WEBVTT - The ETF Story 2: The Report

0:00:02.920 --> 0:00:05.240
<v Speaker 1>The market has been going up for a while. Nothing

0:00:05.240 --> 0:00:08.000
<v Speaker 1>goes up forever. If you have been away from your

0:00:08.000 --> 0:00:10.720
<v Speaker 1>television set and haven't heard about the stock market, this

0:00:10.920 --> 0:00:14.920
<v Speaker 1>was it. The market declined to practice. It was probably

0:00:15.000 --> 0:00:17.160
<v Speaker 1>the scariest time of when in my sixteen years to

0:00:17.200 --> 0:00:20.880
<v Speaker 1>the SEC that Monday and into Tuesday. But the idea

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:26.560
<v Speaker 1>was to create a factual reconstruction of what happened. Meanwhile,

0:00:26.840 --> 0:00:29.320
<v Speaker 1>in downtown New York you had the American Stock Exchange

0:00:29.440 --> 0:00:32.720
<v Speaker 1>and that's where Nate Most and Steve Bloom we're working together.

0:00:32.960 --> 0:00:36.559
<v Speaker 1>These are market nerds. So we were hoping that day

0:00:36.560 --> 0:00:39.839
<v Speaker 1>would take debate, so to speak, and the m X did.

0:00:49.000 --> 0:00:52.960
<v Speaker 1>This is Tralians Presents. I'm Joel Weber. Over the course

0:00:53.000 --> 0:00:55.400
<v Speaker 1>of this podcast, we're going to be sharing the story

0:00:55.480 --> 0:00:58.840
<v Speaker 1>behind the e t F. In our first episode, we

0:00:58.960 --> 0:01:03.240
<v Speaker 1>got into what happened on October nineteenth, or Black Monday,

0:01:03.360 --> 0:01:06.320
<v Speaker 1>when the stock market crash. Every American at this day

0:01:06.360 --> 0:01:09.600
<v Speaker 1>of the game needs to get the house in order

0:01:09.720 --> 0:01:12.280
<v Speaker 1>and also the response of the federal government and regulators.

0:01:12.360 --> 0:01:16.440
<v Speaker 1>I'd say for the next three months through early January,

0:01:16.480 --> 0:01:18.720
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of us had two jobs, which was, you know,

0:01:18.760 --> 0:01:21.759
<v Speaker 1>investigating what happened and writing the report up and doing

0:01:21.760 --> 0:01:23.640
<v Speaker 1>our day job. So the FEDS want to make sure

0:01:23.640 --> 0:01:26.520
<v Speaker 1>this never happens again, and the SEC starts digging to

0:01:26.520 --> 0:01:29.039
<v Speaker 1>find answers and a way to prevent another crash like

0:01:29.080 --> 0:01:31.759
<v Speaker 1>this one, which brings us back to these two guys,

0:01:32.240 --> 0:01:35.319
<v Speaker 1>Nathan Most and Stephen Bloom. Nate Most was in his

0:01:35.400 --> 0:01:38.400
<v Speaker 1>seventies with the background in physics and commodities trading, among

0:01:38.480 --> 0:01:41.440
<v Speaker 1>other things. And then there's Stephen Bloom who at twenty

0:01:41.480 --> 0:01:44.360
<v Speaker 1>seven was fresh out of Harvard with the PhD in economics,

0:01:44.880 --> 0:01:46.680
<v Speaker 1>and the two of them were teamed up at AMS

0:01:46.840 --> 0:01:49.600
<v Speaker 1>to create innovative products for the exchange. They had just

0:01:49.680 --> 0:01:53.800
<v Speaker 1>read the SEC Market break Report, and we're beginning to

0:01:53.800 --> 0:01:56.960
<v Speaker 1>toy with an idea for a new financial tool, one

0:01:57.000 --> 0:01:59.200
<v Speaker 1>modeled after a section that they'd read in the report.

0:02:03.320 --> 0:02:06.520
<v Speaker 1>What the SEC effectively did was to provide the sketch, right,

0:02:06.560 --> 0:02:10.040
<v Speaker 1>It's almost like drawing on paper of what they would

0:02:10.240 --> 0:02:13.440
<v Speaker 1>envision as a market basket instrument. So what Most in

0:02:13.480 --> 0:02:16.440
<v Speaker 1>Bloom did was to take this sketch and fill out

0:02:16.440 --> 0:02:18.280
<v Speaker 1>all the colors, make it into sort of a full

0:02:18.280 --> 0:02:20.680
<v Speaker 1>blown painting, if you will. But instead of a painting.

0:02:20.680 --> 0:02:23.600
<v Speaker 1>It was a legit product that was given back to

0:02:23.600 --> 0:02:26.560
<v Speaker 1>the SEC that was above and beyond what they initially

0:02:26.600 --> 0:02:30.520
<v Speaker 1>put down in their sketch. And here's that initial sketch

0:02:30.760 --> 0:02:33.079
<v Speaker 1>read by one of its artists who you'll remember from

0:02:33.080 --> 0:02:37.000
<v Speaker 1>episode one, the secs, Howard Kramer. We suggest that an

0:02:37.040 --> 0:02:41.120
<v Speaker 1>alternative approach be examined. Presently, program trades must be broken

0:02:41.200 --> 0:02:43.919
<v Speaker 1>up and distributed around the stock floor, with the resulting

0:02:43.960 --> 0:02:48.400
<v Speaker 1>substantial transaction costs and effects discussed above. The creation, however,

0:02:48.560 --> 0:02:51.520
<v Speaker 1>of one or more posts where the actual market baskets

0:02:51.560 --> 0:02:54.960
<v Speaker 1>could be traded, might alter the dynamics of program trading.

0:02:55.240 --> 0:02:57.840
<v Speaker 1>The availability of basket trading on the n y C

0:02:58.320 --> 0:03:01.760
<v Speaker 1>would in effect restore program trades two more traditional block

0:03:01.800 --> 0:03:05.120
<v Speaker 1>trading techniques. The basket specialists would be able to identify

0:03:05.240 --> 0:03:07.680
<v Speaker 1>the nature of each trade. We are hopeful that this

0:03:07.720 --> 0:03:11.160
<v Speaker 1>would encourage block positioners to again become active in providing

0:03:11.200 --> 0:03:15.600
<v Speaker 1>capital to position the program blocks, while arbitrage would continue

0:03:15.639 --> 0:03:18.440
<v Speaker 1>to flow directly to the individual stocks to maintain their

0:03:18.480 --> 0:03:22.400
<v Speaker 1>pricing efficiency. Other institutional trades could be focused on the

0:03:22.440 --> 0:03:25.840
<v Speaker 1>basket posts, where the specialists and trade and crowd could

0:03:25.840 --> 0:03:29.480
<v Speaker 1>provide an additional layer of liquidity to the system and

0:03:29.520 --> 0:03:33.200
<v Speaker 1>cushioned somewhat the individual stocks from the intra day volatility

0:03:33.280 --> 0:03:37.560
<v Speaker 1>caused by program activity. Okay, that was a little dense, Eric,

0:03:37.680 --> 0:03:39.480
<v Speaker 1>Can you help us make sense of what that means.

0:03:39.760 --> 0:03:42.720
<v Speaker 1>What they're basically outlining here is, Look, you're gonna have

0:03:42.760 --> 0:03:45.000
<v Speaker 1>a product that represents a bunch of stocks, it's gonna

0:03:45.000 --> 0:03:47.840
<v Speaker 1>be traded by market makers, and it's gonna be physically

0:03:47.880 --> 0:03:54.560
<v Speaker 1>backed after the SEC publishes this thing. Grammer says he

0:03:54.600 --> 0:03:57.560
<v Speaker 1>remembers getting a slew of phone calls about the report.

0:03:57.760 --> 0:04:00.200
<v Speaker 1>The report came out with some time in early eighty eight,

0:04:00.320 --> 0:04:04.040
<v Speaker 1>so I'm guessing, you know, just just a guess, you know,

0:04:04.560 --> 0:04:06.760
<v Speaker 1>six months later, eight months later or something like that.

0:04:06.880 --> 0:04:10.120
<v Speaker 1>Then he hears from most in Bloom and they're like, hey,

0:04:10.120 --> 0:04:13.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, we we noticed that you have this suggestion

0:04:13.920 --> 0:04:16.560
<v Speaker 1>in the report, and we'd like to hear a little

0:04:16.560 --> 0:04:19.240
<v Speaker 1>bit more about it. And there are some discussions back

0:04:19.240 --> 0:04:22.880
<v Speaker 1>and forth. I highly respected name Moos and Steve Bloom.

0:04:23.000 --> 0:04:25.560
<v Speaker 1>They were rocket scientists at that time and in that

0:04:25.720 --> 0:04:28.200
<v Speaker 1>sense of the word, and they were really good at

0:04:28.200 --> 0:04:33.240
<v Speaker 1>and adapted developing the products. Myself and others in the

0:04:33.320 --> 0:04:36.320
<v Speaker 1>division had some discussions, and at some point, I don't

0:04:36.320 --> 0:04:40.359
<v Speaker 1>remember when, they probably sent in a draft prototype and

0:04:40.400 --> 0:04:43.200
<v Speaker 1>or draft of what they were talking about. Creamer and

0:04:43.200 --> 0:04:45.800
<v Speaker 1>the others at the SEC are not the only ones

0:04:45.880 --> 0:04:50.160
<v Speaker 1>with whom they share this prototype. Most took the idea

0:04:50.240 --> 0:04:53.440
<v Speaker 1>to Jack Bogel, who was running Vanguard at the time.

0:04:53.560 --> 0:04:56.440
<v Speaker 1>Bogel says he gets a cold call from Nate Most.

0:04:56.880 --> 0:04:59.920
<v Speaker 1>And it's important to note here that Jack Bogel may

0:05:00.200 --> 0:05:03.760
<v Speaker 1>be the most influential investor of all time, even more

0:05:03.760 --> 0:05:08.320
<v Speaker 1>so than Warren Buffett. Bogel basically invented indexing and founded

0:05:08.320 --> 0:05:12.240
<v Speaker 1>the behemoth Vanguard, whose low cost mutual funds have helped

0:05:12.279 --> 0:05:15.279
<v Speaker 1>millions of Americans retire. So it's a big deal to

0:05:15.320 --> 0:05:18.080
<v Speaker 1>just cold column. And he has very clear thoughts about

0:05:18.080 --> 0:05:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street and investing, namely, watch the fees, diversify, focus

0:05:23.279 --> 0:05:26.600
<v Speaker 1>on the long term. But Bogel says Nate was different

0:05:26.600 --> 0:05:28.920
<v Speaker 1>than all the other cold colors he's had through the years.

0:05:29.040 --> 0:05:32.080
<v Speaker 1>But he was not a promoter type. You could warm

0:05:32.160 --> 0:05:34.200
<v Speaker 1>up to Nate Most and maybe he's he more of

0:05:34.279 --> 0:05:37.680
<v Speaker 1>my type of guy than some flashy US star salesman,

0:05:37.800 --> 0:05:40.440
<v Speaker 1>if you will. So, Most gives Bogol an outline of

0:05:40.480 --> 0:05:43.680
<v Speaker 1>his proposal. The proposal was that we would let him

0:05:43.800 --> 0:05:47.120
<v Speaker 1>use our s and P. Five hundred for his spire

0:05:47.800 --> 0:05:50.640
<v Speaker 1>as as I guess it was called. Man, anyone who

0:05:50.680 --> 0:05:54.040
<v Speaker 1>knows Jack Bogel knows that that's like, you know, I'm

0:05:54.080 --> 0:05:58.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna say this, that's borderline insulting. I mean, he's so

0:05:58.520 --> 0:06:00.600
<v Speaker 1>anti trading. He wants you to will win the fund

0:06:00.640 --> 0:06:04.000
<v Speaker 1>and like never touch it for twenty five years. And

0:06:04.040 --> 0:06:06.320
<v Speaker 1>he said he wanted to come down and talk to

0:06:06.320 --> 0:06:08.479
<v Speaker 1>me about and I said, fine. He seemed like a

0:06:08.560 --> 0:06:10.760
<v Speaker 1>nice person. And he came into my all of a

0:06:10.800 --> 0:06:14.000
<v Speaker 1>sudden the Monday morning, and he was not a nice person.

0:06:14.440 --> 0:06:16.839
<v Speaker 1>He was the nicest person I've ever met in my life.

0:06:17.240 --> 0:06:21.400
<v Speaker 1>And I said to however, Nathan, Mr mos Nate, they

0:06:21.440 --> 0:06:24.800
<v Speaker 1>proposing you sent me last week doesn't work, but has

0:06:24.880 --> 0:06:28.520
<v Speaker 1>these three flaws, and you're gonna have to get them

0:06:28.560 --> 0:06:31.039
<v Speaker 1>fixed before you can never do anything with it. The

0:06:31.080 --> 0:06:33.279
<v Speaker 1>way he told me the story later was he got

0:06:33.279 --> 0:06:36.479
<v Speaker 1>back on the train and fixed the three things and

0:06:36.600 --> 0:06:41.240
<v Speaker 1>got on the next train to stay stree Bois says

0:06:41.279 --> 0:06:44.800
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't remember what those three things were. Wasn't that

0:06:44.880 --> 0:06:47.200
<v Speaker 1>the big concern was you're gonna just rack up costs

0:06:47.200 --> 0:06:49.120
<v Speaker 1>for the linehold people if you'd let this thing trade

0:06:49.120 --> 0:06:52.120
<v Speaker 1>all the time. You know, Eric, I'm sorry, but A

0:06:52.400 --> 0:06:55.920
<v Speaker 1>just taking his toll. Hey. He remembers the meeting though,

0:06:56.200 --> 0:07:00.600
<v Speaker 1>but a nice meeting. We parted friends, and I like that.

0:07:01.320 --> 0:07:03.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, you can have different ideas with people in Jonathan,

0:07:05.480 --> 0:07:08.320
<v Speaker 1>what our ideas ideas or Diamond doesn't and friends are

0:07:08.360 --> 0:07:11.760
<v Speaker 1>much more important. So whether or not it was on

0:07:11.800 --> 0:07:14.680
<v Speaker 1>that train ride back from meeting with Bogel, Most goes

0:07:14.720 --> 0:07:17.920
<v Speaker 1>back to the drawing board, or more specifically, back to

0:07:17.960 --> 0:07:21.560
<v Speaker 1>his days of running the Pacific Commodities Exchange. And there

0:07:21.600 --> 0:07:25.720
<v Speaker 1>you had these warehouses that would store the commodities. Let's see,

0:07:25.720 --> 0:07:29.240
<v Speaker 1>you had like soybean oil, and you would take your

0:07:29.240 --> 0:07:31.800
<v Speaker 1>soybean oil in store it in the locker, and you

0:07:31.840 --> 0:07:34.800
<v Speaker 1>get a receipt, and the receipt then you could trade

0:07:34.960 --> 0:07:38.520
<v Speaker 1>with somebody without having to move merchandise. So Most thought, well,

0:07:38.840 --> 0:07:41.560
<v Speaker 1>what if we took that model of commodity warehouse receipts

0:07:41.760 --> 0:07:44.120
<v Speaker 1>and instead of the actual physical commodity, we just made

0:07:44.120 --> 0:07:54.280
<v Speaker 1>it in the sp So this concept of the receipt

0:07:54.360 --> 0:07:57.720
<v Speaker 1>trading back and forth, that trading does nothing to the

0:07:57.760 --> 0:08:00.800
<v Speaker 1>soybean oil sitting in the warehouse or in this case

0:08:01.000 --> 0:08:04.800
<v Speaker 1>the stocks. That is a way to keep the investors

0:08:05.240 --> 0:08:10.160
<v Speaker 1>from incurring costs from people who are trading. Most in

0:08:10.200 --> 0:08:13.360
<v Speaker 1>Bloom now have their idea. It's been vetted. Now they

0:08:13.360 --> 0:08:16.800
<v Speaker 1>have to name it, and they go with spider SMP

0:08:17.000 --> 0:08:21.880
<v Speaker 1>for the snp F and d R for depository receipts.

0:08:26.320 --> 0:08:29.440
<v Speaker 1>And to me, that is the heartbeat of the e

0:08:29.520 --> 0:08:32.040
<v Speaker 1>t F and that's what made it a very special product.

0:08:32.160 --> 0:08:34.360
<v Speaker 1>And you have to know that at this time Nate

0:08:34.400 --> 0:08:37.079
<v Speaker 1>Most and Steve Bloom aren't the only people thinking about

0:08:37.160 --> 0:08:39.640
<v Speaker 1>index is being able to be traded like that. There

0:08:39.640 --> 0:08:43.000
<v Speaker 1>were several other types of versions, but most of them

0:08:43.120 --> 0:08:46.040
<v Speaker 1>had a variety of issues. And just like any invention,

0:08:46.080 --> 0:08:47.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, Steve Jobs and Wozniak weren't the only two

0:08:47.960 --> 0:08:50.760
<v Speaker 1>guys in a garage. There were plenty of people in

0:08:50.840 --> 0:08:54.120
<v Speaker 1>Silicon Valley working on things like that. They just happened

0:08:54.160 --> 0:08:57.200
<v Speaker 1>to just get the right way to do it. And

0:08:57.240 --> 0:09:00.160
<v Speaker 1>in this case it was the creation redemption mac is.

0:09:00.360 --> 0:09:04.840
<v Speaker 1>I think that gave spy its edge. That creation redemption

0:09:04.880 --> 0:09:08.280
<v Speaker 1>mechanism is ultimately what they put into the SPY filing.

0:09:08.559 --> 0:09:12.040
<v Speaker 1>They followed it with the SEC and then they had

0:09:12.080 --> 0:09:18.560
<v Speaker 1>to wait. And this is where a superhero comes in.

0:09:19.080 --> 0:09:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Spider Woman. I got that nickname right around the time

0:09:23.200 --> 0:09:26.800
<v Speaker 1>we launched Spiders. You may remember her from episode one.

0:09:27.160 --> 0:09:31.439
<v Speaker 1>Her name is Kathleen Moriarty. My legal assistant, Debbie Ferraro,

0:09:32.240 --> 0:09:34.720
<v Speaker 1>gave me a present. It was a front cover of

0:09:34.720 --> 0:09:38.400
<v Speaker 1>a comic book with like the Hulk going after some

0:09:39.400 --> 0:09:42.040
<v Speaker 1>huge monster, and she doctored it all up and she

0:09:42.120 --> 0:09:44.679
<v Speaker 1>made the Hulk me, and she made the Monster of

0:09:44.679 --> 0:09:47.280
<v Speaker 1>the SEC, and she changed all the numbers to make

0:09:47.400 --> 0:09:50.920
<v Speaker 1>SEC things and you know, sort of tongue in cheek,

0:09:51.280 --> 0:09:53.720
<v Speaker 1>and then she wrote Spider Woman on the top of it,

0:09:53.800 --> 0:10:01.760
<v Speaker 1>and it's still in my office. Next time on Trillions,

0:10:02.280 --> 0:10:04.840
<v Speaker 1>we'll hear more from Spider Woman about what it was

0:10:04.880 --> 0:10:08.680
<v Speaker 1>like to actually design Spy. People were afraid that a

0:10:08.720 --> 0:10:11.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of arachnophobes would be turned off and not want

0:10:11.320 --> 0:10:13.600
<v Speaker 1>to buy the E t F, but we ultimately called

0:10:13.640 --> 0:10:16.400
<v Speaker 1>it Spider anyway. Oh and in case you are wondering

0:10:16.440 --> 0:10:18.760
<v Speaker 1>what Jack Bogo thinks of ETS, well, in E t

0:10:18.920 --> 0:10:21.599
<v Speaker 1>F it is just another form of index fun, a

0:10:21.760 --> 0:10:24.200
<v Speaker 1>sort of bastardized forum for the one of a better word.

0:10:31.920 --> 0:10:35.840
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to Trillions Presents until next time. You

0:10:35.840 --> 0:10:39.240
<v Speaker 1>can find us on the Bloomberg Terminal, Bloomberg dot com,

0:10:39.360 --> 0:10:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Apple podcast, and where else you listen to podcasts. Trillions

0:10:44.040 --> 0:10:48.480
<v Speaker 1>Presents is produced by Jordan Belle. Francesca Levy is the

0:10:48.520 --> 0:10:50.280
<v Speaker 1>head of Bloomberg Podcast