WEBVTT - LIV’s savior investor: real or fake? And Flashback Friday

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Now, the Shotgun Starting Golf is full of mathematics. There's

0:00:04.160 --> 0:00:06.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of a lot of setup work that we

0:00:06.320 --> 0:00:08.160
<v Speaker 1>have to do in order to make a tournament work.

0:00:09.039 --> 0:00:12.080
<v Speaker 1>So I'm going to demonstrate to you just exactly how

0:00:12.119 --> 0:00:15.560
<v Speaker 1>we do a shotgun start here week.

0:00:17.079 --> 0:00:24.320
<v Speaker 2>All right, all right, all right, did no man dark

0:00:25.040 --> 0:00:42.720
<v Speaker 2>you are greedy to welcome to a Friday edition of

0:00:42.760 --> 0:00:46.960
<v Speaker 2>The Shotgun Start. It is August seventh, Andy, how we doing.

0:00:47.520 --> 0:00:52.120
<v Speaker 3>Brendan, I'm doing fantastic. I had a great week showing

0:00:52.320 --> 0:00:55.880
<v Speaker 3>showing a bunch of people around the fair city of Chicago.

0:00:57.000 --> 0:00:59.040
<v Speaker 2>Fair City of Chicago. Is that a phrase there?

0:00:59.080 --> 0:00:59.240
<v Speaker 4>Is that?

0:00:59.360 --> 0:01:02.560
<v Speaker 2>Just something new pulled up as we lead into the podcast.

0:01:02.600 --> 0:01:06.720
<v Speaker 3>That's just what I didn't tell you that adjective.

0:01:07.200 --> 0:01:09.319
<v Speaker 2>All right, there you go. I'm glad we've got We've

0:01:09.360 --> 0:01:13.160
<v Speaker 2>got a lot of content coming around Chicago. Chicago Guides

0:01:13.319 --> 0:01:19.200
<v Speaker 2>video written as we steve head towards the President's Cup

0:01:19.319 --> 0:01:20.920
<v Speaker 2>at the end of the end of September, we've got

0:01:20.959 --> 0:01:24.120
<v Speaker 2>playoffs to sort through, FedEx cups to sort through. May

0:01:24.240 --> 0:01:25.880
<v Speaker 2>know a little bit more about the end of September,

0:01:25.959 --> 0:01:30.720
<v Speaker 2>whether Live is still a thing, funded, credited, whatever it

0:01:30.800 --> 0:01:33.360
<v Speaker 2>may be by the end of September. We'll talk about

0:01:33.400 --> 0:01:33.960
<v Speaker 2>that in a minute.

0:01:33.959 --> 0:01:37.959
<v Speaker 3>It seems like that was a pretty premature announcement of funding.

0:01:40.560 --> 0:01:43.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, you could say that you want to do

0:01:43.480 --> 0:01:46.679
<v Speaker 2>that right now, you want to dispense with the uh.

0:01:47.600 --> 0:01:51.920
<v Speaker 2>So Wednesday morning, ten a m. Eastern there is a

0:01:52.000 --> 0:01:54.840
<v Speaker 2>press conference call for Live Bedminster.

0:01:56.960 --> 0:01:57.080
<v Speaker 3>Uh.

0:01:57.240 --> 0:02:00.600
<v Speaker 2>There's no details, there's no there's no COURUS responding or

0:02:00.720 --> 0:02:07.280
<v Speaker 2>concurrent press release, documents, official statements of any kind. It's

0:02:07.480 --> 0:02:11.959
<v Speaker 2>just Scott O'Neill up there, free will in it purplely

0:02:12.600 --> 0:02:16.560
<v Speaker 2>orally Yeah yeah, I uh, I'm do the TikTok here.

0:02:16.600 --> 0:02:21.239
<v Speaker 2>But but one conclusion is Scott O'Neill he made I

0:02:21.520 --> 0:02:23.160
<v Speaker 2>don't think he's a bad guy. He seems like a

0:02:23.280 --> 0:02:26.440
<v Speaker 2>nice man put in a very tough spot. He also

0:02:26.560 --> 0:02:28.239
<v Speaker 2>may be kind of a do fist and sell it

0:02:28.360 --> 0:02:31.679
<v Speaker 2>used car salesman like elements to it. But I do

0:02:31.840 --> 0:02:35.079
<v Speaker 2>think he might not be a bad guy. And in

0:02:35.200 --> 0:02:39.639
<v Speaker 2>a very very challenging situation that he's trying to, you know,

0:02:39.760 --> 0:02:42.720
<v Speaker 2>put whipped cream on on shit, as they say. Uh,

0:02:43.280 --> 0:02:45.280
<v Speaker 2>And that's a tough spot and doesn't make you always

0:02:45.320 --> 0:02:50.840
<v Speaker 2>look like the uh most forthright person, you know, when

0:02:51.440 --> 0:02:54.399
<v Speaker 2>is it's your charge to do that? So ten Am

0:02:55.160 --> 0:02:58.080
<v Speaker 2>calls a press conference. The language is, we're very fortunate

0:02:58.160 --> 0:03:00.520
<v Speaker 2>that e Laite investor has signed a term she approved

0:03:00.520 --> 0:03:06.760
<v Speaker 2>by our board which will carry and fund Live going forward.

0:03:07.480 --> 0:03:09.480
<v Speaker 2>At the end of that press conference, if the deal

0:03:09.560 --> 0:03:12.280
<v Speaker 2>gets finalized, there will be a twenty two Will there

0:03:12.360 --> 0:03:14.880
<v Speaker 2>be a twenty twenty seven season, he's asked, And twenty

0:03:14.960 --> 0:03:17.920
<v Speaker 2>eight he says, and twenty nine and thirty, So we're

0:03:18.000 --> 0:03:20.280
<v Speaker 2>led to believe this deal will carry and fund Live

0:03:20.360 --> 0:03:23.920
<v Speaker 2>going forward through maybe twenty thirty. That's what we understand.

0:03:26.360 --> 0:03:28.720
<v Speaker 2>The quotes are along the lines agreement in place with

0:03:28.720 --> 0:03:32.200
<v Speaker 2>the lead investor, signed by investor approved by the board

0:03:32.480 --> 0:03:37.720
<v Speaker 2>to anchor the transaction, which is a curious use of

0:03:37.920 --> 0:03:40.640
<v Speaker 2>you know, kind of word salad, to anchor the transaction

0:03:41.720 --> 0:03:43.840
<v Speaker 2>and play a key role in supporting the path forward

0:03:43.880 --> 0:03:47.360
<v Speaker 2>for Leaves Next Lives Next era. Our next chapter will

0:03:47.400 --> 0:03:50.640
<v Speaker 2>make our players majority equity holders and Live Golf, a

0:03:50.760 --> 0:03:55.680
<v Speaker 2>first for a major global sports league. So that's ten Am.

0:03:56.760 --> 0:03:59.440
<v Speaker 2>It's just Scott O'Neill on the dais that's what we have.

0:04:00.040 --> 0:04:03.720
<v Speaker 3>Can we just back up and sure look at the verbiage.

0:04:04.040 --> 0:04:04.920
<v Speaker 2>He always.

0:04:06.200 --> 0:04:15.120
<v Speaker 3>Lead investor, carrying fund live, going forward, carrying fun It's

0:04:15.240 --> 0:04:19.680
<v Speaker 3>just an odd use of the word investor. It is

0:04:19.839 --> 0:04:20.800
<v Speaker 3>what came out later.

0:04:21.279 --> 0:04:26.200
<v Speaker 2>It is sign term sheet approved by the board. Yes,

0:04:26.480 --> 0:04:28.800
<v Speaker 2>how much of that is it is a true statement?

0:04:31.200 --> 0:04:35.599
<v Speaker 2>Uh well, the truth is sort of a subjective sort

0:04:35.640 --> 0:04:37.320
<v Speaker 2>of shifting.

0:04:38.080 --> 0:04:41.800
<v Speaker 3>It's wackle. You get up and just say something is

0:04:41.880 --> 0:04:43.160
<v Speaker 3>categorically untrue.

0:04:44.400 --> 0:04:46.960
<v Speaker 2>So an hour and a half after he talks, we'll

0:04:47.000 --> 0:04:49.919
<v Speaker 2>get to where the holes may come in the statement.

0:04:50.480 --> 0:04:53.160
<v Speaker 2>Hour and a half, Dry talks. Live finally issues in

0:04:53.160 --> 0:04:57.400
<v Speaker 2>an official statement, which sounds, i would say, different than

0:04:57.440 --> 0:05:01.720
<v Speaker 2>the characterizations from the oral press conference. Lift Golf has

0:05:01.720 --> 0:05:04.560
<v Speaker 2>an agreement in place with the lead investor, signed by

0:05:04.600 --> 0:05:07.000
<v Speaker 2>the investor, proved by the board, to anchor the transaction

0:05:07.120 --> 0:05:09.000
<v Speaker 2>and play key role in supporting the path forward for

0:05:09.040 --> 0:05:11.359
<v Speaker 2>the league's next era, driven by and for the players.

0:05:12.279 --> 0:05:18.720
<v Speaker 2>That seems similar verbiage, similar language, very such ads. We're

0:05:18.760 --> 0:05:21.720
<v Speaker 2>seeing strong interest from more than a dozen additional parties,

0:05:21.760 --> 0:05:23.920
<v Speaker 2>which she said, you know, everybody's ready to get in

0:05:24.000 --> 0:05:24.279
<v Speaker 2>the boat.

0:05:24.320 --> 0:05:25.520
<v Speaker 3>We just need the boat.

0:05:26.080 --> 0:05:27.600
<v Speaker 2>You know, we got a lot of people ready to

0:05:27.680 --> 0:05:31.479
<v Speaker 2>get in and help sail it, help you know, run

0:05:31.560 --> 0:05:38.840
<v Speaker 2>the sales, but we need people to get in lead investor.

0:05:39.080 --> 0:05:44.719
<v Speaker 2>Let's get to this language. Later that day, Bloomberg reports

0:05:45.000 --> 0:05:47.680
<v Speaker 2>BC Partners, of course, we have no idea how much,

0:05:47.800 --> 0:05:50.280
<v Speaker 2>who what? And Joseph and I do a little. This

0:05:50.440 --> 0:05:54.279
<v Speaker 2>is was in your feed reaction to understanding who what where?

0:05:54.360 --> 0:05:54.520
<v Speaker 3>When?

0:05:54.640 --> 0:05:58.360
<v Speaker 2>We still don't know. It's just lead investor. So Bloomberg

0:05:58.440 --> 0:06:00.760
<v Speaker 2>then comes in with a report that be see Partner's

0:06:00.960 --> 0:06:04.960
<v Speaker 2>credit arm is leading a group of investors looking at

0:06:05.160 --> 0:06:10.880
<v Speaker 2>lending money to live golf. So the credit arm lending

0:06:11.279 --> 0:06:16.360
<v Speaker 2>money to live golf. Well, that's that's not an investor, right, No,

0:06:16.720 --> 0:06:20.039
<v Speaker 2>BC partner does have is a big wonder based private

0:06:20.080 --> 0:06:24.680
<v Speaker 2>equity company, does have an equity an investment arm also

0:06:24.760 --> 0:06:25.960
<v Speaker 2>has a credit division.

0:06:26.480 --> 0:06:29.320
<v Speaker 3>I wanted to just check, you know, with with somebody

0:06:29.400 --> 0:06:32.760
<v Speaker 3>else about this, so I just you know, I asked,

0:06:33.600 --> 0:06:36.640
<v Speaker 3>I asked AI, which you call someone who loans you

0:06:36.760 --> 0:06:44.200
<v Speaker 3>money an investor? And their response was no, No, at

0:06:44.320 --> 0:06:46.120
<v Speaker 3>least not in the standard usage.

0:06:48.960 --> 0:06:52.400
<v Speaker 2>Uh So that is a Bloomberg Business report.

0:06:53.240 --> 0:06:57.080
<v Speaker 3>BC credit army lending should be called a lender or

0:06:57.160 --> 0:07:01.479
<v Speaker 3>a creditor. Of course. The funny thing is the way

0:07:01.680 --> 0:07:06.200
<v Speaker 3>everybody reacted to this because everybody reacts. I was PJ

0:07:06.360 --> 0:07:09.160
<v Speaker 3>and I and some others were filming some stuff, so

0:07:09.240 --> 0:07:12.640
<v Speaker 3>I was kind of silent, but I was taking in everything.

0:07:13.840 --> 0:07:16.480
<v Speaker 3>Everybody's acting like it's like this huge deal and then

0:07:16.600 --> 0:07:20.240
<v Speaker 3>this comes out. But this is where like usually people

0:07:20.400 --> 0:07:24.800
<v Speaker 3>announce things and you you if anything you withhold details

0:07:24.840 --> 0:07:29.280
<v Speaker 3>in your extra conservative in an announcement, would you agree

0:07:29.320 --> 0:07:32.680
<v Speaker 3>with that kind of you try and be a little

0:07:32.720 --> 0:07:37.080
<v Speaker 3>bit more conservative on this one. It I don't know

0:07:37.160 --> 0:07:44.480
<v Speaker 3>what the right word is. Almost I felt misled spoken mirrors.

0:07:44.760 --> 0:07:50.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah to raid, this should be we were we found

0:07:50.560 --> 0:07:54.440
<v Speaker 3>a creditor. How the headlines would be different is like

0:07:55.040 --> 0:07:58.880
<v Speaker 3>we found a creditor to loan us maybe to maybe

0:07:59.080 --> 0:08:03.760
<v Speaker 3>loan us money. Of course, you know, I.

0:08:05.640 --> 0:08:08.640
<v Speaker 2>Know a little bit about finance. I wouldn't say, I'm

0:08:10.040 --> 0:08:12.200
<v Speaker 2>why can't turn around a whiz kid?

0:08:12.440 --> 0:08:12.800
<v Speaker 3>I don't know.

0:08:12.920 --> 0:08:16.480
<v Speaker 2>It's just heard a noise out the window. You know,

0:08:16.560 --> 0:08:19.120
<v Speaker 2>if they're if it's alone, that would be need to

0:08:19.400 --> 0:08:23.040
<v Speaker 2>need to provide you know, payback be returned from a

0:08:23.120 --> 0:08:26.600
<v Speaker 2>business that is or an entity or a subject or

0:08:26.640 --> 0:08:29.280
<v Speaker 2>an asset that is hopefully profitable in some way and

0:08:29.400 --> 0:08:33.880
<v Speaker 2>can pay it back with interest. I don't know if

0:08:33.960 --> 0:08:37.920
<v Speaker 2>LIFF can do that in its current structure, but maybe

0:08:38.040 --> 0:08:40.240
<v Speaker 2>some future Live two point zero.

0:08:40.200 --> 0:08:44.160
<v Speaker 3>Might get there. Who knows, all right. Four thirty four

0:08:44.320 --> 0:08:44.840
<v Speaker 3>twenty one.

0:08:45.040 --> 0:08:49.960
<v Speaker 2>Dan Premack of Axios Business Editor reports Lift Golf says

0:08:49.960 --> 0:08:52.400
<v Speaker 2>it has a signed agreement quote unquote with the new

0:08:52.520 --> 0:08:56.600
<v Speaker 2>financing with a quote lead investor. It doesn't idea, then't

0:08:56.640 --> 0:09:00.360
<v Speaker 2>let lead investor, but it's BC Partners. A source, however,

0:09:00.679 --> 0:09:04.920
<v Speaker 2>disputes that the deal is signed. I wonder if it's

0:09:05.320 --> 0:09:07.719
<v Speaker 2>maybe more of an l o I. This is from

0:09:07.840 --> 0:09:12.240
<v Speaker 2>Axios Business Reporting. So as the day progressed, we just

0:09:12.320 --> 0:09:15.559
<v Speaker 2>start to see that we peel back the onion and

0:09:15.640 --> 0:09:16.920
<v Speaker 2>maybe there's nothing in the middle.

0:09:17.320 --> 0:09:18.440
<v Speaker 3>So it's not an investor.

0:09:20.280 --> 0:09:24.599
<v Speaker 2>Maybe some document of some sort maybe signed, but it

0:09:24.679 --> 0:09:25.679
<v Speaker 2>may be more of an l o I.

0:09:26.760 --> 0:09:29.280
<v Speaker 3>There's all. It's not a it's not the deal's not

0:09:29.480 --> 0:09:32.440
<v Speaker 3>fully in place and approved by the board. It appears.

0:09:33.320 --> 0:09:36.960
<v Speaker 3>I mean, we have all this like incredible.

0:09:37.800 --> 0:09:41.319
<v Speaker 2>Language of like enter we want to enter the transaction

0:09:41.679 --> 0:09:45.719
<v Speaker 2>in September, you know, is it assigned turm sheet? Is

0:09:45.760 --> 0:09:49.800
<v Speaker 2>it assigned l o I. We're kind of playing fast

0:09:49.840 --> 0:09:52.760
<v Speaker 2>and loose with what's what's the substance of it. The

0:09:52.880 --> 0:09:57.239
<v Speaker 2>Financial Times then adds to the report those two gu

0:09:57.480 --> 0:10:02.400
<v Speaker 2>The Financial Times. Yes, BC Partners is the credit division.

0:10:02.720 --> 0:10:06.719
<v Speaker 2>The credit division of BC Partners is the investor, as

0:10:06.920 --> 0:10:10.439
<v Speaker 2>reported by Bloomberg, Yet the path to a final agreement

0:10:10.679 --> 0:10:15.880
<v Speaker 2>for Live has turned into complex multi party negotiation, according

0:10:15.960 --> 0:10:19.000
<v Speaker 2>to people involved with BC Partners or other possible investors,

0:10:19.040 --> 0:10:24.040
<v Speaker 2>seeking assurances that Live Star players will stay with the league,

0:10:24.360 --> 0:10:27.839
<v Speaker 2>So we will lend, but we must know what we're

0:10:27.920 --> 0:10:31.120
<v Speaker 2>lending to. Is this lending to John Ram backed or

0:10:31.200 --> 0:10:35.880
<v Speaker 2>John Ram involved Live Bryce and others. The PIFF is

0:10:36.000 --> 0:10:41.000
<v Speaker 2>considering paying off those contracts at a discount. I don't

0:10:41.120 --> 0:10:43.760
<v Speaker 2>quite Are they paying off the contracts or it's just

0:10:43.840 --> 0:10:46.480
<v Speaker 2>a buyout. It's a buyout of not the full price,

0:10:46.600 --> 0:10:50.439
<v Speaker 2>paying off those contracts at a discount to settle any

0:10:50.520 --> 0:10:54.200
<v Speaker 2>potential liability as well to avoid bad publicity. I think

0:10:55.400 --> 0:10:58.920
<v Speaker 2>the PIF is now interested in publics bad publicity uh

0:11:00.360 --> 0:11:03.360
<v Speaker 2>from the players to potential any liability, or is to

0:11:03.440 --> 0:11:06.920
<v Speaker 2>avoid bad publicity, leaving the player's position to sign fresh

0:11:07.040 --> 0:11:11.760
<v Speaker 2>deals with the BC Partners backed circuit that would include

0:11:11.840 --> 0:11:14.360
<v Speaker 2>cash as well as equity in the new league. According

0:11:14.400 --> 0:11:19.920
<v Speaker 2>to those close to the negotiations. O'Neill's public remarks confirmed

0:11:19.920 --> 0:11:22.079
<v Speaker 2>that equity stakes would be a key selling point to

0:11:22.120 --> 0:11:24.599
<v Speaker 2>players to convince them to stick with Live with the

0:11:24.679 --> 0:11:27.840
<v Speaker 2>golfers envision as collectively owning a majority of the tour.

0:11:28.720 --> 0:11:31.199
<v Speaker 2>A settlement then might come in the form of a

0:11:31.280 --> 0:11:35.880
<v Speaker 2>prepackaged bankruptcy, where a court process could quickly class league

0:11:36.040 --> 0:11:38.520
<v Speaker 2>legacy liabilities and allow new investment to come in free

0:11:38.559 --> 0:11:43.360
<v Speaker 2>of any entanglements from the previous era. Person involved the

0:11:43.400 --> 0:11:46.480
<v Speaker 2>discussion said, the new investors will need assurances that these

0:11:46.520 --> 0:11:48.880
<v Speaker 2>players are not going to pursue any more money from the.

0:11:48.920 --> 0:11:51.760
<v Speaker 3>PIFF and say we got stiffed.

0:11:52.600 --> 0:11:58.000
<v Speaker 2>So just to clarify, like, the players need to settle

0:11:58.080 --> 0:12:02.560
<v Speaker 2>up with the PIFF, maybe not at full but then

0:12:02.679 --> 0:12:05.560
<v Speaker 2>the new BC partners could lend some money, but only

0:12:05.679 --> 0:12:09.040
<v Speaker 2>if they may if they know those players will stay

0:12:09.200 --> 0:12:14.719
<v Speaker 2>and be involved and they'll also become equity holders in

0:12:14.880 --> 0:12:19.040
<v Speaker 2>this new lived point to two point zero. It's sort

0:12:19.080 --> 0:12:22.360
<v Speaker 2>of a lot of like you know Spider Man meme,

0:12:22.960 --> 0:12:25.720
<v Speaker 2>three guys staring at each other, like who's gonna bite.

0:12:25.559 --> 0:12:29.679
<v Speaker 3>First and trigger There is a pathway here.

0:12:30.040 --> 0:12:34.520
<v Speaker 2>I found like the word complex to sort of be

0:12:34.640 --> 0:12:39.079
<v Speaker 2>a cloak for this is a This is trying to

0:12:39.200 --> 0:12:43.640
<v Speaker 2>make something that's really shitty into something that's survivable for

0:12:43.800 --> 0:12:46.800
<v Speaker 2>like a year or two. You know, complex can be

0:12:46.880 --> 0:12:49.000
<v Speaker 2>a funny word. It can cover a lot of ground, right.

0:12:49.280 --> 0:12:53.760
<v Speaker 2>Complex can mean good. Complex could mean we're trying to

0:12:53.920 --> 0:12:55.720
<v Speaker 2>like repair a boat as it's sinking.

0:12:55.840 --> 0:12:59.959
<v Speaker 3>I had a complex morning getting my daughter to eat breakfast.

0:13:04.720 --> 0:13:08.960
<v Speaker 3>So there's this go ahead. I just read a message

0:13:09.000 --> 0:13:12.839
<v Speaker 3>I got from, uh, you know, an astute listener of

0:13:12.920 --> 0:13:16.160
<v Speaker 3>the show who knows knows a lot about this type

0:13:16.200 --> 0:13:18.040
<v Speaker 3>of these types of transactions.

0:13:18.280 --> 0:13:20.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, a lot a lot of those guys coming all

0:13:20.400 --> 0:13:21.280
<v Speaker 2>over work this week.

0:13:21.360 --> 0:13:26.920
<v Speaker 3>I found said, everyone is taking this live announcement too seriously. Yeah,

0:13:28.160 --> 0:13:32.440
<v Speaker 3>citing a term sheet is non binding. By the way,

0:13:32.760 --> 0:13:37.520
<v Speaker 3>if they reject Rahm's contract in bankruptcy, then he leaves,

0:13:38.200 --> 0:13:43.040
<v Speaker 3>he will be a big creditor and own equity and live. Anyways,

0:13:44.920 --> 0:13:47.679
<v Speaker 3>they will do everything to dilute him down. But it's

0:13:47.760 --> 0:13:53.680
<v Speaker 3>pretty funny. Well that's the other issue. Equity.

0:13:55.400 --> 0:13:59.000
<v Speaker 2>Not all equity is created equal, which sounds like almost redundant,

0:14:00.240 --> 0:14:04.599
<v Speaker 2>Like the lender will have preferred equity the BC, Like,

0:14:05.640 --> 0:14:08.400
<v Speaker 2>you know, if this thing goes belly up, or it's

0:14:08.520 --> 0:14:10.720
<v Speaker 2>like not working in a year two years, and they

0:14:10.800 --> 0:14:13.360
<v Speaker 2>have to liquidate it and all the ascids, whatever's left

0:14:13.679 --> 0:14:16.439
<v Speaker 2>can be returned to the creditors, it will go to

0:14:18.320 --> 0:14:20.640
<v Speaker 2>the lender, and then what's left the scraps will end

0:14:20.720 --> 0:14:24.120
<v Speaker 2>up with these quote unquote player equity most likely player

0:14:24.160 --> 0:14:27.960
<v Speaker 2>equity holders, right, which wouldn't be probably a lot at

0:14:27.960 --> 0:14:31.560
<v Speaker 2>the end once they get through whatever they're if in

0:14:31.720 --> 0:14:41.440
<v Speaker 2>when it goes billy up. So you're also removing essentially

0:14:41.560 --> 0:14:45.120
<v Speaker 2>like the the one of the large impetuses for for

0:14:45.280 --> 0:14:47.600
<v Speaker 2>Jon Rahm or someone like with the big contract to

0:14:47.720 --> 0:14:50.400
<v Speaker 2>remain involved. All right, I've settled up with the piff

0:14:53.040 --> 0:14:55.880
<v Speaker 2>and that was sort of what was keeping me handcuffed

0:14:56.080 --> 0:15:00.560
<v Speaker 2>in a very lucrative way to this endeavor. If that's gone,

0:15:00.960 --> 0:15:02.120
<v Speaker 2>is Genram gonna be.

0:15:03.760 --> 0:15:06.920
<v Speaker 3>Enticed? Do now? All right?

0:15:07.320 --> 0:15:11.680
<v Speaker 2>My contracts settled, let's go back to let's let's go again. Well,

0:15:11.720 --> 0:15:12.840
<v Speaker 2>let's set sail.

0:15:12.680 --> 0:15:13.480
<v Speaker 3>On this new boat.

0:15:16.120 --> 0:15:19.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm into boat analogies for some reason this morning, that's right.

0:15:20.720 --> 0:15:25.360
<v Speaker 2>So why Lake Erie number one right at Lake in America?

0:15:25.360 --> 0:15:26.560
<v Speaker 2>A corne to stay today?

0:15:27.400 --> 0:15:28.400
<v Speaker 3>Not a real public caation.

0:15:28.520 --> 0:15:31.600
<v Speaker 2>So it's like this, these golden handcuffs with the piff

0:15:31.880 --> 0:15:34.800
<v Speaker 2>right are gone? Is John Ron would be like, well,

0:15:35.200 --> 0:15:39.040
<v Speaker 2>this sort of complex new arrangement I want to get

0:15:39.080 --> 0:15:40.800
<v Speaker 2>in on as well. Let's get back on the Live

0:15:41.080 --> 0:15:43.040
<v Speaker 2>A New boat and go back out to see.

0:15:43.520 --> 0:15:47.840
<v Speaker 3>Can I just talk about where what I find just

0:15:47.960 --> 0:15:49.800
<v Speaker 3>confounding about this whole situation?

0:15:52.480 --> 0:15:52.640
<v Speaker 4>Yes?

0:15:52.760 --> 0:15:53.040
<v Speaker 2>Please?

0:15:54.480 --> 0:15:57.480
<v Speaker 3>So I think Bryson, it seems like Bryson is not

0:15:58.440 --> 0:16:00.680
<v Speaker 3>not going to go back to the tour. He does

0:16:00.800 --> 0:16:02.680
<v Speaker 3>not want to go back to the tour, which I

0:16:02.800 --> 0:16:07.160
<v Speaker 3>get because he he will just be laughed at if

0:16:07.200 --> 0:16:09.760
<v Speaker 3>he goes back to the tour. And at the core

0:16:09.840 --> 0:16:14.200
<v Speaker 3>of Bryson, he wants everybody to love him. And I think,

0:16:14.320 --> 0:16:18.440
<v Speaker 3>like if I was gonna like dig I think Bryson

0:16:18.600 --> 0:16:23.560
<v Speaker 3>is like firmly behind this new idea. I think he

0:16:23.800 --> 0:16:27.400
<v Speaker 3>is like a big part of this because and he's

0:16:27.520 --> 0:16:31.200
<v Speaker 3>trying to extract as much equity and said idea, whether

0:16:31.280 --> 0:16:33.520
<v Speaker 3>it's a good idea or a bad idea, Equity's not

0:16:33.640 --> 0:16:36.200
<v Speaker 3>worth anything if it's a bad idea, and it's gonna

0:16:36.280 --> 0:16:42.240
<v Speaker 3>just flounder. Here's what I don't understand. And like what

0:16:42.360 --> 0:16:47.440
<v Speaker 3>I don't get about any of this Live should go

0:16:47.560 --> 0:16:52.800
<v Speaker 3>to bankruptcy and they should just be done right. And

0:16:52.960 --> 0:16:55.480
<v Speaker 3>why they should do that is that the brand is

0:16:56.200 --> 0:17:02.600
<v Speaker 3>just like extraordinarily toxic. Like at the end of the day,

0:17:02.720 --> 0:17:05.680
<v Speaker 3>you could argue about whether Live is like a good

0:17:05.800 --> 0:17:08.480
<v Speaker 3>product or a bad product, but for the in the

0:17:08.600 --> 0:17:15.600
<v Speaker 3>consumer market, the brand is completely toxic. Would you agree

0:17:15.640 --> 0:17:20.160
<v Speaker 3>with that? Yes? But I okay. So if we say

0:17:20.680 --> 0:17:26.280
<v Speaker 3>the brand is toxic, then that means that people, like,

0:17:26.440 --> 0:17:29.480
<v Speaker 3>no matter what you do over the next like two

0:17:29.640 --> 0:17:33.359
<v Speaker 3>to five to ten years, there are still gonna be

0:17:33.960 --> 0:17:38.680
<v Speaker 3>huge swaths of consumers that just will not engage with

0:17:38.800 --> 0:17:42.560
<v Speaker 3>your brand. And what I don't understand about this whole

0:17:42.720 --> 0:17:48.840
<v Speaker 3>situation is why would anybody, anyone in their right mind

0:17:49.920 --> 0:17:52.840
<v Speaker 3>invest And it doesn't sound like BC partners are investing,

0:17:53.000 --> 0:17:57.480
<v Speaker 3>they're just loading money. But why would anyone invest in

0:17:57.600 --> 0:18:02.960
<v Speaker 3>a brand that is so toxic? So they could do that?

0:18:03.560 --> 0:18:07.400
<v Speaker 3>This is like, this is a free idea. You could

0:18:07.480 --> 0:18:12.920
<v Speaker 3>go buy the Sunshine Tour, which nobody has a negative

0:18:13.440 --> 0:18:18.040
<v Speaker 3>viewpoint of. You could rebrand it and you're away from

0:18:18.200 --> 0:18:22.560
<v Speaker 3>all these contracts, all these like you know, you're away

0:18:22.600 --> 0:18:26.760
<v Speaker 3>from John Rahm being a huge equity holder in your

0:18:26.880 --> 0:18:30.440
<v Speaker 3>company and he doesn't want anything to do with you.

0:18:32.800 --> 0:18:35.720
<v Speaker 3>You could go buy that and put two hundred and

0:18:35.800 --> 0:18:39.840
<v Speaker 3>fifty million dollars into that which doesn't have a brand

0:18:40.119 --> 0:18:43.200
<v Speaker 3>that people have proven not to want to engage with.

0:18:43.840 --> 0:18:48.640
<v Speaker 3>It makes zero sense to try to save live whatsoever

0:18:49.080 --> 0:18:53.800
<v Speaker 3>because of the way that their public image is like.

0:18:54.760 --> 0:18:59.959
<v Speaker 3>So anyways, all these people, all these people Brice It included,

0:19:00.119 --> 0:19:04.200
<v Speaker 3>Scott O'Neill included, Greg Norman included, they're a bunch of

0:19:04.520 --> 0:19:07.040
<v Speaker 3>idiots and they think that you could just like it.

0:19:07.760 --> 0:19:12.080
<v Speaker 3>At the at the end of the day, they tried

0:19:12.119 --> 0:19:16.399
<v Speaker 3>to take on the tour and they lost. Like they

0:19:16.520 --> 0:19:19.879
<v Speaker 3>tried to take on the tour with an insane amount

0:19:19.880 --> 0:19:24.720
<v Speaker 3>of money, five six billion dollars. They tried to just

0:19:24.920 --> 0:19:29.119
<v Speaker 3>throw money and overtake the tour and the thing that

0:19:29.160 --> 0:19:31.480
<v Speaker 3>should be taken away from this and you could have

0:19:31.480 --> 0:19:34.800
<v Speaker 3>had way better strategy than they had. If you want

0:19:34.840 --> 0:19:38.879
<v Speaker 3>to take on the tour, this is a twenty plus

0:19:39.160 --> 0:19:43.359
<v Speaker 3>year game. You need to make slow incremental gains, You

0:19:43.480 --> 0:19:47.600
<v Speaker 3>need to build real fans, you need to like build

0:19:47.840 --> 0:19:51.400
<v Speaker 3>a product, and you could take them on. All these

0:19:51.720 --> 0:19:54.399
<v Speaker 3>idiots that are involved with this just think they can

0:19:54.520 --> 0:20:01.000
<v Speaker 3>win quick with cash and you can't it's so if

0:20:01.040 --> 0:20:04.520
<v Speaker 3>you wanted to actually try and do this, you should go,

0:20:04.960 --> 0:20:08.119
<v Speaker 3>like you have to throw away the live brand. You

0:20:08.240 --> 0:20:11.520
<v Speaker 3>have to start something and actually take a long term

0:20:11.680 --> 0:20:14.560
<v Speaker 3>viewpoint of this is going to take time, but we

0:20:14.640 --> 0:20:18.600
<v Speaker 3>will take them down in twenty years, because you can't

0:20:18.840 --> 0:20:25.280
<v Speaker 3>just overtake. You cannot just topple the longstanding monster brand

0:20:25.359 --> 0:20:28.200
<v Speaker 3>in a space. It just doesn't work that way. It

0:20:28.280 --> 0:20:32.720
<v Speaker 3>took Salesforce decades to take down what was it Seebel

0:20:33.040 --> 0:20:38.360
<v Speaker 3>that they overtook is like the primary customer relationship management software.

0:20:38.880 --> 0:20:41.760
<v Speaker 3>This is not just an overnight thing. You don't just

0:20:42.960 --> 0:20:47.760
<v Speaker 3>and these people are morons. They're complete morons, and they

0:20:47.800 --> 0:20:51.760
<v Speaker 3>don't deserve to run a business. It should go bankrupt

0:20:52.359 --> 0:20:55.200
<v Speaker 3>and all of them should be whisked away. But like,

0:20:55.359 --> 0:20:58.400
<v Speaker 3>if you wanted to actually think about doing this, take

0:20:58.480 --> 0:21:02.200
<v Speaker 3>the two point fifty and buy a brand that people

0:21:02.400 --> 0:21:07.040
<v Speaker 3>don't viscerally hate. Yeah, I mean there's.

0:21:08.400 --> 0:21:14.240
<v Speaker 2>There's it's a bad public image, horror, toxic brand, but

0:21:14.480 --> 0:21:19.960
<v Speaker 2>also it's they've it's a horrible business like that seems

0:21:20.000 --> 0:21:23.360
<v Speaker 2>to cover up the fact that they've they've burned through

0:21:23.640 --> 0:21:29.639
<v Speaker 2>seven six five seven six billion dollars without really making

0:21:29.680 --> 0:21:35.239
<v Speaker 2>anything profitable or or anything of substance lasting even at

0:21:35.240 --> 0:21:39.680
<v Speaker 2>a loss, and and or that's popular or that's useful.

0:21:40.600 --> 0:21:44.760
<v Speaker 2>It's it's not an attractive business proposition. It's not attractive

0:21:44.840 --> 0:21:48.040
<v Speaker 2>branding proposition. Does that mean it's dead? I don't think.

0:21:48.160 --> 0:21:51.720
<v Speaker 2>I don't think so necessary. There might be something that comes,

0:21:51.840 --> 0:21:55.160
<v Speaker 2>but what is the law term? There is no law term.

0:21:55.440 --> 0:21:57.480
<v Speaker 2>So what we've lost the piff and it's gonna be

0:21:57.640 --> 0:22:01.119
<v Speaker 2>better next year. It's gonna have a better chance at survival.

0:22:01.240 --> 0:22:03.840
<v Speaker 2>We've lost John ram Say he leaves and we've gone

0:22:03.840 --> 0:22:06.719
<v Speaker 2>from fourteen to ten events. It's like a Bryson Events

0:22:06.840 --> 0:22:10.360
<v Speaker 2>YouTube tour. Whatever it is, it's gonna be better long

0:22:10.480 --> 0:22:17.040
<v Speaker 2>term chance. Uh maybe at some sort of shelled scaled

0:22:17.160 --> 0:22:21.440
<v Speaker 2>down different product, but not at whatever they these players

0:22:21.560 --> 0:22:24.560
<v Speaker 2>think it is at this current moment or what's being portrayed.

0:22:27.560 --> 0:22:32.600
<v Speaker 2>It's do you think Wednesday this week was good for

0:22:32.680 --> 0:22:35.080
<v Speaker 2>the image, good for the bland. That is a serious

0:22:35.160 --> 0:22:37.080
<v Speaker 2>business and a serious yeah, that's.

0:22:37.000 --> 0:22:41.000
<v Speaker 3>Well, this is the thing, like you do this whole thing,

0:22:41.280 --> 0:22:43.640
<v Speaker 3>and you make this announcement and then it comes out

0:22:43.720 --> 0:22:46.840
<v Speaker 3>that it's like none of this is true. Who wants

0:22:46.920 --> 0:22:51.840
<v Speaker 3>to do business with you who after two days ago

0:22:52.760 --> 0:22:58.479
<v Speaker 3>is like dying to give you real money. The thing

0:22:58.640 --> 0:23:02.600
<v Speaker 3>needs to just it is run its course, and the

0:23:02.720 --> 0:23:07.680
<v Speaker 3>smartest thing they can do is go bankrupt and get

0:23:07.800 --> 0:23:10.240
<v Speaker 3>rid of all these contracts and move on to the

0:23:10.400 --> 0:23:15.640
<v Speaker 3>next thing. Move on this. This is over.

0:23:16.320 --> 0:23:16.800
<v Speaker 5>It's over.

0:23:17.840 --> 0:23:20.879
<v Speaker 3>It's it's not. Yeah, you could keep it going with

0:23:20.960 --> 0:23:24.119
<v Speaker 3>two hundred and fifty million dollars of a two hundred

0:23:24.119 --> 0:23:27.000
<v Speaker 3>and fifty million dollar loan, but all you're doing is

0:23:27.080 --> 0:23:30.480
<v Speaker 3>taking somebody's money with no hope of returning it.

0:23:32.760 --> 0:23:37.320
<v Speaker 2>I enjoyed just to read this lead paragraph from Joe Pompiliano,

0:23:37.480 --> 0:23:41.000
<v Speaker 2>who writes about business. I think now has its own

0:23:41.080 --> 0:23:45.320
<v Speaker 2>stubstack quote. It's not hyperbole to say that live golf

0:23:45.440 --> 0:23:48.480
<v Speaker 2>is one of the least attractive investment opportunities in sports.

0:23:49.280 --> 0:23:52.000
<v Speaker 2>Just think about what you're buying. The organization has hundreds

0:23:52.000 --> 0:23:55.200
<v Speaker 2>of millions and liabilities, no guarantee that its biggest stars

0:23:55.880 --> 0:23:58.040
<v Speaker 2>will be playing there after this year, and its expenses

0:23:58.080 --> 0:23:59.960
<v Speaker 2>are so high that has lost eight dollars and fifty

0:24:00.080 --> 0:24:02.200
<v Speaker 2>the sounds for every one dollar and has invested in

0:24:02.280 --> 0:24:04.720
<v Speaker 2>its product. Even if you wanted to make it work,

0:24:05.160 --> 0:24:08.680
<v Speaker 2>the world's largest Sovereign Wealth Fund has already pumped six

0:24:08.800 --> 0:24:11.240
<v Speaker 2>billion into the project and signed some of the sport's

0:24:11.280 --> 0:24:14.040
<v Speaker 2>biggest names. If that couldn't help Live attract the TV audience,

0:24:14.119 --> 0:24:16.679
<v Speaker 2>what makes you think a smaller investor with a reduced

0:24:16.680 --> 0:24:22.000
<v Speaker 2>schedule in smaller tournament persus will and answer that question

0:24:22.080 --> 0:24:24.000
<v Speaker 2>is maybe they're just looking for a different just a

0:24:24.080 --> 0:24:26.600
<v Speaker 2>different product, and it's not about a TV Maybe it's

0:24:26.600 --> 0:24:29.200
<v Speaker 2>a YouTube body and maybe it's just something smaller. But

0:24:29.440 --> 0:24:33.399
<v Speaker 2>that's not what they're selling right now. It is not

0:24:33.520 --> 0:24:37.320
<v Speaker 2>an attractive investment opportunity in my opinion, which doesn't need

0:24:37.400 --> 0:24:43.800
<v Speaker 2>to carry any weight. But if this, do you think

0:24:43.800 --> 0:24:46.720
<v Speaker 2>they can pull off this miracle? Like say they set

0:24:46.920 --> 0:24:49.639
<v Speaker 2>piff settles, which I think sounds most realistic, piff just

0:24:49.760 --> 0:24:54.040
<v Speaker 2>like settles, the contracts the players, several of them aren't

0:24:54.040 --> 0:24:55.800
<v Speaker 2>going to resign on whatever they do.

0:24:55.960 --> 0:25:01.320
<v Speaker 3>Of Rom's gone, Hatton's gone, Nieman's gone, and at that point,

0:25:01.480 --> 0:25:03.600
<v Speaker 3>like what do you have you have Bryson? Are you

0:25:04.359 --> 0:25:08.359
<v Speaker 3>Are you excited about Bryson backing down Scott Vincent.

0:25:08.440 --> 0:25:11.400
<v Speaker 2>To win like world ranking points? Probably gone, it's gone.

0:25:11.480 --> 0:25:15.240
<v Speaker 2>We're talking about like a some sort of just traveling

0:25:15.320 --> 0:25:16.479
<v Speaker 2>circus type thing.

0:25:17.800 --> 0:25:24.360
<v Speaker 3>I think like they could make a meaningful YouTube presence possibly,

0:25:25.040 --> 0:25:28.359
<v Speaker 3>but at the same time, like do you need two

0:25:28.480 --> 0:25:30.200
<v Speaker 3>hundred and fifty million dollars to do that?

0:25:34.520 --> 0:25:39.880
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, Soopers might say, I'm not an expert. Peach, Peach,

0:25:40.000 --> 0:25:41.840
<v Speaker 2>come in here. I got a question for you. We

0:25:41.920 --> 0:25:44.960
<v Speaker 2>can't withdraw our money from these, Brendan.

0:25:44.720 --> 0:25:49.760
<v Speaker 3>Peach, what do you think is has been Live's greatest

0:25:49.880 --> 0:25:54.280
<v Speaker 3>three moments, and it's where are we at your four

0:25:54.400 --> 0:25:54.760
<v Speaker 3>or five?

0:25:55.440 --> 0:25:58.600
<v Speaker 2>I put Anthony Kim, is it?

0:25:58.680 --> 0:26:00.560
<v Speaker 5>That's that's one for sure.

0:26:00.880 --> 0:26:04.280
<v Speaker 2>Anthony Kim winning against rom and Bryson like kind of nuts.

0:26:04.720 --> 0:26:07.320
<v Speaker 5>I could. I could make an argument that Anthony Kim

0:26:08.040 --> 0:26:09.840
<v Speaker 5>coming out of hibernation is too.

0:26:10.560 --> 0:26:11.200
<v Speaker 2>It's up there.

0:26:14.320 --> 0:26:14.800
<v Speaker 3>I don't know.

0:26:15.520 --> 0:26:18.200
<v Speaker 2>Like the DJ putt at the International in Boston, I

0:26:18.240 --> 0:26:20.800
<v Speaker 2>feel like was a good, nice little moment. I think

0:26:20.840 --> 0:26:23.760
<v Speaker 2>he'd beat Nieman if that's right. That was early in

0:26:23.840 --> 0:26:25.200
<v Speaker 2>the nascent days.

0:26:24.960 --> 0:26:25.520
<v Speaker 4>Of Live.

0:26:27.200 --> 0:26:29.400
<v Speaker 5>Bryson Bryson fifty eight.

0:26:30.359 --> 0:26:34.480
<v Speaker 2>I like Live Adelaide and it's just in general, probably

0:26:34.520 --> 0:26:35.200
<v Speaker 2>a big moment.

0:26:36.680 --> 0:26:40.280
<v Speaker 5>Two guys won majors technically are recounting those.

0:26:41.000 --> 0:26:43.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Brooks and Bryson. Yeah, I could say that, but

0:26:43.920 --> 0:26:46.680
<v Speaker 2>that's not the product itself, that's not live itself.

0:26:47.480 --> 0:26:50.440
<v Speaker 3>What about you doing well? I just wanted to ask

0:26:50.520 --> 0:26:53.440
<v Speaker 3>this question. So I don't know if this is like

0:26:53.600 --> 0:26:56.320
<v Speaker 3>the right comp for the wrong comp here, But like

0:26:57.160 --> 0:27:00.280
<v Speaker 3>if I were gonna if I approach you two and head,

0:27:01.119 --> 0:27:05.359
<v Speaker 3>here's a five billion dollar budget, and I want you

0:27:05.520 --> 0:27:11.280
<v Speaker 3>to make a traveling worldwide concert series, like where you

0:27:11.400 --> 0:27:14.840
<v Speaker 3>have festivals like all over the world and you you

0:27:15.000 --> 0:27:18.639
<v Speaker 3>get to sign up the acts and they're going to

0:27:18.680 --> 0:27:21.840
<v Speaker 3>play all around the world. Do you think if you

0:27:22.000 --> 0:27:25.719
<v Speaker 3>did that, do you think you'd struggle to come up

0:27:25.800 --> 0:27:29.280
<v Speaker 3>with like four big time moments like where we're talking

0:27:29.320 --> 0:27:34.840
<v Speaker 3>about DJ Putt. Like the wild thing about this whole

0:27:34.920 --> 0:27:37.760
<v Speaker 3>thing is like they've spent all this money and they

0:27:37.880 --> 0:27:40.600
<v Speaker 3>deliver like two good moments a year.

0:27:44.800 --> 0:27:45.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:27:45.440 --> 0:27:46.880
<v Speaker 3>Oh, it's it's like they.

0:27:48.680 --> 0:27:51.399
<v Speaker 2>It hasn't generated you know, it has for some you know,

0:27:51.600 --> 0:27:54.080
<v Speaker 2>there are fans out there, but in terms of the

0:27:54.160 --> 0:27:59.320
<v Speaker 2>larger sports zeitgeist, whether it's in America or elsewhere.

0:27:59.280 --> 0:28:00.800
<v Speaker 5>I mean, I don't I don't know how good the

0:28:01.000 --> 0:28:04.920
<v Speaker 5>concerts are, but seems like people enjoy enjoy the post

0:28:05.040 --> 0:28:08.440
<v Speaker 5>round concerts got a lot of cash.

0:28:09.040 --> 0:28:12.720
<v Speaker 2>It seems like the in person experience is quite good,

0:28:13.240 --> 0:28:15.920
<v Speaker 2>quite fun, and enjoyable for people who go to these things.

0:28:16.640 --> 0:28:20.080
<v Speaker 2>I'll give them that based on multiple people, you know,

0:28:21.600 --> 0:28:25.240
<v Speaker 2>kind of unbiased reviews who have gone that they enjoy

0:28:25.840 --> 0:28:29.280
<v Speaker 2>that is enjoyable in a young crowd. But I think

0:28:29.320 --> 0:28:35.400
<v Speaker 2>that depends. It looks like Bedminster's pretty empty this week. Yeah,

0:28:35.560 --> 0:28:38.240
<v Speaker 2>it's it's we'll see where it goes. I just want

0:28:38.320 --> 0:28:41.880
<v Speaker 2>to add one little wrinkle from the day that came

0:28:41.960 --> 0:28:46.560
<v Speaker 2>out was BC Partners and this this totally feels and

0:28:46.880 --> 0:28:49.120
<v Speaker 2>Leamania and I kind of were at this like reading

0:28:49.200 --> 0:28:51.520
<v Speaker 2>between the lines. It seems like Bryson is committed. There

0:28:51.640 --> 0:28:55.440
<v Speaker 2>was this big notion of like in April, you know,

0:28:55.560 --> 0:28:58.480
<v Speaker 2>he's renegotiating with Piff. Then it's like is he going

0:28:58.560 --> 0:29:00.360
<v Speaker 2>to stay on? What does he say? Like, what do

0:29:00.440 --> 0:29:01.760
<v Speaker 2>I want to be at this point in my life?

0:29:01.800 --> 0:29:04.920
<v Speaker 2>Am I a you know, create content creator or am

0:29:04.960 --> 0:29:05.840
<v Speaker 2>I a pro golfer?

0:29:06.760 --> 0:29:06.880
<v Speaker 4>Uh?

0:29:07.960 --> 0:29:10.640
<v Speaker 2>You know, it seems like they were going to maybe

0:29:10.720 --> 0:29:13.520
<v Speaker 2>lose Bryson. Bryson seems committed based on what we've seen

0:29:13.560 --> 0:29:18.000
<v Speaker 2>this week, whether it's leading players meetings, the what sounds

0:29:18.040 --> 0:29:20.920
<v Speaker 2>like could be this two point zero being a little

0:29:20.960 --> 0:29:26.080
<v Speaker 2>bit more Bryson Worldwide Events, YouTube whatever it might be circuit.

0:29:26.800 --> 0:29:26.920
<v Speaker 3>UH.

0:29:27.080 --> 0:29:30.400
<v Speaker 2>It came out that BC Partners as a leading is

0:29:30.520 --> 0:29:33.160
<v Speaker 2>a UH. This was Josh Carpenter, BC as a stake

0:29:33.240 --> 0:29:37.400
<v Speaker 2>in the agency GC GSE Worldwide, which has a large

0:29:37.440 --> 0:29:41.160
<v Speaker 2>group of players on live including Bryson, Deshambeau.

0:29:41.800 --> 0:29:41.920
<v Speaker 6>UH.

0:29:42.120 --> 0:29:46.920
<v Speaker 2>GSSE the agency UH, they represent Bryson and several others

0:29:47.400 --> 0:29:51.560
<v Speaker 2>clarified that to Josh Carpenter by saying, we want to

0:29:51.640 --> 0:29:55.400
<v Speaker 2>provide a clarification regarding BC Partners that are potential financing

0:29:55.560 --> 0:30:00.719
<v Speaker 2>transaction involving live golf. BC Partners acts as a lender

0:30:01.080 --> 0:30:06.680
<v Speaker 2>to GSE. Gatemore Capital holds one hundred percent of the

0:30:06.760 --> 0:30:11.000
<v Speaker 2>companies voting shares. They did not specify what company. It's

0:30:11.160 --> 0:30:13.680
<v Speaker 2>clearly GC is what they mean. It's just for an

0:30:13.680 --> 0:30:17.640
<v Speaker 2>official statement. This is straight from the Tortured Language Department.

0:30:18.200 --> 0:30:21.760
<v Speaker 2>As always, GS continues to operate independently and the best

0:30:21.800 --> 0:30:24.880
<v Speaker 2>interests of our clients. The reported transaction is a matter

0:30:24.920 --> 0:30:27.400
<v Speaker 2>for the parties involved. Neither GS nor gate More we're

0:30:27.400 --> 0:30:30.680
<v Speaker 2>aware of the transaction or are participating in any of

0:30:30.760 --> 0:30:34.640
<v Speaker 2>those discussions. Our focus remains entirely on delivering exceptional service

0:30:34.680 --> 0:30:38.360
<v Speaker 2>to our clients. Takes some effort, but not you know,

0:30:38.520 --> 0:30:41.440
<v Speaker 2>have to be a rocket scientist to read it. But

0:30:41.640 --> 0:30:45.640
<v Speaker 2>it was just tortured language. BC lends money to GSE.

0:30:46.480 --> 0:30:52.000
<v Speaker 2>Gatemore is the you know, parent company or owner and

0:30:52.080 --> 0:30:57.440
<v Speaker 2>operator of GSE, So there is no this lender for

0:30:57.640 --> 0:31:01.320
<v Speaker 2>Live does not have as it was initially portrayed, a

0:31:01.520 --> 0:31:05.240
<v Speaker 2>stake in GSE. It's a lender and Gatemore is sort

0:31:05.280 --> 0:31:10.960
<v Speaker 2>of the owner operator because that would just like gs has,

0:31:11.160 --> 0:31:13.960
<v Speaker 2>you know, at Pinehurst. I'll never forget. Twenty twenty four,

0:31:14.360 --> 0:31:18.080
<v Speaker 2>an agent referred to GSC as quote human traffickers. The

0:31:18.160 --> 0:31:21.160
<v Speaker 2>way they were that may be a little cruel, not

0:31:21.320 --> 0:31:23.760
<v Speaker 2>my words, but the way they were sort of shipping

0:31:23.840 --> 0:31:28.720
<v Speaker 2>their funneling guys to Live the time. But they represent

0:31:28.840 --> 0:31:31.680
<v Speaker 2>PGA tour guys too. Like I'm trying to Sam Burns

0:31:31.720 --> 0:31:34.880
<v Speaker 2>off the top of my head, a GSE client, they

0:31:34.920 --> 0:31:38.200
<v Speaker 2>could not be or some investment arm of GC can't

0:31:38.960 --> 0:31:43.040
<v Speaker 2>be just involved in sort of propping up this new

0:31:43.160 --> 0:31:46.640
<v Speaker 2>tour competitor tour to the PGA tour. So that was

0:31:46.800 --> 0:31:50.160
<v Speaker 2>just but it does seem Bryson driven, whether it's an

0:31:50.200 --> 0:31:53.720
<v Speaker 2>official parent company or official friends of the program capacity.

0:31:54.160 --> 0:31:57.600
<v Speaker 2>Bryson does seem to have a heavy involvement in whatever

0:31:57.760 --> 0:32:00.520
<v Speaker 2>this potential two point zero could be. It's a term

0:32:00.600 --> 0:32:03.240
<v Speaker 2>sheet right now in l o I, or an official

0:32:03.320 --> 0:32:09.160
<v Speaker 2>contract that comes to fruition in September. So that's business minute.

0:32:11.320 --> 0:32:14.320
<v Speaker 3>You. You know, if you wanted to look at this

0:32:14.600 --> 0:32:18.640
<v Speaker 3>from a pair of rose colored glasses or tinted glasses,

0:32:19.600 --> 0:32:23.560
<v Speaker 3>like I have a company for you. Our friends at

0:32:23.680 --> 0:32:29.120
<v Speaker 3>Shady Race, our back they are, and you could look

0:32:29.160 --> 0:32:32.480
<v Speaker 3>at You could see golf better. You could see golf

0:32:32.520 --> 0:32:37.280
<v Speaker 3>in high contrast. They've got their new golf sunglasses with

0:32:37.880 --> 0:32:41.400
<v Speaker 3>high contrasts lenses that help you read pots, see the

0:32:41.480 --> 0:32:46.200
<v Speaker 3>ball better. I see that. You know. I'm struggling in

0:32:46.280 --> 0:32:49.560
<v Speaker 3>my old age to see like long t shots land.

0:32:50.760 --> 0:32:53.880
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah, these things help me. I see them better.

0:32:54.040 --> 0:32:56.160
<v Speaker 3>I can actually like see where the ball lands.

0:32:56.200 --> 0:32:56.400
<v Speaker 4>Again.

0:32:56.480 --> 0:32:59.160
<v Speaker 2>Do you caddy in these at the western end? Do

0:32:59.240 --> 0:33:02.600
<v Speaker 2>you have to chaddy in the Shady Rays? Okay, there

0:33:02.680 --> 0:33:05.360
<v Speaker 2>you go with some young hitters, big hitters. I know

0:33:05.520 --> 0:33:06.920
<v Speaker 2>it's down there at the western end.

0:33:09.120 --> 0:33:09.440
<v Speaker 3>Love that.

0:33:09.640 --> 0:33:11.760
<v Speaker 2>You can go to Shady Rays dot com check out

0:33:11.800 --> 0:33:14.400
<v Speaker 2>their golf collection and grab a pair with their lost

0:33:14.480 --> 0:33:19.680
<v Speaker 2>and broken protection. If you use the code shotgun all

0:33:19.840 --> 0:33:23.719
<v Speaker 2>caps shotgun, you get forty percent off two plus pairs,

0:33:23.760 --> 0:33:25.880
<v Speaker 2>so you gotta have two at a minimum. That could

0:33:26.040 --> 0:33:29.200
<v Speaker 2>do more. It looks like shotgun forty percent off two

0:33:29.240 --> 0:33:34.000
<v Speaker 2>plus pairs of polarized sunglasses with the code shotgun. That's

0:33:34.040 --> 0:33:37.840
<v Speaker 2>Shady rays dot com. Whether it's polarized color USh, whatever

0:33:37.880 --> 0:33:40.200
<v Speaker 2>it is, check out the full full allotment there at

0:33:40.240 --> 0:34:02.880
<v Speaker 2>shady rays dot com. The promo code is shotgun. I

0:34:02.960 --> 0:34:06.000
<v Speaker 2>think that's it for Live Business Minute. It's an interesting

0:34:06.080 --> 0:34:08.560
<v Speaker 2>proposition as we move forward, but I wouldn't say this

0:34:08.680 --> 0:34:11.239
<v Speaker 2>was a positive week. I do think they could get

0:34:11.280 --> 0:34:13.399
<v Speaker 2>guys to come in. There's all sorts of rumors about

0:34:13.440 --> 0:34:17.200
<v Speaker 2>who be floating around the peripheral and jump, but it's

0:34:17.239 --> 0:34:19.080
<v Speaker 2>not a not attractive thing right now.

0:34:19.480 --> 0:34:24.439
<v Speaker 3>I just don't understand why, even in their like, why

0:34:24.600 --> 0:34:29.040
<v Speaker 3>they are even committed to trying to push forward when

0:34:29.080 --> 0:34:33.000
<v Speaker 3>you could just go by. There's plenty of struggling owgr

0:34:33.200 --> 0:34:37.880
<v Speaker 3>accredited tours around the world that you could go purchase

0:34:38.200 --> 0:34:43.840
<v Speaker 3>and rebrand that doesn't have the live like. I just

0:34:43.960 --> 0:34:47.440
<v Speaker 3>think they've done so much damage to to the to

0:34:47.600 --> 0:34:51.160
<v Speaker 3>the golf consumer that you there's no path forward.

0:34:54.280 --> 0:34:58.080
<v Speaker 2>It's a struggle to see it. I think, yeah.

0:34:58.480 --> 0:35:00.959
<v Speaker 3>And at the core of that, if there's no path

0:35:01.040 --> 0:35:07.120
<v Speaker 3>for with the majority of golf consumers, what's the path

0:35:07.200 --> 0:35:08.240
<v Speaker 3>forward for the business?

0:35:10.600 --> 0:35:12.920
<v Speaker 2>I think something will survive. It will just be a

0:35:13.000 --> 0:35:15.880
<v Speaker 2>shell of itself with less players and less events, and

0:35:16.560 --> 0:35:18.880
<v Speaker 2>but they'll be able to say, whether based on pride

0:35:19.000 --> 0:35:23.160
<v Speaker 2>or whatever, that we're still here. I don't know that

0:35:23.239 --> 0:35:26.040
<v Speaker 2>the business will become any more attractive.

0:35:28.360 --> 0:35:28.680
<v Speaker 3>All right?

0:35:28.719 --> 0:35:30.960
<v Speaker 2>Should we bring in Kevin van Volkenberg for a quick

0:35:31.040 --> 0:35:35.600
<v Speaker 2>flashback Friday? President's Cup Flashback Friday? PJ? Is he ready

0:35:36.160 --> 0:35:39.600
<v Speaker 2>and available for Flashback Friday? We're live now on YouTube.

0:35:39.800 --> 0:35:43.000
<v Speaker 5>He's coming in. He doesn't have camera on, so give

0:35:43.040 --> 0:35:43.560
<v Speaker 5>him two minutes.

0:35:43.719 --> 0:35:47.000
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Andy, I want to do a quick quiz here.

0:35:47.160 --> 0:35:50.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm getting prepared for USAM. This will be this will

0:35:50.560 --> 0:35:53.040
<v Speaker 2>be an occasion for you to kind of puff your

0:35:53.120 --> 0:35:56.120
<v Speaker 2>chest out and have a little fun. The USMO is

0:35:56.200 --> 0:35:59.239
<v Speaker 2>digging through the field. Just all the crosshairs on this one,

0:36:00.239 --> 0:36:03.399
<v Speaker 2>age groups where they're from. Who there are all these

0:36:03.480 --> 0:36:03.680
<v Speaker 2>like you?

0:36:03.880 --> 0:36:04.239
<v Speaker 3>Dig it in.

0:36:04.320 --> 0:36:06.399
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna go up to Philly a couple times next week.

0:36:06.440 --> 0:36:06.880
<v Speaker 3>I think.

0:36:08.360 --> 0:36:13.279
<v Speaker 2>There are forty five of fifty states are represented. This

0:36:13.400 --> 0:36:17.680
<v Speaker 2>is just a quick little Friday whimsy quiz. Which five

0:36:17.800 --> 0:36:20.280
<v Speaker 2>states would you guess? Now we only take twenty minutes

0:36:20.320 --> 0:36:21.960
<v Speaker 2>trying to guess, but off the top of your head,

0:36:22.440 --> 0:36:26.800
<v Speaker 2>five states do not have one single representative at the

0:36:26.920 --> 0:36:27.759
<v Speaker 2>USAM next.

0:36:27.800 --> 0:36:30.600
<v Speaker 3>All right, this is great. I mean the obo the

0:36:30.719 --> 0:36:33.040
<v Speaker 3>obvious answer is Alaska.

0:36:33.880 --> 0:36:35.839
<v Speaker 2>That is correct, That is one of five.

0:36:36.920 --> 0:36:40.360
<v Speaker 3>I think then you just immediately go to kind of

0:36:40.520 --> 0:36:41.799
<v Speaker 3>like Montana.

0:36:43.160 --> 0:36:45.919
<v Speaker 2>Montana has won. I went there immediately as well.

0:36:46.320 --> 0:36:50.840
<v Speaker 3>Yes, I think, then you go to the Dakotas. The

0:36:50.920 --> 0:36:55.000
<v Speaker 3>Dakotas each have one. I also went there immediately. Yeah, okay,

0:36:55.560 --> 0:37:00.920
<v Speaker 3>well does each have one? Let's go Delaware. Delaware is correct,

0:37:01.160 --> 0:37:05.399
<v Speaker 3>Delaware and Alaska. You got two of five. Man out

0:37:05.480 --> 0:37:07.560
<v Speaker 3>of my guesses, Well.

0:37:07.440 --> 0:37:09.640
<v Speaker 2>No, I mean you can go unlimited guesses. It took

0:37:09.719 --> 0:37:11.600
<v Speaker 2>me forever to come up with it. The fifth one

0:37:11.719 --> 0:37:17.439
<v Speaker 2>is going to shock you. I'll just say that Wisconsin. Yes,

0:37:19.680 --> 0:37:22.359
<v Speaker 2>you know that was the fifth one. Did I lead

0:37:22.440 --> 0:37:24.160
<v Speaker 2>you there saying you could puff your chair? I could

0:37:24.200 --> 0:37:27.360
<v Speaker 2>not belie it. I'm just thinking about, you know, like

0:37:27.520 --> 0:37:30.160
<v Speaker 2>your golf or what. Yeah, Well, honestly, like.

0:37:32.120 --> 0:37:35.600
<v Speaker 3>I I hate to do this to our fine neighbors

0:37:35.680 --> 0:37:36.160
<v Speaker 3>of the north.

0:37:37.600 --> 0:37:38.120
<v Speaker 2>Sounds like it.

0:37:40.320 --> 0:37:42.680
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I I grew up doing this, you go.

0:37:43.000 --> 0:37:48.480
<v Speaker 3>I never was successful doing it. But like, frankly, there's

0:37:48.800 --> 0:37:52.040
<v Speaker 3>there's just more good golfers in Chicago than Wisconsin.

0:37:52.440 --> 0:37:54.719
<v Speaker 2>And I'm going to get so much blumbers game. That's

0:37:54.760 --> 0:37:55.520
<v Speaker 2>a numbers game.

0:37:55.600 --> 0:38:00.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, yeah, there's a lot of great golf in Wisconsin.

0:38:00.840 --> 0:38:04.359
<v Speaker 3>There's great golfers everywhere all right, but everybody's always looking

0:38:04.360 --> 0:38:06.400
<v Speaker 3>at it. Like if I'm in Chicago, it's like not

0:38:06.560 --> 0:38:09.399
<v Speaker 3>a far drive to go to Wisconsin. But it's also

0:38:09.520 --> 0:38:13.360
<v Speaker 3>not just Chicago. It's Iowa. Like Iowa has like limited

0:38:13.480 --> 0:38:17.879
<v Speaker 3>qualifier site, like limited qualifier spots and always has really

0:38:17.920 --> 0:38:21.600
<v Speaker 3>good players. So it's like you get this influx of

0:38:21.800 --> 0:38:24.480
<v Speaker 3>Iowa and Illinois and then you get people from like

0:38:24.680 --> 0:38:27.680
<v Speaker 3>other places that come in there and it's hard. So

0:38:27.840 --> 0:38:28.759
<v Speaker 3>Wisconsin's won.

0:38:30.840 --> 0:38:35.160
<v Speaker 2>I was shocked by that. So you you've hit Alaska, Wisconsin,

0:38:35.280 --> 0:38:36.000
<v Speaker 2>and Delaware.

0:38:36.440 --> 0:38:37.719
<v Speaker 3>You're on the right path.

0:38:37.800 --> 0:38:42.400
<v Speaker 2>With Montana, big western state with limited limited population.

0:38:44.120 --> 0:38:49.640
<v Speaker 3>Idaho has four. I was shocked by that. Then let's

0:38:49.719 --> 0:38:53.000
<v Speaker 3>go h Louisiana.

0:38:53.600 --> 0:38:55.040
<v Speaker 2>No, Louisiana's got that.

0:38:56.480 --> 0:38:59.880
<v Speaker 3>I'm just trying to think of weird. I went here,

0:39:00.200 --> 0:39:00.600
<v Speaker 3>I did live.

0:39:00.680 --> 0:39:04.120
<v Speaker 2>Hampshire, Maine, New Hampshire each have small amounts. So it's

0:39:04.560 --> 0:39:08.080
<v Speaker 2>Rhode Island and Delaware. You to little states, little states

0:39:08.280 --> 0:39:12.840
<v Speaker 2>Alaska and Wyoming. Alaska and Wyoming are the big states

0:39:12.880 --> 0:39:17.160
<v Speaker 2>with small populations. Rhode Island, Delaware, Alaska, Wyoming. And then

0:39:17.239 --> 0:39:19.800
<v Speaker 2>Wisconsin was the one that just didn't fit with me.

0:39:20.440 --> 0:39:27.480
<v Speaker 2>The code is CODs have more people in Wisconsin, New Mexico, Montana,

0:39:27.719 --> 0:39:29.920
<v Speaker 2>all these plays Hawaii. I guess you know it's a

0:39:30.040 --> 0:39:34.360
<v Speaker 2>warm state. But listen, it's just Wisconsin more of a point.

0:39:35.040 --> 0:39:40.640
<v Speaker 2>Milwaukee's a northern suburb of Chicago. It's just just more,

0:39:41.719 --> 0:39:44.479
<v Speaker 2>you know, just ammo here for the for the take,

0:39:45.239 --> 0:39:46.839
<v Speaker 2>Ohio has more players in the field than.

0:39:46.920 --> 0:39:52.680
<v Speaker 3>Wisconsin's practically just like an amalgam nation of Iowa, minneap

0:39:52.960 --> 0:39:57.279
<v Speaker 3>Minnesota and uh and Illinois. I was going to ask

0:39:57.320 --> 0:40:00.440
<v Speaker 3>you this, this might be the wrong time to asked this.

0:40:02.320 --> 0:40:06.279
<v Speaker 3>How many real cities are there in America? Like real

0:40:06.360 --> 0:40:11.040
<v Speaker 3>cities where like when you leave you're you're not saying, well,

0:40:11.120 --> 0:40:14.919
<v Speaker 3>that's a nice town. Because I do think that town.

0:40:15.120 --> 0:40:18.560
<v Speaker 3>There's there's a lot of nice towns that get get

0:40:18.719 --> 0:40:19.880
<v Speaker 3>named as cities.

0:40:20.840 --> 0:40:24.040
<v Speaker 2>What about it feels like you have one on your

0:40:24.360 --> 0:40:27.400
<v Speaker 2>on your tip your ton. I mean, what's what's an

0:40:27.400 --> 0:40:29.520
<v Speaker 2>example of one that's called the city? But you think

0:40:29.560 --> 0:40:30.319
<v Speaker 2>it's just a town.

0:40:31.160 --> 0:40:36.680
<v Speaker 3>I mean, honestly, what I mean Cleveland?

0:40:36.880 --> 0:40:39.480
<v Speaker 2>I think you're going to say Cleveland, that's.

0:40:39.320 --> 0:40:40.080
<v Speaker 3>Just nice town.

0:40:40.160 --> 0:40:45.040
<v Speaker 2>Accurate. It's got three professional sports teams, it's a massive region,

0:40:46.000 --> 0:40:49.680
<v Speaker 2>it has like an incredibly old like it was a

0:40:49.800 --> 0:40:51.600
<v Speaker 2>top you know, by population.

0:40:52.520 --> 0:40:58.759
<v Speaker 3>Let's not go crazy, Austin, Texas. Nice town m not

0:40:58.880 --> 0:40:59.320
<v Speaker 3>a city.

0:41:00.000 --> 0:41:02.360
<v Speaker 2>I don't know about that. The traffic would say otherwise.

0:41:02.520 --> 0:41:03.800
<v Speaker 2>I think it's pretty populous.

0:41:04.440 --> 0:41:08.600
<v Speaker 3>Boston, Boston, Massachusetts. Sure, okay, nice town.

0:41:08.920 --> 0:41:12.759
<v Speaker 2>This sounds like this sounds like an insane dinner conversation

0:41:12.880 --> 0:41:15.960
<v Speaker 2>you had this week, but you wrapped yourself into some

0:41:16.480 --> 0:41:18.600
<v Speaker 2>bad takes pad positions.

0:41:18.719 --> 0:41:20.279
<v Speaker 3>Teaches on board with me with this.

0:41:20.680 --> 0:41:23.439
<v Speaker 7>I mean, look at this this movie about Boston. What's

0:41:23.480 --> 0:41:27.840
<v Speaker 7>it called the town because it's about Charlestown. It's a

0:41:29.040 --> 0:41:33.040
<v Speaker 7>little small outer borough of north of Boston proper. That's

0:41:33.080 --> 0:41:34.400
<v Speaker 7>why I caught the town.

0:41:34.480 --> 0:41:37.520
<v Speaker 5>Very famous town, very famous Boston movie called The Town.

0:41:38.080 --> 0:41:39.520
<v Speaker 5>Nashville was another option.

0:41:39.719 --> 0:41:45.280
<v Speaker 3>I had nice Town, Nice Town, Nashville. Uh, you got Lston,

0:41:45.640 --> 0:41:49.840
<v Speaker 3>great town. I mean and and I say this like

0:41:50.200 --> 0:41:52.840
<v Speaker 3>sometimes it's better to be a town than a city.

0:41:53.520 --> 0:41:54.720
<v Speaker 2>So what's below town?

0:41:56.000 --> 0:41:56.400
<v Speaker 3>Village?

0:41:56.719 --> 0:41:58.160
<v Speaker 5>Yeah? Gathering?

0:41:58.520 --> 0:42:00.360
<v Speaker 2>So what's the of.

0:42:00.360 --> 0:42:01.279
<v Speaker 3>A village now?

0:42:02.600 --> 0:42:05.839
<v Speaker 2>Like is Jacksonville village? Yeah?

0:42:06.120 --> 0:42:06.319
<v Speaker 5>Jack?

0:42:06.560 --> 0:42:09.399
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if Jacksonville is not anything. I think

0:42:09.480 --> 0:42:13.000
<v Speaker 3>PJ and I we talked about this. I don't We

0:42:13.040 --> 0:42:14.760
<v Speaker 3>don't think Jacksonville is anything.

0:42:14.920 --> 0:42:17.400
<v Speaker 5>There was a lengthy Jacksonville segment.

0:42:17.520 --> 0:42:21.080
<v Speaker 2>You guys are complete clowns. This sounds like a disaster.

0:42:21.400 --> 0:42:23.720
<v Speaker 5>He never answered the question though, of how many cities

0:42:23.760 --> 0:42:24.839
<v Speaker 5>are there in America Reels.

0:42:24.880 --> 0:42:26.560
<v Speaker 3>I would say every every.

0:42:28.719 --> 0:42:31.919
<v Speaker 2>Every city that has a professional sports franchise is a city.

0:42:32.400 --> 0:42:39.520
<v Speaker 2>But in Jacksonville, green Bay is the city. Yes, that's

0:42:39.520 --> 0:42:41.839
<v Speaker 2>a good That's that one almost pucked a hole though

0:42:41.880 --> 0:42:42.120
<v Speaker 2>in my.

0:42:43.719 --> 0:42:46.800
<v Speaker 5>You said yes because you didn't want it to focal.

0:42:47.400 --> 0:42:50.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm a principal, I'm a standing on my corner on principles.

0:42:52.360 --> 0:42:59.160
<v Speaker 3>That's a disingenuous Yes, green Bay genuous. That's started. You

0:42:59.239 --> 0:43:00.120
<v Speaker 3>didn't believe it it.

0:43:01.800 --> 0:43:06.840
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I'd say that's a good test. Professional sports, proper, hospital, proper,

0:43:07.640 --> 0:43:11.360
<v Speaker 2>you know, orchestra universities like things like that, like Cleveland

0:43:11.440 --> 0:43:15.040
<v Speaker 2>has might be a good What are you basing it on?

0:43:15.360 --> 0:43:15.600
<v Speaker 4>PJ?

0:43:16.120 --> 0:43:18.759
<v Speaker 5>We settled on two. The answer was too There are

0:43:18.840 --> 0:43:22.600
<v Speaker 5>two cities in the United States of America, New York

0:43:22.680 --> 0:43:23.240
<v Speaker 5>in Chicago.

0:43:24.040 --> 0:43:25.759
<v Speaker 2>I can't believe the guy from New York and the

0:43:25.800 --> 0:43:28.719
<v Speaker 2>guy from Chicago settled on this at dinner, and now

0:43:28.840 --> 0:43:32.880
<v Speaker 2>we've brought our entire audience into this insane exercise.

0:43:32.960 --> 0:43:35.840
<v Speaker 5>If there was a third, we decided it would be Washington.

0:43:36.480 --> 0:43:38.360
<v Speaker 2>Los Angeles is what just a region?

0:43:39.640 --> 0:43:43.359
<v Speaker 3>Los Angeles? He talked about Los Angeles probably the most. Yes,

0:43:44.200 --> 0:43:46.600
<v Speaker 3>the problem is it's like a city, but it got

0:43:46.760 --> 0:43:52.640
<v Speaker 3>stepped on, so it's too expansive. I'd say it's density

0:43:53.520 --> 0:43:54.719
<v Speaker 3>because it got stepped on.

0:43:55.960 --> 0:43:58.480
<v Speaker 2>Los Angeles is more of like a culture than anything

0:43:58.600 --> 0:43:59.200
<v Speaker 2>than like two.

0:43:59.560 --> 0:44:03.279
<v Speaker 3>You know, now you're getting into it now. Now you're

0:44:03.320 --> 0:44:05.719
<v Speaker 3>starting to see the light of what we're talking about here.

0:44:06.280 --> 0:44:08.759
<v Speaker 3>With that answer, I.

0:44:08.840 --> 0:44:10.960
<v Speaker 2>Think New York I think they might be too big.

0:44:11.120 --> 0:44:13.040
<v Speaker 2>I might go the other way, to be cities.

0:44:13.239 --> 0:44:14.640
<v Speaker 3>Well, then what should they be called? Then?

0:44:14.960 --> 0:44:15.440
<v Speaker 2>A region?

0:44:17.280 --> 0:44:21.360
<v Speaker 3>A region, Like we wanted to give philliate, but people

0:44:21.440 --> 0:44:23.680
<v Speaker 3>commute from Philadelphia to New York.

0:44:24.120 --> 0:44:26.880
<v Speaker 2>That was a black mark Lebron does the reverse.

0:44:27.400 --> 0:44:33.839
<v Speaker 3>Yeah yeah, okay, sob of New York.

0:44:34.920 --> 0:44:37.319
<v Speaker 2>I think they would quibble with that. I think they

0:44:37.480 --> 0:44:38.640
<v Speaker 2>might might take umbrage.

0:44:39.719 --> 0:44:42.080
<v Speaker 5>I mean, that's that's okay, they can take Umbridge.

0:44:42.360 --> 0:44:47.560
<v Speaker 2>Just I think Philly has its own entire culture, history, identity,

0:44:48.320 --> 0:44:51.360
<v Speaker 2>and it's very, very far removed from a suburb of

0:44:51.560 --> 0:44:56.000
<v Speaker 2>New York. If I had to say so, where Philly

0:44:56.160 --> 0:44:59.440
<v Speaker 2>ends and New York begins is probably a bigger, more

0:44:59.480 --> 0:45:04.800
<v Speaker 2>substance conversation. So anyways, all right, I could see you

0:45:04.800 --> 0:45:07.160
<v Speaker 2>guys were busy at the dinner this week in Chicago

0:45:07.280 --> 0:45:10.120
<v Speaker 2>getting get into the heart of the matter. Uh, do

0:45:10.200 --> 0:45:13.560
<v Speaker 2>we have KVV ready for flashback Friday? Okay, that's pretty

0:45:13.600 --> 0:45:17.279
<v Speaker 2>much where KVV stands on this argument. I wonder I'm

0:45:17.280 --> 0:45:19.080
<v Speaker 2>sure it wouldn't be favorable for Baltimore.

0:45:19.520 --> 0:45:21.000
<v Speaker 4>What a disgusting argument.

0:45:21.040 --> 0:45:22.360
<v Speaker 6>First of all, the first thing I hear when I

0:45:22.440 --> 0:45:24.759
<v Speaker 6>come onto the podcast is that Montana isn't going to

0:45:24.840 --> 0:45:28.560
<v Speaker 6>have any representatives in the US, which is disgusting. And

0:45:28.600 --> 0:45:30.959
<v Speaker 6>then I hear that the entire state is filled nothing

0:45:31.000 --> 0:45:36.080
<v Speaker 6>but villages, you know. Yeah, and then Baltimore course doesn't

0:45:36.080 --> 0:45:37.879
<v Speaker 6>going to make the cut. What is That's just a town?

0:45:38.120 --> 0:45:39.920
<v Speaker 3>No chance, Baltimore town.

0:45:41.040 --> 0:45:45.040
<v Speaker 5>We were debating Baltimore suburb of DC. If we gave.

0:45:46.640 --> 0:45:48.000
<v Speaker 3>That. I love hearing that.

0:45:48.320 --> 0:45:51.480
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, Baltimore was a city long before when DC was

0:45:51.480 --> 0:45:55.880
<v Speaker 6>a friggin swamp. PJ, are there anyone? Is anyone actually

0:45:55.920 --> 0:45:59.640
<v Speaker 6>from d C? Like literally, no, just sometimes get people

0:45:59.680 --> 0:46:02.360
<v Speaker 6>from surrounding areas. I don't think Brendan knows a single

0:46:02.400 --> 0:46:03.560
<v Speaker 6>person who's from there.

0:46:04.000 --> 0:46:06.840
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I know a lot of people from Montgomery County, Maryland,

0:46:07.040 --> 0:46:08.120
<v Speaker 2>not necessarily DC.

0:46:08.280 --> 0:46:12.239
<v Speaker 3>I supp okay, I want to reiterate this. I had

0:46:12.320 --> 0:46:15.600
<v Speaker 3>not reiterate bring to the light why this all started.

0:46:16.080 --> 0:46:20.320
<v Speaker 3>This all started because somebody said something about the city,

0:46:21.120 --> 0:46:24.040
<v Speaker 3>you know, and you know, they were talking about Chicago,

0:46:24.280 --> 0:46:28.759
<v Speaker 3>and PJ said, there's only one city, there's only one

0:46:29.000 --> 0:46:33.560
<v Speaker 3>place you can refer to as the city with It

0:46:33.680 --> 0:46:35.919
<v Speaker 3>started with Pj's I don't.

0:46:35.960 --> 0:46:38.279
<v Speaker 5>I don't think that's really how this happened. But but

0:46:38.480 --> 0:46:40.400
<v Speaker 5>sure we can go with that. I stand by my

0:46:40.560 --> 0:46:43.480
<v Speaker 5>take that if you say you're going to the city,

0:46:43.760 --> 0:46:45.680
<v Speaker 5>there's only one city that applies to that.

0:46:46.320 --> 0:46:48.240
<v Speaker 3>No, No, that's not true.

0:46:48.800 --> 0:46:51.520
<v Speaker 2>That's not true. If you're going downtown, does it only

0:46:51.600 --> 0:46:54.080
<v Speaker 2>mean you're going to the financial district. That's only what

0:46:54.160 --> 0:46:54.360
<v Speaker 2>it is.

0:46:54.520 --> 0:46:56.399
<v Speaker 3>You can't go down. You can go to Port Rush

0:46:56.440 --> 0:47:02.799
<v Speaker 3>if you wanted to, I will say, I will say

0:47:02.960 --> 0:47:10.560
<v Speaker 3>New Yorker. PJ yesterday said this remark to me, I'm

0:47:10.680 --> 0:47:16.000
<v Speaker 3>dreaming of that hot honey pepperoni pizza from last night.

0:47:16.160 --> 0:47:17.359
<v Speaker 5>It was a good pizza.

0:47:17.800 --> 0:47:24.359
<v Speaker 3>Dream I'm dreaming of a Chicago style pizza from last night,

0:47:24.719 --> 0:47:28.040
<v Speaker 3>which I actually I've never heard him say any thing

0:47:28.120 --> 0:47:30.840
<v Speaker 3>about dreaming of New York food period pizza.

0:47:32.800 --> 0:47:35.640
<v Speaker 5>So I've had some good pepperoni pizza here to.

0:47:35.719 --> 0:47:38.680
<v Speaker 4>Be clear, or food period.

0:47:38.800 --> 0:47:42.880
<v Speaker 6>I just thought of like gummy bears and sodas and

0:47:43.000 --> 0:47:45.719
<v Speaker 6>such that that's what he survived on, like one of

0:47:45.719 --> 0:47:47.439
<v Speaker 6>those aliens that eat sugar only.

0:47:47.560 --> 0:47:52.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, how about that? How about that? That's pizza Beachi

0:47:53.480 --> 0:47:58.840
<v Speaker 3>uh in West of Chicago. Dreaming has PJA dreaming the

0:47:58.960 --> 0:48:03.439
<v Speaker 3>next day just unprovoked, just playing like the eleventh hole

0:48:04.000 --> 0:48:06.640
<v Speaker 3>of golf and just comes out of his mouth. I'm

0:48:06.760 --> 0:48:09.360
<v Speaker 3>just dreaming of that pizza from last night. It was

0:48:09.480 --> 0:48:09.879
<v Speaker 3>like noon.

0:48:09.960 --> 0:48:11.480
<v Speaker 5>I was hungry. I wanted more pizza.

0:48:11.640 --> 0:48:17.239
<v Speaker 3>It was great. You know, we see it like nine

0:48:17.520 --> 0:48:18.440
<v Speaker 3>fifty in the morning.

0:48:18.480 --> 0:48:19.440
<v Speaker 5>Ever, I was hungry.

0:48:20.000 --> 0:48:22.440
<v Speaker 2>Kvb's out playing golf. Let's get him. Let's get him

0:48:22.480 --> 0:48:23.960
<v Speaker 2>going here. What do you have for us for a

0:48:24.080 --> 0:48:28.360
<v Speaker 2>B Dratty President's Cup Flashback Friday? Of course, B Dratty

0:48:28.520 --> 0:48:30.920
<v Speaker 2>is the proud sponsor of the uniform provider of the

0:48:31.000 --> 0:48:33.719
<v Speaker 2>President's Cup for both teams. I got a little little

0:48:33.760 --> 0:48:37.640
<v Speaker 2>shipment to that this week, Jack lawn Sleeve, Buy it,

0:48:38.080 --> 0:48:42.680
<v Speaker 2>love it, the Jack lawn Sleeve pullover, towartership things money.

0:48:42.800 --> 0:48:45.160
<v Speaker 2>If you're a proud American and want to fly the flag,

0:48:45.480 --> 0:48:47.840
<v Speaker 2>go to B Dratty. Of course, our promo code is

0:48:47.880 --> 0:48:52.839
<v Speaker 2>ACGS thirty. This is a B Dratty President's Cup Flashback Friday, Kevin,

0:48:52.880 --> 0:48:53.680
<v Speaker 2>what do you have for us?

0:48:54.040 --> 0:48:55.880
<v Speaker 6>Well, that's the first Flashback Friday we're doing, you know,

0:48:56.000 --> 0:48:58.480
<v Speaker 6>from the road, from the course, and the reasons will

0:48:58.520 --> 0:49:00.600
<v Speaker 6>be apparent in a second. Guys, I want to take

0:49:00.600 --> 0:49:03.239
<v Speaker 6>you back to the nineteen ninety four President's Cup, the

0:49:03.320 --> 0:49:07.279
<v Speaker 6>original President's Cup, if you will, If you recall, of course,

0:49:07.640 --> 0:49:10.080
<v Speaker 6>the President's Cup is one of these things that the.

0:49:10.080 --> 0:49:12.920
<v Speaker 4>PGA Tour just invented out of nowhere.

0:49:13.480 --> 0:49:16.200
<v Speaker 6>Dean Beeman decided, you know what, we should have one

0:49:16.239 --> 0:49:18.960
<v Speaker 6>of these things that looks resembles the Ryder Cup, and

0:49:19.080 --> 0:49:21.400
<v Speaker 6>not everyone really was thrilled about it.

0:49:21.480 --> 0:49:22.759
<v Speaker 4>Not everyone loved it.

0:49:23.239 --> 0:49:25.360
<v Speaker 2>Trying to make it this podcast existed. You have not

0:49:25.440 --> 0:49:28.560
<v Speaker 2>a scrutiny that would be on this new fangled cup.

0:49:28.880 --> 0:49:30.360
<v Speaker 3>I've been in tuts.

0:49:31.760 --> 0:49:35.640
<v Speaker 6>Tom Kite, who was like a ninth or tenth in

0:49:35.719 --> 0:49:39.160
<v Speaker 6>the points standings, basically said to Captain Hill Or when

0:49:39.200 --> 0:49:41.160
<v Speaker 6>I don't want to play in this, do not pick me,

0:49:42.000 --> 0:49:46.080
<v Speaker 6>and so they passed over him. Sev never won to

0:49:46.719 --> 0:49:49.279
<v Speaker 6>shy away from the microphone, was asked what he thought

0:49:49.280 --> 0:49:52.759
<v Speaker 6>about it, and he said, it's very bad. I think

0:49:53.440 --> 0:49:56.560
<v Speaker 6>it's a rip off essentially of the Ryder Cup. They've

0:49:56.600 --> 0:49:58.800
<v Speaker 6>seen how much money the Ryder Cup is making and

0:49:58.840 --> 0:49:59.800
<v Speaker 6>they're trying to get in on that.

0:50:00.120 --> 0:50:01.359
<v Speaker 4>Don't like imitations.

0:50:02.080 --> 0:50:06.080
<v Speaker 6>Greg Norman declared himself sick ahead of the competition, said

0:50:06.080 --> 0:50:08.560
<v Speaker 6>he had some intestinal thing.

0:50:08.960 --> 0:50:11.080
<v Speaker 4>Ernie Els, yeah.

0:50:11.600 --> 0:50:13.960
<v Speaker 6>Ernie Els said he had a prior commitment that he

0:50:14.000 --> 0:50:16.719
<v Speaker 6>had already committed to play in the Dunhill and so

0:50:16.920 --> 0:50:19.560
<v Speaker 6>he refused to play anyway. So that was kind of

0:50:19.560 --> 0:50:21.080
<v Speaker 6>setting a little bit of the stage about, you know,

0:50:21.320 --> 0:50:23.600
<v Speaker 6>just how serious some of this stuff was going to

0:50:23.640 --> 0:50:26.520
<v Speaker 6>be taken. And the very first day the Americans jumped

0:50:26.560 --> 0:50:30.880
<v Speaker 6>out to a five nothing lead. It was looking like

0:50:31.000 --> 0:50:33.799
<v Speaker 6>it was going to be an absolute blowout. The Internationals

0:50:33.880 --> 0:50:35.759
<v Speaker 6>weren't really much up for the fight. They were there

0:50:35.840 --> 0:50:38.320
<v Speaker 6>two to two through the second session, but then in

0:50:38.360 --> 0:50:40.880
<v Speaker 6>the third session is where things kind of got briefly

0:50:40.880 --> 0:50:44.879
<v Speaker 6>a little bit interesting. The Internationals fought back and won

0:50:45.040 --> 0:50:47.440
<v Speaker 6>three of the five matches. One of the matches that

0:50:47.520 --> 0:50:49.759
<v Speaker 6>turned out to be sort of a key match was

0:50:49.800 --> 0:50:52.719
<v Speaker 6>a match between Bradley Hughes, who had been the replacement

0:50:52.800 --> 0:50:56.640
<v Speaker 6>for Greg Norman and Craig Perry versus Tom Layman and

0:50:56.880 --> 0:51:01.080
<v Speaker 6>Lauren Roberts. Now, as you recall it, Lauren Roberts, nicknamed

0:51:01.120 --> 0:51:05.320
<v Speaker 6>the Boss of the Moss, was known for being a

0:51:05.840 --> 0:51:09.920
<v Speaker 6>i would say, meticulous player. Decided to take his time

0:51:10.640 --> 0:51:14.440
<v Speaker 6>various things, and so not only just around the greens,

0:51:14.480 --> 0:51:19.239
<v Speaker 6>but in general around the holes. So on the twelfth hole,

0:51:19.280 --> 0:51:21.560
<v Speaker 6>which is a par five at Robert Trent Jones Golf Course,

0:51:22.040 --> 0:51:25.040
<v Speaker 6>Roberts was given a warning for slow play saying that

0:51:25.040 --> 0:51:26.960
<v Speaker 6>he had gotten a bad time in the previous hole

0:51:27.800 --> 0:51:29.359
<v Speaker 6>at the end. By the end of the twelfth hole,

0:51:29.680 --> 0:51:31.360
<v Speaker 6>he would take it a long time to sort of

0:51:31.400 --> 0:51:35.440
<v Speaker 6>make a bogie and got a second consecutive bad time.

0:51:36.040 --> 0:51:39.040
<v Speaker 6>So on the thirteenth tee, the official came over and

0:51:39.120 --> 0:51:42.040
<v Speaker 6>informed Lauren Roberts that he had to sit out the

0:51:42.160 --> 0:51:44.920
<v Speaker 6>next hole, that he was suspended from competing in the

0:51:45.040 --> 0:51:47.960
<v Speaker 6>next hole, which is I've never heard before in match

0:51:48.040 --> 0:51:51.040
<v Speaker 6>play before since yeah, Tom Layman had to play the

0:51:51.239 --> 0:51:55.400
<v Speaker 6>next hole all by himself in four ball, and so

0:51:56.160 --> 0:52:00.360
<v Speaker 6>Craig Perry and Bradley Hughes made a birdie insted of

0:52:00.440 --> 0:52:03.560
<v Speaker 6>Tom Layman to go up for the match.

0:52:03.760 --> 0:52:06.239
<v Speaker 2>Just happened this, guys just making it up on the fly.

0:52:06.600 --> 0:52:08.040
<v Speaker 2>Was this in the bylaws?

0:52:08.239 --> 0:52:12.680
<v Speaker 4>That's so I've searched everywhere for like more information about this.

0:52:13.600 --> 0:52:16.600
<v Speaker 6>This only came up to light because Bradley Hughes tweeted

0:52:16.600 --> 0:52:18.880
<v Speaker 6>about it recently or put a post up about Instagram

0:52:18.880 --> 0:52:21.640
<v Speaker 6>about it. Was like, hey, you know, slow play continues

0:52:21.680 --> 0:52:24.400
<v Speaker 6>to be a controversy in golf. You'll never you know,

0:52:24.560 --> 0:52:25.719
<v Speaker 6>you probably never heard this story.

0:52:25.800 --> 0:52:26.040
<v Speaker 3>Whatever.

0:52:26.400 --> 0:52:29.240
<v Speaker 6>This didn't appear in any of the like newspaper stories.

0:52:29.400 --> 0:52:32.080
<v Speaker 6>I messaged Bradley Hughes begged him to come on the

0:52:32.160 --> 0:52:35.440
<v Speaker 6>pod and discuss what happened. Didn't get a response, but

0:52:35.600 --> 0:52:38.680
<v Speaker 6>I just thought that was fascinating that a player was

0:52:38.760 --> 0:52:41.640
<v Speaker 6>forced to sit in the very first President's Cup and

0:52:41.760 --> 0:52:44.440
<v Speaker 6>one that was just generally not being taken seriously by

0:52:44.480 --> 0:52:47.359
<v Speaker 6>half the players, that the officials came out and sat

0:52:47.560 --> 0:52:50.960
<v Speaker 6>Lauren Roberts's ass down on the thirteenth hole so he

0:52:51.040 --> 0:52:52.200
<v Speaker 6>could not participate in that.

0:52:53.000 --> 0:52:55.920
<v Speaker 3>Could you see the TV coverage playing out now, and

0:52:56.040 --> 0:52:59.080
<v Speaker 3>obviously we might go to like three commercials while this

0:52:59.280 --> 0:53:03.480
<v Speaker 3>was going on the camera, the camera is just like

0:53:03.680 --> 0:53:08.760
<v Speaker 3>you see Lord Roberts just arms crossed, like walking along

0:53:08.920 --> 0:53:11.000
<v Speaker 3>like on the car path because he has to sit

0:53:11.160 --> 0:53:14.239
<v Speaker 3>out a strategy.

0:53:14.520 --> 0:53:16.360
<v Speaker 6>I think too, I think this should be more often

0:53:16.560 --> 0:53:19.200
<v Speaker 6>enforced in these matching I really wonder if he was

0:53:19.239 --> 0:53:21.359
<v Speaker 6>he allowed to like consult with Layman at all, could

0:53:21.400 --> 0:53:22.560
<v Speaker 6>he help read a putt?

0:53:22.640 --> 0:53:24.680
<v Speaker 4>Or do you just have to like be removed entirely.

0:53:24.480 --> 0:53:26.719
<v Speaker 6>Like the baseball managers and they get thrown out of

0:53:26.760 --> 0:53:28.600
<v Speaker 6>the game, They're not allowed to like, you know, signal

0:53:28.640 --> 0:53:29.720
<v Speaker 6>any strategy or anything.

0:53:30.239 --> 0:53:33.799
<v Speaker 2>So that's amazing that's a great flashback, Katie. I really

0:53:33.840 --> 0:53:37.360
<v Speaker 2>appreciate you calling him from the I have no recollection.

0:53:37.000 --> 0:53:38.480
<v Speaker 4>Of as a as a tribute.

0:53:38.520 --> 0:53:42.040
<v Speaker 6>I've sat out the last holesary you.

0:53:42.120 --> 0:53:46.040
<v Speaker 2>Had to indulge the state town town village debate while

0:53:46.080 --> 0:53:47.080
<v Speaker 2>you are in the middle of your.

0:53:47.000 --> 0:53:50.800
<v Speaker 3>Golf I also wanted to just just let you know

0:53:51.920 --> 0:53:58.919
<v Speaker 3>that yesterday on my college Buddies tax chain that play golf,

0:54:00.040 --> 0:54:03.040
<v Speaker 3>one of my buddies said, I started watching The Hawk.

0:54:03.239 --> 0:54:06.680
<v Speaker 3>I'm really enjoying it. And then your piece this morning

0:54:06.840 --> 0:54:12.640
<v Speaker 3>about the Hawk has fostered debate in the text Chaine

0:54:12.920 --> 0:54:17.600
<v Speaker 3>about the Hawk and the marriage with with diverse opinions

0:54:17.640 --> 0:54:18.480
<v Speaker 3>on both sides.

0:54:19.040 --> 0:54:21.040
<v Speaker 6>Well, that's that makes for a good article. Then, right,

0:54:21.120 --> 0:54:25.560
<v Speaker 6>we've stirred up debate. Perhaps I need to drop into

0:54:25.600 --> 0:54:27.240
<v Speaker 6>your text thread and defend my take.

0:54:27.120 --> 0:54:27.520
<v Speaker 5>A little bit.

0:54:27.560 --> 0:54:30.839
<v Speaker 3>Well business Pete dropped in this morning and said, Chad,

0:54:30.880 --> 0:54:33.080
<v Speaker 3>you might not want to want to want to read

0:54:35.200 --> 0:54:35.800
<v Speaker 3>this morning.

0:54:37.960 --> 0:54:42.239
<v Speaker 2>Well, I mean, yeah, whatever, this isn't it like number

0:54:42.280 --> 0:54:44.960
<v Speaker 2>two on Netflix some of the most popular shows the district.

0:54:45.480 --> 0:54:49.520
<v Speaker 6>Probably another another season of The Hawk. You know, there's

0:54:49.560 --> 0:54:52.320
<v Speaker 6>a couple of parts here and there that have a

0:54:52.840 --> 0:54:55.480
<v Speaker 6>little bit of charm, but mostly it's just incredibly stupid.

0:54:55.680 --> 0:54:58.040
<v Speaker 2>Sometimes we like to eat the trash, eat the garbage.

0:54:58.200 --> 0:55:00.520
<v Speaker 2>We like to eat that in the America. Like's just

0:55:00.719 --> 0:55:02.399
<v Speaker 2>enjoying it, all right, Kevin, I don't want to hold

0:55:02.440 --> 0:55:02.640
<v Speaker 2>you up.

0:55:03.680 --> 0:55:08.120
<v Speaker 3>One of the comments from one one one person who

0:55:08.200 --> 0:55:12.239
<v Speaker 3>watched one episode said, I'm still bad about Happy Gilmore too.

0:55:13.239 --> 0:55:16.640
<v Speaker 3>I mean that's yeah.

0:55:17.800 --> 0:55:20.520
<v Speaker 4>Check out the newsletter. There's a long time. It takes

0:55:20.960 --> 0:55:22.320
<v Speaker 4>good and bad regularly.

0:55:23.239 --> 0:55:25.359
<v Speaker 2>Kevin, thank you for joining us. Get back to a round.

0:55:25.560 --> 0:55:27.719
<v Speaker 2>What a little tidbit about the boss of the loss

0:55:27.760 --> 0:55:28.480
<v Speaker 2>having to sit out?

0:55:28.680 --> 0:55:29.080
<v Speaker 3>All right?

0:55:29.760 --> 0:55:32.480
<v Speaker 2>Ah god, it's amazing looking back at that ninety four. No,

0:55:32.719 --> 0:55:34.919
<v Speaker 2>Ernie is kind of a black mark on Earth. Of course,

0:55:34.960 --> 0:55:38.680
<v Speaker 2>now he's become sorry mark on Ernie skippy.

0:55:38.800 --> 0:55:42.520
<v Speaker 3>It this is this is a this is this is

0:55:42.640 --> 0:55:46.520
<v Speaker 3>him standing up to the PGA tours, medaling and making

0:55:46.640 --> 0:55:48.920
<v Speaker 3>up Sure. This is something we talk about on this

0:55:49.040 --> 0:55:51.719
<v Speaker 3>podcast all the time. Look at this. Look at this.

0:55:51.840 --> 0:55:54.680
<v Speaker 3>Once the money drives up, Memphis is just being kicked

0:55:54.719 --> 0:55:57.959
<v Speaker 3>at the curb. It's a perfect example of the PGA tour.

0:55:58.360 --> 0:56:00.680
<v Speaker 2>Well, now he's the uh as the creator of the

0:56:00.760 --> 0:56:02.840
<v Speaker 2>shield and sort of the unifying try. I think he

0:56:02.920 --> 0:56:06.239
<v Speaker 2>still has misgivings about the tour operating both sides of

0:56:06.239 --> 0:56:08.680
<v Speaker 2>the equation at the peak up if I'm not mistaken,

0:56:08.880 --> 0:56:10.680
<v Speaker 2>or at least that's what he seemed to voice in

0:56:10.760 --> 0:56:15.600
<v Speaker 2>Melbourne in twenty nineteen. Did you want to talk about

0:56:15.640 --> 0:56:18.400
<v Speaker 2>FedEx at all? Joseph and I talked now frequently.

0:56:18.440 --> 0:56:21.759
<v Speaker 3>I mean, this is just classic tour, right. They tell

0:56:21.840 --> 0:56:25.560
<v Speaker 3>us Memphis is important, such a great event, and then

0:56:25.560 --> 0:56:27.799
<v Speaker 3>as soon as the money drives up, it's just they

0:56:27.920 --> 0:56:30.040
<v Speaker 3>just kick it to the curb, which I get from

0:56:30.080 --> 0:56:33.680
<v Speaker 3>a business standpoint, But but don't you know, it's just

0:56:34.040 --> 0:56:36.640
<v Speaker 3>it's just the classic. Don't piss on me and tell

0:56:36.719 --> 0:56:37.360
<v Speaker 3>me it's raining.

0:56:38.520 --> 0:56:40.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure the money dried up as much as

0:56:40.719 --> 0:56:42.640
<v Speaker 2>the tour said, we don't want to do.

0:56:42.719 --> 0:56:45.719
<v Speaker 3>This any For the past decade, they've been telling us

0:56:45.760 --> 0:56:48.400
<v Speaker 3>how out spectacular Memphis is.

0:56:49.080 --> 0:56:54.600
<v Speaker 2>Well, yeah, I mean it's like on Wednesday show. Subtext

0:56:54.680 --> 0:56:56.840
<v Speaker 2>of this and I don't mean this in a callous ways.

0:56:56.920 --> 0:56:59.920
<v Speaker 2>Like the death of Fred Smith, the chairman and found

0:57:00.080 --> 0:57:04.000
<v Speaker 2>or FedEx in the past year, played a role, probably

0:57:04.640 --> 0:57:08.560
<v Speaker 2>whether subconsciously or not, as someone who is, you know,

0:57:08.760 --> 0:57:11.720
<v Speaker 2>an important figure in FedEx being associated with the PGA

0:57:11.840 --> 0:57:14.680
<v Speaker 2>tour makes it easier for both sides to re examine

0:57:14.880 --> 0:57:19.400
<v Speaker 2>the relationship. Probably, but it seems like the tour sort

0:57:19.440 --> 0:57:22.640
<v Speaker 2>of kind of strutted in and be like, no, but

0:57:22.800 --> 0:57:25.240
<v Speaker 2>you're right. They've been telling us for years that this

0:57:25.440 --> 0:57:28.320
<v Speaker 2>is all this is a great thing August, this is

0:57:28.400 --> 0:57:30.320
<v Speaker 2>the place to be in August, and this needs to

0:57:30.320 --> 0:57:33.520
<v Speaker 2>be elevated even further. And you know, Jay Monahan, as

0:57:33.520 --> 0:57:36.040
<v Speaker 2>I said on Wednesday, was like, came short of driving

0:57:36.080 --> 0:57:38.120
<v Speaker 2>a FedEx. It was just an inch short of driving

0:57:38.160 --> 0:57:41.800
<v Speaker 2>a FedEx truck around. They were just that was their

0:57:41.920 --> 0:57:45.320
<v Speaker 2>sugar daddy. And now it's like, well, no, maybe for

0:57:45.680 --> 0:57:47.560
<v Speaker 2>the sake of our own product, we're not going to

0:57:47.640 --> 0:57:52.440
<v Speaker 2>do this anymore. But we'll see if FedEx goes away

0:57:52.480 --> 0:57:55.760
<v Speaker 2>as an umbrella of like the whole deal, the teams like.

0:57:55.800 --> 0:57:56.600
<v Speaker 3>That's going to happen.

0:57:56.800 --> 0:58:01.160
<v Speaker 2>That's that for me is the more significant significant news.

0:58:01.280 --> 0:58:05.000
<v Speaker 2>Then everyone coming to realization Memphis maybe isn't what where

0:58:05.040 --> 0:58:07.480
<v Speaker 2>it should be at a for a consequential event late

0:58:07.480 --> 0:58:11.720
<v Speaker 2>in the season. All right, I don't have much else.

0:58:12.480 --> 0:58:18.600
<v Speaker 2>Uh Wyndham quick checking the Bow Show sixty one at

0:58:18.680 --> 0:58:22.120
<v Speaker 2>the Wyndham Championship. Jackson Coyven if he, you know, would

0:58:22.120 --> 0:58:25.439
<v Speaker 2>got sony five percent of the tournament to play. Still,

0:58:25.640 --> 0:58:29.240
<v Speaker 2>essentially he would knock out Jackson Coavin from the playoffs.

0:58:29.360 --> 0:58:32.720
<v Speaker 2>Bow Show, who hasn't won and is two hundred This

0:58:32.880 --> 0:58:36.840
<v Speaker 2>is two hundred and fifty second start on tour. It

0:58:37.000 --> 0:58:42.240
<v Speaker 2>goes Patrick Rogers, Mark Hubbard, two hundred and eighty two starts.

0:58:42.320 --> 0:58:46.240
<v Speaker 2>Bo Hostler, do fifty one are your most starts? He's

0:58:46.280 --> 0:58:48.680
<v Speaker 2>made fifteen million dollars. I remember when Bo Show was

0:58:49.400 --> 0:58:52.760
<v Speaker 2>at Olympic. I remember that he was like, God, this guy,

0:58:52.960 --> 0:58:57.680
<v Speaker 2>this kid. Essentially now he's thirty one, world being amazing.

0:58:57.880 --> 0:58:59.920
<v Speaker 2>I did an interview with Stu Hagistad when he was

0:59:00.000 --> 0:59:04.000
<v Speaker 2>going to the Masters first his first Midam. I believe

0:59:04.000 --> 0:59:06.920
<v Speaker 2>that would have been like twenty seventeen Masters, twenty sixteen Midam,

0:59:08.080 --> 0:59:10.000
<v Speaker 2>and he talked about like growing up in California and

0:59:10.080 --> 0:59:12.920
<v Speaker 2>having to like play junior golf against Bo Hostler. It

0:59:13.040 --> 0:59:15.120
<v Speaker 2>was just like and can't they would be one too?

0:59:15.400 --> 0:59:18.200
<v Speaker 2>But he specifically cited Hostlers like this demon. I think

0:59:18.240 --> 0:59:20.080
<v Speaker 2>he's probably a little younger than Stu too.

0:59:21.520 --> 0:59:25.400
<v Speaker 3>Did you see the picture that the Western Am tweeted

0:59:25.560 --> 0:59:28.360
<v Speaker 3>from the last time they were at Beverly. You know

0:59:29.640 --> 0:59:34.680
<v Speaker 3>we won where Hostler won. Yeah, Xander, No, I didn't

0:59:34.680 --> 0:59:40.080
<v Speaker 3>see the picture, so they posted a picture. I'm trying

0:59:40.160 --> 0:59:43.480
<v Speaker 3>to trying to find it now. But you know that

0:59:43.760 --> 0:59:50.760
<v Speaker 3>that Western am Sweet sixteen had like an insane you know,

0:59:50.880 --> 0:59:53.160
<v Speaker 3>everybody goes to the Walker Cup team, right, and this

0:59:53.360 --> 0:59:55.919
<v Speaker 3>was around the same time as the Walker Cup team,

0:59:56.440 --> 1:00:00.120
<v Speaker 3>but they took tweeted a picture of the of the

1:00:01.400 --> 1:00:04.320
<v Speaker 3>of all the Sweet sixteen guys. You had Xander, you

1:00:04.440 --> 1:00:10.600
<v Speaker 3>had Bo Hostler, you had Scottie Scheffler. Like, it's it's

1:00:10.760 --> 1:00:15.040
<v Speaker 3>just wild the list. But there's been like eight major championships,

1:00:15.080 --> 1:00:19.000
<v Speaker 3>I think fifty PGA Tour titles from that Sweet sixteen.

1:00:20.160 --> 1:00:22.320
<v Speaker 3>It's just nuts when you when you zoom out. But

1:00:22.440 --> 1:00:25.840
<v Speaker 3>Bo Hostler being none of those at that time would

1:00:25.880 --> 1:00:27.720
<v Speaker 3>be an insane thing.

1:00:28.480 --> 1:00:31.320
<v Speaker 2>It's it's nuts, man, And I don't want to say

1:00:31.400 --> 1:00:34.280
<v Speaker 2>like he is. He had the same amateur career as

1:00:34.360 --> 1:00:37.840
<v Speaker 2>Jackson Coven. Coiven had it all tied like, but he

1:00:38.120 --> 1:00:42.400
<v Speaker 2>was a stud Valley Huod from junior amateur and like

1:00:42.720 --> 1:00:45.800
<v Speaker 2>you have this odd deal where he could knock Coven

1:00:45.840 --> 1:00:48.520
<v Speaker 2>out of the playoffs. You know, this is if the

1:00:48.600 --> 1:00:53.480
<v Speaker 2>next three days go well, and like a legit stut

1:00:53.880 --> 1:01:00.560
<v Speaker 2>forever forever, junior college, amateur, it coven wins start three,

1:01:00.680 --> 1:01:03.040
<v Speaker 2>and here we have Bo the Bow Show, two hundred

1:01:03.040 --> 1:01:06.840
<v Speaker 2>and fifty two starts and whatever. Fourteen thirteen years later,

1:01:07.680 --> 1:01:08.640
<v Speaker 2>still looking for one.

1:01:10.960 --> 1:01:14.400
<v Speaker 3>It's it's wild. It's hard, man, it's hard. It also

1:01:14.560 --> 1:01:18.720
<v Speaker 3>goes to that the just the keeping in mind, whoever

1:01:18.840 --> 1:01:22.600
<v Speaker 3>is the best at fifteen's rarely the best at eighteen.

1:01:22.680 --> 1:01:25.600
<v Speaker 3>Whoever's the best at eighteen's rarely the best at twenty two.

1:01:26.000 --> 1:01:28.360
<v Speaker 3>Whoever's the best of twenty two is rarely the best

1:01:28.400 --> 1:01:32.800
<v Speaker 3>of twenty seven. And like that's the way golf works.

1:01:33.240 --> 1:01:37.040
<v Speaker 3>And there's occasionally, like insane outliers that are the best

1:01:37.160 --> 1:01:40.720
<v Speaker 3>the whole way, but it's almost never the case. And

1:01:40.840 --> 1:01:44.320
<v Speaker 3>you could look at it right now, it's like unequivocally,

1:01:45.320 --> 1:01:49.600
<v Speaker 3>you know, Jordan Speeth was the best at age sixteen

1:01:50.200 --> 1:01:54.600
<v Speaker 3>eighteen twenty one. Then I think JT was the best

1:01:54.640 --> 1:01:57.240
<v Speaker 3>at twenty five in that same age group, and now

1:01:57.440 --> 1:01:59.120
<v Speaker 3>Xander's the best at age thirty.

1:02:00.840 --> 1:02:03.280
<v Speaker 2>She speaks first, he shot yesterday, he.

1:02:03.320 --> 1:02:07.760
<v Speaker 3>Shot sixty eight. Everybody frame, all the speed legions. You know,

1:02:07.960 --> 1:02:11.880
<v Speaker 3>back around Battle. That's a great, great spot for speed.

1:02:12.320 --> 1:02:14.880
<v Speaker 3>You know when that's kind of speed's kind of ballpark.

1:02:15.920 --> 1:02:19.760
<v Speaker 3>I love hitting taking iron up first t going O B.

1:02:19.880 --> 1:02:22.040
<v Speaker 3>And then you're like f it going yeah, go on

1:02:22.200 --> 1:02:27.800
<v Speaker 3>driver talk the griller. Oh hit iron, hit the cart

1:02:27.880 --> 1:02:31.360
<v Speaker 3>path O B. That's a shame, honestly. All right.

1:02:31.480 --> 1:02:34.160
<v Speaker 2>That does it for another week on the Shotguns, start

1:02:34.480 --> 1:02:38.960
<v Speaker 2>Friday episode Friday Morning Whimsay with the side of business.

1:02:39.680 --> 1:02:41.440
<v Speaker 2>We will talk to you on Monday, wrap up the

1:02:41.480 --> 1:02:45.720
<v Speaker 2>regular season at the window, prepare ourselves for Memphis, and

1:02:45.800 --> 1:02:50.040
<v Speaker 2>probably more more significantly, the US Amateur and Marion talked

1:02:50.080 --> 1:02:53.600
<v Speaker 2>more about that, not just states quizzes on Monday, talk

1:02:53.640 --> 1:02:54.040
<v Speaker 2>to you then

1:03:00.840 --> 1:03:08.760
<v Speaker 5>Instant product posts and st