WEBVTT - Mini Crush #73

0:00:00.640 --> 0:00:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Movie Crush, a production of I Heart Radio.

0:00:29.320 --> 0:00:36.360
<v Speaker 1>Hello everyone, and welcome to Mini Crush, Mini Crush, Mini Crush.

0:00:37.080 --> 0:00:42.040
<v Speaker 1>What are they where? No, that's like you're doing smelly

0:00:42.080 --> 0:00:43.920
<v Speaker 1>Cat now. I was kind of doing. Um, I was

0:00:43.960 --> 0:00:48.599
<v Speaker 1>sort of doing the Star Trek theme dot dot dot

0:00:48.680 --> 0:00:53.040
<v Speaker 1>dot all cats Medleyka, what a smelly cat? Is that?

0:00:53.080 --> 0:00:55.840
<v Speaker 1>From dirty Rock? From Friends? From Friends? I didn't know

0:00:55.880 --> 0:00:58.480
<v Speaker 1>they ripped off Star Trek. I guess our star track.

0:00:59.440 --> 0:01:02.800
<v Speaker 1>It's my face Avorite. How are you doing? I'm doing well, man,

0:01:02.880 --> 0:01:05.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm still kind of on the manda from my scooter injury.

0:01:05.760 --> 0:01:08.880
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's hear scooter update. Scooter update. Uh, my

0:01:09.000 --> 0:01:13.240
<v Speaker 1>arm is about it's operating about seven percent capacity. I

0:01:13.240 --> 0:01:14.800
<v Speaker 1>can still, I can lift it up, I can wash

0:01:14.840 --> 0:01:17.399
<v Speaker 1>my hair, I can turn the key to the ignition

0:01:17.440 --> 0:01:20.319
<v Speaker 1>to my chart my right hand. Thankfully I'm a lefty,

0:01:20.800 --> 0:01:23.880
<v Speaker 1>I think. So it hasn't affected too many activities. Um

0:01:27.200 --> 0:01:31.720
<v Speaker 1>already already with what good lord? No listen. Um. We

0:01:31.800 --> 0:01:34.280
<v Speaker 1>actually had a listener right in on the movie Crushers

0:01:34.319 --> 0:01:38.240
<v Speaker 1>page who had a very very similar scooter incident. I

0:01:38.240 --> 0:01:41.720
<v Speaker 1>know a young lady. She even posted video of her

0:01:42.120 --> 0:01:45.360
<v Speaker 1>busting ass and then pictures of her really kind of

0:01:45.400 --> 0:01:49.320
<v Speaker 1>badly bruised legs and knee. I felt bad for I

0:01:49.360 --> 0:01:52.480
<v Speaker 1>felt vindicated, That's what I felt. Yeah, well I should

0:01:52.480 --> 0:01:54.000
<v Speaker 1>guess she'd find I'm gonna find her name. I just

0:01:54.040 --> 0:01:58.200
<v Speaker 1>got killed scoter in Atlanta, hit by truck, first scooter death.

0:01:58.440 --> 0:02:01.480
<v Speaker 1>Oh I didn't know that. Even it's gonna start happening. Man,

0:02:02.760 --> 0:02:04.920
<v Speaker 1>I hate this thing. I do too, dude, I do

0:02:05.000 --> 0:02:08.040
<v Speaker 1>too with a passion. Now. So no, let's catch up.

0:02:08.080 --> 0:02:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Guess what we're not doing corrections corner anymore. I deleted

0:02:10.760 --> 0:02:13.919
<v Speaker 1>that post. Even we're killing it. We're just done what

0:02:14.000 --> 0:02:17.560
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about, Okay, go a little tedious revisionist history. Yeah,

0:02:17.600 --> 0:02:19.600
<v Speaker 1>well you know, the original idea was like, hey, what

0:02:19.639 --> 0:02:22.520
<v Speaker 1>movie things did we get wrong? And then it became, um,

0:02:22.639 --> 0:02:27.000
<v Speaker 1>you're saying you're not pronouncing a word right, more like

0:02:27.040 --> 0:02:30.680
<v Speaker 1>pedantic corner? Am I right? Yeah? So, and truthfully, it's

0:02:30.680 --> 0:02:34.000
<v Speaker 1>not a great bit anyway. It's just dumb. So um,

0:02:34.160 --> 0:02:36.639
<v Speaker 1>it's too hard on yourself, chuck. Sorry everyone, I will

0:02:36.680 --> 0:02:40.239
<v Speaker 1>say this though, let's finish it out. A few people

0:02:40.280 --> 0:02:42.960
<v Speaker 1>posted this, thank you for being a friend. Was not

0:02:43.080 --> 0:02:46.160
<v Speaker 1>Carol king you. I was thinking, I said, that. I

0:02:46.240 --> 0:02:50.639
<v Speaker 1>was thinking of, Uh, you just gonna let my name,

0:02:50.680 --> 0:02:53.320
<v Speaker 1>and you know what, You've got a friend. That James

0:02:53.320 --> 0:02:59.160
<v Speaker 1>Taylor song, God a friend in me looking over here,

0:02:59.200 --> 0:03:03.320
<v Speaker 1>there's a thing going on. Maybe we could get some

0:03:03.680 --> 0:03:08.320
<v Speaker 1>lunch together sometime. What a guy? Can you just sing

0:03:08.360 --> 0:03:12.000
<v Speaker 1>about anything? You're saying? It's a Disney Family guy does

0:03:12.000 --> 0:03:13.920
<v Speaker 1>a good bit with that where he's like, look, go

0:03:14.040 --> 0:03:17.760
<v Speaker 1>over there, it's an apple tree. Got to pick me

0:03:17.880 --> 0:03:21.720
<v Speaker 1>apple it. Sure it's delicious. So I just ripped off

0:03:21.760 --> 0:03:24.280
<v Speaker 1>Family guy. No, it's not not at all. By the way,

0:03:24.280 --> 0:03:26.200
<v Speaker 1>that is not Carol King. I got it wrong. I

0:03:26.240 --> 0:03:29.320
<v Speaker 1>was thinking of, you've got a friend. Uh, it was

0:03:29.360 --> 0:03:31.639
<v Speaker 1>written by a gentleman, and then for the Golden Girls theme,

0:03:31.639 --> 0:03:34.320
<v Speaker 1>it was sung by a lady named Cynthia. Got something,

0:03:34.560 --> 0:03:37.680
<v Speaker 1>got it? So that's the last one. Everyone. I had

0:03:37.720 --> 0:03:40.600
<v Speaker 1>never ascribed that song to having even having a writer.

0:03:40.680 --> 0:03:42.680
<v Speaker 1>I thought I just kind of like came into being,

0:03:42.920 --> 0:03:45.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, be Arthur just set a fever dream exactly.

0:03:46.080 --> 0:03:47.760
<v Speaker 1>I didn't realize that The Golden Girls was a spin

0:03:47.800 --> 0:03:51.320
<v Speaker 1>off of another show called Maud. I didn't know about Maud.

0:03:51.440 --> 0:03:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Hold on a second. I just watched Maud is be

0:03:54.240 --> 0:03:57.720
<v Speaker 1>Arthur's character and Golden Girl's mod. Ye, what that's Maud.

0:03:58.440 --> 0:04:00.920
<v Speaker 1>I did not know that. Yeah, Maud was when I

0:04:00.960 --> 0:04:03.760
<v Speaker 1>was kid. It was the seventies and it was speaking

0:04:03.760 --> 0:04:06.640
<v Speaker 1>of theme songs. Was that big famous producer guy that

0:04:06.680 --> 0:04:12.280
<v Speaker 1>did all those Oh man Nol, You haven't heard the

0:04:12.280 --> 0:04:15.960
<v Speaker 1>theme song to Maud? No lady, good dab. But was

0:04:16.000 --> 0:04:18.520
<v Speaker 1>a freedom ride? Oh that's great. Oh it's great. They

0:04:18.520 --> 0:04:20.159
<v Speaker 1>thinking about women in history, and then they go and

0:04:20.200 --> 0:04:25.960
<v Speaker 1>then there's Maud. Of course she occupies her own individual spaces. Well,

0:04:26.000 --> 0:04:27.840
<v Speaker 1>I feel like a dummy. I mean, I guess I've

0:04:27.880 --> 0:04:30.159
<v Speaker 1>never seen Golden Girls. I wouldn't know. They wouldn't have known.

0:04:30.320 --> 0:04:33.360
<v Speaker 1>But I did not know that was Mad. So what's

0:04:33.360 --> 0:04:35.760
<v Speaker 1>the idea she has? She lost her husband, I guess yeah.

0:04:35.760 --> 0:04:37.800
<v Speaker 1>And I only read a brief synopsis of Maud. I've

0:04:37.839 --> 0:04:39.839
<v Speaker 1>never seen Maud. But I think in Maud she lives

0:04:39.880 --> 0:04:42.039
<v Speaker 1>in like she's a very like liberal, kind of like

0:04:42.120 --> 0:04:44.479
<v Speaker 1>activist d type woman in New York City living in

0:04:44.480 --> 0:04:47.720
<v Speaker 1>a house with a bunch of unconventional roommates and and

0:04:47.839 --> 0:04:49.680
<v Speaker 1>mad she had a husband, and Maud she maybe had

0:04:49.720 --> 0:04:51.480
<v Speaker 1>a husband, but I think she has like a deadbeat

0:04:51.760 --> 0:04:54.039
<v Speaker 1>son or something that looks I don't know, it's been

0:04:54.080 --> 0:04:56.480
<v Speaker 1>a while, but what's the relationship in the Golden Girls?

0:04:57.160 --> 0:04:59.039
<v Speaker 1>Who was she to them? Are they? They're all pal

0:04:59.240 --> 0:05:03.040
<v Speaker 1>sisters for in their friends and there's no sex thing.

0:05:03.240 --> 0:05:05.000
<v Speaker 1>They have a gay roommate that was a big deal.

0:05:05.560 --> 0:05:07.360
<v Speaker 1>That was like one of the first like outside of soap,

0:05:07.440 --> 0:05:09.560
<v Speaker 1>I believe, But no, I think the thing with the

0:05:09.720 --> 0:05:13.280
<v Speaker 1>roommate in Golden Girls, they maybe don't openly talk about

0:05:13.320 --> 0:05:15.000
<v Speaker 1>that he's gay. He just kind of like is clearly

0:05:15.000 --> 0:05:17.760
<v Speaker 1>a gay character. But in so Billy Crystal's character like

0:05:17.960 --> 0:05:22.320
<v Speaker 1>he So yeah, soap it's fucking funny. Yeah, it's really good,

0:05:22.440 --> 0:05:26.560
<v Speaker 1>way ahead of its time. Uh. Nola had Pam Peacock

0:05:26.680 --> 0:05:29.360
<v Speaker 1>on in her show, went over like Gangbusters. She is

0:05:29.400 --> 0:05:32.160
<v Speaker 1>a cool gal. Pam's awesome and we had a great talk.

0:05:32.520 --> 0:05:34.239
<v Speaker 1>And now Pam it's like the hit of the movie

0:05:34.240 --> 0:05:37.920
<v Speaker 1>Crush Page. Everyone's like more Pam. Really, Yes, We're gonna

0:05:37.920 --> 0:05:40.440
<v Speaker 1>do a filmmaker series. I just seven decided or it's

0:05:40.480 --> 0:05:43.560
<v Speaker 1>really up to her, um, but I pitched to her

0:05:43.920 --> 0:05:48.400
<v Speaker 1>either more Michelle Gandry or just filmmaker or films by

0:05:48.480 --> 0:05:53.920
<v Speaker 1>artists like Schnabel Julian Schnabel or Tom Ford like they're

0:05:53.920 --> 0:05:57.160
<v Speaker 1>making movies. Yeah, they are making movies interesting. I agree. Maybe. Uh,

0:05:57.440 --> 0:06:00.320
<v Speaker 1>Julie Taymour was she an artist. She was like a

0:06:00.440 --> 0:06:03.760
<v Speaker 1>theater person. She did a lot of like production designed

0:06:03.800 --> 0:06:06.520
<v Speaker 1>for operas and big, big stage production. I think I

0:06:06.560 --> 0:06:08.760
<v Speaker 1>just want to talk about her movies. Movies are cool.

0:06:09.480 --> 0:06:13.440
<v Speaker 1>And I'm also announcing another filmmaker series because I'm enjoying

0:06:13.440 --> 0:06:18.320
<v Speaker 1>these folks. Adam Pranica from Friendly Fire we recorded, which

0:06:18.320 --> 0:06:22.080
<v Speaker 1>will be out. Actually, I think it's already out when

0:06:22.120 --> 0:06:25.520
<v Speaker 1>you're hearing this. But Adam and I did Hard eight

0:06:25.880 --> 0:06:28.240
<v Speaker 1>p t Anderson's first film, and we are going to

0:06:28.279 --> 0:06:32.480
<v Speaker 1>do a pt Anderson series. That's the one pt Anderson

0:06:32.520 --> 0:06:33.880
<v Speaker 1>movie that I have not seen. I think we talked

0:06:33.920 --> 0:06:37.359
<v Speaker 1>about this last episode. Well, that's just a whole you

0:06:37.360 --> 0:06:40.160
<v Speaker 1>gotta film. Okay, I'm ready to read too. I'm ready

0:06:40.160 --> 0:06:42.240
<v Speaker 1>for it, all right. No, and the other thing we're

0:06:42.240 --> 0:06:43.719
<v Speaker 1>gonna catch up on here at the beginning of the

0:06:43.720 --> 0:06:50.240
<v Speaker 1>show is put up some poles for live shows. No poles, no, no, no.

0:06:50.960 --> 0:06:53.000
<v Speaker 1>I was just curious to see, what, you know, if

0:06:53.040 --> 0:06:55.560
<v Speaker 1>we could get some support to go out and do

0:06:55.600 --> 0:06:59.320
<v Speaker 1>a few shows. Uh, and so I picked six cities

0:06:59.320 --> 0:07:02.320
<v Speaker 1>and pitted them again it's one another and uh we

0:07:02.400 --> 0:07:06.760
<v Speaker 1>got four and forty votes. Um, Chicago got six of

0:07:06.800 --> 0:07:13.280
<v Speaker 1>those in Austin. So in theory would be so, you know,

0:07:14.080 --> 0:07:16.240
<v Speaker 1>maybe somewhere in the neighborhood of two hundred and fifty

0:07:16.240 --> 0:07:19.560
<v Speaker 1>tickets in Chicago, that's utterly respectable. Chuck. Yeah, of course

0:07:19.600 --> 0:07:23.320
<v Speaker 1>these are people just saying click not I will be

0:07:23.360 --> 0:07:25.040
<v Speaker 1>off work, I will buy a ticket, I will come

0:07:25.080 --> 0:07:26.640
<v Speaker 1>to the show. So you got to reduce that number.

0:07:27.160 --> 0:07:28.960
<v Speaker 1>But I think if we get anywhere close to a

0:07:29.000 --> 0:07:31.640
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifty people totally, that's well worth our time.

0:07:31.640 --> 0:07:33.360
<v Speaker 1>There's a couple of good venues in Chicago. We could

0:07:33.360 --> 0:07:34.960
<v Speaker 1>do it as a place called the Hideaway. That seems

0:07:35.040 --> 0:07:37.440
<v Speaker 1>pretty cool. And there's a lot of like smaller kind

0:07:37.440 --> 0:07:39.760
<v Speaker 1>of d i y venues that do like podcast host

0:07:39.800 --> 0:07:41.480
<v Speaker 1>podcast shows, and I know a bunch people that live there.

0:07:41.520 --> 0:07:44.280
<v Speaker 1>We'll talk about this. I think the one caveat here, folks,

0:07:44.320 --> 0:07:47.320
<v Speaker 1>is that my year is pretty full with stuff you

0:07:47.320 --> 0:07:49.880
<v Speaker 1>should know, shows and other travel and stuff and vacations,

0:07:49.920 --> 0:07:52.720
<v Speaker 1>and I can't, uh, I can't just pick up and

0:07:52.800 --> 0:07:56.160
<v Speaker 1>leave my wife and daughter a lot because it sucks

0:07:56.240 --> 0:07:58.640
<v Speaker 1>for me and them. I agree, So we're going to

0:07:58.720 --> 0:08:00.200
<v Speaker 1>try and figure it out them. Yeah, we can, you know,

0:08:00.240 --> 0:08:04.040
<v Speaker 1>plan out ahead. Seattle in Los Angeles, pitted against one

0:08:04.040 --> 0:08:11.800
<v Speaker 1>another sixty votes, resounding love from Seattle. I just don't

0:08:11.800 --> 0:08:14.680
<v Speaker 1>think we should go to l A. Never been to Seattle. Really, Yeah,

0:08:14.760 --> 0:08:16.600
<v Speaker 1>well maybe we should make that the first time. I

0:08:16.680 --> 0:08:19.040
<v Speaker 1>like it. I think my other show, Stuff They Don't

0:08:19.040 --> 0:08:20.360
<v Speaker 1>Want You to Know, is going to do a little

0:08:20.400 --> 0:08:22.880
<v Speaker 1>mini West Coast tour later this year. That would be fun.

0:08:23.040 --> 0:08:24.800
<v Speaker 1>That would be Oregon. It was funny. There was like

0:08:24.840 --> 0:08:28.480
<v Speaker 1>a thing on Nurdice that was like the most popular

0:08:28.560 --> 0:08:34.920
<v Speaker 1>podcast in different cities and ridiculous history one for Oregon,

0:08:35.320 --> 0:08:38.000
<v Speaker 1>that's for Portland or something. It was really strange. Um

0:08:38.280 --> 0:08:40.280
<v Speaker 1>different show, but it's still I'm looking forward. So I'd

0:08:40.320 --> 0:08:42.600
<v Speaker 1>love to take you to your first Seattle. I would

0:08:44.160 --> 0:08:48.719
<v Speaker 1>hang out with John Roderick Jennings and we could get

0:08:48.800 --> 0:08:52.160
<v Speaker 1>highest balls. Legally, it sounds like a plan. Do you

0:08:52.160 --> 0:08:55.640
<v Speaker 1>wander around, go to the market thing with the yeah

0:08:55.679 --> 0:08:57.760
<v Speaker 1>you got the fucking fish there you go? Or catch

0:08:57.760 --> 0:09:00.400
<v Speaker 1>a fish. Gum wall here, there's a gum wall. There's

0:09:00.440 --> 0:09:03.040
<v Speaker 1>a gum wall. Yeah, it's gross. Yeah, it sounds pretty gross.

0:09:03.480 --> 0:09:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Get some of those uh Couture's cherries, that's what they're called.

0:09:08.000 --> 0:09:12.800
<v Speaker 1>Is that a particular thing, chocolate cover cherries? Okay, Seattle, Uh,

0:09:13.080 --> 0:09:14.439
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I don't know if I'm getting the

0:09:14.480 --> 0:09:17.520
<v Speaker 1>name right. Okay. And then finally Noel Boston, New York.

0:09:17.559 --> 0:09:22.960
<v Speaker 1>We should just go to both of those because close

0:09:23.000 --> 0:09:26.000
<v Speaker 1>to five boats. So that's great, dude, we could pick

0:09:26.040 --> 0:09:29.520
<v Speaker 1>out like a four city thing. Absolutely at least three.

0:09:30.000 --> 0:09:32.520
<v Speaker 1>That would be so fun. Alright, No, I know I'm

0:09:32.520 --> 0:09:39.120
<v Speaker 1>a a squeaky wheel here, Chuck. Sorry, I love my family. No,

0:09:39.360 --> 0:09:41.640
<v Speaker 1>it's okay, dude, I love my family too. All right,

0:09:41.679 --> 0:09:45.319
<v Speaker 1>So we're gonna go with I haven't explained anything in

0:09:45.360 --> 0:09:47.840
<v Speaker 1>a while, had a little extra time to put into

0:09:47.880 --> 0:09:51.080
<v Speaker 1>this episode. So we're gonna talk today. Everyone about the

0:09:51.080 --> 0:09:55.360
<v Speaker 1>Wilhelm scream. Hollywood, I know you're a fan of the

0:09:55.360 --> 0:09:58.840
<v Speaker 1>Bill Holmes scream. Nol. Yeah, it's like that. Ah, that's

0:09:58.840 --> 0:10:02.880
<v Speaker 1>pretty good. That's a pretty good Bolt scream. I gotta say. So,

0:10:02.960 --> 0:10:04.920
<v Speaker 1>here's the story. Most people know this. A lot of

0:10:04.920 --> 0:10:07.120
<v Speaker 1>people listening to this probably know this what it is.

0:10:07.200 --> 0:10:10.240
<v Speaker 1>You may not know what some of the more detailed

0:10:10.320 --> 0:10:12.200
<v Speaker 1>parts of the story. Some of you may not know

0:10:12.240 --> 0:10:14.679
<v Speaker 1>what this is at all. So you're welcome because it's

0:10:14.679 --> 0:10:16.760
<v Speaker 1>one of the great great things in life and in

0:10:16.840 --> 0:10:19.560
<v Speaker 1>the film business. Uh, the fact that there is a

0:10:19.679 --> 0:10:24.840
<v Speaker 1>sound effect effect what the fact? Wait, I'm adding tease

0:10:24.880 --> 0:10:27.520
<v Speaker 1>to Crux. I need to get that tea from Crux.

0:10:29.160 --> 0:10:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Put it on effect United States. Um, it's there. There's

0:10:35.480 --> 0:10:37.800
<v Speaker 1>a sound effect called the Wilhelm screen that has been

0:10:37.920 --> 0:10:44.160
<v Speaker 1>used in more than two films, UM, hugely popular films

0:10:44.240 --> 0:10:47.200
<v Speaker 1>like Anchorman and Star Wars and The Lord of the Rings,

0:10:47.960 --> 0:10:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Toy Story, Reservoir Dogs, UM, smaller independent films, and it

0:10:52.600 --> 0:10:55.400
<v Speaker 1>has sort of been an in joke since it's It

0:10:55.520 --> 0:10:59.400
<v Speaker 1>was revived in the nineties seventies. So I think, without

0:10:59.400 --> 0:11:01.160
<v Speaker 1>going any for there, maybe let's just go ahead and

0:11:01.200 --> 0:11:04.080
<v Speaker 1>play the Wilhelm scream right now so everyone hears it

0:11:04.120 --> 0:11:09.719
<v Speaker 1>in its purest form. All right, that's it, everyone, Now,

0:11:10.200 --> 0:11:13.280
<v Speaker 1>let's play it for real. Here we go. All right,

0:11:13.400 --> 0:11:18.440
<v Speaker 1>So there it is. I gotta say, nol. Maybe we

0:11:18.480 --> 0:11:21.040
<v Speaker 1>didn't even need to say it. I think you just

0:11:21.080 --> 0:11:26.160
<v Speaker 1>needed more like uh vault general volume on it. You

0:11:26.200 --> 0:11:28.360
<v Speaker 1>were being kind to the microphone, you know, I try

0:11:28.440 --> 0:11:31.760
<v Speaker 1>to have good microphone etiquette, Chuck, you do a good job.

0:11:32.920 --> 0:11:35.400
<v Speaker 1>So Uh, like I said, it's a stock effect. It

0:11:35.440 --> 0:11:39.400
<v Speaker 1>was first used in there was a western called Distant

0:11:39.480 --> 0:11:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Drums starring Gary Cooper, and there was a scene and

0:11:43.600 --> 0:11:45.439
<v Speaker 1>you can watch it on YouTube, the very first use

0:11:45.480 --> 0:11:49.360
<v Speaker 1>of the Wilhelm scream where some dudes are walking through

0:11:49.360 --> 0:11:52.080
<v Speaker 1>a swamp and they get one of them gets dragged

0:11:52.160 --> 0:11:58.600
<v Speaker 1>under by an alligator. So, uh, debuted in that movie.

0:11:59.000 --> 0:12:03.200
<v Speaker 1>They did. Apparently, screams in the studio were performed, and

0:12:03.240 --> 0:12:07.120
<v Speaker 1>then the fifth of the six became this infamous scream. However,

0:12:07.160 --> 0:12:11.640
<v Speaker 1>it was not known as the Willelm scream at the time. Um,

0:12:11.679 --> 0:12:15.080
<v Speaker 1>that comes from a movie. Well, let me back up

0:12:15.120 --> 0:12:19.040
<v Speaker 1>a bit. Following that debut, uh, it became a part

0:12:19.080 --> 0:12:22.720
<v Speaker 1>of the sound effects library at Warner Brothers Studios and

0:12:22.840 --> 0:12:25.000
<v Speaker 1>was used in movies back then here and there, just

0:12:25.080 --> 0:12:27.880
<v Speaker 1>as not as a joke, but just as a scream

0:12:27.920 --> 0:12:30.800
<v Speaker 1>for your stock horror movie or whatever. Then in the

0:12:30.800 --> 0:12:33.520
<v Speaker 1>early nineteen seventies at usc S Film School, there are

0:12:33.559 --> 0:12:38.199
<v Speaker 1>some students who dug this thing up and noticed that

0:12:38.280 --> 0:12:41.960
<v Speaker 1>it was used in a bunch of movies. Uh. They

0:12:42.040 --> 0:12:44.079
<v Speaker 1>saw they thought. I think at the time that the

0:12:44.160 --> 0:12:47.160
<v Speaker 1>very first usage was from a nineteen sixty three film

0:12:47.240 --> 0:12:49.679
<v Speaker 1>called The Charge at Feather River. There was a character

0:12:49.760 --> 0:12:52.880
<v Speaker 1>named Private Wilhelm who gets shot with an arrow and

0:12:52.960 --> 0:12:54.440
<v Speaker 1>let's out the scream. So that's why it's called the

0:12:54.440 --> 0:13:00.520
<v Speaker 1>Wilhelm Scream. Got it? Um. Then these USC students started

0:13:00.600 --> 0:13:03.360
<v Speaker 1>putting them in movies when they started, when they graduated

0:13:03.360 --> 0:13:05.920
<v Speaker 1>and started making films as a joke. As a joke,

0:13:06.120 --> 0:13:09.719
<v Speaker 1>it was like an at leaster e that's cool. Uh,

0:13:09.760 --> 0:13:12.880
<v Speaker 1>And notably Um, a gentleman name the last name of

0:13:12.920 --> 0:13:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Burt b r t t I was a sound designer

0:13:15.160 --> 0:13:17.800
<v Speaker 1>at USA, went on to do sound designed for Star

0:13:17.840 --> 0:13:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Wars and then very famously in the scene where Luke

0:13:21.200 --> 0:13:27.040
<v Speaker 1>and Leah are uh on the little perch with nothingness

0:13:27.040 --> 0:13:29.640
<v Speaker 1>in between them and they eventually make the big grappling

0:13:29.679 --> 0:13:32.360
<v Speaker 1>hook swing across, but before that they're shooting up at

0:13:32.360 --> 0:13:35.400
<v Speaker 1>stormtroopers on the ledge. They shoot one, he falls off

0:13:35.760 --> 0:13:38.480
<v Speaker 1>class acuse of the wilh Holme screen. It was in

0:13:38.520 --> 0:13:40.360
<v Speaker 1>all the Star Wars movies, that was in all the

0:13:40.440 --> 0:13:43.440
<v Speaker 1>Raiders movies. It's been a ton of ton of films

0:13:43.440 --> 0:13:47.040
<v Speaker 1>over the years. And here's the fun part. They think

0:13:47.040 --> 0:13:50.080
<v Speaker 1>they have figured out who actually is responsible for it.

0:13:50.559 --> 0:13:55.920
<v Speaker 1>They found old call sheet from Distant Drums and then uh,

0:13:55.960 --> 0:13:59.760
<v Speaker 1>they had people listed for that day for additional dialogue recording.

0:14:00.440 --> 0:14:02.680
<v Speaker 1>And the one that they think it is was an

0:14:02.679 --> 0:14:06.360
<v Speaker 1>actor in a musician named chev Wooley. We don't know

0:14:06.440 --> 0:14:08.680
<v Speaker 1>for sure, but chev Wooley did go on to sing

0:14:09.280 --> 0:14:13.360
<v Speaker 1>Purple People eater, great name the novelty song. Yeah, one eyed,

0:14:15.200 --> 0:14:20.960
<v Speaker 1>one horn flying purple People. That's good stuff. Chock. So

0:14:21.000 --> 0:14:24.800
<v Speaker 1>that's the Bill Holm scream everyone, Hollywood history. Yeah, well sure,

0:14:24.840 --> 0:14:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Hollywood history, that's what we call it. So now that

0:14:27.080 --> 0:14:28.920
<v Speaker 1>we know what that is, jeez, I haven't done this before,

0:14:28.920 --> 0:14:30.600
<v Speaker 1>have I? Have I done Bill Holmes scream already? No?

0:14:30.600 --> 0:14:34.120
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely not be Superman, No not all that was news

0:14:34.200 --> 0:14:36.280
<v Speaker 1>to me. Here's a little cherry on top of this

0:14:36.320 --> 0:14:38.280
<v Speaker 1>story to nol is that we talked about the Bill

0:14:38.360 --> 0:14:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Holmes scream and stuff you should know years ago. Asked

0:14:40.640 --> 0:14:43.160
<v Speaker 1>Cherry to insert it and she inserted the wrong effect.

0:14:43.280 --> 0:14:47.840
<v Speaker 1>Oh no, it's some random scream and search for the

0:14:47.880 --> 0:14:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Wilhelm screen. Well she did. I think it was just

0:14:50.040 --> 0:14:53.320
<v Speaker 1>mislabeled and she didn't run it by us. Yeah, it

0:14:53.360 --> 0:14:55.360
<v Speaker 1>said Bill Holmes scream on the file. That's right, that

0:14:55.440 --> 0:14:57.080
<v Speaker 1>makes sense. So we had an egg on our face.

0:14:57.120 --> 0:14:59.200
<v Speaker 1>Remember back in the day, maybe you don't um, but

0:14:59.240 --> 0:15:01.360
<v Speaker 1>when used to like Torrent things, it wasn't even torn.

0:15:01.400 --> 0:15:05.360
<v Speaker 1>It was pre Torrent. Napster things. MP three would be mislabeled,

0:15:05.360 --> 0:15:08.600
<v Speaker 1>so you'd like be looking for like Dave Matthews band

0:15:08.600 --> 0:15:11.040
<v Speaker 1>and it would be like some schmos, you know, track

0:15:11.160 --> 0:15:13.360
<v Speaker 1>that he made in his bedroom, uploaded to Napster and

0:15:13.440 --> 0:15:16.520
<v Speaker 1>try to get people to you know, get into his stuff. Nice.

0:15:16.680 --> 0:15:25.800
<v Speaker 1>I like that. All right. Now we're gonna go with

0:15:25.800 --> 0:15:32.840
<v Speaker 1>the social studies, real quick. Social studies, uh, and just

0:15:32.880 --> 0:15:35.600
<v Speaker 1>read some of these. I asked, has anyone ever been

0:15:35.640 --> 0:15:38.400
<v Speaker 1>angry at someone else's opinion of a movie that you

0:15:38.440 --> 0:15:41.480
<v Speaker 1>loved because someone had an opinion about something that you

0:15:41.560 --> 0:15:44.560
<v Speaker 1>cherished that kind of just made you mad? Can you

0:15:44.600 --> 0:15:45.800
<v Speaker 1>think of one? I feel like a lot of people

0:15:45.800 --> 0:15:48.160
<v Speaker 1>feel that about you and Lord of the Rings Chuck, Well,

0:15:48.280 --> 0:15:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Jim Frank certainly does. He got a lot of laughs.

0:15:50.160 --> 0:15:53.800
<v Speaker 1>He went off on me and you for you not

0:15:53.920 --> 0:15:56.800
<v Speaker 1>knowing it well enough, and me because he didn't think

0:15:56.840 --> 0:15:59.920
<v Speaker 1>I even watched it. The movies, but he was kidding.

0:16:00.360 --> 0:16:03.520
<v Speaker 1>It was a big long diet tribe, so big up

0:16:03.560 --> 0:16:06.160
<v Speaker 1>to you, Jim, But he was just joking around. He

0:16:06.200 --> 0:16:08.400
<v Speaker 1>loves us because I thought there were like four movies

0:16:08.480 --> 0:16:10.080
<v Speaker 1>or something like that. It was all tongue in cheek

0:16:10.120 --> 0:16:13.840
<v Speaker 1>though that's totally fair opinion of yeah, I mean, well,

0:16:14.280 --> 0:16:19.080
<v Speaker 1>oh well yeah, Mandy. Our pal Christopher Hasciotes hated it,

0:16:19.680 --> 0:16:22.320
<v Speaker 1>despised it, you were indifferent, which I was still a

0:16:22.320 --> 0:16:26.160
<v Speaker 1>little miffed by, if I'm being honest. But Christopher Hasiotes

0:16:26.240 --> 0:16:29.680
<v Speaker 1>hated it. He he called it jokingly to me via text, Man,

0:16:30.960 --> 0:16:34.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, Mandy's last hour and a half of

0:16:34.680 --> 0:16:39.080
<v Speaker 1>my life have been wasted or whatever. It's really funny, Christopera.

0:16:39.120 --> 0:16:40.640
<v Speaker 1>It was pretty good work that. When I'm not I'm

0:16:40.680 --> 0:16:42.560
<v Speaker 1>not doing it justice. He did it much better jobbing

0:16:42.560 --> 0:16:44.720
<v Speaker 1>than that. But um, yeah, I know that bugged me

0:16:44.720 --> 0:16:46.800
<v Speaker 1>and some people you know, have really come down strongly

0:16:46.840 --> 0:16:48.840
<v Speaker 1>against that movie, just saying and I think it's I

0:16:48.840 --> 0:16:50.960
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I hate to be dismissive and be like, oh,

0:16:51.000 --> 0:16:53.440
<v Speaker 1>you just didn't get it, but sometimes there is that element,

0:16:53.920 --> 0:16:55.800
<v Speaker 1>there's a thing just doesn't click where it clicks for

0:16:55.880 --> 0:16:58.360
<v Speaker 1>somebody It's hard to say that out loud because that's

0:16:58.360 --> 0:17:01.280
<v Speaker 1>the ultimate snobby thing to say, why caveat it? And

0:17:01.360 --> 0:17:03.400
<v Speaker 1>sometimes people just don't get it sometimes, but it don't

0:17:03.440 --> 0:17:06.120
<v Speaker 1>get it because especially with a very genre movie like that,

0:17:06.560 --> 0:17:09.240
<v Speaker 1>like either you're like in it or you're not, you know,

0:17:09.359 --> 0:17:11.359
<v Speaker 1>And I was just super super into because it clicked

0:17:11.400 --> 0:17:14.000
<v Speaker 1>all these buttons for me. Yeah, or something that's supposed

0:17:14.040 --> 0:17:16.359
<v Speaker 1>like supposed to supposed to be dumb humor or tongue

0:17:16.359 --> 0:17:18.760
<v Speaker 1>in cheek and people are just like, it wasn't funny.

0:17:18.800 --> 0:17:20.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, well, no, it's not. You don't get it.

0:17:20.800 --> 0:17:23.160
<v Speaker 1>It's not classically funny. They're trying to do the thing.

0:17:23.480 --> 0:17:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Great example, like that movie hot Rod. Have you seen

0:17:26.119 --> 0:17:29.480
<v Speaker 1>hot Rod? It's it's that kind of thing where it's like,

0:17:29.960 --> 0:17:32.080
<v Speaker 1>if you don't really know that style of humor, you're

0:17:32.119 --> 0:17:34.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of like, this is just a dumb, bad movie.

0:17:34.640 --> 0:17:36.439
<v Speaker 1>But then if you realize how tongue in cheek it

0:17:36.480 --> 0:17:38.840
<v Speaker 1>is and how much they're leaning into this kind of

0:17:38.840 --> 0:17:46.560
<v Speaker 1>like weird, sort of subtle psyched k, then yeah, I

0:17:46.560 --> 0:17:48.320
<v Speaker 1>think it's fair to say maybe you just didn't get

0:17:48.320 --> 0:17:50.720
<v Speaker 1>it right. It's like saying, what hot American summer was

0:17:50.760 --> 0:17:54.000
<v Speaker 1>just like this weird bed eighties can't movie very similar? Like, yes,

0:17:54.240 --> 0:17:56.200
<v Speaker 1>hot Rod is very similar to what hot American Summer

0:17:56.200 --> 0:17:59.359
<v Speaker 1>in that way. Yes, first love it. I love it too, Jada,

0:17:59.640 --> 0:18:03.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm so Jade, and A Rosenberg says, people who brush

0:18:03.280 --> 0:18:06.320
<v Speaker 1>off Clueless it's just a silly valley girl movie makes

0:18:06.320 --> 0:18:09.480
<v Speaker 1>me livid. Shares a very strong female role. The writing

0:18:09.520 --> 0:18:11.760
<v Speaker 1>is great, it's fantastic coming of age story. She got

0:18:11.760 --> 0:18:13.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of likes and loves for that. I could

0:18:13.040 --> 0:18:17.000
<v Speaker 1>not agree more. Jade, Clueless is a great movie. Really

0:18:17.040 --> 0:18:21.680
<v Speaker 1>really enjoy it, and Emily lives it. I haven't seen

0:18:21.720 --> 0:18:25.800
<v Speaker 1>that probably since it came out. It's good. I remember

0:18:25.840 --> 0:18:28.480
<v Speaker 1>liking it. I was, you know, a preteen kind of

0:18:28.520 --> 0:18:31.560
<v Speaker 1>Paul Rudd who looked exactly the same today. He made

0:18:31.600 --> 0:18:34.000
<v Speaker 1>that dude's a vampire. That dude is the vampireless stat

0:18:34.119 --> 0:18:35.679
<v Speaker 1>he has a vampire. I don't want to meet him

0:18:35.720 --> 0:18:38.960
<v Speaker 1>one day. It seems like an interesting dude. All right, here,

0:18:39.000 --> 0:18:41.359
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna go with a little bit of a controversial topic.

0:18:42.280 --> 0:18:46.879
<v Speaker 1>Brian Amadi says this recent Keanu Reeves phenomena. I hear

0:18:46.920 --> 0:18:48.439
<v Speaker 1>people raping about him all the time now, and I

0:18:48.480 --> 0:18:51.600
<v Speaker 1>get irritated. Uh. He may be a great guy and

0:18:51.680 --> 0:18:54.440
<v Speaker 1>has been for but he has been for twenty years

0:18:54.440 --> 0:18:58.959
<v Speaker 1>one of the worst working actors in film. Unfair, unfair.

0:19:00.119 --> 0:19:02.120
<v Speaker 1>He said, there is not a movie save maybe Bill

0:19:02.160 --> 0:19:04.359
<v Speaker 1>and Ted, that could not have been improved by casting

0:19:04.359 --> 0:19:09.080
<v Speaker 1>another actor. I just don't agree. Yeah, because the thing

0:19:09.119 --> 0:19:11.560
<v Speaker 1>that people forget about Keanu Reeves too is his like

0:19:11.680 --> 0:19:15.560
<v Speaker 1>physicality and how much he like leans into doing all

0:19:15.600 --> 0:19:18.199
<v Speaker 1>his own stunts and like what hard worker he is,

0:19:18.400 --> 0:19:19.919
<v Speaker 1>you know. Yeah, I think there are people that have

0:19:19.960 --> 0:19:24.360
<v Speaker 1>certain qualities to their voice, uh where it may come

0:19:24.400 --> 0:19:28.359
<v Speaker 1>across as a little more you know, Like Sharon Stone

0:19:28.400 --> 0:19:30.679
<v Speaker 1>was one. I think she just has a voice that

0:19:31.240 --> 0:19:33.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, for a while she was not regarded as

0:19:33.440 --> 0:19:35.480
<v Speaker 1>like the best actor, but then she eventually got some

0:19:35.480 --> 0:19:38.160
<v Speaker 1>really great roles improved everyone wrong. But I think Kiana

0:19:38.240 --> 0:19:40.520
<v Speaker 1>might have one of those voices too. I know, kunk

0:19:40.560 --> 0:19:44.600
<v Speaker 1>fu yeah exactly, you know, Um, I get it. But

0:19:44.680 --> 0:19:46.800
<v Speaker 1>I think he is a good actor. That's the thing though,

0:19:46.840 --> 0:19:50.199
<v Speaker 1>Like I I also think that he is a campy actor.

0:19:50.600 --> 0:19:53.280
<v Speaker 1>He is sort of like a less over the top

0:19:53.920 --> 0:19:58.480
<v Speaker 1>uh Nicolas Cage kind of only I think Nicholas Cage

0:19:58.480 --> 0:20:00.199
<v Speaker 1>is a better actor. When he's a better act than

0:20:00.280 --> 0:20:02.199
<v Speaker 1>conna Reeves. I would agree that The Counties isn't a

0:20:02.280 --> 0:20:05.679
<v Speaker 1>great actor, but he's a very specific thing. No one

0:20:05.720 --> 0:20:08.040
<v Speaker 1>else can really fill that Keanas shaped hole. You know

0:20:08.080 --> 0:20:10.760
<v Speaker 1>what I mean. That's what I'm saying, because that hole

0:20:10.880 --> 0:20:15.960
<v Speaker 1>is shaped like the matrix. Uh. Mary Claire Grigson says,

0:20:16.000 --> 0:20:18.280
<v Speaker 1>people who don't get to the movie Down with Love

0:20:19.240 --> 0:20:22.600
<v Speaker 1>good Night, I haven't seen them. Joshua Fish, my boss

0:20:22.640 --> 0:20:25.320
<v Speaker 1>didn't like The Princess Bride. That pretty much sums it up.

0:20:25.480 --> 0:20:29.439
<v Speaker 1>It's the Princess Bride who doesn't like that movie. I

0:20:29.440 --> 0:20:31.720
<v Speaker 1>don't know, you're dead inside. I think that's that's fair.

0:20:31.800 --> 0:20:36.000
<v Speaker 1>Chuck American Psycho. That's who doesn't like that. Our old pal,

0:20:36.119 --> 0:20:39.440
<v Speaker 1>Theresa Tomorrow. I've never met anyone who has seen good

0:20:39.560 --> 0:20:45.200
<v Speaker 1>Night and good Luck? Oh, she says, I don't. I've

0:20:45.280 --> 0:20:47.320
<v Speaker 1>never met anyone who has seen let alone loved good

0:20:47.400 --> 0:20:48.880
<v Speaker 1>Night and good Luck. It's one of my all time

0:20:48.920 --> 0:20:52.000
<v Speaker 1>favorite films. Oh. I think plenty of people saw that. Yeah,

0:20:52.040 --> 0:20:54.720
<v Speaker 1>for sure, Um, it is one of those movies. Though

0:20:54.760 --> 0:20:57.160
<v Speaker 1>that time forgot a little bit like it was such

0:20:57.200 --> 0:20:59.200
<v Speaker 1>a big oscar movie, sort of like the Artist, remember

0:20:59.240 --> 0:21:01.879
<v Speaker 1>the Artist. I didn't see that see, but that was

0:21:01.880 --> 0:21:03.520
<v Speaker 1>a big old Oscar movie because it was one of

0:21:03.560 --> 0:21:06.280
<v Speaker 1>those Hollywood worship movies that was like the Golden Age

0:21:06.359 --> 0:21:07.920
<v Speaker 1>or whatever, and it was all black and white. Good

0:21:08.000 --> 0:21:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Night and good Luck was very similarly that it was

0:21:09.760 --> 0:21:11.920
<v Speaker 1>black and white. It was that leaned into that old

0:21:11.920 --> 0:21:15.960
<v Speaker 1>timy kind of like right, yeah, exactly. But I'm saying

0:21:16.000 --> 0:21:17.560
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of people kind of forgot about

0:21:17.560 --> 0:21:19.680
<v Speaker 1>that movie, and it was. It was very good. Both

0:21:19.680 --> 0:21:22.120
<v Speaker 1>of them were very good. They really enjoyed it. Our

0:21:22.200 --> 0:21:25.560
<v Speaker 1>oldest of friends, Vanessa Lopez says, when someone said to

0:21:25.640 --> 0:21:28.680
<v Speaker 1>me once they thought Shaw Shank Redemption was a poorly

0:21:28.760 --> 0:21:34.919
<v Speaker 1>executed movie, geez, not even I didn't like it poorly executed.

0:21:35.280 --> 0:21:37.919
<v Speaker 1>I think Shaw Sank Redemption is one of the finer

0:21:38.240 --> 0:21:42.720
<v Speaker 1>examples of movie making execution. What is wrong with people? Know?

0:21:43.040 --> 0:21:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Now I'm getting mad. There's a lot of things wrong

0:21:45.000 --> 0:21:47.359
<v Speaker 1>with people. Chuck, you know, where do you Where do

0:21:47.400 --> 0:21:49.760
<v Speaker 1>you even start? Where do you even start? Our old

0:21:49.760 --> 0:21:52.000
<v Speaker 1>pal Patrick Gorman starts with Star Wars episode one. The

0:21:52.000 --> 0:21:54.959
<v Speaker 1>Phantom Menace especially makes me mad when people say they

0:21:54.960 --> 0:21:57.600
<v Speaker 1>hated it at the time. I feel like it's become

0:21:57.600 --> 0:21:59.400
<v Speaker 1>one of those cool to hate movies over the years,

0:21:59.400 --> 0:22:02.359
<v Speaker 1>and I will die on this ill. What he's saying,

0:22:02.359 --> 0:22:05.840
<v Speaker 1>it's good, I think, so holy cal where do I

0:22:05.880 --> 0:22:10.720
<v Speaker 1>even start. He's got quite a little, uh, quite quite

0:22:10.720 --> 0:22:12.600
<v Speaker 1>a few comments on that. I guess. The thing about

0:22:12.600 --> 0:22:15.520
<v Speaker 1>that movie especially, it's just it feels so here's the

0:22:15.520 --> 0:22:17.440
<v Speaker 1>thing about Star Wars in general. To me, it's always

0:22:17.440 --> 0:22:20.240
<v Speaker 1>felt kind of like a melodrama, soap opera, e kind

0:22:20.240 --> 0:22:23.720
<v Speaker 1>of space thing. But I think the old Ones, when

0:22:23.760 --> 0:22:25.919
<v Speaker 1>it looked like an older you know, like a seventies

0:22:26.000 --> 0:22:28.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of movie, and like special effects were so innovative

0:22:28.200 --> 0:22:31.879
<v Speaker 1>and practical, it all worked, it felt like magic. The

0:22:31.920 --> 0:22:35.119
<v Speaker 1>New Ones, everything is so clean and crisp, and the

0:22:35.160 --> 0:22:37.639
<v Speaker 1>acting is just so bad, and there's a lot of

0:22:37.640 --> 0:22:40.760
<v Speaker 1>weird racial stereotypes, and the alien characters like jar Jar

0:22:40.840 --> 0:22:44.280
<v Speaker 1>Banks is really gross and this whatever that kind of

0:22:44.320 --> 0:22:46.000
<v Speaker 1>thing he's doing is. And then there's like the Trade

0:22:46.000 --> 0:22:48.920
<v Speaker 1>Federation guys who kind of sound like these weird Asian stereotypes.

0:22:48.960 --> 0:22:54.159
<v Speaker 1>And there's a ton of problematic things in those movies. Agreed, Sorry,

0:22:54.600 --> 0:22:57.199
<v Speaker 1>Joel Marks. Joel s Mark says he gets mad at

0:22:57.200 --> 0:23:00.880
<v Speaker 1>people who loved Avatar. I enjoyed it at the time

0:23:00.920 --> 0:23:02.480
<v Speaker 1>for the spectacle of it all. It was certainly the

0:23:02.480 --> 0:23:06.800
<v Speaker 1>best looking three D movie I've ever seen. Um, yeah,

0:23:06.920 --> 0:23:09.959
<v Speaker 1>I'm not I'm on record as not being a fan

0:23:10.000 --> 0:23:11.679
<v Speaker 1>of Avatar, but I don't think I would be mad

0:23:11.720 --> 0:23:14.520
<v Speaker 1>at some when he loved it. But hey, that's why

0:23:14.560 --> 0:23:17.920
<v Speaker 1>we're we're into this topic here. Absolutely, it's a good one.

0:23:17.960 --> 0:23:21.320
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a really interesting question. J. M Arroyo,

0:23:21.400 --> 0:23:23.240
<v Speaker 1>one of Oral Palace, says, my wife hated Gone with

0:23:23.240 --> 0:23:27.520
<v Speaker 1>a Wind after investing all that time, uh to end

0:23:27.600 --> 0:23:30.200
<v Speaker 1>the way that it did. She was so piste off,

0:23:30.640 --> 0:23:37.120
<v Speaker 1>and I found myself defending it since it was my pick. Okay,

0:23:37.840 --> 0:23:39.399
<v Speaker 1>I have a bunch of people picking on me for

0:23:39.480 --> 0:23:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Lord of the Rings. By the way, it shall be known,

0:23:42.880 --> 0:23:45.280
<v Speaker 1>I haven't seen any Harry Potter people yet coming after me,

0:23:45.359 --> 0:23:49.280
<v Speaker 1>but I'm sure that will happen. Potter rights, Yeah, Potter rights,

0:23:49.280 --> 0:23:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Potter bills. Uh. Chris Preville says I showed some friends

0:23:55.040 --> 0:23:59.399
<v Speaker 1>um into the Spider Verse and their only response was

0:23:59.560 --> 0:24:03.040
<v Speaker 1>it was okay, did you see a chuck? Yeah? I

0:24:03.080 --> 0:24:06.240
<v Speaker 1>thought it was nothing, just okay about it was awesome.

0:24:06.720 --> 0:24:09.280
<v Speaker 1>It was so cool, so visually striking, and the story

0:24:09.359 --> 0:24:11.520
<v Speaker 1>was great. It had a heart. Yes, it was just

0:24:11.600 --> 0:24:13.360
<v Speaker 1>it was good. And also I think for me too,

0:24:13.400 --> 0:24:15.680
<v Speaker 1>it was so much more than I thought it was

0:24:15.720 --> 0:24:18.000
<v Speaker 1>going to be going in then it just kind of

0:24:18.040 --> 0:24:20.400
<v Speaker 1>grabbed me and just didn't let go. Yeah, it over

0:24:20.440 --> 0:24:23.879
<v Speaker 1>delivered for what I was expecting. I tried to watch

0:24:23.880 --> 0:24:25.720
<v Speaker 1>it with Emily, tried to watch it with Ruby the

0:24:25.760 --> 0:24:27.879
<v Speaker 1>other day when I was out of town, and she

0:24:28.000 --> 0:24:30.280
<v Speaker 1>said it was too scary for her. It's a little

0:24:30.280 --> 0:24:33.360
<v Speaker 1>too spazzy kind of probably stuff I think, so going on.

0:24:33.600 --> 0:24:36.240
<v Speaker 1>So she watched p J Masks again. What is that?

0:24:37.000 --> 0:24:42.320
<v Speaker 1>P J Masks, p J mask Outlet? What is this?

0:24:43.320 --> 0:24:46.520
<v Speaker 1>It's a kid show. It's it's very cute, it's huge. Okay,

0:24:46.560 --> 0:24:51.320
<v Speaker 1>it's basically three little superhero kids. Oh cool? Uh and

0:24:51.560 --> 0:24:53.880
<v Speaker 1>it's just yeah, it's taken over to J Masks. It's

0:24:53.880 --> 0:24:55.679
<v Speaker 1>been around. It's it's good. I have to look into them.

0:24:55.720 --> 0:24:59.840
<v Speaker 1>It's fun. So I decide to have another kid. Hey,

0:25:00.040 --> 0:25:02.560
<v Speaker 1>never know, No you want all the kids? No? Not

0:25:02.680 --> 0:25:05.800
<v Speaker 1>really really one and done. I've just got she's ten. Man,

0:25:05.920 --> 0:25:07.560
<v Speaker 1>It's like, what am I gonna start over? Like I

0:25:07.600 --> 0:25:09.280
<v Speaker 1>don't know, Like I feel like, I've done all the work.

0:25:09.320 --> 0:25:11.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm already there. We're like pals. I don't want to

0:25:11.800 --> 0:25:14.880
<v Speaker 1>have to start from zero. You know, I'm good, guys. Prediction,

0:25:15.640 --> 0:25:17.240
<v Speaker 1>an old daughter is going to be like a senior

0:25:17.240 --> 0:25:18.760
<v Speaker 1>in high school and he's gonna have a baby in

0:25:18.800 --> 0:25:21.399
<v Speaker 1>his arms. Graduate. You never know, dude, You never know

0:25:22.359 --> 0:25:23.920
<v Speaker 1>because you had it when you were young, so you could.

0:25:23.960 --> 0:25:25.640
<v Speaker 1>It's not like you would be an old dad even

0:25:25.680 --> 0:25:28.000
<v Speaker 1>now you would be a medium. That'd be a medium dad.

0:25:28.160 --> 0:25:30.360
<v Speaker 1>So it's not it's not over, nol. It's not over

0:25:30.359 --> 0:25:32.959
<v Speaker 1>till it's over. You better, you know, you could make

0:25:33.000 --> 0:25:36.480
<v Speaker 1>sure this doesn't happen. What like gets the snippet? You

0:25:36.520 --> 0:25:39.159
<v Speaker 1>know there are surgeries to ensure. That sounds terrifying to

0:25:39.160 --> 0:25:40.840
<v Speaker 1>meet Chuck. I don't know. Thank you, sir. Then I

0:25:40.840 --> 0:25:43.280
<v Speaker 1>hope you hope you're swimmers under and you have an

0:25:43.320 --> 0:25:46.240
<v Speaker 1>understanding they are. Yeah, I don't know. We we don't

0:25:46.240 --> 0:25:50.640
<v Speaker 1>really talk, all right. Danne Pitts one of our old friends.

0:25:50.680 --> 0:25:53.480
<v Speaker 1>As Titanic, we know how it ends. Why would I

0:25:53.480 --> 0:25:55.960
<v Speaker 1>want to see it? Blah blah blah. Yeah, and she

0:25:56.040 --> 0:25:58.840
<v Speaker 1>basically says, let's never watch any warm movie than or

0:25:58.880 --> 0:26:01.240
<v Speaker 1>any movie based on his oracle event or read any

0:26:01.320 --> 0:26:05.720
<v Speaker 1>history books, or appreciate anything when we know how it ends. Yeah,

0:26:05.760 --> 0:26:07.800
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you. That's not a good reason to

0:26:07.920 --> 0:26:10.399
<v Speaker 1>not see Titanic. And here's a question for you. Is

0:26:10.400 --> 0:26:14.280
<v Speaker 1>it considered a spoiler if something is like a historical event,

0:26:14.320 --> 0:26:17.560
<v Speaker 1>like if I say, John Wilkes booth kills Abraham Lincoln,

0:26:17.920 --> 0:26:22.200
<v Speaker 1>is that a spoiler? Well, I mean if you're talking

0:26:22.320 --> 0:26:29.600
<v Speaker 1>to an idiot, well put chuck. Oh, that's not a spoiler.

0:26:29.800 --> 0:26:32.320
<v Speaker 1>Good lord. If people start calling people out on stuff

0:26:32.359 --> 0:26:36.320
<v Speaker 1>like that, then I quit as a human. Agreed. And

0:26:36.359 --> 0:26:39.240
<v Speaker 1>I can't find it in here. Oh where is it?

0:26:41.840 --> 0:26:43.760
<v Speaker 1>There was a young lady and I can't find her comment.

0:26:44.280 --> 0:26:46.040
<v Speaker 1>But she had a comment, and so I'm going to

0:26:46.119 --> 0:26:49.760
<v Speaker 1>summarize it as such. Is that anyone who Poopoo's musicals

0:26:50.680 --> 0:26:54.960
<v Speaker 1>period she hates because especially when they say things like, oh,

0:26:55.000 --> 0:26:58.560
<v Speaker 1>people don't just break out in song like that? No,

0:26:59.520 --> 0:27:04.320
<v Speaker 1>you think And she said, Hey, our action movies believable.

0:27:05.040 --> 0:27:06.960
<v Speaker 1>She's like, if you can have your movies where people

0:27:07.000 --> 0:27:08.880
<v Speaker 1>go around and shoot a thousand bullets from a single

0:27:08.880 --> 0:27:11.120
<v Speaker 1>gun and fight a hundred people, She's like, my people

0:27:11.160 --> 0:27:15.200
<v Speaker 1>can break out in song when science fiction we don't

0:27:15.200 --> 0:27:17.400
<v Speaker 1>have the technology. Yeah, that that means we're like cut

0:27:17.440 --> 0:27:19.960
<v Speaker 1>off from having space battles, you know, cut off from

0:27:20.000 --> 0:27:22.240
<v Speaker 1>space battles. It's no good see. And my thing too

0:27:22.280 --> 0:27:24.440
<v Speaker 1>is that's another example of I think you just don't

0:27:24.440 --> 0:27:28.520
<v Speaker 1>get it because there's something magical about really great musicals,

0:27:29.080 --> 0:27:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Like I could see not liking music. I could see

0:27:30.800 --> 0:27:34.840
<v Speaker 1>you not liking it. This whole like it's not realistic,

0:27:35.200 --> 0:27:38.320
<v Speaker 1>that's absurd, it's dumb. And then that's what a musical is, Chuck.

0:27:38.359 --> 0:27:41.280
<v Speaker 1>Have you seen the new season of documentary Now, No,

0:27:41.640 --> 0:27:45.960
<v Speaker 1>it's unbelievable. They do one what's I don't I think

0:27:45.960 --> 0:27:48.400
<v Speaker 1>it's three or four, three or four, But there's one

0:27:48.680 --> 0:27:51.919
<v Speaker 1>that does a send up of Sondheim musicals. And the

0:27:51.960 --> 0:27:55.280
<v Speaker 1>whole joke with Sondheim musicals is just rapid fire like words.

0:27:55.480 --> 0:27:58.000
<v Speaker 1>You can't catch your breath, you know. And John Mulaney

0:27:58.160 --> 0:28:00.240
<v Speaker 1>wrote it like it's a musical and it's called co

0:28:00.359 --> 0:28:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Op and it's about like living in a co op apartment,

0:28:02.680 --> 0:28:05.920
<v Speaker 1>like in New York City, and it's just like that,

0:28:07.320 --> 0:28:11.960
<v Speaker 1>Oh my goodness, it's the funniest and most accurate. It's

0:28:11.960 --> 0:28:14.160
<v Speaker 1>like it's meant to be like a live cast recording

0:28:14.520 --> 0:28:18.520
<v Speaker 1>of it, and it's so good. Yeah. God, he's funny too,

0:28:18.640 --> 0:28:21.840
<v Speaker 1>so funny, man. I can't recommend it highly enough. Bill Hater,

0:28:21.880 --> 0:28:24.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm telling you one day, Oh for sure, I love that.

0:28:24.840 --> 0:28:26.400
<v Speaker 1>All right, we're gonna close it out here. On this

0:28:26.600 --> 0:28:30.040
<v Speaker 1>segment with Heidi Lauman says I loved Monsoon Wedding and

0:28:30.040 --> 0:28:33.199
<v Speaker 1>a friend called it awful. I suppose I took her

0:28:33.200 --> 0:28:37.560
<v Speaker 1>opinion as an affront to my impeccable taste in films. Yeah,

0:28:37.640 --> 0:28:40.040
<v Speaker 1>I think. I think that's one of the things that

0:28:40.120 --> 0:28:43.200
<v Speaker 1>bothers people. Sometimes it's for me. It's on two levels.

0:28:43.280 --> 0:28:45.840
<v Speaker 1>It's geez, how do you How can you call that

0:28:45.880 --> 0:28:48.400
<v Speaker 1>movie bad? Gets an insult to everyone who works so

0:28:48.440 --> 0:28:51.720
<v Speaker 1>hard on it, And you're also making a comment about

0:28:51.880 --> 0:28:56.120
<v Speaker 1>my taste, And my taste is the best taste. That's

0:28:56.120 --> 0:28:58.000
<v Speaker 1>what everyone thinks. Everyone thinks you have a good taste.

0:28:58.520 --> 0:29:01.680
<v Speaker 1>Did you know that? Yeah, it's like opinions everyone. My

0:29:01.800 --> 0:29:04.200
<v Speaker 1>opinions are like, never mind, forget it. Yes, I did

0:29:04.280 --> 0:29:13.040
<v Speaker 1>know that, Chuck, I did. All right, we're gonna wrap

0:29:13.080 --> 0:29:18.720
<v Speaker 1>this one up with a quick stream this Noel I,

0:29:19.640 --> 0:29:23.120
<v Speaker 1>my wife and I have been watching Fleabag Good Things.

0:29:23.600 --> 0:29:26.920
<v Speaker 1>It's great. So um many people are away in the

0:29:26.960 --> 0:29:28.280
<v Speaker 1>know on this and a lot of people are like,

0:29:28.320 --> 0:29:30.880
<v Speaker 1>I've never heard of that. This Light Catastrophe is another

0:29:30.920 --> 0:29:34.560
<v Speaker 1>BBC show that Amazon Prime has picked up, and it

0:29:34.680 --> 0:29:38.080
<v Speaker 1>is the story of a of a young woman in

0:29:38.320 --> 0:29:41.000
<v Speaker 1>London who I say young woman. I think she's in

0:29:41.000 --> 0:29:44.320
<v Speaker 1>her early thirties. That's young to me, might be old

0:29:44.360 --> 0:29:49.600
<v Speaker 1>to some people, but uh, she is um sort of

0:29:49.680 --> 0:29:54.200
<v Speaker 1>known as as Fleabag, I guess uh. And it's Stars

0:29:54.320 --> 0:29:56.840
<v Speaker 1>and the Create and it's created by a young woman

0:29:56.920 --> 0:30:00.400
<v Speaker 1>named Phoebe waller Bridge, and it's just great. She does

0:30:00.400 --> 0:30:03.520
<v Speaker 1>this thing where she breaks the fourth wall. Ums sort

0:30:03.520 --> 0:30:06.640
<v Speaker 1>of like The Office, but it's not a documentary. It's

0:30:06.680 --> 0:30:08.800
<v Speaker 1>not a documentary. It's so it's really not like The

0:30:08.840 --> 0:30:12.560
<v Speaker 1>Office is like a magical realism directly to yeah, exactly,

0:30:13.360 --> 0:30:14.880
<v Speaker 1>Like she'll be in a scene with someone else and

0:30:14.880 --> 0:30:16.640
<v Speaker 1>look at the camera and say something that they don't hear,

0:30:16.720 --> 0:30:18.840
<v Speaker 1>you know what I mean. But that's just you know,

0:30:18.880 --> 0:30:20.920
<v Speaker 1>one part of the show. It's but it's a it's

0:30:20.920 --> 0:30:23.840
<v Speaker 1>a show about this woman in London and the complications

0:30:23.840 --> 0:30:26.440
<v Speaker 1>of her relationships with her family and her sister, and

0:30:26.480 --> 0:30:30.000
<v Speaker 1>her father and stepmother and all the various men that

0:30:30.040 --> 0:30:34.320
<v Speaker 1>she um dates and beds for various reasons. And there's

0:30:34.400 --> 0:30:38.680
<v Speaker 1>this under story. Um well you know what I mean.

0:30:38.680 --> 0:30:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Even can tell you the understory except that she has

0:30:41.200 --> 0:30:44.080
<v Speaker 1>lost a friend and that's sort of why she's in

0:30:44.120 --> 0:30:46.760
<v Speaker 1>this spiral. But it's very funny and also one of

0:30:46.760 --> 0:30:51.640
<v Speaker 1>these shows, it's very touching and heartfelt and just rerecks

0:30:51.720 --> 0:30:54.360
<v Speaker 1>you in some scenes. Uh. And you know who else

0:30:54.440 --> 0:30:56.760
<v Speaker 1>is in it, Our old pal, Brett Gellman. I love

0:30:56.800 --> 0:30:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Brett Gelman. And once again Gelman plays one of the

0:31:00.040 --> 0:31:02.200
<v Speaker 1>great creeps. He yells a lot too. Yeah, he's a

0:31:02.240 --> 0:31:05.600
<v Speaker 1>great great creep in the show as well. He's fantastic. Anyway,

0:31:05.680 --> 0:31:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Highly recommend Fleabag. I believe there are two seasons out.

0:31:08.120 --> 0:31:10.840
<v Speaker 1>We just finished um season one and we're gonna start

0:31:10.840 --> 0:31:13.560
<v Speaker 1>on season two tonight, just because it's like the Brits,

0:31:13.720 --> 0:31:18.000
<v Speaker 1>six episodes in and out, thirty minutes each, very bengeable.

0:31:18.200 --> 0:31:20.400
<v Speaker 1>Have you seen the new Black Mirror episodes yet? I

0:31:20.400 --> 0:31:23.920
<v Speaker 1>have not. They're good, I haven't seen. I think I

0:31:23.920 --> 0:31:25.480
<v Speaker 1>only saw like the first season and a half or

0:31:25.480 --> 0:31:27.280
<v Speaker 1>so a Black Mirror, So I'm just like, yeah, this one.

0:31:27.320 --> 0:31:31.040
<v Speaker 1>They only dropped three episodes, but they're each practically feature length,

0:31:31.120 --> 0:31:34.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe a little less, but interesting. They're like an hour

0:31:34.160 --> 0:31:37.840
<v Speaker 1>ten something like that. He's, Um, Miley Cyrus is in

0:31:37.920 --> 0:31:41.000
<v Speaker 1>one of them, and she's excellent, and I just think

0:31:41.000 --> 0:31:43.040
<v Speaker 1>they're really good. You know what. One of my dirty

0:31:43.080 --> 0:31:45.760
<v Speaker 1>secrets is I kind of like Miley Cyrus. I like

0:31:45.760 --> 0:31:49.040
<v Speaker 1>her to I don't know much about her music, but um,

0:31:49.120 --> 0:31:52.080
<v Speaker 1>when she says things, I tend to think, oh yeah,

0:31:52.160 --> 0:31:54.320
<v Speaker 1>I kind of agree. I think she's awesome. Yeah, I'm

0:31:54.320 --> 0:32:01.400
<v Speaker 1>a fan. All Right, we're out everyone, We're Miley, Miley. Uh,

0:32:01.560 --> 0:32:03.320
<v Speaker 1>do you got anything else, buddy? Now? I don't think so.

0:32:03.800 --> 0:32:07.160
<v Speaker 1>We're at a healthy It seems like it's been longer

0:32:07.200 --> 0:32:09.160
<v Speaker 1>than that. Yeah, let's go ahead and get out of here.

0:32:09.240 --> 0:32:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Let's do it. For more podcasts for my heart Radio,

0:32:25.760 --> 0:32:28.440
<v Speaker 1>visit the I Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever

0:32:28.560 --> 0:32:29.880
<v Speaker 1>you listen to your favorite shows.