WEBVTT - IBM, Airlines Earnings Breakdown; Baker Hughes Reports; Award Shows in Focus

0:00:02.080 --> 0:00:05.880
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Intelligence with Alex Steinhl and Paul'sweenye.

0:00:05.960 --> 0:00:09.200
<v Speaker 2>The real app performance has been the US corporate high yield.

0:00:09.360 --> 0:00:11.680
<v Speaker 3>Are the companies lean enough? Have they trimmed all the fats?

0:00:11.800 --> 0:00:15.360
<v Speaker 2>The semiconductor business is a really cyclical business.

0:00:15.080 --> 0:00:18.680
<v Speaker 1>Breaking market headlines and corporate news from across the globe.

0:00:18.720 --> 0:00:21.360
<v Speaker 3>Do investors like the M and A that we've seen?

0:00:21.560 --> 0:00:24.640
<v Speaker 2>These are two big time blue chip companies.

0:00:24.800 --> 0:00:28.400
<v Speaker 3>The window between the peak and cut changing super fast.

0:00:28.560 --> 0:00:32.479
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence with Alex Steinhl and Paul'sweenye.

0:00:31.960 --> 0:00:33.200
<v Speaker 4>On Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:34.080 --> 0:00:36.800
<v Speaker 2>Today's Bloomberg Intelligence Show, we dig inside the big business

0:00:36.800 --> 0:00:38.839
<v Speaker 2>stories impacting Wall Street and the global markets.

0:00:39.080 --> 0:00:41.159
<v Speaker 3>Each and every week we provide in depth research and

0:00:41.240 --> 0:00:43.040
<v Speaker 3>data on some of the two thousand companies and one

0:00:43.120 --> 0:00:45.800
<v Speaker 3>hundred and thirty industries are analysts cover worldwide.

0:00:45.840 --> 0:00:48.280
<v Speaker 2>Today we take a look at momentum for cruise lines

0:00:48.280 --> 0:00:49.400
<v Speaker 2>in twenty twenty four.

0:00:49.240 --> 0:00:52.480
<v Speaker 3>Plus the future of award shows may be at risk.

0:00:52.680 --> 0:00:54.880
<v Speaker 3>But first, it was a real week of earnings with

0:00:54.960 --> 0:00:57.960
<v Speaker 3>names like Netflix, Tesla, and IBM reporting. For more on

0:00:58.000 --> 0:01:00.920
<v Speaker 3>the numbers from IBM, we spoke with Bloomberg Intelligence Senior

0:01:00.960 --> 0:01:02.840
<v Speaker 3>technology analyst an Arab Rana.

0:01:02.920 --> 0:01:05.000
<v Speaker 5>One of the biggest things we talked about was the

0:01:05.000 --> 0:01:07.840
<v Speaker 5>free cash flow number came out at twelve billion. I

0:01:07.840 --> 0:01:09.880
<v Speaker 5>think we were you know, we were slightly above the

0:01:10.160 --> 0:01:12.120
<v Speaker 5>street and saying that, you know, I'll be happy if

0:01:12.120 --> 0:01:14.959
<v Speaker 5>they do eleven billion. So I think that really speaks

0:01:15.040 --> 0:01:19.039
<v Speaker 5>both to the organic growth rate of the company, operational efficiencies,

0:01:19.200 --> 0:01:23.039
<v Speaker 5>you know, improving margins, taking care of accounts, receivers, all

0:01:23.080 --> 0:01:25.800
<v Speaker 5>sorts of things. So I think it's really good print

0:01:25.840 --> 0:01:29.320
<v Speaker 5>for IBM in terms of free cash flow, but also

0:01:29.400 --> 0:01:33.360
<v Speaker 5>the you know, the guidance on the you know, organic

0:01:33.400 --> 0:01:35.920
<v Speaker 5>growth rate because we were going in so in fourth

0:01:36.000 --> 0:01:38.679
<v Speaker 5>quarter they did three percent growth rate in constant currency.

0:01:38.920 --> 0:01:41.360
<v Speaker 5>We thought, at least for the first you know, few quarters,

0:01:41.400 --> 0:01:43.520
<v Speaker 5>they're going to talk about three to four percent and

0:01:43.560 --> 0:01:45.840
<v Speaker 5>then accel rate, but they strayed away went with a

0:01:45.880 --> 0:01:49.280
<v Speaker 5>mid single digit number. So I think overall, good for IBM,

0:01:49.400 --> 0:01:51.680
<v Speaker 5>good for the rest of the tech space, and I

0:01:51.720 --> 0:01:53.120
<v Speaker 5>feel pretty happy about it.

0:01:54.120 --> 0:01:56.040
<v Speaker 3>What I know, this is kind of a probably dumb question,

0:01:56.120 --> 0:01:58.320
<v Speaker 3>but like what in IBM's business model to let it

0:01:58.440 --> 0:02:00.960
<v Speaker 3>like me, are they doing well, like break down the

0:02:00.960 --> 0:02:02.960
<v Speaker 3>different categories in a way that makes sense to alex

0:02:03.800 --> 0:02:04.639
<v Speaker 3>So they I mean.

0:02:04.520 --> 0:02:07.360
<v Speaker 5>They still are a very big piece of the entire

0:02:07.440 --> 0:02:10.080
<v Speaker 5>tech ecosystem. They have very strong relationships, they have a

0:02:10.080 --> 0:02:13.960
<v Speaker 5>good consulting business, they have red hat, they tell mainframes. Now,

0:02:14.000 --> 0:02:16.160
<v Speaker 5>remember one thing, I mean, I know people got very

0:02:16.520 --> 0:02:20.000
<v Speaker 5>getting very excited. But if software spending is climbing between

0:02:20.040 --> 0:02:23.119
<v Speaker 5>ten to twelve percent, IBM still growing you know, six

0:02:23.200 --> 0:02:26.280
<v Speaker 5>to seven, So they are still underperforming the entire broader

0:02:26.360 --> 0:02:28.880
<v Speaker 5>software space. But that's okay because you know, when you

0:02:28.960 --> 0:02:31.600
<v Speaker 5>go from three to six, that's a big change. Also

0:02:31.720 --> 0:02:34.400
<v Speaker 5>in terms of the growth rates. This is just a

0:02:34.400 --> 0:02:37.240
<v Speaker 5>matter of overall tech spending improving after two years of

0:02:37.320 --> 0:02:39.800
<v Speaker 5>under investment. This is something that we have been saying

0:02:39.840 --> 0:02:42.720
<v Speaker 5>for so long. Tick as a portion of total GDP

0:02:42.880 --> 0:02:45.680
<v Speaker 5>is a very small number. Most of the companies around

0:02:45.720 --> 0:02:48.519
<v Speaker 5>the world, barring the consumer technology companies that we see,

0:02:48.720 --> 0:02:53.480
<v Speaker 5>have underinvested in technology. So when you have rail companies

0:02:53.600 --> 0:02:56.880
<v Speaker 5>or airlines or auto insurance companies, they really need to

0:02:56.880 --> 0:02:59.520
<v Speaker 5>be more digital. And one way to get digital is

0:02:59.560 --> 0:03:02.200
<v Speaker 5>to move a lot of their infrastructure to the cloud.

0:03:02.360 --> 0:03:04.520
<v Speaker 5>So all of those things play in well. We have

0:03:04.639 --> 0:03:07.160
<v Speaker 5>not seen good spending in two years. I'm pretty happy

0:03:07.160 --> 0:03:10.040
<v Speaker 5>that twenty twenty four May we may see a rebound.

0:03:10.880 --> 0:03:14.919
<v Speaker 2>How does IBM and fit into the AI discussion, because

0:03:14.919 --> 0:03:17.800
<v Speaker 2>I know the CEO called out the client demand for

0:03:17.840 --> 0:03:20.959
<v Speaker 2>AI is accelerating. How do they play in that space.

0:03:21.800 --> 0:03:23.680
<v Speaker 5>The majority of the stuff that they're going to do

0:03:23.800 --> 0:03:25.560
<v Speaker 5>is on the consulting side. So if you are a

0:03:25.639 --> 0:03:27.600
<v Speaker 5>large company, you need to figure out what to do.

0:03:27.919 --> 0:03:29.760
<v Speaker 5>They have a lot of consultants that can help you

0:03:29.840 --> 0:03:32.919
<v Speaker 5>clean up the data. You know, use whichever model we

0:03:33.000 --> 0:03:34.640
<v Speaker 5>want to use. You want to use something from open

0:03:34.639 --> 0:03:37.560
<v Speaker 5>ai Andthropic, all these companies that are out there. They'll

0:03:37.560 --> 0:03:40.160
<v Speaker 5>help you with that, help you train the models, and

0:03:40.240 --> 0:03:42.200
<v Speaker 5>then at the end of the day make it for

0:03:42.280 --> 0:03:45.120
<v Speaker 5>your business case. It's not as easy as just you know,

0:03:45.240 --> 0:03:49.240
<v Speaker 5>using chat, GPD and answering questions for this. For an

0:03:49.360 --> 0:03:51.720
<v Speaker 5>enterprise use, you need to do a lot of data

0:03:51.760 --> 0:03:55.160
<v Speaker 5>clean up, data aggregation because that's what's needed to clean

0:03:55.200 --> 0:03:57.360
<v Speaker 5>up your you know, the models itself.

0:03:57.840 --> 0:03:59.960
<v Speaker 3>How fast and long can that kind of growth rate

0:04:00.120 --> 0:04:01.560
<v Speaker 3>six seven percent go?

0:04:02.720 --> 0:04:04.480
<v Speaker 5>I think if this year they are able to go

0:04:04.560 --> 0:04:07.080
<v Speaker 5>to six seven percent, you know, I could expect then

0:04:07.280 --> 0:04:09.240
<v Speaker 5>you know, another one hundred to two hundred basis points

0:04:09.240 --> 0:04:12.240
<v Speaker 5>improvement next year. And that's actually not a bad deal

0:04:12.240 --> 0:04:14.640
<v Speaker 5>because you remember the old IBM just about four or

0:04:14.640 --> 0:04:17.120
<v Speaker 5>five years ago, they were not growing at all. So

0:04:17.279 --> 0:04:20.000
<v Speaker 5>in order for them to actually come up with a

0:04:20.040 --> 0:04:22.919
<v Speaker 5>high single legit number next year would be would be

0:04:23.000 --> 0:04:24.719
<v Speaker 5>really welcome by the market.

0:04:24.960 --> 0:04:28.120
<v Speaker 2>So what's the read through here, Anna rog for you know,

0:04:28.240 --> 0:04:30.840
<v Speaker 2>greater tech here from IBM? Is can I say I'm

0:04:30.880 --> 0:04:32.440
<v Speaker 2>just going to go out and start buying more of

0:04:32.440 --> 0:04:34.440
<v Speaker 2>these stats I'm looking at like Nvidia for example, up

0:04:34.440 --> 0:04:36.159
<v Speaker 2>twenty five percent year to date and of course up

0:04:36.200 --> 0:04:38.440
<v Speaker 2>two hundred and twenty percent over the trailing twelve months.

0:04:39.000 --> 0:04:40.599
<v Speaker 2>I guess this is a pretty good readthrough? Is that?

0:04:40.640 --> 0:04:41.159
<v Speaker 2>Can I do that?

0:04:41.880 --> 0:04:44.120
<v Speaker 5>Yeah? So, for you know, we had run a CIO

0:04:44.200 --> 0:04:46.480
<v Speaker 5>survey back in December, and you know, we were we

0:04:47.000 --> 0:04:49.359
<v Speaker 5>kind of got the indication that it's going to be

0:04:49.400 --> 0:04:52.360
<v Speaker 5>a year of spending more aggressively compared to the last

0:04:52.360 --> 0:04:54.880
<v Speaker 5>two in twenty twenty four. But you know, the way

0:04:54.920 --> 0:04:56.920
<v Speaker 5>we had built that and you know, we got the

0:04:57.000 --> 0:04:59.880
<v Speaker 5>chip strength going on right now that probably carries on

0:05:00.200 --> 0:05:02.719
<v Speaker 5>the summer, and then after that we see you know,

0:05:02.760 --> 0:05:05.800
<v Speaker 5>strength in the software and the consulting area, which are

0:05:05.839 --> 0:05:08.320
<v Speaker 5>more of the downstream play. But it's possible that we

0:05:08.400 --> 0:05:10.640
<v Speaker 5>may see that bounce back, you know, as early as

0:05:10.680 --> 0:05:14.080
<v Speaker 5>second quarter road, you know, going into it because you

0:05:14.120 --> 0:05:16.400
<v Speaker 5>know things, I think the leading indicators are good at

0:05:16.400 --> 0:05:19.880
<v Speaker 5>this point. So so I'm pretty optimistic that you know,

0:05:19.920 --> 0:05:22.680
<v Speaker 5>when we were thinking about a second half recovery for

0:05:23.000 --> 0:05:25.560
<v Speaker 5>tech spending, you know it may actually happen in second

0:05:25.640 --> 0:05:28.360
<v Speaker 5>quarter road, maybe even as late late as first.

0:05:28.160 --> 0:05:31.359
<v Speaker 3>Quarter our thanks to Bloomberg Intelligence senior technology analyst and

0:05:31.440 --> 0:05:32.560
<v Speaker 3>er Agrana.

0:05:32.160 --> 0:05:35.040
<v Speaker 2>Let's turn out to airlines or names like American, Southwest

0:05:35.040 --> 0:05:38.400
<v Speaker 2>and Alaska air surprised analysts by beating expectations for more.

0:05:38.400 --> 0:05:41.000
<v Speaker 2>We spoke with Bloomberg Intelligence senior defense and airlines analysts

0:05:41.040 --> 0:05:41.760
<v Speaker 2>George Ferguson.

0:05:42.120 --> 0:05:46.040
<v Speaker 6>You know we got American, Alaska and Southwest yields were

0:05:46.080 --> 0:05:49.280
<v Speaker 6>down in the domestic business on all three. Alaska yields

0:05:49.320 --> 0:05:53.599
<v Speaker 6>were down six or seven percent, American yields down similar number.

0:05:54.520 --> 0:05:57.839
<v Speaker 6>Southwest really just let a load factor fade away into

0:05:57.839 --> 0:06:00.760
<v Speaker 6>the seventies and took a yield down to two percent.

0:06:01.320 --> 0:06:04.360
<v Speaker 6>So to me, you know they're guiding to better results

0:06:04.440 --> 0:06:07.039
<v Speaker 6>is as you know, next year, as we get into

0:06:07.040 --> 0:06:09.120
<v Speaker 6>one que doesn't look great, but as we get past

0:06:09.200 --> 0:06:11.560
<v Speaker 6>one queue, the overall guidance for the year looks a

0:06:11.600 --> 0:06:14.040
<v Speaker 6>bit better. So airlines, I think, I think things are

0:06:14.200 --> 0:06:16.400
<v Speaker 6>going to affirm as they get into next year, but

0:06:16.440 --> 0:06:18.800
<v Speaker 6>I don't think it looks like a healthy market at all.

0:06:18.880 --> 0:06:20.600
<v Speaker 6>From the numbers I'm seeing huge.

0:06:20.360 --> 0:06:22.680
<v Speaker 2>Forour So give us a sense of where we are

0:06:22.760 --> 0:06:25.120
<v Speaker 2>and just in terms of air travel, have we established

0:06:25.120 --> 0:06:29.760
<v Speaker 2>a new post pandemic normality in terms of where leisure

0:06:29.760 --> 0:06:31.560
<v Speaker 2>traffic is and where business traffic is? Do we kind

0:06:31.600 --> 0:06:34.160
<v Speaker 2>of know how that market looks?

0:06:34.279 --> 0:06:37.360
<v Speaker 6>So comments from United where that business traffic wasn't back

0:06:37.400 --> 0:06:40.640
<v Speaker 6>to the twenty nineteen levels, They said they saw hopeful

0:06:40.640 --> 0:06:45.160
<v Speaker 6>signs in one queue, So business hasn't come back fully.

0:06:45.560 --> 0:06:47.839
<v Speaker 6>Is this the new normal? I would guess it is

0:06:47.920 --> 0:06:51.000
<v Speaker 6>right because we're, you know, we're I don't know when

0:06:51.000 --> 0:06:53.920
<v Speaker 6>the pandemic actually sort of ended, but we're probably a

0:06:54.040 --> 0:06:56.760
<v Speaker 6>year and a half passed, and I would expect most

0:06:56.920 --> 0:07:00.520
<v Speaker 6>of you know, normality to have returned to our lives.

0:07:00.839 --> 0:07:03.240
<v Speaker 6>So it seems like we still have some level of

0:07:03.279 --> 0:07:07.760
<v Speaker 6>deficit on pre pandemic business travel, but leisure travel has

0:07:07.760 --> 0:07:11.880
<v Speaker 6>definitely exceeded that. I think the airlines are just sold capacity.

0:07:11.920 --> 0:07:14.280
<v Speaker 6>They would have sold the businesses into the leisure side,

0:07:14.360 --> 0:07:15.960
<v Speaker 6>and I think that's making the fair softer.

0:07:16.800 --> 0:07:19.600
<v Speaker 3>So you say that the quarter did that great, first

0:07:19.640 --> 0:07:22.000
<v Speaker 3>quarter looks soft. I get that, But then you said

0:07:22.000 --> 0:07:24.679
<v Speaker 3>that after Q one things start to look a little better.

0:07:25.320 --> 0:07:27.920
<v Speaker 3>What's going to look a little better. Is it business travel?

0:07:28.080 --> 0:07:30.400
<v Speaker 3>Is it we just keep doing vacation stuff, we do

0:07:30.440 --> 0:07:33.320
<v Speaker 3>it domestically rather internationally, or is it still across the board.

0:07:34.560 --> 0:07:37.720
<v Speaker 6>I said that after Q one, the airlines, I think

0:07:37.760 --> 0:07:40.560
<v Speaker 6>it's going to look better. I don't see it right.

0:07:40.560 --> 0:07:43.680
<v Speaker 6>I think the big leisure bounce back was last year

0:07:44.360 --> 0:07:47.240
<v Speaker 6>twenty twenty three, and I think that you could see

0:07:47.240 --> 0:07:50.240
<v Speaker 6>software domestic yields all through the year. But you know,

0:07:50.680 --> 0:07:53.960
<v Speaker 6>we had Scott Kirby at United Airlines earning earlier in

0:07:54.000 --> 0:07:56.960
<v Speaker 6>the week and he's telling us how you know, he's

0:07:57.000 --> 0:08:00.000
<v Speaker 6>getting traction from premium products and that's going to help

0:08:00.040 --> 0:08:03.680
<v Speaker 6>and drive better profitability through next year. I mean, you know,

0:08:03.760 --> 0:08:08.640
<v Speaker 6>companies like Alaska they have premium product, but I think

0:08:08.640 --> 0:08:11.680
<v Speaker 6>they're a roughly the same amount, unlike United that's adding it.

0:08:12.040 --> 0:08:15.880
<v Speaker 6>Southwest has no premium products, and there's a lot of

0:08:15.880 --> 0:08:18.240
<v Speaker 6>other airlines that have no premium product, and I think

0:08:18.240 --> 0:08:21.120
<v Speaker 6>they're going to be fighting for the base leisure traveler.

0:08:21.520 --> 0:08:23.960
<v Speaker 6>I think it's going to be difficult. But George against

0:08:23.960 --> 0:08:25.880
<v Speaker 6>the airline that they see it coming.

0:08:25.960 --> 0:08:29.200
<v Speaker 2>Sorry, George, you're at in Los Angeles the Aerospace Supply

0:08:29.480 --> 0:08:33.840
<v Speaker 2>Chain Conference. How is the supply chain for the airline industry?

0:08:33.920 --> 0:08:35.360
<v Speaker 2>Can they get the planes they need?

0:08:36.480 --> 0:08:40.520
<v Speaker 6>That's rough. So we saw the news. I'm boeing about

0:08:40.600 --> 0:08:44.760
<v Speaker 6>not allowing them to increase the discussion that the Aerospace

0:08:44.920 --> 0:08:48.640
<v Speaker 6>Supplier Conference is all about labor, labor and labor. There's

0:08:48.679 --> 0:08:50.840
<v Speaker 6>been a lot of turnover. Yeah, there's a lot of

0:08:50.840 --> 0:08:54.559
<v Speaker 6>turnover in the industry. The backfill needs to be trained.

0:08:54.920 --> 0:08:57.800
<v Speaker 6>They're not fully trained, they're not efficient, and there's still

0:08:57.800 --> 0:09:02.280
<v Speaker 6>people having a hard time finding and so the US

0:09:02.280 --> 0:09:05.839
<v Speaker 6>aerospace industry is in pretty tough, tough straits. I think

0:09:06.679 --> 0:09:08.320
<v Speaker 6>I think young kids, you know, a lot of discussion

0:09:08.360 --> 0:09:11.600
<v Speaker 6>here is that young kids, you know, young professionals don't

0:09:11.600 --> 0:09:14.600
<v Speaker 6>want to come to this industry. They'd rather work for Amazon,

0:09:14.640 --> 0:09:17.280
<v Speaker 6>they'd rather work for Google than go to work in

0:09:17.320 --> 0:09:20.120
<v Speaker 6>the aerospace industry. And so having a real hard time

0:09:20.760 --> 0:09:23.800
<v Speaker 6>backfilling and training and keeping people in the industry.

0:09:24.360 --> 0:09:28.200
<v Speaker 3>So to that point, what happens if Boeing isn't allowed

0:09:28.240 --> 0:09:31.560
<v Speaker 3>to produce the plane that the FAA said, I can't

0:09:31.559 --> 0:09:33.760
<v Speaker 3>even treat keep track, to be honest with you. But

0:09:34.000 --> 0:09:36.280
<v Speaker 3>if they can't produce it, what happens to those that

0:09:36.320 --> 0:09:37.120
<v Speaker 3>have ordered it?

0:09:38.240 --> 0:09:40.080
<v Speaker 6>I mean, right now, what the FA said is that

0:09:40.120 --> 0:09:44.240
<v Speaker 6>Bowing can't increase production right, increase of the mits they're

0:09:44.280 --> 0:09:47.000
<v Speaker 6>already building. They were building about thirty one a month

0:09:47.080 --> 0:09:49.559
<v Speaker 6>last year. They were supposed to rate break to about

0:09:49.640 --> 0:09:51.360
<v Speaker 6>thirty eight a month at the end of the year.

0:09:51.840 --> 0:09:54.360
<v Speaker 6>The question is have they so will the FA let

0:09:54.360 --> 0:09:57.080
<v Speaker 6>them continue at thirty eight? And then as I understand that,

0:09:57.120 --> 0:10:01.440
<v Speaker 6>the FA is going to inspect their manufacturing processes because

0:10:01.440 --> 0:10:05.200
<v Speaker 6>they're quite concerned obviously after the Alaska incident, to make

0:10:05.240 --> 0:10:09.320
<v Speaker 6>sure it's stable, make sure that Bone can build aircraft safely.

0:10:10.040 --> 0:10:11.599
<v Speaker 6>So my guess is you've got something that's going to

0:10:11.720 --> 0:10:14.800
<v Speaker 6>last part of this quarter. I mean, there's only so

0:10:14.880 --> 0:10:18.000
<v Speaker 6>many sites that can really inspect, right. You've got a

0:10:18.000 --> 0:10:20.600
<v Speaker 6>lot of inspection down in Wichita, a lot of inspection

0:10:20.679 --> 0:10:24.080
<v Speaker 6>up in Renton, Washington. Those are the two main factories.

0:10:24.600 --> 0:10:26.840
<v Speaker 6>If they could go deeper into so many other suppliers,

0:10:26.840 --> 0:10:29.000
<v Speaker 6>which they probably will, but there's not a lot of

0:10:29.000 --> 0:10:33.000
<v Speaker 6>sites to inspect. My guess is that deliveries for customers

0:10:33.000 --> 0:10:36.280
<v Speaker 6>that expect the airplanes in twenty twenty four could get

0:10:36.320 --> 0:10:39.280
<v Speaker 6>pushed out, probably will get pushed out, maybe into twenty

0:10:39.320 --> 0:10:45.280
<v Speaker 6>twenty five. Could be customers core customers like United Southwest, Ryanair,

0:10:46.080 --> 0:10:49.440
<v Speaker 6>Alaska Airlines. They've taken the majority of the orders recently,

0:10:49.960 --> 0:10:52.560
<v Speaker 6>so you'll hear some howling from them. I think you

0:10:52.600 --> 0:10:56.160
<v Speaker 6>already hurd some howling from United CEO Kirby right on

0:10:57.160 --> 0:11:00.360
<v Speaker 6>the Max ten. So I think that's what's you go

0:11:00.400 --> 0:11:03.000
<v Speaker 6>to see deliveries getting pushed out and pushed into next year.

0:11:03.559 --> 0:11:06.760
<v Speaker 6>Hopefully boll And can recover that and bounce to higher rates.

0:11:06.880 --> 0:11:08.280
<v Speaker 6>That's all about their recovery.

0:11:08.840 --> 0:11:10.520
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I just kind of feel like they're kind

0:11:10.520 --> 0:11:12.520
<v Speaker 2>of too big to fail, or too big for anybody

0:11:12.559 --> 0:11:14.960
<v Speaker 2>to really do anything, because it's a daopoly them an airbus.

0:11:14.960 --> 0:11:18.360
<v Speaker 2>But what is it like a downside scenario here for Fox?

0:11:18.360 --> 0:11:22.320
<v Speaker 2>It would it be government regulation, would it be what's

0:11:22.400 --> 0:11:23.880
<v Speaker 2>kind of spooking the market?

0:11:24.960 --> 0:11:27.000
<v Speaker 6>Well, I think you already have part of that downside,

0:11:27.040 --> 0:11:31.880
<v Speaker 6>right and that's more intense oversighting regulation. Frankly, that probably

0:11:31.880 --> 0:11:34.680
<v Speaker 6>should have occurred anyways. You know, the FAA has also

0:11:34.720 --> 0:11:37.560
<v Speaker 6>going through some difficult time during the pandemic, lost a

0:11:37.559 --> 0:11:41.880
<v Speaker 6>bunch of personnel. They need their skill sets developed sharpened,

0:11:43.080 --> 0:11:45.280
<v Speaker 6>so this process could be slow.

0:11:45.760 --> 0:11:46.240
<v Speaker 1>But I don't.

0:11:46.280 --> 0:11:49.439
<v Speaker 6>I mean, I do think they're you know, I think

0:11:49.480 --> 0:11:51.280
<v Speaker 6>they are close to too big to fail, given that

0:11:51.320 --> 0:11:55.240
<v Speaker 6>there's such an important government contractor you know, one of

0:11:55.240 --> 0:11:59.320
<v Speaker 6>the few big primes that can make airplanes in serial production.

0:12:01.360 --> 0:12:03.080
<v Speaker 6>Question is, you know, what could the government do if

0:12:03.080 --> 0:12:05.720
<v Speaker 6>they had real big problems on the commercial side. I

0:12:05.720 --> 0:12:07.840
<v Speaker 6>don't think we're there yet, though, I think it still

0:12:07.920 --> 0:12:10.080
<v Speaker 6>isn't duopoly. If you wanted to get in the back

0:12:10.080 --> 0:12:12.480
<v Speaker 6>of the line for an Airbus eight three twenty, the

0:12:12.520 --> 0:12:15.920
<v Speaker 6>competitor right now, you know, if we just add up

0:12:15.960 --> 0:12:19.560
<v Speaker 6>all the orders they have in their production increases, you're

0:12:19.600 --> 0:12:22.640
<v Speaker 6>out eight years. I think some of those orders are

0:12:22.640 --> 0:12:24.959
<v Speaker 6>definitely long data orders, so maybe if you got in

0:12:25.040 --> 0:12:26.720
<v Speaker 6>the back of that mind, you'd be out five or

0:12:26.760 --> 0:12:29.959
<v Speaker 6>six years before you started getting airplanes. That alone is

0:12:30.000 --> 0:12:33.880
<v Speaker 6>going to keep Boeing, keep folks going towards Boeing for airplanes.

0:12:34.480 --> 0:12:37.000
<v Speaker 6>But that's only if things don't degrade from air things

0:12:37.040 --> 0:12:39.440
<v Speaker 6>degrave from here, you got a much bigger problem.

0:12:39.480 --> 0:12:41.960
<v Speaker 2>Thanks to the Bloomberg Intelligence senior Defense and Airlines analyst

0:12:42.040 --> 0:12:43.160
<v Speaker 2>George Ferguson.

0:12:42.800 --> 0:12:45.319
<v Speaker 3>All right, coming up on the program, Baker Hughes breaks

0:12:45.360 --> 0:12:48.120
<v Speaker 3>free from rivals with a lower shale view. This year

0:12:48.240 --> 0:12:49.360
<v Speaker 3>we speak to the CEO.

0:12:49.760 --> 0:12:52.880
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to Bloomberg Intelligence on Bloomberg Radio, providing depth

0:12:52.920 --> 0:12:55.360
<v Speaker 2>research and data on two thousand companies and one hundred

0:12:55.360 --> 0:12:58.079
<v Speaker 2>and thirty industries. You can access Bloomberg Intelligence via b

0:12:58.240 --> 0:12:59.240
<v Speaker 2>I go on the terminal.

0:12:59.320 --> 0:13:02.360
<v Speaker 3>I'm Paul Sweeney and am Alex Steel, and this is Boomberg.

0:13:06.880 --> 0:13:11.040
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us Saturdays

0:13:11.040 --> 0:13:14.560
<v Speaker 1>at noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com, the iHeartRadio app

0:13:14.600 --> 0:13:17.520
<v Speaker 1>and the Bloomberg Business App, or listening on demand wherever

0:13:17.559 --> 0:13:20.320
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts.

0:13:20.720 --> 0:13:22.960
<v Speaker 3>Conflict in the Middle East and uncertainty in the global

0:13:22.960 --> 0:13:25.959
<v Speaker 3>economy have the energy sector facing a lot of unknowns.

0:13:26.120 --> 0:13:29.040
<v Speaker 2>Baker Hughes, the world's number three oil field contracted by

0:13:29.040 --> 0:13:31.800
<v Speaker 2>market value, is also filling the pressure. This week, the

0:13:31.840 --> 0:13:35.000
<v Speaker 2>firm announced earnings that will blow expectations and analysts are

0:13:35.080 --> 0:13:36.200
<v Speaker 2>raising concerns, all right.

0:13:36.240 --> 0:13:38.079
<v Speaker 3>To take us through how Baker Hughes plans to manage

0:13:38.120 --> 0:13:41.360
<v Speaker 3>all the risks facing oil, we spoke to Lorenzo Simonelli, Chairman,

0:13:41.480 --> 0:13:43.920
<v Speaker 3>president and CEO at Baker Hughes.

0:13:44.240 --> 0:13:46.679
<v Speaker 7>First of all, we're coming off some great results in

0:13:46.720 --> 0:13:49.280
<v Speaker 7>twenty twenty three, and also we've laid out a clear

0:13:49.360 --> 0:13:52.760
<v Speaker 7>strategy as Baker Hughes over the coming years. As you

0:13:52.800 --> 0:13:55.640
<v Speaker 7>look at twenty twenty four, we've given a guidance that

0:13:55.800 --> 0:13:59.240
<v Speaker 7>is the balanced approach with all of the geopolitical and

0:13:59.280 --> 0:14:03.040
<v Speaker 7>also onsetty that's happening around the globe. So we stick

0:14:03.120 --> 0:14:06.000
<v Speaker 7>to our guidance and we think that we're executing and

0:14:06.040 --> 0:14:08.760
<v Speaker 7>as you look at the guidance, we've got considerable growth

0:14:08.840 --> 0:14:11.720
<v Speaker 7>in twenty twenty four and great performance as well.

0:14:11.880 --> 0:14:15.360
<v Speaker 3>So if you're more conservative than your peers, where is

0:14:15.400 --> 0:14:18.120
<v Speaker 3>the question mark? Is it going to be the new

0:14:18.240 --> 0:14:21.280
<v Speaker 3>energy orders? Is it going to be on shore demand

0:14:21.360 --> 0:14:23.280
<v Speaker 3>or is it going to be offshore? Is it domestic

0:14:23.360 --> 0:14:26.520
<v Speaker 3>or international that has you thinking questioning the most.

0:14:26.840 --> 0:14:28.960
<v Speaker 7>You look at what's happening around the world, and you

0:14:29.000 --> 0:14:33.040
<v Speaker 7>see the geopolitics, you see what's happening from the opequ cuts.

0:14:33.120 --> 0:14:36.680
<v Speaker 7>You see what's happening from the consolidation in North America,

0:14:37.080 --> 0:14:41.120
<v Speaker 7>and that leads some uncertainty relative to the activity levels

0:14:41.120 --> 0:14:47.560
<v Speaker 7>within North America Land. We still see that North America

0:14:47.640 --> 0:14:50.880
<v Speaker 7>should be flatish, but US Land will likely be negative

0:14:50.920 --> 0:14:53.600
<v Speaker 7>for the year given some of the consolidation, and also

0:14:53.920 --> 0:14:56.960
<v Speaker 7>some of the activity international again will be in the

0:14:57.080 --> 0:14:59.920
<v Speaker 7>high single digits, So we still see that being robot

0:15:00.520 --> 0:15:03.200
<v Speaker 7>and I think again, as we look at giving guidance,

0:15:03.400 --> 0:15:07.040
<v Speaker 7>we're taking a balanced approach to what's taking place around

0:15:07.080 --> 0:15:10.720
<v Speaker 7>the world at this moment, and also giving a predictability

0:15:10.800 --> 0:15:13.720
<v Speaker 7>to our investors on what can be achieved and also

0:15:13.920 --> 0:15:15.400
<v Speaker 7>confidence in what we can achieve.

0:15:15.480 --> 0:15:17.960
<v Speaker 2>Lorenzo, I just looking at your business here and I

0:15:17.960 --> 0:15:19.840
<v Speaker 2>see that about three quarters of your revenue has comes

0:15:19.840 --> 0:15:22.880
<v Speaker 2>from outside of the United States. So obviously you are

0:15:22.920 --> 0:15:25.440
<v Speaker 2>attuned as much as anyone to the geopolitical risks around

0:15:25.480 --> 0:15:28.280
<v Speaker 2>the world. What are you telling your investors about what's

0:15:28.280 --> 0:15:31.360
<v Speaker 2>happening in Eastern Europe, what's happening in the Middle East,

0:15:31.400 --> 0:15:32.600
<v Speaker 2>and how that may impact your business.

0:15:32.680 --> 0:15:36.440
<v Speaker 7>We're telling them that we've taken every caution and also

0:15:36.520 --> 0:15:40.360
<v Speaker 7>we're managing the situation. We haven't seen any impact and

0:15:40.840 --> 0:15:44.680
<v Speaker 7>we don't anticipate a big impact, but we do think

0:15:44.760 --> 0:15:48.200
<v Speaker 7>some of the development plans may be delayed slightly over

0:15:48.200 --> 0:15:51.560
<v Speaker 7>the long term. No change in what the NOCs and

0:15:51.640 --> 0:15:55.080
<v Speaker 7>also large customers are laying out from a capital spend,

0:15:55.320 --> 0:15:58.080
<v Speaker 7>but there may be some i would say delays. Again,

0:15:58.240 --> 0:16:01.920
<v Speaker 7>as we look at the outlook internationally, we're still anticipating

0:16:02.320 --> 0:16:06.280
<v Speaker 7>high single digit growth and we think that international is

0:16:06.280 --> 0:16:08.240
<v Speaker 7>a key place for us to be and we look

0:16:08.280 --> 0:16:09.840
<v Speaker 7>to perform there over the coming years.

0:16:09.960 --> 0:16:12.600
<v Speaker 3>Lolrenzo, what's your take on the demand side.

0:16:12.360 --> 0:16:15.880
<v Speaker 7>Well, Alex, it's always difficult to predict some of these elements,

0:16:15.960 --> 0:16:18.240
<v Speaker 7>just like it is oil price and you know this

0:16:18.320 --> 0:16:22.800
<v Speaker 7>space well, I think demand continues to be robust. A

0:16:22.840 --> 0:16:26.320
<v Speaker 7>lot of it's going to depend on the economic situation

0:16:26.480 --> 0:16:30.000
<v Speaker 7>as you look at some of the events unfolding also globally,

0:16:30.440 --> 0:16:34.720
<v Speaker 7>and we anticipate that again demand will increase this year

0:16:35.200 --> 0:16:38.520
<v Speaker 7>and continue to be strong, especially in the developing world.

0:16:38.600 --> 0:16:41.280
<v Speaker 2>What are your customers telling you here? I know obviously

0:16:41.280 --> 0:16:44.240
<v Speaker 2>close contact with them. What are they telling you about

0:16:44.320 --> 0:16:47.000
<v Speaker 2>their spending plans over the next couple of years?

0:16:47.320 --> 0:16:52.160
<v Speaker 7>Again, it varies. You've seen in North America obviously some consolidation,

0:16:52.360 --> 0:16:55.440
<v Speaker 7>so people are going through that consolidation and they'll be

0:16:55.520 --> 0:16:58.720
<v Speaker 7>looking to adjust some of their spending plans in the

0:16:58.760 --> 0:17:02.760
<v Speaker 7>short term, but again continuing to be robust on the

0:17:02.800 --> 0:17:05.600
<v Speaker 7>long term as you continue to see the demand be there.

0:17:05.960 --> 0:17:10.800
<v Speaker 7>On the international side, these NOCs have multi year projects

0:17:10.800 --> 0:17:14.520
<v Speaker 7>that they're executing. There'll be some variation in the timing

0:17:14.560 --> 0:17:17.800
<v Speaker 7>of those, but again the long term continues to be solid,

0:17:18.200 --> 0:17:21.440
<v Speaker 7>and as you look at our guidance, again we're anticipating

0:17:21.800 --> 0:17:25.520
<v Speaker 7>that maybe there's some tempered view on some of the

0:17:25.640 --> 0:17:28.720
<v Speaker 7>case of the developments, but the developments are going to happen.

0:17:29.080 --> 0:17:32.680
<v Speaker 3>NC Paul just you know, national oil companies just pull

0:17:32.800 --> 0:17:37.320
<v Speaker 3>up with the oil jargon there, Lorenzo, you mentioned the

0:17:37.400 --> 0:17:39.800
<v Speaker 3>M and A situation, and I find that so interesting

0:17:39.840 --> 0:17:41.840
<v Speaker 3>because that was one of my questions to all these

0:17:41.840 --> 0:17:44.720
<v Speaker 3>CEOs when they announce these big mergers, is are you

0:17:44.760 --> 0:17:47.600
<v Speaker 3>actually going to be slowing your oil production growth over time?

0:17:47.600 --> 0:17:50.000
<v Speaker 3>And they're all like, no, no, no, no, no, it's

0:17:50.040 --> 0:17:51.800
<v Speaker 3>going to be really good, it's going to keep growing.

0:17:52.440 --> 0:17:54.919
<v Speaker 3>What do you think that timeline actually looks like? In

0:17:54.960 --> 0:17:57.040
<v Speaker 3>the beginning, their synergies, they get more out of the ground,

0:17:57.040 --> 0:17:58.920
<v Speaker 3>but then that tapers off. What do you notice?

0:17:59.080 --> 0:18:02.400
<v Speaker 7>So as you look at the normal evolution of consolidation

0:18:02.560 --> 0:18:05.840
<v Speaker 7>we've seen this cycle before. You are going to continue

0:18:05.880 --> 0:18:09.080
<v Speaker 7>to see production increases, but you're also going to see

0:18:09.119 --> 0:18:12.360
<v Speaker 7>synergies between the consolidation and as they go through their

0:18:12.400 --> 0:18:17.680
<v Speaker 7>integration activities, I think you'll likely see some temperate measures

0:18:17.720 --> 0:18:20.920
<v Speaker 7>relative to some of their procurement, but again production, they're

0:18:20.960 --> 0:18:24.440
<v Speaker 7>going to seize the opportunity to continue to increase production

0:18:24.800 --> 0:18:26.000
<v Speaker 7>as the demand is there.

0:18:26.160 --> 0:18:28.520
<v Speaker 2>You know, I'm not an expert in this, unlike Alex,

0:18:28.840 --> 0:18:30.760
<v Speaker 2>but a term you see here a lot, and I

0:18:30.760 --> 0:18:33.720
<v Speaker 2>don't hear it that much anymore is peak oil? When

0:18:33.720 --> 0:18:35.399
<v Speaker 2>are we going to be at peak oil? Are we

0:18:35.440 --> 0:18:38.479
<v Speaker 2>at peak? I don't hear that discussion anymore. So when

0:18:38.520 --> 0:18:40.879
<v Speaker 2>you're talking to investors, how do you talk to them

0:18:40.840 --> 0:18:44.399
<v Speaker 2>about the long term kind of demand for oil?

0:18:44.720 --> 0:18:46.600
<v Speaker 7>You've got to look at it from a standpoint of

0:18:46.760 --> 0:18:50.800
<v Speaker 7>the energy transition is going to be multi decades and

0:18:50.920 --> 0:18:54.640
<v Speaker 7>it's going to require an energy mix that is abundant

0:18:54.640 --> 0:18:59.920
<v Speaker 7>of providing as clean as possible fuel sources to the public,

0:19:00.119 --> 0:19:02.160
<v Speaker 7>and that means oil is going to have a role

0:19:02.240 --> 0:19:06.000
<v Speaker 7>to play, and we see oil and gas in particular

0:19:06.359 --> 0:19:09.320
<v Speaker 7>having a strong robust outlook as we go forward. And

0:19:09.760 --> 0:19:12.480
<v Speaker 7>the question on PEA coil has been asked many times.

0:19:12.920 --> 0:19:15.639
<v Speaker 7>There will be a time when PEA coil comes. I

0:19:15.680 --> 0:19:19.199
<v Speaker 7>think it's not at this stage, and we continue to

0:19:19.200 --> 0:19:22.040
<v Speaker 7>focus very much on gas and also LNG.

0:19:22.720 --> 0:19:27.840
<v Speaker 3>Lorenzo somehow restricting LNG exports in the US is becoming

0:19:27.880 --> 0:19:31.560
<v Speaker 3>something people are talking about. The permit process has gotten

0:19:31.640 --> 0:19:32.560
<v Speaker 3>a lot slower.

0:19:32.640 --> 0:19:36.400
<v Speaker 7>What is going on, alex It has gotten slower, and

0:19:36.480 --> 0:19:41.480
<v Speaker 7>again we're monitoring the situation, and I'm disappointed because as

0:19:41.520 --> 0:19:45.399
<v Speaker 7>you look at the benefits of USLNG not only for

0:19:45.480 --> 0:19:48.359
<v Speaker 7>the US, but also for the world and also what's

0:19:48.400 --> 0:19:53.160
<v Speaker 7>been achieved with the geopolitical uncertainty and also providing to Europe,

0:19:53.200 --> 0:19:55.840
<v Speaker 7>there's been commitments that have been made and we should

0:19:55.920 --> 0:20:00.680
<v Speaker 7>continue the USLNG exports and also the permitting of these projects.

0:20:01.160 --> 0:20:04.719
<v Speaker 7>That being said, international projects are continuing to move forward,

0:20:05.160 --> 0:20:08.200
<v Speaker 7>and we have an expectation that again in twenty twenty

0:20:08.200 --> 0:20:14.000
<v Speaker 7>four there'll be sixty five mtpa FIDD, and we're again

0:20:14.119 --> 0:20:18.480
<v Speaker 7>seeing about thirty to sixty mtpa FIDD in twenty five

0:20:18.520 --> 0:20:21.240
<v Speaker 7>and twenty six and by twenty thirty there'll be a

0:20:21.560 --> 0:20:25.879
<v Speaker 7>global capacity in place of eight hundred mtpa. So you know,

0:20:25.920 --> 0:20:29.399
<v Speaker 7>we'll monitor the US situation. It's disappointing. I think it

0:20:29.440 --> 0:20:31.880
<v Speaker 7>will sort itself out. There's been a lot of commitments

0:20:31.920 --> 0:20:34.400
<v Speaker 7>that have been made to international partners.

0:20:34.560 --> 0:20:38.239
<v Speaker 3>Lorenzo, I really appreciate that, the conservative approach and then

0:20:38.280 --> 0:20:40.480
<v Speaker 3>sort of moving a lot faster in the next couple

0:20:40.480 --> 0:20:42.320
<v Speaker 3>of years. Thanks a lot. I look forward to seeing

0:20:42.320 --> 0:20:45.440
<v Speaker 3>you next week in Florence, Italy. Thank you, Lorenzo Semonelli

0:20:45.520 --> 0:20:49.160
<v Speaker 3>for what good He's chairman, CEO and president of Baker Hughes.

0:20:49.320 --> 0:20:51.280
<v Speaker 3>Now we're going to do something that only Paul and

0:20:51.320 --> 0:20:53.920
<v Speaker 3>I can do. Talk to a CEO, then bring a

0:20:53.920 --> 0:20:56.640
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Intelligence analyst who's been covering the company for years

0:20:56.680 --> 0:20:58.480
<v Speaker 3>on to then talk about it. This is what we

0:20:58.480 --> 0:21:01.640
<v Speaker 3>can offer you. On the Bloomberg Inteligence Show every day

0:21:02.280 --> 0:21:05.560
<v Speaker 3>Scott Levine, he covers oil services for Bloomberg Intelligence. What

0:21:05.640 --> 0:21:07.399
<v Speaker 3>did you make of the numbers? And just talking with

0:21:07.440 --> 0:21:08.719
<v Speaker 3>Lorenzo in the last ten minutes.

0:21:09.240 --> 0:21:14.000
<v Speaker 8>Frankly, the guidance that Baker gave for mid teens EBITDA

0:21:14.119 --> 0:21:18.280
<v Speaker 8>growth is almost identical to what SLB gave. I think

0:21:18.320 --> 0:21:22.199
<v Speaker 8>the difference here is probably the conservatism around the messaging.

0:21:22.640 --> 0:21:27.480
<v Speaker 8>Number one, certainly the mid load to mid single digit

0:21:27.560 --> 0:21:31.000
<v Speaker 8>decline that they're calling for spending growth in North America,

0:21:31.680 --> 0:21:35.440
<v Speaker 8>high single digit growth in international trails what we saw

0:21:35.480 --> 0:21:39.240
<v Speaker 8>out of both of those two companies. And then secondarily,

0:21:39.800 --> 0:21:41.960
<v Speaker 8>you know LNG, as you mentioned, is a really big

0:21:42.040 --> 0:21:45.280
<v Speaker 8>driver for Baker, that's unique to them, certainly much more

0:21:45.320 --> 0:21:50.080
<v Speaker 8>so for them as a producer of modules for LNG plants,

0:21:50.480 --> 0:21:53.440
<v Speaker 8>which neither SLB and holl do. And I would say

0:21:53.440 --> 0:21:56.080
<v Speaker 8>that the commentary there was maybe a little bit more

0:21:56.680 --> 0:22:01.760
<v Speaker 8>downbeat as well. They're looking for modest growth FID capacity

0:22:01.840 --> 0:22:05.080
<v Speaker 8>this year. They focused more on some of the businesses

0:22:05.080 --> 0:22:07.320
<v Speaker 8>outside of that. So I think it's probably more so

0:22:07.520 --> 0:22:11.000
<v Speaker 8>the tone out of Baker being a bit more sober

0:22:11.520 --> 0:22:15.520
<v Speaker 8>than the guidance per se, which was in line with consensus.

0:22:15.720 --> 0:22:17.720
<v Speaker 8>And the growth outlooks similar to what we saw it

0:22:17.800 --> 0:22:19.040
<v Speaker 8>at the piers there.

0:22:19.119 --> 0:22:24.400
<v Speaker 2>So I'm looking at the an R function for Baker, Hughes, Hallibert,

0:22:24.560 --> 0:22:27.680
<v Speaker 2>all the comps. Street likes this stuff. They like these

0:22:28.119 --> 0:22:32.000
<v Speaker 2>oil services companies. What's the bull call on this? Is

0:22:32.080 --> 0:22:33.879
<v Speaker 2>this people you're going to need oil forever.

0:22:34.119 --> 0:22:37.000
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, well, you know, they are investing in the future

0:22:37.040 --> 0:22:40.480
<v Speaker 8>with the energy transition and the new energy business as well.

0:22:41.040 --> 0:22:42.040
<v Speaker 1>But I think you.

0:22:41.960 --> 0:22:44.479
<v Speaker 8>Know, so, look two years ago, twenty twenty two, this

0:22:44.600 --> 0:22:48.320
<v Speaker 8>group was outstanding, right, you know, the group was up

0:22:48.400 --> 0:22:51.200
<v Speaker 8>sixty percent, the market was down closed to twenty percent.

0:22:51.720 --> 0:22:55.840
<v Speaker 8>Last year, the group performed okay in a much stronger market,

0:22:56.520 --> 0:23:00.040
<v Speaker 8>and the growth expectations for the group have moderated and

0:23:00.080 --> 0:23:04.520
<v Speaker 8>are moderating still in twenty twenty four. I think within

0:23:04.560 --> 0:23:10.199
<v Speaker 8>that context, folks are still comfortable with large cap globally

0:23:10.359 --> 0:23:15.879
<v Speaker 8>diversified oil field service companies like Baker Hughes, like SLB,

0:23:16.000 --> 0:23:18.760
<v Speaker 8>to a lesser extent, Haliburton because they're more focused on

0:23:18.800 --> 0:23:23.000
<v Speaker 8>North America. But they're still comfortable with these companies. They're large,

0:23:23.040 --> 0:23:26.080
<v Speaker 8>they're global, the balance sheets are in good shape, they're

0:23:26.080 --> 0:23:30.600
<v Speaker 8>returning more than fifty percent of the free cash to investors,

0:23:30.640 --> 0:23:33.840
<v Speaker 8>and so that appeals to investors that kind of are

0:23:34.280 --> 0:23:38.720
<v Speaker 8>attuned to this new energy environment where it's discipline, growth

0:23:38.760 --> 0:23:43.159
<v Speaker 8>and capital returns rather than the wildcatter mentality. So I

0:23:43.160 --> 0:23:43.879
<v Speaker 8>think it's what I like.

0:23:44.040 --> 0:23:44.959
<v Speaker 5>I like the wildcatter.

0:23:45.280 --> 0:23:48.400
<v Speaker 3>I like that yeah, I called SLB slumbers. I'm definitely

0:23:48.400 --> 0:23:51.960
<v Speaker 3>gonna hear from them later, but SLB. So to that point, though,

0:23:52.440 --> 0:23:54.640
<v Speaker 3>I feel like if you talk to SLB they'll talk

0:23:54.680 --> 0:23:57.959
<v Speaker 3>a lot about digitalization and all that kind of stuff,

0:23:58.119 --> 0:24:02.160
<v Speaker 3>whereas Baker Hughes talks really about LNG and they build

0:24:02.359 --> 0:24:04.800
<v Speaker 3>these big terminals they help to do that, like with

0:24:04.840 --> 0:24:08.199
<v Speaker 3>the likes of Bechtel, for example. Do you feel like

0:24:08.240 --> 0:24:09.840
<v Speaker 3>at some point these guys are going to be you

0:24:09.880 --> 0:24:12.040
<v Speaker 3>can really bet on them different ways, Like I'm gonna

0:24:12.040 --> 0:24:14.120
<v Speaker 3>bet on Baker Hughes for LNG. I'm gonna bet an

0:24:14.160 --> 0:24:16.800
<v Speaker 3>SLB for an AI component and digitalization, Like can I

0:24:16.840 --> 0:24:17.440
<v Speaker 3>do that yet?

0:24:18.440 --> 0:24:22.159
<v Speaker 8>You can? And I think those are accurate depictions of

0:24:22.200 --> 0:24:27.040
<v Speaker 8>the business. But I wouldn't overstate their significance, Like I

0:24:27.080 --> 0:24:30.440
<v Speaker 8>feel like Halliburton gets maligned a lot for the North

0:24:30.480 --> 0:24:31.639
<v Speaker 8>American exposure, and.

0:24:31.640 --> 0:24:33.360
<v Speaker 3>They're also solid international.

0:24:33.680 --> 0:24:35.160
<v Speaker 8>It's over half their business.

0:24:35.240 --> 0:24:37.640
<v Speaker 3>I totally didn't know that until yeah, no the other day.

0:24:37.760 --> 0:24:41.400
<v Speaker 8>But SLB is eighty percent international, and these guys are

0:24:41.680 --> 0:24:44.080
<v Speaker 8>closer to SLB than they are to HOL in terms

0:24:44.119 --> 0:24:48.520
<v Speaker 8>of that geographic split. So you know, while the statement

0:24:48.640 --> 0:24:53.200
<v Speaker 8>is true, I think it's it's equal parts branding as

0:24:53.240 --> 0:24:55.919
<v Speaker 8>it is the business mix, and investors are naturally going

0:24:55.960 --> 0:24:58.479
<v Speaker 8>to look for ways to differentiate between the companies, and

0:24:58.520 --> 0:25:01.200
<v Speaker 8>so they'll, you know, they'll gravitate towards the differences more

0:25:01.200 --> 0:25:03.760
<v Speaker 8>than they will the similarities. But I think there are

0:25:03.760 --> 0:25:06.080
<v Speaker 8>a lot of similarities in the balance sheet. All the

0:25:06.080 --> 0:25:11.080
<v Speaker 8>companies are focused on global markets to more or lesser extent,

0:25:11.280 --> 0:25:16.199
<v Speaker 8>and so with Baker, the LNG emphasis is a differentiator.

0:25:16.280 --> 0:25:16.800
<v Speaker 3>For sure.

0:25:17.359 --> 0:25:20.639
<v Speaker 8>They have a much bigger equipment business than either SLB

0:25:21.359 --> 0:25:25.040
<v Speaker 8>or Halliburton does, and so it's natural folks to focus

0:25:24.800 --> 0:25:28.720
<v Speaker 8>on that specifically. And some of the weakness and demand

0:25:28.760 --> 0:25:30.840
<v Speaker 8>out of Europe maybe is weighing on that story a

0:25:30.840 --> 0:25:34.120
<v Speaker 8>little bit, but it's still a very strong business for them.

0:25:34.240 --> 0:25:37.920
<v Speaker 2>That's Bloomberg Intelligence senior Industrial Services analyst Scott Levine talking

0:25:38.400 --> 0:25:41.320
<v Speaker 2>outlook for oil. Following up on our conversation with Baker

0:25:41.359 --> 0:25:44.400
<v Speaker 2>Hughes Chairman, president and CEO, Lorenzo Simonelli.

0:25:44.600 --> 0:25:45.960
<v Speaker 3>Coming up on the program, We're going to get the

0:25:45.960 --> 0:25:48.960
<v Speaker 3>outlook on the cruise industry and our award shows Fading

0:25:49.119 --> 0:25:49.920
<v Speaker 3>from the Spotlight.

0:25:50.200 --> 0:25:53.080
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to Bloomberg Intelligence on Bloomberg Radio providing in

0:25:53.080 --> 0:25:55.280
<v Speaker 2>depth research and data on two thousand companies and one

0:25:55.359 --> 0:25:58.400
<v Speaker 2>hundred and thirty industries. You can access Bloomberg Intelligence via

0:25:58.480 --> 0:25:59.800
<v Speaker 2>b I go on the terminal.

0:26:00.000 --> 0:26:02.760
<v Speaker 3>I'm Paul Sweeney and a Malex Steel and this is Bloomberg.

0:26:08.680 --> 0:26:12.840
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us Saturdays

0:26:12.840 --> 0:26:16.359
<v Speaker 1>at noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot com, the iHeartRadio app

0:26:16.400 --> 0:26:19.320
<v Speaker 1>and the Bloomberg Business app, or listen on demand wherever

0:26:19.359 --> 0:26:20.600
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts.

0:26:23.080 --> 0:26:25.960
<v Speaker 2>Royal Caribbeans Icon of the Seas embarks on its first

0:26:26.000 --> 0:26:28.520
<v Speaker 2>official voyage this weekend and the journey is short to

0:26:28.560 --> 0:26:29.200
<v Speaker 2>make ways.

0:26:29.000 --> 0:26:32.040
<v Speaker 3>Oh nice one. Bloomberg Intelligence Senior credit analyst Jody Lourie

0:26:32.040 --> 0:26:34.439
<v Speaker 3>covers a leisure sector and we spoke with her about it,

0:26:34.440 --> 0:26:36.960
<v Speaker 3>her sneak peek at the world's largest cruise ship, as

0:26:37.000 --> 0:26:38.919
<v Speaker 3>well as what to expect from the cruising business in

0:26:38.920 --> 0:26:39.720
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty four.

0:26:39.960 --> 0:26:42.680
<v Speaker 9>So when you think of a cruise, it's your standard

0:26:42.680 --> 0:26:46.440
<v Speaker 9>cruise is you have just rooms on the outside right,

0:26:46.520 --> 0:26:48.800
<v Speaker 9>the balcony rooms that you can see the oceans. Then

0:26:48.800 --> 0:26:51.280
<v Speaker 9>you have the internal rooms with no windows, and so

0:26:51.320 --> 0:26:53.639
<v Speaker 9>you just have two rows of that of those sets

0:26:53.680 --> 0:26:55.280
<v Speaker 9>and then you have a bunch of floors that have

0:26:55.359 --> 0:26:59.400
<v Speaker 9>things like dining hall experiences that are main big dining room.

0:26:59.680 --> 0:27:00.960
<v Speaker 9>Then you have shows, right.

0:27:00.880 --> 0:27:02.880
<v Speaker 2>So this is Royal Caribbean owns Icon of the.

0:27:02.800 --> 0:27:04.920
<v Speaker 9>Seas, right, So Royal Caribbean owns Icon on the Seas.

0:27:05.000 --> 0:27:06.959
<v Speaker 2>Talk to us about the cruise business. You covered from

0:27:07.000 --> 0:27:09.960
<v Speaker 2>the credit side for Bloomberg Intelligence. Are these good credits?

0:27:10.240 --> 0:27:13.520
<v Speaker 9>These credits have been a very interesting set to cover.

0:27:13.920 --> 0:27:16.600
<v Speaker 9>You think about the pandemic and they were sort of

0:27:16.600 --> 0:27:19.320
<v Speaker 9>written off for dead yep. Now they've had this massive turnaround.

0:27:19.320 --> 0:27:21.639
<v Speaker 9>The momentum around them has been pretty palpable, and I

0:27:21.640 --> 0:27:23.280
<v Speaker 9>think the Icon of the Seas, the reason why it's

0:27:23.320 --> 0:27:27.320
<v Speaker 9>so important is that the narrative around it speaks to

0:27:27.440 --> 0:27:30.159
<v Speaker 9>this rebirth in the cruise market that we've been seeing.

0:27:30.480 --> 0:27:33.440
<v Speaker 9>These companies have been generating cash flow, they've been repaying debt,

0:27:33.480 --> 0:27:36.359
<v Speaker 9>they've been setting their sits on investment grade and have

0:27:36.400 --> 0:27:40.080
<v Speaker 9>been targeting it as much as they can. They're really

0:27:40.119 --> 0:27:41.840
<v Speaker 9>trying to bring down their debt loads. I mean, you're

0:27:41.880 --> 0:27:45.320
<v Speaker 9>talking Carnival's thirty six billion now down to thirty billion,

0:27:45.640 --> 0:27:47.600
<v Speaker 9>and it's going far farther down.

0:27:47.800 --> 0:27:49.760
<v Speaker 3>So I appreciate that Paul wants to make this about

0:27:49.800 --> 0:27:51.680
<v Speaker 3>finance and stuff because that's what we do. But I

0:27:51.760 --> 0:27:54.520
<v Speaker 3>want to go back to what it looks like. So okay,

0:27:54.520 --> 0:27:58.240
<v Speaker 3>so you laid out sort of what cruise ships normally are, right,

0:27:58.320 --> 0:28:00.080
<v Speaker 3>So then why is icon of the Seas different? And

0:28:00.119 --> 0:28:02.440
<v Speaker 3>I'm asking really, because that's where the money's going to

0:28:02.480 --> 0:28:04.120
<v Speaker 3>come from thro that paydown debt, So like it's kind

0:28:04.119 --> 0:28:04.920
<v Speaker 3>of a market question.

0:28:05.280 --> 0:28:07.919
<v Speaker 9>It is definitely a market question. So it's the wire

0:28:07.960 --> 0:28:09.520
<v Speaker 9>people going to be willing to be one of the

0:28:09.560 --> 0:28:12.040
<v Speaker 9>seventy six hundred people on this ship in addition to

0:28:12.080 --> 0:28:15.199
<v Speaker 9>the twenty three twenty four hundred crew. Well, they have

0:28:15.280 --> 0:28:19.080
<v Speaker 9>things like six water slides. They have ginormous areas for

0:28:19.200 --> 0:28:21.280
<v Speaker 9>children as well as, of course the Kids Club for

0:28:21.320 --> 0:28:22.919
<v Speaker 9>you to just check your kids in and leave them

0:28:22.920 --> 0:28:26.080
<v Speaker 9>there for the whole day. They have different specialty restaurants

0:28:26.119 --> 0:28:29.360
<v Speaker 9>where they try to rival something like a Las Vegas casino.

0:28:29.680 --> 0:28:31.439
<v Speaker 9>The feel of it, the look of it. If you

0:28:31.440 --> 0:28:33.080
<v Speaker 9>look at it at night, which I got to see

0:28:33.080 --> 0:28:35.639
<v Speaker 9>at the night before I drove by it, it looks

0:28:35.640 --> 0:28:37.600
<v Speaker 9>like it's lit up like your Vegas. It's like Vegas

0:28:37.640 --> 0:28:39.200
<v Speaker 9>on water, And I think that's what they're trying to

0:28:39.200 --> 0:28:41.120
<v Speaker 9>compete with. And I do know for a fact that

0:28:41.280 --> 0:28:43.880
<v Speaker 9>you know, we actually got to sit down with management

0:28:44.000 --> 0:28:47.800
<v Speaker 9>a month ago at the Celebrity Ascent naming and they.

0:28:47.680 --> 0:28:51.960
<v Speaker 3>Be Celebrity naming. What now what celebrity a scent?

0:28:52.120 --> 0:28:54.720
<v Speaker 9>So Celebrity is one of Royal Caribbean's cruise lines, right,

0:28:54.720 --> 0:28:57.680
<v Speaker 9>So they have Celebrity and they have Royal Caribbean. The

0:28:57.720 --> 0:28:59.880
<v Speaker 9>Ascent is their newest ship. It's one of their Edge

0:29:00.240 --> 0:29:03.840
<v Speaker 9>series and they had a naming so all ships have

0:29:03.960 --> 0:29:06.959
<v Speaker 9>this big naming ceremony where they break the bottle of champagne.

0:29:07.440 --> 0:29:10.040
<v Speaker 9>They have a godmother or godfather of the ship and

0:29:10.280 --> 0:29:12.120
<v Speaker 9>they have this whole big ceremony and it's a big party.

0:29:12.480 --> 0:29:15.200
<v Speaker 9>So they invited us finance folks on there as well,

0:29:15.240 --> 0:29:17.080
<v Speaker 9>and we got done with management and it was before

0:29:17.080 --> 0:29:19.520
<v Speaker 9>they were in their quiet period. They basically told us

0:29:19.600 --> 0:29:22.000
<v Speaker 9>that they don't see the other cruise lines as competition.

0:29:22.040 --> 0:29:24.880
<v Speaker 9>What they see is competition is on land vacations.

0:29:24.920 --> 0:29:25.479
<v Speaker 5>It's interesting.

0:29:25.800 --> 0:29:29.720
<v Speaker 9>So your casinos, your theme parks, that's where they see

0:29:29.760 --> 0:29:32.800
<v Speaker 9>them taking share or that's where they see people convincing

0:29:32.840 --> 0:29:35.240
<v Speaker 9>people to go elsewhere, not to the hotels. And the

0:29:35.280 --> 0:29:38.560
<v Speaker 9>casinos and the theme parks, but on the cruise ship entirely.

0:29:39.080 --> 0:29:41.600
<v Speaker 2>What are the cruise companies telling me about businesses? Revenge

0:29:41.640 --> 0:29:43.880
<v Speaker 2>travel over Hou's business in twenty four.

0:29:44.000 --> 0:29:46.480
<v Speaker 9>So more so than what management is saying. We actually

0:29:46.520 --> 0:29:49.840
<v Speaker 9>ran a survey that we did. The results quite a

0:29:49.840 --> 0:29:52.120
<v Speaker 9>substantial number of people want to travel and want to

0:29:52.120 --> 0:29:54.880
<v Speaker 9>spend more when they travel this year. So even though

0:29:55.000 --> 0:29:58.120
<v Speaker 9>revenge travel as they call it, post pandemic revenge travel,

0:29:58.120 --> 0:29:59.720
<v Speaker 9>that's the people who are cooped up inside want to

0:29:59.720 --> 0:30:01.880
<v Speaker 9>go play, don't care how much they spend, even though

0:30:01.920 --> 0:30:03.640
<v Speaker 9>that might be fading, and a lot of companies have

0:30:03.720 --> 0:30:07.160
<v Speaker 9>indicated that. At the same time, the conversation around people

0:30:07.240 --> 0:30:10.240
<v Speaker 9>spending on experiences is still very much there. Whether that

0:30:10.320 --> 0:30:12.240
<v Speaker 9>holds up into the end of the year as we

0:30:12.280 --> 0:30:14.520
<v Speaker 9>see what the FED does, as we see all the

0:30:14.520 --> 0:30:17.200
<v Speaker 9>different sort of economic points and pain points come out,

0:30:17.920 --> 0:30:20.080
<v Speaker 9>I think it remains to be seen. But we are

0:30:20.120 --> 0:30:23.680
<v Speaker 9>seeing that people are prioritizing experiences over stuff and they

0:30:23.720 --> 0:30:26.840
<v Speaker 9>continue to do so. And the way that the cruise

0:30:26.880 --> 0:30:31.320
<v Speaker 9>lines benefit is that they get to encourage people to

0:30:31.320 --> 0:30:34.120
<v Speaker 9>spend on onboard spending, so all the add on features,

0:30:34.760 --> 0:30:38.040
<v Speaker 9>so you go to their perfect day Coco Kae Island.

0:30:38.240 --> 0:30:40.520
<v Speaker 9>Guess what you want? A cabana and no other fifteen

0:30:40.560 --> 0:30:41.920
<v Speaker 9>hundred two thousand dollars for the day.

0:30:42.920 --> 0:30:45.320
<v Speaker 2>All right, Speaking of this research, you can go to

0:30:45.600 --> 0:30:49.320
<v Speaker 2>you can just get Jody Louri's bio if you're sitting

0:30:49.320 --> 0:30:51.480
<v Speaker 2>in front of a terminal and put a buyo up

0:30:51.480 --> 0:30:53.240
<v Speaker 2>there and the list all her research and that's the

0:30:53.240 --> 0:30:56.640
<v Speaker 2>top research notice point published today focus on cruising in

0:30:56.680 --> 0:30:58.920
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty four BI survey. So check that out.

0:30:59.080 --> 0:31:01.320
<v Speaker 3>I'm still were well, here's the thing.

0:31:01.480 --> 0:31:03.120
<v Speaker 2>We went down to rub but we went to a resort.

0:31:03.720 --> 0:31:06.960
<v Speaker 2>They give you the little bracelet. Yeah, oh man, that's

0:31:07.000 --> 0:31:09.440
<v Speaker 2>your key to your room. You want to buy anything,

0:31:09.480 --> 0:31:10.120
<v Speaker 2>you just go bank.

0:31:11.040 --> 0:31:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Wow.

0:31:11.360 --> 0:31:13.800
<v Speaker 2>They make it so easy and you know you're.

0:31:13.680 --> 0:31:15.320
<v Speaker 3>Doing it, and all of a sudden you're paying. You're like, wait,

0:31:15.360 --> 0:31:16.040
<v Speaker 3>what this was all?

0:31:16.320 --> 0:31:19.120
<v Speaker 2>That's why this year we went to an all inclusive.

0:31:19.360 --> 0:31:20.320
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, oh that was the way.

0:31:20.520 --> 0:31:23.520
<v Speaker 3>Aren't there also addams for all inclusives too, Like all inclusive,

0:31:23.520 --> 0:31:25.440
<v Speaker 3>but this super fancy restaurant isn't included.

0:31:25.520 --> 0:31:27.040
<v Speaker 2>Now, I mean, if you want to buy like a

0:31:27.040 --> 0:31:29.800
<v Speaker 2>bottle wine, that was extra, but I should have done

0:31:29.800 --> 0:31:32.680
<v Speaker 2>that one I had four kids. Because you check out

0:31:32.680 --> 0:31:35.040
<v Speaker 2>every resort and your bill is like fifty pages.

0:31:35.360 --> 0:31:38.160
<v Speaker 9>I mean, we're seeing that Marriott, we're seeing four seasons.

0:31:38.160 --> 0:31:40.720
<v Speaker 9>They're going into the smaller vessel ships. We're seeing that

0:31:40.800 --> 0:31:43.680
<v Speaker 9>people who used to like Crystal, which was the high

0:31:43.800 --> 0:31:45.760
<v Speaker 9>end and it went through a little bit of a restructuring,

0:31:46.400 --> 0:31:50.120
<v Speaker 9>just a little bit that people are then going over

0:31:50.200 --> 0:31:52.800
<v Speaker 9>to these higher end ships, and they are also going

0:31:52.840 --> 0:31:55.200
<v Speaker 9>to the Norwegian higher end line. So Norwegian has a

0:31:55.200 --> 0:31:58.000
<v Speaker 9>few higher end lines, Carnival has a few higher end lines.

0:31:58.040 --> 0:32:01.360
<v Speaker 9>So people are moving to their from these other ships.

0:32:01.400 --> 0:32:04.160
<v Speaker 9>Because they are smaller vessel, they are much more manageable.

0:32:04.520 --> 0:32:06.880
<v Speaker 9>You're you're viewing it both as a way to lounge

0:32:06.920 --> 0:32:09.000
<v Speaker 9>but as a way to get to a room.

0:32:09.040 --> 0:32:10.640
<v Speaker 3>But what kind of like this reminds me of is

0:32:10.680 --> 0:32:12.640
<v Speaker 3>what people are doing with the airlines. Right, no one

0:32:12.680 --> 0:32:14.800
<v Speaker 3>wants basic economy. They all want to trade up. So

0:32:14.840 --> 0:32:16.840
<v Speaker 3>everyone goes to business class, and then all people who

0:32:16.880 --> 0:32:18.560
<v Speaker 3>normally fly business class, like get me out of here,

0:32:18.600 --> 0:32:20.160
<v Speaker 3>they go to first class, where they go to private

0:32:20.240 --> 0:32:21.560
<v Speaker 3>Like I feel like it's it's just sort of the

0:32:21.640 --> 0:32:23.200
<v Speaker 3>up tier at the end of all everything.

0:32:23.240 --> 0:32:25.000
<v Speaker 9>So everybody wants to feel like a VIP.

0:32:25.440 --> 0:32:26.800
<v Speaker 3>That's that we're not VIP.

0:32:27.120 --> 0:32:29.080
<v Speaker 9>I know, that's the model. I mean you look at

0:32:29.120 --> 0:32:31.160
<v Speaker 9>all the rooms. I mean they have the suite room,

0:32:31.200 --> 0:32:33.120
<v Speaker 9>and they have this sweet room, and the presidential suite,

0:32:33.200 --> 0:32:35.000
<v Speaker 9>and then this suite and then that suite, and that's

0:32:35.040 --> 0:32:37.560
<v Speaker 9>all designed to make everybody feel special and feel like

0:32:37.560 --> 0:32:40.440
<v Speaker 9>they're a VIP, and also to make it instagrammable, because

0:32:40.920 --> 0:32:41.640
<v Speaker 9>that's the age where.

0:32:41.600 --> 0:32:43.880
<v Speaker 2>Jordy was posting on social and she had a lovely

0:32:43.960 --> 0:32:45.400
<v Speaker 2>room with a lovely view.

0:32:45.400 --> 0:32:47.560
<v Speaker 9>That it was great fe I mean, any view of

0:32:47.560 --> 0:32:48.520
<v Speaker 9>the water is a great view.

0:32:48.600 --> 0:32:50.880
<v Speaker 3>So just to end for a moment on finance stuff,

0:32:51.760 --> 0:32:53.760
<v Speaker 3>would you like any of these credits? Like what's your

0:32:53.760 --> 0:32:55.200
<v Speaker 3>favorite play?

0:32:55.320 --> 0:32:57.560
<v Speaker 9>So I do think that the cruise lines in general

0:32:57.760 --> 0:33:00.840
<v Speaker 9>still have some room to run as compared to other

0:33:00.920 --> 0:33:03.120
<v Speaker 9>parts of leisure. I think that other parts of leisure,

0:33:03.160 --> 0:33:05.840
<v Speaker 9>it's really more of a company by company's story. So

0:33:05.880 --> 0:33:08.800
<v Speaker 9>something like a SeaWorld has been repaying debt, they've been

0:33:08.800 --> 0:33:12.560
<v Speaker 9>restructuring their capital structure and it's been very positive for

0:33:12.600 --> 0:33:15.600
<v Speaker 9>them in that sense. But from a momentum in terms

0:33:15.640 --> 0:33:18.640
<v Speaker 9>of travel, that top line isn't necessarily going to grow

0:33:18.680 --> 0:33:21.120
<v Speaker 9>as much. We're still seeing that the cruise lines are

0:33:21.280 --> 0:33:24.800
<v Speaker 9>benefiting from that booking. Similarly, we're seeing a mixed result

0:33:24.920 --> 0:33:27.560
<v Speaker 9>in the hotel space. So you have the Marryouts of

0:33:27.560 --> 0:33:29.880
<v Speaker 9>the world, you have the Hiltons of the world. Those

0:33:29.960 --> 0:33:33.440
<v Speaker 9>companies have been improving from a growth standpoint and have

0:33:33.520 --> 0:33:35.680
<v Speaker 9>been focusing on other parts of the market. But you

0:33:35.680 --> 0:33:37.800
<v Speaker 9>have something like a Choice that's in a hostile takeover

0:33:37.880 --> 0:33:40.320
<v Speaker 9>with Windham and so that kind of throws it out

0:33:40.320 --> 0:33:42.040
<v Speaker 9>the water and you say, Okay, we don't really know

0:33:42.080 --> 0:33:43.240
<v Speaker 9>what we're going to do with this, but this is

0:33:43.240 --> 0:33:47.120
<v Speaker 9>a company that is not necessarily in good standing from

0:33:47.120 --> 0:33:48.200
<v Speaker 9>a credit quality standpoint.

0:33:48.240 --> 0:33:50.800
<v Speaker 3>That was Bloomberg Intelligence and your credit endless, Jody Lori.

0:33:51.240 --> 0:33:54.479
<v Speaker 2>Let's turn out to entertainment, where waning audience numbers are

0:33:54.520 --> 0:33:57.240
<v Speaker 2>causing big concern for ward shows.

0:33:56.960 --> 0:33:57.560
<v Speaker 1>Like the Oscars.

0:33:57.640 --> 0:34:00.440
<v Speaker 3>We spoke with Bloomberg Opinion columns Bobby Ghosh about viewers

0:34:00.480 --> 0:34:02.680
<v Speaker 3>are less inclined to watch a three and a half

0:34:02.760 --> 0:34:04.240
<v Speaker 3>hour TV extravaganza.

0:34:04.400 --> 0:34:08.440
<v Speaker 4>So you know, all the award shows, Oscars, Emmy's Golden Globes,

0:34:08.680 --> 0:34:13.640
<v Speaker 4>the audiences have been dropping precipitously over the past decade,

0:34:13.640 --> 0:34:15.759
<v Speaker 4>It used to be that an Oscar night would be

0:34:15.840 --> 0:34:19.399
<v Speaker 4>forty million viewers, and then it became about thirties. Now

0:34:19.400 --> 0:34:21.800
<v Speaker 4>it's down to you know, if they get ten twelve,

0:34:21.800 --> 0:34:24.080
<v Speaker 4>then they're lucky. Last year there was a little bit

0:34:24.080 --> 0:34:26.520
<v Speaker 4>of an uptick. I think a lot of people sort

0:34:26.520 --> 0:34:28.200
<v Speaker 4>of basically dialed in to see if there'd be a

0:34:28.200 --> 0:34:31.640
<v Speaker 4>repeater of Will Smith's slap on Chris Rock. There wasn't

0:34:31.840 --> 0:34:36.080
<v Speaker 4>a slap This year. Ironically, the nominations are going to

0:34:36.080 --> 0:34:37.880
<v Speaker 4>get a lot of buzz for the reasons we've just

0:34:37.920 --> 0:34:42.040
<v Speaker 4>been talking about. Because Margot Robbie gets snubbed, because Greta

0:34:42.080 --> 0:34:44.240
<v Speaker 4>Gervik gets snobbed. There'll be a lot of buzz around

0:34:44.239 --> 0:34:48.040
<v Speaker 4>the nominations, but for those exact same reasons. I suspect

0:34:48.120 --> 0:34:51.280
<v Speaker 4>few people will watch the actual oscars. It's too long,

0:34:51.840 --> 0:34:56.440
<v Speaker 4>it's you know, they're just too much sort of pomp

0:34:56.480 --> 0:34:59.919
<v Speaker 4>and circumstances, very little actual content, and most people will

0:35:00.120 --> 0:35:04.120
<v Speaker 4>will consume the highlights on YouTube and on TikTok on.

0:35:04.960 --> 0:35:07.520
<v Speaker 2>That's not what the ABC Television network wants. They hear

0:35:07.800 --> 0:35:11.120
<v Speaker 2>that means because they I mean that's historically these events

0:35:11.160 --> 0:35:14.839
<v Speaker 2>which the CEO of former CEO of CBS would call

0:35:15.000 --> 0:35:19.400
<v Speaker 2>oh wow, events, that's what brings in huge advertising dollars.

0:35:19.440 --> 0:35:23.120
<v Speaker 2>So well, that's just another emblematic of the overall issue

0:35:23.160 --> 0:35:24.720
<v Speaker 2>of TV cord cutting.

0:35:24.719 --> 0:35:27.160
<v Speaker 4>And so yeah, they'll sell out the ads. They sold

0:35:27.160 --> 0:35:29.040
<v Speaker 4>out the ads the last time as well, last year

0:35:29.080 --> 0:35:31.640
<v Speaker 4>as well, but at a lower rate. So that's something

0:35:31.640 --> 0:35:34.160
<v Speaker 4>that they need to worry about. If they'll you know,

0:35:34.520 --> 0:35:37.960
<v Speaker 4>sufficient numbers of people will tune in that advertisers will

0:35:37.960 --> 0:35:42.719
<v Speaker 4>still remain interested in the event, but for progressively or

0:35:42.920 --> 0:35:44.560
<v Speaker 4>you know, smaller and smaller amounts of money.

0:35:44.600 --> 0:35:47.000
<v Speaker 2>Here goes this. This is the sales pitch that broadcast

0:35:47.040 --> 0:35:49.400
<v Speaker 2>and cable television have been making the Madison Avenue for

0:35:49.440 --> 0:35:51.799
<v Speaker 2>thirty years. Yeah, okay, here's the pitch. Right, I'm going

0:35:51.840 --> 0:35:53.920
<v Speaker 2>to give you no inferior product what I gave you

0:35:54.000 --> 0:35:55.439
<v Speaker 2>last year. I'm gonna charge you more.

0:35:56.040 --> 0:35:57.160
<v Speaker 3>That's not going this way.

0:35:57.200 --> 0:35:58.960
<v Speaker 2>And it works every single year.

0:35:59.239 --> 0:36:01.560
<v Speaker 3>So they're charge more for the space right now.

0:36:01.400 --> 0:36:03.319
<v Speaker 2>Every year up until the last couple of years when

0:36:03.360 --> 0:36:06.239
<v Speaker 2>court cutting became so bad. But broadcasting cable television, which

0:36:06.239 --> 0:36:08.120
<v Speaker 2>is yeah, I know my ratings are down because there's

0:36:08.120 --> 0:36:10.360
<v Speaker 2>five hundred and more channels, but still I have the

0:36:10.360 --> 0:36:13.120
<v Speaker 2>biggest audience at CBS. Yes, it's half of what it

0:36:13.160 --> 0:36:14.919
<v Speaker 2>was ten years ago, but it's still bigger than anything

0:36:14.920 --> 0:36:16.480
<v Speaker 2>else out there. Oh by the way, for that, I'm

0:36:16.480 --> 0:36:19.680
<v Speaker 2>gonna charge another five six seventy percent. And that worked forever.

0:36:20.239 --> 0:36:21.400
<v Speaker 2>Now the issue is, I.

0:36:21.360 --> 0:36:23.080
<v Speaker 4>Don't think that can be sustainedful very well.

0:36:23.160 --> 0:36:24.000
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, I don't know.

0:36:24.120 --> 0:36:26.040
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think again. You know, unless you're.

0:36:25.960 --> 0:36:27.600
<v Speaker 2>The super Bowl. If you're the super Bowl, you can go.

0:36:28.360 --> 0:36:32.960
<v Speaker 4>This is a different category. Yeah, But you know, sports,

0:36:33.000 --> 0:36:35.040
<v Speaker 4>if you're a fan, you don't want to just watch

0:36:35.040 --> 0:36:37.759
<v Speaker 4>the highlights. You want to watch the live performance. But

0:36:37.880 --> 0:36:41.040
<v Speaker 4>with Oscars, with any award show, more and more people

0:36:41.080 --> 0:36:43.560
<v Speaker 4>are quite happy just to see the highlights immediately after

0:36:43.600 --> 0:36:45.400
<v Speaker 4>the award is announced. They don't want to watch the

0:36:45.440 --> 0:36:49.960
<v Speaker 4>whole awkward moments, the awkward moments, the songs, the skits.

0:36:50.360 --> 0:36:52.400
<v Speaker 4>You know, it seems like too much of them.

0:36:52.360 --> 0:36:54.920
<v Speaker 2>Used to be that used to be must watch it really,

0:36:54.960 --> 0:36:56.960
<v Speaker 2>I know it does that. John Tucker's the whole World's

0:36:56.960 --> 0:36:57.480
<v Speaker 2>coming to an end.

0:36:57.680 --> 0:36:59.960
<v Speaker 3>I would have oscar parties. Literally, we'd like do both.

0:37:00.040 --> 0:37:02.040
<v Speaker 3>We put in money. We like people walk home with

0:37:02.080 --> 0:37:03.640
<v Speaker 3>a couple hundred bucks, like it was it was like,

0:37:04.520 --> 0:37:07.520
<v Speaker 3>I guess you can the people in my home. Sure,

0:37:07.840 --> 0:37:11.560
<v Speaker 3>I mean, oh, like in the reality of the maybe maybe.

0:37:12.120 --> 0:37:14.279
<v Speaker 3>But but what I also wonder too is do you

0:37:14.320 --> 0:37:16.480
<v Speaker 3>think that these kind of live events will go the

0:37:16.640 --> 0:37:20.000
<v Speaker 3>way of sports in different ways of viewing it like

0:37:20.040 --> 0:37:24.000
<v Speaker 3>we saw WW and Netflix for example, Like would Paramount

0:37:24.040 --> 0:37:27.000
<v Speaker 3>be like, hey, let's just air it streaming and save

0:37:27.040 --> 0:37:27.879
<v Speaker 3>something like that thing?

0:37:28.239 --> 0:37:31.160
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think you probably if the audience continues to shrink,

0:37:31.160 --> 0:37:33.800
<v Speaker 4>they'll have to find new ways of making it relevant.

0:37:34.000 --> 0:37:38.120
<v Speaker 4>You know. In time, I think you'll see the duration

0:37:38.239 --> 0:37:39.880
<v Speaker 4>of its shrink. I don't think a three and a

0:37:39.920 --> 0:37:43.440
<v Speaker 4>half hour program, which invariably goes closer to four hours,

0:37:43.560 --> 0:37:46.399
<v Speaker 4>I don't think that's sustainable anymore. This year, they're bringing

0:37:46.440 --> 0:37:49.239
<v Speaker 4>it forward. They're starting broadcast in an hour early because

0:37:49.280 --> 0:37:53.239
<v Speaker 4>they're conscious that in that last hour past bedtime in

0:37:53.280 --> 0:37:54.880
<v Speaker 4>the East Coast, a lot of people the next day

0:37:54.920 --> 0:37:56.600
<v Speaker 4>is a school day, lots of people just switch off,

0:37:56.800 --> 0:37:58.640
<v Speaker 4>and that's a real problem for them. So they're bringing

0:37:58.680 --> 0:38:01.200
<v Speaker 4>it forward to try and see can sort of juice

0:38:01.239 --> 0:38:04.520
<v Speaker 4>the audience that way. I think you'll probably see certain

0:38:04.520 --> 0:38:08.359
<v Speaker 4>amount of stunt casting in the in the people who

0:38:08.360 --> 0:38:10.759
<v Speaker 4>are host to presenters that we've seen that happen in

0:38:10.800 --> 0:38:13.720
<v Speaker 4>the in the Olympics, for instance. You know, Olympic audiences

0:38:13.760 --> 0:38:16.600
<v Speaker 4>have been down. NBC has been bringing in people like

0:38:16.640 --> 0:38:21.960
<v Speaker 4>Snoop Dogg right to try and get audiences interested. I say, okay,

0:38:22.200 --> 0:38:25.000
<v Speaker 4>let's have a let's have a switch and get some

0:38:25.080 --> 0:38:28.480
<v Speaker 4>Olympic performers to present the oscars. I'll watch them on bios.

0:38:28.680 --> 0:38:30.040
<v Speaker 7>ABC doesn't totally.

0:38:30.080 --> 0:38:32.279
<v Speaker 2>ABC doesn't have the rights of the Olympics, that's true,

0:38:32.280 --> 0:38:34.320
<v Speaker 2>but you can bring an athlete in. So yeah, exactly,

0:38:34.360 --> 0:38:36.640
<v Speaker 2>Well that's the good thing. I mean, bringing in athletes

0:38:36.800 --> 0:38:38.640
<v Speaker 2>to just some stunt hosting.

0:38:39.080 --> 0:38:39.239
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:38:39.280 --> 0:38:42.320
<v Speaker 4>I think you'll see progressively more and more desperate attempts

0:38:42.360 --> 0:38:44.200
<v Speaker 4>to try and hold on to that audience. But I

0:38:44.200 --> 0:38:45.440
<v Speaker 4>think that ship has said O right.

0:38:45.440 --> 0:38:47.480
<v Speaker 3>Thanks to Bloomberg Opinion columnist Bobby.

0:38:47.200 --> 0:38:50.560
<v Speaker 2>Goesch, that's this week's edition of Bloomberg Intelligence on Bloomberg Radio,

0:38:50.680 --> 0:38:53.320
<v Speaker 2>providing in depth research and data on two thousand companies

0:38:53.320 --> 0:38:54.680
<v Speaker 2>and one hundred and thirty industries.

0:38:54.960 --> 0:38:57.920
<v Speaker 3>And remember, you can access Bloomberg Intelligence through b I

0:38:58.000 --> 0:39:00.880
<v Speaker 3>go on the terminal. I'm Alex Steel, Paul Sweeney, and

0:39:01.000 --> 0:39:04.800
<v Speaker 3>this is Bloomberg, m