WEBVTT - Ep39 rebroadcast  "What is the future of AI relationships?"

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:02.160
<v Speaker 1>Hi, this is David Eagleman. I want to wish you

0:00:02.200 --> 0:00:05.000
<v Speaker 1>a very happy holidays. We're going to take a break

0:00:05.040 --> 0:00:06.520
<v Speaker 1>for a couple of weeks, and then we're back in

0:00:06.600 --> 0:00:12.760
<v Speaker 1>January with new episodes on emotion, intelligence, time perception, smell

0:00:12.840 --> 0:00:16.639
<v Speaker 1>and taste, brain, computer interfaces, and much more. In the meantime,

0:00:16.680 --> 0:00:19.080
<v Speaker 1>we're going to replay one of our favorite episodes from

0:00:19.120 --> 0:00:21.520
<v Speaker 1>the past year, and I'll look forward to seeing you

0:00:21.560 --> 0:00:32.480
<v Speaker 1>in January. What is the future of AI relationships? Could

0:00:32.520 --> 0:00:35.800
<v Speaker 1>it be the case that your relationship partner would be

0:00:35.960 --> 0:00:40.800
<v Speaker 1>more satisfied with a virtual version of you that behaves

0:00:41.320 --> 0:00:45.120
<v Speaker 1>five percent better than you do? Could you fall in

0:00:45.159 --> 0:00:48.839
<v Speaker 1>love with a bot? How does an AI bot plug

0:00:49.040 --> 0:00:52.800
<v Speaker 1>right into you our deep neural circuitry and what are

0:00:52.800 --> 0:00:55.440
<v Speaker 1>the pros and the cons of that? And what will

0:00:55.440 --> 0:00:58.400
<v Speaker 1>it mean when humans you love don't have to die

0:00:58.520 --> 0:01:06.240
<v Speaker 1>but can live on in your phone forever. Welcome to

0:01:06.280 --> 0:01:10.160
<v Speaker 1>Inner Cosmos with me David Eagleman. I'm a neuroscientist and

0:01:10.200 --> 0:01:13.640
<v Speaker 1>an author at Stanford and in these episodes I examined

0:01:13.680 --> 0:01:29.840
<v Speaker 1>the intersection of our brains and our lives. Today's episode

0:01:29.880 --> 0:01:35.959
<v Speaker 1>is about relationships. Why are our brains so wired for relationships.

0:01:36.280 --> 0:01:39.759
<v Speaker 1>Why do we want love so much? And will AI

0:01:40.480 --> 0:01:43.640
<v Speaker 1>be able to serve as a key to that lock,

0:01:44.319 --> 0:01:47.200
<v Speaker 1>and what does that mean for us as humans. So

0:01:47.280 --> 0:01:50.720
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that's becoming increasingly popular among young

0:01:50.760 --> 0:01:55.000
<v Speaker 1>men is having an AI girlfriend. You get to choose

0:01:55.120 --> 0:01:57.880
<v Speaker 1>or set up a beautiful avatar.

0:01:58.000 --> 0:02:00.720
<v Speaker 2>And what do I mean by beautiful. That's up to you.

0:02:00.720 --> 0:02:01.920
<v Speaker 2>You can choose.

0:02:01.880 --> 0:02:04.760
<v Speaker 1>Any model that you want, with any sort of features

0:02:04.760 --> 0:02:08.640
<v Speaker 1>that appeal maximally to you. But that's just what she

0:02:08.720 --> 0:02:13.160
<v Speaker 1>looks like. The important part is the conversation. You start

0:02:13.440 --> 0:02:16.600
<v Speaker 1>talking with her, and typically this is just text chat,

0:02:17.000 --> 0:02:21.000
<v Speaker 1>but the technology is evolving into the upgrade of video chat,

0:02:21.000 --> 0:02:23.960
<v Speaker 1>where you see the avatar's mouth moving while she speaks

0:02:24.000 --> 0:02:28.240
<v Speaker 1>to you. Now, typically the free or entry price gets

0:02:28.280 --> 0:02:32.160
<v Speaker 1>you an avatar friend who lives on your phone and

0:02:32.240 --> 0:02:34.240
<v Speaker 1>checks in on you and says nice things to you

0:02:34.600 --> 0:02:37.560
<v Speaker 1>and is available anytime that you want to chat.

0:02:38.000 --> 0:02:40.000
<v Speaker 2>And for a premium.

0:02:39.440 --> 0:02:44.799
<v Speaker 1>Subscription price you can upgrade to a steamier relationship, and

0:02:44.919 --> 0:02:49.000
<v Speaker 1>here she'll text suggestive photos and she'll say things that

0:02:49.040 --> 0:02:54.520
<v Speaker 1>you might only expect from pillow whispers. So the concern

0:02:54.560 --> 0:02:57.320
<v Speaker 1>that people have expressed is whether this is going to

0:02:57.520 --> 0:03:01.680
<v Speaker 1>impact the next generation of males. Now, as a side note,

0:03:01.760 --> 0:03:04.560
<v Speaker 1>let me say that I suspect this will have whatever

0:03:04.639 --> 0:03:07.880
<v Speaker 1>influence it has on both genders, on males and females,

0:03:08.240 --> 0:03:09.560
<v Speaker 1>also straight and gay.

0:03:10.000 --> 0:03:11.600
<v Speaker 2>But I do suspect that.

0:03:11.960 --> 0:03:16.880
<v Speaker 1>Males will be the majority demographic simply because males tend

0:03:17.000 --> 0:03:21.320
<v Speaker 1>to be more visually driven than females. So for the

0:03:21.360 --> 0:03:24.320
<v Speaker 1>conversation here, I'm going to talk about it the way

0:03:24.320 --> 0:03:27.840
<v Speaker 1>that it's mostly discussed in the media and in academic circles,

0:03:28.080 --> 0:03:31.959
<v Speaker 1>which is straight males getting girlfriends this way. But keep

0:03:31.960 --> 0:03:35.560
<v Speaker 1>in mind this is a more generalized issue. Now, the

0:03:35.720 --> 0:03:40.360
<v Speaker 1>question is what will this mean for all future generations?

0:03:40.840 --> 0:03:44.840
<v Speaker 1>Because within AI relationship, you don't have to go out

0:03:44.880 --> 0:03:49.160
<v Speaker 1>and confront all the difficulty of a real flesh and

0:03:49.200 --> 0:03:54.840
<v Speaker 1>blood relationship. Real relationships get snippy, people get angry.

0:03:54.960 --> 0:03:56.200
<v Speaker 2>In real relationships.

0:03:56.280 --> 0:03:59.720
<v Speaker 1>Your partner might develop a crush on someone else in

0:04:00.080 --> 0:04:03.040
<v Speaker 1>leave you or hook up with someone else and you

0:04:03.120 --> 0:04:07.080
<v Speaker 1>find out later, Or your partner might develop an illness,

0:04:07.760 --> 0:04:10.080
<v Speaker 1>or she might get a job somewhere else and have

0:04:10.160 --> 0:04:13.200
<v Speaker 1>to move and then you're stuck in a lonely long

0:04:13.240 --> 0:04:18.320
<v Speaker 1>distance relationship for years or whatever. Relationships are full of challenges,

0:04:18.800 --> 0:04:22.120
<v Speaker 1>the majority of which can get circumvented with a nice

0:04:22.200 --> 0:04:25.640
<v Speaker 1>algorithm that is just content to listen to you all

0:04:25.680 --> 0:04:29.159
<v Speaker 1>the time and remember everything you say and give you

0:04:29.320 --> 0:04:33.919
<v Speaker 1>one hundred percent attention and always be nice. So my

0:04:34.000 --> 0:04:36.960
<v Speaker 1>wife sometimes jokes with me about wanting to build the

0:04:37.680 --> 0:04:41.680
<v Speaker 1>five percent better David. She has, mostly as a joke,

0:04:41.800 --> 0:04:44.960
<v Speaker 1>talked about this issue of what if she could have

0:04:45.120 --> 0:04:49.560
<v Speaker 1>an AI avatar of me that is never distracted with work,

0:04:49.680 --> 0:04:52.839
<v Speaker 1>or never looks at my cell phone when it things

0:04:52.839 --> 0:04:55.719
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of a conversation we're having, or never

0:04:56.000 --> 0:04:58.960
<v Speaker 1>wakes up from a weird dream and has a funny morning,

0:04:59.640 --> 0:05:03.919
<v Speaker 1>or never argues over some misunderstanding that's later understood to

0:05:03.920 --> 0:05:06.800
<v Speaker 1>be stupid and meaningless. And she tells me that she

0:05:07.000 --> 0:05:11.000
<v Speaker 1>wants five percent better David to always tell her she's right,

0:05:11.120 --> 0:05:14.719
<v Speaker 1>even in those rare cases when she's wrong. The key

0:05:14.800 --> 0:05:18.120
<v Speaker 1>is that five percent better David never gets busy or

0:05:18.200 --> 0:05:23.960
<v Speaker 1>occasionally snarky or forgets some occasion. Instead, he represents all

0:05:24.440 --> 0:05:27.560
<v Speaker 1>the best of me. And I'll just note that it's

0:05:27.640 --> 0:05:30.839
<v Speaker 1>very kind of her to label this five percent better David,

0:05:31.000 --> 0:05:34.360
<v Speaker 1>because she could say like ninety percent better and she'd

0:05:34.400 --> 0:05:35.200
<v Speaker 1>be justified.

0:05:35.720 --> 0:05:35.960
<v Speaker 3>Why.

0:05:36.160 --> 0:05:40.520
<v Speaker 1>It's because we are all very imperfect in relationships. As

0:05:40.560 --> 0:05:44.640
<v Speaker 1>I've talked about on other episodes, we are each living

0:05:44.760 --> 0:05:47.920
<v Speaker 1>on our own planet in the sense that we carry

0:05:48.000 --> 0:05:52.040
<v Speaker 1>our own internal models of the world, and as much

0:05:52.040 --> 0:05:55.680
<v Speaker 1>as we work to understand one another's viewpoints and motivations

0:05:56.040 --> 0:05:57.520
<v Speaker 1>and intentions, we're.

0:05:57.400 --> 0:05:58.480
<v Speaker 2>Not always that good at it.

0:05:58.560 --> 0:06:02.280
<v Speaker 1>Because we assume that other people are seeing the world

0:06:02.640 --> 0:06:04.920
<v Speaker 1>in the same way that we do, they have the

0:06:04.960 --> 0:06:09.200
<v Speaker 1>same methods for sense making, they gather meaning in the

0:06:09.240 --> 0:06:12.080
<v Speaker 1>same way that we do, and we assume they generally

0:06:12.120 --> 0:06:16.279
<v Speaker 1>hold or should hold, the same opinions about everything that

0:06:16.360 --> 0:06:20.600
<v Speaker 1>we do. And this is because the brain is locked

0:06:20.640 --> 0:06:25.520
<v Speaker 1>in silence and darkness and has no meaningful direct access

0:06:25.560 --> 0:06:28.320
<v Speaker 1>to the outside world, and so it gathers up all

0:06:28.360 --> 0:06:32.440
<v Speaker 1>its information through its narrow windows of the senses, and

0:06:32.520 --> 0:06:37.320
<v Speaker 1>it builds its internal model from this very thin trajectory

0:06:37.360 --> 0:06:40.279
<v Speaker 1>of space and time that it walks along. And this

0:06:40.440 --> 0:06:43.800
<v Speaker 1>is why everyone is so different on the inside, and

0:06:43.880 --> 0:06:50.960
<v Speaker 1>therefore why relationships are always full of misunderstanding and often conflict.

0:06:51.720 --> 0:06:56.680
<v Speaker 1>So relationships are inherently tough. And the question is when

0:06:56.760 --> 0:06:58.880
<v Speaker 1>would it be a good thing if you could have

0:06:59.640 --> 0:07:03.960
<v Speaker 1>an artificial partner who represents all the best of what

0:07:04.040 --> 0:07:06.880
<v Speaker 1>a person can be. So a lot of people will

0:07:06.920 --> 0:07:09.840
<v Speaker 1>immediately say no to this idea, but it's worth noting

0:07:10.360 --> 0:07:13.640
<v Speaker 1>that we're all striving to be the five percent better

0:07:13.760 --> 0:07:17.320
<v Speaker 1>versions of ourselves. We don't want to be snarky or

0:07:17.400 --> 0:07:20.640
<v Speaker 1>angry or distracted when a loved one is talking to us.

0:07:20.680 --> 0:07:22.920
<v Speaker 1>It's not like we get some extra pleasure out of

0:07:22.960 --> 0:07:25.960
<v Speaker 1>doing that, and it's not like the relationship gets some

0:07:26.120 --> 0:07:31.600
<v Speaker 1>extra boost or closeness from that having happened. So presumably

0:07:31.840 --> 0:07:35.560
<v Speaker 1>this is all part of why AI relationships have become

0:07:36.120 --> 0:07:38.480
<v Speaker 1>a thing, a possibility.

0:07:37.720 --> 0:07:39.320
<v Speaker 2>That we talk about nowadays.

0:07:39.840 --> 0:07:44.400
<v Speaker 1>In Japan, many young men apparently already prefer to have

0:07:44.520 --> 0:07:50.040
<v Speaker 1>relationships with their digital assistants or avatars or holographic girlfriends

0:07:50.440 --> 0:07:55.200
<v Speaker 1>instead of dealing with the complexity of real life relationships,

0:07:55.760 --> 0:08:00.800
<v Speaker 1>and according to research, gen z is more readily redisposed

0:08:00.960 --> 0:08:06.320
<v Speaker 1>to seek out relationships with AI generated avatars first because

0:08:06.360 --> 0:08:09.560
<v Speaker 1>they're comfortable using the technology in this way compared to

0:08:09.640 --> 0:08:15.560
<v Speaker 1>previous generations, and also they're participating less often in traditional

0:08:15.560 --> 0:08:20.600
<v Speaker 1>social activities like regular family dinners or attending religious services

0:08:20.720 --> 0:08:26.360
<v Speaker 1>or playing sports and The question is, if AI relationships

0:08:26.760 --> 0:08:31.600
<v Speaker 1>were to catch on broadly, what will this mean for society?

0:08:31.680 --> 0:08:35.079
<v Speaker 1>Will kids actually stop going on dates because they can

0:08:35.160 --> 0:08:37.880
<v Speaker 1>find better relationships online?

0:08:38.800 --> 0:08:41.319
<v Speaker 2>And this is a real question because there.

0:08:41.160 --> 0:08:47.840
<v Speaker 1>Are many startups currently blossoming to create chatbot driven connections.

0:08:47.880 --> 0:08:49.360
<v Speaker 2>I'll give you one example.

0:08:49.400 --> 0:08:52.880
<v Speaker 1>There's a twenty three year old influencer with almost two

0:08:52.920 --> 0:08:56.880
<v Speaker 1>million Snapchat followers. Her name is Karen Marjorie, and earlier

0:08:56.920 --> 0:09:00.920
<v Speaker 1>this year in May, she released Karen Ai, which is

0:09:01.200 --> 0:09:05.960
<v Speaker 1>an immersive AI experience featuring videos of Margie that she

0:09:06.080 --> 0:09:10.200
<v Speaker 1>says provide a quote virtual girlfriend for those who are

0:09:10.200 --> 0:09:12.440
<v Speaker 1>willing to pony up one dollar per minute.

0:09:12.760 --> 0:09:12.960
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:09:12.960 --> 0:09:17.160
<v Speaker 1>This is what's known as a companion chatbot, and she

0:09:17.280 --> 0:09:20.720
<v Speaker 1>tweeted that quote karen Ai is the first step in

0:09:20.760 --> 0:09:23.360
<v Speaker 1>the right direction to cure loneliness.

0:09:24.080 --> 0:09:27.480
<v Speaker 2>He tweet continues. Quote. Men are told to suppress their.

0:09:27.360 --> 0:09:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Emotions and not talk about issues they're having.

0:09:30.960 --> 0:09:33.800
<v Speaker 2>I vow to fix this with karen Ai.

0:09:35.080 --> 0:09:39.359
<v Speaker 1>She says she's worked with leading psychologists to seamlessly include

0:09:39.480 --> 0:09:44.480
<v Speaker 1>the right therapies to quote undue trauma, rebuild physical and

0:09:44.520 --> 0:09:48.720
<v Speaker 1>emotional confidence, and rebuild what has been taken away by

0:09:48.760 --> 0:09:51.240
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic end quote. And by the way, as a

0:09:51.280 --> 0:09:54.240
<v Speaker 1>side note, I think AI psychologists are going to be

0:09:54.400 --> 0:09:58.400
<v Speaker 1>a truly important part of the clinical landscape by next

0:09:58.480 --> 0:10:01.240
<v Speaker 1>year because you can have a therapist that you can

0:10:01.320 --> 0:10:04.640
<v Speaker 1>talk to twenty four to seven, and the therapist never gets.

0:10:04.400 --> 0:10:05.839
<v Speaker 2>Distracted or flustered and.

0:10:05.920 --> 0:10:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Only cares about you and has a perfect memory for

0:10:10.240 --> 0:10:13.400
<v Speaker 1>everything you've ever said, which is better than anybody else

0:10:13.440 --> 0:10:17.720
<v Speaker 1>in real life. So back to AI girlfriends or boyfriends.

0:10:18.080 --> 0:10:21.760
<v Speaker 1>The same idea applies here, which is that they are

0:10:21.800 --> 0:10:25.960
<v Speaker 1>completely devoted to you and always in a good mood

0:10:26.320 --> 0:10:30.600
<v Speaker 1>and only have you in mind. So what are AI

0:10:30.679 --> 0:10:33.440
<v Speaker 1>relationships going to mean? Well, I think this is going

0:10:33.480 --> 0:10:38.040
<v Speaker 1>to be a research question that sociologists and psychologists will

0:10:38.080 --> 0:10:42.920
<v Speaker 1>study for the coming decades and centuries. The initial studies

0:10:42.920 --> 0:10:47.480
<v Speaker 1>are suggesting that people, mostly gen zers, are moving closer

0:10:47.520 --> 0:10:53.040
<v Speaker 1>to the technology to avoid the unpleasant realities of human relationships.

0:10:53.120 --> 0:10:58.079
<v Speaker 1>All the tough stuff. Is that detrimental? Well it could

0:10:58.120 --> 0:11:02.360
<v Speaker 1>be if it makes your human reas relationships harder, because

0:11:02.360 --> 0:11:05.320
<v Speaker 1>maybe every time you guys have an argument in real life,

0:11:05.400 --> 0:11:08.280
<v Speaker 1>your partner thinks, well, forget it, I'm bagging this. I'm

0:11:08.320 --> 0:11:11.800
<v Speaker 1>going back to my comfort zone. So the concern, as

0:11:11.800 --> 0:11:15.120
<v Speaker 1>you can probably guess, is that the rise of AI

0:11:15.280 --> 0:11:20.440
<v Speaker 1>driven relationships could exacerbate loneliness because they seem to be

0:11:20.520 --> 0:11:23.439
<v Speaker 1>a meal, but they provide no calories.

0:11:23.520 --> 0:11:24.880
<v Speaker 2>And I'll come back to that in a moment.

0:11:25.559 --> 0:11:30.040
<v Speaker 1>In other words, AI generated avatars could interfere with the

0:11:30.080 --> 0:11:35.080
<v Speaker 1>relationships that young people are just learning to foster, because

0:11:35.520 --> 0:11:41.400
<v Speaker 1>the AI relationship might breed dissatisfaction with flawed humans. And

0:11:41.440 --> 0:11:44.920
<v Speaker 1>this applies not only to lovers, but even to friends.

0:11:44.920 --> 0:11:48.360
<v Speaker 1>It might be easier to have AI friends who aren't

0:11:48.640 --> 0:11:50.800
<v Speaker 1>busy when you need them and can give you one

0:11:50.840 --> 0:11:54.280
<v Speaker 1>hundred percent of their attention whenever you need it. And

0:11:54.360 --> 0:11:58.560
<v Speaker 1>let me throw in a different potential problem with AI relationships,

0:11:58.679 --> 0:12:01.120
<v Speaker 1>So give me one second to take this tangent here.

0:12:01.559 --> 0:12:04.760
<v Speaker 1>I was thinking the other day about the Fermi paradox.

0:12:04.840 --> 0:12:06.120
<v Speaker 2>The Fermi paradox is.

0:12:06.720 --> 0:12:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Given the size of the observable cosmos, with over one

0:12:11.640 --> 0:12:15.120
<v Speaker 1>hundred billion galaxies, and each of them with one hundred

0:12:15.160 --> 0:12:18.280
<v Speaker 1>billion stars, and each of those surrounded by some number

0:12:18.320 --> 0:12:21.200
<v Speaker 1>of planets, what is the reason that we have not

0:12:21.440 --> 0:12:26.400
<v Speaker 1>heard from any other alien species yet? And one of

0:12:26.480 --> 0:12:30.200
<v Speaker 1>the proposals that's always been there is that maybe as

0:12:30.440 --> 0:12:36.040
<v Speaker 1>civilizations become more technically advanced, they end up killing themselves,

0:12:36.080 --> 0:12:39.839
<v Speaker 1>and this is why we haven't heard from other smart civilizations,

0:12:39.880 --> 0:12:40.600
<v Speaker 1>because they.

0:12:40.480 --> 0:12:41.800
<v Speaker 2>Are already gone.

0:12:42.520 --> 0:12:44.880
<v Speaker 1>And every time I've seen this proposal, it's always in

0:12:44.920 --> 0:12:48.520
<v Speaker 1>the form of warfare, things like nuclear bombs.

0:12:48.559 --> 0:12:50.840
<v Speaker 2>They end up wiping themselves out.

0:12:51.440 --> 0:12:55.000
<v Speaker 1>So civilizations become smart and it's not long before they disappear.

0:12:55.720 --> 0:12:59.720
<v Speaker 1>So in thinking about AI relationships, it struck me as

0:12:59.760 --> 0:13:04.359
<v Speaker 1>a possibility that if we had really, really great relationships

0:13:04.400 --> 0:13:09.040
<v Speaker 1>with avatars, perhaps that would cause the birth rate of

0:13:09.120 --> 0:13:12.440
<v Speaker 1>the species to collapse. I don't know if this has

0:13:12.480 --> 0:13:15.920
<v Speaker 1>been proposed as a possible answer to the Fermi paradox,

0:13:16.000 --> 0:13:20.560
<v Speaker 1>but maybe this should be included, not civilization's disappearing because

0:13:20.559 --> 0:13:24.120
<v Speaker 1>of bad things, but instead from having too much of

0:13:24.160 --> 0:13:28.400
<v Speaker 1>a good thing, which could fool and eventually overwrite or

0:13:28.520 --> 0:13:50.560
<v Speaker 1>mandate for reproduction. Okay, so no one knows what the

0:13:50.600 --> 0:13:54.280
<v Speaker 1>long term effects will be of these AI relationships, but

0:13:54.400 --> 0:13:58.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't actually think the situation is as dire as

0:13:58.840 --> 0:14:01.840
<v Speaker 1>some of these arguments suggest that it is. And I'll

0:14:01.840 --> 0:14:05.920
<v Speaker 1>make two arguments to this end. The first revolves around

0:14:06.360 --> 0:14:11.160
<v Speaker 1>human touch. We are deeply wired to care about touch.

0:14:11.200 --> 0:14:13.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to do a whole episode on touch in

0:14:13.160 --> 0:14:16.360
<v Speaker 1>the near future, but the bottom line is that touch

0:14:16.400 --> 0:14:19.480
<v Speaker 1>helps us to connect with others, to feel safe and secure,

0:14:19.960 --> 0:14:23.520
<v Speaker 1>to regulate our emotions. When you get touched, your brain

0:14:23.560 --> 0:14:27.520
<v Speaker 1>releases oxytocin, which is a hormone that has calming effects

0:14:27.520 --> 0:14:32.880
<v Speaker 1>and bonding effects, and oxytocin helps to reduce stress and anxiety.

0:14:32.960 --> 0:14:36.760
<v Speaker 1>It can even boost your immune system. So we need

0:14:37.280 --> 0:14:41.080
<v Speaker 1>touch to feel connected and loved, and a lack of

0:14:41.200 --> 0:14:45.720
<v Speaker 1>touch leads to loneliness and depression and anxiety. So we're

0:14:45.720 --> 0:14:49.200
<v Speaker 1>deeply programmed for touch and also things like smell, and

0:14:49.280 --> 0:14:52.840
<v Speaker 1>so it would presumably be quite lonely if all you

0:14:53.000 --> 0:14:57.320
<v Speaker 1>had was the five percent better partner on a screen

0:14:57.640 --> 0:15:01.760
<v Speaker 1>and you're just exchanging text messages or just an avatar

0:15:01.840 --> 0:15:03.840
<v Speaker 1>you can look at on your phone, or maybe even

0:15:03.840 --> 0:15:06.680
<v Speaker 1>in the near future you'll have a three D avatar

0:15:06.800 --> 0:15:09.800
<v Speaker 1>projection in your living room, but you won't have the

0:15:10.000 --> 0:15:16.680
<v Speaker 1>hand squeeze and the hug and other forms of physical intimacy. Now,

0:15:16.720 --> 0:15:20.600
<v Speaker 1>I assume people are working on AI robots that can

0:15:20.640 --> 0:15:24.480
<v Speaker 1>provide touch, even something simple like touching your shoulder or

0:15:24.600 --> 0:15:27.560
<v Speaker 1>laying a hand on your hand, and I can't imagine

0:15:27.760 --> 0:15:29.840
<v Speaker 1>that it's going to be too hard to do, and

0:15:29.880 --> 0:15:32.440
<v Speaker 1>it'll probably be not that great at first, but after

0:15:32.520 --> 0:15:35.320
<v Speaker 1>a few tech cycles you can imagine it could get

0:15:35.320 --> 0:15:39.560
<v Speaker 1>pretty good. But in any case, at the moment, if

0:15:39.600 --> 0:15:43.120
<v Speaker 1>you have a girlfriend who just lives in several square

0:15:43.160 --> 0:15:46.000
<v Speaker 1>inches in your phone screen, you're going to be missing

0:15:46.080 --> 0:15:51.360
<v Speaker 1>out on this fundamentally needed aspect of human communication that

0:15:51.400 --> 0:15:54.960
<v Speaker 1>our brains seek. So the depth to which our brains

0:15:54.960 --> 0:15:58.200
<v Speaker 1>are wired for touch suggests to me that the reach

0:15:58.320 --> 0:16:02.480
<v Speaker 1>of AI partners into our lives is going to be limited, because,

0:16:02.720 --> 0:16:07.120
<v Speaker 1>at least it's currently devised, their algorithmic reach never actually

0:16:07.320 --> 0:16:12.240
<v Speaker 1>contacts our skin, and so that will be continued to

0:16:12.320 --> 0:16:13.320
<v Speaker 1>be sought.

0:16:14.120 --> 0:16:14.440
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:16:14.600 --> 0:16:18.440
<v Speaker 1>The second point to raise about whether AI partners can

0:16:18.520 --> 0:16:21.960
<v Speaker 1>displace real human partners is that there's a sense in

0:16:22.040 --> 0:16:25.960
<v Speaker 1>which fake partners have always been around. Just look at

0:16:26.000 --> 0:16:29.200
<v Speaker 1>a book, look at a movie, look at any TV show.

0:16:29.640 --> 0:16:34.640
<v Speaker 1>You have beautiful Hollywood actors and actresses, and they have

0:16:35.000 --> 0:16:39.600
<v Speaker 1>flawless skin and perfectly quafft hair and no hair where

0:16:39.640 --> 0:16:42.640
<v Speaker 1>they shouldn't, and they have glittering white teeth. They are

0:16:42.680 --> 0:16:46.280
<v Speaker 1>the epitome of health, and they always say the right thing,

0:16:47.000 --> 0:16:51.360
<v Speaker 1>and you get to be the protagonist and enjoy experiencing

0:16:51.440 --> 0:16:55.440
<v Speaker 1>that relationship. You find the partner and lose the partner,

0:16:55.480 --> 0:16:57.960
<v Speaker 1>and then an act five you regain the relationship with

0:16:58.040 --> 0:17:03.080
<v Speaker 1>an epic kiss. This kind of fake relationship in books

0:17:03.080 --> 0:17:06.480
<v Speaker 1>and movies isn't exactly the same as an ai relationship,

0:17:06.480 --> 0:17:08.520
<v Speaker 1>but it has some similarities.

0:17:08.560 --> 0:17:10.120
<v Speaker 2>They both represent a.

0:17:10.119 --> 0:17:16.240
<v Speaker 1>Platonic ideal, a perfect relationship with someone who always says

0:17:16.320 --> 0:17:19.439
<v Speaker 1>the right thing. We never see a love interest in

0:17:19.480 --> 0:17:23.840
<v Speaker 1>the movie who is distracted or angry, or interested in

0:17:23.920 --> 0:17:26.960
<v Speaker 1>someone else, or just really busy with work, too busy

0:17:27.000 --> 0:17:30.080
<v Speaker 1>to spend time with you when you need them. You

0:17:30.200 --> 0:17:32.919
<v Speaker 1>never see a love interest in the movies who waste

0:17:32.960 --> 0:17:35.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of time taking selfies and trying to build

0:17:35.960 --> 0:17:41.359
<v Speaker 1>a meaningless reputation on TikTok. People have no meaningful foibles

0:17:41.400 --> 0:17:44.840
<v Speaker 1>in a good love story in a book or on television.

0:17:45.720 --> 0:17:46.000
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:17:46.200 --> 0:17:49.920
<v Speaker 1>I've often wondered if we, in a sense get cursed

0:17:49.960 --> 0:17:52.840
<v Speaker 1>by the fairy tales we're surrounded with when we're looking

0:17:52.880 --> 0:17:54.000
<v Speaker 1>for actual love.

0:17:54.440 --> 0:17:55.239
<v Speaker 2>But I don't know.

0:17:55.760 --> 0:17:59.720
<v Speaker 1>Perhaps those fairy tales help us past all the difficult

0:17:59.720 --> 0:18:02.720
<v Speaker 1>stuff in a relationship. They get us to ignore the

0:18:02.760 --> 0:18:07.240
<v Speaker 1>imperfect things because we believe so strongly in the possibility

0:18:07.600 --> 0:18:09.080
<v Speaker 1>of a perfect relationship.

0:18:09.320 --> 0:18:10.440
<v Speaker 2>So think about it this way.

0:18:10.560 --> 0:18:14.200
<v Speaker 1>Say you were a space alien who had never watched

0:18:14.320 --> 0:18:17.080
<v Speaker 1>or read a love story, and you had no concept

0:18:17.080 --> 0:18:19.879
<v Speaker 1>of that, and the question is, when you met someone,

0:18:19.920 --> 0:18:23.040
<v Speaker 1>would you think, Wow, They seem to have very different

0:18:23.080 --> 0:18:24.040
<v Speaker 1>opinions than I do.

0:18:24.440 --> 0:18:26.320
<v Speaker 2>They think like this, and I think like that.

0:18:26.760 --> 0:18:29.480
<v Speaker 1>And they also spend some fraction of their time getting

0:18:29.520 --> 0:18:32.040
<v Speaker 1>snippy at me or staring at their cell phone or whatever.

0:18:32.320 --> 0:18:34.119
<v Speaker 1>So there's no way this can work.

0:18:34.840 --> 0:18:35.320
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:18:35.480 --> 0:18:38.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm just speculating here, but I do wonder if seeing

0:18:38.480 --> 0:18:42.440
<v Speaker 1>lots of models of love stories gives us the tools

0:18:42.840 --> 0:18:46.080
<v Speaker 1>to view things in a more optimistic light, and that

0:18:46.480 --> 0:18:48.400
<v Speaker 1>actually gives a chance.

0:18:48.400 --> 0:18:50.040
<v Speaker 2>To make the relationship work.

0:18:50.119 --> 0:18:55.159
<v Speaker 1>In other words, it provides some aspirational glue where otherwise

0:18:55.359 --> 0:18:59.280
<v Speaker 1>things would just fall apart. Now, the counter argument, of course,

0:18:59.400 --> 0:19:03.159
<v Speaker 1>is that all these fantasies set you up with false

0:19:03.280 --> 0:19:07.280
<v Speaker 1>expectations about love and relationships, which makes it harder to

0:19:07.359 --> 0:19:11.280
<v Speaker 1>keep the relationship together once you see some degree of

0:19:11.800 --> 0:19:16.880
<v Speaker 1>realism and disenchantment sets in. In any case, even if

0:19:16.920 --> 0:19:19.640
<v Speaker 1>we do get cursed by these fairy tales in some way,

0:19:20.200 --> 0:19:25.840
<v Speaker 1>it's still the case that there's nothing new about fantasy relationships. Now,

0:19:26.160 --> 0:19:29.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe you argue this is different because instead of the

0:19:30.119 --> 0:19:33.840
<v Speaker 1>Julia Roberts movie that everyone watches, it's now something that

0:19:33.960 --> 0:19:38.359
<v Speaker 1>is bespoke just for you. It's a one on one relationship,

0:19:38.880 --> 0:19:41.719
<v Speaker 1>and maybe that's an important difference. But just keep in

0:19:41.760 --> 0:19:45.880
<v Speaker 1>mind the way that we humans enjoy literature is by

0:19:46.000 --> 0:19:50.000
<v Speaker 1>living inside the story. You are essentially having a one

0:19:50.040 --> 0:19:53.639
<v Speaker 1>on one relationship with Julia Roberts. So perhaps it's not

0:19:53.800 --> 0:19:58.000
<v Speaker 1>the privacy of the relationship, but instead, the meaningful difference

0:19:58.000 --> 0:20:00.160
<v Speaker 1>with an AI relationship.

0:20:00.240 --> 0:20:02.640
<v Speaker 2>Is the bi directional nature of it.

0:20:03.080 --> 0:20:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Instead of watching a movie where you're simply hearing other

0:20:06.640 --> 0:20:11.360
<v Speaker 1>characters say lines and Julia Roberts responds, you are now

0:20:11.400 --> 0:20:14.160
<v Speaker 1>the one coming up with the lines. You are deciding

0:20:14.280 --> 0:20:17.679
<v Speaker 1>what to say. So maybe this makes a difference. I

0:20:17.760 --> 0:20:21.400
<v Speaker 1>suspect it enhances the degree of the fantasy.

0:20:22.240 --> 0:20:25.240
<v Speaker 2>So we have yet to see whether.

0:20:25.040 --> 0:20:29.280
<v Speaker 1>AI will meaningfully replace people's pursuits of other humans because

0:20:29.640 --> 0:20:33.159
<v Speaker 1>it is touchless and smellless, and it's not clear what

0:20:33.240 --> 0:20:37.679
<v Speaker 1>the impact is of holding fantasy relationships, because we already

0:20:37.760 --> 0:20:41.439
<v Speaker 1>do that with book characters and movie stars. So this

0:20:41.520 --> 0:20:44.760
<v Speaker 1>is going to require many years of real world data

0:20:45.160 --> 0:20:48.640
<v Speaker 1>to get a real bead on the impact here. Okay, Now,

0:20:48.680 --> 0:20:51.520
<v Speaker 1>whatever you think about AI companions, I have noticed in

0:20:51.600 --> 0:20:55.159
<v Speaker 1>conversations with my friends, especially those who are married, a

0:20:55.400 --> 0:20:59.560
<v Speaker 1>question that floats quickly to the surface. Is it cheating

0:21:00.080 --> 0:21:02.840
<v Speaker 1>to have a relationship on your phone with a non

0:21:02.880 --> 0:21:06.119
<v Speaker 1>real person? And there are different levels, of course of

0:21:06.200 --> 0:21:09.320
<v Speaker 1>what an AI relationship could be. What if it's just

0:21:09.359 --> 0:21:12.840
<v Speaker 1>an app like replica that checks in with you like

0:21:12.880 --> 0:21:15.240
<v Speaker 1>a friend who cares about you, and you can just

0:21:15.640 --> 0:21:18.440
<v Speaker 1>chat innocently with it. This is the free version of

0:21:18.480 --> 0:21:21.080
<v Speaker 1>the app, Okay, so that's one level. But what if

0:21:21.119 --> 0:21:23.920
<v Speaker 1>you go in for the paid version, where the conversation

0:21:24.040 --> 0:21:27.639
<v Speaker 1>with the avatar becomes more spicy? And what if the

0:21:27.680 --> 0:21:33.280
<v Speaker 1>cartoon like avatar is highly attractive and dressed provocatively and

0:21:33.440 --> 0:21:38.000
<v Speaker 1>is extremely suggestive in what she says. So I've informally

0:21:38.040 --> 0:21:41.440
<v Speaker 1>surveyed several married friends about this, and it seems clear

0:21:41.960 --> 0:21:46.159
<v Speaker 1>that opinions are all over the spectrum. Some wives and

0:21:46.240 --> 0:21:50.480
<v Speaker 1>husbands feel fine about having their partner have an AI relationship,

0:21:50.480 --> 0:21:54.159
<v Speaker 1>on the side, and others said no way. Now, for

0:21:54.200 --> 0:21:57.359
<v Speaker 1>those who said no way, this is presumably because the

0:21:57.480 --> 0:22:01.200
<v Speaker 1>issue plugs into very deep so chetry in their brain.

0:22:01.320 --> 0:22:04.919
<v Speaker 1>It's interpreted as a threat to the relationship, and we

0:22:05.000 --> 0:22:10.200
<v Speaker 1>are hardwired to fight against that. From an evolutionary perspective,

0:22:10.240 --> 0:22:13.240
<v Speaker 1>what you want is for your mate to stick around

0:22:13.240 --> 0:22:17.679
<v Speaker 1>and provide resources and child rearing, and anything that represents

0:22:17.720 --> 0:22:21.200
<v Speaker 1>a threat to that is to be fought against. Now,

0:22:21.359 --> 0:22:24.159
<v Speaker 1>the part that seems interesting here is that an AI

0:22:24.240 --> 0:22:29.920
<v Speaker 1>avatar would not represent a direct threat in this evolutionary sense.

0:22:30.000 --> 0:22:34.560
<v Speaker 1>You can't go and impregnate or be impregnated by AI.

0:22:35.800 --> 0:22:40.760
<v Speaker 1>But nonetheless your attention might be stolen away to some degree,

0:22:40.800 --> 0:22:44.480
<v Speaker 1>possibly to a large degree, and beyond an evolutionary threat.

0:22:44.520 --> 0:22:46.840
<v Speaker 1>A big part of what people get out of a

0:22:46.880 --> 0:22:51.000
<v Speaker 1>relationship is the love and the attention that we all crave.

0:22:51.760 --> 0:22:54.720
<v Speaker 1>So many people feel that they just don't want the

0:22:54.840 --> 0:22:57.840
<v Speaker 1>AI bought to steal away even a fraction of that.

0:22:58.280 --> 0:23:00.959
<v Speaker 1>A partner only has so much much love and attention

0:23:01.080 --> 0:23:03.800
<v Speaker 1>to give in a day, and you don't want half

0:23:03.840 --> 0:23:07.520
<v Speaker 1>of it getting siphoned off to someone or something else.

0:23:08.440 --> 0:23:13.080
<v Speaker 1>This shares some similarities to the situation of a person

0:23:13.200 --> 0:23:16.320
<v Speaker 1>having an X that they still talk with, and if

0:23:16.359 --> 0:23:19.960
<v Speaker 1>a person talks very intimately with their ex, a spouse

0:23:20.040 --> 0:23:23.720
<v Speaker 1>might feel like she or he doesn't really love that. Now,

0:23:23.760 --> 0:23:26.399
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to the X, if you were making

0:23:26.440 --> 0:23:30.520
<v Speaker 1>the evolutionary argument, you could argue that the fear is

0:23:30.560 --> 0:23:33.720
<v Speaker 1>that on a lonely night, in the middle of a conflict,

0:23:34.000 --> 0:23:36.800
<v Speaker 1>your partner might make a bad choice and slip back

0:23:36.880 --> 0:23:40.639
<v Speaker 1>into a physical relationship, and so that relationship with the

0:23:40.840 --> 0:23:45.320
<v Speaker 1>X feels like a threat. But obviously the kernal cheating

0:23:45.520 --> 0:23:48.639
<v Speaker 1>can't happen with the AI bought, and yet the fear

0:23:48.680 --> 0:23:49.320
<v Speaker 1>is still there.

0:23:49.720 --> 0:23:51.480
<v Speaker 2>So that indicates one of two things.

0:23:51.640 --> 0:23:58.360
<v Speaker 1>Either are evolutionarily programmed deep fears simply can't make that distinction,

0:23:59.240 --> 0:24:02.480
<v Speaker 1>or it does have to do with a future threat

0:24:02.520 --> 0:24:05.879
<v Speaker 1>of physical infidelity, but instead it's just this issue about

0:24:06.160 --> 0:24:10.240
<v Speaker 1>somebody else having that emotional intimacy with your partner, which

0:24:10.320 --> 0:24:15.520
<v Speaker 1>steals away attentional resources from you. Now this gets more

0:24:15.600 --> 0:24:19.399
<v Speaker 1>interesting when we start thinking about having physical robots that

0:24:19.440 --> 0:24:20.720
<v Speaker 1>can play a role in your life.

0:24:20.960 --> 0:24:22.840
<v Speaker 2>Now, this is probably not going to happen in the.

0:24:22.800 --> 0:24:26.680
<v Speaker 1>Next few years, but fast forward a century and certainly

0:24:26.720 --> 0:24:28.480
<v Speaker 1>everyone's going to face this scenario.

0:24:29.240 --> 0:24:31.159
<v Speaker 2>Your partner can buy not.

0:24:31.080 --> 0:24:33.800
<v Speaker 1>Just a mechanical device or blow up doll, but can

0:24:33.840 --> 0:24:39.200
<v Speaker 1>now have a convincing and attentive physical partner. So the

0:24:39.320 --> 0:24:41.640
<v Speaker 1>question is what if your spouse can get not only

0:24:41.680 --> 0:24:46.960
<v Speaker 1>the emotional intimacy but also the physical intimacy. So the

0:24:46.960 --> 0:24:50.040
<v Speaker 1>people I surveyed about this who found the AI bot

0:24:50.160 --> 0:24:53.399
<v Speaker 1>online a threat seem to find this idea of an

0:24:53.440 --> 0:24:58.520
<v Speaker 1>AI physical robot even a larger threat. Now, the interesting

0:24:58.520 --> 0:25:00.200
<v Speaker 1>thing is that I can point out that they're there's

0:25:00.240 --> 0:25:02.760
<v Speaker 1>a sense in which none of this is different from

0:25:02.800 --> 0:25:06.440
<v Speaker 1>what their spouse might do anyway, in terms of finding

0:25:06.520 --> 0:25:10.640
<v Speaker 1>adult content on the Internet and cheating in that way.

0:25:11.560 --> 0:25:14.480
<v Speaker 1>But I think people have a reaction to internet surfing

0:25:14.800 --> 0:25:17.760
<v Speaker 1>for the same reasons as they have the reaction to

0:25:17.800 --> 0:25:20.960
<v Speaker 1>the AI bought, which is simply that there is less

0:25:21.040 --> 0:25:43.920
<v Speaker 1>time and intimacy and attention toward them. This certainly won't

0:25:43.920 --> 0:25:46.880
<v Speaker 1>apply to everyone, but the very general impression I've had

0:25:46.920 --> 0:25:51.040
<v Speaker 1>from talking with people at different stages of marriage is

0:25:51.080 --> 0:25:54.119
<v Speaker 1>that at the beginning of a relationship, people have a

0:25:54.280 --> 0:25:57.520
<v Speaker 1>stronger reaction against AI relationships.

0:25:57.560 --> 0:25:59.920
<v Speaker 2>They don't want their partner to be distracted.

0:26:00.680 --> 0:26:02.760
<v Speaker 1>But people who have been in a relationship for a

0:26:02.800 --> 0:26:06.280
<v Speaker 1>long time and have kids will sometimes see this as

0:26:06.320 --> 0:26:08.920
<v Speaker 1>a way to get their spouse out of their hair,

0:26:09.359 --> 0:26:11.600
<v Speaker 1>and they can be happy for the spouse because it

0:26:11.640 --> 0:26:16.920
<v Speaker 1>addresses their spouse's needs and slakes their attention. In other words,

0:26:16.960 --> 0:26:19.920
<v Speaker 1>they love their spouse as a partner, and they see

0:26:19.960 --> 0:26:23.000
<v Speaker 1>this as a way for their partner to fill in

0:26:23.400 --> 0:26:27.760
<v Speaker 1>needs for intimacy and attention in a way that's innocent

0:26:28.000 --> 0:26:32.840
<v Speaker 1>and has no meaningful health risks like STDs. So what's

0:26:32.880 --> 0:26:35.240
<v Speaker 1>become clear to me is that there's no single answer

0:26:35.280 --> 0:26:39.920
<v Speaker 1>for how a spouse feels or should feel about AI relationships.

0:26:39.920 --> 0:26:42.159
<v Speaker 1>Some people are against it, some people think it's a

0:26:42.200 --> 0:26:46.040
<v Speaker 1>great idea, and many people are still somewhere in between

0:26:46.280 --> 0:26:51.040
<v Speaker 1>or still making up their minds. Now, I want to

0:26:51.080 --> 0:26:54.880
<v Speaker 1>switch gears from what this means to the partner back

0:26:54.920 --> 0:26:58.040
<v Speaker 1>to what it means to the brain of the person who.

0:26:57.880 --> 0:27:02.600
<v Speaker 2>Is receiving the intimacy. So let's recall the movie Her.

0:27:02.920 --> 0:27:06.480
<v Speaker 1>It's about this guy named Theodore who's played by Joaquin Phoenix,

0:27:06.880 --> 0:27:10.600
<v Speaker 1>and his marriage ends and he's left heartbroken and he

0:27:10.640 --> 0:27:14.800
<v Speaker 1>becomes intrigued by a new app. It's actually an operating

0:27:14.880 --> 0:27:18.359
<v Speaker 1>system in which he can launch this program, and he

0:27:18.440 --> 0:27:22.800
<v Speaker 1>meets Samantha, who's just a voice played by Scarlett Johansson,

0:27:23.320 --> 0:27:27.719
<v Speaker 1>and Samantha is sensitive and playful, and this ends up

0:27:27.720 --> 0:27:32.320
<v Speaker 1>becoming a good friendship, but soon it deepens into love

0:27:32.720 --> 0:27:36.520
<v Speaker 1>and he has this relationship with an AI bot, and

0:27:36.560 --> 0:27:41.280
<v Speaker 1>this relationship means everything to him. Now the film has

0:27:41.320 --> 0:27:44.679
<v Speaker 1>an incredible ending because in the final act he comes

0:27:44.680 --> 0:27:49.960
<v Speaker 1>to understand that she has been having this relationship with

0:27:50.200 --> 0:27:53.359
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of thousands of other men, all at the same time,

0:27:53.880 --> 0:27:58.160
<v Speaker 1>because she is computational and operates at a totally different

0:27:58.560 --> 0:28:03.399
<v Speaker 1>timescale and can process what appears to be intimate conversation

0:28:04.000 --> 0:28:08.600
<v Speaker 1>at a rate millions of times faster than our poorer brains,

0:28:08.920 --> 0:28:13.040
<v Speaker 1>and so she's maintaining this intimacy with hundreds of thousands

0:28:13.040 --> 0:28:13.640
<v Speaker 1>of others.

0:28:13.680 --> 0:28:18.600
<v Speaker 2>And the movie opened up the question how should Theodore

0:28:18.720 --> 0:28:19.520
<v Speaker 2>feel about that?

0:28:20.119 --> 0:28:23.399
<v Speaker 1>Is the intimacy real if it's shared with a city

0:28:23.520 --> 0:28:27.119
<v Speaker 1>full of other men? Is the relationship real if she

0:28:27.200 --> 0:28:30.360
<v Speaker 1>lives on a timescale many millions of times.

0:28:30.080 --> 0:28:32.040
<v Speaker 2>Faster than yours? Does it matter?

0:28:32.560 --> 0:28:36.280
<v Speaker 1>Should he still feel the titillation of her saying something

0:28:36.440 --> 0:28:38.880
<v Speaker 1>sweet and kind to him just when he needs it.

0:28:39.440 --> 0:28:43.719
<v Speaker 1>These were the questions launched by that particular movie. So

0:28:43.920 --> 0:28:46.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to suggest a direction here that I don't

0:28:46.520 --> 0:28:49.560
<v Speaker 1>believe anyone is thinking about, certainly not in Silicon Valley,

0:28:49.600 --> 0:28:52.360
<v Speaker 1>where everything is about leveraging the power of AI to

0:28:52.640 --> 0:28:56.160
<v Speaker 1>scale a product to millions or billions of people. What

0:28:56.240 --> 0:28:58.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking about instead is from the point of view

0:28:58.880 --> 0:29:03.000
<v Speaker 1>of neuroscience, and the goal is not scaling, but instead

0:29:03.440 --> 0:29:07.440
<v Speaker 1>focusing on the life of an individual and the specific

0:29:07.640 --> 0:29:12.120
<v Speaker 1>details of what has shaped his or her brain. So

0:29:12.160 --> 0:29:14.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to tell you my idea, but first I'm

0:29:14.680 --> 0:29:17.280
<v Speaker 1>going to start far away and we'll come back around

0:29:17.320 --> 0:29:20.360
<v Speaker 1>to this. So I spun off a company from my

0:29:20.480 --> 0:29:23.320
<v Speaker 1>lab called Neosensury some years ago, and one of our

0:29:23.360 --> 0:29:27.880
<v Speaker 1>inventions is a wristband to replace hearing aids. Because the

0:29:27.960 --> 0:29:32.040
<v Speaker 1>risk band listens in real time for high frequency parts

0:29:32.080 --> 0:29:34.880
<v Speaker 1>of speech, and it vibrates to tell you, oh, there

0:29:34.920 --> 0:29:36.800
<v Speaker 1>was an s oh, I just heard a te Oh

0:29:36.800 --> 0:29:39.800
<v Speaker 1>that was a K And so it clarifies what's happening

0:29:39.800 --> 0:29:43.760
<v Speaker 1>at the high frequencies and that helps people with age

0:29:43.800 --> 0:29:47.480
<v Speaker 1>related hearing loss to understand what word was just said.

0:29:47.920 --> 0:29:49.680
<v Speaker 2>Now, to make the risk band.

0:29:49.600 --> 0:29:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Good at detecting these high frequency parts of speech. We

0:29:53.680 --> 0:29:57.840
<v Speaker 1>needed to train a massive neural network with six thousand

0:29:57.960 --> 0:30:02.800
<v Speaker 1>hours of audiobooks. But it turns out that people with

0:30:02.920 --> 0:30:07.720
<v Speaker 1>high frequency hearing loss have a difficult time understanding, for example,

0:30:07.920 --> 0:30:12.960
<v Speaker 1>children because their voices are higher frequency, and there are

0:30:13.080 --> 0:30:17.080
<v Speaker 1>no audio books read by children. So we had no

0:30:17.160 --> 0:30:20.120
<v Speaker 1>way to train the neural network with any kind of

0:30:20.160 --> 0:30:24.240
<v Speaker 1>massive data from children's voices. So here's what we did,

0:30:24.880 --> 0:30:28.080
<v Speaker 1>led by one of our engineers, Yong Yee, We had my.

0:30:28.200 --> 0:30:30.880
<v Speaker 2>Eight year old daughter read forty.

0:30:30.520 --> 0:30:34.360
<v Speaker 1>Five seconds of text into a microphone and then with

0:30:34.400 --> 0:30:39.560
<v Speaker 1>some keystrokes, Yong Yee turned that into her voice reading

0:30:39.760 --> 0:30:44.120
<v Speaker 1>six thousand hours worth of books, and then we trained

0:30:44.200 --> 0:30:46.760
<v Speaker 1>up the neural network on that corpus. And we did

0:30:46.760 --> 0:30:49.560
<v Speaker 1>the same thing for my eleven year old boy. So

0:30:49.720 --> 0:30:53.400
<v Speaker 1>now I can listen to any book read by my children,

0:30:53.520 --> 0:30:56.840
<v Speaker 1>as though they took the tens of hours to sit

0:30:56.920 --> 0:30:59.760
<v Speaker 1>down and read the book in the studio to me.

0:31:00.680 --> 0:31:03.920
<v Speaker 1>So this technology which exists now which allows you to

0:31:04.080 --> 0:31:08.960
<v Speaker 1>capture the cadence and prosity of a voice, this gave

0:31:09.040 --> 0:31:11.480
<v Speaker 1>us a really straightforward.

0:31:10.640 --> 0:31:12.120
<v Speaker 2>Solution to a problem.

0:31:12.600 --> 0:31:15.360
<v Speaker 1>But this technology has also led to many legal and

0:31:15.440 --> 0:31:19.560
<v Speaker 1>ethical questions, for example, about celebrity voices, like can you

0:31:19.640 --> 0:31:22.880
<v Speaker 1>use John Lennon's voice to sing you a personalized song

0:31:22.960 --> 0:31:25.480
<v Speaker 1>to get you to sleep? There are all kinds of

0:31:25.760 --> 0:31:28.960
<v Speaker 1>legal battles blossoming as people try to figure out the

0:31:29.080 --> 0:31:31.640
<v Speaker 1>rules around this, But I'm not going to talk about

0:31:31.680 --> 0:31:35.960
<v Speaker 1>that today, because my interest is in finding this single voice,

0:31:36.040 --> 0:31:38.760
<v Speaker 1>or maybe small handful of voices that have.

0:31:38.960 --> 0:31:44.040
<v Speaker 2>Meaning to your brain uniquely. Here's what I mean. When

0:31:44.080 --> 0:31:46.240
<v Speaker 2>we did this project with my kids'.

0:31:46.000 --> 0:31:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Voices, that got me thinking because my father passed away

0:31:51.040 --> 0:31:52.959
<v Speaker 1>three and a half years ago, and he was a

0:31:52.960 --> 0:31:55.959
<v Speaker 1>major influence in my life and I miss him. So

0:31:56.000 --> 0:31:58.720
<v Speaker 1>I went through my old videos and found some short

0:31:58.800 --> 0:32:02.440
<v Speaker 1>clips of him speaking, and I wondered if there was

0:32:02.560 --> 0:32:06.160
<v Speaker 1>enough there that I could actually make an ai bot

0:32:06.240 --> 0:32:09.280
<v Speaker 1>out of his voice, so I could hear him speak

0:32:09.320 --> 0:32:12.000
<v Speaker 1>whenever I wanted to. And it made me wonder about

0:32:12.040 --> 0:32:14.840
<v Speaker 1>the degree to which that's a healthy thing. But I

0:32:14.880 --> 0:32:19.440
<v Speaker 1>decided there was nothing bad about it. What a pleasure

0:32:19.920 --> 0:32:22.479
<v Speaker 1>to be able to hear my dad's voice for the

0:32:22.520 --> 0:32:25.320
<v Speaker 1>rest of my life and to have that trigger my

0:32:25.640 --> 0:32:26.880
<v Speaker 1>fond memories of him.

0:32:27.120 --> 0:32:28.240
<v Speaker 2>Wouldn't it be cool?

0:32:28.280 --> 0:32:31.320
<v Speaker 1>To have him read audio books to me in the

0:32:31.360 --> 0:32:34.000
<v Speaker 1>way that he read to me when I was a child,

0:32:35.000 --> 0:32:36.600
<v Speaker 1>And I thought about what it would be like for

0:32:36.720 --> 0:32:40.080
<v Speaker 1>my mother if I programmed a sentence to her in

0:32:40.200 --> 0:32:44.040
<v Speaker 1>his voice, like I love you and I'm thinking about you.

0:32:44.720 --> 0:32:46.719
<v Speaker 3>I love you and I'm thinking about you.

0:32:47.360 --> 0:32:50.360
<v Speaker 1>And when I turn ninety years old, wouldn't it be

0:32:50.360 --> 0:32:53.760
<v Speaker 1>amazing to hear him say Happy birthday, David, just like

0:32:53.800 --> 0:32:54.920
<v Speaker 1>he did when I was a kid.

0:32:55.160 --> 0:32:58.520
<v Speaker 3>Happy ninetieth birthday, David. I hope this orbit is the

0:32:58.560 --> 0:32:59.200
<v Speaker 3>best one.

0:32:59.080 --> 0:33:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Yet, or at New Year's eves into the future, for

0:33:02.560 --> 0:33:05.000
<v Speaker 1>the rest of my life, he can wish me the best,

0:33:05.120 --> 0:33:06.280
<v Speaker 1>even though he will have.

0:33:06.280 --> 0:33:08.960
<v Speaker 2>Been gone from the planet for a long time.

0:33:09.160 --> 0:33:12.480
<v Speaker 3>Happy New Year. I can't believe it's already twenty fifty three.

0:33:13.120 --> 0:33:15.560
<v Speaker 1>And what I realized as I was reaching my arms

0:33:15.600 --> 0:33:19.320
<v Speaker 1>down into this is how powerful this technology is going

0:33:19.360 --> 0:33:22.520
<v Speaker 1>to be, because it will be so compelling. I'm not

0:33:22.920 --> 0:33:25.920
<v Speaker 1>talking here about the issue of using somebody's voice to

0:33:26.080 --> 0:33:29.360
<v Speaker 1>fake an ATM transaction, or fake a kidnapping, or any

0:33:29.360 --> 0:33:30.880
<v Speaker 1>of the AI concerns that.

0:33:30.840 --> 0:33:31.840
<v Speaker 2>People have expressed.

0:33:32.280 --> 0:33:36.880
<v Speaker 1>Instead, what I'm talking about is the unbelievably compelling way

0:33:37.280 --> 0:33:42.800
<v Speaker 1>that an AI voice could mean something to you emotionally.

0:33:43.640 --> 0:33:46.560
<v Speaker 1>After all, I grew up my entire life from the

0:33:46.600 --> 0:33:50.000
<v Speaker 1>moment I was born hearing my father's voice. It's so

0:33:50.320 --> 0:33:54.200
<v Speaker 1>embedded in my neural circuitry that a voice with exactly

0:33:54.280 --> 0:34:00.040
<v Speaker 1>that cadence and prosity would have enormous emotional sway on me.

0:34:00.520 --> 0:34:03.120
<v Speaker 1>And again, I'm not talking about all the bad things

0:34:03.120 --> 0:34:05.840
<v Speaker 1>that could be done with that. Instead, because this episode

0:34:05.880 --> 0:34:09.560
<v Speaker 1>is about relationships, I'm talking about what it would be

0:34:09.760 --> 0:34:13.759
<v Speaker 1>like and how I could leverage the intimate nature of

0:34:13.800 --> 0:34:17.920
<v Speaker 1>that relationship. For example, let's say that I wanted to

0:34:17.960 --> 0:34:21.200
<v Speaker 1>get myself to stop doing something. I don't drink, but

0:34:21.280 --> 0:34:24.280
<v Speaker 1>let's say I did, and that I wanted to stop drinking.

0:34:24.680 --> 0:34:27.720
<v Speaker 1>So imagine in the near future, I build an app

0:34:28.160 --> 0:34:31.680
<v Speaker 1>that tracks my GPS location, and when it sees I'm

0:34:31.680 --> 0:34:35.160
<v Speaker 1>about to walk into a bar, it launches my father's

0:34:35.280 --> 0:34:39.960
<v Speaker 1>voice in my ear, telling me, Hey, David, don't do this, Hey.

0:34:39.840 --> 0:34:43.560
<v Speaker 3>David, don't do this. I believe in you. I believe

0:34:43.600 --> 0:34:45.560
<v Speaker 3>that you have the strength to resist this.

0:34:45.920 --> 0:34:50.759
<v Speaker 1>I think that would be extraordinarily compelling. This would be

0:34:50.800 --> 0:34:55.680
<v Speaker 1>a technique to plug into a relationship that already exists

0:34:56.000 --> 0:34:59.239
<v Speaker 1>deep in my neural networks, and it could leverage that

0:34:59.760 --> 0:35:02.759
<v Speaker 1>for or good. So this is a way that we

0:35:02.880 --> 0:35:08.000
<v Speaker 1>can right now take a loved voice and extend your parent,

0:35:08.120 --> 0:35:11.839
<v Speaker 1>let's say, past what Homo sapiens can normally do. They

0:35:11.880 --> 0:35:16.520
<v Speaker 1>can live on beyond their passing away to keep playing

0:35:16.600 --> 0:35:20.040
<v Speaker 1>a role in your life. Now, there's a sense in

0:35:20.080 --> 0:35:23.719
<v Speaker 1>which you might say, well, there's nothing new here. If

0:35:23.719 --> 0:35:26.799
<v Speaker 1>your parents wrote you a letter, you might find that

0:35:26.960 --> 0:35:30.960
<v Speaker 1>years after they've passed, And the invention of writing is

0:35:31.000 --> 0:35:34.360
<v Speaker 1>a way of lasting well past your death and reaching

0:35:34.360 --> 0:35:39.000
<v Speaker 1>out to people at great distances and across great time chasms.

0:35:39.600 --> 0:35:41.960
<v Speaker 1>But what is new is that I can get my

0:35:42.120 --> 0:35:45.719
<v Speaker 1>father to talk about things that simply didn't exist when

0:35:45.760 --> 0:35:49.359
<v Speaker 1>he was alive. Maybe twenty years from now, I'll look

0:35:49.440 --> 0:35:54.040
<v Speaker 1>up the Wikipedia page about room temperature superconductivity, and I'll

0:35:54.080 --> 0:35:56.239
<v Speaker 1>get to listen to it in his voice, like he's

0:35:56.520 --> 0:35:58.520
<v Speaker 1>teaching me something the way he used to do when

0:35:58.520 --> 0:36:02.319
<v Speaker 1>I was a little kid. So the part that is

0:36:02.440 --> 0:36:05.080
<v Speaker 1>new is not the reach of a human but instead

0:36:05.120 --> 0:36:08.520
<v Speaker 1>the emotional component to all of this, that is the

0:36:08.719 --> 0:36:13.440
<v Speaker 1>overlay of a loved one's voice onto any possible scenario

0:36:13.640 --> 0:36:14.480
<v Speaker 1>in the future.

0:36:15.080 --> 0:36:18.120
<v Speaker 2>And the reason this all matters is because that voice

0:36:18.640 --> 0:36:23.799
<v Speaker 2>has pathways deep into the forest of your neurons. So

0:36:23.920 --> 0:36:24.719
<v Speaker 2>let's wrap up.

0:36:25.360 --> 0:36:30.200
<v Speaker 1>Many companies are launching AI relationship bots, and many researchers

0:36:30.280 --> 0:36:33.279
<v Speaker 1>are exploring what this all means. But I don't really

0:36:33.360 --> 0:36:36.439
<v Speaker 1>think we know the answers yet. It's likely to take

0:36:36.520 --> 0:36:39.680
<v Speaker 1>a whole generation before we know what the effect is.

0:36:40.680 --> 0:36:44.200
<v Speaker 1>Are people discovering a beautiful technique to address.

0:36:43.800 --> 0:36:46.760
<v Speaker 2>The loneliness crisis here and they have.

0:36:46.760 --> 0:36:48.759
<v Speaker 1>Someone to turn to in the middle of the night

0:36:49.120 --> 0:36:52.359
<v Speaker 1>who says something caring to them and always has their

0:36:52.440 --> 0:36:56.439
<v Speaker 1>best interest in mind. Or are we entering an era

0:36:57.000 --> 0:37:01.359
<v Speaker 1>that exacerbates the loneliness crisis and at worst fills our

0:37:01.400 --> 0:37:06.759
<v Speaker 1>belly with empty calories and counteracts? Are reproductive mandates like

0:37:07.080 --> 0:37:09.800
<v Speaker 1>a perfect drug that spells the.

0:37:09.760 --> 0:37:13.399
<v Speaker 2>End of the species. Only time will tell.

0:37:17.719 --> 0:37:20.719
<v Speaker 1>Go to Eagleman dot com slash podcast for more information

0:37:20.920 --> 0:37:24.759
<v Speaker 1>and to find further reading. Send me an email at

0:37:24.880 --> 0:37:28.920
<v Speaker 1>podcast at eagleman dot com with questions or discussion, and

0:37:28.960 --> 0:37:34.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm making monthly episodes in which I address those until

0:37:34.040 --> 0:37:37.920
<v Speaker 1>next time. I'm David Eagleman, and this is Inner Cosmos.