WEBVTT - It's a Numbers Game: The Numbers Behind 2028: Is JD Vance Inevitable? Democrats in Disarray & Jeffries’ House Problem

0:00:03.120 --> 0:00:05.280
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to a Numbers game with Ryan Groski. Thank

0:00:05.320 --> 0:00:08.119
<v Speaker 1>you all for being here. I want to say Happy

0:00:08.119 --> 0:00:10.680
<v Speaker 1>Saint Patrick's Day and recording this the day before, so

0:00:10.720 --> 0:00:13.760
<v Speaker 1>it is Saint Patrick's Day as the recording of this,

0:00:14.000 --> 0:00:16.640
<v Speaker 1>and I want to wish everyone who is of Irish

0:00:16.960 --> 0:00:20.639
<v Speaker 1>ancestry or who has Irish ancestry. I meant to say,

0:00:20.760 --> 0:00:23.680
<v Speaker 1>who has Irish ancestry like myself, a very happy Saint

0:00:23.680 --> 0:00:26.800
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Day. I hope you all celebrate being Irish, really

0:00:26.840 --> 0:00:30.600
<v Speaker 1>being Irish, which apparently the President of Ireland and the

0:00:30.600 --> 0:00:33.400
<v Speaker 1>Prime Minister of Ireland do not share my joy of

0:00:33.880 --> 0:00:36.720
<v Speaker 1>the history of the Celtic people. I don't know if

0:00:36.840 --> 0:00:39.960
<v Speaker 1>if anyone saw it, but Michael Martin, the Prime Minister

0:00:39.960 --> 0:00:44.519
<v Speaker 1>of Ireland, was in Washington on Saint Patrick's Day. I

0:00:44.560 --> 0:00:47.519
<v Speaker 1>attended an event in the morning with Vice President of Advance.

0:00:47.920 --> 0:00:51.040
<v Speaker 1>There was a prayer. President Advance blessed himself. Michael Martin

0:00:51.080 --> 0:00:54.840
<v Speaker 1>didn't because the Irish politicians are allergic to being Catholic

0:00:55.000 --> 0:00:58.320
<v Speaker 1>or having Catholic ancestry and lineage to them. Then sat

0:00:58.360 --> 0:01:01.440
<v Speaker 1>with President Trump and nod how Ireland has just been

0:01:01.520 --> 0:01:04.839
<v Speaker 1>thriving because of mass immigration. One in four people living

0:01:04.840 --> 0:01:08.000
<v Speaker 1>in Ireland now is an immigrant. They've opened the floodgates

0:01:08.080 --> 0:01:10.600
<v Speaker 1>across the country to Ireland and to the Middle East,

0:01:10.600 --> 0:01:15.480
<v Speaker 1>and it's doing wonders for petty theft and for housing prices.

0:01:15.560 --> 0:01:19.360
<v Speaker 1>And you know there's Irish citizens rogue, Irish citizens burning

0:01:19.400 --> 0:01:22.679
<v Speaker 1>down asylum hotels. He mentions none of that. He says

0:01:22.680 --> 0:01:25.959
<v Speaker 1>it's right with the economy is thriving. And Trump, to

0:01:26.120 --> 0:01:28.080
<v Speaker 1>his credit, actually did push back and said a lot

0:01:28.080 --> 0:01:30.720
<v Speaker 1>of problems are coming with it. And then over in

0:01:30.760 --> 0:01:34.200
<v Speaker 1>Ireland you had the new Irish president, Catherine Connolly, who

0:01:34.240 --> 0:01:38.039
<v Speaker 1>wore black, refused to call Saint Patrick Saint Patrick. She's

0:01:38.080 --> 0:01:40.679
<v Speaker 1>called him Patrick as if she was his drinking buddy,

0:01:41.480 --> 0:01:44.840
<v Speaker 1>and then talked about how it's really a day about migration.

0:01:45.720 --> 0:01:47.760
<v Speaker 1>For those who don't know the history of Saint Patrick.

0:01:47.800 --> 0:01:51.280
<v Speaker 1>He was a slave. He wasn't a migrant. It is

0:01:51.320 --> 0:01:54.680
<v Speaker 1>an insult to call a he was a slave. I mean,

0:01:55.120 --> 0:01:57.840
<v Speaker 1>it was no migration, there was no passport. He went there.

0:01:57.880 --> 0:02:01.280
<v Speaker 1>He was forcibly brought to Ireland, but did great things

0:02:01.320 --> 0:02:06.480
<v Speaker 1>with his time there. And it's absolutely in furi The

0:02:06.520 --> 0:02:10.800
<v Speaker 1>Irish politicians who govern that country are embarrassments. I know,

0:02:10.840 --> 0:02:13.320
<v Speaker 1>I have a few Irish listeners. I have relatives who

0:02:13.360 --> 0:02:15.920
<v Speaker 1>live in County Cork, I have relatives who live in Belfast.

0:02:17.120 --> 0:02:22.080
<v Speaker 1>It's an embarrassment. It's the most embarrassing politicians of any

0:02:22.160 --> 0:02:26.120
<v Speaker 1>country in Europe. And England has Cure Starmer. That just

0:02:26.200 --> 0:02:30.040
<v Speaker 1>goes to show how badly Ireland has fallen on its times.

0:02:30.080 --> 0:02:33.880
<v Speaker 1>And Ireland is the last country in all of Europe,

0:02:33.880 --> 0:02:37.480
<v Speaker 1>to Western Europe especially not to have an effective populist

0:02:37.480 --> 0:02:39.880
<v Speaker 1>party pushing back in immigration. I know there's the Independence

0:02:39.919 --> 0:02:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Ireland Party, but they're very small, they're very minor. They're

0:02:43.600 --> 0:02:45.119
<v Speaker 1>trying to get it together. They only have I think

0:02:45.160 --> 0:02:50.079
<v Speaker 1>three seats in their parliament, not enough to have any

0:02:50.160 --> 0:02:52.919
<v Speaker 1>kind of effective governing. And the three major parties all

0:02:52.919 --> 0:02:54.840
<v Speaker 1>believe in the same thing, which is the erasure of

0:02:54.919 --> 0:02:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Irish history, of Irish people in Irish culture. Absolutely horror,

0:03:00.600 --> 0:03:05.520
<v Speaker 1>especially on a day to celebrate the resilience of the

0:03:05.560 --> 0:03:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Irish people and all that Ireland gave the world. I mean,

0:03:10.320 --> 0:03:13.120
<v Speaker 1>it's absolutely astonishing. And you know, it's so funny. There

0:03:13.160 --> 0:03:16.079
<v Speaker 1>was an app on I see the ads on Instagram

0:03:16.120 --> 0:03:18.080
<v Speaker 1>all the time. It's a history app. I don't know

0:03:18.080 --> 0:03:20.359
<v Speaker 1>the name of it, but they one day talked about

0:03:20.360 --> 0:03:23.359
<v Speaker 1>the two hundred thousand Irish orphans that were shipped to

0:03:23.400 --> 0:03:27.800
<v Speaker 1>America and used basically as slave labor, and Irish slavery,

0:03:27.800 --> 0:03:29.960
<v Speaker 1>which has never talked about in his own country. And

0:03:30.000 --> 0:03:32.480
<v Speaker 1>the endurance of the Irish people to survive is by

0:03:32.560 --> 0:03:38.360
<v Speaker 1>famine and really horrific treatment, and now their politicians are

0:03:38.360 --> 0:03:41.240
<v Speaker 1>willing to wipe that all away in the name of diversity.

0:03:41.280 --> 0:03:45.000
<v Speaker 1>They have traded hatred for the English for hatred for themselves.

0:03:45.440 --> 0:03:48.480
<v Speaker 1>And to quote a short lived poem by Patrick Pierce,

0:03:48.920 --> 0:03:51.200
<v Speaker 1>I am come of the seed of the people, the

0:03:51.240 --> 0:03:54.400
<v Speaker 1>people of that sorrow, that have no treasure, but hope,

0:03:54.520 --> 0:03:58.160
<v Speaker 1>no riches, laid a memory of an ancient glory. My

0:03:58.240 --> 0:04:01.200
<v Speaker 1>mother bore me into bondage, and as my mother was born,

0:04:01.600 --> 0:04:03.640
<v Speaker 1>I come of the seat of the people, the people

0:04:03.640 --> 0:04:07.560
<v Speaker 1>that sorrow. There's no reason Irish people to have any

0:04:07.600 --> 0:04:12.120
<v Speaker 1>sense of guilt whatsoever, or to destroy their heritage and

0:04:12.160 --> 0:04:16.040
<v Speaker 1>their country by flooding it with migrants from across the world.

0:04:16.200 --> 0:04:19.400
<v Speaker 1>Ireland needs, you know, a place for the Irish. It

0:04:20.520 --> 0:04:23.600
<v Speaker 1>is what it is anyway. I'm not an Irish citizen.

0:04:23.640 --> 0:04:25.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know why I care so much. I think

0:04:25.040 --> 0:04:28.880
<v Speaker 1>it's because the Irish heritage, and I have relatives named Seamus,

0:04:29.720 --> 0:04:33.159
<v Speaker 1>so I mean, you get about Irish as it gets,

0:04:33.160 --> 0:04:37.640
<v Speaker 1>and just to see that just our collective ancestry being

0:04:37.760 --> 0:04:41.920
<v Speaker 1>washed away. Okay, enough about Ireland, let's talk about America.

0:04:43.720 --> 0:04:46.880
<v Speaker 1>I am. I know what you're all thinking right now.

0:04:47.440 --> 0:04:50.719
<v Speaker 1>You're all thinking, Ryan, you were right again? How did

0:04:50.760 --> 0:04:53.599
<v Speaker 1>you know? How'd you do it? And you're probably all saying,

0:04:53.640 --> 0:04:56.880
<v Speaker 1>what are you talking about? So I set a month

0:04:56.920 --> 0:05:00.719
<v Speaker 1>ago on this podcast that Hakem Jeffrey is going to

0:05:00.839 --> 0:05:03.279
<v Speaker 1>quickly wake up and realize that if he has a

0:05:03.279 --> 0:05:06.920
<v Speaker 1>House majority in January, it will be the house that

0:05:07.000 --> 0:05:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Bernie Sanders built. Bernie Sanders and progressive activists who love

0:05:11.600 --> 0:05:15.640
<v Speaker 1>Bernie have been winning primaries across the country. They are

0:05:15.760 --> 0:05:18.960
<v Speaker 1>changing the face of the Democratic Party, and a lot

0:05:19.000 --> 0:05:23.280
<v Speaker 1>of them not big fans of Hakeem Jeffries, and they're

0:05:23.320 --> 0:05:26.200
<v Speaker 1>increasingly saying they're unsure if they're going to support him

0:05:26.600 --> 0:05:30.400
<v Speaker 1>for House Speaker. Axios. That's what I said a month ago.

0:05:30.520 --> 0:05:32.280
<v Speaker 1>Now Axis is out with a new report that had

0:05:32.320 --> 0:05:36.680
<v Speaker 1>a number of Democratic candidates coming forward and saying they

0:05:36.720 --> 0:05:38.920
<v Speaker 1>are unsure who the next Speaker will be that they're

0:05:38.960 --> 0:05:40.960
<v Speaker 1>not gung ho for Hakim. This is the quint of

0:05:41.000 --> 0:05:45.320
<v Speaker 1>axious Why it matters. It is a stark reversal from Jefferies'

0:05:45.440 --> 0:05:48.840
<v Speaker 1>virtual untouchable standing in the Democratic Party just a few

0:05:48.920 --> 0:05:50.839
<v Speaker 1>years ago, and a sign that has passed the speaker

0:05:51.160 --> 0:05:54.880
<v Speaker 1>may be rockier then previously thought. Jeffries and his allies

0:05:54.920 --> 0:05:58.000
<v Speaker 1>maintained there's not a remotely worried about a massed affection,

0:05:58.400 --> 0:06:01.920
<v Speaker 1>pointing out that even the minority, he has endured twenty

0:06:01.960 --> 0:06:05.159
<v Speaker 1>speaker ballots and hasn't lost a Democratic vote. But this

0:06:05.279 --> 0:06:08.080
<v Speaker 1>crop of freshmen may provide the first chink in here

0:06:08.200 --> 0:06:11.919
<v Speaker 1>two four impenetrable armor, with a block of genuinely viable

0:06:11.960 --> 0:06:15.120
<v Speaker 1>candidates making clear that voting for Jeffries as Speaker is

0:06:15.160 --> 0:06:18.200
<v Speaker 1>not a given if the Democrats take the House. As

0:06:18.240 --> 0:06:22.159
<v Speaker 1>of now, there are eighty candidates running for a Congress

0:06:22.200 --> 0:06:26.240
<v Speaker 1>this year who say they are not committed to backing Jeffries.

0:06:26.520 --> 0:06:30.520
<v Speaker 1>That is not a small number. Especially Democrats find themselves

0:06:30.520 --> 0:06:32.919
<v Speaker 1>in the same place that Kevin McCarthy did a couple

0:06:32.920 --> 0:06:35.279
<v Speaker 1>of years ago. You have a majority, it's not a

0:06:35.360 --> 0:06:38.040
<v Speaker 1>huge majority. What do you do A couple of defections

0:06:38.200 --> 0:06:41.280
<v Speaker 1>means you have to concede a lot of things to them.

0:06:42.040 --> 0:06:46.600
<v Speaker 1>It means you're not guaranteed to get the speakership. And

0:06:46.880 --> 0:06:50.040
<v Speaker 1>in the era of Trump two point zero term two

0:06:50.080 --> 0:06:54.120
<v Speaker 1>point zero, there is a lot of belief among rank

0:06:54.200 --> 0:06:57.560
<v Speaker 1>and not rank Bible but activist Democrats the Democratic Party

0:06:57.640 --> 0:07:00.920
<v Speaker 1>is not doing enough to fight the Orange Man right

0:07:00.960 --> 0:07:05.320
<v Speaker 1>that the Democrats have gone along with funding the government

0:07:05.400 --> 0:07:07.320
<v Speaker 1>that they've gone along with other things that they should

0:07:07.320 --> 0:07:10.160
<v Speaker 1>have been doing more whatever it is more, I don't know.

0:07:10.240 --> 0:07:12.680
<v Speaker 1>I think some Democrat activists would have wanted the Democrats

0:07:12.680 --> 0:07:15.320
<v Speaker 1>to shut down the government of day one. They possibly

0:07:15.360 --> 0:07:17.840
<v Speaker 1>could have and kept the government shut down all four years.

0:07:18.600 --> 0:07:21.920
<v Speaker 1>And Jeffries hasn't gone along with that because being leader

0:07:22.040 --> 0:07:26.000
<v Speaker 1>means you have to govern responsibly, So no surprise that

0:07:26.040 --> 0:07:29.600
<v Speaker 1>he didn't do that. What Jeffries has going for him

0:07:29.680 --> 0:07:31.720
<v Speaker 1>is the same thing that McCarthy had going for me

0:07:31.720 --> 0:07:37.680
<v Speaker 1>is that there's no central opposition. Pelosi faced opposition a

0:07:37.720 --> 0:07:40.080
<v Speaker 1>few times while she was Speaker, but there was a

0:07:40.120 --> 0:07:42.440
<v Speaker 1>person running against her. There was a guy who running

0:07:42.480 --> 0:07:44.240
<v Speaker 1>against her and saying I'm going to be the opposition.

0:07:44.280 --> 0:07:47.640
<v Speaker 1>They always lost, but there was someone to rally troops

0:07:47.720 --> 0:07:54.240
<v Speaker 1>against Pelosi. There is no one rallying troops against Jeffrey's

0:07:54.240 --> 0:07:56.360
<v Speaker 1>like there's no one reallyships against McCarthy. They may be

0:07:56.440 --> 0:07:58.920
<v Speaker 1>someone saying I don't want him to be in power,

0:07:59.520 --> 0:08:01.600
<v Speaker 1>but there's no no one's saying vote for me instead,

0:08:01.640 --> 0:08:04.280
<v Speaker 1>which is important. Matt Gateston on McCarthy. But they didn't

0:08:04.280 --> 0:08:07.360
<v Speaker 1>find a consensus candidate. Wasn't like Gates himself was being

0:08:07.600 --> 0:08:12.080
<v Speaker 1>presented as a choice for speaker. There was nobody. It

0:08:12.160 --> 0:08:15.960
<v Speaker 1>was either McCarthy or nobody. And they're kind of having

0:08:16.040 --> 0:08:17.960
<v Speaker 1>the same situation with the Democratic Party right now. They

0:08:17.960 --> 0:08:21.960
<v Speaker 1>don't have a singular person offering a progressive vision who

0:08:21.960 --> 0:08:25.000
<v Speaker 1>could raise money, because that's a big part of the

0:08:25.080 --> 0:08:28.920
<v Speaker 1>job is who can raise money. And the truth is

0:08:28.960 --> 0:08:32.120
<v Speaker 1>you can't beat somebody with nobody, unless AOC or someone

0:08:32.360 --> 0:08:35.720
<v Speaker 1>like that who has the belief, the support, the troops,

0:08:35.760 --> 0:08:38.800
<v Speaker 1>the money, and I can't with this money is very

0:08:38.840 --> 0:08:42.640
<v Speaker 1>important for the speaker. You're not going to find somebody

0:08:42.840 --> 0:08:47.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of break Hakeem Jefferies' lock on the Democratic Party.

0:08:47.040 --> 0:08:49.840
<v Speaker 1>So Haqem is safe right now, but things are dicey

0:08:50.600 --> 0:08:53.040
<v Speaker 1>and if they don't get their way or they kept blank,

0:08:53.120 --> 0:08:55.920
<v Speaker 1>or they cave one or two times, and they have

0:08:55.960 --> 0:08:58.680
<v Speaker 1>a small majority, it's going to be very very dicey

0:08:58.679 --> 0:09:02.960
<v Speaker 1>for Jeffries going anyway. That's my little nod to my

0:09:03.000 --> 0:09:05.520
<v Speaker 1>audience telling I told you guys, I was ahead of

0:09:05.520 --> 0:09:07.960
<v Speaker 1>the curb. I knew what was happening, and I think

0:09:07.960 --> 0:09:09.520
<v Speaker 1>this is going to be a long term issue for

0:09:09.600 --> 0:09:12.360
<v Speaker 1>Hikim Jeffreys and whoever governs the Democrats in the House.

0:09:12.360 --> 0:09:13.920
<v Speaker 1>The Democrats are going to act a lot more like

0:09:13.960 --> 0:09:16.160
<v Speaker 1>the Republicans in the House when it comes to being

0:09:16.280 --> 0:09:20.360
<v Speaker 1>less orderly. Now, I want to talk about something else

0:09:20.440 --> 0:09:23.280
<v Speaker 1>that people think is very far into the future, but

0:09:23.280 --> 0:09:25.960
<v Speaker 1>it's actually only a few months away, and that is

0:09:26.040 --> 0:09:28.640
<v Speaker 1>the twenty twenty eight presidential election. I know some of

0:09:28.640 --> 0:09:31.240
<v Speaker 1>you are like Ryan, that's four years away. No, it's not.

0:09:31.640 --> 0:09:35.360
<v Speaker 1>The first candidates who will announce their run for the

0:09:35.400 --> 0:09:39.920
<v Speaker 1>White House will happen within the next nine months. Basically,

0:09:40.480 --> 0:09:42.040
<v Speaker 1>you will have you could have a baby if you

0:09:42.040 --> 0:09:44.800
<v Speaker 1>get pregnant today, and you will have a Democrat running

0:09:44.800 --> 0:09:47.760
<v Speaker 1>for president or a Republican running for president by the

0:09:47.880 --> 0:09:51.000
<v Speaker 1>time that baby is born. It's not a long time

0:09:51.120 --> 0:09:54.640
<v Speaker 1>left before we're entering into the twenty twenty eight presidential cycle,

0:09:55.160 --> 0:09:58.240
<v Speaker 1>and there's two things. There's two essential questions, which is

0:09:58.320 --> 0:10:02.640
<v Speaker 1>one is JD Evans inevitable on the Republican side and

0:10:02.760 --> 0:10:05.959
<v Speaker 1>who is the most likely candidate on the Democratic side.

0:10:06.360 --> 0:10:10.120
<v Speaker 1>Let's go into the Republican side first. I get messages

0:10:10.160 --> 0:10:15.200
<v Speaker 1>about JD literally every single week from somebody saying, you know,

0:10:16.080 --> 0:10:19.160
<v Speaker 1>is the nomination process really over? What has he done

0:10:19.200 --> 0:10:21.520
<v Speaker 1>to deserve the nomination? Is he ready to be president?

0:10:21.559 --> 0:10:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Can we nominate someone else? Or is somebody else going

0:10:24.640 --> 0:10:29.440
<v Speaker 1>to run? Let me answer the last question first, Is

0:10:29.440 --> 0:10:32.400
<v Speaker 1>someone else going to run? Yes, other people are going

0:10:32.440 --> 0:10:36.000
<v Speaker 1>to run. Ted Cruz is almost definitely running for president.

0:10:36.320 --> 0:10:38.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, he believes that he's got some kind of

0:10:38.080 --> 0:10:40.960
<v Speaker 1>compact with God where he ends up being president one day.

0:10:41.000 --> 0:10:43.959
<v Speaker 1>He's almost destined. He's got this, you know, destined from

0:10:44.200 --> 0:10:48.160
<v Speaker 1>from Christ himself to be president United States side. Note,

0:10:48.200 --> 0:10:51.400
<v Speaker 1>you guys remember when he picked Carly Fiorini as his

0:10:51.520 --> 0:10:54.840
<v Speaker 1>vice presidential candidate and they kind of grass hands and

0:10:54.840 --> 0:10:56.520
<v Speaker 1>missed each other's hands at the rally. I don't know

0:10:56.559 --> 0:11:00.160
<v Speaker 1>why that kind of flashed in my memory as I

0:11:00.200 --> 0:11:02.520
<v Speaker 1>was recalling Ted Cruz running for president, but it did.

0:11:03.320 --> 0:11:06.719
<v Speaker 1>I've also heard rumors that Brian Kemp, Governor Georgia, is

0:11:06.720 --> 0:11:09.640
<v Speaker 1>strongly considering a run. Ron to Santa's governor Florida is

0:11:09.640 --> 0:11:13.119
<v Speaker 1>considering a run. I've heard Josh Holly, the Senator from Missouri,

0:11:13.240 --> 0:11:17.199
<v Speaker 1>is asking questions. Ram Paul says that he's exploring his options.

0:11:17.200 --> 0:11:20.680
<v Speaker 1>He's the senator from Kentucky. Steve Bannon, I've heard for

0:11:20.720 --> 0:11:23.760
<v Speaker 1>a while wanted to run. But the Epstein stuff, the

0:11:23.800 --> 0:11:26.240
<v Speaker 1>idea that he made this video tape with Epstein, not

0:11:26.640 --> 0:11:28.360
<v Speaker 1>not those kinds of tapes, but a different kind of

0:11:28.360 --> 0:11:32.040
<v Speaker 1>tape with Epstein and was interviewing him and never released

0:11:32.040 --> 0:11:35.120
<v Speaker 1>the footage and could have been very complimentary for Epstein,

0:11:35.160 --> 0:11:37.760
<v Speaker 1>possibly in the footage. Whatever the case may be, I heard,

0:11:37.800 --> 0:11:42.400
<v Speaker 1>it's really hurt his potential of running. There's other people

0:11:42.440 --> 0:11:44.680
<v Speaker 1>who want to run but don't really have a lane.

0:11:44.760 --> 0:11:47.839
<v Speaker 1>Telsea Gabbard I heard, is interested but doesn't know if

0:11:47.840 --> 0:11:50.040
<v Speaker 1>she has got a lane. R Okay Junior very much

0:11:50.160 --> 0:11:52.360
<v Speaker 1>wants to make a run for something and doesn't know

0:11:52.400 --> 0:11:55.040
<v Speaker 1>if he has a lane. And then there's the nine

0:11:55.120 --> 0:11:57.600
<v Speaker 1>hundred pounds elephant in the room, which is Mark or Rubio.

0:11:58.080 --> 0:12:03.360
<v Speaker 1>Now Rubio has been doing optionally good job as Secretary

0:12:03.400 --> 0:12:05.880
<v Speaker 1>of State, and everyone has taken notice, including the president,

0:12:07.160 --> 0:12:10.320
<v Speaker 1>and it's clear that Rubio is having an effect on

0:12:10.480 --> 0:12:14.520
<v Speaker 1>the President's thinking when it comes to foreign policy. According

0:12:14.559 --> 0:12:17.480
<v Speaker 1>to several reports, President Trump has asked multile people if

0:12:17.480 --> 0:12:20.320
<v Speaker 1>he should endure Vance or Rubia for president, and at

0:12:20.400 --> 0:12:22.640
<v Speaker 1>least one report said that a lot of donors really

0:12:22.679 --> 0:12:25.080
<v Speaker 1>do love Rubio. They love Rubia Moore. Also, I want

0:12:25.120 --> 0:12:28.079
<v Speaker 1>to point out that Susie is very close to Rubio

0:12:28.080 --> 0:12:31.360
<v Speaker 1>as well. Susie the chiefest staff. Now. Polling on the

0:12:31.440 --> 0:12:35.920
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty eight presidential race is very, very difficult because

0:12:36.000 --> 0:12:40.160
<v Speaker 1>there are multiple names that are being floated in these

0:12:40.200 --> 0:12:42.680
<v Speaker 1>polls who are not running, like Donald Trump Junior is

0:12:42.760 --> 0:12:45.440
<v Speaker 1>not running for president. There is no reason why a

0:12:45.480 --> 0:12:48.120
<v Speaker 1>pollster is throwing his name on a poll because it

0:12:48.240 --> 0:12:50.960
<v Speaker 1>changes the poll's outcome. Because the polls very very high.

0:12:51.440 --> 0:12:56.079
<v Speaker 1>Is the president's son, and it absolutely affects the way

0:12:56.120 --> 0:12:58.839
<v Speaker 1>that these polls are coming out in the certainty of

0:12:58.880 --> 0:13:01.880
<v Speaker 1>these polls, so other poles that just have the most

0:13:02.200 --> 0:13:05.960
<v Speaker 1>likely contenders. Vans has a formidable twenty two thirty point

0:13:06.480 --> 0:13:09.840
<v Speaker 1>lead against Rubio, who's a distance second, and then Dessanta's

0:13:09.880 --> 0:13:11.840
<v Speaker 1>is in third, and he's just in the high single

0:13:11.880 --> 0:13:15.280
<v Speaker 1>digits in early swing states and polls like in New Hampshire,

0:13:15.280 --> 0:13:18.440
<v Speaker 1>Advance is more than fifty percent. Even Rubio is not

0:13:18.440 --> 0:13:22.320
<v Speaker 1>even in double digits. Now. Obviously, if Trump were to

0:13:22.520 --> 0:13:26.960
<v Speaker 1>endorse Rubeo over Vans, that would change things considerably. But

0:13:27.040 --> 0:13:29.800
<v Speaker 1>I have a hard time seeing that happen. And here's

0:13:29.840 --> 0:13:33.000
<v Speaker 1>the reason Vans is doing fundraising for the twenty twenty

0:13:33.040 --> 0:13:37.120
<v Speaker 1>six midterms. Vance is creating these independent relationships with donors.

0:13:37.600 --> 0:13:41.439
<v Speaker 1>Vance is also whilst campaign isn't up and running yet,

0:13:42.320 --> 0:13:45.520
<v Speaker 1>it will escalate quickly after the midterms, and it will

0:13:45.559 --> 0:13:48.720
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of the infrastructure from the Trump twenty

0:13:48.800 --> 0:13:52.959
<v Speaker 1>twenty four campaign on his side and Rubio. That's I

0:13:53.040 --> 0:13:55.440
<v Speaker 1>think that's why Rubio has firmly said I'm not running.

0:13:55.440 --> 0:13:58.600
<v Speaker 1>Advance is running now. If there's going to be some

0:13:58.720 --> 0:14:02.559
<v Speaker 1>kind of upset where Rubio is shocks everybody and announces,

0:14:02.880 --> 0:14:04.920
<v Speaker 1>it has to be in the next six months, because

0:14:04.920 --> 0:14:06.760
<v Speaker 1>it's got to be. You have to get the jump

0:14:06.760 --> 0:14:11.520
<v Speaker 1>start to create a parallel organization and kind of take

0:14:11.559 --> 0:14:13.880
<v Speaker 1>over part of the Trump organization that I don't think

0:14:13.880 --> 0:14:17.080
<v Speaker 1>that Advance would just give up on his own. So no,

0:14:17.160 --> 0:14:20.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that vance is inevitable. But if you

0:14:20.120 --> 0:14:22.920
<v Speaker 1>were a betting man and you're placing your house on

0:14:23.000 --> 0:14:25.840
<v Speaker 1>the betting markets, you should bet on vance. That's what

0:14:25.960 --> 0:14:28.840
<v Speaker 1>my opinion. Now on the Democratic side, there's so many

0:14:28.880 --> 0:14:30.880
<v Speaker 1>people running it is becoming a clown car. You have

0:14:30.960 --> 0:14:34.840
<v Speaker 1>Kentucky Governor Andy Basheer, Senator of from New Jersey, Corey Booker.

0:14:34.920 --> 0:14:38.240
<v Speaker 1>You have Pete Buddhagjeeds. You have Rammanuel, former White House

0:14:38.240 --> 0:14:40.920
<v Speaker 1>Sheep of Staff or President Obama and mayor of Chicago.

0:14:41.280 --> 0:14:43.520
<v Speaker 1>You have Josh Green, the governor of Hawaii. I had

0:14:43.520 --> 0:14:44.800
<v Speaker 1>to look him up to I don't know who Josh

0:14:44.840 --> 0:14:47.200
<v Speaker 1>Green was when I first read that he was considering running.

0:14:47.400 --> 0:14:50.360
<v Speaker 1>Kamala Harris, the former Democratic nominee from twenty twenty four.

0:14:50.400 --> 0:14:54.040
<v Speaker 1>Senator Mark Kelly from Arizona, Senator Ruben Gego from Arizona,

0:14:54.440 --> 0:14:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Congressman Roe Connor from California, Governor Gavin Newsom from California,

0:14:58.800 --> 0:15:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Congress from Alexander Cortest from New York, Centator John Auso

0:15:02.120 --> 0:15:05.840
<v Speaker 1>from Georgia, Governor J. P. Pritzker from Illinois, and Governor

0:15:05.920 --> 0:15:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Joshapiro from Pennsylvania. Okay, that is the people who are

0:15:10.400 --> 0:15:13.760
<v Speaker 1>running on the Democratic side so far, those of the

0:15:13.840 --> 0:15:18.600
<v Speaker 1>names being floated so far. Early polls at this part

0:15:18.720 --> 0:15:23.480
<v Speaker 1>far out without someone sitting in office, really is about

0:15:23.560 --> 0:15:26.280
<v Speaker 1>name ID and obviously Kamala Harrison Gavin Newsom have the

0:15:26.360 --> 0:15:28.200
<v Speaker 1>highest name I D they have the upper hand in

0:15:28.280 --> 0:15:32.120
<v Speaker 1>these polls. But what is more important than the name

0:15:32.200 --> 0:15:36.080
<v Speaker 1>recognition for the Democratic nomination is the calendar. No one

0:15:36.120 --> 0:15:39.880
<v Speaker 1>is talking about this. See, the Democratic primaries has changed

0:15:39.880 --> 0:15:43.440
<v Speaker 1>significantly where states like Iowa and New Hampshire, which used

0:15:43.440 --> 0:15:46.360
<v Speaker 1>to go first, have been pushed aside from South Carolina.

0:15:46.400 --> 0:15:48.720
<v Speaker 1>The Democratic Party says they're too white, and you know,

0:15:48.760 --> 0:15:50.840
<v Speaker 1>white people, if they get a voice in the Democratic Party,

0:15:50.880 --> 0:15:53.400
<v Speaker 1>it's you know, that's bad news. Can't can't let a

0:15:53.440 --> 0:15:55.280
<v Speaker 1>white man from the Midwest have a voice in the

0:15:55.280 --> 0:15:58.479
<v Speaker 1>Democratic Party. Absolutely not allowed. So they've moved to South Carolina,

0:15:58.560 --> 0:16:03.200
<v Speaker 1>which is a majority black voting population with the Democratic primary.

0:16:03.560 --> 0:16:05.480
<v Speaker 1>And that is the way that most of the Deep

0:16:05.520 --> 0:16:08.680
<v Speaker 1>South still is. There's something like Florida. I don't think

0:16:08.680 --> 0:16:12.000
<v Speaker 1>that it's like that anymore. Texas is not like that anymore.

0:16:12.280 --> 0:16:14.560
<v Speaker 1>But most of the states in the South are still

0:16:14.600 --> 0:16:20.240
<v Speaker 1>black majority Democratic voting bates, and they favor candidates who

0:16:20.240 --> 0:16:23.160
<v Speaker 1>are more establishment, who are more centrists, and they give

0:16:23.240 --> 0:16:27.280
<v Speaker 1>the Democratic nomination. It is almost virtually impossible to win

0:16:27.320 --> 0:16:30.440
<v Speaker 1>the Democratic nomination without the support of older black women

0:16:30.600 --> 0:16:34.080
<v Speaker 1>in the Deep South. They nominated Joe Biden, Hillary Clinton,

0:16:34.120 --> 0:16:37.400
<v Speaker 1>Barack Obama, Bill Clinton. I mean only I think John Kerry,

0:16:37.400 --> 0:16:40.120
<v Speaker 1>and only because John Kerry won all the states before

0:16:40.160 --> 0:16:42.120
<v Speaker 1>the South, and so by that point it was just

0:16:42.200 --> 0:16:44.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of cleaning up. I think he lost, you know,

0:16:44.480 --> 0:16:46.560
<v Speaker 1>I think he lost North and South Carolina, but he

0:16:46.720 --> 0:16:49.240
<v Speaker 1>was the only one and he was able to speak

0:16:49.240 --> 0:16:52.360
<v Speaker 1>basically everywhere else. He might have lost one other state

0:16:52.520 --> 0:16:55.400
<v Speaker 1>to I think maybe lost Oklahoma as well, but he

0:16:56.080 --> 0:16:59.320
<v Speaker 1>basically swept the entire race very very quickly. But he

0:16:59.400 --> 0:17:04.000
<v Speaker 1>was once again the only one. So you need the

0:17:04.040 --> 0:17:06.640
<v Speaker 1>Deep South. You need old ladies, the black old ladies

0:17:06.720 --> 0:17:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Deep South. And who they support is who the likely

0:17:10.440 --> 0:17:13.919
<v Speaker 1>Democratic nominee eventually will be. They're not going to support

0:17:13.920 --> 0:17:15.639
<v Speaker 1>a people to judge. They're not going to vote for

0:17:15.680 --> 0:17:18.400
<v Speaker 1>a gay candidate. They're not going to support a radical

0:17:18.440 --> 0:17:20.600
<v Speaker 1>left winger. They're not going to support a Bernie Sanders.

0:17:20.760 --> 0:17:24.840
<v Speaker 1>They probably will not support an AOC. So that's who

0:17:24.920 --> 0:17:26.360
<v Speaker 1>you have to keep an eye out for. If you're

0:17:26.359 --> 0:17:29.600
<v Speaker 1>going to stare at cross poles, at crosstabs and polls,

0:17:29.960 --> 0:17:32.080
<v Speaker 1>that's who you want to look at. How are black

0:17:32.160 --> 0:17:35.200
<v Speaker 1>voters in the South considering who are they voting for

0:17:36.000 --> 0:17:38.879
<v Speaker 1>right now? They really do like Kamala Harris still because

0:17:38.920 --> 0:17:42.080
<v Speaker 1>she was the nominee, she's a black woman. We'll see

0:17:42.119 --> 0:17:44.440
<v Speaker 1>if they find favor or of love with anybody else,

0:17:44.440 --> 0:17:46.600
<v Speaker 1>but right now, according to the most recent pole, there's

0:17:46.640 --> 0:17:49.280
<v Speaker 1>been no polls in South Carolina, but according to the

0:17:49.320 --> 0:17:52.760
<v Speaker 1>most recent nationwide poles, thirty six percent of black voters

0:17:52.760 --> 0:17:55.159
<v Speaker 1>say Kamala Harris and if she holds true that she

0:17:55.200 --> 0:17:58.000
<v Speaker 1>could absolutely be the nominee. Again with me to discuss

0:17:58.040 --> 0:18:00.480
<v Speaker 1>all things twenty twenty eight is the great journal us

0:18:00.520 --> 0:18:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Mark Apprin that's coming up with me to discuss the

0:18:06.480 --> 0:18:09.720
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty eight election is legendary journalist Mark Appron of

0:18:09.920 --> 0:18:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Next up with Mark Auburn and Chwo Way Fame. Thank

0:18:13.600 --> 0:18:14.560
<v Speaker 1>you so much for coming on.

0:18:14.520 --> 0:18:17.159
<v Speaker 2>Mark, honor to be here, sir, Thank you for inkluing

0:18:17.240 --> 0:18:17.560
<v Speaker 2>so Mark.

0:18:17.600 --> 0:18:20.040
<v Speaker 1>The question I get all the time, and I had

0:18:20.160 --> 0:18:23.439
<v Speaker 1>asked literally once a week is is JD. Vance inevitable?

0:18:24.800 --> 0:18:26.160
<v Speaker 1>What is your opinion on that?

0:18:26.800 --> 0:18:29.520
<v Speaker 2>I thought he was, and now I don't. I think

0:18:29.600 --> 0:18:32.480
<v Speaker 2>the three things have happened and make him short of inevitable.

0:18:32.480 --> 0:18:35.680
<v Speaker 2>He's still the base case, I think. Still the most

0:18:35.760 --> 0:18:39.479
<v Speaker 2>likely outcome, probably still by far, is that he decides

0:18:39.520 --> 0:18:42.040
<v Speaker 2>to run, the President endorses him, and he's the nominee

0:18:42.359 --> 0:18:46.040
<v Speaker 2>by consensus and probably runs with Marco Rubio. But three

0:18:46.040 --> 0:18:48.280
<v Speaker 2>things have happened. First of all, the rise of Rubio,

0:18:48.560 --> 0:18:52.080
<v Speaker 2>just the groundswell of interest in in and support of him,

0:18:52.119 --> 0:18:55.440
<v Speaker 2>and the belief amongst many stakeholders that Rubio would be

0:18:55.520 --> 0:19:00.280
<v Speaker 2>a better nominee is pretty big. So that's number one.

0:19:00.440 --> 0:19:03.600
<v Speaker 2>Number two, Vance has rubbed some people the wrong way,

0:19:04.080 --> 0:19:06.920
<v Speaker 2>and his public appearances and his private meetings with donors.

0:19:07.400 --> 0:19:10.639
<v Speaker 2>He's just went from a run of nine months or

0:19:10.680 --> 0:19:14.000
<v Speaker 2>so of extreme popularity and being extremely well received, and

0:19:14.040 --> 0:19:17.760
<v Speaker 2>now some people having questions about his personality and about

0:19:18.080 --> 0:19:22.199
<v Speaker 2>his failure to repudiate people like Tucker Carlson, so some

0:19:22.320 --> 0:19:26.320
<v Speaker 2>doubts about him. And then, lastly, as it's become a

0:19:26.480 --> 0:19:29.399
<v Speaker 2>kind of a possibility that it won't be Vance, whether

0:19:29.440 --> 0:19:33.200
<v Speaker 2>Ted Cruz runs or other people run, just a sentiment

0:19:33.240 --> 0:19:35.240
<v Speaker 2>of he needs to earn this, that it wouldn't be

0:19:35.240 --> 0:19:37.800
<v Speaker 2>in the party's interest, and it wouldn't be right to

0:19:37.880 --> 0:19:40.240
<v Speaker 2>simply hand him the nomination, and that there should be

0:19:40.760 --> 0:19:43.720
<v Speaker 2>whatever needs to happen to make it a competitive process

0:19:43.840 --> 0:19:46.480
<v Speaker 2>needs to happen. So those three things have combined to

0:19:46.560 --> 0:19:49.040
<v Speaker 2>make me pull back from my view that it was

0:19:49.080 --> 0:19:50.359
<v Speaker 2>a mortal locke for Vance.

0:19:50.920 --> 0:19:52.639
<v Speaker 1>Well, I mean, Ted Cruz is going to run no

0:19:52.680 --> 0:19:54.760
<v Speaker 1>matter what. Ted Cruz thinks that he's got a contract

0:19:54.800 --> 0:19:56.760
<v Speaker 1>with Jesus Christ to be president one day. That is,

0:19:56.960 --> 0:20:00.960
<v Speaker 1>you know this vision from above. I don't care who's

0:20:01.040 --> 0:20:03.080
<v Speaker 1>running with Siza, and there's other people who want to run.

0:20:03.080 --> 0:20:05.000
<v Speaker 1>I know Ron de Santas has made phone calls. I

0:20:05.080 --> 0:20:07.359
<v Speaker 1>know that Brian Camp has made phone calls. There are

0:20:07.400 --> 0:20:09.720
<v Speaker 1>people who have that dream of the presidency hasn't loss

0:20:09.800 --> 0:20:12.720
<v Speaker 1>upon him. But there is a belief among people in

0:20:12.800 --> 0:20:15.879
<v Speaker 1>Vance camp that there shouldn't that the vice president shouldn't

0:20:15.880 --> 0:20:17.679
<v Speaker 1>even be on a debate stage with anybody else, that

0:20:17.680 --> 0:20:21.240
<v Speaker 1>he should be running by himself. Is that you think

0:20:21.320 --> 0:20:23.920
<v Speaker 1>the wrong opinion to make among Republican voters.

0:20:25.400 --> 0:20:28.000
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's a long time before voters have a say

0:20:28.000 --> 0:20:29.800
<v Speaker 2>in this, and I think I still think that there's

0:20:29.840 --> 0:20:32.199
<v Speaker 2>a chance to Mansel decide with his young children not

0:20:32.240 --> 0:20:35.159
<v Speaker 2>to run. I just wouldn't rule that out. But if

0:20:35.200 --> 0:20:37.800
<v Speaker 2>he decides to run, I find it hard to believe

0:20:37.800 --> 0:20:40.480
<v Speaker 2>that he wouldn't get the president's endorsement. And then the

0:20:40.560 --> 0:20:43.159
<v Speaker 2>question is, is the RNC finance share, which is a

0:20:43.440 --> 0:20:46.560
<v Speaker 2>unique slot, would be given to an incumbent vice president

0:20:46.560 --> 0:20:50.199
<v Speaker 2>with presidential ambitions as someone who still retains an extraordinary

0:20:50.280 --> 0:20:53.000
<v Speaker 2>amount of goodwill within the party is the front runner

0:20:53.000 --> 0:20:55.800
<v Speaker 2>in the polls. I think he'd win every element of

0:20:55.840 --> 0:20:59.680
<v Speaker 2>the invisible primary well before any votes were cast, So

0:21:02.400 --> 0:21:04.680
<v Speaker 2>that's what would lead him to get Trump's endorsement. And

0:21:04.760 --> 0:21:07.879
<v Speaker 2>I think to largely clear the field again, well before

0:21:07.920 --> 0:21:12.840
<v Speaker 2>anybody voter to voters, to voters eventually, if he refused

0:21:12.880 --> 0:21:15.920
<v Speaker 2>to debate, if he didn't clear the field, would they care? Maybe?

0:21:16.280 --> 0:21:18.520
<v Speaker 2>But I think the question will largely be answered before

0:21:18.640 --> 0:21:19.320
<v Speaker 2>voters cast.

0:21:19.680 --> 0:21:22.760
<v Speaker 1>Why is van Why is Trump asking about Rubio all

0:21:22.760 --> 0:21:25.160
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden? Does does Trump all of a sudden

0:21:25.240 --> 0:21:27.240
<v Speaker 1>have a feeling like he's not as strong or that

0:21:27.440 --> 0:21:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Rubio is so great?

0:21:29.640 --> 0:21:33.119
<v Speaker 2>I'm an expert in politics and campaigns and government, not

0:21:33.200 --> 0:21:37.359
<v Speaker 2>in psychology, but I'll do my best. I think he

0:21:37.920 --> 0:21:40.639
<v Speaker 2>you know, he loves central casting, you know the concept

0:21:40.720 --> 0:21:43.359
<v Speaker 2>of central casting. He loves people who do well on TV,

0:21:43.480 --> 0:21:47.239
<v Speaker 2>and he's fascinated by kind of an anthropology. Right, So

0:21:47.280 --> 0:21:49.600
<v Speaker 2>I think he thinks it's interesting how often he hears

0:21:49.640 --> 0:21:52.480
<v Speaker 2>from people at mar A Lago and members of Congress

0:21:52.480 --> 0:21:55.119
<v Speaker 2>and people reporters who he talks to. I have Rubio

0:21:55.200 --> 0:21:57.600
<v Speaker 2>is kind of awesome? Is in Rubyo asome? He thinks, well,

0:21:57.600 --> 0:21:59.959
<v Speaker 2>that's interesting. Why are people talking so much about how

0:22:00.040 --> 0:22:03.440
<v Speaker 2>awesome Rubio is? Then I think, you know, as much

0:22:03.480 --> 0:22:07.520
<v Speaker 2>as he may want to anoint Vance, eventually, you know,

0:22:07.600 --> 0:22:10.399
<v Speaker 2>he likes competition. He likes to put scorpions in a

0:22:10.400 --> 0:22:12.520
<v Speaker 2>bottle and or you know, go to the Bronx to

0:22:12.960 --> 0:22:16.520
<v Speaker 2>a cock fight and see people hammer each other, and

0:22:16.560 --> 0:22:20.160
<v Speaker 2>then you know, again he's a pretty sophisticated TV producer.

0:22:20.480 --> 0:22:23.720
<v Speaker 2>He sees what I see, which is Vance has had

0:22:23.720 --> 0:22:27.440
<v Speaker 2>some less than surefooted moments in public and Rubio has

0:22:27.480 --> 0:22:30.920
<v Speaker 2>not of late. So probably all those things just make

0:22:31.000 --> 0:22:33.320
<v Speaker 2>him want to make mischief. And he knows that even

0:22:33.359 --> 0:22:36.400
<v Speaker 2>if he's his thought is you know, if I'm right

0:22:36.440 --> 0:22:39.600
<v Speaker 2>then eventually he's going to endorse Vance. There's no cost

0:22:39.680 --> 0:22:41.879
<v Speaker 2>to doing this now, and probably he sees an upside

0:22:41.880 --> 0:22:44.639
<v Speaker 2>that Advance should have some competition, because if he endorsed

0:22:44.680 --> 0:22:46.400
<v Speaker 2>Vance right away, or if he only said nice things

0:22:46.400 --> 0:22:49.760
<v Speaker 2>about Advance, I think he probably believes Vance would get

0:22:49.800 --> 0:22:52.280
<v Speaker 2>to the general election without any sort of test. And

0:22:52.320 --> 0:22:57.159
<v Speaker 2>as you know, often candidates who have rough nomination fights

0:22:57.520 --> 0:23:00.439
<v Speaker 2>go into the general election a lot more battle tested

0:23:00.480 --> 0:23:03.400
<v Speaker 2>and ready for the fight. Then if they if they

0:23:03.520 --> 0:23:04.560
<v Speaker 2>cruise the nomination.

0:23:05.040 --> 0:23:07.840
<v Speaker 1>Also, he does create the situation where he really is

0:23:07.880 --> 0:23:10.919
<v Speaker 1>a lame duck once there's a nominator follow It is

0:23:11.000 --> 0:23:13.960
<v Speaker 1>a certain sight. You know. Steve Bannon once said if

0:23:14.000 --> 0:23:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Trump would be the last president ever, that would be

0:23:15.800 --> 0:23:19.000
<v Speaker 1>his dream like because he really would never want that

0:23:19.040 --> 0:23:22.680
<v Speaker 1>to happen. And then and last part of this before

0:23:22.680 --> 0:23:26.000
<v Speaker 1>we go on is, you know, the Tucker Carlson correlation

0:23:26.160 --> 0:23:29.000
<v Speaker 1>with Vance is what I hear about so often, particularly

0:23:29.000 --> 0:23:33.400
<v Speaker 1>from Jewish friends of mine, Jewish political activist, Jewish donors.

0:23:33.720 --> 0:23:36.840
<v Speaker 1>I think it is really actually haunting him with a

0:23:36.880 --> 0:23:40.320
<v Speaker 1>certain segment of the population that can't be understated. I mean,

0:23:40.400 --> 0:23:42.920
<v Speaker 1>it's it's real, like, it's not fake. Anymore. I believe

0:23:42.920 --> 0:23:44.680
<v Speaker 1>things are fake until I've heard it a million times.

0:23:44.680 --> 0:23:46.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, Okay, maybe it's real, but I do believe

0:23:46.880 --> 0:23:47.359
<v Speaker 1>it's real.

0:23:48.080 --> 0:23:51.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, no way, it's for them, it's a question of

0:23:51.400 --> 0:23:54.199
<v Speaker 2>character and values, and I think for some of them

0:23:54.240 --> 0:23:57.120
<v Speaker 2>it's a question of competence. They just they think it's

0:23:57.119 --> 0:24:00.360
<v Speaker 2>a no brainer to distance from Tucker. And and it's

0:24:00.400 --> 0:24:04.880
<v Speaker 2>not just Tucker. You know, those those college Republicans who

0:24:04.920 --> 0:24:07.400
<v Speaker 2>had the text chain where they you know, made jokes

0:24:07.400 --> 0:24:11.240
<v Speaker 2>about Hitler some other people in MAGA, like the Vice

0:24:11.280 --> 0:24:13.919
<v Speaker 2>president's attitude is seems to be in kind of a

0:24:14.840 --> 0:24:18.560
<v Speaker 2>I would say, almost childish way, is to be like, ah,

0:24:18.640 --> 0:24:20.720
<v Speaker 2>I'm not going to repudiate people just because people tell

0:24:20.720 --> 0:24:24.120
<v Speaker 2>me to repudiate people without regard to well, like would

0:24:24.119 --> 0:24:30.800
<v Speaker 2>you repudiate you know, Osama bid Laden, right, so so

0:24:30.800 --> 0:24:32.879
<v Speaker 2>so I totally agree with you that I hear it

0:24:32.920 --> 0:24:35.639
<v Speaker 2>all the time. And like I said, it's not just

0:24:35.720 --> 0:24:37.920
<v Speaker 2>that it kind of rubs them the wrong way from

0:24:37.960 --> 0:24:42.720
<v Speaker 2>a from a you know, like a political point of view.

0:24:42.920 --> 0:24:45.439
<v Speaker 2>Really they think it speaks to his values, and of

0:24:45.440 --> 0:24:47.720
<v Speaker 2>course it plays into the doubts that a lot of

0:24:47.720 --> 0:24:49.760
<v Speaker 2>people have had about him. Over the course of his

0:24:49.840 --> 0:24:52.359
<v Speaker 2>time in public life that he went from saying Trump

0:24:52.440 --> 0:24:54.760
<v Speaker 2>was the Republican Parties Hitler to saying Trump was the

0:24:54.800 --> 0:24:57.480
<v Speaker 2>greatest president of all time. And they just some people

0:24:57.520 --> 0:25:01.160
<v Speaker 2>seeing him a phony and a person and without values

0:25:01.200 --> 0:25:03.840
<v Speaker 2>and without a north Star. And the Tucker stuff plays

0:25:03.840 --> 0:25:05.639
<v Speaker 2>into that for a lot of people, not just Jews,

0:25:05.640 --> 0:25:06.560
<v Speaker 2>but a lot of Jews.

0:25:06.800 --> 0:25:09.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it is a lot of yeah. Okay. So on

0:25:09.080 --> 0:25:11.960
<v Speaker 1>the Democratic side, Mark has this great ranking. I watch

0:25:12.000 --> 0:25:13.840
<v Speaker 1>it every time you post a new one on the

0:25:13.840 --> 0:25:16.240
<v Speaker 1>Democratic primary. Who is the most likely to get it?

0:25:16.280 --> 0:25:18.399
<v Speaker 1>Who's not his the least likely to get it. You

0:25:18.480 --> 0:25:22.400
<v Speaker 1>have been famously bearish on Gavin Newsom for a very

0:25:22.440 --> 0:25:25.919
<v Speaker 1>long time until recently. You are extremely bullish though on

0:25:26.000 --> 0:25:28.439
<v Speaker 1>Rama Manual, in my opinion, much more so than I

0:25:28.480 --> 0:25:32.919
<v Speaker 1>would I really you speak very favorably about his possibility

0:25:33.000 --> 0:25:33.920
<v Speaker 1>of him being nominated.

0:25:34.040 --> 0:25:38.840
<v Speaker 2>Truly, my sources do, and I report what they say.

0:25:39.119 --> 0:25:41.199
<v Speaker 2>I think there's a very small chance of his being

0:25:41.240 --> 0:25:45.879
<v Speaker 2>the nomination, probably none except if except if lots of

0:25:45.920 --> 0:25:50.399
<v Speaker 2>people don't run and the establishment just gathers random think that.

0:25:50.600 --> 0:25:53.720
<v Speaker 2>I think his record with one of your favorite groups

0:25:53.720 --> 0:25:58.040
<v Speaker 2>of teachers unions in Chicago. I think is his lack

0:25:58.080 --> 0:26:01.760
<v Speaker 2>of bedside manner. I think is being Jewish, being short,

0:26:02.080 --> 0:26:06.040
<v Speaker 2>I think being I think, he said opposition researchers dream. No,

0:26:06.640 --> 0:26:09.199
<v Speaker 2>I'm sorry, I gave you the wrong impression. He's on

0:26:09.240 --> 0:26:12.040
<v Speaker 2>my list of eight because of such a weak field

0:26:12.440 --> 0:26:15.280
<v Speaker 2>and because he does have so much support for the establishment,

0:26:15.320 --> 0:26:18.040
<v Speaker 2>and under certain circumstances, I believe he could be endorsed

0:26:18.080 --> 0:26:20.760
<v Speaker 2>by both Barack Obama and Bill Clinton, which for a

0:26:20.800 --> 0:26:24.000
<v Speaker 2>lot of voters could make a difference. Endorsements really do.

0:26:24.080 --> 0:26:26.520
<v Speaker 2>But I think those might, So I'm not bullish on

0:26:26.640 --> 0:26:31.800
<v Speaker 2>him at all. I'm aware though that a lot of

0:26:31.800 --> 0:26:34.280
<v Speaker 2>my sources are what in your.

0:26:34.119 --> 0:26:38.440
<v Speaker 1>Opinion, because I said, this is my monologue. The calendar

0:26:38.600 --> 0:26:41.720
<v Speaker 1>is very important. If South Carolina goes first, black women

0:26:41.880 --> 0:26:46.720
<v Speaker 1>in the South play an extraordinarily. You know, their vote really, really,

0:26:46.800 --> 0:26:48.919
<v Speaker 1>really matters, and they are the vote that say Bill Clinton,

0:26:48.960 --> 0:26:52.480
<v Speaker 1>Barack Obama and Joe Biden. Who is playing to the

0:26:52.560 --> 0:26:55.399
<v Speaker 1>progressive base, who lives in New Hampshire and Vermont, and

0:26:55.400 --> 0:26:58.280
<v Speaker 1>who is playing to black women in the Deep South

0:26:58.400 --> 0:27:00.280
<v Speaker 1>and playing them strong because it's a complete at least

0:27:00.280 --> 0:27:01.160
<v Speaker 1>out of different values.

0:27:01.960 --> 0:27:06.719
<v Speaker 2>Well, yes and no, I mean in this field, in

0:27:06.760 --> 0:27:09.840
<v Speaker 2>this Republican in this Democratic Party. I don't know that

0:27:09.840 --> 0:27:13.280
<v Speaker 2>that's some sort of like existential choice between the two.

0:27:13.480 --> 0:27:17.440
<v Speaker 2>I think right now at this phase, at least, what voters,

0:27:17.480 --> 0:27:20.520
<v Speaker 2>whether they're Bernie Sanders, you know, living on the New

0:27:20.520 --> 0:27:24.320
<v Speaker 2>Hampshire border Vermont border in New Hampshire, or whether they're

0:27:24.600 --> 0:27:26.840
<v Speaker 2>you know, seventy year old black women who vote regularly

0:27:26.840 --> 0:27:29.240
<v Speaker 2>in South Carolina. They want someone who'll stand up to Trump.

0:27:29.240 --> 0:27:31.400
<v Speaker 2>They want someone who's got energy, they want someone who

0:27:31.840 --> 0:27:34.639
<v Speaker 2>seems to be able to bridge the divides within the

0:27:34.640 --> 0:27:38.760
<v Speaker 2>party and within the country. So I think I unlike

0:27:38.880 --> 0:27:41.320
<v Speaker 2>some past cycles, and again partly it's because the calendar

0:27:41.400 --> 0:27:43.760
<v Speaker 2>is unsettled, and partly because of the fields so weak.

0:27:44.680 --> 0:27:48.080
<v Speaker 2>I don't see lots of specialization in terms of either

0:27:48.080 --> 0:27:51.360
<v Speaker 2>demographics or giagrit geography. At this point, I think everybody

0:27:51.640 --> 0:27:53.879
<v Speaker 2>is trying to play everywhere and because no one is

0:27:53.920 --> 0:27:59.280
<v Speaker 2>particularly strong you can beat Pete bootagege historically, you know,

0:27:59.359 --> 0:28:02.040
<v Speaker 2>comically with black voters and say I'm going to make

0:28:02.040 --> 0:28:04.240
<v Speaker 2>a play for that, because with the exception of Kamala

0:28:04.240 --> 0:28:07.520
<v Speaker 2>harris'sually no one in the in the potential field who

0:28:07.640 --> 0:28:10.040
<v Speaker 2>has some sort of historic or deep hold on black

0:28:10.040 --> 0:28:10.840
<v Speaker 2>women voters.

0:28:11.240 --> 0:28:13.920
<v Speaker 1>I have told polsters to put a poll in South

0:28:13.960 --> 0:28:16.720
<v Speaker 1>Carolina or in Alabama or wherever where you put Pete

0:28:16.720 --> 0:28:20.000
<v Speaker 1>foota judge up against a fictional Democrat and see who

0:28:20.040 --> 0:28:21.960
<v Speaker 1>polls higher with black voters. I would actually like to

0:28:22.000 --> 0:28:24.720
<v Speaker 1>see if, as I bet, it's not Pete Pooter judge.

0:28:25.160 --> 0:28:27.600
<v Speaker 1>But I think that there is. I think there's a

0:28:27.640 --> 0:28:31.160
<v Speaker 1>cautionary tale with Kamala Harris in twenty twenty four where

0:28:31.200 --> 0:28:35.040
<v Speaker 1>she famously said that she would give transgender illegal alliens

0:28:35.080 --> 0:28:37.880
<v Speaker 1>free medical care and it really did actually hurt her

0:28:37.920 --> 0:28:41.720
<v Speaker 1>base with progress with with regular voters and for the

0:28:41.840 --> 0:28:44.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, love of progressives that she did'ed up getting. Anyway,

0:28:45.960 --> 0:28:49.800
<v Speaker 1>is there caution exists today at all? Like, hey, we

0:28:49.880 --> 0:28:51.520
<v Speaker 1>can't go too far to the left. I know Andy

0:28:51.520 --> 0:28:53.440
<v Speaker 1>Basher does it, but does anybody else.

0:28:54.040 --> 0:28:57.520
<v Speaker 2>Well, your favorite candidate Ramamanuel does, Gavin Newsom does it.

0:28:57.920 --> 0:29:02.040
<v Speaker 2>Gavin Newsom does it. Episodically, I think there's part of

0:29:02.080 --> 0:29:04.680
<v Speaker 2>why this is so unsettled, besides again the weakness of

0:29:04.720 --> 0:29:08.760
<v Speaker 2>the field and the lack of DNC sanctioned nominating calendar,

0:29:09.360 --> 0:29:14.320
<v Speaker 2>is there's two variables that if you look at the

0:29:14.440 --> 0:29:17.560
<v Speaker 2>elections of twenty sixteen and twenty twenty, you would say

0:29:18.000 --> 0:29:21.280
<v Speaker 2>would be a super source of strength for the Democratic nominee,

0:29:21.280 --> 0:29:23.960
<v Speaker 2>because I believe Sanders, Senator Sanders would have been the

0:29:23.960 --> 0:29:27.040
<v Speaker 2>nominee in sixteen and in twenty if the DNC hadn't

0:29:27.440 --> 0:29:30.280
<v Speaker 2>agreed the rules to keep him from winning. One is

0:29:30.440 --> 0:29:36.320
<v Speaker 2>super progressive, and with the exception of AOC and Rocanna,

0:29:36.720 --> 0:29:38.840
<v Speaker 2>there's no one else in my top lists that are

0:29:38.960 --> 0:29:43.080
<v Speaker 2>super progressive, like single payer, green, new deal, you know

0:29:43.280 --> 0:29:46.160
<v Speaker 2>all that. So that's one, and then the other is

0:29:46.160 --> 0:29:50.440
<v Speaker 2>is sort of a populist outsider that no member of

0:29:50.480 --> 0:29:54.880
<v Speaker 2>Congress except AOC need apply. Even governors might not be

0:29:54.960 --> 0:29:55.960
<v Speaker 2>outsider enough.

0:29:56.240 --> 0:29:56.440
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:29:56.920 --> 0:30:01.040
<v Speaker 2>So it's hard to know because four is not part

0:30:01.080 --> 0:30:03.120
<v Speaker 2>of the sample space because we had an incumbent president

0:30:03.160 --> 0:30:05.719
<v Speaker 2>and then he ended it off to an incumbent vice president.

0:30:06.040 --> 0:30:09.560
<v Speaker 2>But most of the of the fingertip feel my sources

0:30:09.600 --> 0:30:14.440
<v Speaker 2>have and I have for the Democratic Party says a populist,

0:30:14.600 --> 0:30:18.200
<v Speaker 2>super left wing outsider is a good lane. It may

0:30:18.240 --> 0:30:20.640
<v Speaker 2>not win, but it's a good lane. And again I

0:30:20.680 --> 0:30:22.480
<v Speaker 2>don't think AOC will run in the end, and so

0:30:22.880 --> 0:30:26.880
<v Speaker 2>someone has to fill that lane, and I don't see

0:30:26.880 --> 0:30:29.640
<v Speaker 2>it right now. I don't see who that person is.

0:30:30.280 --> 0:30:33.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's funny. Also, thing I'm hearing from Democratic consultants

0:30:33.720 --> 0:30:37.640
<v Speaker 1>and activists is no women. I've heard from multiple Democratics thing,

0:30:37.680 --> 0:30:40.040
<v Speaker 1>we are not voting for a woman this time, right.

0:30:40.200 --> 0:30:43.240
<v Speaker 2>So like, you hear no women, you hear no jew,

0:30:43.960 --> 0:30:48.000
<v Speaker 2>you hear no gay, you hear no non white. So

0:30:48.360 --> 0:30:50.960
<v Speaker 2>that doesn't leave a lot of people. That leaves Gavity, Newsom,

0:30:51.120 --> 0:30:52.160
<v Speaker 2>and Andy to be sheer.

0:30:52.640 --> 0:30:54.840
<v Speaker 1>For the most part, I do not believe that that

0:30:54.960 --> 0:30:57.440
<v Speaker 1>Joshapiro conversation happened where they accused him of being an

0:30:57.480 --> 0:30:59.080
<v Speaker 1>age or asked me he was an agent for Israel.

0:30:59.080 --> 0:31:00.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't believe that happened whatsoever.

0:31:02.040 --> 0:31:04.800
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I don't know. I'm agnostic on that, but

0:31:04.840 --> 0:31:07.520
<v Speaker 2>I just don't think that that that that specific or

0:31:07.520 --> 0:31:10.120
<v Speaker 2>the general question of whether he makes stuff up or

0:31:10.200 --> 0:31:12.520
<v Speaker 2>very big problems compared to most of the other candidates.

0:31:12.760 --> 0:31:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Well, yeah, that's true. Okay, So if you had your ranking, now,

0:31:16.040 --> 0:31:18.800
<v Speaker 1>who is the top person who is leading the field?

0:31:18.960 --> 0:31:21.240
<v Speaker 1>The weak field, that, mind you, but the leading field.

0:31:21.480 --> 0:31:23.800
<v Speaker 2>I think Newsome and Shapiro are head and shoulders above

0:31:23.840 --> 0:31:26.400
<v Speaker 2>everyone else. But I don't think Newsom's going to make

0:31:26.400 --> 0:31:28.560
<v Speaker 2>it to the starting line in the end, and I

0:31:28.560 --> 0:31:32.120
<v Speaker 2>think Shapiro has massive flaws. But I also don't believe

0:31:32.120 --> 0:31:34.360
<v Speaker 2>in this white Night theory that somebody's surprising is going

0:31:34.440 --> 0:31:38.600
<v Speaker 2>to come through. So my current, my current bet is

0:31:38.600 --> 0:31:42.360
<v Speaker 2>is it's going to be bootages, as implausible as that is,

0:31:42.440 --> 0:31:46.360
<v Speaker 2>but until until they proved either they're not running or

0:31:46.360 --> 0:31:49.000
<v Speaker 2>they're weak, I think it'd be their Newsom or Shapiro.

0:31:49.320 --> 0:31:53.400
<v Speaker 1>I literally guessed that is that is that is a

0:31:53.440 --> 0:31:55.960
<v Speaker 1>hot take. If you could compare this field, as a

0:31:55.960 --> 0:31:58.600
<v Speaker 1>student of history, compare this field to any other previous

0:31:58.640 --> 0:32:00.600
<v Speaker 1>primary which one would it be? Is this like two

0:32:00.640 --> 0:32:03.080
<v Speaker 1>thousand and four, two thousand and I don't even know.

0:32:03.200 --> 0:32:06.120
<v Speaker 2>Nineteen two two thousand and four was a pretty weak field,

0:32:06.120 --> 0:32:08.280
<v Speaker 2>but I think this is currently the weakest field.

0:32:08.440 --> 0:32:10.880
<v Speaker 1>Well, Mark Halpern, thank you so much. Where they'll go

0:32:10.920 --> 0:32:13.000
<v Speaker 1>to read all your stuff, listening to you. Your shows

0:32:13.000 --> 0:32:15.160
<v Speaker 1>are always must watching my household.

0:32:15.400 --> 0:32:19.120
<v Speaker 2>I appreciate that. Next up on YouTube or two way

0:32:19.600 --> 0:32:22.520
<v Speaker 2>dot tv, you can find some of my content there.

0:32:22.560 --> 0:32:23.160
<v Speaker 2>That's plenty.

0:32:23.760 --> 0:32:24.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, thank you so much.

0:32:25.120 --> 0:32:26.560
<v Speaker 2>Okay, thank you, great to see you.

0:32:30.080 --> 0:32:31.800
<v Speaker 1>Now it's time for the Ask Me Anything segment. If

0:32:31.800 --> 0:32:33.880
<v Speaker 1>you want to be part of the Ask Me Anything segment,

0:32:33.920 --> 0:32:36.600
<v Speaker 1>ent me Ryan at Numbers gamepodcast dot com. That's Ryan

0:32:36.640 --> 0:32:39.720
<v Speaker 1>at numbers Ploural Numbers gamepodcast dot com. This question comes

0:32:39.720 --> 0:32:42.440
<v Speaker 1>from my buddy Peter Fomo. He says, if the sayback passes,

0:32:42.480 --> 0:32:44.640
<v Speaker 1>what is your opinion on whether or not it will

0:32:44.640 --> 0:32:47.760
<v Speaker 1>help Republicans. I assume it will help, but my concerns

0:32:47.760 --> 0:32:49.960
<v Speaker 1>are Republican the lower pencity voters may not get the

0:32:50.000 --> 0:32:55.040
<v Speaker 1>effort to register. Maybe I mean it affects new registrations

0:32:55.080 --> 0:32:59.680
<v Speaker 1>on existing ones. I think it will have a minimal effect.

0:33:00.080 --> 0:33:03.200
<v Speaker 1>Where I think it could have a large effect. The

0:33:03.280 --> 0:33:05.080
<v Speaker 1>place is going to have the biggest effect is in

0:33:05.200 --> 0:33:09.600
<v Speaker 1>states with automatic voter registration, so among Spring State's places

0:33:09.800 --> 0:33:14.760
<v Speaker 1>like Pennsylvania, Nevada, and Georgia. In Georgia, I think you

0:33:14.760 --> 0:33:17.400
<v Speaker 1>will actually help Republicans a lot a lot of lober pencany,

0:33:17.400 --> 0:33:20.520
<v Speaker 1>mostly black voters who do turn out for Joe Biden,

0:33:20.560 --> 0:33:23.440
<v Speaker 1>who turn out for Stacy Abrams, who turn out for

0:33:24.040 --> 0:33:27.880
<v Speaker 1>any Democrat. They will likely not be able to automatically

0:33:27.880 --> 0:33:29.760
<v Speaker 1>get voter registration, which means they have to do the

0:33:29.800 --> 0:33:31.960
<v Speaker 1>work and not just show up on election day, which

0:33:31.960 --> 0:33:35.400
<v Speaker 1>would probably decrease voter turnout among that population. But it's

0:33:35.400 --> 0:33:38.760
<v Speaker 1>going to be very small, my bet, and I don't

0:33:38.760 --> 0:33:41.720
<v Speaker 1>think it's going to necessarily change the economy too much.

0:33:41.800 --> 0:33:43.400
<v Speaker 1>I would guess if I had to put up money

0:33:43.440 --> 0:33:47.920
<v Speaker 1>a where it helps Republicans, it will affect automatic voter registration,

0:33:48.120 --> 0:33:54.160
<v Speaker 1>and that will impede probably automatic registration in states that

0:33:54.800 --> 0:33:58.960
<v Speaker 1>in states with large populations of lower pensity Democratic voters

0:33:59.040 --> 0:34:02.520
<v Speaker 1>like Nevada and Georgia. That's my guess. We'll see, we'll

0:34:02.520 --> 0:34:04.480
<v Speaker 1>see if it even passes. I mean, they're coming up

0:34:04.520 --> 0:34:06.080
<v Speaker 1>to a problem and I will leave some Rokowski not

0:34:06.120 --> 0:34:10.000
<v Speaker 1>supporting it, so who knows. I mean, it's gonna be

0:34:10.200 --> 0:34:11.640
<v Speaker 1>by the skin of their teeth that they get this

0:34:11.719 --> 0:34:14.600
<v Speaker 1>thing through. We'll have to wait to see. Anyway. That's

0:34:14.600 --> 0:34:16.840
<v Speaker 1>this episode. If you like this podcast, please like and

0:34:16.920 --> 0:34:19.279
<v Speaker 1>subscribe on the iHeartRadio app, Apple podcast where to get

0:34:19.320 --> 0:34:21.840
<v Speaker 1>your podcast, and I will talk to you guys on Friday. Bye.