WEBVTT - MLB Futures Mid-Season Update (Ep. 92)

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:15.000
<v Speaker 1>It's time to place your bets. Let's talk to the pros.

0:00:15.800 --> 0:00:18.279
<v Speaker 1>Welcome in everybody to betting pros. It's me Joey p

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:21.320
<v Speaker 1>joe Pisapia, and we got a great show for you today.

0:00:21.440 --> 0:00:25.360
<v Speaker 1>As always, today we are officially halfway through the Major

0:00:25.400 --> 0:00:28.840
<v Speaker 1>League Baseball season, and that means it's time to take

0:00:28.880 --> 0:00:31.080
<v Speaker 1>a look at where we stand with some of our

0:00:31.280 --> 0:00:36.080
<v Speaker 1>preseason predictions, some of our preseason awards, and whether or

0:00:36.120 --> 0:00:38.519
<v Speaker 1>not we still feel confident in some of those wagers,

0:00:38.560 --> 0:00:40.400
<v Speaker 1>and maybe we want to take our chips and put

0:00:40.440 --> 0:00:42.879
<v Speaker 1>them some other places. And of course, if you recall

0:00:43.080 --> 0:00:46.320
<v Speaker 1>when we did this before the season started, my illustrious partner,

0:00:46.400 --> 0:00:49.640
<v Speaker 1>the EIC of Fantasy Pros, Dan Harris, my co host

0:00:49.840 --> 0:00:52.839
<v Speaker 1>from leading off on Fantasy Pros, we sat down, we

0:00:52.880 --> 0:00:55.680
<v Speaker 1>gave you the goods and overall things went pretty well.

0:00:55.720 --> 0:00:58.600
<v Speaker 1>But we are sticklers for rules and we want to

0:00:58.640 --> 0:01:01.600
<v Speaker 1>make sure that we're holding ourselves accountable. So Dan Harris,

0:01:01.600 --> 0:01:04.399
<v Speaker 1>I hope you have your accountability hat on today because

0:01:04.440 --> 0:01:06.759
<v Speaker 1>we're talking Major League Baseball halfway through the year.

0:01:07.200 --> 0:01:09.120
<v Speaker 2>All I know is I never once said that a

0:01:09.200 --> 0:01:12.400
<v Speaker 2>bet on Chohatani to win the MVP was wasting money.

0:01:12.600 --> 0:01:14.560
<v Speaker 2>Never said it. I don't know who would have said that.

0:01:14.560 --> 0:01:17.560
<v Speaker 2>That's a ridiculous thing to have said. So don't worry.

0:01:17.959 --> 0:01:19.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm totally ready to be accountable for things that I

0:01:19.800 --> 0:01:21.600
<v Speaker 2>actually said, not that which I never said.

0:01:22.280 --> 0:01:23.720
<v Speaker 1>Now I kind of want to go back. Did you

0:01:23.840 --> 0:01:27.160
<v Speaker 1>really say that? No, I didn't think it quite said that.

0:01:27.200 --> 0:01:30.240
<v Speaker 2>I completely poo pooed the idea that he could win.

0:01:30.480 --> 0:01:32.640
<v Speaker 2>I did it on our Fans Bros. Livestream or did

0:01:32.640 --> 0:01:35.560
<v Speaker 2>it here on our Betting Pros podcast. I was like,

0:01:35.600 --> 0:01:37.760
<v Speaker 2>it was fine to sprinkle a little something, but I

0:01:37.800 --> 0:01:40.520
<v Speaker 2>did not view it as a realistic possibility. And now

0:01:40.640 --> 0:01:44.080
<v Speaker 2>absolute injury, it's hard to see it not happening. So, yeah,

0:01:44.080 --> 0:01:46.520
<v Speaker 2>there are misses, but there are plenty of hits as well.

0:01:46.520 --> 0:01:47.880
<v Speaker 2>So let's get into it all.

0:01:48.000 --> 0:01:50.320
<v Speaker 1>Right here we go, So let's start with the big ones.

0:01:50.360 --> 0:01:53.320
<v Speaker 1>Let's start with MVP. In fact, let's start with the

0:01:53.400 --> 0:01:55.840
<v Speaker 1>American League because right now, if you go to Bettingpros

0:01:55.840 --> 0:01:58.000
<v Speaker 1>dot com, you can see the consensus of everything that

0:01:58.040 --> 0:02:00.440
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about, and maybe, just maybe, in some of

0:02:00.480 --> 0:02:03.040
<v Speaker 1>these betting houses you can find some odds that are

0:02:03.040 --> 0:02:05.440
<v Speaker 1>a little bit better than even because that's what you

0:02:05.520 --> 0:02:07.480
<v Speaker 1>got right now? For Showey Otani, who I think start

0:02:07.520 --> 0:02:09.760
<v Speaker 1>out the year somewhere in the twenty five to one

0:02:09.880 --> 0:02:12.200
<v Speaker 1>range and then it crept to ten and then started

0:02:12.240 --> 0:02:14.000
<v Speaker 1>to get real interesting in the eight and a half, seven,

0:02:14.080 --> 0:02:16.440
<v Speaker 1>six and a half. Now it is dead even for

0:02:16.520 --> 0:02:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Otani and vlad Guerrero Junior. Even Vlad Guerrero Junior has

0:02:20.040 --> 0:02:22.160
<v Speaker 1>come out and said, I don't even know how you

0:02:22.160 --> 0:02:24.960
<v Speaker 1>can compare me to what that guy's doing. JJ Watt

0:02:25.000 --> 0:02:27.519
<v Speaker 1>takes to Twitter. He doesn't even play baseball and he's

0:02:27.560 --> 0:02:30.040
<v Speaker 1>talking about this. Are you guys crazy or are you drunk?

0:02:30.040 --> 0:02:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Have you seen what this guy is doing? The question

0:02:32.200 --> 0:02:34.880
<v Speaker 1>is would you get involved in the even bet and

0:02:34.919 --> 0:02:37.280
<v Speaker 1>there's somebody even else out there worth putting money on.

0:02:37.600 --> 0:02:40.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't think there is, even barring injury, even with

0:02:40.480 --> 0:02:43.160
<v Speaker 1>missing time. I don't even know if you could put

0:02:43.160 --> 0:02:45.760
<v Speaker 1>anyone's stats against what Atani's doing because he has a

0:02:45.800 --> 0:02:48.560
<v Speaker 1>category that no other hitter does, and they're all the

0:02:48.600 --> 0:02:51.919
<v Speaker 1>pitching categories and that's the difference. So even money right

0:02:51.960 --> 0:02:54.840
<v Speaker 1>now not a lot of value. But is it worth

0:02:54.840 --> 0:02:57.880
<v Speaker 1>the investment because of the difference between these two entities?

0:02:59.400 --> 0:03:01.600
<v Speaker 2>I guess to answer the second part. First, no, there

0:03:01.680 --> 0:03:03.880
<v Speaker 2>is nobody else who I can see factoring into this race.

0:03:03.960 --> 0:03:05.800
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it would take both of these guys essentially

0:03:05.840 --> 0:03:09.160
<v Speaker 2>getting injured for the rest of the season to really

0:03:09.320 --> 0:03:11.560
<v Speaker 2>make it happen. I mean, who who's the third favorite

0:03:11.560 --> 0:03:15.160
<v Speaker 2>here is? It's Xander Bogart's He's having a great season

0:03:15.200 --> 0:03:17.040
<v Speaker 2>and I've got him at plus twenty eight hundred and

0:03:17.040 --> 0:03:20.400
<v Speaker 2>our betting pros consensus rankings. Sure, that's fine, but there's

0:03:20.520 --> 0:03:22.800
<v Speaker 2>just no chance. I mean, and again, the Red Sox

0:03:22.840 --> 0:03:26.200
<v Speaker 2>are not succeeding because of Xander Bogarts. J D. Martinez

0:03:26.240 --> 0:03:30.919
<v Speaker 2>is having a fabulous bounced back season. Rafel Devers also exceptional.

0:03:31.200 --> 0:03:34.120
<v Speaker 2>You know, even Hunter renfro Is where is betting Alex Berdugo.

0:03:34.200 --> 0:03:36.880
<v Speaker 2>It's a team effort with that, as opposed to the Angels,

0:03:36.920 --> 0:03:39.400
<v Speaker 2>where you've got Otani who is doing historic stuff, and

0:03:39.400 --> 0:03:42.000
<v Speaker 2>the Blue Jays, which again you've got Bobaschett. But Vladdie

0:03:42.040 --> 0:03:46.360
<v Speaker 2>is playing out of his absolute mind. So look for me. Fine,

0:03:46.440 --> 0:03:48.520
<v Speaker 2>if I think Otani is gonna win it regardless of

0:03:48.520 --> 0:03:50.640
<v Speaker 2>where the Angels finished, just because of the historic nature

0:03:50.680 --> 0:03:52.480
<v Speaker 2>of what he's doing. The only thing that I would

0:03:52.560 --> 0:03:54.600
<v Speaker 2>really do at this point, if I were going to

0:03:54.600 --> 0:03:57.320
<v Speaker 2>get involved, is look for the different books. You know,

0:03:57.320 --> 0:03:59.640
<v Speaker 2>again at betting Pros we show the odds of different books.

0:03:59.720 --> 0:04:02.000
<v Speaker 2>You want to go with plus money at Chotani at

0:04:02.000 --> 0:04:04.160
<v Speaker 2>plus one oh five on DraftKings. If you could then

0:04:04.200 --> 0:04:06.920
<v Speaker 2>also sprinkle a little bit on the plus one ten

0:04:07.120 --> 0:04:09.880
<v Speaker 2>on Vladdie at FanDuel, go ahead and do that so

0:04:09.920 --> 0:04:12.800
<v Speaker 2>you can probably almost certainly lack in a very minor profit.

0:04:12.840 --> 0:04:14.880
<v Speaker 2>Other than that, just stay away. One of these two

0:04:14.880 --> 0:04:16.320
<v Speaker 2>guys are gonna win it, and I don't really think

0:04:16.360 --> 0:04:17.920
<v Speaker 2>it's worth it at this point. What did you get

0:04:17.920 --> 0:04:19.320
<v Speaker 2>them at earlier in the season.

0:04:19.880 --> 0:04:24.800
<v Speaker 1>I locked him in in season a month and a

0:04:24.839 --> 0:04:28.320
<v Speaker 1>half into the season, I locked in Otani at six fifty. Okay,

0:04:28.360 --> 0:04:30.320
<v Speaker 1>that's that's where I got Autani because I felt like,

0:04:30.760 --> 0:04:33.080
<v Speaker 1>this is the last time it's ever gonna be this

0:04:33.240 --> 0:04:35.760
<v Speaker 1>high a number. Yeah, it's just gonna be. And I waited,

0:04:35.800 --> 0:04:37.719
<v Speaker 1>and I was really tempted at I think it was

0:04:37.880 --> 0:04:39.920
<v Speaker 1>nine and a half where I started to go, oh,

0:04:39.960 --> 0:04:41.360
<v Speaker 1>I really want to do this. But I had a

0:04:41.360 --> 0:04:43.159
<v Speaker 1>little bit of discipline and it cost me some money.

0:04:43.520 --> 0:04:45.840
<v Speaker 1>But you know what, I didn't wait too long where

0:04:45.839 --> 0:04:47.920
<v Speaker 1>it costs me all the money potentially, I'm going to

0:04:47.960 --> 0:04:51.719
<v Speaker 1>disagree respectfully with Dan. Don't sprinkle any lad sprinkle it

0:04:51.760 --> 0:04:54.480
<v Speaker 1>all o time. This is a special, especially this week

0:04:54.880 --> 0:04:57.039
<v Speaker 1>in front of the New York media doing what he's doing.

0:04:57.360 --> 0:04:59.840
<v Speaker 1>It's a it's a media award, don't forget that. And

0:05:00.120 --> 0:05:03.120
<v Speaker 1>media right now is loving the sho Heiyo Tani show.

0:05:03.320 --> 0:05:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about the National League a little bit more

0:05:05.200 --> 0:05:08.479
<v Speaker 1>open here the consensus betting line here, Jacob deGrom the

0:05:08.600 --> 0:05:12.839
<v Speaker 1>pitcher still plus one twenty five. You have Fernando Tattis

0:05:12.960 --> 0:05:15.279
<v Speaker 1>Junior plus one seventy five. Then Akunya has fallen down

0:05:15.279 --> 0:05:18.240
<v Speaker 1>to plus four hundred. He originally was the leader about

0:05:18.279 --> 0:05:20.280
<v Speaker 1>a month ago when last time we checked in on this,

0:05:20.560 --> 0:05:22.320
<v Speaker 1>and then he got the Jesse Winkers and some other

0:05:22.320 --> 0:05:24.840
<v Speaker 1>guys like Cassie Allos at thirty and above. It's really

0:05:24.920 --> 0:05:27.040
<v Speaker 1>probably a three person race. But I will say this,

0:05:27.800 --> 0:05:29.359
<v Speaker 1>I think this is the time to get involved in

0:05:29.360 --> 0:05:32.279
<v Speaker 1>Fernando Tattis Junior. He's an everyday player. The Padres have

0:05:32.279 --> 0:05:35.320
<v Speaker 1>played very good baseball. The narrative is there with the injury,

0:05:35.640 --> 0:05:37.800
<v Speaker 1>and as much as personally I love Degram and what

0:05:37.839 --> 0:05:39.880
<v Speaker 1>he's doing, and it's spectacular. You can make the case

0:05:39.920 --> 0:05:42.839
<v Speaker 1>for him. He's not an everyday player, and in a

0:05:42.920 --> 0:05:45.680
<v Speaker 1>year where you have somebody performing as well as Tatis is,

0:05:46.240 --> 0:05:48.120
<v Speaker 1>I think you have to think about that. But maybe

0:05:48.160 --> 0:05:50.800
<v Speaker 1>you feel differently. Is de Grom transcendent enough for you

0:05:51.360 --> 0:05:54.480
<v Speaker 1>in terms of a pitching season where even if Tatis

0:05:54.520 --> 0:05:57.160
<v Speaker 1>hits forty home runs and seals twenty five bases, you're

0:05:57.200 --> 0:05:58.960
<v Speaker 1>still gonna give it to de Grom because he's been

0:05:58.960 --> 0:05:59.360
<v Speaker 1>that good.

0:05:59.680 --> 0:06:02.039
<v Speaker 2>I think think the issue with MVP, as you mentioned,

0:06:02.160 --> 0:06:04.680
<v Speaker 2>is it's a media award, right, we can't quantify it.

0:06:04.680 --> 0:06:06.440
<v Speaker 2>It's not an over under, right, we can't say this

0:06:06.480 --> 0:06:09.240
<v Speaker 2>is what we think. It's what's going to happen. If

0:06:09.279 --> 0:06:13.559
<v Speaker 2>Tatis stays healthy and the Padres win that division, then yeah,

0:06:13.600 --> 0:06:16.680
<v Speaker 2>he's got a very decent shot at it. But the

0:06:16.720 --> 0:06:19.440
<v Speaker 2>Mets don't score runs, and I think they're what seven

0:06:19.440 --> 0:06:21.360
<v Speaker 2>games over five hundred right now, and I think they're

0:06:21.360 --> 0:06:23.920
<v Speaker 2>ten and three in the Grom starts like he is

0:06:24.080 --> 0:06:25.839
<v Speaker 2>the Mets right now, and what he is doing is

0:06:25.880 --> 0:06:29.520
<v Speaker 2>so historic, But with those odds, it's just not worth

0:06:29.560 --> 0:06:31.000
<v Speaker 2>it for me to sprinkle on d Grom at this

0:06:31.040 --> 0:06:33.080
<v Speaker 2>point because it's a pitcher and it's rare for him

0:06:33.120 --> 0:06:35.520
<v Speaker 2>to win. He's already battling the injuries and everything like that.

0:06:35.520 --> 0:06:38.480
<v Speaker 2>Plus one twenty five, you've got to basically say greater

0:06:38.640 --> 0:06:41.360
<v Speaker 2>than a forty four percent chance for him to win

0:06:41.400 --> 0:06:43.720
<v Speaker 2>the National League MVP. I don't really feel that way,

0:06:43.880 --> 0:06:46.040
<v Speaker 2>but again, you know from our time at Fantasy Pros

0:06:46.080 --> 0:06:48.000
<v Speaker 2>when we talk about it, I am still too worried

0:06:48.000 --> 0:06:51.200
<v Speaker 2>about Fernando Tattis Junior's injuries. He's also got big mountains

0:06:51.200 --> 0:06:52.919
<v Speaker 2>to climb for them to win that division with the

0:06:52.960 --> 0:06:55.440
<v Speaker 2>Dodgers and the Giants. So for me, this is just

0:06:55.480 --> 0:06:58.240
<v Speaker 2>not something that's worth even sprinkling on because I just

0:06:58.240 --> 0:07:01.520
<v Speaker 2>don't feel comfortable with either of these guys at their odds.

0:07:01.680 --> 0:07:05.240
<v Speaker 1>And they both have injury risks attached to them as well. Now,

0:07:05.279 --> 0:07:07.040
<v Speaker 1>in terms of Jacob de Grom, when it comes to

0:07:07.080 --> 0:07:09.400
<v Speaker 1>cy Young, a little bit of a different story. The

0:07:09.520 --> 0:07:13.520
<v Speaker 1>number right here consensus is minus five sixty. So yeah,

0:07:13.560 --> 0:07:16.520
<v Speaker 1>no thanks, nobody's gonna do that. The question is it

0:07:16.560 --> 0:07:19.240
<v Speaker 1>worth throwing money anywhere else because of the injury risk

0:07:19.280 --> 0:07:22.240
<v Speaker 1>of de Gram? If de Gram, god forbid, got shut

0:07:22.280 --> 0:07:25.120
<v Speaker 1>down in two weeks for another injury or some other

0:07:25.240 --> 0:07:27.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of issue, or ended up only let's say, making

0:07:27.920 --> 0:07:30.560
<v Speaker 1>twenty five starts this year when all a said and done,

0:07:30.760 --> 0:07:32.880
<v Speaker 1>that certainly could impact him. You and I have talked

0:07:32.920 --> 0:07:35.200
<v Speaker 1>on leading off quite a bit about Brandon Woodruff's stats

0:07:35.560 --> 0:07:39.240
<v Speaker 1>off the charts, the Milwaukee Brewers playing very good baseball.

0:07:39.320 --> 0:07:42.160
<v Speaker 1>Corbyn Burns is at plus sixteen hundred, but Brandon Woodriff

0:07:42.200 --> 0:07:45.160
<v Speaker 1>is plus eight hundred. Then you have you Darborship plus eighteen.

0:07:45.600 --> 0:07:47.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, is an eight to one A small chip

0:07:47.920 --> 0:07:51.000
<v Speaker 1>or two on Brandon Woodruff is not terrible because the

0:07:51.120 --> 0:07:55.840
<v Speaker 1>stats are are pretty freaking spectacular. I mean, that's all

0:07:55.880 --> 0:07:58.000
<v Speaker 1>I can tell you. They just are. They're off the

0:07:58.120 --> 0:08:00.680
<v Speaker 1>charts good. But the reason why nobody's talking him is

0:08:00.720 --> 0:08:03.040
<v Speaker 1>because de Grom is doing something. It goes like a cyborg.

0:08:03.360 --> 0:08:06.080
<v Speaker 1>The trouble is the amount of starts. If Woodroff ends

0:08:06.120 --> 0:08:08.920
<v Speaker 1>up with thirty two starts and Jacob deGrom ends up

0:08:08.920 --> 0:08:11.120
<v Speaker 1>at twenty five at the end of the day, that

0:08:11.200 --> 0:08:13.960
<v Speaker 1>might weigh very heavily on the thoughts of voters, But

0:08:14.720 --> 0:08:17.480
<v Speaker 1>obviously de Grom's still the overwhelming favorite. Can you make

0:08:17.520 --> 0:08:20.160
<v Speaker 1>a case for throwing any chips, whatsoever, anywhere else.

0:08:20.640 --> 0:08:23.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, without question, you can. I mean, look, if da

0:08:23.200 --> 0:08:26.960
<v Speaker 2>Gram stays healthy absent in historic collapse, and we have

0:08:27.040 --> 0:08:28.840
<v Speaker 2>seen those with the mets of course in the past,

0:08:28.880 --> 0:08:32.040
<v Speaker 2>but absent and historic collapse, the award is his. What

0:08:32.120 --> 0:08:35.240
<v Speaker 2>he's doing right now is not human. So if he

0:08:35.280 --> 0:08:38.520
<v Speaker 2>stays healthy, that's good. We've seen him already battling like

0:08:38.600 --> 0:08:41.720
<v Speaker 2>three or four injuries this year, and with pitching there's

0:08:41.760 --> 0:08:43.480
<v Speaker 2>always the chance of an injury, as we have seen

0:08:43.480 --> 0:08:45.880
<v Speaker 2>with others. And you've mentioned Woodroff. Woodroff is great and

0:08:45.920 --> 0:08:48.120
<v Speaker 2>there is value in him, I think at plus eight hundred.

0:08:48.200 --> 0:08:50.280
<v Speaker 2>But I guess something that I'm confused about, Joe, and

0:08:50.280 --> 0:08:52.080
<v Speaker 2>maybe you can explain it to me, is why is

0:08:52.080 --> 0:08:54.920
<v Speaker 2>Woodroff at plus eight hundred when Kevin Gosman is at

0:08:54.960 --> 0:08:57.560
<v Speaker 2>plus two thousand and Zach Wheeler is at plus twenty

0:08:57.640 --> 0:09:00.200
<v Speaker 2>five hundred. You look at their stats lined up, they're

0:09:00.200 --> 0:09:02.840
<v Speaker 2>all pretty similar. Wheeler and Gozman put up a ton

0:09:02.880 --> 0:09:04.840
<v Speaker 2>of innings as well, which you know factors into the

0:09:04.880 --> 0:09:07.719
<v Speaker 2>mind of voters because it's going to affect their war.

0:09:07.760 --> 0:09:09.920
<v Speaker 2>It's gonna affect how valuable they are to their team.

0:09:10.000 --> 0:09:13.720
<v Speaker 2>So for me, I'm definitely sprinking on Gosman and Wheeler

0:09:13.800 --> 0:09:15.560
<v Speaker 2>at the very least, given that their odds are so

0:09:15.640 --> 0:09:18.040
<v Speaker 2>far out of whack with Woodroff. Again, this is not

0:09:18.120 --> 0:09:21.199
<v Speaker 2>something where a team really factors into it necessarily. Remember,

0:09:21.280 --> 0:09:24.320
<v Speaker 2>voters will throw out wins and losses as they absolutely should.

0:09:24.320 --> 0:09:27.400
<v Speaker 2>This is an individual award, So whether the Brewers make

0:09:27.440 --> 0:09:30.360
<v Speaker 2>the playoffs, that can factor into other things. But I

0:09:30.400 --> 0:09:32.360
<v Speaker 2>don't think with Cy Young, so do you have any

0:09:32.640 --> 0:09:35.280
<v Speaker 2>understanding of why Kevin Gosman and Zac Wheeler is their

0:09:35.280 --> 0:09:37.840
<v Speaker 2>odds are so much higher than they've.

0:09:37.679 --> 0:09:41.360
<v Speaker 1>Seen good runs from Wheeler before. But the you know,

0:09:41.640 --> 0:09:43.720
<v Speaker 1>this is obviously the best run and the best extended

0:09:43.800 --> 0:09:45.760
<v Speaker 1>run he's had. I think that's baked into the number

0:09:45.840 --> 0:09:47.800
<v Speaker 1>right now. I think if he continues to do this

0:09:47.840 --> 0:09:51.040
<v Speaker 1>for another six weeks, that number will change dramatically. It'll

0:09:51.040 --> 0:09:54.160
<v Speaker 1>get closer to six or seven to one, something like that.

0:09:54.200 --> 0:09:56.160
<v Speaker 1>I think it could become that dramatic if he has

0:09:56.160 --> 0:09:58.680
<v Speaker 1>that kind of a run. But Woodroff is pitching for

0:09:58.720 --> 0:10:02.440
<v Speaker 1>a first place team, and pitching is carrying them as

0:10:02.559 --> 0:10:05.600
<v Speaker 1>much as Jacob de Gram is carrying the Mets. Brandon Woodroff,

0:10:05.640 --> 0:10:09.880
<v Speaker 1>Freddie Peralta and Corbyn Burns are carrying this absolutely just

0:10:09.920 --> 0:10:12.839
<v Speaker 1>abysmal offense of the Milwaukee Brewers right now. So I

0:10:12.880 --> 0:10:14.680
<v Speaker 1>think that's what's happening, and I think people are starting

0:10:14.679 --> 0:10:17.000
<v Speaker 1>to realize too, this is not one year wonder of

0:10:17.000 --> 0:10:20.240
<v Speaker 1>Brandon Woodriff, not two years. We're in year three of him,

0:10:20.600 --> 0:10:22.440
<v Speaker 1>and last year being the shortened season, he didn't get

0:10:22.520 --> 0:10:24.520
<v Speaker 1>enough credit how good he was. And I think people

0:10:24.559 --> 0:10:26.160
<v Speaker 1>are starting to realize this guy's an a lead pitcher

0:10:26.160 --> 0:10:27.920
<v Speaker 1>in the National League, and his number stack up there

0:10:27.920 --> 0:10:30.400
<v Speaker 1>with the elites, including guys like Garret Cole in the

0:10:30.400 --> 0:10:33.520
<v Speaker 1>American League who is at minus one sixty seven. But

0:10:33.640 --> 0:10:35.960
<v Speaker 1>let me tell you right now, these last few starts

0:10:36.000 --> 0:10:37.760
<v Speaker 1>has not been good. This is a tough number. I

0:10:37.800 --> 0:10:40.719
<v Speaker 1>am not going minus money on him whatsoever. The other

0:10:40.760 --> 0:10:43.520
<v Speaker 1>guys around there, Carlos Rodanna plus three hundred, who was

0:10:43.920 --> 0:10:45.679
<v Speaker 1>you know going in a few weeks ago we talked

0:10:45.720 --> 0:10:47.520
<v Speaker 1>about a lot. He seems like you know him and

0:10:47.559 --> 0:10:50.360
<v Speaker 1>Trey Mancini is they're gonna battle it out for comeback

0:10:50.360 --> 0:10:53.079
<v Speaker 1>Player of the Year. But Carlos Rodonna's real shot at

0:10:53.080 --> 0:10:55.199
<v Speaker 1>cy young at this point, Lance Lynn at plus six

0:10:55.320 --> 0:10:58.000
<v Speaker 1>fifty Shane Bieber. With the injury, He's fallen all the

0:10:58.040 --> 0:11:00.480
<v Speaker 1>way from he was like plus two hundred a few

0:11:00.520 --> 0:11:03.040
<v Speaker 1>weeks ago before the injury to now plus fifteen hundred.

0:11:03.520 --> 0:11:06.840
<v Speaker 1>This is kind of wide open here, Dan, and I'll

0:11:06.840 --> 0:11:09.440
<v Speaker 1>tell you what. I don't feel comfortable putting money on

0:11:09.640 --> 0:11:13.000
<v Speaker 1>any of these guys. Rodin's been the best story, but

0:11:13.280 --> 0:11:16.280
<v Speaker 1>I find it really difficult to put minus one sixty

0:11:16.320 --> 0:11:18.760
<v Speaker 1>seven money on Garrett Cole, and I don't like any

0:11:18.800 --> 0:11:22.559
<v Speaker 1>of these other guys being transcendent, dominating pitchers. I'm gonna

0:11:22.559 --> 0:11:26.199
<v Speaker 1>throw out something fun for you. I think there's a

0:11:26.320 --> 0:11:29.240
<v Speaker 1>chance if sho Heyo Tani keeps doing what he's doing,

0:11:29.880 --> 0:11:32.679
<v Speaker 1>he might start to get into this conversation. And let's

0:11:32.720 --> 0:11:36.640
<v Speaker 1>not pretend like he can't, because the strikeout numbers are there,

0:11:36.760 --> 0:11:40.160
<v Speaker 1>the era is there. Every start he has, he's getting better.

0:11:40.640 --> 0:11:43.520
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna get himself into this conversation by the time

0:11:43.559 --> 0:11:45.600
<v Speaker 1>we turn the page to August. I do believe that.

0:11:46.040 --> 0:11:48.040
<v Speaker 2>All right, Well, we'll see whether or not the innings

0:11:48.040 --> 0:11:50.120
<v Speaker 2>are there. My big thing with him is that I

0:11:50.440 --> 0:11:52.360
<v Speaker 2>don't expect the Angels to compete, and I think they'll

0:11:52.360 --> 0:11:54.680
<v Speaker 2>want to protect him. But other than Otani, who I

0:11:54.720 --> 0:11:56.720
<v Speaker 2>know is your boy, and you know you're in on it,

0:11:56.760 --> 0:11:58.560
<v Speaker 2>and you've got the Spike store open already.

0:11:58.640 --> 0:11:58.839
<v Speaker 1>I do.

0:11:59.440 --> 0:12:02.120
<v Speaker 2>I know. I love it look and I'm not gonna

0:12:02.120 --> 0:12:04.320
<v Speaker 2>take it away from him. He's having a you know,

0:12:04.440 --> 0:12:07.000
<v Speaker 2>miraculous season. But I agree with you completely on Cole.

0:12:07.240 --> 0:12:10.000
<v Speaker 2>You and I again, because we host the Fantasy Pros show.

0:12:10.040 --> 0:12:13.160
<v Speaker 2>We talk about baseball every single day, and there is

0:12:13.200 --> 0:12:16.160
<v Speaker 2>a noticeable difference in what Garrett Cole looks like now

0:12:16.280 --> 0:12:19.400
<v Speaker 2>versus what he looked like before they started cracking down

0:12:19.400 --> 0:12:22.080
<v Speaker 2>on the sticky stuff. So it basically, you know, minus

0:12:22.200 --> 0:12:23.720
<v Speaker 2>the numbers are all over the place, by the way,

0:12:23.760 --> 0:12:25.840
<v Speaker 2>because that is moving towards minus one ninety. There's just

0:12:25.840 --> 0:12:27.760
<v Speaker 2>no way I'm gonna sprinkle on it. I don't mind

0:12:27.840 --> 0:12:29.720
<v Speaker 2>ro Donald, though those numbers are kind of short. Plus

0:12:29.720 --> 0:12:32.320
<v Speaker 2>three hundred is not really something where for a guy

0:12:32.360 --> 0:12:34.720
<v Speaker 2>who has never stayed healthy. If he stays healthy, I

0:12:34.720 --> 0:12:38.040
<v Speaker 2>think he would be my favorite. I don't mind lanceln either,

0:12:38.040 --> 0:12:40.200
<v Speaker 2>but I'm gonna throw out one other name to Joe,

0:12:40.200 --> 0:12:43.760
<v Speaker 2>who's odds are pretty high without looking who's the American

0:12:43.840 --> 0:12:47.680
<v Speaker 2>League leader in eer among qualified pitchers? Don't look any idea.

0:12:47.800 --> 0:12:50.720
<v Speaker 1>No, I'm not looking. I am not looking. That's a

0:12:50.800 --> 0:12:53.920
<v Speaker 1>really good question, thank you. I don't know. I don't

0:12:53.960 --> 0:12:54.920
<v Speaker 1>have an answer for that one.

0:12:55.400 --> 0:12:59.400
<v Speaker 2>The answer, the answer is Kyle Gibson. Kyle Gibson.

0:12:59.640 --> 0:13:02.160
<v Speaker 1>Who's a guy that your favorite guy are a mask

0:13:02.280 --> 0:13:02.880
<v Speaker 1>favorite guy.

0:13:03.040 --> 0:13:06.920
<v Speaker 2>Now, look, he does not have the strikeouts, okay, so

0:13:06.960 --> 0:13:10.599
<v Speaker 2>those are pretty important obviously, but he has been absolutely

0:13:10.640 --> 0:13:13.440
<v Speaker 2>exceptional this entire year. There's been very little. I mean,

0:13:13.440 --> 0:13:15.200
<v Speaker 2>his fit and his expit are in the low threes.

0:13:15.520 --> 0:13:18.400
<v Speaker 2>That's fine. He doesn't have the war necessarily, okay, fine,

0:13:18.559 --> 0:13:21.040
<v Speaker 2>but if he gets traded Joe, especially to a contender

0:13:21.080 --> 0:13:23.280
<v Speaker 2>in the American League. But even if he stays, he

0:13:23.440 --> 0:13:26.960
<v Speaker 2>is having an awesome season. That's just completely under the radar.

0:13:27.120 --> 0:13:30.079
<v Speaker 2>And his odds are plus five thousand. So when you're

0:13:30.120 --> 0:13:33.000
<v Speaker 2>talking about that, you you know, with those odds, all

0:13:33.000 --> 0:13:34.600
<v Speaker 2>you have to do is view it as something that's

0:13:34.640 --> 0:13:37.720
<v Speaker 2>even remotely plausible and it's worth the investment. So to

0:13:37.760 --> 0:13:40.679
<v Speaker 2>the extent I'm gonna sprinkle in on this, which I'm

0:13:40.720 --> 0:13:43.240
<v Speaker 2>probably not because it's silly at this point, but I

0:13:43.280 --> 0:13:45.400
<v Speaker 2>probably will just do it on Gibson, and other than

0:13:45.440 --> 0:13:47.439
<v Speaker 2>that ignore it because the odds on Rodin and even

0:13:47.520 --> 0:13:49.400
<v Speaker 2>lance Lynn, who would be my next favorite, aren't long

0:13:49.520 --> 0:13:50.280
<v Speaker 2>enough for me to take it.

0:13:50.480 --> 0:13:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think the Rodin ones are good right now

0:13:53.600 --> 0:13:55.960
<v Speaker 1>if he could. Here's the thing. Thirteen starts for Rodin.

0:13:56.160 --> 0:13:58.800
<v Speaker 1>He's got one hundred and thirteen strikeouts in just seventy

0:13:58.800 --> 0:14:03.160
<v Speaker 1>eight and things twenty four. The FIP is a two

0:14:03.240 --> 0:14:05.720
<v Speaker 1>four seven, the eras at two oh six. The whip

0:14:05.760 --> 0:14:08.720
<v Speaker 1>is point nine zero. It's not a flash in the pan.

0:14:08.800 --> 0:14:11.800
<v Speaker 1>It's the question is what does he do over the

0:14:11.840 --> 0:14:15.040
<v Speaker 1>final seventy plus innings of this season? And then you know,

0:14:15.040 --> 0:14:17.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go back to Otani and his eleven starts

0:14:17.240 --> 0:14:19.760
<v Speaker 1>so far, he's got a two five eight ERA. He's

0:14:19.800 --> 0:14:22.200
<v Speaker 1>got eighty two strikeouts and fifty nine innings and a

0:14:22.200 --> 0:14:25.680
<v Speaker 1>one point one to eight whip. Don't scoff a couple

0:14:25.760 --> 0:14:28.400
<v Speaker 1>more starts that are really good, that are six innings long.

0:14:28.680 --> 0:14:31.120
<v Speaker 1>All of a sudden, these stats are gonna get eerily similar.

0:14:31.560 --> 0:14:34.000
<v Speaker 1>And I'm telling you right now, the narrative is gonna

0:14:34.000 --> 0:14:36.160
<v Speaker 1>begin to build. And this is a narrative Award. And

0:14:36.200 --> 0:14:38.200
<v Speaker 1>I love stories, and let's tell the stories of the

0:14:38.240 --> 0:14:40.720
<v Speaker 1>young kids coming up too, because in the American League,

0:14:40.880 --> 0:14:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Jared Kellnick came and went, and Randy rose Arena has

0:14:44.520 --> 0:14:47.600
<v Speaker 1>gone stone cold. He's at plus three point fifty. Jared

0:14:47.640 --> 0:14:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Kellernick at ten to one. Wander Franco did finally make

0:14:50.920 --> 0:14:53.320
<v Speaker 1>his debut. He is at ten to one right now.

0:14:53.360 --> 0:14:55.680
<v Speaker 1>But I want to talk about somebody else who's at

0:14:55.720 --> 0:14:58.960
<v Speaker 1>plus twelve hundred, And you know it's not Urman Mercedes,

0:14:58.960 --> 0:15:02.280
<v Speaker 1>It's not Adley Rudh. It is Ryan Mountcastle now, who

0:15:02.360 --> 0:15:05.440
<v Speaker 1>is having himself a month. Now, here's the problem. He's

0:15:05.480 --> 0:15:08.080
<v Speaker 1>having a great month. Can he keep any sort of

0:15:08.120 --> 0:15:11.280
<v Speaker 1>pace to what he's doing in that great hitters ballpark,

0:15:11.880 --> 0:15:14.840
<v Speaker 1>a lineup that's actually much better than people realize at times.

0:15:15.200 --> 0:15:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Do you think Mouldcastle right now is kind of the

0:15:17.240 --> 0:15:19.280
<v Speaker 1>smart money for American League Rookie of the Year if

0:15:19.320 --> 0:15:20.400
<v Speaker 1>you want to take a shot on it.

0:15:21.000 --> 0:15:22.800
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I don't know if I would call it

0:15:22.840 --> 0:15:24.880
<v Speaker 2>the smart money, but I certainly think it is worth

0:15:24.880 --> 0:15:26.960
<v Speaker 2>taking a shot at at plus twelve under. Again, we

0:15:26.960 --> 0:15:29.280
<v Speaker 2>talked about his month to month splits. You look at

0:15:29.280 --> 0:15:31.720
<v Speaker 2>what he did in April versus May versus June. I

0:15:31.720 --> 0:15:33.840
<v Speaker 2>think he's already got seven home runs. He is a

0:15:33.880 --> 0:15:36.720
<v Speaker 2>guy who was a touted prospect who we liked coming

0:15:36.720 --> 0:15:40.120
<v Speaker 2>into the year as a general sort of option in

0:15:40.160 --> 0:15:42.560
<v Speaker 2>the fantasy space. We were sort of thinking about it,

0:15:42.600 --> 0:15:45.480
<v Speaker 2>maybe for al Rookie of the Year, But you know,

0:15:45.680 --> 0:15:48.400
<v Speaker 2>I think Joe I might go a little deeper than

0:15:48.400 --> 0:15:50.160
<v Speaker 2>that if I'm going. First of all, he's not listed

0:15:50.200 --> 0:15:51.960
<v Speaker 2>on here and I haven't seen him. You know, DraftKings

0:15:51.960 --> 0:15:53.720
<v Speaker 2>is my book. I haven't seen him listed there. If

0:15:53.760 --> 0:15:56.040
<v Speaker 2>a Doley Scarcia is listed at your book, I would

0:15:56.120 --> 0:15:58.680
<v Speaker 2>like to know what he is listed at, necessarily if

0:15:58.720 --> 0:16:02.000
<v Speaker 2>you assuming that he qualifies a rookie. But Luis Garcia,

0:16:02.080 --> 0:16:04.360
<v Speaker 2>Joe is a guy who again pitching for the Astras,

0:16:04.360 --> 0:16:06.600
<v Speaker 2>and we just saw that they had an injury, right

0:16:06.680 --> 0:16:08.880
<v Speaker 2>they had an injury yesterday, which is going to guaranteed

0:16:08.960 --> 0:16:11.760
<v Speaker 2>keep him in irritation. He's been outstanding all year long.

0:16:11.880 --> 0:16:14.480
<v Speaker 2>The issue is with him, like Rodan, whether or not

0:16:14.480 --> 0:16:17.080
<v Speaker 2>I can came up He's a plus four thousand. That's

0:16:17.120 --> 0:16:19.080
<v Speaker 2>something where I'm willing to take the sean, especially because

0:16:19.080 --> 0:16:20.480
<v Speaker 2>the Astros are going to get a lot of pub

0:16:20.480 --> 0:16:22.040
<v Speaker 2>and I don't know how many of these awards are

0:16:22.040 --> 0:16:23.600
<v Speaker 2>going to be able to lock down again. All their

0:16:23.600 --> 0:16:26.720
<v Speaker 2>batters are contributing, but he's been absolutely solid this year.

0:16:26.920 --> 0:16:30.160
<v Speaker 2>At plus four thousand, those are long odds. That's something

0:16:30.200 --> 0:16:32.800
<v Speaker 2>that I wouldn't mind having a little bit of action on.

0:16:33.000 --> 0:16:35.360
<v Speaker 2>But I do agree that mount Castle because I don't

0:16:35.360 --> 0:16:37.280
<v Speaker 2>think he's quite as good as we've seen the last month.

0:16:37.320 --> 0:16:39.000
<v Speaker 2>But I do think that he's going to continue to

0:16:39.120 --> 0:16:42.000
<v Speaker 2>generally ascend. And again, Rookie of the Year not a

0:16:42.000 --> 0:16:44.640
<v Speaker 2>team award. It is something where it's just going to

0:16:44.680 --> 0:16:46.800
<v Speaker 2>be his performance. So I don't mind it. At plus twelve.

0:16:46.680 --> 0:16:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Hundred, I'll tell you what to wander, Franco. Keep the

0:16:49.080 --> 0:16:51.080
<v Speaker 1>eye on. It gets ten to one right now, and

0:16:51.600 --> 0:16:53.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're kind of remiss. Another reason why the

0:16:53.840 --> 0:16:56.320
<v Speaker 1>American League so I Young Award races wide open is

0:16:56.320 --> 0:16:58.720
<v Speaker 1>because Tyler Glasnaw is out of it now. Correct that

0:16:58.880 --> 0:17:00.480
<v Speaker 1>was probably going to be that guy, So we were

0:17:00.560 --> 0:17:03.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of, you know, should have mentioned that injury being

0:17:03.120 --> 0:17:07.000
<v Speaker 1>a huge between that Bieber and Cole with his lack

0:17:07.040 --> 0:17:10.879
<v Speaker 1>of spider tack, all of a sudden, a very different

0:17:10.920 --> 0:17:13.000
<v Speaker 1>dynamic in that race than it was just a month ago.

0:17:13.040 --> 0:17:15.280
<v Speaker 1>And that is amazing. And this is why sometimes with

0:17:15.320 --> 0:17:18.440
<v Speaker 1>these major awards. It's helpful to wait, or you put

0:17:18.440 --> 0:17:20.520
<v Speaker 1>some chips down, then you like it, you keep putting

0:17:20.600 --> 0:17:22.840
<v Speaker 1>chips on it again, and you kind of reevaluate where

0:17:22.880 --> 0:17:24.960
<v Speaker 1>you're at. On the National League side, you got Ian

0:17:25.000 --> 0:17:28.119
<v Speaker 1>Anderson at plus six hundred, and then you got Kabrian

0:17:28.200 --> 0:17:31.040
<v Speaker 1>Hayes at plus three fifty. National league has not been

0:17:31.119 --> 0:17:33.840
<v Speaker 1>as heavy this year with rookie talent or maybe one

0:17:33.920 --> 0:17:36.199
<v Speaker 1>or two still to come here to make up for

0:17:36.320 --> 0:17:40.080
<v Speaker 1>that ground. I still like Ian Anderson's look. Ian Anderson

0:17:40.080 --> 0:17:41.920
<v Speaker 1>has done a really good job this year. Caprian Hayes

0:17:41.920 --> 0:17:43.639
<v Speaker 1>missed a good chunk of the season. Hayes is a

0:17:43.680 --> 0:17:47.320
<v Speaker 1>very exciting player, good defensive player, good offensive player. But

0:17:47.359 --> 0:17:49.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I think for the chasm here between

0:17:49.280 --> 0:17:51.399
<v Speaker 1>these two guys plus three fifty and plus six hundred,

0:17:51.400 --> 0:17:54.320
<v Speaker 1>give me Ian Anderson still just because once again a

0:17:54.359 --> 0:17:56.760
<v Speaker 1>higher profile team. But maybe you have a different line

0:17:56.800 --> 0:17:58.239
<v Speaker 1>of thinking when it comes to Rookie of the Year

0:17:58.280 --> 0:17:59.840
<v Speaker 1>in the National League. I do.

0:18:00.240 --> 0:18:03.320
<v Speaker 2>I definitely would go with Anderson over Carian Hayes at

0:18:03.320 --> 0:18:05.720
<v Speaker 2>this point, just because Hayes missed so much time. So

0:18:05.760 --> 0:18:07.119
<v Speaker 2>I think, I mean, that's what you said, right, That's

0:18:07.160 --> 0:18:09.199
<v Speaker 2>where you were leaning as well, Yeah, I am to

0:18:09.240 --> 0:18:11.040
<v Speaker 2>the extent. I'm going to go with one of those

0:18:11.040 --> 0:18:12.480
<v Speaker 2>two guys that will be that guy. But there are

0:18:12.480 --> 0:18:14.720
<v Speaker 2>a couple of other guys that we're not really talking

0:18:14.760 --> 0:18:18.159
<v Speaker 2>about that much that people aren't big. One is Trevor Rodgers, right,

0:18:18.240 --> 0:18:20.520
<v Speaker 2>I mean, he's got thirty he's at plus thirty five hundred,

0:18:20.720 --> 0:18:23.440
<v Speaker 2>Jazz Chisholm plus three thousand, now he's battled some injury

0:18:23.480 --> 0:18:26.119
<v Speaker 2>and stuff like that. And Jonathan India, which depending on

0:18:26.160 --> 0:18:27.959
<v Speaker 2>your book, there are some books that still love him

0:18:28.000 --> 0:18:30.640
<v Speaker 2>out there plus four thousand. Others are much shorter. But

0:18:30.680 --> 0:18:32.800
<v Speaker 2>those are three guys who I might look at because

0:18:33.000 --> 0:18:36.119
<v Speaker 2>you know, again, Ian Anderson, my guess is going to

0:18:36.160 --> 0:18:37.760
<v Speaker 2>win it. He would be my favorite, so I would

0:18:37.760 --> 0:18:40.359
<v Speaker 2>certainly have some action on him, and not Cabrian Hayes,

0:18:40.359 --> 0:18:42.880
<v Speaker 2>because again Hayes just missed too much time. But again,

0:18:42.920 --> 0:18:45.359
<v Speaker 2>when you're talking about Rogers, you're talking about India, especially

0:18:45.400 --> 0:18:47.280
<v Speaker 2>if the Reds can find their way into the postseason,

0:18:47.280 --> 0:18:49.560
<v Speaker 2>which isn't that long of a shot or anything like that,

0:18:49.800 --> 0:18:52.000
<v Speaker 2>he could get some more notoriety and then he can

0:18:52.040 --> 0:18:54.080
<v Speaker 2>get some more attention and get that put onto him.

0:18:54.119 --> 0:18:56.200
<v Speaker 2>So for him. I'm gonna have a little bit on India,

0:18:56.240 --> 0:18:57.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna have a little bit on jazz chism, and

0:18:57.840 --> 0:18:59.800
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna have a little bit on Trevor Rodgers as

0:18:59.840 --> 0:19:02.399
<v Speaker 2>well well as Ian Anderson, but I'm ignoring his entirely.

0:19:02.880 --> 0:19:05.040
<v Speaker 1>And as Dan mentioned, you can go to bettingpros dot

0:19:05.040 --> 0:19:07.000
<v Speaker 1>com and find all these different books and make sure

0:19:07.000 --> 0:19:09.360
<v Speaker 1>you can make the wager you want to make at

0:19:09.359 --> 0:19:13.000
<v Speaker 1>the correct odds that you like. That's the nice thing

0:19:13.000 --> 0:19:15.040
<v Speaker 1>about bettingpros dot com, if you're able to do that

0:19:15.080 --> 0:19:17.119
<v Speaker 1>sort of stuff. All right, let's go and take a

0:19:17.160 --> 0:19:20.119
<v Speaker 1>look at the divisions real quick. We are self loathing

0:19:20.119 --> 0:19:23.800
<v Speaker 1>Met fans, and we are obviously very very upfront about that.

0:19:24.680 --> 0:19:26.320
<v Speaker 1>We were both kind of looking at the Braves, and

0:19:26.400 --> 0:19:28.200
<v Speaker 1>right now the Braves are looking up at the Mets.

0:19:28.359 --> 0:19:30.440
<v Speaker 1>The Mets are minus four hundred right now, and the

0:19:30.480 --> 0:19:33.199
<v Speaker 1>betting consensus lied to win the division, the Braves are

0:19:33.200 --> 0:19:36.240
<v Speaker 1>plus them fifty. The Nats kind of scratch back into things,

0:19:36.280 --> 0:19:38.760
<v Speaker 1>believe it or not, on the bat of Kyle Schwarber

0:19:39.000 --> 0:19:41.320
<v Speaker 1>and the arm of Max Schers or plus eight hundred.

0:19:41.680 --> 0:19:43.840
<v Speaker 1>But it really does feel like the Mets division to

0:19:43.920 --> 0:19:46.359
<v Speaker 1>lose at this point. The Braves have had a myriad

0:19:46.400 --> 0:19:49.200
<v Speaker 1>of injuries as well, So this is a big stay

0:19:49.240 --> 0:19:51.760
<v Speaker 1>away from me in the East, and I'm glad to

0:19:51.800 --> 0:19:54.199
<v Speaker 1>be wrong as a Mets fan that, you know, the

0:19:54.240 --> 0:19:58.159
<v Speaker 1>Mets actually are playing up to expectations for once in

0:19:58.200 --> 0:20:01.399
<v Speaker 1>a very long time. Any feel here any concerns about

0:20:01.400 --> 0:20:02.960
<v Speaker 1>this Mets number being too big?

0:20:03.600 --> 0:20:05.399
<v Speaker 2>It does seem a little too big to me. I

0:20:05.440 --> 0:20:06.919
<v Speaker 2>do think that the Mets are going to win the

0:20:06.920 --> 0:20:09.119
<v Speaker 2>division even when they deal with injuries and they're not

0:20:09.119 --> 0:20:11.000
<v Speaker 2>scoring any runs. You know, they're gonna add something at

0:20:11.000 --> 0:20:13.240
<v Speaker 2>the deadline, as we talked about before the season started.

0:20:13.280 --> 0:20:16.520
<v Speaker 2>But minus four hundred cents is the equivalent of eighty percent.

0:20:16.680 --> 0:20:18.440
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure if I feel that it's greater than

0:20:18.440 --> 0:20:20.680
<v Speaker 2>eighty percent that the Mets are going to win this division,

0:20:20.960 --> 0:20:23.000
<v Speaker 2>especially with the only other team that I look at

0:20:23.000 --> 0:20:25.520
<v Speaker 2>that I might sprinkle on not the Braves, because again,

0:20:25.560 --> 0:20:27.720
<v Speaker 2>I think this is kind of the year that finally

0:20:28.040 --> 0:20:30.920
<v Speaker 2>the Pythagorean theory caught up with the Braves here where

0:20:30.920 --> 0:20:33.440
<v Speaker 2>they're always you know, down in the projections. The Nationals

0:20:33.440 --> 0:20:35.840
<v Speaker 2>are playing really, really well, and they're doing it without

0:20:36.000 --> 0:20:38.320
<v Speaker 2>much going on right now, if they do get a

0:20:38.359 --> 0:20:41.040
<v Speaker 2>little healthier, if Strasbourg does come back, if they add

0:20:41.080 --> 0:20:43.320
<v Speaker 2>something at the deadline, I know, but Soto even has

0:20:43.359 --> 0:20:45.400
<v Speaker 2>been out. If Josh Bell finds a stroke a little bit,

0:20:45.560 --> 0:20:47.760
<v Speaker 2>they have the potential to make a little bit of

0:20:47.800 --> 0:20:49.760
<v Speaker 2>a run here. And they're over five hundred, so plus

0:20:49.840 --> 0:20:51.679
<v Speaker 2>seven hundred, plus eight hundred, depending on where you can

0:20:51.720 --> 0:20:53.679
<v Speaker 2>get it. At Fox Bed it's plus eleven hundred. I'm

0:20:53.720 --> 0:20:56.080
<v Speaker 2>certainly interested in those odds, but I'll probably have a

0:20:56.080 --> 0:20:58.560
<v Speaker 2>little bit there. But again, I do think the overwhelming

0:20:58.600 --> 0:21:00.960
<v Speaker 2>probability is that the Mets win division. But I'm not trrey.

0:21:00.960 --> 0:21:03.240
<v Speaker 2>I feel it minus four hundred, which is again about

0:21:03.240 --> 0:21:06.160
<v Speaker 2>eighty percent. I'm not trying. I feel that confident.

0:21:06.200 --> 0:21:08.640
<v Speaker 1>Jack Flaherty went on the il and the Cardinals fell

0:21:08.680 --> 0:21:11.240
<v Speaker 1>off the map of the Brewers, who I loved coming

0:21:11.240 --> 0:21:13.480
<v Speaker 1>into the season. Then I had a little buyer's remorse

0:21:13.560 --> 0:21:17.000
<v Speaker 1>on they know, minus two hundred very solid favor here

0:21:17.240 --> 0:21:19.399
<v Speaker 1>the Cubs of plus three hundred, they've come crashing back

0:21:19.440 --> 0:21:21.119
<v Speaker 1>down to earth. The Reds still can't get out of

0:21:21.160 --> 0:21:23.680
<v Speaker 1>their own way. Of plus seven hundred, So really, again,

0:21:23.720 --> 0:21:25.640
<v Speaker 1>I think this is the Brewers to lose. And I'm

0:21:25.640 --> 0:21:27.359
<v Speaker 1>trying to remember where we were at with the Brews

0:21:27.359 --> 0:21:29.680
<v Speaker 1>going into the season. Was it four hundred four to

0:21:29.720 --> 0:21:31.760
<v Speaker 1>fifth something like that? Right? Was even greater than that?

0:21:32.040 --> 0:21:33.600
<v Speaker 2>No, No, I think it was less. I think it

0:21:33.640 --> 0:21:35.919
<v Speaker 2>was like three thou I remember half for four thirty

0:21:36.240 --> 0:21:38.120
<v Speaker 2>by the time we got it, Yeah, and we we

0:21:38.119 --> 0:21:40.840
<v Speaker 2>were over it. And again the biggest, the biggest liability

0:21:40.840 --> 0:21:42.640
<v Speaker 2>that I have right now are the Brewers over eighty

0:21:42.640 --> 0:21:45.080
<v Speaker 2>two and a half wins. That was my biggest bet

0:21:45.280 --> 0:21:47.000
<v Speaker 2>that I made coming into the year because again we

0:21:47.040 --> 0:21:49.239
<v Speaker 2>talked about it, and think of Joe, we you know,

0:21:49.480 --> 0:21:52.040
<v Speaker 2>we talked about it all the time. Their lineup is

0:21:52.320 --> 0:21:55.720
<v Speaker 2>like embarrassingly bad and they are still just winning, led

0:21:55.760 --> 0:21:59.200
<v Speaker 2>by as you mentioned it, the big three of Woodruff, Corbyn,

0:21:59.200 --> 0:22:00.440
<v Speaker 2>Burns and Freddie.

0:22:00.000 --> 0:22:02.320
<v Speaker 1>All shining the game at the end with Hater. Let's

0:22:02.320 --> 0:22:04.359
<v Speaker 1>exactly not take that out of the equation because it's not.

0:22:04.359 --> 0:22:08.240
<v Speaker 2>But Devin Williams hasn't been as good as It's true again,

0:22:08.280 --> 0:22:10.080
<v Speaker 2>but we thought Williams would be great. He's not. But

0:22:10.160 --> 0:22:12.400
<v Speaker 2>either way, it doesn't matter, man, And they probably will

0:22:12.400 --> 0:22:14.879
<v Speaker 2>add somebody at the deadline because the Cubs right now

0:22:14.920 --> 0:22:16.520
<v Speaker 2>are in second place. They are five games back. The

0:22:16.560 --> 0:22:18.960
<v Speaker 2>Cubs don't want to be here, by the way, right now,

0:22:18.960 --> 0:22:21.480
<v Speaker 2>like they were not expecting to compete. They don't want

0:22:21.480 --> 0:22:23.520
<v Speaker 2>to have to go out and ad The Reds are,

0:22:23.600 --> 0:22:25.919
<v Speaker 2>you know whatever, just kind of hanging around. Their bullpen

0:22:26.040 --> 0:22:28.000
<v Speaker 2>is off on. The Cardinals, as you said, have kind

0:22:28.000 --> 0:22:29.840
<v Speaker 2>of fallen off the map. So I do think that

0:22:29.880 --> 0:22:32.200
<v Speaker 2>the Brewers are going to win this division. I don't

0:22:32.200 --> 0:22:34.119
<v Speaker 2>think any of the long shots are worth it, but

0:22:34.160 --> 0:22:36.479
<v Speaker 2>the odds on, you know, the Brewers are anywhere, as

0:22:36.480 --> 0:22:38.840
<v Speaker 2>you said, to minus two hundred to minus four hundred.

0:22:38.880 --> 0:22:40.520
<v Speaker 2>That's where I can get it at draftings. There's no

0:22:40.600 --> 0:22:42.639
<v Speaker 2>way I'm touching it at that. So for me, I

0:22:42.680 --> 0:22:44.600
<v Speaker 2>think the Brewers are going to win. But at this point,

0:22:44.600 --> 0:22:45.960
<v Speaker 2>I think all the value is gone.

0:22:46.400 --> 0:22:48.800
<v Speaker 1>And in terms of value, the Dodgers minus two hundred

0:22:48.800 --> 0:22:51.000
<v Speaker 1>for the West, the Padres plus two to fifty. As

0:22:51.000 --> 0:22:52.680
<v Speaker 1>good of a story as the Giants have been, it's

0:22:52.720 --> 0:22:55.560
<v Speaker 1>not realistic to win this division. I don't think this

0:22:55.600 --> 0:22:57.600
<v Speaker 1>new Trevor Bauer news that broke kind of throws a

0:22:57.640 --> 0:23:00.400
<v Speaker 1>little bit of a potential wrinkle in there too. Plus

0:23:00.440 --> 0:23:02.440
<v Speaker 1>two fifty if you believe in the Padres, and I do.

0:23:02.800 --> 0:23:04.480
<v Speaker 1>This might be your last shot to get in on this.

0:23:05.760 --> 0:23:08.560
<v Speaker 1>The Padres are for real. They've got pitching. You know,

0:23:08.880 --> 0:23:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Snow eventually will straighten himself out. But Darbush has been good,

0:23:11.560 --> 0:23:14.560
<v Speaker 1>must Grove's been good. I wish Paddock was less erratic.

0:23:14.680 --> 0:23:16.720
<v Speaker 1>And I don't mean to drop bars on you like

0:23:16.760 --> 0:23:19.320
<v Speaker 1>this at this time of the afternoon. But still for me,

0:23:19.600 --> 0:23:22.199
<v Speaker 1>it is the only money here worth wagering is on

0:23:22.240 --> 0:23:25.359
<v Speaker 1>the Padres side of this, and the Dodgers really, you know,

0:23:25.960 --> 0:23:28.120
<v Speaker 1>I think the Dodgers have taken advantage of the schedule

0:23:28.119 --> 0:23:30.359
<v Speaker 1>when they could, but outside of that, like, I'm not

0:23:30.520 --> 0:23:33.040
<v Speaker 1>blown away by how great and dominant the Dodgers are

0:23:33.040 --> 0:23:33.760
<v Speaker 1>this year so far.

0:23:34.200 --> 0:23:36.359
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I agree with you. And the Boer news, and

0:23:36.400 --> 0:23:38.200
<v Speaker 2>again the news that we were talking about is the

0:23:39.640 --> 0:23:42.000
<v Speaker 2>news that broke yesterday as we record this, that he

0:23:42.359 --> 0:23:45.400
<v Speaker 2>has been accused of assault. We have no idea what

0:23:45.440 --> 0:23:48.280
<v Speaker 2>the ramifications that are going to be necessarily going forward,

0:23:48.320 --> 0:23:51.080
<v Speaker 2>but it certainly adds some uncertainty and the Padres, again,

0:23:51.160 --> 0:23:53.639
<v Speaker 2>it goes back and forth, but the betting crows consens

0:23:53.720 --> 0:23:56.080
<v Speaker 2>us as of this moment because it moves all the time,

0:23:56.160 --> 0:23:57.560
<v Speaker 2>which is why if you like something, you had to

0:23:57.600 --> 0:24:00.760
<v Speaker 2>move on. It is right now plus two seven. That

0:24:00.760 --> 0:24:03.679
<v Speaker 2>corresponds to roughly a twenty seven percent chance. I think

0:24:03.680 --> 0:24:06.400
<v Speaker 2>there's a greater than twenty seven percent chance that the Padres,

0:24:06.440 --> 0:24:08.879
<v Speaker 2>who haven't even played that well yet this year and

0:24:08.920 --> 0:24:11.760
<v Speaker 2>are still just three games back, can win this division.

0:24:11.960 --> 0:24:14.080
<v Speaker 2>The Giants are a plus four eighty. I mean, given

0:24:14.080 --> 0:24:16.560
<v Speaker 2>how they've played, I agree, I don't think it's likely necessarily.

0:24:16.640 --> 0:24:18.399
<v Speaker 2>I'm fine, though, if you are, like, well, they're in

0:24:18.440 --> 0:24:20.080
<v Speaker 2>first place. I want to get in on it, okay,

0:24:20.160 --> 0:24:23.080
<v Speaker 2>I you know, I don't get on fire. I'll probably

0:24:23.119 --> 0:24:25.800
<v Speaker 2>it probably everybody. So for me, though, I agree with you, Joe,

0:24:25.800 --> 0:24:27.639
<v Speaker 2>there's no way I'm taking the Dodgers right now, especially

0:24:27.640 --> 0:24:29.359
<v Speaker 2>with the Bower and news, with everything that's going out

0:24:29.400 --> 0:24:31.760
<v Speaker 2>with the team. At minus whatever it is between two

0:24:31.880 --> 0:24:34.040
<v Speaker 2>hundred and three hundred, I will take the Padres have

0:24:34.040 --> 0:24:36.320
<v Speaker 2>plus two seventy. I do think that that's a good bet.

0:24:36.320 --> 0:24:38.720
<v Speaker 1>All right, switching gear to the American League the Razor

0:24:38.800 --> 0:24:41.719
<v Speaker 1>plus one forty, But I am not. I'm just not

0:24:41.720 --> 0:24:43.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna do it. I'm sorry, I'm out. The Red Sox

0:24:43.800 --> 0:24:46.639
<v Speaker 1>plus one seventy five intriguing. You know where I'm going

0:24:46.680 --> 0:24:49.119
<v Speaker 1>Plus four fifty Blue Jays, That's where I want to go.

0:24:49.240 --> 0:24:52.120
<v Speaker 1>This team's starting to find its identity. The Yankees look lost.

0:24:52.119 --> 0:24:54.159
<v Speaker 1>Now They're a plus four fifty two, which is one

0:24:54.200 --> 0:24:56.080
<v Speaker 1>of the rare times you're actually getting a value on

0:24:56.119 --> 0:24:58.840
<v Speaker 1>the Yankees. So Yankees and Blue Jays right now, those

0:24:58.840 --> 0:25:00.640
<v Speaker 1>are the two teams. If the Yankees go on a run,

0:25:00.960 --> 0:25:03.199
<v Speaker 1>they will add pieces. But these next three weeks are

0:25:03.240 --> 0:25:05.240
<v Speaker 1>going to tell the tale. If the Yankees play well,

0:25:05.480 --> 0:25:07.640
<v Speaker 1>this is going to be a minus number by August first.

0:25:07.640 --> 0:25:09.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm telling you they is going to be a minus

0:25:09.840 --> 0:25:12.360
<v Speaker 1>number by August first if they rattle off. I don't

0:25:12.440 --> 0:25:14.560
<v Speaker 1>like a twenty and ten over their next thirty games

0:25:14.640 --> 0:25:17.640
<v Speaker 1>or something like that. And that's not outside the rama possibility.

0:25:18.000 --> 0:25:20.760
<v Speaker 1>But the Blue Jays because Robbie Ray's pitch well, because

0:25:20.800 --> 0:25:23.600
<v Speaker 1>they seem to have, you know, chips to move as well.

0:25:23.960 --> 0:25:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Marcus Simeon has played very well. George Spring are finally

0:25:26.840 --> 0:25:28.960
<v Speaker 1>coming back. I think there's a confidence growing here with

0:25:28.960 --> 0:25:31.840
<v Speaker 1>his young Blue Jay team. That's what I like. But look,

0:25:32.040 --> 0:25:33.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm kind of ignoring the Red Sox, who have been

0:25:33.960 --> 0:25:36.520
<v Speaker 1>pretty solid all year long. So what's your take on

0:25:36.560 --> 0:25:37.560
<v Speaker 1>the American League East.

0:25:38.040 --> 0:25:40.240
<v Speaker 2>I'm right there with you. The Blue Jays are by

0:25:40.280 --> 0:25:42.080
<v Speaker 2>far my favorite bet right now. They are only five

0:25:42.119 --> 0:25:43.800
<v Speaker 2>games over five hundred. They're six and a half out

0:25:43.800 --> 0:25:45.800
<v Speaker 2>of first The Raises we talked about we both like

0:25:45.840 --> 0:25:47.560
<v Speaker 2>the Rays, or at least I remember I did. I

0:25:47.560 --> 0:25:48.360
<v Speaker 2>don't remember if you did.

0:25:48.480 --> 0:25:53.000
<v Speaker 1>You did before. I was concerned about Glass Now can

0:25:53.000 --> 0:25:54.600
<v Speaker 1>he be the ace? Can he be a two hundred

0:25:54.600 --> 0:25:57.480
<v Speaker 1>inning guy? I don't know, and I'm I'm sad that

0:25:57.520 --> 0:26:00.480
<v Speaker 1>he's not, because he was spectacular when he was wakingout out.

0:26:00.600 --> 0:26:03.560
<v Speaker 2>But that injury completely changes where they are. So look,

0:26:03.560 --> 0:26:06.000
<v Speaker 2>the Red Sox at plus money right now, but again,

0:26:06.160 --> 0:26:08.280
<v Speaker 2>that Red Sox pitching staff man that's not going to

0:26:08.320 --> 0:26:10.280
<v Speaker 2>get it done over the long haul. And kudos to

0:26:10.320 --> 0:26:12.280
<v Speaker 2>the team and kudos to Kora for giving them minute.

0:26:12.320 --> 0:26:15.240
<v Speaker 2>The Blue Jays have an awesome team, and again they

0:26:15.240 --> 0:26:17.679
<v Speaker 2>have been they've been sort of just treading water right now,

0:26:17.760 --> 0:26:20.159
<v Speaker 2>and they haven't had Springer all year long. As you mentioned,

0:26:20.280 --> 0:26:23.200
<v Speaker 2>he just came back. Cavin Bigio has basically been lost

0:26:23.200 --> 0:26:25.359
<v Speaker 2>in the desert. He was probably battling that neck injury

0:26:25.400 --> 0:26:28.200
<v Speaker 2>his entire time he's back, he is playing better as well.

0:26:28.240 --> 0:26:31.639
<v Speaker 2>You mentioned Marcus Simeon, Taskar Hernandez Bobaschet is again a

0:26:31.680 --> 0:26:34.959
<v Speaker 2>guy who's gonna factor in probably the MVP conversation if

0:26:35.000 --> 0:26:37.639
<v Speaker 2>they didn't have one of the actual potential MVPs in

0:26:37.720 --> 0:26:40.240
<v Speaker 2>Vladimir Gerrera Junior. And then you have the pitching staff,

0:26:40.240 --> 0:26:42.359
<v Speaker 2>as you mentioned, Joe, which by the way, is strong

0:26:42.440 --> 0:26:44.640
<v Speaker 2>because of the fact that Robbie Ray has figured out

0:26:44.640 --> 0:26:47.600
<v Speaker 2>how to stop walking people. Ken jin Ryu is good.

0:26:47.760 --> 0:26:50.120
<v Speaker 2>Ross Stripling is sort of out there kind of keating.

0:26:49.920 --> 0:26:52.240
<v Speaker 1>Them in every time the last couple starts.

0:26:52.320 --> 0:26:54.400
<v Speaker 2>What they need to do is figure out the bullpen

0:26:54.440 --> 0:26:57.359
<v Speaker 2>because their bullpen has been pretty awful other than the

0:26:57.359 --> 0:26:59.320
<v Speaker 2>fact that Jordan Romanos seems to have kind of locked

0:26:59.320 --> 0:27:01.359
<v Speaker 2>down the ninth in. But they need to add to that.

0:27:01.400 --> 0:27:03.720
<v Speaker 2>But look, they're willing to go out there and make moves,

0:27:03.760 --> 0:27:06.720
<v Speaker 2>right They just added Corey Dickerson, just a fourth outfielder,

0:27:07.040 --> 0:27:08.800
<v Speaker 2>just to sort of do that. So I think they're

0:27:08.840 --> 0:27:10.399
<v Speaker 2>gonna go for it. I think they're gonna add and

0:27:10.440 --> 0:27:12.040
<v Speaker 2>I love it getting in at whatever you can get

0:27:12.080 --> 0:27:14.600
<v Speaker 2>it right now. Look it's at right now. The consensus again, Joe,

0:27:14.720 --> 0:27:18.040
<v Speaker 2>your quoting numbers. They move constantly, like it moves before

0:27:18.080 --> 0:27:20.120
<v Speaker 2>we start the podcast. Now right now, the consentus I'm

0:27:20.119 --> 0:27:23.840
<v Speaker 2>looking at is plus five hundred at DraftKings or ibet,

0:27:23.880 --> 0:27:26.679
<v Speaker 2>also plus five hundred at Fox Bet plus seven fifty, Like,

0:27:27.040 --> 0:27:28.719
<v Speaker 2>go out and grab that if you can make that

0:27:28.960 --> 0:27:31.399
<v Speaker 2>box bet. Yeah, right, buddy, that at plus five hundred,

0:27:31.400 --> 0:27:34.080
<v Speaker 2>I like that. I think they honestly, I think they're

0:27:34.080 --> 0:27:35.960
<v Speaker 2>going to win this division. So I'm putting my money

0:27:36.000 --> 0:27:36.520
<v Speaker 2>where my mouth.

0:27:36.720 --> 0:27:38.600
<v Speaker 1>Well, there's no money to be put on the central anymore.

0:27:38.600 --> 0:27:40.320
<v Speaker 1>I told you it was the White Sox before the year.

0:27:40.359 --> 0:27:43.320
<v Speaker 1>If you didn't listen then and then, I'm sorry I didn't.

0:27:43.480 --> 0:27:44.240
<v Speaker 2>I don't think I did.

0:27:44.320 --> 0:27:48.080
<v Speaker 1>Gone it is gone by bye minus six seventy what

0:27:48.800 --> 0:27:51.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, come on and look the Indians, I'm sorry

0:27:51.359 --> 0:27:53.280
<v Speaker 1>they can't catch it with Beaver being out to they

0:27:53.280 --> 0:27:57.120
<v Speaker 1>have injuries, Savali, the Twins have been dreadful. Let's go

0:27:57.160 --> 0:27:58.840
<v Speaker 1>to the West, which is a two horse race, just

0:27:58.880 --> 0:28:01.479
<v Speaker 1>like in the National League. The Astros minus three sixty,

0:28:01.600 --> 0:28:03.880
<v Speaker 1>which I understand why they're the favorites, and the A's

0:28:03.920 --> 0:28:06.120
<v Speaker 1>or plus two twenty five. You know, the A's could

0:28:06.160 --> 0:28:09.480
<v Speaker 1>absolutely scoop in there, especially that Bregman injury. That was

0:28:09.520 --> 0:28:11.280
<v Speaker 1>a bad one where he's gonna miss at least another

0:28:11.359 --> 0:28:13.640
<v Speaker 1>month or so. But the thing is, the Astros are

0:28:13.680 --> 0:28:16.600
<v Speaker 1>so deep, and I think that's kind of where I struggle,

0:28:16.600 --> 0:28:18.280
<v Speaker 1>because they seem to like, Okay, yeah, well we got

0:28:18.320 --> 0:28:19.800
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of other pictures we can just bring up

0:28:19.880 --> 0:28:21.840
<v Speaker 1>or or bring back in from the bullpen. And oh

0:28:21.880 --> 0:28:24.720
<v Speaker 1>we got Oderezi two and Christian Xavier And it's just

0:28:24.800 --> 0:28:26.480
<v Speaker 1>they've got a lot of depth, and I think at

0:28:26.480 --> 0:28:29.320
<v Speaker 1>the end of the day, that's what wins divisions, and

0:28:29.359 --> 0:28:32.160
<v Speaker 1>that's why I like the Mets. And I was cautiously optimistic,

0:28:32.240 --> 0:28:35.040
<v Speaker 1>but as good as the A's have played, I would

0:28:35.040 --> 0:28:36.679
<v Speaker 1>probably stay away from this. But if you want to

0:28:36.680 --> 0:28:38.920
<v Speaker 1>bed the A's at two twenty five, now's the time

0:28:38.960 --> 0:28:40.840
<v Speaker 1>to do it. Because these two teams, I think it

0:28:40.880 --> 0:28:42.280
<v Speaker 1>is going to be a two horse race all the

0:28:42.280 --> 0:28:43.080
<v Speaker 1>way down the stretch.

0:28:43.640 --> 0:28:46.360
<v Speaker 2>Look, I loved the Astros before the season started. They

0:28:46.360 --> 0:28:48.520
<v Speaker 2>were my pick based on their odds to win the

0:28:48.560 --> 0:28:51.080
<v Speaker 2>al and to win the World Series because again, this

0:28:51.440 --> 0:28:54.000
<v Speaker 2>was sort of a plausible scenario of this happening. Now

0:28:54.000 --> 0:28:55.640
<v Speaker 2>you mentioned it, they do have the Bregman injury and

0:28:55.680 --> 0:28:57.760
<v Speaker 2>it's not good. He's probably at at least another month.

0:28:57.920 --> 0:28:59.960
<v Speaker 2>As we just talked about when we're talking about Luis Carcia.

0:29:00.320 --> 0:29:02.800
<v Speaker 2>It just had an injury to Jose Er Chidi last

0:29:02.840 --> 0:29:05.760
<v Speaker 2>night as we record this. But like you said, plenty

0:29:05.800 --> 0:29:09.720
<v Speaker 2>of depth in that rotation in their lineup. It's really

0:29:09.720 --> 0:29:12.240
<v Speaker 2>difficult for me to see the A's even though they're

0:29:12.240 --> 0:29:14.280
<v Speaker 2>only one and a half games back as we record this,

0:29:14.680 --> 0:29:17.120
<v Speaker 2>it's still really hard for me to see them getting there.

0:29:17.320 --> 0:29:19.120
<v Speaker 2>At plus two twenty five, it's just not enough to

0:29:19.120 --> 0:29:21.440
<v Speaker 2>interest me. But also, like you said, like at minus

0:29:21.440 --> 0:29:23.680
<v Speaker 2>three sixty or whatever the Astros are right now, also

0:29:23.720 --> 0:29:25.880
<v Speaker 2>not enough to entice me. I don't think it's more

0:29:25.960 --> 0:29:28.440
<v Speaker 2>than you know, seventy eight point three percent chance that

0:29:28.480 --> 0:29:30.640
<v Speaker 2>they're going to necessarily win that division. So it's a

0:29:30.680 --> 0:29:32.560
<v Speaker 2>stay away from me. I'm pretty sure the Astros are

0:29:32.560 --> 0:29:33.959
<v Speaker 2>gonna win it, but it's not worth it either way

0:29:34.000 --> 0:29:34.360
<v Speaker 2>to bet it.

0:29:34.800 --> 0:29:37.840
<v Speaker 1>Let's see how Dan feels about the Astros winning the

0:29:37.880 --> 0:29:40.440
<v Speaker 1>American League. They are at the top plus three hundred.

0:29:40.800 --> 0:29:43.360
<v Speaker 1>My White Sox at plus three twenty five, I would

0:29:43.360 --> 0:29:45.760
<v Speaker 1>still go in there. There's nothing for me to think

0:29:45.760 --> 0:29:47.880
<v Speaker 1>that the White Sox in a short series with Giolito,

0:29:48.200 --> 0:29:52.240
<v Speaker 1>with Lanceln, Carlos, Rodan, Dallas Kichel can't get the job done,

0:29:52.280 --> 0:29:54.200
<v Speaker 1>and if it can get Copek healthy and all this

0:29:54.240 --> 0:29:56.520
<v Speaker 1>other stuff going, look the White Sox to me or

0:29:56.560 --> 0:29:58.560
<v Speaker 1>that team, as much as I would love to see

0:29:58.560 --> 0:30:00.000
<v Speaker 1>the Astros in the World Series, because I think if

0:30:00.120 --> 0:30:02.560
<v Speaker 1>hilarious and Major League Baseball will be so angry about it.

0:30:03.320 --> 0:30:05.800
<v Speaker 1>The A's at plus six fifty the Yankees at plus seven.

0:30:05.880 --> 0:30:10.120
<v Speaker 1>Isn't it hilarious that the Yankee number is to the

0:30:10.200 --> 0:30:13.360
<v Speaker 1>Yankee numbers at plus seven hundred to win the American League? Gettion?

0:30:13.560 --> 0:30:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Just the kind of premium you still pay on the

0:30:15.080 --> 0:30:18.240
<v Speaker 1>Yankees regardless even though they're like a plus five just

0:30:18.240 --> 0:30:21.680
<v Speaker 1>to win their own damn division. Yep, madness. But I

0:30:21.680 --> 0:30:23.600
<v Speaker 1>mean to me, it's the White Sox that's the bet,

0:30:23.680 --> 0:30:26.160
<v Speaker 1>that's the focus. Three plus three twenty five. That's a

0:30:26.200 --> 0:30:28.239
<v Speaker 1>pretty good number, and you can get more than that.

0:30:28.400 --> 0:30:31.520
<v Speaker 1>Take it, And I'm fine with the Astros as well.

0:30:31.560 --> 0:30:35.240
<v Speaker 1>But any other long shots for you A's, Yankees, Red Sox,

0:30:35.320 --> 0:30:38.120
<v Speaker 1>or even Blue Jays at this point who are eleven

0:30:38.160 --> 0:30:38.560
<v Speaker 1>to one.

0:30:38.880 --> 0:30:40.719
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Blue Jays are the only other one that I'm

0:30:40.760 --> 0:30:42.320
<v Speaker 2>going at. I agree with you that the Astros and

0:30:42.360 --> 0:30:44.800
<v Speaker 2>the White Sox are the overwhelming favorites. Imagine they'll remember

0:30:44.800 --> 0:30:47.360
<v Speaker 2>the White Texts are doing all of this without Eloy

0:30:47.440 --> 0:30:49.760
<v Speaker 2>jim Andez, without Louise Robert, and they might have both

0:30:49.800 --> 0:30:51.640
<v Speaker 2>of them back by the time the playoffs run around,

0:30:51.640 --> 0:30:54.440
<v Speaker 2>So certainly they are kind of the team to consider.

0:30:54.480 --> 0:30:56.560
<v Speaker 2>But I do agree with the Again we talked about it,

0:30:56.560 --> 0:30:58.440
<v Speaker 2>the Blue Jays and the Yankees are basically the same

0:30:58.440 --> 0:31:00.160
<v Speaker 2>thing to win the division, and yet the Yanks these

0:31:00.160 --> 0:31:02.200
<v Speaker 2>are plus seven hundred to win the AL and the

0:31:02.200 --> 0:31:04.840
<v Speaker 2>Blue Jays are at plus eleven hundred. The Blue Jays,

0:31:04.880 --> 0:31:06.040
<v Speaker 2>by the way I get it, I mean in the

0:31:06.080 --> 0:31:08.040
<v Speaker 2>wild card game, the Yankees have the better chance because

0:31:08.080 --> 0:31:11.480
<v Speaker 2>they do have the overall single best pitcher with Garrett Cole,

0:31:11.560 --> 0:31:13.360
<v Speaker 2>who might be knocked down a little bit, but in

0:31:13.440 --> 0:31:16.240
<v Speaker 2>a short series like you know, the Jays right now

0:31:16.560 --> 0:31:18.560
<v Speaker 2>have a rotation that can go out there again with

0:31:18.640 --> 0:31:22.080
<v Speaker 2>for you again, you know, if Manoa it can pitch

0:31:22.120 --> 0:31:25.600
<v Speaker 2>to his potential sort of whereas sure, right exactly so

0:31:25.760 --> 0:31:28.280
<v Speaker 2>for me at plus eleven hundred, I'm definitely having a

0:31:28.320 --> 0:31:30.360
<v Speaker 2>little bit on them, but that's the only one other

0:31:30.440 --> 0:31:31.960
<v Speaker 2>than the two that we've talked about, the Astros and

0:31:31.960 --> 0:31:33.320
<v Speaker 2>the White Tax, so they can see making of that.

0:31:33.920 --> 0:31:36.160
<v Speaker 1>The National League is still open for me. Plus one

0:31:36.240 --> 0:31:38.680
<v Speaker 1>ninety five for the Dodgers, plus three fifty for the Pods,

0:31:38.840 --> 0:31:42.160
<v Speaker 1>plus four to fifty for the Mets, who I think

0:31:42.200 --> 0:31:43.840
<v Speaker 1>we're really going to be in this too. And they

0:31:43.960 --> 0:31:45.880
<v Speaker 1>got the Brewers, you know, at plus six fifty with

0:31:45.920 --> 0:31:49.560
<v Speaker 1>those three pitchers. This is tough for me. I still

0:31:49.600 --> 0:31:51.400
<v Speaker 1>want to see a little bit more from all these

0:31:51.440 --> 0:31:54.360
<v Speaker 1>teams before I dip into this one. And if I'm

0:31:54.360 --> 0:31:56.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna take a shot here, I think it's actually on

0:31:56.200 --> 0:31:58.360
<v Speaker 1>the Mets, believe it or not, because they have that

0:31:58.400 --> 0:32:01.320
<v Speaker 1>one transcendent pitcher and we've seen that before where you

0:32:01.320 --> 0:32:04.160
<v Speaker 1>could throw him that's automatic WS sometimes in those games,

0:32:05.080 --> 0:32:06.840
<v Speaker 1>you know that feeling in New York it's it's a

0:32:06.840 --> 0:32:09.400
<v Speaker 1>tough place to go into play. Padres are a good

0:32:09.480 --> 0:32:11.160
<v Speaker 1>number two, but I think the Mets are the most

0:32:11.160 --> 0:32:13.480
<v Speaker 1>appealing on the board right now from what I've seen

0:32:13.560 --> 0:32:16.120
<v Speaker 1>and where the numbers are. How about you to look

0:32:16.160 --> 0:32:17.120
<v Speaker 1>to go to the World Series.

0:32:17.440 --> 0:32:20.640
<v Speaker 2>We are simpatico again. We're seeing the board very similarly.

0:32:20.680 --> 0:32:22.800
<v Speaker 2>And again, as you mentioned, we are self loathing. That's

0:32:22.800 --> 0:32:25.200
<v Speaker 2>fan so believe me, this is not homerism, it's anywhere.

0:32:25.360 --> 0:32:28.400
<v Speaker 2>This is towards the opposits. But you think about the player, right,

0:32:28.400 --> 0:32:30.720
<v Speaker 2>we agree that they are the probably overwhelming favorite to

0:32:30.720 --> 0:32:32.360
<v Speaker 2>win their division. Of course, which is great, right. You

0:32:32.360 --> 0:32:34.320
<v Speaker 2>don't want to have that one game playoff, assuming that

0:32:34.360 --> 0:32:36.520
<v Speaker 2>the grom comes out of it healthy. You look at

0:32:36.520 --> 0:32:39.880
<v Speaker 2>what the rotation could potentially be in a short and

0:32:39.920 --> 0:32:42.840
<v Speaker 2>Seria Stroman has been fantastic this entire year, and again

0:32:42.880 --> 0:32:44.920
<v Speaker 2>we liked him coming into the year. We are not

0:32:45.040 --> 0:32:48.520
<v Speaker 2>optimistic about when we're going to see Carlos Carrasco and

0:32:48.560 --> 0:32:51.320
<v Speaker 2>Noah Sinderguard. But if you're talking about are we going

0:32:51.400 --> 0:32:54.120
<v Speaker 2>to see them in three months from now by the

0:32:54.160 --> 0:32:56.760
<v Speaker 2>time the playoffs were all around, well that's a better chance,

0:32:56.840 --> 0:32:59.280
<v Speaker 2>especially if you've got a team that might have locked

0:32:59.320 --> 0:32:59.840
<v Speaker 2>up the division.

0:33:00.040 --> 0:33:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Continue been fantastic.

0:33:02.240 --> 0:33:05.240
<v Speaker 2>And Taiwan Walker exactly, and again in a short series,

0:33:05.280 --> 0:33:07.400
<v Speaker 2>one of those guys goes to the bullpen. Maybe Thor

0:33:07.480 --> 0:33:09.800
<v Speaker 2>goes to the bullpen like he did when they made

0:33:09.920 --> 0:33:12.040
<v Speaker 2>right the playoffs in that first year. So maybe this

0:33:12.120 --> 0:33:13.959
<v Speaker 2>is something where this is what they're gonna do, So

0:33:14.040 --> 0:33:16.920
<v Speaker 2>I do think again, in a short series, it's really

0:33:16.960 --> 0:33:18.960
<v Speaker 2>hard to beat the Dodgers, and it's probably gonna be

0:33:18.960 --> 0:33:20.720
<v Speaker 2>pretty hard to beat the Padres because their pitching is

0:33:20.720 --> 0:33:23.160
<v Speaker 2>solid overall, especially if they get it sorted out. But

0:33:23.200 --> 0:33:25.400
<v Speaker 2>the one team that can really do it is the Mets.

0:33:25.520 --> 0:33:27.920
<v Speaker 2>You mentioned the Brewers. I don't necessarily mind it again

0:33:28.000 --> 0:33:30.280
<v Speaker 2>because they have the pitching. As we said, to go

0:33:30.320 --> 0:33:32.840
<v Speaker 2>after them in a short series, but that's the cutoff.

0:33:32.840 --> 0:33:34.880
<v Speaker 2>Nobody beyond the Brewers with a plus six fifty. But

0:33:34.920 --> 0:33:37.160
<v Speaker 2>I agree the best value for me is the Mets

0:33:37.160 --> 0:33:38.080
<v Speaker 2>a plus four to fifty.

0:33:38.280 --> 0:33:40.520
<v Speaker 1>And the trade deadline will also tell us a lot too.

0:33:40.680 --> 0:33:42.760
<v Speaker 1>These lines are gonna move, so watch these next couple

0:33:42.840 --> 0:33:45.360
<v Speaker 1>weeks very carefully. Yeah, and when those all happen, we'll

0:33:45.360 --> 0:33:47.120
<v Speaker 1>come back and do it all again, because we have

0:33:47.160 --> 0:33:49.840
<v Speaker 1>to take a look at it once again. The Dodgers

0:33:49.840 --> 0:33:52.440
<v Speaker 1>to win it all are plus three seventy five, the

0:33:52.480 --> 0:33:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Astros plus six fifty, the Padres eight hundred. Same thing

0:33:55.840 --> 0:33:57.640
<v Speaker 1>with the White Sox plus eight, and the Mets at

0:33:57.640 --> 0:34:00.760
<v Speaker 1>plus eight to fifty. You know, I White Sox and

0:34:00.800 --> 0:34:03.200
<v Speaker 1>Mets is kind of where I'm at right now. I

0:34:03.240 --> 0:34:06.040
<v Speaker 1>think Astros was another team that going into this year

0:34:06.240 --> 0:34:09.440
<v Speaker 1>I felt pretty strongly about. I think Astros, Padres, White Sox,

0:34:09.800 --> 0:34:12.440
<v Speaker 1>those are the teams I really kind of had designs

0:34:12.480 --> 0:34:15.080
<v Speaker 1>on to win it all, and still very early, we're

0:34:15.120 --> 0:34:18.120
<v Speaker 1>halfway through the season. It is a marathon. But right now,

0:34:18.200 --> 0:34:20.399
<v Speaker 1>is there something where you feel pretty confident that you want.

0:34:20.600 --> 0:34:22.840
<v Speaker 1>If I'm going to put a chip somewhere, where's it

0:34:22.840 --> 0:34:24.879
<v Speaker 1>going to be on one team to win it all?

0:34:25.360 --> 0:34:27.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? I mean again, if I could detach myself from

0:34:27.640 --> 0:34:29.640
<v Speaker 2>my fandom, it probably would be the Mets, because they

0:34:29.640 --> 0:34:31.879
<v Speaker 2>do seem like a team that's built. But I agree

0:34:31.920 --> 0:34:33.480
<v Speaker 2>with you with the White Sox. Look, I like the Ash.

0:34:33.560 --> 0:34:35.120
<v Speaker 2>I got them at plus again. I think it was

0:34:35.160 --> 0:34:36.960
<v Speaker 2>twenty two hundred at the beginning of the season. They're

0:34:36.960 --> 0:34:38.920
<v Speaker 2>now at plus six fifty. That value is kind of

0:34:38.960 --> 0:34:41.080
<v Speaker 2>sucked right out of there. Again, we like the Blue

0:34:41.120 --> 0:34:42.840
<v Speaker 2>Jays for if we like them at the value for

0:34:42.920 --> 0:34:45.040
<v Speaker 2>the American League. I like them at plus twenty five

0:34:45.120 --> 0:34:47.319
<v Speaker 2>hundred necessarily to win the World Series as well. So

0:34:47.360 --> 0:34:49.560
<v Speaker 2>that's the only other kind of long shot that I

0:34:49.640 --> 0:34:52.480
<v Speaker 2>might go after. But realistically it's hard to get away

0:34:52.480 --> 0:34:55.200
<v Speaker 2>from any of the top five teams maybe, but if

0:34:55.200 --> 0:34:58.160
<v Speaker 2>you did it, probably for me would be the Blue Jays,

0:34:58.200 --> 0:35:00.000
<v Speaker 2>because again, this is a team. If they add like

0:35:00.200 --> 0:35:03.880
<v Speaker 2>one big bullpen piece, maybe one more starter, that offense

0:35:03.920 --> 0:35:05.920
<v Speaker 2>can just carry them absolutely all the way through.

0:35:06.320 --> 0:35:08.359
<v Speaker 1>All right, I want to remind everybody make sure you

0:35:08.560 --> 0:35:12.360
<v Speaker 1>follow us over on YouTube and subscribe to the YouTube

0:35:12.440 --> 0:35:14.799
<v Speaker 1>channel at Betting Pros, and of course subscribe to the

0:35:14.840 --> 0:35:17.279
<v Speaker 1>podcast wherever you get your podcast. Betting Pros is the

0:35:17.360 --> 0:35:20.120
<v Speaker 1>name of the pod, and we do some really fun stuff.

0:35:20.120 --> 0:35:23.920
<v Speaker 1>We cover it all NBA, golf, Baseball, NFL seasons right

0:35:23.920 --> 0:35:25.719
<v Speaker 1>around the corner, So make sure you subscribe to get

0:35:25.760 --> 0:35:28.480
<v Speaker 1>all that fantastic content, and don't forget to watch Dan

0:35:28.520 --> 0:35:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Harrison myself every morning Monday through Friday, nine am Eastern

0:35:32.120 --> 0:35:35.160
<v Speaker 1>on leading Off. Again. We'll check in on all these

0:35:35.280 --> 0:35:38.240
<v Speaker 1>MLB lines again in a few weeks to see what's changed,

0:35:38.280 --> 0:35:41.600
<v Speaker 1>because in last month a lot has and sometimes that's

0:35:41.640 --> 0:35:43.680
<v Speaker 1>the nature of the beast. So that'll do it for us.

0:35:43.680 --> 0:35:45.960
<v Speaker 1>But the story of the game goes on. For Dan Harris,

0:35:46.000 --> 0:35:48.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm Joe, Pi's with you. We'll see you next time.

0:35:48.160 --> 0:36:03.799
<v Speaker 1>Gibbs