WEBVTT - Slaying the Trolls with Nefertiti Walker and David Berri

0:00:00.680 --> 0:00:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Good Game with Sarah Spain, where we're knee

0:00:03.040 --> 0:00:06.519
<v Speaker 1>deep in Sangria, croquettas and patatas bravs.

0:00:07.040 --> 0:00:08.959
<v Speaker 2>That's right, we're topis over here.

0:00:09.200 --> 0:00:11.600
<v Speaker 1>It's Monday, November eighteenth, and while Alex and I are

0:00:11.600 --> 0:00:14.320
<v Speaker 1>getting settled in Spain for the VJK Cup, we're focusing

0:00:14.360 --> 0:00:14.840
<v Speaker 1>the show on.

0:00:14.800 --> 0:00:16.759
<v Speaker 2>An interview with the authors of the books.

0:00:16.440 --> 0:00:19.599
<v Speaker 1>Slaying the Trolls, Why the Trolls are very very wrong

0:00:19.880 --> 0:00:22.919
<v Speaker 1>about women in Sports, the Great Nefert, D Walker, and

0:00:23.000 --> 0:00:25.479
<v Speaker 1>David Barry. Before the interview, I want to tread you

0:00:25.560 --> 0:00:27.520
<v Speaker 1>the blurb I wrote for this book, and I think

0:00:27.520 --> 0:00:29.360
<v Speaker 1>this book might be a very useful tool in the

0:00:29.440 --> 0:00:31.720
<v Speaker 1>arsenal of all use slices out there fighting the good fight.

0:00:32.040 --> 0:00:33.440
<v Speaker 2>So here you go. I wrote.

0:00:33.479 --> 0:00:35.760
<v Speaker 1>It can be difficult to move on from said ideas,

0:00:35.800 --> 0:00:39.000
<v Speaker 1>stereotypes and talking points if we aren't fully educated on

0:00:39.080 --> 0:00:41.160
<v Speaker 1>how we arrived at them and how things have changed,

0:00:41.320 --> 0:00:43.360
<v Speaker 1>which is why a book like this is so important.

0:00:43.680 --> 0:00:46.920
<v Speaker 1>Centuries of societal bias have created heuristics around women's sports

0:00:46.920 --> 0:00:50.640
<v Speaker 1>that are not only inaccurate and harmful to female athletes, leagues,

0:00:50.680 --> 0:00:52.960
<v Speaker 1>and fans of women's sport, but They also keep people

0:00:52.960 --> 0:00:55.480
<v Speaker 1>from making a lot of money off a very viable product.

0:00:55.840 --> 0:00:58.120
<v Speaker 1>In no other business do we reject or refuse to

0:00:58.160 --> 0:01:01.680
<v Speaker 1>capitalize on multimillion dollar profit and rocket ship growth. We

0:01:01.800 --> 0:01:04.120
<v Speaker 1>do that in women's sports, not just due to ignorance,

0:01:04.360 --> 0:01:06.959
<v Speaker 1>but because of an unequal and unfair system that was

0:01:07.000 --> 0:01:10.319
<v Speaker 1>actually built with intention. The authors recognize all the ways

0:01:10.319 --> 0:01:12.399
<v Speaker 1>women's sports have been held back, and they see the

0:01:12.440 --> 0:01:17.120
<v Speaker 1>incredible growth and profit that could happen if we actually invested, supported, watched,

0:01:17.120 --> 0:01:20.160
<v Speaker 1>and understood the product. This book will not only slay

0:01:20.200 --> 0:01:23.959
<v Speaker 1>the trolls, but educate the masses, and Nef and David

0:01:23.959 --> 0:01:33.000
<v Speaker 1>will educate us all. Coming up next, it's time for

0:01:33.000 --> 0:01:35.400
<v Speaker 1>another group chat where we take the t from the

0:01:35.440 --> 0:01:37.240
<v Speaker 1>text and put it on the airwaves.

0:01:37.319 --> 0:01:37.840
<v Speaker 2>Joining us.

0:01:37.840 --> 0:01:40.800
<v Speaker 1>She's the Deputy VP for Academic Affairs Student Affairs at

0:01:40.840 --> 0:01:44.120
<v Speaker 1>Equity for the University of Massachusetts, a tenured full professor

0:01:44.160 --> 0:01:46.640
<v Speaker 1>in the Department of Sport Management, and a social scientist

0:01:46.720 --> 0:01:49.800
<v Speaker 1>who studies organizational culture. She's a Research Fellow with the

0:01:49.800 --> 0:01:52.640
<v Speaker 1>North American Society for Sport Management, signifying the top ten

0:01:52.680 --> 0:01:55.960
<v Speaker 1>percent of researchers in her field. A former NCAAD one

0:01:56.000 --> 0:01:59.000
<v Speaker 1>basketball player, at Georgia Tech and Stetson and was inducted

0:01:59.000 --> 0:02:00.800
<v Speaker 1>into the Stetson UA Hall of Fame.

0:02:00.920 --> 0:02:02.880
<v Speaker 2>It's Nef for TD Walker. What's up, Nef?

0:02:03.440 --> 0:02:05.760
<v Speaker 3>How are you? Sarah? Good to be here, Thanks for having.

0:02:05.520 --> 0:02:08.000
<v Speaker 2>Me, Thanks for coming on joining her.

0:02:08.080 --> 0:02:11.080
<v Speaker 1>He's a professor of economics at Southern Utah University who

0:02:11.160 --> 0:02:13.840
<v Speaker 1>has spent the last two decades researching sports and economics.

0:02:13.840 --> 0:02:15.600
<v Speaker 1>He's the lead author of the books The Wages of

0:02:15.639 --> 0:02:19.119
<v Speaker 1>Wins and Stumbling On Wins, the sole author of Sports Economics,

0:02:19.160 --> 0:02:21.600
<v Speaker 1>and a co author of the Economics of the Super Bowl.

0:02:21.720 --> 0:02:23.160
<v Speaker 2>He's been part of more than eighty.

0:02:22.960 --> 0:02:25.560
<v Speaker 1>Academic papers published on the subject of sports economics, and

0:02:25.560 --> 0:02:28.000
<v Speaker 1>has written for a number of popular outlets, including The

0:02:28.040 --> 0:02:30.839
<v Speaker 1>New York Times, The Atlantic, Time, dot Com, Forbes, and more.

0:02:30.919 --> 0:02:32.680
<v Speaker 2>It's David Barry, what's up, David?

0:02:33.160 --> 0:02:35.839
<v Speaker 4>What's up with you? Sarah? Thanks for having me.

0:02:36.720 --> 0:02:39.280
<v Speaker 2>You know, living the dream is what I tell myself

0:02:39.280 --> 0:02:40.920
<v Speaker 2>every day. It's got to be somebody's dream.

0:02:41.320 --> 0:02:41.680
<v Speaker 1>Uh.

0:02:41.680 --> 0:02:43.160
<v Speaker 2>Thank you both for coming on.

0:02:43.480 --> 0:02:45.720
<v Speaker 1>They are the co authors of the books Slaying the

0:02:45.720 --> 0:02:48.760
<v Speaker 1>Trolls Why the Trolls Are Very Very Wrong About Women

0:02:48.840 --> 0:02:52.320
<v Speaker 1>and Sports, which provides the arguments and the empirical evidence

0:02:52.320 --> 0:02:55.600
<v Speaker 1>to demonstrate why responding to women sports news with nobody.

0:02:55.240 --> 0:02:57.519
<v Speaker 2>Cares couldn't be further from the truth.

0:02:57.880 --> 0:03:00.400
<v Speaker 1>The book gives folks the evidence and in photo back

0:03:00.440 --> 0:03:04.000
<v Speaker 1>against outdated sexism and help support the current push for equity,

0:03:04.040 --> 0:03:10.239
<v Speaker 1>investment and respect in women's sports. This book is so needed, Unfortunately,

0:03:10.440 --> 0:03:13.000
<v Speaker 1>more so every day it feels as women's sports is

0:03:13.000 --> 0:03:15.040
<v Speaker 1>going in one direction and the trolls continue to push

0:03:15.040 --> 0:03:17.640
<v Speaker 1>in another. So nef tell me how this book came together.

0:03:18.600 --> 0:03:22.520
<v Speaker 5>Oh gosh, So First, Dave is a really fast writer.

0:03:23.880 --> 0:03:26.880
<v Speaker 5>I am not so much. But the book started because

0:03:27.040 --> 0:03:31.919
<v Speaker 5>Dave and I colleagues writing together doing research together, essentially

0:03:31.960 --> 0:03:35.040
<v Speaker 5>got tired of going on what was then Twitter now

0:03:35.320 --> 0:03:39.280
<v Speaker 5>x and seeing these trolls make really ridiculous comments, not

0:03:39.400 --> 0:03:44.640
<v Speaker 5>fact based comments, based on their small opinions about women's sports,

0:03:45.120 --> 0:03:47.080
<v Speaker 5>and you know, we would go back and forth and

0:03:47.120 --> 0:03:49.000
<v Speaker 5>text about it, we would talk about it when we

0:03:49.040 --> 0:03:52.120
<v Speaker 5>saw each other. We're writing papers, we're talking about it,

0:03:52.120 --> 0:03:54.120
<v Speaker 5>and we just sort of got fed up and was like, Okay,

0:03:54.240 --> 0:03:57.000
<v Speaker 5>what can we do about this. The timing was such

0:03:57.040 --> 0:03:59.480
<v Speaker 5>that it was I believe twenty eighteen when we first

0:03:59.720 --> 0:04:03.400
<v Speaker 5>began discussing the idea of this book, and then we

0:04:03.440 --> 0:04:07.360
<v Speaker 5>started writing. We started, you know, meeting basically weekly and

0:04:07.560 --> 0:04:10.320
<v Speaker 5>just talking about what we saw that week on Twitter,

0:04:11.040 --> 0:04:13.960
<v Speaker 5>following folks like you and your other colleagues, Jamil Hill

0:04:14.000 --> 0:04:16.080
<v Speaker 5>and others, and seeing the ways that you were wasting

0:04:16.120 --> 0:04:19.920
<v Speaker 5>a lot of your very valuable time trying to not

0:04:19.960 --> 0:04:22.240
<v Speaker 5>only you know, call out the trolls, but also provide

0:04:22.240 --> 0:04:24.640
<v Speaker 5>some facts so that you're educating people along the way.

0:04:25.040 --> 0:04:27.200
<v Speaker 5>And we just thought to ourselves, why are they, like

0:04:27.520 --> 0:04:29.520
<v Speaker 5>they need to be doing the really good work that

0:04:29.560 --> 0:04:31.680
<v Speaker 5>they do, Why are they wasting their time with these trolls.

0:04:31.720 --> 0:04:33.440
<v Speaker 3>Can we do something to provide some.

0:04:34.240 --> 0:04:37.680
<v Speaker 5>Tools for folks to be able to respond to trolls

0:04:37.720 --> 0:04:40.159
<v Speaker 5>or at least just have more educated conversations about women's

0:04:40.160 --> 0:04:43.159
<v Speaker 5>sports in general. So that's really that was really the

0:04:43.200 --> 0:04:44.280
<v Speaker 5>genesis of this book.

0:04:45.040 --> 0:04:47.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it does feel like such a waste of time.

0:04:47.400 --> 0:04:49.279
<v Speaker 1>And then on the other hand, I think what we're

0:04:49.279 --> 0:04:52.919
<v Speaker 1>seeing more often now is when research, which is what

0:04:53.040 --> 0:04:56.799
<v Speaker 1>you guys focus in, comes up against ignorance, there isn't

0:04:56.839 --> 0:05:00.760
<v Speaker 1>a great way for people to fully comprehend or vet

0:05:01.000 --> 0:05:03.919
<v Speaker 1>which side is being accurate, right, Like you could go

0:05:03.960 --> 0:05:06.520
<v Speaker 1>to someone's bio and see if maybe it tells you

0:05:06.600 --> 0:05:09.640
<v Speaker 1>something about their expertise and their background and say, well,

0:05:09.680 --> 0:05:11.919
<v Speaker 1>this person probably knows better. But we're also seeing some

0:05:11.960 --> 0:05:15.960
<v Speaker 1>pretty disingenuous people in high places who are feeding misinformation

0:05:16.120 --> 0:05:18.720
<v Speaker 1>with intent. And that is true of things all the

0:05:18.760 --> 0:05:21.000
<v Speaker 1>way up to the presidential race, all the way down

0:05:21.320 --> 0:05:24.000
<v Speaker 1>to things that are just entertaining for us or sports

0:05:24.120 --> 0:05:26.680
<v Speaker 1>right in the middle there. And if I think part

0:05:26.720 --> 0:05:29.359
<v Speaker 1>of that is why you do find folks in my

0:05:29.440 --> 0:05:32.120
<v Speaker 1>position or Jamel or many others in the business who say,

0:05:32.520 --> 0:05:36.160
<v Speaker 1>somebody has to inform, even if a lot of people

0:05:36.160 --> 0:05:39.000
<v Speaker 1>aren't going to pay attention or going to notice, somebody

0:05:39.000 --> 0:05:41.040
<v Speaker 1>has to inform with actual facts. And I imagine as

0:05:41.080 --> 0:05:44.080
<v Speaker 1>someone whose job is research, it's all the more frustrating

0:05:44.480 --> 0:05:47.600
<v Speaker 1>when someone who looks to be or for all intensive

0:05:47.640 --> 0:05:50.360
<v Speaker 1>purposes is on equal footing in a space like X

0:05:50.920 --> 0:05:54.120
<v Speaker 1>can say something that's absolutely false and there's no repercussions,

0:05:54.120 --> 0:05:57.520
<v Speaker 1>there's no accountability, it doesn't really matter. So how did

0:05:57.560 --> 0:06:01.400
<v Speaker 1>you decide which things people were saying or which arguments

0:06:01.400 --> 0:06:04.240
<v Speaker 1>people most often came with that you wanted to address

0:06:04.240 --> 0:06:04.680
<v Speaker 1>in the book.

0:06:05.360 --> 0:06:10.120
<v Speaker 5>So you're exactly right, it's frustrating when you see people

0:06:10.160 --> 0:06:12.960
<v Speaker 5>say these things that aren't rooted in parical research are

0:06:13.080 --> 0:06:17.839
<v Speaker 5>just sometimes common sense. They say it to infuriate folks

0:06:17.839 --> 0:06:21.919
<v Speaker 5>that are deeply involved in women's sports, and it's you know,

0:06:21.920 --> 0:06:24.560
<v Speaker 5>it's frustrating. So part of the reason, and I give

0:06:24.600 --> 0:06:26.840
<v Speaker 5>all credit to Dave. The reason why we wrote this

0:06:26.880 --> 0:06:28.680
<v Speaker 5>book the way we did is because we wanted it

0:06:28.720 --> 0:06:30.920
<v Speaker 5>to be interesting to people, but we also wanted it

0:06:30.960 --> 0:06:33.720
<v Speaker 5>to be able to be read at essentially a fifth

0:06:33.760 --> 0:06:35.560
<v Speaker 5>grade level. If you go to Amazon, it says this

0:06:35.600 --> 0:06:37.479
<v Speaker 5>book is you can it's a fifth grade level. Like,

0:06:37.520 --> 0:06:40.240
<v Speaker 5>we didn't write it for academics. There's research in there,

0:06:40.240 --> 0:06:42.479
<v Speaker 5>but we try to put it in playing terms, and

0:06:42.520 --> 0:06:44.880
<v Speaker 5>we wanted it to be as accessible as possible. So

0:06:44.920 --> 0:06:47.840
<v Speaker 5>I think that was really sort of our way of

0:06:48.000 --> 0:06:49.960
<v Speaker 5>making sure that folks who needed to read this book

0:06:49.960 --> 0:06:51.640
<v Speaker 5>and were interested in it could I think, in addition

0:06:51.680 --> 0:06:53.480
<v Speaker 5>to your question that you asked to get back to

0:06:53.480 --> 0:06:55.800
<v Speaker 5>that it was hard choosing. I mean, you see, the

0:06:55.839 --> 0:06:58.920
<v Speaker 5>book is twenty chapters, right, like, it was very difficult

0:06:59.000 --> 0:07:01.680
<v Speaker 5>for us to choose which stories to write on. And

0:07:01.720 --> 0:07:05.400
<v Speaker 5>I think also because I am a painfully slow writer,

0:07:06.320 --> 0:07:09.360
<v Speaker 5>we just it took so long that we kept adding stories, right,

0:07:09.360 --> 0:07:11.960
<v Speaker 5>I mean weekly, Dave and I are meeting and Dave's like, oh,

0:07:12.040 --> 0:07:13.640
<v Speaker 5>this just happened. We have to put it in the book,

0:07:13.640 --> 0:07:15.920
<v Speaker 5>and I'm like, we don't have space, but we do.

0:07:16.320 --> 0:07:19.560
<v Speaker 5>So we didn't really cut out a whole lot. We

0:07:19.600 --> 0:07:21.280
<v Speaker 5>tried to add all of the stories in there. We

0:07:21.320 --> 0:07:23.120
<v Speaker 5>tried to force them in there, but at the end

0:07:23.160 --> 0:07:25.600
<v Speaker 5>of the day, it was whatever what was most relevant.

0:07:26.120 --> 0:07:28.400
<v Speaker 5>What we saw on X that people were the stories

0:07:28.400 --> 0:07:31.160
<v Speaker 5>that people were sharing that were false, that was rooted

0:07:31.160 --> 0:07:33.440
<v Speaker 5>in data and empirical research that we had access to.

0:07:33.520 --> 0:07:35.880
<v Speaker 5>We prioritize those so that we could tell really good

0:07:35.880 --> 0:07:38.239
<v Speaker 5>stories that were interesting, but also stories that were rooted

0:07:38.280 --> 0:07:39.960
<v Speaker 5>in literature and research.

0:07:40.600 --> 0:07:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Dave, you've been fighting this fight for quite some time.

0:07:43.760 --> 0:07:47.040
<v Speaker 1>You've been alongside me and Jamelle and others on the

0:07:47.080 --> 0:07:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Internet attempting to use facts and research to talk back

0:07:50.600 --> 0:07:54.040
<v Speaker 1>to people who are trying to spread lies. How difficult

0:07:54.200 --> 0:07:59.040
<v Speaker 1>was it to take that mindset of combativeness and marry

0:07:59.040 --> 0:08:03.920
<v Speaker 1>it with your professorial research side that is probably wanting

0:08:03.960 --> 0:08:06.040
<v Speaker 1>to get more into sort of empirical data. How do

0:08:06.080 --> 0:08:08.360
<v Speaker 1>you find that balance, Like NEF just said of like

0:08:08.400 --> 0:08:10.120
<v Speaker 1>getting the information to people in a way that they'll

0:08:10.160 --> 0:08:12.520
<v Speaker 1>understand it, but also knowing how much it matters to

0:08:12.560 --> 0:08:14.880
<v Speaker 1>be able to back that with saying this is facts,

0:08:14.880 --> 0:08:17.440
<v Speaker 1>this is true, this is not subjective opinion.

0:08:17.680 --> 0:08:21.040
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think the advantage I had as an academic

0:08:21.400 --> 0:08:25.160
<v Speaker 4>is when my first book came out, I was asked

0:08:25.160 --> 0:08:28.480
<v Speaker 4>to write for places like The New York Times, and

0:08:28.560 --> 0:08:32.319
<v Speaker 4>I had editors sit me down and I would write

0:08:32.320 --> 0:08:35.440
<v Speaker 4>something and they would say, okay, that nobody knows what

0:08:35.480 --> 0:08:37.800
<v Speaker 4>the hell you're talking about. You can't say it that way.

0:08:38.440 --> 0:08:40.480
<v Speaker 4>I had a New York Times editor tell me once,

0:08:41.000 --> 0:08:43.240
<v Speaker 4>you can't use the word standard deviation. No one knows

0:08:43.280 --> 0:08:43.960
<v Speaker 4>what that means.

0:08:44.240 --> 0:08:46.000
<v Speaker 2>We all learned it, do we all remember?

0:08:46.880 --> 0:08:49.480
<v Speaker 4>Yeah? No, and so, and you know. I had a

0:08:49.559 --> 0:08:52.520
<v Speaker 4>radio host once get very irate because I dare to

0:08:52.600 --> 0:08:56.480
<v Speaker 4>use the word econometrics on air. They were very mad

0:08:56.520 --> 0:09:00.360
<v Speaker 4>about that. They're like, don't say words like that. Rather

0:09:00.440 --> 0:09:03.120
<v Speaker 4>have you swear and have our license revoked, rather than

0:09:03.160 --> 0:09:05.840
<v Speaker 4>have you say things and lose all our audience. So

0:09:06.160 --> 0:09:11.360
<v Speaker 4>I was taught how to write things by by very

0:09:11.400 --> 0:09:14.720
<v Speaker 4>patient editors, and they said, you know, you got it.

0:09:14.800 --> 0:09:17.160
<v Speaker 4>You can't write these things like journal articles or not.

0:09:17.440 --> 0:09:20.720
<v Speaker 4>People don't read things like that. So you learn to

0:09:20.760 --> 0:09:24.160
<v Speaker 4>write things in a way that is accessible. And so

0:09:24.320 --> 0:09:26.240
<v Speaker 4>because the objective is what we're trying to do is

0:09:26.280 --> 0:09:28.360
<v Speaker 4>we're trying to reach out to the fans of women's

0:09:28.360 --> 0:09:31.959
<v Speaker 4>sports who who It just feels when you're on social

0:09:32.000 --> 0:09:35.560
<v Speaker 4>media and they're debating with the trolls, like there's this

0:09:35.559 --> 0:09:38.320
<v Speaker 4>this level of frustration. It's like, I don't I know

0:09:38.360 --> 0:09:41.719
<v Speaker 4>you're wrong, but I don't have the data and I

0:09:41.760 --> 0:09:44.120
<v Speaker 4>don't have the research. It says, hey, you're wrong. I

0:09:44.160 --> 0:09:47.080
<v Speaker 4>just know you're wrong. And so what NEPH and I

0:09:47.080 --> 0:09:50.160
<v Speaker 4>are doing is saying, hey, this is this is how

0:09:50.200 --> 0:09:52.400
<v Speaker 4>you say that, This is how you respond to that

0:09:52.520 --> 0:09:56.679
<v Speaker 4>they say this, but this is why they're wrong, and

0:09:56.679 --> 0:09:58.480
<v Speaker 4>this is how you can respond to them in a

0:09:58.520 --> 0:10:02.119
<v Speaker 4>way that other people can under because really, you're probably

0:10:02.160 --> 0:10:07.160
<v Speaker 4>not going to convert the trolls. That is unrealistic. We don't.

0:10:07.440 --> 0:10:09.960
<v Speaker 4>It's not called the book isn't called converting the trolls.

0:10:09.960 --> 0:10:16.079
<v Speaker 4>It's called we don't Convert them. But it's for it's

0:10:16.120 --> 0:10:18.160
<v Speaker 4>for the fan of women's sports, and then for the

0:10:18.200 --> 0:10:20.880
<v Speaker 4>people who don't really know who's right, and then you

0:10:20.920 --> 0:10:24.160
<v Speaker 4>can say, hey, look look at it this way. Now

0:10:24.160 --> 0:10:26.600
<v Speaker 4>do you understand why that person is wrong? And that's

0:10:26.679 --> 0:10:27.880
<v Speaker 4>kind of where we're going with this.

0:10:28.960 --> 0:10:31.160
<v Speaker 1>That's exactly what I always tell people when they ask

0:10:31.240 --> 0:10:34.160
<v Speaker 1>me how I decide to engage on social media. I

0:10:34.240 --> 0:10:37.079
<v Speaker 1>often say, I wait until there's a bunch of people

0:10:37.120 --> 0:10:38.840
<v Speaker 1>saying the same uninformed thing.

0:10:38.960 --> 0:10:39.600
<v Speaker 2>I pick one.

0:10:39.720 --> 0:10:41.720
<v Speaker 1>I use them as an example to be able to

0:10:41.720 --> 0:10:45.080
<v Speaker 1>shout down whatever they're saying that's wrong headed, with no

0:10:45.200 --> 0:10:48.000
<v Speaker 1>intention usually of expecting them to change their opinion. But

0:10:48.040 --> 0:10:51.680
<v Speaker 1>for everybody in the middle, who's maybe not even posting anything,

0:10:51.720 --> 0:10:54.040
<v Speaker 1>but they're all reading it to see, oh, that's a

0:10:54.040 --> 0:10:57.040
<v Speaker 1>great point, that's actually right, that's wrong. And I've had

0:10:57.080 --> 0:10:58.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people over the years say, I have

0:10:58.960 --> 0:11:01.200
<v Speaker 1>to tell you, when you first started at ESPN one thousand,

0:11:01.280 --> 0:11:03.400
<v Speaker 1>ten years ago, I thought X and Y. But I

0:11:03.440 --> 0:11:05.400
<v Speaker 1>started following you and I read this, and I see this,

0:11:05.480 --> 0:11:07.360
<v Speaker 1>and I hear this, and now I get it, and

0:11:07.400 --> 0:11:08.360
<v Speaker 1>that's the intent here.

0:11:08.400 --> 0:11:10.320
<v Speaker 2>So you're right, it's not really about converting the trolls

0:11:10.320 --> 0:11:10.680
<v Speaker 2>so much.

0:11:10.600 --> 0:11:12.800
<v Speaker 1>As it is about informing the people who know they're

0:11:12.800 --> 0:11:14.600
<v Speaker 1>wrong and want to have the facts to back it up.

0:11:14.760 --> 0:11:16.760
<v Speaker 1>And also everybody in the middle that maybe doesn't know

0:11:16.760 --> 0:11:19.240
<v Speaker 1>and hasn't looked into it, who now gets this information

0:11:19.280 --> 0:11:21.720
<v Speaker 1>that helps them potentially be more interested in women's sports

0:11:21.760 --> 0:11:24.439
<v Speaker 1>at the very least, not believe the BS stuff that's

0:11:24.480 --> 0:11:26.360
<v Speaker 1>coming out of the other side. Now, if I heard

0:11:26.400 --> 0:11:30.000
<v Speaker 1>you describe in an interview this book as sas you

0:11:30.040 --> 0:11:33.120
<v Speaker 1>said of the trolls, they don't deserve our calm and

0:11:33.280 --> 0:11:34.320
<v Speaker 1>welcoming demeanor.

0:11:34.400 --> 0:11:37.520
<v Speaker 2>They deserve a bit of sassiness. I couldn't agree more.

0:11:38.000 --> 0:11:40.440
<v Speaker 1>Was it clear from the beginning for both of you

0:11:40.600 --> 0:11:41.920
<v Speaker 1>that that's the tone you wanted?

0:11:42.000 --> 0:11:43.440
<v Speaker 2>And how does Nef's.

0:11:43.120 --> 0:11:46.200
<v Speaker 1>SaaS and Dave's sas meet in the middle so that

0:11:46.240 --> 0:11:48.800
<v Speaker 1>there's a through line in the actual composing of the book.

0:11:49.240 --> 0:11:53.600
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, that's where the fun happened, right, trying to combine

0:11:53.600 --> 0:11:57.520
<v Speaker 5>our sassiness. But really, honestly, the book, if you read it,

0:11:57.640 --> 0:11:59.960
<v Speaker 5>and if you know Dave, the book is really right,

0:12:00.080 --> 0:12:02.360
<v Speaker 5>and in Dave's voice, right, I mean, we got together

0:12:02.440 --> 0:12:05.000
<v Speaker 5>and we began writing together, and you know, sometimes we

0:12:05.040 --> 0:12:08.120
<v Speaker 5>would actually literally write as we're meeting. Oftentimes we would

0:12:08.120 --> 0:12:10.079
<v Speaker 5>write pieces of the book and then come together put

0:12:10.120 --> 0:12:12.040
<v Speaker 5>it together and then sort of talk through it. But

0:12:12.080 --> 0:12:13.600
<v Speaker 5>at the end of the day, what we notice is

0:12:13.600 --> 0:12:18.480
<v Speaker 5>that my writing was very much so academic focused, and

0:12:18.520 --> 0:12:21.679
<v Speaker 5>I had a very difficult time transitioning from the academic

0:12:21.720 --> 0:12:25.560
<v Speaker 5>style of writing to writing for a trade book, writing

0:12:25.600 --> 0:12:28.040
<v Speaker 5>for a general audience, and writing, you know, essentially at

0:12:28.320 --> 0:12:31.200
<v Speaker 5>a fifth grade level. Eventually I got it. But what

0:12:31.240 --> 0:12:33.480
<v Speaker 5>we decided is that we needed to write it in

0:12:33.480 --> 0:12:35.400
<v Speaker 5>one voice. If we wrote it in both of our voices,

0:12:35.400 --> 0:12:39.760
<v Speaker 5>it would be confusing. It was disjointed. So the sassiness.

0:12:39.920 --> 0:12:42.720
<v Speaker 5>Dave is sassy if you've met Dave in person, if

0:12:42.760 --> 0:12:45.000
<v Speaker 5>you talk to Dave, if you see him on X, he.

0:12:45.120 --> 0:12:46.560
<v Speaker 3>Is sassy in general.

0:12:47.240 --> 0:12:49.480
<v Speaker 5>So the sassiness came from that, and then I'm far

0:12:49.600 --> 0:12:52.760
<v Speaker 5>less sassy. But these people are so irritating that I

0:12:52.880 --> 0:12:55.960
<v Speaker 5>found my inner sassiness and brought it out. So yeah,

0:12:56.120 --> 0:12:58.319
<v Speaker 5>at the end of the day, you know, again watching

0:12:58.320 --> 0:13:01.800
<v Speaker 5>folks like you and Jamil respond to these people and

0:13:01.880 --> 0:13:03.840
<v Speaker 5>many others. Right, I use you into as an example,

0:13:03.880 --> 0:13:05.480
<v Speaker 5>but there are many others that are out there just

0:13:05.520 --> 0:13:08.160
<v Speaker 5>trying to do their job in the media and waste

0:13:08.160 --> 0:13:11.680
<v Speaker 5>in almost all women, wasting their time that could be

0:13:11.800 --> 0:13:15.160
<v Speaker 5>spent doing other important things responding to these people and.

0:13:15.120 --> 0:13:17.080
<v Speaker 3>Doing it nicely, right, And I'm like, no, we don't

0:13:17.120 --> 0:13:18.800
<v Speaker 3>have to be nice. This is in our field. We're

0:13:18.840 --> 0:13:21.240
<v Speaker 3>not in the media. It doesn't matter what we say.

0:13:21.400 --> 0:13:24.640
<v Speaker 5>We're academics, you know, we go back to our caves

0:13:24.679 --> 0:13:27.959
<v Speaker 5>and right, like, we can be sassy in the public

0:13:28.000 --> 0:13:29.559
<v Speaker 5>eye and continue on with our lives.

0:13:29.559 --> 0:13:30.040
<v Speaker 3>So why not.

0:13:30.240 --> 0:13:33.880
<v Speaker 5>And again, I don't think these folks deserve our calm

0:13:34.040 --> 0:13:37.080
<v Speaker 5>or a welcomness because they're not being genuine in their

0:13:37.120 --> 0:13:38.920
<v Speaker 5>responses when they're being trolls.

0:13:39.880 --> 0:13:41.920
<v Speaker 1>I think sassy's the perfect word, though, because if you

0:13:41.960 --> 0:13:46.120
<v Speaker 1>start to become cruel or dismissive, your message is lost

0:13:46.200 --> 0:13:48.960
<v Speaker 1>because it's easier than to fight the attitude you're bringing

0:13:49.000 --> 0:13:52.560
<v Speaker 1>instead of the information you're bringing. So the sassiness says, listen,

0:13:52.640 --> 0:13:54.920
<v Speaker 1>we're tired of your bullshit and here's the real facts

0:13:55.200 --> 0:13:58.240
<v Speaker 1>versus cruelty, which this just then adds to this sort

0:13:58.280 --> 0:14:02.440
<v Speaker 1>of schism when nobody seeks to find common ground and

0:14:02.480 --> 0:14:05.800
<v Speaker 1>to meet over the information, it's just about pushing the

0:14:05.800 --> 0:14:08.199
<v Speaker 1>other side away. So I think SAS's like the perfect word,

0:14:08.240 --> 0:14:09.959
<v Speaker 1>and that's what I aim for. I've had plenty of

0:14:10.000 --> 0:14:11.520
<v Speaker 1>people reach out to me who are up and coming

0:14:11.520 --> 0:14:13.439
<v Speaker 1>in the business and say, should I worry about getting

0:14:13.520 --> 0:14:15.959
<v Speaker 1>hired if I clap back occasionally to trolls, And I

0:14:15.960 --> 0:14:19.400
<v Speaker 1>always say, as long as you are not cruel and

0:14:19.440 --> 0:14:22.000
<v Speaker 1>you are civil and the information that you're providing or

0:14:22.040 --> 0:14:24.120
<v Speaker 1>the way you're clapping back is either just funny about

0:14:24.160 --> 0:14:25.960
<v Speaker 1>grammar or spelling, because that is always a go to

0:14:26.040 --> 0:14:29.080
<v Speaker 1>for me if somebody's coming after me or if it's informed,

0:14:29.440 --> 0:14:32.840
<v Speaker 1>you're fine, just don't sync down to their level. We

0:14:32.920 --> 0:14:34.760
<v Speaker 1>got to take a quick break more with Neph and

0:14:34.800 --> 0:14:42.360
<v Speaker 1>Dave coming up. You know, Dave, you came on my

0:14:42.400 --> 0:14:44.920
<v Speaker 1>old podcast. I've been following you for years. I learned

0:14:44.960 --> 0:14:48.120
<v Speaker 1>a ton about how to see the women's pro sports

0:14:48.120 --> 0:14:50.560
<v Speaker 1>space through an academic lens, in part because of the

0:14:50.560 --> 0:14:53.880
<v Speaker 1>research that you would share and the important historical context

0:14:53.960 --> 0:14:55.520
<v Speaker 1>that you would bring in. Some of your most compelling

0:14:55.560 --> 0:14:58.400
<v Speaker 1>and important work I think is helping folks learn the

0:14:58.440 --> 0:15:01.920
<v Speaker 1>realities of men's leagues at their inception, years before many

0:15:01.920 --> 0:15:04.640
<v Speaker 1>of us were ever alive. Can you share what might

0:15:04.680 --> 0:15:08.160
<v Speaker 1>be some surprising realities around, for instance, the NBA's lean

0:15:08.360 --> 0:15:10.800
<v Speaker 1>early years, and how you can use information like that

0:15:11.040 --> 0:15:13.640
<v Speaker 1>to help people understand why their opinions on women's sports

0:15:13.720 --> 0:15:14.720
<v Speaker 1>are not correct.

0:15:15.920 --> 0:15:16.160
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:15:16.200 --> 0:15:18.720
<v Speaker 4>Sure, yeah, let's let's start with the NBA. I think

0:15:18.760 --> 0:15:21.200
<v Speaker 4>the NBA. Most people don't know the story of the NBA.

0:15:22.040 --> 0:15:27.040
<v Speaker 4>It starts in the in the forties. It is college

0:15:27.280 --> 0:15:31.360
<v Speaker 4>men's basketball had been around for decades, had been was very,

0:15:31.480 --> 0:15:36.520
<v Speaker 4>very popular. It had a huge audience, and naturally people thought, hey,

0:15:36.600 --> 0:15:40.600
<v Speaker 4>let's take those same exact athletes, put them on professional teams,

0:15:40.640 --> 0:15:44.040
<v Speaker 4>and we'll sell tickets. And they did that, and they

0:15:44.040 --> 0:15:47.000
<v Speaker 4>did not there were no tickets to be sold, and

0:15:47.080 --> 0:15:53.160
<v Speaker 4>they tried lots of things early in NBA history. They

0:15:53.240 --> 0:15:57.040
<v Speaker 4>would they would schedule NBA games after high school games.

0:15:57.440 --> 0:16:00.760
<v Speaker 4>You came to watch your kid watch a professional. Bob

0:16:00.800 --> 0:16:03.640
<v Speaker 4>Goosey tells the story that when he was originally drafted,

0:16:03.720 --> 0:16:05.720
<v Speaker 4>not by the Celtics, he was drafted by the Tri

0:16:05.960 --> 0:16:09.720
<v Speaker 4>City Hawks. He's like, I did major geography at holy Cross,

0:16:09.720 --> 0:16:10.920
<v Speaker 4>but I knew there was no such thing as a

0:16:10.960 --> 0:16:14.800
<v Speaker 4>tri City Well, they couldn't get an audience in one city,

0:16:14.840 --> 0:16:17.560
<v Speaker 4>so they put in three cities, and so they all,

0:16:17.760 --> 0:16:20.880
<v Speaker 4>maybe if we run around, we'll find some audience. They

0:16:20.920 --> 0:16:23.960
<v Speaker 4>had an early memo from the Commission. In the first

0:16:24.120 --> 0:16:27.080
<v Speaker 4>you know, five or six years of the NBA, it says, hey,

0:16:27.240 --> 0:16:29.480
<v Speaker 4>some of you are telling the media how many people

0:16:29.480 --> 0:16:32.600
<v Speaker 4>are actually showing up to these games. Well, don't do that.

0:16:33.080 --> 0:16:36.000
<v Speaker 4>You are free to pad the numbers, you know, you

0:16:36.040 --> 0:16:38.720
<v Speaker 4>don't have to tell the truth. And so that's where

0:16:38.720 --> 0:16:42.320
<v Speaker 4>the NBA starts. And we know from Congressional testimony because

0:16:42.360 --> 0:16:46.760
<v Speaker 4>Congress investigated professional sports in the fifties men's professional sports.

0:16:46.760 --> 0:16:50.120
<v Speaker 4>The NBA at that point in today's dollars was worth

0:16:50.160 --> 0:16:54.640
<v Speaker 4>about fifteen million. So the WNBA is worth hundreds of millions.

0:16:54.680 --> 0:16:58.280
<v Speaker 4>They were worth fifteen million. They were incredibly tighty. If

0:16:58.320 --> 0:17:02.200
<v Speaker 4>you get up to nineteen seventy seventy two, that's when

0:17:02.200 --> 0:17:05.159
<v Speaker 4>the NBA is the same age as the WNBA, same age.

0:17:05.920 --> 0:17:10.960
<v Speaker 4>Their revenue in the late sixties early seventies jumps from

0:17:10.960 --> 0:17:15.120
<v Speaker 4>one hundred million to two hundred million. The WNBA's revenue

0:17:15.160 --> 0:17:17.560
<v Speaker 4>from twenty nineteen to twenty twenty three jump from one

0:17:17.640 --> 0:17:20.560
<v Speaker 4>hundred million to two hundred million, exactly the same thing.

0:17:21.359 --> 0:17:24.639
<v Speaker 4>There was. There is a really big difference. The NBA

0:17:24.680 --> 0:17:28.240
<v Speaker 4>at that point was paying Kareem Abdul Jabbar four hundred

0:17:28.240 --> 0:17:31.440
<v Speaker 4>thousand dollars a year in nineteen seventy three. Nobody that

0:17:31.520 --> 0:17:33.840
<v Speaker 4>of NBA is making four hundred thousand dollars a year now,

0:17:34.760 --> 0:17:37.439
<v Speaker 4>So there is a huge difference in wages, but in

0:17:37.520 --> 0:17:40.240
<v Speaker 4>terms of revenue, terms of attendance, in terms of how

0:17:40.320 --> 0:17:43.760
<v Speaker 4>much people are paying attention to this, the NBA and

0:17:43.800 --> 0:17:48.400
<v Speaker 4>the WNBA are following essentially the same path. They are

0:17:48.440 --> 0:17:51.719
<v Speaker 4>adding fans just like you'd expect it. It just takes

0:17:51.920 --> 0:17:55.960
<v Speaker 4>decades to build a fan base. Most people are born

0:17:56.119 --> 0:17:59.800
<v Speaker 4>into their fandom. You don't. You don't become a rabbit

0:17:59.840 --> 0:18:02.760
<v Speaker 4>fan of a lot of things as an adult. It's

0:18:02.800 --> 0:18:05.840
<v Speaker 4>basically it's an addiction. So the way to think about

0:18:05.840 --> 0:18:08.720
<v Speaker 4>it is, imagine all the people you know who at

0:18:08.760 --> 0:18:12.000
<v Speaker 4>the age of forty took up smoking cigarettes. That's a

0:18:12.040 --> 0:18:15.159
<v Speaker 4>bizarre thing to do, right, That would be bizarre. That's

0:18:15.280 --> 0:18:17.520
<v Speaker 4>what a fandom is, right. You know, if you're forty

0:18:17.560 --> 0:18:20.200
<v Speaker 4>years old, you're not going to suddenly say, hey, I'm

0:18:20.240 --> 0:18:21.800
<v Speaker 4>going to be a fan of this sport I've never

0:18:21.840 --> 0:18:25.120
<v Speaker 4>watched before. That's not realistic. You do it as a child,

0:18:25.160 --> 0:18:27.040
<v Speaker 4>do you pick it up from your parents and your

0:18:27.119 --> 0:18:31.240
<v Speaker 4>friends and your relatives, and it grows gradually as that

0:18:31.520 --> 0:18:35.159
<v Speaker 4>network gets bigger and bigger, and so everyone investing in

0:18:35.160 --> 0:18:37.960
<v Speaker 4>a women's sports league, whether it's National Women's Soccer League

0:18:38.040 --> 0:18:42.040
<v Speaker 4>or the WNBA, should expect this will take decades, but

0:18:42.160 --> 0:18:45.720
<v Speaker 4>eventually fans will get addicted and then you'll have the

0:18:45.720 --> 0:18:50.120
<v Speaker 4>greatest business ever imaginable, because there is no business like sports.

0:18:50.640 --> 0:18:54.080
<v Speaker 4>Sports is a business that you can disappoint your fans

0:18:54.880 --> 0:19:00.520
<v Speaker 4>every single year and they never go away. Right, Chicago

0:19:00.560 --> 0:19:02.640
<v Speaker 4>Bears fan, you know this, Yeah, we.

0:19:02.680 --> 0:19:06.280
<v Speaker 1>Talked about this before. You use the restaurant example. Being

0:19:06.280 --> 0:19:08.440
<v Speaker 1>a Chicago Bears fan is like going to the same

0:19:08.480 --> 0:19:10.719
<v Speaker 1>restaurant over and over and they serve you like a

0:19:10.760 --> 0:19:13.159
<v Speaker 1>plate of shit, and you're like, thank you, I'll be

0:19:13.200 --> 0:19:13.920
<v Speaker 1>back next week.

0:19:14.560 --> 0:19:18.960
<v Speaker 4>Yes, yes, And and then you get convinced of this.

0:19:19.080 --> 0:19:21.480
<v Speaker 4>You go to the owner and the owner says, I

0:19:21.600 --> 0:19:24.880
<v Speaker 4>understand that this food has been crap for so long.

0:19:25.000 --> 0:19:27.600
<v Speaker 4>But here's what I did. I got a new bus boy,

0:19:28.480 --> 0:19:30.600
<v Speaker 4>and it's going to change everything. And you would be like,

0:19:31.080 --> 0:19:32.960
<v Speaker 4>oh my god, a new bus boy.

0:19:33.200 --> 0:19:36.640
<v Speaker 1>Oh I believe I'm it's going to be different now,

0:19:36.880 --> 0:19:38.679
<v Speaker 1>Oh it's gonna be I didn't know you got a

0:19:38.720 --> 0:19:39.440
<v Speaker 1>new busboy.

0:19:39.680 --> 0:19:43.520
<v Speaker 4>Well, I'll be back for sure. And that's exactly how

0:19:44.080 --> 0:19:46.760
<v Speaker 4>sports fans are. You know they you know, they draft,

0:19:47.320 --> 0:19:50.480
<v Speaker 4>they draft a brand new offensive guard, and every fan

0:19:50.640 --> 0:19:53.360
<v Speaker 4>is like, oh, well, that is all the difference that's

0:19:53.359 --> 0:19:54.520
<v Speaker 4>gonna change every reason.

0:19:55.040 --> 0:19:57.080
<v Speaker 1>And it's so true though, and it's something I've talked

0:19:57.080 --> 0:19:59.439
<v Speaker 1>about so much with women's sports, is how do you

0:19:59.520 --> 0:20:05.120
<v Speaker 1>recreate things that can't be done organically, like nostalgia and tradition.

0:20:05.600 --> 0:20:07.680
<v Speaker 1>So much of what brings us together around sport is

0:20:07.680 --> 0:20:09.199
<v Speaker 1>when you go to a game, you know what the

0:20:09.280 --> 0:20:12.160
<v Speaker 1>chants are, and you know what everybody always does when

0:20:12.160 --> 0:20:14.920
<v Speaker 1>this thing happens. And if that existence hasn't been there

0:20:14.960 --> 0:20:16.560
<v Speaker 1>for longer than a couple of years, that's not going

0:20:16.640 --> 0:20:18.840
<v Speaker 1>to exist yet. So how do you either be intentional

0:20:18.880 --> 0:20:21.080
<v Speaker 1>about creating it or how do you offset that with

0:20:21.160 --> 0:20:23.360
<v Speaker 1>other things that make it exciting. One thing I'll point

0:20:23.359 --> 0:20:27.280
<v Speaker 1>out about the NBAWNBA comparison is, of course, the WNBA

0:20:27.400 --> 0:20:30.760
<v Speaker 1>benefits from an NBA that is financially helping them, that

0:20:30.880 --> 0:20:33.439
<v Speaker 1>has existed and created a sort of path and model

0:20:33.800 --> 0:20:36.639
<v Speaker 1>that is part of a larger cable and streaming and

0:20:37.119 --> 0:20:42.160
<v Speaker 1>massive sports entertainment industrial complex that didn't exist for early NBA,

0:20:42.240 --> 0:20:45.080
<v Speaker 1>but it also suffers from that because of comparison. It

0:20:45.119 --> 0:20:48.480
<v Speaker 1>also suffers from centuries of patriarchy. It also suffers from

0:20:48.520 --> 0:20:50.920
<v Speaker 1>expectations about women and what lane in which they belong.

0:20:51.040 --> 0:20:53.800
<v Speaker 1>So it's not in apples to apples comparison, but it

0:20:53.880 --> 0:20:56.280
<v Speaker 1>is so useful to look back at some of the

0:20:56.280 --> 0:21:00.000
<v Speaker 1>moments that we herald in NBA history and be remind

0:21:00.040 --> 0:21:02.760
<v Speaker 1>I did that eight thousand people were there for them, right,

0:21:02.800 --> 0:21:06.560
<v Speaker 1>these great players, these moments of scoring, and in our

0:21:06.640 --> 0:21:09.440
<v Speaker 1>minds the stadium is full and everyone's watching on TV,

0:21:09.560 --> 0:21:12.240
<v Speaker 1>when in fact it was on tape delay and almost.

0:21:11.880 --> 0:21:14.040
<v Speaker 2>No one showed up to watch it. Those are important

0:21:14.040 --> 0:21:14.960
<v Speaker 2>things to remember.

0:21:15.880 --> 0:21:18.200
<v Speaker 1>Nef I mentioned in your intro you were a Division

0:21:18.200 --> 0:21:21.560
<v Speaker 1>one basketball player yourself. You're a talented female athlete who

0:21:21.640 --> 0:21:25.720
<v Speaker 1>has lived the life of trying to be given respect,

0:21:25.840 --> 0:21:30.200
<v Speaker 1>afforded resources and facilities. How did the negative noise around

0:21:30.280 --> 0:21:34.439
<v Speaker 1>athletes when you were hooping inform your perspective now? And

0:21:34.440 --> 0:21:36.560
<v Speaker 1>how much have you seen it change?

0:21:36.880 --> 0:21:37.080
<v Speaker 2>Oh?

0:21:37.119 --> 0:21:40.040
<v Speaker 5>Man, it absolutely informed who I am, right, I mean,

0:21:40.080 --> 0:21:42.680
<v Speaker 5>I think and I say that, But also I kind

0:21:42.720 --> 0:21:45.879
<v Speaker 5>of lived in a bubble where I played in a

0:21:45.960 --> 0:21:50.720
<v Speaker 5>part of Atlanta where women's basketball was very popular, girls

0:21:50.800 --> 0:21:54.520
<v Speaker 5>basketball was very popular. Growing up, I was coached by

0:21:55.119 --> 0:21:59.000
<v Speaker 5>a black guy who played college football at a high level,

0:21:59.040 --> 0:22:02.480
<v Speaker 5>played some basketball, and he just he had a lot

0:22:02.520 --> 0:22:06.200
<v Speaker 5>of daughters. He just did not see the gender barriers

0:22:06.240 --> 0:22:08.360
<v Speaker 5>to success in the ways that a lot of other

0:22:08.720 --> 0:22:11.800
<v Speaker 5>girls may have experienced it at a young age. I've

0:22:11.880 --> 0:22:14.640
<v Speaker 5>told the story before that we played against boys at

0:22:14.640 --> 0:22:17.280
<v Speaker 5>a very young age and routinely beat them. So as

0:22:17.280 --> 0:22:19.320
<v Speaker 5>a you know, thirteen year old ne f thought she

0:22:19.400 --> 0:22:21.960
<v Speaker 5>could beat anybody that was thirteen, right, it wouldn't matter

0:22:22.000 --> 0:22:22.320
<v Speaker 5>if you.

0:22:22.280 --> 0:22:23.200
<v Speaker 3>Were a girl or a boy.

0:22:23.600 --> 0:22:26.399
<v Speaker 5>And that just, you know, that followed me throughout my career,

0:22:26.560 --> 0:22:30.320
<v Speaker 5>both athletically and academically. I do I will say that

0:22:30.400 --> 0:22:33.439
<v Speaker 5>when I got to college, you could see the differences, right.

0:22:33.480 --> 0:22:35.040
<v Speaker 5>I mean I also went to a high school where

0:22:35.080 --> 0:22:38.800
<v Speaker 5>the girls and boys team was treated similarly, but also

0:22:38.960 --> 0:22:42.200
<v Speaker 5>the girls team was much more successful winning state championships

0:22:42.200 --> 0:22:45.240
<v Speaker 5>than the boys team. So again, it just it was

0:22:45.280 --> 0:22:48.280
<v Speaker 5>it didn't occur to me until college that you are

0:22:48.320 --> 0:22:52.880
<v Speaker 5>treated the genders are treated differently based on just gender. Right,

0:22:53.240 --> 0:22:56.000
<v Speaker 5>Women's and men's basketball are not treated the same. I

0:22:56.000 --> 0:22:57.760
<v Speaker 5>got to Georgia, Tech and it was night and day.

0:22:58.119 --> 0:23:01.439
<v Speaker 5>The experiences that the men team got versus the women's

0:23:01.440 --> 0:23:06.240
<v Speaker 5>team wasn't even comparable. And you know, I say this often,

0:23:06.400 --> 0:23:09.320
<v Speaker 5>is it's not just isolated in sports, and I think

0:23:09.400 --> 0:23:12.280
<v Speaker 5>we have to acknowledge that. I think this moment right now,

0:23:12.480 --> 0:23:16.920
<v Speaker 5>we've seen, you know, two of the most qualified political

0:23:16.960 --> 0:23:20.480
<v Speaker 5>candidates in the history run for being women, run for

0:23:20.520 --> 0:23:24.359
<v Speaker 5>presidencies and lose. I think we have to acknowledged the

0:23:24.359 --> 0:23:29.400
<v Speaker 5>fact that there's always this undercurrent of sexism and hegemonic masculinity.

0:23:29.400 --> 0:23:32.520
<v Speaker 5>Not to get too nerdy and theoretical, but these ideas

0:23:32.560 --> 0:23:37.879
<v Speaker 5>that there are negative stereotypes about women that are at play,

0:23:38.040 --> 0:23:41.280
<v Speaker 5>and it's very easy for leagues and organizations to fall

0:23:41.320 --> 0:23:43.159
<v Speaker 5>back into those when they don't want to actually just

0:23:43.240 --> 0:23:46.080
<v Speaker 5>share the fact, like the NBA or WNBA that they're

0:23:46.119 --> 0:23:50.320
<v Speaker 5>not necessarily valuing women's sports or women's teams or a

0:23:50.320 --> 0:23:52.119
<v Speaker 5>whole league, and the way that they have valued and

0:23:52.160 --> 0:23:54.720
<v Speaker 5>treated the men's league over time. So that's a very

0:23:54.760 --> 0:23:58.480
<v Speaker 5>long way, long winded way of saying I didn't acknowledge

0:23:58.480 --> 0:24:01.280
<v Speaker 5>that these gender inequities exist until I was in college,

0:24:02.080 --> 0:24:04.399
<v Speaker 5>and then very quickly I began to acknowledge it and

0:24:04.440 --> 0:24:06.160
<v Speaker 5>sort of dig into why this is happening.

0:24:07.000 --> 0:24:09.040
<v Speaker 3>I was coaching and training.

0:24:08.640 --> 0:24:11.720
<v Speaker 5>Boys, you know, in college. I played with boys my

0:24:11.760 --> 0:24:15.640
<v Speaker 5>whole life. So just being a basketball player and playing

0:24:16.560 --> 0:24:19.560
<v Speaker 5>in a city where the girls and boys are playing

0:24:19.560 --> 0:24:23.080
<v Speaker 5>together pickup games are But you know, all folks, if

0:24:23.080 --> 0:24:24.760
<v Speaker 5>you show up and you can play, then you can play.

0:24:24.960 --> 0:24:27.160
<v Speaker 5>You're not getting kicked off the court because you're a girl.

0:24:27.240 --> 0:24:30.080
<v Speaker 5>In Atlanta and similar in a lot of big cities

0:24:30.160 --> 0:24:32.679
<v Speaker 5>right especially for at least my experience is being in

0:24:32.680 --> 0:24:33.720
<v Speaker 5>black neighborhoods as well.

0:24:33.720 --> 0:24:34.520
<v Speaker 3>It's just not happening.

0:24:34.560 --> 0:24:36.800
<v Speaker 5>If you can play, you can play, and then going

0:24:36.840 --> 0:24:40.359
<v Speaker 5>to organize basketball at the collegiate level and saying no,

0:24:40.880 --> 0:24:42.800
<v Speaker 5>if you're good and if you're better, and if your

0:24:42.840 --> 0:24:44.639
<v Speaker 5>team's better than the men's team, it doesn't matter. You're

0:24:44.680 --> 0:24:46.960
<v Speaker 5>still not going to get the same resources that they're

0:24:47.000 --> 0:24:49.320
<v Speaker 5>getting even though they haven't won a game all year.

0:24:49.840 --> 0:24:52.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's something I've talked to mothers and especially women

0:24:52.920 --> 0:24:57.520
<v Speaker 1>who coach younger girls, is what is the balance between

0:24:57.640 --> 0:25:01.639
<v Speaker 1>telling young girls you can do any thing, believe in yourself,

0:25:01.680 --> 0:25:05.119
<v Speaker 1>you're just as great, versus saying just so you know

0:25:05.280 --> 0:25:07.199
<v Speaker 1>you're not going to get the same resources, You're not

0:25:07.200 --> 0:25:09.800
<v Speaker 1>going to get the same facilities. You're going to have

0:25:09.800 --> 0:25:12.960
<v Speaker 1>to demand equality because otherwise you won't get it. Thereby

0:25:13.000 --> 0:25:15.720
<v Speaker 1>sort of bursting their bubble too early, but also maybe

0:25:15.720 --> 0:25:18.639
<v Speaker 1>creating activists out of younger women before they get to

0:25:18.640 --> 0:25:21.000
<v Speaker 1>the collegiate level and start to look around and realize.

0:25:20.640 --> 0:25:21.800
<v Speaker 2>Well, this is messed up.

0:25:22.040 --> 0:25:23.720
<v Speaker 1>Because I feel the same way, like so many of

0:25:23.800 --> 0:25:26.240
<v Speaker 1>us also become so conditioned to that that it isn't

0:25:26.280 --> 0:25:28.720
<v Speaker 1>until later in life that we realize that technically, per

0:25:28.760 --> 0:25:31.520
<v Speaker 1>Title nine, we could have suit our schools, or we

0:25:31.560 --> 0:25:34.480
<v Speaker 1>could have complained about getting less than. But because society

0:25:34.560 --> 0:25:37.359
<v Speaker 1>seemed to so endorse the idea that we deserved less than,

0:25:37.920 --> 0:25:39.639
<v Speaker 1>it didn't occur to us that we should ask for

0:25:39.680 --> 0:25:42.120
<v Speaker 1>anything otherwise until you get to later in life.

0:25:41.920 --> 0:25:43.919
<v Speaker 2>And then it's sort of beyond your control.

0:25:44.000 --> 0:25:46.159
<v Speaker 1>So yet, that's a conversation I guess for people with

0:25:46.920 --> 0:25:51.720
<v Speaker 1>kids and coaches. You know, there's so many passionate, informed

0:25:51.760 --> 0:25:54.440
<v Speaker 1>fans of women's sports, there's so many smart people investing

0:25:54.480 --> 0:25:56.800
<v Speaker 1>in women's pro leagues. But there are folks at the

0:25:56.920 --> 0:25:59.840
<v Speaker 1>highest levels of brands and networks and media outlets that

0:25:59.880 --> 0:26:02.960
<v Speaker 1>are essentially more akin to the trolls that you're speaking to.

0:26:03.000 --> 0:26:04.919
<v Speaker 1>They're stuck in the past when it comes to the

0:26:04.920 --> 0:26:07.800
<v Speaker 1>economic opportunity offered and the realities of the interest in

0:26:07.800 --> 0:26:11.160
<v Speaker 1>women's sports. How do we get the trolls in high

0:26:11.240 --> 0:26:14.240
<v Speaker 1>places to be more educated and up to date?

0:26:14.400 --> 0:26:20.080
<v Speaker 4>Dave, Yeah, let me. I'll get that fixed for you

0:26:20.119 --> 0:26:20.600
<v Speaker 4>by lunch.

0:26:20.920 --> 0:26:24.440
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, thank you, link with lunch, probably martini lunch

0:26:24.760 --> 0:26:25.600
<v Speaker 1>a couple hours.

0:26:25.960 --> 0:26:27.680
<v Speaker 2>We're dealing with the trolls of our places.

0:26:29.840 --> 0:26:34.080
<v Speaker 4>When Enough was talking, she said hegemonic masculinity, and I

0:26:34.119 --> 0:26:36.439
<v Speaker 4>would point out that book that works do not appear

0:26:36.440 --> 0:26:39.480
<v Speaker 4>in our book. The way we say that is the

0:26:39.520 --> 0:26:43.399
<v Speaker 4>way we put it is in sports men really love men.

0:26:43.720 --> 0:26:47.520
<v Speaker 4>That's that's effectively the same sentiment, but it's said it

0:26:47.560 --> 0:26:50.520
<v Speaker 4>a more accessible way because and that's actually true. The

0:26:50.600 --> 0:26:54.440
<v Speaker 4>problem is in sports and when you look at these

0:26:54.440 --> 0:26:58.320
<v Speaker 4>companies when it comes to sports, men are really in

0:26:58.359 --> 0:27:01.640
<v Speaker 4>love with men, and they treat women. And we say

0:27:01.640 --> 0:27:06.399
<v Speaker 4>this in the book. Women are treated as if women's

0:27:06.440 --> 0:27:09.359
<v Speaker 4>sports are a cardboard factory and all that matters is

0:27:09.400 --> 0:27:13.240
<v Speaker 4>the latest financial statement, and men's sports are treated as

0:27:13.280 --> 0:27:16.119
<v Speaker 4>if this is my passion, I am living my life

0:27:16.119 --> 0:27:17.879
<v Speaker 4>through these men. I don't give a damn how much

0:27:17.920 --> 0:27:21.320
<v Speaker 4>my money they spend. I just want to win because

0:27:21.359 --> 0:27:25.440
<v Speaker 4>this is everything to me. And the problem is getting

0:27:25.640 --> 0:27:29.600
<v Speaker 4>the investors to be as emotionally connected to what they're

0:27:29.600 --> 0:27:32.840
<v Speaker 4>investing in. And there are WNBA owners and I think

0:27:32.840 --> 0:27:34.959
<v Speaker 4>Mark Davis with the ACE is a good example of this,

0:27:35.040 --> 0:27:38.120
<v Speaker 4>who goes to the games. He clearly is emotionally involved.

0:27:38.200 --> 0:27:41.760
<v Speaker 4>He wants his team to win. He will break rules

0:27:41.800 --> 0:27:44.119
<v Speaker 4>to make his team win. And we don't like that,

0:27:44.280 --> 0:27:47.000
<v Speaker 4>but that's a good sign. You want to see people

0:27:47.080 --> 0:27:49.639
<v Speaker 4>doing that, that they're so involved that they're willing to

0:27:49.640 --> 0:27:53.600
<v Speaker 4>do stuff like that. And that's the problem is. I

0:27:53.640 --> 0:27:56.800
<v Speaker 4>think one of the ex that holds back women's sports

0:27:56.920 --> 0:27:59.400
<v Speaker 4>is so many people trying to treat this as a

0:27:59.440 --> 0:28:02.600
<v Speaker 4>financial statement for this month. And it's not if you're

0:28:02.600 --> 0:28:06.199
<v Speaker 4>going to be an investor. It's it's long term. But

0:28:06.359 --> 0:28:09.840
<v Speaker 4>also you got to get investors who are passionate about

0:28:09.840 --> 0:28:14.600
<v Speaker 4>the actual sport and and you know, but if you

0:28:14.640 --> 0:28:17.400
<v Speaker 4>can't get that, I do. I will point this out.

0:28:17.480 --> 0:28:20.280
<v Speaker 4>As Neph and I were working on this book, go

0:28:20.359 --> 0:28:23.879
<v Speaker 4>back to twenty eighteen where we started, where women's sports

0:28:24.000 --> 0:28:27.159
<v Speaker 4>was in twenty eighteen where it is today. You know,

0:28:27.200 --> 0:28:29.080
<v Speaker 4>one of the things I said, I think and I

0:28:29.119 --> 0:28:30.920
<v Speaker 4>were saying when we were writing this book is is

0:28:31.160 --> 0:28:33.080
<v Speaker 4>this book allows us a lot of I told you

0:28:33.200 --> 0:28:38.040
<v Speaker 4>those and so as we go through time, neph and

0:28:38.080 --> 0:28:41.480
<v Speaker 4>I just go, I told you so. And here's a

0:28:41.480 --> 0:28:45.640
<v Speaker 4>fun little stat. W NBA ratings this last year average

0:28:45.720 --> 0:28:49.600
<v Speaker 4>a million fans across all platforms on ESPN one point

0:28:49.640 --> 0:28:53.840
<v Speaker 4>two million, NBA ratings right now on ESPN one point

0:28:53.840 --> 0:28:58.960
<v Speaker 4>six million. The difference is getting smaller and smaller and smaller.

0:28:59.520 --> 0:29:02.440
<v Speaker 4>And yet the NBA totally ripped off the WNBA in

0:29:02.520 --> 0:29:05.360
<v Speaker 4>terms of the media deal. It's a seventy five billion

0:29:05.400 --> 0:29:08.880
<v Speaker 4>dollar deal. The NBA gave them ninety seven percent of it.

0:29:09.320 --> 0:29:12.600
<v Speaker 4>They're not getting ninety seven percent of the ratings. That's ridiculous.

0:29:13.480 --> 0:29:16.120
<v Speaker 4>And so you know the NBA talks about how they

0:29:16.200 --> 0:29:18.280
<v Speaker 4>gave so much money to the WNBA. Well you look

0:29:18.320 --> 0:29:21.920
<v Speaker 4>at that media deal. They are taking more. They're going

0:29:21.960 --> 0:29:23.880
<v Speaker 4>to be taking if you do the math, they're going

0:29:23.960 --> 0:29:26.479
<v Speaker 4>to be taking back every loss that they made up,

0:29:26.520 --> 0:29:28.680
<v Speaker 4>and the losses I believe are made up. They're going

0:29:28.720 --> 0:29:30.440
<v Speaker 4>to take back all the losses they made up. And

0:29:30.520 --> 0:29:33.440
<v Speaker 4>more every single year of that deal, every single year

0:29:33.480 --> 0:29:35.800
<v Speaker 4>they're going to be getting all that money back, and

0:29:35.920 --> 0:29:39.400
<v Speaker 4>so it's a huge The NBA is going to make

0:29:39.560 --> 0:29:43.200
<v Speaker 4>billions off the WNBA, billions of dollars off of them.

0:29:43.320 --> 0:29:45.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, let's talk us through this, and we don't have

0:29:45.400 --> 0:29:47.000
<v Speaker 1>too much time, but I do. This is something that

0:29:47.040 --> 0:29:50.040
<v Speaker 1>always comes up. People will talk about how the WNBA

0:29:50.120 --> 0:29:53.400
<v Speaker 1>doesn't make any money, how the WNBA is just relying

0:29:53.520 --> 0:29:55.880
<v Speaker 1>and sucking off the teed of the NBA. Meanwhile, we

0:29:55.920 --> 0:29:58.800
<v Speaker 1>will have NBA teams that openly claim losses for the

0:29:58.920 --> 0:30:01.360
<v Speaker 1>year that will never be you to point to the

0:30:01.400 --> 0:30:04.480
<v Speaker 1>product being a problem on the NBA side. So, as

0:30:04.520 --> 0:30:08.680
<v Speaker 1>an economist, quickly, if you can walk us through how

0:30:08.760 --> 0:30:12.080
<v Speaker 1>that's just a matter of presentation, particularly when it comes

0:30:12.160 --> 0:30:13.920
<v Speaker 1>to things like tax write offs and where the money

0:30:13.960 --> 0:30:15.880
<v Speaker 1>goes and how it's spent and how it's delivered.

0:30:16.160 --> 0:30:17.840
<v Speaker 2>Because to your point, yeah, we do hold up.

0:30:17.720 --> 0:30:19.800
<v Speaker 1>Women as this black and white, and then on the

0:30:19.840 --> 0:30:22.800
<v Speaker 1>men's side, it's this mirage of how are we reporting

0:30:22.840 --> 0:30:24.360
<v Speaker 1>things versus what's actually happening.

0:30:25.640 --> 0:30:29.720
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, So quickly, the NBA, which is the one calling

0:30:29.760 --> 0:30:32.480
<v Speaker 4>the shots in the WNBA, has claimed the NBA is

0:30:32.560 --> 0:30:37.360
<v Speaker 4>losing money since at least the late nineteen sixties early seventies.

0:30:37.360 --> 0:30:40.880
<v Speaker 4>There was senate testimony in the early seventies where they

0:30:40.920 --> 0:30:43.680
<v Speaker 4>said we're losing money, and economist Roger and Nole looked

0:30:43.680 --> 0:30:46.520
<v Speaker 4>at their financial statements and said, well, depends on how

0:30:46.560 --> 0:30:48.320
<v Speaker 4>you look at it. I can look at it this way,

0:30:48.360 --> 0:30:50.640
<v Speaker 4>and you're making a ton of money. So it's just

0:30:50.680 --> 0:30:52.680
<v Speaker 4>the way you're presenting it. And the NBA has been

0:30:52.680 --> 0:30:55.200
<v Speaker 4>doing this, and they do it because every time they

0:30:55.200 --> 0:30:58.240
<v Speaker 4>claim they're losing money, players give them concessions and take

0:30:58.320 --> 0:31:01.160
<v Speaker 4>less money. So it's a very good labor negotiation strategy.

0:31:01.600 --> 0:31:05.160
<v Speaker 4>So WNBA has suffered the same kind of fate. NBA

0:31:05.240 --> 0:31:08.160
<v Speaker 4>owners keep claiming it loses money. The amount of money

0:31:08.160 --> 0:31:10.920
<v Speaker 4>they claim it's losing is ridiculous compared to the NBA.

0:31:11.640 --> 0:31:13.640
<v Speaker 4>It's a very very tiny amount of money that they

0:31:13.640 --> 0:31:16.680
<v Speaker 4>even claim. There's no reason to think that what they

0:31:16.680 --> 0:31:19.800
<v Speaker 4>claim is true. We don't see the financial statements. We

0:31:19.880 --> 0:31:22.760
<v Speaker 4>have too many reporters, especially at the New York Times

0:31:22.840 --> 0:31:26.560
<v Speaker 4>New York Post, who report an assertion of losses as

0:31:26.600 --> 0:31:31.080
<v Speaker 4>a fact. If somebody tells a reporter, I am doing

0:31:31.120 --> 0:31:33.280
<v Speaker 4>something and there's no evidence for that. You don't report

0:31:33.320 --> 0:31:35.840
<v Speaker 4>it as a fact. That's not how reporting works. But

0:31:35.880 --> 0:31:38.320
<v Speaker 4>the NBA gets that, they get that treatment. They say,

0:31:38.520 --> 0:31:41.320
<v Speaker 4>WAA is losing forty million. New York Post writes, WNBA

0:31:41.400 --> 0:31:43.600
<v Speaker 4>is losing forty million. You don't know that. You didn't

0:31:43.600 --> 0:31:45.800
<v Speaker 4>see any financial statements. How do you know that? So

0:31:46.800 --> 0:31:49.120
<v Speaker 4>there's reason to think that they're not telling the truth

0:31:49.160 --> 0:31:51.320
<v Speaker 4>because they didn't tell the truth about the NBA for

0:31:51.360 --> 0:31:53.800
<v Speaker 4>all those years. The amount of losses we're talking about

0:31:53.840 --> 0:32:00.240
<v Speaker 4>are incredibly tiny. They're not significant even if they do exist. Yeah,

0:32:00.280 --> 0:32:02.200
<v Speaker 4>going back that media deal, they're going to be taking

0:32:02.280 --> 0:32:05.280
<v Speaker 4>billions of dollars from the WNBA. So if you're losing

0:32:05.320 --> 0:32:08.720
<v Speaker 4>forty million, well you're going to be getting billions. That

0:32:08.880 --> 0:32:11.800
<v Speaker 4>WNBA media deal is it worth probably eight to ten

0:32:11.880 --> 0:32:15.040
<v Speaker 4>billion dollars and they're getting two that's eight billion dollars.

0:32:15.680 --> 0:32:17.360
<v Speaker 4>So it's tough money they're taking.

0:32:18.400 --> 0:32:21.760
<v Speaker 1>And it's really hard because without the transparency of the financials,

0:32:21.800 --> 0:32:23.800
<v Speaker 1>you can run with whatever argument you want to make.

0:32:23.840 --> 0:32:26.840
<v Speaker 1>And what we end up doing is saying NBA teams

0:32:26.840 --> 0:32:30.840
<v Speaker 1>are losing money, but their valuations are billions of dollars, Like,

0:32:30.880 --> 0:32:32.800
<v Speaker 1>how does that work every year that you say you've

0:32:32.800 --> 0:32:35.240
<v Speaker 1>been losing money for the last fifty plus years, and

0:32:35.320 --> 0:32:37.400
<v Speaker 1>yet with each passing year, the investment in owning a

0:32:37.440 --> 0:32:39.960
<v Speaker 1>team becomes more and more lucrative, regardless of how you

0:32:40.040 --> 0:32:43.880
<v Speaker 1>run it poorly, well, whatever. But we don't afford that

0:32:43.920 --> 0:32:47.280
<v Speaker 1>same principle or that same idea to the WNBA side.

0:32:47.760 --> 0:32:50.400
<v Speaker 1>I could keep talking to Chill forever. We're out of time, Nef.

0:32:50.680 --> 0:32:53.520
<v Speaker 1>Last question, what do you hope folks take away from

0:32:53.520 --> 0:32:53.960
<v Speaker 1>this book?

0:32:55.160 --> 0:32:58.240
<v Speaker 5>I hope folks take away and understanding that the way

0:32:58.280 --> 0:33:01.240
<v Speaker 5>that the stories have been framed to them about women's

0:33:01.240 --> 0:33:05.120
<v Speaker 5>sports is incorrect. I hope they consider our reframing of

0:33:05.200 --> 0:33:08.160
<v Speaker 5>women's sports and the context that we provide, in historical

0:33:08.200 --> 0:33:11.320
<v Speaker 5>context that we provide to show that women's sports are

0:33:11.320 --> 0:33:15.800
<v Speaker 5>doing fine, they're doing great, they're excelling, and understanding the

0:33:15.840 --> 0:33:18.000
<v Speaker 5>history and the context of that makes it shows or

0:33:18.080 --> 0:33:20.640
<v Speaker 5>paints a much clearer picture for everyone.

0:33:20.920 --> 0:33:23.360
<v Speaker 1>Well, I'm so grateful to y'all for doing the tough

0:33:23.480 --> 0:33:26.880
<v Speaker 1>academic research and the actual work to put things down

0:33:26.920 --> 0:33:30.120
<v Speaker 1>in print that are actually correct, as opposed to those

0:33:30.120 --> 0:33:34.080
<v Speaker 1>who are willing to and face NOO accountability or repercussions

0:33:34.080 --> 0:33:39.240
<v Speaker 1>for flinging around misinformation in pursuit of dragging down women

0:33:39.320 --> 0:33:43.280
<v Speaker 1>because of their weak, sad little egos. Anyway, this is

0:33:43.280 --> 0:33:44.920
<v Speaker 1>a great book Slaying the trolls.

0:33:45.040 --> 0:33:45.680
<v Speaker 2>Everyone get it.

0:33:45.720 --> 0:33:47.560
<v Speaker 4>Thanks so much for coming on, Thanks for having us.

0:33:48.240 --> 0:33:59.440
<v Speaker 1>Got to pay some bills. Stick around slices, Welcome back slices.

0:33:59.520 --> 0:34:01.120
<v Speaker 1>Make sure you go out and get the book. And

0:34:01.160 --> 0:34:03.320
<v Speaker 1>if you're interested in reading more about what Dave mentioned

0:34:03.360 --> 0:34:06.600
<v Speaker 1>regarding the whole NBA handling of the WNBA TV deal,

0:34:06.840 --> 0:34:08.920
<v Speaker 1>We're going to put his substack article about.

0:34:08.680 --> 0:34:11.680
<v Speaker 2>It in today's show notes. We'll talk to you tomorrow. Slices.

0:34:12.239 --> 0:34:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Good Game Nephen Dave, Good Game Spanish tapis Thank you Trolls.

0:34:20.000 --> 0:34:22.320
<v Speaker 1>Good Game with Sarah Spain is an iHeart women's sports

0:34:22.360 --> 0:34:25.400
<v Speaker 1>production in partnership with Deep Blue Sports and Entertainment. You

0:34:25.400 --> 0:34:28.080
<v Speaker 1>can find us on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or

0:34:28.080 --> 0:34:31.440
<v Speaker 1>wherever you get your podcasts. Production by Wonder Media Network,

0:34:31.560 --> 0:34:34.640
<v Speaker 1>our producers are Alex Azzie and Misha Jones. Our executive

0:34:34.640 --> 0:34:38.320
<v Speaker 1>producers are Christina Everett, Jesse Katz, Jenny Kaplan, and Emily Rudder.

0:34:38.640 --> 0:34:41.840
<v Speaker 1>Our editors are Emily Rutterer Britney Martinez, Grace Lynch, and

0:34:41.880 --> 0:34:45.239
<v Speaker 1>Lindsay Crowdowell. Production assistants from Lucy Jones and I'm Your

0:34:45.239 --> 0:34:46.240
<v Speaker 1>Host Sarah Spain.