<v Speaker 4>be there yet.

0:27:46.800 --> 0:27:49.760
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, that's the huge issue that the market is focusing

0:27:49.800 --> 0:27:53.520
<v Speaker 12>on today with both company reporting results, so probably we

0:27:53.560 --> 0:27:56.439
<v Speaker 12>can start from Ali Baba. So the company, I think

0:27:57.000 --> 0:28:00.880
<v Speaker 12>it does reassure investors because it's said it's cloud revenue

0:28:00.880 --> 0:28:04.000
<v Speaker 12>grew by about forty percent in the first quarter, and

0:28:04.040 --> 0:28:07.000
<v Speaker 12>that's the key number that market has been focusing on.

0:28:07.280 --> 0:28:08.680
<v Speaker 2>That's an acceleration from.

0:28:08.480 --> 0:28:11.679
<v Speaker 12>The quarter earlier, so it does show that there are

0:28:11.680 --> 0:28:14.760
<v Speaker 12>some AI trajectory going on. And in the meantime, it's

0:28:14.800 --> 0:28:18.240
<v Speaker 12>also saying that for its AI related revenue related to

0:28:18.320 --> 0:28:21.640
<v Speaker 12>its models as well as application services, that will reach

0:28:21.680 --> 0:28:26.280
<v Speaker 12>about one hundred ten billion R and B for the

0:28:26.359 --> 0:28:31.320
<v Speaker 12>June quarter, so that's a helpful additional disclosure as well.

0:28:31.520 --> 0:28:33.800
<v Speaker 12>So it does show some AI momentum, but at the

0:28:33.800 --> 0:28:38.960
<v Speaker 12>same time that Capex has been soaring as you mentioned, Yeah.

0:28:38.760 --> 0:28:40.520
<v Speaker 4>I mean while ten Cent reported this last place of

0:28:40.560 --> 0:28:43.160
<v Speaker 4>revenue growth in over a year. Henry Rens always great

0:28:43.160 --> 0:28:44.760
<v Speaker 4>to catch up with you and the latest and all

0:28:44.760 --> 0:28:47.480
<v Speaker 4>things China and AI. But now let's take a look

0:28:47.480 --> 0:28:50.880
<v Speaker 4>at today's big number. It's around AI and it's over

0:28:51.160 --> 0:28:55.120
<v Speaker 4>nine hundred billion dollars. This is Athropits targeted new valuation,

0:28:55.520 --> 0:28:57.640
<v Speaker 4>according to sources who say the company is in early

0:28:57.640 --> 0:28:59.800
<v Speaker 4>talks with investors to raise at least thirty billion dollars

0:29:00.040 --> 0:29:02.920
<v Speaker 4>lush financing. It could set the stage what maybe the

0:29:03.000 --> 0:29:05.440
<v Speaker 4>largest funding round yet for the company, though the deal

0:29:05.760 --> 0:29:08.280
<v Speaker 4>it's not been finalized, no term sheet has been signed.

0:29:08.360 --> 0:29:11.240
<v Speaker 4>Natasha Mascarenes, who joins us now, who helped break this

0:29:11.320 --> 0:29:14.000
<v Speaker 4>story alongside Ed and just tell us a little bit

0:29:14.040 --> 0:29:17.240
<v Speaker 4>about the inbounds, almost the love letters they've been receiving

0:29:17.280 --> 0:29:18.640
<v Speaker 4>from potential investors.

0:29:18.760 --> 0:29:20.760
<v Speaker 13>It's a great way to describe it, Caroline. I mean,

0:29:21.080 --> 0:29:23.680
<v Speaker 13>a few weeks ago, these were conversations that were coming

0:29:23.760 --> 0:29:28.800
<v Speaker 13>completely unsolicited from Anthropics backers. Now we have reporting that

0:29:29.080 --> 0:29:32.640
<v Speaker 13>they are engaging in those conversations and discussing around that

0:29:32.680 --> 0:29:35.920
<v Speaker 13>could see them raise at least thirty billion, and sources

0:29:35.920 --> 0:29:37.840
<v Speaker 13>are telling us that the round could close as soon

0:29:37.880 --> 0:29:40.080
<v Speaker 13>as the end of this month. It's one that we're

0:29:40.120 --> 0:29:42.880
<v Speaker 13>tracking very closely and definitely the biggest update we've had

0:29:42.920 --> 0:29:46.520
<v Speaker 13>on the round throughout this circus of interest.

0:29:47.880 --> 0:29:50.680
<v Speaker 3>You know, the private markets are alive, you know, to

0:29:50.720 --> 0:29:53.200
<v Speaker 3>put it mildly, and it's interesting this Hasha that you know,

0:29:53.200 --> 0:29:56.960
<v Speaker 3>Anthropic feels comfortable now with this valuation here. We've gone

0:29:57.000 --> 0:29:59.440
<v Speaker 3>from a place in just the last two or three

0:29:59.440 --> 0:30:02.160
<v Speaker 3>weeks where they a rebuffed office and now you know,

0:30:02.200 --> 0:30:05.200
<v Speaker 3>we don't want to do this. But the main thing

0:30:05.200 --> 0:30:07.760
<v Speaker 3>that's happened in the interim is that Claude continues to

0:30:07.800 --> 0:30:11.200
<v Speaker 3>have Amnum enterprise adoption of Enthropic, and then there's the

0:30:11.240 --> 0:30:16.200
<v Speaker 3>Mefos government angle give us the sort of awkward elephant

0:30:16.200 --> 0:30:18.400
<v Speaker 3>in the room, which is that if they close this round,

0:30:18.960 --> 0:30:20.920
<v Speaker 3>they will have evaluation higher than open AI.

0:30:21.960 --> 0:30:22.640
<v Speaker 5>Absolutely.

0:30:22.680 --> 0:30:26.880
<v Speaker 13>I mean, this is a massive narrative shift around Anthropic

0:30:26.920 --> 0:30:30.200
<v Speaker 13>and we've been covering it relentlessly. Our understanding is that

0:30:30.240 --> 0:30:33.720
<v Speaker 13>the investor interest far exceeds how much Anthropic will actually

0:30:33.840 --> 0:30:37.120
<v Speaker 13>end up accepting from investors, and so you are seeing

0:30:37.160 --> 0:30:39.120
<v Speaker 13>them maybe be picky on valuation.

0:30:39.480 --> 0:30:40.200
<v Speaker 5>Lead investor.

0:30:40.280 --> 0:30:42.800
<v Speaker 13>The term shit is not officially signed as of our

0:30:42.840 --> 0:30:45.360
<v Speaker 13>reporting last evening, but we do expect that to change,

0:30:45.520 --> 0:30:48.320
<v Speaker 13>you know, as fast as we're able to confirm it.

0:30:48.360 --> 0:30:51.000
<v Speaker 13>And so the real question and what we're looking at

0:30:51.040 --> 0:30:53.920
<v Speaker 13>next is, let's say Anthropic closes us around as per

0:30:53.920 --> 0:30:55.800
<v Speaker 13>our sources as soon as the end of this month.

0:30:56.160 --> 0:30:59.200
<v Speaker 13>Does this change their IPO timeline? Does it need to

0:30:59.280 --> 0:31:02.160
<v Speaker 13>change their IPO timeline? I mean, you guys just had

0:31:02.200 --> 0:31:04.480
<v Speaker 13>Brian Schimp from Andral on the show who was saying

0:31:04.520 --> 0:31:07.560
<v Speaker 13>that Andreol was raising just a quarter of what AAI

0:31:07.680 --> 0:31:10.520
<v Speaker 13>financing is. I'm curious what you think ed about if this,

0:31:10.640 --> 0:31:13.720
<v Speaker 13>does you know, change when we see the sprite officially

0:31:13.720 --> 0:31:15.320
<v Speaker 13>filed for Ananthropic, Well.

0:31:15.240 --> 0:31:17.760
<v Speaker 3>It depends what happens with SpaceX June July. Does that

0:31:17.800 --> 0:31:20.120
<v Speaker 3>sock Oxygen out of the room. But again, if the

0:31:20.160 --> 0:31:23.800
<v Speaker 3>private markets provide, what's the need to go public? Bloombasin

0:31:23.840 --> 0:31:27.240
<v Speaker 3>Tash Mascaranus teaming up on another big twist and turn

0:31:27.280 --> 0:31:29.680
<v Speaker 3>in the Anthropic story.

0:31:30.760 --> 0:31:34.440
<v Speaker 4>Some breaking news regarding Misral, the AI giant of France

0:31:34.560 --> 0:31:38.320
<v Speaker 4>is apparently developing a new AI model for banks who

0:31:38.400 --> 0:31:42.760
<v Speaker 4>lack access to Mythos. This is all about cybersecurity vulnerabilities. Already,

0:31:43.080 --> 0:31:46.560
<v Speaker 4>Mistral of France had been working with local European banks

0:31:46.840 --> 0:31:49.560
<v Speaker 4>to have a new model that would stress test cyber

0:31:49.640 --> 0:31:52.880
<v Speaker 4>risks around the banks and more broadly in their systems.

0:31:53.000 --> 0:31:54.719
<v Speaker 4>When now we understand those banks of course have been

0:31:54.720 --> 0:31:58.080
<v Speaker 4>wanting access to Mythos, and now Mistral is looking to

0:31:58.200 --> 0:32:01.800
<v Speaker 4>develop this new model that can uncover cybersecurity vulnerabilities at

0:32:01.880 --> 0:32:05.040
<v Speaker 4>unprecedented speed and ScaleOut reporting.

0:32:05.080 --> 0:32:06.640
<v Speaker 2>All according to Bloomberg's sources.

0:32:06.680 --> 0:32:10.240
<v Speaker 3>Okay, Varda Space is planning to send medicines from United

0:32:10.280 --> 0:32:14.040
<v Speaker 3>Therapeutics into orbit to explore the use of microgravity in

0:32:14.120 --> 0:32:15.040
<v Speaker 3>creating drugs.

0:32:15.080 --> 0:32:17.400
<v Speaker 2>It's one of the first commercial.

0:32:16.800 --> 0:32:20.200
<v Speaker 3>Research deals to develop medicine molecules in space and then

0:32:20.280 --> 0:32:22.560
<v Speaker 3>return them to Earth. That the mission still in its

0:32:22.560 --> 0:32:25.080
<v Speaker 3>early stages. I speak with Varda CEO Will Brewy. Let's

0:32:25.120 --> 0:32:27.920
<v Speaker 3>talk timeline. This is exciting development for you guys because

0:32:27.920 --> 0:32:31.840
<v Speaker 3>it's a real commercial opportunity. When does it happen? What

0:32:31.880 --> 0:32:34.000
<v Speaker 3>are the steps to start working with United.

0:32:34.080 --> 0:32:36.480
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, thanks for having me ed. It's happening now, which

0:32:36.560 --> 0:32:38.720
<v Speaker 14>is really exciting. The research has been done for decades

0:32:38.760 --> 0:32:41.080
<v Speaker 14>and so now we're moving into the commercial phase. VARDA

0:32:41.120 --> 0:32:44.200
<v Speaker 14>has been flying for years, and so this commercial endeavor

0:32:44.240 --> 0:32:46.520
<v Speaker 14>will be putting drugs into space in the next year.

0:32:46.600 --> 0:32:48.240
<v Speaker 14>We're working on those drugs right now in the lab

0:32:48.280 --> 0:32:48.840
<v Speaker 14>with United.

0:32:49.360 --> 0:32:52.400
<v Speaker 4>And when they're in space, what are you hoping to prove?

0:32:52.440 --> 0:32:54.479
<v Speaker 5>What are you hoping to see? Where does this drive United?

0:32:54.800 --> 0:32:57.200
<v Speaker 14>So the most confusing thing about VARDA is the space part.

0:32:57.240 --> 0:32:59.520
<v Speaker 14>If you just imagine we had an anti gravity technically,

0:32:59.560 --> 0:33:00.000
<v Speaker 14>admit it.

0:33:00.120 --> 0:33:02.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, if you imagine.

0:33:01.880 --> 0:33:04.640
<v Speaker 14>We had an anti gravity technology where we could manipulate

0:33:04.680 --> 0:33:07.320
<v Speaker 14>chemical systems on Earth to improve formulations in a way

0:33:07.360 --> 0:33:10.080
<v Speaker 14>that would otherwise be impossible. And by formulation I mean

0:33:10.120 --> 0:33:11.880
<v Speaker 14>going from like an IV bag to a shot or

0:33:11.960 --> 0:33:15.600
<v Speaker 14>better bioavailability. Then it would make total sense. Now is

0:33:15.600 --> 0:33:17.960
<v Speaker 14>shipping the space is becoming just shipping. We can access

0:33:18.000 --> 0:33:19.880
<v Speaker 14>microgravity in a way that helps patients.

0:33:19.880 --> 0:33:23.160
<v Speaker 3>Today, I've had the opportunity to sort of interact with

0:33:23.280 --> 0:33:25.160
<v Speaker 3>I don't know you called it a spacecraft or if

0:33:25.200 --> 0:33:29.240
<v Speaker 3>you call it a minifactory, but just go through the

0:33:29.240 --> 0:33:32.440
<v Speaker 3>basics of who's the launch provider, what happens when you

0:33:32.440 --> 0:33:34.200
<v Speaker 3>get into low Earth all a bit? And then how

0:33:34.280 --> 0:33:37.239
<v Speaker 3>long typically is the spacecraft will capsule in all bit?

0:33:37.400 --> 0:33:39.160
<v Speaker 14>Sure, So I'll even step back just because we're so

0:33:39.200 --> 0:33:41.920
<v Speaker 14>excited about this United announcement today. First, we work with

0:33:42.000 --> 0:33:44.200
<v Speaker 14>the customers before we even get there, and we develop

0:33:44.240 --> 0:33:47.440
<v Speaker 14>a microgravity enabled formulation on the ground in our lab

0:33:47.640 --> 0:33:51.680
<v Speaker 14>in cooperation and partnership with United. Once those microgravity enabled

0:33:51.680 --> 0:33:54.000
<v Speaker 14>formulations are ready for flight, what does that.

0:33:53.960 --> 0:33:55.960
<v Speaker 5>Look like like gravity enabled formula?

0:33:56.080 --> 0:33:59.560
<v Speaker 14>It means that the temperature, profile, the concentration, all the

0:33:59.560 --> 0:34:02.800
<v Speaker 14>parameter that would go into any other drug formulation now

0:34:03.000 --> 0:34:06.040
<v Speaker 14>has the option of turning off gravity during the process,

0:34:06.080 --> 0:34:08.120
<v Speaker 14>which means we can make a new outcome for patients.

0:34:08.440 --> 0:34:10.600
<v Speaker 14>So then what we do is, once we have that formulation,

0:34:10.680 --> 0:34:13.400
<v Speaker 14>we load it into our spacecraft. Our launch provider is SpaceX.

0:34:13.400 --> 0:34:16.200
<v Speaker 14>We launch put our spacecraft onto a Falcon nine rocket

0:34:16.280 --> 0:34:19.480
<v Speaker 14>dedicated rideshare, which is great because now we get to

0:34:19.480 --> 0:34:22.640
<v Speaker 14>take advantage of good costs and frequent availability to space.

0:34:22.880 --> 0:34:25.120
<v Speaker 14>So now the spacecraft separates from the rocket like it

0:34:25.120 --> 0:34:27.920
<v Speaker 14>would any other satellite, So it looks like a satellite

0:34:27.920 --> 0:34:29.840
<v Speaker 14>to SpaceX. You can fit twenty of these things on

0:34:29.880 --> 0:34:32.400
<v Speaker 14>a single rocket. It's now orbiting the Earth. We do

0:34:32.520 --> 0:34:35.920
<v Speaker 14>the manufacturing process where there isn't gravity affecting the sedimentation

0:34:36.000 --> 0:34:38.520
<v Speaker 14>of the crystals, and then once those properties are locked in,

0:34:38.640 --> 0:34:41.640
<v Speaker 14>our spacecraft flies itself back to earth lands in Australia.

0:34:41.680 --> 0:34:43.040
<v Speaker 14>And now we have the drug for patients.

0:34:43.600 --> 0:34:45.440
<v Speaker 5>And what does it help patients with?

0:34:45.600 --> 0:34:47.959
<v Speaker 4>I mean, how is this going to unleash a whole

0:34:48.000 --> 0:34:49.719
<v Speaker 4>new area of medicine.

0:34:49.760 --> 0:34:52.280
<v Speaker 14>It's wild because it's gravity is a fundamental force of physics,

0:34:52.360 --> 0:34:56.759
<v Speaker 14>so it's extremely broad technology, anything from bioavailability to shelf stability.

0:34:56.920 --> 0:34:59.239
<v Speaker 14>A classic example that was flown on the International Space

0:34:59.239 --> 0:35:01.359
<v Speaker 14>Station was going for from an IV bag to a shot.

0:35:01.480 --> 0:35:04.560
<v Speaker 14>So imagine you're in rural America and you don't have

0:35:04.680 --> 0:35:06.960
<v Speaker 14>access to a clinic. You now have access to the

0:35:07.000 --> 0:35:09.719
<v Speaker 14>drug because that same drug can be form factored into

0:35:09.760 --> 0:35:11.600
<v Speaker 14>a shot instead of an IV bag, and that shot

0:35:11.640 --> 0:35:12.480
<v Speaker 14>can come to you instead of.

0:35:12.480 --> 0:35:13.440
<v Speaker 2>You having to go to the clinic.

0:35:13.680 --> 0:35:16.560
<v Speaker 3>We're showing images right, this is images of vod of

0:35:16.600 --> 0:35:20.200
<v Speaker 3>returning to Earth. So this sounds ridiculous, and I'll say

0:35:20.200 --> 0:35:24.800
<v Speaker 3>it anyway. You try and land in Australia. That seems

0:35:24.880 --> 0:35:28.319
<v Speaker 3>quite easy. Australia is quite big. Actually it's not. How

0:35:28.360 --> 0:35:31.560
<v Speaker 3>restrictive is that that landing pad of it of one

0:35:31.680 --> 0:35:32.600
<v Speaker 3>continental nation?

0:35:32.840 --> 0:35:34.719
<v Speaker 14>Yes, yes, so more than try. I mean we've done

0:35:34.760 --> 0:35:37.719
<v Speaker 14>this now four or five times. And the reason I

0:35:37.719 --> 0:35:39.120
<v Speaker 14>say four or five one of them was in Utah

0:35:39.239 --> 0:35:40.400
<v Speaker 14>and the rest were in Australia.

0:35:40.480 --> 0:35:42.160
<v Speaker 2>But that go in Utah. Oh, it was great.

0:35:42.200 --> 0:35:44.120
<v Speaker 14>I mean, you know mission that was our first mission success.

0:35:44.400 --> 0:35:45.439
<v Speaker 2>See. Yeah.

0:35:45.600 --> 0:35:48.160
<v Speaker 14>The thing that's nice about Australia is it's a commercial range,

0:35:48.160 --> 0:35:49.360
<v Speaker 14>so we don't need to get in the way of

0:35:49.840 --> 0:35:52.360
<v Speaker 14>the military operations that are happening at our test ranges,

0:35:52.480 --> 0:35:55.960
<v Speaker 14>so we can not disturb them while while landing commercially.

0:35:56.160 --> 0:36:00.880
<v Speaker 14>But it's great, I mean it makes the the the

0:36:00.920 --> 0:36:02.120
<v Speaker 14>process way easier.

0:36:02.880 --> 0:36:06.960
<v Speaker 5>You're excited about United Therapeutics deal. Where next? How what

0:36:07.000 --> 0:36:08.240
<v Speaker 5>does this prove out for others?

0:36:08.280 --> 0:36:09.719
<v Speaker 14>Well, this is just the tip of the tip of

0:36:09.760 --> 0:36:12.480
<v Speaker 14>the iceberg because it's such a broad technology that affects

0:36:12.520 --> 0:36:16.640
<v Speaker 14>so many drugs. You know, United is kind of in

0:36:16.680 --> 0:36:19.279
<v Speaker 14>the future and they have been for quite some time,

0:36:19.320 --> 0:36:21.080
<v Speaker 14>and so we're really lucky to work with such a

0:36:21.080 --> 0:36:24.360
<v Speaker 14>crack team. But this technology is broad, so it applies

0:36:24.400 --> 0:36:27.720
<v Speaker 14>to a wide variety of pharmaceuticals for a wide variety

0:36:27.719 --> 0:36:28.440
<v Speaker 14>of patients.

0:36:28.560 --> 0:36:31.200
<v Speaker 4>Well as that starts to go up into space, come

0:36:31.239 --> 0:36:34.160
<v Speaker 4>back join us. Wilbury, CEO of Art of Space, on

0:36:34.239 --> 0:36:37.279
<v Speaker 4>that new announcement. Meanwhile, there's been plenty of announcements coming

0:36:37.320 --> 0:36:41.560
<v Speaker 4>out about agentic commerce and international expansion from a firm.

0:36:41.960 --> 0:36:42.680
<v Speaker 5>It's just been.

0:36:42.560 --> 0:36:45.680
<v Speaker 4>Reporting yesterday at the company's twenty twenty six investor forum,

0:36:45.880 --> 0:36:49.200
<v Speaker 4>the fintech company is laying out a bold roadmap to

0:36:49.239 --> 0:36:51.560
<v Speaker 4>one hundred billion dollars in annual volume. Look, CEO Max

0:36:51.600 --> 0:36:53.600
<v Speaker 4>Levchen and plans to say, joins us in New York

0:36:53.640 --> 0:36:55.319
<v Speaker 4>and I'm sad I'm not their next to you, Max,

0:36:55.360 --> 0:36:57.880
<v Speaker 4>but to tell us about what you're in a I

0:36:58.000 --> 0:37:00.799
<v Speaker 4>know too far, but I'm in interested in what you

0:37:00.880 --> 0:37:04.280
<v Speaker 4>told the investors, the analyst community in New York yesterday

0:37:04.280 --> 0:37:05.600
<v Speaker 4>and for the next few days.

0:37:06.080 --> 0:37:07.879
<v Speaker 5>How do you get to that sort of volume? Where

0:37:07.880 --> 0:37:09.840
<v Speaker 5>are the growth factors you?

0:37:10.000 --> 0:37:13.719
<v Speaker 15>The exciting thing is that literally everything we have been

0:37:13.760 --> 0:37:17.040
<v Speaker 15>working towards is coming together and working incredibly well. We

0:37:17.120 --> 0:37:20.880
<v Speaker 15>held a similar event three years ago and promise investors

0:37:20.880 --> 0:37:24.280
<v Speaker 15>will get to fifty billion dollars of growth merchandise volume,

0:37:24.440 --> 0:37:27.880
<v Speaker 15>our merchant sales that we power, and we will do

0:37:28.000 --> 0:37:30.799
<v Speaker 15>so by maintaining while maintaining our profit margins within three

0:37:30.840 --> 0:37:33.400
<v Speaker 15>and four percent, we will grow at twenty percent per

0:37:33.480 --> 0:37:35.000
<v Speaker 15>year or so. That that was the story we told

0:37:35.080 --> 0:37:37.319
<v Speaker 15>them three years ago. We've now come back. We're now

0:37:37.320 --> 0:37:39.760
<v Speaker 15>basically at that fifty billion dollar mark. He would expect

0:37:39.840 --> 0:37:42.720
<v Speaker 15>us to slow down, but instead we told our investor

0:37:42.760 --> 0:37:45.840
<v Speaker 15>based yesterday, we expect to grow twenty five percent compounding,

0:37:45.880 --> 0:37:48.799
<v Speaker 15>so five points extra, and we intend to up the

0:37:48.960 --> 0:37:51.479
<v Speaker 15>floor of our profitability from three to three point seventy

0:37:51.520 --> 0:37:53.719
<v Speaker 15>five percent. So not only are we growing faster, not

0:37:53.760 --> 0:37:57.080
<v Speaker 15>only are we reaching more consumers, more merchants, we intend

0:37:57.120 --> 0:37:59.880
<v Speaker 15>to do this more profitably, and we feel it's just

0:38:00.040 --> 0:38:03.520
<v Speaker 15>getting better and better for us. So that's the that's

0:38:03.560 --> 0:38:05.560
<v Speaker 15>the headline. And you know, I read a lot of

0:38:05.560 --> 0:38:08.399
<v Speaker 15>conversations yesterday that seem to indicate that our investors quite

0:38:08.480 --> 0:38:09.239
<v Speaker 15>enjoying the news.

0:38:10.360 --> 0:38:13.120
<v Speaker 3>Mac Max just very simply, why is a one hundred

0:38:13.200 --> 0:38:15.680
<v Speaker 3>billion dollar volume target the right target?

0:38:15.719 --> 0:38:16.520
<v Speaker 2>The right metric?

0:38:16.840 --> 0:38:18.640
<v Speaker 3>When people try and understand a firm like you, come

0:38:18.719 --> 0:38:22.040
<v Speaker 3>the show often and we talk about the different offerings

0:38:22.080 --> 0:38:24.560
<v Speaker 3>and some of the newer products that you're doing this

0:38:24.640 --> 0:38:27.680
<v Speaker 3>kind of north star or achievable goal. Probably to your mind.

0:38:27.880 --> 0:38:29.880
<v Speaker 3>It's really interesting that you've set that as it.

0:38:31.080 --> 0:38:33.120
<v Speaker 15>You know, it is just a waypoint. We have absolutely

0:38:33.160 --> 0:38:35.279
<v Speaker 15>no intention of slowing down or stopping at one hundred

0:38:35.520 --> 0:38:37.839
<v Speaker 15>is just another nice round number that we can set

0:38:37.840 --> 0:38:41.479
<v Speaker 15>our sights to. But we do see an incredible market pull.

0:38:41.680 --> 0:38:45.279
<v Speaker 15>Consumers are ready, they are coming to us. We are

0:38:45.320 --> 0:38:48.160
<v Speaker 15>now seeing inbounds from consumers that have didn't discover us

0:38:48.200 --> 0:38:49.959
<v Speaker 15>at the point of sale, which is the usual way

0:38:50.400 --> 0:38:52.719
<v Speaker 15>just signing up for from asking us to send them

0:38:52.760 --> 0:38:55.120
<v Speaker 15>a card so they can transact everywhere. That's been a

0:38:55.160 --> 0:38:58.120
<v Speaker 15>huge poll that's contributed to our growth tremendously. Merchants come

0:38:58.160 --> 0:39:00.520
<v Speaker 15>to us saying, I've seen your logo on my competitor sites.

0:39:00.600 --> 0:39:02.920
<v Speaker 15>I know you're driving ten to twenty percent more sales

0:39:02.920 --> 0:39:03.319
<v Speaker 15>for them.

0:39:03.560 --> 0:39:04.640
<v Speaker 16>You should do the same for us.

0:39:04.800 --> 0:39:08.400
<v Speaker 15>Let us sign up, you should promote our sales events,

0:39:08.520 --> 0:39:11.040
<v Speaker 15>tell us merchants in your app. Because we're now reaching

0:39:11.080 --> 0:39:14.200
<v Speaker 15>fifteen million monthly consumers and so on. So just the

0:39:14.360 --> 0:39:18.400
<v Speaker 15>tremendous amount of we're finally a real scalable thing that

0:39:18.520 --> 0:39:21.239
<v Speaker 15>every constitution cares about a lot is what gives us

0:39:21.280 --> 0:39:23.320
<v Speaker 15>the confidence to go towards this new milestone.

0:39:24.239 --> 0:39:27.080
<v Speaker 4>AMS liked it, like obviously talking about the pending Industrial

0:39:27.120 --> 0:39:29.400
<v Speaker 4>Bank Charter. That could be another strength area than the

0:39:29.400 --> 0:39:31.840
<v Speaker 4>fact that you've got competitive advantage. But take us to

0:39:31.880 --> 0:39:35.239
<v Speaker 4>the future and the agentic commerce future, because we talk

0:39:35.239 --> 0:39:37.080
<v Speaker 4>about it a lot on the show and you are

0:39:37.120 --> 0:39:38.920
<v Speaker 4>already doing deals with Google.

0:39:38.960 --> 0:39:40.640
<v Speaker 5>What does that look like in.

0:39:40.600 --> 0:39:43.440
<v Speaker 4>Terms of how I'm going to be having a relationship

0:39:43.480 --> 0:39:44.480
<v Speaker 4>with a firm going forward.

0:39:44.640 --> 0:39:47.080
<v Speaker 15>I think it's going to be incredible. I cannot be

0:39:47.200 --> 0:39:51.160
<v Speaker 15>more excited about this new AI powered future in many

0:39:51.160 --> 0:39:53.919
<v Speaker 15>different facets As an engineer, as a coder, I love

0:39:54.120 --> 0:39:56.680
<v Speaker 15>what we have today. As a consumer, as a buyer

0:39:56.880 --> 0:40:00.120
<v Speaker 15>of complicated things, I love the help that a I

0:40:00.200 --> 0:40:02.560
<v Speaker 15>provides me when I research the finer points of you know,

0:40:02.560 --> 0:40:05.000
<v Speaker 15>whatever it is that I'm the matter now. A firm

0:40:05.200 --> 0:40:08.560
<v Speaker 15>is a great tool of buying things that are meaningful

0:40:08.600 --> 0:40:10.759
<v Speaker 15>that when it matters. That's when consumers come to us.

0:40:10.800 --> 0:40:12.759
<v Speaker 15>They want anything from a bicycle to a couch to

0:40:12.760 --> 0:40:16.399
<v Speaker 15>the expressing machine. During those moments, you want to know

0:40:16.640 --> 0:40:19.279
<v Speaker 15>that the financing choice you're making has your back that

0:40:19.360 --> 0:40:21.239
<v Speaker 15>you're not going to get hit with some unexpected fees.

0:40:21.280 --> 0:40:23.600
<v Speaker 15>You know exactly when you're going to start and stop

0:40:23.680 --> 0:40:24.480
<v Speaker 15>with your payments.

0:40:24.680 --> 0:40:26.520
<v Speaker 2>That's what we've built, and.

0:40:26.880 --> 0:40:29.560
<v Speaker 15>Agents just make it that much easier to bring to

0:40:29.880 --> 0:40:32.440
<v Speaker 15>the end consumer. And the brand we've built allows people

0:40:32.440 --> 0:40:34.160
<v Speaker 15>to trust us. The fact that we're able to partner

0:40:34.600 --> 0:40:37.319
<v Speaker 15>with LM providers allows us to be right there when

0:40:37.320 --> 0:40:39.680
<v Speaker 15>consumers are searching and doing the research. So it's just

0:40:39.760 --> 0:40:43.760
<v Speaker 15>an incredible incremental growth engine that we found.

0:40:44.520 --> 0:40:47.360
<v Speaker 3>Max, you're again emphasizing the word built. You do that often.

0:40:47.480 --> 0:40:50.520
<v Speaker 3>But how does quickly, Max Leftchin, think about M and

0:40:50.600 --> 0:40:52.040
<v Speaker 3>A in a firm's future.

0:40:53.080 --> 0:40:55.040
<v Speaker 15>You know, we've looked for years. We haven't found anything

0:40:55.080 --> 0:40:57.799
<v Speaker 15>in the last few so never say never. But we

0:40:57.880 --> 0:40:59.759
<v Speaker 15>have so much to do just with a team that

0:40:59.800 --> 0:41:02.879
<v Speaker 15>we have. It's you know, when opportunities come up, well,

0:41:02.880 --> 0:41:04.719
<v Speaker 15>of course, look at them, but we're very focused on

0:41:04.760 --> 0:41:06.839
<v Speaker 15>building a firm here.

0:41:06.920 --> 0:41:09.200
<v Speaker 3>Max Leftchin back on Bloomberg Tech, thank you very much

0:41:09.200 --> 0:41:11.360
<v Speaker 3>for your time today. Now coming out, we're going to

0:41:11.400 --> 0:41:14.040
<v Speaker 3>get the bank to what to expect from President Trump's meeting.

0:41:14.040 --> 0:41:18.640
<v Speaker 3>Regijen Ping and will Ai be in focus. Probably this

0:41:18.760 --> 0:41:19.760
<v Speaker 3>is Bloomberg.

0:41:19.320 --> 0:41:24.680
<v Speaker 4>Tech, it's time now for talking tech and first start.

0:41:24.760 --> 0:41:28.120
<v Speaker 4>Softbag posted a jump in profit fueled by valuation games

0:41:28.160 --> 0:41:30.919
<v Speaker 4>on its open AI investment. Kano Mascioshi San has spent

0:41:31.000 --> 0:41:33.720
<v Speaker 4>the last year pivoting the company's focus from bench startups

0:41:33.840 --> 0:41:35.560
<v Speaker 4>to silicon and data centers.

0:41:35.960 --> 0:41:37.160
<v Speaker 5>Plus, following a visit.

0:41:36.960 --> 0:41:40.279
<v Speaker 4>From Scott Besant, Japan's three megabanks are set to gain

0:41:40.360 --> 0:41:43.919
<v Speaker 4>access to anthropics powerful mythos models, according to the person

0:41:43.920 --> 0:41:46.080
<v Speaker 4>Familie with the matter Now. The move comes despite a

0:41:46.120 --> 0:41:49.960
<v Speaker 4>widespread alarm over Mythos and speculation about its potential cybersecurity

0:41:50.040 --> 0:41:52.960
<v Speaker 4>risks and Nevius Well. It's emerging as a powerhouse in

0:41:52.960 --> 0:41:55.480
<v Speaker 4>the AI data center gold rush, reporting a six hundred

0:41:55.480 --> 0:41:58.120
<v Speaker 4>and eighty four percent jump in first quarter sales on

0:41:58.200 --> 0:42:01.360
<v Speaker 4>increased demand for its own data center. The company competes

0:42:01.400 --> 0:42:04.439
<v Speaker 4>with the range of neocloud startups like Callweve that rent

0:42:04.480 --> 0:42:06.560
<v Speaker 4>out competing resources to AI developers.

0:42:07.040 --> 0:42:09.640
<v Speaker 3>ED okay, just go back to what everyone's talking about today,

0:42:09.640 --> 0:42:12.760
<v Speaker 3>and that's President Trump's meeting, was ujingping and what to expect.

0:42:13.000 --> 0:42:16.279
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Senior Tech editor Mike Shephard joins us from DC

0:42:16.960 --> 0:42:18.920
<v Speaker 3>GO to our senior tech editor. Because there is a

0:42:18.920 --> 0:42:21.919
<v Speaker 3>big delegation of tech CEOs with the president. Jensen Wong

0:42:22.080 --> 0:42:24.640
<v Speaker 3>is with him and those are the issues on the table.

0:42:26.760 --> 0:42:30.239
<v Speaker 17>Those are the addition at the last minute in a

0:42:30.320 --> 0:42:34.280
<v Speaker 17>really dramatic move of Jensen Wang to the trip certainly

0:42:34.360 --> 0:42:38.360
<v Speaker 17>thrust artificial intelligence to the center of the discussions.

0:42:38.560 --> 0:42:40.839
<v Speaker 16>It's unclear what sort of progress we.

0:42:40.800 --> 0:42:42.960
<v Speaker 17>Will actually see in the areas that are most dear

0:42:43.040 --> 0:42:46.080
<v Speaker 17>to Nvidia and that would be gaining more access to

0:42:46.160 --> 0:42:49.439
<v Speaker 17>the Chinese market. They have one US permission to sell

0:42:49.440 --> 0:42:53.239
<v Speaker 17>those h two hundred AI chips to customers in China,

0:42:53.280 --> 0:42:56.640
<v Speaker 17>but Chinese authorities have been reluctant to allow their own

0:42:56.719 --> 0:43:00.520
<v Speaker 17>producers to buy those chips on mass and is they

0:43:00.560 --> 0:43:03.840
<v Speaker 17>want to promote and protect their own domestic chip making

0:43:03.880 --> 0:43:07.520
<v Speaker 17>industry led by Huawei, led by Cambra Con and SMIC,

0:43:08.040 --> 0:43:09.959
<v Speaker 17>and yet there is the tension on the other side.

0:43:10.000 --> 0:43:14.520
<v Speaker 17>They want their own artificial intelligence companies, the model developers

0:43:14.600 --> 0:43:16.880
<v Speaker 17>also the gain and edge and they have been clamoring

0:43:16.920 --> 0:43:20.560
<v Speaker 17>for that. And today we did see shares of Minimax

0:43:20.960 --> 0:43:24.440
<v Speaker 17>knowledge at lists and even today US traded shares of Ali,

0:43:24.440 --> 0:43:27.360
<v Speaker 17>Baba and bay Do all climb on the prospect that

0:43:27.400 --> 0:43:30.640
<v Speaker 17>there could be more compute going to China.

0:43:30.920 --> 0:43:33.719
<v Speaker 4>Talk to us about the names that were already solidified

0:43:33.760 --> 0:43:38.640
<v Speaker 4>as going, because Qualcom's going, Micron's going. Companies with exposure

0:43:38.680 --> 0:43:40.440
<v Speaker 4>to China and the one to increase where would they

0:43:40.480 --> 0:43:42.759
<v Speaker 4>be fitting in to the ultimate demand equation.

0:43:42.560 --> 0:43:45.440
<v Speaker 16>Here well the broader demand equation.

0:43:45.520 --> 0:43:48.360
<v Speaker 17>Of course, from Micron, they have their own separate issues

0:43:48.440 --> 0:43:52.359
<v Speaker 17>with China where they are almost company non grata at

0:43:52.400 --> 0:43:56.440
<v Speaker 17>a certain level. Their role in the memory market is

0:43:56.560 --> 0:44:00.279
<v Speaker 17>really key as well, and it's something that for chip

0:44:00.280 --> 0:44:03.120
<v Speaker 17>makers and developers worldwide they want to have a piece

0:44:03.160 --> 0:44:06.560
<v Speaker 17>of being able to contribute to the creation of AI

0:44:06.640 --> 0:44:10.640
<v Speaker 17>processors not only designed by Nvidium, by AMD, but by

0:44:10.719 --> 0:44:13.120
<v Speaker 17>other companies as well, so they could be looking to

0:44:13.200 --> 0:44:16.520
<v Speaker 17>push into there, and same with Qualcom. Qualcom of course

0:44:16.560 --> 0:44:18.880
<v Speaker 17>has a lot of business when it comes to chips

0:44:18.920 --> 0:44:22.360
<v Speaker 17>for mobile phones, and that could be a way in there.

0:44:22.600 --> 0:44:25.279
<v Speaker 16>More broadly, when we look at this trip and.

0:44:25.239 --> 0:44:27.640
<v Speaker 17>Its agenda, though, Caro, it's interesting that we see the

0:44:27.719 --> 0:44:31.399
<v Speaker 17>White House Science and Technology Policy Advisor Michael Kratzio's there,

0:44:31.520 --> 0:44:34.680
<v Speaker 17>and this could signal that AI and discussions around the

0:44:34.719 --> 0:44:38.319
<v Speaker 17>technology will be really front and Center. We could see

0:44:38.320 --> 0:44:42.520
<v Speaker 17>the US raise concerns about the practice of distillation that

0:44:42.520 --> 0:44:46.400
<v Speaker 17>we have seen where AI models are unfairly extracted, and

0:44:47.120 --> 0:44:50.200
<v Speaker 17>also a working group created to discuss.

0:44:49.760 --> 0:44:54.399
<v Speaker 4>AI Mike Shepherd across all the latest coming between those

0:44:54.840 --> 0:44:56.880
<v Speaker 4>key talks in Beijing at the moment.

0:44:56.920 --> 0:44:58.239
<v Speaker 5>We appreciate you running it.

0:44:58.200 --> 0:44:59.799
<v Speaker 4>Up, but that does it for this edition of bloom

0:44:59.840 --> 0:45:02.200
<v Speaker 4>Bag Tech. Right here from San Francisco. We've got to

0:45:02.200 --> 0:45:04.759
<v Speaker 4>get back to that breaking news that you helped break

0:45:04.840 --> 0:45:07.480
<v Speaker 4>in earlier this hour. Talk us through why ARM was

0:45:07.520 --> 0:45:09.080
<v Speaker 4>potentially looking to buy Cerebras.

0:45:09.160 --> 0:45:12.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, ARM and SoftBank tried to buy Cerebras, Sobria said no,

0:45:12.360 --> 0:45:15.600
<v Speaker 3>they will go public tomorrow. But Cerebris makes supercomputers at

0:45:15.640 --> 0:45:18.080
<v Speaker 3>scale for inference, and that's where the AI story is

0:45:18.200 --> 0:45:21.400
<v Speaker 3>right now. That, of course, all according to Bloomberg sources.

0:45:21.440 --> 0:45:23.960
<v Speaker 3>Recap that story and many others on the podcast. You

0:45:24.000 --> 0:45:26.759
<v Speaker 3>know where to find it, Apple, Spotify, iHeart and all

0:45:26.840 --> 0:45:28.080
<v Speaker 3>of the Bloomberg platforms.

0:45:28.160 --> 0:45:29.040
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech